');
The Unz Review •ï¿½An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library •ï¿½B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


�Remember My InformationWhy?
�Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Alastair Crooke Ambrose Kane Anatoly Karlin Andrew Anglin Andrew Joyce Audacious Epigone Boyd D. Cathey C.J. Hopkins E. Michael Jones Eric Margolis Eric Striker Fred Reed Gilad Atzmon Godfree Roberts Gregory Hood Guillaume Durocher Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir James Kirkpatrick James Thompson Jared Taylor John Derbyshire Jonathan Cook Jung-Freud Karlin Community Kevin Barrett Kevin MacDonald Lance Welton Larry Romanoff Laurent Guyénot Linh Dinh Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Kersey Pepe Escobar Peter Frost Philip Giraldi Razib Khan Ron Unz Steve Sailer The Saker Tobias Langdon A. Graham A. J. Smuskiewicz A Southerner Academic Research Group UK Staff Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Agha Hussain Ahmad Al Khaled Ahmet Öncü Alain De Benoist Alan Macleod Albemarle Man Alex Graham Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alexander Jacob Alexander Wolfheze Alfred McCoy Alison Weir Allan Wall Allegra Harpootlian Amalric De Droevig Amr Abozeid Anand Gopal Anastasia Katz Andre Damon Andre Vltchek Andreas Canetti Andrei Martyanov Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andrew Hamilton Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Napolitano Andrew S. Fischer Andy Kroll Angie Saxon Ann Jones Anna Tolstoyevskaya Anne Wilson Smith Anonymous Anonymous American Anonymous Attorney Anonymous Occidental Anthony Boehm Anthony Bryan Anthony DiMaggio Tony Hall Antiwar Staff Antonius Aquinas Antony C. Black Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor AudaciousEpigone Augustin Goland Austen Layard Ava Muhammad Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Kissin Barry Lando Barton Cockey Beau Albrecht Belle Chesler Ben Fountain Ben Freeman Ben Sullivan Benjamin Villaroel Bernard M. Smith Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Blake Archer Williams Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Book Brad Griffin Bradley Moore Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brett Wilkins Brian Dew Brian McGlinchey Brian R. Wright Brittany Smith C.D. Corax Cara Marianna Carl Boggs Carl Horowitz Carolyn Yeager Cat McGuire Catherine Crump César Keller Chalmers Johnson Chanda Chisala Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlie O'Neill Charlottesville Survivor Chase Madar Chauke Stephan Filho Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Chris Woltermann Christian Appy Christophe Dolbeau Christopher DeGroot Christopher Donovan Christopher Ketcham Chuck Spinney Civus Non Nequissimus CODOH Editors Coleen Rowley Colin Liddell Cooper Sterling Craig Murray Cynthia Chung D.F. Mulder Dahr Jamail Dakota Witness Dan E. Phillips Dan Roodt Dan Sanchez Daniel Barge Daniel McAdams Daniel Moscardi Daniel Vinyard Danny Sjursen Dave Chambers Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Boyajian David Bromwich David Chibo David Chu David Gordon David Haggith David Irving David L. McNaron David Lorimer David Martin David North David Stockman David Vine David Walsh David William Pear David Yorkshire Dean Baker Declan Hayes Dennis Dale Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Diego Ramos Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Dmitriy Kalyagin Donald Thoresen Alan Sabrosky Dr. Ejaz Akram Dr. Ridgely Abdul Mu’min Muhammad Dries Van Langenhove E. Frederick Stevens Eamonn Fingleton Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Edward Curtin Edward Dutton Egbert Dijkstra Egor Kholmogorov Ehud Shapiro Ekaterina Blinova Ellen Brown Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Emil Kirkegaard Emilio García Gómez Emma Goldman Enzo Porter Eric Draitser Eric Paulson Eric Peters Eric Rasmusen Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Gant Eugene Girin Eugene Kusmiak Eve Mykytyn F. Roger Devlin Fadi Abu Shammalah Fantine Gardinier Federale Fenster Fergus Hodgson Finian Cunningham The First Millennium Revisionist Fordham T. Smith Former Agent Forum Francis Goumain Frank Tipler Franklin Lamb Franklin Stahl Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Gary Corseri Gary Heavin Gary North Gary Younge Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Galloway George Koo George Mackenzie George Szamuely Georgianne Nienaber Gilbert Cavanaugh Gilbert Doctorow Giles Corey Glen K. Allen Glenn Greenwald A. Beaujean Agnostic Alex B. Amnestic Arcane Asher Bb Bbartlog Ben G Birch Barlow Canton ChairmanK Chrisg Coffee Mug Darth Quixote David David B David Boxenhorn DavidB Diana Dkane DMI Dobeln Duende Dylan Ericlien Fly Gcochran Godless Grady Herrick Jake & Kara Jason Collins Jason Malloy Jason�s Jeet Jemima Joel John Emerson John Quiggin JP Kele Kjmtchl Mark Martin Matoko Kusanagi Matt Matt McIntosh Michael Vassar Miko Ml Ole P-ter Piccolino Rosko Schizmatic Scorpius Suman TangoMan The Theresa Thorfinn Thrasymachus Wintz Gonzalo Lira Graham Seibert Grant M. Dahl Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Greg Klein Gregg Stanley Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Conte Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Gunnar Alfredsson Gustavo Arellano Hank Johnson Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Hans Vogel Harri Honkanen Heiner Rindermann Henry Cockburn Hewitt E. Moore Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Howe Abbot-Hiss Hua Bin Hubert Collins Hugh Kennedy Hugh McInnish Hugh Moriarty Hugo Dionísio Hunter DeRensis Hunter Wallace Huntley Haverstock Ian Fantom Ian Proud Igor Shafarevich Ira Chernus Irmin Vinson Ivan Kesić J. Alfred Powell J.B. Clark J.D. Gore J. Ricardo Martins Jacek Szela Jack Antonio Jack Dalton Jack Kerwick Jack Krak Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen Jake Bowyer James Bovard James Carroll James Carson Harrington James Chang James Dunphy James Durso James Edwards James Fulford James Gillespie James Hanna James J. O'Meara James K. Galbraith James Karlsson James Lawrence James Petras Jane Lazarre Jane Weir Janice Kortkamp Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Cannon Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jayant Bhandari JayMan Jean Bricmont Jean Marois Jean Ranc Jef Costello Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey D. Sachs Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jesse Mossman JHR Writers Jim Daniel Jim Fetzer Jim Goad Jim Kavanagh Jim Smith JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Dackman Joe Lauria Joel S. Hirschhorn Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Gorman John Harrison Sims John Helmer John Hill John Huss John J. Mearsheimer John Jackson John Kiriakou John Macdonald John Morgan John Patterson John Leonard John Pilger John Q. Publius John Rand John Reid John Ryan John Scales Avery John Siman John Stauber John T. Kelly John Taylor John Titus John Tremain John V. Walsh John Wear John Williams Jon Else Jon Entine Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Revusky Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Sawyer Jonathan Schell Jordan Henderson Jordan Steiner Jose Alberto Nino Joseph Kay Joseph Kishore Joseph Sobran Josephus Tiberius Josh Neal Jeshurun Tsarfat Juan Cole Judith Coburn Julian Bradford Julian Macfarlane K.J. Noh Kacey Gunther Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Karl Haemers Karl Nemmersdorf Karl Thorburn Kees Van Der Pijl Keith Woods Kelley Vlahos Kenn Gividen Kenneth Vinther Kerry Bolton Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin Folta Kevin Michael Grace Kevin Rothrock Kevin Sullivan Kevin Zeese Kit Klarenberg Kshama Sawant Larry C. Johnson Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Lawrence Erickson Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Leonard C. Goodman Leonard R. Jaffee Liam Cosgrove Lidia Misnik Lilith Powell Linda Preston Lipton Matthews Liv Heide Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett Louis Farrakhan Lydia Brimelow M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maciej Pieczyński Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marco De Wit Marcus Alethia Marcus Apostate Marcus Cicero Marcus Devonshire Margaret Flowers Margot Metroland Marian Evans Mark Allen Mark Bratchikov-Pogrebisskiy Mark Crispin Miller Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Gullick Mark H. Gaffney Mark Lu Mark O'Brien Mark Perry Mark Weber Marshall Yeats Martin Jay Martin K. O'Toole Martin Lichtmesz Martin Webster Martin Witkerk Mary Phagan-Kean Matt Cockerill Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Caldwell Matthew Ehret Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max Jones Max North Max Parry Max West Maya Schenwar Merlin Miller Metallicman Michael A. Roberts Michael Averko Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Hoffman Michael Masterson Michael Quinn Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Michelle Malkin Miko Peled Mnar Muhawesh Moon Landing Skeptic Morgan Jones Morris V. De Camp Mr. Anti-Humbug Muhammed Abu Murray Polner N. Joseph Potts Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Nathan Cofnas Nathan Doyle Ned Stark Neil Kumar Nelson Rosit Niall McCrae Nicholas R. Jeelvy Nicholas Stix Nick Griffin Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Nicolás Palacios Navarro Nils Van Der Vegte Noam Chomsky NOI Research Group Nomi Prins Norman Finkelstein Norman Solomon OldMicrobiologist Oliver Boyd-Barrett Oliver Williams Oscar Grau P.J. Collins Pádraic O'Bannon Patrice Greanville Patrick Armstrong Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Patrick Lawrence Patrick Martin Patrick McDermott Patrick Whittle Paul Bennett Paul Cochrane Paul De Rooij Paul Edwards Paul Engler Paul Gottfried Paul Larudee Paul Mitchell Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Paul Souvestre Paul Tripp Pedro De Alvarado Peter Baggins Ph.D. Peter Bradley Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Lee Peter Van Buren Philip Kraske Philip Weiss Pierre M. Sprey Pierre Simon Povl H. Riis-Knudsen Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Qasem Soleimani Rachel Marsden Raches Radhika Desai Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ralph Raico Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Ramzy Baroud Randy Shields Raul Diego Ray McGovern Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Reginald De Chantillon Rémi Tremblay Rev. Matthew Littlefield Ricardo Duchesne Richard Cook Richard Falk Richard Foley Richard Galustian Richard Houck Richard Hugus Richard Knight Richard Krushnic Richard McCulloch Richard Parker Richard Silverstein Richard Solomon Rick Shenkman Rick Sterling Rita Rozhkova Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Debrus Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Fisk Robert Hampton Robert Henderson Robert Inlakesh Robert LaFlamme Robert Lindsay Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Stark Robert Stevens Robert Trivers Robert Wallace Robert Weissberg Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Rolo Slavskiy Romana Rubeo Romanized Visigoth Ron Paul Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning RT Staff Ruuben Kaalep Ryan Andrews Ryan Dawson Sabri Öncü Salim Mansur Sam Dickson Sam Francis Sam Husseini Samuel Sequeira Sayed Hasan Scot Olmstead Scott Howard Scott Locklin Scott Ritter Servando Gonzalez Sharmine Narwani Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Sidney James Sietze Bosman Sigurd Kristensen Sinclair Jenkins Southfront Editor Spencer Davenport Spencer J. Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen F. Cohen Stephen J. Rossi Stephen J. Sniegoski Stephen Paul Foster Sterling Anderson Steve Fraser Steve Keen Steve Penfield Steven Farron Steven Yates Subhankar Banerjee Susan Southard Sydney Schanberg Talia Mullin Tanya Golash-Boza Taxi Taylor McClain Taylor Young Ted O'Keefe Ted Rall The Crew The Zman Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas A. Fudge Thomas Anderson Thomas Hales Thomas Dalton Thomas Ertl Thomas Frank Thomas Hales Thomas Jackson Thomas O. Meehan Thomas Steuben Thomas Zaja Thorsten J. Pattberg Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Timothy Vorgenss Timur Fomenko Tingba Muhammad Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Engelhardt Tom Mysiewicz Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Torin Murphy Tracy Rosenberg Travis LeBlanc Trevor Lynch Vernon Thorpe Virginia Dare Vito Klein Vladimir Brovkin Vladimir Putin Vladislav Krasnov Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walt King Walter E. Block Warren Balogh Washington Watcher Washington Watcher II Wayne Allensworth Wei Ling Chua Wesley Muhammad White Man Faculty Whitney Webb Wilhelm Kriessmann Wilhem Ivorsson Will Jones Will Offensicht William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Wyatt Peterson Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen Yaroslav Podvolotskiy Yvonne Lorenzo Zhores Medvedev
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2020 Election Academia American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Benjamin Netanyahu Black Crime Black Lives Matter Blacks Britain Censorship China China/America Conspiracy Theories Covid Culture/Society Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy Gaza Genocide Hamas History Holocaust Ideology Immigration IQ Iran Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Joe Biden NATO Nazi Germany Neocons Open Thread Political Correctness Race/Ethnicity Russia Science Ukraine Vladimir Putin World War II 汪精衛 100% Jussie-free Content 1984 2008 Election 2012 Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2022 Election 2024 Election 23andMe 9/11 Abortion Abraham Lincoln Abu Mehdi Muhandas Achievement Gap ACLU Acting White Adam Schiff Addiction ADL Admin Administration Admixture Adolf Hitler Advertising AfD Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Afrocentricism Age Age Of Malthusian Industrialism Agriculture AI AIPAC Air Force Aircraft Carriers Airlines Airports Al Jazeera Al Qaeda Al-Shifa Alain Soral Alan Clemmons Alan Dershowitz Albania Albert Einstein Albion's Seed Alcoholism Alejandro Mayorkas Alex Jones Alexander Dugin Alexander Vindman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Alexei Navalny Algeria Ali Dawabsheh Alien And Sedition Acts Alison Nathan Alt Right Altruism Amazon Amazon.com America America First American Civil War American Dream American History American Indians American Israel Public Affairs Committee American Jews American Left American Nations American Presidents American Prisons American Renaissance Amerindians Amish Amnesty Amnesty International Amos Hochstein Amy Klobuchar Amygdala Anarchism Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Greece Ancient Rome Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Bacevich Andrew Sullivan Andrew Yang Anglo-America Anglo-imperialism Anglo-Saxons Anglos Anglosphere Angola Animal IQ Animal Rights Wackos Animals Ann Coulter Anne Frank Anthony Blinken Anthony Fauci Anthrax Anthropology Anti-Defamation League Anti-Gentilism Anti-Semites Anti-Vaccination Anti-Vaxx Anti-white Animus Antifa Antifeminism Antiquity Antiracism Antisemitism Antisemitism Awareness Act Antisocial Behavior Antizionism Antony Blinken Apartheid Apartheid Israel Apollo's Ascent Appalachia Apple Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaeogenetics Archaeology Archaic DNA Architecture Arctic Arctic Sea Ice Melting Argentina Ariel Sharon Armageddon War Armenia Armenian Genocide Army Arnold Schwarzenegger Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Jensen Arthur Lichte Artificial Intelligence Arts/Letters Aryan Invasion Theory Aryans Aryeh Lightstone Ash Carter Ashkenazi Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians Assassination Assassinations Assimilation Atheism Atlanta AUMF Auschwitz Australia Australian Aboriginals Automation Avril Haines Ayn Rand Azerbaijan Azov Brigade Babes And Hunks Baby Gap Balfour Declaration Balkans Balochistan Baltics Baltimore Riots Banjamin Netanyahu Banking Industry Banking System Banks #BanTheADL Barack Obama Baseball Statistics Bashar Al-Assad Basketball #BasketOfDeplorables BBC BDS BDS Movement Beauty Beethoven Behavior Genetics Behavioral Genetics Bela Belarus Belgium Belgrade Embassy Bombing Ben Cardin Ben Rhodes Ben Shapiro Ben Stiller Benny Gantz Bernard Henri-Levy Bernie Sanders Betsy DeVos Betty McCollum Bezalel Smotrich Bezalel Yoel Smotrich Biden BigPost Bilateral Relations Bilingual Education Bill Clinton Bill De Blasio Bill Gates Bill Kristol Bill Maher Bill Of Rights Billionaires Billy Graham Bioethics Biology Bioweapons Birmingham Birth Rate Bitcoin Black Community Black History Month Black Muslims Black Panthers Black People Black Slavery BlackLivesMatter Blackmail BlackRock Blake Masters Blank Slatism BLM Blog Blogging Blogosphere Blond Hair Blood Libel Blue Eyes Boasian Anthropology Boeing Boers Bolshevik Revolution Bolshevik Russia Books Boomers Border Wall Boris Johnson Bosnia Boycott Divest And Sanction Brain Drain Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Bret Stephens Brett McGurk Bretton Woods Brexit Brezhnev Bri Brian Mast BRICs Brighter Brains British Empire British Labour Party British Politics Buddhism Build The Wall Bulldog Bush Business Byzantine Caitlin Johnstone California Californication Camp Of The Saints Canada Cancer Candace Owens Capitalism Carlos Slim Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Cars Carthaginians Catalonia Catholic Church Catholicism Catholics Cats Caucasus CCP CDC Ceasefire Cecil Rhodes Census Central Asia Central Intelligence Agency Chanda Chisala Chaos And Order Charles De Gaulle Charles Lindbergh Charles Manson Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charlie Hebdo Charlottesville ChatGPT Checheniest Chechen Of Them All Chechens Chechnya Chernobyl Chetty Chicago Chicagoization Chicken Hut Child Abuse Children Chile China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese IQ Chinese Language Christian Zionists Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Christopher Wray Chuck Schumer CIA Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil Rights Movement Civil War Civilization Clannishness Clash Of Civilizations Class Classical Antiquity Classical History Classical Music Clayton County Climate Climate Change Clint Eastwood Clintons Coal Coalition Of The Fringes Coen Brothers Cognitive Elitism Cognitive Science Cold Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Woodard College Admission College Football Colonialism Color Revolution Columbia University Columbus Comic Books Communism Computers Confederacy Confederate Flag Confucianism Congress Conquistador-American Conservatism Conservative Movement Conservatives Conspiracy Theory Constantinople Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumerism Controversial Book Convergence Core Article Corona Corporatism Corruption COTW Counterpunch Country Music Cousin Marriage Cover Story COVID-19 Craig Murray Creationism Crime Crimea Crispr Critical Race Theory Cruise Missiles Crusades Crying Among The Farmland Cryptocurrency Ctrl-Left Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckery Cuckservatism Cuckservative CUFI Cuisine Cultural Marxism Culture Culture War Curfew Czars Czech Republic DACA Daily Data Dump Dallas Shooting Damnatio Memoriae Dan Bilzarian Danny Danon Daren Acemoglu Darwinism Darya Dugina Data Data Analysis Dave Chappelle David Bazelon David Brog David Friedman David Frum David Irving David Lynch David Petraeus Davide Piffer Davos Death Of The West Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Deborah Lipstadt Debt Debt Jubilee Decadence Deep State DeepSeek Deficits Degeneracy Democracy Democratic Party Demograhics Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denmark Dennis Ross Department Of Education Department Of Homeland Security Deplatforming Derek Chauvin Detroit Development Dick Cheney Diet Digital Yuan Dinesh D'Souza Discrimination Disease Disinformation Disney Disparate Impact Disraeli Dissent Dissidence Diversity Diversity Before Diversity Diversity Pokemon Points Divorce DNA Dogs Dollar Domestic Surveillance Domestic Terrorism Doomsday Clock Dostoevsky Doug Emhoff Doug Feith Dresden Drone War Drones Drug Laws Drugs Duterte Dysgenic Dystopia E. Michael Jones E. O. Wilson East Asia East Asian Exception East Asians East Turkestan Eastern Europe Ebrahim Raisi Economic Development Economic History Economic Sanctions Economy Ecuador Edmund Burke Edmund Burke Foundation Education Edward Snowden Effective Altruism Effortpost Efraim Zurofff Egor Kholmogorov Egypt Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2020 Election Fraud Elections Electric Cars Eli Rosenbaum Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elise Stefanik Elites Elizabeth Holmes Elizabeth Warren Elliot Abrams Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emmanuel Macron Emmett Till Employment Energy England Entertainment Environment Environmentalism Epidemiology Equality Erdogan Eretz Israel Eric Zemmour Ernest Hemingway Espionage Espionage Act Estonia Ethics Ethics And Morals Ethiopia Ethnic Cleansing Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity Ethnocentricty EU Eugene Debs Eugenics Eurabia Eurasia Euro Europe European Genetics European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Genetics Evolutionary Psychology Existential Risks Eye Color Face Shape Facebook Faces Fake News False Flag Attack Family Fantasy FARA Farmers Fascism Fast Food FBI FDA FDD Federal Reserve Feminism Ferguson Ferguson Shooting Fermi Paradox Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Finland Finn Baiting First Amendment FISA Fitness Flash Mobs Flight From White Floyd Riots 2020 Fluctuarius Argenteus Flynn Effect Food Football For Fun Forecasts Foreign Agents Registration Act Foreign Aid Foreign Policy Fourth Amendment Fox News France Francesca Albanese Frank Salter Frankfurt School Franklin D. Roosevelt Franz Boas Fraud Freakonomics Fred Kagan Free Market Free Speech Free Trade Freedom Of Speech Freedom French Revolution Friedrich Karl Berger Friends Of The Israel Defense Forces Frivolty Frontlash Furkan Dogan Future Futurism G20 Gambling Game Game Of Thrones Gavin McInnes Gavin Newsom Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians GDP Gen Z Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Equality Gender Reassignment Gene-Culture Coevolution Genealogy General Intelligence General Motors Generation Z Generational Gap Genes Genetic Diversity Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Genghis Khan Genocide Convention Genomics Gentrification Geography Geopolitics George Floyd George Galloway George Patton George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush Georgia Germans Germany Ghislaine Maxwell Gilad Atzmon Gina Peddy Giorgia Meloni Gladwell Glenn Greenwald Global Warming Globalism Globalization Globo-Homo God Gold Golf Gonzalo Lira Google Government Government Debt Government Overreach Government Spending Government Surveillance Government Waste Goyim Grant Smith Graphs Great Bifurcation Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Powers Great Replacement Greece Greeks Greenland Greg Cochran Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Greta Thunberg Grooming Group Selection GSS Guardian Guest Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns GWAS Gypsies H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Haiti Hajnal Line Halloween HammerHate Hannibal Procedure Happening Happiness Harvard Harvard University Harvey Weinstein Hassan Nasrallah Hate Crimes Fraud Hoax Hate Hoaxes Hate Speech Hbd Hbd Chick Health Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Hegira Height Henry Harpending Henry Kissinger Heredity Heritability Hezbollah High Speed Rail Hillary Clinton Hindu Caste System Hindus Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanics Historical Genetics History Of Science Hitler HIV/AIDS Hoax Holland Hollywood Holocaust Denial Holocaust Deniers Holy Roman Empire Homelessness Homicide Homicide Rate Hominin Homomania Homosexuality Hong Kong Houellebecq Housing Houthis Howard Kohr Huawei Hubbert's Peak Huddled Masses Huey Newton Hug Thug Human Achievement Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Evolutionary Genetics Human Evolutionary Genomics Human Genetics Human Genomics Human Rights Human Rights Watch Humor Hungary Hunt For The Great White Defendant Hunter Biden Hunter-Gatherers I.F. Stone I.Q. I.Q. Genomics #IBelieveInHavenMonahan ICC Icj Ideas Identity Ideology And Worldview IDF Idiocracy Igbo Ilan Pappe Ilhan Omar Illegal Immigration Ilyushin IMF Impeachment Imperialism Imran Awan Inbreeding Income India Indian Indian IQ Indians Individualism Indo-Europeans Indonesia Inequality Inflation Intelligence Intelligence Agencies Intelligent Design International International Comparisons International Court Of Justice International Criminal Court International Relations Internet Interracial Marriage Interracism Intersectionality Intifada Intra-Racism Intraracism Invade Invite In Hock Invade The World Invite The World Iosef Stalin Iosif Stalin Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iranian Nuclear Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Irish Is Love Colorblind Isaac Herzog ISIS Islam Islamic Jihad Islamic State Islamism Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Bonds Israel Defense Force Israel Defense Forces Israel Separation Wall Israeli Occupation IT Italy Itamar Ben-Gvir It's Okay To Be White Ivanka Ivy League J Street Jacky Rosen Jair Bolsonaro Jake Sullivan Jake Tapper Jamal Khashoggi James Angleton James Clapper James Comey James Forrestal James Jeffrey James Mattis James Watson James Zogby Janet Yellen Janice Yellen Japan Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Greenblatt JASTA JCPOA JD Vance Jeb Bush Jeffrey Epstein Jeffrey Goldberg Jeffrey Sachs Jen Psaki Jennifer Rubin Jens Stoltenberg Jeremy Corbyn Jerry Seinfeld Jerusalem Jerusalem Post Jesuits Jesus Jesus Christ Jewish Genetics Jewish History Jewish Intellectuals Jewish Power Jewish Power Party Jewish Supremacism JFK Assassination JFK Jr. Jihadis Jill Stein Jimmy Carter Jingoism JINSA Joe Lieberman Joe Rogan John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John F. Kennedy John Hagee John Kirby John Kiriakou John McCain John McLaughlin John Mearsheimer Joker Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Greenblatt Jonathan Pollard Jordan Peterson Joseph McCarthy Josh Gottheimer Josh Paul Journalism Judaism Judea Judge George Daniels Judicial System Julian Assange Jussie Smollett Justice Justin Trudeau Kaboom Kahanists Kaiser Wilhelm Kamala Harris Kamala On Her Knees Kanye West Karabakh War 2020 Karen Kwiatkowski Karine Jean-Pierre Kash Patel Kashmir Kata'ib Hezbollah Kay Bailey Hutchison Kazakhstan Keir Starmer Kenneth Marcus Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Williamson Khazars Kids Kim Jong Un Kinship Kkk KKKrazy Glue Of The Coalition Of The Fringes Knesset Kompromat Korea Korean War Kosovo Kris Kobach Kristi Noem Ku Klux Klan Kubrick Kurds Kushner Foundation Kyle Rittenhouse Kyrie Irving Language Laos Larry C. Johnson Late Obama Age Collapse Latin America Latinos Laura Loomer Law Lawfare LDNR Lead Poisoning Leahy Amendments Leahy Law Lebanon Lee Kuan Yew Leftism Lenin Leo Frank Leo Strauss Let's Talk About My Hair LGBT LGBTI Liberal Opposition Liberal Whites Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libya Lindsey Graham Linguistics Literacy Literature Lithuania Litvinenko Living Standards Liz Cheney Liz Truss Lloyd Austin Localism long-range-missile-defense Longevity Looting Lord Of The Rings Lorde Los Angeles Loudoun County Louis Farrakhan Love And Marriage Low-fat Lukashenko Lula Lyndon B Johnson Lyndon Johnson Madeleine Albright Mafia MAGA Magnitsky Act Malaysia Malaysian Airlines MH17 Manosphere Manufacturing Mao Zedong Map Marco Rubio Maria Butina Marijuana Marine Le Pen Marjorie Taylor Greene Mark Milley Mark Steyn Mark Warner Marriage Martin Luther King Martin Scorsese Marvel Marx Marxism Masculinity Mass Shootings Mate Choice Mathematics Matt Gaetz Max Boot Max Weber Maxine Waters Mayans McCain McCain/POW McDonald's Meat Media Media Bias Medicine Medieval Christianity Medieval Russia Mediterranean Diet Medvedev Megan McCain Meghan Markle Mein Obama MEK Mel Gibson Men With Gold Chains Meng Wanzhou Mental Health Mental Illness Mental Traits Meritocracy Merkel Merkel Youth Merkel's Boner Merrick Garland Mexico MH 17 MI-6 Michael Bloomberg Michael Collins PIper Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Michael Jackson Michael Lind Michael McFaul Michael Moore Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michelle Goldberg Michelle Ma Belle Michelle Obama Microaggressions Middle Ages Middle East Migration Mike Huckabee Mike Johnson Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mike Waltz Mikhael Gorbachev Miles Mathis Militarized Police Military Military Analysis Military Budget Military History Military Spending Military Technology Millennials Milner Group Minimum Wage Minneapolis Minorities Minsk Accords Miriam Adelson Miscegenation Miscellaneous Misdreavus Mishima Missile Defense Mitch McConnell Mitt Romney Mixed-Race MK-Ultra Mohammed Bin Salman Monarchy Mondoweiss Money Mongolia Mongols Monkeypox Monogamy Moon Landing Hoax Moon Landings Moore's Law Morality Mormonism Mormons Mortality Mortgage Moscow Mossad Movies Muhammad Multiculturalism Music Muslim Ban Muslims Mussolini NAEP Naftali Bennett Nakba NAMs Nancy Pelos Nancy Pelosi Narendra Modi NASA Nation Of Hate Nation Of Islam National Assessment Of Educational Progress National Debt National Endowment For Democracy National Review National Security Strategy National Socialism National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans Natural Gas Nature Vs. Nurture Navalny Affair Navy Standards Nazis Nazism Neandertals Neanderthals Near Abroad Negrolatry Nehru Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolibs Neolithic Neoreaction Netherlands Never Again Education Act New Cold War New Dark Age New Horizon Foundation New Silk Road New Tes New World Order New York New York City New York Times New Zealand New Zealand Shooting NFL Nicholas II Nicholas Wade Nick Eberstadt Nick Fuentes Nicolas Maduro Niger Nigeria Nike Nikki Haley NIMBY Nina Jankowicz No Fly Zone Noam Chomsky Nobel Prize Nord Stream Nord Stream Pipelines Nordics Norman Braman Norman Finkelstein North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway Novorossiya NSA NSO Group Nuclear Power Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Nuremberg Nutrition NYPD Obama Obama Presidency Obamacare Obesity Obituary Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Wall Street October Surprise Oedipus Complex OFAC Oil Oil Industry Olav Scholz Old Testament Oliver Stone Olympics Open Borders OpenThread Opinion Poll Opioids Orban Organized Crime Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Orwell Osama Bin Laden OTFI Ottoman Empire Our Soldiers Speak Out Of Africa Model Paganism Pakistan Pakistani Palestine Palestinians Palin Pam Bondi Panhandling Papacy Paper Review Parasite Burden Parenting Parenting Paris Attacks Partly Inbred Extended Family Pat Buchanan Pathogens Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Findley Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Durov Pavel Grudinin Paypal Peak Oil Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Pentagon Personal Genomics Personality Pete Buttgieg Pete Hegseth Peter Frost Peter Thiel Peter Turchin Petro Poroshenko Pew Phil Rushton Philadelphia Philippines Philosophy Phoenicians Phyllis Randall Physiognomy Piers Morgan Pigmentation Pigs Piracy PISA Pizzagate POC Ascendancy Podcast Poetry Poland Police Police State Polio Political Correctness Makes You Stupid Political Dissolution Political Economy Politicians Politics Polling Pollution Polygamy Polygyny Pope Francis Population Population Genetics Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Porn Pornography Portland Portugal Portuguese Post-Apocalypse Poverty Power Pramila Jayapal PRC Prediction Prescription Drugs President Joe Biden Presidential Race '08 Presidential Race '12 Presidential Race '16 Presidential Race '20 Prince Andrew Prince Harry Princeton University Priti Patel Privacy Privatization Progressives Propaganda Prostitution protest Protestantism Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion Proud Boys Psychology Psychometrics Psychopathy Public Health Public Schools Puerto Rico Puritans Putin Putin Derangement Syndrome QAnon Qassem Soleimani Qatar Quantitative Genetics Quebec Quiet Skies Quincy Institute R2P Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race/IQ Race Riots Rachel Corrie Racial Purism Racial Reality Racialism Racism Rafah Raj Shah Rand Paul Randy Fine Rap Music Rape Rashida Tlaib Rationality Ray McGovern Raymond Chandler Razib Khan Real Estate RealWorld Recep Tayyip Erdogan Red Sea Refugee Crisis #refugeeswelcome Religion Religion And Philosophy Rentier Reparations Reprint Republican Party Republicans Review Revisionism Rex Tillerson RFK Assassination Ricci Richard Dawkins Richard Goldberg Richard Grenell Richard Haas Richard Haass Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Rightwing Cinema Riots R/k Theory RMAX Robert A. Heinlein Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Ford Robert Kagan Robert Kraft Robert Maxwell Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert O'Brien Robert Reich Robots Rock Music Roe Vs. Wade Roger Waters Rolling Stone Roman Empire Romania Romanticism Rome Ron DeSantis Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rotherham Rothschilds RT International Rudy Giuliani Rush Limbaugh Russiagate Russian Demography Russian Elections 2018 Russian History Russian Media Russian Military Russian Nationalism Russian Occupation Government Russian Orthodox Church Russian Reaction Russians Russophobes Russophobia Russotriumph Ruth Bader Ginsburg Rwanda Ryan Dawson Sabrina Rubin Erdely Sacha Baron Cohen Sacklers Sailer Strategy Sailer's First Law Of Female Journalism Saint Peter Tear Down This Gate! Saint-Petersburg Salman Rushie Salt Sam Altman Sam Bankman-Fried Sam Francis Samantha Power Samson Option San Bernadino Massacre Sandy Hook Sapir-Whorf SAT Satanic Age Satanism Saudi Arabia Scandal Science Denialism Science Fiction Scooter Libby Scotland Scott Ritter Scrabble Sean Hannity Seattle Secession Self Determination Self Indulgence Semites Serbia Sergei Lavrov Sergei Skripal Sergey Glazyev Seth Rich Sex Sex Differences Sexism Sexual Harassment Sexual Selection Sexuality Seymour Hersh Shai Masot Shakespeare Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shireen Abu Akleh Shmuley Boteach Shoah Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shulamit Aloni Shurat HaDin Sigal Mandelker Sigar Pearl Mandelker Sigmund Freud Silicon Valley Singapore Single Men Single Women Sinotriumph Six Day War Sixties SJWs Skin Color Slavery Slavery Reparations Slavoj Zizek Slavs Smart Fraction Social Justice Warriors Social Media Social Science Socialism Society Sociobiology Sociology Sodium Solzhenitsyn Somalia Sotomayor South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea Southeast Asia Soviet History Soviet Union Sovok Space Space Exploration Space Program Spain Spanish Spanish River High School SPLC Sport Sports Srebrenica St Petersburg International Economic Forum Stabby Somali Staffan Stage Stalinism Standardized Tests Star Trek Star Wars Starbucks Starvation Comparisons State Department Statistics Statue Of Liberty Steny Hoyer Stephen Cohen Stephen Harper Stephen Jay Gould Stereotypes Steroids Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steve Witkoff Steven Pinker Strait Of Hormuz Strategic Ambiguity Stuart Levey Stuart Seldowitz Student Debt Stuff White People Like Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subhas Chandra Bose Subprime Mortgage Crisis Suburb Suella Braverman Sugar Suicide Superintelligence Supreme Court Surveillance Susan Glasser Svidomy Sweden Switzerland Symington Amendment Syria Syrian Civil War Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Take Action Taliban Talmud Tariff Tatars Taxation Taxes Tea Party Technical Considerations Technology Ted Cruz Telegram Television Terrorism Terrorists Terry McAuliffe Tesla Testing Testosterone Tests Texas THAAD Thailand The AK The American Conservative The Bell Curve The Bible The Black Autumn The Cathedral The Confederacy The Constitution The Eight Banditos The Family The Free World The Great Awokening The Left The Middle East The New York Times The South The States The Zeroth Amendment To The Constitution Theranos Theresa May Third World Thomas Jefferson Thomas Massie Thomas Moorer Thought Crimes Tiananmen Massacre Tibet Tiger Mom TikTok TIMSS Tom Cotton Tom Massie Tom Wolfe Tony Blair Tony Blinken Tony Kleinfeld Too Many White People Torture Trade Trains Trans Fat Trans Fats Transgender Transgenderism Transhumanism Translation Translations Transportation Travel Trayvon Martin Treason Trolling True Redneck Stereotypes Trump Trump Derangement Syndrome Trust Tsarist Russia Tucker Carlson Tulsa Tulsi Gabbard Turkey Turks TWA 800 Twins Twitter Ucla UFOs UK Ukrainian Crisis UN Security Council Unbearable Whiteness Unemployment Unions United Kingdom United Nations United Nations General Assembly United Nations Security Council United States Universal Basic Income UNRWA Urbanization Ursula Von Der Leyen Uruguay US Blacks US Capitol Storming 2021 US Civil War II US Constitution US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 US Regionalism USA USAID USS Liberty USSR Uyghurs Uzbekistan Vaccination Vaccines Valdimir Putin Valerie Plame Vdare Venezuela Vibrancy Victoria Nuland Victorian England Video Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Vikings Viktor Orban Viktor Yanukovych Violence Vioxx Virginia Virginia Israel Advisory Board Vitamin D Vivek Ramaswamy Vladimir Zelensky Volodymur Zelenskyy Volodymyr Zelensky Vote Fraud Voter Fraud Voting Rights Voting Rights Act Vulcan Society Waffen SS Wall Street Walmart Wang Ching Wei Wang Jingwei War War Crimes War Guilt War In Donbass War On Christmas War On Terror War Powers War Powers Act Warhammer Washington DC WASPs Watergate Wealth Wealth Inequality Wealthy Web Traffic Weight WEIRDO Welfare Wendy Sherman West Bank Western Decline Western European Marriage Pattern Western Hypocrisy Western Media Western Religion Western Revival Westerns White America White Americans White Death White Flight White Guilt White Helmets White Liberals White Man's Burden White Nakba White Nationalism White Nationalists White People White Privilege White Slavery White Supremacy White Teachers Whiterpeople Whites Who Whom Whoopi Goldberg Wikileaks Wikipedia Wildfires William Browder William F. Buckley William Kristol William Latson William McGonagle William McRaven WINEP Winston Churchill Woke Capital Women Woodrow Wilson Workers Working Class World Bank World Economic Forum World Health Organization World Population World Values Survey World War G World War H World War Hair World War I World War III World War R World War T World War Weed WTF WVS WWII Xi Jinping Xinjiang Yahya Sinwar Yair Lapid Yemen Yevgeny Prigozhin Yoav Gallant Yogi Berra's Restaurant Yoram Hazony YouTube Yugoslavia Yuval Noah Harari Zbigniew Brzezinski Zimbabwe Zionism Zionists Zvika Fogel
Nothing found
All Commenters •ï¿½My
Comments
•ï¿½Followed
Commenters
�⇅All / On "Faces"
    “Point and splutter.†I think it was Steve Sailer who devised that term to describe a common tactic of the left. When leftists want to expose an academic or writer as a bad person who should lose his job and be driven out of respectable society, they don’t use facts, logic and reasoned argument. No,...
  • ”Nasty Nazi Nathan Cofnas”

