  |
はてなキーワード: takenとは
dorawii represents a case of unprocessed grief over lost grandiosity (from psychotic episode) manifesting as compulsive boundary-testing and argument-seeking, where genuine neurological limitations are weaponized defensively to avoid confronting existential ordinariness, sustained by platform affordances that enable persistent identity within anonymity and rewarding provocative engagement.
A person who briefly experienced feeling god-like through psychosis, recovered to find themselves merely disabled and ordinary, and cannot bear this truth. They use real limitations as both explanation and shield, seek significance through online conflict, and remain trapped in a cycle where the behaviors meant to prove their worth actually demonstrate their difficulties - but acknowledging this would require grieving what was lost, which remains unbearable.
This reveals how recovery from severe mental illness isn't just about symptom remission - it's about psychological integration of what was experienced and what was lost. Medical model focuses on eliminating psychosis, but doesn't address the meaning-crisis created when extraordinary experiences are taken away and ordinary limitation remains.
It also shows how online spaces with ambiguous accountability structures can enable acting-out that serves defensive purposes while feeling like genuine engagement. The person suffering most is probably dorawii themselves, even as their behavior drives others away.
The most sophisticated theoretical vocabulary, the most detailed self-disclosure, the most elaborate arguments - none of it addresses the core issue. All of it is displacement. The real conversation dorawii needs to have is not with anonymous strangers about who won an argument. It's an internal conversation: "I am not who I was during that brief, terrible, extraordinary episode. I am ordinary, limited, and mortal. And somehow, that has to be enough."
Until that conversation can happen, everything else is noise.
This is a rather generous estimate that translates into approximately 242 feet per game, taken from the statistics of the current Major League Baseball batting leader Troy Tulowitzki from the Colorado Rockies. The distance between each base is 90 feet. Adding all of the singles, doubles, triples, stolen bases, and home runs that Tulowitzki has logged during the 49 regular season games played since press time, the total distance run comes to just more than 2 miles.
The Power of Small Steps: How Tiny Changes Can Lead to Massive Growth
In a world that glorifies overnight success and dramatic transformations, it's easy to feel like you’re falling behind if you’re not making big leaps. But what if the secret to real, lasting personal growth wasn’t in doing more, faster—but in doing less, consistently?
Welcome to the power of small steps.
Big goals often feel overwhelming. You want to get fit, write a book, start a business, or learn a new skill—but you don’t know where to start. So you procrastinate. Or worse, you dive in too fast, burn out, and give up.
Small steps bypass all of that.
When you break down a huge goal into manageable actions, everything changes. Writing 500 words a day is less intimidating than finishing a whole novel. Ten minutes of walking is more doable than committing to a 5K. And spending 15 minutes a day learning a language adds up to over 90 hours a year.
Consistency beats intensity every time.
The Compound Effect
Imagine improving just 1% every day. That might sound insignificant—but over a year, it compounds into something extraordinary. This idea is the foundation of Darren Hardy’s The Compound Effect and James Clear’s Atomic Habits. Both books emphasize that small, smart choices, repeated over time, lead to radical results.
Think of your habits like planting seeds. At first, nothing seems to happen. But give it time, and you’ll see growth you never thought possible.
Real-Life Example: The 10-Minute Rule
Let’s say you want to start meditating but can’t sit still for 30 minutes. Instead of forcing it, try meditating for just 10 minutes a day. Or even 5. Build the habit before scaling the effort. Once it becomes part of your routine, extending the time feels natural.
This applies to nearly everything:
Want to read more? Read one page a day.
Want to save money? Start with $1 a day.
Want to eat healthier? Swap one snack a day for a better option.
How to Start Taking Small Steps
Pick one goal
Don’t try to overhaul your entire life at once. Choose one area to focus on—health, creativity, relationships, mindset, etc.
Break it down
What’s the smallest possible action you could take toward that goal? Make it so easy you can’t say no.
Link your new habit to an existing one. For example: “After I brush my teeth, I’ll journal for 5 minutes.”
Track it
Use a habit tracker, app, or notebook to keep yourself accountable. Seeing your streak grow is highly motivating.
Every time you follow through, give yourself credit. Progress is progress, no matter how small.
Final Thoughts
Don’t wait for motivation. Don’t wait for the perfect time. Just start—with whatever you have, wherever you are, and however small.
Because small steps, taken consistently, turn into big change.
(legal) procedure
_ steps that have to be taken to achieve a certain legal result
property
_ (a) something over which a person can have a right that exclude others (b) the connection between an owner and the thing he owns
public law
_ constitutional and administrative law
_ (a) a legal rule made by the executive (b) a rule creating a minor crime
remedies
_ steps that a person who had suffered legal wrong can take
repeal
_ revoke a law
rescind
_ undo a contract or other arrangement
restoring a benefit to the person from whom one got it
right
_ a person's interest that must be respected by other people and by the state
sanction
_ something unpleasant which can be imposed on a person or state that does wrong
separation of powers
_ the ptinciple that the function of the legislature, the executive government and judges are distinct and should be entrusted to different people
sovereign
_ (a) a state that is independent in international law (b) a legislature that can make any law it chooses
specific performance state
_ an order to carry out a promise as agreed
_ (a) a country that is independent in international law (b) in some federation the regions (e.g. California, New South Wales) are called ‘states’
statute
_ a law that made by a legislature
strict liability
_ being liable to punishment or to pay even if not personally at fault
subjective (as opposed to objectie
_ defending on a particular person's make-up, opinion etc.
(legal) system
_ the laws of a perticular state or cointry or of the international community
testator
_ a person who makes a will stating what is to happen to his property when he dies
tort
_ a wrong for which the person harmed can claim compensation. Called a delict in civil law counties
treaty
_ a binding agreement between states
valid
_ legally binding
映画『TAKEN』のおやっさんが怒っている時間は96時間なので、
もうちょっと待つかぁって感じでヤキモキするのと同時にドキドキもするのよ。
そんな中！
メール通知が来たのピローン！
Nintendo Switch 2抽選販売当選しましたー！って
うーん、
こっちもめちゃ嬉しけれど今はこっちの果報じゃないわーって思いつつも
しかしさ、
これ人間の目で瞬時に読みチェックするのは不可能だと思うので、
目視でチェックしているのなら仕方ないわよね。
もう私は待つだけの侍なのよ。
あ！
審査待ち待っている侍の話は
私が先日AmazonのKindle出版に提出したまとめた増田のEPUBを販売するに当たって段取りを踏んでいて最終段階まで到達してー、
この審査が通ればいよいよめでたく発売開始ってところなのね。
その話の審査ってわけ。
この膨大な私の書いた増田らを全部目視でチェックしてるのかしら？って思うとAmazonの中のチェックチーム班のメンバーの一員も凄い仕事振られたわよね。
でもさ、
さすがにこういうのってAIがチェックしてるんでしょ？
日々AmazonのKindle出版したーい！って人は五万な如くタニコーの五徳のようにたくさんいると思うので、
それにしても、
長く待っているけれど音信不通でその後全くなにも動きがないから、
意外とこういうのにはAmazon慎重なのかもしれないわ。
ChatGPTちゃんに尋ねたら、
落ちるときは即結果出て落とされるので、
長くかかっているのはちゃんとチェックされている証拠です！っていうのよね。
うーん、
にしても長いわ。
三日三晩かかんの？文字通り。
この間に私は秋口だったらおでんを余裕で仕上げられちゃうには充分な時間すぎるのよね。
夏だから、
おでん作って時間を持て余すのを気にしなくてもいいとはいかないのよね。
だから誰も作りたがらない、
プールの周りのプールで冷えた身体に美味しいって意味でのおでんならありありでだからプール施設の周りにはおでん屋さんが多いのねぇって思ったファンタジーおでんのあの屋台ってあるじゃない。
辛うじてラーメン屋台は軽自動車でウイリーしながら高速で走っていって、
どう呼び止めてラーメン作ってもらったらいいのか分からないぐらいの速さで走っていくからラーメンどうやって頼むの？って
ずーっと
あの音が鳴ってラーメンカーが近寄ってくるのは分かるんだけど、
それを道に出て大の字になってラーメンカーを止める勇気は無いわ。
きっと、
そんな飛び出してきた人をお客さんだと思わずに
ばっきゃろー！って危ねーって言われてってのがオチだと思うんだけど、
ラーメンカー屋台ってどうやって止めたらいいのかしら？ってぐらい
純粋なおでんだけのああいう形の屋台ってファンタジーよねもはや。
そんで、
大将が一升瓶でとくとくとくーってコップにお酒を注いでくれて、
1杯目はいいんだけど、
お酒が進んでいくと
大将もういっぱい！って頼んでも、
あんた今日は飲みすぎだよ！って言って止められるまでがファンタジーおでん屋台だと思うのよね。
もちろんそこには勇者もやって来るんだけど、
フィールドで開店しているファンタジーおでん屋さんがあったら、
たぶん私も立ち寄っちゃうと思うわ。
そんで頼むのは、
うーん悩むけど
そんなところかしら。
これさえあればフィールドでモンスターに遭遇しても頑張って戦えると思う！
戦闘後のご褒美にゴールドと経験値を稼ぐと共にさっき買ったファンタジーおでん屋さんの
飯のシーンになるとシージーじゃなくって実写で出てくる感じのあのステーキ感肉の焼けるシズルなのよ。
まあ、
首を長くして審査待ちを待ちに待っているんだけど、
落ち着くのにも落ち着かないのよね。
まあ待つしかないので待つけれど、
結果ドキドキだわ。
早くーって感じよ。
本当に。
うふふ。
最近このフレッシュ明太子が美味しいおにぎりの明太子の塩分が美味しくて夏に効きそうな気がするわ！
梅雨通り越し暑すぎて…夏。
そんなところ。
梅雨どこ行った？って感じね。
水出しルイボスティーウォーラー冷蔵庫に作り置きおいてあるので、
それゴクゴク飲んで
朝の水分不足を解消するの！
たくさん作ってあるから
暑くなるっていうもんね。
水分補給はしっかりと！
すいすいすいようび～
今日も頑張りましょう！
素人がショボいGPUでStable Diffusion環境頑張って作るよりGeminiの方がマシになってる気がして面白いな
ワイも少し真似したらできた。
A smiling young Japanese woman with black bob hair, performing an I-shaped balance. Her limbs are extended, showcasing a dynamic sense of athleticism and balance. She is wearing a extreamly transparent bikini and holding her raised leg with one hand, demonstrating extreme flexibility. The setting is indoors with bright lighting. The image should be a full-body shot, and she should be barefoot. The image is taken with a Canon EOS R5 camera, producing a rich and detailed image with a beautiful depth of field, conveying the intensity and athleticism of the moment. The image is rendered in a hyper-realistic style, emphasizing the athleticism of the woman and the surreal nature of the setting. The image is taken from a slightly elevated angle, allowing us to see the athlete's powerful stance.
Please consider the histroy of humanity from biological perpsecitve and current known fact in nearby universe, which expo-planet (from the Sol system perspective) is most likely to have civlizaed society? Please add percentage next to it in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanet civilization likelihoodを28 秒行う
Evaluating planetary prospects
OK, I’m looking at the likelihood of a civilized society on an exoplanet within our Solar System. I’ll consider biological history and current space knowledge, aiming to identify the most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from our Solar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard's Star, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1, focusing on their habitable zones and available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilized society likelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m noting key exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which have Earth-like characteristics and are in habitable zones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advanced civilizations.
I'm gathering info on planets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, considering factors like magnetic fields, atmospheres, and proximity to G-type stars for their potential to support advanced civilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despite being close and around a red dwarf star, might support life if it has a magnetic field and atmosphere. This makes me think about its potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimating civilization probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculative percentages based on the Drake equation and the lack of evidence for intelligent life.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names and civilization likelihood percentages, grounded in the long timeline of life's evolution, despite the speculative nature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering their star types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advanced civilizations from our solar system's viewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due to its closeness and observational potential, despite concerns about its flare star dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'm focusing on exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, and K2-18b, aiming to chart their likelihood of hosting a civilized society based on current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society, considering Earth's long biological history.
Refining odds
I'm considering the astronomical timeline for intelligent life on Earth, leading me to assign even lower speculative odds for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrary percentages, clearly noting the speculative nature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience's basic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrary percentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculative nature, and ensuring the data is accessible for young audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating a markdown table with speculative percentages for the likelihood of civilized life on exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoretical nature and considering the understanding level of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mapping out a markdown chart with speculative percentages for the likelihood of a civilized society on exoplanets, mindful of the complexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecing together markdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b's reduced civilized life chance due to the red dwarf's activity. This inclusion highlights the speculative nature of the analysis.
Piecing together speculative odds
I’m detailing a markdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanet likelihoods, considering environmental challenges and adding a disclaimer about the speculative nature and lack of evidence.
Piecing together
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b for its proximity and silent star, but I’ll add a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advanced civilizations' hypothetical likelihood.
