“Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time is enemy action.†– Goldfinger
51 people that got the shot on the same day at the same place in NZ were all dead within 6 months. At 1:30 min
https://twitter.com/wunderdarp/status/1902181043429634513?s=46
I suspect Roger Hodkinson has been watching Jimmy Dore again.
I suspect you’re right. The Telegram comment had a link to a shorter version of the video clip you linked to but I was too lazy to upload to Vimeo and post it here.
I’m glad you found it and posted it.
Replies: @Truth Vigilante
This might blow your mind.
Nearly 20 years ago, CBS aired a segment on the flu shot, revealing a shocking truth: despite flu shot uptake among seniors rising from 15% to 65%, flu deaths kept going up.
NIH scientists were devastated. This was not the result they were hoping to find. They assumed other factors must be “masking the true benefits of the shots.â€
“But no matter how they crunched the numbers, they got the same disappointing result. Flu shots have not reduced deaths among the elderly,†@ SharylAttkisson reported.
And when they looked at other countries? They found “the same poor results in Australia, France, Canada, and the UK.â€
So what did the CDC do? They doubled down. Instead of admitting failure, they kept pushing flu shots. Even worse, they turned to a “roundabout way†of protecting seniors—injecting kids to “protect grandma.â€
Sound familiar? They pulled the same stunt during COVID. When the pharmaceutical product didn’t work as promised, they injected kids to “protect grandma†all over again.
“If they were doing this 20 years ago, they managed to make the same mistake again. That’s a little bit hard to believe it’s a mistake.â€
Join 👉 https://t.me/RogerHodkinson
https://t.me/RogerHodkinson/3542
�
I suspect Roger Hodkinson has been watching Jimmy Dore again.
The 8 min video below from The Jimmy Dore Show (quoting the exact same stuff), was posted several days ago:
Video Link
I suspect you’re right. The Telegram comment had a link to a shorter version of the video clip you linked to but I was too lazy to upload to Vimeo and post it here. I’m glad you found it and posted it.
I suspect Roger Hodkinson has been watching Jimmy Dore again.
�
Telegram comment posted by Dr Roger Hodkinson:
This might blow your mind.
Nearly 20 years ago, CBS aired a segment on the flu shot, revealing a shocking truth: despite flu shot uptake among seniors rising from 15% to 65%, flu deaths kept going up.
NIH scientists were devastated. This was not the result they were hoping to find. They assumed other factors must be “masking the true benefits of the shots.â€
“But no matter how they crunched the numbers, they got the same disappointing result. Flu shots have not reduced deaths among the elderly,†@ SharylAttkisson reported.
And when they looked at other countries? They found “the same poor results in Australia, France, Canada, and the UK.â€
So what did the CDC do? They doubled down. Instead of admitting failure, they kept pushing flu shots. Even worse, they turned to a “roundabout way†of protecting seniors—injecting kids to “protect grandma.â€
Sound familiar? They pulled the same stunt during COVID. When the pharmaceutical product didn’t work as promised, they injected kids to “protect grandma†all over again.
“If they were doing this 20 years ago, they managed to make the same mistake again. That’s a little bit hard to believe it’s a mistake.â€
Join 👉 https://t.me/RogerHodkinson
Open Letter to RFK Jr. from Sasha Latypova
“There is no real emergency for COVID in the United Sates or worldwide as you are well aware.”
DOREEN
FEB 25, 2025
Disclaimer
I personally do not advocate any process or procedure contained in any of my Blogs. Information presented here is not intended to provide legal or lawful advice, nor medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, cure, or prevent any disease. Views expressed are for educational purposes only.
Secretary Kennedy, I respectfully ask you to:
Please use your authority to immediately terminate the PREP Act emergency declaration for COVID pandemic, as there is no such emergency in reality.
Please also investigate the misuse and abuse of the federal law utilized in the so-called “pandemic response” and countermeasures that resulted in the greatest human tragedy in recorded history and also destroyed public trust in the government health agencies.
The anti-dote to fear is objectivity
Secretary Kennedy,
All mRNA injections marketed as COVID vaccines today are Emergency Use Authorized (EUA) Military Countermeasures. The EUA pathway is used only when the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services declares an emergency and issues a PREP Act declaration.
Section 564 of the FD&C Act exempts medical countermeasures from the pharmaceutical regulatory compliance or from the informed consent requirements for the duration of the PREP Act declaration of emergency.
While the manufacturers may choose and FDA may ask to undertake some of the activities typically expected from an investigational clinical trial and manufacturing validation process, none of the typical pharmaceutical regulatory standards are applicable in an enforceable way. If there is no enforcement of the law, it’s as if the law does not exist.
Misrepresentations of safety, efficacy or contents of EUA products are allowed by federal law. Thus, claims provided by the federal health authorities or manufacturers cannot be considered reliable sources of information.
When these products are pushed onto unsuspecting consumers, claims about safety, efficacy or contents of these products are based solely on the HHS Secretary’s opinion, which requires no supporting scientific evidence. Today 3 mRNA shots are listed on the CDC Childhood Vaccination Schedule to be given to 9-month old infants.
Secretary Kennedy, are we supposed to think that it is now YOUR opinion that they are safe and effective for babies? I do not believe that, knowing what you know about mRNA injections, you can honestly believe this yourself.
Current PREP Act emergency declaration for COVID was extended by the previous administration by Xavier Becerra to last until December 31, 2029! https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2024-29108.pdf
Real emergencies do not last decades simply based on the opinion of a single public health official. There is no real emergency for COVID in the United Sates or worldwide as you are well aware.
Continued PREP Act declarations, therefore, defy the observed reality and common sense, and represents a misuse and abuse of the federal law which was intended for declaring short-term emergencies in severe situations such as war or acts of terrorism. This law also did not envision shipping of billions of doses of medical products legally allowed to be adulterated and misbranded. Yet, this is precisely what is transpiring under the current PREP Act declaration today.
By keeping the PREP Act declaration in place, the current administration continues to contrive a non-existing emergency. This contrivance serves only the interests of pharmaceutical companies and those institutions that still mandate the shots, shielding them from liability for deaths and injuries caused by the falsely promoted inherently unsafe products.
Clearly, this contrivance does not serve the interests of the public at all. The continued disregard of the victims of the COVID shots under the thorough liability shield of the PREP Act abuses the federal law and destroys any remaining shreds of the public trust in the government health authorities.
5 min video and more at
https://debbielerman.substack.com/p/open-letter-to-rfk-jr-from-sasha
https://www.ourgreaterdestiny.ca/p/open-letter-to-rfk-jr-from-sasha
Here’s a separate link to the short video clip for those who can’t access Telegram…https://vimeo.com/1065489910Replies: @Truth Vigilante
THEY ALL KNEWPfizer Knew - Moderna Knew -
Governments Knew - and they ALL LIED! 💉💀Join 👉 https://t.me/RogerHodkinsonhttps://t.me/RogerHodkinson/3535
�
That video featuring Deborah Murtagh (evidently a New Zealander), was awesome.
I’ve made a note of her name for future reference.
Thanks for that.
Ron Unz, are you reading this? Did you hear what that Kiwi woman had to say*?
(*She quotes some facts drawn from Pfizers own clinical trials – likely stuff she got from reading the book ‘The Pfizer Papers’ by Naomi Wolf).
If she’s lying, by all means refute it. If not, this needs to be addressed in an article in this webzine.
Telegram comment posted by Dr Peter McCullough:
NEW STUDY – COVID-19 Vaccine “Millions of Lives Saved†Claim Debunked by Real-World Data
Statistical analysis dismantles Dr. Peter Hotez’s claim that COVID-19 vaccines saved millions, exposing a contradiction with real-world mortality data. If vaccination saved lives, mortality would have gone down, not up! @NicHulscher @McCulloughFund https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/new-study-covid-19-vaccine-millions?r=14jb45&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false
Thx for sharing, TV.
Check out the video clip in this Telegram comment posted by Dr Roger Hodkinson:
THEY ALL KNEW
Pfizer Knew – Moderna Knew –
Governments Knew – and they ALL LIED! 💉💀Join 👉 https://t.me/RogerHodkinson
Here’s a separate link to the short video clip for those who can’t access Telegram…
https://i.imgur.com/DjZM88W.jpegReplies: @Curle, @Truth Vigilante
In other words, whatever the merits this resolution was a mouse farting.
�
Good stuff Geo.
Meanwhile, we have the following article from the Daily Mail headlined:
‘Breast cancer bombshell: UK deaths from disease set to rocket by over 40 per cent – as mystery surge in under 50’s continues to baffle doctors’.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-14429957/Breast-cancer-UK-deaths-40-cent-doctors-IARC-WHO.html
And yet, in light of all that we now know of the ONGOING catastrophic levels of excess mortality in all the heavily vaxxed countries, some people STILL persist with their uninformed beliefs that All Cause Mortality is back to pre-Covid Psyop levels.
Yes, as the headline of the article states, the doctors are ‘BAFFLED’ – they have absolutely no idea as to what could possibly be causing this.
Jimmy Dore is likewise baffled in response to the news in that article.
Watch the few secs of the video below from 4:10-4:35 for his take on that:
Video Link
Also worth watching from that same video are the few mins from 7:10-11:00, as Pathologist Dr Ryan Cole explains how the mRNA clot shots are decimating your immune system.
Here’s a separate link to the short video clip for those who can’t access Telegram…https://vimeo.com/1065489910Replies: @Truth Vigilante
THEY ALL KNEWPfizer Knew - Moderna Knew -
Governments Knew - and they ALL LIED! 💉💀Join 👉 https://t.me/RogerHodkinsonhttps://t.me/RogerHodkinson/3535
�
Replies: @Curle
As of March 12, 2025, there is no evidence that the Washington State Legislature has scheduled hearings on any bills aiming to ban or restrict mRNA vaccines. A review of the legislature’s committee schedules and agendas does not indicate any such hearings. 
In other states, several legislative bodies have considered bills related to mRNA vaccines:
• Montana: House Bill 371, which proposed banning mRNA vaccines, passed out of the House Judiciary Committee on February 12, 2025, with a 12-8 vote.  However, the full House voted down the bill on February 19, 2025. 
• Iowa: Legislation was introduced to criminalize healthcare professionals administering mRNA vaccines. A subcommittee held a public hearing on March 3, 2025, but the bill faced significant opposition and did not advance. 
• Kentucky, Montana, and Idaho: These states have introduced bills to ban mRNA vaccines, with some passing out of committee. 
It’s important to note that while some state legislatures have considered such bills, none have been enacted into law as of this date.
�
Thanks. To summarize, in one state, Montana, an anti-mRNA bill made it as far as a floor vote in one chamber of the Legislature where it was voted down. That’s a considerably more impressive result than the other states but not results warranting high hopes in my opinion. Seems the promoters are facing an uphill battle.
From ChatGPT:
As of March 12, 2025, there is no evidence that the Washington State Legislature has scheduled hearings on any bills aiming to ban or restrict mRNA vaccines. A review of the legislature’s committee schedules and agendas does not indicate any such hearings. 
In other states, several legislative bodies have considered bills related to mRNA vaccines:
• Montana: House Bill 371, which proposed banning mRNA vaccines, passed out of the House Judiciary Committee on February 12, 2025, with a 12-8 vote.  However, the full House voted down the bill on February 19, 2025. 
• Iowa: Legislation was introduced to criminalize healthcare professionals administering mRNA vaccines. A subcommittee held a public hearing on March 3, 2025, but the bill faced significant opposition and did not advance. 
• Kentucky, Montana, and Idaho: These states have introduced bills to ban mRNA vaccines, with some passing out of committee. It’s important to note that while some state legislatures have considered such bills, none have been enacted into law as of this date.
https://i.imgur.com/DjZM88W.jpegReplies: @Curle, @Truth Vigilante
In other words, whatever the merits this resolution was a mouse farting.
�
The word ‘considering’ plausibly covers any number of hero bills. Hero bills are bills with no hope of receiving a hearing in either legislative chamber that are dropped by sponsors hoping to make some constituent happy. In most state legislatures any individual member can introduce any bill hopeless or not. Merits aside, I would be very surprised if an anti-mRNA bill had any hearing scheduled in either chamber of the Washington state legislature. Do you know otherwise? Has either chamber of that state’s legislature even scheduled a hearing on one? In how many of the chambers of the other state legislatures have there been hearings on mRNA legislation and some version of it was passed out of committee?
Replies: @Curle
As of March 12, 2025, there is no evidence that the Washington State Legislature has scheduled hearings on any bills aiming to ban or restrict mRNA vaccines. A review of the legislature’s committee schedules and agendas does not indicate any such hearings. 
In other states, several legislative bodies have considered bills related to mRNA vaccines:
• Montana: House Bill 371, which proposed banning mRNA vaccines, passed out of the House Judiciary Committee on February 12, 2025, with a 12-8 vote.  However, the full House voted down the bill on February 19, 2025. 
• Iowa: Legislation was introduced to criminalize healthcare professionals administering mRNA vaccines. A subcommittee held a public hearing on March 3, 2025, but the bill faced significant opposition and did not advance. 
• Kentucky, Montana, and Idaho: These states have introduced bills to ban mRNA vaccines, with some passing out of committee. 
It’s important to note that while some state legislatures have considered such bills, none have been enacted into law as of this date.
�
I really don't think that's correct. For example, just after WWII, Russell supposedly even advocated possible American use of nuclear weapons against the USSR in order to ensure American world hegemony.
Russell was a communist pretending to be a benign socialist communism without Stalin’s horror show.
�
NO Far Leftist organisation regarded Russell as a Marxist. ALL of his writings were testimony to that truth. He was an aristocrat who wrote with great affection of the advantages for society of the advances in thought permitted by the aristocratic way of life.
You’re right about Russell’s post war advocacy of use of nuclear weapons against the USSR in certain definite circumstances. This again proves that claims that he was a ‘communist’ are pure nonsense, typically, though not exclusively, found among ‘rightist’ Americans with (second time) farcical recapitulation (Marx) of similar ‘thought’ today.
Actually Russell explicitly broke from all brands of communism in the 20’s after his visit to Soviet (!!!) Russia, though this was written much later at the height of the McCarthyite hysteria (the direction some of which was quite justified).
https://scrapsfromtheloft.com/philosophy/bertrand-russell-why-i-am-not-a-communist/
His work in the CND was consistent with his active Great War pacifism.
In general, slack use of categories makes a nonsense of logic.
