to look at the Big Picture, so to speak, Harold..

in short, Donald J. Trump is the most evil man that has ever lived. Huh?

He is certainly among the most evil men that have ever lived, and he could very well be THE MOST EVIL; otherwise he wouldn’t have been installed into the highest political office in the land – especially at a time when the evil empire is collapsing, the jews are desperate and the risk of nuclear war is greater than at any time in the past.

He’s going to kick off Armageddon, because he is singularly that evil.

Armageddon is part evil and part chance. For example, if someone else had been president of Russia instead of Vladimir Putin, e.g. Dmitry Medvedev, Armageddon might already have happened due to biden’s risky provocations against Russia. If trump was not evil enough to risk planetary extinction for evil’s sake, he would not now be president. Destruction is America’s self-imposed fate, whether a mentally and morally defective moron like you happens to realize it or not.

He and in particular, everyone who voted for him, are all evil people.

Obviously, simple reasoning isn’t your strong suit but try and follow along (or better yet, maybe you can find a sympathetic adult in your neighborhood who can explain the following to you in simple child-like terms commensurate with your profound cognitive impairment): during his first term, trump proved himself to be a liar, mass murderer and consummate jew tool. No morally competent person would vote to install such a scumbag into the highest political office in the land. This is because if someone is knowingly and willingly instrumental in empowering an evil person to do evil, that person bears moral responsibility for any consequential evil. Do you see how that works, goofball?

Which is no surprise, because the United States has been the most uniquely evil nation of evil people, ever to exist.

Right?

Absolutely.

There’s something about TDS, that I have to admit that I sort of like. There is a significant swath of people out there, that for whatever reason, hate Donald Trump with a seething, visceral fanaticism that borders on (hell, exceeds!) pathological derangement.

Yo shit for brains, as I’ve said here many times in the past, I gave trump the benefit of the doubt in 2016 and voted for him. And he immediately betrayed me and the other anti-war/anti-interventionist voters who put him in office. He lied, he mass-murdered people, and he proceeded to do all kinds of evil and destructive things that went squarely against his election mandate and the best interests of his supporters and practically every living thing on this planet; trump set us up for biden and the evil that followed.

And, almost in every instance, these people are rude, arrogant, self-righteous assholes. Like you.

LOL! IOW I tell the truth and you Satanic judenfilth don’t like it. Coming from you, that’s a nice compliment. The only way you could actually insult me, you silly jew retard, would be if I somehow had your approval.

As anyone who’s read my comments knows, I don’t like Trump, but I recognize why good people voted for him. Mainly, to end the wars.

As always, nothing you say makes any sense, goofball.

But when it comes to your type, Harold, I have to admit that I get a kick out of seeing Donald being sworn in today, not because he’s going to be a good president, (he won’t), but because of what it must do to people like you. LOL

Yo shit for brains, you never run out of stupid things to say. The reinstallation of the evil orange clown as president is evil America’s fate. What trump’s win does to “people like (me)” is to prove me right.

People so full of hate and bile, that they’re unhinged in their vitriolic rage.

LOL! Yo shit for brains, you voted to install an unhinged, hate-filled, devil-worshiping, demon-possessed, psychotic psychopath into the highest political office in the land and then you try to project your pathetic assholish psyche onto me.

Just thinking…

Liar.

…about what today will mean for people like you, Harold, will put a little smile in my heart, in what would otherwise be just another day, when just another ZOG asshole will begin his betrayal of America.

I guess no one here should be surprised that you can’t compose a meaningful sentence, you silly jew retard.

But you have cheered up this day, knowing how seeing Trump so triumphant, is going to effect you.

LOL! Yet another second grade level word salad from the silly jew retard. (BTW, that would be affect, not effect, you silly jew retard).

You’re a crack head.

USSF are the most robotic executioners of ZioCon policy HOOOORAH and it provides them a license to kill, pay & benifits, and all the low-end pussy they can tap. Expecting them to stand and deliver against the ZioCons when it HASNT HAPPENED ONCE IN 70 FUCKING YEARS isn’t idiocy – it’s open propaganda and retardery.

You’re a literal goddamn regard and I name you thusly, or more likely a snake.

Are you really so stupid and/or ignorant of the facts..

your signature deflective nonsense..

all the time I have for your hapless, tiresome bullshit at the moment.

to look at the Big Picture, so to speak, Harold..

in short, Donald J. Trump is the most evil man that has ever lived. Huh?

He’s going to kick off Armageddon, because he is singularly that evil. He and in particular, everyone who voted for him, are all evil people. Which is no surprise, because the United States has been the most uniquely evil nation of evil people, ever to exist.

Right?

There’s something about TDS, that I have to admit that I sort of like. There is a significant swath of people out there, that for whatever reason, hate Donald Trump with a seething, visceral fanaticism that borders on (hell, exceeds!) pathological derangement. And, almost in every instance, these people are rude, arrogant, self-righteous assholes. Like you.

As anyone who’s read my comments knows, I don’t like Trump, but I recognize why good people voted for him. Mainly, to end the wars.

But when it comes to your type, Harold, I have to admit that I get a kick out of seeing Donald being sworn in today, not because he’s going to be a good president, (he won’t), but because of what it must do to people like you. LOL

People so full of hate and bile, that they’re unhinged in their vitriolic rage.

You and Liz Cheney and Adam Schiff and Joy Behar and Adam Kinzinger and William Kristol and Max Boot and David Frum and Hillary…

Just thinking about what today will mean for people like you, Harold, will put a little smile in my heart, in what would otherwise be just another day, when just another ZOG asshole will begin his betrayal of America.

But you have cheered up this day, knowing how seeing Trump so triumphant, is going to effect you.

For the next four years.

Enjoy it, chump.

Thanks Chris,

Though Ron obviously doesn’t fall into this category, most ‘intellectuals’ don’t see the propaganda because they have lots of intellectual prestige on the line. That’s the vanity which you were pointing out in your comment.

and shekels

Hitler was doing the same thing: massive deportations of perfectly indigenous Poles from Western Poland.

simply because they were Poles? Or because they were hostile to Germany? Which, as I understand it, lots of Poles were at the time.

It seems to me a bit like what’s going on in Ukraine today, where subtle differences between brothers are being exacerbated to make people hate each other, in service to some nefarious agenda of the elites. Who most likely are not even Ukrainian or Russian.

‘I’m fighting because you’re down here.’

this is, I suspect why most Ukrainian men fight, and they haven’t got the slightest idea about slaughter of thousands of Russian-speaking Ukrainians in the Donbass, by their government.

The elites pull the strings, and average guys die. Same as it ever was.

