');
The Unz Review •ï¿½An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library •ï¿½B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


�Remember My InformationWhy?
�Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Alastair Crooke Anatoly Karlin Andrew Anglin Andrew Joyce Audacious Epigone Boyd D. Cathey C.J. Hopkins E. Michael Jones Eric Margolis Eric Striker Fred Reed Gilad Atzmon Godfree Roberts Gregory Hood Guillaume Durocher Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir James Kirkpatrick James Thompson Jared Taylor John Derbyshire Jonathan Cook Jung-Freud Karlin Community Kevin Barrett Kevin MacDonald Lance Welton Larry Romanoff Laurent Guyénot Linh Dinh Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Kersey Pepe Escobar Peter Frost Philip Giraldi Razib Khan Ron Unz Steve Sailer The Saker Tobias Langdon Trevor Lynch A. Graham A. J. Smuskiewicz A Southerner Academic Research Group UK Staff Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Agha Hussain Ahmad Al Khaled Ahmet Öncü Alain De Benoist Alan Macleod Albemarle Man Alex Graham Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alexander Jacob Alexander Wolfheze Alfred McCoy Alison Weir Allan Wall Allegra Harpootlian Amalric De Droevig Ambrose Kane Amr Abozeid Anand Gopal Anastasia Katz Andre Damon Andre Vltchek Andreas Canetti Andrei Martyanov Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andrew Hamilton Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Napolitano Andrew S. Fischer Andy Kroll Angie Saxon Ann Jones Anna Tolstoyevskaya Anne Wilson Smith Anonymous Anonymous American Anonymous Attorney Anonymous Occidental Anthony Boehm Anthony Bryan Anthony DiMaggio Tony Hall Antiwar Staff Antonius Aquinas Antony C. Black Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor AudaciousEpigone Augustin Goland Austen Layard Ava Muhammad Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Kissin Barry Lando Barton Cockey Beau Albrecht Belle Chesler Ben Fountain Ben Freeman Ben Sullivan Benjamin Villaroel Bernard M. Smith Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Blake Archer Williams Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Book Brad Griffin Bradley Moore Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brett Wilkins Brian Dew Brian McGlinchey Brian R. Wright Brittany Smith C.D. Corax Cara Marianna Carl Boggs Carl Horowitz Carolyn Yeager Cat McGuire Catherine Crump César Keller Chalmers Johnson Chanda Chisala Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlie O'Neill Charlottesville Survivor Chase Madar Chauke Stephan Filho Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Chris Woltermann Christian Appy Christophe Dolbeau Christopher DeGroot Christopher Donovan Christopher Ketcham Chuck Spinney Civus Non Nequissimus CODOH Editors Coleen Rowley Colin Liddell Cooper Sterling Craig Murray Cynthia Chung D.F. Mulder Dahr Jamail Dakota Witness Dan E. Phillips Dan Sanchez Daniel Barge Daniel McAdams Daniel Vinyard Danny Sjursen Dave Chambers Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Boyajian David Bromwich David Chibo David Chu David Gordon David Haggith David Irving David L. McNaron David Lorimer David Martin David North David Stockman David Vine David Walsh David William Pear David Yorkshire Dean Baker Declan Hayes Dennis Dale Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Diego Ramos Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Dmitriy Kalyagin Donald Thoresen Alan Sabrosky Dr. Ejaz Akram Dr. Ridgely Abdul Mu’min Muhammad Dries Van Langenhove Eamonn Fingleton Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Edward Curtin Edward Dutton Egbert Dijkstra Egor Kholmogorov Ekaterina Blinova Ellen Brown Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Emil Kirkegaard Emilio García Gómez Emma Goldman Enzo Porter Eric Draitser Eric Paulson Eric Peters Eric Rasmusen Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Gant Eugene Girin Eugene Kusmiak Eve Mykytyn F. Roger Devlin Fadi Abu Shammalah Fantine Gardinier Federale Fenster Fergus Hodgson Finian Cunningham The First Millennium Revisionist Fordham T. Smith Former Agent Forum Francis Goumain Frank Tipler Franklin Lamb Franklin Stahl Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Gary Corseri Gary Heavin Gary North Gary Younge Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Galloway George Koo George Mackenzie George Szamuely Georgianne Nienaber Gilbert Cavanaugh Gilbert Doctorow Giles Corey Glen K. Allen Glenn Greenwald A. Beaujean Agnostic Alex B. Amnestic Arcane Asher Bb Bbartlog Ben G Birch Barlow Canton ChairmanK Chrisg Coffee Mug Darth Quixote David David B David Boxenhorn DavidB Diana Dkane DMI Dobeln Duende Dylan Ericlien Fly Gcochran Godless Grady Herrick Jake & Kara Jason Collins Jason Malloy Jason�s Jeet Jemima Joel John Emerson John Quiggin JP Kele Kjmtchl Mark Martin Matoko Kusanagi Matt Matt McIntosh Michael Vassar Miko Ml Ole P-ter Piccolino Rosko Schizmatic Scorpius Suman TangoMan The Theresa Thorfinn Thrasymachus Wintz Gonzalo Lira Graham Seibert Grant M. Dahl Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Greg Klein Gregg Stanley Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Conte Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Gunnar Alfredsson Gustavo Arellano Hank Johnson Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Hans Vogel Harri Honkanen Heiner Rindermann Henry Cockburn Hewitt E. Moore Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Howe Abbot-Hiss Hubert Collins Hugh Kennedy Hugh McInnish Hugh Moriarty Hugo Dionísio Hunter DeRensis Hunter Wallace Huntley Haverstock Ian Fantom Igor Shafarevich Ira Chernus Ivan Kesić J. Alfred Powell J.B. Clark J.D. Gore J. Ricardo Martins Jacek Szela Jack Antonio Jack Dalton Jack Kerwick Jack Krak Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen Jake Bowyer James Bovard James Carroll James Carson Harrington James Chang James Dunphy James Durso James Edwards James Fulford James Gillespie James Hanna James J. O'Meara James K. Galbraith James Karlsson James Lawrence James Petras Jane Lazarre Jane Weir Janice Kortkamp Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Cannon Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jayant Bhandari JayMan Jean Bricmont Jean Marois Jean Ranc Jef Costello Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey D. Sachs Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jesse Mossman JHR Writers Jim Daniel Jim Fetzer Jim Goad Jim Kavanagh Jim Smith JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Dackman Joe Lauria Joel S. Hirschhorn Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Harrison Sims John Helmer John Hill John Huss John J. Mearsheimer John Jackson John Kiriakou John Macdonald John Morgan John Patterson John Leonard John Pilger John Q. Publius John Rand John Reid John Ryan John Scales Avery John Siman John Stauber John T. Kelly John Taylor John Titus John Tremain John V. Walsh John Wear John Williams Jon Else Jon Entine Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Revusky Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Sawyer Jonathan Schell Jordan Henderson Jordan Steiner Joseph Kay Joseph Kishore Joseph Sobran Josephus Tiberius Josh Neal Jeshurun Tsarfat Juan Cole Judith Coburn Julian Bradford Julian Macfarlane K.J. Noh Kacey Gunther Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Karl Haemers Karl Nemmersdorf Karl Thorburn Kees Van Der Pijl Keith Woods Kelley Vlahos Kenn Gividen Kenneth Vinther Kerry Bolton Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin Michael Grace Kevin Rothrock Kevin Sullivan Kevin Zeese Kshama Sawant Larry C. Johnson Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Lawrence Erickson Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Leonard C. Goodman Leonard R. Jaffee Liam Cosgrove Lidia Misnik Lilith Powell Linda Preston Lipton Matthews Liv Heide Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett Louis Farrakhan Lydia Brimelow M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maciej Pieczyński Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marco De Wit Marcus Alethia Marcus Apostate Marcus Cicero Marcus Devonshire Margaret Flowers Margot Metroland Marian Evans Mark Allen Mark Bratchikov-Pogrebisskiy Mark Crispin Miller Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Gullick Mark H. Gaffney Mark Lu Mark Perry Mark Weber Marshall Yeats Martin Jay Martin K. O'Toole Martin Webster Martin Witkerk Mary Phagan-Kean Matt Cockerill Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Caldwell Matthew Ehret Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max Jones Max North Max Parry Max West Maya Schenwar Merlin Miller Metallicman Michael A. Roberts Michael Averko Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Hoffman Michael Masterson Michael Quinn Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Michelle Malkin Miko Peled Mnar Muhawesh Moon Landing Skeptic Morgan Jones Morris V. De Camp Mr. Anti-Humbug Muhammed Abu Murray Polner N. Joseph Potts Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Nathan Cofnas Nathan Doyle Ned Stark Neil Kumar Nelson Rosit Nicholas R. Jeelvy Nicholas Stix Nick Griffin Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Nicolás Palacios Navarro Nils Van Der Vegte Noam Chomsky NOI Research Group Nomi Prins Norman Finkelstein Norman Solomon OldMicrobiologist Oliver Boyd-Barrett Oliver Williams Oscar Grau P.J. Collins Pádraic O'Bannon Patrice Greanville Patrick Armstrong Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Patrick Lawrence Patrick Martin Patrick McDermott Patrick Whittle Paul Bennett Paul Cochrane Paul De Rooij Paul Edwards Paul Engler Paul Gottfried Paul Larudee Paul Mitchell Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Paul Souvestre Paul Tripp Pedro De Alvarado Peter Baggins Ph.D. Peter Bradley Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Lee Peter Van Buren Philip Kraske Philip Weiss Pierre M. Sprey Pierre Simon Povl H. Riis-Knudsen Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Qasem Soleimani Rachel Marsden Raches Radhika Desai Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ralph Raico Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Ramzy Baroud Randy Shields Raul Diego Ray McGovern Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Reginald De Chantillon Rémi Tremblay Rev. Matthew Littlefield Ricardo Duchesne Richard Cook Richard Falk Richard Foley Richard Galustian Richard Houck Richard Hugus Richard Knight Richard Krushnic Richard McCulloch Richard Silverstein Richard Solomon Rick Shenkman Rick Sterling Rita Rozhkova Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Debrus Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Fisk Robert Hampton Robert Henderson Robert Inlakesh Robert LaFlamme Robert Lindsay Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Stark Robert Stevens Robert Trivers Robert Wallace Robert Weissberg Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Rolo Slavskiy Romana Rubeo Romanized Visigoth Ron Paul Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning RT Staff Ruuben Kaalep Ryan Andrews Ryan Dawson Sabri Öncü Salim Mansur Sam Dickson Sam Francis Sam Husseini Sayed Hasan Scot Olmstead Scott Howard Scott Ritter Servando Gonzalez Sharmine Narwani Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Sidney James Sietze Bosman Sigurd Kristensen Sinclair Jenkins Southfront Editor Spencer Davenport Spencer J. Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen F. Cohen Stephen J. Rossi Stephen J. Sniegoski Stephen Paul Foster Sterling Anderson Steve Fraser Steve Keen Steve Penfield Steven Farron Steven Yates Subhankar Banerjee Susan Southard Sydney Schanberg Talia Mullin Tanya Golash-Boza Taxi Taylor McClain Taylor Young Ted O'Keefe Ted Rall The Crew The Zman Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas A. Fudge Thomas Anderson Thomas Hales Thomas Dalton Thomas Ertl Thomas Frank Thomas Hales Thomas Jackson Thomas O. Meehan Thomas Steuben Thomas Zaja Thorsten J. Pattberg Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Timothy Vorgenss Timur Fomenko Tingba Muhammad Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Engelhardt Tom Mysiewicz Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Torin Murphy Tracy Rosenberg Travis LeBlanc Vernon Thorpe Virginia Dare Vito Klein Vladimir Brovkin Vladimir Putin Vladislav Krasnov Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walt King Walter E. Block Warren Balogh Washington Watcher Washington Watcher II Wayne Allensworth Wei Ling Chua Wesley Muhammad White Man Faculty Whitney Webb Wilhelm Kriessmann Wilhem Ivorsson Will Jones Will Offensicht William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Wyatt Peterson Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen Yaroslav Podvolotskiy Yvonne Lorenzo Zhores Medvedev
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2020 Election Academia American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Benjamin Netanyahu Black Crime Black Lives Matter Blacks Britain Censorship China China/America Conspiracy Theories Covid Culture/Society Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy Gaza Hamas History Holocaust Ideology Immigration IQ Iran Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Joe Biden NATO Nazi Germany Neocons Open Thread Political Correctness Race/Ethnicity Russia Science Syria Ukraine Vladimir Putin World War II 汪精衛 100% Jussie-free Content 1984 2008 Election 2012 Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2022 Election 2024 Election 23andMe 9/11 9/11 Commission Report Abortion Abraham Lincoln Abu Mehdi Muhandas Achievement Gap ACLU Acting White Adam Schiff Addiction ADL Admin Administration Admixture Adolf Hitler Advertising AfD Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Age Age Of Malthusian Industrialism Agriculture AI AIPAC Air Force Aircraft Carriers Airlines Airports Al Jazeera Al Qaeda Al-Shifa Alain Soral Alan Clemmons Alan Dershowitz Albania Albert Einstein Albion's Seed Alcoholism Alejandro Mayorkas Alex Jones Alexander Dugin Alexander Vindman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Alexei Navalny Algeria Ali Dawabsheh Alien And Sedition Acts Alison Nathan Alt Right Altruism Amazon Amazon.com America America First American Civil War American Dream American History American Indians American Israel Public Affairs Committee American Jews American Left American Nations American Nations American Presidents American Prisons American Renaissance Amerindians Amish Amnesty Amnesty International Amos Hochstein Amy Klobuchar Amygdala Anarchism Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Greece Ancient Rome Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Bacevich Andrew Sullivan Andrew Yang Anglo-America Anglo-imperialism Anglo-Saxons Anglos Anglosphere Angola Animal IQ Animal Rights Wackos Animals Ann Coulter Anne Frank Anthony Blinken Anthony Fauci Anthrax Anthropology Anti-Defamation League Anti-Gentilism Anti-Semites Anti-Vaccination Anti-Vaxx Anti-white Animus Antifa Antifeminism Antiracism Antisemitism Antisemitism Awareness Act Antisocial Behavior Antizionism Antony Blinken Apartheid Apartheid Israel Apollo's Ascent Appalachia Apple Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaeogenetics Archaeology Archaic DNA Architecture Arctic Arctic Sea Ice Melting Argentina Ariel Sharon Armageddon War Armenia Armenian Genocide Army Arnold Schwarzenegger Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Jensen Arthur Lichte Artificial Intelligence Arts/Letters Aryans Aryeh Lightstone Ash Carter Ashkenazi Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians Assassination Assassinations Assimilation Atheism Atlanta AUMF Auschwitz Australia Australian Aboriginals Autism Automation Avril Haines Ayn Rand Azerbaijan Azov Brigade Babes And Hunks Baby Gap Balfour Declaration Balkans Balochistan Baltics Baltimore Riots Banjamin Netanyahu Banking Industry Banking System Banks #BanTheADL Barack Obama Baseball Statistics Bashar Al-Assad Basketball #BasketOfDeplorables BBC BDS BDS Movement Beauty Beethoven Behavior Genetics Behavioral Genetics Bela Belarus Belgium Belgrade Embassy Bombing Ben Cardin Ben Hodges Ben Rhodes Ben Shapiro Ben Stiller Benny Gantz Bernard Henri-Levy Bernie Sanders Betsy DeVos Betty McCollum Bezalel Smotrich Bezalel Yoel Smotrich Biden BigPost Bilateral Relations Bilingual Education Bill Clinton Bill De Blasio Bill Gates Bill Kristol Bill Maher Bill Of Rights Billionaires Billy Graham Bioethics Biology Bioweapons Birmingham Birth Rate Bitcoin Black Community Black History Month Black Muslims Black Panthers Black People Black Slavery BlackLivesMatter BlackRock Blake Masters Blank Slatism BLM Blog Blogging Blogosphere Blond Hair Blood Libel Blue Eyes Boasian Anthropology Boeing Boers Bolshevik Revolution Bolshevik Russia Books Boomers Border Wall Boris Johnson Bosnia Boycott Divest And Sanction Brain Drain Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Bret Stephens Brett McGurk Bretton Woods Brexit Brezhnev Bri Brian Mast BRICs Brighter Brains British Empire British Labour Party British Politics Buddhism Build The Wall Bulldog Bush Business Byzantine Caitlin Johnstone California Californication Camp Of The Saints Canada #Cancel2022WorldCupinQatar Cancer Candace Owens Capitalism Carl Von Clausewitz Carlos Slim Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Cars Carthaginians Catalonia Catholic Church Catholicism Catholics Cats Caucasus CDC Ceasefire Cecil Rhodes Census Central Asia Central Intelligence Agency Chanda Chisala Chaos And Order Charles De Gaulle Charles Manson Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charlie Hebdo Charlottesville Checheniest Chechen Of Them All Chechens Chechnya Chernobyl Chetty Chicago Chicagoization Chicken Hut Child Abuse Children Chile China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese IQ Chinese Language Christian Zionists Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Christopher Wray Chuck Schumer CIA Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil Rights Movement Civil War Civilization Clannishness Clash Of Civilizations Class Classical Antiquity Classical History Classical Music Clayton County Climate Climate Change Clint Eastwood Clintons Coal Coalition Of The Fringes Cognitive Elitism Cognitive Science Cold Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Powell Colin Woodard College Admission College Football Colonialism Color Revolution Columbia University Columbus Comic Books Communism Computers Confederacy Confederate Flag Congress Conquistador-American Conservatism Conservative Movement Conservatives Conspiracy Theory Constantinople Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumerism Controversial Book Convergence Core Article Cornel West Corona Corporatism Corruption COTW Counterpunch Country Music Cousin Marriage Cover Story COVID-19 Craig Murray Creationism Crime Crimea Crispr Critical Race Theory Cruise Missiles Crusades Crying Among The Farmland Cryptocurrency Ctrl-Left Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckery Cuckservatism Cuckservative CUFI Cuisine Cultural Marxism Cultural Revolution Culture Culture War Curfew Czars Czech Republic DACA Daily Data Dump Dallas Shooting Damnatio Memoriae Dan Bilzarian Danny Danon Daren Acemoglu Darwinism Darya Dugina Data Data Analysis Dave Chappelle David Bazelon David Brog David Friedman David Frum David Irving David Lynch David Petraeus Davide Piffer Davos Death Of The West Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Deborah Lipstadt Debt Debt Jubilee Decadence Deep State Deficits Degeneracy Democracy Democratic Party Demograhics Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denmark Dennis Ross Department Of Homeland Security Deplatforming Derek Chauvin Detroit Development Dick Cheney Diet Digital Yuan Dinesh D'Souza Discrimination Disease Disinformation Disney Disparate Impact Dissent Dissidence Diversity Diversity Before Diversity Diversity Pokemon Points Divorce DNA Dogs Dollar Domestic Surveillance Domestic Terrorism Doomsday Clock Dostoevsky Doug Emhoff Doug Feith Dresden Drone War Drones Drug Laws Drugs Duterte Dysgenic Dystopia E. Michael Jones E. O. Wilson East Asia East Asian Exception East Asians East Turkestan Eastern Europe Ebrahim Raisi Economic Development Economic History Economic Sanctions Economy Ecuador Edmund Burke Edmund Burke Foundation Education Edward Snowden Effective Altruism Effortpost Efraim Zurofff Egor Kholmogorov Egypt Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2020 Election Fraud Elections Electric Cars Eli Rosenbaum Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elise Stefanik Elites Elizabeth Holmes Elizabeth Warren Elliot Abrams Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emmanuel Macron Emmett Till Employment Energy England Entertainment Environment Environmentalism Epidemiology Equality Erdogan Eretz Israel Eric Zemmour Ernest Hemingway Espionage Espionage Act Estonia Ethics Ethics And Morals Ethiopia Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity Ethnocentricty EU Eugene Debs Eugenics Eurabia Eurasia Euro Europe European Genetics European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Genetics Evolutionary Psychology Existential Risks Eye Color Face Shape Facebook Faces Fake News False Flag Attack Family Family Systems Fantasy FARA Farmers Fascism Fast Food FBI FDA FDD Federal Reserve Feminism Ferguson Ferguson Shooting Fermi Paradox Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates FIFA Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Finland Finn Baiting Finns First Amendment FISA Fitness Flash Mobs Flight From White Floyd Riots 2020 Fluctuarius Argenteus Flynn Effect Food Football For Fun Forecasts Foreign Agents Registration Act Foreign Policy Fourth Amendment Fox News France Francesca Albanese Frank Salter Frankfurt School Franklin D. Roosevelt Franz Boas Fraud Freakonomics Fred Kagan Free Market Free Speech Free Trade Freedom Of Speech Freedom French Revolution Friedrich Karl Berger Friends Of The Israel Defense Forces Frivolty Frontlash Furkan Dogan Future Futurism G20 Gambling Game Game Of Thrones Gavin McInnes Gavin Newsom Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians GDP Gen Z Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Equality Gender Reassignment Gene-Culture Coevolution Genealogy General Intelligence General Motors Generation Z Generational Gap Genes Genetic Diversity Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Genghis Khan Genocide Genocide Convention Genomics Gentrification Geography Geopolitics George Floyd George Galloway George Patton George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush Georgia Germans Germany Ghislaine Maxwell Gilad Atzmon Gina Peddy Giorgia Meloni Gladwell Glenn Greenwald Global Warming Globalism Globalization Globo-Homo God Gold Golf Gonzalo Lira Google Government Government Debt Government Overreach Government Spending Government Surveillance Government Waste Goyim Grant Smith Graphs Great Bifurcation Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Powers Great Replacement #GreatWhiteDefendantPrivilege Greece Greeks Greg Cochran Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Greta Thunberg Grooming Group Intelligence Group Selection GSS Guardian Guest Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns Guy Swan GWAS Gypsies H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Haiti Hajnal Line Halloween HammerHate Hannibal Procedure Happening Happiness Harvard Harvard University Harvey Weinstein Hassan Nasrallah Hate Crimes Fraud Hoax Hate Hoaxes Hate Speech Hbd Hbd Chick Health Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Hegira Height Henry Harpending Henry Kissinger Hereditary Heredity Heritability Hezbollah High Speed Rail Hillary Clinton Hindu Caste System Hindus Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanics Historical Genetics History Of Science Hitler HIV/AIDS Hoax Holland Hollywood Holocaust Denial Holocaust Deniers Holy Roman Empire Homelessness Homicide Homicide Rate Homomania Homosexuality Hong Kong Houellebecq Housing Houthis Howard Kohr Huawei Hubbert's Peak Huddled Masses Huey Newton Hug Thug Human Achievement Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Evolutionary Genetics Human Evolutionary Genomics Human Genetics Human Genomics Human Rights Human Rights Watch Humor Hungary Hunt For The Great White Defendant Hunter Biden Hunter-Gatherers I.F. Stone I.Q. I.Q. Genomics #IBelieveInHavenMonahan ICC Icj Ideas Identity Ideology And Worldview IDF Idiocracy Igbo Igor Shafarevich Ilan Pappe Ilhan Omar Illegal Immigration Ilyushin IMF Impeachment Imperialism Imran Awan Inbreeding Income India Indian IQ Indians Individualism Indo-Europeans Indonesia Inequality Inflation Intelligence Intelligence Agencies Intelligent Design International International Affairs International Comparisons International Court Of Justice International Criminal Court International Relations Internet Interracial Marriage Interracism Intersectionality Intifada Intra-Racism Intraracism Invade Invite In Hock Invade The World Invite The World Iosef Stalin Iosif Stalin Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iranian Nuclear Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Irish Is Love Colorblind Isaac Herzog ISIS Islam Islamic Jihad Islamic State Islamism Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Bonds Israel Defense Force Israel Defense Forces Israel Separation Wall Israeli Occupation IT Italy Itamar Ben-Gvir It's Okay To Be White Ivanka Ivy League J Street Jacky Rosen Jair Bolsonaro Jake Sullivan Jake Tapper Jamal Khashoggi James Angleton James B. Watson James Clapper James Comey James Forrestal James Jeffrey James Mattis James Watson Janet Yellen Janice Yellen Japan Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Greenblatt JASTA JCPOA JD Vance Jeb Bush Jeffrey Epstein Jeffrey Goldberg Jeffrey Sachs Jen Psaki Jennifer Rubin Jens Stoltenberg Jeremy Corbyn Jerry Seinfeld Jerusalem Jerusalem Post Jesuits Jesus Jesus Christ Jewish Genetics Jewish History Jewish Intellectuals Jewish Power Jewish Power Party Jewish Supremacism JFK Assassination JFK Jr. Jihadis Jill Stein Jimmy Carter Jingoism JINSA Joe Lieberman Joe Rogan John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John F. Kennedy John Hagee John Hawks John Kirby John Kiriakou John McCain John McLaughlin John Mearsheimer Joker Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Greenblatt Jonathan Pollard Jordan Peterson Joseph Kennedy Joseph McCarthy Josh Gottheimer Josh Paul Journalism Judaism Judea Judge George Daniels Judicial System Julian Assange Jussie Smollett Justice Justin Trudeau Kaboom Kahanists Kaiser Wilhelm Kamala Harris Kamala On Her Knees Kanye West Karabakh War 2020 Karen Kwiatkowski Karine Jean-Pierre Kashmir Kata'ib Hezbollah Kay Bailey Hutchison Kazakhstan Keir Starmer Kenneth Marcus Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Williamson Khazars Khrushchev Kids Kim Jong Un Kinship Kkk KKKrazy Glue Of The Coalition Of The Fringes Knesset Kompromat Korea Korean War Kosovo Kris Kobach Kristi Noem Ku Klux Klan Kubrick Kurds Kushner Foundation Kyle Rittenhouse Kyrie Irving Language Laos Larry C. Johnson Late Obama Age Collapse Latin America Latinos Laura Loomer Law Lawfare LDNR Lead Poisoning Leahy Amendments Leahy Law Lebanon Lee Kuan Yew Leftism Lenin Leo Frank Leo Strauss Let's Talk About My Hair LGBT LGBTI Liberal Opposition Liberal Whites Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libya Light Skin Preference Lindsey Graham Linguistics Literacy Literature Lithuania Litvinenko Living Standards Liz Cheney Liz Truss Lloyd Austin Localism long-range-missile-defense Longevity Looting Lord Of The Rings Lorde Loudoun County Louis Farrakhan Love And Marriage Low-fat Lukashenko Lula Lyndon B Johnson Lyndon Johnson Madeleine Albright Mafia MAGA Magnitsky Act Malaysia Malaysian Airlines MH17 Manosphere Manufacturing Mao Zedong Map Marco Rubio Maria Butina Marijuana Marine Le Pen Marjorie Taylor Greene Mark Milley Mark Steyn Mark Warner Marriage Martin Luther King Martin Scorsese Marvel Marx Marxism Masculinity Mass Shootings Mate Choice Mathematics Mathilde Krim Matt Gaetz Max Boot Max Weber Maxine Waters Mayans McCain McCain/POW McDonald's Meat Media Media Bias Medicine Medieval Christianity Medieval Russia Mediterranean Diet Medvedev Megan McCain Meghan Markle Mein Obama MEK Mel Gibson Men With Gold Chains Meng Wanzhou Mental Health Mental Illness Mental Traits Meritocracy Merkel Merkel Youth Merkel's Boner Merrick Garland Mexico MH 17 MI-6 Michael Bloomberg Michael Collins PIper Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Michael Jackson Michael Lind Michael McFaul Michael Moore Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michelle Goldberg Michelle Ma Belle Michelle Obama Microaggressions Middle Ages Middle East Migration Mike Huckabee Mike Johnson Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mike Waltz Mikhael Gorbachev Miles Mathis Militarized Police Military Military Analysis Military Budget Military History Military Spending Military Technology Millennials Milner Group Minimum Wage Minneapolis Minorities Miriam Adelson Miscellaneous Misdreavus Mishima Missile Defense Mitch McConnell Mitt Romney Mixed-Race MK-Ultra Mohammed Bin Salman Monarchy Mondoweiss Money Mongolia Mongols Monkeypox Monogamy Moon Landing Hoax Moon Landings Moore's Law Morality Mormonism Mormons Mortality Mortgage Moscow Mossad Movies Muhammad Multiculturalism Music Muslim Ban Muslims Mussolini NAEP Naftali Bennett Nakba NAMs Nancy Pelos Nancy Pelosi Narendra Modi NASA Nation Of Hate Nation Of Islam National Assessment Of Educational Progress National Debt National Endowment For Democracy National Review National Security Strategy National Socialism National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans Natural Gas Nature Vs. Nurture Navalny Affair Navy Standards Nazis Nazism Neandertals Neanderthals Near Abroad Negrolatry Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolibs Neolithic Neoreaction Netherlands Never Again Education Act New Cold War New Dark Age New Horizon Foundation New Orleans New Silk Road New Tes New World Order New York New York City New York Times New Zealand New Zealand Shooting NFL Nicholas II Nicholas Wade Nick Eberstadt Nick Fuentes Nicolas Maduro Niger Nigeria Nike Nikki Haley NIMBY Nina Jankowicz No Fly Zone Noam Chomsky Nobel Prize Nord Stream Nord Stream Pipelines Nordics Norman Braman Norman Finkelstein Norman Lear North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway Novorossiya NSA Nuclear Power Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Nuremberg Nutrition NYPD Obama Obama Presidency Obamacare Obesity Obituary Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Wall Street October Surprise Oedipus Complex OFAC Oil Oil Industry Oklahoma City Bombing Olav Scholz Old Testament Oliver Stone Olympics Open Borders OpenThread Opinion Poll Opioids Orban Organized Crime Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Orwell Osama Bin Laden OTFI Our Soldiers Speak Out Of Africa Model Paganism Pakistan Pakistani Paleoanthropology Paleocons Palestine Palestinians Palin Panhandling Papacy Paper Review Parasite Burden Parenting Parenting Paris Attacks Partly Inbred Extended Family Pat Buchanan Pathogens Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Findley Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Durov Pavel Grudinin Paypal Peace Peak Oil Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Pentagon Personal Genomics Personality Pete Buttgieg Pete Buttigieg Pete Hegseth Peter Frost Peter Thiel Peter Turchin Petro Poroshenko Pew Phil Rushton Philadelphia Philippines Philosophy Phoenicians Phyllis Randall Physiognomy Piers Morgan Pigmentation Pigs Pioneers Piracy PISA Pizzagate POC Ascendancy Podcast Poland Police Police State Polio Political Correctness Makes You Stupid Political Dissolution Political Economy Politicians Politics Polling Pollution Polygamy Polygyny Pope Francis Population Population Genetics Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Porn Pornography Portland Portugal Portuguese Post-Apocalypse Poverty Power Pramila Jayapal PRC Prediction Prescription Drugs President Joe Biden Presidential Race '08 Presidential Race '12 Presidential Race '16 Presidential Race '20 Prince Andrew Prince Harry Priti Patel Privacy Privatization Progressives Propaganda Prostitution protest Protestantism Proud Boys Psychology Psychometrics Psychopathy Public Health Public Schools Puerto Rico Puritans Putin Putin Derangement Syndrome QAnon Qassem Soleimani Qatar Quantitative Genetics Quebec Quiet Skies Quincy Institute R2P Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race/IQ Race Riots Rachel Corrie Racial Purism Racial Reality Racialism Racism Rafah Raj Shah Rand Paul Randy Fine Rap Music Rape Rashida Tlaib Rationality Ray McGovern Raymond Chandler Razib Khan Real Estate RealWorld Recep Tayyip Erdogan Red Sea Refugee Crisis #refugeeswelcome Religion Religion And Philosophy Rentier Reparations Reprint Republican Party Republicans Review Revisionism Rex Tillerson RFK Assassination Ricci Richard Dawkins Richard Goldberg Richard Grenell Richard Haas Richard Haass Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Rightwing Cinema Riots R/k Theory RMAX Robert A. Heinlein Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Ford Robert Kagan Robert Kraft Robert Maxwell Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert O'Brien Robert Reich Robots Rock Music Roe Vs. Wade Roger Waters Rolling Stone Roman Empire Romania Romanticism Rome Ron DeSantis Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rotherham Rothschilds RT International Rudy Giuliani Rush Limbaugh Russiagate Russian Demography Russian Elections 2018 Russian History Russian Media Russian Military Russian Nationalism Russian Occupation Government Russian Orthodox Church Russian Reaction Russians Russophobes Russophobia Russotriumph Ruth Bader Ginsburg Rwanda Sabrina Rubin Erdely Sacha Baron Cohen Sacklers Sailer Strategy Sailer's First Law Of Female Journalism Saint Peter Tear Down This Gate! Saint-Petersburg Salman Rushie Salt Sam Bankman-Fried Sam Francis Samantha Power Samson Option San Bernadino Massacre Sandra Beleza Sandy Hook Sapir-Whorf SAT Satanic Age Satanism Saudi Arabia Scandal Science Denialism Science Fiction Scooter Libby Scotland Scott Ritter Scrabble Sean Hannity Seattle Secession Select Post Self Determination Self Indulgence Semites Serbia Sergei Lavrov Sergei Skripal Sergey Glazyev Seth Rich Sex Sex Differences Sex Ratio At Birth Sexual Harassment Sexual Selection Sexuality Seymour Hersh Shai Masot Shakespeare Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Shared Environment Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shimon Peres Shireen Abu Akleh Shmuley Boteach Shoah Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shulamit Aloni Shurat HaDin Sigal Mandelker Sigar Pearl Mandelker Sigmund Freud Silicon Valley Singapore Single Men Single Women Sinotriumph Six Day War Sixties SJWs Skin Color Slavery Slavery Reparations Slavoj Zizek Slavs Smart Fraction Social Justice Warriors Social Media Social Science Socialism Society Sociobiology Sociology Sodium Solzhenitsyn Somalia Sotomayor South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea Southeast Asia Soviet History Soviet Union Sovok Space Space Exploration Space Program Spain Spanish Spanish River High School SPLC Sport Sports Srebrenica St Petersburg International Economic Forum Stabby Somali Staffan Stage Stalinism Standardized Tests Star Trek Star Wars Starvation Comparisons State Department Statistics Statue Of Liberty Steny Hoyer Stephen Cohen Stephen Colbert Stephen Harper Stephen Jay Gould Stephen Townsend Stereotypes Steroids Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steven Pinker Strait Of Hormuz Strategic Ambiguity Stuart Levey Stuart Seldowitz Student Debt Stuff White People Like Sub-replacement Fertility Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subhas Chandra Bose Subprime Mortgage Crisis Suburb Suella Braverman Sugar Suicide Superintelligence Supreme Court Susan Glasser Svidomy Sweden Switzerland Symington Amendment Syrian Civil War Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Take Action Taliban Talmud Tatars Taxation Taxes Tea Party Technical Considerations Technology Ted Cruz Telegram Television Terrorism Terrorists Terry McAuliffe Tesla Testing Testosterone Tests Texas THAAD Thailand The 10/7 Project The AK The American Conservative The Bell Curve The Bible The Black Autumn The Cathedral The Confederacy The Constitution The Eight Banditos The Family The Free World The Great Awokening The Left The Middle East The New York Times The South The States The Zeroth Amendment To The Constitution Theranos Theresa May Third World Thomas Jefferson Thomas Moorer Thought Crimes Tiananmen Massacre Tiger Mom TikTok TIMSS Tom Cotton Tom Massie Tom Wolfe Tony Blair Tony Blinken Tony Kleinfeld Too Many White People Torture Trade Trans Fat Trans Fats Transgender Transgenderism Transhumanism Translation Translations Transportation Travel Trayvon Martin Trolling True Redneck Stereotypes Trump Trump Derangement Syndrome Trust Tsarist Russia Tucker Carlson Tulsa Tulsi Gabbard Turkey Turks TWA 800 Twins Twitter Ucla UFOs UK Ukrainian Crisis UN Security Council Unbearable Whiteness Unemployment Unions United Kingdom United Nations United Nations General Assembly United Nations Security Council United States Universal Basic Income UNRWA Urbanization Ursula Von Der Leyen Uruguay US Blacks US Capitol Storming 2021 US Civil War II US Constitution US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 US Regionalism USA USAID USS Liberty USSR Uyghurs Uzbekistan Vaccination Vaccines Valdimir Putin Valerie Plame Vdare Venezuela Vibrancy Victoria Nuland Victorian England Video Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Vikings Viktor Orban Viktor Yanukovych Violence Vioxx Virginia Virginia Israel Advisory Board Vitamin D Vivek Ramaswamy Vladimir Zelensky Volodymur Zelenskyy Volodymyr Zelensky Vote Fraud Voter Fraud Voting Rights Voting Rights Act Vulcan Society Wall Street Walmart Wang Ching Wei Wang Jingwei War War Crimes War Guilt War In Donbass War On Christmas War On Terror War Powers War Powers Act Warhammer Washington DC WASPs Watergate Wealth Wealth Inequality Wealthy Web Traffic Weight WEIRDO Welfare Wendy Sherman West Bank Western Decline Western European Marriage Pattern Western Hypocrisy Western Media Western Religion Western Revival Westerns White America White Americans White Death White Flight White Guilt White Helmets White Liberals White Man's Burden White Nakba White Nationalism White Nationalists White People White Privilege White Slavery White Supremacy White Teachers Whiterpeople Whites Who Whom Whoopi Goldberg Wikileaks Wikipedia William Browder William F. Buckley William Kristol William Latson William McGonagle William McRaven WINEP Winston Churchill WMD Woke Capital Women Woodrow Wilson Workers Working Class World Bank World Economic Forum World Health Organization World Population World Values Survey World War G World War H World War Hair World War I World War III World War R World War T World War Weed WTF WVS WWII Xi Jinping Xinjiang Yahya Sinwar Yair Lapid Yemen Yevgeny Prigozhin Yoav Gallant Yogi Berra's Restaurant Yoram Hazony YouTube Yugoslavia Yuval Noah Harari Zbigniew Brzezinski Zimbabwe Zionism Zionists Zvika Fogel
Nothing found
All Commenters •ï¿½My
Comments
•ï¿½Followed
Commenters
�⇅All / On "Sigal Mandelker"
    Many individuals who actually care about the United States Constitution and its guarantee of basic liberties for the American people have been seriously concerned over how recent Administrations, both Republican and Democratic, have taken steps to control and limit the rights of citizens to exercise free speech as well as freedom to travel and associate...
  • @Jardine Sassoon
    @werpor

    Were the horrific Opium Wars were fought for...

