Are you…”transgender”?
Double thanks, I’d never heard his speaking vox before, like some sounds I dislike (metal on teeth or porcelain the worst for me).
On the other hand, his recent article on the original Night of the Living Dead is great, I’d guess that you read it, if not, it’s essential.
Their nihilism is causing them to destroy industry, education, law and order, and much else besides. “Green energy” alone will cause social collapse if they persist with that part of their agenda, as solar panels and windmills are not remotely adequate as a substitute for fossil fuels. The US is like a patient suffering from multiple terminal illnesses. That patient may not die of the cancer eating him alive, but only because his heart disease, his full-blown AIDS, or his cirrhosis gets him first.
Homosexuality is sickening.
Western societies are doomed because of mass third world immigration. Sadly. All coordinated by the tribe. They don’t like successful white Christian European civilization. So they seek to destroy it. And they are.
Sorry about stating the obvious. 😄
Even 99% of the Liberals in the US during WWII was totally against homosexuality.
Even the secular psychological community was against it.
Globo-Homo is Jewish proxy.
Poor Mulga, Filled With Chutzpah (And Little Else) Stuck Upon Horns Of Dilemma
Mulga, buddy: u’re just one of the more successful TROLLS for Unz Review, aren’t u?–not that I object, old buddy. For what is a troll but some cantankerous individual who cannot be handled so easily, rhetorically or polemically, by the regulars–who can’t pin a troll like u down except to observe u’re a troll who hypocritically calls out others for their trolling, right? Ho ho ho
But so far, we’ve exposed u for ur chutzpah pretending to be arbiter of non-existent “good-evil,” typical denouncer of “racism” which is actually outstanding virtue of LOYALTY. And now here we see u want to play both sides of Christian vs. satanic (as if u even understand Christianity)–like u do for “good vs. evil,” and now subjective vs. objective.
Regardless, TRUTH (= Christ, Gosp. JOHN 14:6) can only exist in an objective reality–which rejects ur satanism which satanism is founded naturally in subjectivism, satanism the exploiter of subjectivism and hence all the pathetic, over-populated “liberals” and leftist weaklings and inferiors–where truth becomes merely “truth” of the relativist (subjectivist), Talmudic “midrash” and “party-line,” enforced by the Gestapo, so to speak, of arbitrary good/evil and “liberal” enforcers as we presently see–anti-fa and Black Lives Matter, et al.
So here’s ur problem, Mulga, buddy: as Aristotle pt’d out, objective reality is axiomatic–meaning it can’t be denied without contradiction–as subjectivism is grossly and plainly absurd. We only understand as we reason and make use of logic, and u can’t have those without objectivity–so we’re stuck w. objectivity, which precludes ur chutzpah and equally absurd and non-existent “good-evil” which only works for children and inferiors like “liberals” and leftists. Poor Mulga who cannot stand truth or objectivity.
However one may feel about either Adolf Hitler or Joseph Stalin– and, I know many have reason to dislike them– at least they were against Homosexuality. This is more than one can say for “American” Society at present!
What ‘objective’ reality would that be? Life after death, for Eternity, or boiling in agony in Hell, for Eternity? What is Eternity after all? That is meant to be ‘Truth’ in your psychic inferno, is it? And what is an atrocity committed by ‘Christians’? ‘Collateral damage’ to the ‘Truth’? You’re not even seeking the Truth-apparently you had it from birth.
About Frankfurt – Germany:
I was there in 2014 for about 5-6 weeks.
At first was not sure did I arrive into India, Pakistan, or Turkey? – meaning the local population
Off course there were plenty of others as well (from various nations/ cultures).
Actually in a small shop “bazaar” I get an instant cc. 20% discount on merchandise because I was not German.
To be honest had no problems at all – I mean with migrants.
Furthermore I get the advise from many (included folks from India, Turkey, Arabic, Polish): be aware “Jewish maffia rules Frankfurt”. Or at least part of that: plazas, around financial institutions/ buildings.
So actually migrants warned me to be careful around certain places/ their security/ with police.
Germany lost and not because migration.
It is lost in 1945 and the things what followed.
(So yes: Magda Goebbels was right: the world what come after 45 just as her worst fears. )
As did lost west/ north Europe: because what it did, what it became.
They lost because their society, because their popular ideologies, such as: liberal-woke-feminist-environmentalist/ green – vegan – antifa-anarchist – lgbt- no babies -animal rights – self-hatred etc… madness.
Funny thing: temporary workers/ migrants DO understand this – rotten societies does not.
Off course will not respect such “society”.
As regards Matthew and Mark, that dating is for the Greek versions. Robinson argues that the Hebrew/Aramaic versions were written much earlier. Robinson acknowledges that Luke and John were written later in Greek before A.D. 70, not in the late 1st or early 2nd century (or later) as maintained by some scholars.
Probably there are some who can turn around things in the USA.
I remember during THEIR virus fear mongering/ lockdowns there were some promising persons who stand up and resisting madness.
Particulary after closer look of deeds Ronald DeSantis because he had various right policies apart from that and a certain moral compass.
If he can solve this too:
Then would be a proper candidate for US president.
Someone who can bring some relative “young” attitude into that Gerontocracy.
The Bolsheviks were dominated by Jewish communists. They killed 10 million during the communist holodomor 1934- 37, which is buried by the media, unlike the holocaust hype. Another 10 million died in Siberia.
They dominated the communists in Europe between the world wars and the USSR satellite states too, after WW2.
The Federal Reserve bankers financed Hitler and the Nazis rise to power. They had a split when he kicked out the bankers.
Congressman Louis McFadden tried to expose this and was railroaded by Jewish money from congress. His death had mysterious circumstances.
Fuck this filthy sniveling Kike.
Yeah….
You got us dumbass WHITE folk all figured out Uncle Remus.
Now go loot a Foot Locker, or whatever else your KIKE masters demand you to do.
Youse bees proud a dat double-digit IQ.
I “70% agree” with your statements, based on my interactions with Jews, and the best polling on Jewish views on issues like abortion. An issue today is that many “mainline protestants” hold that same view like Presbyterians, and they are not judaizers.
‘Bless the LORD, O my soul, And forget none of His benefits; Who pardons all your iniquities, Who heals all your diseases; Who redeems your life from the pit,
Who crowns you with lovingkindness and compassion; Who satisfies your years with good things, So that your youth is renewed like the eagle.
The LORD is compassionate and gracious, Slow to anger and abounding in lovingkindness.
He will not always strive with us, Nor will He keep His anger forever. He has not dealt with us according to our sins, Nor rewarded us according to our iniquities.
For as high as the heavens are above the earth, So great is His lovingkindness toward those who fear Him.
As far as the east is from the west, So far has He removed our transgressions from us.
Just as a father has compassion on his children, So the LORD has compassion on those who fear Him.
(Psalms 103:2-5, 8-13)
I am going to add a comment, despite my own personal place regarding faith and practice.
“His morality, minus the religious mambo-jambo, has been reiterated by other moral teachers for millennia, and mostly totally ignored by ‘Christians’ only really interested in ‘pie in the sky, when you die’. What on Earth does ‘objective reality’ or Truth have to do with belief in a patriarchal, vengeful, God? Doesn’t Jesus say that you must accept all the Judaic insanity of the Old Testament, with its misogyny, homophobia, contempt for nature (‘subdue the world’)etc? I do admire your hubris, however.”
I know of no other system that offers a salvation based not on performance but faith. And you need to actually put forth some concrete examples because the without them a response would be devoid of value, because it would be easy to claim
“oho that is just mumbo jumbo”. In which case everyone’s mumbo jumbo is mumbo jumbo. No Christ does not demand one believe in the OT. His references to the OT have primarily to do with messaging jews, who would expect the past to be demonstrated in the present and jesus constantly makes those references for their benefit.
If you can demonstrate instances of jesus by way of example as a
misogynist, homophobic, contemptuous of nature . . . have at it.
