');
The Unz Review •ï¿½An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library •ï¿½B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


�Remember My InformationWhy?
�Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Alastair Crooke Anatoly Karlin Andrew Anglin Andrew Joyce Audacious Epigone Boyd D. Cathey C.J. Hopkins E. Michael Jones Eric Margolis Eric Striker Fred Reed Gilad Atzmon Godfree Roberts Gregory Hood Guillaume Durocher Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir James Kirkpatrick James Thompson Jared Taylor John Derbyshire Jonathan Cook Jung-Freud Karlin Community Kevin Barrett Kevin MacDonald Lance Welton Larry Romanoff Laurent Guyénot Linh Dinh Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Kersey Pepe Escobar Peter Frost Philip Giraldi Razib Khan Ron Unz Steve Sailer The Saker Tobias Langdon Trevor Lynch A. Graham A. J. Smuskiewicz A Southerner Academic Research Group UK Staff Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Agha Hussain Ahmad Al Khaled Ahmet Öncü Alain De Benoist Alan Macleod Albemarle Man Alex Graham Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alexander Jacob Alexander Wolfheze Alfred McCoy Alison Weir Allan Wall Allegra Harpootlian Amalric De Droevig Ambrose Kane Amr Abozeid Anand Gopal Anastasia Katz Andre Damon Andre Vltchek Andreas Canetti Andrei Martyanov Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andrew Hamilton Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Napolitano Andrew S. Fischer Andy Kroll Angie Saxon Ann Jones Anna Tolstoyevskaya Anne Wilson Smith Anonymous Anonymous American Anonymous Attorney Anonymous Occidental Anthony Boehm Anthony Bryan Anthony DiMaggio Tony Hall Antiwar Staff Antonius Aquinas Antony C. Black Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor AudaciousEpigone Augustin Goland Austen Layard Ava Muhammad Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Kissin Barry Lando Barton Cockey Beau Albrecht Belle Chesler Ben Fountain Ben Freeman Ben Sullivan Benjamin Villaroel Bernard M. Smith Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Blake Archer Williams Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Book Brad Griffin Bradley Moore Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brett Wilkins Brian Dew Brian McGlinchey Brian R. Wright Brittany Smith C.D. Corax Cara Marianna Carl Boggs Carl Horowitz Carolyn Yeager Cat McGuire Catherine Crump César Keller Chalmers Johnson Chanda Chisala Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlie O'Neill Charlottesville Survivor Chase Madar Chauke Stephan Filho Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Chris Woltermann Christian Appy Christophe Dolbeau Christopher DeGroot Christopher Donovan Christopher Ketcham Chuck Spinney Civus Non Nequissimus CODOH Editors Coleen Rowley Colin Liddell Cooper Sterling Craig Murray Cynthia Chung D.F. Mulder Dahr Jamail Dakota Witness Dan E. Phillips Dan Sanchez Daniel Barge Daniel McAdams Daniel Vinyard Danny Sjursen Dave Chambers Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Boyajian David Bromwich David Chibo David Chu David Gordon David Haggith David Irving David L. McNaron David Lorimer David Martin David North David Stockman David Vine David Walsh David William Pear David Yorkshire Dean Baker Declan Hayes Dennis Dale Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Diego Ramos Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Dmitriy Kalyagin Donald Thoresen Alan Sabrosky Dr. Ejaz Akram Dr. Ridgely Abdul Mu’min Muhammad Dries Van Langenhove Eamonn Fingleton Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Edward Curtin Edward Dutton Egbert Dijkstra Egor Kholmogorov Ekaterina Blinova Ellen Brown Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Emil Kirkegaard Emilio García Gómez Emma Goldman Enzo Porter Eric Draitser Eric Paulson Eric Peters Eric Rasmusen Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Gant Eugene Girin Eugene Kusmiak Eve Mykytyn F. Roger Devlin Fadi Abu Shammalah Fantine Gardinier Federale Fenster Fergus Hodgson Finian Cunningham The First Millennium Revisionist Fordham T. Smith Former Agent Forum Francis Goumain Frank Tipler Franklin Lamb Franklin Stahl Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Gary Corseri Gary Heavin Gary North Gary Younge Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Galloway George Koo George Mackenzie George Szamuely Georgianne Nienaber Gilbert Cavanaugh Gilbert Doctorow Giles Corey Glen K. Allen Glenn Greenwald A. Beaujean Agnostic Alex B. Amnestic Arcane Asher Bb Bbartlog Ben G Birch Barlow Canton ChairmanK Chrisg Coffee Mug Darth Quixote David David B David Boxenhorn DavidB Diana Dkane DMI Dobeln Duende Dylan Ericlien Fly Gcochran Godless Grady Herrick Jake & Kara Jason Collins Jason Malloy Jason�s Jeet Jemima Joel John Emerson John Quiggin JP Kele Kjmtchl Mark Martin Matoko Kusanagi Matt Matt McIntosh Michael Vassar Miko Ml Ole P-ter Piccolino Rosko Schizmatic Scorpius Suman TangoMan The Theresa Thorfinn Thrasymachus Wintz Gonzalo Lira Graham Seibert Grant M. Dahl Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Greg Klein Gregg Stanley Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Conte Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Gunnar Alfredsson Gustavo Arellano Hank Johnson Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Hans Vogel Harri Honkanen Heiner Rindermann Henry Cockburn Hewitt E. Moore Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Howe Abbot-Hiss Hubert Collins Hugh Kennedy Hugh McInnish Hugh Moriarty Hugo Dionísio Hunter DeRensis Hunter Wallace Huntley Haverstock Ian Fantom Igor Shafarevich Ira Chernus Ivan Kesić J. Alfred Powell J.B. Clark J.D. Gore J. Ricardo Martins Jacek Szela Jack Antonio Jack Dalton Jack Kerwick Jack Krak Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen Jake Bowyer James Bovard James Carroll James Carson Harrington James Chang James Dunphy James Durso James Edwards James Fulford James Gillespie James Hanna James J. O'Meara James K. Galbraith James Karlsson James Lawrence James Petras Jane Lazarre Jane Weir Janice Kortkamp Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Cannon Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jayant Bhandari JayMan Jean Bricmont Jean Marois Jean Ranc Jef Costello Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey D. Sachs Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jesse Mossman JHR Writers Jim Daniel Jim Fetzer Jim Goad Jim Kavanagh Jim Smith JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Dackman Joe Lauria Joel S. Hirschhorn Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Harrison Sims John Helmer John Hill John Huss John J. Mearsheimer John Jackson John Kiriakou John Macdonald John Morgan John Patterson John Leonard John Pilger John Q. Publius John Rand John Reid John Ryan John Scales Avery John Siman John Stauber John T. Kelly John Taylor John Titus John Tremain John V. Walsh John Wear John Williams Jon Else Jon Entine Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Revusky Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Sawyer Jonathan Schell Jordan Henderson Jordan Steiner Joseph Kay Joseph Kishore Joseph Sobran Josephus Tiberius Josh Neal Jeshurun Tsarfat Juan Cole Judith Coburn Julian Bradford Julian Macfarlane K.J. Noh Kacey Gunther Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Karl Haemers Karl Nemmersdorf Karl Thorburn Kees Van Der Pijl Keith Woods Kelley Vlahos Kenn Gividen Kenneth Vinther Kerry Bolton Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin Michael Grace Kevin Rothrock Kevin Sullivan Kevin Zeese Kshama Sawant Larry C. Johnson Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Lawrence Erickson Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Leonard C. Goodman Leonard R. Jaffee Liam Cosgrove Lidia Misnik Lilith Powell Linda Preston Lipton Matthews Liv Heide Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett Louis Farrakhan Lydia Brimelow M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maciej Pieczyński Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marco De Wit Marcus Alethia Marcus Apostate Marcus Cicero Marcus Devonshire Margaret Flowers Margot Metroland Marian Evans Mark Allen Mark Bratchikov-Pogrebisskiy Mark Crispin Miller Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Gullick Mark H. Gaffney Mark Lu Mark Perry Mark Weber Marshall Yeats Martin Jay Martin K. O'Toole Martin Webster Martin Witkerk Mary Phagan-Kean Matt Cockerill Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Caldwell Matthew Ehret Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max Jones Max North Max Parry Max West Maya Schenwar Merlin Miller Metallicman Michael A. Roberts Michael Averko Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Hoffman Michael Masterson Michael Quinn Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Michelle Malkin Miko Peled Mnar Muhawesh Moon Landing Skeptic Morgan Jones Morris V. De Camp Mr. Anti-Humbug Muhammed Abu Murray Polner N. Joseph Potts Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Nathan Cofnas Nathan Doyle Ned Stark Neil Kumar Nelson Rosit Nicholas R. Jeelvy Nicholas Stix Nick Griffin Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Nicolás Palacios Navarro Nils Van Der Vegte Noam Chomsky NOI Research Group Nomi Prins Norman Finkelstein Norman Solomon OldMicrobiologist Oliver Boyd-Barrett Oliver Williams Oscar Grau P.J. Collins Pádraic O'Bannon Patrice Greanville Patrick Armstrong Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Patrick Lawrence Patrick Martin Patrick McDermott Patrick Whittle Paul Bennett Paul Cochrane Paul De Rooij Paul Edwards Paul Engler Paul Gottfried Paul Larudee Paul Mitchell Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Paul Souvestre Paul Tripp Pedro De Alvarado Peter Baggins Ph.D. Peter Bradley Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Lee Peter Van Buren Philip Kraske Philip Weiss Pierre M. Sprey Pierre Simon Povl H. Riis-Knudsen Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Qasem Soleimani Rachel Marsden Raches Radhika Desai Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ralph Raico Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Ramzy Baroud Randy Shields Raul Diego Ray McGovern Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Reginald De Chantillon Rémi Tremblay Rev. Matthew Littlefield Ricardo Duchesne Richard Cook Richard Falk Richard Foley Richard Galustian Richard Houck Richard Hugus Richard Knight Richard Krushnic Richard McCulloch Richard Silverstein Richard Solomon Rick Shenkman Rick Sterling Rita Rozhkova Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Debrus Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Fisk Robert Hampton Robert Henderson Robert Inlakesh Robert LaFlamme Robert Lindsay Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Stark Robert Stevens Robert Trivers Robert Wallace Robert Weissberg Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Rolo Slavskiy Romana Rubeo Romanized Visigoth Ron Paul Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning RT Staff Ruuben Kaalep Ryan Andrews Ryan Dawson Sabri Öncü Salim Mansur Sam Dickson Sam Francis Sam Husseini Sayed Hasan Scot Olmstead Scott Howard Scott Ritter Servando Gonzalez Sharmine Narwani Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Sidney James Sietze Bosman Sigurd Kristensen Sinclair Jenkins Southfront Editor Spencer Davenport Spencer J. Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen F. Cohen Stephen J. Rossi Stephen J. Sniegoski Stephen Paul Foster Sterling Anderson Steve Fraser Steve Keen Steve Penfield Steven Farron Steven Yates Subhankar Banerjee Susan Southard Sydney Schanberg Talia Mullin Tanya Golash-Boza Taxi Taylor McClain Taylor Young Ted O'Keefe Ted Rall The Crew The Zman Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas A. Fudge Thomas Anderson Thomas Hales Thomas Dalton Thomas Ertl Thomas Frank Thomas Hales Thomas Jackson Thomas O. Meehan Thomas Steuben Thomas Zaja Thorsten J. Pattberg Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Timothy Vorgenss Timur Fomenko Tingba Muhammad Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Engelhardt Tom Mysiewicz Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Torin Murphy Tracy Rosenberg Travis LeBlanc Vernon Thorpe Virginia Dare Vito Klein Vladimir Brovkin Vladimir Putin Vladislav Krasnov Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walt King Walter E. Block Warren Balogh Washington Watcher Washington Watcher II Wayne Allensworth Wei Ling Chua Wesley Muhammad White Man Faculty Whitney Webb Wilhelm Kriessmann Wilhem Ivorsson Will Jones Will Offensicht William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Wyatt Peterson Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen Yaroslav Podvolotskiy Yvonne Lorenzo Zhores Medvedev
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2020 Election Academia American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Benjamin Netanyahu Black Crime Black Lives Matter Blacks Britain Censorship China China/America Conspiracy Theories Covid Culture/Society Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy Gaza Hamas History Holocaust Ideology Immigration IQ Iran Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Joe Biden NATO Nazi Germany Neocons Open Thread Political Correctness Race/Ethnicity Russia Science Syria Ukraine Vladimir Putin World War II 汪精衛 100% Jussie-free Content 1984 2008 Election 2012 Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2022 Election 2024 Election 23andMe 9/11 9/11 Commission Report Abortion Abraham Lincoln Abu Mehdi Muhandas Achievement Gap ACLU Acting White Adam Schiff Addiction ADL Admin Administration Admixture Adolf Hitler Advertising AfD Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Age Age Of Malthusian Industrialism Agriculture AI AIPAC Air Force Aircraft Carriers Airlines Airports Al Jazeera Al Qaeda Al-Shifa Alain Soral Alan Clemmons Alan Dershowitz Albania Albert Einstein Albion's Seed Alcoholism Alejandro Mayorkas Alex Jones Alexander Dugin Alexander Vindman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Alexei Navalny Algeria Ali Dawabsheh Alien And Sedition Acts Alison Nathan Alt Right Altruism Amazon Amazon.com America America First American Civil War American Dream American History American Indians American Israel Public Affairs Committee American Jews American Left American Nations American Nations American Presidents American Prisons American Renaissance Amerindians Amish Amnesty Amnesty International Amos Hochstein Amy Klobuchar Amygdala Anarchism Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Greece Ancient Rome Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Bacevich Andrew Sullivan Andrew Yang Anglo-America Anglo-imperialism Anglo-Saxons Anglos Anglosphere Angola Animal IQ Animal Rights Wackos Animals Ann Coulter Anne Frank Anthony Blinken Anthony Fauci Anthrax Anthropology Anti-Defamation League Anti-Gentilism Anti-Semites Anti-Vaccination Anti-Vaxx Anti-white Animus Antifa Antifeminism Antiracism Antisemitism Antisemitism Awareness Act Antisocial Behavior Antizionism Antony Blinken Apartheid Apartheid Israel Apollo's Ascent Appalachia Apple Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaeogenetics Archaeology Archaic DNA Architecture Arctic Arctic Sea Ice Melting Argentina Ariel Sharon Armageddon War Armenia Armenian Genocide Army Arnold Schwarzenegger Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Jensen Arthur Lichte Artificial Intelligence Arts/Letters Aryans Aryeh Lightstone Ash Carter Ashkenazi Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians Assassination Assassinations Assimilation Atheism Atlanta AUMF Auschwitz Australia Australian Aboriginals Autism Automation Avril Haines Ayn Rand Azerbaijan Azov Brigade Babes And Hunks Baby Gap Balfour Declaration Balkans Balochistan Baltics Baltimore Riots Banjamin Netanyahu Banking Industry Banking System Banks #BanTheADL Barack Obama Baseball Statistics Bashar Al-Assad Basketball #BasketOfDeplorables BBC BDS BDS Movement Beauty Beethoven Behavior Genetics Behavioral Genetics Bela Belarus Belgium Belgrade Embassy Bombing Ben Cardin Ben Hodges Ben Rhodes Ben Shapiro Ben Stiller Benny Gantz Bernard Henri-Levy Bernie Sanders Betsy DeVos Betty McCollum Bezalel Smotrich Bezalel Yoel Smotrich Biden BigPost Bilateral Relations Bilingual Education Bill Clinton Bill De Blasio Bill Gates Bill Kristol Bill Maher Bill Of Rights Billionaires Billy Graham Bioethics Biology Bioweapons Birmingham Birth Rate Bitcoin Black Community Black History Month Black Muslims Black Panthers Black People Black Slavery BlackLivesMatter BlackRock Blake Masters Blank Slatism BLM Blog Blogging Blogosphere Blond Hair Blood Libel Blue Eyes Boasian Anthropology Boeing Boers Bolshevik Revolution Bolshevik Russia Books Boomers Border Wall Boris Johnson Bosnia Boycott Divest And Sanction Brain Drain Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Bret Stephens Brett McGurk Bretton Woods Brexit Brezhnev Bri Brian Mast BRICs Brighter Brains British Empire British Labour Party British Politics Buddhism Build The Wall Bulldog Bush Business Byzantine Caitlin Johnstone California Californication Camp Of The Saints Canada #Cancel2022WorldCupinQatar Cancer Candace Owens Capitalism Carl Von Clausewitz Carlos Slim Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Cars Carthaginians Catalonia Catholic Church Catholicism Catholics Cats Caucasus CDC Ceasefire Cecil Rhodes Census Central Asia Central Intelligence Agency Chanda Chisala Chaos And Order Charles De Gaulle Charles Manson Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charlie Hebdo Charlottesville Checheniest Chechen Of Them All Chechens Chechnya Chernobyl Chetty Chicago Chicagoization Chicken Hut Child Abuse Children Chile China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese IQ Chinese Language Christian Zionists Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Christopher Wray Chuck Schumer CIA Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil Rights Movement Civil War Civilization Clannishness Clash Of Civilizations Class Classical Antiquity Classical History Classical Music Clayton County Climate Climate Change Clint Eastwood Clintons Coal Coalition Of The Fringes Cognitive Elitism Cognitive Science Cold Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Powell Colin Woodard College Admission College Football Colonialism Color Revolution Columbia University Columbus Comic Books Communism Computers Confederacy Confederate Flag Congress Conquistador-American Conservatism Conservative Movement Conservatives Conspiracy Theory Constantinople Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumerism Controversial Book Convergence Core Article Cornel West Corona Corporatism Corruption COTW Counterpunch Country Music Cousin Marriage Cover Story COVID-19 Craig Murray Creationism Crime Crimea Crispr Critical Race Theory Cruise Missiles Crusades Crying Among The Farmland Cryptocurrency Ctrl-Left Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckery Cuckservatism Cuckservative CUFI Cuisine Cultural Marxism Cultural Revolution Culture Culture War Curfew Czars Czech Republic DACA Daily Data Dump Dallas Shooting Damnatio Memoriae Dan Bilzarian Danny Danon Daren Acemoglu Darwinism Darya Dugina Data Data Analysis Dave Chappelle David Bazelon David Brog David Friedman David Frum David Irving David Lynch David Petraeus Davide Piffer Davos Death Of The West Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Deborah Lipstadt Debt Debt Jubilee Decadence Deep State Deficits Degeneracy Democracy Democratic Party Demograhics Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denmark Dennis Ross Department Of Homeland Security Deplatforming Derek Chauvin Detroit Development Dick Cheney Diet Digital Yuan Dinesh D'Souza Discrimination Disease Disinformation Disney Disparate Impact Dissent Dissidence Diversity Diversity Before Diversity Diversity Pokemon Points Divorce DNA Dogs Dollar Domestic Surveillance Domestic Terrorism Doomsday Clock Dostoevsky Doug Emhoff Doug Feith Dresden Drone War Drones Drug Laws Drugs Duterte Dysgenic Dystopia E. Michael Jones E. O. Wilson East Asia East Asian Exception East Asians East Turkestan Eastern Europe Ebrahim Raisi Economic Development Economic History Economic Sanctions Economy Ecuador Edmund Burke Edmund Burke Foundation Education Edward Snowden Effective Altruism Effortpost Efraim Zurofff Egor Kholmogorov Egypt Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2020 Election Fraud Elections Electric Cars Eli Rosenbaum Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elise Stefanik Elites Elizabeth Holmes Elizabeth Warren Elliot Abrams Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emmanuel Macron Emmett Till Employment Energy England Entertainment Environment Environmentalism Epidemiology Equality Erdogan Eretz Israel Eric Zemmour Ernest Hemingway Espionage Espionage Act Estonia Ethics Ethics And Morals Ethiopia Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity Ethnocentricty EU Eugene Debs Eugenics Eurabia Eurasia Euro Europe European Genetics European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Genetics Evolutionary Psychology Existential Risks Eye Color Face Shape Facebook Faces Fake News False Flag Attack Family Family Systems Fantasy FARA Farmers Fascism Fast Food FBI FDA FDD Federal Reserve Feminism Ferguson Ferguson Shooting Fermi Paradox Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates FIFA Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Finland Finn Baiting Finns First Amendment FISA Fitness Flash Mobs Flight From White Floyd Riots 2020 Fluctuarius Argenteus Flynn Effect Food Football For Fun Forecasts Foreign Agents Registration Act Foreign Policy Fourth Amendment Fox News France Francesca Albanese Frank Salter Frankfurt School Franklin D. Roosevelt Franz Boas Fraud Freakonomics Fred Kagan Free Market Free Speech Free Trade Freedom Of Speech Freedom French Revolution Friedrich Karl Berger Friends Of The Israel Defense Forces Frivolty Frontlash Furkan Dogan Future Futurism G20 Gambling Game Game Of Thrones Gavin McInnes Gavin Newsom Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians GDP Gen Z Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Equality Gender Reassignment Gene-Culture Coevolution Genealogy General Intelligence General Motors Generation Z Generational Gap Genes Genetic Diversity Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Genghis Khan Genocide Genocide Convention Genomics Gentrification Geography Geopolitics George Floyd George Galloway George Patton George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush Georgia Germans Germany Ghislaine Maxwell Gilad Atzmon Gina Peddy Giorgia Meloni Gladwell Glenn Greenwald Global Warming Globalism Globalization Globo-Homo God Gold Golf Gonzalo Lira Google Government Government Debt Government Overreach Government Spending Government Surveillance Government Waste Goyim Grant Smith Graphs Great Bifurcation Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Powers Great Replacement #GreatWhiteDefendantPrivilege Greece Greeks Greg Cochran Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Greta Thunberg Grooming Group Intelligence Group Selection GSS Guardian Guest Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns Guy Swan GWAS Gypsies H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Haiti Hajnal Line Halloween HammerHate Hannibal Procedure Happening Happiness Harvard Harvard University Harvey Weinstein Hassan Nasrallah Hate Crimes Fraud Hoax Hate Hoaxes Hate Speech Hbd Hbd Chick Health Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Hegira Height Henry Harpending Henry Kissinger Hereditary Heredity Heritability Hezbollah High Speed Rail Hillary Clinton Hindu Caste System Hindus Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanics Historical Genetics History Of Science Hitler HIV/AIDS Hoax Holland Hollywood Holocaust Denial Holocaust Deniers Holy Roman Empire Homelessness Homicide Homicide Rate Homomania Homosexuality Hong Kong Houellebecq Housing Houthis Howard Kohr Huawei Hubbert's Peak Huddled Masses Huey Newton Hug Thug Human Achievement Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Evolutionary Genetics Human Evolutionary Genomics Human Genetics Human Genomics Human Rights Human Rights Watch Humor Hungary Hunt For The Great White Defendant Hunter Biden Hunter-Gatherers I.F. Stone I.Q. I.Q. Genomics #IBelieveInHavenMonahan ICC Icj Ideas Identity Ideology And Worldview IDF Idiocracy Igbo Igor Shafarevich Ilan Pappe Ilhan Omar Illegal Immigration Ilyushin IMF Impeachment Imperialism Imran Awan Inbreeding Income India Indian IQ Indians Individualism Indo-Europeans Indonesia Inequality Inflation Intelligence Intelligence Agencies Intelligent Design International International Affairs International Comparisons International Court Of Justice International Criminal Court International Relations Internet Interracial Marriage Interracism Intersectionality Intifada Intra-Racism Intraracism Invade Invite In Hock Invade The World Invite The World Iosef Stalin Iosif Stalin Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iranian Nuclear Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Irish Is Love Colorblind Isaac Herzog ISIS Islam Islamic Jihad Islamic State Islamism Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Bonds Israel Defense Force Israel Defense Forces Israel Separation Wall Israeli Occupation IT Italy Itamar Ben-Gvir It's Okay To Be White Ivanka Ivy League J Street Jacky Rosen Jair Bolsonaro Jake Sullivan Jake Tapper Jamal Khashoggi James Angleton James B. Watson James Clapper James Comey James Forrestal James Jeffrey James Mattis James Watson Janet Yellen Janice Yellen Japan Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Greenblatt JASTA JCPOA JD Vance Jeb Bush Jeffrey Epstein Jeffrey Goldberg Jeffrey Sachs Jen Psaki Jennifer Rubin Jens Stoltenberg Jeremy Corbyn Jerry Seinfeld Jerusalem Jerusalem Post Jesuits Jesus Jesus Christ Jewish Genetics Jewish History Jewish Intellectuals Jewish Power Jewish Power Party Jewish Supremacism JFK Assassination JFK Jr. Jihadis Jill Stein Jimmy Carter Jingoism JINSA Joe Lieberman Joe Rogan John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John F. Kennedy John Hagee John Hawks John Kirby John Kiriakou John McCain John McLaughlin John Mearsheimer Joker Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Greenblatt Jonathan Pollard Jordan Peterson Joseph Kennedy Joseph McCarthy Josh Gottheimer Josh Paul Journalism Judaism Judea Judge George Daniels Judicial System Julian Assange Jussie Smollett Justice Justin Trudeau Kaboom Kahanists Kaiser Wilhelm Kamala Harris Kamala On Her Knees Kanye West Karabakh War 2020 Karen Kwiatkowski Karine Jean-Pierre Kashmir Kata'ib Hezbollah Kay Bailey Hutchison Kazakhstan Keir Starmer Kenneth Marcus Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Williamson Khazars Khrushchev Kids Kim Jong Un Kinship Kkk KKKrazy Glue Of The Coalition Of The Fringes Knesset Kompromat Korea Korean War Kosovo Kris Kobach Kristi Noem Ku Klux Klan Kubrick Kurds Kushner Foundation Kyle Rittenhouse Kyrie Irving Language Laos Larry C. Johnson Late Obama Age Collapse Latin America Latinos Laura Loomer Law Lawfare LDNR Lead Poisoning Leahy Amendments Leahy Law Lebanon Lee Kuan Yew Leftism Lenin Leo Frank Leo Strauss Let's Talk About My Hair LGBT LGBTI Liberal Opposition Liberal Whites Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libya Light Skin Preference Lindsey Graham Linguistics Literacy Literature Lithuania Litvinenko Living Standards Liz Cheney Liz Truss Lloyd Austin Localism long-range-missile-defense Longevity Looting Lord Of The Rings Lorde Loudoun County Louis Farrakhan Love And Marriage Low-fat Lukashenko Lula Lyndon B Johnson Lyndon Johnson Madeleine Albright Mafia MAGA Magnitsky Act Malaysia Malaysian Airlines MH17 Manosphere Manufacturing Mao Zedong Map Marco Rubio Maria Butina Marijuana Marine Le Pen Marjorie Taylor Greene Mark Milley Mark Steyn Mark Warner Marriage Martin Luther King Martin Scorsese Marvel Marx Marxism Masculinity Mass Shootings Mate Choice Mathematics Mathilde Krim Matt Gaetz Max Boot Max Weber Maxine Waters Mayans McCain McCain/POW McDonald's Meat Media Media Bias Medicine Medieval Christianity Medieval Russia Mediterranean Diet Medvedev Megan McCain Meghan Markle Mein Obama MEK Mel Gibson Men With Gold Chains Meng Wanzhou Mental Health Mental Illness Mental Traits Meritocracy Merkel Merkel Youth Merkel's Boner Merrick Garland Mexico MH 17 MI-6 Michael Bloomberg Michael Collins PIper Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Michael Jackson Michael Lind Michael McFaul Michael Moore Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michelle Goldberg Michelle Ma Belle Michelle Obama Microaggressions Middle Ages Middle East Migration Mike Huckabee Mike Johnson Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mike Waltz Mikhael Gorbachev Miles Mathis Militarized Police Military Military Analysis Military Budget Military History Military Spending Military Technology Millennials Milner Group Minimum Wage Minneapolis Minorities Miriam Adelson Miscellaneous Misdreavus Mishima Missile Defense Mitch McConnell Mitt Romney Mixed-Race MK-Ultra Mohammed Bin Salman Monarchy Mondoweiss Money Mongolia Mongols Monkeypox Monogamy Moon Landing Hoax Moon Landings Moore's Law Morality Mormonism Mormons Mortality Mortgage Moscow Mossad Movies Muhammad Multiculturalism Music Muslim Ban Muslims Mussolini NAEP Naftali Bennett Nakba NAMs Nancy Pelos Nancy Pelosi Narendra Modi NASA Nation Of Hate Nation Of Islam National Assessment Of Educational Progress National Debt National Endowment For Democracy National Review National Security Strategy National Socialism National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans Natural Gas Nature Vs. Nurture Navalny Affair Navy Standards Nazis Nazism Neandertals Neanderthals Near Abroad Negrolatry Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolibs Neolithic Neoreaction Netherlands Never Again Education Act New Cold War New Dark Age New Horizon Foundation New Orleans New Silk Road New Tes New World Order New York New York City New York Times New Zealand New Zealand Shooting NFL Nicholas II Nicholas Wade Nick Eberstadt Nick Fuentes Nicolas Maduro Niger Nigeria Nike Nikki Haley NIMBY Nina Jankowicz No Fly Zone Noam Chomsky Nobel Prize Nord Stream Nord Stream Pipelines Nordics Norman Braman Norman Finkelstein Norman Lear North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway Novorossiya NSA Nuclear Power Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Nuremberg Nutrition NYPD Obama Obama Presidency Obamacare Obesity Obituary Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Wall Street October Surprise Oedipus Complex OFAC Oil Oil Industry Oklahoma City Bombing Olav Scholz Old Testament Oliver Stone Olympics Open Borders OpenThread Opinion Poll Opioids Orban Organized Crime Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Orwell Osama Bin Laden OTFI Our Soldiers Speak Out Of Africa Model Paganism Pakistan Pakistani Paleoanthropology Paleocons Palestine Palestinians Palin Panhandling Papacy Paper Review Parasite Burden Parenting Parenting Paris Attacks Partly Inbred Extended Family Pat Buchanan Pathogens Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Findley Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Durov Pavel Grudinin Paypal Peace Peak Oil Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Pentagon Personal Genomics Personality Pete Buttgieg Pete Buttigieg Pete Hegseth Peter Frost Peter Thiel Peter Turchin Petro Poroshenko Pew Phil Rushton Philadelphia Philippines Philosophy Phoenicians Phyllis Randall Physiognomy Piers Morgan Pigmentation Pigs Pioneers Piracy PISA Pizzagate POC Ascendancy Podcast Poland Police Police State Polio Political Correctness Makes You Stupid Political Dissolution Political Economy Politicians Politics Polling Pollution Polygamy Polygyny Pope Francis Population Population Genetics Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Porn Pornography Portland Portugal Portuguese Post-Apocalypse Poverty Power Pramila Jayapal PRC Prediction Prescription Drugs President Joe Biden Presidential Race '08 Presidential Race '12 Presidential Race '16 Presidential Race '20 Prince Andrew Prince Harry Priti Patel Privacy Privatization Progressives Propaganda Prostitution protest Protestantism Proud Boys Psychology Psychometrics Psychopathy Public Health Public Schools Puerto Rico Puritans Putin Putin Derangement Syndrome QAnon Qassem Soleimani Qatar Quantitative Genetics Quebec Quiet Skies Quincy Institute R2P Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race/IQ Race Riots Rachel Corrie Racial Purism Racial Reality Racialism Racism Rafah Raj Shah Rand Paul Randy Fine Rap Music Rape Rashida Tlaib Rationality Ray McGovern Raymond Chandler Razib Khan Real Estate RealWorld Recep Tayyip Erdogan Red Sea Refugee Crisis #refugeeswelcome Religion Religion And Philosophy Rentier Reparations Reprint Republican Party Republicans Review Revisionism Rex Tillerson RFK Assassination Ricci Richard Dawkins Richard Goldberg Richard Grenell Richard Haas Richard Haass Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Rightwing Cinema Riots R/k Theory RMAX Robert A. Heinlein Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Ford Robert Kagan Robert Kraft Robert Maxwell Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert O'Brien Robert Reich Robots Rock Music Roe Vs. Wade Roger Waters Rolling Stone Roman Empire Romania Romanticism Rome Ron DeSantis Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rotherham Rothschilds RT International Rudy Giuliani Rush Limbaugh Russiagate Russian Demography Russian Elections 2018 Russian History Russian Media Russian Military Russian Nationalism Russian Occupation Government Russian Orthodox Church Russian Reaction Russians Russophobes Russophobia Russotriumph Ruth Bader Ginsburg Rwanda Sabrina Rubin Erdely Sacha Baron Cohen Sacklers Sailer Strategy Sailer's First Law Of Female Journalism Saint Peter Tear Down This Gate! Saint-Petersburg Salman Rushie Salt Sam Bankman-Fried Sam Francis Samantha Power Samson Option San Bernadino Massacre Sandra Beleza Sandy Hook Sapir-Whorf SAT Satanic Age Satanism Saudi Arabia Scandal Science Denialism Science Fiction Scooter Libby Scotland Scott Ritter Scrabble Sean Hannity Seattle Secession Select Post Self Determination Self Indulgence Semites Serbia Sergei Lavrov Sergei Skripal Sergey Glazyev Seth Rich Sex Sex Differences Sex Ratio At Birth Sexual Harassment Sexual Selection Sexuality Seymour Hersh Shai Masot Shakespeare Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Shared Environment Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shimon Peres Shireen Abu Akleh Shmuley Boteach Shoah Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shulamit Aloni Shurat HaDin Sigal Mandelker Sigar Pearl Mandelker Sigmund Freud Silicon Valley Singapore Single Men Single Women Sinotriumph Six Day War Sixties SJWs Skin Color Slavery Slavery Reparations Slavoj Zizek Slavs Smart Fraction Social Justice Warriors Social Media Social Science Socialism Society Sociobiology Sociology Sodium Solzhenitsyn Somalia Sotomayor South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea Southeast Asia Soviet History Soviet Union Sovok Space Space Exploration Space Program Spain Spanish Spanish River High School SPLC Sport Sports Srebrenica St Petersburg International Economic Forum Stabby Somali Staffan Stage Stalinism Standardized Tests Star Trek Star Wars Starvation Comparisons State Department Statistics Statue Of Liberty Steny Hoyer Stephen Cohen Stephen Colbert Stephen Harper Stephen Jay Gould Stephen Townsend Stereotypes Steroids Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steven Pinker Strait Of Hormuz Strategic Ambiguity Stuart Levey Stuart Seldowitz Student Debt Stuff White People Like Sub-replacement Fertility Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subhas Chandra Bose Subprime Mortgage Crisis Suburb Suella Braverman Sugar Suicide Superintelligence Supreme Court Susan Glasser Svidomy Sweden Switzerland Symington Amendment Syrian Civil War Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Take Action Taliban Talmud Tatars Taxation Taxes Tea Party Technical Considerations Technology Ted Cruz Telegram Television Terrorism Terrorists Terry McAuliffe Tesla Testing Testosterone Tests Texas THAAD Thailand The 10/7 Project The AK The American Conservative The Bell Curve The Bible The Black Autumn The Cathedral The Confederacy The Constitution The Eight Banditos The Family The Free World The Great Awokening The Left The Middle East The New York Times The South The States The Zeroth Amendment To The Constitution Theranos Theresa May Third World Thomas Jefferson Thomas Moorer Thought Crimes Tiananmen Massacre Tiger Mom TikTok TIMSS Tom Cotton Tom Massie Tom Wolfe Tony Blair Tony Blinken Tony Kleinfeld Too Many White People Torture Trade Trans Fat Trans Fats Transgender Transgenderism Transhumanism Translation Translations Transportation Travel Trayvon Martin Trolling True Redneck Stereotypes Trump Trump Derangement Syndrome Trust Tsarist Russia Tucker Carlson Tulsa Tulsi Gabbard Turkey Turks TWA 800 Twins Twitter Ucla UFOs UK Ukrainian Crisis UN Security Council Unbearable Whiteness Unemployment Unions United Kingdom United Nations United Nations General Assembly United Nations Security Council United States Universal Basic Income UNRWA Urbanization Ursula Von Der Leyen Uruguay US Blacks US Capitol Storming 2021 US Civil War II US Constitution US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 US Regionalism USA USAID USS Liberty USSR Uyghurs Uzbekistan Vaccination Vaccines Valdimir Putin Valerie Plame Vdare Venezuela Vibrancy Victoria Nuland Victorian England Video Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Vikings Viktor Orban Viktor Yanukovych Violence Vioxx Virginia Virginia Israel Advisory Board Vitamin D Vivek Ramaswamy Vladimir Zelensky Volodymur Zelenskyy Volodymyr Zelensky Vote Fraud Voter Fraud Voting Rights Voting Rights Act Vulcan Society Wall Street Walmart Wang Ching Wei Wang Jingwei War War Crimes War Guilt War In Donbass War On Christmas War On Terror War Powers War Powers Act Warhammer Washington DC WASPs Watergate Wealth Wealth Inequality Wealthy Web Traffic Weight WEIRDO Welfare Wendy Sherman West Bank Western Decline Western European Marriage Pattern Western Hypocrisy Western Media Western Religion Western Revival Westerns White America White Americans White Death White Flight White Guilt White Helmets White Liberals White Man's Burden White Nakba White Nationalism White Nationalists White People White Privilege White Slavery White Supremacy White Teachers Whiterpeople Whites Who Whom Whoopi Goldberg Wikileaks Wikipedia William Browder William F. Buckley William Kristol William Latson William McGonagle William McRaven WINEP Winston Churchill WMD Woke Capital Women Woodrow Wilson Workers Working Class World Bank World Economic Forum World Health Organization World Population World Values Survey World War G World War H World War Hair World War I World War III World War R World War T World War Weed WTF WVS WWII Xi Jinping Xinjiang Yahya Sinwar Yair Lapid Yemen Yevgeny Prigozhin Yoav Gallant Yogi Berra's Restaurant Yoram Hazony YouTube Yugoslavia Yuval Noah Harari Zbigniew Brzezinski Zimbabwe Zionism Zionists Zvika Fogel
Nothing found
All Commenters •ï¿½My
Comments
•ï¿½Followed
Commenters
�⇅All / On "Chinese"
    Late in the evening earlier this month I stood at the heart of the campus of one of America’s great universities, marveling at the generosity of the American business community in building and rebuilding so extensively. Then I noticed that all the young people I saw around were Chinese. After further inspection some Indians and...
  • @Patrick Cleburne
    @anyone with a brain

