This book argues that Western secularism itself is product of Christianity. Against the claims of tribe , family etc, the distinctive personality of Western man is a product of a long development in the course of history.https://www.amazon.com/Inventing-Individual-Origins-Western-Liberalism/dp/0674417534
Back in the day, I worked as a waiter at Windows on the World. I was so happy to get that job at the time. It was hitting a milestone for me. The atmosphere was fairly corporate, very professional, the pay was excellent, and I was in a Union, which meant I couldn't be fired unless I pulled some wildly egregious act. For a kid in his twenties, it was a great job.
One of the more demoralising effects of ‘diversity’ drives is to leave whites without a social space to themselves of any significance to feel free to talk about certain topics or develop a collective trust.
As Westerners have social worlds increasingly defined by their workplace, this will become ever more acute. Starbucks-Americans have a veto over the non-diverse.
�
Hope they all did okay.
Brutal. Lol!
China was trying to build a space program from the 70s onward with very little success.
They were only able to get a program off the ground when they bought Russian technology and got Russia to train their taikonauts
Where they can manipulate the proxy hands of the corporate managerial state to do all the dirty work of a pick pocket for them?
Well, we are all created equal…under the law. Which is why so many black Americans end up in the slammer.
I only have a couple of local examples to go by, but those Chik-fil-a stores hire by word of mouth and references. Mostly high school kids, mostly girls, and mostly private, charter, or Catholic school students. I don’t know if that’s corporate procedure or local preference, but it seems to work well.
Jared Taylor, you appeared on a popular talk and were asked your opinion about Jews, at which point you famously said, "They look white to me." So who is really guilty of "closing their eyes" and "pretending" Jared? It is you, Jared, who are perpetually bound and gagged by the same taboo as usual.Replies: @Old and Grumpy, @anon, @Anonymous, @Priss Factor, @Temporary Insanity, @noname27
When it comes to race, we are supposed to close our eyes and pretend that white racism – and only racism – is holding back blacks and Hispanics.
�
“They look white to me.â€
So this is absolutely bonkers. Whites like Jared are part of the problem because they fail/refuse to address the Jewish Question.
“Whites” have to stop identifying themselves and others by skin color. It is their downfall and weakness that the Jew exploits.
Call yourselves Christian-Europeans. In that name, there is no question who is who. And it also avoids the stigma of racism.
The Jew may look white, but he is not Christian-European. He can only be Jewish-European who share Christian-European history/culture in many ways, but remain different and separate.
And as a sidebar, he is separate/different not because he is excluded from joining Christian-Europeans, but rather because he chooses to remain alien, distinct, separate and tribal.
I have some tulip bulbs I’ll sell you……..
Yeah, I’m not going to watch your YouTube “miraclesâ€. I’ve witnessed a miracle or two in my life and they did not involve any blood. In fact if you were not paying attention you would never know they happened. That is the true grace of God: salvation in a pinch. Rotation on a dime. Not some ostentatious display of magic.
"Give me evidence!"
Yeah, I’m not going to watch your YouTube “miraclesâ€.
�
The Egyptians destroyed the temple of the Jews at Elephantine with the Oxford History of Ancient Egypt suggesting that they had come as mercenaries of the barbarians (I do not use the word lightly) who had invaded a much higher civilization.
Anyone who knows anything about Ancient Egypt knows that divine monarchy was central to the development of this “wonderful people” ( as described by an Christian Egyptologist) and there is what to me is a prophetic utterance in a pyramid text warning about not letting whom Josephus would desrcribe as the ancestors of the Jews, the Hyksos into Egypt.
This would be echoed 2000 years later in an Oracle of Isis who said that if the Jews are not put out they would close the temples. This happened in practice when the sibling of the Jews did exactly that.
From your description of Kabbalah its just another demonic take on what was good in Ancient Egypt – Freemasons are another version – albeit I assume good faith on your unwitting part and that of most Freemasons.
A Jew who professes an affinity to ancient Egypt misses entirely the point because it was never based on tribe or race.
A Jew who loves the monarchy and ways of Ancient Egypt is no longer a Jew but an Egyptian. Freemasonry and Kabbalah are not Ancient Egyptian but the same old spirit of isfet that seeks to infiltrate and destroy by mimicry and demonic magic that comes from the dark side.
All race based philosophies have no home in Ancient Egypt and neither does anti-clerical or anti-monarchial movements.
So Hitler’s Nazi ideology was pretty much molded by those pesky Russians?
Brilliant. Another fantastic installment in the ‘Hitler dindu nuffin’ genre.
I can guess we can now wave goodbye to the notion that the entire underpinnings of Nazi racialism were developed in the US, by the likes of Madison Grant [The Passing of the Great Race, 1916], Lothrop Stoddard [Untermensch, 1922], and ‘anthropologist’ Carleton Coon [the ‘Jewish nose’] et al.
Hitler simply transplanted to Germany the racial ‘hygiene’ and eugenics theories that were already fully formed in the US long before.
With the Russians getting the blame. Reminded of the Diehard movie with Samuel Jackson and Bruce Willis. The US version depicts bad guy Germans. In Germany, they're portrayed as Russians.
So Hitler’s Nazi ideology was pretty much molded by those pesky Russians?
Brilliant. Another fantastic installment in the ‘Hitler dindu nuffin’ genre.
I can guess we can now wave goodbye to the notion that the entire underpinnings of Nazi racialism were developed in the US, by the likes of Madison Grant [The Passing of the Great Race, 1916], Lothrop Stoddard [Untermensch, 1922], and ‘anthropologist’ Carleton Coon [the ‘Jewish nose’] et al.
Hitler simply transplanted to Germany the racial ‘hygiene’ and eugenics theories that were already fully formed in the US long before. �
Who were these White Russians that failed to notice the Nazi attitude towards Slavs? Lebensraum as a concept predated the Nazis by at least 20 years. Where did they think all that “living room” was going to come from?
Many and most of them appear to have done just that. Lumping some with all has at times led to some misconceived historical notions of reality.
Who were these White Russians that failed to notice the Nazi attitude towards Slavs? Lebensraum as a concept predated the Nazis by at least 20 years. Where did they think all that “living room†was going to come from?
�
Key observation here. The most important thing a parent can offer throughout a an offspring's childhood is a well-exerted power of triage over the friends and peers their child meets. (This of course puts the 86 on just about every public school out there.) Most parents don't pay nearly enough attention to whom their children hang out with, especially since single motherhood and the two-breadwinner home have come to account for a majority of child-rearing situations in North America.Replies: @Dissident, @Dissident
Not my experience. I have known “feminists†who are very close to their fathers, and conservative women whose fathers were total dirtbags. Like a lot of choices young people make, I suspect peer pressure has significantly more influence than parents.
�
The most important thing a parent can offer throughout a an offspring’s childhood is a well-exerted power of triage over the friends and peers their child meets.
Quite true.
(This of course puts the 86 on just about every public school out there.)
And probably most private ones as well, no? At least for the committed, unreformed traditionalist.
(Might also add that the threat of pernicious influence that is posed by schools is not limited to that from the students but includes the faculty– both on the individual as well as collective levels; both official and unofficial.)
Most parents don’t pay nearly enough attention to whom their children hang out with, especially since single motherhood and the two-breadwinner home have come to account for a majority of child-rearing situations in North America.
For the conditions that led to the situation you describe, is unbridled corporate greed and predation, enabled by neoliberal economic policies, not at least as much to blame as anything else ? Ditto for the terrible scourge– one that can easily be a more malign influence upon an impressionable mind than any in-the-flesh relationship or encounter– that the blessings of technology have made largely inexorable.
To be sure, I didn't want to imply that parents could just go off and laze about once they've secured a group of reliable peers for their little tykes. But a kid who comes from a broken home yet happens into a good peer group from early on may be very salvagable, although as you hinted in the next part on that may be in no small part due to benevolent other parents and teachers who assert a positive influence in loco parentis for a large part of the child's week. Conversely, almost every time I have seen nasty kids from good, upright and loving parents it's because the kids fell in with the wrong crowd and their parents didn't take decisive enough action to pull them out.I'm not just referring to politics, of course, but the fact that so many children of conservative parents become liberals after high school and (especially) college only underscores the point that what happens when the parent isn't around is just as important as what happens when he is.
I expressed unqualified agreement with that statement in my initial reply. Upon reflection, I wish to amend my response somewhat by arguing that as critical as exerting control to the extent possible and reasonable over the individuals one’s child spends time and forms relationships with, there is something even more critical: Leading by example
�
Absolutely. And it's worse than ever, with many formerly solid Catholic or Protestant Christian schools waving the "Woke" banner now. Up until a few years ago I'd have said that the state-run Catholic schools in France were at least "better" than the fully-secularized public schools and they probably still are but after these past few years that much of "better" doesn't seem to count for much anymore.
And probably most private [schools] as well, no? At least for the committed, unreformed traditionalist.(Might also add that the threat of pernicious influence that is posed by schools is not limited to that from the students but includes the faculty– both on the individual as well as collective levels; both official and unofficial.)
�
I certainly think it is. Marketing students will be familiar with a target demographic called "DINK": dual income no kids. This is the most coveted segment for consumer-goods peddlers: the (mostly/formally) monogamous couple optimizing rent in a one-bedroom apartment in a large city with no one else to eat up disposable income and the least impetus to scrimp and save. There's a reason the plutocrats would rather yuppies not marry - and why they have been enthusiastic boosters of LGBT (gay male couple in particular make the picture-perfect DINK in the minds of the lazy).
For the conditions that led to the situation you describe, is unbridled corporate greed and predation, enabled by neoliberal economic policies, not at least as much to blame as anything else ?
�
It is notable that Steve Jobs and so many other Silicon Valley moguls have been known to severely limit the screen time their offspring are allowed. The ones who deliberately make us addicted know exactly how and why this addiction is so dangerous. I don't like to judge because I don't have children yet and I imagine the temptation to hypnotize a whiny kid with an electronic toy must be overwhelming. Nevertheless, parents who allow minor children any unsupervised access to the Internet or television are courting disaster.
Ditto for the terrible scourge– one that can easily be a more malign influence upon an impressionable mind than any in-the-flesh relationship or encounter– that the blessings of technology have made largely inexorable.
�
Illegal porn?
So the “Lincoln’s Getting A Chocolate Hummer” statue is gone? This country is heading for a bad patch under China Joe and
Willie’s Ho.
Or as they referred to in Denco: Geezer and Skeezer until he gets a seizure.
You’re going to take the krugerrand. Give him the tp. Accumulate the krugerrands. When or if things normalize ( a big gamble, I’ll admit) you’ll have a pile of krugerrands instead of a pile of toilet paper. You can thank me by sending ten percent to a Cayman Islands bank account the number of which I’ll send you under separate cover.
That’s pretty much what George Soros did.
Of course if society does completely and utterly collapse, which it won’t, you and me and George will look pretty stupid.
US votes against UN budget, citing antisemitism and failure to pressure Iran
Only Israel voted with US against United Nations’ 2021 programme budget, citing antisemitism and issues with Iran sanctions
https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/us-votes-against-un-budget-citing-israel-antisemitism-iran
Well trained dog cant change bitch’s habit of sniffing at the anus . USA needs to be sent packing .