Mo Zi as i understand thought music a waste of time.
How is that the people of the way, the doa are responsible for so much bloodshed . . . Chinese warfare as is that of Asia is legendary in its slaughter, rape and pillaging.
What Christ offers is for you to have a relationship with him in real time. Are humans a oft a lousy example of christ — of God — absolutely. It’s easy to hind behind christian failure and ignore counter examples. Rejecting same relational conduct is not homophobia. And is no more acceptable than relations outside of marriage or theft, etc.
Mulga Resorts To Babbling For Opposition To Western (Hence Christian) Culture
Sorry Mulga, buddy, but I don’t think u’re all there; u make no sense (as regarding ur “good-evil” nonsense). Christianity is worship of truth (= Christ, Gosp. JOHN 14:6), perfectly rationalistic, and it effectively provides its philosophic framework in the mythic allegory as presented in New Test.–no less than the previous Western, Greek paradigm given by Homer in “Illiad” and “Oddysey”–Christianity was/is the “new wave,” so to speak, including, entailing, but also superseding Homer, as it did Old Test.
Thus Christianity affirms the OBJECTIVE reality in opposition to the extreme subjectivism/satanism given in Judaic “Oral Law Trad.”–which devilry seems to rule ur mind, eh?–along w. so many others. And there are no “Christian atrocities” anymore than there are Homeric atrocities. U admire “hubris”?–I suggest that’s good part of ur problems–u seem to imagine chutzpah is the be-all and end-all for things. Get a brain and a clue.
What never fails to amuse and anger me in equal measures is when I hear British people saying how they’d be speaking German had it not been for men like Bomber Harris. The same Harris who turned Dresden and Hamburg into urban crematoria whilst back on the home front English girls were busy creating the first generation of mulattoes (courtesy of black American GIs) and British shopkeepers were refusing to serve white Americans. The latter offended the upstanding morals of John Bull by insisting on racial segregation. I daresay had Mr Bull adopted the same principles London and Birmingham would still be 99.9% white British. What a joke! And on a final note, how many white Germans died in Frankfurt when the Allies rained bombs down on that city?
The beauty and power of the OT texts is that it provides depth to the meaning on many of the gopsel and Epistles which were written to further verify and enlighten jews who had come to adopt Christ and for non jews it provided back ground and substance. There is no doubt that the depth of meaning is can be enhanced by the grasping both the literal and metaphorical existences in the old as it relates to the new.
both Christ and the Apostles bridge the old to the new but whatever enhanced meaning, justificationm and verification of the Christ by so doing is not intended to place jewish practice above that of Christ ‘s call. nor does it call for the persecution of jews. There simply is no evidence of either call in scripture.
admittedly way out of my depth here
But Apollo, how do you explain ‘Christian’ atrocities? You know, the Thirty Years War, colonial exterminations in the New World, witch-burnings, Inquisitions, religious wars like the one in Ukraine now, Judeophobia such as yours etc. Satan taking over, is it.
Christ is a great moral teacher, but is he any greater than the Buddha, Lao Zi, Mo Zi, Confucius etc. His morality, minus the religious mambo-jambo, has been reiterated by other moral teachers for millennia, and mostly totally ignored by ‘Christians’ only really interested in ‘pie in the sky, when you die’. What on Earth does ‘objective reality’ or Truth have to do with belief in a patriarchal, vengeful, God? Doesn’t Jesus say that you must accept all the Judaic insanity of the Old Testament, with its misogyny, homophobia, contempt for nature (‘subdue the world’)etc? I do admire your hubris, however.
So tell me, Chris, did your mother have any children that lived?
“Good-Evil” Don’t Exist Except As Madness, Like Satanism And Hubris
No, “evil” (or “good”) is not “plain to those w. eyes to see”; it couldn’t be as it is abstract, an idea or notion or perhaps a quality of idea or notion–to judge fm how it is understood and spoken of. “Evil” couldn’t be “greed” as it is so common, not always acted upon, and regarding “violence,” there is defensive violence–these are just examples of ur own mental incoherence and the great difficulty in saying what it is or could be.
“[H]atred of life on earth?–I guess Homer is “evil” when he says (in effect) that life sucks–life is one problem after another, and it can be quite painful and bothersome at times for lots of folks. “Hatred”/repulsion has degrees to it, like love/attraction, they being emotional reciprocals. Hatred could be mild dislike or annoyance, like affection is somewhat attractive fragrance.
Yes, “evil” and “good” are subjective–“evil” is what I don’t like, etc. So u effectively admit as it is subjective, it doesn’t and couldn’t really exist. “Ethno-religious fanaticism”?–well, I take it seriously, and as I note, Christianity and satanism are two tremendously PHILOSOPHICAL-oriented religions, “religion” the outer husk and vehicle designed to make them (the philosophy) relatable or practically applicable for humans, the social gatherings and prayers, the icons and statuary, even the music and choral singing, etc. U may see it as “fanaticism,” but I merely consider I take it w. great seriousness–as so many do–pls excuse us for that seriousness which u see as “fanatic,” but I assure u I try to temper it all w. reason, as Christ (or the Holy Spirit) would have us do, right?
Thus Judaism is forthright militarism–war against humanity and “Amalek” (gentiles), and it entails sociology, politics, and economics. Christianity is literary allegory upon TRUTH (= Christ, Gosp. JOHN 14:6) as it makes its painful way through life of persecution and suffering, each one who defends such truth having to bear his/her “cross,” which truth can NEVER be killed as u Pharisees tried to kill Christ, because truth arises fm the objective reality. And such God-given reality cannot be killed, truth ALWAYS RESURRECTING, coming back to bite–u Jews universally and understandably hated by all races and cultures, kicked-out of nearly every country numerous times–there are more expulsions coming, comrade, don’t doubt.
Thus the Christ figure in New Test. need never to have existed in actual reality and history–it’s just a mythic characterologic substitute for the sacred truth. And “satan”?–satan doesn’t exist either, but satanism surely does: it’s that extreme HUBRIS which imagines it is literally God-like, as u Jews do, pretending they create reality, according to the definition. But satanism isn’t “evil”–it’s simply madness–somewhat like u, Mulga, would u say?
I had a similar question after I watched this discussion by Aramaic specialist Dr James David Audlin on YouTube’s History Valley.
He shows how quite a lot of detail existed in the ‘original Aramaic gospels?’ that was left out of the ‘later’ Greek.
The Aramaic surely must have come first. And if anything this gives only credence to the veracity of a Jesus figure, no matter what else might have been said or made of him.
"certainly" ? How could you be so sure ? 😃😊
The NT was certainly written in Greek, the lingua franca of the time.
�
Is it true that the Sermon on the Mount in the Aramaic New Testament rhymes?
That to me would indicate that Aramaic was the original NT language.
Cromwell set the WASP agenda:
Pro Jew
Anti Catholic
And here, u even capitalize the "evil," which u obviously love soooo much as it means soooo much to u, making use of it in practically EVERY entry u make--ur ultimate argument by which u conquer.
"These people are of the essence of Evil,...."
�
Evil is plain to those with eyes to see. Evil is greed and violence, and the hatred of Life on Earth. Of course the judging of Evil is subjective. You may indeed find the destruction of Life and unbridled greed to not be wicked. That is your prerogative. You may indulge it, and your pretentious illiteracy to your heart’s content.
I certainly don’t see Evil in everyone, but I get a whiff of it reading your pompous rant, with its stench of ethnoreligious fanaticism. Satan keeps you awake at night, does he? Apollo? More a cut-rate Dionysus, drunk on his own bombast.
Judaism/Talmudism Is A War-Philosophy/Strategy, Necessarily
See my # 152, above. U must understand exactly what Judaism/Talmudism is–it’s “Oral Law Trad.,” the Torah “interpreted” (called “midrash”–which becomes the “party-line”) by the rabbis, for benefit/dominance/rulership of Jews collectively, though the lower level Jews serve same function of foot-soldiers who might be casualties.
