');
The Unz Review •ï¿½An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library •ï¿½B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


�Remember My InformationWhy?
�Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Alastair Crooke Anatoly Karlin Andrew Anglin Andrew Joyce Audacious Epigone Boyd D. Cathey C.J. Hopkins E. Michael Jones Eric Margolis Eric Striker Fred Reed Gilad Atzmon Godfree Roberts Gregory Hood Guillaume Durocher Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir James Kirkpatrick James Thompson Jared Taylor John Derbyshire Jonathan Cook Jung-Freud Karlin Community Kevin Barrett Kevin MacDonald Lance Welton Larry Romanoff Laurent Guyénot Linh Dinh Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Kersey Pepe Escobar Peter Frost Philip Giraldi Razib Khan Ron Unz Steve Sailer The Saker Tobias Langdon Trevor Lynch A. Graham A. J. Smuskiewicz A Southerner Academic Research Group UK Staff Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Agha Hussain Ahmad Al Khaled Ahmet Öncü Alain De Benoist Alan Macleod Albemarle Man Alex Graham Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alexander Jacob Alexander Wolfheze Alfred McCoy Alison Weir Allan Wall Allegra Harpootlian Amalric De Droevig Ambrose Kane Amr Abozeid Anand Gopal Anastasia Katz Andre Damon Andre Vltchek Andreas Canetti Andrei Martyanov Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andrew Hamilton Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Napolitano Andrew S. Fischer Andy Kroll Angie Saxon Ann Jones Anna Tolstoyevskaya Anne Wilson Smith Anonymous Anonymous American Anonymous Attorney Anonymous Occidental Anthony Boehm Anthony Bryan Anthony DiMaggio Tony Hall Antiwar Staff Antonius Aquinas Antony C. Black Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor AudaciousEpigone Augustin Goland Austen Layard Ava Muhammad Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Kissin Barry Lando Barton Cockey Beau Albrecht Belle Chesler Ben Fountain Ben Freeman Ben Sullivan Benjamin Villaroel Bernard M. Smith Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Blake Archer Williams Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Book Brad Griffin Bradley Moore Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brett Wilkins Brian Dew Brian McGlinchey Brian R. Wright Brittany Smith C.D. Corax Cara Marianna Carl Boggs Carl Horowitz Carolyn Yeager Cat McGuire Catherine Crump César Keller Chalmers Johnson Chanda Chisala Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlie O'Neill Charlottesville Survivor Chase Madar Chauke Stephan Filho Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Chris Woltermann Christian Appy Christophe Dolbeau Christopher DeGroot Christopher Donovan Christopher Ketcham Chuck Spinney Civus Non Nequissimus CODOH Editors Coleen Rowley Colin Liddell Cooper Sterling Craig Murray Cynthia Chung D.F. Mulder Dahr Jamail Dakota Witness Dan E. Phillips Dan Sanchez Daniel Barge Daniel McAdams Daniel Vinyard Danny Sjursen Dave Chambers Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Boyajian David Bromwich David Chibo David Chu David Gordon David Haggith David Irving David L. McNaron David Lorimer David Martin David North David Stockman David Vine David Walsh David William Pear David Yorkshire Dean Baker Declan Hayes Dennis Dale Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Diego Ramos Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Dmitriy Kalyagin Donald Thoresen Alan Sabrosky Dr. Ejaz Akram Dr. Ridgely Abdul Mu’min Muhammad Dries Van Langenhove Eamonn Fingleton Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Edward Curtin Edward Dutton Egbert Dijkstra Egor Kholmogorov Ekaterina Blinova Ellen Brown Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Emil Kirkegaard Emilio García Gómez Emma Goldman Enzo Porter Eric Draitser Eric Paulson Eric Peters Eric Rasmusen Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Gant Eugene Girin Eugene Kusmiak Eve Mykytyn F. Roger Devlin Fadi Abu Shammalah Fantine Gardinier Federale Fenster Fergus Hodgson Finian Cunningham The First Millennium Revisionist Fordham T. Smith Former Agent Forum Francis Goumain Frank Tipler Franklin Lamb Franklin Stahl Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Gary Corseri Gary Heavin Gary North Gary Younge Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Galloway George Koo George Mackenzie George Szamuely Georgianne Nienaber Gilbert Cavanaugh Gilbert Doctorow Giles Corey Glen K. Allen Glenn Greenwald A. Beaujean Agnostic Alex B. Amnestic Arcane Asher Bb Bbartlog Ben G Birch Barlow Canton ChairmanK Chrisg Coffee Mug Darth Quixote David David B David Boxenhorn DavidB Diana Dkane DMI Dobeln Duende Dylan Ericlien Fly Gcochran Godless Grady Herrick Jake & Kara Jason Collins Jason Malloy Jason�s Jeet Jemima Joel John Emerson John Quiggin JP Kele Kjmtchl Mark Martin Matoko Kusanagi Matt Matt McIntosh Michael Vassar Miko Ml Ole P-ter Piccolino Rosko Schizmatic Scorpius Suman TangoMan The Theresa Thorfinn Thrasymachus Wintz Gonzalo Lira Graham Seibert Grant M. Dahl Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Greg Klein Gregg Stanley Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Conte Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Gunnar Alfredsson Gustavo Arellano Hank Johnson Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Hans Vogel Harri Honkanen Heiner Rindermann Henry Cockburn Hewitt E. Moore Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Howe Abbot-Hiss Hubert Collins Hugh Kennedy Hugh McInnish Hugh Moriarty Hugo Dionísio Hunter DeRensis Hunter Wallace Huntley Haverstock Ian Fantom Igor Shafarevich Ira Chernus Ivan Kesić J. Alfred Powell J.B. Clark J.D. Gore J. Ricardo Martins Jacek Szela Jack Antonio Jack Dalton Jack Kerwick Jack Krak Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen Jake Bowyer James Bovard James Carroll James Carson Harrington James Chang James Dunphy James Durso James Edwards James Fulford James Gillespie James Hanna James J. O'Meara James K. Galbraith James Karlsson James Lawrence James Petras Jane Lazarre Jane Weir Janice Kortkamp Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Cannon Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jayant Bhandari JayMan Jean Bricmont Jean Marois Jean Ranc Jef Costello Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey D. Sachs Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jesse Mossman JHR Writers Jim Daniel Jim Fetzer Jim Goad Jim Kavanagh Jim Smith JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Dackman Joe Lauria Joel S. Hirschhorn Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Harrison Sims John Helmer John Hill John Huss John J. Mearsheimer John Jackson John Kiriakou John Macdonald John Morgan John Patterson John Leonard John Pilger John Q. Publius John Rand John Reid John Ryan John Scales Avery John Siman John Stauber John T. Kelly John Taylor John Titus John Tremain John V. Walsh John Wear John Williams Jon Else Jon Entine Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Revusky Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Sawyer Jonathan Schell Jordan Henderson Jordan Steiner Joseph Kay Joseph Kishore Joseph Sobran Josephus Tiberius Josh Neal Jeshurun Tsarfat Juan Cole Judith Coburn Julian Bradford Julian Macfarlane K.J. Noh Kacey Gunther Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Karl Haemers Karl Nemmersdorf Karl Thorburn Kees Van Der Pijl Keith Woods Kelley Vlahos Kenn Gividen Kenneth Vinther Kerry Bolton Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin Michael Grace Kevin Rothrock Kevin Sullivan Kevin Zeese Kshama Sawant Larry C. Johnson Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Lawrence Erickson Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Leonard C. Goodman Leonard R. Jaffee Liam Cosgrove Lidia Misnik Lilith Powell Linda Preston Lipton Matthews Liv Heide Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett Louis Farrakhan Lydia Brimelow M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maciej Pieczyński Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marco De Wit Marcus Alethia Marcus Apostate Marcus Cicero Marcus Devonshire Margaret Flowers Margot Metroland Marian Evans Mark Allen Mark Bratchikov-Pogrebisskiy Mark Crispin Miller Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Gullick Mark H. Gaffney Mark Lu Mark Perry Mark Weber Marshall Yeats Martin Jay Martin K. O'Toole Martin Webster Martin Witkerk Mary Phagan-Kean Matt Cockerill Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Caldwell Matthew Ehret Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max Jones Max North Max Parry Max West Maya Schenwar Merlin Miller Metallicman Michael A. Roberts Michael Averko Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Hoffman Michael Masterson Michael Quinn Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Michelle Malkin Miko Peled Mnar Muhawesh Moon Landing Skeptic Morgan Jones Morris V. De Camp Mr. Anti-Humbug Muhammed Abu Murray Polner N. Joseph Potts Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Nathan Cofnas Nathan Doyle Ned Stark Neil Kumar Nelson Rosit Nicholas R. Jeelvy Nicholas Stix Nick Griffin Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Nicolás Palacios Navarro Nils Van Der Vegte Noam Chomsky NOI Research Group Nomi Prins Norman Finkelstein Norman Solomon OldMicrobiologist Oliver Boyd-Barrett Oliver Williams Oscar Grau P.J. Collins Pádraic O'Bannon Patrice Greanville Patrick Armstrong Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Patrick Lawrence Patrick Martin Patrick McDermott Patrick Whittle Paul Bennett Paul Cochrane Paul De Rooij Paul Edwards Paul Engler Paul Gottfried Paul Larudee Paul Mitchell Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Paul Souvestre Paul Tripp Pedro De Alvarado Peter Baggins Ph.D. Peter Bradley Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Lee Peter Van Buren Philip Kraske Philip Weiss Pierre M. Sprey Pierre Simon Povl H. Riis-Knudsen Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Qasem Soleimani Rachel Marsden Raches Radhika Desai Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ralph Raico Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Ramzy Baroud Randy Shields Raul Diego Ray McGovern Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Reginald De Chantillon Rémi Tremblay Rev. Matthew Littlefield Ricardo Duchesne Richard Cook Richard Falk Richard Foley Richard Galustian Richard Houck Richard Hugus Richard Knight Richard Krushnic Richard McCulloch Richard Silverstein Richard Solomon Rick Shenkman Rick Sterling Rita Rozhkova Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Debrus Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Fisk Robert Hampton Robert Henderson Robert Inlakesh Robert LaFlamme Robert Lindsay Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Stark Robert Stevens Robert Trivers Robert Wallace Robert Weissberg Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Rolo Slavskiy Romana Rubeo Romanized Visigoth Ron Paul Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning RT Staff Ruuben Kaalep Ryan Andrews Ryan Dawson Sabri Öncü Salim Mansur Sam Dickson Sam Francis Sam Husseini Sayed Hasan Scot Olmstead Scott Howard Scott Ritter Servando Gonzalez Sharmine Narwani Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Sidney James Sietze Bosman Sigurd Kristensen Sinclair Jenkins Southfront Editor Spencer Davenport Spencer J. Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen F. Cohen Stephen J. Rossi Stephen J. Sniegoski Stephen Paul Foster Sterling Anderson Steve Fraser Steve Keen Steve Penfield Steven Farron Steven Yates Subhankar Banerjee Susan Southard Sydney Schanberg Talia Mullin Tanya Golash-Boza Taxi Taylor McClain Taylor Young Ted O'Keefe Ted Rall The Crew The Zman Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas A. Fudge Thomas Anderson Thomas Hales Thomas Dalton Thomas Ertl Thomas Frank Thomas Hales Thomas Jackson Thomas O. Meehan Thomas Steuben Thomas Zaja Thorsten J. Pattberg Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Timothy Vorgenss Timur Fomenko Tingba Muhammad Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Engelhardt Tom Mysiewicz Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Torin Murphy Tracy Rosenberg Travis LeBlanc Vernon Thorpe Virginia Dare Vito Klein Vladimir Brovkin Vladimir Putin Vladislav Krasnov Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walt King Walter E. Block Warren Balogh Washington Watcher Washington Watcher II Wayne Allensworth Wei Ling Chua Wesley Muhammad White Man Faculty Whitney Webb Wilhelm Kriessmann Wilhem Ivorsson Will Jones Will Offensicht William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Wyatt Peterson Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen Yaroslav Podvolotskiy Yvonne Lorenzo Zhores Medvedev
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2020 Election Academia American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Benjamin Netanyahu Black Crime Black Lives Matter Blacks Britain Censorship China China/America Conspiracy Theories Covid Culture/Society Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy Gaza Hamas History Holocaust Ideology Immigration IQ Iran Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Joe Biden NATO Nazi Germany Neocons Open Thread Political Correctness Race/Ethnicity Russia Science Syria Ukraine Vladimir Putin World War II 汪精衛 100% Jussie-free Content 1984 2008 Election 2012 Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2022 Election 2024 Election 23andMe 9/11 9/11 Commission Report Abortion Abraham Lincoln Abu Mehdi Muhandas Achievement Gap ACLU Acting White Adam Schiff Addiction ADL Admin Administration Admixture Adolf Hitler Advertising AfD Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Age Age Of Malthusian Industrialism Agriculture AI AIPAC Air Force Aircraft Carriers Airlines Airports Al Jazeera Al Qaeda Al-Shifa Alain Soral Alan Clemmons Alan Dershowitz Albania Albert Einstein Albion's Seed Alcoholism Alejandro Mayorkas Alex Jones Alexander Dugin Alexander Vindman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Alexei Navalny Algeria Ali Dawabsheh Alien And Sedition Acts Alison Nathan Alt Right Altruism Amazon Amazon.com America America First American Civil War American Dream American History American Indians American Israel Public Affairs Committee American Jews American Left American Nations American Nations American Presidents American Prisons American Renaissance Amerindians Amish Amnesty Amnesty International Amos Hochstein Amy Klobuchar Amygdala Anarchism Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Greece Ancient Rome Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Bacevich Andrew Sullivan Andrew Yang Anglo-America Anglo-imperialism Anglo-Saxons Anglos Anglosphere Angola Animal IQ Animal Rights Wackos Animals Ann Coulter Anne Frank Anthony Blinken Anthony Fauci Anthrax Anthropology Anti-Defamation League Anti-Gentilism Anti-Semites Anti-Vaccination Anti-Vaxx Anti-white Animus Antifa Antifeminism Antiracism Antisemitism Antisemitism Awareness Act Antisocial Behavior Antizionism Antony Blinken Apartheid Apartheid Israel Apollo's Ascent Appalachia Apple Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaeogenetics Archaeology Archaic DNA Architecture Arctic Arctic Sea Ice Melting Argentina Ariel Sharon Armageddon War Armenia Armenian Genocide Army Arnold Schwarzenegger Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Jensen Arthur Lichte Artificial Intelligence Arts/Letters Aryans Aryeh Lightstone Ash Carter Ashkenazi Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians Assassination Assassinations Assimilation Atheism Atlanta AUMF Auschwitz Australia Australian Aboriginals Autism Automation Avril Haines Ayn Rand Azerbaijan Azov Brigade Babes And Hunks Baby Gap Balfour Declaration Balkans Balochistan Baltics Baltimore Riots Banjamin Netanyahu Banking Industry Banking System Banks #BanTheADL Barack Obama Baseball Statistics Bashar Al-Assad Basketball #BasketOfDeplorables BBC BDS BDS Movement Beauty Beethoven Behavior Genetics Behavioral Genetics Bela Belarus Belgium Belgrade Embassy Bombing Ben Cardin Ben Hodges Ben Rhodes Ben Shapiro Ben Stiller Benny Gantz Bernard Henri-Levy Bernie Sanders Betsy DeVos Betty McCollum Bezalel Smotrich Bezalel Yoel Smotrich Biden BigPost Bilateral Relations Bilingual Education Bill Clinton Bill De Blasio Bill Gates Bill Kristol Bill Maher Bill Of Rights Billionaires Billy Graham Bioethics Biology Bioweapons Birmingham Birth Rate Bitcoin Black Community Black History Month Black Muslims Black Panthers Black People Black Slavery BlackLivesMatter BlackRock Blake Masters Blank Slatism BLM Blog Blogging Blogosphere Blond Hair Blood Libel Blue Eyes Boasian Anthropology Boeing Boers Bolshevik Revolution Bolshevik Russia Books Boomers Border Wall Boris Johnson Bosnia Boycott Divest And Sanction Brain Drain Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Bret Stephens Brett McGurk Bretton Woods Brexit Brezhnev Bri Brian Mast BRICs Brighter Brains British Empire British Labour Party British Politics Buddhism Build The Wall Bulldog Bush Business Byzantine Caitlin Johnstone California Californication Camp Of The Saints Canada #Cancel2022WorldCupinQatar Cancer Candace Owens Capitalism Carl Von Clausewitz Carlos Slim Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Cars Carthaginians Catalonia Catholic Church Catholicism Catholics Cats Caucasus CDC Ceasefire Cecil Rhodes Census Central Asia Central Intelligence Agency Chanda Chisala Chaos And Order Charles De Gaulle Charles Manson Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charlie Hebdo Charlottesville Checheniest Chechen Of Them All Chechens Chechnya Chernobyl Chetty Chicago Chicagoization Chicken Hut Child Abuse Children Chile China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese IQ Chinese Language Christian Zionists Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Christopher Wray Chuck Schumer CIA Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil Rights Movement Civil War Civilization Clannishness Clash Of Civilizations Class Classical Antiquity Classical History Classical Music Clayton County Climate Climate Change Clint Eastwood Clintons Coal Coalition Of The Fringes Cognitive Elitism Cognitive Science Cold Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Powell Colin Woodard College Admission College Football Colonialism Color Revolution Columbia University Columbus Comic Books Communism Computers Confederacy Confederate Flag Congress Conquistador-American Conservatism Conservative Movement Conservatives Conspiracy Theory Constantinople Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumerism Controversial Book Convergence Core Article Cornel West Corona Corporatism Corruption COTW Counterpunch Country Music Cousin Marriage Cover Story COVID-19 Craig Murray Creationism Crime Crimea Crispr Critical Race Theory Cruise Missiles Crusades Crying Among The Farmland Cryptocurrency Ctrl-Left Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckery Cuckservatism Cuckservative CUFI Cuisine Cultural Marxism Cultural Revolution Culture Culture War Curfew Czars Czech Republic DACA Daily Data Dump Dallas Shooting Damnatio Memoriae Dan Bilzarian Danny Danon Daren Acemoglu Darwinism Darya Dugina Data Data Analysis Dave Chappelle David Bazelon David Brog David Friedman David Frum David Irving David Lynch David Petraeus Davide Piffer Davos Death Of The West Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Deborah Lipstadt Debt Debt Jubilee Decadence Deep State Deficits Degeneracy Democracy Democratic Party Demograhics Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denmark Dennis Ross Department Of Homeland Security Deplatforming Derek Chauvin Detroit Development Dick Cheney Diet Digital Yuan Dinesh D'Souza Discrimination Disease Disinformation Disney Disparate Impact Dissent Dissidence Diversity Diversity Before Diversity Diversity Pokemon Points Divorce DNA Dogs Dollar Domestic Surveillance Domestic Terrorism Doomsday Clock Dostoevsky Doug Emhoff Doug Feith Dresden Drone War Drones Drug Laws Drugs Duterte Dysgenic Dystopia E. Michael Jones E. O. Wilson East Asia East Asian Exception East Asians East Turkestan Eastern Europe Ebrahim Raisi Economic Development Economic History Economic Sanctions Economy Ecuador Edmund Burke Edmund Burke Foundation Education Edward Snowden Effective Altruism Effortpost Efraim Zurofff Egor Kholmogorov Egypt Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2020 Election Fraud Elections Electric Cars Eli Rosenbaum Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elise Stefanik Elites Elizabeth Holmes Elizabeth Warren Elliot Abrams Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emmanuel Macron Emmett Till Employment Energy England Entertainment Environment Environmentalism Epidemiology Equality Erdogan Eretz Israel Eric Zemmour Ernest Hemingway Espionage Espionage Act Estonia Ethics Ethics And Morals Ethiopia Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity Ethnocentricty EU Eugene Debs Eugenics Eurabia Eurasia Euro Europe European Genetics European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Genetics Evolutionary Psychology Existential Risks Eye Color Face Shape Facebook Faces Fake News False Flag Attack Family Family Systems Fantasy FARA Farmers Fascism Fast Food FBI FDA FDD Federal Reserve Feminism Ferguson Ferguson Shooting Fermi Paradox Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates FIFA Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Finland Finn Baiting Finns First Amendment FISA Fitness Flash Mobs Flight From White Floyd Riots 2020 Fluctuarius Argenteus Flynn Effect Food Football For Fun Forecasts Foreign Agents Registration Act Foreign Policy Fourth Amendment Fox News France Francesca Albanese Frank Salter Frankfurt School Franklin D. Roosevelt Franz Boas Fraud Freakonomics Fred Kagan Free Market Free Speech Free Trade Freedom Of Speech Freedom French Revolution Friedrich Karl Berger Friends Of The Israel Defense Forces Frivolty Frontlash Furkan Dogan Future Futurism G20 Gambling Game Game Of Thrones Gavin McInnes Gavin Newsom Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians GDP Gen Z Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Equality Gender Reassignment Gene-Culture Coevolution Genealogy General Intelligence General Motors Generation Z Generational Gap Genes Genetic Diversity Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Genghis Khan Genocide Genocide Convention Genomics Gentrification Geography Geopolitics George Floyd George Galloway George Patton George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush Georgia Germans Germany Ghislaine Maxwell Gilad Atzmon Gina Peddy Giorgia Meloni Gladwell Glenn Greenwald Global Warming Globalism Globalization Globo-Homo God Gold Golf Gonzalo Lira Google Government Government Debt Government Overreach Government Spending Government Surveillance Government Waste Goyim Grant Smith Graphs Great Bifurcation Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Powers Great Replacement #GreatWhiteDefendantPrivilege Greece Greeks Greg Cochran Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Greta Thunberg Grooming Group Intelligence Group Selection GSS Guardian Guest Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns Guy Swan GWAS Gypsies H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Haiti Hajnal Line Halloween HammerHate Hannibal Procedure Happening Happiness Harvard Harvard University Harvey Weinstein Hassan Nasrallah Hate Crimes Fraud Hoax Hate Hoaxes Hate Speech Hbd Hbd Chick Health Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Hegira Height Henry Harpending Henry Kissinger Hereditary Heredity Heritability Hezbollah High Speed Rail Hillary Clinton Hindu Caste System Hindus Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanics Historical Genetics History Of Science Hitler HIV/AIDS Hoax Holland Hollywood Holocaust Denial Holocaust Deniers Holy Roman Empire Homelessness Homicide Homicide Rate Homomania Homosexuality Hong Kong Houellebecq Housing Houthis Howard Kohr Huawei Hubbert's Peak Huddled Masses Huey Newton Hug Thug Human Achievement Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Evolutionary Genetics Human Evolutionary Genomics Human Genetics Human Genomics Human Rights Human Rights Watch Humor Hungary Hunt For The Great White Defendant Hunter Biden Hunter-Gatherers I.F. Stone I.Q. I.Q. Genomics #IBelieveInHavenMonahan ICC Icj Ideas Identity Ideology And Worldview IDF Idiocracy Igbo Igor Shafarevich Ilan Pappe Ilhan Omar Illegal Immigration Ilyushin IMF Impeachment Imperialism Imran Awan Inbreeding Income India Indian IQ Indians Individualism Indo-Europeans Indonesia Inequality Inflation Intelligence Intelligence Agencies Intelligent Design International International Affairs International Comparisons International Court Of Justice International Criminal Court International Relations Internet Interracial Marriage Interracism Intersectionality Intifada Intra-Racism Intraracism Invade Invite In Hock Invade The World Invite The World Iosef Stalin Iosif Stalin Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iranian Nuclear Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Irish Is Love Colorblind Isaac Herzog ISIS Islam Islamic Jihad Islamic State Islamism Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Bonds Israel Defense Force Israel Defense Forces Israel Separation Wall Israeli Occupation IT Italy Itamar Ben-Gvir It's Okay To Be White Ivanka Ivy League J Street Jacky Rosen Jair Bolsonaro Jake Sullivan Jake Tapper Jamal Khashoggi James Angleton James B. Watson James Clapper James Comey James Forrestal James Jeffrey James Mattis James Watson Janet Yellen Janice Yellen Japan Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Greenblatt JASTA JCPOA JD Vance Jeb Bush Jeffrey Epstein Jeffrey Goldberg Jeffrey Sachs Jen Psaki Jennifer Rubin Jens Stoltenberg Jeremy Corbyn Jerry Seinfeld Jerusalem Jerusalem Post Jesuits Jesus Jesus Christ Jewish Genetics Jewish History Jewish Intellectuals Jewish Power Jewish Power Party Jewish Supremacism JFK Assassination JFK Jr. Jihadis Jill Stein Jimmy Carter Jingoism JINSA Joe Lieberman Joe Rogan John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John F. Kennedy John Hagee John Hawks John Kirby John Kiriakou John McCain John McLaughlin John Mearsheimer Joker Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Greenblatt Jonathan Pollard Jordan Peterson Joseph Kennedy Joseph McCarthy Josh Gottheimer Josh Paul Journalism Judaism Judea Judge George Daniels Judicial System Julian Assange Jussie Smollett Justice Justin Trudeau Kaboom Kahanists Kaiser Wilhelm Kamala Harris Kamala On Her Knees Kanye West Karabakh War 2020 Karen Kwiatkowski Karine Jean-Pierre Kashmir Kata'ib Hezbollah Kay Bailey Hutchison Kazakhstan Keir Starmer Kenneth Marcus Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Williamson Khazars Khrushchev Kids Kim Jong Un Kinship Kkk KKKrazy Glue Of The Coalition Of The Fringes Knesset Kompromat Korea Korean War Kosovo Kris Kobach Kristi Noem Ku Klux Klan Kubrick Kurds Kushner Foundation Kyle Rittenhouse Kyrie Irving Language Laos Larry C. Johnson Late Obama Age Collapse Latin America Latinos Laura Loomer Law Lawfare LDNR Lead Poisoning Leahy Amendments Leahy Law Lebanon Lee Kuan Yew Leftism Lenin Leo Frank Leo Strauss Let's Talk About My Hair LGBT LGBTI Liberal Opposition Liberal Whites Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libya Light Skin Preference Lindsey Graham Linguistics Literacy Literature Lithuania Litvinenko Living Standards Liz Cheney Liz Truss Lloyd Austin Localism long-range-missile-defense Longevity Looting Lord Of The Rings Lorde Loudoun County Louis Farrakhan Love And Marriage Low-fat Lukashenko Lula Lyndon B Johnson Lyndon Johnson Madeleine Albright Mafia MAGA Magnitsky Act Malaysia Malaysian Airlines MH17 Manosphere Manufacturing Mao Zedong Map Marco Rubio Maria Butina Marijuana Marine Le Pen Marjorie Taylor Greene Mark Milley Mark Steyn Mark Warner Marriage Martin Luther King Martin Scorsese Marvel Marx Marxism Masculinity Mass Shootings Mate Choice Mathematics Mathilde Krim Matt Gaetz Max Boot Max Weber Maxine Waters Mayans McCain McCain/POW McDonald's Meat Media Media Bias Medicine Medieval Christianity Medieval Russia Mediterranean Diet Medvedev Megan McCain Meghan Markle Mein Obama MEK Mel Gibson Men With Gold Chains Meng Wanzhou Mental Health Mental Illness Mental Traits Meritocracy Merkel Merkel Youth Merkel's Boner Merrick Garland Mexico MH 17 MI-6 Michael Bloomberg Michael Collins PIper Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Michael Jackson Michael Lind Michael McFaul Michael Moore Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michelle Goldberg Michelle Ma Belle Michelle Obama Microaggressions Middle Ages Middle East Migration Mike Huckabee Mike Johnson Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mike Waltz Mikhael Gorbachev Miles Mathis Militarized Police Military Military Analysis Military Budget Military History Military Spending Military Technology Millennials Milner Group Minimum Wage Minneapolis Minorities Miriam Adelson Miscellaneous Misdreavus Mishima Missile Defense Mitch McConnell Mitt Romney Mixed-Race MK-Ultra Mohammed Bin Salman Monarchy Mondoweiss Money Mongolia Mongols Monkeypox Monogamy Moon Landing Hoax Moon Landings Moore's Law Morality Mormonism Mormons Mortality Mortgage Moscow Mossad Movies Muhammad Multiculturalism Music Muslim Ban Muslims Mussolini NAEP Naftali Bennett Nakba NAMs Nancy Pelos Nancy Pelosi Narendra Modi NASA Nation Of Hate Nation Of Islam National Assessment Of Educational Progress National Debt National Endowment For Democracy National Review National Security Strategy National Socialism National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans Natural Gas Nature Vs. Nurture Navalny Affair Navy Standards Nazis Nazism Neandertals Neanderthals Near Abroad Negrolatry Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolibs Neolithic Neoreaction Netherlands Never Again Education Act New Cold War New Dark Age New Horizon Foundation New Orleans New Silk Road New Tes New World Order New York New York City New York Times New Zealand New Zealand Shooting NFL Nicholas II Nicholas Wade Nick Eberstadt Nick Fuentes Nicolas Maduro Niger Nigeria Nike Nikki Haley NIMBY Nina Jankowicz No Fly Zone Noam Chomsky Nobel Prize Nord Stream Nord Stream Pipelines Nordics Norman Braman Norman Finkelstein Norman Lear North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway Novorossiya NSA Nuclear Power Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Nuremberg Nutrition NYPD Obama Obama Presidency Obamacare Obesity Obituary Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Wall Street October Surprise Oedipus Complex OFAC Oil Oil Industry Oklahoma City Bombing Olav Scholz Old Testament Oliver Stone Olympics Open Borders OpenThread Opinion Poll Opioids Orban Organized Crime Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Orwell Osama Bin Laden OTFI Our Soldiers Speak Out Of Africa Model Paganism Pakistan Pakistani Paleoanthropology Paleocons Palestine Palestinians Palin Panhandling Papacy Paper Review Parasite Burden Parenting Parenting Paris Attacks Partly Inbred Extended Family Pat Buchanan Pathogens Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Findley Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Durov Pavel Grudinin Paypal Peace Peak Oil Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Pentagon Personal Genomics Personality Pete Buttgieg Pete Buttigieg Pete Hegseth Peter Frost Peter Thiel Peter Turchin Petro Poroshenko Pew Phil Rushton Philadelphia Philippines Philosophy Phoenicians Phyllis Randall Physiognomy Piers Morgan Pigmentation Pigs Pioneers Piracy PISA Pizzagate POC Ascendancy Podcast Poland Police Police State Polio Political Correctness Makes You Stupid Political Dissolution Political Economy Politicians Politics Polling Pollution Polygamy Polygyny Pope Francis Population Population Genetics Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Porn Pornography Portland Portugal Portuguese Post-Apocalypse Poverty Power Pramila Jayapal PRC Prediction Prescription Drugs President Joe Biden Presidential Race '08 Presidential Race '12 Presidential Race '16 Presidential Race '20 Prince Andrew Prince Harry Priti Patel Privacy Privatization Progressives Propaganda Prostitution protest Protestantism Proud Boys Psychology Psychometrics Psychopathy Public Health Public Schools Puerto Rico Puritans Putin Putin Derangement Syndrome QAnon Qassem Soleimani Qatar Quantitative Genetics Quebec Quiet Skies Quincy Institute R2P Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race/IQ Race Riots Rachel Corrie Racial Purism Racial Reality Racialism Racism Rafah Raj Shah Rand Paul Randy Fine Rap Music Rape Rashida Tlaib Rationality Ray McGovern Raymond Chandler Razib Khan Real Estate RealWorld Recep Tayyip Erdogan Red Sea Refugee Crisis #refugeeswelcome Religion Religion And Philosophy Rentier Reparations Reprint Republican Party Republicans Review Revisionism Rex Tillerson RFK Assassination Ricci Richard Dawkins Richard Goldberg Richard Grenell Richard Haas Richard Haass Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Rightwing Cinema Riots R/k Theory RMAX Robert A. Heinlein Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Ford Robert Kagan Robert Kraft Robert Maxwell Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert O'Brien Robert Reich Robots Rock Music Roe Vs. Wade Roger Waters Rolling Stone Roman Empire Romania Romanticism Rome Ron DeSantis Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rotherham Rothschilds RT International Rudy Giuliani Rush Limbaugh Russiagate Russian Demography Russian Elections 2018 Russian History Russian Media Russian Military Russian Nationalism Russian Occupation Government Russian Orthodox Church Russian Reaction Russians Russophobes Russophobia Russotriumph Ruth Bader Ginsburg Rwanda Sabrina Rubin Erdely Sacha Baron Cohen Sacklers Sailer Strategy Sailer's First Law Of Female Journalism Saint Peter Tear Down This Gate! Saint-Petersburg Salman Rushie Salt Sam Bankman-Fried Sam Francis Samantha Power Samson Option San Bernadino Massacre Sandra Beleza Sandy Hook Sapir-Whorf SAT Satanic Age Satanism Saudi Arabia Scandal Science Denialism Science Fiction Scooter Libby Scotland Scott Ritter Scrabble Sean Hannity Seattle Secession Select Post Self Determination Self Indulgence Semites Serbia Sergei Lavrov Sergei Skripal Sergey Glazyev Seth Rich Sex Sex Differences Sex Ratio At Birth Sexual Harassment Sexual Selection Sexuality Seymour Hersh Shai Masot Shakespeare Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Shared Environment Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shimon Peres Shireen Abu Akleh Shmuley Boteach Shoah Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shulamit Aloni Shurat HaDin Sigal Mandelker Sigar Pearl Mandelker Sigmund Freud Silicon Valley Singapore Single Men Single Women Sinotriumph Six Day War Sixties SJWs Skin Color Slavery Slavery Reparations Slavoj Zizek Slavs Smart Fraction Social Justice Warriors Social Media Social Science Socialism Society Sociobiology Sociology Sodium Solzhenitsyn Somalia Sotomayor South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea Southeast Asia Soviet History Soviet Union Sovok Space Space Exploration Space Program Spain Spanish Spanish River High School SPLC Sport Sports Srebrenica St Petersburg International Economic Forum Stabby Somali Staffan Stage Stalinism Standardized Tests Star Trek Star Wars Starvation Comparisons State Department Statistics Statue Of Liberty Steny Hoyer Stephen Cohen Stephen Colbert Stephen Harper Stephen Jay Gould Stephen Townsend Stereotypes Steroids Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steven Pinker Strait Of Hormuz Strategic Ambiguity Stuart Levey Stuart Seldowitz Student Debt Stuff White People Like Sub-replacement Fertility Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subhas Chandra Bose Subprime Mortgage Crisis Suburb Suella Braverman Sugar Suicide Superintelligence Supreme Court Susan Glasser Svidomy Sweden Switzerland Symington Amendment Syrian Civil War Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Take Action Taliban Talmud Tatars Taxation Taxes Tea Party Technical Considerations Technology Ted Cruz Telegram Television Terrorism Terrorists Terry McAuliffe Tesla Testing Testosterone Tests Texas THAAD Thailand The 10/7 Project The AK The American Conservative The Bell Curve The Bible The Black Autumn The Cathedral The Confederacy The Constitution The Eight Banditos The Family The Free World The Great Awokening The Left The Middle East The New York Times The South The States The Zeroth Amendment To The Constitution Theranos Theresa May Third World Thomas Jefferson Thomas Moorer Thought Crimes Tiananmen Massacre Tiger Mom TikTok TIMSS Tom Cotton Tom Massie Tom Wolfe Tony Blair Tony Blinken Tony Kleinfeld Too Many White People Torture Trade Trans Fat Trans Fats Transgender Transgenderism Transhumanism Translation Translations Transportation Travel Trayvon Martin Trolling True Redneck Stereotypes Trump Trump Derangement Syndrome Trust Tsarist Russia Tucker Carlson Tulsa Tulsi Gabbard Turkey Turks TWA 800 Twins Twitter Ucla UFOs UK Ukrainian Crisis UN Security Council Unbearable Whiteness Unemployment Unions United Kingdom United Nations United Nations General Assembly United Nations Security Council United States Universal Basic Income UNRWA Urbanization Ursula Von Der Leyen Uruguay US Blacks US Capitol Storming 2021 US Civil War II US Constitution US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 US Regionalism USA USAID USS Liberty USSR Uyghurs Uzbekistan Vaccination Vaccines Valdimir Putin Valerie Plame Vdare Venezuela Vibrancy Victoria Nuland Victorian England Video Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Vikings Viktor Orban Viktor Yanukovych Violence Vioxx Virginia Virginia Israel Advisory Board Vitamin D Vivek Ramaswamy Vladimir Zelensky Volodymur Zelenskyy Volodymyr Zelensky Vote Fraud Voter Fraud Voting Rights Voting Rights Act Vulcan Society Wall Street Walmart Wang Ching Wei Wang Jingwei War War Crimes War Guilt War In Donbass War On Christmas War On Terror War Powers War Powers Act Warhammer Washington DC WASPs Watergate Wealth Wealth Inequality Wealthy Web Traffic Weight WEIRDO Welfare Wendy Sherman West Bank Western Decline Western European Marriage Pattern Western Hypocrisy Western Media Western Religion Western Revival Westerns White America White Americans White Death White Flight White Guilt White Helmets White Liberals White Man's Burden White Nakba White Nationalism White Nationalists White People White Privilege White Slavery White Supremacy White Teachers Whiterpeople Whites Who Whom Whoopi Goldberg Wikileaks Wikipedia William Browder William F. Buckley William Kristol William Latson William McGonagle William McRaven WINEP Winston Churchill WMD Woke Capital Women Woodrow Wilson Workers Working Class World Bank World Economic Forum World Health Organization World Population World Values Survey World War G World War H World War Hair World War I World War III World War R World War T World War Weed WTF WVS WWII Xi Jinping Xinjiang Yahya Sinwar Yair Lapid Yemen Yevgeny Prigozhin Yoav Gallant Yogi Berra's Restaurant Yoram Hazony YouTube Yugoslavia Yuval Noah Harari Zbigniew Brzezinski Zimbabwe Zionism Zionists Zvika Fogel
Nothing found
All Commenters •ï¿½My
Comments
•ï¿½Followed
Commenters
�⇅All / On "American Dream"
    The US has one of the most deeply-ingrained nationalistic ideologies of any nation. Accompanying the grand mass hysterias of patriotism and freedom, one of the most pervasive links in the ideological chain that creates the American sense of identity is a belief in “The American Dreamâ€, an imaginary ideal that offers a rags-to-riches path to...
  • @Kali
    So, from "The American Dream", we move seamlessly into "The China Dream"???

