RSS
Jean-Marie Le Pen, the co-founder of the French National Front — now called the National Rally — died today at age 96 “surrounded by his loved ones,” the family reported. He was a great Frenchman, a patriot who served his nation all his life. He was hated by the French Left and reviled by the “respectable” Right, but he built a party that now may have more popular support than any other in France. In 1998, I was lucky enough to meet Mr. Le Pen in one of my most memorable experiences as an advocate for our people.
Le Pen’s nickname was Le Menhir. This is the French word for the prehistoric standing stones that dot northern Europe. The name evoked Le Pen’s granite resistance against attacks of all kinds.
Le Pen was born in Brittany in 1928; his father was a fisherman. The senior Le Pen joined the French navy and was killed in 1942 when his ship hit a mine and blew up. Jean-Marie became a ward of the state at age 14. He went on to attend university in Toulouse, where he was known as a militant anti-communist, not afraid to duke it out with political enemies.
In 1953, he organized a group of student volunteers to help victims of flooding in the Netherlands. The next year, he enlisted in the Army and served in Indochina and Suez. He was first elected to the French National Assembly in 1956, where, at 28, he was the second-youngest delegate. He later rejoined the Army and was sent to Algeria in 1957 at the height of the war for independence, as part of an elite paratroop battalion. He was accused of torturing Algerians — a charge he always denied.
Throughout the 1950s and 1960s, Le Pen was active in conservative and monarchist circles, but his rise to prominence began when he co-founded the National Front in 1972 with Francois Duprat. Duprat, whose goal was to bring all conservatives under a single banner, was assassinated in a car-bomb attack in 1978. Le Pen himself was the target of an assassination attempt in 1976, when a bomb went off in his Paris apartment, seriously damaging the building. Le Pen was not home. No one was ever arrested for the crime, nor did any group claim responsibility, but far-left fanatics hated Le Pen’s unwavering nationalism.
From the beginning, the National Front firmly opposed mass immigration, and this earned Le Pen the label of “far-right” and “racist.” I will not try to cover anything like his long and distinguished political career, which included five runs for president of France, 10 years in the French Chamber of Deputies, and 24 years in the European Parliament. He consistently campaigned for national sovereignty against the European Union, secure borders, and what he called préférence nationale, or putting Frenchmen first.
I was fortunate enough to meet Le Pen in 1998, when I visited France for the Front’s annual Bleu Blanc Rouge (blue white red) festival. It was a marvelous experience: 100,000 patriots from every corner of France gathered to honor their nation, their movement, and their leader. It was a dazzling combination of political rally, food fair, outdoor market, lecture series, and rock concert, all on fairgrounds at the edge of Paris. More than 100 booths tempted festivalgoers with literature, music, activism, and regional delicacies. Many people spent hours at the festival, where they had lunch and dinner.
Le Pen circulated through the grounds, greeting activists, tasting regional dishes, and signing books — always surrounded by admirers. He shook thousands of hands, and rewarded lady well-wishers with French-style kisses on both cheeks. He was perhaps the most charismatic man I have ever met.
The highlight of the festival was his “great patriotic discourse” on Sunday afternoon. He mesmerized an audience of 20,000 for an hour and a half. I was moved by his invocation of ancestors:
It is the blood of our fathers that flows in our veins — the same blood that flowed to defend France and make it great. Our lives are embedded in this land, which our fathers preserved and improved. It is their language that we speak. When we eat of the products of the land — symbolized by bread and wine — we commune with our fathers by partaking of our nation, both material and spiritual. And when our souls depart this world below, it will be within the maternal soil that our bodies will repose.
His stirring conclusion brought the audience roaring to its feet:
Because I believe that men are creatures of God, I believe they have a transcendent duty, an immense debt to those who have given them life, and endowed them with the spirit of love, beauty and harmony in one of the most beautiful countries on earth. They have a scared duty to their children to whom they owe, on pain of treason, the preservation of this heritage. And they have a duty to all of humanity and to their own history to testify to the greatness and nobility of their fatherland. Long live the free nations of a European Europe. Long live the peoples of Europe. Long live the Front National. Long live France!
