');
The Unz Review •ï¿½An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library •ï¿½B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


�Remember My InformationWhy?
�Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Alastair Crooke Ambrose Kane Anatoly Karlin Andrew Anglin Andrew Joyce Audacious Epigone Boyd D. Cathey C.J. Hopkins E. Michael Jones Eric Margolis Eric Striker Fred Reed Gilad Atzmon Godfree Roberts Gregory Hood Guillaume Durocher Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir James Kirkpatrick James Thompson Jared Taylor John Derbyshire Jonathan Cook Jung-Freud Karlin Community Kevin Barrett Kevin MacDonald Lance Welton Larry Romanoff Laurent Guyénot Linh Dinh Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Kersey Pepe Escobar Peter Frost Philip Giraldi Razib Khan Ron Unz Steve Sailer The Saker Tobias Langdon A. Graham A. J. Smuskiewicz A Southerner Academic Research Group UK Staff Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Agha Hussain Ahmad Al Khaled Ahmet Öncü Alain De Benoist Alan Macleod Albemarle Man Alex Graham Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alexander Jacob Alexander Wolfheze Alfred McCoy Alison Weir Allan Wall Allegra Harpootlian Amalric De Droevig Amr Abozeid Anand Gopal Anastasia Katz Andre Damon Andre Vltchek Andreas Canetti Andrei Martyanov Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andrew Hamilton Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Napolitano Andrew S. Fischer Andy Kroll Angie Saxon Ann Jones Anna Tolstoyevskaya Anne Wilson Smith Anonymous Anonymous American Anonymous Attorney Anonymous Occidental Anthony Boehm Anthony Bryan Anthony DiMaggio Tony Hall Antiwar Staff Antonius Aquinas Antony C. Black Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor AudaciousEpigone Augustin Goland Austen Layard Ava Muhammad Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Kissin Barry Lando Barton Cockey Beau Albrecht Belle Chesler Ben Fountain Ben Freeman Ben Sullivan Benjamin Villaroel Bernard M. Smith Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Blake Archer Williams Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Book Brad Griffin Bradley Moore Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brett Wilkins Brian Dew Brian McGlinchey Brian R. Wright Brittany Smith C.D. Corax Cara Marianna Carl Boggs Carl Horowitz Carolyn Yeager Cat McGuire Catherine Crump César Keller Chalmers Johnson Chanda Chisala Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlie O'Neill Charlottesville Survivor Chase Madar Chauke Stephan Filho Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Chris Woltermann Christian Appy Christophe Dolbeau Christopher DeGroot Christopher Donovan Christopher Ketcham Chuck Spinney Civus Non Nequissimus CODOH Editors Coleen Rowley Colin Liddell Cooper Sterling Craig Murray Cynthia Chung D.F. Mulder Dahr Jamail Dakota Witness Dan E. Phillips Dan Roodt Dan Sanchez Daniel Barge Daniel McAdams Daniel Moscardi Daniel Vinyard Danny Sjursen Dave Chambers Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Boyajian David Bromwich David Chibo David Chu David Gordon David Haggith David Irving David L. McNaron David Lorimer David Martin David North David Stockman David Vine David Walsh David William Pear David Yorkshire Dean Baker Declan Hayes Dennis Dale Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Diego Ramos Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Dmitriy Kalyagin Donald Thoresen Alan Sabrosky Dr. Ejaz Akram Dr. Ridgely Abdul Mu’min Muhammad Dries Van Langenhove E. Frederick Stevens Eamonn Fingleton Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Edward Curtin Edward Dutton Egbert Dijkstra Egor Kholmogorov Ehud Shapiro Ekaterina Blinova Ellen Brown Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Emil Kirkegaard Emilio García Gómez Emma Goldman Enzo Porter Eric Draitser Eric Paulson Eric Peters Eric Rasmusen Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Gant Eugene Girin Eugene Kusmiak Eve Mykytyn F. Roger Devlin Fadi Abu Shammalah Fantine Gardinier Federale Fenster Fergus Hodgson Finian Cunningham The First Millennium Revisionist Fordham T. Smith Former Agent Forum Francis Goumain Frank Tipler Franklin Lamb Franklin Stahl Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Gary Corseri Gary Heavin Gary North Gary Younge Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Galloway George Koo George Mackenzie George Szamuely Georgianne Nienaber Gilbert Cavanaugh Gilbert Doctorow Giles Corey Glen K. Allen Glenn Greenwald A. Beaujean Agnostic Alex B. Amnestic Arcane Asher Bb Bbartlog Ben G Birch Barlow Canton ChairmanK Chrisg Coffee Mug Darth Quixote David David B David Boxenhorn DavidB Diana Dkane DMI Dobeln Duende Dylan Ericlien Fly Gcochran Godless Grady Herrick Jake & Kara Jason Collins Jason Malloy Jason�s Jeet Jemima Joel John Emerson John Quiggin JP Kele Kjmtchl Mark Martin Matoko Kusanagi Matt Matt McIntosh Michael Vassar Miko Ml Ole P-ter Piccolino Rosko Schizmatic Scorpius Suman TangoMan The Theresa Thorfinn Thrasymachus Wintz Gonzalo Lira Graham Seibert Grant M. Dahl Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Greg Klein Gregg Stanley Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Conte Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Gunnar Alfredsson Gustavo Arellano Hank Johnson Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Hans Vogel Harri Honkanen Heiner Rindermann Henry Cockburn Hewitt E. Moore Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Howe Abbot-Hiss Hua Bin Hubert Collins Hugh Kennedy Hugh McInnish Hugh Moriarty Hugo Dionísio Hunter DeRensis Hunter Wallace Huntley Haverstock Ian Fantom Ian Proud Ichabod Thornton Igor Shafarevich Ira Chernus Irmin Vinson Ivan Kesić J. Alfred Powell J.B. Clark J.D. Gore J. Ricardo Martins Jacek Szela Jack Antonio Jack Dalton Jack Kerwick Jack Krak Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen Jake Bowyer James Bovard James Carroll James Carson Harrington James Chang James Dunphy James Durso James Edwards James Fulford James Gillespie James Hanna James J. O'Meara James K. Galbraith James Karlsson James Lawrence James Petras Jane Lazarre Jane Weir Janice Kortkamp Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Cannon Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jayant Bhandari JayMan Jean Bricmont Jean Marois Jean Ranc Jef Costello Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey D. Sachs Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jesse Mossman JHR Writers Jim Daniel Jim Fetzer Jim Goad Jim Kavanagh Jim Smith JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Dackman Joe Lauria Joel S. Hirschhorn Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Gorman John Harrison Sims John Helmer John Hill John Huss John J. Mearsheimer John Jackson John Kiriakou John Macdonald John Morgan John Patterson John Leonard John Pilger John Q. Publius John Rand John Reid John Ryan John Scales Avery John Siman John Stauber John T. Kelly John Taylor John Titus John Tremain John V. Walsh John Wear John Williams Jon Else Jon Entine Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Revusky Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Sawyer Jonathan Schell Jordan Henderson Jordan Steiner Jose Alberto Nino Joseph Kay Joseph Kishore Joseph Sobran Josephus Tiberius Josh Neal Jeshurun Tsarfat Juan Cole Judith Coburn Julian Bradford Julian Macfarlane K.J. Noh Kacey Gunther Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Karl Haemers Karl Nemmersdorf Karl Thorburn Kees Van Der Pijl Keith Woods Kelley Vlahos Kenn Gividen Kenneth Vinther Kerry Bolton Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin Folta Kevin Michael Grace Kevin Rothrock Kevin Sullivan Kevin Zeese Kit Klarenberg Kshama Sawant Larry C. Johnson Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Lawrence Erickson Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Leonard C. Goodman Leonard R. Jaffee Liam Cosgrove Lidia Misnik Lilith Powell Linda Preston Lipton Matthews Liv Heide Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett Louis Farrakhan Lydia Brimelow M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maciej Pieczyński Mahmoud Khalil Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marco De Wit Marcus Alethia Marcus Apostate Marcus Cicero Marcus Devonshire Margaret Flowers Margot Metroland Marian Evans Mark Allen Mark Bratchikov-Pogrebisskiy Mark Crispin Miller Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Gullick Mark H. Gaffney Mark Lu Mark O'Brien Mark Perry Mark Weber Marshall Yeats Martin Jay Martin K. O'Toole Martin Lichtmesz Martin Webster Martin Witkerk Mary Phagan-Kean Matt Cockerill Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Caldwell Matthew Ehret Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max Jones Max North Max Parry Max West Maya Schenwar Merlin Miller Metallicman Michael A. Roberts Michael Averko Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Hoffman Michael Masterson Michael Quinn Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Michelle Malkin Miko Peled Mnar Muhawesh Moon Landing Skeptic Morgan Jones Morris V. De Camp Mr. Anti-Humbug Muhammed Abu Murray Polner N. Joseph Potts Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Nathan Cofnas Nathan Doyle Ned Stark Neil Kumar Nelson Rosit Niall McCrae Nicholas R. Jeelvy Nicholas Stix Nick Griffin Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Nicolás Palacios Navarro Nils Van Der Vegte Noam Chomsky NOI Research Group Nomi Prins Norman Finkelstein Norman Solomon OldMicrobiologist Oliver Boyd-Barrett Oliver Williams Oscar Grau P.J. Collins Pádraic O'Bannon Patrice Greanville Patrick Armstrong Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Patrick Lawrence Patrick Martin Patrick McDermott Patrick Whittle Paul Bennett Paul Cochrane Paul De Rooij Paul Edwards Paul Engler Paul Gottfried Paul Larudee Paul Mitchell Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Paul Souvestre Paul Tripp Pedro De Alvarado Peter Baggins Ph.D. Peter Bradley Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Lee Peter Van Buren Philip Kraske Philip Weiss Pierre M. Sprey Pierre Simon Povl H. Riis-Knudsen Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Qasem Soleimani Rachel Marsden Raches Radhika Desai Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ralph Raico Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Ramzy Baroud Randy Shields Raul Diego Ray McGovern Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Reginald De Chantillon Rémi Tremblay Rev. Matthew Littlefield Ricardo Duchesne Richard Cook Richard Falk Richard Foley Richard Galustian Richard Houck Richard Hugus Richard Knight Richard Krushnic Richard McCulloch Richard Parker Richard Silverstein Richard Solomon Rick Shenkman Rick Sterling Rita Rozhkova Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Debrus Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Fisk Robert Hampton Robert Henderson Robert Inlakesh Robert LaFlamme Robert Lindsay Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Stark Robert Stevens Robert Trivers Robert Wallace Robert Weissberg Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Rolo Slavskiy Romana Rubeo Romanized Visigoth Ron Paul Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning RT Staff Ruuben Kaalep Ryan Andrews Ryan Dawson Sabri Öncü Salim Mansur Sam Dickson Sam Francis Sam Husseini Samuel Sequeira Sayed Hasan Scot Olmstead Scott Howard Scott Locklin Scott Ritter Servando Gonzalez Sharmine Narwani Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Sidney James Sietze Bosman Sigurd Kristensen Sinclair Jenkins Southfront Editor Spencer Davenport Spencer J. Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen F. Cohen Stephen J. Rossi Stephen J. Sniegoski Stephen Paul Foster Sterling Anderson Steve Fraser Steve Keen Steve Penfield Steven Farron Steven Yates Subhankar Banerjee Susan Southard Sydney Schanberg Talia Mullin Tanya Golash-Boza Taxi Taylor McClain Taylor Young Ted O'Keefe Ted Rall The Crew The Zman Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas A. Fudge Thomas Anderson Thomas Hales Thomas Dalton Thomas Ertl Thomas Frank Thomas Hales Thomas Jackson Thomas O. Meehan Thomas Steuben Thomas Zaja Thorsten J. Pattberg Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Timothy Vorgenss Timur Fomenko Tingba Muhammad Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Engelhardt Tom Mysiewicz Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Torin Murphy Tracy Rosenberg Travis LeBlanc Trevor Lynch Vernon Thorpe Virginia Dare Vito Klein Vladimir Brovkin Vladimir Putin Vladislav Krasnov Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walt King Walter E. Block Warren Balogh Washington Watcher Washington Watcher II Wayne Allensworth Wei Ling Chua Wesley Muhammad White Man Faculty Whitney Webb Wilhelm Kriessmann Wilhem Ivorsson Will Jones Will Offensicht William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Wyatt Peterson Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen Yaroslav Podvolotskiy Yvonne Lorenzo Zhores Medvedev
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2020 Election Academia American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Benjamin Netanyahu Black Crime Black Lives Matter Blacks Britain Censorship China China/America Conspiracy Theories Covid Culture/Society Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy Gaza Genocide Hamas History Holocaust Ideology Immigration IQ Iran Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Joe Biden NATO Nazi Germany Neocons Open Thread Political Correctness Race/Ethnicity Russia Science Ukraine Vladimir Putin World War II 汪精衛 100% Jussie-free Content 1984 2008 Election 2012 Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2022 Election 2024 Election 23andMe 9/11 Abortion Abraham Lincoln Abu Mehdi Muhandas Academy Awards Achievement Gap ACLU Acting White Adam Schiff Addiction ADL Admin Administration Admixture Adolf Hitler Advertising AfD Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Afrocentricism Age Age Of Malthusian Industrialism Agriculture AI AIPAC Air Force Aircraft Carriers Airlines Airports Al Jazeera Al Qaeda Al-Shifa Alain Soral Alan Clemmons Alan Dershowitz Albania Albert Einstein Albion's Seed Alcoholism Alejandro Mayorkas Alex Jones Alexander Dugin Alexander Vindman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Alexei Navalny Algeria Ali Dawabsheh Alien And Sedition Acts Alison Nathan Alt Right Altruism Amazon Amazon.com America America First American Civil War American Dream American History American Indians American Israel Public Affairs Committee American Jews American Left American Nations American Presidents American Prisons American Renaissance Amerindians Amish Amnesty Amnesty International Amos Hochstein Amy Klobuchar Amygdala Anarchism Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Greece Ancient Rome Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Bacevich Andrew Sullivan Andrew Yang Anglo-America Anglo-imperialism Anglo-Saxons Anglos Anglosphere Angola Animal IQ Animal Rights Wackos Animals Ann Coulter Anne Frank Anthony Blinken Anthony Fauci Anthrax Anthropology Anti-Defamation League Anti-Gentilism Anti-Semites Anti-Vaccination Anti-Vaxx Anti-white Animus Antifa Antifeminism Antiquity Antiracism Antisemitism Antisemitism Awareness Act Antisocial Behavior Antizionism Antony Blinken Apartheid Apartheid Israel Apollo's Ascent Appalachia Apple Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaeogenetics Archaeology Archaic DNA Architecture Arctic Arctic Sea Ice Melting Argentina Ariel Sharon Armageddon War Armenia Armenian Genocide Army Arnold Schwarzenegger Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Jensen Arthur Lichte Artificial Intelligence Arts/Letters Aryan Invasion Theory Aryans Aryeh Lightstone Ash Carter Ashkenazi Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians Assassination Assassinations Assimilation Atheism Atlanta AUMF Auschwitz Australia Australian Aboriginals Automation Avril Haines Ayn Rand Azerbaijan Azov Brigade Babes And Hunks Baby Gap Balfour Declaration Balkans Balochistan Baltics Baltimore Riots Banjamin Netanyahu Banking Industry Banking System Banks #BanTheADL Barack Obama Baseball Statistics Bashar Al-Assad Basketball #BasketOfDeplorables BBC BDS BDS Movement Beauty Beethoven Behavior Genetics Behavioral Genetics Bela Belarus Belgium Belgrade Embassy Bombing Ben Cardin Ben Rhodes Ben Shapiro Ben Stiller Benny Gantz Bernard Henri-Levy Bernie Sanders Betsy DeVos Betty McCollum Bezalel Smotrich Bezalel Yoel Smotrich Biden BigPost Bilateral Relations Bilingual Education Bill Clinton Bill De Blasio Bill Gates Bill Kristol Bill Maher Bill Of Rights Billionaires Billy Graham Bioethics Biology Bioweapons Birmingham Birth Rate Bitcoin Black Community Black History Month Black Muslims Black Panthers Black People Black Slavery BlackLivesMatter Blackmail BlackRock Blake Masters Blank Slatism BLM Blog Blogging Blogosphere Blond Hair Blood Libel Blue Eyes Boasian Anthropology Boeing Boers Bolshevik Revolution Bolshevik Russia Books Boomers Border Wall Boris Johnson Bosnia Boycott Divest And Sanction Brain Drain Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Bret Stephens Bretton Woods Brexit Brezhnev Bri Brian Mast BRICs Brighter Brains British Empire British Labour Party British Politics Buddhism Build The Wall Bulldog Bush Business Byzantine Caitlin Johnstone California Californication Camp Of The Saints Canada Cancer Candace Owens Capitalism Carlos Slim Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Cars Carthaginians Catalonia Catholic Church Catholicism Catholics Cats Caucasus CCP CDC Ceasefire Cecil Rhodes Census Central Asia Central Intelligence Agency Chanda Chisala Chaos And Order Charles De Gaulle Charles Lindbergh Charles Manson Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charlie Hebdo Charlottesville ChatGPT Checheniest Chechen Of Them All Chechens Chechnya Chernobyl Chetty Chicago Chicagoization Chicken Hut Child Abuse Children Chile China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese IQ Chinese Language Christian Zionists Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Christopher Wray Chuck Schumer CIA Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil Rights Movement Civil War Civilization Clannishness Clash Of Civilizations Class Classical Antiquity Classical History Classical Music Clayton County Climate Climate Change Clint Eastwood Clintons Coal Coalition Of The Fringes Coen Brothers Cognitive Elitism Cognitive Science Cold Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Woodard College Admission College Football Colonialism Color Revolution Columbia University Columbus Comic Books Communism Computers Confederacy Confederate Flag Confucianism Congress Conquistador-American Conservatism Conservative Movement Conservatives Conspiracy Theory Constantinople Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumerism Controversial Book Convergence Core Article Corona Corporatism Corruption COTW Counterpunch Country Music Cousin Marriage Cover Story COVID-19 Craig Murray Creationism Crime Crimea Crispr Critical Race Theory Cruise Missiles Crusades Crying Among The Farmland Cryptocurrency Ctrl-Left Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckery Cuckservatism Cuckservative CUFI Cuisine Cultural Marxism Culture Culture War Curfew Czars Czech Republic DACA Daily Data Dump Dallas Shooting Damnatio Memoriae Dan Bilzarian Danny Danon Daren Acemoglu Darwinism Darya Dugina Data Data Analysis Dave Chappelle David Bazelon David Brog David Friedman David Frum David Irving David Lynch David Petraeus Davide Piffer Davos Death Of The West Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Deborah Lipstadt Debt Debt Jubilee Decadence Deep State DeepSeek Deficits Degeneracy Democracy Democratic Party Demograhics Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denmark Dennis Ross Department Of Education Department Of Homeland Security Deplatforming Derek Chauvin Detroit Development Dick Cheney Diet Digital Yuan Dinesh D'Souza Discrimination Disease Disinformation Disney Disparate Impact Disraeli Dissent Dissidence Diversity Diversity Before Diversity Diversity Pokemon Points Divorce DNA Dogs Dollar Domestic Surveillance Domestic Terrorism Doomsday Clock Dostoevsky Doug Emhoff Doug Feith Dresden Drone War Drones Drug Laws Drugs Duterte Dysgenic Dystopia E. Michael Jones E. O. Wilson East Asia East Asian Exception East Asians East Turkestan Eastern Europe Ebrahim Raisi Economic Development Economic History Economic Sanctions Economy Ecuador Edmund Burke Edmund Burke Foundation Education Edward Snowden Effective Altruism Effortpost Efraim Zurofff Egor Kholmogorov Egypt Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2020 Election Fraud Elections Electric Cars Eli Rosenbaum Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elise Stefanik Elites Elizabeth Holmes Elizabeth Warren Elliot Abrams Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emmanuel Macron Emmett Till Employment Energy England Entertainment Environment Environmentalism Epidemiology Equality Erdogan Eretz Israel Eric Zemmour Ernest Hemingway Espionage Espionage Act Estonia Ethics Ethics And Morals Ethiopia Ethnic Cleansing Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity Ethnocentricty EU Eugene Debs Eugenics Eurabia Eurasia Euro Europe European Genetics European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Genetics Evolutionary Psychology Existential Risks Eye Color Face Shape Facebook Faces Fake News False Flag Attack Family Fantasy FARA Farmers Fascism Fast Food FBI FDA FDD Federal Reserve Feminism Ferguson Ferguson Shooting Fermi Paradox Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Finland Finn Baiting First Amendment FISA Fitness Flash Mobs Flight From White Floyd Riots 2020 Fluctuarius Argenteus Flynn Effect Food Football For Fun Forecasts Foreign Agents Registration Act Foreign Aid Foreign Policy Fourth Amendment Fox News France Francesca Albanese Frank Salter Frankfurt School Franklin D. Roosevelt Franz Boas Fraud Freakonomics Fred Kagan Free Market Free Speech Free Trade Freedom Of Speech Freedom French Revolution Friedrich Karl Berger Friends Of The Israel Defense Forces Frivolty Frontlash Furkan Dogan Future Futurism G20 Gambling Game Game Of Thrones Gavin McInnes Gavin Newsom Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians GDP Gen Z Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Equality Gender Reassignment Gene-Culture Coevolution Genealogy General Intelligence General Motors Generation Z Generational Gap Genes Genetic Diversity Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Genghis Khan Genocide Convention Genomics Gentrification Geography Geopolitics George Floyd George Galloway George Patton George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush Georgia Germans Germany Ghislaine Maxwell Gilad Atzmon Gina Peddy Giorgia Meloni Gladwell Glenn Greenwald Global Warming Globalism Globalization Globo-Homo God Gold Golf Gonzalo Lira Google Government Government Debt Government Overreach Government Spending Government Surveillance Government Waste Goyim Grant Smith Graphs Great Bifurcation Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Powers Great Replacement Greece Greeks Greenland Greg Cochran Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Greta Thunberg Grooming Group Selection GSS Guardian Guest Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns GWAS Gypsies H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Haiti Hajnal Line Halloween HammerHate Hannibal Procedure Happening Happiness Harvard Harvard University Harvey Weinstein Hassan Nasrallah Hate Crimes Fraud Hoax Hate Hoaxes Hate Speech Hbd Hbd Chick Health Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Hegira Height Henry Harpending Henry Kissinger Heredity Heritability Hezbollah High Speed Rail Hillary Clinton Hindu Caste System Hindus Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanics Historical Genetics History Of Science Hitler HIV/AIDS Hoax Holland Hollywood Holocaust Denial Holocaust Deniers Holy Roman Empire Homelessness Homicide Homicide Rate Hominin Homomania Homosexuality Hong Kong Houellebecq Housing Houthis Howard Kohr Huawei Hubbert's Peak Huddled Masses Huey Newton Hug Thug Human Achievement Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Evolutionary Genetics Human Evolutionary Genomics Human Genetics Human Genomics Human Rights Human Rights Watch Humor Hungary Hunt For The Great White Defendant Hunter Biden Hunter-Gatherers I.F. Stone I.Q. I.Q. Genomics #IBelieveInHavenMonahan ICC Icj Ideas Identity Ideology And Worldview IDF Idiocracy Igbo Ilan Pappe Ilhan Omar Illegal Immigration Ilyushin IMF Impeachment Imperialism Imran Awan Inbreeding Income India Indian Indian IQ Indians Individualism Indo-Europeans Indonesia Inequality Inflation Intelligence Intelligence Agencies Intelligent Design International International Comparisons International Court Of Justice International Criminal Court International Relations Internet Interracial Marriage Interracism Intersectionality Intifada Intra-Racism Intraracism Invade Invite In Hock Invade The World Invite The World Iosef Stalin Iosif Stalin Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iranian Nuclear Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Irish Is Love Colorblind Isaac Herzog ISIS Islam Islamic Jihad Islamic State Islamism Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Bonds Israel Defense Force Israel Defense Forces Israel Separation Wall Israeli Occupation IT Italy Itamar Ben-Gvir It's Okay To Be White Ivanka Ivy League J Street Jacky Rosen Jair Bolsonaro Jake Sullivan Jake Tapper Jamal Khashoggi James Angleton James Clapper James Comey James Forrestal James Jeffrey James Mattis James Watson James Zogby Janet Yellen Janice Yellen Japan Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Greenblatt JASTA JCPOA JD Vance Jeb Bush Jeffrey Epstein Jeffrey Goldberg Jeffrey Sachs Jen Psaki Jennifer Rubin Jens Stoltenberg Jeremy Corbyn Jerry Seinfeld Jerusalem Jerusalem Post Jesuits Jesus Jesus Christ Jewish Genetics Jewish History Jewish Intellectuals Jewish Power Jewish Power Party Jewish Supremacism JFK Assassination JFK Jr. Jihadis Jill Stein Jimmy Carter Jingoism JINSA Joe Lieberman Joe Rogan John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John F. Kennedy John Hagee John Kirby John Kiriakou John McCain John McLaughlin John Mearsheimer Joker Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Greenblatt Jonathan Pollard Jordan Peterson Joseph McCarthy Josh Gottheimer Josh Paul Journalism Judaism Judea Judge George Daniels Judicial System Julian Assange Jussie Smollett Justice Justin Trudeau Kaboom Kahanists Kaiser Wilhelm Kamala Harris Kamala On Her Knees Kanye West Karabakh War 2020 Karen Kwiatkowski Karine Jean-Pierre Kash Patel Kashmir Kata'ib Hezbollah Kay Bailey Hutchison Kazakhstan Keir Starmer Kenneth Marcus Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Williamson Khazars Kids Kim Jong Un Kinship Kkk KKKrazy Glue Of The Coalition Of The Fringes Knesset Kompromat Korea Korean War Kosovo Kris Kobach Kristi Noem Ku Klux Klan Kubrick Kurds Kushner Foundation Kyle Rittenhouse Kyrie Irving Language Laos Larry C. Johnson Late Obama Age Collapse Latin America Latinos Laura Loomer Law Lawfare LDNR Lead Poisoning Leahy Amendments Leahy Law Lebanon Lee Kuan Yew Leftism Lenin Leo Frank Leo Strauss Let's Talk About My Hair LGBT LGBTI Liberal Opposition Liberal Whites Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libya Lindsey Graham Linguistics Literacy Literature Lithuania Litvinenko Living Standards Liz Cheney Liz Truss Lloyd Austin Localism long-range-missile-defense Longevity Looting Lord Of The Rings Lorde Los Angeles Loudoun County Louis Farrakhan Love And Marriage Low-fat Lukashenko Lula Lyndon B Johnson Lyndon Johnson Madeleine Albright Mafia MAGA Magnitsky Act Malaysia Malaysian Airlines MH17 Manosphere Manufacturing Mao Zedong Map Marco Rubio Maria Butina Marijuana Marine Le Pen Marjorie Taylor Greene Mark Milley Mark Steyn Mark Warner Marriage Martin Luther King Martin Scorsese Marvel Marx Marxism Masculinity Mass Shootings Mate Choice Mathematics Matt Gaetz Max Boot Max Weber Maxine Waters Mayans McCain McCain/POW McDonald's Meat Media Media Bias Medicine Medieval Christianity Medieval Russia Mediterranean Diet Medvedev Megan McCain Meghan Markle Mein Obama MEK Mel Gibson Men With Gold Chains Meng Wanzhou Mental Health Mental Illness Mental Traits Meritocracy Merkel Merkel Youth Merkel's Boner Merrick Garland Mexico MH 17 MI-6 Michael Bloomberg Michael Collins PIper Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Michael Jackson Michael Lind Michael McFaul Michael Moore Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michelle Goldberg Michelle Ma Belle Michelle Obama Microaggressions Middle Ages Middle East Migration Mike Huckabee Mike Johnson Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mike Waltz Mikhael Gorbachev Miles Mathis Militarized Police Military Military Analysis Military Budget Military History Military Spending Military Technology Millennials Milner Group Minimum Wage Minneapolis Minorities Minsk Accords Miriam Adelson Miscegenation Miscellaneous Misdreavus Mishima Missile Defense Mitch McConnell Mitt Romney Mixed-Race MK-Ultra Mohammed Bin Salman Monarchy Mondoweiss Money Mongolia Mongols Monkeypox Monogamy Moon Landing Hoax Moon Landings Moore's Law Morality Mormonism Mormons Mortality Mortgage Moscow Mossad Movies Muhammad Multiculturalism Music Muslim Ban Muslims Mussolini NAEP Naftali Bennett Nakba NAMs Nancy Pelos Nancy Pelosi Narendra Modi NASA Nation Of Hate Nation Of Islam National Assessment Of Educational Progress National Debt National Endowment For Democracy National Review National Security Strategy National Socialism National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans Natural Gas Nature Vs. Nurture Navalny Affair Navy Standards Nazis Nazism Neandertals Neanderthals Near Abroad Negrolatry Nehru Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolibs Neolithic Neoreaction Nesta Webster Netherlands Never Again Education Act New Cold War New Dark Age New Horizon Foundation New Silk Road New Tes New World Order New York New York City New York Times New Zealand New Zealand Shooting NFL Nicholas II Nicholas Wade Nick Eberstadt Nick Fuentes Nicolas Maduro Niger Nigeria Nike Nikki Haley NIMBY Nina Jankowicz No Fly Zone Noam Chomsky Nobel Prize Nord Stream Nord Stream Pipelines Nordics Norman Braman Norman Finkelstein North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway Novorossiya NSA NSO Group Nuclear Power Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Nuremberg Nutrition NYPD Obama Obama Presidency Obamacare Obesity Obituary Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Wall Street October Surprise Oedipus Complex OFAC Oil Oil Industry Olav Scholz Old Testament Oliver Stone Olympics Open Borders OpenThread Opinion Poll Opioids Orban Organized Crime Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Orwell Osama Bin Laden OTFI Ottoman Empire Our Soldiers Speak Out Of Africa Model Paganism Pakistan Pakistani Palestine Palestinians Palin Pam Bondi Panhandling Papacy Paper Review Parasite Burden Parenting Parenting Paris Attacks Partly Inbred Extended Family Pat Buchanan Pathogens Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Findley Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Durov Pavel Grudinin Paypal Peak Oil Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Pentagon Personal Genomics Personality Pete Buttgieg Pete Hegseth Peter Frost Peter Thiel Peter Turchin Petro Poroshenko Pew Phil Rushton Philadelphia Philippines Philosophy Phoenicians Phyllis Randall Physiognomy Piers Morgan Pigmentation Pigs Piracy PISA Pizzagate POC Ascendancy Podcast Poetry Poland Police Police State Polio Political Correctness Makes You Stupid Political Dissolution Political Economy Politicians Politics Polling Pollution Polygamy Polygyny Pope Francis Population Population Genetics Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Porn Pornography Portland Portugal Portuguese Post-Apocalypse Poverty Power Pramila Jayapal PRC Prediction Prescription Drugs President Joe Biden Presidential Race '08 Presidential Race '12 Presidential Race '16 Presidential Race '20 Prince Andrew Prince Harry Princeton University Priti Patel Privacy Privatization Progressives Propaganda Prostitution protest Protestantism Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion Proud Boys Psychology Psychometrics Psychopathy Public Health Public Schools Puerto Rico Puritans Putin Putin Derangement Syndrome QAnon Qassem Soleimani Qatar Quantitative Genetics Quebec Quiet Skies Quincy Institute R2P Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race/IQ Race Riots Rachel Corrie Racial Purism Racial Reality Racialism Racism Rafah Raj Shah Rand Paul Randy Fine Rap Music Rape Rashida Tlaib Rationality Ray McGovern Raymond Chandler Razib Khan Real Estate RealWorld Recep Tayyip Erdogan Red Sea Refugee Crisis #refugeeswelcome Religion Religion And Philosophy Rentier Reparations Reprint Republican Party Republicans Review Revisionism Rex Tillerson RFK Assassination Ricci Richard Dawkins Richard Goldberg Richard Grenell Richard Haas Richard Haass Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Rightwing Cinema Riots R/k Theory RMAX Robert A. Heinlein Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Ford Robert Kagan Robert Kraft Robert Maxwell Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert O'Brien Robert Reich Robots Rock Music Roe Vs. Wade Roger Waters Rolling Stone Roman Empire Romania Romanticism Rome Ron DeSantis Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rotherham Rothschilds RT International Rudy Giuliani Rush Limbaugh Russiagate Russian Demography Russian Elections 2018 Russian History Russian Media Russian Military Russian Nationalism Russian Occupation Government Russian Orthodox Church Russian Reaction Russians Russophobes Russophobia Russotriumph Ruth Bader Ginsburg Rwanda Ryan Dawson Sabrina Rubin Erdely Sacha Baron Cohen Sacklers Sailer Strategy Sailer's First Law Of Female Journalism Saint Peter Tear Down This Gate! Saint-Petersburg Salman Rushie Salt Sam Altman Sam Bankman-Fried Sam Francis Samantha Power Samson Option San Bernadino Massacre Sandy Hook Sapir-Whorf SAT Satanic Age Satanism Saudi Arabia Scandal Science Denialism Science Fiction Scooter Libby Scotland Scott Ritter Scrabble Sean Hannity Seattle Secession Self Determination Self Indulgence Semites Serbia Sergei Lavrov Sergei Skripal Sergey Glazyev Seth Rich Sex Sex Differences Sexism Sexual Harassment Sexual Selection Sexuality Seymour Hersh Shai Masot Shakespeare Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shireen Abu Akleh Shmuley Boteach Shoah Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shulamit Aloni Shurat HaDin Sigal Mandelker Sigar Pearl Mandelker Sigmund Freud Silicon Valley Singapore Single Men Single Women Sinotriumph Six Day War Sixties SJWs Skin Color Slavery Slavery Reparations Slavoj Zizek Slavs Smart Fraction Social Justice Warriors Social Media Social Science Socialism Society Sociobiology Sociology Sodium Solzhenitsyn Somalia Sotomayor South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea Southeast Asia Soviet History Soviet Union Sovok Space Space Exploration Space Program Spain Spanish Spanish River High School SPLC Sport Sports Srebrenica St Petersburg International Economic Forum Stabby Somali Staffan Stage Stalinism Standardized Tests Star Trek Star Wars Starbucks Starvation Comparisons State Department Statistics Statue Of Liberty Steny Hoyer Stephen Cohen Stephen Harper Stephen Jay Gould Stereotypes Steroids Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steve Witkoff Steven Pinker Strait Of Hormuz Strategic Ambiguity Stuart Levey Stuart Seldowitz Student Debt Stuff White People Like Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subhas Chandra Bose Subprime Mortgage Crisis Suburb Suella Braverman Sugar Suicide Superintelligence Supreme Court Surveillance Susan Glasser Svidomy Sweden Switzerland Symington Amendment Syria Syrian Civil War Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Take Action Taliban Talmud Tariff Tatars Taxation Taxes Tea Party Technical Considerations Technology Ted Cruz Telegram Television Terrorism Terrorists Terry McAuliffe Tesla Testing Testosterone Tests Texas THAAD Thailand The AK The American Conservative The Bell Curve The Bible The Black Autumn The Cathedral The Confederacy The Constitution The Eight Banditos The Family The Free World The Great Awokening The Left The Middle East The New York Times The South The States The Zeroth Amendment To The Constitution Theranos Theresa May Third World Thomas Jefferson Thomas Massie Thomas Moorer Thought Crimes Tiananmen Massacre Tibet Tiger Mom TikTok TIMSS Tom Cotton Tom Massie Tom Wolfe Tony Blair Tony Blinken Tony Kleinfeld Too Many White People Torture Trade Trains Trans Fat Trans Fats Transgender Transgenderism Transhumanism Translation Translations Transportation Travel Trayvon Martin Trolling True Redneck Stereotypes Trump Trump Derangement Syndrome Trust Tsarist Russia Tucker Carlson Tulsa Tulsi Gabbard Turkey Turks TWA 800 Twins Twitter Ucla UFOs UK Ukrainian Crisis UN Security Council Unbearable Whiteness Unemployment Unions United Kingdom United Nations United Nations General Assembly United Nations Security Council United States Universal Basic Income UNRWA Urbanization Ursula Von Der Leyen Uruguay US Blacks US Capitol Storming 2021 US Civil War II US Constitution US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 US Regionalism USA USAID USS Liberty USSR Uyghurs Uzbekistan Vaccination Vaccines Valdimir Putin Valerie Plame Vdare Venezuela Vibrancy Victoria Nuland Victorian England Video Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Vikings Viktor Orban Viktor Yanukovych Violence Vioxx Virginia Virginia Israel Advisory Board Vitamin D Vivek Ramaswamy Vladimir Zelensky Volodymur Zelenskyy Volodymyr Zelensky Vote Fraud Voter Fraud Voting Rights Voting Rights Act Vulcan Society Waffen SS Wall Street Walmart Wang Ching Wei Wang Jingwei War War Crimes War Guilt War In Donbass War On Christmas War On Terror War Powers War Powers Act Warhammer Washington DC WASPs Watergate Wealth Wealth Inequality Wealthy Web Traffic Weight WEIRDO Welfare Wendy Sherman West Bank Western Decline Western European Marriage Pattern Western Hypocrisy Western Media Western Religion Western Revival Westerns White America White Americans White Death White Flight White Guilt White Helmets White Liberals White Man's Burden White Nakba White Nationalism White Nationalists White People White Privilege White Slavery White Supremacy White Teachers Whiterpeople Whites Who Whom Whoopi Goldberg Wikileaks Wikipedia Wildfires William Browder William F. Buckley William Kristol William Latson William McGonagle William McRaven WINEP Winston Churchill Woke Capital Women Woodrow Wilson Workers Working Class World Bank World Economic Forum World Health Organization World Population World Values Survey World War G World War H World War Hair World War I World War III World War R World War T World War Weed WTF WVS WWII Xi Jinping Xinjiang Yahya Sinwar Yair Lapid Yemen Yevgeny Prigozhin Yoav Gallant Yogi Berra's Restaurant Yoram Hazony YouTube Yugoslavia Yuval Noah Harari Zbigniew Brzezinski Zimbabwe Zionism Zionists Zvika Fogel
Nothing found
All Commenters •ï¿½My
Comments
•ï¿½Followed
Commenters
�⇅All / On "Nazi Germany"
    I am a huge Bonapartist. I support the Napoleonic code, the establishment of a pan-European Empire under French leadership, and the destruction of the Holy Roman Empire and the reorganization of the German States as the Confederation of the Rhine. Napoleon himself, however, I abhor. While he led from the front, repeatedly risking his life...
  • @Piffle
    Insisting that people HAVE TO defend the guy who lost against the Jews almost 100 years ago now is exactly why national socialist lose and why they unwittingly fall directly into the Jewish framework. To worship a "hero" who lost sounds exactly like people who will be eating goy slop forever.