    I think not!

    Though what you express regarding China's prosperity may be true of today, it is not true of yesterday and is not guarenteed for tomorrow.

    When our prospects for a happiness and balance are dictated by Market Forces and perpetual economic (think "economy-stupid") growth underpinned by top-down, centralised "authority", it is almost inevitable that, sooner or later, greed, hubris, psychopathy or even simple egotism, will assert itself to the benefit of a minority and the detriment of the majority.

    When the Common Wealth of the planet is sucked up by industry and markets - alegedly to be redistributed, by government or by "trickle-down" lies, to the people - and when this wealth extraction inevitably benefits those at the top of the extraction/distribution chain, then the system, top heavy as it inevitably becomes, ultimately falls under the weight of its own bullshit.

    So, replacing one propagandistic dream with another is little more than an excercise in "manufacturing consent" for a new unrealistic dream.

    Give every man, woman and child on the planet access to arable land, water, resources to build, plant, grow, and micro-generate energy for themelves, and remove every form of government control/authority from the equasion, leaving only basic local administrative duties to actual servants of the public, and let us evolve as nature, and our own abilities, decree. Let us make our own way in the world and let the stupid notion that "government knows best" die along with The American Dream!

    Enough already!

    Best regards,
    Kali.

    Replies: @Boiled Logic

    We fought a revolutionary war 1776 to rid ourselves away from global control (England in those days). This war should have never ended.
    I don’t want nor need the American dream, any convenience, nor safety. And the property I own, as in American dream, house and picket fence is really rented from the taxman. And if you want to use anything to keep alive, like water, air, ground to grow food you must also pay the taxman. This sh*t has been going on longer than most realize. They even wrote a book (Bible, new testament) centuries ago, revised it many times, to get you in line as sheep. A side note: I’m figuring Revelations in the Bible isn’t so much prophecy as it is a business model for Global control. This sh*t goes back that far!

  • @TimMcGraw
    So much has and continues to be written about the failed American "experiment." I love the Unz site; it provides a formidable juxtaposition to the drivel that trickles out of western civilization, and makes me think. The quibbles I have with the content, are that it is, one, heavy on the Antisemitism, a form of which I don't care for. Opportunistic. Like the excesses of banks, dominated by Jews, is representative of Jews as a whole. When excesses become apparent, it's easy to throw stones, But I don't buy it. And worse, two, it lumps the entire American population into a nice convenient box of abused coal miners or cotton pickers or service workers, unaware of how much they are abused and mistreated by the corrupt American system of government. A bunch of rubes. I don't buy that, either.

    I live in a heavily blue state, Illinois. Good schools, high level of college graduates, and more. And even here, people can easily, in casual conversation, make a distinction between the corrupted creeps that walk the halls of the plaster, rather than marble, walls of the Illinois capital building (as in cheap facade) and serious politicians who want to improve the lives of the people in society.

    There is a wide wide chasm between the locals who really want a better society, and Washington ideals. And an even wider chasm on how to get there. Obama's "fundamental change" was absolute bullshit to well over 150m Americans, and the voting segment refuted the agenda in 2016. Whether it won or had victory torn away, is one thing. But the 150 didn't vote for the nonsense manifest in the article, and the point I want to make is the 150m, I think more, would be just fine with trimming the government by maybe 75%, hanging all or most of the pols who oversaw Covid and 2008 financial collapse and FBI school shootings, and all the rest. And start over.

    But here's the tricky part, and where the author is confused. The American experiment started with a Declaration, following a long train of abuses. Only then, after numerous attempts to seek redress, did the population rise up and take care of business. Then, America became a country. Currently, our problems are not a failure of the idea: it's a failure of will. And a reluctance to risk the destruction of a system that would work, and quite well, thank you very much, without all the corruption. And I'm almost ashamed to say, it's our fault, for reelecting the same non-serious flawed people over and over. But please don't bury America. It's not going away. After all, Russia survived how many years of Tyranny?

    America, it once was the "Land of the Free, Home of the Brave." And will be again. But, and it's a big but, there has to be a new government, with new, fresh ideas, waiting in the wings, organized under a Constitution. All we need to do is identify the "Brave." They are out there. And if things get any worse, the world will hear from them.

    Replies: @RoatanBill, @Eric Novak

    Russia survived because it’s dominated by a single ethnic group. America will not survive in its current demographic form. This is an inevitable, undeniable fact as hard as an ice pick in the eye, no matter how pathetic the denial.

  • @anonymous
    Tho it wouldn't be generally possible for huge numbers to emulate in the USA, one nonetheless has many, many stories of immigrants recently arriving in America with little or no resources, who yet achieve success as millionaire mini-capitalists over the space of a few years, principally from amongst various groups of Asians. Components of their success include:
    - Hugely long-hours and hard work others won't do
    - Pooling resources with relatives or co-ethnic immigrants to enable capitalist acquisition of assets, in both business-owning and real estate
    - Living for a time in crowded, group-home, bunk-bed circumstances whites wouldn't tolerate, whilst assets are gathered
    - A certain ruthlessness regarding, and focus upon, what makes money, most all else pushed to the side
    - Utter willingness to exploit identifiable opportunities such as government contracts, affirmative action etc
    - Knowing how to confuse and evade authorities ('My English no good!') when questions are asked about dodgy conduct

    From the point of view of these 'millionaire from nothing within 10 years' immigrants, the white-heritage Americans 'just don't have the drive' to do what they do. Whites are overall inclined to less-demanding life patterns, their usual 'best' is just entering a profession where upper-middle class incomes are frequent, such as health care, or, to a lesser extent, lawyers (i.e., many of the USA's 1-million-plus lawyers are surplus, and do not have a high-income future)

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Justvisiting, @James Scott, @profnasty, @mocissepvis, @Eric Novak

    Yes, success with billions in SBA loans unavailable to white entrepreneurs and small business owners and a technical and business education unavailable to whites who pay for it anyway.

  • Alrenous says: •ï¿½Website
    @Hitmarck
    @Truth Vigilante

    real â„¢ capitalism has never been tried
    real â„¢ communism has never been tried
    real â„¢ fascism worked so good, we had to pincer it out of existence

    Replies: @Mac_, @Alrenous

    real â„¢ communism has

    been tried numerous times. The most recent strain started with the Owenite communes in the 1830s. The more complete the Communism, the closer to omnicide it is. Exemplar was that incident in Szechuan province which resulted in it losing more than 90% of its population. They probably didn’t all starve to death, but if they had stuck around they would have. See also: Rome’s final days. Same factor-of-ten thing.

    real â„¢ capitalism has

    been tried numerous times, it lifts astounding numbers of folk out of poverty. Turns out theft is bad, even if it’s performed “with colour of law.” A real shocker, I know.

    real â„¢ fascism worked so good

    it’s what you have right now. America is a Fascist country. There were no good guys in WWII.
    Which itself is a bit of duh moment. Who starts a world war? Turns out world conquest is bad actually. Husbands and wives deserve each other, and world wars start when there are two world-conquest religions around.

  • @RoatanBill
    @Wade

    You'll note that I mentioned several things that need correcting, not just the voting process and that's certainly not an exhaustive list. It's the accumulation of resistance, of non cooperation that needs to be cultivated to get people to wake up to what's happening around them. The election cheating has been normalized and expected, so there's no real shock that requires the sheep's attention. The terminally stupid keep voting with full knowledge that the system is rigged. They absolutely know it's their civic duty.

    I have no illusions on having the population suddenly coming around to my anarchist way of thinking. They've been inculcated with bullshit their entire lives and are dumbed down enough to not notice the deep shit the country is in. They must feel that something isn't right, but can't point at any specifics. Besides, there's probably a ball game on.

    If I were to bet, the Pareto Principle would apply to all aspects of what's wrong with the US. 80% are too ignorant and apathetic to want to really understand the plight that's about to befall them and the 20% know all too well what's going on and can't do anything about it given their numbers. The 80% think the 20% are conspiracy theorists, white supremacists, anarchists, etc and don't want to hear anything from those kooks. They know that's true because the MSM told them so.

    It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe that there would be a revolution before morning.
    Henry Ford

    It all starts with the phony money. The vast majority have no idea how currency is conjured into existence, for example. They have no clue what drives price inflation. They are told it's those greedy corporations and small business people and they believe it. Putin is surely responsible for the current price increases. Some of the posters on this site are representative of the 80% I mentioned, dumb as a stump.

    People are stupid enough to demand that corporations pay their fair share of taxes, not realizing that they end up paying those taxes as a price component of the product or service they purchase. All it does is provide the gov't with a way of hiding part of the tax the people actually pay and the dolts demand they continue being hoodwinked.

    On and on it goes. The Dollar crash will be the 2x4 to the mule's head, but till then, ...

    You can't fix stupid.
    Ron White

    Replies: @H. L. M

    Many people that post here are truly dumb as bricks. One example would be Ron himself who actually believes that Mike Pompeo is responsible for a US bioweapon attack on China (covid 19), and that covid “vaccines ” promote public health.

    Propaganda works!!

  • @WorkingClass
    I was born in '44, a white working class man. The American dream was a modest home of your own with a white picket fence. A wife and three kids and a dog. Food in the frige and gas in the tank. All on working class wages and a 40 hour week with the promice of a pension for your old age. That America is gone along with it's dream.

    Or maybe the dream just went to China along with American Industry.

    Replies: @Diversity Heretic, @animalogic, @The Real World, @Alrenous, @Showmethereal, @Not Important, @TheMoon, @William Williams

    >>>Or maybe the dream just went to China along with American Industry.

    It’s too bad that the decision-makers, large and small, who chose to export the USA’s manufacturing base do not have names and addresses.

  • @Wade
    @RoatanBill


    Instead of 68% of people voting, the regime’s legitimacy evaporates when it’s 10%.
    �
    Really? And just how so? The regime obviously and patently cheated in the 2020 elections. It's obvious to everyone that has looked closely at the situation. But the suspicions of millions haven't slowed the regime down one iota. Yes, if only 10% of the US population voted, this would make the regime look even more illegitimate. What then? Do you think they have any residual deeply held convictions about "the consent of the governed?" No, they'd keep rolling on like nothing happened.

    I've racked my brains on this and I cannot think of how any other group of people on the planet would successfully handle things differently if they were in our shoes. It's not stupidity (as much as you'd love to characterize it that way). I know professional accountants, doctors, pharmacists, business owners, you name it, who are utterly oblivious to any and all major issues that would expose the regime for what they truly are. Maybe some of the latest occurrences are for the first time changing that a bit. But only just now.

    Replies: @RoatanBill

    You’ll note that I mentioned several things that need correcting, not just the voting process and that’s certainly not an exhaustive list. It’s the accumulation of resistance, of non cooperation that needs to be cultivated to get people to wake up to what’s happening around them. The election cheating has been normalized and expected, so there’s no real shock that requires the sheep’s attention. The terminally stupid keep voting with full knowledge that the system is rigged. They absolutely know it’s their civic duty.

    I have no illusions on having the population suddenly coming around to my anarchist way of thinking. They’ve been inculcated with bullshit their entire lives and are dumbed down enough to not notice the deep shit the country is in. They must feel that something isn’t right, but can’t point at any specifics. Besides, there’s probably a ball game on.

    If I were to bet, the Pareto Principle would apply to all aspects of what’s wrong with the US. 80% are too ignorant and apathetic to want to really understand the plight that’s about to befall them and the 20% know all too well what’s going on and can’t do anything about it given their numbers. The 80% think the 20% are conspiracy theorists, white supremacists, anarchists, etc and don’t want to hear anything from those kooks. They know that’s true because the MSM told them so.

    It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe that there would be a revolution before morning.
    Henry Ford

    It all starts with the phony money. The vast majority have no idea how currency is conjured into existence, for example. They have no clue what drives price inflation. They are told it’s those greedy corporations and small business people and they believe it. Putin is surely responsible for the current price increases. Some of the posters on this site are representative of the 80% I mentioned, dumb as a stump.

    People are stupid enough to demand that corporations pay their fair share of taxes, not realizing that they end up paying those taxes as a price component of the product or service they purchase. All it does is provide the gov’t with a way of hiding part of the tax the people actually pay and the dolts demand they continue being hoodwinked.

    On and on it goes. The Dollar crash will be the 2�4 to the mule’s head, but till then, …

    You can’t fix stupid.
    Ron White

    •ï¿½Replies: @H. L. M
    @RoatanBill

    Many people that post here are truly dumb as bricks. One example would be Ron himself who actually believes that Mike Pompeo is responsible for a US bioweapon attack on China (covid 19), and that covid "vaccines " promote public health.

    Propaganda works!!
  • Wade says:
    @RoatanBill
    @Justvisiting

    Stop cooperating.

    Stop supporting the men in blue that don't fight crime, can't possibly fight crime and will come for your guns while telling you they're only doing their job. Defund street cops. Demand your natural right to carry any weapon you choose to protect yourself as the constitution clearly allows without gov't permission slips.

    Become your own street cop along with your neighbors and kill off some piece of shit that dares come at you or your property. That's called self defense and is everyone's natural right. Spend more on investigators and forensics people to catch more dirtbags and then execute them on their first offense. Reduce the expense for prisons guards, parole officers, etc. A few shotgun blasts and a few dead antifa would have shut down all the rioting and burning pronto.

    Get off your knees. If every gun owner showed up at the governor's mansion, the mayor's mansion, the prosecutor's office, etc and told them what the news laws are that allow common sense defense, what are they going to do to stop it from happening? Assert your natural rights; it's called real democracy.

    Man has no right to kill his brother. It is no excuse that he does so in uniform: he only adds the infamy of servitude to the crime of murder.
    Percy Bysshe Shelley


    Stop supporting the troops that are just murderers in costume that have caused the deaths of millions in just this century alone all for trumped up wars of choice. There has been no war since at least Vietnam that wasn't offensive, making the troops the aggressors in other people's lands. When martial law is eventually declared once the Dollar dies, they will come to your neighborhood under the guise of restoring order and follow orders to shoot you should you not want to be made a slave to an in your face dictatorship. It's coming.

