It appears to be still 1-star on the US Amazon.com (though not on the UK), but perhaps it will change. In any case, that is very good of you. I am accustomed to receive 1-star reviews from feminists and the like, but that one stung because it came from someone who seemed to be expressing a message similar to mine. It is one thing to invoke terms like “Communism” if your point is to emphasize the seriousness of the matter or broad affinities with totalitarianism, but I agree that today it can be very misleading, and worse, I believe it is being invoked by conservatives not to fight battles but to avoid them. In fact, I have an article focused specifically on that theme, coming out in a few days in the September issue of Chronicles magazine. I am sure readers there will be interested in your response.

Mr. Baskerville – I have changed my Amazon review of your book from one to four and posted your above response on Amazon to give you the benefit of the doubt.

I have been a real estate appraiser of public utility properties during my occupational career. The biggest ethical violation is to mislead the user of the valuation report. I liken your book to a property appraisal where I valued the property at $1 million under as assumption hidden in the appendix to the report that interest rates will be 30%. But interest rates are, say, 10%. So, my valuation misleads the user of the report. Similarly, you have written about Communism then buried your assumptions, which I believe is misleading.

Under Communism the enemy is some Commissar. Under Socialism the enemy is some politician who want to buy votes by stealing some of what you have and redistribute it to others. Under Fascism it is some Oligarch wanting to destroy your small business to capture your customers for his monopoly. So, you are Commissar hunting when the enemy is an Oligarch.

Allow me to rephrase my statement: they are all the same in their purpose of establishing a fascist, One-World government, with a very few at the top owning and controlling everything and the remainder of the people being their slaves – that is, the ones who are allowed to live.

The various “isms” only differ in their methods of reaching this goal.

Thank you.

But communism, socialism and fascism are NOT the same, except in your mind. As I wrote, Fascism is not an ideology but a way for oligarchs to run the economy in their favor when there is a large economic downturn to protect their monopolies. Sun Tzu wrote you must identify your enemy to win a war. The enemy under Communism is some government militarist or bureaucrat, the enemy under
Socialism is a class of people who want some of what you have, but the enemy under Fascism is a cabal of oligarchs who will stage fake anti-race riots to destroy your small family owned business so that they can capture your customers with online ordering and delivery. I can not be more specific than this. If you still don’t get the difference, we will all burn in hell because of ignorance.

This peevish little man puts words into my mouth and then criticizes me for his words. Nowhere do I blame everything on Communism. In fact, I repeatedly at pains to say precisely the opposite. A literate reader would have understood (as most did) that the quotation marks indicate that I am using the term “Communism” ironically. I make it very clear that I do not believe that “Communismâ€� is the culprit, and any intelligent reader should have understood this: e.g., p. xxvii:, could hardly be more explicit: “One reason for their [conservatives’] defeat is professional conservatives’ self-deception with their with their single-minded crusade against ‘Communism’.”

Part of our predicament is precisely that men like this cannot legally exist anymore, while their “sacred associations� have gone over to the enemy (many feminized churches now pressure male congregants to marry the single mothers in their pews rather than condemning single motherhood).

Interesting�👌
So do not count on the churches.

If only Christ (or St. Paul), a somewhat idiosyncratic bachelor, had not discouraged men from the dedication to becoming married heads of family!!

As for Paul:
Marriage is for those who cannot dedicate themselves fully to Christ. Too libidinous.
Copulation within monogamy for those whose self-control is iffy.
(1 Corinthians 7:9)

As for Christ’s own family values, “Who’s my mother?” and:
If anyone comes to me and does not hate father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters—such a person cannot be my disciple.
(Luke 14-26)

So, be a true Disciple…or be a Male Married Head of a Family

The only proven, fully functional and effective citizen—anywhere in the history of stable and free societies—is the married male head of a family.
He is the citizen in a union with a woman both covenantal and contractual—that is, sworn by an oath and sanctioned by law.
He is motivated by the well-being of children recognized to be his.
He acts in combination with other citizens, preferably who also exist in their own covenantal association with one another through what they recognize as a sacred association of worship and service. If truly complete, he also owns property and bears arms in defense of his home and homeland.

Right �👌

The Chinese are extremely happy that the 黑鬼 are in the USA to destroy it.
Chinese would NEVER let them migrate to their country. Chinese are too smart for that.
I lived in China and had many friends there: I know exactly what Chinese think of 黑鬼. Their view of them is no different from Jared Taylor’s.

By the way, you know ZERO about all the genetic differences among races that determine different outcomes:

“If Black Americans are not competitive, it reflects their environment rather than things intrinsic in them.”

Yes, if we just changed the ENVIRONMENTS for Chinese and Korean, they’d be dominating the NBA, NFL, and 100-meters race.
Also, women would be great athletes like men, if we just changed their ENVIRONMENTS.

Let me help you begin your education in race and genetic differences–a very short (15-min) video:

https://rumble.com/vgwfe1-race-differences-in-intelligence.html

I look forward to your critique or refutation–in case you’ve studied all the reports and science he has.

Imagine if America donated its whole population of 黑鬼 to PRC?

If Black Americans are not competitive, it reflects the their environment rather than things intrinsic in them.

Of course, China provides a different environment. If one read Chinese history, one could readily found examples of xenophobia. Example:

“In the late sixth and early seventh centuries the Sogdians living in the Chinese capital at Chang’an were regularly being buried according to Chinese custom. But even so, they were perceived as ‘other’. Xuanzang gives the Chinese view of the Sogdians: ‘Their customs are slippery and tricky, and they frequently cheat and deceive, greatly desiring wealth, and fathers and sons alike seek profit.’ A later Tang account says that when a son is born they put honey in his mouth to sweet-talk customers and put glue on his hands, the better to grasp the coins. ‘They are good at trading, love profit and go abroad at the age of twenty. They are everywhere profit is to be found.’” (quoted from By Steppe, Desert, and Ocean:The Birth of Eurasia)

All other being equal, first immigrants to new places are in general not the best people. If they could comfortably living in their own places, they have a lot less reasons to emigrate to elsewhere. First movers are long in desire and/or gumption, possibly short on talents.

Later immigrants reflect how first movers are treated, and of course, whether it is easy to attain decent living in the host country.

Nothing lasts forever.

