  |
はてなキーワード: Madeとは
www.cortlandstandard.com/stories/free-cash-app-money-rewards-2025-dont-miss-this-exclusive-offer-codes-ultimate-guide,134698
www.cortlandstandard.com/stories/cash-app-free-money-codes-daily-rewards-easily-and-quickly-tips-tricks-march-2025,134699
www.cortlandstandard.com/stories/safe-and-legit-way-to-get-free-cash-app-money-generator-dont-miss-this-exclusive-offer-codes,134700
www.cortlandstandard.com/stories/unlimited-cash-app-free-money-generator-quickly-and-easily-tips-tricks-for-android-and-ios-march,134701
www.cortlandstandard.com/stories/free-cash-app-money-generator-step-by-step-guide-to-instantly-earning-2025,134702
www.cortlandstandard.com/stories/cash-app-money-free-codes-paypal-bitcoin-more-daily-made-easy-earning-guide-for-beginners-march,134703
www.cortlandstandard.com/stories/cash-app-money-generator-get-free-sending-and-receiving-bitcoin-step-by-step-guide-2025,134704
www.cortlandstandard.com/stories/ways-to-earn-free-cash-app-money-legit-free-learn-more-about-known-step-by-step-guide-2025,134705
www.cortlandstandard.com/stories/free-cash-app-money-rewards-2025-dont-miss-this-exclusive-offer-codes-ultimate-guide,134698
www.cortlandstandard.com/stories/cash-app-free-money-codes-daily-rewards-easily-and-quickly-tips-tricks-march-2025,134699
www.cortlandstandard.com/stories/safe-and-legit-way-to-get-free-cash-app-money-generator-dont-miss-this-exclusive-offer-codes,134700
www.cortlandstandard.com/stories/unlimited-cash-app-free-money-generator-quickly-and-easily-tips-tricks-for-android-and-ios-march,134701
www.cortlandstandard.com/stories/free-cash-app-money-generator-step-by-step-guide-to-instantly-earning-2025,134702
www.cortlandstandard.com/stories/cash-app-money-free-codes-paypal-bitcoin-more-daily-made-easy-earning-guide-for-beginners-march,134703
www.cortlandstandard.com/stories/cash-app-money-generator-get-free-sending-and-receiving-bitcoin-step-by-step-guide-2025,134704
www.cortlandstandard.com/stories/ways-to-earn-free-cash-app-money-legit-free-learn-more-about-known-step-by-step-guide-2025,134705
プラグマティズムの哲学的伝統は、19世紀後半のアメリカを起源とし、チャールズ・サンダース・パース（1839-1914）とウィリアム・ジェームズ（1842-1910）によってその基礎が築かれた。両者は「プラグマティズム」という用語を共有しながらも、その方法論的アプローチ、真理概念の解釈、形而上学への姿勢において顕著な差異を示す[1][3]。本報告では、スタンフォード哲学百科事典を中心とした学術的資料に基づき、両者の思想体系を体系的に比較分析する。特にプラグマティック・マキシム（実践主義的格率）の解釈相違、真理理論の対照性、科学的探求と宗教的信念への適用方法の違いに焦点を当て、現代哲学におけるプラグマティズムの多様な展開を理解する基盤を提供する。
パースとジェームズのプラグマティズムは、1870年代にハーバード大学を中心に活動した「メタフィジカル・クラブ」での議論を起源とする[1]。この学際的集団には哲学者、心理学者、法律家が参加し、科学的探求の方法論と伝統的形而上学の再検討が行われた。当時の進化論を中心とした科学的革命が思想的背景に存在し、パースとジェームズはこの知的環境の中でプラグマティズムの核心的概念を発展させた[1][3]。
