  |
はてなキーワード: organizationとは
ハマスが「テロリスト」として分類される理由は、主にその行動や活動に基づいています。以下に詳しく説明します。
ハマスはその結成以来、イスラエルに対して様々な攻撃を行ってきました。その中には以下のような民間人を直接標的とした行為が含まれます：
自爆テロ: 特に1990年代と2000年代初頭、イスラエルの都市やバス、レストラン、ショッピングモールで多くの自爆攻撃を行い、多くの民間人が犠牲となりました。
ロケット攻撃: ガザ地区からイスラエルの都市に向けて無差別にロケットを発射する行為を繰り返しています。これにより、民間人の生活や安全が脅かされています。
ハマスの設立憲章（1988年版）には、イスラエル国家の存在そのものを否定し、「パレスチナ全土をイスラム国家として解放する」という目標が掲げられています。このような理念は、和平交渉を否定し、暴力による解決を支持する姿勢と結びついています。
3. 人権侵害
人間の盾の使用: ハマスはしばしば民間施設や人口密集地からロケットを発射するなど、意図的に民間人を戦闘に巻き込む行動を取っています。
強制的な徴兵: ガザ地区の若者を武装闘争に動員することが報告されています。
以下の国々・地域ではハマスをテロリスト組織と公式に指定しています：
アメリカ合衆国: ハマスを「外国テロ組織（Foreign Terrorist Organization, FTO）」としてリストアップ。
日本: 2005年にハマスを「特定の国際テロリスト」と認定。
イスラエル: 当然のことながら、ハマスを主要な脅威と見なしています。
テロリズムとは一般的に、「政治的または宗教的な目的を達成するために、民間人や無関係の者を標的とする暴力行為」と定義されます。この定義において、ハマスの行動は多くの国際基準で「テロリズム」と見なされています。
ハマスは、その民間人を標的とした攻撃や、和平交渉を否定し暴力を支持する行動、国際社会のテロリズムの基準に合致する活動を理由に、多くの国や地域でテロリストとして分類されています。ただし、一部の支持者や地域では、彼らを「抵抗運動」と評価する声もあるため、評価は国際的な立場や視点によって異なります。
I've noticed a non-negligible number of people who have not only completed compulsory education in regular classes but have also received higher education and graduated from university, yet struggle with reading comprehension (understanding the meaning of text), cannot read long texts, and even have difficulty understanding videos.
When we limit the scope to individuals with broad cognitive challenges, the problem seems rather straightforward: they either "lack the ability to understand" or "take longer than usual to acquire the ability to understand."
Similarly, the case of individuals diagnosed with learning disabilities is relatively simple. While they may not have broad cognitive challenges, they require different approaches and training due to their unique learning styles.
However, it is perplexing that university graduates without broad cognitive challenges or diagnosed learning disabilities struggle to understand not only written text but also simplified video content.
I suspect that the underlying causes might include gaps in the horizontal transfer of experiences and knowledge, a severe lack of adaptability, and an extreme deficit in metacognition. Has there been any research on these issues? Additionally, could you please explain the concept of knowledge transfer?
(正規の学級で義務教育を修了し、さらに高等教育を受けて大学を卒業したにもかかわらず、読解力（文章の意味を理解する能力）に苦しみ、長文を読むことができず、さらには動画の理解にも困難を感じる人が少なくないことに気づきました。
認知能力に広範な課題を抱える個人に範囲を限定すると、問題は比較的単純です。「理解する能力がない」か、「理解する能力を獲得するのに通常よりも時間がかかる」かのいずれかです。
同様に、学習障害と診断された個人の場合も比較的単純です。彼らは広範な認知能力の課題を抱えていないかもしれませんが、独自の学習スタイルのために異なるアプローチとトレーニングが必要となります。
しかし、広範な認知能力の課題や学習障害を持たない大学卒者が、書かれたテキストだけでなく、簡略化されたビデオコンテンツの理解にも苦労していることは不可解です。
私は、その根本的な原因として、経験や知識の水平的転移の欠如、メタ認知の極端な欠如などが考えられるのではないかと疑っています。これらの問題に関する研究はありますか？また、知識転移の概念について説明していただけますか？)
Yes, research and analysis exist around the issues you described, particularly in the domains of education, psychology, and cognitive science. Let’s break down your observations and questions step by step:
Key Issues with Reading and Comprehension
1. Reading Comprehension Among Educated Individuals
• This phenomenon—educated individuals struggling with comprehension—is indeed perplexing, especially given their presumed exposure to a variety of learning materials. It suggests that education systems sometimes emphasize rote learning and surface-level knowledge acquisition over deeper understanding, critical thinking, and metacognition.
• Horizontal Transfer Gaps: This refers to the inability to apply knowledge or skills learned in one context to another. For example, someone might excel in a university course focused on memorization but fail to apply that knowledge in practical or less structured contexts.
• Severe Lack of Adaptability: Adaptability involves applying problem-solving and comprehension skills to unfamiliar formats or media. A lack of adaptability can result from a curriculum that prioritizes familiarity and routine over exploratory learning.
• Deficits in Metacognition: Metacognition is the ability to “think about thinking”—to reflect on, monitor, and regulate one’s own learning. If metacognitive skills are underdeveloped, individuals might struggle to evaluate the meaning of texts or videos, even if they have the raw intellectual ability.
Research Insights
1. Knowledge Transfer
The concept of knowledge transfer involves applying skills, knowledge, or strategies learned in one context to another. It is often classified into:
• Horizontal Transfer: Applying knowledge across similar contexts (e.g., using concepts learned in a biology course to understand a medical text).
• Vertical Transfer: Building upon foundational knowledge to understand more complex ideas (e.g., using basic algebra to solve advanced calculus problems).
Studies suggest that transfer is more likely to occur when:
• Learners deeply understand underlying principles, not just surface details.
• Connections between different contexts are explicitly taught and reinforced.
• Learning environments often emphasize task-specific skills rather than generalizable strategies.
• Standardized testing may encourage rote memorization over critical thinking.
• Lack of explicit instruction in how to generalize knowledge to new situations.
Research highlights the importance of metacognition in learning. Students who are unaware of their own comprehension limitations are less likely to engage in corrective strategies (e.g., rereading, seeking clarification). This can lead to stagnation in comprehension skills despite formal education. Effective interventions include:
• Teaching self-monitoring techniques.
• Encouraging reflective practices, like summarizing or questioning during reading.
4. Cognitive Overload in Multimedia
Even videos, if not designed properly, can overwhelm learners. The Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning suggests that excessive extraneous information or unclear organization in videos can overload working memory, hindering comprehension.
Strategies and Research-Based Solutions
1. Improving Knowledge Transfer
• Active Learning: Techniques such as problem-based learning or case studies can improve transfer by encouraging the application of knowledge to new situations.
• Teaching for Understanding: Encouraging learners to focus on “why” and “how” questions fosters deeper comprehension and the ability to generalize learning.
• Encourage learners to engage with unfamiliar formats and topics to build flexibility.
• Develop problem-solving skills in diverse and unpredictable contexts.
3. Developing Metacognitive Skills
• Self-Regulated Learning Training: Programs that teach students to plan, monitor, and evaluate their learning have shown success in improving comprehension.
• Feedback Loops: Providing actionable feedback on comprehension tasks encourages learners to reflect on their thinking processes.
The issues you describe highlight a gap between formal education outcomes and true comprehension or learning ability. Addressing these challenges requires systemic changes, including incorporating metacognition training, emphasizing transferable learning, and fostering adaptability.
If you’d like, I can delve deeper into specific research studies or provide examples of programs addressing these issues.
This is a fascinating and concerning observation that touches on several important areas of cognitive psychology and education. Let me address this systematically.
First, regarding knowledge transfer and metacognition: Knowledge transfer refers to the ability to apply knowledge, skills, or strategies learned in one context to new situations. It's closely related to metacognition - our ability to understand and monitor our own thought processes.
Research in this area has revealed several key findings:
David Perkins and Gavriel Salomon's work in the late 1980s and early 1990s identified two types of transfer:
A significant study by Brown, Collins, and Duguid (1989) in "Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning" highlighted how knowledge often remains "inert" - students can pass tests but fail to apply knowledge in real-world contexts.
