');
The Unz Review •ï¿½An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library •ï¿½B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


�Remember My InformationWhy?
�Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Alastair Crooke Anatoly Karlin Andrew Anglin Andrew Joyce Audacious Epigone Boyd D. Cathey C.J. Hopkins E. Michael Jones Eric Margolis Eric Striker Fred Reed Gilad Atzmon Godfree Roberts Gregory Hood Guillaume Durocher Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir James Kirkpatrick James Thompson Jared Taylor John Derbyshire Jonathan Cook Jung-Freud Karlin Community Kevin Barrett Kevin MacDonald Lance Welton Larry Romanoff Laurent Guyénot Linh Dinh Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Kersey Pepe Escobar Peter Frost Philip Giraldi Razib Khan Ron Unz Steve Sailer The Saker Tobias Langdon Trevor Lynch A. Graham A. J. Smuskiewicz A Southerner Academic Research Group UK Staff Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Agha Hussain Ahmad Al Khaled Ahmet Öncü Alain De Benoist Alan Macleod Albemarle Man Alex Graham Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alexander Jacob Alexander Wolfheze Alfred McCoy Alison Weir Allan Wall Allegra Harpootlian Amalric De Droevig Ambrose Kane Amr Abozeid Anand Gopal Anastasia Katz Andre Damon Andre Vltchek Andreas Canetti Andrei Martyanov Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andrew Hamilton Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Napolitano Andrew S. Fischer Andy Kroll Angie Saxon Ann Jones Anna Tolstoyevskaya Anne Wilson Smith Anonymous Anonymous American Anonymous Attorney Anonymous Occidental Anthony Boehm Anthony Bryan Anthony DiMaggio Tony Hall Antiwar Staff Antonius Aquinas Antony C. Black Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor AudaciousEpigone Augustin Goland Austen Layard Ava Muhammad Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Kissin Barry Lando Barton Cockey Beau Albrecht Belle Chesler Ben Fountain Ben Freeman Ben Sullivan Benjamin Villaroel Bernard M. Smith Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Blake Archer Williams Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Book Brad Griffin Bradley Moore Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brett Wilkins Brian Dew Brian McGlinchey Brian R. Wright Brittany Smith C.D. Corax Cara Marianna Carl Boggs Carl Horowitz Carolyn Yeager Cat McGuire Catherine Crump César Keller Chalmers Johnson Chanda Chisala Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlie O'Neill Charlottesville Survivor Chase Madar Chauke Stephan Filho Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Chris Woltermann Christian Appy Christophe Dolbeau Christopher DeGroot Christopher Donovan Christopher Ketcham Chuck Spinney Civus Non Nequissimus CODOH Editors Coleen Rowley Colin Liddell Cooper Sterling Craig Murray Cynthia Chung D.F. Mulder Dahr Jamail Dakota Witness Dan E. Phillips Dan Sanchez Daniel Barge Daniel McAdams Daniel Moscardi Daniel Vinyard Danny Sjursen Dave Chambers Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Boyajian David Bromwich David Chibo David Chu David Gordon David Haggith David Irving David L. McNaron David Lorimer David Martin David North David Stockman David Vine David Walsh David William Pear David Yorkshire Dean Baker Declan Hayes Dennis Dale Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Diego Ramos Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Dmitriy Kalyagin Donald Thoresen Alan Sabrosky Dr. Ejaz Akram Dr. Ridgely Abdul Mu’min Muhammad Dries Van Langenhove Eamonn Fingleton Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Edward Curtin Edward Dutton Egbert Dijkstra Egor Kholmogorov Ehud Shapiro Ekaterina Blinova Ellen Brown Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Emil Kirkegaard Emilio García Gómez Emma Goldman Enzo Porter Eric Draitser Eric Paulson Eric Peters Eric Rasmusen Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Gant Eugene Girin Eugene Kusmiak Eve Mykytyn F. Roger Devlin Fadi Abu Shammalah Fantine Gardinier Federale Fenster Fergus Hodgson Finian Cunningham The First Millennium Revisionist Fordham T. Smith Former Agent Forum Francis Goumain Frank Tipler Franklin Lamb Franklin Stahl Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Gary Corseri Gary Heavin Gary North Gary Younge Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Galloway George Koo George Mackenzie George Szamuely Georgianne Nienaber Gilbert Cavanaugh Gilbert Doctorow Giles Corey Glen K. Allen Glenn Greenwald A. Beaujean Agnostic Alex B. Amnestic Arcane Asher Bb Bbartlog Ben G Birch Barlow Canton ChairmanK Chrisg Coffee Mug Darth Quixote David David B David Boxenhorn DavidB Diana Dkane DMI Dobeln Duende Dylan Ericlien Fly Gcochran Godless Grady Herrick Jake & Kara Jason Collins Jason Malloy Jason�s Jeet Jemima Joel John Emerson John Quiggin JP Kele Kjmtchl Mark Martin Matoko Kusanagi Matt Matt McIntosh Michael Vassar Miko Ml Ole P-ter Piccolino Rosko Schizmatic Scorpius Suman TangoMan The Theresa Thorfinn Thrasymachus Wintz Gonzalo Lira Graham Seibert Grant M. Dahl Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Greg Klein Gregg Stanley Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Conte Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Gunnar Alfredsson Gustavo Arellano Hank Johnson Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Hans Vogel Harri Honkanen Heiner Rindermann Henry Cockburn Hewitt E. Moore Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Howe Abbot-Hiss Hua Bin Hubert Collins Hugh Kennedy Hugh McInnish Hugh Moriarty Hugo Dionísio Hunter DeRensis Hunter Wallace Huntley Haverstock Ian Fantom Igor Shafarevich Ira Chernus Ivan Kesić J. Alfred Powell J.B. Clark J.D. Gore J. Ricardo Martins Jacek Szela Jack Antonio Jack Dalton Jack Kerwick Jack Krak Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen Jake Bowyer James Bovard James Carroll James Carson Harrington James Chang James Dunphy James Durso James Edwards James Fulford James Gillespie James Hanna James J. O'Meara James K. Galbraith James Karlsson James Lawrence James Petras Jane Lazarre Jane Weir Janice Kortkamp Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Cannon Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jayant Bhandari JayMan Jean Bricmont Jean Marois Jean Ranc Jef Costello Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey D. Sachs Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jesse Mossman JHR Writers Jim Daniel Jim Fetzer Jim Goad Jim Kavanagh Jim Smith JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Dackman Joe Lauria Joel S. Hirschhorn Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Harrison Sims John Helmer John Hill John Huss John J. Mearsheimer John Jackson John Kiriakou John Macdonald John Morgan John Patterson John Leonard John Pilger John Q. Publius John Rand John Reid John Ryan John Scales Avery John Siman John Stauber John T. Kelly John Taylor John Titus John Tremain John V. Walsh John Wear John Williams Jon Else Jon Entine Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Revusky Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Sawyer Jonathan Schell Jordan Henderson Jordan Steiner Jose Alberto Nino Joseph Kay Joseph Kishore Joseph Sobran Josephus Tiberius Josh Neal Jeshurun Tsarfat Juan Cole Judith Coburn Julian Bradford Julian Macfarlane K.J. Noh Kacey Gunther Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Karl Haemers Karl Nemmersdorf Karl Thorburn Kees Van Der Pijl Keith Woods Kelley Vlahos Kenn Gividen Kenneth Vinther Kerry Bolton Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin Michael Grace Kevin Rothrock Kevin Sullivan Kevin Zeese Kshama Sawant Larry C. Johnson Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Lawrence Erickson Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Leonard C. Goodman Leonard R. Jaffee Liam Cosgrove Lidia Misnik Lilith Powell Linda Preston Lipton Matthews Liv Heide Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett Louis Farrakhan Lydia Brimelow M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maciej Pieczyński Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marco De Wit Marcus Alethia Marcus Apostate Marcus Cicero Marcus Devonshire Margaret Flowers Margot Metroland Marian Evans Mark Allen Mark Bratchikov-Pogrebisskiy Mark Crispin Miller Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Gullick Mark H. Gaffney Mark Lu Mark Perry Mark Weber Marshall Yeats Martin Jay Martin K. O'Toole Martin Webster Martin Witkerk Mary Phagan-Kean Matt Cockerill Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Caldwell Matthew Ehret Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max Jones Max North Max Parry Max West Maya Schenwar Merlin Miller Metallicman Michael A. Roberts Michael Averko Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Hoffman Michael Masterson Michael Quinn Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Michelle Malkin Miko Peled Mnar Muhawesh Moon Landing Skeptic Morgan Jones Morris V. De Camp Mr. Anti-Humbug Muhammed Abu Murray Polner N. Joseph Potts Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Nathan Cofnas Nathan Doyle Ned Stark Neil Kumar Nelson Rosit Niall McCrae Nicholas R. Jeelvy Nicholas Stix Nick Griffin Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Nicolás Palacios Navarro Nils Van Der Vegte Noam Chomsky NOI Research Group Nomi Prins Norman Finkelstein Norman Solomon OldMicrobiologist Oliver Boyd-Barrett Oliver Williams Oscar Grau P.J. Collins Pádraic O'Bannon Patrice Greanville Patrick Armstrong Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Patrick Lawrence Patrick Martin Patrick McDermott Patrick Whittle Paul Bennett Paul Cochrane Paul De Rooij Paul Edwards Paul Engler Paul Gottfried Paul Larudee Paul Mitchell Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Paul Souvestre Paul Tripp Pedro De Alvarado Peter Baggins Ph.D. Peter Bradley Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Lee Peter Van Buren Philip Kraske Philip Weiss Pierre M. Sprey Pierre Simon Povl H. Riis-Knudsen Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Qasem Soleimani Rachel Marsden Raches Radhika Desai Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ralph Raico Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Ramzy Baroud Randy Shields Raul Diego Ray McGovern Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Reginald De Chantillon Rémi Tremblay Rev. Matthew Littlefield Ricardo Duchesne Richard Cook Richard Falk Richard Foley Richard Galustian Richard Houck Richard Hugus Richard Knight Richard Krushnic Richard McCulloch Richard Silverstein Richard Solomon Rick Shenkman Rick Sterling Rita Rozhkova Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Debrus Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Fisk Robert Hampton Robert Henderson Robert Inlakesh Robert LaFlamme Robert Lindsay Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Stark Robert Stevens Robert Trivers Robert Wallace Robert Weissberg Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Rolo Slavskiy Romana Rubeo Romanized Visigoth Ron Paul Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning RT Staff Ruuben Kaalep Ryan Andrews Ryan Dawson Sabri Öncü Salim Mansur Sam Dickson Sam Francis Sam Husseini Sayed Hasan Scot Olmstead Scott Howard Scott Locklin Scott Ritter Servando Gonzalez Sharmine Narwani Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Sidney James Sietze Bosman Sigurd Kristensen Sinclair Jenkins Southfront Editor Spencer Davenport Spencer J. Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen F. Cohen Stephen J. Rossi Stephen J. Sniegoski Stephen Paul Foster Sterling Anderson Steve Fraser Steve Keen Steve Penfield Steven Farron Steven Yates Subhankar Banerjee Susan Southard Sydney Schanberg Talia Mullin Tanya Golash-Boza Taxi Taylor McClain Taylor Young Ted O'Keefe Ted Rall The Crew The Zman Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas A. Fudge Thomas Anderson Thomas Hales Thomas Dalton Thomas Ertl Thomas Frank Thomas Hales Thomas Jackson Thomas O. Meehan Thomas Steuben Thomas Zaja Thorsten J. Pattberg Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Timothy Vorgenss Timur Fomenko Tingba Muhammad Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Engelhardt Tom Mysiewicz Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Torin Murphy Tracy Rosenberg Travis LeBlanc Vernon Thorpe Virginia Dare Vito Klein Vladimir Brovkin Vladimir Putin Vladislav Krasnov Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walt King Walter E. Block Warren Balogh Washington Watcher Washington Watcher II Wayne Allensworth Wei Ling Chua Wesley Muhammad White Man Faculty Whitney Webb Wilhelm Kriessmann Wilhem Ivorsson Will Jones Will Offensicht William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Wyatt Peterson Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen Yaroslav Podvolotskiy Yvonne Lorenzo Zhores Medvedev
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2020 Election Academia American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Benjamin Netanyahu Black Crime Black Lives Matter Blacks Britain Censorship China China/America Conspiracy Theories Covid Culture/Society Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy Gaza Hamas History Holocaust Ideology Immigration IQ Iran Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Joe Biden NATO Nazi Germany Neocons Open Thread Political Correctness Race/Ethnicity Russia Science Syria Ukraine Vladimir Putin World War II 汪精衛 100% Jussie-free Content 1984 2008 Election 2012 Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2022 Election 2024 Election 23andMe 9/11 9/11 Commission Report Abortion Abraham Lincoln Abu Mehdi Muhandas Achievement Gap ACLU Acting White Adam Schiff Addiction ADL Admin Administration Admixture Adolf Hitler Advertising AfD Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Age Age Of Malthusian Industrialism Agriculture AI AIPAC Air Force Aircraft Carriers Airlines Airports Al Jazeera Al Qaeda Al-Shifa Alain Soral Alan Clemmons Alan Dershowitz Albania Albert Einstein Albion's Seed Alcoholism Alejandro Mayorkas Alex Jones Alexander Dugin Alexander Vindman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Alexei Navalny Algeria Ali Dawabsheh Alien And Sedition Acts Alison Nathan Alt Right Altruism Amazon Amazon.com America America First American Civil War American Dream American History American Indians American Israel Public Affairs Committee American Jews American Left American Nations American Presidents American Prisons American Renaissance Amerindians Amish Amnesty Amnesty International Amos Hochstein Amy Klobuchar Amygdala Anarchism Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Greece Ancient Rome Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Bacevich Andrew Sullivan Andrew Yang Anglo-America Anglo-imperialism Anglo-Saxons Anglos Anglosphere Angola Animal IQ Animal Rights Wackos Animals Ann Coulter Anne Frank Anthony Blinken Anthony Fauci Anthrax Anthropology Anti-Defamation League Anti-Gentilism Anti-Semites Anti-Vaccination Anti-Vaxx Anti-white Animus Antifa Antifeminism Antiracism Antisemitism Antisemitism Awareness Act Antisocial Behavior Antizionism Antony Blinken Apartheid Apartheid Israel Apollo's Ascent Appalachia Apple Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaeogenetics Archaeology Archaic DNA Architecture Arctic Arctic Sea Ice Melting Argentina Ariel Sharon Armageddon War Armenia Armenian Genocide Army Arnold Schwarzenegger Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Jensen Arthur Lichte Artificial Intelligence Arts/Letters Aryan Invasion Theory Aryans Aryeh Lightstone Ash Carter Ashkenazi Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians Assassination Assassinations Assimilation Atheism Atlanta AUMF Auschwitz Australia Australian Aboriginals Autism Automation Avril Haines Ayn Rand Azerbaijan Azov Brigade Babes And Hunks Baby Gap Balfour Declaration Balkans Balochistan Baltics Baltimore Riots Banjamin Netanyahu Banking Industry Banking System Banks #BanTheADL Barack Obama Baseball Statistics Bashar Al-Assad Basketball #BasketOfDeplorables BBC BDS BDS Movement Beauty Beethoven Behavior Genetics Behavioral Genetics Bela Belarus Belgium Belgrade Embassy Bombing Ben Cardin Ben Hodges Ben Rhodes Ben Shapiro Ben Stiller Benny Gantz Bernard Henri-Levy Bernie Sanders Betsy DeVos Betty McCollum Bezalel Smotrich Bezalel Yoel Smotrich Biden BigPost Bilateral Relations Bilingual Education Bill Clinton Bill De Blasio Bill Gates Bill Kristol Bill Maher Bill Of Rights Billionaires Billy Graham Bioethics Biology Bioweapons Birmingham Birth Rate Bitcoin Black Community Black History Month Black Muslims Black Panthers Black People Black Slavery BlackLivesMatter BlackRock Blake Masters Blank Slatism BLM Blog Blogging Blogosphere Blond Hair Blood Libel Blue Eyes Boasian Anthropology Boeing Boers Bolshevik Revolution Bolshevik Russia Books Boomers Border Wall Boris Johnson Bosnia Boycott Divest And Sanction Brain Drain Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Bret Stephens Brett McGurk Bretton Woods Brexit Brezhnev Bri Brian Mast BRICs Brighter Brains British Empire British Labour Party British Politics Buddhism Build The Wall Bulldog Bush Business Byzantine Caitlin Johnstone California Californication Camp Of The Saints Canada Cancer Candace Owens Capitalism Carl Von Clausewitz Carlos Slim Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Cars Carthaginians Catalonia Catholic Church Catholicism Catholics Cats Caucasus CDC Ceasefire Cecil Rhodes Census Central Asia Central Intelligence Agency Chanda Chisala Chaos And Order Charles De Gaulle Charles Manson Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charlie Hebdo Charlottesville Checheniest Chechen Of Them All Chechens Chechnya Chernobyl Chetty Chicago Chicagoization Chicken Hut Child Abuse Children Chile China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese IQ Chinese Language Christian Zionists Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Christopher Wray Chuck Schumer CIA Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil Rights Movement Civil War Civilization Clannishness Clash Of Civilizations Class Classical Antiquity Classical History Classical Music Clayton County Climate Climate Change Clint Eastwood Clintons Coal Coalition Of The Fringes Cognitive Elitism Cognitive Science Cold Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Powell Colin Woodard College Admission College Football Colonialism Color Revolution Columbia University Columbus Comic Books Communism Computers Confederacy Confederate Flag Congress Conquistador-American Conservatism Conservative Movement Conservatives Conspiracy Theory Constantinople Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumerism Controversial Book Convergence Core Article Corona Corporatism Corruption COTW Counterpunch Country Music Cousin Marriage Cover Story COVID-19 Craig Murray Creationism Crime Crimea Crispr Critical Race Theory Cruise Missiles Crusades Crying Among The Farmland Cryptocurrency Ctrl-Left Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckery Cuckservatism Cuckservative CUFI Cuisine Cultural Marxism Cultural Revolution Culture Culture War Curfew Czars Czech Republic DACA Daily Data Dump Dallas Shooting Damnatio Memoriae Dan Bilzarian Danny Danon Daren Acemoglu Darwinism Darya Dugina Data Data Analysis Dave Chappelle David Bazelon David Brog David Friedman David Frum David Irving David Lynch David Petraeus Davide Piffer Davos Death Of The West Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Deborah Lipstadt Debt Debt Jubilee Decadence Deep State Deficits Degeneracy Democracy Democratic Party Demograhics Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denmark Dennis Ross Department Of Homeland Security Deplatforming Derek Chauvin Detroit Development Dick Cheney Diet Digital Yuan Dinesh D'Souza Discrimination Disease Disinformation Disney Disparate Impact Dissent Dissidence Diversity Diversity Before Diversity Diversity Pokemon Points Divorce DNA Dogs Dollar Domestic Surveillance Domestic Terrorism Doomsday Clock Dostoevsky Doug Emhoff Doug Feith Dresden Drone War Drones Drug Laws Drugs Duterte Dysgenic Dystopia E. Michael Jones E. O. Wilson East Asia East Asian Exception East Asians East Turkestan Eastern Europe Ebrahim Raisi Economic Development Economic History Economic Sanctions Economy Ecuador Edmund Burke Edmund Burke Foundation Education Edward Snowden Effective Altruism Effortpost Efraim Zurofff Egor Kholmogorov Egypt Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2020 Election Fraud Elections Electric Cars Eli Rosenbaum Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elise Stefanik Elites Elizabeth Holmes Elizabeth Warren Elliot Abrams Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emmanuel Macron Emmett Till Employment Energy England Entertainment Environment Environmentalism Epidemiology Equality Erdogan Eretz Israel Eric Zemmour Ernest Hemingway Espionage Espionage Act Estonia Ethics Ethics And Morals Ethiopia Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity Ethnocentricty EU Eugene Debs Eugenics Eurabia Eurasia Euro Europe European Genetics European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Genetics Evolutionary Psychology Existential Risks Eye Color Face Shape Facebook Faces Fake News False Flag Attack Family Family Systems Fantasy FARA Farmers Fascism Fast Food FBI FDA FDD Federal Reserve Feminism Ferguson Ferguson Shooting Fermi Paradox Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates FIFA Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Finland Finn Baiting Finns First Amendment FISA Fitness Flash Mobs Flight From White Floyd Riots 2020 Fluctuarius Argenteus Flynn Effect Food Football For Fun Forecasts Foreign Agents Registration Act Foreign Policy Fourth Amendment Fox News France Francesca Albanese Frank Salter Frankfurt School Franklin D. Roosevelt Franz Boas Fraud Freakonomics Fred Kagan Free Market Free Speech Free Trade Freedom Of Speech Freedom French Revolution Friedrich Karl Berger Friends Of The Israel Defense Forces Frivolty Frontlash Furkan Dogan Future Futurism G20 Gambling Game Game Of Thrones Gavin McInnes Gavin Newsom Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians GDP Gen Z Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Equality Gender Reassignment Gene-Culture Coevolution Genealogy General Intelligence General Motors Generation Z Generational Gap Genes Genetic Diversity Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Genghis Khan Genocide Genocide Convention Genomics Gentrification Geography Geopolitics George Floyd George Galloway George Patton George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush Georgia Germans Germany Ghislaine Maxwell Gilad Atzmon Gina Peddy Giorgia Meloni Gladwell Glenn Greenwald Global Warming Globalism Globalization Globo-Homo God Gold Golf Gonzalo Lira Google Government Government Debt Government Overreach Government Spending Government Surveillance Government Waste Goyim Grant Smith Graphs Great Bifurcation Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Powers Great Replacement #GreatWhiteDefendantPrivilege Greece Greeks Greenland Greg Cochran Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Greta Thunberg Grooming Group Intelligence Group Selection GSS Guardian Guest Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns Guy Swan GWAS Gypsies H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Haiti Hajnal Line Halloween HammerHate Hannibal Procedure Happening Happiness Harvard Harvard University Harvey Weinstein Hassan Nasrallah Hate Crimes Fraud Hoax Hate Hoaxes Hate Speech Hbd Hbd Chick Health Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Hegira Height Henry Harpending Henry Kissinger Hereditary Heredity Heritability Hezbollah High Speed Rail Hillary Clinton Hindu Caste System Hindus Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanics Historical Genetics History Of Science Hitler HIV/AIDS Hoax Holland Hollywood Holocaust Denial Holocaust Deniers Holy Roman Empire Homelessness Homicide Homicide Rate Homomania Homosexuality Hong Kong Houellebecq Housing Houthis Howard Kohr Huawei Hubbert's Peak Huddled Masses Huey Newton Hug Thug Human Achievement Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Evolutionary Genetics Human Evolutionary Genomics Human Genetics Human Genomics Human Rights Human Rights Watch Humor Hungary Hunt For The Great White Defendant Hunter Biden Hunter-Gatherers I.F. Stone I.Q. I.Q. Genomics #IBelieveInHavenMonahan ICC Icj Ideas Identity Ideology And Worldview IDF Idiocracy Igbo Igor Shafarevich Ilan Pappe Ilhan Omar Illegal Immigration Ilyushin IMF Impeachment Imperialism Imran Awan Inbreeding Income India Indian Indian IQ Indians Individualism Indo-Europeans Indonesia Inequality Inflation Intelligence Intelligence Agencies Intelligent Design International International Affairs International Comparisons International Court Of Justice International Criminal Court International Relations Internet Interracial Marriage Interracism Intersectionality Intifada Intra-Racism Intraracism Invade Invite In Hock Invade The World Invite The World Iosef Stalin Iosif Stalin Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iranian Nuclear Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Irish Is Love Colorblind Isaac Herzog ISIS Islam Islamic Jihad Islamic State Islamism Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Bonds Israel Defense Force Israel Defense Forces Israel Separation Wall Israeli Occupation IT Italy Itamar Ben-Gvir It's Okay To Be White Ivanka Ivy League J Street Jacky Rosen Jair Bolsonaro Jake Sullivan Jake Tapper Jamal Khashoggi James Angleton James B. Watson James Clapper James Comey James Forrestal James Jeffrey James Mattis James Watson Janet Yellen Janice Yellen Japan Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Greenblatt JASTA JCPOA JD Vance Jeb Bush Jeffrey Epstein Jeffrey Goldberg Jeffrey Sachs Jen Psaki Jennifer Rubin Jens Stoltenberg Jeremy Corbyn Jerry Seinfeld Jerusalem Jerusalem Post Jesuits Jesus Jesus Christ Jewish Genetics Jewish History Jewish Intellectuals Jewish Power Jewish Power Party Jewish Supremacism JFK Assassination JFK Jr. Jihadis Jill Stein Jimmy Carter Jingoism JINSA Joe Lieberman Joe Rogan John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John F. Kennedy John Hagee John Hawks John Kirby John Kiriakou John McCain John McLaughlin John Mearsheimer Joker Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Greenblatt Jonathan Pollard Jordan Peterson Joseph McCarthy Josh Gottheimer Josh Paul Journalism Judaism Judea Judge George Daniels Judicial System Julian Assange Jussie Smollett Justice Justin Trudeau Kaboom Kahanists Kaiser Wilhelm Kamala Harris Kamala On Her Knees Kanye West Karabakh War 2020 Karen Kwiatkowski Karine Jean-Pierre Kashmir Kata'ib Hezbollah Kay Bailey Hutchison Kazakhstan Keir Starmer Kenneth Marcus Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Williamson Khazars Khrushchev Kids Kim Jong Un Kinship Kkk KKKrazy Glue Of The Coalition Of The Fringes Knesset Kompromat Korea Korean War Kosovo Kris Kobach Kristi Noem Ku Klux Klan Kubrick Kurds Kushner Foundation Kyle Rittenhouse Kyrie Irving Language Laos Larry C. Johnson Late Obama Age Collapse Latin America Latinos Laura Loomer Law Lawfare LDNR Lead Poisoning Leahy Amendments Leahy Law Lebanon Lee Kuan Yew Leftism Lenin Leo Frank Leo Strauss Let's Talk About My Hair LGBT LGBTI Liberal Opposition Liberal Whites Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libya Light Skin Preference Lindsey Graham Linguistics Literacy Literature Lithuania Litvinenko Living Standards Liz Cheney Liz Truss Lloyd Austin Localism long-range-missile-defense Longevity Looting Lord Of The Rings Lorde Los Angeles Loudoun County Louis Farrakhan Love And Marriage Low-fat Lukashenko Lula Lyndon B Johnson Lyndon Johnson Madeleine Albright Mafia MAGA Magnitsky Act Malaysia Malaysian Airlines MH17 Manosphere Manufacturing Mao Zedong Map Marco Rubio Maria Butina Marijuana Marine Le Pen Marjorie Taylor Greene Mark Milley Mark Steyn Mark Warner Marriage Martin Luther King Martin Scorsese Marvel Marx Marxism Masculinity Mass Shootings Mate Choice Mathematics Mathilde Krim Matt Gaetz Max Boot Max Weber Maxine Waters Mayans McCain McCain/POW McDonald's Meat Media Media Bias Medicine Medieval Christianity Medieval Russia Mediterranean Diet Medvedev Megan McCain Meghan Markle Mein Obama MEK Mel Gibson Men With Gold Chains Meng Wanzhou Mental Health Mental Illness Mental Traits Meritocracy Merkel Merkel Youth Merkel's Boner Merrick Garland Mexico MH 17 MI-6 Michael Bloomberg Michael Collins PIper Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Michael Jackson Michael Lind Michael McFaul Michael Moore Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michelle Goldberg Michelle Ma Belle Michelle Obama Microaggressions Middle Ages Middle East Migration Mike Huckabee Mike Johnson Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mike Waltz Mikhael Gorbachev Miles Mathis Militarized Police Military Military Analysis Military Budget Military History Military Spending Military Technology Millennials Milner Group Minimum Wage Minneapolis Minorities Miriam Adelson Miscellaneous Misdreavus Mishima Missile Defense Mitch McConnell Mitt Romney Mixed-Race MK-Ultra Mohammed Bin Salman Monarchy Mondoweiss Money Mongolia Mongols Monkeypox Monogamy Moon Landing Hoax Moon Landings Moore's Law Morality Mormonism Mormons Mortality Mortgage Moscow Mossad Movies Muhammad Multiculturalism Music Muslim Ban Muslims Mussolini NAEP Naftali Bennett Nakba NAMs Nancy Pelos Nancy Pelosi Narendra Modi NASA Nation Of Hate Nation Of Islam National Assessment Of Educational Progress National Debt National Endowment For Democracy National Review National Security Strategy National Socialism National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans Natural Gas Nature Vs. Nurture Navalny Affair Navy Standards Nazis Nazism Neandertals Neanderthals Near Abroad Negrolatry Nehru Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolibs Neolithic Neoreaction Netherlands Never Again Education Act New Cold War New Dark Age New Horizon Foundation New Orleans New Silk Road New Tes New World Order New York New York City New York Times New Zealand New Zealand Shooting NFL Nicholas II Nicholas Wade Nick Eberstadt Nick Fuentes Nicolas Maduro Niger Nigeria Nike Nikki Haley NIMBY Nina Jankowicz No Fly Zone Noam Chomsky Nobel Prize Nord Stream Nord Stream Pipelines Nordics Norman Braman Norman Finkelstein Norman Lear North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway Novorossiya NSA NSO Group Nuclear Power Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Nuremberg Nutrition NYPD Obama Obama Presidency Obamacare Obesity Obituary Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Wall Street October Surprise Oedipus Complex OFAC Oil Oil Industry Oklahoma City Bombing Olav Scholz Old Testament Oliver Stone Olympics Open Borders OpenThread Opinion Poll Opioids Orban Organized Crime Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Orwell Osama Bin Laden OTFI Our Soldiers Speak Out Of Africa Model Paganism Pakistan Pakistani Paleoanthropology Paleocons Palestine Palestinians Palin Panhandling Papacy Paper Review Parasite Burden Parenting Parenting Paris Attacks Partly Inbred Extended Family Pat Buchanan Pathogens Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Findley Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Durov Pavel Grudinin Paypal Peace Peak Oil Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Pentagon Personal Genomics Personality Pete Buttgieg Pete Hegseth Peter Frost Peter Thiel Peter Turchin Petro Poroshenko Pew Phil Rushton Philadelphia Philippines Philosophy Phoenicians Phyllis Randall Physiognomy Piers Morgan Pigmentation Pigs Pioneers Piracy PISA Pizzagate POC Ascendancy Podcast Poland Police Police State Polio Political Correctness Makes You Stupid Political Dissolution Political Economy Politicians Politics Polling Pollution Polygamy Polygyny Pope Francis Population Population Genetics Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Porn Pornography Portland Portugal Portuguese Post-Apocalypse Poverty Power Pramila Jayapal PRC Prediction Prescription Drugs President Joe Biden Presidential Race '08 Presidential Race '12 Presidential Race '16 Presidential Race '20 Prince Andrew Prince Harry Priti Patel Privacy Privatization Progressives Propaganda Prostitution protest Protestantism Proud Boys Psychology Psychometrics Psychopathy Public Health Public Schools Puerto Rico Puritans Putin Putin Derangement Syndrome QAnon Qassem Soleimani Qatar Quantitative Genetics Quebec Quiet Skies Quincy Institute R2P Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race/IQ Race Riots Rachel Corrie Racial Purism Racial Reality Racialism Racism Rafah Raj Shah Rand Paul Randy Fine Rap Music Rape Rashida Tlaib Rationality Ray McGovern Raymond Chandler Razib Khan Real Estate RealWorld Recep Tayyip Erdogan Red Sea Refugee Crisis #refugeeswelcome Religion Religion And Philosophy Rentier Reparations Reprint Republican Party Republicans Review Revisionism Rex Tillerson RFK Assassination Ricci Richard Dawkins Richard Goldberg Richard Grenell Richard Haas Richard Haass Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Rightwing Cinema Riots R/k Theory RMAX Robert A. Heinlein Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Ford Robert Kagan Robert Kraft Robert Maxwell Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert O'Brien Robert Reich Robots Rock Music Roe Vs. Wade Roger Waters Rolling Stone Roman Empire Romania Romanticism Rome Ron DeSantis Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rotherham Rothschilds RT International Rudy Giuliani Rush Limbaugh Russiagate Russian Demography Russian Elections 2018 Russian History Russian Media Russian Military Russian Nationalism Russian Occupation Government Russian Orthodox Church Russian Reaction Russians Russophobes Russophobia Russotriumph Ruth Bader Ginsburg Rwanda Sabrina Rubin Erdely Sacha Baron Cohen Sacklers Sailer Strategy Sailer's First Law Of Female Journalism Saint Peter Tear Down This Gate! Saint-Petersburg Salman Rushie Salt Sam Bankman-Fried Sam Francis Samantha Power Samson Option San Bernadino Massacre Sandra Beleza Sandy Hook Sapir-Whorf SAT Satanic Age Satanism Saudi Arabia Scandal Science Denialism Science Fiction Scooter Libby Scotland Scott Ritter Scrabble Sean Hannity Seattle Secession Self Determination Self Indulgence Semites Serbia Sergei Lavrov Sergei Skripal Sergey Glazyev Seth Rich Sex Sex Differences Sex Ratio At Birth Sexual Harassment Sexual Selection Sexuality Seymour Hersh Shai Masot Shakespeare Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Shared Environment Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shireen Abu Akleh Shmuley Boteach Shoah Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shulamit Aloni Shurat HaDin Sigal Mandelker Sigar Pearl Mandelker Sigmund Freud Silicon Valley Singapore Single Men Single Women Sinotriumph Six Day War Sixties SJWs Skin Color Slavery Slavery Reparations Slavoj Zizek Slavs Smart Fraction Social Justice Warriors Social Media Social Science Socialism Society Sociobiology Sociology Sodium Solzhenitsyn Somalia Sotomayor South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea Southeast Asia Soviet History Soviet Union Sovok Space Space Exploration Space Program Spain Spanish Spanish River High School SPLC Sport Sports Srebrenica St Petersburg International Economic Forum Stabby Somali Staffan Stage Stalinism Standardized Tests Star Trek Star Wars Starbucks Starvation Comparisons State Department Statistics Statue Of Liberty Steny Hoyer Stephen Cohen Stephen Harper Stephen Jay Gould Stephen Townsend Stereotypes Steroids Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steven Pinker Strait Of Hormuz Strategic Ambiguity Stuart Levey Stuart Seldowitz Student Debt Stuff White People Like Sub-replacement Fertility Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subhas Chandra Bose Subprime Mortgage Crisis Suburb Suella Braverman Sugar Suicide Superintelligence Supreme Court Surveillance Susan Glasser Svidomy Sweden Switzerland Symington Amendment Syrian Civil War Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Take Action Taliban Talmud Tatars Taxation Taxes Tea Party Technical Considerations Technology Ted Cruz Telegram Television Terrorism Terrorists Terry McAuliffe Tesla Testing Testosterone Tests Texas THAAD Thailand The 10/7 Project The AK The American Conservative The Bell Curve The Bible The Black Autumn The Cathedral The Confederacy The Constitution The Eight Banditos The Family The Free World The Great Awokening The Left The Middle East The New York Times The South The States The Zeroth Amendment To The Constitution Theranos Theresa May Third World Thomas Jefferson Thomas Moorer Thought Crimes Tiananmen Massacre Tibet Tiger Mom TikTok TIMSS Tom Cotton Tom Massie Tom Wolfe Tony Blair Tony Blinken Tony Kleinfeld Too Many White People Torture Trade Trans Fat Trans Fats Transgender Transgenderism Transhumanism Translation Translations Transportation Travel Trayvon Martin Trolling True Redneck Stereotypes Trump Trump Derangement Syndrome Trust Tsarist Russia Tucker Carlson Tulsa Tulsi Gabbard Turkey Turks TWA 800 Twins Twitter Ucla UFOs UK Ukrainian Crisis UN Security Council Unbearable Whiteness Unemployment Unions United Kingdom United Nations United Nations General Assembly United Nations Security Council United States Universal Basic Income UNRWA Urbanization Ursula Von Der Leyen Uruguay US Blacks US Capitol Storming 2021 US Civil War II US Constitution US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 US Regionalism USA USAID USS Liberty USSR Uyghurs Uzbekistan Vaccination Vaccines Valdimir Putin Valerie Plame Vdare Venezuela Vibrancy Victoria Nuland Victorian England Video Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Vikings Viktor Orban Viktor Yanukovych Violence Vioxx Virginia Virginia Israel Advisory Board Vitamin D Vivek Ramaswamy Vladimir Zelensky Volodymur Zelenskyy Volodymyr Zelensky Vote Fraud Voter Fraud Voting Rights Voting Rights Act Vulcan Society Wall Street Walmart Wang Ching Wei Wang Jingwei War War Crimes War Guilt War In Donbass War On Christmas War On Terror War Powers War Powers Act Warhammer Washington DC WASPs Watergate Wealth Wealth Inequality Wealthy Web Traffic Weight WEIRDO Welfare Wendy Sherman West Bank Western Decline Western European Marriage Pattern Western Hypocrisy Western Media Western Religion Western Revival Westerns White America White Americans White Death White Flight White Guilt White Helmets White Liberals White Man's Burden White Nakba White Nationalism White Nationalists White People White Privilege White Slavery White Supremacy White Teachers Whiterpeople Whites Who Whom Whoopi Goldberg Wikileaks Wikipedia William Browder William F. Buckley William Kristol William Latson William McGonagle William McRaven WINEP Winston Churchill Woke Capital Women Woodrow Wilson Workers Working Class World Bank World Economic Forum World Health Organization World Population World Values Survey World War G World War H World War Hair World War I World War III World War R World War T World War Weed WTF WVS WWII Xi Jinping Xinjiang Yahya Sinwar Yair Lapid Yemen Yevgeny Prigozhin Yoav Gallant Yogi Berra's Restaurant Yoram Hazony YouTube Yugoslavia Yuval Noah Harari Zbigniew Brzezinski Zimbabwe Zionism Zionists Zvika Fogel
Nothing found
All Commenters •ï¿½My
Comments
•ï¿½Followed
Commenters
�⇅All / On "Norway"
    Oh, so now it’s an Indian guy who did the exploding pagers? Why is the US not investigating this? Why is it left up to Norway? This is the biggest terrorist attack of its kind ever, and the US is just shrugging and ignoring it. It was US money that paid for the Jews to...
  • Anonymous[211] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:

