You have nailed it. Putin was obsequious and grovelled to the official US narrative about the 9/11 attacks. He tried to ingratiate himself into the global war on terror. The snakes who contrived that attack have now turned their fangs against him. I have no pity for him whatsoever.

Again, this memo was non-binding.

I forgot to mention that kikes are fraudsters, terrorists, murderers, child-traffickers, sodomites, pimps, organ-traffickers, drug-dealers, transsexuals, perverts, saboteurs, traitors, liars, baby-killers and genocidaires, and they committed slow-rolling suicide, starting on October 8th, 2023; at the risk of a lowbrow pop culture reference, as the darkie said in Gladiator, “he must kill your name before he kills you.” But the kikes have done it to themselves. I’m all stocked up on popcorn.

“Scott Ritter made a similar argument in Russian News. He wrote a long rant about how Russia won’t invade Ukraine and it’s all the imagination of the CIA.”

Who gives a shit? Ritter’s a retard.

“It’s obvious why John Johnson wants American domination, since he is a Jew (as revealed by his histrionic reaction to that Jewish rave slut being “rapedâ€� and killed),”

Lol, it’s obvious from his loyalties, his shitty posting style, his shitty takes, his shitty attitude, and the large amount of time he has to do Hasbara on the clock (maybe he’s getting chatgpt to write that scheisse, so caveat emptor on the time thing). I sussed him out in like 1m flat from like two paragraphs in this thread.

Kikes can’t hide their stink. It’s too easy anymore: nobody who isn’t a kike or in their pay supports Weimerica’s vileness. Fucking zoomer normies know the kikes have to go. (Hey kike, explain to us how I knew you were a kike after reading you for 30 seconds. I mean, you’d think being a stark raving antisemite would impair my faculties, but it seems to have sharpened them in this case – how does that feel, knowing I smelled the stink on you from – presumably – hundreds or thousands of miles away?)

“Russians commonly view the Baltics and Poland as deserving to be ruled by Moscow [lie, citation needed]. Putin is on record stating that the USSR should not have fallen and that it was an extension of the Russian empire [so what? Tendentious irrelevant bullshit].

They view the Baltics as lost territories [They ARE lost territories, smooth-brain]. The Poles are viewed as a subclass of people. It’s very similar to the 1930s German view of Poland. Basically not a real state since they have had so many rulers.”

Lol, yes, you kikes’ view of the Russians is very similar to the traditional kike view of Germans, and all goyim among whom your slithering tribe can “pass” (Europeans and Southwest Asians); you have to enslave us.

“If not for NATO they would absolutely try to take them back [lie, unfalsifiable]. When Putin was in the KGB he was adamantly against letting GDR leave [irrelevant].”

Your (phony) insistence on rigor and evidence seems to have faltered, when it comes to your own pronouncements. Of course Russia wouldn’t try to “take” Poland if there was no NATO. And you have zero evidence that they would. You’re a fucking clown, and you say stupid shit.

Actually, the USG did lie to the Russians and say NATO wouldn’t expand eastward (after “expanding� eastward to include all of reunified Germany).

Who exactly made that claim and how would it be legally binding?

Could a diplomat from Siberia make a verbal claim that is legally binding to BRICS?

NATO has very clear rules and procedures. Limiting NATO membership would require a vote by all members.

It isn’t the fault of NATO if the Russians didn’t understand how the organization works. In any case you are working on hearsay. You are correct that they had nothing in writing.

Russia would never agree to security limits based on an American diplomat retelling a conversation. That’s ridiculous and such a standard would never be held to any country. It’s basically “Cause Bob Johnson said so at lunch”.

And they do recognized them. They had to know where they were before rolling over them and fucking the idiot kike-tool Ukrainians in the ass.

So you agree that they violated the 1994 Budapest Memorandum by invading then, correct?

Do you think they should have invaded Finland first if the goal was to stop NATO from expanding?

“Budapest memorandum� was not an agreement. It was just as it says on the cover: a memo, non-binding.

A memo huh? Just jotting down a memo?

Well you’re wrong as it is a signed agreement that contains these sections:
Refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of the signatories to the memorandum, and undertake that none of their weapons will ever be used against these countries, except in cases of self-defense or otherwise in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.

Respect the signatory’s independence and sovereignty in the existing borders (in accordance with the principles of the CSCE Final Act).[7]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_Memorandum

Which means Russia signed an agreement to not attack Ukraine and respect their 1994 borders.

Video Link

“Please use rational cause and effect thinking like a White man to explain how a Jewish diplomat who was 4 levels from the director was able to cause a coup.”

Please explain why it takes explaining as to how Nuland could foment a coup. It’s one of those ipso facto things. I’d think a reasonable person would need an explanation as to why someone in Nuland’s position isn’t capable of fomenting a coup.

“Do explain how it was Nuland and not the Ukrainian Parliament that removed a corrupt pro-Russian president who is on video looting his own mansion before fleeing to Russia.”

Explain how these things are mutually exclusive, the way you’re implying.

P.S., are you a kike or a zionist? If you are, I’ll save us both some time and stop engaging with you as if you might be human.

P.P.S., never mind, life’s too short, and you absolutely stink of kike.

Actually, the USG did lie to the Russians and say NATO wouldn’t expand eastward (after “expanding” eastward to include all of reunified Germany).

Stupid flathead Russians didn’t get it in writing, of course, but that doesn’t mean the lying kike-simp American gov’t didn’t tell the lie. Which they did.

“Russia did however sign an agreement to recognize the 1991 borders of Ukraine. That was signed by Russian as part of the 1994 Budapest Memorandum.”

And they do recognized them. They had to know where they were before rolling over them and fucking the idiot kike-tool Ukrainians in the ass.

Friedbrain is just another kike nepo-baby who came out of nowhere using dark money to dominate a choke point that a truth-speaking goyim might have dominated, and we can’t have that, now can we?