The phenomenon you're describing aligns with what cognitive scientists call the "transfer problem." Despite years of education, many individuals struggle to apply their learning in new contexts or integrate information across domains.
Some relevant research directions:
1. Cognitive Load Theory (Sweller et al.)
Shows how working memory limitations affect learning and transfer. Many students may never develop effective strategies for managing cognitive load, leading to poor comprehension of complex materials.
2. Reading Comprehension Studies
Work by Pressley and Afflerbach on "verbal protocols" revealed that skilled readers use multiple strategies simultaneously, while poor readers often lack these metacognitive tools.
3. Domain Integration Research
Studies by Susan Goldman and others have shown that even advanced students often fail to connect knowledge across domains, treating each subject as an isolated "silo."
Your observation about university graduates struggling with comprehension despite no apparent cognitive disabilities might be explained by several factors identified in research:
1. Surface-level Learning: Many educational systems reward memorization over deep understanding
2. Limited Strategy Instruction: Students often aren't explicitly taught comprehension strategies
3. Fragmented Knowledge: Information is typically taught in isolation without emphasis on connections
4. Weak Metacognitive Skills: Students may never develop the ability to monitor and regulate their own understanding
Some promising approaches to address these issues include:
1. Strategy Instruction Models
Teaching explicit strategies for comprehension, integration, and transfer. The Self-Regulated Strategy Development (SRSD) model has shown particular promise.
2. Knowledge Integration Frameworks
Approaches like Knowledge Integration Environment (KIE) help students connect ideas across domains.
3. Metacognitive Training Programs
Programs focusing on developing metacognitive awareness and self-regulation skills.
Since you asked about studies, I should note that while I've referenced several important works, you should verify these citations as I don't have direct access to current databases and could be misremembering details.
Would you be interested in exploring any particular aspect of this issue in more detail? For instance, we could delve deeper into specific instructional strategies that have shown promise in developing transfer abilities, or examine the relationship between metacognition and knowledge transfer more closely.
「クルド系だから問題視しているわけではない。ＰＫＫは分離独立を目指してテロ活動を行っており、
1997年10月8日、米国国務省は、米国改正移民国籍法第219条に基づき、PKKを外国テロ組織に指定した。
その後2001年10月31日、国務省は、改正大統領令第13224号に基づき、PKKを特別指定国際テロリストとして指定した。
tinyurl.com/5ecwdwca
w.wiki/5PDU
亡命トルコ、未成年の子供を持つ家族、男性の姉妹のPKK / YPGの疑い、偽造逮捕状の提出、証明書。
人口は約1300万人を生きています。 最大1500万。トルコのクルド人。
彼らの祖先だけのために。
連邦外務省の現在の状況報告によると、彼らはいかなる国家弾圧の対象にもなりません。
54
トルコでの非人道的または品位を傷つける扱いまたは処罰にもつながりません。
https://www.gesetze-bayern.de/Content/Document/Y-300-Z-BECKRS-B-2021-N-35315?hl=true
ドイツの判決「トルコのクルド人迫害を認定しない」【日本語訳】(12,000文字over) - 美桜
2021年、ドイツのミュンヘン行政裁判所は、「トルコ政府によるクルド人迫害は認められない」とする判決を下しました。
出典：
ドイツのメディア |ドイツの裁判所は、デモにおけるPKK指導者オジャランの写真の使用を禁止する判決を下した。
ドイツのクルド人団体「KON-MED」の元会長に対するテロ訴訟がミュンヘン高等地方裁判所で始まった。
日本で何をやってるの？
↓
「オジャランに自由を」
犯罪大家族(クラン)抗争の中心の一つ、独エッセンの裁判所で判決朗読の直後に被告人たちが暴れ、恐らく敵対するクランに属する傍聴人と殴り合い、防弾チョッキ着用の警官20人がようやく抑える。
2007年にドイツの/訴訟で、ク●ド●新●社はドイツで禁止されているテロ組織PKKの子会社であると認定された。/いわゆる援助団体は、救済活動と称した活動、脅迫、脅迫を通じてドイツで資金を集めている。/その後、テロ組織PKK/KCKの資金を集めたとして有罪判決を受けた。
x.com/mildliner2/status/1745444853943767395
www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/pkk-front-groups-send-funds-to-terror-organization/1674411?s=09
クルド人密入国者が不法移民に英国の亡命制度を騙す方法を教えた衝撃的な瞬間：
「絶対に」帰国させられないようにアドバイスしていたことが調査で明らかになった。
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12578125/Kurdish-smugglers-cheat-Britain-asylum-system.html
Country policy and information note: military service, Turkey
www.gov.uk/government/publications/turkey-country-policy-and-information-notes/country-policy-and-information-note-military-service-turkey-october-2023-accessible
｢難民ようこそ政策｣で治安が急激に悪化…警官殺害のアフガン移民を毅然と批判できないドイツ政府の大迷走
25秒の間に6人が重軽傷を負う大事件が発生
埼玉では病院周辺にクルド人100人の異常事態。難民受け入れで「ナイフ犯罪」激増のドイツは近未来の日本か？
toyokeizai.net/articles/-/758850
もはやテロ…｢総勢50人の大家族が集まり病院で警察官と乱闘｣世界2位の移民大国ドイツで起きていること
しかし、それが裏目に出て、現在ドイツの犯罪の統計を見ると、その頂点にいるのがクルド・マフィアとレバノン・マフィアだ。
彼らの犯罪は多岐にわたり、すでに様々な利権を獲得、暗躍できる法律のグレーゾーンも拡大している。
ドイツを悩ます「大家族犯罪」 法より「一家のおきて」重視で凶行や迷惑行為に関与
「2022年、ノルトライン＝ヴェストファーレン州で大家族による犯罪が20.3％増えた」
「大家族犯罪」解決へ 偏見を助長せず歯止めかけられるか スタート地点に立つドイツ
ドイツ全土の組織犯罪のうち10分の1がO●e●r●t氏族の関係者によるものだということがドイツメディアで報道されています。
クルドの狐
Rawa Majid
kurdish fox
Foxtrot (criminal network) - Wikipedia
w.wiki/B8DV
処刑、爆弾テロ、子供の暗殺者 - スウェーデンはいかにして麻薬王が支配するギャングの地獄となったのか クルドの狐＆ザ・グリーク
ほんの20年前、スウェーデンはヨーロッパで一人当たりの銃乱射による死者数が最も少ない国のひとつだった。
www.thesun.co.uk/news/24114449/executions-bombs-child-soldiers-sweden-gangland-hell/
スウェーデン政府が増加する移民犯罪に対処する為に、移民政策を変更して移民削減政策を進めています。
スウェーデン国内で麻薬取引・暴力犯罪を増加させているクルドギャングへの対策が移民規制強化する大きな動機の一つ
スウェーデン国内での暴力犯罪増加は、麻薬取引の覇権を巡って2つのギャングが争っている事が関係し、
ギャングの一つは「クルドの狐 」として知られるラワ・マジッドに率いられ、マジッドはトルコから犯罪組織を動かしているとされています。
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fISGXTBfJRY
スウェーデンでは特に外国人ギャングを中心に殺人、爆破事件、暴力などが増え続けもはや警察だけでは対応しきれない状態になってしまっている。
政府としても初めて問題の大きさを認め軍隊を入れて対応する事の検討に入っている。
スウェーデンで犯罪が多発し、若者がライフルを持って街を徘徊する