パースはこの時期に「プラグマティック・マキシム」を定式化し、概念の意味をその実践的帰結に基づいて明確化する方法論を提案した。これに対しジェームズは、パースの論理的厳密性をより広範な人間的関心へ拡張し、宗教的信念や道徳的価値の問題に適用する方向性を示した[1][2]。
パースのアプローチは本質的に科学的探求の論理学として位置付けられる。彼が1878年の論文「How to Make Our Ideas Clear」で提示したプラグマティック・マキシムは、概念的明晰性の第三段階として機能する。具体的には、ある概念の対象がもたらし得る実践的効果を考慮することで、その概念の意味を確定する方法論である[1][3]。例えば「硬さ」の概念は、他の物質に引っかかれないという実験的帰結を通じて定義される。パースはこの格率を伝統的論理学における「明晰判明な観念」の区別を超克する手段と位置付け、形而上学的議論の空虚性を暴く批判的ツールとして活用した[1]。
ジェームズはパースの方法論を受け継ぎつつ、その適用範囲を拡張した。1907年の『プラグマティズム』講義で提示されたアプローチは、哲学的論争を解決する「仲介者」としての機能を強調する[2]。例えば「リスを追いかける人がリスを周回するか」という思考実験では、「周回」の実践的意味を状況に応じて解釈し、論争の不毛さを明示した[1][2]。ジェームズの関心は科学的真理の探求に留まらず、宗教的経験や道徳的価値の領域にまで及んだ。これは彼が「事実への科学的忠誠」と「人間的価値への信頼」を調和させる哲学を求めたことに起因する[2]。
パースのプラグマティック・マキシムは、科学的探求の論理的基盤を確立することを目的とした。彼はこれを「実験室哲学」と形容し、仮説の検証プロセスにおける実験的帰結の予測可能性を重視した[1]。例えば「現実（reality）」の概念は、探求共同体の長期的な合意形成プロセスを通じて構成されると解釈された。この立場は「真理の合意説」へと発展し、科学的方法の客観性を保証する基盤となった[1][3]。
パースの格率解釈の特徴は、概念的意味の「第三の明晰性」を追求する点にある。伝統的論理学が語義的定義（第二の明晰性）に留まるのに対し、パースは概念の実践的運用文脈を分析することで、形而上学的議論の無意味性を暴露する批判的ツールを提供した[1]。例えば「自由意志と決定論」の論争は、両立場の実践的帰結が同一である場合、純粋に言語的な問題に還元されると指摘した[1]。
ジェームズのマキシム解釈は、人間的経験の多様性を包摂する柔軟性を特徴とする。彼はパースの科学的厳密性を保持しつつ、真理を「有用な道具」として再定義した[2]。この立場では、信念の真理性はその実践的有用性によって測定され、宗教的信念のような非科学的領域にも適用可能性が拡張される。ジェームズは『プラグマティズム』において「真理は善の一種である」と述べ、真理性を将来的な経験における予測的成功可能性と関連付けた[2]。
この差異は、両者の真理理論における対照性に明確に表れる。パースが長期的な科学共同体の合意形成を真理の基準とするのに対し、ジェームズは個人的・社会的有用性を重視する[1][2]。ジェームズのアプローチは「真理は作られる（made）」という表現に凝縮され、人間の目的や価値観が真理構成に参与することを認める[2]。
パースの真理理論は「探究の終極的な意見（ultimate opinion）」概念に基づく。彼にとって真理とは、理想的な探求状況において科学的共同体が到達する不可避的な合意を指す[1][3]。この立場は反基礎付け主義的認識論と結びつき、真理を動的な探究プロセスの帰結として位置付ける。パースはこの考え方を「現実主義（realism）」と関連付け、人間の認識から独立した客観的現実の存在を仮定した[1]。
この観点からパースは、ジェームズの真理概念を「過度に主観的」と批判した。特に宗教的信念の真理性を有用性に基づいて認めるジェームズの姿勢は、真理の客観性を損なう危険性を含むと指摘された[1][3]。パース自身は後に自説を「プラグマティシズム」と改称し、ジェームズ流の解釈との距離を明確にした[1]。
ジェームズの真理理論は「真理の道具説（instrumentalism）」として特徴付けられる。彼は『プラグマティズム』で「真理は発生する（happens to an idea）」と述べ、信念の真理性をその実践的有用性と将来的な検証可能性に結び付けた[2]。この立場では、真理は静的対応関係ではなく、動的な経験の流れの中で機能する信念の性質として理解される。
ジェームズの真理概念は多元主義的側面を有し、科学的真理と宗教的真理が異なる文脈で有効性を持つ可能性を認める[2]。例えば「神の仮説」は、それが人間の生活的経験に有意義な影響を与える限りにおいて真理と見なされる[2]。この柔軟性はパースの客観主義的立場との根本的な相違点であり、プラグマティズム内部の思想的緊張を生み出した[1][3]。
パースの形而上学は、科学的探求の対象としての「現実（reality）」概念を中核に据える。彼は現実を「探求の最終的に決定されるもの」と定義し、人間の認識から独立した客観的秩序の存在を仮定した[1][3]。この立場は、彼の記号論（semiotics）と結びつき、現実を記号解釈プロセスの産物として動的に捉える視点を含む。
パースの現実概念は、伝統的経験論の受動的認識モデルを超克する。彼は「アブダクション（仮説形成）」のプロセスを重視し、科学的発見の論理学を構築しようとした[1]。この過程で、現実は単なる感覚所与ではなく、探求共同体の解釈的実践を通じて構成される動的概念として再定義された[1][3]。