    The basic problem is quite simple. An elected representative is not tied in any substantial way to particular policies, whatever the preferences of the electorate. Influence on the politician is greatest at the time of election. Once elected, the representative is released from popular control but continues to be exposed to powerful pressure groups, especially corporations, state bureaucracies and political party power brokers.
    Brian Martin


    Stop voting.

    Instead of 68% of people voting, the regime's legitimacy evaporates when it's 10%. On the way to a low number, people will realize that they're not alone in their thinking that the system is rigged and the number will sink faster. It's cooperating in their theater that gives them the legitimacy to screw the population over every damned time.

    Is that precise enough for you?

    Replies: @Wade

    Instead of 68% of people voting, the regime’s legitimacy evaporates when it’s 10%.

    Really? And just how so? The regime obviously and patently cheated in the 2020 elections. It’s obvious to everyone that has looked closely at the situation. But the suspicions of millions haven’t slowed the regime down one iota. Yes, if only 10% of the US population voted, this would make the regime look even more illegitimate. What then? Do you think they have any residual deeply held convictions about “the consent of the governed?” No, they’d keep rolling on like nothing happened.

    I’ve racked my brains on this and I cannot think of how any other group of people on the planet would successfully handle things differently if they were in our shoes. It’s not stupidity (as much as you’d love to characterize it that way). I know professional accountants, doctors, pharmacists, business owners, you name it, who are utterly oblivious to any and all major issues that would expose the regime for what they truly are. Maybe some of the latest occurrences are for the first time changing that a bit. But only just now.

    •ï¿½Replies: @RoatanBill
    @Wade

    You'll note that I mentioned several things that need correcting, not just the voting process and that's certainly not an exhaustive list. It's the accumulation of resistance, of non cooperation that needs to be cultivated to get people to wake up to what's happening around them. The election cheating has been normalized and expected, so there's no real shock that requires the sheep's attention. The terminally stupid keep voting with full knowledge that the system is rigged. They absolutely know it's their civic duty.

    I have no illusions on having the population suddenly coming around to my anarchist way of thinking. They've been inculcated with bullshit their entire lives and are dumbed down enough to not notice the deep shit the country is in. They must feel that something isn't right, but can't point at any specifics. Besides, there's probably a ball game on.

    If I were to bet, the Pareto Principle would apply to all aspects of what's wrong with the US. 80% are too ignorant and apathetic to want to really understand the plight that's about to befall them and the 20% know all too well what's going on and can't do anything about it given their numbers. The 80% think the 20% are conspiracy theorists, white supremacists, anarchists, etc and don't want to hear anything from those kooks. They know that's true because the MSM told them so.

    It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe that there would be a revolution before morning.
    Henry Ford

    It all starts with the phony money. The vast majority have no idea how currency is conjured into existence, for example. They have no clue what drives price inflation. They are told it's those greedy corporations and small business people and they believe it. Putin is surely responsible for the current price increases. Some of the posters on this site are representative of the 80% I mentioned, dumb as a stump.

    People are stupid enough to demand that corporations pay their fair share of taxes, not realizing that they end up paying those taxes as a price component of the product or service they purchase. All it does is provide the gov't with a way of hiding part of the tax the people actually pay and the dolts demand they continue being hoodwinked.

    On and on it goes. The Dollar crash will be the 2x4 to the mule's head, but till then, ...

    You can't fix stupid.
    Ron White

    Replies: @H. L. M
  • @mocissepvis
    @Showmethereal


    Actually – ethnic minorities in China receive far more subsidy than they do in the US.
    �
    The Uyghurs would beg to differ with you.

    Replies: @mulga mumblebrain

    Are you an ignorant cretin, or a lying racist-or both? The Uighurs like all minorities, receive excellent opportunities in the PRC. They were never covered by the ‘one-child’ policy for a start.

  • @Zumbuddi
    @thotmonger

    Five years ago David Goldman ("Spengler") informed an audience at Westminster Institute about the Chinese total surveillance system:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=itAVYCiJ43g

    And a few years before that, in 2014, James Corbett offered evidence that the Chinese, the Russians, and the American (((and other))) financial cohort are working together, not in competition.

    https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-297-china-and-the-new-world-order/

    So Goldman's presentation at Westminster was not so much a warning but a snapshot of Things to Come.

    Replies: @mulga mumblebrain

    Goldman, in my opinion, is a Judaic supremacist fanatic. He hates China and the Chinese because they do not worship Jews, but, scandalously, treat them as fellow human beings.

  • @Legba
    Well Mr Commie, may I ask if China had a ONE BILLION DOLLAR lotto winner last week?

    Replies: @mulga mumblebrain

    That’s about ten cents for every dollop of human faeces on US city streets. USA! USA! USA!

  • @Truth Vigilante
    @Curmudgeon


    If I had to follow an opinion, it would be Hudson’s, given former Assistant Secretary Paul Craig Roberts, saying that he is the leading economist currently.
    �
    Go ahead, stay cocooned in your little bubble of Confirmation Bias.

    In this and other threads on UR, I've posted comment after comment from the likes of the adherents to the Austrian Economic School. ie: people like Libertarians Peter Schiff and Dr Ron Paul whereby they predicted financial cataclysms like the 2008 GFC, the subprime mortgage meltdown (not just predicted it but specifically outlined the SEVERITY of what was to come), yet you choose to believe in a Trotskyist like Michael Hudson.

    I had an exchange with one of Michael Hudson's groupies, a Mofo called Bill, and I asked him to furnish me with all the video and newspaper interviews where Hudson was warning us vociferously in advance that said catastrophe was heading the way of America.

    All I got in return was .... CRICKETS.

    You see, Michael Hudson, then as now, was totally clueless.

    Yes, in recent months, now that inflation has reached a 40 year high, Hudson is coming out and saying we have an inflation problem.
    And, after a torrential downpour, as our car is floating away down the street in a newly created river, he'll be warning us of 'showers' likely - ALWAYS after the event.

    WHERE was Hudson years ago, in giving any warnings - like Peter Schiff was warning a DECADE or more ago ?

    Keynesians like Hudson can be summed up succinctly as always being:

    A DAY LATE and a DOLLAR SHORT.

    Replies: @Curmudgeon

    LOL. The always misrepresented Keynes predicted cataclysms when currency was debased. Hudson is talking about debasement of currency. WTF is your point? Are you saying currency isn’t being debased? Economists are always wrong about something. If they get to withing 15% margin of error, they are considered “brilliant”.
    You diss Roberts. Do you not think a person in his position in the Treasury would have a better understanding than the “Austrian School” of how things actually, not theoretically work? Clifford Douglas was talking about money taken out of the economy due to interest a century ago. When his model was partially implemented in the Province of Alberta which had a massive debt during the depression, the social credit model kick started the economy and cleared the debt. The non-aligned movement in North Dakota used a non Austrian School model that has served that state well for over a century. People like you are stuck in the “one size fits all mindset”. Economies are affected by many things, including history, geography, and climate. They all have different needs, and globalist models won’t always work.
    Go to a site like marketoracle.co.uk and you can find a dozen different assessment on the same topic. Obviously, they all can’t be correct, and Hudson isn’t entirely correct either.

  • Marcali says:
    @Truth Vigilante
    @Marcali


    If however a one party political system is coupled with a market economy then it is a fascist state.
    So where does China sit?
    �
    In the 30 or so years after Deng Xiaoping opened the flood gates that unleashed the pent-up Chinese entrepreneurialism, China was the most capitalistic of the major countries and they accumulated quite a nest egg of savings coupled to prudent economic stewardship.

    However, in the wake of the 2008 GFC and the concomitant downturn in exports to their major trading partners, the Chinese government stepped in with its profligate and fiscally reckless infrastructure expenditure that saw the ghost cities built, highways and high speed rail projects to nowhere, an excess of under-utilised international airports being built etc.

    This was done to stave off civil unrest resulting from widespread unemployment in the event that the recession was allowed to run its course.

    In other words, the busy body socialist central planners took the helm and pursued these options that have MASSIVELY INCREASED DEBT and rendered China's economy more fragile and susceptible to future economic shocks.

    So, to answer your question, China was very much pursuing the capitalist trajectory up until the 2008 GFC and has been more under the socialist thumb in the immediate aftermath of that recession.

    That said, even post 2008 the dynamism of the Chinese private sector is so great, and its productivity so impressive, I believe that it has done more than enough to counteract the parasitic and loss making activities of the central planning socialists.

    This is ESPECIALLY SO in the case of the post Covid Pandemic period.
    As the U.S went into lockdown in the immediate aftermath of March 2020 and trillions of USD were conjured up from thin air to dole out to Trump's Zio benefactors and cronies, some trillions were also conjured up and doled out to working class Americans who were paid more to stay at home than they were being paid in their minimum wage jobs.

    END RESULT: America was producing less 'stuff' since no one wanted to work as they were afraid they'd get the 'rona'.
    So, the Chinese factories, after a brief lockdown in China with minimal fatalities, was soon firing on all cylinders producing all the stuff the U.S and the rest of the world needed.

    The trade deficit with the U.S which was already catastrophic, has now reached apocalyptic levels and China's balance sheet has greatly improved - all courtesy of it's private sector which is the engine of the world economy.

    Provided that the socialist central planners don't squander too much more of the the nation's wealth and don't micromanage what the private sector can or cannot do (and so far so good), China should do OK in the medium term.
    �
    So then, I wouldn't call China's system a fascist one in the sense that government is not absolutely sticking its nose into and controlling every aspect of the Chinese private sector as Nazi Germany did to theirs (because all sectors of the German economy were directed to prepare it for readiness in a forthcoming military conflict).

    Yes, the ruling regime in the Middle Kingdom is still called the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) but it is nowhere near as heavy-handed as it was during the Mao era.
    As I see it China is 'communist' in name only and its leaders have long realised that prosperity can ONLY be attained through a market economy, involving minimal taxation, a minuscule regulatory burden and most importantly, a much smaller percentage of GDP allocated to the parasitic government bureaucracies relative to the socialist U.S and western European vassals.

    As long as the Marxist hardliners within the party are kept on a short leash and not allowed to squander too much of the nation's treasure on socialist boondoggles, China will do just fine.

    Replies: @Marcali

    “As I see it China is ‘communist’ in name only”

    For one more reason: as you mention the Party that is the State only controls the companies but does not own them as a true communist party and state would.

    This distinction was first pointed out by the late Freda Utley who experienced life in both communist Russia and national socialist Germany.

    •ï¿½Thanks: Truth Vigilante
  • Well Mr Commie, may I ask if China had a ONE BILLION DOLLAR lotto winner last week?

    •ï¿½Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
    @Legba

    That's about ten cents for every dollop of human faeces on US city streets. USA! USA! USA!
  • @Curmudgeon
    @anon

    Thanks for that. All economists are wrong about something, because all economic (and political) theories are flawed in some way.
    If I had to follow an opinion, it would be Hudson's, given former Assistant Secretary Paul Craig Roberts, saying that he is the leading economist currently.

    Replies: @Truth Vigilante

    If I had to follow an opinion, it would be Hudson’s, given former Assistant Secretary Paul Craig Roberts, saying that he is the leading economist currently.

    Go ahead, stay cocooned in your little bubble of Confirmation Bias.

    In this and other threads on UR, I’ve posted comment after comment from the likes of the adherents to the Austrian Economic School. ie: people like Libertarians Peter Schiff and Dr Ron Paul whereby they predicted financial cataclysms like the 2008 GFC, the subprime mortgage meltdown (not just predicted it but specifically outlined the SEVERITY of what was to come), yet you choose to believe in a Trotskyist like Michael Hudson.

    I had an exchange with one of Michael Hudson’s groupies, a Mofo called Bill, and I asked him to furnish me with all the video and newspaper interviews where Hudson was warning us vociferously in advance that said catastrophe was heading the way of America.

    All I got in return was …. CRICKETS.

    You see, Michael Hudson, then as now, was totally clueless.

    Yes, in recent months, now that inflation has reached a 40 year high, Hudson is coming out and saying we have an inflation problem.
    And, after a torrential downpour, as our car is floating away down the street in a newly created river, he’ll be warning us of ‘showers’ likely – ALWAYS after the event.

    WHERE was Hudson years ago, in giving any warnings – like Peter Schiff was warning a DECADE or more ago ?

    Keynesians like Hudson can be summed up succinctly as always being:

    A DAY LATE and a DOLLAR SHORT.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Curmudgeon
    @Truth Vigilante

    LOL. The always misrepresented Keynes predicted cataclysms when currency was debased. Hudson is talking about debasement of currency. WTF is your point? Are you saying currency isn't being debased? Economists are always wrong about something. If they get to withing 15% margin of error, they are considered "brilliant".
    You diss Roberts. Do you not think a person in his position in the Treasury would have a better understanding than the "Austrian School" of how things actually, not theoretically work? Clifford Douglas was talking about money taken out of the economy due to interest a century ago. When his model was partially implemented in the Province of Alberta which had a massive debt during the depression, the social credit model kick started the economy and cleared the debt. The non-aligned movement in North Dakota used a non Austrian School model that has served that state well for over a century. People like you are stuck in the "one size fits all mindset". Economies are affected by many things, including history, geography, and climate. They all have different needs, and globalist models won't always work.
    Go to a site like marketoracle.co.uk and you can find a dozen different assessment on the same topic. Obviously, they all can't be correct, and Hudson isn't entirely correct either.
  • Besides being a lie factory, the (civil) religion in the US, is America itself. It does not matter if one is a Catholic, Christian, or Jew. The religion in the US, is the love of America. A quasi religious zealotry. Moreover, French sociologist deToqueville noted with US-ers is their inability to think independently-this was in early 1800s. They repeated mantras, sayings, as if they were mesmerized/hypnotized.

    US-ers have a “common religion,†stronger than any religious differences, that of the “American Way of Lifeâ€â€”a set of ideas, rites, and symbols that defines the civil society and supplies an “overarching sense of unity. (Herberg, Will) This “common religion†is why any sharp critique or alternative to the dominant propaganda narrative is met with vitriol, or at the least, eye rolls and sneers.

    Also, Robert Bellah stated: The “American civil religion is not the worship of the American nation but an understanding of the American experience in the light of ultimate and universal reality.†He contended that Americans could call upon not only a common creed of ideals but also their civil religion to evaluate their nation’s actions. Anything counter to the civil religion was seen as an attack, like someone dropping the supper tray, or taking a #2 in the living room.

    US-ers simply could not process another way of living.

    Onward and downward.

  • @anon
    @Truth Vigilante

    peter schiff (in the back) dont know shit. he has been wrong on everything for at least 15 years another jew duping people

    Replies: @Curmudgeon

    Thanks for that. All economists are wrong about something, because all economic (and political) theories are flawed in some way.
    If I had to follow an opinion, it would be Hudson’s, given former Assistant Secretary Paul Craig Roberts, saying that he is the leading economist currently.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Truth Vigilante
    @Curmudgeon


    If I had to follow an opinion, it would be Hudson’s, given former Assistant Secretary Paul Craig Roberts, saying that he is the leading economist currently.
    �
    Go ahead, stay cocooned in your little bubble of Confirmation Bias.

    In this and other threads on UR, I've posted comment after comment from the likes of the adherents to the Austrian Economic School. ie: people like Libertarians Peter Schiff and Dr Ron Paul whereby they predicted financial cataclysms like the 2008 GFC, the subprime mortgage meltdown (not just predicted it but specifically outlined the SEVERITY of what was to come), yet you choose to believe in a Trotskyist like Michael Hudson.

    I had an exchange with one of Michael Hudson's groupies, a Mofo called Bill, and I asked him to furnish me with all the video and newspaper interviews where Hudson was warning us vociferously in advance that said catastrophe was heading the way of America.

    All I got in return was .... CRICKETS.

    You see, Michael Hudson, then as now, was totally clueless.

    Yes, in recent months, now that inflation has reached a 40 year high, Hudson is coming out and saying we have an inflation problem.
    And, after a torrential downpour, as our car is floating away down the street in a newly created river, he'll be warning us of 'showers' likely - ALWAYS after the event.

    WHERE was Hudson years ago, in giving any warnings - like Peter Schiff was warning a DECADE or more ago ?

    Keynesians like Hudson can be summed up succinctly as always being:

    A DAY LATE and a DOLLAR SHORT.

    Replies: @Curmudgeon
  • Zumbuddi says:
    July 31, 2022 at 3:37 pm GMT •ï¿½100 Words
    @thotmonger
    @Godfree Roberts

    I was not expecting this essay to become a puff piece for China. But that is the rabbit Romanov pulls out of the hat for Han. Tadah! Ha.

    And with Godfree's reply appearing as number one, it reminds me how Ehud Barak conveniently appeared on BBC hours after the 9/11/2001 attacks to tell the world that Osama Bin Laden was likely the master mind. Ha. What is that called? Something like the primacy -- or control -- of the message.

    Before you cry too much USA is not more like China, here is another view on the situation there.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZNUP4Dcslyc&t=192s

    Replies: @Zumbuddi

    Five years ago David Goldman (“Spengler”) informed an audience at Westminster Institute about the Chinese total surveillance system:

    Video Link

    And a few years before that, in 2014, James Corbett offered evidence that the Chinese, the Russians, and the American (((and other))) financial cohort are working together, not in competition.

    https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-297-china-and-the-new-world-order/

    So Goldman’s presentation at Westminster was not so much a warning but a snapshot of Things to Come.

    •ï¿½Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
    @Zumbuddi

    Goldman, in my opinion, is a Judaic supremacist fanatic. He hates China and the Chinese because they do not worship Jews, but, scandalously, treat them as fellow human beings.
  • @Truth Vigilante
    @Richard B

    I wasn't aware of the Kirk Douglas molestation of Natalie Wood as a child. Of course it doesn't surprise me that he and his tribe get up to these things.

    Thanks for that and the bit about TDT - it certainly does describe the behaviour of a good many of them.

    Replies: @Zumbuddi

    Just plain ignorant that “Machiavelli” is included — impugned, really — in describing psychopathology.

  • Zumbuddi says:
    July 31, 2022 at 2:59 pm GMT •ï¿½200 Words
    @profnasty
    @Anonymous

    Many boomers lived a generous life because the parents murdered their own children, in Germany. It was a deal made with the Devil.
    Millennials murder their unborn. This should be enough to provide prosperity.
    So, have a good time! You've earned it.

    Replies: @Zumbuddi

    Many boomers lived a generous life because the parents murdered their own children, in Germany. It was a deal made with the Devil.

    Gibney — pulled himself up by his bootstraps, didn’t he:

    Gibney started investing when his Stanford University roommate Ken Howery co-founded PayPal, the electronic payments company, and offered Gibney the chance to buy “friends and family” shares.[3] After investing in PayPal, Gibney worked as a litigator but was soon hired by Peter Thiel after Thiel sold PayPal to eBay in 2002.

    Gibney worked at Thiel’s hedge fund, Clarium, until 2008, making occasional private investments including in Palantir Technologies in 2005 and later in DeepMind, which was acquired by Google for around $450 million in 2014. He then moved to Founders Fund, a venture capital fund started by Thiel. Thiel and Founders Fund were the earliest outside investors in Facebook, SpaceX, and Palantir, and made other investments including in AirBnB, Lyft, Spotify, and Stemcentrx, which AbbVie acquired for $10 billion a few years after Founders Fund’s investment. -wikipedia

    Fascinating that Gibney’s narrative begins in 1946, AFTER “Boomers parents” — the Greatest Generation — were FORCED [WWII fighters were drafted] to kill their European forebears in wars provoked by- and for the benefit of- Jewish zionists as well as the American financial class that Romanoff excoriated.

    iow, Gibney would know well how to spot a sociopath: someone who looks like him. Or Peter Thiel. Or Alex Karp, the deviant, Frankfurt school-loving co-founder of Palantir.

  • @Showmethereal
    @Truth Vigilante

    Actually - ethnic minorities in China receive far more subsidy than they do in the US. For instance you brought up Chinese spending on rail that is not profitable. Well in the heavily populated eastern region - rail is indeed profitable. The places where it is not profitable are in fact the areas where ethnic minorities live in the south (you wouldn’t know the groups) like in Yunnan and Guangxi and in the west like Xinjiang and Tibet. Also ethnic minorities are all given preference in entering universities because they are allowed to have a lower test score than the Han majority. People complain - but try e government says “we are uplifting everyone and the nation is only as strong as it’s weakest link†(paraphrase). As to taxes - mainland Chinese firms pay higher taxes than US firms (which is why many still do business through Hong Kong as it is a tax haven)… and high income Chinese pay higher federal taxes than Americans (though less than some Europeans) - which is why some try to get US residency to pay less taxes - since China currently does not tax global income like the US. But the government soon said they will do less will try to get US residency (unless they are willing to quit their source of Chinese income which is doubtful). As to regulation - that is not true either. The Wild West days of get rich by any means is over. Chinese companies have to follow strict environmental and energy and water conservation rules now. Why??? Rich Chinese left because they complained they did not want their children dying early due to pollution.

    Replies: @mocissepvis

    Actually – ethnic minorities in China receive far more subsidy than they do in the US.

    The Uyghurs would beg to differ with you.

    •ï¿½Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
    @mocissepvis

    Are you an ignorant cretin, or a lying racist-or both? The Uighurs like all minorities, receive excellent opportunities in the PRC. They were never covered by the 'one-child' policy for a start.
  • @Anon
    @Tranceislife

    I pledge allegiance to the flag
    Of the Unconscious States of Awareness
    And to the Banana Republic
    For which it stands
    One plantation
    Under gold
    Individual
    With tyranny and injustice for all.

    Replies: @mocissepvis

    Under gold

    Don’t you mean “under Globalism?”

  • @Rodger Dodger

    Keep on the treadmill; be a good worker ant in the Ant Farm. Do that, and you can have nicer stuff than your daddy (and his daddy before).
    �
    The American Dream was never about "anyone" being able to get "rich". Rather it was that anyone could improve themselves regardless of social class or family income. And that is still true today - anyone who spends less than they earn can accumulate money, learn economically valuable skills, start a business, etc.

    Now, the problems Larry describes are certainly an issue, it is harder today than it was 50 years ago. But the basic premise stands.

    Replies: @Alrenous, @mocissepvis

    anyone who spends less than they earn can accumulate money, learn economically valuable skills, start a business, etc.

    Until the IRS decides that you’re earning more than your social status warrants, in which case it will decide that it wants a bigger cut of your earnings, in which case it’s game over. Unless, that is, you’re one of the One Percent who can afford top-tier lawyers to defend your loot against the State’s money-grubbing mits. If you’re a small business owner, you’re pretty much shit out of luck.

  • @Arthur MacBride
    Always a good read from Larry Romanoff and guaranteed to stimulate lively debate. Thanks Larry.
    It's reasonable imho to view USA as an international organised crime cartel rather than as a country. The victims are not only hapless Syrians Afghans etc but also Americans themselves in increasing numbers as Mr Romanoff points out.

    On a side note on "Christian" America, not only has it by some calculations ravaged much of the world, killing 22 millions of people since Ww2but also virtually eliminated Christianity from its ME homeland. Yes, maybe Jewish policy but consistently and enthusiastically those clean-cut Americans actively killing, looting and subverting for them.

    Albeit we might know decent individual Americans, their country is a murderous criminal disgrace and has been for many years.
    And many keep on falling for bullshit like MAGA...
    America is not what American Dreamers think it is.
    Hopefully articles like this may bring much needed changes.
    One can hope.

    Replies: @mocissepvis

    Albeit we might know decent individual Americans, their country is a murderous criminal disgrace and has been for many years.
    And many keep on falling for bullshit like MAGA…
    America is not what American Dreamers think it is.
    Hopefully articles like this may bring much needed changes.
    One can hope.

    Too many of my fellow Americans cling fiercely to the myth because the implications of losing faith in it are literally too horrible for them to contemplate. When you’ve been so steeped in nationalist propaganda from the day you were born and have come to absorb every foundational myth as part of your ethos, the truth can be lethal. The day in which the 99 percent are presented with incontrovertible proof that the “American Dream” is a lie and always has been, and that there is absolutely NO chance for a life any better than what they have, an orgy of violence will erupt that will make Civil War I (1861 – 65) look like a schoolyard fight by comparison.

  • @repsinec
    The "American Dream" is going nowhere - yet. US Americans earn on average $65,000 a year, making it one of the five richest countries in the World, alongside places like Norway and Switzerland, so when I read of them complaining about their economic woes from the comfort of their mac-mansions my one reaction is to think "Cry me a river!"
    Furthermore, this "Dream" was built on the crushing of all popular movements throughout the Third World, from Guillermo Arbenz in Guatemala and Mohammad Mossadegh in Iran to Jean-Bertrand Aristide of Haiti and Salvador Allende of Chile, alongside countless more examples, and replacing them with more "amenable" dictators and other sundry scumbags, who would then proceed to sow death and destruction amongst their own people whilst selling out to US corporations and taking on unrepayable debts from the IMF.
    US foreign policy has always been about exploiting weaker nations to the hilt, and on the resulting mass of dead bodies (estimated at up to 30 million people) the "American Dream" was perpetuated. US Americans are blissfully oblivious to the fact that their outrageous wealth comes not from their own hard work, but from the blood, sweat and tears of the peoples of the Third World, and for that reason the Empire must die, as must the infamous "middle class" that legitimises it in the eyes of it's populace.
    BTW Europeans and the Japanese profited massively from this "Imperial Wealth Pump" as well and should also pay the price.

    Replies: @Son of a Jedi, @dimples, @mocissepvis

    The “American Dream†is going nowhere – yet. US Americans earn on average $65,000 a year, making it one of the five richest countries in the World, alongside places like Norway and Switzerland, so when I read of them complaining about their economic woes from the comfort of their mac-mansions my one reaction is to think “Cry me a river!â€

    An annual salary of $65,000 is NOT a lot of money anywhere in the developed world today. Between taxes and the rate of inflation, anyone earning that salary and trying to support a family on it, unless they live in rural area with a low cost of living, is at the very bottom of what was traditionally considered “middle class.” Even a decade ago such an annual salary would have been considered quite decent. Today, with inflation reaching double digits (forget about the U.S. government lie of “9 percent”), it’s pretty much an entry level salary in any field requiring education, credentials, or specialized skills.

