');
The Unz Review •ï¿½An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library •ï¿½B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


�Remember My InformationWhy?
�Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Alastair Crooke Anatoly Karlin Andrew Anglin Andrew Joyce Audacious Epigone Boyd D. Cathey C.J. Hopkins E. Michael Jones Eric Margolis Eric Striker Fred Reed Gilad Atzmon Godfree Roberts Gregory Hood Guillaume Durocher Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir James Kirkpatrick James Thompson Jared Taylor John Derbyshire Jonathan Cook Jung-Freud Karlin Community Kevin Barrett Kevin MacDonald Lance Welton Larry Romanoff Laurent Guyénot Linh Dinh Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Kersey Pepe Escobar Peter Frost Philip Giraldi Razib Khan Ron Unz Steve Sailer The Saker Tobias Langdon Trevor Lynch A. Graham A. J. Smuskiewicz A Southerner Academic Research Group UK Staff Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Agha Hussain Ahmad Al Khaled Ahmet Öncü Alain De Benoist Alan Macleod Albemarle Man Alex Graham Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alexander Jacob Alexander Wolfheze Alfred McCoy Alison Weir Allan Wall Allegra Harpootlian Amalric De Droevig Ambrose Kane Amr Abozeid Anand Gopal Anastasia Katz Andre Damon Andre Vltchek Andreas Canetti Andrei Martyanov Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andrew Hamilton Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Napolitano Andrew S. Fischer Andy Kroll Angie Saxon Ann Jones Anna Tolstoyevskaya Anne Wilson Smith Anonymous Anonymous American Anonymous Attorney Anonymous Occidental Anthony Boehm Anthony Bryan Anthony DiMaggio Tony Hall Antiwar Staff Antonius Aquinas Antony C. Black Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor AudaciousEpigone Augustin Goland Austen Layard Ava Muhammad Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Kissin Barry Lando Barton Cockey Beau Albrecht Belle Chesler Ben Fountain Ben Freeman Ben Sullivan Benjamin Villaroel Bernard M. Smith Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Blake Archer Williams Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Book Brad Griffin Bradley Moore Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brett Wilkins Brian Dew Brian McGlinchey Brian R. Wright Brittany Smith C.D. Corax Cara Marianna Carl Boggs Carl Horowitz Carolyn Yeager Cat McGuire Catherine Crump César Keller Chalmers Johnson Chanda Chisala Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlie O'Neill Charlottesville Survivor Chase Madar Chauke Stephan Filho Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Chris Woltermann Christian Appy Christophe Dolbeau Christopher DeGroot Christopher Donovan Christopher Ketcham Chuck Spinney Civus Non Nequissimus CODOH Editors Coleen Rowley Colin Liddell Cooper Sterling Craig Murray Cynthia Chung D.F. Mulder Dahr Jamail Dakota Witness Dan E. Phillips Dan Sanchez Daniel Barge Daniel McAdams Daniel Moscardi Daniel Vinyard Danny Sjursen Dave Chambers Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Boyajian David Bromwich David Chibo David Chu David Gordon David Haggith David Irving David L. McNaron David Lorimer David Martin David North David Stockman David Vine David Walsh David William Pear David Yorkshire Dean Baker Declan Hayes Dennis Dale Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Diego Ramos Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Dmitriy Kalyagin Donald Thoresen Alan Sabrosky Dr. Ejaz Akram Dr. Ridgely Abdul Mu’min Muhammad Dries Van Langenhove Eamonn Fingleton Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Edward Curtin Edward Dutton Egbert Dijkstra Egor Kholmogorov Ehud Shapiro Ekaterina Blinova Ellen Brown Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Emil Kirkegaard Emilio García Gómez Emma Goldman Enzo Porter Eric Draitser Eric Paulson Eric Peters Eric Rasmusen Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Gant Eugene Girin Eugene Kusmiak Eve Mykytyn F. Roger Devlin Fadi Abu Shammalah Fantine Gardinier Federale Fenster Fergus Hodgson Finian Cunningham The First Millennium Revisionist Fordham T. Smith Former Agent Forum Francis Goumain Frank Tipler Franklin Lamb Franklin Stahl Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Gary Corseri Gary Heavin Gary North Gary Younge Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Galloway George Koo George Mackenzie George Szamuely Georgianne Nienaber Gilbert Cavanaugh Gilbert Doctorow Giles Corey Glen K. Allen Glenn Greenwald A. Beaujean Agnostic Alex B. Amnestic Arcane Asher Bb Bbartlog Ben G Birch Barlow Canton ChairmanK Chrisg Coffee Mug Darth Quixote David David B David Boxenhorn DavidB Diana Dkane DMI Dobeln Duende Dylan Ericlien Fly Gcochran Godless Grady Herrick Jake & Kara Jason Collins Jason Malloy Jason�s Jeet Jemima Joel John Emerson John Quiggin JP Kele Kjmtchl Mark Martin Matoko Kusanagi Matt Matt McIntosh Michael Vassar Miko Ml Ole P-ter Piccolino Rosko Schizmatic Scorpius Suman TangoMan The Theresa Thorfinn Thrasymachus Wintz Gonzalo Lira Graham Seibert Grant M. Dahl Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Greg Klein Gregg Stanley Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Conte Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Gunnar Alfredsson Gustavo Arellano Hank Johnson Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Hans Vogel Harri Honkanen Heiner Rindermann Henry Cockburn Hewitt E. Moore Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Howe Abbot-Hiss Hua Bin Hubert Collins Hugh Kennedy Hugh McInnish Hugh Moriarty Hugo Dionísio Hunter DeRensis Hunter Wallace Huntley Haverstock Ian Fantom Igor Shafarevich Ira Chernus Ivan Kesić J. Alfred Powell J.B. Clark J.D. Gore J. Ricardo Martins Jacek Szela Jack Antonio Jack Dalton Jack Kerwick Jack Krak Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen Jake Bowyer James Bovard James Carroll James Carson Harrington James Chang James Dunphy James Durso James Edwards James Fulford James Gillespie James Hanna James J. O'Meara James K. Galbraith James Karlsson James Lawrence James Petras Jane Lazarre Jane Weir Janice Kortkamp Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Cannon Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jayant Bhandari JayMan Jean Bricmont Jean Marois Jean Ranc Jef Costello Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey D. Sachs Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jesse Mossman JHR Writers Jim Daniel Jim Fetzer Jim Goad Jim Kavanagh Jim Smith JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Dackman Joe Lauria Joel S. Hirschhorn Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Harrison Sims John Helmer John Hill John Huss John J. Mearsheimer John Jackson John Kiriakou John Macdonald John Morgan John Patterson John Leonard John Pilger John Q. Publius John Rand John Reid John Ryan John Scales Avery John Siman John Stauber John T. Kelly John Taylor John Titus John Tremain John V. Walsh John Wear John Williams Jon Else Jon Entine Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Revusky Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Sawyer Jonathan Schell Jordan Henderson Jordan Steiner Jose Alberto Nino Joseph Kay Joseph Kishore Joseph Sobran Josephus Tiberius Josh Neal Jeshurun Tsarfat Juan Cole Judith Coburn Julian Bradford Julian Macfarlane K.J. Noh Kacey Gunther Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Karl Haemers Karl Nemmersdorf Karl Thorburn Kees Van Der Pijl Keith Woods Kelley Vlahos Kenn Gividen Kenneth Vinther Kerry Bolton Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin Michael Grace Kevin Rothrock Kevin Sullivan Kevin Zeese Kshama Sawant Larry C. Johnson Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Lawrence Erickson Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Leonard C. Goodman Leonard R. Jaffee Liam Cosgrove Lidia Misnik Lilith Powell Linda Preston Lipton Matthews Liv Heide Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett Louis Farrakhan Lydia Brimelow M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maciej Pieczyński Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marco De Wit Marcus Alethia Marcus Apostate Marcus Cicero Marcus Devonshire Margaret Flowers Margot Metroland Marian Evans Mark Allen Mark Bratchikov-Pogrebisskiy Mark Crispin Miller Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Gullick Mark H. Gaffney Mark Lu Mark Perry Mark Weber Marshall Yeats Martin Jay Martin K. O'Toole Martin Webster Martin Witkerk Mary Phagan-Kean Matt Cockerill Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Caldwell Matthew Ehret Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max Jones Max North Max Parry Max West Maya Schenwar Merlin Miller Metallicman Michael A. Roberts Michael Averko Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Hoffman Michael Masterson Michael Quinn Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Michelle Malkin Miko Peled Mnar Muhawesh Moon Landing Skeptic Morgan Jones Morris V. De Camp Mr. Anti-Humbug Muhammed Abu Murray Polner N. Joseph Potts Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Nathan Cofnas Nathan Doyle Ned Stark Neil Kumar Nelson Rosit Niall McCrae Nicholas R. Jeelvy Nicholas Stix Nick Griffin Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Nicolás Palacios Navarro Nils Van Der Vegte Noam Chomsky NOI Research Group Nomi Prins Norman Finkelstein Norman Solomon OldMicrobiologist Oliver Boyd-Barrett Oliver Williams Oscar Grau P.J. Collins Pádraic O'Bannon Patrice Greanville Patrick Armstrong Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Patrick Lawrence Patrick Martin Patrick McDermott Patrick Whittle Paul Bennett Paul Cochrane Paul De Rooij Paul Edwards Paul Engler Paul Gottfried Paul Larudee Paul Mitchell Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Paul Souvestre Paul Tripp Pedro De Alvarado Peter Baggins Ph.D. Peter Bradley Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Lee Peter Van Buren Philip Kraske Philip Weiss Pierre M. Sprey Pierre Simon Povl H. Riis-Knudsen Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Qasem Soleimani Rachel Marsden Raches Radhika Desai Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ralph Raico Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Ramzy Baroud Randy Shields Raul Diego Ray McGovern Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Reginald De Chantillon Rémi Tremblay Rev. Matthew Littlefield Ricardo Duchesne Richard Cook Richard Falk Richard Foley Richard Galustian Richard Houck Richard Hugus Richard Knight Richard Krushnic Richard McCulloch Richard Silverstein Richard Solomon Rick Shenkman Rick Sterling Rita Rozhkova Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Debrus Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Fisk Robert Hampton Robert Henderson Robert Inlakesh Robert LaFlamme Robert Lindsay Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Stark Robert Stevens Robert Trivers Robert Wallace Robert Weissberg Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Rolo Slavskiy Romana Rubeo Romanized Visigoth Ron Paul Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning RT Staff Ruuben Kaalep Ryan Andrews Ryan Dawson Sabri Öncü Salim Mansur Sam Dickson Sam Francis Sam Husseini Sayed Hasan Scot Olmstead Scott Howard Scott Locklin Scott Ritter Servando Gonzalez Sharmine Narwani Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Sidney James Sietze Bosman Sigurd Kristensen Sinclair Jenkins Southfront Editor Spencer Davenport Spencer J. Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen F. Cohen Stephen J. Rossi Stephen J. Sniegoski Stephen Paul Foster Sterling Anderson Steve Fraser Steve Keen Steve Penfield Steven Farron Steven Yates Subhankar Banerjee Susan Southard Sydney Schanberg Talia Mullin Tanya Golash-Boza Taxi Taylor McClain Taylor Young Ted O'Keefe Ted Rall The Crew The Zman Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas A. Fudge Thomas Anderson Thomas Hales Thomas Dalton Thomas Ertl Thomas Frank Thomas Hales Thomas Jackson Thomas O. Meehan Thomas Steuben Thomas Zaja Thorsten J. Pattberg Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Timothy Vorgenss Timur Fomenko Tingba Muhammad Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Engelhardt Tom Mysiewicz Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Torin Murphy Tracy Rosenberg Travis LeBlanc Vernon Thorpe Virginia Dare Vito Klein Vladimir Brovkin Vladimir Putin Vladislav Krasnov Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walt King Walter E. Block Warren Balogh Washington Watcher Washington Watcher II Wayne Allensworth Wei Ling Chua Wesley Muhammad White Man Faculty Whitney Webb Wilhelm Kriessmann Wilhem Ivorsson Will Jones Will Offensicht William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Wyatt Peterson Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen Yaroslav Podvolotskiy Yvonne Lorenzo Zhores Medvedev
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2020 Election Academia American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Benjamin Netanyahu Black Crime Black Lives Matter Blacks Britain Censorship China China/America Conspiracy Theories Covid Culture/Society Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy Gaza Hamas History Holocaust Ideology Immigration IQ Iran Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Joe Biden NATO Nazi Germany Neocons Open Thread Political Correctness Race/Ethnicity Russia Science Syria Ukraine Vladimir Putin World War II 汪精衛 100% Jussie-free Content 1984 2008 Election 2012 Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2022 Election 2024 Election 23andMe 9/11 9/11 Commission Report Abortion Abraham Lincoln Abu Mehdi Muhandas Achievement Gap ACLU Acting White Adam Schiff Addiction ADL Admin Administration Admixture Adolf Hitler Advertising AfD Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Age Age Of Malthusian Industrialism Agriculture AI AIPAC Air Force Aircraft Carriers Airlines Airports Al Jazeera Al Qaeda Al-Shifa Alain Soral Alan Clemmons Alan Dershowitz Albania Albert Einstein Albion's Seed Alcoholism Alejandro Mayorkas Alex Jones Alexander Dugin Alexander Vindman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Alexei Navalny Algeria Ali Dawabsheh Alien And Sedition Acts Alison Nathan Alt Right Altruism Amazon Amazon.com America America First American Civil War American Dream American History American Indians American Israel Public Affairs Committee American Jews American Left American Nations American Presidents American Prisons American Renaissance Amerindians Amish Amnesty Amnesty International Amos Hochstein Amy Klobuchar Amygdala Anarchism Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Greece Ancient Rome Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Bacevich Andrew Sullivan Andrew Yang Anglo-America Anglo-imperialism Anglo-Saxons Anglos Anglosphere Angola Animal IQ Animal Rights Wackos Animals Ann Coulter Anne Frank Anthony Blinken Anthony Fauci Anthrax Anthropology Anti-Defamation League Anti-Gentilism Anti-Semites Anti-Vaccination Anti-Vaxx Anti-white Animus Antifa Antifeminism Antiracism Antisemitism Antisemitism Awareness Act Antisocial Behavior Antizionism Antony Blinken Apartheid Apartheid Israel Apollo's Ascent Appalachia Apple Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaeogenetics Archaeology Archaic DNA Architecture Arctic Arctic Sea Ice Melting Argentina Ariel Sharon Armageddon War Armenia Armenian Genocide Army Arnold Schwarzenegger Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Jensen Arthur Lichte Artificial Intelligence Arts/Letters Aryan Invasion Theory Aryans Aryeh Lightstone Ash Carter Ashkenazi Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians Assassination Assassinations Assimilation Atheism Atlanta AUMF Auschwitz Australia Australian Aboriginals Autism Automation Avril Haines Ayn Rand Azerbaijan Azov Brigade Babes And Hunks Baby Gap Balfour Declaration Balkans Balochistan Baltics Baltimore Riots Banjamin Netanyahu Banking Industry Banking System Banks #BanTheADL Barack Obama Baseball Statistics Bashar Al-Assad Basketball #BasketOfDeplorables BBC BDS BDS Movement Beauty Beethoven Behavior Genetics Behavioral Genetics Bela Belarus Belgium Belgrade Embassy Bombing Ben Cardin Ben Hodges Ben Rhodes Ben Shapiro Ben Stiller Benny Gantz Bernard Henri-Levy Bernie Sanders Betsy DeVos Betty McCollum Bezalel Smotrich Bezalel Yoel Smotrich Biden BigPost Bilateral Relations Bilingual Education Bill Clinton Bill De Blasio Bill Gates Bill Kristol Bill Maher Bill Of Rights Billionaires Billy Graham Bioethics Biology Bioweapons Birmingham Birth Rate Bitcoin Black Community Black History Month Black Muslims Black Panthers Black People Black Slavery BlackLivesMatter BlackRock Blake Masters Blank Slatism BLM Blog Blogging Blogosphere Blond Hair Blood Libel Blue Eyes Boasian Anthropology Boeing Boers Bolshevik Revolution Bolshevik Russia Books Boomers Border Wall Boris Johnson Bosnia Boycott Divest And Sanction Brain Drain Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Bret Stephens Brett McGurk Bretton Woods Brexit Brezhnev Bri Brian Mast BRICs Brighter Brains British Empire British Labour Party British Politics Buddhism Build The Wall Bulldog Bush Business Byzantine Caitlin Johnstone California Californication Camp Of The Saints Canada Cancer Candace Owens Capitalism Carl Von Clausewitz Carlos Slim Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Cars Carthaginians Catalonia Catholic Church Catholicism Catholics Cats Caucasus CDC Ceasefire Cecil Rhodes Census Central Asia Central Intelligence Agency Chanda Chisala Chaos And Order Charles De Gaulle Charles Manson Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charlie Hebdo Charlottesville Checheniest Chechen Of Them All Chechens Chechnya Chernobyl Chetty Chicago Chicagoization Chicken Hut Child Abuse Children Chile China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese IQ Chinese Language Christian Zionists Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Christopher Wray Chuck Schumer CIA Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil Rights Movement Civil War Civilization Clannishness Clash Of Civilizations Class Classical Antiquity Classical History Classical Music Clayton County Climate Climate Change Clint Eastwood Clintons Coal Coalition Of The Fringes Cognitive Elitism Cognitive Science Cold Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Powell Colin Woodard College Admission College Football Colonialism Color Revolution Columbia University Columbus Comic Books Communism Computers Confederacy Confederate Flag Congress Conquistador-American Conservatism Conservative Movement Conservatives Conspiracy Theory Constantinople Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumerism Controversial Book Convergence Core Article Corona Corporatism Corruption COTW Counterpunch Country Music Cousin Marriage Cover Story COVID-19 Craig Murray Creationism Crime Crimea Crispr Critical Race Theory Cruise Missiles Crusades Crying Among The Farmland Cryptocurrency Ctrl-Left Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckery Cuckservatism Cuckservative CUFI Cuisine Cultural Marxism Cultural Revolution Culture Culture War Curfew Czars Czech Republic DACA Daily Data Dump Dallas Shooting Damnatio Memoriae Dan Bilzarian Danny Danon Daren Acemoglu Darwinism Darya Dugina Data Data Analysis Dave Chappelle David Bazelon David Brog David Friedman David Frum David Irving David Lynch David Petraeus Davide Piffer Davos Death Of The West Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Deborah Lipstadt Debt Debt Jubilee Decadence Deep State Deficits Degeneracy Democracy Democratic Party Demograhics Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denmark Dennis Ross Department Of Homeland Security Deplatforming Derek Chauvin Detroit Development Dick Cheney Diet Digital Yuan Dinesh D'Souza Discrimination Disease Disinformation Disney Disparate Impact Dissent Dissidence Diversity Diversity Before Diversity Diversity Pokemon Points Divorce DNA Dogs Dollar Domestic Surveillance Domestic Terrorism Doomsday Clock Dostoevsky Doug Emhoff Doug Feith Dresden Drone War Drones Drug Laws Drugs Duterte Dysgenic Dystopia E. Michael Jones E. O. Wilson East Asia East Asian Exception East Asians East Turkestan Eastern Europe Ebrahim Raisi Economic Development Economic History Economic Sanctions Economy Ecuador Edmund Burke Edmund Burke Foundation Education Edward Snowden Effective Altruism Effortpost Efraim Zurofff Egor Kholmogorov Egypt Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2020 Election Fraud Elections Electric Cars Eli Rosenbaum Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elise Stefanik Elites Elizabeth Holmes Elizabeth Warren Elliot Abrams Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emmanuel Macron Emmett Till Employment Energy England Entertainment Environment Environmentalism Epidemiology Equality Erdogan Eretz Israel Eric Zemmour Ernest Hemingway Espionage Espionage Act Estonia Ethics Ethics And Morals Ethiopia Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity Ethnocentricty EU Eugene Debs Eugenics Eurabia Eurasia Euro Europe European Genetics European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Genetics Evolutionary Psychology Existential Risks Eye Color Face Shape Facebook Faces Fake News False Flag Attack Family Family Systems Fantasy FARA Farmers Fascism Fast Food FBI FDA FDD Federal Reserve Feminism Ferguson Ferguson Shooting Fermi Paradox Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates FIFA Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Finland Finn Baiting Finns First Amendment FISA Fitness Flash Mobs Flight From White Floyd Riots 2020 Fluctuarius Argenteus Flynn Effect Food Football For Fun Forecasts Foreign Agents Registration Act Foreign Policy Fourth Amendment Fox News France Francesca Albanese Frank Salter Frankfurt School Franklin D. Roosevelt Franz Boas Fraud Freakonomics Fred Kagan Free Market Free Speech Free Trade Freedom Of Speech Freedom French Revolution Friedrich Karl Berger Friends Of The Israel Defense Forces Frivolty Frontlash Furkan Dogan Future Futurism G20 Gambling Game Game Of Thrones Gavin McInnes Gavin Newsom Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians GDP Gen Z Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Equality Gender Reassignment Gene-Culture Coevolution Genealogy General Intelligence General Motors Generation Z Generational Gap Genes Genetic Diversity Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Genghis Khan Genocide Genocide Convention Genomics Gentrification Geography Geopolitics George Floyd George Galloway George Patton George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush Georgia Germans Germany Ghislaine Maxwell Gilad Atzmon Gina Peddy Giorgia Meloni Gladwell Glenn Greenwald Global Warming Globalism Globalization Globo-Homo God Gold Golf Gonzalo Lira Google Government Government Debt Government Overreach Government Spending Government Surveillance Government Waste Goyim Grant Smith Graphs Great Bifurcation Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Powers Great Replacement #GreatWhiteDefendantPrivilege Greece Greeks Greenland Greg Cochran Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Greta Thunberg Grooming Group Intelligence Group Selection GSS Guardian Guest Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns Guy Swan GWAS Gypsies H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Haiti Hajnal Line Halloween HammerHate Hannibal Procedure Happening Happiness Harvard Harvard University Harvey Weinstein Hassan Nasrallah Hate Crimes Fraud Hoax Hate Hoaxes Hate Speech Hbd Hbd Chick Health Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Hegira Height Henry Harpending Henry Kissinger Hereditary Heredity Heritability Hezbollah High Speed Rail Hillary Clinton Hindu Caste System Hindus Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanics Historical Genetics History Of Science Hitler HIV/AIDS Hoax Holland Hollywood Holocaust Denial Holocaust Deniers Holy Roman Empire Homelessness Homicide Homicide Rate Homomania Homosexuality Hong Kong Houellebecq Housing Houthis Howard Kohr Huawei Hubbert's Peak Huddled Masses Huey Newton Hug Thug Human Achievement Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Evolutionary Genetics Human Evolutionary Genomics Human Genetics Human Genomics Human Rights Human Rights Watch Humor Hungary Hunt For The Great White Defendant Hunter Biden Hunter-Gatherers I.F. Stone I.Q. I.Q. Genomics #IBelieveInHavenMonahan ICC Icj Ideas Identity Ideology And Worldview IDF Idiocracy Igbo Igor Shafarevich Ilan Pappe Ilhan Omar Illegal Immigration Ilyushin IMF Impeachment Imperialism Imran Awan Inbreeding Income India Indian Indian IQ Indians Individualism Indo-Europeans Indonesia Inequality Inflation Intelligence Intelligence Agencies Intelligent Design International International Affairs International Comparisons International Court Of Justice International Criminal Court International Relations Internet Interracial Marriage Interracism Intersectionality Intifada Intra-Racism Intraracism Invade Invite In Hock Invade The World Invite The World Iosef Stalin Iosif Stalin Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iranian Nuclear Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Irish Is Love Colorblind Isaac Herzog ISIS Islam Islamic Jihad Islamic State Islamism Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Bonds Israel Defense Force Israel Defense Forces Israel Separation Wall Israeli Occupation IT Italy Itamar Ben-Gvir It's Okay To Be White Ivanka Ivy League J Street Jacky Rosen Jair Bolsonaro Jake Sullivan Jake Tapper Jamal Khashoggi James Angleton James B. Watson James Clapper James Comey James Forrestal James Jeffrey James Mattis James Watson Janet Yellen Janice Yellen Japan Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Greenblatt JASTA JCPOA JD Vance Jeb Bush Jeffrey Epstein Jeffrey Goldberg Jeffrey Sachs Jen Psaki Jennifer Rubin Jens Stoltenberg Jeremy Corbyn Jerry Seinfeld Jerusalem Jerusalem Post Jesuits Jesus Jesus Christ Jewish Genetics Jewish History Jewish Intellectuals Jewish Power Jewish Power Party Jewish Supremacism JFK Assassination JFK Jr. Jihadis Jill Stein Jimmy Carter Jingoism JINSA Joe Lieberman Joe Rogan John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John F. Kennedy John Hagee John Hawks John Kirby John Kiriakou John McCain John McLaughlin John Mearsheimer Joker Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Greenblatt Jonathan Pollard Jordan Peterson Joseph McCarthy Josh Gottheimer Josh Paul Journalism Judaism Judea Judge George Daniels Judicial System Julian Assange Jussie Smollett Justice Justin Trudeau Kaboom Kahanists Kaiser Wilhelm Kamala Harris Kamala On Her Knees Kanye West Karabakh War 2020 Karen Kwiatkowski Karine Jean-Pierre Kashmir Kata'ib Hezbollah Kay Bailey Hutchison Kazakhstan Keir Starmer Kenneth Marcus Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Williamson Khazars Khrushchev Kids Kim Jong Un Kinship Kkk KKKrazy Glue Of The Coalition Of The Fringes Knesset Kompromat Korea Korean War Kosovo Kris Kobach Kristi Noem Ku Klux Klan Kubrick Kurds Kushner Foundation Kyle Rittenhouse Kyrie Irving Language Laos Larry C. Johnson Late Obama Age Collapse Latin America Latinos Laura Loomer Law Lawfare LDNR Lead Poisoning Leahy Amendments Leahy Law Lebanon Lee Kuan Yew Leftism Lenin Leo Frank Leo Strauss Let's Talk About My Hair LGBT LGBTI Liberal Opposition Liberal Whites Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libya Light Skin Preference Lindsey Graham Linguistics Literacy Literature Lithuania Litvinenko Living Standards Liz Cheney Liz Truss Lloyd Austin Localism long-range-missile-defense Longevity Looting Lord Of The Rings Lorde Los Angeles Loudoun County Louis Farrakhan Love And Marriage Low-fat Lukashenko Lula Lyndon B Johnson Lyndon Johnson Madeleine Albright Mafia MAGA Magnitsky Act Malaysia Malaysian Airlines MH17 Manosphere Manufacturing Mao Zedong Map Marco Rubio Maria Butina Marijuana Marine Le Pen Marjorie Taylor Greene Mark Milley Mark Steyn Mark Warner Marriage Martin Luther King Martin Scorsese Marvel Marx Marxism Masculinity Mass Shootings Mate Choice Mathematics Mathilde Krim Matt Gaetz Max Boot Max Weber Maxine Waters Mayans McCain McCain/POW McDonald's Meat Media Media Bias Medicine Medieval Christianity Medieval Russia Mediterranean Diet Medvedev Megan McCain Meghan Markle Mein Obama MEK Mel Gibson Men With Gold Chains Meng Wanzhou Mental Health Mental Illness Mental Traits Meritocracy Merkel Merkel Youth Merkel's Boner Merrick Garland Mexico MH 17 MI-6 Michael Bloomberg Michael Collins PIper Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Michael Jackson Michael Lind Michael McFaul Michael Moore Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michelle Goldberg Michelle Ma Belle Michelle Obama Microaggressions Middle Ages Middle East Migration Mike Huckabee Mike Johnson Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mike Waltz Mikhael Gorbachev Miles Mathis Militarized Police Military Military Analysis Military Budget Military History Military Spending Military Technology Millennials Milner Group Minimum Wage Minneapolis Minorities Miriam Adelson Miscellaneous Misdreavus Mishima Missile Defense Mitch McConnell Mitt Romney Mixed-Race MK-Ultra Mohammed Bin Salman Monarchy Mondoweiss Money Mongolia Mongols Monkeypox Monogamy Moon Landing Hoax Moon Landings Moore's Law Morality Mormonism Mormons Mortality Mortgage Moscow Mossad Movies Muhammad Multiculturalism Music Muslim Ban Muslims Mussolini NAEP Naftali Bennett Nakba NAMs Nancy Pelos Nancy Pelosi Narendra Modi NASA Nation Of Hate Nation Of Islam National Assessment Of Educational Progress National Debt National Endowment For Democracy National Review National Security Strategy National Socialism National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans Natural Gas Nature Vs. Nurture Navalny Affair Navy Standards Nazis Nazism Neandertals Neanderthals Near Abroad Negrolatry Nehru Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolibs Neolithic Neoreaction Netherlands Never Again Education Act New Cold War New Dark Age New Horizon Foundation New Orleans New Silk Road New Tes New World Order New York New York City New York Times New Zealand New Zealand Shooting NFL Nicholas II Nicholas Wade Nick Eberstadt Nick Fuentes Nicolas Maduro Niger Nigeria Nike Nikki Haley NIMBY Nina Jankowicz No Fly Zone Noam Chomsky Nobel Prize Nord Stream Nord Stream Pipelines Nordics Norman Braman Norman Finkelstein Norman Lear North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway Novorossiya NSA NSO Group Nuclear Power Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Nuremberg Nutrition NYPD Obama Obama Presidency Obamacare Obesity Obituary Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Wall Street October Surprise Oedipus Complex OFAC Oil Oil Industry Oklahoma City Bombing Olav Scholz Old Testament Oliver Stone Olympics Open Borders OpenThread Opinion Poll Opioids Orban Organized Crime Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Orwell Osama Bin Laden OTFI Our Soldiers Speak Out Of Africa Model Paganism Pakistan Pakistani Paleoanthropology Paleocons Palestine Palestinians Palin Panhandling Papacy Paper Review Parasite Burden Parenting Parenting Paris Attacks Partly Inbred Extended Family Pat Buchanan Pathogens Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Findley Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Durov Pavel Grudinin Paypal Peace Peak Oil Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Pentagon Personal Genomics Personality Pete Buttgieg Pete Hegseth Peter Frost Peter Thiel Peter Turchin Petro Poroshenko Pew Phil Rushton Philadelphia Philippines Philosophy Phoenicians Phyllis Randall Physiognomy Piers Morgan Pigmentation Pigs Pioneers Piracy PISA Pizzagate POC Ascendancy Podcast Poland Police Police State Polio Political Correctness Makes You Stupid Political Dissolution Political Economy Politicians Politics Polling Pollution Polygamy Polygyny Pope Francis Population Population Genetics Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Porn Pornography Portland Portugal Portuguese Post-Apocalypse Poverty Power Pramila Jayapal PRC Prediction Prescription Drugs President Joe Biden Presidential Race '08 Presidential Race '12 Presidential Race '16 Presidential Race '20 Prince Andrew Prince Harry Priti Patel Privacy Privatization Progressives Propaganda Prostitution protest Protestantism Proud Boys Psychology Psychometrics Psychopathy Public Health Public Schools Puerto Rico Puritans Putin Putin Derangement Syndrome QAnon Qassem Soleimani Qatar Quantitative Genetics Quebec Quiet Skies Quincy Institute R2P Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race/IQ Race Riots Rachel Corrie Racial Purism Racial Reality Racialism Racism Rafah Raj Shah Rand Paul Randy Fine Rap Music Rape Rashida Tlaib Rationality Ray McGovern Raymond Chandler Razib Khan Real Estate RealWorld Recep Tayyip Erdogan Red Sea Refugee Crisis #refugeeswelcome Religion Religion And Philosophy Rentier Reparations Reprint Republican Party Republicans Review Revisionism Rex Tillerson RFK Assassination Ricci Richard Dawkins Richard Goldberg Richard Grenell Richard Haas Richard Haass Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Rightwing Cinema Riots R/k Theory RMAX Robert A. Heinlein Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Ford Robert Kagan Robert Kraft Robert Maxwell Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert O'Brien Robert Reich Robots Rock Music Roe Vs. Wade Roger Waters Rolling Stone Roman Empire Romania Romanticism Rome Ron DeSantis Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rotherham Rothschilds RT International Rudy Giuliani Rush Limbaugh Russiagate Russian Demography Russian Elections 2018 Russian History Russian Media Russian Military Russian Nationalism Russian Occupation Government Russian Orthodox Church Russian Reaction Russians Russophobes Russophobia Russotriumph Ruth Bader Ginsburg Rwanda Sabrina Rubin Erdely Sacha Baron Cohen Sacklers Sailer Strategy Sailer's First Law Of Female Journalism Saint Peter Tear Down This Gate! Saint-Petersburg Salman Rushie Salt Sam Bankman-Fried Sam Francis Samantha Power Samson Option San Bernadino Massacre Sandra Beleza Sandy Hook Sapir-Whorf SAT Satanic Age Satanism Saudi Arabia Scandal Science Denialism Science Fiction Scooter Libby Scotland Scott Ritter Scrabble Sean Hannity Seattle Secession Self Determination Self Indulgence Semites Serbia Sergei Lavrov Sergei Skripal Sergey Glazyev Seth Rich Sex Sex Differences Sex Ratio At Birth Sexual Harassment Sexual Selection Sexuality Seymour Hersh Shai Masot Shakespeare Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Shared Environment Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shireen Abu Akleh Shmuley Boteach Shoah Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shulamit Aloni Shurat HaDin Sigal Mandelker Sigar Pearl Mandelker Sigmund Freud Silicon Valley Singapore Single Men Single Women Sinotriumph Six Day War Sixties SJWs Skin Color Slavery Slavery Reparations Slavoj Zizek Slavs Smart Fraction Social Justice Warriors Social Media Social Science Socialism Society Sociobiology Sociology Sodium Solzhenitsyn Somalia Sotomayor South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea Southeast Asia Soviet History Soviet Union Sovok Space Space Exploration Space Program Spain Spanish Spanish River High School SPLC Sport Sports Srebrenica St Petersburg International Economic Forum Stabby Somali Staffan Stage Stalinism Standardized Tests Star Trek Star Wars Starbucks Starvation Comparisons State Department Statistics Statue Of Liberty Steny Hoyer Stephen Cohen Stephen Harper Stephen Jay Gould Stephen Townsend Stereotypes Steroids Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steven Pinker Strait Of Hormuz Strategic Ambiguity Stuart Levey Stuart Seldowitz Student Debt Stuff White People Like Sub-replacement Fertility Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subhas Chandra Bose Subprime Mortgage Crisis Suburb Suella Braverman Sugar Suicide Superintelligence Supreme Court Surveillance Susan Glasser Svidomy Sweden Switzerland Symington Amendment Syrian Civil War Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Take Action Taliban Talmud Tatars Taxation Taxes Tea Party Technical Considerations Technology Ted Cruz Telegram Television Terrorism Terrorists Terry McAuliffe Tesla Testing Testosterone Tests Texas THAAD Thailand The 10/7 Project The AK The American Conservative The Bell Curve The Bible The Black Autumn The Cathedral The Confederacy The Constitution The Eight Banditos The Family The Free World The Great Awokening The Left The Middle East The New York Times The South The States The Zeroth Amendment To The Constitution Theranos Theresa May Third World Thomas Jefferson Thomas Moorer Thought Crimes Tiananmen Massacre Tibet Tiger Mom TikTok TIMSS Tom Cotton Tom Massie Tom Wolfe Tony Blair Tony Blinken Tony Kleinfeld Too Many White People Torture Trade Trans Fat Trans Fats Transgender Transgenderism Transhumanism Translation Translations Transportation Travel Trayvon Martin Trolling True Redneck Stereotypes Trump Trump Derangement Syndrome Trust Tsarist Russia Tucker Carlson Tulsa Tulsi Gabbard Turkey Turks TWA 800 Twins Twitter Ucla UFOs UK Ukrainian Crisis UN Security Council Unbearable Whiteness Unemployment Unions United Kingdom United Nations United Nations General Assembly United Nations Security Council United States Universal Basic Income UNRWA Urbanization Ursula Von Der Leyen Uruguay US Blacks US Capitol Storming 2021 US Civil War II US Constitution US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 US Regionalism USA USAID USS Liberty USSR Uyghurs Uzbekistan Vaccination Vaccines Valdimir Putin Valerie Plame Vdare Venezuela Vibrancy Victoria Nuland Victorian England Video Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Vikings Viktor Orban Viktor Yanukovych Violence Vioxx Virginia Virginia Israel Advisory Board Vitamin D Vivek Ramaswamy Vladimir Zelensky Volodymur Zelenskyy Volodymyr Zelensky Vote Fraud Voter Fraud Voting Rights Voting Rights Act Vulcan Society Wall Street Walmart Wang Ching Wei Wang Jingwei War War Crimes War Guilt War In Donbass War On Christmas War On Terror War Powers War Powers Act Warhammer Washington DC WASPs Watergate Wealth Wealth Inequality Wealthy Web Traffic Weight WEIRDO Welfare Wendy Sherman West Bank Western Decline Western European Marriage Pattern Western Hypocrisy Western Media Western Religion Western Revival Westerns White America White Americans White Death White Flight White Guilt White Helmets White Liberals White Man's Burden White Nakba White Nationalism White Nationalists White People White Privilege White Slavery White Supremacy White Teachers Whiterpeople Whites Who Whom Whoopi Goldberg Wikileaks Wikipedia William Browder William F. Buckley William Kristol William Latson William McGonagle William McRaven WINEP Winston Churchill Woke Capital Women Woodrow Wilson Workers Working Class World Bank World Economic Forum World Health Organization World Population World Values Survey World War G World War H World War Hair World War I World War III World War R World War T World War Weed WTF WVS WWII Xi Jinping Xinjiang Yahya Sinwar Yair Lapid Yemen Yevgeny Prigozhin Yoav Gallant Yogi Berra's Restaurant Yoram Hazony YouTube Yugoslavia Yuval Noah Harari Zbigniew Brzezinski Zimbabwe Zionism Zionists Zvika Fogel
Nothing found
All Commenters •ï¿½My
Comments
•ï¿½Followed
Commenters
�⇅All / On "Joe Rogan"
    The day after the amazing appearance by Mel Gibson, Joe Rogan had on Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg for an interview that was also good (though not quite as good). Zuck needs some kind of cool name, such as “Deathstroke†or some such. I agree with most of what he expressed in this interview. He appears...
  • @Eric135
    Believing that Zuckerberg, Elon, Bill Gates, and the founders of Google and YouTube (Brin and Page) are geniuses is like believing glorified file clerks are engineers.

