Well, let's examine it more closely... First of all, it's well known that individual gang members first gained the trust of girls. As such, it's not an exaggeration to say that, in the intermediate period of the relationship, the girls were, in fact, smitten with the offender who would later exploit them. (This is actually a matter of record, which is why the activity in question is referred to as 'grooming'.) Now this kind of activity might have been subject to more public exposure. It could be postulated that, prior to the more severe exploitation, there may have been some community witnesses to this kind of 'boyfriend model' of grooming, though the scope of bystander observation and apprehension of it still remains uncertain.As such, I do not think the example given is far flung if we consider that such a relationship, of itself, may be categorized as CSE. A family member of a perp may have been privy to this and this alone, oblivious to the more severe acts that occurred elsewhere. Considering these elements, the analogy is not as bad as you imagine.Now that this has been more precisely fleshed out, would you still react the same way?Replies: @Phil Barker
Your analogy was just terrible.
�
Incidentally, you just happened to fabricate a scenario where nobody really knows anything except that a doting young British girl is pursuing a relationship with a grown “Asian” man, just two sweethearts having a go. What’s the harm? And you consider this a good-faith concession.
A family member of a perp may have been privy to this and this alone, oblivious to the more severe acts that occurred elsewhere.
Perhaps. That is a possibility. However, it is also possible that a friend or family member could have known about the more severe acts, or they could have suspected them. Isn’t that a distinct possibility in sexual exploitation rings which operate for multiple years and have nothing to do with Pakistanis or Muslims? I would say, “Yes, that is certainly possible, even if we’re not talking about Pakistanis or Muslims, and everyone who knew the suspects covered their own ass.”
But you excluded these possibilities entirely from your scenario. We’re talking about a gang of criminals operating for multiple years with many victims. I have this nagging feeling that you wouldn’t set the constraints on what was possible, or even plausible, if the community in question comprised Mormons or Catholics of non-Middle Eastern ancestry.
I’ll repeat what I stated earlier:
I also think it’s unlikely that anyone would defend all these community leaders, whether they be Muslims, Jews, or Mennonites, with the same amount of gusto. In fact, I think it is likely that people would vigorously defend them, condemn them, or say nothing, based on their own perceived self-interest.
You don't think forcibly raping a bunch of girls radically changes that "ethical quandary"?
a relationship with a 15 year old girl who seems to dote on him.
�
If he participated in a rape gang, then he deserves to have his life ruined. If he knew about a rape gang and covered it up, then he deserves to have his life ruined. And comparing that to having "a relationship with a 15 year old girl who seems to dote on him" is just suspect.Replies: @muh muh
‘Would you rush to have your family member arrested, possibly convicted and incarcerated for many years, thereby ruining his life, or would you seek to handle the matter without recourse to law enforcement officials?’
�
Your analogy was just terrible.
Well, let’s examine it more closely…
First of all, it’s well known that individual gang members first gained the trust of girls. As such, it’s not an exaggeration to say that, in the intermediate period of the relationship, the girls were, in fact, smitten with the offender who would later exploit them. (This is actually a matter of record, which is why the activity in question is referred to as ‘grooming’.)
Now this kind of activity might have been subject to more public exposure. It could be postulated that, prior to the more severe exploitation, there may have been some community witnesses to this kind of ‘boyfriend model’ of grooming, though the scope of bystander observation and apprehension of it still remains uncertain.
As such, I do not think the example given is far flung if we consider that such a relationship, of itself, may be categorized as CSE. A family member of a perp may have been privy to this and this alone, oblivious to the more severe acts that occurred elsewhere. Considering these elements, the analogy is not as bad as you imagine.
Now that this has been more precisely fleshed out, would you still react the same way?
Perhaps. That is a possibility. However, it is also possible that a friend or family member could have known about the more severe acts, or they could have suspected them. Isn't that a distinct possibility in sexual exploitation rings which operate for multiple years and have nothing to do with Pakistanis or Muslims? I would say, "Yes, that is certainly possible, even if we're not talking about Pakistanis or Muslims, and everyone who knew the suspects covered their own ass."
A family member of a perp may have been privy to this and this alone, oblivious to the more severe acts that occurred elsewhere.
�
I also think it’s unlikely that anyone would defend all these community leaders, whether they be Muslims, Jews, or Mennonites, with the same amount of gusto. In fact, I think it is likely that people would vigorously defend them, condemn them, or say nothing, based on their own perceived self-interest.
�
No, that is not 'the only reason' I could be asking the question, since I clearly described the allegation as speculative. As such, neither you nor anyone else can infer the analogy 'accurately parallels the actions and biases of the grooming gang situation' in any way, shape or form.There is the realm of possibility and there is the realm of what is certain. Thus far, those raising Cain about the matter reside firmly in the former, trafficking heavily in conjecture. They have no actual evidence to substantiate their allegations that Muslim leaders or many others were aware of the matter and said and did nothing to prevent it.So, without confirming their conjecture, I entertain a possibility and ask the question in accordance with it. However imperfect the comparison may seem, it nevertheless addresses an ethical quandary common to both possibilities, which is to say, 'Would you rush to have your family member arrested, possibly convicted and incarcerated for many years, thereby ruining his life, or would you seek to handle the matter without recourse to law enforcement officials?'Replies: @Phil Barker
The only reason you could be asking me this is because you perceive it to be an analogy which accurately parallels the actions and biases of the grooming gang situation, perhaps just on a different scale.
�
Your analogy was just terrible. This is how you presented a comparable “crime”:
a relationship with a 15 year old girl who seems to dote on him.
You don’t think forcibly raping a bunch of girls radically changes that “ethical quandary”?
I’ll answer this question:
‘Would you rush to have your family member arrested, possibly convicted and incarcerated for many years, thereby ruining his life, or would you seek to handle the matter without recourse to law enforcement officials?’
If he participated in a rape gang, then he deserves to have his life ruined. If he knew about a rape gang and covered it up, then he deserves to have his life ruined. And comparing that to having “a relationship with a 15 year old girl who seems to dote on him” is just suspect.
Well, let's examine it more closely...First of all, it's well known that individual gang members first gained the trust of girls. As such, it's not an exaggeration to say that, in the intermediate period of the relationship, the girls were, in fact, smitten with the offender who would later exploit them. (This is actually a matter of record, which is why the activity in question is referred to as 'grooming'.)Now this kind of activity might have been subject to more public exposure. It could be postulated that, prior to the more severe exploitation, there may have been some community witnesses to this kind of 'boyfriend model' of grooming, though the scope of bystander observation and apprehension of it still remains uncertain.As such, I do not think the example given is far flung if we consider that such a relationship, of itself, may be categorized as CSE. A family member of a perp may have been privy to this and this alone, oblivious to the more severe acts that occurred elsewhere. Considering these elements, the analogy is not as bad as you imagine.Now that this has been more precisely fleshed out, would you still react the same way?Replies: @Phil Barker
Your analogy was just terrible.
�
The only reason you could be asking me this is because you perceive it to be an analogy which accurately parallels the actions and biases of the grooming gang situation, perhaps just on a different scale.
No, that is not ‘the only reason’ I could be asking the question, since I clearly described the allegation as speculative. As such, neither you nor anyone else can infer the analogy ‘accurately parallels the actions and biases of the grooming gang situation’ in any way, shape or form.
There is the realm of possibility and there is the realm of what is certain. Thus far, those raising Cain about the matter reside firmly in the former, trafficking heavily in conjecture. They have no actual evidence to substantiate their allegations that Muslim leaders or many others were aware of the matter and said and did nothing to prevent it.
So, without confirming their conjecture, I entertain a possibility and ask the question in accordance with it. However imperfect the comparison may seem, it nevertheless addresses an ethical quandary common to both possibilities, which is to say, ‘Would you rush to have your family member arrested, possibly convicted and incarcerated for many years, thereby ruining his life, or would you seek to handle the matter without recourse to law enforcement officials?’
You don't think forcibly raping a bunch of girls radically changes that "ethical quandary"?
a relationship with a 15 year old girl who seems to dote on him.
�
If he participated in a rape gang, then he deserves to have his life ruined. If he knew about a rape gang and covered it up, then he deserves to have his life ruined. And comparing that to having "a relationship with a 15 year old girl who seems to dote on him" is just suspect.Replies: @muh muh
‘Would you rush to have your family member arrested, possibly convicted and incarcerated for many years, thereby ruining his life, or would you seek to handle the matter without recourse to law enforcement officials?’
�
The only reason you could be asking me this is because you perceive it to be an analogy which accurately parallels the actions and biases of the grooming gang situation, perhaps just on a different scale. But I don’t see it that way, so I disagree on the premise. However, the analogy itself might be useful for illustrating how two different groups with differing self-interests can perceive the same events in very different ways.
No, that is not 'the only reason' I could be asking the question, since I clearly described the allegation as speculative. As such, neither you nor anyone else can infer the analogy 'accurately parallels the actions and biases of the grooming gang situation' in any way, shape or form.There is the realm of possibility and there is the realm of what is certain. Thus far, those raising Cain about the matter reside firmly in the former, trafficking heavily in conjecture. They have no actual evidence to substantiate their allegations that Muslim leaders or many others were aware of the matter and said and did nothing to prevent it.So, without confirming their conjecture, I entertain a possibility and ask the question in accordance with it. However imperfect the comparison may seem, it nevertheless addresses an ethical quandary common to both possibilities, which is to say, 'Would you rush to have your family member arrested, possibly convicted and incarcerated for many years, thereby ruining his life, or would you seek to handle the matter without recourse to law enforcement officials?'Replies: @Phil Barker
The only reason you could be asking me this is because you perceive it to be an analogy which accurately parallels the actions and biases of the grooming gang situation, perhaps just on a different scale.
�
Look at the child sexual abuses among Mormons, in the cTholic churches ,by the US army across the world starting from WW2, study the sexual abuses of the pre teens in Iraq under US occupation, remind yourself the child sexual abuses by Epstein gang , sex trafficking in Las Vegas and Hollywood, sexual crimes inflicted in adults then forget all about the above and find an author to amplify X message on the billboards on the highways.
Yes, all of it deserves to be called out.
And here we are yet again, trading accusations just as the usual suspects would have us do while they laugh all the way to the proverbial bank.
*sigh*
Here’s another thought experiment…
Let’s say a close male family member of yours — say, in his twenties or thirties — is involved in a relationship with a 15 year old girl who seems to dote on him. You’re angered by his conduct, but you love him nonetheless and don’t wish to see him ruined for the rest of his life should law enforcement become aware of his affair.
How do you approach the matter?
So when you say “debunkedâ€, do you mean that the community leaders were unaware of this criminal activity as it was happening? The evidence being that after it was reported, they condemned it?
I would say any evidence to the contrary is entirely speculative.
Both immunological theory and Vaccine immunization methods were invented by ancient Chinese at least 1572 C.E.(明代医å¦å®¶ä¸‡å…¨ï¼ˆ1499–1582)在其著作《痘疹心法》ä¸è¯¦ç»†è®°å½•äº†äººç—˜æŽ¥ç§çš„方法。人痘预防天花å¯èƒ½åœ¨å®‹æœå‘明,也有å¯èƒ½æºäºŽæ™‹æœã€‚ç›®å‰å¦ç•Œå…¬è®¤çš„说法是明æœéš†åº†å¹´é—´ï¼ˆ1567-1572),安徽太平县(今黄山市黄山区)人å‘明了人痘接ç§æœ¯ã€‚
1727年,清æœäººä¿žèŒ‚鲲曾著《痘科金镜赋集解》,说“ç§ç—˜æ³•èµ·äºŽæ˜Žéš†åº†å¹´é—´å®å›½åºœå¤ªå¹³åŽ¿ï¼Œå§“æ°å¤±è€ƒã€‚
至明末清åˆï¼Œè‹å·žåœ°æ–¹å®˜å‘˜ç”šè‡³å¯ä»¥æ‰¹å‡†åŒ»ç”Ÿè¡ŒåŒ»ï¼Œè¦æ±‚达到95%çš„æˆçŽ‡),first transfered to russian Royal family by Qing Royal family,then rest of European continent,until a British Doctor found cowpox replacing old also more dangerous methods of nasal inhalation of humanpox.
Yeah, fuck Tommy Robinson too. Another third world non boot licker, provided they aren’t Muslims, of course.
From the links muh muh provided
people of Pakistani heritage in our country are equally sickened by these crimes and fear being tarred with the same brush.
Communities fear backlash as far-right seeks to “exploit the exploitation”
That says it all. It says nowhere that they care about the raped, tortured and exploited white girls. They only care about themselves hence the fear of backlash. A backlash which never comes.
Well OK, they were “sickened”. Officially in their statements to the media.
One other matter I'd like to add, and I believe this is more important than anything else discussed here...Even if stats were to show that a given ethnic group's crimes were disproportionately represented when compared to other groups, one would have to demonstrate how the phenomenon of those crimes constitutes an existential threat to others in order to warrant the kind of action 'tulips' advocates.So if less than 5% of a cohort is responsible for criminal activity, it beggars the imagination to think this is some kind of persuasive argument for rounding up the remaining 95% and consigning them to internment camps, expelling them, etc., etc.That's really the crux of this argument, and for as much as Musk or Robinson try to advance that kind of nonsense, I'm quite confident they're going to fail and fail miserably.Which is really all that matters.Replies: @Commentator Mike, @Tiptoethrutulips
You’ll note I haven’t returned to ‘tulips’ the kind of copypasta he’s dished out here. The reason for that is twofold:1) it does nothing to diminish the seriousness of the offenses to which he refers, and
2) it usually gets relegated to little more than reflexive whataboutery, unnecessarily congesting the thread.
�
You’ll note I haven’t returned to ‘tulips’ the kind of copypasta he’s dished out here. The reason for that is twofold:
1) you mean to say it can’t be refuted?
2) if you prefer pithy hit & run commentary, why don’t you cease in your efforts to argue with me? Fly away, Pelican…but here you are. Again. Still.
Afzal joins Mehdi Hasan
Mehdi Hasan? He’s whinging about a rewriting of history? I wonder what he says about the history of Muslim slave raiding/conquest in Africa and Europe? [a little more whataboutery, such as whatabout all the mainstream history that vilifies Europeans and obscures/denies the sins and myriad atrocities committed by non-Europeans? There are no deleterious repercussions for these false narratives? Is it all relative or isn’t it?]
What say you, Pelican, about the term/history of the Houris? Islamic Sexual Enslavement is mitzvah…
Copypasta: For the eighth century’s Nicetas Byzantinos, a Greek historian, the Koran was “full of blasphemies against the Most High, with all its ugly and vulgar filth,†particularly its claim that heaven amounted to a “sexual brothel.â€Â
The rewriting of history is, to a great extent, the cause of the current quagmire in the West, but please do focus on the plight of the Muslim invaders…let’s throw the Haitians in, too – that’s what really matters – who is most apt to wreak havoc and destroy the classic enemy of Jewry? How about the entire lot?
Even if stats were to show that a given ethnic group’s crimes were disproportionately represented
That’s exactly what the stats do/did show.
What say you about the irrelevant stats that show that Jews are/were over-represented in the pornography industry? What about Jewish over-representation in the ownership/management of American media? In the presidential cabinets? Are we/have we been asked/directed to look the other way on that particular ethnic over-representation because it’s potentially hurtful to the innocents amongst Jewry? On those matters, which matter NOT (?), should we just fly away?
How about a little howaboutism? How’s that working out for us? (Ignoring/refusing to accept the obvious on a principle not accorded to Whites, as a group, by every other ethnic nation)
constitutes an existential threat – demonstrate how the phenomenon of those crimes constitutes an existential threat to others
Well, what is the existential threat, exactly? The pending ruination of England/America? Or, the protection and elevation of various out-groups at the expense of European people/nations for the ultimate ruination of England/America? Political and cultural displacement for all European-blooded peoples? A Pakistani troll is the mayor of London. Nothing to see there….
The reports of Organized Rapery by “Asians†emerged in the 70’s – long before the October 7 Holocaust of 6! Jews in Israel by “Asians†from Palestine.
Labour MP Ann Cryer reported: Rotherham report ‘reduced me to tears’, says MP who exposed abuse decades ago.
When Ann Cryer tried to bring abusers in her Yorkshire seat to justice, she was shunned by police, social services and imams…
More Copypastaism – feel free to fact-check –
Oxford Paedophile Ring: Former Labour MP Ann Cryer Blames ‘Cultural Practices’ From Pakistan
A former Labour MP has blamed the Oxford paedophile ring on “cultural practices” that have been “imported” from Pakistan.
Ann Cryer was criticised after drawing parallels with the abuse in Oxford and what she claimed was the Pakistani attitude towards women.
Seven men were found guilty of a catalogue of offences after the Old Bailey heard how the vulnerable schoolgirls were plucked from the streets and care homes to be drugged, raped and sold into prostitution.
Five of the men were of British Pakistani origin, and two were from North Africa.
But Cryer, who has campaigned on child grooming issues, said: “It’s cultural practices that have been imported into this country from Pakistan and we must not lose sight of that fact.
Then a year later in 2004 came ‘Edge of the City,’ a Channel 4 documentary about social workers in Bradford.
Hours before transmission it was yanked from the schedules. [I assert that a story on blue-collar White guys doing same would NOT have been yanked off air, just like the matter of the Knoxville Horror, which occurred in the land of White StickPeople, was NOT a national story because the perpetrators were NOT White]
Unite Against Fascism, The 1990 Trust, and the National Assembly Against Racism lobbied Channel 4 to drop it, as did the Chief Constable of West Yorkshire.
The local elections were coming up. And the film captured grooming gangs for the first time. South Asian men abusing teenage white girls. They were worried that the BNP, who were making a lot of noise about the abuse gangs, would profit.
[in the] small town of Rotherham…
Almost all the victims were white, most of the abusers were Pakistani. And that’s despite them only making up just 5% of the town.
Pakistani British councillors had wielded unusual power, and they had used it to head off concerns. People who tried to raise concerns were silenced with bogus accusations of racism.
Andrew Norfolk at The Times…In 2010 he heard a radio report about a grooming gang in Manchester.
He started going through archives. What he found was a pattern.
Since 1997 there had been 17 cases in 13 towns where a group of men had approached a girl on the street and groomed her.
Of the 56 convicted, 3 were white, 53 were Asian.
50 of those had Muslim names, most were Pakistani.
But when he went to the authorities, they refused to talk.
He was accused of being a racist and an Islamophobe.
Kevin MacDonald:
Nevertheless, nothing was done to stop it. As Tobias Langdon notes, White sex criminals do their deeds secretly and in private because they are well aware that such behavior is looked on with horror by the vast majority of other Whites.…
However, Pakistan is a typical Middle Eastern collectivist culture, so the emphasis is on supporting one’s own kinship group, no matter what. This is also the case in the Orthodox Jewish community, another typical Middle Eastern collectivist culture…
An unhealthy brand of politics “imported” from Pakistan is partly to blame for the cover-up of mass child abuse in Rotherham and other British cities…
Simon Danczuk…said a culture of intimidation and closing of ranks within parts of the Asian community had mired politics in towns and cities across northern England for years.
He said Asian councillors were under constant pressure from the community to “conform”…
“There are cultural issues around the way politics are done in the Asian community…
He said he had personally come under pressure from Asian councillors and members of the community for speaking out as well as being warned by prominent figures in his party.
He pointed to the way in which two Muslim councillors in Rochdale had provided character references for one of the perpetrators of the Rochdale abuse…
In a nutshell, like Jews, they stick together, regardless of what their co-ethnics are up to. If these groups seek to undermine White society/culture, which they mostly do, what are we to do about it?
Squawk! 🕶ï¸
Your best argument yet.
Except these allegations were debunked a long time ago.https://twitter.com/DillyHussain88/status/1878154971629101106Replies: @Phil Barker, @barr
Doesn’t being aware of evil and allowing evil to happen make one as evil as the perpetrator, if not more so? Those community leaders know what goes on in their community and allowed it to happen.
�
Look at the child sexual abuses among Mormons, in the cTholic churches ,by the US army across the world starting from WW2, study the sexual abuses of the pre teens in Iraq under US occupation, remind yourself the child sexual abuses by Epstein gang , sex trafficking in Las Vegas and Hollywood, sexual crimes inflicted in adults then forget all about the above and find an author to amplify X message on the billboards on the highways.
254🙈
251👀🤬
That says it all. It says nowhere that they care about the raped, tortured and exploited white girls. They only care about themselves hence the fear of backlash. A backlash which never comes.Well OK, they were "sickened". Officially in their statements to the media.
people of Pakistani heritage in our country are equally sickened by these crimes and fear being tarred with the same brush.Communities fear backlash as far-right seeks to "exploit the exploitation"
�
Yes, all of it deserves to be called out.
Look at the child sexual abuses among Mormons, in the cTholic churches ,by the US army across the world starting from WW2, study the sexual abuses of the pre teens in Iraq under US occupation, remind yourself the child sexual abuses by Epstein gang , sex trafficking in Las Vegas and Hollywood, sexual crimes inflicted in adults then forget all about the above and find an author to amplify X message on the billboards on the highways.
�
a Hollywood movie as a psyop.
Very true.
I recently noticed that they were eager to make an Hollywood version of Three Body Problem. It seems that why they did it was so that they depict a malevolent version of the “CCP”/CPC, rather than the much more measured version in the China version.
If the West only invested the same effort in improving the lives of their people, rather than putting effort into Painting Narratives (aka propaganda), they would be so much better off today.
As a thought experiment, let’s say there was a sex-trafficking operation being run out of a community of self-segregated Jews in New Jersey. Let’s say it has been going on for years, maybe involving over 100 people, and there were even unofficial rumors circulating throughout the greater society the entire time. Then one day it gets reported in the news and becomes a big headline. The Jewish community leaders waste no time condemning the heinous, but isolated, actions of a few wayward souls, which they knew nothing about. Probably a lot of people would believe them, especially people who like Jews or people who perceive Jews to be a community that deserves good public relations. I, however, would be more skeptical of their claims of innocence.
And just to show that my skepticism in this case is not coming from a place of unbridled Jew-hatred, let’s say it was a community of self-segregated German Mennonites where this ‘rape gang’ was operating from. I would still be highly skeptical that the community leaders were totally unawares that this activity was going on right under their noses. I guess you could say I look upon clannish minority communities with more suspicion since I suspect they are more likely to rationalize dissimulation because they perceive themselves to be an isolated group under siege.
I also think it’s unlikely that anyone would defend all these community leaders, whether they be Muslims, Jews, or Mennonites, with the same amount of gusto. In fact, I think it is likely that people would vigorously defend them, condemn them, or say nothing, based on their own perceived self-interest.
Except these allegations were debunked a long time ago.https://twitter.com/DillyHussain88/status/1878154971629101106Replies: @Phil Barker, @barr
Doesn’t being aware of evil and allowing evil to happen make one as evil as the perpetrator, if not more so? Those community leaders know what goes on in their community and allowed it to happen.
�
So when you say “debunked”, do you mean that the community leaders were unaware of this criminal activity as it was happening? The evidence being that after it was reported, they condemned it? I guess I would be more surprised if they “praised” the crime or acknowledged any awareness of it, since that would probably be self-incriminating, and people generally try to avoid that.
I would say any evidence to the contrary is entirely speculative.
So when you say “debunkedâ€, do you mean that the community leaders were unaware of this criminal activity as it was happening? The evidence being that after it was reported, they condemned it?
�
Doesn’t being aware of evil and allowing evil to happen make one as evil as the perpetrator, if not more so? Those community leaders know what goes on in their community and allowed it to happen.
Except these allegations were debunked a long time ago.
Muslim leaders and imams have been condemning child sexual grooming gangs perpetrated by Muslims for the last 12 years.
This is despite the fact that none of the perpetrators in any of the cases cited Quran, hadith or Islamic justifications for their crimes. https://t.co/GqXuX5z1Kq pic.twitter.com/vyW80QTi7G
— Dilly Hussain (@DillyHussain88) January 11, 2025
One other matter I'd like to add, and I believe this is more important than anything else discussed here...Even if stats were to show that a given ethnic group's crimes were disproportionately represented when compared to other groups, one would have to demonstrate how the phenomenon of those crimes constitutes an existential threat to others in order to warrant the kind of action 'tulips' advocates.So if less than 5% of a cohort is responsible for criminal activity, it beggars the imagination to think this is some kind of persuasive argument for rounding up the remaining 95% and consigning them to internment camps, expelling them, etc., etc.That's really the crux of this argument, and for as much as Musk or Robinson try to advance that kind of nonsense, I'm quite confident they're going to fail and fail miserably.Which is really all that matters.Replies: @Commentator Mike, @Tiptoethrutulips
You’ll note I haven’t returned to ‘tulips’ the kind of copypasta he’s dished out here. The reason for that is twofold:1) it does nothing to diminish the seriousness of the offenses to which he refers, and
2) it usually gets relegated to little more than reflexive whataboutery, unnecessarily congesting the thread.