    Cofnas is highly philo-semitic and most likely a crypto-Talmudic Jew

  • @anarchyst
    @Shiksas Love DV / DA

    How is life in you IDF unit 8200 sh!thole?
    I'll bet it's not too quiet as of late. Good!
    I'll bet that an Iranian missile will be sighted in on your HQ.
    Wait for the bang.
    lol

    Replies: @Shiksas Love DV / DA

    “How is life in you IDF unit 8200 sh!thole?”

    Wow. Do you kiss (or more likely fellate) your parish priest with that mouth? For shame!

    #TheWhoreOfBabylonLivesInRome

    The idiot mullahs of Iran are lucky to even sight the next goat for their afternoon rendezvous.

    And speaking of bangs (lol) . . . .

    #OperationGrimBeeper

    #HezbollahDeballed

    •ï¿½Troll: anarchyst
  • I’m hardly the first person to notice the obviously Jewish punim of (((Andrew Anglin))). There are whole videos about it! Here is just one:



    Video Link

  • @Shiksas Love DV / DA
    @anarchyst

    "Woody Allen is a scumbag jew child molester, marrying his adopted daughter."

    Now you're just lying (typical of an apologist for the Whore of Babylon "church" based in Rome).

    Woody Allen never molested anyone and he certainly didn't marry his adopted daughter like you claimed. He did marry the daughter of his nutjob ex-girlfriend. (Woody Allen neither married Ms. Farrow nor adopted Soon Yi Previn.) And the brilliant Mr. Allen is still happily married to Soon Yi! Wishing both Woody and Soon Yi a happy and sweet New Year! Shanah Tovah!!!!

    Replies: @anarchyst

    How is life in you IDF unit 8200 sh!thole?
    I’ll bet it’s not too quiet as of late. Good!
    I’ll bet that an Iranian missile will be sighted in on your HQ.
    Wait for the bang.
    lol

    •ï¿½Replies: @Shiksas Love DV / DA
    @anarchyst

    "How is life in you IDF unit 8200 sh!thole?"

    Wow. Do you kiss (or more likely fellate) your parish priest with that mouth? For shame!

    #TheWhoreOfBabylonLivesInRome


    The idiot mullahs of Iran are lucky to even sight the next goat for their afternoon rendezvous.

    And speaking of bangs (lol) . . . .

    #OperationGrimBeeper

    #HezbollahDeballed
  • @anarchyst
    @Wild Man

    Woody Allen a western treasure??

    You've got to be kidding.

    I never found anything Woody Allen produced as being anything more than juvenile claptrap, not worthy of merit and merely wasting of valuable time.

    Woody Allen is a scumbag jew child molester, marrying his adopted daughter.

    One cannot forget Roman Polansky, another jew who raped and sodomized a 13-year-old girl and escaped to Europe to avoid prosecution.

    Why was Polansky never extradited to the USA to face trial? Oops, I forgot, he's a JEW who can do whatever he wants to the "goyim".

    Your jew-love is disgusting.

    Replies: @xyzxy, @SomeDude, @Shiksas Love DV / DA

    “Woody Allen is a scumbag jew child molester, marrying his adopted daughter.”

    Now you’re just lying (typical of an apologist for the Whore of Babylon “church” based in Rome).

    Woody Allen never molested anyone and he certainly didn’t marry his adopted daughter like you claimed. He did marry the daughter of his nutjob ex-girlfriend. (Woody Allen neither married Ms. Farrow nor adopted Soon Yi Previn.) And the brilliant Mr. Allen is still happily married to Soon Yi! Wishing both Woody and Soon Yi a happy and sweet New Year! Shanah Tovah!!!!

    •ï¿½Troll: anarchyst
    •ï¿½Replies: @anarchyst
    @Shiksas Love DV / DA

    How is life in you IDF unit 8200 sh!thole?
    I'll bet it's not too quiet as of late. Good!
    I'll bet that an Iranian missile will be sighted in on your HQ.
    Wait for the bang.
    lol

    Replies: @Shiksas Love DV / DA
  • @Sandy Beach
    @mulga mumblebrain

    "just you wait till next time it's going to be different!" It's always next time and always excuses and always the armchair general.

    Anybody this arrogant has clearly never had a job or needed to produce anything, go play with your toy soldiers and imagine games while real people take the world.

    There will be that nuclear bomb from Pakistan because that's exactly what it reads in Revelations, but what you are confusing as a small country is actually the entire Western alliance. This is called "Israel" in the bible.

    Out with some more regurgitation and atheist scoffing, but the foxhole catches up to everyone eventually.

    Replies: @mulga mumblebrain

    Yes-the Judenreich IS the spearhead of the Western ‘Clash of Civilizations’ race and cultural war on the non-West, led by China. Western elites, and brainwashed and vicious cretins like YOU, are so deranged, in-bred and arrogant that they think that they can attack China, and win. And like most ‘Christian Zionazi’ slaves, you confuse the Torah with the Christian New Testament. The two are complete antitheses, and you are Judaic, never ‘Christian’. The arrogance and blood-lust says it all.

  • I found the first few paragraphs so tedious that I bailed out. Why does this article suck so bad?

  • King Edward I says: •ï¿½Website
    @Sandy Beach
    @mulga mumblebrain

    Meanwhile the globe continued spinning and billions of people lived and died over thousands of years everywhere. It's a fantasy of your mind because it's not even accurately described and it doesn't mean there's a giant group getting "expelled" from these places.

    Something happened in France at the aristocratic level of government with a small number of people but suddenly Persia magically popped into the picture 2000 miles away. Effortless bubble thinking

    Spain is a good example, considering about 100,000 people left during the Jewish expulsion out of several million Spanish Jews that were recorded in the previous centuries. Where did everybody go then who wasn't expelled? You have literally zero grasp of history It's more like playing with toy soldiers or board games.

    This is why all of your takes are always wrong, but it's hilarious so keep it up! Same as the Wogs, always making thousands of assumptions then all of a sudden they're surprised when the missiles hit them. It's because you live and believe in ideology instead of real-time facts, geometry and basic math.

    Replies: @King Edward I

    (((sandy))) says

    The Jews were never expelled from anywhere, just converted

    Then (((sandy))) says…

    Spain is a good example, considering about 100,000 people left during the Jewish expulsion

    First they were allegedly never expelled…then a few posts later, he inadvertently admits he was lying.

    Look shlomo, you are a pathological liar. Your lying rabbis and your lying parents likely fucked up your brain and made you the raving deceiver and hypocrite you are today. It’s not “funny”. It’s not “culture”. It’s sick and people tire of lying jews.

    Please shlomo, get help. Stop believing in the ethnic cult your gullible ancestors fell for. Do better shlomo. Drop the yahweh sky ghost cult….start being consistent, fair, and begin being honest.

    Abandon your ancestors and your tribe of liars and become a real human being. If enough of you do it, you can truly make the world a better place.

    I’m trying to help here.


    Video Link

  • King Edward I says: •ï¿½Website
    @Sandy Beach
    @King Edward I

    Thanks for sharing your giant mentally ill word salad as you have a nervous breakdown on the internet.

    Typical boomer

    Replies: @King Edward I

    I proved you wrong about the jewish expulsions shlomo. Revealing yet again that you are a liar, as in my experience, jews as a people are a group of liars.

    My people have known this for centuries. Your people are not to be trusted or believed….EVER.

    https://archive.org/details/Luther_201906#:~:text=The%20Jews%20and%20their%20lies.%20by.%20Luther,

    It is quite clear why you jews are constantly the ones demanding censorship. You post reveals the reason….you simply suck at debating real issues, and you cannot acknowledge the truth.

    You are allergic to truth.

    This is why “The jews and their lies” was removed by amazon. It is why “culture of critique” was removed by amazon. It is why “the myth of German villainy” was removed by amazon.

    Because YOU JEWS can’t stand the truth….and those truths you are too lazy to try to refute, or can’t refute, you demand those truths be censored and burned at the stake.

    Just the other day, I heard the jew john kerry insisting that (((democracy))) is too difficult when jews aren’t allowed to censor the truth.

    Your people are truly pathetic, authoritarian, dictatorial, and neurotic. People get really tired of your behavior. THIS is why your people have been targeted throughout history. …your awful behavior.

    As a wise man once said:
    anti semitism=is a goy reaction to bad jewish behavior

    •ï¿½Agree: HdC
    •ï¿½Thanks: anarchyst
  • Odyssey says:
    @Sandy Beach
    @Odyssey

    They were all white scythians, in short. German is what the Romans called these pure tribes ie "germane". The people from the Russian steppes were dispersed Hebrew Israelites from the northern house that was carried away in the times of Assyria. And those who left earlier, moving into Asia Minor.

    All of these "caucasians" (those who crossed north over the caucasus) and their ilk moved towards Western and Central Europe around the year 0 AD or thereafter. That's when the Romans started into contact with these newly arrived peoples in "Germania", and of course there's all kinds of other people let's say "Europeans" who were already present.