  • @anonymous
    Tho it wouldn't be generally possible for huge numbers to emulate in the USA, one nonetheless has many, many stories of immigrants recently arriving in America with little or no resources, who yet achieve success as millionaire mini-capitalists over the space of a few years, principally from amongst various groups of Asians. Components of their success include:
    - Hugely long-hours and hard work others won't do
    - Pooling resources with relatives or co-ethnic immigrants to enable capitalist acquisition of assets, in both business-owning and real estate
    - Living for a time in crowded, group-home, bunk-bed circumstances whites wouldn't tolerate, whilst assets are gathered
    - A certain ruthlessness regarding, and focus upon, what makes money, most all else pushed to the side
    - Utter willingness to exploit identifiable opportunities such as government contracts, affirmative action etc
    - Knowing how to confuse and evade authorities ('My English no good!') when questions are asked about dodgy conduct

    From the point of view of these 'millionaire from nothing within 10 years' immigrants, the white-heritage Americans 'just don't have the drive' to do what they do. Whites are overall inclined to less-demanding life patterns, their usual 'best' is just entering a profession where upper-middle class incomes are frequent, such as health care, or, to a lesser extent, lawyers (i.e., many of the USA's 1-million-plus lawyers are surplus, and do not have a high-income future)

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Justvisiting, @James Scott, @profnasty, @mocissepvis, @Eric Novak

    You forgot to add to your list “Ignoring the tax laws and regulations that native-born Americans are forced to comply with (and that cripple, if not kill their opportunities to be successsful entrepreneurs), but that most immigrants, due to their “non-white” status (and the fact that they’ve been brought to America specifically to replace the white native-born), can ignore with few or no consequences.”

  • @Truth Vigilante
    Larry Romanoff writes:

    ... it is the quality of China’s leaders, the fact of China’s one-party government system, and China’s unique version of socialist capitalism that have made this possible.

    �
    There is no example of a successful nation that employed 'Socialist Capitalism' (ie: both philosophies employed in EQUAL measure), in all of human history.

    To the extent that there exist some Communist Maoist hardliners in the party that believe in centralised government planning and Socialism, and to the extent that they've funnelled countless billions into loss making state owned enterprises (SOE's) that are haemorrhaging red ink (as are the hundreds of billions wasted on building ghost cities, highways and high speed rail to nowhere), all of these losses are more than compensated for by the productive Chinese private sector.

    At least that's been the case so far. Of course a tipping point may occur where losses sustained from crackpot government bureaucratic central planning overcomes the private sector's dynamism and when that occurs, China will be in for a world of hurt.

    Importantly Larry, your article does not address the REASON for why the 1% have managed to siphon off America's wealth in the present era.
    After all, there have always been schemers and chisellers in every era and there's no proof that said grifters are any more egregious today than in any previous period.

    What is it that has ENABLED the 1% to siphon off the wealth of America ?

    Of course it is the elephant in the room that you refuse to address.
    It is none other than BIG GOVERNMENT.

    Why is it that the U.S is capable of spending over a trillion dollars per year on the Military-Industrial-Security/Surveillance state complex ?

    It is because they've managed to extract said money (for the most part) from taxpayers.

    If government is TINY, and by definition this can only happen if taxes are minimal, said government can only get up to so much mischief.

    CHINA IS THAT LOW TAXING GOVERNMENT.

    You can get ahead in China because you keep the bulk of what you earn. There is no crushing regulatory burden on businesses that prevents new entrants from taking market share from the established oligarchs. There is no regulatory burden that forces employers to employ minorities and have racial/gender/sexual preference diversity that necessarily entails that the best qualified candidate for said job is often not hired - thus reducing productivity.

    There is no excess of finite capital that supports layer upon layer of parasitic bureaucracy as there is in the U.S and other western nations.

    Spending on government as proportion of GDP in China is FAR LOWER than in the U.S.

    China is the world's leading capitalist country.

    Bottom Line: Larry, you and I are both in agreement that the present system in the U.S is a disaster and it needs to be abolished.
    But Larry, you FAIL to identify the culprit.

    Older commenters here in the UR will remember a time when a typical family lived comfortably with a single breadwinner in the household, a time when there were no tent cities comprised of the homeless, a time when countless numbers of homeless were not found sleeping under freeway overpasses etc.

    But is was GOVERNMENT that off-shored American manufacturing jobs, it was government that allowed tens of millions of undocumented migrants to cross the border, it was the government that engaged and provoked these endless foreign military misadventures, it was government that allowed the creation of the Federal Reserve and ownership of it to a private Zionist cartel.
    �
    America was once a bastion of capitalism and life was good then.
    It no longer is. Today it is a Socialist Surveillance state and hence a shit-hole in many places - and fast becoming that way in those enclaves remaining that still have some normality.

    Replies: @sonofman, @animalogic, @Levtraro, @Kratoklastes, @JR Foley, @A B Coreopsis, @Marcali, @TPM, @Showmethereal, @profnasty, @mocissepvis

    Importantly Larry, your article does not address the REASON for why the 1% have managed to siphon off America’s wealth in the present era.
    After all, there have always been schemers and chisellers in every era and there’s no proof that said grifters are any more egregious today than in any previous period.

    What is it that has ENABLED the 1% to siphon off the wealth of America ?

    Of course it is the elephant in the room that you refuse to address.
    It is none other than BIG GOVERNMENT.

    And we all know (((who))) is chiefly responsible for this “Big Government.” For very obvious reaasons, Larry (((Romanoff))) isn’t going to touch that one.

    •ï¿½Agree: Truth Vigilante
  • Michael Korn [AKA "Mevashir"] says:
    July 31, 2022 at 2:16 am GMT •ï¿½100 Words
    @Anon
    @Robert Dolan

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJifkSyrU24

    Take a look at 36:00 where the Jewish studio head refers to his wife as "she/her" in an interview. Never once calling her by name or "my wife." Just a trophy for goycceptance.

    Warner's daughter admits on camera (53:00) that he never once told her about his Jewish heritage religion or beliefs. All concealed from his progeny. The same was true for my parents. They were desperate to blend in even as they demanded obeisance to Jewish ideals.

    Replies: @Michael Korn

    The interview at 36 minutes is with Samuel Goldwyn not Warner. His manner of referring to his wife Frances probably reflects his European mannerisms rather than reflecting poorly on their relationship. These links suggest they had a very strong marriage and a deep love for each other. They were married for 49 years, very long by Hollywood standards. She was a Catholic her whole life:

    Frances Goldwyn
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frances_Howard_(actress)
    https://www.nytimes.com/1976/07/03/archives/frances-howard-goldwyn-dies-actress-and-husbands-partner.html

    I apologize to the spirit of Samuel Goldwyn and his wife for unfairly maligning them.

  • Blissex says:
    @shadowy_figure
    @Blissex

    I haven't got a lot of real estate but I benefited from stock prices going way up. I confess that I think a lot of my ill-gotten gains are due to the progressive economic policies of the government. When the government said it was going to do some quantitative easing, it went straight into the greedy mouths of the banks. Where we're not seeing eye, is on the subject of blame. I didn't vote for any of this crap. I was/am an inadvertent beneficiary, and I think that a good many people fit into this category. Now that the government is finding new ways to spend money that bypasses the financial sector, inflation is now finding it's way into consumables.

    I think that some of the proposed methods of curing the inflation disease could do even more harm to the the patient. More taxation would curb inflation a bit since it takes money out of the economy but, it with net taxation for some people already over 50%, taxation at such a high rate will do other types of economic damage and may even result in less government revenue in the end due to perverse economic effects, and we have to believe that the government won't see the new revenue as an excuse to spend more. We live inside a managerial state that sees wealth transfer between population groups as a holy imperative.

    My advice to people is just to own stuff that won't get clobbered if hyperinflation comes, and I think that hyperinflation will come.

    Replies: @Blissex

    «I didn’t vote for any of this crap. I was/am an inadvertent beneficiary»

    Your personal experience is important for you, but I don’t think it is that common, a lot of people utterly rely on their massive real estate and share [rice profits to finance their lifestyles (refis for example) or their future retirement, and vote accordingly.

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-22/opendoor-open-faces-an-expensive-path-to-profitability-in-real-estate
    «From the minute the average couple buys a home they’re constantly calculating how much they’ll make when they sell it, and most won’t sell for much less once that day comes.»

    https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-financial-110217-023036
    «evidence, which suggests that inflated house-price expectations across the economy played a central role in driving both the demand for and the supply of mortgage credit before the crisis. The great misnomer of the 2008 crisis is that it was not a subprime crisis but rather a middle-class crisis. Inflated house-price expectations led households across all income groups, especially the middle class, to increase their demand for housing and mortgage leverage.»

    http://www.enterstageright.com/archive/articles/0903/0903norquistinterview.htm
    «The growth of the investor class — those 70 per cent of voters who own stock and are more opposed to taxes and regulations on business as a result — is strengthening the conservative movement. More gun owners, fewer labor union members, more homeschoolers, more property owners and a dwindling number of FDR-era Democrats all strengthen the conservative movement versus the Democrats.»
    […] But going into November, what actually saved it for the Republicans was the investor vote, which went heavily R. Why? One, they didn’t blame Bush for the collapse of the bubble. They were mad at having lower stock prices and 401(k)s, but they didn’t say Bush did this and that caused this. Secondly, the Democratic solution was to sic the trial lawyers on Enron and finish it off. No no no no no. We want our market caps to go back up, not low. […] The 1930s rhetoric was bash business — only a handful of bankers thought that meant them. Now if you say we’re going to smash the big corporations, 60-plus percent of voters say “That’s my retirement you’re messing with. I don’t appreciate that”. And the Democrats have spent 50 years explaining that Republicans will pollute the earth and kill baby seals to get market caps higher. And in 2002, voters said, “We’re sorry about the seals and everything but we really got to get the stock market up.»

  • @Robert Dolan
    @Mario Partisan

    I believe it's in the book, "An Empire Of Their Own," that the jewish author openly admits that organized jewry deliberately screwed the American people by changing the vision of the country from that of a high trust, hard working, God fearing nation....into a slimy meth infested crew of monkeypox buttfuckers and trannies looking for kids to groom.

    Keep in mind that this effort took many years of sleepless nights for the relentless small hats and trillions of dollars in bribes as well as Epstein honeypots entrapping leaders with 12 year olds.

    Got to hand it to the small hats though.....that's truly an exquisite amount of jewing.

    Replies: @thotmonger, @Anon

    Video Link
    Take a look at 36:00 where the Jewish studio head refers to his wife as “she/her” in an interview. Never once calling her by name or “my wife.” Just a trophy for goycceptance.

    Warner’s daughter admits on camera (53:00) that he never once told her about his Jewish heritage religion or beliefs. All concealed from his progeny. The same was true for my parents. They were desperate to blend in even as they demanded obeisance to Jewish ideals.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Michael Korn
    @Anon

    The interview at 36 minutes is with Samuel Goldwyn not Warner. His manner of referring to his wife Frances probably reflects his European mannerisms rather than reflecting poorly on their relationship. These links suggest they had a very strong marriage and a deep love for each other. They were married for 49 years, very long by Hollywood standards. She was a Catholic her whole life:

    Frances Goldwyn
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frances_Howard_(actress)
    https://www.nytimes.com/1976/07/03/archives/frances-howard-goldwyn-dies-actress-and-husbands-partner.html
    �
    I apologize to the spirit of Samuel Goldwyn and his wife for unfairly maligning them.
  • @Mario Partisan
    I agree with the author's perspective - the Ideology of America is a fraud designed to keep those abused by the system identifying with its abusive structures. "The American Dream" is gas-lighting extraodinaire.

    But let's dig a little deeper. First, "The Dream" ideology is, despite its falsehood in the modern era, based on something long gone, but genuine - namely the opportunities that this virgin land offered at the time that the USA was founded as a state.

    In the 17 to early 1800s, America offered genuine opportunities that were unavailable to many in the British imperial center. Those who would have had no prospect of owning land in England could come to the colonies and work virgin soil, become a petty bourgeois, accumulate savings and put their progeny on a path that the aristocratically monopolized Britain made impossible. It was this primordial environment that became the root of the false "American Dream" ideology.

    But of course, the unique material conditions of America at its origins could not last. Eventually the virgin soil becomes occupied, the same monopolistic, financial-aristocratic tendencies of the old world take root and America became just a bigger version of the oppressive "Old Country". (Being so large in area as America is, these oppressive conditions were for many years attenuated in comparison to the situation in England, but developed nevertheless.)

    The difference with the Old World is that there *was* an epoch of colonial freedom that stayed in the collective memory of the people and become the basis for the continuation of "The Dream" ideology, long passed its correspondence with material reality.

    It is a tenant of Marxism that ideas lag behind material conditions - people continue to view today's world through the lense of a real, but lost past.

    In short, the relatively free origins of America's existence have become the basis of the false "American Dream" ideology of today.

    Even after the original conditions supporting the ideology were gone, historical "abnormalities" allowed for its perpetuation. The destruction of Europe and Japan following the world wars allowed America to develope into an unchallenged industrial and financial super power; that status then allowed America to maintain the illusion of prosperity even after the era of de-industrialization by living off the tribute, payed in goods and services, of developing nations. And so it was in this way that the "American Dream" continued to have a material reality for the citizenry. But in truth, the ideology was already living off the mortgaging of its original validity.

    Everything in America is, at this point, a facade - even the produce in it supermarkets, as Romanoff described in a recent article.

    For quite some time, the "American Dream" has been nothing but a "Zionist Dream" - America is a land in which Jewish parasitism has found its most satisfying host. "The American Dream" is now little more than the projection of its abusers' success onto their victims.

    But now the host is dead and dry, and yet the parasite is incapable of doing anything but doubling down on the parasitism of the dead host.

    Therein lies the material basis of today's Clown World.

    Replies: @Robert Dolan, @Doctor, My Eyes

    Nice assist but it’s still just propaganda.

  • @Richard B
    @Truth Vigilante

    Great video share (and comment)!

    Probably not even the full story. But good thing she shared that much. And there's Larry King laughing along with her, though no doubt with a different intent and emphasis.

    The one story, out of the many, that really gets me is what the revolting Kirk Douglas did to Natalie Wood - when she was 15! At one point even shouting You're fucking a Jew! When what he should have said was You're being raped by a Jew! But honesty has never been viewed by them as the best policy. Ever.

    In any event, his reason for raping her, or for justifying the rape, and it truly was brutal in every sense of that word, is that her grandfather fought the Bolsheviks during the revolution and Kirk, of course, was on the side of the Bolsheviks, and so that, in his warped Jewish Supremacist mind, made her an antisemite who deserved it.

    The Dark Triad is synonymous with Jewish Supremacy Inc. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_triad

    By the way, check out how the term has been modified by Wiki (now referred to as non-pathological, even though psychopathy is one of the attributes of TDT).

    The modification is recent because they know full well that TDT has been making the rounds online and is often attributed to Jewish behavior - for a reason. Since they exhibit the patterns in such an vivid and striking manner, and on such a consistent basis. To use their own repulsive jargon, it's what they do because it's who they are.

    Replies: @Truth Vigilante

    I wasn’t aware of the Kirk Douglas molestation of Natalie Wood as a child. Of course it doesn’t surprise me that he and his tribe get up to these things.

    Thanks for that and the bit about TDT – it certainly does describe the behaviour of a good many of them.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Zumbuddi
    @Truth Vigilante

    Just plain ignorant that "Machiavelli" is included -- impugned, really -- in describing psychopathology.
  • @Blissex
    @Bro43rd

    «Maybe 5% but 20-40% is ludicrous.»

    Well, that's the percentage of voters who have been voting for bigger share and real estate prices and lower labor costs, and those who have seen their real estate prices double every 7-10 years.

    «Some of us in the top quintile worked (masonry) hard & saved to get here.»

    Howe exactly did your hard work cause a doubling of real estate (and stock) prices every 7-10 years in so many "lucky ducky" areas? In the financial jargon, that's called "passive" investment for a reason.
    And a lot of that 20-40% are retired people, who don't work at all, they just enjoy the massive amounts that asset price inflation delivers to them, entirely work-free, and usually also tax-free.

    But suppose that you earned entirely your fortune with your own work, then you would agree it would be fair for taxing 100% of capital gains on property and stocks, because those are unearned. Would you?

    Replies: @shadowy_figure

    I haven’t got a lot of real estate but I benefited from stock prices going way up. I confess that I think a lot of my ill-gotten gains are due to the progressive economic policies of the government. When the government said it was going to do some quantitative easing, it went straight into the greedy mouths of the banks. Where we’re not seeing eye, is on the subject of blame. I didn’t vote for any of this crap. I was/am an inadvertent beneficiary, and I think that a good many people fit into this category. Now that the government is finding new ways to spend money that bypasses the financial sector, inflation is now finding it’s way into consumables.

    I think that some of the proposed methods of curing the inflation disease could do even more harm to the the patient. More taxation would curb inflation a bit since it takes money out of the economy but, it with net taxation for some people already over 50%, taxation at such a high rate will do other types of economic damage and may even result in less government revenue in the end due to perverse economic effects, and we have to believe that the government won’t see the new revenue as an excuse to spend more. We live inside a managerial state that sees wealth transfer between population groups as a holy imperative.

    My advice to people is just to own stuff that won’t get clobbered if hyperinflation comes, and I think that hyperinflation will come.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Blissex
    @shadowy_figure

    «I didn’t vote for any of this crap. I was/am an inadvertent beneficiary»

    Your personal experience is important for you, but I don't think it is that common, a lot of people utterly rely on their massive real estate and share [rice profits to finance their lifestyles (refis for example) or their future retirement, and vote accordingly.

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-22/opendoor-open-faces-an-expensive-path-to-profitability-in-real-estate
    «From the minute the average couple buys a home they're constantly calculating how much they'll make when they sell it, and most won't sell for much less once that day comes.»

    https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-financial-110217-023036
    «evidence, which suggests that inflated house-price expectations across the economy played a central role in driving both the demand for and the supply of mortgage credit before the crisis. The great misnomer of the 2008 crisis is that it was not a subprime crisis but rather a middle-class crisis. Inflated house-price expectations led households across all income groups, especially the middle class, to increase their demand for housing and mortgage leverage.»

    http://www.enterstageright.com/archive/articles/0903/0903norquistinterview.htm
    «The growth of the investor class -- those 70 per cent of voters who own stock and are more opposed to taxes and regulations on business as a result -- is strengthening the conservative movement. More gun owners, fewer labor union members, more homeschoolers, more property owners and a dwindling number of FDR-era Democrats all strengthen the conservative movement versus the Democrats.»
    [...] But going into November, what actually saved it for the Republicans was the investor vote, which went heavily R. Why? One, they didn't blame Bush for the collapse of the bubble. They were mad at having lower stock prices and 401(k)s, but they didn't say Bush did this and that caused this. Secondly, the Democratic solution was to sic the trial lawyers on Enron and finish it off. No no no no no. We want our market caps to go back up, not low. [...] The 1930s rhetoric was bash business -- only a handful of bankers thought that meant them. Now if you say we're going to smash the big corporations, 60-plus percent of voters say "That's my retirement you're messing with. I don't appreciate that". And the Democrats have spent 50 years explaining that Republicans will pollute the earth and kill baby seals to get market caps higher. And in 2002, voters said, “We're sorry about the seals and everything but we really got to get the stock market up.»
  • People sink into their imaginations and delusional fantasy worlds in order to protect their psyche that has been under attack ever since the Civil War ended…right up to present day.
    Snordster points this out in reading Les Visible’s ‘The Roach Motel at the End of the Universe’. re;
    “the good life they never had…”
    From going to ‘Church’ on Sundays, with Saturday cook-outs, Sting Ray bikes for the kids, Dad gets a payraise, it’s ALL BEEN A FUCKING LIE!!!
    & Military Service? ‘Military men are cattle (goyim) to be used!” -Henry Kissinger
    “It was all a lie, and the more I saw this, the more I hated them” -Capt Willard from ‘Apocalypse Now’.

  • One of the reasons why there are so many unhappy and restless people in this country, is that the culture has taught them that they can be anything they wish to be, have anything they want, irrespective of intelligence or ability. (Certainly, external circumstance will play a part in anyone’s success or failure – but not a very big one.)

    The important thing is to think critically, and become adult enough to know one’s own capacities.

  • @Dave Bowman
    @Emma S.


    If I was a recent immigrant, I would probably feel safer and more comfortable going home
    �
    Ahh ... Yes, indeed.

    If only the immigrants - legal AND illegal - were that intelligent. Or honest.

    But they ain't.

    Replies: @Gary Sudder

    When it comes to immigrants, they will never admit their country and USA are same. They will argue how beautiful USA is and how bad life in their countries is. They cannot accept that life sucks in US because that would be hypocrisy, as then natural question comes is why don’t they go back if they believe life is same in their own country. Even those who criticize US are told to go back to their country if they don’t like it in the “greatest country on Earth.” They are all addicted to greed and won’t listen to anything contrarian to the dominant narrative. They will suck it up and die in US as long as they can hustle on and have hope of becoming a billionaire some day, with a lux car, and big house to show off to their friends ‘back in the native land’.

    The vast majority of USian immigrants love the empire. US brainwashing/propaganda is very strong. Their identity is wrapped in the red, white, and blue bullshit mythologies. Look at EU puppets, they wax poetic abt ‘dear america’ etc.etc. willfully buy-in. And they deserve what they get and will be getting.

    So, let the USian immigrants enthusiastically swallow the porcupine and become wedded to US empire’s lies. They can blindly “dick ride” whatever is being offered by the most amazing incredible place on God’s green Earth…

    A US immigrant who is a thinking person of reasonable intellect, knows the real deal ( history, cultural etc., ) and values who they are as person-ontologically—would leave the US, and NEVER return to that gigantic mistake.

  • @Emma S.
    The American dream is largely the American nightmare looking at contemporary America. If I was a recent immigrant, I would probably feel safer and more comfortable going home.

    Replies: @Chris Mallory, @Dave Bowman

    If I was a recent immigrant, I would probably feel safer and more comfortable going home

    Ahh … Yes, indeed.

    If only the immigrants – legal AND illegal – were that intelligent. Or honest.

    But they ain’t.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Gary Sudder
    @Dave Bowman

    When it comes to immigrants, they will never admit their country and USA are same. They will argue how beautiful USA is and how bad life in their countries is. They cannot accept that life sucks in US because that would be hypocrisy, as then natural question comes is why don't they go back if they believe life is same in their own country. Even those who criticize US are told to go back to their country if they don't like it in the "greatest country on Earth." They are all addicted to greed and won't listen to anything contrarian to the dominant narrative. They will suck it up and die in US as long as they can hustle on and have hope of becoming a billionaire some day, with a lux car, and big house to show off to their friends 'back in the native land'.

    The vast majority of USian immigrants love the empire. US brainwashing/propaganda is very strong. Their identity is wrapped in the red, white, and blue bullshit mythologies. Look at EU puppets, they wax poetic abt 'dear america' etc.etc. willfully buy-in. And they deserve what they get and will be getting.

    So, let the USian immigrants enthusiastically swallow the porcupine and become wedded to US empire's lies. They can blindly "dick ride" whatever is being offered by the most amazing incredible place on God's green Earth...

    A US immigrant who is a thinking person of reasonable intellect, knows the real deal ( history, cultural etc., ) and values who they are as person-ontologically---would leave the US, and NEVER return to that gigantic mistake.
  • The dream mythology–the greatest marketing scam ever sold. Ingenious. You get starry eyed immigrants-clueless abt US empire history/reality/high on US propaganda—-and sell em on the dreams, hopes, bullshit. Just as Filipinos, Taiwanese, Italians, Aussies, Brits, Germans, and other US immigrants abt their “love” of that dream. They jibber the jabber chapter and verse. They really believe and ‘have’ to. It’s all they got.

    Add in some Horatio Alger propaganda, and you get an endless supply of cheap labor to be used and abused in the amazing employment at will dumping ground. Exploited and oppressed for US capitalism. It’s the garbage collector of the world! So, come on down, and get a front row seat to the cesspool. Wave a flag, and have nitrate/nitrite hot doggy, and get ready to be screwed doggy style bc…

    Someday, that ship will come in with riches….the USian proletariats do not see themselves as exploited people. They are temporarily embarrassed millionaires all hoping, dreaming, hustling, huckstering that someday, they’ll get the lux car and mansion…(paraphrased-John Steinbeck).

    The US empire was a business enterprise masquerading as a “country.” Spin hamsters, spin. Enjoy swallowing that porcupine.

  • Anon[224] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:
    July 29, 2022 at 6:12 pm GMT •ï¿½100 Words

    Larry the lolcow got pissed off because most of us laughed at his leftoid high-speed rail articles. So now he triples-down on his I-hate-America shtick. We’re a pack of evil cretins, per Larry!

    Cool it, Larry. You’re starting to sound like an Arab.

  • @Colinsky
    @frankie p

    Was Zelenskyy's appearance in Vogue better than Kamala's spread?

    Replies: @Notsofast, @Anon

    You ruined my appetite for the day by writing “Kamala’s spread.”

  • @Treg
    While Larry has a very grounded view of America and Americans, here is this South African man who has a grounded view on China.. He moved to China in his early 20's and lived and worked there for the next 15 years. During his 15 + years there, he learned the language, toured the cities and countryside, and married a Chinese woman. He has a very grounded understanding of China and its people. Here he is with his latest video talking about how China has just lost the space race. https://youtu.be/cB55t_ByGpo

    Replies: @Jonathan Revusky, @Showmethereal

    Serpentza is just that … A serpent. Never had a bad word to say about China – until he left. Now he makes up nonsense (I’m sure he makes money from more than just YouTube paying him out..) because it feeds the egos of insecure westerners. If China was as horrible as he now claims – how come it took 15 years to figure it out…?? The guy and his friend are both crocs

  • Larry do a story about Maine!!

    Whitest state in these United States! 🇺🇸

  • @RoatanBill
    @TimMcGraw

    You were doing fine until your last paragraph where you want to again get on your knees to gov't. Are you so inept that you can't control the things you're responsible for? Do you think your neighbors are so inept to deal with their things that some "other" is needed? Why is it that you want another group of criminals to write the rules you are forced to live by due to men in blue acting as thugs?

