');
The Unz Review •ï¿½An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library •ï¿½B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


�Remember My InformationWhy?
�Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Alastair Crooke Anatoly Karlin Andrew Anglin Andrew Joyce Audacious Epigone Boyd D. Cathey C.J. Hopkins E. Michael Jones Eric Margolis Eric Striker Fred Reed Gilad Atzmon Godfree Roberts Gregory Hood Guillaume Durocher Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir James Kirkpatrick James Thompson Jared Taylor John Derbyshire Jonathan Cook Jung-Freud Karlin Community Kevin Barrett Kevin MacDonald Lance Welton Larry Romanoff Laurent Guyénot Linh Dinh Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Kersey Pepe Escobar Peter Frost Philip Giraldi Razib Khan Ron Unz Steve Sailer The Saker Tobias Langdon Trevor Lynch A. Graham A. J. Smuskiewicz A Southerner Academic Research Group UK Staff Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Agha Hussain Ahmad Al Khaled Ahmet Öncü Alain De Benoist Alan Macleod Albemarle Man Alex Graham Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alexander Jacob Alexander Wolfheze Alfred McCoy Alison Weir Allan Wall Allegra Harpootlian Amalric De Droevig Ambrose Kane Amr Abozeid Anand Gopal Anastasia Katz Andre Damon Andre Vltchek Andreas Canetti Andrei Martyanov Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andrew Hamilton Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Napolitano Andrew S. Fischer Andy Kroll Angie Saxon Ann Jones Anna Tolstoyevskaya Anne Wilson Smith Anonymous Anonymous American Anonymous Attorney Anonymous Occidental Anthony Boehm Anthony Bryan Anthony DiMaggio Tony Hall Antiwar Staff Antonius Aquinas Antony C. Black Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor AudaciousEpigone Augustin Goland Austen Layard Ava Muhammad Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Kissin Barry Lando Barton Cockey Beau Albrecht Belle Chesler Ben Fountain Ben Freeman Ben Sullivan Benjamin Villaroel Bernard M. Smith Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Blake Archer Williams Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Book Brad Griffin Bradley Moore Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brett Wilkins Brian Dew Brian McGlinchey Brian R. Wright Brittany Smith C.D. Corax Cara Marianna Carl Boggs Carl Horowitz Carolyn Yeager Cat McGuire Catherine Crump César Keller Chalmers Johnson Chanda Chisala Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlie O'Neill Charlottesville Survivor Chase Madar Chauke Stephan Filho Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Chris Woltermann Christian Appy Christophe Dolbeau Christopher DeGroot Christopher Donovan Christopher Ketcham Chuck Spinney Civus Non Nequissimus CODOH Editors Coleen Rowley Colin Liddell Cooper Sterling Craig Murray Cynthia Chung D.F. Mulder Dahr Jamail Dakota Witness Dan E. Phillips Dan Sanchez Daniel Barge Daniel McAdams Daniel Vinyard Danny Sjursen Dave Chambers Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Boyajian David Bromwich David Chibo David Chu David Gordon David Haggith David Irving David L. McNaron David Lorimer David Martin David North David Stockman David Vine David Walsh David William Pear David Yorkshire Dean Baker Declan Hayes Dennis Dale Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Diego Ramos Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Dmitriy Kalyagin Donald Thoresen Alan Sabrosky Dr. Ejaz Akram Dr. Ridgely Abdul Mu’min Muhammad Dries Van Langenhove Eamonn Fingleton Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Edward Curtin Edward Dutton Egbert Dijkstra Egor Kholmogorov Ekaterina Blinova Ellen Brown Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Emil Kirkegaard Emilio García Gómez Emma Goldman Enzo Porter Eric Draitser Eric Paulson Eric Peters Eric Rasmusen Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Gant Eugene Girin Eugene Kusmiak Eve Mykytyn F. Roger Devlin Fadi Abu Shammalah Fantine Gardinier Federale Fenster Fergus Hodgson Finian Cunningham The First Millennium Revisionist Fordham T. Smith Former Agent Forum Francis Goumain Frank Tipler Franklin Lamb Franklin Stahl Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Gary Corseri Gary Heavin Gary North Gary Younge Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Galloway George Koo George Mackenzie George Szamuely Georgianne Nienaber Gilbert Cavanaugh Gilbert Doctorow Giles Corey Glen K. Allen Glenn Greenwald A. Beaujean Agnostic Alex B. Amnestic Arcane Asher Bb Bbartlog Ben G Birch Barlow Canton ChairmanK Chrisg Coffee Mug Darth Quixote David David B David Boxenhorn DavidB Diana Dkane DMI Dobeln Duende Dylan Ericlien Fly Gcochran Godless Grady Herrick Jake & Kara Jason Collins Jason Malloy Jason�s Jeet Jemima Joel John Emerson John Quiggin JP Kele Kjmtchl Mark Martin Matoko Kusanagi Matt Matt McIntosh Michael Vassar Miko Ml Ole P-ter Piccolino Rosko Schizmatic Scorpius Suman TangoMan The Theresa Thorfinn Thrasymachus Wintz Gonzalo Lira Graham Seibert Grant M. Dahl Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Greg Klein Gregg Stanley Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Conte Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Gunnar Alfredsson Gustavo Arellano Hank Johnson Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Hans Vogel Harri Honkanen Heiner Rindermann Henry Cockburn Hewitt E. Moore Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Howe Abbot-Hiss Hubert Collins Hugh Kennedy Hugh McInnish Hugh Moriarty Hugo Dionísio Hunter DeRensis Hunter Wallace Huntley Haverstock Ian Fantom Igor Shafarevich Ira Chernus Ivan Kesić J. Alfred Powell J.B. Clark J.D. Gore J. Ricardo Martins Jacek Szela Jack Antonio Jack Dalton Jack Kerwick Jack Krak Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen Jake Bowyer James Bovard James Carroll James Carson Harrington James Chang James Dunphy James Durso James Edwards James Fulford James Gillespie James Hanna James J. O'Meara James K. Galbraith James Karlsson James Lawrence James Petras Jane Lazarre Jane Weir Janice Kortkamp Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Cannon Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jayant Bhandari JayMan Jean Bricmont Jean Marois Jean Ranc Jef Costello Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey D. Sachs Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jesse Mossman JHR Writers Jim Daniel Jim Fetzer Jim Goad Jim Kavanagh Jim Smith JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Dackman Joe Lauria Joel S. Hirschhorn Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Harrison Sims John Helmer John Hill John Huss John J. Mearsheimer John Jackson John Kiriakou John Macdonald John Morgan John Patterson John Leonard John Pilger John Q. Publius John Rand John Reid John Ryan John Scales Avery John Siman John Stauber John T. Kelly John Taylor John Titus John Tremain John V. Walsh John Wear John Williams Jon Else Jon Entine Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Revusky Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Sawyer Jonathan Schell Jordan Henderson Jordan Steiner Joseph Kay Joseph Kishore Joseph Sobran Josephus Tiberius Josh Neal Jeshurun Tsarfat Juan Cole Judith Coburn Julian Bradford Julian Macfarlane K.J. Noh Kacey Gunther Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Karl Haemers Karl Nemmersdorf Karl Thorburn Kees Van Der Pijl Keith Woods Kelley Vlahos Kenn Gividen Kenneth Vinther Kerry Bolton Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin Michael Grace Kevin Rothrock Kevin Sullivan Kevin Zeese Kshama Sawant Larry C. Johnson Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Lawrence Erickson Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Leonard C. Goodman Leonard R. Jaffee Liam Cosgrove Lidia Misnik Lilith Powell Linda Preston Lipton Matthews Liv Heide Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett Louis Farrakhan Lydia Brimelow M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maciej Pieczyński Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marco De Wit Marcus Alethia Marcus Apostate Marcus Cicero Marcus Devonshire Margaret Flowers Margot Metroland Marian Evans Mark Allen Mark Bratchikov-Pogrebisskiy Mark Crispin Miller Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Gullick Mark H. Gaffney Mark Lu Mark Perry Mark Weber Marshall Yeats Martin Jay Martin K. O'Toole Martin Webster Martin Witkerk Mary Phagan-Kean Matt Cockerill Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Caldwell Matthew Ehret Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max Jones Max North Max Parry Max West Maya Schenwar Merlin Miller Metallicman Michael A. Roberts Michael Averko Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Hoffman Michael Masterson Michael Quinn Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Michelle Malkin Miko Peled Mnar Muhawesh Moon Landing Skeptic Morgan Jones Morris V. De Camp Mr. Anti-Humbug Muhammed Abu Murray Polner N. Joseph Potts Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Nathan Cofnas Nathan Doyle Ned Stark Neil Kumar Nelson Rosit Nicholas R. Jeelvy Nicholas Stix Nick Griffin Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Nicolás Palacios Navarro Nils Van Der Vegte Noam Chomsky NOI Research Group Nomi Prins Norman Finkelstein Norman Solomon OldMicrobiologist Oliver Boyd-Barrett Oliver Williams Oscar Grau P.J. Collins Pádraic O'Bannon Patrice Greanville Patrick Armstrong Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Patrick Lawrence Patrick Martin Patrick McDermott Patrick Whittle Paul Bennett Paul Cochrane Paul De Rooij Paul Edwards Paul Engler Paul Gottfried Paul Larudee Paul Mitchell Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Paul Souvestre Paul Tripp Pedro De Alvarado Peter Baggins Ph.D. Peter Bradley Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Lee Peter Van Buren Philip Kraske Philip Weiss Pierre M. Sprey Pierre Simon Povl H. Riis-Knudsen Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Qasem Soleimani Rachel Marsden Raches Radhika Desai Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ralph Raico Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Ramzy Baroud Randy Shields Raul Diego Ray McGovern Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Reginald De Chantillon Rémi Tremblay Rev. Matthew Littlefield Ricardo Duchesne Richard Cook Richard Falk Richard Foley Richard Galustian Richard Houck Richard Hugus Richard Knight Richard Krushnic Richard McCulloch Richard Silverstein Richard Solomon Rick Shenkman Rick Sterling Rita Rozhkova Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Debrus Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Fisk Robert Hampton Robert Henderson Robert Inlakesh Robert LaFlamme Robert Lindsay Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Stark Robert Stevens Robert Trivers Robert Wallace Robert Weissberg Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Rolo Slavskiy Romana Rubeo Romanized Visigoth Ron Paul Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning RT Staff Ruuben Kaalep Ryan Andrews Ryan Dawson Sabri Öncü Salim Mansur Sam Dickson Sam Francis Sam Husseini Sayed Hasan Scot Olmstead Scott Howard Scott Ritter Servando Gonzalez Sharmine Narwani Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Sidney James Sietze Bosman Sigurd Kristensen Sinclair Jenkins Southfront Editor Spencer Davenport Spencer J. Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen F. Cohen Stephen J. Rossi Stephen J. Sniegoski Stephen Paul Foster Sterling Anderson Steve Fraser Steve Keen Steve Penfield Steven Farron Steven Yates Subhankar Banerjee Susan Southard Sydney Schanberg Talia Mullin Tanya Golash-Boza Taxi Taylor McClain Taylor Young Ted O'Keefe Ted Rall The Crew The Zman Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas A. Fudge Thomas Anderson Thomas Hales Thomas Dalton Thomas Ertl Thomas Frank Thomas Hales Thomas Jackson Thomas O. Meehan Thomas Steuben Thomas Zaja Thorsten J. Pattberg Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Timothy Vorgenss Timur Fomenko Tingba Muhammad Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Engelhardt Tom Mysiewicz Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Torin Murphy Tracy Rosenberg Travis LeBlanc Vernon Thorpe Virginia Dare Vito Klein Vladimir Brovkin Vladimir Putin Vladislav Krasnov Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walt King Walter E. Block Warren Balogh Washington Watcher Washington Watcher II Wayne Allensworth Wei Ling Chua Wesley Muhammad White Man Faculty Whitney Webb Wilhelm Kriessmann Wilhem Ivorsson Will Jones Will Offensicht William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Wyatt Peterson Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen Yaroslav Podvolotskiy Yvonne Lorenzo Zhores Medvedev
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2020 Election Academia American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Benjamin Netanyahu Black Crime Black Lives Matter Blacks Britain Censorship China China/America Conspiracy Theories Covid Culture/Society Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy Gaza Hamas History Holocaust Ideology Immigration IQ Iran Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Joe Biden NATO Nazi Germany Neocons Open Thread Political Correctness Race/Ethnicity Russia Science Syria Ukraine Vladimir Putin World War II 汪精衛 100% Jussie-free Content 1984 2008 Election 2012 Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2022 Election 2024 Election 23andMe 9/11 9/11 Commission Report Abortion Abraham Lincoln Abu Mehdi Muhandas Achievement Gap ACLU Acting White Adam Schiff Addiction ADL Admin Administration Admixture Adolf Hitler Advertising AfD Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Age Age Of Malthusian Industrialism Agriculture AI AIPAC Air Force Aircraft Carriers Airlines Airports Al Jazeera Al Qaeda Al-Shifa Alain Soral Alan Clemmons Alan Dershowitz Albania Albert Einstein Albion's Seed Alcoholism Alejandro Mayorkas Alex Jones Alexander Dugin Alexander Vindman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Alexei Navalny Algeria Ali Dawabsheh Alien And Sedition Acts Alison Nathan Alt Right Altruism Amazon Amazon.com America America First American Civil War American Dream American History American Indians American Israel Public Affairs Committee American Jews American Left American Nations American Nations American Presidents American Prisons American Renaissance Amerindians Amish Amnesty Amnesty International Amos Hochstein Amy Klobuchar Amygdala Anarchism Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Greece Ancient Rome Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Bacevich Andrew Sullivan Andrew Yang Anglo-America Anglo-imperialism Anglo-Saxons Anglos Anglosphere Angola Animal IQ Animal Rights Wackos Animals Ann Coulter Anne Frank Anthony Blinken Anthony Fauci Anthrax Anthropology Anti-Defamation League Anti-Gentilism Anti-Semites Anti-Vaccination Anti-Vaxx Anti-white Animus Antifa Antifeminism Antiracism Antisemitism Antisemitism Awareness Act Antisocial Behavior Antizionism Antony Blinken Apartheid Apartheid Israel Apollo's Ascent Appalachia Apple Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaeogenetics Archaeology Archaic DNA Architecture Arctic Arctic Sea Ice Melting Argentina Ariel Sharon Armageddon War Armenia Armenian Genocide Army Arnold Schwarzenegger Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Jensen Arthur Lichte Artificial Intelligence Arts/Letters Aryans Aryeh Lightstone Ash Carter Ashkenazi Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians Assassination Assassinations Assimilation Atheism Atlanta AUMF Auschwitz Australia Australian Aboriginals Autism Automation Avril Haines Ayn Rand Azerbaijan Azov Brigade Babes And Hunks Baby Gap Balfour Declaration Balkans Balochistan Baltics Baltimore Riots Banjamin Netanyahu Banking Industry Banking System Banks #BanTheADL Barack Obama Baseball Statistics Bashar Al-Assad Basketball #BasketOfDeplorables BBC BDS BDS Movement Beauty Beethoven Behavior Genetics Behavioral Genetics Bela Belarus Belgium Belgrade Embassy Bombing Ben Cardin Ben Hodges Ben Rhodes Ben Shapiro Ben Stiller Benny Gantz Bernard Henri-Levy Bernie Sanders Betsy DeVos Betty McCollum Bezalel Smotrich Bezalel Yoel Smotrich Biden BigPost Bilateral Relations Bilingual Education Bill Clinton Bill De Blasio Bill Gates Bill Kristol Bill Maher Bill Of Rights Billionaires Billy Graham Bioethics Biology Bioweapons Birmingham Birth Rate Bitcoin Black Community Black History Month Black Muslims Black Panthers Black People Black Slavery BlackLivesMatter BlackRock Blake Masters Blank Slatism BLM Blog Blogging Blogosphere Blond Hair Blood Libel Blue Eyes Boasian Anthropology Boeing Boers Bolshevik Revolution Bolshevik Russia Books Boomers Border Wall Boris Johnson Bosnia Boycott Divest And Sanction Brain Drain Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Bret Stephens Brett McGurk Bretton Woods Brexit Brezhnev Bri Brian Mast BRICs Brighter Brains British Empire British Labour Party British Politics Buddhism Build The Wall Bulldog Bush Business Byzantine Caitlin Johnstone California Californication Camp Of The Saints Canada #Cancel2022WorldCupinQatar Cancer Candace Owens Capitalism Carl Von Clausewitz Carlos Slim Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Cars Carthaginians Catalonia Catholic Church Catholicism Catholics Cats Caucasus CDC Ceasefire Cecil Rhodes Census Central Asia Central Intelligence Agency Chanda Chisala Chaos And Order Charles De Gaulle Charles Manson Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charlie Hebdo Charlottesville Checheniest Chechen Of Them All Chechens Chechnya Chernobyl Chetty Chicago Chicagoization Chicken Hut Child Abuse Children Chile China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese IQ Chinese Language Christian Zionists Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Christopher Wray Chuck Schumer CIA Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil Rights Movement Civil War Civilization Clannishness Clash Of Civilizations Class Classical Antiquity Classical History Classical Music Clayton County Climate Climate Change Clint Eastwood Clintons Coal Coalition Of The Fringes Cognitive Elitism Cognitive Science Cold Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Powell Colin Woodard College Admission College Football Colonialism Color Revolution Columbia University Columbus Comic Books Communism Computers Confederacy Confederate Flag Congress Conquistador-American Conservatism Conservative Movement Conservatives Conspiracy Theory Constantinople Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumerism Controversial Book Convergence Core Article Cornel West Corona Corporatism Corruption COTW Counterpunch Country Music Cousin Marriage Cover Story COVID-19 Craig Murray Creationism Crime Crimea Crispr Critical Race Theory Cruise Missiles Crusades Crying Among The Farmland Cryptocurrency Ctrl-Left Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckery Cuckservatism Cuckservative CUFI Cuisine Cultural Marxism Cultural Revolution Culture Culture War Curfew Czars Czech Republic DACA Daily Data Dump Dallas Shooting Damnatio Memoriae Dan Bilzarian Danny Danon Daren Acemoglu Darwinism Darya Dugina Data Data Analysis Dave Chappelle David Bazelon David Brog David Friedman David Frum David Irving David Lynch David Petraeus Davide Piffer Davos Death Of The West Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Deborah Lipstadt Debt Debt Jubilee Decadence Deep State Deficits Degeneracy Democracy Democratic Party Demograhics Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denmark Dennis Ross Department Of Homeland Security Deplatforming Derek Chauvin Detroit Development Dick Cheney Diet Digital Yuan Dinesh D'Souza Discrimination Disease Disinformation Disney Disparate Impact Dissent Dissidence Diversity Diversity Before Diversity Diversity Pokemon Points Divorce DNA Dogs Dollar Domestic Surveillance Domestic Terrorism Doomsday Clock Dostoevsky Doug Emhoff Doug Feith Dresden Drone War Drones Drug Laws Drugs Duterte Dysgenic Dystopia E. Michael Jones E. O. Wilson East Asia East Asian Exception East Asians East Turkestan Eastern Europe Ebrahim Raisi Economic Development Economic History Economic Sanctions Economy Ecuador Edmund Burke Edmund Burke Foundation Education Edward Snowden Effective Altruism Effortpost Efraim Zurofff Egor Kholmogorov Egypt Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2020 Election Fraud Elections Electric Cars Eli Rosenbaum Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elise Stefanik Elites Elizabeth Holmes Elizabeth Warren Elliot Abrams Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emmanuel Macron Emmett Till Employment Energy England Entertainment Environment Environmentalism Epidemiology Equality Erdogan Eretz Israel Eric Zemmour Ernest Hemingway Espionage Espionage Act Estonia Ethics Ethics And Morals Ethiopia Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity Ethnocentricty EU Eugene Debs Eugenics Eurabia Eurasia Euro Europe European Genetics European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Genetics Evolutionary Psychology Existential Risks Eye Color Face Shape Facebook Faces Fake News False Flag Attack Family Family Systems Fantasy FARA Farmers Fascism Fast Food FBI FDA FDD Federal Reserve Feminism Ferguson Ferguson Shooting Fermi Paradox Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates FIFA Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Finland Finn Baiting Finns First Amendment FISA Fitness Flash Mobs Flight From White Floyd Riots 2020 Fluctuarius Argenteus Flynn Effect Food Football For Fun Forecasts Foreign Agents Registration Act Foreign Policy Fourth Amendment Fox News France Francesca Albanese Frank Salter Frankfurt School Franklin D. Roosevelt Franz Boas Fraud Freakonomics Fred Kagan Free Market Free Speech Free Trade Freedom Of Speech Freedom French Revolution Friedrich Karl Berger Friends Of The Israel Defense Forces Frivolty Frontlash Furkan Dogan Future Futurism G20 Gambling Game Game Of Thrones Gavin McInnes Gavin Newsom Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians GDP Gen Z Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Equality Gender Reassignment Gene-Culture Coevolution Genealogy General Intelligence General Motors Generation Z Generational Gap Genes Genetic Diversity Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Genghis Khan Genocide Genocide Convention Genomics Gentrification Geography Geopolitics George Floyd George Galloway George Patton George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush Georgia Germans Germany Ghislaine Maxwell Gilad Atzmon Gina Peddy Giorgia Meloni Gladwell Glenn Greenwald Global Warming Globalism Globalization Globo-Homo God Gold Golf Gonzalo Lira Google Government Government Debt Government Overreach Government Spending Government Surveillance Government Waste Goyim Grant Smith Graphs Great Bifurcation Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Powers Great Replacement #GreatWhiteDefendantPrivilege Greece Greeks Greg Cochran Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Greta Thunberg Grooming Group Intelligence Group Selection GSS Guardian Guest Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns Guy Swan GWAS Gypsies H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Haiti Hajnal Line Halloween HammerHate Hannibal Procedure Happening Happiness Harvard Harvard University Harvey Weinstein Hassan Nasrallah Hate Crimes Fraud Hoax Hate Hoaxes Hate Speech Hbd Hbd Chick Health Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Hegira Height Henry Harpending Henry Kissinger Hereditary Heredity Heritability Hezbollah High Speed Rail Hillary Clinton Hindu Caste System Hindus Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanics Historical Genetics History Of Science Hitler HIV/AIDS Hoax Holland Hollywood Holocaust Denial Holocaust Deniers Holy Roman Empire Homelessness Homicide Homicide Rate Homomania Homosexuality Hong Kong Houellebecq Housing Houthis Howard Kohr Huawei Hubbert's Peak Huddled Masses Huey Newton Hug Thug Human Achievement Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Evolutionary Genetics Human Evolutionary Genomics Human Genetics Human Genomics Human Rights Human Rights Watch Humor Hungary Hunt For The Great White Defendant Hunter Biden Hunter-Gatherers I.F. Stone I.Q. I.Q. Genomics #IBelieveInHavenMonahan ICC Icj Ideas Identity Ideology And Worldview IDF Idiocracy Igbo Igor Shafarevich Ilan Pappe Ilhan Omar Illegal Immigration Ilyushin IMF Impeachment Imperialism Imran Awan Inbreeding Income India Indian IQ Indians Individualism Indo-Europeans Indonesia Inequality Inflation Intelligence Intelligence Agencies Intelligent Design International International Affairs International Comparisons International Court Of Justice International Criminal Court International Relations Internet Interracial Marriage Interracism Intersectionality Intifada Intra-Racism Intraracism Invade Invite In Hock Invade The World Invite The World Iosef Stalin Iosif Stalin Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iranian Nuclear Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Irish Is Love Colorblind Isaac Herzog ISIS Islam Islamic Jihad Islamic State Islamism Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Bonds Israel Defense Force Israel Defense Forces Israel Separation Wall Israeli Occupation IT Italy Itamar Ben-Gvir It's Okay To Be White Ivanka Ivy League J Street Jacky Rosen Jair Bolsonaro Jake Sullivan Jake Tapper Jamal Khashoggi James Angleton James B. Watson James Clapper James Comey James Forrestal James Jeffrey James Mattis James Watson Janet Yellen Janice Yellen Japan Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Greenblatt JASTA JCPOA JD Vance Jeb Bush Jeffrey Epstein Jeffrey Goldberg Jeffrey Sachs Jen Psaki Jennifer Rubin Jens Stoltenberg Jeremy Corbyn Jerry Seinfeld Jerusalem Jerusalem Post Jesuits Jesus Jesus Christ Jewish Genetics Jewish History Jewish Intellectuals Jewish Power Jewish Power Party Jewish Supremacism JFK Assassination JFK Jr. Jihadis Jill Stein Jimmy Carter Jingoism JINSA Joe Lieberman Joe Rogan John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John F. Kennedy John Hagee John Hawks John Kirby John Kiriakou John McCain John McLaughlin John Mearsheimer Joker Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Greenblatt Jonathan Pollard Jordan Peterson Joseph Kennedy Joseph McCarthy Josh Gottheimer Josh Paul Journalism Judaism Judea Judge George Daniels Judicial System Julian Assange Jussie Smollett Justice Justin Trudeau Kaboom Kahanists Kaiser Wilhelm Kamala Harris Kamala On Her Knees Kanye West Karabakh War 2020 Karen Kwiatkowski Karine Jean-Pierre Kashmir Kata'ib Hezbollah Kay Bailey Hutchison Kazakhstan Keir Starmer Kenneth Marcus Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Williamson Khazars Khrushchev Kids Kim Jong Un Kinship Kkk KKKrazy Glue Of The Coalition Of The Fringes Knesset Kompromat Korea Korean War Kosovo Kris Kobach Kristi Noem Ku Klux Klan Kubrick Kurds Kushner Foundation Kyle Rittenhouse Kyrie Irving Language Laos Larry C. Johnson Late Obama Age Collapse Latin America Latinos Laura Loomer Law Lawfare LDNR Lead Poisoning Leahy Amendments Leahy Law Lebanon Lee Kuan Yew Leftism Lenin Leo Frank Leo Strauss Let's Talk About My Hair LGBT LGBTI Liberal Opposition Liberal Whites Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libya Light Skin Preference Lindsey Graham Linguistics Literacy Literature Lithuania Litvinenko Living Standards Liz Cheney Liz Truss Lloyd Austin Localism long-range-missile-defense Longevity Looting Lord Of The Rings Lorde Loudoun County Louis Farrakhan Love And Marriage Low-fat Lukashenko Lula Lyndon B Johnson Lyndon Johnson Madeleine Albright Mafia MAGA Magnitsky Act Malaysia Malaysian Airlines MH17 Manosphere Manufacturing Mao Zedong Map Marco Rubio Maria Butina Marijuana Marine Le Pen Marjorie Taylor Greene Mark Milley Mark Steyn Mark Warner Marriage Martin Luther King Martin Scorsese Marvel Marx Marxism Masculinity Mass Shootings Mate Choice Mathematics Mathilde Krim Matt Gaetz Max Boot Max Weber Maxine Waters Mayans McCain McCain/POW McDonald's Meat Media Media Bias Medicine Medieval Christianity Medieval Russia Mediterranean Diet Medvedev Megan McCain Meghan Markle Mein Obama MEK Mel Gibson Men With Gold Chains Meng Wanzhou Mental Health Mental Illness Mental Traits Meritocracy Merkel Merkel Youth Merkel's Boner Merrick Garland Mexico MH 17 MI-6 Michael Bloomberg Michael Collins PIper Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Michael Jackson Michael Lind Michael McFaul Michael Moore Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michelle Goldberg Michelle Ma Belle Michelle Obama Microaggressions Middle Ages Middle East Migration Mike Huckabee Mike Johnson Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mike Waltz Mikhael Gorbachev Miles Mathis Militarized Police Military Military Analysis Military Budget Military History Military Spending Military Technology Millennials Milner Group Minimum Wage Minneapolis Minorities Miriam Adelson Miscellaneous Misdreavus Mishima Missile Defense Mitch McConnell Mitt Romney Mixed-Race MK-Ultra Mohammed Bin Salman Monarchy Mondoweiss Money Mongolia Mongols Monkeypox Monogamy Moon Landing Hoax Moon Landings Moore's Law Morality Mormonism Mormons Mortality Mortgage Moscow Mossad Movies Muhammad Multiculturalism Music Muslim Ban Muslims Mussolini NAEP Naftali Bennett Nakba NAMs Nancy Pelos Nancy Pelosi Narendra Modi NASA Nation Of Hate Nation Of Islam National Assessment Of Educational Progress National Debt National Endowment For Democracy National Review National Security Strategy National Socialism National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans Natural Gas Nature Vs. Nurture Navalny Affair Navy Standards Nazis Nazism Neandertals Neanderthals Near Abroad Negrolatry Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolibs Neolithic Neoreaction Netherlands Never Again Education Act New Cold War New Dark Age New Horizon Foundation New Orleans New Silk Road New Tes New World Order New York New York City New York Times New Zealand New Zealand Shooting NFL Nicholas II Nicholas Wade Nick Eberstadt Nick Fuentes Nicolas Maduro Niger Nigeria Nike Nikki Haley NIMBY Nina Jankowicz No Fly Zone Noam Chomsky Nobel Prize Nord Stream Nord Stream Pipelines Nordics Norman Braman Norman Finkelstein Norman Lear North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway Novorossiya NSA Nuclear Power Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Nuremberg Nutrition NYPD Obama Obama Presidency Obamacare Obesity Obituary Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Wall Street October Surprise Oedipus Complex OFAC Oil Oil Industry Oklahoma City Bombing Olav Scholz Old Testament Oliver Stone Olympics Open Borders OpenThread Opinion Poll Opioids Orban Organized Crime Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Orwell Osama Bin Laden OTFI Our Soldiers Speak Out Of Africa Model Paganism Pakistan Pakistani Paleoanthropology Paleocons Palestine Palestinians Palin Panhandling Papacy Paper Review Parasite Burden Parenting Parenting Paris Attacks Partly Inbred Extended Family Pat Buchanan Pathogens Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Findley Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Durov Pavel Grudinin Paypal Peace Peak Oil Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Pentagon Personal Genomics Personality Pete Buttgieg Pete Buttigieg Pete Hegseth Peter Frost Peter Thiel Peter Turchin Petro Poroshenko Pew Phil Rushton Philadelphia Philippines Philosophy Phoenicians Phyllis Randall Physiognomy Piers Morgan Pigmentation Pigs Pioneers Piracy PISA Pizzagate POC Ascendancy Podcast Poland Police Police State Polio Political Correctness Makes You Stupid Political Dissolution Political Economy Politicians Politics Polling Pollution Polygamy Polygyny Pope Francis Population Population Genetics Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Porn Pornography Portland Portugal Portuguese Post-Apocalypse Poverty Power Pramila Jayapal PRC Prediction Prescription Drugs President Joe Biden Presidential Race '08 Presidential Race '12 Presidential Race '16 Presidential Race '20 Prince Andrew Prince Harry Priti Patel Privacy Privatization Progressives Propaganda Prostitution protest Protestantism Proud Boys Psychology Psychometrics Psychopathy Public Health Public Schools Puerto Rico Puritans Putin Putin Derangement Syndrome QAnon Qassem Soleimani Qatar Quantitative Genetics Quebec Quiet Skies Quincy Institute R2P Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race/IQ Race Riots Rachel Corrie Racial Purism Racial Reality Racialism Racism Rafah Raj Shah Rand Paul Randy Fine Rap Music Rape Rashida Tlaib Rationality Ray McGovern Raymond Chandler Razib Khan Real Estate RealWorld Recep Tayyip Erdogan Red Sea Refugee Crisis #refugeeswelcome Religion Religion And Philosophy Rentier Reparations Reprint Republican Party Republicans Review Revisionism Rex Tillerson RFK Assassination Ricci Richard Dawkins Richard Goldberg Richard Grenell Richard Haas Richard Haass Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Rightwing Cinema Riots R/k Theory RMAX Robert A. Heinlein Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Ford Robert Kagan Robert Kraft Robert Maxwell Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert O'Brien Robert Reich Robots Rock Music Roe Vs. Wade Roger Waters Rolling Stone Roman Empire Romania Romanticism Rome Ron DeSantis Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rotherham Rothschilds RT International Rudy Giuliani Rush Limbaugh Russiagate Russian Demography Russian Elections 2018 Russian History Russian Media Russian Military Russian Nationalism Russian Occupation Government Russian Orthodox Church Russian Reaction Russians Russophobes Russophobia Russotriumph Ruth Bader Ginsburg Rwanda Sabrina Rubin Erdely Sacha Baron Cohen Sacklers Sailer Strategy Sailer's First Law Of Female Journalism Saint Peter Tear Down This Gate! Saint-Petersburg Salman Rushie Salt Sam Bankman-Fried Sam Francis Samantha Power Samson Option San Bernadino Massacre Sandra Beleza Sandy Hook Sapir-Whorf SAT Satanic Age Satanism Saudi Arabia Scandal Science Denialism Science Fiction Scooter Libby Scotland Scott Ritter Scrabble Sean Hannity Seattle Secession Select Post Self Determination Self Indulgence Semites Serbia Sergei Lavrov Sergei Skripal Sergey Glazyev Seth Rich Sex Sex Differences Sex Ratio At Birth Sexual Harassment Sexual Selection Sexuality Seymour Hersh Shai Masot Shakespeare Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Shared Environment Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shimon Peres Shireen Abu Akleh Shmuley Boteach Shoah Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shulamit Aloni Shurat HaDin Sigal Mandelker Sigar Pearl Mandelker Sigmund Freud Silicon Valley Singapore Single Men Single Women Sinotriumph Six Day War Sixties SJWs Skin Color Slavery Slavery Reparations Slavoj Zizek Slavs Smart Fraction Social Justice Warriors Social Media Social Science Socialism Society Sociobiology Sociology Sodium Solzhenitsyn Somalia Sotomayor South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea Southeast Asia Soviet History Soviet Union Sovok Space Space Exploration Space Program Spain Spanish Spanish River High School SPLC Sport Sports Srebrenica St Petersburg International Economic Forum Stabby Somali Staffan Stage Stalinism Standardized Tests Star Trek Star Wars Starvation Comparisons State Department Statistics Statue Of Liberty Steny Hoyer Stephen Cohen Stephen Colbert Stephen Harper Stephen Jay Gould Stephen Townsend Stereotypes Steroids Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steven Pinker Strait Of Hormuz Strategic Ambiguity Stuart Levey Stuart Seldowitz Student Debt Stuff White People Like Sub-replacement Fertility Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subhas Chandra Bose Subprime Mortgage Crisis Suburb Suella Braverman Sugar Suicide Superintelligence Supreme Court Susan Glasser Svidomy Sweden Switzerland Symington Amendment Syrian Civil War Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Take Action Taliban Talmud Tatars Taxation Taxes Tea Party Technical Considerations Technology Ted Cruz Telegram Television Terrorism Terrorists Terry McAuliffe Tesla Testing Testosterone Tests Texas THAAD Thailand The 10/7 Project The AK The American Conservative The Bell Curve The Bible The Black Autumn The Cathedral The Confederacy The Constitution The Eight Banditos The Family The Free World The Great Awokening The Left The Middle East The New York Times The South The States The Zeroth Amendment To The Constitution Theranos Theresa May Third World Thomas Jefferson Thomas Moorer Thought Crimes Tiananmen Massacre Tiger Mom TikTok TIMSS Tom Cotton Tom Massie Tom Wolfe Tony Blair Tony Blinken Tony Kleinfeld Too Many White People Torture Trade Trans Fat Trans Fats Transgender Transgenderism Transhumanism Translation Translations Transportation Travel Trayvon Martin Trolling True Redneck Stereotypes Trump Trump Derangement Syndrome Trust Tsarist Russia Tucker Carlson Tulsa Tulsi Gabbard Turkey Turks TWA 800 Twins Twitter Ucla UFOs UK Ukrainian Crisis UN Security Council Unbearable Whiteness Unemployment Unions United Kingdom United Nations United Nations General Assembly United Nations Security Council United States Universal Basic Income UNRWA Urbanization Ursula Von Der Leyen Uruguay US Blacks US Capitol Storming 2021 US Civil War II US Constitution US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 US Regionalism USA USAID USS Liberty USSR Uyghurs Uzbekistan Vaccination Vaccines Valdimir Putin Valerie Plame Vdare Venezuela Vibrancy Victoria Nuland Victorian England Video Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Vikings Viktor Orban Viktor Yanukovych Violence Vioxx Virginia Virginia Israel Advisory Board Vitamin D Vivek Ramaswamy Vladimir Zelensky Volodymur Zelenskyy Volodymyr Zelensky Vote Fraud Voter Fraud Voting Rights Voting Rights Act Vulcan Society Wall Street Walmart Wang Ching Wei Wang Jingwei War War Crimes War Guilt War In Donbass War On Christmas War On Terror War Powers War Powers Act Warhammer Washington DC WASPs Watergate Wealth Wealth Inequality Wealthy Web Traffic Weight WEIRDO Welfare Wendy Sherman West Bank Western Decline Western European Marriage Pattern Western Hypocrisy Western Media Western Religion Western Revival Westerns White America White Americans White Death White Flight White Guilt White Helmets White Liberals White Man's Burden White Nakba White Nationalism White Nationalists White People White Privilege White Slavery White Supremacy White Teachers Whiterpeople Whites Who Whom Whoopi Goldberg Wikileaks Wikipedia William Browder William F. Buckley William Kristol William Latson William McGonagle William McRaven WINEP Winston Churchill WMD Woke Capital Women Woodrow Wilson Workers Working Class World Bank World Economic Forum World Health Organization World Population World Values Survey World War G World War H World War Hair World War I World War III World War R World War T World War Weed WTF WVS WWII Xi Jinping Xinjiang Yahya Sinwar Yair Lapid Yemen Yevgeny Prigozhin Yoav Gallant Yogi Berra's Restaurant Yoram Hazony YouTube Yugoslavia Yuval Noah Harari Zbigniew Brzezinski Zimbabwe Zionism Zionists Zvika Fogel
Nothing found
Filter?
All Commenters •ï¿½My
Comments
•ï¿½Followed
Commenters
⇅All Comments
�⇅All Comments
    There are two popular clips going around on social media this week of Russians talking about the inevitability of nuclear war. They are both from Russia 1, which is state television. Remember that RT is also Russian state media, and not really very well-edited, in terms of promoting a consistent agenda, so given the “shrugâ€...
  • Alrenous says: •ï¿½Website

