This is like high school drama at this point.

Putting time between yourself and that two and half year period where you were wrong about everything should be your goal at this point.

More chanting by St. Mueller’s altar boy:

“In a bit of bitter irony, the statute that the House Democrats now claim Barr violated is the same obstruction of justice statute that Mueller says the president violated — engaging in deceptive or diversionary behavior for a corrupt purpose in order to impede a government investigation or inquiry.”

So now the Establishment has moved onto a supposed process crime to cover up another supposed process crime to impede a farce based on a false premise that Russia contaminated what Freedom Watcher has in a previous column called the “American marketplaces of ideas”?

Having sold out and/or undertaken revenge for being left off the Next Ninth Robe list in November 2017, Mr. Napolitano is now a tool for use on the fools. On this website, he’s merely a pinata.

One thing we agree on: Barr botched the whole thing. His appointment is another indication that Trump is just not competent for the job he holds.

Now you mention conspiracy, implying criminality.

What law exactly would have been broken if Trump had received dirt on Clinton and used it?

We’re looking at a fight between a skunk and a polecat. The Dems have proven themselves to be the more morally despicable of the two, because they know better.

The Democrats are too ugly and hateful to win a presidential election. Even against Trump. And they are dangerously close to being exposed as criminals and traitors. And they hold Barr in Contempt? I recommend that they kill themselves.

Here is the backstory.

Now I know why he calls it the backstory. He pulls it out of his ass.

I’m looking forward to reading the full unredacted Mueller report myself. As I’m in no hurry I will wait until it arrives at my local bookstore. Until then I’ll be sure to keep a close eye on the Fantasy Fiction section, where I’m sure it will be filed.

For a year now, for every Napolitano post, I just read the comments. There’s no point in reading what he writes, because all of it is pure garbage.

I do like reading the comments though.

Now I know why he calls it the backstory. He pulls it out of his ass.

Nappy should start saying “here is my backside story”.

You can’t obstruct if there was no crime to begin with.

I’ve always said that what we need to get rid of the swamp is a Elliot Ness in the WH.
Therefore I vote for Mueller for President.

“You can’t obstruct if there was no crime to begin with.”

Yes, you can, which is not to say that Trump did. If Trump were to fire the special prosecutor in an effort to stop the investigation, that would be obstruction whether the investigation would have revealed a crime or not. Stopping the investigation itself is obstruction, regardless of whether or not a crime occurred.

If, however, he fired the special prosecutor in order to assure that he was replaced with one who did not have a conflict of interest, that would not be obstruction because he was not trying to stop the investigation, he was trying to preserve the integrity of the investigation.

In any case, Trump did not fire the special prosecutor. He did discuss doing so, but only because he was convinced that Mueller was not impartial, which was absolutely correct. Merely discussing firing the special prosecutor, in any case and regardless of reason, is not obstruction.

If the government has criminalized “engaging in deceptive or diversionary behavior for a corrupt purpose in order to impede a government investigation or inquiry,� then the people live in a police state:

1. The victim of such a crime is the government.

2. The proof of such a crime must be found in the mind and heart of the person charged.

Mr. Napolitano not only condones this, but has been propagandizing since November 2017 for its application to the (deeply flawed, even faux) champion of dissident Americans. He is a statist and sycophant of the Establishment’s priestly (lawyer) class.

I am willing to bet more Americans are close followers of their local major-league baseball teams than are close followers of this whole endless, Mueller-related snoozefest.

Strange, I came to the same conclusion (no point in reading the columns) and made the same decision (do read the comments occasionally) at some point in late 2018.

It seems like the only one who deals in deception is the good judge. He claims there is no exoneration but is unable to identify a crime.

All he can do is produce a little Russian smoke and mirrors – much like Trump’s enemies.

It was obvious to me, that when Mueller included “Russian Meddling” in the title, that it was a political document designed to keep the narrative going for the Democrats and never Trumpers. As Bill Binney himself noted some time ago, Mueller had no interest in interviewing him about the “hack”. There is zero evidence of Russian meddling. There is, however, lots of speculation about Russian meddling. There may well have been Russian meddling, but it wasn’t where Mueller wanted to find it.