    Replies: @Trinity, @Alexandros

    Lost? You’re not even in the game. No political actor since Hitler has been. Just a bunch of mediocrities blowing hot air into nothingness.

    Hitler was a great man. You do not deserve him.

  • @nokangaroos
    Very clear-eyed article, even for this here site, thanks.

    "Firing the first shot" is a Manichean/Puritan/Jewish pseudomoralist obsession;
    the lengths of provocation to which the Jewmerican is willing to go all while
    claiming to be innocent as the driven snow are something to behold;
    if the Orange One wants peace all he has to do is stop murdering Russian
    civilians (fat chance).
    WWII was inevitable by 1928, long before the coalition government of the
    National Uprising took power, and everybody could see it (a direct result of the
    (((bankers))) running amok was of course the Great Depression, and the Orange
    Man´s tariffs will beget the same).
    - Napoleon, who gave a little thought to these things, used to argue it is the defender
    who starts the war (= necessary consent is given by his refusal to surrender) which
    is mostly but not quite congruent with the USraeli definition.
    - Clausewitz declared ex cathedra the war is started by the one who makes it inevitable;
    insofar as this is not circular it strikes me as the best definition - of course it
    turns most of "history" on its head ðŸ˜

    Replies: @Franz, @Thomasina

    “…the Orange Man´s tariffs will beget the same.”

    Paul Craig Roberts had a good article on free trade and tariffs:

    https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2025/03/12/free-trade-was-ricardos-concocted-theory-used-to-dispossess-the-british-aristocracy/

    Maybe if the bankers and the Federal Reserve hadn’t engineered the Roaring Twenties and the financial looting and rigging they’ve done since 1987, resulting in enormous bubbles which the bankers fed off of, offshoring manufacturing, destruction of the country, etc., none of this would be necessary.

    “When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men in a society, over the course of time they create for themselves a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it.” Frederic Bastiat

  • @Poupon Marx
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    I am going to bed tonight and cry in my pillow because we do not and never will have the quality of leadership on the level of the current candidates of the AfD. What excellence, quality, and ability!!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kz2gv0m4mCM

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wO0A0XcWy88

    Replies: @nokangaroos

    Neue Slowenische Kunst, to help you sleep better ðŸ˜


    Video Link

  • anon[517] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:
    @Half Norwegian
    @anon

    Kennedy was a massive jewlover and posed zero threat to their money power. Sickening how many of you alt media retards craft these elaborate fanfics worshipping that scumbag.

    Replies: @anon

    Half norwegian? I wonder what the other half is. I never said I was a fan of Kennedy, only pointing out the fact that he joined others who had the temerity to print money. As for the alt media claim, are you saying you trust the msm more? Kennedy was a jew lover? Have you met his father? The jews hated Kennedys guts, you retard. From now on when you use the term retard maybe you should look in the mirror.

  • @Obersturmbannführer

    I don’t know who Mr. Parker is. Nobody does. For all I know, he could be a Jew. If so, I find his article encouraging. It means that the Jews feel their power threatened by National Socialism, so much so, that they have resorted to posing as National Socialists to undermine our morale and solidarity.
    �
    Several of my comments in Parker's thread at UR were blocked. I believe it was Parker, not Ron Unz, who blocked them. My last blocked comment was a thorough debunk of his exaggerations and lies about Dirlewanger. If anyone else had comments blocked on Parker's thread, I would be interested to know.

    I think that Parker is some kind of limited hangout or, as Cass Sunstein told us, an agent of "nudge". He is trying to "nudge" the alt-right away from discussions about Jewish depravity and sadism, and towards discussions about the foibles and shortcomings of the NSDAP, Germany and Germans in general.

    Replies: @Hinz, @Poupon Marx, @Obersturmbannführer

    Since Mr. Conte allowed my comment on this thread concerning my comments being blocked by Richard Parker, I will take the liberty of recreating a comment on this thread. It concerned Parkers description of Dirlewanger:

    “SS units of the Dirlewanger brigade sort—and generally not of bona fide combat units such as SS LAH, Das Reich—and other rogue elements went on killing sprees of any German even suspected of desertion, whether military or civilian. This was not done with any hope of changing the outcome of the war, but to buy Hitler and his top entourage a few more days to live before having to do the inevitable. Far more appalling was the Nero Decree given to Albert Speer, which quite thankfully Speer never considered carrying out. Had he done as ordered, this Nero Decree would have done far more than merely decimate the German population.”

    Dirlewanger was a highly decorated veteran in an army with requirements of Prussian levels of honor and merit, who has been smeared for decades by sadistic and murderous Jews and Communists.

    I then commented about the obligatory adhominems and histrionics (kvetching and squealing) whenever anyone mentions Dirlewanger was reminiscent, in a pattern matching sort of way, to how the media treats Prigozhin and the Wagner group. See this Dailymail article for reference:

    Revelling in rape, torture and brutal executions: How Putin’s Wagner mercenaries’ terrifying brutality echoes another group of criminals-turned-soldiers… Hitler’s reviled Dirlewanger brigade

    But ironically, the methods employed by Wagner mercs bare a stark resemblance to those of the Dirlewanger brigade – a notorious division of the Nazis’ SS paramilitary organisation who raped, murdered and pillaged their way through Europe as they executed Adolf Hitler’s dark designs.

    I pointed out how Mengele is also a favorite “worst person” strawman to be held up and beaten by authors like Parker.

    I then linked to an interview of a Dirlewanger Brigade veteran named Karl:

    Waffen-SS Sturmbrigade Dirlewanger

    Karl makes the following statement directly contradicting Parker:

    “I remember a recruit went AWOL, and he could have had him shot, but instead he only ordered extra watch duty. He was very humane and kind to us.”

    The entire interview is quite interesting, I am putting his description/explanation of Warsaw below the more:

    [MORE]

    Okay, fair enough, can I ask you what happened in Warsaw during the uprising at least?

    Karl: I will talk about Warsaw, I was there, and then I will never speak of it again. In 1944, when the Allies invaded France, the Soviets launched massive attacks against the thin German front. We were now used as front line combat troops, but we were vastly outnumbered and took heavy losses. The Soviets used massive artillery attacks to break our lines. We steadily retreated back to the outskirts of Warsaw. Reports were coming that Soviet agents had been active in organizing the civilians to rise up and fight, telling them liberation was at hand. Several of our patrols had been ambushed and killed by them.

    We started seeing this during the retreat, they knew we were losing, so many civilians, not wanting to be seen as collaborators, started fighting against us in hopes of being forgiven. They would ambush ambulances, trains, and buses. A bus full of retreating Helferinnen [female auxiliaries] was attacked and the girls were raped and shot. I saw this personally outside Warsaw in Zakret, 10 young women and their two soldier escorts. All shot in the head and many of the girls had their pants down and some were bloody in their vaginas. Our leader took pictures to document this cruel act. Jewish bandits were known to be active in the area.

    The ROA [Russian volunteers on the German side] units, who were on our flank, captured some fighters and our officers asked they be brought to us. When they arrived we could tell many looked jewish. Our leaders asked them if they did this, and upon using slight force like bending arms and fingers, they admitted they were part of a large civilian army, put together with help from the Soviets to fight us. ‘Yes, they attacked the bus’ our interpreter called out. There were fifty or so of them, the leader of the ROA and our leaders conferred, then it was announced that according to military law in the region, they were sentenced to death, and our units and the ROA shot them after tying them up. A few tried to run before justice was served, but they failed.

    We noticed battle sounds inside Warsaw, and we were ordered to gather around, von dem Bach [Erich Julius Eberhard von dem Bach-Zelewski (March 1, 1899 – March 8, 1972). von dem Bach was an influential and high ranking SS figure.], Dirlewanger, and other high officers met. They then addressed us all. They said the Allies had raised and armed some civilians in the city who were now fighting us and have committed acts of terror. They were to be treated as bandits, but I want to stress that they told everyone we need to show mercy when it was asked for.

    We learned that a year earlier, while removing jews from the ghetto, due to the crime and active spying they engaged in, they put up a hell of a fight. They murdered several soldiers and civilians and had been given weapons by the Soviets. The SS had to bring in many combat units to quell them, finally breaking them and sending them to camps to be watched. The Soviets even bombed the ghetto, killing hundreds, for no known reason. They did the SS units a favor as they broke their will to fight after this.

    Now the Polish civilians were the next target of the Allies, they told them if they helped fight us, they would gain freedom, and we were on the verge of defeat. So they rose up, attacking civilians working for us, and single soldiers. They built vast networks of bunkers and tunnels to conduct hit and run raids. They took over the jewish ghetto and the western part of the city. This is what we came into. The army had managed to bring in units to contain the fighters, but any attacks had been repulsed with heavy losses.

    Luckily we were experienced in this type of fighting. As soon as our trucks dropped us off we came under sniper fire and we had our first dead. Dirlewanger was so angry he phoned demanding tank and air support. A flak truck came up and tore into the area we thought the shots came from. It was ordered the whole building be leveled, and artillery did its job.

    They scrambled out like crazy people, firing at us, and we cut them all down. The artillery wreaked havoc on their hideouts. This went on for hours; some stumbled out of nowhere to surrender and were interrogated for information then sent to the rear. There had to be hundreds dead, men, women and children. We were furious these people were that stupid to think they could stand against us, and with their children in tow. How cruel could a parent be to put their children in harm’s way? Knowing we would shoot back. Friendly Poles came to help us and pinpoint the areas of resistance.

    In one area, we came upon a cellar where German soldiers had been tortured, there was blood everywhere, their teeth were knocked out and fingers cut off. After seeing this, it was announced no more prisoners would be taken, but von dem Bach countermanded this order. Some men, especially the foreign volunteers, ignored it, and shot anyone they caught, due to the level of cruelty these civilians displayed.

    We were several days in and the western city was ablaze. Stukas attacked, heavy artillery was used, and we now had flamethrowers to hit these devils where bullets could not touch them. We even had loud speakers going around, asking that they at least let their children go, so they would not be hurt. Some complied, and more surrendered. First aid was set up to deal with their wounded. One fighter surrendered and then threw a grenade at a resting platoon; his whole group was accidentally raked by fire killing four. This was a sad mistake, but our nerves were shot by the level of barbarity these civilians were capable of. That is the power of propaganda.

    I remember an army general came to tour the damage and upon seeing the dead that still had not been buried asked if all this destruction was necessary. Dirlewanger and others took him on a tour showing how they would fight to the end, so it was hard taking them prisoner. They held onto the faith that we were done for, and any moment the victorious Allies would roll in to save them.

    The Soviets even hampered them by shelling the city, but hit areas where they were defending. Doing us a favor yet again and destroying large areas of hideouts. I was in Warsaw for 2 months, and can say we fought hard and well, but with honor. When the Poles did surrender we took them prisoner, we even took a few British and Soviet soldiers with them. They had been sent in by the Allies to help train and organize.

    By October they were finished. They asked for terms and our leaders gave them very generous ones. Everyone would surrender their arms, any criminals would be turned over and the rest can go back home. It was insane, but we had no capacity to handle them. Our food was short so it just made sense to let them go on their own. I could tell they were surprised, many thought we would shoot them all. Many of them lined up to say they were sorry to us, but the tens of thousands who died needlessly were manifested in our faces.

    •ï¿½Thanks: nokangaroos
  • @anon
    It's not about Hitler. It's about the National Socialist SYSTEM. The psychological conditioning against Hitler has been intense, and is actually a distraction. What was it about National Socialism that took Germany from a bankrupt Wiemar Republic into the economic miracle? It wasn't just one guy. It was a massive team effort by the entire German people. How many great geniuses did Hitler have behind him? Thousands.
    The jew rub is getting Americans to think in individualistic terms...not group terms. They want you to think about the great man as opposed to the great group. Jews have their power from group strength, not one guy.
    Focus on saving the Europeans, removing the minorities (social terrorists), but most importantly reviving the economy.
    1-Connect the currency to units of labor (like NS)
    2-Federalize the Federal Reserve Bank (like NS)
    3-Federalize all the corporations (like NS)
    4-Erase all debts, state and personal (like NS)

    We could go on all day here, but you get the point. The focus on Hitler is a mistake and feeds into jew conditioning.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Thomasina

    “The jew rub is getting Americans to think in individualistic terms…not group terms. They want you to think about the great man as opposed to the great group. Jews have their power from group strength, not one guy.”

    Very true. The article posted on Unz the other day by Ricardo Duchesne titled “White Europeans responsible for almost all of the greatest human achievements” really brought out the jewish fear, anger and envy. “How dare you try to form a ‘group’. How dare you try to stand out! What you’re doing is bragging. You didn’t do that; God did.” And on and on.

    You are correct, there is power in group strength. This is what they are afraid of. This is why they are trying to erase our history, our culture (“You don’t have a culture”), our traditions, and it’s why they elevate all other groups, comically so, and why they’re flooding the West with foreigners in order to dilute the group.

    If they have to, they will instigate a civil war. And it won’t be “White Europeans want their own country.” It will be the “racist Whites against all others”.

    Up until this time Whites never saw the need to pound their chests or form a strong, cohesive group, and the jews are doing everything in their power to make sure that group is never able to form.

    Groups need an enemy. The enemy is now being seen by millions. It is good to have empathy for others, to be kind and benevolent, but your first priority must always be to show empathy for yourself, for the group.

  • @Makow reader
    The Untold Stories of Hitler's 'Children'

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-7GHak6GbU&t=175s

    Dive into the chilling untold stories of Hitler's 'children'-two girls whose lives intertwined with the heart of the Nazi regime. Discover the shocking tale of Bernile Nienau, the Jewish girl affectionately called "the Führer's child," and Edda Göring, the pampered daughter of Hermann Göring, whose title as "The Princess of the Third Reich" masked a world of terror. 

    Uncover how both girls became symbols of a propaganda machine that exploited innocence while hiding the regime's dark truths. Their stories reveal the stark contrasts of childhood amidst war, innocence alongside complicity, and the tragic consequences of ideology. 

    Replies: @Cloverleaf

    Du dreckiges schwein.

  • anonymous[183] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:

    To worship a “hero†who lost sounds exactly like people who will be eating goy slop forever.

    -Piffle

    Jesus Christ was also a “hero” who “lost”. Really makes you think…

  • To the shock and dismay of those of a more mainstream, conservative persuasion, many different voices in dissident right, far right, and populist right circles have expressed adulation, admiration, and approval for Adolf Hitler, seemingly without qualification or reservation.[1] Particularly in “Culture as Programming,†I have expressed sympathy for and agreement with much of the...
  • @Priss Factor
    @Observator

    1. Had Hitler not invaded the USSR, Germany would have dominated all of Europe minus Russia and a few neighboring states.

    2. Had Hitler invaded the USSR as a liberating force than as an enslaving/exterminating power, he might received widespread support from anti-communist elements. He might have won or fought to a stalemate.

    He invaded... and he did it the wrong way.

    Replies: @SouthFren, @Curmudgeon, @Dimitrie, @brostoevsky, @Quinn, @ReinhardSiegfriedson

    1. Had Hitler not invaded the USSR, Germany would have dominated all of Europe minus Russia and a few neighboring states.

    Hitler had no intention of “dominating” Europe.

    2. Had Hitler invaded the USSR as a liberating force than as an enslaving/exterminating power, he might received widespread support from anti-communist elements. He might have won or fought to a stalemate.

    What is the evidence that Operation Barbarossa was executed in an “enslaving” and/or “exterminating” manner? Be specific please.

  • I am a huge Bonapartist. I support the Napoleonic code, the establishment of a pan-European Empire under French leadership, and the destruction of the Holy Roman Empire and the reorganization of the German States as the Confederation of the Rhine. Napoleon himself, however, I abhor. While he led from the front, repeatedly risking his life...
  • Anonymous[491] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:
    @anon
    It's not about Hitler. It's about the National Socialist SYSTEM. The psychological conditioning against Hitler has been intense, and is actually a distraction. What was it about National Socialism that took Germany from a bankrupt Wiemar Republic into the economic miracle? It wasn't just one guy. It was a massive team effort by the entire German people. How many great geniuses did Hitler have behind him? Thousands.
    The jew rub is getting Americans to think in individualistic terms...not group terms. They want you to think about the great man as opposed to the great group. Jews have their power from group strength, not one guy.
    Focus on saving the Europeans, removing the minorities (social terrorists), but most importantly reviving the economy.
    1-Connect the currency to units of labor (like NS)
    2-Federalize the Federal Reserve Bank (like NS)
    3-Federalize all the corporations (like NS)
    4-Erase all debts, state and personal (like NS)

    We could go on all day here, but you get the point. The focus on Hitler is a mistake and feeds into jew conditioning.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Thomasina

    Exactly right – the National Socialist System did wonders for Germany. I remember was a schoolboy, and a coin collector, that I had a lot of Nongeld Notes – paper money from the Weinmar Period (pre Hitler) when Germany was a bankrupt country – notes in the million or billion mark notes and worthless – and then real silver coinage under Hitler.: Ex. 5 Mark. Why didn’t American bring in Hitler’s bankers rather than his misille scientists? We would have been better off.

  • Trinity says:

    Just thought of what I would call a tragic figure, Ira Hayes, the celebrated Native American “war hero.†Truth is truth, and like bad medicine it is sometimes hard to swallow. How in the hell as a Native American could you fight in WWII. I wonder how many German Americans fought against their own in both World Wars for the benefit of (((others.)))

  • @Franklin Ryckaert
    @The Last Adam

    You don't need a Hitler to avoid mass non-white immigration into your country. Ask the Hungarians about Viktor Orban. (Or ask the German party of AfD).

    Replies: @Poupon Marx

    I am going to bed tonight and cry in my pillow because we do not and never will have the quality of leadership on the level of the current candidates of the AfD. What excellence, quality, and ability!!

    Video Link


    Video Link

    •ï¿½Replies: @nokangaroos
    @Poupon Marx

    Neue Slowenische Kunst, to help you sleep better ðŸ˜

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZAD7W3M4zc
  • The most wonderful thing Hitler did was to commit suicide. He just didn’t do it soon enough.

  • Trinity says:
    @Piffle
    Insisting that people HAVE TO defend the guy who lost against the Jews almost 100 years ago now is exactly why national socialist lose and why they unwittingly fall directly into the Jewish framework. To worship a "hero" who lost sounds exactly like people who will be eating goy slop forever.

    Replies: @Trinity, @Alexandros

    Explain to me the mindset of Whites who slaughtered other Whites who were defending themselves from World Kikery. Better to be a loser than a sellout, race traitor or a slave. Nothing worse than a traitor, they receive no respect even from the people who use them as crash dummies. No statues of Benedict Arnold in England. Lol. I don’t get it with my fellow Whites, they will fight like tigers against other Whites for the benefit of some non white racist or kikes set on destroying them in the end. Unbelievable.IF I had been a German American at the time, no way in hell I am going to be drafted to serve in the armed forces.

  • Conte is great and his podcast Prussian Socialism is by far the best history podcast right now.

  • ANON[806] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:

    Franklin Ryckaert:
    “Actually the fact that that hoax by Polish nationalists could last for 15 years, shows that Jews don’t control Wikipedia completely.”

    Haha, Okay.

    A Jew exerts influence over Wikipedia in order to advance specifically Jewish interests (influence which, apparently, nobody else could exert, not even the Germans who were the actually victims of the fifteen-year blood libel) but this fact proves, in Franklin’s tortured reasoning, that the Jews *don’t* have power (whereas, to any reasonable person, it would demonstrate that they *do* have power.)

    Franklin, why do you engage in such contortions to try to fit everything into the cognitive prison cell of your pre-existing mental model – of the mental model that you (and, to be fair, everyone), has been programmed with by Jewish film, Jewish media and Jewish historiography?

    Doesn’t your tendentious argumentation here demonstrate to you how warped and twisted your thinking is? Have you zero self-awareness? Please, try to break free of the mental Matrix the Jews have put you in.

    Again, what does this “fifteen year” Wikipedia hoax of Nazi villainy (the longest in Wikipedia’s history) tell you?

    That Jews are not all-powerful because they let something go on for fifteen years for which they were marginally negatively affected? Sure, maybe you’re right that Jews aren’t all-powerful; perhaps you have a point there. (Or, perhaps Jews just didn’t much bother with this narrative transgression, perhaps calculating that it hurt the Germans more than it hurt Jews or helped Poles, and they found that kind of useful, or, at least, amusing.)

    But, more to my point, what does it tell you about Wikipedia as a source?

    Personally, it makes me wonder what other “fifteen year” (plus) long hoaxes are running uncorrected on Wikipedia right now and not for lack of counter-evidence but for lack of someone with the correct political credentials showing up to contest them. (I.e., the political precedence which an aggrieved anti-German Jew takes over an aggrieved anti-German Pole – two “victims” who, like hyenas, are fighting over the carcass of victimhood Pokemon points of being Germany’s most persecuted victims.)


    It, furthermore, makes me wonder whether the quotations you provided testifying to Nazi villainy against Eastern Europeans are reliable representations of fact, or are just artifacts of another “fifteen year hoax” which is not yet corrected because some Jew hasn’t (yet) found it politically expedient to contest it.[1]

    That’s what it would make any reasonable person wonder.

    More generally, the fact that such a long-running hoax could occur is emblematic of the systemic bias which exists, not only on Wikipedia, but in society at large. Could you imagine a Wikipedia page blood-libeling Jews for murdering 200,000 Poles surviving for fifteen years? No. Why? We all know why. Everything you think you know about the world [certainly WWII] is systemically biased because you-know-who controls the media.

    Why, then, knowing these facts, would any reasonable person by default back to believing what Wikipedia (or any mainstream or Jewish reference) as a source about Nazi villainy, of all things? It’s like Gell-Mann Amnesia, perhaps. You know the Jewish media is lying to you about everything today – but then you forget all these lies and just assume that they’re telling the truth about WWII.

    [1] The hoax in question being, again, the “Nazi death camp” with 200,000 Polish victims which didn’t exist.
    https://ia801404.us.archive.org/8/items/haaretz-the-fake-nazi-death-camp-wikipedias-longest-hoax-exposed/Haaretz_The_Fake_Nazi_Death_Camp_Wikipedia%E2%80%99s_Longest_Hoax%2C_Exposed.pdf

  • To the shock and dismay of those of a more mainstream, conservative persuasion, many different voices in dissident right, far right, and populist right circles have expressed adulation, admiration, and approval for Adolf Hitler, seemingly without qualification or reservation.[1] Particularly in “Culture as Programming,†I have expressed sympathy for and agreement with much of the...
  • @Poupon Marx
    @Tiptoethrutulips


    Are there any writings that can’t be classified as observations from human beings?
    �
    Of course there are, you dolt. Using a general query outside and without reference to the quotes under discussion is a weak logical fallacy and diversion; which is your forte these days, Miss Bo Peep.

    The rest of your comment consists of intellectually lazy and meaningless questions. Ask a more profound one, for example: "How much is that doggy in the window. The one with the waggety tail?"

    Replies: @Tiptoethrutulips

    Of course there are, you dolt.

    Such as?

    without reference to the quotes under discussion

    Which quotes are those to which you are referring? The one about your first escapee and a scary bear? Or, this one – Germany’s loss of WW2 has left the world in quite a state today – ?

    On the state of the world today, as Nathan/SnorkelGuy said, [Post WW2] “Immigration laws changed within ten years…reformed or restructured to such a degree that they basically abandoned all of the racial make-up of the native people of their places, and this didn’t matter if you were the winner or the loser of that horrible war against the “horrible Nazis.†Whichever side of that war you were on, your future was, your native population would eventually be replaced in numbers; by the birth rate or the names of the people coming in being foreign; or in your school system, the native population being demonized as especially bad, especially needing change….â€

    The utter falsehood known as the Holocaust/Shoah, which is now used as the justification for the entire war against Germany, mostly, and is the utmost indictment/denunciation against the character of Adolf Hitler, is the relevant issue about/on which I diverted.

    I visited Spain under Franco in the 70s. Beautiful and prosperous. Same with Brazil under the Generals.

    Unlike Germany under Hitler before the western world descended upon the Germans in a way not done to the others?

    Meine Kröte, the problem is this – YOU are one of those foreigners who prospers within the nations of your classic enemies – Whites, Saxons, Germanics…whatever you want to call us, and that’s why you can not/will not admit that Hitler was a hero/defender of Germany/Europa. He was your classic enemy; same as that of Barbara Spectre, et al.

    I was in San Antonio recently; what happened to all the White Peoples? Barbara Roche would happily put down her desert fork to admire the dark splendor…

    For my dreams, I hold my life
    For wishes, I behold my night
    The truth at the end of time
    Losing faith makes a crime

  • I am a huge Bonapartist. I support the Napoleonic code, the establishment of a pan-European Empire under French leadership, and the destruction of the Holy Roman Empire and the reorganization of the German States as the Confederation of the Rhine. Napoleon himself, however, I abhor. While he led from the front, repeatedly risking his life...
  • Hitler kaput !!! The Beast is rasing its ugly head again. Germs Must Perish !!! So Be It. Peace at last. ðŸ™

  • @HVMII
    I am not so sure it was Germany v. America as it was Germany v. Britian which was still the world’s dominant imperial power and controlled by the Rothschild- Morgan network. I agree that Jewish world money played a huge role in pushing for the war – just look at Roosevelt’s cabinet, but the USA was still a part of the Anglo-American establishment and not totally under the control of world Jewry. Rockefeller had significant investments in Germany and was more interested in Asia than in Europe. However, owing to his indebtedness to the Focus, Churchill was under the control of world Jewry.

    Remember that US public was very much opposed to the European war when it broke out in 1939 owing to the fact that many Americans saw it as a war for the British Empire. At least 85% of the US public opposed the war right up to late 1941. Moreover, one cannot even trust the lesser numbers presented by Gallop Poll after the start of 1941, because Gallop had been taken over by William Stephenson of the MI-6 through the British Security Coordination.

    It is true, that Germany had Europe’s youngest population and needed agricultural ground to feed itself. Hence, Lebensraum. However, it was not the USA putting up a block to Lebensraum. It was Britain, because British policy has always been to side with the weaker power in Europe, so as to maintain its hegemony over the continent - especially for Halford Mackinder’s Heartland. Many people seem to forget that the vast majority of Central European countries were on board with Germany v. the USSR – not the other way around. One could argue that if Hitler and the National Socialist Party's racial policies had not been so extreme regarding the Slavs - if they found some way of incorporating the Slavs into the greater Reich (not just as feudal serfs or starving them to death) - we would not even be having this discussion in the first place. The fact is that the Germans were reluctant to use the Ukrainian division led by Bandera, because the Germans were concerned that they would have to make some concessions to the Ukrainian nationalists at the end of the war. This racial attitude may have been Germany’s biggest mistake. Why not give the Slavs some economic autonomy to serve the greater Reich in an almost EU fashion as long as they do not compete with the Reich’s industrial base? Besides ridding Germany of Jewish influence (which the Havarra Agreement established with the Lehi Zionists led by Yitzak Shamir), Hitler essentially wanted a greater trade zone which was in nationalist hands – not in the hands of Jewish global finance.

    In regard to military tactics, John Mosier’s Deathride says Hitler was tactically correct. Moreover, in Hoggan’s The Unnecessary War, Hoggan points out that it was the upper classes, especially the upper classes in the newly organized OKW-OKH (OKH was East Front only), that sabotaged Hitler’s program from the start, because they did not want the upstart Nationals Socialists to succeed. When discussing his biography of Rudolf Hess, David Irving stated that Hitler wanted to shelf the National Socialist Party – especially the more rabid Judeophobes within the party. Irving also says that Hitler told Hess that he “wanted the Gaultier’s off his back.â€

    I really do not know how Conte can leave out Hitler’s Hegelian perspective, whereby Hitler juxtaposed the internationalist connections between Capitalism and Judeo-Marxist Bolshevism. This issue was central to Hitler’s National Socialism. And if you read Solzhenitsyn’s 100 Years of Living Together the existence of Jewish Marxist Bolshevism and its support from capitalists is indisputable. Moreover, contrary to much of the self-serving disinformation, Solzhenitsyn clearly shows that the Jews were not purged from the governing organs of the USRR during Stalin’s reign. Where Conte is correct, is in his statement that it is “too difficult to argue for the Truth in the lie-riddled world we live in,†and maybe he does not want to delve into these weeds about the Jewish dialectic.

    In my view Conte’s conclusion that Hitler left the world with a pro-White political outcome is problematic. The west is no longer pro-white. Western governments have turned against the whites for various economic and political reasons much of which can be traced back to the victory of international globalism and to post-war Jewish Cultural Marxism. I think Lindbergh’s assessment is much more correct (similar Viktor Orban’s recent assessment of Ukraine war). The Second World War in Europe was a civil war among - and the destruction of - the European race. I would also argue that Hitler was a gambler and he misjudged several issues such as Britain’s determination to make war (you could say on behalf of Jewish finance – to note Germany’s decision to implement autarky and suspend debt payments in 1933 started the financial war when Germany was labeled a trade violator in 1934), or the vast depth of the USSR and the perceived weakness of the Soviet army due to Stalin’s purges (there is also the Suvorov thesis – was Stalin trying to provoke Hitler – Molotov’s visit to Berlin in late 1940 would say yes), and the fact that FDR would have had a hard time declaring war on Germany had not Hitler declared war on the USA first (was it really necessary to declare war on the USA despite the fact that FDR was clearly drawing the US into Europe’s war like Woodrow Wilson did in the first war?). I suppose these are weeds which Conte is correct in saying that there disinformation/hyperbolic propagandization about the war that it is near impossible to refute every single-issue point-by-point.

    Replies: @John Johnson

    It is true, that Germany had Europe’s youngest population and needed agricultural ground to feed itself. Hence, Lebensraum. However, it was not the USA putting up a block to Lebensraum. It was Britain, because British policy has always been to side with the weaker power in Europe

    It was Chamberlain and the British conservatives that wanted Hitler to attack the USSR.

    Hitler had a dozen different ways of expanding Germany. Britain is not at fault for his mistakes.

    It was the petty trench running corporal that broke the Munich agreement after swearing he was done gobbling up land. He then invaded Poland knowing full well that it could spark a world war.

    Make all the excuses you want but he could have gone East without attacking Poland.

    In fact in his book he wrote that going East was the path for Germany. His generals also originally wanted Germany to push East and not get involved with France or Britain. They were correctly concerned with a repeat of WW1 with island fortress Britain backed by US production. Hitler even wrote that he wouldn’t make the mistake of a two front war.

    The Germans have always been flawed by a combination of arrogance and rigid conformity. Hitler’s original plan was to actually attack France through Belgium which was a copy of WW1. The Ardennes plan only happened because the Belgium plan was accidentally leaked to the Allies. It matched entirely what the Allies expected. Hitler was depicted as a war genius for the Ardennes plan but it was never his idea and was actually a plan B.

    Hitler was not a hero of Europe. He made a deal with the worst Communist to ship Catholic Poles off to camps. He planned on starving millions of Slavs to death. A mass murderer and not a liberator.

  • To the shock and dismay of those of a more mainstream, conservative persuasion, many different voices in dissident right, far right, and populist right circles have expressed adulation, admiration, and approval for Adolf Hitler, seemingly without qualification or reservation.[1] Particularly in “Culture as Programming,†I have expressed sympathy for and agreement with much of the...
  • @Patrick McNally
    @ganainm

    > Stalin knew the Japs were about to stop fighting with the Soviets, and that would free up 2 million Soviet troops,

    Stalin kept 1.1 million troops in the east throughout the entire war.

    https://insidestory.org.au/better-to-lose-australia/

    -----
    Soviet troop strength in the east never fell below 1.1 million men, with significant military assets deployed throughout the war...
    -----

    Replies: @ganainm

    Stalin kept 1.1 million troops in the east throughout the entire war.

    How many did he send West?? I’m basing that 2 million number from the memoirs of a participant.

  • I am a huge Bonapartist. I support the Napoleonic code, the establishment of a pan-European Empire under French leadership, and the destruction of the Holy Roman Empire and the reorganization of the German States as the Confederation of the Rhine. Napoleon himself, however, I abhor. While he led from the front, repeatedly risking his life...
  • Insisting that people HAVE TO defend the guy who lost against the Jews almost 100 years ago now is exactly why national socialist lose and why they unwittingly fall directly into the Jewish framework. To worship a “hero” who lost sounds exactly like people who will be eating goy slop forever.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Trinity
    @Piffle

    Explain to me the mindset of Whites who slaughtered other Whites who were defending themselves from World Kikery. Better to be a loser than a sellout, race traitor or a slave. Nothing worse than a traitor, they receive no respect even from the people who use them as crash dummies. No statues of Benedict Arnold in England. Lol. I don’t get it with my fellow Whites, they will fight like tigers against other Whites for the benefit of some non white racist or kikes set on destroying them in the end. Unbelievable.IF I had been a German American at the time, no way in hell I am going to be drafted to serve in the armed forces.
    , @Alexandros
    @Piffle

    Lost? You're not even in the game. No political actor since Hitler has been. Just a bunch of mediocrities blowing hot air into nothingness.

    Hitler was a great man. You do not deserve him.
  • @Europe will crush the United States now
    Funny that you say that. The Jews control all white countries now. The white race is a dead race. In Europe, pro-Hitler statements are punishable with 5 years in prison. Make this 7 years, as of July 2025. Trump America must follow suit or will be totally destroyed just like Hitler Germany. The Jews run America you see. They run China too. You can rape white German girls and kick German boys in the teeth--no punishment. If they fight back, they are Nazis. Same for white Americans, soon. Total global persecution. It is what it is. The Jews are going after every one of the whites, until all that's left is a brown soup if humanity.