    so given the “shrug†mentality of Russians when it comes to narrative control, I don’t think it’s fair to assume that every talking point is overseen directly by the Kremlin.

    The saying:
    “Tender-handed stroke a nettle,
    And it stings you, for your pains:
    Grasp it like a man of mettle,
    And it soft as silk remains.”

    Apparently this is genuinely true of nettles? It’s not true of politics, though. Trying to grasp the narrative “like a man of mettle” comes off as weak and desperate. The more frantically you clutch for control, the less control you have and the more you need. Quite hard to be more self-destructive than going full hall monitor.

    [MORE]

    While the US is talking about “our values of who we are in a democracy rules based order of stolen yachts,†Russia is saying “well, we’re all going to die some day anyway.”

    Why Russians gotta be so Russian? They can’t keep getting away with it, can they?
    Narcissism: “I am American, therefore everyone is American. Why would I pretend to act so Russian, the way Russians do?” Literally can’t conceive of a different culture and thinks they’re faking it.

    Can’t imagine an army that doesn’t absolutely freak out when a soldier dies.
    Russia: “People die in war. It’s a thing. That’ll happen if you join the army.”
    American: “Why would you lie like this?”

    As the Russians say – and this is true – there is not even any evidence that if Russia started firing nukes, the West would even respond.

    The way to do this is have two launching sequences.

    First, plan for a perfectly limited shot, which you announce beforehand. “We’re firing nukes from roughly A and B, five individual missiles, targetting these exact GPS co-ordinates.” Could be sober and adult about it.

    Then, have a second expedited launching sequence in case they try to pre-empt your launch. “Yeah sorry that’s not how this works. We would have liked a controlled exchange, but I guess we’re doing this way instead? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯”

    What actually happens is America is indeed likely to panic and fire all ze missiles, the same way a cop always panics and empties their clip at whatever they try to shoot at. However, there is a very high chance that very few of those missiles actually go boom. Could be as low as 5%, though I figure it’s about 25-30%. Small chance it’s higher, like 60%.

    Regardless, there will be a lot of malfunctioning. Much the same way America can’t field a warship these days without crashing into something or lighting it on fire.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Pat Kittle
    @Alrenous


    the same way a cop always panics and empties their clip at whatever they try to shoot at.
    �
    Actually cops don't "always... empty their clip," but when they do they may have a good reason. The criminal is often hyped up on meth, and can still return (often automatic) fire even after they've been hit several times.

    Granted, it would be great if cops were ordered to protect non-woke free speech, instead of enabling the criminals opposing it.

    Replies: @Alrenous
  • "He that filches from me my good name robs me of that which not enriches him, and makes me poor indeed," Iago tells Othello in William Shakespeare's play. The belief that defamation is serious, and that the perpetrator of libel or slander deserves to be punished, is a standard trope in popular culture. The Hollywood...
  • Mac_ says:

    The matters in article Ted writes about are more important than people recognize. It goes to censoring schemes and schemes to disable, so any scum can spew what they want, which can be violence inciting, and we can’t make them stop without using force, which if the false courts don’t let you stop people from defaming you by use of courts, the same time dictate you can’t use force to stop them, its tying your hands as you’re attacked and setup for further attack. If someone acting on false claims about you does violence and gets away, because you didn’t use force first to stop scum from saying false things, where are we then. Obviously this isn’t telling anyone to use force, every person is responsible on what they do, and though violence is natural the point is the comparison, that there seems setup being done to make everyone -but the cons and insiders, open to attack and theft or violence the same time dictate people tie their hands if they follow supposed ‘laws’.

    In the same pot, mentioned before is the con of courts and ‘litigation privilege’ where predators and con lawyers are able to falsely label or accuse whatever, short of crime, and if they don’t include in causes of action it’s supposedly ‘ok’ even without evidence to bash at you to extort whatever they want. It’s the same as court papers are public and going to be further put online openly before long. If there is no truth to what is said it’s slanderous, defamatory, yet lawyers scribbling ‘laws’ claiming defamation is ‘only if’ blah blah, takes away ability, but keeps the extortion scheme, and pumps the predator world disorder.

    Also noticed supposed ‘hacking’ that magically continues, which at this point between corporations, utility monopoly etc in my opinion adds to the scheme because no way anyone ‘hacks’ into those systems. The fake hackings to claim everyone’s info has been hacked so then can be further hacked and people stolen from by predators in the schemes. Similar con, lately noticed the utility monopoly in my area when you call the ‘recording’ before you talk to anyone now claims you’re subject to their ‘online privacy policies’, which if you look, allows them to share your name and info. Why is a supposed ‘utility’ dictating ‘online policies’ if you’re calling them and not ‘online’. For that matter, how is it they got to monopolize electricity. People are not paying attention. In my opinion the stuff is tied together, and it’s unfortunate people assume if they ‘go along’ ignoring they won’t be affected. They’re wrong about that.

    Appreciate the article.

  • The good news we've learned since Russian invaded Ukraine back on February 24 is that Russia is militarily weaker than most people expected. The future is unwritten, so this could change with time. After all, the Red Army that invaded Finland in November 1939 was a lot less competent than the Red Army that invaded...
  • HA says:
    @PhysicistDave
    @HA

    My dear old friend HA wrote to me:

    No, the reason the Russians got to Mariupol is because they had two traitors (or, as you like to call them, “peace advocatesâ€) in Kherson (to the West of Mariupol) who basically gave up the city without a fight, allowing them to wage a two-sided attack.
    �
    Well, as it becomes clearer and clearer over the next few months that the Penis Piano Player is a dangerously delusional psychotic, you are going to see more and more and more of these "traitors."

    I'm getting a real kick, old pal, out of seeing all you Zelensky worshipers coming up with one excuse after another as to why the massive defeat of Russia so many of you predicted just is not happening.

    Reality bites, doesn't it?

    When Hitler lost, he concluded that the Germans were just not quite the noble Aryans he had thought they were. Couldn't possibly be that der Führer was an insane moron who destroyed his (adopted) country, right?

    And you apologists for the neo-Nazis of the Azov Battalion are also going to have the excuse that you would have won if not for those traitorous Ukrainians who refused to die to satisfy your war-porn addiction.

    HA also wrote:

    As for these supply lines that are cut off, I’m not seeing that. Even if that were to happen later, there’s always helicopters.
    �
    Oh, that'll work! Because the Russians would never even think of shooting down copters that are resupplying the enemy!

    Do you know how easy it is to shoot down a copter?

    HA also wrote:

    No, even though cowards like you and Clifford keep talking about how the West is going down, for some strange reason, all those “Syrians†keep banging on the gates of Vienna (and Berlin and Stockholm) to let them in.
    �
    You mean Clifford the Big Red Dog?

    The West is very rich, but living off its past capital -- eating its seed corn, so to speak. Lots of people want to get in on that wealth, but if something cannot go on forever, it won't. And the self-destructive economic policies of the West cannot go on forever.

    HA also wrote:

    Until then, you’re just doing the same old “save your soul†hypocrisy shtick you’ve done before, where you vehemently condemn with fire-and-brimstone fury anyone else who preaches things they believe are lies ...
    �
    Yeah, I do still condemn preachers who publicly preach from the pulpit sermons that they privately admit are lies.

    Don't you?

    No, of course, you don't! You admire people who openly lie -- which is why you yourself pretend that you are on the side of the Ukrainian people when you are really just shilling for the Western ruling elite who are using Ukrainians as cannon fodder for the real goal that dumb old Lloyd Austin blurted out a few days ago: "“We want to see Russia weakened..."

    Hopefully, as more and more Ukrainians come to realize how they are being used by the illegal puppet regime in Kiev and by the ruling elite in the West, more and more will become "traitors" to the Kiev Nazi regime. And then the war can end.

    And then you can enjoy spending years claiming that the Kiev dictatorship would have won if not for those dastardly "traitors."

    Just like Hitler did.

    Except you will probably live longer.

    Take care, my friend.

    Replies: @HA, @JimDandy, @HA

    “You mean Clifford the Big Red Dog?”

    No, I mean Clifford Brown, who was one of the first on this thread to belt out the “the ignorant, degenerate West” refrain so prominent in your own comment history. You thanked him for that comment yourself, but evidently you’ve already forgotten him. Do try and keep up, PhysicistDave; surely, you can catch up on on Clifford the Big Red Dog some other time.

    And as for the name Quin-Zhi, which also perplexed you, here’s what looks to be (from the URL) page #5 of the “Quin-Zhi” listing on Facebook. For some reason, that fifth page was the first listing that came up on my search engine, but even so, the name seems pretty legitimately Chinese to me. Are you sure your in-laws are Chinese?

  • There are two popular clips going around on social media this week of Russians talking about the inevitability of nuclear war. They are both from Russia 1, which is state television. Remember that RT is also Russian state media, and not really very well-edited, in terms of promoting a consistent agenda, so given the “shrugâ€...
  • @meamjojo
    You had a good article going there Andy, until the last paragraph, which was just dumb.

    I remind you what the Grand Poobah Trump had to say to Putin about nuclear war. We don't spend $800 billion on the military every year for no good reason.
    -------
    'There will be NO Russia' Donald Trump's horrific threat to Putin to stop nuclear war
    DONALD Trump warned Vladimir Putin there "would be no Russia" should the United States opt to unleash its full military power.

    Tue, Apr 26, 2022

    Donald Trump insisted the United States is holding onto better nuclear weapons than Russia as he issued a stern warning to Vladimir Putin. The Russian President put his nuclear arsenal on "high alert" two days into his invasion of Ukraine in February, fuelling fears of the conflict evolving into a global conflict. But speaking to TalkTV, the former US President warned Moscow that Russia would no longer exist should the US deploy its own arsenal.
    ....
    https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1601012/Trump-warning-Vladimir-Putin-Russia-nuclear-war-video-vn

    Replies: @Pierre de Craon, @Peter Rabbit

    First, Trump fails to contest an election that any five-year-old could see was stolen. Next, he stands idly by while his loyal, indeed devoted supporters get locked away in Guantanamo-like conditions for walking into the Capitol at the invitation of the FBI and the Capitol police.

    Now, doubtless at the prodding of mama’s boy Kushner, the Jew who does his thinking for him, Trump (who soon will be fatter even than William Howard Taft) tells the (((criminals))) who have been calumniating him and his millions of voters and supporters for nigh on a decade that he backs them in their efforts to make their never-ending war on white people and Christians go nuclear.

    So thanks, meamjojo, for offering readers evidence that Trump is a 100 percent sellout to the Jews and hence as worthless a moron and liar as you yourself are.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Rogue
    @Pierre de Craon

    I saw the interview that Meamjojo referred to.

    It was Blumpf at his blow-harding best (or worst).

    Agree with you about Trump's utter dereliction of duty to the so-called insurrectionists and, of course, he's an enthusiastic promoter of the clot shot.

    No end to birthright citizenship under his watch, no attempt to regulate big tech.

    Enough Trump, you've had your day. Just go play golf.
  • It is the opinion of most patriotic voices in Russian alt-media (remember, hardcore Russian patriots are still not allowed on mainstream media in Russia) that while the special operation in Ukraine is all well and good, there is no good explanation for why Ukraine was lost in the first place. How could the Kremlin let...
  • Good read sir . Putin’s just dumb. He may be the best bureaucrat of Russia since Stalin but his tactics and strategies of war and propaganda efforts (as you note) are dumb. Why not even tell your troops you’re invading so they can properly prepare logistics and such? Surprise surprise Rooskie derp while Ukraine/US guessed right months ahead and prepared. Not to mention so nation can mobilize (or not)? I’d feel suckered into this at this point if were a Russian when he finally decides to mobilize for real. Bad for moral from the start. Why is he keeping NATO’s choice as Central Bank head? Ton of other blunders. I’m nominally pro-russian as in I believe I believe in multi-lateralism Russia and China are claiming to wish for to offset the Neo-liberal western borg which seeks to turn every society into a soulless low wage consumerism but Putin is the wrong man for the job period. Need a hard core Nationalist or Socialist.

    •ï¿½Agree: peterAUS
    •ï¿½Troll: Notsofast
    •ï¿½Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
    @allgoodnamestaken

    NO recent history, then a spew of moronic lies. It must be wakey-wakey time in Lvov.

    Replies: @allgoodnamestaken
    , @dimples
    @allgoodnamestaken

    "Surprise surprise Rooskie derp while Ukraine/US guessed right months ahead and prepared. "

    Not so. Right up to the invasion Zelensky was saying that he did not think there would be any invasion. Also Uke troops stuck in Donbass ready to invade breakaway provinces did not get a move on. Now surrounded and outgunned, so deception appears to have had positive results. Too bad about cash in Euro banks though.

    Replies: @allgoodnamestaken
    , @haha
    @allgoodnamestaken

    "Putin is the wrong man for the job period."

    You are probably right. But the whole painful truth may be "Putin is the wrong man ruling a wrong country".

    Russia seems never to have fully recovered from the collapse of the Soviet Union. China successfully transitioned from a closed communist system to a much more open post-communist system with its state, institutions, economy, civilization, and pride in national identity getting stronger and stronger. Russia has still not transitioned successfully. In some ways it remains a post-communist disaster state and country, with its civilization and national pride deeply wounded.

    Replies: @antibeast, @allgoodnamestaken
  • The two most pressing issues of the day are Elon Musk’s plan to reinstate freedom of speech on Twitter and an impending war with Russia. Maybe these two issues can be tied together? First, let’s take a trip down Memory Lane and remember how we got to the point where we are begging a billionaire...
  • @peterAUS
    @j2


    ...peterAUS suggested earlier that this develops to a long war. There will be times without hostilities, freezing the conflict, and times of war...
    �
    That's not, really, what peterAUS suggested. Meant actually . He meant/means that there will be a stalemate along LONG front lines in Ukraine. There will, most definitely, be a LOT of hostilities , as missile/rocket/shell/bomb/etc firing all across/over it. Also, there will be a lot of sniping, small unit probes, raids, incursions etc.
    The line, in general, will be stable. In....general. It will also be shifting, constantly, up to a couple of kms.

    The stalemate will serve to properly prepare NATO, I mean Ukraine, for MAJOR incursions later on.
    Incursion and then, again, a stalemate with a LOT of hostilities.
    Probably a Russian (counter)incursion too. Etc. As those borders between states in "1984".

    The sole purpose, for NATO, is to weaken RF. W....e...a....k.......e...n..
    Weakening will mean increasing instability within RF and, hopefully (for NATO) a chance for regime change in Moscow.

    So, again, my (simple) take is:
    The Russian offensive (whatever this WW1 type "phase 2" is supposed to mean...) will fizzle out soon enough.
    We'll get a strategic stalemate, as described above. S....t...r...a..t...e...g...i...c.
    In tactical/operational sense we will, during that stalemate, have high intensity fighting here and there. The front will move some KMs either way/back/whatever. Blah...blah....I wrote something like this a couple of weeks after the start of this debacle.

    No matter what Rusophiles or, worse, Putintards imagine, that's what's going to happen. Even a mobilization in Russia won't make any difference, except more death and destruction for both sides there. Greater instability in RF, too.

    M.I.C will love it. Banking/financial system too, of course. Ruling elites everywhere too. Including Russia; unless they do get replaced, that is.

    1 % everywhere win; the rest, especially in Russia and even more in Ukraine lose.
    What's not to like?

    Replies: @annamaria, @j2

    “peterAUS” do you belong to a bellingcat brigade?
    https://thesaker.is/sitrep-operation-z-17/

    The 2nd in command of Bellingcat [the MI6/CIA fat and ignorant cutout] said Russia would “collapse†by the coming Sunday, on March 4th.

    The reality:

    the US will continue to send weaponry to Ukraine, until there is no longer any Ukrainian soldier capable of wielding it. Russia will proceed to destroy these weapons before they reach the line of contact, and if they do they will be captured.

    The US will resort to all kinds of mercenaries, including regular troops from its NATO satellites. The devastation of Europe, starting with the Eastern countries, will be inevitable. The decrepit colonial Europe, militarily occupied by the US since the end of WWII, will know the pains of being a colony. And it will discover itself as a disposable resource in the hands of its owner.

    Conceived by Imperium as another Afghanistan for Russia, the war in Ukraine will become the new Vietnam for the US. On the wide horizon steppes of Ukraine, the US will lose its sense of perspective. And it will find itself with no way out.