Hitler framed his invasion of Poland as a matter of defending ethnic Germans — but that wasn’t exactly the whole story.

I suspect a lot of it had to do with the treachery at Versailles, and Germany wanting a certain, (understandable) reckoning.

Upon reflection, I’m forced to reverse my position about
the difficulty of defining “self-defense” as
it pertains to the U.S. since 1933.

Since “Zion Declares War on Germany,” all major wars
of the U.S., including proxy wars but excluding those in
East Asia, have been fought to advance Jewish
or Israeli interests.

In effect, “American self-defense” has become a largely
fraudulent term which can only be accurately defined as
Jewish-Zionist aggression, under our flag.

Americans have been badly used by the bribed and
compromised vermin who pose as our leaders.
This is common knowledge around the World,
but is classified top-secret in the U.S.

Recently the police in London have allowed Zionists to get close to pro-Palestinian demonstrators. Earlier they kept them far apart. I suspect the hope was some incident would give the authorities a pretext to ban the protests altogether, and Zios have been trying to provoke trouble. However, protesters have been disciplined in response and refused to be provoked.

As I see it, to the extent it may be “hard to define,” that’s generally only the case until you put everything into proper moral, historical, military and political context – by looking at the big picture. And this is precisely what the propagandists here don’t want anyone to do. Once you consider the important details, things usually become much clearer, IMO.

https://skwawkbox.org/2025/01/18/exclusive-israel-supporter-arrested-after-punching-anti-genocide-marcher/

I was at this protest. I did not see this specific incident, but Zionist “counter-protesters” seeking to provoke people into attacking them is something I have seen. It looks like failure on this score caused the Zio to go on the offensive…

The only “justified” wars are in self-defense, but that is hard to define or
apply in a good many specific cases, recently illustrated by the
complex origins of the Ukraine and Gaza Wars.

‘On the contrary, no. If “(the IDF) are all guilty� of murder then so were all the U.S. troops that invaded Iraq in 2003, whether you happen to like it or not.’

Not really. What we regarded as criminal atrocities, and often prosecuted, the Jews celebrated and endorsed.

Nonsense. First, who’s “we”? Second, both the Iraq war and the war against Afghanistan were “criminal atrocities.” They were completely unjust wars of aggression and every person killed in those wars was murdered, whether you happen to like it or not.

“To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.”

https://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/judnazi.asp#common

And then there were the smaller atrocities within the larger atrocities; e.g. those war crimes exposed by Chelsea Manning, for which she was prosecuted.

https://progressive.org/latest/judging-the-u-s-for-its-war-crimes-chelsea-manning-kelly-190311/

‘On the contrary, no. If “(the IDF) are all guiltyâ€� of murder then so were all the U.S. troops that invaded Iraq in 2003, whether you happen to like it or not.’

Not really. What we regarded as criminal atrocities, and often prosecuted, the Jews celebrated and endorsed.

A German reporter interviewed a teen Afghan Mujahideen during our ill-fated
War against an imaginary enemy and got a similar answer,
“because they are here.�

Invading Afghanistan is always a mistake.

The only variable is how long it takes the invader to figure that out.

Suppose I told you (without providing any evidence) that your next-door neighbor was actually a monster from outer space who posed an extreme threat and that you should preempt the threat by killing him, accordingly, and you subsequently did kill him; would a jury acquit you of murder because you were ignorant, stupid/intellectually lazy and morally incompetent enough to take my barely asserted claim at face value and kill someone because of it?

wow Harold

not only is that a strawman, but you fit in absurd, obnoxious and insulting too!

Wow Rurik, your desperation is showing. No, it’s not a “strawman.” Obviously, it’s an analogy, entirely apropos, which can be compared to Bush’s war against Iraq (and for that matter, many other American crimes against humanity). The claim that Saddam Hussein was making WMD under the circumstances and the imploration that we urgently had to invade (ultimately resulting in the deaths of Saddam Hussein and hundreds of thousands of innocent people) as a matter of preemptive “self-defense,” would be no less preposterous than a claim that your neighbor is actually an alien from outer space that you need preemptively kill before he kills you. Are you really so stupid and/or ignorant of the facts surrounding the immoral, illegal and unconstitutional invasion of Iraq in 2003 that you don’t see it?

Pat Tillman had a civic and moral duty to at least do a little research into what he was getting himself into. Apparently he didn’t, and that was solely his fault, IMO.

apparently, he did, because ZOG put three bullets in his forehead at close range, when he did finally figure out the wars were based on lies.

Tillman obviously started out believing the lies about 9/11. Most people did. When he figured out that they were lies, they executed him. But that’s not good enough for you, huh Harold. He should have known from the beginning, because he had the Internet.

How many people in the world knew in May of 2002, that 9/11 was a false flag attack? I’d say maybe one percent, at best. But for you, Harold, everyone who didn’t know it immediately, was an evil murderer for failing to stop the wars.

More of your signature deflective nonsense. Unlike my analogy, your “argument” here is an actual strawman. Regardless of whether or not 9/11 was generally believed to be a false flag attack (by March 2003), the attack on Iraq and the mass murder of Iraqis under the circumstances was an entirely different matter. As I recall, the U.S. “government” wasn’t even trying to claim that Iraq had anything to do with 9/11. The war was completely unjustified.

In any case, as I already pointed out to you, Tillman himself said the Iraq war was “fucking illegal”; ipso facto he knew he was participating in mass murder. So why did he willingly deploy there in the first place? Apparently he either abdicated his due diligence or he didn’t really give a damn. He could’ve refused to deploy there or “deserted” like a handful of war resisters did and he could’ve declared conscientious objector status; he would’ve had a good legal case. Instead he did neither. He stayed there, betraying his enlistment oath and knowingly participating in mass murder.

Sorry but your implication that he was “misled” fails and you know it. Stop being deceptive about it.

By your reasoning, anyone e.g. cartel hitmen, IDF killers, etc. can say they were misled into doing something immoral and you’d have to excuse them.

If, they were indeed misled, then yes, I would consider that a mitigating circumstance.

Apparently the point escapes you. How do you know? Who appointed you general arbiter of who’s “misled” and who isn’t? Anyone can claim they were “misled” about anything and who are you to say otherwise? Can you cite any legal cases in the U.S. where someone who killed someone else was acquitted of any wrongdoing because they were presumably “misled” into making a bad decision because of propaganda?

Do you remember the case of the murder of Balbir Singh Sodhi by Frank Roque? Mr. Sodhi was murdered by Roque in the aftermath of 9/11 apparently because he had a beard and wore a turban. Mr. Roque claimed “I’m a patriot. I stand for America all the way,” yet instead of being acquitted because of the influence of “propaganda,” he was convicted of first degree murder and sentenced to life in prison.