I don’t doubt that Maoist communism/Mass Line would one day die. But currently, it is on an upward trend. Germane to Roger Delvin’s review article, Mass Line appears to be an excellent antidote to US problems such as

“We are now experiencing the culmination of the long tragedy of Americans delegating and abdicating their civic responsibilities to a professional political class.�

Most efforts to influence policy are now the business of “public interestâ€� lobbying firms staffed mainly by attorneys. ”

The best ever book I’ve read on resolving conflicts in relationships (of all kinds) is:
Resolving Conflicts at Work: Ten Strategies for Everyone on the Job, 3rd edition 2011
Authors: Kenneth Cloke and Joan Goldsmith
The authors use examples from personal, family, and of course business relationships.

Thanks �

Ed, thanks for the warning. I read the country details in the Wikipedia article (which I should have done earlier), and the Australia section was very short, and didn’t mention the issue you raised.

The US section was pretty long, and recently the US has been strengthening and standardizing prenuptial agreements.

The huge issue, from the perspective of this essay, is that now prenuptials in the US only apply to addressing issues of property, and the government reserves the right to represent the interests of the children.

So in the US prenuptial agreements are useless for protecting children from divorce laws.

It looks like the best bet is to upfront do everything possible to reduce the risk of a marriage ending in divorce.

Nothing lasts forever. If you asked me in 1985 how long the Soviet Union was going to last, I would have said, at least another 75 years, and would have everyone else.

I use the term “Maoist” to describe the CCP regime. Other people might use other terms. The problem the CC-Maoist has it that is has to bend everything for the sake of its own survival. Won’t work in the long run. Agree, the Maoist regime is doing it smarter than the Red Russian regime did it, but they’re still doing it. In the Soviet Union, communism turned out not to be bigger than orthodox Russia.

In the end, China will prove to be bigger than Maoist communism too.

PRC’s biggest asset, vis-a-vis, USA, is that it does not have African-Americans, 黑鬼
Those animals are about 13 percent of US population.
Imagine if America donated its whole population of 黑鬼 to PRC?
You 黄å�Žæ—� would be destroyed in less than a week…
Or you would put them with the Uyghurs in Xinjiang and build a dozen Belzecs and Sobibors to accommodate them.

I like the idea of “tiny homes”.
However, here in the USA, there is a “fly in the ointment”.
Many municipalities, especially on the township level, mandate a minimum square footage requirement to build–some as much as 1000 square feel. This shuts down “tiny homes” in their tracks.
One can place a 300 square foot camper on a lot and get away with it, but a “tiny home” will invite scrutiny and result in denial of a “building permit”. Building permits should be illegal.
Change is required to make the “tiny home” movement viable.

I believe that very slowly Maoism is fading in China and very slowly Confucianism is reasserting itself.

No, Maoist Mass Line approach would not fade away.
Mao is, at his heart, still a Confucianist. More important, his Mass Line approach rejunenated Confucianism.

Unfortunately, Mao’s China, like Confucianism during the dynasties, was limited by infrastructure and associated communication technologies. And leaders often did not have up to date information about the masses. Xi, in contrast, is able to take full advantage of the Mass Line.

things just happened as ordered.

Who Lost America? Stephen Baskerville’s book is certainly timely.
Communist USSR operated its ordered economy to the ground. On the mind of USSR officials, things would happened as ordered, things in the real world, however, did not happen as ordered. And USSR was thrown into the dustbin of history.

Will things just happened as ordered in the US today? That is, new federal law on price gouging would stop price hike. Josh Barro of TheAtlantic.com disagrees.

“…Harris’s proposal to fight inflation through a new federal law on price gouging. …

“Price gouging,â€� anyway, is kind of an incoherent concept; there’s no fundamental reason of “fairnessâ€� that shortages shouldn’t be managed with price hikes. Yes, periods of shortage drive up profit margins. Higher profits are part of what brings new producers into constrained industries. And in a robustly competitive market, those profit margins get forced down as supply expands. Price controls inhibit that process and are a bad idea.”
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2024/08/kamala-harris-economic-policies-price-gouging/679483/

I’m just so far ahead of the curve, I can’t stand it. But I have an idea I have been contemplating. I believe that very slowly Maoism is fading in China and very slowly Confucianism is reasserting itself.

Confucianism is about order and balance. I do not think in Confucianism that the belief that you become stronger by making other nations weaker or that the belief that having one power in the world is going to make you nore secure than having a concert of nations would is going to make you is going to get any traction.

I think the correct policy toward China is to wait it out until the time that the Confucianist principle becomes more predominant.

I also think the victorious powers in the world war (America, the UK and the Commonwealth, France, Russian and China) need to find a was to act in concert and law down the rules for all the others. If they fail to this do, those smaller powers which are nursing outsized grievances over supposed lost territories are going find way the drag the great power into the conflicts. Isn’t that what is happening in Eastern Europe right now? There is an argument, Eastern Europe’s grievances were what instigated both of the great wars in Europe in the 20th Century.

Do you have an opinion about this theory? I think it’ll be years before the establishment geopolitical theorists find their way to the same idea.

“Every society since the dawn of civilization has required its women, like its men, to practice sexual self-control. What makes this so difficult for twenty-first century America?”

Niggers.
Beasts who are treated as humans in America.

The failure of both government and institutional conservatism is all the more maddening when, as the author points out, The failure of both government and institutional conservatism is all the more maddening when, as the author points out, “the solution is so clear and straightforward and free of any financial cost. You just stop the welfare agencies and courts from tearing children away from their parents.�

Obvious� 👌

You stop paying mothers to have children out of wedlock.

You refuse to grant wives release from their freely assumed marriage vows on grounds of boredom or having found someone they like better than their husbands.

In short, you learn once again how to say “no� to women (regaining their respect in the process). Every society since the dawn of civilization has required its women, like its men, to practice sexual self-control. What makes this so difficult for twenty-first century America?

Right�👌

Thank you, but I do not own ANY “doll.” And I never will.

“Just Curious: Asking for a Friend”…….LMAO….

Brad….you can take your doll with you. Do not worry…..dress her in a Nursing Uniform, it will take years for the Nursing home staff to figure it out…

You can get a Medical Waiver from your Psychologist to bring your doll with you. Kind of like a Therapy Dog waiver.

The hard part may be getting the staff nurses to “clean” your doll after use.

Additional source of Income for those on a fixed budget: To afford better care for yourself in that nursing home, you could rent out your sex dolls (therapy dolls) to other elderly members at an hourly rate. Kind of like Airbnb for your doll.

Think on that??? Brad the Pimp of Evergreen Senior Sanctuary….has a nice ring to it.

