');
The Unz Review •ï¿½An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library •ï¿½B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


�Remember My InformationWhy?
�Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Alastair Crooke Ambrose Kane Anatoly Karlin Andrew Anglin Andrew Joyce Audacious Epigone Boyd D. Cathey C.J. Hopkins E. Michael Jones Eric Margolis Eric Striker Fred Reed Gilad Atzmon Godfree Roberts Gregory Hood Guillaume Durocher Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir James Kirkpatrick James Thompson Jared Taylor John Derbyshire Jonathan Cook Jung-Freud Karlin Community Kevin Barrett Kevin MacDonald Lance Welton Larry Romanoff Laurent Guyénot Linh Dinh Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Kersey Pepe Escobar Peter Frost Philip Giraldi Razib Khan Ron Unz Steve Sailer The Saker Tobias Langdon A. Graham A. J. Smuskiewicz A Southerner Academic Research Group UK Staff Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Agha Hussain Ahmad Al Khaled Ahmet Öncü Alain De Benoist Alan Macleod Albemarle Man Alex Graham Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alexander Jacob Alexander Wolfheze Alfred McCoy Alison Weir Allan Wall Allegra Harpootlian Amalric De Droevig Amr Abozeid Anand Gopal Anastasia Katz Andre Damon Andre Vltchek Andreas Canetti Andrei Martyanov Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andrew Hamilton Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Napolitano Andrew S. Fischer Andy Kroll Angie Saxon Ann Jones Anna Tolstoyevskaya Anne Wilson Smith Anonymous Anonymous American Anonymous Attorney Anonymous Occidental Anthony Boehm Anthony Bryan Anthony DiMaggio Tony Hall Antiwar Staff Antonius Aquinas Antony C. Black Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor AudaciousEpigone Augustin Goland Austen Layard Ava Muhammad Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Kissin Barry Lando Barton Cockey Beau Albrecht Belle Chesler Ben Fountain Ben Freeman Ben Sullivan Benjamin Villaroel Bernard M. Smith Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Blake Archer Williams Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Book Brad Griffin Bradley Moore Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brett Wilkins Brian Dew Brian McGlinchey Brian R. Wright Brittany Smith C.D. Corax Cara Marianna Carl Boggs Carl Horowitz Carolyn Yeager Cat McGuire Catherine Crump César Keller Chalmers Johnson Chanda Chisala Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlie O'Neill Charlottesville Survivor Chase Madar Chauke Stephan Filho Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Chris Woltermann Christian Appy Christophe Dolbeau Christopher DeGroot Christopher Donovan Christopher Ketcham Chuck Spinney Civus Non Nequissimus CODOH Editors Coleen Rowley Colin Liddell Cooper Sterling Craig Murray Cynthia Chung D.F. Mulder Dahr Jamail Dakota Witness Dan E. Phillips Dan Sanchez Daniel Barge Daniel McAdams Daniel Moscardi Daniel Vinyard Danny Sjursen Dave Chambers Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Boyajian David Bromwich David Chibo David Chu David Gordon David Haggith David Irving David L. McNaron David Lorimer David Martin David North David Stockman David Vine David Walsh David William Pear David Yorkshire Dean Baker Declan Hayes Dennis Dale Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Diego Ramos Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Dmitriy Kalyagin Donald Thoresen Alan Sabrosky Dr. Ejaz Akram Dr. Ridgely Abdul Mu’min Muhammad Dries Van Langenhove E. Frederick Stevens Eamonn Fingleton Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Edward Curtin Edward Dutton Egbert Dijkstra Egor Kholmogorov Ehud Shapiro Ekaterina Blinova Ellen Brown Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Emil Kirkegaard Emilio García Gómez Emma Goldman Enzo Porter Eric Draitser Eric Paulson Eric Peters Eric Rasmusen Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Gant Eugene Girin Eugene Kusmiak Eve Mykytyn F. Roger Devlin Fadi Abu Shammalah Fantine Gardinier Federale Fenster Fergus Hodgson Finian Cunningham The First Millennium Revisionist Fordham T. Smith Former Agent Forum Francis Goumain Frank Tipler Franklin Lamb Franklin Stahl Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Gary Corseri Gary Heavin Gary North Gary Younge Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Galloway George Koo George Mackenzie George Szamuely Georgianne Nienaber Gilbert Cavanaugh Gilbert Doctorow Giles Corey Glen K. Allen Glenn Greenwald A. Beaujean Agnostic Alex B. Amnestic Arcane Asher Bb Bbartlog Ben G Birch Barlow Canton ChairmanK Chrisg Coffee Mug Darth Quixote David David B David Boxenhorn DavidB Diana Dkane DMI Dobeln Duende Dylan Ericlien Fly Gcochran Godless Grady Herrick Jake & Kara Jason Collins Jason Malloy Jason�s Jeet Jemima Joel John Emerson John Quiggin JP Kele Kjmtchl Mark Martin Matoko Kusanagi Matt Matt McIntosh Michael Vassar Miko Ml Ole P-ter Piccolino Rosko Schizmatic Scorpius Suman TangoMan The Theresa Thorfinn Thrasymachus Wintz Gonzalo Lira Graham Seibert Grant M. Dahl Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Greg Klein Gregg Stanley Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Conte Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Gunnar Alfredsson Gustavo Arellano Hank Johnson Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Hans Vogel Harri Honkanen Heiner Rindermann Henry Cockburn Hewitt E. Moore Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Howe Abbot-Hiss Hua Bin Hubert Collins Hugh Kennedy Hugh McInnish Hugh Moriarty Hugo Dionísio Hunter DeRensis Hunter Wallace Huntley Haverstock Ian Fantom Ian Proud Igor Shafarevich Ira Chernus Ivan Kesić J. Alfred Powell J.B. Clark J.D. Gore J. Ricardo Martins Jacek Szela Jack Antonio Jack Dalton Jack Kerwick Jack Krak Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen Jake Bowyer James Bovard James Carroll James Carson Harrington James Chang James Dunphy James Durso James Edwards James Fulford James Gillespie James Hanna James J. O'Meara James K. Galbraith James Karlsson James Lawrence James Petras Jane Lazarre Jane Weir Janice Kortkamp Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Cannon Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jayant Bhandari JayMan Jean Bricmont Jean Marois Jean Ranc Jef Costello Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey D. Sachs Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jesse Mossman JHR Writers Jim Daniel Jim Fetzer Jim Goad Jim Kavanagh Jim Smith JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Dackman Joe Lauria Joel S. Hirschhorn Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Gorman John Harrison Sims John Helmer John Hill John Huss John J. Mearsheimer John Jackson John Kiriakou John Macdonald John Morgan John Patterson John Leonard John Pilger John Q. Publius John Rand John Reid John Ryan John Scales Avery John Siman John Stauber John T. Kelly John Taylor John Titus John Tremain John V. Walsh John Wear John Williams Jon Else Jon Entine Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Revusky Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Sawyer Jonathan Schell Jordan Henderson Jordan Steiner Jose Alberto Nino Joseph Kay Joseph Kishore Joseph Sobran Josephus Tiberius Josh Neal Jeshurun Tsarfat Juan Cole Judith Coburn Julian Bradford Julian Macfarlane K.J. Noh Kacey Gunther Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Karl Haemers Karl Nemmersdorf Karl Thorburn Kees Van Der Pijl Keith Woods Kelley Vlahos Kenn Gividen Kenneth Vinther Kerry Bolton Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin Folta Kevin Michael Grace Kevin Rothrock Kevin Sullivan Kevin Zeese Kit Klarenberg Kshama Sawant Larry C. Johnson Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Lawrence Erickson Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Leonard C. Goodman Leonard R. Jaffee Liam Cosgrove Lidia Misnik Lilith Powell Linda Preston Lipton Matthews Liv Heide Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett Louis Farrakhan Lydia Brimelow M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maciej Pieczyński Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marco De Wit Marcus Alethia Marcus Apostate Marcus Cicero Marcus Devonshire Margaret Flowers Margot Metroland Marian Evans Mark Allen Mark Bratchikov-Pogrebisskiy Mark Crispin Miller Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Gullick Mark H. Gaffney Mark Lu Mark Perry Mark Weber Marshall Yeats Martin Jay Martin K. O'Toole Martin Lichtmesz Martin Webster Martin Witkerk Mary Phagan-Kean Matt Cockerill Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Caldwell Matthew Ehret Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max Jones Max North Max Parry Max West Maya Schenwar Merlin Miller Metallicman Michael A. Roberts Michael Averko Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Hoffman Michael Masterson Michael Quinn Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Michelle Malkin Miko Peled Mnar Muhawesh Moon Landing Skeptic Morgan Jones Morris V. De Camp Mr. Anti-Humbug Muhammed Abu Murray Polner N. Joseph Potts Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Nathan Cofnas Nathan Doyle Ned Stark Neil Kumar Nelson Rosit Niall McCrae Nicholas R. Jeelvy Nicholas Stix Nick Griffin Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Nicolás Palacios Navarro Nils Van Der Vegte Noam Chomsky NOI Research Group Nomi Prins Norman Finkelstein Norman Solomon OldMicrobiologist Oliver Boyd-Barrett Oliver Williams Oscar Grau P.J. Collins Pádraic O'Bannon Patrice Greanville Patrick Armstrong Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Patrick Lawrence Patrick Martin Patrick McDermott Patrick Whittle Paul Bennett Paul Cochrane Paul De Rooij Paul Edwards Paul Engler Paul Gottfried Paul Larudee Paul Mitchell Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Paul Souvestre Paul Tripp Pedro De Alvarado Peter Baggins Ph.D. Peter Bradley Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Lee Peter Van Buren Philip Kraske Philip Weiss Pierre M. Sprey Pierre Simon Povl H. Riis-Knudsen Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Qasem Soleimani Rachel Marsden Raches Radhika Desai Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ralph Raico Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Ramzy Baroud Randy Shields Raul Diego Ray McGovern Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Reginald De Chantillon Rémi Tremblay Rev. Matthew Littlefield Ricardo Duchesne Richard Cook Richard Falk Richard Foley Richard Galustian Richard Houck Richard Hugus Richard Knight Richard Krushnic Richard McCulloch Richard Parker Richard Silverstein Richard Solomon Rick Shenkman Rick Sterling Rita Rozhkova Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Debrus Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Fisk Robert Hampton Robert Henderson Robert Inlakesh Robert LaFlamme Robert Lindsay Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Stark Robert Stevens Robert Trivers Robert Wallace Robert Weissberg Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Rolo Slavskiy Romana Rubeo Romanized Visigoth Ron Paul Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning RT Staff Ruuben Kaalep Ryan Andrews Ryan Dawson Sabri Öncü Salim Mansur Sam Dickson Sam Francis Sam Husseini Samuel Sequeira Sayed Hasan Scot Olmstead Scott Howard Scott Locklin Scott Ritter Servando Gonzalez Sharmine Narwani Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Sidney James Sietze Bosman Sigurd Kristensen Sinclair Jenkins Southfront Editor Spencer Davenport Spencer J. Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen F. Cohen Stephen J. Rossi Stephen J. Sniegoski Stephen Paul Foster Sterling Anderson Steve Fraser Steve Keen Steve Penfield Steven Farron Steven Yates Subhankar Banerjee Susan Southard Sydney Schanberg Talia Mullin Tanya Golash-Boza Taxi Taylor McClain Taylor Young Ted O'Keefe Ted Rall The Crew The Zman Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas A. Fudge Thomas Anderson Thomas Hales Thomas Dalton Thomas Ertl Thomas Frank Thomas Hales Thomas Jackson Thomas O. Meehan Thomas Steuben Thomas Zaja Thorsten J. Pattberg Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Timothy Vorgenss Timur Fomenko Tingba Muhammad Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Engelhardt Tom Mysiewicz Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Torin Murphy Tracy Rosenberg Travis LeBlanc Trevor Lynch Vernon Thorpe Virginia Dare Vito Klein Vladimir Brovkin Vladimir Putin Vladislav Krasnov Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walt King Walter E. Block Warren Balogh Washington Watcher Washington Watcher II Wayne Allensworth Wei Ling Chua Wesley Muhammad White Man Faculty Whitney Webb Wilhelm Kriessmann Wilhem Ivorsson Will Jones Will Offensicht William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Wyatt Peterson Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen Yaroslav Podvolotskiy Yvonne Lorenzo Zhores Medvedev
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2020 Election Academia American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Benjamin Netanyahu Black Crime Black Lives Matter Blacks Britain Censorship China China/America Conspiracy Theories Covid Culture/Society Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy Gaza Genocide Hamas History Holocaust Ideology Immigration IQ Iran Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Joe Biden NATO Nazi Germany Neocons Open Thread Political Correctness Race/Ethnicity Russia Science Ukraine Vladimir Putin World War II 汪精衛 100% Jussie-free Content 1984 2008 Election 2012 Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2022 Election 2024 Election 23andMe 9/11 Abortion Abraham Lincoln Abu Mehdi Muhandas Achievement Gap ACLU Acting White Adam Schiff Addiction ADL Admin Administration Admixture Adolf Hitler Advertising AfD Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Afrocentricism Age Age Of Malthusian Industrialism Agriculture AI AIPAC Air Force Aircraft Carriers Airlines Airports Al Jazeera Al Qaeda Al-Shifa Alain Soral Alan Clemmons Alan Dershowitz Albania Albert Einstein Albion's Seed Alcoholism Alejandro Mayorkas Alex Jones Alexander Dugin Alexander Vindman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Alexei Navalny Algeria Ali Dawabsheh Alien And Sedition Acts Alison Nathan Alt Right Altruism Amazon Amazon.com America America First American Civil War American Dream American History American Indians American Israel Public Affairs Committee American Jews American Left American Nations American Presidents American Prisons American Renaissance Amerindians Amish Amnesty Amnesty International Amos Hochstein Amy Klobuchar Amygdala Anarchism Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Greece Ancient Rome Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Bacevich Andrew Sullivan Andrew Yang Anglo-America Anglo-imperialism Anglo-Saxons Anglos Anglosphere Angola Animal IQ Animal Rights Wackos Animals Ann Coulter Anne Frank Anthony Blinken Anthony Fauci Anthrax Anthropology Anti-Defamation League Anti-Gentilism Anti-Semites Anti-Vaccination Anti-Vaxx Anti-white Animus Antifa Antifeminism Antiracism Antisemitism Antisemitism Awareness Act Antisocial Behavior Antizionism Antony Blinken Apartheid Apartheid Israel Apollo's Ascent Appalachia Apple Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaeogenetics Archaeology Archaic DNA Architecture Arctic Arctic Sea Ice Melting Argentina Ariel Sharon Armageddon War Armenia Armenian Genocide Army Arnold Schwarzenegger Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Jensen Arthur Lichte Artificial Intelligence Arts/Letters Aryan Invasion Theory Aryans Aryeh Lightstone Ash Carter Ashkenazi Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians Assassination Assassinations Assimilation Atheism Atlanta AUMF Auschwitz Australia Australian Aboriginals Autism Automation Avril Haines Ayn Rand Azerbaijan Azov Brigade Babes And Hunks Baby Gap Balfour Declaration Balkans Balochistan Baltics Baltimore Riots Banjamin Netanyahu Banking Industry Banking System Banks #BanTheADL Barack Obama Baseball Statistics Bashar Al-Assad Basketball #BasketOfDeplorables BBC BDS BDS Movement Beauty Beethoven Behavior Genetics Behavioral Genetics Bela Belarus Belgium Belgrade Embassy Bombing Ben Cardin Ben Rhodes Ben Shapiro Ben Stiller Benny Gantz Bernard Henri-Levy Bernie Sanders Betsy DeVos Betty McCollum Bezalel Smotrich Bezalel Yoel Smotrich Biden BigPost Bilateral Relations Bilingual Education Bill Clinton Bill De Blasio Bill Gates Bill Kristol Bill Maher Bill Of Rights Billionaires Billy Graham Bioethics Biology Bioweapons Birmingham Birth Rate Bitcoin Black Community Black History Month Black Muslims Black Panthers Black People Black Slavery BlackLivesMatter BlackRock Blake Masters Blank Slatism BLM Blog Blogging Blogosphere Blond Hair Blood Libel Blue Eyes Boasian Anthropology Boeing Boers Bolshevik Revolution Bolshevik Russia Books Boomers Border Wall Boris Johnson Bosnia Boycott Divest And Sanction Brain Drain Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Bret Stephens Brett McGurk Bretton Woods Brexit Brezhnev Bri Brian Mast BRICs Brighter Brains British Empire British Labour Party British Politics Buddhism Build The Wall Bulldog Bush Business Byzantine Caitlin Johnstone California Californication Camp Of The Saints Canada Cancer Candace Owens Capitalism Carlos Slim Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Cars Carthaginians Catalonia Catholic Church Catholicism Catholics Cats Caucasus CCP CDC Ceasefire Cecil Rhodes Census Central Asia Central Intelligence Agency Chanda Chisala Chaos And Order Charles De Gaulle Charles Lindbergh Charles Manson Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charlie Hebdo Charlottesville ChatGPT Checheniest Chechen Of Them All Chechens Chechnya Chernobyl Chetty Chicago Chicagoization Chicken Hut Child Abuse Children Chile China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese IQ Chinese Language Christian Zionists Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Christopher Wray Chuck Schumer CIA Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil Rights Movement Civil War Civilization Clannishness Clash Of Civilizations Class Classical Antiquity Classical History Classical Music Clayton County Climate Climate Change Clint Eastwood Clintons Coal Coalition Of The Fringes Coen Brothers Cognitive Elitism Cognitive Science Cold Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Powell Colin Woodard College Admission College Football Colonialism Color Revolution Columbia University Columbus Comic Books Communism Computers Confederacy Confederate Flag Congress Conquistador-American Conservatism Conservative Movement Conservatives Conspiracy Theory Constantinople Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumerism Controversial Book Convergence Core Article Corona Corporatism Corruption COTW Counterpunch Country Music Cousin Marriage Cover Story COVID-19 Craig Murray Creationism Crime Crimea Crispr Critical Race Theory Cruise Missiles Crusades Crying Among The Farmland Cryptocurrency Ctrl-Left Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckery Cuckservatism Cuckservative CUFI Cuisine Cultural Marxism Culture Culture War Curfew Czars Czech Republic DACA Daily Data Dump Dallas Shooting Damnatio Memoriae Dan Bilzarian Danny Danon Daren Acemoglu Darwinism Darya Dugina Data Data Analysis Dave Chappelle David Bazelon David Brog David Friedman David Frum David Irving David Lynch David Petraeus Davide Piffer Davos Death Of The West Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Deborah Lipstadt Debt Debt Jubilee Decadence Deep State DeepSeek Deficits Degeneracy Democracy Democratic Party Demograhics Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denmark Dennis Ross Department Of Education Department Of Homeland Security Deplatforming Derek Chauvin Detroit Development Dick Cheney Diet Digital Yuan Dinesh D'Souza Discrimination Disease Disinformation Disney Disparate Impact Disraeli Dissent Dissidence Diversity Diversity Before Diversity Diversity Pokemon Points Divorce DNA Dogs Dollar Domestic Surveillance Domestic Terrorism Doomsday Clock Dostoevsky Doug Emhoff Doug Feith Dresden Drone War Drones Drug Laws Drugs Duterte Dysgenic Dystopia E. Michael Jones E. O. Wilson East Asia East Asian Exception East Asians East Turkestan Eastern Europe Ebrahim Raisi Economic Development Economic History Economic Sanctions Economy Ecuador Edmund Burke Edmund Burke Foundation Education Edward Snowden Effective Altruism Effortpost Efraim Zurofff Egor Kholmogorov Egypt El Salvador Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2020 Election Fraud Elections Electric Cars Eli Rosenbaum Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elise Stefanik Elites Elizabeth Holmes Elizabeth Warren Elliot Abrams Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emmanuel Macron Emmett Till Employment Energy England Entertainment Environment Environmentalism Epidemiology Equality Erdogan Eretz Israel Eric Zemmour Ernest Hemingway Espionage Espionage Act Estonia Ethics Ethics And Morals Ethiopia Ethnic Cleansing Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity Ethnocentricty EU Eugene Debs Eugenics Eurabia Eurasia Euro Europe European Genetics European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Genetics Evolutionary Psychology Existential Risks Eye Color Face Shape Facebook Faces Fake News False Flag Attack Family Fantasy FARA Farmers Fascism Fast Food FBI FDA FDD Federal Reserve Feminism Ferguson Ferguson Shooting Fermi Paradox Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Finland Finn Baiting First Amendment FISA Fitness Flash Mobs Flight From White Floyd Riots 2020 Fluctuarius Argenteus Flynn Effect Food Football For Fun Forecasts Foreign Agents Registration Act Foreign Aid Foreign Policy Fourth Amendment Fox News France Francesca Albanese Frank Salter Frankfurt School Franklin D. Roosevelt Franz Boas Fraud Freakonomics Fred Kagan Free Market Free Speech Free Trade Freedom Of Speech Freedom French Revolution Friedrich Karl Berger Friends Of The Israel Defense Forces Frivolty Frontlash Furkan Dogan Future Futurism G20 Gambling Game Game Of Thrones Gavin McInnes Gavin Newsom Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians GDP Gen Z Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Equality Gender Reassignment Gene-Culture Coevolution Genealogy General Intelligence General Motors Generation Z Generational Gap Genes Genetic Diversity Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Genghis Khan Genocide Convention Genomics Gentrification Geography Geopolitics George Floyd George Galloway George Patton George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush Georgia Germans Germany Ghislaine Maxwell Gilad Atzmon Gina Peddy Giorgia Meloni Gladwell Glenn Greenwald Global Warming Globalism Globalization Globo-Homo God Gold Golf Gonzalo Lira Google Government Government Debt Government Overreach Government Spending Government Surveillance Government Waste Goyim Grant Smith Graphs Great Bifurcation Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Powers Great Replacement #GreatWhiteDefendantPrivilege Greece Greeks Greenland Greg Cochran Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Greta Thunberg Grooming Group Selection GSS Guardian Guest Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns GWAS Gypsies H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Haiti Hajnal Line Halloween HammerHate Hannibal Procedure Happening Happiness Harvard Harvard University Harvey Weinstein Hassan Nasrallah Hate Crimes Fraud Hoax Hate Hoaxes Hate Speech Hbd Hbd Chick Health Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Hegira Height Henry Harpending Henry Kissinger Heredity Heritability Hezbollah High Speed Rail Hillary Clinton Hindu Caste System Hindus Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanics Historical Genetics History Of Science Hitler HIV/AIDS Hoax Holland Hollywood Holocaust Denial Holocaust Deniers Holy Roman Empire Homelessness Homicide Homicide Rate Hominin Homomania Homosexuality Hong Kong Houellebecq Housing Houthis Howard Kohr Huawei Hubbert's Peak Huddled Masses Huey Newton Hug Thug Human Achievement Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Evolutionary Genetics Human Evolutionary Genomics Human Genetics Human Genomics Human Rights Human Rights Watch Humor Hungary Hunt For The Great White Defendant Hunter Biden Hunter-Gatherers I.F. Stone I.Q. I.Q. Genomics #IBelieveInHavenMonahan ICC Icj Ideas Identity Ideology And Worldview IDF Idiocracy Igbo Ilan Pappe Ilhan Omar Illegal Immigration Ilyushin IMF Impeachment Imperialism Imran Awan Inbreeding Income India Indian Indian IQ Indians Individualism Indo-Europeans Indonesia Inequality Inflation Intelligence Intelligence Agencies Intelligent Design International International Affairs International Comparisons International Court Of Justice International Criminal Court International Relations Internet Interracial Marriage Interracism Intersectionality Intifada Intra-Racism Intraracism Invade Invite In Hock Invade The World Invite The World Iosef Stalin Iosif Stalin Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iranian Nuclear Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Irish Is Love Colorblind Isaac Herzog ISIS Islam Islamic Jihad Islamic State Islamism Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Bonds Israel Defense Force Israel Defense Forces Israel Separation Wall Israeli Occupation IT Italy Itamar Ben-Gvir It's Okay To Be White Ivanka Ivy League J Street Jacky Rosen Jair Bolsonaro Jake Sullivan Jake Tapper Jamal Khashoggi James Angleton James Clapper James Comey James Forrestal James Jeffrey James Mattis James Watson James Zogby Janet Yellen Janice Yellen Japan Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Greenblatt JASTA JCPOA JD Vance Jeb Bush Jeffrey Epstein Jeffrey Goldberg Jeffrey Sachs Jen Psaki Jennifer Rubin Jens Stoltenberg Jeremy Corbyn Jerry Seinfeld Jerusalem Jerusalem Post Jesuits Jesus Jesus Christ Jewish Genetics Jewish History Jewish Intellectuals Jewish Power Jewish Power Party Jewish Supremacism JFK Assassination JFK Jr. Jihadis Jill Stein Jimmy Carter Jingoism JINSA Joe Lieberman Joe Rogan John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John F. Kennedy John Hagee John Kirby John Kiriakou John McCain John McLaughlin John Mearsheimer Joker Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Greenblatt Jonathan Pollard Jordan Peterson Joseph McCarthy Josh Gottheimer Josh Paul Journalism Judaism Judea Judge George Daniels Judicial System Julian Assange Jussie Smollett Justice Justin Trudeau Kaboom Kahanists Kaiser Wilhelm Kamala Harris Kamala On Her Knees Kanye West Karabakh War 2020 Karen Kwiatkowski Karine Jean-Pierre Kash Patel Kashmir Kata'ib Hezbollah Kay Bailey Hutchison Kazakhstan Keir Starmer Kenneth Marcus Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Williamson Khazars Kids Kim Jong Un Kinship Kkk KKKrazy Glue Of The Coalition Of The Fringes Knesset Kompromat Korea Korean War Kosovo Kris Kobach Kristi Noem Ku Klux Klan Kubrick Kurds Kushner Foundation Kyle Rittenhouse Kyrie Irving Language Laos Larry C. Johnson Late Obama Age Collapse Latin America Latinos Laura Loomer Law Lawfare LDNR Lead Poisoning Leahy Amendments Leahy Law Lebanon Lee Kuan Yew Leftism Lenin Leo Frank Leo Strauss Let's Talk About My Hair LGBT LGBTI Liberal Opposition Liberal Whites Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libya Lindsey Graham Linguistics Literacy Literature Lithuania Litvinenko Living Standards Liz Cheney Liz Truss Lloyd Austin Localism long-range-missile-defense Longevity Looting Lord Of The Rings Lorde Los Angeles Loudoun County Louis Farrakhan Love And Marriage Low-fat Lukashenko Lula Lyndon B Johnson Lyndon Johnson Madeleine Albright Mafia MAGA Magnitsky Act Malaysia Malaysian Airlines MH17 Manosphere Manufacturing Mao Zedong Map Marco Rubio Maria Butina Marijuana Marine Le Pen Marjorie Taylor Greene Mark Milley Mark Steyn Mark Warner Marriage Martin Luther King Martin Scorsese Marvel Marx Marxism Masculinity Mass Shootings Mate Choice Mathematics Matt Gaetz Max Boot Max Weber Maxine Waters Mayans McCain McCain/POW McDonald's Meat Media Media Bias Medicine Medieval Christianity Medieval Russia Mediterranean Diet Medvedev Megan McCain Meghan Markle Mein Obama MEK Mel Gibson Men With Gold Chains Meng Wanzhou Mental Health Mental Illness Mental Traits Meritocracy Merkel Merkel Youth Merkel's Boner Merrick Garland Mexico MH 17 MI-6 Michael Bloomberg Michael Collins PIper Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Michael Jackson Michael Lind Michael McFaul Michael Moore Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michelle Goldberg Michelle Ma Belle Michelle Obama Microaggressions Middle Ages Middle East Migration Mike Huckabee Mike Johnson Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mike Waltz Mikhael Gorbachev Miles Mathis Militarized Police Military Military Analysis Military Budget Military History Military Spending Military Technology Millennials Milner Group Minimum Wage Minneapolis Minorities Miriam Adelson Miscegenation Miscellaneous Misdreavus Mishima Missile Defense Mitch McConnell Mitt Romney Mixed-Race MK-Ultra Mohammed Bin Salman Monarchy Mondoweiss Money Mongolia Mongols Monkeypox Monogamy Moon Landing Hoax Moon Landings Moore's Law Morality Mormonism Mormons Mortality Mortgage Moscow Mossad Movies Muhammad Multiculturalism Music Muslim Ban Muslims Mussolini NAEP Naftali Bennett Nakba NAMs Nancy Pelos Nancy Pelosi Narendra Modi NASA Nation Of Hate Nation Of Islam National Assessment Of Educational Progress National Debt National Endowment For Democracy National Review National Security Strategy National Socialism National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans Natural Gas Nature Vs. Nurture Navalny Affair Navy Standards Nazis Nazism Neandertals Neanderthals Near Abroad Negrolatry Nehru Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolibs Neolithic Neoreaction Netherlands Never Again Education Act New Cold War New Dark Age New Horizon Foundation New Orleans New Silk Road New Tes New World Order New York New York City New York Times New Zealand New Zealand Shooting NFL Nicholas II Nicholas Wade Nick Eberstadt Nick Fuentes Nicolas Maduro Niger Nigeria Nike Nikki Haley NIMBY Nina Jankowicz No Fly Zone Noam Chomsky Nobel Prize Nord Stream Nord Stream Pipelines Nordics Norman Braman Norman Finkelstein North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway Novorossiya NSA NSO Group Nuclear Power Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Nuremberg Nutrition NYPD Obama Obama Presidency Obamacare Obesity Obituary Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Wall Street October Surprise Oedipus Complex OFAC Oil Oil Industry Olav Scholz Old Testament Oliver Stone Olympics Open Borders OpenThread Opinion Poll Opioids Orban Organized Crime Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Orwell Osama Bin Laden OTFI Ottoman Empire Our Soldiers Speak Out Of Africa Model Paganism Pakistan Pakistani Paleoanthropology Palestine Palestinians Palin Pam Bondi Panhandling Papacy Paper Review Parasite Burden Parenting Parenting Paris Attacks Partly Inbred Extended Family Pat Buchanan Pathogens Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Findley Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Durov Pavel Grudinin Paypal Peak Oil Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Pentagon Personal Genomics Personality Pete Buttgieg Pete Hegseth Peter Frost Peter Thiel Peter Turchin Petro Poroshenko Pew Phil Rushton Philadelphia Philippines Philosophy Phoenicians Phyllis Randall Physiognomy Piers Morgan Pigmentation Pigs Piracy PISA Pizzagate POC Ascendancy Podcast Poland Police Police State Polio Political Correctness Makes You Stupid Political Dissolution Political Economy Politicians Politics Polling Pollution Polygamy Polygyny Pope Francis Population Population Genetics Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Porn Pornography Portland Portugal Portuguese Post-Apocalypse Poverty Power Pramila Jayapal PRC Prediction Prescription Drugs President Joe Biden Presidential Race '08 Presidential Race '12 Presidential Race '16 Presidential Race '20 Prince Andrew Prince Harry Princeton University Priti Patel Privacy Privatization Progressives Propaganda Prostitution protest Protestantism Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion Proud Boys Psychology Psychometrics Psychopathy Public Health Public Schools Puerto Rico Puritans Putin Putin Derangement Syndrome QAnon Qassem Soleimani Qatar Quantitative Genetics Quebec Quiet Skies Quincy Institute R2P Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race/IQ Race Riots Rachel Corrie Racial Purism Racial Reality Racialism Racism Rafah Raj Shah Rand Paul Randy Fine Rap Music Rape Rashida Tlaib Rationality Ray McGovern Raymond Chandler Razib Khan Real Estate RealWorld Recep Tayyip Erdogan Red Sea Refugee Crisis #refugeeswelcome Religion Religion And Philosophy Rentier Reparations Reprint Republican Party Republicans Review Revisionism Rex Tillerson RFK Assassination Ricci Richard Dawkins Richard Goldberg Richard Grenell Richard Haas Richard Haass Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Rightwing Cinema Riots R/k Theory RMAX Robert A. Heinlein Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Ford Robert Kagan Robert Kraft Robert Maxwell Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert O'Brien Robert Reich Robots Rock Music Roe Vs. Wade Roger Waters Rolling Stone Roman Empire Romania Romanticism Rome Ron DeSantis Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rotherham Rothschilds RT International Rudy Giuliani Rush Limbaugh Russiagate Russian Demography Russian Elections 2018 Russian History Russian Media Russian Military Russian Nationalism Russian Occupation Government Russian Orthodox Church Russian Reaction Russians Russophobes Russophobia Russotriumph Ruth Bader Ginsburg Rwanda Sabrina Rubin Erdely Sacha Baron Cohen Sacklers Sailer Strategy Sailer's First Law Of Female Journalism Saint Peter Tear Down This Gate! Saint-Petersburg Salman Rushie Salt Sam Altman Sam Bankman-Fried Sam Francis Samantha Power Samson Option San Bernadino Massacre Sandra Beleza Sandy Hook Sapir-Whorf SAT Satanic Age Satanism Saudi Arabia Scandal Science Denialism Science Fiction Scooter Libby Scotland Scott Ritter Scrabble Sean Hannity Seattle Secession Self Determination Self Indulgence Semites Serbia Sergei Lavrov Sergei Skripal Sergey Glazyev Seth Rich Sex Sex Differences Sexism Sexual Harassment Sexual Selection Sexuality Seymour Hersh Shai Masot Shakespeare Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shireen Abu Akleh Shmuley Boteach Shoah Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shulamit Aloni Shurat HaDin Sigal Mandelker Sigar Pearl Mandelker Sigmund Freud Silicon Valley Singapore Single Men Single Women Sinotriumph Six Day War Sixties SJWs Skin Color Slavery Slavery Reparations Slavoj Zizek Slavs Smart Fraction Social Justice Warriors Social Media Social Science Socialism Society Sociobiology Sociology Sodium Solzhenitsyn Somalia Sotomayor South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea Southeast Asia Soviet History Soviet Union Sovok Space Space Exploration Space Program Spain Spanish Spanish River High School SPLC Sport Sports Srebrenica St Petersburg International Economic Forum Stabby Somali Staffan Stage Stalinism Standardized Tests Star Trek Star Wars Starbucks Starvation Comparisons State Department Statistics Statue Of Liberty Steny Hoyer Stephen Cohen Stephen Harper Stephen Jay Gould Stereotypes Steroids Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steve Witkoff Steven Pinker Strait Of Hormuz Strategic Ambiguity Stuart Levey Stuart Seldowitz Student Debt Stuff White People Like Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subhas Chandra Bose Subprime Mortgage Crisis Suburb Suella Braverman Sugar Suicide Superintelligence Supreme Court Surveillance Susan Glasser Svidomy Sweden Switzerland Symington Amendment Syria Syrian Civil War Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Take Action Taliban Talmud Tariff Tatars Taxation Taxes Tea Party Technical Considerations Technology Ted Cruz Telegram Television Terrorism Terrorists Terry McAuliffe Tesla Testing Testosterone Tests Texas THAAD Thailand The 10/7 Project The AK The American Conservative The Bell Curve The Bible The Black Autumn The Cathedral The Confederacy The Constitution The Eight Banditos The Family The Free World The Great Awokening The Left The Middle East The New York Times The South The States The Zeroth Amendment To The Constitution Theranos Theresa May Third World Thomas Jefferson Thomas Moorer Thought Crimes Tiananmen Massacre Tibet Tiger Mom TikTok TIMSS Tom Cotton Tom Massie Tom Wolfe Tony Blair Tony Blinken Tony Kleinfeld Too Many White People Torture Trade Trains Trans Fat Trans Fats Transgender Transgenderism Transhumanism Translation Translations Transportation Travel Trayvon Martin Trolling True Redneck Stereotypes Trump Trump Derangement Syndrome Trust Tsarist Russia Tucker Carlson Tulsa Tulsi Gabbard Turkey Turks TWA 800 Twins Twitter Ucla UFOs UK Ukrainian Crisis UN Security Council Unbearable Whiteness Unemployment Unions United Kingdom United Nations United Nations General Assembly United Nations Security Council United States Universal Basic Income UNRWA Urbanization Ursula Von Der Leyen Uruguay US Blacks US Capitol Storming 2021 US Civil War II US Constitution US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 US Regionalism USA USAID USS Liberty USSR Uyghurs Uzbekistan Vaccination Vaccines Valdimir Putin Valerie Plame Vdare Venezuela Vibrancy Victoria Nuland Victorian England Video Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Vikings Viktor Orban Viktor Yanukovych Violence Vioxx Virginia Virginia Israel Advisory Board Vitamin D Vivek Ramaswamy Vladimir Zelensky Volodymur Zelenskyy Volodymyr Zelensky Vote Fraud Voter Fraud Voting Rights Voting Rights Act Vulcan Society Wall Street Walmart Wang Ching Wei Wang Jingwei War War Crimes War Guilt War In Donbass War On Christmas War On Terror War Powers War Powers Act Warhammer Washington DC WASPs Watergate Wealth Wealth Inequality Wealthy Web Traffic Weight WEIRDO Welfare Wendy Sherman West Bank Western Decline Western European Marriage Pattern Western Hypocrisy Western Media Western Religion Western Revival Westerns White America White Americans White Death White Flight White Guilt White Helmets White Liberals White Man's Burden White Nakba White Nationalism White Nationalists White People White Privilege White Slavery White Supremacy White Teachers Whiterpeople Whites Who Whom Whoopi Goldberg Wikileaks Wikipedia Wildfires William Browder William F. Buckley William Kristol William Latson William McGonagle William McRaven WINEP Winston Churchill Woke Capital Women Woodrow Wilson Workers Working Class World Bank World Economic Forum World Health Organization World Population World Values Survey World War G World War H World War Hair World War I World War III World War R World War T World War Weed WTF WVS WWII Xi Jinping Xinjiang Yahya Sinwar Yair Lapid Yemen Yevgeny Prigozhin Yoav Gallant Yogi Berra's Restaurant Yoram Hazony YouTube Yugoslavia Yuval Noah Harari Zbigniew Brzezinski Zimbabwe Zionism Zionists Zvika Fogel
Nothing found
All Commenters •ï¿½My
Comments
•ï¿½Followed
Commenters
�⇅All / On "Podcast"
    When Tulsi Gabbard, nominee to be the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), was asked by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence what she thought of Russia Today (RT), she replied: “RT News is a propaganda arm of the Russian state government and is not a reliable source of objective news reporting.†This was one of...
  • Twitter is known to ban accounts that contradict The Narrative(TM), so it’s not surprising that the Russian point of view is underrepresented there. But what about the Web generally? It seems that unz.com — to pick an example close to home — has some very impressive internet traffic figures for a ‘rogue’ website, and it’s also a generally pro-Russian website. Does that not count for anything?