    There is no reason for Russia to be in a hurry. Not least because the war leads to a stalemate. We will come to the brink of nuclear Armageddon.

    It is so touching and predictable that an admirer of Bandera followers (peterAUS) finds a receptive ear and understanding from a talmudist (j2).

    •ï¿½Replies: @j2
    @annamaria

    "It is so touching and predictable that an admirer of Bandera followers (peterAUS) finds a receptive ear and understanding from a talmudist (j2). "

    Dear annamaria. It is not that peterAUS is a Bandera admirer or that I am a talmudist. It is simply that peterAUS and me have some minor understanding of military issues. I guess we both also dislike the style of war that Russia makes, but that is because war is today played by rules and Russia is breaking these rules. Some centuries ago the Russian style (stealing from, raping and killing civilians) would have been the normal way that everybody expects from an army.

    Replies: @Spanky
  • In 2013, I published a photo essay of Minneapolis that showed how foreign and non-white huge swathes of the city had become. Recently, I visited the city for the first time since the riots in 2020, and went back to Lake Street, a major road and the site of most of my 2013 photos. Things...
  • White liberals love that.

    They built it.

    Let them fix it.

  • Everyone is sort of waiting to pull the trigger on going back on Twitter, because the team was still banning people up until a few hours ago. But we’ve now got a high profile hero returning with an unmolested account. We’ve got many others if we search “I’m back.†Along with making new accounts, people...
  • Wow this Punch Brother character goes on about how relentless Sandy Hook “truthers” are and how you should never engage them and what does he do–he engages them again and again and again. (I like the “fuck you” as well, I guess that’s the tell that he should have taken his own advice)

    Oh and here’s Natalie Hammond giving a talk to a group of educators about her experiences on 12/14/12. This is a woman who supposedly saw 26 toddlers get massacred and she’s making quips about her shoes and how she had bacon that morning and felt unusually alert. Seems legit.

    https://youtu.be/XXPkeLihYbo
    Video Link

    •ï¿½Replies: @Punch Brother Punch
    @Bragadocious

    This speech appears to have been given 3 years after the shooting. She's never allowed to tell a lame joke again because she once got shot? She's supposed to go around, years later, in sackcloth and ashes, drenched in tears, in order to allay your suspicions?

    This is typical conspiratard behavior: making unreasonable demands of victims, inferring incongruous behavior or affect despite the fact that, as a conspiratard, ipso facto you have no understanding of basic human psychology or how the real world works. You interpret the world in a cartoonish fashion and when people don't behave in cartoon-like ways you think you've uncovered evidence of something sinister.

    This is why I advise not engaging with your lot. It's a pointless waste of time. Your brains are irremediably broken.

    Replies: @emerging majority
    , @Punch Brother Punch
    @Bragadocious

    Incidentally, Hammond didn't see any of the children get killed that day. She was among the first group of adults - along with the principal and school psychologist - that Lanza shot immediately after entering the building. She then crawled into a conference room where she hid for the remainder of the shooting.

    If you're going to discuss an event - even an "alleged" one - try to get the basic facts correct.
  • Is this it? Did a white South African just spend $44 billion to make the slur of white supremacist irrelevant? Because when trying to uplift the idea of free speech and defeat the concept of censorship and baseless accusations about "white power" when faced with undeniable truth, Elon Musk's bid to acquire Twitter may have...
  • loren says:

    O MY GOSH

    CBS Chicago
    Whole Foods will be closing its store in Englewood, six years after opening a grocery store in what had once been a food desert on the South Side. CBS 2’s Tara Molina reports.

    Many shocked as Englewood Whole Foods is set to close


    Video Link

    •ï¿½Replies: @AR in Illinois
    @loren

    Back when this store was set to open, the Second City Cop blog was still online. Every single commenter said it would only be there a couple years at most. Guess they enjoyed taking a loss for a lot more years than all the readers thought!! My guess is that they were in the red (permanently) within the first year. But, hey, their libtard stockholders, owners and CEOs can virtue signal that they, at least, TRIED!! LOL
    , @usNthem
    @loren

    If chimpcongo had properly prepped the area, job one would have been removing the nigras. Of course, nothing is said as to WHY the store is closing. Couldn’t possibly be that they’re being shoplifted blind - could it??
    , @Howa.308
    @loren

    A couple new ones from this story. I'm used to hearing about food deserts and the "lack of fresh fruit" being a reason for blacks health problems. That community organizer (whatever the fuck that means) said this was the only store where people could get smoothies and the only store that was well lit. Those are 2 new ones to me. Yep so not having smoothie access has been one of the roots of blacks health issues along with no fresh fruit and 40w bulbs instead of 80w bulbs in the lights. Hope youre taking notes. This list is pretty extensive
    , @Abolish_public_education
    @loren

    W*M opened a store in a crappy part of my old town. The store always looked like a tornado had struck. The line at returns was always out the door. One time, when I opened my [big] box at home, I discovered that its contents had been switched. Someone had returned a piece of junk and claimed a refund.

    The store closed after a few years. Near the end, even its most ordinary items, like packages of underwear, were locked up.

    Replies: @anarchyst
    , @Sick 'n Tired
    @loren

    Now where are the 350lb sheboons supposed to buy their quinoa and wheat grass juice with an EBT card?
  • From KQED: The opening of the article is overstating many of the changes currently being considered, but that's indicative of which way the wind is blowing. When you abolish the use of admissions tests, as the University of California just did in order to let in more of The Diverse, you are immediately going to...
  • @RoatanBill
    Here's what's wrong with the whole world, but particularly the US.

    Harvard University.
    FrSem 63W - Vegetal Humanities

    This class invites you to practice a new kind of plant-consciousness. Our guides will be contemporary artists and thinkers who are encouraging new relationships between human and vegetal life, or recalling very old ones. Suddenly, we have plant protagonists, gardens in galleries, and botany-based forms of philosophy, architecture, music and more. ....

    Read the whole description @ : https://haa.fas.harvard.edu/classes/frsem-63w

    This bullshit passes for education, and at Harvard, no less.

    You want a good laugh (or cry), go to : https://careerkarma.com/blog/humanities-courses/

    Check out what's on offer in the Humanities.

    Replies: @Ralph B. Seymour, @That Would Be Telling

    Everybody I have ever known that went to either Harvard or Yale, while firmly convinced of their own brilliance, was unimpressive.

    Beyond the fact that the emperor obviously has no clothes—- it’s a joke.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Been_there_done_that
    @Ralph B. Seymour


    Everybody I have ever known that went to either Harvard or Yale, while firmly convinced of their own brilliance, was unimpressive.
    �
    Harvard could – but likely will not – go back to its roots and require proven proficiency in Ancient Greek and Latin of all applicants before even being considered for acceptance.
    , @HammerJack
    @Ralph B. Seymour


    Everybody I have ever known that went to either Harvard or Yale, while firmly convinced of their own brilliance, was unimpressive.
    �
    Confirmation bias, of a kind. Besides being self-reported, your sample is exclusively composed of those who made a point of saying where they went to school. Particularly when the school is prestigious, such people are uniformly losers. I've also found that they are (mercifully) rare.
  • Fr0m the New York Times Science section: Anglo-Saxon Kings Made Sure to Eat Their Vegetables, Study Shows Contrary to popular belief, the ruling classes gorged on meat only on rare occasions, according to an analysis of more than 2,000 skeletons buried during medieval times. By Maria Cramer April 29, 2022 Anglo-Saxon kings have long reigned...
  • @Jonathan Mason
    @Reg Cæsar


    BTW, why are meatballs called faggots in England? Were they cooked at stake-burnings?
    �
    Faggots comes from a Greek root meaning a bundle, and the general sense is a bundle of sticks used for kindling, or to make a broom.

    A faggot-type meatball is a bundle of different offal meats combined to make a tasty but cheap meal.

    The word faggot, meaning a homosexual, is commonly used in the United States, and possibly derives from the sense of describing somebody as a 'bundle' being a derogatory term usually applied to women as in phrases like 'useless bundle'.

    In our day and age of political correctness such colorful language and terminology has gone out of fashion in literature, but you will often find such phrases in the stories of Sherlock Holmes or other literature of that era.

    Replies: @Bill Jones, @Reg Cæsar, @Jim Don Bob

    One of the joys of the English Language is the multiple uses of words. One of the sub-texts of the hatred of Putin is his failure to sufficiently celebrate sodomites and similar. It makes me smile that the German decision to ban Russian coal inevitably means that in order to stay warm German’s will be reduced to burning faggots.

  • @Intelligent Dasein
    @HA


    Could it not also be the case that medieval harvesting methods left a lot of grain on the ground (relative to modern techniques) because they were relatively lame, and people simply weren’t able to obtain anything better at the time?
    �
    No, that could not be the case, you stupid, fake-and-gay troll. You idiot.

    The people who built this....


    https://files.structurae.net/files/photos/5256/2018-07-31/dsc03250.jpeg


    ....certainly could have turned this....


    https://uploads.wildseed.co.uk/1652-1000-90.jpg


    ....into this.


    https://i.etsystatic.com/6130739/r/il/da120d/1829199245/il_794xN.1829199245_j3v9.jpg


    I already know that you, Jack D, Alden, Rosie, and Twinkie are all sock puppets who assist Ron Unz in the task of making sure that nothing meaningful ever develops among the dissident-inclined readers who gather here, and I don't even need Elon Musk's resources to prove it. The timing of your responses does the job all by itself.

    Replies: @Anon, @HA, @Twinkie, @Reg Cæsar

    You forgot res, Travis, RegCæsar, Priss Factor and many more

    •ï¿½Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @Anon

    You forgot the worst offender of all-- "Anon".
  • It is the opinion of most patriotic voices in Russian alt-media (remember, hardcore Russian patriots are still not allowed on mainstream media in Russia) that while the special operation in Ukraine is all well and good, there is no good explanation for why Ukraine was lost in the first place. How could the Kremlin let...
  • @Olivier1973
    @Verymuchalive


    The demands will be very much greater now.
    �
    Like a Kherson PR, then a Zaporoje PR, then a Nikolaev PR, then a Dniepropetrovsk PR, then a Kharkov PR, then an Odessa PR, etc.

    Replies: @Ace

    Sounds good.

  • From a UK.gov website: From the BBC in 2012: Britain's showmen: All the fun of the fair? By Emma Kasprzak BBC News Published12 April 2012 As the travelling fair season begins, fairground workers from all over Britain are heading out on to the road. But while their presence is familiar, what do we really know...
  • @prosa123
    Other peculiarities of their ethnic classifications:

    Sikhs are classified separately from Indians.
    Of all East Asian groups the Chinese are the only named one, other groups being in the "Other" category.
    It distinguishes between black Africans and black Caribbeans, something not done in the US.
    There's no specific category for Latin Americans, though that might be because there aren't many of them.

    Though not apparent from this form, I believe that in Britain (and Scotland) there is no One Drop Rule. The idea, so common in the US, of a completely white-appearing person identifying as black because of a dark-skinned ancestor many generations ago is utterly mystifying.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Muggles, @AnotherDad

    Though not apparent from this form, I believe that in Britain (and Scotland) there is no One Drop Rule.

    Contra whatever you see on the BBC or Netflix there basically were no black people in Britain before the Windrush. A normal English person in the countryside would never have seen a black. In the cities outside London a rare sight–“oh a black fellow”. Discounting black American GIs posted during the War, estimates are in the range of at most 0.05% of the British population prior to 1948. The joint made Iowa look like Mississippi.

    Literally too few blacks to even have a “rule”. But to the extent there was a rule, my guess was it was the same: if visibly black they are “black” and not suitable romantic interests for respectable people.

  • There is technically still some possibility that the Elon Musk deal to purchase Twitter and reinstate freedom of speech could fall through, but this does not appear likely. What appears likely is that he is going to take over the company, and then probably be put in prison a few days or weeks later. However,...
  • Alrenous says: •ï¿½Website
    @Mark G.
    @Chris Moore


    That meme with the left moving to the far left reminds me of Reagan’s quip, “I didn’t leave the Democratic Party, the Democratic Party left me.â€

    �
    One thing I've noticed over the last few years is that people I used to put in the leftist category like Glenn Greenwald, Matt Taibbi, Bill Maher, Alex Berenson, Joe Rogan, Elon Musk and Russell Brand now sometimes say things that actually sound sensible to me. Maybe I've moved to the left but most likely they have been put off by some of the crazier excesses and increasing authoritarianism of leftism and are moving to the right.

    Replies: @Alrenous

    It’s hard to be perfectly insane.

    Normally the general naivete and foolishness gives you a gestalt impression and you don’t remember the details. However, lately, the real go-getters have been putting in the work, really dedicating to leftism, and sounding completely batshit nutty. The regular naive and ignorant leftism sounds practically comfy by comparison.

    That and leftist are almost always lying. However, getting outflanked to the left makes them start telling the truth a bit, to try to reign in their own extremism. Nobody genuinely thinks Communism is a good idea, not even Stalin or Pol Pot. They just think saying it’s a good idea might get them political power. And they’re not wrong, are they?

  • Everyone is sort of waiting to pull the trigger on going back on Twitter, because the team was still banning people up until a few hours ago. But we’ve now got a high profile hero returning with an unmolested account. We’ve got many others if we search “I’m back.†Along with making new accounts, people...
  • @Punch Brother Punch
    @emerging majority


    Fetzer as an intel agent? Man, now I’ve heard them all.
    �
    Well, why not? He's ex-military and a University professor. Historically, universities have been targeting grounds for potential operatives.

    Replies: @emerging majority

    After reading Fetzer’s articles in the Duluth Reader, following the assassination of Senator Paul Wellstone and his wife by sabotaging and/or EMPing his airplane just a few days before he would have been returned to the Senate; I realized way back then that Fetzer was totally for real.

    You are just speculating and pilpuling versus an honorable man who pointed out how that plane-crash was engineered by those who demanded that the righteous, universalist Jew was taken out of the picture.

  • It is the opinion of most patriotic voices in Russian alt-media (remember, hardcore Russian patriots are still not allowed on mainstream media in Russia) that while the special operation in Ukraine is all well and good, there is no good explanation for why Ukraine was lost in the first place. How could the Kremlin let...
  • Ace says:
    @Been_there_done_that
    @antibeast


    ...explained by Professor John Mearsheimer...
    �
    This guy is basically a charlatan on European issues. As I have explained in a different thread, his entire narrative and derivative conjectures ("What if Mexico...?") collapse upon serious scrutiny. The content of the agreement between NATO and Russia, signed in 1997 in Paris, two years before its initial eastward expansion, destroys the entire basis of his entire story, which is why he never mentions it, as if it did not exist. His "view" or approach is both antiquated, misleading and fraudulent, therefore irrelevant, and that is much worse than merely being "politically incorrect" (which usually refers to something that is empirically true but inconvenient). He has therefore become the academic darling of Russian propagandists. Western media are too lazy or stupid to bother deconstructing his nonsense, so they prefer to just censor him.

    Replies: @Ace, @antibeast

    So what is in the NATO-Russia Founding Act that undercuts Mearsheimer’s analysis?

    The Act has no impact on NATO enlargement according to the linked fact sheet above. How might this have committed Russia to accept any and all NATO expansion? Maybe that’s not your point, in which I await news from you.

  • Fr0m the New York Times Science section: Anglo-Saxon Kings Made Sure to Eat Their Vegetables, Study Shows Contrary to popular belief, the ruling classes gorged on meat only on rare occasions, according to an analysis of more than 2,000 skeletons buried during medieval times. By Maria Cramer April 29, 2022 Anglo-Saxon kings have long reigned...
  • anonymous[585] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:
    @Anon
    Cheese and milk were often the main source of protein. A typical British meal was the "ploughman's lunch" of watered down beer, bread, and cheese:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ploughman%27s_lunch#History

    Pierce the Ploughman's Crede (c. 1394) mentions the traditional ploughman's meal of bread, cheese, and beer. Bread and cheese formed the basis of the diet of English rural labourers for centuries: skimmed-milk cheese, supplemented with a little lard and butter, was their main source of fats and protein.[4] In the absence of access to expensive seasonings, onions were the "favoured condiment",[5] as well as providing a valuable source of vitamin C.[6]

    The reliance on cheese rather than meat protein was especially strong in the south of the country.[7] As late as the 1870s, farmworkers in Devon were said to eat "bread and hard cheese at 2d. a pound, with cider very washy and sour" for their midday meal.[8] While this diet was associated with rural poverty, it also gained associations with more idealised images of rural life. Anthony Trollope in The Duke's Children has a character comment that "A rural labourer who sits on the ditch-side with his bread and cheese and an onion has more enjoyment out of it than any Lucullus".[9]

    While farm labourers usually carried their food with them to eat in the fields, similar food was for a long time served in public houses as a simple, cheap meal. In 1815, William Cobbett recalled how farmers going to market in Farnham, forty years earlier, would often add "2d. worth of bread and cheese" to the pint of beer they drank at the inn stabling their horses.[10] In the 19th century the English fondness for serving cheese and bread with beer was noted, as "the very dryness and saltness heighten thirst, and therefore the relish of the beer".[11] In the early 20th century, bread and cheese was still the only food available in many rural pubs: in 1932 Martin Armstrong described stopping at village inns for a lunch of bread, cheese and beer, noting that "On these occasions in country inns when bread, cheese and beer seem so extraordinarily good, the alternative is generally nothing; and compared with nothing bread, cheese, and beer are beyond compare".[12]
    �

    Replies: @anonymous

    Smithtown, Long Island has a street named for its 17th-century founder’s lunch. Richard Smith, in the process (according to legend) of riding a bull for a day to delineate the borders of his namesake town, stopped to eat on the path that would become Bread and Cheese Hollow Road. Smith was from a wealthy English family in Southampton (LI, not UK), so was presumably quite accustomed to bread and cheese as a complete meal.

  • The previous Open Thread has well over 1,000 comments and is getting a little sluggish, so here’s a new one for the Karlin Community. Just to kick it off, here are a couple of interviews I'd strongly recommend, one of British Prof. Richard Sakwa on the Grayzone, and the other of Scott Ritter you was...
  • German_reader says:
    @AP
    @German_reader

    Germany has been very slow and helpful mostly under extreme pressure. Not 100% useless but barely and grudgingly helpful, compared to the Eastern Europeans, Anglos, Scandinavians, etc. I remember how at the beginning the arms shipments to Ukraine all had to avoid German airspace, and how Germany was blocking other countries from sending German-made equipment to Ukraine. The German state was probably hoping Ukraine would have been finished off quickly so business as usual could be resumed.

    But Germany is better now. Though even those Gepards aren’t scheduled to be sent for a couple more months IIRC.

    Replies: @German_reader

    I remember how at the beginning the arms shipments to Ukraine all had to avoid German airspace, and how Germany was blocking other countries from sending German-made equipment to Ukraine. The German state was probably hoping Ukraine would have been finished off quickly so business as usual could be resumed.

    That was before the invasion, and the latter part is just speculation. My impression is there was a general expectation Ukraine would fold quickly. US evacuated its diplomats, and all the talk was about supporting a guerrilla movement after a Russian invasion and occupation, not a regular war effort like now.

    Though even those Gepards aren’t scheduled to be sent for a couple more months IIRC.

    That’s true, but apart from political considerations there’s also the simple fact that Germany’s military is in a run-down state, e.g. they’ve got only about 100 of those armoured howitzers 2000. I suppose Germany could spare some, but this will also reduce Germany’s ability even more to react to any contingency.

  • There is technically still some possibility that the Elon Musk deal to purchase Twitter and reinstate freedom of speech could fall through, but this does not appear likely. What appears likely is that he is going to take over the company, and then probably be put in prison a few days or weeks later. However,...
  • @Bro43rd
    @Alrenous

    I was just imagining the line of people trying to get in to your proposed city, miles of traffic. May even lead to some tailgating breaking out.

    Replies: @Alrenous

    Tailgating? Crimes against humanity. Shut it down immediately. Can’t have that.

    Obviously democracy is a literally perfect system and any problem or cost, no matter how minor, is the result of not being democratic enough.

    •ï¿½LOL: Bro43rd
    •ï¿½Replies: @Notsofast
    @Alrenous

    oh my god, it would be like the iraqi highway of death, burned out bar-b-q's stretching for miles. oh the humanity.....
  • From KQED: The opening of the article is overstating many of the changes currently being considered, but that's indicative of which way the wind is blowing. When you abolish the use of admissions tests, as the University of California just did in order to let in more of The Diverse, you are immediately going to...
  • @AnotherDad

    Also, homesickness is a problem, not having your mom and dad around to yell at your can hurt your diligence, freshmen notoriously put on 15 pounds eating cafeteria food...
    �
    I never heard anything about this "freshman 15" until the last twenty years or so.

    When i went to college back in the 70s, this sure did not seem to be the case. (And our cafeteria food, while not gourmet, was perfectly fine. Better, I think, than at my brother's college.) The guys in my freshman dorm, were not suddenly bloating up. And the girls--they were absolutely delicious. (It is eye opening now to just remember back to what young women used to look like. Or see videos from that era--before the big bloat.)

    The "weighty concept" I remember from that era was that when you left college, got a job--drove to work instead of walking, sat at a desk all day and didn't play sports with the guys in the evening--guys would in a few years pack on ten pounds.

    College--young adulthood in general--isn't supposed to be a time "fat time".

    Replies: @Joe862

    It was definitely a thing in the mid-nineties. I had a job that had me in college dorms and the freshman girls’ dorm was full of fat chicks. I mentioned it to a student and the “freshman 15” was an established pattern at that time.

  • The previous Open Thread has passed 800 comments and reportedly getting a little sluggish, so here’s a new one for the Karlin Community. — Ron Unz
  • @Coconuts
    @songbird


    IMO, it must already be having a negative effect on TFR, though it may be hard to quantify, as there are no controls.

    Granted, there are developed countries with less diversity and lower TFR, but that is not a good rebuttal, as those are different societies and not controls on the same timeline.
    �
    From purely anecdotal evidence (myself) it seems possible, I remember when I was living in my grandparents' old house for a while in an area that had become highly multicultural, the lack of any real sense of community was weirdly alienating, it was definitely not somewhere you would think of having or raising a family.

    Like an extreme case of what De Tocqueville writes about here:

    'Aristocracy links everybody, from peasant to king, in one long chain. Democracy breaks the chain and frees each link… Thus, not only does democracy make men forget their ancestors, but also clouds their view of their descendants and isolates them from their contemporaries. Each man is forever thrown back upon himself alone and there is a danger that he may be shut up in the solitude of his own heart. '
    �
    I was talking to someone (Polish but their children were born in the UK) who has a teenage daughter at school, and they mentioned the obvious impact of the new teaching about white privilege and racism. Decolonisation in education is supposed to involve an intensification of this, when you combine it with ambient anti-natal feminism and the pre-existing low fertility culture (German_reader was writing about it in his replies above), it wouldn't be surprising to see further falls in TFR in the futures.

    The part about different countries being in different situations I think is true; I noticed in Belarus an important reason for lower fertility in cities was low income and lack of living space, when for women my own age having 2 or 3 children was still a goal or aspiration. I recall being quite stunned when my wife told me not long after I got to know her that 'having children is a duty to the Motherland', and there was no irony intended.

    Replies: @songbird, @Dmitry, @Philip Owen

    Low fertility is the result of the banks offering mortgages based on two incomes. First the greedy took them up. Then everycouple had to have two incomes to afford the same house that one bought before. Eventually houses got bigger but not so much and now there are now children and no one to make them homes.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Philip Owen

    This is anti Semitic gibberish Phillip. Low Fertility is a result of liberated free thinking citizens. Lol.

    Low Fertility is characteristic of irreligious literate white women with higher education diplomas and degrees. It’s showing up in Japan and Korea too but these two states have birth rates that are outliers even in Asia.

    Perhaps this is something bankers, meaning Jews, are happy to see in white countries? I think so. Makes flooding the zone with Africans easier. After all who else will pay your pension Mr Owen…
  • The Washington Post jumps on a new study of the genes and behaviors of thousands of dogs as opening another front in The War on Stereotypes: Looking for a well-behaved dog? Breed may not tell you much. Researchers found that breed alone explains very little about dog behavior and personality By Katie Shepherd Yesterday at...
  • @Cloudbuster
    @Dieter Kief

    Is that postman's route in a high income or low income area? Urban or rural? Black or White population?

    Replies: @Dieter Kief

    White. Middle class. Some migrants from Italy and Turkey – Hockenheim (20 000 inhabitants), where the F-1 race track is situated in Badenia/ southern Germany. Near Heidelberg.

    •ï¿½Thanks: Cloudbuster
  • The previous Open Thread has well over 1,000 comments and is getting a little sluggish, so here’s a new one for the Karlin Community. Just to kick it off, here are a couple of interviews I'd strongly recommend, one of British Prof. Richard Sakwa on the Grayzone, and the other of Scott Ritter you was...
  • Interesting thread, especially about the economic effects of the Black sea blockade:

  • There are two popular clips going around on social media this week of Russians talking about the inevitability of nuclear war. They are both from Russia 1, which is state television. Remember that RT is also Russian state media, and not really very well-edited, in terms of promoting a consistent agenda, so given the “shrugâ€...
  • @azureamaranthine
    @Anonymous

    You're mistaken. Russia would more than likely beat us in a conventional war at this point. You don't understand the depth of the rot in our troops.

    Replies: @Ultrafart the Brave

    You’re mistaken. Russia would more than likely beat us in a conventional war at this point.

    Agreed. It’s not a stretch to speculate that Russia already has full spectrum military dominance in any prospective conflict – especially if China is also factored into the equation.

    Moreover, I believe the original commenter was also wrong about Russia’s capacity to compete economically with the USA (again, especially with China also factored in). Case in point, Russia is already shrugging off the combined economic attack of the Western world right now, and it’s the Empire that is in the process of crumbling – not Russia.

  • The previous Open Thread has well over 1,000 comments and is getting a little sluggish, so here’s a new one for the Karlin Community. Just to kick it off, here are a couple of interviews I'd strongly recommend, one of British Prof. Richard Sakwa on the Grayzone, and the other of Scott Ritter you was...
  • @German_reader
    @AP


    It’s a very rare opportunity, perhaps once in a generation, to cheaply degrade the military of a major rival.
    �
    I admit there's a certain logic to that and I won't pretend to be sad that so many Russians have been killed in Ukraine. However, I disagree with the idea of keeping the war going just to weaken Russia. If (and of course that's a big if, who knows what's going on in Putin's head by now) there's a chance to reach a negotiated settlement which leaves Ukraine in full sovereignty over the territory it held before February, one should pursue it.
    I also don't think that Russia has been purely hostile towards the West over the last 20 years, on some issues like Afghanistan/Islamists in Central Asia or the nuclear issue with Iran there was at least some constructive cooperation. Of course the chance for such cooperation may be irreversibly gone now, but from my pov that isn't a positive development.

    If Russia stumbles so hard that Ukraine is able to take more than it had in February, such is the price of invasion.
    �
    If we lived in a world without nuclear weapons, one could view it like that with equanimity, but I'm unwilling to dismiss the risk of a defeated Putin retaliating with nuclear weapons and taking much of the West down with him.