ジェームズの形而上学は「純粋経験の形而上学」として知られる。『徹底的経験論』（1912）で展開されたこの立場では、心と物質を「純粋経験」の異なる編成様式として再解釈する[2]。ジェームズは現実を固定的実体ではなく、経験の連続的流動として捉え、プラグマティズムを「未完成の現実」を認めるプロセス哲学として位置付けた[2]。
この経験論的立場は、ジェームズの真理理論と密接に連関する。彼は「現実は作り続けられている（still in the making）」と述べ、人間の目的的活動が現実構成に参与することを強調した[2]。この観点から、パースの科学的現実主義は「完成された現実」を前提とする合理主義的立場として批判された[2]。
パースのプラグマティズムは本質的に科学的方法の哲学的分析として発展した。彼の「アブダクション-演繹-帰納」の三段階論は、仮説形成の論理学を体系化しようとする試みである[1][3]。科学的真理の基準としての共同体合意の重視は、個人の主観性を超えた客観性保証のメカニズムとして機能する。
宗教的信念に対するパースの姿勢は懐疑的であり、科学的探求の方法論と整合しない教義を批判した[1]。ただし彼は後年、「宗教的関心」を科学的探求の動機付けとして位置付ける独自の「宗教的実感論」を展開した[1][3]。
ジェームズは『宗教的経験の諸相』（1902）で、プラグマティズムを宗教的信念の検証に適用した。彼は「神の仮説」の真理性を、それが個人の生活にもたらす実践的効果に基づいて判断する立場を採用した[2]。このアプローチは、超越的神観念を批判しつつ、宗教的経験の心理学的現実性を認める点に特徴がある。
科学的探求に対するジェームズの姿勢は、パースの厳密性よりも人間的価値の統合を重視する。彼は科学と宗教を対立軸ではなく、異なる人間的欲求に応える補完的システムとして位置付けた[2]。この立場は、パースの科学主義的傾向との明確な対照点となる[1][3]。
パースとジェームズのプラグマティズムは、共通の方法論的出発点を持ちながら、その哲学的展開において決定的な分岐を示す。パースが科学的探求の論理的基盤と客観的真理概念を堅持したのに対し、ジェームズは人間的経験の多様性と真理の道具的性質を強調した。この相違は、真理理論・現実認識・宗教的信念への適用方法に体系的な差異をもたらした。
現代哲学におけるプラグマティズムの復興は、この思想的多元性を再評価する動向を示している。パースの科学的厳密性とジェームズの人間中心的柔軟性は、現代の認識論・形而上学・価値論の課題に対し、補完的洞察を提供し得る。今後の研究課題として、両者の思想を統合する新たなプラグマティズムの可能性、および非西洋哲学伝統との対話を通じた発展が考えられる。
Citations:
[1] https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pragmatism/
[2] https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/james/
[3] https://plato.stanford.edu/archIves/sum2010/entries/pragmatism/
コンクリートニキが人気らしいので尻増に乗らせてもらおう。
https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20250215115750 因みに増田は尻相撲専攻とかではない。
若い読者諸兄は雨の日に車に水を掛けられたり、車でスリップしたりした事があるだろうか？多分無いと思う。
でもそれって日本含む少数の国だけの事なのだ。そして日本でも道路に水が溜まらなくなったのは1990年代後半からなのだ。それはアスファルト舗装が変わったせいなんである。
アスファルトの原料は言うまでもなく原油。原油を縦に長い蒸留塔の下で沸騰させる。するとガスとなって蒸発する。
そのガスは上から軽い順に滞留するから塔の途中に管を入れてそのガスを取り出し冷やすと、上からプロパンガス、ガソリン、灯油、軽油、重油、鉱油…と分離出来る。その最後に残ったドロドロのカスみたいなのがアスファルトだ。
こいつは熱すると流動性が出るが冷えると固くなってしかも頑丈だ。そこでこれを道路舗装に使おう、となった。
ただアスファルトだけだとまだ柔さがあるんで、砂利と砂（骨材という）と混ぜたものを熱して道路に撒くのだ。
これを「アスファルト合材」というが、現場では単に合材と呼んでる。
コンクリートはミキサーでガラガラ回しながら90分以内に届けるという縛りがあるそうだが、アスファルト合材の場合は冷えるまでに届けるという縛りがあるからもっとシビアだ。
アチチな状態でダンプに載せたら断熱シートを被せて急いで現場に持っていくのだね。
現場では急いで均した上でロードローラーによる転圧という作業を行う。
押しつぶされた合材は水を通さないアスファルト舗装になる、と言うかなっていた。
アスファルトに石と砂を混ぜたものを押しつぶしたら水通さない地面になるのが当たり前。だから雨になれば水が溜まる。
ところが1990年頃にアメリカの会社がこの当たり前を打ち砕く合材を開発したのだ。それが今使われている「透水性アスファルト」で、日本では合材メーカーがこのライセンスを取得、90年代後半から道路工事に使われる様になり、いつの間にか道路に水が溜まる事が無くなってしまったのだ。
この合材は石と砂の他に木工ボンドみたいなプラスチック系接着剤を混ぜる事で、アスファルトが砕石に「纏わりつく」ような状態になっている。キーマカレーみたいな状態だ。
で、それを転圧すると雷おこしみたいになって隙間が沢山出来る。ここから水が通ってしまうから水が溜まらないという仕組み。
で、実際施工されてみると水たまりが無くなるだけに留まらない利点だらけで、エポックメイキング、ゲームチェンジャー、革命的と言って差し支えないほどの特徴に満ちていたのだった。
車のタイヤには排水の為の溝が沢山刻まれている。なので舗装路を走るとこの溝の角が路面を叩く。