    Also: who exactly is RT’s target demographic? They seems to perennially chase the Leftwing in the West, which hates Russia with a burning passion and therefore won’t RT the time of day. Why not re-orient themselves a bit more around the Rightwing in West? Or is Putin intent on alienating them, too? Or is it simply that RT English is targeted at some other demographic, perhaps in the Third World? That would make some sense. They sure don’t seem to interested in courting native speakers of English — at least not those who could realistically be won over.

  • There are several moments.
    – Twitter is blocked in Russia, and it’s not surprising that there’s little representation of the Russian point of view.
    – In Ukraine, the British have created a powerful structure – the Center for Psychological Operations, and they are widely represented on the Internet and yet here on unz.com.
    – The moderation of the Russian-speaking part of many services like Youtube is based in Ukraine and the Baltic States. They run wild there.

  • anonymous[112] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:

    EU chief Von der Leyen is reported as giving the order to ban RT and Russian media, precisely because the EU was aware the 2022 Russian incursion into Ukraine was LEGAL by the precedent of the Kosovo case the EU and NATO won in the Hague in 2010 … and Von der Leyen wanted to hide this from EU citizens

    Region of Kosovo declared independence from Serbia (like Donbass from Russia) – LEGAL
    rebel region asks outside nation(s) for help – LEGAL
    outside party provided military help, NATO for Kosovo, Russia for Donbass – LEGAL

  • @Curmudgeon
    The difference between Russia and the US is that Russia has state sponsored corporate media and the US has corporate media sponsored government.
    How about we add to C P Snow's observation:
    "Yet we slink about like whipped curs:;... our self-abasement principally takes the form of subservience to the United States:;... we are under no necessity to participate in the American nightmare of a Soviet monster barely held at bay in all quarters of the globe by an inconceivable nuclear armament and by political intervention everywhere from Poland to Cambodia. It is the Americans who need us in order to act out their crazy scenario... We simply do not need to go chasing up and down after the vagaries of the next ignoramus to become President of the United States." ~ Enoch Powell
    Change the country names and everything else fits today.

    Replies: @Charles

    Any quotation from one of the great writers of the 20th Century deserves approbation. So here it is!

  • @John Johnson
    @Boiling the Frog

    It’s a good discipline to assess the information source separately from the information itself

    It's not simply a matter of discipline when the videos are posted to telegram in Russian. You can't just browse them like youtube.

    and an online TV channel that has been banned in Azerbaijan is pretty low on the credibility scale.

    With no mention of why the government tried to block their website from the public.

    They released a video that embarrassed the government. That is what started a backlash by the government along with all kind of accusations.

    I know Russians are expected to by a lot of their own gear but the headline “Russians no longer want to fight and die for Putin†is patently absurd given Russia’s mobilization effort consists entirely of contract volunteers.

    I'm not commenting on the title. I pointed out the mismatched camo and lack of basic gear in cell phone videos recorded by Russians.

    Who knows, but let’s face it, it’s not hard to dress up a bunch of PoW’s and film them bitching about poor gear. I’m sure both sides do it.

    Russia is on video using Chinese 4x4 buggies, passenger vehicles, quads, tractor carts, and T-54s. Yes that means tanks from 1954. The Russian government recently admitted that they have a potato shortage.

    But you are suggesting that Ukraine faked a cell phone video to make it look like they have uniform shortages? You really think that is the most likely scenario?

    I was just making the same point Helmer does about trying to determine truth from videos on social media. This war like no other is flooded with fake social media content – more so from the NATO side simply because they dedicate more resources to the info war.

    You and other posters here are like the children of the picture.

    If it isn't a pied piper blogger telling you what you want to hear then you dismiss it as fake news or propaganda. You don't want an open exchange of ideas. What you really want is a changing of the guard. Instead of Katie Couric you want Scott Ritter or Pepe Escobar to have a one dimensional show with zero debate. Good Morning America with Pepe. That is what you really want. You find conflicting information to be threatening.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    Short of direct intervention Russia has clearly sliced off a few pound of territory from the Ukies.

  • anon[314] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:

    @anon[314] is right , the only way to get out of the bubbles or to get some semblance of truth is to read from all sides and through the lines to deduct what is really going on.

    We all know that western media are under control as much as Russian ones or Iranians ones, but by consulting various media and alternative ones from several countries (translation tools make it possible today), we find out what is going on.

    And since all of them, from Biden, Trump, Putin and others have some very clear agendas they want to push like CDBC, digital Id’s, Ai, it is quite clear that they are part of a big club which we don;t belong to and their sad jokes are mostly on us.

  • @Boiling the Frog
    @John Johnson

    "Most of their videos are from telegram. Meaning they were posted by Russians" - the logic being that if I post content on Telegram I'm Russian?

    It's a good discipline to assess the information source separately from the information itself and an online TV channel that has been banned in Azerbaijan is pretty low on the credibility scale. I know Russians are expected to by a lot of their own gear but the headline "Russians no longer want to fight and die for Putin" is patently absurd given Russia's mobilization effort consists entirely of contract volunteers. Is is genuine? Who knows, but let's face it, it's not hard to dress up a bunch of PoW's and film them bitching about poor gear. I'm sure both sides do it.

    I was just making the same point Helmer does about trying to determine truth from videos on social media. This war like no other is flooded with fake social media content - more so from the NATO side simply because they dedicate more resources to the info war.

    Replies: @John Johnson

    It’s a good discipline to assess the information source separately from the information itself

    It’s not simply a matter of discipline when the videos are posted to telegram in Russian. You can’t just browse them like youtube.

    and an online TV channel that has been banned in Azerbaijan is pretty low on the credibility scale.

    With no mention of why the government tried to block their website from the public.

    They released a video that embarrassed the government. That is what started a backlash by the government along with all kind of accusations.

    I know Russians are expected to by a lot of their own gear but the headline “Russians no longer want to fight and die for Putin†is patently absurd given Russia’s mobilization effort consists entirely of contract volunteers.

    I’m not commenting on the title. I pointed out the mismatched camo and lack of basic gear in cell phone videos recorded by Russians.

    Who knows, but let’s face it, it’s not hard to dress up a bunch of PoW’s and film them bitching about poor gear. I’m sure both sides do it.

    Russia is on video using Chinese 4�4 buggies, passenger vehicles, quads, tractor carts, and T-54s. Yes that means tanks from 1954. The Russian government recently admitted that they have a potato shortage.

    But you are suggesting that Ukraine faked a cell phone video to make it look like they have uniform shortages? You really think that is the most likely scenario?

    I was just making the same point Helmer does about trying to determine truth from videos on social media. This war like no other is flooded with fake social media content – more so from the NATO side simply because they dedicate more resources to the info war.

    You and other posters here are like the children of the picture.

    If it isn’t a pied piper blogger telling you what you want to hear then you dismiss it as fake news or propaganda. You don’t want an open exchange of ideas. What you really want is a changing of the guard. Instead of Katie Couric you want Scott Ritter or Pepe Escobar to have a one dimensional show with zero debate. Good Morning America with Pepe. That is what you really want. You find conflicting information to be threatening.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Wokechoke
    @John Johnson

    Short of direct intervention Russia has clearly sliced off a few pound of territory from the Ukies.
  • John, did you know this [1][2]?

    No wonder that Putin’s United Russia has majority in their parliament (Duma) and brought most NWO/WEF agendas (from Dear Karl, as Putin calls him) in place like 15 million Muslim “migrants” [3][4] and Digital Ruble [5].

    Excerpt from [1]: Few people know or care that Washington used to subsidize Putin’s “United Russia†party to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars. But Victoria Nuland spilled the beans on this 10 years ago.

    Excerpt from [2]: State Department: United Russia programs were financed from the US. United Russia received grants from the US Agency for International Development (USAID), said State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland. According to her, the party participated in “some” programs of the International Republican Institute (IRI) and the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs (NDI).

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    [1] There is No Proof That Putin is a Russian Patriot | Rurik Skywalker / Rolo Slavskiy Substack | 2025-02
    https://slavlandchronicles.substack.com/p/there-is-no-proof-that-putin-is-a

    [2] State Department: United Russia programs were financed from the US
    · Original Link: https://www.rbc.ru/politics/21/09/2012/5703fd3d9a7947fcbd440ac0
    · Google Translate: https://www.rbc-ru.translate.goog/politics/21/09/2012/5703fd3d9a7947fcbd440ac0?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    [3] Bastrykin: Such a migration policy is a threat to Russia’s national security | 2024-06
    • Original Link: https://eadaily.com/ru/news/2024/06/27/bastrykin-takaya-migracionnaya-politika-ugroza-nacionalnoy-bezopasnosti-rossii
    • Google Translate: https://eadaily-com.translate.goog/ru/news/2024/06/27/bastrykin-takaya-migracionnaya-politika-ugroza-nacionalnoy-bezopasnosti-rossii?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en

    [4] Bastrykin’s migration campaign. Under whose banners are the fighters of the NWO called? | 2024-06
    • Original Link: https://47news.ru/articles/253015/
    • Google Translate: https://47news-ru.translate.goog/articles/253015/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    [5] Putin calls for “full-scale implementation” of Digital Ruble | Riley Waggaman / Edward Slavsquat Substack | 2024-07
    https://edwardslavsquat.substack.com/p/putin-calls-for-full-scale-implementation

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    #russia-globalist-colony #russia-occupied #putin-colonial-administrator #putin-globalist-agent #putin-trojan-horse #putin-young-global-leader #putin-pupil-of-klaus-schwab #putin-pupil-of-kissinger #putin-traitor-of-russia #putin-liar #putin-high-treason #putin-backstabber #putin-imported-15-million-muslim-migrants #putin-csto-lie #putin-who-compliant #putin-wef-compliant #putin-accessory-to-nato-crimes

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    750+ Anon001 Comments Archive @ The Unz Review | TUR
    https://www.unz.com/comments/all/?commenterfilter=anon001
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  • @John Johnson
    @Boiling the Frog

    Who pays the piper at Kanal 13 – USAID?

    Are you trying to dismiss the video based on the source?

    Most of their videos are from telegram. Meaning they were posted by Russians.

    Or are you suggesting the video was fabricated?

    Not convinced. I think Stalin actually had a better military at the time

    �
    Of course, there is no comparison in that all important quality; quantity.

    No I meant at an individual level. I believe the Soviet soldiers in 1945 were better equipped than current Russian soldiers at the front. The Soviet soldiers had better winter gear and rations. They lacked AK-47s but I would take Soviet gear of 1945 even if it meant having a semi-auto rifle. Proper boots and gloves are invaluable in freezing weather. The Soviets also had wool coats while there are multiple videos of Russians in what looks like cheap camo from a sports store.

    Replies: @Boiling the Frog

    “Most of their videos are from telegram. Meaning they were posted by Russians” – the logic being that if I post content on Telegram I’m Russian?

    It’s a good discipline to assess the information source separately from the information itself and an online TV channel that has been banned in Azerbaijan is pretty low on the credibility scale. I know Russians are expected to by a lot of their own gear but the headline “Russians no longer want to fight and die for Putin” is patently absurd given Russia’s mobilization effort consists entirely of contract volunteers. Is is genuine? Who knows, but let’s face it, it’s not hard to dress up a bunch of PoW’s and film them bitching about poor gear. I’m sure both sides do it.

    I was just making the same point Helmer does about trying to determine truth from videos on social media. This war like no other is flooded with fake social media content – more so from the NATO side simply because they dedicate more resources to the info war.

    •ï¿½Replies: @John Johnson
    @Boiling the Frog

    It’s a good discipline to assess the information source separately from the information itself

    It's not simply a matter of discipline when the videos are posted to telegram in Russian. You can't just browse them like youtube.

    and an online TV channel that has been banned in Azerbaijan is pretty low on the credibility scale.

    With no mention of why the government tried to block their website from the public.

    They released a video that embarrassed the government. That is what started a backlash by the government along with all kind of accusations.

    I know Russians are expected to by a lot of their own gear but the headline “Russians no longer want to fight and die for Putin†is patently absurd given Russia’s mobilization effort consists entirely of contract volunteers.

    I'm not commenting on the title. I pointed out the mismatched camo and lack of basic gear in cell phone videos recorded by Russians.

    Who knows, but let’s face it, it’s not hard to dress up a bunch of PoW’s and film them bitching about poor gear. I’m sure both sides do it.

    Russia is on video using Chinese 4x4 buggies, passenger vehicles, quads, tractor carts, and T-54s. Yes that means tanks from 1954. The Russian government recently admitted that they have a potato shortage.

    But you are suggesting that Ukraine faked a cell phone video to make it look like they have uniform shortages? You really think that is the most likely scenario?

    I was just making the same point Helmer does about trying to determine truth from videos on social media. This war like no other is flooded with fake social media content – more so from the NATO side simply because they dedicate more resources to the info war.

    You and other posters here are like the children of the picture.

    If it isn't a pied piper blogger telling you what you want to hear then you dismiss it as fake news or propaganda. You don't want an open exchange of ideas. What you really want is a changing of the guard. Instead of Katie Couric you want Scott Ritter or Pepe Escobar to have a one dimensional show with zero debate. Good Morning America with Pepe. That is what you really want. You find conflicting information to be threatening.

    Replies: @Wokechoke
  • @Boiling the Frog
    @John Johnson

    Who pays the piper at Kanal 13 - USAID?

    Not convinced. I think Stalin actually had a better military at the time
    �
    Of course, there is no comparison in that all important quality; quantity.

    Replies: @John Johnson

    Who pays the piper at Kanal 13 – USAID?

    Are you trying to dismiss the video based on the source?

    Most of their videos are from telegram. Meaning they were posted by Russians.

    Or are you suggesting the video was fabricated?

    Not convinced. I think Stalin actually had a better military at the time

    Of course, there is no comparison in that all important quality; quantity.

    No I meant at an individual level. I believe the Soviet soldiers in 1945 were better equipped than current Russian soldiers at the front. The Soviet soldiers had better winter gear and rations. They lacked AK-47s but I would take Soviet gear of 1945 even if it meant having a semi-auto rifle. Proper boots and gloves are invaluable in freezing weather. The Soviets also had wool coats while there are multiple videos of Russians in what looks like cheap camo from a sports store.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Boiling the Frog
    @John Johnson

    "Most of their videos are from telegram. Meaning they were posted by Russians" - the logic being that if I post content on Telegram I'm Russian?

    It's a good discipline to assess the information source separately from the information itself and an online TV channel that has been banned in Azerbaijan is pretty low on the credibility scale. I know Russians are expected to by a lot of their own gear but the headline "Russians no longer want to fight and die for Putin" is patently absurd given Russia's mobilization effort consists entirely of contract volunteers. Is is genuine? Who knows, but let's face it, it's not hard to dress up a bunch of PoW's and film them bitching about poor gear. I'm sure both sides do it.

    I was just making the same point Helmer does about trying to determine truth from videos on social media. This war like no other is flooded with fake social media content - more so from the NATO side simply because they dedicate more resources to the info war.

    Replies: @John Johnson
  • @John Johnson
    @Anon001

    "he always keeps his friends......unless he kills them or looks the other way as they are overthrown"

    Russians are today better at fighting their enemies than they have been since 1945.

    Not convinced. I think Stalin actually had a better military at the time.

    Stalin provided every soldier with a basic uniform and weapon in 1945. Everyone had standard kit.

    Today's Russian military POWs speak of buying their own rations and even weapons.

    Notice the mismatched camo (not for snow), lack of gloves and properly boots in this picture:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O6GXxlQO_Ns

    Replies: @Boiling the Frog, @Wokechoke

    Meanwhile the key question is answered.

    Candace Owens wants to get Ryan Reynolds’s deported.

    I thought it was to be John Oliver, but perhaps the Canadian was the real problem. Lol.

  • anon[314] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:

    Nice marketing pitch, that will possibly induce readers to click on the links and visit the site, and maybe buy a book.

    Few things however

    “Mao Zedong”, really? Why not Pol Pot or Stalin as well?

    Social media users are in fact brainwashed into short texts, short term thinking, emotion instead of thinking and bombardment of distractions. Basically it creates people with concentration issues and psychological problems & addiction as observed by specialists studying the effects of smartphone and social media on kids.

    Twitter is about slogans contrary to ‘long read’. Nobody ever developed real thought by using slogans which are made for marketing , advertising or propaganda.

    In the same vein as what famous characters impersonated by a robot are “saying”, if you want to read inconvenient facts and disturbing truths, I recommend also:

    https://slavlandchronicles.substack.com

    But really, podcasts are no more than TV shows but on the web, so I don’t see why people would think they are more reliable. This is not the format or genre that is more reliable but the people doing them.

    The overwhelming pro-Ukrainian propaganda in the West and therefore on all social media including X is of course no indication of truth but rather typical western bias. Maybe chatgpt should have studied TikTok and Telegram too.

    Or maybe we should not rely on biased tools like Ai to build judgement that we can make ourselves much better.

    Which brings the question on how will brainwashing and propaganda be accelerated hundred times fold with tools like Ai.

    The only way to escape biases and get out of self constructed or conformable bubbles is to take news from all sides, even those we don’t like.

  • @John Johnson
    @Anon001

    "he always keeps his friends......unless he kills them or looks the other way as they are overthrown"

    Russians are today better at fighting their enemies than they have been since 1945.

    Not convinced. I think Stalin actually had a better military at the time.

    Stalin provided every soldier with a basic uniform and weapon in 1945. Everyone had standard kit.

    Today's Russian military POWs speak of buying their own rations and even weapons.

    Notice the mismatched camo (not for snow), lack of gloves and properly boots in this picture:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O6GXxlQO_Ns

    Replies: @Boiling the Frog, @Wokechoke

    Who pays the piper at Kanal 13 – USAID?

    Not convinced. I think Stalin actually had a better military at the time

    Of course, there is no comparison in that all important quality; quantity.

    •ï¿½Replies: @John Johnson
    @Boiling the Frog

    Who pays the piper at Kanal 13 – USAID?

    Are you trying to dismiss the video based on the source?

    Most of their videos are from telegram. Meaning they were posted by Russians.

    Or are you suggesting the video was fabricated?

    Not convinced. I think Stalin actually had a better military at the time

    �
    Of course, there is no comparison in that all important quality; quantity.

    No I meant at an individual level. I believe the Soviet soldiers in 1945 were better equipped than current Russian soldiers at the front. The Soviet soldiers had better winter gear and rations. They lacked AK-47s but I would take Soviet gear of 1945 even if it meant having a semi-auto rifle. Proper boots and gloves are invaluable in freezing weather. The Soviets also had wool coats while there are multiple videos of Russians in what looks like cheap camo from a sports store.

    Replies: @Boiling the Frog
  • They understood it was impossible by means other than force

    It was impossible? WHAT was impossible?

  • ChatGPT does more than measure this and report the metrics. It concludes that the metric is the truth

    Hallelujah, empiricism’s final victory, the Truth itself has now been conquered by Science. As AI seeps into every field of human inquiry, artificial truth will inexorably supplant the old fashioned notion of truth we still cling to. At the end of the Age of Reason lies the omniscient God-machine. Until then I will continue to read John Helmer – and not because Artificial Chekhov said I should.

  • @Anon001
    Re Snow's Rule

    C.P. Snow put into the mouth of an ambitious cabinet minister he knew in London a half-century ago. “As a rule you couldn’t win over your enemies, but you could lose your friends.â€
    �

    Throughout his career, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin has accepted and followed the Snow rule: he always keeps his friends, the Russian ones.
    �
    Putin does not care to keep Russia's friends. Just ask Serbia, Libya, Armenia, Syria, etc.

    I think VVP rule is: "I'll never stop trying to win over Russia's enemies, by betraying and losing all of Russia's friends."

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    #russia-globalist-colony #russia-occupied #putin-colonial-administrator #putin-globalist-agent #putin-trojan-horse #putin-young-global-leader #putin-pupil-of-klaus-schwab #putin-pupil-of-kissinger #putin-traitor-of-russia #putin-liar #putin-high-treason #putin-backstabber #putin-imported-15-million-muslim-migrants #putin-csto-lie #putin-who-compliant #putin-wef-compliant #putin-accessory-to-nato-crimes

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    750+ Anon001 Comments Archive @ The Unz Review | TUR
    https://www.unz.com/comments/all/?commenterfilter=anon001
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Replies: @John Johnson

    “he always keeps his friends……unless he kills them or looks the other way as they are overthrown”

    Russians are today better at fighting their enemies than they have been since 1945.

    Not convinced. I think Stalin actually had a better military at the time.

    Stalin provided every soldier with a basic uniform and weapon in 1945. Everyone had standard kit.

    Today’s Russian military POWs speak of buying their own rations and even weapons.

    Notice the mismatched camo (not for snow), lack of gloves and properly boots in this picture:


    Video Link

    •ï¿½Troll: Notsofast
    •ï¿½Replies: @Boiling the Frog
    @John Johnson

    Who pays the piper at Kanal 13 - USAID?

    Not convinced. I think Stalin actually had a better military at the time
    �
    Of course, there is no comparison in that all important quality; quantity.

    Replies: @John Johnson
    , @Wokechoke
    @John Johnson

    Meanwhile the key question is answered.

    Candace Owens wants to get Ryan Reynolds’s deported.

    I thought it was to be John Oliver, but perhaps the Canadian was the real problem. Lol.
  • The difference between Russia and the US is that Russia has state sponsored corporate media and the US has corporate media sponsored government.
    How about we add to C P Snow’s observation:
    “Yet we slink about like whipped curs:;… our self-abasement principally takes the form of subservience to the United States:;… we are under no necessity to participate in the American nightmare of a Soviet monster barely held at bay in all quarters of the globe by an inconceivable nuclear armament and by political intervention everywhere from Poland to Cambodia. It is the Americans who need us in order to act out their crazy scenario… We simply do not need to go chasing up and down after the vagaries of the next ignoramus to become President of the United States.” ~ Enoch Powell
    Change the country names and everything else fits today.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Charles
    @Curmudgeon

    Any quotation from one of the great writers of the 20th Century deserves approbation. So here it is!
  • “The two men dined alone. They ate parsley soup, whiting, roast veal, cabinet pudding; they drank whisky and soda. Lord Copper explained Nazism, Fascism and Communism; later, in his ghastly library, he outlined the situation in the Far East. “The Beast stands for strong mutually antagonistic governments everywhere,†he said. “Self-sufficiency at home, self-assertion abroad.†Mr. Salter’s side of the conversation was limited to expressions of assent. When Lord Copper was right, he said, “Definitely, Lord Copperâ€; when he was wrong, “Up to a point.†“Let me see, what’s the name of the place I mean? Capital of Japan? Yokohama, isn’t it?†“Up to a point, Lord Copper.†“And Hong Kong belongs to us, doesn’t it?†“Definitely, Lord Copper.â€
    ― Evelyn Waugh, Scoop

  • The following short quote/comment [1], IMHO captures perfectly Putin’s Western-manager / liberal-globalist style of handling, or rather mishandling, of pretty much everything including Ukraine. That comment is from 2022 and still applies – nothing has changed.