So Judaism is overall SUBJECTIVISM–all reality is negotiable and ever-debate-able–it only depends upon the tactical/strategic situation, as in “situation ethics,” the purpose being the military/political/economic advantage of Jews, decided by their leaders, the rabbis. Note Judaism is EXTREMELY philosophic religion in its way–as is Christianity, worship of truth (= Christ, Gosp. JOHN 14:6) which is meaningless without the objective, Aristotelian reality as context. These, Judaism and Christianity are Hegelian anti-theses, absolutely opposed and totally incompatible.
So their Judaic God is very much a war-God, confirmed by their holy day of Passover, and the relatively minor holy day of Purim. Hannukah is yet another military memorialization.
Note then as Judaism is SUBJECTIVIST, all the followers must be, just to start with. The leaders however are ultra pragmatists, looking for long-term consequences, considering all possible implications. And as subjectivism is consciousness creating reality (see the Wikipedia entry), extreme subjectivism (the obligatory mentality of the leaders) is outright satanism, making themselves collectivistically, co-equal w. God (again, even though some Jews may end up as casualties).
So one can accurately say Judaism is subjectivism/satanism, many Jews, of the lower levels, often, naively, and quite plausibly denying they’re outright satanists, though the top leaders must necessarily be outright satanists. Jews excuse and explain this satanism away especially in their “Zohar” (“Cabala”), entailing outright mysticism by saying that one of the emanations or forms of God is satan, holding a multi-nature, or double-nature identity of God. Good sources on Judaism are RevisionistReview.blogspot.com, Talmudical.blogspot.com, Come-and-hear.com, and TruthTellers.org
We are of Her, and She of Us. As Leonardo observed, everything is connected to everything else.
The “free market” argument I have read against the usury angle is bankruptcy law. There used to be debtors prisons, which would make debt jubilees obviously very important. Now people can file bankruptcy and ruin their credit. I have been a victim of this from the “lenders” angle for an unfulfilled home contractor’s job.
I concede, sin is the norm, and I wouldn’t doubt, from the beginning, church members were finding ways to “follow the law, but kill the spirit of the law.”
In a Venn diagram, what is the overlap between secret/open Satanists, and sincere Jews? Because that is the implication in the article. I do agree, a lot of Jews are consumed with Europhobia, Christophobia, and a hatred for Western Culture. It’s totally understandable, if you accept everyone is susceptible to sin.
My view is the opposite: You had ancient Jews harbor a legit hatred for the Roman Empire, their “heretical offshoot from a crazed Rabbi” slowly becomes the state Religion, and completely renders ancient Judaism incoherent. Jews were/are pissed that the prophecy was fulfilled on God’s terms, not theirs, a King, Kingdom, and Warlord.
I did not watch all of Adam Green's shows, so I might be wrong, but it seems to me that he is overlooking an important component of today's destructive processes.
‘Judas Goat’ leading the (goy) sheep to ultimate destruction and slaughter.
�
Yes, you’re right. And, we’re winning.
Happy New Year!
I did not watch all of Adam Green's shows, so I might be wrong, but it seems to me that he is overlooking an important component of today's destructive processes.
‘Judas Goat’ leading the (goy) sheep to ultimate destruction and slaughter.
�
eeyip … see these two interesting expositives … https://twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1kvJpmllYXdxE and https://twitter.com/i/broadcasts/
I am not a fan of the statue yanking as opposed to putting up counter symbols. However, the US has been removing symbols they disfavor since the revolution. In this case statues in the public area honoring men who supported armed rebellion —
the true meaning of the word treason should be a tough sell to any citizen, including the southern states. However, I get the glue of ancestry, southern loyalties . . .etc. States may do as they see fit, I guess. But on federals lands probably not a good idea to honor treasonous behavior. There is but one exception and its slim. The military academies, which may honor those whose military service serve as value as lessons or virtues of those whose military acumen, courage, leadership strategic genius or failure are worth remembering.
or maybe I still have thing for the long legs of Miss Coulter but her if we are raising symbols at the academies for purely social acknowledgement of a personal choice . . . she has a point. How significant the matter — is unknown.
That is a powerful claim. Very interesting and helpful, thanks.Adam Green (Know More News on BitChute) doesn't discuss the usury angle, but has Jesus Christ as another of their creations but with the specific task of leading the sheep (geopolitically) into precisely the time we are experiencing now; a kind of 'armageddon', this nightmare dystopia etc, where the Christ role will be reversed becoming the redeemed and heroic 'Judas Goat' leading the (goy) sheep to ultimate destruction and slaughter.i.e. we don't need Roman provenance.I admit that I hate to believe all this kind of data, but I also know that they are the real facts of our precarious situation.And don't they also seem to love sodomy as much as they love usury?Replies: @folkvangr
There was an urgent need to stifle the competition, and preferably in such a way that usury became a moral crime, i.e., a sin for non-Jews. Thus arises the legend of Christ, who allegedly cursed usurers...
�
‘Judas Goat’ leading the (goy) sheep to ultimate destruction and slaughter.
I did not watch all of Adam Green’s shows, so I might be wrong, but it seems to me that he is overlooking an important component of today’s destructive processes.
In the example of Hollywood, we have already seen the Jews’ love of relishing in the humiliation of the goyim. Therefore, in the spirit of their national pastime, Jews crave to witness the complete moral degradation of the goyim and their renunciation of everything on which Christian civilization was founded. That is, they want them to commit spiritual suicide before physical death.
But why are we talking about sad things today? lol
Thank you for your response and Happy New Year!
It’s weird how this kind of psychological operation can hold entire nations, people, prisoner against their own selves.
I do admire Anne for openly speaking about this; as the risks are at so many levels.
The last photo says it all.
Unfortunately, Anne supported the invasions into Middle East after 9/11. I guess she wasn’t thinking about the long term affects this would do to the invading nations.
I was against it from day one. I saw through the lies. I caught what they were doing very quickly when they opened the borders in Europe for all the Nations we had been bombing.
We bomb people, kill their children, destroy their nations, and then INVITE THEM INTO OUR NATIONS. Of course they couldn’t hide the terror attacks that started up immediately but it’s interesting how they’ve made it almost illegal to report on this fact in Europe.
Sadly, many Non-Jewish Whites, in fact, a large segment of them, Go along with the Genocidal national suicide that has almost become Irreversible at this point.
And here, u even capitalize the "evil," which u obviously love soooo much as it means soooo much to u, making use of it in practically EVERY entry u make--ur ultimate argument by which u conquer.
"These people are of the essence of Evil,...."
�
“Knowing good and evil” is the distinguishing characteristic of those who would be “gods.” Us Free Wild Peoples of all Kinds, when that tempting proposition was dangled before us back at the beginning, said thanks-but-no-thanks. We’ve been much more adamant (and much less polite) about it since then, with each succeeding “offer we (supposedly) couldn’t refuse.”
Until here and now at THE END of Days, we can only pity and laugh-at the poor damned fools who can’t help but persist in their “project” clear to its bitter end. We did try to let them know, though, that they really had no idea what they were messing with here. Of-course like Custer and his troops, however, they have no ears….nor any Vision.
There was an urgent need to stifle the competition, and preferably in such a way that usury became a moral crime, i.e., a sin for non-Jews. Thus arises the legend of Christ, who allegedly cursed usurers…
That is a powerful claim. Very interesting and helpful, thanks.
Adam Green (Know More News on BitChute) doesn’t discuss the usury angle, but has Jesus Christ as another of their creations but with the specific task of leading the sheep (geopolitically) into precisely the time we are experiencing now; a kind of ‘armageddon’, this nightmare dystopia etc, where the Christ role will be reversed becoming the redeemed and heroic ‘Judas Goat’ leading the (goy) sheep to ultimate destruction and slaughter.
i.e. we don’t need Roman provenance.
I admit that I hate to believe all this kind of data, but I also know that they are the real facts of our precarious situation.