�
Doesn’t being aware of evil and allowing evil to happen make one as evil as the perpetrator, if not more so? Those community leaders know what goes on in their community and allowed it to happen. I presume a considerable proportion of the community was aware of it too, including the extended families and friends of the groomers. Had any of these Pakistanis demonstrated, protested or rioted against the grooming gangs? But they demonstrate, protest and riot against whatever they perceive as a threat to their community. They don’t care about the White girls that were raped and tortured. They clearly put themselves out to be enemies of the societies they inhabit, as do many other of these immigrants groups. Sure there are minor exceptions, as to every rule.
The same goes for most of those White politicians, social workers and cops. The fact that they talk so much about these girls being daughters of single mothers, vulnerable, impressionable, drug addicts, etc. also implies that they care less about them than if they came from decent middle class families and were kidnapped on the street. Surely everyone deserves to be protected … except the perpetrators and their vast army of immigrant and politician supporters, those turning a blind eye, cops, etc. But then who is threatening them?
Except these allegations were debunked a long time ago.https://twitter.com/DillyHussain88/status/1878154971629101106Replies: @Phil Barker, @barr
Doesn’t being aware of evil and allowing evil to happen make one as evil as the perpetrator, if not more so? Those community leaders know what goes on in their community and allowed it to happen.
�
Pakistani groomers.There was no under reporting of Asian groomers and as I have said this was made up to be a tool to a divide the communities and demonise the Muslims again.I have, living in England most of my life, been following this media manipulation around "Grooming Gangs", a label created specifically for Asians / Pakistanis back when it since it first started.
But proving the under reporting of white on white pedophilia doesn’t disprove the under reporting of the
�
All paedophile rings are grooming gangs, unless using victims that didn’t require “grooming”. Pakistani grooming gangs are specific in the ethnic composition of perps and victims.
Using that term they could say that 100 percent of members of Grooming Gangs were Pakistani “Muslims†even though the gangs also contained Sikhs, Hindus and a few white people.
You could say the same thing about the population of Pakistan. So what?
These supposedly decent Pakistanis now coming out complaining about how these rape gangs are presented in the media, why didn’t they gang up in their own community and put a stop to these gangs, why didn’t they protest and demonstrate against the rape gangs and demand that the police and authorities take action? No, most of them turned a blind eye, or rather sneered at the victims and had an inner laugh, or joined the friends and extended families rioting in support of the perps at the courts when these gangs were eventually tried and convicted.
I certainly agree with the latter half of your statement, but even in the Zeteo vid to which you link, Nazir Afzal points to said negligence in reporting on behalf of police (around the 28:00 mark). Earlier in the interview, he also mentions how some victims reported that officers treated them condescendingly, indicating class discrimination.
There was no under reporting of Asian groomers and as I have said this was made up to be a tool to a divide the communities and demonise the Muslims again.
�
I have yet to see a single example of a Pakistani gang involved in something so unspeakably evil.
Revealed: child sex abuse gang 'with tentacles that go round the world'
Seven members of a paedophile gang were involved in the rape and abuse of babies, toddlers and children in attacks that were streamed on the internet and seen on every continent.
The sex ring – described as having “tentacles that go round the world†– preyed on the families of the children they targeted, in one case grooming a mother and father before their baby was born. [...]
Ian Glover, senior investigating officer, said: “We’ve encountered grooming where the family have been groomed prior to birth of the baby. They go in that early with the sole intention of abusing that baby once it’s born.â€
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/apr/22/child-sex-paedophile-abuse-gang-revealed-trial-two-convictions
�
You’ll note I haven’t returned to ‘tulips’ the kind of copypasta he’s dished out here. The reason for that is twofold:
1) it does nothing to diminish the seriousness of the offenses to which he refers, and
2) it usually gets relegated to little more than reflexive whataboutery, unnecessarily congesting the thread.
One other matter I’d like to add, and I believe this is more important than anything else discussed here…
Even if stats were to show that a given ethnic group’s crimes were disproportionately represented when compared to other groups, one would have to demonstrate how the phenomenon of those crimes constitutes an existential threat to others in order to warrant the kind of action ‘tulips’ advocates.
So if less than 5% of a cohort is responsible for criminal activity, it beggars the imagination to think this is some kind of persuasive argument for rounding up the remaining 95% and consigning them to internment camps, expelling them, etc., etc.
That’s really the crux of this argument, and for as much as Musk or Robinson try to advance that kind of nonsense, I’m quite confident they’re going to fail and fail miserably.
Which is really all that matters.
1) you mean to say it can’t be refuted?
You’ll note I haven’t returned to ‘tulips’ the kind of copypasta he’s dished out here. The reason for that is twofold:
�
Mehdi Hasan? He’s whinging about a rewriting of history? I wonder what he says about the history of Muslim slave raiding/conquest in Africa and Europe? [a little more whataboutery, such as whatabout all the mainstream history that vilifies Europeans and obscures/denies the sins and myriad atrocities committed by non-Europeans? There are no deleterious repercussions for these false narratives? Is it all relative or isn’t it?]What say you, Pelican, about the term/history of the Houris? Islamic Sexual Enslavement is mitzvah…Copypasta: For the eighth century’s Nicetas Byzantinos, a Greek historian, the Koran was “full of blasphemies against the Most High, with all its ugly and vulgar filth,†particularly its claim that heaven amounted to a “sexual brothel.â€Â The rewriting of history is, to a great extent, the cause of the current quagmire in the West, but please do focus on the plight of the Muslim invaders…let’s throw the Haitians in, too - that’s what really matters - who is most apt to wreak havoc and destroy the classic enemy of Jewry? How about the entire lot?
Afzal joins Mehdi Hasan
�
That’s exactly what the stats do/did show. What say you about the irrelevant stats that show that Jews are/were over-represented in the pornography industry? What about Jewish over-representation in the ownership/management of American media? In the presidential cabinets? Are we/have we been asked/directed to look the other way on that particular ethnic over-representation because it’s potentially hurtful to the innocents amongst Jewry? On those matters, which matter NOT (?), should we just fly away? How about a little howaboutism? How’s that working out for us? (Ignoring/refusing to accept the obvious on a principle not accorded to Whites, as a group, by every other ethnic nation)
Even if stats were to show that a given ethnic group’s crimes were disproportionately represented
�
Well, what is the existential threat, exactly? The pending ruination of England/America? Or, the protection and elevation of various out-groups at the expense of European people/nations for the ultimate ruination of England/America? Political and cultural displacement for all European-blooded peoples? A Pakistani troll is the mayor of London. Nothing to see there….The reports of Organized Rapery by “Asians†emerged in the 70’s - long before the October 7 Holocaust of 6! Jews in Israel by “Asians†from Palestine.Labour MP Ann Cryer reported: Rotherham report 'reduced me to tears', says MP who exposed abuse decades ago.
constitutes an existential threat - demonstrate how the phenomenon of those crimes constitutes an existential threat to others
�
Your best argument yet.
Squawk! 🕶ï¸
�
All these problems of uncivil, unclean, unintelligent scum flooding into our formerly civilized country began with goddamn Lyndon Johnson. As soon as Kennedy was dead then, right away, 1964, we were given the Vietnam War and replacement of the National Origins Formula, which restricted immigration to northern and western Europeans, with https://cis.org/Report/HartCeller-Immigration-Act-1965. It is clear what needs to be done. The truth must be presented on television so than Americans can see and comprehend it, and that means wresting Hollywood from the Jews.
I certainly agree with the latter half of your statement, but even in the Zeteo vid to which you link, Nazir Afzal points to said negligence in reporting on behalf of police (around the 28:00 mark). Earlier in the interview, he also mentions how some victims reported that officers treated them condescendingly, indicating class discrimination.
There was no under reporting of Asian groomers and as I have said this was made up to be a tool to a divide the communities and demonise the Muslims again.
�
I have yet to see a single example of a Pakistani gang involved in something so unspeakably evil.
Revealed: child sex abuse gang 'with tentacles that go round the world'
Seven members of a paedophile gang were involved in the rape and abuse of babies, toddlers and children in attacks that were streamed on the internet and seen on every continent.
The sex ring – described as having “tentacles that go round the world†– preyed on the families of the children they targeted, in one case grooming a mother and father before their baby was born. [...]
Ian Glover, senior investigating officer, said: “We’ve encountered grooming where the family have been groomed prior to birth of the baby. They go in that early with the sole intention of abusing that baby once it’s born.â€
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/apr/22/child-sex-paedophile-abuse-gang-revealed-trial-two-convictions
�
It looks obvious now that political correctness didn’t play the role in said under-reportage that many here claim it had.
Admittedly, I include myself in this.
That’s the thing about keeping an open mind: you have to be willing to admit you might be wrong, which isn’t always an easy thing to do, but when you think about it, it provides an opportunity to learn something new, which isn’t so bad after all.
Pakistani groomers.There was no under reporting of Asian groomers and as I have said this was made up to be a tool to a divide the communities and demonise the Muslims again.I have, living in England most of my life, been following this media manipulation around "Grooming Gangs", a label created specifically for Asians / Pakistanis back when it since it first started.
But proving the under reporting of white on white pedophilia doesn’t disprove the under reporting of the
�
There was no under reporting of Asian groomers and as I have said this was made up to be a tool to a divide the communities and demonise the Muslims again.
I certainly agree with the latter half of your statement, but even in the Zeteo vid to which you link, Nazir Afzal points to said negligence in reporting on behalf of police (around the 28:00 mark). Earlier in the interview, he also mentions how some victims reported that officers treated them condescendingly, indicating class discrimination.
However…
It looks obvious now that political correctness didn’t play the role in said under-reportage that many here claim it had.
Rather, it seems law enforcement has demonstrated a degree of negligence in its pursuit of CSE offenses regardless of the ethnicity of the perpetrator, with some notorious cases involving British politicians. (!) What’s more, judges have given conspicuously lenient sentences to primarily white convicts.
Add to this the data available in your ‘Making a Monster’ article, which includes numerous cases of white men committing egregious collective CSE offenses that should, for all intents and purposes, be categorized as ‘grooming gangs’, and it’s obvious there’s glaring racial bias when comparing media reportage of these instances against those of Pakistani offenders:
You’ll note I haven’t returned to ‘tulips’ the kind of copypasta he’s dished out here. The reason for that is twofold:
1) it does nothing to diminish the seriousness of the offenses to which he refers, and
2) it usually gets relegated to little more than reflexive whataboutery, unnecessarily congesting the thread.
That said, the rabbit hole that article led me down includes some pretty harrowing stuff, such as this:
Revealed: child sex abuse gang ‘with tentacles that go round the world’
Seven members of a paedophile gang were involved in the rape and abuse of babies, toddlers and children in attacks that were streamed on the internet and seen on every continent.
The sex ring – described as having “tentacles that go round the world†– preyed on the families of the children they targeted, in one case grooming a mother and father before their baby was born. […]
Ian Glover, senior investigating officer, said: “We’ve encountered grooming where the family have been groomed prior to birth of the baby. They go in that early with the sole intention of abusing that baby once it’s born.â€
I have yet to see a single example of a Pakistani gang involved in something so unspeakably evil.
In any event, thanks for those timely links! They certainly put paid to a lot of falsehoods recently bandied about these environs.
And, in case I forgot, happy new year!
Admittedly, I include myself in this.That's the thing about keeping an open mind: you have to be willing to admit you might be wrong, which isn't always an easy thing to do, but when you think about it, it provides an opportunity to learn something new, which isn't so bad after all.
It looks obvious now that political correctness didn’t play the role in said under-reportage that many here claim it had.
�
One other matter I'd like to add, and I believe this is more important than anything else discussed here...Even if stats were to show that a given ethnic group's crimes were disproportionately represented when compared to other groups, one would have to demonstrate how the phenomenon of those crimes constitutes an existential threat to others in order to warrant the kind of action 'tulips' advocates.So if less than 5% of a cohort is responsible for criminal activity, it beggars the imagination to think this is some kind of persuasive argument for rounding up the remaining 95% and consigning them to internment camps, expelling them, etc., etc.That's really the crux of this argument, and for as much as Musk or Robinson try to advance that kind of nonsense, I'm quite confident they're going to fail and fail miserably.Which is really all that matters.Replies: @Commentator Mike, @Tiptoethrutulips
You’ll note I haven’t returned to ‘tulips’ the kind of copypasta he’s dished out here. The reason for that is twofold:1) it does nothing to diminish the seriousness of the offenses to which he refers, and
2) it usually gets relegated to little more than reflexive whataboutery, unnecessarily congesting the thread.
�
Have you ever wondered why David Woods was and is not allowed to speak at Tommy Robinson’s demonstrations?
With Tommy’s stance on “Free Speech” and how strongly he advocates for it reminding us time amd time again that people should be allowed to say what they want including himself then surely he should have noproblem with allowing David Woods to do just that 🤔.
14-year-old Charlene Downes, who was raped and prostituted by Muslims in the Labour constituency of Blackpool before being murdered by her Muslim “boyfriends†and probably turned into kebab-meat..
She was pimped out and abused by her own family members and their circle of right wing Peadophiles.
https://www.vice.com/en/article/murder-charlene-downes-blackpool/
https://uk.pinterest.com/edlnews/the-downes-files/
What happened to Charlene Downes?
byu/Adventurous-Sale-671 inTrueCrimePodcasts
Because Kaney West lived not to tell his story.
But proving the under reporting of white on white pedophilia doesn’t disprove the under reporting of the
Pakistani groomers.
There was no under reporting of Asian groomers and as I have said this was made up to be a tool to a divide the communities and demonise the Muslims again.
I have, living in England most of my life, been following this media manipulation around “Grooming Gangs”, a label created specifically for Asians / Pakistanis back when it since it first started.
Using that term they could say that 100 percent of members of Grooming Gangs were Pakistani “Muslims” even though the gangs also contained Sikhs, Hindus and a few white people. The term Child Sexual Explotation which is the main term used for abuse was only used in realtion to none Asian /Pakistanis.
The below article sheds light on this.
Making a Monster: How The Times Created the Asian ‘Grooming Gang’
Origins of the Asian Grooming Gang.
On the 5th of January, 2011, The Times newspaper launched an exclusive four-page exposé on the “sexual exploitation of hundreds of young British girls by criminal pimping gangsâ€. The article claimed that “child protection experts†had identified a separate category of sex offending which The Times labelled “on-street groomingâ€, and that within this profile “most of the victims are white†and that “most of the convicted offenders are of Pakistani heritageâ€..
Below an interview with Nazir Afzal who.
If you follow Elon Musk on Twitter, you might have a very distorted picture of one of the UK’s most controversial issues right now: child grooming gangs.
“He [Musk] is completely rewriting history,†says Nazir Afzal, the former Chief Crown Prosecutor for North West England, who prosecuted some of the most high profile cases in the country, including ones against British child sexual abusers of Pakistani heritage.
In his first on-camera interview since Musk started attacking several British officials with accusations of failing to prosecute gangs responsible for crimes against children, Afzal joins Mehdi Hasan for a Town Hall Q&A to discuss the history of this decades-old issue in the UK
As you more or less said this is a psy-op by the Zionists to distract from the Holocaust taking place in Palestine and to demonise the Muslims. But for all of their schemes and plotting this will back fire on them in a big way Godwilling
I certainly agree with the latter half of your statement, but even in the Zeteo vid to which you link, Nazir Afzal points to said negligence in reporting on behalf of police (around the 28:00 mark). Earlier in the interview, he also mentions how some victims reported that officers treated them condescendingly, indicating class discrimination.
There was no under reporting of Asian groomers and as I have said this was made up to be a tool to a divide the communities and demonise the Muslims again.
�
I have yet to see a single example of a Pakistani gang involved in something so unspeakably evil.
Revealed: child sex abuse gang 'with tentacles that go round the world'
Seven members of a paedophile gang were involved in the rape and abuse of babies, toddlers and children in attacks that were streamed on the internet and seen on every continent.
The sex ring – described as having “tentacles that go round the world†– preyed on the families of the children they targeted, in one case grooming a mother and father before their baby was born. [...]
Ian Glover, senior investigating officer, said: “We’ve encountered grooming where the family have been groomed prior to birth of the baby. They go in that early with the sole intention of abusing that baby once it’s born.â€
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/apr/22/child-sex-paedophile-abuse-gang-revealed-trial-two-convictions
�
You could say the same thing about the population of Pakistan. So what? These supposedly decent Pakistanis now coming out complaining about how these rape gangs are presented in the media, why didn't they gang up in their own community and put a stop to these gangs, why didn't they protest and demonstrate against the rape gangs and demand that the police and authorities take action? No, most of them turned a blind eye, or rather sneered at the victims and had an inner laugh, or joined the friends and extended families rioting in support of the perps at the courts when these gangs were eventually tried and convicted.
Using that term they could say that 100 percent of members of Grooming Gangs were Pakistani “Muslims†even though the gangs also contained Sikhs, Hindus and a few white people.�
They are called grooming gangs for a reason and that reason is actually not to cover up reality, at least not from the outset.
These victims were not abducted by strangers, it was more like psychological operations where girls from poor families and bad circumstances -often already in foster homes or institutions- were given attention and gifts, then it gradually escalated and ended up in sex-slavery and forced prostitution.
We might as well call them rape gangs, true, but the term grooming is fitting for how the girls ended up within their reach.
The media propagates that Kurds are the good Muslims.
They were part of it too.
Girls, drugged and gang-raped under a Kurdish flag
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4777086/The-community-shame-predators.html
Yes, so they should all get themselves back posthaste. Pakistan needs Pakistanis; England/America does not.
Except for Pakistan, of course.
�
Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars
Safe to say most nations have an interest in keeping their citizenry at home, even if they don’t compel them to do so.
�
No, I think your “meandering†is indicative of my overall point - common behaviors can be discerned amongst people of a same/similar ethnic group (race/ethnicity sometimes overlaps, yes?), notwithstanding the behaviors generally common to all people. So, Germans and Swedes are similar in appearance/behaviors/intellect; so are Nigerians and Bantus, although Nigerians often assert that Bantus are amongst the worst of the Africans. Compared to Germans, Nigerians and Bantus are little different, in my opinion. Compared to England, Pakistan may as well be Africa.
You’re still stuck in the notion that ‘Pakistani’ and ‘Afghani’ constitute distinct ethnic cohorts rather than nationalities.
�
An ethnic cleansing campaign on its own soil? Or, internment based on race/ethnicity? A little of both…
Could you tell us when the last time Britain engaged in a similar kind of campaign on its own soil?
�
The Muslims/Moors weren’t innocent then; nor are they today. [Another swipe at Muslims, but is it really random? Are Muslims in Middle East/Asia, like modern Europeans, to be held to account for their history?]
When this Venetia returned home to the Emperor, the Emperor ordered him to build a ship; and several English-men, that were newly taken slaves, he caused to draw timber in a cart from Memora to Salley… like so many oxen, driving and whipping of them in a very barbarous manner.
The name of Venetia caused me to insert this here, to show the barbarous cruelty of this inhumane wretch…but I took my passage for England… at last delivered from under the hands of this inhumane tyrant and his hellish crew of Negroes; beseeching Almighty God, that all my country-men, in all their affairs and negotiations, may ever escape from his cruel hands. [Francis Brooks, 1693, […] Under The Tryanny of Mully Ishmael, Emperor of Morocco…in Barbary
�
The reason it was deemed racist to report on the identities of the groomers was because they were Pakistanis/Muslims/Not-White. That’s the general proof of the ethnicity/race of the offenders. Then there’s all those photographs…
It shouldn’t be. Completely agreed.
�
What you seem to be suggesting is that we sit around and do (mostly) nothing until their numbers (Pakistanis, Africans, et al) further swell and their crimes exponentially increase in severity and frequency, then we act, whilst we hope all the while that Magic Dirt Syndrome kicks in and they just eventually stop being who/what they inherently are, which is NOT European. (The issues they bring to European society is not just criminal, btw, but for the sake of brevity…) So, shall we use Pelican’s daughter/granddaughter-child as our guinea pig whilst we wait it out? Mary-Ann Leneghan and Kriss Donald say, for God’s sake, no. Pava LaPere says, I sacrificed my waste-of-a-life for retributive justice because I was stuffed with lies and false narratives about history and White Peoples.
If we aggregate these numbers and compare them to the general population of Pakistani
�
Define ethnic cleansing.
Please provide evidence that Bukele is engaged in a campaign of ethnic cleansing.
�
Pelican… Pelican… Pelican… Pelican… Pelican…
Squawk! 🕶ï¸
Why do you need muh muh or anyone? Did Pakistan raise a hell against Musk? Did it raise an outcry against the far right blind leading bastard who fails to see the hand of Israel in its demonstration ?
How many times did US force to release without charges its rapist in Japan, Iraq and in Phillipines? I don’t have data for Latin American ’s sufferrings by American rapists.
Did Not Israel force the release of its rapist committed by its tourists in Europe?
Did this bastard show any anger at the influence of Chief Rabbi who spoke to police and persuaded it disallow pro-Palestinain march ?
Why this Musk bastard is trying to bring H1 low skilled tech and dispatch the locally trained to a pasture?
He is talking about rapes to distract attention to his rapes of America and Europe.
Why doesn’t this bastard talk of rapes of detainees by Israeli IDF whose survival depends on US?
Now Pakistan should do one thing –
1- Dont acknowldege copy right of X and build one
2 Don’t allow Starlink ( if Tik Tok can be handled by US at Israeli persuasion , Pakistan Indonesia India Malaysia should do same to Google facebook Amazon and X . I dont have to start or say. Its already being discussed in Indonesia and Pakistan ).
3 It should know Starlink is a Trojan’s mule and it will spy on Pakistanin nuke.
Except for Pakistan, of course.Safe to say most nations have an interest in keeping their citizenry at home, even if they don't compel them to do so.
No one is worried over fewer Pakistanis in Pakistan.
�
You're still stuck in the notion that 'Pakistani' and 'Afghani' constitute distinct ethnic cohorts rather than nationalities. What you should be doing is examining the Pashtun ethnic cohort, since this cohort transcends the boundaries between northwest Pakistan and southern Afghanistan.Based on my own research, bacha bazi is more prevalent among irreligious Pashtuns.
Do you observe similarities in Pakistani/Afghani cultural/national practices?
�
Well, I agree about stronger enforcement of already existing laws. No problem.But the last time Americans engaged in anything remotely resembling an ethnic cleansing campaign on its own soil was back in the 19th century, and not only were Native American populations not removed wholesale, they were also accorded tracts of territory regarded as autonomous nations to this day. What's more, they're also considered to be American citizens with all the rights conferred upon individuals living outside the confines of reservations.Could you tell us when the last time Britain engaged in a similar kind of campaign on its own soil?
My position is there should be no Pakistani population in England/ America, and yes, many could be expelled, and those who remain could be forced to stop their predations, and the lack of respect for English culture/authority could be curtailed. It’s been done in the past; have we somehow lost all ability to defend ourselves?
�
It shouldn't be. Completely agreed.
So, WHY was it racist to report on the ethnicity of the Groomers?
�
That doesn't track with the 2021 ONS stats online:https://i.imghippo.com/files/AhzQ1451VTs.png
2021 – The town of Rochdale’s population…its ethnic makeup was 57.2% White, 34.3% Asian.
�
You miss the point.I have no problem reporting on the ethnicity of perps nor the disproportionate representation of any given ethnic group in crime stats. None whatsoever.But there's a big difference between acknowledging these reports and using them to justify an ethnic cleansing campaign, the latter of which you're admittedly seeking to spearhead.In order to do that, you'd first have to provide a stat showing how many British citizens/residents of Pakistani descent actually commit these crimes. We could zoom out even further and look at how many such people commit felony offenses in general. If we aggregate these numbers and compare them to the general population of Pakistani Brits, I'd venture to say that we're looking at less than 3% of that group. That's not a ratio likely to persuade enough people to realize your objective. Feel free to prove my estimate wrong, by the way. I'm entirely open to that possibility.
How does denying the issue of disproportionate black/brown violence/crime/low IQ/inherent resentment/dysfunctional proclivities help us?
�
Oh?Please provide evidence that Bukele is engaged in a campaign of ethnic cleansing.Replies: @Commentator Mike, @Tiptoethrutulips
Have you seen what’s going on in El Salvador? The impossible, according to you, is happening therein.
�
Except for Pakistan, of course.
Yes, so they should all get themselves back posthaste. Pakistan needs Pakistanis; England/America does not.
Safe to say most nations have an interest in keeping their citizenry at home, even if they don’t compel them to do so.
Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars
Mexico Institute
Understanding Mexico’s Changing Immigration Laws
Laura V. González-Murphy
Mexico is a country of emigration and immigration but the Mexican government’s policy toward Mexicans who have emigrated, particularly those in the United States, stands in stark contrast to how the government treats immigrants on Mexican territory. While Mexican policymakers demand openness from the United States, the Mexican government not only limits the rights of foreigners but immigrants are often subject to human rights violations by the Mexican police and immigration officials, as well as fall victim to violent criminals…
Illegal Immigration Is Illegal: Mexico Disagrees
@ Gateway Pundit By Antonio Graceffo
Mar. 23, 2024
The second-largest source of income for Mexican drug cartels is human trafficking into the U.S… The cartels have so much sway over the Mexican government that even the country’s president is speaking out against Texas laws countering illegal immigration.