    But if Russia somehow destroys its military so much that it can’t stop Ukraine from moving further, even without future Western support, well it’s an unintended consequence of its own choice to invade.
    �
    Ok, if you phrase it like that... But all that is hypothetical for now anyway.

    Ukraine’s decision to go independent sealed the doom of the USSR
    �
    tbh I don't see why that should matter much to most Europeans or Americans, by then Germany had been re-unified and the Soviets had already allowed Poles, Czechs and other Warsaw Pact members to go their own way.

    You really think Ukraine’s engineers and scientists would never have been able to make those nukes usable for Ukraine? Or to make their own nukes after not having signed a nonproliferation agreement?
    �
    Given Ukraine's economic and other internal problems this doesn't strike me as a realistic possibility.
    See here:
    https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0043820016673777

    Moreover, establishing operational control over the existing missiles on Ukraine’s territory still would have left Ukraine with a problem of how to replace them once their service life expired, as Ukraine lacked some of the key elements of a nuclear weapons program. These elements included uranium enrichment and plutonium reprocessing facilities to fabricate nuclear fuel, as well as nuclear warhead production and nuclear—and missile—testing ranges. This is not even to mention the more sophisticated elements essential for making Ukraine’s deterrent against Russia’s giant nuclear forces survivable and credible, such as the early warning system, the geodetic data from satellites necessary for accurate targeting, as well as extensive research, production, and maintenance facilities necessary for ongoing nuclear force modernization (for a more detailed discussion see Kincade 1993).

    Thus, after bringing upon itself the wrath of the civilized world, and possibly a retaliatory action from Russia, Ukraine would still need to invest heavily in a nuclear weapons program, the cost of which the Ukrainian government estimated at a minimum of $2 billion. Those who remember the early 1990s in Ukraine will agree that, for a country ravaged by hyperinflation and the severe economic crisis of a post-Soviet transition, such an investment would have been prohibitive. Indeed, some in Russia thought that American insistence on Ukraine’s quick denuclearization was misguided. For instance, Vitaliy Kataev, a senior representative of the Soviet, then Russian, military industrial complex, argued that Ukraine should be left alone with its ICBMs and made to carry the cost of maintaining and eventually disposing of them as their service life expired toward the end of the 1990s (Kataev 1994, 3). By that time, he maintained, Ukrainians would come begging that Russia and the West take these missiles off their hands.
    �
    Also here:
    https://nucleardiner.wordpress.com/2022/02/06/could-ukraine-have-retained-soviet-nuclear-weapons/

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    If we lived in a world without nuclear weapons, one could view it like that with equanimity, but I’m unwilling to dismiss the risk of a defeated Putin retaliating with nuclear weapons and taking much of the West down with him.

    It’s a long ways to go to get to this point, and if the Ukrainian military were really to push the Russians this far back, I think somebody else in Russia would need to start looking at eliminating Putin. Things would go much more smoothly on Russia at any negotiating table without Putin around. If the war goes another 4-6 months, Russia’s economy will really start to feel all of the negative effects of the economic sanctions, it will become really messed up.

    •ï¿½Replies: @German_reader
    @Mr. Hack


    Things would go much more smoothly on Russia at any negotiating table without Putin around.
    �
    Problem is that Putin seems to be a true autocrat, much more powerful (at least domestically) than the rulers of the Soviet Union after Stalin. There doesn't seem to be any institution capable of sending him off to retirement like happened with Khrushchev. Which is of course pretty scary, because he might be genuinely unhinged by now if he really believes what he's saying.

    Replies: @A123
  • Economist and geopolitical analyst Peter Koenig discusses his recent articles “Ukraine-Russia: Towards a “Hot Warâ€? Advancing the Agenda of the Great Reset?â€, “The World Health Tyranny: Towards the WEF “Great Reset of Miseryâ€, and “The Shanghai Lockdown. Seen from Another Angle.†Peter Koenig writes: “Russia intervened in Ukraine on 24 February 2022. Since then, all...
  • Jerry Alatalo says: •ï¿½Website

    Things for humanity to do TODAY:

    1. Investigate COVID-19….

    2. Prosecute those who become identified as behind the crimes against humanity deception….

    3. Punish those found guilty of premeditated mass murder to the fullest extent of the law, in a public manner to such an extent that future equally criminally-insane individuals will never attempt such an immeasurably destructive, murderous, cruel and ruthless covert operation ever again.

    Peace.

  • From a UK.gov website: From the BBC in 2012: Britain's showmen: All the fun of the fair? By Emma Kasprzak BBC News Published12 April 2012 As the travelling fair season begins, fairground workers from all over Britain are heading out on to the road. But while their presence is familiar, what do we really know...
  • @James N. Kennett
    Notice the absence of the word "English" in the categories. The Scottish Nationalist Party which now runs Scotland is of course strongly anti-English.

    Scottish Nationalists believe the not entirely false view that Scotland suffered from English hegemony in Britain. This belief has made them not anti-hegemony - they are true believers in the EU - but anti-English. This exemplifies the fact that people think ethnically.

    Replies: @AnotherDad

    Scottish Nationalists believe the not entirely false view that Scotland suffered from English hegemony in Britain. This belief has made them not anti-hegemony – they are true believers in the EU – but anti-English. This exemplifies the fact that people think ethnically.

    When I first heard of them I thought “Scottish nationalists? I suppose they want to keep Scotland from going down the tubes with England and preserve it for the Scots. Cool. Good for them.” Then I read a bit about them. LOL.

    An actual Scottish nationalist should sue them for false advertising. These clowns–the clownette in charge–want more immigration to Scotland. They want to destroy Scotland faster.

    Truth in labelling they would be called SAG–Scottish Anti-English Globohomo.

    •ï¿½Agree: James N. Kennett
    •ï¿½Replies: @James N. Kennett
    @AnotherDad


    These clowns–the clownette in charge–want more immigration to Scotland.
    �
    Funniest of all, the list of countries from which they want immigration does not include England - despite the fact that the English are the nationality most assimilable to Scotland.

    Replies: @Anonymous
  • The previous Open Thread has well over 1,000 comments and is getting a little sluggish, so here’s a new one for the Karlin Community. Just to kick it off, here are a couple of interviews I'd strongly recommend, one of British Prof. Richard Sakwa on the Grayzone, and the other of Scott Ritter you was...
  • AP says:
    @German_reader
    @AP


    and the German state
    �
    Germany sent Stinger missiles and anti-tank weapons almost immediately after the invasion.
    Apparently things like this as well:
    https://twitter.com/UAWeapons/status/1518681654562369544
    They've also sent Patriot batteries to Slovakia, so Slovakia will send its S-300 system to Ukraine, and similar arrangements are planned with Slovenia and T-72-like tanks. And now they're even intending to send German Gepard anti-air tanks to Ukraine.
    imo this entire "Germany isn't supporting Ukraine at all, yet financing Russia's war" narrative is nothing more than a fairly cynical media campaign.

    Replies: @AP

    Germany has been very slow and helpful mostly under extreme pressure. Not 100% useless but barely and grudgingly helpful, compared to the Eastern Europeans, Anglos, Scandinavians, etc. I remember how at the beginning the arms shipments to Ukraine all had to avoid German airspace, and how Germany was blocking other countries from sending German-made equipment to Ukraine. The German state was probably hoping Ukraine would have been finished off quickly so business as usual could be resumed.

    But Germany is better now. Though even those Gepards aren’t scheduled to be sent for a couple more months IIRC.

    •ï¿½Replies: @German_reader
    @AP


    I remember how at the beginning the arms shipments to Ukraine all had to avoid German airspace, and how Germany was blocking other countries from sending German-made equipment to Ukraine. The German state was probably hoping Ukraine would have been finished off quickly so business as usual could be resumed.
    �
    That was before the invasion, and the latter part is just speculation. My impression is there was a general expectation Ukraine would fold quickly. US evacuated its diplomats, and all the talk was about supporting a guerrilla movement after a Russian invasion and occupation, not a regular war effort like now.

    Though even those Gepards aren’t scheduled to be sent for a couple more months IIRC.
    �
    That's true, but apart from political considerations there's also the simple fact that Germany's military is in a run-down state, e.g. they've got only about 100 of those armoured howitzers 2000. I suppose Germany could spare some, but this will also reduce Germany's ability even more to react to any contingency.
  • This video is available on Rumble. Elon Musk has bought Twitter and lefties are terrified because Mr. Musk calls himself a “free speech absolutist.†Nothing scares the Left more than letting everyone talk. “The NAACP calls for Musk to keep Trump off Twitter.†It said that if he returns, “lives are at risk, and so...
  • Realist says:
    @HdC
    @Realist

    Certainly I have ideas; withdrawing one's labours being the most powerful idea I can think of in a capitalist economy ie. the western world. This is what I mean by "acceptable way" because it is legal and powerful.

    I stated that this was not likely to happen because 50% of the workers live from pay check to pay check.

    Another idea that may be worth pursuing is to write a letter to your representative that lists your concerns. In its conclusion simply state that unless your concerns are addressed in a meaningful way, you will contribute and volunteer for one of the opposing candidates.

    This method is imminently scale-able and, who knows, may catch on.

    What ideas do you have, one that won't get you killed or put into prison?

    Replies: @Realist

    Certainly I have ideas; withdrawing one’s labours being the most powerful idea I can think of in a capitalist economy ie. the western world. This is what I mean by “acceptable way†because it is legal and powerful.

    I stated that this was not likely to happen because 50% of the workers live from pay check to pay check.

    So that idea is useless.

    Another idea that may be worth pursuing is to write a letter to your representative that lists your concerns. In its conclusion simply state that unless your concerns are addressed in a meaningful way, you will contribute and volunteer for one of the opposing candidates.

    In no way will the electoral system play a part in the salvation of this country.

    What ideas do you have, one that won’t get you killed or put into prison?

    I’m in my upper seventies…I’m not going to do anything…except laugh at the dumb bastards that think voting will solve anything. Here is a hint the solution may well get many killed or put into prison…it depends on how far the Deep State wants to take it.

    If there are not enough people in this country willing to die or be put in prison to save this country…then so be it.

    •ï¿½Replies: @HdC
    @Realist

    Sounds like you and I are of a similar age, and you are not prepared to do anything, but advocate that others should be prepared to die or be imprisoned to save your country. Nice.

    I am not prepared to die or go to prison, nor do I advocate that anyone else do so, to save my country.

    What I do advocate is that during elections the voters contribute to and volunteer in the election campaign of INDEPENDENT candidates, ie. candidates without any political party affiliation!

    If the majority of elected representatives were independents, the government would be paralyzed and unable to pass any more destructive laws or increase taxation. Sounds perfect to me. It would force extensive debate on every issue before the representatives and, perhaps, increased coverage by the media.

    I can imagine these debates to deteriorate into very noisy and perhaps kinetic occurrences, perhaps to such an extent that its entertainment value exceeds anything the media has to offer.

    Replies: @Realist
    , @Bro43rd
    @Realist

    Realist says,
    "Here is a hint the solution may well get many killed or put into prison…it depends on how far the Deep State wants to take it." & "If there are not enough people in this country willing to die or be put in prison to save this country…then so be it."

    That would be advocating for other people to die or go to prison, imho. I can't quite figure you out realist. A "patriot" who believes in revolution ala 1776, a leftist out trolling the UR commentariat, or deepstate agent provocateur. Or something else......
  • The previous Open Thread has well over 1,000 comments and is getting a little sluggish, so here’s a new one for the Karlin Community. Just to kick it off, here are a couple of interviews I'd strongly recommend, one of British Prof. Richard Sakwa on the Grayzone, and the other of Scott Ritter you was...
  • @AP
    @German_reader


    Justice is in a factor in international relations now?
    �
    It should be, and arming Ukraine in order to punish a bloody invasion is just. It also happens to be convenient for the West. A cheap javelin or stinger taking out an expensive Russian helicopter or tank is a good return on investment. It's a very rare opportunity, perhaps once in a generation, to cheaply degrade the military of a major rival. So it's a rare case when justice and American interests coincide (World War II was another case; most other wars such as World War I were not).

    What isn’t sensible is going for ever more extreme aims like sending Putin to The Hague, permanently destroying Russia as a geopolitical factor and making any settlement conditional on Ukraine’s pre-2014 territorial integrity.
    �
    I don't disagree. But who knows what the consequences of Russia's crime will be. If Russia stumbles so hard that Ukraine is able to take more than it had in February, such is the price of invasion.*

    If as a result Ukraine gets armed so well and Russia’s military gets degraded so much that Ukraine makes further gains into its internationally recognized territory (including Crimea and Donbas)

    Hard no. If Western policy-makers have even an ounce of sense left, they’ll tell Ukraine not to even try anything regarding Crimea and threaten withdrawal of support if Ukraine still does so
    �
    Again, I don't disagree. Ukraine should be maximally supported as long as Russia is in its territory and until it is able to throw the Russians out of the February borders, for its own sake as well as for the sake of peace. But if Russia somehow destroys its military so much that it can't stop Ukraine from moving further, even without future Western support, well it's an unintended consequence of its own choice to invade. *

    Ukraine helped end the USSR and got rid of its huge nuclear stockpile.

    That’s laughable bs, and you know it. The only thing that mattered were Gorbashev’s decisions, and
    �
    Ukraine's decision to go independent sealed the doom of the USSR (just as Polish stubbornness helped end the Warsaw Pact).

    Ukraine couldn’t have used the nukes it had anyway, so giving them up wasn’t a meaningful sacrifice.
    �
    You really think Ukraine's engineers and scientists would never have been able to make those nukes usable for Ukraine? Or to make their own nukes after not having signed a nonproliferation agreement?

    *Just to be clear, I think the possibility of this happening is very unlikely, though not completely impossible

    Replies: @German_reader, @utu, @Mr. Hack

    Great reply! For a moment, I thought that I was reading a reply that I had wrote. 🙂 You really took off the gloves for this reply, and of all people it had to be German_ Reader (a commenter that we both respect here) that was on the opposing end. The exploits of the Ukrainian military must be inspiring you.

    •ï¿½Thanks: AP
    •ï¿½LOL: Mikhail
  • The good news we've learned since Russian invaded Ukraine back on February 24 is that Russia is militarily weaker than most people expected. The future is unwritten, so this could change with time. After all, the Red Army that invaded Finland in November 1939 was a lot less competent than the Red Army that invaded...
  • John Frank says: •ï¿½Website
    @obwandiyag
    So far the Russian Army has used for its special military operation in Ukraine:
    _ 12% of its soldiers (total includes trained draftees)
    _ 10% of its fighter jets
    _ 7% of its tanks
    _ 5% of its missiles
    _ 4% of its artillery
    And keeps advancing on a daily basis

    Replies: @John Frank

    Russia has lost more men in a month than in the entire 20 year period the US was in Afghanistan. They have lost least a half dozen high ranking generals—unheard of for a professional military. They lost their flagship sea vessel. And the most important signal that things are going badly is that Putin and his acolytes are talking about using nukes more frequently every week.

  • It is the opinion of most patriotic voices in Russian alt-media (remember, hardcore Russian patriots are still not allowed on mainstream media in Russia) that while the special operation in Ukraine is all well and good, there is no good explanation for why Ukraine was lost in the first place. How could the Kremlin let...
  • @Notsofast
    ukraine was always in the playbook of the pnac zioneocons, this has been in the works years before richard luger and his houseboy showed up to "secure" the bioweapons labs. after the initial failed color revolution, perhaps the russians let their guard down a little, feeling they could undo any hamhanded neocon coup.

    perhaps covid opened putin's eyes to the true intent of the 30 bioweapon labs ringing the country. half the people in lpr and dpr held russian passports and can freely travel to russia, providing the nato spooks an easy means of spreading their bioweapons into russia. russia really had no choice at that point but to intervene militarily or face an unending series of bioweapons attacks designed to specifically target genetic russians, as these neocon demons and their nato minions had an unlimited supply of slavic human guniea pigs to experiment on.

    as i have said before, neocons are not stupid just dispicabaly evil. they left the russians in a damned if you you and damned if you don't position, baiting the bear into what seems an undefendable position. i have also said that putin and the russians are not stupid and understood all of this before undertaking this terrible task of securing their boarders and people and while it may seem they have been outclassed in the western propaganda war, imho i think they just don't care about western propaganda and have their people overwhelmingly behind their effort, as truth is the best propaganda, pravda.

    Replies: @Levtraro, @annamaria

    The US Zionists’ dearest: “Declassification of documents exposing Banderite crimes”
    https://www.voltairenet.org/article216718.html

    The Russian government has declassified documents relating to the trials of banderites at the end of the Great Patriotic War (World War II).

    These documents bring light to the atrocious war crimes perpetrated by the banderites against Ukrainian civilians, in 1944 and 1945, during the retreat of the Nazis faced with the advancing Soviet Army. In particular, a document from the ministry devoted to the eastern territories occupied by the Third Reich, headed by Alfred Rosenberg, uncovers a plan for the complete annihilation of the Donbass and its population by Nazi forces and their Banderite collaborators.

    These events were ignored in present-day Ukraine. Indeed, since the end of the Second World War, the Banderites and the Nazis of the Anti-Bolshevik Bloc of Nations (ABN) have patiently rewritten the history of their country. Out of any reality, their version has become the current Holy Bible of the Ukrainians.

    The ABN documents can be accessed on our site:
    ABN Correspondence (en anglais) 1950-2000 https://www.voltairenet.org not /article216616.html
    ABN Korrespondenz (en allemand) 1949-55
    Ukrainian Quarterly (en anglais) 1944-85 https://www.voltairenet.org/article216622.html
    Please send us any other documents that you might have.

    The history of Banderites’s artrocities in Poland: https://justice4poland.com/2016/09/30/unthinkable-atrocities-of-banderites-which-the-polish-will-never-forget-18/

    Polish website had collected 362 different examples of torture and brutality used by the “heroes of Ukraine†in the early 40’s of the last century against the Poles. Of course, all of these were used against the Russians, and in general against all who did not share the ideas of Bandera and refused to become an accomplice to the Nazi occupiers. But the Poles did a great job restoring the historical facts about the atrocities of the bad people from the UPA.

    “There are no words to describe in just a few sentences the crimes committed by Ukrainian Nazis against the Poles in 1939-1947. The hatred that fuelled the killers, who would use such horrible methods to kill their victims, does not fit into human understanding.

    Below is the result of years of research by Alexander Korman, who described 362 methods of physical and psychological torture inflicted by terrorists on the Poles by the OUN and the UPA… There were 39 methods of torture for small children alone.

    Some pedigree:

    https://www.voltairenet.org/article216622.html

    •ï¿½Thanks: Notsofast
    •ï¿½Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
    @annamaria

    And these MONSTERS, and similar Croats, Slovenes, Belarussians, Balts etc, were made welcome in Austfailia after the war, were hailed as members of 'Captive Nations', built memorials to Bandera et al as 'heroes', inculcated this demonic hatred in their spawn, entered local politics as a force for hard Right Evil, and were maintained by the USA and Five Eyes until they could return to wreak horror and terror on their victims, again.
    On a side point, yesterday being the anniversary of the liberation of Vietnam, a motley crew of aged pimps, madams, death-squad goons and other 'human' detritus, assembled outside the Vietnam Embassy here, declaring their desire to see that Government overturned. Waving the flag of the 'South' Vietnam death-squad regime. So the Evil never, ever, rests. While most local Vietnamese happily accept history, traveling to and from Vietnam to see relatives and holiday, as ever there is a hard-core of fascist thugs, loyal to and supported by the Great Satan in Thanatopolis DC, and his minions, like the failed society that once was Australia.

    Replies: @JR Foley
  • It is now clear that today’s escalation of the New Cold War was planned over a year ago, with serious strategy associated with America’s plan to block Nord Stream 2 as part of its aim of blocking Western Europe (“NATOâ€) from seeking prosperity by mutual trade and investment with China and Russia. As President Biden...
  • FKA Max says: •ï¿½Website
    @mulga mumblebrain
    @FKA Max

    Yes, indeed-a truly vicious, and ludicrously self-deluded racist imbecile. Homo westernensis in its death throes. Do you really believe this tripe? I bet you do. How much you must HATE being outdone by short-sighted 'gooks', 'chinks', 'slopes', ' yellow devils' etc. Mind you, you're plainly a poor specimen of the 'superior' Western type.

    Replies: @FKA Max

    Do you really believe this tripe? I bet you do. How much you must HATE being outdone by short-sighted

    It’s about selection pressures. The Chinese have been selecting for certain traits for millennia, recommended reading ( Click MORE tag, I participated in the discussion in that comments thread here https://www.unz.com/runz/how-social-darwinism-made-modern-china-248/?showcomments#comment-1866207 ):

    How Social Darwinism Made Modern China
    Ron Unz • The American Conservative • March 11, 2013

    [MORE]

    https://www.unz.com/runz/how-social-darwinism-made-modern-china-248/

    The social importance of competitive examinations was enormous, playing the same role in determining membership in the ruling elite that the aristocratic bloodlines of Europe’s nobility did until modern times, and this system embedded itself just as deeply in the popular culture.
    […]
    With Chinese civilization having spent most of the past 1,500 years allocating its positions of national power and influence by examination, there has sometimes been speculation that test-taking ability has become embedded in the Chinese people at the biological as well as cultural level. Yet although there might be an element of truth to this, it hardly seems likely to be significant.
    […]
    The cultural impact of rule by a test-selected elite was enormous, but the direct genetic impact would have been negligible.

    This Social Darwinism selection pressure/priority resulted in a more Patrilineal/Fraternal structure and organization of society in China and most of the rest of the world, than in Europe (which is very unique, not the global/human norm, and WEIRD as already https://www.unz.com/article/the-aryan-ideal-from-ben-franklin-to-national-socialism/?showcomments#comment-5303818 pointed out):
    The First Political Order: How Sex Shapes Governance and National Security Worldwide
    https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7312/huds19466 or https://archive.ph/O0fdf

    The Patrilineal/Fraternal Syndrome we have described, so ubiquitous throughout recorded human history, is alive and well today. In many nations, reliance on male-bonded kin groups for security remains the norm. Indeed, nations might be placed along a spectrum according to how important this security provision mechanism remains, or as Mark Weiner notes, clan societies “range from stateless societies known as ‘segmentary lineage systems’ to modern societies in which a weak state has difficulty containing the forces of clannism. In some circumstances, they even exist in developed, centralized states.


    Source: https://www.womanstats.org/

  • There are two popular clips going around on social media this week of Russians talking about the inevitability of nuclear war. They are both from Russia 1, which is state television. Remember that RT is also Russian state media, and not really very well-edited, in terms of promoting a consistent agenda, so given the “shrugâ€...
  • Hey. Biden’s gotta get those poll numbers up somehow. If the war’s all Russia’s fault…

  • The previous Open Thread has well over 1,000 comments and is getting a little sluggish, so here’s a new one for the Karlin Community. Just to kick it off, here are a couple of interviews I'd strongly recommend, one of British Prof. Richard Sakwa on the Grayzone, and the other of Scott Ritter you was...
  • A123 says: •ï¿½Website
    @Pixo
    @Yellowface Anon

    I believe the official EU actions against Russia are minimal and it is the national-level sanctions that go much further.

    Replies: @A123, @Yellowface Anon

    I believe the official EU actions against Russia are minimal and it is the national-level sanctions that go much further.

    As a general rule, it is the reverse. The EU ‘sanctions’ are extreme but unenforceable. The bulk of Europe is quietly ignoring or openly repudiating EU overreach.

    There are individual nations (e.g. Germany, Poland) working against European norms. They have more extreme policy than even the anti-European EU. However, it is focused on quashing internal actors.

    PEACE 😇

  • There are two popular clips going around on social media this week of Russians talking about the inevitability of nuclear war. They are both from Russia 1, which is state television. Remember that RT is also Russian state media, and not really very well-edited, in terms of promoting a consistent agenda, so given the “shrugâ€...
  • For the record, there is zero evidence or reason to believe that a nuclear war would “kill everyone on earth.â€

    There are plenty of folks inside the Beltway who think the US can win a nuclear war with both China and Russia with a “bolt out of the blue†first strike. More than a few of them own property in Uruguay.

  • It is the opinion of most patriotic voices in Russian alt-media (remember, hardcore Russian patriots are still not allowed on mainstream media in Russia) that while the special operation in Ukraine is all well and good, there is no good explanation for why Ukraine was lost in the first place. How could the Kremlin let...
  • He’s trolling, but still:

    Video Link
    Now, some Putintards would, probably, think: “well, when YOU are so smart/smug/whatever, why don’t YOU say what would YOU advise RF top decision makers if asked the same question”.
    Here it is: “Glad you’ve asked. I’d say I don’t know now. Had you asked me that very question in November last year I would’ve had a lot to say, of course. Not anymore, I am afraid.
    I am more than content to simply watch this debacle keeping unfolding. For one reason only: maybe, just maybe, the kleptocracy in Kremlin gets replaced by something better.”

    •ï¿½Troll: emerging majority
  • From KQED: The opening of the article is overstating many of the changes currently being considered, but that's indicative of which way the wind is blowing. When you abolish the use of admissions tests, as the University of California just did in order to let in more of The Diverse, you are immediately going to...
  • @JimDandy
    I don't see what's so hard to understand. Nothing should be a meritocracy. Except for certain sports.

    Replies: @gabon 45, @Badger Down

    Sports too. Why should the fastest runner get the gold?

  • Adapted from the latest Radio Derb, available exclusively at VDARE.com [Videos and transcripts from the first VDARE.com Conference will be posted over the next few days]. Last week I promised you a report on the first VDARE.com conference at our castle in beautiful West Virginia, so here it is. A warning: I'm going to gush....
  • Anonymous[637] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:

    Our country, our beloved country, is in a sorry state. Illiterate Third World opportunists are being waved in across our borders

    Two old limey interlopers sitting in a castle in Appalachia bitching about indigenous Americans coming “across our bordersâ€. Is there a more despicable people than the English?? I can’t wait for Putin to nuke London!

    •ï¿½Replies: @Anonymous
    @Anonymous

    > "indigenous Americans coming 'across our borders'.â€

    "Indigenous Americans" = Injuns with feathers, not dots.

    They should all vamoose back home and emulate their mexi-ancestors by butchering 10,000 of each other over long weekends to please Mr. Sun.

    We don't need no steenking, squat, boxy moochers with their 5 kids de rigueur loud-yammering on buses and in stores.

    Will AOC still grok them...the millions of illiterate Aztecs...when they end up selling burritos (their main skill in our hi-tech era) on sidewalks, resulting in consumers' farts heating up Ma Earth?

    How long before Paco and Juanita, unable to make ends meet by taco-making, leaf-blowing, and floor-cleaning, join fellow face-tatted brownian cholos in gangs?

    November will come and go, Democrats again winning...due to illegals voting, ballots being stuffed, and other ruses. America will then be officially kaput. Republicans will never again win high office.

    When that happens, will Trump, Gaetz, McConnell, Graham, Jordan, Gowdy, and other Republican do-nothing/"hearings"-addicted buffoons admit they could-should have ACTED when there was ample time, but didn't?

    Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
  • The good news we've learned since Russian invaded Ukraine back on February 24 is that Russia is militarily weaker than most people expected. The future is unwritten, so this could change with time. After all, the Red Army that invaded Finland in November 1939 was a lot less competent than the Red Army that invaded...
  • @PhysicistDave
    Steve,

    Russia is slowly but surely taking one town after another in the Donbass and the South.