    You really must remember to take your meds.

    Replies: @Nuria

    did you? hopefully.

  • Eric135 says:
    May 31, 2024 at 9:33 am GMT •ï¿½100 Words

    Poem circulating on the internet in 2002 (Chinese accent added):

    I come fol visit, get tleated legal
    So I stay, who cale I irregar?
    I closs boldel, pool and bloke
    Take bus, see emproyment fork,
    Nice man tleat me good in thele
    Say I need to see werfale
    Werfale say you come no mole
    We send cash light to youl dool
    Werfale checks, they make you wearthy
    Medicaid, it keep you hearthy
    By and by, got prenty money
    Thanks to you, Amelican dummy
    We have hobby – it’s carred bleeding
    Werfale pay for baby feeding
    Kids need dentist? Wife need pirrs?
    We get flee! We get no birrs
    Amelican clazy, pay arr yeal
    To keep the werfale lunning hele
    We think Amelica daln good prace
    Too daln good fol the white man lace
    If they no rike us, they can go
    Got rots of loom in Mexico

  • @anonymous
    @Altai4

    You're making a huge jump with the comparison to Jewish supremacy which is unique in this world. I think China will eventually have a GDP of two times the US GDP with weak soft power outside of Asia. China is going to be the main country in Asia but won't come close to ruling the world. They may actually become one of the major forces in the world helping keep Jewish supremacy in check.

    Replies: @man

    If you never heard of Chinese Jews, start digging please.

  • anonymous[187] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:
    May 29, 2024 at 4:31 pm GMT •ï¿½100 Words
    @Altai4
    The other thing about the Chinese is that they like the Jews today and various other times the Germans and British have a superiority complex and even thought themselves the core of the world with the outside being full of "barbarians".

    So far we have never seen a country which is so large by population (Only superseded by fractious India), has a massive ethnic diaspora all over the world and which has deep in it's psyche an idea of being the supreme master race also being the most powerful country in the world.

    Right now in 2024 the Chinese are slowly banning education in non-Mandarin languages, particularly Tibetan in an effort to extinguish them.

    Libertarians like to think envy of the poor and weak is what makes the world go round but in truth it's the contempt of the rich and powerful.

    What happens when China finally gets over it's complex about it's idea of being the supreme people, burned down with the Summer Palace and finds itself the richest and most powerful country in the world with massive ethnic diasporas across the world? Current Chinese leaders, humbled by memories of a very different recent past of China may say and even believe one thing. But what happens when the children who have known nothing but Chinese greatest come to power?

    Will we all become Tibetans too?

    I'm reminded of the hilariously-titled paper from the Pentagon.

    THE STRATEGIC CONSEQUENCES OF CHINESE RACISM: A Strategic Asymmetry for the United States

    Replies: @xyzxy, @JR Foley, @anonymous

    You’re making a huge jump with the comparison to Jewish supremacy which is unique in this world. I think China will eventually have a GDP of two times the US GDP with weak soft power outside of Asia. China is going to be the main country in Asia but won’t come close to ruling the world. They may actually become one of the major forces in the world helping keep Jewish supremacy in check.

    •ï¿½Replies: @man
    @anonymous

    If you never heard of Chinese Jews, start digging please.
  • xyzxy says:
    May 29, 2024 at 11:45 am GMT •ï¿½400 Words

    Many of Pat’s articles are an over the top (or possibly under the bottom) aggregate of half-news. Allegations based on loaded words that really don’t represent the situation. But that’s how emotionally based propaganda works.

    For example, the overseas ‘secret Chinese police stations’ the media has been touting every now and then. Pat’s link is from Phelim Kine of Politico and Human Rights Watch. Yet closer investigation shows that they are not ‘police stations’ in any sense of the term, as anyone who takes the time to think about it would on their own realize. Yet these people use the word ‘police station’ not to clarify, but rather to obfuscate, because they know that the idea of a secret police station has a certain nefarious connotation.

    It would be more accurate to think of them in the sense of an NGO, which are very common operations financed by the US government in order to influence (to the point of inciting ‘color revolutions’) in foreign countries. Now, one can (and should) be against the entire concept of NGOs. But that is not what is going on here. In any case, the subterfuge of these ‘secret police stations’ is pretty benign compared to Western NGOs and their actual foreign intrigue. However, unlike Paul Harvey, Pat won’t tell you ‘the rest of the story’.

    Then there is the implied idea that Chinese infiltrators are ‘military aged men’ who could be (and likely are) getting together to form a secret paramilitary group in order to… well, to what? This is sort of left up in the air. Kind of implies hordes of Yellow Peril Manson-esque Dune Buggy Attack Battalions coming over the hills in SoCal.

    Certainly there should be no illegal invaders south of the border. But there is no political will to stop it. Why is that? Because our politicians are more concerned about supporting Jewish concerns: Israel today, but over the last couple of years it has been the Jew Zelensky. And why are politicians more interested in the ever expanding borders of Israel, and the receding borders of the Ukraine?

    Pat should write about that. I’m sure by the time it filters through his inked quill it will be because of ACPAC, the American-China Political Affairs Committee. You know, that group of Chinese billionaires who control both parties, and are passing anti-Sinitism laws, making it illegal to criticize both China and Chinese.

  • @anyone with a brain
    @yaml

    The author is trying to stoke up anti-China sentiment on behalf of the Jews. Whose crimes are lengthy and well known. Sick people

    Replies: @JR Foley

    Mainland China —target goal for 2028 —80,000,000 Engineers.

  • @Altai4
    The other thing about the Chinese is that they like the Jews today and various other times the Germans and British have a superiority complex and even thought themselves the core of the world with the outside being full of "barbarians".

    So far we have never seen a country which is so large by population (Only superseded by fractious India), has a massive ethnic diaspora all over the world and which has deep in it's psyche an idea of being the supreme master race also being the most powerful country in the world.

    Right now in 2024 the Chinese are slowly banning education in non-Mandarin languages, particularly Tibetan in an effort to extinguish them.

    Libertarians like to think envy of the poor and weak is what makes the world go round but in truth it's the contempt of the rich and powerful.

    What happens when China finally gets over it's complex about it's idea of being the supreme people, burned down with the Summer Palace and finds itself the richest and most powerful country in the world with massive ethnic diasporas across the world? Current Chinese leaders, humbled by memories of a very different recent past of China may say and even believe one thing. But what happens when the children who have known nothing but Chinese greatest come to power?

    Will we all become Tibetans too?

    I'm reminded of the hilariously-titled paper from the Pentagon.

    THE STRATEGIC CONSEQUENCES OF CHINESE RACISM: A Strategic Asymmetry for the United States

    Replies: @xyzxy, @JR Foley, @anonymous

    This article is complete and unadulterated “Bullshit”

  • man says:
    May 29, 2024 at 6:01 am GMT •ï¿½100 Words

    The plan is to make US the communist state of China, with its social credit system, and all the other goodies as a benefit to us, reeducation camps, labor camps, or good enough for body parts. With 1.4 billion who cares about few millions. That system works so well , it is an envy of many new age politicians, Look at Australia, how quickly they have build an isolation camps for people who resisted covid lock downs. We have them everywhere ready , do you remember a list of CCP party members released few years ago by Chinese whistleblower,“Communist party branches have been set up inside western companies, allowing the infiltration of those companies by CCP members – who, if called on, are answerable directly to the communist party, to the Chairman, the president himself,†she said.

  • @yaml
    I am not getting what the author wants to say. This post is not addressed to the author at all, rather to the people who read comments. The author does not want illegal chinese immigration. That much is clear. Does he want legal chinese immigration? Does he want legal or illegal immigration originating from elsewhere? Or does he want the USA to remain a cocoon to descendants of pre-independence european settlers or of pre ww2 european settlers or of only anglo-saxon settlers or pre 1970 settlers. Is he a white? jew? black? mixed? japanese? indian? Is he super rich? rich? salaried? unemployed? propertied? Why is not he saying anything about the stranglehold the 0.01% and the jewish lobby and the three letter agencies has over US policy, discourse and future? Also general apathy of the general population and proclivity to the easy life?

    I am also surprised by this phenom. If they are trying to migrate in this way, why not go to europe? France is the most accepting from what I have heard. For someone to hazard such perils, they obviously would have to believe that they are going to get a better life than at home. I do not know for a fact, but hazard my guess that pay is not very high in china, but so are the living expenses less in china. Plus state healthcare services are great. Even so, the competition to the top is tough what with all the competitors intelligent and hardworking. Also on the flipside it is very hard to find a bride to start a family. Also I read about some "lying flat" movement in china.

    What lies in the future for these travelers? A job? No job? welfare handouts? good looking demonesses(majority?) for a wife? Costly living expenses and healthcare? I dont see the point of it. Is it trading one shithole for another shithole? Or trading the boring certainty and security of a pleb-like existence for the dangerous uncertainty?

    Commentators kindly illuminate.

    Replies: @anyone with a brain

    The author is trying to stoke up anti-China sentiment on behalf of the Jews. Whose crimes are lengthy and well known. Sick people

    •ï¿½Replies: @JR Foley
    @anyone with a brain

    Mainland China ---target goal for 2028 ---80,000,000 Engineers.
  • @xyzxy

    Late in the evening earlier this month I stood at the heart of the campus of one of America’s great universities, marveling at...
    �
    Let me guess, Pat. You were marveling at the efficacy and ability of Jews to get university presidents to call the cops on students who were upset that Israel, with the help of America, was killing Palestinian women and children, left and right. Did I get that right?

    Actually you should be happy about the influx of Chinese. Because with China now our public enemy number one (next on the war list right after Russia), perhaps Congress will finally take some initiative over our south of the border invasion. I mean, if it was just folks from Central America, who would care? But with illegal Chinese getting ready to 'build an Army' in the US...

    But here's the thing, Pat. Send all the Chinese, Mexicans, Haitians, Venezuelans..., plus all the rest back to where they came from. And you know what? The rot will continue. Why? Because they are not the cause of the problem, but only the effect. If you want to get back to the 'historic American nation' you always talk about, then you have to get to the root of the problem, which is subversive Jewish influence. If you are not talking about that, you are just not talking.