Franklin County has a population of 99k making it the 14th largest county in the state of Washington. Putting things in perspective, Benton County has a population equal to 4% of the state’s largest county, King County, 10% of the state’s second largest County, Pierce County and 1.2% of the state’s population. And Franklin County uses ordinances not resolutions when adopting permanent laws. In other words, whatever the merits this resolution was a mouse farting.
https://i.imgur.com/DjZM88W.jpegReplies: @Curle, @Truth Vigilante
In other words, whatever the merits this resolution was a mouse farting.
�
RFK would have forgotten more about vaccines and infectious diseases than you’ll EVER know cretin. Are you angling for a BigPharma pay cheque?
Russell was a GIANT of the 20th century, and you are a nassty, insignificant, insect. And an utterly brainwashed hard Right moron.
By the way, the “measles’ epidemic was a fake, totally created by the MSM. The child who they pretend died in Texas never died from measles as confirmed by his family.
Here is it:
Dr. Henry Ealy Says Texas Dept. Of Health Services Source Told Him Child Was Not Admitted For Measles And Family Has Confirmed “…The Child Did Not Die From Measles.”
https://celiafarber.substack.com/p/dr-henry-ealy-says-texas-dept-of
Much has been reported about a) a child dying of measles in Texas (‘see? it’s a deadly disease’), and b) RFK Jr’s reaction to that, apparently advocating the measles vaccine in response to the pressure .
It tells us two things:
1/ Big pharma, the deep state (whatever you want to call these criminals) and their media will invent anything to advance their goals , as seen during covid.
2/ RFK Jr. didn’t take long to submit to the pressure. Is he really the man he pretends to be?
How is he going to succeed in his MAHA role if he gives up so easily on the first attack?
Trump got trapped many times during his first tenure, swimming among cockroaches, snakes, vultures, hyenas, is not for the feint hearted.
I wish him luck, but if a man sticks to his principles, he can always be killed, removed from his post but he can never fail.
Click on the short video clip at the bottom of this X post to hear the chilling things Dr Chris Shoemaker has to say about the “safe and effective†jabs…
https://twitter.com/sensereceptor/status/1898954186852532230?s=46
Telegram comment posted by Dr Roger Hodkinson:
American virologist Dr. Robert R. Redfield, who served as the director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) during the pandemic, has admitted that reports of “so-called Long Covid†are actually a cover-up for global surges of “mRNA vaccine injury.â€
Redfield made the explosive admission during a new interview with the MAHA Initiative podcast.
https://slaynews.com/news/ex-cdc-director-long-covid-mrna-vaccine-injury/
Join 👉 https://t.me/RogerHodkinson
Animal rights and concern are big deal everywhere. Woe to you if you ward off a stray dog that threatens you too forcefully. Such as one instinctively protecting its new litter. The bleeding hearts feeding the strays also cause various wild animals to congregate.
The assertion that AZT caused AIDS was fabricated by Peter Duesberg when his recreational drug use causing AIDS hypothesis fell through. He makes out his case for this in Chapter nine of Inventing the AIDS Virus, where he cites the cases of three well-known Americans: Kimberley Bergalis, Alison Gertz and Arthur Ashe.
Really not sure what you’re trying to say. Is it, “No one knew Fauci poisioned these people with deadly AZT that gave them AIDS†?
That’s polemic, hyperbole, an assertion. It’s not fact.
�
In reality, the “brief pneumonia†she was hospitalised for was PCP. Her T cell count at the time (before starting AZT) was 43. And she wasn’t tested for HIV “out of the blue†- she was tested because she had an otherwise unexplained AIDS-defining opportunistic infection.
The story picks up again in May 1989, when Bergalis developed a transient oral yeast infection. Later that year, during the emotional stress of preparing for an actuarial exam for the state of Florida, she felt some ongoing nausea, and she became dizzy during the test itself. Afterward, the symptoms disappeared. But a brief pneumonia that December sent her to hospital, where the doctor decided out of the blue to test her for HIV. As chance would have it, she had antibodies against the virus.
Up to this point, none of her occasional diseases differed from the common health problems many HIV-negative people encounter.
[…] So Bergalis was prescribed AZT. […] and by late 1990 her T cell count had dropped from the average of 1,000 to a mere 43.
�
The “covid” jab is the new AIDS. There is no harm it has not produced: death, disease or infirmity. Time to move on to this new atrocity.
In modern life, poisoning (of blood, etc.) works in many ways. One way is the intestines getting undermined to be too porous; this is a major route for (a) plastic particles (b) proteins not taken apart into amino acids.
Disease transmission through pathogen is another matter that remains unproven, contrary to all the dogma.
Big payments up front, but most of the “treated” cattle die too fast or run out of money. Better to bleed them at a slowly as in obesity, diabetes, BP, cholesterol, heart, joint diseases, etc.
The skins whether thick or thin are almost all coated with agro-chemicals and even plastic. Good luck.
Ron, you didn't need to read the 'Turtles' book to know this.
Turtles summarizes this outrageous situation by stating that each year tens of millions of vaccine doses are administered to infants and toddlers in America, and not a single one of them has ever been tested in clinical trials against an inert placebo.
�
Neuro-developmental disorder, autism spectrum disorder, ADHD and learning disability have a nice vague ring, compared to mentally damaged. But there is no such danger if the newborn dies of “SIDS” from the first few jabs.
Mullis asked Montagner in person to identify the research that proved the existence of any virus. After some hot air, the latter crossed the room to evade the issue.
Recently, Ron Unz mentioned 2 people who had been awarded the “Nobel” prize in Economics from Norway for 2024. They had written that China was close to economic collapse. Let us be more sensible in assessing all international awards.
The aborigine writes his drivel; commenting well over 21000 times. It is readily apparent you don’t have a job and little education–21000 comments–get a job you lazy schmuck and concern yourself with your own tribe.
The anti vaccine crusader is now very concerned about the measles outbreak and 2 deaths so far in the southwest. Facing reality as director of NHS who’s the tort lawyer gonna sue now?
RFKjr is a corrupt Demorat lawyer, looking for his next lawsuit. Why is it a surprise that he supports the abortion industry and claims he is concerned about America’s health? Recall, he took a family vacation with Epstein, the guy that made millions pimping young GENTILE girls for profit. What a disgusting pair they are.
RFKjr has been a democrat lawyer for what 45 years, and has no business heading up HHS–he is also adamantly opposed to vaccination, a universal preventive of infectious diseases that have saved a billion lives around the world. Even his own party rejected him because of his stupidity and blatant dishonesty.
You’re a pustule of race hatred yourself
Chomsky, American version of Bertrand Russell Lord Buttinsky. Only uglier shabbier and far more obnoxious. And the fake science he invented linguistics. Sounds like Kabala count letters and words in the Bible until you go insane.
I really don't think that's correct. For example, just after WWII, Russell supposedly even advocated possible American use of nuclear weapons against the USSR in order to ensure American world hegemony.
Russell was a communist pretending to be a benign socialist communism without Stalin’s horror show.
�
Okay, fine what else can I call Russell? Lord Buttinsky? Pretentious pompous holier than thou aristocrat bringing his great wisdom to us ignorant dumb proles?
Show off?
Except for his Nuclear Disarmament crusade. A Soviet front group. Nuclear Disarmament for every country in the world but Russia. Like communist woke progressive Americans pro gun control too ignorant and stupid to know that criminals don’t buy and register their guns at licensed stores. But steal their guns or buy them from thieves.
If he were alive today he’d be on the channel beaches welcoming and slobbering over the African and Muslim invaders. He’d buy a fleet of Greyhound size buses to transport the thugs to their hotels with a welfare office in the lobby. And rent a nearby building to provide them with new clothes phones razors video games whatever else they wanted for free of course. All paid by the taxpayers via government grants.
Depending on what you mean by "debilitating", debilitating levels of autism in general aren't required for someone to qualify for a diagnosis (yes, the diagnosis has been watered down that much) and many do not fullfil the criteria for the diagnosis later on in life.
California, also state with highest percent of certifiable autistics (those with debilitating levels).
�
By that reasoning, autism shouldn't exist at all among Black Americans or Asians. State figures show the opposite. Also, there are no "wonky" genes. Either, the genetic input is so strong that it disrupts metabolism independently of environmental factors (like in Down's syndrome or Tay-Sachs) or it doesn't (as in various genes that predispose someone to heart disease or allergic shocks)
This is mostly a problem driven by Europeans who have wonky Neanderthal DNA which becomes wonkier when mixed with non-Europeans
�
State facilities usually cater to all developmentally/intellectually disabled people, which, as everyone knows, suffer from an extreme diverse array of issues.
I asked her how many of the couples at his state facility are interracial to some degree...
�
Autism, like ADHD, anxiety etc. is a big cashcow and schools are financially incentivized to put as many kids as possible on IEPs (up to 50 % of all students are on them) or in special needs classes.
I asked the gal who heads up the autistic kid program at the nearby school. Same answer.
�
It's also the poorest state, hence the state that is the most likely to be incapable to financially support the ponzi scheme.Replies: @Curle, @Curle
What is state with lowest autism percentage? West Virginia.
�
(Continued)
In addition to these findings, the study discovered genetic markers linked to autism in different ethnic groups. For example, the Neanderthal DNA marker in the SLC37A1 gene was associated with autism and epilepsy in white non-Hispanic individuals. Despite these associations, the researchers emphasize that autistic individuals do not carry more Neanderthal DNA overall compared to non-autistic individuals. Instead, a subset of Neanderthal-derived genetic variations is more prevalent in people with autism and their families.
Depending on what you mean by "debilitating", debilitating levels of autism in general aren't required for someone to qualify for a diagnosis (yes, the diagnosis has been watered down that much) and many do not fullfil the criteria for the diagnosis later on in life.
California, also state with highest percent of certifiable autistics (those with debilitating levels).
�
By that reasoning, autism shouldn't exist at all among Black Americans or Asians. State figures show the opposite. Also, there are no "wonky" genes. Either, the genetic input is so strong that it disrupts metabolism independently of environmental factors (like in Down's syndrome or Tay-Sachs) or it doesn't (as in various genes that predispose someone to heart disease or allergic shocks)
This is mostly a problem driven by Europeans who have wonky Neanderthal DNA which becomes wonkier when mixed with non-Europeans
�
State facilities usually cater to all developmentally/intellectually disabled people, which, as everyone knows, suffer from an extreme diverse array of issues.
I asked her how many of the couples at his state facility are interracial to some degree...
�
Autism, like ADHD, anxiety etc. is a big cashcow and schools are financially incentivized to put as many kids as possible on IEPs (up to 50 % of all students are on them) or in special needs classes.
I asked the gal who heads up the autistic kid program at the nearby school. Same answer.
�
It's also the poorest state, hence the state that is the most likely to be incapable to financially support the ponzi scheme.Replies: @Curle, @Curle
What is state with lowest autism percentage? West Virginia.
�
This really is unsubstantiated and extremely poor theorizing.
A landmark study recently published in the prestigious science journal Nature: Molecular Psychiatry has unveiled a new discovery in autism research. The research is the first to show that certain genetic traits inherited from Neanderthals play a significant role in autism. Dr. Emily Casanova, assistant professor of neuroscience at Loyola University New Orleans, co-authored this pioneering work alongside her esteemed colleagues at Clemson University.
The influence of genes has been discussed by geneticists and medical researchers for a decade. Couldn’t you do even a cursory search before making a fool of yourself? If you want to dig in further search for inter-racial differentials compared to non-interracial. I’ve done it and interracial mixing is a big multiplier of preponderance. Surely you don’t rely on people in the internet to do your searching for you?
https://www.loyno.edu/news/jun-07-2024_groundbreaking-study-unveils-role-neanderthal-genes-autism
Click on the following link headlined ‘Why I outed Chomsky – Kevin Barrett’:
https://kevinbarrett.heresycentral.is/2013/11/why-i-outed-chomsky/
Are you aware also that Chomsky opposes BDS? He’s gone out of his way to condemn it.
Who, other than the foot soldiers of ZOG, could possibly oppose BDS?
Russell was a communist pretending to be a benign socialist communism without Stalin’s horror show.
I really don’t think that’s correct. For example, just after WWII, Russell supposedly even advocated possible American use of nuclear weapons against the USSR in order to ensure American world hegemony.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bertrand_Russell
Obviously, Wikipedia is hardly the most reliable source, but I’ve often heard that over the years and it provides a link to the source.
I very much doubt that any “Communists” publicly supported American nuclear attacks against Stalin’s regime in those years (except maybe for some extreme Trotskyites).
Ron, have you seen this? https://twitter.com/SecKennedy/status/1896722453189034130
Russell was a communist pretending to be a benign socialist communism without Stalin’s horror show. Nuclear Disarmament for America and Europe but not for Russia. Nuclear Disarmament was a very obvious Soviet front group. To convince Europe and America to get rid of nuclear weapons while Russia kept theirs and built more.
Nobel prize Obama got a noble prize for nothing except being black. Russell got his Nobel prize for his not very well disguised communist propaganda
You’re incredibly naive if you believe Russsell’s Nuclear Disarmament was anything but Soviet subversion of Europe’s reasonable defense against Soviet aggression.
I really don't think that's correct. For example, just after WWII, Russell supposedly even advocated possible American use of nuclear weapons against the USSR in order to ensure American world hegemony.
Russell was a communist pretending to be a benign socialist communism without Stalin’s horror show.
�
Russell was firmly anti-communist. He was, moreover, one of the greatest philosophers of the 20th century, with contributions in numerous fields, particularly logic. He was also a Nobel Prize winner for Literature, a public intellectual of note, a leader of the the nuclear disarmament movement and much more besides.
In contrast, you are a morally poisonous, moronic, pig ignorant, brainwashed Yankee blatherskite. And Oswald was pure CIA, you dolt.
The anti vaccine crusader is now very concerned about the measles outbreak and 2 deaths so far in the southwest. Facing reality as director of NHS who’s the tort lawyer gonna sue now?
RFKjr is a corrupt Demorat lawyer, looking for his next lawsuit. Why is it a surprise that he supports the abortion industry and claims he is concerned about America's health? Recall, he took a family vacation with Epstein, the guy that made millions pimping young GENTILE girls for profit. What a disgusting pair they are.
The anti vaccine crusader is now very concerned about the measles outbreak and 2 deaths so far in the southwest. Facing reality as director of NHS who’s the tort lawyer gonna sue now?
�
No I didn't. He was never going to make the grade as a righteous Jew.
You forgot Chomsky
�
Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
Summary: Chomsky has been a tool of the establishment for decades and very likely a CIA asset. To the extent he voices any opposition in recent times (and it's bugger all as far I've seen), it's been in the capacity of Controlled Opposition.
Same goes for Bernie Sanders - who I knew from Day One was a worthless piece of shit.