You have to admire his honesty.

Here is the backstory: Andrew Napolitano asked Trump to appoint him to the Supreme Court and his offer was refused. He has been attacking Trump ever since.

Lets see. Barr summarizes Two Volume 900 page Mueller report. One week later, entire 900 Mueller page report is released for everyone to read.

And the problem is…what?

The Mueller letter did not say that anything about the Barr letter was wrong. Mueller only said that Barr had not fully summarized the 400 page report. Yes, that is obvious. If you are not satisfied with the Barr letter, then go read the Mueller report.

What honesty?!?! He’s been a shill for the Deep State Repubocrat Party for over 2 years. Ex-judge Napolitano represents all that is corrupt (and more) in Washington, DC.

In a word: Yes.

Napolitano is a sad little cuck who has lost what little credibility he ever had. Trump should appoint him as an envoy to Fuckistan and be done with the dumb son of a bitch..

Trump is guilty of OOC

Obstruction

Of

Coup

There was no collusion was the conclusion about this huge confusion and yet the judge is under the illusion that a profusion of I said this, no you didn’t claims is of grave consequence

He is a silly man.

As the the shyster who was on OJ’s dream team, Alan Dershowitz, has pointed out, Trump had the constitutional authority to fire whomever he wanted whenever he wanted and men like the author here will just have to run for office and be elected if he wants to influence what is happening when it comes to policy

Trump IS The Executive and he does not require scrutiny by unelected tyrants like this irksome author because we can vote him in or out but we cannot vote the judge off of the washington island

This investigation was a scam and Mueller is a dirt bag who worked diligently to keep four innocent men in jail while he was head of the FBI office in Boston during the Whitey Bulger days

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/alan-dershowitz-mueller-political-zealot/2018/04/08/id/853235/

Mueller is a swamp monster

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/alan-dershowitz-mueller-political-zealot/2018/04/08/id/853235/

What is Napolitano talking about? Is he going nuts or has he always been so? How does Mueller expressing his opinion in a letter to Barr that Barr’s cursory statement was not to his liking have to do with Barr being aware of what “members of Mueller’s team” may have expressed to someone? So Napolitano is equating “members of Mueller’s team” to include Mueller and his letter? But in this sentence he differentiates: “What’s going on here? It is clear that Barr’s four-page letter, about which Mueller complained to Barr and some of Mueller’s team complained to the media, was a foolish attempt to sanitize the Mueller report. It was misleading, disingenuous and deceptive.” (All obviously Napolitano’s prejudiced opinion.) Was the question asked of Barr by a member of the subcommittee (name not mentioned ??) a set up between Mueller and Congress, and now Napolitano? Is Napolitano showing his true colors?

I think everyone knows that bitterness over not being nominated for a SCOTUS seat is cause for judge nappy’s weekly “back story” bile. I don’t think anyone takes him seriously anymore, so he might just want to hang it up and become a WalMart greeter.

This is a pathetic article. Note the following:

1. Turncoat Andrew DOES NOT quote the question asked of Barr, but quote’s Barr’s reply.

2. The 4 page summary Barr issued WAS REQUIRED BY LAW.

Nothing here from this columnist for over two weeks. Why?

Perhaps Ron Unz decided to stop paying for this crap

https://www.creators.com/author/judge-andrew-p-napolitano

Or that Mr. Napolitano pulled up stakes, which I had predicted. My guess is that Mr. Lang and Mr. Engelhardt did so, too. All three received substantially negative comments here.

If those assholes didn’t receive negative replies they wouldn’t have any replies at all.

And so it has come: June 4, 2019, and Mr. Napolitano is officially Archived.

Will Mr. Engelhardt be next down?