He’s obviously got an IQ around 100.

“Budapest memorandum” was not an agreement. It was just as it says on the cover: a memo, non-binding.

When the Soviets allowed for Germany’s reunfication, they were promised that NATO wouldn’t move an inch eastward.

That was never a promise made by NATO.

Go ahead and source it.

Fact Check: NATO Did NOT Sign Agreement Not To Expand Eastwards After Soviet Union’s Fall
https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2023/05/fact-check-nato-did-not-sign-an-agreement-not-to-expand-eastwards-after-soviet-union-fall.html

A single member cannot speak on the behalf of the organization. A change in policy would require a vote which didn’t happen.

You might want to fact-check what you read from pro-Putin bloggers.

Russia did however sign an agreement to recognize the 1991 borders of Ukraine. That was signed by Russian as part of the 1994 Budapest Memorandum.

Propaganda jew interviews NWO jew.

What more do you need to know?

What a joke!

When the Soviets allowed for Germany’s reunfication, they were promised that NATO wouldn’t move an inch eastward. But it moved by hundreds of miles. Well, it’s time to roll NATO back to where it used to be. Liars and cheats deserve their comeuppance.

Why should all Ukrainians want to die because they hate Russians so much, because they want to destroy the Russian Orthodox Church, because they want to close down all Russian media, because they want to close down Russian political parties, because they want to ban Russian language, burn Russian books, ban Russian culture, tear down Russian monuments, join NATO and the EU, celebrate Bandera and the UkroNazis? Does this make sense? Well, if so they want so they should have. The only criticism one can have is that Russians are doing it peacemeal, instead of pressing the button and wiping them all out in an instant without incurring any losses of their own. As if anyone could do anything about it except complain in their yellow press, and complain about nothing at all. So an entire nation of hateful Nazi scum gets wiped out. Big deal. Pity for any decent few among them. It’s called “collateral” according to the terminology introduced by the West.

NATO wanted to expand directly to the Russian border, flipping Russia’s strongest ally against it in the process. Because of the positive ties between Russia and Ukraine, bringing it into NATO is much more serious than the Balts or Finland joining NATO.

For a time, Nuland was the face of the Western regime change operation in Ukraine against Russia. I agree she is not the architect of this project, but she was working to make it happen at a critical juncture (Maidan).

Avoiding nuclear war is pro-everyone.

I know nothing about rural Russians.

“What do Russians gain from this war?”

A large majority of Russians (80%+) support Putin and the SMO in Ukraine, they know what they gain. You are trolling by pretending not to know.

Putin will not even invade Ukraine West of the Dnieper river: why in the world would Putin or any Russian leader after Putin invade Western Europe?

Scott Ritter made a similar argument in Russian News. He wrote a long rant about how Russia won’t invade Ukraine and it’s all the imagination of the CIA.

What for?
There is nothing in Western Europe that Putin/Russia needs or wants.

They would like the Baltics back under their control and that is openly discussed on Russian totalitarian state tv.

Russians commonly view the Baltics and Poland as deserving to be ruled by Moscow. Putin is on record stating that the USSR should not have fallen and that it was an extension of the Russian empire.

They view the Baltics as lost territories. The Poles are viewed as a subclass of people. It’s very similar to the 1930s German view of Poland. Basically not a real state since they have had so many rulers.

If not for NATO they would absolutely try to take them back. When Putin was in the KGB he was adamantly against letting GDR leave.

Geographically, Europe is an appendix to the Eurasian landmass. Given how full of faeces it has become, the only thing Russia could gain by invading it is appendicitis.

Exactly. Both make you wonder how they attracted so many famous guests.

JJ, you are a consistent troll. I guess your style of trolling is distraction and exhaustion. If you were not intentionally misleading people your consistency might be comforting.

Did you want to give an explanation for why pointing out Jews in US government is acceptable but pointing out Jews in Russian government is trolling?

Nuland is half of a Neocon power couple.

I really don’t care if she is part of a 4 way satanic dyke couple. I’ve asked for an explanation of how she caused a pro-Russian president to take millions in bribes and then be removed by Parliament. Still no explanation. You’re not working with reality as it exists. You want everything to be about some Jewish conspiracy and with no questions asked.

The West turned Ukraine into a pawn to fight a proxy war against Russia. I don’t know why you try to hide this information. Your fellow travelers are proud of this evil project and are not shy about throwing it in everyone’s face.

Did you want to try explaining how it is the pro-White position to support Russia?

What do rural Russians gain from this war? Go ahead and explain. As with the “Nuland coup” there hasn’t been a rational explanation.

I judge wars based on who gains and loses. What do Russians gain from this war? We know that US defense industries are having record profits. You can allege conspiracy and malice on the part of US leaders but that still isn’t an explanation for why the Russian people should die for land beyond their 1991 borders. You simply haven’t given a rational explanation for why they should lose sons and fathers. Russia has plenty of land. Why should some Russian girl lose her father? Why is that needed? What do the people gain over US shareholders?

Thanks for posting an article that backs up Greenwald’s claims. BTW that article contains this gem:

Nuland played a key role in the violent Western-backed coup in Kiev in 2014, which toppled Ukraine’s democratically elected president, Viktor Yanukovich.

Your video does not show that she pressured a head of state into accepting a position. It only shows her opinion on the subject.

Now you’re just playing dumb. Nuland was representing the US gov’t, Ukraine’s top backer. She was not a private citizen from a think tank.

(Glenn Greenwald, a known Putin supporter)

Are Naftali Bennet and Davyd Arakhamia also Putin supporters?

The Awesome Negress says it like it is.

Aaaaand, there it is.