    ...the British East India Company? The west's drug cartel of the 18th century I think.

    Because the emperor of China tried to stop them from poisoning the people of his empire.

    https://search.sapti.me/search?q=flag+of+British+East+India+Company&category_images=&language=auto&time_range=&safesearch=2&theme=simple

    Replies: @werpor

    I must confess I’m unable to understand the relevance of your post in the instance.

  • @werpor
    @Poupon Marx

    All very interesting…but you have strayed from economics to *metaphysics. We cannot write entire books here but Jung’s analysis of Adolf Hitler is hardly relevant. On that basis what are to make of any handful of megalomaniacs?

    Mefobills main thesis can be distilled down to a critique of the Federal Reserve and a question — what is there in past that may help us understand the present; economically at any rate? I agree with his main thesis — that the U.S. Federal Reserve is today and has been since its inception a dangerous instrument.

    Why would any country tolerate being socially and economically defenestrated? And speaking of megalomaniacs, what is one to make of Benjamin Netanyahu? How is that Americans tolerate him being invited to deliver an address to a joint session of Congress on July 24.

    What relevance to present circumstances would Jung’s analysis of Benjamin Netanyahu have — were Jung still alive today to do it — on public perception. Americans today are no less susceptible to being seduced by public figures than Germans’ in the 1930s. President Obama could be seen in Chicago Nov 6, 2012 seducing the crowd.

    The U.S. has been projecting violence throughout the world for decades. …No different than Adolf Hitler and equally violent. Instead of a flag with a swastika — cribbed from various cultures around the world — which remains still as a symbol of good luck and prosperity among the Hindi, Buddhist, and Jain countries such as Nepal, India, Thailand, Sri Lanka, China and Japan, and among the Navajo of the Southwest United States — the United States flys a flag derived from one flown by the British East India Company.

    Jung’s writings include the power of symbolism to compel behaviour as well as the power of rhetorical exhibitionism to compel mass psychosis. As a rule both are projections — the velvet glove you might say — over the iron fist.

    Everything you write about Germany and Adolf Hitler can be written about Winston Churchill in Great Britain or FDR in the United States. There are many variations of ways to stir up and compel behaviours theistically consistent with a ruling elites intentions. Then there is music — fife and drum, marching bands, bagpipes, even rock and roll.

    *Metaphysics is barely understood anywhere — even in the lands from which metaphysics emerged.

    Religion is a degraded manifestation of insights never easily understood. Millions of humans have knowledge about the degraded forms of metaphysical insights. And of course this includes the power possessing elites — whether popes or kings. People without an inner anchor are malleable. The power possessors are no less unanchored — but more so. Though power possessors can never be persuaded that more power, more money, and a more elevated position is less.

    Metaphysics is a work of development. It is not belief! Indeed it is certainty — but not intellectual certainty. People cannot be persuaded that they have no understanding about the bodies they inhabit, other than the pursuit of pleasure which no doubt includes even ordinary work. Our bodies like working. The problem for the metaphysician is that almost everyone lives in their head and is run by their emotions. Few people have done the work necessary to balance the three energies — the energy of the body, the energy of thoughts and the energy of their emotions. Not to mention the problem of imagination — the disease of tomorrow and the lures of imagined other lives.

    Think here three horses. The head with its imaginary yearnings, the body with its insatiable busyness, the emotions fragile and unstable — and the reins to each of the horses tied around one’s neck. They are untamed. First one horse is given its head then another horse is given its head then the third horse wanders off in search of greener pastures. The three horses must be tamed and trained to work together. This requires a mastery over the mind, the body, and the emotions.

    Who has that?

    Metaphysics is not philosophy. Metaphysics is not about obtaining outer things. It is about mastering the wild horses within us. Who knows how to begin? Who understands the necessity of beginning?

    Who knows where to look?

    Replies: @littlereddot, @Poupon Marx, @Jardine Sassoon

    Were the horrific Opium Wars were fought for…

    …the British East India Company? The west’s drug cartel of the 18th century I think.

    Because the emperor of China tried to stop them from poisoning the people of his empire.

    https://search.sapti.me/search?q=flag+of+British+East+India+Company&category_images=&language=auto&time_range=&safesearch=2&theme=simple

    •ï¿½Replies: @werpor
    @Jardine Sassoon

    I must confess I’m unable to understand the relevance of your post in the instance.
  • @Mefobills
    @MoT


    Nabiullina? What I would like to know is how this person got away with putting 300 billion in jeopardy only to later be hailed as some sort of wonder woman. Some have been jailed or executed for less.
    �
    I want to know too. Putin doesn't really listen to her. Some sort of 3D chess perhaps. Keeping her in position, since she is an Atlantacist, might be a red-herring to confuse the west.

    He listens to Glazyev, and promoted his trusted economist Belousov to control the military spending. Both of these men are nationalists and sovereign money types.

    Basically, Russia secretly is operating similarly to NSDAP Germany, but still has some "privateering banks," as did Germany. The "ethnic" oligarchs in Russia tend to swarm around these banks - no surprise.

    Replies: @Poupon Marx, @MoT

    Interesting. So Nabs is in charge of a “honey pot”.

  • @Rich23
    @MoT

    Of course Lira was a clown.
    Lira and Ritter deserved each other.
    Yet, go over to Ritter’s Substack and read what Scott wrote about Lira in August 2023.
    Ritter wrote that Substack specifically about Lira while The Ukraine imprisoned him the second time and just a few months before he died. (You’re welcome to argue that fact with the howling wilderness)

    After reading Ritter’s Substack you’d be hard pressed to discern whether the Russians, The Ukrainians, Putin, Zelensky, the SBU, Lira or the oft-mentioned Patriot Scott Ritter were the bad guys.
    That style is not accidental.
    That style of communication is notoriously characteristic of one clandestine organization in the United States.
    It’s deliberate.
    Inverted communication….false premises and dishonest associations abound.

    The foundation is:
    1. Lira and Ritter were YouTube bros feeding each other
    2. Ritter and Lira shared antipathy toward bad-Ukraine and Zelensky.
    3. Both were/are American citizens
    4. Both advocated for Russia and its Special Operation

    However, Ritter’s bonafides look weak, unheroic traveling to and fro Russia promoting Putin’s position on the SMO while in contrast Gonzalo Lira appears badass, brave or suicidal blogging and YouTubeing against Zelensky’s Ukraine from heart of the beast.

    Of course, Ritter, ever the disorganized malignant narcissist (probably bipolar, manic, hyperthyroid), couldn’t stand the fact Lira in a war zone wore an olive drab tee-shirt for good reason and Ritter wore the same olive drab tee because he wanted to look fat.
    Affectation mattered to these two guys.
    They had to act the part primarily for the man in the mirror.
    Ouch!
    I digress.

    Ukraine arrests Lira and according to Ritter’s musings and the SBU “turns†Lira to propagandize in their favor.
    The rest is history or according Scott Ritter “We’re at War†which he repeats ad nauseam.
    Ritter makes no apologies for Lira’s demise nor tattooing the word “traitor†on his nominal “friendâ€.
    The “catch and release†process Ritter says was applied by Zelensky’s stooges to Lira can also be related to Scott Ritter’s personal history.
    You know, pot calls the kettle black.

    Replies: @MoT

    I remember Ritters comments clearly. Bizarre. But, there again, we are “told” that Lira was “imprisoned” a second time…. and… just like before…. He babbles away about his intentions. Who in their right mind does that? Nobody for Christs sake! That’s nuts.

  • @John Johnson
    @Commentator Mike

    Well you're wrong.

    They are getting around 600 long range ATACMS missiles. The actual number isn't known but that is significant compared to previous aid packages. Trump surprised everyone with his MIC pay-off bill. It pretty much gives them the ATACMS inventory. He didn't even have Johnson try to lowball the rest of Congress which would have worked He handed Johnson a bill that lets em rip. Thanks Trump. I mean that.

    I have posted video of an ATACMS defeating an S-400 even though a poster here didn't believe it was possible. Of course some are shot down but with 600 they can spare a few.

    Russia cannot simply replace those systems overnight. They take time to build and they are hampered by sanctions. After 1991 Russia became more dependent on Western technology. It isn't like the USSR days where they took pride in doing everything on their own.

    Putin is trying to call a truce before the aid arrives. If you look at actual videos of the front you will notice that the Russians have been sending out haphazard attacks with paid malcontents in vehicles that look like they are from Mad Max. That is not a well positioned military. I considered the possibility of it being a feint until Putin's offer. He would clearly prefer to leave the war with his captured conquests before the aid and F-16s arrive. That shows he is not planning a grand offensive as both Ritter and MacGregor have claimed.

    Ritter should be given his passport and told to climb in one of those chicken cage motorcycles. Go die for the glory of Putin.

    Replies: @Commentator Mike

    I have no doubt the Ukrainians have knocked out some anti-aircraft systems but the video you linked to looks unreal. You are selective in what you present and one cannot generalise from the few cases you show.

    Russians are knocking out some of these Western aid weapons in storage. Anyway it’s war and even the losing side can have some successes.

  • @Phibbs
    The only way to save America is to exterminate all Jews. Those who served them will also receive the death penalty -- starting with Genocide Joe and every member of Congress.

    Replies: @anon, @gidoutahere, @Nancy, @Marcos E, @1jonny, @joekoool102

    That list would definitely include Trump.

  • @Anonymous
    Ha. Next burn her predecessor Cohen, he was a Mossad NOC too, right, 21-current!

    https://web.archive.org/web/20160601233546/http://washingtonjewishweek.com/19787/as-david-cohen-becomes-cias-no-2-jews-appear-to-have-smoother-sailing-at-security-agencies/news/

    Who does a homely yenta hafta blow to get a big shot job like that?

    Replies: @Beyond the pale and fedup

    Ugly woman, no wonder that demography is so obsessed with turning pretty boys into faux girls.

  • @TGD
    @Fran Macadam

    It seems odd that Mr. Ritter would allow himself to be cowed by DHS operatives without raising a loud protest. He's not a country bumpkin. The intern at The American Conservative brings up a valid point.

    Replies: @Rich23

    Ritter is a country bumpkin.
    That’s not Ritter’s fatal flaw.

  • @Awakening Observer
    @Rich23

    Poor Rich. I'm always suspicious when posters put down those who are openly opposing the puppet regime in the Di$trict of Corruption. How do you plead?

    Replies: @Rich23

    Who is opposing the puppet regime?

  • @Commentator Mike
    @John Johnson

    I say this aid is hyped up and will change little just like all the other hyped aid and weapons sent previously. Probably it will have even less effect than aid and weapons sent previously.

    Replies: @John Johnson

    Well you’re wrong.

    They are getting around 600 long range ATACMS missiles. The actual number isn’t known but that is significant compared to previous aid packages. Trump surprised everyone with his MIC pay-off bill. It pretty much gives them the ATACMS inventory. He didn’t even have Johnson try to lowball the rest of Congress which would have worked He handed Johnson a bill that lets em rip. Thanks Trump. I mean that.

    I have posted video of an ATACMS defeating an S-400 even though a poster here didn’t believe it was possible. Of course some are shot down but with 600 they can spare a few.

    Russia cannot simply replace those systems overnight. They take time to build and they are hampered by sanctions. After 1991 Russia became more dependent on Western technology. It isn’t like the USSR days where they took pride in doing everything on their own.

    Putin is trying to call a truce before the aid arrives. If you look at actual videos of the front you will notice that the Russians have been sending out haphazard attacks with paid malcontents in vehicles that look like they are from Mad Max. That is not a well positioned military. I considered the possibility of it being a feint until Putin’s offer. He would clearly prefer to leave the war with his captured conquests before the aid and F-16s arrive. That shows he is not planning a grand offensive as both Ritter and MacGregor have claimed.

    Ritter should be given his passport and told to climb in one of those chicken cage motorcycles. Go die for the glory of Putin.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Commentator Mike
    @John Johnson

    I have no doubt the Ukrainians have knocked out some anti-aircraft systems but the video you linked to looks unreal. You are selective in what you present and one cannot generalise from the few cases you show.

    Russians are knocking out some of these Western aid weapons in storage. Anyway it's war and even the losing side can have some successes.
  • @John Johnson
    @geokat62

    I still have the better track record than Ritter and I don't have to go back to 2022.

    Ritter claimed this year that Putin is building a massive reserve force to crush to Ukraine.

    I said I'm not buying it and that Putin is in trouble. He is clearly trying to land grab with whatever he can out of desperation. Most likely trying to grab land before the additional aid arrives.

    Well look at what came out today:

    Putin offers truce if Ukraine exits Russian-claimed areas and drops NATO bid
    https://apnews.com/article/putin-russia-ukraine-war-4f58423548b3d2e8594c9d9eb8e9d36e

    Putin is offering to walk at the current lines.

    We will see what your great sex offender and oracle has to say about it. Probably something along the lines of "UKRAINE IS DOOMED" because that is what he has been saying since the war started. He isn't a military analyst. He has switched sides and serves Russia. He might as well move.

    Scott Ritter was also completely wrong about the IDF facing hell. He predicted a massive Red Dawn battle that never happened. Hamas is poorly equipped and the IDF simply blew up their tunnels. Iran gave them outddated equipment and they never had a plan.

    Replies: @Commentator Mike

    I say this aid is hyped up and will change little just like all the other hyped aid and weapons sent previously. Probably it will have even less effect than aid and weapons sent previously.

    •ï¿½Replies: @John Johnson
    @Commentator Mike

    Well you're wrong.

    They are getting around 600 long range ATACMS missiles. The actual number isn't known but that is significant compared to previous aid packages. Trump surprised everyone with his MIC pay-off bill. It pretty much gives them the ATACMS inventory. He didn't even have Johnson try to lowball the rest of Congress which would have worked He handed Johnson a bill that lets em rip. Thanks Trump. I mean that.

    I have posted video of an ATACMS defeating an S-400 even though a poster here didn't believe it was possible. Of course some are shot down but with 600 they can spare a few.

    Russia cannot simply replace those systems overnight. They take time to build and they are hampered by sanctions. After 1991 Russia became more dependent on Western technology. It isn't like the USSR days where they took pride in doing everything on their own.

    Putin is trying to call a truce before the aid arrives. If you look at actual videos of the front you will notice that the Russians have been sending out haphazard attacks with paid malcontents in vehicles that look like they are from Mad Max. That is not a well positioned military. I considered the possibility of it being a feint until Putin's offer. He would clearly prefer to leave the war with his captured conquests before the aid and F-16s arrive. That shows he is not planning a grand offensive as both Ritter and MacGregor have claimed.

    Ritter should be given his passport and told to climb in one of those chicken cage motorcycles. Go die for the glory of Putin.

    Replies: @Commentator Mike
  • Ludwig Watzal says: •ï¿½Website
    June 14, 2024 at 5:10 pm GMT •ï¿½100 Words

    The Biden regime is illegitimate. What happened to Scott Ritter, Phil Giraldi, Julian Assange, and many others demonstrates the behavior of a regime that looks more like Stalinism than a republic. Take the bogus charges against former President Trump or Steve Bannon and the people who took part in the demonstration on 6 January. The Biden regime is corrupt and criminal to the core, plus it’s illegitimate. It must be voted out of office. But like the Dems rigged the 2020 elections, they will do it again, but this time on a much broader scale. If the Biden regime “wins,” the US will be turned into a Fascist totalitarian dictatorship.

  • @geokat62
    @John Johnson


    He made very strange predictions…
    �
    Speaking of someone who makes very strange predictions, Your Excellency…

    John’s Johnson - Tell you what….
    Putin won’t make it to September 1st [2022]. I won’t post on Whiteny or Anglin for the rest of the year if I am wrong. If am I am right you have to refer to me as Your Excellency in any response.

    https://www.unz.com/mwhitney/scott-ritters-switcheroo-why-i-radically-changed-my-overall-assessment/?showcomments#comment-5347277
    �

    Replies: @John Johnson

    I still have the better track record than Ritter and I don’t have to go back to 2022.

    Ritter claimed this year that Putin is building a massive reserve force to crush to Ukraine.

    I said I’m not buying it and that Putin is in trouble. He is clearly trying to land grab with whatever he can out of desperation. Most likely trying to grab land before the additional aid arrives.

    Well look at what came out today:

    Putin offers truce if Ukraine exits Russian-claimed areas and drops NATO bid
    https://apnews.com/article/putin-russia-ukraine-war-4f58423548b3d2e8594c9d9eb8e9d36e

    Putin is offering to walk at the current lines.

    We will see what your great sex offender and oracle has to say about it. Probably something along the lines of “UKRAINE IS DOOMED” because that is what he has been saying since the war started. He isn’t a military analyst. He has switched sides and serves Russia. He might as well move.

    Scott Ritter was also completely wrong about the IDF facing hell. He predicted a massive Red Dawn battle that never happened. Hamas is poorly equipped and the IDF simply blew up their tunnels. Iran gave them outddated equipment and they never had a plan.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Commentator Mike
    @John Johnson

    I say this aid is hyped up and will change little just like all the other hyped aid and weapons sent previously. Probably it will have even less effect than aid and weapons sent previously.

    Replies: @John Johnson
  • Katrinka says:
    @1jonny
    @Phibbs


    The only way to save America is to exterminate all Jews. Those who served them will also receive the death penalty — starting with Genocide Joe and every member of Congress.
    �
    I'd like to be a patriot. Having to associate with would be murderers like you, at least as you are here in the comment you made, will make that impossible. I'm interested in saving my culture, not murdering all of the Jews, or singling out any other race for extermination. I understand from my desultory studying that attempting to kill off completely another culture comes somewhat naturally to humans, but it has to be firmly resisted if we expect to remain humans in the better sense.

    Replies: @anarchyst, @Katrinka

    Jews are the tip of the spear, the instigators if you will. They have a history, over two thousand years, of infiltrating, subverting, and destroying host countries. They are racketeers of the worst sort. Did you ever consider that your Jewish acquaintances are putting you on? It is a common trick. Jews hate gentiles. Wake the f*ck up. Jews need to be contained on an island somewhere. Let them produce wealth parasiting off each other. Truth is…we don’t need them.

    •ï¿½Agree: anarchyst
  • Odyssey says:
    June 14, 2024 at 4:17 am GMT •ï¿½100 Words
    @Suetonious
    @Odyssey


    The Berliner Telegraph announced that the year before last, the number of those who voluntarily took their own lives increased by 10%, in 2023 – by another 4.2%, and that about 1.07 million people ended up like that. So: yes every eightieth German.
    �
    1 out of every 80 Germans committed suicide last year.

    I am not surprised to learn more and more that sensible Germans are fleeing Germany and buying still cheap apartments in Latin America, Turkey and the UAE, where German communities are growing the fastest.
    �
    Meeting Germans who visit the States, they are polite, but I get the feeling that they see America as the edge of civilization and just want to be back in their own country.

    The outlook for the German nation is not looking good. We need one of those Joe Biden gas pump stickers, but it's America pointing and saying, "I did that!"

    Replies: @Odyssey

    You noticed well, the number seems excessive and probably the author clumsily transferred the relevant figures. I looked at another source and found (Holger Leerhoff, 64th ISI World Statistics Congress – Ottawa, Canada):

    Every year, around 10,000 people in Germany commit suicide. Comprehensive and reliable statistical data on this phenomenon are an important building block for effective suicide prevention. Based on the official cause-of-death statistics, this article uses data from the relevant 273,000 death cases from the years 1992 to 2016 to investigate four topics of varying complexity.

    I will look for where the error in translation occurred.

  • @Odyssey
    Panzers in crisis: The Germans are raising their hands more and more en masse because of - the meaninglessness of life

    (excerpts from the text of German/Russian Marina Gacemeier)

    At the beginning of May, my German friend, 31-year-old Ben, came home from work, texted his girlfriend that he was tired, that he was going to order a pizza and go to bed, but he didn't order it and didn't go to bed. He committed suicide.

    "I'm nothing," said my friend from Dresden, the Russian German Tolya, who returned to his historical homeland because he wanted to live in Germany, but he also committed suicide.
    The German media hardly writes about the wave of suicides that has swept the country.
    I did not find any expert analysis on this topic in German on the Internet. But there are statistics.

    The Berliner Telegraph announced that the year before last, the number of those who voluntarily took their own lives increased by 10%, in 2023 - by another 4.2%, and that about 1.07 million people ended up like that. So: yes every eightieth German.

    I think they kill themselves en masse because of the meaninglessness of life.
    Alcoholism is the norm in Germany.

    Looking at ordinary German men, I came to the conclusion that their almost universal daily alcoholism is an attempt to adapt to the unnatural lifestyle that has been promoted in their country for years, to come to terms with it.

    The moral condition of German citizens reminds me of what happened in Russia in the nineties. Alcoholism, drug addiction, permissiveness, decay, decadence...
    The Germans themselves call it decadence. They have in mind the feeling of hopelessness, desolation in the heads, discord in the soul.

    Drugs, alcohol, criminal gangs and blood on the asphalt are taking the lives of more and more Germans.

    Because of the hopelessness and meaninglessness of life, the lack of important things and people for whom they live.

    Today we know exactly who "pushed" us in Russia in the nineties and why.

    Did God save us from death then? Or did it help, maybe this is a rebellious thought, poverty?
    Back then we were focused on bare physical survival. We were focused on that in hungry, destroyed Russia. We had no time for decadence.

    The well-fed European's struggle for a bare life is unknown, so he indulges in consumption, buys unnecessary things, drowns in loans, brags about new mental illnesses, strips off his belt at fashion parades of tolerance and becomes depraved.

    The smarter and more honest a person is, the more uninteresting it is for him to live only for himself.

    Material wealth is too little for him. But in a consumer society there is only: travelled the world, drove the best car, bought expensive things for myself, ate only organic products..
    Like all well-to-do Germans, Ben had anything but a worthy reason for living.
    In atheistic Germany, belief in God is considered outdated and often even shameful.
    In liberal Germany, individualism triumphs: love yourself, do what you want, don't deny yourself anything.

    Saturation necessarily ends in desolation.
    We know who is pushing people into the abyss today, forcing anyone who dares to think and doubt the correctness of the misanthropic postmodernist agenda.

    Fundamental concepts - gender, family, religion - are increasingly being eroded, and centuries-old traditions are being destroyed.

    I am not surprised to learn more and more that sensible Germans are fleeing Germany and buying still cheap apartments in Latin America, Turkey and the UAE, where German communities are growing the fastest.

    "Germany is no longer my country", I heard these words in German several times in the resort of Egypt, where thousands and thousands of Germans are moving.

    And, it is precisely these people who today understand well the Russians who are fighting for their right to remain what they are.

    Replies: @Suetonious

    The Berliner Telegraph announced that the year before last, the number of those who voluntarily took their own lives increased by 10%, in 2023 – by another 4.2%, and that about 1.07 million people ended up like that. So: yes every eightieth German.

    1 out of every 80 Germans committed suicide last year.

    I am not surprised to learn more and more that sensible Germans are fleeing Germany and buying still cheap apartments in Latin America, Turkey and the UAE, where German communities are growing the fastest.

    Meeting Germans who visit the States, they are polite, but I get the feeling that they see America as the edge of civilization and just want to be back in their own country.

    The outlook for the German nation is not looking good. We need one of those Joe Biden gas pump stickers, but it’s America pointing and saying, “I did that!”

    •ï¿½Replies: @Odyssey
    @Suetonious

    You noticed well, the number seems excessive and probably the author clumsily transferred the relevant figures. I looked at another source and found (Holger Leerhoff, 64th ISI World Statistics Congress - Ottawa, Canada):

    Every year, around 10,000 people in Germany commit suicide. Comprehensive and reliable statistical data on this phenomenon are an important building block for effective suicide prevention. Based on the official cause-of-death statistics, this article uses data from the relevant 273,000 death cases from the years 1992 to 2016 to investigate four topics of varying complexity.
    �
    I will look for where the error in translation occurred.
  • @Anonymous
    @littlereddot


    3. The forest dweller – he who passes on his family and worldly duties to the next generation and seeks his higher truths, whatever they may be
    4. The renunciate – he who loses interest in the material world and spends it in spiritual pursuits.
    . . .
    Why do the Abrahamic cultures not incorporate the two latter stages?
    �
    Well, I'm in either 3 0r 4, probably 3 fading into 4, depending on you you look at it and whether I survive the US Dollar collapse. My family structure is destroyed (despite my best efforts) and, althugh all my kids tried to start a family, only one of my kids has succeeded, and she is out of communication. So 3 or 4 does happen.

    I think that the emphasis on stage 2 in its present form comes from the Dark Ages and the Middle Ages. In those days, Western Europe had a very large residual native population (previous subjects of the Roman Empire) ruled by a comparatively small population that descended from the survivors of the invading tribes.

    Typically, the tribal structure of the invading tribes had been destroyed by military necessity during the invasion and subsequent fighting with other invading tribes. Dark/Middle Ages government was basic military -- a vassal had land that he had to protect, a duty to provide troops for the King should another (Lord forbid!) tribal confederation challenge the current ruler, and a duty to be Catholic (if his confederation had been converted to Christianity, as most eventually were).

    As you know, the "vassal" system eventually produced a collection of small estates, each with its own strongpoint (fort, castle) for use when somebody, either neighbor or King's war, or, later, Viking raider, required that the vassal provide some secure place to put the peasants and their livestock until the fighting ended.

    The vassal system was anything but stable. Fighting was episodic but common. Knights were heavy cavalry descended in concept from the old Persian heavy cavalry ("Clibanarii" in Latin, "Oven boys" in English, as the heavy cavalry tended to overheat during fights). Heavy cavalry could defeat infantry through most of the Dark and Middle Ages, so the vassal had to field and lead (very expensive) heavy cavalry. During that interval, armor tended to be chain mail over padding, somewhat protective but hot, and not too heavy to fight in.

    Armor or no, however, the knights had heavy casualties. The feudal system demanded leadership of local forces by the actual ruler of the fief, with his of-age sons also fighting (and some serving as subordinate commanders of men at arms and the badly trained peasant infantry and support levies).

    FINALLY I GET TO THE POINT

    As a result, the nobility, especially local nobility, didn't live very long and always needed children (men to fight, women to build alliances). Surviving knights tended to be in their 20s during heavy fighting (the older ones slowing down or getting exhausted and then getting killed). A vassal who ran out of male descendants of fighting age lost the fight. Noble wives maximized their rate of pregnancy by giving nursing over to wet nurses and child care over to servants.

    So you can see where this is going: Western European nobility never got to (3) and (4) because there was always some threat that kept the present vassal in (2), remaining in active control and leadership, or dying. Remember, the "vassal" relationship was like father/son rather than "Emperor"/"Province governor". It was an "individual person to individual person" rather than a "role to role" relationship, and the King could only appoint a non-heir vassal/local leader if he wanted to risk a general revolt of the other vassals. Kings had less freedom of action than one might think.

    Perhaps (3) and (4) are coming back, now that the Western social structure is disintegrating. Retired bureaucrats/apparatchiks have no place other than (3) and (4) to go.

    Replies: @littlereddot

    Yes, your observations are true. They are also true in other cultures. I live in Southeast Asia, at a crossroads of cultures. From my vantage point it is easy for me to observe Westerners, Indians, Muslims, East Asians etc.

    I can say this focus on the material world is true of most other cultures. Even amongst the Hindus themselves, they are overwhelmingly focused on the material world. It is only the most committed ones who pursue this 4 stage life.

    My own opinion is that the focus on the material world is really a default condition of the current world we live in (in Hindu parlance Kali yuga, or Eon of Quarrel and Hypocrisy). All cultures are similarly transfixed by it. It is only a small segment of each culture that pursue what lies beyond materiality. Even the Abrahamic faiths too have their own more spiritually inclined sects. There are Christian mystics, the Muslims have their Sufis, the Jews have their Kabbalists.

    Some say the Kali Yuga ends in 2025. A cause for optimism, I say.

  • Odyssey says:
    June 14, 2024 at 2:24 am GMT •ï¿½600 Words

    Panzers in crisis: The Germans are raising their hands more and more en masse because of – the meaninglessness of life

    (excerpts from the text of German/Russian Marina Gacemeier)

    At the beginning of May, my German friend, 31-year-old Ben, came home from work, texted his girlfriend that he was tired, that he was going to order a pizza and go to bed, but he didn’t order it and didn’t go to bed. He committed suicide.

    “I’m nothing,” said my friend from Dresden, the Russian German Tolya, who returned to his historical homeland because he wanted to live in Germany, but he also committed suicide.
    The German media hardly writes about the wave of suicides that has swept the country.
    I did not find any expert analysis on this topic in German on the Internet. But there are statistics.

    The Berliner Telegraph announced that the year before last, the number of those who voluntarily took their own lives increased by 10%, in 2023 – by another 4.2%, and that about 1.07 million people ended up like that. So: yes every eightieth German.

    I think they kill themselves en masse because of the meaninglessness of life.
    Alcoholism is the norm in Germany.

    Looking at ordinary German men, I came to the conclusion that their almost universal daily alcoholism is an attempt to adapt to the unnatural lifestyle that has been promoted in their country for years, to come to terms with it.

    The moral condition of German citizens reminds me of what happened in Russia in the nineties. Alcoholism, drug addiction, permissiveness, decay, decadence…
    The Germans themselves call it decadence. They have in mind the feeling of hopelessness, desolation in the heads, discord in the soul.

    Drugs, alcohol, criminal gangs and blood on the asphalt are taking the lives of more and more Germans.

    Because of the hopelessness and meaninglessness of life, the lack of important things and people for whom they live.

    Today we know exactly who “pushed” us in Russia in the nineties and why.

    Did God save us from death then? Or did it help, maybe this is a rebellious thought, poverty?
    Back then we were focused on bare physical survival. We were focused on that in hungry, destroyed Russia. We had no time for decadence.

    The well-fed European’s struggle for a bare life is unknown, so he indulges in consumption, buys unnecessary things, drowns in loans, brags about new mental illnesses, strips off his belt at fashion parades of tolerance and becomes depraved.

    The smarter and more honest a person is, the more uninteresting it is for him to live only for himself.

    Material wealth is too little for him. But in a consumer society there is only: travelled the world, drove the best car, bought expensive things for myself, ate only organic products..
    Like all well-to-do Germans, Ben had anything but a worthy reason for living.
    In atheistic Germany, belief in God is considered outdated and often even shameful.
    In liberal Germany, individualism triumphs: love yourself, do what you want, don’t deny yourself anything.

    Saturation necessarily ends in desolation.
    We know who is pushing people into the abyss today, forcing anyone who dares to think and doubt the correctness of the misanthropic postmodernist agenda.

    Fundamental concepts – gender, family, religion – are increasingly being eroded, and centuries-old traditions are being destroyed.

    I am not surprised to learn more and more that sensible Germans are fleeing Germany and buying still cheap apartments in Latin America, Turkey and the UAE, where German communities are growing the fastest.

    “Germany is no longer my country”, I heard these words in German several times in the resort of Egypt, where thousands and thousands of Germans are moving.

    And, it is precisely these people who today understand well the Russians who are fighting for their right to remain what they are.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Suetonious
    @Odyssey


    The Berliner Telegraph announced that the year before last, the number of those who voluntarily took their own lives increased by 10%, in 2023 – by another 4.2%, and that about 1.07 million people ended up like that. So: yes every eightieth German.
    �
    1 out of every 80 Germans committed suicide last year.

    I am not surprised to learn more and more that sensible Germans are fleeing Germany and buying still cheap apartments in Latin America, Turkey and the UAE, where German communities are growing the fastest.
    �
    Meeting Germans who visit the States, they are polite, but I get the feeling that they see America as the edge of civilization and just want to be back in their own country.

    The outlook for the German nation is not looking good. We need one of those Joe Biden gas pump stickers, but it's America pointing and saying, "I did that!"

    Replies: @Odyssey
  • @Fran Macadam
    I was saddened to read an article by an intern at The American Conservative that tried to smear Scott Ritter and implied without any evidence that he faked this episode.

    Replies: @TGD

    It seems odd that Mr. Ritter would allow himself to be cowed by DHS operatives without raising a loud protest. He’s not a country bumpkin. The intern at The American Conservative brings up a valid point.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Rich23
    @TGD

    Ritter is a country bumpkin.
    That’s not Ritter’s fatal flaw.
  • Anonymous[208] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:
    June 13, 2024 at 3:25 pm GMT •ï¿½600 Words
    @littlereddot

    Satisfaction for humans comes from somehow forming a family and successfully raising children who do much the same.
    �
    Yes, this would be the situation in much of the world and certainly in the West. But there are traditions where this stage of raising a family is but a middle stage in ones life. I am thinking of course of the Hindus who think in terms of 4 stages in life

    1. The student/child
    2. The householder (that which we speak of above)
    3. The forest dweller - he who passes on his family and worldly duties to the next generation and seeks his higher truths, whatever they may be
    4. The renunciate - he who loses interest in the material world and spends it in spiritual pursuits.

    It seems pretty wise to me.

    Why do the Abrahamic cultures not incorporate the two latter stages? My hunch is that it is because they believe that they have already found the answer....so "what's the point of seeking further?". In this way, the Hindus have a lot to teach the rest of us.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    3. The forest dweller – he who passes on his family and worldly duties to the next generation and seeks his higher truths, whatever they may be
    4. The renunciate – he who loses interest in the material world and spends it in spiritual pursuits.
    . . .
    Why do the Abrahamic cultures not incorporate the two latter stages?

    Well, I’m in either 3 0r 4, probably 3 fading into 4, depending on you you look at it and whether I survive the US Dollar collapse. My family structure is destroyed (despite my best efforts) and, althugh all my kids tried to start a family, only one of my kids has succeeded, and she is out of communication. So 3 or 4 does happen.

    I think that the emphasis on stage 2 in its present form comes from the Dark Ages and the Middle Ages. In those days, Western Europe had a very large residual native population (previous subjects of the Roman Empire) ruled by a comparatively small population that descended from the survivors of the invading tribes.

    Typically, the tribal structure of the invading tribes had been destroyed by military necessity during the invasion and subsequent fighting with other invading tribes. Dark/Middle Ages government was basic military — a vassal had land that he had to protect, a duty to provide troops for the King should another (Lord forbid!) tribal confederation challenge the current ruler, and a duty to be Catholic (if his confederation had been converted to Christianity, as most eventually were).