Mr. Sodhi was a 49 year old Sikh American man, who owned a Chevron gas station in Mesa, Arizona. He was shot while arranging American flags in front of his gas station. His assailant, Frank Roque, wanted to ‘kill a Muslim’ in retaliation for the terrorist attacks. He selected Mr. Sodhi simply because he had a beard and wore a turban in accordance with his Sikh faith. Mr. Roque shot at Mr. Sodhi three times, then shot at another service station owned by a Lebanese American, and finally shot at a home of a family of Afghan descent. Fortunately, no one else was injured.

[…]

Frank Roque boasted during his arrest: “I’m a patriot.� “I stand for America all the way.� “Two years later, he learned the American way included a fair trial by jury. On September 30, 2003, an Arizona jury found Frank Roque guilty of first-degree murder for his hate crime murder of Mr. Sodhi, along with five other charges, including attempted murder and reckless endangerment related to drive-by shootings at other individuals he perceived to be Middle Eastern that same day in 2001.

https://saldef.org/balbir-singh-sodhi/

By your “reasoning” Roque should’ve been acquitted, right?

If an IDF soldier slapped his girlfriend, because his trusted buddy said she cheated on him, then in that context, I’d tend to be more forgiving. And would hold the lying scumbag responsible. However, in the current context of Gaza, I figure they’re all guilty.

How many people were murdered so far in Gaza, maybe 200,000 or so? According to a study published in The Lancet, that would be less that 1/3 the amount of Iraqis estimated to have died as a result of the 2003 war.

https://web.archive.org/web/20150907130701/http://brusselstribunal.org/pdf/lancet111006.pdf

So according to you, if IDF troops are told by their religious and/or political authorities that they’re “exceptional” and that Palestinians need to die en masse for some alleged offense, you’d find them guilty, but if U.S. troops are told by their authorities that they’re exceptional and that Iraqis need to be attacked and killed for some alleged offense, they’re not guilty?

On the contrary, no. If “(the IDF) are all guilty” of murder then so were all the U.S. troops that invaded Iraq in 2003, whether you happen to like it or not.

And that’s all the time I have for your hapless, tiresome bullshit at the moment.

A German reporter interviewed a teen Afghan Mujahideen during our ill-fated
War against an imaginary enemy and got a similar answer,
“because they are here.”

The kid had never heard of 9-11.

I believe that ‘I’m fighting because you’re here’ is actually the correct quote, now that I think about it.

The parochial nature of your Yeshiva, Kike-centric education is exposed by your confusion of disassemble (take apart) with dissemble ( lie ).
Notice that your dissembling has been completely disassembled.

Lying is the task of fools, and a burden to the grave.
Return those ill-begotten Shekels to the mighty
Hasbara Kahuna, pray for forgiveness and
work on the stealth aspect of your deceit.

Hi Rurik,

Yeah, I’m torn between agreeing and disagreeing with you. You make excellent and very valid arguments as usual of course.

But having thought about your points all week, I’m thinking that we are probably just referring to the different groups of people.

Ok, so on one hand I think your arguments refer to more long-term perceptions by the public, which really are difficult to see, for people not in the news-business, as it were. It’s also a bit of the boiling frog effect, that the narrative distortions have, in the past progressed slowly enough to be relatively imperceptible.

And it’s not just the house painter and secretary who may not see the perpetrated fraud. Our host here, Ron, self-admittedly, spent decades not seeing through the smoke and mirrors either.

Funnily enough, the house painter and secretary are much more likely to eventually see through the propaganda than their physician.

Though Ron obviously doesn’t fall into this category, most ‘intellectuals’ don’t see the propaganda because they have lots of intellectual prestige on the line. That’s the vanity which you were pointing out in your comment.

Their self-assessed prestige, which is constantly being stroked by the propaganda organs telling them how clever and brave they are for not falling for ‘conspiracy theories;’ just as they are being fed ‘conspiracy theories’ by the bucket as it were.

So, as far as I’m concerned, I think your arguments refer to and hold for everyone in society to some extent, assuming relatively slow propaganda cycle, as we all experienced until let’s say around 2016. Leaving out 911 of course, the Kennedys, the Liberty, etc, all relatively well spaced in time.

But since 2016, with Russia-gate, with the propaganda organs going full-kilter, with Covid, BLM, Ukraine, all the wars culminating in this grotesque display of Israeli criminal barbarity, it makes those holding on to the insane narrative roller coaster the biggest conspiracy theorists in the world.

And it’s these liberal, college education morons who have now become fanatical adherents of the wildest conspiracy theory ever: namely that the narrative is consistent.

Now some of them may have reached the point of being afraid to step off the speeding carousel for fear of not understanding anything anymore and of having to look for answers among the very conspiracy theorists they always loathed and felt infinitely superior over.

These intellectual morons were the moral shipwrecks and cowards I was referring to, the people who realize that in 2014 they were ready to destroy Syria because of the three year old boy who drowned on the beach and because Asad was using “barel-bombs� “against his own people� who now choose actively to suppress their clear memories of that and pretend that Israel has a “right� to “defend itself� even as it is crystal clear that their genocidal mass-murder has nothing whatsoever to do with defense and everything to do with barbaric pretend-revenge to mask stealing land.

It’s these scumbags my ire was aimed at.

‘There is a big difference between defending home and hearth, from aggressive invasion, vs. deluded fools shouting USA! USA! for a regime that hates their guts, and seeks their destruction.’

The thing is, the distinction can become a matter of opinion. Hitler framed his invasion of Poland as a matter of defending ethnic Germans — but that wasn’t exactly the whole story. LeClerc’s rather moving ‘Oath of Kufra’ where he had his little band of French renegades in the middle of the Sahara swear to fight until ‘our flag, our beautiful flag floats over Strasbourg Cathedral’ suffers from the minor flaw that Strasburg could reasonably be considered a German city.

‘…There is a big difference between defending home and hearth, from aggressive invasion, vs. deluded fools shouting USA! USA! for a regime that hates their guts, and seeks their destruction…’

Shelby Foote quotes an ordinary Southern soldier who was taken prisoner. He was asked by his Union captors why he was fighting, anyway.

‘I’m fighting because you’re down here.’

‘Volga Germans

if it wasn’t their historical lands, and if they were unwelcome there, they should have went home.’

I don’t think you’ll find it easy to draw the line. The Volga Germans were settled there in the Eighteenth Century, I believe. Invited by Catharine the Great. (had to check that — yep)

Germans all over the place. Mennonites in Paraguay, for example.

Where would it have stopped? So Germany gets the Sudeten Germans — fair enough. But then there are the ethnic Germans in the 1918 version of Poland; after all, none of those areas were actually majority German.