Candace accuses Seth of making jokes about white people because he’s “racially a Jew� who is “hiding behind satire.� pic.twitter.com/brTvMKz9lH

— A 🌷 (@AThinksAloud) January 7, 2025

Moscow wants a buffer zone between Russia and the West (NATO). I think the value of this buffer to the Kremlin is 2/3 symbolic and 1/3 practical. If the Russian border gets moved to the Dniepr then Western Ukraine may become this buffer. Russia does not want to control this area, but the West may force this state of affairs in an effort to weaken Russia. At the moment this seems pretty likely. It will take several years.

Finland dropping out of NATO might be one way to avoid this. This would be a tacit acknowledgement that Russia’s buffer idea has validity. At some point the Finns will realize that joining NATO was the stupidest thing they could ever do.

JJ, you are a consistent troll. I guess your style of trolling is distraction and exhaustion. If you were not intentionally misleading people your consistency might be comforting.

Nuland is half of a Neocon power couple. She is married to Robert Kagan who is the cofounder of the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) which created one of the most evil warmongering projects in Western history. The NATO and CIA and Neocon schemes to break up Russia are well known. Flipping Ukraine has always been a central part of this pressure campaign against Russia.

The West turned Ukraine into a pawn to fight a proxy war against Russia. I don’t know why you try to hide this information. Your fellow travelers are proud of this evil project and are not shy about throwing it in everyone’s face.

{….after Putin invaded…..}

IF Putin invaded.

Which will never happen.
Putin will not even invade Ukraine West of the Dnieper river: why in the world would Putin or any Russian leader after Putin invade Western Europe?

What for?
There is nothing in Western Europe that Putin/Russia needs or wants.
Nothing but trouble.
If NATO/Western Europe attacks Russia — for Ukraine — then it will go nuclear very quickly and it will be lights out for Western Europe. Oreshniks with nuclear warheads will be raining down on England, France , Germany, Poland,…….

I’d love to see the millions of Muslims in Western Europe, after Putin invaded, being told that there is no more free ride. I’d really love to see them shot after they started rioting under Russian occupation. Unlike the Western cucks, the Russians will not play games.

Yea Anglin why would anyone dare suggest that Russia would attack a NATO member. Only idiots would discuss such ideas.

Russian state media discusses nuking Britain.

Video Link
In another recent video they talk about how cutting internet cables is fair game. Well that is actually an attack since it wasn’t in international waters.

Oh and the Dr.No looking host is Putin’s proudly Jewish chief propagandist who hides a male model son in London:
https://mythdetector.com/en/what-do-we-know-about-the-modelling-career-of-daniil-solovyov-and-who-is-depicted-on-the-viral-pictures/

Looks like he married a tall White woman to offset his short genes. Both he and Putin are around 5’1.

Seems you don’t know the dwarf and his henchmen. Or you just go out of your way to ignore his Jewish media pal while railing about Jewish media in the West.

Max:

While Anglin calls Fridman “bizarro Rogan” I think he’s closer to “bizarro Nima” of Dialogue Works.

Johnson has got to be Jewish given his reactions to various triggers.

Everyone note that Wokechoke is still unable to provide a rational explanation for his support of Putin. The 2.5 week special operation has been going on for 3 years and Wokechoke is still unable to articulate 2 or 3 sentences on why it is pro-White to support Russia.

As with the estrogen ridden liberal woman he can only make personal accusations against those damn critical thinking White men that undermine his precious narrative.

He still calls the critics Jews even though we were right about this war being a stupid idea where Christian Slavs would die and the Western status quo wouldn’t change. NATO has expanded by two countries and US defense companies have had record profits. He doesn’t deny that at all.

He doesn’t deny that around half a million Christians have died or that Russia’s birth rate is at an all time low. Russian Slavs actually had more children under the USSR.

He doesn’t deny that the Ruble hit a 10 year low against the dollar. Hey remember all the “dollar is doomed” posters when this war started? They also called the critics Jews even though one of the main proponents of the theory was Jewish. But I guess that Jewish youtube bloggers get a pass if they play the right notes.

He can’t explain how this war does anything for us.

All he can do is yell JEW and hope the critics get bored with the idiots and move on to something else.

Say it again Wokechoke, it’s all you have. You’re unable to explain yourself just like the frustrated liberal woman who is faced with unwanted facts.

What did Nuland do exactly? I don’t understand the obsession with a 4th level diplomat.

Weeks after the war began in 2022 both sides were on the verge of a peace agreement until Nuland and Boris Johnson convinced Ukraine to back out, according to then-Israeli PM Naftali Bennett and Ukraine’s lead negotiator Davyd Arakhamia.

That is not what the video shows.

Here is the story from a Russian source:
https://www.rt.com/news/603708-ukraine-istanbul-us-nuland/

She was giving her opinion in an interview.

Your video does not show that she pressured a head of state into accepting a position. It only shows her opinion on the subject.

The peace agreement you are referring to was never proposed to Zelensky and the host of that video (Glenn Greenwald, a known Putin supporter) did not investigate the weapons clause to which she referred.

The proposal included requiring that Ukraine hand over their long range artillery and also not be a part of NATO. That is why it was rejected and not because of a Jewish conspiracy.

Or go ahead and explain as to how that wouldn’t simply be a trick to get Ukraine to demilitarize so Russia can then invade again.

I asked for how she caused a coup with her Jew powers. That is the common accusation that no one has explained.

Both Zelensky and Friedman are JMJ or Jewish-made-Jews.

What did Nuland do exactly? I don’t understand the obsession with a 4th level diplomat.

Weeks after the war began in 2022 both sides were on the verge of a peace agreement until Nuland and Boris Johnson convinced Ukraine to back out, according to then-Israeli PM Naftali Bennett and Ukraine’s lead negotiator Davyd Arakhamia.

In fact Nuland herself admitted it:

Video Link

It’s like the Bob Zimmerman album. It’s just Jew on Jew instead of Blonde on Blonde.