    Replies: @Thomasina

    The game isn’t over yet. It’s only the first quarter.

  • @Aldonichts
    Certainly a personal, courageous, and valid response. But Parker's assertions can be refuted point by point. As Carlton Meyer and especially John Regan have done in the comments on Parker's article. And you don't have to be an Aryan or a National Socialist to affirm that Parker's article loses.

    Replies: @Poupon Marx

    And I can levitate, too. Watch me now:

    Video Link
    Do you love me, now that I can dance?

  • @HdC
    @europeasant

    Every military move made by Germany was ultimately of defensive nature. Every single one!

    Replies: @John Johnson

    Every military move made by Germany was ultimately of defensive nature. Every single one!

    Explain the defensive nature of trying to starve the Christian Slavs of Leningrad to death.

  • HVMII says:
    March 25, 2025 at 4:12 pm GMT •ï¿½1,000 Words

    I am not so sure it was Germany v. America as it was Germany v. Britian which was still the world’s dominant imperial power and controlled by the Rothschild- Morgan network. I agree that Jewish world money played a huge role in pushing for the war – just look at Roosevelt’s cabinet, but the USA was still a part of the Anglo-American establishment and not totally under the control of world Jewry. Rockefeller had significant investments in Germany and was more interested in Asia than in Europe. However, owing to his indebtedness to the Focus, Churchill was under the control of world Jewry.

    Remember that US public was very much opposed to the European war when it broke out in 1939 owing to the fact that many Americans saw it as a war for the British Empire. At least 85% of the US public opposed the war right up to late 1941. Moreover, one cannot even trust the lesser numbers presented by Gallop Poll after the start of 1941, because Gallop had been taken over by William Stephenson of the MI-6 through the British Security Coordination.

    It is true, that Germany had Europe’s youngest population and needed agricultural ground to feed itself. Hence, Lebensraum. However, it was not the USA putting up a block to Lebensraum. It was Britain, because British policy has always been to side with the weaker power in Europe, so as to maintain its hegemony over the continent – especially for Halford Mackinder’s Heartland. Many people seem to forget that the vast majority of Central European countries were on board with Germany v. the USSR – not the other way around. One could argue that if Hitler and the National Socialist Party’s racial policies had not been so extreme regarding the Slavs – if they found some way of incorporating the Slavs into the greater Reich (not just as feudal serfs or starving them to death) – we would not even be having this discussion in the first place. The fact is that the Germans were reluctant to use the Ukrainian division led by Bandera, because the Germans were concerned that they would have to make some concessions to the Ukrainian nationalists at the end of the war. This racial attitude may have been Germany’s biggest mistake. Why not give the Slavs some economic autonomy to serve the greater Reich in an almost EU fashion as long as they do not compete with the Reich’s industrial base? Besides ridding Germany of Jewish influence (which the Havarra Agreement established with the Lehi Zionists led by Yitzak Shamir), Hitler essentially wanted a greater trade zone which was in nationalist hands – not in the hands of Jewish global finance.

    In regard to military tactics, John Mosier’s Deathride says Hitler was tactically correct. Moreover, in Hoggan’s The Unnecessary War, Hoggan points out that it was the upper classes, especially the upper classes in the newly organized OKW-OKH (OKH was East Front only), that sabotaged Hitler’s program from the start, because they did not want the upstart Nationals Socialists to succeed. When discussing his biography of Rudolf Hess, David Irving stated that Hitler wanted to shelf the National Socialist Party – especially the more rabid Judeophobes within the party. Irving also says that Hitler told Hess that he “wanted the Gaultier’s off his back.â€

    I really do not know how Conte can leave out Hitler’s Hegelian perspective, whereby Hitler juxtaposed the internationalist connections between Capitalism and Judeo-Marxist Bolshevism. This issue was central to Hitler’s National Socialism. And if you read Solzhenitsyn’s 100 Years of Living Together the existence of Jewish Marxist Bolshevism and its support from capitalists is indisputable. Moreover, contrary to much of the self-serving disinformation, Solzhenitsyn clearly shows that the Jews were not purged from the governing organs of the USRR during Stalin’s reign. Where Conte is correct, is in his statement that it is “too difficult to argue for the Truth in the lie-riddled world we live in,†and maybe he does not want to delve into these weeds about the Jewish dialectic.

    In my view Conte’s conclusion that Hitler left the world with a pro-White political outcome is problematic. The west is no longer pro-white. Western governments have turned against the whites for various economic and political reasons much of which can be traced back to the victory of international globalism and to post-war Jewish Cultural Marxism. I think Lindbergh’s assessment is much more correct (similar Viktor Orban’s recent assessment of Ukraine war). The Second World War in Europe was a civil war among – and the destruction of – the European race. I would also argue that Hitler was a gambler and he misjudged several issues such as Britain’s determination to make war (you could say on behalf of Jewish finance – to note Germany’s decision to implement autarky and suspend debt payments in 1933 started the financial war when Germany was labeled a trade violator in 1934), or the vast depth of the USSR and the perceived weakness of the Soviet army due to Stalin’s purges (there is also the Suvorov thesis – was Stalin trying to provoke Hitler – Molotov’s visit to Berlin in late 1940 would say yes), and the fact that FDR would have had a hard time declaring war on Germany had not Hitler declared war on the USA first (was it really necessary to declare war on the USA despite the fact that FDR was clearly drawing the US into Europe’s war like Woodrow Wilson did in the first war?). I suppose these are weeds which Conte is correct in saying that there disinformation/hyperbolic propagandization about the war that it is near impossible to refute every single-issue point-by-point.

    •ï¿½Replies: @John Johnson
    @HVMII

    It is true, that Germany had Europe’s youngest population and needed agricultural ground to feed itself. Hence, Lebensraum. However, it was not the USA putting up a block to Lebensraum. It was Britain, because British policy has always been to side with the weaker power in Europe

    It was Chamberlain and the British conservatives that wanted Hitler to attack the USSR.

    Hitler had a dozen different ways of expanding Germany. Britain is not at fault for his mistakes.

    It was the petty trench running corporal that broke the Munich agreement after swearing he was done gobbling up land. He then invaded Poland knowing full well that it could spark a world war.

    Make all the excuses you want but he could have gone East without attacking Poland.

    In fact in his book he wrote that going East was the path for Germany. His generals also originally wanted Germany to push East and not get involved with France or Britain. They were correctly concerned with a repeat of WW1 with island fortress Britain backed by US production. Hitler even wrote that he wouldn't make the mistake of a two front war.

    The Germans have always been flawed by a combination of arrogance and rigid conformity. Hitler's original plan was to actually attack France through Belgium which was a copy of WW1. The Ardennes plan only happened because the Belgium plan was accidentally leaked to the Allies. It matched entirely what the Allies expected. Hitler was depicted as a war genius for the Ardennes plan but it was never his idea and was actually a plan B.

    Hitler was not a hero of Europe. He made a deal with the worst Communist to ship Catholic Poles off to camps. He planned on starving millions of Slavs to death. A mass murderer and not a liberator.
  • @TeutonicDane
    What an Excellent article. Always good to call out the charlatans.

    The Truth is the Truth is the Truth. You either go all the way and embrace the TRUTH, or you are a charlatan and trying to misdirect or deceive. I don't like it and couldn't do it personally, but I have some understanding why some do it for money (as in they don't want to lose all their money and future money). And some of them can still do some good, at least in a small part. But the ones that do it to support the literal agenda of our enslavers, hope you are Still having fun being yahweh/jehovah/baals little bi*** in the afterlife. Good luck! I choose God, personally.

    I've said for years and years, this huh-white "nationalism" scene, aka globalism for all the vast and various ppl with whitish pigmented skin, I believe is run by the Feds. And mainly preys on rootless cosmopolitan or mixed "Americans". But lately I have been seeing this "huh-white" talk in various European news. The victim was "huh-white". The % of the population that is "huh-white". You mean a German? Or an Irish? Or a French, or Italian, or Greek, or Bohemian, etc., etc.. "huh-white", It literally is giving various invaders ownership of the people/race. Everyone is exactly who they are because of who they are, the soil or place doesn't change that FACT. Having similar pigmented skin to another, doesn't change that. You could use the mongrelized Ashkenazis as a perfect example of this. Yeah, they probably have some Polak or Russian blood, but are they Polish or Russian?! I think we all know the answer to that. THEY DO anyways!

    The answer is in embracing Tradition, not new age huh-white "nationalism". You can have respect and recognize shared or similar culture/history/ancient distant genetic relations. It doesn't have to mean globalism, or "okay ill accept these invader immigrants to take what is mine and for my children, because at least they have whitish pigmented skin".

    And btw, any Man with Honor and Knowledge, never armchair quarterbacks or criticizes the actual Man in the Arena. And definitely not a Legendary Hero of Old. A literal Avatar.

    I admire any people that are free and sovereign in this current age of filth, and there are not very many. But that does not make me Russian because I admire Russia or Putin, that does not make me Chinese, because I admire the Chinese, that does not make me Iranian, because I admire the Iranians. I hope one day Germanic people will join them in the ranks of the free and sovereign "peoples" on this Earth. We shall see if we survive. But I will never give up trying. And it is going to be a long long road because of the depths we have sunk to. But if by chance we somehow survive, those that exist, will be WORTHY.

    Replies: @anon, @Emslander, @Jeffrey A Freeman, @Odd Rabbit, @John Johnson

    But that does not make me Russian because I admire Russia or Putin, that does not make me Chinese, because I admire the Chinese, that does not make me Iranian, because I admire the Iranians. I hope one day Germanic people will join them in the ranks of the free and sovereign “peoples†on this Earth.

    Does Ukraine get to be on that list or do you admire Putin for trying to force them into his totalitarian empire?

  • Trinity says:
    @Passing by
    @Trinity

    They all deserved to burn in hell. Having bad guys on one side doesn't necessarily mean that good guys are on the opposite. The opposite of good is evil, the opposite of virtue is sin, the opposite of truth is a lie, but the opposite of evil can also be evil, the opposite of sin can also be sin and the opposite of a lie can also be a lie.

    Replies: @Trinity

    From my view in the cheap seats it looks like the Germans appeared to be the obvious “good guys†on this one. The Jews wanted to do the same thing in Germany that they had already done in the old Soviet Jewnion. Hitler and Germany were fighting for their survival, lest we forget the HOLODOMOR took place in 1932-1933, and “World Jewry†declared war on Germany in 1933. And lest we forget the rapes of millions of German women by the Allies, the Eisenhower Death Camps, etc.

    And while we weren’t around to actually see WWII up close and personal, anyone with an ounce of truth, integrity, or a moral compass can tell you that “World Jewry†after WWII did in fact behave just as Hitler said they would. IF you are a Believer, and believe me I have my doubts about it all, even Mother Teresa confessed their was a point in her life where she questioned the existence of God, you will know that MOST will not make it to Heaven in the end. I admit to my doubts about God, BUT, I have no doubt that the corrupt Allied leaders are feeling the heat IF Hell exists. HOWEVER, most people don’t obtain the kind of power Hitler wielded by being a choirboy.

    It seems the Jew and his henchmen in the case of World WarII are like the truly evil murderer who kills someone and frames an innocent person as the murderer. That takes a special kind of evil.

    •ï¿½Thanks: Cloverleaf
  • @Franz
    @nokangaroos

    Tariffs are just boogy men for free trade hucksters.

    They only amount to another tax, and we have too many already so no it won't help Americans at all.

    Most Logical Outcome -- Tariffs, if Trump is stupid enough to pursue them, will do for the targeted nations what sanctions did for Russia -- which got more prosperous.

    We'll see lots of energy expended on internal markets from Canada to China, making all these nations wealthier while leaving the US stuck in the mud of diminishing returns.

    The good part is economic dislocations will hit Trump voters first and hardest. MAGA will get shitcanned, the borders will be closed to keep America's coming civil war contained.

    And Trump will get run out of town.

    Replies: @V. K. Ovelund

    Tariffs are just boogy men for free trade hucksters.

    They only amount to another tax, and we have too many already so no it won’t help Americans at all.

    What other kind of tax would you prefer to pay, instead, though, and why?

  • Hear hear!

    Great piece.

    I was very offput by the article under discussion, and I’m glad to see Mr. Conte offer such a robust rebuttal.

  • To the shock and dismay of those of a more mainstream, conservative persuasion, many different voices in dissident right, far right, and populist right circles have expressed adulation, admiration, and approval for Adolf Hitler, seemingly without qualification or reservation.[1] Particularly in “Culture as Programming,†I have expressed sympathy for and agreement with much of the...
  • @Patrick McNally
    @truthor

    > This is untrue as Churchill noted that the cause of the war was the fact that Germany was upsetting the apple cart in its debt free and bartering economy which threatened the international banking system of international Jewry.

    Churchill never said anything of the sort.

    https://gizmodo.com/9-quotes-from-winston-churchill-that-are-totally-fake-1790585636

    -----
    This quote appears to have been invented in 2001 and inserted into the foreword to a new edition of a book first written in 1938, Propaganda in the Next War. Since the book is out of copyright and the original author is dead, the new foreword could’ve been written by any lunatic with an account on a self-publishing site.

    All we know for sure is that the quote doesn’t appear anywhere before 2001.
    -----

    Replies: @John Wear, @Truth Vigilante

    Patrick ‘Shlomo’ McNally writes:

    Churchill never said anything of the sort.

    Well, it looks like John Wear has slapped you down once more (refer to his comment # 304).
    It could well be in the three figure territory that John Wear, through countless hammerings he’s dished out your way over the years, where he exposed you as a BALD-FACED LIAR.

    And in return, you have not refuted A SINGLE THING that John Wear has ever posted.
    Shlomo, you really are a glutton for punishment. You just keep lying and posting Jewish talking points.
    Why don’t you sit back, relax, and learn TRUE HISTORY from Mr Wear?

    Surely that would be a better option than getting battered to a pulp day in and day out, after being exposed yet again as a peddler of falsehoods?

  • I am a huge Bonapartist. I support the Napoleonic code, the establishment of a pan-European Empire under French leadership, and the destruction of the Holy Roman Empire and the reorganization of the German States as the Confederation of the Rhine. Napoleon himself, however, I abhor. While he led from the front, repeatedly risking his life...
  • @Stephen Paul Foster

    I don’t know who Mr. Parker is.
    �
    I don't know who Mr. Conte is, but after reading this rant, I have serious reservations about the clinical stability of the author --

    As one of the only public National Socialists in the world, I can say that Mr. Parker does not understand the first thing about National Socialist ideology.
    �
    The "world," no less. This seems to shout: "Up the Thorazine!"

    Replies: @Poupon Marx, @V. K. Ovelund

    I don’t know who Mr. Conte is….

    Mr.�Conte is a titan of the old Alt-Right.

  • @europeasant
    Pissing off your neighbors by killing thousands of them and destroying their cities is no way to make friends. In fact you have just created mortal enemies who will retaliate and destroy you. Most people just want to live life, eat drink and be merry. But now by killing many of them you have just pissed off quite of few of these people and will pay the price. Besides, calling them "Untermenschen" is no way to make friends.

    Nationalism is fine. Just keep it within your own borders. If Hitler tried to invade my personal property I'd bitch slap him till he came to his senses.

    That's probably why Europe is in such a sad state today. Millions of Europeans killed. Europe united is how European people will survive in a world with rapidly changing demographics.

    Replies: @Kilmore Trotter, @HdC

    Every military move made by Germany was ultimately of defensive nature. Every single one!

    •ï¿½Replies: @John Johnson
    @HdC

    Every military move made by Germany was ultimately of defensive nature. Every single one!

    Explain the defensive nature of trying to starve the Christian Slavs of Leningrad to death.
  • Crush Limbraw says: •ï¿½Website

    Hitler, Churchill, Stalin, FDR, Napoleon……whoever…they’re all bit players….here today gone tomorrow….just like us.
    When overwhelmed with facts of minutae – step back to look at a bigger picture – and the bigger picture shows……..

    In order to gain an understanding of a question and in the context of history, we have to go beyond the material mind to a spiritual level – meaning Biblical perspective – but don’t expect any revelations from your typical churchian gathering…….they’re as deceived as anyone else. In fact, the first target of the DaSynagogue of Satan (DSOS) was to infiltrate and converge Christianity into churchianity – the rest was easy peasy. For example, without the full backing of Evangelicals by the millions, DSOS would be a minor irritant only, and not our ruler as is currently the case.
    I have archived a series of articles – https://crushlimbraw.blogspot.com/search?q=Synagogue+of+satan&updated-max=2022-10-15T10:01:00-07:00&max-results=20&start=0&by-date=false&m=1 – on DaSynagogue of Satan (DSOS) – a list of headnotes here which will be useful for any researcher on the subject.
    Very simply, this is not only a spiritual battle, it goes back to the beginning and manifests itself in various forms……but in essence…it always was, is and will be a war on Christ…..until His ultimate victory…..which is only a matter of time – http://crushlimbraw.blogspot.com/2021/03/in-essenceit-always-wasand-still-isa.html – Translation: Russia as a nation is NOW the last outpost of Christianity which is resisting the onslaught of the DSOS controlled ‘Western Civilization’ – DaEmpire of Lies and Evil – which has been totally converged and ruled by DSOS for decades – yes, the servants of DSOS can change their stripes, colors and outward appearance at will – and they will deceive millions – but not all of us.
    Fortunately for all of us – the days of DaEmpire of Lies and Evil are almost done!

  • To the shock and dismay of those of a more mainstream, conservative persuasion, many different voices in dissident right, far right, and populist right circles have expressed adulation, admiration, and approval for Adolf Hitler, seemingly without qualification or reservation.[1] Particularly in “Culture as Programming,†I have expressed sympathy for and agreement with much of the...
  • Carolyn Yeager says: •ï¿½Website
    @truthor
    Many, if not most of Mr. Parker’s claims are simply not true except in a simplistic way.

    “These claims [to Danzig and Posen] were ultimately a principal if not the principal catalyst for the outbreak of war when Germany invaded Poland in 1939…â€

    This is untrue as Churchill noted that the cause of the war was the fact that Germany was upsetting the apple cart in its debt free and bartering economy which threatened the international banking system of international Jewry. They recognized immediately that Hitler was their enemy and they had to destroy him, and that was the reason for the 1933 Declaration of War against Germany.

    “And the notion that Austrians are a distinct nationality separate and apart from Germany is somewhat dubious, as the difference in dialect, customs and so on is no more pronounced than certain other regions in Germany…â€

    Very true. One might speak of the Germanies rather than Germany per se. Austria is simply one of the many German states which became divided between the Kingdom of Prussia and the Austrian Empire. Originally the Holy Roman Empire encompassed all the various German states, which fragmented and then were consolidated under either Austrian or Prussian suzerainty. Thus, the anschluss was actually a reunification of the Germanies into the Prussian German State, with its various duchies, principalities, etc. Hitler actually created the modern German state by getting rid of these and making federal states. Of course, Austria was ripped from Germany proper in 1945.

    “The aftermath of the Sudetenland crisis, in which Hitler partitioned the rest of Czechoslovakia between the Reich and a newly formed puppet state of Slovakia in March of 1939, is the first outrage for which Hitler is rightly condemned.â€

    Untrue. The Czech state was a frankenstein multi-ethnic state created by Versailles (much the same as Poland) with German, Czechs, Slovaks, Poles, and Hungarians within it. When Germany saved the persecuted German minority, Poland and Hungary wanted their citizens back as well. Thus The Czech state was collapsing, and did collapse after Slovakia declared their independence. So Czechia asked Hitler to become a Protectorate and did so.

    As Parker notes “Germany did not have legitimate territorial claims on the rest of Czechoslovakia, namely Bohemia and Moravia.†Which is true, but Germany did not absorb Bohemia and Moravia (i.e. Czechia) they accepted it as a German Protectorate which was not subject to German laws, were not drafted, and basically sat the war out in peace.

    So Parker’s conclusions from this “grab†for land bears no truth. Likewise it did not alienate Britain, which had determined to go to war against Germany, but not in 1938 because their defense industry was not yet strong enough.

    “Manstein’s masterstroke, the Sichelschnitt.†It was shown that this was, in fact, Hitler’s plan, but he had trouble selling it to the General Staff. When Manstein presented his plan, which was basically the same as Hitler’s, Hitler could sell it to the General Staff.

    “A pity that such a spectacular victory sowed the seeds of such catastrophic ruin and defeat, largely due to the blunders and shortcomings of Adolf Hitler.â€

    This is untrue. The war was lost, not because of Hitler’s “blunders and shortcomingsâ€, but because of traitors within the nobility who sabotaged Hitler’s plans, poisoned him during the invasion of Russia, and through high treason sold out Germany to the Allies for their pieces of silver. Not to mention some 80 attempts to kill their legitimate leader.

    Mr. Parker should acquaint himself with the work of Prof. Dr. David Hoggan, and modern scholarship on this subject.

    Replies: @Patrick McNally, @The Old Philosopher, @Carolyn Yeager

    “Manstein’s masterstroke, the Sichelschnitt.†It was shown that this was, in fact, Hitler’s plan, but he had trouble selling it to the General Staff. When Manstein presented his plan, which was basically the same as Hitler’s, Hitler could sell it to the General Staff.

    Thank you, Truthor, for stating that “Manstein’s Plan” was Hitler’s Plan, which AH had designed in greater detail before Manstein told him about his own plan! According to Hitler’s friend & architect, Hermann Geisler, the Fuehrer had already been secretly working on the plan and it was far advanced in tactical details by the time Manstein reported his similar plan to AH in the middle of February, 1940. But Hitler was thrilled that Manstein saw it the same way; that gave him even more confidence in his own conclusions. Read it in Hitler’s own words in Giesler’s memoir Ein Anderer Hitler, 1977, Druffel-Verlag or in Wilhelm Kriessmann’s English translation “The Artist Within the Warlord,” 3rd edition August 2018, pp. 43-45.
    “I still kept silent … It would not have been prudent to let Manstein know how far advanced beyond the basic strategic concept the tactical details had already been worked out.” p. 45

    The war was lost, not because of Hitler’s “blunders and shortcomingsâ€, but because of traitors within the nobility who sabotaged Hitler’s plans, poisoned him during the invasion of Russia, and through high treason sold out Germany to the Allies for their pieces of silver.

    This is provably true, and should be emphasized more than it is. See Chapt. 7, pp. 115-122 in the above mentioned translation “The Artist Within the Warlord.” Again, thank you for doing so.

  • I am a huge Bonapartist. I support the Napoleonic code, the establishment of a pan-European Empire under French leadership, and the destruction of the Holy Roman Empire and the reorganization of the German States as the Confederation of the Rhine. Napoleon himself, however, I abhor. While he led from the front, repeatedly risking his life...
  • @TeutonicDane
    What an Excellent article. Always good to call out the charlatans.

    The Truth is the Truth is the Truth. You either go all the way and embrace the TRUTH, or you are a charlatan and trying to misdirect or deceive. I don't like it and couldn't do it personally, but I have some understanding why some do it for money (as in they don't want to lose all their money and future money). And some of them can still do some good, at least in a small part. But the ones that do it to support the literal agenda of our enslavers, hope you are Still having fun being yahweh/jehovah/baals little bi*** in the afterlife. Good luck! I choose God, personally.

    I've said for years and years, this huh-white "nationalism" scene, aka globalism for all the vast and various ppl with whitish pigmented skin, I believe is run by the Feds. And mainly preys on rootless cosmopolitan or mixed "Americans". But lately I have been seeing this "huh-white" talk in various European news. The victim was "huh-white". The % of the population that is "huh-white". You mean a German? Or an Irish? Or a French, or Italian, or Greek, or Bohemian, etc., etc.. "huh-white", It literally is giving various invaders ownership of the people/race. Everyone is exactly who they are because of who they are, the soil or place doesn't change that FACT. Having similar pigmented skin to another, doesn't change that. You could use the mongrelized Ashkenazis as a perfect example of this. Yeah, they probably have some Polak or Russian blood, but are they Polish or Russian?! I think we all know the answer to that. THEY DO anyways!

    The answer is in embracing Tradition, not new age huh-white "nationalism". You can have respect and recognize shared or similar culture/history/ancient distant genetic relations. It doesn't have to mean globalism, or "okay ill accept these invader immigrants to take what is mine and for my children, because at least they have whitish pigmented skin".

    And btw, any Man with Honor and Knowledge, never armchair quarterbacks or criticizes the actual Man in the Arena. And definitely not a Legendary Hero of Old. A literal Avatar.

    I admire any people that are free and sovereign in this current age of filth, and there are not very many. But that does not make me Russian because I admire Russia or Putin, that does not make me Chinese, because I admire the Chinese, that does not make me Iranian, because I admire the Iranians. I hope one day Germanic people will join them in the ranks of the free and sovereign "peoples" on this Earth. We shall see if we survive. But I will never give up trying. And it is going to be a long long road because of the depths we have sunk to. But if by chance we somehow survive, those that exist, will be WORTHY.

    Replies: @anon, @Emslander, @Jeffrey A Freeman, @Odd Rabbit, @John Johnson

    “You either go all the way and embrace the TRUTH, or you are a charlatan and trying to misdirect or deceive.”
    The Jewish Man Hitler Praised and Helped
    When Austria joined the German Reich in March 1938, Hitler helped the Jewish physician in Linz who had been the doctor for his family when he was a boy and teenager. He remembered Eduard Bloch with gratitude. He said of him: “If all Jews were like him, there would be no Jewish question.†After the 66-year-old Bloch wrote to Hitler asking for help, the German leader personally intervened to ensure his safety. The doctor and his wife remained in Linz without disturbance for nearly three years. Then, they left to join their daughter in New York City. In the US, Dr. Bloch spoke honestly about Hitler as a boy and young man to US officials who questioned him, and he wrote truthfully for publication about the German leader’s character and personality. This video was written and researched by Tony Wilkins. Runtime: 14:52 mins. — https://ihr.org

    Video Link

  • To the shock and dismay of those of a more mainstream, conservative persuasion, many different voices in dissident right, far right, and populist right circles have expressed adulation, admiration, and approval for Adolf Hitler, seemingly without qualification or reservation.[1] Particularly in “Culture as Programming,†I have expressed sympathy for and agreement with much of the...
  • @Anonymous534
    @geokat62

    Sure, any day now. Two more weeks.

    Replies: @geokat62

    Sure, any day now. Two more weeks.

    Something tells me this comment won’t age well. But, only time will tell.

  • I am a huge Bonapartist. I support the Napoleonic code, the establishment of a pan-European Empire under French leadership, and the destruction of the Holy Roman Empire and the reorganization of the German States as the Confederation of the Rhine. Napoleon himself, however, I abhor. While he led from the front, repeatedly risking his life...
  • @Kilmore Trotter
    I can hardly feel any sympathy for Nazi cause or the person of A.H, for I am one of those Slavs who would have been robbed of their own homes and country. After Munich Czechs were toeing the line, allowing them to administer their own affairs while being part of a larger state would have been mere return to the situation before 1918. Bohemia and Moravia had always been attached to the empire of Germans in one way or the other. Sometimes local kings were emperors themselves, or the emperors were also Czech kings (as in case of Habsburg dynasty). It would have been the safest course of action to return to this arrangement and avoid direct annexation, mandatory usage of German in public affairs, establishing Gestapo offices in the country, or killing off and razing entire villages because of specific partisan attacks. Establishment of the Protektorat was inexcusably stupid move that moved Czechs to hate Germans and support the exile government in London.

    And the very same can be said about Slavs in the annexed Soviet territories. Had a reasonable postwar arrangement including restoration of Russian empire and orthodox church been formulated the war would never have become existential struggle for most of the Soviet population. Yet Germany could have obtained substantial territories in the East exactly as was the plan, only the plan would have to be put into effect after victorious war, the way it was done to Poland by Allies.

    However, Hitler and his party could not really make themselves to fashion their conquest this way. Hitler's idea of history was that of struggle of nations, he also had clear notion of hierarchy of nations and would not really take wishes and feelings of lower races into account, even if for reasons of political and military expediency. Disastrous results were inevitable consequence of these Nazi axioms. That's certain, even though we cannot say with the same certainty whether a more clever approach would have been enough to tilt the scales in Reich's favour.

    Replies: @craicaassmofo

    German ego. Most of them have it. AH channeled it into a war against the Eastern Aryan world.

    The only thing that can contain the German/Germanic/Nordic ego is to box them in in their homelands. They can never be allowed to expand.

    Just like was done to the Japs and the same needs to be done now to the egotistical Chinaman.

    •ï¿½Agree: Passing by
  • A lot of this stuff comes out of /pol/, which has become a petri dish for testing out mental schema that are supposed to consensus crack right wing thought
    They even go as far as saying that Hitler was actually a jewish agent who’s only purpose was to kill as many whites as possible. You often see these types in the unz comment section as well and their frenzied, antagonistic posting style outs them as /pol/ users.
    These types of people simply must be ignored and ejected from the right wing. They can go to the left where they belong and they should feel quite at home on the left with their fascination with transsexualism and interracial pornography.

  • @Trinity
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    IF Mr. H is in Hell, he is joined by Stalin, FDR, Churchill and countless lying Jews. Lol. And that would be a lot of murdering as well as lying Jews who orchestrated the death of tens of millions of Whites killing each other Whites in two World Wars.

    Never Forget 911
    5 Dancing Shlomos

    Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert, @Passing by

    They all deserved to burn in hell. Having bad guys on one side doesn’t necessarily mean that good guys are on the opposite. The opposite of good is evil, the opposite of virtue is sin, the opposite of truth is a lie, but the opposite of evil can also be evil, the opposite of sin can also be sin and the opposite of a lie can also be a lie.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Trinity
    @Passing by

    From my view in the cheap seats it looks like the Germans appeared to be the obvious “good guys†on this one. The Jews wanted to do the same thing in Germany that they had already done in the old Soviet Jewnion. Hitler and Germany were fighting for their survival, lest we forget the HOLODOMOR took place in 1932-1933, and “World Jewry†declared war on Germany in 1933. And lest we forget the rapes of millions of German women by the Allies, the Eisenhower Death Camps, etc.

    And while we weren’t around to actually see WWII up close and personal, anyone with an ounce of truth, integrity, or a moral compass can tell you that “World Jewry†after WWII did in fact behave just as Hitler said they would. IF you are a Believer, and believe me I have my doubts about it all, even Mother Teresa confessed their was a point in her life where she questioned the existence of God, you will know that MOST will not make it to Heaven in the end. I admit to my doubts about God, BUT, I have no doubt that the corrupt Allied leaders are feeling the heat IF Hell exists. HOWEVER, most people don’t obtain the kind of power Hitler wielded by being a choirboy.

    It seems the Jew and his henchmen in the case of World WarII are like the truly evil murderer who kills someone and frames an innocent person as the murderer. That takes a special kind of evil.
  • To the shock and dismay of those of a more mainstream, conservative persuasion, many different voices in dissident right, far right, and populist right circles have expressed adulation, admiration, and approval for Adolf Hitler, seemingly without qualification or reservation.[1] Particularly in “Culture as Programming,†I have expressed sympathy for and agreement with much of the...
  • @Dimitrie
    @Alden

    Spain under Francisco Franco was the only country which won in XX century against the flow. He put a solid start for Spain.

    Franco, nearing the end of his life, predicted what would happen after his death: ‘Spain will go a long way down the road that [the West] wants: democracy, pornography, drugs and so on. There will be a lot of crazy things but nothing terminal.’ I hope his right with nothing terminal.

    He also added how that is so sure, ‘Because I’m leaving something that I didn’t find on taking over the government of this country 40 years ago: the Spanish middle class… There won’t be another civil war.’

    I 2019 remains of Franco were removed from the Valley of the Fallen. That's speaks a lot about the gratitude of kings (Felipe has the crown because Franco enthroned his father) and peoples alike.

    Remind me of the Kipling verses:

    Take up the White Man's burden—
    And reap his old reward:
    The blame of those ye better,
    The hate of those ye guard
    —

    Replies: @Poupon Marx

    Thanks. I have cited Franco as one of Spain’s excellent heroes and saviors. Same with Generalissimo Augusto Pinochet. After departing, both countries were again suffused with the same rodents and cucarachas. Same vermin. I visited Spain under Franco in the 70s. Beautiful and prosperous. Same with Brazil under the Generals. Safe, calm, and expanding economy [given the low IQ population of Brazil, much of which is a suburb of Africa].

  • @Tiptoethrutulips
    @Patrick McNally


    So, what’s your point?
    �
    That Jews are often over-represented in movements to inorganically restructure society; their goal is not to benefit society at large, but to emancipate Jewry to further subjugate the “little guys†for whom they pretend to advocate. They care NOT for Gentile society unless they can benefit or use it for gain; or to disrupt their classic enemy - a homogeneous “White†nation; say, perhaps, like the real purpose of the NAACP….

    had mixed feelings…He believed its radicalism and materialism would destroy much of the European culture that he loved and admired.
    �
    Oh? So, he disavowed Marx, communism, and the Jewish element thereof? I’m guessing - NO.

    Ian Kershaw, Hitler: 1889-1936, Hubris
    �
    Does Ian Kershaw also say that Hitler murdered 6 million Jews in gas chambers? And, that he sacked Austria? And, that Germany had their Evil Eyes on South America until the SLB got his paws on that Secret Map? And, that Churchill and SLBFDR were fine statesmen who saved the World from tyranny to establish a Democracy that has been used to magically shift the demographics within Europe/European nations to include black/brown cesspools of ineptitude and crime in the interests of Never Again! and to install a democratic process that We never actually wanted/approved/voted on?

    Stop supporting/spreading lies, exaggerations, obfuscations, and more lies, Pretzel.

    Replies: @Patrick McNally

    > movements to inorganically restructure society

    The type of movements which were occurring in the mid-19th century were much more naturally organic than anything which can be said about the German National Socialist Party in the 1920-45 period. The only functional program which Hitler had was to prepare the German military until it was ready to expand and then set out to acquire living space. If Hitler had died of a stroke in early 1939, then he probably would have been remembered much better as some kind of “organic” leader. But his determination to sweep across Czechia as preparation for a drive to the east for living space was a very personal agenda that did not spring organically from anywhere else.

    The development and growth of the Social Democratic Party from the late 19th to early 20th centuries was probably the most significant organic development that ever happened in Germany during the 19th & 20th centuries. Unfortunately, the Social Democrats did well as labor leaders but were not prepared for dealing with the emergence of Germany as a major imperial power. They voted for war credits in 1914, when all labor parties across Europe should have been denouncing the war. The Social Democrats played a central role in enabling the continuation of the war for 4 years, and then the scoundrel Ludendorff simply smeared them with charges of a stab in the back. If the Social Democrats had simply disintegrated as a party in early 1914, then it is likely that the German war effort would have broken down in 1916 at the latest and this would have been better for the world. After World War I all of the parties showed a lot of confusion and none of them can really be characterized as “organic” in the way that the influences of people like Heine and Marx in the 19th century often were.

  • @Tiptoethrutulips
    @Poupon Marx


    This is NOT forensic evidence, e.g., pottery shards, DNA, writing, etc. These are observations from human beings
    �
    Are there any writings that can’t be classified as observations from human beings?

    Is there NO forensic evidence that refutes the official narratives of WW2/so-called Holocaust? Is there any forensic evidence that supports the so-called Holocaust? What, then, is/was the point of creating such a fantastic story with essentially no forensic evidence, but gobs of “personal observations?â€

    How has the concocted tale been maintained/protected from scrutiny?

    that all events of this dimension have multiple antecedents
    �
    No one denies this, meine Kröte. But, was there something elemental, beyond just human nature, at the core of the 20th century conflicts?

    Germany not only assisted with the germination of these Parasites, but provided them with resources at the cost of their own populations commonweal. And then finally when they have gained strength, like the movie Alien the body burst from the belly of the host.
    �
    No, not “Germany,†just like not all Americans support Israel; the truth of “Israel†and their shenanigans is obscured/unknown, generally, and have you been reading Mein Kampf again?