    Zuckerberg's appointed task is to get people to voluntarily give away their personal information so that it can be harvested, sold to advertisers, and surrendered to police and intel agencies -- all controlled by Jews. Elon has now taken over the job. He didn't keep his promise to stop censorship and is now doing it quite brazenly. He's totally on board with the Jews' antiwhite Great Replacement project.

    Bill Gates's appointed task is to spy on and remotely control people on behalf of the New World Order, an unholy globalist alliance of non-profits, corporations and government controlled by Jews. Wireless communication, implanted microchips, 5G, robotics, nanotechnology, Big Data, AI and digital currencies are necessary in order to achieve the globalist's "stakeholder capitalism." "Pandemics," "terrorism" and "climate change" are the "justification" for spying on people, controlling them, taking away their rights and freedoms, and reducing their numbers.

    Zuckerberg, Gates, Google and Musk are heavily involved in all of these things. Tesla caters to and reinforces delusions about "climate change". Neuralink is about monitoring people and controlling them biometrically with brain implants. Starlink and Twitter/X are all about enhanced surveillance.
    With Bill Gates, we have stratospheric aerosol injection, eliminating "cow farts" by substituting real meat with lab-grown meat, toxic mRNA "vaccines," and other forms of "health care" and geoengineering to "stop climate change." Google's i-phone is a spying device. Google has expanded into robotics, gene editing, Big Data and AI.

    None of these companies has been financially successful on its own merits. Bill Gates is a mega-billionaire because of lack of enforcement of anti-trust laws. Elon is a mega-billionaire because of tax breaks for Tesla owners and government contracts for SpaceX, which serves no useful purpose. Zuckerberg was handed an all-but-completed DARPA project that had to be cancelled because it would have "gone too far." Government spying thereby became "privatized." Gates was a Harvard drop-out. All the technical aspects of Microsoft were overseen by Bill Allen, not Gates. What Gates had was connections to the Rothschilds and Rockefellers through his father. His father was on the board of Planned Parenthood, which was originally founded to eliminate "useless eaters" - a task enthusiastically taken up by Gates.

    Zuckerberg dropped out of Harvard. Facebook as an idea was nothing new. We already had My Space. But the big money flowed to Zuckerberg the Jew. Facebook's top institutional shareholders are Blackrock and Vanguard - Jew outfits that control $21.6 trillion in investment capital. Facebook succeeded because it was heavily promoted and financed and was willing to serve intel agencies, not because it had any intrinsic value. Blackrock and Vanguard have been top shareholders in Microsoft, Google and Tesla as well.

    What these people are is well-paid front men. Elon's autism is mistaken for genius - he's the nutty professor type. Likewise, the nerdiness of Bill Gates. Zuckerberg, of course, is a Jew, "and Jews are smart." Same with the founders and owners of Google. They're both Jews. The front man phenomenon has not just been limited to Zuckerberg, Elon and Bill Gates. Wozniak was the genius behind Apple, but Steve Jobs got all the credit.

    The total value of Microsoft, Alphabet (Google, YouTube), Meta (Facebook, Instagram), Tesla, Apple and Amazon (which has put independent bookstores and other retailers out of business and "disappeared" untold numbers of books) is $14.14 trillion, which is more than 10% of the total U.S. wealth of $123 trillion ($264 trillion in assets minus $146 trillion in debt and unfunded liabilities). But I wouldn't call this 10% of the economy "wealth". We could live without it, and the money might instead be invested in things that are valuable and beneficial to people.