I am reminded of an exchange between Madame (Rodham-)Clinton and Mitt Romney that occurred, if memory serves, at some point during the 2008 Presidential primary season. Ms. Clinton, then seeking the nomination of her party, had made some comment that I recall as expressing essentially the same view as the one that you alluded-to. In a critical, summarily dismissive, reflexively pro-simplistic "free-market" orthodoxy response, Mr. Romney suggested that Mrs. Clinton ought to read Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations. My reaction at the time was to think that this response of Romney's actually revealed more about his own ignorance of Smith's actual writing than anything about H. Clinton's comment (which I recall finding not unreasonable). I think it was somewhat after that I heard Noam Chomsky, in the course of one of his interviews or lectures, say (paraphrasing from memory),
It does, in fact, take a village, even if the Wicked Witch of the West said it.
�
The village must support, not supplant, that base.
I’m not advocating for the abolishment of families. AFAIK I support all pro-family policies.
I was merely expressing my support for the Social Security System. (The Disability program is a disaster and needs major reform, but we don’t do rational policy reform anymore.) I believe that “we” are better off if “we” force people to save for their old age.
My “village” was community, local and nation-state.
Delusional, Asian women go for White men solely because of their race, in fact Asian parents openly encourage their daughters to go for White men.https://i.ibb.co/rZ8LT20/preferences.pngAsian women exclude Asian men from their dating pool at by far the highest rate, with 40% excluding their own race, and only 6% preferring their own race. They also exclude White men at the lowest rates out of all races of women. This alone strongly suggests they have a strong preference for White males, simply because of their race, and they do not rate Blacks higher, most of them actively avoid Black males from their dating pools.Asian women are extremely undiscriminating when it comes to getting with White guys, as long as you are not truly ugly, they will settle for you. You can go onto the hapa subreddit or subreddits like AznIdentity to get hundreds of anecdotal stories and lived experiences by Asian males of this phenomenon of Asian women chasing White males simply for their Whiteness.Asian women are attractive if you have a fetish for epicanthic folds, but other than that they are not so great. They are however good for White males who cannot get with a decent looking White women and don't want to settle for some bitchy mid-tier White female and instead want an Asian who will worship them.Replies: @Jim Bob Lassiter, @last straw, @Hapalong Cassidy, @Anonymous
So yeah, if you landed an Asian woman you are above-average attractiveness and status as a white male. Average white males and pedos have to settle for white women, Asian women can afford much higher standards.
�
“Asian women are attractive if you have a fetish for epicanthic folds, but other than that they are not so great. ”
Not to mention that they squeak like like a reed whistle in cheap plastic cry-baby doll when they have sex.
Because jews make the fallacious claim that the Protocols were literal in their claim to being the actual minutes of a meeting of jews. They can’t perceive the council as a narrative device to describe very real things going on. The inability (or unwillingness) of jews to make this distinction leads to the Protocols being called a “forgery” and allowing its critics to throw out the entirety of the work
When I said that White women are as opposed to affirmative action as White men, you said:
saying white women are omnipotent would be the height of idiocy, and so that’s why you (also) dishonestly mischaracterize what I said.
�
In other words, White women get what we want.
If that were true, there’d be no affirmative action.
�
A huge majority of men and women (73% and 76%, respectively) support women in combat roles, if they so desire. But therein lies the problem with your argument. Hardly any actually want these jobs, even among those who are already in the military!This is a big fat nothing burger. There have always been exceptional women who engage in gender-atypical activities. With so few volunteering, it's safe to assume that these are indeed exceptional women. Whether fitness standards should be changed to accommodate women is another question.https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/feb/25/us-army-women-combat-jobs-survey
are you suggesting that a majority of white women don’t think women should be in combat?
�
Lol my achin' sides! The dispassionate scholar routine, again.
I simply wondered out loud�
I just think they’re more naturally compassionate than men, and that was my only point.Indeed, and that's precisely why depriving women of the franchise would be a terrible idea. We need safe, humane prisons, provision for the elderly, wage and hour protections, child labor laws, etc.Of course, there is certainly such a thing as too much of a good thing, and you'd definitely have too much compassion with an all-female electorate, but noone is suggesting that men be disenfranchised. The beauty of complementarity is that we balance each other out. As the ideal home includes both a mother and a father, so the ideal electorate includes both men and women.https://mythologian.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Pagan-Symbols-and-Meanings-Yin-Yang.pngReplies: @Rurik, @Tony Massey
�
When I said that White women are as opposed to affirmative action as White men, you said:
If that were true, there’d be no affirmative action.
In other words, White women get what we want.
not quite
they get gender affirmative action, because they made a devil’s bargain with Jewish supremacy, to go along with racial affirmative action- so long as they too can get their unearned benefits from the bargain too.
But that is hardly calling white women “omnipotent’, which is ridiculous. So why would you (dishonestly) suggest that I said something so patently ridiculous, unless it was intended as a smear?
If blacks get what they want vis-a-vis affirmative action, does that make them ‘omnipotent”?
Only a fool would suggest such a thing. And only a dishonest person would put those words in someone’s mouth, in order to discredit them.
There is a certain de rigueur here, where misquoting is considered a most unseemly gaucherie. I’d advise against the practice.
But therein lies the problem with your argument. Hardly any actually want these jobs, even among those who are already in the military!
but my argument is against the rationality of the policy, not the actual number of women serving.
Even if none were serving, my argument would be the same, vs. ‘theirs’; that women and girls should not be put in harms way by a sane society. A nation or tribe fights to protect their women folk. Only the worst cowardly cretins on the planet would send their women to fight and die (or worse) so that they could stay safe and cozy, as their womenfolk and girls absorbed the bullets.
This is a big fat nothing burger.
It goes to the heart of the sanity and moral health of a nation/civilization.
There have always been exceptional women who engage in gender-atypical activities
Indeed. And if they can muster the wherewithal, then I’d have no problem with letting women play in the NFL, or anywhere else they can prove they’re up to the standards. Even as firefighters, or what have you. If they are up to the standards. But I wouldn’t send women to fight men with guns, as a matter of principle.
[women are] more naturally compassionate than men
Indeed, and that’s precisely why depriving women of the franchise would be a terrible idea. We need safe, humane prisons, provision for the elderly, wage and hour protections, child labor laws, etc.
Of course, there is certainly such a thing as too much of a good thing, and you’d definitely have too much compassion with an all-female electorate, but noone is suggesting that men be disenfranchised. The beauty of complementarity is that we balance each other out. As the ideal home includes both a mother and a father, so the ideal electorate includes both men and women.
wow
Thoughtful, tempered, well-considered, and on point.
I’m at a loss over here.
To your point, perhaps so.
I really don’t know the answer, I was just more or less asking out loud what others thought.
And really, it’s all completely academic. Women are not going to lose the vote in the West, unless or until Islam or some such less ‘enlightened’ people become ascendant, which seems inevitable at this point.
And in the spirit of your last paragraphs, I’ll now wish you and Carolyn a very Happy New Year.
True, the National Socialists were riddled with jews and mischlings at all levels, an uncomfortable truth for some.. Somewhat like their close dealings with financial zionists are memory holed.
Also, see jews in the Wehrmacht and enlisted men. There were many traitors….
Unsurprisingly.
Jesus spoke ill of people on several occasions, as all righteous men must. John 8:44.
Yes, as proven by the flood of defensive butthurt Chinese responses to your honest and sober observations earlier in the thread. The modern Chinese mentality is deeply flawed in its propensity for extreme hubris and arrogance, which makes the Chinese unable to endure honest and constructive criticism. Pride comes before a fall, they say.
The modern Chinese mentality is deeply flawed in its propensity for extreme hubris and arrogance, which makes the Chinese unable to endure honest and constructive criticism. Pride comes before a fall, they say.Tell that to the "usanumberone" crowd. It's the Yanks who don't want to accept the fact that their time is up. The USA Empire is in irreversible decline and falling fast. And you have Yanks like TJH14 making "beggar-thy-neighbor" comments that don't even address the problems of the USA but criticize foreign countries to make himself feel better about the USA.
�
The real question here is “forgery of what”. I have read that both Jacob Schiff (Russian Revolution) and Henry Morgentau (Morgentau Plan) carried their own special “versions” of the Protocols. Clearly there are various translations from various sources, but from which language and which source was “the forgery” originally written?
The Islamic Golden Age is a myth. Christian Byzantium had already outpaced the Muslim world.
And maybe Asians in America are self-selected survivors (ie, Vietnamese refugees), whereas Asians in Asia represent the total possible spectrum.
When it comes to race, we are supposed to close our eyes and pretend that white racism – and only racism – is holding back blacks and Hispanics.
The presence of white people is supposedly a clear and present danger to blacks and Hispanics yet Barack Hussein Obama even said that blacks and browns must be placed into a white zip code in order to have a chance at success. That is why he made the completely unconstitutional affirmatively furthering fair housing rule that SCOTUS managed to find “constitutional” since they adhere to the new post 1965 Constitution of black racial supremacy. AFFA forces working and middle class white communities that accept HUD block grants to build section 8 housing wherever HUD directs.
If white people are truly so terrible and a dire threat to black and brown well being then there should be immediate racial segregation and blacks and browns shouldn’t be allowed anywhere near “whypipo”.
Actually, I prefer the Henry Ford response to the allegation: It does not matter if they are fake, it fits what is happening today.
Well I’ll be…
I bet ‘Ol Henry and I would be good friends; for one thing I have long responded that way and never knew he said it, so thanks! And another thing that I find interesting is that it’s happening here, today as well. Some things never change.
It’s for the best. This isn’t getting better anytime soon, and balkanization won’t be clean unless there’s good pockets of White majority areas in the states.
A key problem is that good whites take their cancerous politics with them. They’ll bitch and whine about taxes and crime and traffic and crappy schools and homelessness and filth and high housing prices …
then move next to you and vote for Democrats … to subject you to the same “stuff”.
~~
We need an actual separation where sane middle class Americans can live sanely and protect their communities from interlopers.
Iran’s thermonuclear program going.
When did the incessant media stream of “Iran will have a Hiroshima-type bomb NEXT MONTH (presumably on a delivery vehicle)” into “Iran will have a fusion bomb”? That smoking laptop must be smoking more and more.
One will also notice how smoothly the focus on “Saddam’s Bomb” was moved to “Mullah’s Bomb” once Saddam was no longer a factor.
Ceterum censeo, all “journalists” who have been in on that nonexistent nuke program should be summarily “dealt with”. That includes everyone in the editorial offices. Man, woman, trans, gay, or bi/tri or extrasexual, above or below the glass ceiling. I don’t care. Clean up.
Replies: @J.Ross
The Times quoted a 31-year-old nurse, April Lu, who made just such a calculation. She said that because she's six months pregnant, she chose the known risks of being infected with Covid-19 over the unknown risks of being vaccinated.
