RSS
“Point and splutter.” I think it was Steve Sailer who devised that term to describe a common tactic of the left. When leftists want to expose an academic or writer as a bad person who should lose his job and be driven out of respectable society, they don’t use facts, logic and reasoned argument. No, they simply quote something that is self-evidently wicked in the eyes of all right-thinking — that is, left-thinking — people. In other words, they point at wickedness and splutter in outrage. They don’t attempt to address the arguments of the anathematized.
“Racist, pseudoscientific phrenology”
For example, when leftists wanted to expose the Jewish philosopher Nathan Cofnas as a nasty Nazi, they quoted self-evident thought-crime in his writing. But they didn’t address his arguments or evidence. Cofnas has described their point-and-splutter like this:
[The leftist journalist Elizabeth] Haigh declares that my “paper was widely debunked by various scientists” and makes the assertion (of dubious grammaticality) that “He argued against the idea of racism and structural racism for difference between peoples’ achievements, saying some groups of people are ‘unfairly blamed’”. She doesn’t give any details about the alleged debunking of my article. The fact that some unnamed “various scientists” criticised me for saying something politically unpopular is enough to try to start a campaign to threaten my employment. Haigh revealed her intentions more explicitly later when she retweeted a thread about me by a linguistics PhD student which said, “we have to stop letting ‘intelligence researchers’ dress up their racist, pseudoscientific phrenology and pretend it’s anything other than nonsense. these people should not have jobs. they shouldn’t be tolerated in polite society.” (“My ‘debunked’ views,” The Critic, 2nd November 2022)
To leftists, ideas like those are self-evidently wicked and unacceptable. If someone espouses them in public, what more need be said? Cofnas is a crimethinker. Vaporize him! That’s point-and-splutter. Obviously, Cofnas thinks that this is a highly unfair tactic. But he also has to admit that it’s highly effective. Presumably that’s why he decided to employ it against the Occidental Observer and me. He pointed-and-spluttered in one of his critiques of Kevin MacDonald:
Here is a passage from a recent, representative article published in The Occidental Observer:
He’s Jugly, as you might say: that is, he’s ugly in a characteristically Jewish way. I agree with a fascinating article at [the neo-Nazi magazine] National Vanguard arguing that “Jews themselves are an unattractive and, on average, ugly people” and that “Jews, as a group, oppose beauty.”…And why are Jews and leftists “on average, ugly people”?…And ugly Jewish brains have consistently created ugly ideologies that war on the “indissoluble Trinity of Truth, Beauty and Goodness.” (Langdon, 2021)
So MacDonald thinks that “there are no good Jews, nor can they be good” is a “good rule of thumb.” […] As editor of The Occidental Observer and The Occidental Quarterly [MacDonald] regularly publishes nasty, scientifically baseless screeds against Jews. (“Still No Evidence for a Jewish Group Evolutionary Strategy,” Evolutionary Psychological Science, Volume 9, pages 236—259, 6th January 2023)
First of all, this article is hardly representative. TOO has posted very few articles on the topic of facial appearance. Cofnas is clearly cherry-picking an article he thinks will be effective in appealing to his audience. How about this series of articles by Szilard Csonthegyi on Bela Kun and Jewish-Hungarian conflict? Or pick anything by Andrew Joyce, Brenton Sanderson, Horus, or Marshall Yeats—not to mention MacDonald’s refutations of Cofnas—just to name a few.
And it’s ridiculous to claim that MacDonald thinks “there are no good Jews, nor can they be good.” Ron Unz has established perhaps the premier website for the dissident right, with many articles critical of Jews, including articles from TOO. Amy Wax, who invited Jared Taylor to her class at UPenn is another one that comes to mind. And Stephen Miller, Trump-administration stalwart on immigration (disowned by his synagogue). There are many more. But they don’t represent the power and influence of the mainstream Jewish community which is the main topic of TOO.
But more importantly, Cofnas is pointing-and-spluttering at my article “The Cult of Ugly: Leftist Lies, Jewish Junk, and the Malign Martyrdom of George Floyd.” He regards it as an example of the “nasty, scientifically baseless screeds against Jews” regularly published by Kevin MacDonald. Leftists have, of course, dismissed Cofnas’ own work as “nasty, scientifically baseless screeds against” Blacks and other non-Whites. They would also be happy to “debunk” Cofnas by noting that “the neo-Nazi magazine” National Vanguard shares his views on racial differences in intelligence. Well, I think that leftists are wrong about Cofnas’ ideas just as I think Cofnas is wrong about mine. In his ironically titled article “My ‘debunked’ views,” Cofnas reached this conclusion: “The reason we’re not allowed — on pain of (at least attempted) cancellation — to have frank discussions about the hereditarian hypothesis isn’t because it’s been ‘debunked’, but because it hasn’t been debunked.”
A short guide to debunking nasty Nazis like Nathan
I agree with that conclusion. But I also think that it applies to my pernicious punim hypothesis (punim is Yiddish for “face”). The reason decent people do not have frank discussions about Jewish ugliness isn’t because it’s been “debunked,” but because the reality upsets Jews like Nathan Cofnas. That’s why the topic is covered only in “nasty” publications like the Occidental Observer and “the neo-Nazi magazine” National Vanguard. Oh, and at TakiMag, where the Jewish writer David Cole once issued this “nasty, scientifically baseless screed”:
Christmas is supposed to be a holiday for Christians, but this year Santa’s bringing a very special present for America’s Jews: the gift of seeing Ruth Bader Ginsburg the way we wish she looked. Opening in theaters December 25th, On the Basis of Sex tells the story of a plucky young RBG as she risks everything in a quest to become a nationally known feminist hero. …
The actress portraying the young Ginsburg is Birmingham-born Felicity Jones, a Brit who is most definitely not Jewish, unlike the brittle SCOTUS [Supreme Court of the United States] scarecrow she’s portraying. In fact, Jones could not look less Jewish if she tried. This girl is so Aryan, she could give Himmler’s corpse a boner. And yet she’s portraying a woman who — hmm, how to put this gently? — is the reason Jewish men often date outside the flock. Not since Warren Beatty d ecided to portray Dick Tracy without facial prosthetics has there been a greater physical disconnect between actor and subject. […]
So we [Jews] don’t mind the idealized images, because in a way they give us comfort. We don’t see what we can never become, but what we can [with the help of plastic surgery]. … She [Ginsburg]’s probably as pumped as everyone else to see her ethnically cleansed onscreen depiction.
Well, actually, not everyone’s pumped. It took some searching, but I finally found a roaring dissent in the sea of silence regarding the Ginsburg/Jones ethnic switcheroo. Marissa Korbel is a self-described “bleeding heart lawyer” and “award-winning essayist” who writes for Harper’s Bazaar, Guernica, and Bitch magazine. Last week, she penned a piece for the online literary journal The Rumpus that I’d wager is the single most honest piece of writing on the ’net regarding Jews and the Aryanization of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. … But don’t expect Korbel’s essay to be picked up by national Jewish news and opinion sites. Even its concluding and comforting descent into leftist banality can’t make up for the disquieting honesty of the rest of it. We Jews are generally an introspective lot, but every now and then we encounter an abyss into which even we prefer not to gaze, lest we find Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s Semitic mug gazing back at us. (“Ruth Bader Ginsburg… Shiksa?”, Taki Mag, 25th December 2018)
Yucky yenta becomes yummy shiksa: Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Felicity Jones
Like the neo-Nazis at National Vanguard and the anti-Semites at the Occidental Observer, David Cole at TakiMag is what might be called an ideological outlaw. Like them and us, he isn’t scared of “cancellation” and exile from respectable society because he’s already been cancelled and exiled. I’ve already said that I admire the moral courage of Nathan Cofnas and his willingness to address the dangerous topic of racial difference. But his moral courage will only take him so far. He doesn’t share Cole’s honesty and willingness to address the dangerous topic of Jewish ugliness and Jewish envy of White beauty. That’s perfectly understandable. What would happen if Cofnas addressed that topic, even without Cole’s bluntness and brutality? He’d anger and upset his fellow Jews, of course. Literally or metaphorically, he’d make his yiddishe momme cry. And he doesn’t want to do that.
Ashkenazi inbreeding
I think that’s why Cofnas pointed-and-spluttered about my article “The Cult of Ugly.” But I don’t think he was fair to the article. First of all, it argues that ugliness is characteristic of leftists, not just of Jews. Does Cofnas agree with that description of leftists or at least accept it as legitimate? Does he accept the scientific work finding that the right tend to be more attractive and healthier in various ways than the left? I linked in the article to the scientific ideas of Edward Dutton, who argues that leftism in general, and antifa in particular, is the ideology of “spiteful mutants.” Modern life and vastly reduced rates of infant mortality have relaxed selection against deleterious mutations, which are now affecting the brains and psychology of far more people. Leftists would, of course, reject Dutton’s ideas as “nasty” and “scientifically baseless.” Does Cofnas agree with the left?
I also said this in the article: “As for Jews and the ugliness of both their punims [faces] and their brains, note the studies that have identified marked inbreeding and higher rates of mental illness among Jews.” Gregory Cochran and Henry Harpending have famously argued that selection among Jews for higher intelligence has also produced higher rates of neurological disease. Emil Kirkegaard has argued that raw intelligence and mental illness both contribute to Jewish genius. These studies are perfectly scientific. Does Cofnas accept that Ashkenazi Jews like himself are highly inbred and subject to higher rates of mental illness? If so, does he agree that this might influence the appearance, art and ideologies of Jews for the worse? Or is that completely impossible?
Distinctive personalities (and punims)
Let’s examine an interesting statement made by Cofnas in his anti-KMac paper at Evolutionary Psychological Science: “The fact that stereotypes tend to have a basis in reality (Jussim et al., 2015, 2016) and that Jews have been consistently stereotyped as having distinctive personalities — for example, as being ‘shrewd’ (Brigham, 1971) — provides preliminary support for the hypothesis of personality differences.” As Cofnas is presumably well aware, Jews have also been consistently stereotyped as having distinctive punims. To be blunt, there is a stereotype of Jewish ugliness. Does Cofnas accept that this stereotype could have “a basis in reality”? And is Cofnas himself distressed or disturbed by references to Jewish ugliness? He characterizes my article as “nasty,” which is an emotive rather than a scientific term. I can assure him that, to the best of my conscious knowledge, I was not seeking to distress Jews or leftists in any way. Instead, I was seeking to explore what I regard as a real and important phenomenon: the relationship between harmful leftist ideologies and the disproportionate ugliness of the people who espouse them.
Stereotype and reality #1: drawing of Jew by David Cole’s friend Nick Bougas, “aka A. Wyatt Mann;” photograph of Alan Ginsberg
Stereotype and reality #2: Jews have been consistently stereotyped as having distinctive punims (I can’t identify the couple in the photograph)
Cofnas himself undoubtedly recognizes that many Blacks and other non-Whites are distressed and disturbed by his claims about racial differences in intelligence. His work is “nasty” for them. It does not follow that it is also “scientifically baseless.” Now, I can perfectly understand and sympathize with non-Whites who are distressed by any claim that their particular racial group is of lower average intelligence. I can also see that their distress will be greater, not lesser, if the claim is scientifically strong and realistic. As the saying goes: The truth hurts. That’s why a crude statement like “Blacks are stupid” is hurtful to Blacks. It conforms to what Blacks reluctantly recognize as reality. The truth hurts.
The power of punim: some examples of characteristically Jewish ugliness
However, “Jews are stupid” isn’t at all hurtful to Jews. They know it doesn’t conform to reality. What’s hurtful to many or even most Jews is the crude statement “Jews are ugly.” And I think it’s hurtful to Jews because the it conforms to what Jews reluctantly recognize as reality. I also think that Nathan Cofnas is among the Jews who are emotionally hurt by claims about Jewish ugliness. Whether or not Cofnas will admit this is up to him. My evidence would include this selfie posted by Cofnas at his Substack site:
Jewish punim, gentile architecture: Nathan Cofnas poses at Emmanuel College, Cambridge
I don’t think that Nathan Cofnas is (hmm, how to put this gently?) a facially attractive individual. I also wonder about his full motives for choosing to pose in that particular location. The architectural background is beautiful. The facial foreground is less so. Now, I’m sure that Cofnas recognizes and appreciates the beauty of Cambridge University. And it would be perfectly understandable and acceptable that he felt pride at being a high-flier there. But I wonder whether the selfie was also expressing triumph over those surroundings in some way. The handsome goy Robert Taylor once starred in a movie called A Yank at Oxford (1938). Is Cofnas’ selfie intended to proclaim “A Kike at Cambridge”? (Please note that I’m using the term “kike” as an ironic Jew like Cofnas might use it, not to insult Cofnas.) After all, it contains an obvious contrast between beautiful gentile architecture and an unattractive Jewish punim.
That Jews can have hostile feelings about beautiful gentile architecture is proved by the Jewish writer Sabrina Rubin Erdely, who promoted the not-so-infamous hate-hoax about a female student being raped on broken glass by a fraternity at the University of Virginia (UVA). Erdely set the scene for the non-existent crime by describing “throngs of toned, tanned and overwhelmingly blond students [who] fanned across a landscape of neoclassical brick buildings” at UVA.
Why would Jewish Sabrina Rubin Erdely resent “toned, tanned and overwhelmingly blond” gentiles? (image from Wikipedia)
As Steve Sailer pointed out, dark-haired Erdely’s hate-hoax was clearly powered by anti-gentile malice. That’s why she wrote of “overwhelmingly blond students” and “neoclassical brick buildings.” I’d hypothesize that unattractive Nathan Cofnas shares some of unattractive Sabrina Erdely’s resentment about the beauty of White gentiles and their architecture. That isn’t a scientific hypothesis, of course. But that doesn’t make it impossible to verify. If Cofnas confirmed such feelings in himself, that would be a good proof. But if Cofnas denied them, I don’t think that would be a good disproof, just as I don’t think leftist denials are a good disproof of Cofnas’ claims about racial difference. Leftists think that Cofnas’ ideas are “nasty” and “scientifically baseless.” Cofnas thinks they’re wrong. So do I. But I also think that Cofnas is wrong to describe “The Cult of Ugly” as “nasty” and “scientifically baseless.” There is science to support the idea of a connexion between physical ugliness and pernicious ideologies.