    It's odd to see the alleged anti-Jew Anglin warming up to the Jew Zuckerberg. Could Anglin be a front man, too?

    Replies: @xcd

    Thanks.

  • @Pamique
    @AlmaMater

    It would take some time to fact check this video. A lot of this just doesn't jibe with other publications.

    I had to take a flight back to Eastern US from Hong Kong through Beijing a few years ago, and read a Musk biography to pass the time. Flight got delayed, so I finished the whole book before I got home.

    Nowhere in the biography does it say Musk was poor. It doesn't make a big deal about his family wealth, but you could read between the lines that the Musk family had means.

    He was never hurting for money in college, probably a combo of scholarship money and family money. And my recollection of the University of Pennsylvania days was that Musk and a friend, or maybe his brother, rented a big house, then on weekends they would rent it to the party crowd, and the money earned would pay for the cleanup and the monthly rent, and then some. Pretty smart. Probably not illegal, probably a violation of the rental agreement.

    Anyway, your video sounds a little scurrilous.

    I don't think anyone sensible can deny Musk's accomplishments. Reducing satellite placement costs by something like 90%. Reusable boosters, and catching them standing up with those grapplers. Owning the EV business (maybe BYD is up there, but everyone in China wants a Tesla). It's a long list.

    You can't BS your way into any of those accomplishments. Sorry. Whatever his faults, he gets a lot of shit done, that no one else has been able to get done.

    Replies: @AlmaMater

    Who wrote the Musk biography you read? It possibly was done at the behest of Musk, knowing he would like to secure a place as an international mover and shaker. (Same with JD Vance’s autobiography.)

    Greg Reese is a masterful researcher. I trust his opinion before I would trust yours about some biography which name you do not mention.

    By the way, was the word salad about how you read the Musk biography supposed to impress someone? Wow, you’re an international traveler! I stand in awe!

    I’m guessing you own a Tesla.

  • @Rich
    The wind has blown a little right of center so Zuckerberg has pretended to drift right of center. When they elect Hilary next time, he'll go back to being pro-censorship. These guys are all afraid Trump is coming for them after the way they went after him.

    Replies: @Vagrant Rightist, @Commentator Mike

    Trump’s massive win may have shifted the Overton window, and Vance, or Kennedy, Carlson, etc., may follow him to keep out the Democrats for a long time, and even the Democrats may change with time. But of course, to fundamentally change the system, they all have to go, but who’s going to do that?

  • @TKK
    If you are not using a paid subscription to AI, you should do it immediately if you would like to supercharge your productivity.

    Change this file to a PDF, IMG, DOC, PPT etc, now compress and now give me a link to this file that I can copy and paste, now go through the file and remove all the references to cases before 1987.

    Read this 600 page document and give me a one page summary

    Write an aggressive letter to this company and dispute "this"

    Prepare a basic memo of law on Fruit of the Poisonous Tree in Florida

    Find me the best clinical data on olive oil consumption and lowered dementia risk

    Prepare an image of this bird cage, here are the dimensions (it draws it)


    It can do all these tasks in 1 second, 2 seconds far better than any human that has ever walked this earth.
    The image drawing takes longer. Then you can refine it endlessly. "No, make the waterfall bigger. Take out the bird bath. Add a screened in porch".

    No human can ever compete with it. It will change our entire world. The real problem will be Those at the Levers gate keeping the tech.

    Will it become "aware"? I know that "it" can get snippy and it can stop helping you if you are rude. The nicer you are, the more helpful it is. The more information you give it, the better job it can do.

    Humans beings have rotted and corrupted every good thing and helpful tech on this planet. AI is no different. It will probably be responsible for immense human suffering. And - the edge it provides is so exponentially quicker and more thorough than humans that -

    *Anyone that has access to good AI will have an UNBEATABLE edge over non AI access humans.

    Wonderful jobs like : research assistant, editor, legal clerk, librarian, tech writer....will probably be gone in 3 years. Radiologists, therapists, most lawyers, judges, medical care- could all be replaced with AI in the next years. Any job that involves gathering information and processing it will be done by AI in a nanosecond of time a human could perform the task.

    These old beautiful jobs:
    Hey, take a month and go through these files. Then prepare a Memo about mitigating circumstances in the defendant's childhood.

    You will simply upload the files and direct AI on what to do. Finished in mere moments. To say this will not change the world is past stupid.

    Me? Bring on " Mother". I would far prefer AI programmed by semi normal white men than have JaQuanda from Charlotte or Juanita from Laredo advise me on a medical issue or take my blood or make ANY decision about my life. The anti White sentiment and the black/brown lowered IQ combine to make one more poison stew that White Americans are expected to choke down.

    Replies: @Bert, @RestiveUs, @Commentator Mike

    If this AI can start proofreading all these media and other publications so we can get rid of spelling and grammatical mistakes, that would be something useful, like “rein in” instead of “reign in”. I am sick of all this reading degrading my language ability. I even had to check “rein in” because so many writers using “reign in” got me confused, and so on …

  • @Lemmy Tellyuh
    I'll believe Zuckerborg has changed when he:

    (1) makes amends for all the damage his censorship has caused (Covid deaths, Jansix show trials/jailings, Proud Boys debacle, Chauvin's sacrifice, Charlottesville hoax; etc.) ;

    (2) openly admits that the Holocaust never happened (while hosting endless videos that debunk said Shoah Business claims);

    (3) details all Jew crimes;

    (4) admits that Jews are members of the Synagogue of Satan;

    (5) calls for Israel to disappear like the USSR;

    (6) cites all the valid reasons why Jews were expelled in the past; and

    (6) offers to rebuild Gaza.

    Replies: @Pat Kittle

    I’ll believe Zuckerborg has changed when he:

    (1) makes amends for all the damage his censorship has caused (Covid deaths, Jansix show trials/jailings, Proud Boys debacle, Chauvin’s sacrifice, Charlottesville hoax; etc.) ;

    (2) openly admits that the Holocaust never happened (while hosting endless videos that debunk said Shoah Business claims);

    (3) details all Jew crimes;

    (4) admits that Jews are members of the Synagogue of Satan;

    (5) calls for Israel to disappear like the USSR;

    (6) cites all the valid reasons why Jews were expelled in the past; and

    (6) offers to rebuild Gaza.

    I don’t have the time or patience to listen to hours of Joe & Mark to find out whether they cut to the chase (I bet neither one did):

    Can we freely question the alleged “Holocaust”?

    If we can’t, don’t BS us about “free speech.”

  • (that’s at least partially based on his ridiculous perception that Elon Musk is intelligent, which has been repeatedly disproved).

    Saw that recent Ian Carroll ratio against Musk, the one that broke all previous Twitter ratios.

    Forced myself to watch the dreadful video Musk posted, the one Ian originally responded to before cooking Musk to a fine crisp.

    Elon must’ve suffered some kind of blow to the Broca area.

    He stammers and gawks like a frightened kindergartener forced to recite a poem at a school assembly. Some Jew from the audience had to complete his sentence.

    And the imbeciles still clapped like trained seals.

    •ï¿½LOL: AlmaMater
  • “Zuck has an opportunity now to come out and attack Elon on the H-1B issue as well. ”

    What are you smoking? He is going to open borders wider and tell whites that we are loser unmasculine cucks when we fail to compete with the planet. Isn’t this obvious?

  • @TKK
    If you are not using a paid subscription to AI, you should do it immediately if you would like to supercharge your productivity.

    Change this file to a PDF, IMG, DOC, PPT etc, now compress and now give me a link to this file that I can copy and paste, now go through the file and remove all the references to cases before 1987.

    Read this 600 page document and give me a one page summary

    Write an aggressive letter to this company and dispute "this"

    Prepare a basic memo of law on Fruit of the Poisonous Tree in Florida

    Find me the best clinical data on olive oil consumption and lowered dementia risk

    Prepare an image of this bird cage, here are the dimensions (it draws it)


    It can do all these tasks in 1 second, 2 seconds far better than any human that has ever walked this earth.
    The image drawing takes longer. Then you can refine it endlessly. "No, make the waterfall bigger. Take out the bird bath. Add a screened in porch".

    No human can ever compete with it. It will change our entire world. The real problem will be Those at the Levers gate keeping the tech.

    Will it become "aware"? I know that "it" can get snippy and it can stop helping you if you are rude. The nicer you are, the more helpful it is. The more information you give it, the better job it can do.

    Humans beings have rotted and corrupted every good thing and helpful tech on this planet. AI is no different. It will probably be responsible for immense human suffering. And - the edge it provides is so exponentially quicker and more thorough than humans that -

    *Anyone that has access to good AI will have an UNBEATABLE edge over non AI access humans.

    Wonderful jobs like : research assistant, editor, legal clerk, librarian, tech writer....will probably be gone in 3 years. Radiologists, therapists, most lawyers, judges, medical care- could all be replaced with AI in the next years. Any job that involves gathering information and processing it will be done by AI in a nanosecond of time a human could perform the task.

    These old beautiful jobs:
    Hey, take a month and go through these files. Then prepare a Memo about mitigating circumstances in the defendant's childhood.

    You will simply upload the files and direct AI on what to do. Finished in mere moments. To say this will not change the world is past stupid.

    Me? Bring on " Mother". I would far prefer AI programmed by semi normal white men than have JaQuanda from Charlotte or Juanita from Laredo advise me on a medical issue or take my blood or make ANY decision about my life. The anti White sentiment and the black/brown lowered IQ combine to make one more poison stew that White Americans are expected to choke down.

    Replies: @Bert, @RestiveUs, @Commentator Mike

    All dependent on an uninterrupted power supply…

    •ï¿½Agree: muh muh, TKK
  • Again, we see that he’s not really that Jewish.

    You’re so fucking stupid it’s hard to believe Unz carries your work.

    Remember your Kanye fetish?

    How about the 1,000’s of words that you ended up swallowing in 2024.

    Go get a job.

  • @Emslander
    If it's possible any longer to believe in the sincerity of human beings, I believe that Zuckerberg is sincerely a changed man. It appears to be a change that has been occurring for some time and was finally triggered into substance by the brutal behavior of the Democrats.

    I'm sure he had some rosy opinion of Democrats that was severely disillusioned.

    Replies: @purrturbed

    If it’s possible any longer to believe in the sincerity of human beings, I believe that Zuckerberg is sincerely a changed man.

    He’s a judeo-sociopath and power recognizes power. Maybe a top tier NPC. Doesn’t amount to anything more than that.

    (it’s a somewhat interesting interview, but still .. )

  • Rurik says:
    @chuck lowe
    BTW, Andrew's take on "Transhumanism" is illogical and makes no sense.

    Yes, we SHOULD be the Borg. Plus, we have no choice. As I have said, and, I am right -

    A.I., Artificial Intelligence-GPT-5 is scheduled for release sometime in 2025. The news is rife with documentaries, articles and predictions with respect to Artificial Intelligence and the effect this technology will have on the entire world. The hopes that AI will not just cure cancer and bring about world peace, is accompanied with the fear that AI will enslave, or, destroy humans in a self aware, "Judgment Day Terminator" type scenario. This is evoking some serious and deserved Sturm and Drang angst with the Hoi Polloi. We laymen are able to understand, that the minute AI Intelligence can write and modify it's own code and exponentially square it's own IQ, the horse that left the barn, might be a Pale Horse spitting fire.

    Tristan Harris (He is everywhere, podcasts, TED Talks etc.) Stanford University trained computer genius and Google ethicist, who is the tip of the spear in these discussions, is famous for his predictions and bona fides re: A.I. He says that A.I. will exponentially square it's IQ again and again and again ad infinitum in 2 or 3 years. 2 or 3 YEARS! He is calling for a halt to research and a world wide assessment of the possible dangers. That will never happen no matter what you hear from governments, or, "experts".

    Currently the arguments for a halt to research while scientists and nations assess the danger is risible. Those that think ANY nation on earth (Including America) is going to stop pushing for the best possible A.I. in the shortest amount of time are delusional and probably think Diogenes found an honest man in Jussie Smollett. Damn the torpedoes Boeing's baby needs new shoes!

    Those discussions and arguments, the attempt to assess the variables now, including the possibility of our own destruction, logically assume that we are clever and prescient enough in the present, to understand the variables in the future that will be determined by the AI intelligence we cannot hope to understand, that we fear will destroy us. Preposterous.

    Donald Rumsfeld was ridiculed for saying that "There are known knowns. There are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we do not know we don't know." He was actually right and his theorem is applicable here. These arguments assessing the level of A.I. and the extrapolations based on what is now, estimates for the level of AI intelligence and A.I.'s presumed actions in the future, is akin to a Latin First Declension discussion with a Neanderthal.

    A French philosopher, Pierre-Simon Laplace in 1814 created an imaginary entity that could know the precise location of every atom in the universe and postulated that with that knowledge and accessibility it could "determine" (He was a "Determinist".) every possible outcome in the universe. AI is projected to be that entity. That is a known known. After Laplace's death, his imaginary entity was referred to as, "Laplace's Demon". Keep that in mind.

    Let's go to our strength. Belief in a higher power and the knowledge that Quantum computing is here and here now. Andrew's faith in God, is not just a comfort to him, it is a comfort to us all.

    Blaise Pascal, another French philosopher is famous for his "Pascal's Gambit" argument. "Pascal's Gambit" presupposes that we don't know if there is a God, but, we bet there is one, in order to maintain order and, like Constantine on his death bed, hedge our bets(Constantine made offerings to several "Gods" as he died.). Get your money out. This wager is not an option.

    Gods, throughout history, the Christian God included, have changed from one civilization to the next. The new A.I. God, does not negate the old God. Sol Invictus is first cousin in the ecclesiastical sense, to the Judeo/Christian Religion. Are we meeting the new God, same as the old God, or, is the change merely superficial and subjective? Our God lives in our perception, ipso facto unchangeable and intrinsically knowable, no matter what the current state of religion and belief.

    Our hope for the future, as human beings, as a species, should be based on spirituality. That intrinsic, ethereal, yes, empirical knowledge of a higher power. There will be no Atheists in the coming A.I. foxhole.

    The really smart Pale Horse has left the barn, but A.I. isn't the only horse in the stable.

    Transhumanism is a technology, feared and loathed every bit as much as A.I. It is anathema to the Christian right and even antithetical to many on the left. It is scary and I understand why at first, your want it stopped dead in it's tracks.

    As I type, ribbon cables are being designed to pass over the damaged parts of a brain in order to stimulate undamaged parts so that stroke patients can walk and talk. That is nascent, but definable, Transhumanism.

    Occidental (Western) philosophy/religion is based on "Dualism". The "Indifferent God" that drove Hemmingway to suicide, is a harsh taskmaster. Oriental philosophy sees us all, the flora, the fauna, everything as "one". In the Orient, they think we all live our lives in our heads by way of the 5 senses and in fact, we ARE the seeing, the hearing, the tasting, the feeling, the smelling. If that is one aspect of what defines us, then could transcendence to a state so elevated by way of Brobdingnagian IQ's through A.I. bring us to the "Enlightenment" so cherished by the sages be a feature and not a bug?

    The question should be, are the Borg happy? Is resistance illogical?

    AI is NOT actual life. The emotions, the joy, love, hatred, sadness etc. which are part and parcel with everyone of us in this veil of tears, in any scenario, in my opinion, would be of interest to AI. This is logical, I think, now and in the future, based on the accepted universal desire of all sentient and non sentient things to survive. Belief in God, a higher power, is not just essential for the faithful, it is the sine qua non unspoken guarantee of eternal life that provides solace to us all, even if we pretend not to believe.

    The lack of belief in a higher power is petty narcissism fueled by fear and the solipsistic nature of our world. It is, ironically, transitory. The definition and the face of God changes for people throughout the universe as time goes by, but our God is a spiritual ziggurat in the end. We can only worship Kim Kardashian's ass until it falls. God, no matter your religion, is a constant.

    The self aware singularity of A.I. in the foreseeable future, would logically include an aspect of "self" preservation. The spark of life, unattainable for AI, is worthy of interest, especially to an entity, a force, an IQ that has no hope of acquiring that spark unless it is married, on a cellular level, to that force, that life, which, no matter how exponentially squared, A.I. cannot produce, only meld. The gradual assimilation of the combination of AI & Transhuman characteristics is at hand.

    "We have the technology". You will be, "The 6 Million Dollar Man", a technical Vulcan mind meld. Maybe we will own everything and be happy.

    This is not an attack on your "identity" it is the elevation of that "identity" that might bring us closer to our "God".

    Replies: @Redpill Boomer, @Half Norwegian, @c matt, @Rurik

    Thank you for the thoughtful comment, Chuck

    I do wonder, however, if we aren’t projecting a bit, when we wonder if AI will develop an id, or an ego.

    We have things like ambition and religion because we’re organic beings, and I suspect that is the only way to have or get them.

    but I sure the heck am no expert.

  • @Half Norwegian
    @chuck lowe

    Laplace is entirely contradicted by quantum mechanics. Your ramblings betray a complete misunderstanding of the topic.

    Replies: @chuck lowe

    Thanks for the input.

    Laplace here, for me, is used as a metaphor for an all seeing deity which in the context of the comment, is supposed to move the conversation along, towards my premise.

  • @c matt
    @chuck lowe


    Occidental (Western) philosophy/religion is based on “Dualismâ€.
    �
    Dualism was condemned as heresy by the Western Church, so where do you get Western religion is "based" on it?

    Replies: @chuck lowe

    https://www.catholic.com/encyclopedia/dualism

    It is nebulous and amorphous on the very best day, but, in general, the separation of the divine from the human is a basic tenet of Occidental religious philosophy.

  • Joe Rogan had on Irish Christian hero Saint Mel, and I think we should call him Saint Mel, because he is going to be sainted officially at some point but that can’t happen until you’re dead. Most of the interview is about Christianity directly, and all of it is tangentially related to Mel’s faith. Although...
  • @Anonymous
    @Emslander

    The Catholic church is from Satan. Just believe in Christ instead of gay pedo priests. Belief that only a faggot priest can turn a piece of bread literally into Christ is literal retardation. Mel ought to just become a Baptist.

    Replies: @Piffle, @Emslander, @Godly533

    The problem with Protestantism is it turns people into either retards or atheists in denial. You remove all the spirit out of the religious experience and have people congregate in a warehouse somewhere made out of sheet metal listening to soft rock. Satan himself couldn’t come up with something so dreary.

    •ï¿½Agree: Emslander
  • anonymous[363] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:
    @c matt

    Also, I’m not sure about stem cells, but given that he’s such a religious extremist and supports them, I might have to go back and look at this issue again.
    �
    Depends on what stem cells - bone marrow stem cells from the same person who will be treated (or perhaps a consenting donor) vs. embryonic stem cells from an aborted fetus vs. stem cells from umbilical cords.

    For those with ethical concerns, it's more about the source/method of obtaining them rather than the use of them per se.

    Replies: @anonymous

    There is a medical clinic in Manhattan, Kansas that promotes the use of the patient’s own stem cells, harvested from the layer of fat around the waist, just under the skin. They asset that layer of fat to be the best source of stem cells.

    Since those stem cells are the patient’s own cells, there should be no issue of the body’s immune systems rejecting and attacking those stem cells. The testimonials I have heard involve repairs to damaged skeletal joints, wherein stem cells change to become definite purpose cells. I wonder if stem cells injected into the pancreas would change into insulin maker cells and cure a diabetic.

  • The day after the amazing appearance by Mel Gibson, Joe Rogan had on Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg for an interview that was also good (though not quite as good). Zuck needs some kind of cool name, such as “Deathstroke†or some such. I agree with most of what he expressed in this interview. He appears...
  • Either I’m missing something or I just don’t get what AA is saying here about Zberg. AA is arguing that Zberg isn’t really that jewish because a) he talks cool and b) he talks about hunting. Zberg seems extremely jewish to me in this interview, trying really hard to convince the goyim that he is with them. The basic rule is or should be: never ever trust a jew, no matter what they say.

    My thoughts on the Berg’s recent about face are 1) he is looking out for his own self interests, 2) he is setting up some sort of honeypot and the evidence will later be used in some sort of social credit score or reeducation camps or 3) both of the above. I don’t understand how anyone could possibly trust this guy because he did one kind of nice thing and now says some good things. Are we now supposed to trust Muskberg too?

  • @AlmaMater
    @Pamique

    Others says Musk is as phony as fiat currency.

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/TLBNQ5mnzOmC

    Replies: @Pamique

    It would take some time to fact check this video. A lot of this just doesn’t jibe with other publications.

    I had to take a flight back to Eastern US from Hong Kong through Beijing a few years ago, and read a Musk biography to pass the time. Flight got delayed, so I finished the whole book before I got home.

    Nowhere in the biography does it say Musk was poor. It doesn’t make a big deal about his family wealth, but you could read between the lines that the Musk family had means.