Namely fake folksy shit.

Johnson has got to be Jewish given his reactions to various triggers.

This is true. These areas are so concrete and rebar these days.

Every large town is like a bunker complex.

The powers-that-be are pushing for a Trump war in Ukraine.

The English voiceover sounds weird, but Volodymyr can be hard to listen to. This approach also may have a wider audience.

I assume it is full Western propaganda designed to establish a so-called “moderate” Ukrainian position which is completely unacceptable to Russia and therefore keeps the fighting alive.

These two do not seem to be the brightest bulbs. Are there any points where they trip on the narrative and give away a useful tidbit?

Glad we are that you took some time away from helping OJ look for the real killers to weigh in on issues in some deep intellectual water.

Oh…, that’s right, your grasp of the obvious, is commensurate with your tenuous erudition re: history and current events over the last 75 years.

Let’s start off with the fact that we have had our asses handed to us in most every conflict since Vietnam (Gulf of Tonkin = Lies – WMD = Lies 20 years of lies in Afghanistan etc.) but now, oh sure, what is a couple of hundred billion to prop up some Jew fuck that answers to the Rothschilds, BlackRock, Boeing, Lockheed Martin and the panoply of Neocon killers who live all along the Acela Corridor making bank on the backs of the dead and fooling toaster oven IQ’s like yours into knots every time someone busts out a new flag (This one is so, so pretty, yellow and blue!) and waxes less than poetically about “democracy”.

How ’bout this gargoyle.

In 1823 Americans sorely sick of nations all over the globe interfering in our affairs, produced, President Monroe’s “Monroe Doctrine”. Essentially, it stated that if you came too close, got into our backyard, we would react and react violently. We used this doctrine to invade Panama and Grenada and, oh yeah, when the Russians put missiles in Cuba.

Now, not being very informed on our freshly remembered past, you might not be aware of the use of this doctrine, by the Russians, to do EXACTLY WHAT THE RUSSIANS DID IN THE UKRAINE WHEN WE DECIDED TO HAVE THEM JOIN NATO, PUT BIOLOGICAL LABS FULL OF GOD KNOWS WHAT THERE AND TO YES, PUT FUCK’N MISSILES THERE.

There are actually many, many more reasons why the Russians should resist the NATO NEOCON whack jobs that want suzerainty over lands 10s of thousands of miles away from their own countries (Greedy Jews wanting control of oil, ((Soros has been at war with Russia in Ukraine in one way or another for 25 years)) cash and seeking more wage slaves to “work” the highest quality land on earth – Ukraine is like Iowa in that the glaciers stopped there and anything will grow there.) and of course, just the genetic disposition that Jews have to control everything by tricking salt of the earth fools like you into signing up for a “forever war” to save “democracy”.

Hope that is “white” enough for ya.

“Neutrality” is not an option. The Ukraine can either exist within the American sphere or it can exist within the Russian sphere. If one wants it to exist within the American sphere, then he wants Russia to be defeated and destroyed, which means he also wants China to be defeated, which means he wants American global domination. There is no possible neutral stance. It’s obvious why John Johnson wants American domination, since he is a Jew (as revealed by his histrionic reaction to that Jewish rave slut being “raped” and killed), but there is no reason for anyone who is not a Jew or a homosexual to desire this.

“Lex Fridman is a fascinating case study – and a great litmus test of a person’s judgment, in a sense..

On the surface, he’s the most soft, kindly, unoffensive baby-faced fellow, with the most impressive list of guests, some of whom are legitimately fascinating and worthwhile listens.

But watch closely as to the net-effects of this ‘can’t we all just get along and love one another’ attitude and approach, and how it manifests:

He called Epstein ‘just some rich guy’, completely denying any larger conspiracy, even the patently obvious m05sad connections.

He repeatedly (if indirectly) defends many of the worst people on earth, seemingly denying even the possibility of corruption, conspiracy, or any happenings that are readily visible at a superficial glance.

He did more effective damage control for big pharma than perhaps anyone else in the public sphere, bringing several of these execs on and allowing them to state their case in full, relatively unchallenged and uninterrupted.

I could go on citing enough examples like this to fill a novel..

Leaving aside his intelligence/Israeli connections for a moment, and his out-of-nowhere rise to extreme prominence (reminiscent of ‘h3h3’ and others) practically overnight – consider for a moment that the net-effect of his approach is to both provide a platform for some of the most shamelessly and brazenly corrupt individuals and institutions in the world, while disarming the audience, and then working to reorient their framework into one of oblivious and naive trust. “Let’s just give everyone the benefit of the doubt – even if they’ve proven time and time again to not deserve it, and the costs of being wrong here are astronomical, lets just be kind!”

By kind, he seems to mean ‘permissive’, ‘passive’.. ‘unthinking’ and ‘uncritical’.

For the longest time I wanted to like the guy, the nice-guy routine is superficially convincing.. yet I’d suggest it’s figures like this that most powerfully work to keep us from reacting in a healthy and natural way to men like Gates, Soros, jab manufacturers, Epstein/Maxwell.

It’s almost like that’s his very role.

Though, if true, this would be something of a conspiracy – and Lex makes it clear that these essentially don’t exist.

If certain forces were to manufacture a pop culture figure who would most efficiently keep people from asking the most important questions – or arriving at the most reasonable suspicions based on the totality of our context picture – I suspect it’d be an exacting duplicate of Lex

important postscript…

Many of those most hoodwinked by his approach are genuinely good people, who deserve some patience (not mockery). A reminder that many innately trustworthy people can’t help but become overly trusting, as resulting side-effect..

a strength, in healthy and well-oriented and relatively homogeneous environments in which corruption isn’t rampant and all-pervasive.
a weakness, in environments like our own at the present.. in which they risk being thoroughly (often effortlessly) duped, at every turn.