    Basically what professor Tolkien had in mind with the horse mounted "Rohirrim", notice the Hebrew plural that he also identified with "Haradrim". These proto saxons or Isaac's Sons are at the foundation of British and English speaking people everywhere today. That all goes back to ancient Scythia and Parthia

    Replies: @Odyssey

    Some really original stuff, I must admit.

    German is what the Romans called these pure tribes ie “Germans”.

    We haven’t heard anything like that even from Tulip (and especially not from Panzer D-doyen, HdC). I immediately had the feeling that the ‘Land of the Spearmen’ was a simple cork. This indirectly explains why Auschwitz had a swimming pool, a maternity ward, craft courses and football matches with the English national team.

    The people from the Russian steppes were dispersed Hebrew Israelites from the northern house that was carried away in the times of Assyria.

    WoW. This is really something. And I guessed that earlier when I said that there was a great similarity between panzers and Zionists, but I didn’t know where it came from. So, common ancestry. Very good.

    Before, I didn’t understand why football was played against the English national team until I saw the following:

    “These proto saxons or Isaac’s Sons are at the foundation of British and English speaking people everywhere today.”

    So, here we are. This is practically the answer to almost all our questions. I am sure that Tulip, Isaac’s (Ikey-Kikey), g.g-daughter, will also be satisfied, because anything is better than being a Serbian kin.

    After all, the kinship of Jews and Goths seems quite normal to me (and it also means that the Germans were really Goths, which I thought was a forgery).

    If you finally tell us the meaning of kike, which is now no longer a derogatory term only for Jews but also for panzers and all English-speaking people, then you have really done a great job and finally explained some issues that have been lingering here for months if not years.

  • @spidereyes
    Correct me if I am wrong - but isn't beauty in the eye of the beholder? Settle down guys. Peace.

    Replies: @Linus, @Bill

    You’re wrong.

  • @SomeDude
    @anarchyst


    Woody Allen is a scumbag jew child molester, marrying his adopted daughter.

    One cannot forget Roman Polansky, another jew who raped and sodomized a 13-year-old girl
    �
    Fair enough, although at least they were girls. And maybe look up the phrase 'double standard', as there are cultures throughout the world--Islamic culture in particular--in which a 13-year-old girl is actually past her prime.

    Be that as it may, Catholicism basically exists as a cover for grown men to ass-fuck young boys.

    I realize you hate jews, but the Catholics are peerless when it comes to sexual depravity.

    Replies: @anarchyst

    The jew-owned “mainstream media†licked its chops when a small cabal of homosexual pedophilic priests was exposed within the Roman Catholic Church.
    Although the number was small (but still reprehensible to say the least), the jew-owned “mainstream media†utilized its power to slander ALL Catholic clergy, and by inference, the Roman Catholic Church itself. This falls in line with the jewish belief in “collective responsibilityâ€.
    This same mainstream media conveniently left out the much greater homosexual pedophilia problem within Protestant denominations and its own problems with homosexual pedophilia rabbis within judaism. One only has to observe the recently discovered child sacrifice “tunnels†under NYC synagogues. Despite clear evidence of child sacrifices going on (blood-stained child-size mattresses, toddler high-chairs and other child-size items) NYC officials decided to destroy evidence of jewish child-sacrifices rather than preserve criminal evidence.
    In fact, there is much more homosexual pedophilia behavior within Protestantism and judaism than there ever was in the Roman Catholic Church.
    The jew-owned “mainstream media†used its own “play on words†to avoid blaming homosexual pedophilia supporters by calling their criminal behavior “minor sex abuse†rather than the sordid criminal homosexual grooming behavior that it truly is. The “mainstream media†went out if its way to avoid calling this sordid criminal behavior by its true definition–homosexual pedophilia grooming.
    It is judaism’s eternal hatred of the Roman Catholic Church and Christianity that fuels the constant defamation of Catholicism and Christianity.
    If only Christians would disavow their support of zionism and judaism and recognize the extreme hatred that jews have for Roman Catholicism and Christianity, this would be a much better world…

    •ï¿½Agree: HdC
  • @King Edward I
    @Sandy Beach


    The Jews were never expelled from anywhere, just converted. You made the whole thing up in your mind, it’s obviously wrong.
    �
    My god you fake jews are so ignorant about your real history. Let me help you out here, shlomo.

    1. Ashkenazi jews are not really jews at all. Your female line comes from White gentile European women and not semitic women.
    https://www.livescience.com/40247-ashkenazi-jews-have-european-genes.html

    2. Your jewish priests are pathological liars. They lied about jewish "history".
    a. The exodus tale is a LIE. jews were never slaves in Egypt. You need to apologize to Egyptians for spreading blood libels against them.
    b. The esther/Haman story is a lie. It is ahistorical. It never happened.
    c. The judith story is a lie. It is ahistorical. It never happened.

    3. fake jews (ashkenazis) have indeed been expelled over 1,000 times. Why? Well, your jewish priests lie about that too. Fake jews have been expelled BECAUSE jews always push a jews-first agenda, even when that agenda harms their host people. It's about jewish bad behaviors.
    https://archive.org/details/the-complete-list-of-the-one-thousand-and-thirty-jewish-expulsions-in-human-history/page/n3/mode/2up

    I'm wondering shlomo. Do you think you are being "tricky" like jacob deceiving Esau by lying to me and others about jewish expulsions? Why do so many of your people relish in telling absolute lies about things. You know dishonesty ranks right up there in the list of why jews have been expelled from so many places. So why can't you stop lying and act like a normal, honorable, honest people?

    ROFL....even Native Americans in Guatemala expelled your people for their rotten, selfish behavior.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-28992743#:~:text=Some%20230%20members%20of%20an%20Orthodox%20Jewish

    Replies: @Sandy Beach

    Thanks for sharing your giant mentally ill word salad as you have a nervous breakdown on the internet.

    Typical boomer

    •ï¿½Replies: @King Edward I
    @Sandy Beach

    I proved you wrong about the jewish expulsions shlomo. Revealing yet again that you are a liar, as in my experience, jews as a people are a group of liars.

    My people have known this for centuries. Your people are not to be trusted or believed....EVER.

    https://archive.org/details/Luther_201906#:~:text=The%20Jews%20and%20their%20lies.%20by.%20Luther,

    It is quite clear why you jews are constantly the ones demanding censorship. You post reveals the reason....you simply suck at debating real issues, and you cannot acknowledge the truth.

    You are allergic to truth.

    This is why "The jews and their lies" was removed by amazon. It is why "culture of critique" was removed by amazon. It is why "the myth of German villainy" was removed by amazon.

    Because YOU JEWS can't stand the truth....and those truths you are too lazy to try to refute, or can't refute, you demand those truths be censored and burned at the stake.

    Just the other day, I heard the jew john kerry insisting that (((democracy))) is too difficult when jews aren't allowed to censor the truth.

    Your people are truly pathetic, authoritarian, dictatorial, and neurotic. People get really tired of your behavior. THIS is why your people have been targeted throughout history. ...your awful behavior.

    As a wise man once said:
    anti semitism=is a goy reaction to bad jewish behavior
  • @Odyssey
    Those who write about the Nordic features probably do not know where from (and when) the 'Nordics' came to Scandinavia. Those who think that Germans are Nordics are also wrong.

    The typical 'German look' comes from the Prussians who are not Germanics, because they are Europeans and the (original) Germans (no one knows what they were called before coming to Europe) are Asians, who came and took the land from the natives and assimilated many of them.

    It would be interesting if someone could describe what the Germans (aka proto-panzers who still don't know the meaning of their European name) looked like when they arrived in Europe, as well as whether the nomads, ancestors of the modern Westerners who came from the Russian steppes, were white. Please add this dilemma to the previous three topics I proposed for discussion.

    Replies: @Mosafer Hastam, @Sandy Beach

    They were all white scythians, in short. German is what the Romans called these pure tribes ie “germane”. The people from the Russian steppes were dispersed Hebrew Israelites from the northern house that was carried away in the times of Assyria. And those who left earlier, moving into Asia Minor.

    All of these “caucasians” (those who crossed north over the caucasus) and their ilk moved towards Western and Central Europe around the year 0 AD or thereafter. That’s when the Romans started into contact with these newly arrived peoples in “Germania”, and of course there’s all kinds of other people let’s say “Europeans” who were already present.

    Basically what professor Tolkien had in mind with the horse mounted “Rohirrim”, notice the Hebrew plural that he also identified with “Haradrim”. These proto saxons or Isaac’s Sons are at the foundation of British and English speaking people everywhere today. That all goes back to ancient Scythia and Parthia

    •ï¿½Replies: @Odyssey
    @Sandy Beach

    Some really original stuff, I must admit.

    German is what the Romans called these pure tribes ie "Germans".
    �
    We haven't heard anything like that even from Tulip (and especially not from Panzer D-doyen, HdC). I immediately had the feeling that the 'Land of the Spearmen' was a simple cork. This indirectly explains why Auschwitz had a swimming pool, a maternity ward, craft courses and football matches with the English national team.

    The people from the Russian steppes were dispersed Hebrew Israelites from the northern house that was carried away in the times of Assyria.
    �
    WoW. This is really something. And I guessed that earlier when I said that there was a great similarity between panzers and Zionists, but I didn't know where it came from. So, common ancestry. Very good.

    Before, I didn't understand why football was played against the English national team until I saw the following:

    "These proto saxons or Isaac's Sons are at the foundation of British and English speaking people everywhere today."

    So, here we are. This is practically the answer to almost all our questions. I am sure that Tulip, Isaac's (Ikey-Kikey), g.g-daughter, will also be satisfied, because anything is better than being a Serbian kin.

    After all, the kinship of Jews and Goths seems quite normal to me (and it also means that the Germans were really Goths, which I thought was a forgery).

    If you finally tell us the meaning of kike, which is now no longer a derogatory term only for Jews but also for panzers and all English-speaking people, then you have really done a great job and finally explained some issues that have been lingering here for months if not years.
  • @anarchyst
    @Wild Man

    Woody Allen a western treasure??

    You've got to be kidding.

    I never found anything Woody Allen produced as being anything more than juvenile claptrap, not worthy of merit and merely wasting of valuable time.

    Woody Allen is a scumbag jew child molester, marrying his adopted daughter.

    One cannot forget Roman Polansky, another jew who raped and sodomized a 13-year-old girl and escaped to Europe to avoid prosecution.

    Why was Polansky never extradited to the USA to face trial? Oops, I forgot, he's a JEW who can do whatever he wants to the "goyim".

    Your jew-love is disgusting.

    Replies: @xyzxy, @SomeDude, @Shiksas Love DV / DA

    Woody Allen is a scumbag jew child molester, marrying his adopted daughter.

    One cannot forget Roman Polansky, another jew who raped and sodomized a 13-year-old girl

    Fair enough, although at least they were girls. And maybe look up the phrase ‘double standard’, as there are cultures throughout the world–Islamic culture in particular–in which a 13-year-old girl is actually past her prime.

    Be that as it may, Catholicism basically exists as a cover for grown men to ass-fuck young boys.

    I realize you hate jews, but the Catholics are peerless when it comes to sexual depravity.

    •ï¿½Replies: @anarchyst
    @SomeDude

    The jew-owned “mainstream media†licked its chops when a small cabal of homosexual pedophilic priests was exposed within the Roman Catholic Church.
    Although the number was small (but still reprehensible to say the least), the jew-owned “mainstream media†utilized its power to slander ALL Catholic clergy, and by inference, the Roman Catholic Church itself. This falls in line with the jewish belief in “collective responsibilityâ€.
    This same mainstream media conveniently left out the much greater homosexual pedophilia problem within Protestant denominations and its own problems with homosexual pedophilia rabbis within judaism. One only has to observe the recently discovered child sacrifice “tunnels†under NYC synagogues. Despite clear evidence of child sacrifices going on (blood-stained child-size mattresses, toddler high-chairs and other child-size items) NYC officials decided to destroy evidence of jewish child-sacrifices rather than preserve criminal evidence.
    In fact, there is much more homosexual pedophilia behavior within Protestantism and judaism than there ever was in the Roman Catholic Church.
    The jew-owned “mainstream media†used its own “play on words†to avoid blaming homosexual pedophilia supporters by calling their criminal behavior “minor sex abuse†rather than the sordid criminal homosexual grooming behavior that it truly is. The “mainstream media†went out if its way to avoid calling this sordid criminal behavior by its true definition–homosexual pedophilia grooming.
    It is judaism’s eternal hatred of the Roman Catholic Church and Christianity that fuels the constant defamation of Catholicism and Christianity.
    If only Christians would disavow their support of zionism and judaism and recognize the extreme hatred that jews have for Roman Catholicism and Christianity, this would be a much better world...
  • Mock the face of victory all you want.

    You still lost the game.

    From that perspective, your Barbie doll blondes are just cows.

    Cows that castrate your children.

  • I’m glad no paper was wasted on this effort. That last bitch is fine.

  • @Sandy Beach
    @King Edward I

    The Jews were never expelled from anywhere, just converted. You made the whole thing up in your mind, it's obviously wrong. The point is that Jewish elements are at the foundation of France, Spain, Northern and Southern Italy, and of course Poland and Hungary besides Austria.

    There are literal lines of Jewish kings in Austria and Hungary, the word could mean practically anything. There was a time when Celtic and Gothic tribes were called "Jews". Again you're getting mentally confused about some random stories from the Middle ages that are completely wrong.

    Replies: @mulga mumblebrain, @King Edward I

    The Jews were never expelled from anywhere, just converted. You made the whole thing up in your mind, it’s obviously wrong.

    My god you fake jews are so ignorant about your real history. Let me help you out here, shlomo.

    1. Ashkenazi jews are not really jews at all. Your female line comes from White gentile European women and not semitic women.
    https://www.livescience.com/40247-ashkenazi-jews-have-european-genes.html

    2. Your jewish priests are pathological liars. They lied about jewish “history”.
    a. The exodus tale is a LIE. jews were never slaves in Egypt. You need to apologize to Egyptians for spreading blood libels against them.
    b. The esther/Haman story is a lie. It is ahistorical. It never happened.
    c. The judith story is a lie. It is ahistorical. It never happened.

    3. fake jews (ashkenazis) have indeed been expelled over 1,000 times. Why? Well, your jewish priests lie about that too. Fake jews have been expelled BECAUSE jews always push a jews-first agenda, even when that agenda harms their host people. It’s about jewish bad behaviors.
    https://archive.org/details/the-complete-list-of-the-one-thousand-and-thirty-jewish-expulsions-in-human-history/page/n3/mode/2up

    I’m wondering shlomo. Do you think you are being “tricky” like jacob deceiving Esau by lying to me and others about jewish expulsions? Why do so many of your people relish in telling absolute lies about things. You know dishonesty ranks right up there in the list of why jews have been expelled from so many places. So why can’t you stop lying and act like a normal, honorable, honest people?

    ROFL….even Native Americans in Guatemala expelled your people for their rotten, selfish behavior.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-28992743#:~:text=Some%20230%20members%20of%20an%20Orthodox%20Jewish

    •ï¿½Agree: HdC
    •ï¿½Replies: @Sandy Beach
    @King Edward I

    Thanks for sharing your giant mentally ill word salad as you have a nervous breakdown on the internet.

    Typical boomer

    Replies: @King Edward I
  • @mulga mumblebrain
    @Fran Taubman

    Melanie, no matter how much Yahweh would love the blood, but you can't kill them all. Sorry to disappoint. Nasrallah will be replaced, and the others, too. Eventually if you Judeonazis refuse to ever compromise with people you regard as animals, Israel will fall. Perhaps some new regime in Pakistan will tire of seeing Moslems slaughtered so callously, and nuke the Judenreich. Or one or more nukes will be stolen, and there you go. Your hatred will be the end of you, and most of the world will NOT shed a tear.

    Replies: @Sandy Beach

    “just you wait till next time it’s going to be different!” It’s always next time and always excuses and always the armchair general.

    Anybody this arrogant has clearly never had a job or needed to produce anything, go play with your toy soldiers and imagine games while real people take the world.

    There will be that nuclear bomb from Pakistan because that’s exactly what it reads in Revelations, but what you are confusing as a small country is actually the entire Western alliance. This is called “Israel” in the bible.

    Out with some more regurgitation and atheist scoffing, but the foxhole catches up to everyone eventually.

    •ï¿½Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
    @Sandy Beach

    Yes-the Judenreich IS the spearhead of the Western 'Clash of Civilizations' race and cultural war on the non-West, led by China. Western elites, and brainwashed and vicious cretins like YOU, are so deranged, in-bred and arrogant that they think that they can attack China, and win. And like most 'Christian Zionazi' slaves, you confuse the Torah with the Christian New Testament. The two are complete antitheses, and you are Judaic, never 'Christian'. The arrogance and blood-lust says it all.
  • @mulga mumblebrain
    @Sandy Beach

    The sheer chutzpah of this Judeonazi troll is gobsmacking. Expelled from Rome 139 BCE, again in 19 CE, and 41-53 CE, 415 expelled from Alexandria, 1012 from Mainz, 12-14th centuries numerous expulsions from France, 1231 from Leicester, 1290 from all of England, 1360 from Hungary, 1420-1 from Austria, 1492 from Spain and Sicily, 1496 from Portugal, and on and on.
    I do not support such actions, of course, although they are very frequent which ought to raise concerns. Many were given the 'choice' of conversion, and some did so while keeping their ongoing Judaism secret-the 'cryptoJews'. As many observers have noted, some of the blame for these expulsions must lie with the Jews, and judging by their behaviour since 1947, that 'some' is probably very great.

    Replies: @Sandy Beach

    Meanwhile the globe continued spinning and billions of people lived and died over thousands of years everywhere. It’s a fantasy of your mind because it’s not even accurately described and it doesn’t mean there’s a giant group getting “expelled” from these places.

    Something happened in France at the aristocratic level of government with a small number of people but suddenly Persia magically popped into the picture 2000 miles away. Effortless bubble thinking

    Spain is a good example, considering about 100,000 people left during the Jewish expulsion out of several million Spanish Jews that were recorded in the previous centuries. Where did everybody go then who wasn’t expelled? You have literally zero grasp of history It’s more like playing with toy soldiers or board games.

    This is why all of your takes are always wrong, but it’s hilarious so keep it up! Same as the Wogs, always making thousands of assumptions then all of a sudden they’re surprised when the missiles hit them. It’s because you live and believe in ideology instead of real-time facts, geometry and basic math.

    •ï¿½Replies: @King Edward I
    @Sandy Beach

    (((sandy))) says

    The Jews were never expelled from anywhere, just converted
    �
    Then (((sandy))) says...

    Spain is a good example, considering about 100,000 people left during the Jewish expulsion
    �
    First they were allegedly never expelled...then a few posts later, he inadvertently admits he was lying.

    Look shlomo, you are a pathological liar. Your lying rabbis and your lying parents likely fucked up your brain and made you the raving deceiver and hypocrite you are today. It's not "funny". It's not "culture". It's sick and people tire of lying jews.

    Please shlomo, get help. Stop believing in the ethnic cult your gullible ancestors fell for. Do better shlomo. Drop the yahweh sky ghost cult....start being consistent, fair, and begin being honest.

    Abandon your ancestors and your tribe of liars and become a real human being. If enough of you do it, you can truly make the world a better place.

    I'm trying to help here.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l60MnDJklnM
  • @Z-man
    @Ron Unz

    Well, she was OK looking as a young woman, but as it was stated, that's a professional studio portrait of the young Bader.
    As I comment, in my shallow moments, about some women's looks, 'The miracle of modern makeup.... and modern photography'. 😆

    Replies: @mulga mumblebrain, @24th Alabama, @Mike Tre, @Alexandros

    Not really. That is a one in a million picture. If you check the other pictures on that site she looks plenty horrid already in her early 20s.

    Felicity Jones on the other hand is one of the prettiest girls the world has to offer. To have her play this gremlin Jew is an insult.

  • @Odyssey
    @notanonymousHere

    I already said that you should present your ID with every comment because there are new readers who don't know you and your species, which you represent perfectly, while you try to hide in the general population and present yourself as normal.
    So, I will present your ID:

    https://www.unz.com/article/tucker-carlsons-non-denial-denialism-of-the-holocaust/#comment-6757916

    Replies: @notanonymousHere

    I already said that you should present your ID with every comment because there are new readers who don’t know you and your species, which you represent perfectly, while you try to hide in the general population and present yourself as normal.
    So, I will present your ID:

    https://www.unz.com/article/tucker-carlsons-non-denial-denialism-of-the-holocaust/#comment-6757916

    I don’t see how one of YOUR posts is my “ID” but whatevs. You really are in need of a good solid thorough daily anal snuffling. Being a lying Serb homosexual I imagine you’d enjoy that.

    How do people navigate through your homosexuality and body odor in your daily life? You are as huge a pile of Serbian shit as Tesla was a genius. Not fit to rinse out his jizzrag, one of which I own, having bought it at auction. And yes, “jizzrag” is a Serbian word. In fact it’s most Serbian words.

    You’re a strange puckery sort of fellow.

  • @Fran Taubman
    @ariadna

    No word on Nasrallah alive or dead. His daughter was killed. The Israeli's bombed 6 buildings all Hezbollah head quarters. Sorry to ruin your day, but the Jews are definitely taking out those Jihadist. There really is no where for them to hide. Hezbollah is going down.

    Replies: @ariadna, @mulga mumblebrain

    Melanie, no matter how much Yahweh would love the blood, but you can’t kill them all. Sorry to disappoint. Nasrallah will be replaced, and the others, too. Eventually if you Judeonazis refuse to ever compromise with people you regard as animals, Israel will fall. Perhaps some new regime in Pakistan will tire of seeing Moslems slaughtered so callously, and nuke the Judenreich. Or one or more nukes will be stolen, and there you go. Your hatred will be the end of you, and most of the world will NOT shed a tear.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Sandy Beach
    @mulga mumblebrain

    "just you wait till next time it's going to be different!" It's always next time and always excuses and always the armchair general.

    Anybody this arrogant has clearly never had a job or needed to produce anything, go play with your toy soldiers and imagine games while real people take the world.

    There will be that nuclear bomb from Pakistan because that's exactly what it reads in Revelations, but what you are confusing as a small country is actually the entire Western alliance. This is called "Israel" in the bible.

    Out with some more regurgitation and atheist scoffing, but the foxhole catches up to everyone eventually.

    Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  • @Sandy Beach
    @King Edward I

    The Jews were never expelled from anywhere, just converted. You made the whole thing up in your mind, it's obviously wrong. The point is that Jewish elements are at the foundation of France, Spain, Northern and Southern Italy, and of course Poland and Hungary besides Austria.

    There are literal lines of Jewish kings in Austria and Hungary, the word could mean practically anything. There was a time when Celtic and Gothic tribes were called "Jews". Again you're getting mentally confused about some random stories from the Middle ages that are completely wrong.

    Replies: @mulga mumblebrain, @King Edward I

    The sheer chutzpah of this Judeonazi troll is gobsmacking. Expelled from Rome 139 BCE, again in 19 CE, and 41-53 CE, 415 expelled from Alexandria, 1012 from Mainz, 12-14th centuries numerous expulsions from France, 1231 from Leicester, 1290 from all of England, 1360 from Hungary, 1420-1 from Austria, 1492 from Spain and Sicily, 1496 from Portugal, and on and on.
    I do not support such actions, of course, although they are very frequent which ought to raise concerns. Many were given the ‘choice’ of conversion, and some did so while keeping their ongoing Judaism secret-the ‘cryptoJews’. As many observers have noted, some of the blame for these expulsions must lie with the Jews, and judging by their behaviour since 1947, that ‘some’ is probably very great.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Sandy Beach
    @mulga mumblebrain

    Meanwhile the globe continued spinning and billions of people lived and died over thousands of years everywhere. It's a fantasy of your mind because it's not even accurately described and it doesn't mean there's a giant group getting "expelled" from these places.