Contrast him with someone like Dr Ron Paul - who NEVER wavered, never backed down under pressure from ZOG, always stuck to his positions consistently since the 1970's (positions that ALL proved to be 100% right).
�
Chomsky realises that the Zionazi involvement in 9/11 raises the prospect of utter horror for US Jews and goyim, if revealed. Ditto, JFK, perhaps. His hero, Russell, spotted the Warren farce as a joke immediately, at 92 years old.
As for the rest, he has done so much work exposing US crimes that he must be the deepest buried ‘mole’ ever. And Boynie is an utter cunt, fraud, and stooge of the Democratic leadership. He’s NOTHING like Chomsky.
You’re a pustule of race hatred, and I’m, thankfully, not. Move to Ausfailia-your type are on the ascendant, in the brief time we have left.
Unzip.com urged vaccinations and numerous booster shots …
I don’t think this is the hyperlink you intended to attach.
Replies: @Alden
Professor Ian Brighthope breaks down in tears in front of thousands in Perth as he realises that 60 million contaminated vaccines have been administered to innocent Australians now causing death and turbo cancer.
Join 👉 https://t.me/RogerHodkinson
https://t.me/RogerHodkinson/3494
�
From February 2020 unz.com claimed covid hoax was worse than the bubonic plague or smallpox. Tens of millions would die. Unzip.com urged vaccinations and numerous booster shots masking isolating 6 feet distance praised closing down the entire economy and urged everyone to follow all of Fauci’s mandates.
Then a lawyer no medical experience or training with the magic name Kennedy formed his anti vaccine grift NGO unz.com is suddenly against all vaccines and modern medicine.
I never never believed that covid hoax was anything but seasonal flu. I always believed that covid hoax was just another version of TSA. A totalitarian way of testing how much Americans can tolerate without rebelling.
Autism does not exist. It’s another silly fad by rich women. It’s a way for rich whites who refuse to acknowledge racial discrimination against Whites to get their children into top tier colleges. College admission is based on race sex and the poor poor pitiful me essay I may be White but I’m autistic gay transgender therefore I deserve admission.
I don’t think this is the hyperlink you intended to attach.
Unzip.com urged vaccinations and numerous booster shots …
�
I find it ridiculous to claim that military enlistees are a "highly selected group of teenagers." My impression was that HIV tests on that population were probably the largest scale and least selective such samples in American society, therefore the most likely to provide indications of HIV infections in the general American population. What broader and less selective national samples do you have supporting your 75/25 HIV-positive gender ratio?
you cannot extrapolate from a highly selected group of teenagers to the US population as a whole. The male-female ratio of HIV in the US as a whole is not 50/50 – it’s roughly 75/25.
�
I find it very doubtful that the supposed pattern of "opportunistic infections" among the different categories of AIDS victims seems so discordant. According to the published claims of Duesberg and his scientific allies, the typical symptoms of "AIDS" among the various different high-prevalence populations (e.g. gay men, IV drug users, hemophiliacs, Haitians, Africans in Africa) were quite different. I find this extremely suspicious.
AIDS is a disease of the immune system, which leaves sufferers vulnerable to a range of opportunistic infections. Which particular opportunistic infections you get depends on what is already around in your body or your environment.
�
According to Wikipedia, the rate of HIV positivity among pregnant women in South Africa rose from 0.8% in 1990 to 4.3% in 1993 to 24.5% in 2000.
Where did you get “hundreds of millions†from? The estimated prevalence of HIV in subsaharan Africa is around 25 to 27 million, or around 2-2.5% of the overall population. Around 80% now have access to antiretrovirals. Most Africans live in cities and towns, not rural areas. And most Africans live in countries not affected by civil wars.
�
I would kindly recommend Peter Duesberg’s interview from 2013. when Joe Rogan had a guest that controversial, but no mega influential like today to be victim of censorship from today’s guardians of scientific truth.
Thanks to Mr Unz for this window of freedom !
Telegram comment posted by Dr Roger Hodkinson:
Professor Ian Brighthope breaks down in tears in front of thousands in Perth as he realises that 60 million contaminated vaccines have been administered to innocent Australians now causing death and turbo cancer.
Join 👉 https://t.me/RogerHodkinson
You are an aborigine and I am European American. It is readily apparent you don’t have a job and little education–21000 comments–get a job you lazy schmuck and concern yourself with your own tribe.
Just as you say, AIDS deaths skyrocketed after the introduction of AZT, leading to obvious questions regarding cause and effect.
By the end of 1986 (prior to the introduction of AZT) There had been 15,527 cumulative cases of AIDS reported in the US, of whom 12,529 had died.
By the end of 1989 117,508 cumulative cases of AIDS had been reported, of whom 89,343 had died...
AZT, which was only approved for treatment after a diagnosis of AIDS or ARC during the latter part of that decade.
�
Ron, this is off topic, but something I believe you’ll find interesting.
I find it ridiculous to claim that military enlistees are a "highly selected group of teenagers." My impression was that HIV tests on that population were probably the largest scale and least selective such samples in American society, therefore the most likely to provide indications of HIV infections in the general American population. What broader and less selective national samples do you have supporting your 75/25 HIV-positive gender ratio?
you cannot extrapolate from a highly selected group of teenagers to the US population as a whole. The male-female ratio of HIV in the US as a whole is not 50/50 – it’s roughly 75/25.
�
I find it very doubtful that the supposed pattern of "opportunistic infections" among the different categories of AIDS victims seems so discordant. According to the published claims of Duesberg and his scientific allies, the typical symptoms of "AIDS" among the various different high-prevalence populations (e.g. gay men, IV drug users, hemophiliacs, Haitians, Africans in Africa) were quite different. I find this extremely suspicious.
AIDS is a disease of the immune system, which leaves sufferers vulnerable to a range of opportunistic infections. Which particular opportunistic infections you get depends on what is already around in your body or your environment.
�
According to Wikipedia, the rate of HIV positivity among pregnant women in South Africa rose from 0.8% in 1990 to 4.3% in 1993 to 24.5% in 2000.
Where did you get “hundreds of millions†from? The estimated prevalence of HIV in subsaharan Africa is around 25 to 27 million, or around 2-2.5% of the overall population. Around 80% now have access to antiretrovirals. Most Africans live in cities and towns, not rural areas. And most Africans live in countries not affected by civil wars.
�
I find it ridiculous to claim that military enlistees are a “highly selected group of teenagers.†My impression was that HIV tests on that population were probably the largest scale and least selective such samples in American society, therefore the most likely to provide indications of HIV infections in the general American population.
I don’t know how I can explain it more simply. The majority of US males with HIV were infected through gay sex or injecting drug use. The majority of US females have been infected through heterosexual sex. The US military in the 1980s excluded most males in HIV risk groups as a matter of policy, but did not exclude the majority of females at risk. This skews the male/female ratio in this sample relative to the population as whole.
What broader and less selective national samples do you have supporting your 75/25 HIV-positive gender ratio?
HIV infection is a notifiable disease in the US. All new cases in the entire country are reported to the CDC each year, and these statistics are published annually. The male/female ratio is always 75/25, give or take a few per cent. There is no large hidden epidemic in women: if there were this would show up in the millions of low risk women are screened each year through blood donations, antenatal screening or military applicants. In the study in question, for example, they found only 48 HIV positive girls among 150,043 applicants – a rate considerably lower than known cases among US women.
I find it very doubtful that the supposed pattern of “opportunistic infections†among the different categories of AIDS victims seems so discordant. According to the published claims of Duesberg and his scientific allies, the typical symptoms of “AIDS†among the various different high-prevalence populations (e.g. gay men, IV drug users, hemophiliacs, Haitians, Africans in Africa) were quite different. I find this extremely suspicious.
https://www.unz.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/duesberg-koehnlein-rasnick.pdf
I presume you’re referring to Table 2 in that paper. It’s nonsense. Duesberg et al claim that Kaposi’s is rare in Africa – it’s not, and its incidence closely follows the local prevalence of HHV8. They claim that lymphoma is rare in IDUs, children, transfusion recipients, etc. It’s not: it’s the commonest cancer in all these groups. They claim TB is a “highly representative” OI in US children. It’s not. Bacterial pneumonia is common in all AIDS risk groups, as are wasting and dementia. I don’t know why they think transfusion recipients don’t get these.
Most of the common AIDS defining illnesses are common to all risk groups. The exceptions are opportunistic infections where the prevalence of the causative organism varies widely by geography or social group. You have to carry or be exposed to the causative organism before you can develop the relevant opportunistic disease. For example, most Americans have never been exposed to TB, so TB is a relatively rare OI in Americans with AIDS. However many if not most Africans have been exposed, and carry the bug as a latent infection. Most Americans have never been exposed to HHV8, so they don’t carry the bug and therefore won’t get KS if they get immunosuppressed. However it’s common as a latent infection in gay men, so if they develop AIDS then KS can be one of the manifestations.
According to Wikipedia, the rate of HIV positivity among pregnant women in South Africa rose from 0.8% in 1990 to 4.3% in 1993 to 24.5% in 2000.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HIV/AIDS_in_South_Africa#Demographics
This suggests the dramatic speed with which HIV would spread within African populations. South Africa has the most solid public health statistics in Sub-Saharan Africa, so I’d expect that similar exponential growth had been occurring in many other African countries, but with much less visibility. Can you explain to me why you don’t think this had happened?
There are 54 countries in Africa, each with different cultures, histories and economic conditions. Why should the HIV epidemic in each follow exactly the same trajectory as in South Africa? You seem to be suggesting that there are “hundreds of millions” of HIV infections that no one has noticed. Where, exactly do you think these infections have occurred?
And do you seriously believe that Africans in all these disorganized countries, suffering from civil wars, famines, and urban chaos, are carefully taking their daily doses of HIV drugs? If not, why haven’t millions or even tens of millions of them died of AIDS over the last 20-odd years?
What do you think they are doing with the HIV drugs that have been distributed to them? Of course they take them. And yes, millions have, in fact, died in the past 20 years. In 2005 the rate was around 2 million a year. But with the rollout of antiretrovirals this figure has been cut to around 300,000 to 400,000 annually.
I remember back in the late 1980s or early 1990s there was a popular fictional novel describing an African continent largely depopulated due to AIDS by the early 2000s, a scenario that seemed at least conceivable at the time. But despite the apparent exponential spread of HIV infections, absolutely none of those dire predictions came to pass.
Even at its worst in 2005, deaths from HIV/AIDS were around 2 million, deaths from other causes around 11 million, and births around 37 million for a net gain of 24 million people (leaving aside migrations). For Africa’s population to go backwards due to HIV/AIDS deaths there would have to be ten times as many such deaths as there actually were, even at its worst.
And yet again, we come full circle here. If you’re such a self-styled expert on the event after so long, why can’t you do a better job of convincing somebody of your position?
The circles are all in the mosh pit of your mind, as I’ve articulated my position on the assassination quite unambiguously and without any difficulty.
Lee Harvey Oswald didn’t kill either Pres. Kennedy or Officer Tippit on Nov. 22, 1963.
With LBJ as the ringleader, rogue elements of the U.S. Government and MIC joined forces with some underworld hoods to assassinate Pres. Kennedy, and pin the crime on patsy Lee Harvey Oswald.
You have yourself to thank for your ‘service’ It became obvious to me even as a teenager before Iraq what type of idiot signs up to put a uniform on for this corrupt government. So suck on that, ‘slick’
After high school, I was happy enough to enlist in the Air Force to escape some bad friends and an uncertain future working a menial job after a less-than-ideal upbringing led to disinterest in my studies during high school. However, like most of my pals, I was fervently anti-communist at the time, although it is true that most of my perceptions and politics had been shaped by Hollywood, TV and comic books.
Nevertheless, I did listen to the news, and read the newspapers sporadically enough to know about the self-immolation of the Buddhist monk in the Summer of ’63, and that Adlai Stevenson had been roughed up by a mob of Right-wingers in Dallas just a couple of weeks before Pres. Kennedy’s planned trip to the Texas city. More than a few of JFK’s advisors urged him to skip or cancel the trip.
Yes, I was the proverbial rube from Podunk when I enlisted at 17, naive and gullible enough to believe what the recruiter had told me and I would get the basic electronics training I sought as a great foundation for my planned pursuit of an Electrical Engineering degree on the GI Bill after my 4-year enlistment.
Unfortunately, Uncle Sam had other ideas for me, but at least I didn’t have to go to Vietnam, and instead got sent to college to study Russian.
I did have quite a few rather colorful experiences during my time in the Air Force, and I am definitely proud to have served honorably, which is amplified by my knowledge that we didn’t go to war with the Soviet Union nor did any of my fellow airman get killed or injured on my watch.
You forgot Chomsky
No I didn’t. He was never going to make the grade as a righteous Jew.
He might have said a few sensible things decades ago, but since the turn of the century he’s been next to worthless.
He wouldn’t take a position on 9/11, but when pressed he said: ‘It’s not important who was behind it, in the event it was a conspiracy not in accord with the official U.S Gubmint narrative’.
Think about that for one second. This False Flag was the most egregious crime of the 21st century and Chomsky says ‘Not Important’.
If that wasn’t enough, watch the 2 mins of the video below from 1:40-3:20, and hear what Chomsky has to say about the unvaxxed during the Covid Psyop:
Summary: Chomsky has been a tool of the establishment for decades and very likely a CIA asset. To the extent he voices any opposition in recent times (and it’s bugger all as far I’ve seen), it’s been in the capacity of Controlled Opposition.
Same goes for Bernie Sanders – who I knew from Day One was a worthless piece of shit.
Contrast him with someone like Dr Ron Paul – who NEVER wavered, never backed down under pressure from ZOG, always stuck to his positions consistently since the 1970’s (positions that ALL proved to be 100% right).
Just as you say, AIDS deaths skyrocketed after the introduction of AZT, leading to obvious questions regarding cause and effect.
By the end of 1986 (prior to the introduction of AZT) There had been 15,527 cumulative cases of AIDS reported in the US, of whom 12,529 had died.
By the end of 1989 117,508 cumulative cases of AIDS had been reported, of whom 89,343 had died...
AZT, which was only approved for treatment after a diagnosis of AIDS or ARC during the latter part of that decade.
�
You claim that AZT treatment was not based upon HIV-positive status but only for individuals who had already exhibited serious symptoms of the developing AIDS disease itself. This is exactly contrary to the claims made at considerable length made by Duesberg and Kennedy, and I’d welcome solid evidence to that effect.