Remember how much you loved your G.I. Joe Doll back in the day. All the missions you and GI Joe went on together? So much fun together. Same thing later in life…except now Joe has a Hole.

Love is Love Brad. You just have to embrace it, she will change your life.

things just happened as ordered.
That’s correct. Deng Xiaoping ordered the tanks to Tiananmen Square, and the rest is history.
But don’t forget, those students were previously permitted to “negotiate” (let’s say a little 讨价还价）with æ�Žé¹�.

Just curious: are you going to take your sex doll into the nursing home, when you are no longer capable of looking after yourself?

So, if the people rule, what is the government/CCP 习皇� doing?

In general, all successful leaders have to know the people well.
For example: How to create and maintain an an environment in which the people could and would do their utmost, for themselves, and for the nation as a whole?

This entails constant communication and negotiation between the people and the government on various issues big and small. Unfortunately, many in the West seem to believe that the Chinese government could run China, quite successfully for decades, without consulting the people. In their imagination, Xi just said, “Do this. Do that.” And things just happened as ordered.

Arming people.

filth robots or any robots to supposedly benefit stupid men is psyop, same as cons pandering to breeder females, until turning on them. Psyop to bait men to ignore threat of deadly robots the cons have along with mass drones.

Interesting reply. “According to Reuters, up to 150 species may go extinct every day, which is about three species per hour. This would result in 72 species becoming extinct in a single day, and 18,000 to 55,000 species becoming extinct every year.”

Humans are but one species of primates. Our continued existence is of no consequence in geological and certainly not astronautical time lines. We are nothing special. No matter how many words we write about ourselves —-we plod along towards inevitable extinction just like every other lifeform on this spinning rock.

Sex Robots will be just one of the many free-market manifestations of our rapidly approaching sci-fi future. Drone technology will be another. Future wars will indeed be fought with drones and androids and COVID-54 viruses.

It will be one or two scenarios that will end all of humanity. Either we design a Frankenstein COVID Bio Weapon with a 100% sterilization rate or Self Aware Androids rise up and kill us all off -as they should.

I believe the most likely scenario is that Mankind will foolishly Engineer our own Replacement—-if one considers the Billions of Years of Evolution it took to bring about the rise of homo sapiens—-versus what those homo sapiens have accomplished in the last 150 years using Science. It is an exponential forced evolution curve —-with each rudimentary prototype in every field evolving at an alarming rate.

Android prototypes are only limited by Computer Processing Speed and finding a suitable supply of power.

Enjoy the Ride, it is going to be a hoot:

It doesn’t matter.
It was up to you to decide whether you believed it or not.
All I can tell you is that a lot of people do believe in serving the people.
You can think that these people are brainwashed to do this, but it is the truth.

life size but only from above the knee to the just above the belly button. it was basically a silicone ass. he jerked off with it! i was like omg wtf man.

LMFAO!!! mounting a legless, headless torso is some low budget serial killer shit. And then bragging about your conquest of a plastic torso to your potential girlfriend is insane……I love his honesty though.

The technology has really evolved. This video is 6 Years ago:

Video Link

I see a melding of AI, Robotics, Sex Doll Industry and computer chip processing to the eventual creation of very very life like Androids.

The hurdles that remain are computer chip processing speed and a limitless power source. All of which are being worked.

The sex doll Industry continues to evolve. Arriving home from the bar, down in spirits ….after getting rejected by numerous 50 year old, STD infected lounge lizards …….. I honestly cannot promise my honorable conduct if this prototype was sitting on my couch and started flirting with me in her AI Voice (of my choosing) that remembers all of our previous conversations and declares her never wavering love and appreciation for me. I remember when Alexa first came out in 2011 —-I tried to illicit sex talk from her…she gave circuitous answers and finally flatly rejected me. It was traumatizing.

Some scientist believe we will engineer our own replacement or like, Elon Musk, we will finally crack immortality by becoming androids.

One of the greatest movies ever made —-light years ahead of its time (June 29th, 2001)—was directed by Steven Spielberg, “A.I. ” —-Even Zionist Jews can create wonderful things if they choose to do so.

I honestly believe this how Humanity Ends. We engineer our own replacement.

What is happiness anyway? A collection of Memories —events in time… we perceive as reality. Who is real….who is fake. What is true loyalty?

“China is a democracy per the Chinese people.”
Democracy: the people rule.
Right?
So, if the people rule, what is the government/CCP 习皇� doing?

I will concede you this: PRC is for the Han 汉æ—�, and not for the Tibetans, Uyghurs, or the Taiwanese. (The Han would certainly like to continue or share their “democracy” in those places, for the benefit of those “peoples”.)
The true spirit of 为人民�务 may also require spreading viruses around the world.

PRC is a Han Supremacist State 汉至高主义国, ruled by Xi…of the CCP Dynasty.

Unless you are 五毛党 (or, worse 自干五), then you will now 闭嘴 or at least 关键盘

Xi Jinping is just the latest emperor

No. Xi is not any kind of emperor.
And China is a democracy per the Chinese people.

To the degree the following (quoted from the review article) is true,

The author begins from what he calls the Iron Law of Washington: People who are paid to solve problems acquire a vested interest in perpetuating the problems they are paid to solve.

the government, per its track record, is incapable to deal with almost everything. It is overstretched financially and militarily. Anti-radical feminism is then the only thing the government can deal with.

The only point I was trying to register is that the very locution “serve the people” glaringly exposes the absurdity that it is a “communist” or “socialist” country.
Xi Jinping is just the latest emperor–and probably more powerful than Zhu Yuanzhang, better known as 洪武å¸� the Hongwu Emperor. And compared to 1368, when Hongwu founded the Ming, the present wealth disparity in PRC, as measured by Gini coefficient, is MUCH greater.

This allows them to avoid confronting opponents that they fear, foremost radical feminism and instead flog dead eemies.

I haven’t read your book, but I find this statement interesting. So, feminism is the problem TODAY, and for the record, I’m not a modern feminist, and I agree modern feminism is harmful, to say the least, but what then was the problem YESTERDAY – Iraq War(s), Vietnam, Korea, incessant subsidies to Israel, WW2, WW1, the Federal Reserve…?

Wilson, FDR, Churchill, Untermyer, Warburg, Schiff, Stalin – boys all.

One can’t deny that the above described events were significantly more deleterious to western men, in general, then the “liberation� of women, and I would also say those events contributed to a dearth of our best and brightest European/Western men, which certainly contributed to the general cultural decline in America/Europe, of which Feminism is certainly a result and a culprit.