    And speaking of... are Jews part of your 'historic America nation'? Or did they arrive later, after the fact?

    One thing you are right about, though. It's a total disgrace how Chinese are subverting America, especially buying up all our politicians. I mean, as soon as one is elected they make the pilgrimage, donning a palace eunich hat and kowtowing at the Great Wall of China, in order to pledge allegiance to the Chinese Communists.

    Replies: @Richard B

    Great comment! Thanks! I do like reading Patrick and James Kilkpatrick, et al., but facts are facts, and you stated some of the most important ones very well.

  • The great race replacement. Organized by Jews. Aimed at whites.

  • yaml says:
    May 28, 2024 at 8:57 pm GMT •ï¿½300 Words

    I am not getting what the author wants to say. This post is not addressed to the author at all, rather to the people who read comments. The author does not want illegal chinese immigration. That much is clear. Does he want legal chinese immigration? Does he want legal or illegal immigration originating from elsewhere? Or does he want the USA to remain a cocoon to descendants of pre-independence european settlers or of pre ww2 european settlers or of only anglo-saxon settlers or pre 1970 settlers. Is he a white? jew? black? mixed? japanese? indian? Is he super rich? rich? salaried? unemployed? propertied? Why is not he saying anything about the stranglehold the 0.01% and the jewish lobby and the three letter agencies has over US policy, discourse and future? Also general apathy of the general population and proclivity to the easy life?

    I am also surprised by this phenom. If they are trying to migrate in this way, why not go to europe? France is the most accepting from what I have heard. For someone to hazard such perils, they obviously would have to believe that they are going to get a better life than at home. I do not know for a fact, but hazard my guess that pay is not very high in china, but so are the living expenses less in china. Plus state healthcare services are great. Even so, the competition to the top is tough what with all the competitors intelligent and hardworking. Also on the flipside it is very hard to find a bride to start a family. Also I read about some “lying flat” movement in china.

    What lies in the future for these travelers? A job? No job? welfare handouts? good looking demonesses(majority?) for a wife? Costly living expenses and healthcare? I dont see the point of it. Is it trading one shithole for another shithole? Or trading the boring certainty and security of a pleb-like existence for the dangerous uncertainty?

    Commentators kindly illuminate.

    •ï¿½Replies: @anyone with a brain
    @yaml

    The author is trying to stoke up anti-China sentiment on behalf of the Jews. Whose crimes are lengthy and well known. Sick people

    Replies: @JR Foley
  • They’ll be welcomed as liberators.

  • @anyone with a brain
    This article proves that VDARE is kike-controlled crap

    Replies: @Patrick Cleburne

    You really must remember to take your meds.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Nuria
    @Patrick Cleburne

    did you? hopefully.
  • xyzxy says:
    May 28, 2024 at 6:02 pm GMT •ï¿½300 Words

    Late in the evening earlier this month I stood at the heart of the campus of one of America’s great universities, marveling at…

    Let me guess, Pat. You were marveling at the efficacy and ability of Jews to get university presidents to call the cops on students who were upset that Israel, with the help of America, was killing Palestinian women and children, left and right. Did I get that right?

    Actually you should be happy about the influx of Chinese. Because with China now our public enemy number one (next on the war list right after Russia), perhaps Congress will finally take some initiative over our south of the border invasion. I mean, if it was just folks from Central America, who would care? But with illegal Chinese getting ready to ‘build an Army’ in the US…

    But here’s the thing, Pat. Send all the Chinese, Mexicans, Haitians, Venezuelans…, plus all the rest back to where they came from. And you know what? The rot will continue. Why? Because they are not the cause of the problem, but only the effect. If you want to get back to the ‘historic American nation’ you always talk about, then you have to get to the root of the problem, which is subversive Jewish influence. If you are not talking about that, you are just not talking.

    And speaking of… are Jews part of your ‘historic America nation’? Or did they arrive later, after the fact?

    One thing you are right about, though. It’s a total disgrace how Chinese are subverting America, especially buying up all our politicians. I mean, as soon as one is elected they make the pilgrimage, donning a palace eunich hat and kowtowing at the Great Wall of China, in order to pledge allegiance to the Chinese Communists.

    •ï¿½Thanks: anyone with a brain
    •ï¿½Replies: @Richard B
    @xyzxy

    Great comment! Thanks! I do like reading Patrick and James Kilkpatrick, et al., but facts are facts, and you stated some of the most important ones very well.
  • xyzxy says:
    May 28, 2024 at 5:29 pm GMT •ï¿½300 Words
    @Altai4
    The other thing about the Chinese is that they like the Jews today and various other times the Germans and British have a superiority complex and even thought themselves the core of the world with the outside being full of "barbarians".

    So far we have never seen a country which is so large by population (Only superseded by fractious India), has a massive ethnic diaspora all over the world and which has deep in it's psyche an idea of being the supreme master race also being the most powerful country in the world.

    Right now in 2024 the Chinese are slowly banning education in non-Mandarin languages, particularly Tibetan in an effort to extinguish them.

    Libertarians like to think envy of the poor and weak is what makes the world go round but in truth it's the contempt of the rich and powerful.

    What happens when China finally gets over it's complex about it's idea of being the supreme people, burned down with the Summer Palace and finds itself the richest and most powerful country in the world with massive ethnic diasporas across the world? Current Chinese leaders, humbled by memories of a very different recent past of China may say and even believe one thing. But what happens when the children who have known nothing but Chinese greatest come to power?

    Will we all become Tibetans too?

    I'm reminded of the hilariously-titled paper from the Pentagon.

    THE STRATEGIC CONSEQUENCES OF CHINESE RACISM: A Strategic Asymmetry for the United States

    Replies: @xyzxy, @JR Foley, @anonymous

    Right now in 2024 the Chinese are slowly banning education in non-Mandarin languages, particularly Tibetan in an effort to extinguish them.

    Schools in Tibet are actually tri-lingual, with Tibetan, Mandarin, and English courses. What you are referring to is a national policy mandating education primarily in Mandarin, as a means of fostering not only national unity, but recognizing the reality and necessity of understanding the nation’s primary language.

    Get away from the Radio Free Asia/BBC/Tibet Watch mode, and think about this for a moment using the US as a reference. In the US there has been much ink spilt over bilingual education, with most ‘conservatives’ arguing that bilingual education fosters disunity, cultural fragmentation, and poorly serves students who must eventually be expected to work within an English system.

    With a push for multilingual education we instead find students unable to cope with the functional demands that higher education is supposed to correct for. Also, we have enclaves where English is not spoken at all, a situation leading to social disunity among our unfortunately diverse populations.

    China is attempting to remedy this problem, by first recognizing that Mandarin is the official language, and second that in order to prosper within China as Chinese, citizens must be proficient in that language.

    China has the correct idea, whereas in the US, because of a lack of standardized language policy, we have a situation where not only education, but business and government is conducted in multiple languages, to no one’s real benefit. Press 1 for English, etc.

    •ï¿½Agree: JR Foley
  • Solutions says: •ï¿½Website
    May 28, 2024 at 2:26 pm GMT •ï¿½200 Words

    “American plutocrats, overconfident in their ability to protect their own progeny, scoff at this concern. Ultimately, when ethnocentrism bites, their descendants will curse them.”
    You speak the actual truth.
    I take it that our treacherous elite do actually believe that somehow they and their posterity will be able to leap frog the destruction that they have meticulously orchestrated. Are they delusional in thinking they can control the outcomes of their treasonous actions, or are they miserable psychopaths who enjoy destroying anything of value, or both.
    When Western life has boiled down to one of smiling predators preying on one another for a bigger slice of the pie, is it really a mystery that those who have clawed their way to the top of the heap behave in such a way. They simply project their own self-hatred and their betrayal of all the is good onto those all around them whom they judge as the same as themselves.

  • This article proves that VDARE is kike-controlled crap

    •ï¿½Replies: @Patrick Cleburne
    @anyone with a brain

    You really must remember to take your meds.

    Replies: @Nuria
  • Sir John Glubb was right.

  • Altai4 says:
    May 28, 2024 at 10:21 am GMT •ï¿½200 Words

    The other thing about the Chinese is that they like the Jews today and various other times the Germans and British have a superiority complex and even thought themselves the core of the world with the outside being full of “barbarians”.

    So far we have never seen a country which is so large by population (Only superseded by fractious India), has a massive ethnic diaspora all over the world and which has deep in it’s psyche an idea of being the supreme master race also being the most powerful country in the world.

    Right now in 2024 the Chinese are slowly banning education in non-Mandarin languages, particularly Tibetan in an effort to extinguish them.

    Libertarians like to think envy of the poor and weak is what makes the world go round but in truth it’s the contempt of the rich and powerful.

    What happens when China finally gets over it’s complex about it’s idea of being the supreme people, burned down with the Summer Palace and finds itself the richest and most powerful country in the world with massive ethnic diasporas across the world? Current Chinese leaders, humbled by memories of a very different recent past of China may say and even believe one thing. But what happens when the children who have known nothing but Chinese greatest come to power?

    Will we all become Tibetans too?

    I’m reminded of the hilariously-titled paper from the Pentagon.

    THE STRATEGIC CONSEQUENCES OF CHINESE RACISM: A Strategic Asymmetry for the United States

    •ï¿½Replies: @xyzxy
    @Altai4


    Right now in 2024 the Chinese are slowly banning education in non-Mandarin languages, particularly Tibetan in an effort to extinguish them.

    �
    Schools in Tibet are actually tri-lingual, with Tibetan, Mandarin, and English courses. What you are referring to is a national policy mandating education primarily in Mandarin, as a means of fostering not only national unity, but recognizing the reality and necessity of understanding the nation's primary language.

    Get away from the Radio Free Asia/BBC/Tibet Watch mode, and think about this for a moment using the US as a reference. In the US there has been much ink spilt over bilingual education, with most 'conservatives' arguing that bilingual education fosters disunity, cultural fragmentation, and poorly serves students who must eventually be expected to work within an English system.

    With a push for multilingual education we instead find students unable to cope with the functional demands that higher education is supposed to correct for. Also, we have enclaves where English is not spoken at all, a situation leading to social disunity among our unfortunately diverse populations.

    China is attempting to remedy this problem, by first recognizing that Mandarin is the official language, and second that in order to prosper within China as Chinese, citizens must be proficient in that language.

    China has the correct idea, whereas in the US, because of a lack of standardized language policy, we have a situation where not only education, but business and government is conducted in multiple languages, to no one's real benefit. Press 1 for English, etc.
    , @JR Foley
    @Altai4

    This article is complete and unadulterated "Bullshit"
    , @anonymous
    @Altai4

    You're making a huge jump with the comparison to Jewish supremacy which is unique in this world. I think China will eventually have a GDP of two times the US GDP with weak soft power outside of Asia. China is going to be the main country in Asia but won't come close to ruling the world. They may actually become one of the major forces in the world helping keep Jewish supremacy in check.

    Replies: @man
  • Lee Kuan Yew, Singapore’s founding father and long-time prime minister (1959–1990), should be a role model for nationalists across the West. Lee was not a philosopher but a practical politician, so his insights are not theoretical but the product of three decades of leadership. Lee was able to adapt to changing circumstances, eliminate Communist threats,...
  • @littlereddot
    @bombthe3gorgesdam

    You win! You can have Tocharia.

    Just leave the Americas, Australia and New Zealand to the rightful owners ok?

    Replies: @acementhead

    New Zealand can not be left to “the rightful owners” because they, the Moriori, were exterminated by the Maoris.

  • Earlier: Chinese IQ Is Real, But So Is Their Thousand-Year Tradition Of Exam Cheating The dissident quantitative genetic analyst Emil Kirkegaard posted to his website Just Emil Kirkegaard Things what I think is his most consequential paper yet: OpenPsych is a website established by Kirkegaard and a colleague in 2014 to carry academic-quality papers which...
  • The question for me (since it is the very nut-cuttin’ issue of our day), is Emil Kirkegaard jew-wise?

    If not, reading him is hardly worth one’s time if actually trying to understand the root of our problems.

  • @Vergissmeinnicht
    @Realist

    Right. I am not a "realist" (got it?), but a purist – I don't believe "The enemy of my enemy is my friend".

    Replies: @Realist

    I don’t believe “The enemy of my enemy is my friend”.

    I agree it is not always true…but sometimes it is.

  • @drmanchild
    @Godfree Roberts

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AynNsPs9i80 This guy opened my eyes a bit. I've never been to China but have known a broad sample of native Chinese in college, business and personally and have found they are more prone to cheating and short-cuts than whites. As a poster said above, many of us who root for China only do so because, as much as we don't know about China, we do know the truth about the USA.

    Replies: @Godfree Roberts

    The guy in the video is a well-known fraud. https://youtu.be/GRqcA04FtmM

    Video Link

    China’s stats are solid. There is no evidence in any court, foreign or domestic, to support the fact that China or the Chinese are less honest than us.

  • anon[371] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:
    July 28, 2023 at 8:49 pm GMT •ï¿½200 Words

    “If Kirkegaard has really uncovered such a massive systemic taint in the Chinese, then the whole U.S. relationship with China needs to be carefully reconsidered.”

    walking through Copley Square one fine,sunny afternoon , I felt a hand in my pocket. When I looked around, there was a chink beside me who quickly pulled his hand out & smirked & sneered, “oh, sorry” & then melted into the crowd. I don’t know how many other pockets he picked that day(or since) but I wouldn’t trust a chink as far as I could kick an opium pipe. Go to any Chinatown district in America & most of the slave laborers in the chink restaurants are illegal immigrants. America now is slowly filling with Asian illegals & if Asian students ( both American born & foreign) take most of the top spots in fast-track colleges here after the SCOTUS decision, then the Yellow Peril will conquer America within two generations. Watch your wallets.

  • Ferrari says:
    July 28, 2023 at 8:15 pm GMT •ï¿½100 Words
    @Patrick Cleburne
    @Ferrari

    OF COURSE, such an interesting study should be repeatedly replicated, on a much larger scale. Also with more countries, notably Korea, Japan and Taiwan.

    That it apparently has not been is doubtless due to the turpitude of modern Academic institutions. They are absolutey not interested in investigating any link between honesty and ethnicity, much less in risking offending the munificant Chinese.

    This is no reason to ignore the study, which raises very important issues.

    To do so would be cowardly and unscientific.

    Replies: @Ferrari

    Well sure you can you ignore it, but you should be very skeptical of such a result in a field with such a poor track record of consistency.

    For instance, stealing a wallet is a crime. And all crime rates will have positive correlations with other crimes. China’s homicide rate is very very low, this is well known. Hence China probably also has a low robbery rate. So we can fairly safely assume those wallets on the ground are not getting stolen — they are probably just getting left on the ground most of the time.

    The idea that China should be grouped in with notoriously high crime countries like Peru, Kenya, or Ghana is laughable.

    So is this result even worth reporting as “lack of honesty”. No.

    •ï¿½Agree: Godfree Roberts
  • @Realist
    @Vergissmeinnicht

    I think you live in a dream world.

    Replies: @Vergissmeinnicht

    Right. I am not a “realist” (got it?), but a purist – I don’t believe “The enemy of my enemy is my friend”.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Realist
    @Vergissmeinnicht


    I don't believe "The enemy of my enemy is my friend".
    �
    I agree it is not always true...but sometimes it is.
  • @Vergissmeinnicht
    @Realist

    When Greg Johnson published why White Nationalists should support Ukraine not Russia¹ (which I totally agree with), one of the arguments he had to refute: Russia's ideology is closer to ours than Western ideology, thererefore we must support Putin – NO! Under Liberal Democracy, us dissidents can organise, spread our ideas etc., all in all, we're left alone; under Putin's régime, rather, it's hitty-missy… we can be thrown in jail (or worse), even.

    So, similarly… Does the USA oppress its people? Yes, certainly. But less so than China.

    1. I am unable to locate Greg's article(s) on Counter-Currents.com right now.
    .
    .
    .

    Kinda unrelated ‘fun fact’ […]
    �
    Erratum: Kinda related 'fun fact' […]

    Replies: @Realist

    I think you live in a dream world.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Vergissmeinnicht
    @Realist

    Right. I am not a "realist" (got it?), but a purist – I don't believe "The enemy of my enemy is my friend".

    Replies: @Realist
  • @Godfree Roberts

    Maybe, but this Chinese development is devastating. I cannot believe that Kirkegaard is serious about the effect of Communism. Several countries much higher up the list experienced Communist rule for as long or much longer. The Chinese are in fact behaving like a totally different species.
    �
    Where have you been since Kirkegaard's culturally tone-deaf, -dumb and -blind paper was published? It was much derided by Chinese, who explained what they would do in such cases–and none would 'hand it in' to anyone but the local beat cop.
    In any case, China is a high-trust society and also highly trustworthy. Though it dominates world science, only one of the top 20 science fraudsters is Chinese, and he was from Taiwan. Nor has there ever been a case in any court against China for stealing significant IP. Nor has the PRC ever told a lie or broken a promise.. But you know all that.
    https://i.imgur.com/PCJiYmV.png

    China evolved in almost total isolation from the West for thousands of years, never producing a political system more sophisticated than a despotism. It did however produce a culture of amoral familism in which honest dealings with outsiders had no part.
    �
    Dear me. China has never had a political system because it's never had politics in the sense we think of them. China has had by far the best governance system on earth for 2,000 years: the same one they have today. But you knew that, too.
    https://i.imgur.com/EdH9tMs.png

    Replies: @That Would Be Telling, @Patrick Cleburne, @Pizzastand, @drmanchild


    Video LinkThis guy opened my eyes a bit. I’ve never been to China but have known a broad sample of native Chinese in college, business and personally and have found they are more prone to cheating and short-cuts than whites. As a poster said above, many of us who root for China only do so because, as much as we don’t know about China, we do know the truth about the USA.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Godfree Roberts
    @drmanchild

    The guy in the video is a well-known fraud. https://youtu.be/GRqcA04FtmM

    China's stats are solid. There is no evidence in any court, foreign or domestic, to support the fact that China or the Chinese are less honest than us.
  • July 28, 2023 at 3:09 am GMT •ï¿½1,000 Words
    @Godfree Roberts

    Maybe, but this Chinese development is devastating. I cannot believe that Kirkegaard is serious about the effect of Communism. Several countries much higher up the list experienced Communist rule for as long or much longer. The Chinese are in fact behaving like a totally different species.
    �
    Where have you been since Kirkegaard's culturally tone-deaf, -dumb and -blind paper was published? It was much derided by Chinese, who explained what they would do in such cases–and none would 'hand it in' to anyone but the local beat cop.
    In any case, China is a high-trust society and also highly trustworthy. Though it dominates world science, only one of the top 20 science fraudsters is Chinese, and he was from Taiwan. Nor has there ever been a case in any court against China for stealing significant IP. Nor has the PRC ever told a lie or broken a promise.. But you know all that.
    https://i.imgur.com/PCJiYmV.png

    China evolved in almost total isolation from the West for thousands of years, never producing a political system more sophisticated than a despotism. It did however produce a culture of amoral familism in which honest dealings with outsiders had no part.
    �
    Dear me. China has never had a political system because it's never had politics in the sense we think of them. China has had by far the best governance system on earth for 2,000 years: the same one they have today. But you knew that, too.
    https://i.imgur.com/EdH9tMs.png

    Replies: @That Would Be Telling, @Patrick Cleburne, @Pizzastand, @drmanchild

    Actually, Dr. Roberts, China did develop a political system beyond mere governance; politics and political systems being defined by the use and distribution of power. And in this sense, China’s system cannot be accurately defined as despotic, at least in the strict use of the term; nor was it unsophisticated, as is implied by the OP. Quite the opposite. Indeed, one of its underlying philosophies, Mohist consequentialism, is described by the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy as “the world’s earliest form of consequentialism, a remarkably sophisticated version based on a plurality of intrinsic goods taken as constitutive of collective human welfare.” Basically the state defined progress in terms of the collective, which perhaps forms a link to its modern communist outlook.

    Two aspects of China’s well-developed political system are relevant here: First, the Mandate of Heaven assigns the task of governance to the one who will serve the people. Mencius, perhaps the greatest Confucian (after Confucius himself), famously said, “Heaven does not create the people for the sake of the Sovereign; Heaven creates the Sovereign for the sake of the people.” Confucian and even Legalist scholars since those times (few centuries BC) stated repeatedly that the purpose and focus of the ruler and officials was to determine the interests of the people so that the state could fulfill them. For Confucians, this was to be achieved through ren, which can variously be defined as benevolence, magnanimity, kindess; for Legalists, this was to be attained through strict rules and codes. Whatever the means, the aim was to serve and care for the people to produce harmony in the State. This places serious constraints on the use and formulation of power: the ruler cannot simply do as he pleases and impose his will on the people. Contrast this with the Divine Right of Kings that defined political systems and power in much of Europe until the modern era. Indeed, it was relatively common for Chinese emperors to issue written apologies to the people, read by criers, while in Europe, in the rare instance that kings apologized, they only ever did so to the Pope. Apologizing to the people was simply beneath the aristocracy.

    But in China, the legitimacy of rule rested squarely on the king or emperor’s ability to serve the common people. Conversely, he is not a legitimate ruler–and loses his Mandate–if the people’s welfare suffers and especially if they are abused or mistreated. The Heavens would reveal the loss of Mandate through natural disasters or, more commonly, popular rebellions which would lead to the transfer of power, i.e., the change of Mandate. Practically speaking, this is an early form of consent of governed. While, yes, the rationale is rooted in ancient Chinese cosmology, in practice it takes human action–popular uprisings and rebellion–to replace a ruler. Importantly, the cosmology attaches meaning to rebellion: it is key to the change of power that leads to the restoration of the State.

    The second piece is China’s longstanding meritocracy, institutionalized in a battery of written exams that have been administered regularly for some 1,400 years. In theory, any male could sit for the exams and, provided he passed, was then eligible for any number of political appointments that could lead to more powerful and lucrative positions. In practice, then as now, wealthier families had an edge because they could pay tutors to instruct their sons. But the fact remained that there was a well-defined means by which those without wealth or connections could attain those things and rise up in society. So, those with modest means could save some money, splurge on tutoring for their more promising sons, and hope for the best. Now, contrast this with most other places in the world (including Europe) which were run by aristocracies up until early in the last century. The idea that a serf or pauper could become a high official was laughable. Yet Europeans warmed to the idea of a meritocracy, beginning with Britain in the 1850s when colonial officials proposed an exam-based system modeled on China’s to select officials to run the Empire.

    The key is that China’s system produced a huge, entrenched political class that directly controlled everyday affairs and policy. True, it was filled with many self-interested bureaucrats and often inefficient, but this provided a powerful counterbalance to central authority, namely the emperor and his court: A would-be autocrat was essentially stymied by red tape. And, of course, by the ever-present fear of uprisings that might signal the loss of his Mandate.

    One more thing: As mentioned above, China’s system has a longstanding focus on collective welfare, which may link it to the communism of today. Perhaps when Kierkegaard refers to communism to explain the behavior of Chinese workers in his study, he is also referring to this strong sense of the collective, with a concomitantly weak sense of the individual–and individual property. Thus, while I am not entirely convinced with his explanation, I think it is plausible. Someone raised in a staunch collectivist or communist setting, when presented with a small sum, might be more likely than an American or Mexican to feel like they have just as much a right to it as anyone else–including the owner. Given the basement level wages in China, it might be even more tempting to make this rationalization. Any remaining qualms might be settled by noting that the wallet’s owner likely won’t be hurt much by this loss: the government, being communist, heavily subsidizes all expenses and essentially puts a roof over everyone’s head no matter their station. Again, this does not justify what amounts to theft, but helps explain why such a pattern might be more likely in communist societies.

    [Dr. Roberts, I know none of this is news to you, and I’m not saying that for effect. I’ve written this to help inform the rest, who generally know little about your field of expertise, China.]

    •ï¿½Thanks: Godfree Roberts
  • @Richard B

    By the 18th century, independent scholars did the most important research and science…the “uncredentialed†independent scientist is rising again.
    �
    Of course! This is something I've commented on for years, including more recent comments here at TUR.