    You should read the servile, lickspittle, and abject concession of the Europeans to the Rothchilds in the 19th century, and their extracted wealth.
    �
    Did anyone in Europe try to stop this madness? I wonder….

    a marine engineer like me. I once had an essential piece of equipment that failed and had two causes,
    �
    1. Whiskey swilling.
    2. Lack of oversight due to excessive pining-away over that blonde steward who rejected you.

    Long afloat on shipless oceans…

    Now my foolish boat is leaning
    Broken lovelorn on your rocks

    Replies: @Poupon Marx

    Are there any writings that can’t be classified as observations from human beings?

    Of course there are, you dolt. Using a general query outside and without reference to the quotes under discussion is a weak logical fallacy and diversion; which is your forte these days, Miss Bo Peep.

    The rest of your comment consists of intellectually lazy and meaningless questions. Ask a more profound one, for example: “How much is that doggy in the window. The one with the waggety tail?”

    •ï¿½Replies: @Tiptoethrutulips
    @Poupon Marx


    Of course there are, you dolt.
    �
    Such as?

    without reference to the quotes under discussion
    �
    Which quotes are those to which you are referring? The one about your first escapee and a scary bear? Or, this one - Germany’s loss of WW2 has left the world in quite a state today - ?

    On the state of the world today, as Nathan/SnorkelGuy said, [Post WW2] “Immigration laws changed within ten years…reformed or restructured to such a degree that they basically abandoned all of the racial make-up of the native people of their places, and this didn’t matter if you were the winner or the loser of that horrible war against the “horrible Nazis.†Whichever side of that war you were on, your future was, your native population would eventually be replaced in numbers; by the birth rate or the names of the people coming in being foreign; or in your school system, the native population being demonized as especially bad, especially needing change….â€

    The utter falsehood known as the Holocaust/Shoah, which is now used as the justification for the entire war against Germany, mostly, and is the utmost indictment/denunciation against the character of Adolf Hitler, is the relevant issue about/on which I diverted.

    I visited Spain under Franco in the 70s. Beautiful and prosperous. Same with Brazil under the Generals.
    �
    Unlike Germany under Hitler before the western world descended upon the Germans in a way not done to the others?

    Meine Kröte, the problem is this - YOU are one of those foreigners who prospers within the nations of your classic enemies - Whites, Saxons, Germanics…whatever you want to call us, and that’s why you can not/will not admit that Hitler was a hero/defender of Germany/Europa. He was your classic enemy; same as that of Barbara Spectre, et al.

    I was in San Antonio recently; what happened to all the White Peoples? Barbara Roche would happily put down her desert fork to admire the dark splendor…

    For my dreams, I hold my life
    For wishes, I behold my night
    The truth at the end of time
    Losing faith makes a crime
  • I am a huge Bonapartist. I support the Napoleonic code, the establishment of a pan-European Empire under French leadership, and the destruction of the Holy Roman Empire and the reorganization of the German States as the Confederation of the Rhine. Napoleon himself, however, I abhor. While he led from the front, repeatedly risking his life...
  • @The Last Adam
    Thank God Hitler was defeated. Can you imagine not having hundreds of thousand Muslims turning Germany into Dar Al-Islam? Isn't that what Germany wants? What the EU wants? Oh wait,, I'm confused.

    Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert

    You don’t need a Hitler to avoid mass non-white immigration into your country. Ask the Hungarians about Viktor Orban. (Or ask the German party of AfD).

    •ï¿½Agree: Passing by
    •ï¿½Thanks: Poupon Marx
    •ï¿½Replies: @Poupon Marx
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    I am going to bed tonight and cry in my pillow because we do not and never will have the quality of leadership on the level of the current candidates of the AfD. What excellence, quality, and ability!!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kz2gv0m4mCM

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wO0A0XcWy88

    Replies: @nokangaroos
  • @Obersturmbannführer

    I don’t know who Mr. Parker is. Nobody does. For all I know, he could be a Jew. If so, I find his article encouraging. It means that the Jews feel their power threatened by National Socialism, so much so, that they have resorted to posing as National Socialists to undermine our morale and solidarity.
    �
    Several of my comments in Parker's thread at UR were blocked. I believe it was Parker, not Ron Unz, who blocked them. My last blocked comment was a thorough debunk of his exaggerations and lies about Dirlewanger. If anyone else had comments blocked on Parker's thread, I would be interested to know.

    I think that Parker is some kind of limited hangout or, as Cass Sunstein told us, an agent of "nudge". He is trying to "nudge" the alt-right away from discussions about Jewish depravity and sadism, and towards discussions about the foibles and shortcomings of the NSDAP, Germany and Germans in general.

    Replies: @Hinz, @Poupon Marx, @Obersturmbannführer

    It was likely your mother, who upon transferring your clothes to the dryer, saw your comments on the screen, in your absence, was embarrassed, and deleted your comment. Motherly love.

    Video Link

    Video Link
    Yank me, crank me, but don’t wake me up and thank me”

  • @ANON
    In reply to Franklin Ryckaert's comment: #comment-7050589

    Franklin, respectfully of you and your quotations from Wikipedia,

    I assume you are aware that Wikipedia is universally regarded as, on political matters, a highly biased source. Certainly everyone who is right-of-center regards it as such.

    For an example of its bias I encourage you to read Donald Trump's Wikipedia page. Or see this long-running Hoax.[1]

    So why would you, on this one (you must admit) highly politically contentious matter - perhaps *the* most contentious matter - treat Wikipedia as a reliable source, and shrug off and belittle the concerns that others would have about Wikipedia? Why would you do that? Because, perhaps, in this particular instance, Wikipedia happens to agree with and reinforce your own preconceptions of what WWII and Hitler were - preconceptions put in your head alongside your childhood breakfast Cheerios by the Jewish TeeVee?

    I encourage you to read what Karl Radl (he's on Substack and Twitter) has written on these subjects if you want to begin to deprogram yourself of your brainwashing.[2][3]

    Do you also regard Schindler's List, Life is Beautiful and Band of Brothers as documentaries - as so many of the low-information believers in the mainstream WWII narrative seem to?

    [1]
    Or you should read about The Longest Hoax in Wikipedia History in which, for 15 years, Wikipedia claimed that 200,000 Poles had been exterminated in a German death camp which never existed and was only corrected in 2019 because an Israeli research was unhappy that the Poles were getting in on the Jewish Holocaust grift. It makes you wonder what other "15 year"(!) plus hoaxes are running on Wikipedia right now but for which there is no incentive to correct because they're regarded to be politically useful, like this one was.

    https://ia801404.us.archive.org/8/items/haaretz-the-fake-nazi-death-camp-wikipedias-longest-hoax-exposed/Haaretz_The_Fake_Nazi_Death_Camp_Wikipedia%E2%80%99s_Longest_Hoax%2C_Exposed.pdf

    [2][3]
    https://twitter.com/KarlRadl
    https://karlradl14.substack.com

    Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert

    Actually the fact that that hoax by Polish nationalists could last for 15 years, shows that Jews don’t control Wikipedia completely.

  • To the shock and dismay of those of a more mainstream, conservative persuasion, many different voices in dissident right, far right, and populist right circles have expressed adulation, admiration, and approval for Adolf Hitler, seemingly without qualification or reservation.[1] Particularly in “Culture as Programming,†I have expressed sympathy for and agreement with much of the...
  • @John Wear
    @Patrick McNally

    You write: "Churchill never said anything of the sort."

    My response: Udo Walendy on page 276 of his book "Truth for Germany" wrote that American General Robert E. Wood stated at a Senate committee that Churchill had said to him in November 1936:

    "Germany is getting too strong, and we must smash her."

    Udo Walendy's sources for this quote are:

    1) J.F.C. Fuller, Decisive Battles of the Western World, vol. III, p. 369;

    2) Emrys Hughes, Winston Churchill--British Bulldog--His Career in War and Peace, New York 1955, p. 145; and

    3) "Hearings on Lend and Lease," February 1941, p. 275.

    Udo Walendy also quotes from a conversation Churchill had with the High Commissioner of the League of Nations, Carl J. Burckhardt, at the beginning of 1937:

    "Churchill was telling me that Germany was again getting too strong, the Germans were only impressed by power; in the event of an armed conflict, the excessive encroachments of National Socialism would help the British to a strong system of alliances." (Source: C.J. Burckhardt, Meine Danziger Mission 1937-1939, p. 70).

    Replies: @Patrick McNally

    The quotes which you allege have a very different tone to them from the claims about “debt free … economy … banking.” A statement like “Germany is getting too strong” is simply a reference to military strength, independent of economics. Churchill was certainly aware of the German military build-up. 1936 was an important year because that was when Hjalmar Schacht decided that the German military had achieved enough for a basic defense. From that point on, Schacht argued that Germany needed to know give more attention to conventional economics, i.e., development of export trade.

    Instead, Hitler resolved to accelerate the military build-up with the intent of achieving expansion within a few years. This greatly stressed the German economy, since a large portion of labor was focused on non-productive military industries. Churchill never made any statements which indicated a high respect for the German economy outside of military applications.

    •ï¿½LOL: HdC
  • I am a huge Bonapartist. I support the Napoleonic code, the establishment of a pan-European Empire under French leadership, and the destruction of the Holy Roman Empire and the reorganization of the German States as the Confederation of the Rhine. Napoleon himself, however, I abhor. While he led from the front, repeatedly risking his life...
  • @Trinity
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    IF Mr. H is in Hell, he is joined by Stalin, FDR, Churchill and countless lying Jews. Lol. And that would be a lot of murdering as well as lying Jews who orchestrated the death of tens of millions of Whites killing each other Whites in two World Wars.

    Never Forget 911
    5 Dancing Shlomos

    Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert, @Passing by

    “…IF Mr. H is in Hell, he is joined by Stalin, FDR, Churchill and countless lying Jews…”

    Well, not for nothing Satan’s motto is “Diversity is strength”.

    •ï¿½LOL: Trinity
  • @anon
    I think it all comes down to money. We can argue about the particulars of ww2 till the cows come home. It is still about money and WHO controls the money supply. Lincoln printed money, they killed him, Hitler printed money, they killed him, Kennedy printed money, they killed him. Financial sovereignty is strictly forbidden in this "enlightened" world we live in. Hmm.

    Replies: @Half Norwegian

    Kennedy was a massive jewlover and posed zero threat to their money power. Sickening how many of you alt media retards craft these elaborate fanfics worshipping that scumbag.

    •ï¿½Replies: @anon
    @Half Norwegian

    Half norwegian? I wonder what the other half is. I never said I was a fan of Kennedy, only pointing out the fact that he joined others who had the temerity to print money. As for the alt media claim, are you saying you trust the msm more? Kennedy was a jew lover? Have you met his father? The jews hated Kennedys guts, you retard. From now on when you use the term retard maybe you should look in the mirror.
  • After reading the diatribes here on Unz by “Richard Parker” and “Gregory Conte,” my opinion is that it’s too bad that the Nazis surrendered to the allies before the atomic bomb was ready for use. The bombs would have cleansed the evil in the Teutonic soul with atomic fire.

  • When someone is offended by the term Aryan, I know immediately that they’re brown and disgusting, or even worse, a libertarian.

    •ï¿½LOL: Cloverleaf
  • @Passing by

    But from a geostrategic viewpoint, it is very clear what Germany had to do: bring German-speaking populations isolated by the Versailles treaty back into the Reich and win territory in the East in order to have the agricultural-demographic base to compete with the United States (see especially Adam Tooze The Wages of Destruction).
    �
    And let's dispose of the Slavs who lived on that territory thousands of years before any German set foot there. After all, Slavs are untermenschen.

    The fact remains that it was 70 million Germans and a few thousand noble Romanians, Italians, Hungarians, Finns, Frenchmen, Scandinavians and others who stood up to Jewish power
    �
    None of those noble people stood to Jewish power, they signed up with the Axis team because they wanted their neighbours' land. How noble is that?

    In Mein Kampf, Hitler points out that no political movement can afford to disregard the example of a great hero.
    �
    Mein Kampf is the work of a sociopath, and I don't mean arguably, I mean provably.

    Good people die in war. That is how it goes. How does the death of a good German officer besmirch the leadership of Adolf Hitler?
    �
    By having all idealistic valiant men die and grifting cowards survive? When only von der Leyen's, Baerbock's, Scholz's, Merz's, Schwab's - a half-Nazi, half-Jew btw - grandparents / parents survive, you get Ursula, Annalena, Olaf, Friedrich, Klaus. It's friggin' elementary logic.

    Some readers might regard my tone as overly personal.
    �
    It's actually the same tone as, what was the name of the guy who penned an hagiography of Monsanto and Big Pharma then went to insult commenters who disagreed on this site some time ago? You're not that different from Jews you see.

    And finally, my favourite:

    The author’s pretense of caring about the Slavs is a pose.
    �
    I'll grant you that you're almost honest about it. Almost because you dare not say openly what you really think about Slavs. But your omission of Slovaks on your list of Germany's allies that I quoted above speaks of itself. Funny also that you included Scandinavians, apart from Quisling I don't see whom you have in mind, and omitted the Balts, the only people with actually somewhat legitimate grievances against Russia. Or did you perhaps confuse the former with the latter?

    Replies: @Odyssey, @Franklin Ryckaert, @Poupon Marx

    “And the winner of veracity and veritas is ……envelope, please….Mr. Parker!

  • Gustav says:
    @ok_boomer
    @anonymous

    "In citing Hitler’s supposed dastardly designs on the Slavs the defenders of the mainstream “Hitler Bad!†discourse typically reach first for Generalplan Ost, but what one finds upon closer inspection of this supposed villainous German master-plan is hardly any concrete policy at all, but merely a series of drafts, proposals and amendments to drafts and proposals, some of which were more or less practical, ethical and serious than others but none of which were remotely final or definitive."


    Hahahaha. "But... but the papers didn't say so. Look, it says so here on this paper." The audacity of some of you is truly staggering. Let's look at what the Nazis did, not what the papers say. For example, Belarus:


    Between 1941 and 1944, it is estimated that the Wehrmacht, along with the Nazi regime's SS forces and local collaborators, wiped out over 5,000 villages in Belarus. This destruction was part of the broader strategy of terror, involving mass executions, forced labor, and the systematic annihilation of civilian populations, especially those suspected of supporting the Soviet resistance. Many villages were set on fire, and their inhabitants were killed or sent to labor camps.

    The total number of people who perished in Belarus during the German occupation in World War II is estimated to be around 2.2 million people. This includes both military and civilian casualties and encompasses a variety of horrific events:

    Jews: Approximately 800,000 Jews were killed during the Holocaust in Belarus, either through mass executions, deportation to concentration camps, or death in the ghettos.

    Civilians: In addition to the Jewish victims, many non-Jewish Belarusians also suffered from mass executions, forced labor, starvation, and other forms of violence. An estimated 1.5 million civilians died as a result of the war and occupation, including those killed in the widespread destruction of villages.

    Soviet POWs: Many Soviet prisoners of war (POWs) were also held by the Germans, with large numbers of them dying in camps or through execution.

    Replies: @Gustav

    It sounds like there was a war, as wars generally are. What do they want to tell us? That the wars of other peoples were bloodless? Just read what the soldiers of the North did to their brothers in the South. And about the Jews: have you ever looked at Gaza? Or read about how the Jews killed millions of Christian Russians after the revolution in Russia? Without war? Go shit, as the Viennese say!

  • @Odyssey
    @Odyssey

    Achtung - Panzers!
    (by Heinz Guderian)

    Aryans? LOL. Germans were neither Aryans nor Goths.

    Who were the Aryans?
    What does the term 'German' mean?

    Replies: @eah, @Poupon Marx

    When someone uses the term “Aryans”, I know immediately the person is not well educated, has a genetic chip on his shoulder (imputed superiority due to genes alone), and a mediocre and capped intelligence [no Flynn effect].

  • a “grand council†of National Socialist leaders could have averted war

    Sure, I am eliminating some context from the quote by not including preceding and following words. The quote is purely misleading in itself. In Italy, precisely that kind of ‘grand council’ of the Fascist Party was convened.

    They deposed Mussolini but were outmanouevred by General Badoglio and the King, who in turn deposed them. This ‘Parker’ surely knows of the results of that foolish ‘grand council’.

    One of my favourite accounts of those times was in a memoir by an Italian diplomat. Suddenly, he was thrown from diplomatic ‘high society’ in Tokyo to internment in Karuizawa. At first, it was quite comfortable, but after a year, it became very deprived.

    He wasn’t a fool, he realised that everyone, the other internees, the guards, the people, were all suffering, and understood that he was being treated as well as was possible.

  • ANON[347] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:

    In reply to Franklin Ryckaert’s comment: #comment-7050589

    Franklin, respectfully of you and your quotations from Wikipedia,

    I assume you are aware that Wikipedia is universally regarded as, on political matters, a highly biased source. Certainly everyone who is right-of-center regards it as such.

    For an example of its bias I encourage you to read Donald Trump’s Wikipedia page. Or see this long-running Hoax.[1]

    So why would you, on this one (you must admit) highly politically contentious matter – perhaps *the* most contentious matter – treat Wikipedia as a reliable source, and shrug off and belittle the concerns that others would have about Wikipedia? Why would you do that? Because, perhaps, in this particular instance, Wikipedia happens to agree with and reinforce your own preconceptions of what WWII and Hitler were – preconceptions put in your head alongside your childhood breakfast Cheerios by the Jewish TeeVee?

    I encourage you to read what Karl Radl (he’s on Substack and Twitter) has written on these subjects if you want to begin to deprogram yourself of your brainwashing.[2][3]

    Do you also regard Schindler’s List, Life is Beautiful and Band of Brothers as documentaries – as so many of the low-information believers in the mainstream WWII narrative seem to?

    [1]
    Or you should read about The Longest Hoax in Wikipedia History in which, for 15 years, Wikipedia claimed that 200,000 Poles had been exterminated in a German death camp which never existed and was only corrected in 2019 because an Israeli research was unhappy that the Poles were getting in on the Jewish Holocaust grift. It makes you wonder what other “15 year”(!) plus hoaxes are running on Wikipedia right now but for which there is no incentive to correct because they’re regarded to be politically useful, like this one was.

    https://ia801404.us.archive.org/8/items/haaretz-the-fake-nazi-death-camp-wikipedias-longest-hoax-exposed/Haaretz_The_Fake_Nazi_Death_Camp_Wikipedia%E2%80%99s_Longest_Hoax%2C_Exposed.pdf

    [2][3]
    https://twitter.com/KarlRadl
    https://karlradl14.substack.com

    •ï¿½Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
    @ANON

    Actually the fact that that hoax by Polish nationalists could last for 15 years, shows that Jews don't control Wikipedia completely.
  • anon[517] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:

    I think it all comes down to money. We can argue about the particulars of ww2 till the cows come home. It is still about money and WHO controls the money supply. Lincoln printed money, they killed him, Hitler printed money, they killed him, Kennedy printed money, they killed him. Financial sovereignty is strictly forbidden in this “enlightened” world we live in. Hmm.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Half Norwegian
    @anon

    Kennedy was a massive jewlover and posed zero threat to their money power. Sickening how many of you alt media retards craft these elaborate fanfics worshipping that scumbag.

    Replies: @anon
  • @Gustav
    @Protogonus

    Please read this book:
    https://archive.org/details/KommHeimInsReich

    Replies: @Protogonus

    Summarize the point, why don’t you? Are you capable?

  • @Carlton Meyer
    After the British naval blockade starved the Germans during World War I and forced them to accept the Allies demands in 1919, it is not surprising that Hitler and Germans wanted "living space" to the east to provide more food for Germany, much of it formerly part of the Germanic Austro-Hungary Empire. Millions of Germans had migrated east to not really Polish or Russian lands, but the sparsely populated region of Ukraine that had a warmer climate and rich soil. These were known as Black Sea Germans.

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/15/Deutsche_Siedlungsgebiete_in_Osteuropa_1925.jpg

    So it wasn't that Germans were crazy about conquering new lands to the east, but wanted farmland in their ancient "homeland" as this region was once populated by "Goth" Germans.

    https://youtu.be/bqbgQvlKSeA?t=1574

    Replies: @Poupon Marx

    Oh, come, come Carlton. The Zionists use the same argument for Palestine. Remember the movie, “Exodus”? And the song, “God gave this land to me”. There was NO Christian objection in the JUSA at the time. I was just a kid and wondered about the phoniness of this claim. Any attempt to question the Bible Thumpers around me proved to be a brick wall.

    Jews have commanded Goys for a 2000 years, and for the greatest part, they have willingly complied and obeyed their masters.

  • @Punchthem
    Can somebody explain why AIPAC and ADL are not doing their job in case of UNZ.com ?

    Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert

    “…Can somebody explain why AIPAC and ADL are not doing their job in case of UNZ.com ..?”

    Answer: conspiracy of silence.

  • Hitler is the biggest idiot to rule Germany which would have become a World Power but instead turned into a vassal State occupied by the US military today.

  • @Franklin Ryckaert
    @Passing by

    Here it's about time to add some links to articles about Nazi behavior towards Slavs:

    1) The Barbarossa Decree: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbarossa_decree

    Excerpt:

    "...The decree declared that the upcoming Operation Barbarossa, the invasion of the Soviet Union, would be a war of extermination and endorsed war crimes against Soviet civilians.

    The Barbarossa decree was laid out by Adolf Hitler during a high-level meeting with military officials on 30 March 1941, where he declared the political and intellectual elites of the Soviet Union would be eradicated by German forces, in order to ensure a long-lasting German victory..."
    �
    2) Nazi war crimes in Poland: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_crimes_in_occupied_Poland_during_World_War_II War_II

    Too much to excerpt. Read the whole article.

    3) The Hunger Plan: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunger_Plan

    Excerpt:

    "...As part of the plan, Nazi military forces were ordered to capture food stocks in occupied territories, redirect them to supply German troops and fuel the German war economy.[2][3] In addition to the extensive exploitation of resources to support the German war economy, the Hunger Plan intended to create an artificial famine in Eastern Europe, which would have resulted in deaths of around 31 to 45 million inhabitants through forced starvation..."
    �
    4) Nazi kidnap of blond children: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kidnapping_of_children_by_Nazi_Germany

    Blond children in Poland were kidnapped in order to "germanize" them. Those kidnapped children, who on closer inspection didn't meet the racial standards, were murdered.

    Of course the Nazitards will now howl that all those articles are from Wikipedia and thus automatically untrue, in order to keep their faith in "Saint" Adolf.

    I have bad news for them: "Saint" Adolf is in hell. Here is a picture of his:

    https://storage.fabulae.ru/images/authors/4364/foto_35159.jpg

    Replies: @Trinity

    IF Mr. H is in Hell, he is joined by Stalin, FDR, Churchill and countless lying Jews. Lol. And that would be a lot of murdering as well as lying Jews who orchestrated the death of tens of millions of Whites killing each other Whites in two World Wars.

    Never Forget 911
    5 Dancing Shlomos

    •ï¿½Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
    @Trinity

    "...IF Mr. H is in Hell, he is joined by Stalin, FDR, Churchill and countless lying Jews..."

    Well, not for nothing Satan's motto is "Diversity is strength".
    , @Passing by
    @Trinity

    They all deserved to burn in hell. Having bad guys on one side doesn't necessarily mean that good guys are on the opposite. The opposite of good is evil, the opposite of virtue is sin, the opposite of truth is a lie, but the opposite of evil can also be evil, the opposite of sin can also be sin and the opposite of a lie can also be a lie.

    Replies: @Trinity
  • @Protogonus
    Chancellor Hitler’s NSDAP put itself in place of the Prussian Monarchy instead of using its electoral victory in 1933 to place the chancellor’s office at the service of the King of Prussia, who was then still living in abdication outside the country (he died of natural causes in 1941).

    It would have been wisest for William II to commit martial suicide in 1918 so as to enable fresh leadership of Germany by the Prussian Crown Prince. And if Chancellor Hitler had had the best interests of Germany in mind, this is what he should have advocated in 1933.

    Instead, the new Chancellor in all his public orations for twelve years misleadingly displayed the symbols of Royal Power in a glass display case next to the podium in order to construct fake “Third Reich†propaganda for his anti-monarchical regime.

    The NSDAP’s “national socialist†regime was fatally flawed from the start, since at any moment, should the chancellor die unexpectedly, a "Kronrat" (Crown Council) would have to choose a new Führer and thereby unavoidably unleash a destructive Politburo-like struggle for power.

    As for what actually happened (1933-1945), Unz.Com readers surely know that THERE WERE NO GAS CHAMBERS. The Hebrews in the concentration camps were not murdered but gradually starved from the effects of British carpet-bombing–a true War Crime that was never prosecuted.

    Another War Crime was Gen. Eisenhower’s post-war brutality against German POWs, a million of whom died of exposure in mid-winter (1945-46) according to his orders, which were contrary to the Geneva Conventions. The Kangaroo Court known as the Nuremberg Trial was shortly to follow.

    Replies: @Gustav
    •ï¿½Replies: @Protogonus
    @Gustav

    Summarize the point, why don't you? Are you capable?
  • @europeasant
    Pissing off your neighbors by killing thousands of them and destroying their cities is no way to make friends. In fact you have just created mortal enemies who will retaliate and destroy you. Most people just want to live life, eat drink and be merry. But now by killing many of them you have just pissed off quite of few of these people and will pay the price. Besides, calling them "Untermenschen" is no way to make friends.

    Nationalism is fine. Just keep it within your own borders. If Hitler tried to invade my personal property I'd bitch slap him till he came to his senses.

    That's probably why Europe is in such a sad state today. Millions of Europeans killed. Europe united is how European people will survive in a world with rapidly changing demographics.

    Replies: @Kilmore Trotter, @HdC

    If the EU is what you mean by “united” Europe then thank you very much and good bye. EU supports all the stuff that makes immigration issues more of an issue, its green deal plan chokes member states’ economies, its foreign policy is Russophobic beyond comprehension and self-preservation.

    Demographics changes you refer to conflate two very different topics:

    a) You cannot run a nanny state whose borders are not tightly shut.

    b) More importantly, the very phrase “changing demographics” is grossly misleading one. What needs to be said aloud is the following: Healthy women should have three children or more, that’s the norm. Without children all the other issues and debates lose most of their urgency and importance. Why worry about future if not for somebody to live it we can relate to?

  • @Rob misek

    But from a geostrategic viewpoint, it is very clear what Germany had to do: bring German-speaking populations isolated by the Versailles treaty
    �
    Germany had to respond to far more pressing issues than the Treaty of Versailles. Its only choice was to capitulate to Zionists, like Trump, or survive.

    Jews Globally boycotted Germany in 1933 to intentionally and successfully drive Germany and the world into WW2.

    These are properly referenced quotes from Jewish leaders demonstrating that they had intended to create and force Germany into WW2.

    Now Jews are committing a holocaust in Gaza.

    “We Jews are going to bring a war on Germanyâ€. David A Brown, national chairman, united Jewish campaign, 1934.

    “The Israeli people around the world declare economic and financial war against Germany …holy war against Hitlers peopleâ€

    Chaim Weismann, the Zionist leader, 8 September 1939, Jewish chronicle.

    The Toronto evening telegram of 26 February 1940 quoted rabbi Maurice l. Perlzweig of the world Jewish Congress as telling a Canadian audience that†The world Jewish Congress has been at war with Germany for seven yearsâ€.

    Jews/zionists stole Palestine in 1948 beginning the Middle East conflict, terrorizing and oppressing Palestinians with crimes against humanity in an apartheid state. Jews are now committing a holocaust in Gaza. Trump is supporting them.

    Replies: @Rob misek

    Look at the table of the economic impact of Jewish boycotts against Germany between 1929 and 1933 for the US alone.

    Then consider the total impact on Germany as Jews coordinated the same boycotts against Germany globally

    And tell me Jews didn’t create WW2.

    http://www.hist-chron.com/judentum-aktenlage/hol/EncJud_boycotts02-ENGL-anti-Nazi.html#:~:text=Boycotts%2002%3A%20Jewish%20boycott%20movements%20against%20the%20Third,anti-Nazi%3B%20Encyclopaedia%20Judaica%201971%2C%20vol.%204%2C%20col.%201280-1282

  • @onebornfree
    Heh! "National" Socialism?🤣

    Oh gawd. Call it what you will.

    Reality Fact:

    It ( National Socialism) is just another convenient, obfuscating term for yet another coercively enforced, top down, fantasy control system to run everyones lives, and to systematically make everyone outside of the rulers and their "private", outsider sycophants poorer and far less free, essentially no different from the collectivist, top down fantasies of communism, democracy, Zionism, or whatever. ðŸ˜

    "Among its many disguises, socialism cloaks itself in the mantle of ideals that many people value such as the ideals of justice and equality before the law."

    From:"The Many Disguises of Socialism":
    https://mises.org/mises-wire/many-disguises-socialism

    Regards, onebornfree

    Replies: @Gustav

    Das Mises Jude war, wissen sie aber schon? Und der Preußische Sozialismus ist etwa ganz anderes, als der von Juden erfundene Sozialismus, der nur ablenken soll. Lesen sie Spengler und nicht die Judenpresse!

    •ï¿½Agree: Hinz
  • @Chris Moore

    Not only is Mr. Parker woefully uninformed about the war-thirsty nature of International Jewish Financial Power, he blames Hitler for not being able to win a war against the four strongest world-powers. He goes on to reveal his complete ignorance of actual National Socialist ideology through emotionally manipulative and counter-factual arguments.
    �
    Nonsense. Putin has shown how to handle the jews and their stooges, and save his nation against the full weight of the Zionist and Judeofascist onslaught. He's proven it can be done. Additionally, Adlolf Shiklegruber was a Judeofascist hothead himself, programmed by his own Satanic background to lead Germany to destruction, and then commit suicide, which is exactly what he did. The proof is in the pudding.

    Replies: @Poupon Marx

    He was highly manipulated from the start. Scoreboard: Jews, -1, Germans and other Caucasians, -20.

    Jews win, again, and keep on winning, through guilt, manipulation, lies, and deception. “He who shall not be named”.

  • @Odyssey
    @Passing by

    He also did not mention the noble Croatian Ustashas, who were also sent to the Eastern Front. About 160K Romanian Shirley Impalers left their noble bones under Stalingrad. Hitler consciously sacrificed Von Pauwels' army under Stalingrad, knowing that none would return. If he had withdrawn those million soldiers to some defensive positions in e.g. Poland or the German border, the Russians would not have been able to defeat them because they would have had ten times the casualties. What a mentally ill person. Only those who adore him more than Kim Jong Un are sicker than him.

    Replies: @Passing by

    Yes, I noticed his omission of those really fine folks whose barbarity is only matched by that of Western-backed Islamic radicals in the Middle-East but given that I’m Serb, if I had mentioned them, nazitards would have said that I’m biased so I intentionally omitted them.

  • eah says:
    @Odyssey
    @Odyssey

    Achtung - Panzers!
    (by Heinz Guderian)

    Aryans? LOL. Germans were neither Aryans nor Goths.

    Who were the Aryans?
    What does the term 'German' mean?

    Replies: @eah, @Poupon Marx

    >What does the term ‘German’ mean?

    It refers to an ethnic group — ethnic Germans or their interests — for a person, it means someone who is biodeutsch — a member of an identifiable Volksgemeinschaft — a typical (ethnic) German can be identified by phenotype (völkisch-ness), language, cultural practices, etc — you know one when you see and hear one.

    Someone who asks a question like this generally does so rhetorically — it seems they are trying to signal that they are, in contrast to the rubes, a member of some sort of cognoscenti.

    In an informal context like this, it’s pointless and stupid — it’s clear what is meant by German.

  • Hinz says:
    @Obersturmbannführer

    I don’t know who Mr. Parker is. Nobody does. For all I know, he could be a Jew. If so, I find his article encouraging. It means that the Jews feel their power threatened by National Socialism, so much so, that they have resorted to posing as National Socialists to undermine our morale and solidarity.
    �
    Several of my comments in Parker's thread at UR were blocked. I believe it was Parker, not Ron Unz, who blocked them. My last blocked comment was a thorough debunk of his exaggerations and lies about Dirlewanger. If anyone else had comments blocked on Parker's thread, I would be interested to know.

    I think that Parker is some kind of limited hangout or, as Cass Sunstein told us, an agent of "nudge". He is trying to "nudge" the alt-right away from discussions about Jewish depravity and sadism, and towards discussions about the foibles and shortcomings of the NSDAP, Germany and Germans in general.

    Replies: @Hinz, @Poupon Marx, @Obersturmbannführer

    He’s likely part of Israels twentyfold increased Hasbara spending.
    Just a paid liar.

    https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hasbara

    “Hasbara Increase
    In November 2024, the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs increased its budget for hasbara, or public diplomacy, by 20 times as part of a coalition agreement with Gideon Sa’ar.
    This significant funding boost is aimed at reinforcing Israel’s narrative internationally, particularly in justifying its actions in Gaza and framing Palestinian resistance as anti-Semitic and equivalent to Nazi terrorism.”

  • @Stephen Paul Foster

    I don’t know who Mr. Parker is.
    �
    I don't know who Mr. Conte is, but after reading this rant, I have serious reservations about the clinical stability of the author --

    As one of the only public National Socialists in the world, I can say that Mr. Parker does not understand the first thing about National Socialist ideology.
    �
    The "world," no less. This seems to shout: "Up the Thorazine!"

    Replies: @Poupon Marx, @V. K. Ovelund

    And a bucket of water to the face. This guy has some screws loose. For the “Third Way”, look at V. V. Putin and Russia in 1991. VV is not impulsive or given over to foaming at the mouth speeches and a constant diet of uppers and downer to treat his mental condition and psychosomatic symptoms. VV is a genius, a renaissance man, with Time and Grade in positions of power [He made his bones, before].
    Putin shows what intelligence and wisdom can do, modulated with experience.

    Hitler treated Germany like a machine shop project, to be finished in record time. A rush job, feverish, and breathless. A little man with a massive inferiority complex. I’m so tired of school boys like this author, shallow and idol worship. See my comments archived on C. G. Jung, who say through Hitler and the pathology and vulnerabilities of the German Collective Conscious in the 1930s.

    This article and the comments are shallow and two dimensional. Machine function only.

  • @Passing by

    But from a geostrategic viewpoint, it is very clear what Germany had to do: bring German-speaking populations isolated by the Versailles treaty back into the Reich and win territory in the East in order to have the agricultural-demographic base to compete with the United States (see especially Adam Tooze The Wages of Destruction).
    �
    And let's dispose of the Slavs who lived on that territory thousands of years before any German set foot there. After all, Slavs are untermenschen.

    The fact remains that it was 70 million Germans and a few thousand noble Romanians, Italians, Hungarians, Finns, Frenchmen, Scandinavians and others who stood up to Jewish power
    �
    None of those noble people stood to Jewish power, they signed up with the Axis team because they wanted their neighbours' land. How noble is that?

    In Mein Kampf, Hitler points out that no political movement can afford to disregard the example of a great hero.
    �
    Mein Kampf is the work of a sociopath, and I don't mean arguably, I mean provably.

    Good people die in war. That is how it goes. How does the death of a good German officer besmirch the leadership of Adolf Hitler?
    �
    By having all idealistic valiant men die and grifting cowards survive? When only von der Leyen's, Baerbock's, Scholz's, Merz's, Schwab's - a half-Nazi, half-Jew btw - grandparents / parents survive, you get Ursula, Annalena, Olaf, Friedrich, Klaus. It's friggin' elementary logic.

    Some readers might regard my tone as overly personal.
    �
    It's actually the same tone as, what was the name of the guy who penned an hagiography of Monsanto and Big Pharma then went to insult commenters who disagreed on this site some time ago? You're not that different from Jews you see.

    And finally, my favourite:

    The author’s pretense of caring about the Slavs is a pose.
    �
    I'll grant you that you're almost honest about it. Almost because you dare not say openly what you really think about Slavs. But your omission of Slovaks on your list of Germany's allies that I quoted above speaks of itself. Funny also that you included Scandinavians, apart from Quisling I don't see whom you have in mind, and omitted the Balts, the only people with actually somewhat legitimate grievances against Russia. Or did you perhaps confuse the former with the latter?