Alejandro Arcos, the Mayor of Chilpancingo, Mexico Is Beheaded Six Days After Taking Office – Head Found on Truck
By Gateway Hispanic Oct. 8, 2024
[So, are Pakistanis in Mexico, too? Ha! Just kidding, Pelican – I included this story just to take a swipe at Mestizos/Mexico…]
You’re still stuck in the notion that ‘Pakistani’ and ‘Afghani’ constitute distinct ethnic cohorts rather than nationalities.
No, I think your “meandering†is indicative of my overall point – common behaviors can be discerned amongst people of a same/similar ethnic group (race/ethnicity sometimes overlaps, yes?), notwithstanding the behaviors generally common to all people. So, Germans and Swedes are similar in appearance/behaviors/intellect; so are Nigerians and Bantus, although Nigerians often assert that Bantus are amongst the worst of the Africans. Compared to Germans, Nigerians and Bantus are little different, in my opinion. Compared to England, Pakistan may as well be Africa.
Could you tell us when the last time Britain engaged in a similar kind of campaign on its own soil?
An ethnic cleansing campaign on its own soil? Or, internment based on race/ethnicity? A little of both…
During World War I, the United Kingdom used concentration camps to control those they could not or would not bring before the courts: men who had committed no offense besides belonging to the wrong nationality or ethnic group. Among these were Germans and Austrians living in Britain as well as Irish citizens suspected of disloyalty to the crown.
In June 1940, with a German invasion expected at any moment, Prime Minister Winston Churchill decided to arrest every German and Austrian in the country and send them all to concentration camps. To those who reminded him that many of these people were Jewish refugees, he responded briefly and memorably: “Collar the lot!â€
The Native Americans, who readily slaughtered/tortured/genocided other Native Americans in their endeavors to conquer more territory/acquire assets, got a spanking from a superior foe and then whined about “human rights,†which was a concept previously unknown to the (mostly) savage lot. So, apartheid arrived for the Red Man, which was more generous than what they customarily doled out to their co-ethnic enemies. Apartheid is an underrated/much maligned policy; regarding those plucky Pakistanis, deportation is a better option. Cultural/civil apartheid would work, too.
When this Venetia returned home to the Emperor, the Emperor ordered him to build a ship; and several English-men, that were newly taken slaves, he caused to draw timber in a cart from Memora to Salley… like so many oxen, driving and whipping of them in a very barbarous manner.
The name of Venetia caused me to insert this here, to show the barbarous cruelty of this inhumane wretch…but I took my passage for England… at last delivered from under the hands of this inhumane tyrant and his hellish crew of Negroes; beseeching Almighty God, that all my country-men, in all their affairs and negotiations, may ever escape from his cruel hands. [Francis Brooks, 1693, […] Under The Tryanny of Mully Ishmael, Emperor of Morocco…in Barbary
The Muslims/Moors weren’t innocent then; nor are they today. [Another swipe at Muslims, but is it really random? Are Muslims in Middle East/Asia, like modern Europeans, to be held to account for their history?]
It shouldn’t be. Completely agreed.
The reason it was deemed racist to report on the identities of the groomers was because they were Pakistanis/Muslims/Not-White. That’s the general proof of the ethnicity/race of the offenders. Then there’s all those photographs…
If we aggregate these numbers and compare them to the general population of Pakistani
What you seem to be suggesting is that we sit around and do (mostly) nothing until their numbers (Pakistanis, Africans, et al) further swell and their crimes exponentially increase in severity and frequency, then we act, whilst we hope all the while that Magic Dirt Syndrome kicks in and they just eventually stop being who/what they inherently are, which is NOT European. (The issues they bring to European society is not just criminal, btw, but for the sake of brevity…) So, shall we use Pelican’s daughter/granddaughter-child as our guinea pig whilst we wait it out? Mary-Ann Leneghan and Kriss Donald say, for God’s sake, no. Pava LaPere says, I sacrificed my waste-of-a-life for retributive justice because I was stuffed with lies and false narratives about history and White Peoples.
Please, Pelican – we have to throw the brown/black babies out with the bathwater. There is no other way. Jews go, too. There are many ways to do this without overt Genocide! We could do to them what’s currently being done to us…only, we have truth/reality on our side (mostly).
Please provide evidence that Bukele is engaged in a campaign of ethnic cleansing.
Define ethnic cleansing.
Have you been to London or Paris lately?
What happened to all the White People in Detroit, Baltimore, St. Louis, Memphis, Mississippi…you don’t exactly see piles of white corpses everywhere, yet Whites are mostly gone.
Oh, Pelican, you seem to be arguing exactly what “Our†enemies have spent decades inculcating us to believe – all (non-Jewish) ethnic groups/races should just try to get along and accept our differences graciously, unless we’re using European norms as the measure in European nations, of course, then we must resist our insistence upon European/White supremacy – safe streets; good schools; functioning electrical grids and first-world infrastructure be damned. And, the Jews are trying to keep us at each others throats, except when they’re trying to teach us to just get along…
Squawk! 🕶ï¸
Pelican... Pelican... Pelican... Pelican... Pelican...
�
Housebuilding? 😆 Indians do no physical work whatsoever, skilled or unskilled. You must not know anything about Indians.
Surely a racist carnt like you should be top of any obnoxious table.
Actually the ones who understand Indian Civilisation the least are the Indians. This is because they are given to whimsical thinking. They confuse what they wish to be so, with what is so.--------------------------------You must know that I do not bother to read more than a few of your sentences, so if you wish to impress me, you have to make your point succintly, rather than indulge in the CHARACTERISTICALLY INDIAN PENCHANT for extremely LENGTHY AND VERBOSE rants.Simply put, you Indians TALK WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY TOO MUCH.Do more, and talk less. That way maybe you won't be so butthurt/jealous about the Chinese.Replies: @showmethereal, @Xavier
the Chinese seem to be the one who understand Indian Civilization the least
�
Actually the ones who understand Indian Civilisation the least are the Indians.
Thank you.
This is because they are given to whimsical thinking. They confuse what they wish to be so, with what is so.
Precisely. One of the most central teachings of the Buddha is to see things for what they are. Indians simply can’t do that because behind their grievances lies the acute butthurt and insecurity of the brahmin caste. Most Indians themselves don’t understand the source of their own anger. It’s amusing to hear low caste Hindus whine about how central asian Muslims destroyed their temples when their own grandparents wouldn’t have been welcome in those temples. The Indian’s failing is pride and envy. The slogan for Hindutva is: गरà¥à¤µ से कहो हम हिनà¥à¤¦à¥‚ हैं (say with pride “we are Hindus”). They themselves don’t know what exactly they should be proud of, but pride is their drug.
How the British pulled off a $45 trillion heist in India….
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/india/independence-day-how-the-british-pulled-off-a-45-trillion-heist-in-india/articleshow/102746097.cms?from=mdr
I’m just looking at the issue differently than most people. Remember when Trump said he was going to “crackdown” on MS-13 gangs coming from Latin America? I think that’s a good comparison to what Tommy is saying. Ultimately, targeted initiatives such as that do not diminish the demand for mass immigration, nor do they stop the various pipelines of migrants coming in from all over the world.
I'm not sure about that. Many poor Third World countries depend on the remittances of their overseas workers and immigrants, and encourage their citizens to go overseas.Replies: @muh muh
Safe to say most nations have an interest in keeping their citizenry at home, even if they don’t compel them to do so.
�
I’m not sure about that. Many poor Third World countries depend on the remittances of their overseas workers and immigrants, and encourage their citizens to go overseas.
It’s true true they benefit from sending students abroad, though most of them are keen upon having those students return. It isn’t just money these countries are looking for. They usually intend to educate many of them in American/European universities and then retain them at home, lest they suffer a brain drain.
As for other workers, they’re here primarily to earn for both themselves and their families back home, but any given country can’t afford too great an exodus of its citizens.
That’s just basic economics at play.
A liar and an idiot.
Since there is so little opposition to immigration and the crimes committed by all immigrants, any help is welcome even if it doesn’t cover all the immigrant groups but only some of them. No?
Except for Pakistan, of course.Safe to say most nations have an interest in keeping their citizenry at home, even if they don't compel them to do so.
No one is worried over fewer Pakistanis in Pakistan.
�
You're still stuck in the notion that 'Pakistani' and 'Afghani' constitute distinct ethnic cohorts rather than nationalities. What you should be doing is examining the Pashtun ethnic cohort, since this cohort transcends the boundaries between northwest Pakistan and southern Afghanistan.Based on my own research, bacha bazi is more prevalent among irreligious Pashtuns.
Do you observe similarities in Pakistani/Afghani cultural/national practices?
�
Well, I agree about stronger enforcement of already existing laws. No problem.But the last time Americans engaged in anything remotely resembling an ethnic cleansing campaign on its own soil was back in the 19th century, and not only were Native American populations not removed wholesale, they were also accorded tracts of territory regarded as autonomous nations to this day. What's more, they're also considered to be American citizens with all the rights conferred upon individuals living outside the confines of reservations.Could you tell us when the last time Britain engaged in a similar kind of campaign on its own soil?
My position is there should be no Pakistani population in England/ America, and yes, many could be expelled, and those who remain could be forced to stop their predations, and the lack of respect for English culture/authority could be curtailed. It’s been done in the past; have we somehow lost all ability to defend ourselves?
�
It shouldn't be. Completely agreed.
So, WHY was it racist to report on the ethnicity of the Groomers?
�
That doesn't track with the 2021 ONS stats online:https://i.imghippo.com/files/AhzQ1451VTs.png
2021 – The town of Rochdale’s population…its ethnic makeup was 57.2% White, 34.3% Asian.
�
You miss the point.I have no problem reporting on the ethnicity of perps nor the disproportionate representation of any given ethnic group in crime stats. None whatsoever.But there's a big difference between acknowledging these reports and using them to justify an ethnic cleansing campaign, the latter of which you're admittedly seeking to spearhead.In order to do that, you'd first have to provide a stat showing how many British citizens/residents of Pakistani descent actually commit these crimes. We could zoom out even further and look at how many such people commit felony offenses in general. If we aggregate these numbers and compare them to the general population of Pakistani Brits, I'd venture to say that we're looking at less than 3% of that group. That's not a ratio likely to persuade enough people to realize your objective. Feel free to prove my estimate wrong, by the way. I'm entirely open to that possibility.
How does denying the issue of disproportionate black/brown violence/crime/low IQ/inherent resentment/dysfunctional proclivities help us?
�
Oh?Please provide evidence that Bukele is engaged in a campaign of ethnic cleansing.Replies: @Commentator Mike, @Tiptoethrutulips
Have you seen what’s going on in El Salvador? The impossible, according to you, is happening therein.
�
Safe to say most nations have an interest in keeping their citizenry at home, even if they don’t compel them to do so.
I’m not sure about that. Many poor Third World countries depend on the remittances of their overseas workers and immigrants, and encourage their citizens to go overseas.
It's true true they benefit from sending students abroad, though most of them are keen upon having those students return. It isn't just money these countries are looking for. They usually intend to educate many of them in American/European universities and then retain them at home, lest they suffer a brain drain.As for other workers, they're here primarily to earn for both themselves and their families back home, but any given country can't afford too great an exodus of its citizens.That's just basic economics at play.
I’m not sure about that. Many poor Third World countries depend on the remittances of their overseas workers and immigrants, and encourage their citizens to go overseas.
�
All this genuflecting from a man (Woods) who thinks it would be a great idea if England became Muslim. Did he mean white Muslims? Kinda doubt it. Just another third worlder in pro white clothing, much like his butt buddy Nick ‘the dick’ fountain. Swiping left.
The above is one of the biggest lies we have been fed in relation to why the abuse was and is still swept under the carpet. It plays well into the dividing of communities in the England and sadly fall for it including the TommyTards.
Allegation that gang members aren’t arrested due to political correctness.
�
Okay, nice work, Anonymous 1.
But proving the under reporting of white on white pedophilia doesn’t disprove the under reporting of the Pakistani groomers. It would make more sense to say that both are true, which would be consistent with general law enforcement negligence in the UK.
Frankly, I find the moral posturing of someone like Elon Musk to be the epitome of hypocrisy. Leaving aside his own sordid family affairs, he’s clearly trying to divert attention away from the vitriol he received while promoting Operation Hindutva Deluge. That’s really all this is.
I mean, the colossal douchebag continues to hold Israel’s balls even while they’re committing criminal offenses of a far greater magnitude than anything a tiny minority of Pakistani Brits ever have.
It’s just too damn transparent.
Pakistani groomers.There was no under reporting of Asian groomers and as I have said this was made up to be a tool to a divide the communities and demonise the Muslims again.I have, living in England most of my life, been following this media manipulation around "Grooming Gangs", a label created specifically for Asians / Pakistanis back when it since it first started.
But proving the under reporting of white on white pedophilia doesn’t disprove the under reporting of the
�
Ethnicity, as it relates to culture/politics/social norms, is/should be of utmost concern, especially in nations currently subjected to deliberate demographic replacement, which can be narrowed down to ONLY western/White nations. No one is worried over fewer Pakistanis in Pakistan.
If ethnicity is your concern, how is this ‘meandering’?
�
Agreed. How about tedious? You accused me of trolling, which implies arguing for the pure sake of arguing, with no honest intentions or purpose, so here’s one final troll - tedious.
This is, quite frankly, getting tiresome
�
My position is there should be no Pakistani population in England/ America, and yes, many could be expelled, and those who remain could be forced to stop their predations, and the lack of respect for English culture/authority could be curtailed. It’s been done in the past; have we somehow lost all ability to defend ourselves?
Now I don’t deny this ethnic cohort may be over-represented relative to their general numbers,
�
So, WHY was it racist to report on the ethnicity of the Groomers? Were the victims of the groomers all color-blind? There must be a reason why the English authorities refused to expose all those White/Celtic/Saxon Groomers….
Raped by Afghan, Pregnant Woman Pleaded for Help But Three Pakistanis Passing by Raped Her Too
Breitbart, June 27, 2021
An Afghan migrant raped a 25-year-old pregnant woman in an Athens [Greece] neighbourhood, and when she begged for help from three Pakistanis passing by, they raped her, too.
Grooming Gangs Come from Diverse Backgrounds', Says Home Office
The Independent, December 16, 2020
Grooming gangs come from "diverse backgrounds", a Home Office review has concluded.
The research, originally promised by Sajid Javid in 2018, was published on Tuesday following a government U-turn.
The Home Office previously said releasing the paper would not be in the "public interest", in response to a Freedom of Information request by The Independent, but committed to making it public after a petition signed by more than 130,000 people.
The paper said that although a number of high-profile grooming cases, including Rotherham, Rochdale and Telford mainly involved men of Pakistani ethnicity, "links between ethnicity and this form of offending" could not be proven.
"Some studies suggest an over-representation of black and Asian offenders relative to the demographics of national populations. However, it is not possible to conclude that this is representative of all group-based CSE offending."
Child Sex Abuse Inquiry Refused to Probe Rotherham and Rochdale Grooming Gangs as It's Scared of Being Called Racist'
The Sun, October 24, 2020
A CHILD sex abuse inquiry reportedly refused to probe Rotherham and Rochdale grooming gangs as it is "scared of being called racist".
Sammy Woodhouse, a victim of a Rotherham gang, blasted the public inquiry has "not placed survivors at the forefront" of the probe.
â€They are trying to bury what happened in places like Rotherham and Rochdale because they're scared of being called racist."
And Sarah Champion, a campaigner for child victims, questioned the decision to not hear evidence on the northern grooming networks.
�
How does denying the issue of disproportionate black/brown violence/crime/low IQ/inherent resentment/dysfunctional proclivities help us?
How we address this issue is more important than pointing out it exists.
�
Lucky you. Have you seen what’s going on in El Salvador? The impossible, according to you, is happening therein. Bukele’s not even White; he looks Persian. He has European ancestry. Maybe he’s an Aryan of yore (Odysseus claims there was a swarthy Aryan sect). In any event, he’s not a Mestizo, but El Salvador is full of them.Replies: @muh muh
Hardly a Mestizo to be seen.
�
No one is worried over fewer Pakistanis in Pakistan.
Except for Pakistan, of course.
Safe to say most nations have an interest in keeping their citizenry at home, even if they don’t compel them to do so.
Do you observe similarities in Pakistani/Afghani cultural/national practices?
You’re still stuck in the notion that ‘Pakistani’ and ‘Afghani’ constitute distinct ethnic cohorts rather than nationalities. What you should be doing is examining the Pashtun ethnic cohort, since this cohort transcends the boundaries between northwest Pakistan and southern Afghanistan.
Based on my own research, bacha bazi is more prevalent among irreligious Pashtuns.
My position is there should be no Pakistani population in England/ America, and yes, many could be expelled, and those who remain could be forced to stop their predations, and the lack of respect for English culture/authority could be curtailed. It’s been done in the past; have we somehow lost all ability to defend ourselves?
Well, I agree about stronger enforcement of already existing laws. No problem.
But the last time Americans engaged in anything remotely resembling an ethnic cleansing campaign on its own soil was back in the 19th century, and not only were Native American populations not removed wholesale, they were also accorded tracts of territory regarded as autonomous nations to this day. What’s more, they’re also considered to be American citizens with all the rights conferred upon individuals living outside the confines of reservations.
Could you tell us when the last time Britain engaged in a similar kind of campaign on its own soil?
So, WHY was it racist to report on the ethnicity of the Groomers?
It shouldn’t be. Completely agreed.
2021 – The town of Rochdale’s population…its ethnic makeup was 57.2% White, 34.3% Asian.
That doesn’t track with the 2021 ONS stats online:
How does denying the issue of disproportionate black/brown violence/crime/low IQ/inherent resentment/dysfunctional proclivities help us?
You miss the point.
I have no problem reporting on the ethnicity of perps nor the disproportionate representation of any given ethnic group in crime stats. None whatsoever.
But there’s a big difference between acknowledging these reports and using them to justify an ethnic cleansing campaign, the latter of which you’re admittedly seeking to spearhead.
In order to do that, you’d first have to provide a stat showing how many British citizens/residents of Pakistani descent actually commit these crimes. We could zoom out even further and look at how many such people commit felony offenses in general.
If we aggregate these numbers and compare them to the general population of Pakistani Brits, I’d venture to say that we’re looking at less than 3% of that group. That’s not a ratio likely to persuade enough people to realize your objective.
Feel free to prove my estimate wrong, by the way. I’m entirely open to that possibility.
Have you seen what’s going on in El Salvador? The impossible, according to you, is happening therein.
Oh?
Please provide evidence that Bukele is engaged in a campaign of ethnic cleansing.
I'm not sure about that. Many poor Third World countries depend on the remittances of their overseas workers and immigrants, and encourage their citizens to go overseas.Replies: @muh muh
Safe to say most nations have an interest in keeping their citizenry at home, even if they don’t compel them to do so.
�
Yes, so they should all get themselves back posthaste. Pakistan needs Pakistanis; England/America does not.
Except for Pakistan, of course.
�
Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars
Safe to say most nations have an interest in keeping their citizenry at home, even if they don’t compel them to do so.
�
No, I think your “meandering†is indicative of my overall point - common behaviors can be discerned amongst people of a same/similar ethnic group (race/ethnicity sometimes overlaps, yes?), notwithstanding the behaviors generally common to all people. So, Germans and Swedes are similar in appearance/behaviors/intellect; so are Nigerians and Bantus, although Nigerians often assert that Bantus are amongst the worst of the Africans. Compared to Germans, Nigerians and Bantus are little different, in my opinion. Compared to England, Pakistan may as well be Africa.
You’re still stuck in the notion that ‘Pakistani’ and ‘Afghani’ constitute distinct ethnic cohorts rather than nationalities.
�
An ethnic cleansing campaign on its own soil? Or, internment based on race/ethnicity? A little of both…
Could you tell us when the last time Britain engaged in a similar kind of campaign on its own soil?
�
The Muslims/Moors weren’t innocent then; nor are they today. [Another swipe at Muslims, but is it really random? Are Muslims in Middle East/Asia, like modern Europeans, to be held to account for their history?]
When this Venetia returned home to the Emperor, the Emperor ordered him to build a ship; and several English-men, that were newly taken slaves, he caused to draw timber in a cart from Memora to Salley… like so many oxen, driving and whipping of them in a very barbarous manner.
The name of Venetia caused me to insert this here, to show the barbarous cruelty of this inhumane wretch…but I took my passage for England… at last delivered from under the hands of this inhumane tyrant and his hellish crew of Negroes; beseeching Almighty God, that all my country-men, in all their affairs and negotiations, may ever escape from his cruel hands. [Francis Brooks, 1693, […] Under The Tryanny of Mully Ishmael, Emperor of Morocco…in Barbary
�
The reason it was deemed racist to report on the identities of the groomers was because they were Pakistanis/Muslims/Not-White. That’s the general proof of the ethnicity/race of the offenders. Then there’s all those photographs…
It shouldn’t be. Completely agreed.
�
What you seem to be suggesting is that we sit around and do (mostly) nothing until their numbers (Pakistanis, Africans, et al) further swell and their crimes exponentially increase in severity and frequency, then we act, whilst we hope all the while that Magic Dirt Syndrome kicks in and they just eventually stop being who/what they inherently are, which is NOT European. (The issues they bring to European society is not just criminal, btw, but for the sake of brevity…) So, shall we use Pelican’s daughter/granddaughter-child as our guinea pig whilst we wait it out? Mary-Ann Leneghan and Kriss Donald say, for God’s sake, no. Pava LaPere says, I sacrificed my waste-of-a-life for retributive justice because I was stuffed with lies and false narratives about history and White Peoples.
If we aggregate these numbers and compare them to the general population of Pakistani
�
Define ethnic cleansing.
Please provide evidence that Bukele is engaged in a campaign of ethnic cleansing.
�
What’s annoying me here is that you’re pretending that he’s not pro all these other foreign people who aren’t Muslims.
It isn’t my intention to annoy you; we’ve haunted the same threads often enough for you to know my general position on all non-European migration into European nations; on the Whites who support/Love it!; and I have written herein – Tommy Robinson does not/did not go far enough in his advocacy for the English in England.
I watched the first video and about 2-3 minutes of the second. I don’t disagree with the sentiments of the speaker in #1; Talmud Tommy (#2) is apropos, however we do see Tommy insisting he’s not a racist – antisemitism is the pinnacle of Racism, so he’s toeing the line. When he starts bringing a copy of the Bell Curve to his interviews instead of the Koran, we’ll know he’s getting a clue.
I speculate that he is accurately describing his lived experience; the small number of Bangladeshis and Indians were not problematic, therefore he was stunned by the conduct of the newly arrived Pakistanis/Muslims/whomever. What Talmud Tommy fails to understand is that model minorities often unravel when minority groups, be it theirs or others, expand, and then Whites high-tail it out of Diversity Dodge, and voila! Western society devolves without Western people to sustain it. (Around here, we are accustomed to the shenanigans of the Mestizos; now we have even more Mexicans, Indians, and the blacks are arriving daily. They will all join forces against the White Devils, and I struggle to get “my people†to think about/plan for what’s coming)
I don’t pretend Tommy is not missing the big picture; I just wonder how it’s possible for someone like him to walk through today’s London, and despite being able to still do so, generally, without receiving a machete to the neck or acid to the face, he doesn’t concern himself over the ever-degrading conditions throughout and the dearth of White faces; it’s the same in Paris. We’re all in the same Camp of the Saints boat.
Jews stick together; so should we. Someone needs to save Tommy from himself. That’s all I’m sayin’.
He wants more Sikhs and less Muslims. He’s like a Sikh and Hindu advocate, along with being a Zionist.
Why he ignored the below “Grooming Gangs” due to them not being Muslims. His Zionist Handlers keep him away reporting on some cases if they do not fit the narrative.
Tommy Robinson misses another Grooming Gang, why??
Video Link
Sikh Groooming Gang in Middlesbrough.
Video Link
Grooming gang in Devon.
Video Link
More Groomers ignored by Tommy.
Well, thanks for the exposé of his book; I’ll likely cross it off my list. I haven’t read his books, but I’ve listened/watched many of his lectures/debates. It’s only recently that I’ve observed his love of all things Israel. Here’s the latest -I do think any criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic…if this wild lack of empathy for the state of Israel means anything, you’ve got to come back to this primordial triple standard, and we know it can come from anywhere; antisemitism is a shape-shifting virus…it can come from everywhere at the same time… people say, why are you so bothered about Israel? I hear that from the right…It seems to me… western civilization is based on the legacy of Athens and Jerusalem…[the destruction of Israel means] one of the underpinnings of western civilization, utterly, utterly at risk…[if all Jews were killed] it’s the end of the people who saw off everyone from pharaoh to Hitler… everyone else, in my view, wouldn’t survive either. Western civilization could not survive the destruction of the state of Israel, because it would be… the cutting away of the whole tree that we’re on; our civilization would die…It’s about America! Could America survive if the Jewish people were no more on its watch?I guess he thinks western civilization began in 1948?