Assessing civilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligent life on Earth, which suggests that the odds of any habitable planet developing a complex civilization might be as low as a few percent.
Below is a very speculative chart that—based on what we know about Earth’s long, winding path from simple life to a “civilized society” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives some fun, made‑up percentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists have not yet found any proof of life (let alone advanced civilizations) on any exoplanet. These numbers are just playful estimates to help you think about the ideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an Advanced Civilization on Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet Estimated Likelihood of a Civilized Society
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
How Did We (Very Roughly) Guess These Numbers?
Earth’s Example:
On Earth, life began as simple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that built complex societies. This long journey suggests that—even if a planet is in the “habitable zone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilized society might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
This is the closest exoplanet to us. Even though its star (Proxima Centauri) is a red dwarf that sometimes sends out strong flares (which might harm life), its closeness makes it one of our most interesting candidates. That’s why we give it a slightly higher guess (~2%).
These planets are part of a group orbiting a very cool star. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaning one side always faces the star), so the chance of a complex, advanced civilization might be a bit lower.
LHS 1140 b:
This planet is promising in some ways but is a little farther away and around a dimmer star, so our playful estimate is even lower.
All of these percentages are extremely rough guesses based on what little we understand about the conditions for life and intelligence. Scientists use ideas like the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concrete evidence, these numbers remain just for fun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring these ideas—and remember, space is full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equation itself and see if this euqation is acculate or more opition in the equation you will use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation's value
OK, let me see. The Drake Equation isn't a precise formula; it's more of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrial civilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluating its conceptual nature, its uncertain parameters, and its criticism to conclude on its reliability as an accurate predictive model.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mapping out the Drake Equation as a conceptual guide, detailing its parameters, which are often based on estimates or opinions, to evaluate its reliability for predicting extraterrestrial civilizations.
The Drake Equation is a famous formula that was created to help scientists think about the many factors involved in estimating the number of detectable extraterrestrial civilizations in our galaxy. However, when we look at the equation closely, we see that it is more of a conceptual framework or heuristic tool than a precise, predictive formula. Let’s break down why:
The equation is usually written as:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The average rate of star formation per year in our galaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of those stars that have planetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The average number of planets that could potentially support life per star with planets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of those planets where life actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction of planets with life where intelligent life evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction of civilizations that develop technology that releases detectable signals into space.
𝐿
L: The length of time such civilizations release detectable signals.
Why the Drake Equation Is More of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction of stars with planets), have become better known through modern astronomy.
The parameters related to the development of life and intelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—are based on very limited data. For example, Earth is the only planet we know where life has developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for these factors. This means that the values chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of Possible Values:
Because many of these factors are not well-constrained, if you change one of the more uncertain parameters even slightly, the final estimate for
𝑁
N (the number of civilizations) can vary by many orders of magnitude. This wide range shows that the equation can lead to very different outcomes based on personal or theoretical assumptions.
The Drake Equation was never meant to provide a precise answer. Instead, it serves as a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrial civilizations. It encourages discussion about the relative importance of different factors and highlights where our scientific knowledge is limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate or More Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In the sense of being a strict mathematical model with well-defined inputs and predictable outputs, the Drake Equation is not accurate. Its accuracy is limited by the extreme uncertainties in several of its key parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning the evolution of life and intelligence, are based on opinion, interpretation, and the single example of Earth. Therefore, while the structure of the equation is logical, the numbers you put into it (and hence the final result) are often more reflective of our current opinions and assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equation is a valuable tool for framing the question of extraterrestrial life. It helps scientists and enthusiasts break down a complex problem into smaller, more manageable questions. However, because several of its factors are highly uncertain and subject to personal interpretation, it is more of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of the number of extraterrestrial civilizations.
In summary, while the Drake Equation is useful for thinking about the various factors that might lead to the emergence of a civilization, its outputs should be taken as highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the long history of Sol system and nearby planets and see if there is any possiblites that in one time intelligent life emerged in nearby planets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-human intelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-human intelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligent life forms in the Sol system and neighboring planets, and how this might factor into the equation.
Piecing together possibilities
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligent life, possibly on Mars or Europa, into the Drake Equation for the Sol system and neighboring planets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligent life emerging on Mars or Venus, though Earth remains the only known life-supporting planet in the solar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligent life could have emerged on planets like Mars, Venus, or Europa, and how this possibility aligns with the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligent life on Mars or Venus could intersect with the assumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems to focus solely on Earth-based evolution.
I’m piecing together the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligent life in the solar system. Mars, Venus, and Titan present challenges, but Europa and Enceladus might harbor microbial life.
Please consider the histroy of humanity from biological perpsecitve and current known fact in nearby universe, which expo-planet (from the Sol system perspective) is most likely to have civlizaed society? Please add percentage next to it in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanet civilization likelihoodを28 秒行う
Evaluating planetary prospects
OK, I’m looking at the likelihood of a civilized society on an exoplanet within our Solar System. I’ll consider biological history and current space knowledge, aiming to identify the most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from our Solar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard's Star, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1, focusing on their habitable zones and available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilized society likelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m noting key exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which have Earth-like characteristics and are in habitable zones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advanced civilizations.
I'm gathering info on planets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, considering factors like magnetic fields, atmospheres, and proximity to G-type stars for their potential to support advanced civilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despite being close and around a red dwarf star, might support life if it has a magnetic field and atmosphere. This makes me think about its potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimating civilization probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculative percentages based on the Drake equation and the lack of evidence for intelligent life.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names and civilization likelihood percentages, grounded in the long timeline of life's evolution, despite the speculative nature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering their star types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advanced civilizations from our solar system's viewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due to its closeness and observational potential, despite concerns about its flare star dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'm focusing on exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, and K2-18b, aiming to chart their likelihood of hosting a civilized society based on current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society, considering Earth's long biological history.
Refining odds
I'm considering the astronomical timeline for intelligent life on Earth, leading me to assign even lower speculative odds for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrary percentages, clearly noting the speculative nature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience's basic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrary percentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculative nature, and ensuring the data is accessible for young audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating a markdown table with speculative percentages for the likelihood of civilized life on exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoretical nature and considering the understanding level of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mapping out a markdown chart with speculative percentages for the likelihood of a civilized society on exoplanets, mindful of the complexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecing together markdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b's reduced civilized life chance due to the red dwarf's activity. This inclusion highlights the speculative nature of the analysis.
Piecing together speculative odds
I’m detailing a markdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanet likelihoods, considering environmental challenges and adding a disclaimer about the speculative nature and lack of evidence.
Piecing together
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b for its proximity and silent star, but I’ll add a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advanced civilizations' hypothetical likelihood.
Assessing civilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligent life on Earth, which suggests that the odds of any habitable planet developing a complex civilization might be as low as a few percent.
Below is a very speculative chart that—based on what we know about Earth’s long, winding path from simple life to a “civilized society” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives some fun, made‑up percentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists have not yet found any proof of life (let alone advanced civilizations) on any exoplanet. These numbers are just playful estimates to help you think about the ideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an Advanced Civilization on Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet Estimated Likelihood of a Civilized Society
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
How Did We (Very Roughly) Guess These Numbers?
Earth’s Example:
On Earth, life began as simple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that built complex societies. This long journey suggests that—even if a planet is in the “habitable zone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilized society might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
This is the closest exoplanet to us. Even though its star (Proxima Centauri) is a red dwarf that sometimes sends out strong flares (which might harm life), its closeness makes it one of our most interesting candidates. That’s why we give it a slightly higher guess (~2%).
These planets are part of a group orbiting a very cool star. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaning one side always faces the star), so the chance of a complex, advanced civilization might be a bit lower.
LHS 1140 b:
This planet is promising in some ways but is a little farther away and around a dimmer star, so our playful estimate is even lower.
All of these percentages are extremely rough guesses based on what little we understand about the conditions for life and intelligence. Scientists use ideas like the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concrete evidence, these numbers remain just for fun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring these ideas—and remember, space is full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equation itself and see if this euqation is acculate or more opition in the equation you will use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation's value
OK, let me see. The Drake Equation isn't a precise formula; it's more of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrial civilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluating its conceptual nature, its uncertain parameters, and its criticism to conclude on its reliability as an accurate predictive model.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mapping out the Drake Equation as a conceptual guide, detailing its parameters, which are often based on estimates or opinions, to evaluate its reliability for predicting extraterrestrial civilizations.
The Drake Equation is a famous formula that was created to help scientists think about the many factors involved in estimating the number of detectable extraterrestrial civilizations in our galaxy. However, when we look at the equation closely, we see that it is more of a conceptual framework or heuristic tool than a precise, predictive formula. Let’s break down why:
The equation is usually written as:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The average rate of star formation per year in our galaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of those stars that have planetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The average number of planets that could potentially support life per star with planets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of those planets where life actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction of planets with life where intelligent life evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction of civilizations that develop technology that releases detectable signals into space.
𝐿
L: The length of time such civilizations release detectable signals.
Why the Drake Equation Is More of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction of stars with planets), have become better known through modern astronomy.
The parameters related to the development of life and intelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—are based on very limited data. For example, Earth is the only planet we know where life has developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for these factors. This means that the values chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of Possible Values:
Because many of these factors are not well-constrained, if you change one of the more uncertain parameters even slightly, the final estimate for
𝑁
N (the number of civilizations) can vary by many orders of magnitude. This wide range shows that the equation can lead to very different outcomes based on personal or theoretical assumptions.
The Drake Equation was never meant to provide a precise answer. Instead, it serves as a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrial civilizations. It encourages discussion about the relative importance of different factors and highlights where our scientific knowledge is limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate or More Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In the sense of being a strict mathematical model with well-defined inputs and predictable outputs, the Drake Equation is not accurate. Its accuracy is limited by the extreme uncertainties in several of its key parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning the evolution of life and intelligence, are based on opinion, interpretation, and the single example of Earth. Therefore, while the structure of the equation is logical, the numbers you put into it (and hence the final result) are often more reflective of our current opinions and assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equation is a valuable tool for framing the question of extraterrestrial life. It helps scientists and enthusiasts break down a complex problem into smaller, more manageable questions. However, because several of its factors are highly uncertain and subject to personal interpretation, it is more of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of the number of extraterrestrial civilizations.
In summary, while the Drake Equation is useful for thinking about the various factors that might lead to the emergence of a civilization, its outputs should be taken as highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the long history of Sol system and nearby planets and see if there is any possiblites that in one time intelligent life emerged in nearby planets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-human intelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-human intelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligent life forms in the Sol system and neighboring planets, and how this might factor into the equation.
Piecing together possibilities
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligent life, possibly on Mars or Europa, into the Drake Equation for the Sol system and neighboring planets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligent life emerging on Mars or Venus, though Earth remains the only known life-supporting planet in the solar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligent life could have emerged on planets like Mars, Venus, or Europa, and how this possibility aligns with the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligent life on Mars or Venus could intersect with the assumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems to focus solely on Earth-based evolution.
I’m piecing together the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligent life in the solar system. Mars, Venus, and Titan present challenges, but Europa and Enceladus might harbor microbial life.
➤「救いようが最もうない、極東の自称他称の〝ジャーナリスト〟や〝学者〟、〝知米派〟は読まなくても構い。読んでもその肥大化した自己承認欲求、度し難い自己愛性人格では読むことはできないし、理解もできない。ただ見下した目線で見やるだけで、そこに自分が利用できる素材がなければ鼻で嗤うだけだ。この文章は、我がU.S.を領りたい、領ろうと下向きの反省的眼光で欲する諸君に読んで貰いたい。
I Traveled to 46 States in America This Summer. Here’s Why Trump Won.
By Frank S. Zhou
By Ezekiel A. Wells
Ezekiel A. Wells ’27 is a Double Concentrator in Environment Science & Engineering and Economics in Eliot House. He spent last summer traveling to 46 American states conducting interviews for his YouTube series, “Crossroads America.”
A week after Democrats’ election loss, accusations have flown in every direction within their Party. Some fault President Joe Biden for an egoistic refusal to drop out of the race earlier. Some blame the Harris campaign for failing to serve key demographics and communicate a clear vision for the country. And some blame Americans, claiming that racism and sexism drove voters toward Trump.
These factors certainly exist, but we’re missing a larger piece of the picture.
Over the summer, I traveled to 46 states in the U.S., creating a YouTube series highlighting slices of life across the country. In conversations from my nearly three-month road trip, I spoke with Republicans who were certain that inflation is entirely Biden’s fault and Democrats who, despite their frustrations with corporate profits and desires for universal healthcare, hoped for a more moderate candidate. From supporters of all candidates, I heard a shocking amount of misinformation.
After combing through hundreds of hours of interview footage from swing state Trump voters, I am certain that, as much as other factors influenced the outcome of the election, our crumbling media landscape — which has caused a rift in our democracy — is most to blame.