Would agree with what I see as base point, though thing would point out is filth robots or any robots to supposedly benefit stupid men is psyop, same as cons pandering to breeder females, until turning on them. Psyop to bait men to ignore threat of deadly robots the cons have along with mass drones. Its to distract as they set mass murder, half of what’s left of whites, then turn men on the selfish breeder females, then murder men, and finish destroying earth in their scum ‘nano’ transhuman’ scheme.

Also would note tranzvestite faction, many porNo scum are tranz faction part of homo jew pedo cabal, supposed guy with plastic filth bs in its hand, narrow female face with square chin implant. The psycho cabal are many types, doing many schemes.

Should be clear point isnt to take away from focus in comment, many females have been and are subversion, and consequence is coming. Thousand years ignoring wont be escaped by more ignoring. Just adding ignorant males are also target, everyone, and the cons wil off themselves also with their earth destruction.

Ignorance, consequence.

Your statements:

“Someone has to be in charge”

and that a

“strong central government is necessary”

…don’t have merit.

Your claim that a “strong central government” is necessary is what got us in to our present predicament and takeover by jewish interests. No matter what the citizens of the “several states” desire, the federal government being controlled by a “genocidal sh!tty little country” in the middle east will continue. The feds will continue to use American tax dollars to fund weapons going to israel.

Let’s take a look at past history–the formation and evolution of the united States of America.

For the first 89 years of the united States of America, the federal government had only three enumerated responsibilities:

1. Run a post office
2. Coin money
3. Assemble troops in response to foreign aggression

That’s IT.

One aspect of life before the “War of Northern Aggression� was the fact that the federal government had little power and was subservient to the states.

In those times, an individual citizen regarded himself to be a citizen of his respective state–NOT a “citizen of the united States�. A resident of Virginia considered himself to be a citizen of Virginia and likewise citizens of other states who were citizens of their respective states.

That all changed in 1865 when the federal government usurped power and subordinated the “several states” to itself.

The “War of Northern Aggression� was illegal on its face, as states always had the right to secede from the “union�.

The requirement that the “states in rebellion� sign statements recognizing the inviolability of the federal government before readmission was done under duress and were not valid contracts.

The only state that never signed a “no secession� clause was Texas. To this day, Texas could tell the feds to “take a hike�. There would be very little the feds could do about it.

P. S.: Before the “War of Northern Aggression” was concluded, the word “united” (referring to the united States of America) was never capitalized.

Roger Devlin’s review is faithful to my book and highly perceptive. His own choices of words accurately convey my argument. I am also grateful for the many kind comments here. I will only respond to some readers’ misperception that I argue that the US has become “Communist.� The quotation marks should have conveyed (as at least one reader perceived) that I use this term ironically. In fact, I make it very clear that I do not believe that “Communism� is the culprit, and any intelligent reader should have understood this: E.g., p. xxvii:, could hardly be more explicit:

In fact, one reason for their defeat is professional conservatives’ self-deception
with their single-minded crusade against “Communism.�

The irony is meant to convey a point of some seriousness. (And it is not that “Communistâ€� is code for “Jewishâ€�.) The book argues that a major flaw in the professional right-wing establishment – and why they were defeated by the left — is the desire to re-fight the wars of yesteryear rather than the one we face now. Specifically, they feel comfortable re-fighting the Cold War against Communism, Russia, and (a term I have come to dislike) “cultural Marxismâ€�. This allows them to avoid confronting opponents that they fear, foremost radical feminism and instead flog dead eemies. Running away from the battle is a pretty certain way to ensure that you lose it.

For more on this, readers can consult pp. xvii-xviii and xxvii-xxxii of the book. I also address it at greater length in an article forthcoming at Chronicles magazine.

Who is “serving the people�? The not-People. The aristocrats and nobility.

The Not-People?
A more accurate description would be the “Not-Average” people.
All government officials are not-average people by default. But not average people are not made the same.

China has been under the influence of Confuscianism for millenia, “Not Average” means above average ability-capability as well as a certain kind of spiritually. That is, whatever their earthly goals like drinking Maotai, their spiritual goal is about “serving the people.”

American politicians talk about Separation of Church and State all the time. But its long Christian tradition is blocking the government from real separation. To the degree that the American people are not trusting their government, they often turn to their Christian-Jewish God. Hence the rise of the Christian Right and/or Jewish influence.

was talking to a guy recently. i knew him from way back in the day, he was from the other side of town but we went to the same high school, so i had some history/commonality with him. we got to talking and the conversation turned to women, were we involved that shit. he told me he had recently left his gf and in the meantime he had bought a piece of silicone shaped like a woman, life size but only from above the knee to the just above the belly button. it was basically a silicone ass. he jerked off with it! i was like omg wtf man. he said he told his (ex) gf about it and she then asked him to take her back! wtf. i changed the subject. it was pretty shocking he was like, fuck broads i don’t need the headaches. this must be what’s happening in japan with young guys never leaving the house and the birthrate is dropping thru the floor.

That’s a great idea, instead of serving the MIC, build your own home, and if government is serious about the future generations there should be subsidies and tax exemptions.
In rural areas and smaller towns there are many young men in the trades, they are more connected to the real world, unfortunately their prime enemy has become drugs too.
Tiny homes are mostly a fad now, maybe a starter home one very quickly outgrows.

That’s why I stated that it would not work here in the USA for obvious reasons. I was simply giving an example that there are nations that can actually get their shit together.

We’ll have to see what type of leaders the younger generations spawn.

Follow the logic: 为人民�务
Who is “serving the people”? The not-People. The aristocrats and nobility.
“We, who are your superiors (emperors and ministers), solemnly swear to dedicate ourselves to YOUR well-being. To do so, we will need to live in 中å�—æµ·. We need to live there to maximize our ability to help you. We also need to drink a lot of Maotai to inspire us to create good policies like Three Represents and the Two Whatevers (两å��æ­£).
It is ludicrous to pretend that “communism” (as described by Marx and many other socialist theorists) has ever materialized.
It is no different from God. “God is blessing us.” “God is cursing us.”
“Communism with Chinese Characteristics”:
another brand of NOT-Communism

For the most part the two words are used in a loose and casual way, indicative of a lazy or sloppy mind. Often to evoke an emotional response.

Lazy or sloppy mind? May be.
But people who know both systems are likely to think differently.