Vaccine advocates reacted angrily, with some saying hospital workers who refuse the shots should be fired, or at least put at the back of the line for treatment if they become infected with the virus. “I can't believe this is happening,†one observer said. “This has to be a joke. How are people in the healthcare industry but ignore science?â€
�
There have been totally mainstream people saying that pregnant women should skip it. That’s not even that hard to believe, of course pregnant woman have unique issues. What’s funny is that you have all these young people who are not at risk jumping queue so more nursing home deaths can remind us how medicine works.
Back in the day, I worked as a waiter at Windows on the World. I was so happy to get that job at the time. It was hitting a milestone for me. The atmosphere was fairly corporate, very professional, the pay was excellent, and I was in a Union, which meant I couldn't be fired unless I pulled some wildly egregious act. For a kid in his twenties, it was a great job.
One of the more demoralising effects of ‘diversity’ drives is to leave whites without a social space to themselves of any significance to feel free to talk about certain topics or develop a collective trust.
As Westerners have social worlds increasingly defined by their workplace, this will become ever more acute. Starbucks-Americans have a veto over the non-diverse.
�
Eventually, I left Windows on the World for better things, leaving my hateful Filipino co-workers behind. I harbored no resentment.
Hope they all did okay.
Wasn’t Windows on the World in one of the towers that went down on 9/11?
Of course that was early in the day so probably before they were at work, if they still worked there.
“I don’t think it is exactly out of the question that an incumbent so visibly incompetent can lose fairly”
Exactly.
“Either Congress has a role in looking at certification of state elections and the Democrats are being hypocrites, or they don’t and Democratic actions after the 2004 and 2016 elections were “coups in the making†too.”
Let’s take a closer look here, as those two situations–as well as what happened in 2001–were NOT coups, but specific, tailored objections. Sour grapes, certainly.
In 2001, a dozen members of the Congressional Black Caucus, joined by a few sympathizers, sought to block the counting of Florida’s 25 electoral votes, contesting that there were repeated efforts by officials there to disenfranchise black voters. In response, Vice President Al Gore repeatedly gaveled down those members, ruling their objections and parliamentary procedures out of order, and made official the election of his opponent, GW Bush.
In 2005, a representative from Ohio and a senator from California objected to certifying Ohio’s electoral votes. Their complaints mirrored those from the Congressional Black Caucus four years earlier, and they were soundly rejected by a majority of both chambers. Republicans dismissed the effort as a political stunt, noting that investigations by news agencies and state officials into the allegations proved to be untrue. “But apparently, some Democrats only want to gripe about counts, recounts, and recounts of recounts,” said Rep. Deborah Pryce, an Ohio Republican. “So eager are they to abandon their job as public servants, they have cast themselves in the role of Michael Moore, concocting wild conspiracy theories to distract the American public.”
In 2016, a representative from Texas and a representative from California, arguing “voter suppression”. Their effort was short-lived, as no Senator took up their cause. In response, Vice President Joe Biden repeatedly gaveled down those members, ruling their objections and parliamentary procedures out of order, and made official the election of Donald Trump.
Those three situations are no where near what is occurring today, given how Republican officials and Trump appointed judges have indicated there was not the widespread voter/election fraud as claimed. NOTICE that Trump lawyers in their court cases around the nation were not making those charges in their court filings/hearings.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-cries-election-fraud-in-court-his-lawyers-dont-11605271267
For example, Trump lawyers sought to have the Bucks County (PA) Court of Common Pleas invalidate more than 2,200 supposedly “defective ballots†that were counted after a review by the Board of Elections. YET, they agreed to sign documents saying that there was zero evidence of fraud or misconduct when it came to said ballots. Attorneys for both sides signed a “joint stipulation of facts—an instrument meant to provide the court with facts relevant to the case that are undisputed by either party in the action—which clearly disavows any claims that voting in the commonwealth’s fourth-largest county was affected by any fraudulent conduct.†The joint statement literally reads: “Petitioners do not allege, and there is no evidence of, any fraud in connection with the challenged ballots.†Additionally, both sides agreed that election observers from each party were allowed full access to view the pre-canvassing and canvassing processes.
So, how will VP Pence respond on January 6 to Senator Hawley and others who seek to join his cause? Remember, Pence’s role is to merely oversee the joint session of the House and Senate that will officially count the Electoral College votes for president and vice president. He cannot simply “discount” or “dismiss” the results and declare Trump victorious.
http://www.floridalawreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Siegel-BOOK.pdf
They will not remember, for they dispute that it is so.The Constitution has always been ambiguous on this point. When red-faced citizens leap to their feet to insist with raised fists that the Constitution “very clearly states” something or other, they backhandedly attest to the very ambiguity they wish to deny.Our problem is that the statute to which you refer is rooted in no authority clearly granted by the Constitution's Article�1, Section�8, nor granted by any other article or section. The statute nevertheless exists because no one has clear authority in the matter, so there the statue sits, trying to suspend itself in midair by its own belt, so to speak. It would be interesting in theory to hear what Blackstone had to say about a case like this, but I fear that tempers are too raw to consult that sage of yore now.I take no position as to whether Mike Pence or anyone else should force the issue Jan.�6. However, if both sides do force it, then we shall have the very definition of a constitutional crisis on our hands.By nature, constitutional crises cannot be resolved by principally legal means, but by violent or, preferably, political means.
Remember, Pence’s role is to merely oversee the joint session of the House and Senate that will officially count the Electoral College votes for president and vice president.
�
Time waster? Look at yourself in the mirror asshole. Your whole idiotic post was an exercise in wasting time, yours und others, and at OBFUSCATION.
Your obfuscation about Niall Ferguson is probably the silliest of it all.
Anyone who knows anything about the situation of WW I “scholarship” in the West, even more so in the Anglo sphere, understands very well that Ferguson tears up the establishmentarian version of the war to bits in that book, and this even though he pulls his punches a bit, perhaps out of necessity.
That is exactly the reason why you and that other dork, ‘verymuchalive’, have disliked the book… if you even actually read it. Being an Oxford linked historian, and Oxford being evidently a place where A LOT of anti-German pseudo history has been cooked up for the last 100 years, makes it harder to just dismiss Ferguson out of hand though. That happens every once in a very long while. Another one was A. J. P Taylor, though through touching an even more taboo/sacred official narrative, that of WW2, it caused him a lot of trouble.
American Jewish scholar P. Gottfried, describes the situation well in one of his articles:
‘Having devoted considerable time over the last forty years to studying the Great War, … I am no longer surprised or disappointed by fictional accounts of this conflict… This is seen particularly in the attempt to attach overwhelming responsibility to the losing side while making the Allied governments look better than they were. …
I examine this skewed approach not as an exception to current historical studies but as characteristic of the way they are now done: although at no other time has there been so much available historical information, perhaps never before has historiography been so drenched in ideology. Historians and journalists now have at their command more data than was available to great historians of the past. But this opportunity for accurate depictions is squandered when readers are bombed with ideologically shaped stereotypes.
One can cite as examples such journalists as Victor Davis Hanson, Max Boot, and David Frum, all of whom never rise above clichés in their condemnation of the losing side in World War One. …
More relevant to my discussion, however, are those who know something about the War but who can’t resist serving us warmed-over platitudes. Someone who fits this category is the distinguished British historian Sir Max Hastings. …
I am citing Hastings’s work not because it contains an unusual number of errors but because it typifies a widely accepted interpretation of the War. Unlike such publicists as Hanson and Max Boot, Hastings understands his subject. …
Too often his anti-German, anti-Austrian bias gets in the way of impartial judgment.
LAME:
Am I to assume that you are on record as stating that the imminent Naval rivalry between Britain and Germany in the ironclad era had NO influence on Britain siding against Germany in The Great War?
My point was made very clearly, do you have trouble understanding your own mother tongue?
Once again, for the last time; the naval “rivalry” was indeed the PRETEXT for the British Empire siding against Germany in the years before the outbreak of the Great War. The British never really felt threatened by German naval power, and rightly so. The German navy was much smaller and Germany lacked the global naval bases that the Brits had in order to project power.
Already in the year 1900, this was the conclusion reached by the British in their analysis of the naval balance of strenght between the 2 countries. British »Naval Annual« of 1900. (Schattenstrategen, Kriegstreiber, stille Profiteure 1914 und heute,WOLFGANG EFFENBERGER und WILLY WIMMER).
The same can be said of other pretexts masquarading as real reasons, such as the dork ‘verymuchalives’ rehashing the notion that Russia entered the war because of Serbia.
As Sean McMeekin explains in ‘The Russian Origins of the First World War’:
Likewise, Russia’s real interests in July 1914 could not possibly have been as ethereal as her public posturing about “Slavic honor and the Serbs.†An extensive survey of Russia’s diplomatic correspondence in the months before the Sarajevo incident does not reveal undue concern with any sort of Serbian problem, nor, indeed, is concern voiced in the months after July. (Revealingly, one of Sazonov’s first diplomatic moves following the outbreak of the world war was to pressure Serbia to cede Macedonian territory to Bulgaria.)48 What it does reveal is a widespread obsession, bordering on panic, with the Straits question. Following the Italian and the two Balkan wars, it was now universally assumed that Turkey would not last for long in the face of the belligerent hostility of its neighbors. The question was, which power would swallow which pieces of the carcass as the Ottoman Sick Man was carved up? And for Petersburg, the question was starker still:
who would now control Constantinople and the Straits?
With excellent health. That allowed them to brag about their generous health plan, with full coverage for part-timers. Sure, it can work, if you cherry-pick the beneficiaries. Interestingly, at the Mpls-St Paul airport, almost all the Starbucks baristas were East Africans, though still young, healthy, and handsome. It was hometown Caribou that made sure to balance their staff with stereotypical Nordic kids. (Though the two tall blondes I made sure to buy from when there had a French and a Czech surname. They looked Nordic.)Somehow, Caribou lost the baggage claim spot at Lindbergh to Starbucks, which is no way to greet visitors to your own city.
I think Starbucks got big in the 90s by quietly mostly restricting barista hiring to far-above-average-looking females.
�
That was a happy accident. They were just selling by the bag in Seattle when new CEO Schultz got bored a some cafe convention in Milan and skipped out to explore the local alleys. He copied the Milanese practice at the flagship store, and it exploded from there. Others were already doing this in Seattle, but Starbucks had a different clientele-- the bag buyers. They wanted a quick shot at lunch break.Replies: @Lot, @Yojimbo/Zatoichi
Starbucks got big in the 90s
�
Starbucks also followed McDonald’s route to success–put as many stores in as many parts of the US as possible. Flood the nation with the stores, and squeeze out mom and pops cafes in the process. Regarding coffee stores, to place them en masse everywhere possible, no one else in the US had that vision or goal.
Starbucks, the McDonald’s of coffee. Quantity over quality. No matter where you buy a cup of standard coffee in Starbucks, no matter its location in the US, it uniformly tastes the exact same. Just like McDonalds; uniformity brought Starbucks untold profits in the same manner.
Is that also true of Edward Jones, the Subway of brokers?
Just like McDonalds; uniformity brought Starbucks untold profits in the same manner.