They’re also the type that once they understand, once they’re able to make that turn or shift, make for sturdy, principled, invaluable allies.”

I’m also waiting for an explanation from Anglin on why White people should support Russia and not Ukraine.

What’s wrong with neutrality?

Zelensky said that Putin was planning to invade and conquer all of Europe.

Probably the best thing that could happen to Europe, but why would a sane Russian want to get himself so covered with trash?

Zelensky said that Putin was planning to invade and conquer all of Europe.

Well Anglin, do you think Putin should invade and conquer all of Europe?

Not the first interview in which Lex is showing no depth and all grift.

Publishing as a metronome, on any field of expertise, is a dead venue for most alt. channels. It is obvious in a society based on greed. We should as an elite(agency of some kind) tweak the systemics, not our standing to the most. Another Alexander Mercouris peddling t-shirts, a Scott Ritter(hammering on morals, while our elites exclude this from any call to action), a Nima(wise enough to leave all initiative to guests, which is exploited to the listener’s benefit by the likes of a Krainer(some good core understandings) and some others).

Leave the rest to youtube, tweaking algorithms, to coders, all for open source, as in begging “plea…se google pick me up as corporate fodder”. They(the above) have a word for it, “monetise”.

Vicky Nuland and Liz Cheney would clear the shelves as they leaked uncontrollably into their drawers.

What did Nuland do exactly? I don’t understand the obsession with a 4th level diplomat.

Please use rational cause and effect thinking like a White man to explain how a Jewish diplomat who was 4 levels from the director was able to cause a coup.

Do explain how it was Nuland and not the Ukrainian Parliament that removed a corrupt pro-Russian president who is on video looting his own mansion before fleeing to Russia.

Note that said president’s own pro-Russian party disavowed him as a criminal.

I’m also waiting for an explanation from Anglin on why White people should support Russia and not Ukraine.

Please provide a rational explanation based on gains/losses instead of sounding like Scooby Doo and repeating JEWBY JEWBY JEWS as if that is enough.

Or just fill in this sentence:

Christian Slavs on both sides need to kill each other in trenches because……….?

Please show us your ability to think and speak rationally like a White man on Ukraine. Thank you.

Yeah, too bad Lex hasn’t read Scott Horton’s new book, Provoked: How Washington Started the New Cold War with Russia and the Catastrophe in Ukraine, and asked just a few simple questions based on it.

But I guess if he had, the interview would’ve ended with Lex having to use his MMA skills to restrain Zelensky, with a rear naked choke hold or reverse armbar submission.

I kind of like Lex. And he’s certainly not dumb, he has a Ph.D. in computer and electrical engineering and his dad is a physics professor. He just has a very laid back demeanor. I think having Zelensky as a guest was for the ratings and/or attention and I’m sure the State Department and CIA was pestering to have him on.

Zelensky’s star is fading fast and he’ll be dead or in obscure exile in the near future. And Ukraine will be the size of Czechia (after Poland, Hungary, Romania, Moldova gobble up western Ukraine). Sad for 1.5 million Ukrainians who gave up their lives and limbs.

Andrew’s writing is kray kray.
And that’s why I luv ‘im.

Lex is hooked hard on Valium. Jesus, I always think he is the most somnambulant interviewer in recorded history. He kinda looks like a sloth.

“They’ll say Putin will invade Poland, …”

Poland is chocked the fuck full, FULL of grouchy Polacks who do NOT want to be invaded and are in no way gonna till the land, bend the knee and hand over resources to the Russians.

Jesus. The Donbas is 66% Russian and it took 2 fuckin years to take that.

Even Hitler on cocaine would not invade Poland now.

Imagine how much money it would cost to keep the Polacks “down on the farm” after you rolled in with tanks and troops.

I can just see the millions of neocon whack jobs all over the world jumping in the air, clicking their heels together at the realization that a new land war in Europe was under way.

Vicky Nuland and Liz Cheney would clear the shelves as they leaked uncontrollably into their drawers.

https://www.graylinemedical.com/products/kimberly-clark-poise-extra-absorbency-incontinence-pads-poise-incontinence-pad-liner-extra-absorbency-9-12-19564?variant=31853460357177&msclkid=11921b0702de1d37aa1f7c7ceb100ac6

NO ONE IS INVADING FUCK’N POLAND.

While Trump’s first term was indeed not as advertised, it was not a complete failure. He really did reduce immigration, both illegal and legal. Exactly as you would expect, rents started to trend down, real wages started to trend up, homeless declined, child poverty declined, etc.

Biden’s masters have committed base treason and opened the United States to a foreign invasion. This is not ‘left’, it is a brutal vicious anti-worker policy that has reduced real wages, driven rents up, spiked child poverty, spiked homelessness, etc. Exactly as planned.

It’s called supply and demand. You may not believe in it, but the rich sure do.

One wonders how Trump was allowed to win a second term. One notes how much of the billionaire class came on board towards the end. One notes how little wailing there was from the corporate press this time. Perhaps Trump sold us out.

One wonders if all the lawfare directed at Trump will now be allowed to quietly die. One wonders if there will not be any more “Russiagate” hoaxes.

The big thing to watch is total net immigration. If that trends down to be close to his first term, then at at least some level, Trump did not betray us. If those numbers remain anywhere close to the current numbers, then yes, we were betrayed. We shall see.

Its all 100% tax deductible. so everybody gets to pay for a few’s smug kindness.

Its bad diets with missing vitamins and minerals. people complain about California being snooty and faddish, but they are up on diet and nutrition where it counts. they have been for seven decades.

Chechen chieftain also call BS on the West.

Chechen chief Ramzan Kadyrov offers his opinion on child transsexualism ���⚧� in the West, including in @KMGVictoria’s Vancouver. pic.twitter.com/Q1ddTQUXev

— David Pinsen (@dpinsen) August 16, 2022

Fortunately it doesn’t matter who the presidential puppet ruler is. CIA will hamstring, kill, or purge him. And the SCTO will neutralize the policies that CIA imposes.