その為に車が走るとゴーッ、とかザーッというロードノイズが発生していた。この為に幹線道路の沿線はとても五月蠅かったのだ。
ところが透水性舗装では穴が沢山空いているからこの騒音が殆ど穴の中に吸収されてしまう。故に舗装工事が終わったら無音でビックリ！となったのだった。
路面が塗れると滑る。特に雨の降り始めは路面のホコリが濡れてグニャグニャになるので格段に滑りやすかった。
だから教習所でも免許の講習でも「雨の降り始めは特にスリップ注意」と口を酸っぱく言われていた。
ところが透水性舗装ではホコリなんて穴の中にすぐに落ちてしまうので全然スリップしない。
表面がごつごつした構造なのでタイヤのゴムがよく路面を掴み、そもそも雨じゃなくてもグリップ力がやたら高い。
雨が降ると路面の水が対向車のヘッドライトを反射して光りまくるので、車線のペイントなんか全然見えなかった。ドライバーは勘で走っていた。
だが透水性舗装ではゴツゴツ路面が光を乱反射させて照り返しが無い。
土の中というのは割と温度が一定。つまり夏は涼しく冬には暖かい。
その土の中への穴が沢山空いてるから夏の暑さがかなり抑制される。またその穴からは水蒸気が出ているので気化熱でも路面の温度を奪う。
普通のアスファルトは夏になると熱で緩んでしまっていた。緩んだ状態で重量車が停車するとその部分が凹んでしまう。だから交差点の停止線付近は轍だらけ。バイクなどはハンドルを取られて危なかった。
特に酷いのはバス停で、バスのタイヤ位置が4つ凹んでしまう。バスがその穴ぼこにハマって前後に揺らしながら脱出、とかが日常茶飯事だった。またその穴に水が溜まり、そこを車が通る時に水はね、バス停の人がびしょびしょなんて事も多かった。
透水性舗装は夏でも流動性が上がらないのでそんな悩みとも全てオサラバ。
なんつーか、それまでの悩みは何だったの？というくらいの優秀さなのだ。
路面に見えるのはアスファルトだけだが、舗装というのはその下の構造も含めて舗装なのだ。ここをきっちりやらないとあっというまに道路が破損してしまう。
まず、1ｍ以上掘下げてまずは砂を入れる。この砂は川砂（公園の砂場の砂）じゃなくて土とブレンドされた黄土色のを使う。理由は川砂は高いから。
その上に45cmくらい砕石を入れる。その上の表面がアスファルトだ。
各資材はその都度締固めをする。この締固めマシーンはランマーっていうよ。
昔はやぐらを組んで巨大丸太を引き上げてから落として締固めしていた。この時にロープを巻く号令に因んで「ヨイトマケ」と呼ばれていたよ。美輪明宏の『ヨイトマケの唄』はこの時に唄われる歌を唄ったものだ。「かーちゃんの為ならエンヤコラ」のアレ。
このヨイトマケに人数が必要なのでオバさんもやっていた。つまり女性のドカタって珍しくなかったのだね。
こういう風に砕石や砂を入れておく理由は、道路が沈まない為だ。
もう一つは流水対策。八潮の事故に見るように、水の流れが出来ると土が持っていかれてしまい空洞が出来てしまう。
砕石を入れると水の流れが分散する。その上で砂にしみ込むように流れるから空洞が出来ないのだね。
透水性舗装では水がどんどん地下に浸みていくから、この砕石層を厚くしないといけない。なので合材代が高いだけじゃなくてその下の構築にもコストが掛かるのだ。
アスファルトの扱いは上で書いたようにシビアだ。それにトラックが黒く汚れる。
なので舗装は「合材班」がやるようになっている会社が多い。その班は同会社の別チームの場合と、下請けの会社がまるまる班という場合とがある。
学校でもあった班だが、実は班というのは旧帝国陸軍の組織を参考にしている。少人数集団で仕事する時に「兵隊時代のアレ」が参照されたってわけだ。
余談だが装備品の数チェックを「員数を当たる」という事もあって、こっちも陸軍由来だ。だがこっちの「員数」は頑なに使わない会社も多かった。
というのも、陸軍では始業時と終業時に装備品の数を必ず数えるのだが、ここで数が合わないと「天皇陛下よりお預かりした物を失くしただと！」と滅茶苦茶に殴られるのだ。
その為に数が合わないものを別の班から盗むというのが常態化していて、盗まれた班も盗み、その班もまた…とやっていてとても陰湿で理不尽で「員数」だけは口にしたくないという人が多かった為だ。
組織的には舗装工事専門のゼネコンがあってその下請けの会社が合材班として動いてるって感じか。その舗装ゼネコンはゼネコンの下に組み込まれてるのでサブコンち呼ばれている。
ビルなどの平たい屋上を陸屋根（ろくやね）と言うんだけど、この陸屋根もアスファルトで防水されているのだ。屋上はタイルやコンクリートに見えるが、それはアスファルトの保護層なのだ。
まず、コンクリの屋上にコールタールを塗る。そこにアスファルトを塗って、ファイバーシートを張り、またアスファルト、って感じで仕上げる。
この時、雨の排水桝の境界もアスファルトで埋めて、一滴たりとも漏れないようにする。
この工事はアスファルトの流動性上げる為にバーナーを使うし汚れるしでメチャきつい仕事だ。
アスファルト塗りが終わったら、スタイロフォームという発泡スチロールを敷き詰めていく。これは下の居室の断熱の為だ。
その上にコンクリートを流して完成だ。このコンクリートは押さえコンクリと呼ばれる。保護＋重しだね。
ただ、アスファルトというのは経年でどんどん固くなってしまう。するとひび割れたりするし、地震で建物が歪むと、その歪みが元に戻ってもアスファルトが切れてしまう。すると雨漏りだ。
経年では15～20年でそうなるが、上にコンクリが被さっているからアスファルトの方は直せないね。
そこでコンクリの上からウレタンを被せて再度防水するのだ。屋上が緑や灰色なのはこのウレタンで防水し直したものだ。
ところで上の説明聞いて、「発泡スチロール＋コンクリが被さっていたら水分が完全に抜けるのって無理じゃね？」と気が付いた人もいるかと思う。
その通りで、その上にウレタンを被せたらその水分は永遠に出て来れない。そして夏になると水蒸気になって体積が1000倍になり…となってしまうと水ぶくれみたいにぷくーっと膨らんでしまうのだ。見た事ある人もあるかと思う。