Together with Tom Dover of the Council of Conservative Citizens, I had the honor of presenting Le Menhir with a Confederate battle flag that had flown over the South Carolina state house. He accepted it with great warmth and appreciation.
I was also privileged to meet some of Le Pen’s most brilliant followers: Bruno Megret, Jean-Yves Le Gallou, and Bruno Gollnisch. In later years, both Mr. Le Gallou and Mr. Gollnisch were speakers at American Renaissance conferences.
I will never forget the awe I felt for a movement the like of which Americans can only dream, even now. And I well remember how I laughed at the way Le Monde, the lefty French “newspaper of record,” sniffed at the festival: “an angry village of Gauls with a siege mentality and paranoid reflexes,” an “island well outside the ordinarily agreed-upon ethics of democratic debate.” The sneering only made Le Pen’s achievements that much more remarkable.
Le Pen was proof of what a great man can achieve. He attracted fervent support from every part of the nationalist right: monarchists, traditional Catholics, anti-Communists, pagans, and Vichy sympathizers. He was a vehement critic of de Gaulle’s policies, especially his betrayal, as Le Pen saw it, of Algeria, but many Gaullists joined his movement. All set aside their differences to follow a man who spoke so passionately for France.
Of course, Mr. Le Pen made mistakes. He was disqualified from running in the 1999 Euro-elections because of an earlier brush with a socialist that got slightly physical. He unwisely decided that in his place, he would appoint his young and relatively recent second wife, Jany, at the head of the Front’s electoral list. Jany was charming but had never held office, and many party members scorned Le Pen’s decision. This and other matters led to a very nasty split, with the Front losing some of its most capable men.
However, the Front survived, and Le Pen’s electoral eligibility was restored. In 2002, he managed a staggering breakthrough when he came in second in the first round of the French presidential elections in a fragmented field. This qualified him for the second round against incumbent Jacques Chirac, an achievement that terrified the entire European establishment. The full French political spectrum, from center-right to far left, united to crush him, leaving him with only 17.8 percent of the vote in the second round. However, Le Pen had proven that an outspoken nationalist could shake the political foundations of a major European country.
Le Pen was always a brawler — a verbal brawler after he gave up the street-fighting of his youth. He constantly pushed the limits of what he called France’s “liberticide” anti-free-speech laws, and was convicted at least 25 times for inciting racial hatred, anti-Semitism, and holocaust denial. Perhaps his most famous case of “hate speech” was to have said, in 1987, “I’m not saying the gas chambers didn’t exist. I haven’t seen them myself. I haven’t particularly studied the question. But I believe it’s just a detail in the history of World War II.” He also doubted the Nazis killed as many as six million Jews.
Comments like this irritated his daughter Marine, who had become head of the party in 2011. Other members thought the brawler had become a liability to a party that was trying to “detoxify” and “rebrand.” In what must have been one of the bitterest moments in Jean-Marie’s life, the party suspended and then expelled him in 2015. Three years later, in an attempt further to distance the party from its roots, Marine changed the name from the National Front to the National Rally.
Marine Le Pen went on to take the party to heights never achieved under her father. She advanced to the second round of French presidential elections in 2017 and 2022, though was defeated both times by Emmanuel Macron. In 2022, she won a very respectable 41.5 percent of the vote. Opinion polls consistently put her at first place for the 2027 election. Depending on the metric used, the National Rally is considered the most or second-most popular party in France.
Many attribute this success to Marine’s softening of her father’s positions, but her party is still treated as a pariah. Even now, she would probably face a left-right coalition to keep her out of the presidential palace. It is impossible to know whether the National Rally’s success is due to Marine’s more moderate tone or to a rising national/racial consciousness among the French and Europeans in general.
Fortunately, there was reconciliation between father and daughter, especially in 2018 when Jean-Marie was hospitalized. Later that year, all three daughters were present to celebrate his 90th birthday.
Jean-Marie openly supported Marine’s 2022 run for president.
Let us hope that this great man, whose health had been failing for some months, died in peace. He loved France and its people with all his heart, and in death, countrymen who never voted for him seem to recognize this.