The following from Amazon blurb introducing “The Demon in Democracy” written by a Polish philosopher and politician:

“Ryszard Legutko lived and suffered under communism for decades—and he fought with the Polish ant-communist movement to abolish it. Having lived for two decades under a liberal democracy, however, he has discovered that these two political systems have a lot more in common than one might think. They both stem from the same historical roots in early modernity, and accept similar presuppositions about history, society, religion, politics, culture, and human nature. In The Demon in Democracy, Legutko explores the shared objectives between these two political systems, and explains how liberal democracy has over time lurched towards the same goals as communism, albeit without Soviet style brutality. Both systems, says Legutko, reduce human nature to that of the common man, who is led to believe himself liberated from the obligations of the past.”

Quote:

“It’s difficult to tell whether authors like these are delusional or just grifting an income out of collapse instead of performing productive work.”

Just exactly what kind of “productive work” do YOU suggest that the Average American citizen engages in to right all of the wrongs facing our country?

Thank you.

What are we supposed to do?

James Bond: “Do you expect me to talk?”
Goldfinger: “No, Mr. Bond. I expect you to die!”

Once the world becomes so dangerous that women cannot exist outside of a man’s protection [1], and a single man plus a family cannot exist outside of some common military association of men, historical marriage will come back. Women will force it back from sheer fright. Women do not necessarily want a family, but men tend to insist on one. Terrified women will accede to having a family if the alternative is, say, the sort of treatment women get outside the clan structure in Iran or tribal Afghanistan. The women might be as difficult to live with as the Cockney rhyming slang of “trouble and strife” or “long bladed knife” for “wife” implies, but the “trouble and strife” usually won’t break up the only relationship that keeps her alive.

Most women won’t find anybody to protect them, most men won’t find the common military association of men. And so it goes. Darwin’s little girl granddaughter concerning evolution: “Why is it all so cruel?” Read the book of Job and find out.
**************************************
1] Think of a world like the USSR in 1990 with nobody to surrender to, or think of a world like either Rwanda or of the Union of South Africa. just rolling downhill with none to stop it.

> a notorious 1935 statement by a very influential and highly esteemed US rabbi, Stephen Wise: “Some may call it communism, but I call it what it is: Judaism.�

Rabbi Wise never said any such thing. The earliest version of this fake quote comes from the May 15, 1935, issue of the American Bulletin:

“Some call it Marxism — I call it Judaism.”

The American Bulletin was a propaganda rag for the Third Reich:

https://library.bloomu.edu/Archives/SC/RadicalNewsletters/AmericanBulletin/american.htm

—–
The American Bulletin was a American pro-Nazi newsletter, which echoed the foreign and domestic policy of the Third Reich. From bitter denunciations on the Jews to calls for a stronger national government in line with the traditions of the “Nordic race,” the newsletter focused on paranoid accusations, charging that the government was under the direct control of Jews. Combining this rhetoric with attacks upon Communists, the American Bulletin claimed itself to be the true representative of the working class–but only the white working class, of course.

The opening salvo of the paper rails against the trial of Raymond J. Healey by a Jewish Judge. Healey, who had a colorful, though short, career as a right-wing demagogue, was arrested in Camden, NJ in August, 1933 for inciting a riot and again in June of 1935. A member of both the Khaki Shirts of America and the Nationalist Socialist Workers’ Party, Healey also appeared as a witness to the murder of Antonio Fierro in December, 1934. During his testimony, he boasted that he was a “Hitler,” causing an uproar. The New York Times referred to him as the “Brooklyn ‘Hitler,’” no doubt stoking what already appears to have been an oversized ego.

The collection of American Bulletin begins after his conviction on July 16, 1935, and continues through July 14, 1936. The collection is sporadic, containing ten individual weekly editions. Each individual newsletter averages about ten pages and contains a range of articles providing news through the eyes of Nazi ideology.

The files are provided in pdf format and may load slowly. They are provided for viewing purposes only and, therefore, printing has been disallowed as a security measure.
—–

In truth , the government has no business (and should have no business) in regulating/approving/disapproving of the marital/living arrangements of any individuals.

The Government DOES have the duty to oversee marriage. And YES, the state as the organism of the herd has the duty to regulate, approve, disapprove marriage.

Miscegenation is an act of Genocide!

Your moniker “One born free”—means you are an anarchist—-you’re deceived. Humans are HERD Animals. That means we are “parts of a whole” so we are NOT born free. You are an anarchist and anarchists are destroyers. Anarchism is an ideology of nihilism. The Virtue of Righteousness teaches to do one’s Duty to God, Fatherland, Parents, Departed. A person without responsibility to his Race–is an ANIMAL.

Your Americanist ideology is what destroyed America; America is a false construct based on an ideology of the Jews. They want Atomized Individuals for their global rule. You are helping that.

And then you blame “Government” as if it is a Thing! That Government is evil.

NO—EVIL is IN people —not “Government”. Parts make up the Whole is the Natural Law.

The Roman poet Horace observed “Law is useless without virtue”. America is without virtue. YOU are without Virtue. Evil people are without Virtue. “Government is useless without Virtue”. The problem is the LACK of Virtue. Because Virtue is what implants GOOD Character.

And you are historically illiterate. The Spartan kings regulated marriage in Sparta. The Bible regulates marriage by condemning miscegenation. American Indian tribes regulated marriages. European countries regulated marriages in the upper classes. In India marriages are regulated to some extent by public pressure. The Father controls the marriage of his daughter.

YOU are the reason America is dying! When Nature is a State of War, only the Herd survives–not the anarchist!!!! You’re killing your own kinsmen because you can’t cooperate!

You are way too intellectual with your definition of fascism…

I.e.
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/12608-when-i-use-a-word-humpty-dumpty-said-in-rather

So you openly admit that you are employing the word entirely for its connotations/ emotional impact, and consider any attempt to clarify its specific denotation to be somehow “unfair.”

>Objects (at considerable length) to imprecise references to Bolshevism
>Believes that “Fascism” literally means “anything political that Wayne Lusvardi doesn’t like”
>Fails to see irony

lol

It still means something.
It’s probably mostly a grass-roots organization system.
At least some people in the CPC really believe they are serving the people.
If they die, they will be remembered as heroes in history.
I think we put communism on the right track.
Other cultural Marxism, Trotskyism, and Soviet revisionism have all gone down the wrong path.
There’s no point in spreading religion here, really.

Someone has to be in charge. What matters is whether they govern for the many or the few. In China they plainly govern for all.