    Replies: @Odyssey, @Franklin Ryckaert, @Poupon Marx

    Here it’s about time to add some links to articles about Nazi behavior towards Slavs:

    1) The Barbarossa Decree: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbarossa_decree

    Excerpt:

    “…The decree declared that the upcoming Operation Barbarossa, the invasion of the Soviet Union, would be a war of extermination and endorsed war crimes against Soviet civilians.

    The Barbarossa decree was laid out by Adolf Hitler during a high-level meeting with military officials on 30 March 1941, where he declared the political and intellectual elites of the Soviet Union would be eradicated by German forces, in order to ensure a long-lasting German victory…”

    2) Nazi war crimes in Poland: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_crimes_in_occupied_Poland_during_World_War_II War_II

    Too much to excerpt. Read the whole article.

    3) The Hunger Plan: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunger_Plan

    Excerpt:

    “…As part of the plan, Nazi military forces were ordered to capture food stocks in occupied territories, redirect them to supply German troops and fuel the German war economy.[2][3] In addition to the extensive exploitation of resources to support the German war economy, the Hunger Plan intended to create an artificial famine in Eastern Europe, which would have resulted in deaths of around 31 to 45 million inhabitants through forced starvation…”

    4) Nazi kidnap of blond children: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kidnapping_of_children_by_Nazi_Germany

    Blond children in Poland were kidnapped in order to “germanize” them. Those kidnapped children, who on closer inspection didn’t meet the racial standards, were murdered.

    Of course the Nazitards will now howl that all those articles are from Wikipedia and thus automatically untrue, in order to keep their faith in “Saint” Adolf.

    I have bad news for them: “Saint” Adolf is in hell. Here is a picture of his:

    •ï¿½Thanks: Passing by
    •ï¿½Troll: HT
    •ï¿½Replies: @Trinity
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    IF Mr. H is in Hell, he is joined by Stalin, FDR, Churchill and countless lying Jews. Lol. And that would be a lot of murdering as well as lying Jews who orchestrated the death of tens of millions of Whites killing each other Whites in two World Wars.

    Never Forget 911
    5 Dancing Shlomos

    Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert, @Passing by
  • geokat62 says:
    @Richard Parker
    Mr Conte,

    My, my–what a contemptible, rambling screed that really does not warrant a response, but here goes—for the chuckles. A few things.
    You did not even get my pen name correct. Thank you of course to Dr. MacDonald for correcting this error. Receipt:
    https://archive.is/VnNkb
    This suggests you are wrong about much more besides, which of course you are. A few things stuck out, First, this ridiculous statement:

    “As for tactics: Hitler was right more often than he was wrong.â€

    It is surprising to think you were a private school teacher, before getting double crossed by Richard Spencer and all that. Everyone knows, yourself excepted it seems, that just above 50 percent accuracy is a failing grade, which is of course evidenced by the catastrophic ruin and defeat that resulted from the various strategic and tactical blunders. A ruin and defeat that probably exceeds that of even the 30 Years, the consequences neither Germany nor Europe are likely to overcome in the long-term, final analysis.
    As for soldiers being there to die on a whim, due to easily avoidable catastrophic blunders and poor decision making, Hitler said the same. Many of his best generals and officers–men far better than you, sir– were rightly outragedvt it, and that admission on your part only bolsters precisely what my essay asserts.
    Then there is this gem:

    “I could go through and refute every one of his absurd claims about the declaration of war on America or Hitler’s Eastern policies but that would be a waste of time.â€

    Except you did not, because you cannot, no one can. The war losing blunders I have set forth are incontrovertible, historical fact.
    I must say the peppering of “you†in this pitiful diatribe does amuse me. To think someone would pretend, but only pretend, to have the barest semblance of a classical education, and yet violate a fundamental maxim of composition and writing: do not write in second person. Even in the degraded American education system, most learn this at about the ninth grade.
    Finally, as for who I am… I can assure you I am not Jewish. As for what I have written here, it is readily available in the archive feature.
    https://www.unz.com/author/richard-parker/
    Some pieces have also been featured on counter-currents. Most all recent written work is available on my humble little publication, The Raven’s Call: A Reactionary Perspective, available at theravenscall.substack.com

    Replies: @Lackadaisical Reader, @geokat62

    Care to respond to this?

    Telegram comment posted by Joel Davis:

    An important point on the doctrine of ‘Lebensraum’ from Brendan Simms

    Hitler did not primarily justify the quest for Lebensraum with the inherent inferiority of the Slav population there, as an ideological war against Bolshevism, or even as a first step towards the annihilation of the Jews in Europe. His main motive was that Germany, weak herself, would in his view have to colonize her even weaker neighbour before she was herself completely enslaved. Hitler targeted the Soviet Union not so much for what it was (ideologically), as for where it lay (geographically). There was, so to speak, nothing personal about it.

    His aim throughout was not world domination, but simple national survival. There was, Hitler averred, no room for half-measures. Germany would have to be a world power, or she would go completely under. The half-measures and restraint of Bismarck’s times, he argued, were outdated in a world of global empires. ‘Germany will either be a world power or nothing,’ Hitler wrote, ‘but to be a world power one needs the necessary size.’ This meant, he concluded, that ‘the German people will only be able to guarantee their future through world power’. Hitler did not envisage ‘world domination’ by Germany, as opposed to the ‘world power’ status necessary for her very survival.

    The driving force behind Hitler’s strategy in the mid 1920s, as in the period immediately after the First World War, remained fear and admiration of Anglo-America. Lebensraum in the east would kill two birds with one stone. First, it would provide Germany with the critical territorial mass necessary to balance the American Union and the British Empire, and to some extent that of France as well. Secondly, eastward expansion would secure the raw materials and especially the farmland necessary to feed the German demographic surplus. Eastern colonization was the answer to pernicious transatlantic and antipodean migration. Hitler was proposing to strike east, but he was really looking west.

    The idea was simply to make Germany a superpower on the level of America, to resist being subjugated. Either become a superpower, or become a superpower’s bitch – this was the equation Hitler saw and he chose the former. It wasn’t “chauvinism” or “Nordicism” that fundamentally motivated Hitler’s imperialism, it was cold hard realism.

    https://t.me/joeldavis_x/1268

  • Gustav says:

    Human culture and civilization on this continent are inextricably linked to the existence of the Aryan. Its extinction or extinction will once again lower the dark veil of a cultureless time on this globe.
    The undermining of the existence of human culture through the destruction of its bearer, however, appears in the eyes of a völkisch world view as the most cursable crime. Whoever dares to lay his hand on the highest image of the Lord commits an outrage against the benevolent Creator of this miracle and helps to expel him from paradise. Thus the national world view corresponds to the innermost will of nature, since it re-establishes that free play of forces which must lead to a permanent mutual up-breeding, until finally the best humanity, through the acquired possession of this earth, is given free rein for activity in areas which will lie partly above and partly beyond it. We all suspect that in the distant future man may be confronted with problems which only a supreme race as a master race, supported by the means and possibilities of an entire globe, will be called upon to solve.

    Adolf Hitler

    Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

  • Thank God Hitler was defeated. Can you imagine not having hundreds of thousand Muslims turning Germany into Dar Al-Islam? Isn’t that what Germany wants? What the EU wants? Oh wait,, I’m confused.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
    @The Last Adam

    You don't need a Hitler to avoid mass non-white immigration into your country. Ask the Hungarians about Viktor Orban. (Or ask the German party of AfD).

    Replies: @Poupon Marx
  • Bama says:

    How many decades, or even centuries, of lost lives and uprooted people will it take to know Jewish intentions for all others? When does the time finally arrive to see through their victimhood and propaganda? When is it right to see those who support Jewish doings as the same enemy?

  • But from a geostrategic viewpoint, it is very clear what Germany had to do: bring German-speaking populations isolated by the Versailles treaty

    Germany had to respond to far more pressing issues than the Treaty of Versailles. Its only choice was to capitulate to Zionists, like Trump, or survive.

    Jews Globally boycotted Germany in 1933 to intentionally and successfully drive Germany and the world into WW2.

    These are properly referenced quotes from Jewish leaders demonstrating that they had intended to create and force Germany into WW2.

    Now Jews are committing a holocaust in Gaza.

    “We Jews are going to bring a war on Germanyâ€. David A Brown, national chairman, united Jewish campaign, 1934.

    “The Israeli people around the world declare economic and financial war against Germany …holy war against Hitlers peopleâ€

    Chaim Weismann, the Zionist leader, 8 September 1939, Jewish chronicle.

    The Toronto evening telegram of 26 February 1940 quoted rabbi Maurice l. Perlzweig of the world Jewish Congress as telling a Canadian audience that†The world Jewish Congress has been at war with Germany for seven yearsâ€.

    Jews/zionists stole Palestine in 1948 beginning the Middle East conflict, terrorizing and oppressing Palestinians with crimes against humanity in an apartheid state. Jews are now committing a holocaust in Gaza. Trump is supporting them.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Rob misek
    @Rob misek

    Look at the table of the economic impact of Jewish boycotts against Germany between 1929 and 1933 for the US alone.

    Then consider the total impact on Germany as Jews coordinated the same boycotts against Germany globally

    And tell me Jews didn’t create WW2.


    http://www.hist-chron.com/judentum-aktenlage/hol/EncJud_boycotts02-ENGL-anti-Nazi.html#:~:text=Boycotts%2002%3A%20Jewish%20boycott%20movements%20against%20the%20Third,anti-Nazi%3B%20Encyclopaedia%20Judaica%201971%2C%20vol.%204%2C%20col.%201280-1282
  • I can hardly feel any sympathy for Nazi cause or the person of A.H, for I am one of those Slavs who would have been robbed of their own homes and country. After Munich Czechs were toeing the line, allowing them to administer their own affairs while being part of a larger state would have been mere return to the situation before 1918. Bohemia and Moravia had always been attached to the empire of Germans in one way or the other. Sometimes local kings were emperors themselves, or the emperors were also Czech kings (as in case of Habsburg dynasty). It would have been the safest course of action to return to this arrangement and avoid direct annexation, mandatory usage of German in public affairs, establishing Gestapo offices in the country, or killing off and razing entire villages because of specific partisan attacks. Establishment of the Protektorat was inexcusably stupid move that moved Czechs to hate Germans and support the exile government in London.

    And the very same can be said about Slavs in the annexed Soviet territories. Had a reasonable postwar arrangement including restoration of Russian empire and orthodox church been formulated the war would never have become existential struggle for most of the Soviet population. Yet Germany could have obtained substantial territories in the East exactly as was the plan, only the plan would have to be put into effect after victorious war, the way it was done to Poland by Allies.

    However, Hitler and his party could not really make themselves to fashion their conquest this way. Hitler’s idea of history was that of struggle of nations, he also had clear notion of hierarchy of nations and would not really take wishes and feelings of lower races into account, even if for reasons of political and military expediency. Disastrous results were inevitable consequence of these Nazi axioms. That’s certain, even though we cannot say with the same certainty whether a more clever approach would have been enough to tilt the scales in Reich’s favour.

    •ï¿½Replies: @craicaassmofo
    @Kilmore Trotter

    German ego. Most of them have it. AH channeled it into a war against the Eastern Aryan world.

    The only thing that can contain the German/Germanic/Nordic ego is to box them in in their homelands. They can never be allowed to expand.

    Just like was done to the Japs and the same needs to be done now to the egotistical Chinaman.
  • Rich says:

    Uncle Dolfie’s mistakes have been listed and gone over time and again, Stalingrad, Dunkirk, declaring war on America, etc., etc. In the end, he lost. His failures were the greatest defeat in German history. His actions led to the rape of every female in Germany from 8 to 80. To this day the German people are on their knees to foreign powers and their country is being inundated with non-Germans. His actions. You can love him, if you want, but in my study of the war, a more capable military strategist could have at least fought the allies to a standstill.

  • “Judea Declares War on Germany” began the day Hitler ascended to the position of chancellor. Judea had to. They knew what Hitler pledged as a candidate and they knew it would ultimately be their undoing. Hitler demonstrated what would happen to a modern industrial economy when the parasitic jewish elements were removed from positions of power. Germany suffered an unemployment rate of 30-35% when Hitler took office as opposed to the 22% in the U.S. Within three years Hitler completely eliminated unemployment while FDR, under the thumb of jewish financiers, failed to but slightly dent unemployment for eight years until the engineering of U.S. entry into
    WW II.
    The country that today most resembles in structure that of Hitler’s Germany is China. China has lifted from the misery of poverty a number of people three times the population of the U.S. The jewish propaganda machine has swung into gear vilifying China with the same fervor that was once directed towards Hitler.

    •ï¿½Agree: Lackadaisical Reader, HdC
  • To the shock and dismay of those of a more mainstream, conservative persuasion, many different voices in dissident right, far right, and populist right circles have expressed adulation, admiration, and approval for Adolf Hitler, seemingly without qualification or reservation.[1] Particularly in “Culture as Programming,†I have expressed sympathy for and agreement with much of the...
  • @truthor
    Many, if not most of Mr. Parker’s claims are simply not true except in a simplistic way.

    “These claims [to Danzig and Posen] were ultimately a principal if not the principal catalyst for the outbreak of war when Germany invaded Poland in 1939…â€

    This is untrue as Churchill noted that the cause of the war was the fact that Germany was upsetting the apple cart in its debt free and bartering economy which threatened the international banking system of international Jewry. They recognized immediately that Hitler was their enemy and they had to destroy him, and that was the reason for the 1933 Declaration of War against Germany.

    “And the notion that Austrians are a distinct nationality separate and apart from Germany is somewhat dubious, as the difference in dialect, customs and so on is no more pronounced than certain other regions in Germany…â€

    Very true. One might speak of the Germanies rather than Germany per se. Austria is simply one of the many German states which became divided between the Kingdom of Prussia and the Austrian Empire. Originally the Holy Roman Empire encompassed all the various German states, which fragmented and then were consolidated under either Austrian or Prussian suzerainty. Thus, the anschluss was actually a reunification of the Germanies into the Prussian German State, with its various duchies, principalities, etc. Hitler actually created the modern German state by getting rid of these and making federal states. Of course, Austria was ripped from Germany proper in 1945.

    “The aftermath of the Sudetenland crisis, in which Hitler partitioned the rest of Czechoslovakia between the Reich and a newly formed puppet state of Slovakia in March of 1939, is the first outrage for which Hitler is rightly condemned.â€

    Untrue. The Czech state was a frankenstein multi-ethnic state created by Versailles (much the same as Poland) with German, Czechs, Slovaks, Poles, and Hungarians within it. When Germany saved the persecuted German minority, Poland and Hungary wanted their citizens back as well. Thus The Czech state was collapsing, and did collapse after Slovakia declared their independence. So Czechia asked Hitler to become a Protectorate and did so.

    As Parker notes “Germany did not have legitimate territorial claims on the rest of Czechoslovakia, namely Bohemia and Moravia.†Which is true, but Germany did not absorb Bohemia and Moravia (i.e. Czechia) they accepted it as a German Protectorate which was not subject to German laws, were not drafted, and basically sat the war out in peace.

    So Parker’s conclusions from this “grab†for land bears no truth. Likewise it did not alienate Britain, which had determined to go to war against Germany, but not in 1938 because their defense industry was not yet strong enough.

    “Manstein’s masterstroke, the Sichelschnitt.†It was shown that this was, in fact, Hitler’s plan, but he had trouble selling it to the General Staff. When Manstein presented his plan, which was basically the same as Hitler’s, Hitler could sell it to the General Staff.

    “A pity that such a spectacular victory sowed the seeds of such catastrophic ruin and defeat, largely due to the blunders and shortcomings of Adolf Hitler.â€

    This is untrue. The war was lost, not because of Hitler’s “blunders and shortcomingsâ€, but because of traitors within the nobility who sabotaged Hitler’s plans, poisoned him during the invasion of Russia, and through high treason sold out Germany to the Allies for their pieces of silver. Not to mention some 80 attempts to kill their legitimate leader.

    Mr. Parker should acquaint himself with the work of Prof. Dr. David Hoggan, and modern scholarship on this subject.

    Replies: @Patrick McNally, @The Old Philosopher, @Carolyn Yeager

    Notes:

    This is untrue as Churchill noted that the cause of the war was the fact that Germany was upsetting the apple cart in its debt free and bartering economy which threatened the international banking system of international Jewry. They recognized immediately that Hitler was their enemy and they had to destroy him, and that was the reason for the 1933 Declaration of War against Germany.

    Exactly right on the money.

    It’s probably what prompted the Milner group to reevaluate at the last minute their plot to push Germany into a war with Russia as Quigley recounts the events.

    All anyone has to do to figure out the driving force behind the Brits using Poland as their excuse for launching a war against German is the difference between the condition of Germany’s economy in 21939 and the depression both England and US continued to be mired in as reflected in economic statistics.

    Indeed, the US today under TRump is seeking to turn itself into a variant of national socialism that Hitler proclaimed that is at bottom a union between capitalist corporations and the state. The only real difference is that under Hitler’s national socialism, the national part was the predominant force as reflected by Hitler exercising primary power, whereas in the US it’s the corporate power that predominates.

  • I am a huge Bonapartist. I support the Napoleonic code, the establishment of a pan-European Empire under French leadership, and the destruction of the Holy Roman Empire and the reorganization of the German States as the Confederation of the Rhine. Napoleon himself, however, I abhor. While he led from the front, repeatedly risking his life...
  • Napoleon as a predator, nothing else. At Waterloo, he has been betrayed by a general who was bribed by Rotschild himself, and did not intervene when it was requested. R. could then make a lot of money.

  • @Richard Parker
    Mr Conte,

    My, my–what a contemptible, rambling screed that really does not warrant a response, but here goes—for the chuckles. A few things.
    You did not even get my pen name correct. Thank you of course to Dr. MacDonald for correcting this error. Receipt:
    https://archive.is/VnNkb
    This suggests you are wrong about much more besides, which of course you are. A few things stuck out, First, this ridiculous statement:

    “As for tactics: Hitler was right more often than he was wrong.â€

    It is surprising to think you were a private school teacher, before getting double crossed by Richard Spencer and all that. Everyone knows, yourself excepted it seems, that just above 50 percent accuracy is a failing grade, which is of course evidenced by the catastrophic ruin and defeat that resulted from the various strategic and tactical blunders. A ruin and defeat that probably exceeds that of even the 30 Years, the consequences neither Germany nor Europe are likely to overcome in the long-term, final analysis.
    As for soldiers being there to die on a whim, due to easily avoidable catastrophic blunders and poor decision making, Hitler said the same. Many of his best generals and officers–men far better than you, sir– were rightly outragedvt it, and that admission on your part only bolsters precisely what my essay asserts.
    Then there is this gem:

    “I could go through and refute every one of his absurd claims about the declaration of war on America or Hitler’s Eastern policies but that would be a waste of time.â€

    Except you did not, because you cannot, no one can. The war losing blunders I have set forth are incontrovertible, historical fact.
    I must say the peppering of “you†in this pitiful diatribe does amuse me. To think someone would pretend, but only pretend, to have the barest semblance of a classical education, and yet violate a fundamental maxim of composition and writing: do not write in second person. Even in the degraded American education system, most learn this at about the ninth grade.
    Finally, as for who I am… I can assure you I am not Jewish. As for what I have written here, it is readily available in the archive feature.
    https://www.unz.com/author/richard-parker/
    Some pieces have also been featured on counter-currents. Most all recent written work is available on my humble little publication, The Raven’s Call: A Reactionary Perspective, available at theravenscall.substack.com

    Replies: @Lackadaisical Reader, @geokat62

    Most all recent written work is available on my humble little publication

    You and your publication are anything but humble, and your comment does not address any point the author made. It consists instead of merely a series of ad personam attacks, written in an insufferable self-conceited tone, that seems aimed at making the average reader cringe. I cannot fathom any other intention for it, really.

    Your previous essay consisted of more than 11,000 words of counterfactual arguments based on “what if”s that will never be proven, delivered with complacent self-assurance. Retarded emotional arguments, as in the case of the dead officer wedding photo, were given in support for the sake – I don’t know? – of maintaining the whole thing unbearable to the discerning reader from word 1 to word 11,700.

    For the record, it’s much more plausible that Hitler decision to go for the Ukraine and then conquer the oil fields in the Caucasus (Stalingrad needed to be neutralised in order to achieve that) was really the more sensible choice, rather than just advance to Moscow for the sake of taking the capital.

    Also, as the author here explains, a German retreat during the Winter of 1941 would have easily turned into a rout, as there were no secure positions to hold, no geographical features to anchor to, all the way from the outskirts of Moscow back to Prussia.

    On this topic, this is really just basic knowledge, of anyone acquainted with Irving’s Hitler’s War, or with the writings of Ron Unz about the subject on this site.

  • Can somebody explain why AIPAC and ADL are not doing their job in case of UNZ.com ?

    •ï¿½Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
    @Punchthem

    "...Can somebody explain why AIPAC and ADL are not doing their job in case of UNZ.com ..?"

    Answer: conspiracy of silence.
  • The most consequential thing Hitler did to restore Germany was simply remove Jews from all influential positions. Imagine what could happen in America if that was done.

  • @TeutonicDane
    What an Excellent article. Always good to call out the charlatans.

    The Truth is the Truth is the Truth. You either go all the way and embrace the TRUTH, or you are a charlatan and trying to misdirect or deceive. I don't like it and couldn't do it personally, but I have some understanding why some do it for money (as in they don't want to lose all their money and future money). And some of them can still do some good, at least in a small part. But the ones that do it to support the literal agenda of our enslavers, hope you are Still having fun being yahweh/jehovah/baals little bi*** in the afterlife. Good luck! I choose God, personally.

    I've said for years and years, this huh-white "nationalism" scene, aka globalism for all the vast and various ppl with whitish pigmented skin, I believe is run by the Feds. And mainly preys on rootless cosmopolitan or mixed "Americans". But lately I have been seeing this "huh-white" talk in various European news. The victim was "huh-white". The % of the population that is "huh-white". You mean a German? Or an Irish? Or a French, or Italian, or Greek, or Bohemian, etc., etc.. "huh-white", It literally is giving various invaders ownership of the people/race. Everyone is exactly who they are because of who they are, the soil or place doesn't change that FACT. Having similar pigmented skin to another, doesn't change that. You could use the mongrelized Ashkenazis as a perfect example of this. Yeah, they probably have some Polak or Russian blood, but are they Polish or Russian?! I think we all know the answer to that. THEY DO anyways!

    The answer is in embracing Tradition, not new age huh-white "nationalism". You can have respect and recognize shared or similar culture/history/ancient distant genetic relations. It doesn't have to mean globalism, or "okay ill accept these invader immigrants to take what is mine and for my children, because at least they have whitish pigmented skin".

    And btw, any Man with Honor and Knowledge, never armchair quarterbacks or criticizes the actual Man in the Arena. And definitely not a Legendary Hero of Old. A literal Avatar.

    I admire any people that are free and sovereign in this current age of filth, and there are not very many. But that does not make me Russian because I admire Russia or Putin, that does not make me Chinese, because I admire the Chinese, that does not make me Iranian, because I admire the Iranians. I hope one day Germanic people will join them in the ranks of the free and sovereign "peoples" on this Earth. We shall see if we survive. But I will never give up trying. And it is going to be a long long road because of the depths we have sunk to. But if by chance we somehow survive, those that exist, will be WORTHY.

    Replies: @anon, @Emslander, @Jeffrey A Freeman, @Odd Rabbit, @John Johnson

    Christ is The Truth.

    Every knee shall bow.

    •ï¿½LOL: Half Norwegian
  • @Priss Factor
    Invading Russia was the stupidest way to fight Jewish supremacism.

    Replies: @grettir, @zumbuddi

    What would you have done to fight Jewish supremicism, Priss?

    Firebomb New York City?

  • For those who don’t know, Greg Conte has a podcast called “Prussian Socialism”. Episodes are released sporadically, but they have some interesting content spanning various European subjects and various time periods. Some of the content is behind a paywall, but most of it is free.

    https://odysee.com/@gregoryconte:2?view=content

    Obviously, Greg is very “pro-Hitler”, and the subjects of his podcast are centered on Germany. But the most interesting episodes to me are the ones dealing with Erich von Manstein and Heinz Guderian, which I think will be of interest to anyone who enjoys learning about the military aspects of WWII.

    https://odysee.com/@gregoryconte:2/Prussian-Socialism-Episode-17-Lost-Victories-by-Erich-von-Manstein:3

    https://odysee.com/@gregoryconte:2/Prussian-Socialism-Episode-13-Guderian-and-the-Blitzkrieg:9

    •ï¿½Agree: Hinz
  • @Franz
    @nokangaroos

    Tariffs begetting depressions is mythology. Great Britain, France, Spain and most imperial powers had tariffs to favor their home industries during their respective Golden eras.

    Free trade is the gambit failing powers use to hang onto some residual prosperity. That desperation might have something to do with depressions, but economists don't like to bring it up.

    Replies: @nokangaroos, @Kilmore Trotter

    Free trade is usually promoted by a new and rising power, whose elites are confident they can win foreign markets and profit from removing obstacles to trade. It’s the failing power which is closing off its market, its elites trying to save themselves at the cost of welfare of the general populace.

    I don’t mean to say there are not valid >>political<< reasons for tariffs and subsidies. Their cost may be somewhat justified by addressing security issues (propping up of militarily important industries) or fixing more unpleasant consequences of other tools/regulations already employed.

  • For years, Tucker Carlson had been the highest-rated host on television, courageously covering the important, controversial topics that few others dared to touch. After his forced departure from FoxNews in April 2023, he soon launched an even bolder interview show on Elon Musk's Twitter platform, now completely free of the timorous corporate oversight and time...
  • @Cesar Tort - Priest of the 14 words
    @Odyssey

    Thank you, I have my own webzine The West's Darkest Hour where I discuss Xtianity, Hitler, National-Socialism, Nordic blondes, etc

    I know the origin of the word "Caesar" very well, but the origins of the man himself Gaius Iulius Caesar, I believe he was Illyrian/Serbyan or something like that

    Replies: @Belis60

    From Italy, Julius Caesar as a Serb is one of the worst idiocies I have heard in my entire life.

  • I am a huge Bonapartist. I support the Napoleonic code, the establishment of a pan-European Empire under French leadership, and the destruction of the Holy Roman Empire and the reorganization of the German States as the Confederation of the Rhine. Napoleon himself, however, I abhor. While he led from the front, repeatedly risking his life...
  • Pissing off your neighbors by killing thousands of them and destroying their cities is no way to make friends. In fact you have just created mortal enemies who will retaliate and destroy you. Most people just want to live life, eat drink and be merry. But now by killing many of them you have just pissed off quite of few of these people and will pay the price. Besides, calling them “Untermenschen” is no way to make friends.

    Nationalism is fine. Just keep it within your own borders. If Hitler tried to invade my personal property I’d bitch slap him till he came to his senses.

    That’s probably why Europe is in such a sad state today. Millions of Europeans killed. Europe united is how European people will survive in a world with rapidly changing demographics.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Kilmore Trotter
    @europeasant

    If the EU is what you mean by "united" Europe then thank you very much and good bye. EU supports all the stuff that makes immigration issues more of an issue, its green deal plan chokes member states' economies, its foreign policy is Russophobic beyond comprehension and self-preservation.

    Demographics changes you refer to conflate two very different topics:

    a) You cannot run a nanny state whose borders are not tightly shut.

    b) More importantly, the very phrase "changing demographics" is grossly misleading one. What needs to be said aloud is the following: Healthy women should have three children or more, that's the norm. Without children all the other issues and debates lose most of their urgency and importance. Why worry about future if not for somebody to live it we can relate to?
    , @HdC
    @europeasant

    Every military move made by Germany was ultimately of defensive nature. Every single one!

    Replies: @John Johnson
  • @TeutonicDane
    What an Excellent article. Always good to call out the charlatans.

    The Truth is the Truth is the Truth. You either go all the way and embrace the TRUTH, or you are a charlatan and trying to misdirect or deceive. I don't like it and couldn't do it personally, but I have some understanding why some do it for money (as in they don't want to lose all their money and future money). And some of them can still do some good, at least in a small part. But the ones that do it to support the literal agenda of our enslavers, hope you are Still having fun being yahweh/jehovah/baals little bi*** in the afterlife. Good luck! I choose God, personally.

    I've said for years and years, this huh-white "nationalism" scene, aka globalism for all the vast and various ppl with whitish pigmented skin, I believe is run by the Feds. And mainly preys on rootless cosmopolitan or mixed "Americans". But lately I have been seeing this "huh-white" talk in various European news. The victim was "huh-white". The % of the population that is "huh-white". You mean a German? Or an Irish? Or a French, or Italian, or Greek, or Bohemian, etc., etc.. "huh-white", It literally is giving various invaders ownership of the people/race. Everyone is exactly who they are because of who they are, the soil or place doesn't change that FACT. Having similar pigmented skin to another, doesn't change that. You could use the mongrelized Ashkenazis as a perfect example of this. Yeah, they probably have some Polak or Russian blood, but are they Polish or Russian?! I think we all know the answer to that. THEY DO anyways!

    The answer is in embracing Tradition, not new age huh-white "nationalism". You can have respect and recognize shared or similar culture/history/ancient distant genetic relations. It doesn't have to mean globalism, or "okay ill accept these invader immigrants to take what is mine and for my children, because at least they have whitish pigmented skin".

    And btw, any Man with Honor and Knowledge, never armchair quarterbacks or criticizes the actual Man in the Arena. And definitely not a Legendary Hero of Old. A literal Avatar.

    I admire any people that are free and sovereign in this current age of filth, and there are not very many. But that does not make me Russian because I admire Russia or Putin, that does not make me Chinese, because I admire the Chinese, that does not make me Iranian, because I admire the Iranians. I hope one day Germanic people will join them in the ranks of the free and sovereign "peoples" on this Earth. We shall see if we survive. But I will never give up trying. And it is going to be a long long road because of the depths we have sunk to. But if by chance we somehow survive, those that exist, will be WORTHY.

    Replies: @anon, @Emslander, @Jeffrey A Freeman, @Odd Rabbit, @John Johnson

    And it is going to be a long long road because of the depths we have sunk to.

    Starting at the bottom will make the rise pure and undeterred.

  • @Makow reader
    Jewish bean spiller letting the kitties out of the bags:

    Hitler
    https://henrymakow.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-search.cgi?search=hitler&IncludeBlogs=1&limit=20

    Nazi
    https://henrymakow.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-search.cgi?search=nazi&IncludeBlogs=1&limit=20

    Bormann
    https://henrymakow.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-search.cgi?search=bormann&IncludeBlogs=1&limit=20

    Goering
    https://henrymakow.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-search.cgi?search=goering&IncludeBlogs=1&limit=20

    Zion
    https://henrymakow.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-search.cgi?search=zion&IncludeBlogs=1&limit=20

    Rothschild
    https://henrymakow.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-search.cgi?search=rothschild&IncludeBlogs=1&limit=20

    Replies: @Che Guava

    I read Makow at times, only because I find the lies of hysterical liars like him amusing.

    His latest move is promoting Xi Jinping to ‘secret member of Chabad Ludicrous’, with zero evidence for it.

    The man (Markov) is a pro. disinformer, his Ph. D in literature was doubtless of little worth, and I can’t recall him ever having stated the topic of his thesis.

    Truly a creepy character, really like a fifth-rate Alex Jones or David Icke.

    As for the article, Conte is making several good points.

  • anon[162] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:

    It’s not about Hitler. It’s about the National Socialist SYSTEM. The psychological conditioning against Hitler has been intense, and is actually a distraction. What was it about National Socialism that took Germany from a bankrupt Wiemar Republic into the economic miracle? It wasn’t just one guy. It was a massive team effort by the entire German people. How many great geniuses did Hitler have behind him? Thousands.
    The jew rub is getting Americans to think in individualistic terms…not group terms. They want you to think about the great man as opposed to the great group. Jews have their power from group strength, not one guy.
    Focus on saving the Europeans, removing the minorities (social terrorists), but most importantly reviving the economy.
    1-Connect the currency to units of labor (like NS)
    2-Federalize the Federal Reserve Bank (like NS)
    3-Federalize all the corporations (like NS)
    4-Erase all debts, state and personal (like NS)

    We could go on all day here, but you get the point. The focus on Hitler is a mistake and feeds into jew conditioning.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Anonymous
    @anon

    Exactly right - the National Socialist System did wonders for Germany. I remember was a schoolboy, and a coin collector, that I had a lot of Nongeld Notes - paper money from the Weinmar Period (pre Hitler) when Germany was a bankrupt country - notes in the million or billion mark notes and worthless - and then real silver coinage under Hitler.: Ex. 5 Mark. Why didn't American bring in Hitler's bankers rather than his misille scientists? We would have been better off.
    , @Thomasina
    @anon

    "The jew rub is getting Americans to think in individualistic terms…not group terms. They want you to think about the great man as opposed to the great group. Jews have their power from group strength, not one guy."

    Very true. The article posted on Unz the other day by Ricardo Duchesne titled "White Europeans responsible for almost all of the greatest human achievements" really brought out the jewish fear, anger and envy. "How dare you try to form a 'group'. How dare you try to stand out! What you're doing is bragging. You didn't do that; God did." And on and on.

    You are correct, there is power in group strength. This is what they are afraid of. This is why they are trying to erase our history, our culture ("You don't have a culture"), our traditions, and it's why they elevate all other groups, comically so, and why they're flooding the West with foreigners in order to dilute the group.

    If they have to, they will instigate a civil war. And it won't be "White Europeans want their own country." It will be the "racist Whites against all others".

    Up until this time Whites never saw the need to pound their chests or form a strong, cohesive group, and the jews are doing everything in their power to make sure that group is never able to form.

    Groups need an enemy. The enemy is now being seen by millions. It is good to have empathy for others, to be kind and benevolent, but your first priority must always be to show empathy for yourself, for the group.
  • To the shock and dismay of those of a more mainstream, conservative persuasion, many different voices in dissident right, far right, and populist right circles have expressed adulation, admiration, and approval for Adolf Hitler, seemingly without qualification or reservation.[1] Particularly in “Culture as Programming,†I have expressed sympathy for and agreement with much of the...
  • @Poupon Marx
    @Quinn

    Your stated conclusion, via the process you describe is not a scientific one. It is highly inferential, and indirect, far removed in origin from today, and many if not all live sources are dead. This is NOT forensic evidence, e.g., pottery shards, DNA, writing, etc. These are observations from human beings. I should not have to tell you the built in low confidence level and fragility upon relying solely on recitations, memoirs, and group consensus.

    I don't know your scientific field, but I doubt it is a STEM one. You do not display healthy skepticism and objectivity. And you completely fail to address my concerns, ipso facto, that all events of this dimension have multiple antecedents. Your credentials are irrelevant, though of peripheral concern.

    The Germans were the fertile soils where Amschel and his brothers first convened with other financial Jews to pool their monies and "take over the World". Over centuries, Germany not only assisted with the germination of these Parasites, but provided them with resources at the cost of their own populations commonweal. And then finally when they have gained strength, like the movie Alien the body burst from the belly of the host.

    You should read the servile, lickspittle, and abject concession of the Europeans to the Rothchilds in the 19th century, and their extracted wealth.

    Finally, to me you display an intellectual smugness and sloth. Your analysis and explanation does not match who and what you say you are. Think like an epidemiologist or a marine engineer like me. I once had an essential piece of equipment that failed and had two causes, independent and unrelated simultaneously fail. In the future, don't worry. AI will do everything for you.

    Replies: @Tiptoethrutulips

    This is NOT forensic evidence, e.g., pottery shards, DNA, writing, etc. These are observations from human beings

    Are there any writings that can’t be classified as observations from human beings?

    Is there NO forensic evidence that refutes the official narratives of WW2/so-called Holocaust? Is there any forensic evidence that supports the so-called Holocaust? What, then, is/was the point of creating such a fantastic story with essentially no forensic evidence, but gobs of “personal observations?â€

    How has the concocted tale been maintained/protected from scrutiny?

    that all events of this dimension have multiple antecedents

    No one denies this, meine Kröte. But, was there something elemental, beyond just human nature, at the core of the 20th century conflicts?