Nah. The normies won’t see it. They are so demoralized they are incapable of seeing. The Indians will keep coming, and the Trumptards will not see it.

When I was in training with the Army, the NCO’s had a somewhat retarded fellow calling marching drills for laughs. It was never funny, and even less so is it funny on the national level.

“Deal is Trump’s favorite word; everyone knows that. How this is consistent with Russia’s interests is still unclear,� Nebenzia remarked.�

No comment necessary.

But Trump just called for the ultimate war shill and creep-job Mike Johnson to remain as Speaker of the House

Trump has always supported Johnson. In fact, Trump affectionately calls him “MAGA Mike.”

Trump was also the guy who told Johnson to pass the Ukraine funding “as a loan.” Johnson was originally going to use the Ukraine funding as a bargaining chip to get some kind of (symbolic) deal with Democrats on immigration or something. If you recall, they had this whole fake opposition to funding the Ukraine thing going among Republicans, but Trump told them to just go ahead and ram it through without getting anything at all. This means that Trump is objectively more of a war shill than MAGA Mike Johnson, who at least wanted the war funding to be contingent upon getting something for American people. Trump told him “no, fuck the American people. They will eat whatever bullshit I feed them and they will like it.” And Trump was right.

Speaker Johnson continues to parade around conservative media boasting of how Trump "championed" the "loan" provision of the Ukraine funding bill, which Johnson declares to be part of the new "America First" policy agenda — along with seizing Russian assets to give to Zelensky pic.twitter.com/4Pbz8csl0E

— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) April 25, 2024

It is the only article in thousands that gives realistic explanations to the humiliating defeat of Russia and the Axis of Resistance in Syria.

And yet, ignored by most with only one comment which, like this article has the merit of telling the obvious.

I hope Russia has unknown resources that can stop the disastrous failures of its actual president, because it looks more and more like Putin is not working for Russia but for anyone else.

Nato HQ in Brussels.
Tell everybody to take next Friday off.
Call Nato’s bluff.

Syria probably wouldn’t have existed as a state without Versailles either. The natural boundary appears to be a southern province of Turkey, though always subject to contest by Egypt or Iran as power ebbs and flows. By the look of it the place should be four separate states with a coastal Alawite enclave and a landlocked Kurdistan. Wouldn’t be such a basket case if it wasn’t next to this Israel entity either.
You’re still a Jewboy though. Jewish settlement there has caused no end of emigration from the Levant into Europe by darkies.

By the way in the not so perfect house analogy — your house is my house — aways was always will be.

From the bottom up there is no love loss between Russia and Finland. Russia as never faired well against Finland. And note: Finland now rests on Russia’s border — NATO butted against Russia. One of Russia’s key complaints. Your question suggests that I have an answer to Russia’s peculiar choices.

The Finnish corridor would be easier to defend in my view.

Correct, Ukraine had not been given a greenlight as Russia well knew. But the spontaneous rejection of the Russia’s man in the presidency , the full scale rejection of breaking up the country sent alarm bells in the Kremlin. Despite having the inside track, they were rejected as partners going forward. Meanig they were going to lose access to Ukraines mineral reserves 5% percent of the world’s reserves.

This is a land grab.

And I fully agree that should Ukraine be granted access to NATO Russia will have two NATO states left and right, if Ukraine is granted access.

Russia wins. I invade yur home. You fight me off to the kitchen and the dining room. In the process I killyour son and daughter, I beat up your wife. We agree to a truce. But that truces includes that I keep the spaces I am have inside your home to include the ktchen. I win. Because the kitchen happens to include some of my relatives. I got what I wanted ad more.

This is not a stalemate in which oth sides lose. This is a romp in which I get you ktchen and more. And because I consider the whole house mine, I can set for my next run. As your neighbors have proven worthless to your defense and should they enter your home for a fight — they have been warned I will burn them to the ground.

Time is on my side. If Russia is not forced to leave Ukraine entirely, time will be on her side. Pres Putin’s agenda is against the west. If you listen to the BRICS nations they repeat the exact same arguments as Russia. This conflict is much larger than it appears in Ukraine. And we in the US had better wake up And prepare for war as a deterrence. Right now we look weak. Russia gains more and more of Ukraine’s house every day. An Russian error, incompetence’s, etc, bad economy — is nothing to the land they acquire. And that is what matters.

!st Russia moved in to secure er Naval Base, the next morning the world wakes u to the annexation of Crimea. There is or reason for Russia to stop.

UkroNazis did attack Russians in the Ukraine, Russian media, Russian culture, Russian parties, Russian churches, Russian everything and you expect Russia just to watch?

And what was the worst attack?

Please tell us and provide a source.

There are over 20 active neo-nazi groups in Russia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo-Nazism_in_Russia

The founder of Wagner was a neo-nazi and endorsed by Putin. It was later taken over by his Jewish chef.

Should Putin have started with Russia first?

I just don’t think there is any way forward to remove Russia without NATO, EU ad US involvement. If they ar=gree to a cease fire ceding erriory to Russia, Russia wins.

And how would that be a win if Putin stated that the primary goal is to stop the Eastward expansion of NATO? He never said that the goal was to take a chunk of Ukraine.

So maybe Putin should have invaded Finland and called it historical Russia?

Ukraine still hasn’t been given the greenlight on NATO. Before the invasion they had at least two votes opposing (France and Germany). The claim that Ukraine was about to join was a lie and affirmed by Finland’s quick admittance. Why wasn’t Ukraine quickly admitted after 2014? The excuses for this invasion don’t add up.

“Ya get in a Heat
and you get in a sulk
but ya still keep beating your meat to pulp…”

just realized – you’re an acolyte of the Chabad Lubivitch degenerates!