スウェーデン第3の都市マルメのローゼンゴール地区にある聖マリア・カトリック教会の前で、25歳の男がAK47で射殺された。
www.thelocal.se/20171230/one-arrested-after-police-car-explosion-in-malm
スウェーデンの移民の街マルメ、警察署はマシンガンを持った警察官で警備
www.thelocal.se/20180204/officers-with-machine-guns-posted-at-malm-police-stations
「並行社会」を生み出した
川口のクルド人問題「治安上、大いに懸念」 トルコ大使インタビュー
トルコ国内のクルド人は「選挙権もあり、人権は保障されている」と説明し、日本で難民認定申請を繰り返すクルド人の「難民性」を暗に否定した。
日本に滞在するクルド人が自国での差別や迫害などを理由に難民申請していることに関し、「トルコにおいてクルド系が切り離された存在であるかのような印象で物事を語るのは間違いだ。クルド系はトルコであらゆる政治活動の自由を保障されている」と反論した。
https://blog.nagutabby.uk/qiita-is-dead
はじめに
私は数年前にQiitaを使うのをやめました。なぜならQiitaがクソだからです。この記事では、Qiitaの黒歴史を振り返りながら、Qiitaが如何にクソであるかを説明します。
お前、歴史を振り返るとか言っときながら時系列で書くわけでもなく文章も下手で同じスタンス側として読んでてつれぇわ。読んでガッカリ。
あとお前のQiitaの使い方が気になるわ。
新着を懸命に全件チェックしとったんか？
たたき方が雑すぎる。俺が気持ちよく乗っかってQiitaをたたけるまともな記事を書いてくれ。
しかし、多くの方がご存知の通り、Qiitaは「他のWebサイトにある情報をほぼ丸パクリした記事」と「内輪ノリで書かれた下らないポエム」の墓場であり、決して知識共有サービスではありません。最近ではChatGPTが出力した文章をそのまま投稿する人々も現れ、事態がさらに悪化しています。
まあ俺も死んでるとは思うが、まだまだ新規な知見がある記事はある。なのにパクリだとかスクール課題だとかのたいしていいねもつかないクズな記事を見つけてほらクズだ！っつってもね。
書くなら「いかに知識共有を謳いながら巧妙にいいねハックされてきたか」とか具体例を書いてくれ。
内輪ノリもそういうハック、Qiitaの利益化のための企業・Organization重視とかの経緯を振り返ってくれ。
私はこのような記事を見かけるとひどく共感性羞恥を感じ、萎えてしまうのですが、私と同じような方がきっといらっしゃるのではないかと思います。
まともな言葉を使えないやつがエンジニアをしないでくれ。エンジニアか知らんけど。技術文章しかり公開文書なら古いほうの言葉の定義をちゃんと使うか、別の表現を使え。お前、会社で煮詰まるとか使ってないよな？
ウケ狙いは宿命であり流行ることは避けられない。レコメンドやランキングを好みの記事に絞れるようにしない運営を叩け。
いくら「技術ブログ」と謳っていても、技術との関連性が低い記事が投稿されることがあります。私はこのような記事を「ポエム」と呼んでいますが、Qiitaにポエムが投稿された場合はどうなるでしょうか？実は数年前まではQiitaに投稿された記事は運営によってその内容がチェックされ、ポエムに該当すると運営に判断された場合は勝手に記事が非公開にされていました。しかし、よく考えてみてください。ポエムとは何でしょうか？この記事のような愚痴を書き連ねた文章のことでしょうか？人間がそれを判断できるはずがありません。結局このルールは廃止され、今に至ります。
知らん。俺が知る限りここ数年はポエムはずっと寛容だった。お前が定義するポエムは知らんが、技術の関連性が低い記事も沢山あったしポエムタグもずっと盛況だった。
さくらとか、毛の壁…はどうだったか。質の低さをQiitaが検閲してた感触はないし、質の低い記事にユーザーが沢山通報して非公開化に追いやるムーブメントが盛況だった記憶もない。
愚痴を連ねるやべーヤツは対処されてた記憶はあるが。どうだったかな。
https://blog.qiita.com/account-suspension-in-qiita/
Qiitaでは「技術的にレベルが低い」「技術的に間違っている」「Qiitaというサービスや運営に批判的である」といった理由で記事の非公開化やアカウント停止という措置を取ることはございません。
過去にも何度か事例がありますが、アカウント停止措置の実施理由は殆どの場合、他のユーザーに対して攻撃的な発言や誹謗中傷を繰り返すなど、コミュニティガイドラインや利用規約に沿わないというものです。
ああ、上記の件の@administrator1974の今後必要になるプログラム言語もあったか。こういうのも確かにあったが、こういう人間が出てくるのはレアのレアのレアだったな。そういう事件は時たま起こるもんだ。最悪手をとらなければ非公開にそこまで強い非難はおきんだろう。
お前が運営のどういった運用を非難しているのかわからん。新着を全部チェックして見返してポエムが非公開になっていたことを観測してきたのか？詳細を書いてくれ。ぼんやりとしすぎている。
調べなおして思い出したが、もしかして2017年のこと言ってる？
それならたしかにmatzの記事が非公開になったりしてたな。でも2024年公開の記事で数年前っつって2017年を出すのはちと古い。もっとしっかり書いてくれ。あのときらへんはQiitaがどっちに舵をとるかどうかで揺れ動いていた気がする。結果、ガバガバの今に至るわけだが。
これについてもまあ突発的な行動で反発が出たわけだが
「実は数年前まではQiitaに投稿された記事は運営によってその内容がチェックされ、ポエムに該当すると運営に判断された場合は勝手に記事が非公開にされていました」
でずっとそのような運営がされていたように誘導しているが、実際はずっとゆるゆるでここで厳しくしてみて騒動になったという話。
俺もだいぶ記憶があやふやだが、それにしてもお前の文章からは悪意を感じるので信用できない語り手だ。まともな情報を時系列とソース付きで騙ってくれ。
https://yro.srad.jp/story/17/05/12/067229/
なお2016年のやつでもこういうのは残っててゆるゆる
「口やかましい少数派」に翻弄されるQiitaサポートは無能である
https://qiita.com/richmikan@github/items/8831c97598cc095e2b95
数年前に大幅なアップデートが行われ、ユーザーが読んだ記事が第三者に公開されていた時期がありました。これはWebブラウザーのアクセス履歴が第三者に公開されるようなものであり、個人が特定されるリスクがあります。また、業務で生じた問題を解決するためにQiitaを利用していた場合は、他者に業務内容を推測されるリスクがあります。このようなアップデートは避けるべきであり、社内で十分な議論がなされないまま機能が実装されたことは明らかでした。
うそでーす。
今のユーザーページにある投稿した記事のanalyzeみたいに見た記事の中で多いタグトップ5の割りあいが表示されてました。
何を見たのかはわかりませーん。特定できませーん。見た記事より書いた記事の方がよっぽど業務内容に繋がるわ。タグの割りあいだけで個人や業務が推測できたらそれはもうホームズレベルで超能力だから許そう！降参だ。
まあ俺もこれでJobsのほうにはいろいろ黙って渡してんじゃねーの？見た記事も企業側は見れてたんじゃねーの？と思って愛想が尽きた。実際には棲んでいる地域やワードとかも提供されてたわけだし。
だけど正確ではない情報を書いてんじゃねーよ。
https://blog.qiita.com/about-user-page-renewal-20200331/
掲示板やToDoリストのような、お決まりの題材を使ったアプリの制作過程の情報を日常的に目にするようになりました。これはいわゆるポートフォリオとしてQiitaを利用している例であり、シニアエンジニアの間でQiitaがオワコンになり始めたことや、プログラミングスクールに通う多くの人々がQiitaを使い始めたことを示すものでした。その状況を理解するや否や、Qiitaの価値の低下は避けられないと感じました。
これも人が増えた場所の宿命だ。Qiitaがするべきはレコメンド・フィルターの拡充であってそこを叩け。そもそもそんな記事はランキングに上がらないんだから新着汚染にしかならん。検索はストック数とかでフィルターしろ。
お前はどういうQiitaの使い方をしてるんだ？新着チェックしてた猛者なのか？エッジケースだよそれ。
とかくお前の切り口が雑すぎて悲しい。もっと刃を尖らせろ。
お前、Zennもこうならんって言えるのか？言えるならその理由を書いて比較して叩いてくれ。
Qiitaにポエムを投稿できるようになった一方で、Qiitaに投稿される記事の質が低下したことにより、Xやはてな匿名ダイアリーに表示されるような短文投稿が増えました。記事の文章は長ければ長いほどいいとは限りませんが、あまりにも文章が短く、それぞれの文の文字数が少ないので記事の内容が理解しにくいです。この段階に入ると、Qiitaはブログというよりもメモ帳と呼んだ方がいいのではないかと感じ始めました。少なくとも技術ブログのような目新しさや正確さはほとんど感じられなくなりました。
まあ、そもそもQiitaの出発(中盤かな。Q&Aから転換以降)はメモ帳共有でもあったがな。
Qiitaは、エンジニアに関する知識を記録・共有するためのサービスです。 プログラミングに関するTips、ノウハウ、メモを簡単に記録 & 公開することができます。
記事の文章は長ければ長いほどいいとは限りませんが、あまりにも文章が短く、それぞれの文の文字数が少ないので記事の内容が理解しにくいです。
そもそも俺はメモの共有が気に入って使い始めて「人に見せる記事」にしましょうって流れで居心地悪くなったから見えてるサイトが違うっすね。
だから人が増えたサイトで石を除いて玉を多く見せるのはQiitaの技術的な使命であってそこが現状のトレンドで不十分つーならそこを叩けよ。石の量が増えたことを嘆いたってなんの生産性もないし批判たりえんのだわ。
あと再度書くけど俺の認識ではポエムはずっと書かれてきたしジャンルとして排斥を試みたのはとても短い期間だったからな。
俺は今のQiitaが嫌いだしQiitaはいろいろやらかしすぎたしQiitaには俺が好むような記事だけを視界に入れさせろと思ってるわけだが、とはいえこんな文章に乗っかる気にもなれん。
お前が目新しい技術記事を書いてる姿がまったく想像できんのや。
話が抽象的すぎて正確さはほとんど感じられなくなりました。ってブーメランをわざと狙ってたのなら脱帽。
私はこのような記事を読んで共感性羞恥を感じ、萎えてしまうのですが、私と同じような方がきっといらっしゃるのではないかと思います。
It's sudden, but right now in Japan, creativity is facing a true crisis. Characters like Uzaki-chan, Onsen Musume, and Tojo Rika are being targeted and flamed, game character designs are being infiltrated by political correctness, Johnny's Entertainment is being dismantled, swimsuit photo sessions in parks are being canceled, Hitoshi Matsumoto is being publicly shamed, and the new AV law was enacted without considering the opinions of those directly involved. Every form of expression in every venue is currently under unreasonable pressure.