    Fucking stinky, filthy, scammy, horny, braggy, high esteem, low IQ, street-shitting Pajeets are the most despicable people in this world. They will steal, they will lie. These people have absolutely no moral value. The world should do something about these pests.

    •ï¿½Agree: ServesyouallWhite
  • @Charles Pewitt
    Anglo-Saxon Nations Are Under Attack From Asian Indian Invaders

    The Anglo-Saxon Nations -- USA, England, Canada, New Zealand and Australia must remove all foreigners and their spawn, especially Asian Indians.

    Asian Indian Rishi Sunak, the Tory Party PM before Labour Party current PM Keir Starmer, is just as culpable and responsible for the nation-killing mass immigration and multicultural mayhem as Keir Starmer.

    Asian Indian Rishi Sunak and the Tory Party Treasonites push mass immigration and multicultural mayhem.

    Limey Lout Keir Starmer and the Labour Party Treasonites push mass immigration and multicultural mayhem.

    Asian Indian Rishi Sunak Is A Haughty Asian Indian Hindu Goldman Sachs Globalizer Infiltrator.

    Asian Indian Rishi Sunak will hopefully be the last nail in the coffin of the evil and treasonous Tory Party.

    The Tory Party And The Republican Party Both Push Mass Legal Immigration And Mass Illegal Immigration And Multicultural Mayhem.

    Mass Immigration Extremist Kamala Harris and Globalizer Geezer rat 81 year old liar Joe Biden and fat ass Baby Boomer whore Trump have been pushing to flood the USA with hundreds of millions of Asian Indians and extremely haughty Hindus. Part Asian Indian Cat Lady Agenda Coconut, Kamala Harris, is notorious for her treasonous desire to flood hundreds of millions of Asian Indians into the Anglo-Saxon nations: USA, England, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.

    These Asian Indian Haughty Hindus are so haughty that they have foreigner SLAVES and these arrogant foreigner interlopers Hindus are infesting New Jersey and many many other USA states.

    Kamala Harris is a partial HAUGHTY HINDU of the worst sort I have ever seen and Trump and Biden and Kamala Harris have been plotting and scheming to cram hundreds of millions of Asian Indians and Haughty Hindus into the USA.

    Kamala Harris and Biden and Trump have crawled into bed with the CHEAP LABOR FACTION of the JEW/WASP Ruling Class of the American Empire and Trump and Biden and Harris want to completely and totally destroy cultural cohesion in the USA.

    Kamala Harris and Biden and Trump have weaponized the mass immigration invasion of the USA and they are attacking the European Christian ancestral core of the USA and the historic American nation.

    I hereby challenge Trump and Biden and Kamala Harris to a 4 hour debate on mass legal immigration and mass illegal immigration and REFUGEE OVERLOAD and ASYLUM SEEKER INUNDATION and multicultural mayhem and American national identity and monetary policy and foreign policy and financialization and globalization and anti-White attacks and the evil machinations of the JEW/WASP Ruling Class of the American Empire.

    Mass legal immigration, mass illegal immigration, REFUGEE OVERLOAD and ASYLUM SEEKER INUNDATION increases housing costs, lowers wages, swamps schools, overwhelms hospitals, destroys habitat for wildlife, causes urban and suburban sprawl, creates multicultural mayhem and brings infectious diseases, crime and terrorism to England and the United States of America.

    IMMIGRATION MORATORIUM NOW

    DEPORT ALL ILLEGAL ALIEN INVADERS NOW

    HAUGHTY ASIAN INDIAN HINDUS MUST BE DEPORTED FROM ENGLAND, THE USA AND THE OTHER ANGLO-SAXON NATIONS

    ASIAN INDIANS IN CELTIC NATIONS MUST BE DEPORTED

    ASIAN INDIANS IN ALL EUROPEAN CHRISTIAN NATIONS MUST BE DEPORTED

    https://twitter.com/AnnCoulter/status/1804364658750447625

    Tweet from 2021:

    https://twitter.com/AnnCoulter/status/1392621148555382785

    https://twitter.com/PCleburneVdare/status/1809258009127694461

    Replies: @ServesyouallWhite

    OUT-STANDING post. Indians are absolute bastards. You cannot reason with, placate, compromise, partner with or have anything to do with the street shitters if you are non-Indian. I have seen Indians in management positions treat even lower caste Indians better than non-Indians.

    Indians are especially hostile to Whites & blacks but are willing to breed with Whites so their children are as light complexioned as possible. Which is prized in their toilet bowl of a country.

    I’ve said it on here before, the main problem is that White Westerners protect, empower and enable these parasites. Complain to your White boss about a pajeet or pajeeta and be promptly branded an envious racist who is unjustifiably attacking the hardest working, most skilled, MVPs in the corporation

    As for slavery, no surprise there, but what may surprise you is that in those cases, often times it is the pajeeta who is behind the cruelty. Indian women are malignantly narcissistic, extremely haughty and usually raise both male and female spawn to be completely self-important, self-entitled assholes even if those children are raised in foreign nations, hence, Sunak, Haley, Ramaswamy, Jindal, and of course Harris.

    When there is no danger of penalties, it is the Pajeeta, like the hook-nosed bitch in your post photo, who do the things to the domestic workers like pour scalding water on them, beatings with objects, hair pulling, kicking etc.

    I’ve read about one account where a slave owner Pajeeta beat her Filipina domestic cook with a frozen chicken until bones were broken.

    If I am hard on the White race, it’s because of shit like this which was largely enabled by 99%’er Whites.

  • @Anonymous
    Indians support Israel because Israel is anti Muslim.

    Simple as that.

    Replies: @ServesyouallWhite

    Indians support Israel because Indians are self-interested scheming con-artists who schmooze and suck up to the most powerful non-Indian faction. First it was Western Whites, now because Western Whites are increasingly less powerful. The Indians shifted their attention to Jews.

    The joke is on the pajeets & pajeetas though, Kikes are as racist and xenophobic as the street shitters are. Oh they will use the Indians like toilet paper and flush afterwards, with toilet paper being something Indians are totally unfamiliar with.

  • Anon[352] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:
    @Event Horizon
    @RedPill Boomer

    I have discovered many in America who seem to suffer from this same malaise, chiefly found in Baptist congregations. Not all of them - I've attended a couple Baptist churches where they did not hold this bizarre outlook.

    But an increasing number of Christians seem intent on reinventing themselves as crypto-Jews for whatever strange reason. Looking ahead, when I encounter them, I will tell them 'you are not a Christian and you shouldn't call yourself one - you're a Zionist, and Zionism is found nowhere in the King James Bible. Zionism is sin.'

    Let's see how that goes over.

    Replies: @Anon

    ‘you are not a Christian and you shouldn’t call yourself one – you’re a Zionist, and Zionism is found nowhere in the King James Bible. Zionism is sin.’

    Nice sentiment, however, if you take the time to actually read the Torah critically, you’ll find that it’s all about Zionist Supremacy – as a matter of fact, it’s nothing but Zionist Supremacy.

    Now, should you also happen to recognize that Yahweh is a literal fucking demon in the form of a single middle-aged wine mom with Borderline Personality Disorder comorbid with Psychopathy, you’re really paying attention.

    Yahweh = Mommy Dearest

  • CCG says:
    @Event Horizon
    @Tommy X

    Will western countries still be desirable places to reside once they've been drowned in Third World levels of corruption, disease, crime, violence and filth?

    Replies: @CCG
    •ï¿½Thanks: Event Horizon, tamberlint
  • This Indian scumbag should be chased by someone who can administer the death penalty (after due legal process of course, even one by an ad hoc “decent people’s court”) and not by Norway.