Alsace is pretty German. Germans had been in Transylvania since the Thirteenth Century. Danube Swabians. Germans in the Banat. Bessarabian Germans…

The South Tyrol! It goes on and on.

It’s a problem. All too often, ethnicities tend to be scattered around rather haphazardly. ‘Greeks’ and ‘Turks’ — Ataturk was born in Salonika. Muslims and Hindus in India. Chinese and Malays in Malaysia. How many flavors of this and that in Syria? Shall we discuss Iran? Ethiopia?

Until a Stalin comes along and tidies it all up…but incidentally, Hitler was doing the same thing: massive deportations of perfectly indigenous Poles from Western Poland.

The notion that particular ethnicities are — or even should be — clumped in contiguous territories that ‘belong’ to them is actually a modern conceit. People often hadn’t nicely sorted themselves.

We have relatively fortunate nations where the state evolved along with the formation of a national identity. Spain, France, England, ourselves…so those who have come to think of themselves as ‘French’ are overwhelmingly in France.

That’s nice. But for most, it just hasn’t been that way. Germans got themselves into all kinds of non-contiguous places long before there was a Germany, and it’s obviously completely unreasonable to say that all such places should be incorporated into a unified Germany

their patriotism.

Patriotism isn’t a vice, in and of itself, I would think.

We’re all tribal beings, and it’s normal and healthy to support your own tribe/family.

It’s when it’s misplaced, that it becomes a folly, I would say.

the Zelinsky regime is using a healthy sense of patriotism to stampede the Ukrainian men into the meat grinder. They think they’re defending their homeland, but they’re not, they’re dying in service to their worst enemy. But simply resisting an invasion of your nation, in and of itself, is a virtue. One the people of the West would do well to muster.

Without any patriotism, (love of one’s own people and homeland), then why object when tens or hundreds of millions of foreigners come marching in and claiming the lands for themselves?

There is a big difference between defending home and hearth, from aggressive invasion, vs. deluded fools shouting USA! USA! for a regime that hates their guts, and seeks their destruction.

at least, IMHO

But sitting here in my office, I’m not going to pass judgement on every American soldier who served in Vietnam, even if I do condemn and even damn Johnson and McNamara to the depths of hell, for the things, (treason, war crimes) they did.

Thanks, regarding Pat Tillman and others I have observed the Americans greatest strength is their greatest weakness–their patriotism.

the only case I can recall of Germans ‘burning people alive’, is a story about locking some villagers in a church, or something, and setting it on fire.

Is that what you’re talking about? Did it happen? Did it happen as an aberration, or was it sanctioned by the Nazi High Command?

If they did it, (which would be a terrible blight on them), I doubt it rises to the horrors of Dresden, or Waco *. Which were pure sadism. I’m not sure if the recent case of people being burned alive in Gaza, was deliberate or not, but I wouldn’t be surprised.

(3) Oh, the Germans certainly starved a lot of people. Jews, Poles, even Dutchmen (the ‘Hunger Winter’).

with the deliberate intention of using starvation to kill civilians?

(I’m not a scholar, and so I ask).

Generally, they seem to have regarded them as regrettable necessities.

if there was no other way to get the soldiers manning the machine guns, out of the pillbox, than a flamethrower, then I’d say it seems almost justifiable.

Independent German states and societies have a long track record — and generally, they were at least as good as anyone else.

and generally today, they don’t support wars based on lies. Or, more precisely, the German people don’t. Can’t say that about the elites, as I just wrote to Harold about. The elites of Germany, are not = the German people, any more than the elites of America = the American people.

Now modern Israel is the only completely independent Jewish state that has existed in historical times. That’s what we have to judge Jews by. Here’s what they are, if they really get to strut their stuff.

Well, I would include Bolshevik Russia as an effectively Jewish state. Just as I’d include Perfidious, starting at least as far back as the Boer wars, (for Oppenheimer), in South Africa, as a Jewish state. As indeed, it is today.

In fact, Israel would not, and could not exist without it’s vassal states, (U.S., UK, France, Germany, Belgium, et al..) run by and for Jews. Particularly Perfidious, where the City of London is ground-zero of Rothschild’s rat hole.

The footage I’ve seen shows the German people thoroughly enjoying their victories. Raining flowers on tanks returning from France, ecstatic crowds congratulating the heroes of Crete.

I don’t blame them — but I don’t think they were forced to conquer half of Europe against their will.

I don’t think Germany wanted war with France or England or anyone, really, except to get their lands back, and to neutralize the threat from the Bolsheviks/Soviets. But France and England declared war on Germany, (in obvious fealty to ZOG ; )

Volga Germans

if it wasn’t their historical lands, and if they were unwelcome there, they should have went home.

*having just written a long reply to Harold, I wonder how he feels about the Waco atrocity.

It was done to Americans, but then, I think Harold believes that is the very least that Americans all deserve, for all the things they’re guilty of, going back centuries. So was/is burning them alive, even a crime?

Suppose I told you (without providing any evidence) that your next-door neighbor was actually a monster from outer space who posed an extreme threat and that you should preempt the threat by killing him, accordingly, and you subsequently did kill him; would a jury acquit you of murder because you were ignorant, stupid/intellectually lazy and morally incompetent enough to take my barely asserted claim at face value and kill someone because of it?

wow Harold

‘…We don’t know if the German people were onboard for imperial conquest beyond Germany’s historic borders, where German people still lived. ‘

The footage I’ve seen shows the German people thoroughly enjoying their victories. Raining flowers on tanks returning from France, ecstatic crowds congratulating the heroes of Crete.

I don’t blame them — but I don’t think they were forced to conquer half of Europe against their will.

Also, ‘…where German people still lived…’…

Well, Germans were one of the more migratory peoples of Europe — Jews would top them, but that’s about it. There were Volga Germans, for Chrissake. Obviously, that couldn’t be used to confer title to everything.

Because (1)the German military didn’t sodomize prisoners of war, to the cheers of the German people. Or (2) burn people alive, or (3) starve to death entire populations, or do any of the myriad horrors that (4) Jews seem to revel in.

(1) You seem to be right there.

(2) The Germans did that on occasion.

(3) Oh, the Germans certainly starved a lot of people. Jews, Poles, even Dutchmen (the ‘Hunger Winter’).

(4) This is definitely a difference. The Germans don’t ever seem to have enjoyed committing their atrocities. Generally, they seem to have regarded them as regrettable necessities. Not so the Jews.