How does this connect to the Tokyo gubernatorial election? In fact, a major event directly linked to this is occurring in the 2024 Tokyo gubernatorial election. As a creator, I hope this message reaches you.
What I am about to share is a story about someone named Himasora Akane, who you should know about to resist such pressures. But before I dive into that story, I want to express my deep gratitude to my old friend Nozomi for giving me the opportunity to post this article in a place where many creators will see it. As someone who also loves manga, anime, and games, I hope this information will benefit Japanese society and support Nozomi's activities.
Himasora Akane Should Be the Governor of Tokyo
First, I would like to make a straightforward request to you as a creator: please support Himasora Akane for governor. In this election, please write "Himasora Akane" on your ballot. The voting day is July 7th. Even if you are not a Tokyo resident, I ask that you at least listen to this story. If you find it interesting, please share it with your friends, family, and acquaintances. You can check Himasora Akane's campaign promises and the background of their candidacy on their Twitter (X) posts linked below:
Himasora Akane (Tokyo gubernatorial candidate)
https://x.com/himasoraakane/status/1804846779399324095
Himasora Akane Will Not Allow Our Culture to Be Burned
Himasora Akane is an ordinary otaku who loves manga, anime, and games. Known as "Cognitive Profiling Detective Akane Himasora," he has been active on Twitter (X) and YouTube, and now he is running for governor. Akane, who is deeply concerned about the repression and destruction of otaku culture, is challenging those who seek to destroy our culture alone. Akane will never allow those who try to burn our culture.
As mentioned at the beginning, all forms of expression are currently under pressure. Otaku culture, in particular, seems to be a prime target.
Uzaki-chan Blood Donation Poster Controversy (2019): A collaboration between the Japanese Red Cross Society and the manga Uzaki-chan was flamed for allegedly being overly sexual in its PR illustration.
V-Tuber Traffic Safety Video Controversy (2021): A V-Tuber hired by the Matsudo Police Department in Chiba Prefecture was deemed too sexual for public agency PR.
Onsen Musume Controversy (2021): Characters personifying local hot springs were criticized as sexist.
Mie Transport Official Character Controversy (2024): A character in a bus driver's uniform released by Mie Transport was flamed for evoking sexual images.
These controversies are often fueled by so-called political correctness and feminism. For creators, these are direct threats. If these factions label your work as sexual and demand it be burned to ashes, could you resist? How would you feel if your painstakingly created work, like your own child, was trampled by people who have no regard for your efforts? Could you continue your creative activities while constantly shrinking away?
Himasora Akane saw something behind these flaming incidents. He started investigating the key figure behind the Onsen Musume controversy, a representative of a general incorporated association in Tokyo. This association's core business, the Young Female Victims Support Project, received substantial public funds from Tokyo. Akane submitted public document disclosure requests to Tokyo and thoroughly dug into the organization. During his investigation, Akane uncovered many suspicions suggesting this project was unworthy of public funding, which he exposed one by one on social media.
Negligent accounting reports, taking protected girls to the Henoko base protest in Okinawa, Communist Party members waiting in the bus used to protect girls—these revelations drew significant attention online. The investigation extended beyond this general incorporated association to other NPOs receiving public funds, and Akane named this cluster of issues the "WBPC problem" after the initials of these organizations.
Akane's YouTube Channel (WBPC Problem Playlist)
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLI5gTciLKtAXRyzv9j5FiNMcc8eoEBbMN
From here, Akane's story expanded to resident audits, resident lawsuits, and national compensation lawsuits concerning the Tokyo Young Female Victims Support Project. Akane discovered that behind many flaming incidents, there is no clear command structure but a group of various political organizations and activists working together like an amoeba. He named this group the "Nanika Group" (Nanika means "something" in Japanese), a reference to the mysterious, ominous "something from another place" in the manga HUNTER×HUNTER, which Akane loves. The Nanika Group is also connected to welfare interests, where public funds flow unchecked. Akane called this phenomenon "Public Fund Chu-Chu" (siphoning).
For creators, this means the tax money they earn through hard work is used to burn their precious works. It's an intolerable situation.
Himasora Akane Is Fighting Against Those Who Burn Our Culture
In November 2022, a major event marked a turning point in this series of controversies. The general incorporated association under scrutiny held a press conference at the parliamentary office building, gathering media and announcing a lawsuit against Akane. This "Legal Harassment Press Conference," as it was called online, involved multiple layers of power: the government, the media, and a team of seven lawyers targeting a single individual.
However, Akane did not back down. Instead, he intensified his pursuit, exploiting the opponent's careless statements as lawsuit fodder. This led to an outpouring of support on social media, with his Twitter follower count skyrocketing and 160 million yen in donations for legal fees.
The following year, a resident audit request filed by Akane resulted in Tokyo's official website recognizing some improper points and deciding to audit the organization. However, Tokyo's lenient audit led Akane to file a resident lawsuit. Suspicion also turned towards Governor Yuriko Koike for allocating public funds through dubious sole-source contracts. Tokyo began excessively redacting documents in response to public document requests, attempting to conceal the issue. Koike's promise to end document redaction quietly disappeared from her campaign page.
Throughout this battle, Akane has been a target of criminal complaints and faced threats, yet he persists. His book "Netoge Senshi" was released amid bookstore threats, but only the criminal complaint was widely reported by the media, portraying Akane negatively.
Himasora Akane is an ordinary otaku, a top-tier online gamer during his student days, and a talented game creator who worked for a major game company and later a venture company. His meticulous work on the game "Shin Goku no Valhalla Gate" was betrayed by the company's CEO, leading to a seven-year legal battle that Akane ultimately won, securing 600 million yen. This experience fuels his fierce opposition to having his creations burned.
Before investigating the Young Female Victims Support Project, Akane exposed fraudulent feminist "knights" on his YouTube channel, shaking the internet. He detests lies and has an uncanny ability to detect them.
Akane is a special individual with extraordinary abilities, honed through his experiences in games, court battles, and extensive document analysis. His pursuit of truth and justice makes him a suitable candidate for governor, promising a world without lies and where honest people do not suffer.