    •ï¿½Agree: ServesyouallWhite
  • “Norwegain-Indian”

    lol, lmao even

    In time many walls will be faced

  • @Tommy X
    Indians favor Jews because Indians know that Jewish internationalist schemes such as DEI and CRT and ESG make it possible for millions of Indians to immigrate easily to Western countries.

    India is now the most highly populated country in the world, surpassing China in population, and immigration is the primary method that India is using to alleviate overcrowding.

    Jewish schemes have also made some Indians into multi-millionaires in the US because Indians are Asian diversity, and Indians can take advantage of DEI schemes such as Affirmative Action and federal set-aside contracts that favor businesses owned by federal protected class victim cultists.

    Replies: @Gerald the Frog, @Event Horizon

    Will western countries still be desirable places to reside once they’ve been drowned in Third World levels of corruption, disease, crime, violence and filth?

    •ï¿½Replies: @CCG
    @Event Horizon

    Short answer, NO. Goa is a classic example of the transformation of a European-adjacent society into a Third World dungheap in less than a century due to unlimited mass immigration from the rest of India.

    https://www.thegoan.net/goa-news/dump-of-mixed-waste-along-opinion-poll-road-in-margao-turning-into-an-eyesore/119231.html
    https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/goa-man-20-arrested-in-connection-with-canadian-national-s-murder-101721226905705.html
    https://www.heraldgoa.in/Goa/Cops-crack-Calangute-murder-case-arrest-two-property-brokers-/225223
    https://www.heraldgoa.in/goa/two-bihari-accused-arrested-for-rape-and-murder-of-5yearold-girl-remanded-in-police-custody/220169

    But people from other states are still trying to push their way in (with the help of non-Goans already in Goa) because their native places are still that much worse than Goa.

    https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/south-asia/noise-pollution-pesky-instagrammers-goa-s-residents-have-had-enough-of-overtourism
    https://www.gomantaktimes.com/opinion/frankly-frank-concrete-dreams-eroding-goas-fabric
    https://indianexpress.com/article/india/obnoxious-real-estate-firms-ad-on-conquering-goa-angers-state-govt-9564866/
  • @RedPill Boomer
    There's this cult in India whose people think they actually are Jews.

    Replies: @Event Horizon

    I have discovered many in America who seem to suffer from this same malaise, chiefly found in Baptist congregations. Not all of them – I’ve attended a couple Baptist churches where they did not hold this bizarre outlook.

    But an increasing number of Christians seem intent on reinventing themselves as crypto-Jews for whatever strange reason. Looking ahead, when I encounter them, I will tell them ‘you are not a Christian and you shouldn’t call yourself one – you’re a Zionist, and Zionism is found nowhere in the King James Bible. Zionism is sin.’

    Let’s see how that goes over.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Anon
    @Event Horizon


    ‘you are not a Christian and you shouldn’t call yourself one – you’re a Zionist, and Zionism is found nowhere in the King James Bible. Zionism is sin.’
    �
    Nice sentiment, however, if you take the time to actually read the Torah critically, you'll find that it's all about Zionist Supremacy - as a matter of fact, it's nothing but Zionist Supremacy.

    Now, should you also happen to recognize that Yahweh is a literal fucking demon in the form of a single middle-aged wine mom with Borderline Personality Disorder comorbid with Psychopathy, you're really paying attention.

    Yahweh = Mommy Dearest
  • @Tommy X
    Indians favor Jews because Indians know that Jewish internationalist schemes such as DEI and CRT and ESG make it possible for millions of Indians to immigrate easily to Western countries.

    India is now the most highly populated country in the world, surpassing China in population, and immigration is the primary method that India is using to alleviate overcrowding.

    Jewish schemes have also made some Indians into multi-millionaires in the US because Indians are Asian diversity, and Indians can take advantage of DEI schemes such as Affirmative Action and federal set-aside contracts that favor businesses owned by federal protected class victim cultists.

    Replies: @Gerald the Frog, @Event Horizon

    …federal set-aside contracts that favor businesses owned by federal protected class victim cultists.

    This. Must be the same in Europe. What this Tamil was doing in Bulgaria and Scandinavia ? It is very easy for a crook with little computering knowledge ( as there are millions in India thanks to the anglo idiots ) to build fake ” high tech ” societies. Slavic countries in particular with their cheap cost of living attract these kind of low lives. Notice his choice of countries to have access to Slavic and Nordic women.
    Ideal crook for Mossad. Nothing to do with Islam ( or very little )

    •ï¿½Agree: ServesyouallWhite
  • So the Israelis use external tech support too?

  • Anglo-Saxon Nations Are Under Attack From Asian Indian Invaders

    The Anglo-Saxon Nations — USA, England, Canada, New Zealand and Australia must remove all foreigners and their spawn, especially Asian Indians.

    Asian Indian Rishi Sunak, the Tory Party PM before Labour Party current PM Keir Starmer, is just as culpable and responsible for the nation-killing mass immigration and multicultural mayhem as Keir Starmer.

    Asian Indian Rishi Sunak and the Tory Party Treasonites push mass immigration and multicultural mayhem.

    Limey Lout Keir Starmer and the Labour Party Treasonites push mass immigration and multicultural mayhem.

    Asian Indian Rishi Sunak Is A Haughty Asian Indian Hindu Goldman Sachs Globalizer Infiltrator.

    Asian Indian Rishi Sunak will hopefully be the last nail in the coffin of the evil and treasonous Tory Party.

    The Tory Party And The Republican Party Both Push Mass Legal Immigration And Mass Illegal Immigration And Multicultural Mayhem.

    Mass Immigration Extremist Kamala Harris and Globalizer Geezer rat 81 year old liar Joe Biden and fat ass Baby Boomer whore Trump have been pushing to flood the USA with hundreds of millions of Asian Indians and extremely haughty Hindus. Part Asian Indian Cat Lady Agenda Coconut, Kamala Harris, is notorious for her treasonous desire to flood hundreds of millions of Asian Indians into the Anglo-Saxon nations: USA, England, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.

    These Asian Indian Haughty Hindus are so haughty that they have foreigner SLAVES and these arrogant foreigner interlopers Hindus are infesting New Jersey and many many other USA states.

    Kamala Harris is a partial HAUGHTY HINDU of the worst sort I have ever seen and Trump and Biden and Kamala Harris have been plotting and scheming to cram hundreds of millions of Asian Indians and Haughty Hindus into the USA.

    Kamala Harris and Biden and Trump have crawled into bed with the CHEAP LABOR FACTION of the JEW/WASP Ruling Class of the American Empire and Trump and Biden and Harris want to completely and totally destroy cultural cohesion in the USA.

    Kamala Harris and Biden and Trump have weaponized the mass immigration invasion of the USA and they are attacking the European Christian ancestral core of the USA and the historic American nation.

    I hereby challenge Trump and Biden and Kamala Harris to a 4 hour debate on mass legal immigration and mass illegal immigration and REFUGEE OVERLOAD and ASYLUM SEEKER INUNDATION and multicultural mayhem and American national identity and monetary policy and foreign policy and financialization and globalization and anti-White attacks and the evil machinations of the JEW/WASP Ruling Class of the American Empire.

    Mass legal immigration, mass illegal immigration, REFUGEE OVERLOAD and ASYLUM SEEKER INUNDATION increases housing costs, lowers wages, swamps schools, overwhelms hospitals, destroys habitat for wildlife, causes urban and suburban sprawl, creates multicultural mayhem and brings infectious diseases, crime and terrorism to England and the United States of America.

    IMMIGRATION MORATORIUM NOW

    DEPORT ALL ILLEGAL ALIEN INVADERS NOW

    HAUGHTY ASIAN INDIAN HINDUS MUST BE DEPORTED FROM ENGLAND, THE USA AND THE OTHER ANGLO-SAXON NATIONS

    ASIAN INDIANS IN CELTIC NATIONS MUST BE DEPORTED

    ASIAN INDIANS IN ALL EUROPEAN CHRISTIAN NATIONS MUST BE DEPORTED

    Tweet from 2021:

    •ï¿½Agree: ServesyouallWhite
    •ï¿½Replies: @ServesyouallWhite
    @Charles Pewitt

    OUT-STANDING post. Indians are absolute bastards. You cannot reason with, placate, compromise, partner with or have anything to do with the street shitters if you are non-Indian. I have seen Indians in management positions treat even lower caste Indians better than non-Indians.

    Indians are especially hostile to Whites & blacks but are willing to breed with Whites so their children are as light complexioned as possible. Which is prized in their toilet bowl of a country.

    I've said it on here before, the main problem is that White Westerners protect, empower and enable these parasites. Complain to your White boss about a pajeet or pajeeta and be promptly branded an envious racist who is unjustifiably attacking the hardest working, most skilled, MVPs in the corporation

    As for slavery, no surprise there, but what may surprise you is that in those cases, often times it is the pajeeta who is behind the cruelty. Indian women are malignantly narcissistic, extremely haughty and usually raise both male and female spawn to be completely self-important, self-entitled assholes even if those children are raised in foreign nations, hence, Sunak, Haley, Ramaswamy, Jindal, and of course Harris.

    When there is no danger of penalties, it is the Pajeeta, like the hook-nosed bitch in your post photo, who do the things to the domestic workers like pour scalding water on them, beatings with objects, hair pulling, kicking etc.

    I've read about one account where a slave owner Pajeeta beat her Filipina domestic cook with a frozen chicken until bones were broken.

    If I am hard on the White race, it's because of shit like this which was largely enabled by 99%'er Whites.
  • Anonymous[323] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:

    Strangely enough, subcon Indians have a muted and grudging respect and fascination for white nationalism, which they dare not speak.
    They are drawn to white nationalism like moths to a flame because of some exceedingly powerful atavistic forces which are, in reality, literally written into the Indian DNA, that is, the essence and struggle of white nationalism is basically the same story as the fastest stratification of the Indian people.
    Notice too, how the official Indian government policy of discrimination against the higher fastest resonates with western governments official discrimination against white men.

  • If he does know anything surely Mossad will just terminate him?

  • The warrant issued is a yellow one, not red.

    So Rinson Jose is not wanted for arrest because he is not charged with any crime.

    He is a missing person last seen entering the US at Boston Logan International Airport.

    •ï¿½Thanks: Adam Birchdale
  • Indians favor Jews because Indians know that Jewish internationalist schemes such as DEI and CRT and ESG make it possible for millions of Indians to immigrate easily to Western countries.

    India is now the most highly populated country in the world, surpassing China in population, and immigration is the primary method that India is using to alleviate overcrowding.

    Jewish schemes have also made some Indians into multi-millionaires in the US because Indians are Asian diversity, and Indians can take advantage of DEI schemes such as Affirmative Action and federal set-aside contracts that favor businesses owned by federal protected class victim cultists.

    •ï¿½Agree: ServesyouallWhite
    •ï¿½Replies: @Gerald the Frog
    @Tommy X

    ...federal set-aside contracts that favor businesses owned by federal protected class victim cultists.

    This. Must be the same in Europe. What this Tamil was doing in Bulgaria and Scandinavia ? It is very easy for a crook with little computering knowledge ( as there are millions in India thanks to the anglo idiots ) to build fake " high tech " societies. Slavic countries in particular with their cheap cost of living attract these kind of low lives. Notice his choice of countries to have access to Slavic and Nordic women.
    Ideal crook for Mossad. Nothing to do with Islam ( or very little )
    , @Event Horizon
    @Tommy X

    Will western countries still be desirable places to reside once they've been drowned in Third World levels of corruption, disease, crime, violence and filth?

    Replies: @CCG
  • Why are Indians obsessed with the Jews?

    My theory is that Indians love Jews because Indians are wannabe Anglos. And as with any wannabe, they try way too hard and end up overdoing it. Indians see the Anglo adoration of Jewry, so they mimic it with the maximum possible enthusiasm. Indians are also just naturally a race of scummy lickspittles. Indians see that Jews have power, so their natural inclination is to kiss their asses as hard as possible.

    •ï¿½Agree: sanecat67, ServesyouallWhite
  • There’s this cult in India whose people think they actually are Jews.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Event Horizon
    @RedPill Boomer

    I have discovered many in America who seem to suffer from this same malaise, chiefly found in Baptist congregations. Not all of them - I've attended a couple Baptist churches where they did not hold this bizarre outlook.

    But an increasing number of Christians seem intent on reinventing themselves as crypto-Jews for whatever strange reason. Looking ahead, when I encounter them, I will tell them 'you are not a Christian and you shouldn't call yourself one - you're a Zionist, and Zionism is found nowhere in the King James Bible. Zionism is sin.'

    Let's see how that goes over.

    Replies: @Anon
  • Oh where, oh where, has my Rinson Jose gone?
    Oh where, oh where, can he be?
    What the Mossad cut off can’t be put back on
    Oh where, oh where, can he be?

  • Anonymous[307] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:
    @Teilhard
    Thank you. A telling point -- why put out a warrant for something that is not a crime, but if it is a crime, why the broad endorsement, or even, disgustingly, the jokes: “The deadly pager operation in Lebanon is no laughing matter. Or is it?†https://www.jta.org/2024/09/19/israel/the-deadly-pager-operation-in-lebanon-is-no-laughing-matter-or-is-it

    Jews in Israel and elsewhere think it’s funny that Mossad blinds, maims, castrates and kills ordinary Lebanese by sabotaging common communication devices. Memes abound. Rabbis approve: "Candidly, I thought they were hilarious.â€

    Media morality. It reminds of when the FBI was asked why its warrant for Osama bin Laden did not include a charge for 9/11. The FBI said, because we have no evidence for that. Say what you want about the FBI, you have to give them points for that.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    A meme going round is of a photo of a pager, the script on the pager reading “FROM THE LIVER TO THE KNEE”.

  • Anonymous[307] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:

    Indians support Israel because Israel is anti Muslim.

    Simple as that.

    •ï¿½Replies: @ServesyouallWhite
    @Anonymous

    Indians support Israel because Indians are self-interested scheming con-artists who schmooze and suck up to the most powerful non-Indian faction. First it was Western Whites, now because Western Whites are increasingly less powerful. The Indians shifted their attention to Jews.

    The joke is on the pajeets & pajeetas though, Kikes are as racist and xenophobic as the street shitters are. Oh they will use the Indians like toilet paper and flush afterwards, with toilet paper being something Indians are totally unfamiliar with.
  • Them ruby dot noggins are hoping that the hebes will help them with their country’s lack of enough shitters problem.

  • Thank you. A telling point — why put out a warrant for something that is not a crime, but if it is a crime, why the broad endorsement, or even, disgustingly, the jokes: “The deadly pager operation in Lebanon is no laughing matter. Or is it?†https://www.jta.org/2024/09/19/israel/the-deadly-pager-operation-in-lebanon-is-no-laughing-matter-or-is-it

    Jews in Israel and elsewhere think it’s funny that Mossad blinds, maims, castrates and kills ordinary Lebanese by sabotaging common communication devices. Memes abound. Rabbis approve: “Candidly, I thought they were hilarious.â€

    Media morality. It reminds of when the FBI was asked why its warrant for Osama bin Laden did not include a charge for 9/11. The FBI said, because we have no evidence for that. Say what you want about the FBI, you have to give them points for that.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Anonymous
    @Teilhard

    A meme going round is of a photo of a pager, the script on the pager reading "FROM THE LIVER TO THE KNEE".
  • Black metal is a musical subgenre that grew out of death metal and, more broadly, heavy metal. In general, it pushes certain aspects of this genre to even farther extremes: fast tempos, shrieking vocals, and violent stage acts. Black metal bands can be found almost anywhere—Europe, North America, East Asia, even Indonesia and Israel. In...
  • @Tom_R
    JEWISH CONTROLLED GOVT. USING JEWISH FABRICATED RELIGION TO EXTERMINATE WHITES—TIME TO GET OUT!

    Thanks for the interesting article, Sir, with lots of useful information.

    The anger of white nationals at our govt. crime of importing large number of 3rd world aliens is very understandable. And it is a shame that Christianity is hand in glove in that crime against the white people.

    That is another reason it is time to get out of the African cult of Christianity, a patently Jewish fabrication. It is the kiss of death of the white race. And that is on top of the fact that Jewsus never existed and, if he did, he was a black man:

    See jesusneverexisted.com

    And if he existed (just in case), he was a dark/black man, as shown in a forensic reconstruction of inhabitants of that area from that time:

    http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/health/a234/1282186/

    It is disgusting to worship a black man inside the church under the delusion you will be “saved†when blacks are killing whites in the streets outside.

    To all these frustrated teens who are burning churches, there is a better option—hand out flyers to all people pointing out that Jewsus never existed. Or start a Norwegian face book group pointing out that Jewsus never existed with link to jesusneverexisted.com and other sites urging people to get out of the African/Middle Eastern cult of Christianity.

    And start a group or a temple to revive old European ancient religions of our ancestors, such as Odinism, etc.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heathenry_(new_religious_movement)

    Replies: @Tom_R, @Anonymous, @Seraphim, @AKAHorace

    I thought that obsessing over the second world war was a dead end and wished that we thought more about the rest of history was the way out. You have proved me wrong.

    Who cares if Jesus was a black rastafarian rapper. Or if he was crucified by the Romans or Jews. If Odin was anti immigration or not.

    Can we talk about here and now ? Or that the idea that politicians should not try to win elections by importing a new electorate ?

  • In the past couple of weeks, thanks to the president’s racist comments about Haiti and African countries he can’t even name -- remember “Nambiaâ€? -- as well as the stamp of approval he awarded future immigrants from Norway, we’ve seen a surprising amount of commentary about that fortunate country. Let me just say: those Norwegians...
  • How stupid. Not once mentioning that there are 5 million Norwegians. The shithole countries have about 5 billion

  • @Tulips
    @ThreeCranes

    Napoleon thought that, too. He sold the Louisiana Territory, which is the entire middle of the USA, to the Thomas Jefferson administration, and then sent an army to conquer it back. This army was to stop off in Haiti and put down a slave revolt. The Haitian leader had taught himself Latin and had read Julius Caesar's diaries describing his conquest of what is now France, Belgium, and Holland. The slaves used Caesar's tactics and gave Napoleon his first ever defeat. It was the only successful slave revolt in human history. The white imperialist slave-trading nations never forgave that, and made sure that Haiti would be forever punished and impoverished. When Haiti finally elected a socialist president who started reforms to improve Haiti, the Bill Clinton administration, with the help of nice, socialist, white Canada, had him kidnapped and dropped in Africa. Haiti is a shit-hole because the USA and its white-nation friends have for 2 centuries made sure it would be a shit-hole. Norway has a very different history.

    Replies: @Tulips, @Daniel Chieh

    The slaves used Caesar’s tactics and gave Napoleon his first ever defeat. It was the only successful slave revolt in human history.

    And demonstrated their superior humanity by kicking off a proper white genocide.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1804_Haiti_massacre

  • Tulips says:
    @Tulips
    @ThreeCranes

    Napoleon thought that, too. He sold the Louisiana Territory, which is the entire middle of the USA, to the Thomas Jefferson administration, and then sent an army to conquer it back. This army was to stop off in Haiti and put down a slave revolt. The Haitian leader had taught himself Latin and had read Julius Caesar's diaries describing his conquest of what is now France, Belgium, and Holland. The slaves used Caesar's tactics and gave Napoleon his first ever defeat. It was the only successful slave revolt in human history. The white imperialist slave-trading nations never forgave that, and made sure that Haiti would be forever punished and impoverished. When Haiti finally elected a socialist president who started reforms to improve Haiti, the Bill Clinton administration, with the help of nice, socialist, white Canada, had him kidnapped and dropped in Africa. Haiti is a shit-hole because the USA and its white-nation friends have for 2 centuries made sure it would be a shit-hole. Norway has a very different history.

    Replies: @Tulips, @Daniel Chieh

    (Continuing my reply to Three Cranes) The historical fact is, that the middle of the USA, from the Gulf Of Mexico to the Canadian border, including many of the “red states” who support Trump, that whole territory is part of the USA thanks to the intelligent, enterprising, freedom-loving people of Haiti. If it were not for them, Napoleon would have retaken it as French territory, and all of those Trump supporters might be now speaking French, and lamenting that they have a pretty-boy idiot now running their French government.

  • Tulips says:
    @ThreeCranes
    But you miss Trump's very point. Haitians are not and can never be (because of genetics) Norwegians and no amount of money you throw at them will change this unalterable, biological fact. Go ahead, flush more money down that sh*thole. It's as bottomless as your clueless, factually-challenged ignorance.

    Biology is Destiny.

    Replies: @Tulips

    Napoleon thought that, too. He sold the Louisiana Territory, which is the entire middle of the USA, to the Thomas Jefferson administration, and then sent an army to conquer it back. This army was to stop off in Haiti and put down a slave revolt. The Haitian leader had taught himself Latin and had read Julius Caesar’s diaries describing his conquest of what is now France, Belgium, and Holland. The slaves used Caesar’s tactics and gave Napoleon his first ever defeat. It was the only successful slave revolt in human history. The white imperialist slave-trading nations never forgave that, and made sure that Haiti would be forever punished and impoverished. When Haiti finally elected a socialist president who started reforms to improve Haiti, the Bill Clinton administration, with the help of nice, socialist, white Canada, had him kidnapped and dropped in Africa. Haiti is a shit-hole because the USA and its white-nation friends have for 2 centuries made sure it would be a shit-hole. Norway has a very different history.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Tulips
    @Tulips

    (Continuing my reply to Three Cranes) The historical fact is, that the middle of the USA, from the Gulf Of Mexico to the Canadian border, including many of the "red states" who support Trump, that whole territory is part of the USA thanks to the intelligent, enterprising, freedom-loving people of Haiti. If it were not for them, Napoleon would have retaken it as French territory, and all of those Trump supporters might be now speaking French, and lamenting that they have a pretty-boy idiot now running their French government.
    , @Daniel Chieh
    @Tulips


    The slaves used Caesar’s tactics and gave Napoleon his first ever defeat. It was the only successful slave revolt in human history.
    �
    And demonstrated their superior humanity by kicking off a proper white genocide.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1804_Haiti_massacre
  • Tulips says:

    You forgot to mention that school boards all run dental clinics, to give free dental care, including orthodontics, to all children. In 20 years working in Norway, I never heard Norwegians complaining about the high taxes, including a 20% sales tax.

    Norway has 8 or more political parties, so all governments are coalition governments. The major parties are, from the far left, Red Left, Socialist Left, Green, Left, Labor, Right, Center, Christian, and Progress Party on the far right. No libertarian parties. Also, in voting, they do the primary selection of candidates at the same time they do the election: you go into the voting both and pick the ballot for the party you want to elect. Each party has its own ballot, which is a folded paper with the party name on the front. If you don’t care who in the party gets the position, you just leave the booth and put that ballot in the voting box. If you care who in the party gets the position, you open your selected party ballot, and there are all the names of the persons in the party who want the jobs, and you check the names you prefer. Then you leave the both and put that into the voting box. Very efficient. The primary election and the general election are done at the same time. This also means that campaigns are focused on political idealogies and party platforms, NOT on the personalities, genders, debating skills, etc. of the candidates.