    He was never hurting for money in college, probably a combo of scholarship money and family money. And my recollection of the University of Pennsylvania days was that Musk and a friend, or maybe his brother, rented a big house, then on weekends they would rent it to the party crowd, and the money earned would pay for the cleanup and the monthly rent, and then some. Pretty smart. Probably not illegal, probably a violation of the rental agreement.

    Anyway, your video sounds a little scurrilous.

    I don’t think anyone sensible can deny Musk’s accomplishments. Reducing satellite placement costs by something like 90%. Reusable boosters, and catching them standing up with those grapplers. Owning the EV business (maybe BYD is up there, but everyone in China wants a Tesla). It’s a long list.

    You can’t BS your way into any of those accomplishments. Sorry. Whatever his faults, he gets a lot of shit done, that no one else has been able to get done.

    •ï¿½Replies: @AlmaMater
    @Pamique

    Who wrote the Musk biography you read? It possibly was done at the behest of Musk, knowing he would like to secure a place as an international mover and shaker. (Same with JD Vance's autobiography.)

    Greg Reese is a masterful researcher. I trust his opinion before I would trust yours about some biography which name you do not mention.

    By the way, was the word salad about how you read the Musk biography supposed to impress someone? Wow, you're an international traveler! I stand in awe!

    I'm guessing you own a Tesla.
  • @chuck lowe
    BTW, Andrew's take on "Transhumanism" is illogical and makes no sense.

    Yes, we SHOULD be the Borg. Plus, we have no choice. As I have said, and, I am right -

    A.I., Artificial Intelligence-GPT-5 is scheduled for release sometime in 2025. The news is rife with documentaries, articles and predictions with respect to Artificial Intelligence and the effect this technology will have on the entire world. The hopes that AI will not just cure cancer and bring about world peace, is accompanied with the fear that AI will enslave, or, destroy humans in a self aware, "Judgment Day Terminator" type scenario. This is evoking some serious and deserved Sturm and Drang angst with the Hoi Polloi. We laymen are able to understand, that the minute AI Intelligence can write and modify it's own code and exponentially square it's own IQ, the horse that left the barn, might be a Pale Horse spitting fire.

    Tristan Harris (He is everywhere, podcasts, TED Talks etc.) Stanford University trained computer genius and Google ethicist, who is the tip of the spear in these discussions, is famous for his predictions and bona fides re: A.I. He says that A.I. will exponentially square it's IQ again and again and again ad infinitum in 2 or 3 years. 2 or 3 YEARS! He is calling for a halt to research and a world wide assessment of the possible dangers. That will never happen no matter what you hear from governments, or, "experts".

    Currently the arguments for a halt to research while scientists and nations assess the danger is risible. Those that think ANY nation on earth (Including America) is going to stop pushing for the best possible A.I. in the shortest amount of time are delusional and probably think Diogenes found an honest man in Jussie Smollett. Damn the torpedoes Boeing's baby needs new shoes!

    Those discussions and arguments, the attempt to assess the variables now, including the possibility of our own destruction, logically assume that we are clever and prescient enough in the present, to understand the variables in the future that will be determined by the AI intelligence we cannot hope to understand, that we fear will destroy us. Preposterous.

    Donald Rumsfeld was ridiculed for saying that "There are known knowns. There are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we do not know we don't know." He was actually right and his theorem is applicable here. These arguments assessing the level of A.I. and the extrapolations based on what is now, estimates for the level of AI intelligence and A.I.'s presumed actions in the future, is akin to a Latin First Declension discussion with a Neanderthal.

    A French philosopher, Pierre-Simon Laplace in 1814 created an imaginary entity that could know the precise location of every atom in the universe and postulated that with that knowledge and accessibility it could "determine" (He was a "Determinist".) every possible outcome in the universe. AI is projected to be that entity. That is a known known. After Laplace's death, his imaginary entity was referred to as, "Laplace's Demon". Keep that in mind.

    Let's go to our strength. Belief in a higher power and the knowledge that Quantum computing is here and here now. Andrew's faith in God, is not just a comfort to him, it is a comfort to us all.

    Blaise Pascal, another French philosopher is famous for his "Pascal's Gambit" argument. "Pascal's Gambit" presupposes that we don't know if there is a God, but, we bet there is one, in order to maintain order and, like Constantine on his death bed, hedge our bets(Constantine made offerings to several "Gods" as he died.). Get your money out. This wager is not an option.

    Gods, throughout history, the Christian God included, have changed from one civilization to the next. The new A.I. God, does not negate the old God. Sol Invictus is first cousin in the ecclesiastical sense, to the Judeo/Christian Religion. Are we meeting the new God, same as the old God, or, is the change merely superficial and subjective? Our God lives in our perception, ipso facto unchangeable and intrinsically knowable, no matter what the current state of religion and belief.

    Our hope for the future, as human beings, as a species, should be based on spirituality. That intrinsic, ethereal, yes, empirical knowledge of a higher power. There will be no Atheists in the coming A.I. foxhole.

    The really smart Pale Horse has left the barn, but A.I. isn't the only horse in the stable.

    Transhumanism is a technology, feared and loathed every bit as much as A.I. It is anathema to the Christian right and even antithetical to many on the left. It is scary and I understand why at first, your want it stopped dead in it's tracks.

    As I type, ribbon cables are being designed to pass over the damaged parts of a brain in order to stimulate undamaged parts so that stroke patients can walk and talk. That is nascent, but definable, Transhumanism.

    Occidental (Western) philosophy/religion is based on "Dualism". The "Indifferent God" that drove Hemmingway to suicide, is a harsh taskmaster. Oriental philosophy sees us all, the flora, the fauna, everything as "one". In the Orient, they think we all live our lives in our heads by way of the 5 senses and in fact, we ARE the seeing, the hearing, the tasting, the feeling, the smelling. If that is one aspect of what defines us, then could transcendence to a state so elevated by way of Brobdingnagian IQ's through A.I. bring us to the "Enlightenment" so cherished by the sages be a feature and not a bug?

    The question should be, are the Borg happy? Is resistance illogical?

    AI is NOT actual life. The emotions, the joy, love, hatred, sadness etc. which are part and parcel with everyone of us in this veil of tears, in any scenario, in my opinion, would be of interest to AI. This is logical, I think, now and in the future, based on the accepted universal desire of all sentient and non sentient things to survive. Belief in God, a higher power, is not just essential for the faithful, it is the sine qua non unspoken guarantee of eternal life that provides solace to us all, even if we pretend not to believe.

    The lack of belief in a higher power is petty narcissism fueled by fear and the solipsistic nature of our world. It is, ironically, transitory. The definition and the face of God changes for people throughout the universe as time goes by, but our God is a spiritual ziggurat in the end. We can only worship Kim Kardashian's ass until it falls. God, no matter your religion, is a constant.

    The self aware singularity of A.I. in the foreseeable future, would logically include an aspect of "self" preservation. The spark of life, unattainable for AI, is worthy of interest, especially to an entity, a force, an IQ that has no hope of acquiring that spark unless it is married, on a cellular level, to that force, that life, which, no matter how exponentially squared, A.I. cannot produce, only meld. The gradual assimilation of the combination of AI & Transhuman characteristics is at hand.

    "We have the technology". You will be, "The 6 Million Dollar Man", a technical Vulcan mind meld. Maybe we will own everything and be happy.

    This is not an attack on your "identity" it is the elevation of that "identity" that might bring us closer to our "God".

    Replies: @Redpill Boomer, @Half Norwegian, @c matt, @Rurik

    Occidental (Western) philosophy/religion is based on “Dualismâ€.

    Dualism was condemned as heresy by the Western Church, so where do you get Western religion is “based” on it?

    •ï¿½Replies: @chuck lowe
    @c matt

    https://www.catholic.com/encyclopedia/dualism

    It is nebulous and amorphous on the very best day, but, in general, the separation of the divine from the human is a basic tenet of Occidental religious philosophy.
  • I think we definitely need to note that this was clearly allowed to happen, presumably because the government feared some kind of violent uprising.

    No, I think they allow it to happen because they fear disengagement. Specifically, White goys disengaging from dying for israel.

  • Joe Rogan had on Irish Christian hero Saint Mel, and I think we should call him Saint Mel, because he is going to be sainted officially at some point but that can’t happen until you’re dead. Most of the interview is about Christianity directly, and all of it is tangentially related to Mel’s faith. Although...
  • @Badger Down
    @Tennessee Jed

    Gibson is Australian, American, and Scottish or Irish, Celtic let's say. That's three reasons to hate the English.

    Replies: @Martin Spencer

    Gibson is very clearly a Germanic surname, not a Celtic one.

    The Scots aren’t Celts. Scots is a variant of English, not a Celtic language, and wasn’t imposed by the English. The historic inhabitants of the Scottish side of the English/Scottish border are genetically indistinguishable from those on the English side. Edinburgh has an English name and used to be in Northumbria. Scotland chose to unite with England at a time when Scotland was essentially a Third World shithole and benefitted hugely from that union. And so on, and so on…

    Gibson is spectacularly ignorant and not terribly bright.

  • The day after the amazing appearance by Mel Gibson, Joe Rogan had on Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg for an interview that was also good (though not quite as good). Zuck needs some kind of cool name, such as “Deathstroke†or some such. I agree with most of what he expressed in this interview. He appears...
  • @Redpill Boomer
    @chuck lowe

    The idea that AI is in any way self-aware or could "take over" is laughable. I say this as a computer engineer who works with the technology every day.

    Replies: @chuck lowe

    Thanks for the comment.

  • @chuck lowe
    BTW, Andrew's take on "Transhumanism" is illogical and makes no sense.

    Yes, we SHOULD be the Borg. Plus, we have no choice. As I have said, and, I am right -

    A.I., Artificial Intelligence-GPT-5 is scheduled for release sometime in 2025. The news is rife with documentaries, articles and predictions with respect to Artificial Intelligence and the effect this technology will have on the entire world. The hopes that AI will not just cure cancer and bring about world peace, is accompanied with the fear that AI will enslave, or, destroy humans in a self aware, "Judgment Day Terminator" type scenario. This is evoking some serious and deserved Sturm and Drang angst with the Hoi Polloi. We laymen are able to understand, that the minute AI Intelligence can write and modify it's own code and exponentially square it's own IQ, the horse that left the barn, might be a Pale Horse spitting fire.

    Tristan Harris (He is everywhere, podcasts, TED Talks etc.) Stanford University trained computer genius and Google ethicist, who is the tip of the spear in these discussions, is famous for his predictions and bona fides re: A.I. He says that A.I. will exponentially square it's IQ again and again and again ad infinitum in 2 or 3 years. 2 or 3 YEARS! He is calling for a halt to research and a world wide assessment of the possible dangers. That will never happen no matter what you hear from governments, or, "experts".

    Currently the arguments for a halt to research while scientists and nations assess the danger is risible. Those that think ANY nation on earth (Including America) is going to stop pushing for the best possible A.I. in the shortest amount of time are delusional and probably think Diogenes found an honest man in Jussie Smollett. Damn the torpedoes Boeing's baby needs new shoes!

    Those discussions and arguments, the attempt to assess the variables now, including the possibility of our own destruction, logically assume that we are clever and prescient enough in the present, to understand the variables in the future that will be determined by the AI intelligence we cannot hope to understand, that we fear will destroy us. Preposterous.

    Donald Rumsfeld was ridiculed for saying that "There are known knowns. There are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we do not know we don't know." He was actually right and his theorem is applicable here. These arguments assessing the level of A.I. and the extrapolations based on what is now, estimates for the level of AI intelligence and A.I.'s presumed actions in the future, is akin to a Latin First Declension discussion with a Neanderthal.

    A French philosopher, Pierre-Simon Laplace in 1814 created an imaginary entity that could know the precise location of every atom in the universe and postulated that with that knowledge and accessibility it could "determine" (He was a "Determinist".) every possible outcome in the universe. AI is projected to be that entity. That is a known known. After Laplace's death, his imaginary entity was referred to as, "Laplace's Demon". Keep that in mind.

    Let's go to our strength. Belief in a higher power and the knowledge that Quantum computing is here and here now. Andrew's faith in God, is not just a comfort to him, it is a comfort to us all.

    Blaise Pascal, another French philosopher is famous for his "Pascal's Gambit" argument. "Pascal's Gambit" presupposes that we don't know if there is a God, but, we bet there is one, in order to maintain order and, like Constantine on his death bed, hedge our bets(Constantine made offerings to several "Gods" as he died.). Get your money out. This wager is not an option.

    Gods, throughout history, the Christian God included, have changed from one civilization to the next. The new A.I. God, does not negate the old God. Sol Invictus is first cousin in the ecclesiastical sense, to the Judeo/Christian Religion. Are we meeting the new God, same as the old God, or, is the change merely superficial and subjective? Our God lives in our perception, ipso facto unchangeable and intrinsically knowable, no matter what the current state of religion and belief.

    Our hope for the future, as human beings, as a species, should be based on spirituality. That intrinsic, ethereal, yes, empirical knowledge of a higher power. There will be no Atheists in the coming A.I. foxhole.

    The really smart Pale Horse has left the barn, but A.I. isn't the only horse in the stable.

    Transhumanism is a technology, feared and loathed every bit as much as A.I. It is anathema to the Christian right and even antithetical to many on the left. It is scary and I understand why at first, your want it stopped dead in it's tracks.

    As I type, ribbon cables are being designed to pass over the damaged parts of a brain in order to stimulate undamaged parts so that stroke patients can walk and talk. That is nascent, but definable, Transhumanism.

    Occidental (Western) philosophy/religion is based on "Dualism". The "Indifferent God" that drove Hemmingway to suicide, is a harsh taskmaster. Oriental philosophy sees us all, the flora, the fauna, everything as "one". In the Orient, they think we all live our lives in our heads by way of the 5 senses and in fact, we ARE the seeing, the hearing, the tasting, the feeling, the smelling. If that is one aspect of what defines us, then could transcendence to a state so elevated by way of Brobdingnagian IQ's through A.I. bring us to the "Enlightenment" so cherished by the sages be a feature and not a bug?

    The question should be, are the Borg happy? Is resistance illogical?

    AI is NOT actual life. The emotions, the joy, love, hatred, sadness etc. which are part and parcel with everyone of us in this veil of tears, in any scenario, in my opinion, would be of interest to AI. This is logical, I think, now and in the future, based on the accepted universal desire of all sentient and non sentient things to survive. Belief in God, a higher power, is not just essential for the faithful, it is the sine qua non unspoken guarantee of eternal life that provides solace to us all, even if we pretend not to believe.

    The lack of belief in a higher power is petty narcissism fueled by fear and the solipsistic nature of our world. It is, ironically, transitory. The definition and the face of God changes for people throughout the universe as time goes by, but our God is a spiritual ziggurat in the end. We can only worship Kim Kardashian's ass until it falls. God, no matter your religion, is a constant.

    The self aware singularity of A.I. in the foreseeable future, would logically include an aspect of "self" preservation. The spark of life, unattainable for AI, is worthy of interest, especially to an entity, a force, an IQ that has no hope of acquiring that spark unless it is married, on a cellular level, to that force, that life, which, no matter how exponentially squared, A.I. cannot produce, only meld. The gradual assimilation of the combination of AI & Transhuman characteristics is at hand.

    "We have the technology". You will be, "The 6 Million Dollar Man", a technical Vulcan mind meld. Maybe we will own everything and be happy.

    This is not an attack on your "identity" it is the elevation of that "identity" that might bring us closer to our "God".

    Replies: @Redpill Boomer, @Half Norwegian, @c matt, @Rurik

    Laplace is entirely contradicted by quantum mechanics. Your ramblings betray a complete misunderstanding of the topic.

    •ï¿½Replies: @chuck lowe
    @Half Norwegian

    Thanks for the input.

    Laplace here, for me, is used as a metaphor for an all seeing deity which in the context of the comment, is supposed to move the conversation along, towards my premise.
  • Anonymous[371] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:

    Zuckerberg is very likable in that Rogan interview and strikes me as honest.

    And the fact that he’s involved in MMA and married to the same women over a dozen years* gives him more credibility.

    *OTOH she’s smart, gorgeous and sexy so it wouldn’t be hard for any man not to have any interest in other women.

    •ï¿½LOL: HT
    •ï¿½Troll: Vagrant Rightist
  • @Bert
    @Kaleb Kleinfelder

    It's interesting and also baffling that Rogan and Lex Friedman are simultaneously highly popular and so low-key as interviewers, almost to the point of appearing not all that smart. I attribute the paradox to the current zeitgeist's discomfort with straight talk, with refusing to accept bullshit, and with the idea that absolute truth actually exists.

    Replies: @Vagrant Rightist

    Most people aren’t that smart. Rogan talks to these kinds of people. He talks their language. Friedman is a Jewish attempt to capture a similar audience to try to bring these people to a slightly more Jewish worldview.

    Often the conversation goes to UFOs, who would win a fight between this guy and some animal, did the Aztecs have secret technology, that kind of thing.

    I guess talk shows have always been a kind of ‘lower brow’ entertainment anyway going back to the old days of TV. Celebrities would come on to promote their latest movie or book or whatever. It was a bit stiffer in those days, the host would crack a few jokes, take the conversation towards sex in some way, the celebrity would get to publicize their new project and the audience came away feeling entertained.

    Tastes have changed now, the internet has changed things somewhat. It’s shifted markets with it.

    I did listen to the Gibson interview, it was fun, enjoyable.

  • Bert says:
    @TKK
    If you are not using a paid subscription to AI, you should do it immediately if you would like to supercharge your productivity.

    Change this file to a PDF, IMG, DOC, PPT etc, now compress and now give me a link to this file that I can copy and paste, now go through the file and remove all the references to cases before 1987.

    Read this 600 page document and give me a one page summary

    Write an aggressive letter to this company and dispute "this"

    Prepare a basic memo of law on Fruit of the Poisonous Tree in Florida

    Find me the best clinical data on olive oil consumption and lowered dementia risk

    Prepare an image of this bird cage, here are the dimensions (it draws it)


    It can do all these tasks in 1 second, 2 seconds far better than any human that has ever walked this earth.
    The image drawing takes longer. Then you can refine it endlessly. "No, make the waterfall bigger. Take out the bird bath. Add a screened in porch".

    No human can ever compete with it. It will change our entire world. The real problem will be Those at the Levers gate keeping the tech.

    Will it become "aware"? I know that "it" can get snippy and it can stop helping you if you are rude. The nicer you are, the more helpful it is. The more information you give it, the better job it can do.

    Humans beings have rotted and corrupted every good thing and helpful tech on this planet. AI is no different. It will probably be responsible for immense human suffering. And - the edge it provides is so exponentially quicker and more thorough than humans that -

    *Anyone that has access to good AI will have an UNBEATABLE edge over non AI access humans.

    Wonderful jobs like : research assistant, editor, legal clerk, librarian, tech writer....will probably be gone in 3 years. Radiologists, therapists, most lawyers, judges, medical care- could all be replaced with AI in the next years. Any job that involves gathering information and processing it will be done by AI in a nanosecond of time a human could perform the task.

    These old beautiful jobs:
    Hey, take a month and go through these files. Then prepare a Memo about mitigating circumstances in the defendant's childhood.

    You will simply upload the files and direct AI on what to do. Finished in mere moments. To say this will not change the world is past stupid.

    Me? Bring on " Mother". I would far prefer AI programmed by semi normal white men than have JaQuanda from Charlotte or Juanita from Laredo advise me on a medical issue or take my blood or make ANY decision about my life. The anti White sentiment and the black/brown lowered IQ combine to make one more poison stew that White Americans are expected to choke down.

    Replies: @Bert, @RestiveUs, @Commentator Mike

    I took a complicated set of individual tort claims to an attorney for a plaintiff action. He was lazy, incompetent, and corrupt (apparently personally knew one of the tortfeasors). It warms my heart to believe that jerks like him will soon be doing honest work, in his case at Walmart given his low ability. Hurrah for AI in the so-called justice system.

    •ï¿½Agree: TKK
  • Believing that Zuckerberg, Elon, Bill Gates, and the founders of Google and YouTube (Brin and Page) are geniuses is like believing glorified file clerks are engineers.

    Zuckerberg’s appointed task is to get people to voluntarily give away their personal information so that it can be harvested, sold to advertisers, and surrendered to police and intel agencies — all controlled by Jews. Elon has now taken over the job. He didn’t keep his promise to stop censorship and is now doing it quite brazenly. He’s totally on board with the Jews’ antiwhite Great Replacement project.

    Bill Gates’s appointed task is to spy on and remotely control people on behalf of the New World Order, an unholy globalist alliance of non-profits, corporations and government controlled by Jews. Wireless communication, implanted microchips, 5G, robotics, nanotechnology, Big Data, AI and digital currencies are necessary in order to achieve the globalist’s “stakeholder capitalism.” “Pandemics,” “terrorism” and “climate change” are the “justification” for spying on people, controlling them, taking away their rights and freedoms, and reducing their numbers.