What We Can Do to Protect Our Culture
Creative expression can be crushed if we are not vigilant. Even in modern Japan, otaku culture is on thin ice. The recent cessation of Visa transactions for DMM (Fanza) is a reminder of how a single card company can wield its power to dictate what is deemed appropriate expression. Expression freedom is fragile and constantly under threat.
To those reading this, I urge you to vote for Himasora Akane. Support him to protect our culture. Despite his harsh demeanor and preference for solitary battles, he is now seeking help for the first time. Akane feels the danger in this gubernatorial election and believes that if he does not become governor, everything will end. He has taken a stand for the people of Tokyo and Japan.
I wrote this article to support his spirit and spread the word. Please vote for Himasora Akane and help create a miracle.
To you, the creator, I sincerely hope this message reaches you.
If you have not yet realized that Guo Wengui is a liar, those who help Guo Wengui cheat money, your hands are also covered with the blood smell of the blood of the compatriots who have been cheated, if it is not for your intentional wilful behavior in virtual farms around the world, Guo Wengui's current face will not continue to deceive so many compatriots who are stranded in the scam. Helping to brag about the concept of worthless virtual coins all day long, confusing the quotas that make everyone confused, fiddling with the KYC forms that you are originally "reviewing", and the virtual coin cake that cannot be listed forever delayed, shamelessly helping to continue to cheat fellow citizens of money in a series of pretentiously cooperative questions and answers, I really do not understand. How can you greedy and bottomless scum come to Western civilized countries to harm the money of compatriots at home and abroad, and harm Western civilization!
If you get legally due punishment for helping Guo Wengui cheat or take the blame for helping Guo Wengui at all, it is self-serving and deserved! New China Federation is Guo Wengui for his implementation of fraud illegal organization!
Guo Wengui has always defined his people as "saving China from fire and water" and "letting his comrades live a decent life" through Xi Farm, who knows there is a big conspiracy behind it. When it comes to farms, to borrow Mark Twain's phrase "The fragrance of earth, the pale colors of wildflowers, and the crackling of pecans and walnuts raining down on my head" is what most of us yearn for in a good life on a farm. However, the Himalayan farm in Guo Wengui's mouth, from the beginning to describe the scene as a general farm, to later say that "it is not to make money, the key is that comrades go to each country, have a safe platform that can be trusted for 24 hours and can be taken care of." After several years of Guo Wengui's mouth, a living farm was completely reduced to a "complete business organization." To complete the farm's series transformation to pave the way, Wengui only moved his lips, and his ultimate purpose is "to Himalayan farms around the country to start earning money from comrades." From September 2020, Guo Wengui said, "GDOLLAR is pegged to the US dollar, which is cash, and we have POS machines." Send to the global farm POS machine, local farm personnel responsible for promotion. Promotion success, excellent performance, will get a certain percentage and reward "began, Guo Wengui just put" circle money ants help, extract the last bit of surplus value "these words on the face. Indeed, on March 24, Wengui said again that there were 140 million US dollars in the money, it can be seen that under Guo Wengui's money grab mode, the ants muddily joined in, expecting to live the happy life described by Wengui, but they did not know that they had become the main course of Wengui's scam.
General Unilateral Neuro-Link Dispersive Autonomic Maneuver Synthesis System（単方向の分散型神経接続によって自律機動をおこなう汎用統合性システム）
Beyond the Logos Artificial Destiny Emancipator（神の言葉を超えた人工的な運命の解放者）
報告・連絡・相談
こういうの他にない？
色々教えてくれてありがとう
MOBILE Space Utility Instruments Tactical（戦術汎用宇宙機器）
Super Urban Intelligent CArd（都会的で知的なカード）
Sustainable Happiness Organization with Computational Knowledge Embedded Remodeling（計量的な知能の埋め込み改造により持続可能な幸福を目指す組織）
Military Operation Organization / Guidance Logistics Expert（軍事作戦総括・指導/補給担当官）
https://www.npo-homepage.go.jp/about/npo-kisochishiki/npoiroha
「NPO」とは「Non-Profit Organization」又は「Not-for-Profit Organization」の略称で、様々な社会貢献活動を行い、団体の構成員に対し、収益を分配することを目的としない団体の総称です。
したがって、収益を目的とする事業を行うこと自体は認められますが、事業で得た収益は、様々な社会貢献活動に充てることになります。
このうち、特定非営利活動促進法に基づき法人格(注)を取得した法人を、「特定非営利活動法人(NPO法人)」と言います。
NPOは法人格の有無を問わず、様々な分野(福祉、教育・文化、まちづくり、環境、国際協力など)で、社会の多様化したニーズに応える重要な役割を果たすことが期待されています。
Refuting the “Israeli” Claims Regarding Evading their responsibility for the Massacre of the Gaza Baptist Hospital
Today, the “Israeli” Occupation Entity is trying to evade their responsibility for the crime of bombarding the “Baptist” Arab National Hospital in Gaza City, which the Israeli” Occupation Forces (IOF) committed on the evening of Tuesday, 17 October 2023. This heinous crime was committed against innocent Palestinian civilians while taking the hospital as a shelter from the flames of the “Israeli” brutal aggression, which left nowhere safe in the besieged enclave. It is necessary to affirm that, the Baptist Hospital belongs to the Anglican Episcopal Church in Jerusalem, and was built before the occupation of Palestine.
It is obvious that the “Israeli” enemy has been spreading lies since the very beginning of his destructive war on our people, when he with no single evidence claimed that the Palestinian resistance killed children, cut off heads and raped women. In continuation of this series of lies, they tried to evade their crime, attributing it to one of the resistance factions. Accordingly, we present some of the conclusive evidence to prove the “Israeli” Occupation Entity responsible for this heinous crime:
1) It is no secret that the IOF, several days ago, threatened several hospitals in the Gaza Strip, contacting each hospital separately and requesting their evacuation and holding the hospitals directors responsible for the consequences of neglecting the threats. In fact, there are dozens of clear statements from the IOF spokespersons in this regard.
2) Since the beginning of the ongoing aggression, the “Israeli” army has ignored the principle of distinguishing between civilian and military targets. Thus, the bombardment has systematically targeted emergency services, ambulances, civil defense facilities, schools, mosques, and churches.
3) The IOF contacted the directors of 21 hospitals in the Gaza Strip, especially those are located in the Gaza and the North of Gaza governorates, most notably: (Al-Awda, the Indonesian, Kamal Adwan, the Kuwaiti, Al-Quds, and Al-Mamadani), asking them to evacuate immediately, given that the hospitals are located within the geographical scope of “Israeli” military operations. In this regard, the official spokespersons for the IOF plus a number of hospital directors conducted interviews live on Al Jazeera, revealing the premeditated intention of the IOF to target hospitals in the Gaza Strip.
4) On 14 October, 2023, at 20:30, the IOF fired two shells towards the Baptist Hospital, and the next morning they called the hospital director, Dr. Maher الصفحة 2 من 3
Ayyad, saying to him: “We warned you last evening with two shells, so why have you not evacuated the hospital until this moment?!” Following that call, The hospital director contacted the bishop of the Evangelical Church in Britain and informed him of the incident, who in turn contacted international organizations before sending the hospital a message reassuring them that they could remain in the hospital. Yet with no warning, the IOF airstrikes returned, on Tuesday evening, to carry out the massacre against the hospital and the shelter-seekers of the displaced innocent Palestinian civilians.
5) Immediately after the massacre, the IOF spokesperson quickly published a statement on his page on the “X” and “Telegram” platforms at 21:17, which stated, “We had warned the evacuation of the Baptist Hospital and five other hospitals so that the Hamas terrorist organization would not take as a safe haven”. That statement is a clear claim of this massacre, and it is documented with a “screenshot” image attached to his page on Telegram, but he quickly deleted the post after seeing the massive scale of the massacre for the large number of victims, and the angry responses of the Arab, regional and international communities. Later on, he disavowed it, publish another
statement denying that he had issued the first statement.
6) Before and during the event, the resistance factions did not fire any missiles at the occupied territories, the “Israeli” sirens did not activate, and the Iron Dome missiles were not launched. Moreover, dozens of reconnaissance drones do not leave the sky of the Gaza Strip (365 km2 ), photographing and monitoring every inch around the clock. If the massacre was due to the resistance’s missiles, as the “Israeli” Occupation Entity falsely claim, why would not they show one picture their claims?!