I’ll point out something else. Independent German states and societies have a long track record — and generally, they were at least as good as anyone else. Nothing particularly horrific about Nineteenth Century Prussia, for example. It was admirable, in fact. Ditto for Medieval Saxony under the Welfs or whoever, Hapsburg Austria, etc, etc. Pretty respectable, on the whole. So Nazism can be set against the whole range of outcomes. More usually, Germans were…

Now modern Israel is the only completely independent Jewish state that has existed in historical times. That’s what we have to judge Jews by. Here’s what they are, if they really get to strut their stuff.

First, by this reasoning anyone and everyone could be excused/held morally blameless for whatever heinous crimes they commit. Where do you draw the line?

I consider Pat Tillman [RIP] to have been a genuine American hero, even as it turns out, everything he believed was a lie.

As I see it, neither the case of Pat Tillman nor that of Aaron Bushnell answer the question I posed to you nor do they support your implication that the people of the U.S. are somehow generally not responsible for America’s long-standing record of heinous crimes against humanity.

But being that you brought it up, imagine a similar situation in another context. Suppose I told you (without providing any evidence) that your next-door neighbor was actually a monster from outer space who posed an extreme threat and that you should preempt the threat by killing him, accordingly, and you subsequently did kill him; would a jury acquit you of murder because you were ignorant, stupid/intellectually lazy and morally incompetent enough to take my barely asserted claim at face value and kill someone because of it? I think not.

Before voluntarily becoming an instrumentality of death for the U.S. “government” (either his own death or that of someone else at his hands), Pat Tillman had a civic and moral duty to at least do a little research into what he was getting himself into. Apparently he didn’t, and that was solely his fault, IMO.

In any case, Tillman joined the U.S. Army in May 2002 (well into the age of the internet) as a 25 year old college graduate with a 3.85 GPA, who presumably would’ve had at least some meager ability to think and do some moral reasoning for himself. Moreover, his first military assignment was not deployment to Afghanistan but the invasion of Iraq, a country that obviously had nothing whatsoever to do with 9/11, and there’s evidence that Tillman knew it was illegal:

Baer, who served with Tillman for more than a year in Iraq and Afghanistan, told one anecdote that took place during the March 2003 invasion as the Rangers moved up through southern Iraq.

“I can see it like a movie screen,” Baer said. “We were outside of (a city in southern Iraq) watching as bombs were dropping on the town. We were at an old air base, me, Kevin and Pat, we weren’t in the fight right then. We were talking. And Pat said, ‘You know, this war is so f— illegal.’ And we all said, ‘Yeah.’ That’s who he was. He totally was against Bush.”

https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/FAMILY-DEMANDS-THE-TRUTH-New-inquiry-may-expose-2567400.php

So why didn’t he declare conscientious objector status at that point? Why didn’t he go AWOL like Pablo Paredes or Camilo Mejia did rather than kill people in a war he knew was illegal? And why would he believe that the Afghanistan war was somehow legitimate (without any evidence) if the Iraq war wasn’t?

I feel sorry for Pat Tillman but under the circumstances I don’t see how he can be excused for what he did, certainly not as a “hero.”

I also consider Aaron Bushnell [RIP] to have been a genuine American hero, even as it turns out, he figured out all the lies.

I don’t know much about Aaron Bushnell but as I understand it he wasn’t involved in any combat anywhere. Apparently his spectacular suicide was an act of protest against immoral U.S. “government” foreign policy, particularly the unqualified military, economic and political support of Israel’s genocide against the Palestinians.

In any case, I don’t see how your examples undermine anything I said or support anything you said. By your reasoning, anyone e.g. cartel hitmen, IDF killers, etc. can say they were misled into doing something immoral and you’d have to excuse them.

Somewhere in between is the rest of us. So there is no visible line, it’s a gradual awakening. But the good news is, there aren’t too many more Pat Tillmans out there ready to kill or die, based on Zio-lies.

As I see it everyone who works at the Scranton Army ammunition plant, Lockheed-Martin, General Atomics, Raytheon is complicit in mass murder, as is anyone who votes to install a known mass-murderer into a high political office. Where are the mass resignations from the State Dept. and the DOD? Where are the mass resignations from the companies whose hands are drenched in blood?

And while I’m on the subject, where are the mass resignations from United Health Care and the other health insurance companies that are extorting and killing people en masse? Where are the mass resignations from the FDA and the CDC, especially in the aftermath of the Covid-19 scam? Where are the mass resignations from the FBI, CIA and police departments across the U.S. that pursue the self-destructive war on drugs, engage in treacherous SWAT team activities where they do things like shoot up innocent people or throw flash-bang grenades into babies’ cribs, or make a practice of immoral civil asset forfeiture? Where are the mass resignations from the tax claim bureaus and sheriff’s offices that make people homeless because they can’t pay the communistic, confiscatory, utterly unconstitutional tax on residential property?

As I type this America is filled with way too many corrupt/morally incompetent people who don’t give the slightest damn about anything but themselves, and that’s why America is going down.

how much do you know about the Red Terror? How much do you know about the Holodomor? The Soviets sent the Red Army rapists across Europe who raped, (it is said) every female from 8 to 80, and not just Germans, but any European woman or girl they came across.

How much do you know about the role of America’s immoral involvement in WW1 as it relates to fostering the Bolshevik revolution in Russia in the first place? How much do you know about America’s treacherous role in promoting WW2, involving itself directly in the war and preventing an early end to the war?

Anyway, I know enough about the subject matter to know that the USSR’s crimes as bad as they may have been are almost insignificant compared to America’s global crimes over the last 250 years of its history.

I think that just as the Third Reich displayed some of the less appealing aspects of the German national psyche, Israel stands as an indictment of Jews.

If, the German people’s intent was to conquer other people in order to steal their lands, and impose the ‘master race’ upon them, then I would agree with you. But, I can’t verify that was the intent of the Third Reich. I suspect the Third Reich was about allowing German people and territories, ripped from the Fatherland by the treachery at Versailles, to come home, which they did enthusiastically, like in Austria and elsewhere. And also to restore dignity and even greatness back to Germany.

So it all boils down to ‘Was the Third Reich, intent upon imperial conquest of lands that were not historically German? And for the purpose of stealing those lands, rather than a war against ((Global communism)).

Have the scholars settled this question?

Because if I tend to knee-jerk defend the German people of that era, it’s because I don’t know of a time or people who’ve been so energetically demonized and lied-about. Everything I was told about Germany and the World Wars has turned out to be lies. Did I miss something? Is there evidence that the German people wanted to conquer Serbia or Ukraine or Russia, and then ethnically cleanse all the Slavs out, and steal those lands for German ‘living space’? It doesn’t seem to me that German occupation of France led to genocide for the French people. Indeed, it looks to me like Vichy France was a thousand times better than today’s ZOG France, where the French people actually are being genocided.