    As you know, the “vassal” system eventually produced a collection of small estates, each with its own strongpoint (fort, castle) for use when somebody, either neighbor or King’s war, or, later, Viking raider, required that the vassal provide some secure place to put the peasants and their livestock until the fighting ended.

    The vassal system was anything but stable. Fighting was episodic but common. Knights were heavy cavalry descended in concept from the old Persian heavy cavalry (“Clibanarii” in Latin, “Oven boys” in English, as the heavy cavalry tended to overheat during fights). Heavy cavalry could defeat infantry through most of the Dark and Middle Ages, so the vassal had to field and lead (very expensive) heavy cavalry. During that interval, armor tended to be chain mail over padding, somewhat protective but hot, and not too heavy to fight in.

    Armor or no, however, the knights had heavy casualties. The feudal system demanded leadership of local forces by the actual ruler of the fief, with his of-age sons also fighting (and some serving as subordinate commanders of men at arms and the badly trained peasant infantry and support levies).

    FINALLY I GET TO THE POINT

    As a result, the nobility, especially local nobility, didn’t live very long and always needed children (men to fight, women to build alliances). Surviving knights tended to be in their 20s during heavy fighting (the older ones slowing down or getting exhausted and then getting killed). A vassal who ran out of male descendants of fighting age lost the fight. Noble wives maximized their rate of pregnancy by giving nursing over to wet nurses and child care over to servants.

    So you can see where this is going: Western European nobility never got to (3) and (4) because there was always some threat that kept the present vassal in (2), remaining in active control and leadership, or dying. Remember, the “vassal” relationship was like father/son rather than “Emperor”/”Province governor”. It was an “individual person to individual person” rather than a “role to role” relationship, and the King could only appoint a non-heir vassal/local leader if he wanted to risk a general revolt of the other vassals. Kings had less freedom of action than one might think.

    Perhaps (3) and (4) are coming back, now that the Western social structure is disintegrating. Retired bureaucrats/apparatchiks have no place other than (3) and (4) to go.

    •ï¿½Replies: @littlereddot
    @Anonymous

    Yes, your observations are true. They are also true in other cultures. I live in Southeast Asia, at a crossroads of cultures. From my vantage point it is easy for me to observe Westerners, Indians, Muslims, East Asians etc.

    I can say this focus on the material world is true of most other cultures. Even amongst the Hindus themselves, they are overwhelmingly focused on the material world. It is only the most committed ones who pursue this 4 stage life.

    My own opinion is that the focus on the material world is really a default condition of the current world we live in (in Hindu parlance Kali yuga, or Eon of Quarrel and Hypocrisy). All cultures are similarly transfixed by it. It is only a small segment of each culture that pursue what lies beyond materiality. Even the Abrahamic faiths too have their own more spiritually inclined sects. There are Christian mystics, the Muslims have their Sufis, the Jews have their Kabbalists.

    Some say the Kali Yuga ends in 2025. A cause for optimism, I say.
  • geokat62 says:
    @John Johnson
    Ritter has traveled to Russia and Iran, as well as to other hot spots, without regard for his personal safety, driven by the desire to tell the truth

    He isn't driven by the desire to tell the truth.

    He has been paid by Russian state media in the past and has made dozens of videos along the lines of "Ukraine is doomed" and without any regard for accountability.

    Scott Ritter is not a military analyst as he has zero interest in actually analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of each side.

    He is pro-Putin and not even close to impartial. He gave a pep rally speech to Chechen troops where he praised their patriotism and condemned America. That is not a journalist. He has clearly taken a side in this war. He has that right but he should be honest instead of trying to depict himself as a journalist. I have most respect for Anglin who called himself "Putin's #1 fanboy" when the war broke out.

    For his pains, he inevitably is accused of being a source of Russian and anti-Israeli disinformation and even acting as “Putin’s poodle,†but his information has proven to be overwhelmingly reliable.

    None of his predictions from the first year came true and his "inside sources" are most likely fictional. He made very strange predictions about the IDF in relation to Hamas that did not happen or even close. Most of those videos have been scrubbed. Scott Ritter sells wishful thinking to his followers and hopes they don't notice how often he is simply wrong.

    He has a criminal record which is entirely related to his bias towards Putin. He is blacklisted in US media because of his conviction and seeks alternative attention.

    Scott Ritter isn't a hero. I don't support withholding passports without explanation but there could be more to this story.

    Moscow actually made a statement in support of holding him. Strange but true:
    https://www.timesunion.com/news/article/state-dept-seizes-scott-ritter-s-passport-flight-19498991.php

    Replies: @geokat62

    He made very strange predictions…

    Speaking of someone who makes very strange predictions, Your Excellency…

    John’s Johnson – Tell you what….
    Putin won’t make it to September 1st [2022]. I won’t post on Whiteny or Anglin for the rest of the year if I am wrong. If am I am right you have to refer to me as Your Excellency in any response.

    https://www.unz.com/mwhitney/scott-ritters-switcheroo-why-i-radically-changed-my-overall-assessment/?showcomments#comment-5347277

    •ï¿½LOL: littlereddot
    •ï¿½Replies: @John Johnson
    @geokat62

    I still have the better track record than Ritter and I don't have to go back to 2022.

    Ritter claimed this year that Putin is building a massive reserve force to crush to Ukraine.

    I said I'm not buying it and that Putin is in trouble. He is clearly trying to land grab with whatever he can out of desperation. Most likely trying to grab land before the additional aid arrives.

    Well look at what came out today:

    Putin offers truce if Ukraine exits Russian-claimed areas and drops NATO bid
    https://apnews.com/article/putin-russia-ukraine-war-4f58423548b3d2e8594c9d9eb8e9d36e

    Putin is offering to walk at the current lines.

    We will see what your great sex offender and oracle has to say about it. Probably something along the lines of "UKRAINE IS DOOMED" because that is what he has been saying since the war started. He isn't a military analyst. He has switched sides and serves Russia. He might as well move.

    Scott Ritter was also completely wrong about the IDF facing hell. He predicted a massive Red Dawn battle that never happened. Hamas is poorly equipped and the IDF simply blew up their tunnels. Iran gave them outddated equipment and they never had a plan.

    Replies: @Commentator Mike
  • Satisfaction for humans comes from somehow forming a family and successfully raising children who do much the same.

    Yes, this would be the situation in much of the world and certainly in the West. But there are traditions where this stage of raising a family is but a middle stage in ones life. I am thinking of course of the Hindus who think in terms of 4 stages in life

    1. The student/child
    2. The householder (that which we speak of above)
    3. The forest dweller – he who passes on his family and worldly duties to the next generation and seeks his higher truths, whatever they may be
    4. The renunciate – he who loses interest in the material world and spends it in spiritual pursuits.

    It seems pretty wise to me.

    Why do the Abrahamic cultures not incorporate the two latter stages? My hunch is that it is because they believe that they have already found the answer….so “what’s the point of seeking further?”. In this way, the Hindus have a lot to teach the rest of us.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Anonymous
    @littlereddot


    3. The forest dweller – he who passes on his family and worldly duties to the next generation and seeks his higher truths, whatever they may be
    4. The renunciate – he who loses interest in the material world and spends it in spiritual pursuits.
    . . .
    Why do the Abrahamic cultures not incorporate the two latter stages?
    �
    Well, I'm in either 3 0r 4, probably 3 fading into 4, depending on you you look at it and whether I survive the US Dollar collapse. My family structure is destroyed (despite my best efforts) and, althugh all my kids tried to start a family, only one of my kids has succeeded, and she is out of communication. So 3 or 4 does happen.

    I think that the emphasis on stage 2 in its present form comes from the Dark Ages and the Middle Ages. In those days, Western Europe had a very large residual native population (previous subjects of the Roman Empire) ruled by a comparatively small population that descended from the survivors of the invading tribes.

    Typically, the tribal structure of the invading tribes had been destroyed by military necessity during the invasion and subsequent fighting with other invading tribes. Dark/Middle Ages government was basic military -- a vassal had land that he had to protect, a duty to provide troops for the King should another (Lord forbid!) tribal confederation challenge the current ruler, and a duty to be Catholic (if his confederation had been converted to Christianity, as most eventually were).

    As you know, the "vassal" system eventually produced a collection of small estates, each with its own strongpoint (fort, castle) for use when somebody, either neighbor or King's war, or, later, Viking raider, required that the vassal provide some secure place to put the peasants and their livestock until the fighting ended.

    The vassal system was anything but stable. Fighting was episodic but common. Knights were heavy cavalry descended in concept from the old Persian heavy cavalry ("Clibanarii" in Latin, "Oven boys" in English, as the heavy cavalry tended to overheat during fights). Heavy cavalry could defeat infantry through most of the Dark and Middle Ages, so the vassal had to field and lead (very expensive) heavy cavalry. During that interval, armor tended to be chain mail over padding, somewhat protective but hot, and not too heavy to fight in.

    Armor or no, however, the knights had heavy casualties. The feudal system demanded leadership of local forces by the actual ruler of the fief, with his of-age sons also fighting (and some serving as subordinate commanders of men at arms and the badly trained peasant infantry and support levies).

    FINALLY I GET TO THE POINT

    As a result, the nobility, especially local nobility, didn't live very long and always needed children (men to fight, women to build alliances). Surviving knights tended to be in their 20s during heavy fighting (the older ones slowing down or getting exhausted and then getting killed). A vassal who ran out of male descendants of fighting age lost the fight. Noble wives maximized their rate of pregnancy by giving nursing over to wet nurses and child care over to servants.

    So you can see where this is going: Western European nobility never got to (3) and (4) because there was always some threat that kept the present vassal in (2), remaining in active control and leadership, or dying. Remember, the "vassal" relationship was like father/son rather than "Emperor"/"Province governor". It was an "individual person to individual person" rather than a "role to role" relationship, and the King could only appoint a non-heir vassal/local leader if he wanted to risk a general revolt of the other vassals. Kings had less freedom of action than one might think.

    Perhaps (3) and (4) are coming back, now that the Western social structure is disintegrating. Retired bureaucrats/apparatchiks have no place other than (3) and (4) to go.

    Replies: @littlereddot
  • Anonymous[208] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:
    June 13, 2024 at 8:27 am GMT •ï¿½300 Words
    @werpor
    @littlereddot

    I wrote a response to someone on another thread. It is as good a response as any to embrace your comment in its entirety.

    Here it is:
    werpor said on Unz.com
    June 11, 2024,  500 words

    @anarchyst
    “If jewry is to change and become human, the “good†jews will have to “feel the heatâ€.

    Yes very true. I have Jewish family. Most have no knowledge of Zionist/Jewish history. But how many non-Jews know their histories? People only think they know all kinds of things. Most people now-a-days never question the received. They never question the source of the things they â€know.†Most people get the news from the TV talking heads. They are propagandized.

    Some Jewish people I know well are intelligent professionals. Yet they support Israel no matter what.
    They may have growing doubts about the present regime in Israel, however they have no doubts about their Jewish inheritance as a precious inheritance. They seem impervious to feeling the heat. For them being Jewish is more than important. This is their identity.

    Being identified — not matter with what religion, or what political party, or with one’s own opinions, or with a sports team is a kind of madness. Shedding one’s identifications is a pursuit only done intentionally and with resolve. Our identifications have us rather than that we have them.

    When I was a young man in the 1960s some men would claim that they were Ford guys or Chevy guys.

    Even after discovering management planned for their cars obsolescence and they experienced a breakdown some men took pride in being able to repair them themselves. Even when a politician lets them down over and over again many people claim themselves to be Democrats no matter what — or Republicans no matter what.

    Same for Jews. No matter how badly treated Jews treat Jews they just shrug. No matter how badly Jews treat a Goy its OK — because…

    Jews are the most identified with their affiliation as though they were born Jews rather than brainwashed. Same for some sports fans — the Toronto Maple Leafs have not won a Stanley Cup since 1967. Yet it is apparently impossible to buy a ticket. You’d think the fans would get tired of paying to watch losers. The same is true for some of the NFL teams — but once a Minnesota Viking always a Minnesota Viking.

    Why? Because without an identification they would cease to exist! Of course, one only truly exists without identifications. Spend any time with Jews you’ll discover that almost all they talk about is being Jewish. Their jokes are about being Jewish or not being Jewish. Their politics revolve around being Jewish. They look forward intently to celebrating as Jews. Jewish holidays. Friday Shabbat. And another dozen or so Jewish holidays.

    If you are Jewish it is almost impossible to free yourself from the Jewish spell. To be identified with something is to be under a spell. It is like being seduced.

    The principal aim of seduction is to bring under control. The etymology of the word seductor from Latin is sēdūcŠis “lead astray†— how about that. To be identified is to have been lead astray.
    Jews are tempered by “heat†— they love their suffering.

    Oddly one of the first things one is taught when one seeks enlightenment under a master is the importance of giving up one’s suffering.

    In the way of an addendum:

    Quoting you.

    “I am already satisfied that in this physical lifetime, it is not even necessary or useful for me to ask this question. But I did so out of curiosity.â€

    Is this really true?

    In Japanese Buddhism *satori* is a first step. Think here something much like satisfaction but not quite.

    Ch’an expressions refers to enlightenment — most certainly not identification — as “seeing *your* self- natureâ€. But even this is not enough. After seeing your self-nature, you need to deepen your experience even further and bring it into maturation. You should have enlightenment experiences again and again and support them with continuous practice. Even though Ch’an says that at the time of enlightenment, your outlook is the same as Buddha you are not full Buddha.

    One may be satisfied, however “seeing into one’s true nature†or “essence†is a practice of long self observation. Which requires the development of both seeing outward and at the same time seeing within. This is a self observer not a critique of self. Just simply seeing one’s self as one is.

    Hint:
    When one truly sees — usually in a situation where one is identified — it is like a curtain raising *momentarily* — accompanied by a hit to one’s emotions — felt in the solar plexus. The ego is on guard though. The “ego†does not want to be seen. The “ego†is not you, though it is commonly taken as “Iâ€â€¦

    Satisfaction may very well be acquiescence. Outside, everything rosy — inside restless. Buddhist’s commonly meditate cultivating an inner silence — better of course, to see one’s self as one truly is — in moments when someone is stepping on your corns. Where then is this “satisfaction?â€

    Replies: @littlereddot, @Anonymous

    This post is a Western comment on Buddhism. I’ll admit that it’s sort of like using a nihonga painting to clean a dirty floor, but it’s not inaccurate.

    Buddhist’s commonly meditate cultivating an inner silence — better of course, to see one’s self as one truly is — in moments when someone is stepping on your corns. Where then is this “satisfaction?â€

    That’s when “satisfaction” gets dropped and your self knowledge/knowledge of others gets tested – navigating that situation is the secular reward.

    This is the age in the West of false friends and mass deception about human nature (e.g. the Feminist “abortion as a women’s sacrament “). Seeing one’s self as one is, and other people as they really are, is both difficult and basic survival necessity in a very badly fragmented West. To paraphrase “Life is just a bowl of cherries” so that it represents reality: “Life is target acquisition”.

    Mousashi wrote in translation “Do not step heavily (to keep your balance). Do not hold your katana by the end of the hilt (to achieve a longer reach). Just step in and cut him down.” That captures something. In Western society, Musashi’s advice is best interpreted as “Act without thinking to neutralize the immediate threat and the legal/administrative aftermath of the neutralization”, and perhaps that was the interpretation used in old Japan by non-samurai.

    Satisfaction for humans comes from somehow forming a family and successfully raising children who do much the same. Western demography suggests that this satisfaction is now rare, “the impossible dream”, so impossible that neither men nor women cannot admit to having it, not even to themselves.

    Here’s some validation of the above “impossible dream” thesis from the US population:
    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/06/11/poll-only-19-of-joe-biden-voters-say-society-benefits-from-marriage-having-children/

    Of course, demographics for all the industrial nations are now very similar.

  • Ritter has traveled to Russia and Iran, as well as to other hot spots, without regard for his personal safety, driven by the desire to tell the truth

    He isn’t driven by the desire to tell the truth.

    He has been paid by Russian state media in the past and has made dozens of videos along the lines of “Ukraine is doomed” and without any regard for accountability.

    Scott Ritter is not a military analyst as he has zero interest in actually analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of each side.

    He is pro-Putin and not even close to impartial. He gave a pep rally speech to Chechen troops where he praised their patriotism and condemned America. That is not a journalist. He has clearly taken a side in this war. He has that right but he should be honest instead of trying to depict himself as a journalist. I have most respect for Anglin who called himself “Putin’s #1 fanboy” when the war broke out.

    For his pains, he inevitably is accused of being a source of Russian and anti-Israeli disinformation and even acting as “Putin’s poodle,†but his information has proven to be overwhelmingly reliable.

    None of his predictions from the first year came true and his “inside sources” are most likely fictional. He made very strange predictions about the IDF in relation to Hamas that did not happen or even close. Most of those videos have been scrubbed. Scott Ritter sells wishful thinking to his followers and hopes they don’t notice how often he is simply wrong.

    He has a criminal record which is entirely related to his bias towards Putin. He is blacklisted in US media because of his conviction and seeks alternative attention.

    Scott Ritter isn’t a hero. I don’t support withholding passports without explanation but there could be more to this story.

    Moscow actually made a statement in support of holding him. Strange but true:
    https://www.timesunion.com/news/article/state-dept-seizes-scott-ritter-s-passport-flight-19498991.php

    •ï¿½Replies: @geokat62
    @John Johnson


    He made very strange predictions…
    �
    Speaking of someone who makes very strange predictions, Your Excellency…

    John’s Johnson - Tell you what….
    Putin won’t make it to September 1st [2022]. I won’t post on Whiteny or Anglin for the rest of the year if I am wrong. If am I am right you have to refer to me as Your Excellency in any response.

    https://www.unz.com/mwhitney/scott-ritters-switcheroo-why-i-radically-changed-my-overall-assessment/?showcomments#comment-5347277
    �

    Replies: @John Johnson
  • @littlereddot
    @werpor

    Thank you. I like that story. It is a powerful teaching.

    Replies: @werpor

    You are most welcome.
    w

  • @Anonymous
    @dogbumbreath

    Guy --

    You aren't going to keep the Chinese economy afloat (or sink it either) by posting.

    Replies: @littlereddot

    Maybe not. But he is performing a valuable deed by informing all those who may be reading.

    I myself was in Hangzhou a few weeks back. It is a lovely city.

    Westerners will be shocked if they had the balls to visit China. Their picture of the world described to them by their media would begin to come crashing down.

  • @werpor
    @littlereddot

    Nature proceeds automatically — spring follows winter, summer follows spring, fall follows summer, winter follows fall — everything on Earth powered by the sun and moon. Some birds spend their entire lifetimes flying back and forth between the northern hemisphere and the southern hemisphere. Dogs chase cats. Boys chase girls. Life goes on. Everything is bound to happen — in general. For worms and fish and monkeys and man it is the same thing — in general. Everything is mechanical, happening inevitably and confirming inevitably to the diktats of its type — including man!

    Everything feeds on everything else — including feeding on us!

    Many people are familiar with Buddhism. There are rumours something higher for oneself may be obtained by pursuing the Buddhists way — a path to enlightenment. For most Buddhists their lives are changed positively by diligent meditation. But in most cases this is in conformity with natures laws — it is pursued mechanically. Many Buddhist can recite chapter and verse many aphorisms. No different than adherents of any religion — knowing the words in their books but failing to understand them. Everything obtained mechanically is inevitably lost the same way.

    There are truths in almost every book. But facts, trotted out when they seem appropriate are trotted out mechanically. Like political ideologies with which the adherents are identified — their books, their religions, their ideologies. Everything is mechanical. Real choosing is of course against the grain. When the sun lights up the eastern edge of the continent every morning millions of people are prompted to repeat the things they do every day — pursue life routines, entwined like cogs in a watch, or rather entwined in a giant mechanical whirligig.

    Routines include preparations to do evil — manufacturing drugs, manufacturing armaments, promulgating lies and ideologies, murdering, killing — done in thousands of factories and offices and back alleys by people completely oblivious of succumbing to the inertia of their mechanical lives lived like automatons. They fuck, have showers, drink coffee, brush their teeth, get dressed, check their email — all the while feeding the universe and getting nothing in return except tomorrow, while living lives of quiet desperation.

    If one already knows what one does is bad and does it anyway, one commits a ‘sin’ difficult to redress.
    In the evening they switch on their TVs, watching for further instructions. They watch mechanically and passively, rather than intentionally.

    Mechanicalness is the power of the universe. People imagine they are free. Yet they fill every moment with routines chosen by others. Their breathing is shallow. Their bodies deprived of oxygen. Even when they exercise they run on a treadmill. In rooms where the oxygen is depleted by recycling it in such confined quarters.

    What is much much worse they have no inner life. Ancient books and teachings spoke of this inner life. In translation aspects of these teachings were debased by thinking they referred to outer life. Of course people debased in body, mind , and emotions — manufactured by religiosity and conventional ideas had nothing themselves established within — to do other than reduce them to their own level of understanding.


    Many people have read or heard the Mulla Nasruddin story about his lost key.

    A man sees an anxious Mulla Nasruddin searching under a street light for something on the ground.

    When asked by the passer-by, “Mulla what have you lost?â€

    “I am searching for a key,†says Nasruddin.

    The passer-by and Nasruddin continue, both on their knees searching for the key.

    After a while the passer-by casually asks if Nasruddin could have lost the key elsewhere.

    Nasruddin answers “…yes, probably in my house over there.†Of course the passer-by jumps up and shouts at Nasruddin, “Then why are you searching for the key out here?â€

    Mulla Nasruddin casually answers as though it must be obvious, “ Because there is more light outside here than inside my house.â€

    Nasruddin’s message is looking outside, for that which is inside, is easy. It is easy to look outside in the light and see all the things that look like the solution to finding the key — religious beliefs, opinions of others, material things, intangible things like travel and more conventional education, attachment to various gurus, etc., all of which there is no shortage.

    Replies: @littlereddot

    Thank you. I like that story. It is a powerful teaching.

    •ï¿½Replies: @werpor
    @littlereddot

    You are most welcome.
    w
  • Anonymous[118] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:
    @dogbumbreath
    @Anonymous


    The PRC also has maybe a decade. Xi’s takeover appears to be an attempt to avoid the failure of the system that Deng Xiaoping set up in the late 1970s.
    �
    In the last 40 years, per the World Bank, China has lifted 770 million people out of absolute poverty (850 million overall), which represents 76% of World poverty over the same period. To put this achievement in context, that's over 2.5X the entire population of the USA:

    https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2022/04/01/lifting-800-million-people-out-of-poverty-new-report-looks-at-lessons-from-china-s-experience

    China today, does this look like collapse:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbywNxdtoe0&t=12217s

    Predicting China's economic doom is a cottage industry.
    The predictions have proven 100% wrong since 1949. Some examples:

    1990. China's economy has come to a halt. The Economist
    1996. China's economy will face a hard landing. The Economist
    1998. China's economy’s dangerous period of sluggish growth. The Economist
    1999. Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. Bank of Canada
    2000. China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. Chicago Tribune
    2001. A hard landing in China. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas
    2002. China Seeks a Soft Economic Landing. Westchester University
    2003. Banking crisis imperils China. New York Times
    2004. The great fall of China? The Economist
    2005. The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. Nouriel Roubini
    2006. Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? International Economy
    2007. Can China avoid a hard landing? TIME
    2008. Hard Landing In China? Forbes
    2009. China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. Fortune
    2010: Hard landing coming in China. Nouriel Roubini
    2011: Chinese Hard Landing Closer Than You Think. Business Insider
    2012: Economic News from China: Hard Landing. American Interest
    2013: A Hard Landing In China. Zero Hedge
    2014. A hard landing in China. CNBC
    2015. Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. Forbes
    2016. Hard landing looms for China. The Economist
    2017. Is China's Economy Going To Crash? National Interest
    2018. China's Coming Financial Meltdown. The Daily Reckoning.
    2019 China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? BBC2020. Coronavirus Could End China's Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak. NY Times
    2021 Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize. Bloomberg
    2022. China Surprise Data Could Spell R-e-c-e-s-s-i-o-n. Bloomberg.
    2023. No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. Bloomberg

    Replies: @Anonymous

    Guy —

    You aren’t going to keep the Chinese economy afloat (or sink it either) by posting.

    •ï¿½Replies: @littlereddot
    @Anonymous

    Maybe not. But he is performing a valuable deed by informing all those who may be reading.

    I myself was in Hangzhou a few weeks back. It is a lovely city.

    Westerners will be shocked if they had the balls to visit China. Their picture of the world described to them by their media would begin to come crashing down.
  • These two guys have a lot to say.


    Video Link

  • The Volker shibboleth.

    High interest rates is a massive transfer of wealth to parasites. It is junk economics. It is what the parasites want.

    What is going on? Interest rates.
    Turkey 50%
    Iran 23%
    Pakistan 20.5%
    Russia. 16%

  • @Anonymous
    @Poupon Marx

    Agree.

    There is a very real chance that humanity will revert to pre-industrial society in this next social change avalanche. Russia was "gifted" with a sort of protected 3 decade (1990-2020) of time to adapt. During this time interval Russia was looted, but its government (described at the time as a standard Third World kleptocracy) apparently devolved to the KGB, which surprisingly took its responsibilities seriously and took late Soviet society seriously [1], and over a series of threats/crises changed into the current Soviet society.

    At the same time, the US seems to be approaching something like Gorbachev's attempt at reorganization. If Trump isn't elected (does not serve as a Gorbachev analog), the US is still looking at a failure of the Globalization net that produces the global surplus that enables the Fed to inflate the US Dollar at will. Trump might fail, but there are others waiting in the wings, and the US Federal government has maybe a decade at most. After that, the US will find itself critically short of engineers and skilled workers who can build a new industrial plant.

    The PRC also has maybe a decade. Xi's takeover appears to be an attempt to avoid the failure of the system that Deng Xiaoping set up in the late 1970s. As such systems do, thanks to the Kondratieff Wave, Deng Xiaoping's system overshot, and now China is facing demographic and financial failures that may arguably be best coped with by a command government. In particular, PRC has more physical capital than it has resources to process them, the export market is precarious and, most importantly, more than can be supported by its young workers, its labor force of the future.

    This leaves Russia as the last stand of industrial society, the last country that has the land, labor, and capital mix needed to support an industrial society. Again, the Russian Federation may well take at least part of Europe as Federation members and as components of a Russian Federation industrial society.

    Again, please remember that this is a guess at a possibility, a "scenario", and might not happen. I describe it to outline a fairly likely possibility.

    ******************************************************
    1] See:
    Alexei Yurchak; Everything Was Forever, Until It Was No More: The Last Soviet Generation; 2005-10-23; by Alexei Yurchak (Author). Surprisingly enough, there was a real society underneath the Soviet government, a society that had survived Stalin and had some intrinsic ideals that (I think) are the foundation of the current Russian government.

    It appears that the attempt to salvage from the wreckage of Stalin's rule and WW II started under Khrushchev, who found that Russian society had become immune to even Stalinist levels of coercion and had devolved into a series of something like industrial fiefdoms, immensely inefficient and yet administratively unassailable (see: Red Plenty for a literary description of this time). His successors found much the same as had Khrushchev, the Russian industrial plant deteriorated, and the Russian government was, at the end, literally unable to pay for the electricity it needed to power some of its cities.

    The subsequent series of challenges to Russia and its government apparently produced a Russian response in a new form of Russian government that (at least for now) has effective control over its society, control has that not frozen Russian industry into an unproductive lump. This new Russian government is serving as a nucleus for at least a trade network.

    Replies: @dogbumbreath

    The PRC also has maybe a decade. Xi’s takeover appears to be an attempt to avoid the failure of the system that Deng Xiaoping set up in the late 1970s.

    In the last 40 years, per the World Bank, China has lifted 770 million people out of absolute poverty (850 million overall), which represents 76% of World poverty over the same period. To put this achievement in context, that’s over 2.5X the entire population of the USA:

    https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2022/04/01/lifting-800-million-people-out-of-poverty-new-report-looks-at-lessons-from-china-s-experience

    China today, does this look like collapse:

    Video Link
    Predicting China’s economic doom is a cottage industry.
    The predictions have proven 100% wrong since 1949. Some examples:

    1990. China’s economy has come to a halt. The Economist
    1996. China’s economy will face a hard landing. The Economist
    1998. China’s economy’s dangerous period of sluggish growth. The Economist
    1999. Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. Bank of Canada
    2000. China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. Chicago Tribune
    2001. A hard landing in China. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas
    2002. China Seeks a Soft Economic Landing. Westchester University
    2003. Banking crisis imperils China. New York Times
    2004. The great fall of China? The Economist
    2005. The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. Nouriel Roubini
    2006. Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? International Economy
    2007. Can China avoid a hard landing? TIME
    2008. Hard Landing In China? Forbes
    2009. China’s hard landing. China must find a way to recover. Fortune
    2010: Hard landing coming in China. Nouriel Roubini
    2011: Chinese Hard Landing Closer Than You Think. Business Insider
    2012: Economic News from China: Hard Landing. American Interest
    2013: A Hard Landing In China. Zero Hedge
    2014. A hard landing in China. CNBC
    2015. Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. Forbes
    2016. Hard landing looms for China. The Economist
    2017. Is China’s Economy Going To Crash? National Interest
    2018. China’s Coming Financial Meltdown. The Daily Reckoning.
    2019 China’s Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? BBC2020. Coronavirus Could End China’s Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak. NY Times
    2021 Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize. Bloomberg
    2022. China Surprise Data Could Spell R-e-c-e-s-s-i-o-n. Bloomberg.
    2023. No word should be off-limits to describe China’s faltering economy. Bloomberg

    •ï¿½Replies: @Anonymous
    @dogbumbreath

    Guy --

    You aren't going to keep the Chinese economy afloat (or sink it either) by posting.

    Replies: @littlereddot
  • werpor says:
    June 12, 2024 at 5:41 pm GMT •ï¿½700 Words
    @littlereddot
    @werpor

    When I use the word "satisfaction", I use it to describe my state of being at present time. Which is not urgently striving. To me, if it comes, well and good. If it does not, so be it. I do not seek my "true nature". I seek to learn whatever lesson appears before me.

    When I use "satisfaction" it does not represent a satisfaction that I am "already there". For I know that the revelation of wonders will continue for (effectively) eternity, and so will our own development.

    If I were satisfied that I have already arrived, then that state of being would more accurately say "self-satisfied". Then that oft repeated quote comes to mind: "If you meet the Buddha upon the road, kill him"...isn't the whole point of the quote never to be self-satisfied?

    From what you have written, so many questions arise. None of which I can probably answer satisfactorily in this lifetime, not that I really care if they are answered:

    When a man steps on my corn, and I remain placid, does that mean that I have arrived?

    Do we seek a placid nature because we associate it with the Buddha, and want to emulate him?

    Was the Buddha merely pointing us the way, or did he want us to become a facsimile of him?

    Did the Buddha "arrive"?......Does the Buddha, in whatever state he is currently, continue to progress and evolve?

    If so, is the direction that the Buddha took in his evolution, the only route for us? Is it necessary for us to emulate the Buddha? Or are other routes available?

    Please do not feel need to answer these questions. In truth I do not really care if I have the answer to them or not. Nor do I regard these "answers" as ultimate.

    Replies: @werpor

    Nature proceeds automatically — spring follows winter, summer follows spring, fall follows summer, winter follows fall — everything on Earth powered by the sun and moon. Some birds spend their entire lifetimes flying back and forth between the northern hemisphere and the southern hemisphere. Dogs chase cats. Boys chase girls. Life goes on. Everything is bound to happen — in general. For worms and fish and monkeys and man it is the same thing — in general. Everything is mechanical, happening inevitably and confirming inevitably to the diktats of its type — including man!

    Everything feeds on everything else — including feeding on us!

    Many people are familiar with Buddhism. There are rumours something higher for oneself may be obtained by pursuing the Buddhists way — a path to enlightenment. For most Buddhists their lives are changed positively by diligent meditation. But in most cases this is in conformity with natures laws — it is pursued mechanically. Many Buddhist can recite chapter and verse many aphorisms. No different than adherents of any religion — knowing the words in their books but failing to understand them. Everything obtained mechanically is inevitably lost the same way.

    There are truths in almost every book. But facts, trotted out when they seem appropriate are trotted out mechanically. Like political ideologies with which the adherents are identified — their books, their religions, their ideologies. Everything is mechanical. Real choosing is of course against the grain. When the sun lights up the eastern edge of the continent every morning millions of people are prompted to repeat the things they do every day — pursue life routines, entwined like cogs in a watch, or rather entwined in a giant mechanical whirligig.

    Routines include preparations to do evil — manufacturing drugs, manufacturing armaments, promulgating lies and ideologies, murdering, killing — done in thousands of factories and offices and back alleys by people completely oblivious of succumbing to the inertia of their mechanical lives lived like automatons. They fuck, have showers, drink coffee, brush their teeth, get dressed, check their email — all the while feeding the universe and getting nothing in return except tomorrow, while living lives of quiet desperation.

    If one already knows what one does is bad and does it anyway, one commits a ‘sin’ difficult to redress.
    In the evening they switch on their TVs, watching for further instructions. They watch mechanically and passively, rather than intentionally.

    Mechanicalness is the power of the universe. People imagine they are free. Yet they fill every moment with routines chosen by others. Their breathing is shallow. Their bodies deprived of oxygen. Even when they exercise they run on a treadmill. In rooms where the oxygen is depleted by recycling it in such confined quarters.

    What is much much worse they have no inner life. Ancient books and teachings spoke of this inner life. In translation aspects of these teachings were debased by thinking they referred to outer life. Of course people debased in body, mind , and emotions — manufactured by religiosity and conventional ideas had nothing themselves established within — to do other than reduce them to their own level of understanding.

    Many people have read or heard the Mulla Nasruddin story about his lost key.

    A man sees an anxious Mulla Nasruddin searching under a street light for something on the ground.

    When asked by the passer-by, “Mulla what have you lost?â€

    “I am searching for a key,†says Nasruddin.

    The passer-by and Nasruddin continue, both on their knees searching for the key.

    After a while the passer-by casually asks if Nasruddin could have lost the key elsewhere.

    Nasruddin answers “…yes, probably in my house over there.†Of course the passer-by jumps up and shouts at Nasruddin, “Then why are you searching for the key out here?â€

    Mulla Nasruddin casually answers as though it must be obvious, “ Because there is more light outside here than inside my house.â€

    Nasruddin’s message is looking outside, for that which is inside, is easy. It is easy to look outside in the light and see all the things that look like the solution to finding the key — religious beliefs, opinions of others, material things, intangible things like travel and more conventional education, attachment to various gurus, etc., all of which there is no shortage.

    •ï¿½Replies: @littlereddot
    @werpor

    Thank you. I like that story. It is a powerful teaching.

    Replies: @werpor
  • Gary Moore (r.i.p.) was banned in the US for creating the song Hiroshima while with
    Thin Lizzy.

  • Anonymous[283] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:
    @Poupon Marx
    @Anonymous

    If any country can solve this human replacement problem, it is Russia. Most of the women in high places in Russia are normally feminine and have children. Russian culture adores children and is very protective of them.

    The SMO and the sanctions have been a boon for Russia, economically and culturally, changing the positive opinion of the West to an ever increasing negative feeling and disgust with the degeneracy and trash milieu. Let's face it. The West is a sewer.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    Agree.

    There is a very real chance that humanity will revert to pre-industrial society in this next social change avalanche. Russia was “gifted” with a sort of protected 3 decade (1990-2020) of time to adapt. During this time interval Russia was looted, but its government (described at the time as a standard Third World kleptocracy) apparently devolved to the KGB, which surprisingly took its responsibilities seriously and took late Soviet society seriously [1], and over a series of threats/crises changed into the current Soviet society.