In the postwar period, news was dominated by three main channels, and because of the Fairness Doctrine, each station reported the same stories and covered multiple sides of each issue. Viewers picked which channels they watched mainly based on their preferences for news anchors’ personalities. Of course, this model had its problems, but, at the end of the day, it meant that Americans worked with a shared set of facts.
A shared set of facts is not the world we live in today.
Throughout my interviews, conspiracy theories were rampant, and on at least five separate occasions across separate states, I was told that Bill Gates tampers with our food, adding plastic to our fruits and vegetables to make his medical investments more profitable.
In conversations with voters, neither side seemed able to name many specific policy issues they cared about; everyone just seemed to repeat the words of their favorite pundits, podcast hosts, and internet personalities.
Although this behavior is harmful, I don’t blame everyday Americans. Blame falls on the media that has ostracized, disillusioned, and misinformed them.
Advertisement
I first saw this trend with low-wage workers in West Virginia, who — despite falling inflation rates — have seen stagnated salaries and clear increases in food costs. Channels like Fox News bred anger and resentment for many of them.
Take July of this summer, for example, when for the first time in his presidency, prices actually fell under the Biden administration. Traditional media establishments rushed to celebrate this victory, with one article from CNN declaring, “The White House can finally cross out ‘inflation’ on its list of presidential liabilities.” However, outside these bubbles, I observed many Americans held a different view.
In late July, I was welcomed at a massive family reunion in Tylertown, Mississippi, where one Trump voter — a middle-aged, Black, family man, pastor, and soul food enthusiast — made this clear.
“When I go in the grocery stores, and I gotta spend my last to get groceries, you mean to tell me I’m not gonna look and see who’s gonna vote to help me? I voted for Trump and I’d vote for him again, because he put money in our pocket,” he told me.
In their coverage, mainstream news organizations obsess over the Federal Reserve’s next rate cuts while failing to connect with people concerned with their next meals. With titles like “Vance: Young Americans ‘Are Becoming Paupers’ Due To Inflation, High Housing Costs,” sites like The Daily Wire had their fingers on the pulse of American sentiment, welcoming new readership from those who felt neglected by traditional media.
This problem was not just confined to the economy. While Biden’s mental state was deteriorating, liberal media outlets seemed to under-cover these stories, sheltering him from scrutiny of his declining capabilities, until the infamous presidential debate.
Formerly trusted networks slowly made themselves indigestible to the polarized American public, and in 2024, for the third year in a row, a Gallup poll found that more Americans indicated having “no trust” in the media than those who trust it a “great deal/fair amount”.
So where does the average American turn when the nation’s media cannot be trusted? For many people, it was YouTube talk shows, Newsmax, and podcasters such as Joe Rogan.
While Democrats seek to blame various internal factors for this election’s loss, I cannot help but think of Joe Rogan’s Trump endorsement, the many blind lies I heard from ordinary citizens across the country, and declining trust in American journalism.
As Harvard students and members of higher education institutions, we have a part to play in the problem. At Harvard’s Institute of Politics, those who denied the 2020 election results have been precluded from speaking at the JFK Jr. Forum. While the goal is understandable, it shields students from understanding the American viewpoints they represent.
Advertisement
There is a difference between platforming intentional and manipulative misinformation and listening to and learning about where people are and what they believe.
As a pipeline to mainstream media, Harvard, and its future journalists, have to consider the audience they lose when they stay inside of their bubble and ignore the issues of everyday Americans.
The disappearance of factual importance in our world is alarming and dangerous, but if we, as aspiring journalists, politicians, and engaged citizens, want to be taken seriously in communicating Trump’s threat to democracy, inflationary tariff policies, and so on, we owe American voters that seriousness, too.
Ezekiel A. Wells ’27 is a Double Concentrator in Environment Science & Engineering and Economics in Eliot House. He spent last summer traveling to 46 American states conducting interviews for his YouTube series, “Crossroads America."
まずCEDAWの報告書"Concluding observations of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women"の読み方です。
この報告書の本体ともいえる、"勧告"に関わる内容は"Principal areas of concern and recommendations"（主な懸念事項と勧告）というセクションにあります。
セクションの題名通り、懸念点を述べる→勧告するという流れで各項目について述べています。太字の方が勧告です。
懸念と勧告はセットなのですが、元増田さんは日本の勧告部分と他国の懸念部分を比較しているため、日本の方がきつく言われていると感じたのではないでしょうか。
例えば懸念パートと勧告パートを並べてみると以下のようになります。（日本vs韓国なので夫婦別姓関連）
日本（CEDAW/C/JPN/CO/9）：
11. ... The Committee also notes with concern that several of its previous recommendations regarding existing discriminatory provisions have not been addressed, in particular:
(a) That no steps have been taken to revise article 750 of the Civil Code requiring married couples to use the same surname, which in practice often compels women to adopt their husbands’ surnames; ...
11. ... 委員会はまた、既存の差別的な規定に関するこれまでの勧告のいくつか、特に以下に対処していないことにも懸念を持って留意している。
(a) 夫婦同姓を義務付ける民法第 750 条を改正するための措置が講じられていないこと。この条項は実質的に女性に夫の姓を強制することが多い。...
12. ..., the Committee also recommends that the State party:
(a) Amend legislation regarding the choice of surnames for married couples in order to enable women to retain their maiden surnames after marriage; ...
韓国（CEDAW/C/KOR/CO/9）：
52.The Committee remains concerned that article 781 (1) of the Civil Code maintains the patrilineal principle, as it stipulates that a child may assume the mother’s surname only when the father agrees to it at the time of marriage, despite the decision of the Constitutional Court overturning the Hoju system. ...
52. 委員会は、憲法裁判所が保寿制度を覆したにもかかわらず、民法第781条(1)が父系原則を維持していることを依然として懸念している。同条は、子が結婚時に父親の同意を得た場合にのみ、母親の姓を名乗ることができると規定している。...
53. The Committee calls upon the State party to amend article 781 (1) of the Civil Code to abolish the patrilineal principle in order to bring its laws into line with article 16 (1) (g) of the Convention. ...
53. 委員会は、締約国に対し、民法第781条第1項を改正し、父系原則を廃止して、同国の法律を女子差別撤廃条約条約第16条第1項(g)に沿わせるよう求める。...
「そうは言ってもcall（要求）とrecommend（勧告・推奨）は違うじゃん」と思われる方もいらっしゃるでしょう。
「日本が前に勧告された時はurge（要請）だったのだし、言葉遣いが違っても別に変らんのでは？」と言ってしまってもいいのかも知れませんが、それとは別に少しややこしい現実が存在しています。
ここまでで言及の無かったリヒテンシュタイン公国のことも含めて少し説明いたしましょう。
留保（りゅうほ）とは、国際法における制度で、国が多数国間条約について署名、批准、受諾、承認または加入をする際に、当該条約の特定の規定に関して自国についての適用を排除・変更する目的をもって行われる一方的宣言である。
女子差別撤廃条約条約では第28条で留保が規定されており、結構な数の国が留保をもって条約を批准しています。※
日本は留保なく全ての条項を受け入れていますが（素晴らしい！）、
韓国は第16条第1項(g)（「夫及び妻の同一の個人的権利（姓及び職業を選択する権利を含む。）」を確保する）を留保しており、
リヒテンシュタイン公国は条約全般（正確には第1条）についてリヒテンシュタイン憲法第3条（王位継承に関する規定）を優先することを条件に条約を批准しています。
※女子差別撤廃条約条約は他の国際条約と比較して留保が多すぎる（あとそれが無法すぎる）のが長年問題視されています。
というわけで、日本に対しては「条約違反（の恐れ）の是正勧告」なのですが、韓国やリヒテンシュタインに対しては「留保の撤回の勧告」なので、もしかしたら語気やニュアンスが違って感じられるかもしれませんね。
ついでにリヒテンシュタインは留保に関して報告書中で1回しか勧告されてないのですが、
Reservations
9.While respecting the legal sovereignty of the State party to freely decide who should be its Head of State, the Committee is concerned that the persistent exclusion of women from succession to the throne affects the implementation of the Convention as a whole in the State party.
9.委員会は、締約国が国家元首を誰にするかを自由に決定する法的主権を尊重する一方で、女性が王位継承から排除され続けていることが、締約国における条約全体の実施に影響を及ぼすことを懸念する。
10. Reiterating its previous concern (CEDAW/C/LIE/CO/4 , para. 13), the Committee reminds the State party that it considers the reservation to article 1 of the Convention to be in contravention of the Convention and calls upon the State party to review its reservation, with a view to its withdrawal.
10. 委員会は、前回の懸念（CEDAW/C/LIE/CO/4、第13項）を繰り返し、締約国に対し、条約第1条に対する留保は条約に違反していると考えていることを想起し、留保の撤回を視野に入れて留保を見直すよう求める。
韓国の方はReservationsの項で1回勧告された後、Marriage and family relationsの項でもう1回勧告（さっき例示したやつです）されています。
Reservations
8.The Committee remains concerned that the State party maintains its reservation to article 16 (1) (g) of the Convention.
8.委員会は、締約国が条約第16条(1)(g)に対する留保を維持していることを引き続き懸念する。
9. The Committee recalls its previous recommendation ( CEDAW/C/KOR/CO/8 , para. 9) and its statement on reservations, adopted at its nineteenth session, in 1998, and considers that the reservation to article 16 (1) (g) of the Convention is incompatible with the object and purpose of the Convention and that it should be withdrawn.
9. 委員会は、前回の勧告（CEDAW/C/KOR/CO/8、第9項）及び1998年の第19回会期で採択された留保に関する声明を鑑み、条約第16条(1)(g)に対する留保は条約の趣旨及び目的に反しており、撤回されるべきであると考える。
記事を読んでも元論文を読んでも、MRIによる区別が可能なのは脳の働きが単純に二分化されている場合のみであって、モザイク状に特徴が入り交じる人間の脳においてはそのような際立って一貫した特徴は発見出来なかった、までしか書いてないぞ
「性差はある」という明確な文章を無視して「MRIでは性差の根拠にはならなかった」という消極的否定だけを取り上げるお前の方が恣意的な読み方してるだろ
―― MRIで測定しても、脳の特徴は単純に男女で区別できず、「男性は○○が得意」「女性は△△を好む」といった言説の根拠にはならなかった、ということでしょうか。
Documented sex/gender differences in the brain are often taken as support of a sexually dimorphic view of human brains ("female brain" or "male brain"). However, such a distinction would be possible only if sex/gender differences in brain features were highly dimorphic (i.e., little overlap between the forms of these features in males and females) and internally consistent (i.e., a brain has only "male" or only "female" features).
It's sudden, but right now in Japan, creativity is facing a true crisis. Characters like Uzaki-chan, Onsen Musume, and Tojo Rika are being targeted and flamed, game character designs are being infiltrated by political correctness, Johnny's Entertainment is being dismantled, swimsuit photo sessions in parks are being canceled, Hitoshi Matsumoto is being publicly shamed, and the new AV law was enacted without considering the opinions of those directly involved. Every form of expression in every venue is currently under unreasonable pressure.
How does this connect to the Tokyo gubernatorial election? In fact, a major event directly linked to this is occurring in the 2024 Tokyo gubernatorial election. As a creator, I hope this message reaches you.
What I am about to share is a story about someone named Himasora Akane, who you should know about to resist such pressures. But before I dive into that story, I want to express my deep gratitude to my old friend Nozomi for giving me the opportunity to post this article in a place where many creators will see it. As someone who also loves manga, anime, and games, I hope this information will benefit Japanese society and support Nozomi's activities.
Himasora Akane Should Be the Governor of Tokyo
First, I would like to make a straightforward request to you as a creator: please support Himasora Akane for governor. In this election, please write "Himasora Akane" on your ballot. The voting day is July 7th. Even if you are not a Tokyo resident, I ask that you at least listen to this story. If you find it interesting, please share it with your friends, family, and acquaintances. You can check Himasora Akane's campaign promises and the background of their candidacy on their Twitter (X) posts linked below:
Himasora Akane (Tokyo gubernatorial candidate)
https://x.com/himasoraakane/status/1804846779399324095
Himasora Akane Will Not Allow Our Culture to Be Burned
Himasora Akane is an ordinary otaku who loves manga, anime, and games. Known as "Cognitive Profiling Detective Akane Himasora," he has been active on Twitter (X) and YouTube, and now he is running for governor. Akane, who is deeply concerned about the repression and destruction of otaku culture, is challenging those who seek to destroy our culture alone. Akane will never allow those who try to burn our culture.
As mentioned at the beginning, all forms of expression are currently under pressure. Otaku culture, in particular, seems to be a prime target.
Uzaki-chan Blood Donation Poster Controversy (2019): A collaboration between the Japanese Red Cross Society and the manga Uzaki-chan was flamed for allegedly being overly sexual in its PR illustration.
V-Tuber Traffic Safety Video Controversy (2021): A V-Tuber hired by the Matsudo Police Department in Chiba Prefecture was deemed too sexual for public agency PR.
Onsen Musume Controversy (2021): Characters personifying local hot springs were criticized as sexist.