I know what the Jews and their lackeys have told me about WWII Germany my entire life; lies.

But is there any truth to it?

On a side note, I’ve been to Germany, and I know some Germans. Exemplary people, (most) of them. One thing that I noticed in Germany, is that at a crosswalk, when there were obviously no cars in sight, anywhere. And this is a village, not a city. The Germans would all wait dutifully for the ‘walk’ sign to change. None of them would dare just strolling across the street, (because there obviously were no cars anywhere!). And when they saw the American doing so, they were almost shocked, it seemed to me. They do seem to be a rule-following kind of people. So there’s my anecdote for the day.

Israel stands as an indictment of Jews.

We don’t know if the German people were onboard for imperial conquest beyond Germany’s historic borders, where German people still lived. But we do know Israel seeks conquest of lands that never belonged to them, (religious idiocy notwithstanding), and that they overtly practice murder and terror and ethnic cleansing, and the cruelest kind of genocide, (starvation, privation, indiscriminate bombing, terrorism, etc..). So yea, anyone, Jew or otherwise, who would defend what Israel has done since 1948, and in particular, what it’s doing today..

..must be by definition; utterly amoral, cruel, unjust, and basically a loathsome pig of a human being.

Because the German military didn’t sodomize prisoners of war, to the cheers of the German people. Or burn people alive, or starve to death entire populations, or do any of the myriad horrors that Jews seem to revel in.

If we could end the Fed, and stop these people from being able to print our money, and use it to destroy us, and everyone else, that would be a good thing.

This statement was supposedly covertly recorded in 1990 at Finks Bar in Jerusalem, a well known Mossad hangout. ? Bibi Netanyahu stated

If we get caught they will just replace us with persons of the same cloth. So it does not matter what you do, America is a golden calf and we will suck it dry, chop it up, and sell it off piece by piece until there is nothing left but the world’s biggest welfare state that we will create and control. Why? Because it is the will of God, and America is big enough to take the hit so we can do it again and again and again. This is what WE do to countries that We hate. We destroy them very slowly and make them suffer for refusing to be our slaves.

This is what WE do to countries that WE hate ….. So who is WE?

The implication is that this destroying of countries has been done before, as per The Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion. Such countries would be Germany, Russia, taking over the Bank of England and The City of London, to a certain extent China during the opium wars, ( and asking who really controls the Financial markets of China ? )

?? So the WE are those who carry out the instructions in the Protocols?

Can Netanyahu’s lineage be traced back to the temple destroyed in 70AD and the Jewish officials that Jesus called the synagog of Satan, “who say they are Jews and are not”. In the Dead Sea Scrolls??? Called “the lot of Belial”.

Again see Albert Pikes Plan for 3 World Wars. It is not just about Greater Israel, but also about total world control?

Thanks.

I didn’t know of that asshole’s support for bombing and horrors of Gaza

and tragically, it seems his house survived.

But even had it burned down, the loss and sorrow can’t come close to the anguish and outrage, of when your house is destroyed deliberately.

The timing of these catastrophic wildfires was strategic

The fake Jews needed a big distraction right now because of their up-coming capitulation to the resistance’s demands in Gaza

Meaning defeat for the invincible Israeli army

So they started this fire

The proof is in the pudding

The Jewish Press is only talking about the LA fires and sweeping Israel’s defeat under the rug.

I keep wishing and hoping to find the elusive holy grail, the big mistake these bastards will make that will finally get their sorry asses nailed to the wall.

that’s why the main issue I harp on, is 9/11

They did it, and Building 7 is the smoking gun. If the American people understood this, not only would support for Israel dry up, but it could be, that finally, the righteous wrath of the American people could be directed at its actual enemy, for once.

It’s so frustrating to live through an ongoing genocide of innocent human beings and not be able to make it stop!

I admit, I read of the tales of Rwanda and Darfur, and I just kind of sighed, with a resignation of savages being savages. Like the horrors in Haiti today. America had nothing to do with these things.

But with Gaza, that’s on us. Our government, our clergy, our institutions at the UN and our dollars and weapons are being used on those defenseless people, including endless thousands of women and children.

It’s an unholy sin, and an enormity that has stained the character of America in very dire ways. Brain Mast was reelected. The people who voted for him, are a disgrace, and I am loath to call them fellow Americans. Ditto the horrors in Syria, because it was America that set that conflict in action, in service to, (as usual) Israel and Jewish supremacism.

For how long will America continue to lick the gnarled hand of this fiend, as America is fast going over the cliff.

How many ship-loads of American blood must be spilled, how many trillions of dollars down this rat hole of endless wars for Israel?!

Even Europe is demanding more escalation with Russia, obviously in service to ZOG, who also demands that Europe commit suicide.

‘You will allow homosexuals to be ordained Catholic priests. You will celebrate deviant perverts as role models for your children, you allow your ancestors and heritage to be demonized, and the scum from the streets to be heralded as heroes, with statues of St. Floyd to replace all the evil white (redundant) men like your Founders.

And the American people obey, and crawl, in homage to their most depraved and intractable enemy.

It’s really quite a sight to see, eh?

God bless Dutch, and God speed in your efforts.

My suspicion is that Hamas overperformed. They were supposed to manage to kill four or five; not seize kibbutzes, overrrun a military command center, kill hundreds, etc.

after the deliberate provocations, and the warnings of an imminent attack, for the IDF to have stood down for, (I’ve read) seven hours, as Hamas killed IDF soldiers and collected hundreds of hostages…

.. seems to me a stretch. But then perhaps the IDF really is that incompetent or cowardly or a combination of the two. I don’t know. They weren’t able to sink the defenseless USS Liberty, even with fighter jets and torpedo boats and napalm and thousands of 30mm machine gun bullets.

Anyway, as it’s played out, it certainly hasn’t saved Netanyahu’s arse.

My sense of it, is that had it not been for Oct. 7th, he would be facing corruption charges by now. I think he was on the brink, before the attack.

He’s going to have to engineer another war, or he’s dead.

I could be that, (like the USS Liberty and 9/11), Oct 7th was arranged by Israel ultimately to get America to fight more wars for the Jews. And the scorched earth bombing of Gaza, and the starvation and assorted horrors, are just added benefits for these fiends.

‘beep beep, hahahaha’

Thanks Phil. That’s all I was hoping for. We’ll have to see where it leads. Judge Napolitano seems to be dipping his toes into 911 Truth. Do you think Judging Freedom will examine that issue in the near future? Clayton at Redacted seems to be going there. I’m just wondering…

Reminds me of a drunken gendarme in The Good Soldier Å vejk who opines that wars are a good thing because not only are good people killed “but lots of rogues and bastards too”. (Though rogues and bastards might find ways of avoiding danger – anyway, the gendarme’s perspective on WW1 was an interesting one, to say the least.)