    Something happened in France at the aristocratic level of government with a small number of people but suddenly Persia magically popped into the picture 2000 miles away. Effortless bubble thinking

    Spain is a good example, considering about 100,000 people left during the Jewish expulsion out of several million Spanish Jews that were recorded in the previous centuries. Where did everybody go then who wasn't expelled? You have literally zero grasp of history It's more like playing with toy soldiers or board games.

    This is why all of your takes are always wrong, but it's hilarious so keep it up! Same as the Wogs, always making thousands of assumptions then all of a sudden they're surprised when the missiles hit them. It's because you live and believe in ideology instead of real-time facts, geometry and basic math.

    Replies: @King Edward I
  • @Sandy Beach
    @Odyssey

    You should angrily demand very specific history lessons on the internet, hands on hips. Magic disembodied voices will answer all of your stupid questions, although Goths and Jews were definitely around at the same time LOL Try learning some calendar perhaps, or simple arithmetic.

    ALL OF THE THEORIES are probably accurate together. People went from west to east and from south to north and ended up in the same place. Yiddish is clearly German, it's mutually intelligible with Hebrew words and other phrases mixed into it. The cultural superiority is that people who were acclimatized in Western Europe are clearly going to be superior in technology and experience to those in Eastern Europe. The example is that a German dialect spread into Russia, so it's just normal inference. People adopt Latin because it was a "superior culture" to the locals. Just like English has expanded today, do I need to prove the cultural superiority for that as well?

    Be sure to angrily demand some more history lessons tho. Here imagine that Google was optional:

    https://www.theapricity.com/snpa/chapter-XI7.htm

    Imagine people much smarter than you already did all the work and all that has to happen is shut your goddamn mouth and read. Imagine you had a job

    Replies: @Odyssey

    I have no reason to be angry, but you obviously do, and that’s why you’re showing frustration. The lack of logic cannot be compensated for by any additional reading. It is simply a ridiculous attitude (but understandable given the milieu it comes from) that all theories are correct even if they show contradictions. If the facts do not agree with them, so much the worse for the facts.

    You obviously have no idea about linguistics. Otherwise, you would have known that at the time of the supposed arrival of the Jews (you obviously don’t even know when that term dates from) from Germany, the German language almost didn’t even exist, so to speak.

    And what? – Jews from Germany come to Eastern Europe with Yiddish, which is a German language (dialect), while another stream of Jews comes from the south-east (Asia Minor, Persia, Caucasus) and in Russia they speak the same language (i.e. Persian-Caucasian-Asia Minor Jews speak German). LOL.

    You have no idea about Latin, which no one speaks and from which not a single language arose, but only the Vatican took that provincial Apennine dialect as their official one. How is it that Yiddish (supposedly German) and Hebrew are the same (or mutually intelligible) languages?

    You obviously leave the speculation that the Goths and the Jews are somehow related (lol) and you avoid giving an example of the cultural superiority of the Jews over the neighbouring Palestinian converts, who happen to be the same race(!?).

    Who could I ask for history lessons from? Maybe you know, but you avoided saying, if there was a Jewish population boom and if it only refers to the ‘western‘ Jews, who spoke German, while the ones from the south-east were not such big fuc*ers (even though their language was similar to German)?

    Since you are already an expert in German and Yiddish, you may know whether it is true that the derogatory name for Jews, kikes (‘nobody wants, nobody likes …kikes, kikes, kikes’), comes from the doubling of the frequent ending of their surnames, kiki (ki x 2) or, all theories are also true here, including kikel (circle) and Ikey-Kikey (mentioned in the comment #136)??

  • @Odyssey
    @Sandy Beach

    It is possible to arbitrarily insert some detail in the course of history that may even be true, but if there is no logic from end to end, without any holes, then the whole story is worthless.

    Here's a detail:

    There was a time when Celtic and Gothic tribes were called “Jewsâ€.
    �
    WHO called it Celts and Goths - Jews? What is that statement trying to do? To somehow connect the Goths and the Jews as was already attempted by the panzers who, in addition, claimed to be Aryans? This cannot be true because the term Jews has been around recently and did not exist in the time of the Goths.

    You are trying to present two contradictory facts as valid. First, that the converts to Judaism are various peoples (Persia, the Caucasus, Western Asia, etc.), which means that they have no genetic connection with the Palestinian Jews.

    The second place mentions converts who are actually very similar (I guess genetically). Thus, it remains undefined whether Ashkenazis and Sephardim are the same (genetic) group. The commentary is a mixture of current theories - Rhineland, Khazar and Punic.

    The Rhineland, for example, talks about the same origin (so the term Ashkenazi is just semantics) and that Jews from Germany went to Eastern Europe, where their number increased enormously due to the demographic boom (from 50K to 8 million in 500 years).

    A lot of “Jewish†is the conversion of similar people towards what must have been the superior culture, the same way other nations became Latin or German speaking instead of something else.

    According to what, the converts to Judaism did it because of the supposed transition to a superior culture? Give us one example of cultural superiority.

    The language part is completely meaningless (Latin, Yiddish). Yiddish is not a German dialect and how is it possible that Jews, for example in Russia, speak a German dialect.

    So, decide according to the current mainstream hypotheses - Khazar, Rhineland (with the Punic variant) and point out the elements with which you disagree. Alternatively, you can subscribe to the Odyssey’s Hypothesis (c) where you also will get a bonus in terms of the meaning of the word Germany (and depending on my current mood, the meaning of Europe, too).

    Replies: @Sandy Beach

    You should angrily demand very specific history lessons on the internet, hands on hips. Magic disembodied voices will answer all of your stupid questions, although Goths and Jews were definitely around at the same time LOL Try learning some calendar perhaps, or simple arithmetic.

    ALL OF THE THEORIES are probably accurate together. People went from west to east and from south to north and ended up in the same place. Yiddish is clearly German, it’s mutually intelligible with Hebrew words and other phrases mixed into it. The cultural superiority is that people who were acclimatized in Western Europe are clearly going to be superior in technology and experience to those in Eastern Europe. The example is that a German dialect spread into Russia, so it’s just normal inference. People adopt Latin because it was a “superior culture” to the locals. Just like English has expanded today, do I need to prove the cultural superiority for that as well?

    Be sure to angrily demand some more history lessons tho. Here imagine that Google was optional:

    https://www.theapricity.com/snpa/chapter-XI7.htm

    Imagine people much smarter than you already did all the work and all that has to happen is shut your goddamn mouth and read. Imagine you had a job

    •ï¿½Replies: @Odyssey
    @Sandy Beach

    I have no reason to be angry, but you obviously do, and that's why you're showing frustration. The lack of logic cannot be compensated for by any additional reading. It is simply a ridiculous attitude (but understandable given the milieu it comes from) that all theories are correct even if they show contradictions. If the facts do not agree with them, so much the worse for the facts.

    You obviously have no idea about linguistics. Otherwise, you would have known that at the time of the supposed arrival of the Jews (you obviously don't even know when that term dates from) from Germany, the German language almost didn't even exist, so to speak.

    And what? - Jews from Germany come to Eastern Europe with Yiddish, which is a German language (dialect), while another stream of Jews comes from the south-east (Asia Minor, Persia, Caucasus) and in Russia they speak the same language (i.e. Persian-Caucasian-Asia Minor Jews speak German). LOL.

    You have no idea about Latin, which no one speaks and from which not a single language arose, but only the Vatican took that provincial Apennine dialect as their official one. How is it that Yiddish (supposedly German) and Hebrew are the same (or mutually intelligible) languages?

    You obviously leave the speculation that the Goths and the Jews are somehow related (lol) and you avoid giving an example of the cultural superiority of the Jews over the neighbouring Palestinian converts, who happen to be the same race(!?).

    Who could I ask for history lessons from? Maybe you know, but you avoided saying, if there was a Jewish population boom and if it only refers to the 'western' Jews, who spoke German, while the ones from the south-east were not such big fuc*ers (even though their language was similar to German)?

    Since you are already an expert in German and Yiddish, you may know whether it is true that the derogatory name for Jews, kikes ('nobody wants, nobody likes …kikes, kikes, kikes'), comes from the doubling of the frequent ending of their surnames, kiki (ki x 2) or, all theories are also true here, including kikel (circle) and Ikey-Kikey (mentioned in the comment #136)??
  • @Sandy Beach
    @Odyssey

    Everybody else means the rest of Jewish dispersion and history. Sephardi and Ashkenazi often interchange and it depends on the mixture of ancestral population, obviously. You ask way too many bewildered questions instead of just observing the human condition like any anthropologist could easily do.

    Carlton S Coon published a very well-known book back in the 1930s or so, full of photos and so forth. Discusses the racial origins of the Jewish people. Obviously the Ashkenazi people "exist" meaning there was a large number of Yiddish speakers in Eastern Europe until recently. It's a hugely varied population with many origins, language and culture have a way of spreading.

    The best analogy is Hispanic, which includes anything from Latin Europe Mediterranean to Celtic over to South America and Central America, all kinds of different people. What unifies them is ancestral connection to Spain the language and Roman Catholicism.

    The Sephardic people by definition spoke Ladino and are included within the Hispanic world. It's clear from anthropology and history that Eastern European Jews derive from Asia Minor, the old Persian empire, the caucuses, Western Asia. The Sephardic trend came from Mesopotamia and the original Phoenician colonies, speaking generally. A lot of "Jewish" is the conversion of similar people towards what must have been the superior culture, the same way other nations became Latin or German speaking instead of something else.

    Islam and arabism have the very similar effect, as this civilizational culture and language with its religion spread across the middle lands of the old world. Some people got their culture from the Arabs and have henceforth been Muslims even though they are Indonesians etc

    https://www.theapricity.com/snpa/racesofeurope.htm

    Replies: @Odyssey

    It is possible to arbitrarily insert some detail in the course of history that may even be true, but if there is no logic from end to end, without any holes, then the whole story is worthless.

    Here’s a detail:

    There was a time when Celtic and Gothic tribes were called “Jewsâ€.

    WHO called it Celts and Goths – Jews? What is that statement trying to do? To somehow connect the Goths and the Jews as was already attempted by the panzers who, in addition, claimed to be Aryans? This cannot be true because the term Jews has been around recently and did not exist in the time of the Goths.

    You are trying to present two contradictory facts as valid. First, that the converts to Judaism are various peoples (Persia, the Caucasus, Western Asia, etc.), which means that they have no genetic connection with the Palestinian Jews.

    The second place mentions converts who are actually very similar (I guess genetically). Thus, it remains undefined whether Ashkenazis and Sephardim are the same (genetic) group. The commentary is a mixture of current theories – Rhineland, Khazar and Punic.

    The Rhineland, for example, talks about the same origin (so the term Ashkenazi is just semantics) and that Jews from Germany went to Eastern Europe, where their number increased enormously due to the demographic boom (from 50K to 8 million in 500 years).

    A lot of “Jewish†is the conversion of similar people towards what must have been the superior culture, the same way other nations became Latin or German speaking instead of something else.

    According to what, the converts to Judaism did it because of the supposed transition to a superior culture? Give us one example of cultural superiority.

    The language part is completely meaningless (Latin, Yiddish). Yiddish is not a German dialect and how is it possible that Jews, for example in Russia, speak a German dialect.

    So, decide according to the current mainstream hypotheses – Khazar, Rhineland (with the Punic variant) and point out the elements with which you disagree. Alternatively, you can subscribe to the Odyssey’s Hypothesis (c) where you also will get a bonus in terms of the meaning of the word Germany (and depending on my current mood, the meaning of Europe, too).

    •ï¿½Replies: @Sandy Beach
    @Odyssey

    You should angrily demand very specific history lessons on the internet, hands on hips. Magic disembodied voices will answer all of your stupid questions, although Goths and Jews were definitely around at the same time LOL Try learning some calendar perhaps, or simple arithmetic.

    ALL OF THE THEORIES are probably accurate together. People went from west to east and from south to north and ended up in the same place. Yiddish is clearly German, it's mutually intelligible with Hebrew words and other phrases mixed into it. The cultural superiority is that people who were acclimatized in Western Europe are clearly going to be superior in technology and experience to those in Eastern Europe. The example is that a German dialect spread into Russia, so it's just normal inference. People adopt Latin because it was a "superior culture" to the locals. Just like English has expanded today, do I need to prove the cultural superiority for that as well?

    Be sure to angrily demand some more history lessons tho. Here imagine that Google was optional:

    https://www.theapricity.com/snpa/chapter-XI7.htm

    Imagine people much smarter than you already did all the work and all that has to happen is shut your goddamn mouth and read. Imagine you had a job

    Replies: @Odyssey
  • @Odyssey
    @Sandy Beach


    It's literally the same origin as everybody else, Asia Minor the Cacusus and Persia.
    �
    Who are the everybody else?
    Does this mean that Ashenazim don't really exist as a separate group, but it's just an arbitrary name without any real substance?
    What about Sephardim? Do they exist as a group with specific features? What is actually distinction between them?

    Replies: @Sandy Beach, @Sandy Beach

    More specifically:

    https://www.theapricity.com/snpa/chapter-XI7.htm

    Traces the anthropological origins of modern jewry

  • 6788664

    Your comment is laughably incoherent, so it is difficult to know what point you think you are making….that there were Jews in Mesopotamia and Persia is entirely irrelevant to the issue of the origin of the Ashkenazi(European) Jews. The Ashkenazi Jews did not exist prior to the Roman Empire period, when Jews of Historical Syria and Egypt could freely travel and settle in Rome, and married Roman(Italian) women. This is the origin of the Ashkenazi(European) Jews. This fact is beyond dispute, confirmed by modern genetic analysis. The Jews of Eastern Europe are Ashkenazi. There is zero evidence that Sephardi(Middle Eastern) Jews independently settled Eastern Europe or Ukraine. The Sephardi never spoke Yiddish or anything remotely like it. That Yiddish(vulgarly corrupted German) was spoken by Eastern European Ashkenazi strongly suggests a migratory line from the Roman Empire Provinces to Germany and into Eastern Europe. There was no “Jewish empire” of Khazaria. The Khazarians were a Steppe People following an Animist religion. Allegedly, for some unknown reason, the Royal Family converted to the Jewish cult. The rest of the population stayed Animist. The Khazars were genocided by the Mongols and their culture utterly destroyed so it is difficult to know what really happened there, if anything. The entire story is, at best, poorly sourced. Fertile ground for crackpot pseudo-historians.

  • @Fran Taubman
    @ariadna

    No word on Nasrallah alive or dead. His daughter was killed. The Israeli's bombed 6 buildings all Hezbollah head quarters. Sorry to ruin your day, but the Jews are definitely taking out those Jihadist. There really is no where for them to hide. Hezbollah is going down.

    Replies: @ariadna, @mulga mumblebrain

    Trollette

  • @King Edward I

    Jewish populations were self supporting and essential, at the foundation of every European kingdom from Hungary to France to Spain to Poland.
    �
    '

    Self serving jewish lies. "Essential" my ass. England was fine after I expelled the parasites from my land. It was only the rat pos cromwell that invited the dirty bloodsuckers back.

    Without non jews to leech off of, jews would not amount to anything. Just imagine israel today without the backing of hundreds of billions in weapons, technology, and money from the US and Europe.

    If jews were "self supporting", they wouldn't need western weapons, or money. Capisce shlomo?

    Replies: @Sandy Beach

    The Jews were never expelled from anywhere, just converted. You made the whole thing up in your mind, it’s obviously wrong. The point is that Jewish elements are at the foundation of France, Spain, Northern and Southern Italy, and of course Poland and Hungary besides Austria.

    There are literal lines of Jewish kings in Austria and Hungary, the word could mean practically anything. There was a time when Celtic and Gothic tribes were called “Jews”. Again you’re getting mentally confused about some random stories from the Middle ages that are completely wrong.

    •ï¿½Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
    @Sandy Beach

    The sheer chutzpah of this Judeonazi troll is gobsmacking. Expelled from Rome 139 BCE, again in 19 CE, and 41-53 CE, 415 expelled from Alexandria, 1012 from Mainz, 12-14th centuries numerous expulsions from France, 1231 from Leicester, 1290 from all of England, 1360 from Hungary, 1420-1 from Austria, 1492 from Spain and Sicily, 1496 from Portugal, and on and on.
    I do not support such actions, of course, although they are very frequent which ought to raise concerns. Many were given the 'choice' of conversion, and some did so while keeping their ongoing Judaism secret-the 'cryptoJews'. As many observers have noted, some of the blame for these expulsions must lie with the Jews, and judging by their behaviour since 1947, that 'some' is probably very great.

    Replies: @Sandy Beach
    , @King Edward I
    @Sandy Beach


    The Jews were never expelled from anywhere, just converted. You made the whole thing up in your mind, it’s obviously wrong.
    �
    My god you fake jews are so ignorant about your real history. Let me help you out here, shlomo.

    1. Ashkenazi jews are not really jews at all. Your female line comes from White gentile European women and not semitic women.
    https://www.livescience.com/40247-ashkenazi-jews-have-european-genes.html

    2. Your jewish priests are pathological liars. They lied about jewish "history".
    a. The exodus tale is a LIE. jews were never slaves in Egypt. You need to apologize to Egyptians for spreading blood libels against them.
    b. The esther/Haman story is a lie. It is ahistorical. It never happened.
    c. The judith story is a lie. It is ahistorical. It never happened.

    3. fake jews (ashkenazis) have indeed been expelled over 1,000 times. Why? Well, your jewish priests lie about that too. Fake jews have been expelled BECAUSE jews always push a jews-first agenda, even when that agenda harms their host people. It's about jewish bad behaviors.
    https://archive.org/details/the-complete-list-of-the-one-thousand-and-thirty-jewish-expulsions-in-human-history/page/n3/mode/2up

    I'm wondering shlomo. Do you think you are being "tricky" like jacob deceiving Esau by lying to me and others about jewish expulsions? Why do so many of your people relish in telling absolute lies about things. You know dishonesty ranks right up there in the list of why jews have been expelled from so many places. So why can't you stop lying and act like a normal, honorable, honest people?

    ROFL....even Native Americans in Guatemala expelled your people for their rotten, selfish behavior.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-28992743#:~:text=Some%20230%20members%20of%20an%20Orthodox%20Jewish

    Replies: @Sandy Beach
  • @Odyssey
    @Sandy Beach


    It's literally the same origin as everybody else, Asia Minor the Cacusus and Persia.
    �
    Who are the everybody else?
    Does this mean that Ashenazim don't really exist as a separate group, but it's just an arbitrary name without any real substance?
    What about Sephardim? Do they exist as a group with specific features? What is actually distinction between them?

    Replies: @Sandy Beach, @Sandy Beach

    Everybody else means the rest of Jewish dispersion and history. Sephardi and Ashkenazi often interchange and it depends on the mixture of ancestral population, obviously. You ask way too many bewildered questions instead of just observing the human condition like any anthropologist could easily do.

    Carlton S Coon published a very well-known book back in the 1930s or so, full of photos and so forth. Discusses the racial origins of the Jewish people. Obviously the Ashkenazi people “exist” meaning there was a large number of Yiddish speakers in Eastern Europe until recently. It’s a hugely varied population with many origins, language and culture have a way of spreading.

    The best analogy is Hispanic, which includes anything from Latin Europe Mediterranean to Celtic over to South America and Central America, all kinds of different people. What unifies them is ancestral connection to Spain the language and Roman Catholicism.

    The Sephardic people by definition spoke Ladino and are included within the Hispanic world. It’s clear from anthropology and history that Eastern European Jews derive from Asia Minor, the old Persian empire, the caucuses, Western Asia. The Sephardic trend came from Mesopotamia and the original Phoenician colonies, speaking generally. A lot of “Jewish” is the conversion of similar people towards what must have been the superior culture, the same way other nations became Latin or German speaking instead of something else.

    Islam and arabism have the very similar effect, as this civilizational culture and language with its religion spread across the middle lands of the old world. Some people got their culture from the Arabs and have henceforth been Muslims even though they are Indonesians etc

    https://www.theapricity.com/snpa/racesofeurope.htm

    •ï¿½Replies: @Odyssey
    @Sandy Beach

    It is possible to arbitrarily insert some detail in the course of history that may even be true, but if there is no logic from end to end, without any holes, then the whole story is worthless.

    Here's a detail:

    There was a time when Celtic and Gothic tribes were called “Jewsâ€.
    �
    WHO called it Celts and Goths - Jews? What is that statement trying to do? To somehow connect the Goths and the Jews as was already attempted by the panzers who, in addition, claimed to be Aryans? This cannot be true because the term Jews has been around recently and did not exist in the time of the Goths.

    You are trying to present two contradictory facts as valid. First, that the converts to Judaism are various peoples (Persia, the Caucasus, Western Asia, etc.), which means that they have no genetic connection with the Palestinian Jews.

    The second place mentions converts who are actually very similar (I guess genetically). Thus, it remains undefined whether Ashkenazis and Sephardim are the same (genetic) group. The commentary is a mixture of current theories - Rhineland, Khazar and Punic.

    The Rhineland, for example, talks about the same origin (so the term Ashkenazi is just semantics) and that Jews from Germany went to Eastern Europe, where their number increased enormously due to the demographic boom (from 50K to 8 million in 500 years).

    A lot of “Jewish†is the conversion of similar people towards what must have been the superior culture, the same way other nations became Latin or German speaking instead of something else.

    According to what, the converts to Judaism did it because of the supposed transition to a superior culture? Give us one example of cultural superiority.

    The language part is completely meaningless (Latin, Yiddish). Yiddish is not a German dialect and how is it possible that Jews, for example in Russia, speak a German dialect.

    So, decide according to the current mainstream hypotheses - Khazar, Rhineland (with the Punic variant) and point out the elements with which you disagree. Alternatively, you can subscribe to the Odyssey’s Hypothesis (c) where you also will get a bonus in terms of the meaning of the word Germany (and depending on my current mood, the meaning of Europe, too).

    Replies: @Sandy Beach
  • @notanonymousHere
    @Odyssey

    The Scots moved to Britain after buggering and murdering all the Serbian homosexuals. Today's Serbs are a mixture of Negroes and Gypsies (screw that "Roma" noise) who moved into the area afterwards.

    Replies: @Odyssey

    I already said that you should present your ID with every comment because there are new readers who don’t know you and your species, which you represent perfectly, while you try to hide in the general population and present yourself as normal.
    So, I will present your ID:

    https://www.unz.com/article/tucker-carlsons-non-denial-denialism-of-the-holocaust/#comment-6757916

    •ï¿½Replies: @notanonymousHere
    @Odyssey


    I already said that you should present your ID with every comment because there are new readers who don’t know you and your species, which you represent perfectly, while you try to hide in the general population and present yourself as normal.
    So, I will present your ID:

    https://www.unz.com/article/tucker-carlsons-non-denial-denialism-of-the-holocaust/#comment-6757916
    �
    I don't see how one of YOUR posts is my "ID" but whatevs. You really are in need of a good solid thorough daily anal snuffling. Being a lying Serb homosexual I imagine you'd enjoy that.

    How do people navigate through your homosexuality and body odor in your daily life? You are as huge a pile of Serbian shit as Tesla was a genius. Not fit to rinse out his jizzrag, one of which I own, having bought it at auction. And yes, "jizzrag" is a Serbian word. In fact it's most Serbian words.

    You're a strange puckery sort of fellow.
  • 6788664

    Jewish populations were self supporting and essential, at the foundation of every European kingdom from Hungary to France to Spain to Poland.