As for Douglas Murray, I’ve read part of his book The War on the West
�
I understand your point, and I agree with you. Robinson does us no ultimate good regarding the Basilisk that is Israel, but consider what Murray said about the underpinnings of our civilization. The ausrotten of that notion must begin somewhere; perhaps it begins with the migrant “crisis†which was thrust upon us by the OpenBorder/WarsForIsrael People. I found my way to the answer to the JQ by first looking into the root(less) causes of Africans in America; civil rights mumbo-jumbo; immigration “reformâ€; obscured crime information; media collusion in censorship; who owns/runs the media, so on…they all lead to the same answer. So, people like Murray are a lost cause. I believe Robinson is lying to himself over his pro-browning of England stance because he doesn’t see the world from an ivory tower; I don’t think he really believes what he asserts in that regard. That doesn’t make him an ally, necessarily, but I’m saying that he and his ilk have the potential to be brought into the fold of those determined to get to the root of Murray’s Kosher Tree and yanking it out someday. Hopefully, someday soon.And, Robinson’s a White man stuck smack in the mire of the browning of the White West, and he has been outspoken on the matter of Muslim immigration in a manner that very few Whites have been willing to do; did he shill for Israel/Jews from the beginning? I don’t know and I don’t care, as too many Whites/Christians have been conditioned to believe Jews are our classic allies, as I once did, so it’s a mistake to write him/them off, wholly, in my opinion, as he/they can be reconditioned by the truth/reality. Robinson has White children; he and his progeny contain the well-spring of Western Civilization, and that’s the Reality.Therefore, I appreciate Robinson for what he has done, or tried to do, for White England. Did he do enough? I ask from the anonymous comfort of my gated community in America…Replies: @Phil Barker
If Tommy is a true believer, then it’s not any better in my opinion…And I don’t see why it would be better if Tommy was secretly anti-Jewish, but publicly he’s deliberately pro-Jewish, he goes to pro-Israel rallies, and he promotes Zionism.
�
Tommy Robinson is a multiculti liberal, who loves the browning of Britain as long as it’s Sikhs or Hindus doing the browning, and not Muslims. What’s annoying me here is that you’re pretending that he’s not pro all these other foreign people who aren’t Muslims. I’ve already demonstrated that. That’s what he is. He wants more Sikhs and less Muslims. He’s like a Sikh and Hindu advocate, along with being a Zionist.
This video isn’t great, but it’s adequate. The first part is someone talking about Tommy, and the second part is Tommy explaining his appreciation of Sikhs and Hindus who are anti-Islam. The perfect immigrants. And he has fantasies about building a multiethnic coalition against Muslims.
https://odysee.com/@Tony_Martin:2/tommy-robinson-supports-immigration-as:e
Here’s another one:
https://odysee.com/@AtheistRepublic:2/british-values-under-attack-tommy:2
Why he ignored the below "Grooming Gangs" due to them not being Muslims. His Zionist Handlers keep him away reporting on some cases if they do not fit the narrative. Tommy Robinson misses another Grooming Gang, why??
He wants more Sikhs and less Muslims. He’s like a Sikh and Hindu advocate, along with being a Zionist.
�
It isn’t my intention to annoy you; we’ve haunted the same threads often enough for you to know my general position on all non-European migration into European nations; on the Whites who support/Love it!; and I have written herein - Tommy Robinson does not/did not go far enough in his advocacy for the English in England.I watched the first video and about 2-3 minutes of the second. I don’t disagree with the sentiments of the speaker in #1; Talmud Tommy (#2) is apropos, however we do see Tommy insisting he’s not a racist - antisemitism is the pinnacle of Racism, so he’s toeing the line. When he starts bringing a copy of the Bell Curve to his interviews instead of the Koran, we’ll know he’s getting a clue.I speculate that he is accurately describing his lived experience; the small number of Bangladeshis and Indians were not problematic, therefore he was stunned by the conduct of the newly arrived Pakistanis/Muslims/whomever. What Talmud Tommy fails to understand is that model minorities often unravel when minority groups, be it theirs or others, expand, and then Whites high-tail it out of Diversity Dodge, and voila! Western society devolves without Western people to sustain it. (Around here, we are accustomed to the shenanigans of the Mestizos; now we have even more Mexicans, Indians, and the blacks are arriving daily. They will all join forces against the White Devils, and I struggle to get “my people†to think about/plan for what’s coming)I don’t pretend Tommy is not missing the big picture; I just wonder how it’s possible for someone like him to walk through today’s London, and despite being able to still do so, generally, without receiving a machete to the neck or acid to the face, he doesn’t concern himself over the ever-degrading conditions throughout and the dearth of White faces; it’s the same in Paris. We’re all in the same Camp of the Saints boat.Jews stick together; so should we. Someone needs to save Tommy from himself. That’s all I’m sayin’.
What’s annoying me here is that you’re pretending that he’s not pro all these other foreign people who aren’t Muslims.
�
You mentioned northwestern Pakistan specifically, which is comprised of the same ethnic group (Pashtun) as resides in southern Afghanistan. Your concern is with ethnicity, right?If ethnicity is your concern, how is this 'meandering'?Look, dude... This is, quite frankly, getting tiresome, so I'll focus on your comment that seems to cut to the heart of the matter, since I don't think readers here have a whole lot of patience for either of us right now -- if, that is, they're even paying attention anymore:
You meandered from rape-y Pakistanis to rape-y Afghans.
�
No, not at all.The statistic I have yet to see is the percentage of Pakistani immigrants (naturalized or otherwise) who are part of these grooming gangs. I'd venture to say it's still a small minority relative to their general population, though I would like to confirm this.Now I don't deny this ethnic cohort may be over-represented relative to their general numbers, but even if this is so, the notion that trumpeting these stats far and wide will ever result in the wholesale removal of the Pakistani population from Britain or any other European country is a pie-in-the-sky fantasy. Furthermore, even if you proscribed their immigration tomorrow, that's not going to solve the problem.The more practical solution, as such, is to actually apply the law without fear that police are running afoul of some politically correct code of conduct. In fact, the penalty for this kind of crime should be made far more severe, as it is in most Muslim dominant countries. That, too, may be wishful thinking, but it's a more easily attainable goal than some kind of ethnic cleansing campaign.Poster Colin Wright has called for a moratorium on *all* immigration, which, in my opinion, is also unrealistic, but I'm still in favor of establishing more restrictive quotas.In summary, I'm looking for results, not just statistics. The fact that sexually explicit material is 'consumed' far more in America than in any other nation on earth doesn't interest me as much as its damaging social effects, including, but not limited to, the deterioration of family life and plummeting birth rates. How we address this issue is more important than pointing out it exists.FWIW, I'm a white American, born and raised, and the minority population where I live (well north of Texas) is, in fact, quite small. Hardly a Mestizo to be seen.Replies: @muh muh, @Tiptoethrutulips
[Y]ou deny reality, statistics, and human biodiversity.
�
If ethnicity is your concern, how is this ‘meandering’?
Ethnicity, as it relates to culture/politics/social norms, is/should be of utmost concern, especially in nations currently subjected to deliberate demographic replacement, which can be narrowed down to ONLY western/White nations. No one is worried over fewer Pakistanis in Pakistan.
Do you observe similarities in Pakistani/Afghani cultural/national practices? Based on what? Islam or ethnic proclivities/sensibilities? Do you discern group behaviors when convenient, then?
This is, quite frankly, getting tiresome
Agreed. How about tedious? You accused me of trolling, which implies arguing for the pure sake of arguing, with no honest intentions or purpose, so here’s one final troll – tedious.
Now I don’t deny this ethnic cohort may be over-represented relative to their general numbers,
My position is there should be no Pakistani population in England/ America, and yes, many could be expelled, and those who remain could be forced to stop their predations, and the lack of respect for English culture/authority could be curtailed. It’s been done in the past; have we somehow lost all ability to defend ourselves?
On those cohorts, about whom White Haters incessantly lie, lie, lie –
Raped by Afghan, Pregnant Woman Pleaded for Help But Three Pakistanis Passing by Raped Her Too
Breitbart, June 27, 2021
An Afghan migrant raped a 25-year-old pregnant woman in an Athens [Greece] neighbourhood, and when she begged for help from three Pakistanis passing by, they raped her, too.Grooming Gangs Come from Diverse Backgrounds‘, Says Home Office
The Independent, December 16, 2020
Grooming gangs come from “diverse backgrounds”, a Home Office review has concluded.
The research, originally promised by Sajid Javid in 2018, was published on Tuesday following a government U-turn.
The Home Office previously said releasing the paper would not be in the “public interest”, in response to a Freedom of Information request by The Independent, but committed to making it public after a petition signed by more than 130,000 people.The paper said that although a number of high-profile grooming cases, including Rotherham, Rochdale and Telford mainly involved men of Pakistani ethnicity, “links between ethnicity and this form of offending” could not be proven.
“Some studies suggest an over-representation of black and Asian offenders relative to the demographics of national populations. However, it is not possible to conclude that this is representative of all group-based CSE offending.”
Child Sex Abuse Inquiry Refused to Probe Rotherham and Rochdale Grooming Gangs as It’s Scared of Being Called Racist’
The Sun, October 24, 2020
A CHILD sex abuse inquiry reportedly refused to probe Rotherham and Rochdale grooming gangs as it is “scared of being called racist”.Sammy Woodhouse, a victim of a Rotherham gang, blasted the public inquiry has “not placed survivors at the forefront” of the probe.
â€They are trying to bury what happened in places like Rotherham and Rochdale because they’re scared of being called racist.”
And Sarah Champion, a campaigner for child victims, questioned the decision to not hear evidence on the northern grooming networks.
So, WHY was it racist to report on the ethnicity of the Groomers? Were the victims of the groomers all color-blind? There must be a reason why the English authorities refused to expose all those White/Celtic/Saxon Groomers….
Homework:
2021 – The town of Rochdale’s population…its ethnic makeup was 57.2% White, 34.3% Asian.
2011 – White 65.2% Asian 27.5%
2001 – White 78.7% 19.9% Asian
How we address this issue is more important than pointing out it exists.
How does denying the issue of disproportionate black/brown violence/crime/low IQ/inherent resentment/dysfunctional proclivities help us?
Hardly a Mestizo to be seen.
Lucky you. Have you seen what’s going on in El Salvador? The impossible, according to you, is happening therein. Bukele’s not even White; he looks Persian. He has European ancestry. Maybe he’s an Aryan of yore (Odysseus claims there was a swarthy Aryan sect). In any event, he’s not a Mestizo, but El Salvador is full of them.
Except for Pakistan, of course.Safe to say most nations have an interest in keeping their citizenry at home, even if they don't compel them to do so.
No one is worried over fewer Pakistanis in Pakistan.
�
You're still stuck in the notion that 'Pakistani' and 'Afghani' constitute distinct ethnic cohorts rather than nationalities. What you should be doing is examining the Pashtun ethnic cohort, since this cohort transcends the boundaries between northwest Pakistan and southern Afghanistan.Based on my own research, bacha bazi is more prevalent among irreligious Pashtuns.
Do you observe similarities in Pakistani/Afghani cultural/national practices?
�
Well, I agree about stronger enforcement of already existing laws. No problem.But the last time Americans engaged in anything remotely resembling an ethnic cleansing campaign on its own soil was back in the 19th century, and not only were Native American populations not removed wholesale, they were also accorded tracts of territory regarded as autonomous nations to this day. What's more, they're also considered to be American citizens with all the rights conferred upon individuals living outside the confines of reservations.Could you tell us when the last time Britain engaged in a similar kind of campaign on its own soil?
My position is there should be no Pakistani population in England/ America, and yes, many could be expelled, and those who remain could be forced to stop their predations, and the lack of respect for English culture/authority could be curtailed. It’s been done in the past; have we somehow lost all ability to defend ourselves?
�
It shouldn't be. Completely agreed.
So, WHY was it racist to report on the ethnicity of the Groomers?
�
That doesn't track with the 2021 ONS stats online:https://i.imghippo.com/files/AhzQ1451VTs.png
2021 – The town of Rochdale’s population…its ethnic makeup was 57.2% White, 34.3% Asian.
�
You miss the point.I have no problem reporting on the ethnicity of perps nor the disproportionate representation of any given ethnic group in crime stats. None whatsoever.But there's a big difference between acknowledging these reports and using them to justify an ethnic cleansing campaign, the latter of which you're admittedly seeking to spearhead.In order to do that, you'd first have to provide a stat showing how many British citizens/residents of Pakistani descent actually commit these crimes. We could zoom out even further and look at how many such people commit felony offenses in general. If we aggregate these numbers and compare them to the general population of Pakistani Brits, I'd venture to say that we're looking at less than 3% of that group. That's not a ratio likely to persuade enough people to realize your objective. Feel free to prove my estimate wrong, by the way. I'm entirely open to that possibility.
How does denying the issue of disproportionate black/brown violence/crime/low IQ/inherent resentment/dysfunctional proclivities help us?
�
Oh?Please provide evidence that Bukele is engaged in a campaign of ethnic cleansing.Replies: @Commentator Mike, @Tiptoethrutulips
Have you seen what’s going on in El Salvador? The impossible, according to you, is happening therein.
�
Here’s your link; only one of many that can be found if you would only look:
Post links with your claims or don’t bother posting!
Is there a specific claim I made about Robinson that is under dispute?
who took the time to painstakingly read through all the court documents and explain them in easy to understand terms.
I understand that Robinson is currently in jail for a contempt of court charge; that’s all I know to date. Perhaps he has contempt for English authority/court. He would be foolish to do anything other than publicly deny he was aware/duly noticed of a proceeding; in fact, he shouldn’t be speaking on it publicly, at all. Maybe a little Taqiyya is in order for a few English lads these days…what’s good for the Jihadis is good for the Golden Geese.
Is Sharia compatible with western jurisprudence? Millions of Muslims say, sure it is. They also say they will breed the English out of England.
So, did you painstakingly read through all the subject court documents or are you relying on the proficiency of random X guy?
What a horrible state of affairs. He also has a great passage about his personal hero:
Equal if not greater ignorance can be found in America. A poll carried out in 2020 found that almost two-thirds of Americans between the ages of eighteen and thirty-nine had no idea that 6 million Jews were killed in the Holocaust. According to the study, almost half of Americans in their twenties and thirties could not name a single concentration camp or ghetto established by the Nazis during World War II. About one in eight young Americans (12 percent) said that they had not heard of the Holocaust or didn’t think that they had heard of it.
�
He thinks it's way out of line to refer to such a great man as "a drunk".
Churchill had been right on many things in his long career, as he had been wrong on some, but identifying the menace of Hitler early on in the 1930s and urging rearmament and facing down the appeasers made him—even before his conduct of the war—one of the great figures of any period in history. Many people talk of fascism and antifascism, but here, without doubt, was the twentieth century’s greatest antifascist. If anything, his reputation only grew in the decades after his death. In 2002, he beat off all competition to be voted by the British public as “The Greatest Briton†of all time.
�
So he has no solutions, just more MLK, and his book is just complaining about leftists and their hypocrisy.Replies: @Tiptoethrutulips
the only way to transcend the divisions is to forge “a civic culture that respects both differences and commonalities.†And the only way this can be done “is through education that seeks to comprehend the diversity of human culture.†And to recognize that “any human being sufficiently curious and motivated can fully possess another culture, no matter how ‘alien’ it may appear to be.â€
�
As for Douglas Murray, I’ve read part of his book The War on the West
Well, thanks for the exposé of his book; I’ll likely cross it off my list. I haven’t read his books, but I’ve listened/watched many of his lectures/debates. It’s only recently that I’ve observed his love of all things Israel. Here’s the latest –
I do think any criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic…if this wild lack of empathy for the state of Israel means anything, you’ve got to come back to this primordial triple standard, and we know it can come from anywhere; antisemitism is a shape-shifting virus…it can come from everywhere at the same time… people say, why are you so bothered about Israel? I hear that from the right…It seems to me… western civilization is based on the legacy of Athens and Jerusalem…[the destruction of Israel means] one of the underpinnings of western civilization, utterly, utterly at risk…[if all Jews were killed] it’s the end of the people who saw off everyone from pharaoh to Hitler… everyone else, in my view, wouldn’t survive either. Western civilization could not survive the destruction of the state of Israel, because it would be… the cutting away of the whole tree that we’re on; our civilization would die…It’s about America! Could America survive if the Jewish people were no more on its watch?
I guess he thinks western civilization began in 1948?
If Tommy is a true believer, then it’s not any better in my opinion…And I don’t see why it would be better if Tommy was secretly anti-Jewish, but publicly he’s deliberately pro-Jewish, he goes to pro-Israel rallies, and he promotes Zionism.
I understand your point, and I agree with you. Robinson does us no ultimate good regarding the Basilisk that is Israel, but consider what Murray said about the underpinnings of our civilization. The ausrotten of that notion must begin somewhere; perhaps it begins with the migrant “crisis†which was thrust upon us by the OpenBorder/WarsForIsrael People. I found my way to the answer to the JQ by first looking into the root(less) causes of Africans in America; civil rights mumbo-jumbo; immigration “reformâ€; obscured crime information; media collusion in censorship; who owns/runs the media, so on…they all lead to the same answer.
So, people like Murray are a lost cause. I believe Robinson is lying to himself over his pro-browning of England stance because he doesn’t see the world from an ivory tower; I don’t think he really believes what he asserts in that regard. That doesn’t make him an ally, necessarily, but I’m saying that he and his ilk have the potential to be brought into the fold of those determined to get to the root of Murray’s Kosher Tree and yanking it out someday. Hopefully, someday soon.
And, Robinson’s a White man stuck smack in the mire of the browning of the White West, and he has been outspoken on the matter of Muslim immigration in a manner that very few Whites have been willing to do; did he shill for Israel/Jews from the beginning? I don’t know and I don’t care, as too many Whites/Christians have been conditioned to believe Jews are our classic allies, as I once did, so it’s a mistake to write him/them off, wholly, in my opinion, as he/they can be reconditioned by the truth/reality. Robinson has White children; he and his progeny contain the well-spring of Western Civilization, and that’s the Reality.
Therefore, I appreciate Robinson for what he has done, or tried to do, for White England. Did he do enough? I ask from the anonymous comfort of my gated community in America…
Sure, and they're probably more disproportionately represented in that group than grooming gang members are in the general population of Pakistani immigrants and their progeny.But it's a waste of time and energy to pursue this angle, since you're only going to elicit angry responses that point to the greater severity of crimes committed by grooming gangs as well as the allegation that gang members aren't arrested due to political correctness.And round and round and round it goes... the maddening calliope of Zionist instigation, leaving us all dizzied, dissatisfied, and distempered, just as our enemies prefer.Aside from having us literally kill each other, could they ask for a better outcome?Replies: @Anonymous 1
The EDL have paedophiles in their ranks but Tommy Robinson evidently doesn’t condemn them!
�
Allegation that gang members aren’t arrested due to political correctness.
The above is one of the biggest lies we have been fed in relation to why the abuse was and is still swept under the carpet. It plays well into the dividing of communities in the England and sadly fall for it including the TommyTards.
No political figures wether at local or goverment level will own up and admit that they made mistakes. They see themselves as being unaccountable.
Ex Met Detective John Wedger
The Child Abuse Cover Up – A Police Whistleblower Speaks.
In a courageous and explosive audio interview with UK Column “Despatches from the Front”, Detective Constable John Wedger, a Metropolitan Police child protection specialist, takes the lid off the scale of child abuse, trafficking and prostitution in London and UK. He exposes the lies, threats and intimidation used by the police, Local Authorities, Social Services, Politicians, Charities and others to protect Establishment figures and Westminster.
This criminal conspiracy seeks to deceive the public and stop the truth emerging in every possible way.
Young children taken from care, stolen, picked up on the street, groomed for sex, drugged, sickened with serious disease, or dying in the gutter are shown to be the worthless play things of powerful people – the same people who run Britain, and the very authorities supposedly protecting families, society and the weak and vulnerable.
John Wedger’s courage deserves that everyone listening to his testimony circulates it and demands action.
A Britain run by those who protect child abusers and murders is shown to be the sickening reality, but a far danger future lurks beneath the surface as this criminal British State, unchecked, grabs yet more power over families and children by the day…
https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-child-abuse-cover-up-a-police-whistleblower-speaks--9063689
Panorama and the BBC Cover-up of Child Abuse.
Despite multiple victims, corroberating evidence and statements, and a brave Asian tutor who first exposed the abuse of white children by white men, the whole matter was covered up by OCVC staff, Oxford City and County Councils, Oxfordshire Safeguarding, Ofsted, Thames Valley Police and others…
https://www.ukcolumn.org/blogs/panorama-and-bbc-cover-child-abuse
Interesting. Now do Jews.Replies: @Carney
They’re neither English nor Celtic. They do not belong in Great Britain or Ireland.
�
There’s absolute principle, but there are also degrees of obnoxiousness and urgency, and thus priority. In order from least to most:
Anglo-Celts – other Germanic or Celtic Europeans – other northwestern Europeans – other non-Jewish whites – assimilated longtime Jews – Hasidic / foreign / recent Jews – non Chinese Orientals – Chinese – Christian “browns” (mestizo, Filipino, Indonesian, etc) – Hindus Sikhs pagans and other non-Abrahamic browns – Muslim browns / Christian blacks (hard to choose which is worse) – pagan blacks – Muslim blacks.
At the very at least, with Israel existing now, it doesn’t sense to allow any further immigration of them, especially on a large scale – the old “but they have nowhere else to go” is not true anymore.
Of course. But your prohibited from pointing that out.
Can’t we say exactly this about most of our “defenders,†i.e., Douglas Murray?
I really couldn’t tell you why he loves Jews so much, but for whatever reason he does
�
That’s both interesting and unfortunate information on Robinson. It has been a few years since I followed his travails, but I remember being impressed with him after watching an interview on a show with that sanctimonious twit, Piers Morgan; he held his own with Piers and with a few others, as well. Qualifications about “my colored friends†don’t usually register with me, because “they†all say it, often (in my opinion) because they feel it must be said in order to prevent accusations of racism and bigotry.
I would say he does not care much about “White†Britain, and I’ll explain why….
�
They’re both basically antiracist liberals. I don’t care about this distinction between being a “Jewish operative” or just being “brainwashed” because both Douglas Murray and Tommy Robinson are being paid by Zionist orgs anyway. If Tommy is a true believer, then it’s not any better in my opinion, as opposed to being a cynical paid shill. And I don’t see why it would be better if Tommy was secretly anti-Jewish, but publicly he’s deliberately pro-Jewish, he goes to pro-Israel rallies, and he promotes Zionism. Why would it be better if he was secretly anti-Jewish in those circumstances? It would actually be worse in my opinion, because that means he’s totally full of shit.
As for Douglas Murray, I’ve read part of his book The War on the West, published three years ago. It’s really just a bunch of conservative ideas.
I’m skimming through it now. Murray complains about a lot of things in that book. He complains about “Critical Race Theory” because it’s too racist. He complains about “identity politics” because group identities shouldn’t matter, and we’re just supposed to be individuals floating in space. His critique of “the Left” is that they’re too racist and we’re not supposed to be racist, plus white people aren’t really racist so just please stop calling us racist.
He also complains about China and how they’re “genociding” the Uighurs and doing all these other terrible things to people. He thinks we should really care a lot about that. He’s like “it’s the 1940s all over again.” He says China are the real racists, and people should really fear them because totalitarianism. He also complains that not enough people in the West have favorable attitudes towards capitalism.
Here’s one of his more serious complaints about the decline of the West:
Equal if not greater ignorance can be found in America. A poll carried out in 2020 found that almost two-thirds of Americans between the ages of eighteen and thirty-nine had no idea that 6 million Jews were killed in the Holocaust. According to the study, almost half of Americans in their twenties and thirties could not name a single concentration camp or ghetto established by the Nazis during World War II. About one in eight young Americans (12 percent) said that they had not heard of the Holocaust or didn’t think that they had heard of it.
What a horrible state of affairs. He also has a great passage about his personal hero:
Churchill had been right on many things in his long career, as he had been wrong on some, but identifying the menace of Hitler early on in the 1930s and urging rearmament and facing down the appeasers made him—even before his conduct of the war—one of the great figures of any period in history. Many people talk of fascism and antifascism, but here, without doubt, was the twentieth century’s greatest antifascist. If anything, his reputation only grew in the decades after his death. In 2002, he beat off all competition to be voted by the British public as “The Greatest Briton†of all time.
He thinks it’s way out of line to refer to such a great man as “a drunk”.
Anyway, he goes on to try and rehabilitate Winston Churchill and he complains about how terrible it is that people compare the pristine British Empire to the despicable Nazi regime. He says more context and nuance is necessary.
A good portion of the book is spent “defending” historical figures. But since he agrees that racism and bigotry are the worst things ever, his defense amounts to “they really weren’t that racist, all things considered.” And this is supposed to make white people feel good, because if these men from the 18th and 19th century really were as terrible as “the Leftists” claim, if they really were Nazis, then we rightfully should feel shameful.