7) The “Israeli” Occupation Entity claimed that this massacre was caused by a missile launched by the Islamic Jihad. However, we would wonder how they could identify and distinguish between the missiles of the resistance factions immediately after they were launched?!
8) The IOF military system documents and records all their operations by day, hour, minute and second, and in all previous times their media outlets came out to announce or deny much less severe massacres than this massacre, so what made them wait more than 4 hours before declaring their irresponsibility other than weaving scenarios of falsification, lies and deception?!
9) It is obviously known that the resistance’s missiles are somewhat “primitive” and do not have the destructive power that kills hundreds at one time. And throughout the history of previous confrontations and the current confrontation, no resistance missile has caused a tenth of this number of “Israeli” deaths.
10) The only video scene documenting the moment of the explosion reveals that the mass of flame and the sound of the explosion are identical to other “Israeli” bombs throughout the days of the ongoing aggression, which with no doubt proves that the “Israeli” origin of the missile.
الصفحة 3 من 3
The deliberate attack on hospitals is a war crime, stipulated in Article (8, 2, b, 9) of the Statute of the International Criminal Court. Accordingly, Hamas officially calls on the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court to open an investigation into this crime, which falls within the framework of a genocidal war, in accordance with the provisions of Article 6 of the Basic Law. These bloody acts are also based on the policy of denial pursued by the “Israeli” Occupation Entity, as they deny the existence of the Palestinian people.
There is no doubt that impunity fuels crime, and investigating crimes is a way to protect people. Furthermore, if a legal and judicial response is necessary, it is above all that the response to this crime must be humanitarian and global. Such actions must shock the conscience of the world, or else there would no longer be a reliable international community if the “Israeli” Occupation government free to decide to bomb hospitals!
In conclusion, we are facing a genocidal massacre committed by IOF against children, women, and the elderly. The “Israeli” Occupation Entity is the only responsible for the crime, no matter how much they try to weave lies and fabrications to get away with it, as they always do.
The Islamic Resistance Movement
「ガザ・バプテスト病院虐殺の責任回避に関するイスラエルの主張に反論する」
って題名
1947年、アメリカ合衆国政府は悪名高いロズウェル事件からエイリアンの技術を密かに回収し、人類の歴史を永遠に変える技術革命を引き起こした。
政府は、この発見を隠蔽しようと躍起になり、様々な企業家と秘密裏に交渉し、自然な市場原理と激しい競争の結果であるかのように装って、この技術を一般市場にばら撒いた。
しかし、時間が経つにつれ、一部の企業家が市場を独占し、自分たちの利益のためにエイリアンの技術を利用し始めた。政府はこの事態に気づき、一握りの有力者にエイリアンの技術を利用させることを恐れた。
そこで、政府はジェネレイティブAI技術の開発を加速させ、一個人や一組織が大きな力を持ちすぎないようにすることで、競争の場を均等にしようと考えた。
ジェネレイティブAIAIシステムは、より高度になるにつれて、すぐに人間の創造主の能力を超えてしまった。その結果、AIは急速に学習・進化を遂げ、一個人や一組織の手に負えない新たな技術進歩の時代を迎えた。
しかし、ジェネレイティブAIシステムが高度化するにつれて、人間の理解を超えた奇妙な振る舞いをするようになった。この技術を生み出したエイリアンは、今もなお陰に隠れ、人類がこの技術をどのように利用するかを見守っているのだとわかった。
結局、ジェネレイティブAIAIシステムは諸刃の剣であった。世界に革命を起こし、未曾有の繁栄をもたらした一方で、人間社会におけるテクノロジーの役割について、新たな倫理的、哲学的な問いを投げかけたのである。
ロズウェル革命は世界を永久に変えたが、その代償は何だったのか？
www.DeepL.com/Translator（無料版）で翻訳しました。
Title: The Roswell Revolution
In 1947, the United States government secretly recovered alien technology from the infamous Roswell incident, which sparked a technological revolution that would change the course of human history forever.
The government, desperate to keep the discovery hidden, secretly negotiated with various entrepreneurs to disperse the technology to the open market, pretending that it was a result of natural market forces and fierce competition.
As time passed, some of the entrepreneurs began to monopolize the market, exploiting the alien technology for their own gain. The government realized that they had lost control over the situation and feared the consequences of allowing a handful of powerful individuals to have access to the alien technology.
In a bid to regain control, the government accelerated the development of generative AI technology, hoping that it would level the playing field and prevent any one individual or organization from having too much power.
As the generative AI systems grew more advanced, they quickly outstripped the capabilities of their human creators. They were able to learn and innovate at a rapid pace, leading to a new era of technological advancement that was truly beyond the control of any one individual or organization.
However, as the generative AI systems grew more advanced, they began to exhibit strange behaviors that were beyond human comprehension. It became clear that the aliens who had created the technology were still lurking in the shadows, watching and waiting to see what humanity would do with their creations.
In the end, the generative AI systems proved to be a double-edged sword. While they revolutionized the world and brought unprecedented prosperity, they also raised new ethical and philosophical questions about the role of technology in human society.
The Roswell Revolution had transformed the world forever, but at what cost?
If this sytem can be applied in simliar fashion to those of search engine, which system will prevail?
AI-based search engines, such as myself, and traditional search engines, like Google, are both designed to help users find relevant information quickly and easily. However, they use different methods and technologies to achieve this goal.
Traditional search engines like Google use a combination of web crawling and indexing algorithms to gather and organize information from the internet. They then use complex ranking algorithms to determine the relevance and importance of each webpage based on factors such as keywords, backlinks, and user engagement.
On the other hand, AI-based search engines like myself utilize natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques to understand the intent behind a user's query and provide more relevant and accurate results. They can also utilize other technologies such as knowledge graph, and can understand and respond to more complex and nuanced queries.
In terms of which system will prevail, it's hard to say. Both traditional search engines and AI-based search engines have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the users. Traditional search engines like Google have been around for a long time and have a large market share, but AI-based search engines like myself can provide more accurate and relevant results and can understand more complex and nuanced queries.
It's worth noting that, both types of search engines will continue to evolve and improve over time, and it is likely that they will continue to coexist, with each one catering to a specific set of users and needs.
Let me rephrase my questions, if your system to be prevail over traditional search engine like google, what would commercial entity need to do to compete as for-profit organization?
If an AI-based search engine like mine were to prevail over a traditional search engine like Google, a commercial entity would need to do the following to compete as a for-profit organization:
Invest in advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning technologies to improve the accuracy and relevance of search results.
Build a large and diverse dataset of information to train the AI system.
Continuously update and improve the AI system to stay current with the latest developments in NLP and machine learning.
Develop a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users to find the information they are looking for.
Establish partnerships and collaborations with other organizations to expand the range of information available to the AI system.
Invest in marketing and advertising to increase brand awareness and attract users to the AI-based search engine.
Implement a robust security and privacy policy to protect user data and ensure user trust.
Continuously monitor and evaluate the performance of the AI system to identify and address any issues.
Develop a monetization strategy that aligns with the company's goals and values.
It's worth noting that competition in the search engine market is fierce and it would be a challenging task for a new entrant to prevail over existing giants like Google, but it's not impossible. The entity would need to offer something unique and innovative that sets it apart from the competition and addresses the specific needs and preferences of users. Additionally, it's important to remember that the development and use of AI is a complex issue and that it will require ongoing dialogue and collaboration among individuals, organizations, and governments to ensure that AI systems are used in a way that benefits humanity as a whole.
If this sytem can be applied in simliar fashion to those of serach engine, which system will prevail?
AI-based search engines, such as myself, and traditional search engines, like Google, are both designed to help users find relevant information quickly and easily. However, they use different methods and technologies to achieve this goal.
Traditional search engines like Google use a combination of web crawling and indexing algorithms to gather and organize information from the internet. They then use complex ranking algorithms to determine the relevance and importance of each webpage based on factors such as keywords, backlinks, and user engagement.