    Gov't is illegitimate. Here's the proof.

    If your neighbor can't demand money from you for what it is he wants to accomplish and if the entire neighborhood can't demand money from you for what they want to accomplish, at what specific number of individuals does it become the right of that mob to demand money from you? Gov't is the mob. Gov't is an extortion ring, mafia.

    If your neighbor can't write some stuff on a piece of paper and demand you obey and your entire neighborhood can't write their demand on a piece of paper and demand you obey, at what specific number of individuals does that mob legitimately have the right to tell you how to live your life?

    No one can give away authority they don't have to begin with. Authority doesn't spontaneously appear when 10, 100, 1000 or a million people without a specific authority get together. That they claim that authority magically appears from nowhere is the entire concept of gov't, and it is a fraud.

    Replies: @Brian Damage

    “If your neighbor can’t demand money from you for what it is he wants to accomplish and if the entire neighborhood can’t demand money from you for what they want to accomplish, at what specific number of individuals does it become the right of that mob to demand money from you? Gov’t is the mob. Gov’t is an extortion ring, mafia.”

    Think of it as a condo or HOA. Everyone who lives in it has to contribute for the maintenance of the complex.

    But when the US neglects to upkeep the infrastructure, creating a better healthcare, provides a safer community, instead spent disproportionate amount of tax dollars on the military, enriching big pharma…, it is like a giant HOA letting the complex rot while spending owner contributions on security guards and getting kickbacks from vendors and suppliers. And, after exhausting all the owners’ funds, started borrowing from other HOAs at the same time hiring more security guards to harass other HOAs.

    Just so it can claim to be the TOP HOA.

  • Richard B says:
    July 29, 2022 at 3:04 pm GMT •ï¿½300 Words
    @Truth Vigilante
    @Michael Korn

    What you refer to as a 'fascinating documentary' is nothing but pure propaganda designed to portray these movie mogul Jews in a positive light - when in fact they were just vile and debauched degenerates.

    Check out the interview below of Shirley Temple where she tells of her experience with a Jewish movie mogul when she was a 12yr old child (watch the 1 min or so from 12:20 - 14:00):

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_KacEMBJg0

    These people were scum and if you were sucked in by that obvious bit of propaganda Mevashir, it's an indictment of your gullibility.

    Replies: @Richard B

    Great video share (and comment)!

    Probably not even the full story. But good thing she shared that much. And there’s Larry King laughing along with her, though no doubt with a different intent and emphasis.

    The one story, out of the many, that really gets me is what the revolting Kirk Douglas did to Natalie Wood – when she was 15! At one point even shouting You’re fucking a Jew! When what he should have said was You’re being raped by a Jew! But honesty has never been viewed by them as the best policy. Ever.

    In any event, his reason for raping her, or for justifying the rape, and it truly was brutal in every sense of that word, is that her grandfather fought the Bolsheviks during the revolution and Kirk, of course, was on the side of the Bolsheviks, and so that, in his warped Jewish Supremacist mind, made her an antisemite who deserved it.

    The Dark Triad is synonymous with Jewish Supremacy Inc. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_triad

    By the way, check out how the term has been modified by Wiki (now referred to as non-pathological, even though psychopathy is one of the attributes of TDT).

    The modification is recent because they know full well that TDT has been making the rounds online and is often attributed to Jewish behavior – for a reason. Since they exhibit the patterns in such an vivid and striking manner, and on such a consistent basis. To use their own repulsive jargon, it’s what they do because it’s who they are.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Truth Vigilante
    @Richard B

    I wasn't aware of the Kirk Douglas molestation of Natalie Wood as a child. Of course it doesn't surprise me that he and his tribe get up to these things.

    Thanks for that and the bit about TDT - it certainly does describe the behaviour of a good many of them.

    Replies: @Zumbuddi
  • Blissex says:
    @Bro43rd
    @Blissex

    Maybe 5% but 20-40% is ludicrous. Some of us in the top quintile worked (masonry) hard & saved to get here. And inflation is kicking our asses too. There is a rentier class and it's the .01%. The rest of us are along for the ride & have no choice in the matter.

    Replies: @Blissex

    «Maybe 5% but 20-40% is ludicrous.»

    Well, that’s the percentage of voters who have been voting for bigger share and real estate prices and lower labor costs, and those who have seen their real estate prices double every 7-10 years.

    «Some of us in the top quintile worked (masonry) hard & saved to get here.»

    Howe exactly did your hard work cause a doubling of real estate (and stock) prices every 7-10 years in so many “lucky ducky” areas? In the financial jargon, that’s called “passive” investment for a reason.
    And a lot of that 20-40% are retired people, who don’t work at all, they just enjoy the massive amounts that asset price inflation delivers to them, entirely work-free, and usually also tax-free.

    But suppose that you earned entirely your fortune with your own work, then you would agree it would be fair for taxing 100% of capital gains on property and stocks, because those are unearned. Would you?

    •ï¿½Replies: @shadowy_figure
    @Blissex

    I haven't got a lot of real estate but I benefited from stock prices going way up. I confess that I think a lot of my ill-gotten gains are due to the progressive economic policies of the government. When the government said it was going to do some quantitative easing, it went straight into the greedy mouths of the banks. Where we're not seeing eye, is on the subject of blame. I didn't vote for any of this crap. I was/am an inadvertent beneficiary, and I think that a good many people fit into this category. Now that the government is finding new ways to spend money that bypasses the financial sector, inflation is now finding it's way into consumables.

    I think that some of the proposed methods of curing the inflation disease could do even more harm to the the patient. More taxation would curb inflation a bit since it takes money out of the economy but, it with net taxation for some people already over 50%, taxation at such a high rate will do other types of economic damage and may even result in less government revenue in the end due to perverse economic effects, and we have to believe that the government won't see the new revenue as an excuse to spend more. We live inside a managerial state that sees wealth transfer between population groups as a holy imperative.

    My advice to people is just to own stuff that won't get clobbered if hyperinflation comes, and I think that hyperinflation will come.

    Replies: @Blissex
  • Blissex says:
    @Wade
    I generally like Larry's pieces ever since they began to be published here. But why am I sensing such a strong animosity directed towards the US public rather than where it mostly deserves to be: on US leadership and media?

    I certainly don't mind taking criticisms but considering that the US nation (the actual people) are up against the most dangerous, powerful and sophisticated criminal cartel in the history of humanity that once enslaved eastern Europe through the USSR, and who took control of our financial system and media over 100 years ago (arguably further back), you'd think Larry's pieces could show a little pathos as Americans are learning this for the first time and just how evil they are. Lies about WWI and WWII were hard for the public to detect prior to the internet. Our criminal elite's truly grotesque (and more obvious) turning on the public happened slowly and gradually until 911. From there it went on a rapid down hill slide.

    Now they are looking for a new host to parasitize, and if China has truly rejected their overtures to be that new host, then this might be the perfect opportunity to expose them once and for all since there's no where for them to run. I'd expect the global community would want to encourage us in our awakening in all things political, economic, religious and spiritual. Instead I think Larry wants the parasite to die from an untimely demise of the host before it makes an escape.

    The American Dream wasn't always bullshit. Thomas Jefferson made the Lousiana purchase and thousands of Americans got to homestead land and farm their own food, create businesses and build a real economy. This was such a better opportunity than what the average Englishman had. Freedom was real. People were really happy. They didn't want to fight WWI and WWII or offshore factories to poorer nations or drone on about "American Exceptionalism". That was part of "The Big Lie" meant to get Americans to except an American Empire that they never asked for or wanted.

    The two party system has to be destroyed and we need a non-interest bearing currency, or banking as a national service, so we can establish a real economy again and stop the parasitizing of the US and other other nations by the banking cartel.

    Replies: @RoatanBill, @A B Coreopsis, @Blissex

    «such a strong animosity directed towards the US public rather than where it mostly deserves to be: on US leadership and media?»

    That “animosity” is well justified: the USA corporate oligarchs and their minions in politics are corrupt because much of the USA population is even more corrupt. For every self-dealing CEO or senator, there are thousands or millions of usians who would love to be able to be corrupt on the same massive scale, because “winners do whatever it takes”. Two quotes, the first from Alexis de Tocqueville, 1834:

    «Consequently, in the United States the law favors those classes that elsewhere are most interested in evading it. […] In America there is no law against fraudulent bankruptcies, not because they are few, but because they are many. The dread of being prosecuted as a bankrupt is greater in the minds of the majority than the fear of being ruined by the bankruptcy of others; and a sort of guilty tolerance is extended by the public conscience to an offense which everyone condemns in his individual capacity.»

    The second from Newt Gingrich, 1995:

    «If you have a society where almost every middle class person routinely fudges the law, that’s telling us something. We have laws that matter – murder, rape, and we have laws that don’t matter. The first thing that every good American says each morning is “What’s the angle?†“How can I get around it?†“What does my lawyer think?†“There must be a loophole!†[…] America is the most incentive-driven society on the planet.»

  • @TimMcGraw
    So much has and continues to be written about the failed American "experiment." I love the Unz site; it provides a formidable juxtaposition to the drivel that trickles out of western civilization, and makes me think. The quibbles I have with the content, are that it is, one, heavy on the Antisemitism, a form of which I don't care for. Opportunistic. Like the excesses of banks, dominated by Jews, is representative of Jews as a whole. When excesses become apparent, it's easy to throw stones, But I don't buy it. And worse, two, it lumps the entire American population into a nice convenient box of abused coal miners or cotton pickers or service workers, unaware of how much they are abused and mistreated by the corrupt American system of government. A bunch of rubes. I don't buy that, either.

    I live in a heavily blue state, Illinois. Good schools, high level of college graduates, and more. And even here, people can easily, in casual conversation, make a distinction between the corrupted creeps that walk the halls of the plaster, rather than marble, walls of the Illinois capital building (as in cheap facade) and serious politicians who want to improve the lives of the people in society.

    There is a wide wide chasm between the locals who really want a better society, and Washington ideals. And an even wider chasm on how to get there. Obama's "fundamental change" was absolute bullshit to well over 150m Americans, and the voting segment refuted the agenda in 2016. Whether it won or had victory torn away, is one thing. But the 150 didn't vote for the nonsense manifest in the article, and the point I want to make is the 150m, I think more, would be just fine with trimming the government by maybe 75%, hanging all or most of the pols who oversaw Covid and 2008 financial collapse and FBI school shootings, and all the rest. And start over.

    But here's the tricky part, and where the author is confused. The American experiment started with a Declaration, following a long train of abuses. Only then, after numerous attempts to seek redress, did the population rise up and take care of business. Then, America became a country. Currently, our problems are not a failure of the idea: it's a failure of will. And a reluctance to risk the destruction of a system that would work, and quite well, thank you very much, without all the corruption. And I'm almost ashamed to say, it's our fault, for reelecting the same non-serious flawed people over and over. But please don't bury America. It's not going away. After all, Russia survived how many years of Tyranny?

    America, it once was the "Land of the Free, Home of the Brave." And will be again. But, and it's a big but, there has to be a new government, with new, fresh ideas, waiting in the wings, organized under a Constitution. All we need to do is identify the "Brave." They are out there. And if things get any worse, the world will hear from them.

    Replies: @RoatanBill, @Eric Novak

    You were doing fine until your last paragraph where you want to again get on your knees to gov’t. Are you so inept that you can’t control the things you’re responsible for? Do you think your neighbors are so inept to deal with their things that some “other” is needed? Why is it that you want another group of criminals to write the rules you are forced to live by due to men in blue acting as thugs?

    Gov’t is illegitimate. Here’s the proof.

    If your neighbor can’t demand money from you for what it is he wants to accomplish and if the entire neighborhood can’t demand money from you for what they want to accomplish, at what specific number of individuals does it become the right of that mob to demand money from you? Gov’t is the mob. Gov’t is an extortion ring, mafia.

    If your neighbor can’t write some stuff on a piece of paper and demand you obey and your entire neighborhood can’t write their demand on a piece of paper and demand you obey, at what specific number of individuals does that mob legitimately have the right to tell you how to live your life?

    No one can give away authority they don’t have to begin with. Authority doesn’t spontaneously appear when 10, 100, 1000 or a million people without a specific authority get together. That they claim that authority magically appears from nowhere is the entire concept of gov’t, and it is a fraud.

    •ï¿½Agree: Truth Vigilante
    •ï¿½Replies: @Brian Damage
    @RoatanBill

    "If your neighbor can’t demand money from you for what it is he wants to accomplish and if the entire neighborhood can’t demand money from you for what they want to accomplish, at what specific number of individuals does it become the right of that mob to demand money from you? Gov’t is the mob. Gov’t is an extortion ring, mafia."

    Think of it as a condo or HOA. Everyone who lives in it has to contribute for the maintenance of the complex.

    But when the US neglects to upkeep the infrastructure, creating a better healthcare, provides a safer community, instead spent disproportionate amount of tax dollars on the military, enriching big pharma..., it is like a giant HOA letting the complex rot while spending owner contributions on security guards and getting kickbacks from vendors and suppliers. And, after exhausting all the owners' funds, started borrowing from other HOAs at the same time hiring more security guards to harass other HOAs.

    Just so it can claim to be the TOP HOA.
  • @Anonymous
    @Mac_

    Not that simple. Cause of death for hunter-gatherer men was about half homicide.

    See argument:
    https://www.rewild.com/in-depth/peace.html

    Replies: @RoatanBill

    How would anyone know about what the cause of death was for folks that lived before writing and cameras were invented? Any assertion of such knowledge is just guess work without evidence, aka bullshit.

  • @anonymous
    Tho it wouldn't be generally possible for huge numbers to emulate in the USA, one nonetheless has many, many stories of immigrants recently arriving in America with little or no resources, who yet achieve success as millionaire mini-capitalists over the space of a few years, principally from amongst various groups of Asians. Components of their success include:
    - Hugely long-hours and hard work others won't do
    - Pooling resources with relatives or co-ethnic immigrants to enable capitalist acquisition of assets, in both business-owning and real estate
    - Living for a time in crowded, group-home, bunk-bed circumstances whites wouldn't tolerate, whilst assets are gathered
    - A certain ruthlessness regarding, and focus upon, what makes money, most all else pushed to the side
    - Utter willingness to exploit identifiable opportunities such as government contracts, affirmative action etc
    - Knowing how to confuse and evade authorities ('My English no good!') when questions are asked about dodgy conduct

    From the point of view of these 'millionaire from nothing within 10 years' immigrants, the white-heritage Americans 'just don't have the drive' to do what they do. Whites are overall inclined to less-demanding life patterns, their usual 'best' is just entering a profession where upper-middle class incomes are frequent, such as health care, or, to a lesser extent, lawyers (i.e., many of the USA's 1-million-plus lawyers are surplus, and do not have a high-income future)

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Justvisiting, @James Scott, @profnasty, @mocissepvis, @Eric Novak

    You want prosperity?
    Six year olds Suzy and Johnny approached Suzy’s father. Johnny said, “Suzy and me are going to get married. ”
    Dad chuckled. “Have you considered children?”
    Johnny, “Yes. If Suzy lays any eggs we’re gonna step on ’em.”

  • There is no “American Dream”. Only the American delusion.

    The 1950s was not sustainable. When you have pretty much most of the world devastated by WW2 and the only intact country capable and large enough to supply and manufacture for the rest of the world, is the US. Most industries around the world were gone. Most infrastructures were gone.

    It only take a few decades for most of the world to rebuild. Once that rebuilding is done, that “American Dream” is gone. How to keep that “Dream” going? By printing money, by borrowing, by disrupting the growth of perceived adversaries.

    •ï¿½Agree: Truth Vigilante
  • @Larry Romanoff
    Several readers have made reference to life in the US during the 50s and 60s, in the sense of The American Dream having actually existed in those days. They are essentially correct, but lack the understanding of the background cause of the appearance and dissolution of those circumstances. For those interested, here is an article which might illucidate the issue. The matter is crucially important but tragically misunderstood.

    https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/history-of-americas-labor-movement-october-17-2019/

    Replies: @Truth Vigilante

    Several readers have made reference to life in the US during the 50s and 60s, in the sense of The American Dream having actually existed in those days.

    Whether the American Dream existed or not, one thing that IS certain is that many Americans are living the American Nightmare today courtesy of the untold sums that are being doled out to fund BIG GOVERNMENT and the boondoggles devised by these parasitic bureaucrats.
    Things like:

    1) Subsidies and grants, government contracts for Green Energy swindles in pursuit of remedying a NON-PROBLEM. ie: the rise in CO2 levels.
    2) Vast sums expended on the Military-Industrial-Security-Surveillance State to maintain the illusory empire and hegemonic aspirations that America has no chance of retaining.
    3) Loans to college students (the Federal government, or should I say the taxpayers, are on the hook for something that is fast approaching $2 trillion) – most of whom will never have the capacity to pay it back seeing as they got liberal arts degrees or majored in the humanities and thus will not be earning that much as waitresses or cab drivers because they have no marketable skills.

    Anyway, to pay for this BIG GOVERNMENT the Fed has printed trillions and thus the American working class will be picking up the tab for said profligacy in the form of runaway inflation.
    Peter Schiff explains (5 min video):


    Video Link

  • @Anonymous
    The American Dream was once real enough, however much of a facade it may have been. In addition to the class issue, there's also a generational issue. A case can be made that it was largely destroyed at the hands of one generation, the baby boomers. Despite their constant lies and gaslighting that millennials actually have things much, much easier, we can see that by nearly every measure, the country has gotten worse on their watch.

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/JUoeWG6Xzdvt/

    https://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2017/03/08/bruce-gibney-sociopaths-baby-boomers

    How Baby Boomers stole Trillions of Dollars from Millennials
    https://www.demos.org/blog/how-baby-boomers-stole-trillions-dollars-millennials

    Millennials and zoomers must learn to unite in solidarity against the corrupt, sclerotic, boomer gerontocracy and culture of generational theft. If reasonable measures aren't taken to ameliorate it, they should aim to de-fund the boomers, and at minimum vote away the boomers' pensions, medicare, and social security. Boomers hypocritically claim to hate welfare, except when it benefits boomers.

    Replies: @Reverend Goody, @Bro43rd, @Richard B, @profnasty

    Many boomers lived a generous life because the parents murdered their own children, in Germany. It was a deal made with the Devil.
    Millennials murder their unborn. This should be enough to provide prosperity.
    So, have a good time! You’ve earned it.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Zumbuddi
    @profnasty


    Many boomers lived a generous life because the parents murdered their own children, in Germany. It was a deal made with the Devil.
    �
    Gibney -- pulled himself up by his bootstraps, didn't he:

    Gibney started investing when his Stanford University roommate Ken Howery co-founded PayPal, the electronic payments company, and offered Gibney the chance to buy "friends and family" shares.[3] After investing in PayPal, Gibney worked as a litigator but was soon hired by Peter Thiel after Thiel sold PayPal to eBay in 2002.

    Gibney worked at Thiel's hedge fund, Clarium, until 2008, making occasional private investments including in Palantir Technologies in 2005 and later in DeepMind, which was acquired by Google for around $450 million in 2014. He then moved to Founders Fund, a venture capital fund started by Thiel. Thiel and Founders Fund were the earliest outside investors in Facebook, SpaceX, and Palantir, and made other investments including in AirBnB, Lyft, Spotify, and Stemcentrx, which AbbVie acquired for $10 billion a few years after Founders Fund's investment. -wikipedia
    �
    Fascinating that Gibney's narrative begins in 1946, AFTER "Boomers parents" -- the Greatest Generation -- were FORCED [WWII fighters were drafted] to kill their European forebears in wars provoked by- and for the benefit of- Jewish zionists as well as the American financial class that Romanoff excoriated.

    iow, Gibney would know well how to spot a sociopath: someone who looks like him. Or Peter Thiel. Or Alex Karp, the deviant, Frankfurt school-loving co-founder of Palantir.
  • @Kratoklastes
    @Truth Vigilante

    The only quibble I have with what you just wrote, is that it uses 'capitalism' as if it's the same as 'free enterprise'. I know that's become the 'common' usage, but it's not the original usage (in Thackeray).

    In Thackeray's use of the word, 'capitalism' implies the use of concentrated capital to gain political and economic advantage for the owner of capital: capitalists is almost interchangeable with oligarch.

    In other words, the aim of the capitalist is to turn as much of the system as possible into a Vampire Squid: the larger the proportion of the 'private' sector that organises itself that way, the more the system becomes a mechanism for transferring productivity upwards.

    China is the world’s leading free enterprise country - whereas the US is increasingly capitalist.

    China is not politically pluralist - you only get a choice of one political party. It is increasingly economically pluralist - you can have a crack at whatever sector you want.

    Part of the reforms put in place by Deng Xiaoping were totally predicated on the idea that people will accept one-party rule (political non-pluralism), so long as the economic system is delivering tangibly rising living standards - which requires economic pluralism.

    And part of Deng's thesis was that the State (and the Party) had to guard against corruption: the State had to make a serious effort to identify corruption within its ranks, and had to punish it brutally (expropriation followed by execution - none of this 'pay a fine and admit no fault' bullshit).

    Compare that to "10% for the Big Guy", which is such a beautiful allegory for American capitalism that it makes my eyes water.

    So China has managed to lift its population out of poverty since 1990 in numbers that are staggering: the number of people raised out of poverty is about equal to â…”rds of the entire population of the Earth in 1900.

    And now they've got 7nm chip fabs - which brings their chip sector up to current. The US has been trying to prevent China from getting on par in chip manufacture for 30 years; the primary reason why people were concerned about China exerting itself over Taiwan, is that it would give them access to TSMC's lithography tools.

    Guess what? They don't need TSMC's lithography tools.

    This should have crushed AMD and Intel's stock prices, but it hasn't yet.

    China can now set up fabs to replace $300b worth of semiconductor imports - and it will. Then it will turn around and begin to compete against Western producers, behaving like good free-enterprise folks... just as the Little Helmsman would have wanted.

    Replies: @Truth Vigilante, @Che Guava, @Showmethereal

    The irony is the people who run SMIC are alums of TSMC. In fact if you look at even minor semiconductor companies on Mainland China such as even Powerchip – they are full of Taiwan engineers who moved to mainland China. All the US Politicans who talk the “freedom†talk should ask all those engineers how and why they chose to move from the island to the Mainland when they supposedly hate them. Nancy Pelosi should go talk to them instead of these stunts she supposedly wants to pull in going to visit Taipei and risk a war. Politics is stupid .
    Oh and now the US wants to pressure ASML to not sell even the DUV lithography machines. Someone forgot that Samsung and TSMC started their own 7nm on DUV machines. I guess they really believe that garbage that you can’t innovate unless you live in a liberal democracy.

  • Let’s see:

    China good. American Christians bad (and stupid).

    2100 words and the word “jew” can’t be found.

    Sounds to me as if Larry is a tool of the jew.

  • @Truth Vigilante
    Larry Romanoff writes:

    ... it is the quality of China’s leaders, the fact of China’s one-party government system, and China’s unique version of socialist capitalism that have made this possible.

    �
    There is no example of a successful nation that employed 'Socialist Capitalism' (ie: both philosophies employed in EQUAL measure), in all of human history.

    To the extent that there exist some Communist Maoist hardliners in the party that believe in centralised government planning and Socialism, and to the extent that they've funnelled countless billions into loss making state owned enterprises (SOE's) that are haemorrhaging red ink (as are the hundreds of billions wasted on building ghost cities, highways and high speed rail to nowhere), all of these losses are more than compensated for by the productive Chinese private sector.

    At least that's been the case so far. Of course a tipping point may occur where losses sustained from crackpot government bureaucratic central planning overcomes the private sector's dynamism and when that occurs, China will be in for a world of hurt.

    Importantly Larry, your article does not address the REASON for why the 1% have managed to siphon off America's wealth in the present era.
    After all, there have always been schemers and chisellers in every era and there's no proof that said grifters are any more egregious today than in any previous period.

    What is it that has ENABLED the 1% to siphon off the wealth of America ?

    Of course it is the elephant in the room that you refuse to address.
    It is none other than BIG GOVERNMENT.

    Why is it that the U.S is capable of spending over a trillion dollars per year on the Military-Industrial-Security/Surveillance state complex ?

    It is because they've managed to extract said money (for the most part) from taxpayers.

    If government is TINY, and by definition this can only happen if taxes are minimal, said government can only get up to so much mischief.

    CHINA IS THAT LOW TAXING GOVERNMENT.

    You can get ahead in China because you keep the bulk of what you earn. There is no crushing regulatory burden on businesses that prevents new entrants from taking market share from the established oligarchs. There is no regulatory burden that forces employers to employ minorities and have racial/gender/sexual preference diversity that necessarily entails that the best qualified candidate for said job is often not hired - thus reducing productivity.

    There is no excess of finite capital that supports layer upon layer of parasitic bureaucracy as there is in the U.S and other western nations.

    Spending on government as proportion of GDP in China is FAR LOWER than in the U.S.

    China is the world's leading capitalist country.

    Bottom Line: Larry, you and I are both in agreement that the present system in the U.S is a disaster and it needs to be abolished.
    But Larry, you FAIL to identify the culprit.

    Older commenters here in the UR will remember a time when a typical family lived comfortably with a single breadwinner in the household, a time when there were no tent cities comprised of the homeless, a time when countless numbers of homeless were not found sleeping under freeway overpasses etc.

    But is was GOVERNMENT that off-shored American manufacturing jobs, it was government that allowed tens of millions of undocumented migrants to cross the border, it was the government that engaged and provoked these endless foreign military misadventures, it was government that allowed the creation of the Federal Reserve and ownership of it to a private Zionist cartel.
    �
    America was once a bastion of capitalism and life was good then.
    It no longer is. Today it is a Socialist Surveillance state and hence a shit-hole in many places - and fast becoming that way in those enclaves remaining that still have some normality.

    Replies: @sonofman, @animalogic, @Levtraro, @Kratoklastes, @JR Foley, @A B Coreopsis, @Marcali, @TPM, @Showmethereal, @profnasty, @mocissepvis

    Yup. It’s just as Alan Greenspan said.
    “We don’t need the SEC, the market regulates itself.”
    I think he said that in 2007.