�
Burnt and expensive.Replies: @Jim Don Bob
No matter where you buy a cup of standard coffee in Starbucks, no matter its location in the US, it uniformly tastes the exact same...
�
People, especially credulous woke millenials, really have no idea how wierd obedience is. It’s like how they want us all in self-driving cars linked to eachother to program perfect traffic (cf The Italian Job) but nobody who has ever driven to work can disagree that very few people drive the speed limit except when they can see a cop. The first day of automation, everyone will be late, and will comment on how strangely long it takes compared to yesterday.
Little’s story is based on falsehoods, used for creating more panic and fear.
Read this incredible account of Little’s skating through the Justice system.
From his wiki entry:
“In 1982, Little was arrested in Pascagoula, Mississippi, and charged with the murder of 22-year-old Melinda Rose LáPree, who had gone missing in September of that year. A grand jury declined to indict him for her murder. However, while under investigation, Little was transferred to Florida to be brought to trial for the murder of 26-year-old Patricia Ann Mount, whose body was found in September 1982. Prosecution witnesses identified Little in court as a person who spent time with Mount on the night before her disappearance. Due to mistrust of witness testimonies, Little was acquitted in January 1984.[13]”
Convenient. What happened to the inherent racism in the American Justice system?
China has never won a Fields Medal. Statistically, they should be winning all of them with its population size and supposes IQ advantage .
This holds true going back in history as well. Chinese have contibuted nothing in mathematics. All advances have been made in India and Europe.
The world would be bereft if it had to depend on Chinesse mathematicians
It’s odd, because you don’t see Chinese, Turks or even the Arab world so obsessively engaging in such aggressive online behaviour
Did you miss out on the KARA BOÄžA meme?
Arabs merely wish for death upon Europe, while crying about Islamophobia and burning French goods (after they have paid money for them) in protest.
The Chinese are nicely sequestered behind their Great Wall.
The bronze statue features an inscription that reads, “a race set free and the country at peace.â€
If I give the author the benefit of the doubt, it might have been accurate for 15 or 20 minutes.
” A race repatriated to their homeland and the country at peace.”. Now that would have been an epitaph to a hero.
Theranos. Duh.
By the way, what examples are there of firms that prospered by hiring discriminated against blacks and women?
�
I think in context, you mean that there’s no direct punishment if a POC lies about their race: look at the direct consequences for Rachel Dolezal. She made a career about lying about her race, pretending to be a POC. When she was found out, she fell from grace and favor and had to give up her position as a race hustler (among other things). It made national news.
Currently about the only thing a white could do in regards to lying about one’s race would be to emphasize their orientation, as in, non-straight. That might be permitted, but whoa to that person if indeed they get caught lying about such a sacrosanct community as the LGBTetc, e.g. claiming to be a part of it when in fact they are not.
Probably could get fired over it, no telling how far the vengeance mob could go.
The Russian Revolution, according to Slezkine, essentially served to replace the German elite by a Jewish one.Replies: @Skeptikal, @Jett Rucker
From the late eighteenth to the twentieth century, Germans constituted from 18 to more than 33 percent of the top tsarist officials, especially at the royal court, in the officer corps, diplomatic service, police, and provincial administration (including many newly colonized areas). According to John A. Armstrong, all through the nineteenth century the Russian Germans “carried about half the burden of imperial foreign relations. Equally indicative is the fact that even in 1915 (during the World War I anti-Germanism), 16 of the 53 top officials in the Minindel [Ministry of Foreign Affairs] had German names†... In the 1880s, the Russian Germans (1.4 percent of the population) made up 62 percent of the high officials in the Ministry of Posts and Commerce and 46 percent in the War Ministry.
... Germans were, occupationally and conceptually, the Jews of ethnic Russia (as well as much of Eastern Europe). Or rather, the Russian Germans were to Russia what the German Jews were to Germany—only much more so.
�
Catherine the Great was a German princess. It was Catherine who picked up the baton of Peter the Great and transformed Russia into a great European power
From Wiki:
” she strongly encouraged the migration of the Volga Germans, farmers from Germany who settled mostly in the Volga River Valley region. They indeed helped modernise the sector that totally dominated the Russian economy. They introduced numerous innovations regarding wheat production and flour milling, tobacco culture, sheep raising, and small-scale manufacturing.”[55]
55. “The Economic Contributions of the German Russians to the Imperial Russian Economy.” Journal of the American Historical Society of Germans from Russia (2012) 35#2 pp. 1–34.
After getting to know "Chinaman" more in the other thread by reading carefully some of his comments, I can safely tell you that you misunderstand what he says. Readers need more intellectual efforts and focus to read his posts before jumping to conclusion.Anyway, you too always have great comments that I enjoy reading.I don't have much to add, no great predictions like Godfree, but just some new year wishes:1. The orange man has the DECENCY to leave White House without any more drama.
"Dude, you(Chinaman), as a Hongky with a deep set distrust and revulsion to the CPC, I completely understand you are unhappy when “Godfree Roberts†pumps out “how great China is†info."
�
Dan
Happy new year, bro. I hope this will be great year for China!
My English is not as good as yours so I often have trouble expressing myself properly. My sarcasm is often taken literally and misunderstood. I also know my aggression also put the team in a difficult position sometime but I can’t help it when dealing with these dumbasses.
Anyway, I would like your take on Godfree and his motives. I don’t think it is in China’s best interest to let Americans think China is doing TOO well.
Not doubting you but I hope you are not doing the same thing.
You are being modest.
"My English is not as good as yours"
�
The aggression comes even more from the other side.
"I also know my aggression..."
�
We are all learning.
"... put the team in a difficult position sometime"
�
The following is my very superficial opinions. Feel free to criticize.I think highlighting China's technical achievements has the same effects as talking about China's economic achievements, Chinese IQ level, or other positive things:1. For the racists and White supremacists, it would put them into defensive. They would have to come up with more excuses to deny those facts/figures - (e.g IP theft, fake data, less creativity, ...) The more ridiculous their arguments, the better it is.
"Anyway, I would like your take on Godfree and his motives. I don’t think it is in China’s best interest to let Americans think China is doing TOO well.Not doubting you but I hope you are not doing the same thing."
�
Joseph Doaks…no, that’s just the latest iteration. Might I suggest this read (by long forgotten worthy, Garet Garrett):
https://mises.org/library/revolution-was
Here’s the first two paragraphs of the introduction:
There are those who still think they are holding the pass against a revolution that may be coming up the road. But they are gazing in the wrong direction. The revolution is behind them. It went by in the Night of Depression, singing songs to freedom.
There are those who have never ceased to say very earnestly, “Something is going to happen to the American form of government if we don’t watch out.” These were the innocent disarmers. Their trust was in words. They had forgotten their Aristotle. More than 2,000 years ago he wrote of what can happen within the form, when “one thing takes the place of another, so that the ancient laws will remain, while the power will be in the hands of those who have brought about revolution in the state.”
Jews don’t want to be considered white now. Ancient DNA says they are. They at one point said they were. Now after a successful campaign of black vs white, Jews are shapeshifting to color. Why would you oblige them of their backdoor to all the white hating they have created? Call them the true ancient Aryan supremacists, and use their figurative bull feces against them. Most of the world dislikes them, it wouldn’t be that hard to flip their script.
First suggestion of a way forward I have seen in a long time. In any situation there is always one problem which is more important than all the other problems. If one does not tackle that problem many of the other problems are insoluble. If one does solve that problem many other problems will clear up of themselves. In the case of the West this (problem) is obviously the dominant parasitic minority that are mostly (though not entirely) Jews.
I look forward to seeing suggestions as to how to “flip their script”!
The problem of our rulers stirring up race hatred as a way of avoiding class hatred, is clearly a less important problem than the rulers themselves.
The question of “what sort of USA does China want” is really an unimportant question, for the simple reason that the Chinese are far away and have much less influence on what happens in the US than have its inhabitants. In addition, the Chinese are not minded to be the World’s Policeman.
How much longer until Jesus meets a similar fate? Blacks fill the pews on Sunday morning seemingly oblivious to the roll the White man's religion played in saving their black savage souls. I've always been puzzled by the psychology behind adopting the religion of your captors. Why would you kneel before the God of the people who placed you in chains?Replies: @Wyatt, @Rooster10, @Sin City Milla
...because people are offended that a black man would kneel before a white man.
�
Already happened.
https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2020/07/21/jesus-statue-beheaded-catholic-churches-vandalism
Pentagon says Biden is full of shit
Shortly after Biden took a swipe at the Department of Defense, among other agencies that he accused of obstructing the transition, Acting Defense Secretary Christopher Miller shot back, saying that the Pentagon has gone to greater lengths than “recent administrations†in facilitating the process.
Meanwhile, cash-in (aka “sale”) event:
The US State Department has approved the possible sale of 3,000 precision-guided munitions to Saudi Arabia, alongside more than $4 billion in arms transfers to other regional states, arguing the deals support “national security.â€
I’m sure it does.
The munition sale to Saudi Arabia was authorized by the State Department on Tuesday, according to a Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) notice, giving the go-ahead for a transfer of 3,000 GBU-39 Small Diameter Bombs to the Gulf monarchy, worth some $290 million.
What does Saudi-Arabia do with 3000 GBU-39 250lbs bombs?
Lollercaust the entirety of Yemen?
BULLShit. Science and the JudieChristie Magickmagickmindfuck are essentially polar opposites. It was not until refugees from Constantinople made their way to Italy and that after the universality to be found within Andalusian Spain that the knowledge of matters scientific, mathematical and philosophical (upon which the Renaissance was erected) managed to return to Western Europe.
Within the broad scope of European tradition the roots of intellectual development were almost uniformly to be found within the syncretic experience of the ancient Hellenes. Once Constantine castrated the loving ways of the Jesusites and the Gnostics; the Roman Imperial State religion of Churchianity destroyed the wisdom schools and burned the books. The only book which was allowed was Constantine’s Bible and various exudations from that tormentive document. But even that book was kept away from the commonality of the people, because it may have “given people ideas” in opposition to church doctrine.
It was during those DARK AGES when unquestioned churchianity was the norm and where mass illiteracy was the product. People were not ALLOWED to think for themselves. Critical reason was taboo. Millenias of human knowledge and wisdom was lost to the West.
Though the Vikings and later the Lithuanians valiantly fought off the Imperialist onslaught of kingship and churchianity, the connivers and the Teutonic Knights ultimately brought down the last of the resistance to the monomania of the GREAT HISTORICAL DOUBLECROSS engendered upon a population subject to the twin evils of the Roman church and the Holy Roman Empire State of that butcher, Charlemagne.
Platonic academies teaching sorcery? Man, your understanding of history is the typical pretzel-logic of the dogmatically terminally confused. But then, demonization of perceived opposition to your dogmatic postulations is generic to the JudieChristie Magickmindfucked.
Bede. Robert Grosseteste. Albert Magnus. Isidore of Seville. Albert of Saxony. Jean Buridan. Parish schools. Cathedral Schools. Universities. The dark ages were a convienent myth cooked up by atheist writers and their Jewish publishers.