My claim is that during the 1980s (1987 to early 1990) AZT was approved for the treatment of AIDS and ARC, and not for asymptomatic HIV infection. The claims “made at considerable length” by Duesberg and Kennedy are false. The history is as follows:
On 20th March 1987 Zidovudine (AZT) was FDA approved for the treatment of AIDS. Eligibility was based on having had PCP and/or a CD4 count below 200. The approved dose was 200 mg every 4 hours (1000-1200 mg daily). [1]
Two months later the indication was extended to patients with other AIDS-defining opportunistic infections and symptomatic AIDS-related complex. [2]
On 16th January 1990 the FDA halved the approved dose to 500-600 mg daily. [3]
On 2nd March 1990 the FDA expanded the indication to make AZT available to patients with early (asymptomatic) HIV if their CD4 count was below 500. This was controversial: while there was evidence from placebo controlled trials that AZT delayed the onset of AIDS in the first year, there was no clear evidence that long term survival with early treatment was superior to waiting until the onset of AIDS or ARC. [4]
In June 1993 preliminary results from the Concorde study in the UK and France showed there was no survival advantage with early treatment compared to late, and treatment guidelines were subsequently modified. [5]
Just as you say, AIDS deaths skyrocketed after the introduction of AZT, leading to obvious questions regarding cause and effect.
Average and median survival time with AIDS increased after AZT treatment was introduced in 1987. This is not consistent with AZT shortening lives of people with AIDS. [6] Death numbers among people with AIDS increased because there were more and more people diagnosed with the disease each year.
[1] https://www.wellesu.com/10.1038/326430b0
[2] https://www.wellesu.com/10.1001/jama.1987.03400110099035
[3] https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1990-01-16-mn-316-story.html
[4] https://www.wellesu.com/10.1001/jama.1990.03440120013001
[5] https://sci-hub.se/10.1136/bmj.306.6893.1631
[6] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2392071/
Russell was a communist just as Oswald was…Of course Russell denied that a fellow communist murdered Kennedy
Bertrand Russell was a supporter of Communism around the time of the Bolshevik Revolution, as were many intellectuals of the period, but he became disillusioned after a visit to the Soviet Union in 1920 where he met with Lenin, and became even more so during Stalin’s dictatorship, whom he accused of running a “vast slave camp.” He eventually denounced Marx as “muddle-headed” and the ideology of Communism as “a doctrine bred of poverty, hatred and strife.”
Â
http://eternalvigilance.nz/2013/04/why-i-am-not-a-communistby-bertrand-russell/
His objection to the Oswald-as-lone-assassin theory is pretty much the standard stuff: inadequacies of the Warren Commission, questionable forensic evidence, the peculiarities of Oswald’s and Ruby’s backgrounds, etc.
http://22november1963.org.uk/bertrand-russell-16-questions-on-the-assassination
Look Slick. I've been a student of the assassination since Nov. 22, 1963, when I was a senior in high school. You don't tell me what to do. Got it?Few here have been on the case longer than I or know more about the case than I do, and in any event, you didn't and can't offer even a single rebuttal to any of my points irrespective of how long you claim you've been aware of them. As a sort of summary, I've merely recounted a few of the telling and unassailable facts about the events surrounding Nov. 22, 1963 distilled from - do the math - over 60 years of JFK assassination research. I was a highly regarded analyst and reporter during two tours of duty overseas in the late '60s and early '70s with Air Force Security Service. What's your background?Despite your delusions, I've never watched Stone's JFK movie in its entirety, or based any of my ideas on it, simply because I'd read most of Harold Weisberg's Whitewash series of self-published books by then, along with Rush to Judgment and many others, and I certainly wasn't going to let anything from Oliver Stone & Hollywood color or trump what I'd read from these authors.Replies: @Captain Jones
Every single thing you wrote I’ve been aware of for ... 40 years wouldn’t have been aware of what you wrote there? ...you don’t need to reiterate the same crap constantly.
�
And yet again, we come full circle here. If you’re such a self-styled expert on the event after so long, why can’t you do a better job of convincing somebody of your position?
I’d assume you’d be able to explain your convictions convincingly (using your own words, thought process, and your own logic) Instead you simply rehash word-for-word arguments that have been lifted straight out of some novel put out years ago by the JFK Conspiracy Industry Complex.
Which is a real thing by the way. You’d think intelligent people supposedly so keen on spotting conspiracies would spot the obvious one directly targeting them; the conspiracy to sell bullshit conspiracy theories to them.
How long until we have to be ‘informed’ yet gain about hidden snipers shooting through windshields and rife bullets that only travel an inch or so into a body? Because the doctor only probed with his pinky finger lets not forget!
Another thing anybody could care less about anymore is your ‘service’ All because you signed up to turn yourself literally into property of the US government. And in turn you served the corrupt US government, you didn’t serve for the common citizen or anything legitimate whatsoever. And many who didn’t sign up, burned their draft cards (just like they avoided the wonderful vaccine courtesy of the same corrupt government years after the fact)
You have yourself to thank for your ‘service’ It became obvious to me even as a teenager before Iraq what type of idiot signs up to put a uniform on for this corrupt government. So suck on that, ‘slick’
The circles are all in the mosh pit of your mind, as I've articulated my position on the assassination quite unambiguously and without any difficulty.Lee Harvey Oswald didn't kill either Pres. Kennedy or Officer Tippit on Nov. 22, 1963. With LBJ as the ringleader, rogue elements of the U.S. Government and MIC joined forces with some underworld hoods to assassinate Pres. Kennedy, and pin the crime on patsy Lee Harvey Oswald.
And yet again, we come full circle here. If you’re such a self-styled expert on the event after so long, why can’t you do a better job of convincing somebody of your position?
�
You have yourself to thank for your ‘service’ It became obvious to me even as a teenager before Iraq what type of idiot signs up to put a uniform on for this corrupt government. So suck on that, ‘slick’After high school, I was happy enough to enlist in the Air Force to escape some bad friends and an uncertain future working a menial job after a less-than-ideal upbringing led to disinterest in my studies during high school. However, like most of my pals, I was fervently anti-communist at the time, although it is true that most of my perceptions and politics had been shaped by Hollywood, TV and comic books. Nevertheless, I did listen to the news, and read the newspapers sporadically enough to know about the self-immolation of the Buddhist monk in the Summer of '63, and that Adlai Stevenson had been roughed up by a mob of Right-wingers in Dallas just a couple of weeks before Pres. Kennedy's planned trip to the Texas city. More than a few of JFK's advisors urged him to skip or cancel the trip. Yes, I was the proverbial rube from Podunk when I enlisted at 17, naive and gullible enough to believe what the recruiter had told me and I would get the basic electronics training I sought as a great foundation for my planned pursuit of an Electrical Engineering degree on the GI Bill after my 4-year enlistment. Unfortunately, Uncle Sam had other ideas for me, but at least I didn't have to go to Vietnam, and instead got sent to college to study Russian.I did have quite a few rather colorful experiences during my time in the Air Force, and I am definitely proud to have served honorably, which is amplified by my knowledge that we didn't go to war with the Soviet Union nor did any of my fellow airman get killed or injured on my watch.
�
Every single thing you wrote I’ve been aware of for … 40 years wouldn’t have been aware of what you wrote there? …you don’t need to reiterate the same crap constantly.
Look Slick. I’ve been a student of the assassination since Nov. 22, 1963, when I was a senior in high school. You don’t tell me what to do. Got it?
Few here have been on the case longer than I or know more about the case than I do, and in any event, you didn’t and can’t offer even a single rebuttal to any of my points irrespective of how long you claim you’ve been aware of them.
As a sort of summary, I’ve merely recounted a few of the telling and unassailable facts about the events surrounding Nov. 22, 1963 distilled from – do the math – over 60 years of JFK assassination research.
I was a highly regarded analyst and reporter during two tours of duty overseas in the late ’60s and early ’70s with Air Force Security Service. What’s your background?
Despite your delusions, I’ve never watched Stone’s JFK movie in its entirety, or based any of my ideas on it, simply because I’d read most of Harold Weisberg’s Whitewash series of self-published books by then, along with Rush to Judgment and many others, and I certainly wasn’t going to let anything from Oliver Stone & Hollywood color or trump what I’d read from these authors.
The backyard photos are obvious fakes, which is easy to discern for knowledgeable image analysts who note that Oswald's face is identical in all three of the backyard pics, which is an impossible result with a hand-held camera and a live subject, and is therefore a sure sign of a paste-up, just as Oswald exclaimed when shown the picture by Will Fritz.
It was photo heavy and featured the ‘backyard’ photo of Oswald with the rifle...So next to your typical American I’m way beyond in knowledge of the subject.
�
Every single thing you wrote I’ve been aware of for years (decades over decades) You actually think somebody who has had an interest in it for 40 years wouldn’t have been aware of what you wrote there?
Seems just substitute any and all original thought with straight up memorized ‘gotcha’ points out of Stone’s JFK from ’91 as some kind of legitimate argument strategy. It’s lazy and unoriginal (the conspiracy points are well established) you don’t need to reiterate the same crap constantly.
Look Slick. I've been a student of the assassination since Nov. 22, 1963, when I was a senior in high school. You don't tell me what to do. Got it?Few here have been on the case longer than I or know more about the case than I do, and in any event, you didn't and can't offer even a single rebuttal to any of my points irrespective of how long you claim you've been aware of them. As a sort of summary, I've merely recounted a few of the telling and unassailable facts about the events surrounding Nov. 22, 1963 distilled from - do the math - over 60 years of JFK assassination research. I was a highly regarded analyst and reporter during two tours of duty overseas in the late '60s and early '70s with Air Force Security Service. What's your background?Despite your delusions, I've never watched Stone's JFK movie in its entirety, or based any of my ideas on it, simply because I'd read most of Harold Weisberg's Whitewash series of self-published books by then, along with Rush to Judgment and many others, and I certainly wasn't going to let anything from Oliver Stone & Hollywood color or trump what I'd read from these authors.Replies: @Captain Jones
Every single thing you wrote I’ve been aware of for ... 40 years wouldn’t have been aware of what you wrote there? ...you don’t need to reiterate the same crap constantly.
�
It was photo heavy and featured the ‘backyard’ photo of Oswald with the rifle…So next to your typical American I’m way beyond in knowledge of the subject.
The backyard photos are obvious fakes, which is easy to discern for knowledgeable image analysts who note that Oswald’s face is identical in all three of the backyard pics, which is an impossible result with a hand-held camera and a live subject, and is therefore a sure sign of a paste-up, just as Oswald exclaimed when shown the picture by Will Fritz.
None of the so-called evidence linking Oswald to the Kennedy and Tippit murders can stand up to close scrutiny and critical analysis, but apologists for the WC carry on still with all this tainted hooey, as if a murderer with a revolver would really stop and eject the cartridges from the murder weapon at the scene of the crime, and anyway the timeline makes clear that Oswald was already in the Texas theater buying popcorn when Tippit was killed.
Nobody has ever been able to put Lee Harvey Oswald with a rifle in his hands on the 6th floor of the TSBD at the time JFK was shot, and in fact several witnesses saw him on the 2nd and 1st floors around the time of the assassination.
Oswald himself told Fritz that he was “out front with Bill Shelly” when the shots were fired, putting him exactly where many analysts think he was pictured in the famous Altgens 6 photo that was altered with Billy Lovelady’s face pasted over Oswald’s, another crude, clumsy and no doubt rushed cut ‘n’ paste job with the tools of the ’60s, but “doorway man” in Altgens 6 appears to be wearing the same distinctive, rumpled, plaid, brownish shirt, open in the front, that Oswald was wearing when arrested.
Image: US News & World Report
Russell was a communist just as Oswald was. One of the useful idiots who traveled to Russia in the 1930s Cane back and wrote many articles denying the famine the millions sent to the Gulag prison camps. Of course Russell denied that a fellow communist murdered Kennedy
Bertrand Russell was a supporter of Communism around the time of the Bolshevik Revolution, as were many intellectuals of the period, but he became disillusioned after a visit to the Soviet Union in 1920 where he met with Lenin, and became even more so during Stalin's dictatorship, whom he accused of running a "vast slave camp." He eventually denounced Marx as "muddle-headed" and the ideology of Communism as "a doctrine bred of poverty, hatred and strife."
Russell was a communist just as Oswald was...Of course Russell denied that a fellow communist murdered Kennedy
�
By the end of 1986 (prior to the introduction of AZT) There had been 15,527 cumulative cases of AIDS reported in the US, of whom 12,529 had died.
Regarding your point, it’s obvious that people were dying from immune system problems prior to the introduction of AZT. After all, that’s how “AIDS†had been discovered a few years earlier.
However, the key issue is the numbers. According to Duesberg and his allies, the deaths prior to AZT were in the hundreds or the thousands, but once AZT was introduced, they reached the hundreds of thousands.
�
By the end of 1986 (prior to the introduction of AZT) There had been 15,527 cumulative cases of AIDS reported in the US, of whom 12,529 had died.
By the end of 1989 117,508 cumulative cases of AIDS had been reported, of whom 89,343 had died…
AZT, which was only approved for treatment after a diagnosis of AIDS or ARC during the latter part of that decade.
Just as you say, AIDS deaths skyrocketed after the introduction of AZT, leading to obvious questions regarding cause and effect.
You claim that AZT treatment was not based upon HIV-positive status but only for individuals who had already exhibited serious symptoms of the developing AIDS disease itself. This is exactly contrary to the claims made at considerable length made by Duesberg and Kennedy, and I’d welcome solid evidence to that effect.
My claim is that during the 1980s (1987 to early 1990) AZT was approved for the treatment of AIDS and ARC, and not for asymptomatic HIV infection. The claims "made at considerable length" by Duesberg and Kennedy are false. The history is as follows:
You claim that AZT treatment was not based upon HIV-positive status but only for individuals who had already exhibited serious symptoms of the developing AIDS disease itself. This is exactly contrary to the claims made at considerable length made by Duesberg and Kennedy, and I’d welcome solid evidence to that effect.
�
Average and median survival time with AIDS increased after AZT treatment was introduced in 1987. This is not consistent with AZT shortening lives of people with AIDS. [6] Death numbers among people with AIDS increased because there were more and more people diagnosed with the disease each year.
Just as you say, AIDS deaths skyrocketed after the introduction of AZT, leading to obvious questions regarding cause and effect.
�
What is the point of asking questions if you simply ignore the answers? As I explained to you on the last thread on the subject, you cannot extrapolate from a highly selected group of teenagers to the US population as a whole. The male-female ratio of HIV in the US as a whole is not 50/50 - it's roughly 75/25. So is the male-female ratio of AIDS, and has been for decades. The majority of HIV infections in the US occur in sexually active gay men age 20-50. This group is obviously excluded from any group of teenage military applicants because (a) they're not teenagers and (b) gay males were actively discouraged from applying.