  • @Truth Vigilante
    Larry Romanoff writes:

    ... it is the quality of China’s leaders, the fact of China’s one-party government system, and China’s unique version of socialist capitalism that have made this possible.

    �
    There is no example of a successful nation that employed 'Socialist Capitalism' (ie: both philosophies employed in EQUAL measure), in all of human history.

    To the extent that there exist some Communist Maoist hardliners in the party that believe in centralised government planning and Socialism, and to the extent that they've funnelled countless billions into loss making state owned enterprises (SOE's) that are haemorrhaging red ink (as are the hundreds of billions wasted on building ghost cities, highways and high speed rail to nowhere), all of these losses are more than compensated for by the productive Chinese private sector.

    At least that's been the case so far. Of course a tipping point may occur where losses sustained from crackpot government bureaucratic central planning overcomes the private sector's dynamism and when that occurs, China will be in for a world of hurt.

    Importantly Larry, your article does not address the REASON for why the 1% have managed to siphon off America's wealth in the present era.
    After all, there have always been schemers and chisellers in every era and there's no proof that said grifters are any more egregious today than in any previous period.

    What is it that has ENABLED the 1% to siphon off the wealth of America ?

    Of course it is the elephant in the room that you refuse to address.
    It is none other than BIG GOVERNMENT.

    Why is it that the U.S is capable of spending over a trillion dollars per year on the Military-Industrial-Security/Surveillance state complex ?

    It is because they've managed to extract said money (for the most part) from taxpayers.

    If government is TINY, and by definition this can only happen if taxes are minimal, said government can only get up to so much mischief.

    CHINA IS THAT LOW TAXING GOVERNMENT.

    You can get ahead in China because you keep the bulk of what you earn. There is no crushing regulatory burden on businesses that prevents new entrants from taking market share from the established oligarchs. There is no regulatory burden that forces employers to employ minorities and have racial/gender/sexual preference diversity that necessarily entails that the best qualified candidate for said job is often not hired - thus reducing productivity.

    There is no excess of finite capital that supports layer upon layer of parasitic bureaucracy as there is in the U.S and other western nations.

    Spending on government as proportion of GDP in China is FAR LOWER than in the U.S.

    China is the world's leading capitalist country.

    Bottom Line: Larry, you and I are both in agreement that the present system in the U.S is a disaster and it needs to be abolished.
    But Larry, you FAIL to identify the culprit.

    Older commenters here in the UR will remember a time when a typical family lived comfortably with a single breadwinner in the household, a time when there were no tent cities comprised of the homeless, a time when countless numbers of homeless were not found sleeping under freeway overpasses etc.

    But is was GOVERNMENT that off-shored American manufacturing jobs, it was government that allowed tens of millions of undocumented migrants to cross the border, it was the government that engaged and provoked these endless foreign military misadventures, it was government that allowed the creation of the Federal Reserve and ownership of it to a private Zionist cartel.
    �
    America was once a bastion of capitalism and life was good then.
    It no longer is. Today it is a Socialist Surveillance state and hence a shit-hole in many places - and fast becoming that way in those enclaves remaining that still have some normality.

    Replies: @sonofman, @animalogic, @Levtraro, @Kratoklastes, @JR Foley, @A B Coreopsis, @Marcali, @TPM, @Showmethereal, @profnasty, @mocissepvis

    Actually – ethnic minorities in China receive far more subsidy than they do in the US. For instance you brought up Chinese spending on rail that is not profitable. Well in the heavily populated eastern region – rail is indeed profitable. The places where it is not profitable are in fact the areas where ethnic minorities live in the south (you wouldn’t know the groups) like in Yunnan and Guangxi and in the west like Xinjiang and Tibet. Also ethnic minorities are all given preference in entering universities because they are allowed to have a lower test score than the Han majority. People complain – but try e government says “we are uplifting everyone and the nation is only as strong as it’s weakest link†(paraphrase). As to taxes – mainland Chinese firms pay higher taxes than US firms (which is why many still do business through Hong Kong as it is a tax haven)… and high income Chinese pay higher federal taxes than Americans (though less than some Europeans) – which is why some try to get US residency to pay less taxes – since China currently does not tax global income like the US. But the government soon said they will do less will try to get US residency (unless they are willing to quit their source of Chinese income which is doubtful). As to regulation – that is not true either. The Wild West days of get rich by any means is over. Chinese companies have to follow strict environmental and energy and water conservation rules now. Why??? Rich Chinese left because they complained they did not want their children dying early due to pollution.

    •ï¿½Replies: @mocissepvis
    @Showmethereal


    Actually – ethnic minorities in China receive far more subsidy than they do in the US.
    �
    The Uyghurs would beg to differ with you.

    Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  • @Michael Korn
    @Anon

    https://youtu.be/ikQZDAJlHvE

    I don't know if you noticed, but around 30 minutes into this fascinating documentary it describes the pro-family pro-motherhood hard-working values that these Jewish filmmakers promoted in their early works from Hollywood. Quite different from the Hollywood of today and quite different from what all the Jew-haters on this thread say about them.

    Replies: @Truth Vigilante

    What you refer to as a ‘fascinating documentary’ is nothing but pure propaganda designed to portray these movie mogul Jews in a positive light – when in fact they were just vile and debauched degenerates.

    Check out the interview below of Shirley Temple where she tells of her experience with a Jewish movie mogul when she was a 12yr old child (watch the 1 min or so from 12:20 – 14:00):

    Video Link

    These people were scum and if you were sucked in by that obvious bit of propaganda Mevashir, it’s an indictment of your gullibility.

    •ï¿½Agree: profnasty
    •ï¿½Thanks: Arthur MacBride, Richard B
    •ï¿½Replies: @Richard B
    @Truth Vigilante

    Great video share (and comment)!

    Probably not even the full story. But good thing she shared that much. And there's Larry King laughing along with her, though no doubt with a different intent and emphasis.

    The one story, out of the many, that really gets me is what the revolting Kirk Douglas did to Natalie Wood - when she was 15! At one point even shouting You're fucking a Jew! When what he should have said was You're being raped by a Jew! But honesty has never been viewed by them as the best policy. Ever.

    In any event, his reason for raping her, or for justifying the rape, and it truly was brutal in every sense of that word, is that her grandfather fought the Bolsheviks during the revolution and Kirk, of course, was on the side of the Bolsheviks, and so that, in his warped Jewish Supremacist mind, made her an antisemite who deserved it.

    The Dark Triad is synonymous with Jewish Supremacy Inc. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_triad

    By the way, check out how the term has been modified by Wiki (now referred to as non-pathological, even though psychopathy is one of the attributes of TDT).

    The modification is recent because they know full well that TDT has been making the rounds online and is often attributed to Jewish behavior - for a reason. Since they exhibit the patterns in such an vivid and striking manner, and on such a consistent basis. To use their own repulsive jargon, it's what they do because it's who they are.

    Replies: @Truth Vigilante
  • @Justvisiting
    @RoatanBill


    That means there’s a staggering number of people that voted to continue the corrupt system everyone should know exists.
    �
    OK--so lets imagine that they know the system is corrupt.

    What exactly is the public supposed to do about it?

    Be precise.

    Replies: @RoatanBill

    Stop cooperating.

    Stop supporting the men in blue that don’t fight crime, can’t possibly fight crime and will come for your guns while telling you they’re only doing their job. Defund street cops. Demand your natural right to carry any weapon you choose to protect yourself as the constitution clearly allows without gov’t permission slips.

    Become your own street cop along with your neighbors and kill off some piece of shit that dares come at you or your property. That’s called self defense and is everyone’s natural right. Spend more on investigators and forensics people to catch more dirtbags and then execute them on their first offense. Reduce the expense for prisons guards, parole officers, etc. A few shotgun blasts and a few dead antifa would have shut down all the rioting and burning pronto.

    Get off your knees. If every gun owner showed up at the governor’s mansion, the mayor’s mansion, the prosecutor’s office, etc and told them what the news laws are that allow common sense defense, what are they going to do to stop it from happening? Assert your natural rights; it’s called real democracy.

    Man has no right to kill his brother. It is no excuse that he does so in uniform: he only adds the infamy of servitude to the crime of murder.
    Percy Bysshe Shelley

    Stop supporting the troops that are just murderers in costume that have caused the deaths of millions in just this century alone all for trumped up wars of choice. There has been no war since at least Vietnam that wasn’t offensive, making the troops the aggressors in other people’s lands. When martial law is eventually declared once the Dollar dies, they will come to your neighborhood under the guise of restoring order and follow orders to shoot you should you not want to be made a slave to an in your face dictatorship. It’s coming.

    The basic problem is quite simple. An elected representative is not tied in any substantial way to particular policies, whatever the preferences of the electorate. Influence on the politician is greatest at the time of election. Once elected, the representative is released from popular control but continues to be exposed to powerful pressure groups, especially corporations, state bureaucracies and political party power brokers.
    Brian Martin

    Stop voting.

    Instead of 68% of people voting, the regime’s legitimacy evaporates when it’s 10%. On the way to a low number, people will realize that they’re not alone in their thinking that the system is rigged and the number will sink faster. It’s cooperating in their theater that gives them the legitimacy to screw the population over every damned time.

    Is that precise enough for you?

    •ï¿½Replies: @Wade
    @RoatanBill


    Instead of 68% of people voting, the regime’s legitimacy evaporates when it’s 10%.
    �
    Really? And just how so? The regime obviously and patently cheated in the 2020 elections. It's obvious to everyone that has looked closely at the situation. But the suspicions of millions haven't slowed the regime down one iota. Yes, if only 10% of the US population voted, this would make the regime look even more illegitimate. What then? Do you think they have any residual deeply held convictions about "the consent of the governed?" No, they'd keep rolling on like nothing happened.

    I've racked my brains on this and I cannot think of how any other group of people on the planet would successfully handle things differently if they were in our shoes. It's not stupidity (as much as you'd love to characterize it that way). I know professional accountants, doctors, pharmacists, business owners, you name it, who are utterly oblivious to any and all major issues that would expose the regime for what they truly are. Maybe some of the latest occurrences are for the first time changing that a bit. But only just now.

    Replies: @RoatanBill
  • Anonymous[336] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:
    @Mac_
    @Hitmarck

    - bit of argument, real communism socialism is how we once lived. We lived in tribes hundreds of thousands of years and looked to nature and planets such as moon phases and food harvests as religion long before the cons begun their monotheism 'religions' and 'govmt' and 'money' cons. Feel free to remember Neanderthals.

    If you were going to scam people out of the last of freedom, you would take the words that once meant responsibility and with right to use force with others, then lump false 'govmt state' onto the words, and distract with false 'money' so people don't remember what real life is or where we came from.

    con 'money' and focus on filth secs or breeding made people stupid, exactly as the cons planned. Must learn to share. And kick those that are ignorant. We don't have forever to undo their schemes.

    Replies: @Mac_, @Anonymous

    Not that simple. Cause of death for hunter-gatherer men was about half homicide.

    See argument:
    https://www.rewild.com/in-depth/peace.html

    •ï¿½Replies: @RoatanBill
    @Anonymous

    How would anyone know about what the cause of death was for folks that lived before writing and cameras were invented? Any assertion of such knowledge is just guess work without evidence, aka bullshit.
  • Bro43rd says:
    July 29, 2022 at 9:33 am GMT •ï¿½100 Words
    @Blissex
    This article is based on the usual "leftoid" hallucination that only the 1% are winning and the 99% are getting poorer, but actually the political power of the 1% is supported by the top 20-40%, who have been doing very well for 40 years, mostly thanks to booming real estate prices.

    Neoliberal politics are an alliance of the property-owning upper-middle class and the upper classes against the working class, with the lower-middle class being neutral because they are not gaining but they are not losing much either.

    And indeed the real direct poison of USA politics is real estate (and share prices): as long as the upper-middle classes make fortunes thanks to the devoted efforts of the FedRes pumping up credit with which to buy it (and shares). Thanks to that huge redistribution from the lower classes, the upper-middle class have been writing a blank cheque to the neoliberal governments of the past 40 years.

    The "American Dream" is "Fuck you! I got mine" and the USA (and UK) upper-middle classes are living it, making a lot of profits on assets and nearly monopolizing the better-paid jobs, iand too bad for the 60-80% of the population they don't care about.

    The big political problem of the USA (etc.) is that rentierism is not limited to a small minority, but in a lesser way a large and powerful minority are also benefiting. Mass rentierism is a big new thing, and hallucinating that only the 1% are benefiting leads to completely wrong thinking.

    Replies: @Bro43rd

    Maybe 5% but 20-40% is ludicrous. Some of us in the top quintile worked (masonry) hard & saved to get here. And inflation is kicking our asses too. There is a rentier class and it’s the .01%. The rest of us are along for the ride & have no choice in the matter.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Blissex
    @Bro43rd

    «Maybe 5% but 20-40% is ludicrous.»

    Well, that's the percentage of voters who have been voting for bigger share and real estate prices and lower labor costs, and those who have seen their real estate prices double every 7-10 years.

    «Some of us in the top quintile worked (masonry) hard & saved to get here.»

    Howe exactly did your hard work cause a doubling of real estate (and stock) prices every 7-10 years in so many "lucky ducky" areas? In the financial jargon, that's called "passive" investment for a reason.
    And a lot of that 20-40% are retired people, who don't work at all, they just enjoy the massive amounts that asset price inflation delivers to them, entirely work-free, and usually also tax-free.

    But suppose that you earned entirely your fortune with your own work, then you would agree it would be fair for taxing 100% of capital gains on property and stocks, because those are unearned. Would you?

    Replies: @shadowy_figure
  • Anonymous[336] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:
    July 29, 2022 at 9:23 am GMT •ï¿½500 Words
    @shadowy_figure
    @Anonymous

    I'll try to address the issue you raise from a Buddhist perspective.

    The simplest way to deal with your theological Gordion knot is to simply cut through it with a sword. There is no God, and there is no problem of evil. Good and evil will always exist. Even if good ultimately achieves some kind of total victory, that would correspond with the final liberation of all sentient beings and they would cease to exist and time would have no meaning for them, as with good and evil.

    It's my understanding that the Hindus believe that this will actually happen, but they posit that the universe is one of many existing in a logical chain. The final events of this universe seed the events of the next even though no sentient being will survive into the "next" one. From that point of view, the "future" universe has to be seen as an entirely separate creation. I'm not saying that this is the truth but it intrigues me.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    I’ll try to address the issue you raise from a Buddhist perspective.

    The simplest way to deal with your theological Gordion knot is to simply cut through it with a sword. There is no God, and there is no problem of evil. Good and evil will always exist.

    Hume more or less destroyed that argument with his simple request to tell why the Sun will rise next morning.

    Different religions answer that in different ways. The answer boils down to “God wills it”, and persistence of God’s will varies between religions.

    In Christianity, God set up the rules of physics as part of God’s Word, which is inalterable once given. Example: even repeated Jewish abominations did not lead God to abandon His word that they were a “chosen people”, God simply had to choose yet another people, since the original Word hadn’t been “one and only chosen people”.

    In Islam, Allah has absolute freedom, a consequence of absolute power. “If Allah willed it, we would all have to turn pagan tomorrow” is a legitimate statement in Islam.

    In the faith you describe, there is not reason for the sun to come up tomorrow, or for the universe to exist. All you really know is that you think, therefore you are [1] — right now.

    This has consequences. The Christians can develop science, systematized knowledge, knowing that it won’t become obsolete tomorrow or next week. Even Newtons’ laws, criticized as “not applicable for the rest of the Universe” are valid and will remain so for most engineering work here on Earth, and has been integrated into a general theory rather than rejected. Under most religions, there is no such guarantee, and either excessive narcissisms or preoccupation with politics are the preoccupations. This has led to a rather unpleasant life for most people, which rather emphasizes that pain is a problem than solving the “problem of pain”.

    As Hume pointed out, philosophers who say they are skeptics ordinarily use doorways to enter or leave rooms, rather than trying to walk through a wall that “isn’t really there”. By the same token, Buddhists may say “there is no God”, but act as the skeptics do. They may say that “some things change, some don’t”, but have no intellectual way of telling which is which.

    So what difference does it make? The world situation suggests that the “problem of pain” is about to become acute, in large part because too many people are acting as “non-contributing consumers”. The Protestant idea of “vocation” and the “American dream” of pursuing productive work is likely the only answer to this problem, as is apparent by the flow of people to areas where these two ideas hold sway.

  • @Ghan-buri-Ghan
    The time for China to stand and fight is now.

    China has long been the world's leader in productivity. Market size is the biggest in the world. Comprehensive scientific and technological strength is also world class.

    However, the standard of living per capita is still not as good as most Western countries. Why? Because the current world rules were designed to exploit and enslave China. Why should the Chinese work so hard to create all kinds of wealth for the Western masters to enjoy? To help them maintain a high standard of living with low costs, yet be disparaged and attacked every day?

    The reason for the current situation is due to a lack of opportunity for China to change it. Now is the time. Simply take advantage of Pelosi's trip to Taiwan province. Strike and be done with it. Russia has already started the real fight anyway.

    And regardless, the world economy is now so poor, there is nothing to maintain. Fighting instead can stimulate the economy, just like with Russia.

    Jews and Anglos are afraid of power, not virtue. If China backs down, the West will continue escalating and crossing red lines. Time to fight. The old demon lady's visit is the perfect pretext.

    Replies: @Anon, @Munga Bulga

    >Jews and Anglos are afraid of power, not virtue+

    THIS!

    These Sub-Human vermin only understand violence. One simply doesn’t reason with parasites.

  • @Robert Dolan
    @Mario Partisan

    I believe it's in the book, "An Empire Of Their Own," that the jewish author openly admits that organized jewry deliberately screwed the American people by changing the vision of the country from that of a high trust, hard working, God fearing nation....into a slimy meth infested crew of monkeypox buttfuckers and trannies looking for kids to groom.

    Keep in mind that this effort took many years of sleepless nights for the relentless small hats and trillions of dollars in bribes as well as Epstein honeypots entrapping leaders with 12 year olds.

    Got to hand it to the small hats though.....that's truly an exquisite amount of jewing.

    Replies: @thotmonger, @Anon

    I suppose a show or two in Spain has satisfied the modern viewer about the history of Queen Isabella. Ho ho. But has there ever been a film about her attempted in Hollywood? When they get around to it, they will probably characterize her like they did Charles Lindbergh in Plot Against America. Defamation par excellence.

    Video Link


    Video Link

  • My comment didn’t emphasize it, until the end, but yes, the same vast resources that made America a land of opportunity for ambitious European peasants, made it the ideal place from which to establish a global Jewish empire.

    The first condition was the vastness of the land and its resources. The second condition was its virginity – namely that there was not yet an established culture, but simply a hodge podge of immigrant groups, and therefore no common culture that could stand united opposed to Jewish hegemony.

    For this reason, the “American Dream” is, ultimately, unique for only one group – the Jews. As Romanoff says, most Americans who became affluent in America could have done the same in Europe. The only group that truly needed America to get where they got was the Jews – the well-developed Gentile cultural identifies in Europe made Jewish inflitration and nepotism very difficult, but in the Tower of Babel that was America it became easy. Combine that easiness with America’s resources and you have the basis for a Jewish global empire.

    In case folks have not noticed, Jews study every nation in search of its particular vulnerabilities. They found them in Russia and thus were able to overthrow the Romanov dynasty and establish the USSR. The ideology of the Soviet State was that it was a state the represented the interests of the Russian working class and this was promoted as reality in spite of all opposing facts on the ground.

    “The American Dream” is the American analog to Russian Communism – the same group monopolizing control of the Commanding Heights of the economy through a false ideology – the Jewish-American version shrouding their control with the language of “free enterprise” as opposed to the language of working class solidarity, but the end result has been the same – an economy controlled by Jewish supremacists.

    It seems, at the end of the day, that a pseudo-capitalist ideology has been more effective for the Jews than Communism, as the latter ultimately undermines the social position of the false elite that espouses it. Elite American Capitalist Jews have no need for an elaborate ideology to justify their status – they can just say “we won the rat race and so deserve to rule.”

    The “America Dream” is an ideology the serves Jewish power far more effectively than any the Levites have yet decided.

  • TimMcGraw says:
    July 29, 2022 at 5:01 am GMT •ï¿½500 Words

    So much has and continues to be written about the failed American “experiment.” I love the Unz site; it provides a formidable juxtaposition to the drivel that trickles out of western civilization, and makes me think. The quibbles I have with the content, are that it is, one, heavy on the Antisemitism, a form of which I don’t care for. Opportunistic. Like the excesses of banks, dominated by Jews, is representative of Jews as a whole. When excesses become apparent, it’s easy to throw stones, But I don’t buy it. And worse, two, it lumps the entire American population into a nice convenient box of abused coal miners or cotton pickers or service workers, unaware of how much they are abused and mistreated by the corrupt American system of government. A bunch of rubes. I don’t buy that, either.

    I live in a heavily blue state, Illinois. Good schools, high level of college graduates, and more. And even here, people can easily, in casual conversation, make a distinction between the corrupted creeps that walk the halls of the plaster, rather than marble, walls of the Illinois capital building (as in cheap facade) and serious politicians who want to improve the lives of the people in society.

    There is a wide wide chasm between the locals who really want a better society, and Washington ideals. And an even wider chasm on how to get there. Obama’s “fundamental change” was absolute bullshit to well over 150m Americans, and the voting segment refuted the agenda in 2016. Whether it won or had victory torn away, is one thing. But the 150 didn’t vote for the nonsense manifest in the article, and the point I want to make is the 150m, I think more, would be just fine with trimming the government by maybe 75%, hanging all or most of the pols who oversaw Covid and 2008 financial collapse and FBI school shootings, and all the rest. And start over.

    But here’s the tricky part, and where the author is confused. The American experiment started with a Declaration, following a long train of abuses. Only then, after numerous attempts to seek redress, did the population rise up and take care of business. Then, America became a country. Currently, our problems are not a failure of the idea: it’s a failure of will. And a reluctance to risk the destruction of a system that would work, and quite well, thank you very much, without all the corruption. And I’m almost ashamed to say, it’s our fault, for reelecting the same non-serious flawed people over and over. But please don’t bury America. It’s not going away. After all, Russia survived how many years of Tyranny?

    America, it once was the “Land of the Free, Home of the Brave.” And will be again. But, and it’s a big but, there has to be a new government, with new, fresh ideas, waiting in the wings, organized under a Constitution. All we need to do is identify the “Brave.” They are out there. And if things get any worse, the world will hear from them.

    •ï¿½Replies: @RoatanBill
    @TimMcGraw

    You were doing fine until your last paragraph where you want to again get on your knees to gov't. Are you so inept that you can't control the things you're responsible for? Do you think your neighbors are so inept to deal with their things that some "other" is needed? Why is it that you want another group of criminals to write the rules you are forced to live by due to men in blue acting as thugs?

    Gov't is illegitimate. Here's the proof.

    If your neighbor can't demand money from you for what it is he wants to accomplish and if the entire neighborhood can't demand money from you for what they want to accomplish, at what specific number of individuals does it become the right of that mob to demand money from you? Gov't is the mob. Gov't is an extortion ring, mafia.

    If your neighbor can't write some stuff on a piece of paper and demand you obey and your entire neighborhood can't write their demand on a piece of paper and demand you obey, at what specific number of individuals does that mob legitimately have the right to tell you how to live your life?

    No one can give away authority they don't have to begin with. Authority doesn't spontaneously appear when 10, 100, 1000 or a million people without a specific authority get together. That they claim that authority magically appears from nowhere is the entire concept of gov't, and it is a fraud.

    Replies: @Brian Damage
    , @Eric Novak
    @TimMcGraw

    Russia survived because it’s dominated by a single ethnic group. America will not survive in its current demographic form. This is an inevitable, undeniable fact as hard as an ice pick in the eye, no matter how pathetic the denial.
  • @anonymous
    Tho it wouldn't be generally possible for huge numbers to emulate in the USA, one nonetheless has many, many stories of immigrants recently arriving in America with little or no resources, who yet achieve success as millionaire mini-capitalists over the space of a few years, principally from amongst various groups of Asians. Components of their success include:
    - Hugely long-hours and hard work others won't do
    - Pooling resources with relatives or co-ethnic immigrants to enable capitalist acquisition of assets, in both business-owning and real estate
    - Living for a time in crowded, group-home, bunk-bed circumstances whites wouldn't tolerate, whilst assets are gathered
    - A certain ruthlessness regarding, and focus upon, what makes money, most all else pushed to the side
    - Utter willingness to exploit identifiable opportunities such as government contracts, affirmative action etc
    - Knowing how to confuse and evade authorities ('My English no good!') when questions are asked about dodgy conduct

    From the point of view of these 'millionaire from nothing within 10 years' immigrants, the white-heritage Americans 'just don't have the drive' to do what they do. Whites are overall inclined to less-demanding life patterns, their usual 'best' is just entering a profession where upper-middle class incomes are frequent, such as health care, or, to a lesser extent, lawyers (i.e., many of the USA's 1-million-plus lawyers are surplus, and do not have a high-income future)

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Justvisiting, @James Scott, @profnasty, @mocissepvis, @Eric Novak

    You left out cheating. Asian immigrants cheat on their taxes big time. Also mestizo immigrants are now allowed to run illegal food businesses in Southern California. If one has a fold up table an easy up and and ice chest they have a roadside fruit stand no permits needed. If you call the city clerks office to complain mestizo’s who staff all our gov’t offices in CA will call you a racist for reporting them.

    White people are not allowed to sell anything on the street let alone food products that can make people sick.

  • @Mario Partisan
    I agree with the author's perspective - the Ideology of America is a fraud designed to keep those abused by the system identifying with its abusive structures. "The American Dream" is gas-lighting extraodinaire.

    But let's dig a little deeper. First, "The Dream" ideology is, despite its falsehood in the modern era, based on something long gone, but genuine - namely the opportunities that this virgin land offered at the time that the USA was founded as a state.

    In the 17 to early 1800s, America offered genuine opportunities that were unavailable to many in the British imperial center. Those who would have had no prospect of owning land in England could come to the colonies and work virgin soil, become a petty bourgeois, accumulate savings and put their progeny on a path that the aristocratically monopolized Britain made impossible. It was this primordial environment that became the root of the false "American Dream" ideology.