    They have knocked out the transport structure to resupply the Kievan troops in those areas.

    The only real question is: does this settle in to a cold war in which Russia controls the South and East indefinitely but Kiev keeps launching terror attacks as they have been doing for the last eight years OR does Kiev sue for peace, agree to independence for the South and East and agree not to join NATO (in exchange for Russia agreeing to Kiev joining the EU).

    Unfortunately, that may no longer be Kiev's choice.

    As Lloyd Austin admitted a few days ago, Washington's real aim here is not to save Ukraine but to weaken Putin.

    And so hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians may die pointlessly so that the neocons can pursue their Great Game.

    Unless and until we American remember that we are citizens of a republic and overthrow what you yourself have dubbed the "Deep State."

    The land of the free and the home of the brave? Is it still?

    Replies: @HA, @Verymuchalive, @John Frank

    It is entirely the Ukrainian government choice as to whether they want to keep fighting. They are highly motivated to do it; remember, everyone, including the Biden administration, expected them to fold within days of the invasion. I don’t expect them to “sue for peace” anytime soon.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Anonymous
    @John Frank

    Yes, everybody (evidently including Moscow) believed they would just fold without a fight like happened in 2014. We now mock Putin for failing to predict this, but in fact all Western governments had exactly the same low expectations of the Ukrainians.

    Replies: @HA
    , @PhysicistDave
    @John Frank

    John Frank wrote to me:

    It is entirely the Ukrainian government choice as to whether they want to keep fighting. They are highly motivated to do it; remember, everyone, including the Biden administration, expected them to fold within days of the invasion. I don’t expect them to “sue for peace†anytime soon.
    �
    Unfortunately, neither do I.

    However, Ukraine cannot defeat Russia militarily. Russia has air dominance and can just keep doing to any place in Ukraine what they did to Mariupol -- indeed, they can do far worse.

    They can do to Ukraine's cities what the Allies did to Dresden.

    Is it possible that Ukraine can bleed Russia long enough that Russia just decides it is not worth it -- as happened to the US in Vietnam and Afghanistan -- even though Russia is not actually defeated on the battlefield? Maybe, though I am doubtful.

    How many Ukrainians will die then? Hundreds of thousands. At least.

    Zelensky ran on a platform of easing up in the Donbass and detente with Russia. That is not what he has done.

    I do not think the "killing fields" is what the Ukrainians want.

    But since Zelensky has outlawed the leading opposition party, it's kinda hard to know, isn't it?
  • Fr0m the New York Times Science section: Anglo-Saxon Kings Made Sure to Eat Their Vegetables, Study Shows Contrary to popular belief, the ruling classes gorged on meat only on rare occasions, according to an analysis of more than 2,000 skeletons buried during medieval times. By Maria Cramer April 29, 2022 Anglo-Saxon kings have long reigned...
  • @Intelligent Dasein
    @Twinkie

    Garbage.

    Twinkie is, as usual, completely full of shit. As is typical of his oeuvre, he presents the effluent of a mind formed by skimming waspy, whiggish college textbooks (Palmer and Colton) and regurgitates them in a manner calculated to preach to the HBD choir, which evidently passes for deep wisdom around here.

    In reality, food of all kinds (including meat) was quite abundant in the Middle Ages---so abundant, in fact, that relatively simple innovations aimed at increasing yields (such as grain cradles) were not introduced until a very late date (the 19th century, in this case). This was because, absent the demands for efficiency budding from the industrial mindset, there was no need to go after every last grain of wheat or stalk of straw, nor was there any profit in it. The medieval peasant regarded a wheat field much in the same way that a home gardener today regards his strawberry patch, casually picking the ripest and reddest berries for his own use and leaving the rest to the birds. This is evidenced by the fact that medieval harvesting methods shattered a lot of seedheads and left a lot of grain on the ground, such that the poor gleaners were permitted to go in behind the harvesters and gain enough for their subsistence. Given the evident skill of medieval laborers in other areas, this could not be attributed to ignorance or carelessness. The builders of cathedrals could have applied their technique to farm implements had it been necessary. They didn't, because it wasn't.

    But apart from these quotidian considerations, the more interesting question here is why the partisans of all sides seem to pounce on these worthless studies in order to validate something about their modern worldview. The past has attained a high degree of symbolic importance and must be made to conform to our heart's desires. What is the meaning of all this? How did the past become a woman, and why are her suitors so "beta"?

    Replies: @HA, @AnotherDad

    The medieval peasant regarded a wheat field much in the same way that a home gardener today regards his strawberry patch, casually picking the ripest and reddest berries for his own use and leaving the rest to the birds.

    Fortunately for us, the intelligent and conscientious peasants made the most of their fields, had more food–than the stupid and lazy–left behind more surviving children, who generally found more intelligent and conscientious mates … and hence created the European race that built the glories of Western civilization, including mathematics and modern science. (Which intelligent Europeans–e.g. Thomas Malthus–could use to build mathematical models to explain what they saw around them.)

  • From KQED: The opening of the article is overstating many of the changes currently being considered, but that's indicative of which way the wind is blowing. When you abolish the use of admissions tests, as the University of California just did in order to let in more of The Diverse, you are immediately going to...
  • @HammerJack

    Other times, it may mean allowing students to choose which assignments get the most weight in determining their grade.
    �
    And still other times, it may just mean allowing students to choose what grade they want. See? We kept letter grades! Only better!

    Incidentally, also today (WSJ editorial) :

    Americans for Merit-Based Admissions
    Poll respondents say academic achievement matters more than race.
    https://archive.ph/LRDvl
    �
    It's those pesky pew people again.

    Replies: @Badger Down

    At least they are teaching the students Catch 22:
    You need a math degree to be able to choose which assignments get the most weight.
    But you can’t get a math degree unless you choose which assignments get the most weight.

  • the power if grading scales is that it enables one to pace some kind of measure on the work so that a student knows or has some idea what will be required to improve should they need to do so

    it enables less endowed students to work harder

    it also aides instructors to advise students what they specifically need to do to improve

  • The two most pressing issues of the day are Elon Musk’s plan to reinstate freedom of speech on Twitter and an impending war with Russia. Maybe these two issues can be tied together? First, let’s take a trip down Memory Lane and remember how we got to the point where we are begging a billionaire...
  • @G J T
    I still have yet to hear Andrew (who I’m fond of and read daily) or anyone else articulate a convincing argument for how Russian imperialism and a Eurasian-based global power dynamic would work to the benefit of white people in the west. I have also not yet heard he or anyone else provide one single example of Putin expressing concern or sympathy for our people who are currently suffering under a global, systematic, multi-faceted war of extermination against us.

    Perhaps someone here can enlighten me on how Putin flexing on and humiliating the west by way of conquering Ukraine will result in tangible, long-term gains for white right-wing men in the west. Schadenfreude or laughing at ZOG West vicariously through ZOG East do not count. An optimistic speculation as to how a significantly strengthened Russian regime would handle a crippled and helpless America or Europe (which seems to be what these people are hoping for) also does not count.

    No matter how you spin it, and no matter how decisively the American regime is theoretically brought to heel, we white westerners will suffer at the hands of someone, because the reality is NO ONE is looking out for our interests. We don’t take back our nations by being conquered or being under the jackboot of other, more powerful nations. Rooting for Russia to expedite the collapse of our nations with the assumption they’d then be handed back to us on a silver platter, is utterly absurd. But that appears to be the delusion these Putin shills are operating under.

    The Putin shills on the dissident right have been so demoralized, so starved of any political victory, that they’ve concocted an entirely fictional scenario that is contrary to everything history has shown us, and contrary to what the relevant parties themselves have shown themselves to be. Putin has zero interest in the future of the American people, our tradition and our children. Undermining ZOG to the extent where historical changes materialize will only give us new enemies. No one is coming to save you.

    Replies: @annamaria, @OilcanFloyd

    “Putin has zero interest in the future of the American people… Undermining ZOG to the extent where historical changes materialize will only give us new enemies. No one is coming to save you.”
    — Comments:
    1. According to your post, don’t touch ZOG! or we will have “new enemies.” Who exactly are these perspective “new enemies?”
    2. Who is supposed to “save you?” Could you put your sweet pacifier aside and become an adult? The Zionized US is a gangster state feeding on the blood and flesh and stolen wealth of the weaker countries. It seems that you are fine with the status quo and want the mass slaughter and massive looting to continue uninterrupted to feel good.

    Russia cares not about the US and will be happy to cut off all ties to the rotten empire. Russians have their problems to solve. Just leave them alone. It is the rotten Empire of Lies and Hypocrisy, which has been annoying and attacking Russia.

    “We don’t take back our nations by being conquered.” — You mean, you are not aware that “our nations” (the western civilization) are already conquered? Have you heard about MIC and holobiz?

    •ï¿½Replies: @G J T
    @annamaria


    1. According to your post, don’t touch ZOG! or we will have “new enemies.†Who exactly are these perspective “new enemies?â€
    �
    Egregiously dishonest interpretation of my comments. I want ZOG to be dismantled so I can have my country back, and nowhere in any of my comment history will you find me arguing otherwise. But that does not mean I’m willing to just swap out the current Jewish anti-white regime with another Jewish anti-white regime whose current national dynamics happen to superficially portray said regimes as less hostile to my nation and people than our own. Russia and China are not friendly or even ambivalent towards our people, the latter especially. I could go on for hours citing examples of how the Russians and Chinese express nothing but animosity and vengefulness for our white western nations (not just governments). And these are the people you wish to expedite the collapse of our homelands?

    Those are the new enemies we’d be dealing with if we got the current American regime out of the way. It’s bizarre that I even have to articulate this.

    I expect Russia to do whatever is within their means to further the strength, influence and status of their nation. What I don’t expect and find appalling is D-R personalities actively cheering on those aims at the ultimate expense of our own nations once these antagonist world powers have obtained the power to subjugate our people in whatever way they deem necessary to strengthen their own state and punish us for the transgressions of the empire. Punish us and implement measures meant to assure the threat is neutralized for decades to come. The German people could tell you a little about this, seeing as they suffered brutally and were generationally humiliated not once but twice after finding themselves on the losing end of the world wars.

    But hey, I’m sure Putin and the Chinese regime will just give us a pass out of the goodness of their hearts and give us free reign to establish our own independent, self-determining nations under largely traditional American principles that they unambiguously classify as Nazism, “cavemen nationalism,†and arrogant chauvinism- I.e the belief in the exceptional greatness that characterizes much of the early American nation. Yes, this all makes perfect sense.

    Because ultimately what people fail to understand is that these regimes are not actually at war with the governments of our great white nations - in fact much of the true power-wielding figures in each nation are all colluding far beneath the surface to achieve similar aims. What the powers such as Russia and China are at war with is western civilization itself, for which our rulers have zero investment in whatsoever. They are at war with US, because it is we who can still carry on this legacy of our civilizations they hold in such contempt.

    I pray to God Almighty that we break free of these demonic regimes at any cost, but that liberation coming at the hands of confirmed enemies of our history and civilization will be short-lived and farcical and only replace one variation of oppression and white genocide with another.

    Replies: @nokangaroos, @annamaria
  • From KQED: The opening of the article is overstating many of the changes currently being considered, but that's indicative of which way the wind is blowing. When you abolish the use of admissions tests, as the University of California just did in order to let in more of The Diverse, you are immediately going to...
  • @turtle
    @Rex Little

    No idea what goes on today.
    In the late 1960s, as I recall, the M/F ratio was approximately 17/1, which was limited by housing.
    https://mccormick.mit.edu/about/mccormick-history

    MIT’s admissions policy at the time dictated that the number of women
    admitted to MIT should be limited by the amount of housing available to them. The MIT administration claimed that, as McCormick grew overcrowded, they would be “[forced] again to apply more rigorous standards in the selection of female than of male applicants.â€
    �

    It was not until 1970 that MIT (under pressure from a growing number of female applicants) changed its admission policy, stating for the first time that female applicants should be judged solely on their merits rather than on the capacity of McCormick Hall. This change increased the number of women from 7.6% (Fall 1969) to 9.4% (Fall 1970) of the freshman class
    �
    None of the dorms were officially coed in those days. Although, contrary to official policy, you could keep your mistress in old East Campus (much to the chagrin of Dean K.R. Wadleigh), you just had to keep it on the down low.

    The Tech coeds I knew were extremely bright. One in particular is one of the few people I have met about whom I could say, without question, "This person is smarter than I am." Legend has it she consumed a six pack of Budweiser while she wrote her 18.02 exam (3 hours, in the Armory), and earned a "B" in the class, which was multivariate and vector integral calculus. I did not see this with my own eyes, as I took 18.02 the year before (I am class of 1970, she was class of 1971).

    I also got a "B" in 18.02, but I could not have done so under the influence of alcohol. Freshman calculus lectures were given by Professor Arthur P. Mattuck, who was quite a good lecturer, although the "standard" 18.01 and 18.02 were less rigorous than my high school calculus class. I really should have tested out of 18.01, but allowed myself to be intimidated by the idea of em eye tee, so did not even take the AP exam.

    Prof. Mattuck generally assigned more problems than anyone could be expected to do. Hence the saying, "drinking from a fire hose." My experience was that the lecturers were quite good, in all classes, but the recitation instructors varied in teaching ability. Some were quite good (tip of the hat to Carl Mazza in freshman chemistry) but others pretty much sucked, probably because they did not want to be there, but needed the TA stipend.

    Replies: @Rex Little, @MrE3001

    I am class of 1970

    Hey, so was I. I wonder if we knew each other in person. Probably not, unless you lived in Bexley (which, by the way, did officially go coed sometime in the early 70s).

    •ï¿½Replies: @turtle
    @Rex Little

    My living group was East Campus.
    I recall a Dave Little, also from EC, but not Rex. Don't recall if I knew anyone from Bexley.

    It's possible we have, or had, friends/acquaintances in common, though.
    I did have a few friends who were Course VI

    Any of these names ring a bell?
    all Course VI, class of '70 from East Parallel.
    Lewis Reich
    Lowell P. McClure
    Patrick Peterson

    Did you know any student-athletes?
    I played baseball for awhile, then rugby.
    (maybe TMI, I don't know)

    Replies: @Rex Little
  • Who would want to go to a brain surgeon if they attended this University?

  • Although I launched The Unz Review in late 2013, for the first couple of years I was preoccupied with political campaigns and software development work, and only wrote an occasional piece here and there. My only notable article was my lengthy expose of the true history of Sen. John McCain: John McCain: When “Tokyo Roseâ€...
  • You (Ron Unz) say that “5 million people” have died from “Covid-19” – but this is a condition (“Covid-19”) which no-one is able to define. They just say that the condition is generic symptoms of disease – a cough, fever, ‘brain fog’, tiredness, and all other generic symptoms. There aren’t any distinct signs of the C-19 condition that present in autopsy results. This means there is no evidence of any condition “Covid-19”, and you are talking rubbish.

    You might as well as say the ‘evil spirits from the forest’ – as detected via a PCR test which highlights the presence of a meaningless sequence of 200 RNA base pairs – have caused 5 billion deaths. The symptoms that the ‘evil spirits’ induce are all the genetic symptoms that humans commonly exhibit – high temperature, coughing, paleness, heart problems and so on.

    This is a scam like Witch Doctors operate. They identify a terrible single malevolent entity that is capable of causing all illness in humans, and then offer a remedy to it. A scientific approach is to observe distinct conditions – distinct sets of symptoms that present in distinct sequences perhaps – and then try to work out the cause of these specific conditions (e.g. Measles, Dengue Fever, etc). In contrast, the ‘Covid-19’ condition has never been defined so we can’t say it exists.

    •ï¿½Thanks: Truth Vigilante
    •ï¿½Replies: @Anon
    @Fatmanscoop


    This is a scam like Witch Doctors operate. They identify a terrible single malevolent entity that is capable of causing all illness in humans, and then offer a remedy to it.
    �
    COVID-19 is nothing more than an operation that Jews have perfected over the millennia, that of 'Poisoning the Well'. However, it takes a whole lot of willing gentiles to pull it off.
  • From KQED: The opening of the article is overstating many of the changes currently being considered, but that's indicative of which way the wind is blowing. When you abolish the use of admissions tests, as the University of California just did in order to let in more of The Diverse, you are immediately going to...
  • @Anon
    Re: weed-out classes. A family member started college at a well-regarded Boston area school this past fall. By the start of the Spring semester, she had already weeded-out of Mechanical Engineering and Psychology, settling on Philosophy (enjoying it and doing very well). I don't know what one does with a Philosophy degree.

    Replies: @JamesII, @kpkinsunnyphiladelphia, @RedpilledAF, @ScarletNumber, @Bill Jones, @acementhead, @Dube

    I don’t know what one does with a Philosophy degree.

    I imagine that that’s a question a Philosophy Graduate can spend the rest of their life considering.

  • @bjdubbs
    ex-MIT professor Phil Greenspun has said that school should be like a job, with no homework and a students working on assignments while a teacher walks around and answers questions. With homework, only students who have the discipline actually learn anything.

    Replies: @ScarletNumber, @FLgeezer

    What else would one expect from a “Professor†Greenspun?

  • Heresy In the 21st Century Never in my long journalistic career have I ever hesitated to put pen to paper – until now. Indeed, I have delayed writing this overview of Dr. Kollerstrom’s remarkable book for going on six years.[1] Up until now no subject had been too controversial, too sensitive, too beyond the pale...
  • eah says:
    @Carolyn Yeager
    @Carolyn Yeager


    And 90+ year old grandmothers languish in prison there, for their disbelief.
    �
    I'm going to take this on too. Ursula is not being sent to prison "because she doesn't believe" but because she publicly speaks about her disbelief, in speeches, videos and writings. So it's what you're allowed to say or publish, not what you're allowed to 'believe.' Ursula knows the law very well and knows what she's doing. I support and admire her for her actions. It's not really helpful to pretend otherwise. It's better to take the following approach:

    Germar Rudolf makes it clear in his book "Resistance is Obligatory" (second edition 2016 - my advice is to skip the Foreward and go straight to the Introduction) that the universally acknowledged scientific approach, which is allowed by the German 'Constitution' (Basic Law) includes the right to publish and promote one's findings from their scientific investigations. But this is what is being denied, unconstitutionally, by the addition of Article 130, a special law that supersedes constitutional law on one subject only -- insulting or harming Jews, or the so-called 'incitement of the public' exception. This exception is what should be attacked because it's on very shaky ground. In fact, it doesn't seem to me to have any real support whatsoever. It seems to be justified only with the idea that the German Third Reich carried on a genocide of major and inhumane proportions against Jews in particular, for which the German Federal Republic must be forever vigilant above and beyond all other nations to prevent happening again, yet for which no evidence need be presented on the grounds that it is Self-Evident. Think of that!

    So the problem should be approached on two fronts: that such a genocide/holocaust did not ever happen, and that the special exception law is unconstitutional. It is not to get sidetracked about "grandmothers" in prison as the Jews do. They do that because that's all they have and they love to keep it on the emotional level where they're masters of manipulation.

    I highly recommend Germar's book. Get it from his personal website or at Codoh Books. I'm sure it's online as a pdf too, but I haven't looked.

    Replies: @HdC, @eah

    But this is what is being denied, unconstitutionally, by the addition of Article 130, a special law that supersedes constitutional law on one subject only — insulting or harming Jews, or the so-called ‘incitement of the public’ exception.

    In its rulings in everything from e.g. the s.g. ‘Eurorettung’ to the ‘Erhöhung des Rundfunkbeitrags’, the Bundesverfassungsgericht has shown itself to be more of a political than a judicial body: it literally always rules the way the government wants it to rule — so I don’t think they would ever rule against anything in §130 (link).

    This exception is what should be attacked because it’s on very shaky ground. In fact, it doesn’t seem to me to have any real support whatsoever.

    What kind of ‘support’ do you mean? — as I said above, I think the political, judicial, and media establishments fully support §130 — and I can tell you that §130, as well as prosecutions that take place due to it, enjoy wide support among ordinary Germans — e.g. when Monika Schaefer was arrested in München (while attending the trial of Sylvia Stolz), I read German media reports of her arrest, including those of outlets located in München and Bayern — when commenting was possible, all of the comments were of the ‘lock her up and throw away the key’ variety.

    In this context, the judicial Abkommen that resulted in the prosecution of John Demjanjuk, and later others, is also worth noting: basically, as part of §130 related ‘Holocaust’ dogma, German courts simply stipulate that Jews were murdered in a camp during some time period; this cannot be disputed and need not be proved — once it is established that someone was employed at the camp during this time period, no matter in what capacity, that person is charged with Beihilfe zum Mord — note it need not be proven that the defendant had anything to do with, or even knew about, the alleged killings — conviction is a foregone conclusion, but they always hold a show trial, which usually consists of the extremely elderly defendant (like Ursula, most have been in their 90s) expressing regret and asking for forgiveness, while Jews, both ‘survivors’ as well as relatives of supposed victims, berate the defendant in court.

    German civil society is, to some extent, both dominated and corrupted by the ‘Holocaust’.

    •ï¿½Thanks: HdC
    •ï¿½Replies: @HdC
    @eah

    Interesting narrative; but I have one reservation with this statement: "...all of the comments were of the ‘lock her up and throw away the key’ variety...".
    Although I have no doubt that this statement is true, at least on the surface, the media that publishes the comments SELECTS the comments that are published.
    Further, commentators are likely to be individuals that have an axe to grind, or who profit by keeping the holocaust Greuelpropaganda in the public's eye, ie. they are motivated.
    Thus, the question 'how many Germans buy into the holocaust hysteria' remains unanswered.
    Unless I am mistaken (again!), Monika Schaefer is a Canadian citizen and made those "incriminating" statements in Canada, where they are not yet illegal.

    Replies: @eah, @Carolyn Yeager
    , @The Old Philosopher
    @eah


    German civil society is, to some extent, both dominated and corrupted by the ‘Holocaust’.
    �
    That's the underlying social dynamic that keeps propelling it as you describe it.
  • The previous Open Thread has well over 1,000 comments and is getting a little sluggish, so here’s a new one for the Karlin Community. Just to kick it off, here are a couple of interviews I'd strongly recommend, one of British Prof. Richard Sakwa on the Grayzone, and the other of Scott Ritter you was...
  • @Yellowface Anon
    @Pixo

    Hasn't Cyprus (EU member) and Switzerland followed EU sanctions and proceeded to seized all the wealth on their soil? Singapore too in SE Asia.

    Replies: @Pixo

    I believe the official EU actions against Russia are minimal and it is the national-level sanctions that go much further.

    •ï¿½Replies: @A123
    @Pixo


    I believe the official EU actions against Russia are minimal and it is the national-level sanctions that go much further.
    �
    As a general rule, it is the reverse. The EU 'sanctions' are extreme but unenforceable. The bulk of Europe is quietly ignoring or openly repudiating EU overreach.

    There are individual nations (e.g. Germany, Poland) working against European norms. They have more extreme policy than even the anti-European EU. However, it is focused on quashing internal actors.

    PEACE 😇
    , @Yellowface Anon
    @Pixo

    Doesn't EU coordinate the sanctions?
  • It is the opinion of most patriotic voices in Russian alt-media (remember, hardcore Russian patriots are still not allowed on mainstream media in Russia) that while the special operation in Ukraine is all well and good, there is no good explanation for why Ukraine was lost in the first place. How could the Kremlin let...
  • @Verymuchalive
    Another drunk man in a bar outburst from Slavskiy, and he expects people to pay subscriptions for stuff of this quality.

    And then this.

    And even now, the Kremlin and its loathsome PR spokespeople claim that they are only in Ukraine temporarily, to conduct a de-nazification campaign. Not only is this claim bizarre, but what’s worse, people think they might actually mean it. So, after smashing the Ukrainian army and the volunteer battalions, they intend to do what — pull out?
    �
    No references.
    Last month, in negotiations with Ukraine, Russia demanded the demilitarisation of Ukraine, Ukraines's neutrality confirmed by treaty and Ukrainian recognition of Crimea as Russian, and of Donetsk and Lugansk Oblasts as independent states.
    The demands will be very much greater now.

    Replies: @Durruti, @Olivier1973

    The demands will be very much greater now.

    Like a Kherson PR, then a Zaporoje PR, then a Nikolaev PR, then a Dniepropetrovsk PR, then a Kharkov PR, then an Odessa PR, etc.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Ace
    @Olivier1973

    Sounds good.
  • The previous Open Thread has well over 1,000 comments and is getting a little sluggish, so here’s a new one for the Karlin Community. Just to kick it off, here are a couple of interviews I'd strongly recommend, one of British Prof. Richard Sakwa on the Grayzone, and the other of Scott Ritter you was...
  • @Pixo
    @sudden death

    NatGas policy since the invasion is stupid on both sides.

    Expensively rerouting gas is negative sum and should stop.

    If the West wants to reduce Russia’s power from gas exports, it has to reduce domestic consumption or increase production.

    Similarly “you must pay in rubles†is dumb symbolism.

    Russia’s poor war performance may be linked to its resource curse: domestic wages are so high from resource exports they cannot compete in other industries, letting their defense sector that used to supply half the world stagnate then decline.

    Replies: @Mikhail, @sudden death, @A123, @Daniel H

    Similarly “you must pay in rubles†is dumb symbolism.

    How is it dumb? And the strategy seems to be more than symbolic. By forcing gas/oil importers to pay for Russian gas/oil in Rubles Russia is compelling the west to sell products to Russia, products (advanced technology) that the west at this moment would rather not sell to Russia. “You want Rubles? We will give you Rubles, but sell us those advanced industrial controllers, chip manufacturing infrastructure, etc that we will pay for with Rubles…” Seems like a smart move by Russia. Why accept payment in US dollars when the US state will end up stealing it anyway? What do I know about economics, though.

  • From a UK.gov website: From the BBC in 2012: Britain's showmen: All the fun of the fair? By Emma Kasprzak BBC News Published12 April 2012 As the travelling fair season begins, fairground workers from all over Britain are heading out on to the road. But while their presence is familiar, what do we really know...
  • anonymous[358] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:

    FYI

    Warren Buffett just made fun of malcolm gladwell for his 10k hour rule during today shareholder meeting.

    Guess you might be interested.

    •ï¿½Replies: @J.Ross
    @anonymous

    I dislike Buffett but despise Gladwell, and his hour rule always struck me as cargo cult fetishism of the same type which leads every crystal salesman and hubcap photographer rename his basement an "Institute."

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Anonymous
  • Just over a decade ago, minimum wage laws had largely vanished from the American political debate. Although they still remained on the books, they had fallen sharply in real terms, with the federal figure of $7.25 per hour being roughly one-third lower than at its 1968 peak. Relative to the overall productivity of the American...
  • FKA Max says: •ï¿½Website
    @Truth Vigilante
    @FKA Max

    You write:

    The commodities boom of the early 2000s strengthened the AUD and that was the main reason for car manufacturers to leave Oz .... As billions poured in from resource extraction between 2001 and 2011, Australian currency doubled in value.
    �
    Admittedly, the AUD is a commodity currency and as the market value of the commodities we dig out of the ground rises and falls, our dollar rises and falls with it.