I have a couple of simple questions for you:
(1) Testing of military enlistees demonstrated that HIV infection rates in the general American population were equal between men and women, yet 90+% of those who actually came down with AIDS were male. If HIV causes AIDS, what explains that discrepancy?
�
AIDS is a disease of the immune system, which leaves sufferers vulnerable to a range of opportunistic infections. Which particular opportunistic infections you get depends on what is already around in your body or your environment. Pneumocystis is ubiquitous in the US and it's the commonest AIDS defining disease in all US groups - gay men, drug users, heterosexuals, children. HHV8 (the microbial cause of Kaposi's) is uncommon in most groups in the US except for gay men, so KS is more common in gays than other groups. Why is this hard to understand?
(2) Nearly all the AIDS cases were confined to several different population groups including gay men, IV drug addicts, hemophiliacs, and Africans. Yet each of those groups tended to get entirely different versions of “AIDS,†each having different collections of symptoms. If all those illnesses were caused by the same HIV virus, why would the particular symptoms generally be so different in each group?
�
Those "strange cancers" - I presume you mean Kaposi's - are extremely common in Africans with AIDS. In fact, during the 1990s KS was the commonest cancer in Uganda out of all the cancers. The incidence of AIDS-related KS in Africa closely follows the local prevalence of HHV8.
Take, for example, Africans. Supposedly hundreds of thousands of Africans have died from AIDS due to their HIV infections. Yet as far as I know, virtually none of those Africans ever got the same notorious AIDS-disease symptoms that were so common among American AIDS victims, such as those strange cancers and such.
�
Where did you get "hundreds of millions" from? The estimated prevalence of HIV in subsaharan Africa is around 25 to 27 million, or around 2-2.5% of the overall population. Around 80% now have access to antiretrovirals. Most Africans live in cities and towns, not rural areas. And most Africans live in countries not affected by civil wars.
Do you seriously believe that hundreds of millions of rural Africans have been diligently taking all their HIV drugs every day in the midst of civil wars and chaos? And if not, why haven’t they all died of AIDS during the last decade or so?
�
Perhaps someone at the New York Times knows how to do a google search?Replies: @Ron Unz
I realize that you always believe every single word published in the New York Times, but aren’t you a little suspicious why they’ve never asked that simple question over the last couple of decades?
�
First, once again my apologies for the delay in responding to your comments, but I’ve been very preoccupied with other matters.
you cannot extrapolate from a highly selected group of teenagers to the US population as a whole. The male-female ratio of HIV in the US as a whole is not 50/50 – it’s roughly 75/25.
I find it ridiculous to claim that military enlistees are a “highly selected group of teenagers.” My impression was that HIV tests on that population were probably the largest scale and least selective such samples in American society, therefore the most likely to provide indications of HIV infections in the general American population. What broader and less selective national samples do you have supporting your 75/25 HIV-positive gender ratio?
AIDS is a disease of the immune system, which leaves sufferers vulnerable to a range of opportunistic infections. Which particular opportunistic infections you get depends on what is already around in your body or your environment.
I find it very doubtful that the supposed pattern of “opportunistic infections” among the different categories of AIDS victims seems so discordant. According to the published claims of Duesberg and his scientific allies, the typical symptoms of “AIDS” among the various different high-prevalence populations (e.g. gay men, IV drug users, hemophiliacs, Haitians, Africans in Africa) were quite different. I find this extremely suspicious.
https://www.unz.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/duesberg-koehnlein-rasnick.pdf
For example, Googling around a bit indicates that hemophiliacs and IV drug users only very rarely got KS cancers.
Where did you get “hundreds of millions†from? The estimated prevalence of HIV in subsaharan Africa is around 25 to 27 million, or around 2-2.5% of the overall population. Around 80% now have access to antiretrovirals. Most Africans live in cities and towns, not rural areas. And most Africans live in countries not affected by civil wars.
According to Wikipedia, the rate of HIV positivity among pregnant women in South Africa rose from 0.8% in 1990 to 4.3% in 1993 to 24.5% in 2000.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HIV/AIDS_in_South_Africa#Demographics
This suggests the dramatic speed with which HIV would spread within African populations. South Africa has the most solid public health statistics in Sub-Saharan Africa, so I’d expect that similar exponential growth had been occurring in many other African countries, but with much less visibility. Can you explain to me why you don’t think this had happened? And do you seriously believe that Africans in all these disorganized countries, suffering from civil wars, famines, and urban chaos, are carefully taking their daily doses of HIV drugs? If not, why haven’t millions or even tens of millions of them died of AIDS over the last 20-odd years?
I remember back in the late 1980s or early 1990s there was a popular fictional novel describing an African continent largely depopulated due to AIDS by the early 2000s, a scenario that seemed at least conceivable at the time. But despite the apparent exponential spread of HIV infections, absolutely none of those dire predictions came to pass.
I don't know how I can explain it more simply. The majority of US males with HIV were infected through gay sex or injecting drug use. The majority of US females have been infected through heterosexual sex. The US military in the 1980s excluded most males in HIV risk groups as a matter of policy, but did not exclude the majority of females at risk. This skews the male/female ratio in this sample relative to the population as whole.
I find it ridiculous to claim that military enlistees are a “highly selected group of teenagers.†My impression was that HIV tests on that population were probably the largest scale and least selective such samples in American society, therefore the most likely to provide indications of HIV infections in the general American population.
�
HIV infection is a notifiable disease in the US. All new cases in the entire country are reported to the CDC each year, and these statistics are published annually. The male/female ratio is always 75/25, give or take a few per cent. There is no large hidden epidemic in women: if there were this would show up in the millions of low risk women are screened each year through blood donations, antenatal screening or military applicants. In the study in question, for example, they found only 48 HIV positive girls among 150,043 applicants - a rate considerably lower than known cases among US women.
What broader and less selective national samples do you have supporting your 75/25 HIV-positive gender ratio?
�
I presume you're referring to Table 2 in that paper. It's nonsense. Duesberg et al claim that Kaposi's is rare in Africa - it's not, and its incidence closely follows the local prevalence of HHV8. They claim that lymphoma is rare in IDUs, children, transfusion recipients, etc. It's not: it's the commonest cancer in all these groups. They claim TB is a "highly representative" OI in US children. It's not. Bacterial pneumonia is common in all AIDS risk groups, as are wasting and dementia. I don't know why they think transfusion recipients don't get these.
I find it very doubtful that the supposed pattern of “opportunistic infections†among the different categories of AIDS victims seems so discordant. According to the published claims of Duesberg and his scientific allies, the typical symptoms of “AIDS†among the various different high-prevalence populations (e.g. gay men, IV drug users, hemophiliacs, Haitians, Africans in Africa) were quite different. I find this extremely suspicious.
https://www.unz.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/duesberg-koehnlein-rasnick.pdf
�
There are 54 countries in Africa, each with different cultures, histories and economic conditions. Why should the HIV epidemic in each follow exactly the same trajectory as in South Africa? You seem to be suggesting that there are "hundreds of millions" of HIV infections that no one has noticed. Where, exactly do you think these infections have occurred?
According to Wikipedia, the rate of HIV positivity among pregnant women in South Africa rose from 0.8% in 1990 to 4.3% in 1993 to 24.5% in 2000.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HIV/AIDS_in_South_Africa#Demographics
This suggests the dramatic speed with which HIV would spread within African populations. South Africa has the most solid public health statistics in Sub-Saharan Africa, so I’d expect that similar exponential growth had been occurring in many other African countries, but with much less visibility. Can you explain to me why you don’t think this had happened?
�
What do you think they are doing with the HIV drugs that have been distributed to them? Of course they take them. And yes, millions have, in fact, died in the past 20 years. In 2005 the rate was around 2 million a year. But with the rollout of antiretrovirals this figure has been cut to around 300,000 to 400,000 annually.
And do you seriously believe that Africans in all these disorganized countries, suffering from civil wars, famines, and urban chaos, are carefully taking their daily doses of HIV drugs? If not, why haven’t millions or even tens of millions of them died of AIDS over the last 20-odd years?
�
Even at its worst in 2005, deaths from HIV/AIDS were around 2 million, deaths from other causes around 11 million, and births around 37 million for a net gain of 24 million people (leaving aside migrations). For Africa's population to go backwards due to HIV/AIDS deaths there would have to be ten times as many such deaths as there actually were, even at its worst.
I remember back in the late 1980s or early 1990s there was a popular fictional novel describing an African continent largely depopulated due to AIDS by the early 2000s, a scenario that seemed at least conceivable at the time. But despite the apparent exponential spread of HIV infections, absolutely none of those dire predictions came to pass. �
A black woman by the name of Mrs Acquilla Clemons saw the murder of Office J.D. Tippit (refer to the 3 min video below):
Oswald murdered officer Tippett and was seen by 5 eyewitnesses.
�
Oswald’s paraffin tests were negative for his cheek, so he had NOT fired a rifle, but positive for his hand, so he had fired a hand gun. Mind you, the brainwashed wankers will probably assert that he fired one-handed, from a hip-shot position. Yee haw!!!
Don't waste your time communicating with an Aborigine -- he/she/it is from Australia. He is phony that always pretends to be something he is not. I have delivered course material on how to identify and defend against bioweapons used to attack people and the food supply all over the country. Most of these courses were taught in CA and the counter-terrorism HQ in Brooklyn. Thank you for your comments. BLMReplies: @mulga mumblebrain
If they were, it was t in the newspapers and the time. And no one except the state department and Kennedy close advisors were aware of the secret negotiations , least if all Oswald. The Russians had already removed the missiles that Kennedy objected to.
�
The purest essence of Judaic race hatred and arrogance. Schlomo, you’re a tribute to your tribe.
Miriam, what would I do without your wise counsel?
You don’t know Mark Lane was a Jew .... You loathe and despise Jews.
�
This proves what we've long suspected about you:
'Mark Lane (who was a Jew) was a well connected wealthy lawyer with considerable clout in the Democratic Party establishment'.
�
You forgot Chomsky, TV. Plenty of good Jews, but, alas, a shrinking minority.
No I didn't. He was never going to make the grade as a righteous Jew.
You forgot Chomsky
�
Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
Summary: Chomsky has been a tool of the establishment for decades and very likely a CIA asset. To the extent he voices any opposition in recent times (and it's bugger all as far I've seen), it's been in the capacity of Controlled Opposition.
Same goes for Bernie Sanders - who I knew from Day One was a worthless piece of shit.
Contrast him with someone like Dr Ron Paul - who NEVER wavered, never backed down under pressure from ZOG, always stuck to his positions consistently since the 1970's (positions that ALL proved to be 100% right).
�
Since I’ve sunk this much time into jotting out this or that about the subject. I first got interested in the assassination perhaps 1985 or 6. Just off a book about JFK out of B Dalton’s a parent picked up. It was photo heavy and featured the ‘backyard’ photo of Oswald with the rifle.
Through the 90s I’ve read every pro conspiracy book I could get my hands on. Some actual tomes of reading. So next to your typical American I’m way beyond in knowledge of the subject. Having said that, would I absolve Oswald of the crime, discount the Arlen Spectre SBT? To be entirely honest I cannot.
There’s a lot of discussion and arguing to be made just in regard to the TSBD building and all the conflicting accounts, contradictions, and so forth that it routinely turns into sprawling back & forth pissing matches.
Here’s one thing that should be obvious to anybody. If Oswald and Oswald alone committed the assassination in both planning and execution, there is no reason whatsoever that the US government in 2025 should still be playing games in holding back anything from the public as we see going on to this very day. As I’ve pointed out before, you could grant Oswald as the lone sniper, endorse the SBT, but Oswald (acting as the lone assassin) could have STILL been a cog in a much broader conspiracy. Which in fact looks to be the case when you really consider it all.
The backyard photos are obvious fakes, which is easy to discern for knowledgeable image analysts who note that Oswald's face is identical in all three of the backyard pics, which is an impossible result with a hand-held camera and a live subject, and is therefore a sure sign of a paste-up, just as Oswald exclaimed when shown the picture by Will Fritz.
It was photo heavy and featured the ‘backyard’ photo of Oswald with the rifle...So next to your typical American I’m way beyond in knowledge of the subject.
�
Telegram comment posted by Dr Peter McCullough:
BREAKING: Insurance Data Reveals U.S. Mortality Crisis Persists—Mass COVID-19 “Vaccination” Likely to Blame
Sharp rises in young cardiac, neurological, and cancer-related deaths persist in the wake of the mass COVID-19 mRNA injection campaign. Population mortality should go down after a pandemic–not up. Implies the mass vaccination campaign has backfired and is contributing to mortality from multiple causes. @McCulloughFund https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-insurance-data-reveals-us?r=14jb45
Stolen contraband intended for overseas is entirely different from ‘unused’ items your local army surplus obtained through government auctions.
That hasn't been proven though. There's is no conclusive findings on how he obtained the ammunition. And that's not to argue guilt or innocence, that's just a fact. There is no proof the ammo was sold out of a gun store (it possibly could have been), but there's no conclusive proof of that. One curiosity of the entire thing that isn't out there 'kookish' is he went about obtaining a rifle with assassinations in mind establishing a clean paper trail linking him directly to it via a post office box. He was trained in the Marines if I recall correctly on an M1 Garand (semi-auto) The choice of an Italian ww2 bolt-action from fascist Italy (for a communist revolutionary) seems an odd choice (especially in Texas at the time). As some other commenter pointed out, he could have walked out of anywhere with a semi-auto with a magazine capacity 3 times the Carcano.How many Texans in 1963 opted for a surplus Carcano for sporting use? I would venture to guess not too many. So what you're left with is a weapon that excludes quite a high percent of the gun owning public in Texas at the time. And obvious point, if he's walking into gun stores to purchase ammunition; why not purchase a rifle in the same fashion?It's not to argue guilt one way or the other, it's just an observation based on what is known. You can speculate the ammo got back to Oswald however you want, but the fact is that was never conclusively determined. And that would be a detail any investigation would focus heavily upon. Every gun retailer in the state on into New Orleans would fall under scrutiny (you're talking crime of the century up to that point in time)Either they were inept to locate this retailer (or there was no retailer) or they weren't really motivated for whatever reason to investigate the origins of the ammo in too much depth. Perhaps because it tied into some black budget regime change operation or some other can of worms tied into the assassination itself. Who's to say? But at the very least it's a suspicious loose end in such a high profile crime. And it's not 'kook theory' to realize that, such as it is putting forth shooting through windshields, 'dum-dum' underloaded rounds or any other similar nonsense.Replies: @Alden
All it proves is that it was stolen and sold to a gun store at some time.