そこで予めエア抜きの煙突（脱気筒）を付けておくのだ。緑や灰色の屋上によくある煙突はこの為にあるのだね。
戦前のミシンなどの工業用品は黒が多いが、そう云うものの中には「ジャパニング」仕上げのものが多いのだ。
漆器では漆を使うが、工業でのジャパニングはアスファルトを使っていた。
具体的にはアスファルトをテレピン油（松脂の精油）で薄めて塗布する。場合によっては綺麗に仕上げる為に油絵用のメディウム（うすめ液）を混ぜる事もある。
ただ、このアスファルトは一般的な原油精製のやつじゃ上手くいかないのだ。石油が湧き出している所を油徴というのだけど、その中でアスファルトがぐつぐつと湧いている場所がある。そこで取れる「天然アスファルト」じゃないと無理なのだ。
新潟で油が湧きだして困ってるらしいので https://youtu.be/xPAfFJ--vQQ?si=4w3QgifqjSs8Y4UX
今度そこで天然アスファルトを採取して古いミシンのレストアをしてみたいなと考えているのだ。
あと、ジャパンは漆器なんだが、実際は日本の古い陶器の方がアンティークとして人気らしいのだ。
特に敗戦後SF条約締結までの製品には「made in occupied japan」（占領下日本）と表記されているので珍重されているらしい。（made in occupied japan：GHQが表記を義務付けた）
透水性舗装は水を地下に流してしまう。すると仮令水抜きをしっかりしていても高速道路の築堤などは大雨、長雨などで緩んでしまう危険もある。
ところがこれに最適なソリューションが開発されたのだ。
それはなんと、築堤の下の方を発泡スチロールで組んでしまうというもの。
あんなもので大丈夫なのか？と思うが、下の方は力が分散されるから大丈夫らしい。
それに地震に強いという利点も。土に振動を与えると密度が詰まって体積が小さくなる。このせいで路面が狂ったりするが発泡スチロールなら無問題。
発泡スチロールは軽い。という事は基礎に掛かる力も少ないって事で、自重で沈んでいくのを防止できる。
そして発泡スチロールの上に砕石層→アスファルトとすれば水で土が流れて陥没という事故も無くなるという算段。
現在道路は燃料税が中心になって維持されている。電気自動車勢は無税で道路走ってるわけで怪しからんですな。
もしEVシフトが進んでしまうと道路維持費の問題の他に、「アスファルトどうすんねん」問題が出てくるわけです。現在の燃料油取った余りみたいな扱いから、「アスファルトだけの為に原油精製する」となったらコスト爆上がりでしょう。
でも実際はEVシフトは然程進まないと思うけど。自家用車では進むだろうが、トラックやバスのディーゼルを置き換えるのは当分無理だと思われるので。
外国行った際には是非アスファルトにも注目して日本との違いを見て欲しい。水たまり、ロードノイズの差、照り返し、溶けて歪んだ路面のペイントなど。
First dates can be exciting and nerve-wracking all at once. You’re meeting someone new, learning about their interests, and trying to figure out if there’s chemistry between you. And then there’s flirting, that delicate dance of showing someone you’re interested without being too forward or awkward.
Flirting doesn’t have to be a high-pressure situation. In fact, it can be the most fun part of getting to know someone. Whether you're meeting someone on MixerDates or any other platform, the most important thing is to be genuine, stay calm, and let the connection develop naturally.
If you’ve ever found yourself wondering how to flirt on a first date without feeling uncomfortable, you’re not alone. Everyone has their awkward moments, but the more you understand the art of flirting, the easier it becomes. In this article, we’ll break down how to flirt in a way that feels natural, exciting, and authentic to who you are. So, let's dive in and learn how to make the most of your first date experience—without overthinking it.
When it comes to flirting, confidence is key. But what does it really mean to be confident on a first date? Confidence doesn’t mean you need to be perfect, or even outgoing—it simply means being comfortable in your own skin and showing up as your authentic self.