  • But you miss Trump’s very point. Haitians are not and can never be (because of genetics) Norwegians and no amount of money you throw at them will change this unalterable, biological fact. Go ahead, flush more money down that sh*thole. It’s as bottomless as your clueless, factually-challenged ignorance.

    Biology is Destiny.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Tulips
    @ThreeCranes

    Napoleon thought that, too. He sold the Louisiana Territory, which is the entire middle of the USA, to the Thomas Jefferson administration, and then sent an army to conquer it back. This army was to stop off in Haiti and put down a slave revolt. The Haitian leader had taught himself Latin and had read Julius Caesar's diaries describing his conquest of what is now France, Belgium, and Holland. The slaves used Caesar's tactics and gave Napoleon his first ever defeat. It was the only successful slave revolt in human history. The white imperialist slave-trading nations never forgave that, and made sure that Haiti would be forever punished and impoverished. When Haiti finally elected a socialist president who started reforms to improve Haiti, the Bill Clinton administration, with the help of nice, socialist, white Canada, had him kidnapped and dropped in Africa. Haiti is a shit-hole because the USA and its white-nation friends have for 2 centuries made sure it would be a shit-hole. Norway has a very different history.

    Replies: @Tulips, @Daniel Chieh
  • white people can make social democracy work.

    note how this supposed ‘leftist’ chants the corporate line on women in employment.

  • I stopped reading after “thanks to the president’s racist comments about Haiti and African countries he can’t even name.”

  • Interesting to note that mean old Sylvi Listhaug is apparently one of the most popular Norwegian ministers as well (or at least was back in 2016 but I doubt that much has changed since then). But they are all precious little socialist angels, God bless them!

  • I wrote the above last January, fearing that Europe would see an acceleration of the massive demographic change already under away—the Great Replacement, to use a term coined by Renaud Camus: Oh, the Great Replacement needs no definition. It isn't a concept. It's a phenomenon, as obvious as the nose on your face. To observe...
  • @Rehmat
    @Hitler

    Neyth Nethanyahu - When was the last time you opened the Holy Talmud? Israeli historian Israel Shahak called it the most hate religious literature in the world. It curses Jesus, Mary and Christians. Holy Qur'an on the other hand, raises Jesus and Mary to the level of prophet Moses and his mother.

    If Hitler loved Muslims, how come he never higher a single Muslim in his administration, which was loaded with Christians and Jews.

    Nazi army had 150,000 German Jews but not a single Muslim.

    In October 2015, Netanyahu told the 37th World Zionist Congress that Adolf Hitler only wanted to expel the German Jews, but he was advised by Palestinian Mufti al-Haj Amin al-Husseini (d. 1974 in Lebanon) to exterminate the Jews.....

    http://rehmat1.com/2015/10/22/netanyahu-absolves-hitler-of-holocaust/

    Replies: @This Is Our Home, @random observer, @RadicalCenter

    Rehmat: I can’t believe that you are really asking, in good faith, why there were no Muslims in the Nazi government. The reason, as you surely know, is that there ALMOST ZERO muslims in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland at that time — what a lovely state of affairs, too!

    Hopefully it will be that way again in Europe and North America….

  • @Peter Frost
    The only way how to stop massive migration is to remove the causes which bring it about. Wars, destruction of countries, economic misery, etc.

    War is at most a facilitator. Even without Western meddling in Libya and Syria, the dike would have given way somewhere else. Yes, we should help poorer countries, but much of our help has actually made things worse. Remember the food aid we sent to Ethiopia in 1984-85? At that time, its population was 41 million. Now it's twice that number.

    Nazi army had 150,000 German Jews but not a single Muslim.

    The SS had a largely Muslim division.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/13th_Waffen_Mountain_Division_of_the_SS_Handschar_(1st_Croatian)#Composition

    In any case, we shouldn't be viewing present events through the lens of WWII. We are living in a very different world now.

    “Elites†want us to ape the west, to change our culture, and go flapping about tolerancy, progress, and united Europe.

    Elites have always pursued their own interest. What has changed is the growing divergence between elite interest and national interest. It is this factor that is most disquieting. Life can actually get worse for most people, yet the elites will remain on course because they are actually better off.

    Things will really change when the elites find that things are getting bad in their own lives. The United States began to restrict immigration in the 1920s after a wave of anarchist attacks on leading politicians and businessmen.

    Just publicly quit while continuing to write under a pseudonym.

    Sooner or later people would recognize me as the author, either by the sources I quote or by my pedantic writing style. In any case, stuff I write on my blog ends up being recycled in my journal articles.

    The analysis you offer is essentially that Western elites lack the will to resist the intense population pressure from Africa. (Their “universalism†gets the better of them.) This is simply politically stupid. Open borders has been a long-term project of the transnationals.

    By "lack of will" I mean they don't want to resist. They don't want to protect their nations because they believe that nations are obsolete. They say this sort of thing openly.

    Go back to your original blog, Peter. You can then moderate comments

    Unfortunately, I'm already on the "radar screen." This is why I wanted to get a legal opinion on Bill 59. To make a long story short, I will be prosecuted if I'm perceived as being a "soft target" -- a lone blogger without the financial means to mount a successful defense.

    To prevent prosecution, I should:

    - delete comments that would be considered hateful by most people
    - have a legal team on standby
    - become rich and famous

    you wish there was no discussion period about the nature of neurotic, in-bred, control freak Jews.

    Then start your own blog! What's stopping you?

    Anyway at Peter’s own blog there were none of these problems when you went there in 2012 to argue for your IQ hypothesis.

    When I asked Ron about that, he told me he's not the sort of person to carry a grudge.

    Moreover, to ban discussion of Jews is to condemn oneself to militant stupidity and enforced ignorance. Jewish influence is highly significant politically: it is a major vector in Middle East politics, and Jews (racial or religious) Jews make up maybe a third of the billionairiate.

    I'm not politically correct. In several posts, I have discussed the role of Jewish scholars in reviving antiracism in the 1930s. The war on antiracism began as part of the war on Nazism ("racist" was initially a French translation of Völkisch). It continued after the war because both power blocs wanted to win over the hearts and minds of emerging countries in the Third World.

    I have also discussed the role of ethnic networking in the composition of the U.S. Supreme Court. White Protestants have been progressively eliminated from that body because they don't act collectively. They prefer to be rugged individualists, unlike Jewish and Catholic Americans. Guess who wins at the end of the day?

    But unlike certain people I don't believe that Jews explain everything. Are non-Jewish plutocrats better than Jewish ones? I'm sorry but they aren't. Steve Sailer has written recently about the perverse influence of agribusiness on American immigration policy. You'll find that most of those lobbyists are whitebread Americans.

    I reject anti-Semitism not because I'm a pushover but because I feel it is delusional and, as such, prevents us from identifying the causes of the problems we face.

    Would it be intellectually honest of Mr Frost to acknowledge the superiority of his upbringing and culture? Would it be good for Mr Frost to go back to church and rebuild his culture back to what it was?

    I never left my church. My church left me, as it left many other people like myself.

    I considered joining another church, but all of them are going down the same path. I recently dropped by a "conservative" Protestant church to pick up my wife (she was attending a course there). I noticed numerous newspaper clippings about Muslim refugees on the bulletin board. One of them showed people proudly holding a sign "Let them in!!!"

    On issues of family and sexuality, there are some differences among the churches, but often even those differences are cosmetic. Liberal Christians approve of single motherhood because the struggle for personal autonomy requires it. Conservative Christians approve of single motherhood because the fight against abortion requires it. Liberals create "blended families" through divorce. Conservatives create them through international adoption.

    In my opinion, the Great Replacement is the defining issue of our age. Can anyone here point to one church that has spoken out against the Great Replacement? (preferably one within driving distance)

    What makes Canada different?

    Canada began as an ideological construct. It saw itself as a rampart against American liberalism and as a refuge for those Americans who wished to abandon foolish ideas of individualism, atheism, equality, and so forth.

    This view of ourselves was strengthened during the War of 1812, when the U.S. invaded Canada at a time when British forces were tied down in the war against Napoleon. Nonetheless, the limited numbers of British soldiers and Canadian militiamen not only held their own but even managed to seize large stretches of American territory.

    Through most of the early to mid 19th century, there was an expectation that another war would happen. At the time of the American Civil War, Britain and France made plans to intervene on the side of the South. The South would become an independent state, and parts of the North would be annexed to Canada. In addition, the Mexican Republic would be abolished and turned into a monarchy under French direction.

    That never happened, partly because a large part of the British public was sympathetic to the North, partly because Russia was opposed to the planned intervention, and partly because the North was already becoming a strong military power.

    Ideas live longer than their usefulness. As a rampart against American liberalism, Canada was already obsolete by the late 19th century. Then, gradually, the success of the American experiment began to convince many Canadians that we were wrong and they were right. This was especially true after 1945. Britain was bankrupt, and the U.S. seemed to be the model to follow. The U.S. was succeeding on all fronts: geopolitically, economically, technologically, and so on.

    Anti-Americanism still exists but has been reprogrammed. Americans are reproached for not being sufficiently loyal to their liberal ideals. In a sense, anti-Americanism is an American export. It's like the student who prides himself on being better than his teacher.

    Will this change? If change does come, it will probably come first in Quebec, where the penetration of liberalism is more recent and often superficial. This is why anti-hate laws tend to be more draconian in Quebec than elsewhere. You don't need such laws in a society where most people have internalized correct thinking. In the latter case, it's not the police you have to worry about. It's your employer, your spouse, and even your children.

    But consider, Ron won’t let Peter censor comments … so how can Peter be responsible for what commenters say?

    Someone has to take responsibility. If the anonymous commenter won't assume responsibility for his comments, the responsibility falls to the columnist. And if the columnist can't censor the comments, that's his problem. He freely agreed to that arrangement.

    Replies: @German_reader, @Sean

    He freely agreed to that arrangement.

    Yes, even (especially) when it is being presented as a matter of course, never be shepherded (or lulled) into signing off on anything without understanding exactly what you are agreeing to be held to the fire with.

  • Dear Peter Frost,
    Your column is the best thing that fed my intellect this year. The Christian thing to do is to wish you a decent living in 2016 — away from the Unz Review, if that be the case.
    If you allow me to use this space to pay some homage to mr. Unz, I will just say that this site and unz.org are the works of a true hero.

  • – should be “the war on racism” and not “the war on antiracism.”

  • German_reader says:
    @Peter Frost
    The only way how to stop massive migration is to remove the causes which bring it about. Wars, destruction of countries, economic misery, etc.

    War is at most a facilitator. Even without Western meddling in Libya and Syria, the dike would have given way somewhere else. Yes, we should help poorer countries, but much of our help has actually made things worse. Remember the food aid we sent to Ethiopia in 1984-85? At that time, its population was 41 million. Now it's twice that number.

    Nazi army had 150,000 German Jews but not a single Muslim.

    The SS had a largely Muslim division.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/13th_Waffen_Mountain_Division_of_the_SS_Handschar_(1st_Croatian)#Composition

    In any case, we shouldn't be viewing present events through the lens of WWII. We are living in a very different world now.

    “Elites†want us to ape the west, to change our culture, and go flapping about tolerancy, progress, and united Europe.

    Elites have always pursued their own interest. What has changed is the growing divergence between elite interest and national interest. It is this factor that is most disquieting. Life can actually get worse for most people, yet the elites will remain on course because they are actually better off.

    Things will really change when the elites find that things are getting bad in their own lives. The United States began to restrict immigration in the 1920s after a wave of anarchist attacks on leading politicians and businessmen.

    Just publicly quit while continuing to write under a pseudonym.

    Sooner or later people would recognize me as the author, either by the sources I quote or by my pedantic writing style. In any case, stuff I write on my blog ends up being recycled in my journal articles.

    The analysis you offer is essentially that Western elites lack the will to resist the intense population pressure from Africa. (Their “universalism†gets the better of them.) This is simply politically stupid. Open borders has been a long-term project of the transnationals.

    By "lack of will" I mean they don't want to resist. They don't want to protect their nations because they believe that nations are obsolete. They say this sort of thing openly.

    Go back to your original blog, Peter. You can then moderate comments

    Unfortunately, I'm already on the "radar screen." This is why I wanted to get a legal opinion on Bill 59. To make a long story short, I will be prosecuted if I'm perceived as being a "soft target" -- a lone blogger without the financial means to mount a successful defense.

    To prevent prosecution, I should:

    - delete comments that would be considered hateful by most people
    - have a legal team on standby
    - become rich and famous

    you wish there was no discussion period about the nature of neurotic, in-bred, control freak Jews.

    Then start your own blog! What's stopping you?

    Anyway at Peter’s own blog there were none of these problems when you went there in 2012 to argue for your IQ hypothesis.

    When I asked Ron about that, he told me he's not the sort of person to carry a grudge.

    Moreover, to ban discussion of Jews is to condemn oneself to militant stupidity and enforced ignorance. Jewish influence is highly significant politically: it is a major vector in Middle East politics, and Jews (racial or religious) Jews make up maybe a third of the billionairiate.

    I'm not politically correct. In several posts, I have discussed the role of Jewish scholars in reviving antiracism in the 1930s. The war on antiracism began as part of the war on Nazism ("racist" was initially a French translation of Völkisch). It continued after the war because both power blocs wanted to win over the hearts and minds of emerging countries in the Third World.

    I have also discussed the role of ethnic networking in the composition of the U.S. Supreme Court. White Protestants have been progressively eliminated from that body because they don't act collectively. They prefer to be rugged individualists, unlike Jewish and Catholic Americans. Guess who wins at the end of the day?

    But unlike certain people I don't believe that Jews explain everything. Are non-Jewish plutocrats better than Jewish ones? I'm sorry but they aren't. Steve Sailer has written recently about the perverse influence of agribusiness on American immigration policy. You'll find that most of those lobbyists are whitebread Americans.

    I reject anti-Semitism not because I'm a pushover but because I feel it is delusional and, as such, prevents us from identifying the causes of the problems we face.

    Would it be intellectually honest of Mr Frost to acknowledge the superiority of his upbringing and culture? Would it be good for Mr Frost to go back to church and rebuild his culture back to what it was?

    I never left my church. My church left me, as it left many other people like myself.

    I considered joining another church, but all of them are going down the same path. I recently dropped by a "conservative" Protestant church to pick up my wife (she was attending a course there). I noticed numerous newspaper clippings about Muslim refugees on the bulletin board. One of them showed people proudly holding a sign "Let them in!!!"

    On issues of family and sexuality, there are some differences among the churches, but often even those differences are cosmetic. Liberal Christians approve of single motherhood because the struggle for personal autonomy requires it. Conservative Christians approve of single motherhood because the fight against abortion requires it. Liberals create "blended families" through divorce. Conservatives create them through international adoption.

    In my opinion, the Great Replacement is the defining issue of our age. Can anyone here point to one church that has spoken out against the Great Replacement? (preferably one within driving distance)

    What makes Canada different?

    Canada began as an ideological construct. It saw itself as a rampart against American liberalism and as a refuge for those Americans who wished to abandon foolish ideas of individualism, atheism, equality, and so forth.

    This view of ourselves was strengthened during the War of 1812, when the U.S. invaded Canada at a time when British forces were tied down in the war against Napoleon. Nonetheless, the limited numbers of British soldiers and Canadian militiamen not only held their own but even managed to seize large stretches of American territory.

    Through most of the early to mid 19th century, there was an expectation that another war would happen. At the time of the American Civil War, Britain and France made plans to intervene on the side of the South. The South would become an independent state, and parts of the North would be annexed to Canada. In addition, the Mexican Republic would be abolished and turned into a monarchy under French direction.

    That never happened, partly because a large part of the British public was sympathetic to the North, partly because Russia was opposed to the planned intervention, and partly because the North was already becoming a strong military power.

    Ideas live longer than their usefulness. As a rampart against American liberalism, Canada was already obsolete by the late 19th century. Then, gradually, the success of the American experiment began to convince many Canadians that we were wrong and they were right. This was especially true after 1945. Britain was bankrupt, and the U.S. seemed to be the model to follow. The U.S. was succeeding on all fronts: geopolitically, economically, technologically, and so on.

    Anti-Americanism still exists but has been reprogrammed. Americans are reproached for not being sufficiently loyal to their liberal ideals. In a sense, anti-Americanism is an American export. It's like the student who prides himself on being better than his teacher.

    Will this change? If change does come, it will probably come first in Quebec, where the penetration of liberalism is more recent and often superficial. This is why anti-hate laws tend to be more draconian in Quebec than elsewhere. You don't need such laws in a society where most people have internalized correct thinking. In the latter case, it's not the police you have to worry about. It's your employer, your spouse, and even your children.

    But consider, Ron won’t let Peter censor comments … so how can Peter be responsible for what commenters say?

    Someone has to take responsibility. If the anonymous commenter won't assume responsibility for his comments, the responsibility falls to the columnist. And if the columnist can't censor the comments, that's his problem. He freely agreed to that arrangement.

    Replies: @German_reader, @Sean

    “Can anyone here point to one church that has spoken out against the Great Replacement? ”

    But how could they speak out against it? Christianity’s message is universal and colour-blind…there really isn’t a way it could be explicitly pro conserving a specific nation or ethnicity. From a Christian point of view aren’t such things meaningless and destined for oblivion anyway? And given how increasingly godless most Europeans and European-descended peoples nowadays are, it seems to me Christianity and the European world are finally diverging…Christianity’s future is the global south, and the churches are behaving accordingly…why should they care about “racist” white people who mostly aren’t fervent believers anymore anyway?
    The only thing that somewhat mystifies me is the excessive Islamophilia displayed by many Christians (odd given Islam’s role as Christianity’s most effective enemy throughout the ages and the current plight of Mideast Christians), but I suppose it’s motivated by resentment against modern secularism and maybe even an hidden admiration for Muslims (who don’t have to tolerate troublesome atheists but just chop them up).
    In a way, I’m increasingly disillusioned with Western civilization…maybe it was always a mistake. I certainly don’t feel much of a connection with the Christian tradition (and in my badly paid academic job I actually have to work with medieval Christian writings…). But there’s no way back to the pre-Christian past either (which in any case isn’t desirable in many ways) nor any meaningful alternative…it’s a dreadful situation,

  • The only way how to stop massive migration is to remove the causes which bring it about. Wars, destruction of countries, economic misery, etc.

    War is at most a facilitator. Even without Western meddling in Libya and Syria, the dike would have given way somewhere else. Yes, we should help poorer countries, but much of our help has actually made things worse. Remember the food aid we sent to Ethiopia in 1984-85? At that time, its population was 41 million. Now it’s twice that number.

    Nazi army had 150,000 German Jews but not a single Muslim.

    The SS had a largely Muslim division.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/13th_Waffen_Mountain_Division_of_the_SS_Handschar_(1st_Croatian)#Composition

    In any case, we shouldn’t be viewing present events through the lens of WWII. We are living in a very different world now.

    “Elites†want us to ape the west, to change our culture, and go flapping about tolerancy, progress, and united Europe.

    Elites have always pursued their own interest. What has changed is the growing divergence between elite interest and national interest. It is this factor that is most disquieting. Life can actually get worse for most people, yet the elites will remain on course because they are actually better off.

    Things will really change when the elites find that things are getting bad in their own lives. The United States began to restrict immigration in the 1920s after a wave of anarchist attacks on leading politicians and businessmen.

    Just publicly quit while continuing to write under a pseudonym.

    Sooner or later people would recognize me as the author, either by the sources I quote or by my pedantic writing style. In any case, stuff I write on my blog ends up being recycled in my journal articles.

    The analysis you offer is essentially that Western elites lack the will to resist the intense population pressure from Africa. (Their “universalism†gets the better of them.) This is simply politically stupid. Open borders has been a long-term project of the transnationals.

    By “lack of will” I mean they don’t want to resist. They don’t want to protect their nations because they believe that nations are obsolete. They say this sort of thing openly.

    Go back to your original blog, Peter. You can then moderate comments

    Unfortunately, I’m already on the “radar screen.” This is why I wanted to get a legal opinion on Bill 59. To make a long story short, I will be prosecuted if I’m perceived as being a “soft target” — a lone blogger without the financial means to mount a successful defense.

    To prevent prosecution, I should:

    – delete comments that would be considered hateful by most people
    – have a legal team on standby
    – become rich and famous

    you wish there was no discussion period about the nature of neurotic, in-bred, control freak Jews.

    Then start your own blog! What’s stopping you?

    Anyway at Peter’s own blog there were none of these problems when you went there in 2012 to argue for your IQ hypothesis.

    When I asked Ron about that, he told me he’s not the sort of person to carry a grudge.

    Moreover, to ban discussion of Jews is to condemn oneself to militant stupidity and enforced ignorance. Jewish influence is highly significant politically: it is a major vector in Middle East politics, and Jews (racial or religious) Jews make up maybe a third of the billionairiate.

    I’m not politically correct. In several posts, I have discussed the role of Jewish scholars in reviving antiracism in the 1930s. The war on antiracism began as part of the war on Nazism (“racist” was initially a French translation of Völkisch). It continued after the war because both power blocs wanted to win over the hearts and minds of emerging countries in the Third World.

    I have also discussed the role of ethnic networking in the composition of the U.S. Supreme Court. White Protestants have been progressively eliminated from that body because they don’t act collectively. They prefer to be rugged individualists, unlike Jewish and Catholic Americans. Guess who wins at the end of the day?

    But unlike certain people I don’t believe that Jews explain everything. Are non-Jewish plutocrats better than Jewish ones? I’m sorry but they aren’t. Steve Sailer has written recently about the perverse influence of agribusiness on American immigration policy. You’ll find that most of those lobbyists are whitebread Americans.

    I reject anti-Semitism not because I’m a pushover but because I feel it is delusional and, as such, prevents us from identifying the causes of the problems we face.

    Would it be intellectually honest of Mr Frost to acknowledge the superiority of his upbringing and culture? Would it be good for Mr Frost to go back to church and rebuild his culture back to what it was?

    I never left my church. My church left me, as it left many other people like myself.

    I considered joining another church, but all of them are going down the same path. I recently dropped by a “conservative” Protestant church to pick up my wife (she was attending a course there). I noticed numerous newspaper clippings about Muslim refugees on the bulletin board. One of them showed people proudly holding a sign “Let them in!!!”

    On issues of family and sexuality, there are some differences among the churches, but often even those differences are cosmetic. Liberal Christians approve of single motherhood because the struggle for personal autonomy requires it. Conservative Christians approve of single motherhood because the fight against abortion requires it. Liberals create “blended families” through divorce. Conservatives create them through international adoption.