    Self serving jewish lies. “Essential” my ass. England was fine after I expelled the parasites from my land. It was only the rat pos cromwell that invited the dirty bloodsuckers back.

    Without non jews to leech off of, jews would not amount to anything. Just imagine israel today without the backing of hundreds of billions in weapons, technology, and money from the US and Europe.

    If jews were “self supporting”, they wouldn’t need western weapons, or money. Capisce shlomo?

    •ï¿½Agree: HdC
    •ï¿½Replies: @Sandy Beach
    @King Edward I

    The Jews were never expelled from anywhere, just converted. You made the whole thing up in your mind, it's obviously wrong. The point is that Jewish elements are at the foundation of France, Spain, Northern and Southern Italy, and of course Poland and Hungary besides Austria.

    There are literal lines of Jewish kings in Austria and Hungary, the word could mean practically anything. There was a time when Celtic and Gothic tribes were called "Jews". Again you're getting mentally confused about some random stories from the Middle ages that are completely wrong.

    Replies: @mulga mumblebrain, @King Edward I
  • 6788683

    So jew, why doesn’t your homeland of israel invite millions of subsaharan africans to move to israel if it would be so “beneficial”?

  • 6788683

    Complete and utter bullshit.

    If Japan wants more people, it doesn’t need to replace their own people with foreigners that despise them.

    Europe is doing that and so is the Anglosphere, and it isn’t “working”..

    The only way to mask its failure is through heavy handed censorship, political, social, and economic suppression. All pro White advocacy groups for the most part in the west are severely repressed.

    Repression of dissidents is a sign that something is rotten. Its a sign that an agenda is being pushed that the masses hate.

    BTW, what makes you think populations have to grow and grow and grow for eternity? Aren’t natural resources limited? So why does Japan’s population have to grow? Is this written in stone somewhere, that human populations must expand beyond the carrying capacity of their environment?

  • @Odyssey
    @King Edward I

    Longshanks, both of them (and the Welsh) are Celts, but do you know the original meaning of the term Scots, if you already hammered them?

    Replies: @notanonymousHere

    The Scots moved to Britain after buggering and murdering all the Serbian homosexuals. Today’s Serbs are a mixture of Negroes and Gypsies (screw that “Roma” noise) who moved into the area afterwards.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Odyssey
    @notanonymousHere

    I already said that you should present your ID with every comment because there are new readers who don't know you and your species, which you represent perfectly, while you try to hide in the general population and present yourself as normal.
    So, I will present your ID:

    https://www.unz.com/article/tucker-carlsons-non-denial-denialism-of-the-holocaust/#comment-6757916

    Replies: @notanonymousHere
  • @King Edward I
    @Z-man

    Yeah, truly strange that jews want to exterminate White gentiles...especially considering it is half of their genetic makeup:

    https://www.livescience.com/40247-ashkenazi-jews-have-european-genes.html


    I chalk it up to most ashkenazis being ignorant about their true history. Just like when I tell most Scots that they are really named after an Irish tribe.....that were called the "Scotti" from Ireland, they shake their heads in ignorant disbelief.

    Most of humanity seem to be unread, lazy buffoons...whether they are jews or not.

    Replies: @Odyssey, @Anymike

    Most of humanity seem to be unread, lazy buffoons…

    You don’t say, eh?

  • @Odyssey
    @Bombercommand

    Most of what has been said is acceptable, but there is a lack of logic from end to end. Who are these 'Italian women'? How (and when) did the Jews find themselves in Central Europe? How is it possible that out of 50 K (15th century) there are 8 million Jews in Eastern Europe (20th century)? Can it be explained by an (isolated) demographic boom? How did it come to be that Ashkenazis make up more than 85% of the total number of Jews? How (when and where) did Yiddish originate?

    Replies: @Bombercommand

    In the early years of the Roman Empire, 2000 years ago, Syria, Egypt, and Anatolia became Provinces of The Empire, and the residents of the provinces had freedom of travel throughout the Pax Romana. As the saying goes: “All roads lead to Rome”. Jewish males of wealthy families relocated to Rome for business and political contacts. They married Roman women as this gave them Roman family connections. Like Jews moving to New York City or London and becoming Americans or British, they went where the business and political action was. Rich people need families to pass on inherited wealth. Simple common sense. I don’t know exactly “when” Jews filtered into Central Europe, but you certainly see zero Jews in the areas of Europe opposed to the Roman Empire, so I suppose the Jews filtered in on the heels of the infamous Northern Crusades during the Medieval Period. Regarding numbers of Jews in Europe, The United States imported less that 400,000 useless low IQ Negroes before 1803 and 200 years later there are 40,000,000 infesting the USA, so 50K Jews growing to 8 million infesting Eastern Europe in 500 years does not seem surprising…..Yiddish is merely corrupted German.

  • Cliche corner (they are cliches because they are true…)

    Handsome is as handsome does

    Ugly as sin

    Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

    Best of all: A hit, a hit, a very palpable hit!

    It’s very funny to see that they object to being called ugly. When they edited the New Testament version of JC’s Whipping of the Pharisees in the Temple, they must have left that bit out. After whipping them and calling them liars and blood thirsty Devil worshippers, JC and the boys’ parting words were: And not only that but you are all very ugly!

    Ostfront veteran and Plattdeutscher Hannecke Kardel reports on the existence of tall, blond haired and blue eyed Jews in Marocco during his post war decades there. His superb book, Adolf Hitler: Begruender Israels has the funniest opening paragraph you will ever read in an historical work.

    Nathan is not ugly as such: a couple of weeks Freude durch Arbeit in the open air, some snazzy threads and a bit of spiritual work would make him quite a handsome man…

    The article needs one addition to improve it: A picture of Toby next to Nathan with the tagline: Who’s a prettier boy then?

    It is heartening to see beauty being discussed, as there seems to be so much ugliness around in man made structures and art as well as in some people’s behaviour.

  • @King Edward I
    @Z-man

    Yeah, truly strange that jews want to exterminate White gentiles...especially considering it is half of their genetic makeup:

    https://www.livescience.com/40247-ashkenazi-jews-have-european-genes.html


    I chalk it up to most ashkenazis being ignorant about their true history. Just like when I tell most Scots that they are really named after an Irish tribe.....that were called the "Scotti" from Ireland, they shake their heads in ignorant disbelief.

    Most of humanity seem to be unread, lazy buffoons...whether they are jews or not.

    Replies: @Odyssey, @Anymike

    Longshanks, both of them (and the Welsh) are Celts, but do you know the original meaning of the term Scots, if you already hammered them?

    •ï¿½Replies: @notanonymousHere
    @Odyssey

    The Scots moved to Britain after buggering and murdering all the Serbian homosexuals. Today's Serbs are a mixture of Negroes and Gypsies (screw that "Roma" noise) who moved into the area afterwards.

    Replies: @Odyssey
  • For example, both of them are groups that, in my opinion, don’t belong in White societies partly because of the resentment they feel about superior White beauty.

    No, they don’t belong:

    1. Because they hate us and our people.
    2. Because they aren’t us, and are competitors and will push agendas that benefit their people even if it harms our people.

    There is a reason ethnostates are more stable. Diversity=division, and division eventually leads to conflict. It’s not complicated.

    Japan has a little over 125 million people….almost 100% of them are racially east Asian, and the overwhelming majority (over 98%) are ethnic Japanese. Would japan be better off if 25% of Japan’s population was mexican, and 15% was nigerian, 12% were Irish, and the rest were Japanese? With this “diversity”, would japan be more socially cohesive, safer, and better off? Clearly the answer to that question is NO!

    Dieversity is a recipe for unrest and distrust.

    My wife works for the county of LA. She says in her department, the chinese hate the filipinos, who hate the armenians, who hate the mexicans….and they all are tribal and look to benefit their own ethny and not the others.

    Not a recipe for “success” and long term stability

    •ï¿½Agree: mark green
  • @Z-man
    Jews have bought their way into the white/European genetic makeup since the times of The Romans/Byzantines, in one way or another. Thank God for the ghettos, Ghetti in Italian. 😊

    PS. I was walking down the street of my 'bucolic' suburban abode one Sunday morning and encountered a pick-up/drop-off point at the abandoned parking lot that used to house my supermarket. It was some Joo-ish school group with most of the men wearing small hats, lol, yamakas (yarmulke). I purposely walked thru the parking lot because, hey it's my town, but I smartly didn't shout "From the river to the sea Palestine will be free". 😄 I didn't want to be accosted by some testosterone peaking 18-year-olds or their fathers or even some rough yentas. 😆
    I noticed that many of these people were whiter than me! A lot of blonds and even red heads. One red haired girl appeared stunning. Maybe it's just because I like red heads, but she made me look twice. Many of these orthodox yids had to have a lot of Nordic blood in them, obviously, which proves my pernt above.

    Replies: @King Edward I

    Yeah, truly strange that jews want to exterminate White gentiles…especially considering it is half of their genetic makeup:

    https://www.livescience.com/40247-ashkenazi-jews-have-european-genes.html

    I chalk it up to most ashkenazis being ignorant about their true history. Just like when I tell most Scots that they are really named after an Irish tribe…..that were called the “Scotti” from Ireland, they shake their heads in ignorant disbelief.

    Most of humanity seem to be unread, lazy buffoons…whether they are jews or not.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Odyssey
    @King Edward I

    Longshanks, both of them (and the Welsh) are Celts, but do you know the original meaning of the term Scots, if you already hammered them?

    Replies: @notanonymousHere
    , @Anymike
    @King Edward I


    Most of humanity seem to be unread, lazy buffoons…
    �
    You don't say, eh?
  • @Bombercommand
    @Odyssey

    The Ashkenazi are the result of Jewish males moving to Rome and marrying Italian females. The Sephardi Jews(Middle Eastern Jews) have maintained this thesis for centuries and modern genetic analysis confirms it. The Sephardi also insist that the Ashkenazi are not "real Jews" because the line started with gentile mothers. If you think Ashkenazi Jews are ugly, take a gander at the Sephardi. They are easily recognizable by a characteristic totally weird squashed down protruding nose and a distinctly dark complexion. I have seen this both in a Jewish family from Lebanon that only came to North America in the 1960's and a Jewish family from Deal, New Jersey that doesn't acknowledge any Mid-East origin, exact same weird nose and bizarre dark complexion, totally unlike the Ashkenazi. BTW, the "Khazarian Hypothesis" is total bunk.

    Replies: @Odyssey

    Most of what has been said is acceptable, but there is a lack of logic from end to end. Who are these ‘Italian women’? How (and when) did the Jews find themselves in Central Europe? How is it possible that out of 50 K (15th century) there are 8 million Jews in Eastern Europe (20th century)? Can it be explained by an (isolated) demographic boom? How did it come to be that Ashkenazis make up more than 85% of the total number of Jews? How (when and where) did Yiddish originate?

    •ï¿½Replies: @Bombercommand
    @Odyssey

    In the early years of the Roman Empire, 2000 years ago, Syria, Egypt, and Anatolia became Provinces of The Empire, and the residents of the provinces had freedom of travel throughout the Pax Romana. As the saying goes: "All roads lead to Rome". Jewish males of wealthy families relocated to Rome for business and political contacts. They married Roman women as this gave them Roman family connections. Like Jews moving to New York City or London and becoming Americans or British, they went where the business and political action was. Rich people need families to pass on inherited wealth. Simple common sense. I don't know exactly "when" Jews filtered into Central Europe, but you certainly see zero Jews in the areas of Europe opposed to the Roman Empire, so I suppose the Jews filtered in on the heels of the infamous Northern Crusades during the Medieval Period. Regarding numbers of Jews in Europe, The United States imported less that 400,000 useless low IQ Negroes before 1803 and 200 years later there are 40,000,000 infesting the USA, so 50K Jews growing to 8 million infesting Eastern Europe in 500 years does not seem surprising.....Yiddish is merely corrupted German.
  • @Anymike
    @Che Guava

    A lot of people pose the question, which one will it be? Brave New World or 1984? My response is, why not both? We already have the two intermingled to a degree. We have the world of 1984 for the masses and a self-appointed Alpha overclass largely practicing eugenic breeding in the hopes of creating its own successors. Sometimes the eugenic calculations cross the boundaries of duplication and move into the territory of creating new types in the hope that these will be more capable of succeeding in the conditions which will prevail in the future. In that way, maybe breeding selection itself can be seen as kind of an arms race.

    In literature there any number of types of criticism. Just to name a few, Freudian, Marxist, formalist, structuralist, historicist and so on. Religious-based criticism is yet another type.

    When I see critical discussions of Brave New World based on interpersonal psychology it kind of rubs me the wrong way. The people who have done this kind of criticism maybe see something of themselves and the people around them in these characters in terms of their ethnic or racial type and kind of daily lives they are living.

    This kind of criticism I think fails to account for the fact that all of the people in this fictional society are artificial biological creations mired in an inescapable mediocrity and leading inauthentic and hollow lives. There is a moral horror to the whole thing which you cannot just let go over your head.

    Compare that to the world of 1984. Bad though the Big Brother dictatorship may be, life in the Oceania superstate does represent life as the human race has always known it. A tyrannical overclass which thinks with reptilian logic, a nervous ninny-neurotic middle class mired in a near-future time orientation and an often sodden and depressed proletariat and underclass.

    My approach to literature is structuralist and formalist, but my structuralism is the structuralism of social science, not literary structuralism. I am also a literary naturalist both in fiction writing and in criticism. My recent (2021) master's thesis was on the topic of literary naturalism in the fiction of Willa Cather. You will be able to find it if you try.

    I picked Cather because I didn't want to go after something that was over my head. I read one of her novels in the 1970s and liked it. I did identify her as practicing a type of naturalism that was different than that of the male literary naturalists of the age and more rooted in biological or ecological naturalism, meaning the study of living communities in real time and of what determines how the individual organism lives and dies. There was a lot of death in Cather. She did death very naturalistically.

    For another thing, I am partially of Bohemian (Czech) and Swedish descent and I thought that Cather in her Prairie Trilogy was writing about people of my blood. My forebearers were of the artisan class though. None were farmers and no collateral relatives (cousins close or distant) that I know of became farmers.

    Replies: @Che Guava

    Thanks. I hadn’t heard of Cather before. Will look into her writing and perhaps find your thesis.

    If you haven’t before, do try to check the letter and retrospective that I suggested.

    To me, as an outside observer, either dystopia would be preferable to reality in any western country. After all, neither Blair nor Huxley could have imagined a ruling class that would simply and recklessly have the people invaded.

    Much peasant, small farmer, rural labour background for me, but most close relatives, more artisan.

  • @Wild Man
    @RedPill Boomer

    Yes, I agree mostly (we are all humans, and we all have similar issues, that come out differently, due to culture and such). The Jewish collective seems to have massive issues around un-analyzed arrogance. The tendency is to kneejerk towards thinking the arrogance is warranted because of the "intense Jewish drive and their high average IQ". No. Does not compute: Show me the money. How have these cognitive attributes led to any assurance (other than wishful thinking) that other peoples' views can be perennially discounted?

    Personally, I don't find it easy to relate to Jews unless they are Jews trying to relate to goy western culture (Coen Brothers, Woody Allen). Otherwise, the basic Jewish idea is the Judaic, ... and I am pretty sure the Judaic is pretty much complete malarkey (i.e. - the Judaic stance as is filled with misplaced arrogance). I don't like that. Weirdly victorious, supposed victims, turned victimizers, emerges as the story of the Judaic. The Judaic religion is a celebration of cluster-B-type psychopathology. We all have these tendencies that require mature self-management. At the moment, the Jewish collective is the one massively suffering under this tendency, though, and they have not even gone to step one to reform their average wrongheaded spiritual stance, as is based on the massive ontological conciet (the worst sin of all) as sponsored by the Judaic. The Judaic tends to turn out arrogant bastards by the bushel-full.

    Replies: @JM

    But remember he’s a Boomer: enquiring minimally, comfortably and above all, not wanting to rock the boat, so exploring hard truths is forbidden.

  • @Wild Man
    @Ron Unz

    Ron - I was first exposed to all the JQ hype in a big way (which turns out to be much more than just hype) way back in around 2013 or so (if I recall that date correctly) at a now long defunct website called Chateau Heartiste, of all places (a site about man/woman attraction dynamics, from the perspective of a womanizer-player [in Washington, D.C., from what I could gather, but he himself never said he was stationed there] well versed in evolutionary psychology themes). That is where I learned about Kevin MacDonald's take, which led me to E.O. Wilson's take on the very likely existence of group selection for the human species (a controversial narrow topic), that otherwise helped substantiate what otherwise appeared to be these rather bizarre claims of Kevin MacDonald about the Jews.

    All this does inevitably lead to the kinds of claims made by an Edward Dutton, about higher mutational loads, all round, for humans.

    OK, .... perhaps the synergy of the various takes of Kevin MacDonald vis-a-vis E.O. Wilson vis-a-vis Edward Dutton, has much warrant, is the way to look at it I think, as an exploration (i.e. - the truth about who I really am, as a human, is the most important deeply profound question of all, for each of us). Let's embrace who we truly are for starters, type thing.

    From the imagined super-zoomed-out so-called God's-eye perspective, one can entertain the tension between the magnificent flowering of humanity (8 billion!) occurring in concert with the civilization-spun higher mutational load. What a stupendous point/counterpoint, that - eh?

    The trick here is to love oneself as well as one's brothers and sisters. Warts and all. To me, the Jewish collective, compared to others, is more-so crazy, more-so bold, more-so in possession of great chutzpah, more-so intelligent, ... and most importantly, more-so suffering from deep self-inflicted psychic wounds around 'unspoken but believed deficiency'. The arrogant are that way (arrogant) for a reason, is what I am saying. It's a weakness, not a strength. It's a covert response (a cover) upon feelings of deficiency.

    Jews very much tend towards arrogance. Way back when now, the now long defunct Chateau Heartiste maintained that this 'feeling of deficiency' (what some may describe as 'jealousy'), for the Jewish collective, was about their self-perceived facial ugliness, and otherwise goofy bodily mannerisms. Now, .... we should be a bit careful here, because within Jewry, it seems the more orthodox religious types, and their recent secular spawn, might be skewing things that way, for the entire collective (i.e. - to get my drift, imagine the Hasidics are the sweetspot of what I am referring to here). We should not lose sight of the fact that there are also many exceptionally beautiful Jewish people, too.

    OK, .... I hope you are perceiving my overall message here, then, in this comment, which is this Coles Notes: The Jews have always played an oversized part, of how we got to here (civilization with it's confounding mix of brilliance and anti-brilliance). I love myself. I love humanity. So of course, I love the Jews. But the Jews don't sufficiently love themselves, which is The Problem.

    Take Hasidics for instance. Some pretty goofy countenances there, some would say. And mannerism too, some would say. But they are the main keepers and purveyors of the western occult tradition, which isn't a nothingburger - right? So I can't help but like these guys (Hasidics) to some degree. It's the intensity they possess.

    Look at it this way: Woody Allen is a western treasure. It's true. Same goes for the Coen Brothers. We can't do without this contra-commentary, by the likes of a Woody Allen or the Coen Brothers (all 3 very sensitive people). The Jews are massively lovable. Its seems like they don't know that, or something, and then the reaction spiral has then fucked everything up.

    I know I have gone on an on about ontological humility. But that really is the key insight (towards much better resolution, upon the universe's dictate that we must genuinely love ourselves, warts and all, to prevail in even a small way, ... and as well, the universal dictate is that we must try to prevail). Once one gleans ontological humility, then it becomes completely obvious that one's allegiance should be with humanity.

    Replies: @RedPill Boomer, @Hinz, @anarchyst, @King Edward I

    What a bizarre and lame comment – one of the worst I’ve seen here on unz (other than basically 99% of comments by meamjewjew). Sensing a tribe member/crypto. Who, who really knows the tribe as a whole, would come up with such nonsense?

    The trick here is to love oneself as well as one’s brothers and sisters. Warts and all. To me, the Jewish collective, compared to others, is more-so crazy, more-so bold, more-so in possession of great chutzpah, more-so intelligent

    Bullshit. They are not “more intelligent”. If they were, then they would humiliate us in debates, and destroy us with their logic, reason, and consistency. Yet they cannot. They cannot defeat the alt right and other counter semitic voices in any debates, thus they censor us. If they were so “brilliant”, they wouldn’t need to censor everyone that refutes their jewish bullsht narratives. They also would not need to viciously promote other jews and demote more qualified and more intelligent non jews….but they do all the time. Without jews dominating the narrative via their ability to censor and dominate the msm and hollywood, their control would dwindle. They know it. That is why they are so obsessed with censoring others.

    Also, how is it “intelligent” to replace the White gentiles of Europe and the Anglosphere with infinity paki, mexican, and african migrants? Europeans have come up with something like 90% of all technological inventions, cures, medicines since 1500. I fail to see how the jewish agenda of wiping the Europeans out and replacing them with low IQ third worlders is “more-so intelligent”. Please explain that one to the readers.

    But the Jews don’t sufficiently love themselves, which is The Problem.

    jews=”anyone that criticizes individual jews, jewish power, or israel is an anti semite bigot that must be censored, punished, and lose their job. Ideally, they would be imprisoned or executed. We must make laws to stop people from criticizing jews and/or israel. Non jews need to serve jewish interests….it is in the torah. Kings and Queens should serve the jews and lick the dust from our feet. When the jewish messiah comes, each jew will get 2,800 non jewish slaves.”
    Knowing that most religious, if not almost all jews believe in such supremacist, megalomaniacal crap, how the flock could any fair-minded person seriously claim “the jews don’t sufficiently love themselves?

    Are you fecking kidding me? They worship themselves you moron. That’s what their whole religious cult is about.

    Same goes for the Coen Brothers. We can’t do without this contra-commentary, by the likes of a Woody Allen or the Coen Brothers (all 3 very sensitive people). The Jews are massively lovable.

    Yeah, yeah. Super lovable. Subverting the US and Europe so they can steal money from western taxpayers and get western politicians to do their bidding and let israel commit a genocide against civilians in Gaza. Super lovable in trying to get the US to destroy Iraq and Iran for jewish interests. Super lovable when pushing a replacement level non White immigration agenda in Europe and the Anglosphere. So “super lovable”.

    What a moron. If anything, they, and their bullsht are super hate-able. Hence the reason jews have been expelled from over 1,000 locations throughout time. They are so “lovable” that even the indians of Guatemala couldn’t stand having jewish psychopathic supremacists around.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-28992743

    Not lovable at all. Whining, annoying, self serving, arrogant, supremacist, hypocritical, and selfish? Yes. “Super lovable”? No!!!

  • @Che Guava
    @Anymike

    Alright.

    Although the gammas, deltas and epsilons are depicted at play, in prescribed leisure hours, in Huxley's novel, they are viewed from above.

    They have to ride trains to their own fields of play.

    He does mention them also engaged in compulsory erotic play. It means nothing, except keeping them under control.

    Since Huxley's dystopia has achieved total separation of the sex act from procreation, no sexual activity has any relation to anything. Including among alphas and betas. It is just fun, and for alphas and betas, social connections. Class and death acceptance training, too, are universally applied.

    John the Savage, natural child of an alpha male and a beta female, brought up in the savage reservation, only really knowing Lenina Crowe's aphorisms and Shakespeare, is totally disruptive when returned to 'civilisation'.

    I have lately found many commenters here to be very stupid, don't usually find you so.

    Also, Huxley wrote a detailed personal letter to Blair (Orwell), stating that the dystopia of the latter was very well written, and he enjoyed reading it, but it would inevitably dissolve into something like Huxley's. The letter is published and easy to find. I don't agree with it, but it is certainly worth reading.