But let’s suppose that no such science exists or ever could exist. That would still not enable Cofnas to dismiss “The Cult of Ugly” out of hand as worthless. It may indeed contain worthless ideas and conjectures, but more work would be needed to establish this. As a philosopher, Cofnas is no doubt aware that there is a large and ancient branch of philosophy known as aesthetics, which studies topics like beauty and ugliness, and their relation to politics and morality. Due to its antiquity, aesthetics was “scientifically baseless” for many centuries. Much or even most of aesthetics is still “scientifically baseless” today. Does Cofnas regard that as a good reason to dismiss this field and reject all of its political and moral conclusions? I hope he doesn’t.
Resentment and distress
I also hope that Cofnas doesn’t reject Steve Sailer’s writing on ethno-aesthetics as “nasty” and “scientifically baseless.” Just as Sailer has devised the term “point and splutter” to satirize leftist dishonesty, so he’s devised the term “World War Hair” to satirize Black women’s resentment about the greater sexual attractiveness of White women. The ability to grow long, straight, glossy hair in various natural colors is one of several strong advantages White women possess over Black women in the sexual marketplace. And over other non-White women. Naturally enough, non-White women resent this trichological toxicity, which is part of why non-White women in the media so often announce “Let’s Talk About My Hair” (as Sailer again puts it). We already know that Cofnas regards my article about leftist and Jewish ugliness as a “nasty, scientifically baseless screed.” Does Cofnas regard Sailer’s writing on Black women’s resentment as “nasty” and “scientifically baseless” too? I very much doubt it.
If I’m right, then Cofnas’ double standard would be understandable, but also ethnocentric. Indeed, it would be understandable because it was ethnocentric. It would be perfectly natural that, as a Jew, Cofnas could accept discussion of Black imperfections in a way he couldn’t accept discussion of Jewish imperfections. But there are some imperfections that Blacks and Jews have in common. For example, both of them are groups that, in my opinion, don’t belong in White societies partly because of the resentment they feel about superior White beauty. I don’t think that Nathan Cofnas is the “nasty Nazi” that, because of his racial views, many leftists would describe him as. But I do think that he is one of the many Jews who feel resentment about White gentile beauty and concomitant distress at any discussion of Jewish ugliness. It’s up to him whether he confirms, denies or ignores this allegation.
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
One slightly odd element of this piece was the praise for Amy Wax. I’ve never met or had any real dealings with her, but my strong impression is that her ideological positions are almost exactly the same as those of Nathan Cofnas, who was ferociously attacked here.
If Cofnas had tenure and sufficient courage, I’d think that he would have been glad to invite Jared Taylor to speak before some students just like Wax did. However, I very much doubt that he’d ever invite Kevin MacDonald, nor would Wax for exactly the same reasons.
One reason for my suspicions is that last year I somehow got added to an email distribution list that Wax was sending out to about a hundred or so of her friends and allies, mostly academics and journalists, and from what I remember she and all the others were ranting and raving about American “antisemitism” in ways that even the ADL might find embarrassing.
Don’t forget that Rabbi Kahane got his start fighting with the blacks in New York City, so perhaps Langdon might consider him an ideological ally. But I doubt that Kahane and his friends wouldt return the favor, and instead they’d be much more likely to try to assassinate anyone connected with Langdon’s Occidental Observer website.
I have pointed out something similar in reference to Lawrence Auster.
https://www.unz.com/article/fingernails-and-fascism-the-nastiness-and-noxiousness-of-jewish-ethnocentrism/#comment-6293360
Aside from this, it’s not very reasonable to compare the beauty of two women based on photos in which the contestants have differing ages. Here are some photos of Ruth Bader when she was young:
https://time.com/3714172/ruth-bader-ginsburg-young-photos/
Ron – I was first exposed to all the JQ hype in a big way (which turns out to be much more than just hype) way back in around 2013 or so (if I recall that date correctly) at a now long defunct website called Chateau Heartiste, of all places (a site about man/woman attraction dynamics, from the perspective of a womanizer-player [in Washington, D.C., from what I could gather, but he himself never said he was stationed there] well versed in evolutionary psychology themes). That is where I learned about Kevin MacDonald’s take, which led me to E.O. Wilson’s take on the very likely existence of group selection for the human species (a controversial narrow topic), that otherwise helped substantiate what otherwise appeared to be these rather bizarre claims of Kevin MacDonald about the Jews.
All this does inevitably lead to the kinds of claims made by an Edward Dutton, about higher mutational loads, all round, for humans.
OK, …. perhaps the synergy of the various takes of Kevin MacDonald vis-a-vis E.O. Wilson vis-a-vis Edward Dutton, has much warrant, is the way to look at it I think, as an exploration (i.e. – the truth about who I really am, as a human, is the most important deeply profound question of all, for each of us). Let’s embrace who we truly are for starters, type thing.
From the imagined super-zoomed-out so-called God’s-eye perspective, one can entertain the tension between the magnificent flowering of humanity (8 billion!) occurring in concert with the civilization-spun higher mutational load. What a stupendous point/counterpoint, that – eh?
The trick here is to love oneself as well as one’s brothers and sisters. Warts and all. To me, the Jewish collective, compared to others, is more-so crazy, more-so bold, more-so in possession of great chutzpah, more-so intelligent, … and most importantly, more-so suffering from deep self-inflicted psychic wounds around ‘unspoken but believed deficiency’. The arrogant are that way (arrogant) for a reason, is what I am saying. It’s a weakness, not a strength. It’s a covert response (a cover) upon feelings of deficiency.
Jews very much tend towards arrogance. Way back when now, the now long defunct Chateau Heartiste maintained that this ‘feeling of deficiency’ (what some may describe as ‘jealousy’), for the Jewish collective, was about their self-perceived facial ugliness, and otherwise goofy bodily mannerisms. Now, …. we should be a bit careful here, because within Jewry, it seems the more orthodox religious types, and their recent secular spawn, might be skewing things that way, for the entire collective (i.e. – to get my drift, imagine the Hasidics are the sweetspot of what I am referring to here). We should not lose sight of the fact that there are also many exceptionally beautiful Jewish people, too.
OK, …. I hope you are perceiving my overall message here, then, in this comment, which is this Coles Notes: The Jews have always played an oversized part, of how we got to here (civilization with it’s confounding mix of brilliance and anti-brilliance). I love myself. I love humanity. So of course, I love the Jews. But the Jews don’t sufficiently love themselves, which is The Problem.
Take Hasidics for instance. Some pretty goofy countenances there, some would say. And mannerism too, some would say. But they are the main keepers and purveyors of the western occult tradition, which isn’t a nothingburger – right? So I can’t help but like these guys (Hasidics) to some degree. It’s the intensity they possess.
Look at it this way: Woody Allen is a western treasure. It’s true. Same goes for the Coen Brothers. We can’t do without this contra-commentary, by the likes of a Woody Allen or the Coen Brothers (all 3 very sensitive people). The Jews are massively lovable. Its seems like they don’t know that, or something, and then the reaction spiral has then fucked everything up.
I know I have gone on an on about ontological humility. But that really is the key insight (towards much better resolution, upon the universe’s dictate that we must genuinely love ourselves, warts and all, to prevail in even a small way, … and as well, the universal dictate is that we must try to prevail). Once one gleans ontological humility, then it becomes completely obvious that one’s allegiance should be with humanity.
You’re absolutely correct. I’d never realized that Ruth Bader was so nice-looking when she was young.
Ruth B. Ginsburg a “tchotchke”‽ Wow!
.
.
.
Aesthetics and Ethics = two peas in a pod.
What’s deemed ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ is due to Evolution. Hence, cannot be objective;
What’s deemed ‘pretty’ and ‘ugly’ is due to Evolution, as well.¹ Hence, cannot be objective.
Nihilism is all there is.
(I could be wrong, for sure. I’d love to, personally.)
1. Facial/Body symmetry, youth etc.
I’m a frequent reader of the Observer, but I can’t say I much care for any of their contributors except MacDonald and Dutton. I think we need to be able to identify patterns and tendencies without making them into right/wrong or good/bad issues. Do Blacks, on average, have lower IQs than Whites? Sadly, yes, and it explains the sad state of Black-run polities. Though I’ve met a number of very smart Blacks and I’ve always been willing to return any kindness and friendship with the same. Ditto for Jews, whom I’ve found much easier to relate to. Still, I suspect MacDonald is right about heritability of mental illness. The intense Jewish drive and their high average IQ combined with a tendency to paranoia have really helped mess up our society. We Whites don’t need to reject people out of hand for their tendencies but need to be wary of them and stop blaming ourselves. That’s one of OUR demons. Every race has its problems, such as Native Americans and their susceptibility to alcohol, which is one of the few society allows us to recognize. These are facts of life, that’s all.
Jewish women tend to have an odd transformation though.
Highly sexualised vampy teenage years then the increasingly angry political 20s. Bloom comes off the Rose, or shall we say Ruth early on. White women without the Semitic admixture last much longer with good looks with a better bone structure. Hitting the wall all the same though just at a different time. Black women can maintain a sort of skin glow if they don’t get fat and don’t get liver spots and skin tags. Well preserved like Halley Berry.
It’s a tricky subject.
I don’t think I ever heard of Felicity Jones before this moment, but I don’t like to see her being picked on. For literal decades, I have been scouting for the perfect actress to play the role of the whiny, pouty,
vapid, self-absorbed, self-pitying Lenina Crowne from Huxley’s Brave New World. Jones will do. Admittedly, she’s a little too cupcakey for the role, but better that than someone who looks assertive, self-confident and liberated.
If Lenina was what passed for a Beta Plus around there, that Brave New World was not a very impressive place. What struck me most about Brave New World after a recent reading was the utter mediocrity of everyone. The Alphas, supposedly the top group, were (though marginally capable) utter trash. Lenina herself existed soley for the purpose of being an available piece of a** for the local Alphas. That she had a job was only incidental. She did something that was functional, but it was still just cover.
Huxley identified five castes divided by mental ability, the Alphas, Betas, Gammas, Deltas and Epsilons. Huxley’s characters all were either Alphas or Betas. He said nothing about the Gammas, who were the working class. The Deltas and Epsilons were mentally limited engineered bilogical creations. No filmmaker or aubaequent writer has ever tried to expand on Huxley’s concept and depict the full spectrum of life in this imagined society. These amorous contacts between members of the different castes would have figured very large in this expanded story, as they did indeed in Huxley’s original novel.
If I recall from my art class correctly, the classical aesthetic ideal was: Uniformity without monotony, variety without chaos. Young Ruth, alas, was too monotonous, and lacked variety. She was, generously, midpack. First-tier is vanishingly rare for Jewish girls. Here, to illustrate the contrast, is an example of variety, uniform and NOT monotonous.
https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftse3.mm.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DOIP.KKL3sx_cdtXYKLOqke5-gAHaJ5%26pid%3DApi&f=1&ipt=ed6326652878def8c2f00c876595e7af3d0355c9f0f20ae32a9dad888c1d3065&ipo=images
“Point and sputter” is the term that Steve uses.
Soon:
https://www.theguardian.com/profile/wilson-jason
https://wordynerdbird.com/2021/02/07/easily-confused-words-sputter-vs-splutter/
One of the interesting things about jewish selective inbreeding was the fact that their head Rabbi had the power of life and death in their ghettos – and to be clear they weren’t forced into ghettos but enforced their own separation to keep their own families tightly knit, tightly bred and controlled – as well as to hide practices most unsavory
In fact one important reason they loathe Russians is because a Tsar (can’t be bothered to look up which one @ 3AM) forbade such life & death powers and executions which were routinely carried out for crimes such as telling the goyim anything about judaic ways or even dating outside the race.
Jewish women unfortunate to date or perhaps show an interest in a goy would often be caged or placed in a pit where she could expire from exposure / dehydration. This provided a lesson to the ghetto that could be observed for many weeks as the victim slowly expired.
Really it’s no surprise they dominate as their racial cohesion and 2000 years of selection for psychopathy and dissembling mendaciousness is unstoppable when coupled with their willing shabbos goy
I must agree with you on that, Mr Unz.
But that was likely before she was under the complete grip of Zionism and feminism. Maleficent ideas warp the soul, that is certainly true. But often they warp the countenance as well.
Here is a photo of a younger Victoria Nuland.
Unz, this is one of the dumbest articles you’ve posted on Unz. There are lots of attractive Jews. For example, here is perhaps the best looking Hollywood actress in modern history, Scarlett Johansson, crying about her Polish Jewish heritage….
And here is a random Wikimedia image of a random similar-looking Jewish girl…
“Girls of the IDF” is a well-known meme for good reason. Even Ruth Bader Ginsberg was not so ugly as a young woman. It’s really her aging that affected her punim.
This topic is indeed a bit ‘nasty’ (insulting) but its roughness be should forgiven. Why? An amorphous but unified collection of ‘influential’ American Jews (and the institutions they control) all richly deserve it.
After all, organized Jewry is on a proud, defiant, well-funded,and lethal rampage.
Shall we count the causalities?
It’s drifted into the tens of millions.
Palestine, Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Iraq, Libya, Iran, Fascist Italy, Germany (twice), Tsarist Russia and the numerous smaller states which were swallowed up following the (((communist revolution.))) So let the insults fly. It beats bullets.
Seen another way, those glorious, downtrodden, and brilliant Hebrews have much to be ashamed of. But are they? Not one bit.
As we speak, Jewish pride, unity and power can be directly connected to the systematic blacklisting of scores of idealistic, young American students (at many of America’s top colleges) who dared to protest against Israel’s ongoing genocide against indigenous gentiles there. But these idealistic young Americans were crushed by the Khazarian mob. And our vaunted MSM played a pivotal role, routinely censoring political discourse as well as deliberately distorting some of the fundamental issues at play.