It was not until refugees from Constantinople made their way to Italy and that after the universality to be found within Andalusian Spain that the knowledge of matters scientific, mathematical and philosophical (upon which the Renaissance was erected) managed to return to Western Europe.
�
The last to (and nearly only) Oscar hosts who were funny were British commedian Ricky Gervais and Family Guy (and others) cartoon creator Seth McFarland.
And I remember they made the mistake of having Letterman host the oscars once.
�
Ricky Gervais hosted the Golden Globes several times. His opening monologues from them are among the funniest routines ever. They’re all on Youtube.
I don’t recall his ever having hosted the Oscars.
I didn’t say they had high IQs. I don’t know about that one way or the other. Before telling me I am “totally wrong”, could you please try reading my actual comment, rather than reading into it what you think (a different thing). It would save us both time.
“On December 21, the United States Congress passed the COVID-19 Relief Package, as part of a larger $2.3 trillion bill meant to cover spending for the rest of the fiscal year. As usual, US representatives allocated a massive sum of money for Israel.” and “The last four years, however, required little lobbying by these groups, as powerful agents within the administration itself became Israel’s top advocates.” https://original.antiwar.com/ramzy-baroud/2020/12/30/the-us-money-tree-the-untold-story-of-american-aid-to-israel/
Is Israel paying from its tax dollars or from the US tax dollars?
Israel is also covering his back by lying that Arabs dont’ want to be vaccinated .
Kellogg demonstrates how the Nazis may have had excellent reasons for their anti-Semitism
Everyone has those.
The Anglosphere has placed classical liberalism on the political Right since 1870 or so, because of private property, as you observe. However, is there not an older, European, altar-and-throne tradition which, if anything, would place classical liberalism on the political Left?
Yes. The Left-Right thing doesn’t work does it? The conservative-liberal thing doesn’t work either since virtually all modern conservatives are in fact liberals – what they want to conserve is liberalism. A single political axis doesn’t work. Even if you use two axes you still have problems.
You need multiple political axes. There’s the collectivist-statist axis which works OK if you’re dealing with economic issues. You have free-marketeers at one end and communists at the other.
There’s the authoritarian-libertarian axis which works OK if you’re talking about social issues.
But as you point out, there’s also traditionalism versus progressivism. There’s social conservatism versus social liberalism which often aligns with authoritarianism versus libertarianism. But not always. Today we have, perversely, social liberals who are authoritarians. And we even have social conservatives who see themselves as libertarians (or maybe we have libertarians who see themselves as social conservatives).
Russell Kirk identifies Right and Left respectively with the “party of permanence†and the “party of progress.†Kirk’s identification seems sound to me, but if so, then which wing subsumes classical liberalism?
But then we’ve had political leaders who identify themselves as being on the Right but who are actually revolutionaries who aim to overturn the established order (Margaret Thatcher comes to mind).
Your tour de force merits a reply for courtesy's sake, but really, leaves nothing to which I can add or subtract.
Yes. The Left-Right thing doesn’t work does it? The conservative-liberal thing doesn’t work either since ...
�
Noisy demands for “reparations†also neglect the debt owed to some three hundred thousand loyal white men who lost their lives in the terrible war.
Three hundred thousand lives; an investment of 22 trillion dollars in a failed 55 year experiment to ‘prove’ equality; the lives of countless good White people suddenly ended and relatives forever traumatized; laws bent to accommodate the savage standard along with forced association in schools, the work place and the streets; once safe prosperous cities now reduced to decay, filth and crime.
And somehow all of it revolves around the failings of those who have provided advantages to another race unheard of in any other country or any other period of time.
I’ll repeat this until my last day on this earth:
WE OWE NOTHING
See my original thread here:
https://www.mansonblog.com/2016/09/charlie-black-muslims-and-zebra.html
What am I butt hurt about & it’s funny how you make Dharmic V Abrahamic into Indian V European.
Can genetic white trash only see things in racial terms?
Anyway, you’re Armenian you genocided your Hindus in the name of Christ god now he rebukes you।।
The biggest enemy of white people is white people themselves.
Yes.
OK, so Occam’s Razor might suggest, therefore, that African-Americans aren’t suffering much from pervasive racism, indeed, that they aren’t suffering all that much in general.
�
Or maybe African-Americans just value their lives more?
Could be. However, they sure don’t seem to value other people’s lives very much.
christmas tree origin
https://www.zmescience.com/science/history-science/origin-christmas-tree-pagan/
>how low journalism has fallen
Everything you need to know is that Brian Williams is still working as a talking head after openly admitting to years of outrageous lying.
One part of me is ambivalent for what I’m about to write but what the hell…
If Target wants to create environments that are welcoming to blacks they’ll have to build their stores without cash registers.
Mr. Taylor, you’ve pointed out the many endeavors and attitudes of the mainland Chinese, including their attention paid to the influence of I.Q.
Assumedly, if a people have pursuits in furtherance of technologically raising their intelligence and the scientific prowess to do so, they must have some intelligence to begin with.
The Chinese also recognize who rules the USA, and they have been jealous. They want a piece of that subversive takeover pie too.
But, it was not they who had intentionally created the toxic poison of cultural marxism to destroy the West. You’d certainly have much less grievance about racial issues had this poison never been injected.
The Chinese understand the hand who plucks Uncle Sams’ strings, Mr. Taylor, as per the 2009 Tablet Magazine article “The Chinese believe that Jews control America. Is that a good thing?”
The Chinese know that jews are not Whites, something which jews themselves heartily admit.
If the imminently pragmatic Chinese can see all this, then;
Why. Can’t. You. ?
Cartwheels and handsprings by many a Western Nationalist are surely to be if this day finally arrives.
I am PROUD to state that I have been banned from American Renaissance for over a decade.
Attempts to get “reinstated” have been futile. Moderators have promised to “reinstate” me but have not done so.
I still frequent American Renaissance and have noticed that the statements on the “jewish question” that got me banned are starting to appear on Jared Taylor’s site.
I believe that American Renaissance is “controlled opposition”, nothing more.
I was always struck by the passage in Robert Graves’ book ‘Goodbye To All That’ when a snotty British Colonel walked into the barracks of his previously shot up battalion to announce that he had great news in that they were granted the opportunity to “avenge their comrades” presumably with another charge in no man’s land against barb wire and machine guns. They went.
Interestingly perhaps is that in the next war the “Blighty” was considered a lottery win and a wound that evoked envy. In present wars at least in the forces of the “Coalitions Of The Willing” hearing shots in the distance or an Iraqi child fart brings about disablement due to PTSB.
Are soldiers degenerating or are they getting smart? My guess is both.
Cheers-
I didn’t know what it meant, so thanks for that and I found out that Boutrous Boutrous meant Peter Peter, so, now I can say, rest in peace, Peter, Peter Expensive. And I knew about the Khans because every other man in Bangladesh and Pakistan is named Kahn it seems.
Not with a stolen dick.
Or even its own long-discarded one.
Not with a stolen dick.
�
vikky.
noticed from archive you were parachuted in just for this article.so aggressive.pincer movement almost bowel like.an attack on all fronts.zipper undone,in attempt to hose down the fires of an insurrection,you accidentally got foreskin caught and now the insanity of the trinity has joined with the bonfires of vanity and the pain is excruciating.
bless you my son.circumcision by zipper is crippling but welcome to the jewish tribe anyway.
There is no data to support your assumptions at all. White men with Asian women are the most attractive:
1. University educated males who have studied a STEM discipline2. Elon Musk’s ‘Pedo guyâ€Overall, such an arrangement is beneficial to both parties, the White guys get some and the Asian females have the prospects of “upgrading their genesâ€
�
Swedish exexutives ditch their wives for Asian women in Singapore:http://kjonnsforskning.no/en/2015/09/blond-sexy-and-immigrant
In experiment 1, Caucasian participants rated own-race composites as more attractive than other-race composites, but only for male faces. However, mixed-race (Caucasian/Japanese) composites were significantly more attractive than own-race composites, particularly for the opposite sex.
�
Why Asian women are more beautiful:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13506285.2018.1475437
Not as posh as Chinese whiteness
In the US Swedish women were the whitest of the white, and they were sometimes over-sexualised. But Swedish whiteness did not fit into society in Singapore at all. According to Lundström there is much focus on whiteness in Singapore. Ads for skin whitening products are common, and whiteness is the ideal. But the ideal of beauty is not a white, blond western woman.“Western women were ranked below the Chinese in the racial hierarchy. The western whiteness is not as posh as the Singaporean, Chinese whiteness,†says Lundström.Swedish women in the US were very preoccupied with American men, whereas the Swedish women in Singapore were not the least interested in Asian men. They focused on their Swedish husbands. Asian women, on the other hand, represented a possible rival, since Swedish men found Asian women attractive.“The Swedish women in Singapore were almost desexualised. They felt less feminine,†says Lundström.But on the other hand they didn’t have to relate to local beauty standards. Most of the 13 women who lived in Singapore were accompanying spouses to working husbands. Their husbands’ job contracts included a house with a maid, swimming pool and tennis courts.
�
All races of men go for Asian or Latina women:
Marriages between White men and Asian women are over twice as frequent as those between White women and Asian men. Recent research has proposed that this imbalance may be explained by the finding that, on average, White men are perceived as more attractive than Asian men, and Asian women are perceived as more attractive than White women, possibly because Asian faces are perceived as more feminine than White faces. Here, we explore whether Asian faces are perceived as more feminine than White faces. Thirty-five Malaysian Chinese (20 male) and 30 Australian White (12 male) participants manipulated 100 face photographs (50 Asian; 50 White; half male) on a masculinity/femininity axis to optimize attractive appearance. As predicted, White women’s faces were increased more in femininity than Asian women’s faces, and White men’s faces were feminized more than Asian men’s faces to optimize attractiveness. These findings suggest that White faces are perceived as more masculine than Asian faces.
�
So yeah, if you landed an Asian woman you are above-average attractiveness and status as a white male. Average white males and pedos have to settle for white women, Asian women can afford much higher standards.
Delusional, Asian women go for White men solely because of their race, in fact Asian parents openly encourage their daughters to go for White men.
Asian women exclude Asian men from their dating pool at by far the highest rate, with 40% excluding their own race, and only 6% preferring their own race. They also exclude White men at the lowest rates out of all races of women. This alone strongly suggests they have a strong preference for White males, simply because of their race, and they do not rate Blacks higher, most of them actively avoid Black males from their dating pools.
Asian women are extremely undiscriminating when it comes to getting with White guys, as long as you are not truly ugly, they will settle for you. You can go onto the hapa subreddit or subreddits like AznIdentity to get hundreds of anecdotal stories and lived experiences by Asian males of this phenomenon of Asian women chasing White males simply for their Whiteness.
Asian women are attractive if you have a fetish for epicanthic folds, but other than that they are not so great. They are however good for White males who cannot get with a decent looking White women and don’t want to settle for some bitchy mid-tier White female and instead want an Asian who will worship them.
BS, before contracting yellow fever I only dated top-tier-looking white women (mostly blondes, my favorite at the time).