    In my opinion, the Great Replacement is the defining issue of our age. Can anyone here point to one church that has spoken out against the Great Replacement? (preferably one within driving distance)

    What makes Canada different?

    Canada began as an ideological construct. It saw itself as a rampart against American liberalism and as a refuge for those Americans who wished to abandon foolish ideas of individualism, atheism, equality, and so forth.

    This view of ourselves was strengthened during the War of 1812, when the U.S. invaded Canada at a time when British forces were tied down in the war against Napoleon. Nonetheless, the limited numbers of British soldiers and Canadian militiamen not only held their own but even managed to seize large stretches of American territory.

    Through most of the early to mid 19th century, there was an expectation that another war would happen. At the time of the American Civil War, Britain and France made plans to intervene on the side of the South. The South would become an independent state, and parts of the North would be annexed to Canada. In addition, the Mexican Republic would be abolished and turned into a monarchy under French direction.

    That never happened, partly because a large part of the British public was sympathetic to the North, partly because Russia was opposed to the planned intervention, and partly because the North was already becoming a strong military power.

    Ideas live longer than their usefulness. As a rampart against American liberalism, Canada was already obsolete by the late 19th century. Then, gradually, the success of the American experiment began to convince many Canadians that we were wrong and they were right. This was especially true after 1945. Britain was bankrupt, and the U.S. seemed to be the model to follow. The U.S. was succeeding on all fronts: geopolitically, economically, technologically, and so on.

    Anti-Americanism still exists but has been reprogrammed. Americans are reproached for not being sufficiently loyal to their liberal ideals. In a sense, anti-Americanism is an American export. It’s like the student who prides himself on being better than his teacher.

    Will this change? If change does come, it will probably come first in Quebec, where the penetration of liberalism is more recent and often superficial. This is why anti-hate laws tend to be more draconian in Quebec than elsewhere. You don’t need such laws in a society where most people have internalized correct thinking. In the latter case, it’s not the police you have to worry about. It’s your employer, your spouse, and even your children.

    But consider, Ron won’t let Peter censor comments … so how can Peter be responsible for what commenters say?

    Someone has to take responsibility. If the anonymous commenter won’t assume responsibility for his comments, the responsibility falls to the columnist. And if the columnist can’t censor the comments, that’s his problem. He freely agreed to that arrangement.

    •ï¿½Replies: @German_reader
    @Peter Frost

    "Can anyone here point to one church that has spoken out against the Great Replacement? "

    But how could they speak out against it? Christianity's message is universal and colour-blind...there really isn't a way it could be explicitly pro conserving a specific nation or ethnicity. From a Christian point of view aren't such things meaningless and destined for oblivion anyway? And given how increasingly godless most Europeans and European-descended peoples nowadays are, it seems to me Christianity and the European world are finally diverging...Christianity's future is the global south, and the churches are behaving accordingly...why should they care about "racist" white people who mostly aren't fervent believers anymore anyway?
    The only thing that somewhat mystifies me is the excessive Islamophilia displayed by many Christians (odd given Islam's role as Christianity's most effective enemy throughout the ages and the current plight of Mideast Christians), but I suppose it's motivated by resentment against modern secularism and maybe even an hidden admiration for Muslims (who don't have to tolerate troublesome atheists but just chop them up).
    In a way, I'm increasingly disillusioned with Western civilization...maybe it was always a mistake. I certainly don't feel much of a connection with the Christian tradition (and in my badly paid academic job I actually have to work with medieval Christian writings...). But there's no way back to the pre-Christian past either (which in any case isn't desirable in many ways) nor any meaningful alternative...it's a dreadful situation,
    , @Sean
    @Peter Frost


    He freely agreed to that arrangement.
    �
    Yes, even (especially) when it is being presented as a matter of course, never be shepherded (or lulled) into signing off on anything without understanding exactly what you are agreeing to be held to the fire with.
  • @AndrewR
    @Clyde

    Trust me, he does not just censor the "gas the kikes race war now" type comments.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    What else does he censor in your view?

  • “We should note that the tendency to consider individuals, things, objects, and peoples replaceable or interchangeable is fairly widespread and in line with a threefold movement whereby people have become industrialized, deprived of their spirituality, and dumbed down. Call it a later and more generalized stage of Taylorism. At first, we replace only the parts of manufactured goods. Then, we replace workers. Finally, we replace entire peoples.”

    The only good bureaucrat is one with a pistol to his head! Take it away from his head and put it in his hand and there go the Bill of Rights!

    Now we have Lord & Taylorism. It used to be a guy couldn’t figure it out, so he’d go to church, start a revolution and now what’s the salvation? Shopping! The ladies are going to pull down the churches to have the developers throw up Salvation Army style flop houses with state loans in Virginia. Clearly democracy gone cracy with low interest high finance. Everybody is getting a plastic state bread card too and a little ration stamp book. You’ll all be treated to the new free clinic care designed around V.A. health delivery. The finest in the land, which is where they’ll be putting you with less bang and more bureaucracy for your buck and buck you’ll be eating as the deer gets shot you’ll get fed. All your savings will be repurposed to keep the bankrupt corporations and fly circus going to haul suckers to Vegas where the car is the home and the sidewalk is side work. Instead of turning the church into a flop house we can flip the airports and malls. Turn the empty banks in liquor shops with ATM’s. Put the state out of our misery and you and yours. Finally, we replace entire bureaucracies with machines.

  • @Clyde
    @AndrewR


    What? Ron lets Sailer censor comments and he is not shy about it.
    �
    Hmmmmm....never thought about that before but you must be correct. Steve Sailer is an insta-StormFront magnet. He must kick out 10-20 percent _dumb_ass_nazi_ comments depending on what day of the week it is.

    Replies: @AndrewR

    Trust me, he does not just censor the “gas the kikes race war now” type comments.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Anonymous
    @AndrewR

    What else does he censor in your view?
  • @AndrewR
    @Anonymous

    What? Ron lets Sailer censor comments and he is not shy about it. Why not Frost?

    Replies: @Clyde

    What? Ron lets Sailer censor comments and he is not shy about it.

    Hmmmmm….never thought about that before but you must be correct. Steve Sailer is an insta-StormFront magnet. He must kick out 10-20 percent _dumb_ass_nazi_ comments depending on what day of the week it is.

    •ï¿½Replies: @AndrewR
    @Clyde

    Trust me, he does not just censor the "gas the kikes race war now" type comments.

    Replies: @Anonymous
  • Clyde says:
    @random observer
    @Wizard of Oz

    The French Canadians were until the 1960s easily and by a huge margin the most conservative element of Canadian society- rural, agrarian, more Catholic than the Pope, anti-English and anti-semitic in the same breath, you name it. [That last made sense to some degree. Although the political/clerical/and to some extent legal elites were in fact always predominantly French, the business and cultural leaders of a place like Montreal were either Anglo-Saxons or English-speaking Jews].

    To some extent the radical leftist turn of Canadian society since the 1960s has been driven by the collapse of Quebec's lingering old-style French society and its overnight replacement by a modern-style French, hyper-secular, Jacobin-populist society. Suddenly the policies required to placate them became different, the kinds of politicians they elected in Quebec City and Ottawa became very different. And their nationalism ceased to be the former more inward-looking and isolationist kind and became more socialistic and progressive on things like criminal justice and social issues. So the newly demanding effort to integrate them started to emphasize these things as well and to transform wider society.

    One thing though- there was a constituency waiting. Anglo Canadian elites had some characteristics in common with northeastern American elites, particularly the degree to which institutional Protestantism became a progressive and increasingly autosecularizing force in society. The people were, like Americans, not exactly opposed to this worldview at the time.

    Some have said that Canada is more deferential than Australia because the dominant non-English strain was Scottish, where in Australia it was Irish. It's not that the Scots were deferential to power as such [LOL] so much that they had the Presbyterian puritanical streak in them that led to pretentious moralizing. For an American reader, again think something like the trends that turned Massachusetts Congregationalists into Unitarians and Transcendentalists, and then into full-on secular progressives. Whereas the Irish brought to Australia a more 'FU' mentality. [Just as the Scotch Irish did for America].

    There are a lot of limits to this kind of analysis, but it rings true on some levels.

    Then again, I find Australians increasingly ready to lecture the world on progressive matters, it's just at an earlier stage and takes more demotic forms. That actually may make sense. The contemporary Irish are insufferable progressive moralizers, fanning out all over the world to foist this on unsuspecting Africans and Asians.

    Replies: @Wizard of Oz, @Clyde, @Clyde

    Some have said that Canada is more deferential than Australia because the dominant non-English strain was Scottish, where in Australia it was Irish. It’s not that the Scots were deferential to power as such [LOL] so much that they had the Presbyterian puritanical streak in them that led to pretentious moralizing. For an American reader, again think something like the trends that turned Massachusetts Congregationalists into Unitarians and Transcendentalists, and then into full-on secular progressives. Whereas the Irish brought to Australia a more ‘FU’ mentality. [Just as the Scotch Irish did for America].

    Your key words being “pretentious moralizing”. Has there ever been a more pretentious moralizer than Barrack Hussein Obama with his (count ’em) three Muslim names?

  • @Ron Unz
    @Erik Sieven


    Once again I can only say Ron Unz should give you the power to moderate and delete comments so you won’t run the risk of incuring any legal trouble.
    �
    Well, since Peter Frost has periodically been complaining about being unable to moderate his own comments and several commenters here have now raised the same issue, I might as well explain the situation...

    When Frost began publishing his columns here, I gave him moderation privileges over his comments. I soon began receiving numerous complaints from commenters who claimed they had been censored and their comments unfairly deleted. In some cases, that was apparently because they had digressed into especially "touchy" subjects, but in other cases it was because they had attempted to factually dispute some of Frost's claims. I wasn't happy about this, but declined to intervene.

    Then he published a long article that I happened to read and disagree with. I very politely raised some technical objections to his analysis in the comments, and his responses became increasingly angry and insulting. I remained very polite, and merely pointed out why I felt my quantitative arguments were probably correct. Finally, he summarily deleted one of my long, detailed, and very polite comments:

    https://www.unz.com/pfrost/western-europe-state-formation-and-genetic-pacification-3/#comment-thread-896994

    I'm a remarkably easy-going fellow about such things, but I'll be damned if I'm going to allow my own (very polite) comments on technical issues to be censored on my own website.

    I daresay virtually any other website proprietor on the Internet would have summarily terminated a columnist who behaved in such an unreasonable manner. I merely revoked his moderation privileges.

    More recently, I've offered to restore his comment moderation privileges so long as (1) he agrees to avoid deleting my own polite and respectful comments in the future and (2) he agrees to moderate his comments in timely fashion, rather than having a huge number of them accumulate in the "pending" queue, thereby cluttering up the comment system and greatly inconveniencing the moderation of the comments for other columnists.

    He said he couldn't make such promises, since (as I recall) he claimed he might need to consult an attorney about approving many of the individual comments. Under such circumstances, it seemed that the least-bad legal option was for our website to continue moderating his comments, thereby providing him some "deniability" from whatever controversial sentiments they might express.

    I can understand why writers complain about "censorship" and I can also understand why those same individuals nonetheless feel compelled to censor comments that might get them into legal trouble. However, I find it less understandable why they would also censor comments that (very politely) point out their possible factual or quantitative errors.

    Replies: @Honorary Thief, @Dahlia, @Sean, @Sean the Neon Caucasian

    Consult an attorney…? Christ, just cut the goose loose.

  • @random observer
    @Wizard of Oz

    The French Canadians were until the 1960s easily and by a huge margin the most conservative element of Canadian society- rural, agrarian, more Catholic than the Pope, anti-English and anti-semitic in the same breath, you name it. [That last made sense to some degree. Although the political/clerical/and to some extent legal elites were in fact always predominantly French, the business and cultural leaders of a place like Montreal were either Anglo-Saxons or English-speaking Jews].

    To some extent the radical leftist turn of Canadian society since the 1960s has been driven by the collapse of Quebec's lingering old-style French society and its overnight replacement by a modern-style French, hyper-secular, Jacobin-populist society. Suddenly the policies required to placate them became different, the kinds of politicians they elected in Quebec City and Ottawa became very different. And their nationalism ceased to be the former more inward-looking and isolationist kind and became more socialistic and progressive on things like criminal justice and social issues. So the newly demanding effort to integrate them started to emphasize these things as well and to transform wider society.

    One thing though- there was a constituency waiting. Anglo Canadian elites had some characteristics in common with northeastern American elites, particularly the degree to which institutional Protestantism became a progressive and increasingly autosecularizing force in society. The people were, like Americans, not exactly opposed to this worldview at the time.

    Some have said that Canada is more deferential than Australia because the dominant non-English strain was Scottish, where in Australia it was Irish. It's not that the Scots were deferential to power as such [LOL] so much that they had the Presbyterian puritanical streak in them that led to pretentious moralizing. For an American reader, again think something like the trends that turned Massachusetts Congregationalists into Unitarians and Transcendentalists, and then into full-on secular progressives. Whereas the Irish brought to Australia a more 'FU' mentality. [Just as the Scotch Irish did for America].

    There are a lot of limits to this kind of analysis, but it rings true on some levels.

    Then again, I find Australians increasingly ready to lecture the world on progressive matters, it's just at an earlier stage and takes more demotic forms. That actually may make sense. The contemporary Irish are insufferable progressive moralizers, fanning out all over the world to foist this on unsuspecting Africans and Asians.

    Replies: @Wizard of Oz, @Clyde, @Clyde

    A superior post. I read every word. Thanks! I have no time today (Dec 25th) to make a good reply.

  • @DQDF
    @Wizard of Oz

    Unless you are deceitful or blind you would notice that the demographics of Melbourne are almost identical to the demographics of Toronto, teleport between those to places and you would hardly see the difference.

    Replies: @Wizard of Oz

    Did you read what I wrote? What made you think I was saying or implying anything about the demographics of Canada compared with Australia (though Random Observer’s thoughtful reply #66 raised demographic explanations? I was referring to cultural differencescand asking for Peter’s opinion on them.

    Actually I suspect that you would find Toronto to be less Catholic than Melbourne……

  • @DQDF
    @Wizard of Oz

    And again stop with your pathetic Islamic takeover of Canada bullshit, compared to Chinese, Indian, and Filipino immigration inflows to Canada, Muslim immigration inflow is a drop in the bucket. I mean how many people in Muslim clothing do you see in Vancouver anyway?

    Replies: @Wizard of Oz

    Were you really addressing me? Would you care to explain why you thought I had ssid anythibg of substance, or at all, amount Muslim immigration to Canada? Did you read what I had said? Random Observer clearly did. See his reply to me at #66.

  • @random observer
    @Wizard of Oz

    The French Canadians were until the 1960s easily and by a huge margin the most conservative element of Canadian society- rural, agrarian, more Catholic than the Pope, anti-English and anti-semitic in the same breath, you name it. [That last made sense to some degree. Although the political/clerical/and to some extent legal elites were in fact always predominantly French, the business and cultural leaders of a place like Montreal were either Anglo-Saxons or English-speaking Jews].

    To some extent the radical leftist turn of Canadian society since the 1960s has been driven by the collapse of Quebec's lingering old-style French society and its overnight replacement by a modern-style French, hyper-secular, Jacobin-populist society. Suddenly the policies required to placate them became different, the kinds of politicians they elected in Quebec City and Ottawa became very different. And their nationalism ceased to be the former more inward-looking and isolationist kind and became more socialistic and progressive on things like criminal justice and social issues. So the newly demanding effort to integrate them started to emphasize these things as well and to transform wider society.

    One thing though- there was a constituency waiting. Anglo Canadian elites had some characteristics in common with northeastern American elites, particularly the degree to which institutional Protestantism became a progressive and increasingly autosecularizing force in society. The people were, like Americans, not exactly opposed to this worldview at the time.

    Some have said that Canada is more deferential than Australia because the dominant non-English strain was Scottish, where in Australia it was Irish. It's not that the Scots were deferential to power as such [LOL] so much that they had the Presbyterian puritanical streak in them that led to pretentious moralizing. For an American reader, again think something like the trends that turned Massachusetts Congregationalists into Unitarians and Transcendentalists, and then into full-on secular progressives. Whereas the Irish brought to Australia a more 'FU' mentality. [Just as the Scotch Irish did for America].

    There are a lot of limits to this kind of analysis, but it rings true on some levels.

    Then again, I find Australians increasingly ready to lecture the world on progressive matters, it's just at an earlier stage and takes more demotic forms. That actually may make sense. The contemporary Irish are insufferable progressive moralizers, fanning out all over the world to foist this on unsuspecting Africans and Asians.

    Replies: @Wizard of Oz, @Clyde, @Clyde

    Thanks for your thoughtful and well informed reply. You reminded me of those charming female Irish Presidents who exemplify your case about the contemporary Irish moralizing. (Actually I think the Irish may have got into practice for the contemporary version in their old priest ridden days). And I share your view of the regrettable growth of the Australian pretentions as lecturers to the world – almost entirely on the left except for some of the great and good, especially amongst medical scientists who would be embarrassed for example if they had to explain to friends in the Royal Society or American Academy of Science that Australia wasm’t buying the full line on AGW.

  • @Wizard of Oz
    @Peter Frost

    Peter

    I can easily share your disappointment with European politicians who are failing to preserve Europe in any form early 20th century Europeans could love. But tell us about Canada.

    I say that as one who would like to be able to make useful comparisons with Australia where I think we are very lucky, comparatively, in our ethnic composition and its direction. A few per cent of mostly Lebanese Muslims from misguided 1970s policy aside we have done well since serious immigration, after a long period of relatively small numbers of (especially non- British) immigrants resumed after WW2. First WW2 displaced persons and earlier Jewish refugees then Italians and Greeks with potential never exploited at home. Then Vietnam War refugees and now many bright Chinese (including diaspora) and Indians, often starting as students, are doing a good job of making up for modern dysgenic breeding and improving the age structure of the population. There was a time some 25 years ago when the Transport Accident Scheme in my state was derisively termed "TurkCare" (rhyming with WorkCare which was the workplace injuries compensation scheme) when a number of the small Turkish community's drivers had managed to enhance the productivity of their motor vehicles as harvesters of compensation for soft tissue injuries. But our problems are small which helps explain how left Greens who can't ring enough religion out of global warming fasten upon the woes of our tiny number of Aborigines.

    What makes Canada different? I don't think the absence of a few convicts before the 1850s gold rushes and establishment of colonial self-government could explain much. But it is an impression strongly felt by a lot of Australians that there is a strong line in secular piety preached by Canadians. Typical of my memories is a gathering of (mostly) fairly senior judges to hear a distinguished Canadian female judge lecture us all on the reasons why diversity was important on the bench - with little logic that I remember because it really focused on women and depended on women judges thinking differently from male judges. (It would be interesting to know how much of the broadening of the imagination and preconceptions of today's judges has come from absorbing the Zeitgeist and how much from having women - and gays and immigrants - as fellow judges).

    Has the existence of French Canada and its demands altered Canadian sensibilities generally and in a major way? Have the worst examples south of the border sensitised Canadians to evidences of their own perceived imperfections?

    Replies: @random observer, @DQDF, @DQDF

    And again stop with your pathetic Islamic takeover of Canada bullshit, compared to Chinese, Indian, and Filipino immigration inflows to Canada, Muslim immigration inflow is a drop in the bucket. I mean how many people in Muslim clothing do you see in Vancouver anyway?

    •ï¿½Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    @DQDF

    Were you really addressing me? Would you care to explain why you thought I had ssid anythibg of substance, or at all, amount Muslim immigration to Canada? Did you read what I had said? Random Observer clearly did. See his reply to me at #66.
  • @Wizard of Oz
    @Peter Frost

    Peter

    I can easily share your disappointment with European politicians who are failing to preserve Europe in any form early 20th century Europeans could love. But tell us about Canada.

    I say that as one who would like to be able to make useful comparisons with Australia where I think we are very lucky, comparatively, in our ethnic composition and its direction. A few per cent of mostly Lebanese Muslims from misguided 1970s policy aside we have done well since serious immigration, after a long period of relatively small numbers of (especially non- British) immigrants resumed after WW2. First WW2 displaced persons and earlier Jewish refugees then Italians and Greeks with potential never exploited at home. Then Vietnam War refugees and now many bright Chinese (including diaspora) and Indians, often starting as students, are doing a good job of making up for modern dysgenic breeding and improving the age structure of the population. There was a time some 25 years ago when the Transport Accident Scheme in my state was derisively termed "TurkCare" (rhyming with WorkCare which was the workplace injuries compensation scheme) when a number of the small Turkish community's drivers had managed to enhance the productivity of their motor vehicles as harvesters of compensation for soft tissue injuries. But our problems are small which helps explain how left Greens who can't ring enough religion out of global warming fasten upon the woes of our tiny number of Aborigines.

    What makes Canada different? I don't think the absence of a few convicts before the 1850s gold rushes and establishment of colonial self-government could explain much. But it is an impression strongly felt by a lot of Australians that there is a strong line in secular piety preached by Canadians. Typical of my memories is a gathering of (mostly) fairly senior judges to hear a distinguished Canadian female judge lecture us all on the reasons why diversity was important on the bench - with little logic that I remember because it really focused on women and depended on women judges thinking differently from male judges. (It would be interesting to know how much of the broadening of the imagination and preconceptions of today's judges has come from absorbing the Zeitgeist and how much from having women - and gays and immigrants - as fellow judges).

    Has the existence of French Canada and its demands altered Canadian sensibilities generally and in a major way? Have the worst examples south of the border sensitised Canadians to evidences of their own perceived imperfections?

    Replies: @random observer, @DQDF, @DQDF

    Unless you are deceitful or blind you would notice that the demographics of Melbourne are almost identical to the demographics of Toronto, teleport between those to places and you would hardly see the difference.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    @DQDF

    Did you read what I wrote? What made you think I was saying or implying anything about the demographics of Canada compared with Australia (though Random Observer's thoughtful reply #66 raised demographic explanations? I was referring to cultural differencescand asking for Peter's opinion on them.

    Actually I suspect that you would find Toronto to be less Catholic than Melbourne......
  • @Julian
    Have a great Christmas Peter and a safe and enjoyable festive season. I hope that you come back refreshed and ready for a great 2016.

    I can only add my support to those above in urging you to please continue. Your columns are always interesting.

    In terms of legal challenges, I really can't think of anything you've written that would fall foul of that legislation. I do hope that you will continue.

    Best,
    j

    Replies: @EvolutionistX

    Unfortunately, the legal system is rife with foul-play and spurious suits brought solely to harass people into bankruptcy, even though they have done nothing illegal.

  • Merry Christmas, Peter. Do what you need to stay safe, though of course I hope you keep publishing by some means. Let us know if you do.