And don’t they also seem to love sodomy as much as they love usury?
I did not watch all of Adam Green's shows, so I might be wrong, but it seems to me that he is overlooking an important component of today's destructive processes.
‘Judas Goat’ leading the (goy) sheep to ultimate destruction and slaughter.
�
“These people” have cursed Life Herownself. Better for them if they’d never been born. As for us, we’re with Her.
Thank you and Happy New Year to you too.
As is well known, usury was not invented by Jews, but it was they who made it their national treasure. Although the Old Testament forbade lending to one’s fellow tribesman, limited debt slavery and appointed periodic debt forgiveness, the Jewish usurers found loopholes. They began to lend to other tribes and amassed the capital that enabled them to begin exploring the continent of Europe. Here they encountered strong competition from local merchants and moneylenders, which reached a peak just as the first Christian sects emerged. There was an urgent need to stifle the competition, and preferably in such a way that usury became a moral crime, i.e., a sin for non-Jews.
Thus arises the legend of Christ, who allegedly cursed usurers, and thus became famous for fighting for the moral purity of the unwashed and oppressed, while the morally impure but rich Jews, with the help of this legend and at the legislative level eliminate their competitors and become monopolists in the financial business. At the same time Jews are not subject to Christian prohibitions, and Jewish law does not prohibit giving to non-Christians. Problem solved.
To get ahead of the possible objection that despite the prohibition (the First Council of Nicaea in 325 forbade clerics to engage in usury, which was equated with the sin of sodomy), Christian monasteries were engaged in usury. Corruption, my friend, corruption. As a result of the crusades, the church became fabulously rich and began to revise the prohibitions against usury, allowing monasteries to lend at 10% interest while the Jews lent at 40% or more. You have to hand it to the church. The mental acrobatics to justify this new sin belongs to the most outstanding examples of brainwashing technology known as we speak.
As one famous Jew said, “Consciousness is determined by life.” (“Das Leben bestimmt das Bewußtsein.) and the spiritual leaders figured that out way before Karl Marx.
That is a powerful claim. Very interesting and helpful, thanks.Adam Green (Know More News on BitChute) doesn't discuss the usury angle, but has Jesus Christ as another of their creations but with the specific task of leading the sheep (geopolitically) into precisely the time we are experiencing now; a kind of 'armageddon', this nightmare dystopia etc, where the Christ role will be reversed becoming the redeemed and heroic 'Judas Goat' leading the (goy) sheep to ultimate destruction and slaughter.i.e. we don't need Roman provenance.I admit that I hate to believe all this kind of data, but I also know that they are the real facts of our precarious situation.And don't they also seem to love sodomy as much as they love usury?Replies: @folkvangr
There was an urgent need to stifle the competition, and preferably in such a way that usury became a moral crime, i.e., a sin for non-Jews. Thus arises the legend of Christ, who allegedly cursed usurers...
�
Beautifully put, but grossly understated in not mentioning post-war murder campaigns and their prominence as 'military police' and jewdiciary at the Nuremburg trials (a murder campaign, but relatively minor for numbers).
the minute the smoke cleared, hundreds of Jews went ‘over the top’ from their desks at the US Treasury, became instant US Army officers, and staffed the Army of Occupation.
�
Mulga Shows Us All The Sure Fire Way To Heaven–He’s Like Moses!
“These people are of the essence of Evil,….”
And here, u even capitalize the “evil,” which u obviously love soooo much as it means soooo much to u, making use of it in practically EVERY entry u make–ur ultimate argument by which u conquer.
But “good-evil” makes no sense, and philosophers and ethicists throughout hist. have attempted and failed to provide a criterion for it, but there is none that works in all situations–it’s totally SUBJECTIVE–a simple fact actually well-known in the discipline of ethics. “Good-evil” is fallacious and non-existent, but u need a make-shift, childish invention by which to label any opponent who refuses to agree w. u. And it’s why for u (and many others too), racism (another of ur favorite labels) is “evil,” when actually it is defined as a VIRTUE, that of LOYALTY to people, ancestors, and culture, which such loyalty u detest.
And WHAT actually is the real source of this obsession of urs w. child’s, non-existent “good-evil”?–it could ONLY be some massive, overwhelming inferiority-complex which u feel sooooo sincerely, as now u sense the urge to compensate by means of denouncing such “evil” u insist upon seeing in everyone else compared to u.
And surely u imagine u, in God-like fashion, reify the concept (of “good-evil) by means of ur constant self-righteousness and use of the non-existent concept(s), “good-evil”–which is actual SATANISM, u now rivaling God for ur ability to so create something which otherwise doesn’t exist and which u cannot even define.
And the same general critique goes for the idea of a perfectly “free” human will–just more SATANISM–by which u achieve Godliness and the ability to create out of nothing. And what then about the idea that such “good-evil” doesn’t exist as there’s no real meaning behind it?–well, that’s “evil” too, right?–how clever, and how brilliantly u have everything figured out, all ur bases covered. U’re not only blessed w. virtue, but u’re a genius on top of all that. And when u get to the pearly gates of Heaven where St. Peter awaits, he’ll surely give u a cigar for all that great virtue u’re bursting and stinking with, how nice and touching–for a child.
But that’s precisely where Central Bank Digital Currency and the ‘666’ Chip-in-the-Hand, -Brain come into play.
It won’t matter no way wot color you iz, bro!
Lol. Not U.S.A., but it seems to be a zombie mad-house. I only recently watched the 1990 remake of Night of the Living Dead, knowing the original well, easy to see the introduction of ‘narrative’. Romero and his fellows just made a cheap film well.
Having watched the 1990 remake twice lately, to list the revisionist elements would take too long. However, and from the heart, Happy New Year.
Good comment. I often question what the ultimate endgame could be for the Jewish elites in their constant demonization of whites. It is only a matter of time till the chickens come home to roost because blacks in general do not look at jews any different from whites and the ones that do, specifically hate jews even more. So, as our (white) population dwindles and our collective power and influence wanes, the chance of jews becoming victims of the monster they’re creating will only increase. I can only attribute this reckless strategy to extreme hubris. They likely believe (and I think falsely) that they can use their power over the media to condition blacks to differentiate between jews and whites. I believe it’s too late and try as they might I don’t think they can convince the black people they’ve brainwashed to refrain from taking out their anger and resentment on them along with us. All they see at this point is another white face who they believe is responsible for every evil in the world. Not all blacks have fallen for this manipulation admittedly but most certainly have and it only seems to be escalating. Simply put, some resentful, angry black dude who wants to mug some random “privileged” white face isn’t going to stop and ask if that white face is jewish.
No.
Rejecting historic Christianity means being ruled by the Synagogue of Satan.
�
Sounds interesting. Tell me more.
I have one bulletproof argument to support that claim. If you are interested, let me know.Replies: @Psychotic Break
Christianity. Originated from Jews.
�
Go on. I dare you to tell!
Quite. The ‘soft machines’ are inherently unreliable, so our Masters, like the lunatic Schwab and his golem Noah Yuval Hariri, are planning a ‘transhuman’ future for themselves, WITHOUT the ‘useless classes’ that they despise. CoViD19 and the mRNA death-shots are the means to the exterminationist end. I must say people ought not be surprised. These people are of the essence of Evil, and have stated for decades that massive depopulation was their aim, and here it is. Perhaps Mother Gaia will then dispense with them, before they escape into the cosmos.
And here, u even capitalize the "evil," which u obviously love soooo much as it means soooo much to u, making use of it in practically EVERY entry u make--ur ultimate argument by which u conquer.
"These people are of the essence of Evil,...."
�
And the ideology of German Nazism followed the same template. Transference between the Zionazis and Nazis, before and after the Judeocide, in behaviour and psychology, is undeniable but inadmissable.