For instance, our Zionist-leaning MSM routinely describes the ongoing was in Gaza as between ‘Israel and Hamas’ but its actually just another chapter in the intermittent war between
‘Jews and gentiles’. It’s endless. At the very least, the MSM should call it a war between ‘Israel and Palestine’ or between ‘Hamas and the IDF’. Balance please.
So do be careful who you root for, America.
As for faltering Free Speech rights at America’s top colleges, even the few administrators there who did support the ‘Right of non-violent protest’ were purged in order to “protect Jewish students” from hate speech blah blah blah. It’s the same old kosher malarkey.
Meanwhile, as Israeli missiles fly, the vast majority of conformist ‘normies’ pretend not to notice Jewish power in Washington while most of the MAGA crowd couldn’t care less one way or another. USA! USA! USA!
Is there a term for this brand of stupidity?
American memory has been captured, reprogrammed, and edited for simplicity.
Comments are Closed.
Chose this moniker 25 or so years ago to express disdain for teachers at NY State University, many of whom were Jewz. In fact they were problematical even into high school. Funny the word ‘nasty’ used in reference to them seems universal, appropriate, and now, vindicating. Only one of dozens of them seemed to me conscientious and competent.
The rest were naz-T fkrs and fkettes.
Care to expound? I be interested in those reasons.
Yes, I agree mostly (we are all humans, and we all have similar issues, that come out differently, due to culture and such). The Jewish collective seems to have massive issues around un-analyzed arrogance. The tendency is to kneejerk towards thinking the arrogance is warranted because of the “intense Jewish drive and their high average IQ”. No. Does not compute: Show me the money. How have these cognitive attributes led to any assurance (other than wishful thinking) that other peoples’ views can be perennially discounted?
Personally, I don’t find it easy to relate to Jews unless they are Jews trying to relate to goy western culture (Coen Brothers, Woody Allen). Otherwise, the basic Jewish idea is the Judaic, … and I am pretty sure the Judaic is pretty much complete malarkey (i.e. – the Judaic stance as is filled with misplaced arrogance). I don’t like that. Weirdly victorious, supposed victims, turned victimizers, emerges as the story of the Judaic. The Judaic religion is a celebration of cluster-B-type psychopathology. We all have these tendencies that require mature self-management. At the moment, the Jewish collective is the one massively suffering under this tendency, though, and they have not even gone to step one to reform their average wrongheaded spiritual stance, as is based on the massive ontological conciet (the worst sin of all) as sponsored by the Judaic. The Judaic tends to turn out arrogant bastards by the bushel-full.
I don’t think that Jews are against beauty b/c they are themselves unattractive. As other commenters have noted, there are physically attractive people among Jews, both male and female. I think that Jews hate beauty b/c they are incapable of creating beauty, and I think that they are incapable of creating beauty because Judaism is a mental prison. Sectarian thought and creation of beauty are incompatible. However, when Jews free themselves from the Judaic mental prison, they can do beautiful things, Camille Pissarro comes to mind.
She looks very thoughtful in that photograph. Intelligence, at least IMO, is always attractive. The “Lauren Bacall” hairstyle helps, as well. Her later penchant for “pulled back tight” could make Rita Hayworth look ugly. Well, almost. 🙂
Lizzy Caplan is quite a looker
Video Link
Video Link
Biggest howler is Rachel Weisz as Deobrah Lipstadt in DENIAL.
Weisz is no beauty but attractive.
Lipstadt is gross.
Since those are places i visited and visit too, you might enjoy Warstrike and JFG tonight.
Both on Odysee.
There are. I went to high school with many of them.
But there is a subset of Jewishness that is goofily ugly in a space alienlike way.
Like Woody Allen and Carolyn Ellison. They are like mutants.
Same with the Chinese. The ugly ones are really really ugly.
And then there is the Negression to the Mean.
Video Link
Video Link
Correct me if I am wrong – but isn’t beauty in the eye of the beholder? Settle down guys. Peace.
In the hit 1997 movie Good Will Hunting, Matt Damon’s love interest was Minnie Driver.
There probably isn’t a Jew alive who didn’t recognize Minnie Driver as Jewish, and framed the movie relationship as a love affair between a dark, cosmopolitan Jew and a blond Goy, even if this was never stated.
Among Gentile audiences, I’d guess very few thought of that angle, which is to say Jews and European White Gentiles have very different takes on our mutual interactions, theirs being tribal long before we take that leap.
Robert Weinstein and his wife Anne.
“There are lots of attractive Jews.”
And there are lots of intelligent blacks, tall Japanese, short Dutchmen, literate Gypsies, and people called Chris who can understand statistics.
Jews have bought their way into the white/European genetic makeup since the times of The Romans/Byzantines, in one way or another. Thank God for the ghettos, Ghetti in Italian. 😊
PS. I was walking down the street of my ‘bucolic’ suburban abode one Sunday morning and encountered a pick-up/drop-off point at the abandoned parking lot that used to house my supermarket. It was some Joo-ish school group with most of the men wearing small hats, lol, yamakas (yarmulke). I purposely walked thru the parking lot because, hey it’s my town, but I smartly didn’t shout “From the river to the sea Palestine will be free”. 😄 I didn’t want to be accosted by some testosterone peaking 18-year-olds or their fathers or even some rough yentas. 😆
I noticed that many of these people were whiter than me! A lot of blonds and even red heads. One red haired girl appeared stunning. Maybe it’s just because I like red heads, but she made me look twice. Many of these orthodox yids had to have a lot of Nordic blood in them, obviously, which proves my pernt above.
Christ, the stupidity…
The facial characteristics these morons consider ‘ugly’ is simply a function of Middle Eastern ancestry. Nothing more, nothing less.
‘There probably isn’t a Jew alive who didn’t recognize Minnie Driver as Jewish, and framed the movie relationship as a love affair between a dark, cosmopolitan Jew and a blond Goy, even if this was never stated.’
Minnie Driver is supposedly English Scottish and Irish
Jewish girls are quite pretty when they are young. However, the old saying goes. When the good woman casts her lot with the wicked, her goodness is forfeit and so are her looks and appearance.
These women fall into a crowd where all the negative aspects of the human being congregate. Naked greed, cheating, and lying is balanced by the fear of losing and being found out. Hence their thoughts and actions are reflected on their faces. That is why I think, these pretty women end up with cold watchful eyes and hard faces. There is no kindness reflected on the countenance. The distorted and twisted interior is exposed on the face and body.
These ladies are usually laconic and choose their words carefully. The game is to say what they think the other person wants to hear, what will benefit them personally and what cannot come back to haunt them. One does not feel the weight of their words or intellectual thinking. The sophisticated would call it hogwash, the deplorables refer to it as bullshit. On the other hand they watch and listen carefully to non-Jew’s words and actions to see if and how they can personally benefit.
Finally, the body odor. When I travel out of LaGuardia, I stay away from the boarding gate until the very last moment. At the gate, one will usually find a gaggle of Jews, well dressed in their garb. They look very prosperous but smell as stink as hell. From time to time one will encounter a Jewish woman, well dressed and all but who smells of stale pee and rotting cheese. Sitting next to any of these people on a flight is sheer torture. One struggles to maintain composure amid the reek of stale sweat and other sour smells. After my first such experience a handkerchief and Aqua Velva became my best friends.
As for being “shrewd” this is a matter of time and circumstance. After being kicked out of over 100 countries, their shrewdness comes into question. For further confirmation one need only look at the impossible situation Israel has dug itself into right now. Where Jew wealth is concerned this is provided by non-Jews who rush to buy their goods and services. If for example, everyone stopped paying to see their movie trash, they whole industry would collapse.
And where solidarity is concerned this is another myth. Solidarity cannot exist where constant and unrestrained greed is present. Two Jews negotiating a deal will squabble endlessly for the advantage and thus “a bigger share”. Many recognize this and tend to hire relatives and close friends to mitigate the usual negative behaviour. Alas, many a Jew has found that the family and long time friend he trusted will shaft him when money is involved.
This has been my experience with these people. Life must be sheer misery and the spirit and soul a living hell, to be worth $B100 and still want more. One look at many of these characters and the discerning can see the story of their mentality emblazoned on their faces.
As with the women so with the men.
There’s lots of attractive Jews; they’re typically Non-Ashkenazi.
Ashkenazi Jews, Greeks, Turks, all have those features. Ashkenazi have added negative of close blood lines due to isolation.
Sephardic are oftentimes beautiful like Natalie Portman.
Non-Jewish whites get bad looking as they age. Both white males and females lose there looks quickly. Older people in Asia, Middle East and Africa age better.
In the end none of this matters. It’s the character that matters most. Physically unattractive people become average or better when they shine from inside. Have you ever known a beautiful person on outside but their sociopathy made them ugly?
I would imagine for two reasons.
First, from Matthew 7: And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother’s eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
Second, although inviting someone to address race differences is somewhat controversial, it’s nothing compared to a speaker addressing the JQ. The jews control academia.
For Lipstadt, who is a U.S. ambassador, to joke about exploding pagers in that recent Israeli-American Council hosted event, was so vile.
https://www.turkiyetoday.com/world/us-antisemitism-envoy-faces-backlash-over-remarks-on-lebanon-pager-attacks-56136/
Btw, Lipstadt has the “deicidal face” which Brother Nathanael calls the unattractive aging Jewish visage.
I was actually thinking the exact opposite. Facial beauty in particular follows mathematical and geometrical proportions (i.e, the golden ratio). Strikes me that the best scientific proof for his somewhat dubious hypothesis is to analyze faces through such an algorithm, varied by race.
The greatest refutation to this piece is the very fact that, even in these replies, we debate about who is and who isn’t a jew. I’m guessing that this was a central reason why the Nazis forced jews to wear the star – they couldn’t tell who was what either. We don’t have this struggle with the other races. Consequently, seems a slap in the face to the whites to say that jews, who are usually visually white, are ugly.
“But I doubt that Kahane and his friends wouldt return the favor, and instead they’d be much more likely to try to assassinate anyone connected with Langdon’s Occidental Observer website.”
That statement is dripping of juglyness to the hilt. I doubt very much that Tobias Langdon would want approbation from any Jew let alone from Krazy Kahane.
Decades of hateful thought have turned RBG into a Lizard-Queen, obviously.
The only reason “leftists” don’t have to use arguments, but rather just “point and splutter” to take down an opponent, is because a virulent cancer has metastasized all throughout the West: the Jew. The Jew itself is a cancer and it forms tumors and colonizes every aspect of society — politics, academia, media — the worst aspect of which is its tendency to attack the most vital organ: the brain. Unfortunately, the mind of Western man has become the mind of the Jew.
Now, if the “leftists” have targeted the Jew Nathan Cofnas for being a Nazi, then Cofnas has only his Jew brethren to blame: the Jews themselves infected leftist brains with this cancerous ideology, and it has spread to such a degree that no one is safe from its vicious attacks, not even Jews. The Jews invent these concept-weapons — “Nazi”, “racist” — and hand them over to the Golem mob to use against any thought-criminals, some of whom may be Jews themselves. No one is safe.
And so it is that it is basically no use reading or watching 99% of what is produced today because none of it has to do with reality: almost everything we see and hear is a farce, a Jew-created inverted reality. We have reached Peak Jew. This is why it is important to go back to older texts, elaborated before the Jew cancer had completely taken over and infected our societies. Here is a quote from long ago, on the topic of Jewish Ugliness as discussed in the article:
That photo of rbg at 22 (looks like an early photoshop or glamorshot) looks nothing like the pic of her at 16 or the later ones. Maybe at 2a when the bar is closing, a 12pker.
There is something specific to Jews that makes it seem like their snouts and foreheads expand with age. Don’t know if either actually do get bigger. Regardless, it’s not a pretty facial look. Perhaps it an identifying curse due to their historical leading role in the torturous death of Jesus.
That’s the Scandinavian part of her though.
No, Jews wore identification so that when you realized you were scammed that you knew who was doing it.
That is Scarlett Johanson after her nosejob.
Interesting. I. Shahak, in his Jewish History, Jewish Religion, says that the first recorded use of the term “anti-Semitism” is in a letter sent by a Polish rabbi to his fellows, complaining about how Napoleon, who supposedly “emancipated” the Jews, was robbing the rabbis of them long-established “right” to execute anyone in their congregations who dared to disagree with the rabbi.
I suppose the rabbis preferred their self-imposed ghettos, where they ruled the roost, while the more secular Jews welcomed/demanded “emancipation” so as to make some money, and acquire some real power.
We see this today when we are told about supposedly “anti-Zionist” Jews, who actually are Jews who are so super-Orthodox that they wait for the Messiah to come while striving to fulfill the Law, rather than blasphemously try speed him up by establishing Israel in the here and now. Both, however, have the same goal: enslave the goyim.
One way or another, with Jews you lose.
Did you know Rita Hayworth was originally Mexican (Margarita Carmen Cansino) and one of her early handlers gave her an extensive makeover including a nose job and hairline lift. Hollywood is totally fake and gay.
Actually, it’s the nose and ears, which, being cartilage, do not suffer from the drying out of the skin that happens with age. Thus, comparing young/old faces, you can clearly see Jewish faces becoming more bat-like or reptilian: big noses become bigger, big ears stick out more. Ironically, this is because they are actually not changing at all. It’s all relative, as the kids say.
This seems to happen less to the Negro, hence fewer if any wrinkles as they age, leading to the expression “Black don’t crack.”
So, Jews become bats, Whites become wrinkled up crab apples, and Negro stay smooth, but still look like Negros. And some people believe in a just God!
Does it occur to anyone posting photos of their favorite Jewish starlets that these women only appear in heavily controlled situations, either when filmed or at events, where everything is designed to make them appear as good as possible? And, of course, plenty of plastic surgery. And that the people controlling Hollywood and thus these techniques are mostly Jews?
This is one reason celebrities are so paranoid about controlling their image. For a non-Jewish example, Cher had front teeth that slightly overlapped; at just the right/wrong angle, one tooth overshadowed another and she would look like she was missing the other tooth. Until she had enough money to have them fixed, she quickly learned that she had to prevent random people from taking photos.