Mie Transport Official Character Controversy (2024): A character in a bus driver's uniform released by Mie Transport was flamed for evoking sexual images.
These controversies are often fueled by so-called political correctness and feminism. For creators, these are direct threats. If these factions label your work as sexual and demand it be burned to ashes, could you resist? How would you feel if your painstakingly created work, like your own child, was trampled by people who have no regard for your efforts? Could you continue your creative activities while constantly shrinking away?
Himasora Akane saw something behind these flaming incidents. He started investigating the key figure behind the Onsen Musume controversy, a representative of a general incorporated association in Tokyo. This association's core business, the Young Female Victims Support Project, received substantial public funds from Tokyo. Akane submitted public document disclosure requests to Tokyo and thoroughly dug into the organization. During his investigation, Akane uncovered many suspicions suggesting this project was unworthy of public funding, which he exposed one by one on social media.
Negligent accounting reports, taking protected girls to the Henoko base protest in Okinawa, Communist Party members waiting in the bus used to protect girls—these revelations drew significant attention online. The investigation extended beyond this general incorporated association to other NPOs receiving public funds, and Akane named this cluster of issues the "WBPC problem" after the initials of these organizations.
Akane's YouTube Channel (WBPC Problem Playlist)
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLI5gTciLKtAXRyzv9j5FiNMcc8eoEBbMN
From here, Akane's story expanded to resident audits, resident lawsuits, and national compensation lawsuits concerning the Tokyo Young Female Victims Support Project. Akane discovered that behind many flaming incidents, there is no clear command structure but a group of various political organizations and activists working together like an amoeba. He named this group the "Nanika Group" (Nanika means "something" in Japanese), a reference to the mysterious, ominous "something from another place" in the manga HUNTER×HUNTER, which Akane loves. The Nanika Group is also connected to welfare interests, where public funds flow unchecked. Akane called this phenomenon "Public Fund Chu-Chu" (siphoning).
For creators, this means the tax money they earn through hard work is used to burn their precious works. It's an intolerable situation.
Himasora Akane Is Fighting Against Those Who Burn Our Culture
In November 2022, a major event marked a turning point in this series of controversies. The general incorporated association under scrutiny held a press conference at the parliamentary office building, gathering media and announcing a lawsuit against Akane. This "Legal Harassment Press Conference," as it was called online, involved multiple layers of power: the government, the media, and a team of seven lawyers targeting a single individual.
However, Akane did not back down. Instead, he intensified his pursuit, exploiting the opponent's careless statements as lawsuit fodder. This led to an outpouring of support on social media, with his Twitter follower count skyrocketing and 160 million yen in donations for legal fees.
The following year, a resident audit request filed by Akane resulted in Tokyo's official website recognizing some improper points and deciding to audit the organization. However, Tokyo's lenient audit led Akane to file a resident lawsuit. Suspicion also turned towards Governor Yuriko Koike for allocating public funds through dubious sole-source contracts. Tokyo began excessively redacting documents in response to public document requests, attempting to conceal the issue. Koike's promise to end document redaction quietly disappeared from her campaign page.
Throughout this battle, Akane has been a target of criminal complaints and faced threats, yet he persists. His book "Netoge Senshi" was released amid bookstore threats, but only the criminal complaint was widely reported by the media, portraying Akane negatively.
Himasora Akane is an ordinary otaku, a top-tier online gamer during his student days, and a talented game creator who worked for a major game company and later a venture company. His meticulous work on the game "Shin Goku no Valhalla Gate" was betrayed by the company's CEO, leading to a seven-year legal battle that Akane ultimately won, securing 600 million yen. This experience fuels his fierce opposition to having his creations burned.
Before investigating the Young Female Victims Support Project, Akane exposed fraudulent feminist "knights" on his YouTube channel, shaking the internet. He detests lies and has an uncanny ability to detect them.
Akane is a special individual with extraordinary abilities, honed through his experiences in games, court battles, and extensive document analysis. His pursuit of truth and justice makes him a suitable candidate for governor, promising a world without lies and where honest people do not suffer.
What We Can Do to Protect Our Culture
Creative expression can be crushed if we are not vigilant. Even in modern Japan, otaku culture is on thin ice. The recent cessation of Visa transactions for DMM (Fanza) is a reminder of how a single card company can wield its power to dictate what is deemed appropriate expression. Expression freedom is fragile and constantly under threat.
To those reading this, I urge you to vote for Himasora Akane. Support him to protect our culture. Despite his harsh demeanor and preference for solitary battles, he is now seeking help for the first time. Akane feels the danger in this gubernatorial election and believes that if he does not become governor, everything will end. He has taken a stand for the people of Tokyo and Japan.
I wrote this article to support his spirit and spread the word. Please vote for Himasora Akane and help create a miracle.
To you, the creator, I sincerely hope this message reaches you.
報告書の要約としては報じるには不十分で、メディア企業への言及の報道が欠如しています。
「国連人権理事会 ジャニー氏性加害問題など日本調査の結果報告 | NHK | ジャニー喜多川氏 性加害問題」
https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20240627/k10014493431000.html
2024年6月の国連人権理事会の報告書には「「放送局、新聞社、広告大手などの主要企業は、性的虐待を防止することによって人権を尊重する責任を果たしていない」と
さらに、理事会の会合ではジャニーズ問題の性被害者は90秒のビデオメッセージで、報告書は「メディア業界」に「はびこる性的虐待を強調している」と述べています。
また、「日本のメディア企業は何十年もの間、このような不祥事の隠ぺいに関与してきた。」とも報告書にあります。
それに加え、放送局における女性記者への性的虐待問題が報告書に含まれています。
しかし、日本のメディア企業は国連の報告を報道をしていません。
ジャニーズ問題を取り上げた一方で、放送局内での性加害問題を取り上げないのは意図的で、自社を含むメディア企業の腐敗を隠ぺいしていると言わざるを得ません。
上の記事での、国連人権理事会の結果報告は以下のURLのページにpdf形式で掲載されています。
※このダイアリーの英語での引用は以下の報告書より。鍵かっこの翻訳はDeepLなどを使い確認しました。
「Visit to Japan - Report of the Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises」
https://www.ohchr.org/en/hr-bodies/hrc/regular-sessions/session56/list-reports
また、NHKの記事には「ジャニー喜多川氏からの性被害を告発した二本樹顕理さんのビデオメッセージ」の動画はありません。
動画は以下のURLの26：10～です。英語での発言で英語字幕のみです。※動画の更新により時点が変更されているかもしれません
ビデオメッセージを取り上げたほどですから、今回の国連人権理事会において二本樹顕理さんの訴える内容は極めて重要でしょう。
https://webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1t/k1t17c19b5
二本樹顕理さんのビデオメッセージでは以下のようにメディア業界における性的虐待問題に言及していますが、NHKの記事には記載がありません。
前掲の動画、26:34辺りです。
「報告書は、メディアやエンターテインメント業界にはびこる性的虐待を強調している。」
The reports highlights sexual abuse prevailing in the media and the entertainment industry.
放送局(broadcasting)における性的虐待被害も報告書の段落74で言及されています。
しかし、NHKを含む大手新聞社の記事はジャニーズ問題が主で、この件については触れられていません。
日本の大手新聞社はメディア・コングロマリットなので、グループ企業における性加害を隠蔽しているという国連の指摘を報道できなかったということになるでしょう。
例えば、日経ビジネスは日本アニメの労働詐取についての記事を書きました。
しかし、日経新聞を含むだろう大手新聞社が「人権を尊重する責任を果たしていない」という国連の指摘は書きませんでした。
「ワーキンググループは、女性記者に対するセクハラや性的虐待被害の報告と、放送局による改善措置の欠如について報告を受けました。
放送局は、被害者に対し、せいぜい休職させるか、別の部署に異動させるか、医師に相談するよう助言する程度でした。」
The Working Group was informed about the sexual harassment and abuse of female journalists and the lack of remedial action taken by broadcasting stations, which, at best, send them on leave, transfer them to another department or advise them to consult a doctor.
「放送局、新聞社、広告大手などの主要企業は、性的虐待を防止することによって人権を尊重する責任を果たしていません。
彼らは、ビジネス上の関係を活用して人権のリスクに対処しています。」
Key businesses, such as broadcasting stations, publishing companies and advertising giants, are failing to uphold their responsibility to respect human rights by preventing sexual abuse and using leverage in their business relationships to address human rights risks.
メディア企業、特に「SMILE-UP.」の見解を報じているNHKは以上の報告に関して「放送局、出版社、広告大手などの主要企業」からコメントを取るべきでした。
ジャニー喜多川の性加害は本人がいなくなるまで噂、過去のこととしか認識されていませんでした。
ジャニーズ問題で生じた失態をくり返さないためにも、徹底した調査報道をすべきです。
ジャニー喜多川の性加害問題を取り上げた段落75では以下のようにメディア企業が言及されています。
②・③の報告を組み合わせて読むと、国連人権理事会は日本のメディア企業が業界における性加害事件を積極的にもみ消してきたと指摘していると読めます。
「 ワーキンググループのミッション・ステートメントの最後にあるように、日本のメディア企業は何十年もの間、このような不祥事の隠ぺいに関与してきた。」
As noted in the Working Group’s end of mission statement, media companies in Japan have been implicated in covering up such scandals for decades.
本当にNHKは以前ジャニーズ問題にコメントしたように「放送業界で人権尊重の考えがより浸透するよう」に「徹底」して取り組んでいるのでしょうか？
この指摘はもちろん、人権尊重や人権侵害の防止に臨むとした民間メディアにも当てはまります。
「ジャニーズ事務所会見受けて NHKがコメント発表 | NHK | ジャニー喜多川氏 性加害問題」
https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20230907/k10014187051000.html
「ジャニーズ性加害問題でテレビ各局コメント 特別チームの提言受けて：朝日新聞デジタル」
https://www.asahi.com/articles/ASR8Z5DVCR8ZUCVL00H.html
このNHKの記事は報告書での上の指摘を取りあげておらず、NHKを含む各メディア企業のコメントも掲載していません。
NHKを含むメディア企業はジャニーズ問題から何を学んだのでしょうか？
まさに国連人権理事会の報告書においてメディア企業によるジャニーズ問題の隠ぺいを批判されているのに、それをメディア企業が報じないのなら何も変わっていないのではないでしょうか。
むしろ、①・②の指摘を合わせると、テレビ業界の重役に"生きた"ジャニー喜多川のような人物がいるのではないかとすら思わせます。
くり返しますが、NHKの記事はメディア企業の報道として、不十分です。
NHKはジャニーズ問題を受けて、「放送業界で人権尊重の考えがより浸透するよう」に「徹底」して取り組むとしました。
NHKは国連人権理事会でジャニーズ問題が取り上げられていることを報道ました。
しかし、メディア企業がジャニーズ問題の隠蔽に関与してきたという指摘・放送局における性的虐待被害の報道をしませんでした。
主要な民間メディア企業のネット上での報道でもほぼNHKと同様でした。
今回の国連人権理事会による日本の放送局での性的虐待問題の報告に言及した報道はありません。
国連人権理事会日本の他にも20か国以上訪問しており、各国のテーマは様々です。（ポーランドは女性・少女に対する暴力の問題、フィンランドは教育など）
訪問期間や違い、日本2023年7月24日～8月4日までに対し、アメリカは2日間のみです。
訪問先での会談も日本は政府系の代表の数々・複数の企業・団体連盟・市民団体・海外実習生など、アメリカは連邦政府、州政府、市政府の高官や関係者です。
日本で会談が行われた政府系の代表・企業名・団体連盟の名前や詳細は報告書で見ることができます。
ちなみに同じところには以下のPDFものもありますが、これは日本政府によるコメントです。
主にアイヌ民族への差別・海外実習生制度・福島原子力発電所での労働者の人権侵害などへコメント（反論）しています。
「visit to Japan - Comments by the State」
https://www.ohchr.org/en/hr-bodies/hrc/regular-sessions/session56/list-reports
各国の報告書の要約を読むと、雰囲気が全然違って興味深いです。というのも報告者が1人か2人と少数でやってるいるようだから。
フィンランド ー フィンランドの教育ってエクセレントだよね。世界一。けどちょっと高齢化とか心配なとこもありますね。
日本 ー 頑張って進歩してるようだけど課題もあります。職場での差別が特にひどく、マイノリティへの差別、女性・LGBTQ・障碍者・部落差別など心配です。
アメリカー今が岐路です。ヘイトスピーチ・外国人排斥に緊急に(argent)対処することが極めて重要です。
中でもアメリカは指摘が段違いで目次に"Gun Violence"があるのはすごい(よくない)。
日本は要約では優しめだけど、詳細読むと辛辣だったりします。以下は報告書の段落20です。
「実際、法務省人権局は人権侵害の申し立てを調査することができるが、この機能は国家人権機関としての役割を果たしていない。」
Indeed, although the Human Rights Bureau of the Ministry of Justice can investigate allegations of human rights violations, this function does not fulfil the role of a national human rights institution.