Finally, at the end, he gives us the answer to our problems:
the only way to transcend the divisions is to forge “a civic culture that respects both differences and commonalities.†And the only way this can be done “is through education that seeks to comprehend the diversity of human culture.†And to recognize that “any human being sufficiently curious and motivated can fully possess another culture, no matter how ‘alien’ it may appear to be.â€
So he has no solutions, just more MLK, and his book is just complaining about leftists and their hypocrisy.
Well, thanks for the exposé of his book; I’ll likely cross it off my list. I haven’t read his books, but I’ve listened/watched many of his lectures/debates. It’s only recently that I’ve observed his love of all things Israel. Here’s the latest -I do think any criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic…if this wild lack of empathy for the state of Israel means anything, you’ve got to come back to this primordial triple standard, and we know it can come from anywhere; antisemitism is a shape-shifting virus…it can come from everywhere at the same time… people say, why are you so bothered about Israel? I hear that from the right…It seems to me… western civilization is based on the legacy of Athens and Jerusalem…[the destruction of Israel means] one of the underpinnings of western civilization, utterly, utterly at risk…[if all Jews were killed] it’s the end of the people who saw off everyone from pharaoh to Hitler… everyone else, in my view, wouldn’t survive either. Western civilization could not survive the destruction of the state of Israel, because it would be… the cutting away of the whole tree that we’re on; our civilization would die…It’s about America! Could America survive if the Jewish people were no more on its watch?I guess he thinks western civilization began in 1948?
As for Douglas Murray, I’ve read part of his book The War on the West
�
I understand your point, and I agree with you. Robinson does us no ultimate good regarding the Basilisk that is Israel, but consider what Murray said about the underpinnings of our civilization. The ausrotten of that notion must begin somewhere; perhaps it begins with the migrant “crisis†which was thrust upon us by the OpenBorder/WarsForIsrael People. I found my way to the answer to the JQ by first looking into the root(less) causes of Africans in America; civil rights mumbo-jumbo; immigration “reformâ€; obscured crime information; media collusion in censorship; who owns/runs the media, so on…they all lead to the same answer. So, people like Murray are a lost cause. I believe Robinson is lying to himself over his pro-browning of England stance because he doesn’t see the world from an ivory tower; I don’t think he really believes what he asserts in that regard. That doesn’t make him an ally, necessarily, but I’m saying that he and his ilk have the potential to be brought into the fold of those determined to get to the root of Murray’s Kosher Tree and yanking it out someday. Hopefully, someday soon.And, Robinson’s a White man stuck smack in the mire of the browning of the White West, and he has been outspoken on the matter of Muslim immigration in a manner that very few Whites have been willing to do; did he shill for Israel/Jews from the beginning? I don’t know and I don’t care, as too many Whites/Christians have been conditioned to believe Jews are our classic allies, as I once did, so it’s a mistake to write him/them off, wholly, in my opinion, as he/they can be reconditioned by the truth/reality. Robinson has White children; he and his progeny contain the well-spring of Western Civilization, and that’s the Reality.Therefore, I appreciate Robinson for what he has done, or tried to do, for White England. Did he do enough? I ask from the anonymous comfort of my gated community in America…Replies: @Phil Barker
If Tommy is a true believer, then it’s not any better in my opinion…And I don’t see why it would be better if Tommy was secretly anti-Jewish, but publicly he’s deliberately pro-Jewish, he goes to pro-Israel rallies, and he promotes Zionism.
�
They’re neither English nor Celtic. They do not belong in Great Britain or Ireland.
Interesting. Now do Jews.
Actually the ones who understand Indian Civilisation the least are the Indians. This is because they are given to whimsical thinking. They confuse what they wish to be so, with what is so.--------------------------------You must know that I do not bother to read more than a few of your sentences, so if you wish to impress me, you have to make your point succintly, rather than indulge in the CHARACTERISTICALLY INDIAN PENCHANT for extremely LENGTHY AND VERBOSE rants.Simply put, you Indians TALK WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY TOO MUCH.Do more, and talk less. That way maybe you won't be so butthurt/jealous about the Chinese.Replies: @showmethereal, @Xavier
the Chinese seem to be the one who understand Indian Civilization the least
�
Yeah that guy Malla is a weirdo. He literally skips over dozens of comments by WHITES stating that Indians are just good at kissing up to them (hoping to back stab them) – but he seeks out to combat Chinese (ethnic or otherwise). Real weirdo.
The EDL have paedophiles in their ranks but Tommy Robinson evidently doesn’t condemn them!
Sure, and they’re probably more disproportionately represented in that group than grooming gang members are in the general population of Pakistani immigrants and their progeny.
But it’s a waste of time and energy to pursue this angle, since you’re only going to elicit angry responses that point to the greater severity of crimes committed by grooming gangs as well as the allegation that gang members aren’t arrested due to political correctness.
And round and round and round it goes… the maddening calliope of Zionist instigation, leaving us all dizzied, dissatisfied, and distempered, just as our enemies prefer.
Aside from having us literally kill each other, could they ask for a better outcome?
The above is one of the biggest lies we have been fed in relation to why the abuse was and is still swept under the carpet. It plays well into the dividing of communities in the England and sadly fall for it including the TommyTards.
Allegation that gang members aren’t arrested due to political correctness.
�
You mentioned northwestern Pakistan specifically, which is comprised of the same ethnic group (Pashtun) as resides in southern Afghanistan. Your concern is with ethnicity, right?If ethnicity is your concern, how is this 'meandering'?Look, dude... This is, quite frankly, getting tiresome, so I'll focus on your comment that seems to cut to the heart of the matter, since I don't think readers here have a whole lot of patience for either of us right now -- if, that is, they're even paying attention anymore:
You meandered from rape-y Pakistanis to rape-y Afghans.
�
No, not at all.The statistic I have yet to see is the percentage of Pakistani immigrants (naturalized or otherwise) who are part of these grooming gangs. I'd venture to say it's still a small minority relative to their general population, though I would like to confirm this.Now I don't deny this ethnic cohort may be over-represented relative to their general numbers, but even if this is so, the notion that trumpeting these stats far and wide will ever result in the wholesale removal of the Pakistani population from Britain or any other European country is a pie-in-the-sky fantasy. Furthermore, even if you proscribed their immigration tomorrow, that's not going to solve the problem.The more practical solution, as such, is to actually apply the law without fear that police are running afoul of some politically correct code of conduct. In fact, the penalty for this kind of crime should be made far more severe, as it is in most Muslim dominant countries. That, too, may be wishful thinking, but it's a more easily attainable goal than some kind of ethnic cleansing campaign.Poster Colin Wright has called for a moratorium on *all* immigration, which, in my opinion, is also unrealistic, but I'm still in favor of establishing more restrictive quotas.In summary, I'm looking for results, not just statistics. The fact that sexually explicit material is 'consumed' far more in America than in any other nation on earth doesn't interest me as much as its damaging social effects, including, but not limited to, the deterioration of family life and plummeting birth rates. How we address this issue is more important than pointing out it exists.FWIW, I'm a white American, born and raised, and the minority population where I live (well north of Texas) is, in fact, quite small. Hardly a Mestizo to be seen.Replies: @muh muh, @Tiptoethrutulips
[Y]ou deny reality, statistics, and human biodiversity.
�
this ethnic cohort
To be accurate, ‘Pakistani’ isn’t an actual ethnicity.
In Britain, we’d be talking about immigrants originating from Pakistan or their descendants.
Ahem! Last I heard Xinjiang remains a restricted zone for independent travelers .... but Commie Chink Bastard tours are approved. AKA as a foreigner you can't travel freely.In other news Foreigners just can't see visiting, or staying, in Commieland. LOL!!!!!The vise free entry policy just REEKS of desperation for tourist and business dollars.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34G85lLnXz4The island of Hainan is empty and just waiting to scam foreigners after scamming Chinks!In still other news... a new disease in running rampant in China with many hospitals packed. Makes you wonder about why the Commie Chink Bastards want all these foreigners visiting. Perhaps in a month or so the origin of the disease will be "discovered" to be "foreigners". LOL!!!!Replies: @mulga mumblebrain, @showmethereal
Cool! But yeah China isn’t playing around. But I think it’s cool to see so many westerners go to Xinjiang and see for themselves and not the lies their own western governments tell them.
�
Are you the producer of these stupid fake videos??? You realize people can go themselves and see that you are a liar (or an idiot)?
A brutal empire at that… One who was toe to toe with the feared Mongols for a long time. But yeah their view is based on the “cold war” where they had to rehabilitate Tibet to use as a prick against China. So that supposedly reformed Nazi wrote a story Seven Years in Tibet and they made a Hollywood movie as a psyop.
Very true.
a Hollywood movie as a psyop.
�
Yes but there is a big difference between being wise and intelligent. You can be wise without being very intelligent – and vice versa. Those protestors holding up US flags and signs in English show all of what they are about (like in the HK protests)… Doesn’t mean they lack intelligence though. They lack wisdom — and probably some moral conviction as well.
I think that the Chinese government has take the right policy towards the Uighurs...that to raise their standard of living and affluence.I relate that Singapore has had similar situation with our Malay-Muslim community. As you know Singapore is a Chinese majority country surrounded by far larger Muslim countries that are of the same ethnic stock as the Malays.In the past there were always concerns about the loyalty of the Singaporean Malays to Singapore. In the early days, there were segments that saw themselves more aligned to Malaysia than to Singapore. There were of course national security implications so that Malays had to be vetted extremely carefully before given sensitive military positions. The Malaysians used to laugh that Malays in Singapore never became air force pilots, naval captains, or army generals.But over the decades as Singapore's standard of living has improved, far exceeding that of Malaysia and Indonesia, I have noticed a phenomenon....that the folks that are proudest of being Singaporean are actually the Malays. If I see a Singapore flag sticker on a car, or a Singapore flag patch sewn onto a backpack or baseball cap, I know that the owner is probably a Singaporean Malay, who does not want to be mistaken for a Malaysian or Indonesian. If it works out the same way in China, as China continues its rise and the Uighurs find that they have actually become better off then their other Turkic kin, they will become much more eager to be identified as Chinese. The secessionist problem will then disappear.So I see the Chinese government policy towards Xinjiang as very wise.Replies: @antibeast, @showmethereal
Xinjiang
�
Oh that is very interesting about the Malay people in Singapore now. I recall years back the talk used to be how to get them to do better in the schools in Singapore. That’s interesting to see how things changed.
But really the separatist Uighurs are/were the militants. All the neighboring “stan” countries know Xinjiang has a higher standard of living than their own countries. That’s partly why they are all in the Shanghai Cooperation Org… It was a security grouping – but the rationality that would lead to economic development. Except for the Baloch extremist militants in Pakistan – most everyone else is participating one way or another.
The whole Musk-Robinson brouhaha is inseparable from the Zionist war against both Muslims and the west.
They’ve been agitating for this sort of conflict for years.
Written in 1993:
Mossad script sets U.S. against Islam
https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1993/eirv20n28-19930723/eirv20n28-19930723_058-mossad_script_sets_us_against_is.pdf
I didn’t cry, straw man! You meandered from rape-y Pakistanis to rape-y Afghans. I understood perfectly well your point. You wrote, “Would that the Taliban prevailed in Pakistan:…†Did you thereby acknowledge that rape/abuse of children is rampant in Pakistan? So, Pakistanis arrive to the UK and poof! No more rape-y proclivities?
The ethnic group concerned is identical. Which, contrary to your claim, is not a straw man argument. Not by a long shot.
�
The lesser of two evils? How about we tolerate neither in European society?
‘twould be better.
�
Were you born in America, and what is your ethnicity?
I live in the American sticks, overwhelmingly white
�
Is that an ad hominem attack? I had to look for a definition of piker. I don’t think it’s applicable to me.
you’re a piker
�
Are you suggesting I should be more humble? That’s good advice, Pelican. I’ll work on it.Replies: @muh muh
But go with your bad self, tiptoe. I know you can’t help it. 🕶ï¸
�
You meandered from rape-y Pakistanis to rape-y Afghans.
You mentioned northwestern Pakistan specifically, which is comprised of the same ethnic group (Pashtun) as resides in southern Afghanistan. Your concern is with ethnicity, right?
If ethnicity is your concern, how is this ‘meandering’?
Look, dude… This is, quite frankly, getting tiresome, so I’ll focus on your comment that seems to cut to the heart of the matter, since I don’t think readers here have a whole lot of patience for either of us right now — if, that is, they’re even paying attention anymore:
[Y]ou deny reality, statistics, and human biodiversity.
No, not at all.
The statistic I have yet to see is the percentage of Pakistani immigrants (naturalized or otherwise) who are part of these grooming gangs. I’d venture to say it’s still a small minority relative to their general population, though I would like to confirm this.
Now I don’t deny this ethnic cohort may be over-represented relative to their general numbers, but even if this is so, the notion that trumpeting these stats far and wide will ever result in the wholesale removal of the Pakistani population from Britain or any other European country is a pie-in-the-sky fantasy. Furthermore, even if you proscribed their immigration tomorrow, that’s not going to solve the problem.
The more practical solution, as such, is to actually apply the law without fear that police are running afoul of some politically correct code of conduct. In fact, the penalty for this kind of crime should be made far more severe, as it is in most Muslim dominant countries. That, too, may be wishful thinking, but it’s a more easily attainable goal than some kind of ethnic cleansing campaign.
Poster Colin Wright has called for a moratorium on *all* immigration, which, in my opinion, is also unrealistic, but I’m still in favor of establishing more restrictive quotas.
In summary, I’m looking for results, not just statistics. The fact that sexually explicit material is ‘consumed’ far more in America than in any other nation on earth doesn’t interest me as much as its damaging social effects, including, but not limited to, the deterioration of family life and plummeting birth rates. How we address this issue is more important than pointing out it exists.
FWIW, I’m a white American, born and raised, and the minority population where I live (well north of Texas) is, in fact, quite small. Hardly a Mestizo to be seen.
To be accurate, 'Pakistani' isn't an actual ethnicity.
this ethnic cohort
�
Ethnicity, as it relates to culture/politics/social norms, is/should be of utmost concern, especially in nations currently subjected to deliberate demographic replacement, which can be narrowed down to ONLY western/White nations. No one is worried over fewer Pakistanis in Pakistan.
If ethnicity is your concern, how is this ‘meandering’?
�
Agreed. How about tedious? You accused me of trolling, which implies arguing for the pure sake of arguing, with no honest intentions or purpose, so here’s one final troll - tedious.
This is, quite frankly, getting tiresome
�
My position is there should be no Pakistani population in England/ America, and yes, many could be expelled, and those who remain could be forced to stop their predations, and the lack of respect for English culture/authority could be curtailed. It’s been done in the past; have we somehow lost all ability to defend ourselves?
Now I don’t deny this ethnic cohort may be over-represented relative to their general numbers,
�
So, WHY was it racist to report on the ethnicity of the Groomers? Were the victims of the groomers all color-blind? There must be a reason why the English authorities refused to expose all those White/Celtic/Saxon Groomers….
Raped by Afghan, Pregnant Woman Pleaded for Help But Three Pakistanis Passing by Raped Her Too
Breitbart, June 27, 2021
An Afghan migrant raped a 25-year-old pregnant woman in an Athens [Greece] neighbourhood, and when she begged for help from three Pakistanis passing by, they raped her, too.
Grooming Gangs Come from Diverse Backgrounds', Says Home Office
The Independent, December 16, 2020
Grooming gangs come from "diverse backgrounds", a Home Office review has concluded.
The research, originally promised by Sajid Javid in 2018, was published on Tuesday following a government U-turn.
The Home Office previously said releasing the paper would not be in the "public interest", in response to a Freedom of Information request by The Independent, but committed to making it public after a petition signed by more than 130,000 people.
The paper said that although a number of high-profile grooming cases, including Rotherham, Rochdale and Telford mainly involved men of Pakistani ethnicity, "links between ethnicity and this form of offending" could not be proven.
"Some studies suggest an over-representation of black and Asian offenders relative to the demographics of national populations. However, it is not possible to conclude that this is representative of all group-based CSE offending."
Child Sex Abuse Inquiry Refused to Probe Rotherham and Rochdale Grooming Gangs as It's Scared of Being Called Racist'
The Sun, October 24, 2020
A CHILD sex abuse inquiry reportedly refused to probe Rotherham and Rochdale grooming gangs as it is "scared of being called racist".
Sammy Woodhouse, a victim of a Rotherham gang, blasted the public inquiry has "not placed survivors at the forefront" of the probe.
â€They are trying to bury what happened in places like Rotherham and Rochdale because they're scared of being called racist."
And Sarah Champion, a campaigner for child victims, questioned the decision to not hear evidence on the northern grooming networks.
�
How does denying the issue of disproportionate black/brown violence/crime/low IQ/inherent resentment/dysfunctional proclivities help us?
How we address this issue is more important than pointing out it exists.
�
Lucky you. Have you seen what’s going on in El Salvador? The impossible, according to you, is happening therein. Bukele’s not even White; he looks Persian. He has European ancestry. Maybe he’s an Aryan of yore (Odysseus claims there was a swarthy Aryan sect). In any event, he’s not a Mestizo, but El Salvador is full of them.Replies: @muh muh
Hardly a Mestizo to be seen.
�
Can’t we say exactly this about most of our “defenders,†i.e., Douglas Murray?
I really couldn’t tell you why he loves Jews so much, but for whatever reason he does
�
That’s both interesting and unfortunate information on Robinson. It has been a few years since I followed his travails, but I remember being impressed with him after watching an interview on a show with that sanctimonious twit, Piers Morgan; he held his own with Piers and with a few others, as well. Qualifications about “my colored friends†don’t usually register with me, because “they†all say it, often (in my opinion) because they feel it must be said in order to prevent accusations of racism and bigotry.
I would say he does not care much about “White†Britain, and I’ll explain why….
�
Post links with your claims or don’t bother posting!
https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=887654860066159&set=a.638081525023495
This is the best summary of the #TommyRobinson saga so far.
– who took the time to painstakingly read through all the court documents and explain them in easy to understand terms.
This is the best summary of the #TommyRobinson saga so far.
Credit to @Politic56721677 – who took the time to painstakingly read through all the court documents and explain them in easy to understand terms.
Full video: https://t.co/AytUAMehRX pic.twitter.com/qsFNxwPC7e
— Lucy Brown (@lucymarionbrown) July 28, 2024
The EDL have paedophiles in their ranks but Tommy Robinson evidently doesn’t condemn them!
Sure, and they're probably more disproportionately represented in that group than grooming gang members are in the general population of Pakistani immigrants and their progeny.But it's a waste of time and energy to pursue this angle, since you're only going to elicit angry responses that point to the greater severity of crimes committed by grooming gangs as well as the allegation that gang members aren't arrested due to political correctness.And round and round and round it goes... the maddening calliope of Zionist instigation, leaving us all dizzied, dissatisfied, and distempered, just as our enemies prefer.Aside from having us literally kill each other, could they ask for a better outcome?Replies: @Anonymous 1
The EDL have paedophiles in their ranks but Tommy Robinson evidently doesn’t condemn them!
�
Is there a specific claim I made about Robinson that is under dispute?
Post links with your claims or don’t bother posting!
�
I understand that Robinson is currently in jail for a contempt of court charge; that’s all I know to date. Perhaps he has contempt for English authority/court. He would be foolish to do anything other than publicly deny he was aware/duly noticed of a proceeding; in fact, he shouldn’t be speaking on it publicly, at all. Maybe a little Taqiyya is in order for a few English lads these days…what’s good for the Jihadis is good for the Golden Geese.
who took the time to painstakingly read through all the court documents and explain them in easy to understand terms.
�
Full interview is here: https://archive.org/details/youtube-Bv0TW2LF_dE
So, four years later is when I formed the English Defense League. And from the outset, we were welcome to every colour, every race, everybody. So, I formed the English Defense League in 2009. I wanna get onto the far-right label 'cause this is provable as well. The media called it far right. From the start, we had a Sikh leader, Guramit Singh, okay? Great lad. We've done more to educate the British public and the predominantly white working-class community of what Sikhs have given, what other minorities have given into the UK. And the reason being, I'm from Luton Town. The majority of my friends aren't white. So, the ethos of the English Defense League started with my mindset. We had a Sikh division, a Hindu division. We had a lesbian and gay division. We had a Jewish division. We had divisions from every community. Doesn't sound very far right.
�
I really couldn’t tell you why he loves Jews so much, but for whatever reason he does
Can’t we say exactly this about most of our “defenders,†i.e., Douglas Murray?
Murray is gay, so he quite naturally abhors Islamic fundamentalism; he’s unflinching in his support/defense of European culture/society; he rails brilliantly against the current Moorish invasion of Europe, yet stops short at identifying the primary culprit of the ongoing degradation and assault on European people/culture/territory.
So, the question remains – is Tommy Robinson a knowing/willing Jewish operative (same goes for Murray) or has he been conditioned to ally with Jewry/Israel? Or, is he picking the lesser of two evils? Or, was he targeted early and brought into the “conservative†Jewish fold?
In any event, the proliferation of Muslims and Jews within European nations has been devastating for Europe. I don’t need some operative muddying the waters to understand/recognize this notion/fact. I’m sure you feel/see things in a similar fashion.
I would say he does not care much about “White†Britain, and I’ll explain why….
That’s both interesting and unfortunate information on Robinson. It has been a few years since I followed his travails, but I remember being impressed with him after watching an interview on a show with that sanctimonious twit, Piers Morgan; he held his own with Piers and with a few others, as well. Qualifications about “my colored friends†don’t usually register with me, because “they†all say it, often (in my opinion) because they feel it must be said in order to prevent accusations of racism and bigotry.
So, here’s my personal experience and my observations on Whites who hammer on about wonderful non-White friends/neighbors – I will qualify – I do know wonderful Mestizo men/women; individual behaviors and group behaviors are different animals; the manner in which Mestizos (or other outgroups) behave due to White/European influences (or jackboots) is not the accurate measure of their inherent sensibilities/capabilities, i.e., Mexico is what it is because it’s full of Mexicans. It’s a shit-hole nation despite the numerous resources/advantages within the territory.
Robinson is not much younger than me; like me, he likely experienced a gradual influx of non-whites into White spaces/institutions. When in a small minority, they will toe the white line, so to speak. It is generally those Whites who do NOT live, work, attend school, observe, or prosecute minorities, as a regional majority or as a large-enough-minority-to-revert-to-typical-behaviors, who persist in spouting platitudes about One Race!; my colored friends!; I care not for the browning of America/England, blah, blah, blah…
If one doesn’t live with/amongst/in close proximity to the consequences of racial/cultural “liberalism,†one can cleave to righteous indignation over those racists and bigoted Saxons/“Nazis.†I remember well the admonitions/lectures on race relations that I received from my Scandinavian exchange-student friends; Scandinavians are learning the hard way these days that the White girl from Texas knew what she was talking about.
So, Robinson has seen, up close and personal, the worst of the reality of multicultural intersectionality/relativism and the horrific consequences of censoring/obscurement of the obvious truth/results of same, yet he persists in denying what I believe he likely knows or suspects to be patently true regarding the nature/source of the problem. Why? Perhaps he is familiar with the fate of those who challenge all the way to the precipice, like say Jim Traficant or Adolf Hitler, and he wants to avoid being flung off. Or, maybe he’s just a Jewish operative.
I believe the former; I could be wrong. It’s belief that gets us there.
What a horrible state of affairs. He also has a great passage about his personal hero:
Equal if not greater ignorance can be found in America. A poll carried out in 2020 found that almost two-thirds of Americans between the ages of eighteen and thirty-nine had no idea that 6 million Jews were killed in the Holocaust. According to the study, almost half of Americans in their twenties and thirties could not name a single concentration camp or ghetto established by the Nazis during World War II. About one in eight young Americans (12 percent) said that they had not heard of the Holocaust or didn’t think that they had heard of it.
�
He thinks it's way out of line to refer to such a great man as "a drunk".
Churchill had been right on many things in his long career, as he had been wrong on some, but identifying the menace of Hitler early on in the 1930s and urging rearmament and facing down the appeasers made him—even before his conduct of the war—one of the great figures of any period in history. Many people talk of fascism and antifascism, but here, without doubt, was the twentieth century’s greatest antifascist. If anything, his reputation only grew in the decades after his death. In 2002, he beat off all competition to be voted by the British public as “The Greatest Briton†of all time.
�
So he has no solutions, just more MLK, and his book is just complaining about leftists and their hypocrisy.Replies: @Tiptoethrutulips
the only way to transcend the divisions is to forge “a civic culture that respects both differences and commonalities.†And the only way this can be done “is through education that seeks to comprehend the diversity of human culture.†And to recognize that “any human being sufficiently curious and motivated can fully possess another culture, no matter how ‘alien’ it may appear to be.â€
�
No dude. lol. I’m an Indian and you’re just coming across as a typical indian with a frothing hatred for everyone. I agree that Jayant Bhandari goes overboard(I follow him actively on social media), but he’s spot on 80% here.