    But of course, the unique material conditions of America at its origins could not last. Eventually the virgin soil becomes occupied, the same monopolistic, financial-aristocratic tendencies of the old world take root and America became just a bigger version of the oppressive "Old Country". (Being so large in area as America is, these oppressive conditions were for many years attenuated in comparison to the situation in England, but developed nevertheless.)

    The difference with the Old World is that there *was* an epoch of colonial freedom that stayed in the collective memory of the people and become the basis for the continuation of "The Dream" ideology, long passed its correspondence with material reality.

    It is a tenant of Marxism that ideas lag behind material conditions - people continue to view today's world through the lense of a real, but lost past.

    In short, the relatively free origins of America's existence have become the basis of the false "American Dream" ideology of today.

    Even after the original conditions supporting the ideology were gone, historical "abnormalities" allowed for its perpetuation. The destruction of Europe and Japan following the world wars allowed America to develope into an unchallenged industrial and financial super power; that status then allowed America to maintain the illusion of prosperity even after the era of de-industrialization by living off the tribute, payed in goods and services, of developing nations. And so it was in this way that the "American Dream" continued to have a material reality for the citizenry. But in truth, the ideology was already living off the mortgaging of its original validity.

    Everything in America is, at this point, a facade - even the produce in it supermarkets, as Romanoff described in a recent article.

    For quite some time, the "American Dream" has been nothing but a "Zionist Dream" - America is a land in which Jewish parasitism has found its most satisfying host. "The American Dream" is now little more than the projection of its abusers' success onto their victims.

    But now the host is dead and dry, and yet the parasite is incapable of doing anything but doubling down on the parasitism of the dead host.

    Therein lies the material basis of today's Clown World.

    Replies: @Robert Dolan, @Doctor, My Eyes

    I believe it’s in the book, “An Empire Of Their Own,” that the jewish author openly admits that organized jewry deliberately screwed the American people by changing the vision of the country from that of a high trust, hard working, God fearing nation….into a slimy meth infested crew of monkeypox buttfuckers and trannies looking for kids to groom.

    Keep in mind that this effort took many years of sleepless nights for the relentless small hats and trillions of dollars in bribes as well as Epstein honeypots entrapping leaders with 12 year olds.

    Got to hand it to the small hats though…..that’s truly an exquisite amount of jewing.

    •ï¿½Replies: @thotmonger
    @Robert Dolan

    I suppose a show or two in Spain has satisfied the modern viewer about the history of Queen Isabella. Ho ho. But has there ever been a film about her attempted in Hollywood? When they get around to it, they will probably characterize her like they did Charles Lindbergh in Plot Against America. Defamation par excellence.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W4cEc9uasrg

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFs5kbx8qT8
    , @Anon
    @Robert Dolan

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJifkSyrU24

    Take a look at 36:00 where the Jewish studio head refers to his wife as "she/her" in an interview. Never once calling her by name or "my wife." Just a trophy for goycceptance.

    Warner's daughter admits on camera (53:00) that he never once told her about his Jewish heritage religion or beliefs. All concealed from his progeny. The same was true for my parents. They were desperate to blend in even as they demanded obeisance to Jewish ideals.

    Replies: @Michael Korn
  • @Anonymous
    @Richard B

    Nonsense. It's just and necessary to hold people accountable for their behavior. Even when boomers whine and squirm and gaslight that the one subjecting them to scrutiny is somehow inadequate. Logically, to hear boomers, you could never criticize anyone because doing so is only a symptom of personal inadequacy. Of course this only applies when they're the ones being criticized.

    But the boomer horseshit isn't working anymore. The worst generation in human history will definitely get their comeuppance.

    Replies: @Robert Dolan

    Nah…..found the jew.

    Boomer bashing is a diversion to spew blame on innocent old people when the real blame should fall on the jews who did the dirty work and subversion.

    The tactic is obvious and transparent….and it doesn’t work anymore.

    It’s comparable to the R word…..nobody cares anymore.

  • @RoatanBill
    @Wade

    But why am I sensing such a strong animosity directed towards the US public rather than where it mostly deserves to be: on US leadership and media?

    The Internet has been around for quite some time now so information of all kinds is readily available. The last presidential election had 66.8% of people 18 years and older that voted. That means there's a staggering number of people that voted to continue the corrupt system everyone should know exists.

    Why wouldn't someone conclude that there's something seriously wrong with the US population? Why shouldn't someone blame them for what the gov't does in their name decade after decade? The Fed Gov is a criminal enterprise, invading country after country, sanctioning the world and the US population votes to continue this practice time and time again.

    Replies: @Justvisiting

    That means there’s a staggering number of people that voted to continue the corrupt system everyone should know exists.

    OK–so lets imagine that they know the system is corrupt.

    What exactly is the public supposed to do about it?

    Be precise.

    •ï¿½Replies: @RoatanBill
    @Justvisiting

    Stop cooperating.

    Stop supporting the men in blue that don't fight crime, can't possibly fight crime and will come for your guns while telling you they're only doing their job. Defund street cops. Demand your natural right to carry any weapon you choose to protect yourself as the constitution clearly allows without gov't permission slips.

    Become your own street cop along with your neighbors and kill off some piece of shit that dares come at you or your property. That's called self defense and is everyone's natural right. Spend more on investigators and forensics people to catch more dirtbags and then execute them on their first offense. Reduce the expense for prisons guards, parole officers, etc. A few shotgun blasts and a few dead antifa would have shut down all the rioting and burning pronto.

    Get off your knees. If every gun owner showed up at the governor's mansion, the mayor's mansion, the prosecutor's office, etc and told them what the news laws are that allow common sense defense, what are they going to do to stop it from happening? Assert your natural rights; it's called real democracy.

    Man has no right to kill his brother. It is no excuse that he does so in uniform: he only adds the infamy of servitude to the crime of murder.
    Percy Bysshe Shelley


    Stop supporting the troops that are just murderers in costume that have caused the deaths of millions in just this century alone all for trumped up wars of choice. There has been no war since at least Vietnam that wasn't offensive, making the troops the aggressors in other people's lands. When martial law is eventually declared once the Dollar dies, they will come to your neighborhood under the guise of restoring order and follow orders to shoot you should you not want to be made a slave to an in your face dictatorship. It's coming.

    The basic problem is quite simple. An elected representative is not tied in any substantial way to particular policies, whatever the preferences of the electorate. Influence on the politician is greatest at the time of election. Once elected, the representative is released from popular control but continues to be exposed to powerful pressure groups, especially corporations, state bureaucracies and political party power brokers.
    Brian Martin


    Stop voting.

    Instead of 68% of people voting, the regime's legitimacy evaporates when it's 10%. On the way to a low number, people will realize that they're not alone in their thinking that the system is rigged and the number will sink faster. It's cooperating in their theater that gives them the legitimacy to screw the population over every damned time.

    Is that precise enough for you?

    Replies: @Wade
  • @Godfree Roberts
    Sans parole...

    https://i.imgur.com/1bQ28md.png

    Replies: @Doug Ryler, @thotmonger

    I was not expecting this essay to become a puff piece for China. But that is the rabbit Romanov pulls out of the hat for Han. Tadah! Ha.

    And with Godfree’s reply appearing as number one, it reminds me how Ehud Barak conveniently appeared on BBC hours after the 9/11/2001 attacks to tell the world that Osama Bin Laden was likely the master mind. Ha. What is that called? Something like the primacy — or control — of the message.

    Before you cry too much USA is not more like China, here is another view on the situation there.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Zumbuddi
    @thotmonger

    Five years ago David Goldman ("Spengler") informed an audience at Westminster Institute about the Chinese total surveillance system:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=itAVYCiJ43g

    And a few years before that, in 2014, James Corbett offered evidence that the Chinese, the Russians, and the American (((and other))) financial cohort are working together, not in competition.

    https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-297-china-and-the-new-world-order/

    So Goldman's presentation at Westminster was not so much a warning but a snapshot of Things to Come.

    Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  • @Anonymous
    @James J. O'Meara


    The Law (aka the law of attraction) was meant only to make our lives a little more comfortable, but also to give us convincing proof (through its successful use) of the existence of God. And then, as one becomes bored with comfort and acquisitions (see Schopenhauer), can one successfully turn away from them towards union with God (which he called The Promise).
    �
    That is a highly American thought. If you think that God loves his creation, then you have to consider the Problem of Pain. One solution is that God has presented a way to live in His physical creation, one that works as describe in the Blockquote above, and is embodied in the Protestant idea of vocation.

    Note that this differs from the Jewish idea of relations with God. The Jewish idea is embodied with the story of Jacob who wrestled with a angel or maybe God, hard for a human to say, then changed his name to Israel, "Fights with God and Wins" ( Genesis 32:28). Ever since then Judaism has been about fighting with God (and everybody else) and winning. That's not he same as following God's commandments so as to find your place in reality and realize God's place in reality (i.e. as its Creator and Master).

    One could make similar analyses of Islam, Buddhism, Shinto, Hinduism, and so on, each of which has a different relation between God (or gods) and man.

    Communist would amount to following the Party's commandments so as to find your place in reality and realize that reality is independent of God (if such a being exists) and realize the humans in the Party's place in reality (i.e. as its Creator and master). In contemporary jargon: "Everything important is a social construct, subject to reconstruction at the Woke Party's command.

    Replies: @shadowy_figure

    I’ll try to address the issue you raise from a Buddhist perspective.

    The simplest way to deal with your theological Gordion knot is to simply cut through it with a sword. There is no God, and there is no problem of evil. Good and evil will always exist. Even if good ultimately achieves some kind of total victory, that would correspond with the final liberation of all sentient beings and they would cease to exist and time would have no meaning for them, as with good and evil.

    It’s my understanding that the Hindus believe that this will actually happen, but they posit that the universe is one of many existing in a logical chain. The final events of this universe seed the events of the next even though no sentient being will survive into the “next” one. From that point of view, the “future” universe has to be seen as an entirely separate creation. I’m not saying that this is the truth but it intrigues me.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Anonymous
    @shadowy_figure


    I’ll try to address the issue you raise from a Buddhist perspective.

    The simplest way to deal with your theological Gordion knot is to simply cut through it with a sword. There is no God, and there is no problem of evil. Good and evil will always exist.
    �
    Hume more or less destroyed that argument with his simple request to tell why the Sun will rise next morning.

    Different religions answer that in different ways. The answer boils down to "God wills it", and persistence of God's will varies between religions.

    In Christianity, God set up the rules of physics as part of God's Word, which is inalterable once given. Example: even repeated Jewish abominations did not lead God to abandon His word that they were a "chosen people", God simply had to choose yet another people, since the original Word hadn't been "one and only chosen people".

    In Islam, Allah has absolute freedom, a consequence of absolute power. "If Allah willed it, we would all have to turn pagan tomorrow" is a legitimate statement in Islam.

    In the faith you describe, there is not reason for the sun to come up tomorrow, or for the universe to exist. All you really know is that you think, therefore you are [1] -- right now.

    This has consequences. The Christians can develop science, systematized knowledge, knowing that it won't become obsolete tomorrow or next week. Even Newtons' laws, criticized as "not applicable for the rest of the Universe" are valid and will remain so for most engineering work here on Earth, and has been integrated into a general theory rather than rejected. Under most religions, there is no such guarantee, and either excessive narcissisms or preoccupation with politics are the preoccupations. This has led to a rather unpleasant life for most people, which rather emphasizes that pain is a problem than solving the "problem of pain".

    As Hume pointed out, philosophers who say they are skeptics ordinarily use doorways to enter or leave rooms, rather than trying to walk through a wall that "isn't really there". By the same token, Buddhists may say "there is no God", but act as the skeptics do. They may say that "some things change, some don't", but have no intellectual way of telling which is which.

    So what difference does it make? The world situation suggests that the "problem of pain" is about to become acute, in large part because too many people are acting as "non-contributing consumers". The Protestant idea of "vocation" and the "American dream" of pursuing productive work is likely the only answer to this problem, as is apparent by the flow of people to areas where these two ideas hold sway.
  • I agree with the author’s perspective – the Ideology of America is a fraud designed to keep those abused by the system identifying with its abusive structures. “The American Dream” is gas-lighting extraodinaire.

    But let’s dig a little deeper. First, “The Dream” ideology is, despite its falsehood in the modern era, based on something long gone, but genuine – namely the opportunities that this virgin land offered at the time that the USA was founded as a state.

    In the 17 to early 1800s, America offered genuine opportunities that were unavailable to many in the British imperial center. Those who would have had no prospect of owning land in England could come to the colonies and work virgin soil, become a petty bourgeois, accumulate savings and put their progeny on a path that the aristocratically monopolized Britain made impossible. It was this primordial environment that became the root of the false “American Dream” ideology.

    But of course, the unique material conditions of America at its origins could not last. Eventually the virgin soil becomes occupied, the same monopolistic, financial-aristocratic tendencies of the old world take root and America became just a bigger version of the oppressive “Old Country”. (Being so large in area as America is, these oppressive conditions were for many years attenuated in comparison to the situation in England, but developed nevertheless.)

    The difference with the Old World is that there *was* an epoch of colonial freedom that stayed in the collective memory of the people and become the basis for the continuation of “The Dream” ideology, long passed its correspondence with material reality.

    It is a tenant of Marxism that ideas lag behind material conditions – people continue to view today’s world through the lense of a real, but lost past.

    In short, the relatively free origins of America’s existence have become the basis of the false “American Dream” ideology of today.

    Even after the original conditions supporting the ideology were gone, historical “abnormalities” allowed for its perpetuation. The destruction of Europe and Japan following the world wars allowed America to develope into an unchallenged industrial and financial super power; that status then allowed America to maintain the illusion of prosperity even after the era of de-industrialization by living off the tribute, payed in goods and services, of developing nations. And so it was in this way that the “American Dream” continued to have a material reality for the citizenry. But in truth, the ideology was already living off the mortgaging of its original validity.

    Everything in America is, at this point, a facade – even the produce in it supermarkets, as Romanoff described in a recent article.

    For quite some time, the “American Dream” has been nothing but a “Zionist Dream” – America is a land in which Jewish parasitism has found its most satisfying host. “The American Dream” is now little more than the projection of its abusers’ success onto their victims.

    But now the host is dead and dry, and yet the parasite is incapable of doing anything but doubling down on the parasitism of the dead host.

    Therein lies the material basis of today’s Clown World.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Robert Dolan
    @Mario Partisan

    I believe it's in the book, "An Empire Of Their Own," that the jewish author openly admits that organized jewry deliberately screwed the American people by changing the vision of the country from that of a high trust, hard working, God fearing nation....into a slimy meth infested crew of monkeypox buttfuckers and trannies looking for kids to groom.

    Keep in mind that this effort took many years of sleepless nights for the relentless small hats and trillions of dollars in bribes as well as Epstein honeypots entrapping leaders with 12 year olds.

    Got to hand it to the small hats though.....that's truly an exquisite amount of jewing.

    Replies: @thotmonger, @Anon
    , @Doctor, My Eyes
    @Mario Partisan

    Nice assist but it's still just propaganda.
  • Mac_ [AKA "Cris M."] says:
    @Mac_
    @Hitmarck

    - bit of argument, real communism socialism is how we once lived. We lived in tribes hundreds of thousands of years and looked to nature and planets such as moon phases and food harvests as religion long before the cons begun their monotheism 'religions' and 'govmt' and 'money' cons. Feel free to remember Neanderthals.

    If you were going to scam people out of the last of freedom, you would take the words that once meant responsibility and with right to use force with others, then lump false 'govmt state' onto the words, and distract with false 'money' so people don't remember what real life is or where we came from.

    con 'money' and focus on filth secs or breeding made people stupid, exactly as the cons planned. Must learn to share. And kick those that are ignorant. We don't have forever to undo their schemes.

    Replies: @Mac_, @Anonymous

    – must learn to share – energy. And whatever else it takes.

  • Mac_ [AKA "Cris M."] says:
    July 29, 2022 at 2:06 am GMT •ï¿½200 Words
    @Hitmarck
    @Truth Vigilante

    real â„¢ capitalism has never been tried
    real â„¢ communism has never been tried
    real â„¢ fascism worked so good, we had to pincer it out of existence

    Replies: @Mac_, @Alrenous

    – bit of argument, real communism socialism is how we once lived. We lived in tribes hundreds of thousands of years and looked to nature and planets such as moon phases and food harvests as religion long before the cons begun their monotheism ‘religions’ and ‘govmt’ and ‘money’ cons. Feel free to remember Neanderthals.

    If you were going to scam people out of the last of freedom, you would take the words that once meant responsibility and with right to use force with others, then lump false ‘govmt state’ onto the words, and distract with false ‘money’ so people don’t remember what real life is or where we came from.

    con ‘money’ and focus on filth secs or breeding made people stupid, exactly as the cons planned. Must learn to share. And kick those that are ignorant. We don’t have forever to undo their schemes.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Mac_
    @Mac_

    - must learn to share - energy. And whatever else it takes.
    , @Anonymous
    @Mac_

    Not that simple. Cause of death for hunter-gatherer men was about half homicide.

    See argument:
    https://www.rewild.com/in-depth/peace.html

    Replies: @RoatanBill
  • Anonymous[321] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:
    July 29, 2022 at 2:04 am GMT •ï¿½300 Words
    @James J. O'Meara
    @Anonymous


    2) The “American Dream†is an invention of the media. It originally meant the Protestant’s idea of “vocationâ€: supporting yourself by doing something that helped the commonality. It was changed by Marxist media into “making lots of money by exploiting others (and more recently, “by destroying the planetâ€.
    �
    Neville, the greatest of the New Thought lecturers, emphasized that The Law (aka the law of attraction) was meant only to make our lives a little more comfortable, but also to give us convincing proof (through its successful use) of the existence of God. And then, as one becomes bored with comfort and acquisitions (see Schopenhauer), can one successfully turn away from them towards union with God (which he called The Promise). The Amish do something similar with their "wild years" or whatever they call it. Oscar Wilde: "The best way to overcome temptation is to yield to it."

    For more on Neville, see my Mysticism After Modernism: Crowley, Evola, Neville, Watts, Colin Wilson, and Other Populist Gurus (Melbourne, Australia: Manticore Press, 2020).

    Replies: @Alrenous, @Anonymous

    The Law (aka the law of attraction) was meant only to make our lives a little more comfortable, but also to give us convincing proof (through its successful use) of the existence of God. And then, as one becomes bored with comfort and acquisitions (see Schopenhauer), can one successfully turn away from them towards union with God (which he called The Promise).

    That is a highly American thought. If you think that God loves his creation, then you have to consider the Problem of Pain. One solution is that God has presented a way to live in His physical creation, one that works as describe in the Blockquote above, and is embodied in the Protestant idea of vocation.

    Note that this differs from the Jewish idea of relations with God. The Jewish idea is embodied with the story of Jacob who wrestled with a angel or maybe God, hard for a human to say, then changed his name to Israel, “Fights with God and Wins” ( Genesis 32:28). Ever since then Judaism has been about fighting with God (and everybody else) and winning. That’s not he same as following God’s commandments so as to find your place in reality and realize God’s place in reality (i.e. as its Creator and Master).

    One could make similar analyses of Islam, Buddhism, Shinto, Hinduism, and so on, each of which has a different relation between God (or gods) and man.

    Communist would amount to following the Party’s commandments so as to find your place in reality and realize that reality is independent of God (if such a being exists) and realize the humans in the Party’s place in reality (i.e. as its Creator and master). In contemporary jargon: “Everything important is a social construct, subject to reconstruction at the Woke Party’s command.

    •ï¿½Replies: @shadowy_figure
    @Anonymous

    I'll try to address the issue you raise from a Buddhist perspective.

    The simplest way to deal with your theological Gordion knot is to simply cut through it with a sword. There is no God, and there is no problem of evil. Good and evil will always exist. Even if good ultimately achieves some kind of total victory, that would correspond with the final liberation of all sentient beings and they would cease to exist and time would have no meaning for them, as with good and evil.

    It's my understanding that the Hindus believe that this will actually happen, but they posit that the universe is one of many existing in a logical chain. The final events of this universe seed the events of the next even though no sentient being will survive into the "next" one. From that point of view, the "future" universe has to be seen as an entirely separate creation. I'm not saying that this is the truth but it intrigues me.

    Replies: @Anonymous
  • @Truth Vigilante
    @animalogic

    You wrote:


    OK, you’ve set up a straw man argument.
    Why should both philosophies be “equalâ€
    �
    I have mentioned in numerous other threads in the UR that China's economy is OVERWHELMINGLY Capitalist.

    However, others have come back with nonsense like: 'It's a "mixed economy" or some such - implying that it's equal measures of both.
    And, judging from the context of what Larry Romanoff wrote (and what he's said in the past), I believe Larry too thinks it's both socialist and capitalist in more or less equal measure.

    You also write:

    You talk of low taxes — taxes for the 1% (10% ?) have steadily decreased since at least Reagan.
    �
    One has to distinguish between 'Tax Rates' and 'Actual Tax paid'.

    I've heard arguments from rabid left wingers saying things like: 'OK, we acknowledge that life was good in the U.S during the Eisenhower years - but that's because the top marginal tax rate was something like 90 %'.

    Fun Fact # 1: NO ONE paid 90% of their income in tax during the 1950's.
    At that time there was an ENDLESS LIST of tax deductions that you could claim, many of which were for the most frivolous things that we'd never imagine were allowable and people used the tax code to make deductions that enabled them to accumulate assets and wealth and pay very little tax.

    Moreover, state and local taxes were much lower as well.
    All things combined meant that the ACTUAL TAX paid as a proportion of income was FAR LOWER than in the present.

    And that makes sense. After all, GOVERNMENT at Federal, State and Local levels was MUCH SMALLER so far less in taxes was needed as there weren't layer upon layer of parasitic bureaucracy to pay the wages of.

    Most importantly, the U.S was on a Gold Standard and governments were forced to be fiscally far more conservative and there was precious little of the ENDLESS MONEY PRINTING that exists today.

    Are you aware how the Federal Government taxes you today without increasing tax rates, without actually making you pay more tax in nominal terms ?
    I bet you have no idea.

    Picture this: A government, at some point in the future, wants to waste more money on subsidising some Green energy boondoggle, increase spending to the Military-Industrial-Security-Surveillance-Complex or just dole out more welfare largesse etc.
    But simultaneously it does not want to increase taxes to pay for it as this would be electorally unpopular and it might lose the next election.

    What it does is just engage in MMT (Modern Monetary Theory) and run a colossal budget deficit and just get the Federal Reserve to PRINT THE MONEY IT NEEDS INTO EXISTENCE to make up the shortfall*.
    (*The Fed doesn't directly give the money to the U.S government. Instead, the U.S treasury issues bonds which it sells to the Fed and said proceeds from bond sales pay for the budget shortfall.
    Really, it's a distinction without a difference as it effectively means the U.S government can get the Fed to fund a budget shortfall of any magnitude).


    So what we get is a LOT OF EXTRA MONEY circulating chasing a fixed quantity of output.

    END RESULT: Chronic inflation.

    This is what the brilliant economic forecaster Peter Schiff calls the INFLATION TAX.

    It's a an easy fix way for politicians to promise all things to all constituencies and still be able to fund it.

    But it is has dire long term consequences.

    Bottom Line: Every dollar you print/digitally create into existence reduces the PURCHASING POWER of those dollars already in existence.
    This is what I meant by 'Inflation Tax'. Your savings and holdings of dollars have LOST VALUE and this lost value has been transferred BY STEALTH to the government.

    And the U.S has 'printed' countless trillions in these last two years and this will result in an INFLATIONARY DEPRESSION the likes of which the record books have never seen - concurrent with loss of reserve currency status that will ensure that the U.S will sink into the banana republic abyss.
    �

    Replies: @Curmudgeon, @shadowy_figure

    You are right, but it’s even worse than a stealth tax. The government doesn’t just help itself. It helps the financial sector too. Recent inflation has partially manifested in stock market gains. I myself may be a beneficiary of this, but I still think it’s depravity.

  • Anonymous[259] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:
    July 29, 2022 at 2:00 am GMT •ï¿½100 Words

    https://www.vox.com/2017/12/20/16772670/baby-boomers-millennials-congress-debt

    “…The boomers inherited a rich, dynamic country and have gradually bankrupted it. They habitually cut their own taxes and borrow money without any concern for future burdens. They’ve spent virtually all our money and assets on themselves and in the process have left a financial disaster for their children.

    We used to have the finest infrastructure in the world. The American Society of Civil Engineers thinks there’s something like a $4 trillion deficit in infrastructure in deferred maintenance. It’s crumbling, and the boomers have allowed it to crumble. Our public education system has steadily degraded as well, forcing middle-class students to bury themselves in debt in order to get a college education…”

  • ‘they call it the american dream because you have to be asleep to believe it.’ george carlin, sage.

  • @WorkingClass
    I was born in '44, a white working class man. The American dream was a modest home of your own with a white picket fence. A wife and three kids and a dog. Food in the frige and gas in the tank. All on working class wages and a 40 hour week with the promice of a pension for your old age. That America is gone along with it's dream.

    Or maybe the dream just went to China along with American Industry.

    Replies: @Diversity Heretic, @animalogic, @The Real World, @Alrenous, @Showmethereal, @Not Important, @TheMoon, @William Williams

    It was all supposed to be preserved for Posterity, but too many people thought Posterity was a new diet or flavor of Hot Pocket.

  • The problem with america is NOT big government. It’s diversity. Adopt MAWA and america will be supreme again.

  • @repsinec
    The "American Dream" is going nowhere - yet. US Americans earn on average $65,000 a year, making it one of the five richest countries in the World, alongside places like Norway and Switzerland, so when I read of them complaining about their economic woes from the comfort of their mac-mansions my one reaction is to think "Cry me a river!"
    Furthermore, this "Dream" was built on the crushing of all popular movements throughout the Third World, from Guillermo Arbenz in Guatemala and Mohammad Mossadegh in Iran to Jean-Bertrand Aristide of Haiti and Salvador Allende of Chile, alongside countless more examples, and replacing them with more "amenable" dictators and other sundry scumbags, who would then proceed to sow death and destruction amongst their own people whilst selling out to US corporations and taking on unrepayable debts from the IMF.
    US foreign policy has always been about exploiting weaker nations to the hilt, and on the resulting mass of dead bodies (estimated at up to 30 million people) the "American Dream" was perpetuated. US Americans are blissfully oblivious to the fact that their outrageous wealth comes not from their own hard work, but from the blood, sweat and tears of the peoples of the Third World, and for that reason the Empire must die, as must the infamous "middle class" that legitimises it in the eyes of it's populace.
    BTW Europeans and the Japanese profited massively from this "Imperial Wealth Pump" as well and should also pay the price.