    Here it is:

    Quoting [1]: It looks like Putin and his close advisors are trying to run a war on neoliberal lines. That relies on extreme parsimony, a just-enough just-in-time approach to logistics, reliance on managerial magic, a contempt for the enemy that works in the enemy’s favor, and an indifference to the well-being of the people doing the heavy lifting (not to mention the people abandoned in the withdrawals). It’s a corporate mentality, based on fantasies crafted by crackpot intellectuals.

    [1] Comment by “James” under “Ukraine’s counterattack: Unheeded warnings from Russia’s pro-war hardliners” | Riley Waggaman / Edward Slavsquat Substack | 2022-09
    https://edwardslavsquat.substack.com/p/ukraines-counterattack-unheeded-warnings/comments#comment-9073705

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    #russia-globalist-colony #russia-occupied #putin-colonial-administrator #putin-globalist-agent #putin-trojan-horse #putin-young-global-leader #putin-pupil-of-klaus-schwab #putin-pupil-of-kissinger #putin-traitor-of-russia #putin-liar #putin-high-treason #putin-backstabber #putin-imported-15-million-muslim-migrants #putin-csto-lie #putin-who-compliant #putin-wef-compliant #putin-accessory-to-nato-crimes

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    750+ Anon001 Comments Archive @ The Unz Review | TUR
    https://www.unz.com/comments/all/?commenterfilter=anon001
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  • Re Snow’s Rule

    C.P. Snow put into the mouth of an ambitious cabinet minister he knew in London a half-century ago. “As a rule you couldn’t win over your enemies, but you could lose your friends.â€

    Throughout his career, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin has accepted and followed the Snow rule: he always keeps his friends, the Russian ones.

    Putin does not care to keep Russia’s friends. Just ask Serbia, Libya, Armenia, Syria, etc.

    I think VVP rule is: “I’ll never stop trying to win over Russia’s enemies, by betraying and losing all of Russia’s friends.”

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    #russia-globalist-colony #russia-occupied #putin-colonial-administrator #putin-globalist-agent #putin-trojan-horse #putin-young-global-leader #putin-pupil-of-klaus-schwab #putin-pupil-of-kissinger #putin-traitor-of-russia #putin-liar #putin-high-treason #putin-backstabber #putin-imported-15-million-muslim-migrants #putin-csto-lie #putin-who-compliant #putin-wef-compliant #putin-accessory-to-nato-crimes

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    750+ Anon001 Comments Archive @ The Unz Review | TUR
    https://www.unz.com/comments/all/?commenterfilter=anon001
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    •ï¿½Agree: Digital Samizdat
    •ï¿½Troll: Notsofast
    •ï¿½Replies: @John Johnson
    @Anon001

    "he always keeps his friends......unless he kills them or looks the other way as they are overthrown"

    Russians are today better at fighting their enemies than they have been since 1945.

    Not convinced. I think Stalin actually had a better military at the time.

    Stalin provided every soldier with a basic uniform and weapon in 1945. Everyone had standard kit.

    Today's Russian military POWs speak of buying their own rations and even weapons.

    Notice the mismatched camo (not for snow), lack of gloves and properly boots in this picture:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O6GXxlQO_Ns

    Replies: @Boiling the Frog, @Wokechoke
  • I appeared at the Russians With Attitude (Patreon) podcast, which is run by a couple of easygoing Russian nationalist intellectuals called pigdog (@diogen_tv) and Kirill Kaminets (@noetic_pirate). Also this week's Open Thread.
  • sher singh [AKA "Jatt Aryaa"] says:
    @Mikel
    @AltanBakshi


    the very crux of our debate is the Buddhist claim that there is a rebirth or continuum of mental aggregates. I am not claiming that science supports us, but similarly there is not strong enough scientific case that denies such possibility
    �
    Well, this is a bit like saying that there is no strong scientific case to deny that thunders are caused by angry gods.

    We now know quite well what causes thunder and what happens to our body, including our brain, when we die.

    Perhaps in a very profound and mysterious way the Amazon forest natives who believe that thunder is caused by angry gods are right and we, civilized people, are wrong.

    But if we go to those extremes of doubting everything that reason tells us our very conversation becomes pointless. You might as well say that 2+2 may be 5 and we are wrong in blindly assuming that 2+2=4, just because that is what modern mathematics teaches us. What is mathematics after all, not even mathematicians know where mathematics come from, you could very well argue (and you would be right). But rational communication becomes very difficult under such premises.

    And besides, it doesn't work that way. Scientists have no obligation to prove how we are not reborn into another creature after we die. It is those who make that extraordinary claim who must produce some evidence that this is true. But this has never been been observed. There is no empirical evidence of that phenomenon.

    I am in fact very careful not to take our current scientific knowledge as any ultimate truth. As I said in my previous comment, I don't believe that our species is capable if having a full understanding of the universe, which puts me in disagreement with most top physicists. Besides, I know firsthand that scientists are just ordinary human beings and scientific research is not all pure and noble. There are whole fields of science that are too corrupted by politics to be taken seriously.

    What I do find indisputable is that science and reason are superior to mythical and beliefs-based explanations of reality. The explanation of thunder as the rapid expansion of air following a lightning bolt is clearly superior in my mind to "the gods must be angry and that's why we hear that frightening sound in the sky".

    Replies: @AltanBakshi, @sher singh

    How do we seperate the liberalism and white supremacy inherent in your implicit claims of individualism and egalitarianism being ‘inherently’ better.

    For most of us, religion is a political and sociological not theological position.

    We don’t much care what people believe or don’t, it has no bearing on us.

    What people do with them, the political positions and social systems affect us all.

    Now, science has produced racism, ie the systemic categorization and stereotyping of people and animals into categories; which, the science oriented state & bureaucracy has then used to make judgment and policy.

    What we’re contesting I guess, is that the scientific method is the only valid & ‘objective’ means of acquiring knowledge.

    Now, we know objectivism is one of the cores of white fragility, how do you answer to this??

    https://libjournal.uncg.edu/ijcp/article/viewFile/249/116

  • @Dmitry
    @AaronB

    China and India vote against Israel in the UN, but in terms of policies China is one of the most pro-Israel countries, under current CCP leadership.

    Chinese government builds much of the new housing and infrastructure in Israel, much like in Ethiopia. When I have last visited Israel in 2018, I saw many groups Chinese government looking workers, near the business parks, and large Chinese infrastructure projects with Chinese flags, such as the vast holes where they dig tunnels under the city of Tel Aviv and Ramat Gan.

    There is more hidden and informal Chinese power projection in countries like Spain and UK. In Spain, Chinese people seem to own much small convenience shops, while in UK, there are many Chinese elite living in large numbers and probably buying apartments. In Israel, the Chinese power projection seems less secretive, more formal, and more composing of government workers.

    I assume Chinese investment in Israel is related to "Belt and Road Initiative". China's government buy strategic assets in Israel, like its ports, and it even bought Israel's dairy collective farms (and then they import this milk which is collectively farmed in the Middle East, into China).

    China may be interested in Israel, because they view it as a potential trading connection between Mediterranean Sea and the Indian Ocean (via its port on the Red Sea).

    If I was Chinese, I would feel that investing in Israel was cleverer than investing in Ethiopia. In many ways, Israel has third world African standards. For example, in construction safety, Israel is more like an African country, than a European country, and hundreds of Chinese construction workers have been killed in Israel. But in terms of property rights, Israel is safer to invest in than probably almost all African countries. There won't suddenly be a revolution and dictatorship in Israel that would expropriate foreign investors, whereas in Ethiopia the Chinese probably underestimate African political instability

    Replies: @Blinky Bill, @blatnoi, @Blinky Bill

    [MORE]

  • @Mikel
    @AltanBakshi


    the very crux of our debate is the Buddhist claim that there is a rebirth or continuum of mental aggregates. I am not claiming that science supports us, but similarly there is not strong enough scientific case that denies such possibility
    �
    Well, this is a bit like saying that there is no strong scientific case to deny that thunders are caused by angry gods.

    We now know quite well what causes thunder and what happens to our body, including our brain, when we die.

    Perhaps in a very profound and mysterious way the Amazon forest natives who believe that thunder is caused by angry gods are right and we, civilized people, are wrong.

    But if we go to those extremes of doubting everything that reason tells us our very conversation becomes pointless. You might as well say that 2+2 may be 5 and we are wrong in blindly assuming that 2+2=4, just because that is what modern mathematics teaches us. What is mathematics after all, not even mathematicians know where mathematics come from, you could very well argue (and you would be right). But rational communication becomes very difficult under such premises.

    And besides, it doesn't work that way. Scientists have no obligation to prove how we are not reborn into another creature after we die. It is those who make that extraordinary claim who must produce some evidence that this is true. But this has never been been observed. There is no empirical evidence of that phenomenon.

    I am in fact very careful not to take our current scientific knowledge as any ultimate truth. As I said in my previous comment, I don't believe that our species is capable if having a full understanding of the universe, which puts me in disagreement with most top physicists. Besides, I know firsthand that scientists are just ordinary human beings and scientific research is not all pure and noble. There are whole fields of science that are too corrupted by politics to be taken seriously.

    What I do find indisputable is that science and reason are superior to mythical and beliefs-based explanations of reality. The explanation of thunder as the rapid expansion of air following a lightning bolt is clearly superior in my mind to "the gods must be angry and that's why we hear that frightening sound in the sky".

    Replies: @AltanBakshi, @sher singh

    What I do find indisputable is that science and reason are superior to mythical and beliefs-based explanations of reality. The explanation of thunder as the rapid expansion of air following a lightning bolt is clearly superior in my mind to “the gods must be angry and that’s why we hear that frightening sound in the skyâ€.

    A model case of false equivalency. Scientists can agree about the nature of thunder, and can explain how it arises or is produced, but they cant agree on the nature of mind and where it arises.

    Science is useful tool, but can you make ethics based on the science, or build morality out of pure reason? They tried that during the French and Russian revolutions…

    We now know quite well what causes thunder and what happens to our body, including our brain, when we die.

    We dont know what happens to mind after death. There isnt even knowledge what happens inside persons mind after death, but we have empirical evidence that there is lots of brain activity after persons death, even after decapitation.

    But if we go to those extremes of doubting everything that reason tells us our very conversation becomes pointless. You might as well say that 2+2 may be 5 and we are wrong in blindly assuming that 2+2=4, just because that is what modern mathematics teaches us. What is mathematics after all, not even mathematicians know where mathematics come from, you could very well argue (and you would be right). But rational communication becomes very difficult under such premises.

    Extremes of doubting? Who defines what is extreme or not, and in my opinion my examples have not been as radically sceptical as you imply.

    And besides, it doesn’t work that way. Scientists have no obligation to prove how we are not reborn into another creature after we die. It is those who make that extraordinary claim who must produce some evidence that this is true. But this has never been been observed. There is no empirical evidence of that phenomenon.

    This is funny example of subjectivity of acceptable criteria. For us Buddhists to claim that mind stream annihilates after death is something that is not logical at all, and if someone claims so then he must produce evidence for it. All phenomena, energy and particles change forms and position, but nothing is ever annihilated out of existence, that such thing would happen for mind, is for us wild and crazy claim.

    Here is what H.H. Dalai Lama says about the science and Buddhism:
    “I have often said that if science proves facts that conflict with Buddhist understanding, Buddhism must change accordingly. We should always adopt a view that accords with the facts. If upon investigation we find that there is reason and proof for a point, then we should accept it. However, a clear distinction should be made between what is not found by science and what is found to be nonexistent by science. What science finds to be nonexistent we should all accept as nonexistent, but what science merely does not find is a completely different matter. An example is consciousness itself. Although sentient beings, including humans, have experienced consciousness for centuries, we still do not know what consciousness actually is: its complete nature and how it functions.”

    We have already made some changes, at least in our school, His Holiness has urged that we should not anymore follow old Buddhist cosmological models, because the science has proven that they are wrong.

    We have a very large system of epistemology, how to know what are acceptable and valid means of knowledge.https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a6/2_Pramana_Epistemology_Buddhism.svg/642px-2_Pramana_Epistemology_Buddhism.svg.png
    The basis for all knowledge is perception, but there are two other ways to gain knowledge, inference, or reasoning that if there is smoke, there must be fire, but its still not as sure way to know as to perceive the fire directly, and then we have trusted sources which for us are the words of the Buddha or Buddhavacana, still its not as reliable as direct perception, but Buddha left us instructions and guidelines how to test the validity of his statements. I personally know monks who have themselves directly experienced the truth of rebirth, and actually one of those monks promised to me that I could myself perceive that truth if I would go for an extremely long retreat and practice with him, I havent gone (yet?) but I trust my Geshes as valid sources of knowledge, I understand perfectly if others dont trust, its okay, everyone makes his own choices, choices that are always subjective…

  • I read a new article

    Russia Lost 5M Migrants During Pandemic
    https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2020/12/16/russia-lost-5m-migrants-during-pandemic-a72373

    and got curious. Year or two ago Russian government announced easier migration path of ethnic Russians from abroad. What are the results so far?

  • Great Brexit success…for EU as in own words of “ardent Brexit supporter” it now “gives excellent access to supply chains, automotive talent and target markets” 😉

    Sir Jim Ratcliffe, formerly the UK’s wealthiest person and an ardent Brexit supporter, announced this week that plans to build a new car manufacturing factory in Wales have been scrapped in favour of a site in France.

    As a no-deal Brexit looms, the announcement was a blow to Bridgend where former Ford workers and residents were expecting a boost from the new factory following the closure of the 40-year-old Ford plant in September.

    In a statement, Ineos Automotive, headed by Sir Ratcliffe, said the new site in Moselle, France, “gives excellent access to supply chains, automotive talent and target markets”.

    The billionaire described the move as a “unique opportunity”.

    https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/jim-ratcliffe-billionaire-brexiteer-who-19441353

  • dfordoom says: •ï¿½Website
    @songbird
    @dfordoom

    City-to-city passenger rockets seem flat out crazy to me. There's no possible way that they would ever be as safe as planes, as they experience much greater forces. Sure, they'll get you there faster, but who is in that kind of rush?

    That said, bigger rockets are very useful, if they can provide cheaper mass to orbit.

    And in theory, manned space flight would be very useful, if colonies become practicable. That's a real question mark, though. Mars gravity might not be enough, for normal fetal development, even if the other kinks can be worked out. Sure, in theory, pregnant women could live onboard centripedal trains, but that seems too far-fetched. Especially, if civilization is going down the tubes.

    Replies: @dfordoom

    And in theory, manned space flight would be very useful, if colonies become practicable. That’s a real question mark, though. Mars gravity might not be enough, for normal fetal development, even if the other kinks can be worked out. Sure, in theory, pregnant women could live onboard centripedal trains, but that seems too far-fetched.

    We may have to accept the unpleasant truth that there is nowhere in the solar system worth colonising.

    Especially, if civilization is going down the tubes.

    Yep.

    Another problem with space colonies – given the demographic collapse of the entire developed world is it plausible that space colonies could survive without continuing supplies of new colonists from Earth to keep the numbers up? Does anyone believe that space colonists are all going to have six kids?

    If the space colonies on Mars or wherever end up with fertility rates way below replacement level is there any point to them? If the supply of new colonists from Earth dries up (extremely possible if governments on Earth suddenly decide to pull the plug on the space program for budgetary reasons) the Martian colonies would quickly die out.

  • @AltanBakshi
    @Mikel


    Buddha not showing any evidence of having understood scientific concepts that we now teach our children in elementary school and saying that there must have been some genetic modification that allowed our species (or previous ones) to achieve Buddhist enlightenment are quite different arguments. But they do have in common that they insist in analyzing religious claims from a cold rational perspective, if that’s what you mean.
    �
    .
    What religious or mythological there is in claiming that beings crave things, desire happiness, and try to avoid or avert uncomfortable states of being, or that there exists ignorance regarding the nature of subjective phenomena? Lets take a junkie and a doctor, its a totally subjective question to say whose more happy, right? But its clear that a doctor has less ignorance regarding the nature of phenomena, for he understood that trough hard work even unpleasant things can become sources of happiness, unlike the junkie who constantly escapes to momentarily happiness that is given by drugs. But both the doctor and junkie are driven by pursuit of happiness. There isnt anything inherently religious or mythological in questions like these, and such questions form the basis of our religion and the quest for enlightenment.

    I am aware of the problem of defining what an observer is in quantum mechanics. But this is a very deep scientific issue at the very edge of our ability to understand reality. My understanding is that physicists don’t really know what constitutes an observation but they do know through repeated experiments that our observation makes wave functions collapse.

    Other than that, there is no scientific dispute about the fact that anything of what we call mental activities takes place through our brains.

    �
    I dont know anything about quantum mechanics, but the very crux of our debate is the Buddhist claim that there is a rebirth or continuum of mental aggregates. I am not claiming that science supports us, but similarly there is not strong enough scientific case that denies such possibility, and I really mean it. How we see reality is inherently subjective, there is no objective reality accessible to us, or do you claim otherwise?

    Its little bit hard to argue with you, because I am not sure of your position, do you claim that mind is purely product of materialist-chemical interaction, or do you claim that we dont know surely but only science can give us, not maybe definite, but at least somehow trustworthy answers?

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_theories_of_consciousness
    Even reading just this link you will see that there are serious proponents of such theories as there are opponents, because Im not scientist I cant say who is right and it seems to me that even scientists cant say.

    I have a question for you, if there are two brothers who have a similar upbringing and background, why then another brother can end up in a totally different way after hearing just couple kind words from some wise person? You cant possibly deny that people are not capable of changing by hearing some words put together, if those words are inspirational or engaging? If change is possible in such way, then its clear that there is a subjective and qualitative element in our lives, which cant be reduced into a purely materialistic model. If you claim otherwise then you are making claims that science is not making, or if you claim that science will one day know that the materialist model is correct, then thats not science, but claiming that your subjective unvalified and untested hypothesis regarding the workings of the mind is correct.

    By the way I really know from my life such case of two brothers, another one is a physician and another one was an ex biker criminal who is now dead, because he committed a suicide.

    Hmm if purely materialist explanation of our mind is true, then in such situation I think that there would be no free will, all in our mind would strictly follow electro chemical causal processes, in such situation world would be purely deterministic, and our discussion would be more or less pointless, because we couldnt choose what to believe, but everything in our mind is just purely produced by genes and chemical processes.

    Happily there is legit and robust scientific evidence that meditation and Buddhist practices can change our brain to better.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/inspired-life/wp/2015/05/26/harvard-neuroscientist-meditation-not-only-reduces-stress-it-literally-changes-your-brain/?outputType=amp

    "Mindfulness meditation increased thickness in the prefrontal cortex and parietal lobes, both linked to attention control, while compassion-based meditation showed increases in the limbic system, which processes emotions, and the anterior insula, which helps bring emotions into conscious awareness."
    https://www.newscientist.com/article/2149489-different-meditation-types-train-distinct-parts-of-your-brain/

    So its clear even from a scientific viewpoint that our practices do bring beneficial results. Mindfulness or Vipassana is just one practice among many Buddhist meditation practices. Remember that Buddha never demanded anyone to believe anything, not at all, he just found a path to true happiness, but how can we know if his words are true? The Buddha has answer for that, he said that come and test my path, and you can yourself see if there are results or not, and decide if you want to go further on that path.

    I myself have been a content on that path, yes there are often problems and obstacles, but such is life, still better to move on some direction than to stay in present state that is clearly not optimal.

    One funny( or is it?) fact:
    I literally cant find cases when Buddhists have persecuted or harassed atheists, but there are thousands of cases when atheists have killed and slaughtered Buddhists, only in Soviet Buryatia of the 1930s, Soviet state atheism led to killing of 18 000 Buryat Buddhist monks. In those times there were only 400 000 buryats in whole Russia. Same happened in Mongolia, Cambodia, Tibet and China. There are some intellectually dishonest atheist individuals who claim that communists were not somehow atheistic, but they were, there is even now a rule in China that only atheists can become members of the communist party of China.
    http://asiarussia.ru/articles/13979/

    Replies: @Mikel

    the very crux of our debate is the Buddhist claim that there is a rebirth or continuum of mental aggregates. I am not claiming that science supports us, but similarly there is not strong enough scientific case that denies such possibility

    Well, this is a bit like saying that there is no strong scientific case to deny that thunders are caused by angry gods.

    We now know quite well what causes thunder and what happens to our body, including our brain, when we die.

    Perhaps in a very profound and mysterious way the Amazon forest natives who believe that thunder is caused by angry gods are right and we, civilized people, are wrong.

    But if we go to those extremes of doubting everything that reason tells us our very conversation becomes pointless. You might as well say that 2+2 may be 5 and we are wrong in blindly assuming that 2+2=4, just because that is what modern mathematics teaches us. What is mathematics after all, not even mathematicians know where mathematics come from, you could very well argue (and you would be right). But rational communication becomes very difficult under such premises.

    And besides, it doesn’t work that way. Scientists have no obligation to prove how we are not reborn into another creature after we die. It is those who make that extraordinary claim who must produce some evidence that this is true. But this has never been been observed. There is no empirical evidence of that phenomenon.

    I am in fact very careful not to take our current scientific knowledge as any ultimate truth. As I said in my previous comment, I don’t believe that our species is capable if having a full understanding of the universe, which puts me in disagreement with most top physicists. Besides, I know firsthand that scientists are just ordinary human beings and scientific research is not all pure and noble. There are whole fields of science that are too corrupted by politics to be taken seriously.

    What I do find indisputable is that science and reason are superior to mythical and beliefs-based explanations of reality. The explanation of thunder as the rapid expansion of air following a lightning bolt is clearly superior in my mind to “the gods must be angry and that’s why we hear that frightening sound in the sky”.

    •ï¿½Replies: @AltanBakshi
    @Mikel


    What I do find indisputable is that science and reason are superior to mythical and beliefs-based explanations of reality. The explanation of thunder as the rapid expansion of air following a lightning bolt is clearly superior in my mind to “the gods must be angry and that’s why we hear that frightening sound in the skyâ€.
    �
    A model case of false equivalency. Scientists can agree about the nature of thunder, and can explain how it arises or is produced, but they cant agree on the nature of mind and where it arises.

    Science is useful tool, but can you make ethics based on the science, or build morality out of pure reason? They tried that during the French and Russian revolutions...

    We now know quite well what causes thunder and what happens to our body, including our brain, when we die.
    �
    We dont know what happens to mind after death. There isnt even knowledge what happens inside persons mind after death, but we have empirical evidence that there is lots of brain activity after persons death, even after decapitation.

    But if we go to those extremes of doubting everything that reason tells us our very conversation becomes pointless. You might as well say that 2+2 may be 5 and we are wrong in blindly assuming that 2+2=4, just because that is what modern mathematics teaches us. What is mathematics after all, not even mathematicians know where mathematics come from, you could very well argue (and you would be right). But rational communication becomes very difficult under such premises.
    �
    Extremes of doubting? Who defines what is extreme or not, and in my opinion my examples have not been as radically sceptical as you imply.

    And besides, it doesn’t work that way. Scientists have no obligation to prove how we are not reborn into another creature after we die. It is those who make that extraordinary claim who must produce some evidence that this is true. But this has never been been observed. There is no empirical evidence of that phenomenon.
    �
    This is funny example of subjectivity of acceptable criteria. For us Buddhists to claim that mind stream annihilates after death is something that is not logical at all, and if someone claims so then he must produce evidence for it. All phenomena, energy and particles change forms and position, but nothing is ever annihilated out of existence, that such thing would happen for mind, is for us wild and crazy claim.

    Here is what H.H. Dalai Lama says about the science and Buddhism:
    "I have often said that if science proves facts that conflict with Buddhist understanding, Buddhism must change accordingly. We should always adopt a view that accords with the facts. If upon investigation we find that there is reason and proof for a point, then we should accept it. However, a clear distinction should be made between what is not found by science and what is found to be nonexistent by science. What science finds to be nonexistent we should all accept as nonexistent, but what science merely does not find is a completely different matter. An example is consciousness itself. Although sentient beings, including humans, have experienced consciousness for centuries, we still do not know what consciousness actually is: its complete nature and how it functions."

    We have already made some changes, at least in our school, His Holiness has urged that we should not anymore follow old Buddhist cosmological models, because the science has proven that they are wrong.

    We have a very large system of epistemology, how to know what are acceptable and valid means of knowledge.
    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a6/2_Pramana_Epistemology_Buddhism.svg
    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a6/2_Pramana_Epistemology_Buddhism.svg/642px-2_Pramana_Epistemology_Buddhism.svg.png
    The basis for all knowledge is perception, but there are two other ways to gain knowledge, inference, or reasoning that if there is smoke, there must be fire, but its still not as sure way to know as to perceive the fire directly, and then we have trusted sources which for us are the words of the Buddha or Buddhavacana, still its not as reliable as direct perception, but Buddha left us instructions and guidelines how to test the validity of his statements. I personally know monks who have themselves directly experienced the truth of rebirth, and actually one of those monks promised to me that I could myself perceive that truth if I would go for an extremely long retreat and practice with him, I havent gone (yet?) but I trust my Geshes as valid sources of knowledge, I understand perfectly if others dont trust, its okay, everyone makes his own choices, choices that are always subjective...
    , @sher singh
    @Mikel

    How do we seperate the liberalism and white supremacy inherent in your implicit claims of individualism and egalitarianism being 'inherently' better.

    For most of us, religion is a political and sociological not theological position.

    We don't much care what people believe or don't, it has no bearing on us.

    What people do with them, the political positions and social systems affect us all.

    Now, science has produced racism, ie the systemic categorization and stereotyping of people and animals into categories; which, the science oriented state & bureaucracy has then used to make judgment and policy.

    What we're contesting I guess, is that the scientific method is the only valid & 'objective' means of acquiring knowledge.

    Now, we know objectivism is one of the cores of white fragility, how do you answer to this??

    https://libjournal.uncg.edu/ijcp/article/viewFile/249/116
  • @dfordoom
    @mal


    Well, nobody died in Starship case, but in a way you are correct. Titanic may have sank, but large ocean cruise liners continued to be built and operated and became a successful industry. You could get a cruise ticket fairly cheaply. Same will happen in space.
    �
    The difference is that ocean liners were actually useful. Manned spaceflight is not useful.

    Replies: @songbird

    City-to-city passenger rockets seem flat out crazy to me. There’s no possible way that they would ever be as safe as planes, as they experience much greater forces. Sure, they’ll get you there faster, but who is in that kind of rush?

    That said, bigger rockets are very useful, if they can provide cheaper mass to orbit.

    And in theory, manned space flight would be very useful, if colonies become practicable. That’s a real question mark, though. Mars gravity might not be enough, for normal fetal development, even if the other kinks can be worked out. Sure, in theory, pregnant women could live onboard centripedal trains, but that seems too far-fetched. Especially, if civilization is going down the tubes.

    •ï¿½Replies: @dfordoom
    @songbird


    And in theory, manned space flight would be very useful, if colonies become practicable. That’s a real question mark, though. Mars gravity might not be enough, for normal fetal development, even if the other kinks can be worked out. Sure, in theory, pregnant women could live onboard centripedal trains, but that seems too far-fetched.
    �
    We may have to accept the unpleasant truth that there is nowhere in the solar system worth colonising.

    Especially, if civilization is going down the tubes.
    �
    Yep.

    Another problem with space colonies - given the demographic collapse of the entire developed world is it plausible that space colonies could survive without continuing supplies of new colonists from Earth to keep the numbers up? Does anyone believe that space colonists are all going to have six kids?

    If the space colonies on Mars or wherever end up with fertility rates way below replacement level is there any point to them? If the supply of new colonists from Earth dries up (extremely possible if governments on Earth suddenly decide to pull the plug on the space program for budgetary reasons) the Martian colonies would quickly die out.
  • Navalny posted a positive tweet on the successful Angara A5 launch. As expected many of his followers were not happy.

  • @Mikel
    @AltanBakshi

    Your English looks surprisingly good to me, considering that you had little formal education in English language.

    I can think of authors that have posted on this site and still show a much more rudimentary English than yours after having lived in the US for many years. In my view anyway, I am not a native English speaker myself.

    sometimes you are a little bit too repetitive with your arguments
    �
    I can bore to death anyone talking about natural landscapes, mountains, weather and climate but I am not aware of having used repetitive arguments with you.

    Buddha not showing any evidence of having understood scientific concepts that we now teach our children in elementary school and saying that there must have been some genetic modification that allowed our species (or previous ones) to achieve Buddhist enlightenment are quite different arguments. But they do have in common that they insist in analyzing religious claims from a cold rational perspective, if that's what you mean.

    Maybe it's my fault but I cannot evaluate any sort of claims in any other way if I want to make sense of what I read.

    there is no consensus at all in the scientific community what mind is and how does it arise, all purely materialist models of consciousness cant explain how consciousness arises from non conscious matter.
    �
    No, sorry, I don't agree with that and I don't find the links you have provided to the work of a philosopher and a musical therapist very helpful.

    I am aware of the problem of defining what an observer is in quantum mechanics. But this is a very deep scientific issue at the very edge of our ability to understand reality. My understanding is that physicists don't really know what constitutes an observation but they do know through repeated experiments that our observation makes wave functions collapse.

    Other than that, there is no scientific dispute about the fact that anything of what we call mental activities takes place through our brains.