Have you ever noticed how people are drawn to those who radiate self-assurance? It’s not about bragging or dominating the conversation—it’s about presenting yourself with ease. If you feel good about yourself, it will naturally show. A great smile, good posture, and eye contact can go a long way in making a good first impression.
For instance, think about the last time someone walked into a room and immediately caught your attention—not because they were the most attractive person in the room, but because of their energy. They were confident, they were present, and they made you feel at ease. That’s the kind of confidence you want to project on your date.
When you're confident, you're not worried about saying the perfect thing. Instead, you focus on enjoying the moment, making the other person feel comfortable, and letting the connection happen naturally. That’s the magic of confidence—it allows you to be present, fun, and, most importantly, yourself.
Let’s face it—no one wants to feel like they’re being “worked” or put through a game. That’s why subtlety is such a powerful tool when it comes to flirting. It's all about showing interest without being over-the-top or too obvious.
Flirting doesn’t always mean complimenting someone non-stop or using cheesy pickup lines. In fact, the most successful flirting is the kind that happens behind the scenes—subtle, playful, and lighthearted. Think about the little moments, like a teasing comment about how they always order the same thing at a restaurant or the way you laugh at a silly joke they make.
The key is to find a balance. A simple smile or a playful comment can convey interest without being too much. For example, if your date tells you they love hiking but they tend to get lost easily, you could say something like, “So, you’re telling me you need a personal guide? I could get behind that!” It’s lighthearted, humorous, and most importantly, it keeps the conversation fun without putting too much pressure on the situation.
By keeping it subtle, you allow your date to feel at ease. It takes the pressure off them to be perfect and allows both of you to enjoy the interaction more naturally. Flirting doesn’t need to be a performance—it’s about creating an environment where both of you can feel comfortable and authentic.
Now, let’s talk about something incredibly important in the flirting game: active listening. When we’re on a date, we often get caught up in thinking about what to say next, how we’re coming across, or if we’re being interesting enough. But the best way to make an impression? Truly listening to your date.
Active listening means you’re fully engaged in the conversation, giving your date your full attention and responding thoughtfully. It’s about showing that you care about what they’re saying and that you’re genuinely interested in getting to know them better. When you listen actively, you’re also giving them space to open up, and that can create an immediate connection.
For example, if your date mentions they recently traveled to Japan, instead of simply saying, “That’s cool!” you could follow up with something like, “What was the most memorable experience you had there?” This shows that you’re not just hearing their words but are genuinely curious and invested in their experiences. It’s a great way to build rapport and let them know you’re not just there to impress them—you’re there to connect.
While your words are important, body language often speaks louder than anything you can say. Whether you realize it or not, your body is constantly communicating how you feel. How you sit, stand, and move tells your date whether you’re relaxed, engaged, or distracted.
Small gestures can go a long way in flirting. A light touch on the arm, a subtle lean in when they’re speaking, or maintaining good eye contact—all these body language cues help signal your interest. And the great thing is, when done naturally, these cues can be just as effective as words.
For example, if you’re sitting at a café on your date and you lean in slightly when they’re sharing a funny story, you’re not just showing that you’re interested—you’re inviting them into your space. It’s an invitation to connect further. And when they respond by leaning in too, that’s when the magic happens—the unspoken connection that tells you both that there’s potential for more.
Flirting through body language doesn’t mean making grand gestures or being overly touchy. It’s about being present and showing that you’re engaged with your date in a subtle, but meaningful way.
It’s easy to get caught up in overthinking how to flirt or trying to figure out if your date is into you. But here’s a secret—when you let go of the pressure and allow yourself to have fun, everything flows much more naturally. Flirting on a first date doesn’t need to feel like a test or an assignment. It’s supposed to be a fun, lighthearted experience that sets the stage for more great dates ahead.
When was the last time you had a genuinely fun date? Was it when you were trying too hard to impress, or when you were both laughing, chatting, and enjoying each other's company? Flirting becomes effortless when you're present, enjoying the moment, and letting the connection grow naturally.
Sometimes, it's the small moments—like sharing a laugh or swapping embarrassing stories—that make a first date truly special. When you focus on having fun, you create an environment where both of you can relax, flirt, and let the chemistry grow. That’s the secret to a great date.
One of the best things about using a platform like MixerDates is that it takes the guesswork out of the equation. By connecting with someone who already shares your interests and values, you’ve got a head start on making a real connection. No more swiping through countless profiles hoping for a spark—on MixerDates, you already know there’s something in common.
When you’re already on the same page with your date, flirting comes more easily. There’s less of that awkward, “Are we even on the same wavelength?” feeling, and more of the fun, “Wow, we really click!” vibe. Whether you’re talking about favorite hobbies, movies, or life goals, the conversation flows naturally, making the flirting feel effortless.
If you're looking for a place to meet like-minded people and build genuine connections, MixerDates is the perfect platform. It's a great place to find someone who appreciates you for who you are and who you can naturally flirt with, without the stress.
Flirting on a first date is all about confidence, connection, and fun. When you let go of the pressure and focus on enjoying the experience, the chemistry will naturally follow. Remember, the best way to flirt is by being yourself—let your personality shine through, listen with intention, and embrace the moment.