    Replies: @Son of a Jedi, @dimples, @mocissepvis

    I don’t think Merica’s endless foreign meddling and destruction has to do with the Merican Dream. It’s more likely that the CIA/Deep State has always had too much money and wanted some fun.

  • @Colinsky
    @frankie p

    Was Zelenskyy's appearance in Vogue better than Kamala's spread?

    Replies: @Notsofast, @Anon

    all depends on what you mean by spread.

  • SafeNow says:

    I accept much of the blame. I was a student exactly where and when the unraveling began. (Super-elite New England university, late 60s). Spineless students like me, and of course spineless administrators and faculty, did not stop it. It was easier to simply keep our heads down. The unraveling could have been stopped right then and there quite easily, because it was just getting going. So, the “boomer blame†is correctly applied to people my age. But greater blame attaches to the faculty and administrators, who were older than I was, because they had more power.

  • Larry Romanoff says: •ï¿½Website

    Several readers have made reference to life in the US during the 50s and 60s, in the sense of The American Dream having actually existed in those days. They are essentially correct, but lack the understanding of the background cause of the appearance and dissolution of those circumstances. For those interested, here is an article which might illucidate the issue. The matter is crucially important but tragically misunderstood.

    https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/history-of-americas-labor-movement-october-17-2019/

    •ï¿½Thanks: Biff
    •ï¿½Replies: @Truth Vigilante
    @Larry Romanoff


    Several readers have made reference to life in the US during the 50s and 60s, in the sense of The American Dream having actually existed in those days.
    �
    Whether the American Dream existed or not, one thing that IS certain is that many Americans are living the American Nightmare today courtesy of the untold sums that are being doled out to fund BIG GOVERNMENT and the boondoggles devised by these parasitic bureaucrats.
    Things like:

    1) Subsidies and grants, government contracts for Green Energy swindles in pursuit of remedying a NON-PROBLEM. ie: the rise in CO2 levels.
    2) Vast sums expended on the Military-Industrial-Security-Surveillance State to maintain the illusory empire and hegemonic aspirations that America has no chance of retaining.
    3) Loans to college students (the Federal government, or should I say the taxpayers, are on the hook for something that is fast approaching $2 trillion) - most of whom will never have the capacity to pay it back seeing as they got liberal arts degrees or majored in the humanities and thus will not be earning that much as waitresses or cab drivers because they have no marketable skills.

    Anyway, to pay for this BIG GOVERNMENT the Fed has printed trillions and thus the American working class will be picking up the tab for said profligacy in the form of runaway inflation.
    Peter Schiff explains (5 min video):

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pun58IwdzQA
  • Alrenous says: •ï¿½Website
    @James J. O'Meara
    @Anonymous


    2) The “American Dream†is an invention of the media. It originally meant the Protestant’s idea of “vocationâ€: supporting yourself by doing something that helped the commonality. It was changed by Marxist media into “making lots of money by exploiting others (and more recently, “by destroying the planetâ€.
    �
    Neville, the greatest of the New Thought lecturers, emphasized that The Law (aka the law of attraction) was meant only to make our lives a little more comfortable, but also to give us convincing proof (through its successful use) of the existence of God. And then, as one becomes bored with comfort and acquisitions (see Schopenhauer), can one successfully turn away from them towards union with God (which he called The Promise). The Amish do something similar with their "wild years" or whatever they call it. Oscar Wilde: "The best way to overcome temptation is to yield to it."

    For more on Neville, see my Mysticism After Modernism: Crowley, Evola, Neville, Watts, Colin Wilson, and Other Populist Gurus (Melbourne, Australia: Manticore Press, 2020).

    Replies: @Alrenous, @Anonymous

    Oscar Wilde: “The best way to overcome temptation is to yield to it.â€

    Socrates was right: there is no evil, there is only ignorance.

    One way to learn that a thing is indeed evil is to experience it first-hand. Cure the ignorance, and now you know better. Several caveats apply. E.g. experiencing addiction is not a good way to learn about it. Lies, bullying, and political power are addictive drugs.

  • @Maowasayali
    @Alrenous

    I think Mao was more stooge than traitor. Can't say that about his nemesis Chiang Kai Shek though.

    Chiang's statement that "Communism is a disease of the heart, the Japanese are but a disease of the skin." will damn him forever as China's greatest traitor.

    How Jewish and staged was the so-called Chinese Civil War which is once again in the news?

    Chiang studied in Japan as a young man and became an officer of the Japanese Imperial Army! This certainly explains his traitorous statement above.

    General MacArthur called him by his nickname "cash my check"... which is telling and my guess is that Chiang probably never relinquished his commission and pension from the Japanese Imperial Army while he was supposedly fighting the Japs on behalf of the Yanks.

    He wanted his cake and eat it too, as they say.

    Replies: @Alrenous

    Stupidity is a crime. Whether Mao was intentionally a traitor or plain too dumb to avoid treachery, he deserved a traitor’s ignominious death.

  • Blissex says:
    @TPM
    @Anon

    Yes of course.

    The following is the Introduction to my essay "The Normalization of Fraud and Forgery" at http://werex.org/the-normalization-of-fraud-and-forgery/:

    Introduction

    For over 2000 years, since at least pre-ancient-Roman times, the balance of humanity has proved unable to protect itself from the multi-faceted fraud in the following form of terms from a banker or other nominal creditor:

    Condition 1: I will loan you $100,000 at 10% per annum, provided that you agree to give me a security claiming that I have loaned you $200,000 at 5%.
    �
    More generally, “I will loan you a certain amount at a certain rate of interest, provided that you agree to falsify the security to claim that I have loaned you a greater amount, and at a lower rate, than in fact.â€

    First, while most anyone else can see its obviously criminal and profoundly dangerous substance, bankers, lawyers, and judges have near-pathologically failed to do so. In the western world especially, most judges are former-bank-lawyers (self-styled “commercial, corporate and financial law specialistsâ€) who are themselves directly appointed by former-bank-lawyers / solicitors, most of whom (on both sides) had spent their legal careers falsifying financial securities and making personal fortunes via fees and percentage kick-backs for so doing.

    Second, that financial-fraud-device will of itself eventually channel all the wealth of the world to the possessor-class that substantively owns the private global banking system. And its pace increases exponentially with the relative amount by which the securities are falsified. It would happen very quickly and obviously with the above 50% coefficient-of-fraud, but it is no less certain – and achieved and maintained much more quietly – with an average 5% coefficient-of-fraud – it just takes a little longer – a few more roll-overs or iterations of the process.

    Now assume that the same people propose the following cure or remedy to it:

    Condition 2: To compensate for the fraudulent juicing of the bank’s balance sheet, you must also agree to pay the bank a $100,000 nominal loan fee via nominal deduction or by a cheque / check effectively drawn against the falsified / inflated security balance so as to give the bank an additional $100,000 of immediate and unearned income in contravention of all the domestic and international accounting laws against it. We are going to remedy and balance (compound-in-fact) the $100,000 fraud against the bank’s balance sheet with an additional $100,000 fraud against its income statement.
    �
    Here also, the fraud against the banks’ collective income statements will of itself eventually channel all of the wealth to the possessor-class, and this component also increases not just exponentially but cross-exponentially with both the coefficient-of-fraud and the stated (misrepresented) interest rate.

    In Canada that double-whammy extortion and cross-leveraged accounting fraud had been for generations slowly but surely transferring or rolling-over the wealth created by the people into the accounts of the possessor class. The unearned-encroachment was constant, and more or less calibrated to just keep pace with ever-increasing production gains from technology, as long as banks were not allowed to be in the real-estate financing (credit-reinsurance) business, and as long as the maximum rate of interest was restricted to 7% per annum under the Bank Act.

    Both of these critical restraints were removed in 1968 from this already profoundly criminal, but quasi / relatively stable, system. The banks and bankers, and the entrenched-money-power who own them, have never looked back.

    ___

    Just from memory, there was a movie a while back called The International where the CEO of an international bank is playing chess with his son (about 11 years old) and he says to the boy to the effect "You are in your fortress but which is surrounded by your enemies and there is no way out - What do you do?"

    The boy thinks about it for a few seconds and responds: "Find a way to go deeper in".

    Likewise, the entrenched-money-power never truly remedies any wrongful practice - but instead figures out a way to go "double-down" and then makes it worse.

    Sadly, the public keeps falling for it - generation after generation.

    Replies: @Michael Korn, @Blissex, @Blissex

    «the Introduction to my essay»

    Two further notes:

    * Your essay could be written better: I can understand what you are saying, but I know some technicalities and I am experienced in trying to make sense out of obscure writings.

    * The mechanism you describe is pretty much the core of the financial side of most PFI (“private finance initiative”) or PPP (“public private partnership”) deals which have enriched so many people and cost so much in long term payments to the public funds in the UK and other countries.

  • Blissex says:
    @TPM
    @Anon

    Yes of course.

    The following is the Introduction to my essay "The Normalization of Fraud and Forgery" at http://werex.org/the-normalization-of-fraud-and-forgery/:

    Introduction

    For over 2000 years, since at least pre-ancient-Roman times, the balance of humanity has proved unable to protect itself from the multi-faceted fraud in the following form of terms from a banker or other nominal creditor:

    Condition 1: I will loan you $100,000 at 10% per annum, provided that you agree to give me a security claiming that I have loaned you $200,000 at 5%.
    �
    More generally, “I will loan you a certain amount at a certain rate of interest, provided that you agree to falsify the security to claim that I have loaned you a greater amount, and at a lower rate, than in fact.â€

    First, while most anyone else can see its obviously criminal and profoundly dangerous substance, bankers, lawyers, and judges have near-pathologically failed to do so. In the western world especially, most judges are former-bank-lawyers (self-styled “commercial, corporate and financial law specialistsâ€) who are themselves directly appointed by former-bank-lawyers / solicitors, most of whom (on both sides) had spent their legal careers falsifying financial securities and making personal fortunes via fees and percentage kick-backs for so doing.

    Second, that financial-fraud-device will of itself eventually channel all the wealth of the world to the possessor-class that substantively owns the private global banking system. And its pace increases exponentially with the relative amount by which the securities are falsified. It would happen very quickly and obviously with the above 50% coefficient-of-fraud, but it is no less certain – and achieved and maintained much more quietly – with an average 5% coefficient-of-fraud – it just takes a little longer – a few more roll-overs or iterations of the process.

    Now assume that the same people propose the following cure or remedy to it:

    Condition 2: To compensate for the fraudulent juicing of the bank’s balance sheet, you must also agree to pay the bank a $100,000 nominal loan fee via nominal deduction or by a cheque / check effectively drawn against the falsified / inflated security balance so as to give the bank an additional $100,000 of immediate and unearned income in contravention of all the domestic and international accounting laws against it. We are going to remedy and balance (compound-in-fact) the $100,000 fraud against the bank’s balance sheet with an additional $100,000 fraud against its income statement.
    �
    Here also, the fraud against the banks’ collective income statements will of itself eventually channel all of the wealth to the possessor-class, and this component also increases not just exponentially but cross-exponentially with both the coefficient-of-fraud and the stated (misrepresented) interest rate.

    In Canada that double-whammy extortion and cross-leveraged accounting fraud had been for generations slowly but surely transferring or rolling-over the wealth created by the people into the accounts of the possessor class. The unearned-encroachment was constant, and more or less calibrated to just keep pace with ever-increasing production gains from technology, as long as banks were not allowed to be in the real-estate financing (credit-reinsurance) business, and as long as the maximum rate of interest was restricted to 7% per annum under the Bank Act.

    Both of these critical restraints were removed in 1968 from this already profoundly criminal, but quasi / relatively stable, system. The banks and bankers, and the entrenched-money-power who own them, have never looked back.

    ___

    Just from memory, there was a movie a while back called The International where the CEO of an international bank is playing chess with his son (about 11 years old) and he says to the boy to the effect "You are in your fortress but which is surrounded by your enemies and there is no way out - What do you do?"

    The boy thinks about it for a few seconds and responds: "Find a way to go deeper in".

    Likewise, the entrenched-money-power never truly remedies any wrongful practice - but instead figures out a way to go "double-down" and then makes it worse.

    Sadly, the public keeps falling for it - generation after generation.

    Replies: @Michael Korn, @Blissex, @Blissex

    «”Condition 1: [….]” […] “Condition 2: […]”»

    Quite interesting, that happens in loan sharking and hedge funds and private equity (the asset stripping sector), but I guess this is disguised by big “official” “respectable” banks.

    In any case it has been a long time since big “official” “respectable” banks made money with loans, however “juiced” by conditions 1&2: they now seek to make their money with asset trading where proprietary asset trading is financed on margin by themselves. To work around regulations about self-dealing, they have setup debt-collateral spiral rings.

  • Blissex says:
    @MaxD
    MeanWhile in the USA, the homefront looks bleak and costly:

    https://twitter.censors.us/JordanChariton/status/1551377407986262018?cursor=LBlGgIC85bT6zIcrgIC%2B6eu5zYcrgICwjczBz4crgoCz6e3a04crJQISAAA%3D#r

    @JordanChariton
    Jul 25
    In 7 days reporting on the road, every person I've spoken to is struggling: from homelessness, to facing eviction, to scrounging for change to fill up car, to selling home to keep business open, to shutting down a business OPEN FOR 90 YEARS.
    Stop the BS.

    Replies: @Blissex

    «In 7 days reporting on the road, every person I’ve spoken to is struggling:»

    Indeed most usians (and british etc.) are getting squeezed, but a large minority of real estate (and share) owners and in the remaining “good jobs” are doing splendidly. That’s the American way: winners must win, losers must lose, and the Fed’s “plunge protection team” is there to put as many trillions as needed to ensure that real estate and finance are doing very well.

    Since Reagan in the USA the rewards of work and thrift have been miserly and the rewards of real estate and finance have ben stupendous. Those who chose wrong, or chose to be born too late or in the wrong place to buy real estate and shares cheaply, are paying for their mistakes, and the large minority of those who chose right, or chose to be born earlier and in the right places are enjoying booming living standards, well supported by generous government policies.

  • @Alrenous
    @Maowasayali

    Mao was an American stooge, yes.

    Modern China is largely anti-Fascist instead. However 1) Confucianism is a weak culture that can't well resist fanatics from elsewhere and 2) conformists gonna over-mimic. They have a central bank not because they think it's a good idea but because they're copying America and America has a central bank. They're not acting out of understanding - if they were, they wouldn't have needed to use America as a model in the first place. They've noticed some of the old lies but have only a disappointing ability to resist new lies.

    Secondarily dishonouring Mao is considered 'unfilial' even though he was a traitor and worthy only of a traitor's death. "You can't do that, he's family." Discarding social illusions when they conflict with physics is a Socratic thing, and even the Occident doesn't do that anymore.

    Replies: @Maowasayali

    I think Mao was more stooge than traitor. Can’t say that about his nemesis Chiang Kai Shek though.

    Chiang’s statement that “Communism is a disease of the heart, the Japanese are but a disease of the skin.” will damn him forever as China’s greatest traitor.

    How Jewish and staged was the so-called Chinese Civil War which is once again in the news?

    Chiang studied in Japan as a young man and became an officer of the Japanese Imperial Army! This certainly explains his traitorous statement above.

    General MacArthur called him by his nickname “cash my check”… which is telling and my guess is that Chiang probably never relinquished his commission and pension from the Japanese Imperial Army while he was supposedly fighting the Japs on behalf of the Yanks.

    He wanted his cake and eat it too, as they say.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Alrenous
    @Maowasayali

    Stupidity is a crime. Whether Mao was intentionally a traitor or plain too dumb to avoid treachery, he deserved a traitor's ignominious death.
  • Hoyeru says:

    the thing that NOBODY discusses or mentions is how the fake American “prosperity” acted as a buffer and a cushion to the American society and made the “melting pot” possible and kept the crime rate kinda low (except in teh ghettos but who cares about them, right, the more blacks kill each other, the better).
    So now expect the crime rate in America to skyrocket; and the criminals to begin moving and zeroing the rich areas. And it’s ALL by design, once again, the government will eventually use the crime rate to introduce very restrictive laws.

  • 💣’Murka💰 dreamt big things.
    Went to far shores to get bling.
    Forgot judgment’s sting.

    •ï¿½Agree: Realist
  • @frankie p
    @JR Foley

    Zylenskky isn't a comedian. He is now a high level fashion model, and he and his wife have a massive spread in the latest issue of Vogue photographed by world famous photographer Annie Lebowitz. It seems blood red is the color for the Summer/Fall collection.

    This would be unthinkable and hilarious if it weren't so Jewish.
    Hey, CIA, kill that man. I know, Biden wants you to hold off until September or October so he can negotiate personally with Putin, reach an agreement, and try to label himself as a peacemaker just in time for the midterm elections.
    But Zelenskky is Jewing so f...ing hard, displaying chutzpah on a scale only attainable for the Ashkenaz. Get rid of him.

    Replies: @Anymike, @Colinsky

    Was Zelenskyy’s appearance in Vogue better than Kamala’s spread?

    •ï¿½Agree: JR Foley
    •ï¿½Replies: @Notsofast
    @Colinsky

    all depends on what you mean by spread.
    , @Anon
    @Colinsky

    You ruined my appetite for the day by writing "Kamala's spread."
  • Blissex says:
    July 28, 2022 at 9:33 pm GMT •ï¿½200 Words

    This article is based on the usual “leftoid” hallucination that only the 1% are winning and the 99% are getting poorer, but actually the political power of the 1% is supported by the top 20-40%, who have been doing very well for 40 years, mostly thanks to booming real estate prices.

    Neoliberal politics are an alliance of the property-owning upper-middle class and the upper classes against the working class, with the lower-middle class being neutral because they are not gaining but they are not losing much either.

    And indeed the real direct poison of USA politics is real estate (and share prices): as long as the upper-middle classes make fortunes thanks to the devoted efforts of the FedRes pumping up credit with which to buy it (and shares). Thanks to that huge redistribution from the lower classes, the upper-middle class have been writing a blank cheque to the neoliberal governments of the past 40 years.

    The “American Dream” is “Fuck you! I got mine” and the USA (and UK) upper-middle classes are living it, making a lot of profits on assets and nearly monopolizing the better-paid jobs, iand too bad for the 60-80% of the population they don’t care about.

    The big political problem of the USA (etc.) is that rentierism is not limited to a small minority, but in a lesser way a large and powerful minority are also benefiting. Mass rentierism is a big new thing, and hallucinating that only the 1% are benefiting leads to completely wrong thinking.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Bro43rd
    @Blissex

    Maybe 5% but 20-40% is ludicrous. Some of us in the top quintile worked (masonry) hard & saved to get here. And inflation is kicking our asses too. There is a rentier class and it's the .01%. The rest of us are along for the ride & have no choice in the matter.

    Replies: @Blissex
  • @David Homer
    Romanoff redefines the American dream as something that it never was and then picks apart his own creation. Is an article like this posted on UNZ just to get a lot of comments? It surely is not posted here because it has any merit or value to the reader. I am through with reading any article by this author. There is much more to read that is worth my time.

    Replies: @Bro43rd

    Yes

  • I sense that, all commentators here at the Unz Review — as well as the essay-writer Larry Romanoff — have totally and essentially MISUNDERSTOOD the perennial concept called “American Dream”.

    “American Dream” is actually like a tasty doughnut; you are either in the dough or in the hole!

  • Out thru the night
    And the whispering breezes.
    To a place where they keep
    The imaginary diseases.
    – FZ

  • @Anonymous
    1) This entire article is simply Marxist dogma. "People have a false consciousness unless they realize that they are being exploited."

    2) The "American Dream" is an invention of the media. It originally meant the Protestant's idea of "vocation": supporting yourself by doing something that helped the commonality. It was changed by Marxist media into "making lots of money by exploiting others (and more recently, "by destroying the planet".

    3) "American Exceptionalism" is also a media invention. It originally meant that the US was the sole government on the planet in which the voting population was legally sovereign. It was changed by Marxist media into "The US thinks it can exploit the rest of the planet, even destroy it, and nobody can stop them".

    4) Obvious propaganda such as this article is looking more and more like an assault by a totalitarian group that deeply believes in protecting people from exploitation, starting and ending with themselves.

    Replies: @James J. O'Meara

    2) The “American Dream†is an invention of the media. It originally meant the Protestant’s idea of “vocationâ€: supporting yourself by doing something that helped the commonality. It was changed by Marxist media into “making lots of money by exploiting others (and more recently, “by destroying the planetâ€.

    Neville, the greatest of the New Thought lecturers, emphasized that The Law (aka the law of attraction) was meant only to make our lives a little more comfortable, but also to give us convincing proof (through its successful use) of the existence of God. And then, as one becomes bored with comfort and acquisitions (see Schopenhauer), can one successfully turn away from them towards union with God (which he called The Promise). The Amish do something similar with their “wild years” or whatever they call it. Oscar Wilde: “The best way to overcome temptation is to yield to it.”

    For more on Neville, see my Mysticism After Modernism: Crowley, Evola, Neville, Watts, Colin Wilson, and Other Populist Gurus (Melbourne, Australia: Manticore Press, 2020).

    •ï¿½Replies: @Alrenous
    @James J. O'Meara


    Oscar Wilde: “The best way to overcome temptation is to yield to it.â€
    �
    Socrates was right: there is no evil, there is only ignorance.

    One way to learn that a thing is indeed evil is to experience it first-hand. Cure the ignorance, and now you know better. Several caveats apply. E.g. experiencing addiction is not a good way to learn about it. Lies, bullying, and political power are addictive drugs.
    , @Anonymous
    @James J. O'Meara


    The Law (aka the law of attraction) was meant only to make our lives a little more comfortable, but also to give us convincing proof (through its successful use) of the existence of God. And then, as one becomes bored with comfort and acquisitions (see Schopenhauer), can one successfully turn away from them towards union with God (which he called The Promise).
    �
    That is a highly American thought. If you think that God loves his creation, then you have to consider the Problem of Pain. One solution is that God has presented a way to live in His physical creation, one that works as describe in the Blockquote above, and is embodied in the Protestant idea of vocation.

    Note that this differs from the Jewish idea of relations with God. The Jewish idea is embodied with the story of Jacob who wrestled with a angel or maybe God, hard for a human to say, then changed his name to Israel, "Fights with God and Wins" ( Genesis 32:28). Ever since then Judaism has been about fighting with God (and everybody else) and winning. That's not he same as following God's commandments so as to find your place in reality and realize God's place in reality (i.e. as its Creator and Master).

    One could make similar analyses of Islam, Buddhism, Shinto, Hinduism, and so on, each of which has a different relation between God (or gods) and man.

    Communist would amount to following the Party's commandments so as to find your place in reality and realize that reality is independent of God (if such a being exists) and realize the humans in the Party's place in reality (i.e. as its Creator and master). In contemporary jargon: "Everything important is a social construct, subject to reconstruction at the Woke Party's command.

    Replies: @shadowy_figure
  • It sometimes seems that half the content of US bookstores consists of what we call ‘self-help’ books, meant to give us ‘the real secret’ to success and riches. Of course, if one book ever did do that, there would be no need for a second. The secret contained in these books is mostly limited to some variation of “You have to believeâ€. And when you fail to strike gold, as you inevitably will, then your belief just wasn’t strong enough.

    “Whether you think you can, or think you can’t, you’re right” — Henry Ford, self-made American success (and based on the JQ btw)

    This seems to be becoming a meme on the Lite Right — the Zman was pounding away on this today as well. New Thought/Positive Thinking/Law of Attraction/The Secret has little to do with “just believe”. That’s like saying “This guy was baptized as an infant, but he went on to commit many sins, so Christianity is phony.”

    Tempting as it is to conflate them, it has little to do with reciting “The Narrative,”

    As Neville, the greatest NT lecturer emphasized, feeling is the secret. Once a scenario is thought up, it must be invested with emotional warmth so as to quicken into reality.

    Listen to how the entomologists talk about how Buffalo Bill raises moths in The Silence of the Lambs.

    It has little to do with Christianity as such; it is the common Truth behind most religious and mystical teachings, such as Hermeticism and Neoplatonism in the West. Evola, for you Alt-Right nerds, talks about it in his Magic books.

    Does it work? Well, if you do it right, yes. Neville’s family used his method to grow his father’s Barbados grocery store into the largest Caribbean-based conglomerate in the world, still in operation today: Goddard Enterprises.

    For more on this, see my Mysticism After Modernism: Crowley, Evola, Neville, Watts, Colin Wilson, and Other Populist Gurus (Melbourne, Australia: Manticore Press, 2020).

  • Alrenous says: •ï¿½Website
    July 28, 2022 at 8:21 pm GMT •ï¿½100 Words
    @HallParvey
    @Anon


    America has always been a stealth Catholic theocracy
    �
    The original protest by Martin Luther, was not protesting the teachings of the Church of Rome. He was protesting the fact that the hierarchy of the Church, in his day, was not Catholic Christian enough.

    Something like today with the modern Pope. Then, it was indulgences, "Get Out of Hell Free" cards being sold to rich people, that offended Luther.

    Nothing much has changed. Look up the annulment issued to Teddy K. Money really can buy anybody. Even God.


    Genesis chapter 3
    �
    I do believe that is from the ancestral history of the Children of Israel. An early version of Ancestry.com.

    Replies: @Alrenous

    The Woke’s complaint is exactly like Luther’s: they think Christianity isn’t Christian enough. Zimmerman and Rittenhouse should have turned the other cheek. Chauvin judged, and was judged in turn. Anti-global warming measures are intended to impoverish everyone, because don’t you know a camel can’t pass through the eye of a needle? It’s for your own good.