Bruno Retailleau, current Minister of the Interior under Le Pen-hostile Emanual Macron
“Today, a page has turned in the history of French politics. Whatever one’s opinion of Jean Marie Le Pen may be, he will have undoubtedly left his stamp on his era. I extend all my condolences to Marine Le Pen and her loved ones.”
Jean-Marie Le Pen fought the Great Replacement before it even had the name — given to it by another far-seeing Frenchman, Renaud Camus.
I count myself blessed to have been able to shake his hand, look him in the eye, and tell him how much I admired him. May we have many more men like him.
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thanks for this piece.
Jan. 7 is Orthodox Christmas. Madam Marine Le Pen’s being born in 1968 also intriguing. Merry Christmas!
confederate flag is for losers. you lost the civil war, remember?
world war 2 was a big mistake but it’s a consequence of world war 1. both resulted from colonialism, which was a grave mistake. Europe was punished for the looting, plunder, murder and racism against the rest of the world. Hitler viewed in this light, was the great avenger. (Russia was different, her sin was communism.) unable to cope with the idea and knowledge that there is a Just God who visits judgement on the haughty so speedily, unfortunately many lost faith instead of being humbled and seeking repentance. our fallen nature, human folly!
migration too is a result of colonialism, invade and invite.
as long as you hate, you will be a loser. because the universe was created in a great act of love. if you hate, you will be at war against nature, against your own raison d’etre.
as long as you hate, you will be a loser. because the universe was created in a great act of love. if you hate, you will be at war against nature, against your own raison d’etre.
Words of wisdom!
Anger against injustice is not “hate”, unless you are a talmudic casuist. This is a major confusion of our time.
To quote Aquinas: “He who is not angry when there is just cause for anger is immoral. Why? Because anger looks to the good of justice. And if you can live amid injustice without anger, you are immoral as well as unjust.”
Amazing how Whites in the West were so easily convinced to give up their countries and their civilization. Le Pen’s mindset should have been the norm, yet it was rare.
Hate is the natural and proper way to feel towards enemies. You can’t love if you don’t hate.
Christianity teaches many absurd things, virgin mothers and such.
Unfortunately for France — and completely unlike her father — Marine Le Pen is merely another slobbering Zionist-stooge, just like all the other major ‘rightwing’ politicians in the West today. Perhaps Big Daddy Jean-Marie should have a taken more interest in the subject of the Holohoax! Then he might have raised her better. But alas …
Alternate View;
Le Pen agreed to be the ‘evil opposition’ so that no left wing opposition to immigration, based on basic laws of supply and demand of labor, could ever raise its head. Thus Le Pen insured the great replacement.
Mitterrand the Socialist Godfather was also the midwife to Le Pen’s rise and his party. A cool trick, which meant Le Pen and descendants could always be used to insure the ‘center’, ie the neoliberal globalists, always won.
The reward for Le Pen was money, and a family empire. Are we not going to mention nepotism? Not just the daughter, the current male face of Le Pen’s party is married to Le Pen’s grand-daughter. There are a lot of other family members mixed in there, sucking off the public teat. It’s a political family mafia empire, like the Clinton Family but even more entrenched in lapping up tax dollars.
And look what Marine Le Pen did during Covid! Complete conformity with the freedom destruction, the ‘passe sanitaire’:
Le Pen is the MAIN reason the Great Replacement is happening in France.
the idiocy of your reasoning lies (unintentional yet appropriate pun!) in the delusion that you can wish away the Truth, or that if you reject the Truth vehemently, it will somehow go away or cease being the Truth. yours is truly the magical thinking not based on any logic but only expressing your hateful and demented frustrations and disappointments.
Christian Truth is the one and only Absolute Truth. please, please, please open your eyes and ears, and read.
https://ethiotewahido.blogspot.com/2020/08/behold-from-henceforth-all-generations.html
Nice point. People find such switcheroos very hard to understand.
The key point is that there would have been leftist opposition to immigration.
Like Karl Marx, who was opposed to immigration.
There would have been, but for Le Pen.
And so the “opposition” secretly works on behalf of its opposite.
Thus it always is.
In his ideas and political presence, perhaps similar to Pat Buchanan, albeit Buchanan did not run for office as often as Le Pen.