�
So you’re not aware that America is full of army surplus stores where unused supplies are sold to civilians? Everything from clothes to camping equipment to fire arms bullets gun oil etc.
Thank you Ron for this “summary” of health issues and challenges most people are not aware of, to say the least, including in the most educated circles.
In RFK Jr book “Fauci, Gates & Big Pharma”, the AIDS section was the most striking for me, as I had never heard of the Duesberg assumption, nor of the fact that both Montagnier & Gallo, who were both rivalling to be recognised as AIDS virus identifiers, did later recognize that this virus was not really responsible for the disease.
The AIDS-care community and ecosystem is very important, as it was the cornerstone of Fauci’s career and power, allowing him to eventually lead US response to Covid 19 ; similarly, Paris-based AIDS experts were put in charge of France’s response, whereas France’s most prominent infectious disease experts were in Marseille around Pr Raoult, the most quoted author world-wide in microbiogy, and were hardly fought by state and media.
The craziness during the Covid 19 crisis triggered many readings, including those about the French icon Pasteur, the many strange things around his discoveries and quality of evidence supporting them, the Pasteur-Bechamp controversy (see book “Pasteur or Bechamp” by Ethel Douglas Hume).
“Turtle…” was also for me a game changer, in addition to all what Bob Kennedy already put in his book (including Gates’ appalling vaccine initiatives in Afrika and Asia, not to mention his famous Ted talk on how vaccination would contribute to population control); Turtles’ high quality of facts and analysis may have triggered a very unique initiative : a book “Turtles All the Way Down: In Search of Turtle’s Truth in All Vaccination”, mimicking the name and cover of the controversial book published one year before.
https://goodereader.com/blog/amazon-news/amazons-struggle-with-fake-books-and-piracy
I wish all the best to Bob Kennedy, do already pay tribute to his early initiatives, and hope he will be allowed to remain in place in order to develop his strategy and fullfill his mission during the entire Trump admin.
What species of MORON is this? Alcohol harms have NOTHING to do with the harms of BigPharma and Big Agribusiness poisons, you poltroon. How do organisms get this dumb, and yet it seems to think itself clever.
The first real opposition to the Warren nonsense that I know of was Bertrand Russell’s ’16 Questions on the JFK Assassination’ of 6 September 1964. Russell. one of the greatest logicians ever, spotted the ludicrousies of the ‘lone gun-man’ lie immediately. I would imagine that Bertie’s turds were more intelligent than you.
Miriam, what would I do without your wise counsel?
You don’t know Mark Lane was a Jew .... You loathe and despise Jews.
�
This proves what we've long suspected about you:
'Mark Lane (who was a Jew) was a well connected wealthy lawyer with considerable clout in the Democratic Party establishment'.
�
And I, have nothing but contempt for you. And disdain for your ignorance. My user name means something in American history. But you, an ignorant lunatic foreigner don’t know what it means. I can understand the hysterical obsession of Americans with Kennedy
We were bombarded with Kennedy family propaganda from 1930 to the present day. Almost 100 years.
But you’re an internet scrabbler foreigner. Who is too stupid to realize the incredible damage John and Robert Kennedy did to White Americans.
Affirmative action. destroying our great cities with school desegregation, funding numerous White taxpayer paid programs for blacks.. The Kennedys named their programs for blacks the Great Society His successor re named it the War on Poverty. Kennedy created USAID now after 64 years exposed as an incredible looting of American workers tax money.
It was Kennedy who forced W Germany to accept Turk guest workers from the most primitive parts of rural Turkey.
I follow the French proverb. Don’t listen to what he says. Look at what he does. And I have looked carefully at what Kennedy did.
In Kennedy’s case it was more what his speech writers and hagiographers wrote about him than anything he said.
You’re an ignorant idiot in love with the empty Kennedy myth. That was created before you were born. Get interested in UFOs. Or Graham Hancock. Or the world began 6,000 years ago. They’re all more valid and real than the Kennedy myth created because Joe Kennedy the founder owned a Hollywood movie studio And paid his publicity agents and screen writers to create the Kennedy myth.
Just as Joe created the low cost cowboy movie. And the first famous cowboy actor Tom Mix. Or how the Hollywood system can find any reasonably attractive young man or woman and make them famous movie stars in a few years.
Or with a bottle of black hair dye turn a dancer with light brown hair into an exotic Spanish actress. And with a bottle of red hair dye turn her into an Irish actress.
Check out what Kennedy did. Not what hagiographers say about him.
Miriam Alden-son writes:
You don’t know Mark Lane was a Jew …. You loathe and despise Jews.
Miriam, what would I do without your wise counsel?
I guess that explains why I wrote this in comment # 483:
‘Mark Lane (who was a Jew) was a well connected wealthy lawyer with considerable clout in the Democratic Party establishment’.
This proves what we’ve long suspected about you:
1) You’re a demented old yenta
2) You don’t actually read what other people write – instead you rush off and post yet more ADL approved B.S that gets you 50 cents per word from your Jewish benefactors.
Of course, as everyone who’s been following my commentary in UR over the years knows well, I have been effusive in my praise of countless Jews who are EXPOSING ZOG’s MISCHIEF MAKING.
ie: Jews like Lynn Margulis (9/11), Prof. Harvey Risch, Dr Brett Weinstein, Dr Andrew Kaufman (during the Covid Psyop), Peter Schiff (premier financial commentator WITH INTEGRITY in the world today), Max Blumenthal and Aaron Mate (geopolitical experts at the GrayZone), and countless others (like Mark Lane – who has been a champion of truth on the JFK coup d’etat since Day One).
What I despise is LIARS and those aiding and abetting ZOG CRIMINALITY, irrespective of their ethnic background (ie: people like you).
So, John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Nancy Pelosi, Mitch McConnell, Winston Churchill, FDR, Tony Blair, Justin Trudeau, Gavin Newsom and the other tens of thousands of goyim foot soldiers of ZOG over the years, I actually despise even more than any Jew.
These people have sold out for a few shekels of silver. I have nothing but contempt for them.
Affidavits are not infallible. You only swear to tell the truth "to the best of my knowledge," but people can be mistaken. In his testimony before the Warren Commission, Weitzman only says the gun "appeared" to be a Mauser, as "in a glance, that's what it looked like." Once again, no mention of reading the manufacturer's stamp.
Sorry, but Weitzman’s affidavit is proof enough that a Mauser was initially found.
�
Affidavits are not infallible. You only swear to tell the truth “to the best of my knowledge,†but people can be mistaken. In his testimony before the Warren Commission, Weitzman only says the gun “appeared†to be a Mauser, as “in a glance, that’s what it looked like.†Once again, no mention of reading the manufacturer’s stamp.
This is all special pleading because you and the other WC apologists don’t have a leg to stand on.
One did not need to be an “expert” to notice and read the manufacturer’s imprints on the rifle initially found in the TSBD and identified by all present as a “Mauser,” but you would have had to have been as blind as the proverbial bat to have missed them.
One more time: As the Mauser and the Carcano were similar in appearance, the only infallible way of identifying the weapons – or any gun! – was by noting and reading the manufacturer’s imprints on the firearm, and I daresay nobody with his eyes open can mistake or misread “Mauser” in place of “Carcano.”
The Dallas PD had the Mauser in its possession for several hours before Weitzman swore his affidavit, but I guess we’re supposed to believe that none of those Dallas cops could read, or possibly that they all had their eyes completely wide shut.
But yeah, Weitzman appears to have been one of the Dallas good ol’ boys who managed to become a Dallas constable after considerable experience working in a ladies dress shop and a sporting goods store!
But Seymour Weitzman had been a POW of the Japanese during WWII after his B-29 was shot down. Reportedly, he suffered a nervous breakdown later in life, after Dallas, and was institutionalized, plausibly because of the intense pressure he endured that compelled him to change his story about the Mauser.
Some of the Parkland doctors also came under intense pressure, as noted by Dr. Charles Crenshaw in his 1992 book JFK: A Conspiracy of Silence:
Dr. Crenshaw of Parkland Hospital, who attended Kennedy… tells an awful tale of being terrified of the gun wielding Secret Servicemen who hovered ominously over the proceedings in the operating room. Crenshaw says absolutely Kennedy was shot from the FRONT…
It was at that moment that he truly realized what had happened… it wasn’t the one gunman from the 6th floor of the Book Depository who took his life… rather shots from directly in front of Kennedy… that killed him.
The chaos of the operating room with Secret Servicemen toting guns, to Admiral Burkley… Kennedy’s and Johnson’ doctor barking orders to do this and not do that, and who desperately wanted the doctors to think that the shots that killed him were from behind.
After years of his own analysis, through talking with those present at Parkland, there is only one conclusion to be made, and Crenshaw says it… Kennedy was killed by factions of his own government… JFK was surrounded by traitors who were sworn to protect him. Every American should read this book and weep. Our government was seized by dark forces that day and we have never recovered as a nation. Dr. Crenshaw is a true patriot.
[my edits]
Indeed! Hear hear!
In the final analysis, truth-seekers and WC skeptics also owe a big debt of gratitude to Seymour Weitzman for being honest enough at the outset to swear the rifle found in the TSBD was a Mauser, which inconvenient fact completely overturns the entire bogus WC Report, as do the initial statements of the Parkland doctors that Pres. Kennedy had been shot twice from the front.
Intensive reading makes no difference to an IQ test result.
That isn’t how it works.
Mark Lane (who was a Jew) was a well connected wealthy lawyer with considerable clout in the Democratic Party establishment.
How did Mark Lane’s Rush To Judgement, which featured Roger Craig’s story (he has 6 references in the index), get published?
�
Did you personally conduct the toxicology report?
He died by suicide, with a Blood alcohol level of 0.3 mixed with Valium.
�
I never read or paid attention to the Warren report or communist Moshe Levin’s Rush to Judgment book exonerating fellow communist Oswald from the murders of Kennedy and Tippit. You don’t know Mark Lane was a Jew communist do you?
You loathe and despise Jews. You suffer from the insane delusion that anyone who disagrees with you is a Jew. And your delusions about Jews are a valid symptom of your insanity.
But you believe every word in the book Rush to Judgement by an anti White communist Jew.
You and the other WKK loons have no idea of how the anti White democrat party communist radical left panicked when one of their own, Oswald, murdered their great hero President Kennedy. Before the funeral they were screeching that fellow communist Oswald didn’t do it.
I was never interested until the late 1990s. A friend inherited her uncle’s house and contents. Knowing we like to read she gave us several cartons of uncle’s books. About 90 100. He must gave belonged to book of the month club. A mail order book seller very popular in America. The Kennedy genre was always featured in book of the month club selections. Lots of WKK books in those cartons. I read them all and then read more. American public libraries have entire shelves devoted to the WKK genre. So I didn’t waste any money on the loony theories.
I read all those Kennedy books. What I saw was the chronological order of the suspects. First KKK White supremacista angry that Kennedy catered to the blacks . Which he did. The steel and oil industry. Castro to retaliate against Kennedy’s invasion of Cuba and many attempts to kill Castro. Anti Castro Cubans in America Then the Republican president after Johnson Nixon. Then President Bush sr. Read a lot of those books and they get crazier and crazier. Mrs Kennedy’s second husband killed Kennedy, an entire book.
It wasn’t until about 40 years after the murder that books came out claiming the most obvious suspect, president Johnson killed Kennedy. Those democrat writers didn’t even touch “ who benefits “ till decades after the murder.
I’m a cynic have been since first year of high school. And I’m very cynical about the endless books and websites claiming the only viable suspect Oswald didn’t kill Kennedy.
None of the books and websites name a suspect. Just the CIA the KKK White supremacists advisors to president Nixon President Bush Sr steel industry oil industry on and on.
The only suspects named in those books were two advisors to president Nixon named Halderman and Erlichman. Accused 10 years after Kennedy was killed. And President Bush St accused about 25 years after the murder. No evidence, just accusations, pictures of three average looking White men the writers claimed were Bush Erlichman and Halderman,
If you and the other WKK loons think the records recently released will solve the murder, they won’t. Have you ever seen a redacted document? Of course not. Everything released is covered in black ink. Not just paragraphs but entire pages.
Miriam, what would I do without your wise counsel?
You don’t know Mark Lane was a Jew .... You loathe and despise Jews.
�
This proves what we've long suspected about you:
'Mark Lane (who was a Jew) was a well connected wealthy lawyer with considerable clout in the Democratic Party establishment'.
�
All it proves is that it was stolen and sold to a gun store at some time.
That hasn’t been proven though. There’s is no conclusive findings on how he obtained the ammunition. And that’s not to argue guilt or innocence, that’s just a fact.
There is no proof the ammo was sold out of a gun store (it possibly could have been), but there’s no conclusive proof of that. One curiosity of the entire thing that isn’t out there ‘kookish’ is he went about obtaining a rifle with assassinations in mind establishing a clean paper trail linking him directly to it via a post office box.
He was trained in the Marines if I recall correctly on an M1 Garand (semi-auto) The choice of an Italian ww2 bolt-action from fascist Italy (for a communist revolutionary) seems an odd choice (especially in Texas at the time). As some other commenter pointed out, he could have walked out of anywhere with a semi-auto with a magazine capacity 3 times the Carcano.
How many Texans in 1963 opted for a surplus Carcano for sporting use? I would venture to guess not too many. So what you’re left with is a weapon that excludes quite a high percent of the gun owning public in Texas at the time. And obvious point, if he’s walking into gun stores to purchase ammunition; why not purchase a rifle in the same fashion?
It’s not to argue guilt one way or the other, it’s just an observation based on what is known. You can speculate the ammo got back to Oswald however you want, but the fact is that was never conclusively determined. And that would be a detail any investigation would focus heavily upon. Every gun retailer in the state on into New Orleans would fall under scrutiny (you’re talking crime of the century up to that point in time)
Either they were inept to locate this retailer (or there was no retailer) or they weren’t really motivated for whatever reason to investigate the origins of the ammo in too much depth. Perhaps because it tied into some black budget regime change operation or some other can of worms tied into the assassination itself. Who’s to say? But at the very least it’s a suspicious loose end in such a high profile crime. And it’s not ‘kook theory’ to realize that, such as it is putting forth shooting through windshields, ‘dum-dum’ underloaded rounds or any other similar nonsense.
You and the other loons claim Oswald was innocent. You and the other loons claim no shots were fired from the building where Oswald worked. You and the other loons claim the shots were fired from here there and everywhere but the building where Oswald worked.