And if you’re ready to meet someone new, who’s just as interested in making a connection as you are, MixerDates is the perfect place to start. So go ahead, take the leap, and see where it leads. Who knows? Your next great connection might be just a click away.
Sign up for MixerDates today and start your journey to exciting first dates and meaningful connections!
Please consider the histroy of humanity from biological perpsecitve and current known fact in nearby universe, which expo-planet (from the Sol system perspective) is most likely to have civlizaed society? Please add percentage next to it in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanet civilization likelihoodを28 秒行う
Evaluating planetary prospects
OK, I’m looking at the likelihood of a civilized society on an exoplanet within our Solar System. I’ll consider biological history and current space knowledge, aiming to identify the most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from our Solar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard's Star, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1, focusing on their habitable zones and available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilized society likelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m noting key exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which have Earth-like characteristics and are in habitable zones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advanced civilizations.
I'm gathering info on planets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, considering factors like magnetic fields, atmospheres, and proximity to G-type stars for their potential to support advanced civilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despite being close and around a red dwarf star, might support life if it has a magnetic field and atmosphere. This makes me think about its potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimating civilization probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculative percentages based on the Drake equation and the lack of evidence for intelligent life.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names and civilization likelihood percentages, grounded in the long timeline of life's evolution, despite the speculative nature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering their star types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advanced civilizations from our solar system's viewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due to its closeness and observational potential, despite concerns about its flare star dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'm focusing on exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, and K2-18b, aiming to chart their likelihood of hosting a civilized society based on current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society, considering Earth's long biological history.
Refining odds
I'm considering the astronomical timeline for intelligent life on Earth, leading me to assign even lower speculative odds for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrary percentages, clearly noting the speculative nature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience's basic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrary percentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculative nature, and ensuring the data is accessible for young audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating a markdown table with speculative percentages for the likelihood of civilized life on exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoretical nature and considering the understanding level of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mapping out a markdown chart with speculative percentages for the likelihood of a civilized society on exoplanets, mindful of the complexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecing together markdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b's reduced civilized life chance due to the red dwarf's activity. This inclusion highlights the speculative nature of the analysis.
Piecing together speculative odds
I’m detailing a markdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanet likelihoods, considering environmental challenges and adding a disclaimer about the speculative nature and lack of evidence.
Piecing together
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b for its proximity and silent star, but I’ll add a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advanced civilizations' hypothetical likelihood.
Assessing civilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligent life on Earth, which suggests that the odds of any habitable planet developing a complex civilization might be as low as a few percent.
Below is a very speculative chart that—based on what we know about Earth’s long, winding path from simple life to a “civilized society” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives some fun, made‑up percentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists have not yet found any proof of life (let alone advanced civilizations) on any exoplanet. These numbers are just playful estimates to help you think about the ideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an Advanced Civilization on Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet Estimated Likelihood of a Civilized Society
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
How Did We (Very Roughly) Guess These Numbers?
Earth’s Example:
On Earth, life began as simple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that built complex societies. This long journey suggests that—even if a planet is in the “habitable zone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilized society might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
This is the closest exoplanet to us. Even though its star (Proxima Centauri) is a red dwarf that sometimes sends out strong flares (which might harm life), its closeness makes it one of our most interesting candidates. That’s why we give it a slightly higher guess (~2%).
These planets are part of a group orbiting a very cool star. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaning one side always faces the star), so the chance of a complex, advanced civilization might be a bit lower.
LHS 1140 b:
This planet is promising in some ways but is a little farther away and around a dimmer star, so our playful estimate is even lower.
All of these percentages are extremely rough guesses based on what little we understand about the conditions for life and intelligence. Scientists use ideas like the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concrete evidence, these numbers remain just for fun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring these ideas—and remember, space is full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equation itself and see if this euqation is acculate or more opition in the equation you will use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation's value
OK, let me see. The Drake Equation isn't a precise formula; it's more of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrial civilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluating its conceptual nature, its uncertain parameters, and its criticism to conclude on its reliability as an accurate predictive model.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mapping out the Drake Equation as a conceptual guide, detailing its parameters, which are often based on estimates or opinions, to evaluate its reliability for predicting extraterrestrial civilizations.
The Drake Equation is a famous formula that was created to help scientists think about the many factors involved in estimating the number of detectable extraterrestrial civilizations in our galaxy. However, when we look at the equation closely, we see that it is more of a conceptual framework or heuristic tool than a precise, predictive formula. Let’s break down why:
The equation is usually written as:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The average rate of star formation per year in our galaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of those stars that have planetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The average number of planets that could potentially support life per star with planets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of those planets where life actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction of planets with life where intelligent life evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction of civilizations that develop technology that releases detectable signals into space.
𝐿
L: The length of time such civilizations release detectable signals.
Why the Drake Equation Is More of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction of stars with planets), have become better known through modern astronomy.