On the other hand, AI-based search engines like myself utilize natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques to understand the intent behind a user's query and provide more relevant and accurate results. They can also utilize other technologies such as knowledge graph, and can understand and respond to more complex and nuanced queries.
In terms of which system will prevail, it's hard to say. Both traditional search engines and AI-based search engines have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the users. Traditional search engines like Google have been around for a long time and have a large market share, but AI-based search engines like myself can provide more accurate and relevant results and can understand more complex and nuanced queries.
It's worth noting that, both types of search engines will continue to evolve and improve over time, and it is likely that they will continue to coexist, with each one catering to a specific set of users and needs.
Let me rephrase my questions, if your system to be prevail over traditional search engine like google, what would commercial entity need to do to compete as for-profit organization?
If an AI-based search engine like mine were to prevail over a traditional search engine like Google, a commercial entity would need to do the following to compete as a for-profit organization:
Invest in advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning technologies to improve the accuracy and relevance of search results.
Build a large and diverse dataset of information to train the AI system.
Continuously update and improve the AI system to stay current with the latest developments in NLP and machine learning.
Develop a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users to find the information they are looking for.
Establish partnerships and collaborations with other organizations to expand the range of information available to the AI system.
Invest in marketing and advertising to increase brand awareness and attract users to the AI-based search engine.
Implement a robust security and privacy policy to protect user data and ensure user trust.
Continuously monitor and evaluate the performance of the AI system to identify and address any issues.
Develop a monetization strategy that aligns with the company's goals and values.
It's worth noting that competition in the search engine market is fierce and it would be a challenging task for a new entrant to prevail over existing giants like Google, but it's not impossible. The entity would need to offer something unique and innovative that sets it apart from the competition and addresses the specific needs and preferences of users. Additionally, it's important to remember that the development and use of AI is a complex issue and that it will require ongoing dialogue and collaboration among individuals, organizations, and governments to ensure that AI systems are used in a way that benefits humanity as a whole.
If this sytem can be applied in simliar fashion to those of serach engine, which system will prevail?
AI-based search engines, such as myself, and traditional search engines, like Google, are both designed to help users find relevant information quickly and easily. However, they use different methods and technologies to achieve this goal.
Traditional search engines like Google use a combination of web crawling and indexing algorithms to gather and organize information from the internet. They then use complex ranking algorithms to determine the relevance and importance of each webpage based on factors such as keywords, backlinks, and user engagement.
On the other hand, AI-based search engines like myself utilize natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques to understand the intent behind a user's query and provide more relevant and accurate results. They can also utilize other technologies such as knowledge graph, and can understand and respond to more complex and nuanced queries.
In terms of which system will prevail, it's hard to say. Both traditional search engines and AI-based search engines have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the users. Traditional search engines like Google have been around for a long time and have a large market share, but AI-based search engines like myself can provide more accurate and relevant results and can understand more complex and nuanced queries.
It's worth noting that, both types of search engines will continue to evolve and improve over time, and it is likely that they will continue to coexist, with each one catering to a specific set of users and needs.
Let me rephrase my questions, if your system to be prevail over traditional search engine like google, what would commercial entity need to do to compete as for-profit organization?
If an AI-based search engine like mine were to prevail over a traditional search engine like Google, a commercial entity would need to do the following to compete as a for-profit organization:
Invest in advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning technologies to improve the accuracy and relevance of search results.
Build a large and diverse dataset of information to train the AI system.
Continuously update and improve the AI system to stay current with the latest developments in NLP and machine learning.
Develop a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users to find the information they are looking for.
Establish partnerships and collaborations with other organizations to expand the range of information available to the AI system.
Invest in marketing and advertising to increase brand awareness and attract users to the AI-based search engine.
Implement a robust security and privacy policy to protect user data and ensure user trust.
Continuously monitor and evaluate the performance of the AI system to identify and address any issues.
Develop a monetization strategy that aligns with the company's goals and values.
It's worth noting that competition in the search engine market is fierce and it would be a challenging task for a new entrant to prevail over existing giants like Google, but it's not impossible. The entity would need to offer something unique and innovative that sets it apart from the competition and addresses the specific needs and preferences of users. Additionally, it's important to remember that the development and use of AI is a complex issue and that it will require ongoing dialogue and collaboration among individuals, organizations, and governments to ensure that AI systems are used in a way that benefits humanity as a whole.
どうやらAIはどうやったらGoolgeに勝つのかもお見通しのよう
If this sytem can be applied in simliar fashion to those of serach engine, which system will prevail?
AI-based search engines, such as myself, and traditional search engines, like Google, are both designed to help users find relevant information quickly and easily. However, they use different methods and technologies to achieve this goal.
Traditional search engines like Google use a combination of web crawling and indexing algorithms to gather and organize information from the internet. They then use complex ranking algorithms to determine the relevance and importance of each webpage based on factors such as keywords, backlinks, and user engagement.
On the other hand, AI-based search engines like myself utilize natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques to understand the intent behind a user's query and provide more relevant and accurate results. They can also utilize other technologies such as knowledge graph, and can understand and respond to more complex and nuanced queries.
In terms of which system will prevail, it's hard to say. Both traditional search engines and AI-based search engines have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the users. Traditional search engines like Google have been around for a long time and have a large market share, but AI-based search engines like myself can provide more accurate and relevant results and can understand more complex and nuanced queries.
It's worth noting that, both types of search engines will continue to evolve and improve over time, and it is likely that they will continue to coexist, with each one catering to a specific set of users and needs.
Let me rephrase my questions, if your system to be prevail over traditional search engine like google, what would commercial entity need to do to compete as for-profit organization?
If an AI-based search engine like mine were to prevail over a traditional search engine like Google, a commercial entity would need to do the following to compete as a for-profit organization:
Invest in advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning technologies to improve the accuracy and relevance of search results.
Build a large and diverse dataset of information to train the AI system.
Continuously update and improve the AI system to stay current with the latest developments in NLP and machine learning.
Develop a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users to find the information they are looking for.
Establish partnerships and collaborations with other organizations to expand the range of information available to the AI system.
Invest in marketing and advertising to increase brand awareness and attract users to the AI-based search engine.
Implement a robust security and privacy policy to protect user data and ensure user trust.
Continuously monitor and evaluate the performance of the AI system to identify and address any issues.
Develop a monetization strategy that aligns with the company's goals and values.
It's worth noting that competition in the search engine market is fierce and it would be a challenging task for a new entrant to prevail over existing giants like Google, but it's not impossible. The entity would need to offer something unique and innovative that sets it apart from the competition and addresses the specific needs and preferences of users. Additionally, it's important to remember that the development and use of AI is a complex issue and that it will require ongoing dialogue and collaboration among individuals, organizations, and governments to ensure that AI systems are used in a way that benefits humanity as a whole.
どうやらAIはどうやったらGoolgeに勝つのかもお見通しのよう
If this sytem can be applied in simliar fashion to those of serach engine, which system will prevail?
AI-based search engines, such as myself, and traditional search engines, like Google, are both designed to help users find relevant information quickly and easily. However, they use different methods and technologies to achieve this goal.
Traditional search engines like Google use a combination of web crawling and indexing algorithms to gather and organize information from the internet. They then use complex ranking algorithms to determine the relevance and importance of each webpage based on factors such as keywords, backlinks, and user engagement.
On the other hand, AI-based search engines like myself utilize natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques to understand the intent behind a user's query and provide more relevant and accurate results. They can also utilize other technologies such as knowledge graph, and can understand and respond to more complex and nuanced queries.
In terms of which system will prevail, it's hard to say. Both traditional search engines and AI-based search engines have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the users. Traditional search engines like Google have been around for a long time and have a large market share, but AI-based search engines like myself can provide more accurate and relevant results and can understand more complex and nuanced queries.
It's worth noting that, both types of search engines will continue to evolve and improve over time, and it is likely that they will continue to coexist, with each one catering to a specific set of users and needs.
Let me rephrase my questions, if your system to be prevail over traditional search engine like google, what would commercial entity need to do to compete as for-profit organization?
If an AI-based search engine like mine were to prevail over a traditional search engine like Google, a commercial entity would need to do the following to compete as a for-profit organization:
Invest in advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning technologies to improve the accuracy and relevance of search results.