Has any loon claimed that one of the couple dozen Oswald doubles rode to work with Wesley Buell that day?
So since Oswald was innocent and the rifle was planted in the building was planted by the real murder, why obsess about the rifle?
You claim to have been in law enforcement but it couldn't have been in any position that required very much thinking, as you demonstrate here.Once you take away the Carcano, there is no link at all between Lee Harvey Oswald and the assassination of Pres. Kennedy. Of course, the paper trail linking Oswald to the Carcarno is itself very tenuous and highly questionable, but there is no evidence of any kind linking him to a Mauser. So if a Mauser originally had been found by the cops, it's further proof Oswald couldn't have done it, and we'd have to find a different suspect, or at least a different patsy, in the assassination of Pres. Kennedy. Consider this. By all accounts, a Carcano and a Mauser were similar in appearance, but of different calibers. Seemingly, the only quick and reliable method of distinguishing the two - or of positively identifying any weapon - would have been by reading the manufacturer's markings on the weapon.Replies: @Captain Jones, @Alden
If the rifle was a Mauser what exactly would that prove?????
�
None of the officers who rushed to the sixth floor looked at the manufacturers stamp. They were busy looking for the killer or killers.
Law enforcement looks for viable real evidence. The rifle found was clearly identified as a Carcano when officers saw the manufacturers stamp on it.
You don’t know a thing about evidence collecting and investigating crimes.
And since you believe Oswald was innocent why quibble about cops in that extremely stressful situation not taking extra care to carefully examine the rifle. When they had to find the suspect.
If Oswald was innocent and seen by witnesses in another part of the building when the shots were fired why do you obsess about an alleged identification of the rifle Oswald never owned , never touched , didn’t use to murder Kennedy????????
2 thousand books 2 thousand theories millions of loons obsessing about irrelevant details created by the WKK industry. The rifle after the police looked at the manufacturer stamp was positively identified as a Carcano. Oswald was 5 ft 9 in his Marine records. If someone told the police looking for him Oswald was 5 ft 10 or 5ft 8 entire books and websites would obsess about his exact height.
All of it to deflect from the most important fact. Oswald was a great admirer of Castro . And Kennedy was very anti Castro Motive
Hank Bowman and other eye witnesses on the sidewalk who saw him use a rifle to shoot Kennedy. The three co workers at windows directly underneath Oswald’s window heard the shots felt the vibration and saw dusting falling from heat ducts and shelves. Irrefutable direct evidence.
Circumstantial evidence that he was the only worker that left the building in the few minutes it took the police to get from the sidewalk to the sixth floor window.
The fact that the rifle belonged to Oswald, that there was a clear record from the Chicago seller to Oswald’s mailbox and from where it was stored in the Payne garage to Wesley Buell’s car taken into the building by Oswald walking with Buell. Is also clear and present viable evidence.
FYI, motive isn’t evidence for trials It’s just another investigative tool. Usually used by defense counsel and anti White pro criminal progressive media to defend obviously guilty.
You know nothing about investigating crime or putting together a viable case. And it shows.
A cop in an extremely stress situation looked a rifle he didn’t pick up and examine and thought it was a Mauser. Doesn’t prove Oswald innocent as you claim. Every officer who went to the sixth floor wrote a report as was standard procedure. Not one of those reports identified the rifle as a Mauser.
I’m sure you can find a manual of criminal investigation on the internet. Read it before displaying more ignorance
Again, it doesn't matter what I believe. What I believe doesn't change the fact that technically the bullets recovered were property of the US government once the order was filled and they were out the door.
So you’re another idiot who believes no military ammunition never goes missing and ends up in civilian gun stores.
�
Military supplies from food to firearms is often stolen and ends up being bought by civilians. Mauser vs Carcano; did some evil assassin planners supply Oswald with a special bullet meant for Greece and Albania not Libya???
The Oswald was innocent believers quibble over where he bought the bullet. Not viable proof he didn’t shoot Kennedy and was allegedly seen by co workers in the lunch room or on the stairs here and there in the warehouse at the exact time Kennedy was shot.
Oswald defenders should concentrate on viable evidence to prove he was not on the sixth floor shooting the rifle at the exact time Kennedy was shot.
It’s incredible that you’re not aware that military supplies are stolen all along the line from the factory to the bases.
Any allegations right or wrong about the bullet allegedly used does not prove Oswald innocent or guilty. All it proves is that it was stolen and sold to a gun store at some time. The WKK loons deny Oswald bought that bullet. It was planted by the evil 😈 men who arranged the murder. Direct from an American base in Greece. Or maybe from a top secret army warehouse. The more you read WKK books the more they contradict themselves.
For instance at the time Kennedy was murdered no one but family friends neighbors and people he was in business with had heard of George Bush Sr.
More than 20 years later, when he became president the WKK loons found a picture of an average looking White man watching the parade. And wrote books and articles claiming that the man was George Bush Sr directing the assassination.
Lyndon Johnson had a viable motive that would lead an ordinary detective to investigate Johnson. So did Mrs Kennedy’s second husband, Aristotle Onassis. He wouldn’t be the first to kill a man and marry the widow.
But what motive would Bush Sr have back in 1963 to kill the president? . That Bush was in Dallas in business that day? As he was numerous times a year? That’s not a motive. I was working in a building just a few blocks away when the Mayor and a county supervisor of San Francisco were murdered. Does that make me involved in those assassinations?????
The more you read the very popular and profitable WKK genre the more you realize how insane they all are.
That first book Rush to Judgment by Moshe Levin fellow communist of Oswald was very very obviously written by a communist to exonerate and deflect attention from the communist who murdered Kennedy.
Like John Grisham books , WKK is a major money maker for publishers and book stores.
That hasn't been proven though. There's is no conclusive findings on how he obtained the ammunition. And that's not to argue guilt or innocence, that's just a fact. There is no proof the ammo was sold out of a gun store (it possibly could have been), but there's no conclusive proof of that. One curiosity of the entire thing that isn't out there 'kookish' is he went about obtaining a rifle with assassinations in mind establishing a clean paper trail linking him directly to it via a post office box. He was trained in the Marines if I recall correctly on an M1 Garand (semi-auto) The choice of an Italian ww2 bolt-action from fascist Italy (for a communist revolutionary) seems an odd choice (especially in Texas at the time). As some other commenter pointed out, he could have walked out of anywhere with a semi-auto with a magazine capacity 3 times the Carcano.How many Texans in 1963 opted for a surplus Carcano for sporting use? I would venture to guess not too many. So what you're left with is a weapon that excludes quite a high percent of the gun owning public in Texas at the time. And obvious point, if he's walking into gun stores to purchase ammunition; why not purchase a rifle in the same fashion?It's not to argue guilt one way or the other, it's just an observation based on what is known. You can speculate the ammo got back to Oswald however you want, but the fact is that was never conclusively determined. And that would be a detail any investigation would focus heavily upon. Every gun retailer in the state on into New Orleans would fall under scrutiny (you're talking crime of the century up to that point in time)Either they were inept to locate this retailer (or there was no retailer) or they weren't really motivated for whatever reason to investigate the origins of the ammo in too much depth. Perhaps because it tied into some black budget regime change operation or some other can of worms tied into the assassination itself. Who's to say? But at the very least it's a suspicious loose end in such a high profile crime. And it's not 'kook theory' to realize that, such as it is putting forth shooting through windshields, 'dum-dum' underloaded rounds or any other similar nonsense.Replies: @Alden
All it proves is that it was stolen and sold to a gun store at some time.
�
Sorry, but Weitzman’s affidavit is proof enough that a Mauser was initially found.
Affidavits are not infallible. You only swear to tell the truth “to the best of my knowledge,” but people can be mistaken. In his testimony before the Warren Commission, Weitzman only says the gun “appeared” to be a Mauser, as “in a glance, that’s what it looked like.” Once again, no mention of reading the manufacturer’s stamp.
Incidentally, Weitzman went over his employment history in his testimony. He makes no mention of owning any sporting goods store but says he managed stores that sold “dresses…ladies’ garments.” This is your gun expert?!
This is all special pleading because you and the other WC apologists don't have a leg to stand on.
Affidavits are not infallible. You only swear to tell the truth “to the best of my knowledge,†but people can be mistaken. In his testimony before the Warren Commission, Weitzman only says the gun “appeared†to be a Mauser, as “in a glance, that’s what it looked like.†Once again, no mention of reading the manufacturer’s stamp.
�
Indeed! Hear hear!
Dr. Crenshaw of Parkland Hospital, who attended Kennedy... tells an awful tale of being terrified of the gun wielding Secret Servicemen who hovered ominously over the proceedings in the operating room. Crenshaw says absolutely Kennedy was shot from the FRONT...
It was at that moment that he truly realized what had happened... it wasn't the one gunman from the 6th floor of the Book Depository who took his life... rather shots from directly in front of Kennedy... that killed him.
The chaos of the operating room with Secret Servicemen toting guns, to Admiral Burkley... Kennedy's and Johnson' doctor barking orders to do this and not do that, and who desperately wanted the doctors to think that the shots that killed him were from behind.
After years of his own analysis, through talking with those present at Parkland, there is only one conclusion to be made, and Crenshaw says it... Kennedy was killed by factions of his own government... JFK was surrounded by traitors who were sworn to protect him. Every American should read this book and weep. Our government was seized by dark forces that day and we have never recovered as a nation. Dr. Crenshaw is a true patriot.
[my edits]
�
Even if what you say is correct, lets assume there was a room full of Mausers found within the building. If you cannot physically link a Mauser to the actual crime, what is the point?
Sorry, but Weitzman’s affidavit is proof enough that a Mauser was initially found. Give it up!
Affidavits are not infallible. You only swear to tell the truth "to the best of my knowledge," but people can be mistaken. In his testimony before the Warren Commission, Weitzman only says the gun "appeared" to be a Mauser, as "in a glance, that's what it looked like." Once again, no mention of reading the manufacturer's stamp.
Sorry, but Weitzman’s affidavit is proof enough that a Mauser was initially found.
�
You claim to have been in law enforcement but it couldn't have been in any position that required very much thinking, as you demonstrate here.Once you take away the Carcano, there is no link at all between Lee Harvey Oswald and the assassination of Pres. Kennedy. Of course, the paper trail linking Oswald to the Carcarno is itself very tenuous and highly questionable, but there is no evidence of any kind linking him to a Mauser. So if a Mauser originally had been found by the cops, it's further proof Oswald couldn't have done it, and we'd have to find a different suspect, or at least a different patsy, in the assassination of Pres. Kennedy. Consider this. By all accounts, a Carcano and a Mauser were similar in appearance, but of different calibers. Seemingly, the only quick and reliable method of distinguishing the two - or of positively identifying any weapon - would have been by reading the manufacturer's markings on the weapon.Replies: @Captain Jones, @Alden
If the rifle was a Mauser what exactly would that prove?????
�
The big problem is linking a Mauser into the crime when there is zero physical evidence having anything whatsoever to do with a Mauser. Roger Craig’s drama over actual forensic evidence is somehow an argument.
If the rifle was a Mauser what exactly would that prove?????
You claim to have been in law enforcement but it couldn’t have been in any position that required very much thinking, as you demonstrate here.
Once you take away the Carcano, there is no link at all between Lee Harvey Oswald and the assassination of Pres. Kennedy.
Of course, the paper trail linking Oswald to the Carcarno is itself very tenuous and highly questionable, but there is no evidence of any kind linking him to a Mauser.
So if a Mauser originally had been found by the cops, it’s further proof Oswald couldn’t have done it, and we’d have to find a different suspect, or at least a different patsy, in the assassination of Pres. Kennedy.
Consider this. By all accounts, a Carcano and a Mauser were similar in appearance, but of different calibers. Seemingly, the only quick and reliable method of distinguishing the two – or of positively identifying any weapon – would have been by reading the manufacturer’s markings on the weapon.
Mark Lane (who was a Jew) was a well connected wealthy lawyer with considerable clout in the Democratic Party establishment.
How did Mark Lane’s Rush To Judgement, which featured Roger Craig’s story (he has 6 references in the index), get published?
�
Did you personally conduct the toxicology report?
He died by suicide, with a Blood alcohol level of 0.3 mixed with Valium.
�
But Mark Lane had the wherewithal to get that book published – Roger Craig did not.
Josiah Thompson was not Jewish as far as I’m aware and he got Six Seconds in Dallas published in 1967. Numerous non-Jewish writers have published JFK conspiracy books over the years. And what could Craig possibly have to contribute that wasn’t already in Lane’s book? So why did ZOG allow his story in that book?
You’re exactly the sort of person for whom the JQ is hazardous. Your obsession with Jews overrides your rational faculties.
Did you personally conduct the toxicology report?
Oh well, then, I guess every toxicology ever is suspect because I didn’t conduct them personally. You’re ridiculous.
Why on earth would it be likely that none of the senators had read an Amazon #1 selling book written by a member of America’s most famous political family. What do they read?
They also didn’t raise the question of Kennedy being a former heroin addict, so maybe Fentanyl addiction is all a fiction too.
So you’re another idiot who believes no military ammunition never goes missing and ends up in civilian gun stores.
Again, it doesn’t matter what I believe. What I believe doesn’t change the fact that technically the bullets recovered were property of the US government once the order was filled and they were out the door.
The rifle could hold up to 6 rounds (he only showed up with 4 supposedly) Did he buy in bulk out of a huge barrel full of carcano ammo in some Texas gun store? Maybe, but it’s unknown because it was never investigated to conclusion. And considering it was murder by firearm, the weapon & ammo would be pretty relevant in regard to any investigation, wouldn’t you say? And you do realize in this very thread I’ve left open the possibility it may have been someone else operating the rifle. Regardless of that, I’m not so convinced to where I’m going play Lee Hervey Oswald apologist in discussions in regard to the matter. Maybe if you’re so concerned over what I do or don’t believe, maybe you should actually read my comments.
You need to keep straight who you're arguing with and what about. I haven't made any comments claiming the rifle wasn't 'good' (the opposite in fact)
If Carcanos were used decades after Kennedy’s murder they must have been fairly good rifles no? Not incapable of hitting a target 265 fee away?
�
It doesn't matter. It was a Gov order (that was the point) that's it, just that. Maybe you should take a weekend off because you can't even keep straight who you're arguing with over what. Go outside.Replies: @Alden
The ammunition was intended for Greece and Albania not N Africa. Military supplies are stolen from the factory all along th way to their final destination
�
So you’re another idiot who believes no military ammunition never goes missing and ends up in civilian gun stores.
Since Oswald didn’t kill Kennedy , and spent the entire 12 to 12/30 time period somewhere other than the 6th floor all this fussing about bullets and rifles is irrelevant
isn’t it?