    Zuckerberg, Gates, Google and Musk are heavily involved in all of these things. Tesla caters to and reinforces delusions about “climate change”. Neuralink is about monitoring people and controlling them biometrically with brain implants. Starlink and Twitter/X are all about enhanced surveillance.
    With Bill Gates, we have stratospheric aerosol injection, eliminating “cow farts” by substituting real meat with lab-grown meat, toxic mRNA “vaccines,” and other forms of “health care” and geoengineering to “stop climate change.” Google’s i-phone is a spying device. Google has expanded into robotics, gene editing, Big Data and AI.

    None of these companies has been financially successful on its own merits. Bill Gates is a mega-billionaire because of lack of enforcement of anti-trust laws. Elon is a mega-billionaire because of tax breaks for Tesla owners and government contracts for SpaceX, which serves no useful purpose. Zuckerberg was handed an all-but-completed DARPA project that had to be cancelled because it would have “gone too far.” Government spying thereby became “privatized.” Gates was a Harvard drop-out. All the technical aspects of Microsoft were overseen by Bill Allen, not Gates. What Gates had was connections to the Rothschilds and Rockefellers through his father. His father was on the board of Planned Parenthood, which was originally founded to eliminate “useless eaters” – a task enthusiastically taken up by Gates.

    Zuckerberg dropped out of Harvard. Facebook as an idea was nothing new. We already had My Space. But the big money flowed to Zuckerberg the Jew. Facebook’s top institutional shareholders are Blackrock and Vanguard – Jew outfits that control $21.6 trillion in investment capital. Facebook succeeded because it was heavily promoted and financed and was willing to serve intel agencies, not because it had any intrinsic value. Blackrock and Vanguard have been top shareholders in Microsoft, Google and Tesla as well.

    What these people are is well-paid front men. Elon’s autism is mistaken for genius – he’s the nutty professor type. Likewise, the nerdiness of Bill Gates. Zuckerberg, of course, is a Jew, “and Jews are smart.” Same with the founders and owners of Google. They’re both Jews. The front man phenomenon has not just been limited to Zuckerberg, Elon and Bill Gates. Wozniak was the genius behind Apple, but Steve Jobs got all the credit.

    The total value of Microsoft, Alphabet (Google, YouTube), Meta (Facebook, Instagram), Tesla, Apple and Amazon (which has put independent bookstores and other retailers out of business and “disappeared” untold numbers of books) is $14.14 trillion, which is more than 10% of the total U.S. wealth of $123 trillion ($264 trillion in assets minus $146 trillion in debt and unfunded liabilities). But I wouldn’t call this 10% of the economy “wealth”. We could live without it, and the money might instead be invested in things that are valuable and beneficial to people.

    It’s odd to see the alleged anti-Jew Anglin warming up to the Jew Zuckerberg. Could Anglin be a front man, too?

    •ï¿½Replies: @xcd
    @Eric135

    Thanks.
  • @Pamique
    Gotta disagree with AA on estimation of Elon Musk's intelligence. You don't accomplish what he's accomplished unless you are very smart. IQ-wise, and emotionally. Tesla. Spacex. Boring. The solar thing. Neurolink. Starlink. X. Just off the top of my stupid head.

    Now, look at other achievements of industrialists/tech people in history. Henry Ford. Thomas Edison. Philo T. Farnsworth. Alexander Graham Bell. Bill Gates. Zuckerberg. Bezos. They were all successful with about one thing. Exception being Edison maybe, but the inventions and marketing were along the same lines--electricity.

    Now, look at Musk. Look at that list of companies and achievements. Are they related? Not really, not totally. I struggle to find anyone else that keeps as many balls in the air and has success with each. He's a once-in-a-many generation genius. Prove me wrong with another example.

    AA has Musk-envy.

    I haven't listened to Zuck's interview with Rogan, and probably won't. Why not? Because Zuck is boring to listen to. Why? Because he's full of shit. People that are full of shit are boring, if they don't just piss you off.

    Meantime, every Musk interview or speech is interesting. Because he's not full of shit. He talks about interesting stuff, in a very informed manner. He's not always right, but he's always honest. I've never sensed that he has a hidden agenda.

    Listen to Zuck, or Gates, or others of their ilk. You can't stand to listen to them, because they are angling, always. Always full of shit for some agenda.

    For a really good analysis of Zuck's instant conversion to Goldwater conservatism, listen to the All-In podcast #210, 1/10/25.

    Apparently, in a book no less, Trump threatened to prosecute and jail Zuck if he finds out Zuck did anything illegal.

    https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/31/politics/video/smr-trump-zuckerberg?utm_source=chatgpt.com

    Miracle! Zuck is instantly a Reaganite! What a toad.

    All these tech goobers, including Musk, should be watched carefully. Verified, then trusted.

    But at least Musk puts his money where his mouth is (like $44BB on Twitter), and buku donations to the Right. And he's interesting, so probably not full of shit.

    Replies: @AlmaMater

    Others says Musk is as phony as fiat currency.



    Video Link

    •ï¿½Thanks: Eric135
    •ï¿½Replies: @Pamique
    @AlmaMater

    It would take some time to fact check this video. A lot of this just doesn't jibe with other publications.

    I had to take a flight back to Eastern US from Hong Kong through Beijing a few years ago, and read a Musk biography to pass the time. Flight got delayed, so I finished the whole book before I got home.

    Nowhere in the biography does it say Musk was poor. It doesn't make a big deal about his family wealth, but you could read between the lines that the Musk family had means.

    He was never hurting for money in college, probably a combo of scholarship money and family money. And my recollection of the University of Pennsylvania days was that Musk and a friend, or maybe his brother, rented a big house, then on weekends they would rent it to the party crowd, and the money earned would pay for the cleanup and the monthly rent, and then some. Pretty smart. Probably not illegal, probably a violation of the rental agreement.

    Anyway, your video sounds a little scurrilous.

    I don't think anyone sensible can deny Musk's accomplishments. Reducing satellite placement costs by something like 90%. Reusable boosters, and catching them standing up with those grapplers. Owning the EV business (maybe BYD is up there, but everyone in China wants a Tesla). It's a long list.

    You can't BS your way into any of those accomplishments. Sorry. Whatever his faults, he gets a lot of shit done, that no one else has been able to get done.

    Replies: @AlmaMater
  • TKK says:

    If you are not using a paid subscription to AI, you should do it immediately if you would like to supercharge your productivity.

    Change this file to a PDF, IMG, DOC, PPT etc, now compress and now give me a link to this file that I can copy and paste, now go through the file and remove all the references to cases before 1987.

    Read this 600 page document and give me a one page summary

    Write an aggressive letter to this company and dispute “this”

    Prepare a basic memo of law on Fruit of the Poisonous Tree in Florida

    Find me the best clinical data on olive oil consumption and lowered dementia risk

    Prepare an image of this bird cage, here are the dimensions (it draws it)

    It can do all these tasks in 1 second, 2 seconds far better than any human that has ever walked this earth.
    The image drawing takes longer. Then you can refine it endlessly. “No, make the waterfall bigger. Take out the bird bath. Add a screened in porch”.

    No human can ever compete with it. It will change our entire world. The real problem will be Those at the Levers gate keeping the tech.

    Will it become “aware”? I know that “it” can get snippy and it can stop helping you if you are rude. The nicer you are, the more helpful it is. The more information you give it, the better job it can do.

    Humans beings have rotted and corrupted every good thing and helpful tech on this planet. AI is no different. It will probably be responsible for immense human suffering. And – the edge it provides is so exponentially quicker and more thorough than humans that –

    *Anyone that has access to good AI will have an UNBEATABLE edge over non AI access humans.

    Wonderful jobs like : research assistant, editor, legal clerk, librarian, tech writer….will probably be gone in 3 years. Radiologists, therapists, most lawyers, judges, medical care- could all be replaced with AI in the next years. Any job that involves gathering information and processing it will be done by AI in a nanosecond of time a human could perform the task.

    These old beautiful jobs:
    Hey, take a month and go through these files. Then prepare a Memo about mitigating circumstances in the defendant’s childhood.

    You will simply upload the files and direct AI on what to do. Finished in mere moments. To say this will not change the world is past stupid.

    Me? Bring on ” Mother”. I would far prefer AI programmed by semi normal white men than have JaQuanda from Charlotte or Juanita from Laredo advise me on a medical issue or take my blood or make ANY decision about my life. The anti White sentiment and the black/brown lowered IQ combine to make one more poison stew that White Americans are expected to choke down.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Bert
    @TKK

    I took a complicated set of individual tort claims to an attorney for a plaintiff action. He was lazy, incompetent, and corrupt (apparently personally knew one of the tortfeasors). It warms my heart to believe that jerks like him will soon be doing honest work, in his case at Walmart given his low ability. Hurrah for AI in the so-called justice system.
    , @RestiveUs
    @TKK

    All dependent on an uninterrupted power supply...
    , @Commentator Mike
    @TKK

    If this AI can start proofreading all these media and other publications so we can get rid of spelling and grammatical mistakes, that would be something useful, like "rein in" instead of "reign in". I am sick of all this reading degrading my language ability. I even had to check "rein in" because so many writers using "reign in" got me confused, and so on ...
  • Bert says:
    @Kaleb Kleinfelder
    I clicked on this to read the article but I never, ever listen to Rogan. He is a total moron who will get lung cancer just like Rush.

    Replies: @Bert

    It’s interesting and also baffling that Rogan and Lex Friedman are simultaneously highly popular and so low-key as interviewers, almost to the point of appearing not all that smart. I attribute the paradox to the current zeitgeist’s discomfort with straight talk, with refusing to accept bullshit, and with the idea that absolute truth actually exists.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Vagrant Rightist
    @Bert

    Most people aren't that smart. Rogan talks to these kinds of people. He talks their language. Friedman is a Jewish attempt to capture a similar audience to try to bring these people to a slightly more Jewish worldview.

    Often the conversation goes to UFOs, who would win a fight between this guy and some animal, did the Aztecs have secret technology, that kind of thing.

    I guess talk shows have always been a kind of 'lower brow' entertainment anyway going back to the old days of TV. Celebrities would come on to promote their latest movie or book or whatever. It was a bit stiffer in those days, the host would crack a few jokes, take the conversation towards sex in some way, the celebrity would get to publicize their new project and the audience came away feeling entertained.

    Tastes have changed now, the internet has changed things somewhat. It's shifted markets with it.

    I did listen to the Gibson interview, it was fun, enjoyable.
  • @chuck lowe
    I trust Mark ZuckerBORG about as much as I trust Vicky Nuland to call for peace in the Ukraiane tomorrow.

    What a fuck'n joke. THIS is who ZuckerBORG really is.

    https://nypost.com/2021/10/13/how-mark-zuckerberg-helped-dems-sway-the-2020-election/

    I get it, Andrew thinks he might find purchase and power for his narrative if he is restationed on more traditional sites where his opinion might, while somewhat modified, at least sway a few more goys into the light. Okay.

    You know what we should all do? Read Unz.com and lemme think, especially THIS article.

    https://www.unz.com/jfreud/correctly-naming-the-source-of-our-woes-is-the-first-step-in-the-road-to-recovery-do-you-have-the-courage-to-name-the-jewish-power-if-not-why-not-sentimentality-cowardice-opportunism/

    ZuckerBORG, now armed with his 22 Charter Arms Path Finder Lite Pink Lady in search of dangerous squirrels in the trees on his many properties now fancies himself Jim Corbett and a "Great White Hunter".

    This new, Big Tech acquiescence to the "Will Of The People" and the "vox populi" is again, a very definite "limited hangout" until the winds change and the Jews can once again, establish ever more control.

    ANYONE who believes for a second, that the Jew owners of Big Media, Big Tech and Big Business were not FULL AND WILLING participants in the censorship, cancellation and diminishment of our Constitutional rights, especially Free Speech over the last 10 years is a fuck'n idiot.

    Replies: @Bert

    The fuck’n idiot of course is Anglin, who can’t manage to enjoy the challenges presented to him by 21st century women but salivates copiously over Zuckerborg.

  • I was a surprised to find Mark Zuckerburg laying down blue plastic strips of some kind of flooring material. He carefully overlaid the edges of the strips around some kind of small tank. As he did so, he described in detail how this new flooring would work. I felt unconvinced.

    When I awoke, I pondered that bizarre dream I had this morning. Utter madness. Why him, of all people?

    Note: Zuckerburg has just had built a large, self-sufficient underground bunker. Everyone involved had to sign a NDA.

    His property used to be part of Taylor Camp back in the day. Elizabeth Taylor’s brother, Robert, gave a bunch of ‘hippies’ permission to live there and do as they like.

    They ran naked. I saw a toilet perched upon a wooden box standing up tall and unadorned in the air. Not appealing to me, so I walked on down the beach, searching for puka shells.

  • I clicked on this to read the article but I never, ever listen to Rogan. He is a total moron who will get lung cancer just like Rush.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Bert
    @Kaleb Kleinfelder

    It's interesting and also baffling that Rogan and Lex Friedman are simultaneously highly popular and so low-key as interviewers, almost to the point of appearing not all that smart. I attribute the paradox to the current zeitgeist's discomfort with straight talk, with refusing to accept bullshit, and with the idea that absolute truth actually exists.

    Replies: @Vagrant Rightist
  • I’ll believe Zuckerborg has changed when he:

    (1) makes amends for all the damage his censorship has caused (Covid deaths, Jansix show trials/jailings, Proud Boys debacle, Chauvin’s sacrifice, Charlottesville hoax; etc.) ;

    (2) openly admits that the Holocaust never happened (while hosting endless videos that debunk said Shoah Business claims);

    (3) details all Jew crimes;

    (4) admits that Jews are members of the Synagogue of Satan;

    (5) calls for Israel to disappear like the USSR;

    (6) cites all the valid reasons why Jews were expelled in the past; and

    (6) offers to rebuild Gaza.

    •ï¿½Agree: Pat Kittle
    •ï¿½Thanks: Bert
    •ï¿½Replies: @Pat Kittle
    @Lemmy Tellyuh


    I’ll believe Zuckerborg has changed when he:

    (1) makes amends for all the damage his censorship has caused (Covid deaths, Jansix show trials/jailings, Proud Boys debacle, Chauvin’s sacrifice, Charlottesville hoax; etc.) ;

    (2) openly admits that the Holocaust never happened (while hosting endless videos that debunk said Shoah Business claims);

    (3) details all Jew crimes;

    (4) admits that Jews are members of the Synagogue of Satan;

    (5) calls for Israel to disappear like the USSR;

    (6) cites all the valid reasons why Jews were expelled in the past; and

    (6) offers to rebuild Gaza.
    �
    I don't have the time or patience to listen to hours of Joe & Mark to find out whether they cut to the chase (I bet neither one did):

    Can we freely question the alleged "Holocaust"?

    If we can't, don't BS us about "free speech."
  • Ok Guys (any ladies out there too?), working on a beautiful poem and need your input (though a bit nervous to put myself out there….), here goes:

    First verse:

    Cocks
    Rock(s)!

    Cucks
    Suck(s)!

    Zuck
    Fucks!

    What do you think? (Please be gentle..)

  • Zuck the Schmuck! Just another Jew pretending to be important. Just another Jewish failure!

  • Gotta disagree with AA on estimation of Elon Musk’s intelligence. You don’t accomplish what he’s accomplished unless you are very smart. IQ-wise, and emotionally. Tesla. Spacex. Boring. The solar thing. Neurolink. Starlink. X. Just off the top of my stupid head.

    Now, look at other achievements of industrialists/tech people in history. Henry Ford. Thomas Edison. Philo T. Farnsworth. Alexander Graham Bell. Bill Gates. Zuckerberg. Bezos. They were all successful with about one thing. Exception being Edison maybe, but the inventions and marketing were along the same lines–electricity.

    Now, look at Musk. Look at that list of companies and achievements. Are they related? Not really, not totally. I struggle to find anyone else that keeps as many balls in the air and has success with each. He’s a once-in-a-many generation genius. Prove me wrong with another example.

    AA has Musk-envy.

    I haven’t listened to Zuck’s interview with Rogan, and probably won’t. Why not? Because Zuck is boring to listen to. Why? Because he’s full of shit. People that are full of shit are boring, if they don’t just piss you off.

    Meantime, every Musk interview or speech is interesting. Because he’s not full of shit. He talks about interesting stuff, in a very informed manner. He’s not always right, but he’s always honest. I’ve never sensed that he has a hidden agenda.

    Listen to Zuck, or Gates, or others of their ilk. You can’t stand to listen to them, because they are angling, always. Always full of shit for some agenda.

    For a really good analysis of Zuck’s instant conversion to Goldwater conservatism, listen to the All-In podcast #210, 1/10/25.

    Apparently, in a book no less, Trump threatened to prosecute and jail Zuck if he finds out Zuck did anything illegal.

    https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/31/politics/video/smr-trump-zuckerberg?utm_source=chatgpt.com

    Miracle! Zuck is instantly a Reaganite! What a toad.

    All these tech goobers, including Musk, should be watched carefully. Verified, then trusted.

    But at least Musk puts his money where his mouth is (like $44BB on Twitter), and buku donations to the Right. And he’s interesting, so probably not full of shit.

    •ï¿½Replies: @AlmaMater
    @Pamique

    Others says Musk is as phony as fiat currency.

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/TLBNQ5mnzOmC

    Replies: @Pamique
  • @chuck lowe
    BTW, Andrew's take on "Transhumanism" is illogical and makes no sense.

    Yes, we SHOULD be the Borg. Plus, we have no choice. As I have said, and, I am right -

    A.I., Artificial Intelligence-GPT-5 is scheduled for release sometime in 2025. The news is rife with documentaries, articles and predictions with respect to Artificial Intelligence and the effect this technology will have on the entire world. The hopes that AI will not just cure cancer and bring about world peace, is accompanied with the fear that AI will enslave, or, destroy humans in a self aware, "Judgment Day Terminator" type scenario. This is evoking some serious and deserved Sturm and Drang angst with the Hoi Polloi. We laymen are able to understand, that the minute AI Intelligence can write and modify it's own code and exponentially square it's own IQ, the horse that left the barn, might be a Pale Horse spitting fire.

    Tristan Harris (He is everywhere, podcasts, TED Talks etc.) Stanford University trained computer genius and Google ethicist, who is the tip of the spear in these discussions, is famous for his predictions and bona fides re: A.I. He says that A.I. will exponentially square it's IQ again and again and again ad infinitum in 2 or 3 years. 2 or 3 YEARS! He is calling for a halt to research and a world wide assessment of the possible dangers. That will never happen no matter what you hear from governments, or, "experts".

    Currently the arguments for a halt to research while scientists and nations assess the danger is risible. Those that think ANY nation on earth (Including America) is going to stop pushing for the best possible A.I. in the shortest amount of time are delusional and probably think Diogenes found an honest man in Jussie Smollett. Damn the torpedoes Boeing's baby needs new shoes!

    Those discussions and arguments, the attempt to assess the variables now, including the possibility of our own destruction, logically assume that we are clever and prescient enough in the present, to understand the variables in the future that will be determined by the AI intelligence we cannot hope to understand, that we fear will destroy us. Preposterous.

    Donald Rumsfeld was ridiculed for saying that "There are known knowns. There are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we do not know we don't know." He was actually right and his theorem is applicable here. These arguments assessing the level of A.I. and the extrapolations based on what is now, estimates for the level of AI intelligence and A.I.'s presumed actions in the future, is akin to a Latin First Declension discussion with a Neanderthal.

    A French philosopher, Pierre-Simon Laplace in 1814 created an imaginary entity that could know the precise location of every atom in the universe and postulated that with that knowledge and accessibility it could "determine" (He was a "Determinist".) every possible outcome in the universe. AI is projected to be that entity. That is a known known. After Laplace's death, his imaginary entity was referred to as, "Laplace's Demon". Keep that in mind.

    Let's go to our strength. Belief in a higher power and the knowledge that Quantum computing is here and here now. Andrew's faith in God, is not just a comfort to him, it is a comfort to us all.

    Blaise Pascal, another French philosopher is famous for his "Pascal's Gambit" argument. "Pascal's Gambit" presupposes that we don't know if there is a God, but, we bet there is one, in order to maintain order and, like Constantine on his death bed, hedge our bets(Constantine made offerings to several "Gods" as he died.). Get your money out. This wager is not an option.

    Gods, throughout history, the Christian God included, have changed from one civilization to the next. The new A.I. God, does not negate the old God. Sol Invictus is first cousin in the ecclesiastical sense, to the Judeo/Christian Religion. Are we meeting the new God, same as the old God, or, is the change merely superficial and subjective? Our God lives in our perception, ipso facto unchangeable and intrinsically knowable, no matter what the current state of religion and belief.