Judge Wop: “the DOJ is not in the business of exonerating”
The DOJ: “VA Exonerated In Medical Malpractice Lawsuit” https://www.justice.gov/usao-wdny/pr/va-exonerated-medical-malpractice-lawsuit

Liar.

Bingo!

Where has the asshole gone? Its like the comic page is missing from the newspaper.

Has Andrew been given the heave-ho as I haven’t seen any of his more recent anti-Trump screeds gracing UR?

Although I’d be surprised as Chairman/Proprietor Ron seems to relish having a diverse group of writers on his website!

Agree, three years of dysfunctional government, necessary good government stolen from the American people, we’re getting constant chaos, the ongoing destabilization offensive. And now Napolitano’s sophistry. What do we really have here, the 1% strata to the 5% are making a killing on the government’s subsidy of the Stock Market, and the super criminals who made off with $Trillions under the cover of 9/11 and the 2008 Financial Meltdown do not like the prospect of having to give it all back. In President Trump exists the threat of the reorganization of the Federal Reserve Bank, the US Treasury, and the Wall St. Monstrosity, where the High and Mighty will be losing their $power, $prerogatives, $privilege, everything. And so, as the MSM informs, people are really losing it.

I would appreciate someone defining the term’Russian agent’ What is a Russian agent? If I walk up to a Russian and engage in conversation, am I , or he/ she a Russian agent? Am I, or he/she a spy, a person of influence if we talk of business opportunities? All this is hysterics. Barr has every right to disregard what he considers to be hysterics and/or nonsense, as we all do. When I vote, am I guilty of meddling? If I have an opinion, am I guilty of meddling? Of course I am! Am I guilty of influencing? Of course I am; that is the whole point of voting, having an opinion, influencing. Mueller could find nothing that could be successfully prosecuted in court as a treasonous act, while the same is not true of hillary clinton, obama, and bill clinton. Our leaders have the responsibility of communicating with other nations, including Russia and China. Communications are important to avert war. If there was wrong doing, then present the evidence. It is as simple as that; evidence, not assertions.

Fred Reed and Napolitano, like good milk sitting in a fridge too long, have gone rancid. Especially the wop. Ain’t enough sugar in the world to cover up rotten.

[MORE]

Ron — Please don’t make the mistake of publishing anyone who has ever worked for Cux News. Thank You.

“I am willing to bet more Americans are close followers of their local major-league baseball teams than are close followers of this whole endless, Mueller-related snoozefest.”

Over two dozen investigations say that you are dead wrong.

Barr blatantly mischaracterized the Mueller report and is protecting Trump. That’s a major problem, my white friend.

I would hope for a thorough fact-checking of this article. I read Napolitano’s book “Dred Scott’s Revenge” and was horrified to see how carefully he cherry-picked his quotations, regardless of context, and cited discredited sources to bolster the bizarre anti-government premise of that screed.

Books like Napolitano’s, deliberate falsifications intended to deceive the uninformed, are the reason why book burnings are sometimes necessary.

He lost me at hack. Most Sanders supporters were well aware of the murder of Seth Rich and Assange’s implication in a European News interview that Rich leaked the Clinton emails to Wikileaks. Rich was a known Sanders supporter and an IT guy at the DNC.

Here is the video. Ask your self why you haven’t seen it and why Mueller never mentioned it.

Video Link

That’s an opinion. I am a retired attorney. Lawyers have opinions of other lawyer’s work all the time. It is part of the process. Every judicial opinion that might be of any precedential value and many that are not are scrutinized by other lawyers and often summarized succinctly.

I am no friend of Trump and have been a Democrat for most of my adulthood, but I am just sick of the Democratic party at this point. (I voted for Sanders in the primaries and voted Green in the general election for the first time). The Democrats lost 83.7% of the counties in this country in 2016. These urban elites seem to think that by winning the urban vote they can win the EC, and if they can’t, then what the hell, let’s impeach the President and have a silent coup.