    European culture was created by people who today would be classed as amateurs.
    Kant, for example, was the first professional philosopher, and there were hardly any professional scientists until late in the 19th century. From an historical perspective professionalism as we think of it today is something fairly recent, and has been anything but a mixed blessing.

    But the amateurs did not think of themselves as "scholars", and the average professional scholar was an object of mockery for Nietzsche, and not just Nietzsche. With rare exception they're still objects of mockery (exactly because genuine scholarship is exceptional, ie; rare).

    The amatuteur of the past had a good deal of the even older tradition of the virtuoso, the man who collected and studied in any area that moved him. These were the men responsible for the assembly of important materials for scholarship and science (the real kind of both that used to be practiced).

    Darwin himself was, by today's standards, an amateur naturalist of a very traditional English sort.

    In fact, not only was the amateur-virtuosos tradition so vital in the life of Goethe, but he used that as the model for his Faust. And, it's highly relevent today, and so worth pointing out, that Goethe was inspired in part to write that masterpiece in response to his ultimate rejection of the Illuminati (to which he belonged to for a time), the secret organization started by Weishaupt that would eventually become Supremacy Inc.

    One could argue that the amateur-virtuoso tradition is to Eurpean culture what fake scholarship is to Supremacy Inc. Meaning, the amateur-virtuoso tradition, a bequeath of European culture at its best, is the answer to the fake scholarship used by the hostile elite in its attempt to destroy the West and replace it with barbarism. Far from being something to sneer at, amateurization is something for the public to respect and for the elite to fear.

    Replies: @baythoven

    Richard B — I thought your #5. comment brilliant, then I read this one which I appreciate even more. Off-the-charts interesting! Thank you.

    •ï¿½Thanks: Richard B
  • The issue is no more than nonsense when the only race that has been able to develop dishonesty in all its splendor has been the white race and the other races have only been accomplices or extras in the lack of ethics and principles of the whites in all human activities.
    Maybe not all, and there may be a sample of one to five percent who are not victims of racism and greed may be, but no more than that.

  • @Ferrari
    Have similar results been reproduced anywhere else? If not, I wouldn't take this too seriously.

    Psychology is well known to have a study replication problem. As high as 50% of studies could not be reproduced in some areas of focus in Psychology as little as 10 years ago.

    My guess is China is more middle of the pack in reality. But there are other viewpoints of criticism as well:

    China has 1.4 billion people, so one might question the sample size they used as well. Looking at the study, I see they average around 400 observations per country. In a country of 1.4 billion that seems wholly inadequate. Hell in a country like the United States of 330 million that makes little sense.

    Furthermore, the study only looks at reporting rates. So many people probably just look at the wallet and DON'T steal, but also don't turn it in. The morality of not turning it in is not what this author pretends it to be, ie negative. In fact, one can make a very reasonable case that the best case is simply to leave the wallet where it was left, so that the person who left it can return and find it more easily.

    In a society that is highly group oriented like china, its certainly possible the wallet is just left there and never stolen and the owner can easily find it later on in the same spot they left it.

    Replies: @Patrick Cleburne

    OF COURSE, such an interesting study should be repeatedly replicated, on a much larger scale. Also with more countries, notably Korea, Japan and Taiwan.

    That it apparently has not been is doubtless due to the turpitude of modern Academic institutions. They are absolutey not interested in investigating any link between honesty and ethnicity, much less in risking offending the munificant Chinese.

    This is no reason to ignore the study, which raises very important issues.

    To do so would be cowardly and unscientific.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Ferrari
    @Patrick Cleburne

    Well sure you can you ignore it, but you should be very skeptical of such a result in a field with such a poor track record of consistency.

    For instance, stealing a wallet is a crime. And all crime rates will have positive correlations with other crimes. China's homicide rate is very very low, this is well known. Hence China probably also has a low robbery rate. So we can fairly safely assume those wallets on the ground are not getting stolen -- they are probably just getting left on the ground most of the time.

    The idea that China should be grouped in with notoriously high crime countries like Peru, Kenya, or Ghana is laughable.

    So is this result even worth reporting as "lack of honesty". No.
  • Godfree Roberts says: •ï¿½Website
    @Patrick Cleburne
    @Godfree Roberts

    Was this paper published anywhere before being posted on OpenPsych on July 17? If not, too soon for a considered response. Verbal abuse though is cheap
    .
    Cases of Chinese IP theft are legion: https://vdare.com/posts/red-chinese-spies-another-benefit-of-immigration

    "Nor has the PRC ever told a lie or broken a promise." EVER? Is this a joke? What about the promise to the Peasants that they would get their own land after the war with the KMT in the late '40s? Followed by exceptionally bloody collectivization.

    Your distinction between Governance and a Political system is interesting. But the central virtue of the systems in the West is having a way to transfer power without having a costly civil war. China has not been exempt from the problems this causes and may never be.

    Of course, it now seems 21C America may not be either.

    Replies: @Godfree Roberts

    Was this paper published anywhere before being posted on OpenPsych on July 17? If not, too soon for a considered response. Verbal abuse though is cheap

    What paper and what verbal abuse are you referring to?
    .

    Cases of Chinese IP theft are legion: https://vdare.com/posts/red-chinese-spies-another-benefit-of-immigration

    . Like 99% of such ‘cases,’ they are allegations only.

    “Nor has the PRC ever told a lie or broken a promise.†EVER? Is this a joke? What about the promise to the Peasants that they would get their own land after the war with the KMT in the late ’40s? Followed by exceptionally bloody collectivization.

    Ever. It has never lied. The peasants got their land and still have it. Collectivization was not bloody partly because it was entirely voluntary. Even at its peak, only 40% of villages had fully collectivized, and some rejected the idea completely.

    Your distinction between Governance and a Political system is interesting. But the central virtue of the systems in the West is having a way to transfer power without having a costly civil war. China has not been exempt from the problems this causes and may never be.

    The PRC has been transferring power peacefully since its founding and has not experienced the political violence – assassinations, etc. – we see in the USA.
    The US is a young country run by an anonymous oligarchy unresponsive to citizens’ desires. [Gilens and Page, ‘The central point of our research is that economic elites and organized business interests have substantial independent impacts on US government policy, while mass-based interest groups and average citizens have little or no independent influence’. https://tinyurl.com/yc3mvrxh%5D.
    The oligarchy does not transfer power. It just changes frontmen every four years.
    The next elections will test our ability to transfer power peacefully.

  • @That Would Be Telling
    @Godfree Roberts

    Nope, the PRC is infamous for bogus scientific papers, so much so there are entire fields like protein crystallography where the serious scientists in the field completely ignore their output. We also see how such claimed scientific prowess does not, in fact, translate into things like military jet engines competitive with Russian ones, let alone those further West.

    Now, the papers issue is not one we can judge the authors on too harshly, indeed because Communism. The CCP doesn't understand science and has set up a regime of paper quotas for scientists, publish or perish is almost literally true.

    If you want to do good social science on all this, you need to use Taiwan as a control which was not done here. Which of course says nothing about foreign policy et. al., but the idea you can "do business" with unrepentant Communists is utterly fatuous, especially after our century of experience in trying to do this (depending in part on the current leadership, but also across multiple Communist regimes).

    Let me mention all the suspicions we have about the current "Biden" "engagement" with Xi/the CCP, for example "Why America’s Elites are Dedicated to Engagement with Communist China" while noting at minimum the US Deep State has factions, some of which are going after the PRC with a rusty knife. In particular crushing their aspirations to make anywhere near modern chips, especially economically.

    Replies: @Godfree Roberts

    the PRC is infamous for bogus scientific papers??

    The PRC is infamous for everything, if we are to believe Western media.

    As I said, it leads the world in research quality, quantity and scope, and has never stolen IP.

    •ï¿½Troll: That Would Be Telling
  • @Realist
    @Vergissmeinnicht


    The Chinese Gov’t oppresses its people.
    �
    So does the United States.

    Replies: @Vergissmeinnicht, @Vergissmeinnicht

    ‘Freedom’ and ‘Tyranny’ are relative concepts: even anarcho-capitalists don’t believe in “gun rights” for the man who collects Hydrogen Bombs…

    Source: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/713665896

    (Well, in the paper above, Prof Block technically says you are allowed to own an H Bomb if you live on Mars…)

  • @Realist
    @Vergissmeinnicht


    The Chinese Gov’t oppresses its people.
    �
    So does the United States.

    Replies: @Vergissmeinnicht, @Vergissmeinnicht

    When Greg Johnson published why White Nationalists should support Ukraine not Russia¹ (which I totally agree with), one of the arguments he had to refute: Russia’s ideology is closer to ours than Western ideology, thererefore we must support Putin – NO! Under Liberal Democracy, us dissidents can organise, spread our ideas etc., all in all, we’re left alone; under Putin’s régime, rather, it’s hitty-missy… we can be thrown in jail (or worse), even.

    So, similarly… Does the USA oppress its people? Yes, certainly. But less so than China.

    1. I am unable to locate Greg’s article(s) on Counter-Currents.com right now.
    .
    .
    .

    Kinda unrelated ‘fun fact’ […]

    Erratum: Kinda related ‘fun fact’ […]

    •ï¿½Replies: @Realist
    @Vergissmeinnicht

    I think you live in a dream world.

    Replies: @Vergissmeinnicht
  • Ferrari says:
    July 27, 2023 at 9:58 pm GMT •ï¿½200 Words

    Have similar results been reproduced anywhere else? If not, I wouldn’t take this too seriously.

    Psychology is well known to have a study replication problem. As high as 50% of studies could not be reproduced in some areas of focus in Psychology as little as 10 years ago.

    My guess is China is more middle of the pack in reality. But there are other viewpoints of criticism as well:

    China has 1.4 billion people, so one might question the sample size they used as well. Looking at the study, I see they average around 400 observations per country. In a country of 1.4 billion that seems wholly inadequate. Hell in a country like the United States of 330 million that makes little sense.

    Furthermore, the study only looks at reporting rates. So many people probably just look at the wallet and DON’T steal, but also don’t turn it in. The morality of not turning it in is not what this author pretends it to be, ie negative. In fact, one can make a very reasonable case that the best case is simply to leave the wallet where it was left, so that the person who left it can return and find it more easily.

    In a society that is highly group oriented like china, its certainly possible the wallet is just left there and never stolen and the owner can easily find it later on in the same spot they left it.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Patrick Cleburne
    @Ferrari

    OF COURSE, such an interesting study should be repeatedly replicated, on a much larger scale. Also with more countries, notably Korea, Japan and Taiwan.

    That it apparently has not been is doubtless due to the turpitude of modern Academic institutions. They are absolutey not interested in investigating any link between honesty and ethnicity, much less in risking offending the munificant Chinese.

    This is no reason to ignore the study, which raises very important issues.

    To do so would be cowardly and unscientific.

    Replies: @Ferrari
  • @Vergissmeinnicht
    @Realist

    The Chinese Gov't oppresses its people. The Chinese are smart enough to have Freedom and Democracy. (At least, in manners à la South Koreans and Japanese.)

    Look, I'm a Cultural Particularist: Dictators, Autocrats, Fascism etc. can work and maybe even are the best ways to govern some peoples – who are inbred, collectivistic and/or low-IQ…
    .
    .
    .

    Kinda unrelated 'fun fact': consumption of alcohol may increase CORRUPTION.

    Here's: https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/475

    Replies: @Realist

    The Chinese Gov’t oppresses its people.

    So does the United States.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Vergissmeinnicht
    @Realist

    When Greg Johnson published why White Nationalists should support Ukraine not Russia¹ (which I totally agree with), one of the arguments he had to refute: Russia's ideology is closer to ours than Western ideology, thererefore we must support Putin – NO! Under Liberal Democracy, us dissidents can organise, spread our ideas etc., all in all, we're left alone; under Putin's régime, rather, it's hitty-missy… we can be thrown in jail (or worse), even.

    So, similarly… Does the USA oppress its people? Yes, certainly. But less so than China.

    1. I am unable to locate Greg's article(s) on Counter-Currents.com right now.
    .
    .
    .

    Kinda unrelated ‘fun fact’ […]
    �
    Erratum: Kinda related 'fun fact' […]

    Replies: @Realist
    , @Vergissmeinnicht
    @Realist

    'Freedom' and 'Tyranny' are relative concepts: even anarcho-capitalists don't believe in "gun rights" for the man who collects Hydrogen Bombs…

    Source: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/713665896

    (Well, in the paper above, Prof Block technically says you are allowed to own an H Bomb if you live on Mars…)
  • Patrick Cleburne says: •ï¿½Website
    July 27, 2023 at 8:15 pm GMT •ï¿½100 Words
    @Godfree Roberts

    Maybe, but this Chinese development is devastating. I cannot believe that Kirkegaard is serious about the effect of Communism. Several countries much higher up the list experienced Communist rule for as long or much longer. The Chinese are in fact behaving like a totally different species.
    �
    Where have you been since Kirkegaard's culturally tone-deaf, -dumb and -blind paper was published? It was much derided by Chinese, who explained what they would do in such cases–and none would 'hand it in' to anyone but the local beat cop.
    In any case, China is a high-trust society and also highly trustworthy. Though it dominates world science, only one of the top 20 science fraudsters is Chinese, and he was from Taiwan. Nor has there ever been a case in any court against China for stealing significant IP. Nor has the PRC ever told a lie or broken a promise.. But you know all that.
    https://i.imgur.com/PCJiYmV.png

    China evolved in almost total isolation from the West for thousands of years, never producing a political system more sophisticated than a despotism. It did however produce a culture of amoral familism in which honest dealings with outsiders had no part.
    �
    Dear me. China has never had a political system because it's never had politics in the sense we think of them. China has had by far the best governance system on earth for 2,000 years: the same one they have today. But you knew that, too.
    https://i.imgur.com/EdH9tMs.png

    Replies: @That Would Be Telling, @Patrick Cleburne, @Pizzastand, @drmanchild

    Was this paper published anywhere before being posted on OpenPsych on July 17? If not, too soon for a considered response. Verbal abuse though is cheap
    .
    Cases of Chinese IP theft are legion: https://vdare.com/posts/red-chinese-spies-another-benefit-of-immigration

    “Nor has the PRC ever told a lie or broken a promise.” EVER? Is this a joke? What about the promise to the Peasants that they would get their own land after the war with the KMT in the late ’40s? Followed by exceptionally bloody collectivization.

    Your distinction between Governance and a Political system is interesting. But the central virtue of the systems in the West is having a way to transfer power without having a costly civil war. China has not been exempt from the problems this causes and may never be.

    Of course, it now seems 21C America may not be either.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Godfree Roberts
    @Patrick Cleburne


    Was this paper published anywhere before being posted on OpenPsych on July 17? If not, too soon for a considered response. Verbal abuse though is cheap
    �
    What paper and what verbal abuse are you referring to?
    .

    Cases of Chinese IP theft are legion: https://vdare.com/posts/red-chinese-spies-another-benefit-of-immigration
    �
    . Like 99% of such 'cases,' they are allegations only.

    “Nor has the PRC ever told a lie or broken a promise.†EVER? Is this a joke? What about the promise to the Peasants that they would get their own land after the war with the KMT in the late ’40s? Followed by exceptionally bloody collectivization.
    �
    Ever. It has never lied. The peasants got their land and still have it. Collectivization was not bloody partly because it was entirely voluntary. Even at its peak, only 40% of villages had fully collectivized, and some rejected the idea completely.

    Your distinction between Governance and a Political system is interesting. But the central virtue of the systems in the West is having a way to transfer power without having a costly civil war. China has not been exempt from the problems this causes and may never be.
    �
    The PRC has been transferring power peacefully since its founding and has not experienced the political violence – assassinations, etc. – we see in the USA.
    The US is a young country run by an anonymous oligarchy unresponsive to citizens' desires. [Gilens and Page, 'The central point of our research is that economic elites and organized business interests have substantial independent impacts on US government policy, while mass-based interest groups and average citizens have little or no independent influence'. https://tinyurl.com/yc3mvrxh].
    The oligarchy does not transfer power. It just changes frontmen every four years.
    The next elections will test our ability to transfer power peacefully.
  • @Realist

    There are a lot of pro-China propagandists¹ on Unz.com – can’t wait to see ’em butthurt!
    �
    Why the animosity against those that have some good opinions about China? A personal thing.

    Replies: @Vergissmeinnicht

    The Chinese Gov’t oppresses its people. The Chinese are smart enough to have Freedom and Democracy. (At least, in manners à la South Koreans and Japanese.)

    Look, I’m a Cultural Particularist: Dictators, Autocrats, Fascism etc. can work and maybe even are the best ways to govern some peoples – who are inbred, collectivistic and/or low-IQ…
    .
    .
    .

    Kinda unrelated ‘fun fact’: consumption of alcohol may increase CORRUPTION.

    Here’s: https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/475

    •ï¿½Replies: @Realist
    @Vergissmeinnicht


    The Chinese Gov’t oppresses its people.
    �
    So does the United States.

    Replies: @Vergissmeinnicht, @Vergissmeinnicht
  • In hindsight it’s obvious we should have allied with Japan and nuked China. They’d be pulling their glutes kowtowing to us for another 300 years.

  • @Kidist Paulos Asrat
    Adbel Abdellaoui is a strange ending for an article about Chinese IQ.

    But lets go there.

    Adbel Abdellaoui is presented as an Ethiopian, a nomeclature he uses with relish to show an identity of sorts.

    But, he would much prefer to be know as a Muslim. But then "A Muslim from where?" becomes his dilema

    The natural Ethiopian, the Amahra, is the founder, and natural heir of Ethiopia. Sure there are countelss lefty Amhara, but their allegiance to Ethiopia is natural, and historically correct. And yes, there is Ethiopian/Amhara scholarship.Adbel Abdellaoui is a strange ending for an article about Chinese IQ.

    But lets go there.

    Adbel Abdellaoui is presented as an Ethiopian, a nomeclature he uses with relish to show an identity of sorts.

    But, he would much prefer to be know as a Muslim. But then "A Muslim from where?" becomes his dilemma.

    The natural Ethiopian, the Amahra, is the founder, and natural heir of Ethiopia. Sure there are countelss lefty Amhara, but their allegiance to Ethiopia is natural, and historically correct. And yes, there is Ethiopian/Amhara scholarship.

    If articles bring up any kind of hyprid Ethiopia-grifter to the fore, then keep digging, and you will find plenty, which fall short. It would have been better to keep this Abdellaoui simply as a "Muslim 'scholar' at Amsterdam's University Medical Centers" or just kept him out of the article altogether, where he appears only as an "I told you so" appendage.

    KPA

    Replies: @Kidist Paulos Asrat

    Dilemma, of course.

  • Adbel Abdellaoui is a strange ending for an article about Chinese IQ.

    But lets go there.

    Adbel Abdellaoui is presented as an Ethiopian, a nomeclature he uses with relish to show an identity of sorts.

    But, he would much prefer to be know as a Muslim. But then “A Muslim from where?” becomes his dilema

    The natural Ethiopian, the Amahra, is the founder, and natural heir of Ethiopia. Sure there are countelss lefty Amhara, but their allegiance to Ethiopia is natural, and historically correct. And yes, there is Ethiopian/Amhara scholarship.Adbel Abdellaoui is a strange ending for an article about Chinese IQ.

    But lets go there.

    Adbel Abdellaoui is presented as an Ethiopian, a nomeclature he uses with relish to show an identity of sorts.

    But, he would much prefer to be know as a Muslim. But then “A Muslim from where?” becomes his dilemma.

    The natural Ethiopian, the Amahra, is the founder, and natural heir of Ethiopia. Sure there are countelss lefty Amhara, but their allegiance to Ethiopia is natural, and historically correct. And yes, there is Ethiopian/Amhara scholarship.

    If articles bring up any kind of hyprid Ethiopia-grifter to the fore, then keep digging, and you will find plenty, which fall short. It would have been better to keep this Abdellaoui simply as a “Muslim ‘scholar’ at Amsterdam’s University Medical Centers” or just kept him out of the article altogether, where he appears only as an “I told you so” appendage.

    KPA

    •ï¿½Replies: @Kidist Paulos Asrat
    @Kidist Paulos Asrat

    Dilemma, of course.
  • @Godfree Roberts

    Maybe, but this Chinese development is devastating. I cannot believe that Kirkegaard is serious about the effect of Communism. Several countries much higher up the list experienced Communist rule for as long or much longer. The Chinese are in fact behaving like a totally different species.
    �
    Where have you been since Kirkegaard's culturally tone-deaf, -dumb and -blind paper was published? It was much derided by Chinese, who explained what they would do in such cases–and none would 'hand it in' to anyone but the local beat cop.
    In any case, China is a high-trust society and also highly trustworthy. Though it dominates world science, only one of the top 20 science fraudsters is Chinese, and he was from Taiwan. Nor has there ever been a case in any court against China for stealing significant IP. Nor has the PRC ever told a lie or broken a promise.. But you know all that.
    https://i.imgur.com/PCJiYmV.png

    China evolved in almost total isolation from the West for thousands of years, never producing a political system more sophisticated than a despotism. It did however produce a culture of amoral familism in which honest dealings with outsiders had no part.
    �
    Dear me. China has never had a political system because it's never had politics in the sense we think of them. China has had by far the best governance system on earth for 2,000 years: the same one they have today. But you knew that, too.
    https://i.imgur.com/EdH9tMs.png

    Replies: @That Would Be Telling, @Patrick Cleburne, @Pizzastand, @drmanchild

    Nope, the PRC is infamous for bogus scientific papers, so much so there are entire fields like protein crystallography where the serious scientists in the field completely ignore their output. We also see how such claimed scientific prowess does not, in fact, translate into things like military jet engines competitive with Russian ones, let alone those further West.

    Now, the papers issue is not one we can judge the authors on too harshly, indeed because Communism. The CCP doesn’t understand science and has set up a regime of paper quotas for scientists, publish or perish is almost literally true.

    If you want to do good social science on all this, you need to use Taiwan as a control which was not done here. Which of course says nothing about foreign policy et. al., but the idea you can “do business” with unrepentant Communists is utterly fatuous, especially after our century of experience in trying to do this (depending in part on the current leadership, but also across multiple Communist regimes).

    Let me mention all the suspicions we have about the current “Biden” “engagement” with Xi/the CCP, for example “Why America’s Elites are Dedicated to Engagement with Communist China” while noting at minimum the US Deep State has factions, some of which are going after the PRC with a rusty knife. In particular crushing their aspirations to make anywhere near modern chips, especially economically.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Godfree Roberts
    @That Would Be Telling

    the PRC is infamous for bogus scientific papers??

    The PRC is infamous for everything, if we are to believe Western media.

    As I said, it leads the world in research quality, quantity and scope, and has never stolen IP.
  • Richard B says:
    July 27, 2023 at 2:04 pm GMT •ï¿½400 Words

    By the 18th century, independent scholars did the most important research and science…the “uncredentialed†independent scientist is rising again.

    Of course! This is something I’ve commented on for years, including more recent comments here at TUR.

    European culture was created by people who today would be classed as amateurs.
    Kant, for example, was the first professional philosopher, and there were hardly any professional scientists until late in the 19th century. From an historical perspective professionalism as we think of it today is something fairly recent, and has been anything but a mixed blessing.

    But the amateurs did not think of themselves as “scholars”, and the average professional scholar was an object of mockery for Nietzsche, and not just Nietzsche. With rare exception they’re still objects of mockery (exactly because genuine scholarship is exceptional, ie; rare).

    The amatuteur of the past had a good deal of the even older tradition of the virtuoso, the man who collected and studied in any area that moved him. These were the men responsible for the assembly of important materials for scholarship and science (the real kind of both that used to be practiced).

    Darwin himself was, by today’s standards, an amateur naturalist of a very traditional English sort.

    In fact, not only was the amateur-virtuosos tradition so vital in the life of Goethe, but he used that as the model for his Faust. And, it’s highly relevent today, and so worth pointing out, that Goethe was inspired in part to write that masterpiece in response to his ultimate rejection of the Illuminati (to which he belonged to for a time), the secret organization started by Weishaupt that would eventually become Supremacy Inc.