Bacha Bazi in northwestern Pakistan, which borders Afghanistan. The ethnic group concerned is identical. I suggested that if the Taliban, a group whose very origins lie in the fight to eliminate the practice, prevailed in the region where it's currently engaged in fighting, 'twould be better.Which, contrary to your claim, is not a straw man argument. Not by a long shot.
I made an assertion about
�
In fact, I didn't. So I researched it:I was bombarded with death threats from far right and Al Qaeda after prosecuting Rochdale sex ring
Besides, I know you know what happened to our Righteous Pakistani for his defense of gang-raped White girls.
�
The precise term for that is 'trolling'.
I wander about literarily, to make general points and take swipes; I do this intentionally and with a specific purpose.
�
Oh, I'm sure it tickles your echo chamber buddies pink as a baby's spanked bum.And, sure, you've got me coming back for more. Guilty as charged. You see, I occasionally like to indulge trolls. In your case, it allows me to keep a running record of your stellar accomplishments to date, such as:1) calling an innocuous observation 'beyond the pale', thereby proving how easily triggered you are,
I admit this freely, and it’s effective
�
The ethnic group concerned is identical. Which, contrary to your claim, is not a straw man argument. Not by a long shot.
I didn’t cry, straw man! You meandered from rape-y Pakistanis to rape-y Afghans. I understood perfectly well your point. You wrote, “Would that the Taliban prevailed in Pakistan:…†Did you thereby acknowledge that rape/abuse of children is rampant in Pakistan? So, Pakistanis arrive to the UK and poof! No more rape-y proclivities?
And, I previously indicated that there was an ethnic/racial element to the subject behaviors; you protested, and now here you are calling out a specific ethnic group. How about – that’s a hypocrite man! argument?
‘twould be better.
The lesser of two evils? How about we tolerate neither in European society?
When a Taliban raid discovered a woman running an informal school… they beat the children and threw the woman down a flight of stairs…and then imprisoned her. They threatened to stone her family publicly if she refused to sign a declaration of loyalty to the Taliban and their laws.
An Afghan girl named Bibi Aisha was promised to a new family through a tribal method of solving disputes known as baad. When she fled the violence…her new family found her, and a Taliban commander ordered her to be punished as an example…Her ears and nose were cut off and she was left for dead in the mountains, but survived.
In 2013, Indian author Sushmita Banerjee was shot dead by Taliban militants for allegedly defying Taliban dictates. She was married to an Afghan businessman…
On 12 July 2021, a woman in Faryab Province was beaten to death by Taliban militants and her house was set alight because she would not cook for a group of their fighters.
[Wiki]
1. Beyond the pale = Inappropriate for a given occasion or situation. Don’t be ridiculous, Pelican. Are you nitpicking or being a bit hyperbolic?
2. I acknowledged you had a tiny point.
3. That’s an outright false allegation. Don’t be ridiculous, Pelican. Maybe I just choose to identify what I please.
4. I did defend Tommy Robinson. He’s a White guy living amongst rape-y savages from Pakistan and Bangladesh. So what? (And, I have repeatedly said I don’t know what Musk is up to.) Name anyone in America/UK (with significant government/cultural power/influence) besides Thomas Massie who doesn’t grovel to Israel when pushed? (Massie’s wife died mysteriously; I’m just sayin’…) It’s slim pickins’ out there for us racist haters…I whinge all the time about Whites sticking together- we got to start somewhere.
5. As a group, Pakistanis (and Afghans?) are more prone to rape/sexually abuse women and children. As a group, black Africans are stupid, destructive, and horribly violent; they’re more prone to rape, as well. As a group, Indians are more prone to tolerate garbage and shit, be it human or bovine, floating in the rivers and congesting the byways. You don’t defend rape; you deny reality, statistics, and human biodiversity.
6. I contend that what is deemed as confirmation bias is often observational bias or learned bias. Deny the truth of what is easily observed at your own peril, Pelican. What actually killed Pava LaPere? (Do some homework)
7. What? Pelican? Now, I never said you were an idiot, did I? Don’t be ridiculous and stop whining.
I live in the American sticks, overwhelmingly white
Were you born in America, and what is your ethnicity?
Are you familiar with the TV show, COPS? –
Guy Benson, Townhall, May 31, 2011
[…] Ben [Shapiro] has provided another short clip exclusively to Townhall, this time featuring an interview he conducted with John Langley, the creator of the long-running FOX program, COPS. Langley says he’s irked by some media critics who accuse the show of perpetuating stereotypes about “people of color†by depicting a disproportionate percentage of minority suspects. Au Contraire, Langley protests, he intentionally shows an inordinate number of white suspects in order to side-step the facts. “I show more white people than, statistically, what the truth is.â€
So, is Langley a Jewish operative?
In Texas, Mestizos are called White on their booking/charge sheets, so official crime statistics are clearly skewed against actual Whites. If you spend any time in a District Attorney’s office, or even by a cursory perusal of crime records, you get a clear picture of who is more prone to sexual/general violence. Is Texas a Jewish operative?
So, you acknowledged that it would be foolish to conclude that most White men in the sticks are wife beaters. How large is the minority population in the sticks where you abide, and did you choose to live amongst White StickPeople?
you’re a piker
Is that an ad hominem attack? I had to look for a definition of piker. I don’t think it’s applicable to me.
But go with your bad self, tiptoe. I know you can’t help it. 🕶ï¸
Are you suggesting I should be more humble? That’s good advice, Pelican. I’ll work on it.
You mentioned northwestern Pakistan specifically, which is comprised of the same ethnic group (Pashtun) as resides in southern Afghanistan. Your concern is with ethnicity, right?If ethnicity is your concern, how is this 'meandering'?Look, dude... This is, quite frankly, getting tiresome, so I'll focus on your comment that seems to cut to the heart of the matter, since I don't think readers here have a whole lot of patience for either of us right now -- if, that is, they're even paying attention anymore:
You meandered from rape-y Pakistanis to rape-y Afghans.
�
No, not at all.The statistic I have yet to see is the percentage of Pakistani immigrants (naturalized or otherwise) who are part of these grooming gangs. I'd venture to say it's still a small minority relative to their general population, though I would like to confirm this.Now I don't deny this ethnic cohort may be over-represented relative to their general numbers, but even if this is so, the notion that trumpeting these stats far and wide will ever result in the wholesale removal of the Pakistani population from Britain or any other European country is a pie-in-the-sky fantasy. Furthermore, even if you proscribed their immigration tomorrow, that's not going to solve the problem.The more practical solution, as such, is to actually apply the law without fear that police are running afoul of some politically correct code of conduct. In fact, the penalty for this kind of crime should be made far more severe, as it is in most Muslim dominant countries. That, too, may be wishful thinking, but it's a more easily attainable goal than some kind of ethnic cleansing campaign.Poster Colin Wright has called for a moratorium on *all* immigration, which, in my opinion, is also unrealistic, but I'm still in favor of establishing more restrictive quotas.In summary, I'm looking for results, not just statistics. The fact that sexually explicit material is 'consumed' far more in America than in any other nation on earth doesn't interest me as much as its damaging social effects, including, but not limited to, the deterioration of family life and plummeting birth rates. How we address this issue is more important than pointing out it exists.FWIW, I'm a white American, born and raised, and the minority population where I live (well north of Texas) is, in fact, quite small. Hardly a Mestizo to be seen.Replies: @muh muh, @Tiptoethrutulips
[Y]ou deny reality, statistics, and human biodiversity.
�
Full interview is here: https://archive.org/details/youtube-Bv0TW2LF_dE
So, four years later is when I formed the English Defense League. And from the outset, we were welcome to every colour, every race, everybody. So, I formed the English Defense League in 2009. I wanna get onto the far-right label 'cause this is provable as well. The media called it far right. From the start, we had a Sikh leader, Guramit Singh, okay? Great lad. We've done more to educate the British public and the predominantly white working-class community of what Sikhs have given, what other minorities have given into the UK. And the reason being, I'm from Luton Town. The majority of my friends aren't white. So, the ethos of the English Defense League started with my mindset. We had a Sikh division, a Hindu division. We had a lesbian and gay division. We had a Jewish division. We had divisions from every community. Doesn't sound very far right.
�
“Tommy started an organization called the English Defense League (EDL) in 2009.”
The Zionist asset and Treasonous Coke Head Tommy 4 Names Robinson did not start the EDL.
Who Really Ran The EDL.
The EDL chain of command was as follows ;
A) Christine Brim who set up the Centre For Vigilant Freedom and who works for the Neo-Conservative and Zionist Centre for Security Policy
B) Then we have Chris Knowles the British director of the Centre for Vigilant Freedom who sits on the board of directors of the Centre for Vigiliant Freedom
C) Alan Lake who works with the International Civil Liberties Alliance which was set up by the Centre for Vigiliant Freedom
D) Tommy Robinson
https://zionistedl.blogspot.com/2011/11/who-really-runs-edl.html?m=1
Bacha Bazi in northwestern Pakistan, which borders Afghanistan. The ethnic group concerned is identical. I suggested that if the Taliban, a group whose very origins lie in the fight to eliminate the practice, prevailed in the region where it's currently engaged in fighting, 'twould be better.Which, contrary to your claim, is not a straw man argument. Not by a long shot.
I made an assertion about
�
In fact, I didn't. So I researched it:I was bombarded with death threats from far right and Al Qaeda after prosecuting Rochdale sex ring
Besides, I know you know what happened to our Righteous Pakistani for his defense of gang-raped White girls.
�
The precise term for that is 'trolling'.
I wander about literarily, to make general points and take swipes; I do this intentionally and with a specific purpose.
�
Oh, I'm sure it tickles your echo chamber buddies pink as a baby's spanked bum.And, sure, you've got me coming back for more. Guilty as charged. You see, I occasionally like to indulge trolls. In your case, it allows me to keep a running record of your stellar accomplishments to date, such as:1) calling an innocuous observation 'beyond the pale', thereby proving how easily triggered you are,
I admit this freely, and it’s effective
�
Douglas Murray, Neoconservativism, and the Culture of Child Sexual Abuse.
Abdullah Noorudeen.
At the time of writing, outrage surrounding the topic of child sexual abuse in the UK, sensationalised as “grooming gangsâ€, is being manufactured and stoked by a cabal of Zionists, chief amongst them, billionaires Elon Musk and Bill Ackman.
The anti-Muslim propaganda consists of a cocktail of hyperbole and outright falsehoods, debunked ironically by Grok AI, Musk’s “source of truth†(see here and here). For a more rigorous dissection of the so-called “grooming gang†propaganda.
As part of this onslaught, Musk has repeatedly supported Tommy Robinson and his “grooming gangs†narrative.
Before delving into their shared animus toward Islam and Muslims, it is worth highlighting another key area where Robinson serves Musk’s interests: their stance on the migration of Indians for labour. Robinson has openly called for the borders to be opened to “Hindus and Sikhs†(see here), a stance that dovetails neatly with Elon Musk’s MAGA-enraging advocacy for the H-1B visa programme, which facilitates the migration of Indian workers to the US.
It’s no mere coincidence that Robinson’s “grooming gangs†narratives spring up as the Zionist propaganda machine – driven by a well-oiled, freshly funded hasbara campaign – looks to divert attention. Instead of the ongoing genocide perpetrated by the Zionist terror regime, the spotlight is redirected onto Islam and Muslims, with “grooming gangs†serving as the latest rhetorical weapon in a digital war of distraction. The pattern is all too clear: every major Zionist account on ‘X’ seems to be amplifying the same blusterous propaganda….
Murray Grooming Musk
In this regard, Musk’s boosting of Robinson’s agenda points to another hand at play: Douglas Murray.
As we have documented in some detail, Murray and Robinson are connected, with the latter mobilising popular expression for the former’s anti-Muslim rhetoric. This dynamic was apparent in November 2023, when, in opposition to a pro-Palestine march, Murray called for the “people of Britain†to “stop these barbariansâ€. Soon after Musk activated Robinson’s ‘X’ account, who then went to work practically implementing Murray’s call. This led to Robinson’s followers engaging in violence and injuring police officers on the day of the march.
Relevant here is Musk’s ideological grooming at the hands of Murray, as recently evidenced by Musk’s endorsement of the book, The Strange Death of Europe…..
https://muslimskeptic.com/2025/01/07/douglas-murray-child-abuse/
Who CARES if they join the Church of England and become devout attendees at Sunday services clutching the Book of Common Prayer? They’re neither English nor Celtic. They do not belong in Great Britain or Ireland. They should all go, REGARDLESS of their religious or political beliefs.
Interesting. Now do Jews.Replies: @Carney
They’re neither English nor Celtic. They do not belong in Great Britain or Ireland.
�
Indians are world champion in three things: gang rapes, open air defecation (including canadian beaches) and beggars.
We can add those three reasons to why the hostile elite want them in the United States.
Did Call the Midwife TV version avoid this plot line about a Paki Pimp?
I made an assertion about rape-y Pakistanis; you posted a blurb about rape-y Afghans. ?
My, but you are fond of straw man arguments.
�
Nope.
you took me to task for omitting some of his biographical details. I invited you to fill me in on those.
Did you forget already?
�
Uh huh.
No. I show up and respond to what I please.
�
I made an assertion about
Bacha Bazi in northwestern Pakistan, which borders Afghanistan. The ethnic group concerned is identical. I suggested that if the Taliban, a group whose very origins lie in the fight to eliminate the practice, prevailed in the region where it’s currently engaged in fighting, ‘twould be better.
Which, contrary to your claim, is not a straw man argument. Not by a long shot.
Besides, I know you know what happened to our Righteous Pakistani for his defense of gang-raped White girls.
In fact, I didn’t. So I researched it:
I was bombarded with death threats from far right and Al Qaeda after prosecuting Rochdale sex ring
https://www.the-sun.com/news/744439/nazir-afzal-prosecutor-death-threat-rochdale-sex-ring/
Looks as if Afzal’s an equal opportunity offender — of extremists, that is.
I wander about literarily, to make general points and take swipes; I do this intentionally and with a specific purpose.
The precise term for that is ‘trolling’.
I admit this freely, and it’s effective
Oh, I’m sure it tickles your echo chamber buddies pink as a baby’s spanked bum.
And, sure, you’ve got me coming back for more. Guilty as charged.
You see, I occasionally like to indulge trolls. In your case, it allows me to keep a running record of your stellar accomplishments to date, such as:
1) calling an innocuous observation ‘beyond the pale’, thereby proving how easily triggered you are,
2) demonstrating your inability to distinguish a sincere comment from sarcasm,
3) demonstrating your inability to identify the subject of a sentence,
4) defending unapologetic Zionist influencers Tommy Robinson and Elon Musk,
5) falsely accusing me of defending rapists (on numerous occasions),
6) demonstrating ignorance of confirmation bias while engaging in it routinely and falsely accusing me of the same, and
7) resorting to ad hominem attacks when you’ve failed to get a rise out of me.
I live in the American sticks, overwhelmingly white. I once had a police scanner, which allowed me to regularly keep track of local law enforcement activity in my area. Had I documented every instance of domestic abuse I heard about, including a racial profile of the offenders, I suppose I could lead some folks to believe the white men here are overwhelmingly represented by wife beaters.
If, that is, those folks are stupid.
That’s pretty much the corollary of what you offer, which doesn’t reach me in the least. I’ve been online for well over three decades and, trust me, you’re a piker compared to what I’ve seen in that time.
But go with your bad self, tiptoe.
I know you can’t help it. 🕶ï¸
I didn’t cry, straw man! You meandered from rape-y Pakistanis to rape-y Afghans. I understood perfectly well your point. You wrote, “Would that the Taliban prevailed in Pakistan:…†Did you thereby acknowledge that rape/abuse of children is rampant in Pakistan? So, Pakistanis arrive to the UK and poof! No more rape-y proclivities?
The ethnic group concerned is identical. Which, contrary to your claim, is not a straw man argument. Not by a long shot.
�
The lesser of two evils? How about we tolerate neither in European society?
‘twould be better.
�
Were you born in America, and what is your ethnicity?
I live in the American sticks, overwhelmingly white
�
Is that an ad hominem attack? I had to look for a definition of piker. I don’t think it’s applicable to me.
you’re a piker
�
Are you suggesting I should be more humble? That’s good advice, Pelican. I’ll work on it.Replies: @muh muh
But go with your bad self, tiptoe. I know you can’t help it. 🕶ï¸
�
I really couldn’t tell you why he loves Jews so much, but for whatever reason he does. My interest in him in this thread is simply to properly identify what kind of political activist he is and has been.
I would say he does not care much about “White” Britain, and I’ll explain why.
If you take Muslims out of the equation, then Tommy mostly disappears from the political arena. So, for example, if you replace Muslims in Britain with Sikhs and displaced Africans from the Caribbean, then Tommy disappears. If you replace Muslims in Britain with Taiwanese, Hindus, and Mexicans, then Tommy disappears. However, he might show up to fight “Nazis” if they appear.
There are certain virtue signals that Tommy always gives in his interviews. One of them is “most of my friends aren’t white”. Something else he often says is, “White nationalists hate me and think I’m a race traitor.” He has also implied that multiculturalism works fine as long as Muslims aren’t involved. He also probably thinks race mixing is an overall good thing. I’ve discerned these sentiments from various social media posts and interviews.
He also seems to favor Sikhs particularly, along with Jews. To give some background on that, Tommy started an organization called the English Defense League (EDL) in 2009. It was some kind of anti-Muslim street activist group, and the members were basically soccer hooligans and young men in general. It was a real “multicultural success”, at least for a while. In an interview with Jordan Peterson last year, Tommy described the EDL:
So, four years later is when I formed the English Defense League. And from the outset, we were welcome to every colour, every race, everybody. So, I formed the English Defense League in 2009. I wanna get onto the far-right label ’cause this is provable as well. The media called it far right. From the start, we had a Sikh leader, Guramit Singh, okay? Great lad. We’ve done more to educate the British public and the predominantly white working-class community of what Sikhs have given, what other minorities have given into the UK. And the reason being, I’m from Luton Town. The majority of my friends aren’t white. So, the ethos of the English Defense League started with my mindset. We had a Sikh division, a Hindu division. We had a lesbian and gay division. We had a Jewish division. We had divisions from every community. Doesn’t sound very far right.
Full interview is here: https://archive.org/details/youtube-Bv0TW2LF_dE
The part about the EDL starts around 24 minutes, 10 seconds.
Before he started the EDL, Tommy joined the British National Party (BNP), which was a nationalist organization in Britain which has since dissolved. He says he joined because at the time, they were the only ones talking about the Muslim issue in Britain. Tommy says he joined for one year, ostensibly less than a year, and decided to leave because they were too racist and antisemitic. Not only that, but he also says he told BNP members that he would run them out of his hometown of Luton… so I guess free speech has it’s limits. He then started the EDL as an alternative and opponent of the BNP. He basically wanted to save young men from the perils of racism and antisemitism and redirect them against the real enemy: Islamo-fascists.
I have a video of EDL members burning a NSDAP flag, but apparently the group was attracting too many racist and antisemitic types anyway, so Tommy left the organization and it basically dissolved. All in all, there’s not much about Tommy that is “pro-White”, and there’s plenty of things that are “anti-White”. He’s proud that he helped destroy the BNP, which was a nationalist organization that opposed all non-White immigration, and he wants nothing to do with White nationalists. He’s made it clear as day that he wants them nowhere near his rallies. Tommy has suffered, but he’s kind of an idiot and he has wealthy friends in high places who always seem to save his ass. I’m quite sure he feels no sympathy with all the White nationalists suffering in British prisons since he regularly disparages such people. He would probably rather deport them as opposed to his “many” Sikh and non-White friends.
The Zionist asset and Treasonous Coke Head Tommy 4 Names Robinson did not start the EDL.
"Tommy started an organization called the English Defense League (EDL) in 2009." �
Can’t we say exactly this about most of our “defenders,†i.e., Douglas Murray?
I really couldn’t tell you why he loves Jews so much, but for whatever reason he does
�
That’s both interesting and unfortunate information on Robinson. It has been a few years since I followed his travails, but I remember being impressed with him after watching an interview on a show with that sanctimonious twit, Piers Morgan; he held his own with Piers and with a few others, as well. Qualifications about “my colored friends†don’t usually register with me, because “they†all say it, often (in my opinion) because they feel it must be said in order to prevent accusations of racism and bigotry.
I would say he does not care much about “White†Britain, and I’ll explain why….
�
Replies: @Tiptoethrutulips
Why, then, are some of his [Tommy Robinson's] biggest supporters — financial and otherwise — a loose coalition of reactionary, self-proclaimed pro-Israel backers?
According to a recent investigation by The Guardian, Robinson is being bankrolled by a nexus of international organizations. Many of those groups, it turns out, are part of the American right-wing infrastructure supporting the Israeli cause.
The Philadelphia-based think tank Middle East Forum is one of the British extremist’s biggest sponsors. Daniel Pipes, MEF’s president, confirmed to The Times of Israel that his group has spent roughly $60,000 on three demonstrations defending Robinson’s legal trial.
Pipes said that he first met Robinson in December 2017 and was “impressed†by him. He described Robinson as part of a group of people who are “trying to sustain their civilization, trying to keep Europe Europe, trying to keep the West the West. Overall, I think that their effort is sound and needed.â€
Robert Shillman, a US-based billionaire who gives frequently to Israeli institutions, financed a fellowship that payed for a position Robinson held in 2017 with a right-wing Canadian website, The Rebel Media, according to The Guardian. (Shillman did not respond to requests for comment.)
Other groups, including the Gatestone Institute, an Israel-focused think tank, and the far-right David Horowitz Freedom Center, have published a series of pieces defending Robinson. One on the Gatestone website was titled, “Swift Injustice: The Case of Tommy Robinson.†(The piece’s author, Bruce Bawer, also did not respond to requests for comment.)
Far-right activist Horowitz emailed The Guardian: “Tommy Robinson is a courageous Englishman who has risked his life to expose the rape epidemic of young girls conducted by Muslim gangs and covered up by your shameful government.â€
...Both the MEF and Gatestone are funded by Nina Rosenwald, a self-described “ardent Zionist†and American Jewish philanthropist who co-chairs American Securities Management, and who founded the Gatestone Institute. (Rosenwald did not respond to a request for comment.) Gatestone also receives millions in donations from the Mercer family, who are one of US President Donald Trump’s top financial backers.
�
I like David Horowitz, but he doesn’t budge on support of Israel/hatred of Palestinians. He freely admits that his Jewish parents housed Russian communists in their basement in America and that the Black Panthers were communist tools, who were also murderous thugs – he’s a bit like Shapiro/Prager in his method. Maybe they honestly believe Europeans and Jews should work together. I suspect they honestly believe Jews are meant to rule us all, as ordained by God, one way or another. Bobby Fischer they ain’t…
I suppose the question is – does Robinson acquiesce to support from “conservative†Jews because he believes in Judeo-Christian values or because he has no other choice? The Pelican is correct that Jewry seems to sow discord wherever/whenever they can; are they all in on it, or are they just consummate meddlers/vindicators, inherently attempting to make everyone else confused and miserable? It’s a combination of both, I think.
Either way, Tommy Robinson seems genuinely concerned for White Britain; he’s suffered greatly for his efforts. I’ll bet if enough nationalist-Whites would assert themselves on his behalf, he wouldn’t have to grovel to Jews and the They’re Not All Like That Brigade. I mean, how hard would it be to convince him of Jewish perfidy if he doesn’t already know of it?
Full interview is here: https://archive.org/details/youtube-Bv0TW2LF_dE
So, four years later is when I formed the English Defense League. And from the outset, we were welcome to every colour, every race, everybody. So, I formed the English Defense League in 2009. I wanna get onto the far-right label 'cause this is provable as well. The media called it far right. From the start, we had a Sikh leader, Guramit Singh, okay? Great lad. We've done more to educate the British public and the predominantly white working-class community of what Sikhs have given, what other minorities have given into the UK. And the reason being, I'm from Luton Town. The majority of my friends aren't white. So, the ethos of the English Defense League started with my mindset. We had a Sikh division, a Hindu division. We had a lesbian and gay division. We had a Jewish division. We had divisions from every community. Doesn't sound very far right.
�
My, but you are fond of straw man arguments.What is that... Four? Five, already? Between that and your terrible comprehension of English, I've lost count.
So, sure, let’s blame America for the pedophiliac cultural practices of Afghans.
�
Not exactly, but then again, precision isn't exactly your strong suit.The point to be made is that not all ethnic Pakistanis are cut from the same cloth, which, contrary to your petulant denial, I've made successfully. I don't agree with the advocate on a number of issues, but that's irrelevant for our purposes here.In your previous post, you took me to task for omitting some of his biographical details. I invited you to fill me in on those.Did you forget already?
You were simply trying to make a point about righteous Pakistani Muslims
�
No. I show up and respond to what I please.If you want to pick nits, that's your business, not mine.Replies: @Tiptoethrutulips
You keep showing up for a nitpicking.
�
My, but you are fond of straw man arguments.
I made an assertion about rape-y Pakistanis; you posted a blurb about rape-y Afghans. ?