    At the same time, the US seems to be approaching something like Gorbachev’s attempt at reorganization. If Trump isn’t elected (does not serve as a Gorbachev analog), the US is still looking at a failure of the Globalization net that produces the global surplus that enables the Fed to inflate the US Dollar at will. Trump might fail, but there are others waiting in the wings, and the US Federal government has maybe a decade at most. After that, the US will find itself critically short of engineers and skilled workers who can build a new industrial plant.

    The PRC also has maybe a decade. Xi’s takeover appears to be an attempt to avoid the failure of the system that Deng Xiaoping set up in the late 1970s. As such systems do, thanks to the Kondratieff Wave, Deng Xiaoping’s system overshot, and now China is facing demographic and financial failures that may arguably be best coped with by a command government. In particular, PRC has more physical capital than it has resources to process them, the export market is precarious and, most importantly, more than can be supported by its young workers, its labor force of the future.

    This leaves Russia as the last stand of industrial society, the last country that has the land, labor, and capital mix needed to support an industrial society. Again, the Russian Federation may well take at least part of Europe as Federation members and as components of a Russian Federation industrial society.

    Again, please remember that this is a guess at a possibility, a “scenario”, and might not happen. I describe it to outline a fairly likely possibility.

    ******************************************************
    1] See:
    Alexei Yurchak; Everything Was Forever, Until It Was No More: The Last Soviet Generation; 2005-10-23; by Alexei Yurchak (Author). Surprisingly enough, there was a real society underneath the Soviet government, a society that had survived Stalin and had some intrinsic ideals that (I think) are the foundation of the current Russian government.

    It appears that the attempt to salvage from the wreckage of Stalin’s rule and WW II started under Khrushchev, who found that Russian society had become immune to even Stalinist levels of coercion and had devolved into a series of something like industrial fiefdoms, immensely inefficient and yet administratively unassailable (see: Red Plenty for a literary description of this time). His successors found much the same as had Khrushchev, the Russian industrial plant deteriorated, and the Russian government was, at the end, literally unable to pay for the electricity it needed to power some of its cities.

    The subsequent series of challenges to Russia and its government apparently produced a Russian response in a new form of Russian government that (at least for now) has effective control over its society, control has that not frozen Russian industry into an unproductive lump. This new Russian government is serving as a nucleus for at least a trade network.

    •ï¿½Replies: @dogbumbreath
    @Anonymous


    The PRC also has maybe a decade. Xi’s takeover appears to be an attempt to avoid the failure of the system that Deng Xiaoping set up in the late 1970s.
    �
    In the last 40 years, per the World Bank, China has lifted 770 million people out of absolute poverty (850 million overall), which represents 76% of World poverty over the same period. To put this achievement in context, that's over 2.5X the entire population of the USA:

    https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2022/04/01/lifting-800-million-people-out-of-poverty-new-report-looks-at-lessons-from-china-s-experience

    China today, does this look like collapse:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbywNxdtoe0&t=12217s

    Predicting China's economic doom is a cottage industry.
    The predictions have proven 100% wrong since 1949. Some examples:

    1990. China's economy has come to a halt. The Economist
    1996. China's economy will face a hard landing. The Economist
    1998. China's economy’s dangerous period of sluggish growth. The Economist
    1999. Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. Bank of Canada
    2000. China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. Chicago Tribune
    2001. A hard landing in China. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas
    2002. China Seeks a Soft Economic Landing. Westchester University
    2003. Banking crisis imperils China. New York Times
    2004. The great fall of China? The Economist
    2005. The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. Nouriel Roubini
    2006. Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? International Economy
    2007. Can China avoid a hard landing? TIME
    2008. Hard Landing In China? Forbes
    2009. China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. Fortune
    2010: Hard landing coming in China. Nouriel Roubini
    2011: Chinese Hard Landing Closer Than You Think. Business Insider
    2012: Economic News from China: Hard Landing. American Interest
    2013: A Hard Landing In China. Zero Hedge
    2014. A hard landing in China. CNBC
    2015. Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. Forbes
    2016. Hard landing looms for China. The Economist
    2017. Is China's Economy Going To Crash? National Interest
    2018. China's Coming Financial Meltdown. The Daily Reckoning.
    2019 China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? BBC2020. Coronavirus Could End China's Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak. NY Times
    2021 Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize. Bloomberg
    2022. China Surprise Data Could Spell R-e-c-e-s-s-i-o-n. Bloomberg.
    2023. No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. Bloomberg

    Replies: @Anonymous
  • @werpor
    @littlereddot

    I wrote a response to someone on another thread. It is as good a response as any to embrace your comment in its entirety.

    Here it is:
    werpor said on Unz.com
    June 11, 2024,  500 words

    @anarchyst
    “If jewry is to change and become human, the “good†jews will have to “feel the heatâ€.

    Yes very true. I have Jewish family. Most have no knowledge of Zionist/Jewish history. But how many non-Jews know their histories? People only think they know all kinds of things. Most people now-a-days never question the received. They never question the source of the things they â€know.†Most people get the news from the TV talking heads. They are propagandized.

    Some Jewish people I know well are intelligent professionals. Yet they support Israel no matter what.
    They may have growing doubts about the present regime in Israel, however they have no doubts about their Jewish inheritance as a precious inheritance. They seem impervious to feeling the heat. For them being Jewish is more than important. This is their identity.

    Being identified — not matter with what religion, or what political party, or with one’s own opinions, or with a sports team is a kind of madness. Shedding one’s identifications is a pursuit only done intentionally and with resolve. Our identifications have us rather than that we have them.

    When I was a young man in the 1960s some men would claim that they were Ford guys or Chevy guys.

    Even after discovering management planned for their cars obsolescence and they experienced a breakdown some men took pride in being able to repair them themselves. Even when a politician lets them down over and over again many people claim themselves to be Democrats no matter what — or Republicans no matter what.

    Same for Jews. No matter how badly treated Jews treat Jews they just shrug. No matter how badly Jews treat a Goy its OK — because…

    Jews are the most identified with their affiliation as though they were born Jews rather than brainwashed. Same for some sports fans — the Toronto Maple Leafs have not won a Stanley Cup since 1967. Yet it is apparently impossible to buy a ticket. You’d think the fans would get tired of paying to watch losers. The same is true for some of the NFL teams — but once a Minnesota Viking always a Minnesota Viking.

    Why? Because without an identification they would cease to exist! Of course, one only truly exists without identifications. Spend any time with Jews you’ll discover that almost all they talk about is being Jewish. Their jokes are about being Jewish or not being Jewish. Their politics revolve around being Jewish. They look forward intently to celebrating as Jews. Jewish holidays. Friday Shabbat. And another dozen or so Jewish holidays.

    If you are Jewish it is almost impossible to free yourself from the Jewish spell. To be identified with something is to be under a spell. It is like being seduced.

    The principal aim of seduction is to bring under control. The etymology of the word seductor from Latin is sēdūcŠis “lead astray†— how about that. To be identified is to have been lead astray.
    Jews are tempered by “heat†— they love their suffering.

    Oddly one of the first things one is taught when one seeks enlightenment under a master is the importance of giving up one’s suffering.

    In the way of an addendum:

    Quoting you.

    “I am already satisfied that in this physical lifetime, it is not even necessary or useful for me to ask this question. But I did so out of curiosity.â€

    Is this really true?

    In Japanese Buddhism *satori* is a first step. Think here something much like satisfaction but not quite.

    Ch’an expressions refers to enlightenment — most certainly not identification — as “seeing *your* self- natureâ€. But even this is not enough. After seeing your self-nature, you need to deepen your experience even further and bring it into maturation. You should have enlightenment experiences again and again and support them with continuous practice. Even though Ch’an says that at the time of enlightenment, your outlook is the same as Buddha you are not full Buddha.

    One may be satisfied, however “seeing into one’s true nature†or “essence†is a practice of long self observation. Which requires the development of both seeing outward and at the same time seeing within. This is a self observer not a critique of self. Just simply seeing one’s self as one is.

    Hint:
    When one truly sees — usually in a situation where one is identified — it is like a curtain raising *momentarily* — accompanied by a hit to one’s emotions — felt in the solar plexus. The ego is on guard though. The “ego†does not want to be seen. The “ego†is not you, though it is commonly taken as “Iâ€â€¦

    Satisfaction may very well be acquiescence. Outside, everything rosy — inside restless. Buddhist’s commonly meditate cultivating an inner silence — better of course, to see one’s self as one truly is — in moments when someone is stepping on your corns. Where then is this “satisfaction?â€

    Replies: @littlereddot, @Anonymous

    When I use the word “satisfaction”, I use it to describe my state of being at present time. Which is not urgently striving. To me, if it comes, well and good. If it does not, so be it. I do not seek my “true nature”. I seek to learn whatever lesson appears before me.

    When I use “satisfaction” it does not represent a satisfaction that I am “already there”. For I know that the revelation of wonders will continue for (effectively) eternity, and so will our own development.

    If I were satisfied that I have already arrived, then that state of being would more accurately say “self-satisfied”. Then that oft repeated quote comes to mind: “If you meet the Buddha upon the road, kill him”…isn’t the whole point of the quote never to be self-satisfied?

    From what you have written, so many questions arise. None of which I can probably answer satisfactorily in this lifetime, not that I really care if they are answered:

    When a man steps on my corn, and I remain placid, does that mean that I have arrived?

    Do we seek a placid nature because we associate it with the Buddha, and want to emulate him?

    Was the Buddha merely pointing us the way, or did he want us to become a facsimile of him?

    Did the Buddha “arrive”?……Does the Buddha, in whatever state he is currently, continue to progress and evolve?

    If so, is the direction that the Buddha took in his evolution, the only route for us? Is it necessary for us to emulate the Buddha? Or are other routes available?

    Please do not feel need to answer these questions. In truth I do not really care if I have the answer to them or not. Nor do I regard these “answers” as ultimate.

    •ï¿½Replies: @werpor
    @littlereddot

    Nature proceeds automatically — spring follows winter, summer follows spring, fall follows summer, winter follows fall — everything on Earth powered by the sun and moon. Some birds spend their entire lifetimes flying back and forth between the northern hemisphere and the southern hemisphere. Dogs chase cats. Boys chase girls. Life goes on. Everything is bound to happen — in general. For worms and fish and monkeys and man it is the same thing — in general. Everything is mechanical, happening inevitably and confirming inevitably to the diktats of its type — including man!

    Everything feeds on everything else — including feeding on us!

    Many people are familiar with Buddhism. There are rumours something higher for oneself may be obtained by pursuing the Buddhists way — a path to enlightenment. For most Buddhists their lives are changed positively by diligent meditation. But in most cases this is in conformity with natures laws — it is pursued mechanically. Many Buddhist can recite chapter and verse many aphorisms. No different than adherents of any religion — knowing the words in their books but failing to understand them. Everything obtained mechanically is inevitably lost the same way.

    There are truths in almost every book. But facts, trotted out when they seem appropriate are trotted out mechanically. Like political ideologies with which the adherents are identified — their books, their religions, their ideologies. Everything is mechanical. Real choosing is of course against the grain. When the sun lights up the eastern edge of the continent every morning millions of people are prompted to repeat the things they do every day — pursue life routines, entwined like cogs in a watch, or rather entwined in a giant mechanical whirligig.

    Routines include preparations to do evil — manufacturing drugs, manufacturing armaments, promulgating lies and ideologies, murdering, killing — done in thousands of factories and offices and back alleys by people completely oblivious of succumbing to the inertia of their mechanical lives lived like automatons. They fuck, have showers, drink coffee, brush their teeth, get dressed, check their email — all the while feeding the universe and getting nothing in return except tomorrow, while living lives of quiet desperation.

    If one already knows what one does is bad and does it anyway, one commits a ‘sin’ difficult to redress.
    In the evening they switch on their TVs, watching for further instructions. They watch mechanically and passively, rather than intentionally.

    Mechanicalness is the power of the universe. People imagine they are free. Yet they fill every moment with routines chosen by others. Their breathing is shallow. Their bodies deprived of oxygen. Even when they exercise they run on a treadmill. In rooms where the oxygen is depleted by recycling it in such confined quarters.

    What is much much worse they have no inner life. Ancient books and teachings spoke of this inner life. In translation aspects of these teachings were debased by thinking they referred to outer life. Of course people debased in body, mind , and emotions — manufactured by religiosity and conventional ideas had nothing themselves established within — to do other than reduce them to their own level of understanding.


    Many people have read or heard the Mulla Nasruddin story about his lost key.

    A man sees an anxious Mulla Nasruddin searching under a street light for something on the ground.

    When asked by the passer-by, “Mulla what have you lost?â€

    “I am searching for a key,†says Nasruddin.

    The passer-by and Nasruddin continue, both on their knees searching for the key.

    After a while the passer-by casually asks if Nasruddin could have lost the key elsewhere.

    Nasruddin answers “…yes, probably in my house over there.†Of course the passer-by jumps up and shouts at Nasruddin, “Then why are you searching for the key out here?â€

    Mulla Nasruddin casually answers as though it must be obvious, “ Because there is more light outside here than inside my house.â€

    Nasruddin’s message is looking outside, for that which is inside, is easy. It is easy to look outside in the light and see all the things that look like the solution to finding the key — religious beliefs, opinions of others, material things, intangible things like travel and more conventional education, attachment to various gurus, etc., all of which there is no shortage.

    Replies: @littlereddot
  • @Anonymous
    @dogbumbreath

    That's right, slink away. It's blowhards like you that actually run socialist governments.

    And you completely overlooked the exposition on Kondratieff wave. K-waves are not based on "agricultural economies", but are have shown up quite a few times: transportation (canals, railroads, rubber tire transport), mining (generally from more powerful explosives), solid state electronics, chemical fertilizers, consumer plastics, etc.

    In all cases where people can start their own businesses, there are a few early successes, widescale and profitable imitations, and finally, for a short time, most investments are unprofitable. That's the K-wave. In socialist governments, the first phase never gets off the ground -- because of people like you.

    Replies: @dogbumbreath

    That’s the K-wave. In socialist governments, the first phase never gets off the ground — because of people like you.

    Like I’ve suggested to you, get out of your Platonic Cave. Socialism provides the “foundation” free of charge so people can reach their potential. Why would anyone chose debt vs having a government provide free education, free healthcare, affordable food, housing and infrastructure to reach their potential?

    China is a Socialist/Market economy which allows for people to start their own business and become successful AFTER they get the foundation for free. Have you heard of Huawei, which is the leader in 5G and telecom worldwide? It’s 100% employee owned and started by an individual (that is every employee is already a millionaire; even the janitor). What about BYD the worlds biggest EV vehicle maker…yes bigger than Tesla? It’s also started and owned by individuals? What about Alibaba (profits bigger than eBay and Amazon combined)? Another Chinese company started by an individual. I could go on and on but you wouldn’t know anything because ignorance is bliss. Hasn’t it ever occured to you how a country like China (near the bottom of World GDP in 1949) can be the #1 economy in the World if Socialism doesn’t work? Word of advice, the meds prescribed by your doctor are not making you smarter and likely killing you.

  • @DanFromCT
    @Dr. Rock

    There’s this footnoted quip in Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom’s Breaking the Spell/The Holocaust: Myth & Reality, p. 48:

    In all of German-occupied Europe, there were 2.4 million Jews. After the war, 3.8 million Jews applied for Holocaust reparations. Tragically, the remaining 6 million were lost.
    �
    Or, in a different version:

    Of the four million Jews under Hitler in WW2, six million died, alas, and only five million remained.
    �
    Kollerstrom’s also quotes Norman Finketstein’s Jewish mother:

    If everyone who claims to be a survivor at Auschwitz really is one, then whom did Hitler kill?
    �
    And yet Congress wants to take away the livelihood and destroy the lives of anyone who even dares to deny the absurdity.

    Replies: @Dr. Rock, @GeneralRipper

    OY VEY!

    Stop the Hate!

    LOL

    Great post. Thanks.

  • werpor says:
    June 11, 2024 at 6:22 pm GMT •ï¿½900 Words
    @littlereddot
    @werpor

    I believe this is our first interaction, so I appreciate that you have taken the time to reply so thoughtfully with an unknown quantity, myself. You have written much this interesting to me, and will no doubt take months if not years to fully come to a satisfactory answer...if it is at all possible in this lifetime, or any other.

    Because I cannot come up with a point by point response I am satisfied with, for all your counter questions, nor do I think that they were meant to be answered overtly, I will only respond to a part that stands out to me. Perhaps from my response, I will reveal more of where I am, and so it would be easier for you to reply, should you choose to do so.

    How can one discern the far more subtle messaging coming from within? Your questions are not invalid. Millions of people have similar questions. But tragically seeking answers is usually unfulfilling.
    �
    Actually, I have found them extremely fulfilling. To me, the search is a delight. When I first started searching, I was promised by the "subtle messaging from within" that I would be shown wonder upon wonder. It has been true to its words.

    First one must find a genuine master — granted, almost impossible — who can demonstrate the means necessary to begin to listen. There can be no proselytizing, no preaching, no joining fees, no membership cards, no special garments, no secret words, no secret handshakes.
    �
    In my journey, I have come to rely on an intuition to guide me. I do not search frenetically, as I trust that "when the student is ready, A teacher will appear", I hesitate to use such cliches, but it was the most appropriate. It is my understanding that a "teacher" may not necessarily be human. It may not even even be intentional. Random circumstances, a stray thought while showering, all may be teachers. To me, human teachers are never permanent. Each teacher teaches what is relevant to be learned for that particular lesson, then both teacher and student moves on, either in life, or in death.

    In a way, my Intuition is now my current master. What Intuition is, or when it will cease to be my master, I do not know. I have a hunch that it is probably when I understand what Intuition is, or made of. Incidentally, this was the point of my original question to you....I want to understand whom/what is this force that I am guided by. Am I guilty of trying to kill my master...LOL?

    I am already satisfied that in this physical lifetime, it is not even necessary or useful for me to ask this question. But I did so out of curiosity.

    Now my masters are dead. They showed me how to attend to my questions. One must become quiet inside. Very still. Until the wild elephant is tamed. Only an attendant mind can tame the wild elephant. ..............
    A hint: The wild elephant has no interest in being tamed — believe me. Only an awakening master within can begin the task. But first one must find an awakening master without to show the way.
    �
    Thank you for your advice.

    Replies: @werpor

    I wrote a response to someone on another thread. It is as good a response as any to embrace your comment in its entirety.

    Here it is:
    werpor said on Unz.com
    June 11, 2024,  500 words

    @anarchyst
    “If jewry is to change and become human, the “good†jews will have to “feel the heatâ€.

    Yes very true. I have Jewish family. Most have no knowledge of Zionist/Jewish history. But how many non-Jews know their histories? People only think they know all kinds of things. Most people now-a-days never question the received. They never question the source of the things they â€know.†Most people get the news from the TV talking heads. They are propagandized.

    Some Jewish people I know well are intelligent professionals. Yet they support Israel no matter what.
    They may have growing doubts about the present regime in Israel, however they have no doubts about their Jewish inheritance as a precious inheritance. They seem impervious to feeling the heat. For them being Jewish is more than important. This is their identity.

    Being identified — not matter with what religion, or what political party, or with one’s own opinions, or with a sports team is a kind of madness. Shedding one’s identifications is a pursuit only done intentionally and with resolve. Our identifications have us rather than that we have them.

    When I was a young man in the 1960s some men would claim that they were Ford guys or Chevy guys.

    Even after discovering management planned for their cars obsolescence and they experienced a breakdown some men took pride in being able to repair them themselves. Even when a politician lets them down over and over again many people claim themselves to be Democrats no matter what — or Republicans no matter what.

    Same for Jews. No matter how badly treated Jews treat Jews they just shrug. No matter how badly Jews treat a Goy its OK — because…

    Jews are the most identified with their affiliation as though they were born Jews rather than brainwashed. Same for some sports fans — the Toronto Maple Leafs have not won a Stanley Cup since 1967. Yet it is apparently impossible to buy a ticket. You’d think the fans would get tired of paying to watch losers. The same is true for some of the NFL teams — but once a Minnesota Viking always a Minnesota Viking.

    Why? Because without an identification they would cease to exist! Of course, one only truly exists without identifications. Spend any time with Jews you’ll discover that almost all they talk about is being Jewish. Their jokes are about being Jewish or not being Jewish. Their politics revolve around being Jewish. They look forward intently to celebrating as Jews. Jewish holidays. Friday Shabbat. And another dozen or so Jewish holidays.

    If you are Jewish it is almost impossible to free yourself from the Jewish spell. To be identified with something is to be under a spell. It is like being seduced.

    The principal aim of seduction is to bring under control. The etymology of the word seductor from Latin is sēdūcŠis “lead astray†— how about that. To be identified is to have been lead astray.
    Jews are tempered by “heat†— they love their suffering.

    Oddly one of the first things one is taught when one seeks enlightenment under a master is the importance of giving up one’s suffering.

    In the way of an addendum:

    Quoting you.

    “I am already satisfied that in this physical lifetime, it is not even necessary or useful for me to ask this question. But I did so out of curiosity.â€

    Is this really true?

    In Japanese Buddhism *satori* is a first step. Think here something much like satisfaction but not quite.

    Ch’an expressions refers to enlightenment — most certainly not identification — as “seeing *your* self- natureâ€. But even this is not enough. After seeing your self-nature, you need to deepen your experience even further and bring it into maturation. You should have enlightenment experiences again and again and support them with continuous practice. Even though Ch’an says that at the time of enlightenment, your outlook is the same as Buddha you are not full Buddha.

    One may be satisfied, however “seeing into one’s true nature†or “essence†is a practice of long self observation. Which requires the development of both seeing outward and at the same time seeing within. This is a self observer not a critique of self. Just simply seeing one’s self as one is.

    Hint:
    When one truly sees — usually in a situation where one is identified — it is like a curtain raising *momentarily* — accompanied by a hit to one’s emotions — felt in the solar plexus. The ego is on guard though. The “ego†does not want to be seen. The “ego†is not you, though it is commonly taken as “Iâ€â€¦

    Satisfaction may very well be acquiescence. Outside, everything rosy — inside restless. Buddhist’s commonly meditate cultivating an inner silence — better of course, to see one’s self as one truly is — in moments when someone is stepping on your corns. Where then is this “satisfaction?â€

    •ï¿½Thanks: Odd Rabbit
    •ï¿½Replies: @littlereddot
    @werpor

    When I use the word "satisfaction", I use it to describe my state of being at present time. Which is not urgently striving. To me, if it comes, well and good. If it does not, so be it. I do not seek my "true nature". I seek to learn whatever lesson appears before me.

    When I use "satisfaction" it does not represent a satisfaction that I am "already there". For I know that the revelation of wonders will continue for (effectively) eternity, and so will our own development.

    If I were satisfied that I have already arrived, then that state of being would more accurately say "self-satisfied". Then that oft repeated quote comes to mind: "If you meet the Buddha upon the road, kill him"...isn't the whole point of the quote never to be self-satisfied?

    From what you have written, so many questions arise. None of which I can probably answer satisfactorily in this lifetime, not that I really care if they are answered:

    When a man steps on my corn, and I remain placid, does that mean that I have arrived?

    Do we seek a placid nature because we associate it with the Buddha, and want to emulate him?

    Was the Buddha merely pointing us the way, or did he want us to become a facsimile of him?

    Did the Buddha "arrive"?......Does the Buddha, in whatever state he is currently, continue to progress and evolve?

    If so, is the direction that the Buddha took in his evolution, the only route for us? Is it necessary for us to emulate the Buddha? Or are other routes available?

    Please do not feel need to answer these questions. In truth I do not really care if I have the answer to them or not. Nor do I regard these "answers" as ultimate.

    Replies: @werpor
    , @Anonymous
    @werpor

    This post is a Western comment on Buddhism. I'll admit that it's sort of like using a nihonga painting to clean a dirty floor, but it's not inaccurate.

    Buddhist’s commonly meditate cultivating an inner silence — better of course, to see one’s self as one truly is — in moments when someone is stepping on your corns. Where then is this “satisfaction?â€
    �
    That's when "satisfaction" gets dropped and your self knowledge/knowledge of others gets tested - navigating that situation is the secular reward.

    This is the age in the West of false friends and mass deception about human nature (e.g. the Feminist "abortion as a women's sacrament "). Seeing one's self as one is, and other people as they really are, is both difficult and basic survival necessity in a very badly fragmented West. To paraphrase "Life is just a bowl of cherries" so that it represents reality: "Life is target acquisition".

    Mousashi wrote in translation "Do not step heavily (to keep your balance). Do not hold your katana by the end of the hilt (to achieve a longer reach). Just step in and cut him down." That captures something. In Western society, Musashi's advice is best interpreted as "Act without thinking to neutralize the immediate threat and the legal/administrative aftermath of the neutralization", and perhaps that was the interpretation used in old Japan by non-samurai.

    Satisfaction for humans comes from somehow forming a family and successfully raising children who do much the same. Western demography suggests that this satisfaction is now rare, "the impossible dream", so impossible that neither men nor women cannot admit to having it, not even to themselves.

    Here's some validation of the above "impossible dream" thesis from the US population:
    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/06/11/poll-only-19-of-joe-biden-voters-say-society-benefits-from-marriage-having-children/

    Of course, demographics for all the industrial nations are now very similar.
  • @Anonymous
    @dogbumbreath

    "You main problem is your rigid thinking; Government can only be BAD. "

    I don't have rigid thinking -- had to drop it years ago. Some problems can be more or less solved by government control, others not. For an example, consider the deterioration in New York City after the police were largely defunded and the prosecutorial function was essentially ended for members of the street fighters. In this case, government and the problem largely under control, but then stopped efforts at control and the problem reappeared.

    "This is true when Oligarchy (Wealthy Capitalists) are the actual string pullers."

    Ah, if you know anything about history, industrialization was accomplished under an oligarchy (the British ruling class, whose laws made factory ownership and stock sale possible) by wealthy people who invested their own money and lives to build the first factories. Take a look at the history of the industrial revolution.

    Something similar happened in the US under the Progressives. The current system in the US has produced a concentration of wealth greater than that of all previous US history.

    " There is such a thing as a Sovereign Government (not being controlled by an Oligarchy) and such Governments are NOT BAD if the right leadership is selected. Socialist China is a present day example."

    China during the cultural revolution killed several tens of millions of Chinese (estimates vary), mainly through starvation enforced by bureaucrats who were trying to cover up their own failures and "look good" to Mao.

    Ah, you might say, "that was then and things are different now." Well, yes, and better in that the mortality rate is much lower just now. However:

    " Notice how China invented it’s own supply of vaccines for it’s populations and other good governments wanting to avoid the Western debt trap."

    The US imitated China, and caused very many bankruptcies in its retail sector. China (PRC) has the same result, but more so. China has supposedly lost over 90% of its urban retail stores. I don't know how safe or effective the Chinese vaccines are. I hope that they are much better than the US vaccines.

    " As for open borders, this is a result of “bad government†controlled by the Oligarchy. Isn’t this obvious?"

    Sort of, but the Democratic Party is the US socialist party, the closest thing we have to the PRC and CCP (which is a bad acronym, agreed, but standard in the US. The USSR used to refer to itself in English as the CCCP because the Cyrillic letters for USSR looked like CCCP) See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CCCP_(disambiguation)

    As for the "bad results come from bad government", I wish that were true, but it's only a bit of circular reasoning, a well known logical flaw called the "True Scotsman" argument ( See: https://www.scribbr.com/fallacies/no-true-scotsman-fallacy/ ) As for the US, we even have the current Democratic party imitating the PRC's Xi by trying to arrest and jail a previous US President Xi. ( See: https://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/11/11/world/china-xi-jinping-cpc )

    Actually, all industrial nations have been misallocating capital and running a demographically suicidal* social policy since WW II ended. It's almost as if we were lemmings jumping off a cliff into the sea, or perhaps a buffalo herd, spooked and headed for a cliff.

    https://assets.zerohedge.com/s3fs-public/styles/square/public/2024-06/comic-illusion.jpg?h=480d6280&itok=oCqaM1NR

    ********************************************************
    * Women were talked into the labor force in all industrial nations, had few children, and now the US doesn't have enough skilled and smart people to replace the Boomers. The situation is even worse in the rest of the world, including PRC, Japan, S. Korea, Taiwan . . . And, of course, in the Russian Federation.

    Replies: @dogbumbreath, @Poupon Marx

    If any country can solve this human replacement problem, it is Russia. Most of the women in high places in Russia are normally feminine and have children. Russian culture adores children and is very protective of them.

    The SMO and the sanctions have been a boon for Russia, economically and culturally, changing the positive opinion of the West to an ever increasing negative feeling and disgust with the degeneracy and trash milieu. Let’s face it. The West is a sewer.

    •ï¿½Agree: Z-man
    •ï¿½Replies: @Anonymous
    @Poupon Marx

    Agree.

    There is a very real chance that humanity will revert to pre-industrial society in this next social change avalanche. Russia was "gifted" with a sort of protected 3 decade (1990-2020) of time to adapt. During this time interval Russia was looted, but its government (described at the time as a standard Third World kleptocracy) apparently devolved to the KGB, which surprisingly took its responsibilities seriously and took late Soviet society seriously [1], and over a series of threats/crises changed into the current Soviet society.

    At the same time, the US seems to be approaching something like Gorbachev's attempt at reorganization. If Trump isn't elected (does not serve as a Gorbachev analog), the US is still looking at a failure of the Globalization net that produces the global surplus that enables the Fed to inflate the US Dollar at will. Trump might fail, but there are others waiting in the wings, and the US Federal government has maybe a decade at most. After that, the US will find itself critically short of engineers and skilled workers who can build a new industrial plant.

    The PRC also has maybe a decade. Xi's takeover appears to be an attempt to avoid the failure of the system that Deng Xiaoping set up in the late 1970s. As such systems do, thanks to the Kondratieff Wave, Deng Xiaoping's system overshot, and now China is facing demographic and financial failures that may arguably be best coped with by a command government. In particular, PRC has more physical capital than it has resources to process them, the export market is precarious and, most importantly, more than can be supported by its young workers, its labor force of the future.

    This leaves Russia as the last stand of industrial society, the last country that has the land, labor, and capital mix needed to support an industrial society. Again, the Russian Federation may well take at least part of Europe as Federation members and as components of a Russian Federation industrial society.

    Again, please remember that this is a guess at a possibility, a "scenario", and might not happen. I describe it to outline a fairly likely possibility.

    ******************************************************
    1] See:
    Alexei Yurchak; Everything Was Forever, Until It Was No More: The Last Soviet Generation; 2005-10-23; by Alexei Yurchak (Author). Surprisingly enough, there was a real society underneath the Soviet government, a society that had survived Stalin and had some intrinsic ideals that (I think) are the foundation of the current Russian government.

    It appears that the attempt to salvage from the wreckage of Stalin's rule and WW II started under Khrushchev, who found that Russian society had become immune to even Stalinist levels of coercion and had devolved into a series of something like industrial fiefdoms, immensely inefficient and yet administratively unassailable (see: Red Plenty for a literary description of this time). His successors found much the same as had Khrushchev, the Russian industrial plant deteriorated, and the Russian government was, at the end, literally unable to pay for the electricity it needed to power some of its cities.

    The subsequent series of challenges to Russia and its government apparently produced a Russian response in a new form of Russian government that (at least for now) has effective control over its society, control has that not frozen Russian industry into an unproductive lump. This new Russian government is serving as a nucleus for at least a trade network.

    Replies: @dogbumbreath
  • @werpor
    @littlereddot

    “In our prevailing consensus, we like to think that the body is controlled by the emotions, and the emotions are in turn controlled by the mind, being at the top of the pyramid…although IMHO in reality, they all influence each other.â€

    A master would ask you some questions. Is there a “prevailing consensus.†This ‘we’ you refer to is whom?

    You write “…they all influence each other.†True, the three — the body, the mind, and the emotions “all influence each other†but what good is that? Willy nilly — the mind, the body, the emotions influencing each other — but, is there a master in the house? There are, as you describe it three tyrants — each of the three clamouring for attention — but no master providing it!

    You write “…controlled by the mind.†What mind? Are our thoughts “…the mind? Perhaps a more precise language is necessary here?

    Mind is a potential. Do not conflate thinking with the mind. It is a weird idea when first presented that the fact is we seldom think — our thinking is our programming — our programming thinks us!

    Our bodies have a purpose but again there is no master in the house. Our bodies demand our attention — attend to its demands — I want chocolate, I want sex, I want sleep, I want love, I want a vacation, I want money, etc. and on and on and on — this “I†is not the real I.

    Sometimes the body is interrupted and the emotions intrude. The “I†one uses when one says I am hungry gets upset when the other “I’s†clamouring to be attended intrude. Feelings of frustration are not real feelings — those “feelings’ are merely a reaction. They may use the energy of real emotions but they are reaction.

    Most so called thinking is just the vocal expression of reconciliation. Out of your mouth comes something like — I think we should have pizza for a change. Many so called thoughts are thoughts we are barely conscious of having us. One experiences the outcome rather than being the result of deliberate thinking.

    Allow me to set that up: You are invited to a party, say. One you are not keen on attending. A friend says “…she will be there.†Next thing you recall you are home after the party. You hang up your expensive new leather jacket. You see a pile of mail on the table with the logo of your credit card provider in the corners of the envelope. Suddenly you need a drink. You reach for the bottle of wine in the refrigerator and there is barely a thimble of wine left in the bottle. “Damn it!†You slam the fridge and the note to yourself stuck to the fridge door reminding you of an early morning appointment flutters onto the floor. “Double damn it!†On the way to your bedroom you see the sleeve of your new leather jacket as you brush by the closet. …Which freshens up the memory of the party.

    “Shit†you exclaim, “…she wasn’t even at the bloody party.†Next morning you get up early. You are still peeved, but noticing the newspaper on the way out the door you read the headline. Your company just announced a huge sale of their product, providing generators for a new dam — a contract you didn’t expect would happen. Suddenly you feel elated. Smiling, you begin thinking about a new car …

    And so it goes — your life, that is.


    Were *your* emotions controlled by *your* mind? Or were *your* emotions completely controlled by externalities? In fact there is no master in *your* house whatsoever — is there? The mind was barely observing its reality. It has never developed. The mind has enormous potential. But we are merely automatons. Our attention is frittered away on externalities. We conform because it’s comforting.

    However, before the mind can be trained, there must a trickle of something which intrudes emanating from the mind hinting at its neglect. An attendant question is what am I? Most ignore the trickle. We allow that mind — the higher mind — and the attendant question to be at best denigrated and at worst mocked. Not often mocked directly but indirectly, by the constant demands of our modern spokespersons; politicians, ideologues, advertisers, media babblers, teachers within the educational system, and not least the blathering nonsense of mass religiosity — all clamouring to be heard.

    How can one discern the far more subtle messaging coming from within? Your questions are not invalid. Millions of people have similar questions. But tragically seeking answers is usually unfulfilling. An ordinary group of people endlessly debate the meaning of life. The answer cannot be found among the equally confused.

    First one must find a genuine master — granted, almost impossible — who can demonstrate the means necessary to begin to listen. There can be no proselytizing, no preaching, no joining fees, no membership cards, no special garments, no secret words, no secret handshakes.

    First you must have a host of questions which you constantly strive to have answered. Unlike most people who only have answers, sincere questions attract. Sincere questions are something similar to magnetism. Of course this searching can only be done sincerely. Most men live lives fulfilling an ordinary destiny. However exalted or lowly as manifested every day by hundreds of millions they are like the billions of seeds falling on the ground in a forest. Only a very few successfully seed a new generative body.

    This is an ancient message. Most often the messengers are killed. While sometimes their messages are appropriated by power possessing people which they use for their own ends. This is a tower of babble.

    Incidentally, I seek no followers. I belong to no groups. I have no published books or pamphlets. I was fortunate in my life. I never stopped asking questions. I have read thousands of books and burned the candles well into the early mornings. That was then.

    Now my masters are dead. They showed me how to attend to my questions. One must become quiet inside. Very still. Until the wild elephant is tamed. Only an attendant mind can tame the wild elephant.

    It is doubtful you will find support among your friends, family, neighbours, community. Search but keep it to yourself. One day you may discover how alone is the searcher. Never proselytize. Your message will fall on ears that cannot hear.