    But you CONVENIENTLY chose the starting point of 2001 (the absolute trough in the AUD when world commodity prices were at a 30 year low as the AUD bottomed out around the time of 9/11 at around US 47 cents) and compared it to 2011 when the AUD was at an absolute high of USD $1.10 (refer to the graph below and click on to the 'All Years' tab):

    https://www.macrotrends.net/2551/australian-us-dollar-exchange-rate-historical-chart

    As you can see, the AUD fluctuated quite a bit and it was never at a sustained high for any length of time.
    The corrupt MSM and those with an axe to grind peddled the fable that the temporarily high AUD was the reason for the demise of the auto industry and you lapped up that explanation without critical analysis.

    FACT # 1: The AUD was ALWAYS worth more than the USD (with no exceptions) prior to 1982, and usually MUCH MORE (30% - 40% more) valuable than the USD in that period.
    And yet the auto industry didn't collapse or look like folding in that entire time.

    FACT # 2: A particular country in east Asia saw their currency appreciate rapidly year after year Vs the USD for around five decades after WWII with NO negative consequences for its auto industry. In fact, quite the opposite, it's auto industry powered ahead.

    I refer of course to the nation of Japan.

    I haven't managed to track down the exchange rate data prior to 1970, but I know the Japanese yen was MUCH lower Vs the USD in the period preceding 1970.
    Even so, the data for the last 50 years will still suffice to make my point.

    In the early 70's , USD $1 = 380 JPY.
    In around 2011 we had USD $1 = 76 JPY (click on to the 'All Years' tab to view the graph in the link below covering the last 50 years):

    https://www.macrotrends.net/2550/dollar-yen-exchange-rate-historical-chart

    As you can see, there was a METEORIC appreciation of the Japanese yen (JPY) Vs the USD.

    One has to remember that the INPUT COSTS of the raw materials in building a car (iron ore for steel, copper etc), are all denominated in USD.

    When the JPY rises, it REDUCES the cost of said raw material inputs, thus lowering the cost of manufacture.
    Concurrent with that, the Japanese automated their auto plants and thus produced MORE CARS using FEWER WORKERS, which made the cars cheaper still whilst simultaneously improving quality control.

    In the case of the Australian auto industry, it's raw materials are also priced in USD and as the AUD appreciated, it too procured these items that went into the manufacture of the car for less.
    More importantly, I recall reading that a typical GM or Ford vehicle that rolled off the Australian assembly line, imported around 30% of the components used in the manufacture of that vehicle from abroad.
    For example, the Holden Commodore 5.7 litre (and later the 6.0 and 6.2 V8 engines), were wholly sourced from the U.S - as were a variety of other componentry.

    So, when the AUD rose, said items imported from abroad became CHEAPER - thus offsetting some of the rise in local labour costs.


    Bottom Line: The strong AUD around 2011 was an EXCUSE used by the union movement and those central planners and socialists as to why the Australian auto industry collapsed.

    The REAL reason is that the heavily unionised auto plants were inflexible with wage demands and working conditions/regulatory requirements that made Aussie auto plants inefficient.
    And, to compound matters, foreign multinationals like GM and Ford did not invest in automation, instead they kept the business alive on life support by getting billions of subsidies from the Australian taxpayer, knowing all the while that they were always going to leave Australia eventually as the wage and regulatory requirements stifled competitiveness.
    �

    Replies: @FKA Max

    FACT # 2: A particular country in east Asia saw their currency appreciate rapidly year after year Vs the USD for around five decades after WWII with NO negative consequences for its auto industry. In fact, quite the opposite, it’s auto industry powered ahead.

    I refer of course to the nation of Japan.

    That’s because Japanese car manufacturers have been building lots of their cars outside of Japan for decades (Click MORE tag, to read below, for example, how they are taking advantage of Mexican Peso weakness, despite having to pay higher wages (US$16/hour minimum for over 40% of auto parts) now, due to USMCA), chronological order:

    [MORE]

    Japan Makes More Cars Elsewhere
    Aug. 1, 2006
    https://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/01/business/worldbusiness/01cars.html or https://archive.ph/txg2I

    Japan’s big 3 automakers built more cars [subtract trucks, sport-utility vehicles and crossovers] in U.S. than Detroit 3 last year
    Jun 1, 2016
    https://www.bizjournals.com/columbus/news/2016/06/01/japans-big-3-automakers-built-more-cars-in-u-s.html or

    That’s a topic we Central Ohioans know well thanks to Honda Motor Co., the first Japanese brand to open a U.S. assembly plant, which it did in Marysville back in 1982. Honda employs more than 14,000 across multiple facilities here, not to mention its supplier network.
    […]
    $45.4 billion: cumulative investment in the past 40 years

    Mexican Peso weakness

    “Weak Mexican peso aids factories in crisis” March 10, 2009 because the factories are owned and operated by foreign firms with dollars who bring in much of their equipment from the United States and all their assembly, running and labor costs are in pesos, they win out because their dollars go much further in Mexico, given the devalued currency https://archive.ph/ezKSs

    is one of the main reasons car manufacturers prefer to stay in Mexico, despite having to pay higher wages now:

    Japanese automakers prefer staying in Mexico
    1 July, 2020
    https://mexico-now.com/japanese-automakers-prefer-to-stay-in-mexico-than-move-to-the-united-states/ or https://archive.ph/6RGoI

    According to the Japanese news portal Asian Nikkei Review, “Japan’s automakers are choosing to maintain operations in Mexico and pay Mexican workers more or even just pay fees,†contrary to what Donald Trump hoped to achieve with the USMCA, attracting such manufacturing sites back to a preference for the United States. […] now that 40% or more of auto parts are required to be manufactured by workers who are paid at least US$16 an hour to avoid paying tariffs in the region.

    •ï¿½Replies: @FKA Max
    @FKA Max


    local production helps Japanese carmakers shield their revenue and profits from currency swings and helps them tailor designs to local tastes
    �
    - https://archive.ph/txg2I#selection-451.17-451.160

    Three out of every four Japanese cars and trucks sold in the U.S. are built in North America.
    �
    - https://archive.ph/GOUAt

    I just wanted to add that one of the main reasons for the weak Mexican Peso have been the drug wars. The Mexican government has no real incentive to stop them completely, because it would make Mexico a less desirable manufacturing destination for globalized car companies, etc.:

    Chapter 13. The North American Drug War
    [...]
    4. The Drug War has Improved Mexico's Economic Prospects
    Unfortunately at the cost to Americans. But, he notes, the internal drug war reduces the cost of labor IN Mexico.
    �
    - http://web.archive.org/web/20220401145831/http://www.xenophon-mil.org/politicaleconomy/zeihansuperpower.htm

    How Mexico is Winning the Car Manufacturing War
    Jun 15, 2015
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6HyIEYZOPMs
  • Fr0m the New York Times Science section: Anglo-Saxon Kings Made Sure to Eat Their Vegetables, Study Shows Contrary to popular belief, the ruling classes gorged on meat only on rare occasions, according to an analysis of more than 2,000 skeletons buried during medieval times. By Maria Cramer April 29, 2022 Anglo-Saxon kings have long reigned...
  • @JohnnyWalker123
    https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1520248582204313600

    Replies: @Mike Tre

    Make Twitter Great Again?

  • Adapted from the latest Radio Derb, available exclusively at VDARE.com [Videos and transcripts from the first VDARE.com Conference will be posted over the next few days]. Last week I promised you a report on the first VDARE.com conference at our castle in beautiful West Virginia, so here it is. A warning: I'm going to gush....
  • Criminalize Self-Hate Speech.

    If Uncle Toms and Self-Loathing Jews are scum, so are self-hating whites.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @Priss Factor


    If Uncle Toms and Self-Loathing Jews are scum, so are self-hating whites.

    �
    They don't hate themselves, they hate us. Just like the old planter class.
  • The previous Open Thread has well over 1,000 comments and is getting a little sluggish, so here’s a new one for the Karlin Community. Just to kick it off, here are a couple of interviews I'd strongly recommend, one of British Prof. Richard Sakwa on the Grayzone, and the other of Scott Ritter you was...
  • AP says:
    @S
    @AP



    The US and UK are not the same nations they were in 1940, however, and things might not go quite as they’ve originally planned.

    �
    Russia is much weaker relative to the USSR of 1939 than the USA is it to the USA of 1939. Setting aside the late and post Soviet era decay, Russia is only about half of the USSR.
    �
    Thanks, AP. I should clarify, however, what I meant about the US and the UK not being the same as in 1940.

    The demographics for the US are of course quite different now. I think for the worse. The UK, particularly England, seems to be deliberately destroying it's own Anglo-Saxon power base. So the US and UK are weaker in that sense than they were imo.

    In their blinding hubris, some large segments of the US and UK elites and their hangers on may think, even so, that a WWIII with Russia will be a repeat of WWII with Germany, where relatively speaking, the US and UK (though particularly the US) got off a lot lighter than many other countries in regards to damage sustained and casualties incurred.

    That might well change quite a bit this go around. That is what I was getting at. No doubt the elites who thought it would all be 'a cakewalk' with Russia would be shocked.

    Some of the upper tier of the US and UK elites seem to know better and are planning accordingly. I think the stories of the extensive blast and radiation proof underground shelters, the kind with a ten year supply of food, water, oxygen, entertainment facilities, etc, built in Southern portions of the globe for the ultra wealthy and powerful, are probably true.

    Anyhow, the US in the last years of the Trump administration increased US internal steel production capabilities and with fracking, has made the US entirely capable of being wholly oil independent from the Mideast and elsewhere. I think this was in preparation for WWIII.

    I think after a relatively short conventional war with Russia (and China, Iran, N Korea, etc,) this war would go nuclear, as long planned.

    What to do?

    First and foremost, people in the US and UK, ie the Anglosphere, where much of this is emanating from, should refuse and stand down in regards to any support for this war.

    Though certainly more difficult for people in Ukraine and Russia at present, where things are quite a bit 'hotter', and seemingly counter-intuitive, I would suggest the same. I would perhaps say different if I thought any of the parties involved were fighting 'on their terms', but I don't see it. I instead see various peoples being manipulated into this war against their own interest, with the objective being ultimately that they be destroyed.

    And pray. And not necessarily in that order.

    Replies: @AP

    Thanks, AP. I should clarify, however, what I meant about the US and the UK not being the same as in 1940.

    The demographics for the US are of course quite different now. I think for the worse.

    There are currently 204 million white Americans, out of a total US population of 330 million (not that non-whites are of zero military value).

    In 1939 the total population of the USA was 131 million. And America’s military built up quite a lot compared to 1939. In 1939 the US army had 174,000 soldiers. Today it has 485,00 soldiers. This does not count reserves or national guard.

    UK has 67 million people compared to 46 million in 1939. It’s military is probably worse now, though it does have its own nukes.

    USSR had 168 million people in 1939. Russian federation has only 145 million. It is now at war with what had been the second most populous part of the USSR. Its military, though better than it had bee in the 90s, is worse than it had been in 1939. In 1939 the Red Army numbered 1.8 million soldiers. Today’s Russia’s ground forces numbered 285,000 troops (this does not include national guard or reserves).

    So compared to 1939, Russia is in a much worse position vis a vis the Anglo world in terms of both populations and military might. Not even close.

    First and foremost, people in the US and UK, ie the Anglosphere, where much of this is emanating from, should refuse and stand down in regards to any support for this war.

    US and UK should not be directly or openly involved but they should provide maximum assistance to Ukraine as long as Russian troops are on Ukrainian soil (and make clear that once Russia is chased away from Ukraine support will no longer be necessary as the task will have been achieved). Provide what Soviets provided for Vietnam (they gave Vietnam around 400 Migs). Turn Ukraine into a woodchipper for Russian soldiers where Russia will get bloodied for going where it does not belong, until Russia chooses to pull its hand out of the machine. It will thus be completely Russia’s choice, how much of its soldiers and expensive equipment it wants to waste. Ukraine and its western-supplied arms aren’t going into Russia (except in rare cases on the border, linked to the invasion of Ukraine), Russia is getting its people and equipment wasted in Ukraine in a way that is totally of Russia’s choosing.

    •ï¿½Disagree: S
    •ï¿½Replies: @Yellowface Anon
    @AP


    until Russia chooses to pull its hand out of the machine.
    �
    Putin will grab the cheget with the other hand and aim it at the one setting up the woodchipper. Same with any attempt on his monopoly on power. Shoigu is now too meek to stop the orders, and the post can be replaced until Putin finds a yesman.

    Brandon will do whatever he's told, but Blinken and every neocon in the Pentagon still have a sense of self-preservation.
    , @S
    @AP

    In general I find your posts quite intelligent and insightful. I'm sympathetic to both your Ukrainian people, and their aspirations, and the Russian people, in this almost impossible situation.

    It's the context of the entire thing.

    How can the US/UK as nations possibly care about the Ukrainian people if they don't even care about their own Anglo-Saxons?

    I don't think they can.

    The US/UK 'cares' about the Ukrainians in the same way a thief 'cares' about his mark, a fox cares about his hen, or, a master, his slave. In other words not at all in any positive or good sense.

    I wish it were not so and it pains me to say these things.

    Chattel slavery and its trade historically corrupted large and powerful segments of the Anglo-Saxon elites of the United States and United Kingdom. It still does via it's monetization, wage slavery, ie the so called cheap labor/mass immigration system, the economic and political basis of the modern progressive multicultural state, a state which with its wage slave (ie 'cheap labor') 'immigrant' as it's centerpiece closely parallels the chattel slave holding society it evolved from in many ways.

    These corrupted Anglo-Saxon elites and their hangers on 'cared' more about their slaves, chattel or wage, skilled and unskilled, than their own people. Specifically, they cared about the financial value of the labor they were systematically stealing from their wage slaves by grossly under paying them for it.

    This is the economic/political system your Ukrainian government is plugging into.

    Lastly, not to compare specifics but rather the concept, there was a 1971 movie called Murphy's War starring Peter O'toole as 'Murphy', a man employed on an isolated Carribean island in 1945.

    Murphy, with some cause, has a hatred of Germans. Though the war has just ended, he, even so, continues to hunt a German sub which has been lurking in the island's immediate vicinity with a float plane, a floating crane, and a live torpedo he has scrounged.

    Ultimately, Murphy corners and sinks the German sub, but also kills himself in the process.


    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/9/92/Murphy%27s_War_Poster.jpeg

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murphy%27s_War

    Replies: @AP, @Triteleia Laxa
  • From KQED: The opening of the article is overstating many of the changes currently being considered, but that's indicative of which way the wind is blowing. When you abolish the use of admissions tests, as the University of California just did in order to let in more of The Diverse, you are immediately going to...
  • American education—and also institutions that depend on the intellectual ability of its members, such as NASA—now exist entirely to put on a farce that “hidden figures” with an IQ of 80 are super-smart and should be given credit not only for the scant achievements of the present but also for the more impressive achievements of the past.

    Let me disabuse any American nationalist that may be still hanging around these parts: the US will not survive. No polity can embrace the insane and destructive ideology that has come to rule the US and survive. What’s more, the world will be better off once the US is gone. White Americans will also be better off as long as they awake sufficiently to ward off roving bands of cannibal Negroes.

  • The previous Open Thread has well over 1,000 comments and is getting a little sluggish, so here’s a new one for the Karlin Community. Just to kick it off, here are a couple of interviews I'd strongly recommend, one of British Prof. Richard Sakwa on the Grayzone, and the other of Scott Ritter you was...
  • German_reader says:
    @AP
    @utu

    You are absolutely correct about the German intellectuals and the German state but our German Reader is better than them, he at least supports arming Ukraine.

    Replies: @German_reader

    and the German state

    Germany sent Stinger missiles and anti-tank weapons almost immediately after the invasion.
    Apparently things like this as well:


    They’ve also sent Patriot batteries to Slovakia, so Slovakia will send its S-300 system to Ukraine, and similar arrangements are planned with Slovenia and T-72-like tanks. And now they’re even intending to send German Gepard anti-air tanks to Ukraine.
    imo this entire “Germany isn’t supporting Ukraine at all, yet financing Russia’s war” narrative is nothing more than a fairly cynical media campaign.

    •ï¿½Replies: @AP
    @German_reader

    Germany has been very slow and helpful mostly under extreme pressure. Not 100% useless but barely and grudgingly helpful, compared to the Eastern Europeans, Anglos, Scandinavians, etc. I remember how at the beginning the arms shipments to Ukraine all had to avoid German airspace, and how Germany was blocking other countries from sending German-made equipment to Ukraine. The German state was probably hoping Ukraine would have been finished off quickly so business as usual could be resumed.

    But Germany is better now. Though even those Gepards aren’t scheduled to be sent for a couple more months IIRC.

    Replies: @German_reader
  • Gregory Hood and Chris Roberts talk about the late Samuel P. Huntington’s “Clash of Civilizations†thesis.
  • One interesting topic raised by the discussion is the need for the “unifying myths” for white folks.

    I agree they are only made possible through struggle.

    The current white youth are divided, confused, misled.

    Unfortunately they have not even hit bottom yet–and I think the struggle cannot even start in earnest until that has happened.

    We are just living in bizarro times–where the craziest sociopaths rule virtually every large institution in the West.

    The myths and statues will be of those who rebuild after the inevitable crash–not those who got in the way of the falling knives during it.

  • The previous Open Thread has well over 1,000 comments and is getting a little sluggish, so here’s a new one for the Karlin Community. Just to kick it off, here are a couple of interviews I'd strongly recommend, one of British Prof. Richard Sakwa on the Grayzone, and the other of Scott Ritter you was...
  • @A123
    @Beckow


    Large parts of the world would be dysfunctional even if they survived.
    �
    Large parts of America are already dysfunctional.

    In a nuclear war the most densely populated and concentrated populations would be most at risk, ...
    �
    Blue Cities !
    ��� Blue States !!
    ������ Blue Cities in Blue States !!!

    Davos people get their wish
    �
    Is it too late for MAGA to start using a Phoenix rather than a Lion?

    PEACE 😇

    �
    https://twt-thumbs.washtimes.com/media/image/2017/08/30/8_302017_b4-guld-phoenix-ris8201_c0-180-866-684_s885x516.jpg?0364a45a1256f9694b52c67e423ff6623c0a8a2c

    Replies: @Beckow

    There are levels of dysfunction. You are right, since the ruling liberalism is concentrated everywhere in the biggest cities, a nuclear war would – among other things – move the political spectrum dramatically to the conservative side. Now, there is a thought…

    •ï¿½LOL: A123
  • It is the opinion of most patriotic voices in Russian alt-media (remember, hardcore Russian patriots are still not allowed on mainstream media in Russia) that while the special operation in Ukraine is all well and good, there is no good explanation for why Ukraine was lost in the first place. How could the Kremlin let...
  • Blissex says:
    @awry

    there is no good explanation for why Ukraine was lost in the first place. How could the Kremlin let a country split evenly between a pro-Russia and pro-West vote for multiple election cycles suddenly, almost overnight, be turned into a hostile, armed to the teeth Israel on the border of the greater Slavic world?
    �
    2014 was a turning point as the Ukrainians were forced to choose between the EU and the Russian-led Eurasian Union, and Yanukovich was acting like a windbag, but always late. The former looked more attractive for the Ukrainian professional class who wanted EU salaries. The pro-Russia bloc was quickly repressed.
    Russia should have annexed the eastern part in 2014, not just Crimea. The half-assed attempt with backing the Donbas separatists didn't worth the price. As I understand Russia was much less prepared to sanctions then so the Kremlin didn't risk a total war, despite that they could have won then.

    Replies: @Blissex

    «Russia was much less prepared to sanctions then so the Kremlin didn’t risk a total war, despite that they could have won then. »

    That too, but most importantly the context was the 2008 defense of south-Ossetia from Saakashvili’s war of aggression: even if the georgian forces were mostly a rabble of far-right extremist ethnic-cleansers, the Russian Federation forces had considerable difficulties pushing them back, and the war showed how disorganised and weak the Russian Federation military has become.

    I guess that it took a long time to re-train and re-organize them and make them more effective, and they were not ready in 2014.

  • The Washington Post jumps on a new study of the genes and behaviors of thousands of dogs as opening another front in The War on Stereotypes: Looking for a well-behaved dog? Breed may not tell you much. Researchers found that breed alone explains very little about dog behavior and personality By Katie Shepherd Yesterday at...
  • @AnotherDad
    @gregor

    I like 'em better seeing this.

    But man, that's some seriously rat infested ground. Don't know what was going on there previously, but cropland should be nothing like that.

    Replies: @Buffalo Joe

    AD, when I was a kid I loved going to our friend’s working farm where I could spend all day driving a tractor. I only remember seeing one rat and a few rabbits that I ran over with the disc harrow. What type of soil harbors that many rats?

    •ï¿½Replies: @Almost Missouri
    @Buffalo Joe


    What type of soil harbors that many rats?
    �
    It's shocking how many rats are in that field. I've never seen anything like that. At the rate they're going, a few square yards per minute, the density must be enormous. Presumably the rats were feeding on a root crop or something, but I don't see any evidence of tuber tops or other food sources in the video.

    Imagine having to turn over all your acres of soil by hand with a pack of terriers watching just to get rid of the vermin. Hard to raise any profitable crop in those circumstances.

    Maybe it's a British thing?

    Replies: @John Johnson
  • The good news we've learned since Russian invaded Ukraine back on February 24 is that Russia is militarily weaker than most people expected. The future is unwritten, so this could change with time. After all, the Red Army that invaded Finland in November 1939 was a lot less competent than the Red Army that invaded...
  • @HA
    @AKAHorace

    "Look, I don’t want to pick on you in particular, but a lot of the comments in this thread are becoming unnecessarily personal."

    But you did choose to pick on me, didn't you? You could have chosen PhysicistDave to send your cri de cœur, but you didn't. Similarly, it's weird how all these "you're too involved" accusations (that curiously seem to happen right about the point where it has obvious that the previous argument the accuser was putting forth is a tissue of pointlessness) come my way, as opposed to PhysicistDave or Sean or PaperbackWriter or the far more numerous Putin trolls who lurk here.

    You say you don't want things to get unnecessarily personal? Look up those links I helpfully included when I told you about how PhysicistDave would dearly love to leave this country he so despises, were it not for the fact that he's not fluent enough in Chinese and wouldn't know how to enroll his daughter in college there (which, again, don't seem to bother the millions of people who have chosen to pack up and move here). You know where I got that personal information? I didn't make it up. No, it was from PhysicstDave himself who chose to make it personal. If he's going to lay it all out there, and introduce it as evidence of how fervently he feels about all this, then it's going to get used, even if only to expose him as the entitled, whiny, first-world-problem little Fauntleroy brat that he is. Same goes for his tirades against Baptist or other clerics who have admitted to him that they don't believe in Christianity, or as PhysicistDave refers to it, that "pack of lies", and yet keep spouting it to their congregants, much to PhysicistDave's disgust. So when I'm able to catch HIM dispensing dogma from that so-called "pack of lies" that he clearly doesn't believe, he's got no one but himself to blame for making Western civilization one that "doesn't deserve to exist", as he claims. He's the one who made it personal. How does that quip go? "When you stare into the abyss, remember, the abyss has at this point invested in cameras and recording equipment." Something like that.

    Same goes for JimDandy and his eagerness to stick up for the likes of Scott Ritter. You really think that going to the mat for a twice-convicted sex offender doesn't "expose" something personal? Who are we kidding? And the fact that he thinks I'm Hasbara is telling, in the sense that he likely believes that actual Hasbara operatives DO have access to his personal records, rap sheet, and maybe even his browser history, including the weird sites he evidently knows way too much about. I suspect that's why he simply chooses to press the LOL button and hurl empty accusations at me -- it's all that's left to him. And you don't think he's just made this all about himself? Come on.

    The reason I choose not to reveal much about who I am, apart from having no Ukrainian relatives (which is something Ron Unz claims he always suspected, even though it's obvious from the many times I noted that I myself wouldn't care if Putin had been capable to arrange the same deal in Ukraine that Russia has with Belarus), is simply because I DO want to keep it about the issue at hand. Anything I offer personally would at most be merely anecdotal, and therefore trivial. But if anyone else wants to drop clues about his own personal history, or porn fetishes as the case may be, that's on them. And that DOES remain true regardless of whether Ukraine wins or loses. I've learned plenty about what it takes to be a Putin fanboy. Because they've insisted on laying it all out there. And so far, I'm not impressed.

    So next time, I think you can pick a better target to pick on. I'm not offended by you choosing to pick on me this time around, but let me point out that that DOES say something about where your personal preferences lie in all this as well, like it or not, and that's grist for the mill. You've just made it so. The abyss stares back.

    Replies: @JimDandy, @JimDandy, @AKAHorace

    HA,

    I picked you at random. I could have equally well picked PhysicistDave or several other commentators here. At this point so many people are making personal attacks on each other that it is difficult to figure out what they actually think about the war in the Ukraine.

    The posts that people make here will have no effect on what happens in the war. They do have a big effect on the quality of discussion on the Unz review. The more intense and personal comments get the less willing posters become to consider the merits of other peoples arguments. The Unz site has a remarkable commitment to making sure that viewpoints that are not represented in the Main Stream Media. As posters we can help support this by accompanying it with intelligent and reasonable debate and not making it sound like the corridor of a lunatic asylum where inmates scream insults at each other from padded cells whose walls are smeared with their faeces. Try to ignore personal attacks. This gets more difficult as debate heats up.

    So next time, I think you can pick a better target to pick on. I’m not offended by you choosing to pick on me this time around, but let me point out that that DOES say something about where your personal preferences lie in all this as well, like it or not, and that’s grist for the mill. You’ve just made it so. The abyss stares back.

    Not sure about the abyss metaphor, this seems a bit over stated.

    For the record my views on war in Ukraine are:

    -the United States and the west have a lot of responsibility for this mess. There is a strain of Russophobia in the west that made them interfere irresponsibly in the Ukraine both during and before the 2014 uprising. This is particularly tragic as Putin started his rule as someone who was relatively pro Western by Russian standards. If we had been more reasonable 20 years ago this mess could have been avoided and the West, the Ukraine and Russia would all be much better off. Russia is a natural ally.

    -Putin’s invasion of Ukraine was a horrible mistake. It has made relations with Ukraine unsalvagable and increased their traditional Russophobia, to say nothing of lives lost on either side.

    -Putin describing the Ukrainians as Nazis is both untrue and unhelpful. They may have accepted the participation of the Azov battalion, given the odds that they faced they could not afford to be picky. Once you describe your opponents as Nazis it it difficult to negotiate with them, they will be insulted and your supporters with see negotiations as a sell out.

    -the Russian push toward Kiev was a severe military set back for them. I am not sure about how they are doing in the south and west. It may be too soon to say.

    -Russian forces committed some atrocities during the push towards Kiev. It is unclear if they were systematic and came from the top or were the result of indiscipline at a lower level. There is evidence that most Russian units behaved correctly towards Ukrainian civilians and that the atrocities were committed by units including but not limited to Chechens.

    -Scott Ritters sex life has no bearing whatsoever on his opinions as a military commentator. I have no idea if he is any good being a military commentator though.

    -I would like to see a compromise settle the war as quickly as possible. I am more and more pessimistic about this happening.