    As for quantum mechanics, I think that the fact that we are unable to fully understand nature and that only some very privileged individuals are able to grasp the most advanced subjects is very unsurprising. We are just an animal species with limited brain capabilities. If we were the only species capable of understanding everything, that would be truly suggestive of some God-like phenomenon, not the other way around.

    there is empirical evidence that there some kind of field of energy in our brains, and changes in that field do change our consciousness, also electro magnetic fields dont just disappear into nothingness.
    �
    Quite honestly, I think that citing this in support of any transcendental explanation of our existence is grasping at straws.

    Chemical and very weak electric reactions occur inside the brains of any animal species. I'm not sure what exactly happens to the very last electric activity in the human brain before an individual dies. My guess is that it just vanishes as it performs the duty of supplying energy for neuronal processes and that is that.

    To be credible, the idea that these weak electric currents somehow survive after a homo sapiens dies and transform him into another living creature requires a huge amount of empirical evidence that is clearly nowhere to be seen.

    I guess that in Buddha's time and many centuries afterwards these notions of "mind", "soul", "energy" as separate from the material reality were perfectly natural. Not only people then (like now) needed to find explanations to their existence but these ideas were not too departed from their knowledge and everyday experience. I doubt I would have been an atheist in those times. Sadly perhaps, we now know a lot more about the universe where we live but the time for mythical explanations of reality is gone.

    Replies: @AltanBakshi

    Buddha not showing any evidence of having understood scientific concepts that we now teach our children in elementary school and saying that there must have been some genetic modification that allowed our species (or previous ones) to achieve Buddhist enlightenment are quite different arguments. But they do have in common that they insist in analyzing religious claims from a cold rational perspective, if that’s what you mean..

    What religious or mythological there is in claiming that beings crave things, desire happiness, and try to avoid or avert uncomfortable states of being, or that there exists ignorance regarding the nature of subjective phenomena? Lets take a junkie and a doctor, its a totally subjective question to say whose more happy, right? But its clear that a doctor has less ignorance regarding the nature of phenomena, for he understood that trough hard work even unpleasant things can become sources of happiness, unlike the junkie who constantly escapes to momentarily happiness that is given by drugs. But both the doctor and junkie are driven by pursuit of happiness. There isnt anything inherently religious or mythological in questions like these, and such questions form the basis of our religion and the quest for enlightenment.

    I am aware of the problem of defining what an observer is in quantum mechanics. But this is a very deep scientific issue at the very edge of our ability to understand reality. My understanding is that physicists don’t really know what constitutes an observation but they do know through repeated experiments that our observation makes wave functions collapse.

    Other than that, there is no scientific dispute about the fact that anything of what we call mental activities takes place through our brains.

    I dont know anything about quantum mechanics, but the very crux of our debate is the Buddhist claim that there is a rebirth or continuum of mental aggregates. I am not claiming that science supports us, but similarly there is not strong enough scientific case that denies such possibility, and I really mean it. How we see reality is inherently subjective, there is no objective reality accessible to us, or do you claim otherwise?

    Its little bit hard to argue with you, because I am not sure of your position, do you claim that mind is purely product of materialist-chemical interaction, or do you claim that we dont know surely but only science can give us, not maybe definite, but at least somehow trustworthy answers?

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_theories_of_consciousness
    Even reading just this link you will see that there are serious proponents of such theories as there are opponents, because Im not scientist I cant say who is right and it seems to me that even scientists cant say.

    I have a question for you, if there are two brothers who have a similar upbringing and background, why then another brother can end up in a totally different way after hearing just couple kind words from some wise person? You cant possibly deny that people are not capable of changing by hearing some words put together, if those words are inspirational or engaging? If change is possible in such way, then its clear that there is a subjective and qualitative element in our lives, which cant be reduced into a purely materialistic model. If you claim otherwise then you are making claims that science is not making, or if you claim that science will one day know that the materialist model is correct, then thats not science, but claiming that your subjective unvalified and untested hypothesis regarding the workings of the mind is correct.

    By the way I really know from my life such case of two brothers, another one is a physician and another one was an ex biker criminal who is now dead, because he committed a suicide.

    Hmm if purely materialist explanation of our mind is true, then in such situation I think that there would be no free will, all in our mind would strictly follow electro chemical causal processes, in such situation world would be purely deterministic, and our discussion would be more or less pointless, because we couldnt choose what to believe, but everything in our mind is just purely produced by genes and chemical processes.

    Happily there is legit and robust scientific evidence that meditation and Buddhist practices can change our brain to better.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/inspired-life/wp/2015/05/26/harvard-neuroscientist-meditation-not-only-reduces-stress-it-literally-changes-your-brain/?outputType=amp

    “Mindfulness meditation increased thickness in the prefrontal cortex and parietal lobes, both linked to attention control, while compassion-based meditation showed increases in the limbic system, which processes emotions, and the anterior insula, which helps bring emotions into conscious awareness.”
    https://www.newscientist.com/article/2149489-different-meditation-types-train-distinct-parts-of-your-brain/

    So its clear even from a scientific viewpoint that our practices do bring beneficial results. Mindfulness or Vipassana is just one practice among many Buddhist meditation practices. Remember that Buddha never demanded anyone to believe anything, not at all, he just found a path to true happiness, but how can we know if his words are true? The Buddha has answer for that, he said that come and test my path, and you can yourself see if there are results or not, and decide if you want to go further on that path.

    I myself have been a content on that path, yes there are often problems and obstacles, but such is life, still better to move on some direction than to stay in present state that is clearly not optimal.

    One funny( or is it?) fact:
    I literally cant find cases when Buddhists have persecuted or harassed atheists, but there are thousands of cases when atheists have killed and slaughtered Buddhists, only in Soviet Buryatia of the 1930s, Soviet state atheism led to killing of 18 000 Buryat Buddhist monks. In those times there were only 400 000 buryats in whole Russia. Same happened in Mongolia, Cambodia, Tibet and China. There are some intellectually dishonest atheist individuals who claim that communists were not somehow atheistic, but they were, there is even now a rule in China that only atheists can become members of the communist party of China.
    http://asiarussia.ru/articles/13979/

    •ï¿½Replies: @Mikel
    @AltanBakshi


    the very crux of our debate is the Buddhist claim that there is a rebirth or continuum of mental aggregates. I am not claiming that science supports us, but similarly there is not strong enough scientific case that denies such possibility
    �
    Well, this is a bit like saying that there is no strong scientific case to deny that thunders are caused by angry gods.

    We now know quite well what causes thunder and what happens to our body, including our brain, when we die.

    Perhaps in a very profound and mysterious way the Amazon forest natives who believe that thunder is caused by angry gods are right and we, civilized people, are wrong.

    But if we go to those extremes of doubting everything that reason tells us our very conversation becomes pointless. You might as well say that 2+2 may be 5 and we are wrong in blindly assuming that 2+2=4, just because that is what modern mathematics teaches us. What is mathematics after all, not even mathematicians know where mathematics come from, you could very well argue (and you would be right). But rational communication becomes very difficult under such premises.

    And besides, it doesn't work that way. Scientists have no obligation to prove how we are not reborn into another creature after we die. It is those who make that extraordinary claim who must produce some evidence that this is true. But this has never been been observed. There is no empirical evidence of that phenomenon.

    I am in fact very careful not to take our current scientific knowledge as any ultimate truth. As I said in my previous comment, I don't believe that our species is capable if having a full understanding of the universe, which puts me in disagreement with most top physicists. Besides, I know firsthand that scientists are just ordinary human beings and scientific research is not all pure and noble. There are whole fields of science that are too corrupted by politics to be taken seriously.

    What I do find indisputable is that science and reason are superior to mythical and beliefs-based explanations of reality. The explanation of thunder as the rapid expansion of air following a lightning bolt is clearly superior in my mind to "the gods must be angry and that's why we hear that frightening sound in the sky".

    Replies: @AltanBakshi, @sher singh
  • @Europe Europa
    @szonyi


    The Chinese are obsessed with their history. The typical Chinese is more familiar with their history, and historical allusions, references are a much bigger part of their culture and language than in the West. Chinese history and their massive corpus of historical literature along with poetry play the role in cultural consciousness that the Bible and literature and popular culture play in the West.
    �
    A lot of their interest in history seems very political though, like they will try to link the oldest archaeological sites they have to the modern day Han Chinese when in many cases there's no evidence to do so.

    It would be like if there was a political agenda in England to link Stonehenge to the modern English, which there isn't and anyone who attempted to make such a link would be laughed at at best and probably considered a mentally unhinged "racist". I have no doubt that if Stonehenge was in China, the Chinese would say it was built by the Han.

    Replies: @szonyi

    Well archaeology isn’t the same thing as history. History proper refers to written records, along with other accounts and material artifacts if they’re available. The Chinese obsession and interest in their history I refer to is via their historical literature which is from roughly the time of Classical Greece and later to medieval times.

    Stonehenge is from 3,000 BC and thus much older, and it’s as far as we know prehistoric since there haven’t been any accompanying written records discovered.

    I believe there is some genetic connection between the modern English and the ancient Britons who built Stonehenge. But one reason the connection is not affirmed as strongly or at all by modern Britons is because the historical population movements and invasions into the British Isles over the past 2500 years by Celts, Romans, Vikings, Danes, and Anglo-Saxons. Modern Britons typically identify primarily with these groups and as being their descendants.

    By contrast, China did not have these large population and cultural changes in the same period. There were small populations that invaded and conquered the government, such as the Mongols, but they were typically small and adopted Chinese ways and language, unlike the Celts or Anglo-Saxons who imposed or replaced their language and culture in Britain.

    Because of China and East Asia’s isolation from other population groups by geographic barriers such as the Gobi and the Himalayas, archaeologists do tend to connect prehistoric archaeological sites in China to ancestral Chinese.

  • dfordoom says: •ï¿½Website
    @mal
    @dfordoom

    Well, nobody died in Starship case, but in a way you are correct. Titanic may have sank, but large ocean cruise liners continued to be built and operated and became a successful industry. You could get a cruise ticket fairly cheaply. Same will happen in space.

    Replies: @dfordoom

    Well, nobody died in Starship case, but in a way you are correct. Titanic may have sank, but large ocean cruise liners continued to be built and operated and became a successful industry. You could get a cruise ticket fairly cheaply. Same will happen in space.

    The difference is that ocean liners were actually useful. Manned spaceflight is not useful.

    •ï¿½Replies: @songbird
    @dfordoom

    City-to-city passenger rockets seem flat out crazy to me. There's no possible way that they would ever be as safe as planes, as they experience much greater forces. Sure, they'll get you there faster, but who is in that kind of rush?

    That said, bigger rockets are very useful, if they can provide cheaper mass to orbit.

    And in theory, manned space flight would be very useful, if colonies become practicable. That's a real question mark, though. Mars gravity might not be enough, for normal fetal development, even if the other kinks can be worked out. Sure, in theory, pregnant women could live onboard centripedal trains, but that seems too far-fetched. Especially, if civilization is going down the tubes.

    Replies: @dfordoom
  • Mikel says:
    @Dmitry
    @blatnoi


    you could understand Hebrew
    �
    I have completed most of the Duolingo levels now for Hebrew. Although to be honest, my brain still finds it easier to understand languages I've never even studied like Italian.

    and get rid of the Eilat airport (although I think that’s already done maybe)

    �
    Yes they removed the airport from Eilat, and they constructed a new airport in the desert (on a border with Jordan).

    They had to build one of the highest fences, to protect the new airport from potential missiles fired, as it's directly on the border with Jordan, and you could probably shoot down planes from the desert on the other side of the border. I'd wonder how safe that location really is.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrAG3rPJ71M

    fast rail, to Eilat the entire time I was there.

    �
    First proposal for this train was in 2012. The approval to begin (planning) for the first section was passed in June 2020. https://www.railjournal.com/infrastructure/first-section-of-israels-eilat-line-approved/

    So it surely won't be completed for years (unless China really helps them).

    However, train from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem has opened finally (after apparently18 years of planning and construction - they build a lot of bridges and tunnels, but it was performed before China began investing in Israel).

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHuas5hNsZc

    Replies: @Mikel

    my brain still finds it easier to understand languages I’ve never even studied like Italian.

    I can relate to that. The first couple of summers I spent in London during my early teens I probably learned more Italian than English, being all the time sorrunded by noisy Italians of my age.

    There is something musical and contagious about the Italian language (or the people who speak it, I’m not sure).

  • Mikel says:
    @AltanBakshi
    @Mikel

    Sorry Mikel that I called you boring, because you are not, but sometimes you are a little bit too repetitive with your arguments.

    Last time I didnt have time nor patience to reply to your comment in a way that it deserved, for our Dharma is not very simple thing to explain to those who are not part of our weltanschauung/merkwelt, its like explaining chemistry to some one who had never heard about periodic table or structural formulas of molecules. Then there is my limited capability to express myself properly in English. I do understand almost everything that is written in that language, but I often have a lack of finesse when explaining more delicate and nuanced details of our philosophy. I must confess that I have had very little formal education in English language.

    There is no scientifically proven theory of anything. Proofs belong to the realm of mathematics or logic, not to natural sciences that only deal with evidences in favor of one theory until it is empirically falsified.

    So the most you can hope for is that some scientific theory will provisionally be consistent with whatever religious/mythical ideas your religious group came up with to explain things that were then poorly understood.
    �
    I very well know that there is no guaranteed truth in natural sciences, but as I explained you previously, there is no consensus at all in the scientific community what mind is and how does it arise, all purely materialist models of consciousness cant explain how consciousness arises from non conscious matter. You can google yourself and see how lost the scientists are with this problem, they cant even agree what consciousness is. Some links that I found by googling:
    https://uh.edu/~garson/IMNotes5.htm
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27498903/

    But in fact, that everything we call mind is just the result of our brain activity is not disputed nowadays. We know this with a huge amount of certainty because if we injure our brains we damage our mental abilities. And if we die, there ceases to be any mental activity detectable anywhere from the dead person. Brains stop functioning after they stop receiving blood and any manifestation of their activity therefore stops as well.
    �
    Well, this is quite good argument, and I would even myself use it against Buddhist schools that are purely Idealistic. Yes, I should have explained to you previously that there are different Buddhist schools of philosophy, some are idealistic and believe that mind is the basis for all, some are atomist, and even believe that our consciousness arises when particles are in correct configuration and our suffering arises when we become attached to the illusory and non persistent forms made by the interaction of the atoms, and our sense of self is just by product of such interaction. So such Buddhism is somewhat materialistic.
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhist_atomism
    But I am myself a follower of the Madhyamaka or the Middle Way school of Buddhist philosophy, and we deny the view that mind is not dependent on matter, as we also deny that matter has independent existence from the mind, or maybe I should say that we cant access or define objectively what some particular matter/object is. There is always mental designation inputed by our mind. Every moment and everything is product of various causal relations, lets take as example something like some random rock on the forest, for some creature the rock can be totally meaningless, for some other it can be valuable building material for tools or buildings, or maybe even source of ores, or even inspiration for art, but is the rock something independently, does it have its own identity that is not dependent on perceiver? Clearly how creatures see the rock is dependent on numerous factors, some are more constructive in a literal sense and some more pointless. Then if there is a reason for us to perceive something in someway and if that reason is dependent on various causal factors, then it must be possible for us to change the factors and by changing the factors our perception of rock changes profoundly. If something like rock can have various meanings depending on perceiver, and how the perceiver mentally designates something, then various problems of our life can be mentally designated in a different way. Yes this is one problem with a purely materialistic worldview, if our mind is product of matter in some configuration, why then creatures react in different ways to same impulses, some hate pain and then there are people who are masochistic, do they have a physical problems in brain, have they detected that masochists have different brains, is there a structural difference between brains of a gay or a hetero man, or between an atheist and a Christian? And even if there is, are those differences results of different ways to believe and interact with the world or were they just "born in such way," as some liberal faggots love to claim.

    Here is by the way interesting article regarding the brains, yes clearly mind needs brains to exist, but still things are not as simple as you possibly imply.
    https://www.businessinsider.com/the-man-who-lived-a-normal-life-with-almost-no-brain-2015-10?amp&r=US&IR=T
    And remember what I earlier posted to you about electro magnetic fields and the workings of our brains, there is empirical evidence that there some kind of field of energy in our brains, and changes in that field do change our consciousness, also electro magnetic fields dont just disappear into nothingness.

    About the different Buddhist schools, I should have explained you previously that we have numerous competing schools of Buddhism, that debate about how we can attain the enlightenment, or which way is the quickest etc, there is quite much variation between our schools, but we all agree on some basic points, and have very good relations with each other. After all Buddha very much emphasized how important is to test his teachings, just as one tests the quality of gold(our monks just love to repeat that),and even taught for different peoples in different ways.

    Yes, I would assume that you don’t care much about people being atheists. There are so many (and in so increasing numbers) of us. Your life would be quite miserable if you did.

    �
    Its like you want that atheists would be a problem for us? Yes they were a huge problem for us in the form of Communist state atheism, but as long as they dont persecute us we really dont have any problems with them, and historically we did have a pleasant co existence with them in ancient times.

    The only Buddhists I have ever met (one of them a very good friend of mine) were of the Western/hippie type and I couldn’t take them too seriously.
    �
    My knowledge and level of practice are very rudimentary and basic in relation to Geshes or graduated monks of our school, and Im quite lazy Buddhist, when I was a teen I was more of a cultural Buddhist but philosophically atheist materialist. Heck its not a long time ago when I started to do daily practice, and I still try to cut it short. Mikel in Buddhism serious practitioners are only those who have taken some kind of vows, lay or monastic.

    Hmm I should still explain to you one thing about the Dharma, because clearly you have some confusion regarding the question of what Buddhahood or enlightenment is and what is psychological or mental the basis for such state.


    The poison of craving

    Think about fly, fly craves something, it craves for food, it has this constant craving, it needs food, it is only happy when it will get food. It desires to be happy in its own way, right? It tries to avoid unpleasant sensations, like ants or swatting, right? So it can be said that it has somekind of rudimentary consciousness, very simple, nothing too sophisticated, right? It can even discern between nice and not nice feelings, so it has somekind of capability to make judgments between mental objects, it clearly has somekind of mental designation for them. This Mikel is the very basis of Buddhahood! Fly cant analyse its mental patterns, but we humans can and with a hard work we can step by step create sources of more and more stable and permanent happiness, than just eating or sex.

    The poison of ignorance

    So we suffer because there are nice things and sensations that we want, but they are not permanent, and then there are things that we dont enjoy, that we try to avoid. But its not only that, we also suffer because we think that non permanent and non fixed phenomena can be basis for a real happiness, that is the poison of craving. We crave, we constantly crave something, but even though we fulfill our desires there is always something lacking, we are never truly content. Sex is an excellent example of this. First you go sometimes to a hooker, then its not enough and you need couple of them and some coke, and one day even thats not enough etc... And so the hunger grows, but why it is so? Why some are more content with things and some more greedy? Its because of ignorance, because we have an ignorant view of some phenomena, that we believe that they are true sources of happiness and input erroneous qualities into them, or mentally designate them in such way that leads to suffering. The fly is too much prisoner of its material or fixed form, so it cant differentiate between sources of happiness, therefore it cant become enlightened as long as its a fly.

    The poison of aversion

    Then there are things that we hate, that are uncomfortable, this is quite self explanatory for all people, but why it is so? Because we believe that some phenomena have more or less a permanently unpleasant effect, so we try our best in avoiding them, consciously or instinctively. But such belief arises from mistaken view that phenomenas are fixed, or that we have something fixed in us that denies us to be happy in some other ways that we imagine.

    So all these three poisons are dependent on various causal factors and how we perceive the reality, they are not fixed nor permanent, but as long as we have these three regarding internal or external phenomena, as long we will not be enlightened. These are the three poisons that give birth to Samsara according to the Buddha. Some schools believe that after extinction of these three poisons ones consciousness is severed from this reality, and one cant even say what the world is for such beings who have undergone such transformation. This is the view of Theravadins, that we of Mahayana disparagingly call as followers of a Small Vehicle or Hinayana. But we of the Mahayana or pf the Great Vehicle believe that after the purification of our mind from the poisons we will see the world as it truly is, that our mind is fully liberated from all defilements, then we see all other beings in such undefiled state and will strive eternally to liberate all beings, which has no beginning has no ending, we will toil eternally for the salvation of all beings when we are Buddhas. That is the Aryan or Noble view of Mahayana. Also that is what we mean by talking that Buddhas dont have discriminating awareness, meaning that they lack aversion, craving and ignorance, or that all is empty for them, after all they have themselves empirically and intuitively understood that all phenomenas are not fixed, and that they dont have their own nature independent of perceiver, their true nature is non nature and so on. But oh well that is another and very complicated but deeply related topic.

    Oh well my travel was pleasantly spend by writing this barebones explanation of some elementary Buddhist facts to you. I hope that there arent too many typos.

    Replies: @Mikel

    Your English looks surprisingly good to me, considering that you had little formal education in English language.

    I can think of authors that have posted on this site and still show a much more rudimentary English than yours after having lived in the US for many years. In my view anyway, I am not a native English speaker myself.

    sometimes you are a little bit too repetitive with your arguments

    I can bore to death anyone talking about natural landscapes, mountains, weather and climate but I am not aware of having used repetitive arguments with you.

    Buddha not showing any evidence of having understood scientific concepts that we now teach our children in elementary school and saying that there must have been some genetic modification that allowed our species (or previous ones) to achieve Buddhist enlightenment are quite different arguments. But they do have in common that they insist in analyzing religious claims from a cold rational perspective, if that’s what you mean.

    Maybe it’s my fault but I cannot evaluate any sort of claims in any other way if I want to make sense of what I read.

    there is no consensus at all in the scientific community what mind is and how does it arise, all purely materialist models of consciousness cant explain how consciousness arises from non conscious matter.

    No, sorry, I don’t agree with that and I don’t find the links you have provided to the work of a philosopher and a musical therapist very helpful.

    I am aware of the problem of defining what an observer is in quantum mechanics. But this is a very deep scientific issue at the very edge of our ability to understand reality. My understanding is that physicists don’t really know what constitutes an observation but they do know through repeated experiments that our observation makes wave functions collapse.

    Other than that, there is no scientific dispute about the fact that anything of what we call mental activities takes place through our brains.

    As for quantum mechanics, I think that the fact that we are unable to fully understand nature and that only some very privileged individuals are able to grasp the most advanced subjects is very unsurprising. We are just an animal species with limited brain capabilities. If we were the only species capable of understanding everything, that would be truly suggestive of some God-like phenomenon, not the other way around.

    there is empirical evidence that there some kind of field of energy in our brains, and changes in that field do change our consciousness, also electro magnetic fields dont just disappear into nothingness.

    Quite honestly, I think that citing this in support of any transcendental explanation of our existence is grasping at straws.

    Chemical and very weak electric reactions occur inside the brains of any animal species. I’m not sure what exactly happens to the very last electric activity in the human brain before an individual dies. My guess is that it just vanishes as it performs the duty of supplying energy for neuronal processes and that is that.

    To be credible, the idea that these weak electric currents somehow survive after a homo sapiens dies and transform him into another living creature requires a huge amount of empirical evidence that is clearly nowhere to be seen.

    I guess that in Buddha’s time and many centuries afterwards these notions of “mind”, “soul”, “energy” as separate from the material reality were perfectly natural. Not only people then (like now) needed to find explanations to their existence but these ideas were not too departed from their knowledge and everyday experience. I doubt I would have been an atheist in those times. Sadly perhaps, we now know a lot more about the universe where we live but the time for mythical explanations of reality is gone.

    •ï¿½Replies: @AltanBakshi
    @Mikel


    Buddha not showing any evidence of having understood scientific concepts that we now teach our children in elementary school and saying that there must have been some genetic modification that allowed our species (or previous ones) to achieve Buddhist enlightenment are quite different arguments. But they do have in common that they insist in analyzing religious claims from a cold rational perspective, if that’s what you mean.
    �
    .
    What religious or mythological there is in claiming that beings crave things, desire happiness, and try to avoid or avert uncomfortable states of being, or that there exists ignorance regarding the nature of subjective phenomena? Lets take a junkie and a doctor, its a totally subjective question to say whose more happy, right? But its clear that a doctor has less ignorance regarding the nature of phenomena, for he understood that trough hard work even unpleasant things can become sources of happiness, unlike the junkie who constantly escapes to momentarily happiness that is given by drugs. But both the doctor and junkie are driven by pursuit of happiness. There isnt anything inherently religious or mythological in questions like these, and such questions form the basis of our religion and the quest for enlightenment.

    I am aware of the problem of defining what an observer is in quantum mechanics. But this is a very deep scientific issue at the very edge of our ability to understand reality. My understanding is that physicists don’t really know what constitutes an observation but they do know through repeated experiments that our observation makes wave functions collapse.

    Other than that, there is no scientific dispute about the fact that anything of what we call mental activities takes place through our brains.

    �
    I dont know anything about quantum mechanics, but the very crux of our debate is the Buddhist claim that there is a rebirth or continuum of mental aggregates. I am not claiming that science supports us, but similarly there is not strong enough scientific case that denies such possibility, and I really mean it. How we see reality is inherently subjective, there is no objective reality accessible to us, or do you claim otherwise?

    Its little bit hard to argue with you, because I am not sure of your position, do you claim that mind is purely product of materialist-chemical interaction, or do you claim that we dont know surely but only science can give us, not maybe definite, but at least somehow trustworthy answers?

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_theories_of_consciousness
    Even reading just this link you will see that there are serious proponents of such theories as there are opponents, because Im not scientist I cant say who is right and it seems to me that even scientists cant say.

    I have a question for you, if there are two brothers who have a similar upbringing and background, why then another brother can end up in a totally different way after hearing just couple kind words from some wise person? You cant possibly deny that people are not capable of changing by hearing some words put together, if those words are inspirational or engaging? If change is possible in such way, then its clear that there is a subjective and qualitative element in our lives, which cant be reduced into a purely materialistic model. If you claim otherwise then you are making claims that science is not making, or if you claim that science will one day know that the materialist model is correct, then thats not science, but claiming that your subjective unvalified and untested hypothesis regarding the workings of the mind is correct.

    By the way I really know from my life such case of two brothers, another one is a physician and another one was an ex biker criminal who is now dead, because he committed a suicide.

    Hmm if purely materialist explanation of our mind is true, then in such situation I think that there would be no free will, all in our mind would strictly follow electro chemical causal processes, in such situation world would be purely deterministic, and our discussion would be more or less pointless, because we couldnt choose what to believe, but everything in our mind is just purely produced by genes and chemical processes.

    Happily there is legit and robust scientific evidence that meditation and Buddhist practices can change our brain to better.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/inspired-life/wp/2015/05/26/harvard-neuroscientist-meditation-not-only-reduces-stress-it-literally-changes-your-brain/?outputType=amp

    "Mindfulness meditation increased thickness in the prefrontal cortex and parietal lobes, both linked to attention control, while compassion-based meditation showed increases in the limbic system, which processes emotions, and the anterior insula, which helps bring emotions into conscious awareness."
    https://www.newscientist.com/article/2149489-different-meditation-types-train-distinct-parts-of-your-brain/

    So its clear even from a scientific viewpoint that our practices do bring beneficial results. Mindfulness or Vipassana is just one practice among many Buddhist meditation practices. Remember that Buddha never demanded anyone to believe anything, not at all, he just found a path to true happiness, but how can we know if his words are true? The Buddha has answer for that, he said that come and test my path, and you can yourself see if there are results or not, and decide if you want to go further on that path.

    I myself have been a content on that path, yes there are often problems and obstacles, but such is life, still better to move on some direction than to stay in present state that is clearly not optimal.

    One funny( or is it?) fact:
    I literally cant find cases when Buddhists have persecuted or harassed atheists, but there are thousands of cases when atheists have killed and slaughtered Buddhists, only in Soviet Buryatia of the 1930s, Soviet state atheism led to killing of 18 000 Buryat Buddhist monks. In those times there were only 400 000 buryats in whole Russia. Same happened in Mongolia, Cambodia, Tibet and China. There are some intellectually dishonest atheist individuals who claim that communists were not somehow atheistic, but they were, there is even now a rule in China that only atheists can become members of the communist party of China.
    http://asiarussia.ru/articles/13979/

    Replies: @Mikel
  • @blatnoi
    @Dmitry

    Well, after living there for five years, I noticed how hard it was for Israelis to start building transit or new rail lines without fuckups, unlike the Chinese. They talked about a rail-line, any rail line at all, not even fast rail, to Eilat the entire time I was there. I suppose that if the Chinese are building it, then like the first video mentions, having it be operational in 2021 (!), is a distinct possibility.

    [as an aside, I didn't know you could understand Hebrew since somewhere you mentioned you lived there for a very short time; however, I suppose it's an easy language and after being gone for a long time and not practicing, I still understood 80-90% of the video]

    The canal in Eilat is a good idea, but they would have to destroy a hotel or two, and get rid of the Eilat airport (although I think that's already done maybe). Eilat doesn't have fresh water and the climate is harsh, but that hasn't really deterred Saudi Arabia so I suppose it's possible from a technical perspective.

    I never thought it was possible for other reasons at the time because Eilat is too close to Egypt and Jordan, and those are Sunni Arabs with unstable demographics who hate Jews and can be radicalized by ISIS, but that threat has pretty much receded by 2018. At the time ISIS in the Sinai was pretty active. And they feel more confident now since the Jews now have more children than Palestinians and Trump helped with all those peace deals with the Arab dictatorships. I think the Ayatollahs made a bad mistake in deciding to be enemies of Israel, although they did pretty well in other places. They could have had a good ally and an alliance of minorities in the Middle East and the place would have been very different today, with Iran a much stronger player with completely different alliances. Israel would be weaker and still surrounded by more belligerent enemies on all sides though, I think.

    Replies: @Dmitry

    you could understand Hebrew

    I have completed most of the Duolingo levels now for Hebrew. Although to be honest, my brain still finds it easier to understand languages I’ve never even studied like Italian.

    and get rid of the Eilat airport (although I think that’s already done maybe)

    Yes they removed the airport from Eilat, and they constructed a new airport in the desert (on a border with Jordan).

    They had to build one of the highest fences, to protect the new airport from potential missiles fired, as it’s directly on the border with Jordan, and you could probably shoot down planes from the desert on the other side of the border. I’d wonder how safe that location really is.

    Video Link

    fast rail, to Eilat the entire time I was there.