That’s a Semite! You’re being anti-Semitic.
This low-budget film was a major hit. Must have been due to nostalgia for the Yiddish Alps summer resorts? 🤣
When I was younger I looked like Patrick Swayze’s identical twin (though much younger). My Jewish friend’s mother told him that I were to go to her ‘girl’s night out’, her middle-aged Jewish women friends would be all over me. 🤣
‘That is Scarlett Johanson after her nosejob.’ — Gott ist mit Unz
Oy vey! We’ve been had.
Woody Allen a western treasure??
You’ve got to be kidding.
I never found anything Woody Allen produced as being anything more than juvenile claptrap, not worthy of merit and merely wasting of valuable time.
Woody Allen is a scumbag jew child molester, marrying his adopted daughter.
One cannot forget Roman Polansky, another jew who raped and sodomized a 13-year-old girl and escaped to Europe to avoid prosecution.
Why was Polansky never extradited to the USA to face trial? Oops, I forgot, he’s a JEW who can do whatever he wants to the “goyim”.
Your jew-love is disgusting.
Thanks for the info.
‘JFG Tonight’? That be Jean-François Gariépy. Didn’t know he had that channel. I did come across Gariepy over at Vox Day’s website, when Beale (Vox Day) tried to have a debate with Gariepy, years ago now, over Beale’s illusion that there is no way in the world that chimpanzees and humans have a common ancestor, for instance, because the observed accrued genetic differences didn’t have enough time to accrue. Beale was extremely dumb in that debate, and then subsequently refused to see the errors in his calcs, and since that was the 3rd time Beale had already gone extremely dumb-bonkers on different issues, upon which I had confronted him each time within the comments, … well that was the end of the end, for commenting for me, there (kicked to the curb in extremely childish ways, …. Beale used to edit the comment stream of people he didn’t like, on the fly – crazy stuff, but oh so common). The earlier confrontations were about his inaccurate and illogical definition of the alt-right, and then later about his lack of savvy around handling the Open Theism concept as promoted by the likes of Baptist theologian Greg Boyd.
Beale is a moron. There are alot of internet so-called geniuses (guys filled with misplaced arrogance) all over the internet, who are actually morons. People who have good minds, and good IQ, but are still morons (because they don’t know what they don’t know, and don’t try to find out, … pretty much a certain definition of ‘arrogant’). Sad.
I read somewhere they went even so far as to break their girls legs so they wouldn’t run away.
Exactly that JF.
Tweets by JFGariepy
Warstrike is with Unz contributor Eric Striker.
In my opinion the best show on the internet rn.
But very long episodes.
sidenote – I wonder where my post about Gal Gadot went …
“There are lots of attractive Jews.”
Scarlett Johannson is in fact half Danish/Swedish through her father Karsten Olaf Johansson and half Polish/Russian Jewish through her mother Melanie Sloan. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scarlett_Johansson
So not a really good example for your proposition.
it went under another article – lol
https://www.unz.com/article/defending-humanity/#comment-6785444
Since it fits here even better.
Gal Gadot is one of the most disgusting people that ever walked this earth.
This is the Mall of America Attack.
Video Link
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2019/11/23/boy-thrown-third-floor-mall-america-returns-school-says-he-was-caught-by-angels/
And this is Gal Gadot race switching the same attack in Wonder Woman 1984.
Video Link
And this is Gal Gadot singing Imagine with other disgusting people.
Video Link
A dance instructor of the most moral army in the world.
I don’t see the point of this article, cobble together a few photos of ugly Jews and tell us that it’s evidence of their intrinsic evil. Like you can’t apply the same exercise to every other ethnic group under the sun.
If we want to identify the true evil in this world, then let’s expose the Synagogue of Satan, that would be more useful. And BTW does he not appear as an angel of light. Yes, their are many drop dead gorgeous practitioners of evil floating around too, it takes a tad more effort to identify them.
Making fun of a person’s appearance is childish. There are good-looking and ugly people in every group. It is the religion and culture of Jews that is the proper target for criticism, not their facial features.
While Allen may be a scumbag, there is no need to make stuff up about him. The child molestation allegation was judged to be something Mia made up after she found out that Woody had been banging a twenty something girl that Farrow and her ex-husband Andre had purchased from Korea.
Farrow is alleged to have coaxed another young girl she purchased into saying that Woody touched her in an inappropriate manner. But there were no witnesses, and evidently the girl’s confession was said to be inconsistent and appeared coached.
Farrow herself was accused by a couple of ‘her kids’ of abuse, so the entire ‘family’ (most of whom were purchased from overseas) was a cluster fuck.
Now, although Woody Allen might not be someone that anyone would want to emulate, the molestation allegation was an ‘angry woman’ thing, and not part of reality. Do not underestimate the spitefulness of a spurned and abandoned wife.
Lastly, the ‘adopted’ daughter of Previn and Farrow (the one purchased from Korea and the girl Woody married) was, as far as I know, never legally adopted by Woody.
In my wife’s college days, she had a Mexican professor in a class ranting about racism and citing as an example the practice of Jews getting nose jobs. How many Jewish people have gotten nose jobs to hide their Jewishness he asked the class rhetorically. A female student replied: “Not enough!” He replied “That’s anti-Semitism!” She replied; “I’m Jewish!”
And all this time I’ve been thinking every Hollywood actor and t.v. star was a total jew. They all sound and act that way.
Thank you for your response. It is appreciated.
However, I must stand my ground on Woody Allen.
He is a prime example of jewish amorality in action. He is doing what jews do. Gentile women are considered to be shiksas, free to be abused by the jews.
The whole Hollywood crowd is a diseased jew-run temple that should be destroyed.
Woody Allen is a part of the system…
I still see nothing esoteric or funny about his movies…
Just my opinion…
Regards,
Since you largely misremember it, you may try re-reading Huxley’s novel.
This is all, actually quite funny-
In this new, kinder, softer, more gentle era of “fat acceptance”, and anti-racism, and a hundred other bullshit but supposedly “real” new movements, “don’t judge a book by it’s cover”, people are STILL pretty hung up about looks, their looks!
Black women tend to get super fat. It’s just reality, just like them having big butts.
Mexican girls can be gorgeous, until about 14-16, then they usually get very fat and plump too.
A lot of German women can have a very stern, almost mean look.
But the jews… everyone on the planet knows the stereotypical jewish aesthetic, but don’t you dare mention it! “Better listen up, maybe he’ll say blessed are the big noses” (Life of Brian)
Sure, they can run the world, own the banks, rule the media, found and run Hollywood, but don’t mention the fact that many have big noses!
Why?
Because nobody is allowed to criticize jews for anything! Well, except other jews, sometimes, like the entire show Seinfeld. There they were allowed to talk about almost every jewish stereotype- his uncle that thought every sleight was because of anti-semitism, his dad using a calculator to figure a tip down to the penny, George’s parents, yelling at each other 24/7, or the overbearing jewish mom’s lamenting and deriding their sons’.
Even got into “Shiks-appeal”. “Elaine, did you know that jewish rabbis can marry?” They spoofed “becoming a man” at their bar mitzvah’s. Jerry was a passionate germ-a-phobe, who dated almost exclusively gentile women, and even made out during Schindler’s List!
However, nobody else can do any of that shit, or the jews will call you a Hitler, and try to destroy you.
She was the “sister” of the other “children”, so Daddy’s screwing our sister. How is that in any way acceptable because he didn’t adopt her. Straight up freak show depravity. Way overated movies too.
Holy christ was that an entertaining read……
On one hand…
“The idealized image is presented” on behalf of the favored few.
…on the other hand…
…a demonized image is conferred on the soon-to-be isolated, disenfranchised target.
Narcissistic personality disorder in a nutshell.
Arrogance, individual and group, arises from an identical source, self-hatred.
(((They))) literally and figuratively cannot stand to live with themselves or with each other.
That IS the science of the 20th century’s greatest Jewish minds in psychology and psychiatry.
I for one would never argue with them.
Let them own it.
Oh, by the way, Scott Rittler the creeper is still a jerk like P Diddy The Diddler.
Picture of Menachem Begin not the equally evil Ruth Ginsburg.
Commenting on a person’s looks OK if person evil.
RBG is fair game.
5ds
Wow! This crowd is really worked up over Jewish punims. It makes me wonder. Langdon, not surprisingly, see the Aryan archetype as the prime example of ultimate beauty (blonde, blue eyed, etc) Would he say that Sophia Loren, or Catherine Zeta Jones fall into the less than department because they are not blonde, blue eyed?
I always thought Naomi Wolf was a very beautiful woman*. And even though she was super-intelligent (Yale, Ph.D., Oxford) she was never obnoxious and always pleasant with a soothing voice.
*And I’m not alone in that assessment. I always thought Harold Bloom was gay until I read he sexually harassed Wolf while she was a student of his at Yale. Or maybe Wolf’s beauty just turned him straight. 🤣
Ridiculous, incoherent, absurdist nonsense. It’s not even clear who Nathan Cofnas is or why anyone should give a shit about what he says or thinks. The author has a shotgun loaded with buckshot and fires it off at random; it’s not surprising he hits something, somewhere. Rather like Dick Cheney on a duck hunt.
Hmmm, methinks there is a school of thought that promulgates the idea that an aged face reflects the life lived.
That is, a beautiful child will gain an ugly visage in advanced age because it lived a life of ugly thoughts and deeds, and a homely child may gain a pleasant face because of good and happy thoughts and deeds.
An interesting conjecture I would think.
Agree, beyond the dumbest article. It is not even written in readable English. I guess as you can see Ron’s readership has really fallen way off. He has to resuscitate old articles on 9/11 or Nazi -Jew stuff from 2019 to stoke comments. New articles barely brake 200 comments. Proof he just posted a new (Oy vey) Jews did 9/11 The like 100th article on the subject. It always brings out the crazies who say there were no planes, no dead people in the planes etc.
Hey Ron time to bring out a new Anne Frank article or better yet your favorite of favorite Jew hatting piece on Leo Frank. Ha! Ha!. Don’t tell Paul McCartney about Jewish girls being ugly. He married two of them.
Oh and Lauren Bacall was Jewish. And if you were to ask me and most people, no one is uglier than
Kevin McDonald.
‘a Polish rabbi to his fellows, complaining about how Napoleon, who supposedly “emancipated” the Jews, was robbing the rabbis of them long-established “right” to execute anyone in their congregations who dared to disagree with the rabbi.’
For the same reason they hated the tzar. Emancipation was a real threat to rabbinical power. First you mix freely with the Goyim then you may start imitating them and may even end up marrying them…
When they wail about the Jews being in danger of disappearing they don’t mean the Jews as people but the judaic ideology. Sporadic DNA enrichment through occasional pogroms was tolerable; after all, the offspring born by the Jewish women shtumped by the Russian/Khazaks were still Jews by virtue of the mitochondrial criterion. And the kids did not look too bad: blonde and with broad Slavic faces like Scarlett Johansson. But an emancipated Jew deliberately marrying a shiksa is another matter. No conversion makes her totally acceptable and the kids, even de-prepuced and bar mitzvahed, are still silently thought of as “mamzerim” (bastards from a prohibited relation), a condition that Michael Douglas. struggled to overcome all his life.
The souls of NYT Jews are ugly
As Vox Day is wont to say, and is likely true in this case: You’re not tall enough for this ride. I’m not either when it comes to math, but given the choice, I’ll trust Vox’s math over yours, random internet guy.
Much of Evo is Just So Stories and ‘it could conceivably happened this way so THIS IS CORRECT’…..which sort of very soft points tends to collapse when it runs into actual math and facts.
I find Dr. Kevin McDonalds Group Development Psychology highly accurate..Look at Hollywood Business.. What are the chances of a Gentile young recent college graduate to break into big Hollywood inner circle..? vrs a young JEWISH one, that since birth had been groomed to join his elite close tribe/group.?? What are the chances of a gentile businessman to break into the Diamond trading business global markets?? Real State in NYC..??probably NONE.. In my country ONE jew owns 90% of the TV stations/Radios/Print media..why? because the other global jews would NOT trade with a gentile owners. Its a close market for gentiles.. antigentilism? racism? PD the jews are killing thousands of Palstinains who cares about their looks??
I don’t think the physical unattractiveness of Jews is a very important topic or worth much comment.
Seeing mention that the pretty Felicity Jones played Ginsburg reminded me that they cast the attractive Rachel Weisz (who’s actually Jewish) to play the obnoxious horse-faced Jew Deborah Lipstadt in the film Denial.
Perhaps the most notorious example of this kind of character assassination masquerading as journalism was the way Amy Harmon of the NYT went after Nobel winner Dr James Watson because of his casually expressed views on race and intelligence — this gave rise to a new verb ‘to watson’ someone: so-and-so was watsoned.
Steve Hsu was another victim of leftist mob outrage for concluding nature was a lot more important than nurture — he ultimately resigned his academic VP position at Michigan State — he’s still a professor of physics there, and pursuing his nature work via polygenic embryo scoring.
And it will never stop being funny that Sabrina Rubin Erdely still has a Twitter/X account which she used at the time to promote her notoriously bogus rape story in Rolling Stone, but hasn’t posted since her hoax was exposed.
You beat me to it. Obviously TL’s article touched a nerve.
Kevin MacDonald — 2022:
Kevin MacDonald — “The Default Hypothesis Fails to Explain Jewish Influence”:
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2022/01/01/the-default-hypothesis-fails-to-explain-jewish-influence/
The only reason half wit jews like “nathan cofnas” get any kind of airtime and attention is that other jews in powerful places promote them, and ignore/silence/censor/de-boost more intelligent non jews.
Perfect example here…
The non jew Jake Shields is PREVENTED from interviewing Nick Fuentes on youtube.
HOWEVER the jews of youtube ALLOW other jews to interview Nick Fuentes on youtube.
I’m so tired of these people and their endless fucking of everyone else in favor of their own. If you jews are so great….let the masses decide who/what they like best. Stop discriminating against non jews all the friggin time.