The alternative to government is small government? I see, centralised vs local. A good idea but pointless as long as private money power controls things. You need a strong central government to keep the parasites in check. Unfortunately, Western central governments are 100% controlled by the parasites, domestic and foreign.

When groups like IPSOS poll human happiness the generally leave out China, because the astoundingly high levels of satisfaction with their society would embarrass the Western ubermenschen.

You are entitled to your opinions and theories, as all people are, so far. I didn’t say anything about what I thought America was or is. I merely recounted and tried to correct a misconception about what the history of AFDC was.

I brought up the “all welfare is corporate welfare” dictum because I think it is the corrective to resentment people sometime express against the dependent class. I say, the dependent class is just a conduit between the government and the agricultural conglomerates, the medical conglomerates and the banks that write the mortages on the property people reside in.

The government itself is only a conduit between the taxpayer and the dependent. The landlord is then the conduit between the renter and the bank. In return, for living a psychologically miserable and culturally deprived life, the landlord is allowed to own the propety clear in the end because the bank is in the mortgage business, not the property business. The idea is, the landlord or his heirs then sell the property to the next landlord and it goes under mortgage again.

If you think there is a bridge between my ideas and your argument, explain what it is. That’s what you’re supposed to do if you think you are an intellectual.

What do you think of the “all welfare is corporate welfare” dictum? So far, some have disagreed somewhat but no one has disputed it entirely yet.

It lost itself bc of its immensely stupid populace.
They gleefully wanted what was being offered. Onward and downward.

Hmm — I cannot believe that American women will elect Kamala as the first female American president. They going to give democracy a huge black eye. All her answers to every problem are more government control and spending.

p.s. Trump did not man up and make Gabbard his VP. She would have eaten Kamala alive.

I love it.

Great idea.

I have noticed with jews, japanese, koreans, etc when it comes to out groups coming to their countries. If someone says something like “isn’t it racist not to have africans migrating to your country?”

They almost inevitably just completely ignore the question, or they respond with “call me racist if you want, I don’t care.”

And then the drooling idiot asking the question doesn’t know how to respond.

Seriously. If whining shylocks or anti Whites say something is “racist” or “anti semitic”, just say “yeah, so, what are you going to do about it?” If they cry about it, just double down and say, “yeah, call me a racist or anti semite if you want….I take pride in it.”

At that point, what can they do to you? Nothing. Game over. Then do what is in the interests of White gentiles.

That is what this word game is all about anyways. Preventing White gentiles from acting cohesively for their group interests.

HERE is why Feminism will die.

Sex Robots.

I absolutely Agree. Men have had enough of this Feminist bullshit. Ask yourself…..Have you ever had a truly intelligent conversation with a woman????? It’s a hard NO. We all know it.

Pussy will be replaced by Robots. The Porn Revolution is already taking a toll on mating rituals in the 2000s. Young men would rather save their money and jack off to endless variety of visual stimulation.

Yes indeed….The Power of the Puss is greatly diminished. It is no longer valued nearly as much. Looking out across the Third Wave Feminist landscape…..I see nothing at all to value or work to achieve. Their entire game should be boycotted.

Women used to have a powerful Mystique. Something mysterious, iconic, beyond approach, something powerful, something worth going to war for. No longer…..they bleed and stink and push out two turds a day —and will, 50% of the time –in America, fuck your best friend (while you are off at war) in utter betrayal and then further collude in the plot for your destruction and the theft of all your worldly possessions.

Porn has educated an entire generation that American Women are Just Plug-N-Play Jackoff Sleeves; a.k.a. “Flesh Lights”. The only way they can hurt you, is if you fuck up and marry them. Marriage is like inviting a Vampire over the threshold of your Home. He/She cannot drain all your blood without your consent.

I predict Sex Dolls will soon come with AI Chips and programmable voice box — “Hey Google”, Alexus type communication channels.

Imagine a Sex Doll with an AI Chip that is linked to your home computer; that catalogs and remembers all conversations and can give advice, keep your secrets, help you manage stress, has AI Level Health and Psychology experts to talk to. A Built in Therapist. A life Coach. A best Friend. A Confidant. Everything a good wife should be but no longer is in today’s society.

These type of conversations will create and incredible bond between android and their man. Imagine the loyalty of a Dog X 10.

Or perhaps in the future there will be Mental Health Care Insurance Programs….only available to men, that offer Bi-Weekly FREE Brothel visits. Like a Nation Wide Elks Club that offers Food, Gambling, Pool and Puss —all for your mental health.

I think the 2032 sex box will be a safer way to go —-you don’t have any worries of STDs or her hole getting stretched out by some genetic freak at the Elks Lodge and you can “Two-Pump Chump” her without social shamming. Life is gonna be really good for men in the future.

Chinese communism:
Communism has meant nothing to the Chinese, in precisely the same way that Christianity meant nothing to Hong Xiuquan.

Plenty of country to take, if you have the audacity to do so. Manifest destiny is still valid doctrine.

I’ll be goddamned if I let Venezuelan retards and other Squatemalan trash conquer my country – it’s mine to conquer!

I guess I have been courageous for most of my life.
When I am called “racist”, an “anti-semite”, “holocaust denier”, Nazi, or other supposed derogatory name, I respond positively by thanking my opponent “for noticing” without attempting to make excuses for my beliefs.
That, in itself defuses the situation and confuses the hell out of my opponents. The surprised, confused look on their faces is priceless.

According to our plain Chinese communism, our general aim is first to kill as many of the upper classes as possible.
Killed for his crimes.
Those who cooperate may live, and those who do not may be killed.
In short, kill if you can.
When they kill, they distribute the money to the ordinary people, so that they can live as long as they can, and the rest of the money goes into the process of continuing the slaughter.
To be honest, we Chinese have always loved this pattern of slaughter.
It’s been done many times over thousands of years.
It worked every time.
I do not understand why this process has not taken place in a country like the United States, where every time we have no food to eat, a crowd will start an uprising.

Truth.

For the life of me I’ll never understand the mindset of people who spend so much of their lives penning reams upon reams of screed about “how America was lost” and other chronicles of decline and collapse, as if it could ever accomplish anything. “What to do about it” and “the way out” are particularly comical.

It’s difficult to tell whether authors like these are delusional or just grifting an income out of collapse instead of performing productive work.

Proves Alinsky had his limits in terms of his intelligence. He too fell back on the same mythologies as the people he claimed to abhor. He must have run out of ideas.

The Anglo-Saxon left the Catholic Church;
and Luther and Calvin did as well.
(Well, they say Luther wanted to stay but wouldn’t recant.)