How can an anti-Synagogue of Satan religion that was naturally consist with the evolution of human morality have originated from a hidebound, set in stone religion that was hopelessly warped, hypocritical, and stagnant by the time of Christ? Like the Chinese practice of foot binding? You might just as well say "the Homo-sapium originated from the cromagnum man, therefore we owe the cromagnum man everything."Sounds like Zionist "logic" to me, that Judaism is Christianity's father or big brother. Was the reputedly half-Roman Jesus who rejected hidebound, corrupt, greedy and murderously seething Judaism "the son of the Jews" or the son of something else, perhaps even god?If you believe in anything related to the spiritual power of the cosmos or karma, you have to allow the possibility.Cynical, hyper-materialistic, hidebound Zionist reptiles are like the lizard sunning on a rock and lapping flies -- forever.Replies: @zumbuddi, @folkvangr
Christianity. Originated from Jews.
�
Christianity. Originated from Jews.
I have one bulletproof argument to support that claim. If you are interested, let me know.
messiah ben joseph is Jewsus (scapegoat function)… the “second coming” as messiah ben david (aka Yeshua/Yahshua) the adversary ( to accuse the goy in the Divine Council/Court) … https://www.thedivinecouncil.com/ https://archive.org/details/TheGreatAngel
to slaughter all the goy as per their book of predictive programming fantasies… the book is nothing but the “dreams” of the so called “holy” “patriarchs” for you to swallow the inception as sheep and “believe” … all Dialectical psyop… the bible is not the word of any “creator” of the universe, it is the written down dreams, similar to the “automatic writing’s” of modern clairvoyants claiming “download’s” from “angel’s” (ie. so called messenger’s of god) …. what/which god/egregore/tulpa may I ask? … ain’t my god!! not my “lord” (https://biblehub.com/greek/2962.htm) but if you want to be the so called anointed global monarch’s slave, er “servant” by all means continue to be a sheep slave, no one is stopping you… (https://biblehub.com/greek/1401.htm) –> see Psalms 82:6 and https://www.thedivinecouncil.com/ for kosher disclosure…
…truth … see Jefferson’s astute observation on monarchy as paraphrased by Dr. John Devanny, PhD. ::
“ The story of the American [global] political order, at least to this point, is the collapse of the influence and autonomy of the local into a consolidated [global] political and financial order, what Jefferson’s people called monarchy. This order is not merely political, it includes cultural, social, RELIGIOUS, and political mores and habits national [strike ‘national” …global] in their scope and often emanating from institutions closely aligned with the centers of [globalist] political and economic power.” ~ https://www.abbevilleinstitute.org/poison-under-the-wings/
See also related to Jefferson’s and LAURENT GUYÉNOT”s observation: https://www.unz.com/article/israel-as-one-man/
I get where this is coming from (as a Christian believer), but Jesus (according to Christian teaching) is both man and God. Thus, as a man of flesh and blood, he must have an ethnicity.
Jesus was not Jewish, or any other ethnicity: He couldn’t possibly be.
He was Son of God.
Why would God make His son a Jew, or Armenian, or Russian, or Italian, or Philistine,….
Isn’t that so?
�
{Thus, as a man of flesh and blood, he must have an ethnicity.}
Why?
God wanted his Son to appear amongst humans – for some reason.
As such, He gave His Son human appearance.
So, as I see it, why should Jesus have any ethnicity.
People amongst whom He appeared in human form could have said “….he is Jewish, he is Armenian, he is Klingon…..”.
Even the story of Virgin Mary being supposedly Jewish*, makes no difference.
Why? Because Jesus is not human: He has no human DNA, thus no DNA from Virgin Mary.
God used Virgin Mary as “vehicle” to “introduce” His Son to humans: to make it more acceptable to mere mortals.
At least, that’s the way I (logically) see it.
_______________________________
* One thing is sure: Jews were/are highly educated and intelligent.
Jewish writers wrote that Virgin Mary was Jewish: nobody knows in actuality.
It’s whoever wrote about it first and relentlessly promulgated the “fact”.
Who is this God you, Avery, speak of?
If you (generic you) believe in God, and believe that God created all things,
�
{Be precise.}
No, thank you.
“Jews are now at or near the peak of their power, but the peak, by definition, immediately precedes the fall. And given the circumstances, the fall will likely be precipitous. ”
That’s wishful thinking. Many aristocracies go on for centuries. One may analyze and conclude that Jewish dominance is doomed to fail soon due to this reason or that, but simply asserting that it will naturally follow some kind of quickly peaking then falling off curve doesn’t qualify as a compelling argument.
Projection.txt
If you (generic you) believe in God, and believe that God created all things,
Who is this God you, Avery, speak of?
Be precise.
God Zeus?
God Jupiter?
God Ra?
I’ve always found it interesting what Moses (the founder of Judaism) did to the grifter sect of Joseph’s people, once he was safely out of reach of Pharaoh’s armies, for their treachery. First he argued they were his kin, then when he saw how evil they were, he killed them.
Gentiles have been conditioned to accept a way of life contrary to their best interests.
Where did you learn that
I thought it was common knowledge that even many Jews acknowledge. Judaism was originally not monotheistic. Even today, it can hardly be called one. What sort of Universal God ignores 99.9% of the human race?
The Jewish god is a tribal god pretending to be a universal God.
No it didn't.
Christianity. Originated from Jews.
�
Jesus was not Jewish, or any other ethnicity: He couldn’t possibly be.
He was Son of God.
Why would God make His son a Jew, or Armenian, or Russian, or Italian, or Philistine,….
Isn’t that so?
I get where this is coming from (as a Christian believer), but Jesus (according to Christian teaching) is both man and God. Thus, as a man of flesh and blood, he must have an ethnicity.
But that ethnicity is NOT JEWISH, inasmuch as Jewish == Modern Rabbinic Judaism that adheres principally to the Talmud.
(And “Jewish” is also not really an ethnicity… there is no common culture among all Jews and no common racial profile. But try picking any one of them, and Jesus is not that either.)
Jesus was Judean, opposed to the Pharisees (from which modern Jews trace their origin), and possibly from the sect of the Essenes, or maybe no existing sect at all.
Modern Judaism is a branch of biblical (Pharisaic) Judaism codified in the 2nd to 3rd centuries with the Talmud. Arguably, it came after the founding of Christianity. The Talmud is to Judaism that the New Testament is to Christianity. Both are offshoot religions (that introduced new books). Islam as well.
But even if we are generous and say that modern Judaism traces its ancestry directly to a sect of biblical Judaism in an unbroken line (but evolved over the centuries), it would still have no direct relation to Christianity because they derive from different sects. Christianity did not come out of Pharisaic Judaism.
What’s more, as others have already stated, the Pharisaic sect comprised a mere 5% of ancient Judea.
you should read Maria Valtorta, you would have a better understanding of JC’s teachings, instead of your incomprehensible idiocies.
You don't need to remove them from a country.
How do you force Jews out of this world? Forced conversion? Space-ships? Mass murder? All that needs be done is to remove ALL private money from politics, prosecute ‘white collar’ crime properly, and make Israel subject to the ‘Rules Based International Order’. �
How do you get rid of something that is inconsistent with your survival as a country?
You start daily public broadcasts about Talmud and Judaism
You create special council to investigate crimes of talmudists since year 1 A.D.
You ban the Talmud and Judaism
You close places of worship
You demand reparations for all wars combined that have been proven to be financed by talmudic bankers
You prohibit members of the cult from holding public offices, teach, hold medical/legal/any professional licences
You close all banks that charge interest on their services and transform them into interest-free credit unions
These measures should force them out of the country en masse back to Ukraine and Poland from where most of them came here, but if nothing of the above works, there are still some nice atolls in the Pacific…lol
utter non-sense.
only the christians went to the lions, falsely accused by jews surrounding nero’s wife that they were responsible for the burning of Rome.
This is how bad it is, salad or pizza, whatever you call it, but if you insist, it’s untenable, sickening, humiliating, disgusting, treasonous, criminal, and life-threatening. The whole country has become a mob of sellouts to a hostile foreign ideology. lol
That is a very clever evaluation. I’d not heard it before. I have to 100% agree with you.