I stand by my assertions on Pakistanis, as a group. I wander about literarily, to make general points and take swipes; I do this intentionally and with a specific purpose. I admit this freely, and it’s effective because the points and swipes are accurate and based on precedent and current/obvious (though often denied/obscured) facts/observations/statistics, i.e., Detroit was NOT ruined by Democrats; we all know the primary cause of Detroit’s fall.
You mostly make excuses for your general ineptitude and confirmation biases.
you took me to task for omitting some of his biographical details. I invited you to fill me in on those.
Did you forget already?
Nope.
Well, my little clipped Pelican, perhaps you should do your own damn homework? Besides, I know you know what happened to our Righteous Pakistani for his defense of gang-raped White girls. So, there’s yet another similarity between adherents of Islam and Judaism – it’s a crime/it’s forbidden to oppose each other in the sanctioned war against Saxon/Amalek/Infidel Supremacy/Rule.
No. I show up and respond to what I please.
Uh huh.
BREAKING NEWS LONDON –
Woolwich bus stabbing: Schoolboy, 14, knifed to death on London double decker ‘was aspiring rapper’
…He [Kelyan] is thought to have been an aspiring rapper… under the name “Grippa”. His latest track “Bangers & Mash” was released on Christmas Day.
Around an hour before he was killed, Kelyan posted a message on Instagram, asking if any of his followers had a “mindy”, according to MailOnline which reported this is believed to be a reference to Somalian for “knife”.
So, there you go, Pelican; we can’t blame the Pakistanis for this one. You win? Can we blame that little troll Sadiq Khan? Born in Tooting, South London, to a British Pakistani family…. No wonder London is now so rape-y, black-y, stab-y, slummy, Detroit-y, hijab-y, Ganges-y, flying acid everywhere…to be fair, Pig Churchill is to blame, as well.
Do they know it’s Christmas time again in Somalia? Should White Folks Heal The World? Seems like a bunch of Light of the World operatives are mucking about everywhere.
Bacha Bazi in northwestern Pakistan, which borders Afghanistan. The ethnic group concerned is identical. I suggested that if the Taliban, a group whose very origins lie in the fight to eliminate the practice, prevailed in the region where it's currently engaged in fighting, 'twould be better.Which, contrary to your claim, is not a straw man argument. Not by a long shot.
I made an assertion about
�
In fact, I didn't. So I researched it:I was bombarded with death threats from far right and Al Qaeda after prosecuting Rochdale sex ring
Besides, I know you know what happened to our Righteous Pakistani for his defense of gang-raped White girls.
�
The precise term for that is 'trolling'.
I wander about literarily, to make general points and take swipes; I do this intentionally and with a specific purpose.
�
Oh, I'm sure it tickles your echo chamber buddies pink as a baby's spanked bum.And, sure, you've got me coming back for more. Guilty as charged. You see, I occasionally like to indulge trolls. In your case, it allows me to keep a running record of your stellar accomplishments to date, such as:1) calling an innocuous observation 'beyond the pale', thereby proving how easily triggered you are,
I admit this freely, and it’s effective
�
The proper term is observational bias. (Have you been colluding with CorvinusLaPere?) Haven’t we been here before? - “My bias is the natural consequence of observation, perusal of crime statistics, travel, study, and acceptance of Reality.â€Any confirmation bias indicative within your previous post below? -
it’s obvious you embrace those findings at face value due to your confirmation bias.
�
So, sure, let’s blame America for the pedophiliac cultural practices of Afghans. And, Afghanistan is a world away from Pakistan, so…And, if America were not meddling in Afghanistan, the practice of bacha bazi would not exist, so…Invade the world…save the world…which is it?
American soldiers have been instructed not to intervene—in some cases, not even when their Afghan allies have abused boys on military bases…—and doing little when they began abusing children. Military lawyer Annie Barry Bruton commented that “both the Pentagon and the White House declined to take responsibility for inaction on the part of the U.S. government and instead shifted the blame to the Afghan governmentâ€
�
I have no clue what he’s up to. How many times must I say it? Are you a Jewish operative? Perhaps he’s thrown in with Tommy Robinson as a Jew operative to stir up the Whites against the browns/blacks to keep our focus off Israel, as without the Jewish support of those White agitators, we Whites would never have occasion to be displeased with the rancid fruits of non-White immigration because those browns/blacks only do what they do because of Jewish support. So, all Muslims, Mestizos, Africans, and Pajeets are de facto Jewish operatives?Is Doulas Murray a Jewish operative? He certainly supports Israel. He certainly wants Muslims out of the UK. I think many Whites have been conditioned to accept the Judeo-Christian mumbo jumbo, and they need not be an operative to support Israel’s agenda.
he must be playing 156 dimensional chess, right?
�
And, yet here you are. Again. Still. You keep showing up for a nitpicking. By all means, fly away, Pelican.
Compulsively vomited walls of text are a real turn off for me, and I can’t be bothered to spend time with every little nit you’d like to pick.
�
You were simply trying to make a point about righteous Pakistani Muslims. You failed; now you’re making excuses for your failure.No one suggests, nor do I, that every single Muslim on earth is a violent rapist, child molester, machete-wielding/acid-tossing psychopath; as a group, Muslims/Arabs from the Middle East/Africa should not be permitted to reside within European nations. Of course, they’re not the only group that should be prohibited thusly.
That doesn’t obligate me to set forth biographical details.
�
Yes, that’s what I’ve been told by you and your ilk. Your ilk being - CorvinusLaPere; Franny; Francis, the Fake Belgian; Gelding; Tagliatelle360; Dario Gabbai…it’s almost as if you’re all Jewish operatives.
People like you are a godsend to them…. The rage throughout your posts is palpable
�
The machinations/conduct of alien groups within European nations, including America, have made me who/what I am. That, and my Celtic/Germanic ancestry, therefore I am the classic enemy/target of the World’s Aristocrats and the World’s Untermensch.Replies: @muh muh
since it’s probably become part and parcel of who you are,
�
So, sure, let’s blame America for the pedophiliac cultural practices of Afghans.
My, but you are fond of straw man arguments.
What is that… Four? Five, already?
Between that and your terrible comprehension of English, I’ve lost count.
You were simply trying to make a point about righteous Pakistani Muslims
Not exactly, but then again, precision isn’t exactly your strong suit.
The point to be made is that not all ethnic Pakistanis are cut from the same cloth, which, contrary to your petulant denial, I’ve made successfully. I don’t agree with the advocate on a number of issues, but that’s irrelevant for our purposes here.
In your previous post, you took me to task for omitting some of his biographical details. I invited you to fill me in on those.
Did you forget already?
You keep showing up for a nitpicking.
No. I show up and respond to what I please.
If you want to pick nits, that’s your business, not mine.
I made an assertion about rape-y Pakistanis; you posted a blurb about rape-y Afghans. ?
My, but you are fond of straw man arguments.
�
Nope.
you took me to task for omitting some of his biographical details. I invited you to fill me in on those.
Did you forget already?
�
Uh huh.
No. I show up and respond to what I please.
�
lolIt's way worse than 'getting around to it'. Do your homework:How the Israel lobby fueled the rise of Britain’s top anti-Muslim chaos agent
I do find it hard to believe someone so well informed on the ongoing migration “crisis†does not get around to the Jewish impetus of it.
�
Not to me.From what I've seen, they want both factions eternally subordinated, and if they can instigate fighting between them, all the better.People like you are a godsend to them.
It’s obvious to me that Organized Jewry prefers Muslims/Islam over Saxons/Christians as their One World underlings.
�
Sure, I do.Pakistan is currently an American satrap being used as a proxy army against the Taliban. Just as our institutions of academia are staffed largely by left-leaning professors -- as opposed to your ridiculous straw man caricature -- so too are Pakistan's, its Muslim dominant population notwithstanding. (That's the nature of universities worldwide.) This isn't to say the women's studies prof is entirely incorrect in her findings, but it's obvious you embrace those findings at face value due to your confirmation bias.That much is undeniable.
You think you got it?
�
Yes, let's wait and see. Like Q, he must be playing 156 dimensional chess, right?
Let’s see if he turns out to be a crypto Jew-hater first.
�
No, I was quite honest about that. Compulsively vomited walls of text are a real turn off for me, and I can't be bothered to spend time with every little nit you'd like to pick.
Liar.
�
Well, I simply provided a tweet showing a Muslim of Pakistani origin was responsible for the prosecution of grooming gangs. That doesn't obligate me to set forth biographical details.But since you feel neglected, perhaps you yourself can share with us what that fate was.
Yes, I’m well aware of his actions and his resultant fate for punishing fellow Muslims/Arabs, which for some strange reason, you neglected to include in your post.
�
Actually, you're *quite* triggered.The rage throughout your posts is palpable. You might be oblivious to it, since it's probably become part and parcel of who you are, but I'm certain others than me see it as well.Replies: @Tiptoethrutulips
Nor am I easily offended/triggered.
�
it’s obvious you embrace those findings at face value due to your confirmation bias.
The proper term is observational bias. (Have you been colluding with CorvinusLaPere?) Haven’t we been here before? – “My bias is the natural consequence of observation, perusal of crime statistics, travel, study, and acceptance of Reality.â€
Any confirmation bias indicative within your previous post below? –
American soldiers have been instructed not to intervene—in some cases, not even when their Afghan allies have abused boys on military bases…—and doing little when they began abusing children. Military lawyer Annie Barry Bruton commented that “both the Pentagon and the White House declined to take responsibility for inaction on the part of the U.S. government and instead shifted the blame to the Afghan governmentâ€
So, sure, let’s blame America for the pedophiliac cultural practices of Afghans. And, Afghanistan is a world away from Pakistan, so…And, if America were not meddling in Afghanistan, the practice of bacha bazi would not exist, so…
Invade the world…save the world…which is it?
he must be playing 156 dimensional chess, right?
I have no clue what he’s up to. How many times must I say it? Are you a Jewish operative? Perhaps he’s thrown in with Tommy Robinson as a Jew operative to stir up the Whites against the browns/blacks to keep our focus off Israel, as without the Jewish support of those White agitators, we Whites would never have occasion to be displeased with the rancid fruits of non-White immigration because those browns/blacks only do what they do because of Jewish support. So, all Muslims, Mestizos, Africans, and Pajeets are de facto Jewish operatives?
Is Doulas Murray a Jewish operative? He certainly supports Israel. He certainly wants Muslims out of the UK. I think many Whites have been conditioned to accept the Judeo-Christian mumbo jumbo, and they need not be an operative to support Israel’s agenda.
Compulsively vomited walls of text are a real turn off for me, and I can’t be bothered to spend time with every little nit you’d like to pick.
And, yet here you are. Again. Still. You keep showing up for a nitpicking. By all means, fly away, Pelican.
That doesn’t obligate me to set forth biographical details.
You were simply trying to make a point about righteous Pakistani Muslims. You failed; now you’re making excuses for your failure.
No one suggests, nor do I, that every single Muslim on earth is a violent rapist, child molester, machete-wielding/acid-tossing psychopath; as a group, Muslims/Arabs from the Middle East/Africa should not be permitted to reside within European nations. Of course, they’re not the only group that should be prohibited thusly.
People like you are a godsend to them…. The rage throughout your posts is palpable
Yes, that’s what I’ve been told by you and your ilk. Your ilk being – CorvinusLaPere; Franny; Francis, the Fake Belgian; Gelding; Tagliatelle360; Dario Gabbai…it’s almost as if you’re all Jewish operatives.
since it’s probably become part and parcel of who you are,
The machinations/conduct of alien groups within European nations, including America, have made me who/what I am. That, and my Celtic/Germanic ancestry, therefore I am the classic enemy/target of the World’s Aristocrats and the World’s Untermensch.
My, but you are fond of straw man arguments.What is that... Four? Five, already? Between that and your terrible comprehension of English, I've lost count.
So, sure, let’s blame America for the pedophiliac cultural practices of Afghans.
�
Not exactly, but then again, precision isn't exactly your strong suit.The point to be made is that not all ethnic Pakistanis are cut from the same cloth, which, contrary to your petulant denial, I've made successfully. I don't agree with the advocate on a number of issues, but that's irrelevant for our purposes here.In your previous post, you took me to task for omitting some of his biographical details. I invited you to fill me in on those.Did you forget already?
You were simply trying to make a point about righteous Pakistani Muslims
�
No. I show up and respond to what I please.If you want to pick nits, that's your business, not mine.Replies: @Tiptoethrutulips
You keep showing up for a nitpicking.
�
That’s what “they†say about everyone who doesn’t name the Jew. I suspect he is like many Europeans these days - a Martin Luther Kang sycophant who must qualify his disdain for certain aliens whilst claiming - only the bad ones are bad for Britain!
Jew operative
�
You think you got it? I can and do delineate a substantial difference between an American/European third-wave, man-hating, bash-the-White-patriarchy, Swiftie and a female professor from the Muslim world who advocates against 9 yo brides, literal circle jerks with lone women, and revenge/sanctioned gang-rape. You got nothin’.
So you lean on liberals when it suits you, then condemn them when it doesn’t.
Got it.
�
Ha! Not yet. Let’s see if he turns out to be a crypto Jew-hater first.
Riding Elon’s balls
�
Liar.
If I don’t address a comment or question of yours, it isn’t because I can’t. It’s because you’re too getting too boring to address at length.
�
Yes, I’m well aware of his actions and his resultant fate for punishing fellow Muslims/Arabs, which for some strange reason, you neglected to include in your post.
By the way:
�
I don’t actually take advice from Muslims. Or, idiots. Or, Jews.
Uh huh.
�
I’m surprised people aren’t aware of Tommy Robinson because he’s been around for a long, long time. I first became aware of him in 2017, and he was known then as a “Shabbos Goy”. I would say he advocates for essentially the same things as his friends: Alex Jones and Laura Loomer.
Here’s some background from a liberal Zionist news source:
Why, then, are some of his [Tommy Robinson’s] biggest supporters — financial and otherwise — a loose coalition of reactionary, self-proclaimed pro-Israel backers?
According to a recent investigation by The Guardian, Robinson is being bankrolled by a nexus of international organizations. Many of those groups, it turns out, are part of the American right-wing infrastructure supporting the Israeli cause.
The Philadelphia-based think tank Middle East Forum is one of the British extremist’s biggest sponsors. Daniel Pipes, MEF’s president, confirmed to The Times of Israel that his group has spent roughly $60,000 on three demonstrations defending Robinson’s legal trial.
Pipes said that he first met Robinson in December 2017 and was “impressed†by him. He described Robinson as part of a group of people who are “trying to sustain their civilization, trying to keep Europe Europe, trying to keep the West the West. Overall, I think that their effort is sound and needed.â€
Robert Shillman, a US-based billionaire who gives frequently to Israeli institutions, financed a fellowship that payed for a position Robinson held in 2017 with a right-wing Canadian website, The Rebel Media, according to The Guardian. (Shillman did not respond to requests for comment.)
Other groups, including the Gatestone Institute, an Israel-focused think tank, and the far-right David Horowitz Freedom Center, have published a series of pieces defending Robinson. One on the Gatestone website was titled, “Swift Injustice: The Case of Tommy Robinson.†(The piece’s author, Bruce Bawer, also did not respond to requests for comment.)
Far-right activist Horowitz emailed The Guardian: “Tommy Robinson is a courageous Englishman who has risked his life to expose the rape epidemic of young girls conducted by Muslim gangs and covered up by your shameful government.â€
…Both the MEF and Gatestone are funded by Nina Rosenwald, a self-described “ardent Zionist†and American Jewish philanthropist who co-chairs American Securities Management, and who founded the Gatestone Institute. (Rosenwald did not respond to a request for comment.) Gatestone also receives millions in donations from the Mercer family, who are one of US President Donald Trump’s top financial backers.
Let me see who TOMMY ROBINSON is and ‘What can pro-Israel entities gain from backing Tommy Robinson?’ A lot
Dr Anas Altikriti. The CEO and Founder of The Cordoba Foundation repeated widely shared claims that Robinson and his financiers are linked to the Zionist state of Israel and that the far-right protest on British streets were retribution for British solidarity with Palestinians in Gaza.
Europe & Russia,Israel,Middle East,News,Palestine,UK
Far-right extremist Tommy Robinson rallies in support of Israel
I’m not making that up. They really see themselves as above Americans.
Sounds like they’ve got it right to me! ;-D
Absolutely sickening, How White men can even think to couple with their women is a mystery bigger than UFOs and an empty Ft. Knox.
It’s their wonderful personalities and soothing voices.
No sweeter sound than a Brahmin woman nagging her miserable husband at the quickie mart.
DURKA DURKA YOU MARKED DOWN THE DONUTS TOO EARLY
You can see the love as she looks at her husband/7-11 owner like total garbage.
What kind of White man wouldn’t line up for that?
These people actually view themselves as superior man-gods that birthed civilized society and fate has chosen the Brahmin to lead us all.
I’m not making that up. They really see themselves as above Americans.
Sounds like they've got it right to me! ;-D
I’m not making that up. They really see themselves as above Americans.
�
I wonder how she and other pajeetas keep those disgusting nasal growths from flying off
Nose Ring.
A very insightful and hard-hitting essay! .
A corrupt money corrupts everything it touches and Ashkhenazim Jews have founded our currency system and control it to the detriment of Eurocaucasians!—and everyone else….Mass immigration is one of their ploys.
See http://www.LetJusticePrevailThoughTheHeavensFall.com and scroll down past bio information to read and critique a proposed Constitutional Amendment wresting control of our monetary system from their vile hands.
That’s what “they†say about everyone who doesn’t name the Jew. I suspect he is like many Europeans these days - a Martin Luther Kang sycophant who must qualify his disdain for certain aliens whilst claiming - only the bad ones are bad for Britain!
Jew operative
�
You think you got it? I can and do delineate a substantial difference between an American/European third-wave, man-hating, bash-the-White-patriarchy, Swiftie and a female professor from the Muslim world who advocates against 9 yo brides, literal circle jerks with lone women, and revenge/sanctioned gang-rape. You got nothin’.
So you lean on liberals when it suits you, then condemn them when it doesn’t.
Got it.
�
Ha! Not yet. Let’s see if he turns out to be a crypto Jew-hater first.
Riding Elon’s balls
�
Liar.
If I don’t address a comment or question of yours, it isn’t because I can’t. It’s because you’re too getting too boring to address at length.
�
Yes, I’m well aware of his actions and his resultant fate for punishing fellow Muslims/Arabs, which for some strange reason, you neglected to include in your post.
By the way:
�
I don’t actually take advice from Muslims. Or, idiots. Or, Jews.
Uh huh.
�
I do find it hard to believe someone so well informed on the ongoing migration “crisis†does not get around to the Jewish impetus of it.
lol
It’s way worse than ‘getting around to it’. Do your homework:
How the Israel lobby fueled the rise of Britain’s top anti-Muslim chaos agent
https://thegrayzone.com/2024/10/25/israel-lobby-britains-anti-muslim-chaos-agent/
It’s obvious to me that Organized Jewry prefers Muslims/Islam over Saxons/Christians as their One World underlings.
Not to me.
From what I’ve seen, they want both factions eternally subordinated, and if they can instigate fighting between them, all the better.
People like you are a godsend to them.
You think you got it?
Sure, I do.
Pakistan is currently an American satrap being used as a proxy army against the Taliban. Just as our institutions of academia are staffed largely by left-leaning professors — as opposed to your ridiculous straw man caricature — so too are Pakistan’s, its Muslim dominant population notwithstanding. (That’s the nature of universities worldwide.) This isn’t to say the women’s studies prof is entirely incorrect in her findings, but it’s obvious you embrace those findings at face value due to your confirmation bias.
That much is undeniable.
Let’s see if he turns out to be a crypto Jew-hater first.
Yes, let’s wait and see. Like Q, he must be playing 156 dimensional chess, right?
Liar.
No, I was quite honest about that. Compulsively vomited walls of text are a real turn off for me, and I can’t be bothered to spend time with every little nit you’d like to pick.
Yes, I’m well aware of his actions and his resultant fate for punishing fellow Muslims/Arabs, which for some strange reason, you neglected to include in your post.
Well, I simply provided a tweet showing a Muslim of Pakistani origin was responsible for the prosecution of grooming gangs. That doesn’t obligate me to set forth biographical details.
But since you feel neglected, perhaps you yourself can share with us what that fate was.
Nor am I easily offended/triggered.
Actually, you’re *quite* triggered.
The rage throughout your posts is palpable. You might be oblivious to it, since it’s probably become part and parcel of who you are, but I’m certain others than me see it as well.
The proper term is observational bias. (Have you been colluding with CorvinusLaPere?) Haven’t we been here before? - “My bias is the natural consequence of observation, perusal of crime statistics, travel, study, and acceptance of Reality.â€Any confirmation bias indicative within your previous post below? -
it’s obvious you embrace those findings at face value due to your confirmation bias.
�
So, sure, let’s blame America for the pedophiliac cultural practices of Afghans. And, Afghanistan is a world away from Pakistan, so…And, if America were not meddling in Afghanistan, the practice of bacha bazi would not exist, so…Invade the world…save the world…which is it?
American soldiers have been instructed not to intervene—in some cases, not even when their Afghan allies have abused boys on military bases…—and doing little when they began abusing children. Military lawyer Annie Barry Bruton commented that “both the Pentagon and the White House declined to take responsibility for inaction on the part of the U.S. government and instead shifted the blame to the Afghan governmentâ€
�
I have no clue what he’s up to. How many times must I say it? Are you a Jewish operative? Perhaps he’s thrown in with Tommy Robinson as a Jew operative to stir up the Whites against the browns/blacks to keep our focus off Israel, as without the Jewish support of those White agitators, we Whites would never have occasion to be displeased with the rancid fruits of non-White immigration because those browns/blacks only do what they do because of Jewish support. So, all Muslims, Mestizos, Africans, and Pajeets are de facto Jewish operatives?Is Doulas Murray a Jewish operative? He certainly supports Israel. He certainly wants Muslims out of the UK. I think many Whites have been conditioned to accept the Judeo-Christian mumbo jumbo, and they need not be an operative to support Israel’s agenda.
he must be playing 156 dimensional chess, right?
�
And, yet here you are. Again. Still. You keep showing up for a nitpicking. By all means, fly away, Pelican.
Compulsively vomited walls of text are a real turn off for me, and I can’t be bothered to spend time with every little nit you’d like to pick.
�
You were simply trying to make a point about righteous Pakistani Muslims. You failed; now you’re making excuses for your failure.No one suggests, nor do I, that every single Muslim on earth is a violent rapist, child molester, machete-wielding/acid-tossing psychopath; as a group, Muslims/Arabs from the Middle East/Africa should not be permitted to reside within European nations. Of course, they’re not the only group that should be prohibited thusly.
That doesn’t obligate me to set forth biographical details.
�
Yes, that’s what I’ve been told by you and your ilk. Your ilk being - CorvinusLaPere; Franny; Francis, the Fake Belgian; Gelding; Tagliatelle360; Dario Gabbai…it’s almost as if you’re all Jewish operatives.
People like you are a godsend to them…. The rage throughout your posts is palpable
�
The machinations/conduct of alien groups within European nations, including America, have made me who/what I am. That, and my Celtic/Germanic ancestry, therefore I am the classic enemy/target of the World’s Aristocrats and the World’s Untermensch.Replies: @muh muh
since it’s probably become part and parcel of who you are,
�
Jew operative. (See above.)
Tommy Robinson
�
So you lean on liberals when it suits you, then condemn them when it doesn't.Got it.
Women’s Studies professor
�
Straw man.
If you persist in defending rapey Pakistanis
�
Would that the Taliban prevailed in Pakistan:
The practice of Bacha bazi
�
Riding Elon's balls, you write:
According to some accounts, the practice of bacha bazi by warlords was one of the key factors in Mullah Omar mobilizing the Taliban.[25][14] Reportedly, in early 1994, Omar led 30 men armed with 16 rifles to free two young girls who had been kidnapped and raped by a warlord, hanging him from a tank gun barrel.[31] Another instance arose when in 1994, a few months before the Taliban took control of Kandahar, two militia commanders confronted each other over a young boy whom they both wanted to sodomize. In the ensuing fight, Omar's group freed the boy; appeals soon flooded in for Omar to intercede in other disputes. His movement gained momentum through the year and he quickly gathered recruits from Islamic schools totaling 12,000 by the year's end with some Pakistani volunteers. [...]In 2015, The New York Times reported that U.S. soldiers serving in Afghanistan were instructed by their commanders to ignore child sexual abuse being carried out by Afghan security forces, except "when rape is being used as a weapon of war". American soldiers have been instructed not to intervene—in some cases, not even when their Afghan allies have abused boys on military bases, according to interviews and court records. But the U.S. soldiers have been increasingly troubled that instead of weeding out pedophiles, the U.S. military was arming them against the Taliban and placing them as the police commanders of villages—and doing little when they began abusing children.[48][49] Military lawyer Annie Barry Bruton commented that "both the Pentagon and the White House declined to take responsibility for inaction on the part of the U.S. government and instead shifted the blame to the Afghan government".[50]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bacha_bazi
�
And yet, curiously, he pretends he is a statesman.Fact is, I'm kind of glad he's unintentionally exposing not only his serial neurosis, but the reality of how American politics functions: to the highest bidder.