Asian women are attractive if you have a fetish for epicanthic folds, but other than that they are not so great. They are however good for White males who cannot get with a decent looking White women and don’t want to settle for some bitchy mid-tier White female and instead want an Asian who will worship them.
�
You got it all wrong, man.
I HAD mixed feeling about the CCP ( like every Chinese ) from being bombarded by the disinformation campaign in Hk, Taiwan ( I lived there too) and Western media for the last 20 years but I have come to see the CCP as the saviour of all Chinese people. Xi is a great leader and will guide China to a great Han-naissance. This is best time to be a Chinese in the last 1000 years. Unity and camaraderie is the only way we can prevail in the coming civilisational struggle between East and West. You are right that most HKer still have superiority complex ( and inferiority complex to whitey) but I assure you I am different from them. These Hanjian å°é»ƒäºº are all moving to the West now so that’s the best outcome.
No one hates Hanjian 漢奸 more than I do.
I am proud to be a Chinaman. My kin have achieved more than I ever imagined when I first went to China in 1995. This pandemic have awaken every Chinese. I also think that it is too early to rest on our laurels and we need to vigilant against hubris. There are many problems in China.
Godfree said he was not praising China but trying to warn the West about China’s rise. He actually said he have been doing it for a long time without any results. He is not pro-China, he sees China as a threat. It is an insidious form of reverse psyop to galvanise Americans to catch up. He wants another Sputnik moment. I am surprised you and others don’t see it by now. I have always been skeptical of his motivations and glad to be vindicated. What we need is 拋光隱晦, not 夜郎自大.
This is not the time for a victory lap but China is is at its most dangerous hour as the barbarian are really at the gates now. We don’t want a repeat of 八國è¯è», do we ?
China ripped of high speed rail technology from Japan and France. Their Maglev is German (Siemens) technology.
China’s commercial aircraft manufacturing uses Western Avionics and technology theft fromt he West. They copied Russian fighter engine and airframe technology. Plus they ripped off American technology when Israel sold them the technology in the Israeli Lavi fighter, which burrowed American technology
China is only a dominant economic power right now because Western policy wonks and the donor class enabled, helped it, and turned a blind eye to the unprecendented intellectual property theft. If the Western establishment ever get their act together and cut China off from technology, they aren’t going to dominate.
China studied and improved high-speed rail technologies from other countries. Modern technologies are so complex, what’s the point of reinvent the wheel? When it comes to science and technology, it’s always the case that everyone learns from everyone else, while industrial espionage is universal.
China buys civilian avionics and aviation technologies from western companies in the hope that their civil airliners will be competitive on the international market in the future. Their military aviation use domestic products almost exclusively, including engines nowadays. Even their 5th gen. fighter J-20 is being equipped with domestic WS-10C, while the high bypass WS-20 sees application on the strategic air lifter Y-20 starting this year.
China becomes the world’s dominant power because it not only established the world’s largest manufacturing base and built some of the world’s best infrastructure, it also created some of the world’s best academic institutions and R&D programs.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-01227-6
Some examples of China’s recent achievements: 5G/6G, quantum communications, quantum computer, Hualong One 3rd gen. nuclear reactor, fusion reactor, Beidou Satellite Navigation, Chang’e-5 moon sample return mission, HIV vaccine , Million-Mile EV Battery, super-fast-charging battery.
Finally, with the signing of RCEP and the soon to be ratified EU-China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment, any anti-China alliance, not matter it’s Transpacific, Indo-Pacific, or Transatlantic, will remain a pipe dream. So keep telling yourself that China has stolen its way to the top, or China is containable in any shape or way, if that makes you feel any better.
Biden has already thrown BLM under the bus. BLM served as a conduit of funds to the DNC. Their job complete, they are disposable until more street violence is needed. Next, Biden has to revive our military efforts in Syria and gear up for the propaganda and ultimately, the military campaign against Iran. Take pleasure in seeing Biden screw his base almost as much as Trump screwed his.
I don’t think the elite believe their social justice bullshit as much as many of us think they do. Yes, they’ll tolerate the articulate negro, muslim, whatever in their midst. And publicly, they’ll throw a few bones to the ghetto thugs. But they probably believe in it as much as Elon Musk’s investors believe in the profitability of martian colonies. It’s a cover for something.
Black males don’t need to commit suicide, they can always get a brother to off them.
Does it really brake down in terms of gender?
The signaling of virtue is a problem that bedevils the design of consumer and marketing surveys.
�
I mean, it makes sense. The long period of incapacity during pregnancy and the task of childrearing mean you need a steady flow of resources. Conformity is a good way to do that–you don’t want to stray too far away from the herd, and women who wanted to be ‘pioneers’ often had to forgo family life.
Men are more free to take risks given our longer fertile period (you can wait until 40 if it actually gets you rich, though for most of us it’s a bad idea) and desire to stand out (demonstrating confidence and the ability to succeed despite deviance) and gamble on high-risk, high-reward strategies.
It makes as much sense to ding women for conformity as it does men for violence–it’s what we were made to do. Whether by evolution or God (or both!), take your pick.
There is no data to support your assumptions at all. White men with Asian women are the most attractive:
1. University educated males who have studied a STEM discipline2. Elon Musk’s ‘Pedo guyâ€Overall, such an arrangement is beneficial to both parties, the White guys get some and the Asian females have the prospects of “upgrading their genesâ€
�
Swedish exexutives ditch their wives for Asian women in Singapore:http://kjonnsforskning.no/en/2015/09/blond-sexy-and-immigrant
In experiment 1, Caucasian participants rated own-race composites as more attractive than other-race composites, but only for male faces. However, mixed-race (Caucasian/Japanese) composites were significantly more attractive than own-race composites, particularly for the opposite sex.
�
Why Asian women are more beautiful:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13506285.2018.1475437
Not as posh as Chinese whiteness
In the US Swedish women were the whitest of the white, and they were sometimes over-sexualised. But Swedish whiteness did not fit into society in Singapore at all. According to Lundström there is much focus on whiteness in Singapore. Ads for skin whitening products are common, and whiteness is the ideal. But the ideal of beauty is not a white, blond western woman.“Western women were ranked below the Chinese in the racial hierarchy. The western whiteness is not as posh as the Singaporean, Chinese whiteness,†says Lundström.Swedish women in the US were very preoccupied with American men, whereas the Swedish women in Singapore were not the least interested in Asian men. They focused on their Swedish husbands. Asian women, on the other hand, represented a possible rival, since Swedish men found Asian women attractive.“The Swedish women in Singapore were almost desexualised. They felt less feminine,†says Lundström.But on the other hand they didn’t have to relate to local beauty standards. Most of the 13 women who lived in Singapore were accompanying spouses to working husbands. Their husbands’ job contracts included a house with a maid, swimming pool and tennis courts.
�
All races of men go for Asian or Latina women:
Marriages between White men and Asian women are over twice as frequent as those between White women and Asian men. Recent research has proposed that this imbalance may be explained by the finding that, on average, White men are perceived as more attractive than Asian men, and Asian women are perceived as more attractive than White women, possibly because Asian faces are perceived as more feminine than White faces. Here, we explore whether Asian faces are perceived as more feminine than White faces. Thirty-five Malaysian Chinese (20 male) and 30 Australian White (12 male) participants manipulated 100 face photographs (50 Asian; 50 White; half male) on a masculinity/femininity axis to optimize attractive appearance. As predicted, White women’s faces were increased more in femininity than Asian women’s faces, and White men’s faces were feminized more than Asian men’s faces to optimize attractiveness. These findings suggest that White faces are perceived as more masculine than Asian faces.
�
“Average white males and pedos have to settle for white women, Asian women can afford much higher standards.”
No kidding!
Victor: Thank you for acknowledging my vocabulary. That trait is an indication of erudition as against dogmatism, which is your wont. “Pygmy Savages”!!! My oh my aren’t we a wonderful exemplar of the spirit of love for all as we are taught was the way of Jesus. Dogmatic AND hypocritical. Typical.
The encouragement to rioting is real; but it is not stupid or well-intentioned. It proceeds from revolutionary totalitarianism.
US blacks, together with some other minorities with subversive claims, are being used as proletarians and peasants were by bolsheviks and maoists.
And now that the revolutionaries have stolen the elections, down will go the wall that protected the US from illegal immigration from Africa. The onslaught on freedom is only beginning.
Societies with multiple races can prosper if there is respect for law and order, and basic moral values.
Summarizing human intelligence in a single figure is dehumanizing, as it counts for nought wisdom and spiritual intelligence.
God does not dislike us for normal libido well not quite, but for libido dominandis – which manifests itself in homoexual dominance over other men. It may have happened that the odd ancient Jew tried to practised it but it was punishable by death. I don’t have to tell you that superior morals and sentiments that the West developed would not have been possible had the dissolute morals of these degenerate men, the type one hears of in prisons in the USA prevailed. Among the gifts Christianity brought from it’s Jewish roots was sexual continence, without which no moral progress is possible. I understand that homosexuals will always be with us, and many of us including myself find transgenders so alluring, but we must not succumb to promiscuity.
The woman was hysterical because people keep their whole lives on their phones now. It’s not just the cost of the phone.
Mobile telephony was a big win for people whose work really is “off the grid”–ex. construction trades. For everyone else, it’s merely a nice to have. Oooh, i’m never, ever, ever out of touch.
Unfortunately phone+social media seems like heroin to a fair number of women. They’d rather give up their children–if they have any–than their phone.
Maybe we’d all be better off with a phone-free-month once a year so everyone could be reminded what normal life is like. You talk to people–in person. And spend lots of time alone with your own thoughts. It’s not terrible. It’s kinda nice.
Take away phones maybe we’d have higher fertility and more sanity.
“Xinjiang, Qingdao, and the Western Provinces are not densely populated at all and have plenty of room to accommodate new immigrants”
First of it’s Qinghai. Qingdao is a beautiful city – but that is on the east coast. The reason Tibet and Xingjiang and Qinghai have such low population density is because they have incredibly harsh climates. You might as well recommend Greenland for European population expansion. The snow leopard population has been expanding in Qinghai – thankfully. But that’s the point – it’s a place for them – not major cities.
“You say China has its own problems, but the Asian supremacists and Han supremacists here ………. clearly believe that China has surpassed the US economically,”
The US – Germany – Japan still leads China in certain aspects of technology – but that is closing rapidly. In terms of economy – China already past the US in 2014 in GDP by Purchase Power Parity. It passed the US as the largest trading nation and the largest consumer market. So yes it has passed the US economically. But China has more people than the continent of Africa. There are still hundreds of millions of people who do not have developed world living standards. So yes the government has given the goal of developed status by 2035 and leading technologically by 2050. If I was a gambler – I would put it at 2030 for technology. 2035 seems reasonable for developed status in terms of HDI (human development index).
But I don’t understand why you want China to take in more migrants. You should hope that each continent is prosperous enough that people don’t “have to” migrate for economic reasons..
Well, I don't think you understood me. I never meant that China should take in all of Africa or something extreme like that. My only point was that China has hardly taken in any migrants at all, and that it could take in a lot more. Even if it didn't want to take in African migrants, it could still take in poor migrants from Asian countries (India, Burma, Indonesia, Laos, Cambodia, etc.), which might be more culturally compatible. Taking in Indian immigrants could go a long way in helping to bring reconciliation between China and India.