    Germany not only assisted with the germination of these Parasites, but provided them with resources at the cost of their own populations commonweal. And then finally when they have gained strength, like the movie Alien the body burst from the belly of the host.

    No, not “Germany,†just like not all Americans support Israel; the truth of “Israel†and their shenanigans is obscured/unknown, generally, and have you been reading Mein Kampf again?

    You should read the servile, lickspittle, and abject concession of the Europeans to the Rothchilds in the 19th century, and their extracted wealth.

    Did anyone in Europe try to stop this madness? I wonder….

    a marine engineer like me. I once had an essential piece of equipment that failed and had two causes,

    1. Whiskey swilling.
    2. Lack of oversight due to excessive pining-away over that blonde steward who rejected you.

    Long afloat on shipless oceans…

    Now my foolish boat is leaning
    Broken lovelorn on your rocks

    •ï¿½Replies: @Poupon Marx
    @Tiptoethrutulips


    Are there any writings that can’t be classified as observations from human beings?
    �
    Of course there are, you dolt. Using a general query outside and without reference to the quotes under discussion is a weak logical fallacy and diversion; which is your forte these days, Miss Bo Peep.

    The rest of your comment consists of intellectually lazy and meaningless questions. Ask a more profound one, for example: "How much is that doggy in the window. The one with the waggety tail?"

    Replies: @Tiptoethrutulips
  • I am a huge Bonapartist. I support the Napoleonic code, the establishment of a pan-European Empire under French leadership, and the destruction of the Holy Roman Empire and the reorganization of the German States as the Confederation of the Rhine. Napoleon himself, however, I abhor. While he led from the front, repeatedly risking his life...
  • anon[153] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:
    @TeutonicDane
    What an Excellent article. Always good to call out the charlatans.

    The Truth is the Truth is the Truth. You either go all the way and embrace the TRUTH, or you are a charlatan and trying to misdirect or deceive. I don't like it and couldn't do it personally, but I have some understanding why some do it for money (as in they don't want to lose all their money and future money). And some of them can still do some good, at least in a small part. But the ones that do it to support the literal agenda of our enslavers, hope you are Still having fun being yahweh/jehovah/baals little bi*** in the afterlife. Good luck! I choose God, personally.

    I've said for years and years, this huh-white "nationalism" scene, aka globalism for all the vast and various ppl with whitish pigmented skin, I believe is run by the Feds. And mainly preys on rootless cosmopolitan or mixed "Americans". But lately I have been seeing this "huh-white" talk in various European news. The victim was "huh-white". The % of the population that is "huh-white". You mean a German? Or an Irish? Or a French, or Italian, or Greek, or Bohemian, etc., etc.. "huh-white", It literally is giving various invaders ownership of the people/race. Everyone is exactly who they are because of who they are, the soil or place doesn't change that FACT. Having similar pigmented skin to another, doesn't change that. You could use the mongrelized Ashkenazis as a perfect example of this. Yeah, they probably have some Polak or Russian blood, but are they Polish or Russian?! I think we all know the answer to that. THEY DO anyways!

    The answer is in embracing Tradition, not new age huh-white "nationalism". You can have respect and recognize shared or similar culture/history/ancient distant genetic relations. It doesn't have to mean globalism, or "okay ill accept these invader immigrants to take what is mine and for my children, because at least they have whitish pigmented skin".

    And btw, any Man with Honor and Knowledge, never armchair quarterbacks or criticizes the actual Man in the Arena. And definitely not a Legendary Hero of Old. A literal Avatar.

    I admire any people that are free and sovereign in this current age of filth, and there are not very many. But that does not make me Russian because I admire Russia or Putin, that does not make me Chinese, because I admire the Chinese, that does not make me Iranian, because I admire the Iranians. I hope one day Germanic people will join them in the ranks of the free and sovereign "peoples" on this Earth. We shall see if we survive. But I will never give up trying. And it is going to be a long long road because of the depths we have sunk to. But if by chance we somehow survive, those that exist, will be WORTHY.

    Replies: @anon, @Emslander, @Jeffrey A Freeman, @Odd Rabbit, @John Johnson

    > We could point to Iran (1941, 1953)

    Go ahead, display your ignorance. While it’s true that Reza Shah got rid of the Jewish bank in Iran and bet his throne on Germany, Mossadeq was a freemason and he did absolutely nothing about the financial system. In fact he came over hat in hand to beg for U$ money and they said no. As for Reza Shah and 1941, the allies invaded Iran to open a land corridor from Persian Gulf to the Caspian Sea and the Caucus.

  • Odyssey says:
    @Passing by

    But from a geostrategic viewpoint, it is very clear what Germany had to do: bring German-speaking populations isolated by the Versailles treaty back into the Reich and win territory in the East in order to have the agricultural-demographic base to compete with the United States (see especially Adam Tooze The Wages of Destruction).
    �
    And let's dispose of the Slavs who lived on that territory thousands of years before any German set foot there. After all, Slavs are untermenschen.

    The fact remains that it was 70 million Germans and a few thousand noble Romanians, Italians, Hungarians, Finns, Frenchmen, Scandinavians and others who stood up to Jewish power
    �
    None of those noble people stood to Jewish power, they signed up with the Axis team because they wanted their neighbours' land. How noble is that?

    In Mein Kampf, Hitler points out that no political movement can afford to disregard the example of a great hero.
    �
    Mein Kampf is the work of a sociopath, and I don't mean arguably, I mean provably.

    Good people die in war. That is how it goes. How does the death of a good German officer besmirch the leadership of Adolf Hitler?
    �
    By having all idealistic valiant men die and grifting cowards survive? When only von der Leyen's, Baerbock's, Scholz's, Merz's, Schwab's - a half-Nazi, half-Jew btw - grandparents / parents survive, you get Ursula, Annalena, Olaf, Friedrich, Klaus. It's friggin' elementary logic.

    Some readers might regard my tone as overly personal.
    �
    It's actually the same tone as, what was the name of the guy who penned an hagiography of Monsanto and Big Pharma then went to insult commenters who disagreed on this site some time ago? You're not that different from Jews you see.

    And finally, my favourite:

    The author’s pretense of caring about the Slavs is a pose.
    �
    I'll grant you that you're almost honest about it. Almost because you dare not say openly what you really think about Slavs. But your omission of Slovaks on your list of Germany's allies that I quoted above speaks of itself. Funny also that you included Scandinavians, apart from Quisling I don't see whom you have in mind, and omitted the Balts, the only people with actually somewhat legitimate grievances against Russia. Or did you perhaps confuse the former with the latter?

    Replies: @Odyssey, @Franklin Ryckaert, @Poupon Marx

    He also did not mention the noble Croatian Ustashas, who were also sent to the Eastern Front. About 160K Romanian Shirley Impalers left their noble bones under Stalingrad. Hitler consciously sacrificed Von Pauwels’ army under Stalingrad, knowing that none would return. If he had withdrawn those million soldiers to some defensive positions in e.g. Poland or the German border, the Russians would not have been able to defeat them because they would have had ten times the casualties. What a mentally ill person. Only those who adore him more than Kim Jong Un are sicker than him.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Passing by
    @Odyssey

    Yes, I noticed his omission of those really fine folks whose barbarity is only matched by that of Western-backed Islamic radicals in the Middle-East but given that I'm Serb, if I had mentioned them, nazitards would have said that I'm biased so I intentionally omitted them.
  • @Bankotsu

    Does the author think that, had Hitler handled the Danzig crisis a bit differently, that England could have been “persuaded†into not escalating to war?
    �
    Gregory Conte, buddy, you don't have a clue about what you are talking about. Absolutely none.

    Your premise is that Britain under Neville Chamberlain in 1939 wanted a war with Germany.

    In 1939, Neville Chamberlain was moving heaven and earth to avoid war with Germany. Giving in to everything that Hitler wanted in order to avoid war.

    This is disgraceful, you yourself is totally ignorant about what happened in 1939, swallowing stupid British propaganda and regurgitating endless drivel in your article. You have no business writing articles about WWII.


    "...The efforts of the Chamberlain group to continue the policy of appeasement by making economic and other concessions to Germany and their efforts to get Hitler to agree to a four-power pact form one of the most shameful episodes in the history of recent British diplomacy.

    These negotiations were chiefly conducted through Sir Horace Wilson and consisted chiefly of offers of colonial bribes and other concessions to Germany. These offers were either rejected or ignored by the Nazis.

    …If, by means of another Munich, he could have obtained a German-Polish settlement that would satisfy Germany and avoid war, he would have taken it. It was the hope of such an agreement that prevented him from making any real agreement with Russia, for it was, apparently, the expectation of the British government that if the Germans could get the Polish Corridor by negotiation, they could then drive into Russia across the Baltic States..."

    https://web.archive.org/web/20221029210347/http://www.yamaguchy.com/library/quigley/anglo_12b.html
    http://www.carrollquigley.net/books.htm


    “…In this way, the government put London into a panic in 1938 for the first time since 1804 or even 1678. And by this panic, Chamberlain was able to get the British people to accept the destruction of Czechoslovakia, wrapping it up in a piece of paper, marked “peace in our time,†which he obtained from Hitler, as he confided to that ruthless dictator, “for British public opinion.â€

    Once this panic passed, Chamberlain found it impossible to get the British public to follow his program, although he himself never wavered, even in 1940. He worked on the appeasement and the “peace at any price†groups throughout 1939, but their numbers dwindled rapidly, and since he could not openly appeal for support on either the anti-Bolshevik or the “three-bloc†basis, he had to adopt the dangerous expedient of pretending to resist (in order to satisfy the British public) while really continuing to make every possible concession to Hitler which would bring Germany to a common frontier with the Soviet Union, all the while putting every pressure on Poland to negotiate and on Germany to refrain from using force in order to gain time to wear Poland down and in order to avoid the necessity of backing up by action his pretense of resistance to Germany. This policy went completely astray in the period from August 1939 to April 1940.

    Chamberlain’s motives were not bad ones; he wanted peace so that he could devote Britain’s “limited resources†to social welfare; but he was narrow and totally ignorant of the realities of power, convinced that international politics could be conducted in terms of secret deals, as business was, and he was quite ruthless in carrying out his aims, especially in his readiness to sacrifice non-English persons, who, in his eyes, did not count…â€

    http://www.carrollquigley.net/pdf/Tragedy_and_Hope.pdf (page 584)


    See my comments 196, 205, 263, 266, 343, 346, 383, 388, 405, 437, 488, 518, 535 here:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-charles-a-lindbergh-and-the-america-first-movement/

    Replies: @Quinn

    What Jewish rubbish, lol. One of your citations is a giant run-on sentence. Poppycock ex post facto. I would have to guess, you are simply still quite unawares how pervasive and insidious the J power structure is and has been at contorting history. Any sane person who comes to grasp it, would not behave as you do.

  • To the shock and dismay of those of a more mainstream, conservative persuasion, many different voices in dissident right, far right, and populist right circles have expressed adulation, admiration, and approval for Adolf Hitler, seemingly without qualification or reservation.[1] Particularly in “Culture as Programming,†I have expressed sympathy for and agreement with much of the...
  • @Patrick McNally
    @Tiptoethrutulips

    > Heinrich Heine – Jewish; third cousin to Karl Marx.

    So, what's your point?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heinrich_Heine#Political_poetry_and_Karl_Marx

    -----
    In the isolation he felt after the Börne debacle, Marx's friendship came as a relief to Heine, since he did not really like the other radicals. On the other hand, he did not share Marx's faith in the industrial proletariat and remained on the fringes of socialist circles...

    Heine always had mixed feelings about communism. He believed its radicalism and materialism would destroy much of the European culture that he loved and admired.
    -----

    > Adolf Hitler succeeded in bringing prosperity and equality to all Germans,

    Utter nonsense. Germany began suffering from food shortages as early as 1936. That was a big motivator for Hitler to occupy the Rhineland. He needed some kind of quick success story to cover over the tensions which were developing domestically.

    -----
    But the rearmament drive was now seriously threatened by the food crisis. In spring 1936 Hitler again personally intervened, in the face of Schacht's bitter objections, to allocate Darre once more scarce foreign currency -- 60 million Reich Marks on this occasion -- for the purchase of seed-oil. The armaments position was becoming desperate. Schacht had to explain to Blomberg in December that an increase in raw-material imports was out of the question. By early 1936, available supplies of raw materials for rearmament had shrunk to a precariously low level. Only one to two months' supplies were left. Schacht demanded a slow-down in the pace of rearmament.

    As Hitler entered his fourth year as Chancellor, the economic situation proved a real threat to rearmament plans. At the very time that international developments encouraged the most rapid expansion possible, the food crisis -- and the unrest it had stirred -- was sharply applying the brakes to it. Other indicators were also discouraging. Fears of a new rise in unemployment seemed likely to be borne out. In January 1936 the Reich Labour Ministry was gloomily reporting unemployment still running at around 2.5 million, with, it seemed, little prospect of a further lasting reduction. Any slow-down in rearmament, as Goerdeler and Schacht were advocating, would inevitably bring increased unemployment in its train.
    -----
    -- Ian Kershaw, Hitler: 1889-1936, Hubris, pp. 580-1.

    Since all of the economic steps taken by Hitler in 1933-5 had been centered on rearmament, the apparent economic recovery in those years was dependent upon achieving some kind of returns from rearmament itself. Hence, Hitler was pressed to either reorient the economy with less dependence on the arms industry (as Schacht advocated) or else start achieving victories based on the arms build-up.

    Replies: @Tiptoethrutulips

    So, what’s your point?

    That Jews are often over-represented in movements to inorganically restructure society; their goal is not to benefit society at large, but to emancipate Jewry to further subjugate the “little guys†for whom they pretend to advocate. They care NOT for Gentile society unless they can benefit or use it for gain; or to disrupt their classic enemy – a homogeneous “White†nation; say, perhaps, like the real purpose of the NAACP….

    had mixed feelings…He believed its radicalism and materialism would destroy much of the European culture that he loved and admired.

    Oh? So, he disavowed Marx, communism, and the Jewish element thereof? I’m guessing – NO.

    Ian Kershaw, Hitler: 1889-1936, Hubris

    Does Ian Kershaw also say that Hitler murdered 6 million Jews in gas chambers? And, that he sacked Austria? And, that Germany had their Evil Eyes on South America until the SLB got his paws on that Secret Map? And, that Churchill and SLBFDR were fine statesmen who saved the World from tyranny to establish a Democracy that has been used to magically shift the demographics within Europe/European nations to include black/brown cesspools of ineptitude and crime in the interests of Never Again! and to install a democratic process that We never actually wanted/approved/voted on?

    Stop supporting/spreading lies, exaggerations, obfuscations, and more lies, Pretzel.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Patrick McNally
    @Tiptoethrutulips

    > movements to inorganically restructure society

    The type of movements which were occurring in the mid-19th century were much more naturally organic than anything which can be said about the German National Socialist Party in the 1920-45 period. The only functional program which Hitler had was to prepare the German military until it was ready to expand and then set out to acquire living space. If Hitler had died of a stroke in early 1939, then he probably would have been remembered much better as some kind of "organic" leader. But his determination to sweep across Czechia as preparation for a drive to the east for living space was a very personal agenda that did not spring organically from anywhere else.

    The development and growth of the Social Democratic Party from the late 19th to early 20th centuries was probably the most significant organic development that ever happened in Germany during the 19th & 20th centuries. Unfortunately, the Social Democrats did well as labor leaders but were not prepared for dealing with the emergence of Germany as a major imperial power. They voted for war credits in 1914, when all labor parties across Europe should have been denouncing the war. The Social Democrats played a central role in enabling the continuation of the war for 4 years, and then the scoundrel Ludendorff simply smeared them with charges of a stab in the back. If the Social Democrats had simply disintegrated as a party in early 1914, then it is likely that the German war effort would have broken down in 1916 at the latest and this would have been better for the world. After World War I all of the parties showed a lot of confusion and none of them can really be characterized as "organic" in the way that the influences of people like Heine and Marx in the 19th century often were.
  • I am a huge Bonapartist. I support the Napoleonic code, the establishment of a pan-European Empire under French leadership, and the destruction of the Holy Roman Empire and the reorganization of the German States as the Confederation of the Rhine. Napoleon himself, however, I abhor. While he led from the front, repeatedly risking his life...
  • Quinn says:
    @Hulkamania

    Hitler was the greatest champion of European values against the unremitting onslaught of Jewish financial power and moral corruption.
    �
    If this were true, then why did Hitler want to team up with the Judeo-British empire? Why did he treat the Brits with kid gloves instead of annihilating them? How could he be the "greatest champion" against Jewish financial power if he never wanted war with Britain? Fighting Jewish power would necessarily mean fighting the root of Jewish power, which was the British empire, but Hitler never wanted to do that. Even after Britain declared war, he only reluctantly fought them half-heartedly.

    Replies: @Franz, @Quinn

    I think Franz alludes to it, but basically Hitler was giving Britain and her leadership a chance to cast off the yoke of Jewish power, without war. And from some information ive seen, there was at least a small chance that might have been possible. Had Hitler tried to conquer Britain by force, that would certainly been much more untenable or at least difficult. There is no doubt that Hitler made multiple major proofs of his desire for peace and fraternity.

  • @Priss Factor
    Invading Russia was the stupidest way to fight Jewish supremacism.

    Replies: @grettir, @zumbuddi

    Du Schwein

    •ï¿½Agree: Hinz
  • To the shock and dismay of those of a more mainstream, conservative persuasion, many different voices in dissident right, far right, and populist right circles have expressed adulation, admiration, and approval for Adolf Hitler, seemingly without qualification or reservation.[1] Particularly in “Culture as Programming,†I have expressed sympathy for and agreement with much of the...
  • fufu says:
    @Tiptoethrutulips
    @Odyssey

    Nothing in your post refutes my assertion/the fact of Russians using rape, robbery, and gratuitous violence against civilians as a sanctioned method/tactic of war.

    Do you want me to admit that soldiers sometimes act abhorrently during military conflicts? Sure, I know they do. Women are horrifically abused; the men/boys who seek to protect them are abused/killed, as well. However, neither Germany nor America held officially sanctioned policies against civilian populations during WW2. The Russians deliberately targeted civilians. The Soviets/Bolsheviks openly admitted to it. Many Shoah “survivors†attested to it.

    If a (Jewish, but any) woman freely admits that whilst interned in a death camp, she looked forward to the daily meetings with her male German captor, to review sheet music, no less, because he was handsome and kind, and/or if multiple (Jewish, but any) women say they sought protection from the Germans against the Soviets, then something is awry with the German Monstrosity Tale.

    Replies: @fufu

    “(…) neither Germany nor America held officially sanctioned policies against civilian populations during WW2.”

    Really?

    German policy against civilians in Poland (I have not enough knowledge about other countries where Germans also terrorized civilians).

    – 196,000 Polish children were kidnapped by Germans and moved to German families for Germanization
    – 100,000 Polish educated people were killed by Germans in Intelligenzaktion AB
    – 120,000 Polish civilians were ousted by Germans from Zamosc area* in order to make space for German colonists

    – Poles who were helping Jews were put to death (including their families**); in Western Europe there was no such draconian law.
    – many Poles were used by Germans as “living shields” during Warsaw Uprising’44.
    etc.

    More examples of German brutality and perfidity against civilians you will find in
    “The War Report in English – Abridged Version” ( https://instytutstratwojennych.pl/en/abridged-war-report);
    esp. chapters “Stolen children”, “Losses in Polish intelligentsia”.


    * “Expulsion of Poles by Nazi Germany”
    “The Expulsion of Poles by Nazi Germany during World War II was a massive operation consisting of the forced resettlement of over 1.7 million Poles from the territories of German-occupied Poland, with the aim of their Germanization (see Lebensraum) between 1939 and 1944.”
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expulsion_of_Poles_by_Nazi_Germany

    ** “Józef and Wiktoria Ulma with Seven Children”
    “The Ulma family (…) were a Polish Catholic family in Markowa, Poland, during the Nazi German occupation in World War II who attempted to rescue Polish Jewish families by hiding them in their own home during the Holocaust. They and their children were summarily executed on 24 March 1944 for doing so.”
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J%C3%B3zef_and_Wiktoria_Ulma_with_Seven_Children

  • I am a huge Bonapartist. I support the Napoleonic code, the establishment of a pan-European Empire under French leadership, and the destruction of the Holy Roman Empire and the reorganization of the German States as the Confederation of the Rhine. Napoleon himself, however, I abhor. While he led from the front, repeatedly risking his life...
  • Salient, timely articulation, an excellent summary. I’m only partway through, but appreciating it very much so far.

  • Gregory Conte has long been a stalwart for the Drang to save European man from oblivion.

    We need Hitler, now more than ever.

    Indeed.

  • Another Nazi with his idiotic ideas. I especially like locals schizophrenia. They love Hitler and for the moment enamoured with Putin’s Russia. How cute.

  • Admitted, I haven’t yet read the article but the use of ‘Is’ in the title somehow makes me reluctant. Using ‘is’ might imply that national socialism died w/ Hitler, which present day events contradict.

  • In recent years Europa: The Last Battle has become a surprise underground sensation. The 2017 film is made by Tobias Bratt, a Swedish activist. It’s ever-increasing popularity is due entirely to word of mouth and shares on social media, as censorship has banished it to the far-corners of the internet. It’s popularity is an interesting...
  • The Untold Stories of Hitler’s ‘Children’

    Dive into the chilling untold stories of Hitler’s ‘children’-two girls whose lives intertwined with the heart of the Nazi regime. Discover the shocking tale of Bernile Nienau, the Jewish girl affectionately called “the Führer’s child,” and Edda Göring, the pampered daughter of Hermann Göring, whose title as “The Princess of the Third Reich” masked a world of terror. 

    Uncover how both girls became symbols of a propaganda machine that exploited innocence while hiding the regime’s dark truths. Their stories reveal the stark contrasts of childhood amidst war, innocence alongside complicity, and the tragic consequences of ideology. 

  • To the shock and dismay of those of a more mainstream, conservative persuasion, many different voices in dissident right, far right, and populist right circles have expressed adulation, admiration, and approval for Adolf Hitler, seemingly without qualification or reservation.[1] Particularly in “Culture as Programming,†I have expressed sympathy for and agreement with much of the...
  • The Untold Stories of Hitler’s ‘Children’

    Dive into the chilling untold stories of Hitler’s ‘children’-two girls whose lives intertwined with the heart of the Nazi regime. Discover the shocking tale of Bernile Nienau, the Jewish girl affectionately called “the Führer’s child,” and Edda Göring, the pampered daughter of Hermann Göring, whose title as “The Princess of the Third Reich” masked a world of terror. 

    Uncover how both girls became symbols of a propaganda machine that exploited innocence while hiding the regime’s dark truths. Their stories reveal the stark contrasts of childhood amidst war, innocence alongside complicity, and the tragic consequences of ideology. 

  • I am a huge Bonapartist. I support the Napoleonic code, the establishment of a pan-European Empire under French leadership, and the destruction of the Holy Roman Empire and the reorganization of the German States as the Confederation of the Rhine. Napoleon himself, however, I abhor. While he led from the front, repeatedly risking his life...
  • The Untold Stories of Hitler’s ‘Children’

    Dive into the chilling untold stories of Hitler’s ‘children’-two girls whose lives intertwined with the heart of the Nazi regime. Discover the shocking tale of Bernile Nienau, the Jewish girl affectionately called “the Führer’s child,” and Edda Göring, the pampered daughter of Hermann Göring, whose title as “The Princess of the Third Reich” masked a world of terror. 

    Uncover how both girls became symbols of a propaganda machine that exploited innocence while hiding the regime’s dark truths. Their stories reveal the stark contrasts of childhood amidst war, innocence alongside complicity, and the tragic consequences of ideology. 

    •ï¿½Troll: Half Norwegian
    •ï¿½Replies: @Cloverleaf
    @Makow reader

    Du dreckiges schwein.
  • @anonymous
    "The author’s pretense of caring about the Slavs is a pose."

    Jews do the same thing. I recall Steve Sailer making this type of "But think of the Slavs!" argument some time ago - as if Sailer's principal concern were the Slavs and not his precious precious Jews.

    But I can see why he'd take this tack; it's become increasingly difficult to argue that we should have "saved the Jews" given what those ungrateful Jews went on to do to their saviors; given that they went on to subvert and destroy the very Western nations - Britain and America - which saved them. Given that they've loaded the media's spigots with anti-white propaganda and thrown open the gates of Toledo Paris, London, Sydney and New York to hostile 3rd world golem hordes.

    Interestingly, the Palestinians had a similar experience with their Jews post-WWII. Mohamed Hadid's family home, for example, was stolen by a group of Polish Jewish "refugees" they'd sheltered.[1]

    White Americans and Brits similarly find their own nations and homelands being stolen from them today by these self-same Jews.

    Scorpion meet frog.

    In citing Hitler's supposed dastardly designs on the Slavs the defenders of the mainstream "Hitler Bad!" discourse typically reach first for Generalplan Ost, but what one finds upon closer inspection of this supposed villainous German master-plan is hardly any concrete policy at all, but merely a series of drafts, proposals and amendments to drafts and proposals, some of which were more or less practical, ethical and serious than others but none of which were remotely final or definitive.

    Moreover, all governments have agencies which create proposals (many of which are discarded by higher-ups as harebrained, impractical or unethical). See, for example, Project for the New American Century or The Clean Break Report - an abominable proposal to, basically, sow chaos throughout the Middle East by overthrowing every functional government which refuses to lick Israel's boots. (Though those are maybe bad examples, because they have basically come true!)

    In any event, if America were to lose a war and then the victors dredged up the most deranged and harebrained plan that some Jew or underling came up with in the bowels of the Pentagon or State Department - presented by the tendentious propaganda arm of a foreign hostile occupying power eager to find justification and rationale for their war of aggression, do you think that America and its leadership caste of war planners would come off well? How clean would those planning rooms be?

    Imagine if the Nazis had won WWII and then dredged up the details of the Morgenthau Plan. What kind of propaganda win would that have served to be? (Of course, we see something like the Morgenthau/Kalergi/Kaufman/Hooton[2][3] plans in action today - and not just against the Germans, but the whole white Christian West. So, again, bad example...)

    Here's a better example: MacArthur wanted to drop tactical nukes on the Chinese during the Korean War. He also wanted to sow a belt of radioactive cobalt across the Korean peninsula from sea to sea to keep the Chinese out. Truman put the kibosh on that.

    Generalplan Ost is mostly a lot made out of nothing. In other words, it's like a lot of the one-sided, tendentious, de jure unfalsifiable court "historiography" we are given about WWII - and even if there were concrete plans of great enormity (which there weren't), victory has a way of sedating designs that were made in passion. Btw, how did the Germans treat the French during the Vichy period? By all honest and objective accounts: Better than the allies did (but, yes, there were some incidents with partisans). Did they force the French to learn German ("We'd all be speaking German today!") No. Ironically, France was never more French and Paris was never more Parisian than it was under German Nazi occupation - certainly far more so than it is presently under Jew/ZOG/NATO occupation.

    So, ultimately, I suppose that the lesson is: When Jews come up with some nasty evil plan, believe that they'll carry it out to the T, and worse. And when anybody else supposedly does (esp. when the Jew is reporting it), then take it with a heavy grain of salt.

    Also, when Jews accuse somebody else of some abominable things, just assume that the Jews are really doing those things themselves - or endeavor to do so.

    [1] "[W]e became refugees to Syria and we lost our home in Safad to a Jewish family that we sheltered when they were refugees from Poland on the ship that was sailing from country to country and no one would take them... they were our guest for 2 years till they made us refugees and they kicked us out of our own home."
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohamed_Hadid

    [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germany_Must_Perish!
    [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earnest_Hooton

    Replies: @Pythas, @ok_boomer

    “In citing Hitler’s supposed dastardly designs on the Slavs the defenders of the mainstream “Hitler Bad!†discourse typically reach first for Generalplan Ost, but what one finds upon closer inspection of this supposed villainous German master-plan is hardly any concrete policy at all, but merely a series of drafts, proposals and amendments to drafts and proposals, some of which were more or less practical, ethical and serious than others but none of which were remotely final or definitive.”

    Hahahaha. “But… but the papers didn’t say so. Look, it says so here on this paper.” The audacity of some of you is truly staggering. Let’s look at what the Nazis did, not what the papers say. For example, Belarus:

    Between 1941 and 1944, it is estimated that the Wehrmacht, along with the Nazi regime’s SS forces and local collaborators, wiped out over 5,000 villages in Belarus. This destruction was part of the broader strategy of terror, involving mass executions, forced labor, and the systematic annihilation of civilian populations, especially those suspected of supporting the Soviet resistance. Many villages were set on fire, and their inhabitants were killed or sent to labor camps.

    The total number of people who perished in Belarus during the German occupation in World War II is estimated to be around 2.2 million people. This includes both military and civilian casualties and encompasses a variety of horrific events:

    Jews: Approximately 800,000 Jews were killed during the Holocaust in Belarus, either through mass executions, deportation to concentration camps, or death in the ghettos.

    Civilians: In addition to the Jewish victims, many non-Jewish Belarusians also suffered from mass executions, forced labor, starvation, and other forms of violence. An estimated 1.5 million civilians died as a result of the war and occupation, including those killed in the widespread destruction of villages.

    Soviet POWs: Many Soviet prisoners of war (POWs) were also held by the Germans, with large numbers of them dying in camps or through execution.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Gustav
    @ok_boomer

    It sounds like there was a war, as wars generally are. What do they want to tell us? That the wars of other peoples were bloodless? Just read what the soldiers of the North did to their brothers in the South. And about the Jews: have you ever looked at Gaza? Or read about how the Jews killed millions of Christian Russians after the revolution in Russia? Without war? Go shit, as the Viennese say!
  • I don’t know who Mr. Parker is. Nobody does. For all I know, he could be a Jew. If so, I find his article encouraging. It means that the Jews feel their power threatened by National Socialism, so much so, that they have resorted to posing as National Socialists to undermine our morale and solidarity.

    Several of my comments in Parker’s thread at UR were blocked. I believe it was Parker, not Ron Unz, who blocked them. My last blocked comment was a thorough debunk of his exaggerations and lies about Dirlewanger. If anyone else had comments blocked on Parker’s thread, I would be interested to know.

    I think that Parker is some kind of limited hangout or, as Cass Sunstein told us, an agent of “nudge”. He is trying to “nudge” the alt-right away from discussions about Jewish depravity and sadism, and towards discussions about the foibles and shortcomings of the NSDAP, Germany and Germans in general.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Hinz
    @Obersturmbannführer

    He's likely part of Israels twentyfold increased Hasbara spending.
    Just a paid liar.


    https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hasbara


    "Hasbara Increase
    In November 2024, the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs increased its budget for hasbara, or public diplomacy, by 20 times as part of a coalition agreement with Gideon Sa'ar.
    This significant funding boost is aimed at reinforcing Israel's narrative internationally, particularly in justifying its actions in Gaza and framing Palestinian resistance as anti-Semitic and equivalent to Nazi terrorism."
    , @Poupon Marx
    @Obersturmbannführer

    It was likely your mother, who upon transferring your clothes to the dryer, saw your comments on the screen, in your absence, was embarrassed, and deleted your comment. Motherly love.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FFQbERB2DAM

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZtLiH--dxD4

    Yank me, crank me, but don't wake me up and thank me"
    , @Obersturmbannführer
    @Obersturmbannführer

    Since Mr. Conte allowed my comment on this thread concerning my comments being blocked by Richard Parker, I will take the liberty of recreating a comment on this thread. It concerned Parkers description of Dirlewanger:

    "SS units of the Dirlewanger brigade sort—and generally not of bona fide combat units such as SS LAH, Das Reich—and other rogue elements went on killing sprees of any German even suspected of desertion, whether military or civilian. This was not done with any hope of changing the outcome of the war, but to buy Hitler and his top entourage a few more days to live before having to do the inevitable. Far more appalling was the Nero Decree given to Albert Speer, which quite thankfully Speer never considered carrying out. Had he done as ordered, this Nero Decree would have done far more than merely decimate the German population."
    �
    Dirlewanger was a highly decorated veteran in an army with requirements of Prussian levels of honor and merit, who has been smeared for decades by sadistic and murderous Jews and Communists.

    https://imgur.com/fvuUSGH.png

    I then commented about the obligatory adhominems and histrionics (kvetching and squealing) whenever anyone mentions Dirlewanger was reminiscent, in a pattern matching sort of way, to how the media treats Prigozhin and the Wagner group. See this Dailymail article for reference:

    Revelling in rape, torture and brutal executions: How Putin's Wagner mercenaries' terrifying brutality echoes another group of criminals-turned-soldiers... Hitler's reviled Dirlewanger brigade

    But ironically, the methods employed by Wagner mercs bare a stark resemblance to those of the Dirlewanger brigade – a notorious division of the Nazis' SS paramilitary organisation who raped, murdered and pillaged their way through Europe as they executed Adolf Hitler's dark designs.
    �
    I pointed out how Mengele is also a favorite "worst person" strawman to be held up and beaten by authors like Parker.

    I then linked to an interview of a Dirlewanger Brigade veteran named Karl:

    Waffen-SS Sturmbrigade Dirlewanger

    Karl makes the following statement directly contradicting Parker:

    "I remember a recruit went AWOL, and he could have had him shot, but instead he only ordered extra watch duty. He was very humane and kind to us."
    �
    The entire interview is quite interesting, I am putting his description/explanation of Warsaw below the more:


    Okay, fair enough, can I ask you what happened in Warsaw during the uprising at least?

    Karl: I will talk about Warsaw, I was there, and then I will never speak of it again. In 1944, when the Allies invaded France, the Soviets launched massive attacks against the thin German front. We were now used as front line combat troops, but we were vastly outnumbered and took heavy losses. The Soviets used massive artillery attacks to break our lines. We steadily retreated back to the outskirts of Warsaw. Reports were coming that Soviet agents had been active in organizing the civilians to rise up and fight, telling them liberation was at hand. Several of our patrols had been ambushed and killed by them.

    We started seeing this during the retreat, they knew we were losing, so many civilians, not wanting to be seen as collaborators, started fighting against us in hopes of being forgiven. They would ambush ambulances, trains, and buses. A bus full of retreating Helferinnen [female auxiliaries] was attacked and the girls were raped and shot. I saw this personally outside Warsaw in Zakret, 10 young women and their two soldier escorts. All shot in the head and many of the girls had their pants down and some were bloody in their vaginas. Our leader took pictures to document this cruel act. Jewish bandits were known to be active in the area.

    The ROA [Russian volunteers on the German side] units, who were on our flank, captured some fighters and our officers asked they be brought to us. When they arrived we could tell many looked jewish. Our leaders asked them if they did this, and upon using slight force like bending arms and fingers, they admitted they were part of a large civilian army, put together with help from the Soviets to fight us. ‘Yes, they attacked the bus’ our interpreter called out. There were fifty or so of them, the leader of the ROA and our leaders conferred, then it was announced that according to military law in the region, they were sentenced to death, and our units and the ROA shot them after tying them up. A few tried to run before justice was served, but they failed.

    We noticed battle sounds inside Warsaw, and we were ordered to gather around, von dem Bach [Erich Julius Eberhard von dem Bach-Zelewski (March 1, 1899 – March 8, 1972). von dem Bach was an influential and high ranking SS figure.], Dirlewanger, and other high officers met. They then addressed us all. They said the Allies had raised and armed some civilians in the city who were now fighting us and have committed acts of terror. They were to be treated as bandits, but I want to stress that they told everyone we need to show mercy when it was asked for.

    We learned that a year earlier, while removing jews from the ghetto, due to the crime and active spying they engaged in, they put up a hell of a fight. They murdered several soldiers and civilians and had been given weapons by the Soviets. The SS had to bring in many combat units to quell them, finally breaking them and sending them to camps to be watched. The Soviets even bombed the ghetto, killing hundreds, for no known reason. They did the SS units a favor as they broke their will to fight after this.