An expression from Ancient Greece sums up TL’s article, and some of the comments, rather nicely: Ugly Face – Ugly Soul
Naturally, that expression could apply to any part of the world, past or present.
In fact, it was said to have been used on Socrates, to his face. But it definitely fits the theme of this article. To his credit, Socrates didn’t deny it. He had what Orwell once referred to as the power of facing unpleasant facts.
Obviously, it’s a power that a number of commenters responding to this article do not have. These unfortunates need to make others pay for what they can’t face about themselves. They’re incapable of grasping the fact that unattractive people can make themselves attractive by simply accepting themselves as they are, since self-acceptance will always be an attractive quality.
They best way to turn an unattractive quality into an attractive person is self-acceptance. Just as the best way to turn an unattractive quality into an ugly person is self-pity.
In fact, self-pity can even turn a very attractive person into an ugly soul. In any event, those Greeks sure knew what they were talking about.
Jews and blacks have superiority/inferiority complex.
Jews believe themselves to be intellectually superior and stronger-willed, and that may well be true. They see whites as essentially shallow and less intelligent, easy to push around once you push the right buttons.
Video Link
And blacks see themselves as superior to whites in athleticism, oratory, charisma, soulfulness, musicality, and ‘muh dick’ and ‘muh booty’.
And many whites worship blacks as the tougher, badass, awesome race, just like many whites venerate Jews as a race of wits, geniuses, big thinkers, and rich folks. Whites got Jungle Fever and Jungle Faith. White women lust after black men, and white guys worship blackness as ‘cool’. Whites love rap music.
So, the problem isn’t just Jewish and black resentment but white awe of Jewishness and blackness, the two pillars(with homos being the third pillar) of current conception of Western Civilization.
Consider. Even when Brits argue that Muslims shouldn’t be welcome in the UK because Islam isn’t compatible with Western Values, they are not talking about white identity, white unity, and white race-ist pride. They are saying the Muslims aren’t sufficiently reverent toward Jews, homos, and blacks.
As for Sailer, he may discuss Jewish resentments, but it isn’t to reject Jews but to assure them that their hostility is uncalled for because whites just love, adore, and respect Jews.
In other words, don’t be so upset that you guys are less attractive than whites because you guys are superior where it really counts: wit and will, and that’s why whites will always grovel at your feet.
She’s playing one by insinuation, but she isn’t one if I’m not mistaken. It’s much like Adam Driver, unrelated, he’s basically playing Jews.
Then the class hissed….ssssssssssssssss!
Three Days in a Helicopter.
White girl kidnapped and raped by a nog, for three days in a helicopter. The film within the Novel.
Did Amy Wax attack TOO? — if not, why is it ‘slightly odd’ that she’s mentioned favorably? — Cofnas is mentioned unfavorably because he went after TOO in much the same disingenuous manner he himself was attacked — wasn’t that the whole point of the article?
When more mainstream immigration restriction groups like CIS and NumbersUSA would attack Vdare, Peter Brimelow called this ‘triangulation’ — Brimelow saw it as these groups trying to make themselves look better (or less bad) by comparison.
Perhaps that’s more or less what Cofnas was doing by taking shots at TOO.
‘Scarlett Johannson is in fact half Danish/Swedish through her father Karsten Olaf Johansson and half Polish/Russian Jewish through her mother Melanie Sloan.’ — jinxen54
Just goes to illustrate a curious Hollywood and mainstream media phenomenon, in which half-Jews who ‘read’ superficially as being from another culture are vigorously promoted.
Even those with no Judaic genetic ancestry find it advantageous to adopt Jewish-sounding surnames: Martin Sheen; Don Lemon [Lehman]; Whoopi Goldberg.
Fake it till you make it. The Nose knows.
Maybe I read this in hurry and misunderstood it:
https://www.palestinechronicle.com/breaking-israeli-assassination-attempt-targets-hezbollah-leader-analysis/
but it appears to me that the huge bomb dropped by Israel on a residential neighborhood of Beirut in an attempt to assassinate Nasrallah killed hundreds of people but missed Nasrallah because he diabolically managed to hide in tunnel dug long ago by Hezbollah right under the Knesset building!
The fact that Hezbollah, like Hamas, use human shields has never stopped Israel from destroying such structures as schools or hospitals.
This should be no different. Get him! Leave just a deep,. smoking crater where the Knesset is!
‘Black women tend to get super fat. It’s just reality, just like them having big butts.’ — Dr Rock
The medical term is steatopygia. Pretty sure I learnt that term from Aldous Huxley. Follow the science, my friend.
Saw an example just last weekend. ‘The ratio’ — waist circumference ideally equals two-thirds of hip circumference, as in the Sixties expression ’36-24-36′ [accompanied by suggestive hand gestures and a provocative leer] — becomes hideous and horrifying when it degenerates to 1:2.
And 1:1 is equally b-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-d. :-0
I read the text and will skim the comments later. What can be concluded? Many things we think we know, we really don’t. Not only the term kikes which etymology is shown in the text:
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/kike
I wonder if Ron will confirm that explanation in his current research or if he will find the one that is really right. That ignorance is only the tip of the invisible iceberg of our ignorance. It also refers to stereotype about Jewish ugliness and stereotypic Shylockish caricatures. Two examples that come to mind are Weinstein and Jonathan Greenblatt. It is forgotten that Jews are not a race, nor do they have the same origin, even though the mainstream tries to convince us otherwise.
According to that theory, Ashkenazi Jews do not exist as a separate group, even though they make up 85% of the world’s Jews and represent the majority in Israel as well. Someone beat me to it above with a picture of a young Victoria Nuland. Are her ancestors from Palestine?
So, in addition to the name kikes, we don’t even know the true origin of the Jews. Is it possible (with reference to the Irish case in the US) that from 50 K in the 15th century, 8 million Jews arose in Eastern Europe, only by a demographic baby boom in the context of economic hardship, wars, diseases and pogroms? (Those interested can read the comment in Open Thread #10 (item #93).
So, in summary, we have two (related) topics for discussion – the true meaning of the term kikes and the true origin of the Jews.
Here’s one random and illustrative male example – Tony Curtis (some like it hot).
No word on Nasrallah alive or dead. His daughter was killed. The Israeli’s bombed 6 buildings all Hezbollah head quarters. Sorry to ruin your day, but the Jews are definitely taking out those Jihadist. There really is no where for them to hide. Hezbollah is going down.
Yes, I agree. That is exactly what the following quote by one the greatest thinkers who ever lived promulgates:
Schopenhauer had a whole metaphysics of beauty which is also worth a look, but it had mostly to do with art. But I think we can apply what he thought about art, to some degree, also to people. And what is interesting and germane to the above article is that he thought there was a clear distinction between the “ugly” — which he thought might even have its place in art — and the “repellent”, as in the quote below:
This distinction is key in the discussion above, because the classical Jew look is not merely ugly — it is downright repellent. It provokes a strong emotional reaction which attacks the viscera directly, if not the amygdala: the fight-flight-freeze response is triggered almost automatically. Perhaps this is just another reason why, as Schopenhauer also said, a “small, isolated, capricious, hierarchical (i.e., ruled by false notions), obscure people, like the Jews, [is] despised by the great contemporary nations of the East and of the West.”
She looks mean: “I’m a Jew and you’re an Arab and you will cede your land to me and get lost. You can do it willingly but one way or the other you will. The Powers that be are with me and you are as nothing.”[is how she thinks]
Jones is not an Aryan (just like panzers). In addition to kikes and the true origin of the Jews, it is a third case for discussion and something we do not know but arrogantly think we do.
Agree. And letting gluttony rub off on one does not help either.
Good missing of the point here.
The entire edifice of Hollywood is a bunch of ETs normalizing themselves around the goyim.
So Felicity Jones plays a basilisk Jewess. So Weiss plays the hideous Etc…Minnie Driver plays a coded Jewess etc…it’s essential Spielberg normalizing Jewish attitudes for the suckers. Also at least the Cohen Brothers are a little more obvious about when they do it. Like the Sobchak character in Lebowski.
Funny article, a good break!
The 150 Most Beautiful Jewish Actresses in Hollywood
https://www.imdb.com/list/ls064975609/
Something like the difference between a burp and a belch.
This discussion is not about making fun; it is about making sense of a putative group trait. Two notable traits of the Ashkenazim have been “made sense of” by considering how natural and sexual selection could have brought them into existence because of the unique economic niche of the Ashkenazim in Eastern Europe. Most prominent is the trait of high verbal and mathematical (but not spatial) intelligence, which could have been plausibly of selective advantage during business dealings. The second and less discussed trait is sociopathy, which could have clearly been of selective advantage in allowing maximum extraction of profits, especially when dealing with counterparties who are in a subordinate social position, e.g., Slavic peasants.
Consider a third putative trait of the Ashkenazim: age-related changes of countenance that make them appear less “approachable.” Approachable is defined as “welcoming, easy to talk to.” I posit that Ashkenazi men, the extractors of Slavic peasant kopecks, were more effective in that role when they appeared “unapproachable.” Heavy eyebrows, curl of lip, a permanent sneer on the face could have been adaptations of the Ashkenazi businessmen to forestall complaints, objections and entreaties of the Slavic counterparties of their businesses. Under this explanation, any reduction in beauty as young adults would have, as the ontogenetic basis of late-middle-age unwelcoming countenances, been unavoidable.
Aging Northern Europeans, in contrast, do not appear to be transmitting any negative vibes.
https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-highland-scottish-clan-old-man-in-traditional-highland-dress-at-the-31485293.html?imageid=FE6C5FFC-63B3-4955-BAD0-3BFEA0F81FBB&p=271805&pn=1&searchId=7d3de0ebddde339738e51319386c5a05&searchtype=0
Ooops! Someone just dropped their kosher card for all to see.
PF writes the following:
and then proceeds to talk only about their sense of superiority, failing to realize that it is itself a collective response to their inferiority complex by his own admission. But instead of talking about that PF talks about white inferiority. As if the whites here at TUR feel inferior to either blacks or Jews.
Like I said, someone just dropped their kosher card for all to see.
Yid prominent in facial surgery to hide the ugly s0ul.
Change face, change name.
5ds
A good Larry Johnson interview
Video Link
Who are Ashkenazim? What is their origin?
LOL 😆 and agree. 👍
You’d better elaborate on that. I was speaking of my take on what the society was, not commenting on the plot. I don’t remember the plot that well and none of the characters grabbed me. Except for Lenina, for the obvious reason. Huxley described her as “pneumatic.” What else do you need to know?
Well, she was OK looking as a young woman, but as it was stated, that’s a professional studio portrait of the young Bader.
As I comment, in my shallow moments, about some women’s looks, ‘The miracle of modern makeup…. and modern photography’. 😆
Physical attractiveness is rare, rare enough for it to have commercial value for women. Most people are ordinary, some Ok, others not so. Mutational load that Dutton Perhaps ugly Jews are noticed because Jews as a whole tend to be in the public eye to a relatively greater degree, eg show business, than other nationalities.
This is completely delusional and all of these faces look relatively normal, certainly better looking than 50% of the average population in Europe or anywhere else. Nathan Cofnas looks equally Irish, Polish, German, British or anything else besides Jewish which is not itself in particular breed necessarily. All those Israeli soldiers who fell in the war are often very handsome people, you’re being wildly dishonest. Nobody could possibly believe any of this and asking any random sample of human beings would produce a completely different result than this stupid article.
That woman who is accused of spreading lies about some college students or whatever is pretty fine looking actually, I mean the average lower class human being is not pretty and she’s attractive by any measure. I wonder what Tobias Langdon looks like, that he’s so weirdly obsessed with other people and whether they accept things or not. Far as I can tell Nathan Cofnas is normal looking and only weirdos judge other people that closely. I guess the author is gay like most Nazis.
Sounds like the author is wildly jealous and probably an ugly little cretin no doubt
Isn’t that the basis of normal politeness? You people are uncivil and degenerate, morbidly obsessed with other people.
In fact, the actress to portray the ‘esteemed’ RBG looks pretty close to her as a young woman.
The Judaisation of Western societies proceeds apace, the latest facet being the normalisation of genocide and criminalisation of opposition to it, so long as it is being performed by the ‘right’ people.
Schopenhauer is presaging Orwell-‘At fifty everybody has the face they deserve’.
“Aging Northern Europeans, in contrast, do not appear to be transmitting any negative vibes.” I wish. I am pretty Northern European and my wife used to chide me about my tendency to intimidate people with my usual demeanor. My defense was that my face is just that way. I’m not smiley and people would interpret my facial expressions as bored or hostile.
I believe you could better spend your time on contemplation and consideration of solutions to the Gentiles’ problem of sheer and elemental survival. We have a major piece of machinery that is out of service and needs repair, spare parts, overhaul, and restoration. We have spent endless decades and centuries describing, delineating, analyzing and inspecting the “Jewish Question”. I don’t think there is anything more to expose, except another episode of evil and perfidy that has bubbled up from the tar pit.
I have for some years proposed several plans, in phases and detail, plus referred to sources that have provided concrete guidance. The vast majority of herded Goyim prefer to describe the problem, layering and layering the same rugs on the floor. By now, they are higher than the roof.
Nobody that I have encountered has the framework or initial movement of tactics or strategist. In the marine world, in the middle of the ocean, you don’t get paid to endlessly describe what is wrong, and condemn the manufacturer, the designer, the people that served before you, etc., etc. You are there on YOUR ship, which is your life support, to fix whatever problems exist, make the machine or system produce an output of its function, and resurrect it. You go to sea with what you have. If you don’t have the spare parts, your attempt to make them, rebuild them {e.g., weld, machine/modify, or create a whole part out of billet stock. Or, you make alterations and deviate from standard practice.
“We need to ________”(generalization, simple one-step) is 4 cards of a suite to a flush. You don’t get any share of the the pot. The Heebie Jeebies lay down specific plans, phased in, interconnecting, which are causes and effects, detailed, with concrete resources, consonance of people and objects and tools. Coordinated. While the Gentile presumes that his prayers and The Personal Savior will arrive just before midnight and miracles will be performed. The Rapture.