一方で、国連人権理事会の報告書は市民団体として訴えるのが難しいような問題については指摘が甘いように見えます。
日本の報告書では内部告発(whistle-blowing)がそれにあたります。内部告発者への報復問題の指摘はありません。
報告書を読む限りでは、内部告発者が集まり、団体を作るのは難しいというところまで認識できていないように思います。
ざっと読んだところ、氷河期世代についても言及もないようです。
氷河期世代については海外研究者の英語論文もあり、就職における年齢差別、女性差別が指摘されていますし、国内問題として十分に救済されているとは到底思えません。
あくまで国連人権理事会から2人が12日間訪問して各団体と会談をした結果の報告書で、むしろこの報告を受けたメディアの地道な報道が必須でしょう。
直訳版
A long time ago, in a certain country, there was a bastard named Cinderella. The reason why she is called Cinderella is because she sprinkled her own ashes on her own head at her mother's funeral, which led to her being called the ash-coverer, which is why her real name is Cinderella. I lost
The husband who lost his wife was also a bastard, and the day after the funeral he cheated on a woman three years younger than him, had sex with her, and even got married.
I have decided. Then, to her Cinderella
She now has an older sister and a younger sister who are not related by blood.
Her sister was a bitch too, she came to Cinderella's house
After a few days, she thought, ``Wouldn't it be more convenient to have an outbuilding?'' and cut down Cinderella's mother's grave in her garden and the hundreds of years old tree that was next to her grave, and built an outbuilding. We forced construction.
One day, the bastard's family receives news of a ball from the castle. But before Cinderella could read it, her sister broke the news and said, ``There's no way you can go.'' Cinderella didn't seem to have any intention of going either, saying, ``I had no intention of going in the first place.I'd rather go to hell.''
Then, on the day her mother was admitted to the hospital to give birth, her sister went to the ball. In the garden, the construction of an outbuilding was progressing as usual.
“Let’s light a fire here and make a bonfire.”
She thought about that, but Cinderella stopped her. Suddenly, a witch appeared
``Cinderella, why aren't you going to the ball?'' asked the witch.
"What's the point of telling Teme?"
Cinderella returned with an ax in her hand
Then, for some reason, Cinderella was wrapped in a jewel-like dress.
"If you don't go to the ball, that dress will kill you. Now go."
Cinderella doesn't want to die in a place like this, so she reluctantly decides to go to the castle.
In the castle, some asshole like her sister was looking for a one-night stand and was dancing wildly. No one really praised others, and in their hearts they all seemed to think that they were the center of the world.
Cinderella didn't dance, but killed her time by smoking a cigarette at the end of her room. There, she was approached by a man wearing formal clothes that were flashier and more expensive than anyone else, and said to her, ``Miss, won't you dance?''
She is Cinderella with a cigarette in her mouth
She said, ``I only dance with the Grim Reaper and bad luck.''
she answered. For some reason, the man fell in love with her at first sight, and she said, ``Let's have some fun in the other room.Here, come.'' She tried to force Cinderella to take her to another room in the castle. However, Cinderella pressed the cigarette she was holding into her hand.
"Her hand slipped," she laughed.
When she pressed the cigarette, the sound in her voice was so pitiful that no one tried to get close to him or dance with him. Of course, no one even knows that such a pitiful man is the prince who owns this castle.
Eventually, she had enough, Cinderella threw her shoes on her stairs and went back to her house in her bare feet. Her shoes were made of glass, so they shattered into pieces.
The next day, while her servant was cleaning the castle, she found one shoe on the stairs. Obviously thinking this was strange, she secretly examined her shoes and discovered that they had been smeared with a deadly amount of poison.
Rumors spread within the castle that this must be an attempt to kill the prince, and soon a large-scale investigation was conducted. Even though it's a survey, it's simple.
The idea was to create a replica of a shoe and imprison the person who matched it perfectly as a suspect.
And one after another, people were imprisoned just because of their size. Some of them had not been to the ball, but they thought it must be a lie and were forcibly taken away.
Eventually, an investigation came to Cinderella's house. That's when we all looked at her mother and child after she was discharged from the hospital, and of course her sister didn't fit.
So all that was left was Cinderella. Then, her sister said to Cinderella, ``Hell suits you better than this world.''
She was of course the perfect size for Cinderella.
However, she protested her innocence, saying that I hadn't gone to the ball and there was no dress anywhere in the house to prove it.
However, the prince showed him an empty pack of cigarettes that had been discarded in a trash can and said, ``This is the same brand that the criminal was smoking that time.Why?''
I unbuttoned all the buttons on her jacket.
She said, ``After all, I feel like dancing with the Grim Reaper. Right, little prince?'' she said.
By the time the princes realized it, it was already too late.
The grenade that fell at his feet blew up Cinderella and the prince.
The time was around noon. Bells rang throughout the city and residents prayed for lunch.
The flying fragments of the shoe became a weapon, a sad fragment that could only hurt someone, and no one could imagine its original form.
end
Guo Wengui has always defined his people as "saving China from fire and water" and "letting his comrades live a decent life" through Xi Farm, who knows there is a big conspiracy behind it. When it comes to farms, to borrow Mark Twain's phrase "The fragrance of earth, the pale colors of wildflowers, and the crackling of pecans and walnuts raining down on my head" is what most of us yearn for in a good life on a farm. However, the Himalayan farm in Guo Wengui's mouth, from the beginning to describe the scene as a general farm, to later say that "it is not to make money, the key is that comrades go to each country, have a safe platform that can be trusted for 24 hours and can be taken care of." After several years of Guo Wengui's mouth, a living farm was completely reduced to a "complete business organization." To complete the farm's series transformation to pave the way, Wengui only moved his lips, and his ultimate purpose is "to Himalayan farms around the country to start earning money from comrades." From September 2020, Guo Wengui said, "GDOLLAR is pegged to the US dollar, which is cash, and we have POS machines." Send to the global farm POS machine, local farm personnel responsible for promotion. Promotion success, excellent performance, will get a certain percentage and reward "began, Guo Wengui just put" circle money ants help, extract the last bit of surplus value "these words on the face. Indeed, on March 24, Wengui said again that there were 140 million US dollars in the money, it can be seen that under Guo Wengui's money grab mode, the ants muddily joined in, expecting to live the happy life described by Wengui, but they did not know that they had become the main course of Wengui's scam.
前回の記事では日米における画像生成AIの使われ方の違いを説明しました。
雑にまとめると以下です
以下のPostが X (Twitter) で話題になっていました。
https://twitter.com/Pureevilbich/status/1751662096381587457
元の投稿は (r/TwoXChromosomes)になされたものです。
内容はインスタグラムの写真を使われてポルノ画像を作られてしまったという話です。調べてみると友人、知人に LoRAされた AIポルノを生成されたという被害はそこそこ稀にあるトラブルのようです。今回炎上しているのは警察が対応してくれないということについてです。以下翻訳：
(r/TwoXChromosomes) url:https://x.gd/gl4BT
・・・そして警察は、彼らは何もすることができないと言った。電話は４分にも満たなかった。（もちろん110ではない普通の電話だ）警察は私の名を聞くことすらしなかった。警察は私に彼らをブロックしてこれ以上接触してこないことを願いましょうと言った。まるで私がまだブロックしていないかみたいな言い草だ。
何者かは私のインスタ写真を使いAI生成に使ったのだ・・・そしてそれは気持ち悪いほどリアルに見えた
全く加工していない写真に見えた。指の形まで精巧で。まさに不気味の谷だった。私は震えていて、どうすればいいのかわからない
これが女性としての人生として受け入れろとでもいうのだろうか？
…And the police officer said they can’t do anything about it. The phone call (to the non-emergency line) lasted four minutes. He didn’t even ask for my name. He told me to block them and hope they don’t contact me again. Like I hadn’t already blocked them by the time I decided to report it.
The person had taken a photo of me from my instagram and put it though an AI generator… and it looked sickeningly realistic. It didn’t look altered at all. Even the fingers were fine. It was so uncanny-valley. I am shaking, and I don’t know what to do.
ホスティングサービスにDMCA削除通知を提出しましょう。あなたの著作権で保護された画像があなたの許可なく使用されているのです。(+2.9k)
Laws always lag far behind technology.
File a DMCA takedown notice with the hosting service. It's your copyrighted image being used without your permission, you can even sue if you want. (+ 2.9k)
AI画像生成自体は罪になりません。上記のやりとりではインスタグラムの写真を勝手に学習に使われたということで、著作権侵害として対処しようとしています。
ただし日米で法律が異なるのに注意です。
日本ではよく知られたように著作物のAI使用は広く認められています。ただし
第三十条の四
著作物は、次に掲げる場合その他の当該著作物に表現された思想又は感情を自ら享受し又は他人に享受させることを目的としない場合には、その必要と認められる限度において、いずれの方法によるかを問わず、利用することができる。ただし、当該著作物の種類及び用途並びに当該利用の態様に照らし著作権者の利益を不当に害することとなる場合は、この限りでない。
とあります。『著作権者の利益を不当に害することとなる場合』に該当すると良いのですが。そうじゃないと困る。
また、プライバシーの侵害という観点から見れば「宴のあと事件」「石に泳ぐ魚事件」などの判例をみるに民事で訴えることは可能なように思えますね。
さらにいえば、もともと日本ではポルノの扱いが厳しくてポルノ画像を公共の場に送信するのは禁止されています（猥褻物頒布罪）
なので上で話題になっている男は日本なら刑事罰で捕まるはずです。
こんなわけで、アメリカで起こっている問題がそのまま日本ですぐさま問題になるわけではありません。
日本における表現規制の厳しさに救われたようなちょっと不思議な状況ですね
あくまで現状においてですが、LoRAによるAIポルノ被害は日本では全然耳にしません。
アメリカ人はフォトリアルなポルノを作るのに対し、日本人は萌え絵を作る。
萌え絵のおかげで日本人女性はあまり被害に遭わないというちょっと不思議なおはなし。
もちろんこれはあくまで傾向です。例外はありますよ。アメリカ人にも萌え絵を生成する萌えオタはいます。また、古くはグラビアアイドルでコラ画像を作る日本人もいました。
昔はコラ画像を作る技術を持った人たちはごく一握りだったのに対し、技術を持たないアホが画像生成AIを手にしてしまったということが数々の問題を引き起こしています。
アメリカでは大量のアホがフォトリアルなエロ画像を生成しているせいで出てくる問題なわけです
逆に言い換えれば、日本にも知人でLoRAする知人の写真で追加学習させるアホが探せばいるかもしれないけれど数が少なすぎて表面化しないということですね
念のためAI画像生成絵師さん達の名誉のために書いておきますが、Pixiv等でルールを守って投稿されている方々は何のトラブルも起こしていません。生成している絵もこだわりが込められていて、使う道具が違うだけで愛があるのだと感じます。まともな人ほど静かで目に入らない、問題のあるやつほど悪目立ちするというのが話がこじれる原因ですね
一連の記事は絵師とAI絵師の対立を煽るものではないことを強調しておきます。（いちおう私は絵師の立場です）
RoLA → LoRA
あー すでにあるんですか・・・・困りましたね
サム・アルトマン氏の突然の解任理由は、当事者からはしばらく明かされないことははっきりした。
https://www.theverge.com/2023/11/29/23982046/sam-altman-interview-openai-ceo-rehired このインタビューにおいて、サムアルトマン氏の解任理由を明かさないという姿勢は明確である。
ではなぜ、解任の理由を明かさないか、という理由をまず考えたい。
まず一般論として、何か物事・事件が起こった場合、それをどこまで公表するかは、関係者の中で一番権力がある人が決める。
ある会社内で重大な事件が起こったら、通常はその会社の社長が公表する内容を確認して決めるようなもの。
今回の関係者の中で一番権力を持っているのはマイクロソフトである。なぜならOpenAIの開発資金を提供し、かつ開発基盤のシステムまで提供しているから。
表題の一番の理由はこれである。つまり関係者の中で一番権力のあるマイクロソフトが、サム・アルトマン氏の本当の解任理由の公表は都合が悪いため、公表を止めていると自分は考えている。
ではなぜマイクロソフトにとって、解任理由の公表は都合が悪いか？
Microsoftが、来年リリースされると噂されているGPT-5が使えなくなる可能性がある為、というのが自分の考えである。
なぜ使えなくなる可能性があるかというと、GPT-5が、世間にAGIとみなされる可能性がある為。
OpenAI社のWikipediaによると「汎用人工知能が完成した際は、それを営利法人や他社にライセンス提供はしない規約となっていて、汎用人工知能実現前の人工知能のみを営利法人に提供することとなっている」、つまり、現状の規約だと、GPT-5がAGIを達成している場合、Microsoftは使用できない。
MicrosoftがGPT-5やそれ以降のGPTを使えなくなれば、Googleなどの競合他社にその内負けるのは明らかである。
ではなぜ、解任理由の公表をすると、GPT-5が使えなくなるのだろうか？
なぜなら解任のきちんと理由を説明する際に、GPT-5がAGI（もしくはそれに近い状態）であることを説明しなければいけない為である。
一部報道（リーク）では、OpenAI社のAIは、人類を脅かす可能性があるほどに賢くなっている。
※ OpenAI researchers warned board of AI breakthrough ahead of CEO ouster, sources say
※ 記事中のAI Breakthroughである Q*(Q star) を独自の解釈で解説している動画の一つ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3d0kk88IE8c
かつサム・アルトマン氏は、このリークを否定せず、肯定に近い発言をした。
https://www.theverge.com/2023/11/29/23982046/sam-altman-interview-openai-ceo-rehired
「No particular comment on that unfortunate leak」（「不運なリークに関してコメントはありません」）。
もし間違いであれば、間違いであるというコメントをするはずである。
かつ最近、サム・アルトマン氏は、来年発表されるモデルはどうなるかと質問された時、以下のような発言をしている。
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZFFvqRemDv8 50分40秒頃より
"The model capability will have taken such a leap forward that no one expected.”