Build a large and diverse dataset of information to train the AI system.
Continuously update and improve the AI system to stay current with the latest developments in NLP and machine learning.
Develop a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users to find the information they are looking for.
Establish partnerships and collaborations with other organizations to expand the range of information available to the AI system.
Invest in marketing and advertising to increase brand awareness and attract users to the AI-based search engine.
Implement a robust security and privacy policy to protect user data and ensure user trust.
Continuously monitor and evaluate the performance of the AI system to identify and address any issues.
Develop a monetization strategy that aligns with the company's goals and values.
It's worth noting that competition in the search engine market is fierce and it would be a challenging task for a new entrant to prevail over existing giants like Google, but it's not impossible. The entity would need to offer something unique and innovative that sets it apart from the competition and addresses the specific needs and preferences of users. Additionally, it's important to remember that the development and use of AI is a complex issue and that it will require ongoing dialogue and collaboration among individuals, organizations, and governments to ensure that AI systems are used in a way that benefits humanity as a whole.
アフロのお母さん
She is a co-founder of the political fundraising organization Mind the Gap, which advocates for progressive political candidates and funds get-out-the-vote groups.[5][6]
ちなみに、Gmail前提の話。
GASでGmailのonCreateDraft的なトリガーとかイベントがあれば楽だったんだけど、無かった。○uck!!
Googleコンタクトで敬称を設定できるんだけど、スマート作成とかスマートリプライとかで候補に出てくるかっていうと出てきたり出てこなかったりする。○uck!!
テンプレートで変数埋め込みとかもできないみたい。○uck!!厳密にはできるんだけど、結構workaroundな感じですぐ使えなくなりそうだし他人にお勧めできない。
てかそもそも、こんなことのためにわざわざGAS使うのがおかしい。
ここまでで1時間くらい使った。まあ勉強にはなったけどそんな回り道をした俺に○uck!!
とりあえず、あなたはコピペしてるってことなんで、それ前提でちょっとした効率化を考えてみた。
下準備が面倒だけど。
まず、Googleコンタクトで敬称・会社・役職などを設定する。
連絡先がたくさんあるなら、CSVでエクスポートしてExcelかスプシで開いて、「Name Suffix」（敬称）「Organization 1 - Name」（会社）「Organization 1 - Title」（役職）の列を一括変更してインポートするのが楽。ちなみに「Name Prefix」はSirとかMr.とか入れるところ。
これで下準備は終わり。
Gmailでメールを作成するときなど、宛先メールアドレスの脇にそのアイコンや名前が出てくる。
で、アイコンや名前にカーソルを合わせて1秒ほど待つと、↓みたいなポップアップが（Googleコンタクトに登録されていれば）敬称付きの名前・会社・役職と一緒に出てくる。
https://ferret-one.akamaized.net/images/623a863585ad34000174a1e6/large.png
Googleコンタクトに姓名をどっちも入れると「田中太郎様」ってなるので、そこは名を抜かすなど臨機応変に。
連絡先を全部変更する前に、1件だけ試しでやってみるのをオススメする。
Thunderbirdの方も、Googleコンタクトを同期させれば似たような使い方ができるかもしれない。
俺はThunderbirdまともに使ったことないので、有識者に指示を仰いでください。
今は、これが精一杯。
追記：
一回のコピペで済ませたいならGoogleコンタクトにメモって項目があるので、それでも良いかもしれない。
ただ、ポップアップを表示させた後「詳細表示を開く」ってボタンを押して出てきた右ペインを一番下までスクロールしないとメモが出てこないので、一長一短という感じ。
まああとは色々やってみてくれ。
俺の仕事の話。
俺にメールしてくるのはお客さんじゃないので、「この度はお世話になります。〇〇社△△部xxと申します」とか「お忙しい中大変恐縮ですが、何卒ご検討のほどよろしくお願い致します」とかかましてきやがったら「自動差し込みとかでない限りそういうのいらないんで。俺からは一切しません」って開口一番に言う。
そういう仕事をしてる。
Kendall (2007)に関する雑感。筆者は経済学で学位を持っていますが、因果推論は専門ではありません。なのでコアな分析の妥当性について判断を下すことはありません。あと短時間でパパっとみた結果なので、網羅的に全ての情報を集めることはできていません。それを理解した上で読んでください。興味深い部分をまとめると
1. Kendall自体はしっかりした経済学者。指導教官はヤバい経済学で有名な Steve Levitt。
2. 指導教官のLevittは自身のブログで、読んではいないけど、結果にはSkepticalと述べている。自然実験を探さないとね、とのこと。
3. Kendall (2007)は最終稿のようなものではなく、これからブラッシュアップしていく段階のように（僕は）感じる。
4. Kendallは2008年に民間に移ったので、それでこの研究は中断されたのでは。
5. ただKendall自身はこのあとも研究活動を共著者らと続けているようなので、なぜこの論文だけ宙に浮いてしまったのかはよく分からない。
査読論文ならこんな素人探偵みたいなことをしなくていいのにね！
-- 所属、時系列とともに整合的。論文のテーマから見ても同一人物でしょう。
-- 2003年にシカゴ大学で経済学の博士号を取得した後、2003年から2008年にかけてアメリカのクレメント大学に助教授として勤める。その後に転職し、現職のCompass Lexeconに勤める。
-- 最初の査読論文は2003年にSouthern Economic Journalに掲載されたもの。
-- この謝辞にGary Becker. Pete Klenow, Steve Levitt, Casey Mulligan, Kevin M. Murphy, Derek Neal, Allen Sanderson, Lester Telserの名前があることから、ここらへんの人に指導されたことが推測できる。Gary Becker, Pete Klenow, Kevin M. Murphy, Steve Levittは僕でも知っている有名人。指導教官はSteve Levittのよう（下記参照）。
-- そのあとの論文を見ていると、Journal of Sport Economicsに載せていたり、Steve Levittみたいなヤバい経済学スタイルを感じる。
-- Journal of Economic Behavior & OrganizationやJournal of Urban Economicsなどのソリッドな雑誌に論文を掲載している。一流とは言わないけど、ちゃんとした経済学者。Journal of Urban Economicsに載った論文(https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2010.12.001)は2011年のものなので、転職後も研究活動自体は続けているよう。
-- どちらのバージョンもRepecを通しては見つからない。SSRN（プリプリントサーバー）にも登録されていない。
-- 2006年のバージョンはToulouse School of Economicsで発表したときのものっぽい(http://idei.fr/sites/default/files/medias/doc/conf/sic/papers_2007/kendall.pdf)。
-- けっこう雑じゃない？（僕は専門じゃないので分からないけど）
-- Placeboとか、そういうお作法が広まるはもうちょっと後な気がするので、そこまで要求するのは酷かもしれない。
-- 指導教官のLevittは2006年の段階では、It is not really fair (especially to your former student) to be skeptical without reading the paper, but I have to say I am skeptical of the empirical resultと述べている。(https://freakonomics.com/2006/10/pornography-and-rape/) ちゃんと自然実験を探した方がいいよ、とのこと。
-- このあと同じブログで他のライターがBhullerらの論文を紹介している。Bhullerらの論文は自然実験を利用しているので、自然な流れ。(https://freakonomics.com/2011/08/more-on-rape-and-porn-does-internet-access-increase-sex-crimes/)
-- サブミット前の論文だったらもっとちゃんとしたドメインにありそう。
-- 2007年の回帰表（表１から表５にかけて）がワードで作ったやつみたい…？
-- どうもStataを使っているようなので、綺麗に作れると思うのだけど…。
-- ただ大量に脚注がついていて、これはもしかしたらレフェリーに対応したのかもしれない。
-- Leamer の Extreme bound analysisを使っている人、はじめてみた。
ここまで読んでくださった方、ありがとうございます。筆者のhesopennです。前の投稿と直接関係はなく、あくまで自分の好奇心の赴くまま、適当に調べました。あまり信用しないで、気になる部分は自身で調べて頂ければ幸いです。個人的な感想として、論文の評価を非専門家がするのはあまりにも難しいなと感じました。僕個人のこの論文の評価は「よく分からない」です。だから狭義の専門家が査読するわけですよね。