Have you reached the heights of ecstasy down in your whack off basement?

Wokechoke again calls me a Jew because he can’t rationally explain himself like a White man.

I support letting Arabs choose their leaders. Assad never would have been elected in a Sunni majority country. Recent videos show that his torture chambers were in fact real and not the creation of Western media or the CIA. Turns out that human rights organizations were correct. Now it is only a matter of time before more evidence that shows his use of Sarin gas in their civil war. Of course his defenders knew that was most likely the case.

You better mentally prepare yourself for the possibility that Putin was alerted to the plan and chose to do nothing. He most likely wants remaining Russian units to be in Ukraine. His junior dictator pal Assad just had to eat a sh-t sandwich on the deal. The latest rumor is that Putin is robbing him of the billions that he transferred to Russia.

Putin’s 2.5 week special operation has led to an expansion of Israel into Syria. He would have had plenty of firepower if he did not invade his smaller Orthodox neighbor.

But you probably don’t have the guts to face that reality. As with the typical liberal White woman you can’t just face what is in front of you. Instead of screaming “UZ A RACIST” you instead go with “UZ A JEW” because you don’t want to rationally look at evidence that may contradict your worldview. You’re just as emotionally driven as an unhinged cat lady who yells at images of Trump on TV.

Shut up Trump!

“The UK went to the other end of the world to defend a few of its citizens on a rock in the South Atlantic and you’re telling Russians not to defend its own people in a border region.”

They are not Russian citizens. They are Ukrainians. If they want to be Russian citizens and operate as Russians under Russia’s laws — then they should return to Russia.

The Falklands were sovereign to the UK Great Britain. The territories in Ukraine are sovereign to Russia, but Ukraine. They are not similar circumstances. If you agree, I am unclear why you raise them as similar.

When the US went to Granada as unneccesary as it may have been — the US removed US citizens, any that wanted to go. They did not attempt to seize territory and claim that it is rightfully theirs.

Excuse the add on. I have been perplexed about your agreement that the example is not comparable.

You opposed Assad and reckon the removal of Saddam to have been good business. Shut Up Jewboy!

What if they don’t want a relationship?

Come to think of it there’s never been a survey of this taken of porn addicts; you morality crusaders always just assume based on nothing they all want a bitch…. while you also rant about how godawful women are and should be shunned or replaced. Well, maybe porn addicts did just that, did what you all counsel but were too weak to do yourselves? Maybe they’re smarter than you all.

Feminists oppose porn for the same reason they oppose prostitution: to restrict the supply of pussy to drive up the price.

Christians are nuts. They fight their own interests and allies with their dying breath.

If you tried to legalize prostitution then you would face a feminist/Christian alliance.

There are both Christian men and women that basically believe that men should not be allowed sex if they aren’t married. But it’s mostly bitter church ladies that would probably prefer all men to be as unhappy as them. They view single men as existing to serve others. Women don’t desire sex as much as men and project their ability to curb such inclinations. Christian denial of nature. Liberal feminists do the same as they want to believe that gender is mostly made up (a social construct).

You are correct that legalizing prostitution drives down the value of sex in dating. It’s simple supply and demand.

Prostitution is simply part of life in third world countries while White men have let their women talk them out of it.

When White men run brothels they get the profit and it can help small rural towns. In the current clown town a woman can make thousands a day using onlyfans and that stays in the city.

I have a single friend who has spent thousands on strip clubs. It’s ridiculous that he can only pay to be teased. He is paying to be teased and that money is then used for hair/make-up/foreign cars.

How about an e-scooter duel?

Video Link
Merry Christmas to Anglin and the rest of the Dwarf Hitler believers.

I’m sure Putin will go after the Jews after he signs another trade deal with Israel and shrugs as they take more Syrian land.

That must be it.

Maybe Putin will pick up Kanye on a magic sleigh and hunt down the Jews with AK-47s.

Yes, and Schlomo knows that porn adds to passivity. It’s far easier to whack off to porn than to go out an find a suitable relationship. Then when porn gets to the seriously addictive stage, the poor bastards aren’t doing anything else except watching porn, thinking about porn and working to get more porn (or at least working to pay their cable/WIFI bill). They aren’t thinking or doing anything else -Schlomo loves that.

I did say I had the sense to eschew this kind of dreck. Nice try🙂

Correction

My mistake, I had thought that the UK gave up the Falkland islands — that is incorrect. They remain under the sovereignty of the UK. The Fauklands are not seeking separation from the UK, quite the opposite.

That is not the case for the areas being discussed in Ukraine.

Here is a great article on the self inflicted damage politicians can do to a country.

https://mises.org/mises-wire/how-germany-destroyed-its-economy-and-how-fix-it

The very idea that the Ukrainians living in the regions in question are or were Russian nationals is simply inaccurate. But it does represent some of the very peculair word games Russia egages in. Very similar to another country that shall remain namesless for now.

The rukes that she should be geld to are those she as signed unto.

1. Ukraine is sovereign

2. Sovereign states and their internal affairs are sacrosanct

3. Russia does not get to arbitril dismiss them because they are inconvenient

4. As a member of the United Nations she adhere’s to the sovereign status of her fellow members.

5. that she has agreed to engage in good faith conduct and communication

6. Russians living in Ujraine are not Russian citizens, if so theyare foreigners and as such shoyld move to Rssia of they don’t like the rules of Ukraine

And the UK gave that rock up. Bit more importantly, that rosk was not a sovereign state — though clearly and the UK did not recognize it as such . That is not the case with Russia. Russia has repeatedly recognized Ukraine as a sovereign state.

One could compare the conditions if one were apples and the other not oranges. Again, the seeming inability to recognize what makes a situation salient is interesting. If you agree to color in the lines then stay in the lines.