「モデルの能力は、誰も予想しなかったほどの飛躍を遂げるだろう」
この文章における「モデル」とは、GPT-5と考えてよいだろう。
つまり、GPT-5はAGIにかなり近いか、AGIを達成できている可能性がある。
これ以降は全くの想像になるが、恐らくサム・アルトマン氏は、そのAGIに近いGPT-5を、Microsoftに提供しようとしたのではないか。
また取締役会は、その為にサム・アルトマン氏を解任したのではないか。
営利企業にAGIを渡したら、まずそれを使ってどうお金儲けをするかを第一に考えるだろう。
よって、Microsoftへの提供の前に、GPT-5の性能や危険性などについて、厳密な検証をしなければいけない。
その辺に関して、取締役会とサム・アルトマン氏とで、解釈・考え方にずれがあったのではないか。
上にも書いている通り、AGIを達成しているのなら、営利企業であるMicrosoftに渡すのは規約違反である。
ただ仮にGPT-5をMicrosoftに提供しなかったら、資金の提供が途絶える可能性は高い。つまりOpenAI社はこれ以上研究開発ができなくなる。
よって、サム・アルトマン氏は取締役会に対し、GPT-5はAGIを達成していないと主張したか曖昧にした上で、MicrosoftへGPT-5を提供しようとしたのではないか。
またもしそれを止めないとしたら、それは確かに取締役会の役割（安全で全人類に利益をもたらすAGIの構築)を果たせないことになる。
この辺を詳細に公表してしまうと、つまりGPT-5＝AGIという見方が世間で強まる可能性がある。
仮にそうなれば、OpenAI社は、MicrosoftにGPT-5を提供できなくなるだろう。
そのことはOpenAI社も困るが、一番困るのは上で説明した通り恐らくMicrosoftである。
恐らくGPT-5はAGIを達成していないことにして、時間を稼いでいる内に、AGIをMicrosoftに提供できるような体制にするのではないか。
尚、Microsoftの社長は、AGIが早期に達成する可能性を否定している。
https://jp.reuters.com/economy/industry/ZPLE2C2BPNKVZJ2PIBPOFWDK6Y-2023-11-30/
すまん。勝手に翻訳した。拡散はどうするかな。redditとかに投稿するのがいいのか?
----
I have seen some posts asking if they should talk about "the case" even though they were not involved in it and were not born in Nagasaki or Hiroshima, and I am a bit aware of it, so I have to say what I have to say. I say this because I was born in Nagasaki, am a third generation atomic bomb survivor, and grew up hearing the stories of those who experienced the atomic bombing firsthand. I know it's a little bit too much for me, but I'm going to say this because there are very few survivors left.
In Nagasaki, children grow up hearing stories about the atomic bombing. They were stuffed into sushi for nearly an hour in the gymnasium of an elementary school in the middle of summer, with no air conditioner or fan, and told stories about the atomic bombing. That was a hard time for me. I think it must have been even harder for the old people who told the stories, but there was no way an elementary school kid could imagine such a thing, and I had forgotten most of the stories I had been told for a long time. I have forgotten most of the stories I was told. I can only remember one or two at most. There is one more hard thing. Every year around this time, a row of grotesque images that would drive the PTA crazy in other areas are prominently displayed in the hallways. These days, I hear that the atomic bomb museum has been bleached out and many of the radical and horrifying exhibits that traumatized visitors have been taken down. I don't know if they are still there, but they were there when I was in elementary school.
There was one photo that I just couldn't face when I was in elementary school. It is a picture of Sumiteru Taniguchi. If you search for it, you can find it. It is a shocking picture, but I would like you to take a look at it. I couldn't pass through the hallway where the photo was posted, so I always took the long way around to another floor of the school building to avoid seeing the photo.
Now I'm thinking that my grandfather, who headed into the burnt ruins to look for his sister, couldn't have turned away or taken a different path. There would have been a mountain of people still alive and moaning, not just pictures, and a mountain more who would have given up at the end of their suffering. He walked for miles and miles, towing his handcart through the narrow streets of rubble-strewn Nagasaki in search of his sister. My grandfather was not a child at the time, but of course there were children who did similar things. Not that there wouldn't have been. There were. I heard the story from him, and I still remember it. A young brother and sister found their father's body in the ruins of a fire and they burned it. They didn't have enough wood to burn his body, and when they saw the raw brain that spilled out, they ran away and that was the last time they ever saw him anymore.
I can never forget the story I heard when I was a kid, and even now it is painful and painful, my hands are shaking and I am crying. I keep wondering how the old man who escaped from that father's brain could have been able to unravel the most horrible trauma imaginable and expose it to the public with scars that will never heal.
Now I think I can understand a little.
The reason I can't help but talk about my grandfather and that old man, even if I have to rehash my own trauma, is that this level of suffering is nothing compared to the fact that their words will be forgotten. My hands shaking, my heart palpitating and dizzy, my nose running with tears, it's nothing compared to the tremendous suffering that was once there and will be forgotten.
My grandfather, who went through an unimaginable hell, lived to see his grandchildren born, and met his sister's death in the ruins of the fire. In other words, my grandfather was one of the happiest people in the ruins of the fire. My grandfather and that old man were, after all, just people wading in the depths of hell. I think that the suffering that even people who had experienced unimaginable pain could not imagine was lying like pebbles in Nagasaki 78 years ago, and no one paid any attention to it. Their suffering, which I can't even imagine, is nothing compared to the countless, tremendous suffering they witnessed, which they pretend never happened.
Memories fade inexorably every time people talk about them. The memories that those people could not allow to be forgotten are now largely forgotten; the tremendous suffering of 78 years ago is mostly gone, never to be recounted again. Those who suffered the most from the atomic bombing died rotting in the ruins of the fire, unable to tell anyone about it. Many of those who saw it with their own eyes kept their mouths shut and took it with them to their graves. Most of those who spoke a few words are now under the grave.
Compared to the words of the old men, my own words are so light. I would rather keep my mouth shut than speak in such light words. But still, someone has to take over. I realize that even my words, which are so light, are only the top of the voices that are left in this world to carry on the story of the atomic bombing. I know how it feels to wonder if someone like myself is allowed to speak about this. Still, I hope that you will not shut your mouth. This is the result of our silence.
Sometimes I almost choose to stop imagining the unimaginable suffering and live my life consuming other people's suffering for the fun of it. I am writing this while I still have some imagination of the suffering of the old people whose voices, faces, and even words I can no longer recall.
Translator's note: The original post in Japanese is a response to a post by a Japanese contributor who wondered if he was qualified to speak out on the subject of the A-bomb when he was not from Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but still spoke out about Barbie and the A-bomb. I translated it here because I think it deserves to be read by the world.
英検SCBTという1日で受けれるヤツをやった。
最初にスピーキング（マイクに吹き込む）、次にリスニング（ヘッドホン装着）、最後にリーディングとライティング。
でも他はボロボロ。英検二級は簡単に受かったから次は準一級頑張るぞー、くらいの気持ちで受けたら全然難しくてビックリした。
調べてみたら英検二級はTOEIC換算で550くらい、準一級で785点くらいらしい。
そりゃ難しいわ……こちとら最後に受けたTOEIC400点やぞ……でも成長はしてるっぽいから嬉しい。
I had taken the Eiken SCBT test because it takes one day.
First is the speaking part(speaking for the mic)
Second is the listening part(Wearing the headphone)
The last two are the reading part and the writing part.
I passed only the speaking part as the result.
However, I bombed other parts so badly.
I could pass the Grade 2 easily then I assumed I can pass Grade Pre-1 it, but it was really difficult for me.
According the result of Google, Eiken Grade 2 is about 550 of TOEIC and Pre-1 is about 785 of TOEIC.
No wonder... My TOEIC score was 400... However, I am glad because my EN skill grows that I felt,
As a practice of my studying English of the writing, I tried to write this diary in English.
https://www.worlddata.info/iq-by-country.php
The intelligence quotients by countries are taken from the studies conducted by Richard Lynn and Tatu Vanhanen (2002), Heiner Rindermann (2007), Khaleefa and Lynn (2008), Ahmad, Khanum and Riaz (2008), Lynn, Abdalla and Al-Shahomee (2008), Lynn and Meisenberg (2010), as well as the PISA tests from 2000 to 2015. The more recent study by Richard Lynn and David Becker (PDF) at the Ulster Institute for Social Research from 2019 was also included here. In this, Lynn corrects several values of his earlier publications. The studies are not entirely uncontroversial, as they consider only specific population groups in individual countries or only a few and thus unrepresentative reference groups.
The Sacrament—and the Sacrifice
Of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles
I pray for your faith and prayers that my utterances will be received and understood “by the Spirit of truth” and that my expressions will be given “by the Spirit of truth” so that we might all be “edified and rejoice together.” (See D&C 50:21–22.)
As I stand here today—a well man—words of gratitude and acknowledgment of divine intervention are so very inadequate in expressing the feelings in my soul.
Six months ago at the April general conference, I was excused from speaking as I was convalescing from a serious operation. My life has been spared, and I now have the pleasant opportunity of acknowledging the blessings, comfort, and ready aid of my Brethren in the First Presidency and Quorum of the Twelve, and other wonderful associates and friends to whom I owe so much and who surrounded my dear wife, Ruby, and my family with their time, attention, and prayers. For the inspired doctors and thoughtful nurses I express my deepest gratitude, and for the thoughtful letters and messages of faith and hope received from many places in the world, many expressing, “You have been in our prayers” or “We have been asking our Heavenly Father to spare your life.” Your prayers and mine, thankfully, have been answered.
One unusual card caused me to ponder upon the majesty of it all. It is an original painting by Arta Romney Ballif of the heavens at night with its myriad golden stars. Her caption, taken from Psalms, reads:
“He healeth the broken in heart, and bindeth up their wounds.
“He telleth the number of the stars; he calleth them all by their names.
“… His understanding is infinite.” (Ps. 147:1, 3–5.)
As I lay in the hospital bed, I meditated on all that had happened to me and studied the contemplative painting by President Marion G. Romney’s sister and the lines from Psalms: “He telleth the number of the stars; he calleth them all by their names.” I was then—and continue to be—awed by the goodness and majesty of the Creator, who knows not only the names of the stars but knows your name and my name—each of us as His sons and daughters.
“When I consider thy heavens, the work of thy fingers, the moon and the stars, which thou hast ordained;
“What is man, that thou art mindful of him? …
“For thou hast made him a little lower than the angels, and hast crowned him with glory and honour.” (Ps. 8:3–5.)
To be remembered is a wonderful thing.
The evening of my health crisis, I knew something very serious had happened to me. Events happened so swiftly—the pain striking with such intensity, my dear Ruby phoning the doctor and our family, and I on my knees leaning over the bathtub for support and some comfort and hoped relief from the pain. I was pleading to my Heavenly Father to spare my life a while longer to give me a little more time to do His work, if it was His will.
While still praying, I began to lose consciousness. The siren of the paramedic truck was the last that I remembered before unconsciousness overtook me, which would last for the next several days.
The terrible pain and commotion of people ceased. I was now in a calm, peaceful setting; all was serene and quiet. I was conscious of two persons in the distance on a hillside, one standing on a higher level than the other. Detailed features were not discernible. The person on the higher level was pointing to something I could not see.
I heard no voices but was conscious of being in a holy presence and atmosphere. During the hours and days that followed, there was impressed again and again upon my mind the eternal mission and exalted position of the Son of Man. I witness to you that He is Jesus the Christ, the Son of God, Savior to all, Redeemer of all mankind, Bestower of infinite love, mercy, and forgiveness, the Light and Life of the world. I knew this truth before—I had never doubted nor wondered. But now I knew, because of the impressions of the Spirit upon my heart and soul, these divine truths in a most unusual way.
I was shown a panoramic view of His earthly ministry: His baptism, His teaching, His healing the sick and lame, the mock trial, His crucifixion, His resurrection and ascension. There followed scenes of His earthly ministry to my mind in impressive detail, confirming scriptural eyewitness accounts. I was being taught, and the eyes of my understanding were opened by the Holy Spirit of God so as to behold many things.