    First proposal for this train was in 2012. The approval to begin (planning) for the first section was passed in June 2020. https://www.railjournal.com/infrastructure/first-section-of-israels-eilat-line-approved/

    So it surely won’t be completed for years (unless China really helps them).

    However, train from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem has opened finally (after apparently18 years of planning and construction – they build a lot of bridges and tunnels, but it was performed before China began investing in Israel).


    Video Link

    •ï¿½Replies: @Mikel
    @Dmitry


    my brain still finds it easier to understand languages I’ve never even studied like Italian.
    �
    I can relate to that. The first couple of summers I spent in London during my early teens I probably learned more Italian than English, being all the time sorrunded by noisy Italians of my age.

    There is something musical and contagious about the Italian language (or the people who speak it, I'm not sure).
  • @Dmitry
    @blatnoi


    Haifa port extension.
    �
    It's not an extension of Haifa port. It is a new port being constructed on the other side of Haifa's bay, a kilometre in the sea. China will operate only the new port, while the old port will be in competition with the Chinese operated port.

    they managed to actually build something and that fast.

    �
    There's also a new port being constructed kilometres North of Ashdod. New port will be operated by China, while the old port of Ashdod continues with Israeli managers.

    New port near Ashdod is being built on an artificial island in the sea, like for Haifa. So in both cases the Chinese operated ports will quite physically far away from Israeli operated ports.

    Here in the video shows both the new port being constructed outside Ashdod (at 0:24) and the port being built new Haifa (at 0:40)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nHsxM_JVUDo

    place in Eilat really, to set up the required infrastructure
    �
    The plan is using a canal, that would allow cargo to transferred onto trains, which will move it from Eilat to Ashdod.

    Even aside from China's "Belt and Road Initiative" - because Israel is making peace with Arab world, there will be apparently high demand for Eilat port. For example oil cargo will now move between from United Arab Emirates to Israel.

    Probably such a project is far too expensive for Israel to finance, so it's question the extent China would finance construction.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpqQ2FX7pWQ

    Replies: @blatnoi

    Well, after living there for five years, I noticed how hard it was for Israelis to start building transit or new rail lines without fuckups, unlike the Chinese. They talked about a rail-line, any rail line at all, not even fast rail, to Eilat the entire time I was there. I suppose that if the Chinese are building it, then like the first video mentions, having it be operational in 2021 (!), is a distinct possibility.

    [as an aside, I didn’t know you could understand Hebrew since somewhere you mentioned you lived there for a very short time; however, I suppose it’s an easy language and after being gone for a long time and not practicing, I still understood 80-90% of the video]

    The canal in Eilat is a good idea, but they would have to destroy a hotel or two, and get rid of the Eilat airport (although I think that’s already done maybe). Eilat doesn’t have fresh water and the climate is harsh, but that hasn’t really deterred Saudi Arabia so I suppose it’s possible from a technical perspective.

    I never thought it was possible for other reasons at the time because Eilat is too close to Egypt and Jordan, and those are Sunni Arabs with unstable demographics who hate Jews and can be radicalized by ISIS, but that threat has pretty much receded by 2018. At the time ISIS in the Sinai was pretty active. And they feel more confident now since the Jews now have more children than Palestinians and Trump helped with all those peace deals with the Arab dictatorships. I think the Ayatollahs made a bad mistake in deciding to be enemies of Israel, although they did pretty well in other places. They could have had a good ally and an alliance of minorities in the Middle East and the place would have been very different today, with Iran a much stronger player with completely different alliances. Israel would be weaker and still surrounded by more belligerent enemies on all sides though, I think.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Dmitry
    @blatnoi


    you could understand Hebrew
    �
    I have completed most of the Duolingo levels now for Hebrew. Although to be honest, my brain still finds it easier to understand languages I've never even studied like Italian.

    and get rid of the Eilat airport (although I think that’s already done maybe)

    �
    Yes they removed the airport from Eilat, and they constructed a new airport in the desert (on a border with Jordan).

    They had to build one of the highest fences, to protect the new airport from potential missiles fired, as it's directly on the border with Jordan, and you could probably shoot down planes from the desert on the other side of the border. I'd wonder how safe that location really is.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrAG3rPJ71M

    fast rail, to Eilat the entire time I was there.

    �
    First proposal for this train was in 2012. The approval to begin (planning) for the first section was passed in June 2020. https://www.railjournal.com/infrastructure/first-section-of-israels-eilat-line-approved/

    So it surely won't be completed for years (unless China really helps them).

    However, train from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem has opened finally (after apparently18 years of planning and construction - they build a lot of bridges and tunnels, but it was performed before China began investing in Israel).

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHuas5hNsZc

    Replies: @Mikel
  • @blatnoi
    @Dmitry

    I think it's only 2 or 3 years old. The people in charge on the Technion side are mostly not engineers I believe, but general sciences, and the plan is maybe to make it into a research university in all fields, but they decided to start with engineering degrees to get a large number of students at the beginning and to build up a reputation first.

    I heard that there were plans to create it about the time I was interviewing for a job at the Technion (I didn't get it...), so I've been checking up on its progress every once in a while, looking at open positions just in case I need a new job. I figure that if I got to the final stage at the Technion proper, they would probably hire me at this place, but currently it would be a step down.

    Of course there is big opposition to China-Israel cooperation from the US, since the latter was planning to use Israel as a research hub for military technologies. If the Chinese have a big presence and spying capacity, then it's not that good of a research hub. Plus the Chinese could get up to speed with desalination technology, etc... It's in Israel's interests to increase cooperation with China but make it so that the US doesn't notice it too much. It appears to me that the Chinese don't have the baggage of Christianity or Islam, and they respect Jews for being successful in science and money things (the giant money gift by the Chinese billionaire to the Technion is perhaps the most glaring example), so in the long term, it would make sense for a strong Israel to align with a friendly, authoritarian government far away.

    Thanks for the info on the Haifa port extension. It's amazing that they managed to actually build something and that fast. Places can change quite a bit when you're not there. The cargo train idea I agree is pretty dubious. There is also not enough place in Eilat really, to set up the required infrastructure, without destroying the environment and the tourism.

    Replies: @Dmitry

    Haifa port extension.

    It’s not an extension of Haifa port. It is a new port being constructed on the other side of Haifa’s bay, a kilometre in the sea. China will operate only the new port, while the old port will be in competition with the Chinese operated port.

    they managed to actually build something and that fast.

    There’s also a new port being constructed kilometres North of Ashdod. New port will be operated by China, while the old port of Ashdod continues with Israeli managers.

    New port near Ashdod is being built on an artificial island in the sea, like for Haifa. So in both cases the Chinese operated ports will quite physically far away from Israeli operated ports.

    Here in the video shows both the new port being constructed outside Ashdod (at 0:24) and the port being built new Haifa (at 0:40)

    Video Link

    place in Eilat really, to set up the required infrastructure

    The plan is using a canal, that would allow cargo to transferred onto trains, which will move it from Eilat to Ashdod.

    Even aside from China’s “Belt and Road Initiative” – because Israel is making peace with Arab world, there will be apparently high demand for Eilat port. For example oil cargo will now move between from United Arab Emirates to Israel.

    Probably such a project is far too expensive for Israel to finance, so it’s question the extent China would finance construction.

    Video Link

    •ï¿½Replies: @blatnoi
    @Dmitry

    Well, after living there for five years, I noticed how hard it was for Israelis to start building transit or new rail lines without fuckups, unlike the Chinese. They talked about a rail-line, any rail line at all, not even fast rail, to Eilat the entire time I was there. I suppose that if the Chinese are building it, then like the first video mentions, having it be operational in 2021 (!), is a distinct possibility.

    [as an aside, I didn't know you could understand Hebrew since somewhere you mentioned you lived there for a very short time; however, I suppose it's an easy language and after being gone for a long time and not practicing, I still understood 80-90% of the video]

    The canal in Eilat is a good idea, but they would have to destroy a hotel or two, and get rid of the Eilat airport (although I think that's already done maybe). Eilat doesn't have fresh water and the climate is harsh, but that hasn't really deterred Saudi Arabia so I suppose it's possible from a technical perspective.

    I never thought it was possible for other reasons at the time because Eilat is too close to Egypt and Jordan, and those are Sunni Arabs with unstable demographics who hate Jews and can be radicalized by ISIS, but that threat has pretty much receded by 2018. At the time ISIS in the Sinai was pretty active. And they feel more confident now since the Jews now have more children than Palestinians and Trump helped with all those peace deals with the Arab dictatorships. I think the Ayatollahs made a bad mistake in deciding to be enemies of Israel, although they did pretty well in other places. They could have had a good ally and an alliance of minorities in the Middle East and the place would have been very different today, with Iran a much stronger player with completely different alliances. Israel would be weaker and still surrounded by more belligerent enemies on all sides though, I think.

    Replies: @Dmitry
  • @Mikel
    @Thulean Friend


    There’s something magical about cities built on archipelagos.

    �
    There's something magical about the grandiose landscapes of the American West.

    Here pioneers and Pony Express riders once risked being scalped by Shoshone raiders but now you can enjoy the serenity of virgin nature for hours on end from the comfort of a spacious and powerful SUV:

    https://i.imgur.com/VUV8ZEU.jpg

    Replies: @AltanBakshi

    Sorry Mikel that I called you boring, because you are not, but sometimes you are a little bit too repetitive with your arguments.

    Last time I didnt have time nor patience to reply to your comment in a way that it deserved, for our Dharma is not very simple thing to explain to those who are not part of our weltanschauung/merkwelt, its like explaining chemistry to some one who had never heard about periodic table or structural formulas of molecules. Then there is my limited capability to express myself properly in English. I do understand almost everything that is written in that language, but I often have a lack of finesse when explaining more delicate and nuanced details of our philosophy. I must confess that I have had very little formal education in English language.

    [MORE]

    There is no scientifically proven theory of anything. Proofs belong to the realm of mathematics or logic, not to natural sciences that only deal with evidences in favor of one theory until it is empirically falsified.

    So the most you can hope for is that some scientific theory will provisionally be consistent with whatever religious/mythical ideas your religious group came up with to explain things that were then poorly understood.

    I very well know that there is no guaranteed truth in natural sciences, but as I explained you previously, there is no consensus at all in the scientific community what mind is and how does it arise, all purely materialist models of consciousness cant explain how consciousness arises from non conscious matter. You can google yourself and see how lost the scientists are with this problem, they cant even agree what consciousness is. Some links that I found by googling:
    https://uh.edu/~garson/IMNotes5.htm
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27498903/

    But in fact, that everything we call mind is just the result of our brain activity is not disputed nowadays. We know this with a huge amount of certainty because if we injure our brains we damage our mental abilities. And if we die, there ceases to be any mental activity detectable anywhere from the dead person. Brains stop functioning after they stop receiving blood and any manifestation of their activity therefore stops as well.

    Well, this is quite good argument, and I would even myself use it against Buddhist schools that are purely Idealistic. Yes, I should have explained to you previously that there are different Buddhist schools of philosophy, some are idealistic and believe that mind is the basis for all, some are atomist, and even believe that our consciousness arises when particles are in correct configuration and our suffering arises when we become attached to the illusory and non persistent forms made by the interaction of the atoms, and our sense of self is just by product of such interaction. So such Buddhism is somewhat materialistic.
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhist_atomism
    But I am myself a follower of the Madhyamaka or the Middle Way school of Buddhist philosophy, and we deny the view that mind is not dependent on matter, as we also deny that matter has independent existence from the mind, or maybe I should say that we cant access or define objectively what some particular matter/object is. There is always mental designation inputed by our mind. Every moment and everything is product of various causal relations, lets take as example something like some random rock on the forest, for some creature the rock can be totally meaningless, for some other it can be valuable building material for tools or buildings, or maybe even source of ores, or even inspiration for art, but is the rock something independently, does it have its own identity that is not dependent on perceiver? Clearly how creatures see the rock is dependent on numerous factors, some are more constructive in a literal sense and some more pointless. Then if there is a reason for us to perceive something in someway and if that reason is dependent on various causal factors, then it must be possible for us to change the factors and by changing the factors our perception of rock changes profoundly. If something like rock can have various meanings depending on perceiver, and how the perceiver mentally designates something, then various problems of our life can be mentally designated in a different way. Yes this is one problem with a purely materialistic worldview, if our mind is product of matter in some configuration, why then creatures react in different ways to same impulses, some hate pain and then there are people who are masochistic, do they have a physical problems in brain, have they detected that masochists have different brains, is there a structural difference between brains of a gay or a hetero man, or between an atheist and a Christian? And even if there is, are those differences results of different ways to believe and interact with the world or were they just “born in such way,” as some liberal faggots love to claim.

    Here is by the way interesting article regarding the brains, yes clearly mind needs brains to exist, but still things are not as simple as you possibly imply.
    https://www.businessinsider.com/the-man-who-lived-a-normal-life-with-almost-no-brain-2015-10?amp&r=US&IR=T
    And remember what I earlier posted to you about electro magnetic fields and the workings of our brains, there is empirical evidence that there some kind of field of energy in our brains, and changes in that field do change our consciousness, also electro magnetic fields dont just disappear into nothingness.

    About the different Buddhist schools, I should have explained you previously that we have numerous competing schools of Buddhism, that debate about how we can attain the enlightenment, or which way is the quickest etc, there is quite much variation between our schools, but we all agree on some basic points, and have very good relations with each other. After all Buddha very much emphasized how important is to test his teachings, just as one tests the quality of gold(our monks just love to repeat that),and even taught for different peoples in different ways.

    Yes, I would assume that you don’t care much about people being atheists. There are so many (and in so increasing numbers) of us. Your life would be quite miserable if you did.

    Its like you want that atheists would be a problem for us? Yes they were a huge problem for us in the form of Communist state atheism, but as long as they dont persecute us we really dont have any problems with them, and historically we did have a pleasant co existence with them in ancient times.

    The only Buddhists I have ever met (one of them a very good friend of mine) were of the Western/hippie type and I couldn’t take them too seriously.

    My knowledge and level of practice are very rudimentary and basic in relation to Geshes or graduated monks of our school, and Im quite lazy Buddhist, when I was a teen I was more of a cultural Buddhist but philosophically atheist materialist. Heck its not a long time ago when I started to do daily practice, and I still try to cut it short. Mikel in Buddhism serious practitioners are only those who have taken some kind of vows, lay or monastic.

    Hmm I should still explain to you one thing about the Dharma, because clearly you have some confusion regarding the question of what Buddhahood or enlightenment is and what is psychological or mental the basis for such state.

    The poison of craving

    Think about fly, fly craves something, it craves for food, it has this constant craving, it needs food, it is only happy when it will get food. It desires to be happy in its own way, right? It tries to avoid unpleasant sensations, like ants or swatting, right? So it can be said that it has somekind of rudimentary consciousness, very simple, nothing too sophisticated, right? It can even discern between nice and not nice feelings, so it has somekind of capability to make judgments between mental objects, it clearly has somekind of mental designation for them. This Mikel is the very basis of Buddhahood! Fly cant analyse its mental patterns, but we humans can and with a hard work we can step by step create sources of more and more stable and permanent happiness, than just eating or sex.

    The poison of ignorance

    So we suffer because there are nice things and sensations that we want, but they are not permanent, and then there are things that we dont enjoy, that we try to avoid. But its not only that, we also suffer because we think that non permanent and non fixed phenomena can be basis for a real happiness, that is the poison of craving. We crave, we constantly crave something, but even though we fulfill our desires there is always something lacking, we are never truly content. Sex is an excellent example of this. First you go sometimes to a hooker, then its not enough and you need couple of them and some coke, and one day even thats not enough etc… And so the hunger grows, but why it is so? Why some are more content with things and some more greedy? Its because of ignorance, because we have an ignorant view of some phenomena, that we believe that they are true sources of happiness and input erroneous qualities into them, or mentally designate them in such way that leads to suffering. The fly is too much prisoner of its material or fixed form, so it cant differentiate between sources of happiness, therefore it cant become enlightened as long as its a fly.

    The poison of aversion

    Then there are things that we hate, that are uncomfortable, this is quite self explanatory for all people, but why it is so? Because we believe that some phenomena have more or less a permanently unpleasant effect, so we try our best in avoiding them, consciously or instinctively. But such belief arises from mistaken view that phenomenas are fixed, or that we have something fixed in us that denies us to be happy in some other ways that we imagine.

    So all these three poisons are dependent on various causal factors and how we perceive the reality, they are not fixed nor permanent, but as long as we have these three regarding internal or external phenomena, as long we will not be enlightened. These are the three poisons that give birth to Samsara according to the Buddha. Some schools believe that after extinction of these three poisons ones consciousness is severed from this reality, and one cant even say what the world is for such beings who have undergone such transformation. This is the view of Theravadins, that we of Mahayana disparagingly call as followers of a Small Vehicle or Hinayana. But we of the Mahayana or pf the Great Vehicle believe that after the purification of our mind from the poisons we will see the world as it truly is, that our mind is fully liberated from all defilements, then we see all other beings in such undefiled state and will strive eternally to liberate all beings, which has no beginning has no ending, we will toil eternally for the salvation of all beings when we are Buddhas. That is the Aryan or Noble view of Mahayana. Also that is what we mean by talking that Buddhas dont have discriminating awareness, meaning that they lack aversion, craving and ignorance, or that all is empty for them, after all they have themselves empirically and intuitively understood that all phenomenas are not fixed, and that they dont have their own nature independent of perceiver, their true nature is non nature and so on. But oh well that is another and very complicated but deeply related topic.

    Oh well my travel was pleasantly spend by writing this barebones explanation of some elementary Buddhist facts to you. I hope that there arent too many typos.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Mikel
    @AltanBakshi

    Your English looks surprisingly good to me, considering that you had little formal education in English language.

    I can think of authors that have posted on this site and still show a much more rudimentary English than yours after having lived in the US for many years. In my view anyway, I am not a native English speaker myself.

    sometimes you are a little bit too repetitive with your arguments
    �
    I can bore to death anyone talking about natural landscapes, mountains, weather and climate but I am not aware of having used repetitive arguments with you.

    Buddha not showing any evidence of having understood scientific concepts that we now teach our children in elementary school and saying that there must have been some genetic modification that allowed our species (or previous ones) to achieve Buddhist enlightenment are quite different arguments. But they do have in common that they insist in analyzing religious claims from a cold rational perspective, if that's what you mean.

    Maybe it's my fault but I cannot evaluate any sort of claims in any other way if I want to make sense of what I read.

    there is no consensus at all in the scientific community what mind is and how does it arise, all purely materialist models of consciousness cant explain how consciousness arises from non conscious matter.
    �
    No, sorry, I don't agree with that and I don't find the links you have provided to the work of a philosopher and a musical therapist very helpful.

    I am aware of the problem of defining what an observer is in quantum mechanics. But this is a very deep scientific issue at the very edge of our ability to understand reality. My understanding is that physicists don't really know what constitutes an observation but they do know through repeated experiments that our observation makes wave functions collapse.

    Other than that, there is no scientific dispute about the fact that anything of what we call mental activities takes place through our brains.

    As for quantum mechanics, I think that the fact that we are unable to fully understand nature and that only some very privileged individuals are able to grasp the most advanced subjects is very unsurprising. We are just an animal species with limited brain capabilities. If we were the only species capable of understanding everything, that would be truly suggestive of some God-like phenomenon, not the other way around.

    there is empirical evidence that there some kind of field of energy in our brains, and changes in that field do change our consciousness, also electro magnetic fields dont just disappear into nothingness.
    �
    Quite honestly, I think that citing this in support of any transcendental explanation of our existence is grasping at straws.

    Chemical and very weak electric reactions occur inside the brains of any animal species. I'm not sure what exactly happens to the very last electric activity in the human brain before an individual dies. My guess is that it just vanishes as it performs the duty of supplying energy for neuronal processes and that is that.

    To be credible, the idea that these weak electric currents somehow survive after a homo sapiens dies and transform him into another living creature requires a huge amount of empirical evidence that is clearly nowhere to be seen.

    I guess that in Buddha's time and many centuries afterwards these notions of "mind", "soul", "energy" as separate from the material reality were perfectly natural. Not only people then (like now) needed to find explanations to their existence but these ideas were not too departed from their knowledge and everyday experience. I doubt I would have been an atheist in those times. Sadly perhaps, we now know a lot more about the universe where we live but the time for mythical explanations of reality is gone.

    Replies: @AltanBakshi
  • sher singh says:
    @AltanBakshi
    @Europe Europa

    I dont know much about Celtic nationalism, but arent nationalist or racially minded English already out as a "cultural/political force," havent they been out for a sometime already?

    Its odd when people always forget that its not the French who first murdered their king, but the English.

    Can there even be a worse crime or transgression committed by the people than that of regicide? Theres a deicide...

    Replies: @sher singh

    “Sovereignty resided in the body politic of the Khalsa Sikh.â€

    The root word of ‘khalsa’ can be translated as ‘purified’, but its meaning in a Sikh context is also understandable by looking at its application. It is important to understand what one is purified of.

    [MORE]

    In the Mughal political order, the word khalsa was used to mark out land which was directly owned by the Emperor, that is which had no intermediary vassals. In the Sikh social structure, which since its inception was created to subvert Mughal claims of legitimate authority as rulers of their subjects – a Sikh owed allegiance not to the Mughal Emperor, who was identified as the false padishah, but to the one true ‘ruler’, the sacha padishah, which was, the infinite divine, or Akal Purakh, by whose true laws (hukum) the universe was ordered (hukum hovey aakar).

    The use of khalsa for liberated Sikhs was therefore an etymological subversion of the Mughal Imperial structure,and claims to legitimacy. The Khalsa Sikh owed allegiance to the sacha padishah, and was therefore ‘khalas’ purified and liberated from the chains of unjust, anti-dharmic political authority. There is also perhaps an intentional territorial aspect to this meaning of khalsa. Was the Khalsa Sikh ‘created’ to make the territory controlled by the false emperor truly ‘khalas’ by deposing him, and destroying the edifice of unjust rule imposed by kings who were butchers (rajey kasai) and bring in an era of just rule (dharam raj) in a land where dharam had taken wings and disappeared (dharam pankh kar uddarya)?

    The Guru is, in a sense, a translator of the hukum of infinite into human language,

    So, as, one does not need to travel to holy places to purify one’s soul, for, by traveling across the gulf of ignorance, by contemplating on the Gurus’s shabad, as the knowledge of Oneness becomes manifest in the mind, the mind itself becomes self-capable of redeeming itself – tirath naava je tis bhava.

    From this follows an idea of self rule, or rule over the self, or swa-raja. From self rule over the mind, comes the self rule of the body, and when a community of such self-ruled minds and bodies come together, they create a body politic of the eternally free and unbound (cakravartini).

    https://sialmirzagoraya.substack.com/p/evolution-of-the-sikh-polity

    In a deeper sense then, God is not completely absent in the face of human suffering. Suffering is a forge, to make the ‘weak’ and the ‘helpless’ who looks for help from the outside, strong enough, to find strength within.

    https://sialmirzagoraya.substack.com/p/guru-nanaks-baburvani-a-sikh-theory

  • @dfordoom
    @mal


    SpaceX Starship did a belly flop. Despite blowing up later it is a significant progress.
    �
    A bit like the maiden voyage of the Titanic, which was mostly successful.

    Replies: @mal

    Well, nobody died in Starship case, but in a way you are correct. Titanic may have sank, but large ocean cruise liners continued to be built and operated and became a successful industry. You could get a cruise ticket fairly cheaply. Same will happen in space.

    •ï¿½Replies: @dfordoom
    @mal


    Well, nobody died in Starship case, but in a way you are correct. Titanic may have sank, but large ocean cruise liners continued to be built and operated and became a successful industry. You could get a cruise ticket fairly cheaply. Same will happen in space.
    �
    The difference is that ocean liners were actually useful. Manned spaceflight is not useful.

    Replies: @songbird
  • @Europe Europa
    @AltanBakshi

    Celtic nationalism is mostly a proxy to attack the English, it's no coincidence that 90% of Celtic nationalism is heavily allied with left wing/Marxist politics. It's to give further credence to the idea that the English are a race of brutal fascistic oppressors deserving of their fate of being wiped out.

    The leftist establishment will only back their hideously white culture and language insofar as it serves the agenda of destroying the English. Once the English are out of the way as a viable cultural/political force, and that day can't be far off, they will drop the Celts like a piece of trash. Celtic nationalists are precisely what Lenin would have termed "useful idiots".

    Replies: @AltanBakshi

    I dont know much about Celtic nationalism, but arent nationalist or racially minded English already out as a “cultural/political force,” havent they been out for a sometime already?

    Its odd when people always forget that its not the French who first murdered their king, but the English.

    Can there even be a worse crime or transgression committed by the people than that of regicide? Theres a deicide…

    •ï¿½Replies: @sher singh
    @AltanBakshi


    “Sovereignty resided in the body politic of the Khalsa Sikh.â€

    The root word of 'khalsa' can be translated as 'purified', but its meaning in a Sikh context is also understandable by looking at its application. It is important to understand what one is purified of.
    �

    In the Mughal political order, the word khalsa was used to mark out land which was directly owned by the Emperor, that is which had no intermediary vassals. In the Sikh social structure, which since its inception was created to subvert Mughal claims of legitimate authority as rulers of their subjects - a Sikh owed allegiance not to the Mughal Emperor, who was identified as the false padishah, but to the one true 'ruler', the sacha padishah, which was, the infinite divine, or Akal Purakh, by whose true laws (hukum) the universe was ordered (hukum hovey aakar).
    �

    The use of khalsa for liberated Sikhs was therefore an etymological subversion of the Mughal Imperial structure,and claims to legitimacy. The Khalsa Sikh owed allegiance to the sacha padishah, and was therefore 'khalas' purified and liberated from the chains of unjust, anti-dharmic political authority. There is also perhaps an intentional territorial aspect to this meaning of khalsa. Was the Khalsa Sikh 'created' to make the territory controlled by the false emperor truly 'khalas' by deposing him, and destroying the edifice of unjust rule imposed by kings who were butchers (rajey kasai) and bring in an era of just rule (dharam raj) in a land where dharam had taken wings and disappeared (dharam pankh kar uddarya)?
    �

    The Guru is, in a sense, a translator of the hukum of infinite into human language,
    �

    So, as, one does not need to travel to holy places to purify one's soul, for, by traveling across the gulf of ignorance, by contemplating on the Gurus's shabad, as the knowledge of Oneness becomes manifest in the mind, the mind itself becomes self-capable of redeeming itself - tirath naava je tis bhava.

    From this follows an idea of self rule, or rule over the self, or swa-raja. From self rule over the mind, comes the self rule of the body, and when a community of such self-ruled minds and bodies come together, they create a body politic of the eternally free and unbound (cakravartini).
    �
    https://sialmirzagoraya.substack.com/p/evolution-of-the-sikh-polity

    In a deeper sense then, God is not completely absent in the face of human suffering. Suffering is a forge, to make the ‘weak’ and the ‘helpless’ who looks for help from the outside, strong enough, to find strength within.
    �
    https://sialmirzagoraya.substack.com/p/guru-nanaks-baburvani-a-sikh-theory
  • @Dmitry
    @blatnoi

    Yes I noticed about that story more than a year ago. It's a kind of engineering school.
    https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1272023946297233

    -

    In terms of "Belt and Road Initiative", China is interested in the backup/alternative to Suez Canal via Israel, with the construction of an Eilat-Ashdod cargo train.

    This would be an alternative cargo route from East Asia to Europe
    https://i.imgur.com/RL5wugY.jpg


    However, apparently, trains cannot transport equivalent amount of cargo, and it would introduce an additional expensive reloading stage compared to a canal. So at best, it will be an alternative for a minority of cargo going through Suez Canal.

    -
    There's also some kind of US opposition to China's projects in Israel. For example, USA is trying to block China from buying the old port in Haifa.

    But there is already a new artificial island being constructed to give Haifa more cargo capacity.

    Since the northern Port of Haifa was inaugurated in 1933, preceding even the state’s foundation, it has served as the primary naval gateway for everything from waves of Jewish immigrants to container shipments.

    But officials are now pushing forward with a privatization plan meant to make it more competitive, right as Shanghai International Port Group Co. prepares to open an advanced harbor next year in the same city.

    Officials want to sell the older Haifa port for as much as 2 billion shekels ($586 million), but regardless of the final price, the first 1 billion shekels from any deal will go into upgrades like building a new deep-water platform.
    �
    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2020-08-04/supply-chains-latest-israel-s-top-port-is-for-sale

    Chinese government has already bought the new artificial island port next to Haifa. It looks like the artificial island port is being constructed a couple kilometres from Haifa.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kWJxjHZR3WA

    Replies: @Blinky Bill, @blatnoi

    I think it’s only 2 or 3 years old. The people in charge on the Technion side are mostly not engineers I believe, but general sciences, and the plan is maybe to make it into a research university in all fields, but they decided to start with engineering degrees to get a large number of students at the beginning and to build up a reputation first.

    I heard that there were plans to create it about the time I was interviewing for a job at the Technion (I didn’t get it…), so I’ve been checking up on its progress every once in a while, looking at open positions just in case I need a new job. I figure that if I got to the final stage at the Technion proper, they would probably hire me at this place, but currently it would be a step down.

    Of course there is big opposition to China-Israel cooperation from the US, since the latter was planning to use Israel as a research hub for military technologies. If the Chinese have a big presence and spying capacity, then it’s not that good of a research hub. Plus the Chinese could get up to speed with desalination technology, etc… It’s in Israel’s interests to increase cooperation with China but make it so that the US doesn’t notice it too much. It appears to me that the Chinese don’t have the baggage of Christianity or Islam, and they respect Jews for being successful in science and money things (the giant money gift by the Chinese billionaire to the Technion is perhaps the most glaring example), so in the long term, it would make sense for a strong Israel to align with a friendly, authoritarian government far away.

    Thanks for the info on the Haifa port extension. It’s amazing that they managed to actually build something and that fast. Places can change quite a bit when you’re not there. The cargo train idea I agree is pretty dubious. There is also not enough place in Eilat really, to set up the required infrastructure, without destroying the environment and the tourism.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Dmitry
    @blatnoi


    Haifa port extension.
    �
    It's not an extension of Haifa port. It is a new port being constructed on the other side of Haifa's bay, a kilometre in the sea. China will operate only the new port, while the old port will be in competition with the Chinese operated port.

    they managed to actually build something and that fast.