    •ï¿½Replies: @HA
    @AKAHorace

    I picked you at random.

    Oh, come on. You might believe that. I don't. (And really, unless you don't know what the word random means, I don't think you do either).

    "As posters we can help support this by accompanying it with intelligent and reasonable debate and not making it sound like the corridor of a lunatic asylum..."

    We should probably also avoid trying to excuse or extenuate (or dismiss as merely "stupid") a serial sex offender's choice to repeatedly send pictures of his erection to declared 15-year-olds by offering "trending" expertise on certain child-rape roleplay communities. As if any of that makes any sense whatsoever. Furthermore, we should also avoid pretending any of that is "mainstream" in the least, lest we be outed as disturbed weirdos. Jus' saying. I think that might elevate the tone of the discussion far more than an over-reliance on the pejorative "fanboy" precisely because the fanboys find the term so grating. But the latter is what you, for some totally random reason, chose to focus on.

    "Scott Ritters sex life has no bearing whatsoever on his opinions as a military commentator."

    I suggest that with regard to a country run by an ex-KGB operative who has a reputation (put "water sports Putin Trump" into a search engine) for using Kompromat to keep his assets in line, any serial sex offenders with obviously poor impulse control and "gratification management" skills who presume to pass themselves off as experts on military analysis (or anything else) pertaining to Russia, and who write articles for RT.com like Ritter does, deserve far more scrutiny than they're getting here. The fact that I even have to explain that is mind-boggling at this point.

    And if none of that persuades you, I suspect that pointing out how ridiculously wrong he has been on this invasion issue time and time and again won't do much either, but feel free to check that out for yourself:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98TEqp7kToM

    The above Youtuber has a Macgregor analysis as well, and FWIW, he gives both these shills a far more even-handed hearing than I probably could at this point, though my exposure (ugh, I probably need a better word than that, given the Ritter context) to the two of them has been mostly second hand by way of the fanboys.

    Replies: @AKAHorace, @PhysicistDave, @PhysicistDave
    , @PhysicistDave
    @AKAHorace

    AKAHorace wrote to HA:

    I picked you at random.
    �
    Well, as you can see in my pal HA's response, it sort of does not work to try to tamp down HA's paranoia.

    It's more fun to just run with it.

    Horace also wrote:

    Russian forces committed some atrocities during the push towards Kiev. It is unclear if they were systematic and came from the top or were the result of indiscipline at a lower level. There is evidence that most Russian units behaved correctly towards Ukrainian civilians and that the atrocities were committed by units including but not limited to Chechens.
    �
    It's pretty much impossible to tell during wartime who committed the atrocities: the Russians claim it was the doing of the Kiev regime.

    Remember: the Allies discounted the atrocities committed by the Soviets in the Katyn Forest. It was only after the war that the West faced up to the reality -- and that was only when the Soviets had become our enemy, so it was easy to face the truth.

    And, for that matter, it was really dumb luck that we found out the truth about the My Lai massacre.

    We may never know the truth about who committed the war crimes in Ukraine.

    Horace also wrote:

    I would like to see a compromise settle the war as quickly as possible. I am more and more pessimistic about this happening.
    �
    Yes. Unfortunately it has been clear for the better part of a decade that the US is just using Ukraine as a catspaw against Russia, a point recently made explicit by SecDef Austin and POTUS Biden.

    There are however signs of unrest in Ukraine and there is a good deal of skepticism among the American people. Do not give up hope: the war will have to be ended by public fury and denunciations coming from the bottom up, both in Ukraine and the West.

    To put it bluntly, sweet reason and debate are not going to do it. Decent people need to vent their fury on the people who have done this -- from Zelensky to the top people in the US regime.

    Justified anger is both healthy and necessary.
  • "Once war is forced upon us, there is no alternative than to apply every available means to bring it to a swift end. War's very object is victory — not prolonged indecision." So said Gen. Douglas MacArthur in his April 1951 address to Congress after being fired by President Harry Truman as commander in chief...
  • @meamjojo
    @George 1

    Who gives a crap what a 3rd rate country like Russia and a dipshit president like Putin care about? We should give the Ukrainians enough firepower to push the Russians back out of their country, including Crimea. As to Putin being upset by countries joining NATO, here's how much we really care: [lol]
    ----------
    Blinken says US would ‘strongly support’ Swedish, Finnish NATO memberships
    04/28/22 6:53 PM ET

    Secretary of State Antony Blinken said on Thursday that the United States would “strongly support†Sweden and Finland should they decide to pursue membership in NATO.

    https://thehill.com/news/administration/3471008-blinken-says-us-would-strongly-support-swedish-finnish-nato-memberships/

    Replies: @Insouciant, @George 1

    Irony alert.

    meamjojo the Hasbara Hack tags Putin a “dipshit” contrasted with failed Rock-n-Roller Blinken (and presumably porn artist noZ-Elensky).

  • The Washington Post jumps on a new study of the genes and behaviors of thousands of dogs as opening another front in The War on Stereotypes: Looking for a well-behaved dog? Breed may not tell you much. Researchers found that breed alone explains very little about dog behavior and personality By Katie Shepherd Yesterday at...
  • @Anonymous
    @Fidelios Automata

    Pork tastes and smells like human flesh. Seriously.

    Replies: @Buffalo Joe

    EightSevenEight, and you know this how?

  • It is the opinion of most patriotic voices in Russian alt-media (remember, hardcore Russian patriots are still not allowed on mainstream media in Russia) that while the special operation in Ukraine is all well and good, there is no good explanation for why Ukraine was lost in the first place. How could the Kremlin let...
  • Blissex says:
    @MallochBrown
    Russia has been a threat to Britannia who believes she rules the waves and therefore the planet, but Russia owns the World Island and has the trump card over the "wave" card. Russia supported the 13 Colonies when King George tried to stifle the US! Payback is a bitch! Think about the cash supplied to the Bolsheviks, the blood of millions wasted on the Nazis, Churchill & Roosevelt & Cecil Rhodes progeny all playing A destabilizing game to maintain dominance over the potential of a dynamic modern Russia.......if Russians and the rest of us could but recognize the evil that has emanated from the City of London, the cost in human blood, which are pSacrifices by Mason's to Baal......they would cleanse the planet with a pair of rockets aimed on Hereford and the square mile!
    Rigging the US elections to bring in Brandon was Dominion Voting Systems (which were not connected to the web😜🤓) and Google Lord Malloch Brown: interference in US sovereignty was an act of war by MI 6.
    Europe needs "liberated" once again from these demons & eugenecists!

    Replies: @Blissex

    «all playing A destabilizing game to maintain dominance over the potential of a dynamic modern Russia»#

    It is Brzinski’s game, and before him that of Pilsudski:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prometheism
    «Prometheism or Prometheanism (Polish: Prometeizm) was a political project initiated by Józef PiÅ‚sudski, statesman of the Second Polish Republic from 1918 to 1935. Its aim was to weaken the Russian Empire and its successor states, including the Soviet Union, by supporting nationalist independence movements among the major non-Russian peoples that lived within the borders of Russia and the Soviet Union. Between the World Wars, Prometheism and PiÅ‚sudski’s other concept, of an “Intermarium federation”, constituted two complementary geopolitical strategies for him and for some of his political heirs. […] Marshal PiÅ‚sudski, who as early as 1904, in a memorandum to the Japanese government, pointed out the need to employ, in the struggle against Russia, the numerous non-Russian nations that inhabited the basins of the Baltic, Black and Caspian Seas»

  • "Once war is forced upon us, there is no alternative than to apply every available means to bring it to a swift end. War's very object is victory — not prolonged indecision." So said Gen. Douglas MacArthur in his April 1951 address to Congress after being fired by President Harry Truman as commander in chief...
  • @Wizard of Oz
    @JR Foley

    You discredit yourself with your pathological anti-Semitism. You have not the slightest evidence of Poroshenko and Zelinsky being Ziionists and this is what the Jewish Forward says about the rumour that Poroshenko was Jewish

    Jewish community leaders have remained officially neutral about the candidates, but many Ukrainian Jews support Poroshenko, a former foreign minister rumored to have Jewish roots.
    �

    According to the popular Russian television channel Russia-1, Poroshenko’s father was a Jew named Alexei Valtsman from the Odessa region who in 1956 took on the last name of his wife, Yevgenya Poroshenko.
    �

    Poroshenko’s media team did not reply to JTA requests for comment, but they are not indifferent about the subject.

    Last year, Poroshenko’s spokeswoman asked Forbes Israel to remove her boss’ name from a list of the world’s richest Jews, a magazine source confirmed.

    Moshe Azman, a chief rabbi of Ukraine, said he asked Poroshenko directly about the rumors.

    “He told me he wasn’t Jewish,†Azman saiid

    �
    Why do you mad antisemites do it?

    Replies: @Insouciant, @JR Foley

    Why do you mad antisemites do it?

    Why do people sling “antisemite” slur when the facts eviscerate all rational refutation?

    oh.
    this is WizofOz, not
    rational people.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    @Insouciant

    And doesn't worry you that those who share your willingness to make unfavourable generalisations about Jews discredit themselves as I showed that JRFoley did?

    I have a few Jewish friends only one of whom I would think twice about repeating, and asserting with approval, some of the more damning things I have picked up on UR about Israel, Zionism, the Jewish Lobby etc. In other words I know enough Jews to make nonsense of your "evicerating all rational refutation". If you want to make your antisemitism - which you have just plainly affirmed - intellectually respectable you should neither make up wild misstatements of fact, or defend those of others.

    Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  • The previous Open Thread has well over 1,000 comments and is getting a little sluggish, so here’s a new one for the Karlin Community. Just to kick it off, here are a couple of interviews I'd strongly recommend, one of British Prof. Richard Sakwa on the Grayzone, and the other of Scott Ritter you was...
  • A123 says: •ï¿½Website
    @Emil Nikola Richard
    @German_reader


    There’s a difference between giving Ukraine weapons so the entire country isn’t subjugated, and going on a crusade with overthrowing Putin as the end goal and expelling Russia even from Crimea and even the parts of Donbass held before February (areas whose inhabitants you’ve called a liability for Ukraine yourself in the past).
    �
    You aren't using your imagination. These bastards are such sick bastards they are giving Ukraine weapons to increase the max carnage. Nobody in power gives one bloody booger if all of Ukraine, Kiev, Lvov is obliterated.

    Replies: @Yellowface Anon, @A123

    You aren’t using your imagination. These bastards are such sick bastards they are giving Ukraine weapons to increase the max carnage. Nobody in power gives one bloody booger if all of Ukraine, Kiev, Lvov is obliterated.

    Again, the purpose of the WEF Elites is the maximization is MENA refugees flows. Infidel Ukrainians & Russians are 100% expendable. Kiev, Sebastopol, Lviv, Sochi… if they fall to carnage that is an acceptable price for making the EU less European.

    I know that neither side’s partisans want to hear it, but the TRUTH is the TRUTH. The fighting between Ukraine & Russia was deliberately engineered from the outside. It is a relatively tiny piece of a much larger struggle.

    PEACE 😇

  • From a UK.gov website: From the BBC in 2012: Britain's showmen: All the fun of the fair? By Emma Kasprzak BBC News Published12 April 2012 As the travelling fair season begins, fairground workers from all over Britain are heading out on to the road. But while their presence is familiar, what do we really know...
  • @AndrewR
    @al gore rhythms

    Interesting how Gypsies/Roma are considered white but Arabs and Jews aren't. Hmm...

    Replies: @Dream, @al gore rhythms

    Travellers are often called gypsy/Roma in Britain. The actual Romani have only recently started immigrating to Britain.

  • It is the opinion of most patriotic voices in Russian alt-media (remember, hardcore Russian patriots are still not allowed on mainstream media in Russia) that while the special operation in Ukraine is all well and good, there is no good explanation for why Ukraine was lost in the first place. How could the Kremlin let...
  • Blissex says:
    @Humbert Humbert
    @Levtraro

    Most are going West for the easy/easier life. I was helping this Ukranian girl to get her giant luggage off the train in Stuttgart beginning of April, and she only knew English, not German. Turns out, Germany is helping them relocate; DeutcheBahn - the main German train company - was transporting ukranian women/families for free (men aged 18-60 are forbidden from leaving ukraine), there was info station waiting for them at the station + volunteers. The same day I saw a smallish meeting in the center of Stuttgart where Ukranian flags were waived and stupid Germans were clapping to the pro-ukrop propaganda.
    I've got the feeling these 5 millions won't go back, ever, to Ukraine, no matter who's in power and they don't give a shit about their country which for the past 30 years is getting rekt by all kinds, but mostly Jewish oligarchs.

    Replies: @Levtraro, @Blissex

    «I was helping this Ukranian girl to get her giant luggage off the train in Stuttgart beginning of April, and she only knew English, not German. Turns out, Germany is helping them relocate»

    Germany has a huge natality problem, and german business and real estate owners want a lot more immigrants to keep wages low and rents high. Their fathers and grandfathers have been telling them how much money they made from turkish immigrants in the 50s and 60s, and they want to repeat that opportunity.

  • From KQED: The opening of the article is overstating many of the changes currently being considered, but that's indicative of which way the wind is blowing. When you abolish the use of admissions tests, as the University of California just did in order to let in more of The Diverse, you are immediately going to...
  • The transition from merit based grading to the ‘dumb down’ system of no accountability in education started in the 50’s. So who can we blame?

  • The previous Open Thread has well over 1,000 comments and is getting a little sluggish, so here’s a new one for the Karlin Community. Just to kick it off, here are a couple of interviews I'd strongly recommend, one of British Prof. Richard Sakwa on the Grayzone, and the other of Scott Ritter you was...
  • Beckow says:
    @AP
    @Beckow


    …The Finns would also have to lease the Hanko Peninsula!!!

    Tragic, how could they agree to it? And a 30-year lease, no less. Now you convinced me, it was worth for Finland to lose 100k soldiers and Vyborg
    �
    1. It proves that you lied as usual when you claimed that Soviet demands were limited to some territory near Leningrad.

    2. Between a large Soviet base only 86 miles west of Helsinki and a Soviet border shifted more from the eastern side Finland would have been much more vulnerable.

    Tell us more what the drunk Poles are saying in bars.
    �
    Those arms dealers weren't Poles...what they said about the tanks has been confirmed though.

    Replies: @Beckow

    Are you going psychotic again? Let it go, I was joking about the hot-oven dwellers of Finland.

    By the way, how do you know how “large” the “leased” Soviet base would be? Wouldn’t it be extremely vulnerable? More of a target than a threat? Kind of like a Nato base on the Azov See? Those who don’t learn from history will repeat it…

  • @utu
    @AP

    What is the message Germany is broadcasting since before the war? First it was do not supply Ukraine with weapons because Russia will win and now it is do not supply Ukraine with weapons because Ukraine may win. This is still the same message. They haven't learned anything.

    German_twat is on the level of those 'German intellectuals' like Alice Schwarzer and Alexander Kluge, Martin Walser, Reinhard Merkel, Reinhard Mey, Dieter Nuhr, Gerhard Polt, Edgar Selge, Antje Vollmer, Peter Weibel, Ranga Yogeshwar, Juli Zeh, Richard Precht who recently were recruited (possibly by circles around Scholz and/or Russian embassy) to write open letter to Scholz warning against provoking Putin in the slightest way and so on:


    “We therefore hope that you [Scholz] will remember your original position and that you will not, directly or indirectly, supply more heavy weapons to Ukraine. On the contrary, we urge you to do everything you can to ensure that a ceasefire is reached as soon as possible to a compromise that both sides can accept,â€

    The signatories emphasize that Putin broke international law by attacking Ukraine. But that doesn’t justify accepting the “risk of this war escalating into a nuclear conflict.†The delivery of large quantities of heavy weapons could make Germany itself a party to the war. “A Russian counter-attack could then trigger the case for assistance under the NATO treaty and thus the immediate danger of a world war.â€

    We warn against a two-fold error: Firstly, that the responsibility for the danger of an escalation to a nuclear conflict lies solely with the original aggressor and not also with those who see him with his eyes provide a motive for possibly criminal action. And on the other hand, that the decision on the moral responsibility of the further “costs†in human lives among the Ukrainian civilian population falls exclusively within the competence of their government. Morally binding norms are of a universal nature.â€
    �
    If they were not a part of Putin dupes and Putin agentur in Germany they could be well standing members in the new neo-pagan anti-Western cult that apparently took hold in Germany that 'nobody owes anybody anything' and that 'nobody owes Ukraine anything' in particular.

    Replies: @German_reader, @songbird, @AP, @Dmitry

    You are absolutely correct about the German intellectuals and the German state but our German Reader is better than them, he at least supports arming Ukraine.

    •ï¿½Disagree: utu
    •ï¿½Replies: @German_reader
    @AP


    and the German state
    �
    Germany sent Stinger missiles and anti-tank weapons almost immediately after the invasion.
    Apparently things like this as well:
    https://twitter.com/UAWeapons/status/1518681654562369544
    They've also sent Patriot batteries to Slovakia, so Slovakia will send its S-300 system to Ukraine, and similar arrangements are planned with Slovenia and T-72-like tanks. And now they're even intending to send German Gepard anti-air tanks to Ukraine.
    imo this entire "Germany isn't supporting Ukraine at all, yet financing Russia's war" narrative is nothing more than a fairly cynical media campaign.

    Replies: @AP
  • S says:
    @AP
    @S


    The US and UK are not the same nations they were in 1940, however, and things might not go quite as they’ve originally planned.
    �
    Russia is much weaker relative to the USSR of 1939 than the USA is it to the USA of 1939. Setting aside the late and post Soviet era decay, Russia is only about half of the USSR.

    Replies: @Mikhail, @S

    The US and UK are not the same nations they were in 1940, however, and things might not go quite as they’ve originally planned.

    Russia is much weaker relative to the USSR of 1939 than the USA is it to the USA of 1939. Setting aside the late and post Soviet era decay, Russia is only about half of the USSR.

    Thanks, AP. I should clarify, however, what I meant about the US and the UK not being the same as in 1940.

    The demographics for the US are of course quite different now. I think for the worse. The UK, particularly England, seems to be deliberately destroying it’s own Anglo-Saxon power base. So the US and UK are weaker in that sense than they were imo.

    In their blinding hubris, some large segments of the US and UK elites and their hangers on may think, even so, that a WWIII with Russia will be a repeat of WWII with Germany, where relatively speaking, the US and UK (though particularly the US) got off a lot lighter than many other countries in regards to damage sustained and casualties incurred.

    That might well change quite a bit this go around. That is what I was getting at. No doubt the elites who thought it would all be ‘a cakewalk’ with Russia would be shocked.

    Some of the upper tier of the US and UK elites seem to know better and are planning accordingly. I think the stories of the extensive blast and radiation proof underground shelters, the kind with a ten year supply of food, water, oxygen, entertainment facilities, etc, built in Southern portions of the globe for the ultra wealthy and powerful, are probably true.

    Anyhow, the US in the last years of the Trump administration increased US internal steel production capabilities and with fracking, has made the US entirely capable of being wholly oil independent from the Mideast and elsewhere. I think this was in preparation for WWIII.

    I think after a relatively short conventional war with Russia (and China, Iran, N Korea, etc,) this war would go nuclear, as long planned.

    What to do?

    First and foremost, people in the US and UK, ie the Anglosphere, where much of this is emanating from, should refuse and stand down in regards to any support for this war.

    Though certainly more difficult for people in Ukraine and Russia at present, where things are quite a bit ‘hotter’, and seemingly counter-intuitive, I would suggest the same. I would perhaps say different if I thought any of the parties involved were fighting ‘on their terms’, but I don’t see it. I instead see various peoples being manipulated into this war against their own interest, with the objective being ultimately that they be destroyed.

    And pray. And not necessarily in that order.

    •ï¿½Replies: @AP
    @S


    Thanks, AP. I should clarify, however, what I meant about the US and the UK not being the same as in 1940.

    The demographics for the US are of course quite different now. I think for the worse.
    �
    There are currently 204 million white Americans, out of a total US population of 330 million (not that non-whites are of zero military value).

    In 1939 the total population of the USA was 131 million. And America's military built up quite a lot compared to 1939. In 1939 the US army had 174,000 soldiers. Today it has 485,00 soldiers. This does not count reserves or national guard.

    UK has 67 million people compared to 46 million in 1939. It's military is probably worse now, though it does have its own nukes.

    USSR had 168 million people in 1939. Russian federation has only 145 million. It is now at war with what had been the second most populous part of the USSR. Its military, though better than it had bee in the 90s, is worse than it had been in 1939. In 1939 the Red Army numbered 1.8 million soldiers. Today's Russia's ground forces numbered 285,000 troops (this does not include national guard or reserves).

    So compared to 1939, Russia is in a much worse position vis a vis the Anglo world in terms of both populations and military might. Not even close.

    First and foremost, people in the US and UK, ie the Anglosphere, where much of this is emanating from, should refuse and stand down in regards to any support for this war.
    �
    US and UK should not be directly or openly involved but they should provide maximum assistance to Ukraine as long as Russian troops are on Ukrainian soil (and make clear that once Russia is chased away from Ukraine support will no longer be necessary as the task will have been achieved). Provide what Soviets provided for Vietnam (they gave Vietnam around 400 Migs). Turn Ukraine into a woodchipper for Russian soldiers where Russia will get bloodied for going where it does not belong, until Russia chooses to pull its hand out of the machine. It will thus be completely Russia's choice, how much of its soldiers and expensive equipment it wants to waste. Ukraine and its western-supplied arms aren't going into Russia (except in rare cases on the border, linked to the invasion of Ukraine), Russia is getting its people and equipment wasted in Ukraine in a way that is totally of Russia's choosing.

    Replies: @Yellowface Anon, @S
  • Fr0m the New York Times Science section: Anglo-Saxon Kings Made Sure to Eat Their Vegetables, Study Shows Contrary to popular belief, the ruling classes gorged on meat only on rare occasions, according to an analysis of more than 2,000 skeletons buried during medieval times. By Maria Cramer April 29, 2022 Anglo-Saxon kings have long reigned...
  • megabar says:

    > A chemical analysis of the bones suggests that meat

    I’m curious what this analysis consists of, and how reliable it really is — as opposed to how reliable the article wants you to believe. There are a lot of ways this type of analysis could be in error, even if done in good faith.

    We do know that lots of mammals thrive as carnivores, that mammals share a lot of their metabolic pathways, and that humans instinctively prefer to eat meat often.

  • It is the opinion of most patriotic voices in Russian alt-media (remember, hardcore Russian patriots are still not allowed on mainstream media in Russia) that while the special operation in Ukraine is all well and good, there is no good explanation for why Ukraine was lost in the first place. How could the Kremlin let...
  • @Ace
    @Levtraro

    The Azov types are acting like hooligans and such people cannot be the backbone of anything with popular support or military competence. Thugs like to shoot people in the legs, hold hostages, and gun down civilians heedless of the consequences, just for sheer bloody mindedness. No decent man wants to fight alongside or under such trash.

    Replies: @Commentator Mike

    The West fully support all this. No criticism there of any of this.

  • Fr0m the New York Times Science section: Anglo-Saxon Kings Made Sure to Eat Their Vegetables, Study Shows Contrary to popular belief, the ruling classes gorged on meat only on rare occasions, according to an analysis of more than 2,000 skeletons buried during medieval times. By Maria Cramer April 29, 2022 Anglo-Saxon kings have long reigned...
  • Anonymous[361] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous
    But the Norman kings and Barons, and their successors who took over England in 1066 were, for sure, big meat eaters.
    Basically, they expropriated all of England's land for themselves and lived high of the hog. In particular, they were very fond of hunting, in the vast dedicated forests they exclusively enclosed for themselves. Deer meat is still called 'venison' - that is 'hunted meat' in the UK.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    In particular, they were very fond of hunting, in the vast dedicated forests they exclusively enclosed for themselves

    That isn’t quite true. In royal forests, certain types of game were forbidden to be hunted (deer & boar typically) but other game could be freely taken.

  • The previous Open Thread has well over 1,000 comments and is getting a little sluggish, so here’s a new one for the Karlin Community. Just to kick it off, here are a couple of interviews I'd strongly recommend, one of British Prof. Richard Sakwa on the Grayzone, and the other of Scott Ritter you was...
  • AP says:
    @Beckow
    @AP


    ...The Finns would also have to lease the Hanko Peninsula!!!
    �
    Tragic, how could they agree to it? And a 30-year lease, no less. Now you convinced me, it was worth for Finland to lose 100k soldiers and Vyborg. The Hanko peninsula was preserved.

    Tell us more what the drunk Poles are saying in bars. When are they finally marching on Moscow? Or at least Minsk or Kaliningrad? Tell them not to forget the horses.

    Replies: @AP

    …The Finns would also have to lease the Hanko Peninsula!!!

    Tragic, how could they agree to it? And a 30-year lease, no less. Now you convinced me, it was worth for Finland to lose 100k soldiers and Vyborg

    1. It proves that you lied as usual when you claimed that Soviet demands were limited to some territory near Leningrad.

    2. Between a large Soviet base only 86 miles west of Helsinki and a Soviet border shifted more from the eastern side Finland would have been much more vulnerable.

    Tell us more what the drunk Poles are saying in bars.

    Those arms dealers weren’t Poles…what they said about the tanks has been confirmed though.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Beckow
    @AP

    Are you going psychotic again? Let it go, I was joking about the hot-oven dwellers of Finland.

    By the way, how do you know how "large" the "leased" Soviet base would be? Wouldn't it be extremely vulnerable? More of a target than a threat? Kind of like a Nato base on the Azov See? Those who don't learn from history will repeat it...
  • This video is available on Rumble. Elon Musk has bought Twitter and lefties are terrified because Mr. Musk calls himself a “free speech absolutist.†Nothing scares the Left more than letting everyone talk. “The NAACP calls for Musk to keep Trump off Twitter.†It said that if he returns, “lives are at risk, and so...
  • HdC says:
    @Realist
    @HdC


    Agreed, but how? How do those not in control, take control in an acceptable way?
    �
    In an acceptable way??? For who? The only acceptable way is the way that destroys the current control.

    I certainly do not advocate kinetic revolution...
    �
    So you have no ideas...you are willing to accept the current situation?

    Replies: @HdC

    Certainly I have ideas; withdrawing one’s labours being the most powerful idea I can think of in a capitalist economy ie. the western world. This is what I mean by “acceptable way” because it is legal and powerful.

    I stated that this was not likely to happen because 50% of the workers live from pay check to pay check.

    Another idea that may be worth pursuing is to write a letter to your representative that lists your concerns. In its conclusion simply state that unless your concerns are addressed in a meaningful way, you will contribute and volunteer for one of the opposing candidates.

    This method is imminently scale-able and, who knows, may catch on.

    What ideas do you have, one that won’t get you killed or put into prison?

    •ï¿½Replies: @Realist
    @HdC


    Certainly I have ideas; withdrawing one’s labours being the most powerful idea I can think of in a capitalist economy ie. the western world. This is what I mean by “acceptable way†because it is legal and powerful.

    I stated that this was not likely to happen because 50% of the workers live from pay check to pay check.
    �
    So that idea is useless.