One problem with the RN is that it often seems more like a family project than a political party — after losing badly in the final round 2x (however ‘respectable’ Mr Taylor may find it, 41.5% means Macron won almost 50% more votes), it’s a bit strange that she is still leader of the party, and likely to again be its main candidate for the highest office — despite ‘opinion polls consistently putting her at first place for the 2027 election’, I think it’s almost a certainty that she will lose again — I am far from convinced that Marine Le Pen is the right person to lead the RN into the next election.
Lately she’s also squishy on migration and race, e.g. she very publicly distanced herself and her party from the AfD over the phony ‘remigration’ controversy.
Streit um ‘Remigration’: Le Pen brüskiert Weidel
She’s obviously making efforts to appear more moderate — the concern is that even if she happens to gain power, which I see as very unlikely, she’ll turn out to be another Giorgia Meloni.
Le Pen was motivated by pure love.
Pure love of France.
The so-called “left” hasn’t been “left” for over 50 years. Take Sweden, for example, where under the guidance of pseudo leftist Olaf Palme, 20+ years of Tage Erlander’s extremely low immigration and a demand to integrate or be deported, Palme created a multicultural paradise.
Marx was opposed to immigration for economic reasons, not cultural ones, as were all 19th century leftists, including the anarchists.
“In the end, the Labour party could cease to represent labour. Stranger historic ironies have happened than that.” ~ Enoch Powell, The Sunday Telegraph, October 18, 1964.
Complete f*cking nonsense.
The ebola virus that kills a man in the most horrible way possible couldn’t give a damn about the man his life and his loves. It only ‘cares’ about replicating itself – like all known life.
In a similar way you never gave a damn about the chicken – whose only wish was to live – that was killed for your consumption.
Grow up.
While a person should certainly not make a regular habit of hating, as it’s not healthy and caustic, the Bible itself speaks of ‘hate’ sometimes having a place in our lives.
To use a much abused term, some of the biggest ‘haters’ in the world today have to be the modern ‘liberal’/’progressives’ themselves who project when they all too readily call others ‘haters’.
How much more hateful can a person or group be than to regularly wish for the murder and death of others, such as has been directed at Trump and his followers, and the very public celebrating of Le Pen’s recent death? It’s sick. [See video below ‘more’.]
https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Ecclesiastes-3-1_3-8/
Video Link
Video Link
They did not just lose the war of aggression from the north. The whole country lost. We should be able to have states rights but it was taken away from us by bullies. I wouldn’t be so proud if I were you.
You and that other guy are both retarded. Stop posting at once.!!!
https://substack.com/@eurosiberia/p-154355529
Flick Colby, an influential dancer and choreographer, was born into a family with a strong academic background, particularly in the field of German studies. Her father, Thomas E. Colby, was a Professor of German at Hamilton College in New York. This connection to academia may have fostered an appreciation for culture and the arts within her family, possibly influencing her career trajectory.
Later in life, Colby married George Bahlke, a professor of literature at the same college where her father taught. This connection further emphasizes a familial link to academia and the German language, although specific details about any direct ties to Germany itself remain unclear. The coincidence of her marrying someone with a Germanic name shortly before her death adds an intriguing layer to her personal narrative.
The video features a performance by Colby and her dance group Pan’s People, who were renowned for their appearances on the BBC show Top of the Pops during the 1970s. Colby, a talented choreographer, founded Pan’s People and created numerous dance routines that complemented the music of contemporary hits. The concept behind these performances was to visually enhance the music and provide an engaging experience for viewers.
In an era when music television was emerging, the combination of dance and music was revolutionary. Colby often had only a few hours to develop choreography, showcasing her creativity and adaptability. The performances by Pan’s People were not just entertainment; they played a significant role in establishing dance as a central element in music videos and live performances. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flick_Colby
Video Link
Video Link
Video Link
Orchestral Manoeuvres in the Dark has created notable music pieces that center around the theme of Joan of Arc, particularly through their songs “Joan of Arc” and “Maid of Orleans (The Waltz Joan of Arc).” Both tracks reflect the band’s fascination with historical figures and themes, particularly those related to religion and heroism.