Could most of these fires be arson by the poor and homeless? Most of the owners are absentee landlords anyway. There are so many images of houses and cars burnt down but unscathed trees around. If these fires were spread by wind they you’d expect trees to be burnt down too. There could be forest fires in the general region and then firebugs go around and torch the houses and cars under cover of these forest fires. The rich landlords don’t care anyway, they collect the insurance. Or they may be burning their own houses to collect the insurance payments as times are hard and even the rich could be short of cash.

Thanks Rurik. Very well said! I’ve been at this for quite awhile now and I keep wishing and hoping to find the elusive holy grail, the big mistake these bastards will make that will finally get their sorry asses nailed to the wall. It’s so frustrating to live through an ongoing genocide of innocent human beings and not be able to make it stop!

Anyway, I’ve shared that video with everybody I know and there’s a chance it will be looked at by Whitney Webb and David Icke and Ryan Cristian at Last American Vagabond. I’ve tried on this very thread a couple of times to get Phil Giraldi to look at it but he hasn’t responded. It’s probably too hot of a potato for the folks at Judging Freedom.

GARRRRRRRRR-Bage!!!!!! Houses burned next to intact survivors are common in fires in Austfailia. Fires are fickle-no need for space lasers, either. Simple incendiaries would do the job.

The very worst are the Western MSM presstitute Sabbat Goyim, who, when the internet is full of vids by IDF butchers of their escapades, and when Israeli organs like Haaretz, are replete with details of barbaric savagery, suppress every single report. There must be, in some new world to come, trials for complicity in genocide for these vermin, with NO ‘Statute of Limitations’. Hound the scum to their unquiet graves.

James Wood, the ‘actor’, gloated over the Gaza killings, then his house burned down. There may be a of, after all.

‘…So now, this event saved Bibi’s political arse, and gave Bibi and his cabinet of genocidal psychopaths everything that they wanted, a pretext to do a Dresden on Gaza..’

I’ll point out that this has happened before.

Israel enters a political crisis/they carefully bait the Palestinians/the Palestinians respond/enemy at the gates!

All good Jews stop their kvetching and rush to man the ramparts.

My suspicion is that Hamas overperformed. They were supposed to manage to kill four or five; not seize kibbutzes, overrrun a military command center, kill hundreds, etc.

Anyway, as it’s played out, it certainly hasn’t saved Netanyahu’s arse. He’s going to have to engineer another war, or he’s dead.

No, dropping the bombs was the right thing to do, and I become impatient with those who would argue otherwise. If anything, we should give ourselves a pat on the back for not dropping the third, and for not nuking Kyoto. The bombs made it possible for the Japanese to throw in the towel, to say, ‘look, there’s no fighting this.’ They obviously saved American lives, but they also saved Japanese lives. What would have been criminal would have been to not drop them. That would have just prolonged and worsened the agony.

‘…((Michael Rapaport)) responding to the Israeli terror attack using beepers to kill and maim mostly civilians, including children…’

My. I prefer to stick to what I think is completely defensible. Do Armenian contractors suck? I won’t say — not enough personal experience. Does two and two make four? Definitely.

That said, I think that just as the Third Reich displayed some of the less appealing aspects of the German national psyche, Israel stands as an indictment of Jews.

We have, for the first time in historical experience, a state run entirely and solely by Jews. And what do we get?

They will never be able to condemn anyone else, ever again.

*Any people on the planet, but one.

try to imagine the very worst Nazi ever, acting like this towards his victims

((Michael Rapaport)) responding to the Israeli terror attack using beepers to kill and maim mostly civilians, including children.

https://www.facebook.com/MichaelRapaportOfficial/videos/beep-beep-im-performing-in-san-francisco-this-weekend-friday-saturday-at-cobbs-c/1416110512419568/

that’s a window into the id

Nazis indeed weren’t as bad as Israel, I’ll let you work on whether they were bad at all.

they would have jailed or executed me

I’m the type that never goose steps to any ‘authority’, and as soon a people start acting like they have power over me, my reaction is immediate and instinctive – fuck off.

The only man I can say I’ve ever ‘followed’, was Ron Paul, and not because of the man, but because of his message; individual liberty.

At some level, Ron Paul’s world view, and that of the Nazis, are mutually exclusive, and I’m 100% on the side of Dr. Paul.

I also think they had some pretty evil ideas — ideas that they put into practice.

Well, there was that ‘master race’ talk, if they really did say that shite. That’s pretty evil stuff, but I’m very skeptical of anything they tell us, about what ideas they put into practice.

Yes, they were brutal on the Eastern front, but wasn’t Stalin just as brutal, and even more callous when it came to Russian civilians?

How much more brutal can you get than the Holodomor, and systematically starving to death millions of the world’s best farmers and their families? Perhaps in an existential conflict with such fiends, brutality meets brutality.

I don’t know. You tell us about these ideas they put into practice.

I’m aware, as we all are of the lamp shades and soap, and the ‘gas chambers’ and pulling babies out of the back of lorries, and tossing them onto bonfires, and sewing feet onto arms, and hands onto legs, and so forth, but I doubt those stories.

Did they ever do anything as monstrous, or evil, as Dresden? I’ve read that ((Bela Kun and his girlfriend)) liked to tie Russian POWs to wooden boards, and then burn them alive by the thousands.

Did the Nazis ever do anything like that?

At the end of the day, though, I don’t see how one can simultaneously condemn them and accept Israel. Everything that was unacceptable about them is also true of Israel. That’s the essential point.

I don’t think the Nazis ever gang raped their prisoners, to the cheers of the German people.

But I agree with your point, and the vile, pervasive hypocrisy of our times, to provide funding and ‘moral’ support, for what Israel is doing, is a blight on every government and person doing so, (Brian Mast, et al). And ironically, even as I don’t believe the Nazis were engaged in an overt campaign of genocide for the Jews, and that it is a calumny against the German people that they knowingly were going along with that, the sad and tragic fact is, that today’s German government, is going along with this genocide. But they’re doing so, obviously under occupation by ZOG.

Were it up to the German people, would they be supporting genocide? I don’t think so. I don’t think any people on the planet*, if they knew what was going on, would be OK with the horrors in Gaza.

*Any people on the planet, but one.