    Thanks for all of the posts. They’ve been a great read.

  • Please continue writing. I learn so much from you.

  • Peter Frost, I really hope you continue to write this column in the coming year. All the best to you and your loved ones this Christmas season.

  • Have a great Christmas Peter and a safe and enjoyable festive season. I hope that you come back refreshed and ready for a great 2016.

    I can only add my support to those above in urging you to please continue. Your columns are always interesting.

    In terms of legal challenges, I really can’t think of anything you’ve written that would fall foul of that legislation. I do hope that you will continue.

    Best,
    j

    •ï¿½Replies: @EvolutionistX
    @Julian

    Unfortunately, the legal system is rife with foul-play and spurious suits brought solely to harass people into bankruptcy, even though they have done nothing illegal.
  • @CK
    @Peter Frost

    Given the initial response by the current Attorney General to the Massacre in California, the imposition of an American equivalent to bill 59 is not unthinkable. As you say the time to prepare is before the event rather than after.
    Ezra Levant and Kathy Shaidle come to mind. It is also good to remember that stupidities Canada makes into laws travel south because the border is so intellectually porous and become laws in the USA.

    Replies: @ogunsiron

    Re: bad canadian ideas dripping down south
    I used to browse canadian ”progressive” sites like rabble.ca and about 10 years ago I’d often witness canadian lefties chastising their american comrades about the disturbing freedom of speech that americans enjoyed. They’d argue that actually civilized countries curtailed “hate speech” and that they were very proud that in Canada, not all speech was legal. Back then, the american lefties were still into freedom of speech, though. I’d see the american commenters argue that although they hated “bad” speech, they felt that the best way to fight “bad” speech was to “good speech” louder and stronger.

    It’s amazing to me how things have changed.

  • @Romanian
    @Anonymous

    Isn't Ron Unz Jewish himself?

    Replies: @Wizard of Oz, @AndrewR

    Doesn’t stop the Jew supremacists at the ADL from labelling him the next Hitler.

  • @geokat62
    @Honorary Thief


    ... does it make anyone else seethe with rage that this stuff really happens in a country like Canada?
    �
    The Anti-terrorism Act, 2015 (also known as Bill C-51) was introduced and passed by the previous Conservative government of Canada (albeit with the support of the Liberals). Stephen Harper was so pro-Zionist that Bibi Nutn'Yahoo named a bird sanctuary in Israel after the most righteous goy, Stephen.

    We'll see if Justin Trudeau will follow in Harper's footsteps.

    Replies: @Art

    ” Stephen Harper was so pro-Zionist that Bibi Nutn’Yahoo named a bird sanctuary in Israel after the most righteous goy, Stephen. “

    How many millions will Harper get, like the Clintons got from the Jews?

    It pays big time to use your office to help the Jew tribe.

  • @Honorary Thief

    - the Quebec government is waiting to see whether the new federal government will introduce similar legislation. It wants to avoid a situation where a prosecution under a provincial law could be challenged under a federal law, particularly the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

    - the Quebec government, specifically the Quebec Human Rights Commission, wants to make the fight against “Islamophobia†a priority. I don’t know where that puts me.

    - As a rule, human rights commissions go after soft targets, i.e., lone bloggers with no one to defend them. I don’t know where that puts me. If I am prosecuted for what I write, will you come and testify on my behalf? Will you help pay for my legal defense?
    �
    .................does it make anyone else seethe with rage that this stuff really happens in a country like Canada?

    Replies: @geokat62

    … does it make anyone else seethe with rage that this stuff really happens in a country like Canada?

    The Anti-terrorism Act, 2015 (also known as Bill C-51) was introduced and passed by the previous Conservative government of Canada (albeit with the support of the Liberals). Stephen Harper was so pro-Zionist that Bibi Nutn’Yahoo named a bird sanctuary in Israel after the most righteous goy, Stephen.

    We’ll see if Justin Trudeau will follow in Harper’s footsteps.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Art
    @geokat62

    " Stephen Harper was so pro-Zionist that Bibi Nutn’Yahoo named a bird sanctuary in Israel after the most righteous goy, Stephen. "

    How many millions will Harper get, like the Clintons got from the Jews?

    It pays big time to use your office to help the Jew tribe.
  • @random observer
    @Art

    Worth remembering that there is no church in Canada that represents the western Christian heritage of Canada- they have all gone progressive.

    Arguably one might find something of the broader western tradition still among the Catholics, but then as far as the specific Canadian heritage goes that would be inadequate- apart from the French and Irish, Canadian heritage is Protestant. And the Catholics are actually pretty progressive anyway, apart from their unique archetypical bugaboos like birth control and divorce.

    We are stuck with the ghastly Christian Socialism of the United Church and the Presbyterians, or whatever it is the Anglicans are doing now.

    Or one could join one of the modern style evangelical Protestant churches for a bit of robust conservative Christianity, but the flipside is you have to put up with all the silly imported American holy-roller populism. Good or bad, that doesn't look like heritage Canadian Christianity either.

    Also, I don't know about Frost on this score. But I'm 45 and institutional Christianity played no role in developing my 'nice life' in Canada. That was just the place my mother dragged us to be bored by a soporific sermon every week when I was a kid. And gave up eventually.

    Replies: @Art, @Digital Samizdat

    Or one could join one of the modern style evangelical Protestant churches for a bit of robust conservative Christianity, but the flipside is you have to put up with all the silly imported American holy-roller populism.

    I’d pass on that, too.

  • Art says:
    @random observer
    @Art

    Worth remembering that there is no church in Canada that represents the western Christian heritage of Canada- they have all gone progressive.

    Arguably one might find something of the broader western tradition still among the Catholics, but then as far as the specific Canadian heritage goes that would be inadequate- apart from the French and Irish, Canadian heritage is Protestant. And the Catholics are actually pretty progressive anyway, apart from their unique archetypical bugaboos like birth control and divorce.

    We are stuck with the ghastly Christian Socialism of the United Church and the Presbyterians, or whatever it is the Anglicans are doing now.

    Or one could join one of the modern style evangelical Protestant churches for a bit of robust conservative Christianity, but the flipside is you have to put up with all the silly imported American holy-roller populism. Good or bad, that doesn't look like heritage Canadian Christianity either.

    Also, I don't know about Frost on this score. But I'm 45 and institutional Christianity played no role in developing my 'nice life' in Canada. That was just the place my mother dragged us to be bored by a soporific sermon every week when I was a kid. And gave up eventually.

    Replies: @Art, @Digital Samizdat

    But I’m 45 and institutional Christianity played no role in developing my ‘nice life’ in Canada. That was just the place my mother dragged us to be bored by a soporific sermon every week when I was a kid. And gave up eventually.

    Hmm – as you Canadians leave your idealistic Christian churches, your country goes deeper into the toilet. Does one and one make two anymore?

    Could it be that Christian idealism has something of value to say. And the place to get that idealism is in free volitional churches and not in the halls of government.

    Right now the idealistic Christian baby is being thrown out with dirty religious bathwater.

    The volitional community of Christian idealism is of great value to humanity.

    Clearly government force backfires. Look at the sad situation of free speech in Canada. Who is running free speech in Canada – Jews or Christians? If you Canadians want your free speech back you must find your Christian idealism again.

    p.s. Preachers will preach the brand of Christianity that YOU want.

  • @Anonymous
    @AndrewR

    Welcome to the Internet. I guess the argument is that Peter could/should censor what Jews would consider anti-Semitic comments, including any criticism of Israel, or fall under the Canadian "hate crime" statute. (I guess that Peter should also include censoring what Moslems would consider anti-Moslem comments because Arabs are Semitic.)

    But consider, Ron won't let Peter censor comments ... so how can Peter be responsible for what commenters say? Perhaps Ron should be extradited to Canada to face "hate crime" charges for not censoring the comments written by a Canadian that he won't let the Canadian censor. (Sorry, this is getting convoluted ....)

    The next line of the argument: Peter certainly CAN avoid the presence of anti-Jewish and anti-Moslem comments to his articles that he cannot censor by NOT writing the articles in the first place. In other words, "Peter, shut the f*ck up!"

    Sounds like pre-emptory censorship (a.k.a. political repression) to me.

    Replies: @AndrewR

    What? Ron lets Sailer censor comments and he is not shy about it. Why not Frost?

    •ï¿½Replies: @Clyde
    @AndrewR


    What? Ron lets Sailer censor comments and he is not shy about it.
    �
    Hmmmmm....never thought about that before but you must be correct. Steve Sailer is an insta-StormFront magnet. He must kick out 10-20 percent _dumb_ass_nazi_ comments depending on what day of the week it is.

    Replies: @AndrewR
  • @Wizard of Oz
    @Peter Frost

    Peter

    I can easily share your disappointment with European politicians who are failing to preserve Europe in any form early 20th century Europeans could love. But tell us about Canada.

    I say that as one who would like to be able to make useful comparisons with Australia where I think we are very lucky, comparatively, in our ethnic composition and its direction. A few per cent of mostly Lebanese Muslims from misguided 1970s policy aside we have done well since serious immigration, after a long period of relatively small numbers of (especially non- British) immigrants resumed after WW2. First WW2 displaced persons and earlier Jewish refugees then Italians and Greeks with potential never exploited at home. Then Vietnam War refugees and now many bright Chinese (including diaspora) and Indians, often starting as students, are doing a good job of making up for modern dysgenic breeding and improving the age structure of the population. There was a time some 25 years ago when the Transport Accident Scheme in my state was derisively termed "TurkCare" (rhyming with WorkCare which was the workplace injuries compensation scheme) when a number of the small Turkish community's drivers had managed to enhance the productivity of their motor vehicles as harvesters of compensation for soft tissue injuries. But our problems are small which helps explain how left Greens who can't ring enough religion out of global warming fasten upon the woes of our tiny number of Aborigines.

    What makes Canada different? I don't think the absence of a few convicts before the 1850s gold rushes and establishment of colonial self-government could explain much. But it is an impression strongly felt by a lot of Australians that there is a strong line in secular piety preached by Canadians. Typical of my memories is a gathering of (mostly) fairly senior judges to hear a distinguished Canadian female judge lecture us all on the reasons why diversity was important on the bench - with little logic that I remember because it really focused on women and depended on women judges thinking differently from male judges. (It would be interesting to know how much of the broadening of the imagination and preconceptions of today's judges has come from absorbing the Zeitgeist and how much from having women - and gays and immigrants - as fellow judges).

    Has the existence of French Canada and its demands altered Canadian sensibilities generally and in a major way? Have the worst examples south of the border sensitised Canadians to evidences of their own perceived imperfections?

    Replies: @random observer, @DQDF, @DQDF

    The French Canadians were until the 1960s easily and by a huge margin the most conservative element of Canadian society- rural, agrarian, more Catholic than the Pope, anti-English and anti-semitic in the same breath, you name it. [That last made sense to some degree. Although the political/clerical/and to some extent legal elites were in fact always predominantly French, the business and cultural leaders of a place like Montreal were either Anglo-Saxons or English-speaking Jews].

    To some extent the radical leftist turn of Canadian society since the 1960s has been driven by the collapse of Quebec’s lingering old-style French society and its overnight replacement by a modern-style French, hyper-secular, Jacobin-populist society. Suddenly the policies required to placate them became different, the kinds of politicians they elected in Quebec City and Ottawa became very different. And their nationalism ceased to be the former more inward-looking and isolationist kind and became more socialistic and progressive on things like criminal justice and social issues. So the newly demanding effort to integrate them started to emphasize these things as well and to transform wider society.

    One thing though- there was a constituency waiting. Anglo Canadian elites had some characteristics in common with northeastern American elites, particularly the degree to which institutional Protestantism became a progressive and increasingly autosecularizing force in society. The people were, like Americans, not exactly opposed to this worldview at the time.

    Some have said that Canada is more deferential than Australia because the dominant non-English strain was Scottish, where in Australia it was Irish. It’s not that the Scots were deferential to power as such [LOL] so much that they had the Presbyterian puritanical streak in them that led to pretentious moralizing. For an American reader, again think something like the trends that turned Massachusetts Congregationalists into Unitarians and Transcendentalists, and then into full-on secular progressives. Whereas the Irish brought to Australia a more ‘FU’ mentality. [Just as the Scotch Irish did for America].

    There are a lot of limits to this kind of analysis, but it rings true on some levels.

    Then again, I find Australians increasingly ready to lecture the world on progressive matters, it’s just at an earlier stage and takes more demotic forms. That actually may make sense. The contemporary Irish are insufferable progressive moralizers, fanning out all over the world to foist this on unsuspecting Africans and Asians.

    •ï¿½Agree: Wizard of Oz
    •ï¿½Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    @random observer

    Thanks for your thoughtful and well informed reply. You reminded me of those charming female Irish Presidents who exemplify your case about the contemporary Irish moralizing. (Actually I think the Irish may have got into practice for the contemporary version in their old priest ridden days). And I share your view of the regrettable growth of the Australian pretentions as lecturers to the world - almost entirely on the left except for some of the great and good, especially amongst medical scientists who would be embarrassed for example if they had to explain to friends in the Royal Society or American Academy of Science that Australia wasm't buying the full line on AGW.
    , @Clyde
    @random observer

    A superior post. I read every word. Thanks! I have no time today (Dec 25th) to make a good reply.
    , @Clyde
    @random observer


    Some have said that Canada is more deferential than Australia because the dominant non-English strain was Scottish, where in Australia it was Irish. It’s not that the Scots were deferential to power as such [LOL] so much that they had the Presbyterian puritanical streak in them that led to pretentious moralizing. For an American reader, again think something like the trends that turned Massachusetts Congregationalists into Unitarians and Transcendentalists, and then into full-on secular progressives. Whereas the Irish brought to Australia a more ‘FU’ mentality. [Just as the Scotch Irish did for America].
    �
    Your key words being "pretentious moralizing". Has there ever been a more pretentious moralizer than Barrack Hussein Obama with his (count 'em) three Muslim names?
  • @Art
    @Art


    Republican donor Adelson and Trump may be aligning on Israel

    MACAU (Reuters) - Top Republican Party donor Sheldon Adelson said on Friday he met presidential candidate Donald Trump earlier this week and that the two American billionaires broached the issue at the heart of Adelson's political agenda: support for Israel.

    On the subject of Israel, Trump added, "Sheldon knows that nobody will be more loyal to Israel than Donald Trump."
    �
    And Trump loves the Mexicans, and he going to get every last black vote. Hmm.

    Me thinks that this meeting is shot across Trump's bow – telling him “the Jew are watching you.â€

    p.s. I would not volunteer for Trump's Secret Service detail.

    https://ca.news.yahoo.com/republican-donor-adelson-trump-may-aligning-israel-003125447--finance.html

    Replies: @geokat62

    p.s. I would not volunteer for Trump’s Secret Service detail.

    I “tried” making the same point in the following comment to Rurik:

    Ignore the “agree.†I mistakenly thought the picture you were referring to was Giraldi’s JFK picture.

  • @Art

    Peter Frost: This will be my last column for 2015, and I wish all of you a very Merry Christmas! Although I no longer go to church, I still consider Christmas to be a very important time of year when we can spend more time with our loved ones and enjoy the traditions of this mid-winter celebration.
    �
    May I make a point.

    Mr Frost is an intellectual. He is too intellectually superior to go to Christian church. He has abandoned the thing that created his nice life. What philosophy created his country, what philosophy created his intellectual world, what philosophy created his home life and his community life as a child? Wasn't it the long flow of thoughts and ideals that he received in his Christian church. Thoughts that he heard, his parents heard, and their parents heard was a continuum of progress. Among what they all heard is the ideal of free speech.

    In his country Canada – free speech has been curtailed by people who learned differently from what Mr Frost learned (Jew people). Their religion now controls his country and his free speech. Clearly these Jew people are taking his country backwards.

    Would it be intellectually honest of Mr Frost to acknowledge the superiority of his upbringing and culture? Would it be good for Mr Frost to go back to church and rebuild his culture back to what it was?

    Replies: @random observer

    Worth remembering that there is no church in Canada that represents the western Christian heritage of Canada- they have all gone progressive.

    Arguably one might find something of the broader western tradition still among the Catholics, but then as far as the specific Canadian heritage goes that would be inadequate- apart from the French and Irish, Canadian heritage is Protestant. And the Catholics are actually pretty progressive anyway, apart from their unique archetypical bugaboos like birth control and divorce.

    We are stuck with the ghastly Christian Socialism of the United Church and the Presbyterians, or whatever it is the Anglicans are doing now.

    Or one could join one of the modern style evangelical Protestant churches for a bit of robust conservative Christianity, but the flipside is you have to put up with all the silly imported American holy-roller populism. Good or bad, that doesn’t look like heritage Canadian Christianity either.

    Also, I don’t know about Frost on this score. But I’m 45 and institutional Christianity played no role in developing my ‘nice life’ in Canada. That was just the place my mother dragged us to be bored by a soporific sermon every week when I was a kid. And gave up eventually.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Art
    @random observer


    But I’m 45 and institutional Christianity played no role in developing my ‘nice life’ in Canada. That was just the place my mother dragged us to be bored by a soporific sermon every week when I was a kid. And gave up eventually.
    �
    Hmm – as you Canadians leave your idealistic Christian churches, your country goes deeper into the toilet. Does one and one make two anymore?

    Could it be that Christian idealism has something of value to say. And the place to get that idealism is in free volitional churches and not in the halls of government.

    Right now the idealistic Christian baby is being thrown out with dirty religious bathwater.

    The volitional community of Christian idealism is of great value to humanity.

    Clearly government force backfires. Look at the sad situation of free speech in Canada. Who is running free speech in Canada – Jews or Christians? If you Canadians want your free speech back you must find your Christian idealism again.

    p.s. Preachers will preach the brand of Christianity that YOU want.
    , @Digital Samizdat
    @random observer


    Or one could join one of the modern style evangelical Protestant churches for a bit of robust conservative Christianity, but the flipside is you have to put up with all the silly imported American holy-roller populism.
    �
    I'd pass on that, too.
  • Anonymous •ï¿½Disclaimer says:
    @AndrewR
    @German_reader

    How could he get in trouble for what non-him commenters say on a website owned by another person based in another country?

    Replies: @Anonymous

    Welcome to the Internet. I guess the argument is that Peter could/should censor what Jews would consider anti-Semitic comments, including any criticism of Israel, or fall under the Canadian “hate crime” statute. (I guess that Peter should also include censoring what Moslems would consider anti-Moslem comments because Arabs are Semitic.)

    But consider, Ron won’t let Peter censor comments … so how can Peter be responsible for what commenters say? Perhaps Ron should be extradited to Canada to face “hate crime” charges for not censoring the comments written by a Canadian that he won’t let the Canadian censor. (Sorry, this is getting convoluted ….)

    The next line of the argument: Peter certainly CAN avoid the presence of anti-Jewish and anti-Moslem comments to his articles that he cannot censor by NOT writing the articles in the first place. In other words, “Peter, shut the f*ck up!”

    Sounds like pre-emptory censorship (a.k.a. political repression) to me.

    •ï¿½Replies: @AndrewR
    @Anonymous

    What? Ron lets Sailer censor comments and he is not shy about it. Why not Frost?

    Replies: @Clyde
  • @Rehmat
    @Hitler

    Neyth Nethanyahu - When was the last time you opened the Holy Talmud? Israeli historian Israel Shahak called it the most hate religious literature in the world. It curses Jesus, Mary and Christians. Holy Qur'an on the other hand, raises Jesus and Mary to the level of prophet Moses and his mother.

    If Hitler loved Muslims, how come he never higher a single Muslim in his administration, which was loaded with Christians and Jews.

    Nazi army had 150,000 German Jews but not a single Muslim.

    In October 2015, Netanyahu told the 37th World Zionist Congress that Adolf Hitler only wanted to expel the German Jews, but he was advised by Palestinian Mufti al-Haj Amin al-Husseini (d. 1974 in Lebanon) to exterminate the Jews.....

    http://rehmat1.com/2015/10/22/netanyahu-absolves-hitler-of-holocaust/

    Replies: @This Is Our Home, @random observer, @RadicalCenter

    His ‘administration’ was ‘loaded’ with Jews? That must have been the greatest and most perilous work of ‘passing’ in world history.

    The army, perhaps, but then an army operating on that scale sometimes has to turn a blind eye to things to maximize cannon fodder. 150,000 such passing for certifiable Aryans would not actually be that huge a figure for an armed force that pushed 10 million.

    Perhaps the absence of Muslims in Reich ‘administration’ could be put down to the absence of Muslims among the German people. Apart from the occasional eccentric, how many Muslim ‘Germans’ were there in 1939?

    On the other hand the army and SS made considerable use of Muslims where they could find any in Europe or in Russia. There was even a Bosnian SS unit. Then again, by mid-war the SS would take anyone.

  • @German_reader
    I have to say I'm feeling rather depressed right now about the way things are going. Here in Germany the AfD seems to be riven by infighting. One of their more outspokenly nationalist politicians, Björn Höcke (leader of the AfD in Thuringia), is now under fire for a lecture at a right-wing think tank in which he (for about two minutes out of fifty) spoke about Africa's demographic expansion and the threat it presented to Europe. Maybe somewhat foolishly he claimed this was a consequence of evolution, of r- and k-strategies for reproduction (I suppose he got that from Philipp Rushton). Of course he was charged immediately with "racism", and unfortunately the rest of the AfD seems to be willing to consider him persona non grata for that (though that may only be a pretext, there's been a simmering power struggle for some time between different factions, and Höcke himself isn't blameless). But of course he's absolutely right about the main point: If things continue as they are now, Europe will be overwhelmed by masses of "refugees" from parts of the Islamic world and from sub-Saharan Africa.
    The last few months have been a revelation for me, in a bad way. It's disheartening how most people, even and especially "conservatives", seem to have thoroughly internalized the "anti-racist" narrative. Criticism of Islam is just barely possible, anything even vaguely nationalistic doesn't get a mention at all in official discourse. I don't understand how people can be that idiotic not to understand how current trends will end.
    Anyway, I would be sad if you stopped writing your column here. Once again I can only say Ron Unz should give you the power to moderate and delete comments so you won't run the risk of incuring any legal trouble.

    Replies: @Erik Sieven, @AndrewR

    How could he get in trouble for what non-him commenters say on a website owned by another person based in another country?

    •ï¿½Replies: @Anonymous
    @AndrewR

    Welcome to the Internet. I guess the argument is that Peter could/should censor what Jews would consider anti-Semitic comments, including any criticism of Israel, or fall under the Canadian "hate crime" statute. (I guess that Peter should also include censoring what Moslems would consider anti-Moslem comments because Arabs are Semitic.)

    But consider, Ron won't let Peter censor comments ... so how can Peter be responsible for what commenters say? Perhaps Ron should be extradited to Canada to face "hate crime" charges for not censoring the comments written by a Canadian that he won't let the Canadian censor. (Sorry, this is getting convoluted ....)