“Maid of Orleans” was released on January 15, 1982, as part of their album Architecture & Morality. The song was inspired by the 550th anniversary of Joan of Arc’s death and features a distinctive melody played on a Mellotron, specifically utilizing its “3 Violins” sound, which gives it a unique sound reminiscent of a bagpipe.
The track is characterized by its waltz-like 6/8 time signature and includes electronic sounds that were added later during production. It became OMD’s most successful single, topping charts in several countries, including Germany, where it was the best-selling single of the year.
The music video for “Maid of Orleans,” directed by Steve Barron, features actress Julia Tobin and was filmed at picturesque locations like Brimham Rocks and Fountains Abbey. The visual representation complements the song’s themes, evoking a sense of historical reverence and emotional depth.
In addition to “Maid of Orleans,” OMD also released “Joan of Arc,” which further explores the narrative surrounding this iconic historical figure. The juxtaposition of these two songs highlights the band’s artistic approach to storytelling through music, blending historical context with contemporary pop sensibilities.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Barron
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julia_Tobin
The figure of Joan of Arc has transcended her historical existence to become a symbol steeped in myth and legend. Often portrayed as a divine warrior, she embodies the archetype of a hero who rises from humble beginnings to lead her nation against oppression. This transformation from a simple peasant girl to a military leader is shrouded in narratives that emphasize her ethereal visions and unwavering faith, creating an almost otherworldly persona.
Over time, the complexities of her life have been simplified into a singular narrative that highlights her as a beacon of hope and courage during a tumultuous period. This mythologization serves not only to inspire but also to reflect the cultural and national identity of France. However, the layers of myth surrounding her story invite skepticism regarding the extent to which her image has been crafted or manipulated for various agendas.
The comparison between Joan of Arc and the Children’s Crusades reveals intriguing parallels. Both phenomena were characterized by a blend of religious fervor, youthful naivety, and political manipulation. They shared unrealistic goals, adult exploitation, and a tragic misunderstanding of reality. Joan of Arc, like the Children’s Crusades, was co-opted by religious and political actors for their own agendas. These historical events demonstrate how easily people, especially the young, can be instrumentalized for larger causes.
In a modern context, one might draw parallels to the rise of Greta Thunberg as a climate activist. While Thunberg has undoubtedly raised awareness about climate change, questions arise about the extent of her influence and the forces behind her rapid rise to prominence. Unlike Joan of Arc, who faced dire consequences for her actions, Thunberg operates in a different era with its own set of challenges and support systems.
However, skeptics might question whether Thunberg’s prominence is entirely organic or if there are wealthy backers orchestrating her global platform. The “Greta effect” on social media and her ability to mobilize supporters while also facing backlash bears some resemblance to historical figures who became symbols of their causes. Yet, the modern media landscape and the potential for behind-the-scenes influence add layers of complexity to her story that weren’t present in Joan of Arc’s time.
The British and French have had a long history of conflict, characterized by rivalry and enmity. Their relationship dates back to the early Middle Ages and includes numerous significant conflicts, such as the Hundred Years’ War, which established a deep-seated animosity between the two nations. This war began as a feud over feudal rights but evolved into a national struggle that shaped the identities of both countries.
Throughout the centuries, Britain and France often found themselves on opposing sides in various wars, including the Seven Years’ War and the Napoleonic Wars. The competition for colonial dominance further fueled their rivalry, particularly during the age of imperialism when both nations sought to expand their empires across Africa and Asia.
Despite their bitter enmity, relations began to improve in the 19th century, culminating in the Entente Cordiale in 1904, which marked a significant shift towards cooperation. However, underlying tensions remained, especially during World War II when Britain and France faced complex challenges, including the German occupation of France.
The historical enmity between Britain and France is thus marked by a series of conflicts that laid the groundwork for a complicated relationship, oscillating between rivalry and cooperation. This dynamic continues to influence perceptions and interactions between the two nations today.
The French also have a complex historical connection to the Germanic tribes, particularly the Franks, from whom the name “France” is derived. The Franks were a Germanic tribe that settled in what is now France during the early Middle Ages. They played a significant role in the formation of the early French state, especially under King Clovis I, who united various Frankish kingdoms and converted to Christianity.