I’m not white. I say to you white people- Jew, Christian, Pagan, whatever. That you are narcissistic, overbearing, too loud for your numbers. A load, burden, and bother upon the Earth. I say this from a certain amount of good-will. Change is coming with or without your relief. We don’t care. We know you.
IOW: Just give us your civization, nations, wealth, belongings….without a word because we demand it and can’t create any of it for our selves.
That’s what you mean. Good luck! It’s going to be ugly for everyone.
Fascinating and insightful comment Ktulu; thanks.
But this gave me pause:
a monotheism is at a memetic advantage over the polytheisms it overthrew. Polytheisms are religious traditions created by ethnic groups bound by blood to understand the world and their place in it, and that is it.
I didn’t know much about “memetic” (vs. “mimetics” & the René Girard theories, which I’d studied earlier), so I explored both concepts.
I disagree with your assessment of polytheism as “at a disadvantage;” and as distinguished from monotheism in that polytheisms are “ethnic groups bound by blood.”
The topic here being Hebrew/Jewish monotheism, I prefer to distinguish monotheism — specifically, Abrahamism — from polytheism in that polytheists attach sacred significance to things in nature: Eli Ravage made snide reference to
“the spirits of the air, of the running streams and of the woodland. . . . your naked bodies. . . the tantalizing human figure. . . . the combats of the field, the arena and the battle-ground. . . . the hillsides and in the valleys of the great outdoors, you took to speculating on the wonder and mystery of life and laid the foundations of natural science and philosophy.”
Abrahamism, in contrast, is the product of the mind of Abraham.
In a preaching on the story of Abraham and the Idol Shop, Maimonides taught:
Abraham did not have a mentor, but was immersed amongst the stupid idolaters of Ur Casdim, where everyone, including his mother and father, served idols, as did he. In his heart, however, he continued to contemplate, until he realized the way of truth and understood the ways of righteousness from nature, and knew that there is a God who directs the spheres, created the world, and besides whom there is none other.
He also knew that the whole world was erring, and knew that what caused the mistake was that they [had] worshiped the stars and figures for so long that the truth had vanished. . . . he began to reason with the inhabitants of Ur Casdim and to argue with them, saying that by serving idols they were not following the way of truth.
He broke their images, and began to proclaim that it is not fitting to serve anyone other than God, . . . Abraham also proclaimed that it was fitting to break and destroy all the figures, so that nobody will err on account of them. http://learn.conservativeyeshiva.org/introduction-to-rabbinic-midrash-1-lesson-1-avraham-and-the-idol-shop/
Surely polytheists squabbled among themselves and played the “my god is better than your god” game, but an essential characteristic of the Roman system was that ALL gods were accepted and respected, even given a place in the Pantheon.
But Abraham insisted that the god-concept that emerged from his “contemplation” was the ONLY god worthy of respect; that all must be taught and corrected from the error of their ways; and that all other gods must be destroy.
I believe polytheisms have the advantage over Abrahamic monotheism, not least because they are based on observations of natural phenomenon (not on “blood bonds”).
Regarding the memetic/mimetic advantages of monotheism vs. polytheism:
Peter Thiel was a student and devotee of René Girard and his concept of mimesis
https://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/2016/08/02/mimesis-and-violence-part-1-peter-thiels-french-connection/
Thiel applied Girard’s notion that desire emerges from imitation to the then-new Facebook enterprise; invested in it, and profited handsomely. Facebook gains traction when Other people “LIKE” what is modeled by an initial FB poster, the LIKES create a market.
BUT CONSIDER how FB has evolved: FB’s owners now arrogate to themselves the right to determine what may be posted, therefore what is subject to LIKE. FB has become Abrahamic, not polytheistic.
Moreover, if my experience with my dumb-as-a-box-of-rocks brother-in-law can be generalized, individual FB pages/sites can be locked so that only those who AGREE with, or aggrandize the FB page owner are permitted to view it or to comment upon it.
Thiel has made his money and cashed out, but the mimetic value of Facebook is deeply flawed.
One hypothesis: Abrahamic monotheism, like the Facebook mime, has a strong need to be in control of what others think/do/say.
Polytheists, on the other hand, tend to behave in accord with Eli Ravage’s taunt:
“Disporting yourselves on the hillsides and in the valleys of the great outdoors, you took to speculating on the wonder and mystery of life and laid the foundations of natural science and philosophy.”
IIRC, in the 1600s Francis Bacon rejected the “authority of the Church and dogma” as the guarantor of the (syllogism’s) First Premise. Bacon held, rather, that one must gather observations of nature and reason from those observations the mechanisms that animate them. Bacon rejected Abrahamic-monotheistic control in favor of polytheistic examination and considerations.
And the world is better for it.
You may have made a good point, but did not with your indiscriminate word salad.
According to the Bible Jesus said: “I am not come but for the lost sheep of the House Of Israel.” Matt 15:24. Who are the true House of Israel? It doesn’t say.
What does one pure soul do to combat evil? Nothing … you do Nothing because Jesus (supposedly) said “do not resist evil” and “Pray for those who persecute you.” Do you know who persecutes pure souls the most? It’s your preachers and Christian leaders !! They will encourage wars and hatred against those the newspapers and media want you to hate. They will never bash or talk bad about Jews but they will pick your lives apart for simply living. The silly people in the pews will refer to this man as “their Pastor.” Their “pastor” keeps them blind and battered each and every week. They’ll tell you that Jesus is all you need to live and yet nearly all (Protestant) pastors marry young and have children. Sure makes them look like hypocrites … and nobody ever questions them.
The War of Northern Aggression was not about freeing the slaves (see the Corwin Amendment) it was about taxation. Lincoln wasn’t the “great emancipator” he was a segregationist and a tyrant, read his speeches. Lee was a true American patriot, protecting his state from the federal governments assault. First shots fired by the north- the Harriet Lane a tax collection schooner.
And "Christian" Zionists aren't just a corrupt, Satanic sect of Protestants, but include, for example, corrupt Satanic Catholics like Pelosi and Biden.
The problem isn’t Christianity, per se. The problem is Christian Zionists, who cuck for the Jewish Supremacist Agenda.
�
Agreed, but how deep does the corruption go? Can you name one national politician who doesn't cuck for the Satanic Jews?
We need to join forces with traditional xians to a) expose the Trojan horse of xian-Zionism and b) help us do battle against the nefarious and pernicious Jewish Supremacist Agenda. �
They are just setting up and moving the judaeo-chr-islam (Abrahamic) usury op monarchy under the new totalitarian CBDC BRIC’s system while they destroy their former host as they did Egypt before…
(messiah ben) Joseph: The Picture of an Economic Savior? (more like slavationism)
“Many see Joseph as an Old Testament picture of Christ. He suffered so that he might be able to save his family in Egypt; to go ahead and prepare a place for them. Much is also made of the fact that Joseph is the only character in the entire Bible besides Christ of which no character flaw or sin is explicitly mentioned. While this is true, Joseph was a sinner like every other human being. The only difference is that his sins and misdeeds are a little more hidden. In fact, through his errors, this great man of God like all the others from Abraham to King David can be seen to have bequeathed lessons to mankind that are very relevant for our day.
A closer examination of his life reveals that the results of his actions were not entirely virtuous. While it is true that he served to save many lives, his mission was not performed entirely in the spirit of a merciful rescue operation. In the end, he instituted an oppressive system of control over the people of Egypt. Egyptians had to virtually sell their souls and freedoms to gain access to food. With the exception of a few — mainly Egyptian priests, the immediate family of Joseph and probably other high-ranking elites — the entire land of Egypt came under the direct ownership of Pharaoh.