    �
    There's also a new port being constructed kilometres North of Ashdod. New port will be operated by China, while the old port of Ashdod continues with Israeli managers.

    New port near Ashdod is being built on an artificial island in the sea, like for Haifa. So in both cases the Chinese operated ports will quite physically far away from Israeli operated ports.

    Here in the video shows both the new port being constructed outside Ashdod (at 0:24) and the port being built new Haifa (at 0:40)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nHsxM_JVUDo

    place in Eilat really, to set up the required infrastructure
    �
    The plan is using a canal, that would allow cargo to transferred onto trains, which will move it from Eilat to Ashdod.

    Even aside from China's "Belt and Road Initiative" - because Israel is making peace with Arab world, there will be apparently high demand for Eilat port. For example oil cargo will now move between from United Arab Emirates to Israel.

    Probably such a project is far too expensive for Israel to finance, so it's question the extent China would finance construction.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpqQ2FX7pWQ

    Replies: @blatnoi
  • Mikel says:
    @Thulean Friend
    The city was beautiful this morning.

    https://i.imgur.com/FuxGClG.jpg

    Low-level photography outside is hard, especially during dusk, so the picture doesn't quite do it justice. There's something magical about cities built on archipelagos.

    Replies: @AltanBakshi, @A123, @Mikel

    There’s something magical about cities built on archipelagos.

    There’s something magical about the grandiose landscapes of the American West.

    Here pioneers and Pony Express riders once risked being scalped by Shoshone raiders but now you can enjoy the serenity of virgin nature for hours on end from the comfort of a spacious and powerful SUV:

    •ï¿½Thanks: AaronB
    •ï¿½Replies: @AltanBakshi
    @Mikel

    Sorry Mikel that I called you boring, because you are not, but sometimes you are a little bit too repetitive with your arguments.

    Last time I didnt have time nor patience to reply to your comment in a way that it deserved, for our Dharma is not very simple thing to explain to those who are not part of our weltanschauung/merkwelt, its like explaining chemistry to some one who had never heard about periodic table or structural formulas of molecules. Then there is my limited capability to express myself properly in English. I do understand almost everything that is written in that language, but I often have a lack of finesse when explaining more delicate and nuanced details of our philosophy. I must confess that I have had very little formal education in English language.

    There is no scientifically proven theory of anything. Proofs belong to the realm of mathematics or logic, not to natural sciences that only deal with evidences in favor of one theory until it is empirically falsified.

    So the most you can hope for is that some scientific theory will provisionally be consistent with whatever religious/mythical ideas your religious group came up with to explain things that were then poorly understood.
    �
    I very well know that there is no guaranteed truth in natural sciences, but as I explained you previously, there is no consensus at all in the scientific community what mind is and how does it arise, all purely materialist models of consciousness cant explain how consciousness arises from non conscious matter. You can google yourself and see how lost the scientists are with this problem, they cant even agree what consciousness is. Some links that I found by googling:
    https://uh.edu/~garson/IMNotes5.htm
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27498903/

    But in fact, that everything we call mind is just the result of our brain activity is not disputed nowadays. We know this with a huge amount of certainty because if we injure our brains we damage our mental abilities. And if we die, there ceases to be any mental activity detectable anywhere from the dead person. Brains stop functioning after they stop receiving blood and any manifestation of their activity therefore stops as well.
    �
    Well, this is quite good argument, and I would even myself use it against Buddhist schools that are purely Idealistic. Yes, I should have explained to you previously that there are different Buddhist schools of philosophy, some are idealistic and believe that mind is the basis for all, some are atomist, and even believe that our consciousness arises when particles are in correct configuration and our suffering arises when we become attached to the illusory and non persistent forms made by the interaction of the atoms, and our sense of self is just by product of such interaction. So such Buddhism is somewhat materialistic.
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhist_atomism
    But I am myself a follower of the Madhyamaka or the Middle Way school of Buddhist philosophy, and we deny the view that mind is not dependent on matter, as we also deny that matter has independent existence from the mind, or maybe I should say that we cant access or define objectively what some particular matter/object is. There is always mental designation inputed by our mind. Every moment and everything is product of various causal relations, lets take as example something like some random rock on the forest, for some creature the rock can be totally meaningless, for some other it can be valuable building material for tools or buildings, or maybe even source of ores, or even inspiration for art, but is the rock something independently, does it have its own identity that is not dependent on perceiver? Clearly how creatures see the rock is dependent on numerous factors, some are more constructive in a literal sense and some more pointless. Then if there is a reason for us to perceive something in someway and if that reason is dependent on various causal factors, then it must be possible for us to change the factors and by changing the factors our perception of rock changes profoundly. If something like rock can have various meanings depending on perceiver, and how the perceiver mentally designates something, then various problems of our life can be mentally designated in a different way. Yes this is one problem with a purely materialistic worldview, if our mind is product of matter in some configuration, why then creatures react in different ways to same impulses, some hate pain and then there are people who are masochistic, do they have a physical problems in brain, have they detected that masochists have different brains, is there a structural difference between brains of a gay or a hetero man, or between an atheist and a Christian? And even if there is, are those differences results of different ways to believe and interact with the world or were they just "born in such way," as some liberal faggots love to claim.

    Here is by the way interesting article regarding the brains, yes clearly mind needs brains to exist, but still things are not as simple as you possibly imply.
    https://www.businessinsider.com/the-man-who-lived-a-normal-life-with-almost-no-brain-2015-10?amp&r=US&IR=T
    And remember what I earlier posted to you about electro magnetic fields and the workings of our brains, there is empirical evidence that there some kind of field of energy in our brains, and changes in that field do change our consciousness, also electro magnetic fields dont just disappear into nothingness.

    About the different Buddhist schools, I should have explained you previously that we have numerous competing schools of Buddhism, that debate about how we can attain the enlightenment, or which way is the quickest etc, there is quite much variation between our schools, but we all agree on some basic points, and have very good relations with each other. After all Buddha very much emphasized how important is to test his teachings, just as one tests the quality of gold(our monks just love to repeat that),and even taught for different peoples in different ways.

    Yes, I would assume that you don’t care much about people being atheists. There are so many (and in so increasing numbers) of us. Your life would be quite miserable if you did.

    �
    Its like you want that atheists would be a problem for us? Yes they were a huge problem for us in the form of Communist state atheism, but as long as they dont persecute us we really dont have any problems with them, and historically we did have a pleasant co existence with them in ancient times.

    The only Buddhists I have ever met (one of them a very good friend of mine) were of the Western/hippie type and I couldn’t take them too seriously.
    �
    My knowledge and level of practice are very rudimentary and basic in relation to Geshes or graduated monks of our school, and Im quite lazy Buddhist, when I was a teen I was more of a cultural Buddhist but philosophically atheist materialist. Heck its not a long time ago when I started to do daily practice, and I still try to cut it short. Mikel in Buddhism serious practitioners are only those who have taken some kind of vows, lay or monastic.

    Hmm I should still explain to you one thing about the Dharma, because clearly you have some confusion regarding the question of what Buddhahood or enlightenment is and what is psychological or mental the basis for such state.


    The poison of craving

    Think about fly, fly craves something, it craves for food, it has this constant craving, it needs food, it is only happy when it will get food. It desires to be happy in its own way, right? It tries to avoid unpleasant sensations, like ants or swatting, right? So it can be said that it has somekind of rudimentary consciousness, very simple, nothing too sophisticated, right? It can even discern between nice and not nice feelings, so it has somekind of capability to make judgments between mental objects, it clearly has somekind of mental designation for them. This Mikel is the very basis of Buddhahood! Fly cant analyse its mental patterns, but we humans can and with a hard work we can step by step create sources of more and more stable and permanent happiness, than just eating or sex.

    The poison of ignorance

    So we suffer because there are nice things and sensations that we want, but they are not permanent, and then there are things that we dont enjoy, that we try to avoid. But its not only that, we also suffer because we think that non permanent and non fixed phenomena can be basis for a real happiness, that is the poison of craving. We crave, we constantly crave something, but even though we fulfill our desires there is always something lacking, we are never truly content. Sex is an excellent example of this. First you go sometimes to a hooker, then its not enough and you need couple of them and some coke, and one day even thats not enough etc... And so the hunger grows, but why it is so? Why some are more content with things and some more greedy? Its because of ignorance, because we have an ignorant view of some phenomena, that we believe that they are true sources of happiness and input erroneous qualities into them, or mentally designate them in such way that leads to suffering. The fly is too much prisoner of its material or fixed form, so it cant differentiate between sources of happiness, therefore it cant become enlightened as long as its a fly.

    The poison of aversion

    Then there are things that we hate, that are uncomfortable, this is quite self explanatory for all people, but why it is so? Because we believe that some phenomena have more or less a permanently unpleasant effect, so we try our best in avoiding them, consciously or instinctively. But such belief arises from mistaken view that phenomenas are fixed, or that we have something fixed in us that denies us to be happy in some other ways that we imagine.

    So all these three poisons are dependent on various causal factors and how we perceive the reality, they are not fixed nor permanent, but as long as we have these three regarding internal or external phenomena, as long we will not be enlightened. These are the three poisons that give birth to Samsara according to the Buddha. Some schools believe that after extinction of these three poisons ones consciousness is severed from this reality, and one cant even say what the world is for such beings who have undergone such transformation. This is the view of Theravadins, that we of Mahayana disparagingly call as followers of a Small Vehicle or Hinayana. But we of the Mahayana or pf the Great Vehicle believe that after the purification of our mind from the poisons we will see the world as it truly is, that our mind is fully liberated from all defilements, then we see all other beings in such undefiled state and will strive eternally to liberate all beings, which has no beginning has no ending, we will toil eternally for the salvation of all beings when we are Buddhas. That is the Aryan or Noble view of Mahayana. Also that is what we mean by talking that Buddhas dont have discriminating awareness, meaning that they lack aversion, craving and ignorance, or that all is empty for them, after all they have themselves empirically and intuitively understood that all phenomenas are not fixed, and that they dont have their own nature independent of perceiver, their true nature is non nature and so on. But oh well that is another and very complicated but deeply related topic.

    Oh well my travel was pleasantly spend by writing this barebones explanation of some elementary Buddhist facts to you. I hope that there arent too many typos.

    Replies: @Mikel
  • @mal
    SpaceX Starship did a belly flop. Despite blowing up later it is a significant progress.

    Starship is going to be like Portuguese Caravel in the early 15th century. The significance of this is huge, it will reshape the world.

    Replies: @Europe Europa, @dfordoom

    SpaceX Starship did a belly flop. Despite blowing up later it is a significant progress.

    A bit like the maiden voyage of the Titanic, which was mostly successful.

    •ï¿½Replies: @mal
    @dfordoom

    Well, nobody died in Starship case, but in a way you are correct. Titanic may have sank, but large ocean cruise liners continued to be built and operated and became a successful industry. You could get a cruise ticket fairly cheaply. Same will happen in space.

    Replies: @dfordoom
  • @Dmitry
    @blatnoi

    Yes I noticed about that story more than a year ago. It's a kind of engineering school.
    https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1272023946297233

    -

    In terms of "Belt and Road Initiative", China is interested in the backup/alternative to Suez Canal via Israel, with the construction of an Eilat-Ashdod cargo train.

    This would be an alternative cargo route from East Asia to Europe
    https://i.imgur.com/RL5wugY.jpg


    However, apparently, trains cannot transport equivalent amount of cargo, and it would introduce an additional expensive reloading stage compared to a canal. So at best, it will be an alternative for a minority of cargo going through Suez Canal.

    -
    There's also some kind of US opposition to China's projects in Israel. For example, USA is trying to block China from buying the old port in Haifa.

    But there is already a new artificial island being constructed to give Haifa more cargo capacity.

    Since the northern Port of Haifa was inaugurated in 1933, preceding even the state’s foundation, it has served as the primary naval gateway for everything from waves of Jewish immigrants to container shipments.

    But officials are now pushing forward with a privatization plan meant to make it more competitive, right as Shanghai International Port Group Co. prepares to open an advanced harbor next year in the same city.

    Officials want to sell the older Haifa port for as much as 2 billion shekels ($586 million), but regardless of the final price, the first 1 billion shekels from any deal will go into upgrades like building a new deep-water platform.
    �
    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2020-08-04/supply-chains-latest-israel-s-top-port-is-for-sale

    Chinese government has already bought the new artificial island port next to Haifa. It looks like the artificial island port is being constructed a couple kilometres from Haifa.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kWJxjHZR3WA

    Replies: @Blinky Bill, @blatnoi

    sino-israel.org/media/

  • Shifting manufacturing to India won’t be a simple task.

    Taiwanese IPhone Manufacturer’s India factory.

    Video Link


    Video Link

    •ï¿½LOL: TheTotallyAnonymous
  • @blatnoi
    @Dmitry

    And on the other side, who wouldn't want a cushy research job in sunny Shantou in this new Israeli university? A billionaire from Guangdong gave a whole bunch of money to the Technion on the condition they open up a branch in his hometown. It may have Chinese government support as well, I'm not sure.

    https://www.gtiit.edu.cn/en/index.aspx

    Though, when I was looking for work last it was rather new and not that well built up yet. It's still fairly small actually, and it's full of Israelis so it could be problematic from a workplace politics perspective. For me an ideal mix would be 20% Israelis and 80% normals.

    From their 'About' page:

    "GTIIT will be a state-of-the-art university dedicated to innovative research, environmental conservation, and social prosperity.

    The university will advance Guangdong province, the People's Republic of China, the State of Israel and all humanity.

    A brainchild of Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Guangdong Technion - Israel Institute of Technology will become a leading science and technology research university by leveraging the power of entrepreneurship and innovation with rich China culture.

    Guangdong Technion - Israel Institute of Technology will focus on creating pioneering leaders and researchers, through close ties with local industry and topnotch graduate-level, masters, doctoral and postdoctoral level programs."

    Replies: @Dmitry, @Dmitry

    It may have Chinese government support as well, I’m not sure.

    It is definitely a Chinese government project (for training young engineers with an Israeli designed syllabus). China-Israel projects seem to have only a character of “top down”, or operating through the Chinese government.

    Expensive looking campus buildings. Atmosphere of students – to study engineering with a lot of patriotism?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oY3nKAK1SsA

  • @blatnoi
    @Dmitry

    And on the other side, who wouldn't want a cushy research job in sunny Shantou in this new Israeli university? A billionaire from Guangdong gave a whole bunch of money to the Technion on the condition they open up a branch in his hometown. It may have Chinese government support as well, I'm not sure.

    https://www.gtiit.edu.cn/en/index.aspx

    Though, when I was looking for work last it was rather new and not that well built up yet. It's still fairly small actually, and it's full of Israelis so it could be problematic from a workplace politics perspective. For me an ideal mix would be 20% Israelis and 80% normals.

    From their 'About' page:

    "GTIIT will be a state-of-the-art university dedicated to innovative research, environmental conservation, and social prosperity.

    The university will advance Guangdong province, the People's Republic of China, the State of Israel and all humanity.

    A brainchild of Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Guangdong Technion - Israel Institute of Technology will become a leading science and technology research university by leveraging the power of entrepreneurship and innovation with rich China culture.

    Guangdong Technion - Israel Institute of Technology will focus on creating pioneering leaders and researchers, through close ties with local industry and topnotch graduate-level, masters, doctoral and postdoctoral level programs."

    Replies: @Dmitry, @Dmitry

    Yes I noticed about that story more than a year ago. It’s a kind of engineering school.
    https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1272023946297233

    In terms of “Belt and Road Initiative”, China is interested in the backup/alternative to Suez Canal via Israel, with the construction of an Eilat-Ashdod cargo train.

    This would be an alternative cargo route from East Asia to Europe

    However, apparently, trains cannot transport equivalent amount of cargo, and it would introduce an additional expensive reloading stage compared to a canal. So at best, it will be an alternative for a minority of cargo going through Suez Canal.


    There’s also some kind of US opposition to China’s projects in Israel. For example, USA is trying to block China from buying the old port in Haifa.

    But there is already a new artificial island being constructed to give Haifa more cargo capacity.

    Since the northern Port of Haifa was inaugurated in 1933, preceding even the state’s foundation, it has served as the primary naval gateway for everything from waves of Jewish immigrants to container shipments.

    But officials are now pushing forward with a privatization plan meant to make it more competitive, right as Shanghai International Port Group Co. prepares to open an advanced harbor next year in the same city.

    Officials want to sell the older Haifa port for as much as 2 billion shekels ($586 million), but regardless of the final price, the first 1 billion shekels from any deal will go into upgrades like building a new deep-water platform.

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2020-08-04/supply-chains-latest-israel-s-top-port-is-for-sale

    Chinese government has already bought the new artificial island port next to Haifa. It looks like the artificial island port is being constructed a couple kilometres from Haifa.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Blinky Bill
    @Dmitry

    https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQFL4mOPq8tGOoIqmwKSwme2u7IdKp-cKkB5w&usqp.jpg


    sino-israel.org/media/
    , @blatnoi
    @Dmitry

    I think it's only 2 or 3 years old. The people in charge on the Technion side are mostly not engineers I believe, but general sciences, and the plan is maybe to make it into a research university in all fields, but they decided to start with engineering degrees to get a large number of students at the beginning and to build up a reputation first.

    I heard that there were plans to create it about the time I was interviewing for a job at the Technion (I didn't get it...), so I've been checking up on its progress every once in a while, looking at open positions just in case I need a new job. I figure that if I got to the final stage at the Technion proper, they would probably hire me at this place, but currently it would be a step down.

    Of course there is big opposition to China-Israel cooperation from the US, since the latter was planning to use Israel as a research hub for military technologies. If the Chinese have a big presence and spying capacity, then it's not that good of a research hub. Plus the Chinese could get up to speed with desalination technology, etc... It's in Israel's interests to increase cooperation with China but make it so that the US doesn't notice it too much. It appears to me that the Chinese don't have the baggage of Christianity or Islam, and they respect Jews for being successful in science and money things (the giant money gift by the Chinese billionaire to the Technion is perhaps the most glaring example), so in the long term, it would make sense for a strong Israel to align with a friendly, authoritarian government far away.

    Thanks for the info on the Haifa port extension. It's amazing that they managed to actually build something and that fast. Places can change quite a bit when you're not there. The cargo train idea I agree is pretty dubious. There is also not enough place in Eilat really, to set up the required infrastructure, without destroying the environment and the tourism.

    Replies: @Dmitry
  • @Thulean Friend
    Been a lot of debate on Chinese soft power - or lack thereof - on this blog.

    Vietnamese favour South Korean and Chinese TV shows, Chinese TV shows gained six out of the top 6. Not a single Japanese show. Nor any Western one.

    Of course, China has long had a huge cultural imprint on Vietnam. But so has India over Pakistan, and that hasn't prevented Pakistan from throwing periodical fits. The last such incident was their PM trying to push Turkish dramas in some sort of Islamic narrative-pushing (even though many thoughtful Pakistani critics pointed out that those TV shows are as much about Turkic ethnic identity as Islam, but fragile Pakistani identity needs whatever it can get ahold of). Similar enmity has engulfed Vietnam in various anti-China actions in recent years. Despite this, China is making cultural inroads.

    ***

    This is a fairly sobering chart.

    https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Qswg9LrcxUE/X8fQz3eVfbI/AAAAAAAAzn4/zaZzOpie94Mxa5EFtwJ_TERxwckCSTJjQCLcBGAsYHQ/s0/Screenshot%2B2020-12-02%2Bat%2B12.35.46%2BPM.png

    There are six levels in PISA. The sixth level comprises the top few percentiles in mathematics. In absolute terms, China has a huge lead (though China's provinces in PISA 2018 was their "best foot forward"). The disclaimer at the bottom notes that even if you'd "only" apply a Taiwanese standard, it would still mean 20+ million kids at the highest levels compared to barely a million of the US.

    As I noted in the TIMSS post, these scholastic tests ignore human capital migration, so these things are not quite as dire for the US. But it is going to be an uphill battle for the West.

    Nevertheless, human capital is just one aspect. Systems is the other. That is where China had historically failed. It always had the intellectual werewithal to succeed, it just failed to nourish that talent and subsequently deploy it effectively.

    The slide is coming from this small presentation by a German academic (h/t Infoproc).

    ***

    Some thoughts on Greek, Persian, Arab, Indian, and Chinese science - a comparative perspective by an occassional commentator on this site who apparently has his own blog.

    Replies: @AaronB

    Is the assumption that more is better always correct?

    There may be an optimum number of scientists, engineers, etc, beyond which, no significant value is added. As automation increases, this will likely be more and more the case.

    There is this modern assumption that bigger and more is always better. But that may be mistaken.

    I do think Chinese have tremendous human capital, even though test scores say as much about motivation as they do innate ability (but that distinction doesn’t matter in this context).

    However, the real challenge for China is to nurture a small intellectual elite capable of making creative leaps, and the larger pool to draw from, only increases the odds. Systems and practices, as noted, are a huge factor, and systems and practices are “sticky”, deeply embedded, and hard to alter.

    I think the expectation that China will eventually develop a Western style intellectual pattern will lead to disappointment – and certainly not under the repressive CCP, where freedom of thought is not a priority.

    Rather, if the best predictor of the future is the past, perhaps we should look at China’s last Golden Age to see what Chinas new Golden Age – if she is indeed entering a new one, as many Chinese claim, and not just getting more modern and wealthy – will be like?

    That was over a 1,000 years ago, under the Tang. If the deeply embedded systems abd practices of Chinese culture have not changed too much, then they tend to produce a certain kind of mentality, whose most creative and impressive expression can be seen under the Tang.

    That mentality, applied to Western science, may create a new kind of science, and a new kind of modernity.

    Instead of expecting China to continue the Western tradition, we will hopefully get something new – and better. Less Promethean, and more humanistic.

  • Are conspiracy theories, a religious search for meaning?

    Sure, there are conspiracies every now and then, but I’m talking about people who think conspiracy theories are basically the way the world works, and explains everything about history. Protocols stuff.

    This kind conspiracy thinking, does the following

    1) imposes order on a chaotic world. Randomness, which is frightening, doesn’t exist. All major world events are intentional and planned out. This substitutes for God.

    2) history has a purpose and a direction.

    3) I, my little insignificant self, am actually hugely important. The most powerful and brilliant minds of the universe spend their days strategizing about how to control and manipulate little old me. Before, God used to spend all his time involved in the petty lives of humans.

    4) the bad things in my life are not random.

    It is difficult not to see, that conspiracy thinking is basically a religious quest for freedom in a random and chaotic world. It is a meaning giving Life Raft.

  • In a deeper sense then, God is not completely absent in the face of human suffering. Suffering is a forge, to make the ‘weak’ and the ‘helpless’ who looks for help from the outside, strong enough, to find strength within.

    https://sialmirzagoraya.substack.com/p/guru-nanaks-baburvani-a-sikh-theory

  • Been a lot of debate on Chinese soft power – or lack thereof – on this blog.

    Vietnamese favour South Korean and Chinese TV shows, Chinese TV shows gained six out of the top 6. Not a single Japanese show. Nor any Western one.

    Of course, China has long had a huge cultural imprint on Vietnam. But so has India over Pakistan, and that hasn’t prevented Pakistan from throwing periodical fits. The last such incident was their PM trying to push Turkish dramas in some sort of Islamic narrative-pushing (even though many thoughtful Pakistani critics pointed out that those TV shows are as much about Turkic ethnic identity as Islam, but fragile Pakistani identity needs whatever it can get ahold of). Similar enmity has engulfed Vietnam in various anti-China actions in recent years. Despite this, China is making cultural inroads.

    ***

    This is a fairly sobering chart.

    There are six levels in PISA. The sixth level comprises the top few percentiles in mathematics. In absolute terms, China has a huge lead (though China’s provinces in PISA 2018 was their “best foot forward”). The disclaimer at the bottom notes that even if you’d “only” apply a Taiwanese standard, it would still mean 20+ million kids at the highest levels compared to barely a million of the US.

    As I noted in the TIMSS post, these scholastic tests ignore human capital migration, so these things are not quite as dire for the US. But it is going to be an uphill battle for the West.

    Nevertheless, human capital is just one aspect. Systems is the other. That is where China had historically failed. It always had the intellectual werewithal to succeed, it just failed to nourish that talent and subsequently deploy it effectively.

    The slide is coming from this small presentation by a German academic (h/t Infoproc).

    ***

    Some thoughts on Greek, Persian, Arab, Indian, and Chinese science – a comparative perspective by an occassional commentator on this site who apparently has his own blog.

    •ï¿½Replies: @AaronB
    @Thulean Friend

    Is the assumption that more is better always correct?

    There may be an optimum number of scientists, engineers, etc, beyond which, no significant value is added. As automation increases, this will likely be more and more the case.

    There is this modern assumption that bigger and more is always better. But that may be mistaken.

    I do think Chinese have tremendous human capital, even though test scores say as much about motivation as they do innate ability (but that distinction doesn't matter in this context).

    However, the real challenge for China is to nurture a small intellectual elite capable of making creative leaps, and the larger pool to draw from, only increases the odds. Systems and practices, as noted, are a huge factor, and systems and practices are "sticky", deeply embedded, and hard to alter.

    I think the expectation that China will eventually develop a Western style intellectual pattern will lead to disappointment - and certainly not under the repressive CCP, where freedom of thought is not a priority.

    Rather, if the best predictor of the future is the past, perhaps we should look at China's last Golden Age to see what Chinas new Golden Age - if she is indeed entering a new one, as many Chinese claim, and not just getting more modern and wealthy - will be like?

    That was over a 1,000 years ago, under the Tang. If the deeply embedded systems abd practices of Chinese culture have not changed too much, then they tend to produce a certain kind of mentality, whose most creative and impressive expression can be seen under the Tang.

    That mentality, applied to Western science, may create a new kind of science, and a new kind of modernity.

    Instead of expecting China to continue the Western tradition, we will hopefully get something new - and better. Less Promethean, and more humanistic.
  • @AltanBakshi
    @Europe Europa

    https://i0.wp.com/starkeycomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Featured-Image-1.jpg?resize=1170%2C550&ssl=1

    https://i.pinimg.com/736x/92/92/63/929263e894d8973f05af450bd637dc69.jpg

    Its a consensus among historians that Gaelic was a language of majority of inhabitants of Scotland till 1200-1300 AD

    But you are right that English or Anglo Saxon has been spoken for a very long time in parts of Scotland.

    https://starkeycomics.com/2019/03/01/a-brief-history-of-british-and-irish-languages/

    https://i2.wp.com/starkeycomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/1000AD.jpg?resize=752%2C1024&ssl=1

    Replies: @Europe Europa

    Celtic nationalism is mostly a proxy to attack the English, it’s no coincidence that 90% of Celtic nationalism is heavily allied with left wing/Marxist politics. It’s to give further credence to the idea that the English are a race of brutal fascistic oppressors deserving of their fate of being wiped out.

    The leftist establishment will only back their hideously white culture and language insofar as it serves the agenda of destroying the English. Once the English are out of the way as a viable cultural/political force, and that day can’t be far off, they will drop the Celts like a piece of trash. Celtic nationalists are precisely what Lenin would have termed “useful idiots”.

    •ï¿½Replies: @AltanBakshi
    @Europe Europa

    I dont know much about Celtic nationalism, but arent nationalist or racially minded English already out as a "cultural/political force," havent they been out for a sometime already?

    Its odd when people always forget that its not the French who first murdered their king, but the English.

    Can there even be a worse crime or transgression committed by the people than that of regicide? Theres a deicide...

    Replies: @sher singh
  • I find it strange how Iceland is Eurosceptic and aggressively defends its large fishing grounds, and most leftists consider them absolutely heroic for doing so. Yet when Britain is Eurosceptic and tries to defend its fishing grounds, the left consider it racist and practically an act of war. Such double standards going on there.

  • @Europe Europa
    @(((They))) Live

    Gaelic has probably been in Scotland, mainly the Highlands, marginally longer than English due to Ireland being geographically closer than South East England, but overall both cultures arrived in Britain about the same time and were competing groups of colonialists.

    I don't get why Scots, who are mostly English-speaking Lowlanders, are considered Celtic because part of the country traditionally spoke a Celtic language. It would be like saying English people are Celts because Cornwall has a (revived) Celtic language, and Cumbria used to speak a Celtic language.

    Replies: @AltanBakshi

    https://i0.wp.com/starkeycomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Featured-Image-1.jpg?resize=1170%2C550&ssl=1

    Its a consensus among historians that Gaelic was a language of majority of inhabitants of Scotland till 1200-1300 AD

    But you are right that English or Anglo Saxon has been spoken for a very long time in parts of Scotland.

    https://starkeycomics.com/2019/03/01/a-brief-history-of-british-and-irish-languages/

    https://i2.wp.com/starkeycomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/1000AD.jpg?resize=752%2C1024&ssl=1

    •ï¿½Replies: @Europe Europa
    @AltanBakshi

    Celtic nationalism is mostly a proxy to attack the English, it's no coincidence that 90% of Celtic nationalism is heavily allied with left wing/Marxist politics. It's to give further credence to the idea that the English are a race of brutal fascistic oppressors deserving of their fate of being wiped out.

    The leftist establishment will only back their hideously white culture and language insofar as it serves the agenda of destroying the English. Once the English are out of the way as a viable cultural/political force, and that day can't be far off, they will drop the Celts like a piece of trash. Celtic nationalists are precisely what Lenin would have termed "useful idiots".

    Replies: @AltanBakshi
  • @(((They))) Live
    @Europe Europa

    So we both agree that Gaelic has been in Scotland longer than English, go raibh maith agat

    Replies: @Europe Europa

    Gaelic has probably been in Scotland, mainly the Highlands, marginally longer than English due to Ireland being geographically closer than South East England, but overall both cultures arrived in Britain about the same time and were competing groups of colonialists.

    I don’t get why Scots, who are mostly English-speaking Lowlanders, are considered Celtic because part of the country traditionally spoke a Celtic language. It would be like saying English people are Celts because Cornwall has a (revived) Celtic language, and Cumbria used to speak a Celtic language.