    A hint: The wild elephant has no interest in being tamed — believe me. Only an awakening master within can begin the task. But first one must find an awakening master without to show the way.

    Replies: @littlereddot, @Odd Rabbit, @Poupon Marx

    Now my masters are dead. They showed me how to attend to my questions. One must become quiet inside.

    Fear not. I am here. At you service.

  • Anonymous[166] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:
    June 11, 2024 at 1:18 pm GMT •ï¿½300 Words
    @Blissex
    @Anonymous

    «In retrospect, the US economy was, as you suggest, steered to unproductive “gain takingâ€Â»

    In the financial jargon is called "asset stripping" and it is immensely profitable. It is the recommended business strategy in the relevant quadrant of the Bain Consulting Group "growth-share matrix", which originally was applied to products, then to whole companies, and not to entire economies:

    https://www.bcg.com/publications/1970/strategy-the-product-portfolio
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Growth%E2%80%93share_matrix

    Many regions of the USA some decades ago were classified as "cash cow" and in recent decades as "dog".

    Replies: @Anonymous

    I have read both your links. Good point.

    I came across this methodology a few decades ago. It was phrased very simply, apparently for halfwits. Using the terminology in the links you posted, the assigned task of the executive was to:
    * Milk the cow.
    * Feed the star.
    * Shoot the dog.

    Note that the executive (1) is not tasked with making stars — just feeding them, and (2) that there is nothing in the three tasks that says the executive need “feed the star” as opposed to pretending to “feed the star” and giving himself a very high salary or taking a stock option and using “star” money to buy back stock so as to raise stock prices.

    Example: Apparently (1) and (2) have combined to gut the Boeing corporation.

    The early phase of the Kondratieff cycle (K-cycle) cannot get started when large corporations have a monopsony on the entire national economy. ( See: https://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/land-of-the-free/#comment-6610342 for a description of the K-cycle in contemporary solid state electronics. ) This remains true when a socialist/communist/fascist (or “command economy”) government has a monopoly on the entire national economy, the only difference being that politicians accompany the executives in asset stripping.

    For a description of this process in the 1930s, see: Wolfgang Schivelbusch; Three New Deals: Reflections on Roosevelt’s America, Mussolini’s Italy, and Hitler’s Germany, 1933–1939. In all three cases, money was spent in applying well understood engineering to areas that would not pay off the investment. Stalin did much the same. All four spent their money preparing for WW II and solidifying their popularity; only the New Deal’s investments actually produced a benefit (West Coast shipyards that built aircraft carriers) that was decisive during WW II.

  • Anonymous[271] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:
    @dogbumbreath
    @Anonymous

    There is no point replying as you are 100% living inside Plato's Cave (watching shadows and thinking it's truth), You have zero clue what is really happening in the World and just repeating Western propaganda.

    2 random videos on YT:

    Shanghai:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=577UeBof9_I

    Los Angelas:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3O15wiCWz60&t=600s

    Good Luck!

    Replies: @Anonymous

    That’s right, slink away. It’s blowhards like you that actually run socialist governments.

    And you completely overlooked the exposition on Kondratieff wave. K-waves are not based on “agricultural economies”, but are have shown up quite a few times: transportation (canals, railroads, rubber tire transport), mining (generally from more powerful explosives), solid state electronics, chemical fertilizers, consumer plastics, etc.

    In all cases where people can start their own businesses, there are a few early successes, widescale and profitable imitations, and finally, for a short time, most investments are unprofitable. That’s the K-wave. In socialist governments, the first phase never gets off the ground — because of people like you.

    •ï¿½Replies: @dogbumbreath
    @Anonymous


    That’s the K-wave. In socialist governments, the first phase never gets off the ground — because of people like you.
    �
    Like I've suggested to you, get out of your Platonic Cave. Socialism provides the "foundation" free of charge so people can reach their potential. Why would anyone chose debt vs having a government provide free education, free healthcare, affordable food, housing and infrastructure to reach their potential?

    China is a Socialist/Market economy which allows for people to start their own business and become successful AFTER they get the foundation for free. Have you heard of Huawei, which is the leader in 5G and telecom worldwide? It's 100% employee owned and started by an individual (that is every employee is already a millionaire; even the janitor). What about BYD the worlds biggest EV vehicle maker...yes bigger than Tesla? It's also started and owned by individuals? What about Alibaba (profits bigger than eBay and Amazon combined)? Another Chinese company started by an individual. I could go on and on but you wouldn't know anything because ignorance is bliss. Hasn't it ever occured to you how a country like China (near the bottom of World GDP in 1949) can be the #1 economy in the World if Socialism doesn't work? Word of advice, the meds prescribed by your doctor are not making you smarter and likely killing you.
  • @werpor
    @littlereddot

    “In our prevailing consensus, we like to think that the body is controlled by the emotions, and the emotions are in turn controlled by the mind, being at the top of the pyramid…although IMHO in reality, they all influence each other.â€

    A master would ask you some questions. Is there a “prevailing consensus.†This ‘we’ you refer to is whom?

    You write “…they all influence each other.†True, the three — the body, the mind, and the emotions “all influence each other†but what good is that? Willy nilly — the mind, the body, the emotions influencing each other — but, is there a master in the house? There are, as you describe it three tyrants — each of the three clamouring for attention — but no master providing it!

    You write “…controlled by the mind.†What mind? Are our thoughts “…the mind? Perhaps a more precise language is necessary here?

    Mind is a potential. Do not conflate thinking with the mind. It is a weird idea when first presented that the fact is we seldom think — our thinking is our programming — our programming thinks us!

    Our bodies have a purpose but again there is no master in the house. Our bodies demand our attention — attend to its demands — I want chocolate, I want sex, I want sleep, I want love, I want a vacation, I want money, etc. and on and on and on — this “I†is not the real I.

    Sometimes the body is interrupted and the emotions intrude. The “I†one uses when one says I am hungry gets upset when the other “I’s†clamouring to be attended intrude. Feelings of frustration are not real feelings — those “feelings’ are merely a reaction. They may use the energy of real emotions but they are reaction.

    Most so called thinking is just the vocal expression of reconciliation. Out of your mouth comes something like — I think we should have pizza for a change. Many so called thoughts are thoughts we are barely conscious of having us. One experiences the outcome rather than being the result of deliberate thinking.

    Allow me to set that up: You are invited to a party, say. One you are not keen on attending. A friend says “…she will be there.†Next thing you recall you are home after the party. You hang up your expensive new leather jacket. You see a pile of mail on the table with the logo of your credit card provider in the corners of the envelope. Suddenly you need a drink. You reach for the bottle of wine in the refrigerator and there is barely a thimble of wine left in the bottle. “Damn it!†You slam the fridge and the note to yourself stuck to the fridge door reminding you of an early morning appointment flutters onto the floor. “Double damn it!†On the way to your bedroom you see the sleeve of your new leather jacket as you brush by the closet. …Which freshens up the memory of the party.

    “Shit†you exclaim, “…she wasn’t even at the bloody party.†Next morning you get up early. You are still peeved, but noticing the newspaper on the way out the door you read the headline. Your company just announced a huge sale of their product, providing generators for a new dam — a contract you didn’t expect would happen. Suddenly you feel elated. Smiling, you begin thinking about a new car …

    And so it goes — your life, that is.


    Were *your* emotions controlled by *your* mind? Or were *your* emotions completely controlled by externalities? In fact there is no master in *your* house whatsoever — is there? The mind was barely observing its reality. It has never developed. The mind has enormous potential. But we are merely automatons. Our attention is frittered away on externalities. We conform because it’s comforting.

    However, before the mind can be trained, there must a trickle of something which intrudes emanating from the mind hinting at its neglect. An attendant question is what am I? Most ignore the trickle. We allow that mind — the higher mind — and the attendant question to be at best denigrated and at worst mocked. Not often mocked directly but indirectly, by the constant demands of our modern spokespersons; politicians, ideologues, advertisers, media babblers, teachers within the educational system, and not least the blathering nonsense of mass religiosity — all clamouring to be heard.

    How can one discern the far more subtle messaging coming from within? Your questions are not invalid. Millions of people have similar questions. But tragically seeking answers is usually unfulfilling. An ordinary group of people endlessly debate the meaning of life. The answer cannot be found among the equally confused.

    First one must find a genuine master — granted, almost impossible — who can demonstrate the means necessary to begin to listen. There can be no proselytizing, no preaching, no joining fees, no membership cards, no special garments, no secret words, no secret handshakes.

    First you must have a host of questions which you constantly strive to have answered. Unlike most people who only have answers, sincere questions attract. Sincere questions are something similar to magnetism. Of course this searching can only be done sincerely. Most men live lives fulfilling an ordinary destiny. However exalted or lowly as manifested every day by hundreds of millions they are like the billions of seeds falling on the ground in a forest. Only a very few successfully seed a new generative body.

    This is an ancient message. Most often the messengers are killed. While sometimes their messages are appropriated by power possessing people which they use for their own ends. This is a tower of babble.

    Incidentally, I seek no followers. I belong to no groups. I have no published books or pamphlets. I was fortunate in my life. I never stopped asking questions. I have read thousands of books and burned the candles well into the early mornings. That was then.

    Now my masters are dead. They showed me how to attend to my questions. One must become quiet inside. Very still. Until the wild elephant is tamed. Only an attendant mind can tame the wild elephant.

    It is doubtful you will find support among your friends, family, neighbours, community. Search but keep it to yourself. One day you may discover how alone is the searcher. Never proselytize. Your message will fall on ears that cannot hear.

    A hint: The wild elephant has no interest in being tamed — believe me. Only an awakening master within can begin the task. But first one must find an awakening master without to show the way.

    Replies: @littlereddot, @Odd Rabbit, @Poupon Marx

    “Our bodies have a purpose but again there is no master in the house. Our bodies demand our attention — attend to its demands — I want chocolate, I want sex, I want sleep, I want love, I want a vacation, I want money, etc. and on and on and on — this “I†is not the real I.”

    When there is no real Self the body//the genes// are the masters of the house and we behave as their slaves. The ‘gene-parlament’ is the boss, not the ‘neuro-parlament’/mind or our self.
    Excerpt from the link:
    —[…The conscious ‘rational brain’, centred in the pre- frontal cortex, begins to fire up some 500 milliseconds later— after the board of genetic directors in the basement have had time to assess the incoming data for any concealed threats to their security and survival. If threats are implicit in the data, the parliament of genes overwhelms the rational brain with a flood of emotion and issues a set of directives for well-proven genetic behaviour.
    So emotion is the flag of genetic behaviour and sig- nals that the rational brain has been bypassed in the interest of long-term genetic survival. If our Amygdala has been triggered, we react ‘instinctively’ with anger, lust or fear. If not, then we think and act ‘morally’—out of love, duty, or a sense of justice and compassion. Meanwhile the brain’s propaganda department patches together a reasoned explanation for that behaviour in order to maintain a reassuring facade of rational ‘free will’. ®]–
    http://www.zo.utexas.edu/courses/THOC/enigma_code.pdf

  • question says:
    June 11, 2024 at 5:35 am GMT •ï¿½100 Words
    @question
    @question

    Oh I forgot to mention the Cashin approach, it could be the most productive of all.

    Replies: @question

    And maybe simplest of all, hold some treasuries at treasury direct. If the govt wants to take them nothing will stop them, but risk from the private sector implosion should be nil, and that’s where the whole story is supposed to happen.

    There’s a lot more you can do than the fear porn spreaders admit, which is why I’m suspicious about the whole story.

    You don’t need a broker. And the fear porn is all about the private sector brokerage system and the house of cards falling down. It isn’t about the govt system. But don’t take my word for it. Research it.

    Treasuries at treasury direct.

    •ï¿½Thanks: 1jonny
  • @question
    @Notsofast

    Well there's the kind of things traditionally refered to, land property, gold and other metals. They aren't in derivative markets or subject to them if owned out right? If you own a boat is it in the derivative markets, or subject to them? Surely claims priority in finance markets doesn't extend out side of those markets.

    If a person owes something, assets can be seized, but if ownership is clear title that should still mean something. If out of debt that should mean something.

    The big problem is govt seizure, independently of markets. There is always that as a counter party risk.

    Another thing, remember Ken Lay: his insurance policy couldn't be touched. So it's really a matter of personal resource and will. Will any insurance company survive the derivative destruction? I don't know. Hard assets might be the only way.

    It's not very imaginative, but it's worked before.

    Replies: @question

    Oh I forgot to mention the Cashin approach, it could be the most productive of all.

    •ï¿½Replies: @question
    @question

    And maybe simplest of all, hold some treasuries at treasury direct. If the govt wants to take them nothing will stop them, but risk from the private sector implosion should be nil, and that's where the whole story is supposed to happen.

    There's a lot more you can do than the fear porn spreaders admit, which is why I'm suspicious about the whole story.

    You don't need a broker. And the fear porn is all about the private sector brokerage system and the house of cards falling down. It isn't about the govt system. But don't take my word for it. Research it.

    Treasuries at treasury direct.
  • @Anonymous
    @dogbumbreath

    "You main problem is your rigid thinking; Government can only be BAD. "

    I don't have rigid thinking -- had to drop it years ago. Some problems can be more or less solved by government control, others not. For an example, consider the deterioration in New York City after the police were largely defunded and the prosecutorial function was essentially ended for members of the street fighters. In this case, government and the problem largely under control, but then stopped efforts at control and the problem reappeared.

    "This is true when Oligarchy (Wealthy Capitalists) are the actual string pullers."

    Ah, if you know anything about history, industrialization was accomplished under an oligarchy (the British ruling class, whose laws made factory ownership and stock sale possible) by wealthy people who invested their own money and lives to build the first factories. Take a look at the history of the industrial revolution.

    Something similar happened in the US under the Progressives. The current system in the US has produced a concentration of wealth greater than that of all previous US history.

    " There is such a thing as a Sovereign Government (not being controlled by an Oligarchy) and such Governments are NOT BAD if the right leadership is selected. Socialist China is a present day example."

    China during the cultural revolution killed several tens of millions of Chinese (estimates vary), mainly through starvation enforced by bureaucrats who were trying to cover up their own failures and "look good" to Mao.

    Ah, you might say, "that was then and things are different now." Well, yes, and better in that the mortality rate is much lower just now. However:

    " Notice how China invented it’s own supply of vaccines for it’s populations and other good governments wanting to avoid the Western debt trap."

    The US imitated China, and caused very many bankruptcies in its retail sector. China (PRC) has the same result, but more so. China has supposedly lost over 90% of its urban retail stores. I don't know how safe or effective the Chinese vaccines are. I hope that they are much better than the US vaccines.

    " As for open borders, this is a result of “bad government†controlled by the Oligarchy. Isn’t this obvious?"

    Sort of, but the Democratic Party is the US socialist party, the closest thing we have to the PRC and CCP (which is a bad acronym, agreed, but standard in the US. The USSR used to refer to itself in English as the CCCP because the Cyrillic letters for USSR looked like CCCP) See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CCCP_(disambiguation)

    As for the "bad results come from bad government", I wish that were true, but it's only a bit of circular reasoning, a well known logical flaw called the "True Scotsman" argument ( See: https://www.scribbr.com/fallacies/no-true-scotsman-fallacy/ ) As for the US, we even have the current Democratic party imitating the PRC's Xi by trying to arrest and jail a previous US President Xi. ( See: https://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/11/11/world/china-xi-jinping-cpc )

    Actually, all industrial nations have been misallocating capital and running a demographically suicidal* social policy since WW II ended. It's almost as if we were lemmings jumping off a cliff into the sea, or perhaps a buffalo herd, spooked and headed for a cliff.

    https://assets.zerohedge.com/s3fs-public/styles/square/public/2024-06/comic-illusion.jpg?h=480d6280&itok=oCqaM1NR

    ********************************************************
    * Women were talked into the labor force in all industrial nations, had few children, and now the US doesn't have enough skilled and smart people to replace the Boomers. The situation is even worse in the rest of the world, including PRC, Japan, S. Korea, Taiwan . . . And, of course, in the Russian Federation.

    Replies: @dogbumbreath, @Poupon Marx

    There is no point replying as you are 100% living inside Plato’s Cave (watching shadows and thinking it’s truth), You have zero clue what is really happening in the World and just repeating Western propaganda.

    2 random videos on YT:

    Shanghai:

    Video Link
    Los Angelas:

    Video Link
    Good Luck!

    •ï¿½Replies: @Anonymous
    @dogbumbreath

    That's right, slink away. It's blowhards like you that actually run socialist governments.

    And you completely overlooked the exposition on Kondratieff wave. K-waves are not based on "agricultural economies", but are have shown up quite a few times: transportation (canals, railroads, rubber tire transport), mining (generally from more powerful explosives), solid state electronics, chemical fertilizers, consumer plastics, etc.

    In all cases where people can start their own businesses, there are a few early successes, widescale and profitable imitations, and finally, for a short time, most investments are unprofitable. That's the K-wave. In socialist governments, the first phase never gets off the ground -- because of people like you.

    Replies: @dogbumbreath
  • Anynomous says:
    June 11, 2024 at 4:45 am GMT •ï¿½100 Words

    When you look at real history of american and british, they have always been slavers and users for thousands and thousands of years. They arent human, but animals, who are incapable to live on their own and by themselves. They always need to use others to survive and others to do work for them.

  • @TKK
    @Debras

    Sure, you dumb Cunt. I think you should go backpacking around North Korea, too.

    You really don't need to belong to a tour group. That's just Jewish propaganda.

    Go buy your ticket to Pyongyang take your backpack and be sure and check all your electronics. Also, I think you should wonder off from the pre-curated tour. I think you should try to leave your hotel at night and Dodge the Minders.

    Also, since you like to be a smart mouth, I think you should make some funny jokes about Kim Jong Il while you're there.

    Note: this is why people hate Americans, and especially American women. Here is a dumb Cunt, who believe she is spouting off, really burning me right? And she does not even have the slightest clue about what North Korea is. No one can go travel extensively in North Korea, you worthless slag.

    Replies: @Druid

    Typical kike response. Swear

  • @Commentator Mike
    @TKK

    But he's a foreigner so why should he behave there like you tell him? Did you behave like that in Thailand, Turkey, etc. defacing posters of the king, president, argue with cops, show disrespect to their leaders?

    Replies: @TKK, @Druid

    TKK is a super zio troll who should be ignored like meamjono and Jack Johnson.

  • question says:
    June 11, 2024 at 1:50 am GMT •ï¿½100 Words
    @Notsofast
    @question

    you ask questions but you offer no solutions.

    Replies: @question

    Well there’s the kind of things traditionally refered to, land property, gold and other metals. They aren’t in derivative markets or subject to them if owned out right? If you own a boat is it in the derivative markets, or subject to them? Surely claims priority in finance markets doesn’t extend out side of those markets.

    If a person owes something, assets can be seized, but if ownership is clear title that should still mean something. If out of debt that should mean something.

    The big problem is govt seizure, independently of markets. There is always that as a counter party risk.

    Another thing, remember Ken Lay: his insurance policy couldn’t be touched. So it’s really a matter of personal resource and will. Will any insurance company survive the derivative destruction? I don’t know. Hard assets might be the only way.

    It’s not very imaginative, but it’s worked before.

    •ï¿½Replies: @question
    @question

    Oh I forgot to mention the Cashin approach, it could be the most productive of all.

    Replies: @question
  • Odyssey says:
    June 11, 2024 at 1:41 am GMT •ï¿½100 Words
    @Poupon Marx
    @Odyssey

    I am only vaguely familiar with ancient texts, poetry, and epic literary works. Some people see great value and beauty in them; I am not one of them. I see them as primarily windows of understanding into important historical persons and events.

    Since I am a Buddhist in core beliefs, but very human, engaged technical and scientific individual, I work at reconciling or co-existing these two area on my holistc personal spectrum. In effect, I am a split personality.

    In all frankness, I find works of this type-which glorify war, gore, slaughter, blood for gold, etc, etc-to be a rather base and undesirable human condition and activity. Because it is "state", i.e., relevant authority sanctioned, does not make it any different than mass murder.. This is the line in the sand for Buddhists. No war has ever been fought on the basis of material gain in the name of Buddhism. Buddhism, if we recall, is a heretical offshoot of Hinduism [as was Buddha], and in my firm opinion is vastly superior to Hinduism. Which is overall repugnant to me.

    So, it would seem that these workd come from the same place in human consciousness. And that would be a primordial, pririmitve, low, and a karmic disaster; profane and grotesquely sinful.

    That is my take.

    Replies: @Odyssey

    Thanks. In that case, you might conclude that since Buddhism arose from Hinduism, and Hinduism arose from Vedism, brought from Europe by the Aryans, it was further developed in India. The similarities between Hinduism and the so-called Slavic (that is, Serbian, since the term ‘Slavs’ is only used since the 7th century CE) mythology have already been established. The coexistence of Aryans and Chinese (which included occasional wars, periods of peace, alliances against the Mongols) lasted almost 1500 years and is very little researched (e.g. Aryans came to Xinjiang 2600 years before the Chinese and 2800 years before Uyghurs).

    •ï¿½Thanks: werpor
  • Anonymous[231] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:
    June 11, 2024 at 1:25 am GMT •ï¿½600 Words
    @dogbumbreath
    @Anonymous

    You main problem is your rigid thinking; Government can only be BAD. This is true when Oligarchy (Wealthy Capitalists) are the actual string pullers. There is such a thing as a Sovereign Government (not being controlled by an Oligarchy) and such Governments are NOT BAD if the right leadership is selected. Socialist China is a present day example.

    Please read this: https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/economics/kondratieff-wave
    �
    Kontratieff published his theory in 1925 as his analysis was based on agriculture in the 19th Century. No one needs another theory to explain Natures cyclical cycles. What people need is an accurate account of how the "Oligarchy (Empire)" shapes economic cycles with events in the 20th Century such as WW1, great depression, WW2, Korean War, Vietnam War, Petro Dollar, Uni-Polar financial System, Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, Syrian Wars etc. There is always an "invisible oligarchic hand" that creates boom and bust cycles to syphon wealth to the Oligarchy. The 20th and early 21st Century is simply a continuation of Imperialism and Colonialism from the 16th Century.

    Note that the “6th K-cycle†did not start as anticipated — we got the COVID fraud instead. That implies that, rather than the K-wave causing the new “technologyâ€, the new “technology†causes the K-wave.
    �
    You are misinformed. The Covid fraud was an intentional event by the Oligarchy to continue the substantial fraud in the healthcare and pharmaceutical industries and NOT to prevent any 6th wave theory. The seeds of the so called 6th K-Cycle (wave) already began way back in 1881 when the Oligarchs (i.e Rockefeller Medicine) invented Germ Theory. ALL plan-demics are a result of malnutrition, poor human lifestyle choices, incorrect healthcare interventions and toxins (man-made drugs). The only correct point you make is Covid was a fraud because there is no such thing as a virus. This is a "germ theory" hoax:

    https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/the-truth-about-viruses:a

    The Covid scam was another "invisible oligarch hand" exercise by the Uni-polar Empire. Some intentions were to keep countries and continents controlled and dependent via more debt (i.e. selling medical aid like vaccines). To inject money into a bankrupt Western financial system without public pushback because money used for scam-demic purposes is unaccounted. To prevent and hopefully destroy competing economies (i.e. China) from challenging the Uni-polar Empire. The Ukraine and Gaza wars are events following the scam-demic for the same reasons.

    And your counter-argument is that “government knows bestâ€. Just as it did for COVID, Desert Storm, open borders . . .
    �
    I said "Good government" knows best, not ALL governments. Notice how China invented it's own supply of vaccines for it's populations and other good governments wanting to avoid the Western debt trap. As for open borders, this is a result of "bad government" controlled by the Oligarchy. Isn't this obvious?

    Replies: @Anonymous

    “You main problem is your rigid thinking; Government can only be BAD. ”

    I don’t have rigid thinking — had to drop it years ago. Some problems can be more or less solved by government control, others not. For an example, consider the deterioration in New York City after the police were largely defunded and the prosecutorial function was essentially ended for members of the street fighters. In this case, government and the problem largely under control, but then stopped efforts at control and the problem reappeared.

    “This is true when Oligarchy (Wealthy Capitalists) are the actual string pullers.”

    Ah, if you know anything about history, industrialization was accomplished under an oligarchy (the British ruling class, whose laws made factory ownership and stock sale possible) by wealthy people who invested their own money and lives to build the first factories. Take a look at the history of the industrial revolution.

    Something similar happened in the US under the Progressives. The current system in the US has produced a concentration of wealth greater than that of all previous US history.

    ” There is such a thing as a Sovereign Government (not being controlled by an Oligarchy) and such Governments are NOT BAD if the right leadership is selected. Socialist China is a present day example.”

    China during the cultural revolution killed several tens of millions of Chinese (estimates vary), mainly through starvation enforced by bureaucrats who were trying to cover up their own failures and “look good” to Mao.

    Ah, you might say, “that was then and things are different now.” Well, yes, and better in that the mortality rate is much lower just now. However:

    ” Notice how China invented it’s own supply of vaccines for it’s populations and other good governments wanting to avoid the Western debt trap.”

    The US imitated China, and caused very many bankruptcies in its retail sector. China (PRC) has the same result, but more so. China has supposedly lost over 90% of its urban retail stores. I don’t know how safe or effective the Chinese vaccines are. I hope that they are much better than the US vaccines.

    ” As for open borders, this is a result of “bad government†controlled by the Oligarchy. Isn’t this obvious?”

    Sort of, but the Democratic Party is the US socialist party, the closest thing we have to the PRC and CCP (which is a bad acronym, agreed, but standard in the US. The USSR used to refer to itself in English as the CCCP because the Cyrillic letters for USSR looked like CCCP) See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CCCP_(disambiguation)

    As for the “bad results come from bad government”, I wish that were true, but it’s only a bit of circular reasoning, a well known logical flaw called the “True Scotsman” argument ( See: https://www.scribbr.com/fallacies/no-true-scotsman-fallacy/ ) As for the US, we even have the current Democratic party imitating the PRC’s Xi by trying to arrest and jail a previous US President Xi. ( See: https://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/11/11/world/china-xi-jinping-cpc )

    Actually, all industrial nations have been misallocating capital and running a demographically suicidal* social policy since WW II ended. It’s almost as if we were lemmings jumping off a cliff into the sea, or perhaps a buffalo herd, spooked and headed for a cliff.

    ********************************************************
    * Women were talked into the labor force in all industrial nations, had few children, and now the US doesn’t have enough skilled and smart people to replace the Boomers. The situation is even worse in the rest of the world, including PRC, Japan, S. Korea, Taiwan . . . And, of course, in the Russian Federation.

    •ï¿½Replies: @dogbumbreath
    @Anonymous

    There is no point replying as you are 100% living inside Plato's Cave (watching shadows and thinking it's truth), You have zero clue what is really happening in the World and just repeating Western propaganda.

    2 random videos on YT:

    Shanghai:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=577UeBof9_I

    Los Angelas:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3O15wiCWz60&t=600s

    Good Luck!

    Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Poupon Marx
    @Anonymous

    If any country can solve this human replacement problem, it is Russia. Most of the women in high places in Russia are normally feminine and have children. Russian culture adores children and is very protective of them.

    The SMO and the sanctions have been a boon for Russia, economically and culturally, changing the positive opinion of the West to an ever increasing negative feeling and disgust with the degeneracy and trash milieu. Let's face it. The West is a sewer.

    Replies: @Anonymous
  • @question
    @Notsofast

    There are vast assets not affected, not susceptible, not exposed to the derivative market.

    The derivative problem is real, so it can cause problems even for those with good protection. And also it is fear porn. You can protect yourself. It's not all Potemkin.

    Replies: @Notsofast

    you ask questions but you offer no solutions.

    •ï¿½Replies: @question
    @Notsofast

    Well there's the kind of things traditionally refered to, land property, gold and other metals. They aren't in derivative markets or subject to them if owned out right? If you own a boat is it in the derivative markets, or subject to them? Surely claims priority in finance markets doesn't extend out side of those markets.

    If a person owes something, assets can be seized, but if ownership is clear title that should still mean something. If out of debt that should mean something.

    The big problem is govt seizure, independently of markets. There is always that as a counter party risk.

    Another thing, remember Ken Lay: his insurance policy couldn't be touched. So it's really a matter of personal resource and will. Will any insurance company survive the derivative destruction? I don't know. Hard assets might be the only way.

    It's not very imaginative, but it's worked before.

    Replies: @question
  • Anonymous[271] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous
    @littlereddot


    There are examples of different societies all around the world experimenting to get the formula right for them. I think it is a never ending process because these societies themselves change over time, and the formulas need to change with it.
    �
    Definitely agree. Experienced reality is always changing, and we must change with it or die.

    The problem with the current attitudes in the US, that people assume that the experimentation and adaptation of their system has ended. In a way, the Constitution that was written 250 years ago, has been turned into an idol, placed onto an altar and worshiped.
    �
    Definitely disagree with your metaphor. The US is made of States, and each State is different in population and resources ( https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2014/07/03/where-do-borders-need-to-be-redrawn/nine-nations-of-north-america-30-years-later ). Some of the States do do not live according to the US Constitution, and they (of course) believe it should be amended, possibly through "esoteric reading" (which originally meant changing the definitions of words within a small group, thus changing the interpretation of legal, political, or religious passages. "Pilpul" uses esoteric reading, so did the "emanations of the shadow of a penumbra" in a famous legal case, so does "Our Democracy". Opposite of "esoteric" is "exoteric", the reading of that same word by those outside the small group.

    Texas prefers the US Constitution as read exoterically. Texas has the legal right to withdraw from the Union, https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/CN/htm/CN.1.htm#:~:text=Sec.,unimpaired%20to%20all%20the%20States.
    and some Texans want to do that:
    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/new-texas-gop-platform-calls-secession-vote-resistance-federal-infringements

    Opinions in the US vary.

    New York, by contrast, believes that the esoteric reading of the US Constitution better comports with their way of life. New York wants the current system (called "Our Democracy") to continue.

    Note that there is an amendment provision in the US Constitution, most recently used in 1992 to increase Congressional pay (of course). However, Congress and Senate have not otherwise used that provision since 1992.

    In short, the US elite is changing the US system, but hiding that change from the US public, which is effectively powerless (and formally so if elections are fraudulent and not subject to auditing or review).

    The Code of Hammurabi (https://www.history.com/topics/ancient-middle-east/hammurabi) is the first codification of law known, about 3.8 kilo years ago. Since then, Western countries have tried to have a written law, the demos for protection from the king, and the king to secure the loyalty and minimize the looting of the demos. (The UK went with "common law" based on precedent and administered by judges and lawyers.)

    The US no longer has such a written law. First, there is too much law; nobody could read it in a lifetime. Second, the law is vague. Supposedly the average US citizen violates several Federal statutes a day. Finally, as the Trump case and the 1/6 cases and the US border cases and the Hillary e-mail server case show, the law is applied selectively and politically *.

    The people who want the Constitution read and enforced exoterically simply want a written law that they can actually obey. Other people prefer the current system.

    Granted that this is a bit different from Confucian government.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    * and is self contradictory. If genetics is not determined by genetics, but rather socially determined, how can Trans people be "trapped in the wrong body"? Law is being used for political dominance games. Example: Remember how dominant Feminists became outcast TERFS?

    Replies: @Anonymous

    Sorry, typo.
    ” If genetics is not determined by genetics, but rather socially determined, how can Trans people be “trapped in the wrong bodyâ€?” should read
    ” If sexual identity is not determined by genetics, but rather socially determined, how can Trans people be “trapped in the wrong body?”

  • @Notsofast
    @question

    well the biggest elephant in the room, is the ultraponzi scheme of the derivates market, with it's quadrillion dollar exposure.

    this is the real time bomb, because when the shit hits the fan, the chain reation will bring down the whole daisy chain of our potemkin economy that will be imploded. this is more than the sum total of all the world's money supply, it's an unimaginable sum that can never be made good.

    there's only one solution to this that i can see and that's a massive emp, to wipe out all their debt and give them the debt jubilee these crooks need to escape their crimes in "the great reset" they keep telling us about.

    unlike the traditional jubilee, this will only benifit the banksters and the little guy will suffer and once again be left holding the bag.

    Replies: @question

    There are vast assets not affected, not susceptible, not exposed to the derivative market.

    The derivative problem is real, so it can cause problems even for those with good protection. And also it is fear porn. You can protect yourself. It’s not all Potemkin.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Notsofast
    @question

    you ask questions but you offer no solutions.

    Replies: @question
  • @Anonymous
    @dogbumbreath


    You are missing the main point in Mefobills post. When the “State†and not “Private†Banks hold the reins to money creation and diversion of capital, the “intentional†boom and bust cycles that syphon capital out of the majority and into Elite pockets is reduced or eliminated.
    �
    Please read this: https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/economics/kondratieff-wave/ \

    Note that the "6th K-cycle" did not start as anticipated -- we got the COVID fraud instead. That implies that, rather than the K-wave causing the new "technology", the new "technology" causes the K-wave. That is, K-waves are not examples of Marxist exploitation, but rather of investment decisions and considerable hard work in science and engineering, which result in new human capabilities and return of capital to investors.

    Here are the details of the most recent successful "K-wave":

    The "computer revolution" depended in 1946 ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_transistor ) research in solid state physics, research that included fabrication of the first transistor. It took until 1960, 14 years, from that to the first integrated chip ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invention_of_the_integrated_circuit ), and 1971 to develop the first integrated chip computer, the 4004, with a word size of 4 bits ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_4004 ).

    Moore's law for processor speed failed shortly in about the year 2016,
    https://i.sstatic.net/tyjWM.jpg , 70 years after fabrication of the first transistor.

    and the Moore's law for transistors/die failed by 2016 ( https://cap.csail.mit.edu/death-moores-law-what-it-means-and-what-might-fill-gap-going-forward ), 45 years after the Intel 4004 release.

    That's at least 24 years of development followed by 45 years of a growing niche for profitable computer applications.

    That's 2016-1946 = 70 years from start to finish. From the 4004 in 1960 to 2016 is 45 years. Gee, the K cycle is about the 40-70 year length of an historic K cycle. . . What a coincidence!

    Investment is not easy; at best it is probabilistic. Investment in a brand new technology (such as canals in the early 1800s, or railroads in the mid 1800s) depends on a long interval of underfunded development followed by a period of early investors who are successful gamblers, a middle period of period of successful investors in profitable applications, and a late period of broke investors who try to apply the technology where it is not profitable, justifying it on the grounds that "Investments in x have always been moneymakers".

    Government is, historically, very bad at investing. In raw fact, government helped the corporations shut down the industrial labs from which came the first transistors. The corporations shut down the industrial labs because, to be blunt, its executives were too stupid to see commercial possibilities, and the success of spin-offs made them look bad. They also didn't like a "disruptive technology" that would, well, disrupt them. No new science, no new engineering. Government propaganda about the evils of competition and "creative destruction" didn't help, nor did changes in tort law, nor, later, did shipping US industry overseas.

    Summary: Government is not better at managing K-waves than anybody else. Government has shut down K-waves by shutting down industrial labs. No new science, no new K waves. Note that the science of medical revolutions dates back to the discovery of DNA's function & structure, 1953, but that it was never developed into the sort of useful medical techniques that could cause a K-wave. Instead, we got a fraudulent K-wave, with debilitating or deadly RNA vaccines and government discouragement of "racist" DNA measurement to predict individual reactions to medical drugs.

    So, yes, government management does eliminate the "boom and bust cycles", but at the cost of a stagnant pool of industrial techniques that require progressively depleted inputs and reduce the "have nots" to "have even less". Instead of "boom and bust" cycles that introduce new production or distribution methods, one gets a steady downturn followed by a sudden large downturn -- which the world is now.

    China thought it would forever have an effective monopoly on cheap labor, much as the US elite thought it would forever own Europe and loot Russia. Wrong.

    And your counter-argument is that "government knows best". Just as it did for COVID, Desert Storm, open borders . . .

    Replies: @dogbumbreath

    You main problem is your rigid thinking; Government can only be BAD. This is true when Oligarchy (Wealthy Capitalists) are the actual string pullers. There is such a thing as a Sovereign Government (not being controlled by an Oligarchy) and such Governments are NOT BAD if the right leadership is selected. Socialist China is a present day example.