    Another idea that may be worth pursuing is to write a letter to your representative that lists your concerns. In its conclusion simply state that unless your concerns are addressed in a meaningful way, you will contribute and volunteer for one of the opposing candidates.
    �
    In no way will the electoral system play a part in the salvation of this country.

    What ideas do you have, one that won’t get you killed or put into prison?
    �
    I'm in my upper seventies...I'm not going to do anything...except laugh at the dumb bastards that think voting will solve anything. Here is a hint the solution may well get many killed or put into prison...it depends on how far the Deep State wants to take it.

    If there are not enough people in this country willing to die or be put in prison to save this country...then so be it.

    Replies: @HdC, @Bro43rd
  • The good news we've learned since Russian invaded Ukraine back on February 24 is that Russia is militarily weaker than most people expected. The future is unwritten, so this could change with time. After all, the Red Army that invaded Finland in November 1939 was a lot less competent than the Red Army that invaded...
  • @HA
    @JimDandy

    “Many 18 year old girls who are into DDLG (which was trending around the time of Ritters’ troubles) fantasize that they are 4 or 5 years old....I interjected by bringing up the subject of a fairly trendy sexual zeitgeist “kink†known as DDLG (there have been memoirs on the subject that were widely reviewed in the MSM)"

    Fairly trendy Zeitgeist, you say? MSM, you say? No, all that might have been trendy in your odd little corner of the "zeit", but the fact that you are aroused (or at least titillated enough to pay rapt attention and take mental notes as to "trending" that remain in your head 10-20 years later) by the notion that a sexual partner is "4 or 5 years old", as you put it, is not in the least mainstream. If we were talking about 50 Shades of Gray, or the schoolgirl uniforms in that Britney video, or that HBO series starring the shaggy-looking thing who is the love interest in Dune -- all that does indeed qualify as mainstream, alas, regardless of what that says about our culture. I'll give you that. I guess if you need your partner to dress up like a Harry Potter character before the two of you get it on, that might also be "trending". But getting aroused by the idea of having sex with 4-5 year olds to the extent that you'd want a sex partner to dress and act like that in order to turn you on? I have no idea how you got the notion that that was ever mainstream, but then, I'm guessing Scott Ritter would likewise claim it's totally "mainstream" for a 30-40 year-old man to be sending photos of his erection to declared 15-year-olds, so it's no wonder the two of you see eye to eye on things like that. After all, the only condemnation you can manage to muster for him is to admit that what he did (even after being convicted of it once before, let's keep in mind) was an "uncharacteristically stupid".... "sexual entanglement".

    If that's all you can say, I guess it's no wonder you would think that role-play in which you wind up raping a "4 or 5 years old" "little girl" is mainstream. (And yes, PhysicistDave, just in case you're reading this, fantasizing about having sex with any 4 or 5-year-old is fantasizing about rape. I hope at least that is something I won't have to explain for you, and if I do, well, I pity your poor daughter even more than I previously did.)

    As for you, JimDandy, go ahead and keep laying it all out there. I mean, if your only alternative is to put on a raincoat and go to a playground (which at this point wouldn't surprise me) then by all means, you might as well keep scratching that exhibitionist itch here.

    As for anyone else, let that serve as the nail in the coffin as far as the "Scott Ritter is still credible on other stuff" meme goes. But should anyone else want to keep trying to run that one by me, hopefully they'll find something less creepy to offer than JimDandy just did.

    Replies: @JimDandy

    BTW, lil fella–“MSM” stands for Mainstream Media. They should have taught you that in Hasbara school.

  • From KQED: The opening of the article is overstating many of the changes currently being considered, but that's indicative of which way the wind is blowing. When you abolish the use of admissions tests, as the University of California just did in order to let in more of The Diverse, you are immediately going to...
  • turtle says:
    @Rex Little
    @Rich


    From what I’ve read, a female applying to MIT is treated as an underrepresented minority and is given preference over males who score 20 points higher.
    �
    Very likely. 50 years ago women were less than 10% of the undergraduate student body. Now they're over 40%.

    Replies: @turtle

    No idea what goes on today.
    In the late 1960s, as I recall, the M/F ratio was approximately 17/1, which was limited by housing.
    https://mccormick.mit.edu/about/mccormick-history

    MIT’s admissions policy at the time dictated that the number of women
    admitted to MIT should be limited by the amount of housing available to them. The MIT administration claimed that, as McCormick grew overcrowded, they would be “[forced] again to apply more rigorous standards in the selection of female than of male applicants.â€

    It was not until 1970 that MIT (under pressure from a growing number of female applicants) changed its admission policy, stating for the first time that female applicants should be judged solely on their merits rather than on the capacity of McCormick Hall. This change increased the number of women from 7.6% (Fall 1969) to 9.4% (Fall 1970) of the freshman class

    None of the dorms were officially coed in those days. Although, contrary to official policy, you could keep your mistress in old East Campus (much to the chagrin of Dean K.R. Wadleigh), you just had to keep it on the down low.

    The Tech coeds I knew were extremely bright. One in particular is one of the few people I have met about whom I could say, without question, “This person is smarter than I am.” Legend has it she consumed a six pack of Budweiser while she wrote her 18.02 exam (3 hours, in the Armory), and earned a “B” in the class, which was multivariate and vector integral calculus. I did not see this with my own eyes, as I took 18.02 the year before (I am class of 1970, she was class of 1971).

    I also got a “B” in 18.02, but I could not have done so under the influence of alcohol. Freshman calculus lectures were given by Professor Arthur P. Mattuck, who was quite a good lecturer, although the “standard” 18.01 and 18.02 were less rigorous than my high school calculus class. I really should have tested out of 18.01, but allowed myself to be intimidated by the idea of em eye tee, so did not even take the AP exam.

    Prof. Mattuck generally assigned more problems than anyone could be expected to do. Hence the saying, “drinking from a fire hose.” My experience was that the lecturers were quite good, in all classes, but the recitation instructors varied in teaching ability. Some were quite good (tip of the hat to Carl Mazza in freshman chemistry) but others pretty much sucked, probably because they did not want to be there, but needed the TA stipend.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Rex Little
    @turtle


    I am class of 1970
    �
    Hey, so was I. I wonder if we knew each other in person. Probably not, unless you lived in Bexley (which, by the way, did officially go coed sometime in the early 70s).

    Replies: @turtle
    , @MrE3001
    @turtle

    The rule is: If you study drunk/high, then you have to take the test drunk/high.
  • Fr0m the New York Times Science section: Anglo-Saxon Kings Made Sure to Eat Their Vegetables, Study Shows Contrary to popular belief, the ruling classes gorged on meat only on rare occasions, according to an analysis of more than 2,000 skeletons buried during medieval times. By Maria Cramer April 29, 2022 Anglo-Saxon kings have long reigned...
  • @Steve Sailer
    @R.G. Camara

    Speaking of meat-eating, Sir Walter Scott famously pointed out that English has two sets of words for meats, the Anglo-Saxon word used by the farmers who raised the meat (e.g., cow) and the Norman French world used by the people who ate the meat (e.g., beef).

    Replies: @R.G. Camara, @EdwardM, @AKAHorace, @Nicholas Stix, @Reg Cæsar

    …the Anglo-Saxon word used by the farmers who raised the meat (e.g., cow) and the Norman French word used by the people who ate the meat (e.g., beef).

    Which made it back across the Channel as the insult rosbif.

    The Tim Traveller, a Brit who majored in French, in Paris, explains here how the French guard against the ultimate Pommie insult.

  • The good news we've learned since Russian invaded Ukraine back on February 24 is that Russia is militarily weaker than most people expected. The future is unwritten, so this could change with time. After all, the Red Army that invaded Finland in November 1939 was a lot less competent than the Red Army that invaded...
  • Hunsdon says:
    @PhysicistDave
    @Jack D

    Jack D wrote:

    But Putin (and Putin alone – no one “forced†him) chose to start a war because he didn’t think that was enough.
    �
    You should stop lying: as you know perfectly good and well, Putin did not start this war.

    The puppet regime in Kiev started the war in 2014 when the Donbass chose not to submit after the putsch engineered by your hero, the evil Victoria Nuland.

    Putin merely decided to end the war.

    Was it wise for him to do so? Maybe not -- I certainly have my doubts.

    But Putin did not start this war.

    Stop lying.

    Replies: @Hunsdon, @Pixo

    Brother Dave:

    I am pretty much 100% on your side, and I have wanted to chime in and let you know that I appreciate your persistence in fighting what I regard as the good fight. You seem to take the high road, and for that I applaud you.

    The reason I write, just now, is to point out that you may be falling in to one of the errors that so many people in the West are: assuming that this is Putin’s war.

    Now, I have no advanced degree in Kremlinology, but from the reading I have done in the past couple of decades, the idea that Ukraine in NATO is a red line is not just a VVP thing, it is a Russian government thing. It is a Russian military thing. It is a Russian societal thing. (We can, of course, debate whether this is a rational belief or an irrational one, but it seems to be a consistent theme among the people that run Russia.)

    Keep fighting the good fight. You are not alone.

    Hunsdon

    •ï¿½Thanks: PhysicistDave
  • “We are survival machines-robot vehicles blindly programmed to preserve the selfish molecules known as genes.†This is Richard Dawkins in The Selfish Gene. His selfish gene theory, he remarked in 1989, “has become textbook orthodoxy,†because it is merely “a logical outgrowth of orthodox Neo-Darwinism, but expressed as a novel image.†The image is misleading....
  • @ThreeCranes
    Similar musings have led me to postulate that Nietzsche was the last, great, Christian theologian.

    It doesn't surprise me that Jewish biologists have the most trouble with accepting the principle of Elan Vital. Jews aren't particularly smart people. For them, all of life is in the nature of a bargain. Recall, Job wrangling with God about how he had made all the correct sacrifices, observed all the outward rituals and yet still, God had the temerity to heap shit upon him. "What kind of God is that!" the archetypal Jew asks, expecting his encounter with the world to be akin with bartering in the marketplace.

    There was one Jew though, Albert Einstein, who, through his study of European science, came to a hazy understanding of the Superior European Intellect which had formulated the fundamental principles of Nature. And he, admitting that all that he had seen had come from standing upon the shoulders of European Giants, came closest to acknowledging the vast gulf that separates European consciousness from the small-mindedness of Gould and the like.

    Jewish biologists will never understand that the complexities of living organisms cannot have arisen from chance processes, that there must be a wellspring, an impetus for natural selection to act upon, that life is as much about pushing out as it is hedging in. Evolution is not merely a process of chiseling away what is not needed by a blind sculptor.

    One either sees this or doesn't. It's a spiritual capacity which Jews seem deficient in. The moment one proposes this sort of thing, Jews go off on a tangent about an Intelligent Designer as though such were a personal God etc. They can't let their imagination expand and must instead immediately reduce the concept to something tangible. This is why I claim they are not really smart. They can't withstand the dynamic tension involved in suspending judgement, but must posit a Thing, a something they can deride and mock. But what they mock is a shibboleth that is the product of their own limited and limiting imagination.

    Why can't they accept that there may be processes which are currently beyond their understanding? How can we move forward in the true spirit of science if we are not open minded? This is why I don't expect much scientific advancement from our future totally-Jewish dominated USA. They are a dogmatic people.

    Replies: @Mefobills, @Anonymous, @HallParvey, @inspector general

    Ever hear of Henri Bergson? A Jewish thinker who took “elan vital” very seriously.

  • There is technically still some possibility that the Elon Musk deal to purchase Twitter and reinstate freedom of speech could fall through, but this does not appear likely. What appears likely is that he is going to take over the company, and then probably be put in prison a few days or weeks later. However,...
  • @Not Important
    @dogbumbreath

    Why the hell would he spend gorillions of shekels to buy Twitter only to have it stay the same or get worse? He's ridiculous and largely a fraud, but I don't think he's that ridiculous.

    Replies: @dogbumbreath

    Why the hell would he spend gorillions of shekels to buy Twitter only to have it stay the same or get worse?

    ALL shekels earned through the stock market and not hard labor. What eles is Elon to do with this free money? Buy gold, a rocket or an electric sports car. Using it to buy a “social media” platform with reach isn’t bad investment. Consider the future advertising and brainwashing possibilities for the masses courtesy of Elon and company. It’s not about “free speech”. It’s about controlling perception according to Government Law .

  • From Homeland Security Today: If you can't trust an intersectionalist, who can you trust? Okaaaaaay ...
  • @Corvinus
    @Steve Sailer

    Mr. Sailer, you are part and parcel to this cottage industry.

    Misinformation: You think it's true, but it's not
    vs.
    Disinformation: You know it's not true, but you say it anyway.

    Example—MTG recently stated that the Catholic Church is controlled by Satan.

    Example—From Jim DeMint. Fellow Conservative: The Left is sick. There's no other explanation. The Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy to sexualize young children, long hidden, is now out in the open for all.

    And from someone you read, but can’t admit to it to your base. Too explosive. “It only took an hour for former intelligence agent and current insurrectionist Jack Posobiec to not only get “Ministry of Truth†trending but to get a *sitting member of Congress* to falsely put *quotes* around the phrase as though it is anything but a far-right fever dream. Just as Posobiec knew he was lying—i.e, spreading disinformation—about this new DHS initiative, the many members of Congress from the Republican Party who took up his false “Ministry of Truth†meme *also* knew they were lying (spreading disinformation about disinformation). So no, the federal government is *not* going to be monitoring mere “misinformation,†which as a free-standing word simply means inaccurate data. Nor will we let America turn into what Jack Posobiec and his allies want it to be: like Russia, where *accurate* data is policed.â€

    And, check this out—the news/politics social media platforms in the US will be controlled by Trump (TS), Musk (Twitter), Jason Miller (GETTR), Zuckerberg (FB/IG), Andrew Torba (Gab), and Candace Owens’ husband George Farmer (Parler).

    Replies: @Thrallman, @Curle

    “which as a free-standing word simply means inaccurate data.â€

    Good grief.

    Interpreted by free standing people?

  • The Washington Post jumps on a new study of the genes and behaviors of thousands of dogs as opening another front in The War on Stereotypes: Looking for a well-behaved dog? Breed may not tell you much. Researchers found that breed alone explains very little about dog behavior and personality By Katie Shepherd Yesterday at...
  • @Corvinus
    @Almost Missouri

    It’s not word at all, especially when the dog is trained to act in a certain manner.

    https://law.lclark.edu/live/files/32171-25-1-third-articlepdf

    In the early 20th century, pit bulls were considered “prototypical American pets.†They appeared in recruiting posters for both World War I and World War II, nicknamed “America’s Dog.†The first dog to receive an army medal was a pit bull. Featured in The Little Ras- cals and Buster Brown ads—pit bulls, known as “nanny dogs†for their affectionate disposition and tolerance towards children—were part of Americana.

    Though once a favorite family dog, the pit bull breed began to fall into disrepute beginning in the 1980s. A series of reports on rising crime rates surfaced during this period, connecting “attacks by ‘pit bulls’ to gang violence by urban youths.†By 1987, law enforcement announced that, “Street dope dealers and street gangs have gone to pit bulls.â€

    Pit bulls were swept up into the War on Drugs, with studies reporting that “in two out of three narcotics raids, pit bulls were used as the guard dogs.†Through this line of media narrative, pit bulls themselves became “carriers of the contagion of criminality.†“The American pit bull terrier has become a reflection of ourselves that no one cares very much to see,†one author wrote. These dogs came to represent a very different America from the one they portrayed decades earlier, splashed in red, white, and blue on draft recruiting posters.

    Conflicting research exists with respect to whether pit bulls do, in fact, present a higher risk of injury to humans. Some studies suggest that they are responsible for a disproportionate number of fatal dog attacks. Other studies, however, find that pit bulls are no more dan- gerous than other breeds that are not included under such bans and, in fact, may be less dangerous. A 2013 American Veterinary Medical Association Study examining fatal attacks from the last decade found that a valid determination of breed was only possible in 17.6% of these cases, and found no increased risk from pit bulls.

    However, DogsBite .org, a pro-BSL group, found that pit bulls were responsible for 65.6% of fatal attacks during a similar time period. One possible explanation for these significant discrepancies is the studies’ varying methodologies. Critics of BSL argue that increased safety concerns about pit bulls are largely the result of reporting bias: Some research has shown that animals that have bitten are more likely to be identified as pit bulls or pit bull mixes after the fact.

    In addition, significantly more media attention is given to attacks involving dogs identified as pit bulls than to those involving other breeds. Pro-BSL studies, by and large, tend to rely on surveys of media reports to generate their estimates. Aside from statistics, a certain cultural mythology exists around pit bulls. Many believe that they are not only more vicious than other dogs, but more powerful and deadly. Part of this attribution is owed to their association with dogfighting. Such thinking is echoed in many of the court decisions regarding BSL.

    Replies: @Almost Missouri

    It’s not w[ei]rd at all, especially when the dog is trained to act in a certain manner.

    Okay, take your pick: it’s either the breed or the owners. Either way, you lose.

    In the early 20th century, pit bulls were considered “prototypical American pets.â€

    As other commenters have pointed out, an entire breed can be established in just three decades. Likewise a breed can be ruined in the same period. Three times that period has elapsed since the putative halcyon days of the American Staffordshire Terrier, and the ghetto pit pup breeders have indeed been furiously working their black magic on the breed during that time.

    For you second, third and fourth major paragraphs: citation needed, as the wikifags say.

    For your fourth, fifth and sixth major paragraphs, you complain that you don’t like how others have identified biters’ breeds, but you never say what the correct identification should be. Somebody is biting all those thousands of people and pets. If it’s not the pit bulls everybody else is seeing, who is it? Call us back when you and OJ find the “real killers”.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Corvinus
    @Almost Missouri

    “Okay, take your pick: it’s either the breed or the owners. Either way, you lose.“

    According to Who/Whom?

    “and the ghetto pit pup breeders have indeed been furiously working their black magic on the breed during that time.“

    Right, nurture at work.

    “For you second, third and fourth major paragraphs: citation needed, as the wikifags say. For your fourth, fifth and sixth major paragraphs…â€

    Those paragraphs come directly from the source I cited, which is fully sourced.

    Replies: @Almost Missouri
  • The good news we've learned since Russian invaded Ukraine back on February 24 is that Russia is militarily weaker than most people expected. The future is unwritten, so this could change with time. After all, the Red Army that invaded Finland in November 1939 was a lot less competent than the Red Army that invaded...
  • Hunsdon says:
    @HA
    @James B. Shearer

    "I think being fooled by an undercover cop pretending to be a 15 year old girl suggests a certain level of gullibility..."

    I think it also raises the possibility that he's been fooled or "Kompromat-ized" by a catfishing RUSSIAN more than just twice (i.e. the number of times he was taken in by the catfishing cop), and now understands that if he were to deviate from the RT narrative, there would be repercussions of the kind he's already (twice-over) familiar with.

    Replies: @Hunsdon

    Anyone who disagrees with the clear-eyed, well-informed take of HA is a bought and paid for shill of the Kremlin! Jack D chimes in with saying that people who disagree with the clear-eyed, well-informed take of HA (and Jack D, let us not forget) just hates America! Or possibly we’re all confused by our homosexual desire to sniff Putin’s jockstrap.

    People can come to different conclusions about the probable outcome of events, and the underlying reason events have arisen.

    Now, maybe a) I am a bought and paid for Kremlin shill, or b) I am just an idiot, or c) I am so bewildered by my homoerotic fantasies of VVP that I cannot help myself, but it is also possible that d) I just have come to different conclusions than Steve Sailer, HA, Jack D, Bardon Kaldion and a few others here.

    •ï¿½Replies: @HA
    @Hunsdon

    "Anyone who disagrees with the clear-eyed, well-informed take of HA is a bought and paid for shill of the Kremlin!:

    No, Hundson (and for some reason, I see you've stopped referring to yourself in the third person; good for you -- I always thought that was pretentiously lame). Anyway, how many times do I have to tell you, the full fine print behind every utterance of fanboy is "paid agent, fellow traveler, OR USEFUL IDIOT"?

    I tried to format that so you could see where in that category I'm guessing you fall, but pick whichever alternative suits you, if paid shill offends you so.

    Replies: @JimDandy
  • From a UK.gov website: From the BBC in 2012: Britain's showmen: All the fun of the fair? By Emma Kasprzak BBC News Published12 April 2012 As the travelling fair season begins, fairground workers from all over Britain are heading out on to the road. But while their presence is familiar, what do we really know...
  • @Almost Missouri
    @Wilkey

    Almost as if Anglo-American culture were taking on the once-scorned caste system of England's former Hindu colony.

    Invade the world, invite the world's reverse cultural colonization?

    Something karmic?

    Replies: @Gordo, @Mr. Anon

    Invade the world, invite the world’s reverse cultural colonization?

    Invade the World. Invite the World. Incorporate the World.

  • Is The Babylon Bee out of Twitter Jail for naming the Biden Admin.'s Admiral Levine, a former high school linebacker, its Man of the Year? That ban appears to have been the straw that broke the back of Elon Musk's patience. Perhaps Twitter insiders, or just a couple of workers, did it to goad Musk...
  • I see Musk has put his foot in it again.

    He tweeted that Wellbutrin (an antidepressant drug with low sexual side effects) ought to be withdrawn from the market, because his dinner-party friends had told him it made them feel suicidal.

    Of course anybody might feel free to Tweet such a remark, but when you are a billionaire whose every Tweet gets checked by journalists and reported on, don’t you think it would be a good idea to STFU and think about how thousands of mentally ill people who are taking this medication could be adversely affected. Then perhaps you could finance some studies into the relative effectiveness and usefulness of various antidepressants and have your results published in a reputable scientific forum.

    Does Twitter freedom of speech now mean that Musk is a doctor and that he can now Tweet lists of Musk-approved medications to his audience of adoring Teslaheads?

    Seems like Twitter NEEDS some kind of censorship to protect asshole billionaires like Musk from making complete fools of themselves.

    BTW I have no personal opinion as to whether Wellbutrin is a useful drug, let alone whether it makes people feel more suicidal than before they went to their doctor for an antidepressant. If Musk wants to amend the medical insurance policies of his own employees so that they cannot be prescribed this drug, then let it be so.

  • From KQED: The opening of the article is overstating many of the changes currently being considered, but that's indicative of which way the wind is blowing. When you abolish the use of admissions tests, as the University of California just did in order to let in more of The Diverse, you are immediately going to...
  • @Inquiring Mind
    @ScarletNumber

    Hey, doesn't Professor Greenspun have a blog where he describes his second career as a pilot for one of the regional carriers flying one of those small two-engine jets like the Embraer or the Canadair?

    Didn't iSteve just post something about "eliminating grades" in the qualification and training to fly paying passengers around in a jet?

    Replies: @Bill Jones

    Didn’t iSteve just post something about “eliminating grades†in the qualification and training to fly paying passengers around in a jet?

    iSteve had a piece about increasing the diversity of the pilotage. What sort of racist do you have to be to assume that would mean “eliminating grades”?

    I’m asking for a friend.

    btw, for some reason a pass/fail test for airline pilots sounds like something you could sell tickets to.

  • The good news we've learned since Russian invaded Ukraine back on February 24 is that Russia is militarily weaker than most people expected. The future is unwritten, so this could change with time. After all, the Red Army that invaded Finland in November 1939 was a lot less competent than the Red Army that invaded...
  • @HA
    @Hunsdon

    "Personally, I have a vastly different interpretation of events, "

    Yes, I remember -- as you keep telling us over and over, you're able to chug down endless amounts of RT propaganda "по руÑÑки", as they say. Good for you. And you say you have a vastly different interpretation of events? Какой Ñюрприз!

    Replies: @Hunsdon

    Well, lying and ad hominem attacks, but hey, HA, you could be right about everything. I guess we’ll see.

    •ï¿½LOL: JimDandy
  • The previous Open Thread has well over 1,000 comments and is getting a little sluggish, so here’s a new one for the Karlin Community. Just to kick it off, here are a couple of interviews I'd strongly recommend, one of British Prof. Richard Sakwa on the Grayzone, and the other of Scott Ritter you was...
  • @AP
    @Beckow


    That’s what I said: the initial demand was to move the border by 30-40 miles away from St.Petersburg. The Karelian Isthmus is very narrow land between Lake Ladoga and Gulf – it overlooked St. Petrersburg, in a war Finland could lob bombs at will. The few tiny islands are specs of land in the St. Petersburg harbour. You make it sound menacing, but it was relatively reasonable.
    �
    The Finns would also have to lease the Hanko Peninsula for 30 years and to permit the Soviets to establish a military base there.

    This is only 86 miles from Helsinki. It is west of Helsinki, very far from the Soviet border.

    :::::::::::::::::

    BTW I heard about the Polish tanks and the process of their procurement, at a bar in Poland a couple weeks ago. I didn't publicly say what was told to me until it became widely known now, nor will I say other things I heard until they become widely known (if they do). But it was nice to get confirmation that it wasn't all just drunken empty boasting.

    Replies: @Beckow, @LatW

    in Poland a couple weeks ago

    That photo you posted of the Patriot missiles there was really cool. Thanks for posting that.

    •ï¿½Thanks: AP
  • There are two popular clips going around on social media this week of Russians talking about the inevitability of nuclear war. They are both from Russia 1, which is state television. Remember that RT is also Russian state media, and not really very well-edited, in terms of promoting a consistent agenda, so given the “shrugâ€...
  • @anonymous

    Threatening to nuke European capitals
    �
    The US has put them up to all this as the ringleader of NATO. Why not talk of targeting US cities? It's like putting out arson fires without going after the arsonist. Perhaps this is to highlight to the Europeans that the US is hiding behind them, that they are the frontline of NATO and that war would be fought on their territories and not on that of the US. For its part the US has been threatening to use nuclear weapons ever since it first used them, Korea,Vietnam, Russia, China being some of the proposed targets along the way. Even now idiot American politicians are talking recklessly about war, no-fly zones, sending troops and other non-starters. The rhetoric is too much. And it's all about something no one even cares about except for the US which has engineered all this.

    Replies: @Bragadocious, @Anymike

    Why not talk of targeting US cities?

    I don’t know, you pathetic blob of shit, maybe the Russians understand who the real instigators are here. They’re in London. Maybe you should remonstrate with Moscow about how it’s so unfair that they’re not including Chicago in their war plans. Stamp your feet and sob for greater effect.

    The Russians have now spoken of nuking Britain twice. That says a lot. You must be beside yourself.

    202 seconds! Lmao

  • The Washington Post jumps on a new study of the genes and behaviors of thousands of dogs as opening another front in The War on Stereotypes: Looking for a well-behaved dog? Breed may not tell you much. Researchers found that breed alone explains very little about dog behavior and personality By Katie Shepherd Yesterday at...
  • @Anonymous

    We are constantly lectured about how gender differences in behavior are socially constructed due to the patriarchy’s need to impose the Gender Binary on everybody. But when it comes to dogs, American society is strikingly lacking in widespread stereotypes about sex differences.
    �
    Well, I've never had a female dog hump my leg. Does that count as a sex difference?

    https://i.imgur.com/NfGxUZl.jpg

    Replies: @Paul Mendez, @Sarah

    Well, I’ve never had a female dog hump my leg

    Growing up, we had a bitch that would hump your leg. And if we were wrestling on the ground, she’d join in the fun by humping whoever was winning.