    One could argue that the amateur-virtuoso tradition is to Eurpean culture what fake scholarship is to Supremacy Inc. Meaning, the amateur-virtuoso tradition, a bequeath of European culture at its best, is the answer to the fake scholarship used by the hostile elite in its attempt to destroy the West and replace it with barbarism. Far from being something to sneer at, amateurization is something for the public to respect and for the elite to fear.

    •ï¿½Agree: Eric135
    •ï¿½Thanks: Prince Saradine
    •ï¿½Replies: @baythoven
    @Richard B

    Richard B -- I thought your #5. comment brilliant, then I read this one which I appreciate even more. Off-the-charts interesting! Thank you.
  • I actually have a returned wallet story in China to tell. American businessman living in China. One morning somewhere in the Shanghai Pudong Airport I dropped my wallet which contained my ID, an array of credit cards including my ATM card and several hundred dollars cash in local currency. I’m guessing it was near checkin because I did not make the shocking discovery of my lost wallet until I arrived at my destination in Harbin which is in the far northeast of China. I had no money for a taxi to take me to the hotel which I had booked. However, a local whom I was visiting arrived and helped with transport and then assisted me with check in into the hotel downtown until I could develop a recovery strategy.

    Mentally tracing my steps I decided to call the Pudong Airport and report my missing wallet. The airport officials took my information and told me that they would have a look around and come back to me later via phone call. Later in the day a phone call came. My wallet had been found. They notified me that it would be flown up to Harbin on an evening flight and they provided the details. That evening I went to airport and identified myself to the airline. They produced a large sealed envelope with my wallet. I was shocked to find all of the cash, credit cards, and ID untouched and in place. Nothing had been taken. This event occurred in 2009. I wrote a letter of thanks to the airline and all of those involved.

    I’ve been living in Asia for 32 years and I have similar stories from my 6 years in Japan, a country overflowing with stories of honesty. However, I also have more stories of honesty from China that rank on par with what one might find in Japan. By the way your country honesty graph appears to be missing Japan which would probably rank ahead of Switzerland.

    •ï¿½Agree: Godfree Roberts
  • Maybe, but this Chinese development is devastating. I cannot believe that Kirkegaard is serious about the effect of Communism. Several countries much higher up the list experienced Communist rule for as long or much longer.

    Russia has a much better honesty rating than Canada, the US and UK, and their are other examples, too. So your assertion is certainly plausible. But France’s rating is suspiciously high. Did any of these tests take place in the banlieues. I doubt it.

    This suggests there are problems with the methodology of these tests. You would need to ensure representative samples of the general population, as well as replicability. So further work needs to be done. Having said that, China’s very poor rating can’t be easily airbrushed away.

  • xyzxy says:
    July 27, 2023 at 1:09 pm GMT •ï¿½300 Words

    The Chinese are in fact behaving like a totally different species.

    “Hundreds†Of U.S. Politicians Purchased. How Can Mitch McConnell NOT Be One?

    Has Patrick confused China with Jews and Israel? We know how honest, upright, transparent, moral, and Hu-White Jews have been, throughout their history.

    Lately, Vdare has been on an anti-China kick. How America’s problems are greatly exacerbated, if not created, by China and Chinese.

    Not sure where they are coming from, or their goal in it all. It curiously approaches Jewish neocon inspired Sean Hannity level thinking. Possibly getting folks ready for war with China?

    The first thing you want to do to your enemy is demonize them. Call them immoral, inhuman, a different species, liars and cheaters, the ‘next Hitler’ and so forth. You saw that in a lot of anti-German propaganda during the last great war, with the first Hitler. And every war since.

    If it’s true, it’s true. But to find out the possible source of America’s problems, here’s a little John Lennon Imagine Mind Game I’ve mentioned previously: Imagine that all Chinese on the planet suddenly disappeared overnight. Then think of America’s most pressing problems. Would these problems suddenly go away?

    Would the Great Replacement, endless wars for Israel, debasement of the dollar via the Fed, corrupt Israel First politicians, inner-city crime, BLM riots, Antifa, LGTB+ indoctrination, trannyfication and mutilation of children, proxy war against Russia–well, you can make up your own list… would all those problems be gone, or even reduced, if China disappeared?

    Now, try that mental exercise using other groups, Jews, blacks, etc. Compare results. Once you do that, you can start to get a grip on from who and where our problems derive.

  • Great article! Thanks!

    If Kirkegaard has really uncovered such a massive systemic taint in the Chinese, then the whole U.S. relationship with China needs to be carefully reconsidered.

    There are only two super powers in the world today, and neither are Western.
    Those two are Supremacy Inc. and The CCP. They’re both busy dividing up the spoils.
    Put bluntly, Western Civilization is being replaced by Asiatic Barbarism.

    In any event, the correlation between low intelligence and criminality is reliable as far as it goes. But it doesn’t go far enough. Because intelligence and criminality also go together. Knowing this in their bones is why Supremacy Inc. is so touchy on the matter. They’re afraid researchers will find the criminal gene – in them – and that genes long-term impact on human adaptability.

    For a better idea of exactly what is meant by Supremacy Inc. check out the first three paragraphs from Chapter 22 of Douglas Reed’s The Controversy of Zion. https://www.unz.com/book/douglas_reed__the-controversy-of-zion/

  • Godfree Roberts says: •ï¿½Website

    Maybe, but this Chinese development is devastating. I cannot believe that Kirkegaard is serious about the effect of Communism. Several countries much higher up the list experienced Communist rule for as long or much longer. The Chinese are in fact behaving like a totally different species.

    Where have you been since Kirkegaard’s culturally tone-deaf, -dumb and -blind paper was published? It was much derided by Chinese, who explained what they would do in such cases–and none would ‘hand it in’ to anyone but the local beat cop.
    In any case, China is a high-trust society and also highly trustworthy. Though it dominates world science, only one of the top 20 science fraudsters is Chinese, and he was from Taiwan. Nor has there ever been a case in any court against China for stealing significant IP. Nor has the PRC ever told a lie or broken a promise.. But you know all that.

    China evolved in almost total isolation from the West for thousands of years, never producing a political system more sophisticated than a despotism. It did however produce a culture of amoral familism in which honest dealings with outsiders had no part.

    Dear me. China has never had a political system because it’s never had politics in the sense we think of them. China has had by far the best governance system on earth for 2,000 years: the same one they have today. But you knew that, too.

    •ï¿½Troll: Pop Warner
    •ï¿½Replies: @That Would Be Telling
    @Godfree Roberts

    Nope, the PRC is infamous for bogus scientific papers, so much so there are entire fields like protein crystallography where the serious scientists in the field completely ignore their output. We also see how such claimed scientific prowess does not, in fact, translate into things like military jet engines competitive with Russian ones, let alone those further West.

    Now, the papers issue is not one we can judge the authors on too harshly, indeed because Communism. The CCP doesn't understand science and has set up a regime of paper quotas for scientists, publish or perish is almost literally true.

    If you want to do good social science on all this, you need to use Taiwan as a control which was not done here. Which of course says nothing about foreign policy et. al., but the idea you can "do business" with unrepentant Communists is utterly fatuous, especially after our century of experience in trying to do this (depending in part on the current leadership, but also across multiple Communist regimes).

    Let me mention all the suspicions we have about the current "Biden" "engagement" with Xi/the CCP, for example "Why America’s Elites are Dedicated to Engagement with Communist China" while noting at minimum the US Deep State has factions, some of which are going after the PRC with a rusty knife. In particular crushing their aspirations to make anywhere near modern chips, especially economically.

    Replies: @Godfree Roberts
    , @Patrick Cleburne
    @Godfree Roberts

    Was this paper published anywhere before being posted on OpenPsych on July 17? If not, too soon for a considered response. Verbal abuse though is cheap
    .
    Cases of Chinese IP theft are legion: https://vdare.com/posts/red-chinese-spies-another-benefit-of-immigration

    "Nor has the PRC ever told a lie or broken a promise." EVER? Is this a joke? What about the promise to the Peasants that they would get their own land after the war with the KMT in the late '40s? Followed by exceptionally bloody collectivization.

    Your distinction between Governance and a Political system is interesting. But the central virtue of the systems in the West is having a way to transfer power without having a costly civil war. China has not been exempt from the problems this causes and may never be.

    Of course, it now seems 21C America may not be either.

    Replies: @Godfree Roberts
    , @Pizzastand
    @Godfree Roberts

    Actually, Dr. Roberts, China did develop a political system beyond mere governance; politics and political systems being defined by the use and distribution of power. And in this sense, China's system cannot be accurately defined as despotic, at least in the strict use of the term; nor was it unsophisticated, as is implied by the OP. Quite the opposite. Indeed, one of its underlying philosophies, Mohist consequentialism, is described by the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy as "the world’s earliest form of consequentialism, a remarkably sophisticated version based on a plurality of intrinsic goods taken as constitutive of collective human welfare." Basically the state defined progress in terms of the collective, which perhaps forms a link to its modern communist outlook.

    Two aspects of China's well-developed political system are relevant here: First, the Mandate of Heaven assigns the task of governance to the one who will serve the people. Mencius, perhaps the greatest Confucian (after Confucius himself), famously said, "Heaven does not create the people for the sake of the Sovereign; Heaven creates the Sovereign for the sake of the people." Confucian and even Legalist scholars since those times (few centuries BC) stated repeatedly that the purpose and focus of the ruler and officials was to determine the interests of the people so that the state could fulfill them. For Confucians, this was to be achieved through ren, which can variously be defined as benevolence, magnanimity, kindess; for Legalists, this was to be attained through strict rules and codes. Whatever the means, the aim was to serve and care for the people to produce harmony in the State. This places serious constraints on the use and formulation of power: the ruler cannot simply do as he pleases and impose his will on the people. Contrast this with the Divine Right of Kings that defined political systems and power in much of Europe until the modern era. Indeed, it was relatively common for Chinese emperors to issue written apologies to the people, read by criers, while in Europe, in the rare instance that kings apologized, they only ever did so to the Pope. Apologizing to the people was simply beneath the aristocracy.

    But in China, the legitimacy of rule rested squarely on the king or emperor's ability to serve the common people. Conversely, he is not a legitimate ruler--and loses his Mandate--if the people's welfare suffers and especially if they are abused or mistreated. The Heavens would reveal the loss of Mandate through natural disasters or, more commonly, popular rebellions which would lead to the transfer of power, i.e., the change of Mandate. Practically speaking, this is an early form of consent of governed. While, yes, the rationale is rooted in ancient Chinese cosmology, in practice it takes human action--popular uprisings and rebellion--to replace a ruler. Importantly, the cosmology attaches meaning to rebellion: it is key to the change of power that leads to the restoration of the State.

    The second piece is China's longstanding meritocracy, institutionalized in a battery of written exams that have been administered regularly for some 1,400 years. In theory, any male could sit for the exams and, provided he passed, was then eligible for any number of political appointments that could lead to more powerful and lucrative positions. In practice, then as now, wealthier families had an edge because they could pay tutors to instruct their sons. But the fact remained that there was a well-defined means by which those without wealth or connections could attain those things and rise up in society. So, those with modest means could save some money, splurge on tutoring for their more promising sons, and hope for the best. Now, contrast this with most other places in the world (including Europe) which were run by aristocracies up until early in the last century. The idea that a serf or pauper could become a high official was laughable. Yet Europeans warmed to the idea of a meritocracy, beginning with Britain in the 1850s when colonial officials proposed an exam-based system modeled on China's to select officials to run the Empire.

    The key is that China's system produced a huge, entrenched political class that directly controlled everyday affairs and policy. True, it was filled with many self-interested bureaucrats and often inefficient, but this provided a powerful counterbalance to central authority, namely the emperor and his court: A would-be autocrat was essentially stymied by red tape. And, of course, by the ever-present fear of uprisings that might signal the loss of his Mandate.

    One more thing: As mentioned above, China's system has a longstanding focus on collective welfare, which may link it to the communism of today. Perhaps when Kierkegaard refers to communism to explain the behavior of Chinese workers in his study, he is also referring to this strong sense of the collective, with a concomitantly weak sense of the individual--and individual property. Thus, while I am not entirely convinced with his explanation, I think it is plausible. Someone raised in a staunch collectivist or communist setting, when presented with a small sum, might be more likely than an American or Mexican to feel like they have just as much a right to it as anyone else--including the owner. Given the basement level wages in China, it might be even more tempting to make this rationalization. Any remaining qualms might be settled by noting that the wallet's owner likely won't be hurt much by this loss: the government, being communist, heavily subsidizes all expenses and essentially puts a roof over everyone's head no matter their station. Again, this does not justify what amounts to theft, but helps explain why such a pattern might be more likely in communist societies.

    [Dr. Roberts, I know none of this is news to you, and I'm not saying that for effect. I've written this to help inform the rest, who generally know little about your field of expertise, China.]
    , @drmanchild
    @Godfree Roberts

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AynNsPs9i80 This guy opened my eyes a bit. I've never been to China but have known a broad sample of native Chinese in college, business and personally and have found they are more prone to cheating and short-cuts than whites. As a poster said above, many of us who root for China only do so because, as much as we don't know about China, we do know the truth about the USA.

    Replies: @Godfree Roberts
  • There are a lot of pro-China propagandists¹ on Unz.com – can’t wait to see ’em butthurt!

    Why the animosity against those that have some good opinions about China? A personal thing.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Vergissmeinnicht
    @Realist

    The Chinese Gov't oppresses its people. The Chinese are smart enough to have Freedom and Democracy. (At least, in manners à la South Koreans and Japanese.)

    Look, I'm a Cultural Particularist: Dictators, Autocrats, Fascism etc. can work and maybe even are the best ways to govern some peoples – who are inbred, collectivistic and/or low-IQ…
    .
    .
    .

    Kinda unrelated 'fun fact': consumption of alcohol may increase CORRUPTION.

    Here's: https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/475

    Replies: @Realist
  • Most people of all races are pretty honest, but there is a far left tail of very dishonest people, and this tail is a lot larger for Blacks than for Whites and Hispanics. This is where we expect to find most of the career criminals, serial welfare fraudsters etc.

    This tail is also where we get our legislators, the street cops and the amoral killers in the US military. It represents the dregs of the society at the top and bottom.

    Ninety eight percent of the adults in this country are decent, hardworking, honest Americans. It’s the other lousy two percent that get all the publicity. But then, we elected them.
    Lily Tomlin

  • The Chinese being more dishonest than Whites doesn’t surprise me at all – given 2 factors: the well-established country differences in corruption; plus, Asiatic peoples being collectivistic.

    But the Chinese being that more dishonest than Whites does surprise me! Holy moley!
    (I’m implying the paper’s findings are accurate, of course.)
    .
    .
    .

    There are a lot of pro-China propagandists¹ on Unz.com – can’t wait to see ’em butthurt!

    1. I’ve thought about why they like China – pondered complex and multifaceted reasons for it, but I’m leaning towards this: “America is bad. China opposes America. Therefore, China is good.”

    •ï¿½Agree: Pop Warner
  • In the good ole USA, many are brain-dead and believe whatever pushed by Jewish-run media. Others are cowardly, and hating on China happens to be safer than naming the real power causing the biggest problems: Jews, with help of black thugs and homo degenerates. It's like honest people will blame Jewish Power on whatever's wrong...
  • Chris Moore says: •ï¿½Website
    @eudion2
    @Chris Moore


    “Jews†are Christâ€killers who have attempted to replace Jesus with the “Holocaust†(kill him twice). These ((jews)) are parasites on both Christendom AND Moses, who founded Judaism by whacking (Hebrew?) parasites, which the Satanists claim was the original holocaust.
    �
    You're another Andrew-Anglin "Christian" who needs to read the Bible someday. You'll find out that the Old Testament Jews were into genocide and screwing up other nations with the full blessing of "God." Of course it's all fiction -- but that's the point. It's been fiction all along.

    The 'Hebrew Parasites' that Moses 'whacked' were mainly those who wanted democracy or shied away from total mass-murder of the peoples of the land they were invading. The 'Good Book' is not really good at all.

    Jesus didn't deny this heritage, he announced that he had come to fulfill it. He didn't repudiate the Jews and in fact said, "Salvation comes from the Jews." Of course, Jesus never existed and some Jewish writer seeking to fleece the goyim put those words in Jesus's mouth. It worked, and so the Roman Empire fell, and so now all of Western Civilization is falling. And by embracing the Jesus Myth, you're helping the Jews pull it down.

    I wonder who will have them once the Christians are gone.

    Replies: @Chris Moore

    The ‘Hebrew Parasites’ that Moses ‘whacked’ were mainly those who wanted democracy or shied away from total mass-murder of the peoples of the land they were invading.

    They were multicult, polygot degenerates, parasites and grifters who previously betrayed the Hebrews by selling them into slavery. They were angling for the Golden Calf — the precursor to the “magical” Fed printing press of today, whose “good credit” is now built on ((jew)) Ponzis, ((jew)) wars, and ((jew)) Globalist slavery.

    You’re obviously a Satanist shilling for your demon masters.

  • @Chris Moore
    @Franz


    Jews will disappear after Christianity, because without Christians Jews make no sense. The rule only by being closer to the “God†Europeans think is theirs, and when enough Christians jump ship, it’s gone
    �
    "Jews" are Christâ€killers who have attempted to replace Jesus with the "Holocaust" (kill him twice). These ((jews)) are parasites on both Christendom AND Moses, who founded Judaism by whacking (Hebrew?) parasites, which the Satanists claim was the original holocaust.

    So these ((jews)) and Talmudists have formulated an insidious, anti-religion (Satanism) which celebrates all of the values that Moses-Christianity abhors. The "Holocaust" is this Satanic ((jewish)) icon. And of course, the Federal Reserve funny money and ((jewish)) bankers and the Commie State that are behind it all.

    Nice try though, Franz. Keep working on that Commie/Mammon agenda. You might be able to milk it for a couple more years before the bottom falls out and you are all finally brought to justice.

    Replies: @eudion2

    “Jews†are Christâ€killers who have attempted to replace Jesus with the “Holocaust†(kill him twice). These ((jews)) are parasites on both Christendom AND Moses, who founded Judaism by whacking (Hebrew?) parasites, which the Satanists claim was the original holocaust.

    You’re another Andrew-Anglin “Christian” who needs to read the Bible someday. You’ll find out that the Old Testament Jews were into genocide and screwing up other nations with the full blessing of “God.” Of course it’s all fiction — but that’s the point. It’s been fiction all along.

    The ‘Hebrew Parasites’ that Moses ‘whacked’ were mainly those who wanted democracy or shied away from total mass-murder of the peoples of the land they were invading. The ‘Good Book’ is not really good at all.

    Jesus didn’t deny this heritage, he announced that he had come to fulfill it. He didn’t repudiate the Jews and in fact said, “Salvation comes from the Jews.” Of course, Jesus never existed and some Jewish writer seeking to fleece the goyim put those words in Jesus’s mouth. It worked, and so the Roman Empire fell, and so now all of Western Civilization is falling. And by embracing the Jesus Myth, you’re helping the Jews pull it down.

    I wonder who will have them once the Christians are gone.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Chris Moore
    @eudion2


    The ‘Hebrew Parasites’ that Moses ‘whacked’ were mainly those who wanted democracy or shied away from total mass-murder of the peoples of the land they were invading.
    �
    They were multicult, polygot degenerates, parasites and grifters who previously betrayed the Hebrews by selling them into slavery. They were angling for the Golden Calf -- the precursor to the "magical" Fed printing press of today, whose "good credit" is now built on ((jew)) Ponzis, ((jew)) wars, and ((jew)) Globalist slavery.

    You're obviously a Satanist shilling for your demon masters.
  • If ever there were a perfect example of RICO Act violations on a global scale, Global Jew Incorporated would be the standard by which Organized Crime Syndicates are held to account for their criminal activities.
    Since the DOJ, DHS, Treasury and State Department are under Zionist control, the US flag now represents Rainbow Pride, Synagogue of Satan, and Black Lawless thugs, while justice is for the lawless criminals destroying society as we once knew it.

    Welcome to America’s New World Order Reset.

    The RICO Act: ((( Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act,†is a law that allows authorities to punish offenders engaging in criminal activities, particularly racketeering. RICO law punishes crime bosses who order their subordinates to carry out criminal activities for them. Else, these bosses could claim innocence because they technically were not the ones to carry out the crimes.
    (((See Hollywood, Wall Street, Big Tech, Big Pharma, Big Biz, MIC ad infinitum))).

    •ï¿½Agree: A. Clifton
  • It’s like Donald Trump, after getting rammed in the ass by Jewish Power, does little but shill for Israel.

    When did you notice? Was it before or after his ENTIRE LIFE being controlled and manipulated by jews or just recently? So, no, its not “like Trump”. Trump was/is/will always be a shill for jews. Stop the idiotic Trump admiration.



    Video Link

  • Chris Moore says: •ï¿½Website
    @Franz
    @bruce see


    But if the Jews kill Christianity, how long will that last?
    �
    Israel Shamir wrote a great piece about this years ago. and I curse the fact I lost it.

    Anyway, Shamir said nope. Jews will disappear after Christianity, because without Christians Jews make no sense. The rule only by being closer to the "God" Europeans think is theirs, and when enough Christians jump ship, it's gone.

    Replies: @Chris Moore

    Jews will disappear after Christianity, because without Christians Jews make no sense. The rule only by being closer to the “God†Europeans think is theirs, and when enough Christians jump ship, it’s gone

    “Jews” are Christâ€killers who have attempted to replace Jesus with the “Holocaust” (kill him twice). These ((jews)) are parasites on both Christendom AND Moses, who founded Judaism by whacking (Hebrew?) parasites, which the Satanists claim was the original holocaust.

    So these ((jews)) and Talmudists have formulated an insidious, anti-religion (Satanism) which celebrates all of the values that Moses-Christianity abhors. The “Holocaust” is this Satanic ((jewish)) icon. And of course, the Federal Reserve funny money and ((jewish)) bankers and the Commie State that are behind it all.

    Nice try though, Franz. Keep working on that Commie/Mammon agenda. You might be able to milk it for a couple more years before the bottom falls out and you are all finally brought to justice.

    •ï¿½Replies: @eudion2
    @Chris Moore


    “Jews†are Christâ€killers who have attempted to replace Jesus with the “Holocaust†(kill him twice). These ((jews)) are parasites on both Christendom AND Moses, who founded Judaism by whacking (Hebrew?) parasites, which the Satanists claim was the original holocaust.
    �
    You're another Andrew-Anglin "Christian" who needs to read the Bible someday. You'll find out that the Old Testament Jews were into genocide and screwing up other nations with the full blessing of "God." Of course it's all fiction -- but that's the point. It's been fiction all along.

    The 'Hebrew Parasites' that Moses 'whacked' were mainly those who wanted democracy or shied away from total mass-murder of the peoples of the land they were invading. The 'Good Book' is not really good at all.

    Jesus didn't deny this heritage, he announced that he had come to fulfill it. He didn't repudiate the Jews and in fact said, "Salvation comes from the Jews." Of course, Jesus never existed and some Jewish writer seeking to fleece the goyim put those words in Jesus's mouth. It worked, and so the Roman Empire fell, and so now all of Western Civilization is falling. And by embracing the Jesus Myth, you're helping the Jews pull it down.

    I wonder who will have them once the Christians are gone.

    Replies: @Chris Moore
  • Franz says:
    @bruce see
    China is a problem because everything is made in China, but that's not China's fault: that's the fault of the Yahwists. Blaming China for wanting to make money rather than blaming Yahwists for supporting exporting businesses to China is retarded.

    My question is how long after the Jews destroy Christianity will it take for atheists and non-christians to stop viewing anything negative to the Jews as sin? You know that is left-over Christianity from the Christian delusion that the Jews were (or still are to the conpletely retarded ones) "the Chosen People of God." Atheists who believe in no God are still viewing the Jews as such due to running on "the fumes of Christianity." But if the Jews kill Christianity, how long will that last? If neo-paganize takes root, how long before the Jews are viewed as the chosen of Loki or the Frost Giants rather than of Odin?

    Replies: @mijj, @Franz

    But if the Jews kill Christianity, how long will that last?

    Israel Shamir wrote a great piece about this years ago. and I curse the fact I lost it.