    Our hope for the future, as human beings, as a species, should be based on spirituality. That intrinsic, ethereal, yes, empirical knowledge of a higher power. There will be no Atheists in the coming A.I. foxhole.

    The really smart Pale Horse has left the barn, but A.I. isn't the only horse in the stable.

    Transhumanism is a technology, feared and loathed every bit as much as A.I. It is anathema to the Christian right and even antithetical to many on the left. It is scary and I understand why at first, your want it stopped dead in it's tracks.

    As I type, ribbon cables are being designed to pass over the damaged parts of a brain in order to stimulate undamaged parts so that stroke patients can walk and talk. That is nascent, but definable, Transhumanism.

    Occidental (Western) philosophy/religion is based on "Dualism". The "Indifferent God" that drove Hemmingway to suicide, is a harsh taskmaster. Oriental philosophy sees us all, the flora, the fauna, everything as "one". In the Orient, they think we all live our lives in our heads by way of the 5 senses and in fact, we ARE the seeing, the hearing, the tasting, the feeling, the smelling. If that is one aspect of what defines us, then could transcendence to a state so elevated by way of Brobdingnagian IQ's through A.I. bring us to the "Enlightenment" so cherished by the sages be a feature and not a bug?

    The question should be, are the Borg happy? Is resistance illogical?

    AI is NOT actual life. The emotions, the joy, love, hatred, sadness etc. which are part and parcel with everyone of us in this veil of tears, in any scenario, in my opinion, would be of interest to AI. This is logical, I think, now and in the future, based on the accepted universal desire of all sentient and non sentient things to survive. Belief in God, a higher power, is not just essential for the faithful, it is the sine qua non unspoken guarantee of eternal life that provides solace to us all, even if we pretend not to believe.

    The lack of belief in a higher power is petty narcissism fueled by fear and the solipsistic nature of our world. It is, ironically, transitory. The definition and the face of God changes for people throughout the universe as time goes by, but our God is a spiritual ziggurat in the end. We can only worship Kim Kardashian's ass until it falls. God, no matter your religion, is a constant.

    The self aware singularity of A.I. in the foreseeable future, would logically include an aspect of "self" preservation. The spark of life, unattainable for AI, is worthy of interest, especially to an entity, a force, an IQ that has no hope of acquiring that spark unless it is married, on a cellular level, to that force, that life, which, no matter how exponentially squared, A.I. cannot produce, only meld. The gradual assimilation of the combination of AI & Transhuman characteristics is at hand.

    "We have the technology". You will be, "The 6 Million Dollar Man", a technical Vulcan mind meld. Maybe we will own everything and be happy.

    This is not an attack on your "identity" it is the elevation of that "identity" that might bring us closer to our "God".

    Replies: @Redpill Boomer, @Half Norwegian, @c matt, @Rurik

    The idea that AI is in any way self-aware or could “take over” is laughable. I say this as a computer engineer who works with the technology every day.

    •ï¿½Replies: @chuck lowe
    @Redpill Boomer

    Thanks for the comment.
  • Joe Rogan had on Irish Christian hero Saint Mel, and I think we should call him Saint Mel, because he is going to be sainted officially at some point but that can’t happen until you’re dead. Most of the interview is about Christianity directly, and all of it is tangentially related to Mel’s faith. Although...
  • Piglet says:
    @FTB
    @SteveK9

    Our involvement began much earlier during our Secret War in Laos that was waged against North Vietnamese supply lines as early as 1963.

    My father was a helicopter door gunner. That was the beginning of using choppers as a gunship platform. He never admitted to being in ground combat but he told me what an M14 Main Battle Rifle could do to a human target. This was before the M14s was phased out in favor of the M16s.

    As for JFK, he wanted to have a detente with the USSR, and eventually, Communist China because he figured that despite deploring their forms of government, war between nuclear powers would be insane.

    Contrast that with today's unhinged, satanic pedophiles in D.C. who are picking a fight with Russia and China; the world's largest and third largest nuclear powers.

    Replies: @Piglet

    Most people don’t realize how far back the US began getting involved in Vietnam. The Vietnamese had been under the heel of the French since the 1800s and had had enough. They asked us for help in keeping the French from returning after the end of the WW II Japanese occupation and letting them gain their independence. Naturally, the US did the exact opposite. When the French returned, they were wearing US-made uniforms and helmets, carrying US-made weapons, driving US-made jeeps, trucks, tanks, etc. Perhaps US “leadership” was looking at the “big picture” and trying to ensure French cooperation in the early days of the Cold War in Europe, and going against the French return to Vietnam might have complicated that effort.

    If you look at the histories of USAF airlift wings (back then called troop carrier wings), you’ll often find their direct involvement in the French war effort. The US had airlift power the French lacked, and it provided the French with help to make up the difference.

    I recall a picture of French troops departing Korea for Vietnam in 1953. The truce had been declared, but there was no going home quite yet! They were wearing US uniforms, to include the shoulder patch of the US Army’s 2d Infantry Division to which they, as a unit, had been attached.

    Wars are expensive and France, still recovering from WW II, was assisted by the US which paid up to 80% of the costs of the French war effort. Even when the French wanted to finally leave, the US pushed them onward.

    In 1954 the French were getting their fannies handed to them at Dien Bien Phu. At one point US leadership seriously considered direct US involvement by dropping the 187th Airborne Regimental Combat Team into the French camp to assist in the battle. (The 187th ARCT had made two combat jumps in the Korean War.) Major General “Jumping Jim” Gavin of WW II 82d Airborne Division fame took a hard look at the situation and advised against it. As a columnist writing for the 187th ARCT veterans association later wrote, “They listened to Gavin then. Later they forgot what he said, and we know how that turned out.”

    When the Pentagon Papers were published, it revealed that American presidents going back to Truman had been lying to the American public about the US government’s true intentions in Vietnam. These days we expect presidents to lie to us, but back then it probably came as more of a surprise.

    •ï¿½Thanks: Felpudinho
  • The day after the amazing appearance by Mel Gibson, Joe Rogan had on Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg for an interview that was also good (though not quite as good). Zuck needs some kind of cool name, such as “Deathstroke†or some such. I agree with most of what he expressed in this interview. He appears...
  • motherzucker

    we smell a rat

  • Joe Rogan had on Irish Christian hero Saint Mel, and I think we should call him Saint Mel, because he is going to be sainted officially at some point but that can’t happen until you’re dead. Most of the interview is about Christianity directly, and all of it is tangentially related to Mel’s faith. Although...
  • @ThreeCranes
    @anarchore

    Agree. Once you accept the proposition that God in becoming incarnate chose a Jew as his boy, you've pretty much bought into the whole notion of Jews being this incredible, special people, God's chosen. Once you've granted them this power over you, you are to all intents and purposes, a slave. Lame.

    A Christian forsakes his Greco-Roman heritage and his Germanic as well, offering them up for sacrifice on the Abrahamic altar.

    "Here, take my first-born son (our pre-Christian, pagan celebrations of our own people) and I'll console myself instead with your castoff, tortured, God-man-boy-son whose own Fathers ostracized him. Such a good deal! Thanks! I'm (literally) eternally grateful."

    Replies: @Piffle, @Wokechoke

    I disagree. Christianity looks very much like a way to Troll the Jews. A way to troll their conception of salvation and a Saviour.

    The idea of incarnating The God into human flesh is a huge insulting swipe at the Jews.

  • @Jefferson Temple
    @Wokechoke

    No, it was Gibson.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Wokechoke

    Correct.

  • The day after the amazing appearance by Mel Gibson, Joe Rogan had on Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg for an interview that was also good (though not quite as good). Zuck needs some kind of cool name, such as “Deathstroke†or some such. I agree with most of what he expressed in this interview. He appears...
  • Rurik says:
    @Anonymous534
    Why should you believe anything this Jew says?

    It really does look like the entire culture has shifted dramatically. I think we definitely need to note that this was clearly allowed to happen, presumably because the government feared some kind of violent uprising. However, even though it was allowed to happen, there are opportunities being presented by the changes in the culture.
    �
    Yes, opportunities for the same people who were destroying your culture to remain in power. The elites will tell you anything you want to hear, as they fleece you and send you to fight in another pointless war, and wear any costume you want to keep you from bringing out the pitchforks.

    The the entire culture has shifted dramatically, it made 10 steps forward towards Satanic degeneracy and normalization of anti-White hatred and 1 step back. Big win, eh?

    Replies: @Rurik

    the Jew wants the goyim to speak freely, and not self-censor.

    To speak more freely like they do on TikTok, where the value of the espionage/data is far greater, because it’s more ingenuous.

    Only in the case of TikTok, the ones accumulating the data are not doing so with the mandate to genocide the people they’re spying on. Only in advancing the interests of China, which unlike Zukerburg, isn’t fanatically obsessed with subjugating and genociding white people.

    I’d trust TikTok a thousand times before I’d trust Zukerburg, even if he got a Charlie Manson-type swastika tattooed to his forehead.

    ‘ve have to be smart about zis. Ve have to make ze goyim zink he can say vat he vants to. Trick ze goyim, dats’ the vay.

    •ï¿½Agree: Pat Kittle
  • Joe Rogan had on Irish Christian hero Saint Mel, and I think we should call him Saint Mel, because he is going to be sainted officially at some point but that can’t happen until you’re dead. Most of the interview is about Christianity directly, and all of it is tangentially related to Mel’s faith. Although...
  • Anonymous[390] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:

    Mel also said Anthony Fauci should be in prison and apparently suggested he could be executed, and this is also obvious.

    Is Fauci enough? when looking at the millions of whites he killed should not Fauci and all his children and wives and brothers be executed too?

  • The day after the amazing appearance by Mel Gibson, Joe Rogan had on Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg for an interview that was also good (though not quite as good). Zuck needs some kind of cool name, such as “Deathstroke†or some such. I agree with most of what he expressed in this interview. He appears...
  • BTW, Andrew’s take on “Transhumanism” is illogical and makes no sense.

    Yes, we SHOULD be the Borg. Plus, we have no choice. As I have said, and, I am right –

    A.I., Artificial Intelligence-GPT-5 is scheduled for release sometime in 2025. The news is rife with documentaries, articles and predictions with respect to Artificial Intelligence and the effect this technology will have on the entire world. The hopes that AI will not just cure cancer and bring about world peace, is accompanied with the fear that AI will enslave, or, destroy humans in a self aware, “Judgment Day Terminator” type scenario. This is evoking some serious and deserved Sturm and Drang angst with the Hoi Polloi. We laymen are able to understand, that the minute AI Intelligence can write and modify it’s own code and exponentially square it’s own IQ, the horse that left the barn, might be a Pale Horse spitting fire.

    Tristan Harris (He is everywhere, podcasts, TED Talks etc.) Stanford University trained computer genius and Google ethicist, who is the tip of the spear in these discussions, is famous for his predictions and bona fides re: A.I. He says that A.I. will exponentially square it’s IQ again and again and again ad infinitum in 2 or 3 years. 2 or 3 YEARS! He is calling for a halt to research and a world wide assessment of the possible dangers. That will never happen no matter what you hear from governments, or, “experts”.

    Currently the arguments for a halt to research while scientists and nations assess the danger is risible. Those that think ANY nation on earth (Including America) is going to stop pushing for the best possible A.I. in the shortest amount of time are delusional and probably think Diogenes found an honest man in Jussie Smollett. Damn the torpedoes Boeing’s baby needs new shoes!

    Those discussions and arguments, the attempt to assess the variables now, including the possibility of our own destruction, logically assume that we are clever and prescient enough in the present, to understand the variables in the future that will be determined by the AI intelligence we cannot hope to understand, that we fear will destroy us. Preposterous.

    Donald Rumsfeld was ridiculed for saying that “There are known knowns. There are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we now know we don’t know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we do not know we don’t know.” He was actually right and his theorem is applicable here. These arguments assessing the level of A.I. and the extrapolations based on what is now, estimates for the level of AI intelligence and A.I.’s presumed actions in the future, is akin to a Latin First Declension discussion with a Neanderthal.

    A French philosopher, Pierre-Simon Laplace in 1814 created an imaginary entity that could know the precise location of every atom in the universe and postulated that with that knowledge and accessibility it could “determine” (He was a “Determinist”.) every possible outcome in the universe. AI is projected to be that entity. That is a known known. After Laplace’s death, his imaginary entity was referred to as, “Laplace’s Demon”. Keep that in mind.

    Let’s go to our strength. Belief in a higher power and the knowledge that Quantum computing is here and here now. Andrew’s faith in God, is not just a comfort to him, it is a comfort to us all.

    Blaise Pascal, another French philosopher is famous for his “Pascal’s Gambit” argument. “Pascal’s Gambit” presupposes that we don’t know if there is a God, but, we bet there is one, in order to maintain order and, like Constantine on his death bed, hedge our bets(Constantine made offerings to several “Gods” as he died.). Get your money out. This wager is not an option.

    Gods, throughout history, the Christian God included, have changed from one civilization to the next. The new A.I. God, does not negate the old God. Sol Invictus is first cousin in the ecclesiastical sense, to the Judeo/Christian Religion. Are we meeting the new God, same as the old God, or, is the change merely superficial and subjective? Our God lives in our perception, ipso facto unchangeable and intrinsically knowable, no matter what the current state of religion and belief.

    Our hope for the future, as human beings, as a species, should be based on spirituality. That intrinsic, ethereal, yes, empirical knowledge of a higher power. There will be no Atheists in the coming A.I. foxhole.

    The really smart Pale Horse has left the barn, but A.I. isn’t the only horse in the stable.

    Transhumanism is a technology, feared and loathed every bit as much as A.I. It is anathema to the Christian right and even antithetical to many on the left. It is scary and I understand why at first, your want it stopped dead in it’s tracks.

    As I type, ribbon cables are being designed to pass over the damaged parts of a brain in order to stimulate undamaged parts so that stroke patients can walk and talk. That is nascent, but definable, Transhumanism.

    Occidental (Western) philosophy/religion is based on “Dualism”. The “Indifferent God” that drove Hemmingway to suicide, is a harsh taskmaster. Oriental philosophy sees us all, the flora, the fauna, everything as “one”. In the Orient, they think we all live our lives in our heads by way of the 5 senses and in fact, we ARE the seeing, the hearing, the tasting, the feeling, the smelling. If that is one aspect of what defines us, then could transcendence to a state so elevated by way of Brobdingnagian IQ’s through A.I. bring us to the “Enlightenment” so cherished by the sages be a feature and not a bug?

    The question should be, are the Borg happy? Is resistance illogical?

    AI is NOT actual life. The emotions, the joy, love, hatred, sadness etc. which are part and parcel with everyone of us in this veil of tears, in any scenario, in my opinion, would be of interest to AI. This is logical, I think, now and in the future, based on the accepted universal desire of all sentient and non sentient things to survive. Belief in God, a higher power, is not just essential for the faithful, it is the sine qua non unspoken guarantee of eternal life that provides solace to us all, even if we pretend not to believe.

    The lack of belief in a higher power is petty narcissism fueled by fear and the solipsistic nature of our world. It is, ironically, transitory. The definition and the face of God changes for people throughout the universe as time goes by, but our God is a spiritual ziggurat in the end. We can only worship Kim Kardashian’s ass until it falls. God, no matter your religion, is a constant.

    The self aware singularity of A.I. in the foreseeable future, would logically include an aspect of “self” preservation. The spark of life, unattainable for AI, is worthy of interest, especially to an entity, a force, an IQ that has no hope of acquiring that spark unless it is married, on a cellular level, to that force, that life, which, no matter how exponentially squared, A.I. cannot produce, only meld. The gradual assimilation of the combination of AI & Transhuman characteristics is at hand.

    “We have the technology”. You will be, “The 6 Million Dollar Man”, a technical Vulcan mind meld. Maybe we will own everything and be happy.

    This is not an attack on your “identity” it is the elevation of that “identity” that might bring us closer to our “God”.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Redpill Boomer
    @chuck lowe

    The idea that AI is in any way self-aware or could "take over" is laughable. I say this as a computer engineer who works with the technology every day.

    Replies: @chuck lowe
    , @Half Norwegian
    @chuck lowe

    Laplace is entirely contradicted by quantum mechanics. Your ramblings betray a complete misunderstanding of the topic.

    Replies: @chuck lowe
    , @c matt
    @chuck lowe


    Occidental (Western) philosophy/religion is based on “Dualismâ€.
    �
    Dualism was condemned as heresy by the Western Church, so where do you get Western religion is "based" on it?

    Replies: @chuck lowe
    , @Rurik
    @chuck lowe

    Thank you for the thoughtful comment, Chuck

    I do wonder, however, if we aren't projecting a bit, when we wonder if AI will develop an id, or an ego.

    We have things like ambition and religion because we're organic beings, and I suspect that is the only way to have or get them.

    but I sure the heck am no expert.
  • I trust Mark ZuckerBORG about as much as I trust Vicky Nuland to call for peace in the Ukraiane tomorrow.

    What a fuck’n joke. THIS is who ZuckerBORG really is.

    https://nypost.com/2021/10/13/how-mark-zuckerberg-helped-dems-sway-the-2020-election/

    I get it, Andrew thinks he might find purchase and power for his narrative if he is restationed on more traditional sites where his opinion might, while somewhat modified, at least sway a few more goys into the light. Okay.

    You know what we should all do? Read Unz.com and lemme think, especially THIS article.

    https://www.unz.com/jfreud/correctly-naming-the-source-of-our-woes-is-the-first-step-in-the-road-to-recovery-do-you-have-the-courage-to-name-the-jewish-power-if-not-why-not-sentimentality-cowardice-opportunism/

    ZuckerBORG, now armed with his 22 Charter Arms Path Finder Lite Pink Lady in search of dangerous squirrels in the trees on his many properties now fancies himself Jim Corbett and a “Great White Hunter”.

    This new, Big Tech acquiescence to the “Will Of The People” and the “vox populi” is again, a very definite “limited hangout” until the winds change and the Jews can once again, establish ever more control.

    ANYONE who believes for a second, that the Jew owners of Big Media, Big Tech and Big Business were not FULL AND WILLING participants in the censorship, cancellation and diminishment of our Constitutional rights, especially Free Speech over the last 10 years is a fuck’n idiot.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Bert
    @chuck lowe

    The fuck'n idiot of course is Anglin, who can't manage to enjoy the challenges presented to him by 21st century women but salivates copiously over Zuckerborg.
  • @Rich
    The wind has blown a little right of center so Zuckerberg has pretended to drift right of center. When they elect Hilary next time, he'll go back to being pro-censorship. These guys are all afraid Trump is coming for them after the way they went after him.

    Replies: @Vagrant Rightist, @Commentator Mike

    Some unfortunate truth in this. It’s not a bad truth, sure take advantage of any goods that appear, but these characters will go whatever way the wind is blowing to survive.

    Another George Floyd could set things back again very quickly.

    As for AI,- it doesn’t need to be sentient in the way humans are to destroy the planet. It just needs to be connected to important things and where its outputs make decisions.

  • If it’s possible any longer to believe in the sincerity of human beings, I believe that Zuckerberg is sincerely a changed man. It appears to be a change that has been occurring for some time and was finally triggered into substance by the brutal behavior of the Democrats.

    I’m sure he had some rosy opinion of Democrats that was severely disillusioned.

    •ï¿½Replies: @purrturbed
    @Emslander


    If it’s possible any longer to believe in the sincerity of human beings, I believe that Zuckerberg is sincerely a changed man.
    �
    He's a judeo-sociopath and power recognizes power. Maybe a top tier NPC. Doesn't amount to anything more than that.

    (it's a somewhat interesting interview, but still .. )
  • Joe Rogan had on Irish Christian hero Saint Mel, and I think we should call him Saint Mel, because he is going to be sainted officially at some point but that can’t happen until you’re dead. Most of the interview is about Christianity directly, and all of it is tangentially related to Mel’s faith. Although...
  • @Anonymous
    @Emslander

    The Catholic church is from Satan. Just believe in Christ instead of gay pedo priests. Belief that only a faggot priest can turn a piece of bread literally into Christ is literal retardation. Mel ought to just become a Baptist.

    Replies: @Piffle, @Emslander, @Godly533

    If you believe such a thing, then you are from Satan. Read the New Testament, Rube.

  • The day after the amazing appearance by Mel Gibson, Joe Rogan had on Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg for an interview that was also good (though not quite as good). Zuck needs some kind of cool name, such as “Deathstroke†or some such. I agree with most of what he expressed in this interview. He appears...
  • The wind has blown a little right of center so Zuckerberg has pretended to drift right of center. When they elect Hilary next time, he’ll go back to being pro-censorship. These guys are all afraid Trump is coming for them after the way they went after him.

    •ï¿½Agree: Old Prude, c matt
    •ï¿½Replies: @Vagrant Rightist
    @Rich

    Some unfortunate truth in this. It's not a bad truth, sure take advantage of any goods that appear, but these characters will go whatever way the wind is blowing to survive.

    Another George Floyd could set things back again very quickly.