    Huxley also wrote a long essay, Brave New World Revisited, also easy to find, well-written, you may try reading it.

    Replies: @Anymike

    A lot of people pose the question, which one will it be? Brave New World or 1984? My response is, why not both? We already have the two intermingled to a degree. We have the world of 1984 for the masses and a self-appointed Alpha overclass largely practicing eugenic breeding in the hopes of creating its own successors. Sometimes the eugenic calculations cross the boundaries of duplication and move into the territory of creating new types in the hope that these will be more capable of succeeding in the conditions which will prevail in the future. In that way, maybe breeding selection itself can be seen as kind of an arms race.

    In literature there any number of types of criticism. Just to name a few, Freudian, Marxist, formalist, structuralist, historicist and so on. Religious-based criticism is yet another type.

    When I see critical discussions of Brave New World based on interpersonal psychology it kind of rubs me the wrong way. The people who have done this kind of criticism maybe see something of themselves and the people around them in these characters in terms of their ethnic or racial type and kind of daily lives they are living.

    This kind of criticism I think fails to account for the fact that all of the people in this fictional society are artificial biological creations mired in an inescapable mediocrity and leading inauthentic and hollow lives. There is a moral horror to the whole thing which you cannot just let go over your head.

    Compare that to the world of 1984. Bad though the Big Brother dictatorship may be, life in the Oceania superstate does represent life as the human race has always known it. A tyrannical overclass which thinks with reptilian logic, a nervous ninny-neurotic middle class mired in a near-future time orientation and an often sodden and depressed proletariat and underclass.

    My approach to literature is structuralist and formalist, but my structuralism is the structuralism of social science, not literary structuralism. I am also a literary naturalist both in fiction writing and in criticism. My recent (2021) master’s thesis was on the topic of literary naturalism in the fiction of Willa Cather. You will be able to find it if you try.

    I picked Cather because I didn’t want to go after something that was over my head. I read one of her novels in the 1970s and liked it. I did identify her as practicing a type of naturalism that was different than that of the male literary naturalists of the age and more rooted in biological or ecological naturalism, meaning the study of living communities in real time and of what determines how the individual organism lives and dies. There was a lot of death in Cather. She did death very naturalistically.

    For another thing, I am partially of Bohemian (Czech) and Swedish descent and I thought that Cather in her Prairie Trilogy was writing about people of my blood. My forebearers were of the artisan class though. None were farmers and no collateral relatives (cousins close or distant) that I know of became farmers.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Che Guava
    @Anymike

    Thanks. I hadn't heard of Cather before. Will look into her writing and perhaps find your thesis.

    If you haven't before, do try to check the letter and retrospective that I suggested.

    To me, as an outside observer, either dystopia would be preferable to reality in any western country. After all, neither Blair nor Huxley could have imagined a ruling class that would simply and recklessly have the people invaded.

    Much peasant, small farmer, rural labour background for me, but most close relatives, more artisan.
  • @Fran Taubman
    @Chrisnonymous

    Agree, beyond the dumbest article. It is not even written in readable English. I guess as you can see Ron's readership has really fallen way off. He has to resuscitate old articles on 9/11 or Nazi -Jew stuff from 2019 to stoke comments. New articles barely brake 200 comments. Proof he just posted a new (Oy vey) Jews did 9/11 The like 100th article on the subject. It always brings out the crazies who say there were no planes, no dead people in the planes etc.

    Hey Ron time to bring out a new Anne Frank article or better yet your favorite of favorite Jew hatting piece on Leo Frank. Ha! Ha!. Don't tell Paul McCartney about Jewish girls being ugly. He married two of them.

    Oh and Lauren Bacall was Jewish. And if you were to ask me and most people, no one is uglier than
    Kevin McDonald.

    Replies: @King Edward I

    Hey fran,

    Relax, if you are ashkenazi, you aren’t really truly “jewish” anyways. Your female line isn’t “semitic” at all. It is European White gentile.

    https://www.livescience.com/40247-ashkenazi-jews-have-european-genes.html

    So all you ashkenazis are only mamzer half breeds anyways. Since you guys are all half European gentile, could you please do all us White gentiles a big favor and stop pushing the White genocide, and stop pushing the anti White agenda….and convince “your people” to stop doing the same?

    After all, wiping out the Europeans is wiping out half you ancestry. Thanks for the assist Fran.

  • @Z-man
    @Anonymous

    Yeah, she's attractive and I think I heard her speak once and she seemed pleasant. Maybe she has some Italian in her. Not so much the temperament but the looks. 😅

    Replies: @24th Alabama

    Naomi did admit that she once “had a little Italian” in her.
    She added that she had been drinking and couldn’t be
    sure, but guessed it was Danny De Vito or some other
    “smallish WOP.”

    •ï¿½LOL: Z-man, Richard B
  • @Odyssey
    @Bert

    Who are Ashkenazim? What is their origin?

    Replies: @Sandy Beach, @Bombercommand

    The Ashkenazi are the result of Jewish males moving to Rome and marrying Italian females. The Sephardi Jews(Middle Eastern Jews) have maintained this thesis for centuries and modern genetic analysis confirms it. The Sephardi also insist that the Ashkenazi are not “real Jews” because the line started with gentile mothers. If you think Ashkenazi Jews are ugly, take a gander at the Sephardi. They are easily recognizable by a characteristic totally weird squashed down protruding nose and a distinctly dark complexion. I have seen this both in a Jewish family from Lebanon that only came to North America in the 1960’s and a Jewish family from Deal, New Jersey that doesn’t acknowledge any Mid-East origin, exact same weird nose and bizarre dark complexion, totally unlike the Ashkenazi. BTW, the “Khazarian Hypothesis” is total bunk.

    •ï¿½Agree: Hinz
    •ï¿½Replies: @Odyssey
    @Bombercommand

    Most of what has been said is acceptable, but there is a lack of logic from end to end. Who are these 'Italian women'? How (and when) did the Jews find themselves in Central Europe? How is it possible that out of 50 K (15th century) there are 8 million Jews in Eastern Europe (20th century)? Can it be explained by an (isolated) demographic boom? How did it come to be that Ashkenazis make up more than 85% of the total number of Jews? How (when and where) did Yiddish originate?

    Replies: @Bombercommand
  • @Anonymous
    I always thought Naomi Wolf was a very beautiful woman*. And even though she was super-intelligent (Yale, Ph.D., Oxford) she was never obnoxious and always pleasant with a soothing voice.


    https://arc-anglerfish-arc2-prod-bostonglobe.s3.amazonaws.com/public/PJR3RNX46UI6DF6C3MZA7BUJEI.jpg

    �
    *And I’m not alone in that assessment. I always thought Harold Bloom was gay until I read he sexually harassed Wolf while she was a student of his at Yale. Or maybe Wolf’s beauty just turned him straight. 🤣

    Replies: @Z-man

    Yeah, she’s attractive and I think I heard her speak once and she seemed pleasant. Maybe she has some Italian in her. Not so much the temperament but the looks. 😅

    •ï¿½Replies: @24th Alabama
    @Z-man

    Naomi did admit that she once "had a little Italian" in her.
    She added that she had been drinking and couldn't be
    sure, but guessed it was Danny De Vito or some other
    "smallish WOP."
  • @Anymike
    @Che Guava

    You'd better elaborate on that. I was speaking of my take on what the society was, not commenting on the plot. I don't remember the plot that well and none of the characters grabbed me. Except for Lenina, for the obvious reason. Huxley described her as "pneumatic." What else do you need to know?

    Replies: @Che Guava

    Alright.

    Although the gammas, deltas and epsilons are depicted at play, in prescribed leisure hours, in Huxley’s novel, they are viewed from above.

    They have to ride trains to their own fields of play.

    He does mention them also engaged in compulsory erotic play. It means nothing, except keeping them under control.

    Since Huxley’s dystopia has achieved total separation of the sex act from procreation, no sexual activity has any relation to anything. Including among alphas and betas. It is just fun, and for alphas and betas, social connections. Class and death acceptance training, too, are universally applied.

    John the Savage, natural child of an alpha male and a beta female, brought up in the savage reservation, only really knowing Lenina Crowe’s aphorisms and Shakespeare, is totally disruptive when returned to ‘civilisation’.

    I have lately found many commenters here to be very stupid, don’t usually find you so.

    Also, Huxley wrote a detailed personal letter to Blair (Orwell), stating that the dystopia of the latter was very well written, and he enjoyed reading it, but it would inevitably dissolve into something like Huxley’s. The letter is published and easy to find. I don’t agree with it, but it is certainly worth reading.

    Huxley also wrote a long essay, Brave New World Revisited, also easy to find, well-written, you may try reading it.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Anymike
    @Che Guava

    A lot of people pose the question, which one will it be? Brave New World or 1984? My response is, why not both? We already have the two intermingled to a degree. We have the world of 1984 for the masses and a self-appointed Alpha overclass largely practicing eugenic breeding in the hopes of creating its own successors. Sometimes the eugenic calculations cross the boundaries of duplication and move into the territory of creating new types in the hope that these will be more capable of succeeding in the conditions which will prevail in the future. In that way, maybe breeding selection itself can be seen as kind of an arms race.

    In literature there any number of types of criticism. Just to name a few, Freudian, Marxist, formalist, structuralist, historicist and so on. Religious-based criticism is yet another type.

    When I see critical discussions of Brave New World based on interpersonal psychology it kind of rubs me the wrong way. The people who have done this kind of criticism maybe see something of themselves and the people around them in these characters in terms of their ethnic or racial type and kind of daily lives they are living.

    This kind of criticism I think fails to account for the fact that all of the people in this fictional society are artificial biological creations mired in an inescapable mediocrity and leading inauthentic and hollow lives. There is a moral horror to the whole thing which you cannot just let go over your head.

    Compare that to the world of 1984. Bad though the Big Brother dictatorship may be, life in the Oceania superstate does represent life as the human race has always known it. A tyrannical overclass which thinks with reptilian logic, a nervous ninny-neurotic middle class mired in a near-future time orientation and an often sodden and depressed proletariat and underclass.

    My approach to literature is structuralist and formalist, but my structuralism is the structuralism of social science, not literary structuralism. I am also a literary naturalist both in fiction writing and in criticism. My recent (2021) master's thesis was on the topic of literary naturalism in the fiction of Willa Cather. You will be able to find it if you try.

    I picked Cather because I didn't want to go after something that was over my head. I read one of her novels in the 1970s and liked it. I did identify her as practicing a type of naturalism that was different than that of the male literary naturalists of the age and more rooted in biological or ecological naturalism, meaning the study of living communities in real time and of what determines how the individual organism lives and dies. There was a lot of death in Cather. She did death very naturalistically.

    For another thing, I am partially of Bohemian (Czech) and Swedish descent and I thought that Cather in her Prairie Trilogy was writing about people of my blood. My forebearers were of the artisan class though. None were farmers and no collateral relatives (cousins close or distant) that I know of became farmers.

    Replies: @Che Guava
  • @Gott ist mit Unz
    @SomeDude

    That's a Semite! You're being anti-Semitic.

    Replies: @Z-man

    Yes and lol. 😆

  • @ariadna
    A good Larry Johnson interview

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAmJllMig6M

    Replies: @Z-man

    Thanks for the video.
    Larry Johnson is always good.
    Sharif of Iran is a good man. The Iranians would be wise to keep him in positions of power and also do as best they can to protect him from murderous Zionists. If it’s one thing the Izraelis hate a lot it’s another westernized English speaking diplomat from the other side taking time away from their American sounding spokesman.
    I’m afraid that Hezbolah’s missile capacity and capability has been greatly over estimated/exaggerated. I hope I’m wrong.

  • @Z-man
    @Ron Unz

    Well, she was OK looking as a young woman, but as it was stated, that's a professional studio portrait of the young Bader.
    As I comment, in my shallow moments, about some women's looks, 'The miracle of modern makeup.... and modern photography'. 😆

    Replies: @mulga mumblebrain, @24th Alabama, @Mike Tre, @Alexandros

    Yes – make up, angles, lighting, and even photo doctoring (airbrushing) only succeed in making her look not hideous.

    A sad measure for beauty indeed when the baseline is “not that bad.”

    As has been stated plenty of times before, Jewish actresses are a poor marker of “Jewish” beauty for two significant reasons: 1. 99% of them have had extensive plastic surgery, and 2. most of them benefit from being half European/non Jewish.

    Hell even Rashida Jones benefited from being half black !

  • @Odyssey
    @Mosafer Hastam

    It's a little more complicated. In brief - the language of the people who called themselves 'srb' (serbs) (=relatives, people of the same race) originated in the Palaeolithic and has continuity to this day. In Tripoli (= three fields, in Serbian) they met nomads (friendly and enemies) from the Russian steppes, who were at least a couple thousands of years behind in terms of civilization, and who accepted the local Serbian language and culture.

    Thus, in the encounter with friendly nomads, the modern Serbs (and later the rest of the Slavs who still spoke the Serbian language at that time) were born, and today they make up a sixth of Serbian genetics. From the primitive enemy nomads, who committed genocide against the natives of Europe, modern westerners arose.

    Replies: @Mosafer Hastam

    Historians like to refer to this euphemistically as ‘blood refreshment’, like the immigration of the Dorians into Ionian Greece. A sort of booster, not necessarily using violence. Ancient cemeteries in Spain suggest that at the time of the migration of the Vandals, the different cultures lived largely peacefully side by side until a common version prevailed. In the course of time, and for the sake of harmony, they just blend.

  • Don’t mind me, I’m just having a good old chuckle here imagining all the tall, muscular, toned, blond, blue-eyed handsome Aryans here reading this drivel and agreeing that Jews are ugly. There are ugly and beautiful people of all races. I’m no Adonis myself. Young Jewish women are often strikingly attractive but I do agree they don’t age well.

  • @Mosafer Hastam
    @Odyssey

    Presumably you refer to the Cucuteni - Tripyllia culture as the origin of Serbs. The idea has merit. I am always learning from your cultural-historical omniscience.

    Replies: @Odyssey

    It’s a little more complicated. In brief – the language of the people who called themselves ‘srb’ (serbs) (=relatives, people of the same race) originated in the Palaeolithic and has continuity to this day. In Tripoli (= three fields, in Serbian) they met nomads (friendly and enemies) from the Russian steppes, who were at least a couple thousands of years behind in terms of civilization, and who accepted the local Serbian language and culture.

    Thus, in the encounter with friendly nomads, the modern Serbs (and later the rest of the Slavs who still spoke the Serbian language at that time) were born, and today they make up a sixth of Serbian genetics. From the primitive enemy nomads, who committed genocide against the natives of Europe, modern westerners arose.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Mosafer Hastam
    @Odyssey

    Historians like to refer to this euphemistically as ‘blood refreshment’, like the immigration of the Dorians into Ionian Greece. A sort of booster, not necessarily using violence. Ancient cemeteries in Spain suggest that at the time of the migration of the Vandals, the different cultures lived largely peacefully side by side until a common version prevailed. In the course of time, and for the sake of harmony, they just blend.
  • @24th Alabama
    @Brooklyn Dave

    Here's my simple theory about how beauty is determined
    within an ethnic group or race. It is established over time
    as the most common or average appearing features within
    the group, and deviations are considered less attractive
    by their degree of difference from that average.

    As ethnic groups were exposed to other groups, the process
    of comparing them began, much to the detriment of the
    Blacks whose features differed most from the average
    features of Europeans and Asians.

    Since many European Jews, aside from their dress or accents,
    are similar to White Gentiles, the ones who have retained
    Mideast features are seen as lacking beauty or a handsome
    appearance. At the same time, we have to explain why some
    men and women who are "exotic" are considered to be
    appealing by the opposite sex, and how how personality
    affects our perception of beauty.

    Many may disagree, but I doubt that there is an absolute or
    objective standard of human beauty, while noting the obvious,
    that our physical form is limited by functionality.

    Replies: @Odyssey, @Mosafer Hastam

    In general, ‘beauty’ is equated with a healthy appearance, i.e. symmetry in appearance and a pleasant (= confidence-inspiring) facial expression.
    Sephardic Jews (such as Ofra Haza) fall into this category, as do many Armenian Christians, despite inbreeding due to cultural isolation.

    •ï¿½Agree: 24th Alabama
  • @Odyssey
    Those who write about the Nordic features probably do not know where from (and when) the 'Nordics' came to Scandinavia. Those who think that Germans are Nordics are also wrong.

    The typical 'German look' comes from the Prussians who are not Germanics, because they are Europeans and the (original) Germans (no one knows what they were called before coming to Europe) are Asians, who came and took the land from the natives and assimilated many of them.

    It would be interesting if someone could describe what the Germans (aka proto-panzers who still don't know the meaning of their European name) looked like when they arrived in Europe, as well as whether the nomads, ancestors of the modern Westerners who came from the Russian steppes, were white. Please add this dilemma to the previous three topics I proposed for discussion.

    Replies: @Mosafer Hastam, @Sandy Beach

    Presumably you refer to the Cucuteni – Tripyllia culture as the origin of Serbs. The idea has merit. I am always learning from your cultural-historical omniscience.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Odyssey
    @Mosafer Hastam

    It's a little more complicated. In brief - the language of the people who called themselves 'srb' (serbs) (=relatives, people of the same race) originated in the Palaeolithic and has continuity to this day. In Tripoli (= three fields, in Serbian) they met nomads (friendly and enemies) from the Russian steppes, who were at least a couple thousands of years behind in terms of civilization, and who accepted the local Serbian language and culture.

    Thus, in the encounter with friendly nomads, the modern Serbs (and later the rest of the Slavs who still spoke the Serbian language at that time) were born, and today they make up a sixth of Serbian genetics. From the primitive enemy nomads, who committed genocide against the natives of Europe, modern westerners arose.

    Replies: @Mosafer Hastam
  • @Ron Unz
    One slightly odd element of this piece was the praise for Amy Wax. I've never met or had any real dealings with her, but my strong impression is that her ideological positions are almost exactly the same as those of Nathan Cofnas, who was ferociously attacked here.

    If Cofnas had tenure and sufficient courage, I'd think that he would have been glad to invite Jared Taylor to speak before some students just like Wax did. However, I very much doubt that he'd ever invite Kevin MacDonald, nor would Wax for exactly the same reasons.

    One reason for my suspicions is that last year I somehow got added to an email distribution list that Wax was sending out to about a hundred or so of her friends and allies, mostly academics and journalists, and from what I remember she and all the others were ranting and raving about American "antisemitism" in ways that even the ADL might find embarrassing.

    Don't forget that Rabbi Kahane got his start fighting with the blacks in New York City, so perhaps Langdon might consider him an ideological ally. But I doubt that Kahane and his friends wouldt return the favor, and instead they'd be much more likely to try to assassinate anyone connected with Langdon's Occidental Observer website.

    Replies: @Brás Cubas, @Wild Man, @Chrisnonymous, @Bill Jones, @Anonymous, @anonymous, @Richard B, @eah, @Odyssey

    We all look forward to your understanding and explanation of the term ‘kike’. Here, Tobi joined that research (Nobody wants. Nobody likes …kikes, kikes, kikes!). Here, in addition to circle (kikel) and kiki, we also learned from Tobi about the third (mainstream) version:

    Thought to be from Yiddish קײַקל (kaykl, “circleâ€). In the early 20th century, non-English-speaking Jews that immigrated to the United States would sign papers with a circle as opposed to a more common X. The latter symbol was associated by these Jews with the Christian cross, a symbol that represented to them millennia of persecution.[1]

    This is the dominant etymological theory, but there are others, in particular a contraction from the documented phrase ‘Ikey-Kikey’, an American-origin reduplication of Ikey, British-English pejorative for Jews after the prevalence of the name Isaac.[2]

    I believe that you will come with something completely new, but, alternatively, you can show us which of the previous versions is the most likely (or wittiest). Thanks in advance.

  • Remember the iconic monumental film Ben Hur (1959) where director William Wyler despaired that almost all the main characters had blue eyes (Stephen Boyd had to wear dark contact lenses to play a nasty Roman).
    In general, since the 1960s it has been de rigeur to cast diabolical villains with Nordic-looking people, even though all practical experience speaks against it. However, it has become part of the left-wing narrative.

    •ï¿½Agree: HdC
  • @24th Alabama
    @Brooklyn Dave

    Here's my simple theory about how beauty is determined
    within an ethnic group or race. It is established over time
    as the most common or average appearing features within
    the group, and deviations are considered less attractive
    by their degree of difference from that average.

    As ethnic groups were exposed to other groups, the process
    of comparing them began, much to the detriment of the
    Blacks whose features differed most from the average
    features of Europeans and Asians.

    Since many European Jews, aside from their dress or accents,
    are similar to White Gentiles, the ones who have retained
    Mideast features are seen as lacking beauty or a handsome
    appearance. At the same time, we have to explain why some
    men and women who are "exotic" are considered to be
    appealing by the opposite sex, and how how personality
    affects our perception of beauty.

    Many may disagree, but I doubt that there is an absolute or
    objective standard of human beauty, while noting the obvious,
    that our physical form is limited by functionality.

    Replies: @Odyssey, @Mosafer Hastam

    the ones who have retained Mideast features are seen as lacking beauty or a handsome appearance.

    Sweethome, have they retained the features and how could they retain them? Maybe the ancestors of some modern Jews never had anything to do with the Mideast?

    There are also universal laws of aesthetics (eg, proportions, etc.).

  • Those who write about the Nordic features probably do not know where from (and when) the ‘Nordics’ came to Scandinavia. Those who think that Germans are Nordics are also wrong.

    The typical ‘German look‘ comes from the Prussians who are not Germanics, because they are Europeans and the (original) Germans (no one knows what they were called before coming to Europe) are Asians, who came and took the land from the natives and assimilated many of them.

    It would be interesting if someone could describe what the Germans (aka proto-panzers who still don’t know the meaning of their European name) looked like when they arrived in Europe, as well as whether the nomads, ancestors of the modern Westerners who came from the Russian steppes, were white. Please add this dilemma to the previous three topics I proposed for discussion.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Mosafer Hastam
    @Odyssey

    Presumably you refer to the Cucuteni - Tripyllia culture as the origin of Serbs. The idea has merit. I am always learning from your cultural-historical omniscience.

    Replies: @Odyssey
    , @Sandy Beach
    @Odyssey

    They were all white scythians, in short. German is what the Romans called these pure tribes ie "germane". The people from the Russian steppes were dispersed Hebrew Israelites from the northern house that was carried away in the times of Assyria. And those who left earlier, moving into Asia Minor.

    All of these "caucasians" (those who crossed north over the caucasus) and their ilk moved towards Western and Central Europe around the year 0 AD or thereafter. That's when the Romans started into contact with these newly arrived peoples in "Germania", and of course there's all kinds of other people let's say "Europeans" who were already present.

    Basically what professor Tolkien had in mind with the horse mounted "Rohirrim", notice the Hebrew plural that he also identified with "Haradrim". These proto saxons or Isaac's Sons are at the foundation of British and English speaking people everywhere today. That all goes back to ancient Scythia and Parthia

    Replies: @Odyssey
  • @Sandy Beach
    @Odyssey

    It's literally the same origin as everybody else, Asia Minor the Cacusus and Persia

    Replies: @Odyssey

    It’s literally the same origin as everybody else, Asia Minor the Cacusus and Persia.

    Who are the everybody else?
    Does this mean that Ashenazim don’t really exist as a separate group, but it’s just an arbitrary name without any real substance?
    What about Sephardim? Do they exist as a group with specific features? What is actually distinction between them?