    The next line of the argument: Peter certainly CAN avoid the presence of anti-Jewish and anti-Moslem comments to his articles that he cannot censor by NOT writing the articles in the first place. In other words, "Peter, shut the f*ck up!"

    Sounds like pre-emptory censorship (a.k.a. political repression) to me.

    Replies: @AndrewR
  • Art says:
    @Art
    @geokat62

    Trump and Israel?

    First Trump says he loves everyone - Mexicans, blacks, and Jews. Maybe it is true.

    Trump knows Jews – one can not function as he has in NYC, and not know Jews. I think that there is an earned respect both ways.

    I trust the Jews to know Jew business. Just looking at the Jew controlled media - it is clear that the Jews have a real fear of him. He is too powerful a personality – he does not totally fear them.

    I think that he will assure Israel's safety – but will not give them the family jewels when they demand them. I think that the Jews will not want for him to get his back up against them and go public about their demands. All it would take is for Trump to speak out as President and the whole Zionist Jew game is over. The last thing the Jew want is a public fight over them. (Actually more and more Jews and Gentiles are turning against Zionism.)

    So with Trump as president there will be no more standing-o Mufti Netanyahu speeches before all of congress.

    Sounds not to bad. Elect him!

    Replies: @Art

    Republican donor Adelson and Trump may be aligning on Israel

    MACAU (Reuters) – Top Republican Party donor Sheldon Adelson said on Friday he met presidential candidate Donald Trump earlier this week and that the two American billionaires broached the issue at the heart of Adelson’s political agenda: support for Israel.

    On the subject of Israel, Trump added, “Sheldon knows that nobody will be more loyal to Israel than Donald Trump.”

    And Trump loves the Mexicans, and he going to get every last black vote. Hmm.

    Me thinks that this meeting is shot across Trump’s bow – telling him “the Jew are watching you.â€

    p.s. I would not volunteer for Trump’s Secret Service detail.

    https://ca.news.yahoo.com/republican-donor-adelson-trump-may-aligning-israel-003125447--finance.html

    •ï¿½Replies: @geokat62
    @Art


    p.s. I would not volunteer for Trump’s Secret Service detail.
    �
    I "tried" making the same point in the following comment to Rurik:

    Ignore the “agree.†I mistakenly thought the picture you were referring to was Giraldi’s JFK picture.
    �
  • Sean says:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-29951222 In boardrooms, banks and governments the belief has taken root that the advance of capitalism is irreversible. The market-based system that developed in the West has spread to nearly every country in the world. Central economic planning of the sort that existed in the former Soviet Union and Mao’s China no longer exists as a separate economic system. An outpost may linger on in North Korea, but there is really only one kind of economy left in the world. […]
    Equally, there’s no reason to suppose capitalism is going to resume its advance. To my mind the most likely upshot is that the future will be like the past, with the world containing a variety of economic systems. Whatever happens, it won’t be determined by some imaginary process of social evolution. It will be human decisions, interacting with the uncontrollable flow of events, which lead the world into an unknown future.

    https://www.timeshighereducation.com/books/europe-the-struggle-for-supremacy-1453-to-the-present-by-brendan-simms/2004835.article

    Through all the cycles of the rise and fall of a dominant power – 16th-century Spain, France under Louis XIV or Napoleon, or the Kaiser’s Germany – Simms shows how both winners and losers were preoccupied, more or less effectively, with enhancing their economic capacity and administrative efficiency in order to withstand external pressure, or to exert it. Sometimes the domestic changes were revolutionary: both the English Civil War of the 1640s and the “Glorious Revolution†of 1688 had their roots in a perceived need for an English ruler willing to resist the rising power of France. Simms even argues, plausibly, that Britain’s repeal of the Corn Laws in 1846 was motivated largely by Richard Cobden’s “foreign policy†aim of making states more interdependent and thus less prone to conflict.

    I do not know that nation states have such an essential purpose for the political class any longer. They seem to be harking back to Cobden’s ideas. The old function of nation states was simply survival, which meant the support of the common people (who might be called on to fight and die in wars) was required. Post cold war the West is secure against external rival state threats and nuclear weapons have made conventional war against a great power doubly unlikely. The opposition of the people has become irrelevant. Yet we still hear talk of how the population must increase to keep the country important internationally and strong in relation to other supposedly friendly countries. The Economist at the beginning of the year was gloating about Britain’s population exceeding Germany’s in the future. It is a strangely inconsistent thinking to be globalist but still worried about national influence and potential power against supposedly friendly countries. The globalist business elite could be made to alter course if there was a geopolitical threat, because the national governments will act for national cohesion not diversity in circumstances where their state is in real peril.

    I think there will be a very slow build up of a nationalist feeling, although it will seem ineffectual in political terms in the medium term.. If the mercantile-globalist economic strategy ever falls it will be as the result of a slow ideological transformation without apparent effect for decades, but with a international crisis leading to a sudden ethnic nationalist landslide. All this, if it comes to pass, will take about a generation and I think Western countries will have a third of those under 30 wholly or part non European by that time.

    On the other hand, there seems to have been a considerable exaggeration of Western peoples’ non materialistic inclination to sacrifice for the group, and when they do have the inclination the ability to organise to be effective against the well funded and self righteous displacement lobby. I think internal disquiet will be kept under control unless there is some external threat that requires the people to be listened to by the state elite. By the time nationalist parties are on the verge of coming to power, the migrants will be too numerous for any easy resolution and the immigration limiting policies will be seen as a recipe for turmoil, which they probably will be. Again, only a dire state crisis from a rival state will get both people and government to accept that diversity makes a nation state weaker.

  • @Peter Frost
    Björn Höcke (leader of the AfD in Thuringia), is now under fire for a lecture at a right-wing think tank in which he (for about two minutes out of fifty) spoke about Africa’s demographic expansion and the threat it presented to Europe.

    I agree. Throughout most of the world, fertility rates have declined or are declining to replacement level and even lower. There are two big exceptions: sub-Saharan Africa and the Islamist core region of Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Even more worrisome, fertility rates are actually rising in some African countries, like Somalia.

    Even if fertility rates end up falling in those two regions, a lot of momentum is built into their population growth. What we are seeing now is only the beginning. In twenty years time, people will look back at us and wonder how we could have been so blind.

    More the opposite imo – they display extremely strong will towards eradicating their native populations by any means necessary.

    People can be malicious while thinking they are "good." How was it possible that so many good people condoned the burning of witches? Well, witch burning used to be the right thing to do. We see the same perversion of morality today. Once a person or policy is labeled as "racist," the proper moral response is to distance yourself from that person or policy.

    There is no painless way of dismantling that sort of moral consensus. People have to defy it openly, calmly, and in large numbers. Only then will the consensus be shattered.

    In some cases, that was apparently because they had digressed into especially “touchy†subjects, but in other cases it was because they had attempted to factually dispute some of Frost’s claims. I wasn’t happy about this, but declined to intervene.

    Ron,

    Given that you publicly stated your unhappiness, I began deleting fewer comments. Whenever I found a comment offensive , I would go through it to remove offensive content ("niggers," "homos," "Zionist cabal," etc.).

    I don't remember deleting any comments that challenged anything I wrote. I remember deleting MANY off-topic comments about Jews, Jews, Jews. Regardless of the original topic, someone would start talking about Jews, and then other commenters would pile in. Before long the discussion would be only about Jews.

    I remember deleting a sensible comment about Jewish ownership of Sweden's media (via the Bonnier family), and I remember you telling me how unfair that was of me. I suppose I could have pointed out that the Bonniers are no more Jewish than I am a Freemason. I could have also pointed out that the State-owned media in Sweden is even more pro-immigration than the Bonnier-owned media.

    But Jews weren't the topic of discussion, and I didn't want to have yet another column become a discussion about Jews.

    I very politely raised some technical objections to his analysis in the comments, and his responses became increasingly angry and insulting. I remained very polite, and merely pointed out why I felt my quantitative arguments were probably correct.

    We all feel we are polite, sensible, and correct. Above all, correct. The other person is always wrong. Always. That mindset is a common human failing, and I'm not saying you're any worse than me.

    The heat of debate began to rise when you described my position as "extreme" in relation to yours. If I am extreme in relation to The Unz Review, I must be in Stormfront territory. That is how most people would process your remark.

    The debate went off the rails when you argued that the U.S. homicide rate underwent the same rate of decline between 1850 and 1950 that Western Europe had undergone between 1500 and 1750. I replied that the U.S. homicide decline is explained by the aging of the American population. There were proportionately fewer young men in 1950 than there were in 1850. I also pointed out that the U.S. homicide rate rose after 1950, partly because there were far more young men, especially in the African American community.

    Instead of challenging my reply, you simply repeated the same argument over and over, as if I had not replied to it. That's what made me angry. Unlike some people, I'm willing to admit that I can get angry.

    Finally, he summarily deleted one of my long, detailed, and very polite comments

    I closed the comments section to everyone. I felt that the anger level was getting out of hand, and that it was best to let everyone cool off, including myself and yourself.

    He said he couldn’t make such promises, since (as I recall) he claimed he might need to consult an attorney about approving many of the individual comments.

    I wanted to get a legal opinion on Bill 59. The information I have is as follows:

    - the Quebec government is waiting to see whether the new federal government will introduce similar legislation. It wants to avoid a situation where a prosecution under a provincial law could be challenged under a federal law, particularly the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

    - the Quebec government, specifically the Quebec Human Rights Commission, wants to make the fight against "Islamophobia" a priority. I don't know where that puts me.

    - As a rule, human rights commissions go after soft targets, i.e., lone bloggers with no one to defend them. I don't know where that puts me. If I am prosecuted for what I write, will you come and testify on my behalf? Will you help pay for my legal defense?

    This is the sort of problem that doesn't matter ... until it does. The time for making plans is now, not later.

    I can understand why writers complain about “censorship†and I can also understand why those same individuals nonetheless feel compelled to censor comments that might get them into legal trouble.

    In Canada, as in many other countries, the comment section of a column is considered to be an extension of the column. Even if I have no comment control, I can be still held liable for the comments, since I freely and willingly agreed to a situation where I have no control over the comments.

    It's like a man who transfers ownership of his assets to his wife, so that the government can't seize them for unpaid taxes. In that situation, the government will argue that the transfer of ownership was a subterfuge.

    Replies: @CK, @Jim, @Wizard of Oz

    Peter

    I can easily share your disappointment with European politicians who are failing to preserve Europe in any form early 20th century Europeans could love. But tell us about Canada.

    I say that as one who would like to be able to make useful comparisons with Australia where I think we are very lucky, comparatively, in our ethnic composition and its direction. A few per cent of mostly Lebanese Muslims from misguided 1970s policy aside we have done well since serious immigration, after a long period of relatively small numbers of (especially non- British) immigrants resumed after WW2. First WW2 displaced persons and earlier Jewish refugees then Italians and Greeks with potential never exploited at home. Then Vietnam War refugees and now many bright Chinese (including diaspora) and Indians, often starting as students, are doing a good job of making up for modern dysgenic breeding and improving the age structure of the population. There was a time some 25 years ago when the Transport Accident Scheme in my state was derisively termed “TurkCare” (rhyming with WorkCare which was the workplace injuries compensation scheme) when a number of the small Turkish community’s drivers had managed to enhance the productivity of their motor vehicles as harvesters of compensation for soft tissue injuries. But our problems are small which helps explain how left Greens who can’t ring enough religion out of global warming fasten upon the woes of our tiny number of Aborigines.

    What makes Canada different? I don’t think the absence of a few convicts before the 1850s gold rushes and establishment of colonial self-government could explain much. But it is an impression strongly felt by a lot of Australians that there is a strong line in secular piety preached by Canadians. Typical of my memories is a gathering of (mostly) fairly senior judges to hear a distinguished Canadian female judge lecture us all on the reasons why diversity was important on the bench – with little logic that I remember because it really focused on women and depended on women judges thinking differently from male judges. (It would be interesting to know how much of the broadening of the imagination and preconceptions of today’s judges has come from absorbing the Zeitgeist and how much from having women – and gays and immigrants – as fellow judges).

    Has the existence of French Canada and its demands altered Canadian sensibilities generally and in a major way? Have the worst examples south of the border sensitised Canadians to evidences of their own perceived imperfections?

    •ï¿½Replies: @random observer
    @Wizard of Oz

    The French Canadians were until the 1960s easily and by a huge margin the most conservative element of Canadian society- rural, agrarian, more Catholic than the Pope, anti-English and anti-semitic in the same breath, you name it. [That last made sense to some degree. Although the political/clerical/and to some extent legal elites were in fact always predominantly French, the business and cultural leaders of a place like Montreal were either Anglo-Saxons or English-speaking Jews].

    To some extent the radical leftist turn of Canadian society since the 1960s has been driven by the collapse of Quebec's lingering old-style French society and its overnight replacement by a modern-style French, hyper-secular, Jacobin-populist society. Suddenly the policies required to placate them became different, the kinds of politicians they elected in Quebec City and Ottawa became very different. And their nationalism ceased to be the former more inward-looking and isolationist kind and became more socialistic and progressive on things like criminal justice and social issues. So the newly demanding effort to integrate them started to emphasize these things as well and to transform wider society.

    One thing though- there was a constituency waiting. Anglo Canadian elites had some characteristics in common with northeastern American elites, particularly the degree to which institutional Protestantism became a progressive and increasingly autosecularizing force in society. The people were, like Americans, not exactly opposed to this worldview at the time.

    Some have said that Canada is more deferential than Australia because the dominant non-English strain was Scottish, where in Australia it was Irish. It's not that the Scots were deferential to power as such [LOL] so much that they had the Presbyterian puritanical streak in them that led to pretentious moralizing. For an American reader, again think something like the trends that turned Massachusetts Congregationalists into Unitarians and Transcendentalists, and then into full-on secular progressives. Whereas the Irish brought to Australia a more 'FU' mentality. [Just as the Scotch Irish did for America].

    There are a lot of limits to this kind of analysis, but it rings true on some levels.

    Then again, I find Australians increasingly ready to lecture the world on progressive matters, it's just at an earlier stage and takes more demotic forms. That actually may make sense. The contemporary Irish are insufferable progressive moralizers, fanning out all over the world to foist this on unsuspecting Africans and Asians.

    Replies: @Wizard of Oz, @Clyde, @Clyde
    , @DQDF
    @Wizard of Oz

    Unless you are deceitful or blind you would notice that the demographics of Melbourne are almost identical to the demographics of Toronto, teleport between those to places and you would hardly see the difference.

    Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    , @DQDF
    @Wizard of Oz

    And again stop with your pathetic Islamic takeover of Canada bullshit, compared to Chinese, Indian, and Filipino immigration inflows to Canada, Muslim immigration inflow is a drop in the bucket. I mean how many people in Muslim clothing do you see in Vancouver anyway?

    Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  • Art says:

    Peter Frost: This will be my last column for 2015, and I wish all of you a very Merry Christmas! Although I no longer go to church, I still consider Christmas to be a very important time of year when we can spend more time with our loved ones and enjoy the traditions of this mid-winter celebration.

    May I make a point.

    Mr Frost is an intellectual. He is too intellectually superior to go to Christian church. He has abandoned the thing that created his nice life. What philosophy created his country, what philosophy created his intellectual world, what philosophy created his home life and his community life as a child? Wasn’t it the long flow of thoughts and ideals that he received in his Christian church. Thoughts that he heard, his parents heard, and their parents heard was a continuum of progress. Among what they all heard is the ideal of free speech.

    In his country Canada – free speech has been curtailed by people who learned differently from what Mr Frost learned (Jew people). Their religion now controls his country and his free speech. Clearly these Jew people are taking his country backwards.

    Would it be intellectually honest of Mr Frost to acknowledge the superiority of his upbringing and culture? Would it be good for Mr Frost to go back to church and rebuild his culture back to what it was?

    •ï¿½Replies: @random observer
    @Art

    Worth remembering that there is no church in Canada that represents the western Christian heritage of Canada- they have all gone progressive.

    Arguably one might find something of the broader western tradition still among the Catholics, but then as far as the specific Canadian heritage goes that would be inadequate- apart from the French and Irish, Canadian heritage is Protestant. And the Catholics are actually pretty progressive anyway, apart from their unique archetypical bugaboos like birth control and divorce.

    We are stuck with the ghastly Christian Socialism of the United Church and the Presbyterians, or whatever it is the Anglicans are doing now.

    Or one could join one of the modern style evangelical Protestant churches for a bit of robust conservative Christianity, but the flipside is you have to put up with all the silly imported American holy-roller populism. Good or bad, that doesn't look like heritage Canadian Christianity either.

    Also, I don't know about Frost on this score. But I'm 45 and institutional Christianity played no role in developing my 'nice life' in Canada. That was just the place my mother dragged us to be bored by a soporific sermon every week when I was a kid. And gave up eventually.

    Replies: @Art, @Digital Samizdat
  • @Romanian
    @Anonymous

    Isn't Ron Unz Jewish himself?

    Replies: @Wizard of Oz, @AndrewR

    Yes.

  • Art says:
    @geokat62
    @Art


    Elect him.
    �
    Hi, Art. Not sure if you've seen my most recent comment on another thread:

    Thanks for sharing the link, schmenz.

    Sam, remember your comment about a strong POTUS and that Trump represented the only hope to stand up to AIPAC? Interested in getting your comments on the following:

    On the subject of Israel, Trump added, “Sheldon knows that nobody will be more loyal to Israel than Donald Trump.â€

    [Trump's] also the only Republican candidate with Jewish grandkids: his daughter, Ivanka, became Orthodox after marrying real estate scion Jared Kushner. The family keeps kosher, observes the Sabbath and attends the upscale synagogue Congregation Kehilath Jeshurun.

    http://news.yahoo.com/republican-donor-adelson-trump-may-aligning-israel-003125447--finance.html
    �

    Replies: @Art

    Trump and Israel?

    First Trump says he loves everyone – Mexicans, blacks, and Jews. Maybe it is true.

    Trump knows Jews – one can not function as he has in NYC, and not know Jews. I think that there is an earned respect both ways.

    I trust the Jews to know Jew business. Just looking at the Jew controlled media – it is clear that the Jews have a real fear of him. He is too powerful a personality – he does not totally fear them.

    I think that he will assure Israel’s safety – but will not give them the family jewels when they demand them. I think that the Jews will not want for him to get his back up against them and go public about their demands. All it would take is for Trump to speak out as President and the whole Zionist Jew game is over. The last thing the Jew want is a public fight over them. (Actually more and more Jews and Gentiles are turning against Zionism.)

    So with Trump as president there will be no more standing-o Mufti Netanyahu speeches before all of congress.

    Sounds not to bad. Elect him!

    •ï¿½Replies: @Art
    @Art


    Republican donor Adelson and Trump may be aligning on Israel

    MACAU (Reuters) - Top Republican Party donor Sheldon Adelson said on Friday he met presidential candidate Donald Trump earlier this week and that the two American billionaires broached the issue at the heart of Adelson's political agenda: support for Israel.

    On the subject of Israel, Trump added, "Sheldon knows that nobody will be more loyal to Israel than Donald Trump."
    �
    And Trump loves the Mexicans, and he going to get every last black vote. Hmm.

    Me thinks that this meeting is shot across Trump's bow – telling him “the Jew are watching you.â€

    p.s. I would not volunteer for Trump's Secret Service detail.

    https://ca.news.yahoo.com/republican-donor-adelson-trump-may-aligning-israel-003125447--finance.html

    Replies: @geokat62
  • If you looked like this, you might have an interest in keeping the rapists out of France.

    Marion Maréchal-Le Pen

  • @Bill Jones
    @Priss Factor

    The current globalism being practiced on the West is merely what has been perpetrated on the rest of the world since WWII.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    Globalism has been going on for 500 years now. Why do you think Jamaicans are black, and not Arawak and Taino Indians? It’s just now the Indians are native Westerners.

  • @Stephen R. Diamond
    @Cagey Beast

    Censoring anti-Semitic comments avoids confronting the phenomena that white nationalism is highly attractive to anti-Semites. That it's embarrassing is no good reason to hide this fact.

    Moreover, to ban discussion of Jews is to condemn oneself to militant stupidity and enforced ignorance. Jewish influence is highly significant politically: it is a major vector in Middle East politics, and Jews (racial or religious) Jews make up maybe a third of the billionairiate.

    The discussion decidedly suffers from neglecting the clannishness of the Jewish quasi-race, which amplifies the dominance they can obtain from their intellects. But this translates into the Jewish members of the ruling class acting as a kind of vanguard of the transnational bourgeoisie, and as such, this vanguard on the whole embodies their united interests.

    Replies: @NoseytheDuke

    Agree. I don’t even know what Jewish means, I think it means different things to different people including those claiming to be Jews themselves. Not being a “Dead-Sea Pedestrian” (credit the Pythons) myself, I ask myself, Is the general policy of modern Israel good for Jews in general? I think not. Jewish everything everywhere is undermined and tarnished, including tradition and culture by acts of inhumanity such as we’ve seen. True Jewishness is better than that. Even Einstein said that the future of world jewry would depend on how they resolved the Palestinian question. More people called him smart than they have me.

    There are good and bad amongst all people and to be sure there appears to exist vast conspiracies to destroy Nations, economies, races and cultures then brutally restructure humanity according to some evil Machiavellian scheme.How these overlap and who is at he centre of the web(s) I have no clue.

    I think such people would only view religion as a tool to exploit and would have their own epistemology rooted in harsh reality as in nature. Is it possible that it is ultimately tribal and genetic and such people may or may not have DNA linking them to the “Promised Land” as told in a lovely story, long, long ago? I would think they’d know how to infiltrate any and all religions in order to play them against one another and dupe naive people into serving a cause not their own?

    I’m not sure Jews in general stand to benefit from the main accusations being made against Jews, other than it would serve to unite people. It could also make life unpleasant as it has in the past.

    My 2cents worth, thanks

  • @JustJeff
    @Jim

    Which suits the jews just fine. I'm sure they like having the goyim so emotional. They either get teary-eyed when the lolocaust is mentioned which makes them shill for Israel or they're conspiratorial cranks who think jews are behind every single misfortune and can thus be easily dismissed.

    Replies: @Jim

    Rational discussion of some topics is simply impossible in certain times and places.

  • @Priss Factor
    Going with globalism is like the tale of the dog with bone in its mouth staring at its reflection in the water.

    Globalism says it's all about more freedom, liberalism, and democracy. Globalism contrasts its wondrous fruits with nationalism and its poison weeds of repression, reaction, and fear(that must be rooted out).

    But as diversity increases in society, it leads to more tension, more fear, more distrust, more anxiety, more suspicion, more resentment, and more division. In order to contain such problems, the powers-that-be need to institute and enforce more speech controls, more surveillance, more penalty for certain expressions, more dogmatic propaganda in schools, and etc.