Again, it doesn't matter what I believe. What I believe doesn't change the fact that technically the bullets recovered were property of the US government once the order was filled and they were out the door.
So you’re another idiot who believes no military ammunition never goes missing and ends up in civilian gun stores.
�
That entire operation was an abomination and an exercise in how directing human perception is a method of control.
Covid Psyop
�
So, what do you think of Trump’s current shenanigans in America?
I must confess – it’s so nice to finally see significant push-back to the protestations of our liberal nitwits in media/government
All the things that Donald Chump is doing (pushing back on the woke agenda, reducing the size of bloated Big Gubmint, having RFK Jr make America healthy again, rounding up illegal immigrants, setting in motion the negotiations to end the Ukraine proxy war etc), are all steps in the right direction and should be applauded.
However, in relation to the Ukraine war, in the lead up to the 2024 election I had several exchanges with MAGAts that said Donald Chump would end this war, because his natural inclination is for peacemaking.
And I responded that he likely would – but NOT for the reasons they envisaged.
Chump has no ideological or foreign policy convictions of his own. He merely follows a script – a ZOG dictated script. And if that script says ‘War’, then war it shall be.
But the Anglo-Zionist empire have squandered hundreds of billions supporting that poisonous dwarf Zelensky, and have nothing to show for it – other than a massive depletion of the military hardware/munitions of the U.S and its snivelling vassals (coupled to a huge dollop of egg left on their faces, as the mighty Russians decimated all the U.S/NATO high tech gadgetry – like HIMARS, ATACMS, M1A1 Abrams and Leopard II tanks etc – and turned it into smouldering embers).
It’s was all flushed down a rat hole.
So, in anticipation of a wider Middle East conflict (specifically war with Iran), the U.S and its vassals must replenish their stocks of military hardware/munitions and end a Two-Front war.
(ie: Either prosecute a war with Russia in the Ukraine OR fight Iran).
Because the U.S is incapable of doing both (in fact it will likely come unstuck just fighting Iran on its own).
That’s why the Ukraine war will soon wind down.
Summary: I fear that all the positive things Donald J Chump is doing now are no more than a DISTRACTION, a head fake to give the impression that the ship of state is finally heading in the right direction.
But the U.S ship of state is sinking, and all of this is mere window dressing/
It will be used as a bargaining chip, as the Orange Baboon confronts the American citizenry and says (like Bush 43 said in the lead up to the 2004 Presidential election):
‘Who do ya trust?’. ‘Who do ya trust to do what’s right for America?’And then he’ll say: ‘As you can see, I’m unwinding all the harm done by shit lib Presidents in 12 of the last 16 years. So trust me when I say that it is in America’s interests that we remove this threat to the American way of life, this sponsor of terrorists – aka Iran’.
(This may likely be preceded by a False Flag, which will naturally be blamed on Iran).
So there it is, that’s where I think this is going.
For everyone’s sake I hope I’m wrong. But the Orange Clown is totally owned by the Talmudic financiers headquartered in the ‘Square Mile’.
I don’t trust him. He’s up to no good.
(BTW, my apologies for mixing up the aliases of Shlomo McNally and Incactus.
The latter is of course the ‘gelding’. McNally is the Bolshevik Pretzel).
As usual, very lengthy one.
What is the conclusion ?
Knowledge boasting ?
Back to the subject matter at hand–RJKjr, the blue state tort lawyer. Pres Trump’s major blunder–putting a blue state democrat in charge of HHS. RFKjr is unqualified and his attack on Red State Agriculture is his personal vendetta as a tort lawyer. Not one word about his family fortune made on bootlegged alcohol. Alcohol causes cancers of the esophagus, liver, breast, colon, oral cavity, rectum, pharynx, and larynx, and cancers of the pancreas. Cancer risk can occur even with light to moderate drinking.The more alcohol consumed, the higher the cancer risk, and no amount is completely safe. Alcoholic is classified as a Group 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). An estimated 3.6% of all cancer cases and 3.5% of cancer deaths worldwide.
What about tobacco?
Thanks, TV; I’m still doing my best to terrorize the BolshevikPretzel (McNally) and his ilk. Apparently, there’s also a Slavic/Srbian Brigade, all of whom seem to love the Soviets and despise the Germans, as the Germans wrecked Slavic supremacy…
Covid Psyop
That entire operation was an abomination and an exercise in how directing human perception is a method of control.
A little off-topic, but every newborn baby in America is given an Hep B vaccine moments after birth, despite the fact that most mothers have been tested during prenatal care and/or mother could easily be tested in hospital rather than just jabbing the baby. By my own experience, the hospital does NOT ask for permission to do this. So, clearly, the entire Vaccine Industry is not/no longer primarily based on protecting health; there is an ideological and profiteering component. In my opinion, the vaccine industry is destroying, certainly undermining, the health of our children.
So, what do you think of Trump’s current shenanigans in America? I must confess – it’s so nice to finally see significant push-back to the protestations of our liberal nitwits in media/government, although they don’t go far enough. Still, it’s better than nothing – that’s where we are, sadly. Mas que nada in Texas, anyway. Based on demographics, I think it’s too late to remain “western.â€
I read that Ukraine is handing over mineral rights to the U.S. to “repay†for all that “unaccounted†military aid to fight Russia. Well, surprise, surprise. Someone wrote that Jared Kushner is the most dangerous man in America; how fortunate that he just happened to marry the daughter of America’s savior. I understand Israel-proper is mineral poor…
All the things that Donald Chump is doing (pushing back on the woke agenda, reducing the size of bloated Big Gubmint, having RFK Jr make America healthy again, rounding up illegal immigrants, setting in motion the negotiations to end the Ukraine proxy war etc), are all steps in the right direction and should be applauded.However, in relation to the Ukraine war, in the lead up to the 2024 election I had several exchanges with MAGAts that said Donald Chump would end this war, because his natural inclination is for peacemaking.
So, what do you think of Trump’s current shenanigans in America?
I must confess – it’s so nice to finally see significant push-back to the protestations of our liberal nitwits in media/government
�
So there it is, that's where I think this is going.
Summary: I fear that all the positive things Donald J Chump is doing now are no more than a DISTRACTION, a head fake to give the impression that the ship of state is finally heading in the right direction.
But the U.S ship of state is sinking, and all of this is mere window dressing/
It will be used as a bargaining chip, as the Orange Baboon confronts the American citizenry and says (like Bush 43 said in the lead up to the 2004 Presidential election):
'Who do ya trust?'. 'Who do ya trust to do what's right for America?'And then he'll say: 'As you can see, I'm unwinding all the harm done by shit lib Presidents in 12 of the last 16 years. So trust me when I say that it is in America's interests that we remove this threat to the American way of life, this sponsor of terrorists - aka Iran'.
(This may likely be preceded by a False Flag, which will naturally be blamed on Iran).
�
“(2) the cartridge cases found near the scene of the shooting were fired from the revolver in the possession of Oswald at the time of his arrest, ”
The chain of possession of the shells is a joke. Only a true believer could take the shells seriously:
The Tippit Shells
https://gil-jesus.com/the-tippit-shells/
A longer series of articles here:
How Oswald was framed for the murders of Tippit Parts 1, 2 & 3
See the quote from Mary Ferrell, comment #453. He was hoping to get speaking fees by becoming a celebrity in the conspiracy community.
And what’s this Fame and Fortune you speak of? What speaking fees? What book?
�
That's the manuscript I was referring to, retard. That's the book he was trying to get a deal for.
Iâ€M STILL EFF’N WAITING ON YOUR ANSWER (name of book and publishing date that he supposedly authored that was released during his lifetime)...
...Read that UNPUBLISHED manuscript from Roger Craig (that I posted in a link in comment # 452),
�
So you think no books positing an assassination conspiracy were able to be published?! Are you really this stupid? How did Mark Lane's Rush To Judgement, which featured Roger Craig's story (he has 6 references in the index), get published?
Even if Craig had intended on writing a book, WHERE would it have been published? (Seeing as ZOG controlled all the major publishing houses and could intimidate the smaller publishers to keep a wide berth away from such a book – or ZOG would bankrupt them).
�
He died by suicide, with a Blood alcohol level of 0.3 mixed with Valium.Replies: @Truth Vigilante
And bear in mind, Roger Craig was murdered in 1975
�
How did Mark Lane’s Rush To Judgement, which featured Roger Craig’s story (he has 6 references in the index), get published?
Mark Lane (who was a Jew) was a well connected wealthy lawyer with considerable clout in the Democratic Party establishment.
The ZOG perpetrators of the JFK coup d’etat would rather he tripped and fell down the stairs, breaking his neck – so that his book never saw the light of day.
But Mark Lane had the wherewithal to get that book published – Roger Craig did not.
You also wrote:
He died by suicide, with a Blood alcohol level of 0.3 mixed with Valium.
Did you personally conduct the toxicology report?
Admit it, YOU HAVE NO EFF’N IDEA WHAT SUBSTANCES/ALCOHOL LEVELS WERE FOUND IN ROGER CRAIG’S BLOOD.
At the end of the day, like that other fool Jim Haslime, you rely on the Warren Commission Report and other doctored official statements.
Like Haslime (and Miriam Alden-son) all of you are MINDLESS AUTOMATONS that lap up everything that the ZOG establishment dishes out to you.
Because, in your minds, those ‘wise overlords’ in Gubmint would never lie to you.
That’s why you’re fully vaxxed and boostered with the clot shots.
You’re all a bunch of gullible CHUMPS.
Josiah Thompson was not Jewish as far as I'm aware and he got Six Seconds in Dallas published in 1967. Numerous non-Jewish writers have published JFK conspiracy books over the years. And what could Craig possibly have to contribute that wasn't already in Lane's book? So why did ZOG allow his story in that book?You're exactly the sort of person for whom the JQ is hazardous. Your obsession with Jews overrides your rational faculties.
But Mark Lane had the wherewithal to get that book published – Roger Craig did not.
�
Oh well, then, I guess every toxicology ever is suspect because I didn't conduct them personally. You're ridiculous.
Did you personally conduct the toxicology report?
�
Jim Haslum writes:
On the basis of this evidence the Commission concluded that Lee Harvey Oswald killed Dallas Police Patrolman J. D. Tippit.
Anyone referencing the findings of the Warren Commission is a moron.
The WC Report is so full of holes and has been discredited a thousand times over.
Meanwhile, UR readers should watch the following video (titled ‘JFK Assassination aftermath – who killed J.D, Tippit) from 9:00-53:00:
Video LinkSome highlights:
8:45-12:00 – The timeline of events, as Oswald is somehow capable of going from the TSBD (JFK was shot around 12.30 pm, and Oswald was observed still drinking his Coke calmly in the minute or so after the shooting).
Then he allegedly travels to his home (the WC says he caught a bus, which got stuck in traffic and was going nowhere – so he jumped out and caught a cab), and supposedly walks to the scene of the Tippit shooting, who was then shot around 1.06/1.07 pm.
The whole timeline is impossible, but the corrupt Warren Commission keeps jiggling with the time figures to make it more plausible – but they can’t do it.
12:00-13:20 – Warren Reynolds (another witness – unable to identify Oswald at first. But after he was shot in the head, somehow he suddenly could).
17:00-18:10 – Dallas Police plant Oswald’s wallet at the murder scene (even though Oswald was IN POSSESSION of his wallet when apprehended later in the theatre)
19:00-19:50 – Dallas Police initially state (based on the shell casings found at the Tippit murder scene), that the killer used a 38 Automatic – but Oswald had a REVOLVER which used DIFFERENT bullets.
25:00-28:30 – Speaks of the second man that accompanied Yacob Rubinstein in killing J.D Tippit.
Rubinstein was a homosexual and this second man was someone he was sodomising from time to time. He was a male prostitute called Curtis Laverne ‘Larry’ Crafard*.
(*His original name was ‘Crawford’ but he changed it to Crafard at some point).
Th black woman Acquilla Clemons (refer to earlier video I posted), described these two men precisely as she witnesses the murder of Tippit.
30:00-32:00 – WC witness Helen Markham is featured here. As I said in comment # 420, Markham is a discredited witness – the narrator in the video says she’s ‘Bat shit crazy’ (and you’ll soon observe why). Yet she was the BEST of the so-called ‘witnesses’ that the WC could dredge up.
So you can imagine the quality of the other paid-by-ZOG liars that the WC did NOT include in their final report.
49:00-52:30 – This relates to the claim that Oswald, on the day of the assassination, was alleged to be carrying something like ‘curtain rods’ (which the WC claimed was his Carcano rifle).
But witnesses that saw him that day say he was carrying NO SUCH THING that looked like a rifle or curtain rods.
Also, this section mentions the threats from Dallas police to Mrs Acquilla Clemons to STFU about what she saw in the J.D Tippit murder.
Summary: Only a ZOG stooge would believe, for even one second, that Lee Harvey Oswald shot either JFK or Tippit.
I’m calling you out Mr Haslum as a HABITUAL LIAR.
If Carcanos were used decades after Kennedy’s murder they must have been fairly good rifles no? Not incapable of hitting a target 265 fee away?
You need to keep straight who you’re arguing with and what about. I haven’t made any comments claiming the rifle wasn’t ‘good’ (the opposite in fact)
The ammunition was intended for Greece and Albania not N Africa. Military supplies are stolen from the factory all along th way to their final destination
It doesn’t matter. It was a Gov order (that was the point) that’s it, just that. Maybe you should take a weekend off because you can’t even keep straight who you’re arguing with over what. Go outside.
Why was he wrong? All the celebrities and the rich were given Ivermectin when they got sick with covid. As was Trump. Joe Rogan's sin that required deplatforming (failed, but it was attempted) was that he told the little people about getting Ivermectin. It was supposed to be a secret cure available only to the rich and connected. The poors were supposed to stay sick with the virus and go to the nearest hospital for euthanasia if they got really sick. That's how they were trying to direct the evolution of the virus into something as harmless as the common cold.Replies: @Alden
As for Joe Rogan, I’ve actually seen a fair bit of what he had to say during the Covid Psyop.
I saw how he said he got Covid, felt under the weather for a day or so, but after taking Ivermectin he recovered to 100% good health.
WHY is he wrong to say that?
�
We bought our ivermectin from a vet supply house in Maryland horse country It was very cheap on Amazon no prescription needed.
Taking off his jacket was part of Oswald playing spy and assassin. Take off a jacket and the police won’t stop me.
Ask Google how many 10 to 12 or 10 to 16 year old kids were charged not convicted but just charged with murder in New York City in 1952 1953 when Oswald lived there.