    •ï¿½Replies: @Sandy Beach
    @Odyssey

    Everybody else means the rest of Jewish dispersion and history. Sephardi and Ashkenazi often interchange and it depends on the mixture of ancestral population, obviously. You ask way too many bewildered questions instead of just observing the human condition like any anthropologist could easily do.

    Carlton S Coon published a very well-known book back in the 1930s or so, full of photos and so forth. Discusses the racial origins of the Jewish people. Obviously the Ashkenazi people "exist" meaning there was a large number of Yiddish speakers in Eastern Europe until recently. It's a hugely varied population with many origins, language and culture have a way of spreading.

    The best analogy is Hispanic, which includes anything from Latin Europe Mediterranean to Celtic over to South America and Central America, all kinds of different people. What unifies them is ancestral connection to Spain the language and Roman Catholicism.

    The Sephardic people by definition spoke Ladino and are included within the Hispanic world. It's clear from anthropology and history that Eastern European Jews derive from Asia Minor, the old Persian empire, the caucuses, Western Asia. The Sephardic trend came from Mesopotamia and the original Phoenician colonies, speaking generally. A lot of "Jewish" is the conversion of similar people towards what must have been the superior culture, the same way other nations became Latin or German speaking instead of something else.

    Islam and arabism have the very similar effect, as this civilizational culture and language with its religion spread across the middle lands of the old world. Some people got their culture from the Arabs and have henceforth been Muslims even though they are Indonesians etc

    https://www.theapricity.com/snpa/racesofeurope.htm

    Replies: @Odyssey
    , @Sandy Beach
    @Odyssey

    More specifically:

    https://www.theapricity.com/snpa/chapter-XI7.htm

    Traces the anthropological origins of modern jewry
  • @Bert
    @Dutch Boy

    This discussion is not about making fun; it is about making sense of a putative group trait. Two notable traits of the Ashkenazim have been "made sense of" by considering how natural and sexual selection could have brought them into existence because of the unique economic niche of the Ashkenazim in Eastern Europe. Most prominent is the trait of high verbal and mathematical (but not spatial) intelligence, which could have been plausibly of selective advantage during business dealings. The second and less discussed trait is sociopathy, which could have clearly been of selective advantage in allowing maximum extraction of profits, especially when dealing with counterparties who are in a subordinate social position, e.g., Slavic peasants.

    Consider a third putative trait of the Ashkenazim: age-related changes of countenance that make them appear less "approachable." Approachable is defined as "welcoming, easy to talk to." I posit that Ashkenazi men, the extractors of Slavic peasant kopecks, were more effective in that role when they appeared "unapproachable." Heavy eyebrows, curl of lip, a permanent sneer on the face could have been adaptations of the Ashkenazi businessmen to forestall complaints, objections and entreaties of the Slavic counterparties of their businesses. Under this explanation, any reduction in beauty as young adults would have, as the ontogenetic basis of late-middle-age unwelcoming countenances, been unavoidable.

    Aging Northern Europeans, in contrast, do not appear to be transmitting any negative vibes.
    https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-highland-scottish-clan-old-man-in-traditional-highland-dress-at-the-31485293.html?imageid=FE6C5FFC-63B3-4955-BAD0-3BFEA0F81FBB&p=271805&pn=1&searchId=7d3de0ebddde339738e51319386c5a05&searchtype=0

    Replies: @Odyssey, @Dutch Boy, @Dutch Boy, @Sandy Beach, @Hinz

    Comparatively high verbal and low spatial intelligence we also measure in women and blacks.
    From all three groups we know they don’t produce verbals of value, just babble.

  • @Brooklyn Dave
    Wow! This crowd is really worked up over Jewish punims. It makes me wonder. Langdon, not surprisingly, see the Aryan archetype as the prime example of ultimate beauty (blonde, blue eyed, etc) Would he say that Sophia Loren, or Catherine Zeta Jones fall into the less than department because they are not blonde, blue eyed?

    Replies: @Anonymous Goy, @24th Alabama

    Here’s my simple theory about how beauty is determined
    within an ethnic group or race. It is established over time
    as the most common or average appearing features within
    the group, and deviations are considered less attractive
    by their degree of difference from that average.

    As ethnic groups were exposed to other groups, the process
    of comparing them began, much to the detriment of the
    Blacks whose features differed most from the average
    features of Europeans and Asians.

    Since many European Jews, aside from their dress or accents,
    are similar to White Gentiles, the ones who have retained
    Mideast features are seen as lacking beauty or a handsome
    appearance. At the same time, we have to explain why some
    men and women who are “exotic” are considered to be
    appealing by the opposite sex, and how how personality
    affects our perception of beauty.

    Many may disagree, but I doubt that there is an absolute or
    objective standard of human beauty, while noting the obvious,
    that our physical form is limited by functionality.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Odyssey
    @24th Alabama


    the ones who have retained Mideast features are seen as lacking beauty or a handsome appearance.
    �
    Sweethome, have they retained the features and how could they retain them? Maybe the ancestors of some modern Jews never had anything to do with the Mideast?

    There are also universal laws of aesthetics (eg, proportions, etc.).
    , @Mosafer Hastam
    @24th Alabama

    In general, ‘beauty’ is equated with a healthy appearance, i.e. symmetry in appearance and a pleasant (= confidence-inspiring) facial expression.
    Sephardic Jews (such as Ofra Haza) fall into this category, as do many Armenian Christians, despite inbreeding due to cultural isolation.
  • @Fin of a cobra
    @HdC


    there is a school of thought that promulgates the idea that an aged face reflects the life lived.
    �
    Yes, I agree. That is exactly what the following quote by one the greatest thinkers who ever lived promulgates:

    let us ask ourselves what kind of physiognomy we are to expect from those in whose hearts there has very rarely arisen throughout their lives anything but petty, mean, and miserable thoughts, and vulgar, selfish, envious, wicked, and malicious desires. Each of these has set its mark on the face during the time that it lasted. Through much repetition, all these marks have in the course of time become deeply wrinkled and furrowed, so to speak. -- "On Physiognomy", Parerga and Paralipomena, Schopenhauer
    �
    Schopenhauer had a whole metaphysics of beauty which is also worth a look, but it had mostly to do with art. But I think we can apply what he thought about art, to some degree, also to people. And what is interesting and germane to the above article is that he thought there was a clear distinction between the "ugly" -- which he thought might even have its place in art -- and the "repellent", as in the quote below:

    There is also a negative pretty, which is even more reprehensible than the positive pretty we have just been speaking about: this is the repellent. Like the pretty in the proper sense, it awakens the viewer’s will and thereby suppresses pure aesthetic contemplation. But this negative pretty arouses a violent repulsion, a disgust: it awakens the will by presenting objects that fill it with horror. It has long been recognized, therefore, that it is not admissible in art, although the ugly itself, as long as it is not repellent, can find its proper place in it. -- as quoted in Michel Houellebecq's In the Presence of Schopenhauer
    �
    This distinction is key in the discussion above, because the classical Jew look is not merely ugly -- it is downright repellent. It provokes a strong emotional reaction which attacks the viscera directly, if not the amygdala: the fight-flight-freeze response is triggered almost automatically. Perhaps this is just another reason why, as Schopenhauer also said, a "small, isolated, capricious, hierarchical (i.e., ruled by false notions), obscure people, like the Jews, [is] despised by the great contemporary nations of the East and of the West."

    Replies: @mulga mumblebrain, @Poupon Marx, @Brás Cubas

    I suppose you think Michel Houellebecq does not have a “classical” Gentile look.

  • @Vergissmeinnicht
    Ruth B. Ginsburg a "tchotchke"‽ Wow!
    .
    .
    .

    Much or even most of aesthetics is still “scientifically baseless†today. Does Cofnas regard that as a good reason to dismiss this field and reject all of its political and moral conclusions? I hope he doesn’t.
    �
    Aesthetics and Ethics = two peas in a pod.

    What's deemed 'right' and 'wrong' is due to Evolution. Hence, cannot be objective;
    What's deemed 'pretty' and 'ugly' is due to Evolution, as well.¹ Hence, cannot be objective.

    Nihilism is all there is.
    (I could be wrong, for sure. I'd love to, personally.)

    1. Facial/Body symmetry, youth etc.

    Replies: @BertB

    What’s deemed ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ is due to Evolution. Hence, cannot be objective;

    Huh? Is that an axiom? “Evolution can never be a method to find good concepts?” What kind of reasoning is this?

    Evolution does not automatically result in good things, but systems with genetic optimisation can do a superior job in finding stuff that may otherwise be almost impossible to find.

    It may actually be used by a lazy god (‘let it run for some time, it will get there in the end’). Kind-of my way of gardening. I think my gardening is objectively good.

  • @KJB
    Funny article, a good break!

    The 150 Most Beautiful Jewish Actresses in Hollywood

    https://www.imdb.com/list/ls064975609/

    Replies: @Richard B

    A few on this list are not full Jewish and some aren’t Jewish at all. Unless they’re hiding something. Who knows? Who cares? It does nothing to deter from TL’s point.

  • @Jim H
    @Dr. Rock

    'Black women tend to get super fat. It’s just reality, just like them having big butts.' -- Dr Rock

    The medical term is steatopygia. Pretty sure I learnt that term from Aldous Huxley. Follow the science, my friend.

    Saw an example just last weekend. 'The ratio' -- waist circumference ideally equals two-thirds of hip circumference, as in the Sixties expression '36-24-36' [accompanied by suggestive hand gestures and a provocative leer] -- becomes hideous and horrifying when it degenerates to 1:2.

    And 1:1 is equally b-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-d. :-0

    Replies: @24th Alabama

    @fran taubman, not you Jim H

    His daughter was killed? That will put him in a good mood,
    good enough to kill thousands of Jews,
    maybe even some in NYC.

  • @Z-man
    @Ron Unz

    Well, she was OK looking as a young woman, but as it was stated, that's a professional studio portrait of the young Bader.
    As I comment, in my shallow moments, about some women's looks, 'The miracle of modern makeup.... and modern photography'. 😆

    Replies: @mulga mumblebrain, @24th Alabama, @Mike Tre, @Alexandros

    And, long before Photoshop, studio photographers were adept at “touch-up,
    air brushing” and other techniques to make sure customers were pleased.
    Who wants to show-off their moles, pimples, cross-eyes and nose hairs?
    Ruth was gifted a Gentile nose.

    •ï¿½Agree: Z-man
  • @Odyssey
    @Bert

    Who are Ashkenazim? What is their origin?

    Replies: @Sandy Beach, @Bombercommand

    It’s literally the same origin as everybody else, Asia Minor the Cacusus and Persia

    •ï¿½Replies: @Odyssey
    @Sandy Beach


    It's literally the same origin as everybody else, Asia Minor the Cacusus and Persia.
    �
    Who are the everybody else?
    Does this mean that Ashenazim don't really exist as a separate group, but it's just an arbitrary name without any real substance?
    What about Sephardim? Do they exist as a group with specific features? What is actually distinction between them?

    Replies: @Sandy Beach, @Sandy Beach
  • @Bert
    @Dutch Boy

    This discussion is not about making fun; it is about making sense of a putative group trait. Two notable traits of the Ashkenazim have been "made sense of" by considering how natural and sexual selection could have brought them into existence because of the unique economic niche of the Ashkenazim in Eastern Europe. Most prominent is the trait of high verbal and mathematical (but not spatial) intelligence, which could have been plausibly of selective advantage during business dealings. The second and less discussed trait is sociopathy, which could have clearly been of selective advantage in allowing maximum extraction of profits, especially when dealing with counterparties who are in a subordinate social position, e.g., Slavic peasants.

    Consider a third putative trait of the Ashkenazim: age-related changes of countenance that make them appear less "approachable." Approachable is defined as "welcoming, easy to talk to." I posit that Ashkenazi men, the extractors of Slavic peasant kopecks, were more effective in that role when they appeared "unapproachable." Heavy eyebrows, curl of lip, a permanent sneer on the face could have been adaptations of the Ashkenazi businessmen to forestall complaints, objections and entreaties of the Slavic counterparties of their businesses. Under this explanation, any reduction in beauty as young adults would have, as the ontogenetic basis of late-middle-age unwelcoming countenances, been unavoidable.

    Aging Northern Europeans, in contrast, do not appear to be transmitting any negative vibes.
    https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-highland-scottish-clan-old-man-in-traditional-highland-dress-at-the-31485293.html?imageid=FE6C5FFC-63B3-4955-BAD0-3BFEA0F81FBB&p=271805&pn=1&searchId=7d3de0ebddde339738e51319386c5a05&searchtype=0

    Replies: @Odyssey, @Dutch Boy, @Dutch Boy, @Sandy Beach, @Hinz

    The whole thing is wildly delusional, you could take almost anybody and just change their clothing besides location and it easily seems like something else. Most of it is just impressions based on fallacies that people seem to come up with.

    Ashkenazi is not specifically distinct from any other Jewish race, and people are virtually interchangeable with the differences being more European or more Arab. It’s like comparing North and yesterday or trees with socks, all things could be intersecting a different points together all at the same time.

  • @Priss Factor

    For example, both of them are groups that, in my opinion, don’t belong in White societies partly because of the resentment they feel about superior White beauty.
    �
    Jews and blacks have superiority/inferiority complex.

    Jews believe themselves to be intellectually superior and stronger-willed, and that may well be true. They see whites as essentially shallow and less intelligent, easy to push around once you push the right buttons.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ReHhtQ6yXM4

    And blacks see themselves as superior to whites in athleticism, oratory, charisma, soulfulness, musicality, and 'muh dick' and 'muh booty'.
    And many whites worship blacks as the tougher, badass, awesome race, just like many whites venerate Jews as a race of wits, geniuses, big thinkers, and rich folks. Whites got Jungle Fever and Jungle Faith. White women lust after black men, and white guys worship blackness as 'cool'. Whites love rap music.

    So, the problem isn't just Jewish and black resentment but white awe of Jewishness and blackness, the two pillars(with homos being the third pillar) of current conception of Western Civilization.

    Consider. Even when Brits argue that Muslims shouldn't be welcome in the UK because Islam isn't compatible with Western Values, they are not talking about white identity, white unity, and white race-ist pride. They are saying the Muslims aren't sufficiently reverent toward Jews, homos, and blacks.

    As for Sailer, he may discuss Jewish resentments, but it isn't to reject Jews but to assure them that their hostility is uncalled for because whites just love, adore, and respect Jews.
    In other words, don't be so upset that you guys are less attractive than whites because you guys are superior where it really counts: wit and will, and that's why whites will always grovel at your feet.

    Replies: @Richard B, @Sandy Beach

    That is not even remotely true, the British who resent Muslim presence are clearly responding to Muslim aggression and crime. Not for some weird “woke” reasons

  • @bjondo
    Yid prominent in facial surgery to hide the ugly s0ul.

    Change face, change name.

    5ds

    Replies: @Anonymous Goy

    It’s also the motive for the exceptionally high rate of intermarriage among Jews in the United States, so as to better blend in with the oblivious and insouciant white European-American population. Ashkenazim are already heavily mixed with European genes, but when you place most Ashkenazi women in a room full of Minnesota, Scandinavian blondes they stick out like a hoodrat on Wall Street.

  • @Brooklyn Dave
    Wow! This crowd is really worked up over Jewish punims. It makes me wonder. Langdon, not surprisingly, see the Aryan archetype as the prime example of ultimate beauty (blonde, blue eyed, etc) Would he say that Sophia Loren, or Catherine Zeta Jones fall into the less than department because they are not blonde, blue eyed?

    Replies: @Anonymous Goy, @24th Alabama

    Catherine Zeta-Jones is a prostitute who married Michael Douglas for his money and to advance her career through his Jewish/Hollywood network connections. She’s the epitome of a casting couch whore.

  • @Bert
    @Dutch Boy

    This discussion is not about making fun; it is about making sense of a putative group trait. Two notable traits of the Ashkenazim have been "made sense of" by considering how natural and sexual selection could have brought them into existence because of the unique economic niche of the Ashkenazim in Eastern Europe. Most prominent is the trait of high verbal and mathematical (but not spatial) intelligence, which could have been plausibly of selective advantage during business dealings. The second and less discussed trait is sociopathy, which could have clearly been of selective advantage in allowing maximum extraction of profits, especially when dealing with counterparties who are in a subordinate social position, e.g., Slavic peasants.

    Consider a third putative trait of the Ashkenazim: age-related changes of countenance that make them appear less "approachable." Approachable is defined as "welcoming, easy to talk to." I posit that Ashkenazi men, the extractors of Slavic peasant kopecks, were more effective in that role when they appeared "unapproachable." Heavy eyebrows, curl of lip, a permanent sneer on the face could have been adaptations of the Ashkenazi businessmen to forestall complaints, objections and entreaties of the Slavic counterparties of their businesses. Under this explanation, any reduction in beauty as young adults would have, as the ontogenetic basis of late-middle-age unwelcoming countenances, been unavoidable.

    Aging Northern Europeans, in contrast, do not appear to be transmitting any negative vibes.
    https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-highland-scottish-clan-old-man-in-traditional-highland-dress-at-the-31485293.html?imageid=FE6C5FFC-63B3-4955-BAD0-3BFEA0F81FBB&p=271805&pn=1&searchId=7d3de0ebddde339738e51319386c5a05&searchtype=0

    Replies: @Odyssey, @Dutch Boy, @Dutch Boy, @Sandy Beach, @Hinz

    “Aging Northern Europeans, in contrast, do not appear to be transmitting any negative vibes.” I wish. I am pretty Northern European and my wife used to chide me about my tendency to intimidate people with my usual demeanor. My defense was that my face is just that way. I’m not smiley and people would interpret my facial expressions as bored or hostile. Jewish unapproachability is a function of their general hostility toward their non-Jewish counterparts, not their facial features.

  • @Fin of a cobra
    @HdC


    there is a school of thought that promulgates the idea that an aged face reflects the life lived.
    �
    Yes, I agree. That is exactly what the following quote by one the greatest thinkers who ever lived promulgates:

    let us ask ourselves what kind of physiognomy we are to expect from those in whose hearts there has very rarely arisen throughout their lives anything but petty, mean, and miserable thoughts, and vulgar, selfish, envious, wicked, and malicious desires. Each of these has set its mark on the face during the time that it lasted. Through much repetition, all these marks have in the course of time become deeply wrinkled and furrowed, so to speak. -- "On Physiognomy", Parerga and Paralipomena, Schopenhauer
    �
    Schopenhauer had a whole metaphysics of beauty which is also worth a look, but it had mostly to do with art. But I think we can apply what he thought about art, to some degree, also to people. And what is interesting and germane to the above article is that he thought there was a clear distinction between the "ugly" -- which he thought might even have its place in art -- and the "repellent", as in the quote below:

    There is also a negative pretty, which is even more reprehensible than the positive pretty we have just been speaking about: this is the repellent. Like the pretty in the proper sense, it awakens the viewer’s will and thereby suppresses pure aesthetic contemplation. But this negative pretty arouses a violent repulsion, a disgust: it awakens the will by presenting objects that fill it with horror. It has long been recognized, therefore, that it is not admissible in art, although the ugly itself, as long as it is not repellent, can find its proper place in it. -- as quoted in Michel Houellebecq's In the Presence of Schopenhauer
    �
    This distinction is key in the discussion above, because the classical Jew look is not merely ugly -- it is downright repellent. It provokes a strong emotional reaction which attacks the viscera directly, if not the amygdala: the fight-flight-freeze response is triggered almost automatically. Perhaps this is just another reason why, as Schopenhauer also said, a "small, isolated, capricious, hierarchical (i.e., ruled by false notions), obscure people, like the Jews, [is] despised by the great contemporary nations of the East and of the West."

    Replies: @mulga mumblebrain, @Poupon Marx, @Brás Cubas

    I believe you could better spend your time on contemplation and consideration of solutions to the Gentiles’ problem of sheer and elemental survival. We have a major piece of machinery that is out of service and needs repair, spare parts, overhaul, and restoration. We have spent endless decades and centuries describing, delineating, analyzing and inspecting the “Jewish Question”. I don’t think there is anything more to expose, except another episode of evil and perfidy that has bubbled up from the tar pit.

    I have for some years proposed several plans, in phases and detail, plus referred to sources that have provided concrete guidance. The vast majority of herded Goyim prefer to describe the problem, layering and layering the same rugs on the floor. By now, they are higher than the roof.

    Nobody that I have encountered has the framework or initial movement of tactics or strategist. In the marine world, in the middle of the ocean, you don’t get paid to endlessly describe what is wrong, and condemn the manufacturer, the designer, the people that served before you, etc., etc. You are there on YOUR ship, which is your life support, to fix whatever problems exist, make the machine or system produce an output of its function, and resurrect it. You go to sea with what you have. If you don’t have the spare parts, your attempt to make them, rebuild them {e.g., weld, machine/modify, or create a whole part out of billet stock. Or, you make alterations and deviate from standard practice.

    “We need to ________”(generalization, simple one-step) is 4 cards of a suite to a flush. You don’t get any share of the the pot. The Heebie Jeebies lay down specific plans, phased in, interconnecting, which are causes and effects, detailed, with concrete resources, consonance of people and objects and tools. Coordinated. While the Gentile presumes that his prayers and The Personal Savior will arrive just before midnight and miracles will be performed. The Rapture.

    Oh, I know. All that is required to set off a massive counter force and rising tide of push back and reclamation of the Gentiles’ lost and stolen articles is…….Name The Jew. That’s right. Name the cause of the casualty or fault that shut down your machine and the lights will come back on and you will be moving again through the water. Well, we are all Frenchmen now. Easily distracted and relying on ersatz Reality to mark our trails.

  • @Bert
    @Dutch Boy

    This discussion is not about making fun; it is about making sense of a putative group trait. Two notable traits of the Ashkenazim have been "made sense of" by considering how natural and sexual selection could have brought them into existence because of the unique economic niche of the Ashkenazim in Eastern Europe. Most prominent is the trait of high verbal and mathematical (but not spatial) intelligence, which could have been plausibly of selective advantage during business dealings. The second and less discussed trait is sociopathy, which could have clearly been of selective advantage in allowing maximum extraction of profits, especially when dealing with counterparties who are in a subordinate social position, e.g., Slavic peasants.

    Consider a third putative trait of the Ashkenazim: age-related changes of countenance that make them appear less "approachable." Approachable is defined as "welcoming, easy to talk to." I posit that Ashkenazi men, the extractors of Slavic peasant kopecks, were more effective in that role when they appeared "unapproachable." Heavy eyebrows, curl of lip, a permanent sneer on the face could have been adaptations of the Ashkenazi businessmen to forestall complaints, objections and entreaties of the Slavic counterparties of their businesses. Under this explanation, any reduction in beauty as young adults would have, as the ontogenetic basis of late-middle-age unwelcoming countenances, been unavoidable.

    Aging Northern Europeans, in contrast, do not appear to be transmitting any negative vibes.
    https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-highland-scottish-clan-old-man-in-traditional-highland-dress-at-the-31485293.html?imageid=FE6C5FFC-63B3-4955-BAD0-3BFEA0F81FBB&p=271805&pn=1&searchId=7d3de0ebddde339738e51319386c5a05&searchtype=0

    Replies: @Odyssey, @Dutch Boy, @Dutch Boy, @Sandy Beach, @Hinz

    “Aging Northern Europeans, in contrast, do not appear to be transmitting any negative vibes.” I wish. I am pretty Northern European and my wife used to chide me about my tendency to intimidate people with my usual demeanor. My defense was that my face is just that way. I’m not smiley and people would interpret my facial expressions as bored or hostile.