It is instructive to review how this all happened. When the famine first spread over the whole country, “Joseph opened the storehouses and sold grain to the Egyptians.” (Genesis 41: 56) Notice that he did not donate the grain to needy people, but instead required payment. Think of it. People were starving and he asked for money. Few Christian aid organizations today would think that they are fulfilling Christ’s command to “feed the poor”[2] if they were profiting from their ministries. Another aspect to notice is that “… all the countries came to Egypt to buy grain from Joseph, because the famine was severe in all the world.” (verse-57) Here in the first book of the Bible we find the very roots of modern-day “globalization.” The whole world converged together for reasons of “bread.” Egypt had become the world commercial center and its grain became the common currency. Pharaoh came to this position of controlling the entire world by dispensing the means of economic sustenance. Here we see that the incentive of gaining “bread” had been harnessed by one centralized system … even one man. This same process is sweeping the entire world today under the guise of “globalization” — the promise of bread for the entire world.”
In time, because the famine was so severe, Scripture tells us that Joseph collected all the money that was found in Egypt and Canaan. No doubt, he deposited the funds in Pharaoh’s coffers. He took every last penny in return for grain so that people might eat and be saved from the famine. What was the result? Now, the entire monetary system of that time was under his control.
Once all the monetary savings of the people had been used up, they then faced a cash-crunch. The famine continued yet they had no grain and no money. What to do next? They begged Joseph to give them food. What did Joseph do in response? He next took control of the nation’s industry. He demanded their livestock. “So they brought their livestock to Joseph, and he gave them food in exchange for their horses, their sheep and goats, their cattle and donkeys. And he brought them through that year with food in exchange for all their livestock.” (Genesis 47:17)
Now Joseph was in control of a large part of the capital stock of Egypt. For Pharaoh he now had secured the ownership of the land-based transportation system (donkeys and horses)and the productive capacity of factories … in other words, livestock. After all, in an agrarian society as existed during that time, livestock represented assets that generated food and a large part of household income. Now that Joseph had control of the key “factories” he could also now sell the outputs of milk and meat, as well as transportation services.
However, the takeover by the state didn’t stop there. The famine continued. People needed more grain and they became desperate. “Buy us and our land in exchange for food, and we with our land will be in bondage to Pharaoh,” they now said. (verse 19) So Joseph did exactly that. He completely reduced the people to servitude and all the land — from one end of Egyptto the other — became the property of the state and under the control of one man…” ~ Wilfred Hahn
"certainly" ? How could you be so sure ? 😃😊
The NT was certainly written in Greek, the lingua franca of the time.
�
It is a firm consensus of NT scholars that the Peshitta was translated FROM the original Greek into Aramaic in later centuries.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aramaic_original_New_Testament_theory
There is NO evidence of Aramaic originals, just claims.
Some Aramaic phrases did make it into the Greek NT, just like some Roman Latin phrases – but that does not mean it started as Aramaic, nor Latin.
My short rebuttal would be, “Kill Them Before They Kill You”.
That’s basically where we stand now as a species with International Jew Inc.
This could be interpreted metaphorically or literally, whatever gets us there.
Take the gloves off.
So they put a boy in a dress and put him/her/it in the window! So what?
Its cute to look at these Washington-based freaks on display as if it were all a symptom of a great decline of empire. The fact is that they are playing a much much cleverer game; and they are playing all of us (brilliantly):
https://www.rokfin.com/stream/27625/NATO–THE-UKRAINE-CONFLICT--2023-PREDICTIONS
https://www.rokfin.com/stream/27690/2022--EU-LEADERS-EXPOSED-AS-SUICIDAL-GUARD-DOGS-FOR-THE-US
{Jesus Christ was of the Essene sect, a minor jewish sect that espoused many Christian-like principles.}
Again: what you are telling me is what somebody wrote or allegedly wrote 2,000 years ago. Or a few centuries ago. To create or shape a narrative.
If you (generic you) believe in God, and believe that God created all things, including all peoples and all ethnicities, then the belief that Jesus, Son of God, belonged to some human sect is illogical and absurd.
Who is this God you, Avery, speak of?
If you (generic you) believe in God, and believe that God created all things,
�
You should write more.
White people want to be left alone. Tough to figure, huh?
The word Pagan is nothing more than the ancient equivalent of Redneck, and serves the same purpose. It evolved from the Latin word Pagani, which basically meant countryfolk. Christianity was originally an urban phenomenon, just like It’s modern equivalent “Wokism”. The urban environment detaches the human, either partially or wholly, from nature and breeds a human whose mind is susceptible to unnatural ideologies and ways of looking at the world. As long as we have cities and urbanized peoples humanity will continue to be assaulted by nonsense originating in the diseased minds of the artificial people created by these artificial environments.
Jews are probably descended from a population that was urbanized quite early in the history of sedentary life and are likely highly adapted for such environments.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/psychology/biopolitics
does biopolitics add anything to the substance of this thread?
how very Je... 'Christian' of youwhat, if you don't mind my asking, did 'Pagans' ever do to you?I can't say I'm a Pagan, (even as I respect the heritage and traditions of my ancestors, Pagan and Christian) but there are some things I do reject about Christianity, like original sin, and shame for being human and 'reveling in the flesh'. When I was young, I 'reveled in the flesh' (loved with an unbridled and unapologetic passion) - and those are some of my most cherished memories now that I'm in my sixties, and am more seasoned. 🎵 "Ain't no doubt about it, we were doubly blessed - cause we were barely seventeen and we were barely dressed" 🎶And it seems to me there are very many virtues in the Pagan traditions. Honor, love, strength, and so forth.
I spit on pagans.
�
Well, I don't see it. I see the accomplishments of Pagan Greece and Rome not as a consequence of Paganism or any religion per se, but rather of the blood of the Greeks and Romans who created those civilizations, just as I see the great accomplishment of Christendom and the beautiful Cathedrals and art, in a similar vein, as one of blood - the culture was a consequence and expression of the people's blood (genes/DNA) who created it. If Europe were to turn Hindu or Muslim or Jewish (or Pagan)- left unmolested by enemies- I'd fully expect the culture and accomplishments to soar to the heavens (or stars), regardless. It wasn't Paganism or Christianity that made the German race (to pick one in particular) great.It was the blood. And that's why the enemies of Christendom (Europa), are so fanatical about destroying the blood. Once the blood is destroyed (blended), the ((enemies)) of Christendom (Europa) won't care one whit what religion is imposed upon their mongrel slaves. The 'massive accomplishments" you speak of, and the towering Cathedrals and miracles of technology and art and so forth, could have only originated - in their unique form- in Europe. Just as Islam or Asian or Hindu or other great civilizations followed the paths of their respective blood. If you imposed (which is often how it gained ascendancy) Christianity upon Africa, you would still not get those particular "massive accomplishments", (at least in those forms) and I suspect that you know that. I don't say that to belittle the great people of Africa, it's just that they have their own blood, and their own great traditions and heritage, but it isn't ours (Europeans). And as European-descended peoples, we should (IMHO) respect and honor all our ancestors and traditions, including the Pagan ones, as they - are us. There is no need for such hostility to our Pagan heritage, or those who prefer to honor those traditions today in their own inoffensive way. I reject Pagans that condemn Christians, just as I reject Sunnis who condemn Shias, and vice-versa. Just as I reject Christians who condemn all Muslims- who condemn all Polytheism and so forth.Whether Hindu or Buddhism or whatever, a people generally create for themselves a spirituality that suits their better nature. The glaring exception is Zionist, Jewish supremacism, that makes war with all others. This, I do condemn, with my every breath. Jews who simply want to honor their traditions, as they honor their ancestors and heritage, are no problem to anyone. But it's when they forget this is the 21st century, and instead pay homage to the genocidal tribalism of the mud-pit of savagery that was those terrible times, that I do try to remind them, no good will come of it. Please don't hate the Pagans, Chris. They don't hate you. Love, at the end of the day, is the answer.Replies: @Chris Moore, @TheTrumanShow
...pagans are almost exactly like anti-Christ Jews: fanatics, psychopaths, pathological liars, eager to belittle Christian civilization and its massive accomplishments,..