But China has more people than the continent of Africa. There are still hundreds of millions of people who do not have developed world living standards.
�
But I don’t understand why you want China to take in more migrants. You should hope that each continent is prosperous enough that people don’t “have to†migrate for economic reasons..Of course we all hope for that. We hope for many things. We hope for an end to war. We hope for an end to poverty, disease, and famine. At the same time, we have to deal with the reality of the world as it is, not as we would like it to be. I wish we lived in a world where nobody "had to" migrate. You are right. However, given that the world has a long way to go until we get to that point, humanity has to learn to live in harmony until then. We have to learn to get along with each other and develop greater social consciousness. China has integrated a fairly large number of African migrants in Guangzhou (maybe several hundred thousand, according to some estimates), proving that Africans can integrate into Chinese society and that Chinese and Africans can get along. Hong Kong is also another example where Indians and Pakistanis have become part of the cultural and social life of the city to a certain extent. That being said, China has the capacity to help out more, and it should look to South Korea, which has recently accepted many more migrants despite being more densely populated than China and having its own issues, as an example. Again, I'm not saying that China has to bear the burden of taking in all of Kenya or all of the Congo. It can create a new visa category that offers refugee status to people who are in desperate need and also limit the quota for people get this visa. Maybe 1 million people would be reasonable. That's all I'm saying.Replies: @antibeast, @showmethereal
�
Congratulations.
Thanks.
Always a pleasure to help a troll realize his true potential.
Enjoy your rituals involving holy prepuce and negrolatry
From a friend
Nihang #Sikhs killing #Turks and Kali drinking the blood of the slain Turks.
Dark blue of Khalsa represents blood thirsty Kali.
The Iron complexioned person sitting at top is called Sarb Loh an All Iron representation of Mahakal.
The ultimate bir-ras representation. pic.twitter.com/zNvBhdgoeT— Ninjamonkey 🇮🇳 (@Aryan_warlord) November 25, 2020
Link broken boomer it’s called Ashwamedha and your ancestors did it too.
Enjoy your ritual cannibalism and degrading European ancestors while being a ‘white nationalist’
Among the anthropologically defined 356 contemporary societies of Euro-Asia and Africa, there is a large and significant negative correlation between Christianization (for at least 500 years) and the absence of clans and lineages; (race)
Idk why you’re offended by western universalism being attacked. The Pagans get to poke fun at Holy Prepuce, the Christcucks can feast on it. 🤷â€â™€ï¸
Everyone gets a stronger identity instead of this soft globohomo bs.
No. He didn't give them any reason to. If the White man hadn't been the GOP's bitch for several decades, maybe they would have had to actually do something for you.
did white women vote for Trump at the same rate as white men?
�
No. We're more nationalist than you.
are white women as nationalistic as white men?
�
Caught in a lie, the misogynist screeches. Mr. McDermott, why are you bothering to moderate these comments if you're going to allow this? Just open up the thread and let us go at it.Replies: @Rurik, @Tony Massey
fuck off slag
�
Caught in a lie,
what lie?
according to your survey there, it suggests white women are more racially conscious and ethnically nationalist than white men.
But that is contrary to everything I’ve ever glimmered, living on this rock for nearly six decades.
Are white women more inclined to support white racialist politics- than white men?
Do they vote for (how did you put it?) ‘nativist’ politicians and policies more than white men do?
Or, is the truth completely different than what you and the survey are trying to suggest?
And more to the point, if I’m convinced that white women do not vote for or support white ethno-nationalistic policies more than men do, then how is saying that (obvious) truth~ a lie?
And if I’m simply stating what I consider to be the (obvious) truth, then by what kind of vicious and malicious motivation would you have for calling me a liar? (other than to be deliberately obnoxious)?
You know, I don’t mind when people disagree with me. Many do, and good on them for doing so, so long as they’re participating in good faith.
That’s my criteria for determining when someone deserves to be treated with the kind of decorum and respect that we should all aspire to here on Mr. Unz website.
But when someone dishonestly, and relentlessly calls me a liar, when I’m obviously telling the truth, then that sort of breaks the code, so to speak, and they lose all the respect that otherwise honest and decent people are entitled to, regardless of their opinions.
If I’m mistaken about something, (which is certainly possible) then I’m mistaken, (even tho in this case I’m not ; ), but it doesn’t mean I’m lying.
Do you understand the (very significant) difference?
And if you don’t, you have no business participating here on this forum, if you’re that dumb.
But sadly, I don’t think you’re that dumb. Rather I think you feel entitled to smear, lie, mischaracterize and otherwise conduct yourself like a pernicious slag, because what I said, or how I said it, made you angry, and wrathful, and so in your state of mind, you considered your feelings all the justification you needed to dishonestly call me a liar, when you (and everybody else) knows damn well I’ve been doing nothing but telling the truth.
Hmm, Bubi yourself!!
Not sure I follow your logic.
I am not a huge fan of Ferguson, but the Ferguson quote/info cited seems to me to support the contention that Britain was determined to get into a war with Germany (i.e., WW1).
Not sure how this plays into the Irving position, but it seems to me that placing more responsibility on Britain for fanning the flames of war pre-WW1 would tend to support the gist of Irving’s contentions, or at least his general revisionist stance as to who were the true “villains” of WW2.
This statement is absurd on its face. There is not nothing: nothing does not and cannot exist. In fact there is only everything. We call it the universe. And some of us refer to the whole of everything as God. Is Yahweh the whole of everything? Obviously not. Yahweh is nothing, because Yahweh does not exist.So what is this Nothing you say exists? Where does it exist and how do you know about it? You say there is only dust and nothingness, this is so wrong. There is only dust and energy.Everything is real and nothing is not.Namaste(And a special fuck you to all the lurking Christian apologists. If you want to have faith in nonsense that’s fine. If you want to promote certain moral teachings that’s fine. But if you must validate your faith through fake history, and then defend that fake history because your survival depends on it, you’re not defending your faith, you’re defending a fraud.)Replies: @ViktorTempleton, @Dacian
There is Nothing
�
You people seem to get awfully mad when somebody proves you wrong. Debunk the miracles I have shown you, or shut up.
I am not white and I am racist…as other non whites are also (Most JEWS). I am a racist because I believe that the closest you are/remain to your race the higher your IQ and they usually lead more productive peaceful lives. Its good that we used the term average IQ because even among the same race there are wide differences in IQ..is it nationality? rural vrs Urban? CLASS$$?? etc. BUT I can not understand, explain, ascertain, comprehend this obsession with IQ specially among WHITE non jews in today AMERICA…the jewish/cartels had exploited blacks, hispanics, women, lgbt, etc. to their advantage wisely and obviously susccesfully (BLAMANTIFA). On teh other hand this obsession with IQ among (some) WHITES is counterproductive it furthers divides and demolishes any hope for a MULTICULTURAL MAGA NATIONALIST movement in USA… BLACKS HISPANICS ASIANS etc, are a FACT of everyday life in AMERICA today…WHITES non jews not yet understand the virtues of living “present CONCIOUSNESS” …lets remember that communism says to each according to his/her necessities and from each according to his/her labor..CAPITALISM (multicultural) must be FROM each according to hi/her condition (iq),,,from eac accodring to his capacity…CAPITALISM has the virtue f of allocating resources efficiently even LABOR,and salaries …IT follows that each individual regardless of his/her race will rise/fall according to his/her capacity (iq)…unfourtuanley JEWISH SOCIAL engineers that seek jewish supremacy use blacks, andother non whites to subvert, displace, desinetgrate. erase teh white race…BUT denying blacks (because of iq)they rightful place within a MAGA NATIONALIST MOVEMENT is not only UNproductive, misguided it is just DUMB…stupidity..
Hmm. The second wave of the Spanish Flu was perfectly synchronized with Communist Revolutions across the entire planet in November 1918 - June 1919. The Covid Flu was perfectly synchronized with the "Great Reset", "Climate Crisis" and of course the "Food Revolution" of 2020.
"But you yourselves perfectly know that to produce the possibility of the expression of such wishes by all the nations it is indispensable to trouble in all countries the people’s relations with their governments so as to utterly exhaust humanity with dissension, hatred, struggle, envy and even by the use of torture, by starvation, BY THE INOCULATION OF DISEASES, by want, so that the goyim see no other issue than to take refuge in our complete sovereignty in money and all else.
But if we give nations of the world a breathing space, the moment we long for is hardly likely to ever arrive."
�
Indeed if they are a forgery then they are a prophetic forgery..
also, they are often described as forgery, a forgery is merely a copy of an original, a fake also..
the implication being that there is an original.
https://christianobserver.net/maurice-joly-plagiarized-protocols-of-zion-not-vice-versa/
"According to De Michelis the version that Nilius published in 1905 does not directly derive from the earliest known version published by Krusevan in 1903. This is evidence that there was an earlier version than Krusevan (1903)."
...
"The story goes that Sergei Nilius got the document in 1897 but Okhrana learned of it and Pyotr Rachkovsky forbade him from publishing the document. In 1902 an unknown woman, probably not from Okhrana, had offered a different version of Protocols to Menshikov in April 1902 and this version had been published by Krusevan in 1903, but the Nilius version was not yet published."
...
After Napoleon III had fallen, French governments included many Jews and Freemasons all the time until the world war. As Rachkovsky wanted the Franco-Russian alliance, he would not have ordered any of his men to write the Protocols, which states that minister Léon Bourgeois is a trusted agent of Judeo-Masonic Elders and implies that the document is from the time circa 1895, and he would not base the conspiracy to France. At the time London and New York were the banking centers of the world. Thus, Okhrana did not write the Protocols.
...
"The Protocols are most probably based on real documents of the Paris Mizraim lodge, L’Arc en Ciel, and these documents may have been obtained around 1884, agreeing with the story how Glinka got them. But the Protocols have been worked out of these papers and the book of Maurice Joly, and the Protocols were finished around 1895."
�
https://pedoempire.org/chapter-27-the-rothschild-banking-dynasty-how-zionist-luciferian-overlords-came-to-rule-the-earth/
"Joly, a Jew whose real name was Joseph Levy, was a lifelong Mason and member of the “Lodge of Mizraim†where the Protocols document originated. He was the protege of Adolph Cremieux (Isaac Moise Cremieux 1796-1880) the head of the lodge, founder of the Alliance Israélite Universelle and a Minister in the Jewish-backed government of Leon Gambetta.The plot is described in the Protocols as “centuries-old.†It most likely predates “Dialogue.†Joly was well versed in the Protocols and borrowed from it to flesh out the unpopular authoritarian position of Machiavelli, which he ascribed to Napoleon III.Joly, who committed suicide in 1879, was in the habit of “borrowing.†He is accused of plagiarizing a popular novel by Eugene Sue, namely “Les Mystères du Paris.†(1845) Also his work is predated by another of Cremieux’s proteges, Jacob Venedy, entitled, “Machiavelli, Montesquieu, Rousseau.†(1850)In 1884 Mme. Justine Glinka, the daughter of a Russian General living in Paris, hired Joseph Schorst, a member of Joly’s Mizraim Lodge to obtain sensitive information. For the sum of 2500 francs, Schorst provided Glinka with “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.†He was subsequently tracked down and murdered in Egypt."