    Anyway, Shamir said nope. Jews will disappear after Christianity, because without Christians Jews make no sense. The rule only by being closer to the “God” Europeans think is theirs, and when enough Christians jump ship, it’s gone.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Chris Moore
    @Franz


    Jews will disappear after Christianity, because without Christians Jews make no sense. The rule only by being closer to the “God†Europeans think is theirs, and when enough Christians jump ship, it’s gone
    �
    "Jews" are Christâ€killers who have attempted to replace Jesus with the "Holocaust" (kill him twice). These ((jews)) are parasites on both Christendom AND Moses, who founded Judaism by whacking (Hebrew?) parasites, which the Satanists claim was the original holocaust.

    So these ((jews)) and Talmudists have formulated an insidious, anti-religion (Satanism) which celebrates all of the values that Moses-Christianity abhors. The "Holocaust" is this Satanic ((jewish)) icon. And of course, the Federal Reserve funny money and ((jewish)) bankers and the Commie State that are behind it all.

    Nice try though, Franz. Keep working on that Commie/Mammon agenda. You might be able to milk it for a couple more years before the bottom falls out and you are all finally brought to justice.

    Replies: @eudion2
  • mijj says:
    @bruce see
    China is a problem because everything is made in China, but that's not China's fault: that's the fault of the Yahwists. Blaming China for wanting to make money rather than blaming Yahwists for supporting exporting businesses to China is retarded.

    My question is how long after the Jews destroy Christianity will it take for atheists and non-christians to stop viewing anything negative to the Jews as sin? You know that is left-over Christianity from the Christian delusion that the Jews were (or still are to the conpletely retarded ones) "the Chosen People of God." Atheists who believe in no God are still viewing the Jews as such due to running on "the fumes of Christianity." But if the Jews kill Christianity, how long will that last? If neo-paganize takes root, how long before the Jews are viewed as the chosen of Loki or the Frost Giants rather than of Odin?

    Replies: @mijj, @Franz

    > “China is a problem because everything is made in China”

    nope .. if China was a grovelling slave, then China doing all the labour would not be a problem at all. It would serve the function of being a slave state that allows the disempowering of the lower strata of the US.

    The problem is US Empire has found it lacks a choke chain round China’s neck.

    •ï¿½Agree: Mary Marianne
  • The “conservatives” need a group to hate, possible choices:

    1. Large and in charge women.

    2. Women who wear dangly earrings.

    3. Old women at Hobby Lobby.

    4. Disabled people.

    5. People who take up two seats on the bus.

    6. Ethnic guys who wear gold chains.

    7. Tattooed people.

    8. Motorcyclists.

    9. People with mirrored sunglasses.

    10. Buddhist monks in orange gowns.

    I hate all of these groups. It fills me with joy to hate all of these groups. It would be a lot cheaper to hate on these available groups rather than pick fights in Central Asia. BTW, hippies love you.

  • many are brain-dead and believe whatever pushed by Jewish-run media

    Um, your silly essays are pushed by Jewish run media. I usually just stick to laughing at the titles.

    Question for Ron: aren’t Jung Fraud and Priss Factor and Trinity all the same person?

  • Chris Moore says: •ï¿½Website

    Of course, it’s been made all the worse by the fact that Jewish Power has taken complete control of Conzo Leadership via bribery, blackmail, threats, and use of media to turn conzo youths into idiots who worship the same gods that the libshitz do. Just like sheep are directionless without the shepherd, it doesn’t matter what the people feel, think, or want if there aren’t leaders to embrace those views and lead the masses along shared principles and prejudices. With Jewish control of conzo leadership, the conzo masses are (mis)led by cuckservative whores of Zion who (1) never name the Jewish Power (2) never denounce homo influence and (3) dare not mention the blackness of American criminality and violence. (Rand Paul and his ilk will blame ‘socialism’ for Detroit’s woes, LOL. And name one white conzo politician who has denounced black attacks on innocent whites and non-blacks. The sheer lack of inspired race-ist leadership in American Conservatism has been fatal for the white race.)

    Every national politician is a Machievellian snake. It’s really the nature of the Multi-Cult, ZOG-occupied politico, who will be railroaded by ((jews)) if a steps one foot off of the ideological ZOG reservation. ((jews)) — the most smug, imperious, self-absorbed jackasses on the planet (they have been all the way back to Moses, when he was forced to cut their stiff-necks with his blade to even begin to civilize them) have made sure their sick, warped gang is in the cat-bird seat, and never intend to give it up. They’re like the worst, bad seed, spoiled brat prick grown up just enough to preserve the veneer of “authority” and “civilization” while “getting back” at their hardass father by destroying civilization-â€classic infantile narcissists.

    If and when a new Moses comes back to finish the job he started, this time he should take it to completion. Jesus Christ worked out as his heir for a couple thousand years, but the ((jews)) and their stooges wormed their way back into power, (re) assassinated him, and stole his authority. And the Commie and Anglo rat cucks helped them do it.

    •ï¿½Disagree: A. Clifton
  • China is a problem because everything is made in China

    That no problem. Every order come from Zion, but Zion not problem. Instead, it boss.
    If China make everything and also control all media and academia, people no put down China.

  • China is a problem because everything is made in China, but that’s not China’s fault: that’s the fault of the Yahwists. Blaming China for wanting to make money rather than blaming Yahwists for supporting exporting businesses to China is retarded.

    My question is how long after the Jews destroy Christianity will it take for atheists and non-christians to stop viewing anything negative to the Jews as sin? You know that is left-over Christianity from the Christian delusion that the Jews were (or still are to the conpletely retarded ones) “the Chosen People of God.” Atheists who believe in no God are still viewing the Jews as such due to running on “the fumes of Christianity.” But if the Jews kill Christianity, how long will that last? If neo-paganize takes root, how long before the Jews are viewed as the chosen of Loki or the Frost Giants rather than of Odin?

    •ï¿½Replies: @mijj
    @bruce see

    > "China is a problem because everything is made in China"

    nope .. if China was a grovelling slave, then China doing all the labour would not be a problem at all. It would serve the function of being a slave state that allows the disempowering of the lower strata of the US.

    The problem is US Empire has found it lacks a choke chain round China's neck.
    , @Franz
    @bruce see


    But if the Jews kill Christianity, how long will that last?
    �
    Israel Shamir wrote a great piece about this years ago. and I curse the fact I lost it.

    Anyway, Shamir said nope. Jews will disappear after Christianity, because without Christians Jews make no sense. The rule only by being closer to the "God" Europeans think is theirs, and when enough Christians jump ship, it's gone.

    Replies: @Chris Moore
  • Lee Kuan Yew, Singapore’s founding father and long-time prime minister (1959–1990), should be a role model for nationalists across the West. Lee was not a philosopher but a practical politician, so his insights are not theoretical but the product of three decades of leadership. Lee was able to adapt to changing circumstances, eliminate Communist threats,...
  • Alrenous says: •ï¿½Website
    April 3, 2022 at 8:17 pm GMT •ï¿½100 Words
    @littlereddot
    @Bill Jones


    Good piece but the “Low cost of living in Singapore†surprised me.
    �
    The interesting thing about Singapore, is that you can have either extreme. That chart is applicable if you live like an average Singaporean without fancy tastes.

    If you don't mind slumming it, you can get by with very little. If however you have a taste for the fancy stuff, then Singapore can be as expensive as anywhere else. This is something that I found differs greatly from the USA, where the differential between the low and high end markets are not so stark.

    For example in Sg, you can go eat a simple noodle dish at a no frills street food kind of place for $3, or you can cross the street to the mall and have exactly the same thing in air-conditioned food court for $6, or you could walk down the mall to mid range restaurant and have that same thing for $15. Then if you go two floors up in the same mall to a more upmarket place, they prices increase in the same orders of magnitude.

    You can ride the subway for $1 or you can buy a 1.5 litre Honda Accord for $120,000. A 2 litre Mercedes E class would start from $200, 000 (and that is with a license to own the for 10 years, and petrol prices are $8 a gallon, and I am not even adding other incidentals like road taxes, inspection fees, mandatory insurances etc)

    Certain things in Singapore are inescapably high. Cars as mentioned are one, they are on average 4 to 5 X what they cost in the US to buy, and much higher to run.

    Housing prices also high. A pre-owned no frills public housing apartment of 2 bedrooms and 780 square feet in size will sell for upwards of $260, 000. This is about the lowest priced property one can buy. If one has fancier tastes, then consider paying prices on par with downtown SF or NYC.

    If one is so inclined, he can manage to live in Singapore quite inexpensively if he avoids the outrageously priced big ticket items. Otherwise, it is really the Crazy Rich Asians.

    Replies: @Alrenous

    How’s the crime, though?

    You can get some very satisfyingly cheap places in Americoid cities. Excellent value for money – except you’re living around inconsiderate assholes and outright criminals. The architecture and infrastructure are more than enough, and the people would benefit from a dose of guillotine. Hope you have a plan for bed bugs – no, that’s not an exaggeration.

    Are low-end Singaporean neighbours loud and obnoxious? Will you get your bike stolen? Are the landlords impossible to deal with?

    P.S. Fun fact: you have a near-genetic memory of how bed bugs smell. You don’t need to learn. If it smells like bugs, it’s because you have bugs.

  • See, earlier, by Linda Thom: Unrest In Urumqi—A Californian Draws A Dark Lesson For Her Own State There’s an old stereotype that “all Chinese people look the same.†However, what people really mean is that Han Chinese people, who make up 91% of the population of the People’s Republic of China, look the same. There...
  • @Showmethereal
    This is pretty poor scholarship. First thing is the Uighurs are most definitely on the 56 recognized ethnic groups in China. Outside of the insurgent areas of Xinjiang they receive preferential policies like all other minorities in China. Some of them have "made it big" in eastern cities. For you to miss than is pretty bad..
    But talking about homeland is also completely false. They migrated to that region just like the Han did. When the Han people first took control of that region 2100 years ago there were no Uighurs. The people who were there were more related to the Mongols than Turks. The people who now are closest to those original people are the Kazhaks.
    The Tajiks to the south are well respected in their area. Why? They fought on the Chinese side against the Soviets while many Uighurs sided witht the Soviets who promised them their own "stan". The Nationalist KMT was too weak to subdue them but when the Communists took over they were able. Some Uighurs were patriotic toward China and helped subdue the region against the Soviet backed brothers. That is it got to where it is. Some Uighurs want independence still while others are fine being Chinese. But make no mistake they ARE migrants to the region just like the Han.
    In any event the moral outrage is comical. Remind me how the US came into being again? When westerners pack up and leave the Americas along with Australia and New Zealand and return to Europe then maybe you can complain against the Han in Tibet. But it still wouldnt work regarding the Uighurs. Kazaks who are closer to the original habitats do sometimes leave China and go live across the border in Kazakstan. But 5 million remain in China. Uighurs would have to make a far further trek back to Turkey.

    Replies: @Hapalong Cassidy

    There was an ethnic group called the Dzunghars that originally inhabited Xinjiang, until they were genocided by the Qianlong emperor in the 18th century. The Uyghurs moved in after that.

  • Lee Kuan Yew, Singapore’s founding father and long-time prime minister (1959–1990), should be a role model for nationalists across the West. Lee was not a philosopher but a practical politician, so his insights are not theoretical but the product of three decades of leadership. Lee was able to adapt to changing circumstances, eliminate Communist threats,...
  • @Malla
    @NiceNÅ«r


    Sikh is Religion not racial demarcation.
    I know for a fact Sikh have no association with kalleyPilley.
    �
    Wow how raceeest!!! You say Sikhs are not a race and then you say Sikhs want nothing to do with Kalleypilley or dark Tamils?? Are you on ganja?

    OTWhat kind of gender nonbinary name is malla anyway
    �
    Your name "NiceNÅ«r" sounds the perfect name for a call-girl escort. Nice Nur-Jahan. I respect your profession, I am not judgemental.

    Replies: @NiceNÅ«r

    Maybe I’m tirathankar: ur profanity is illegal and disgusting plus wrecks ur pseudo-political prose .
    Classic “hindoo deceit†noted & lamented by “dr†Elst an admitted Neanderthal- new inder- nothing wrong with primordial inder-

    Judging is excellent- man is known by company he keeps- u r grad of indo*Catholicxtian Convent school detritus = jew schül – it’s obvious-

  • Despite LKY’s politically necessitated “authoritarianism” , during the transition between British departure and full ” controlled” Democracy , LKY asked the senior British Govt legal official , the Earl of Selkirk , to verify that all political prisoners were in good shape.

    Selkirk visited a temporarily imprisoned lawyer of Sri Lankan descent and , in the style made popular by Hollywood’s depiction of Englishmen asked the Colombo native if he was being treated properly :

    “Well no , I have no radio in this cell.”

    ” I’m afraid that sort of thing is not allowed”

    ” But I only wish to listen to the Cricket”

    ‘ Ah , that is an entirely different matter, it might be possible.”

    •ï¿½Thanks: littlereddot
  • @Bill Jones
    Good piece but the "Low cost of living in Singapore" surprised me.

    https://www.expatistan.com/cost-of-living/singapore?currency=USD


    Summary of cost of living in Singapore

    Family of four estimated monthly costs: $6,357 (SGD $8,584)
    Single person estimated monthly costs: $3,947 (SGD $5,329)
    Singapore is the 2nd most expensive city in Asia (2 out of 13)
    Cost of living in Singapore is more expensive than in 91% of cities in the World (15 out of 157)
    �

    Replies: @littlereddot

    Good piece but the “Low cost of living in Singapore†surprised me.

    The interesting thing about Singapore, is that you can have either extreme. That chart is applicable if you live like an average Singaporean without fancy tastes.

    If you don’t mind slumming it, you can get by with very little. If however you have a taste for the fancy stuff, then Singapore can be as expensive as anywhere else. This is something that I found differs greatly from the USA, where the differential between the low and high end markets are not so stark.

    For example in Sg, you can go eat a simple noodle dish at a no frills street food kind of place for $3, or you can cross the street to the mall and have exactly the same thing in air-conditioned food court for $6, or you could walk down the mall to mid range restaurant and have that same thing for $15. Then if you go two floors up in the same mall to a more upmarket place, they prices increase in the same orders of magnitude.

    You can ride the subway for $1 or you can buy a 1.5 litre Honda Accord for $120,000. A 2 litre Mercedes E class would start from $200, 000 (and that is with a license to own the for 10 years, and petrol prices are $8 a gallon, and I am not even adding other incidentals like road taxes, inspection fees, mandatory insurances etc)

    Certain things in Singapore are inescapably high. Cars as mentioned are one, they are on average 4 to 5 X what they cost in the US to buy, and much higher to run.

    Housing prices also high. A pre-owned no frills public housing apartment of 2 bedrooms and 780 square feet in size will sell for upwards of $260, 000. This is about the lowest priced property one can buy. If one has fancier tastes, then consider paying prices on par with downtown SF or NYC.

    If one is so inclined, he can manage to live in Singapore quite inexpensively if he avoids the outrageously priced big ticket items. Otherwise, it is really the Crazy Rich Asians.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Alrenous
    @littlereddot

    How's the crime, though?

    You can get some very satisfyingly cheap places in Americoid cities. Excellent value for money - except you're living around inconsiderate assholes and outright criminals. The architecture and infrastructure are more than enough, and the people would benefit from a dose of guillotine. Hope you have a plan for bed bugs - no, that's not an exaggeration.

    Are low-end Singaporean neighbours loud and obnoxious? Will you get your bike stolen? Are the landlords impossible to deal with?

    P.S. Fun fact: you have a near-genetic memory of how bed bugs smell. You don't need to learn. If it smells like bugs, it's because you have bugs.
  • @Bill Jones
    @Malla


    saying something like what you wrote, with the same tenor, would be easily considered racist in the West.
    �
    Only by all the wrong people.

    Replies: @littlereddot

    Only by all the wrong people.

    Quite right.

    Even in the within West, the hypersensitivity to perceived racism varies between societies and differing segments of society.

    I find Brits generally much more down to earth and relaxed when discussing race matters.

    Americans, and especially those on the left leaning are terrified of saying anything that might be construed as racist. I gather this was not so pronounced in the past, but I think it is getting worse as time goes by.

    I once attended a party in Florida maybe 6 to 8 years back, where there a mix of left and right leaning folks. We were having light hearted chat and I joked that I was yellow. A joke like this where I come from in SE Asia would be perceived exactly as just a joke. But when I said the same thing to my American acquaintances, they all turned paler than white, and there was a total awkward silence….LOL.

    I think the US has become hypersensitive on race matters. Everybody seems to be on edge, and just as many people use race to clobber each other. Blacks use it on whites, Whites use it on blacks…around and around it goes.

    I hope they get over it soon.

  • @Malla
    @nebulafox

    Thanks, I agree with everything you wrote, but saying something like what you wrote, with the same tenor, would be easily considered racist in the West.

    Replies: @Bill Jones

    saying something like what you wrote, with the same tenor, would be easily considered racist in the West.

    Only by all the wrong people.

    •ï¿½Replies: @littlereddot
    @Bill Jones


    Only by all the wrong people.
    �
    Quite right.

    Even in the within West, the hypersensitivity to perceived racism varies between societies and differing segments of society.

    I find Brits generally much more down to earth and relaxed when discussing race matters.

    Americans, and especially those on the left leaning are terrified of saying anything that might be construed as racist. I gather this was not so pronounced in the past, but I think it is getting worse as time goes by.

    I once attended a party in Florida maybe 6 to 8 years back, where there a mix of left and right leaning folks. We were having light hearted chat and I joked that I was yellow. A joke like this where I come from in SE Asia would be perceived exactly as just a joke. But when I said the same thing to my American acquaintances, they all turned paler than white, and there was a total awkward silence....LOL.

    I think the US has become hypersensitive on race matters. Everybody seems to be on edge, and just as many people use race to clobber each other. Blacks use it on whites, Whites use it on blacks...around and around it goes.

    I hope they get over it soon.
  • Good piece but the “Low cost of living in Singapore” surprised me.

    https://www.expatistan.com/cost-of-living/singapore?currency=USD

    Summary of cost of living in Singapore

    Family of four estimated monthly costs: $6,357 (SGD $8,584)
    Single person estimated monthly costs: $3,947 (SGD $5,329)
    Singapore is the 2nd most expensive city in Asia (2 out of 13)
    Cost of living in Singapore is more expensive than in 91% of cities in the World (15 out of 157)

    •ï¿½Replies: @littlereddot
    @Bill Jones


    Good piece but the “Low cost of living in Singapore†surprised me.
    �
    The interesting thing about Singapore, is that you can have either extreme. That chart is applicable if you live like an average Singaporean without fancy tastes.

    If you don't mind slumming it, you can get by with very little. If however you have a taste for the fancy stuff, then Singapore can be as expensive as anywhere else. This is something that I found differs greatly from the USA, where the differential between the low and high end markets are not so stark.

    For example in Sg, you can go eat a simple noodle dish at a no frills street food kind of place for $3, or you can cross the street to the mall and have exactly the same thing in air-conditioned food court for $6, or you could walk down the mall to mid range restaurant and have that same thing for $15. Then if you go two floors up in the same mall to a more upmarket place, they prices increase in the same orders of magnitude.

    You can ride the subway for $1 or you can buy a 1.5 litre Honda Accord for $120,000. A 2 litre Mercedes E class would start from $200, 000 (and that is with a license to own the for 10 years, and petrol prices are $8 a gallon, and I am not even adding other incidentals like road taxes, inspection fees, mandatory insurances etc)

    Certain things in Singapore are inescapably high. Cars as mentioned are one, they are on average 4 to 5 X what they cost in the US to buy, and much higher to run.

    Housing prices also high. A pre-owned no frills public housing apartment of 2 bedrooms and 780 square feet in size will sell for upwards of $260, 000. This is about the lowest priced property one can buy. If one has fancier tastes, then consider paying prices on par with downtown SF or NYC.

    If one is so inclined, he can manage to live in Singapore quite inexpensively if he avoids the outrageously priced big ticket items. Otherwise, it is really the Crazy Rich Asians.

    Replies: @Alrenous
  • @Malla
    @ivan


    Socialism in my opinion is a necessary stage – clean water, good schools, universal healthcare – in the development of nations. The main problem with it, is that after one or two generations, the administrators become corrupt and lazy as they are in India.
    �
    I agree, in a post Industrial revolution society, social development needs to precedes economic development. However you gotta check what the Swatantra party after Independence was saying. you know Minoo Masani (who was earlier a firebrand labour union leader) or Rajagopalachari. That the Government should leave Steel production, coal, garments etc... to the private sector and concentrate on education and healthcare because these PSUs of Public Sector Units or Government run companies could become capital sinks and we would end up losing a lot of money in these and have less money for social development and that is what happened. Anyways I do not blame Nehru like the nationalist crowd, he did do a lot of good, built lots of heavy industries many a times with Soviet help, IITs, ISRO etc... He did do a lot but today's youth blaming him for "destroying the country via socialism" is basically they are looking for a scapegoat.
    Anyways, Nehru was a Fabián socialist, he eventually wanted Communism but using a more slow incremental method, not the revolutionary method used in Russia or China.

    From the early days of the October Revolution, Nehru closely followed the socialist transformations in Soviet Russia, Nehru studied the works of Marx and Lenin which, by his own admission, substantially influenced his views on the ways and laws of world social development. In doing so, as Nehru pointed out in one of his articles, he was deeply impressed in those years by Lenin’s work, Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism, and the book written by the American journalist, John Reed, Ten Days That Shook the World.

    Later, Nehru wrote the following about that period: “We began a new phase in our struggle for freedom in India at about the same time as the October Revolution led by the great Lenin. We admired Lenin whose example influenced us greatly.†In November 1927, Jawaharlal Nehru, together with his father Motilal Nehru, was invited by the USSR Society for Cultural Relations with Foreign Countries to attend the celebrations of the Tenth Anniversary of the October Revolution. On November 7, 1927, Jawaharlal Nehru together with his father, wife and sister set his foot on Soviet soil for the first time at the small border station of Negoreloye. It is surprising how a multimillionaire of that time, the rich barrister Motilal Nehru (Nehru's dad) was treated as a great guest in Soviet Russia while millions of poor were suffering in inhuman conditions in Soviet gulags. Strange, eh?

    Jawaharlal Nehru was received in the Kremlin by Mikhail Kalinin, Chairman of the Central Executive Committee of the USSR. Nehru visited several factories and plants, attended Moscow court proceedings, went to the museum of the October Revolution, the Bolshoi Theatre, and saw V. Pudovkin’s film, “The End of Saint-Petersburgâ€. On November 8, Nehru took part in a festive meeting devoted to the Tenth Anniversary of the October Revolution, held in the Trade Union House. Here is what I was told by Professor Vladimir Balabushevich, a famous Indologist: “Nehru was a little late for the meeting. Nevertheless, when Jawaharlal Nehru and his father, Motilal Nehru, made their appearance in the hall and were introduced to the audience by the Chairman of the meeting, all those present in the hall rose and gave them a warm welcoming ovation. Already at that time, Jawaharlal Nehru was regarded as an outstanding fighter against imperialism and colonialism.â€

    Replies: @ivan

    As always you are a font of knowledge. Thanks for these hardly known anecdotes; they illuminate the whole.

    •ï¿½Thanks: Malla
  • @Truth
    @Marshal Marlow

    Yes:

    But then he was a 5'4 Chinese guy. So was ultra-liberal, Andrew Yang.

    Replies: @36 ulster

    But not ultra-liberal enough for today’s Democrats.

  • @nebulafox
    @Malla

    As an on-and-off Singapore/Malaysia expat, I'll give my take on this:

    1) The Chinese work ethic and emphasis on material success really is no joke. It. Is. No. Joke. By contrast, Malays are a lot more likely to be content with what they have in life. Islam reinforces this attitude, but I think the true core of this is the indigenous culture underneath. So at the core, you have fundamentally different cultural priorities. And as always, there's no free lunch. Yeah, the Chinese are richer, but they are also the ones struggling to reproduce.

    2) Also, in Chinese culture, you project dissatisfaction and anger outward. In Malay culture, you project it inward and keep a placid exterior.