    •ï¿½Replies: @AltanBakshi
    @Europe Europa

    https://i0.wp.com/starkeycomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Featured-Image-1.jpg?resize=1170%2C550&ssl=1

    https://i.pinimg.com/736x/92/92/63/929263e894d8973f05af450bd637dc69.jpg

    Its a consensus among historians that Gaelic was a language of majority of inhabitants of Scotland till 1200-1300 AD

    But you are right that English or Anglo Saxon has been spoken for a very long time in parts of Scotland.

    https://starkeycomics.com/2019/03/01/a-brief-history-of-british-and-irish-languages/

    https://i2.wp.com/starkeycomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/1000AD.jpg?resize=752%2C1024&ssl=1

    Replies: @Europe Europa
  • @szonyi
    @Europe Europa


    I’ve noticed that most serious scholars of Chinese history seem to be non-Chinese, mainly Westerners.
    �
    Most serious scholars of Chinese history are Chinese and Japanese.

    Sinology in the West is actually a very small and weak field. You can be a China expert in foreign relations or even be in academic Sinology without really being able to read Chinese.

    The Chinese are obsessed with their history. The typical Chinese is more familiar with their history, and historical allusions, references are a much bigger part of their culture and language than in the West. Chinese history and their massive corpus of historical literature along with poetry play the role in cultural consciousness that the Bible and literature and popular culture play in the West.

    Replies: @Europe Europa

    The Chinese are obsessed with their history. The typical Chinese is more familiar with their history, and historical allusions, references are a much bigger part of their culture and language than in the West. Chinese history and their massive corpus of historical literature along with poetry play the role in cultural consciousness that the Bible and literature and popular culture play in the West.

    A lot of their interest in history seems very political though, like they will try to link the oldest archaeological sites they have to the modern day Han Chinese when in many cases there’s no evidence to do so.

    It would be like if there was a political agenda in England to link Stonehenge to the modern English, which there isn’t and anyone who attempted to make such a link would be laughed at at best and probably considered a mentally unhinged “racist”. I have no doubt that if Stonehenge was in China, the Chinese would say it was built by the Han.

    •ï¿½Replies: @szonyi
    @Europe Europa

    Well archaeology isn't the same thing as history. History proper refers to written records, along with other accounts and material artifacts if they're available. The Chinese obsession and interest in their history I refer to is via their historical literature which is from roughly the time of Classical Greece and later to medieval times.

    Stonehenge is from 3,000 BC and thus much older, and it's as far as we know prehistoric since there haven't been any accompanying written records discovered.

    I believe there is some genetic connection between the modern English and the ancient Britons who built Stonehenge. But one reason the connection is not affirmed as strongly or at all by modern Britons is because the historical population movements and invasions into the British Isles over the past 2500 years by Celts, Romans, Vikings, Danes, and Anglo-Saxons. Modern Britons typically identify primarily with these groups and as being their descendants.

    By contrast, China did not have these large population and cultural changes in the same period. There were small populations that invaded and conquered the government, such as the Mongols, but they were typically small and adopted Chinese ways and language, unlike the Celts or Anglo-Saxons who imposed or replaced their language and culture in Britain.

    Because of China and East Asia's isolation from other population groups by geographic barriers such as the Gobi and the Himalayas, archaeologists do tend to connect prehistoric archaeological sites in China to ancestral Chinese.
  • @Daniel Chieh
    @AltanBakshi

    I was wondering to check with you on something - can you email me at [email�protected]?

    Thanks!

    Replies: @AltanBakshi

    Okay, I have just sent an email to you. My email address starts with a letter T.

    •ï¿½Thanks: Daniel Chieh
  • @Dmitry
    @AaronB

    China and India vote against Israel in the UN, but in terms of policies China is one of the most pro-Israel countries, under current CCP leadership.

    Chinese government builds much of the new housing and infrastructure in Israel, much like in Ethiopia. When I have last visited Israel in 2018, I saw many groups Chinese government looking workers, near the business parks, and large Chinese infrastructure projects with Chinese flags, such as the vast holes where they dig tunnels under the city of Tel Aviv and Ramat Gan.

    There is more hidden and informal Chinese power projection in countries like Spain and UK. In Spain, Chinese people seem to own much small convenience shops, while in UK, there are many Chinese elite living in large numbers and probably buying apartments. In Israel, the Chinese power projection seems less secretive, more formal, and more composing of government workers.

    I assume Chinese investment in Israel is related to "Belt and Road Initiative". China's government buy strategic assets in Israel, like its ports, and it even bought Israel's dairy collective farms (and then they import this milk which is collectively farmed in the Middle East, into China).

    China may be interested in Israel, because they view it as a potential trading connection between Mediterranean Sea and the Indian Ocean (via its port on the Red Sea).

    If I was Chinese, I would feel that investing in Israel was cleverer than investing in Ethiopia. In many ways, Israel has third world African standards. For example, in construction safety, Israel is more like an African country, than a European country, and hundreds of Chinese construction workers have been killed in Israel. But in terms of property rights, Israel is safer to invest in than probably almost all African countries. There won't suddenly be a revolution and dictatorship in Israel that would expropriate foreign investors, whereas in Ethiopia the Chinese probably underestimate African political instability

    Replies: @Blinky Bill, @blatnoi, @Blinky Bill

    And on the other side, who wouldn’t want a cushy research job in sunny Shantou in this new Israeli university? A billionaire from Guangdong gave a whole bunch of money to the Technion on the condition they open up a branch in his hometown. It may have Chinese government support as well, I’m not sure.

    https://www.gtiit.edu.cn/en/index.aspx

    Though, when I was looking for work last it was rather new and not that well built up yet. It’s still fairly small actually, and it’s full of Israelis so it could be problematic from a workplace politics perspective. For me an ideal mix would be 20% Israelis and 80% normals.

    From their ‘About’ page:

    “GTIIT will be a state-of-the-art university dedicated to innovative research, environmental conservation, and social prosperity.

    The university will advance Guangdong province, the People’s Republic of China, the State of Israel and all humanity.

    A brainchild of Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Guangdong Technion – Israel Institute of Technology will become a leading science and technology research university by leveraging the power of entrepreneurship and innovation with rich China culture.

    Guangdong Technion – Israel Institute of Technology will focus on creating pioneering leaders and researchers, through close ties with local industry and topnotch graduate-level, masters, doctoral and postdoctoral level programs.”

    •ï¿½Thanks: Blinky Bill
    •ï¿½Replies: @Dmitry
    @blatnoi

    Yes I noticed about that story more than a year ago. It's a kind of engineering school.
    https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1272023946297233

    -

    In terms of "Belt and Road Initiative", China is interested in the backup/alternative to Suez Canal via Israel, with the construction of an Eilat-Ashdod cargo train.

    This would be an alternative cargo route from East Asia to Europe
    https://i.imgur.com/RL5wugY.jpg


    However, apparently, trains cannot transport equivalent amount of cargo, and it would introduce an additional expensive reloading stage compared to a canal. So at best, it will be an alternative for a minority of cargo going through Suez Canal.

    -
    There's also some kind of US opposition to China's projects in Israel. For example, USA is trying to block China from buying the old port in Haifa.

    But there is already a new artificial island being constructed to give Haifa more cargo capacity.

    Since the northern Port of Haifa was inaugurated in 1933, preceding even the state’s foundation, it has served as the primary naval gateway for everything from waves of Jewish immigrants to container shipments.

    But officials are now pushing forward with a privatization plan meant to make it more competitive, right as Shanghai International Port Group Co. prepares to open an advanced harbor next year in the same city.

    Officials want to sell the older Haifa port for as much as 2 billion shekels ($586 million), but regardless of the final price, the first 1 billion shekels from any deal will go into upgrades like building a new deep-water platform.
    �
    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2020-08-04/supply-chains-latest-israel-s-top-port-is-for-sale

    Chinese government has already bought the new artificial island port next to Haifa. It looks like the artificial island port is being constructed a couple kilometres from Haifa.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kWJxjHZR3WA

    Replies: @Blinky Bill, @blatnoi
    , @Dmitry
    @blatnoi


    It may have Chinese government support as well, I’m not sure.

    �
    It is definitely a Chinese government project (for training young engineers with an Israeli designed syllabus). China-Israel projects seem to have only a character of "top down", or operating through the Chinese government.

    Expensive looking campus buildings. Atmosphere of students - to study engineering with a lot of patriotism?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0Ye-m7ruTA
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oY3nKAK1SsA
  • @The Spirit of Enoch Powell
    Some more Cyberpunk 2077 related stuff

    https://i.ibb.co/Q8TRQJW/Crime-Stat.png

    https://i.ibb.co/9g3Xndq/FurFag.png

    And it is a furry taking issue, imagine my shock...

    Replies: @The Spirit of Enoch Powell

    More context

  • @AltanBakshi
    @Thulean Friend

    "There’s something magical about cities built on archipelagos."
    Yep, then you would love St Petersburg, its on whole another level than Stockholm.

    Replies: @Thulean Friend, @Daniel Chieh

    I was wondering to check with you on something – can you email me at [email�protected]?

    Thanks!

    •ï¿½Replies: @AltanBakshi
    @Daniel Chieh

    Okay, I have just sent an email to you. My email address starts with a letter T.
  • Humor for the Open thread:

    New Military Tactic Takes Advantage of U.S. Election Fraud

    PEACE 😇
    �

  • @Blinky Bill
    @songbird

    They are quite a few people who fit this description. Some more open about their foreign ancestry than others. Here is one example.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Wong_%28Hong_Kong_actor%29

    I could give you a list of 20 people, all with "big noses" but very few of them would be of Jewish or of suspected Jewish ancestry ancestry. Bruce Lee definitely (Bosman), Jackie Chan no way! I know his family ancestry very well, in particular his family members who never left China. If he isn't pure Han, I'll eat my hat!

    Replies: @songbird

    With this fellow, I think it was just a myth that he had a foreign background, but he was picked on for his nose, anyway. I’m thinking it must have been Chan. In the movie Painted Faces, he’s called “Big Nose.” I think it is meant to be biographical. And, since he was away from his parents while in the troupe, I can see how it would make sense for people to pick on him and question his antecedents.

  • @Inselaffen
    @128

    Eastern Euro migrants don't 'balance out' native displacement, they contribute to it.
    I only have a positive impression of them at a personal level (in particular, gyms I go tend to be full of masculine, hardworking East Euro guys which makes me wonder where any native 'men' still exist at all) but at this point it's seriously grating that I'm kind of a minority in my 'own' country in my mileu, at work, at home (the wog couple upstairs yell at each other 24/7, not completely sure what language), at play, etc.

    If my only concern would be other white faces and access to the EU, why not just cut to the chase and move to Eastern Europe myself? (certainly it's something I'd consider but that's not the point here...)

    We'll see to what extent a 'large' increase in 'Pakistanis, Indians, and Africans' actually happens, but I'd expect that would push even more natives further towards Nationalism anyway which would be a benefit in my book.

    Replies: @Coconuts

    …but at this point it’s seriously grating that I’m kind of a minority in my ‘own’ country in my mileu, at work, at home (the wog couple upstairs yell at each other 24/7, not completely sure what language), at play, etc.

    I was used to this in bigger cities but I moved to a smaller town in the countryside in the North East of England and am pretty surprised by the level of diversity here, given the low level of economic activity compared to many other parts of the UK. There is a small number but broad range of non-whites (Turks, Indians, Pakistanis, Africans) and then Polish and Hungarian as well. If this is typical, together with the situation in the cities, the 2011 census data must be pretty out of date. Taking just England, it is maybe already over 20% ethnic minority and foreign born.

  • Some more Cyberpunk 2077 related stuff

    And it is a furry taking issue, imagine my shock…

    •ï¿½LOL: Daniel Chieh
    •ï¿½Replies: @The Spirit of Enoch Powell
    @The Spirit of Enoch Powell

    More context

    https://i.ibb.co/GQ84W40/Poland.jpg
  • @Tor597
    @The Spirit of Enoch Powell

    Spirit, what are you trying to say with this post?

    Replies: @The Spirit of Enoch Powell

    The NZ government recently released a report on the Christchurch attacks. One section of the report, which I linked in my original comment, is regarding the travel history of the gunman, Brenton Tarrant.

    I find it quite interesting how well travelled he was (he apparently funded his travels with money he made from a BitConnect investment, of all things), don’t they say “travelling makes you less racist”?

  • @The Spirit of Enoch Powell
    https://christchurchattack.royalcommission.nz/assets/Figures/Part-4-Chapter-3-Figure-7.png

    Christchurch mosque shooter Brenton Tarrant: World Travels - 15 April 2014 to 17 August 2017

    Replies: @Znzn, @Tor597

    Spirit, what are you trying to say with this post?

    •ï¿½Replies: @The Spirit of Enoch Powell
    @Tor597

    The NZ government recently released a report on the Christchurch attacks. One section of the report, which I linked in my original comment, is regarding the travel history of the gunman, Brenton Tarrant.

    I find it quite interesting how well travelled he was (he apparently funded his travels with money he made from a BitConnect investment, of all things), don't they say "travelling makes you less racist"?
  • A123 says:
    @szonyi
    @Europe Europa


    I was thinking that China has unnecessarily squandered its previously good reputation with Westerners out of some principle of making a point about Hong Kong.
    �
    China has little influence over its reputation among Westerners. Its reputation is largely going to be a function of Western elites and Western media. If Western elites decide to take a more hawkish stance towards China, as the US particularly has over the past few years, this gets reflected in media messaging which "manufactures consent" among the public.

    Hong Kong was handed over to China with the understanding that it would be gradually incorporated into the PRC. It would have some autonomy during this process, but it was never understood that it would be autonomous indefinitely or have independence.

    As a part of its more confrontational, hawkish stance towards China, the US basically broke the spirit of this understanding by promoting a color revolution in Hong Kong which lasted for much of the past decade. From the US perspective, this was a good strategy because either possible outcome was favorable to the US's aims: Either the color revolution would succeed and Hong Kong would become an independent US satellite opposed to the PRC, or the attempted color revolution would be successfully suppressed by the PRC, which could then be portrayed as reflecting the excesses of the PRC and justifying the US's more hawkish and confrontational stance.

    China had no good options, really, and it's understandable that they decided to suppress the burgeoning rebellion.

    Replies: @A123

    Hong Kong was handed over to China with the understanding that it would be gradually incorporated into the PRC. It would have some autonomy during this process, but it was never understood that it would be autonomous indefinitely or have independence.

    The giant foreseeable error of the CCP Elites was economic.

    A key driver of foreign business in HK was access to UK Law for contracts. The sharp decline in jobs & salaries was highly predictable as activities dependant on UK Law had to relocate. The Elite CCP did nothing to help workers in HK, even though Central Government action caused employment to decrease.

    Why is anyone surprised? Ruthlessly diminishing prospects for parents and their children inevitably creates unrest.

    PEACE 😇

  • @Europe Europa
    @(((They))) Live

    The Gaels invaded Scotland from Ireland in the 5th century, around the same time as the Anglo-Saxons invaded through the South East and East coast of what is now England. So the Gaelic and English languages have been present in Britain for roughly the same amount of time.

    Scotland before the Gaels invaded was obviously predominantly Pictish, who according to mainstream academia spoke a Brythonic language, as the whole of Britain did at that time but the Gaels replaced that with their own Gaelic language, either through assimilation or genocide. The ancestors of most Scots today were Anglo-Saxons, which is why most Scots have always spoken English and not Gaelic.

    I would also highlight that there is no strong evidence that the Picts were even Celtic people of any sort, as the few stones that have been found with Pictish inscriptions have never been successfully deciphered at all, so the claim that Pictish was a Brythonic language is pure assumption based on the belief that the whole of Britain spoke Brythonic languages at that time, and likely a politically correct assumption to make the Gaels seem less like invading, genocidal foreigners.

    It's interesting that Bede described Pictish as a distinct language in its own right, separate from English, Brythonic and Gaelic.

    Replies: @(((They))) Live

    So we both agree that Gaelic has been in Scotland longer than English, go raibh maith agat

    •ï¿½Replies: @Europe Europa
    @(((They))) Live

    Gaelic has probably been in Scotland, mainly the Highlands, marginally longer than English due to Ireland being geographically closer than South East England, but overall both cultures arrived in Britain about the same time and were competing groups of colonialists.

    I don't get why Scots, who are mostly English-speaking Lowlanders, are considered Celtic because part of the country traditionally spoke a Celtic language. It would be like saying English people are Celts because Cornwall has a (revived) Celtic language, and Cumbria used to speak a Celtic language.

    Replies: @AltanBakshi
  • @128
    At least with EU membership, you get Eastern European migrants to balance things out, and you have free access to the EU market, plus their help in trade disputes, hard Brexit will cause Northern Ireland and Scotland to leave, which will put the nuclear deterence in doubt.

    Replies: @The Spirit of Enoch Powell, @A123, @Europe Europa, @Inselaffen

    Eastern Euro migrants don’t ‘balance out’ native displacement, they contribute to it.
    I only have a positive impression of them at a personal level (in particular, gyms I go tend to be full of masculine, hardworking East Euro guys which makes me wonder where any native ‘men’ still exist at all) but at this point it’s seriously grating that I’m kind of a minority in my ‘own’ country in my mileu, at work, at home (the wog couple upstairs yell at each other 24/7, not completely sure what language), at play, etc.

    If my only concern would be other white faces and access to the EU, why not just cut to the chase and move to Eastern Europe myself? (certainly it’s something I’d consider but that’s not the point here…)

    We’ll see to what extent a ‘large’ increase in ‘Pakistanis, Indians, and Africans’ actually happens, but I’d expect that would push even more natives further towards Nationalism anyway which would be a benefit in my book.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Coconuts
    @Inselaffen


    ...but at this point it’s seriously grating that I’m kind of a minority in my ‘own’ country in my mileu, at work, at home (the wog couple upstairs yell at each other 24/7, not completely sure what language), at play, etc.

    �
    I was used to this in bigger cities but I moved to a smaller town in the countryside in the North East of England and am pretty surprised by the level of diversity here, given the low level of economic activity compared to many other parts of the UK. There is a small number but broad range of non-whites (Turks, Indians, Pakistanis, Africans) and then Polish and Hungarian as well. If this is typical, together with the situation in the cities, the 2011 census data must be pretty out of date. Taking just England, it is maybe already over 20% ethnic minority and foreign born.
  • @songbird
    @Blinky Bill

    It has been so many years since I heard it, I forget. Who was that Chinese martial artist/movie star that the Chinese used to say had a big nose, and they suspected that he was part gweilo or something?

    I know that Bruce Lee was like 1/8 Jew, or something, but I'm not 100% sure it was him, and not Jackie Chan. I suspect it was Chan.

    Replies: @Blinky Bill

    They are quite a few people who fit this description. Some more open about their foreign ancestry than others. Here is one example.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Wong_%28Hong_Kong_actor%29

    I could give you a list of 20 people, all with “big noses” but very few of them would be of Jewish or of suspected Jewish ancestry ancestry. Bruce Lee definitely (Bosman), Jackie Chan no way! I know his family ancestry very well, in particular his family members who never left China. If he isn’t pure Han, I’ll eat my hat!

    •ï¿½Thanks: songbird
    •ï¿½Replies: @songbird
    @Blinky Bill

    With this fellow, I think it was just a myth that he had a foreign background, but he was picked on for his nose, anyway. I'm thinking it must have been Chan. In the movie Painted Faces, he's called "Big Nose." I think it is meant to be biographical. And, since he was away from his parents while in the troupe, I can see how it would make sense for people to pick on him and question his antecedents.
  • @Europe Europa
    @AaronB

    I've noticed that most serious scholars of Chinese history seem to be non-Chinese, mainly Westerners.

    Chinese mostly only seem interested in their ancient history if there's a commercial opportunity to be taken advantage of, such as the Great Wall and Terracotta Warriors tourism and I think they also superficially like those aspects of Chinese history because they are visibly grandiose sceptical that they feel gives them respect and credibility on the world stage.

    The panda thing is similar, their panda conservation is not because they value conservation and animal rights as a whole, it's because they feel the panda symbolism gives them respect and credibility and is a big part of China's "brand" so to speak.

    But in general most historical sites and ruins in China seem to be neglected, they think nothing of bulldozing ancient hutongs in Beijing for example to make way for more skyscrapers when most Western countries would regard such streets as national treasures, but to the Chinese they just seem to represent a primitive way of life and are seen as an embarrassment.

    Replies: @A123, @AaronB, @szonyi

    I’ve noticed that most serious scholars of Chinese history seem to be non-Chinese, mainly Westerners.

    Most serious scholars of Chinese history are Chinese and Japanese.

    Sinology in the West is actually a very small and weak field. You can be a China expert in foreign relations or even be in academic Sinology without really being able to read Chinese.

    The Chinese are obsessed with their history. The typical Chinese is more familiar with their history, and historical allusions, references are a much bigger part of their culture and language than in the West. Chinese history and their massive corpus of historical literature along with poetry play the role in cultural consciousness that the Bible and literature and popular culture play in the West.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Europe Europa
    @szonyi


    The Chinese are obsessed with their history. The typical Chinese is more familiar with their history, and historical allusions, references are a much bigger part of their culture and language than in the West. Chinese history and their massive corpus of historical literature along with poetry play the role in cultural consciousness that the Bible and literature and popular culture play in the West.
    �
    A lot of their interest in history seems very political though, like they will try to link the oldest archaeological sites they have to the modern day Han Chinese when in many cases there's no evidence to do so.

    It would be like if there was a political agenda in England to link Stonehenge to the modern English, which there isn't and anyone who attempted to make such a link would be laughed at at best and probably considered a mentally unhinged "racist". I have no doubt that if Stonehenge was in China, the Chinese would say it was built by the Han.

    Replies: @szonyi
  • @Europe Europa
    I was thinking that China has unnecessarily squandered its previously good reputation with Westerners out of some principle of making a point about Hong Kong.

    For decades most Westerners saw China as a reasonably friendly, benign country that makes most of their consumer products and also has nice food. They were also respected and admired by the nationalist right for their perceived tough policies against Muslims.

    It wasn't until a couple of years ago when China started coming down hard on Hong Kong that opinions in the West really started to change on China. I don't even think it was the pandemic that damaged China's reputation that much, the damage had already been done by the HK unrest.

    Overall I think China has made a mistake in insisting on making a point about Hong Kong. It's almost solely a pride/face thing. They have achieved little economically as a result and the damage to their reputation is probably worse than if they'd just let Hong Kong carry on with the status quo.

    Replies: @AaronB, @Daniel Chieh, @szonyi

    I was thinking that China has unnecessarily squandered its previously good reputation with Westerners out of some principle of making a point about Hong Kong.

    China has little influence over its reputation among Westerners. Its reputation is largely going to be a function of Western elites and Western media. If Western elites decide to take a more hawkish stance towards China, as the US particularly has over the past few years, this gets reflected in media messaging which “manufactures consent” among the public.

    Hong Kong was handed over to China with the understanding that it would be gradually incorporated into the PRC. It would have some autonomy during this process, but it was never understood that it would be autonomous indefinitely or have independence.

    As a part of its more confrontational, hawkish stance towards China, the US basically broke the spirit of this understanding by promoting a color revolution in Hong Kong which lasted for much of the past decade. From the US perspective, this was a good strategy because either possible outcome was favorable to the US’s aims: Either the color revolution would succeed and Hong Kong would become an independent US satellite opposed to the PRC, or the attempted color revolution would be successfully suppressed by the PRC, which could then be portrayed as reflecting the excesses of the PRC and justifying the US’s more hawkish and confrontational stance.

    China had no good options, really, and it’s understandable that they decided to suppress the burgeoning rebellion.

    •ï¿½Replies: @A123
    @szonyi


    Hong Kong was handed over to China with the understanding that it would be gradually incorporated into the PRC. It would have some autonomy during this process, but it was never understood that it would be autonomous indefinitely or have independence.
    �
    The giant foreseeable error of the CCP Elites was economic.

    A key driver of foreign business in HK was access to UK Law for contracts. The sharp decline in jobs & salaries was highly predictable as activities dependant on UK Law had to relocate. The Elite CCP did nothing to help workers in HK, even though Central Government action caused employment to decrease.

    Why is anyone surprised? Ruthlessly diminishing prospects for parents and their children inevitably creates unrest.

    PEACE 😇
  • @Blinky Bill
    @Dmitry

    https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2004-06/26/xin_0906012610547211993111.jpg


    Ehud Olmert, Israel's Prime Minister, Friday paid respects to his grandfather who is buried in the Jewish cemetery in Harbin, capital of Northeast China's Heilongjiang Province.

    "My grandfather will remain here forever, so this place is of great significance to me," Olmert said. "The place has become the symbol of the friendship between China and Israel."

    Olmert, also the Minister of Industry, Trade, Labour and Communications, had already visited Beijing and Shanghai before touring Harbin.

    He is leading a 200-strong Israeli trade delegation -- the largest from that country ever to China -- as part of a push by Israel to boost trade with China.

    The trip to Harbin has special meaning for Olmert.

    Harbin still preserves the largest cemetery of Jews in the Far East Region -- Harbin Huangshan Jewish Cemetery. Located in the east suburb of the city, the cemetery holds 677 graves, mainly of Israelis who once lived in Harbin.

    "Historically, Harbin was once the largest political, economic, and cultural centre for the Jews in the Far East Region. At the end of the 19th century, a lot of European Jews migrated to Harbin with the construction of the Mid-East railway. In the 1920s, the number of Jews in Harbin reached its peak of more than 20,000," said Li Shuxiao, the director of the Jewish Research Center of the Heilongjiang Provincial Academy of Social Sciences.

    "Diligent Jews formed an integrated social system in Harbin. They made great contribution to the city's economic development. These Jews are called 'Harbin Jews' in academic circles,"Li said.

    The municipal government appropriates special funds for the preservation of the cemetery every year. A detailed record and a website have been set up to facilitate management.

    Each year, many descendants of "Harbin Jews" from all over the world came back to Harbin. The number has increased steadily in recent years.

    This year, an international symposium organized by the Jewish Research Centre of Heilongjiang Provincial Academy of Social Sciences and Sino-Israeli Friendship Association, on the history and culture of Harbin Jews will be held in Harbin from August 30 to September 2.

    "Many scholars of Jewish culture from home and abroad as well as the Jews who once lived in China will join together for this event," said Qu Wei, the president of the academy.

    A large-scale exhibition called "Jews in Harbin" will be held during the symposium to present still-existing relics left by the Jews who lived in Harbin, such as auditoria, hospitals, and rest homes.


    �
    https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSRFMZYd25cQ6CcAk97lF6kgMeS4bZ9rgA0lw&usqp.jpg

    Replies: @Blinky Bill, @songbird

    It has been so many years since I heard it, I forget. Who was that Chinese martial artist/movie star that the Chinese used to say had a big nose, and they suspected that he was part gweilo or something?

    I know that Bruce Lee was like 1/8 Jew, or something, but I’m not 100% sure it was him, and not Jackie Chan. I suspect it was Chan.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Blinky Bill
    @songbird

    They are quite a few people who fit this description. Some more open about their foreign ancestry than others. Here is one example.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Wong_%28Hong_Kong_actor%29

    I could give you a list of 20 people, all with "big noses" but very few of them would be of Jewish or of suspected Jewish ancestry ancestry. Bruce Lee definitely (Bosman), Jackie Chan no way! I know his family ancestry very well, in particular his family members who never left China. If he isn't pure Han, I'll eat my hat!

    Replies: @songbird
  • I tend to think that nuclear war would be bad, but maybe that is because, if it happens, I would like it to be cataclysmic enough to end poz.

    But what if Anatoly’s version of nuclear war is correct? Within 24 hours, the bulldozers clear the streets and ports and supermarkets are open again. Within a week, they start promoting women with radiation burns as the new standard in beauty, but only until the two-headed trannies reach maturity.

    •ï¿½LOL: Anatoly Karlin
  • @Blinky Bill
    @Dmitry

    https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2004-06/26/xin_0906012610547211993111.jpg


    Ehud Olmert, Israel's Prime Minister, Friday paid respects to his grandfather who is buried in the Jewish cemetery in Harbin, capital of Northeast China's Heilongjiang Province.

    "My grandfather will remain here forever, so this place is of great significance to me," Olmert said. "The place has become the symbol of the friendship between China and Israel."

    Olmert, also the Minister of Industry, Trade, Labour and Communications, had already visited Beijing and Shanghai before touring Harbin.

    He is leading a 200-strong Israeli trade delegation -- the largest from that country ever to China -- as part of a push by Israel to boost trade with China.

    The trip to Harbin has special meaning for Olmert.

    Harbin still preserves the largest cemetery of Jews in the Far East Region -- Harbin Huangshan Jewish Cemetery. Located in the east suburb of the city, the cemetery holds 677 graves, mainly of Israelis who once lived in Harbin.

    "Historically, Harbin was once the largest political, economic, and cultural centre for the Jews in the Far East Region. At the end of the 19th century, a lot of European Jews migrated to Harbin with the construction of the Mid-East railway. In the 1920s, the number of Jews in Harbin reached its peak of more than 20,000," said Li Shuxiao, the director of the Jewish Research Center of the Heilongjiang Provincial Academy of Social Sciences.

    "Diligent Jews formed an integrated social system in Harbin. They made great contribution to the city's economic development. These Jews are called 'Harbin Jews' in academic circles,"Li said.

    The municipal government appropriates special funds for the preservation of the cemetery every year. A detailed record and a website have been set up to facilitate management.

    Each year, many descendants of "Harbin Jews" from all over the world came back to Harbin. The number has increased steadily in recent years.

    This year, an international symposium organized by the Jewish Research Centre of Heilongjiang Provincial Academy of Social Sciences and Sino-Israeli Friendship Association, on the history and culture of Harbin Jews will be held in Harbin from August 30 to September 2.

    "Many scholars of Jewish culture from home and abroad as well as the Jews who once lived in China will join together for this event," said Qu Wei, the president of the academy.

    A large-scale exhibition called "Jews in Harbin" will be held during the symposium to present still-existing relics left by the Jews who lived in Harbin, such as auditoria, hospitals, and rest homes.


    �
    https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSRFMZYd25cQ6CcAk97lF6kgMeS4bZ9rgA0lw&usqp.jpg

    Replies: @Blinky Bill, @songbird

    [MORE]

  • @Dmitry
    @AaronB

    China and India vote against Israel in the UN, but in terms of policies China is one of the most pro-Israel countries, under current CCP leadership.

    Chinese government builds much of the new housing and infrastructure in Israel, much like in Ethiopia. When I have last visited Israel in 2018, I saw many groups Chinese government looking workers, near the business parks, and large Chinese infrastructure projects with Chinese flags, such as the vast holes where they dig tunnels under the city of Tel Aviv and Ramat Gan.