    Please read this: https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/economics/kondratieff-wave

    Kontratieff published his theory in 1925 as his analysis was based on agriculture in the 19th Century. No one needs another theory to explain Natures cyclical cycles. What people need is an accurate account of how the “Oligarchy (Empire)” shapes economic cycles with events in the 20th Century such as WW1, great depression, WW2, Korean War, Vietnam War, Petro Dollar, Uni-Polar financial System, Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, Syrian Wars etc. There is always an “invisible oligarchic hand” that creates boom and bust cycles to syphon wealth to the Oligarchy. The 20th and early 21st Century is simply a continuation of Imperialism and Colonialism from the 16th Century.

    Note that the “6th K-cycle†did not start as anticipated — we got the COVID fraud instead. That implies that, rather than the K-wave causing the new “technologyâ€, the new “technology†causes the K-wave.

    You are misinformed. The Covid fraud was an intentional event by the Oligarchy to continue the substantial fraud in the healthcare and pharmaceutical industries and NOT to prevent any 6th wave theory. The seeds of the so called 6th K-Cycle (wave) already began way back in 1881 when the Oligarchs (i.e Rockefeller Medicine) invented Germ Theory. ALL plan-demics are a result of malnutrition, poor human lifestyle choices, incorrect healthcare interventions and toxins (man-made drugs). The only correct point you make is Covid was a fraud because there is no such thing as a virus. This is a “germ theory” hoax:

    https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/the-truth-about-viruses:a

    The Covid scam was another “invisible oligarch hand” exercise by the Uni-polar Empire. Some intentions were to keep countries and continents controlled and dependent via more debt (i.e. selling medical aid like vaccines). To inject money into a bankrupt Western financial system without public pushback because money used for scam-demic purposes is unaccounted. To prevent and hopefully destroy competing economies (i.e. China) from challenging the Uni-polar Empire. The Ukraine and Gaza wars are events following the scam-demic for the same reasons.

    And your counter-argument is that “government knows bestâ€. Just as it did for COVID, Desert Storm, open borders . . .

    I said “Good government” knows best, not ALL governments. Notice how China invented it’s own supply of vaccines for it’s populations and other good governments wanting to avoid the Western debt trap. As for open borders, this is a result of “bad government” controlled by the Oligarchy. Isn’t this obvious?

    •ï¿½Thanks: 1jonny
    •ï¿½Replies: @Anonymous
    @dogbumbreath

    "You main problem is your rigid thinking; Government can only be BAD. "

    I don't have rigid thinking -- had to drop it years ago. Some problems can be more or less solved by government control, others not. For an example, consider the deterioration in New York City after the police were largely defunded and the prosecutorial function was essentially ended for members of the street fighters. In this case, government and the problem largely under control, but then stopped efforts at control and the problem reappeared.

    "This is true when Oligarchy (Wealthy Capitalists) are the actual string pullers."

    Ah, if you know anything about history, industrialization was accomplished under an oligarchy (the British ruling class, whose laws made factory ownership and stock sale possible) by wealthy people who invested their own money and lives to build the first factories. Take a look at the history of the industrial revolution.

    Something similar happened in the US under the Progressives. The current system in the US has produced a concentration of wealth greater than that of all previous US history.

    " There is such a thing as a Sovereign Government (not being controlled by an Oligarchy) and such Governments are NOT BAD if the right leadership is selected. Socialist China is a present day example."

    China during the cultural revolution killed several tens of millions of Chinese (estimates vary), mainly through starvation enforced by bureaucrats who were trying to cover up their own failures and "look good" to Mao.

    Ah, you might say, "that was then and things are different now." Well, yes, and better in that the mortality rate is much lower just now. However:

    " Notice how China invented it’s own supply of vaccines for it’s populations and other good governments wanting to avoid the Western debt trap."

    The US imitated China, and caused very many bankruptcies in its retail sector. China (PRC) has the same result, but more so. China has supposedly lost over 90% of its urban retail stores. I don't know how safe or effective the Chinese vaccines are. I hope that they are much better than the US vaccines.

    " As for open borders, this is a result of “bad government†controlled by the Oligarchy. Isn’t this obvious?"

    Sort of, but the Democratic Party is the US socialist party, the closest thing we have to the PRC and CCP (which is a bad acronym, agreed, but standard in the US. The USSR used to refer to itself in English as the CCCP because the Cyrillic letters for USSR looked like CCCP) See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CCCP_(disambiguation)

    As for the "bad results come from bad government", I wish that were true, but it's only a bit of circular reasoning, a well known logical flaw called the "True Scotsman" argument ( See: https://www.scribbr.com/fallacies/no-true-scotsman-fallacy/ ) As for the US, we even have the current Democratic party imitating the PRC's Xi by trying to arrest and jail a previous US President Xi. ( See: https://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/11/11/world/china-xi-jinping-cpc )

    Actually, all industrial nations have been misallocating capital and running a demographically suicidal* social policy since WW II ended. It's almost as if we were lemmings jumping off a cliff into the sea, or perhaps a buffalo herd, spooked and headed for a cliff.

    https://assets.zerohedge.com/s3fs-public/styles/square/public/2024-06/comic-illusion.jpg?h=480d6280&itok=oCqaM1NR

    ********************************************************
    * Women were talked into the labor force in all industrial nations, had few children, and now the US doesn't have enough skilled and smart people to replace the Boomers. The situation is even worse in the rest of the world, including PRC, Japan, S. Korea, Taiwan . . . And, of course, in the Russian Federation.

    Replies: @dogbumbreath, @Poupon Marx
  • @Brad Anbro
    @THE Germar Rudolf

    You need to take your snide remarks and shove them where the sun doesn't shine, including your use of swear words.

    In case you are not aware of it, this is 2024 and NOT 1968, when I learned how to drive; when roads, for the most part, were in excellent shape and where driving courtesy was the norm and there was no such thing as "road rage."

    During the fall of 2019, I spent three weeks in Sweden, visiting my distant relatives and also many of the amateur radio (ham radio) operators that I had contacted over the years. The person with whom I was staying took me all over south central and southeast Sweden. At no time did I ever witness "road rage" or any driving that was not courteous. We were never "tailgated" once, nor did anyone ever pull out in front of us - they drove like drivers here in the USA used to drive in the 1960s.

    I distinctly remember that in the next few days after September 11, 2001, people here began to drive much more courteously, because they realized how precious life was. But that kind of behavior only lasted a few days and after that, they were back to their "Me First" driving habits.

    Wake up and see things as how they really are here. And take a good, long look in the mirror, while you're at it!

    Replies: @NotAnonymousHere, @THE Germar Rudolf

    You can’t ‘tailgate’ people who are breaking the law and common courtesy by hogging the passing lane and holding up traffic.

    And who says I’m tailgating when I’m behind them, flashing my brights and wanting to pass, and waiting for them to follow the law and get over.

    If you want to drive slow, i.e. the arbitrary speed limit or just a few over like a good little follow every rule to a T slave, go into the other two lanes and get the truck out of my way so I don’t have to change lanes a hundred time to get around you and all the other derp ass self centered Americans, just going some entirely safe speed over the speed limit.

    You don’t own the road, and definitely not the passing lane.

    I don’t care how fast someone is going, if they are wanting to go faster than me, it is my legal duty and common courtesy to get over and let them pass IN THE PASSING LANE.

    Now get lost boomer.

  • @NotAnonymousHere
    @Brad Anbro

    "Wake up and see things as how they really are here. And take a good, long look in the mirror, while you’re at it!"

    Preferably while driving. And I say that as the descendant of Holocaust survivors. Aren't we all survivors or descendants of survivors?

    With anti-semitism becoming the new cool thing in NYC schools, why is no one pointing out that the current administration is driving the country toward Nazism?

    Replies: @THE Germar Rudolf

    Hitler was right, and the good guy. The Goyim Know, stupid. Whitey is mighty, and waking up en masse by the day.

    There is no such thing as “anti-Semitism”… “It’s just a trick we Jews use (to control the narrative and peoples’ minds)” – Israeli Foreign Minister in an interview.

    100% of Palestinians are Semitic peoples.

    Yet less than 10% of modern day Jews are of true Semitic origin…

    90%+ are of Eastern European origin (hence why they look White and mostly spoke their European nations languages or the Germanic language Yiddish until after WWII) and have ZERO historical ties to anything Semitic, other than the Hebrew language the converted Whites started using when their Palestinian settler colonialist project ramped up.

    Read it and weep soy boy:

    justice4germans DOT wordpress DOT com

  • @Odyssey
    @Poupon Marx

    The root of the word 'preach' is the Serbian word 'veda' (=knowledge), which comes from the word 'vid' (sight, vision). 'Veda' is the root of many other modern words, e.g. - pripoveda (narrates), zapoveda (giving commands), propoveda (preaches), pripoved(k)a (fable), etc.

    We have been waiting here for a long time for someone to translate/explain the meaning of the Rg Veda title, but no one has succeeded so far, not even readers originally from India.

    Perhaps, as a good connoisseur of antiquity, you can contribute something.
    For example, where does the similarity between the Mahabharata and the Iliad come from?

    You know you know.

    Best wishes,

    O

    Replies: @Poupon Marx

    I am only vaguely familiar with ancient texts, poetry, and epic literary works. Some people see great value and beauty in them; I am not one of them. I see them as primarily windows of understanding into important historical persons and events.

    Since I am a Buddhist in core beliefs, but very human, engaged technical and scientific individual, I work at reconciling or co-existing these two area on my holistc personal spectrum. In effect, I am a split personality.

    In all frankness, I find works of this type-which glorify war, gore, slaughter, blood for gold, etc, etc-to be a rather base and undesirable human condition and activity. Because it is “state”, i.e., relevant authority sanctioned, does not make it any different than mass murder.. This is the line in the sand for Buddhists. No war has ever been fought on the basis of material gain in the name of Buddhism. Buddhism, if we recall, is a heretical offshoot of Hinduism [as was Buddha], and in my firm opinion is vastly superior to Hinduism. Which is overall repugnant to me.

    So, it would seem that these workd come from the same place in human consciousness. And that would be a primordial, pririmitve, low, and a karmic disaster; profane and grotesquely sinful.

    That is my take.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Odyssey
    @Poupon Marx

    Thanks. In that case, you might conclude that since Buddhism arose from Hinduism, and Hinduism arose from Vedism, brought from Europe by the Aryans, it was further developed in India. The similarities between Hinduism and the so-called Slavic (that is, Serbian, since the term 'Slavs' is only used since the 7th century CE) mythology have already been established. The coexistence of Aryans and Chinese (which included occasional wars, periods of peace, alliances against the Mongols) lasted almost 1500 years and is very little researched (e.g. Aryans came to Xinjiang 2600 years before the Chinese and 2800 years before Uyghurs).
  • @Anon
    @Harold Smith

    Who says I'm a jew? Moron

    Replies: @Harold Smith

    Who says I’m a jew? Moron

    You do, goofball.

  • @question
    @Notsofast

    Well that's all so interesting, you probably have interesting views on sound money, the marginalist revolution, supply and demand, cryptos and other things, and how those have smth to do with the American demise?

    Replies: @Notsofast

    well the biggest elephant in the room, is the ultraponzi scheme of the derivates market, with it’s quadrillion dollar exposure.

    this is the real time bomb, because when the shit hits the fan, the chain reation will bring down the whole daisy chain of our potemkin economy that will be imploded. this is more than the sum total of all the world’s money supply, it’s an unimaginable sum that can never be made good.

    there’s only one solution to this that i can see and that’s a massive emp, to wipe out all their debt and give them the debt jubilee these crooks need to escape their crimes in “the great reset” they keep telling us about.

    unlike the traditional jubilee, this will only benifit the banksters and the little guy will suffer and once again be left holding the bag.

    •ï¿½Replies: @question
    @Notsofast

    There are vast assets not affected, not susceptible, not exposed to the derivative market.

    The derivative problem is real, so it can cause problems even for those with good protection. And also it is fear porn. You can protect yourself. It's not all Potemkin.

    Replies: @Notsofast
  • @dogbumbreath
    @Anonymous


    I suspect, bring about the fall of the CCP and PRC, most likely within the next decade (by 2034).
    �
    Time to get out of your Platonic Cave and use some of that hard earned money to see what the USA has become and compare that to rest of the World. You are in for an awakening!!

    Predicting China's economic doom is a cottage industry.
    The predictions have proven 100% wrong since 1949. Some examples:

    1990. China's economy has come to a halt. The Economist
    1996. China's economy will face a hard landing. The Economist
    1998. China's economy’s dangerous period of sluggish growth. The Economist
    1999. Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. Bank of Canada
    2000. China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. Chicago Tribune
    2001. A hard landing in China. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas
    2002. China Seeks a Soft Economic Landing. Westchester University
    2003. Banking crisis imperils China. New York Times
    2004. The great fall of China? The Economist
    2005. The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. Nouriel Roubini
    2006. Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? International Economy
    2007. Can China avoid a hard landing? TIME
    2008. Hard Landing In China? Forbes
    2009. China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. Fortune
    2010: Hard landing coming in China. Nouriel Roubini
    2011: Chinese Hard Landing Closer Than You Think. Business Insider
    2012: Economic News from China: Hard Landing. American Interest
    2013: A Hard Landing In China. Zero Hedge
    2014. A hard landing in China. CNBC
    2015. Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. Forbes
    2016. Hard landing looms for China. The Economist
    2017. Is China's Economy Going To Crash? National Interest
    2018. China's Coming Financial Meltdown. The Daily Reckoning.
    2019 China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? BBC2020. Coronavirus Could End China's Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak. NY Times
    2021 Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize. Bloomberg
    2022. China Surprise Data Could Spell R-e-c-e-s-s-i-o-n. Bloomberg.
    2023. No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. Bloomberg

    Replies: @Mefobills, @mulga mumblebrain

    Race hatred, envy and rage at being outdone in everything positive does tend to rot the mind. These minds were pretty crap to begin with, as well. Here in Austfailia, EVERY story in the MSM regarding the PRC is negative. 100% ‘Freedom of Opinion’, don’t you know.

    •ï¿½Agree: dogbumbreath
  • @Notsofast
    @question

    this is the traditional way of dealing with inflation, volker put the u.s. rate to 20% at one time. they are playing within the "rules", of the western governments (that they themselves no longer follow). this is why the russians want to beat them at their own game, by their own "rules based order", while western economies are devoured by their own ponzinomics after having cut their own throats through illegal sanctions and boycotts. this also allowed them to decouple themselves from the western crazy train, before it crashes into the station.

    they are positioning themselves to replace the western hegemon, that usurps the national wealth of their vassal states and prevents the development of their economies and people. through the ever growing brics alliance, china and other member states will be able to follow suit and replaced the weaponized u.s. dollar in international trade, kicking the last leg out from under the bloated hegemon.

    look at the size of the national debt since 1980, we went from 900 billion to 35 trillion and counting in four decades. now realize our "federal reserve", is neither. it is 12 privately owned banks, that we can't audit, that give the president a list of 10 candidates of their choosing to appoint as head and we don't even know who owns these banks. they receive 5% of our money they create out of thin air and are incentivized to create debt. this is usery on a national scale.

    russias central bank is owned by the state and their rates will drop after their economy fully recovers, from the illegal sanctions and seizures. their gdp growth this year is 3.2% up from the 2.6% projection in january. germany gdp growth this year is .2%, the u.k. .6%, france .8%, u s. 1.3%. so who winning this economic war they started? they have been totally pants by the russians and look like the fools they are, to the rest of the world.

    most russians own their homes and many have dacha cabins as vacation homes. the price of housing in the u.s. makes homeownership impossible for the average worker, forcing them to be rent slaves and the price of an "affordable" studio apartment in my area is $2000 a month, while the minimum wage is $12/hr. we live in a rentier ponzi scheme. this is what klaus schwab meant when he told us, we will own nothing and be happy 😊 ðŸ˜.

    Replies: @question, @question

    The most important example of dealing with inflation in the history of the American economy was not the Volker shock.

    What was it and how was it handled?

  • @Rich23
    @muh muh

    No....pay attention.
    This Ritter fanbuoy club is the circular firing squad.

    The notation was CIA v NSA. Does it matter?
    There clearly isn't agreement nor coordination among the spooks and spies. Schizoids and Psychopaths/Narcissists rarely get along.
    CIA didn't exactly approve the NSA controlled pump n dump of Bitcoin circa early 2018 nor Admiral Mike Rogers sprint to Trump tower in 2016.

    Ritter is some weird amalgam of controlled opposition, limited hangout operator and all too typical failed Eagle Scout aspiring pedophile. Of course the latter trait is bidirectional. On one hand, Ritter's fans believe Ritter was unfairly tattooed with a pervert label in the typical State action. On the other hand, Ritter the pervert presents the perfectly useful blackmail target for CIA use.

    Still, how far did Ritter and his crew go to disappear Lira? The timing of Ritter's falling out with Lira's ultimate arrest and murder is impeccable. Ritter's silence is resounding and remarkable.

    Replies: @MoT, @Awakening Observer

    Poor Rich. I’m always suspicious when posters put down those who are openly opposing the puppet regime in the Di$trict of Corruption. How do you plead?

    •ï¿½Replies: @Rich23
    @Awakening Observer

    Who is opposing the puppet regime?
  • @Kurt Knispel
    ...and Ritter is right now useful to distract from the crackdwon on students (against Israhell).

    Replies: @ariadna

    Not to anyone who can chew gum while walking

  • Odyssey says:
    June 10, 2024 at 2:27 am GMT •ï¿½100 Words
    @Poupon Marx
    @Partic


    .Odd choice “preached†… In point of fact — a true master — asks questions. Such teaching is rather more cryptic in tone than preaching
    �
    I do not totally agree. "Preach" is defined as:

    to advocate or inculcate (religious or moral truth, right conduct, etc.) in speech or writing.
    Which is exactly what Buddha practiced. He talked and they listened.

    Now, "teach" implies a more elongated transmission, in time, and depth of subject. Many preaches make a teach.

    Being in the moment
    �
    Buddha taught that we should live in the immediate moment, to concentrate and adjust ourselves to full attention and Consciousness. Makes sense. Other than that, the concept of time is illusory. In meditation, time is a void, nothingness. Buddha was profound in that he was extremely parsimonious and one sentence could contain the meaning and complexity of many words. The answer lies within. It is already there. This is elucidated and expanded upon by C G Jung.

    You know you know.

    Best wishes,

    PM

    Replies: @Odyssey

    The root of the word ‘preach’ is the Serbian word ‘veda’ (=knowledge), which comes from the word ‘vid’ (sight, vision). ‘Veda’ is the root of many other modern words, e.g. – pripoveda (narrates), zapoveda (giving commands), propoveda (preaches), pripoved(k)a (fable), etc.

    We have been waiting here for a long time for someone to translate/explain the meaning of the Rg Veda title, but no one has succeeded so far, not even readers originally from India.

    Perhaps, as a good connoisseur of antiquity, you can contribute something.
    For example, where does the similarity between the Mahabharata and the Iliad come from?

    You know you know.

    Best wishes,

    O

    •ï¿½Replies: @Poupon Marx
    @Odyssey

    I am only vaguely familiar with ancient texts, poetry, and epic literary works. Some people see great value and beauty in them; I am not one of them. I see them as primarily windows of understanding into important historical persons and events.

    Since I am a Buddhist in core beliefs, but very human, engaged technical and scientific individual, I work at reconciling or co-existing these two area on my holistc personal spectrum. In effect, I am a split personality.

    In all frankness, I find works of this type-which glorify war, gore, slaughter, blood for gold, etc, etc-to be a rather base and undesirable human condition and activity. Because it is "state", i.e., relevant authority sanctioned, does not make it any different than mass murder.. This is the line in the sand for Buddhists. No war has ever been fought on the basis of material gain in the name of Buddhism. Buddhism, if we recall, is a heretical offshoot of Hinduism [as was Buddha], and in my firm opinion is vastly superior to Hinduism. Which is overall repugnant to me.

    So, it would seem that these workd come from the same place in human consciousness. And that would be a primordial, pririmitve, low, and a karmic disaster; profane and grotesquely sinful.

    That is my take.

    Replies: @Odyssey
  • @Partic
    If forced to speculate I'd guess Ritter's claim is bullshit.
    He seems to have become a quasi UTube celebrity, and his videos have become more and more bizarre as he ratchets up more and more extreme pronouncements on both Ukraine and Gaza. His lack of any real specifics about his passport seizure combined with his strange warning to the good Judge to cancel his Russia flight certainly strains credulity. Scott Ritter was a lonely and courageous critic of the 2nd Iraq war.
    His subsequent 2 arrests do seem suspect especially the first one, but unless the second one is an outright fabrication there does seem to be a little fire along with a lot of smoke. He's a complex character and both Ukraine and Gaza has seen his star rise, at least on Social Media. I hope for his well being this passport episode is real, but I won't hold my breath waiting for any real details.

    Replies: @Commentator Mike, @Poupon Marx

    .Odd choice “preached†… In point of fact — a true master — asks questions. Such teaching is rather more cryptic in tone than preaching

    I do not totally agree. “Preach” is defined as:

    to advocate or inculcate (religious or moral truth, right conduct, etc.) in speech or writing.
    Which is exactly what Buddha practiced. He talked and they listened.

    Now, “teach” implies a more elongated transmission, in time, and depth of subject. Many preaches make a teach.

    Being in the moment

    Buddha taught that we should live in the immediate moment, to concentrate and adjust ourselves to full attention and Consciousness. Makes sense. Other than that, the concept of time is illusory. In meditation, time is a void, nothingness. Buddha was profound in that he was extremely parsimonious and one sentence could contain the meaning and complexity of many words. The answer lies within. It is already there. This is elucidated and expanded upon by C G Jung.

    You know you know.

    Best wishes,

    PM

    •ï¿½Replies: @Odyssey
    @Poupon Marx

    The root of the word 'preach' is the Serbian word 'veda' (=knowledge), which comes from the word 'vid' (sight, vision). 'Veda' is the root of many other modern words, e.g. - pripoveda (narrates), zapoveda (giving commands), propoveda (preaches), pripoved(k)a (fable), etc.

    We have been waiting here for a long time for someone to translate/explain the meaning of the Rg Veda title, but no one has succeeded so far, not even readers originally from India.

    Perhaps, as a good connoisseur of antiquity, you can contribute something.
    For example, where does the similarity between the Mahabharata and the Iliad come from?

    You know you know.

    Best wishes,

    O

    Replies: @Poupon Marx
  • @werpor
    @littlereddot

    “In our prevailing consensus, we like to think that the body is controlled by the emotions, and the emotions are in turn controlled by the mind, being at the top of the pyramid…although IMHO in reality, they all influence each other.â€

    A master would ask you some questions. Is there a “prevailing consensus.†This ‘we’ you refer to is whom?

    You write “…they all influence each other.†True, the three — the body, the mind, and the emotions “all influence each other†but what good is that? Willy nilly — the mind, the body, the emotions influencing each other — but, is there a master in the house? There are, as you describe it three tyrants — each of the three clamouring for attention — but no master providing it!

    You write “…controlled by the mind.†What mind? Are our thoughts “…the mind? Perhaps a more precise language is necessary here?

    Mind is a potential. Do not conflate thinking with the mind. It is a weird idea when first presented that the fact is we seldom think — our thinking is our programming — our programming thinks us!

    Our bodies have a purpose but again there is no master in the house. Our bodies demand our attention — attend to its demands — I want chocolate, I want sex, I want sleep, I want love, I want a vacation, I want money, etc. and on and on and on — this “I†is not the real I.

    Sometimes the body is interrupted and the emotions intrude. The “I†one uses when one says I am hungry gets upset when the other “I’s†clamouring to be attended intrude. Feelings of frustration are not real feelings — those “feelings’ are merely a reaction. They may use the energy of real emotions but they are reaction.

    Most so called thinking is just the vocal expression of reconciliation. Out of your mouth comes something like — I think we should have pizza for a change. Many so called thoughts are thoughts we are barely conscious of having us. One experiences the outcome rather than being the result of deliberate thinking.

    Allow me to set that up: You are invited to a party, say. One you are not keen on attending. A friend says “…she will be there.†Next thing you recall you are home after the party. You hang up your expensive new leather jacket. You see a pile of mail on the table with the logo of your credit card provider in the corners of the envelope. Suddenly you need a drink. You reach for the bottle of wine in the refrigerator and there is barely a thimble of wine left in the bottle. “Damn it!†You slam the fridge and the note to yourself stuck to the fridge door reminding you of an early morning appointment flutters onto the floor. “Double damn it!†On the way to your bedroom you see the sleeve of your new leather jacket as you brush by the closet. …Which freshens up the memory of the party.

    “Shit†you exclaim, “…she wasn’t even at the bloody party.†Next morning you get up early. You are still peeved, but noticing the newspaper on the way out the door you read the headline. Your company just announced a huge sale of their product, providing generators for a new dam — a contract you didn’t expect would happen. Suddenly you feel elated. Smiling, you begin thinking about a new car …

    And so it goes — your life, that is.


    Were *your* emotions controlled by *your* mind? Or were *your* emotions completely controlled by externalities? In fact there is no master in *your* house whatsoever — is there? The mind was barely observing its reality. It has never developed. The mind has enormous potential. But we are merely automatons. Our attention is frittered away on externalities. We conform because it’s comforting.

    However, before the mind can be trained, there must a trickle of something which intrudes emanating from the mind hinting at its neglect. An attendant question is what am I? Most ignore the trickle. We allow that mind — the higher mind — and the attendant question to be at best denigrated and at worst mocked. Not often mocked directly but indirectly, by the constant demands of our modern spokespersons; politicians, ideologues, advertisers, media babblers, teachers within the educational system, and not least the blathering nonsense of mass religiosity — all clamouring to be heard.

    How can one discern the far more subtle messaging coming from within? Your questions are not invalid. Millions of people have similar questions. But tragically seeking answers is usually unfulfilling. An ordinary group of people endlessly debate the meaning of life. The answer cannot be found among the equally confused.

    First one must find a genuine master — granted, almost impossible — who can demonstrate the means necessary to begin to listen. There can be no proselytizing, no preaching, no joining fees, no membership cards, no special garments, no secret words, no secret handshakes.

    First you must have a host of questions which you constantly strive to have answered. Unlike most people who only have answers, sincere questions attract. Sincere questions are something similar to magnetism. Of course this searching can only be done sincerely. Most men live lives fulfilling an ordinary destiny. However exalted or lowly as manifested every day by hundreds of millions they are like the billions of seeds falling on the ground in a forest. Only a very few successfully seed a new generative body.

    This is an ancient message. Most often the messengers are killed. While sometimes their messages are appropriated by power possessing people which they use for their own ends. This is a tower of babble.

    Incidentally, I seek no followers. I belong to no groups. I have no published books or pamphlets. I was fortunate in my life. I never stopped asking questions. I have read thousands of books and burned the candles well into the early mornings. That was then.

    Now my masters are dead. They showed me how to attend to my questions. One must become quiet inside. Very still. Until the wild elephant is tamed. Only an attendant mind can tame the wild elephant.

    It is doubtful you will find support among your friends, family, neighbours, community. Search but keep it to yourself. One day you may discover how alone is the searcher. Never proselytize. Your message will fall on ears that cannot hear.

    A hint: The wild elephant has no interest in being tamed — believe me. Only an awakening master within can begin the task. But first one must find an awakening master without to show the way.

    Replies: @littlereddot, @Odd Rabbit, @Poupon Marx

    I believe this is our first interaction, so I appreciate that you have taken the time to reply so thoughtfully with an unknown quantity, myself. You have written much this interesting to me, and will no doubt take months if not years to fully come to a satisfactory answer…if it is at all possible in this lifetime, or any other.

    Because I cannot come up with a point by point response I am satisfied with, for all your counter questions, nor do I think that they were meant to be answered overtly, I will only respond to a part that stands out to me. Perhaps from my response, I will reveal more of where I am, and so it would be easier for you to reply, should you choose to do so.

    How can one discern the far more subtle messaging coming from within? Your questions are not invalid. Millions of people have similar questions. But tragically seeking answers is usually unfulfilling.

    Actually, I have found them extremely fulfilling. To me, the search is a delight. When I first started searching, I was promised by the “subtle messaging from within” that I would be shown wonder upon wonder. It has been true to its words.

    First one must find a genuine master — granted, almost impossible — who can demonstrate the means necessary to begin to listen. There can be no proselytizing, no preaching, no joining fees, no membership cards, no special garments, no secret words, no secret handshakes.

    In my journey, I have come to rely on an intuition to guide me. I do not search frenetically, as I trust that “when the student is ready, A teacher will appear”, I hesitate to use such cliches, but it was the most appropriate. It is my understanding that a “teacher” may not necessarily be human. It may not even even be intentional. Random circumstances, a stray thought while showering, all may be teachers. To me, human teachers are never permanent. Each teacher teaches what is relevant to be learned for that particular lesson, then both teacher and student moves on, either in life, or in death.

    In a way, my Intuition is now my current master. What Intuition is, or when it will cease to be my master, I do not know. I have a hunch that it is probably when I understand what Intuition is, or made of. Incidentally, this was the point of my original question to you….I want to understand whom/what is this force that I am guided by. Am I guilty of trying to kill my master…LOL?

    I am already satisfied that in this physical lifetime, it is not even necessary or useful for me to ask this question. But I did so out of curiosity.

    Now my masters are dead. They showed me how to attend to my questions. One must become quiet inside. Very still. Until the wild elephant is tamed. Only an attendant mind can tame the wild elephant. …………..
    A hint: The wild elephant has no interest in being tamed — believe me. Only an awakening master within can begin the task. But first one must find an awakening master without to show the way.

    Thank you for your advice.

    •ï¿½Replies: @werpor
    @littlereddot

    I wrote a response to someone on another thread. It is as good a response as any to embrace your comment in its entirety.

    Here it is:
    werpor said on Unz.com
    June 11, 2024,  500 words

    @anarchyst
    “If jewry is to change and become human, the “good†jews will have to “feel the heatâ€.

    Yes very true. I have Jewish family. Most have no knowledge of Zionist/Jewish history. But how many non-Jews know their histories? People only think they know all kinds of things. Most people now-a-days never question the received. They never question the source of the things they â€know.†Most people get the news from the TV talking heads. They are propagandized.

    Some Jewish people I know well are intelligent professionals. Yet they support Israel no matter what.
    They may have growing doubts about the present regime in Israel, however they have no doubts about their Jewish inheritance as a precious inheritance. They seem impervious to feeling the heat. For them being Jewish is more than important. This is their identity.

    Being identified — not matter with what religion, or what political party, or with one’s own opinions, or with a sports team is a kind of madness. Shedding one’s identifications is a pursuit only done intentionally and with resolve. Our identifications have us rather than that we have them.

    When I was a young man in the 1960s some men would claim that they were Ford guys or Chevy guys.

    Even after discovering management planned for their cars obsolescence and they experienced a breakdown some men took pride in being able to repair them themselves. Even when a politician lets them down over and over again many people claim themselves to be Democrats no matter what — or Republicans no matter what.

    Same for Jews. No matter how badly treated Jews treat Jews they just shrug. No matter how badly Jews treat a Goy its OK — because…

    Jews are the most identified with their affiliation as though they were born Jews rather than brainwashed. Same for some sports fans — the Toronto Maple Leafs have not won a Stanley Cup since 1967. Yet it is apparently impossible to buy a ticket. You’d think the fans would get tired of paying to watch losers. The same is true for some of the NFL teams — but once a Minnesota Viking always a Minnesota Viking.

    Why? Because without an identification they would cease to exist! Of course, one only truly exists without identifications. Spend any time with Jews you’ll discover that almost all they talk about is being Jewish. Their jokes are about being Jewish or not being Jewish. Their politics revolve around being Jewish. They look forward intently to celebrating as Jews. Jewish holidays. Friday Shabbat. And another dozen or so Jewish holidays.

    If you are Jewish it is almost impossible to free yourself from the Jewish spell. To be identified with something is to be under a spell. It is like being seduced.

    The principal aim of seduction is to bring under control. The etymology of the word seductor from Latin is sēdūcŠis “lead astray†— how about that. To be identified is to have been lead astray.
    Jews are tempered by “heat†— they love their suffering.

    Oddly one of the first things one is taught when one seeks enlightenment under a master is the importance of giving up one’s suffering.

    In the way of an addendum:

    Quoting you.

    “I am already satisfied that in this physical lifetime, it is not even necessary or useful for me to ask this question. But I did so out of curiosity.â€

    Is this really true?

    In Japanese Buddhism *satori* is a first step. Think here something much like satisfaction but not quite.

    Ch’an expressions refers to enlightenment — most certainly not identification — as “seeing *your* self- natureâ€. But even this is not enough. After seeing your self-nature, you need to deepen your experience even further and bring it into maturation. You should have enlightenment experiences again and again and support them with continuous practice. Even though Ch’an says that at the time of enlightenment, your outlook is the same as Buddha you are not full Buddha.

    One may be satisfied, however “seeing into one’s true nature†or “essence†is a practice of long self observation. Which requires the development of both seeing outward and at the same time seeing within. This is a self observer not a critique of self. Just simply seeing one’s self as one is.

    Hint:
    When one truly sees — usually in a situation where one is identified — it is like a curtain raising *momentarily* — accompanied by a hit to one’s emotions — felt in the solar plexus. The ego is on guard though. The “ego†does not want to be seen. The “ego†is not you, though it is commonly taken as “Iâ€â€¦

    Satisfaction may very well be acquiescence. Outside, everything rosy — inside restless. Buddhist’s commonly meditate cultivating an inner silence — better of course, to see one’s self as one truly is — in moments when someone is stepping on your corns. Where then is this “satisfaction?â€

    Replies: @littlereddot, @Anonymous
  • @Notsofast
    @question

    this is the traditional way of dealing with inflation, volker put the u.s. rate to 20% at one time. they are playing within the "rules", of the western governments (that they themselves no longer follow). this is why the russians want to beat them at their own game, by their own "rules based order", while western economies are devoured by their own ponzinomics after having cut their own throats through illegal sanctions and boycotts. this also allowed them to decouple themselves from the western crazy train, before it crashes into the station.

    they are positioning themselves to replace the western hegemon, that usurps the national wealth of their vassal states and prevents the development of their economies and people. through the ever growing brics alliance, china and other member states will be able to follow suit and replaced the weaponized u.s. dollar in international trade, kicking the last leg out from under the bloated hegemon.

    look at the size of the national debt since 1980, we went from 900 billion to 35 trillion and counting in four decades. now realize our "federal reserve", is neither. it is 12 privately owned banks, that we can't audit, that give the president a list of 10 candidates of their choosing to appoint as head and we don't even know who owns these banks. they receive 5% of our money they create out of thin air and are incentivized to create debt. this is usery on a national scale.

    russias central bank is owned by the state and their rates will drop after their economy fully recovers, from the illegal sanctions and seizures. their gdp growth this year is 3.2% up from the 2.6% projection in january. germany gdp growth this year is .2%, the u.k. .6%, france .8%, u s. 1.3%. so who winning this economic war they started? they have been totally pants by the russians and look like the fools they are, to the rest of the world.

    most russians own their homes and many have dacha cabins as vacation homes. the price of housing in the u.s. makes homeownership impossible for the average worker, forcing them to be rent slaves and the price of an "affordable" studio apartment in my area is $2000 a month, while the minimum wage is $12/hr. we live in a rentier ponzi scheme. this is what klaus schwab meant when he told us, we will own nothing and be happy 😊 ðŸ˜.

    Replies: @question, @question

    Well that’s all so interesting, you probably have interesting views on sound money, the marginalist revolution, supply and demand, cryptos and other things, and how those have smth to do with the American demise?