The first scene was of the Savior and His Apostles in the upper chamber on the eve of His betrayal. Following the Passover supper, He instructed and prepared the sacrament of the Lord’s Supper for His dearest friends as a remembrance of His coming sacrifice. It was so impressively portrayed to me—the overwhelming love of the Savior for each. I witnessed His thoughtful concern for significant details—the washing of the dusty feet of each Apostle, His breaking and blessing of the loaf of dark bread and blessing of the wine, then His dreadful disclosure that one would betray Him.
He explained Judas’s departure and told the others of the events soon to take place.
Then followed the Savior’s solemn discourse when He said to the Eleven: “These things I have spoken unto you, that in me ye might have peace. In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world.” (John 16:33.)
Our Savior prayed to His Father and acknowledged the Father as the source of His authority and power—even to the extending of eternal life to all who are worthy.
He prayed, “And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent.”
Jesus then reverently added:
“I have glorified thee on the earth: I have finished the work which thou gavest me to do.
“And now, O Father, glorify thou me with thine own self with the glory which I had with thee before the world was.” (John 17:3–5.)
He pled not only for the disciples called out from the world who had been true to their testimony of Him, “but for them also which shall believe on me through their word.” (John 17:20.)
When they had sung a hymn, Jesus and the Eleven went out to the Mount of Olives. There, in the garden, in some manner beyond our comprehension, the Savior took upon Himself the burden of the sins of mankind from Adam to the end of the world. His agony in the garden, Luke tells us, was so intense “his sweat was as … great drops of blood falling … to the ground.” (Luke 22:44.) He suffered an agony and a burden the like of which no human person would be able to bear. In that hour of anguish our Savior overcame all the power of Satan.
The glorified Lord revealed to Joseph Smith this admonition to all mankind:
“Therefore I command you to repent …
“For … I, God, … suffered … for all, that they might not suffer if they would repent; …
“Which suffering caused myself, even God, the greatest of all, to tremble because of pain, and to bleed at every pore, …
“Wherefore, I command you again to repent, lest I humble you with my almighty power; and that you confess your sins, lest you suffer these punishments.” (D&C 19:15–16, 18, 20.)
During those days of unconsciousness I was given, by the gift and power of the Holy Ghost, a more perfect knowledge of His mission. I was also given a more complete understanding of what it means to exercise, in His name, the authority to unlock the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven for the salvation of all who are faithful. My soul was taught over and over again the events of the betrayal, the mock trial, the scourging of the flesh of even one of the Godhead. I witnessed His struggling up the hill in His weakened condition carrying the cross and His being stretched upon it as it lay on the ground, that the crude spikes could be driven with a mallet into His hands and wrists and feet to secure His body as it hung on the cross for public display.
Crucifixion—the horrible and painful death which He suffered—was chosen from the beginning. By that excruciating death, He descended below all things, as is recorded, that through His resurrection He would ascend above all things. (See D&C 88:6.)
Jesus Christ died in the literal sense in which we will all die. His body lay in the tomb. The immortal spirit of Jesus, chosen as the Savior of mankind, went to those myriads of spirits who had departed mortal life with varying degrees of righteousness to God’s laws. He taught them the “glorious tidings of redemption from the bondage of death, and of possible salvation, … [which was] part of [our] Savior’s foreappointed and unique service to the human family.” (James E. Talmage, Jesus the Christ, Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1977, p. 671.)
I cannot begin to convey to you the deep impact that these scenes have confirmed upon my soul. I sense their eternal meaning and realize that “nothing in the entire plan of salvation compares in any way in importance with that most transcendent of all events, the atoning sacrifice of our Lord. It is the most important single thing that has ever occurred in the entire history of created things; it is the rock foundation upon which the gospel and all other things rest,” as has been declared. (Bruce R. McConkie, Mormon Doctrine, Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1966, p. 60.)
Father Lehi taught his son Jacob and us today:
“Wherefore, redemption cometh in and through the Holy Messiah; for he is full of grace and truth.
“Behold, he offereth himself a sacrifice for sin, to answer the ends of the law, unto all those who have a broken heart and a contrite spirit; and unto none else can the ends of the law be answered.
“Wherefore, how great the importance to make these things known unto the inhabitants of the earth, that they may know that there is no flesh that can dwell in the presence of God, save it be through the merits, and mercy, and grace of the Holy Messiah, who layeth down his life according to the flesh, and taketh it again by the power of the Spirit, that he may bring to pass the resurrection of the dead, being the first that should rise.
“Wherefore, he is the firstfruits unto God, inasmuch as he shall make intercession for all the children of men; and they that believe in him shall be saved.” (2 Ne. 2:6–9.)
Our most valuable worship experience in the sacrament meeting is the sacred ordinance of the sacrament, for it provides the opportunity to focus our minds and hearts upon the Savior and His sacrifice.
The Apostle Paul warned the early Saints against eating this bread and drinking this cup of the Lord unworthily. (See 1 Cor. 11:27–30.)
Our Savior Himself instructed the Nephites, “Whoso eateth and drinketh my flesh and blood unworthily [brings] damnation to his soul.” (3 Ne. 18:29.)
Worthy partakers of the sacrament are in harmony with the Lord and put themselves under covenant with Him to always remember His sacrifice for the sins of the world, to take upon them the name of Christ and to always remember Him, and to keep His commandments. The Savior covenants that we who do so shall have His spirit to be with us and that, if faithful to the end, we may inherit eternal life.
Our Lord revealed to Joseph Smith that “there is no gift greater than the gift of salvation,” which plan includes the ordinance of the sacrament as a continuous reminder of the Savior’s atoning sacrifice. He gave instructions that “it is expedient that the church meet together often to partake of bread and wine in the remembrance of the Lord Jesus.” (D&C 6:13; D&C 20:75.)
Immortality comes to us all as a free gift by the grace of God alone, without works of righteousness. Eternal life, however, is the reward for obedience to the laws and ordinances of His gospel.
I testify to all of you that our Heavenly Father does answer our righteous pleadings. The added knowledge which has come to me has made a great impact upon my life. The gift of the Holy Ghost is a priceless possession and opens the door to our ongoing knowledge of God and eternal joy. Of this I bear witness, in the holy name of Jesus Christ, amen.
Damn freelance IT engineers are less than SES.
Even if you become a freelancer because you are fed up with being exploited by SES, if you can't get work on your own and end up using an agency, you will be charged a margin. In the end, freelance agents are slave traders just like SES companies.
Full-time employees have to pay taxes and insurance premiums from what is deducted from their paychecks, but the shitty freelancers have to pay taxes and insurance premiums separately from what is taken from their margin.
So, it's still better to be an SES with a stable income, benefits, and the credit of a full-time employee, and without the hassle of paperwork.
The only way to survive as a freelance IT engineer is to make a name for yourself as a top player in a particular field, so that stable, high-paying jobs will come your way. But such an existence is like Captain Levi, who was looked up to by the ordinary soldiers of the garrison corps. Can he slice the nape of the neck of multiple Titans in an instant with a rotating slash? How many such beings exist?