    So, by choosing globalism, you don't lose identity and heritage in exchange for more liberty and freedom.
    You lost both identity/heritage AND liberty/freedom.

    Only the globalist elites reap the reward. Since they have money, privilege, and connections, they can afford residence all over the world: London, NY, Warsaw, Paris, Tokyo, Seoul, Hong Kong, Mexico City, Sao Paolo, Athens, Istanbul, etc. They can have a ball as the 'citizens of the world', like Bill Clinton, Soros, Hollywood celebs, the Obamas.
    Even if they reject & lose their own identity and heritage, the world is their oyster. Why not lose their little nation when they can have the entire world as their globalist imperial playground?

    But for the masses? They will not only NOT gain the world but lose their small world that is their nation of heritage, ancestry, and history.

    Replies: @Bill Jones

    The current globalism being practiced on the West is merely what has been perpetrated on the rest of the world since WWII.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Anonymous
    @Bill Jones

    Globalism has been going on for 500 years now. Why do you think Jamaicans are black, and not Arawak and Taino Indians? It's just now the Indians are native Westerners.
  • @Bill Jones
    While we are bewailing the too little, too late efforts to save the greatest civilization ever created, enjoy some of its finer fruits.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZTZRtRFkvk

    But keep the First Lady of South Carolina, Little Linda Graham well clear of the boys in Red dresses.

    Replies: @geokat62

    But keep the First Lady of South Carolina, Little Linda Graham well clear of the boys in Red dresses.

    LOL!

  • While we are bewailing the too little, too late efforts to save the greatest civilization ever created, enjoy some of its finer fruits.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZTZRtRFkvk

    Video Link
    But keep the First Lady of South Carolina, Little Linda Graham well clear of the boys in Red dresses.

    •ï¿½Replies: @geokat62
    @Bill Jones


    But keep the First Lady of South Carolina, Little Linda Graham well clear of the boys in Red dresses.
    �
    LOL!
  • @Cagey Beast
    @Jim

    This is true. Before the web, the topic couldn't be discussed because of various sorts of official and unofficial censorship but now the problem is different. Now we have to navigate through a vast ocean of stupidity, trolling and mendacity. On the one hand you have people literally blaming the Jews for everything from global warming to the Boxer Rebellion and on the other you have Jews online claiming that a prayer said by them three times a day is of no real importance whatsoever. So many militantly stupid people "naming the Jew", and so many people trolling and counter-trolling, that the topic is best avoided entirely in online discussions.

    So much stupidity, so much lying that it's bad for one's mental hygiene. Arguing about the Jewish Question online is a great way to waste a beautiful mind.

    Replies: @Wally, @Stephen R. Diamond

    Censoring anti-Semitic comments avoids confronting the phenomena that white nationalism is highly attractive to anti-Semites. That it’s embarrassing is no good reason to hide this fact.

    Moreover, to ban discussion of Jews is to condemn oneself to militant stupidity and enforced ignorance. Jewish influence is highly significant politically: it is a major vector in Middle East politics, and Jews (racial or religious) Jews make up maybe a third of the billionairiate.

    The discussion decidedly suffers from neglecting the clannishness of the Jewish quasi-race, which amplifies the dominance they can obtain from their intellects. But this translates into the Jewish members of the ruling class acting as a kind of vanguard of the transnational bourgeoisie, and as such, this vanguard on the whole embodies their united interests.

    •ï¿½Replies: @NoseytheDuke
    @Stephen R. Diamond

    Agree. I don't even know what Jewish means, I think it means different things to different people including those claiming to be Jews themselves. Not being a "Dead-Sea Pedestrian" (credit the Pythons) myself, I ask myself, Is the general policy of modern Israel good for Jews in general? I think not. Jewish everything everywhere is undermined and tarnished, including tradition and culture by acts of inhumanity such as we've seen. True Jewishness is better than that. Even Einstein said that the future of world jewry would depend on how they resolved the Palestinian question. More people called him smart than they have me.

    There are good and bad amongst all people and to be sure there appears to exist vast conspiracies to destroy Nations, economies, races and cultures then brutally restructure humanity according to some evil Machiavellian scheme.How these overlap and who is at he centre of the web(s) I have no clue.

    I think such people would only view religion as a tool to exploit and would have their own epistemology rooted in harsh reality as in nature. Is it possible that it is ultimately tribal and genetic and such people may or may not have DNA linking them to the "Promised Land" as told in a lovely story, long, long ago? I would think they'd know how to infiltrate any and all religions in order to play them against one another and dupe naive people into serving a cause not their own?

    I'm not sure Jews in general stand to benefit from the main accusations being made against Jews, other than it would serve to unite people. It could also make life unpleasant as it has in the past.

    My 2cents worth, thanks
  • Sean says:
    @Ron Unz
    @Erik Sieven


    Once again I can only say Ron Unz should give you the power to moderate and delete comments so you won’t run the risk of incuring any legal trouble.
    �
    Well, since Peter Frost has periodically been complaining about being unable to moderate his own comments and several commenters here have now raised the same issue, I might as well explain the situation...

    When Frost began publishing his columns here, I gave him moderation privileges over his comments. I soon began receiving numerous complaints from commenters who claimed they had been censored and their comments unfairly deleted. In some cases, that was apparently because they had digressed into especially "touchy" subjects, but in other cases it was because they had attempted to factually dispute some of Frost's claims. I wasn't happy about this, but declined to intervene.

    Then he published a long article that I happened to read and disagree with. I very politely raised some technical objections to his analysis in the comments, and his responses became increasingly angry and insulting. I remained very polite, and merely pointed out why I felt my quantitative arguments were probably correct. Finally, he summarily deleted one of my long, detailed, and very polite comments:

    https://www.unz.com/pfrost/western-europe-state-formation-and-genetic-pacification-3/#comment-thread-896994

    I'm a remarkably easy-going fellow about such things, but I'll be damned if I'm going to allow my own (very polite) comments on technical issues to be censored on my own website.

    I daresay virtually any other website proprietor on the Internet would have summarily terminated a columnist who behaved in such an unreasonable manner. I merely revoked his moderation privileges.

    More recently, I've offered to restore his comment moderation privileges so long as (1) he agrees to avoid deleting my own polite and respectful comments in the future and (2) he agrees to moderate his comments in timely fashion, rather than having a huge number of them accumulate in the "pending" queue, thereby cluttering up the comment system and greatly inconveniencing the moderation of the comments for other columnists.

    He said he couldn't make such promises, since (as I recall) he claimed he might need to consult an attorney about approving many of the individual comments. Under such circumstances, it seemed that the least-bad legal option was for our website to continue moderating his comments, thereby providing him some "deniability" from whatever controversial sentiments they might express.

    I can understand why writers complain about "censorship" and I can also understand why those same individuals nonetheless feel compelled to censor comments that might get them into legal trouble. However, I find it less understandable why they would also censor comments that (very politely) point out their possible factual or quantitative errors.

    Replies: @Honorary Thief, @Dahlia, @Sean, @Sean the Neon Caucasian

    http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/race-iq-and-wealth/
    Peter has enduring genetic difference explanations for most human attainment and behavioural group differences and has never pretended to be proposing ” cultural or economic influence” to explain differential ethnic group achievement, although he did use a variant of youth bulge theory to explain the recent rise and falls in crime (competition / scarcity among young men). Anyway at Peter’s own blog there were none of these problems when you went there in 2012 to argue for your IQ hypothesis. I don’t think blog debate works well without the author having ultimate authority over commenters.

    The explicit mainstream view among development economists is entirely similar to what you were arguing for (ie non -immutable differences). In comments against the Frost/ Harpending crime paper you were again arguing a non controversial environmental-causation position . Harpending is the only full professor in the US who openly argues a strong HBD position. I suppose Peter may have felt responsible for defending their thesis, being a little embattled up against mainstream received wisdom plus your formidable debating skills, especially as you made some excellent points against the paper that he doubtless had high hopes for.

    He could have been far more sensitive to his being a guest at your table, and it might have been more obvious to you that when a commenter/proprietor/thinker-in-his-own-right sharply disagrees with one of his columnists over the basics on interpretation of evidence in their recently published work, any debate would reach an impasse rather quickly.

  • Peter, I have always enjoyed your posts and hope you will continue them in 2016. Although I suppose you could get summoned to a Canadian Star chamber, it seems unlikely and I expect you would win with a little help from your friends. Post on Brother.

  • @Stephen R. Diamond
    Your academic contributions are more valuable than your political tripe here published. For example:

    Meanwhile, there has been an incredible loss of will among Europe’s leaders to do anything, other than hectoring recalcitrant nations like Hungary for not taking their “fair share.â€
    �
    The analysis you offer is essentially that Western elites lack the will to resist the intense population pressure from Africa. (Their "universalism" gets the better of them.) This is simply politically stupid. Open borders has been a long-term project of the transnationals.

    Anyone who depicts this as a matter of "will" aims to encourage authoritarianism.

    Replies: @iffen

    Has anyone ever told you that you add value to the conversation? (Other than someone who may have noticed one of your more lucid comments, as difficult as these are to find, and thereby was mislead into thinking that there was a coherent mentality that produced said comment.)

  • @Cagey Beast
    @Jim

    This is true. Before the web, the topic couldn't be discussed because of various sorts of official and unofficial censorship but now the problem is different. Now we have to navigate through a vast ocean of stupidity, trolling and mendacity. On the one hand you have people literally blaming the Jews for everything from global warming to the Boxer Rebellion and on the other you have Jews online claiming that a prayer said by them three times a day is of no real importance whatsoever. So many militantly stupid people "naming the Jew", and so many people trolling and counter-trolling, that the topic is best avoided entirely in online discussions.

    So much stupidity, so much lying that it's bad for one's mental hygiene. Arguing about the Jewish Question online is a great way to waste a beautiful mind.

    Replies: @Wally, @Stephen R. Diamond

    IOW, you wish there was no discussion period about the nature of neurotic, in-bred, control freak Jews.

    Gatekeeper wannabes such as yourself long for the good old days when things were a bit more easy to control.

    The game has changed, get used to it.

  • German_reader says:
    @Erik Sieven
    @German_reader

    For me speaking about differences between Judaism and Christianity as a (right-wing) German politician is a bit like talking about differences between men and women as a convicted murderer of three ex-wifes. Of course those differences exist, and one can talk about them, for example in a theology course at the Uni, or in the case of the gender differences in a Loriot-like funny way. But in this context it is inappropriate I think.

    Replies: @German_reader

    Don’t know if I agree with that. Frankly, I’m tired of those self-satisfied Christian Democrat politicians with all their nonsense about our Judeo-Christian values. I’ve got enough of this reclericalization of Germany, at a time when the country is more atheist than ever, and it’s time to expose those Christian Democrat fools as the cretins they are. Maybe taking apart their “Judeo-Christian” nonsense isn’t the best place to start, but I can understand the motivation.
    Besides, Höcke later added that he thought Judaism was a “great religion” and that he himself had been influenced by the thought of Martin Buber. Höcke’s certainly a nationalist and a “racist”, but I’ve seen nothing to indicate that he’s really an antisemite.

  • Go back to your original blog, Peter. You can then moderate comments and your readers will be spared the incessant arguing over Jews. There are 100 times more Muslims in the world than Jews. Yet somehow this tiny population is responsible for all our problems. I’m getting tired of reading the continual comments in this vein, it detracts from the topic at hand. Those commenters didn’t come to your old blog but they infest this entire site. Sadly because there are many insightful articles here (no, I’m not Jewish).

  • Your academic contributions are more valuable than your political tripe here published. For example:

    Meanwhile, there has been an incredible loss of will among Europe’s leaders to do anything, other than hectoring recalcitrant nations like Hungary for not taking their “fair share.â€

    The analysis you offer is essentially that Western elites lack the will to resist the intense population pressure from Africa. (Their “universalism” gets the better of them.) This is simply politically stupid. Open borders has been a long-term project of the transnationals.

    Anyone who depicts this as a matter of “will” aims to encourage authoritarianism.

    •ï¿½Replies: @iffen
    @Stephen R. Diamond

    Has anyone ever told you that you add value to the conversation? (Other than someone who may have noticed one of your more lucid comments, as difficult as these are to find, and thereby was mislead into thinking that there was a coherent mentality that produced said comment.)
  • @Art
    "Instead of replacing native Europeans, why not replace their leaders? Why not vote them out of office? "

    Why not vote Trump in? He is without question an American nationalist.

    Bomb-bast and all, he is a true red, white, and blue old fashioned can do American. That is a good thing!

    He is not a legal type, a banker, a politician - he is a builder – let him rebuild America.

    Elect him.

    Replies: @epochehusserl, @geokat62

    Elect him.

    Hi, Art. Not sure if you’ve seen my most recent comment on another thread:

    Thanks for sharing the link, schmenz.

    Sam, remember your comment about a strong POTUS and that Trump represented the only hope to stand up to AIPAC? Interested in getting your comments on the following:

    On the subject of Israel, Trump added, “Sheldon knows that nobody will be more loyal to Israel than Donald Trump.â€

    [Trump’s] also the only Republican candidate with Jewish grandkids: his daughter, Ivanka, became Orthodox after marrying real estate scion Jared Kushner. The family keeps kosher, observes the Sabbath and attends the upscale synagogue Congregation Kehilath Jeshurun.

    http://news.yahoo.com/republican-donor-adelson-trump-may-aligning-israel-003125447--finance.html

    •ï¿½Replies: @Art
    @geokat62

    Trump and Israel?

    First Trump says he loves everyone - Mexicans, blacks, and Jews. Maybe it is true.

    Trump knows Jews – one can not function as he has in NYC, and not know Jews. I think that there is an earned respect both ways.

    I trust the Jews to know Jew business. Just looking at the Jew controlled media - it is clear that the Jews have a real fear of him. He is too powerful a personality – he does not totally fear them.

    I think that he will assure Israel's safety – but will not give them the family jewels when they demand them. I think that the Jews will not want for him to get his back up against them and go public about their demands. All it would take is for Trump to speak out as President and the whole Zionist Jew game is over. The last thing the Jew want is a public fight over them. (Actually more and more Jews and Gentiles are turning against Zionism.)

    So with Trump as president there will be no more standing-o Mufti Netanyahu speeches before all of congress.

    Sounds not to bad. Elect him!

    Replies: @Art
  • spandrell says: •ï¿½Website

    If people are going to get prosecuted because of a comments section they have no power over, the obvious solution is to not have a comments section.

    Some commenters can run a subreddit about your writing and link to your posts over there. You can’t be prosecuted because of links to a different site (reddit) which you have no control over.

    May I suggest Ron Unz could do it himself, there would be no higher service done to the cause of free speech in the Western World. Perhaps instead of hosting the blog as an associate, Ron could do as he is done recently with Krugman, and just link to other blogs without their overt consent in order to supply a comment platform.

    But at any rate close this comments section immediately, and the one on your blog. I don’t know what kind of arrangement Ron Unz has with writers here, but getting in legal trouble is surely not worth it.

  • @Art
    "Instead of replacing native Europeans, why not replace their leaders? Why not vote them out of office? "

    Why not vote Trump in? He is without question an American nationalist.

    Bomb-bast and all, he is a true red, white, and blue old fashioned can do American. That is a good thing!

    He is not a legal type, a banker, a politician - he is a builder – let him rebuild America.

    Elect him.

    Replies: @epochehusserl, @geokat62

    Because that would be racialist and nativist. They even have to invent a vocabulary for this. Believing in the concept of a nation is nativist? The new left’s is a religion. People will swallow poison if they can be convinced that everyone else is swallowing poison and they can gain status from swallowing poison. Who do they think they are not swallowing poison? The serious believers really believe in this stuff. You have to explain that the litmus test for any idea is how real people are affected. You can oppose racialist witch hunts without being a nazi. That is their biggest fear is being a nazi. When people are reassured that there are alternatives between auschwitz and the new left then you can start having a dialogue.

    •ï¿½Agree: Digital Samizdat
  • @German_reader
    @Erik Sieven

    "Though I think Höcke´s comments about Christianity and Judaism were very unnecessary."

    Maybe unneccessary, but they were essentially correct. "Judeo-Christian" is an idiotic term that tries to obfuscate the long history of enmity between the two religions. For most of the last two millenia relations between Jews and Christians weren't exactly friendly, and in some ways Judaism has more in common with Islam than with Christianity (there are some good blog posts by Razib Khan about this subject from a few years ago).
    But you're right that it was an unwise move by Höcke to make such a statement about an issue which is pretty irrelevant anyway nowadays. I sometimes get the impression Höcke is a political autist and doesn't get or care how his statements will be interpreted in Germany's hyper-conformist political climate.

    Replies: @Jim, @Erik Sieven

    For me speaking about differences between Judaism and Christianity as a (right-wing) German politician is a bit like talking about differences between men and women as a convicted murderer of three ex-wifes. Of course those differences exist, and one can talk about them, for example in a theology course at the Uni, or in the case of the gender differences in a Loriot-like funny way. But in this context it is inappropriate I think.

    •ï¿½Replies: @German_reader
    @Erik Sieven

    Don't know if I agree with that. Frankly, I'm tired of those self-satisfied Christian Democrat politicians with all their nonsense about our Judeo-Christian values. I've got enough of this reclericalization of Germany, at a time when the country is more atheist than ever, and it's time to expose those Christian Democrat fools as the cretins they are. Maybe taking apart their "Judeo-Christian" nonsense isn't the best place to start, but I can understand the motivation.
    Besides, Höcke later added that he thought Judaism was a "great religion" and that he himself had been influenced by the thought of Martin Buber. Höcke's certainly a nationalist and a "racist", but I've seen nothing to indicate that he's really an antisemite.
  • @Regnum Nostrum
    The only way how to stop massive migration is to remove the causes which bring it about. Wars, destruction of countries, economic misery, etc. If the causes persist the migration will continue and nothing will stop it.

    Replies: @Erik Sieven

    when it rains an umbrella helps. It is no good idea to give up using umbrellas for the reason that to make the rain stop one would need to intervene in the complex mechanisms which work in clouds.

  • Art says:

    “Instead of replacing native Europeans, why not replace their leaders? Why not vote them out of office? “

    Why not vote Trump in? He is without question an American nationalist.

    Bomb-bast and all, he is a true red, white, and blue old fashioned can do American. That is a good thing!

    He is not a legal type, a banker, a politician – he is a builder – let him rebuild America.

    Elect him.

    •ï¿½Replies: @epochehusserl
    @Art

    Because that would be racialist and nativist. They even have to invent a vocabulary for this. Believing in the concept of a nation is nativist? The new left's is a religion. People will swallow poison if they can be convinced that everyone else is swallowing poison and they can gain status from swallowing poison. Who do they think they are not swallowing poison? The serious believers really believe in this stuff. You have to explain that the litmus test for any idea is how real people are affected. You can oppose racialist witch hunts without being a nazi. That is their biggest fear is being a nazi. When people are reassured that there are alternatives between auschwitz and the new left then you can start having a dialogue.
    , @geokat62
    @Art


    Elect him.
    �
    Hi, Art. Not sure if you've seen my most recent comment on another thread:

    Thanks for sharing the link, schmenz.

    Sam, remember your comment about a strong POTUS and that Trump represented the only hope to stand up to AIPAC? Interested in getting your comments on the following:

    On the subject of Israel, Trump added, “Sheldon knows that nobody will be more loyal to Israel than Donald Trump.â€

    [Trump's] also the only Republican candidate with Jewish grandkids: his daughter, Ivanka, became Orthodox after marrying real estate scion Jared Kushner. The family keeps kosher, observes the Sabbath and attends the upscale synagogue Congregation Kehilath Jeshurun.

    http://news.yahoo.com/republican-donor-adelson-trump-may-aligning-israel-003125447--finance.html
    �

    Replies: @Art
  • @Jim
    @Peter Frost

    Having a calm objective discussion of the role of Jews in the contemporary world seems almost impossible. Probably only historians of our times many centuries in the future will be able to do so.

    Replies: @JustJeff, @Cagey Beast

    This is true. Before the web, the topic couldn’t be discussed because of various sorts of official and unofficial censorship but now the problem is different. Now we have to navigate through a vast ocean of stupidity, trolling and mendacity. On the one hand you have people literally blaming the Jews for everything from global warming to the Boxer Rebellion and on the other you have Jews online claiming that a prayer said by them three times a day is of no real importance whatsoever. So many militantly stupid people “naming the Jew”, and so many people trolling and counter-trolling, that the topic is best avoided entirely in online discussions.

    So much stupidity, so much lying that it’s bad for one’s mental hygiene. Arguing about the Jewish Question online is a great way to waste a beautiful mind.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Wally
    @Cagey Beast

    IOW, you wish there was no discussion period about the nature of neurotic, in-bred, control freak Jews.

    Gatekeeper wannabes such as yourself long for the good old days when things were a bit more easy to control.

    The game has changed, get used to it.
    , @Stephen R. Diamond
    @Cagey Beast

    Censoring anti-Semitic comments avoids confronting the phenomena that white nationalism is highly attractive to anti-Semites. That it's embarrassing is no good reason to hide this fact.

    Moreover, to ban discussion of Jews is to condemn oneself to militant stupidity and enforced ignorance. Jewish influence is highly significant politically: it is a major vector in Middle East politics, and Jews (racial or religious) Jews make up maybe a third of the billionairiate.

    The discussion decidedly suffers from neglecting the clannishness of the Jewish quasi-race, which amplifies the dominance they can obtain from their intellects. But this translates into the Jewish members of the ruling class acting as a kind of vanguard of the transnational bourgeoisie, and as such, this vanguard on the whole embodies their united interests.

    Replies: @NoseytheDuke
  • @Rehmat
    @Hitler

    Neyth Nethanyahu - When was the last time you opened the Holy Talmud? Israeli historian Israel Shahak called it the most hate religious literature in the world. It curses Jesus, Mary and Christians. Holy Qur'an on the other hand, raises Jesus and Mary to the level of prophet Moses and his mother.

    If Hitler loved Muslims, how come he never higher a single Muslim in his administration, which was loaded with Christians and Jews.

    Nazi army had 150,000 German Jews but not a single Muslim.

    In October 2015, Netanyahu told the 37th World Zionist Congress that Adolf Hitler only wanted to expel the German Jews, but he was advised by Palestinian Mufti al-Haj Amin al-Husseini (d. 1974 in Lebanon) to exterminate the Jews.....

    http://rehmat1.com/2015/10/22/netanyahu-absolves-hitler-of-holocaust/

    Replies: @This Is Our Home, @random observer, @RadicalCenter

    A Muslim says ‘watch out for the 15 million Jews’ and ‘but ignore the 1.5 billion Muslims.’

    Boring…

  • Just publicly quit while continuing to write under a pseudonym. I’d recommend Dick Freeze or Johnson Snow. But, seriously, keep writing and Merry Christmas.