That is what all of this smacks of. A silent coup. Where is the impeachable crime? Where is the high crime? Russiagate was totally bogus if you just listen to Assange who said the emails were leaked not hacked and implied that Seth Rich, a Sanders DNC IT guy, and Sanders supporter, and who was killed, was the leaker.

Video Link

Please recall that the AG is a member of “law enforcement”. Please recall that no less than the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that law enforcement is allowed to lie if they are investigating a crime (or, actually, at any time they so desire, as long as they claim . . .”. Recollect that members of Congress were and are involved in the ongoing coup attempt.

Q.F.E.D The Attorney General is not committing an illegal act if and when he lies to Congress. Or to anyone else.

Napolitano is almost certainly a disappointed job seeker.

“almost certainly” is a nice way of putting it.

Sad thing is, it is very common that our judgment, and our reasoning abilities, decline as we age.

Thank you, Pessimist, for kindly stating what could have been said in a more negative way.

Why is it that we are unable to investigate Mueller, Comey, Rosenstein, etc?

When Barr was testifying before a House subcommittee about his budgetary requests for the Department of Justice in the next fiscal year, he was asked by a member of the subcommittee if he knew anything about any criticisms by members of Mueller’s team about his four-page summary of Mueller’s conclusions. He replied, “No, I don’t.�

But of course, Barr did know because Mueller told him in his letter of the complaints his office had about the four-page letter.

One answer is that the letter isn’t necessarily a “criticism,” a fact which you can deduce based on Napolitano’s failure to quote it, or provide a link to it.

More fundamentally, this is some ultra-weak sauce even for a Level IV Trump Derangement sufferer like Napolitano. If this is what the Democrats are scraping from the bottom of the barrel, Barr is golden.

“Judge” Nap is actually embarrassing with this shtick he keeps pushing (like we are all stupid and don’t know Mueller was part of coup to overthrow the elected President)…and it’s actually also embarrassing that he doesn’t realize it.

“127 communications between Russian agents”

Compare this to the number of communications between congressmen with Israelis or Jews working on behalf of Israeli interests.

Israel and J-power have to be held to the same standard, and if not, then Russiagate is a joke.

Willful stupidity on Barr’s part.
Mole?

Oooo kaaaay

This op-ed by the good judge did not age well.

For “the rest of the story” on Mr. Mueller et al check out the indie reporter “Sundance” who blogs at Conservative Treehouse.

What is the matter with this man, Napolitano. He’s trying to call Barr a liar? Barr drips with integrity. If he said “no”, he had good reason to say “no”.

It’s ridiculous what Napolitano is saying. He is saying that Barr received a 4 page complaint about his memo, and then told Congress he did not receive any complaint about his memo.

Napolitano shows himself to be unjudicial. He shows himself, like Fauci, to be a political animal, and he just can’t rise above it.

Why the hell didn’t he call up Barr and ask him to clear any confusion Napolitano had in his mind, before he wrote this article. Coward.

And if Mueller found obstruction of justice, it was HIS DUTY to say that an indictment was warranted, and to make that recommendation explicitly. It was a political move on the part of Mueller. But Sidney Powell in her book, Licensed to Lie, gives us plenty of reasons to consider these people in Justice as criminals themselves. What the hell is the matter with Mueller choosing Weissman to be on his committee when books have been written about this man,and when he has been held in contempt by courts because of his criminal conduct in his prosecutions.

Here is the backstory: Andrew Napolitano asked Trump to appoint him to the Supreme Court and his offer was refused. He has been attacking Trump ever since.

You don’t know the difference between a request and an offer so why should I listen to you?

Moving on, Mr. Napolitano is a big fizzy douche and an attention whore. He may also safely be ignored.

Shut, up, traitor. You supported the Impeachment Hoax.

Go fuck yourself, you Deep State puppet hack.

well, understand that a lot of people no longer trust the process or the people being presented as candidates, as a direct result of all of this.

yeah, like the Russian millions Hillary and Clinton Foundation got from the Uranium One deal facilitated by Robert Mueller himself at least as the sample man if not a bagman, too.