Despite their Germanic roots, the French language evolved from Vulgar Latin, which was spoken in Gaul before the arrival of the Franks. The influence of the Franks on the language was limited, primarily contributing vocabulary related to warfare and some place names. As a result, while the French people have genetic ties to Germanic tribes, their cultural and linguistic identity developed significantly through Roman influence and subsequent historical events.
Over time, France and Germany became embroiled in a series of conflicts that solidified their positions as rivals. This enmity was fueled by territorial disputes, nationalistic sentiments, and competition for dominance in Europe. The historical animosity between these nations has been marked by wars and political strife, particularly during the 19th and 20th centuries.
So French are of “Germanic blood” but possess a Latin culture that has been superimposed over time. The name “France” itself derives from the Franks, a Germanic tribe that settled in the region during the early Middle Ages. However, the cultural and linguistic identity of the French people has been significantly shaped by Roman influence, particularly through the adoption of Latin following the Roman conquest of Gaul.
The Franks, despite their Germanic origins, adopted the language of the conquered Galloromanes, which led to the development of Old French as a Latin dialect. This process illustrates how language is closely tied to culture; thus, while the French share genetic connections with Germanic tribes, their cultural identity is predominantly Latin due to the historical dominance of Roman civilization in the region.
Over time, France became a melting pot of various cultures and influences, including Celtic and later Germanic elements. The mixing of these different heritages has contributed to a unique French identity that is often described as gallo-romanic. Historical events, such as the French Revolution, further diluted the remnants of Germanic aristocratic lineage, leading to a more homogenized cultural identity.
The relationship between the Germanic peoples and the Romans was complex and shaped by various historical factors. While the Romans established control over parts of what is now Germany, the Germanic tribes did not adopt Latin as their primary language for several reasons.
Firstly, the Germanic tribes had a strong sense of cultural identity and social structure that was distinct from Roman culture. They maintained their own languages, traditions, and customs, which were integral to their identities. Additionally, the geographical factors played a significant role; the regions inhabited by the Germanic tribes were often remote and less integrated into the Roman Empire compared to areas like Gaul (modern-day France). This geographical separation contributed to the preservation of their languages.
Although Latin became the dominant language in many parts of the empire, it primarily influenced local elites and urban populations. The rural Germanic tribes remained largely unaffected by Romanization, especially in terms of language. After the fall of the Western Roman Empire, Latin evolved into various Romance languages in regions where it was dominant. In contrast, the Germanic languages continued to develop independently, leading to distinct linguistic traditions.
Furthermore, historical context played a crucial role; the Germanic tribes frequently resisted Roman expansion and influence. Military conflicts and invasions further solidified their linguistic and cultural separateness from Roman traditions. In summary, while there was interaction between the Germanic peoples and the Romans, the former maintained their linguistic identity due to cultural pride, geographical factors, and resistance to Romanization, resulting in the development of distinct Germanic languages that evolved independently from Latin.
The internet is awesome, isn’t it? Here’s a link for you:
https://fundamentals-freethought.blogspot.com/2012/03/one-hundred-contradictions-in-bible.html
one for example:
Exodus 24:11 against John 1:18
Tony Blair’s New Labour arrived “at the scene” – to make working-class things – – – – posh (=disappear).
PS
Would you know where exactly Marx wrote against immigration?
I can’t say that I do, but from an economic model perspective, Marx’s model cannot function with immigration beyond a trickle, because Communism requires full employment. The Soviets, Czechoslovakians and East Germans I met at university had two things they did not understand: taxes and unemployment. Taxes, because the state didn’t need to collect them as it owned everything, and unemployment because if your job ended, in a very short time you would be told where to report for work. Efficiency was never in the equation, keeping people occupied was. Malingerers had unemployment benefits cut off and were sent for “re-education”. As I have asked rhetorically in past, did the USSR have open borders? How about China and North Korea?
Thanks.
Compare this music and artistic video to today’s mindless, soulless rap music and twerking.
Society has been poisoned.
It will eventually recover I believe, well certain sectors will.