�
https://boards.christogenea.org/forum/historical-studies/modern-history/3315-the-jewish-role-in-french-revolution
"Were it not for Justine Glinka, daughter of a Russian general in 1884 living in France notifying General Orgevskii in St. Petersburg,[160] who sent 2,500 francs for Justine to buy a pilfered copy of the Protocols from her assistant Joseph Schoerst, a member of the Paris Jewish Mizraim Masonic Lodge, the world may never have even known about this historically revealing document."
�
So the Misraim/Mizraim lodge was the original "source" of the Protocols, and that very same lodge was also played a significant role in the Jacobian destruction of Christian France in 1789. Yet from LAURENT GUYÉNOT we recently learnt that the Misraim cult was active back when the entire Christian Church got started with their Gospels and New Testament, or likely even hundreds or thousands of years earlier.Replies: @Hillaire
"Out of them broke the ruthless and invariable orientation: exterminate all the kings and the race of the Bourbons, destroy the power of the Pope, preach freedom of peoples and found a universal republic (18). The Jews had inspired Masonic rites and secretly ran their obedience. The rite of Clermont, created in 1754, had been scattered in throughout Germany, by the outrageous Protestant pastor, the Jew of Portuguese origin Samuel Rosas. The three rites that divided the so-called Egyptian Freemasonry came from Jewish sources: the Coptic, from the Sicilian Jew Joseph Balsamo, who used the pseudonym of Count Cagliostro; the Misraïm, name of Egypt in the Bible, from the three Bedarride brothers, Jews of Avignon; the Memphis, from Samuel Honis, Jew from Cairo (19)."
�
Around ‘00 a receptionist named Queen Udofia, fired by a SV architectural firm, sued for race discrimination. She had charged up a credit card shorthopped from the inter-office mailer.
If this is the same young lady (at the time), her bio is as you might expect:
Around ‘00 a receptionist named Queen Udofia, fired by a SV architectural firm, sued for race discrimination. She had charged up a credit card shorthopped from the inter-office mailer.
�
Graduating summa cum laude as a double major in African-American Studies and philosophy, with a minor in education, Udofia hopes to pursue a career in law. With her extensive list of achievements, which include becoming a UCLA School of Law Fellow and, most recently named UCLA’s Senior of the Year, Udofia is well on her way to rising to the top of the legal community and becoming a great role model for future Bruins.
�
It feels to me there’s a recurrent pattern of Indians online insulting Europeans and championing their supposed superiority, only to get extremely angry and butthurt when they’re inevitably destroyed by FACTS and LOGIC.
It’s odd, because you don’t see Chinese, Turks or even the Arab world so obsessively engaging in such aggressive online behaviour, presumably because they have or had real achievements. When was the last genuinely indigenous significant Indian civilisation? The Guptas? The Cholas? Practically in antiquity anyway.
Ð’Ñе равно, Ñ Ð½Ð¾Ð²Ñ‹Ð¼ годом
Did you miss out on the KARA BOÄžA meme?Arabs merely wish for death upon Europe, while crying about Islamophobia and burning French goods (after they have paid money for them) in protest.The Chinese are nicely sequestered behind their Great Wall.
It’s odd, because you don’t see Chinese, Turks or even the Arab world so obsessively engaging in such aggressive online behaviour
�
I think he was being sarcastic….
> Go run around the woods
Why are you desert-cultist in such rebellion against mother nature’s trees? You despise any indigenous—i.e., native/nationalist—religion, including the White man’s. The White man used to worship his native gods among a blessed grove of trees, at least until jew-addled globalist–internationalist missionaries cut them down.
Painting source: ABC News, 2016
Yet the symbol of the White man’s indigenous religion lives inside your living room (unless your wife took it down early.) Repent, White man, before you die in thrall to a foreign middle-eastern desert Rabbi. Hug a tree today, like all of your native ancestors did before being conquered by jewish fanaticism. You can again be as loyal as a holy fir through the winter of our discontent.
♫ O Tannenbaum 🎄 O Tannenbaum, how loyal are your needles! ♪
Such ignorance. Viktor, you don’t appear to even understand the difference between pedophilia and pederasty, to say nothing of ephebephilia. Any fully sexual relationships between adults and pre-pubescent children can be quite damaging to the latter, both physically and psychologically. This may not be the case with horny adolescents.
However, the blackmailing regime commencing with the self-hating drag-queen J. Edna Hoover and more recently with hundreds of prostiticians, ranking military officers and others sucked into their dragnets by the likes of Epstein, the Maxwells and Wexner; those very prostiticians were drawn into passing legislation where adolescents were infantilized under both state and federal laws. That made things very easy for the likes of the Mossad and the CIA to keep their marks in line and ensure the parades to prison on the part of those who might be considered as “collateral damage”.
Up until very recent times, historically, the last hundred years at most, teens were generally treated as adults in even this deeply corrupted culture. Adolescent-adult relationships of all types were commonplace throughout the Western experience—some of them included a sexual side. Generally, but not exclusively they were samesex. However, within my own family background, my 20 Y.O. grandfather married my grandmother when she was 15 and bore her first child before her 16th birthday. Nowadays, that’s highly frowned upon within our infantilizing nanny-culture.
Both during the American Revolution and the Civil War, man-youth relationships appear from the historical record to have been quite commonplace. Teenage guys are besotted with libidinal energy. In France, many married women are delighted to cater to horny young studs. Generally, their husbands also have mistresses, so their relationships totter along.
From what I recall of the U.S. between the late 60’s and mid to late 80’s was that with the advent of the Pill, teen boys and girls were happily getting it on. Not many years later divorce rates skyrocketed. Any connection there? Early indulgence between the sexes within the same age group is highly contra-cultural. Once they start sleeping around serially, young people have a difficult time adjusting to faithful marriages.
Though Gore Vidal may have had some Jewish ancestry on his paternal side, that does not appear to be the case among his matrilineal Gores. To the best of my knowledge the man never identified as Jewish. So it appears yours judgementality is showing just a bit. That’s a rather commonplace affliction among the JudieChristies.
” is that as Christians, the White race ruled the world and reached their highest accomplishments”
Except that goes against everything said in the gospels and the epistles…. “supposing that godliness is a way of gain”… that leads to many dangerous and hurtful lusts…
Heed the words of the Messiah “the last will be first and the first will be last”. There are many good reasons to return to the scriptures – but power and might are NOT the reasons
You hit the nail on the head.
another one!
Your claim that White women are omnipotent is particularly risible
�
'creep, petulant child'.
like the petulant child you are.
�
are you suggesting that a majority of white women don't think women should be in combat?Meanwhile, here on planet Earth, �
because women demand to be Marines and firemen �
ahh, I was too kind in referring to you as an ogress. That's unfair to ogresses everywhere.
A little math to show how stupid and irrational your hatred of women is:
�
saying white women are omnipotent would be the height of idiocy, and so that’s why you (also) dishonestly mischaracterize what I said.
When I said that White women are as opposed to affirmative action as White men, you said:
If that were true, there’d be no affirmative action.
In other words, White women get what we want.
are you suggesting that a majority of white women don’t think women should be in combat?
A huge majority of men and women (73% and 76%, respectively) support women in combat roles, if they so desire. But therein lies the problem with your argument. Hardly any actually want these jobs, even among those who are already in the military!
This is a big fat nothing burger. There have always been exceptional women who engage in gender-atypical activities. With so few volunteering, it’s safe to assume that these are indeed exceptional women. Whether fitness standards should be changed to accommodate women is another question.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/feb/25/us-army-women-combat-jobs-survey
https://news.gallup.com/poll/160124/americans-favor-allowing-women-combat.aspx
I simply wondered out loud
Lol my achin’ sides! The dispassionate scholar routine, again.
I just think they’re more naturally compassionate than men, and that was my only point.
Indeed, and that’s precisely why depriving women of the franchise would be a terrible idea. We need safe, humane prisons, provision for the elderly, wage and hour protections, child labor laws, etc.
Of course, there is certainly such a thing as too much of a good thing, and you’d definitely have too much compassion with an all-female electorate, but noone is suggesting that men be disenfranchised. The beauty of complementarity is that we balance each other out. As the ideal home includes both a mother and a father, so the ideal electorate includes both men and women.
not quiteIn other words, White women get what we want.If that were true, there’d be no affirmative action.
When I said that White women are as opposed to affirmative action as White men, you said:
�
�
�
but my argument is against the rationality of the policy, not the actual number of women serving.
But therein lies the problem with your argument. Hardly any actually want these jobs, even among those who are already in the military! �
It goes to the heart of the sanity and moral health of a nation/civilization.
This is a big fat nothing burger.
�
Indeed. And if they can muster the wherewithal, then I'd have no problem with letting women play in the NFL, or anywhere else they can prove they're up to the standards. Even as firefighters, or what have you. If they are up to the standards. But I wouldn't send women to fight men with guns, as a matter of principle.
There have always been exceptional women who engage in gender-atypical activities �
wowIndeed, and that’s precisely why depriving women of the franchise would be a terrible idea. We need safe, humane prisons, provision for the elderly, wage and hour protections, child labor laws, etc.
[women are] more naturally compassionate than men
�
Of course, there is certainly such a thing as too much of a good thing, and you’d definitely have too much compassion with an all-female electorate, but noone is suggesting that men be disenfranchised. The beauty of complementarity is that we balance each other out. As the ideal home includes both a mother and a father, so the ideal electorate includes both men and women.
�
‘The aristocratic and upper middle class did not do too well either. It is striking how bad WW1 generals were, their tactics not keeping pace with technology and huge slaughter among their troops was the result.’
There may have also been a simple problem with coordinating and controlling such huge masses — particularly given that the shelling was going to promptly destroy what ability there was to control those masses. I believe it was Loos that first clearly demonstrated this inability to find out what the hell was happening and respond appropriately — but maybe it was some other early slaughter.
Largely, German infiltration tactics can be seen as a solution to this. ‘We’re not going to be able to tell you what to do next — so here’s how you decide for yourself and keep going.’
But that took several years to come up with. Equally to the point, it went directly against the European tradition of very rigidly controlled masses of perfectly drilled troops doing exactly as they were told — although the Prussians had begun emphasizing initiative among their junior commanders back in 1866-70.
But more generally, the First World War presented the spectacle of huge and unwieldy masses of men lurching forward clumsily into devastating artillery and machine-gun fire, coming to a halt, and then not getting told what to do next. Put that way, it becomes more of a problem of technology and communication than of the individual inadequacy of the commanders.
https://www.rt.com/news/511261-canada-minister-resigns-lockdown/
The hypocrisy of it all. Everyone went on vacation during this “crisis”. Vacations are, after all, essential travel. The internet needs to regress back to 2005 days. Its empowering plebs to stay in full-retard mode.