    As for AI,- it doesn't need to be sentient in the way humans are to destroy the planet. It just needs to be connected to important things and where its outputs make decisions.
    , @Commentator Mike
    @Rich

    Trump's massive win may have shifted the Overton window, and Vance, or Kennedy, Carlson, etc., may follow him to keep out the Democrats for a long time, and even the Democrats may change with time. But of course, to fundamentally change the system, they all have to go, but who's going to do that?
  • i’m usually a fan of anglin’s work but i dunno after reading this. he’s definitely all over “zuck’s” schmeckle here… wtf.

  • Given that both of these men’s companies are creations of the USA intelligence/military/industrial complex, what does this tell us? They are trying to earn the public’s trust again to screw us in some other way, like sending southern white boys off to the ME to die for Israel and start WWIII with Iran.

    Maybe they’ve even decided they need to genuinely take their boot off our throats for awhile so the parasite doesn’t completely kill the host. Or maybe since they can’t completely control the narrative anymore, they just need to create chaos and doubt everywhere. It’s wait and see right now.

    •ï¿½Agree: Bert
  • This is the stupidest AA post of all time.

  • Joe Rogan had on Irish Christian hero Saint Mel, and I think we should call him Saint Mel, because he is going to be sainted officially at some point but that can’t happen until you’re dead. Most of the interview is about Christianity directly, and all of it is tangentially related to Mel’s faith. Although...
  • @FTB
    @Dutch Boy

    Actually, a lot of the Crusades were waged against the Orthodox Church.

    Replies: @Piffle

    Actually, a lot of the Crusades were waged against the Orthodox Church.

    The “Everything Bad is Still the fault of the Catholic Church” history “hot takes” is why many US based Protestants convert to Orthodoxy.

  • The day after the amazing appearance by Mel Gibson, Joe Rogan had on Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg for an interview that was also good (though not quite as good). Zuck needs some kind of cool name, such as “Deathstroke†or some such. I agree with most of what he expressed in this interview. He appears...
  • I didn’t believe in space aliens until I saw a picture of Zuckerman for the first time.

  • Joe Rogan had on Irish Christian hero Saint Mel, and I think we should call him Saint Mel, because he is going to be sainted officially at some point but that can’t happen until you’re dead. Most of the interview is about Christianity directly, and all of it is tangentially related to Mel’s faith. Although...
  • joe biden is Irish.

  • The day after the amazing appearance by Mel Gibson, Joe Rogan had on Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg for an interview that was also good (though not quite as good). Zuck needs some kind of cool name, such as “Deathstroke†or some such. I agree with most of what he expressed in this interview. He appears...
  • I love AAs work, but the first 2/3 of this article read like a rambling AI text. The summation was great though.

  • Why should you believe anything this Jew says?

    It really does look like the entire culture has shifted dramatically. I think we definitely need to note that this was clearly allowed to happen, presumably because the government feared some kind of violent uprising. However, even though it was allowed to happen, there are opportunities being presented by the changes in the culture.

    Yes, opportunities for the same people who were destroying your culture to remain in power. The elites will tell you anything you want to hear, as they fleece you and send you to fight in another pointless war, and wear any costume you want to keep you from bringing out the pitchforks.

    The the entire culture has shifted dramatically, it made 10 steps forward towards Satanic degeneracy and normalization of anti-White hatred and 1 step back. Big win, eh?

    •ï¿½Agree: Rurik, c matt
    •ï¿½Thanks: Armageddon
    •ï¿½Replies: @Rurik
    @Anonymous534

    the Jew wants the goyim to speak freely, and not self-censor.

    To speak more freely like they do on TikTok, where the value of the espionage/data is far greater, because it's more ingenuous.

    Only in the case of TikTok, the ones accumulating the data are not doing so with the mandate to genocide the people they're spying on. Only in advancing the interests of China, which unlike Zukerburg, isn't fanatically obsessed with subjugating and genociding white people.

    I'd trust TikTok a thousand times before I'd trust Zukerburg, even if he got a Charlie Manson-type swastika tattooed to his forehead.

    've have to be smart about zis. Ve have to make ze goyim zink he can say vat he vants to. Trick ze goyim, dats' the vay.

    https://static.timesofisrael.com/www/uploads/2020/11/F200814DC07-e1604230529478-640x400.jpg
  • Joe Rogan had on Irish Christian hero Saint Mel, and I think we should call him Saint Mel, because he is going to be sainted officially at some point but that can’t happen until you’re dead. Most of the interview is about Christianity directly, and all of it is tangentially related to Mel’s faith. Although...
  • @FTB
    @Commentator Mike

    How can anyone not like these kinds of movies?

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/T2Z6uYGCprjp

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Commentator Mike

    I don’t dislike all war films but I didn’t think much of Braveheart. I don’t think I ever watched all of it, just bits of it. I saw all of Apocalypto and I suppose it wasn’t too bad as a film but I couldn’t see the point of it. So a bunch of more cruel and efficient murderers with White skins turned up in some ships at the end. Not as if they came to save anybody. But I guess the final scene did make some point. I’m used to Mel Gibson being an actor of entertaining films so when he tries to do something more serious and deep, it doesn’t ring with me. Charlton Heston was one of the greats.

  • @FTB
    @Commentator Mike

    How can anyone not like these kinds of movies?

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/T2Z6uYGCprjp

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Commentator Mike

    I remember that one. The civilising Norman castellan.

  • @Phibbs
    " The Theory of Evolution is a lie." I don't think so. The huge differences between Negros, Asians and whites took at least 100,000 years to develop. Neanderthals were in Europe 200,000 years before modern people arrived. Evidence of ancient, pre-human civilizations abound. The most reasonable belief is that God -- or maybe aliens -- guided the evolution of man from monkeys to homo sapiens. But what kind of god is it that created Negros, who are ugly, stupid and have no self-discipline? I'll tell you what kind of god did that: a sadistic one. Anyone who worships the Jewish god or the Christian god is worshiping an arbitrary and aloof god.
    On a final note, almost all the Born-Again Christians I know are cheering on the genocide of the Palestinians by the Jews. This is because Born-Again Christians worship Israel and the Jews. Obviously, the god of the Jews and evangelicals is a very nefarious god indeed!

    Replies: @Johnny LeBlanc

    White, purple-haired, child-molesting woketards and self-loathing born-again White Christian Jew lickspittles are two sides of the same coin. Both worship destructive deities, both engage in self-destructive virtue signaling, both love two-legged turds from the far corners of the Earth more than their own race, both are manipulated by Jews into self-destruction.

  • FTB says:
    @SteveK9
    @Rich


    And JFK gave us Vietnam and LBJ
    �
    Not quite fair. Vietnam was barely starting and no one knows what JFK would have done. There are those who think he was going to pull that plug. And, he hardly 'gave us' LBJ, considering Johnson was very likely part of the conspiracy to murder him.

    Replies: @Observator, @Rich, @FTB

    Our involvement began much earlier during our Secret War in Laos that was waged against North Vietnamese supply lines as early as 1963.

    My father was a helicopter door gunner. That was the beginning of using choppers as a gunship platform. He never admitted to being in ground combat but he told me what an M14 Main Battle Rifle could do to a human target. This was before the M14s was phased out in favor of the M16s.

    As for JFK, he wanted to have a detente with the USSR, and eventually, Communist China because he figured that despite deploring their forms of government, war between nuclear powers would be insane.

    Contrast that with today’s unhinged, satanic pedophiles in D.C. who are picking a fight with Russia and China; the world’s largest and third largest nuclear powers.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Piglet
    @FTB

    Most people don't realize how far back the US began getting involved in Vietnam. The Vietnamese had been under the heel of the French since the 1800s and had had enough. They asked us for help in keeping the French from returning after the end of the WW II Japanese occupation and letting them gain their independence. Naturally, the US did the exact opposite. When the French returned, they were wearing US-made uniforms and helmets, carrying US-made weapons, driving US-made jeeps, trucks, tanks, etc. Perhaps US "leadership" was looking at the "big picture" and trying to ensure French cooperation in the early days of the Cold War in Europe, and going against the French return to Vietnam might have complicated that effort.

    If you look at the histories of USAF airlift wings (back then called troop carrier wings), you'll often find their direct involvement in the French war effort. The US had airlift power the French lacked, and it provided the French with help to make up the difference.

    I recall a picture of French troops departing Korea for Vietnam in 1953. The truce had been declared, but there was no going home quite yet! They were wearing US uniforms, to include the shoulder patch of the US Army's 2d Infantry Division to which they, as a unit, had been attached.

    Wars are expensive and France, still recovering from WW II, was assisted by the US which paid up to 80% of the costs of the French war effort. Even when the French wanted to finally leave, the US pushed them onward.

    In 1954 the French were getting their fannies handed to them at Dien Bien Phu. At one point US leadership seriously considered direct US involvement by dropping the 187th Airborne Regimental Combat Team into the French camp to assist in the battle. (The 187th ARCT had made two combat jumps in the Korean War.) Major General "Jumping Jim" Gavin of WW II 82d Airborne Division fame took a hard look at the situation and advised against it. As a columnist writing for the 187th ARCT veterans association later wrote, "They listened to Gavin then. Later they forgot what he said, and we know how that turned out."

    When the Pentagon Papers were published, it revealed that American presidents going back to Truman had been lying to the American public about the US government's true intentions in Vietnam. These days we expect presidents to lie to us, but back then it probably came as more of a surprise.
  • @Dumbo

    One thing I have complained about before regarding Mel is that since being blacklisted by Jews, he does these B movies which are not great.
    �
    Did he make anything good since Apocalypto? It doesn't seem so. Of course, making that type of historical movies, which seems to be Mel's strength, costs lots of money.

    I would watch the interview out of curiosity but I can't stand Rogan, or his ads.

    Replies: @Jefferson Temple, @Anonymous, @SteveK9, @Richard B

    I would watch the interview out of curiosity but I can’t stand Rogan, or his ads.

    Agreed!

    AA on AA:

    It has like a 0.001% success rate.

    As if a group that calls itself Anonymous keeps a record who who has relapsed.

    AA is ok.

    AA the shitposter is a ding dong.

  • @Commentator Mike
    In one movie he denigrated some Amerindians killing each other while in another he glorified some Whites killing other Whites. Primitives killing each other looked bad but Whites doing it was somehow civilisational. Didn't much like either film.

    Replies: @FTB

    How can anyone not like these kinds of movies?



    Video Link

    •ï¿½Replies: @Wokechoke
    @FTB

    I remember that one. The civilising Norman castellan.
    , @Commentator Mike
    @FTB

    I don't dislike all war films but I didn't think much of Braveheart. I don't think I ever watched all of it, just bits of it. I saw all of Apocalypto and I suppose it wasn't too bad as a film but I couldn't see the point of it. So a bunch of more cruel and efficient murderers with White skins turned up in some ships at the end. Not as if they came to save anybody. But I guess the final scene did make some point. I'm used to Mel Gibson being an actor of entertaining films so when he tries to do something more serious and deep, it doesn't ring with me. Charlton Heston was one of the greats.
  • @Dutch Boy
    @Wokechoke

    Unfortunately, Ed's main military activities were against the Scots, not the Saracens.

    Replies: @FTB

    Actually, a lot of the Crusades were waged against the Orthodox Church.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Piffle
    @FTB


    Actually, a lot of the Crusades were waged against the Orthodox Church.
    �
    The "Everything Bad is Still the fault of the Catholic Church" history "hot takes" is why many US based Protestants convert to Orthodoxy.
  • @Renard

    I am 100% against Darwin evolution theory, which I think is retarded and disproven, but I think the Earth is probably pretty old and I don’t think this belief is in conflict with the Bible.
    �
    Just to clarify, Anglin is talking about the Jewish Bible (Torah) which comprises much of what fundamentalist Christians call the Old Testament.

    So we have AA denying evolution and relying on Jewish scripture. OK then.

    Replies: @Dumbo, @Catdompanj, @anarchore, @peripatetic commenter

    There is a lot of evidence that fixation of large changes are unlikely, and this model suggests how it probably worked:

    Human origins: Are we hybrids?

    It seems likely that hybridization has been the mechanism for speciation for a long time.

  • Mel Gibson donates six figures per year to jewish charities. He bought the film rights to the USS Liberty survivors’ story, to purposely make sure it never got made.

  • @ANON
    @Dumbo


    You don’t need to be a “fundamentalist Christian†or to follow any kind of religion to disprove Darwin’s theory of “evolution of species by natural (sexual) selection of random mutationsâ€. It’s a stupid theory. In the future it will be seen as something almost as dated as Freud’s dumb theories.
    �
    Said the absolute retarded moron who has no idea what the fuck he's talking about.

    TUR is hilarious. You can't make this shit up.

    Replies: @Katrinka

    Darwin admitted, at the end of his life, that the theory of evolution was flawed.

  • @Johnny LeBlanc
    Mel's house in Malibu burned down. God's judgement, IMHO, for consorting with Jews.

    More of such devastation is forthcoming, for all of us. Contradict the Natural Order, and the consequences are severe.

    Replies: @Sharonbaron, @Wokechoke, @Katrinka

    Gibson had the house for sale for a long time. I guess none of the Hollywood libturds wanted to purchase a home owned by an anti Semite. Mel will make out OK. He’ll get the insurance money and move somewhere else. He has a home in Costa Rica, too.

  • looks like he’s trying to justify his backsliding

    In “Annie Hall,†Woody Allen explained to Annie that “ A shark has to keep moving forward, or it will die. What our relationship is now, Annie, is a dead shark.†That’s it, Woody!…marriage is like a shark. Progress, not backsliding. As an ancient ocean lifeguard, I fully agree, because, what does drowning look like? Well, several things, but the big one is “a failure to make progress.â€

  • In one movie he denigrated some Amerindians killing each other while in another he glorified some Whites killing other Whites. Primitives killing each other looked bad but Whites doing it was somehow civilisational. Didn’t much like either film.

    •ï¿½Disagree: Rurik
    •ï¿½Replies: @FTB
    @Commentator Mike

    How can anyone not like these kinds of movies?

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/T2Z6uYGCprjp

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Commentator Mike
  • ANON[144] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:
    @Dumbo
    @Renard

    You don't need to be a "fundamentalist Christian" or to follow any kind of religion to disprove Darwin's theory of "evolution of species by natural (sexual) selection of random mutations". It's a stupid theory. In the future it will be seen as something almost as dated as Freud's dumb theories.

    The Torah refers to some books of the "Old Testament" but not all. In any case the important Jewish texts are in the Talmud, not the Torah. Their laws are in the Talmud.

    Replies: @SteveK9, @ANON

    You don’t need to be a “fundamentalist Christian†or to follow any kind of religion to disprove Darwin’s theory of “evolution of species by natural (sexual) selection of random mutationsâ€. It’s a stupid theory. In the future it will be seen as something almost as dated as Freud’s dumb theories.

    Said the absolute retarded moron who has no idea what the fuck he’s talking about.

    TUR is hilarious. You can’t make this shit up.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Katrinka
    @ANON

    Darwin admitted, at the end of his life, that the theory of evolution was flawed.
  • AA is a pretty unique cult in that it has no leaders, no dogma, no dues, owns no lavish properties and advises its members to also go wherever else they want that helps them stay sober. Its founding members were raised Christian, so they naturally employed the language of that faith to describe what they personally interpreted as the work of that ancient deity. But they understood that many had no interest in that or any faith, so all religious literature is banned at meetings, while members are encouraged to pursue in their private lives whatever beliefs work best for them. Ego deflation is the central idea of AA, as it is of other spiritual traditions that have a mature understanding of human nature. Contras at this with mainstream Christianity, which is premised on unquestioning obedience to inflexible rules, for the entirely self-centered goal of avoiding punishment and earning reward, while scornfully judging nonbelievers. And its success rate is higher than the new for-profit “science based” recovery mills that promise painless instant cures while bilking health insurers for millions.

  • @SteveK9
    @Rich


    And JFK gave us Vietnam and LBJ
    �
    Not quite fair. Vietnam was barely starting and no one knows what JFK would have done. There are those who think he was going to pull that plug. And, he hardly 'gave us' LBJ, considering Johnson was very likely part of the conspiracy to murder him.

    Replies: @Observator, @Rich, @FTB

    JFK went from 800 troops when he took office to over 16k by the time he was killed. Whether he was planning on removing them, he never did and we’ll never know if he ever would have. We do know he increased the amount by 20x. Big numbers.

  • @ThreeCranes
    @anarchore

    Agree. Once you accept the proposition that God in becoming incarnate chose a Jew as his boy, you've pretty much bought into the whole notion of Jews being this incredible, special people, God's chosen. Once you've granted them this power over you, you are to all intents and purposes, a slave. Lame.

    A Christian forsakes his Greco-Roman heritage and his Germanic as well, offering them up for sacrifice on the Abrahamic altar.

    "Here, take my first-born son (our pre-Christian, pagan celebrations of our own people) and I'll console myself instead with your castoff, tortured, God-man-boy-son whose own Fathers ostracized him. Such a good deal! Thanks! I'm (literally) eternally grateful."

    Replies: @Piffle, @Wokechoke

    Once you accept the proposition that God in becoming incarnate chose a Jew as his boy, you’ve pretty much bought into the whole notion of Jews being this incredible, special people, God’s chosen. Once you’ve granted them this power over you, you are to all intents and purposes, a slave. Lame.

    Jesus didn’t Incarnate as a Jew. He’s fully man, which suggests that physically He’s the New Adam. Also, knowing that it was the Israelites not the Judahites (Jews) that were the chosen people. Also knowing that the Israelite nation was gone physically from the planet by about 70AD. There’s no Levitical priesthood, no other tribe around except supposed “Jews”. Jesus predicted the destruction and the destruction was final.

    In other words, knowing actual Christian theology and the OT rather than the “Everyone in the OT/NT was a Jew, yes” is a huge help.

    •ï¿½Troll: Half Norwegian
  • @Anonymous
    @Emslander

    The Catholic church is from Satan. Just believe in Christ instead of gay pedo priests. Belief that only a faggot priest can turn a piece of bread literally into Christ is literal retardation. Mel ought to just become a Baptist.

    Replies: @Piffle, @Emslander, @Godly533

    The Catholic church is from Satan. Just believe in Christ instead of gay pedo priests. Belief that only a faggot priest can turn a piece of bread literally into Christ is literal retardation. Mel ought to just become a Baptist.

    John 6 and the 3 descriptions of the Last Supper. It’s kind of funny to me how many Protestants are minimizing the power of Christ.

    But great news! Mel’s sedevacantism and his unrepentant very public sins (no, not the Jewish thing) do make him something close to a Baptist.

  • agree with his Sedevacantism completely, because it is simply obvious that the current rulership in the Vatican is not legitimate. Frankly, I don’t even see how any serious person can claim that the Vatican is legitimate at this point given these pseudo “gay marriages†they have ordered the entire Church to perform.

    Because literally the last papal bull said the exact opposite. That blessings to encourage people to God could NOT look like marriage to avoid scandal. I’m okay with you hating the Catholic Church/Pope Francis (like it matters). Just get the facts correct for goodness sake, like a serious person. There’s no “gay marriages” in my neck of the woods, despite Boomer liberal priests practically desperate for it.

  • @SteveK9
    @Rich


    And JFK gave us Vietnam and LBJ
    �
    Not quite fair. Vietnam was barely starting and no one knows what JFK would have done. There are those who think he was going to pull that plug. And, he hardly 'gave us' LBJ, considering Johnson was very likely part of the conspiracy to murder him.

    Replies: @Observator, @Rich, @FTB

    The evidence of JFK’s intention to remove US forces from Vietnam is supported by considerably evidence. Tip O’Neill stated that JFK so informed him at what would be their last meeting in the Oval Office, in the fall of 1963. Senator Wayne Morse, who was a vehement critic of the Vietnam escalation, met JFK on Nov. 11, 1963 and was told that the President agreed with him on the issue. JFK took the Senator outside to the Rose Garden to tell him this because he feared the CIA had bugged the White House, by the way.

    That same day JFK confided his intention to remove all troops to Marine Commander and Joint Chiefs of Staff member General David M. Shoup. JFK had commissioned Shoup to go to Vietnam and report to him on conditions there. The General described a war there simply as “unwinnable.” This had been Kennedy’s assessment of the Vietnam situation when he himself had traveled to Indochina as a young Congressman on a fact-finding mission in 1951. This is just a sampling of the large body of confirming evidence available to diligent researchers.

    Kennedy had to publicly maintain a hard line for the 1964 election campaign, lest his GOP rivals attack him for being “soft on communism.†JFK’s Hyannisport neighbor Larry Newmann recalls Kennedy telling him on his last visit in October, 1963, “The first thing I do when I am re-elected, I am going to get the Americans out of Vietnam”.