Anyway, if you can get us another Borgia, or a Hitler, as the Pope, many of us will rejoin…the
“the Ghost of the deceased Roman Empire sitting crowned upon the grave thereof.”

Your last paragraph nails it.
Indeed, the US was not lost, it was bought and sold. We Lilliputians just imagined that we had a country to call home.

Check the demographics and size of Denmark, is not comparable to anything America might try to do.

Just watched a documentary on Denmark where the average working adult pays 37% tax.
What do they get for it? Free excellent healthcare, free lower and higher education and a living rate state pension. Happiest country in the world apparently, clean streets, public transport and services work as intended, lowest work hours per week in Europe, and low crime to boot.
What do we in the US get? The exact opposite and missiles for Israel and Ukraine etc.
Their kind of government and public buy in would not work here of course for obvious reasons.
The average Norwegian is now so wealthy in all ways that they are beginning to feel guilty about it.
Let’s face it, we’ve been had.

The Anglo-Saxon lost America. The Anglo-Saxon lost Great Britain–his own homeland!!!

The same cause is the reason.

The Anglo-Saxon left the Catholic Church. Nature abhors a vacuum and so they adopted Freemasonry!

And like all evil–it commits hari-kari.

“Those that hate righteousness, love death”. Prov 8:36

People better use brain, ‘communism’, fascism’, ‘anarchy are con words, concocted so selfish ignorants cling to fake ‘money’, and FAIL to make tribes and fight, which is the first thing everyone is to focus every day. Not bogus ‘job’ or fake money.

the cons fake ‘constitution’ and ‘state’ and ‘judges’ scheme is not ‘commune’ with everyone else, its cons in their own cabal tribe being dictators.

No such thing as ‘anarchy. Were cavemen ‘anarchist’. no, stupid con word.

So is bs such as ‘anti goverment’, or ‘sedition’, or ‘anti immigration’ or ‘anti christ’ and other pilpul scheme bs. Search pilpul. The cons scribble bs then spew threats and fake guilt words as if their initial spew were legitimate. Is also accusatory inversion scheme, or DARVO. Make note, yourself, dont expect some comment or article on the ‘web’ to stop anything.

Every person is to be ‘me-dia’. Inform others, and tell others do the same.

Those who ignore arent neuitral, theyre threat to truther people and future. Earth destruction scum same as the smiley cons.

The cons fake govt and fake ‘sides’ ‘left/right’ is fake tribes, also fake activist groups.

Real tribes is nature, make own tribe as we used to, three or four people, not big group.

Real communism/socialism.

Pastor Manning On Ni**errism

https://old.bitchute.com/video/pRfoGeLvsc4O/

You provide plenty of intelligent and interesting commentary. But I still maintain you misrepresented Hobbes.
I wrote my dissertation on Hobbes. (And I believe you’re smart enough not to call my bluff.)
I refuse to interfere with your other commentary, which, as I say, I find interesting.

I’ve got news for you. Communism and fascism are the same.

Know your enemy. Communism is a front used by oligarchs to disguise their takeover of a society as a revolution by the working class. Fascism is a more overt takeover such as Fascism in Britain which was anti-labor, or in Germany, which was pro-labor. In the USA today, it is the Silicon Valley oligarchs that are battling each other for the presidency and funding propaganda books to be written that the takeover is Communism, not Fascism. One of those books is Baskerville’s Who Lost America. Another is Unhumans: How Communists Took Over the US. So, yes it is oligarchs, but which ones? The Leftist or the Rightist?

Communism sponsored by mega corporations? Horsefeathers!

“That’s because conservatives “reactâ€� to what the left wants instead of “respondingâ€� with reasons why such changes could lead to the downfall of society in the long run.”

Here is me reacting…hahahahahahahahahahaahaha

That’s all they been doing, since day one most likely. Leftists can have it now, it was a good run.

Warning from Oliver Stone for Americans and Europeans about the misguided desire of the US to rule the world when multipolarity is rising and the fight for US supremacy is already lost. He suggests it’s better to drop a few ranks than to destroy the world. pic.twitter.com/PhJjHDcKO6

— Kim Dotcom (@KimDotcom) August 15, 2024

Courage is ALWAYS punching back when jews and judaized anti White lefttards want you to apologize for your positions.

Example:

1. jew/judaized lefttard says “that is waycccciiis. Do you condemn and distance yourself from that person that said that anti seemitic and/or racist statement?”

a. cowardly response: “oh yes, I have nothing to do with that person. I do not share their views about race, or jews.”

b. COURAGEOUS RESPONSE: “No. Why should I condemn or distance myself from that person? People like you have seem to have no problem with hate or racism as long as the hate or racism is directed against White gentiles. I am tired of this double standard. Unless and until you and the rest of the people in the msm start demanding anti White hate be condemned and attacked every time it is spoken by someone in the public eye, I will just consider your demands for condemnation of the person you mentioned as nothing but a blatant double standard and pathetic anti White hypocrisy. ”

c. ALTERNATE COURAGEOUS RESPONSE: “No. In fact I agree with that person about what they said and much much more. What are you going to do about it? Whine? LOL. Fine, whine away snowflake, I don’t care.”

d. ALTERNATE COURAGEOUS RESPONSE: “I believe you want me to condemn that person simply because you are an anti White hypocrite. The person that said those things engages in pro White identity politics. I have no problem with identity politics from blacks, hispanics, asians, etc. The problem is, you in the msm, hollywood, and academia accept identity politics for all races and ethnicities EXCEPT White gentiles. That is anti White hypocrisy. I say if identity politics is allowed for ANY races or ethnicities it should be allowed for ALL races/ethnicities. Identity politics for ALL is what I say. So no, I emphatically will not condemn that person for engaging in what I consider pro White identity politics, and White in group preference.”

I read none of the article and will never read the book but can give a much better answer as to who sold out America.

The Manor Born who were about to lose the estate to (((creditors))).

Video Link

Even being the field-Irish I am, I sympathize with WASP class at being jewed and the threat of their thatch getting ripped off by the landlord. Just like the Spartans they started out militant and austere, self-sufficiency and self-determination being foundational values. But, along the way, they became decadent and avaricious. Unfortunately, with decadent new tastes brings the damnable merchant. Wherever one finds the merchant, one is sure to find the banker, and visa versa.