�
Thanks, Rurik. Always like your stuff.
No.
Rejecting historic Christianity means being ruled by the Synagogue of Satan.
�
It means discovering Christian roots in the Greco-Roman west,
—And the People said, AMEN.
Where did you learn that — Protestant bible school where you made the face of god with macaroni and cotton balls?
I thought it was common knowledge that even many Jews acknowledge. Judaism was originally not monotheistic. Even today, it can hardly be called one. What sort of Universal God ignores 99.9% of the human race?
Where did you learn that
�
Jews are such malignant nihilists that they can’t help but to destroy the US, despite having gained hegemony over it. When their big plantation goes, so will go most of their power. Jews are now at or near the peak of their power, but the peak, by definition, immediately precedes the fall. And given the circumstances, the fall will likely be precipitous.
The commandment of love is the centre of Christianity. That is what I learned in a Catholic school when I was a kid. I took religion as a subject and our study concentrated on the New Testament.Our first introductory lessen, as I remember it to this day, dealt with the meaning of the words Gospel and Kerygma. Our teacher, Father Alexander, who mastered several languages was a consummate storyteller who made the Acts of the Apostles and the Three Missionary journeys extremely interesting.
At heart it’s a simple matter of the fact that they’ve been focused on advancing their interests over the course of many generations, while we haven’t. A critical sub-factor is that they also staunchly refuse to be made to feel guilty, while we don’t. Shaming us, and our allowing or encouraging of that has really put us on our heels. So, they’ve gradually gotten the better of us to the point that they now hold the whip hand.
Those are a lot of rules, structural punishment enacted and embedded that seems exactly like what the Jews do now to us. I don’t want to repeat the Khazarian/Jews. I want to evolve socially and in tandem biologically and for that to take place we must achieve the popular revolution that initiated and grew in the breast of capitalism.
Before we lose them these ordinary literate, technologically facile whpo cannot be employed and incorporated in the advancement of humanity must rise take over and driven by the demands of their need to survive create social organization to match the max employment of the stage focused on survival of humanity…what must be done with what we have, all that an be done and must be done to meet human global security which would set up the generations to follow.
What would that look like from nation tonation…rather from one natural tribal/cultural social unit to another the general need to secure and survive in a/heir location?
They no doubt would create real democracies and economies focused on the development of the security of the people. and all Forrinsrelations would also be disciplined by the same coordinates and matrix of similar forcusgloball as the stage is to to work by the people for the people. There would be no possible room forJewish Satanic and financial hell. and from there their could not possibly be an overturn and a return to previous times of Jewish constant and complete financial Jewish war on the people
And this would also see the final end for white elitism, and end to class society in the most practical way possible subsumed into urgent, practical, absolutely essential social organization that puts the people to work immediately in their interest, decided by them, organized by them effected and run by them as they go, the principle that drives everything is need to meet needs critical and we need to do soin must positive ways we are cpabeof at this point…and are free to improve as we discover more
No! To get rid of the Jews as a Satanic power is socially evolved into a nexe state of social organization that brings popular decision making front and, centre which focus of human activity human survival We need to do this because the previous/current stage can no longer meet human needs, has become anti human right at the time we have come to see so much of the why and the how of it, that we are actually on the verge of the best stage of human existence to date: That we have opened up the universe that’s brought hope not only our great potential as a species the endless universe but the both sides of that coin…the challenges inherent inherent to our existence
To survive indefinitely as a species we must come to know how to in the universe that endless, limitless, requires a vast expansion of human knowledge skill facility, technology that cannot be met my extreme financial minority whose strength of purpose is tookus on existential emotional weakness for financial gain while all else goes to waste. I Mean How Much can you eat then hoard? How much room remains in the world in which to hoard and hide wealth
No form of capitalism or dystopian derivative can meet anyway, indeed no form of top down structural, exploitative social organization can hope to address human evolutionary needs as the universes continues to open up and the truth and challenges we as a species in existence becomes endlessly clear
The Jews are passe’, at this stage a pointless tribe, which has brought human focus to the most disgusting, pornographic and wasteful focus imaginable… all for the purpose of protecting the Khazarian minority group interest which is as far from a proper human interest anyone or group can get to. The Khazarian/Jewish group are seeking to construct a social dystopia that would ensure they could keep all the wealth of the world forever they have stealthily, most evilly for so long now that they would ensure humanity as a collective dies a slow horriific torturous death in every way.
All exploitative relations are, with the truth we now have. Humanity needs to start looking after itself in the universe or else live a diminishing chance of survival as a species until we do…do or die.
The popular revolution is essential, That revolutionary potential is there, a product of all we have lived, done and accomplished so far. We don’t have to repeat the Khazars to surpass or move past them. We must enter into the life and full existential potential that all our struggles from the start have now made possible for us. We newwa whole, expanding fit, properly educated skillful human species going forward to achieve not a dystopia producing sexually dysfunctional morons thronging even greater perverts rolling in paper, gold. diamonds and gold
Ca. 1985 Doris Lessing did a series of lectures on the CBC entitled something like “Prisons We Choose to Live Inside.” She made the pt that we have all the info we need to avert disaster, and yet refuse to act on it.
As Freud stated, america was a gigantic mistake.
The “dispossession” of the Anglo-Americans is one of the most amazing revolutions. Nobody noticed until well after it had happened.
Stupids are urinating on the pages of History. They should be banished from living in the U,S,
Oops! I mistook Jung-Freud for Ann Coulter, whose name appears at the beginning of the article.
Shocked Ann would write this after 30 years of silence on the JQ. Well, better late than never. Thanks, Ann. Didn’t expect this.
Michelle Malkin is another leading figure on the Right who has dared to associate herself with criticism of Jews through her friendly relations with Nick Fuentes.
I wonder what Ann’s Jewish colleague David Cole at TakiMag thinks of this development.
Cole exposed the Auschwitz gas chamber hoax but recanted after supposedly getting a beat down by the JDL (Jewish Defense League).
Now he veers between accepting and rejecting criticism of Jews and clings to Holocaustianity. Not a comfortable place to be in.
If we could just get Tucker Carlson to say the J word …
Until we have a billionaire on our team who is willing to “go there” and support people like Coulter, Malkin and Carlson, business will continue as usual.
You don't need to remove them from a country.
How do you force Jews out of this world? Forced conversion? Space-ships? Mass murder? All that needs be done is to remove ALL private money from politics, prosecute ‘white collar’ crime properly, and make Israel subject to the ‘Rules Based International Order’. �
Jews return where they belong? Do you imagine they belong in Palestine and just need to exterminate all Semites there? Wrong! They belong everywhere and nowhere.
We drive the Jews from this planet by all major countries going officially BDS so the Jews leave “Israel” and Internet communications like UR replace Jewish control of the media, so the evils of Judaism are exposed to all including the ordinary Jews and the latter abandon Judaism.
Sorry but I have a full complete edition of the Gospels in Arameic writen by people who spoke and wrote in Arameic and knew the original versions of the Gospels.
The Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John were already in wide circulation by the middle of the second century particularly in Syria. They must therefore have been written earlier.
What is interesting about this version is that its editors not only knew the Aramaic originals but also the Greek translation.
Their Aramaic version corrects many of the errors in the Greek version, from which the modern English translation is derived, and restores the Gostels in all their freshness.
Rejecting historic Christianity means being ruled by the Synagogue of Satan.
No.
It means discovering Christian roots in the Greco-Roman west, where the character “Jesus” was stolen from in the first place.
Christ was seen as a Greed man-god long before there was any gospel or “church”. When our roots are known and fully accepted, the fraud of the Jewish god will be revealed and victory will be certain.
---And the People said, AMEN.
It means discovering Christian roots in the Greco-Roman west,
�
The German people are exhibit #1.
History says German people also have the shortest fuse. Maybe some change will happen when the cold winter starts fraying the tempers of the newly-arrived “enrichers”.
Sooner or later, something will happen.