I’m not so sure about the ‘protective capacity’ of Orthodoxy even in the nations that almost fully subscribe to it.

This is a test:

https://schengen.news/romania-issued-over-77000-work-permits-this-year-in-efforts-to-fill-market-gaps/

https://schengen.news/romania-needs-up-to-300000-foreign-workers-to-address-workforce-shortages-in-202

Keep in mind that Romania is already over-rich in “immigrants of all hues and that this is a country so poor in jobs that it has lost 8 million Romanians over the last 20 years.

What’s the use of religious ecstacy if you effectively lose the character of your nation?

All these images are extensions of the known. It’s all we have to go on. In this vast universe, should we last as a species, we may come in contact with vastly different life forms, that make sense in their biological environment, in much the same way here on earth we find oddities around the volcanic vents in the sea floor. Most of the images I saw are carnival freaks that would have no reason to evolve in that way, just a distortion of eyes, ears, nose, skin, extremities, what-have-you. Having read The Biological Time Bomb, Gordon Rattray Taylor, 1968, I was immersed in his futuristic exploration of what was to come with genetic engineering on the horizon. We have since come a long way in mapping the genome of many species, but seem to have a problem with the evil in our world, who believe virus gain of function research is how best to spend our time & $, rather than the eradication thereof. Gordon touches on the idea of cyborgs, with computing and computers still in their infancy, and didn’t have a clue to the AI we know today.

Given that there has been very unpalatable research done in the past on human subjects, I can only assume the same is going on today, in clandestine labs under top secret clearance, that involve elements described in Gordon’s book, including experiments in cyborg systems. As the discovery of these past experiments included non volunteers, so may the current research I presume is happening. This, I believe, is where biologic evolution will finally begin departure from its natural course into the unknown.

You are writing as if there are some kind of rules that Russia should respect, like not protecting Russians in Ukraine. US and the West set the precedent that there are no rules and hence Russia can do whatever it wants. The UK went to the other end of the world to defend a few of its citizens on a rock in the South Atlantic and you’re telling Russians not to defend its own people in a border region. Who are you trying to fool?

It’s the Kali Yuga/end times/etc. Children don’t seem to have a future worth anything.

No, the Ukrainians did not attack Russia, whether any of them or all of them were Nazis or not. All the players have sought to include Russia, treat Russia with respect, bent over backwards to accommodate Russia. One of the key factors in those negotiations was the removal of all foreign militaries. Russia refused. So they cannot in any regard claim some manner of reasonable disposition. The negotiations were not about Russia, but parties in Ukraine. Russia attempted to engage in the process while holding a gun to the head of Ukraine. I am not sure you know this but no one negotiating with a gun to their head can be expected to operate in good faith. Ukraine, of course rejected the imposition.

Furthermore and more importantly, who cares what Russia wanted. These negotiations were between factions in Ukraine.

Russia has repeatedly sat down at others’ table and demanded something she is not entitled to demand. And even when they are accommodated would reject the accommodation or change the rules, or would change their mind or would claim that the rules in play did not apply to them.

She has chosen war and war is what she understands. I stand alone, but unless Ukraine is given direct support to remove Russia and for me that now includes Crimea, I think Russia wins this fight. Unless Russia leaves Ukraine by choice or otherwise Pres. Putin will have won. Whether he stops there is inconsequential, because minus the will to fight, the game is up.

Nice try. The issues regarding the Donbass, the Ligansk, ad other regions inside Ukraine are issues for Ukraine. These ethnic loyalties simply are not enough to cause.

Those regions sought independence, the country said no. Case closed. They fought for the same, they lost case closed. That Russia intevened militaily into the internal affairs of Ukraine was itself an act of war.

These were not Russia provinces. Ad the at case was settled long before 2014, It was decided when the USSR broke apart, reinforced when Russia acknowledged Ukraine as a sovereign nation. I appreciate the emotional ties, such as they were, but once your uncle moves to another country, then said uncle becomes subject to that countries choices. If your uncle attempts o overthrow the sate/the country — well, your military attempts to aid in tha subjects you o the same.

No, the Ukrainian s did not attack Russia, wherher en of them or all of hem were Nazis or not.

it may come to that but remember russia and china want the world, that they are about to inherit, to remain as intact as possible. imo they leave zelensky in place, because he is doing the maximum amount of damage to the zioukranazi cause as anyone could do and the same for e.u. and u.k.. when you have such incompetent dolts running your adversaries into the ground, why give them the casus belli, they desire to rally their citizenry, that are about to pull them down? like sun tzu said, why interfere when your enemies are destroying themselves?

UkroNazis did attack Russians in the Ukraine, Russian media, Russian culture, Russian parties, Russian churches, Russian everything and you expect Russia just to watch?

In all negotiations prior to the SMO Russia was willing to accept Lugansk and Donbass as autonomous provinces within Ukraine if only those UkroNazis would stop attacking the Russians and start respecting their rights. It has no choice but to keep on eating up regions of the Ukraine and threatening anyone who supports those UkroNazis.

If you’re only watching porn, aren’t you still an incel?

Any kids having their minds warped over that are weaklings. I see far worse than that in my sleep every night and I’m alright.

Consuming Porn is essentially being cucked. You are watching other people fuck while you whack off. Schlomo enjoys the wasted time that white men spend watching porn.

That’s the interesting thing about being in charge. You get to set the rules.

Laugh opinions vary.

You clutter the writing space with with your dialogue with yourself. Save your time. Nobody reads you anymore.

The Garden of Earthly Delights.

“Do you watch porn? I don’t. And haven’t for years.”

We always knew you were incel.

Bosch

The Catholic Church has gone protestant since Vatican II — circa 1965.

History note: Germany was not attacked because of NAzis. She was attacked because of her own expansionist ambitions executed by the the unprovoked use of force.

Maybe I said this already

Nazis — good grief.