  • @Fin of a cobra
    @HdC


    there is a school of thought that promulgates the idea that an aged face reflects the life lived.
    �
    Yes, I agree. That is exactly what the following quote by one the greatest thinkers who ever lived promulgates:

    let us ask ourselves what kind of physiognomy we are to expect from those in whose hearts there has very rarely arisen throughout their lives anything but petty, mean, and miserable thoughts, and vulgar, selfish, envious, wicked, and malicious desires. Each of these has set its mark on the face during the time that it lasted. Through much repetition, all these marks have in the course of time become deeply wrinkled and furrowed, so to speak. -- "On Physiognomy", Parerga and Paralipomena, Schopenhauer
    �
    Schopenhauer had a whole metaphysics of beauty which is also worth a look, but it had mostly to do with art. But I think we can apply what he thought about art, to some degree, also to people. And what is interesting and germane to the above article is that he thought there was a clear distinction between the "ugly" -- which he thought might even have its place in art -- and the "repellent", as in the quote below:

    There is also a negative pretty, which is even more reprehensible than the positive pretty we have just been speaking about: this is the repellent. Like the pretty in the proper sense, it awakens the viewer’s will and thereby suppresses pure aesthetic contemplation. But this negative pretty arouses a violent repulsion, a disgust: it awakens the will by presenting objects that fill it with horror. It has long been recognized, therefore, that it is not admissible in art, although the ugly itself, as long as it is not repellent, can find its proper place in it. -- as quoted in Michel Houellebecq's In the Presence of Schopenhauer
    �
    This distinction is key in the discussion above, because the classical Jew look is not merely ugly -- it is downright repellent. It provokes a strong emotional reaction which attacks the viscera directly, if not the amygdala: the fight-flight-freeze response is triggered almost automatically. Perhaps this is just another reason why, as Schopenhauer also said, a "small, isolated, capricious, hierarchical (i.e., ruled by false notions), obscure people, like the Jews, [is] despised by the great contemporary nations of the East and of the West."

    Replies: @mulga mumblebrain, @Poupon Marx, @Brás Cubas

    Schopenhauer is presaging Orwell-‘At fifty everybody has the face they deserve’.

  • @Wokechoke
    @Charles Martel France

    Good missing of the point here.

    The entire edifice of Hollywood is a bunch of ETs normalizing themselves around the goyim.

    So Felicity Jones plays a basilisk Jewess. So Weiss plays the hideous Etc…Minnie Driver plays a coded Jewess etc…it’s essential Spielberg normalizing Jewish attitudes for the suckers. Also at least the Cohen Brothers are a little more obvious about when they do it. Like the Sobchak character in Lebowski.

    Replies: @mulga mumblebrain

    The Judaisation of Western societies proceeds apace, the latest facet being the normalisation of genocide and criminalisation of opposition to it, so long as it is being performed by the ‘right’ people.

  • @Z-man
    @Ron Unz

    Well, she was OK looking as a young woman, but as it was stated, that's a professional studio portrait of the young Bader.
    As I comment, in my shallow moments, about some women's looks, 'The miracle of modern makeup.... and modern photography'. 😆

    Replies: @mulga mumblebrain, @24th Alabama, @Mike Tre, @Alexandros

    In fact, the actress to portray the ‘esteemed’ RBG looks pretty close to her as a young woman.

    •ï¿½Agree: Z-man
  • @Dr. Rock
    This is all, actually quite funny-

    In this new, kinder, softer, more gentle era of "fat acceptance", and anti-racism, and a hundred other bullshit but supposedly "real" new movements, "don't judge a book by it's cover", people are STILL pretty hung up about looks, their looks!

    Black women tend to get super fat. It's just reality, just like them having big butts.

    Mexican girls can be gorgeous, until about 14-16, then they usually get very fat and plump too.

    A lot of German women can have a very stern, almost mean look.

    But the jews... everyone on the planet knows the stereotypical jewish aesthetic, but don't you dare mention it! "Better listen up, maybe he'll say blessed are the big noses" (Life of Brian)

    Sure, they can run the world, own the banks, rule the media, found and run Hollywood, but don't mention the fact that many have big noses!

    Why?

    Because nobody is allowed to criticize jews for anything! Well, except other jews, sometimes, like the entire show Seinfeld. There they were allowed to talk about almost every jewish stereotype- his uncle that thought every sleight was because of anti-semitism, his dad using a calculator to figure a tip down to the penny, George's parents, yelling at each other 24/7, or the overbearing jewish mom's lamenting and deriding their sons'.

    Even got into "Shiks-appeal". "Elaine, did you know that jewish rabbis can marry?" They spoofed "becoming a man" at their bar mitzvah's. Jerry was a passionate germ-a-phobe, who dated almost exclusively gentile women, and even made out during Schindler's List!

    However, nobody else can do any of that shit, or the jews will call you a Hitler, and try to destroy you.

    Replies: @Jim H, @Sandy Beach

    Isn’t that the basis of normal politeness? You people are uncivil and degenerate, morbidly obsessed with other people.

    •ï¿½Troll: Richard B
  • This is completely delusional and all of these faces look relatively normal, certainly better looking than 50% of the average population in Europe or anywhere else. Nathan Cofnas looks equally Irish, Polish, German, British or anything else besides Jewish which is not itself in particular breed necessarily. All those Israeli soldiers who fell in the war are often very handsome people, you’re being wildly dishonest. Nobody could possibly believe any of this and asking any random sample of human beings would produce a completely different result than this stupid article.

    That woman who is accused of spreading lies about some college students or whatever is pretty fine looking actually, I mean the average lower class human being is not pretty and she’s attractive by any measure. I wonder what Tobias Langdon looks like, that he’s so weirdly obsessed with other people and whether they accept things or not. Far as I can tell Nathan Cofnas is normal looking and only weirdos judge other people that closely. I guess the author is gay like most Nazis.

    Sounds like the author is wildly jealous and probably an ugly little cretin no doubt

    •ï¿½LOL: Corrupt
    •ï¿½Troll: Richard B
  • Rush says:

    Physical attractiveness is rare, rare enough for it to have commercial value for women. Most people are ordinary, some Ok, others not so. Mutational load that Dutton Perhaps ugly Jews are noticed because Jews as a whole tend to be in the public eye to a relatively greater degree, eg show business, than other nationalities.

  • @Ron Unz
    @Brás Cubas


    Aside from this, it’s not very reasonable to compare the beauty of two women based on photos in which the contestants have differing ages. Here are some photos of Ruth Bader when she was young:
    https://time.com/3714172/ruth-bader-ginsburg-young-photos/
    �
    You're absolutely correct. I'd never realized that Ruth Bader was so nice-looking when she was young.

    https://api.time.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/ruth-bader-ginsburg-supreme-court-justice-young-photo-31.jpg

    Replies: @SafeNow, @Verymuchalive, @turtle, @The Last Adam, @Dutch Boy, @bjondo, @Z-man

    Well, she was OK looking as a young woman, but as it was stated, that’s a professional studio portrait of the young Bader.
    As I comment, in my shallow moments, about some women’s looks, ‘The miracle of modern makeup…. and modern photography’. 😆

    •ï¿½Agree: Mike Tre
    •ï¿½Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
    @Z-man

    In fact, the actress to portray the 'esteemed' RBG looks pretty close to her as a young woman.
    , @24th Alabama
    @Z-man

    And, long before Photoshop, studio photographers were adept at "touch-up,
    air brushing" and other techniques to make sure customers were pleased.
    Who wants to show-off their moles, pimples, cross-eyes and nose hairs?
    Ruth was gifted a Gentile nose.
    , @Mike Tre
    @Z-man

    Yes - make up, angles, lighting, and even photo doctoring (airbrushing) only succeed in making her look not hideous.

    A sad measure for beauty indeed when the baseline is "not that bad."

    As has been stated plenty of times before, Jewish actresses are a poor marker of "Jewish" beauty for two significant reasons: 1. 99% of them have had extensive plastic surgery, and 2. most of them benefit from being half European/non Jewish.

    Hell even Rashida Jones benefited from being half black !
    , @Alexandros
    @Z-man

    Not really. That is a one in a million picture. If you check the other pictures on that site she looks plenty horrid already in her early 20s.

    Felicity Jones on the other hand is one of the prettiest girls the world has to offer. To have her play this gremlin Jew is an insult.
  • @Che Guava
    @Anymike

    Since you largely misremember it, you may try re-reading Huxley's novel.

    Replies: @Anymike

    You’d better elaborate on that. I was speaking of my take on what the society was, not commenting on the plot. I don’t remember the plot that well and none of the characters grabbed me. Except for Lenina, for the obvious reason. Huxley described her as “pneumatic.” What else do you need to know?

    •ï¿½Replies: @Che Guava
    @Anymike

    Alright.

    Although the gammas, deltas and epsilons are depicted at play, in prescribed leisure hours, in Huxley's novel, they are viewed from above.

    They have to ride trains to their own fields of play.

    He does mention them also engaged in compulsory erotic play. It means nothing, except keeping them under control.

    Since Huxley's dystopia has achieved total separation of the sex act from procreation, no sexual activity has any relation to anything. Including among alphas and betas. It is just fun, and for alphas and betas, social connections. Class and death acceptance training, too, are universally applied.

    John the Savage, natural child of an alpha male and a beta female, brought up in the savage reservation, only really knowing Lenina Crowe's aphorisms and Shakespeare, is totally disruptive when returned to 'civilisation'.

    I have lately found many commenters here to be very stupid, don't usually find you so.

    Also, Huxley wrote a detailed personal letter to Blair (Orwell), stating that the dystopia of the latter was very well written, and he enjoyed reading it, but it would inevitably dissolve into something like Huxley's. The letter is published and easy to find. I don't agree with it, but it is certainly worth reading.

    Huxley also wrote a long essay, Brave New World Revisited, also easy to find, well-written, you may try reading it.

    Replies: @Anymike
  • @The Last Adam
    @Ron Unz

    Decades of hateful thought have turned RBG into a Lizard-Queen, obviously.

    Replies: @Z-man

    LOL 😆 and agree. ðŸ‘

  • @Bert
    @Dutch Boy

    This discussion is not about making fun; it is about making sense of a putative group trait. Two notable traits of the Ashkenazim have been "made sense of" by considering how natural and sexual selection could have brought them into existence because of the unique economic niche of the Ashkenazim in Eastern Europe. Most prominent is the trait of high verbal and mathematical (but not spatial) intelligence, which could have been plausibly of selective advantage during business dealings. The second and less discussed trait is sociopathy, which could have clearly been of selective advantage in allowing maximum extraction of profits, especially when dealing with counterparties who are in a subordinate social position, e.g., Slavic peasants.

    Consider a third putative trait of the Ashkenazim: age-related changes of countenance that make them appear less "approachable." Approachable is defined as "welcoming, easy to talk to." I posit that Ashkenazi men, the extractors of Slavic peasant kopecks, were more effective in that role when they appeared "unapproachable." Heavy eyebrows, curl of lip, a permanent sneer on the face could have been adaptations of the Ashkenazi businessmen to forestall complaints, objections and entreaties of the Slavic counterparties of their businesses. Under this explanation, any reduction in beauty as young adults would have, as the ontogenetic basis of late-middle-age unwelcoming countenances, been unavoidable.

    Aging Northern Europeans, in contrast, do not appear to be transmitting any negative vibes.
    https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-highland-scottish-clan-old-man-in-traditional-highland-dress-at-the-31485293.html?imageid=FE6C5FFC-63B3-4955-BAD0-3BFEA0F81FBB&p=271805&pn=1&searchId=7d3de0ebddde339738e51319386c5a05&searchtype=0

    Replies: @Odyssey, @Dutch Boy, @Dutch Boy, @Sandy Beach, @Hinz

    Who are Ashkenazim? What is their origin?

    •ï¿½Replies: @Sandy Beach
    @Odyssey

    It's literally the same origin as everybody else, Asia Minor the Cacusus and Persia

    Replies: @Odyssey
    , @Bombercommand
    @Odyssey

    The Ashkenazi are the result of Jewish males moving to Rome and marrying Italian females. The Sephardi Jews(Middle Eastern Jews) have maintained this thesis for centuries and modern genetic analysis confirms it. The Sephardi also insist that the Ashkenazi are not "real Jews" because the line started with gentile mothers. If you think Ashkenazi Jews are ugly, take a gander at the Sephardi. They are easily recognizable by a characteristic totally weird squashed down protruding nose and a distinctly dark complexion. I have seen this both in a Jewish family from Lebanon that only came to North America in the 1960's and a Jewish family from Deal, New Jersey that doesn't acknowledge any Mid-East origin, exact same weird nose and bizarre dark complexion, totally unlike the Ashkenazi. BTW, the "Khazarian Hypothesis" is total bunk.

    Replies: @Odyssey
  • A good Larry Johnson interview


    Video Link

    •ï¿½Replies: @Z-man
    @ariadna

    Thanks for the video.
    Larry Johnson is always good.
    Sharif of Iran is a good man. The Iranians would be wise to keep him in positions of power and also do as best they can to protect him from murderous Zionists. If it's one thing the Izraelis hate a lot it's another westernized English speaking diplomat from the other side taking time away from their American sounding spokesman.
    I'm afraid that Hezbolah's missile capacity and capability has been greatly over estimated/exaggerated. I hope I'm wrong.
  • Yid prominent in facial surgery to hide the ugly s0ul.

    Change face, change name.

    5ds

    •ï¿½Replies: @Anonymous Goy
    @bjondo

    It's also the motive for the exceptionally high rate of intermarriage among Jews in the United States, so as to better blend in with the oblivious and insouciant white European-American population. Ashkenazim are already heavily mixed with European genes, but when you place most Ashkenazi women in a room full of Minnesota, Scandinavian blondes they stick out like a hoodrat on Wall Street.
  • @Priss Factor

    For example, both of them are groups that, in my opinion, don’t belong in White societies partly because of the resentment they feel about superior White beauty.
    �
    Jews and blacks have superiority/inferiority complex.

    Jews believe themselves to be intellectually superior and stronger-willed, and that may well be true. They see whites as essentially shallow and less intelligent, easy to push around once you push the right buttons.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ReHhtQ6yXM4

    And blacks see themselves as superior to whites in athleticism, oratory, charisma, soulfulness, musicality, and 'muh dick' and 'muh booty'.
    And many whites worship blacks as the tougher, badass, awesome race, just like many whites venerate Jews as a race of wits, geniuses, big thinkers, and rich folks. Whites got Jungle Fever and Jungle Faith. White women lust after black men, and white guys worship blackness as 'cool'. Whites love rap music.

    So, the problem isn't just Jewish and black resentment but white awe of Jewishness and blackness, the two pillars(with homos being the third pillar) of current conception of Western Civilization.

    Consider. Even when Brits argue that Muslims shouldn't be welcome in the UK because Islam isn't compatible with Western Values, they are not talking about white identity, white unity, and white race-ist pride. They are saying the Muslims aren't sufficiently reverent toward Jews, homos, and blacks.

    As for Sailer, he may discuss Jewish resentments, but it isn't to reject Jews but to assure them that their hostility is uncalled for because whites just love, adore, and respect Jews.
    In other words, don't be so upset that you guys are less attractive than whites because you guys are superior where it really counts: wit and will, and that's why whites will always grovel at your feet.

    Replies: @Richard B, @Sandy Beach

    Ooops! Someone just dropped their kosher card for all to see.

    PF writes the following:

    Jews and blacks have superiority/inferiority complex.

    and then proceeds to talk only about their sense of superiority, failing to realize that it is itself a collective response to their inferiority complex by his own admission. But instead of talking about that PF talks about white inferiority. As if the whites here at TUR feel inferior to either blacks or Jews.

    Like I said, someone just dropped their kosher card for all to see.

  • Bert says:
    @Dutch Boy
    @Ron Unz

    Making fun of a person's appearance is childish. There are good-looking and ugly people in every group. It is the religion and culture of Jews that is the proper target for criticism, not their facial features.

    Replies: @Bert

    This discussion is not about making fun; it is about making sense of a putative group trait. Two notable traits of the Ashkenazim have been “made sense of” by considering how natural and sexual selection could have brought them into existence because of the unique economic niche of the Ashkenazim in Eastern Europe. Most prominent is the trait of high verbal and mathematical (but not spatial) intelligence, which could have been plausibly of selective advantage during business dealings. The second and less discussed trait is sociopathy, which could have clearly been of selective advantage in allowing maximum extraction of profits, especially when dealing with counterparties who are in a subordinate social position, e.g., Slavic peasants.

    Consider a third putative trait of the Ashkenazim: age-related changes of countenance that make them appear less “approachable.” Approachable is defined as “welcoming, easy to talk to.” I posit that Ashkenazi men, the extractors of Slavic peasant kopecks, were more effective in that role when they appeared “unapproachable.” Heavy eyebrows, curl of lip, a permanent sneer on the face could have been adaptations of the Ashkenazi businessmen to forestall complaints, objections and entreaties of the Slavic counterparties of their businesses. Under this explanation, any reduction in beauty as young adults would have, as the ontogenetic basis of late-middle-age unwelcoming countenances, been unavoidable.

    Aging Northern Europeans, in contrast, do not appear to be transmitting any negative vibes.
    https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-highland-scottish-clan-old-man-in-traditional-highland-dress-at-the-31485293.html?imageid=FE6C5FFC-63B3-4955-BAD0-3BFEA0F81FBB&p=271805&pn=1&searchId=7d3de0ebddde339738e51319386c5a05&searchtype=0

    •ï¿½Replies: @Odyssey
    @Bert

    Who are Ashkenazim? What is their origin?

    Replies: @Sandy Beach, @Bombercommand
    , @Dutch Boy
    @Bert

    "Aging Northern Europeans, in contrast, do not appear to be transmitting any negative vibes." I wish. I am pretty Northern European and my wife used to chide me about my tendency to intimidate people with my usual demeanor. My defense was that my face is just that way. I'm not smiley and people would interpret my facial expressions as bored or hostile.
    , @Dutch Boy
    @Bert

    "Aging Northern Europeans, in contrast, do not appear to be transmitting any negative vibes." I wish. I am pretty Northern European and my wife used to chide me about my tendency to intimidate people with my usual demeanor. My defense was that my face is just that way. I'm not smiley and people would interpret my facial expressions as bored or hostile. Jewish unapproachability is a function of their general hostility toward their non-Jewish counterparts, not their facial features.
    , @Sandy Beach
    @Bert

    The whole thing is wildly delusional, you could take almost anybody and just change their clothing besides location and it easily seems like something else. Most of it is just impressions based on fallacies that people seem to come up with.

    Ashkenazi is not specifically distinct from any other Jewish race, and people are virtually interchangeable with the differences being more European or more Arab. It's like comparing North and yesterday or trees with socks, all things could be intersecting a different points together all at the same time.
    , @Hinz
    @Bert

    Comparatively high verbal and low spatial intelligence we also measure in women and blacks.
    From all three groups we know they don't produce verbals of value, just babble.
  • @MEH 0910

    “Point and splutter.†I think it was Steve Sailer who devised that term to describe a common tactic of the left.
    �
    "Point and sputter" is the term that Steve uses.

    https://twitter.com/Steve_Sailer/status/1839073629104910799

    Soon:
    https://www.theguardian.com/profile/wilson-jason

    https://wordynerdbird.com/2021/02/07/easily-confused-words-sputter-vs-splutter/

    Easily Confused Words: Sputter vs. Splutter
    [...]
    These two words are easily confused, not just because they sound so similar, but also because they can both relate to the way in which people speak.
    [...]
    Both suggest a degree of incoherence or inability to express oneself in a composed manner. The difference is in the manner of expression: sputter is more explosive and suggestive of anger or violence, while splutter suggests confusion that comes from excitement or struggling to find the right words.
    [...]
    When writing about how people speak, the choice between sputter and splutter is one of nuance and tone rather than being right or wrong.
    �

    Replies: @Badger Down

    Something like the difference between a burp and a belch.

  • Funny article, a good break!

    The 150 Most Beautiful Jewish Actresses in Hollywood

    https://www.imdb.com/list/ls064975609/

    •ï¿½Replies: @Richard B
    @KJB

    A few on this list are not full Jewish and some aren't Jewish at all. Unless they're hiding something. Who knows? Who cares? It does nothing to deter from TL's point.
  • @Charles Martel France
    @Chrisnonymous




    https://nettv4u.com/imagine/ellen-barkin.jpg

    �



    https://media-cldnry.s-nbcnews.com/image/upload/t_fit-1000w,f_auto,q_auto:best/newscms/2020_50/3434777/201210-natalie-portman-jm-1049.jpg

    �

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    Good missing of the point here.

    The entire edifice of Hollywood is a bunch of ETs normalizing themselves around the goyim.

    So Felicity Jones plays a basilisk Jewess. So Weiss plays the hideous Etc…Minnie Driver plays a coded Jewess etc…it’s essential Spielberg normalizing Jewish attitudes for the suckers. Also at least the Cohen Brothers are a little more obvious about when they do it. Like the Sobchak character in Lebowski.

    •ï¿½Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
    @Wokechoke

    The Judaisation of Western societies proceeds apace, the latest facet being the normalisation of genocide and criminalisation of opposition to it, so long as it is being performed by the 'right' people.
  • @Verymuchalive
    @Ron Unz

    I must agree with you on that, Mr Unz.
    But that was likely before she was under the complete grip of Zionism and feminism. Maleficent ideas warp the soul, that is certainly true. But often they warp the countenance as well.
    Here is a photo of a younger Victoria Nuland.

    https://c8.alamy.com/comp/2K6JCNT/official-portrait-of-victoria-nuland-us-permanent-representative-to-the-north-atlantic-treaty-organization-nato-2K6JCNT.jpg

    Replies: @Bert

    Agree. And letting gluttony rub off on one does not help either.

  • @Odyssey
    I read the text and will skim the comments later. What can be concluded? Many things we think we know, we really don't. Not only the term kikes which etymology is shown in the text:

    https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/kike

    I wonder if Ron will confirm that explanation in his current research or if he will find the one that is really right. That ignorance is only the tip of the invisible iceberg of our ignorance. It also refers to stereotype about Jewish ugliness and stereotypic Shylockish caricatures. Two examples that come to mind are Weinstein and Jonathan Greenblatt. It is forgotten that Jews are not a race, nor do they have the same origin, even though the mainstream tries to convince us otherwise.

    According to that theory, Ashkenazi Jews do not exist as a separate group, even though they make up 85% of the world's Jews and represent the majority in Israel as well. Someone beat me to it above with a picture of a young Victoria Nuland. Are her ancestors from Palestine?

    So, in addition to the name kikes, we don't even know the true origin of the Jews. Is it possible (with reference to the Irish case in the US) that from 50 K in the 15th century, 8 million Jews arose in Eastern Europe, only by a demographic baby boom in the context of economic hardship, wars, diseases and pogroms? (Those interested can read the comment in Open Thread #10 (item #93).

    So, in summary, we have two (related) topics for discussion - the true meaning of the term kikes and the true origin of the Jews.
    Here's one random and illustrative male example - Tony Curtis (some like it hot).

    https://www.moma.org/d/assets/W1siZiIsIjIwMjEvMDgvMzEveWRvaGxhMW9wX1RvbnlfQ3VydGlzXzE1LmpwZyJdLFsicCIsImNvbnZlcnQiLCItcXVhbGl0eSA5MCAtcmVzaXplIDIwMDB4MjAwMFx1MDAzZSJdXQ/Tony_Curtis_15.jpg?sha=8df31737b97b5e56

    Replies: @Odyssey

    In fact, Jones could not look less Jewish if she tried. This girl is so Aryan…

    Jones is not an Aryan (just like panzers). In addition to kikes and the true origin of the Jews, it is a third case for discussion and something we do not know but arrogantly think we do.