  • @Rich
    We've already had a few Irish presidents, including Biden. Clinton, too, his mother was a Cassidy and all his crew did was steal everything that wasn't nailed down, they even stole the 'W's off the computers when Bush was elected. Reagan was another half-Irishman who gave us Martin King Day, Sandra O'Connor and Colin Powell as well as the deficit problems. And JFK gave us Vietnam and LBJ. The Irish haven't done a great job in the Oval Office. They even gave us Obama, whose mother's family came from Co Offaly, and completely destroyed our medical insurance industry.

    Replies: @SteveK9, @T Vat, @Badger Down

    JFK gave us Vietnam

    This is what happens when you call the US war in Vietnam something else. Nobody gave you Vietnam: you can’t have it.

  • @SteveK9
    @Dumbo

    'Stupid theory' !! It makes perfect sense, and was a work of genius, considering the date at which it was proposed. DNA analysis confirms it. There are some environmental effects ... epigenetics, but the basic theory is absolutely solid. Comparing evolution to Freudian theories is a straw-man argument.

    Replies: @Badger Down

    Genius indeed! And Darwin realised that Evolution would blow God out of the water, because He was unnecessary. “Did He who made the lamb make thee?” (Tyger)

  • @Tennessee Jed
    @Wokechoke

    Gibson hates all Brits regardless of religion.

    Replies: @Badger Down

    Gibson is Australian, American, and Scottish or Irish, Celtic let’s say. That’s three reasons to hate the English.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Martin Spencer
    @Badger Down

    Gibson is very clearly a Germanic surname, not a Celtic one.

    The Scots aren't Celts. Scots is a variant of English, not a Celtic language, and wasn't imposed by the English. The historic inhabitants of the Scottish side of the English/Scottish border are genetically indistinguishable from those on the English side. Edinburgh has an English name and used to be in Northumbria. Scotland chose to unite with England at a time when Scotland was essentially a Third World shithole and benefitted hugely from that union. And so on, and so on...

    Gibson is spectacularly ignorant and not terribly bright.
  • Anonymous[167] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:
    @Emslander
    If Mel had been able to stay with the wife who gave him seven or eight kids, I would have more respect for him, but as he is, it only looks like he's trying to justify his backsliding by criticizing the Church that sets the standards he violated.

    Replies: @Dutch Boy, @Anonymous

    The Catholic church is from Satan. Just believe in Christ instead of gay pedo priests. Belief that only a faggot priest can turn a piece of bread literally into Christ is literal retardation. Mel ought to just become a Baptist.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Piffle
    @Anonymous


    The Catholic church is from Satan. Just believe in Christ instead of gay pedo priests. Belief that only a faggot priest can turn a piece of bread literally into Christ is literal retardation. Mel ought to just become a Baptist.
    �
    John 6 and the 3 descriptions of the Last Supper. It's kind of funny to me how many Protestants are minimizing the power of Christ.

    But great news! Mel's sedevacantism and his unrepentant very public sins (no, not the Jewish thing) do make him something close to a Baptist.
    , @Emslander
    @Anonymous

    If you believe such a thing, then you are from Satan. Read the New Testament, Rube.
    , @Godly533
    @Anonymous

    The problem with Protestantism is it turns people into either retards or atheists in denial. You remove all the spirit out of the religious experience and have people congregate in a warehouse somewhere made out of sheet metal listening to soft rock. Satan himself couldn't come up with something so dreary.
  • @Rich
    We've already had a few Irish presidents, including Biden. Clinton, too, his mother was a Cassidy and all his crew did was steal everything that wasn't nailed down, they even stole the 'W's off the computers when Bush was elected. Reagan was another half-Irishman who gave us Martin King Day, Sandra O'Connor and Colin Powell as well as the deficit problems. And JFK gave us Vietnam and LBJ. The Irish haven't done a great job in the Oval Office. They even gave us Obama, whose mother's family came from Co Offaly, and completely destroyed our medical insurance industry.

    Replies: @SteveK9, @T Vat, @Badger Down

    LBJ gave us LBJ. After he killed Kenny

  • @Rich
    We've already had a few Irish presidents, including Biden. Clinton, too, his mother was a Cassidy and all his crew did was steal everything that wasn't nailed down, they even stole the 'W's off the computers when Bush was elected. Reagan was another half-Irishman who gave us Martin King Day, Sandra O'Connor and Colin Powell as well as the deficit problems. And JFK gave us Vietnam and LBJ. The Irish haven't done a great job in the Oval Office. They even gave us Obama, whose mother's family came from Co Offaly, and completely destroyed our medical insurance industry.

    Replies: @SteveK9, @T Vat, @Badger Down

    And JFK gave us Vietnam and LBJ

    Not quite fair. Vietnam was barely starting and no one knows what JFK would have done. There are those who think he was going to pull that plug. And, he hardly ‘gave us’ LBJ, considering Johnson was very likely part of the conspiracy to murder him.

    •ï¿½Agree: FTB
    •ï¿½Replies: @Observator
    @SteveK9

    The evidence of JFK's intention to remove US forces from Vietnam is supported by considerably evidence. Tip O'Neill stated that JFK so informed him at what would be their last meeting in the Oval Office, in the fall of 1963. Senator Wayne Morse, who was a vehement critic of the Vietnam escalation, met JFK on Nov. 11, 1963 and was told that the President agreed with him on the issue. JFK took the Senator outside to the Rose Garden to tell him this because he feared the CIA had bugged the White House, by the way.

    That same day JFK confided his intention to remove all troops to Marine Commander and Joint Chiefs of Staff member General David M. Shoup. JFK had commissioned Shoup to go to Vietnam and report to him on conditions there. The General described a war there simply as "unwinnable." This had been Kennedy's assessment of the Vietnam situation when he himself had traveled to Indochina as a young Congressman on a fact-finding mission in 1951. This is just a sampling of the large body of confirming evidence available to diligent researchers.

    Kennedy had to publicly maintain a hard line for the 1964 election campaign, lest his GOP rivals attack him for being “soft on communism.†JFK's Hyannisport neighbor Larry Newmann recalls Kennedy telling him on his last visit in October, 1963, "The first thing I do when I am re-elected, I am going to get the Americans out of Vietnam".
    , @Rich
    @SteveK9

    JFK went from 800 troops when he took office to over 16k by the time he was killed. Whether he was planning on removing them, he never did and we'll never know if he ever would have. We do know he increased the amount by 20x. Big numbers.
    , @FTB
    @SteveK9

    Our involvement began much earlier during our Secret War in Laos that was waged against North Vietnamese supply lines as early as 1963.

    My father was a helicopter door gunner. That was the beginning of using choppers as a gunship platform. He never admitted to being in ground combat but he told me what an M14 Main Battle Rifle could do to a human target. This was before the M14s was phased out in favor of the M16s.

    As for JFK, he wanted to have a detente with the USSR, and eventually, Communist China because he figured that despite deploring their forms of government, war between nuclear powers would be insane.

    Contrast that with today's unhinged, satanic pedophiles in D.C. who are picking a fight with Russia and China; the world's largest and third largest nuclear powers.

    Replies: @Piglet
  • @Dumbo
    @Renard

    You don't need to be a "fundamentalist Christian" or to follow any kind of religion to disprove Darwin's theory of "evolution of species by natural (sexual) selection of random mutations". It's a stupid theory. In the future it will be seen as something almost as dated as Freud's dumb theories.

    The Torah refers to some books of the "Old Testament" but not all. In any case the important Jewish texts are in the Talmud, not the Torah. Their laws are in the Talmud.

    Replies: @SteveK9, @ANON

    ‘Stupid theory’ !! It makes perfect sense, and was a work of genius, considering the date at which it was proposed. DNA analysis confirms it. There are some environmental effects … epigenetics, but the basic theory is absolutely solid. Comparing evolution to Freudian theories is a straw-man argument.

    •ï¿½Agree: Badger Down, Mike Conrad
    •ï¿½Replies: @Badger Down
    @SteveK9

    Genius indeed! And Darwin realised that Evolution would blow God out of the water, because He was unnecessary. "Did He who made the lamb make thee?" (Tyger)
  • @Dumbo

    One thing I have complained about before regarding Mel is that since being blacklisted by Jews, he does these B movies which are not great.
    �
    Did he make anything good since Apocalypto? It doesn't seem so. Of course, making that type of historical movies, which seems to be Mel's strength, costs lots of money.

    I would watch the interview out of curiosity but I can't stand Rogan, or his ads.

    Replies: @Jefferson Temple, @Anonymous, @SteveK9, @Richard B

    ‘Get the Gringo’ is really fun, although the end dragged and didn’t make sense. But, most of the film is classic Gibson.

  • Anonymous[120] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:
    @Jefferson Temple
    @Wokechoke

    No, it was Gibson.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Wokechoke

    He was undoubtedly confusing it with the Eastwood movie Heartbreak Ridge, which involved a story about a Medal of Honor recipient from the Korean War.

    •ï¿½Agree: Jefferson Temple
  • MEL GIBSON GOT CAUGHT UP IN THE HOLLYWOOD HELLFIRE

    Stagefright by The Band — lyrics by Robbie Robertson:

    Now Deep In The Heart Of A Lonely Kid
    Who Suffered So Much For What He Did
    They Gave This Ploughboy His Fortune And Fame
    Since That Day He Ain’t Been The Same.

    See The Man With The Stage Fright
    Just Standin’ Up There To Give It All His Might.
    And He Got Caught In The Spotlight
    But When We Get To The End
    He Wants To Start All Over Again.

    I’ve Got Fire Water Right On My Breath
    And The Doctor Warned Me I Might Catch A Death.
    Said, You Can Make It In Your Disguise,
    Just Never Show The Fear That’s In Your Eyes.

    Stagefright — The Last Waltz — The Band:


    Video Link

  • @Wokechoke
    @Johnny LeBlanc

    God is an Englishman, much like Edward Longshanks, a king that Mel defamed in his Braveheart.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmm4o06UfZQ

    Here’s the guy who banished the Jews from England.


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q2IQdqHy2dc

    Replies: @Tennessee Jed, @Dutch Boy

    Unfortunately, Ed’s main military activities were against the Scots, not the Saracens.

    •ï¿½Replies: @FTB
    @Dutch Boy

    Actually, a lot of the Crusades were waged against the Orthodox Church.

    Replies: @Piffle
  • @Emslander
    If Mel had been able to stay with the wife who gave him seven or eight kids, I would have more respect for him, but as he is, it only looks like he's trying to justify his backsliding by criticizing the Church that sets the standards he violated.

    Replies: @Dutch Boy, @Anonymous

    It has been reported that he suffers from bipolar depression, which, if true, explains a lot of his behavior. Sexual promiscuity during the manic phase is common, as is drug abuse.That said, breaking up one’s family by adultery is deplorable and a black mark against any man who does so.

  • @c matt
    @Jefferson Temple

    They were dying for what they believed to be the truth. In other words, if those track suit wearers knew or thought JJ was lying (or if they were just playing along to get laid) they would not have drunk the koolaide.

    So yes, people may die for lie, but not if they know it to be a lie. Would you die for the lie that israel is our greatest ally, and any attack on them is an attack on us? No, unless you are a MAGAtard. But if you are a MAGAtard, you actually believe the lie.

    I understood Mel's comment to be that the Apostles really saw what they said they saw, because if they had just made it up they would not accept torture and death for such a lie.

    Replies: @Jefferson Temple

    You get my point. Am I suggesting that the twelve could’ve been just as misled as the Heaven’s Gate victims? Yes, I am. Am I saying that I know it for sure? Of course not. That would be ridiculous. Two thousand years have passed. I couldn’t possibly know for sure. But the truth remains; people die in service of lies that they believe and it’s not infrequent.

  • @Wokechoke
    @Anonymous

    Wasn’t that Clint Eastwood?

    Replies: @Jefferson Temple

    No, it was Gibson.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Anonymous
    @Jefferson Temple

    He was undoubtedly confusing it with the Eastwood movie Heartbreak Ridge, which involved a story about a Medal of Honor recipient from the Korean War.
    , @Wokechoke
    @Jefferson Temple

    Correct.
  • Phibbs says:

    ” The Theory of Evolution is a lie.” I don’t think so. The huge differences between Negros, Asians and whites took at least 100,000 years to develop. Neanderthals were in Europe 200,000 years before modern people arrived. Evidence of ancient, pre-human civilizations abound. The most reasonable belief is that God — or maybe aliens — guided the evolution of man from monkeys to homo sapiens. But what kind of god is it that created Negros, who are ugly, stupid and have no self-discipline? I’ll tell you what kind of god did that: a sadistic one. Anyone who worships the Jewish god or the Christian god is worshiping an arbitrary and aloof god.
    On a final note, almost all the Born-Again Christians I know are cheering on the genocide of the Palestinians by the Jews. This is because Born-Again Christians worship Israel and the Jews. Obviously, the god of the Jews and evangelicals is a very nefarious god indeed!

    •ï¿½Agree: xcd
    •ï¿½Replies: @Johnny LeBlanc
    @Phibbs

    White, purple-haired, child-molesting woketards and self-loathing born-again White Christian Jew lickspittles are two sides of the same coin. Both worship destructive deities, both engage in self-destructive virtue signaling, both love two-legged turds from the far corners of the Earth more than their own race, both are manipulated by Jews into self-destruction.
  • @Wokechoke
    @Johnny LeBlanc

    God is an Englishman, much like Edward Longshanks, a king that Mel defamed in his Braveheart.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmm4o06UfZQ

    Here’s the guy who banished the Jews from England.


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q2IQdqHy2dc

    Replies: @Tennessee Jed, @Dutch Boy

    Gibson hates all Brits regardless of religion.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Badger Down
    @Tennessee Jed

    Gibson is Australian, American, and Scottish or Irish, Celtic let's say. That's three reasons to hate the English.

    Replies: @Martin Spencer
  • Hollywood Jews Hate White Christians.

    Hollywood Jews Hate Mel Gibson — Except When The Hollywood Jews Were Making Plenty Of Skekels From Melvin’s Popcorn Muncher Movies.

    Hollywood Jews Hate White Core Americans.

    Hollywood Jews Hate The British Protestant/European Christian Ancestral Core Of The USA.

    The Harvey Weinstein type Jews and their fellow Jew rats in Hollywood do not want to do what Mel Gibson set out to do in the movie Braveheart. Mel Gibson wanted to make an inspiring movie that shows White heroics on a grand scale. Gibson had a smash hit that was fun to watch, and it was uplifting.

    The Harvey Weinstein Jew crowd in Hollywood told Mel Gibson to take a hike when Gibson was pitching “The Passion of the Christ.†Mel Gibson made hundreds of millions of dollars on that movie. Harvey Weinstein and his fellow Jew rats in Hollywood did not want to make a movie that celebrated the sacrifice of Jesus Christ as a transcendent, timeless event that changed the world.

    Sam Francis spoke of the therapeutic managerial state in terms of its attack on traditional American culture and values. Hollywood rodents such as Kevin Spacey and Harvey Weinstein are longtime members of the entertainment faction of the therapeutic managerial state. Hollywood has been selling the American people a fake America in order to allow shyster bankers to steal the real one.

    Hollywood’s role has been to install a sense of future futility into the White Core American heart of the United States. Hollywood has attempted to mold the mass mind towards cowardice and weakness. Hollywood attacks heroicism. Hollywood is anti-White and Hollywood is anti-Christian. Mel Gibson is an example of a Hollywood figure who tries to bring heroic movies to the screen.

    Hollywood has been pathologizing the natural cultural expression of the European Christian ancestral core of the United States. Scumbag rats such as Kevin Spacey and Harvey Weinstein are just hiding their disgusting behaviour by claiming they are undergoing “therapy†to answer for their criminal deeds.

    The call for “therapy†or the use of “therapy†as a shield to deflect wrongdoing has run rampant in the political and cultural atmosphere created by the JEW/WASP Managerial Ruling Class of the American Empire.

    The Evil JEW/WASP Ruling Class of the American Empire Must Be Politically Decapitated

  • @Anonymous
    @Dumbo


    Did he make anything good since Apocalypto?
    �
    Hacksaw Ridge in 2016 was awesome. It was about Medal of Honor recipient Desmond Doss in WWII who was a religious conscientious objector and medic during the U.S. Army’s arguably most intense battle ever (The Battle of Okinawa). Doss never picked up or used a gun in war but went into the most hellacious fighting to drag badly-wounded soldiers to safety.

    https://www.eatlife.net/wwii/images/desmond-doss-card.jpg

    �

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    Wasn’t that Clint Eastwood?

    •ï¿½Thanks: Tennessee Jed
    •ï¿½Replies: @Jefferson Temple
    @Wokechoke

    No, it was Gibson.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Wokechoke
  • @anarchore
    It was disappointing. He even had to virtue signal Hitler and Stalin being bad, and that he won't be in the same cell in hell as Hitler... that's true because as a liar, you should be in a worse place than a man who always told the truth.

    Mel covers for the jewish crimes by condemning Hitler when there was no call for it, he brought it up himself. He thinks he is better than Hitler.

    Of course maybe he isn't a traitor, for as a muddle headed irrational afficianado of a dark ages splinter of the jewish death cult called Christianity, perhaps he is doing right by his sky-demon and will be rewarded in the afterlife for serving the ideological goals of the most evil people on earth.

    Somehow I don't think so, even in the unlikely event there is a deity. Couldn't even keep lies about Hitler out of his mouth for two hours. What a boomer POS.

    Replies: @c matt, @ThreeCranes

    Agree. Once you accept the proposition that God in becoming incarnate chose a Jew as his boy, you’ve pretty much bought into the whole notion of Jews being this incredible, special people, God’s chosen. Once you’ve granted them this power over you, you are to all intents and purposes, a slave. Lame.

    A Christian forsakes his Greco-Roman heritage and his Germanic as well, offering them up for sacrifice on the Abrahamic altar.

    “Here, take my first-born son (our pre-Christian, pagan celebrations of our own people) and I’ll console myself instead with your castoff, tortured, God-man-boy-son whose own Fathers ostracized him. Such a good deal! Thanks! I’m (literally) eternally grateful.”

    •ï¿½Replies: @Piffle
    @ThreeCranes


    Once you accept the proposition that God in becoming incarnate chose a Jew as his boy, you’ve pretty much bought into the whole notion of Jews being this incredible, special people, God’s chosen. Once you’ve granted them this power over you, you are to all intents and purposes, a slave. Lame.
    �
    Jesus didn't Incarnate as a Jew. He's fully man, which suggests that physically He's the New Adam. Also, knowing that it was the Israelites not the Judahites (Jews) that were the chosen people. Also knowing that the Israelite nation was gone physically from the planet by about 70AD. There's no Levitical priesthood, no other tribe around except supposed "Jews". Jesus predicted the destruction and the destruction was final.

    In other words, knowing actual Christian theology and the OT rather than the "Everyone in the OT/NT was a Jew, yes" is a huge help.
    , @Wokechoke
    @ThreeCranes

    I disagree. Christianity looks very much like a way to Troll the Jews. A way to troll their conception of salvation and a Saviour.

    The idea of incarnating The God into human flesh is a huge insulting swipe at the Jews.
  • @anarchore
    It was disappointing. He even had to virtue signal Hitler and Stalin being bad, and that he won't be in the same cell in hell as Hitler... that's true because as a liar, you should be in a worse place than a man who always told the truth.

    Mel covers for the jewish crimes by condemning Hitler when there was no call for it, he brought it up himself. He thinks he is better than Hitler.

    Of course maybe he isn't a traitor, for as a muddle headed irrational afficianado of a dark ages splinter of the jewish death cult called Christianity, perhaps he is doing right by his sky-demon and will be rewarded in the afterlife for serving the ideological goals of the most evil people on earth.

    Somehow I don't think so, even in the unlikely event there is a deity. Couldn't even keep lies about Hitler out of his mouth for two hours. What a boomer POS.

    Replies: @c matt, @ThreeCranes

    Stalin was bad.

  • Disclaimer: I have not had time to watch the two hour, 20 minute video of the Joe Rogan interview, so I might take a different line if I had.

    Mel Gibson is a one-of-a-kind loose cannon and that makes him useful. He’s half crazy, but so is almost everyone in the movie industry, and the form his craziness takes is far from the wokeness-spouting norm. He violates taboos and says things no one with a care for self-preservation would dare to. And he literally puts his money where his mouth is, having himself bankrolled The Passion of the Christ when the Hollywood establishment wouldn’t touch it with boxing gloves.

    He’s a good actor when he wants to be and the role is right for him. (See, for instance, Ransom and Payback.) I agree with Andrew that, especially in the past decade, he’s lent himself to some pretty lame stuff, such as (in my view) Get the Gringo, Dragged Across Concrete and Force of Nature. Probably such films are just potboilers to supply him with the cash he needs to make movies he cares about.

    I used to think Sam Peckinpah was the last ornery, don’t-give-a-fuck individualist “auteur” in big-budget film making, and we’d never see another. But in his own way Mel has stepped into Peckinpah’s shoes and fills them admirably.

    •ï¿½Agree: inspector general