    There is more hidden and informal Chinese power projection in countries like Spain and UK. In Spain, Chinese people seem to own much small convenience shops, while in UK, there are many Chinese elite living in large numbers and probably buying apartments. In Israel, the Chinese power projection seems less secretive, more formal, and more composing of government workers.

    I assume Chinese investment in Israel is related to "Belt and Road Initiative". China's government buy strategic assets in Israel, like its ports, and it even bought Israel's dairy collective farms (and then they import this milk which is collectively farmed in the Middle East, into China).

    China may be interested in Israel, because they view it as a potential trading connection between Mediterranean Sea and the Indian Ocean (via its port on the Red Sea).

    If I was Chinese, I would feel that investing in Israel was cleverer than investing in Ethiopia. In many ways, Israel has third world African standards. For example, in construction safety, Israel is more like an African country, than a European country, and hundreds of Chinese construction workers have been killed in Israel. But in terms of property rights, Israel is safer to invest in than probably almost all African countries. There won't suddenly be a revolution and dictatorship in Israel that would expropriate foreign investors, whereas in Ethiopia the Chinese probably underestimate African political instability

    Replies: @Blinky Bill, @blatnoi, @Blinky Bill


    [MORE]

    Ehud Olmert, Israel’s Prime Minister, Friday paid respects to his grandfather who is buried in the Jewish cemetery in Harbin, capital of Northeast China’s Heilongjiang Province.

    “My grandfather will remain here forever, so this place is of great significance to me,” Olmert said. “The place has become the symbol of the friendship between China and Israel.”

    Olmert, also the Minister of Industry, Trade, Labour and Communications, had already visited Beijing and Shanghai before touring Harbin.

    He is leading a 200-strong Israeli trade delegation — the largest from that country ever to China — as part of a push by Israel to boost trade with China.

    The trip to Harbin has special meaning for Olmert.

    Harbin still preserves the largest cemetery of Jews in the Far East Region — Harbin Huangshan Jewish Cemetery. Located in the east suburb of the city, the cemetery holds 677 graves, mainly of Israelis who once lived in Harbin.

    “Historically, Harbin was once the largest political, economic, and cultural centre for the Jews in the Far East Region. At the end of the 19th century, a lot of European Jews migrated to Harbin with the construction of the Mid-East railway. In the 1920s, the number of Jews in Harbin reached its peak of more than 20,000,” said Li Shuxiao, the director of the Jewish Research Center of the Heilongjiang Provincial Academy of Social Sciences.

    “Diligent Jews formed an integrated social system in Harbin. They made great contribution to the city’s economic development. These Jews are called ‘Harbin Jews’ in academic circles,”Li said.

    The municipal government appropriates special funds for the preservation of the cemetery every year. A detailed record and a website have been set up to facilitate management.

    Each year, many descendants of “Harbin Jews” from all over the world came back to Harbin. The number has increased steadily in recent years.

    This year, an international symposium organized by the Jewish Research Centre of Heilongjiang Provincial Academy of Social Sciences and Sino-Israeli Friendship Association, on the history and culture of Harbin Jews will be held in Harbin from August 30 to September 2.

    “Many scholars of Jewish culture from home and abroad as well as the Jews who once lived in China will join together for this event,” said Qu Wei, the president of the academy.

    A large-scale exhibition called “Jews in Harbin” will be held during the symposium to present still-existing relics left by the Jews who lived in Harbin, such as auditoria, hospitals, and rest homes.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Blinky Bill
    @Blinky Bill


    https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ3TdtwDiiEbtBTYIVDNqFV0boZ_f01yRIC_g&usqp.jpg
    , @songbird
    @Blinky Bill

    It has been so many years since I heard it, I forget. Who was that Chinese martial artist/movie star that the Chinese used to say had a big nose, and they suspected that he was part gweilo or something?

    I know that Bruce Lee was like 1/8 Jew, or something, but I'm not 100% sure it was him, and not Jackie Chan. I suspect it was Chan.

    Replies: @Blinky Bill
  • @The Spirit of Enoch Powell
    @Daniel Chieh

    Oh no, we got too cocky Polish bros

    https://i.ibb.co/wQ244w9/Screenshot-20201212-134751-2.png

    https://i.ibb.co/hdVH2rZ/Screenshot-20201212-175323-2.png

    Replies: @Another German Reader, @Anatoly Karlin

    “Mostly positive” on steam.

    I took it for a ride (not playing yet, just seeing if my i5-4670k/RTX 2060 will handle it) and it runs just fine FWIW on recommended settings. Might be untenable in outdoor or fight scenes, I suppose.

  • @AaronB
    @Pericles

    Judaism has been revised, and will continue to be, many times. Thats how it remains vital and alive, organic and adaptable.

    In Judaism, you are supposed to be constantly adding and refining. It isn't static.

    As for being hated, if someone doesn't hate you, you don't exist.

    Replies: @Pericles

    I am beginning to question, if it is appropriate to question peoples sacred idols. Socrates, as we know, was killed for it.

    The reaction of people like AltanBakshi, Ano4, Daniel Chieh, and countless others, has made me reconsider whether it is right to question peoples sacred cows. Enraged by my presentation of alternative opinions, they lash out in fury, distress, and anxiety, threatened and afraid.

    The most important thing in life, is that we become satisfied with ourselves and reconciled to life. To achieve this, we invent all sorts of myths, illusions, snd fantasies, narratives that we cling to as a life raft, amid the uncertainties and dangers of life. [go on, read the whole thing]

    Instead of screwing with other cultures and their sacred cows, why not have a shot at revising judaism so you won’t be hated everywhere you turn up. Try to be more like parsis or something. You figure it out.

    Judaism has been revised, and will continue to be, many times. Thats how it remains vital and alive, organic and adaptable.

    In Judaism, you are supposed to be constantly adding and refining. It isn’t static.

    As for being hated, if someone doesn’t hate you, you don’t exist.

    Lol. And there, dear readers, you have it.

  • @AaronB
    @The Spirit of Enoch Powell

    Interesting video.

    Its amusing to see Chinese still think Jews have big noses lol :) If only we could be identified so easily!

    There is no special animosity among American Jews to China. Opinion is divided in the usual way, although there is probably a positive attitude to the Chinese ethny.

    Israel has no problem with China, and is only limited in its ties with China by deference to America. But Israel is always pragmatic, as it must be. Israel had warm relations with South Africa, aa well.

    Its funny, but in the most hilarious, shameless, "let's you and him fight" ploy, Ron Unz tried to act as if Israel is the primary enemy of China, because it controls America, etc, etc :) I got a huge kick out of that. Nice try, Ron :) I don't think Chinese are stupid enough to adopt your petty obsessions.

    My own anti CCP stance is driven by my liberalism, and has nothing to do with being Jewish.

    But for many, there does seem to be a connection there. The antisemites seem to love and admire the CCP, but I attribute that to a spiritual kinship - "asshole" type people stick together. Thats why the antisemites like Iran and the CCP - assoholes admire each other.

    I have to stop calling it China- what I dislike, is the CCP, not China.

    Replies: @The Spirit of Enoch Powell, @Dmitry

    China and India vote against Israel in the UN, but in terms of policies China is one of the most pro-Israel countries, under current CCP leadership.

    Chinese government builds much of the new housing and infrastructure in Israel, much like in Ethiopia. When I have last visited Israel in 2018, I saw many groups Chinese government looking workers, near the business parks, and large Chinese infrastructure projects with Chinese flags, such as the vast holes where they dig tunnels under the city of Tel Aviv and Ramat Gan.

    There is more hidden and informal Chinese power projection in countries like Spain and UK. In Spain, Chinese people seem to own much small convenience shops, while in UK, there are many Chinese elite living in large numbers and probably buying apartments. In Israel, the Chinese power projection seems less secretive, more formal, and more composing of government workers.

    I assume Chinese investment in Israel is related to “Belt and Road Initiative”. China’s government buy strategic assets in Israel, like its ports, and it even bought Israel’s dairy collective farms (and then they import this milk which is collectively farmed in the Middle East, into China).

    China may be interested in Israel, because they view it as a potential trading connection between Mediterranean Sea and the Indian Ocean (via its port on the Red Sea).

    If I was Chinese, I would feel that investing in Israel was cleverer than investing in Ethiopia. In many ways, Israel has third world African standards. For example, in construction safety, Israel is more like an African country, than a European country, and hundreds of Chinese construction workers have been killed in Israel. But in terms of property rights, Israel is safer to invest in than probably almost all African countries. There won’t suddenly be a revolution and dictatorship in Israel that would expropriate foreign investors, whereas in Ethiopia the Chinese probably underestimate African political instability

    •ï¿½Replies: @Blinky Bill
    @Dmitry

    https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2004-06/26/xin_0906012610547211993111.jpg


    Ehud Olmert, Israel's Prime Minister, Friday paid respects to his grandfather who is buried in the Jewish cemetery in Harbin, capital of Northeast China's Heilongjiang Province.

    "My grandfather will remain here forever, so this place is of great significance to me," Olmert said. "The place has become the symbol of the friendship between China and Israel."

    Olmert, also the Minister of Industry, Trade, Labour and Communications, had already visited Beijing and Shanghai before touring Harbin.

    He is leading a 200-strong Israeli trade delegation -- the largest from that country ever to China -- as part of a push by Israel to boost trade with China.

    The trip to Harbin has special meaning for Olmert.

    Harbin still preserves the largest cemetery of Jews in the Far East Region -- Harbin Huangshan Jewish Cemetery. Located in the east suburb of the city, the cemetery holds 677 graves, mainly of Israelis who once lived in Harbin.

    "Historically, Harbin was once the largest political, economic, and cultural centre for the Jews in the Far East Region. At the end of the 19th century, a lot of European Jews migrated to Harbin with the construction of the Mid-East railway. In the 1920s, the number of Jews in Harbin reached its peak of more than 20,000," said Li Shuxiao, the director of the Jewish Research Center of the Heilongjiang Provincial Academy of Social Sciences.

    "Diligent Jews formed an integrated social system in Harbin. They made great contribution to the city's economic development. These Jews are called 'Harbin Jews' in academic circles,"Li said.

    The municipal government appropriates special funds for the preservation of the cemetery every year. A detailed record and a website have been set up to facilitate management.

    Each year, many descendants of "Harbin Jews" from all over the world came back to Harbin. The number has increased steadily in recent years.

    This year, an international symposium organized by the Jewish Research Centre of Heilongjiang Provincial Academy of Social Sciences and Sino-Israeli Friendship Association, on the history and culture of Harbin Jews will be held in Harbin from August 30 to September 2.

    "Many scholars of Jewish culture from home and abroad as well as the Jews who once lived in China will join together for this event," said Qu Wei, the president of the academy.

    A large-scale exhibition called "Jews in Harbin" will be held during the symposium to present still-existing relics left by the Jews who lived in Harbin, such as auditoria, hospitals, and rest homes.


    �
    https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSRFMZYd25cQ6CcAk97lF6kgMeS4bZ9rgA0lw&usqp.jpg

    Replies: @Blinky Bill, @songbird
    , @blatnoi
    @Dmitry

    And on the other side, who wouldn't want a cushy research job in sunny Shantou in this new Israeli university? A billionaire from Guangdong gave a whole bunch of money to the Technion on the condition they open up a branch in his hometown. It may have Chinese government support as well, I'm not sure.

    https://www.gtiit.edu.cn/en/index.aspx

    Though, when I was looking for work last it was rather new and not that well built up yet. It's still fairly small actually, and it's full of Israelis so it could be problematic from a workplace politics perspective. For me an ideal mix would be 20% Israelis and 80% normals.

    From their 'About' page:

    "GTIIT will be a state-of-the-art university dedicated to innovative research, environmental conservation, and social prosperity.

    The university will advance Guangdong province, the People's Republic of China, the State of Israel and all humanity.

    A brainchild of Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Guangdong Technion - Israel Institute of Technology will become a leading science and technology research university by leveraging the power of entrepreneurship and innovation with rich China culture.

    Guangdong Technion - Israel Institute of Technology will focus on creating pioneering leaders and researchers, through close ties with local industry and topnotch graduate-level, masters, doctoral and postdoctoral level programs."

    Replies: @Dmitry, @Dmitry
    , @Blinky Bill
    @Dmitry

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EpeXFcNUYAQ9vwG.jpg
  • @The Spirit of Enoch Powell
    @Daniel Chieh

    Oh no, we got too cocky Polish bros

    https://i.ibb.co/wQ244w9/Screenshot-20201212-134751-2.png

    https://i.ibb.co/hdVH2rZ/Screenshot-20201212-175323-2.png

    Replies: @Another German Reader, @Anatoly Karlin

    For commercial reason CPR could not ignore the old gen (PS4/XO), due to 150 mio users.

    But technically they should have only released it on the new gen (PS5, XSX, XSS) & PC only.

    The old gen are completely overwhelmed. Low res, low textures, popups, lower density of NPCs/objects – but still only 15 to 25 fps.

  • @Europe Europa
    @songbird

    Poles/Eastern Europeans despite being white seem to have a more non-white character and outlook, relative to the native British any way.

    Socially they seem to gel more with the blacks and Muslims than they do with the British. Young Slavic men often seem to imitate and style themselves after ghetto black "gangstas", presumably because they see them as a model of masculinity and toughness.

    Replies: @Blinky Bill, @Coconuts, @Dmitry

    Forum usually has a funny deference to precedency in comments.

    Someone says an unusual claim (e.g. “Poles have a non-white outlook”; “Donetsk was the worst city in Ukraine”), and the result is a tree of comments about why the statement can be true, rather than about whether the statement is true.

    If the first comment writes “Poles have a white outlook”, then there would be a discussion about why “Poles have a white outlook”.

    despite being white seem to have a more non-white character and outlook,

    Considering that Poles are European people, then the character and outlook of the population is a European one in a tautological way.

    Poland is a lower income country for European standards, and the immigration from Poland to UK is unfiltered as it is EU member.

    So what you are saying is that Pole immigrants have less “Stuff white people like” (i.e. hipster/bourgeois values) compared to English. Majority of Polish immigrants seem to be unglamorous, provincial kind of people (who go to West Europe to work as supermarket assistants, prostitutes, gangsters, hotel secretaries, carwashers, village drunks, etc). There is another proportion of immigrants who are educated professionals (doctors, pilots, scientists, engineers), but due to lack of selection in immigration, the skilled labour may be only the minority of the total immigrants.

    It’s the opposite of Russians in London, where there is no open border, and therefore difficulty of the visa system results in a selection filter for skilled labour and more educated people among Russians (investors, students, engineers, etc).

  • @Daniel Chieh
    I'm surprised that no one has started a Cybepunk 2077 comment at all. Let's first all mock our host for not completing his grand opus:

    https://mobile.twitter.com/akarlin88/status/1336796546843684864


    From what I've heard, it needs patches.

    Replies: @The Spirit of Enoch Powell

    Oh no, we got too cocky Polish bros

    •ï¿½Replies: @Another German Reader
    @The Spirit of Enoch Powell

    For commercial reason CPR could not ignore the old gen (PS4/XO), due to 150 mio users.

    But technically they should have only released it on the new gen (PS5, XSX, XSS) & PC only.

    The old gen are completely overwhelmed. Low res, low textures, popups, lower density of NPCs/objects - but still only 15 to 25 fps.
    , @Anatoly Karlin
    @The Spirit of Enoch Powell

    "Mostly positive" on steam.

    I took it for a ride (not playing yet, just seeing if my i5-4670k/RTX 2060 will handle it) and it runs just fine FWIW on recommended settings. Might be untenable in outdoor or fight scenes, I suppose.
  • Comments seem to be working again.

  • @A123
    @128

    Even the expensive, high quality fee for service translation system botch sometimes. There was a "scandal" about the U.S. shipping face masks to Israel during a shortage. This was 100% a translation problem.

    A program produced output staying that the U.S. Department of Defense, Ministry of Procurement bought the masks. The U.S. DoD does not have ministries, so the translation was obviously wrong. It was an Israeli Ministry of Procurement that bought the masks.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Daniel Chieh

    https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/11/us/politics/supreme-court-election-texas.html

    President Donald Trump called the case “the big one,” and 126 of the 196 Republicans in the House urged the court to take it. But the justices acted quickly to turn it down.

    “Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another state conducts its elections,” the court said in a brief unsigned opinion.

    Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito said the court had no authority to refuse a case filed on its original docket, where one state files to sue another. But they said the would not have granted Texas any other relief and expressed no view on any of the issues raised in the lawsuit.

    So the ruling was essentially a unanimous rejection of the Texas claims.

  • @Europe Europa
    @songbird

    Poles/Eastern Europeans despite being white seem to have a more non-white character and outlook, relative to the native British any way.

    Socially they seem to gel more with the blacks and Muslims than they do with the British. Young Slavic men often seem to imitate and style themselves after ghetto black "gangstas", presumably because they see them as a model of masculinity and toughness.

    Replies: @Blinky Bill, @Coconuts, @Dmitry

    Poles/Eastern Europeans despite being white seem to have a more non-white character and outlook, relative to the native British any way.

    It’s strange because Poland and other Eastern European nations are a lot more white (or European) demographically and culturally than the UK is at the moment. One of the things I appreciate about going to EE (usually Lithuania and Belarus) is that the feel of these places takes me back to how Britain was in the 1990s.

    My wife, when she was in her 20s and early 30s always used to prefer to talk to British boomers and older, because they had more life experiences and values in common, whereas with British millennials this was mostly not the case.

  • I’m surprised that no one has started a Cybepunk 2077 comment at all. Let’s first all mock our host for not completing his grand opus:

    https://mobile.twitter.com/akarlin88/status/1336796546843684864

    From what I’ve heard, it needs patches.

    •ï¿½Agree: Anatoly Karlin
    •ï¿½Replies: @The Spirit of Enoch Powell
    @Daniel Chieh

    Oh no, we got too cocky Polish bros

    https://i.ibb.co/wQ244w9/Screenshot-20201212-134751-2.png

    https://i.ibb.co/hdVH2rZ/Screenshot-20201212-175323-2.png

    Replies: @Another German Reader, @Anatoly Karlin
  • A123 says:
    @128
    @A123

    Well, Chinese histories are written in Classical Chinese, they are very very hard to comprehend for someone whose background is only vernacular Chinese.

    Replies: @A123

    Even the expensive, high quality fee for service translation system botch sometimes. There was a “scandal” about the U.S. shipping face masks to Israel during a shortage. This was 100% a translation problem.

    A program produced output staying that the U.S. Department of Defense, Ministry of Procurement bought the masks. The U.S. DoD does not have ministries, so the translation was obviously wrong. It was an Israeli Ministry of Procurement that bought the masks.

    PEACE 😇

    •ï¿½Replies: @Daniel Chieh
    @A123

    https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/11/us/politics/supreme-court-election-texas.html

    President Donald Trump called the case "the big one," and 126 of the 196 Republicans in the House urged the court to take it. But the justices acted quickly to turn it down.

    "Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another state conducts its elections," the court said in a brief unsigned opinion.

    Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito said the court had no authority to refuse a case filed on its original docket, where one state files to sue another. But they said the would not have granted Texas any other relief and expressed no view on any of the issues raised in the lawsuit.

    So the ruling was essentially a unanimous rejection of the Texas claims.
    �
  • @AaronB
    @Daniel Chieh

    The problem with you, Daniel, is that you are a scared animal.

    Being scared, you are preoccupied with efficiency and control, that side of life that pertains to survival.

    Being Chinese, this is not surprising. China's encounter with the West was the most terrifying event in its history. It is not surprising, that the next few generations of Chinese, will be preoccupied with that side of life that pertains to survival. The effect is long.

    That is normal and natural. Previously, life in China had grown so secure, that Chinese culture focused predominantly on making life pleasurable.

    The problem is, total security is an illusion. Rattled and shaken by your encounter with the West, you now dream of total efficiency, total control, total safety.

    But there is no still point in the storm where we can seek refuge, and life is constant risk. The challenge is, to sail skillfully with the wind, not total control.

    The problem, of course, goes well beyond China. Global elites dream of total safety, efficiency, and control.

    But such a system, is self undermining in the long term, and results in loss of the will to live and dysfunction.

    Replies: @Daniel Chieh

    The problem with you has an easy solution.

    https://www.rxlist.com/thorazine-drug.htm#dosage

    Psychotic Disorders — Increase dosage gradually until symptoms are controlled. Maximum improvement may not be seen for weeks or even months. Continue optimum dosage for 2 weeks; then gradually reduce dosage to the lowest effective maintenance level. Daily dosage of 200 mg is not unusual. Some patients require higher dosages (e.g., 800 mg daily is not uncommon in discharged mental patients).

    •ï¿½LOL: AaronB
  • @The Spirit of Enoch Powell
    @AaronB

    Dislike of the CCP is irrational, as of recently it is drifting away from its Maoist theology and there is a renaissance of ancient Chinese culture. I remember reading that the Chinese can now openly admire Chiang Kai-Shek and admit Mao did bad things, so the ideological dogmatism is going away.

    From a Jewish perspective, the only thing bad about China is that it is, like other East Asian societies impenetrable to outsiders, and they cannot control this behemoth in the making like they could with the Occidental nations. Perhaps it's support of Iran is also disconcerting.

    Replies: @A123, @AaronB

    I dont really dislike the CCP. Liking and disliking are too simplistic.

    I think the CCP may have a useful transitional role to play for China, now. What I am primarily opposing is the idea that the current CCP is an ideal form of government for all time and should be reproduced in the West, and the absurd romanticism one sees on this site, that Chinese elites “care for their prople” lol.

    I am mostly responding to the absurd and excessive admiration one sees here, because it may lead to the importation of very negative trends from China, that benefit elite exploitation of the masses, as certain people want.

    Asian societies are not as impenetrable as you think, especially the Chinese. China has had periods of great cosmopolitanism, and sees itself as an “ur-culture” that spreads its culture to others. That self image, is less tied to race, to blood and soil.

    Today, China is quite racist, but China is still recovering from its encounter with the West, so nothing about it is very normal now.

    If large numbers of Jews settled in China, I am sure they would become a prosperous community with strong ties to the elite, like they have everywhere. Jews strive to become the best exemplars of whatever the prestige ideology of their host society is – in the West, it is Leftism. In China, it would be whatever is popular there.

    Contrary to the culture of critique nonsense.

    The West, was traditionally more closed to outsiders than China, and had particular animus towards Jews. If Jews could still make it in the West, then can make it anywhere.

    Anyways, I dont think there will be any large scale movement of Jews, or anyone, to China, as the West will continue to be the world’s powerhouse of creativity and quality, and ambitious people will continue to prefer it.

  • A123 says:
    @The Spirit of Enoch Powell
    @AaronB

    Dislike of the CCP is irrational, as of recently it is drifting away from its Maoist theology and there is a renaissance of ancient Chinese culture. I remember reading that the Chinese can now openly admire Chiang Kai-Shek and admit Mao did bad things, so the ideological dogmatism is going away.

    From a Jewish perspective, the only thing bad about China is that it is, like other East Asian societies impenetrable to outsiders, and they cannot control this behemoth in the making like they could with the Occidental nations. Perhaps it's support of Iran is also disconcerting.

    Replies: @A123, @AaronB

    Dislike of the CCP is irrational, as of recently it is drifting away from its Maoist theology and there is a renaissance of ancient Chinese culture.

    The CCP believes that it can control the U.S. by controlling Wall Street. As a corollary to that endevaour, the CCP wants to make Wall Street more powerful at controlling Americans. Thus:

    — Those who dislike SJW Globalism, dislike Wall Street Banks
    — Those who dislike Wall Street Banks, dislike CCP Elites.

    Or, to put it more simply:

    — There are many reasons to like China and the Chinese people.
    — There are very few reasons to like authoritarian CCP Elites.

    Though I do give the CCP praise for their handling of non-Chinese occupiers in Western China.

    PEACE 😇

  • @AaronB
    @The Spirit of Enoch Powell

    Interesting video.

    Its amusing to see Chinese still think Jews have big noses lol :) If only we could be identified so easily!

    There is no special animosity among American Jews to China. Opinion is divided in the usual way, although there is probably a positive attitude to the Chinese ethny.

    Israel has no problem with China, and is only limited in its ties with China by deference to America. But Israel is always pragmatic, as it must be. Israel had warm relations with South Africa, aa well.

    Its funny, but in the most hilarious, shameless, "let's you and him fight" ploy, Ron Unz tried to act as if Israel is the primary enemy of China, because it controls America, etc, etc :) I got a huge kick out of that. Nice try, Ron :) I don't think Chinese are stupid enough to adopt your petty obsessions.

    My own anti CCP stance is driven by my liberalism, and has nothing to do with being Jewish.

    But for many, there does seem to be a connection there. The antisemites seem to love and admire the CCP, but I attribute that to a spiritual kinship - "asshole" type people stick together. Thats why the antisemites like Iran and the CCP - assoholes admire each other.

    I have to stop calling it China- what I dislike, is the CCP, not China.

    Replies: @The Spirit of Enoch Powell, @Dmitry

    Dislike of the CCP is irrational, as of recently it is drifting away from its Maoist theology and there is a renaissance of ancient Chinese culture. I remember reading that the Chinese can now openly admire Chiang Kai-Shek and admit Mao did bad things, so the ideological dogmatism is going away.

    From a Jewish perspective, the only thing bad about China is that it is, like other East Asian societies impenetrable to outsiders, and they cannot control this behemoth in the making like they could with the Occidental nations. Perhaps it’s support of Iran is also disconcerting.

    •ï¿½Replies: @A123
    @The Spirit of Enoch Powell


    Dislike of the CCP is irrational, as of recently it is drifting away from its Maoist theology and there is a renaissance of ancient Chinese culture.
    �
    The CCP believes that it can control the U.S. by controlling Wall Street. As a corollary to that endevaour, the CCP wants to make Wall Street more powerful at controlling Americans. Thus:

    -- Those who dislike SJW Globalism, dislike Wall Street Banks
    -- Those who dislike Wall Street Banks, dislike CCP Elites.

    Or, to put it more simply:

    -- There are many reasons to like China and the Chinese people.
    -- There are very few reasons to like authoritarian CCP Elites.

    Though I do give the CCP praise for their handling of non-Chinese occupiers in Western China.

    PEACE 😇
    , @AaronB
    @The Spirit of Enoch Powell

    I dont really dislike the CCP. Liking and disliking are too simplistic.

    I think the CCP may have a useful transitional role to play for China, now. What I am primarily opposing is the idea that the current CCP is an ideal form of government for all time and should be reproduced in the West, and the absurd romanticism one sees on this site, that Chinese elites "care for their prople" lol.

    I am mostly responding to the absurd and excessive admiration one sees here, because it may lead to the importation of very negative trends from China, that benefit elite exploitation of the masses, as certain people want.

    Asian societies are not as impenetrable as you think, especially the Chinese. China has had periods of great cosmopolitanism, and sees itself as an "ur-culture" that spreads its culture to others. That self image, is less tied to race, to blood and soil.

    Today, China is quite racist, but China is still recovering from its encounter with the West, so nothing about it is very normal now.

    If large numbers of Jews settled in China, I am sure they would become a prosperous community with strong ties to the elite, like they have everywhere. Jews strive to become the best exemplars of whatever the prestige ideology of their host society is - in the West, it is Leftism. In China, it would be whatever is popular there.

    Contrary to the culture of critique nonsense.

    The West, was traditionally more closed to outsiders than China, and had particular animus towards Jews. If Jews could still make it in the West, then can make it anywhere.

    Anyways, I dont think there will be any large scale movement of Jews, or anyone, to China, as the West will continue to be the world's powerhouse of creativity and quality, and ambitious people will continue to prefer it.
  • @songbird
    @The Spirit of Enoch Powell

    There might be a distortion here, if, as can probably be assumed, natives are less urban and so less exposed to blacks. Perhaps, Poles and other non-British whites would choose to segregate in white British cities, if that were an option.

    Replies: @The Spirit of Enoch Powell, @Europe Europa

    Eastern Europeans seem quite widely dispersed across the UK though, not just in major cities.

    Native British people are probably more likely to live in rural areas than white immigrants, but overall native British people are quite heavily urbanised by Western standards.

  • @(((They))) Live
    @mal

    IMO the Falcon Heavy was delayed because as the Merlin engine evolved and got more powerful there was less need for the Heavy, this won't happen with Starship, Musk wants to use it to launch Starlink satellites, 400 Sarlink sats on Starship is far better than 60 on a Falcon 9, cheaper too since they won't be losing a second stage

    Replies: @mal

    You are correct on the Starlink, and other automatic stuff but they will run into problems with human certs. That’s US bureaucracy for you.

    That said, I hope I’m wrong and you are correct across the board. 🙂

  • @mal
    @(((They))) LIve

    Quick primer on space engineering programs - if Head Honcho promises some deadline, look who he is and follow this schedule:

    1. Elon Musk. Add 5 years to promised timeline (he promised Heavy by like 2013, similar story with Crew Dragon).

    2. Other NASA subcontractors (Boeing etc). Add 10 years.

    3. Russians. Add 15 years.*

    I am a fan of Elon Musk and I think he is a good rocketeer, but I'm also a realist.

    *This may sound like I knock on the Russians but I really dont. I think Russians do pretty good for the budget, and they do have a strategic vision with their TEM project, which I approve of very much, more so than Musks' rockets. People like to dump on Rogozin, but since he became a head of Roscosmos, Russians had a near perfect launch record. Prior to Rogozin, Russians would blow up at least one rocket a year. Now, personally, I would prefer more blow ups and more launches, but I'm not the one paying payload insurance, so I guess my opinion doesn't matter that much in this case.

    Replies: @(((They))) Live

    IMO the Falcon Heavy was delayed because as the Merlin engine evolved and got more powerful there was less need for the Heavy, this won’t happen with Starship, Musk wants to use it to launch Starlink satellites, 400 Sarlink sats on Starship is far better than 60 on a Falcon 9, cheaper too since they won’t be losing a second stage

    •ï¿½Replies: @mal
    @(((They))) Live

    You are correct on the Starlink, and other automatic stuff but they will run into problems with human certs. That's US bureaucracy for you.

    That said, I hope I'm wrong and you are correct across the board. :)