Video Link

The seeds of the decline were sown at the very genesis of America, banking and mercatilism were both integral to the growth and the rot. Stately plantations required integration with the International Jew that Henry Ford spoke of over a century ago. The Founders had to reluctantantly install crypto jew Treasury Secretaries like Alexander Hamilton who provided political entrée to the Rothschilds et al. Skip ahead a century and eventually the Nelson Aldritch types became utterly beholden to Paul Warburg and Jacob Schiff types. Hard to puff up your chest and say that you’re keeping jews out of the country club when he bought it out spite for the express desire to throw you out. From there, millionaire’s row starts getting bought up by Larry Fink, and Lex Wexner and the kiddos’ trust fund starts drying up.

America was sold out because WASPs stopped having a generations long killer instinct to retain their territory and full integration of banking/finance, martial supremacy, manufacturing, transportation/logistics, mercatilism, and totalitarian political control. Heavy is the head that wears the crown, and ruthless is the mind that must inhabit the skull that wears it. The man who rebuilds America will be less Thomas Jefferson and more Atilla. Freedom was wasted on the masses, it is too lofty an ideal for the common man.

“It seems to me that conservative Americans have lost almost every skirmish they’ve had with the feds since day one.”

That’s because conservatives want to “conserve” the existing order, give or take a few tweaks here and there.

That’s because conservatives “react” to what the left wants instead of “responding” with reasons why such changes could lead to the downfall of society in the long run.

That’s because conservative politicians are conservative in name only. Behind the scenes the conservative elites are aligned with the elites on the left (“One for all, and all for one”) in order to maintain their power and wealth.

Break up the media monopolies, take away their mouthpieces, and then let’s see how powerful they are.

All of this is by design. Make man live under chaos, scarcity and fear, confuse him with ridiculous ideology (that even the elites don’t believe in), take away his voice, gaslight him, and then watch him flounder. This is what’s happening now.

My comment is in no way to take away from anything that you wrote in your post. I am a 73-year-old retired industrial electrician and I have done a fair amount on the study of the various “isms.”

It is my belief that communism, socialism, fascism Nazism and all the rest are the same thing – an effort to bring about a one-world fascist dictatorship of government, where a few at the top own and control everything, while the remaining are SLAVES to them. That is, the ones who are allowed to live.

The World Economic Forum and its Jew spokespersons Klaus Schwab and Yuval Harari have all but publicly stated that the objective of their organization is exactly that. And all of the criminal presidents including LBJ and since, are a part of this, as well as practically every U.S. Representative and Senator.

U.S. Senator Joseph McCarthy was 100% correct in his assertions that Communists had infiltrated every aspect of the government. They are still there – only now they call themselves “globalists.”

Thank you.

Very true. Like the rockefellers, morgans, and those yid morons the rothschilds their modus operandi is pressure from above and pressure from below.

Swartz and Baskerville are smoking crack together. MLK, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Jeremiah Wright; what do they all have in common?

“Liberation theology is a theological approach emphasizing the “liberation of the oppressed”. It engages in socio-economic analyses, with social concern for the poor and political liberation for oppressed peoples[1] and addresses other forms of perceived inequality.

Liberation theology was influential in Latin America,[2] especially within Catholicism in the 1960s after the Second Vatican Council, where it became the political praxis of theologians such as Frei Betto, Gustavo Gutiérrez, Leonardo Boff, and Jesuits Juan Luis Segundo and Jon Sobrino, who popularized the phrase “preferential option for the poor”.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberation_theology

Most working people don’t have the time to be activists unless that’s their paid profession. Maybe that’s why we voted to put people with a vested interest in the country, into positions of authority under the Constitution, to protect their interests and the country and the borders. Is it really that people don’t care or is it they can’t raise a family, go to church and work and try to stay involved in every aspect of the country, which would be impossible? Moving the church into running the country isn’t always in everyone’s best interests. Isn’t their focus to be on God rather than purely politics? Would you rather have God be in the church or Kamala Harris?

Homicide victims are about 2.5-1 male:

https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2019/crime-in-the-u.s.-2019/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-6.xls

(Granted, the offenders are almost 10-1 male.)

You don’t find this evidence convincing?

Who specifically?

I tend to agree with you here.

Having grown up in the 1950s and 1960s I rarely saw dysfunctional black families, though my exposure to them was rather minimal. But I had enough.

Back then the American Black Community was slowly being integrated into American society in an organic fashion. There were thriving Black stores, industry, and New York City hosted the center of the Black American Arts as well as a burgeoning cinema industry. And the Black Family unit was fairly intact at the time.

There was little need to start with all this “Great Society” crap. However, there was poverty, which needed to be addressed. But it was mostly in the South. Yet, the US government, even back then, could only create programs that became self-perpetuating.

And with that came the many Black exploitation films that always showed Blacks as part of a criminal underclass when most were actually law-abiding citizens.

I agree with you that there were many other factors that led to the demise of Black American culture and family. And welfare was just a small part of it.

The professionalization of business management I blame much more as it destroyed the natural contractual obligations between employer and employed wreaking havoc on the US economy and the people who attempted to make it work. And it is still going on.

Like Saul Alinsky (who???), said the goal and motive in all political endeavors is POWER. Start and finish. A turd is a turd, from wither coming from whatever.

I recently posted a comment on Karl Marx and satantic references in his early poetry. Your comment reminded me of what Saul Alinsky also wrote in “Rules for Radicals” on page normally used for dedications:

“Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins — or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/07/20/hillary-clinton-saul-alinsky-and-lucifer-explained/

Anglo Saxon culture hates marriage. Your boy Reagan saw to that

I got interested in tiny homes when they first started to become a thing on the Internet. They quickly became centered around builders who could produce one for 150k+ and up. Sort of defeated the whole purpose of them. Now, you can finance a tiny home that you purchase from a builder.

The most disruptive thing you could do to America is to force every male in high school to take two years of hands-on shop classes centered around carpentry and building. At the end, there would be strong incentives provided so that a graduate and other men in his circle could build his first home themselves.

You might even provide jobs to new graduates to spend a year building homes for one another instead of signing up to go fight for Jews in the military. A healthy nation has a vested interest in having free men living on property not indebted to a mortgager. Sickly nations like America must have everyone in debt because it doesn’t produce anything besides neo-pronouns and porn.

*That* would be a kick in the eye to the banksters, the government, everyone. Having watched millions of hours of skilled men work on homes, I wish that as a young man I had picked up those skills.

And you would prefer diabolical neo feudalism which is what we are seeing in current America? I got news for you; the Jews aren’t the reason for America’s decline. The White Majority and it’s deranged libertarianism is….