Oh, I know. All that is required to set off a massive counter force and rising tide of push back and reclamation of the Gentiles’ lost and stolen articles is…….Name The Jew. That’s right. Name the cause of the casualty or fault that shut down your machine and the lights will come back on and you will be moving again through the water. Well, we are all Frenchmen now. Easily distracted and relying on ersatz Reality to mark our trails.
“Aging Northern Europeans, in contrast, do not appear to be transmitting any negative vibes.” I wish. I am pretty Northern European and my wife used to chide me about my tendency to intimidate people with my usual demeanor. My defense was that my face is just that way. I’m not smiley and people would interpret my facial expressions as bored or hostile. Jewish unapproachability is a function of their general hostility toward their non-Jewish counterparts, not their facial features.
Catherine Zeta-Jones is a prostitute who married Michael Douglas for his money and to advance her career through his Jewish/Hollywood network connections. She’s the epitome of a casting couch whore.
It’s also the motive for the exceptionally high rate of intermarriage among Jews in the United States, so as to better blend in with the oblivious and insouciant white European-American population. Ashkenazim are already heavily mixed with European genes, but when you place most Ashkenazi women in a room full of Minnesota, Scandinavian blondes they stick out like a hoodrat on Wall Street.
That is not even remotely true, the British who resent Muslim presence are clearly responding to Muslim aggression and crime. Not for some weird “woke” reasons
The whole thing is wildly delusional, you could take almost anybody and just change their clothing besides location and it easily seems like something else. Most of it is just impressions based on fallacies that people seem to come up with.
Ashkenazi is not specifically distinct from any other Jewish race, and people are virtually interchangeable with the differences being more European or more Arab. It’s like comparing North and yesterday or trees with socks, all things could be intersecting a different points together all at the same time.
It’s literally the same origin as everybody else, Asia Minor the Cacusus and Persia
And, long before Photoshop, studio photographers were adept at “touch-up,
air brushing” and other techniques to make sure customers were pleased.
Who wants to show-off their moles, pimples, cross-eyes and nose hairs?
Ruth was gifted a Gentile nose.
@fran taubman, not you Jim H
His daughter was killed? That will put him in a good mood,
good enough to kill thousands of Jews,
maybe even some in NYC.
A few on this list are not full Jewish and some aren’t Jewish at all. Unless they’re hiding something. Who knows? Who cares? It does nothing to deter from TL’s point.
Huh? Is that an axiom? “Evolution can never be a method to find good concepts?” What kind of reasoning is this?
Evolution does not automatically result in good things, but systems with genetic optimisation can do a superior job in finding stuff that may otherwise be almost impossible to find.
It may actually be used by a lazy god (‘let it run for some time, it will get there in the end’). Kind-of my way of gardening. I think my gardening is objectively good.
I suppose you think Michel Houellebecq does not have a “classical” Gentile look.
Here’s my simple theory about how beauty is determined
within an ethnic group or race. It is established over time
as the most common or average appearing features within
the group, and deviations are considered less attractive
by their degree of difference from that average.
As ethnic groups were exposed to other groups, the process
of comparing them began, much to the detriment of the
Blacks whose features differed most from the average
features of Europeans and Asians.
Since many European Jews, aside from their dress or accents,
are similar to White Gentiles, the ones who have retained
Mideast features are seen as lacking beauty or a handsome
appearance. At the same time, we have to explain why some
men and women who are “exotic” are considered to be
appealing by the opposite sex, and how how personality
affects our perception of beauty.
Many may disagree, but I doubt that there is an absolute or
objective standard of human beauty, while noting the obvious,
that our physical form is limited by functionality.
Comparatively high verbal and low spatial intelligence we also measure in women and blacks.
From all three groups we know they don’t produce verbals of value, just babble.
Who are the everybody else?
Does this mean that Ashenazim don’t really exist as a separate group, but it’s just an arbitrary name without any real substance?
What about Sephardim? Do they exist as a group with specific features? What is actually distinction between them?
Those who write about the Nordic features probably do not know where from (and when) the ‘Nordics’ came to Scandinavia. Those who think that Germans are Nordics are also wrong.
The typical ‘German look‘ comes from the Prussians who are not Germanics, because they are Europeans and the (original) Germans (no one knows what they were called before coming to Europe) are Asians, who came and took the land from the natives and assimilated many of them.
It would be interesting if someone could describe what the Germans (aka proto-panzers who still don’t know the meaning of their European name) looked like when they arrived in Europe, as well as whether the nomads, ancestors of the modern Westerners who came from the Russian steppes, were white. Please add this dilemma to the previous three topics I proposed for discussion.
Sweethome, have they retained the features and how could they retain them? Maybe the ancestors of some modern Jews never had anything to do with the Mideast?
There are also universal laws of aesthetics (eg, proportions, etc.).
Remember the iconic monumental film Ben Hur (1959) where director William Wyler despaired that almost all the main characters had blue eyes (Stephen Boyd had to wear dark contact lenses to play a nasty Roman).
In general, since the 1960s it has been de rigeur to cast diabolical villains with Nordic-looking people, even though all practical experience speaks against it. However, it has become part of the left-wing narrative.
We all look forward to your understanding and explanation of the term ‘kike’. Here, Tobi joined that research (Nobody wants. Nobody likes …kikes, kikes, kikes!). Here, in addition to circle (kikel) and kiki, we also learned from Tobi about the third (mainstream) version:
I believe that you will come with something completely new, but, alternatively, you can show us which of the previous versions is the most likely (or wittiest). Thanks in advance.
Presumably you refer to the Cucuteni – Tripyllia culture as the origin of Serbs. The idea has merit. I am always learning from your cultural-historical omniscience.
In general, ‘beauty’ is equated with a healthy appearance, i.e. symmetry in appearance and a pleasant (= confidence-inspiring) facial expression.
Sephardic Jews (such as Ofra Haza) fall into this category, as do many Armenian Christians, despite inbreeding due to cultural isolation.
It’s a little more complicated. In brief – the language of the people who called themselves ‘srb’ (serbs) (=relatives, people of the same race) originated in the Palaeolithic and has continuity to this day. In Tripoli (= three fields, in Serbian) they met nomads (friendly and enemies) from the Russian steppes, who were at least a couple thousands of years behind in terms of civilization, and who accepted the local Serbian language and culture.
Thus, in the encounter with friendly nomads, the modern Serbs (and later the rest of the Slavs who still spoke the Serbian language at that time) were born, and today they make up a sixth of Serbian genetics. From the primitive enemy nomads, who committed genocide against the natives of Europe, modern westerners arose.
Don’t mind me, I’m just having a good old chuckle here imagining all the tall, muscular, toned, blond, blue-eyed handsome Aryans here reading this drivel and agreeing that Jews are ugly. There are ugly and beautiful people of all races. I’m no Adonis myself. Young Jewish women are often strikingly attractive but I do agree they don’t age well.
Historians like to refer to this euphemistically as ‘blood refreshment’, like the immigration of the Dorians into Ionian Greece. A sort of booster, not necessarily using violence. Ancient cemeteries in Spain suggest that at the time of the migration of the Vandals, the different cultures lived largely peacefully side by side until a common version prevailed. In the course of time, and for the sake of harmony, they just blend.
Yes – make up, angles, lighting, and even photo doctoring (airbrushing) only succeed in making her look not hideous.
A sad measure for beauty indeed when the baseline is “not that bad.”
As has been stated plenty of times before, Jewish actresses are a poor marker of “Jewish” beauty for two significant reasons: 1. 99% of them have had extensive plastic surgery, and 2. most of them benefit from being half European/non Jewish.
Hell even Rashida Jones benefited from being half black !
Thanks for the video.
Larry Johnson is always good.
Sharif of Iran is a good man. The Iranians would be wise to keep him in positions of power and also do as best they can to protect him from murderous Zionists. If it’s one thing the Izraelis hate a lot it’s another westernized English speaking diplomat from the other side taking time away from their American sounding spokesman.
I’m afraid that Hezbolah’s missile capacity and capability has been greatly over estimated/exaggerated. I hope I’m wrong.
Yes and lol. 😆
Alright.
Although the gammas, deltas and epsilons are depicted at play, in prescribed leisure hours, in Huxley’s novel, they are viewed from above.
They have to ride trains to their own fields of play.
He does mention them also engaged in compulsory erotic play. It means nothing, except keeping them under control.
Since Huxley’s dystopia has achieved total separation of the sex act from procreation, no sexual activity has any relation to anything. Including among alphas and betas. It is just fun, and for alphas and betas, social connections. Class and death acceptance training, too, are universally applied.
John the Savage, natural child of an alpha male and a beta female, brought up in the savage reservation, only really knowing Lenina Crowe’s aphorisms and Shakespeare, is totally disruptive when returned to ‘civilisation’.
I have lately found many commenters here to be very stupid, don’t usually find you so.
Also, Huxley wrote a detailed personal letter to Blair (Orwell), stating that the dystopia of the latter was very well written, and he enjoyed reading it, but it would inevitably dissolve into something like Huxley’s. The letter is published and easy to find. I don’t agree with it, but it is certainly worth reading.
Huxley also wrote a long essay, Brave New World Revisited, also easy to find, well-written, you may try reading it.
Yeah, she’s attractive and I think I heard her speak once and she seemed pleasant. Maybe she has some Italian in her. Not so much the temperament but the looks. 😅
The Ashkenazi are the result of Jewish males moving to Rome and marrying Italian females. The Sephardi Jews(Middle Eastern Jews) have maintained this thesis for centuries and modern genetic analysis confirms it. The Sephardi also insist that the Ashkenazi are not “real Jews” because the line started with gentile mothers. If you think Ashkenazi Jews are ugly, take a gander at the Sephardi. They are easily recognizable by a characteristic totally weird squashed down protruding nose and a distinctly dark complexion. I have seen this both in a Jewish family from Lebanon that only came to North America in the 1960’s and a Jewish family from Deal, New Jersey that doesn’t acknowledge any Mid-East origin, exact same weird nose and bizarre dark complexion, totally unlike the Ashkenazi. BTW, the “Khazarian Hypothesis” is total bunk.
Naomi did admit that she once “had a little Italian” in her.
She added that she had been drinking and couldn’t be
sure, but guessed it was Danny De Vito or some other
“smallish WOP.”
Hey fran,
Relax, if you are ashkenazi, you aren’t really truly “jewish” anyways. Your female line isn’t “semitic” at all. It is European White gentile.
https://www.livescience.com/40247-ashkenazi-jews-have-european-genes.html
So all you ashkenazis are only mamzer half breeds anyways. Since you guys are all half European gentile, could you please do all us White gentiles a big favor and stop pushing the White genocide, and stop pushing the anti White agenda….and convince “your people” to stop doing the same?
After all, wiping out the Europeans is wiping out half you ancestry. Thanks for the assist Fran.
A lot of people pose the question, which one will it be? Brave New World or 1984? My response is, why not both? We already have the two intermingled to a degree. We have the world of 1984 for the masses and a self-appointed Alpha overclass largely practicing eugenic breeding in the hopes of creating its own successors. Sometimes the eugenic calculations cross the boundaries of duplication and move into the territory of creating new types in the hope that these will be more capable of succeeding in the conditions which will prevail in the future. In that way, maybe breeding selection itself can be seen as kind of an arms race.
In literature there any number of types of criticism. Just to name a few, Freudian, Marxist, formalist, structuralist, historicist and so on. Religious-based criticism is yet another type.
When I see critical discussions of Brave New World based on interpersonal psychology it kind of rubs me the wrong way. The people who have done this kind of criticism maybe see something of themselves and the people around them in these characters in terms of their ethnic or racial type and kind of daily lives they are living.
This kind of criticism I think fails to account for the fact that all of the people in this fictional society are artificial biological creations mired in an inescapable mediocrity and leading inauthentic and hollow lives. There is a moral horror to the whole thing which you cannot just let go over your head.
Compare that to the world of 1984. Bad though the Big Brother dictatorship may be, life in the Oceania superstate does represent life as the human race has always known it. A tyrannical overclass which thinks with reptilian logic, a nervous ninny-neurotic middle class mired in a near-future time orientation and an often sodden and depressed proletariat and underclass.
My approach to literature is structuralist and formalist, but my structuralism is the structuralism of social science, not literary structuralism. I am also a literary naturalist both in fiction writing and in criticism. My recent (2021) master’s thesis was on the topic of literary naturalism in the fiction of Willa Cather. You will be able to find it if you try.
I picked Cather because I didn’t want to go after something that was over my head. I read one of her novels in the 1970s and liked it. I did identify her as practicing a type of naturalism that was different than that of the male literary naturalists of the age and more rooted in biological or ecological naturalism, meaning the study of living communities in real time and of what determines how the individual organism lives and dies. There was a lot of death in Cather. She did death very naturalistically.
For another thing, I am partially of Bohemian (Czech) and Swedish descent and I thought that Cather in her Prairie Trilogy was writing about people of my blood. My forebearers were of the artisan class though. None were farmers and no collateral relatives (cousins close or distant) that I know of became farmers.
What a bizarre and lame comment – one of the worst I’ve seen here on unz (other than basically 99% of comments by meamjewjew). Sensing a tribe member/crypto. Who, who really knows the tribe as a whole, would come up with such nonsense?
Bullshit. They are not “more intelligent”. If they were, then they would humiliate us in debates, and destroy us with their logic, reason, and consistency. Yet they cannot. They cannot defeat the alt right and other counter semitic voices in any debates, thus they censor us. If they were so “brilliant”, they wouldn’t need to censor everyone that refutes their jewish bullsht narratives. They also would not need to viciously promote other jews and demote more qualified and more intelligent non jews….but they do all the time. Without jews dominating the narrative via their ability to censor and dominate the msm and hollywood, their control would dwindle. They know it. That is why they are so obsessed with censoring others.