Elon Musk is not a statesman; he is an entrepreneur.
�
No, thanks.If I don't address a comment or question of yours, it isn't because I can't. It's because you're too getting too boring to address at length.By the way:https://twitter.com/smile2jannah/status/1876634741333508421Replies: @Tiptoethrutulips
Let me help you with this
�
Jew operative
That’s what “they†say about everyone who doesn’t name the Jew. I suspect he is like many Europeans these days – a Martin Luther Kang sycophant who must qualify his disdain for certain aliens whilst claiming – only the bad ones are bad for Britain!
The only applicable qualification is – they’re all bad for Britain.
I do find it hard to believe someone so well informed on the ongoing migration “crisis†does not get around to the Jewish impetus of it. But, I appreciate him for what he’s done and I don’t want to pile on.
It’s obvious to me that Organized Jewry prefers Muslims/Islam over Saxons/Christians as their One World underlings. The marked similarities in Judaism/Islam is apparent upon even a cursory study, and frankly, it’s absolutely possible, and feasible, for nimrod Europeans to focus on two deleterious forces within Europa at once. There’s no need for all the bait and switch accusations constantly bandied about; I’m tired of it; the only option is to rid ourselves of you all.
So you lean on liberals when it suits you, then condemn them when it doesn’t.
Got it.
You think you got it? I can and do delineate a substantial difference between an American/European third-wave, man-hating, bash-the-White-patriarchy, Swiftie and a female professor from the Muslim world who advocates against 9 yo brides, literal circle jerks with lone women, and revenge/sanctioned gang-rape. You got nothin’.
An 18-year-old girl…gets off a suburban train with some Lebanese-Australian men… and so begins a horror journey into night; it only ends when she has been sexually assaulted by 14 men and raped twenty-five times…She is just the latest in a series of gang-rapes with ugly racial overtones…
“I’d never heard of a gang-rape until it happened to me.†[ said no Pakistani woman ever…]
Bankstown is the typical Aussie melting pot with a bit of Asia and the Middle East thrown into the suburban mix…. [60 Minutes, 2002]
Riding Elon’s balls
Ha! Not yet. Let’s see if he turns out to be a crypto Jew-hater first.
If I don’t address a comment or question of yours, it isn’t because I can’t. It’s because you’re too getting too boring to address at length.
Liar.
By the way:
Yes, I’m well aware of his actions and his resultant fate for punishing fellow Muslims/Arabs, which for some strange reason, you neglected to include in your post.
Uh huh.
I don’t actually take advice from Muslims. Or, idiots. Or, Jews.
Nor am I easily offended/triggered.
lolIt's way worse than 'getting around to it'. Do your homework:How the Israel lobby fueled the rise of Britain’s top anti-Muslim chaos agent
I do find it hard to believe someone so well informed on the ongoing migration “crisis†does not get around to the Jewish impetus of it.
�
Not to me.From what I've seen, they want both factions eternally subordinated, and if they can instigate fighting between them, all the better.People like you are a godsend to them.
It’s obvious to me that Organized Jewry prefers Muslims/Islam over Saxons/Christians as their One World underlings.
�
Sure, I do.Pakistan is currently an American satrap being used as a proxy army against the Taliban. Just as our institutions of academia are staffed largely by left-leaning professors -- as opposed to your ridiculous straw man caricature -- so too are Pakistan's, its Muslim dominant population notwithstanding. (That's the nature of universities worldwide.) This isn't to say the women's studies prof is entirely incorrect in her findings, but it's obvious you embrace those findings at face value due to your confirmation bias.That much is undeniable.
You think you got it?
�
Yes, let's wait and see. Like Q, he must be playing 156 dimensional chess, right?
Let’s see if he turns out to be a crypto Jew-hater first.
�
No, I was quite honest about that. Compulsively vomited walls of text are a real turn off for me, and I can't be bothered to spend time with every little nit you'd like to pick.
Liar.
�
Well, I simply provided a tweet showing a Muslim of Pakistani origin was responsible for the prosecution of grooming gangs. That doesn't obligate me to set forth biographical details.But since you feel neglected, perhaps you yourself can share with us what that fate was.
Yes, I’m well aware of his actions and his resultant fate for punishing fellow Muslims/Arabs, which for some strange reason, you neglected to include in your post.
�
Actually, you're *quite* triggered.The rage throughout your posts is palpable. You might be oblivious to it, since it's probably become part and parcel of who you are, but I'm certain others than me see it as well.Replies: @Tiptoethrutulips
Nor am I easily offended/triggered.
�
Replies: @Tiptoethrutulips
Why, then, are some of his [Tommy Robinson's] biggest supporters — financial and otherwise — a loose coalition of reactionary, self-proclaimed pro-Israel backers?
According to a recent investigation by The Guardian, Robinson is being bankrolled by a nexus of international organizations. Many of those groups, it turns out, are part of the American right-wing infrastructure supporting the Israeli cause.
The Philadelphia-based think tank Middle East Forum is one of the British extremist’s biggest sponsors. Daniel Pipes, MEF’s president, confirmed to The Times of Israel that his group has spent roughly $60,000 on three demonstrations defending Robinson’s legal trial.
Pipes said that he first met Robinson in December 2017 and was “impressed†by him. He described Robinson as part of a group of people who are “trying to sustain their civilization, trying to keep Europe Europe, trying to keep the West the West. Overall, I think that their effort is sound and needed.â€
Robert Shillman, a US-based billionaire who gives frequently to Israeli institutions, financed a fellowship that payed for a position Robinson held in 2017 with a right-wing Canadian website, The Rebel Media, according to The Guardian. (Shillman did not respond to requests for comment.)
Other groups, including the Gatestone Institute, an Israel-focused think tank, and the far-right David Horowitz Freedom Center, have published a series of pieces defending Robinson. One on the Gatestone website was titled, “Swift Injustice: The Case of Tommy Robinson.†(The piece’s author, Bruce Bawer, also did not respond to requests for comment.)
Far-right activist Horowitz emailed The Guardian: “Tommy Robinson is a courageous Englishman who has risked his life to expose the rape epidemic of young girls conducted by Muslim gangs and covered up by your shameful government.â€
...Both the MEF and Gatestone are funded by Nina Rosenwald, a self-described “ardent Zionist†and American Jewish philanthropist who co-chairs American Securities Management, and who founded the Gatestone Institute. (Rosenwald did not respond to a request for comment.) Gatestone also receives millions in donations from the Mercer family, who are one of US President Donald Trump’s top financial backers.
�
Absolutely sickening, How White men can even think to couple with their women is a mystery bigger than UFOs and an empty Ft. Knox. I remember a co-worker who lusted after a green card pajeeta……right up until the day she walked past us and reeked of monkey-ass and rotten sweet peas left out for a week.
Tried to warn him, but he would not listen.
Elon Musk: Winning American hearts and minds
.@elonmusk will be complicit in the medical MURDER of a 14-year-old boy named Samuel. pic.twitter.com/S9NT6qvIVN
— Stew Peters (@realstewpeters) January 6, 2025
Why is Elon Musk focusing on British grooming gangs, and not focused on Jeffrey Epstein's client list?
— illuminatibot (@iluminatibot) January 6, 2025
He said, “We know that Muslims and Zionists are always unanimous like a horde..â€
but Odyssey’s assertion has been debunked, so getting all hot and bothered about it
�
Poisoned by the Jewess of Rhaibar? Who contests this particular conspiracy theory? The Jews? I don’t know and I don’t care, but I do find it interesting that biblical Jews have been assassinating/killing their rivals since the days of yore. I also find the similarities in sanctioned Islamic/Judaic lying/deception/conquest interesting.
poisoned lamb served by a Jewish woman, though this is typically contested
�
I have studied on it. I think Herzl was assassinated by Jews/Zionists for seeking to compromise/negotiate with Gentiles over the Return and for encouraging Jewish assimilation into Gentile society.
If you think nationalism of the ethnic variety is inimical to Jewry, you should study what Theodore Herzl said about Zionists forging an alliance with anti-semites.
�
Exactly. There is no such thing. Have you ever heard of Judeo-Christian values? Westerners are harangued over it non-stop.
What the hell is ‘Judeo-Islamic mumbo-jumbo’ even supposed to mean?
�
I’ll work on it.
You would definitely do well to calm down and strive for both brevity and clarity in your comments
�
I see your point, but - Ha! The World’s Largest Military Force hasn’t won a war since the Revolution (or maybe since 1812; I’m sure that conflict had nefarious objectives). Of course, the difference between our military serving in the wars/conflicts of the 20th century is that they were intentionally sacrificed/undermined then, whereas now we are infested with females and untermensch incapable of waging war like proper Saxons. I’m not so sure we could hold our own for very long. Who knows? Maybe directed energy weapons are real, and if they are, we’ve got them; and if we have them, “we†are toast, regardless.
The practical consideration that Israel holds a nuclear trump card… that the world’s largest military force would certainly come to its assistance
�
me: You would definitely do well to calm down and strive for both brevity and clarity in your comments
you: I’ll work on it.
Uh huh.
Once was at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in NYC. And saw a piece of ‘modern art’ worth 150k. What was it you ask? It was a fluorescent office tube in a slant position.
Another work of genius, was a giant canvas, 8ft tall, 15 ft wide. painted brown. No designs, just flat brown, which was worth 300k.
Of course, White goys fell for the hooked-nosed scheme. The wine industry is another huge kike scam.
I wonder how she and other pajeetas keep those disgusting nasal growths from flying off during a bout of outraged cackling and head-wagging.
I cannot work today because my child is sick! (for the 1,000,000 consecutive time) And you are saying that I have to do work today! (on the most important day of a corporate project) My child! My child! My child!
Once had an idiot boss who called us employees in on a weekend, where we had to track down the pajeeta contractors, who then, after finally gracing us with their presence, bitched and moaned about working on a weekend……
until our boss (a red-haired, White jackass) kept FT employees in the office and let the pajeeta contractors go home after 1 hour in office whom were paid a full day’s worth of overtime on the company dime.
Nose Ring.
I wonder how she and other pajeetas keep those disgusting nasal growths from flying off
�
Well, Tommy Robinson and thousands of English girls would say otherwise.
My own experience with Pakistani folk hasn’t brought me anywhere close to rapists
�
Elon Musk is not a statesman; he is an entrepreneur. He is in for a rude awakening when dealing with the monstrosity of a bureaucratic government entrenched with swamp creatures and kosher money. He can’t just snap his fingers and fire everyone. On reverence for MolochPeople, he certainly knows what the Jews did to South Africa, and so do the Pajeets, so I guess we’ll soon see what they’re up to.
in spite of not being a head of state responsible for the fate of millions, he enthusiastically worships him.
�
Let me help you with this - Adolf Hitler/NSDAP. King Edward, too. Now, the Germans were impressive, but probably not to you.
Really, none of you should ever ask why the west is so compromised by Jews. - Besides Israel-created Hamas, who else is currently cleaning Israel’s clock? Who ever did?
�
Tommy Robinson
Jew operative. (See above.)
Women’s Studies professor
So you lean on liberals when it suits you, then condemn them when it doesn’t.
Got it.
If you persist in defending rapey Pakistanis
Straw man.
The practice of Bacha bazi
Would that the Taliban prevailed in Pakistan:
According to some accounts, the practice of bacha bazi by warlords was one of the key factors in Mullah Omar mobilizing the Taliban.[25][14] Reportedly, in early 1994, Omar led 30 men armed with 16 rifles to free two young girls who had been kidnapped and raped by a warlord, hanging him from a tank gun barrel.[31] Another instance arose when in 1994, a few months before the Taliban took control of Kandahar, two militia commanders confronted each other over a young boy whom they both wanted to sodomize. In the ensuing fight, Omar’s group freed the boy; appeals soon flooded in for Omar to intercede in other disputes. His movement gained momentum through the year and he quickly gathered recruits from Islamic schools totaling 12,000 by the year’s end with some Pakistani volunteers. […]
In 2015, The New York Times reported that U.S. soldiers serving in Afghanistan were instructed by their commanders to ignore child sexual abuse being carried out by Afghan security forces, except “when rape is being used as a weapon of war”. American soldiers have been instructed not to intervene—in some cases, not even when their Afghan allies have abused boys on military bases, according to interviews and court records. But the U.S. soldiers have been increasingly troubled that instead of weeding out pedophiles, the U.S. military was arming them against the Taliban and placing them as the police commanders of villages—and doing little when they began abusing children.[48][49] Military lawyer Annie Barry Bruton commented that “both the Pentagon and the White House declined to take responsibility for inaction on the part of the U.S. government and instead shifted the blame to the Afghan government”.[50]
Riding Elon’s balls, you write:
Elon Musk is not a statesman; he is an entrepreneur.
And yet, curiously, he pretends he is a statesman.
Fact is, I’m kind of glad he’s unintentionally exposing not only his serial neurosis, but the reality of how American politics functions: to the highest bidder.
Let me help you with this
No, thanks.
If I don’t address a comment or question of yours, it isn’t because I can’t. It’s because you’re too getting too boring to address at length.
By the way:
The chief prosecutor Nazir Afzal who dealt with the Rochdale grooming gang was a Pakistani Muslim. He got them convicted and put away, since then he helped lock away thousands more. But you won't see them mentioning this. pic.twitter.com/TaWa2C2fRq
— smile2jannah (@smile2jannah) January 7, 2025
That’s what “they†say about everyone who doesn’t name the Jew. I suspect he is like many Europeans these days - a Martin Luther Kang sycophant who must qualify his disdain for certain aliens whilst claiming - only the bad ones are bad for Britain!
Jew operative
�
You think you got it? I can and do delineate a substantial difference between an American/European third-wave, man-hating, bash-the-White-patriarchy, Swiftie and a female professor from the Muslim world who advocates against 9 yo brides, literal circle jerks with lone women, and revenge/sanctioned gang-rape. You got nothin’.
So you lean on liberals when it suits you, then condemn them when it doesn’t.
Got it.
�
Ha! Not yet. Let’s see if he turns out to be a crypto Jew-hater first.
Riding Elon’s balls
�
Liar.
If I don’t address a comment or question of yours, it isn’t because I can’t. It’s because you’re too getting too boring to address at length.
�
Yes, I’m well aware of his actions and his resultant fate for punishing fellow Muslims/Arabs, which for some strange reason, you neglected to include in your post.
By the way:
�
I don’t actually take advice from Muslims. Or, idiots. Or, Jews.
Uh huh.
�
Well, Tommy Robinson and thousands of English girls would say otherwise.
My own experience with Pakistani folk hasn’t brought me anywhere close to rapists
�
Elon Musk is not a statesman; he is an entrepreneur. He is in for a rude awakening when dealing with the monstrosity of a bureaucratic government entrenched with swamp creatures and kosher money. He can’t just snap his fingers and fire everyone. On reverence for MolochPeople, he certainly knows what the Jews did to South Africa, and so do the Pajeets, so I guess we’ll soon see what they’re up to.
in spite of not being a head of state responsible for the fate of millions, he enthusiastically worships him.
�
Let me help you with this - Adolf Hitler/NSDAP. King Edward, too. Now, the Germans were impressive, but probably not to you.
Really, none of you should ever ask why the west is so compromised by Jews. - Besides Israel-created Hamas, who else is currently cleaning Israel’s clock? Who ever did?
�
Pakis are genetically Indian and just as bottom-feeding. And many 99%’er Whites whine about black savagery, but support these non-human ass and anal hounds. And just imagine, these low IQ backwards, tribal, sand niggers have access to nuclear weapons. The miracle is that they have not launched over something stupid and trivial. (although they have come close many times)
No, not really.My own experience with Pakistani folk hasn't brought me anywhere close to rapists. Perhaps that's because, even if their ethnic cohorts were disproportionately represented among these gangs, the vast majority of them aren't criminals.Of course, that's not a stat Elon or any of his Pavlovian pack hounds are interested in. Not simply because he's 'afraid of Moloch', but because, in spite of not being a head of state responsible for the fate of millions, he enthusiastically worships him.Downplaying what Elon does isn't really a good look, though, especially given his wealth and the influence he wields. He even has Keith Woods forgetting what he said about H1-Bs last week.Impressive.But not to me.https://twitter.com/smalls2672/status/1876254640565874858Replies: @Tiptoethrutulips
Everyone in England/UK knows exactly what/who is ruining/terrorizing England/UK locally regardless of what Elon Musk says. So, do I. So, do you.
�
My own experience with Pakistani folk hasn’t brought me anywhere close to rapists
Well, Tommy Robinson and thousands of English girls would say otherwise.
I think perhaps we should take a peek into what Pakistanis do in Pakistan –
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:
Punishment for rape in Pakistan under the Pakistani laws is either death penalty or imprisonment of between ten and twenty-five years. For cases related to gang rape, the punishment is either death penalty or life imprisonment…
[Oh? Wow! Those Muslims sure know how to handle rapists in their own nations! Well, maybe I was wrong….]
Rape in Pakistan came to international attention after the politically sanctioned rape of Mukhtaran Bibi. The group War Against Rape (WAR) has documented the severity of rape in Pakistan, and the police indifference to it.
According to Women’s Studies professor Shahla Haeri, rape in Pakistan is “often institutionalized and has the tacit and at times the explicit approval of the state”.
According to WAR, over 82% of rapists are family members including fathers, brothers, grandfathers and uncles…The crimes come to light when… pregnant and go to gynecologists for abortion…. According to NGO Sustainable Social Development Organization, reported rapes and sexual assaults soared as much as 400% quarter on quarter during the COVID-19 lockdown, due to Covid restrictions forcing children to remain indoors thus allowing relatives to more frequently abuse them.
Child sexual abuse is widespread in Pakistani schools…out of a sample of 300 children 17% claimed to have been abused and in 1997 one child a day was reported as raped, gang raped or kidnapped for sexual gratification. In September 2014…a documentary called Pakistan’s Hidden Shame, directed by Mohammed Naqvi… highlighted the problem of sexual abuse of street children…an estimated 90 percent of whom have been sexually abused.
The practice of Bacha bazi, a custom involving sexual abuse of adolescent males or boys by older men is reported to be common in the areas of North western Pakistan. While Pakistan has laws for the protection of children and banning of homosexuality, these are rarely enforced and bacha bazi is justified as a cultural tradition.
The Kasur child sexual abuse scandal is a series of child sexual abuses that occurred in Hussain Khanwala village in Kasur District, Punjab, Pakistan from 2006 to 2014…After the discovery of hundreds of video clips showing children performing forced sex acts…
In 2002, when a 12-year-old boy was accused of affair with a woman, the jirga (council of local elders) ordered his elder sister Mukhtar Mai to be gangraped as a revenge. In 2017 a boy raped a 12-year-old girl and the jirga ordered his sister to be raped as revenge…
The end.
If you persist in defending rapey Pakistanis, as a group, you’d better get accustomed to going down in flames.
in spite of not being a head of state responsible for the fate of millions, he enthusiastically worships him.
Elon Musk is not a statesman; he is an entrepreneur. He is in for a rude awakening when dealing with the monstrosity of a bureaucratic government entrenched with swamp creatures and kosher money. He can’t just snap his fingers and fire everyone. On reverence for MolochPeople, he certainly knows what the Jews did to South Africa, and so do the Pajeets, so I guess we’ll soon see what they’re up to.
Really, none of you should ever ask why the west is so compromised by Jews. – Besides Israel-created Hamas, who else is currently cleaning Israel’s clock? Who ever did?
Let me help you with this – Adolf Hitler/NSDAP. King Edward, too. Now, the Germans were impressive, but probably not to you.
My, how the Saxons have fallen. They are the classical enemies of the MolochPeople, as far as I can tell.
Jew operative. (See above.)
Tommy Robinson
�
So you lean on liberals when it suits you, then condemn them when it doesn't.Got it.
Women’s Studies professor
�
Straw man.
If you persist in defending rapey Pakistanis
�
Would that the Taliban prevailed in Pakistan:
The practice of Bacha bazi
�
Riding Elon's balls, you write:
According to some accounts, the practice of bacha bazi by warlords was one of the key factors in Mullah Omar mobilizing the Taliban.[25][14] Reportedly, in early 1994, Omar led 30 men armed with 16 rifles to free two young girls who had been kidnapped and raped by a warlord, hanging him from a tank gun barrel.[31] Another instance arose when in 1994, a few months before the Taliban took control of Kandahar, two militia commanders confronted each other over a young boy whom they both wanted to sodomize. In the ensuing fight, Omar's group freed the boy; appeals soon flooded in for Omar to intercede in other disputes. His movement gained momentum through the year and he quickly gathered recruits from Islamic schools totaling 12,000 by the year's end with some Pakistani volunteers. [...]In 2015, The New York Times reported that U.S. soldiers serving in Afghanistan were instructed by their commanders to ignore child sexual abuse being carried out by Afghan security forces, except "when rape is being used as a weapon of war". American soldiers have been instructed not to intervene—in some cases, not even when their Afghan allies have abused boys on military bases, according to interviews and court records. But the U.S. soldiers have been increasingly troubled that instead of weeding out pedophiles, the U.S. military was arming them against the Taliban and placing them as the police commanders of villages—and doing little when they began abusing children.[48][49] Military lawyer Annie Barry Bruton commented that "both the Pentagon and the White House declined to take responsibility for inaction on the part of the U.S. government and instead shifted the blame to the Afghan government".[50]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bacha_bazi
�
And yet, curiously, he pretends he is a statesman.Fact is, I'm kind of glad he's unintentionally exposing not only his serial neurosis, but the reality of how American politics functions: to the highest bidder.
Elon Musk is not a statesman; he is an entrepreneur.
�
No, thanks.If I don't address a comment or question of yours, it isn't because I can't. It's because you're too getting too boring to address at length.By the way:https://twitter.com/smile2jannah/status/1876634741333508421Replies: @Tiptoethrutulips
Let me help you with this
�
Indians are world champion in three things: gang rapes, open air defecation (including canadian beaches) and beggars. They have the same hygience standards as rodents – just check out their “holy” river where they dump dead bodies and the content of their toilets.
We can add those three reasons to why the hostile elite want them in the United States.
Indians are world champion in three things: gang rapes, open air defecation (including canadian beaches) and beggars.
�
Originally from Khazaria and Mongolia; moved to Poland, Ukraine, Romania, Belarus; now occupy the central governments of every Western nation.
When you live under an occupation government, your women are slaves on the hoof.
Don’t believe me? Ask any German who has the brass to be honest.
Ok, maybe you’ve got a tiny point there, but my Point is - the vast majority of people in America/Europe know exactly whose local behaviors ruin cities, schools, entire nations…Johannesburg began to devolve into the Congo within the first two years of black rule; London is the slash/acid capital of England; Paris is “scary†at night; Detroit can’t read nor maintain any industry; the vast majority of people know the Media is controlled and it colludes to convince us what we observe/inherently know is false. Or, that’s racist!Everyone in England/UK knows exactly what/who is ruining/terrorizing England/UK locally regardless of what Elon Musk says. So, do I. So, do you.Replies: @muh muh
Of course, anyone with even a rudimentary knowledge of English would know what I meant, but go ahead and imagine you’ve got a point to make.
�
Everyone in England/UK knows exactly what/who is ruining/terrorizing England/UK locally regardless of what Elon Musk says. So, do I. So, do you.
No, not really.
My own experience with Pakistani folk hasn’t brought me anywhere close to rapists. Perhaps that’s because, even if their ethnic cohorts were disproportionately represented among these gangs, the vast majority of them aren’t criminals.
Of course, that’s not a stat Elon or any of his Pavlovian pack hounds are interested in. Not simply because he’s ‘afraid of Moloch’, but because, in spite of not being a head of state responsible for the fate of millions, he enthusiastically worships him.
Downplaying what Elon does isn’t really a good look, though, especially given his wealth and the influence he wields. He even has Keith Woods forgetting what he said about H1-Bs last week.
Impressive.
But not to me.
Elon: we need more positive content. Please post something beautiful.
Also Elon: F u retard pic.twitter.com/ku4MX127PH
— Boston Smalls (@smalls2672) January 6, 2025
Well, Tommy Robinson and thousands of English girls would say otherwise.
My own experience with Pakistani folk hasn’t brought me anywhere close to rapists
�
Elon Musk is not a statesman; he is an entrepreneur. He is in for a rude awakening when dealing with the monstrosity of a bureaucratic government entrenched with swamp creatures and kosher money. He can’t just snap his fingers and fire everyone. On reverence for MolochPeople, he certainly knows what the Jews did to South Africa, and so do the Pajeets, so I guess we’ll soon see what they’re up to.
in spite of not being a head of state responsible for the fate of millions, he enthusiastically worships him.
�
Let me help you with this - Adolf Hitler/NSDAP. King Edward, too. Now, the Germans were impressive, but probably not to you.
Really, none of you should ever ask why the west is so compromised by Jews. - Besides Israel-created Hamas, who else is currently cleaning Israel’s clock? Who ever did?