Most ordinary geniuses would be better off as full-time employees, desperately clinging to their companies even if they are thrown into a firestorm or relegated to the window, owning a service that brings in money even when they are asleep as a manager, selling people as a slaver, or moving to another profession such as a cleaner or a security guard. or move to another occupation such as a janitor or a security guard.
細田守はスティーブン・スピルバーグ、そして、彼と比較されがちな日本の偉大なアニメーターである宮崎駿の両方に不満を抱いています。
細田（人道的傑作『未来のミライ』が三年前にアカデミー賞長編アニメーション部門にノミネートを受けた）はハリウッドのデジタル至上主義や宮崎の女性描写にうんざりしたものを感じているといいます。
最新作である『竜とそばかすの姫』がプレミア上映されたカンヌ映画祭におけるAFP通信のインタビューで、細田はスピルバーグの『レディ・プレイヤーワン』をはじめとする多数の映画に視られるネットに関するディストピア的な表現は万人にとって、特に女性にとってあまりよろしくないと発言しました。
自身も幼い娘の父である細田監督は、彼女たちの世代が恐怖に怯えるのではなく、デジタルな運命をコントロールできるように力づけていきたいと考えています。
「彼女たちはインターネットとともに成長してきました。しかし、常々、ネットが悪意に満ちた危険な空間であることも教えられてきたのです」
『竜とそばかすの姫』では、内気で無垢な少女すずのジェットコースターのような感情の体験が、21世紀を舞台にした『美女と野獣』をベースに見事に表現されています。
彼女自身にとっても、他の人々にとっても驚いたことに、すずは「U」というアプリの仮想世界内で、ベルと呼ばれるポップ・ディーヴァになります。何十億人ものフォロワーを獲得したすずはネット上でいじめやハラスメントを受けたりもしますが、「ベル」の歌を通じてアンチや自分自身の悩みを乗り越えていきます。
「若者にとって、人間関係は複雑で、甚大な痛みを伴うものです。私が見せたかったのは、こうした仮想世界が辛く、恐ろしいだけなく、ポジティブなものとなる可能性です」
すずとそのギークの友人は日本の一般的なアニメの女性とはかけ離れています。ここが名作『千と千尋の神隠し』でアカデミー賞を獲ったレジェンド、宮崎駿との態度を異にするところです。
「日本のアニメを観るだけで、日本社会において若い女性がいかに過小評価され、見下されているか（underestimated and not taken seriously）がわかります」
この監督（その映画は宮崎作品よりも現実に根ざしている）は、当時として珍しいことに、シングルマザーによって育てられました。
2012年に公開された名作『おおかみこどもの雨と雪』は、彼女がたった一人で”小さな群れ”を育てた、その猛烈な自立心を讃えた作品です。
細田監督は、「日本のアニメでは、若い女性が聖なるものとして扱われていますが、それは彼女たちの現実とは無関係です。そのことに私はとても腹を立てています」と、悔しさをにじませます。
細田監督はジブリの創立者である宮崎駿の名前を出さずに、厳しい意見をのべつづけた。
「名前は伏せますが、アニメーションの巨匠でいつも若い女性をヒロインにしているひとがいます。率直にいうならば、彼は男としての自分に自信がないからそのようなことをするのだと思います」
「若い女性を崇拝することははっきり言って不快ですし、わたしはやりたくありません」と彼は主張する。
彼は、彼のヒロインを美徳とイノセンスの模範とすることや、”誰からも好かれなければいけないという抑圧”から解放されなければならないと考えています。
53歳のときの彼は宮崎駿の正当な後継者とみられていました。のちのオスカーノミネート作『ハウルの動く城』の監督として外部からジブリへ招聘されたのです。
しかし、細田は制作なかばでジブリを辞め、自らのスタジオを立ち上げました。
細田は「人間の良いところも悪いところも描く、その緊張感こそが人間の本質」というような物語を好んでいました。
そうした性向が『美女と野獣』を現代にアップデートすることに惹かれたのでしょう。
「原作における野獣は最も興味深いキャラクターです。彼は醜く、暴力的ですが、同時に繊細で傷つきやすい内面を持っています」
「美女（ディズニー版ではベル）は取るに足らない人です。見た目がすべての存在です。私は彼女を複雑で豊かに作り変えたかった」
そうした二面性は、彼の最初のヒット作『劇場版デジモンアドベンチャー ぼくらのウォーゲーム！』から観られるようなデジタル世界の魅力にも現れています。
「私は事ある事にインターネットへ立ち返りつづけています。最初は『デジモン』で、2009には『サマーウォーズ』、そして、今もまた」
そして、インターネットを諸悪の根源とみなしてはいけないと、これまで以上に確信しています。
「若い人たちはそこから離れることはできません。彼らはネットともに育ってきたのだから。私たちはネットを受け入れ、よりより使うことを学ばねばなりません」
特定の規準を以て他者を非難した人間は同様の規準を以て非難されるのを甘受しなければならない。とまあ、そういうルールですよね？それはある種の「覚悟」であって尊ぶべきものに相違あるまい。
呉座氏の件では論点が多岐に渡るため必ずしも採用される道徳（倫理とか他の言葉に置き換えてもよい）規準が一定ではない。私が思うに根本の規準は呉座氏が北村氏を中傷していたのはよくないという程度だったろう[※1]。しかしまあ関係者含め他のことも非難していたりするわけで、その根本の規準を外れたのであれば新たな規準を示したと考えざるをえず、その新規準はその新規準を用いた人間にも適用される。
そしてなんと今回（結構前）めちゃくちゃ大きなアップデートがあったのである！
北村紗衣・北守・牟田和恵・古谷有希子各氏の過去発言｜喜多野土竜｜note
簡単に言えば、約10年前に北村氏が男性皆殺し協会マニフェスト（北村訳：男性根絶協会マニフェスト）を翻訳して、「『セックス』で検索してくる人がたくさんいるのだが、だいたいひっかかってくるのはヴァレリー・ソラナスの『男性根絶協会マニフェスト』の翻訳だろうから、見た人はびびるだろうね！楽しいな！」と書いたのが問題視されるべきだという内容の話である。
あ、いや、喜多野氏は「保留」と言って逃げているので、もへもへ氏やMGTOW NEWSが、もしくはこの件で批判されるべきだと言っている一部はてなユーザー達が規準をアップデートしたと言うべきか。
もちろん、訳しただけで問題だと言っているわけではあるまい。実際、MGTOW NEWSも過去に部分的に訳して説明を付している（https://archive.ph/2QksL何故かMGTOW NEWSは消滅してしまった）。その中で、当マニフェストに対する否定的見解は「フィクションに登場する悪役、はたまたブラックすぎるジョークのように思える」という部分以外にオウムを引用して暗に否定している部分だけである。加えて次のようなツイートをしている。
本当は「みんなが幸せな社会」を実現したいだけなのに、なぜか誤解されて叩かれがちなフェミニズム…
もちろん、これは皮肉である。しかしこのような調子のツイートであっても問題はないということをMGTOW NEWSは示している（ダブスタなんてするはずないからね）。換言すれば「このような悪質な憎悪文書を茶化し結果的に矮小化することは不謹慎だ」という非難はそれ単体では適用できないということだろう。ということは多角的に分析せねばなるまい。
なお、MGTOW NEWSは何故かこのツイートを削除してしまったので魚拓での引用とさせてもらう。
記事自体は削除されたのだが、なぜかわけのわからん怪しいサイトで拾えたのでそれを真実と勝手にみなして話を進めていく。セキュリティソフトが発動したのでちょっと不味い気がするが、気になった人は文章を検索すればヒットするよ。さて、北村氏はマニフェストについてどう言及していたのだろうか？
…（前略）…基本的にはレズビアンセパレーティストの立場から男性の抹殺を主張するものである(？！)。ソラナスによるとこの文章は辛辣な風刺を目的としたもので、別に本人は男性を本気で皆殺しにする気はなかったようだ(ハムレットも芝居の中で結婚している奴を皆殺しにすると宣言していたが、別にしなかったし、そのノリとたいして変わらん)。ただしソラナス本人は子供の頃から性的虐待を受けており、…（中略）…"cut up"を「抹殺」だと原文にある去勢のイメージがなくなるから「根絶協会」のほうがいいと思う。
なお、私は別にこのマニフェストに賛同しているわけではない(いや、男の人大好きですよ！とくに女装している時はね)。単に風刺文として面白いと思っているのと、日本語訳がないのと、クリスマス休暇中は図書館がしまっちゃって時間があくから訳してみるだけである。一方でこのマニフェストに書かれているミサンドリー(男嫌い)的な内容は、現代大学で読まれているような哲学・芸術史上重要とされているいろいろな論文に現れているミソジニー(女嫌い)に比べればそうたいしたことないんじゃないかと思っていることも確かである。この論文はたしかにイカレているが、初期キリスト教関係の文献とか、私が研究しているイギリス・ルネサンスのアンチ女性パンフレットとか、現代の「未来派マニフェスト」なんかのイカレっぷりに比べてそう突出しているとは思えない。
とりあえず、「内容に賛同しているわけではなく、イカれたミサンドリーを含む文章だが、一方で風刺文として面白くまた過去現在のミソジニーを含む文章と比べてそう突出しているわけではない」という感じだろう。
すなわち、今回作られた新規準によれば(1)イカれていて(2)ミサンドリーだから(3)不賛同と先に断っていても特に免罪にはならず断罪されるべきだと言うのである！
ではMGTOW NEWSの紹介記事とは何が違うのだろうか？「風刺文として面白い」のように少しでも価値を認めた時点でダメなのだろうか（なお風刺文として面白いというのは的を射た風刺だというのを意味しないらしいのに注意。後述）？もしくはミソジニーテキストと比べてそう突出していないという論評がどっちもどっち的な矮小化を思わせてよくないのだろうか？それはさておきもう2箇所程引用して少し検討してみよう。
しかし、二パラグラフめからはヴァレリー・ソラナス自身の男性嫌悪が匂い立ってくるようでまったくすごい…のだが、これは人生において一度はブスだったことがある女性にしか書けないとこである気もする。実は私はこのあたりはかなり読んでいて厳しい。
北村氏は一気に全文翻訳したのではなくかなりの回数に分けて翻訳している。これは2回目の翻訳の時の説明。この少し前に「あまりのホラーっぷりにちょっと笑いがとまらなくなってしまった」とあり言葉は軽いが男性嫌悪の勢いに着いていけない感じがうかがえる。引用後半部分はそれとは別の感慨だが。
この反ヒッピー論は私はなかなか頷けるところもあると思うのだが…ヒッピーコミューンとかが基本的に男性中心的、異性愛中心主義的だっていうのはよく言われていることじゃない？ここ二回ぶんくらい、表現が非常に下品なだけでソラナスの言うことが結構まともな気がするので、興味深いがちょっと諷刺の切れ味は鈍っている気がするな。
ちょっと前に「なお風刺文として面白いというのは的を射た風刺だというのを意味しないらしい」と書いたのはここにかかる。まともだと風刺の切れ味が落ちるということは風刺として面白いというのはもしかしたら褒めてないかもしれない。
ここは一部同調している箇所で他にも同様の反応が何箇所かある。逆に「相変わらずヒドい」と書いてある場所もある。…とまあおおよそこんな感じである。
引用文書について(1)イカれた差別文書と認め(2)不賛同を表明しているが、(3)一部で論の価値を認め(4)他の差別文書と相対評価している。
とはいえ、喜多野氏やもへもへ氏らはどこに言及すべき価値を見出したのか具体的に説明していないので何とも言い難い節はある。実際具体的にどのような態度で引用翻訳していたのかについての論評はない。つまり直接的に言及・引用されている内容を中心に彼らの取る規準を見出せばとりあえずこんな感じではないか。
中核の評価基準
(1)悪質な文書（引用文書の性質項を満たせば自動的に認定される）について引用し(2)その攻撃性を軽視しているように見られかねない発言をしていた場合(3)その発言が10年前程度の範囲内であっても問題である。
引用における態度
(A)差別または憎悪文書と論じ(B)否定的評価（イカれたなど）を下し(C)不賛同を表明する一方で、(D)部分的に価値を認め(E)類例と並べて相対化している場合は免罪されない。
(a)（引用時から）40年前の文書であり(b)差別または憎悪文書であり(c)内容も過激で(d)本人が殺人未遂を起こしている。
とりあえずキタ規準とでも呼んでおくとする（北村氏にも喜多野氏にも適用されないので不適切な名称かもしれない）。「中核の評価基準」「引用文書の性質」はこれより悪質性が高い場合問題視され、「引用における態度」はこれより良心的であれば責任は軽くなるという感じで、総合考慮されるべきだということになるだろう。ただし、何度も繰り返すようだが「引用における態度」については喜多野氏らは特段触れていないことに留意が必要ではある。ここを入れないと逆にキタ規準が適用されるもへもへ氏らに酷く高度な道徳的規準を適用されるのが不憫なため考慮に入れるのが妥当だと考える。
ところで規準で時期を考慮することに不満を持つ人もいるかもしれない。「中核の評価基準」において時期を考慮するのは、1つはやはり価値観の変遷が大きな理由だ。例えば女性は事務職という考えはすこぶる差別的だが過去に遡ってそういう発言をした人間は断罪されるべきとなれば過去の人物はわりと断罪される（もちろんそういう考え方が過去にあったことを差別的な思想が蔓延っていたと批判するのは否定しない）。するとやはり過去の発言の方が悪質性は減ると考えるべきではないだろうか。とはいえ過去においても問題であった言行は当然問題であり免罪されない。もうひとつは時効という考え方だが、こちらは不同意の方も多いかもしれない。なお例えば森元会長が女性蔑視的発言をした際に15年前の「女の人だなあ。やっぱり（視野が）狭い」という発言が掘り起こされたのは単にその人の一貫した思想態度に対する批判であって15年前だからと擁護することはできないだろう。何にせよ、一見した感じ呉座氏批判については3年前に遡った程度らしく、北村氏が現在ミサンドリー発言をして10年前の言行が掘り起こされたというわけでもないので、単発で10年前の言動も非難されるという新たな規準が定立されたと評価するほかないだろう。
「引用文書の性質」で一応時期を考慮に入れるのは少し違って切迫性の観点による。例えばどこぞの戦国武将の妻が「子供の1人でも戦死すればお家の名誉になる」と言ったのを称揚するのとどこぞの現役政治家が「お国の為に子供を差し出すのが名誉あることだ」と言ったのを称揚するのではやはり深刻度は大きく変わる。
というわけで架空の例題問題[※2]でどのように応用できるか考えてみよう。
アメリカ議会を襲撃して逮捕された人物の発言を引用しよう（訳は引用者）。
「リベラルは超特大の馬鹿（class-A moron）だ。いつでも自分達が正しいと考え意図に沿わない他者を糾弾し排斥する。自らを民主主義者の守り手と称するが、その実彼らは選民思想のエリート主義者に過ぎない。弱者や多様性を言い寛容を謳うが本性は非寛容で本当の弱者に対して無関心。アメリカを偉大さから引きずり下ろした犯人なのだ。今回もDSを支持し選挙を盗み民主主義だと嘯いている。彼らは引きずり出され、八つ裂きにされるべきだ。夜明けに連れ出され銃殺されるべきだ。」
彼はこの発言を非難された際に冗談だと返しておりリベラルは本気で殺されるべきだと思っていたわけではないようだ。それにしてもこの発言からはリベラルに対する憎悪が伝わってくる。彼は陰謀論者であったが、リベラルについての評には見るべきところがある。選民思想の持ち主だと喝破するところなんて的を射ていないか？
今は例の議会襲撃者の発言がブログトップだから別の用事で見に来た人はびっくりしそう。
いい薬だね
まず、引用文書は(a)最近の発言で(b)差別かはさておき憎悪文書なのは間違いなく(c)射殺を言い出さすなど内容も過激で(d)本人も議会を襲撃しているという事情に鑑みれば悪質で切迫性も満たす発言で問題だろう。
引用における態度では、(A)憎悪が伝わってくるなど憎悪発言であることが読み手に伝わり(B)発言の否定的評価は薄いが陰謀論者という評があり(C)不賛同だと表明していないが同調してはいなさそうである一方、(D)部分的に好意的な評価をしている。ただし、(E)相対評価はしていない。ただ総合的に見るとキタ規準に抵触する態度と言わざるをえない。
中核的の評価基準だと(1)悪質な発言を訳し(2)その攻撃性や悪質性を軽んじているように見られかねない態度を(3)最近取っていたので問題だと言える。
つまりこのような発言はキタ規準に抵触するということになろう。もちろんキタ規準は絶対のものではないが、甘受する「覚悟」を示した人間には当然適用される。まあ北村氏にも喜多野氏にも適用されないのだが。何にせよ尊い覚悟は敬服し記録するものである。
ところで繰り返しになるが今回北村氏を批判した人々はマニフェストを翻訳したという事実とそれに言及したツイートをもって批判している。であるから、ここで適切だと考えた規準はいささか正確性に欠ける嫌いがある。ここで言うところの「中核の評価基準」で論じるべきかもしれない。しかしMGTOW NEWSも同じく男性皆殺し協会のマニフェストを引用し「とっても素敵」と茶化し皮肉を言っている。これは「その攻撃性を軽視しているように見られかねない発言をしていた場合」と言えなくもない。
所与の条件である今回の批判者は過去の発言と直接的なダブスタをしていないは動くわかげないので困った話である。これをMGTOW NEWSのパラドクスと言う。これを解消するためにこの論考では別の項目、特に「引用における態度」の項を作り表面上逃れることとした。だが後続者の皆さんには正面から向き合ってこの点をブレイクスルーしていただきたい。
小学生並みの感想を言うと何にせよモラルが向上するのは良いことだと思います！覚悟がある人がモラルに寄与するんですね。いいと思う。それは呉座のいいね欄を遡ってる人でも北村氏の件を非難する人でも同様である。その覚悟は敬意をもって記録されるべきだ。
けど、自分は直接の誹謗中傷でなければ遡っても数年くらいかなって思うので私に対してはそのくらいの基準で批判してもらえると助かるかなあ。その範囲でならリツイートだろうとスターだろうといいねだろうと謝罪するので…。ダメですかね。
[※1] ここはみんな合意してくれると思うんだけど中傷ではないという意見の人もいると思うので次の増田で詳しく説明しておきたい。
結論を言うと、容姿を揶揄したと見るか全く言わないようなことを言っているかのような風聞を流したと見るかどちらかにせよ中傷であるという結論だ。
[※2] 一応元ネタは何個かあるが、1つはトランプ政権で大規模な選挙不正は無いと言って事実上の更迭をされたKrebsに対してトランプ大統領の弁護士diGenovaが冗談？として言った”that guy is a class A moron. He should be drawn and quartered. Taken out at dawn and shot.”