    Now the Polish civilians were the next target of the Allies, they told them if they helped fight us, they would gain freedom, and we were on the verge of defeat. So they rose up, attacking civilians working for us, and single soldiers. They built vast networks of bunkers and tunnels to conduct hit and run raids. They took over the jewish ghetto and the western part of the city. This is what we came into. The army had managed to bring in units to contain the fighters, but any attacks had been repulsed with heavy losses.

    Luckily we were experienced in this type of fighting. As soon as our trucks dropped us off we came under sniper fire and we had our first dead. Dirlewanger was so angry he phoned demanding tank and air support. A flak truck came up and tore into the area we thought the shots came from. It was ordered the whole building be leveled, and artillery did its job.

    They scrambled out like crazy people, firing at us, and we cut them all down. The artillery wreaked havoc on their hideouts. This went on for hours; some stumbled out of nowhere to surrender and were interrogated for information then sent to the rear. There had to be hundreds dead, men, women and children. We were furious these people were that stupid to think they could stand against us, and with their children in tow. How cruel could a parent be to put their children in harm’s way? Knowing we would shoot back. Friendly Poles came to help us and pinpoint the areas of resistance.

    In one area, we came upon a cellar where German soldiers had been tortured, there was blood everywhere, their teeth were knocked out and fingers cut off. After seeing this, it was announced no more prisoners would be taken, but von dem Bach countermanded this order. Some men, especially the foreign volunteers, ignored it, and shot anyone they caught, due to the level of cruelty these civilians displayed.

    We were several days in and the western city was ablaze. Stukas attacked, heavy artillery was used, and we now had flamethrowers to hit these devils where bullets could not touch them. We even had loud speakers going around, asking that they at least let their children go, so they would not be hurt. Some complied, and more surrendered. First aid was set up to deal with their wounded. One fighter surrendered and then threw a grenade at a resting platoon; his whole group was accidentally raked by fire killing four. This was a sad mistake, but our nerves were shot by the level of barbarity these civilians were capable of. That is the power of propaganda.

    I remember an army general came to tour the damage and upon seeing the dead that still had not been buried asked if all this destruction was necessary. Dirlewanger and others took him on a tour showing how they would fight to the end, so it was hard taking them prisoner. They held onto the faith that we were done for, and any moment the victorious Allies would roll in to save them.

    The Soviets even hampered them by shelling the city, but hit areas where they were defending. Doing us a favor yet again and destroying large areas of hideouts. I was in Warsaw for 2 months, and can say we fought hard and well, but with honor. When the Poles did surrender we took them prisoner, we even took a few British and Soviet soldiers with them. They had been sent in by the Allies to help train and organize.

    By October they were finished. They asked for terms and our leaders gave them very generous ones. Everyone would surrender their arms, any criminals would be turned over and the rest can go back home. It was insane, but we had no capacity to handle them. Our food was short so it just made sense to let them go on their own. I could tell they were surprised, many thought we would shoot them all. Many of them lined up to say they were sorry to us, but the tens of thousands who died needlessly were manifested in our faces.
    �
  • But from a geostrategic viewpoint, it is very clear what Germany had to do: bring German-speaking populations isolated by the Versailles treaty back into the Reich and win territory in the East in order to have the agricultural-demographic base to compete with the United States (see especially Adam Tooze The Wages of Destruction).

    And let’s dispose of the Slavs who lived on that territory thousands of years before any German set foot there. After all, Slavs are untermenschen.

    The fact remains that it was 70 million Germans and a few thousand noble Romanians, Italians, Hungarians, Finns, Frenchmen, Scandinavians and others who stood up to Jewish power

    None of those noble people stood to Jewish power, they signed up with the Axis team because they wanted their neighbours’ land. How noble is that?

    In Mein Kampf, Hitler points out that no political movement can afford to disregard the example of a great hero.

    Mein Kampf is the work of a sociopath, and I don’t mean arguably, I mean provably.

    Good people die in war. That is how it goes. How does the death of a good German officer besmirch the leadership of Adolf Hitler?

    By having all idealistic valiant men die and grifting cowards survive? When only von der Leyen’s, Baerbock’s, Scholz’s, Merz’s, Schwab’s – a half-Nazi, half-Jew btw – grandparents / parents survive, you get Ursula, Annalena, Olaf, Friedrich, Klaus. It’s friggin’ elementary logic.

    Some readers might regard my tone as overly personal.

    It’s actually the same tone as, what was the name of the guy who penned an hagiography of Monsanto and Big Pharma then went to insult commenters who disagreed on this site some time ago? You’re not that different from Jews you see.

    And finally, my favourite:

    The author’s pretense of caring about the Slavs is a pose.

    I’ll grant you that you’re almost honest about it. Almost because you dare not say openly what you really think about Slavs. But your omission of Slovaks on your list of Germany’s allies that I quoted above speaks of itself. Funny also that you included Scandinavians, apart from Quisling I don’t see whom you have in mind, and omitted the Balts, the only people with actually somewhat legitimate grievances against Russia. Or did you perhaps confuse the former with the latter?

    •ï¿½Replies: @Odyssey
    @Passing by

    He also did not mention the noble Croatian Ustashas, who were also sent to the Eastern Front. About 160K Romanian Shirley Impalers left their noble bones under Stalingrad. Hitler consciously sacrificed Von Pauwels' army under Stalingrad, knowing that none would return. If he had withdrawn those million soldiers to some defensive positions in e.g. Poland or the German border, the Russians would not have been able to defeat them because they would have had ten times the casualties. What a mentally ill person. Only those who adore him more than Kim Jong Un are sicker than him.

    Replies: @Passing by
    , @Franklin Ryckaert
    @Passing by

    Here it's about time to add some links to articles about Nazi behavior towards Slavs:

    1) The Barbarossa Decree: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbarossa_decree

    Excerpt:

    "...The decree declared that the upcoming Operation Barbarossa, the invasion of the Soviet Union, would be a war of extermination and endorsed war crimes against Soviet civilians.

    The Barbarossa decree was laid out by Adolf Hitler during a high-level meeting with military officials on 30 March 1941, where he declared the political and intellectual elites of the Soviet Union would be eradicated by German forces, in order to ensure a long-lasting German victory..."
    �
    2) Nazi war crimes in Poland: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_crimes_in_occupied_Poland_during_World_War_II War_II

    Too much to excerpt. Read the whole article.

    3) The Hunger Plan: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunger_Plan

    Excerpt:

    "...As part of the plan, Nazi military forces were ordered to capture food stocks in occupied territories, redirect them to supply German troops and fuel the German war economy.[2][3] In addition to the extensive exploitation of resources to support the German war economy, the Hunger Plan intended to create an artificial famine in Eastern Europe, which would have resulted in deaths of around 31 to 45 million inhabitants through forced starvation..."
    �
    4) Nazi kidnap of blond children: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kidnapping_of_children_by_Nazi_Germany

    Blond children in Poland were kidnapped in order to "germanize" them. Those kidnapped children, who on closer inspection didn't meet the racial standards, were murdered.

    Of course the Nazitards will now howl that all those articles are from Wikipedia and thus automatically untrue, in order to keep their faith in "Saint" Adolf.

    I have bad news for them: "Saint" Adolf is in hell. Here is a picture of his:

    https://storage.fabulae.ru/images/authors/4364/foto_35159.jpg

    Replies: @Trinity
    , @Poupon Marx
    @Passing by

    "And the winner of veracity and veritas is ......envelope, please....Mr. Parker!
  • @Odyssey
    At first, I thought the text was humorous—what a joke. The closer we get to Victory Day, the greater the effort to revise and distort the past, even though some eyewitnesses are still alive. This text is one of the most absurd attempts at revisionism, especially since others manage to do it in a much more sophisticated way. Maybe I'll return with a more detailed comment, but for now, let's examine a few gems:

    It’s easy to get lost in the details of the Danzig Crisis or the Barbarossa timetables. The fact remains that it was 70 million Germans and a few thousand noble (O: LOL) Romanians, Italians, Hungarians, Finns, Frenchmen, Scandinavians and others who stood up to Jewish power, backed by the four biggest, most evil Empires of the time, and plenty of smaller countries.
    �

    He [Parker] goes on to attack Hitler for Germany’s supposed abuses of the Slavs.
    �
    We see another application of the so-called tulip tactic: when asked about the number of victims of German aggression in the Soviet Union (14 million civilians and 13 million prisoners of war and those killed in battle), he immediately shifts the focus to the Soviet purges, asking how many Soviets Stalin and his regime killed.

    Is Hitler responsible for all of that?
    �
    All other revisionists follow the same pattern—here, at Parker and elsewhere—carefully avoiding any mention of Soviet victims while simultaneously apologizing to the Jews, claiming that Hitler did not kill them but instead provided them with all the facilities at Auschwitz.

    The text is clearly written by someone with a shockingly low intellectual capacity for someone with even lower (read: dumbass panzers).

    Replies: @Odyssey

    Achtung – Panzers!
    (by Heinz Guderian)

    Aryans? LOL. Germans were neither Aryans nor Goths.

    Who were the Aryans?
    What does the term ‘German’ mean?

    •ï¿½Replies: @eah
    @Odyssey

    >What does the term ‘German’ mean?

    It refers to an ethnic group -- ethnic Germans or their interests -- for a person, it means someone who is biodeutsch -- a member of an identifiable Volksgemeinschaft -- a typical (ethnic) German can be identified by phenotype (völkisch-ness), language, cultural practices, etc -- you know one when you see and hear one.

    Someone who asks a question like this generally does so rhetorically -- it seems they are trying to signal that they are, in contrast to the rubes, a member of some sort of cognoscenti.

    In an informal context like this, it's pointless and stupid -- it's clear what is meant by German.
    , @Poupon Marx
    @Odyssey

    When someone uses the term "Aryans", I know immediately the person is not well educated, has a genetic chip on his shoulder (imputed superiority due to genes alone), and a mediocre and capped intelligence [no Flynn effect].
  • Bankotsu says:

    Does the author think that, had Hitler handled the Danzig crisis a bit differently, that England could have been “persuaded†into not escalating to war?

    Gregory Conte, buddy, you don’t have a clue about what you are talking about. Absolutely none.

    Your premise is that Britain under Neville Chamberlain in 1939 wanted a war with Germany.

    In 1939, Neville Chamberlain was moving heaven and earth to avoid war with Germany. Giving in to everything that Hitler wanted in order to avoid war.

    This is disgraceful, you yourself is totally ignorant about what happened in 1939, swallowing stupid British propaganda and regurgitating endless drivel in your article. You have no business writing articles about WWII.

    “…The efforts of the Chamberlain group to continue the policy of appeasement by making economic and other concessions to Germany and their efforts to get Hitler to agree to a four-power pact form one of the most shameful episodes in the history of recent British diplomacy.

    These negotiations were chiefly conducted through Sir Horace Wilson and consisted chiefly of offers of colonial bribes and other concessions to Germany. These offers were either rejected or ignored by the Nazis.

    …If, by means of another Munich, he could have obtained a German-Polish settlement that would satisfy Germany and avoid war, he would have taken it. It was the hope of such an agreement that prevented him from making any real agreement with Russia, for it was, apparently, the expectation of the British government that if the Germans could get the Polish Corridor by negotiation, they could then drive into Russia across the Baltic States…”

    https://web.archive.org/web/20221029210347/http://www.yamaguchy.com/library/quigley/anglo_12b.html
    http://www.carrollquigley.net/books.htm

    “…In this way, the government put London into a panic in 1938 for the first time since 1804 or even 1678. And by this panic, Chamberlain was able to get the British people to accept the destruction of Czechoslovakia, wrapping it up in a piece of paper, marked “peace in our time,†which he obtained from Hitler, as he confided to that ruthless dictator, “for British public opinion.â€

    Once this panic passed, Chamberlain found it impossible to get the British public to follow his program, although he himself never wavered, even in 1940. He worked on the appeasement and the “peace at any price†groups throughout 1939, but their numbers dwindled rapidly, and since he could not openly appeal for support on either the anti-Bolshevik or the “three-bloc†basis, he had to adopt the dangerous expedient of pretending to resist (in order to satisfy the British public) while really continuing to make every possible concession to Hitler which would bring Germany to a common frontier with the Soviet Union, all the while putting every pressure on Poland to negotiate and on Germany to refrain from using force in order to gain time to wear Poland down and in order to avoid the necessity of backing up by action his pretense of resistance to Germany. This policy went completely astray in the period from August 1939 to April 1940.

    Chamberlain’s motives were not bad ones; he wanted peace so that he could devote Britain’s “limited resources†to social welfare; but he was narrow and totally ignorant of the realities of power, convinced that international politics could be conducted in terms of secret deals, as business was, and he was quite ruthless in carrying out his aims, especially in his readiness to sacrifice non-English persons, who, in his eyes, did not count…â€

    http://www.carrollquigley.net/pdf/Tragedy_and_Hope.pdf (page 584)

    See my comments 196, 205, 263, 266, 343, 346, 383, 388, 405, 437, 488, 518, 535 here:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-charles-a-lindbergh-and-the-america-first-movement/

    •ï¿½Replies: @Quinn
    @Bankotsu

    What Jewish rubbish, lol. One of your citations is a giant run-on sentence. Poppycock ex post facto. I would have to guess, you are simply still quite unawares how pervasive and insidious the J power structure is and has been at contorting history. Any sane person who comes to grasp it, would not behave as you do.
  • Odyssey says:

    At first, I thought the text was humorous—what a joke. The closer we get to Victory Day, the greater the effort to revise and distort the past, even though some eyewitnesses are still alive. This text is one of the most absurd attempts at revisionism, especially since others manage to do it in a much more sophisticated way. Maybe I’ll return with a more detailed comment, but for now, let’s examine a few gems:

    It’s easy to get lost in the details of the Danzig Crisis or the Barbarossa timetables. The fact remains that it was 70 million Germans and a few thousand noble (O: LOL) Romanians, Italians, Hungarians, Finns, Frenchmen, Scandinavians and others who stood up to Jewish power, backed by the four biggest, most evil Empires of the time, and plenty of smaller countries.

    He [Parker] goes on to attack Hitler for Germany’s supposed abuses of the Slavs.

    We see another application of the so-called tulip tactic: when asked about the number of victims of German aggression in the Soviet Union (14 million civilians and 13 million prisoners of war and those killed in battle), he immediately shifts the focus to the Soviet purges, asking how many Soviets Stalin and his regime killed.

    Is Hitler responsible for all of that?

    All other revisionists follow the same pattern—here, at Parker and elsewhere—carefully avoiding any mention of Soviet victims while simultaneously apologizing to the Jews, claiming that Hitler did not kill them but instead provided them with all the facilities at Auschwitz.

    The text is clearly written by someone with a shockingly low intellectual capacity for someone with even lower (read: dumbass panzers).

    •ï¿½Replies: @Odyssey
    @Odyssey

    Achtung - Panzers!
    (by Heinz Guderian)

    Aryans? LOL. Germans were neither Aryans nor Goths.

    Who were the Aryans?
    What does the term 'German' mean?

    Replies: @eah, @Poupon Marx
  • Funny that you say that. The Jews control all white countries now. The white race is a dead race. In Europe, pro-Hitler statements are punishable with 5 years in prison. Make this 7 years, as of July 2025. Trump America must follow suit or will be totally destroyed just like Hitler Germany. The Jews run America you see. They run China too. You can rape white German girls and kick German boys in the teeth–no punishment. If they fight back, they are Nazis. Same for white Americans, soon. Total global persecution. It is what it is. The Jews are going after every one of the whites, until all that’s left is a brown soup if humanity.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Thomasina
    @Europe will crush the United States now

    The game isn't over yet. It's only the first quarter.
  • Richard Parker says: •ï¿½Website

    Mr Conte,

    My, my–what a contemptible, rambling screed that really does not warrant a response, but here goes—for the chuckles. A few things.
    You did not even get my pen name correct. Thank you of course to Dr. MacDonald for correcting this error. Receipt:
    https://archive.is/VnNkb
    This suggests you are wrong about much more besides, which of course you are. A few things stuck out, First, this ridiculous statement:

    “As for tactics: Hitler was right more often than he was wrong.â€

    It is surprising to think you were a private school teacher, before getting double crossed by Richard Spencer and all that. Everyone knows, yourself excepted it seems, that just above 50 percent accuracy is a failing grade, which is of course evidenced by the catastrophic ruin and defeat that resulted from the various strategic and tactical blunders. A ruin and defeat that probably exceeds that of even the 30 Years, the consequences neither Germany nor Europe are likely to overcome in the long-term, final analysis.
    As for soldiers being there to die on a whim, due to easily avoidable catastrophic blunders and poor decision making, Hitler said the same. Many of his best generals and officers–men far better than you, sir– were rightly outragedvt it, and that admission on your part only bolsters precisely what my essay asserts.
    Then there is this gem:

    “I could go through and refute every one of his absurd claims about the declaration of war on America or Hitler’s Eastern policies but that would be a waste of time.â€

    Except you did not, because you cannot, no one can. The war losing blunders I have set forth are incontrovertible, historical fact.
    I must say the peppering of “you†in this pitiful diatribe does amuse me. To think someone would pretend, but only pretend, to have the barest semblance of a classical education, and yet violate a fundamental maxim of composition and writing: do not write in second person. Even in the degraded American education system, most learn this at about the ninth grade.
    Finally, as for who I am… I can assure you I am not Jewish. As for what I have written here, it is readily available in the archive feature.
    https://www.unz.com/author/richard-parker/
    Some pieces have also been featured on counter-currents. Most all recent written work is available on my humble little publication, The Raven’s Call: A Reactionary Perspective, available at theravenscall.substack.com

    •ï¿½Agree: Stephen Paul Foster, Rich
    •ï¿½Thanks: Poupon Marx
    •ï¿½Replies: @Lackadaisical Reader
    @Richard Parker


    Most all recent written work is available on my humble little publication
    �
    You and your publication are anything but humble, and your comment does not address any point the author made. It consists instead of merely a series of ad personam attacks, written in an insufferable self-conceited tone, that seems aimed at making the average reader cringe. I cannot fathom any other intention for it, really.

    Your previous essay consisted of more than 11,000 words of counterfactual arguments based on "what if"s that will never be proven, delivered with complacent self-assurance. Retarded emotional arguments, as in the case of the dead officer wedding photo, were given in support for the sake - I don't know? - of maintaining the whole thing unbearable to the discerning reader from word 1 to word 11,700.

    For the record, it's much more plausible that Hitler decision to go for the Ukraine and then conquer the oil fields in the Caucasus (Stalingrad needed to be neutralised in order to achieve that) was really the more sensible choice, rather than just advance to Moscow for the sake of taking the capital.

    Also, as the author here explains, a German retreat during the Winter of 1941 would have easily turned into a rout, as there were no secure positions to hold, no geographical features to anchor to, all the way from the outskirts of Moscow back to Prussia.

    On this topic, this is really just basic knowledge, of anyone acquainted with Irving's Hitler's War, or with the writings of Ron Unz about the subject on this site.
    , @geokat62
    @Richard Parker

    Care to respond to this?

    Telegram comment posted by Joel Davis:

    An important point on the doctrine of 'Lebensraum' from Brendan Simms

    Hitler did not primarily justify the quest for Lebensraum with the inherent inferiority of the Slav population there, as an ideological war against Bolshevism, or even as a first step towards the annihilation of the Jews in Europe. His main motive was that Germany, weak herself, would in his view have to colonize her even weaker neighbour before she was herself completely enslaved. Hitler targeted the Soviet Union not so much for what it was (ideologically), as for where it lay (geographically). There was, so to speak, nothing personal about it.

    His aim throughout was not world domination, but simple national survival. There was, Hitler averred, no room for half-measures. Germany would have to be a world power, or she would go completely under. The half-measures and restraint of Bismarck’s times, he argued, were outdated in a world of global empires. ‘Germany will either be a world power or nothing,’ Hitler wrote, ‘but to be a world power one needs the necessary size.’ This meant, he concluded, that ‘the German people will only be able to guarantee their future through world power’. Hitler did not envisage ‘world domination’ by Germany, as opposed to the ‘world power’ status necessary for her very survival.

    The driving force behind Hitler’s strategy in the mid 1920s, as in the period immediately after the First World War, remained fear and admiration of Anglo-America. Lebensraum in the east would kill two birds with one stone. First, it would provide Germany with the critical territorial mass necessary to balance the American Union and the British Empire, and to some extent that of France as well. Secondly, eastward expansion would secure the raw materials and especially the farmland necessary to feed the German demographic surplus. Eastern colonization was the answer to pernicious transatlantic and antipodean migration. Hitler was proposing to strike east, but he was really looking west.

    The idea was simply to make Germany a superpower on the level of America, to resist being subjugated. Either become a superpower, or become a superpower's bitch - this was the equation Hitler saw and he chose the former. It wasn't "chauvinism" or "Nordicism" that fundamentally motivated Hitler's imperialism, it was cold hard realism.

    https://t.me/joeldavis_x/1268
    �
  • To the shock and dismay of those of a more mainstream, conservative persuasion, many different voices in dissident right, far right, and populist right circles have expressed adulation, admiration, and approval for Adolf Hitler, seemingly without qualification or reservation.[1] Particularly in “Culture as Programming,†I have expressed sympathy for and agreement with much of the...
  • @Carolyn Yeager
    @Crass


    I reckon that Richard Parker’s ponderous critique of “Nazi†Germany, would have been more fruitful, if he had shown some discipline, by not inserting the slang derogatory smear “Nazi†/“Nazis†twelve times in his clumsily disguised re-education article
    �
    Thank you for counting them (12 times!) and for speaking out on this obvious propagandist device.

    People like 'Anonymous534" want to portray such a concern as ridiculous or laughable because they know or suspect that the generally negative view of National Socialists or "Hitlerists" would be so much harder to maintain without the ubiquitous appearance of that "derogatory smear" term wherever one looks. The argument is made that it's the "people's choice," when it's actually a media invention & campaign. It expresses lack of respect for that which Adolf Hitler stood for, and for the German people, too, and their aims as a whole. Why not call them Germans? Especially if they were not members of the Party? The word is used out of habit more than anything else by the majority of people today.

    It takes some effort to break habits; it's not going to happen by itself. It's easiest to correct in writing. So let's start to work on it by noticing, as Crass has done, writers who use it excessively or habitually. It will spread from there. And thank you.

    Replies: @Anonymous534, @César Tort - Priest of the 14 words

    I’ve being changing gradually my opinion about uncle Adolf in the last year or so.
    While he had many qualities it’s undeniable that he was the biggest catastrophe that has befallen upon Aryans since Constantine and the adoption of Xtianity.

    Whilst the lunatic Hitler had nothing to lose Aryans did. His desperate attempts to delay his well deserved execution cost the lives of milions of innocent Aryans.
    Since he had absolute power , and was, unfortunately, neither deposed nor assassinated, the Aryans paid the price for his madness.
    Good systems have to have some provisions to address that. Nazi regime didn’t.

  • I am a huge Bonapartist. I support the Napoleonic code, the establishment of a pan-European Empire under French leadership, and the destruction of the Holy Roman Empire and the reorganization of the German States as the Confederation of the Rhine. Napoleon himself, however, I abhor. While he led from the front, repeatedly risking his life...
  • Carlton Meyer says: •ï¿½Website

    After the British naval blockade starved the Germans during World War I and forced them to accept the Allies demands in 1919, it is not surprising that Hitler and Germans wanted “living space” to the east to provide more food for Germany, much of it formerly part of the Germanic Austro-Hungary Empire. Millions of Germans had migrated east to not really Polish or Russian lands, but the sparsely populated region of Ukraine that had a warmer climate and rich soil. These were known as Black Sea Germans.

    So it wasn’t that Germans were crazy about conquering new lands to the east, but wanted farmland in their ancient “homeland” as this region was once populated by “Goth” Germans.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Poupon Marx
    @Carlton Meyer

    Oh, come, come Carlton. The Zionists use the same argument for Palestine. Remember the movie, "Exodus"? And the song, "God gave this land to me". There was NO Christian objection in the JUSA at the time. I was just a kid and wondered about the phoniness of this claim. Any attempt to question the Bible Thumpers around me proved to be a brick wall.

    Jews have commanded Goys for a 2000 years, and for the greatest part, they have willingly complied and obeyed their masters.
  • To the shock and dismay of those of a more mainstream, conservative persuasion, many different voices in dissident right, far right, and populist right circles have expressed adulation, admiration, and approval for Adolf Hitler, seemingly without qualification or reservation.[1] Particularly in “Culture as Programming,†I have expressed sympathy for and agreement with much of the...
  • Odyssey says:

    Achtung, Achtung Panzers!

    (by Major-General Heinz Guderian)

    Weisung Einundzwanzig

    The Fuehrer and Commander-in-Chief of the German Armed Forces

    OKW/WFSt./Abt.L(I) Nr. 33 408/40 gK Chefs.

    SECRET

    The Fuehrer’s Headquarters

    18 December 40

    (only through officer)
    9 copies, 4th copy

    Directive Nr. 21

    Case Barbarossa

    The German Wehrmacht must be prepared to crush Soviet Russia in a quick campaign (Operation Barbarossa) even before the conclusion of the war against England.

    For this purpose the Army will have to employ all available units, with the reservation that the occupied territories must be secured against surprises.

    For the Air Force it will be a matter of releasing such strong forces for the eastern campaign in support of the Army that a quick completion of the ground operations can be counted on and that damage to eastern German territory by enemy air attacks will be as slight as possible.
    ….

    I shall order the concentration against Soviet Russia possibly 8 weeks before the intended beginning of operations.

    ……

    Preparations requiring more time to get under way are to be started now – if this has not yet been done – and are to be completed by 15 May 1941.

    It is of decisive importance, however, that the intention to attack does not become discernible.
    …………….

    View post on imgur.com

  • @Patrick McNally
    @truthor

    > This is untrue as Churchill noted that the cause of the war was the fact that Germany was upsetting the apple cart in its debt free and bartering economy which threatened the international banking system of international Jewry.

    Churchill never said anything of the sort.

    https://gizmodo.com/9-quotes-from-winston-churchill-that-are-totally-fake-1790585636

    -----
    This quote appears to have been invented in 2001 and inserted into the foreword to a new edition of a book first written in 1938, Propaganda in the Next War. Since the book is out of copyright and the original author is dead, the new foreword could’ve been written by any lunatic with an account on a self-publishing site.

    All we know for sure is that the quote doesn’t appear anywhere before 2001.
    -----

    Replies: @John Wear, @Truth Vigilante

    You write: “Churchill never said anything of the sort.”

    My response: Udo Walendy on page 276 of his book “Truth for Germany” wrote that American General Robert E. Wood stated at a Senate committee that Churchill had said to him in November 1936:

    “Germany is getting too strong, and we must smash her.”

    Udo Walendy’s sources for this quote are:

    1) J.F.C. Fuller, Decisive Battles of the Western World, vol. III, p. 369;

    2) Emrys Hughes, Winston Churchill–British Bulldog–His Career in War and Peace, New York 1955, p. 145; and

    3) “Hearings on Lend and Lease,” February 1941, p. 275.

    Udo Walendy also quotes from a conversation Churchill had with the High Commissioner of the League of Nations, Carl J. Burckhardt, at the beginning of 1937:

    “Churchill was telling me that Germany was again getting too strong, the Germans were only impressed by power; in the event of an armed conflict, the excessive encroachments of National Socialism would help the British to a strong system of alliances.” (Source: C.J. Burckhardt, Meine Danziger Mission 1937-1939, p. 70).

    •ï¿½Thanks: The Old Philosopher, HdC
    •ï¿½Replies: @Patrick McNally
    @John Wear

    The quotes which you allege have a very different tone to them from the claims about "debt free ... economy ... banking." A statement like "Germany is getting too strong" is simply a reference to military strength, independent of economics. Churchill was certainly aware of the German military build-up. 1936 was an important year because that was when Hjalmar Schacht decided that the German military had achieved enough for a basic defense. From that point on, Schacht argued that Germany needed to know give more attention to conventional economics, i.e., development of export trade.

    Instead, Hitler resolved to accelerate the military build-up with the intent of achieving expansion within a few years. This greatly stressed the German economy, since a large portion of labor was focused on non-productive military industries. Churchill never made any statements which indicated a high respect for the German economy outside of military applications.
  • anonymous[242] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:

    If somehow Germany had won
    it would have been worn down by the kosher parasitism eventually.

    It appears the inevitable cycle–like a flea infestation on a dog.

  • @truthor
    Many, if not most of Mr. Parker’s claims are simply not true except in a simplistic way.

    “These claims [to Danzig and Posen] were ultimately a principal if not the principal catalyst for the outbreak of war when Germany invaded Poland in 1939…â€

    This is untrue as Churchill noted that the cause of the war was the fact that Germany was upsetting the apple cart in its debt free and bartering economy which threatened the international banking system of international Jewry. They recognized immediately that Hitler was their enemy and they had to destroy him, and that was the reason for the 1933 Declaration of War against Germany.

    “And the notion that Austrians are a distinct nationality separate and apart from Germany is somewhat dubious, as the difference in dialect, customs and so on is no more pronounced than certain other regions in Germany…â€

    Very true. One might speak of the Germanies rather than Germany per se. Austria is simply one of the many German states which became divided between the Kingdom of Prussia and the Austrian Empire. Originally the Holy Roman Empire encompassed all the various German states, which fragmented and then were consolidated under either Austrian or Prussian suzerainty. Thus, the anschluss was actually a reunification of the Germanies into the Prussian German State, with its various duchies, principalities, etc. Hitler actually created the modern German state by getting rid of these and making federal states. Of course, Austria was ripped from Germany proper in 1945.

    “The aftermath of the Sudetenland crisis, in which Hitler partitioned the rest of Czechoslovakia between the Reich and a newly formed puppet state of Slovakia in March of 1939, is the first outrage for which Hitler is rightly condemned.â€

    Untrue. The Czech state was a frankenstein multi-ethnic state created by Versailles (much the same as Poland) with German, Czechs, Slovaks, Poles, and Hungarians within it. When Germany saved the persecuted German minority, Poland and Hungary wanted their citizens back as well. Thus The Czech state was collapsing, and did collapse after Slovakia declared their independence. So Czechia asked Hitler to become a Protectorate and did so.

    As Parker notes “Germany did not have legitimate territorial claims on the rest of Czechoslovakia, namely Bohemia and Moravia.†Which is true, but Germany did not absorb Bohemia and Moravia (i.e. Czechia) they accepted it as a German Protectorate which was not subject to German laws, were not drafted, and basically sat the war out in peace.

    So Parker’s conclusions from this “grab†for land bears no truth. Likewise it did not alienate Britain, which had determined to go to war against Germany, but not in 1938 because their defense industry was not yet strong enough.

    “Manstein’s masterstroke, the Sichelschnitt.†It was shown that this was, in fact, Hitler’s plan, but he had trouble selling it to the General Staff. When Manstein presented his plan, which was basically the same as Hitler’s, Hitler could sell it to the General Staff.

    “A pity that such a spectacular victory sowed the seeds of such catastrophic ruin and defeat, largely due to the blunders and shortcomings of Adolf Hitler.â€

    This is untrue. The war was lost, not because of Hitler’s “blunders and shortcomingsâ€, but because of traitors within the nobility who sabotaged Hitler’s plans, poisoned him during the invasion of Russia, and through high treason sold out Germany to the Allies for their pieces of silver. Not to mention some 80 attempts to kill their legitimate leader.

    Mr. Parker should acquaint himself with the work of Prof. Dr. David Hoggan, and modern scholarship on this subject.

    Replies: @Patrick McNally, @The Old Philosopher, @Carolyn Yeager

    > This is untrue as Churchill noted that the cause of the war was the fact that Germany was upsetting the apple cart in its debt free and bartering economy which threatened the international banking system of international Jewry.

    Churchill never said anything of the sort.

    https://gizmodo.com/9-quotes-from-winston-churchill-that-are-totally-fake-1790585636

    —–
    This quote appears to have been invented in 2001 and inserted into the foreword to a new edition of a book first written in 1938, Propaganda in the Next War. Since the book is out of copyright and the original author is dead, the new foreword could’ve been written by any lunatic with an account on a self-publishing site.

    All we know for sure is that the quote doesn’t appear anywhere before 2001.
    —–

    •ï¿½Replies: @John Wear
    @Patrick McNally

    You write: "Churchill never said anything of the sort."

    My response: Udo Walendy on page 276 of his book "Truth for Germany" wrote that American General Robert E. Wood stated at a Senate committee that Churchill had said to him in November 1936:

    "Germany is getting too strong, and we must smash her."

    Udo Walendy's sources for this quote are:

    1) J.F.C. Fuller, Decisive Battles of the Western World, vol. III, p. 369;

    2) Emrys Hughes, Winston Churchill--British Bulldog--His Career in War and Peace, New York 1955, p. 145; and

    3) "Hearings on Lend and Lease," February 1941, p. 275.

    Udo Walendy also quotes from a conversation Churchill had with the High Commissioner of the League of Nations, Carl J. Burckhardt, at the beginning of 1937:

    "Churchill was telling me that Germany was again getting too strong, the Germans were only impressed by power; in the event of an armed conflict, the excessive encroachments of National Socialism would help the British to a strong system of alliances." (Source: C.J. Burckhardt, Meine Danziger Mission 1937-1939, p. 70).

    Replies: @Patrick McNally
    , @Truth Vigilante
    @Patrick McNally

    Patrick 'Shlomo' McNally writes:

    Churchill never said anything of the sort.
    �
    Well, it looks like John Wear has slapped you down once more (refer to his comment # 304).
    It could well be in the three figure territory that John Wear, through countless hammerings he's dished out your way over the years, where he exposed you as a BALD-FACED LIAR.

    And in return, you have not refuted A SINGLE THING that John Wear has ever posted.
    Shlomo, you really are a glutton for punishment. You just keep lying and posting Jewish talking points.
    Why don't you sit back, relax, and learn TRUE HISTORY from Mr Wear?

    Surely that would be a better option than getting battered to a pulp day in and day out, after being exposed yet again as a peddler of falsehoods?
  • @Alden
    @Dimitrie

    Thank you truth and reality on this Hitler Admiration Society site. From someone who knows the era and the German behavior in the occupied countries.Ukrainians welcomed the German Army for a few months. Because the Germans treated them far worse than the Soviets did The soviets viewed dissidents as class enemies bourgeoisie Not sub humans. As the Germans did.

    Poland all the memoirs show the Russians treated the Poles far far worse than the Germans did. The Russian atheists didn’t even execute Catholic priests as the Germans did. First mass excursions at the railroad town of Auschwitz October 1939 5,000 Catholic priests Germans detained on their way into Poland.

    Hitler, Norway to the north and west Egypt to the south Russia to the east. As if an American midwestern state tried to conquer the other 49 states plus Canada Mexico and Central America. 21 years after losing a similar war. A genius

    This site, Hitler, who lost a war and gave half of Germany and 11 other countries to Germany was the greatest man of the 20th century l Not Spanish General Franco who fought the soviets and Jews and won his war . Franco the greatest man of the 20th century.

    This site it’s really 1325 AD not 2025 AD Gregorian calendar was created some unknown time between 400 and 600 AD, not 1582.

    The 1968 Moon Landing never happened, filmed in a movie studio. A very small studio hidden away in a forest in the east west mountains bisecting Los Angeles The Santa Monica Mountains.

    Hitler was elected president of Germany in the 1932 election. Not appointed by the president several months later after intense political maneuvering . Said assertion by Americans who don’t know the difference between the American system and the European Parliament system.

    Playwright wasn’t Shakespeare based on one book the author read. Alias Shakespeare written by a man, Joe Sobran who knew nothing of Shakespeare or 1500s England. A clip and paste book hurriedly cobbled together from other books written by authors who knew nothing of 1500s England. And didn’t read the plays either. Authors who believe the Merchant of Venice was Shylock the money lender not Antonio the man who who borrowed the money

    Replies: @Dimitrie

    Spain under Francisco Franco was the only country which won in XX century against the flow. He put a solid start for Spain.