    •ï¿½Replies: @Notsofast
    @question

    well the biggest elephant in the room, is the ultraponzi scheme of the derivates market, with it's quadrillion dollar exposure.

    this is the real time bomb, because when the shit hits the fan, the chain reation will bring down the whole daisy chain of our potemkin economy that will be imploded. this is more than the sum total of all the world's money supply, it's an unimaginable sum that can never be made good.

    there's only one solution to this that i can see and that's a massive emp, to wipe out all their debt and give them the debt jubilee these crooks need to escape their crimes in "the great reset" they keep telling us about.

    unlike the traditional jubilee, this will only benifit the banksters and the little guy will suffer and once again be left holding the bag.

    Replies: @question
  • Z-man says:
    June 9, 2024 at 10:59 pm GMT •ï¿½100 Words
    @Dr. Rock
    @36 ulster

    Here it is, give it a read-

    https://www.unz.com/ejones/antony-blinken-is-a-holocaust-liar/

    Replies: @Z-man

    Thanks.
    It’s a long article by Unz but I got the gist of it from the first section. But, just looking at blinky Blinken it’s intuitive that he’s a contorted liar. He’s been lying thru both sides of his mouth since he took office. He’s also the grandson of a Jew pimp. ‘Nuff said.

  • @36 ulster
    @Dr. Rock

    If the tank crewman was from the 761st Tank Battalion, and if the stepdad was an inmate of the Gunskirchen Camp, there may be some truth to it, but this hasn't yet passed the smell test. In fact, it reeks of the cynical, unrequited "love" between Jews and blacks that riles so many of us. If the tank commander had been an average, ordinary white guy, what kind of poignant, feel-good story would that make?

    Replies: @Dr. Rock, @Dr. Rock
    •ï¿½Replies: @Z-man
    @Dr. Rock

    Thanks.
    It's a long article by Unz but I got the gist of it from the first section. But, just looking at blinky Blinken it's intuitive that he's a contorted liar. He's been lying thru both sides of his mouth since he took office. He's also the grandson of a Jew pimp. 'Nuff said.
  • Dr. Rock says:
    June 9, 2024 at 10:07 pm GMT •ï¿½100 Words
    @36 ulster
    @Dr. Rock

    If the tank crewman was from the 761st Tank Battalion, and if the stepdad was an inmate of the Gunskirchen Camp, there may be some truth to it, but this hasn't yet passed the smell test. In fact, it reeks of the cynical, unrequited "love" between Jews and blacks that riles so many of us. If the tank commander had been an average, ordinary white guy, what kind of poignant, feel-good story would that make?

    Replies: @Dr. Rock, @Dr. Rock

    Someone, and it may have been Unz, did a deep dive of this BS story, and proved, almost without doubt, that it couldn’t have happened, at least not the way it was described, using locations units, the dates, etc.

    Also, I believe he said that this same story has been used more than once, by more than one person.

    I don’t need to look past his whirlwind tour of famous camps- I thought these were all death camps, why didn’t the first camp just gas him in the chambers, make some soap and a lampshade, and burn the rest in the nuclear powered crematoriums?

  • Anonymous[166] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:
    June 9, 2024 at 10:07 pm GMT •ï¿½600 Words
    @littlereddot
    @Anonymous


    Mefoblis was right when he said that politics has to be run by people who are not in it for personal gain. Unfortunately, there aren’t very many such people.
    �
    Yes, Mefobills is a wise man. This selection of the right person/persons as ruler is surely the crucial factor whether any political system runs well or not.

    There are examples of different societies all around the world experimenting to get the formula right for them. I think it is a never ending process because these societies themselves change over time, and the formulas need to change with it.

    The problem with the current attitudes in the US, that people assume that the experimentation and adaptation of their system has ended. In a way, the Constitution that was written 250 years ago, has been turned into an idol, placed onto an altar and worshiped.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    There are examples of different societies all around the world experimenting to get the formula right for them. I think it is a never ending process because these societies themselves change over time, and the formulas need to change with it.

    Definitely agree. Experienced reality is always changing, and we must change with it or die.

    The problem with the current attitudes in the US, that people assume that the experimentation and adaptation of their system has ended. In a way, the Constitution that was written 250 years ago, has been turned into an idol, placed onto an altar and worshiped.

    Definitely disagree with your metaphor. The US is made of States, and each State is different in population and resources ( https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2014/07/03/where-do-borders-need-to-be-redrawn/nine-nations-of-north-america-30-years-later ). Some of the States do do not live according to the US Constitution, and they (of course) believe it should be amended, possibly through “esoteric reading” (which originally meant changing the definitions of words within a small group, thus changing the interpretation of legal, political, or religious passages. “Pilpul” uses esoteric reading, so did the “emanations of the shadow of a penumbra” in a famous legal case, so does “Our Democracy”. Opposite of “esoteric” is “exoteric”, the reading of that same word by those outside the small group.

    Texas prefers the US Constitution as read exoterically. Texas has the legal right to withdraw from the Union, https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/CN/htm/CN.1.htm#:~:text=Sec.,unimpaired%20to%20all%20the%20States.
    and some Texans want to do that:
    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/new-texas-gop-platform-calls-secession-vote-resistance-federal-infringements

    Opinions in the US vary.

    New York, by contrast, believes that the esoteric reading of the US Constitution better comports with their way of life. New York wants the current system (called “Our Democracy”) to continue.

    Note that there is an amendment provision in the US Constitution, most recently used in 1992 to increase Congressional pay (of course). However, Congress and Senate have not otherwise used that provision since 1992.

    In short, the US elite is changing the US system, but hiding that change from the US public, which is effectively powerless (and formally so if elections are fraudulent and not subject to auditing or review).

    The Code of Hammurabi (https://www.history.com/topics/ancient-middle-east/hammurabi) is the first codification of law known, about 3.8 kilo years ago. Since then, Western countries have tried to have a written law, the demos for protection from the king, and the king to secure the loyalty and minimize the looting of the demos. (The UK went with “common law” based on precedent and administered by judges and lawyers.)

    The US no longer has such a written law. First, there is too much law; nobody could read it in a lifetime. Second, the law is vague. Supposedly the average US citizen violates several Federal statutes a day. Finally, as the Trump case and the 1/6 cases and the US border cases and the Hillary e-mail server case show, the law is applied selectively and politically *.

    The people who want the Constitution read and enforced exoterically simply want a written law that they can actually obey. Other people prefer the current system.

    Granted that this is a bit different from Confucian government.
    —————————————————————————
    * and is self contradictory. If genetics is not determined by genetics, but rather socially determined, how can Trans people be “trapped in the wrong body”? Law is being used for political dominance games. Example: Remember how dominant Feminists became outcast TERFS?

    •ï¿½Replies: @Anonymous
    @Anonymous

    Sorry, typo.
    " If genetics is not determined by genetics, but rather socially determined, how can Trans people be “trapped in the wrong body�" should read
    " If sexual identity is not determined by genetics, but rather socially determined, how can Trans people be “trapped in the wrong body?"
  • Anonymous[271] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:
    June 9, 2024 at 9:16 pm GMT •ï¿½700 Words
    @dogbumbreath
    @Anonymous


    Such a diversion of capital to unproductive uses is, of course, not unique to finance capital. Such diversion was responsible for the fall of the USSR and will, I suspect, bring about the fall of the CCP and PRC, most likely within the next decade (by 2034). Finance capital, however, is ideal for concealment of asset stripping in a Western society.
    �
    You are missing the main point in Mefobills post. When the "State" and not "Private" Banks hold the reins to money creation and diversion of capital, the "intentional" boom and bust cycles that syphon capital out of the majority and into Elite pockets is reduced or eliminated.

    The job of "socialist" State Banks is to use Capital to increase productivity and raise the living standards of it's population. If the Government is incompetent, then you have failure (i.e. USSR). The CPC has proven since it's founding that it's process of selecting it's leaders (government) is the exact opposite. In 1949 (CPC founding), China's economy was in the bottom quarter of World GDP; near the bottom to be exact after a Century plus of Colonial looting and Civil War. Since 2016, it's been #1 (by GDP PPP). Even if you are skeptical of statistics (which you should be), the facts on the ground back up China's impressive road to the top:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbywNxdtoe0

    Replies: @Anonymous

    You are missing the main point in Mefobills post. When the “State†and not “Private†Banks hold the reins to money creation and diversion of capital, the “intentional†boom and bust cycles that syphon capital out of the majority and into Elite pockets is reduced or eliminated.

    Please read this: https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/economics/kondratieff-wave/ \

    Note that the “6th K-cycle” did not start as anticipated — we got the COVID fraud instead. That implies that, rather than the K-wave causing the new “technology”, the new “technology” causes the K-wave. That is, K-waves are not examples of Marxist exploitation, but rather of investment decisions and considerable hard work in science and engineering, which result in new human capabilities and return of capital to investors.

    Here are the details of the most recent successful “K-wave”:

    The “computer revolution” depended in 1946 ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_transistor ) research in solid state physics, research that included fabrication of the first transistor. It took until 1960, 14 years, from that to the first integrated chip ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invention_of_the_integrated_circuit ), and 1971 to develop the first integrated chip computer, the 4004, with a word size of 4 bits ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_4004 ).

    Moore’s law for processor speed failed shortly in about the year 2016,
    , 70 years after fabrication of the first transistor.

    and the Moore’s law for transistors/die failed by 2016 ( https://cap.csail.mit.edu/death-moores-law-what-it-means-and-what-might-fill-gap-going-forward ), 45 years after the Intel 4004 release.

    That’s at least 24 years of development followed by 45 years of a growing niche for profitable computer applications.

    That’s 2016-1946 = 70 years from start to finish. From the 4004 in 1960 to 2016 is 45 years. Gee, the K cycle is about the 40-70 year length of an historic K cycle. . . What a coincidence!

    Investment is not easy; at best it is probabilistic. Investment in a brand new technology (such as canals in the early 1800s, or railroads in the mid 1800s) depends on a long interval of underfunded development followed by a period of early investors who are successful gamblers, a middle period of period of successful investors in profitable applications, and a late period of broke investors who try to apply the technology where it is not profitable, justifying it on the grounds that “Investments in x have always been moneymakers”.

    Government is, historically, very bad at investing. In raw fact, government helped the corporations shut down the industrial labs from which came the first transistors. The corporations shut down the industrial labs because, to be blunt, its executives were too stupid to see commercial possibilities, and the success of spin-offs made them look bad. They also didn’t like a “disruptive technology” that would, well, disrupt them. No new science, no new engineering. Government propaganda about the evils of competition and “creative destruction” didn’t help, nor did changes in tort law, nor, later, did shipping US industry overseas.

    Summary: Government is not better at managing K-waves than anybody else. Government has shut down K-waves by shutting down industrial labs. No new science, no new K waves. Note that the science of medical revolutions dates back to the discovery of DNA’s function & structure, 1953, but that it was never developed into the sort of useful medical techniques that could cause a K-wave. Instead, we got a fraudulent K-wave, with debilitating or deadly RNA vaccines and government discouragement of “racist” DNA measurement to predict individual reactions to medical drugs.

    So, yes, government management does eliminate the “boom and bust cycles”, but at the cost of a stagnant pool of industrial techniques that require progressively depleted inputs and reduce the “have nots” to “have even less”. Instead of “boom and bust” cycles that introduce new production or distribution methods, one gets a steady downturn followed by a sudden large downturn — which the world is now.

    China thought it would forever have an effective monopoly on cheap labor, much as the US elite thought it would forever own Europe and loot Russia. Wrong.

    And your counter-argument is that “government knows best”. Just as it did for COVID, Desert Storm, open borders . . .

    •ï¿½Replies: @dogbumbreath
    @Anonymous

    You main problem is your rigid thinking; Government can only be BAD. This is true when Oligarchy (Wealthy Capitalists) are the actual string pullers. There is such a thing as a Sovereign Government (not being controlled by an Oligarchy) and such Governments are NOT BAD if the right leadership is selected. Socialist China is a present day example.

    Please read this: https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/economics/kondratieff-wave
    �
    Kontratieff published his theory in 1925 as his analysis was based on agriculture in the 19th Century. No one needs another theory to explain Natures cyclical cycles. What people need is an accurate account of how the "Oligarchy (Empire)" shapes economic cycles with events in the 20th Century such as WW1, great depression, WW2, Korean War, Vietnam War, Petro Dollar, Uni-Polar financial System, Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, Syrian Wars etc. There is always an "invisible oligarchic hand" that creates boom and bust cycles to syphon wealth to the Oligarchy. The 20th and early 21st Century is simply a continuation of Imperialism and Colonialism from the 16th Century.

    Note that the “6th K-cycle†did not start as anticipated — we got the COVID fraud instead. That implies that, rather than the K-wave causing the new “technologyâ€, the new “technology†causes the K-wave.
    �
    You are misinformed. The Covid fraud was an intentional event by the Oligarchy to continue the substantial fraud in the healthcare and pharmaceutical industries and NOT to prevent any 6th wave theory. The seeds of the so called 6th K-Cycle (wave) already began way back in 1881 when the Oligarchs (i.e Rockefeller Medicine) invented Germ Theory. ALL plan-demics are a result of malnutrition, poor human lifestyle choices, incorrect healthcare interventions and toxins (man-made drugs). The only correct point you make is Covid was a fraud because there is no such thing as a virus. This is a "germ theory" hoax:

    https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/the-truth-about-viruses:a

    The Covid scam was another "invisible oligarch hand" exercise by the Uni-polar Empire. Some intentions were to keep countries and continents controlled and dependent via more debt (i.e. selling medical aid like vaccines). To inject money into a bankrupt Western financial system without public pushback because money used for scam-demic purposes is unaccounted. To prevent and hopefully destroy competing economies (i.e. China) from challenging the Uni-polar Empire. The Ukraine and Gaza wars are events following the scam-demic for the same reasons.

    And your counter-argument is that “government knows bestâ€. Just as it did for COVID, Desert Storm, open borders . . .
    �
    I said "Good government" knows best, not ALL governments. Notice how China invented it's own supply of vaccines for it's populations and other good governments wanting to avoid the Western debt trap. As for open borders, this is a result of "bad government" controlled by the Oligarchy. Isn't this obvious?

    Replies: @Anonymous
  • Notsofast says:
    June 9, 2024 at 9:15 pm GMT •ï¿½400 Words
    @question
    @Notsofast

    No doubt you have calculated the massive import substitution effect from sanctions, as has been widely publicised. The NATO block scored an own goal. What was the reduction in RF national debt from that?


    And for additional colour, the RF CB has maintained tight money policy at 16%, with commercial mortgage rates now in the >20% region. Usually that is called usury.

    https://tradingeconomics.com/russia/interest-rate

    Replies: @question, @Notsofast

    this is the traditional way of dealing with inflation, volker put the u.s. rate to 20% at one time. they are playing within the “rules”, of the western governments (that they themselves no longer follow). this is why the russians want to beat them at their own game, by their own “rules based order”, while western economies are devoured by their own ponzinomics after having cut their own throats through illegal sanctions and boycotts. this also allowed them to decouple themselves from the western crazy train, before it crashes into the station.

    they are positioning themselves to replace the western hegemon, that usurps the national wealth of their vassal states and prevents the development of their economies and people. through the ever growing brics alliance, china and other member states will be able to follow suit and replaced the weaponized u.s. dollar in international trade, kicking the last leg out from under the bloated hegemon.

    look at the size of the national debt since 1980, we went from 900 billion to 35 trillion and counting in four decades. now realize our “federal reserve”, is neither. it is 12 privately owned banks, that we can’t audit, that give the president a list of 10 candidates of their choosing to appoint as head and we don’t even know who owns these banks. they receive 5% of our money they create out of thin air and are incentivized to create debt. this is usery on a national scale.

    russias central bank is owned by the state and their rates will drop after their economy fully recovers, from the illegal sanctions and seizures. their gdp growth this year is 3.2% up from the 2.6% projection in january. germany gdp growth this year is .2%, the u.k. .6%, france .8%, u s. 1.3%. so who winning this economic war they started? they have been totally pants by the russians and look like the fools they are, to the rest of the world.

    most russians own their homes and many have dacha cabins as vacation homes. the price of housing in the u.s. makes homeownership impossible for the average worker, forcing them to be rent slaves and the price of an “affordable” studio apartment in my area is $2000 a month, while the minimum wage is $12/hr. we live in a rentier ponzi scheme. this is what klaus schwab meant when he told us, we will own nothing and be happy 😊 ðŸ˜.

    •ï¿½Replies: @question
    @Notsofast

    Well that's all so interesting, you probably have interesting views on sound money, the marginalist revolution, supply and demand, cryptos and other things, and how those have smth to do with the American demise?

    Replies: @Notsofast
    , @question
    @Notsofast

    The most important example of dealing with inflation in the history of the American economy was not the Volker shock.

    What was it and how was it handled?
  • Anon[238] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:
    @IronForge
    Tough Times.

    Ritter has been vulnerable and susceptible to Govt Foul Play.

    *He was an Intel Dweeb for the General Staff in Desert Storm - access to Classified Matl, as well as susceptible to Bad Intel Feeds;

    *He worked with MI6 and the Mossad - which makes him susceptible to Bad Intel Feeds;

    *He's a Convicted Felon who served Time in Prison for Pedo Offenses. The DoJ and State Govt(TN?) that Prosecuted and Incarcerated him pwn him. Possible Real/False Charges may be disclosed for Prosecution. That's his own undoing. I'm presuming that RT didn't vet him properly before getting him on the Air.

    If he dug up good Intel, he'd be credible; but he's an Intel Dweeb - a News Journalist/Presenter for the General Staff. No actual Combat Unit Assignment nor deployment in one taking part in an Active War Zone (Yours Truly has).

    It showed when he started hyping up and clutched his pearls when he relayed news of the West smuggling in Howitzers as "Game Changers". Overhyped; and Vets who had some competence already knew that Nooohh-Body outguns Russians in Field Artillery.

    We took that apart on another Blog.

    He's now a DoomPr0n YouTuber. Events+Trends over Ukraine aren't groundbreaking save for NATO Weapons Controversies; and the Israel-Hamas Conflict has taken his viewership away.

    I myself have been interviewed by the FBI before 2014 and attempts were made by Agents to convince me not to get involved in Investment/Business/R&D Projects in Russia - probably tipped from Neighborhood Hackers(including nosy as f@ck Mormons, JWs, Scientology, Moonies, and other Cult Retards) Corporate Espionage, Navy Whistleblower Retaliators who copied my IT Work and Stalked my VC/R&D Proposal attempts - to copy/sell/steal for Profit - since year 2000.

    Masons, Mormons, JWs, Scientology, Moonies, and other Cult F@cks are still at it Today with my business - they've called it "Civil Disobedience"/Patriotism/Christian Intervention/Mormon Tough Live-Psychology/ESP Research/Negro advancement/forced social isolation and attempted Cult+Black Socialization+Proselytization attempts(obviously blatant in Orange County CA, where Black Residents are relatively rare)... Usual Desperate+Dire Cult Stalker Shitshow - pretty much condoned by 3rd Party Observers as the Dirty Work to prevent the Earnest+Intelligent from GTFO of the sinking economy+Infrastructure of California.

    Sad part is, many a Cult Monkey are working their ware through Federal/State/County Agency Employees.

    This Murica aren't the Land of the Free.

    See you guys around on these blog sites.

    Hopefully I'll make it abroad this year...

    Replies: @one nobody, @Che Guava, @anon, @CelestiaQuesta, @Anon

    Get a life

  • Anon[238] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:
    @Michael Korn
    Scott should get the Russian embassy to smuggle him out of the country and move in with Snowden. This country is incapable of reform.

    Replies: @Anon

    Yes, the two filthy traitors deserve each other. May they end up in a freezing gulag

  • Anon[328] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:
    @Harold Smith
    @Anon


    Scott Ritter is a twice-convicted sex predator who licks Putin s blood-soaked boots. Recently, felon Ritter traveled to cheynya where he gave a pep talk to Chechnyas armed forces. He’s a sicko and a traitor
    �
    But here's the thing: The fact that you Satanic judenfilth hate him so much is the best compliment he could ever get. Having earned the hatred of the jewish collective, he's absolved of everything. Now you better run along and get back to licking Netanyahu's blood-soaked boots.

    Replies: @Anon

    Who says I’m a jew? Moron

    •ï¿½Replies: @Harold Smith
    @Anon


    Who says I’m a jew? Moron
    �
    You do, goofball.
  • @Emslander
    @Notsofast

    I suspect you are a failed garage mechanic to whom punctuation and grammar are barriers to advancement, but you have the satisfaction on Unz of being able to insult pictures of your generic enemies that exist only in your mind. That's a better motive than ignorance, but no dichotomy is necessary.

    Replies: @Notsofast

    oh yeah, well i suspect your a retired schoolmarm, that misses the days when she could abuse her students, and make them write, the 10 rules of capitalization, one hundred times on the blackboard, after school.

    nailed it, didn’t i?

  • werpor says:
    June 9, 2024 at 3:42 pm GMT •ï¿½1,100 Words
    @littlereddot
    @werpor


    mind, the body, and the emotions
    �
    These are excellent points you bring up.

    In our prevailing consensus, we like to think that the body is controlled by the emotions, and the emotions are in turn controlled by the mind, being at the top of the pyramid...although IMHO in reality, they all influence each other.

    But my sense is that there is more beyond the three. There is something else that motivates the mind to do what it does. I struggle to put a name to it. Shall I call it Conscience? or Inspiration? or our Higher Selves (though this term is too nebulous to be useful).

    What are your thoughts on these?

    Replies: @Poupon Marx, @werpor

    “In our prevailing consensus, we like to think that the body is controlled by the emotions, and the emotions are in turn controlled by the mind, being at the top of the pyramid…although IMHO in reality, they all influence each other.â€

    A master would ask you some questions. Is there a “prevailing consensus.†This ‘we’ you refer to is whom?

    You write “…they all influence each other.†True, the three — the body, the mind, and the emotions “all influence each other†but what good is that? Willy nilly — the mind, the body, the emotions influencing each other — but, is there a master in the house? There are, as you describe it three tyrants — each of the three clamouring for attention — but no master providing it!

    You write “…controlled by the mind.†What mind? Are our thoughts “…the mind? Perhaps a more precise language is necessary here?

    Mind is a potential. Do not conflate thinking with the mind. It is a weird idea when first presented that the fact is we seldom think — our thinking is our programming — our programming thinks us!

    Our bodies have a purpose but again there is no master in the house. Our bodies demand our attention — attend to its demands — I want chocolate, I want sex, I want sleep, I want love, I want a vacation, I want money, etc. and on and on and on — this “I†is not the real I.

    Sometimes the body is interrupted and the emotions intrude. The “I†one uses when one says I am hungry gets upset when the other “I’s†clamouring to be attended intrude. Feelings of frustration are not real feelings — those “feelings’ are merely a reaction. They may use the energy of real emotions but they are reaction.

    Most so called thinking is just the vocal expression of reconciliation. Out of your mouth comes something like — I think we should have pizza for a change. Many so called thoughts are thoughts we are barely conscious of having us. One experiences the outcome rather than being the result of deliberate thinking.

    Allow me to set that up: You are invited to a party, say. One you are not keen on attending. A friend says “…she will be there.†Next thing you recall you are home after the party. You hang up your expensive new leather jacket. You see a pile of mail on the table with the logo of your credit card provider in the corners of the envelope. Suddenly you need a drink. You reach for the bottle of wine in the refrigerator and there is barely a thimble of wine left in the bottle. “Damn it!†You slam the fridge and the note to yourself stuck to the fridge door reminding you of an early morning appointment flutters onto the floor. “Double damn it!†On the way to your bedroom you see the sleeve of your new leather jacket as you brush by the closet. …Which freshens up the memory of the party.

    “Shit†you exclaim, “…she wasn’t even at the bloody party.†Next morning you get up early. You are still peeved, but noticing the newspaper on the way out the door you read the headline. Your company just announced a huge sale of their product, providing generators for a new dam — a contract you didn’t expect would happen. Suddenly you feel elated. Smiling, you begin thinking about a new car …

    And so it goes — your life, that is.

    Were *your* emotions controlled by *your* mind? Or were *your* emotions completely controlled by externalities? In fact there is no master in *your* house whatsoever — is there? The mind was barely observing its reality. It has never developed. The mind has enormous potential. But we are merely automatons. Our attention is frittered away on externalities. We conform because it’s comforting.

    However, before the mind can be trained, there must a trickle of something which intrudes emanating from the mind hinting at its neglect. An attendant question is what am I? Most ignore the trickle. We allow that mind — the higher mind — and the attendant question to be at best denigrated and at worst mocked. Not often mocked directly but indirectly, by the constant demands of our modern spokespersons; politicians, ideologues, advertisers, media babblers, teachers within the educational system, and not least the blathering nonsense of mass religiosity — all clamouring to be heard.

    How can one discern the far more subtle messaging coming from within? Your questions are not invalid. Millions of people have similar questions. But tragically seeking answers is usually unfulfilling. An ordinary group of people endlessly debate the meaning of life. The answer cannot be found among the equally confused.

    First one must find a genuine master — granted, almost impossible — who can demonstrate the means necessary to begin to listen. There can be no proselytizing, no preaching, no joining fees, no membership cards, no special garments, no secret words, no secret handshakes.

    First you must have a host of questions which you constantly strive to have answered. Unlike most people who only have answers, sincere questions attract. Sincere questions are something similar to magnetism. Of course this searching can only be done sincerely. Most men live lives fulfilling an ordinary destiny. However exalted or lowly as manifested every day by hundreds of millions they are like the billions of seeds falling on the ground in a forest. Only a very few successfully seed a new generative body.

    This is an ancient message. Most often the messengers are killed. While sometimes their messages are appropriated by power possessing people which they use for their own ends. This is a tower of babble.

    Incidentally, I seek no followers. I belong to no groups. I have no published books or pamphlets. I was fortunate in my life. I never stopped asking questions. I have read thousands of books and burned the candles well into the early mornings. That was then.

    Now my masters are dead. They showed me how to attend to my questions. One must become quiet inside. Very still. Until the wild elephant is tamed. Only an attendant mind can tame the wild elephant.

    It is doubtful you will find support among your friends, family, neighbours, community. Search but keep it to yourself. One day you may discover how alone is the searcher. Never proselytize. Your message will fall on ears that cannot hear.

    A hint: The wild elephant has no interest in being tamed — believe me. Only an awakening master within can begin the task. But first one must find an awakening master without to show the way.

    •ï¿½Thanks: Odd Rabbit, 1jonny
    •ï¿½Replies: @littlereddot
    @werpor

    I believe this is our first interaction, so I appreciate that you have taken the time to reply so thoughtfully with an unknown quantity, myself. You have written much this interesting to me, and will no doubt take months if not years to fully come to a satisfactory answer...if it is at all possible in this lifetime, or any other.

    Because I cannot come up with a point by point response I am satisfied with, for all your counter questions, nor do I think that they were meant to be answered overtly, I will only respond to a part that stands out to me. Perhaps from my response, I will reveal more of where I am, and so it would be easier for you to reply, should you choose to do so.

    How can one discern the far more subtle messaging coming from within? Your questions are not invalid. Millions of people have similar questions. But tragically seeking answers is usually unfulfilling.
    �
    Actually, I have found them extremely fulfilling. To me, the search is a delight. When I first started searching, I was promised by the "subtle messaging from within" that I would be shown wonder upon wonder. It has been true to its words.

    First one must find a genuine master — granted, almost impossible — who can demonstrate the means necessary to begin to listen. There can be no proselytizing, no preaching, no joining fees, no membership cards, no special garments, no secret words, no secret handshakes.
    �
    In my journey, I have come to rely on an intuition to guide me. I do not search frenetically, as I trust that "when the student is ready, A teacher will appear", I hesitate to use such cliches, but it was the most appropriate. It is my understanding that a "teacher" may not necessarily be human. It may not even even be intentional. Random circumstances, a stray thought while showering, all may be teachers. To me, human teachers are never permanent. Each teacher teaches what is relevant to be learned for that particular lesson, then both teacher and student moves on, either in life, or in death.

    In a way, my Intuition is now my current master. What Intuition is, or when it will cease to be my master, I do not know. I have a hunch that it is probably when I understand what Intuition is, or made of. Incidentally, this was the point of my original question to you....I want to understand whom/what is this force that I am guided by. Am I guilty of trying to kill my master...LOL?

    I am already satisfied that in this physical lifetime, it is not even necessary or useful for me to ask this question. But I did so out of curiosity.

    Now my masters are dead. They showed me how to attend to my questions. One must become quiet inside. Very still. Until the wild elephant is tamed. Only an attendant mind can tame the wild elephant. ..............
    A hint: The wild elephant has no interest in being tamed — believe me. Only an awakening master within can begin the task. But first one must find an awakening master without to show the way.
    �
    Thank you for your advice.

    Replies: @werpor
    , @Odd Rabbit
    @werpor

    "Our bodies have a purpose but again there is no master in the house. Our bodies demand our attention — attend to its demands — I want chocolate, I want sex, I want sleep, I want love, I want a vacation, I want money, etc. and on and on and on — this “I†is not the real I."

    When there is no real Self the body//the genes// are the masters of the house and we behave as their slaves. The 'gene-parlament' is the boss, not the 'neuro-parlament'/mind or our self.
    Excerpt from the link:
    ---[...The conscious ‘rational brain’, centred in the pre- frontal cortex, begins to fire up some 500 milliseconds later— after the board of genetic directors in the basement have had time to assess the incoming data for any concealed threats to their security and survival. If threats are implicit in the data, the parliament of genes overwhelms the rational brain with a flood of emotion and issues a set of directives for well-proven genetic behaviour.
    So emotion is the flag of genetic behaviour and sig- nals that the rational brain has been bypassed in the interest of long-term genetic survival. If our Amygdala has been triggered, we react ‘instinctively’ with anger, lust or fear. If not, then we think and act ‘morally’—out of love, duty, or a sense of justice and compassion. Meanwhile the brain’s propaganda department patches together a reasoned explanation for that behaviour in order to maintain a reassuring facade of rational ‘free will’. ®]--
    http://www.zo.utexas.edu/courses/THOC/enigma_code.pdf
    , @Poupon Marx
    @werpor


    Now my masters are dead. They showed me how to attend to my questions. One must become quiet inside.
    �
    Fear not. I am here. At you service.
  • @1jonny
    @anarchyst


    A question for you…
    Would you say the same about cancer cells that have taken over a human body?
    In order to beat the takeover of cancer cells, the only solution is to eliminate them all.
    Harsh?
    Yes, but necessary.
    The JEWS are in the process of killing off gentiles as we speak. Jews are singling out ALL gentiles for eventual elimination.
    It is the JEWS who act as parasites, taking over country-after-country, eventually destroying the “hostâ€.
    The jewish cancer has metastasized and must be dealt with in the only way possible.
    The survival of ALL of humanity is at stake.
    I realize that there are “good†jews out there, but there aren’t enough of them to stop the destruction that jews are wreaking on humanity.
    �
    You say they are as useless and harmful as cancer. I disagree. I agree that they have more influence in western society than I'd like, maybe by quite a bit. I'm Christian and they're not, maybe be said to be anti-Christian to some degree.

    I've known a number of Jews. None were as bad of people as you describe. In fact, they've all been perfectly decent people. I'm not close to being ready to kill them all off, can't go along with that. I don't think it's come down to us OR them. Coexisting together for a couple of millenium, it didn't before this.

    Replies: @Munga Bulga

    The amerimutt “christian”, folks. It is good. The JewSA needs to implode and go to the septic tank of history. Johnny boy here is the proof why that is inevitable. Start preparing your celebration.

  • NotAnonymousHere [AKA "Anogomous"] says:
    June 9, 2024 at 2:53 pm GMT •ï¿½100 Words
    @Brad Anbro
    @THE Germar Rudolf

    You need to take your snide remarks and shove them where the sun doesn't shine, including your use of swear words.

    In case you are not aware of it, this is 2024 and NOT 1968, when I learned how to drive; when roads, for the most part, were in excellent shape and where driving courtesy was the norm and there was no such thing as "road rage."

    During the fall of 2019, I spent three weeks in Sweden, visiting my distant relatives and also many of the amateur radio (ham radio) operators that I had contacted over the years. The person with whom I was staying took me all over south central and southeast Sweden. At no time did I ever witness "road rage" or any driving that was not courteous. We were never "tailgated" once, nor did anyone ever pull out in front of us - they drove like drivers here in the USA used to drive in the 1960s.

    I distinctly remember that in the next few days after September 11, 2001, people here began to drive much more courteously, because they realized how precious life was. But that kind of behavior only lasted a few days and after that, they were back to their "Me First" driving habits.

    Wake up and see things as how they really are here. And take a good, long look in the mirror, while you're at it!

    Replies: @NotAnonymousHere, @THE Germar Rudolf

    “Wake up and see things as how they really are here. And take a good, long look in the mirror, while you’re at it!”

    Preferably while driving. And I say that as the descendant of Holocaust survivors. Aren’t we all survivors or descendants of survivors?

    With anti-semitism becoming the new cool thing in NYC schools, why is no one pointing out that the current administration is driving the country toward Nazism?

    •ï¿½Disagree: HdC
    •ï¿½Replies: @THE Germar Rudolf
    @NotAnonymousHere

    Hitler was right, and the good guy. The Goyim Know, stupid. Whitey is mighty, and waking up en masse by the day.

    There is no such thing as "anti-Semitism"... "It's just a trick we Jews use (to control the narrative and peoples' minds)" - Israeli Foreign Minister in an interview.

    100% of Palestinians are Semitic peoples.

    Yet less than 10% of modern day Jews are of true Semitic origin...

    90%+ are of Eastern European origin (hence why they look White and mostly spoke their European nations languages or the Germanic language Yiddish until after WWII) and have ZERO historical ties to anything Semitic, other than the Hebrew language the converted Whites started using when their Palestinian settler colonialist project ramped up.

    Read it and weep soy boy:

    justice4germans DOT wordpress DOT com
  • As to the US Constitution, it’s waved around like the US flag to give the impression it still has power and force, when in reality it became a meaningless document when Lee surrendered his army at Appomattox Court House on April 9, 1865..

    Which was the real reason and purpose behind the war.

  • Anonymous[620] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:
    June 9, 2024 at 1:53 pm GMT •ï¿½1,400 Words
    @Poupon Marx
    @Anonymous

    Well expressed, lucid cause and effect, without categorical, finite, abstract jargon, and academic labeling mania and escape.

    In the 1950s and early 60s, I experienced life in a segregated city, San Antonio, where Whites lived in one side, Mexicans and Blacks lived in their own sections. Crime was very low in the White world, people trusted strangers; kids would be let out to play without restriction ("Be home by supper").

    Food was very cheap, as was the cost of living. My father was a senior NCO in the Army. We had two cars, a suburban brick home, and ate steak and other unrestricted items from the supermarket. They even had a refrigerator out in the garage. Later, my mother took a government job as patient coordinator liaison between hospital and the world extant.

    My parents were able to save. Schools were excellent. All of this was before, any social media, continuous wars, unionization of teachers, and a lunatic, Bolshevik Communist Democratic Party. We took vacations around the country.

    I had concluded some time ago, when my interest in Russia grew geometrically, that the 1950s character of the America I knew is most closely related to the Russia of today. I find that nobody I can recall having mentioned or spoken, broached the topic of cross-cultural comparison, to be rather astounding and bizarre.

    "Thinking is the best way to travel". People travel less and less today, except to surrogate modern virtual circuses. Carnival Cruise lines has Negroes slugging it out frequently

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHVu-6VwS7Y

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cj4_LLiBl7o

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6pPYP9pg33c

    Replies: @Richard B, @Anonymous

    First, thanks for your assessment of my approach. I try very hard to maintain that approach, partly because I’m an OR type, and partially because nothing else has produced survivable results in my professional life.

    [MORE]

    I had a childhood very similar to yours. I could bike and bus all over the city we lived near, and into the surrounding countryside as well. The contrast to today could hardly be stronger. Even in the 1980s my children could not ride a bike from home to elementary school without being stopped “for their own safety” by random pedestrians, and the school itself was a horror show maintained by the teacher. The “free range” produced much healthier children.