    3) Singaporean Malays have their problems-it's well known that most drug addicts or people who do "outrage crimes" (like pimping your wife) are Malay and that they perform less well educationally. But in broad strokes, they function just fine in Singaporean society. Especially when lined up against their Malaysian/Indonesian counterparts, their "Singaporeanization" really does become apparent. It goes without saying there is nothing remotely approximating the levels of social dysfunction found the among the black urban underclass in the United States.

    4) In Malaysia, the Malays are the majority and are favored by active legal discrimination that hobbles Malaysia to this day. Mahathir's intention was that this would be temporary until he "changed the culture" to make it more competitive (he came from the same Darwinian thought world as LKY did), but just ask Augustus how tinkering with the Gracchian free bread dole went... once given, not easily taken away. It took the fall of Rome in the West and the imminent Slav/Persian siege in the East to end it, over 400 and 600 years later respectively.

    Interestingly, the criminal underworld is dominated by ethnic Indians. (Though again-nothing remotely approximating the sheer degree of social rot seen in US.) They are hit by the bumi laws as much as the ethnic Chinese, but lack the resources or wealth to cope or flee. By contrast, Singaporean Indians are per capita wealthier than Singaporean Chinese. So, as always in life, there's a heavy degree of contingency. I've grown increasingly skeptical of "theories of everything" as I've aged. It's local, recent factors that usually dominate.

    Replies: @jeff stryker, @littlereddot, @boy1988, @Malla

    Thanks, I agree with everything you wrote, but saying something like what you wrote, with the same tenor, would be easily considered racist in the West.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Bill Jones
    @Malla


    saying something like what you wrote, with the same tenor, would be easily considered racist in the West.
    �
    Only by all the wrong people.

    Replies: @littlereddot
  • Malla says:
    @ivan
    @Malla

    Socialist Lanskian Nehruvian India I think you refer to the influence of Harold Laski - the famous economist at the LSE. In point of fact, both Lee Kuan Yew and Goh Keng Swee - the other man behind the economic miracle of Singapore, referred to him favourably. (GKS was in fact a junior lecturer at the LSE after the war). Socialism in my opinion is a necessary stage - clean water, good schools, universal healthcare - in the development of nations. The main problem with it, is that after one or two generations, the administrators become corrupt and lazy as they are in India. Socialism, for its sustained execution requires a higher morality from the administrators - but which everywhere is eroded in time. LKY foresaw this, which is the main reason why he undertook to pay the civil servants and ministers at a sustained higher level. In fact he derided those among his colleagues, who were opposed to this on account of their belief that one should serve not for money, but for a higher purpose as being infected with the "Long March Syndrome". A ruthlessly pragmatic man, he saw that men will in time become more concerned with their own affairs, than with the well-being of the state. Nehru the idealist, did not prepare for that outcome.

    Until I read Salman Rushdie's "The Moors Last Sigh", some decades ago I did not know of the modern slavery in Pakistan under the aegis of the feudal system there. is it any wonder that those who exploit the lower classes with the "opium of religion", Islam in Pakistan, Hinduism in India fan the flames of fanaticism for their own advantage.

    Replies: @Malla

    Socialism in my opinion is a necessary stage – clean water, good schools, universal healthcare – in the development of nations. The main problem with it, is that after one or two generations, the administrators become corrupt and lazy as they are in India.

    I agree, in a post Industrial revolution society, social development needs to precedes economic development. However you gotta check what the Swatantra party after Independence was saying. you know Minoo Masani (who was earlier a firebrand labour union leader) or Rajagopalachari. That the Government should leave Steel production, coal, garments etc… to the private sector and concentrate on education and healthcare because these PSUs of Public Sector Units or Government run companies could become capital sinks and we would end up losing a lot of money in these and have less money for social development and that is what happened. Anyways I do not blame Nehru like the nationalist crowd, he did do a lot of good, built lots of heavy industries many a times with Soviet help, IITs, ISRO etc… He did do a lot but today’s youth blaming him for “destroying the country via socialism” is basically they are looking for a scapegoat.
    Anyways, Nehru was a Fabián socialist, he eventually wanted Communism but using a more slow incremental method, not the revolutionary method used in Russia or China.

    From the early days of the October Revolution, Nehru closely followed the socialist transformations in Soviet Russia, Nehru studied the works of Marx and Lenin which, by his own admission, substantially influenced his views on the ways and laws of world social development. In doing so, as Nehru pointed out in one of his articles, he was deeply impressed in those years by Lenin’s work, Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism, and the book written by the American journalist, John Reed, Ten Days That Shook the World.

    Later, Nehru wrote the following about that period: “We began a new phase in our struggle for freedom in India at about the same time as the October Revolution led by the great Lenin. We admired Lenin whose example influenced us greatly.†In November 1927, Jawaharlal Nehru, together with his father Motilal Nehru, was invited by the USSR Society for Cultural Relations with Foreign Countries to attend the celebrations of the Tenth Anniversary of the October Revolution. On November 7, 1927, Jawaharlal Nehru together with his father, wife and sister set his foot on Soviet soil for the first time at the small border station of Negoreloye. It is surprising how a multimillionaire of that time, the rich barrister Motilal Nehru (Nehru’s dad) was treated as a great guest in Soviet Russia while millions of poor were suffering in inhuman conditions in Soviet gulags. Strange, eh?

    Jawaharlal Nehru was received in the Kremlin by Mikhail Kalinin, Chairman of the Central Executive Committee of the USSR. Nehru visited several factories and plants, attended Moscow court proceedings, went to the museum of the October Revolution, the Bolshoi Theatre, and saw V. Pudovkin’s film, “The End of Saint-Petersburgâ€. On November 8, Nehru took part in a festive meeting devoted to the Tenth Anniversary of the October Revolution, held in the Trade Union House. Here is what I was told by Professor Vladimir Balabushevich, a famous Indologist: “Nehru was a little late for the meeting. Nevertheless, when Jawaharlal Nehru and his father, Motilal Nehru, made their appearance in the hall and were introduced to the audience by the Chairman of the meeting, all those present in the hall rose and gave them a warm welcoming ovation. Already at that time, Jawaharlal Nehru was regarded as an outstanding fighter against imperialism and colonialism.â€

    •ï¿½Replies: @ivan
    @Malla

    As always you are a font of knowledge. Thanks for these hardly known anecdotes; they illuminate the whole.
  • @Hacienda
    @anon

    That's awesome video. The Chinese girls are gorgeous. Lithe, and floating.

    Leave the (screaming) West behind. Jeez.

    Replies: @Marshal Marlow

    I love this kind of video – just straight-forward observations by a middle class person with no political agenda or correctness etc.

    The shots on the train seemed to be taken with her mobile phone so I assume they’re legitimate rather than staged. Those women were elf-like, so tall, with good skin, great posture and well dressed. Not a burger fed pasty faced fatty to be seen.

    Amazing what a few generations without famine and a good supply of healthy food can do for a civilisation.

  • The Englishman KNOWS??????? The Englishman BELIEVES in his superiority over us Celts, in his heart or more southerly locales. I admire LKY more than any statesman, real or imagined, living or dead, but that belief made me laugh amusedly. That superiority may have been true until about a century ago, before 1/7/1916, but there seems to have been a regression to the mean–and what a mean regression it’s been, if you follow the essays of Anthony Daniels, a/k/a Theodore Dalrymple, who surveys the dystopia from his Paris Arrondissement between forays to the UK. That said, kudos to Lee Kuan Yew–and to M. Durocher for this excellent article.

  • @nebulafox
    @boy1988

    >You should worry about Muslim Malays plotting to bomb important venues and commit mass murder in the name of religion.

    The Singaporean government takes the threat of Islamic radicalism very seriously. Guest workers from Muslim countries who show any sign of being a problem are swiftly dealt with. Imams are all state approved. The local Malay community is oddly conservative in some ways compared to their Malaysian counterparts (that's what happens when you have a Muslim minority that stands out), but they are largely loyal to the Singaporean state and often take a withering view on their AA imbibing co-ethnics across the border.

    (It's basically like ethnic Italians in Switzerland vis a vis the Germans: they'll gripe and crack jokes about the stick-in-the-mud majority race, but are under no illusions about whether a society dominated by them is smoother and more functional.)

    Replies: @jeff stryker, @boy1988, @littlereddot

    but they are largely loyal to the Singaporean state and often take a withering view on their AA imbibing co-ethnics across the border.

    Very astute observation. I too have noticed this.

    I think this phenomenon is very widespread where ethnicities are spread across national borders. From personal and other people’s observations, Asian people in the USA also exhibit this behaviour towards co-ethnics from Asia. We have noticed a certain condescension when Asian Americans meet other Asian people they perceive are from outside the USA.

    Funnily enough, I and others from my circle in Singapore seem to have had the best experiences in the USA with the Black folk and the worst experiences with the Asian Americans.

  • @jeff stryker
    @littlereddot

    Red Dot


    I don't want to descend to Sammy's Cafe patrons level of silliness (Though obviously white people use the site to find hookers) but yours is typical of left brained chimpout.

    It is why we worry about you having nuclear weapons even more than Indians or why white people feel their countries should be the only ones with nuclear weapons.

    You have been given information that is outside your left-brained logic & you are having an Asberger's chimpout.

    ...But let me be clear. I do not know Singapore. I know other parts of SEA of course. Not Singapore.

    Replies: @littlereddot

    …But let me be clear. I do not know Singapore. I know other parts of SEA of course. Not Singapore

    Oh finally an admission that you do not know Singapore after being called out umpteen times while trying to pose as an expert.

    So now you still cling on to being an expert in “other parts of SEA”? You have been called out. I doubt if your “knowledge” of other parts of SEA or the rest of the world holds much water. It is likely to be equally superficial and skewed to grotesqueness.

    I would take the opinions of your esteemed countryman Nebulafox seriously. But your opinions?….. it is to be regarded like a used enema.

  • boy1988 says:
    @nebulafox
    @boy1988

    >You should worry about Muslim Malays plotting to bomb important venues and commit mass murder in the name of religion.

    The Singaporean government takes the threat of Islamic radicalism very seriously. Guest workers from Muslim countries who show any sign of being a problem are swiftly dealt with. Imams are all state approved. The local Malay community is oddly conservative in some ways compared to their Malaysian counterparts (that's what happens when you have a Muslim minority that stands out), but they are largely loyal to the Singaporean state and often take a withering view on their AA imbibing co-ethnics across the border.

    (It's basically like ethnic Italians in Switzerland vis a vis the Germans: they'll gripe and crack jokes about the stick-in-the-mud majority race, but are under no illusions about whether a society dominated by them is smoother and more functional.)

    Replies: @jeff stryker, @boy1988, @littlereddot

    Are you saying that Singaporean Malays are much more conservative than the ones in Malaysia?I would have to disagree on that

    Have you ever noticed how many Malay Muslim youngsters in Singapore have tattoos? A Malay in Malaysia who does that would draw flaks and worse isolated from families and neighbours.That doesn’t mean there are no tattooed Malay Muslim in Malaysia but they are a rare sight

    Also go to any swimming pools in Singapore and you’ll notice some Muslim Malay would be wearing a two piece swimsuit.Meanwhile in Malaysia it’s a female with towels in their head and loose clothing .lol

    If I’m not mistaken there are some restrictions placed on Malay officers in the Singaporean military especially air force and armoured vehicle division.Cant blame the authorities but you cant really trust them should a war break out between Singapore with Malaysia or Indonesia.

    What happened in the battle of Surabaya during the Indonesian war for independence .( Happened between Brit forces and Indo guerrillas because Dutch ask the Brits to deal with those indos.Dutch were seriously fucked by Hitler back home) serves as a reminder.Indian Muslim soldiers hearing snackbar quickly switch sides.

  • @littlereddot
    @boy1988

    I can't tell about things that I am not familiar with. But with nonsense he spews about Singapore, I can tell that he has at most a superficial knowledge. And the few facts that he knows about, he skews them into a most grotesque reading.

    As other readers here have pointed out, what he writes about seems calculated to impress people without knowledge of the region.

    Judging from how he totally misreads stuff about Singapore, I have no choice but to take what he says about anything else with a large handful of salt.

    I do commend you for your patience and tolerance when dealing with him. I unfortunately have difficulty suffering fools. I would never make a good teacher.

    Replies: @jeff stryker

    Red Dot

    I don’t want to descend to Sammy’s Cafe patrons level of silliness (Though obviously white people use the site to find hookers) but yours is typical of left brained chimpout.

    It is why we worry about you having nuclear weapons even more than Indians or why white people feel their countries should be the only ones with nuclear weapons.

    You have been given information that is outside your left-brained logic & you are having an Asberger’s chimpout.

    …But let me be clear. I do not know Singapore. I know other parts of SEA of course. Not Singapore.

    •ï¿½Replies: @littlereddot
    @jeff stryker


    …But let me be clear. I do not know Singapore. I know other parts of SEA of course. Not Singapore
    �
    Oh finally an admission that you do not know Singapore after being called out umpteen times while trying to pose as an expert.

    So now you still cling on to being an expert in "other parts of SEA"? You have been called out. I doubt if your "knowledge" of other parts of SEA or the rest of the world holds much water. It is likely to be equally superficial and skewed to grotesqueness.

    I would take the opinions of your esteemed countryman Nebulafox seriously. But your opinions?..... it is to be regarded like a used enema.
  • @nebulafox
    @boy1988

    >You should worry about Muslim Malays plotting to bomb important venues and commit mass murder in the name of religion.

    The Singaporean government takes the threat of Islamic radicalism very seriously. Guest workers from Muslim countries who show any sign of being a problem are swiftly dealt with. Imams are all state approved. The local Malay community is oddly conservative in some ways compared to their Malaysian counterparts (that's what happens when you have a Muslim minority that stands out), but they are largely loyal to the Singaporean state and often take a withering view on their AA imbibing co-ethnics across the border.

    (It's basically like ethnic Italians in Switzerland vis a vis the Germans: they'll gripe and crack jokes about the stick-in-the-mud majority race, but are under no illusions about whether a society dominated by them is smoother and more functional.)

    Replies: @jeff stryker, @boy1988, @littlereddot

    As far as Muslim terrorism is concerned this is what makes lunatics who accused the USA or “Five Eyes” of being responsible for the 1999 anti-Chinese riots in Indonesia of being so crazy.

    The Chinese suppress terrorism in many ways (Investment, creating middle class jobs, infrastructure) which discourage recruitment.

    Why would the CIA want them dead in Indonesia? Makes zero sense.

    also, when reading “:Sammy’s Alfreesco” which whites use to find prostitutes in Singapore but functions as a forum otherwise you realize that Indians & Chinese have no love lost for one another in Singapore. They would not in any society.

    The only Chinese who love Indians in Singapore sell deodorant because Chinese have no body odor.

    As races they are opposites.

    Wars don’t break out between advanced races & unadvanced. The advanced are too well organized.

    Also, Tamils have a fanatic extremist gene. It is in their DNA.

  • @boy1988
    @littlereddot

    He may sound like a nutcase but hey hes right about some of the stuff that he spews out

    Replies: @littlereddot

    I can’t tell about things that I am not familiar with. But with nonsense he spews about Singapore, I can tell that he has at most a superficial knowledge. And the few facts that he knows about, he skews them into a most grotesque reading.

    As other readers here have pointed out, what he writes about seems calculated to impress people without knowledge of the region.

    Judging from how he totally misreads stuff about Singapore, I have no choice but to take what he says about anything else with a large handful of salt.

    I do commend you for your patience and tolerance when dealing with him. I unfortunately have difficulty suffering fools. I would never make a good teacher.

    •ï¿½Agree: boy1988
    •ï¿½Replies: @jeff stryker
    @littlereddot

    Red Dot


    I don't want to descend to Sammy's Cafe patrons level of silliness (Though obviously white people use the site to find hookers) but yours is typical of left brained chimpout.

    It is why we worry about you having nuclear weapons even more than Indians or why white people feel their countries should be the only ones with nuclear weapons.

    You have been given information that is outside your left-brained logic & you are having an Asberger's chimpout.

    ...But let me be clear. I do not know Singapore. I know other parts of SEA of course. Not Singapore.

    Replies: @littlereddot
  • @boy1988
    @jeff stryker

    The 2013 riot was not a race riot.Its just some blue collar foreign workers who happened to come from South India.

    They were furious after they got to know their fellow compatriot who was intoxicated was poorly handled which resulted in his death due to traffic accident.None of the rioters were Singaporean citizen or PR holders.

    Those kind of protest by foreign workers do happen occasionally in neighbouring Malaysia and Thailand .In a way riots and protest like this is just to show that they demand justice and fair treatment by the employers and authorities in their host country.

    I won't worry about Indians waging a civil war in Singapore since it just doesn't make any sense at all.You should worry about Muslim Malays plotting to bomb important venues and commit mass murder in the name of religion.

    Ethnic tension is common in Singapore but in real life they just pretend it never happened.Usually they'll just head to the many Singaporean forums like sammyboy (Sam's alfresco section) to show their hatred of certain groups .

    Replies: @nebulafox

    >You should worry about Muslim Malays plotting to bomb important venues and commit mass murder in the name of religion.

    The Singaporean government takes the threat of Islamic radicalism very seriously. Guest workers from Muslim countries who show any sign of being a problem are swiftly dealt with. Imams are all state approved. The local Malay community is oddly conservative in some ways compared to their Malaysian counterparts (that’s what happens when you have a Muslim minority that stands out), but they are largely loyal to the Singaporean state and often take a withering view on their AA imbibing co-ethnics across the border.

    (It’s basically like ethnic Italians in Switzerland vis a vis the Germans: they’ll gripe and crack jokes about the stick-in-the-mud majority race, but are under no illusions about whether a society dominated by them is smoother and more functional.)

    •ï¿½Replies: @jeff stryker
    @nebulafox

    As far as Muslim terrorism is concerned this is what makes lunatics who accused the USA or "Five Eyes" of being responsible for the 1999 anti-Chinese riots in Indonesia of being so crazy.

    The Chinese suppress terrorism in many ways (Investment, creating middle class jobs, infrastructure) which discourage recruitment.

    Why would the CIA want them dead in Indonesia? Makes zero sense.


    also, when reading ":Sammy's Alfreesco" which whites use to find prostitutes in Singapore but functions as a forum otherwise you realize that Indians & Chinese have no love lost for one another in Singapore. They would not in any society.

    The only Chinese who love Indians in Singapore sell deodorant because Chinese have no body odor.

    As races they are opposites.

    Wars don't break out between advanced races & unadvanced. The advanced are too well organized.

    Also, Tamils have a fanatic extremist gene. It is in their DNA.
    , @boy1988
    @nebulafox

    Are you saying that Singaporean Malays are much more conservative than the ones in Malaysia?I would have to disagree on that

    Have you ever noticed how many Malay Muslim youngsters in Singapore have tattoos? A Malay in Malaysia who does that would draw flaks and worse isolated from families and neighbours.That doesn't mean there are no tattooed Malay Muslim in Malaysia but they are a rare sight

    Also go to any swimming pools in Singapore and you'll notice some Muslim Malay would be wearing a two piece swimsuit.Meanwhile in Malaysia it's a female with towels in their head and loose clothing .lol

    If I'm not mistaken there are some restrictions placed on Malay officers in the Singaporean military especially air force and armoured vehicle division.Cant blame the authorities but you cant really trust them should a war break out between Singapore with Malaysia or Indonesia.

    What happened in the battle of Surabaya during the Indonesian war for independence .( Happened between Brit forces and Indo guerrillas because Dutch ask the Brits to deal with those indos.Dutch were seriously fucked by Hitler back home) serves as a reminder.Indian Muslim soldiers hearing snackbar quickly switch sides.
    , @littlereddot
    @nebulafox


    but they are largely loyal to the Singaporean state and often take a withering view on their AA imbibing co-ethnics across the border.
    �
    Very astute observation. I too have noticed this.

    I think this phenomenon is very widespread where ethnicities are spread across national borders. From personal and other people's observations, Asian people in the USA also exhibit this behaviour towards co-ethnics from Asia. We have noticed a certain condescension when Asian Americans meet other Asian people they perceive are from outside the USA.

    Funnily enough, I and others from my circle in Singapore seem to have had the best experiences in the USA with the Black folk and the worst experiences with the Asian Americans.
  • @jeff stryker
    @nebulafox

    The last race riots in 2013 were in Little India.

    I don't think that the Malays in Singapore have their act together as a group to wage an effective resistence & don't outnumber Chinese but the Indians could be formidable adversaries.

    Anyhow, the Tamilian issues seem to be booze & this could be that lower-caste South Indians are basically Australian aboriginals. However, they are smarter cousins, maybe due to a genetic bottleneck at some point & could wage civil war in Singapore while the Malays are just too laidback.

    Replies: @boy1988, @littlereddot, @nebulafox

    >The last race riots in 2013 were in Little India.

    That riot involve foreign guest workers from Bangladesh (right next to historical Little India is a “Little Dhaka” of sorts where the guest workers go to remit money and get Bangla food on their days off) and India, not local ethnic Indians. The latter relate to the former not at all.

    (Human beings are, as always, human beings. One funny anecdote: Singapore had an issue in the 1980s with local Tamils being sympathetic to the Tamil Tigers. But then, in 1980s Boston, Whitey Bulger was shipping arms to the IRA from sympathetic Americans of Irish extraction: I suspect this was on the same level of identification. Sympathy, but not to the extent that it erased American/Singaporean identity, respectively.)

    When I say that the main fault line is between Chinese and Malays, I’m talking more in a historical sense that lingers on in some inertial ways-the military, for example-more than anything else. To the extent that there is a practical divide in Singaporean society today (and this is Singapore, aka, this is very mild stuff compared to most of the world), it’s between native Singaporeans and recent arrivals from the PRC, who got subjected to polar opposite social conditioning in the 1970s. LKY fined and caned “peasant” behavior out of the Singaporean Han. The Cultural Revolution on the mainland forcibly installed it at all strata of society.

  • @littlereddot
    @jeff stryker

    More and more, I am starting to believe you are an escapee from the nuthouse.

    Replies: @boy1988

    He may sound like a nutcase but hey hes right about some of the stuff that he spews out

    •ï¿½Replies: @littlereddot
    @boy1988

    I can't tell about things that I am not familiar with. But with nonsense he spews about Singapore, I can tell that he has at most a superficial knowledge. And the few facts that he knows about, he skews them into a most grotesque reading.

    As other readers here have pointed out, what he writes about seems calculated to impress people without knowledge of the region.

    Judging from how he totally misreads stuff about Singapore, I have no choice but to take what he says about anything else with a large handful of salt.

    I do commend you for your patience and tolerance when dealing with him. I unfortunately have difficulty suffering fools. I would never make a good teacher.

    Replies: @jeff stryker
  • @jeff stryker
    @nebulafox

    The last race riots in 2013 were in Little India.

    I don't think that the Malays in Singapore have their act together as a group to wage an effective resistence & don't outnumber Chinese but the Indians could be formidable adversaries.

    Anyhow, the Tamilian issues seem to be booze & this could be that lower-caste South Indians are basically Australian aboriginals. However, they are smarter cousins, maybe due to a genetic bottleneck at some point & could wage civil war in Singapore while the Malays are just too laidback.

    Replies: @boy1988, @littlereddot, @nebulafox

    More and more, I am starting to believe you are an escapee from the nuthouse.

    •ï¿½Replies: @boy1988
    @littlereddot

    He may sound like a nutcase but hey hes right about some of the stuff that he spews out

    Replies: @littlereddot
  • @jeff stryker
    @nebulafox

    The last race riots in 2013 were in Little India.

    I don't think that the Malays in Singapore have their act together as a group to wage an effective resistence & don't outnumber Chinese but the Indians could be formidable adversaries.

    Anyhow, the Tamilian issues seem to be booze & this could be that lower-caste South Indians are basically Australian aboriginals. However, they are smarter cousins, maybe due to a genetic bottleneck at some point & could wage civil war in Singapore while the Malays are just too laidback.

    Replies: @boy1988, @littlereddot, @nebulafox

    The 2013 riot was not a race riot.Its just some blue collar foreign workers who happened to come from South India.