    Franco, nearing the end of his life, predicted what would happen after his death: ‘Spain will go a long way down the road that [the West] wants: democracy, pornography, drugs and so on. There will be a lot of crazy things but nothing terminal.’ I hope his right with nothing terminal.

    He also added how that is so sure, ‘Because I’m leaving something that I didn’t find on taking over the government of this country 40 years ago: the Spanish middle class… There won’t be another civil war.’

    I 2019 remains of Franco were removed from the Valley of the Fallen. That’s speaks a lot about the gratitude of kings (Felipe has the crown because Franco enthroned his father) and peoples alike.

    Remind me of the Kipling verses:

    Take up the White Man’s burden—
    And reap his old reward:
    The blame of those ye better,
    The hate of those ye guard
    —

    •ï¿½Thanks: Belis60
    •ï¿½Replies: @Poupon Marx
    @Dimitrie

    Thanks. I have cited Franco as one of Spain's excellent heroes and saviors. Same with Generalissimo Augusto Pinochet. After departing, both countries were again suffused with the same rodents and cucarachas. Same vermin. I visited Spain under Franco in the 70s. Beautiful and prosperous. Same with Brazil under the Generals. Safe, calm, and expanding economy [given the low IQ population of Brazil, much of which is a suburb of Africa].
  • @Truth Vigilante
    @Dimitrie


    You do realize that Hitler was not a martyr who’s seed someday may bring fruits but a statesman who had the power and utterly fail?
    �
    What I do realise Dimitrie, is that you likely have either a Jewish or Slavic axe to grind and thus have been denigrating Hitler unfairly.

    As for the 'achievement of the defeated ones', Hitler and the Germans of the first half of the 20th century have produced a template that all of us can follow in our never ending efforts to bring about the demise of ZOG.
    THAT is an achievement that will be spoken about for millennia.
    You Dimitrie may be unaware of what you're doing in the capacity of a useful idiot who unknowingly (or perhaps knowingly?) advances ZOG's agenda.

    Hopefully, for your sake, one day you may accumulate the necessary life experience to reflect back on how foolish you were in the past.
    Then you'll acknowledge the sacrifices Hitler and the German people made so that we too may be freed from the tentacles of the Vampire Squid (aka the Talmudic financiers that control the entirety of the western financial and political systems).

    Replies: @Poupon Marx, @Dimitrie

    Glad to see that you responded objective to my points: ZOG is responsible that Hitler didn’t took Britain in 1940 and start a ethnic cleansing in the East.

    Now it’s all crystal clear

  • @Quinn
    @Poupon Marx

    Nice bear story.

    I'm a scientist by nature, have a 140+ IQ, and my stated opinion/conclusion is valid and inescapable. I dont pretend to be an exhaustively scholarly researcher, but im very good at spotting patterns and formulating or disproving theories with logic, even with incomplete information (I spot BS very quickly). In fact, much seemingly relevant information is often superfluous. Nothing in your pedantic musings invalidates my concise executive summary information.

    There is ample non-mainstream and suppressed information available today that fully proves my contention. Germany needed to be stopped by International Jewry, for they would have brought an end to the Jewish power that has dominated the world for centuries, simply by bringing light to it. It's as simple as that. Even with their defeat, their struggle proved the truth. None of this patent fact excuses Germans or any politician of responsibility for human failings or poor choices. But Germany literally had a choice between fight, or be cucked/enslaved/slaughtered.

    Germany's loss of WW2 has left the world in quite a state today. And the true culprits of WW1, WW2 and other major wars of the last 100+ years, are going fully mask off. The fact is, Jews and Zionism have dominated this world for centuries via the British Empire first, and now the JUSA Empire. It could not be more apparent prima facie. Germany tried to escape that prison, amd was punished.

    Replies: @Poupon Marx

    Your stated conclusion, via the process you describe is not a scientific one. It is highly inferential, and indirect, far removed in origin from today, and many if not all live sources are dead. This is NOT forensic evidence, e.g., pottery shards, DNA, writing, etc. These are observations from human beings. I should not have to tell you the built in low confidence level and fragility upon relying solely on recitations, memoirs, and group consensus.

    I don’t know your scientific field, but I doubt it is a STEM one. You do not display healthy skepticism and objectivity. And you completely fail to address my concerns, ipso facto, that all events of this dimension have multiple antecedents. Your credentials are irrelevant, though of peripheral concern.

    The Germans were the fertile soils where Amschel and his brothers first convened with other financial Jews to pool their monies and “take over the World”. Over centuries, Germany not only assisted with the germination of these Parasites, but provided them with resources at the cost of their own populations commonweal. And then finally when they have gained strength, like the movie Alien the body burst from the belly of the host.

    You should read the servile, lickspittle, and abject concession of the Europeans to the Rothchilds in the 19th century, and their extracted wealth.

    Finally, to me you display an intellectual smugness and sloth. Your analysis and explanation does not match who and what you say you are. Think like an epidemiologist or a marine engineer like me. I once had an essential piece of equipment that failed and had two causes, independent and unrelated simultaneously fail. In the future, don’t worry. AI will do everything for you.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Tiptoethrutulips
    @Poupon Marx


    This is NOT forensic evidence, e.g., pottery shards, DNA, writing, etc. These are observations from human beings
    �
    Are there any writings that can’t be classified as observations from human beings?

    Is there NO forensic evidence that refutes the official narratives of WW2/so-called Holocaust? Is there any forensic evidence that supports the so-called Holocaust? What, then, is/was the point of creating such a fantastic story with essentially no forensic evidence, but gobs of “personal observations?â€

    How has the concocted tale been maintained/protected from scrutiny?

    that all events of this dimension have multiple antecedents
    �
    No one denies this, meine Kröte. But, was there something elemental, beyond just human nature, at the core of the 20th century conflicts?

    Germany not only assisted with the germination of these Parasites, but provided them with resources at the cost of their own populations commonweal. And then finally when they have gained strength, like the movie Alien the body burst from the belly of the host.
    �
    No, not “Germany,†just like not all Americans support Israel; the truth of “Israel†and their shenanigans is obscured/unknown, generally, and have you been reading Mein Kampf again?

    You should read the servile, lickspittle, and abject concession of the Europeans to the Rothchilds in the 19th century, and their extracted wealth.
    �
    Did anyone in Europe try to stop this madness? I wonder….

    a marine engineer like me. I once had an essential piece of equipment that failed and had two causes,
    �
    1. Whiskey swilling.
    2. Lack of oversight due to excessive pining-away over that blonde steward who rejected you.

    Long afloat on shipless oceans…

    Now my foolish boat is leaning
    Broken lovelorn on your rocks

    Replies: @Poupon Marx
  • @Mike Tre
    @John Wear

    I have sort of an offhand question for you: Was "The Austrian Corporal" how Hitler's subordinates actually referred to him behind his back, at the time? Or was that slur a post facto fabrication?

    Replies: @Phil Barker

    It’s difficult to say who did and who didn’t refer to Hitler in such a way during the war, but obviously at least some officers must have. After all, there were a few planned assassination attempts by some of the generals, and probably more officers were at least vaguely aware of such plots even though they escaped arrest. However, not all the generals felt that way, the most obvious examples being Generals Jodl and Keitel. They maintained a high opinion of Hitler and worked with him daily. Field Marshall Manstein also appears to have had some respect for Hitler’s abilities, while also maintaining some important criticisms. Even though Field Marshall Rommel was suspected of being part of an assassination plot, he also had much esteem for Hitler. There’s also some evidence that Admirals Raeder and Donitz thought highly of Hitler, so it was at least a mixed bag. It also stands to reason that in an attempt to preserve the army and disassociate it from the Nuremberg trials, many officers did throw Hitler under the bus after the war.

    •ï¿½Thanks: Mike Tre
  • truthor says:

    Many, if not most of Mr. Parker’s claims are simply not true except in a simplistic way.

    “These claims [to Danzig and Posen] were ultimately a principal if not the principal catalyst for the outbreak of war when Germany invaded Poland in 1939…â€

    This is untrue as Churchill noted that the cause of the war was the fact that Germany was upsetting the apple cart in its debt free and bartering economy which threatened the international banking system of international Jewry. They recognized immediately that Hitler was their enemy and they had to destroy him, and that was the reason for the 1933 Declaration of War against Germany.

    “And the notion that Austrians are a distinct nationality separate and apart from Germany is somewhat dubious, as the difference in dialect, customs and so on is no more pronounced than certain other regions in Germany…â€

    Very true. One might speak of the Germanies rather than Germany per se. Austria is simply one of the many German states which became divided between the Kingdom of Prussia and the Austrian Empire. Originally the Holy Roman Empire encompassed all the various German states, which fragmented and then were consolidated under either Austrian or Prussian suzerainty. Thus, the anschluss was actually a reunification of the Germanies into the Prussian German State, with its various duchies, principalities, etc. Hitler actually created the modern German state by getting rid of these and making federal states. Of course, Austria was ripped from Germany proper in 1945.

    “The aftermath of the Sudetenland crisis, in which Hitler partitioned the rest of Czechoslovakia between the Reich and a newly formed puppet state of Slovakia in March of 1939, is the first outrage for which Hitler is rightly condemned.â€

    Untrue. The Czech state was a frankenstein multi-ethnic state created by Versailles (much the same as Poland) with German, Czechs, Slovaks, Poles, and Hungarians within it. When Germany saved the persecuted German minority, Poland and Hungary wanted their citizens back as well. Thus The Czech state was collapsing, and did collapse after Slovakia declared their independence. So Czechia asked Hitler to become a Protectorate and did so.

    As Parker notes “Germany did not have legitimate territorial claims on the rest of Czechoslovakia, namely Bohemia and Moravia.†Which is true, but Germany did not absorb Bohemia and Moravia (i.e. Czechia) they accepted it as a German Protectorate which was not subject to German laws, were not drafted, and basically sat the war out in peace.

    So Parker’s conclusions from this “grab†for land bears no truth. Likewise it did not alienate Britain, which had determined to go to war against Germany, but not in 1938 because their defense industry was not yet strong enough.

    “Manstein’s masterstroke, the Sichelschnitt.†It was shown that this was, in fact, Hitler’s plan, but he had trouble selling it to the General Staff. When Manstein presented his plan, which was basically the same as Hitler’s, Hitler could sell it to the General Staff.

    “A pity that such a spectacular victory sowed the seeds of such catastrophic ruin and defeat, largely due to the blunders and shortcomings of Adolf Hitler.â€

    This is untrue. The war was lost, not because of Hitler’s “blunders and shortcomingsâ€, but because of traitors within the nobility who sabotaged Hitler’s plans, poisoned him during the invasion of Russia, and through high treason sold out Germany to the Allies for their pieces of silver. Not to mention some 80 attempts to kill their legitimate leader.

    Mr. Parker should acquaint himself with the work of Prof. Dr. David Hoggan, and modern scholarship on this subject.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Patrick McNally
    @truthor

    > This is untrue as Churchill noted that the cause of the war was the fact that Germany was upsetting the apple cart in its debt free and bartering economy which threatened the international banking system of international Jewry.

    Churchill never said anything of the sort.

    https://gizmodo.com/9-quotes-from-winston-churchill-that-are-totally-fake-1790585636

    -----
    This quote appears to have been invented in 2001 and inserted into the foreword to a new edition of a book first written in 1938, Propaganda in the Next War. Since the book is out of copyright and the original author is dead, the new foreword could’ve been written by any lunatic with an account on a self-publishing site.

    All we know for sure is that the quote doesn’t appear anywhere before 2001.
    -----

    Replies: @John Wear, @Truth Vigilante
    , @The Old Philosopher
    @truthor

    Notes:

    This is untrue as Churchill noted that the cause of the war was the fact that Germany was upsetting the apple cart in its debt free and bartering economy which threatened the international banking system of international Jewry. They recognized immediately that Hitler was their enemy and they had to destroy him, and that was the reason for the 1933 Declaration of War against Germany.
    �
    Exactly right on the money.

    It's probably what prompted the Milner group to reevaluate at the last minute their plot to push Germany into a war with Russia as Quigley recounts the events.

    All anyone has to do to figure out the driving force behind the Brits using Poland as their excuse for launching a war against German is the difference between the condition of Germany's economy in 21939 and the depression both England and US continued to be mired in as reflected in economic statistics.

    Indeed, the US today under TRump is seeking to turn itself into a variant of national socialism that Hitler proclaimed that is at bottom a union between capitalist corporations and the state. The only real difference is that under Hitler's national socialism, the national part was the predominant force as reflected by Hitler exercising primary power, whereas in the US it's the corporate power that predominates.
    , @Carolyn Yeager
    @truthor


    “Manstein’s masterstroke, the Sichelschnitt.†It was shown that this was, in fact, Hitler’s plan, but he had trouble selling it to the General Staff. When Manstein presented his plan, which was basically the same as Hitler’s, Hitler could sell it to the General Staff.
    �
    Thank you, Truthor, for stating that "Manstein's Plan" was Hitler's Plan, which AH had designed in greater detail before Manstein told him about his own plan! According to Hitler's friend & architect, Hermann Geisler, the Fuehrer had already been secretly working on the plan and it was far advanced in tactical details by the time Manstein reported his similar plan to AH in the middle of February, 1940. But Hitler was thrilled that Manstein saw it the same way; that gave him even more confidence in his own conclusions. Read it in Hitler's own words in Giesler's memoir Ein Anderer Hitler, 1977, Druffel-Verlag or in Wilhelm Kriessmann's English translation "The Artist Within the Warlord," 3rd edition August 2018, pp. 43-45.
    "I still kept silent ... It would not have been prudent to let Manstein know how far advanced beyond the basic strategic concept the tactical details had already been worked out." p. 45

    The war was lost, not because of Hitler’s “blunders and shortcomingsâ€, but because of traitors within the nobility who sabotaged Hitler’s plans, poisoned him during the invasion of Russia, and through high treason sold out Germany to the Allies for their pieces of silver.
    �
    This is provably true, and should be emphasized more than it is. See Chapt. 7, pp. 115-122 in the above mentioned translation "The Artist Within the Warlord." Again, thank you for doing so.
  • Belis60 says:
    @Bankotsu
    @TheAntidoteToToxins


    Years ago I heard the story of a former Hitler Youth who said, “If Hitler had stopped after Czechoslovakia he would have gone into the history books as the greatest German stateman of all time.â€
    �
    I agree with that. If Hitler had died in April 1939, he would had gone down as one of the greatest German rulers of all time. But he died in April 1945.


    Postwar Testimony Christa Schroeder and Gerda Daranowski:

    "Well children!", Hitler exclaimed. "Now put one here and one here," tapping his cheeks; "One peck each! This is the most wonderful day of my life. I have now accomplished what other strove in vain for centuries to achieve. Bohemia and Moravia are back in the Reich. I will go down as the greatest German of all times."

    https://web.archive.org/web/20140808010624/https://www2.bc.edu/~heineman/roadiii.html


    Hitler mistake was to invade Poland. There was no reason for him to do so. None at all. Britain had already accepted German domination of eastern Europe and wanted to negotiate spheres of influence agreement with Germany and to ditch the Polish guarantee but Hitler wanted war for war's sake. Hitler didn't think that UK would fight over Poland after the surrender of Czechoslovakia at Munich. So a war over Poland would be a small limited war that would wipe out the shame of German defeat in WWI and display German military power again for everyone to see.


    11 August 1939: Ribbentrop is evasive whenever I ask him for particulars about the German line of action. His conscience bothers him. He has lied too many times about German intentions toward Poland not to feel uneasy now about what he must tell me and what they are getting ready to do.

    The decision to fight is implacable.
    He rejects any solution which might give satisfaction to Germany and thus avoid the struggle. I am certain that even if the Germans were given more than they ask for they would attack just the same, because they are possessed by the demon of destruction....

    Before dinner, in a casual atmosphere, Ciano tried to pin Ribbentrop down.

    While we were waiting to be seated at the dinner table, Ribbentrop informed me that the storm must break, as he would have talked with me of a minor, ordinary administrative measure. "Well, Ribbentrop," I asked, "what do you want? The Corridor or Danzig?"

    "Not that any more," he said, gazing at me with his cold expressionless eyes, "we want war!"

    12 August 1939: Hitler is very cordial, but he, too, is impassive and implacable in his decision.... I realize immediately that there is no longer anything that can be done. He has decided to strike, and strike he will. All our arguments will not in the least avail to stop him. he continues to repeat that he will localize the conflict with Poland, but his affirmation that the great war must be fought while he and the Duce are still young leads me to believe once more that he is acting in bad faith.

    13 August 1939 Weizsäcker Diary Entry

    In the past weeks, there has been growing here strongly a desire for war. Himmler, Ribbentrop, and Gauleiter Forster (Danzig) have each been promoting the idea of war in their own spheres.
    Ribbentrop says he will guarantee English and French neutrality, provided we administer annihilating blows to the Poles in the first three days of fighting. This he thinks is certain.


    22 August 1939 Engel Diary Entry

    The Führer repeated that he now looked more quietly upon developments than he had for some months. The fronts were now drawn, and the other side can choose. His greatest fear is that some "stupid emotional acrobat would approach him with weak-kneed proposals" in the last minute and thus destroy his whole game plan and force him once again to give in.


    24 August 1939 Helmuth Groscurth Diary Entry

    Reported to Frankenberg and then to the chief (Canaris) and Tippelskirch. It seems that the war against Poland is fixed for the 26th. The chief showed me for two hours long his diaries, and especially his notes that he had taken from the Führer's speech before the commanding generals. He is done in by it. Everything in it is lies, and deceptions, not a single element of truth....

    The Führer insisted that we could only hold out as we are now for a very few years, and so we must now conquer. Only he and the Duce are capable of this. But either one of them could "on any day and at any hour be destroyed by a criminal or an idiot." Therefore, he was forced to act quickly.



    29 August 1939 Engel Diary Entry

    But if the other side was so dumb as to bring one about, then they bore the responsibility and must be crushed. He only desired a (limited) "First Silesian War" (i.e. Frederick the Great's brief war which captured Silesia from Maria Theresa of Austria), nothing more; for the newly created flags of the Armed Forces;an armed force which he had formed;need some victory ribbons, or otherwise the idea of a glorious army has lost its meaning.



    25 February 1939 Helmuth Groscurth Diary Entry

    Visit Berlin ... In the morning a visit to the office and talk with the Admiral [Canaris], Radke, and Oster. The Admiral appeared very nervous and depressed... Oster showed me a written account of the Führer's latest talk before the commanding generals...

    According to this, he had been forced in September to pull back and thus had not been able to reach his goal. He has to lead a war in his lifetime, for never again will a German leader enjoy such unlimited confidence of the people, and thus only he is capable of a war. His war aims: a) domination of Europe; b) world pre-eminence for centuries. War must be undertaken soon because of the armaments pace of the other powers. The officer corps must unconditionally stand behind him, even should the party, etc. break away. The commanding generals must swear allegiance with drawn daggers...

    23 August 1939 Weizsäcker Diary Entry

    Since Herr von Ribbentrop has flown to Moscow, I participated in the preparation and course of the Führer's conversation with the British Ambassador.... The goal of the Führer was directed toward getting the British government to drop its guarantee for Poland. The Führer expects that by 24 August, under the impact of our coup in Moscow, the Chamberlain government will fall, and with it the idea of a guarantee of Poland.

    My own judgment of events is quite different, and I explained it to the Führer in the following words: the English are prisoners of their own politics. They are neither a logical nor a systematic peoples, but rather emotional, and must be understood accordingly. Psychologically, they are, so to speak, under the influence of Whiskey. Whatever they do cannot be judged solely as tactics, etc. etc. If Chamberlain wishes, he could give out a call for war, and have the entire Parliament behind him.

    The Führer does not agree with this version. He is pointed more directly than ever at war, and shows no hesitation in his determination to have a war.
    Furthermore, he expects the war to be only a local one with Poland, but he does speak;at least he did today;of being able to conduct a general war. Only a few days ago, he was of quite a different opinion.

    https://web.archive.org/web/20140806011341/https://www2.bc.edu/~heineman/roadiv.html
    https://web.archive.org/web/20140815094039/https://www2.bc.edu/~heineman/origins.html

    "...The German Foreign Ministry memorandum on this conversation makes it perfectly clear that the Germans did not misunderstand Halifax except, possibly, on the last point.

    There they failed to see that if Germany made war, the British Government would be forced into the war against Germany by public opinion in England. The German diplomatic agents in London, especially the Ambassador, Dirksen, saw this clearly, but the Government in Berlin listened only to the blind and conceited ignorance of Ribbentrop.

    As dictators themselves, unfamiliar with the British social or constitutional systems, the German rulers assumed that the willingness of the British Government to accept the liquidation of Austria, Czechoslovakia, and Poland implied that the British Government would never go to war to prevent this liquidation.


    They did not see that the British Government might have to declare war to stay in office if public opinion in Britain were sufficiently aroused.
    The British Government saw this difficulty and as a last resort were prepared to declare war but not to wage war on Germany.

    This distinction was not clear to the Germans and was not accepted by the inner core of the Milner Group. It was, however, accepted by the other elements in the government, like Chamberlain himself, and by much of the second circle of the Milner Group, including Simon, Hoare, and probably Halifax.

    It was this which resulted in the “phony war†from September 1939 to April 1940...

    https://web.archive.org/web/20221029210347/http://www.yamaguchy.com/library/quigley/anglo_12b.html





    The efforts of the Chamberlain group to continue the policy of appeasement by making economic and other concessions to Germany and their efforts to get Hitler to agree to a four-power pact form one of the most shameful episodes in the history of recent British diplomacy.


    These negotiations were chiefly conducted through Sir Horace Wilson and consisted chiefly of offers of colonial bribes and other concessions to Germany. These offers were either rejected or ignored by the Nazis.

    ...If, by means of another Munich, he could have obtained a German-Polish settlement that would satisfy Germany and avoid war, he would have taken it. It was the hope of such an agreement that prevented him from making any real agreement with Russia, for it was, apparently, the expectation of the British government that if the Germans could get the Polish Corridor by negotiation, they could then drive into Russia across the Baltic States. For this reason, in the negotiations with Russia, Halifax refused any multilateral pact against aggression, any guarantee of the Baltic States, or any tripartite guarantee of Poland. Instead, he sought to get nothing more than a unilateral Russian guarantee to Poland to match the British guarantee to the same country. This was much too dangerous for Russia to swallow, since it would leave her with a commitment which could lead to war and with no promise of British aid to her if she were attacked directly, after a Polish settlement, or indirectly across the Baltic States.

    Only after the German Soviet Non-aggression Pact of 21 August 1939 did Halifax implement the unilateral guarantee to Poland with a more formal mutual assistance pact between Britain and Poland. This was done to warn Hitler that an attack on Poland would bring Britain into the war under pressure of British public opinion. Hitler, as usual, paid no attention to Britain. Even after the German attack on Poland, the British government was reluctant to fulfill this pact and spent almost three days asking the Germans to return to negotiation.

    Even after the British were forced to declare war on Germany, they made no effort to fight,
    contenting themselves with dropping leaflets on Germany. We now know that the German generals had moved so much of their forces to the east that they were gravely worried at the effects which might follow an Allied attack on western Germany or even an aerial bombing of the Ruhr...

    https://web.archive.org/web/20221029210347/http://www.yamaguchy.com/library/quigley/anglo_12b.html

    Replies: @Truth Vigilante, @Belis60

    Well, you could have added that Mussolini and Ciano clearly told Hitler they were 100% sure that an attack to Poland would have started WW2.
    Not only, Mussolini and Ciano the 1st of September started frenetic multilateral contacts to launch the proposal of an immediate cease fire and a diplomatic conference. The 3rd of September -obtorto collo- Hitler gave his consent.
    The negotiation failed because GB requested not only a cease fire, but also the retreat of German troops.
    A classic example of when the better is surely the enemy of good….you need to be really false, twisted and hypocritical, a BrUtish classic, like declaring war to Germany in 1914 “to defend the neutrality of Belgium”, or firing Boris Johnson ” because he drank at Downing Street”.
    The Brits are always false, hypocritical, stone faced liars.

    •ï¿½Agree: The Old Philosopher
  • @geokat62
    @Anonymous534


    If Hitler is National Socialism and vice versa, then fuck them both. Their brands must be left behind for any non-LARP purposes.
    �
    "Hitler will emerge from the hatred that surrounds him now as one of the most significant figures who ever lived. He had in him the stuff of which legends are made." - JFK

    Replies: @Anonymous534

    Sure, any day now. Two more weeks.

    •ï¿½Replies: @geokat62
    @Anonymous534


    Sure, any day now. Two more weeks.
    �
    Something tells me this comment won’t age well. But, only time will tell.
  • Quinn says:
    @Poupon Marx
    @Quinn

    Intellectually, people like you are underwhelming and tend to be influenced too much by collective thoughts, ideas, doctrines, memes, etc. All this is like bar talk at Wesley's Wimpy Bar on Slacker Court. The alley in back reeks because the patrons cannot brave the stench of the restrooms, whose cleaning last date is beyond memory.

    I Real Life, causes>effects>causes, etc. go on and on and are vectored frequently from more than one source or direction. Thus, to arrive at Germany's choices requires a broadening of the search for causative and affective agents. This takes work and broad knowledge, sometimes across several disciplines. So go back to Bismark. Was it necessary for the all the principalities to be unified? Under one authority and command? Did the "German Character" of martial tradition contribute to the preceding wars and booty of the past before WW II? Could have WW I been avoided by prescience and prediction and calculation?

    Is Germany a passive agent flotsam upon the roiling sea that had no locomotive will or agency to maneuver itself outside of contingent factors or the immediate causal phenomenon? The answer is: of course it did. It just didn't have wise enough leaders. Politicians are usually mediocre people who are crowd pleasers. They lack wisdom, especially in contrast to ambition and fame and power.

    When I used to camp, I was told early never to have food inside the tent you are sleeping in. Suspend it from a tree. My first wife and I were camping in Yosemite and only left an unopened jar of mayonnaise on the picnic table. A big black bear opened the vacuum lid and tongued out the mayo. Then he sniffed around our tent. His huge. form was silhouetted against the sides of the tent from the street light. I signaled to my wife not to make a sound and not to move. The smell of the bear was enough to induce expectoration. However, the bear left.

    Like many other phenomena and real events, "inevitable", the use of this adjective is to easily used and applied. This is your lax and relaxed context here. "Germany didn't have any choice!!!". Sure, if they were asleep for 50 years and just moved into a neighborhood they were unfamiliar with.

    Like so many other people, you assume and consume and exhale the accepted palaver and constellation of cliches and worn out, soggy, moldy blankets to wrap your superficial opinions in.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mgn2rFHvn2k

    Keep a-moving on......

    Replies: @Quinn

    Nice bear story.

    I’m a scientist by nature, have a 140+ IQ, and my stated opinion/conclusion is valid and inescapable. I dont pretend to be an exhaustively scholarly researcher, but im very good at spotting patterns and formulating or disproving theories with logic, even with incomplete information (I spot BS very quickly). In fact, much seemingly relevant information is often superfluous. Nothing in your pedantic musings invalidates my concise executive summary information.

    There is ample non-mainstream and suppressed information available today that fully proves my contention. Germany needed to be stopped by International Jewry, for they would have brought an end to the Jewish power that has dominated the world for centuries, simply by bringing light to it. It’s as simple as that. Even with their defeat, their struggle proved the truth. None of this patent fact excuses Germans or any politician of responsibility for human failings or poor choices. But Germany literally had a choice between fight, or be cucked/enslaved/slaughtered.

    Germany’s loss of WW2 has left the world in quite a state today. And the true culprits of WW1, WW2 and other major wars of the last 100+ years, are going fully mask off. The fact is, Jews and Zionism have dominated this world for centuries via the British Empire first, and now the JUSA Empire. It could not be more apparent prima facie. Germany tried to escape that prison, amd was punished.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Poupon Marx
    @Quinn

    Your stated conclusion, via the process you describe is not a scientific one. It is highly inferential, and indirect, far removed in origin from today, and many if not all live sources are dead. This is NOT forensic evidence, e.g., pottery shards, DNA, writing, etc. These are observations from human beings. I should not have to tell you the built in low confidence level and fragility upon relying solely on recitations, memoirs, and group consensus.

    I don't know your scientific field, but I doubt it is a STEM one. You do not display healthy skepticism and objectivity. And you completely fail to address my concerns, ipso facto, that all events of this dimension have multiple antecedents. Your credentials are irrelevant, though of peripheral concern.

    The Germans were the fertile soils where Amschel and his brothers first convened with other financial Jews to pool their monies and "take over the World". Over centuries, Germany not only assisted with the germination of these Parasites, but provided them with resources at the cost of their own populations commonweal. And then finally when they have gained strength, like the movie Alien the body burst from the belly of the host.

    You should read the servile, lickspittle, and abject concession of the Europeans to the Rothchilds in the 19th century, and their extracted wealth.

    Finally, to me you display an intellectual smugness and sloth. Your analysis and explanation does not match who and what you say you are. Think like an epidemiologist or a marine engineer like me. I once had an essential piece of equipment that failed and had two causes, independent and unrelated simultaneously fail. In the future, don't worry. AI will do everything for you.

    Replies: @Tiptoethrutulips
  • @RestiveUs
    @Poupon Marx

    Awwww...Too bad the post didn't meet your expectations, your Pompous Majesty. But you read the entire thing anyway.

    Replies: @Poupon Marx

    And you would eat anything as long as it was dusted with white powdered sugar. What is Truth? Ask the female – or other – in your life when it better to be circumcised or not. That is, if you have the courage and fortitude to receive bad news, and crestfallen consequences.

  • @Tiptoethrutulips
    @Baron

    Inhuman treatment of the Poles? In what way exactly?

    Are you aware of the concentration camp in Poland, Bereza Kartuska?

    Miejsce Odosobnienia w Berezie Kartuskiej, "Place of Isolation at Bereza Kartuska" was operated by Poland's Sanation government from 1934 to 1939 in Bereza Kartuska, Polesie Voivodeship. Because the inmates were detained without trial or conviction, it is considered an internment camp or concentration camp.

    Apparently, Poland wanted certain population groups out of Poland…including Germans.

    There were no homicidal gas chambers in any German labor/transit/concentration camp.

    Magnus Hirschfeld, the famous homosexual Jew/father of transgenderism, and most of his ilk, was/were neither gassed nor killed by the NSDAP. In fact, it was von Papen who began the campaign against public displays of sexual perversion; Adolf Hitler finished the job.

    The policies of the NSDAP towards the disabled/infirm/incurable were NO different than those of most other nations on earth at one time or another. In fact, when the German public objected to certain practices, said policies were amended in deference to the will of the German people.

    Civilians often suffer during times of war/conflict. Are you suggesting that ONLY Germany has ever acted against civilians, whether intentionally (such as partisans) or collaterally, throughout the history of War?

    Replies: @Patrick McNally

    > Are you aware of the concentration camp in Poland, Bereza Kartuska?

    The camp had only a tangential relation to Germans, and this came at the end when Hitler had already occupied Czechia and was now preparing to move into Poland.

    https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miejsce_Odosobnienia_w_Berezie_Kartuskiej

    —–
    In addition to those suspected of subversion and political opponents of the Sanation (especially communists and nationalists), it also imprisoned economic criminals accused of speculation or suspected of such crimes, common criminals – especially repeat offenders, and in the final phase of its existence – suspected of sabotage and spying for the Third Reich…

    Among them were not only activists of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN), the Communist Party of Poland (KPP), the National Radical Camp (ONR), illegal or banned by the Sanation governments, but also people associated with the People’s Party (SL) and the Polish Socialist Party (PPS). The largest group of prisoners were communists – 1400–1500 prisoners out of a total of over 3000[12]. Other sources say that 55% were communists among the prisoners, 4% Ukrainian nationalists, 2% nationalists, 1% people’s activists, 1% Nazi sympathizers, and the rest were “economic harmers”[13].
    —–

  • @Quinn
    @Priss Factor

    Idiots abound around here.

    Hitler's mistake was not quashing Britain at several opportunities, thereby denying a US beachhead, and preventing a western front. Of course, Dunkirk was well before Pearl Harbor, and Hitler's decency and desire for fraternity with his Anglo Saxon "cousins" blinded him to the extent of threat of International Jewry.

    Germany was targeted and slated for destruction by International Jewry. Hitler and Germany were in a literal existential crisis, with agents of zionist Judaism threatening from all sides. All the clowns here who think Hitler was seeking to conquer the world, or that Germany had any choice but to fight, are lost in the Jewish Matrix.

    The holocaust didnt happen, as is well documented and easily disproven along several vectors. Those who continue in this age to give the holohoax credence, can no longer be taken seriously among authentic students of history. Such absurdity is right there with those logically-challenged pundits who think Trump was actually shot in Pennsylvania.

    Replies: @Truth Vigilante, @Poupon Marx

    Intellectually, people like you are underwhelming and tend to be influenced too much by collective thoughts, ideas, doctrines, memes, etc. All this is like bar talk at Wesley’s Wimpy Bar on Slacker Court. The alley in back reeks because the patrons cannot brave the stench of the restrooms, whose cleaning last date is beyond memory.

    I Real Life, causes>effects>causes, etc. go on and on and are vectored frequently from more than one source or direction. Thus, to arrive at Germany’s choices requires a broadening of the search for causative and affective agents. This takes work and broad knowledge, sometimes across several disciplines. So go back to Bismark. Was it necessary for the all the principalities to be unified? Under one authority and command? Did the “German Character” of martial tradition contribute to the preceding wars and booty of the past before WW II? Could have WW I been avoided by prescience and prediction and calculation?

    Is Germany a passive agent flotsam upon the roiling sea that had no locomotive will or agency to maneuver itself outside of contingent factors or the immediate causal phenomenon? The answer is: of course it did. It just didn’t have wise enough leaders. Politicians are usually mediocre people who are crowd pleasers. They lack wisdom, especially in contrast to ambition and fame and power.

    When I used to camp, I was told early never to have food inside the tent you are sleeping in. Suspend it from a tree. My first wife and I were camping in Yosemite and only left an unopened jar of mayonnaise on the picnic table. A big black bear opened the vacuum lid and tongued out the mayo. Then he sniffed around our tent. His huge. form was silhouetted against the sides of the tent from the street light. I signaled to my wife not to make a sound and not to move. The smell of the bear was enough to induce expectoration. However, the bear left.

    Like many other phenomena and real events, “inevitable”, the use of this adjective is to easily used and applied. This is your lax and relaxed context here. “Germany didn’t have any choice!!!”. Sure, if they were asleep for 50 years and just moved into a neighborhood they were unfamiliar with.

    Like so many other people, you assume and consume and exhale the accepted palaver and constellation of cliches and worn out, soggy, moldy blankets to wrap your superficial opinions in.

    Keep a-moving on……

    •ï¿½Replies: @Quinn
    @Poupon Marx

    Nice bear story.

    I'm a scientist by nature, have a 140+ IQ, and my stated opinion/conclusion is valid and inescapable. I dont pretend to be an exhaustively scholarly researcher, but im very good at spotting patterns and formulating or disproving theories with logic, even with incomplete information (I spot BS very quickly). In fact, much seemingly relevant information is often superfluous. Nothing in your pedantic musings invalidates my concise executive summary information.

    There is ample non-mainstream and suppressed information available today that fully proves my contention. Germany needed to be stopped by International Jewry, for they would have brought an end to the Jewish power that has dominated the world for centuries, simply by bringing light to it. It's as simple as that. Even with their defeat, their struggle proved the truth. None of this patent fact excuses Germans or any politician of responsibility for human failings or poor choices. But Germany literally had a choice between fight, or be cucked/enslaved/slaughtered.

    Germany's loss of WW2 has left the world in quite a state today. And the true culprits of WW1, WW2 and other major wars of the last 100+ years, are going fully mask off. The fact is, Jews and Zionism have dominated this world for centuries via the British Empire first, and now the JUSA Empire. It could not be more apparent prima facie. Germany tried to escape that prison, amd was punished.

    Replies: @Poupon Marx