Also, how is it “intelligent” to replace the White gentiles of Europe and the Anglosphere with infinity paki, mexican, and african migrants? Europeans have come up with something like 90% of all technological inventions, cures, medicines since 1500. I fail to see how the jewish agenda of wiping the Europeans out and replacing them with low IQ third worlders is “more-so intelligent”. Please explain that one to the readers.
jews=”anyone that criticizes individual jews, jewish power, or israel is an anti semite bigot that must be censored, punished, and lose their job. Ideally, they would be imprisoned or executed. We must make laws to stop people from criticizing jews and/or israel. Non jews need to serve jewish interests….it is in the torah. Kings and Queens should serve the jews and lick the dust from our feet. When the jewish messiah comes, each jew will get 2,800 non jewish slaves.”
Knowing that most religious, if not almost all jews believe in such supremacist, megalomaniacal crap, how the flock could any fair-minded person seriously claim “the jews don’t sufficiently love themselves?
Are you fecking kidding me? They worship themselves you moron. That’s what their whole religious cult is about.
Yeah, yeah. Super lovable. Subverting the US and Europe so they can steal money from western taxpayers and get western politicians to do their bidding and let israel commit a genocide against civilians in Gaza. Super lovable in trying to get the US to destroy Iraq and Iran for jewish interests. Super lovable when pushing a replacement level non White immigration agenda in Europe and the Anglosphere. So “super lovable”.
What a moron. If anything, they, and their bullsht are super hate-able. Hence the reason jews have been expelled from over 1,000 locations throughout time. They are so “lovable” that even the indians of Guatemala couldn’t stand having jewish psychopathic supremacists around.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-28992743
Not lovable at all. Whining, annoying, self serving, arrogant, supremacist, hypocritical, and selfish? Yes. “Super lovable”? No!!!
But remember he’s a Boomer: enquiring minimally, comfortably and above all, not wanting to rock the boat, so exploring hard truths is forbidden.
Thanks. I hadn’t heard of Cather before. Will look into her writing and perhaps find your thesis.
If you haven’t before, do try to check the letter and retrospective that I suggested.
To me, as an outside observer, either dystopia would be preferable to reality in any western country. After all, neither Blair nor Huxley could have imagined a ruling class that would simply and recklessly have the people invaded.
Much peasant, small farmer, rural labour background for me, but most close relatives, more artisan.
Most of what has been said is acceptable, but there is a lack of logic from end to end. Who are these ‘Italian women’? How (and when) did the Jews find themselves in Central Europe? How is it possible that out of 50 K (15th century) there are 8 million Jews in Eastern Europe (20th century)? Can it be explained by an (isolated) demographic boom? How did it come to be that Ashkenazis make up more than 85% of the total number of Jews? How (when and where) did Yiddish originate?
Yeah, truly strange that jews want to exterminate White gentiles…especially considering it is half of their genetic makeup:
https://www.livescience.com/40247-ashkenazi-jews-have-european-genes.html
I chalk it up to most ashkenazis being ignorant about their true history. Just like when I tell most Scots that they are really named after an Irish tribe…..that were called the “Scotti” from Ireland, they shake their heads in ignorant disbelief.
Most of humanity seem to be unread, lazy buffoons…whether they are jews or not.
No, they don’t belong:
1. Because they hate us and our people.
2. Because they aren’t us, and are competitors and will push agendas that benefit their people even if it harms our people.
There is a reason ethnostates are more stable. Diversity=division, and division eventually leads to conflict. It’s not complicated.
Japan has a little over 125 million people….almost 100% of them are racially east Asian, and the overwhelming majority (over 98%) are ethnic Japanese. Would japan be better off if 25% of Japan’s population was mexican, and 15% was nigerian, 12% were Irish, and the rest were Japanese? With this “diversity”, would japan be more socially cohesive, safer, and better off? Clearly the answer to that question is NO!
Dieversity is a recipe for unrest and distrust.
My wife works for the county of LA. She says in her department, the chinese hate the filipinos, who hate the armenians, who hate the mexicans….and they all are tribal and look to benefit their own ethny and not the others.
Not a recipe for “success” and long term stability
Longshanks, both of them (and the Welsh) are Celts, but do you know the original meaning of the term Scots, if you already hammered them?
Cliche corner (they are cliches because they are true…)
Handsome is as handsome does
Ugly as sin
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Best of all: A hit, a hit, a very palpable hit!
It’s very funny to see that they object to being called ugly. When they edited the New Testament version of JC’s Whipping of the Pharisees in the Temple, they must have left that bit out. After whipping them and calling them liars and blood thirsty Devil worshippers, JC and the boys’ parting words were: And not only that but you are all very ugly!
Ostfront veteran and Plattdeutscher Hannecke Kardel reports on the existence of tall, blond haired and blue eyed Jews in Marocco during his post war decades there. His superb book, Adolf Hitler: Begruender Israels has the funniest opening paragraph you will ever read in an historical work.
Nathan is not ugly as such: a couple of weeks Freude durch Arbeit in the open air, some snazzy threads and a bit of spiritual work would make him quite a handsome man…
The article needs one addition to improve it: A picture of Toby next to Nathan with the tagline: Who’s a prettier boy then?
It is heartening to see beauty being discussed, as there seems to be so much ugliness around in man made structures and art as well as in some people’s behaviour.
In the early years of the Roman Empire, 2000 years ago, Syria, Egypt, and Anatolia became Provinces of The Empire, and the residents of the provinces had freedom of travel throughout the Pax Romana. As the saying goes: “All roads lead to Rome”. Jewish males of wealthy families relocated to Rome for business and political contacts. They married Roman women as this gave them Roman family connections. Like Jews moving to New York City or London and becoming Americans or British, they went where the business and political action was. Rich people need families to pass on inherited wealth. Simple common sense. I don’t know exactly “when” Jews filtered into Central Europe, but you certainly see zero Jews in the areas of Europe opposed to the Roman Empire, so I suppose the Jews filtered in on the heels of the infamous Northern Crusades during the Medieval Period. Regarding numbers of Jews in Europe, The United States imported less that 400,000 useless low IQ Negroes before 1803 and 200 years later there are 40,000,000 infesting the USA, so 50K Jews growing to 8 million infesting Eastern Europe in 500 years does not seem surprising…..Yiddish is merely corrupted German.
You don’t say, eh?
The Scots moved to Britain after buggering and murdering all the Serbian homosexuals. Today’s Serbs are a mixture of Negroes and Gypsies (screw that “Roma” noise) who moved into the area afterwards.
Complete and utter bullshit.
If Japan wants more people, it doesn’t need to replace their own people with foreigners that despise them.
Europe is doing that and so is the Anglosphere, and it isn’t “working”..
The only way to mask its failure is through heavy handed censorship, political, social, and economic suppression. All pro White advocacy groups for the most part in the west are severely repressed.
Repression of dissidents is a sign that something is rotten. Its a sign that an agenda is being pushed that the masses hate.
BTW, what makes you think populations have to grow and grow and grow for eternity? Aren’t natural resources limited? So why does Japan’s population have to grow? Is this written in stone somewhere, that human populations must expand beyond the carrying capacity of their environment?
So jew, why doesn’t your homeland of israel invite millions of subsaharan africans to move to israel if it would be so “beneficial”?
‘
Self serving jewish lies. “Essential” my ass. England was fine after I expelled the parasites from my land. It was only the rat pos cromwell that invited the dirty bloodsuckers back.
Without non jews to leech off of, jews would not amount to anything. Just imagine israel today without the backing of hundreds of billions in weapons, technology, and money from the US and Europe.
If jews were “self supporting”, they wouldn’t need western weapons, or money. Capisce shlomo?
I already said that you should present your ID with every comment because there are new readers who don’t know you and your species, which you represent perfectly, while you try to hide in the general population and present yourself as normal.
So, I will present your ID:
https://www.unz.com/article/tucker-carlsons-non-denial-denialism-of-the-holocaust/#comment-6757916
Everybody else means the rest of Jewish dispersion and history. Sephardi and Ashkenazi often interchange and it depends on the mixture of ancestral population, obviously. You ask way too many bewildered questions instead of just observing the human condition like any anthropologist could easily do.
Carlton S Coon published a very well-known book back in the 1930s or so, full of photos and so forth. Discusses the racial origins of the Jewish people. Obviously the Ashkenazi people “exist” meaning there was a large number of Yiddish speakers in Eastern Europe until recently. It’s a hugely varied population with many origins, language and culture have a way of spreading.
The best analogy is Hispanic, which includes anything from Latin Europe Mediterranean to Celtic over to South America and Central America, all kinds of different people. What unifies them is ancestral connection to Spain the language and Roman Catholicism.
The Sephardic people by definition spoke Ladino and are included within the Hispanic world. It’s clear from anthropology and history that Eastern European Jews derive from Asia Minor, the old Persian empire, the caucuses, Western Asia. The Sephardic trend came from Mesopotamia and the original Phoenician colonies, speaking generally. A lot of “Jewish” is the conversion of similar people towards what must have been the superior culture, the same way other nations became Latin or German speaking instead of something else.
Islam and arabism have the very similar effect, as this civilizational culture and language with its religion spread across the middle lands of the old world. Some people got their culture from the Arabs and have henceforth been Muslims even though they are Indonesians etc
https://www.theapricity.com/snpa/racesofeurope.htm
The Jews were never expelled from anywhere, just converted. You made the whole thing up in your mind, it’s obviously wrong. The point is that Jewish elements are at the foundation of France, Spain, Northern and Southern Italy, and of course Poland and Hungary besides Austria.
There are literal lines of Jewish kings in Austria and Hungary, the word could mean practically anything. There was a time when Celtic and Gothic tribes were called “Jews”. Again you’re getting mentally confused about some random stories from the Middle ages that are completely wrong.
Trollette
Your comment is laughably incoherent, so it is difficult to know what point you think you are making….that there were Jews in Mesopotamia and Persia is entirely irrelevant to the issue of the origin of the Ashkenazi(European) Jews. The Ashkenazi Jews did not exist prior to the Roman Empire period, when Jews of Historical Syria and Egypt could freely travel and settle in Rome, and married Roman(Italian) women. This is the origin of the Ashkenazi(European) Jews. This fact is beyond dispute, confirmed by modern genetic analysis. The Jews of Eastern Europe are Ashkenazi. There is zero evidence that Sephardi(Middle Eastern) Jews independently settled Eastern Europe or Ukraine. The Sephardi never spoke Yiddish or anything remotely like it. That Yiddish(vulgarly corrupted German) was spoken by Eastern European Ashkenazi strongly suggests a migratory line from the Roman Empire Provinces to Germany and into Eastern Europe. There was no “Jewish empire” of Khazaria. The Khazarians were a Steppe People following an Animist religion. Allegedly, for some unknown reason, the Royal Family converted to the Jewish cult. The rest of the population stayed Animist. The Khazars were genocided by the Mongols and their culture utterly destroyed so it is difficult to know what really happened there, if anything. The entire story is, at best, poorly sourced. Fertile ground for crackpot pseudo-historians.
More specifically:
https://www.theapricity.com/snpa/chapter-XI7.htm
Traces the anthropological origins of modern jewry
It is possible to arbitrarily insert some detail in the course of history that may even be true, but if there is no logic from end to end, without any holes, then the whole story is worthless.
Here’s a detail:
WHO called it Celts and Goths – Jews? What is that statement trying to do? To somehow connect the Goths and the Jews as was already attempted by the panzers who, in addition, claimed to be Aryans? This cannot be true because the term Jews has been around recently and did not exist in the time of the Goths.
You are trying to present two contradictory facts as valid. First, that the converts to Judaism are various peoples (Persia, the Caucasus, Western Asia, etc.), which means that they have no genetic connection with the Palestinian Jews.
The second place mentions converts who are actually very similar (I guess genetically). Thus, it remains undefined whether Ashkenazis and Sephardim are the same (genetic) group. The commentary is a mixture of current theories – Rhineland, Khazar and Punic.
The Rhineland, for example, talks about the same origin (so the term Ashkenazi is just semantics) and that Jews from Germany went to Eastern Europe, where their number increased enormously due to the demographic boom (from 50K to 8 million in 500 years).
A lot of “Jewish” is the conversion of similar people towards what must have been the superior culture, the same way other nations became Latin or German speaking instead of something else.
According to what, the converts to Judaism did it because of the supposed transition to a superior culture? Give us one example of cultural superiority.
The language part is completely meaningless (Latin, Yiddish). Yiddish is not a German dialect and how is it possible that Jews, for example in Russia, speak a German dialect.
So, decide according to the current mainstream hypotheses – Khazar, Rhineland (with the Punic variant) and point out the elements with which you disagree. Alternatively, you can subscribe to the Odyssey’s Hypothesis (c) where you also will get a bonus in terms of the meaning of the word Germany (and depending on my current mood, the meaning of Europe, too).
You should angrily demand very specific history lessons on the internet, hands on hips. Magic disembodied voices will answer all of your stupid questions, although Goths and Jews were definitely around at the same time LOL Try learning some calendar perhaps, or simple arithmetic.
ALL OF THE THEORIES are probably accurate together. People went from west to east and from south to north and ended up in the same place. Yiddish is clearly German, it’s mutually intelligible with Hebrew words and other phrases mixed into it. The cultural superiority is that people who were acclimatized in Western Europe are clearly going to be superior in technology and experience to those in Eastern Europe. The example is that a German dialect spread into Russia, so it’s just normal inference. People adopt Latin because it was a “superior culture” to the locals. Just like English has expanded today, do I need to prove the cultural superiority for that as well?
Be sure to angrily demand some more history lessons tho. Here imagine that Google was optional:
https://www.theapricity.com/snpa/chapter-XI7.htm
Imagine people much smarter than you already did all the work and all that has to happen is shut your goddamn mouth and read. Imagine you had a job
I have no reason to be angry, but you obviously do, and that’s why you’re showing frustration. The lack of logic cannot be compensated for by any additional reading. It is simply a ridiculous attitude (but understandable given the milieu it comes from) that all theories are correct even if they show contradictions. If the facts do not agree with them, so much the worse for the facts.