    The politics was different. Back then (1950-1962), the New Deal was still loudly claiming to be an improved version of the Progressives, encouraging progress and innovation by NSF funding and the like, but with stipends for displaced workers. The US Federal government didn’t really start their current “Progress is destroying the Earth unless we can destroy Progress” bit until the 1970s, although you could see early hints of that theme in the anti-Vietnam War propaganda. The Northeast was failing in that its factories and rails had never recovered from lack of maintenance and upgrades during WW II, but the cities were still sort of self supporting and retained an afterglow of the 1920s-1930s intellectual revolution. The New Deal had killed industry and intellect, but nobody knew it yet. Remember, US infighting among ethnic groups after WW II didn’t end until ~1970, and each group claimed to be a vast improvement over anything previous to themselves (e.g. “New Frontier” and “racial equality” in addition to “prosperity through progress”).

    The basic problem with US politics is this: The party that wins elections is the party that can assemble a least cost coalition. Coalitions consist of (a) the general publics, (b) interest groups that are paid by favorable legislation, sometimes involving direct basic income, sometimes from Federal purchases of their products. The winning strategy is to (1) confuse the general public, thus splitting its vote into two self canceling parts, and (2) promise favorable legislation to the lowest cost group that can be organized. This system has failed when (a) public opinion could not be split (e.g. slavery, 1850s) and (b) product vendors were refused favorable legislation (e.g. blocking the Transcontinental Railroad, also 1850s). In the short run, the vendors and the poorest (including immigrants) get what they consider to be favorable treatment (even it it destroys them long-term), and the rest of the country gets destroyed. We are seeing an extreme case of that today (2024).

    This has been the case since Jacksonian Democracy became dominant in the 1820s and greatly reduced the influence of the upper middle class. That was only about 4 decades after the US Constitution became effective. Variants of Jacksonian Democracy lasted until the post-Mexican War (1846-1848) interval, when the acquisition of very large new territory diverged the interests of the US above the Mason-Dixon line from those of the South. It proved possible to influence public opinion in the North so that it opposed slavery, and to use this to destroy the previous façade of national unity in the Democratic party. We are seeing something similar today (2024), in the fracturing of POC support for the Democratic Party.

    Comparison, US and Russia

    There are two instances I remember encountering that compare the US and Russia using the terms you and I are using. One is at the end of Tocqueville’s (T) Democracy in America , https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/815/pg815-images.html . T seems to have reached conclusions very similar to yours. The other was the presidency of New Deal FDR.

    Since you are interested in the topic and it is important, here are some reflections on it, starting with a review of what I know of the literature:

    There are, at the present time, two great nations in the world which seem to tend towards the same end, although they started from different points: I allude to the Russians and the Americans. Both of them have grown up unnoticed; and whilst the attention of mankind was directed elsewhere, they have suddenly assumed a most prominent place amongst the nations; and the world learned their existence and their greatness at almost the same time.

    All other nations seem to have nearly reached their natural limits, and only to be charged with the maintenance of their power; but these are still in the act of growth; *r all the others are stopped, or continue to advance with extreme difficulty; these are proceeding with ease and with celerity along a path to which the human eye can assign no term. The American struggles against the natural obstacles which oppose him; the adversaries of the Russian are men; the former combats the wilderness and savage life; the latter, civilization with all its weapons and its arts: the conquests of the one are therefore gained by the ploughshare; those of the other by the sword. The Anglo-American relies upon personal interest to accomplish his ends, and gives free scope to the unguided exertions and common-sense of the citizens; the Russian centres all the authority of society in a single arm: the principal instrument of the former is freedom; of the latter servitude. Their starting-point is different, and their courses are not the same; yet each of them seems to be marked out by the will of Heaven to sway the destinies of half the globe.

    https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/815/pg815-images.html

    T, of course, was considering evolution, future history, and used an early 19th Century intellectual framework, and answered a 19th Century question: “Who wins?” His answer seemed to be “Both”, or maybe “Both, then one loses.” The important thing here is that T considered both the US and Russia to have room to expand. Note that he did not say the same thing about to obvious candidates: Argentina or Brazil.

    The second was FDR, the New Deal President. He believed that the US and the USSR economic systems were converging, and spent a good part of WW II using US resources to protect USSR interests, which is why the USSR occupied and kept about the same territory at the end of WW II that Stalin was promised by the Third Reich in 1936. FDR, however, was primarily thinking economic systems and population control and birthing a new world in which the sole surviving economic system would be the command economy, as the US and USSR spheres of influence “converged”. (Stalin did not agree with FDR on that.)

    So the US survived WW II and was prosperous during the 1950s and early 1960s. I had a childhood much like yours, same sort of city, I could ride my bike wherever, take busses wherever, no danger at all. Even Manhattan was safe if you stayed in the business/entertainment area. Even back then, however, the Northeast (the “Foundry” https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2014/07/03/where-do-borders-need-to-be-redrawn/nine-nations-of-north-america-30-years-later ) was failing. I spent more time than I like to remember in that region. Northeastern society was reflexively antagonistic to outsiders and, even before containerization and dispersal of industry to rural areas, was economically in serious trouble ( For two Foundry type cases, see: (a)For Manhatten, search for: “West Side Drive Collapse” and the “Monetary Assistance Corporation”, and for the hinterland (b) economic history of Troy, NY: https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2014/07/03/where-do-borders-need-to-be-redrawn/nine-nations-of-north-america-30-years-later , last few paragraphs ). The Northeast back then was sort of like Patrick J. Deneen’s description of the present US elites–lords of the ruins, but pretending the runis were prosperous.

    Of the two, FDR and T, T had a more accurate description. The US and Russia do seem to be converging, although not along FDR’s lines. Both have a demographically endangered population that tenuously holds a resource rich territory that is or has become “multicultural”. Russia has experience with ruling such a domain, the US does not. My guess is that in this next little piece of history the US will undergo the same disintegration as did the USSR, and the historical parallel between the 1932 New Deal and the 1917 will become established ( https://www.zerohedge.com/political/new-texas-gop-platform-calls-secession-vote-resistance-federal-infringements & https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/CN/htm/CN.1.htm#:~:text=Sec.,unimpaired%20to%20all%20the%20States. & https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/88R/billtext/pdf/HB00384I.pdf ). Considering what that implies, and assuming that the US survives, T’s idea of “two halves of the world” may turn out to be correct after all.

  • Rich23 says:
    June 9, 2024 at 11:50 am GMT •ï¿½400 Words
    @MoT
    @Rich23

    Lira was a clown. There is no way in hell he could have been for real. You had a man babbling away, saying things from within the belly of the neo-nazi beast, that got locals routinely killed, and he purportedly gets taken away for questioning and then "released" with a warning. And then, like some sort of suicidal squirrel, he goes right back to doing it again for Christ's sake! Not only that... he supposedly gets out and then announces to the world his intentions and where he plans to escape to! To say it's beyond bizarre is an understatement. Lira is probably somewhere safe living it up and having a big laugh about it with his buds.

    Replies: @Rich23

    Of course Lira was a clown.
    Lira and Ritter deserved each other.
    Yet, go over to Ritter’s Substack and read what Scott wrote about Lira in August 2023.
    Ritter wrote that Substack specifically about Lira while The Ukraine imprisoned him the second time and just a few months before he died. (You’re welcome to argue that fact with the howling wilderness)

    After reading Ritter’s Substack you’d be hard pressed to discern whether the Russians, The Ukrainians, Putin, Zelensky, the SBU, Lira or the oft-mentioned Patriot Scott Ritter were the bad guys.
    That style is not accidental.
    That style of communication is notoriously characteristic of one clandestine organization in the United States.
    It’s deliberate.
    Inverted communication….false premises and dishonest associations abound.

    The foundation is:
    1. Lira and Ritter were YouTube bros feeding each other
    2. Ritter and Lira shared antipathy toward bad-Ukraine and Zelensky.
    3. Both were/are American citizens
    4. Both advocated for Russia and its Special Operation

    However, Ritter’s bonafides look weak, unheroic traveling to and fro Russia promoting Putin’s position on the SMO while in contrast Gonzalo Lira appears badass, brave or suicidal blogging and YouTubeing against Zelensky’s Ukraine from heart of the beast.

    Of course, Ritter, ever the disorganized malignant narcissist (probably bipolar, manic, hyperthyroid), couldn’t stand the fact Lira in a war zone wore an olive drab tee-shirt for good reason and Ritter wore the same olive drab tee because he wanted to look fat.
    Affectation mattered to these two guys.
    They had to act the part primarily for the man in the mirror.
    Ouch!
    I digress.

    Ukraine arrests Lira and according to Ritter’s musings and the SBU “turns†Lira to propagandize in their favor.
    The rest is history or according Scott Ritter “We’re at War†which he repeats ad nauseam.
    Ritter makes no apologies for Lira’s demise nor tattooing the word “traitor†on his nominal “friendâ€.
    The “catch and release†process Ritter says was applied by Zelensky’s stooges to Lira can also be related to Scott Ritter’s personal history.
    You know, pot calls the kettle black.

    •ï¿½Replies: @MoT
    @Rich23

    I remember Ritters comments clearly. Bizarre. But, there again, we are "told" that Lira was "imprisoned" a second time.... and... just like before.... He babbles away about his intentions. Who in their right mind does that? Nobody for Christs sake! That's nuts.
  • Emslander says:
    June 9, 2024 at 11:16 am GMT •ï¿½100 Words
    @Notsofast
    @Emslander

    you guess wrong, because you can only imagine a false dichotomy, what if i asked you, "do you say this out of a sense of stupidity or dementia?" well my guess is......

    Replies: @Emslander

    I suspect you are a failed garage mechanic to whom punctuation and grammar are barriers to advancement, but you have the satisfaction on Unz of being able to insult pictures of your generic enemies that exist only in your mind. That’s a better motive than ignorance, but no dichotomy is necessary.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Notsofast
    @Emslander

    oh yeah, well i suspect your a retired schoolmarm, that misses the days when she could abuse her students, and make them write, the 10 rules of capitalization, one hundred times on the blackboard, after school.

    nailed it, didn't i?
  • @THE Germar Rudolf
    @NotAnonymousHere

    No, I sound like the most logical person on the road. If someone is coming up behind me in the passing lane, I have the situational awareness, lawful duty, and common sense to get over to let them pass IN THE PASSING LANE.

    People who don't abide by this common decency will get taught a hard lesson, and have their precious hogging of that lane and emotions fucked with the same way they are doing to me as I just try to drive in a straight line.

    The person who doesn't abide by the unwritten courtesy and actual legal duty to get over is the douche.

    Now go huff some fentanyl for all our sakes.

    Replies: @Brad Anbro

    You need to take your snide remarks and shove them where the sun doesn’t shine, including your use of swear words.

    In case you are not aware of it, this is 2024 and NOT 1968, when I learned how to drive; when roads, for the most part, were in excellent shape and where driving courtesy was the norm and there was no such thing as “road rage.”

    During the fall of 2019, I spent three weeks in Sweden, visiting my distant relatives and also many of the amateur radio (ham radio) operators that I had contacted over the years. The person with whom I was staying took me all over south central and southeast Sweden. At no time did I ever witness “road rage” or any driving that was not courteous. We were never “tailgated” once, nor did anyone ever pull out in front of us – they drove like drivers here in the USA used to drive in the 1960s.

    I distinctly remember that in the next few days after September 11, 2001, people here began to drive much more courteously, because they realized how precious life was. But that kind of behavior only lasted a few days and after that, they were back to their “Me First” driving habits.

    Wake up and see things as how they really are here. And take a good, long look in the mirror, while you’re at it!

    •ï¿½Replies: @NotAnonymousHere
    @Brad Anbro

    "Wake up and see things as how they really are here. And take a good, long look in the mirror, while you’re at it!"

    Preferably while driving. And I say that as the descendant of Holocaust survivors. Aren't we all survivors or descendants of survivors?

    With anti-semitism becoming the new cool thing in NYC schools, why is no one pointing out that the current administration is driving the country toward Nazism?

    Replies: @THE Germar Rudolf
    , @THE Germar Rudolf
    @Brad Anbro

    You can't 'tailgate' people who are breaking the law and common courtesy by hogging the passing lane and holding up traffic.

    And who says I'm tailgating when I'm behind them, flashing my brights and wanting to pass, and waiting for them to follow the law and get over.

    If you want to drive slow, i.e. the arbitrary speed limit or just a few over like a good little follow every rule to a T slave, go into the other two lanes and get the truck out of my way so I don't have to change lanes a hundred time to get around you and all the other derp ass self centered Americans, just going some entirely safe speed over the speed limit.

    You don't own the road, and definitely not the passing lane.

    I don't care how fast someone is going, if they are wanting to go faster than me, it is my legal duty and common courtesy to get over and let them pass IN THE PASSING LANE.

    Now get lost boomer.
  • werpor says:
    June 9, 2024 at 10:42 am GMT •ï¿½300 Words
    @Poupon Marx
    @werpor

    Buddha. Within us is infinity. Buddha preached and taught the path, not the destination on Google Maps. With clouds, elephants, gates, virgins, sheep.

    Replies: @werpor

    Odd choice “preached†… In point of fact — a true master — asks questions. Such teaching is rather more cryptic in tone than preaching.

    However leading people out of the wilderness necessitates a priori — something like indicating a path — suggested by a whisper or a hint.

    Preaching, as a rule — repels. And is as often as not self convincing. Preaching emanates from the head, i.e. pouring from the empty into the void — which is no doubt seductive. Its mark though is that there is no nourishment in it. The *congregation* remains unmoved, i.e. stuck.

    Your remark hints but is blunted by being shallow. It is all very well to speak or write about being in the moment, the question is how?

    Here is a hint, a whisper if you will. I have a body though I am not the body. However the *body* is dependably in the moment. Unlike thoughts and feelings which tend to be everywhere but in the moment. Our bodies are devoid of the presence of a master in the house. The master understands how to corral one’s wayward attention — which of necessity for those wishing to be in the moment — is indispensable.

    So before we can have a master within — it is indispensable to our realization, that we find a master without — someone who understands the enormous difficulty of corralling the our wayward thoughts and unconnected feelings.

    The world is full to overflowing with charlatans — as sincere as they may seem, whom are often themselves convinced they understand. They may even know many things but knowledge and understanding are worlds apart.

    Noticeably, we tend to be satisfied with substitutes of all sorts — knowledges rather than understanding — until the substitutes turn sour.

    Meanwhile we are fed upon which is why so many of us feel so empty.

  • Anonymous[128] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:
    June 9, 2024 at 9:50 am GMT •ï¿½100 Words
    @William Everett
    @ghali

    Russia is most infamous for journalist assassinations. In China, dissident journalists can expect to die in a Chinese prison. (I don't think the US openly targets journalists, although other repressive regimes may.) Islamic nations are widely known to kill journalists and suppress free speech. Most Eastern powers violently suppress free speech. A balanced view on the subject is ideal, otherwise this contributes to the lop-sided dissemination of anti-Western Eastern propaganda that tends to dominate this website.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_journalists_killed_in_Russia

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-59544226

    (In my opinion, Russia should be a Western Sphere nation and people, but the current regime in Russia has chosen to align East. Notwithstanding what or whom is to blame for this, the situation is untenable for the survival of the White race.)

    Replies: @dogbumbreath, @Anonymous

    (I don’t think the US openly targets journalists, although other repressive regimes may.)

    You are gullible beyond repair. Idiot, The majority of American journalists are in the POCKET of CIA, You are so stupid and gullible that do not know Russia always was part of the CRIMINAL WEST. However, you have become so criminal and corrupt that want to destroy Russia as well. The world spit at the criminals who have committed many genocide in the world. Get some help or fuck off.

  • @Partic
    If forced to speculate I'd guess Ritter's claim is bullshit.
    He seems to have become a quasi UTube celebrity, and his videos have become more and more bizarre as he ratchets up more and more extreme pronouncements on both Ukraine and Gaza. His lack of any real specifics about his passport seizure combined with his strange warning to the good Judge to cancel his Russia flight certainly strains credulity. Scott Ritter was a lonely and courageous critic of the 2nd Iraq war.
    His subsequent 2 arrests do seem suspect especially the first one, but unless the second one is an outright fabrication there does seem to be a little fire along with a lot of smoke. He's a complex character and both Ukraine and Gaza has seen his star rise, at least on Social Media. I hope for his well being this passport episode is real, but I won't hold my breath waiting for any real details.

    Replies: @Commentator Mike, @Poupon Marx

    So you’re saying Scott Ritter is another Jussie Smollett, making up a hoax to present himself as a victim. That would be a shame if he has sunk so low. Can’t he be sued for this hoax like Jussie Smollett was?

  • 36 ulster says:
    June 9, 2024 at 7:05 am GMT •ï¿½100 Words
    @Dr. Rock
    @OrangeSmoke


    “A child of Holocaust survivorsâ€.
    �
    I am already, so sick of this goddamned phrase! You notice how it's become the replacement for "holocaust survivor"? Because even now, the typical "holocaust survivor" is someone born in 1944, with some type of lineage related to Europe, and obviously jewish.

    It's also remarkable, that there doesn't appear to be a single, solitary, non-jew "holocaust survivor"?

    No Gypsies, no homos, no political prisoners, no Russians, or Poles, or Romanians, just all jews.

    Even the bullshit history claims that the camps weren't 100% filled with jews, that other, non-jews, were also put in the camps, but just like a goddamned miracle, apparently, none of them survived, and only jews did, and somehow they "survived" by (at this point) being born as late as 5 minutes before the war ended.

    And it's also fascinating, that this whole "holocaust survivor" moniker, really only came to be hyper-employed in the last 10-20 years. It existed before then, obviously, but it didn't used to be so fucking prevalent.

    Now, because raw math is making it harder and harder to claim to be a jewish "holocaust survivor" (they gotta be at least 79 years old to "sell it"), we are getting "child of holocaust survivor", and once again, like a fucking miracle, every single one of them is a jew!!

    From jew run wiki-

    The Holocaust was the genocide of European Jews during World War II. Between 1941 and 1945, Nazi Germany and its collaborators systematically murdered some six million Jews across German-occupied Europe, around two-thirds of Europe's Jewish population. The murders were carried out primarily through mass shootings and poison gas in extermination camps, chiefly Auschwitz-Birkenau, Treblinka, Belzec, Sobibor, and Chełmno in occupied Poland. Separate Nazi persecutions killed a similar or larger number of non-Jewish civilians and POWs; the term Holocaust is sometimes used to refer to the persecution of these other groups.

    And yet, there doesn't appear to be a single non-jew "holocaust survivor", or a solitary non-jew "child of holocaust survivors", and if there is a non-jew "child of parents that died in the holocaust", I've never heard of them!

    I know it's a little thing, but it's just so fucking sickening, that with the time running out for the blessed talisman of all things holy = Holocaust Survivor!, we are now being fed this steady diet of "child of holocaust survivor" (as if that would mean shit, even if somehow true) because the fucking jews don't want to lose that talmudic "street cred" of being able to reference the fucking Holy-Cause(t) every fucking time they open their mouths, so now it's their bullshit kids.

    And mark my words, in no time flat, every jew on the planet will miraculously become the "child of holocaust survivors", or "grandchildren of holocaust survivors", or "had family members that died in the holocaust", or "whatever whatever whatever holocaust".

    Like that rat fink fuck jew Blinken, whose step-father, escaped from every death camp in Europe, twice!

    https://jewishjournal.com/commentary/326418/understanding-blinken-through-his-stepfather-holocaust-survivor-samuel-pisar/

    "was how far his stepfather had come. Pisar, as Blinken mentioned, “was one of 900 children in his school in BiaÅ‚ystok, Poland, but the only one to survive the Holocaust after four years in concentration camps.â€

    "With the help of two friends, Ben and Niko, Pisar resisted the isolation and loneliness, desperation and despair as he went from camp to camp, and he made it to liberation."

    and this over-used tired gem of jew lore-

    "Blinken repeated the story his stepfather told of liberation in his confirmation speech:

    The tank resumed its advance [toward the barn], lumbering cautiously toward me. I looked for the hateful swastika, but there wasn’t one…Instead, I made out an unfamiliar emblem. It was the five-pointed white star…I was in front of the tank, waving my arms. The hatch opened. A big Black man climbed out, swearing unintelligibly at me…I fell at the Black man’s feet, threw my arms around his legs and yelled at the top of my lungs: “God bless America.â€

    A famous fraud, con, bullshit, used more than once by multiple jews, pile of horseshit!

    And here is some more fancy jew bullshit-

    "Polish ghettos were a place of hunger and squalor. For the Jews, ghettos constituted a way of life. For their captors, ghettos were a place to contain the Jews until the infrastructure for their destruction — industrialized killing centers with gassing facilities — was set in place. Death camps were opened in the winter of 1942, and within 15 months, 80% of the Jews murdered in the Holocaust were already dead.

    In 1942, Samuel was deported with his mother and sister, both of whom were killed upon arrival. The 13-year-old Samuel avoided immediate death by declaring himself 18. His three years in captivity took him to the slave labor camps of Majdanek and Blizyn, the death camp of Auschwitz, the German concentration camps of Sachsenhausen, Oranienburg, Dachau and finally to the slave labor complex of the Engelberg Tunnel."

    Wow! Now the Evil Nazis managed to kill all 6 million in only 15 months! Just not this guy, because those same Nazis were so dumb, that they allowed a 13 yo jewish boy, to convince them that he was 18! And then, he went on his whirlwind tour of every "Death Camp" availiable!

    I'm surprised he didn't also personally meet Hitler, Mengele, and Himmler!

    Just so much jew horse shit, that it boggles the fucking mind!

    "Child of holocaust survivors", yeah, right, my ass!

    Replies: @DanFromCT, @36 ulster

    If the tank crewman was from the 761st Tank Battalion, and if the stepdad was an inmate of the Gunskirchen Camp, there may be some truth to it, but this hasn’t yet passed the smell test. In fact, it reeks of the cynical, unrequited “love” between Jews and blacks that riles so many of us. If the tank commander had been an average, ordinary white guy, what kind of poignant, feel-good story would that make?

    •ï¿½Replies: @Dr. Rock
    @36 ulster

    Someone, and it may have been Unz, did a deep dive of this BS story, and proved, almost without doubt, that it couldn't have happened, at least not the way it was described, using locations units, the dates, etc.

    Also, I believe he said that this same story has been used more than once, by more than one person.

    I don't need to look past his whirlwind tour of famous camps- I thought these were all death camps, why didn't the first camp just gas him in the chambers, make some soap and a lampshade, and burn the rest in the nuclear powered crematoriums?
    , @Dr. Rock
    @36 ulster

    Here it is, give it a read-

    https://www.unz.com/ejones/antony-blinken-is-a-holocaust-liar/

    Replies: @Z-man
  • Oy Vey! Michael Fay is Jewish! His grandparents were Holocaust survivors, too!

    https://www.tampabay.com/archive/1994/04/14/frustrated-father-gives-his-all-to-spare-son-from-caning/

    Interesting that!

    Maybe a large percentage of the American School students you refer to are of Hebrew extraction.

    •ï¿½Thanks: littlereddot
  • @Blissex
    @THE Germar Rudolf

    «I got pulled over for barely speeding the other day, and the first statement I made to the very decent cop, was about why Germany has the autobahn with no speed limit and the US doesn’t…»

    Notorious "historian" Newt Gingrich commented on this and Real American character some decades ago:

    "A new look at environmental policy" NAEP News, 1995:
    https://aspace-uwg.galileo.usg.edu/repositories/2/archival_objects/124552
    «In Germany on the Autobahn there is no speed limit. If tomorrow the Bundestag adopted a 100km, or 62-mph speed limit, virtually every German would obey it. Until, that is, the next election when they would wipe out the current politicians and they would elect the "No Speed-Limit" Party.
    Now this is a significant insight that American reformers have neglected for 30 years, and is the great mistake of the Great Society and everything that followed it.
    And I don't want to offend anybody, but let me suggest to you that the American cultural response to the challenge of speed limits has been dramatically different than [sic] the German one. For most Americans speed limit is a benchmark of opportunity. This is not a light insight.

    If you have a society where almost every middle class person routinely fudges the law, that's telling us something. We have laws that matter-murder, rape, and we have laws that don't matter. Speed limits are an example. Why would you think that a regulatory, process-oriented bureaucratic model would work?
    The first thing that every good American says each morning is "What's the angle?" "How can I get around it?" "What does my lawyer think?" "There must be a loophole!" Then he proceeds to work the angle, and the bureaucracy spends its time chasing that and writing new regs. to stop him.
    America is the most incentive-driven society on the planet.»

    Replies: @THE Germar Rudolf

    Very interesting and poignant comment. I salute you.

    I question the need for the ‘every Middle Class person’ routinely fudges the law.

    I don’t think there is any need for a class distinction at all. In fact, the higher class you are, the more you can and will get away with. Eg. Celebrity, wealthy privilege and connections/lawyer power.

  • @NotAnonymousHere
    @THE Germar Rudolf

    You sound like the world's biggest douche.

    Replies: @THE Germar Rudolf

    No, I sound like the most logical person on the road. If someone is coming up behind me in the passing lane, I have the situational awareness, lawful duty, and common sense to get over to let them pass IN THE PASSING LANE.

    People who don’t abide by this common decency will get taught a hard lesson, and have their precious hogging of that lane and emotions fucked with the same way they are doing to me as I just try to drive in a straight line.

    The person who doesn’t abide by the unwritten courtesy and actual legal duty to get over is the douche.

    Now go huff some fentanyl for all our sakes.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Brad Anbro
    @THE Germar Rudolf

    You need to take your snide remarks and shove them where the sun doesn't shine, including your use of swear words.

    In case you are not aware of it, this is 2024 and NOT 1968, when I learned how to drive; when roads, for the most part, were in excellent shape and where driving courtesy was the norm and there was no such thing as "road rage."

    During the fall of 2019, I spent three weeks in Sweden, visiting my distant relatives and also many of the amateur radio (ham radio) operators that I had contacted over the years. The person with whom I was staying took me all over south central and southeast Sweden. At no time did I ever witness "road rage" or any driving that was not courteous. We were never "tailgated" once, nor did anyone ever pull out in front of us - they drove like drivers here in the USA used to drive in the 1960s.

    I distinctly remember that in the next few days after September 11, 2001, people here began to drive much more courteously, because they realized how precious life was. But that kind of behavior only lasted a few days and after that, they were back to their "Me First" driving habits.

    Wake up and see things as how they really are here. And take a good, long look in the mirror, while you're at it!

    Replies: @NotAnonymousHere, @THE Germar Rudolf
  • @complex pseudonymic handle
    @TKK

    https://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2017/06/16/533229449/after-otto-warmbiers-release-will-u-s-ban-travel-to-north-korea

    Described as "a young, thrill-seeking great kid" by his father, and ethnically Jewish from his mother, Otto Warmbier was arrested by North Korean authorities for purloining a propaganda poster.

    He was returned to the US after 17 months in confinement, comatose, and died within a week when his parents had his feeding tube pulled.

    Not a great place for free-range tourists.

    Replies: @littlereddot

    Not a great place for free-range tourists.

    Ever so often I have the misfortune of being on the same subway train as kids from the American School here in Singapore. When I used to still watch movies in cinemas, I would cringe when American kids entered, because they would be sitting with their feet over the chairs in front of them, talking and laughing loudly, and throwing popcorn all over the place.

    There are plenty of other international schools here, French, Japanese, Indian etc…their kids are all well behaved. The kids from the American School stand out because they are exceptionally loud and boisterous to the point of being offensive.

    What American parents think of as “normal thrill seeking” behaviour in kids is seen as obnoxious, antisocial and in some cases, downright criminal in other parts of the world.

    This little monster got off with a lighter sentence because your President pressured our government into it…it cheeses Singaporeans off “American Exceptionalism” till this day.

    You are right, Otto Warmbier should not have been punished in N Korea. His parents should have taken his place.


    Video Link

    •ï¿½Agree: 36 ulster
  • @littlereddot
    @werpor


    mind, the body, and the emotions
    �
    These are excellent points you bring up.

    In our prevailing consensus, we like to think that the body is controlled by the emotions, and the emotions are in turn controlled by the mind, being at the top of the pyramid...although IMHO in reality, they all influence each other.

    But my sense is that there is more beyond the three. There is something else that motivates the mind to do what it does. I struggle to put a name to it. Shall I call it Conscience? or Inspiration? or our Higher Selves (though this term is too nebulous to be useful).

    What are your thoughts on these?

    Replies: @Poupon Marx, @werpor

    C G Jung was a buddha. He had this figured out. Individual Consciousness, Collective Consciousnes, the Ego, the Self, the Shadow, etc, etc. None of these are real but only are when they lead to understanding and realization.

    •ï¿½Thanks: littlereddot
  • @werpor
    @Poupon Marx

    All very interesting…but you have strayed from economics to *metaphysics. We cannot write entire books here but Jung’s analysis of Adolf Hitler is hardly relevant. On that basis what are to make of any handful of megalomaniacs?

    Mefobills main thesis can be distilled down to a critique of the Federal Reserve and a question — what is there in past that may help us understand the present; economically at any rate? I agree with his main thesis — that the U.S. Federal Reserve is today and has been since its inception a dangerous instrument.

    Why would any country tolerate being socially and economically defenestrated? And speaking of megalomaniacs, what is one to make of Benjamin Netanyahu? How is that Americans tolerate him being invited to deliver an address to a joint session of Congress on July 24.

    What relevance to present circumstances would Jung’s analysis of Benjamin Netanyahu have — were Jung still alive today to do it — on public perception. Americans today are no less susceptible to being seduced by public figures than Germans’ in the 1930s. President Obama could be seen in Chicago Nov 6, 2012 seducing the crowd.

    The U.S. has been projecting violence throughout the world for decades. …No different than Adolf Hitler and equally violent. Instead of a flag with a swastika — cribbed from various cultures around the world — which remains still as a symbol of good luck and prosperity among the Hindi, Buddhist, and Jain countries such as Nepal, India, Thailand, Sri Lanka, China and Japan, and among the Navajo of the Southwest United States — the United States flys a flag derived from one flown by the British East India Company.

    Jung’s writings include the power of symbolism to compel behaviour as well as the power of rhetorical exhibitionism to compel mass psychosis. As a rule both are projections — the velvet glove you might say — over the iron fist.

    Everything you write about Germany and Adolf Hitler can be written about Winston Churchill in Great Britain or FDR in the United States. There are many variations of ways to stir up and compel behaviours theistically consistent with a ruling elites intentions. Then there is music — fife and drum, marching bands, bagpipes, even rock and roll.

    *Metaphysics is barely understood anywhere — even in the lands from which metaphysics emerged.

    Religion is a degraded manifestation of insights never easily understood. Millions of humans have knowledge about the degraded forms of metaphysical insights. And of course this includes the power possessing elites — whether popes or kings. People without an inner anchor are malleable. The power possessors are no less unanchored — but more so. Though power possessors can never be persuaded that more power, more money, and a more elevated position is less.

    Metaphysics is a work of development. It is not belief! Indeed it is certainty — but not intellectual certainty. People cannot be persuaded that they have no understanding about the bodies they inhabit, other than the pursuit of pleasure which no doubt includes even ordinary work. Our bodies like working. The problem for the metaphysician is that almost everyone lives in their head and is run by their emotions. Few people have done the work necessary to balance the three energies — the energy of the body, the energy of thoughts and the energy of their emotions. Not to mention the problem of imagination — the disease of tomorrow and the lures of imagined other lives.

    Think here three horses. The head with its imaginary yearnings, the body with its insatiable busyness, the emotions fragile and unstable — and the reins to each of the horses tied around one’s neck. They are untamed. First one horse is given its head then another horse is given its head then the third horse wanders off in search of greener pastures. The three horses must be tamed and trained to work together. This requires a mastery over the mind, the body, and the emotions.

    Who has that?

    Metaphysics is not philosophy. Metaphysics is not about obtaining outer things. It is about mastering the wild horses within us. Who knows how to begin? Who understands the necessity of beginning?

    Who knows where to look?

    Replies: @littlereddot, @Poupon Marx, @Jardine Sassoon

    Buddha. Within us is infinity. Buddha preached and taught the path, not the destination on Google Maps. With clouds, elephants, gates, virgins, sheep.

    •ï¿½Replies: @werpor
    @Poupon Marx

    Odd choice “preached†… In point of fact — a true master — asks questions. Such teaching is rather more cryptic in tone than preaching.

    However leading people out of the wilderness necessitates a priori — something like indicating a path — suggested by a whisper or a hint.

    Preaching, as a rule — repels. And is as often as not self convincing. Preaching emanates from the head, i.e. pouring from the empty into the void — which is no doubt seductive. Its mark though is that there is no nourishment in it. The *congregation* remains unmoved, i.e. stuck.

    Your remark hints but is blunted by being shallow. It is all very well to speak or write about being in the moment, the question is how?

    Here is a hint, a whisper if you will. I have a body though I am not the body. However the *body* is dependably in the moment. Unlike thoughts and feelings which tend to be everywhere but in the moment. Our bodies are devoid of the presence of a master in the house. The master understands how to corral one’s wayward attention — which of necessity for those wishing to be in the moment — is indispensable.

    So before we can have a master within — it is indispensable to our realization, that we find a master without — someone who understands the enormous difficulty of corralling the our wayward thoughts and unconnected feelings.

    The world is full to overflowing with charlatans — as sincere as they may seem, whom are often themselves convinced they understand. They may even know many things but knowledge and understanding are worlds apart.

    Noticeably, we tend to be satisfied with substitutes of all sorts — knowledges rather than understanding — until the substitutes turn sour.

    Meanwhile we are fed upon which is why so many of us feel so empty.
  • @Mefobills
    @MoT


    Nabiullina? What I would like to know is how this person got away with putting 300 billion in jeopardy only to later be hailed as some sort of wonder woman. Some have been jailed or executed for less.
    �
    I want to know too. Putin doesn't really listen to her. Some sort of 3D chess perhaps. Keeping her in position, since she is an Atlantacist, might be a red-herring to confuse the west.

    He listens to Glazyev, and promoted his trusted economist Belousov to control the military spending. Both of these men are nationalists and sovereign money types.

    Basically, Russia secretly is operating similarly to NSDAP Germany, but still has some "privateering banks," as did Germany. The "ethnic" oligarchs in Russia tend to swarm around these banks - no surprise.

    Replies: @Poupon Marx, @MoT

    You’re such a fantasist. Too many comic books and video games. I thought you eccentric and perhaps hitting the bong too hard. But you are in “make it up as I go along” land. IOW, a whack job. Silly and estupido.

  • @TKK
    @littlereddot

    Yes, you should totally go.

    It will be a great vacation.

    Even better, I think you should try to break off from your tour group and look at things that you were not supposed to see. You know- just be a little adventurous.

    Nothing will happen. You are right- it is a totally safe country. It is like the Switzerland of the Far East.

    Enjoy your trip!!!!

    Replies: @littlereddot, @complex pseudonymic handle

    https://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2017/06/16/533229449/after-otto-warmbiers-release-will-u-s-ban-travel-to-north-korea

    Described as “a young, thrill-seeking great kid” by his father, and ethnically Jewish from his mother, Otto Warmbier was arrested by North Korean authorities for purloining a propaganda poster.

    He was returned to the US after 17 months in confinement, comatose, and died within a week when his parents had his feeding tube pulled.

    Not a great place for free-range tourists.

    •ï¿½Replies: @littlereddot
    @complex pseudonymic handle


    Not a great place for free-range tourists.
    �
    Ever so often I have the misfortune of being on the same subway train as kids from the American School here in Singapore. When I used to still watch movies in cinemas, I would cringe when American kids entered, because they would be sitting with their feet over the chairs in front of them, talking and laughing loudly, and throwing popcorn all over the place.

    There are plenty of other international schools here, French, Japanese, Indian etc...their kids are all well behaved. The kids from the American School stand out because they are exceptionally loud and boisterous to the point of being offensive.

    What American parents think of as "normal thrill seeking" behaviour in kids is seen as obnoxious, antisocial and in some cases, downright criminal in other parts of the world.

    This little monster got off with a lighter sentence because your President pressured our government into it...it cheeses Singaporeans off "American Exceptionalism" till this day.

    You are right, Otto Warmbier should not have been punished in N Korea. His parents should have taken his place.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yih_MiIFVbc