Interesting. I did not hear of that. I guess we will see what happens. Hard to blame Netanyahu when you have so many of their leaders and soldiers brazenly documenting their crimes along with the 96% of Jews that APPROVED of their actions. Of course Jews will lie constantly and governments let them get away with it because thwyvwere bought by Jews and our supposed “free press� intended to protect US from liars is controlled by the same Jew liars. 🤪🤪🤪

‘I would go a little further, at this point, and suggest we’re way beyond a stubborn skepticism, and have entered into the realm of ((the media and government)) are our existential enemy. ‘

That does describe the transition.

‘Funny, you should mention that but it did not end well for
Mel Gibson when he was stopped by a Jewish cop and Mel
addressed him as an “oven dodger.â€�’

The worst of it was that this sort of verbal abuse seems to be a pretty standard form of antagonistic discourse among Australians. Had the cop been short, Gibson would have brought that up. The cop was Jewish, so…

I remember thinking at the time that Gibson was just being Australian — for better or worse.

Pat Tillman was betrayed by his teachers and professors who taught him what to think, instead of how to think.

the raison d’etre of public (government) “education”

A stubborn skepticism about the media and government propaganda is the strongest defense against being suckered.

I would go a little further, at this point, and suggest we’re way beyond a stubborn skepticism, and have entered into the realm of ((the media and government)) are our existential enemy. Handing over your children to today’s government schools, is guaranteed to crush their spirit, and destroy their faculties of reason.

Of course, Pat was a brave man and a true patriot, but like millions of others his life was lost for no good reason, and in a cause contrived by evil men, servants of a foreign power.

I would say the same thing about every American man who died in both World Wars, and who died in all the post-9/11 wars as well.

Janissaries all. Killing and dying in slavish service to their enemy. The ultimate humiliation. And, ‘such a deal!’

‘…Sorry, I got stuck on number 1

I’ll try to respond to the other numbers, (in a more succinct way!) later.

Thanks.’

If you want to argue the Nazis indeed weren’t as bad as Israel, I’ll let you work on whether they were bad at all. Personally, while I think there was much to be said for them, I also think they had some pretty evil ideas — ideas that they put into practice.

At the end of the day, though, I don’t see how one can simultaneously condemn them and accept Israel. Everything that was unacceptable about them is also true of Israel. That’s the essential point.

the evidence the Israeli Government showed to the world as proof of the October 7th Hamas attacks.

Thanks Dutch, (I didn’t watch the whole video), but they’re on the right track, I think.

My take on Oct, 7th, is that Bibi was conducting overt provocations at the Al-Aqsa Mosque and elsewhere, leading up to the attack. Then, Israel was warned by Egypt that an attack was coming. Then, it seems like the IDF stood down, when the attack happened. Then, the IDF came in like gang-busters, with Blackhawks and tanks and just blasted everything in sight, killing Israelis and Hamas alike, then they lied about it, saying Hamas had sliced the heads off forty babies and put them in ovens and raped and killed everyone they could get their hands on.. blah, blah, blah..

Bibi said it was Israel’s 9/11, and ironically, that may be more true than people realize.

So now, this event saved Bibi’s political arse, and gave Bibi and his cabinet of genocidal psychopaths everything that they wanted, a pretext to do a Dresden on Gaza.

Did Bibi orchestrate this?

I don’t know.

but as with everything, there is always the cui bono.

However, it could also be that Oct, 7th was an act of historic bravery and heroism from Hamas. Certainly, living under Bibi’s and Israel’s cruelty, must be intolerable. No humans should be subject to that kind of soul-crushing humiliation and torment, generation after generation. Their children murdered in the streets, or put in dungeons for years and subjected to torture.

It is a blight on humanity that it has gone on, and continues to go on, without a global outrage.

It’s particularly a blight on the wealthy Arab and Muslim regimes who were on the verge of making nice with Bibi and his genocidal goons, until Oct, 7th, put the kibosh on such infamy.

So there is good reason to see Oct, 7th as the last straw of a heroic and victimized people rising up with the best of the human spirit, to say ‘enough!

And even if they knew many civilians would suffer, perhaps the feelings of the Palestinians is that ‘we will endure it, for the sake of our as yet unborn children, so that someday, they can know peace and justice.

And that’s where were at. Hamas and the Palestinians showed and are showing the world what heroics really is, in the face of genocidal tyranny and Bibi’s sadism and a corrupt world’s indifference.

If the Israelis are using AI to create videos that will try to demonize Hamas, I would be shocked if they weren’t.

In defense of the original Nazis, I can offer the following:

1. A cause more closely related to reality. Not actually just, or right, but…

what exactly was that cause?

under the More

Why would you need an “Iron Dome” to stop wildfires?

Unless the fires were being started by a laser carrying drone?

If that is the case, then it would explain how seemingly random buildings were destroyed next to unburned structures.

This is more evidence that these fires along with the Lahaina and Northern California fires were started by lasers from drones rather than downed powerlines.

They tend to be well-protected by the police. I have never seen anyone react to them and this may be wise, as the intention seems to be to provoke a reaction. The last march I was on, on November 30, the pro-Palestine procession had to pass between a small number of people with Israeli flags on the left, and another small group to my right who mostly seemed to be Iranian exile royalists. I was closer to the latter group and there was a uniformed cop with them operating a film camera – I peered into its lens in fact. Irritating, but if anyone reacted to them it would be trumpeted as terrorists attacking noble ordinary members of the public, you would be arrested by the police and there might even be film used against you in evidence in court.

What makes you believe that to be true?

No disassembly required. You demonstrate that you’re a lying troll who can’t prove your claims or refute what you deny.

What would be your purpose for doing that, besides trying to paint me as what you are?

Sounds like lying Kol Nidre boy behaviour to me.

Yes, I’m pleased with the optics.

Pat Tillman was betrayed by his teachers and professors who taught him
what to think, instead of how to think. A stubborn skepticism about the
media and government propaganda is the strongest defense
against being suckered.

Of course, Pat was a brave man and a true patriot, but like millions of
others his life was lost for no good reason, and in a cause contrived
by evil men, servants of a foreign power.

Funny, you should mention that but it did not end well for
Mel Gibson when he was stopped by a Jewish cop and Mel
addressed him as an “oven dodger.”

Mel was forced to eat poisoned matzah, kiss a disgusting
array of Rabbinic ass and he struggled to obtain funding
for his movie projects.

Hi Phil. I was wondering if you had any comment in regards to my post #88.

Hi Rurik. I was wondering if you have seen this video from Max Igan regarding AI generated fake videos of the evidence the Israeli Government showed to the world as proof of the October 7th Hamas attacks.

Video Link

In my opinion, it is Building 7 level smoking gun evidence that October 7th was a major false flag operation showing premeditation on the part of the Israeli Government and blatant mainstream media complicity in spreading the propaganda that instigated and perpetuated the Genocide. I respect your opinion and would love to hear what you have to say about this. Thanks!