You obviously have no idea about linguistics. Otherwise, you would have known that at the time of the supposed arrival of the Jews (you obviously don’t even know when that term dates from) from Germany, the German language almost didn’t even exist, so to speak.
And what? – Jews from Germany come to Eastern Europe with Yiddish, which is a German language (dialect), while another stream of Jews comes from the south-east (Asia Minor, Persia, Caucasus) and in Russia they speak the same language (i.e. Persian-Caucasian-Asia Minor Jews speak German). LOL.
You have no idea about Latin, which no one speaks and from which not a single language arose, but only the Vatican took that provincial Apennine dialect as their official one. How is it that Yiddish (supposedly German) and Hebrew are the same (or mutually intelligible) languages?
You obviously leave the speculation that the Goths and the Jews are somehow related (lol) and you avoid giving an example of the cultural superiority of the Jews over the neighbouring Palestinian converts, who happen to be the same race(!?).
Who could I ask for history lessons from? Maybe you know, but you avoided saying, if there was a Jewish population boom and if it only refers to the ‘western‘ Jews, who spoke German, while the ones from the south-east were not such big fuc*ers (even though their language was similar to German)?
Since you are already an expert in German and Yiddish, you may know whether it is true that the derogatory name for Jews, kikes (‘nobody wants, nobody likes …kikes, kikes, kikes’), comes from the doubling of the frequent ending of their surnames, kiki (ki x 2) or, all theories are also true here, including kikel (circle) and Ikey-Kikey (mentioned in the comment #136)??
The sheer chutzpah of this Judeonazi troll is gobsmacking. Expelled from Rome 139 BCE, again in 19 CE, and 41-53 CE, 415 expelled from Alexandria, 1012 from Mainz, 12-14th centuries numerous expulsions from France, 1231 from Leicester, 1290 from all of England, 1360 from Hungary, 1420-1 from Austria, 1492 from Spain and Sicily, 1496 from Portugal, and on and on.
I do not support such actions, of course, although they are very frequent which ought to raise concerns. Many were given the ‘choice’ of conversion, and some did so while keeping their ongoing Judaism secret-the ‘cryptoJews’. As many observers have noted, some of the blame for these expulsions must lie with the Jews, and judging by their behaviour since 1947, that ‘some’ is probably very great.
Melanie, no matter how much Yahweh would love the blood, but you can’t kill them all. Sorry to disappoint. Nasrallah will be replaced, and the others, too. Eventually if you Judeonazis refuse to ever compromise with people you regard as animals, Israel will fall. Perhaps some new regime in Pakistan will tire of seeing Moslems slaughtered so callously, and nuke the Judenreich. Or one or more nukes will be stolen, and there you go. Your hatred will be the end of you, and most of the world will NOT shed a tear.
I don’t see how one of YOUR posts is my “ID” but whatevs. You really are in need of a good solid thorough daily anal snuffling. Being a lying Serb homosexual I imagine you’d enjoy that.
How do people navigate through your homosexuality and body odor in your daily life? You are as huge a pile of Serbian shit as Tesla was a genius. Not fit to rinse out his jizzrag, one of which I own, having bought it at auction. And yes, “jizzrag” is a Serbian word. In fact it’s most Serbian words.
You’re a strange puckery sort of fellow.
Not really. That is a one in a million picture. If you check the other pictures on that site she looks plenty horrid already in her early 20s.
Felicity Jones on the other hand is one of the prettiest girls the world has to offer. To have her play this gremlin Jew is an insult.
Meanwhile the globe continued spinning and billions of people lived and died over thousands of years everywhere. It’s a fantasy of your mind because it’s not even accurately described and it doesn’t mean there’s a giant group getting “expelled” from these places.
Something happened in France at the aristocratic level of government with a small number of people but suddenly Persia magically popped into the picture 2000 miles away. Effortless bubble thinking
Spain is a good example, considering about 100,000 people left during the Jewish expulsion out of several million Spanish Jews that were recorded in the previous centuries. Where did everybody go then who wasn’t expelled? You have literally zero grasp of history It’s more like playing with toy soldiers or board games.
This is why all of your takes are always wrong, but it’s hilarious so keep it up! Same as the Wogs, always making thousands of assumptions then all of a sudden they’re surprised when the missiles hit them. It’s because you live and believe in ideology instead of real-time facts, geometry and basic math.
“just you wait till next time it’s going to be different!” It’s always next time and always excuses and always the armchair general.
Anybody this arrogant has clearly never had a job or needed to produce anything, go play with your toy soldiers and imagine games while real people take the world.
There will be that nuclear bomb from Pakistan because that’s exactly what it reads in Revelations, but what you are confusing as a small country is actually the entire Western alliance. This is called “Israel” in the bible.
Out with some more regurgitation and atheist scoffing, but the foxhole catches up to everyone eventually.
My god you fake jews are so ignorant about your real history. Let me help you out here, shlomo.
1. Ashkenazi jews are not really jews at all. Your female line comes from White gentile European women and not semitic women.
https://www.livescience.com/40247-ashkenazi-jews-have-european-genes.html
2. Your jewish priests are pathological liars. They lied about jewish “history”.
a. The exodus tale is a LIE. jews were never slaves in Egypt. You need to apologize to Egyptians for spreading blood libels against them.
b. The esther/Haman story is a lie. It is ahistorical. It never happened.
c. The judith story is a lie. It is ahistorical. It never happened.
3. fake jews (ashkenazis) have indeed been expelled over 1,000 times. Why? Well, your jewish priests lie about that too. Fake jews have been expelled BECAUSE jews always push a jews-first agenda, even when that agenda harms their host people. It’s about jewish bad behaviors.
https://archive.org/details/the-complete-list-of-the-one-thousand-and-thirty-jewish-expulsions-in-human-history/page/n3/mode/2up
I’m wondering shlomo. Do you think you are being “tricky” like jacob deceiving Esau by lying to me and others about jewish expulsions? Why do so many of your people relish in telling absolute lies about things. You know dishonesty ranks right up there in the list of why jews have been expelled from so many places. So why can’t you stop lying and act like a normal, honorable, honest people?
ROFL….even Native Americans in Guatemala expelled your people for their rotten, selfish behavior.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-28992743#:~:text=Some%20230%20members%20of%20an%20Orthodox%20Jewish
I’m glad no paper was wasted on this effort. That last bitch is fine.
Mock the face of victory all you want.
You still lost the game.
From that perspective, your Barbie doll blondes are just cows.
Cows that castrate your children.
Fair enough, although at least they were girls. And maybe look up the phrase ‘double standard’, as there are cultures throughout the world–Islamic culture in particular–in which a 13-year-old girl is actually past her prime.
Be that as it may, Catholicism basically exists as a cover for grown men to ass-fuck young boys.
I realize you hate jews, but the Catholics are peerless when it comes to sexual depravity.
They were all white scythians, in short. German is what the Romans called these pure tribes ie “germane”. The people from the Russian steppes were dispersed Hebrew Israelites from the northern house that was carried away in the times of Assyria. And those who left earlier, moving into Asia Minor.
All of these “caucasians” (those who crossed north over the caucasus) and their ilk moved towards Western and Central Europe around the year 0 AD or thereafter. That’s when the Romans started into contact with these newly arrived peoples in “Germania”, and of course there’s all kinds of other people let’s say “Europeans” who were already present.
Basically what professor Tolkien had in mind with the horse mounted “Rohirrim”, notice the Hebrew plural that he also identified with “Haradrim”. These proto saxons or Isaac’s Sons are at the foundation of British and English speaking people everywhere today. That all goes back to ancient Scythia and Parthia
Thanks for sharing your giant mentally ill word salad as you have a nervous breakdown on the internet.
Typical boomer
The jew-owned “mainstream media” licked its chops when a small cabal of homosexual pedophilic priests was exposed within the Roman Catholic Church.
Although the number was small (but still reprehensible to say the least), the jew-owned “mainstream media” utilized its power to slander ALL Catholic clergy, and by inference, the Roman Catholic Church itself. This falls in line with the jewish belief in “collective responsibility”.
This same mainstream media conveniently left out the much greater homosexual pedophilia problem within Protestant denominations and its own problems with homosexual pedophilia rabbis within judaism. One only has to observe the recently discovered child sacrifice “tunnels” under NYC synagogues. Despite clear evidence of child sacrifices going on (blood-stained child-size mattresses, toddler high-chairs and other child-size items) NYC officials decided to destroy evidence of jewish child-sacrifices rather than preserve criminal evidence.
In fact, there is much more homosexual pedophilia behavior within Protestantism and judaism than there ever was in the Roman Catholic Church.
The jew-owned “mainstream media” used its own “play on words” to avoid blaming homosexual pedophilia supporters by calling their criminal behavior “minor sex abuse” rather than the sordid criminal homosexual grooming behavior that it truly is. The “mainstream media” went out if its way to avoid calling this sordid criminal behavior by its true definition–homosexual pedophilia grooming.
It is judaism’s eternal hatred of the Roman Catholic Church and Christianity that fuels the constant defamation of Catholicism and Christianity.
If only Christians would disavow their support of zionism and judaism and recognize the extreme hatred that jews have for Roman Catholicism and Christianity, this would be a much better world…
You’re wrong.
Some really original stuff, I must admit.
We haven’t heard anything like that even from Tulip (and especially not from Panzer D-doyen, HdC). I immediately had the feeling that the ‘Land of the Spearmen’ was a simple cork. This indirectly explains why Auschwitz had a swimming pool, a maternity ward, craft courses and football matches with the English national team.
WoW. This is really something. And I guessed that earlier when I said that there was a great similarity between panzers and Zionists, but I didn’t know where it came from. So, common ancestry. Very good.
Before, I didn’t understand why football was played against the English national team until I saw the following:
“These proto saxons or Isaac’s Sons are at the foundation of British and English speaking people everywhere today.”
So, here we are. This is practically the answer to almost all our questions. I am sure that Tulip, Isaac’s (Ikey-Kikey), g.g-daughter, will also be satisfied, because anything is better than being a Serbian kin.
After all, the kinship of Jews and Goths seems quite normal to me (and it also means that the Germans were really Goths, which I thought was a forgery).
If you finally tell us the meaning of kike, which is now no longer a derogatory term only for Jews but also for panzers and all English-speaking people, then you have really done a great job and finally explained some issues that have been lingering here for months if not years.
I proved you wrong about the jewish expulsions shlomo. Revealing yet again that you are a liar, as in my experience, jews as a people are a group of liars.
My people have known this for centuries. Your people are not to be trusted or believed….EVER.
https://archive.org/details/Luther_201906#:~:text=The%20Jews%20and%20their%20lies.%20by.%20Luther,
It is quite clear why you jews are constantly the ones demanding censorship. You post reveals the reason….you simply suck at debating real issues, and you cannot acknowledge the truth.
You are allergic to truth.
This is why “The jews and their lies” was removed by amazon. It is why “culture of critique” was removed by amazon. It is why “the myth of German villainy” was removed by amazon.
Because YOU JEWS can’t stand the truth….and those truths you are too lazy to try to refute, or can’t refute, you demand those truths be censored and burned at the stake.
Just the other day, I heard the jew john kerry insisting that (((democracy))) is too difficult when jews aren’t allowed to censor the truth.
Your people are truly pathetic, authoritarian, dictatorial, and neurotic. People get really tired of your behavior. THIS is why your people have been targeted throughout history. …your awful behavior.
As a wise man once said:
anti semitism=is a goy reaction to bad jewish behavior
(((sandy))) says
Then (((sandy))) says…
First they were allegedly never expelled…then a few posts later, he inadvertently admits he was lying.
Look shlomo, you are a pathological liar. Your lying rabbis and your lying parents likely fucked up your brain and made you the raving deceiver and hypocrite you are today. It’s not “funny”. It’s not “culture”. It’s sick and people tire of lying jews.
Please shlomo, get help. Stop believing in the ethnic cult your gullible ancestors fell for. Do better shlomo. Drop the yahweh sky ghost cult….start being consistent, fair, and begin being honest.
Abandon your ancestors and your tribe of liars and become a real human being. If enough of you do it, you can truly make the world a better place.
I’m trying to help here.
I found the first few paragraphs so tedious that I bailed out. Why does this article suck so bad?
Yes-the Judenreich IS the spearhead of the Western ‘Clash of Civilizations’ race and cultural war on the non-West, led by China. Western elites, and brainwashed and vicious cretins like YOU, are so deranged, in-bred and arrogant that they think that they can attack China, and win. And like most ‘Christian Zionazi’ slaves, you confuse the Torah with the Christian New Testament. The two are complete antitheses, and you are Judaic, never ‘Christian’. The arrogance and blood-lust says it all.
“Woody Allen is a scumbag jew child molester, marrying his adopted daughter.”
Now you’re just lying (typical of an apologist for the Whore of Babylon “church” based in Rome).
Woody Allen never molested anyone and he certainly didn’t marry his adopted daughter like you claimed. He did marry the daughter of his nutjob ex-girlfriend. (Woody Allen neither married Ms. Farrow nor adopted Soon Yi Previn.) And the brilliant Mr. Allen is still happily married to Soon Yi! Wishing both Woody and Soon Yi a happy and sweet New Year! Shanah Tovah!!!!
How is life in you IDF unit 8200 sh!thole?
I’ll bet it’s not too quiet as of late. Good!
I’ll bet that an Iranian missile will be sighted in on your HQ.
Wait for the bang.
lol
I’m hardly the first person to notice the obviously Jewish punim of (((Andrew Anglin))). There are whole videos about it! Here is just one:
Video Link
“How is life in you IDF unit 8200 sh!thole?”
Wow. Do you kiss (or more likely fellate) your parish priest with that mouth? For shame!
#TheWhoreOfBabylonLivesInRome
The idiot mullahs of Iran are lucky to even sight the next goat for their afternoon rendezvous.
And speaking of bangs (lol) . . . .
#OperationGrimBeeper
#HezbollahDeballed
”Nasty Nazi Nathan Cofnas”
Cofnas is highly philo-semitic and most likely a crypto-Talmudic Jew