Economic reasons are the only reasons. “Cultural” reasons are bullshit.
https://monthlyreview.org/2017/02/01/marx-on-immigration/
Poor victim of the ongoing multiculti madness/aganda!
https://rmx.n*ws/article/france-pretty-24-year-old-barbara-strangled-and-tortured-to-death-inside-her-home-by-fouad/
*) e
There is no “Hannelone”, only Hannelore. Nobody in France is named that without German background. We can deduce that her mum was of German descent (like Ashley Babbit’s).
Her nick was “Erika” (like the famous German marching song), the female form of Erik or Erich. She didn’t speak German, but Russian. (“English” is not worth mentioning!)
The interesting question arises as to why we consider particularly pretty people and faces to be “more valuable” victims? Who cares if a homeless person is stabbed to death?
Presumably it has to do with kinda perfection mania “aestheticized” by Jew media, which identifies itself as perfect, therefore believes this is quasi its supplement.
One might ask, what kinda “nation” is “thee” American one? These people warble music from operas that never existed! Like that highly pretentious Japan-born pseudo-Virginian “resident”, Jew-lover and liar Taylor, who probably even expects “worship” for his systematic deception.
I can’t detect any prerequisite for “nation building” among these scattered renegades. In principle, these people should have remained absolutely under the strictest control of Europe, then it could not have grown in such a perverse way over the whole world.
But the weak-minded and inactive British “isle apes” have never had control over anything. They are insular depraved spastics. Their moronic “language” spreads like lice and ticks around the world without generating any brain-containing sense from it.
Let them taste the pure bare fist of those they have plundered and harmed in their stupid fucking face! Your arrogance will go to your heads and strangle you, and we all want that! Taylor is THE TOTAL BETRUG, absolutely useless in the fight against any threat!
Americans are and will remain as stupid as a piece of uncut white bread. Instead of “deporting” him miles away with a kick in the ass, they even bring flowers to this habitual liar’s grave, even though he hasn’t (finally!) died yet! What an embarrassing comedy!
And then his whole slimy baggage of ass-kissing satraps like this Greg Hood (pseudonym), who call themselves “nationalists” (you have to imagine that and let it melt in your mouth). These people are blatherers and utterly incapable of organized and coordinated action on the broadest basis!
The proof that this oh-so-godlike Taylor can get absolutely nothing done (apart from worthless annual “conferences”) is that he is talking exactly the same rubbish as he did 30 years ago. This stuffy, narrow-minded, provincial and self-absorbed brain is definitely “fanatically unrevolutionizable”!
Any idiot who thinks this pseudo-American is a national hero should spit with fervor! He changes nothing! And so that nothing changes at all, “Lord” Taylor was “installed”! Mr. Taylor denies that it is the Jews who condemn him to silence about the Jews!
Is he still dead? Has anyone checked?
The Left is really only against gentiles having control of resources. The Left is a political front for the Jews’ control of society.
The French having their own country. That’s ridiculous, that’s antisemitism, that’s a quaint outmoded concept! Leftists are there to terrorize anyone who speaks out against the Jews and their plan to destroy civilization. That is why the Left exists. No Jewish sponsorship, no Left. The Left is what the Jews define it to be. It has no substantial independent existence, when they use their “no true Scotsman” fallacy to say “they’re not Left, they’re not socialists” blah blah blah, the Left is only what the Jews want it to be, never anything else.
The Eastern Bloc, when it ceased to be of value to the Jews, was bound to collapse ideologically (although it seems some old Jews are still angry about that, when the Soviet Union existed there was massive reservoir of Communist sympathy among “the educated” in the USA!) But not before they moved the goalposts and started asserting that the old Communists were “Right-Wing”!
Off-topic posts like this should simply be deleted.
It has nothing to do with the article. It’s just someone’s greatest hits list of anti-right talking points.
Whites weren’t convinced, we became outbred – the opposite of inbred. Outbred people tend to be disloyal to themselves, their family, their country and their race.
Professor Edward Dutton, who is one of the few people talking about race genetics, says that Western Whites are, on average, 11th cousins. Eastern Whites, from Eastern Europe, on the other hand are 5th cousins. He says the ideal for genetic fitness is 3rd cousin.
That often happens — even with considerably more recent and prosaic figures.
Consider Lincoln. From the great Unionist to the great emancipator. Never mind what he actually said and did; he’s whoever we currently want him to be.