    They were furious after they got to know their fellow compatriot who was intoxicated was poorly handled which resulted in his death due to traffic accident.None of the rioters were Singaporean citizen or PR holders.

    Those kind of protest by foreign workers do happen occasionally in neighbouring Malaysia and Thailand .In a way riots and protest like this is just to show that they demand justice and fair treatment by the employers and authorities in their host country.

    I won’t worry about Indians waging a civil war in Singapore since it just doesn’t make any sense at all.You should worry about Muslim Malays plotting to bomb important venues and commit mass murder in the name of religion.

    Ethnic tension is common in Singapore but in real life they just pretend it never happened.Usually they’ll just head to the many Singaporean forums like sammyboy (Sam’s alfresco section) to show their hatred of certain groups .

    •ï¿½Replies: @nebulafox
    @boy1988

    >You should worry about Muslim Malays plotting to bomb important venues and commit mass murder in the name of religion.

    The Singaporean government takes the threat of Islamic radicalism very seriously. Guest workers from Muslim countries who show any sign of being a problem are swiftly dealt with. Imams are all state approved. The local Malay community is oddly conservative in some ways compared to their Malaysian counterparts (that's what happens when you have a Muslim minority that stands out), but they are largely loyal to the Singaporean state and often take a withering view on their AA imbibing co-ethnics across the border.

    (It's basically like ethnic Italians in Switzerland vis a vis the Germans: they'll gripe and crack jokes about the stick-in-the-mud majority race, but are under no illusions about whether a society dominated by them is smoother and more functional.)

    Replies: @jeff stryker, @boy1988, @littlereddot
  • @sher singh
    However, in contrast with Western multiculturalism — which demonizes the white majority’s identity while celebrating identities of all non-whites — Singapore’s multi-racialism celebrates the racial identity of all communities, not least the Chinese majority.

    --
    Do you think a lot of this is because multiculturalism is built into a polytheist spirit, while for the West it's essentially fighting its individualistic and assimilatory tendencies.

    The Chinese don't expect Malays to celebrate the Lunar New Year, but will celebrate Diwali with Indians simply because the Dharmic/Pagan spirit sees the same soul in all, with all religions, festivities being a manifestation of the same divine.

    There's also the small factoid that Chinese, Malays, and Indians don't have a centennial history of trying to subjugate, and scientifically genocide each other under a guise of 'objectivity'. Glad to have you back though, Guillame.

    ਵਾਹਿਗà©à¨°à©‚ਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗà©à¨°à©‚ਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

    Replies: @anon, @RJ Macready, @Azn/Asia/Asian belongs to GOD, @Al Ross

    No , they just benefited from British Empire presence , without which they’d all have remained in their primitive villages.

  • @nebulafox
    @jeff stryker

    I've heard mainland Chinese describe Filipinos to me as "our Mexicans".

    > What was the reason? What did Indonesians actually believe ethnic Chinese had done?

    There was a little thing called the Cultural Revolution going on in China in the 1960s, which promised to wipe out Malay/Indonesian culture and religion (this is the same reason why the ethnic Malays were so keen to back the British against the Communists in 1950s Malaya) entirely so that everybody could be subordinated to the Great Socialist Wave of the future. China was the main backer of the PKI.

    Again: that most Indonesian Chinese would have been considered "capitalist roaders" back home proved irrelevant. That's not excusable. But the association of the PKI with Beijing also didn't come out of nowhere.

    > In mu opinion, the issue in Singapore is Indians & Chinese.

    The issue is between Malays and Chinese, and always has been since the 1940s. Indians are the sideshow.

    Ironically, the main source of tension these days come from immigrants from the PRC, specifically imported to keep Singapore Han dominated. They aren't used to living next to non-Han and their attitudes tend to rub the wrong way for Singaporeans of all races.

    Replies: @jeff stryker

    The last race riots in 2013 were in Little India.

    I don’t think that the Malays in Singapore have their act together as a group to wage an effective resistence & don’t outnumber Chinese but the Indians could be formidable adversaries.

    Anyhow, the Tamilian issues seem to be booze & this could be that lower-caste South Indians are basically Australian aboriginals. However, they are smarter cousins, maybe due to a genetic bottleneck at some point & could wage civil war in Singapore while the Malays are just too laidback.

    •ï¿½Replies: @boy1988
    @jeff stryker

    The 2013 riot was not a race riot.Its just some blue collar foreign workers who happened to come from South India.

    They were furious after they got to know their fellow compatriot who was intoxicated was poorly handled which resulted in his death due to traffic accident.None of the rioters were Singaporean citizen or PR holders.

    Those kind of protest by foreign workers do happen occasionally in neighbouring Malaysia and Thailand .In a way riots and protest like this is just to show that they demand justice and fair treatment by the employers and authorities in their host country.

    I won't worry about Indians waging a civil war in Singapore since it just doesn't make any sense at all.You should worry about Muslim Malays plotting to bomb important venues and commit mass murder in the name of religion.

    Ethnic tension is common in Singapore but in real life they just pretend it never happened.Usually they'll just head to the many Singaporean forums like sammyboy (Sam's alfresco section) to show their hatred of certain groups .

    Replies: @nebulafox
    , @littlereddot
    @jeff stryker

    More and more, I am starting to believe you are an escapee from the nuthouse.

    Replies: @boy1988
    , @nebulafox
    @jeff stryker

    >The last race riots in 2013 were in Little India.

    That riot involve foreign guest workers from Bangladesh (right next to historical Little India is a "Little Dhaka" of sorts where the guest workers go to remit money and get Bangla food on their days off) and India, not local ethnic Indians. The latter relate to the former not at all.

    (Human beings are, as always, human beings. One funny anecdote: Singapore had an issue in the 1980s with local Tamils being sympathetic to the Tamil Tigers. But then, in 1980s Boston, Whitey Bulger was shipping arms to the IRA from sympathetic Americans of Irish extraction: I suspect this was on the same level of identification. Sympathy, but not to the extent that it erased American/Singaporean identity, respectively.)

    When I say that the main fault line is between Chinese and Malays, I'm talking more in a historical sense that lingers on in some inertial ways-the military, for example-more than anything else. To the extent that there is a practical divide in Singaporean society today (and this is Singapore, aka, this is very mild stuff compared to most of the world), it's between native Singaporeans and recent arrivals from the PRC, who got subjected to polar opposite social conditioning in the 1970s. LKY fined and caned "peasant" behavior out of the Singaporean Han. The Cultural Revolution on the mainland forcibly installed it at all strata of society.
  • @boy1988
    @jeff stryker

    Aren't Filipino Chinese more assimilated than Indonesian Chinese? It's practically impossible to find pinoy Chinese conversing in their dialects.the ones in Indonesia may look assimilated at first glance due to their Indonesian sounding names but if you go to Medan ,bangka island and west Kalimantan the Chinese culture is much more livelier compared to the ones in java.hokkien is spoken widely among Chinese in Medan while Hakka is the lingua franca among Chinese in bangka island and singkawang ( west Kalimantan).meanwhile Pontianak also in West Kalimantan is a teochew enclave.there are millions of Filipinos with only a quarter Han ancestry from their great grandparents carrying Chinese surnames and practice no Chinese culture whatsoever and look austro .Those Chinese mixed blood are similar to the ones called cina benteng of Batavia who live in poverty.doubt therell be a mass conflict between Indian and Chinese in singapore.they aren't negroid for God sakes.conflict with low iq Muslim austro is more likely in the future

    Replies: @Al Ross

    Your breathless prose should be subject to a Syn-Tax.

    •ï¿½Agree: boy1988
  • boy1988 says:
    @jeff stryker
    @nebulafox

    Argentina would fall between Brazil & Italy, not that it matters.

    Libraries have been written about Philippines but essentially the Spanish had a practice of marrying local chieftain's daughters called "illustrados" to form alliances-while the British & Dutch outlawed this for fear these mixed-blood elite would revolt which is precisely what happened in Philippines & Latino America.

    Anyhow, as a result, Philippines resembles Latin America with an indifferent Mestizo elite owning most of the land & has a racial caste system run by descendants of Spanish.

    Some will argue that the Philippines did not get enough Chinese & were it 30 percent Chinese like Malaysia it would be Italy to Brazil but I tend to believe like the Taiwanese indigenous the Filipinos would just die out at that point.

    Oddly enough all the Chinese in Philippines do not just come from the Fujian Province but from Amoy in particular.

    One wonders, considering how assimilated the Chinese were in Indonesia, why the locals resented them that much.

    Possibly you or another poster can explain. What was the reason? What did Indonesians actually believe ethnic Chinese had done?

    In mu opinion, the issue in Singapore is Indians & Chinese. At some point, some event will create mass conflict between them & the Malays will do what they always do sitting back & drinking Tapico in a hammock.

    Replies: @nebulafox, @Al Ross, @boy1988

    Aren’t Filipino Chinese more assimilated than Indonesian Chinese? It’s practically impossible to find pinoy Chinese conversing in their dialects.the ones in Indonesia may look assimilated at first glance due to their Indonesian sounding names but if you go to Medan ,bangka island and west Kalimantan the Chinese culture is much more livelier compared to the ones in java.hokkien is spoken widely among Chinese in Medan while Hakka is the lingua franca among Chinese in bangka island and singkawang ( west Kalimantan).meanwhile Pontianak also in West Kalimantan is a teochew enclave.there are millions of Filipinos with only a quarter Han ancestry from their great grandparents carrying Chinese surnames and practice no Chinese culture whatsoever and look austro .Those Chinese mixed blood are similar to the ones called cina benteng of Batavia who live in poverty.doubt therell be a mass conflict between Indian and Chinese in singapore.they aren’t negroid for God sakes.conflict with low iq Muslim austro is more likely in the future

    •ï¿½Replies: @Al Ross
    @boy1988

    Your breathless prose should be subject to a Syn-Tax.
  • @jeff stryker
    @nebulafox

    Argentina would fall between Brazil & Italy, not that it matters.

    Libraries have been written about Philippines but essentially the Spanish had a practice of marrying local chieftain's daughters called "illustrados" to form alliances-while the British & Dutch outlawed this for fear these mixed-blood elite would revolt which is precisely what happened in Philippines & Latino America.

    Anyhow, as a result, Philippines resembles Latin America with an indifferent Mestizo elite owning most of the land & has a racial caste system run by descendants of Spanish.

    Some will argue that the Philippines did not get enough Chinese & were it 30 percent Chinese like Malaysia it would be Italy to Brazil but I tend to believe like the Taiwanese indigenous the Filipinos would just die out at that point.

    Oddly enough all the Chinese in Philippines do not just come from the Fujian Province but from Amoy in particular.

    One wonders, considering how assimilated the Chinese were in Indonesia, why the locals resented them that much.

    Possibly you or another poster can explain. What was the reason? What did Indonesians actually believe ethnic Chinese had done?

    In mu opinion, the issue in Singapore is Indians & Chinese. At some point, some event will create mass conflict between them & the Malays will do what they always do sitting back & drinking Tapico in a hammock.

    Replies: @nebulafox, @Al Ross, @boy1988

    “Oddly enough” ?

    Well if you believe that more Hokkien – speaking Chinese left Fujian’s biggest town because they were near a port , you may also believe that most Irish Ellis Island arrivals departed from Cork for the same geographical reason.

  • @jeff stryker
    @nebulafox

    Argentina would fall between Brazil & Italy, not that it matters.

    Libraries have been written about Philippines but essentially the Spanish had a practice of marrying local chieftain's daughters called "illustrados" to form alliances-while the British & Dutch outlawed this for fear these mixed-blood elite would revolt which is precisely what happened in Philippines & Latino America.

    Anyhow, as a result, Philippines resembles Latin America with an indifferent Mestizo elite owning most of the land & has a racial caste system run by descendants of Spanish.

    Some will argue that the Philippines did not get enough Chinese & were it 30 percent Chinese like Malaysia it would be Italy to Brazil but I tend to believe like the Taiwanese indigenous the Filipinos would just die out at that point.

    Oddly enough all the Chinese in Philippines do not just come from the Fujian Province but from Amoy in particular.

    One wonders, considering how assimilated the Chinese were in Indonesia, why the locals resented them that much.

    Possibly you or another poster can explain. What was the reason? What did Indonesians actually believe ethnic Chinese had done?

    In mu opinion, the issue in Singapore is Indians & Chinese. At some point, some event will create mass conflict between them & the Malays will do what they always do sitting back & drinking Tapico in a hammock.

    Replies: @nebulafox, @Al Ross, @boy1988

    I’ve heard mainland Chinese describe Filipinos to me as “our Mexicans”.

    > What was the reason? What did Indonesians actually believe ethnic Chinese had done?

    There was a little thing called the Cultural Revolution going on in China in the 1960s, which promised to wipe out Malay/Indonesian culture and religion (this is the same reason why the ethnic Malays were so keen to back the British against the Communists in 1950s Malaya) entirely so that everybody could be subordinated to the Great Socialist Wave of the future. China was the main backer of the PKI.

    Again: that most Indonesian Chinese would have been considered “capitalist roaders” back home proved irrelevant. That’s not excusable. But the association of the PKI with Beijing also didn’t come out of nowhere.

    > In mu opinion, the issue in Singapore is Indians & Chinese.

    The issue is between Malays and Chinese, and always has been since the 1940s. Indians are the sideshow.

    Ironically, the main source of tension these days come from immigrants from the PRC, specifically imported to keep Singapore Han dominated. They aren’t used to living next to non-Han and their attitudes tend to rub the wrong way for Singaporeans of all races.

    •ï¿½Replies: @jeff stryker
    @nebulafox

    The last race riots in 2013 were in Little India.

    I don't think that the Malays in Singapore have their act together as a group to wage an effective resistence & don't outnumber Chinese but the Indians could be formidable adversaries.

    Anyhow, the Tamilian issues seem to be booze & this could be that lower-caste South Indians are basically Australian aboriginals. However, they are smarter cousins, maybe due to a genetic bottleneck at some point & could wage civil war in Singapore while the Malays are just too laidback.

    Replies: @boy1988, @littlereddot, @nebulafox
  • Further and better doctoral particulars about Malaysia’s untidy racial politics :

    https://theses.ncl.ac.uk/jspui/bitstream/10443/3540/1/Macleod%2C%20A.%202017.pdf

  • @nebulafox
    @jeff stryker

    The ethnic Chinese diaspora throughout Southeast Asia is a mix from all over Southeastern China, although you had different amounts of different groups depending on the country. One of the problems 1800s Malaysia had was the Chinese bringing over old beefs that the Taiping War had driven up to the elevens (the Hakka and Cantonese in particular didn't get along, for the simple reason that most of the Taiping leadership was Hakka and they were widely-not wrongly-seen as behind the mess), and communal divides between competing groups of Chinese lingered in the Singaporean consciousness right up until independence.

    Thanks to the sheer level of immigration, Singapore had the most diversity-and during the British era, different kampung areas would be inhabited by different kinds of Chinese.

    >I’ve also theorized that Islam suppresses the worse characteristics among Malays-alcoholism, promiscuity, prostitution, lying, stealing etc.-while Spanish brought it out in the Philippines.

    Yeah, I've occasionally theorized about that too, although it should be pointed out that this isn't exclusively negative: one of Islam's saving graces is a communitarian focus that mixes well with traditional Malay attitudes that, IMO, is one of the most admirable aspects of their culture.

    However... I think if you dive into the seamy side of Jakarta, you'll find that Islam hasn't erased things so much as pushed some of them underground. Also, the uber-religious crowd in Indonesia/Malaysia and the Southern Philippines can be scary.

    > but in countries like Indonesia or Philippines where the Southern Chinese can hide in subdivisions they are indifferent & work to create government indifference to maximize their profits.

    I can't speak for the Philippines, which I'm happy to defer to you on-it seems as though you've lived there for a long time and know more than I. But the government was certainly not "indifferent" to the ethnic Chinese in Indonesia. Turning them loose to make money was a calculated strategy that was created in Jakarta for the purpose of development (and enrichment) while Indonesia developed a native business and technical class.

    Suharto was not the kind of guy to leave anybody under illusions as to who called the shots (him-the curious mixture of Japanese trained ultra-nationalist military officer and old time Javanese sultan with fingers in every pocket), and he made sure everybody knew it. The point was particularly not lost on the ethnic Chinese, who were busy changing their names and forgetting their native language as per his edict.

    >The Tamil gangs of Malaysia are fearsome with machetes in a pack on the street but would not last 2 minutes against the Triads in the Philippines.

    Comparing the Philippines to Malaysia is like comparing Brazil to Italy or Argentina. The latter has its problems, but there's nothing on the scale of the former.

    Replies: @jeff stryker

    Argentina would fall between Brazil & Italy, not that it matters.

    Libraries have been written about Philippines but essentially the Spanish had a practice of marrying local chieftain’s daughters called “illustrados” to form alliances-while the British & Dutch outlawed this for fear these mixed-blood elite would revolt which is precisely what happened in Philippines & Latino America.

    Anyhow, as a result, Philippines resembles Latin America with an indifferent Mestizo elite owning most of the land & has a racial caste system run by descendants of Spanish.

    Some will argue that the Philippines did not get enough Chinese & were it 30 percent Chinese like Malaysia it would be Italy to Brazil but I tend to believe like the Taiwanese indigenous the Filipinos would just die out at that point.

    Oddly enough all the Chinese in Philippines do not just come from the Fujian Province but from Amoy in particular.

    One wonders, considering how assimilated the Chinese were in Indonesia, why the locals resented them that much.

    Possibly you or another poster can explain. What was the reason? What did Indonesians actually believe ethnic Chinese had done?

    In mu opinion, the issue in Singapore is Indians & Chinese. At some point, some event will create mass conflict between them & the Malays will do what they always do sitting back & drinking Tapico in a hammock.

    •ï¿½Replies: @nebulafox
    @jeff stryker

    I've heard mainland Chinese describe Filipinos to me as "our Mexicans".

    > What was the reason? What did Indonesians actually believe ethnic Chinese had done?

    There was a little thing called the Cultural Revolution going on in China in the 1960s, which promised to wipe out Malay/Indonesian culture and religion (this is the same reason why the ethnic Malays were so keen to back the British against the Communists in 1950s Malaya) entirely so that everybody could be subordinated to the Great Socialist Wave of the future. China was the main backer of the PKI.

    Again: that most Indonesian Chinese would have been considered "capitalist roaders" back home proved irrelevant. That's not excusable. But the association of the PKI with Beijing also didn't come out of nowhere.

    > In mu opinion, the issue in Singapore is Indians & Chinese.

    The issue is between Malays and Chinese, and always has been since the 1940s. Indians are the sideshow.

    Ironically, the main source of tension these days come from immigrants from the PRC, specifically imported to keep Singapore Han dominated. They aren't used to living next to non-Han and their attitudes tend to rub the wrong way for Singaporeans of all races.

    Replies: @jeff stryker
    , @Al Ross
    @jeff stryker

    "Oddly enough" ?

    Well if you believe that more Hokkien - speaking Chinese left Fujian's biggest town because they were near a port , you may also believe that most Irish Ellis Island arrivals departed from Cork for the same geographical reason.
    , @boy1988
    @jeff stryker

    Aren't Filipino Chinese more assimilated than Indonesian Chinese? It's practically impossible to find pinoy Chinese conversing in their dialects.the ones in Indonesia may look assimilated at first glance due to their Indonesian sounding names but if you go to Medan ,bangka island and west Kalimantan the Chinese culture is much more livelier compared to the ones in java.hokkien is spoken widely among Chinese in Medan while Hakka is the lingua franca among Chinese in bangka island and singkawang ( west Kalimantan).meanwhile Pontianak also in West Kalimantan is a teochew enclave.there are millions of Filipinos with only a quarter Han ancestry from their great grandparents carrying Chinese surnames and practice no Chinese culture whatsoever and look austro .Those Chinese mixed blood are similar to the ones called cina benteng of Batavia who live in poverty.doubt therell be a mass conflict between Indian and Chinese in singapore.they aren't negroid for God sakes.conflict with low iq Muslim austro is more likely in the future

    Replies: @Al Ross
  • Al Ross says:
    @jeff stryker
    @nebulafox

    1. The Chinese in SEA are Fukien or from Guangdong Province as oppose to Cantonese who are more laid-back, or Northern Chinese, who have a reputation as tough hard-drinkers.

    At any rate, the reason for their success was that they filled a niche & also that they intermarry creating family cartels.

    Are Chinese hardworking? Sure, but so are poor Filipinos.

    Are Fukien good employees? No, they tend to be sullen when subordinate & cold dictators as bosses.

    In SEA they are simply cold & ruthless. The only reason Malaysia & Singapore are more pleasant is because there are so many Chinese that they have to share the pie as it is majority-Chinese but in countries like Indonesia or Philippines where the Southern Chinese can hide in subdivisions they are indifferent & work to create government indifference to maximize their profits.

    Mostly though, they have no ethics, though they will be scrupulous in dealings with other ethnic Chinese: the drug war in the Philippines is a vertically-integrated result of Chinese cartels.

    NB Some ethnic Chinese formed Communist movements which gave other Chinese an excuse to bribe the government into banning unions or guilds so the Malays work for peanuts & cannot protest.

    2) True, we see some Chinpouts here though why they come to a white views blog commentary & expect anything else, who knows? It is like going to an X rated movie & complaining you saw a penis. I know who the ethnic Southern Chinese here are due to their outbursts. Overall, and I have been a businessman in SEA from time to time, they are insubordinate & sullen employees. Effective bosses, though tyrannical.

    However, the sudden alcohol-influenced crimes of "amok" are Malay. Malays have a bad reaction to alcohol & their behavior under-the-influence can be uncontrollable. The ethnic Chinese who is angry will usually steal something from his employee at the end of his contract rather than getting drunk & being violent.

    3) Ethnic Chinese are more likely to be gambling addicts. Partly out of religion & a belief in moral character. Malays are more prone to addiction. That is why the Chinese created a drug war in the Philippines. Ethnic Chinese like heroin just as ghetto blacks prefer crack over meth but for Malays sadly Meth is their drug of choice. Meth is highly addictive & Malays are prone to addictive behavior anyhow such as alcoholism which means that once on Ice or Yabba aka Meth aka Shabu all of the internet bad qualities of the Malay character emerge: sexual deviance & mania; kleptomania, dishonesty; sadism & plain craziness emerge. The Meth brings it out, which is why the Philippine government tried to stamp out meth use. Chinese are inclined to Opiates & Chinese addicts are either asleep or sick while the Malay Methamphetamine addict can become a supercharged crime machine.

    I've also theorized that Islam suppresses the worse characteristics among Malays-alcoholism, promiscuity, prostitution, lying, stealing etc.-while Spanish brought it out in the Philippines.

    NB Philippine is worse because of the Spanish-Mexican genes.

    4) The Tamil gangs of Malaysia are fearsome with machetes in a pack on the street but would not last 2 minutes against the Triads in the Philippines. It is like comparing Bloods to the Italian mafia. The latter are smarter & better able to bribe corrupt authorities. Occasionally, Indians have tried to enter the Philippines meth game & get busted fast. However, there is Chinese Triad activity in Malaysia especially car thieves who steal cars & ship them to the Philippines. This is a huge business. The Tamil gangs of the streets of Kuala Lumpur would not last a minute in the Philippines & in Singapore which was always a tough-on-crime soft dictatorship they would be locked up. Also, Malaysia takes a tough stance on drugs so Chinese or Malays or whites or whoever do not want to fight with machetes over gutter crumbs in Kuala Lumpur back alleys. Also, with no Bumi laws than riots like 1969 would happen or the 1998 riots.

    Replies: @littlereddot, @boy1988, @nebulafox, @Al Ross

    Try speaking Hokkien in KL . No go.

    Try Cantonese in KL , works every time.

    LKY was a Hakka.

    The Cambodian Govt. Number 1 and former number 2 ( Hun Sen and Sok An ) are both Teochew.

    Your opinions on the Overseas Chinese are simplistic and calculated to impress readers who know little about that fascinating group.

    Politically , the Chinese in Penang viewed 1957’s Independence with trepidation but were smart enough to not oppose it.