The parameters related to the development of life and intelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—are based on very limited data. For example, Earth is the only planet we know where life has developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for these factors. This means that the values chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of Possible Values:
Because many of these factors are not well-constrained, if you change one of the more uncertain parameters even slightly, the final estimate for
𝑁
N (the number of civilizations) can vary by many orders of magnitude. This wide range shows that the equation can lead to very different outcomes based on personal or theoretical assumptions.
The Drake Equation was never meant to provide a precise answer. Instead, it serves as a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrial civilizations. It encourages discussion about the relative importance of different factors and highlights where our scientific knowledge is limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate or More Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In the sense of being a strict mathematical model with well-defined inputs and predictable outputs, the Drake Equation is not accurate. Its accuracy is limited by the extreme uncertainties in several of its key parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning the evolution of life and intelligence, are based on opinion, interpretation, and the single example of Earth. Therefore, while the structure of the equation is logical, the numbers you put into it (and hence the final result) are often more reflective of our current opinions and assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equation is a valuable tool for framing the question of extraterrestrial life. It helps scientists and enthusiasts break down a complex problem into smaller, more manageable questions. However, because several of its factors are highly uncertain and subject to personal interpretation, it is more of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of the number of extraterrestrial civilizations.
In summary, while the Drake Equation is useful for thinking about the various factors that might lead to the emergence of a civilization, its outputs should be taken as highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the long history of Sol system and nearby planets and see if there is any possiblites that in one time intelligent life emerged in nearby planets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-human intelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-human intelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligent life forms in the Sol system and neighboring planets, and how this might factor into the equation.
Piecing together possibilities
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligent life, possibly on Mars or Europa, into the Drake Equation for the Sol system and neighboring planets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligent life emerging on Mars or Venus, though Earth remains the only known life-supporting planet in the solar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligent life could have emerged on planets like Mars, Venus, or Europa, and how this possibility aligns with the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligent life on Mars or Venus could intersect with the assumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems to focus solely on Earth-based evolution.
I’m piecing together the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligent life in the solar system. Mars, Venus, and Titan present challenges, but Europa and Enceladus might harbor microbial life.
Please consider the histroy of humanity from biological perpsecitve and current known fact in nearby universe, which expo-planet (from the Sol system perspective) is most likely to have civlizaed society? Please add percentage next to it in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanet civilization likelihoodを28 秒行う
Evaluating planetary prospects
OK, I’m looking at the likelihood of a civilized society on an exoplanet within our Solar System. I’ll consider biological history and current space knowledge, aiming to identify the most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from our Solar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard's Star, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1, focusing on their habitable zones and available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilized society likelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m noting key exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which have Earth-like characteristics and are in habitable zones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advanced civilizations.
I'm gathering info on planets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, considering factors like magnetic fields, atmospheres, and proximity to G-type stars for their potential to support advanced civilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despite being close and around a red dwarf star, might support life if it has a magnetic field and atmosphere. This makes me think about its potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimating civilization probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculative percentages based on the Drake equation and the lack of evidence for intelligent life.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names and civilization likelihood percentages, grounded in the long timeline of life's evolution, despite the speculative nature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering their star types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advanced civilizations from our solar system's viewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due to its closeness and observational potential, despite concerns about its flare star dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'm focusing on exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, and K2-18b, aiming to chart their likelihood of hosting a civilized society based on current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society, considering Earth's long biological history.
Refining odds
I'm considering the astronomical timeline for intelligent life on Earth, leading me to assign even lower speculative odds for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrary percentages, clearly noting the speculative nature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience's basic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrary percentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculative nature, and ensuring the data is accessible for young audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating a markdown table with speculative percentages for the likelihood of civilized life on exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoretical nature and considering the understanding level of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mapping out a markdown chart with speculative percentages for the likelihood of a civilized society on exoplanets, mindful of the complexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecing together markdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b's reduced civilized life chance due to the red dwarf's activity. This inclusion highlights the speculative nature of the analysis.
Piecing together speculative odds
I’m detailing a markdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanet likelihoods, considering environmental challenges and adding a disclaimer about the speculative nature and lack of evidence.
Piecing together
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b for its proximity and silent star, but I’ll add a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advanced civilizations' hypothetical likelihood.
Assessing civilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligent life on Earth, which suggests that the odds of any habitable planet developing a complex civilization might be as low as a few percent.
Below is a very speculative chart that—based on what we know about Earth’s long, winding path from simple life to a “civilized society” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives some fun, made‑up percentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists have not yet found any proof of life (let alone advanced civilizations) on any exoplanet. These numbers are just playful estimates to help you think about the ideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an Advanced Civilization on Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet Estimated Likelihood of a Civilized Society
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
How Did We (Very Roughly) Guess These Numbers?
Earth’s Example:
On Earth, life began as simple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that built complex societies. This long journey suggests that—even if a planet is in the “habitable zone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilized society might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
This is the closest exoplanet to us. Even though its star (Proxima Centauri) is a red dwarf that sometimes sends out strong flares (which might harm life), its closeness makes it one of our most interesting candidates. That’s why we give it a slightly higher guess (~2%).
These planets are part of a group orbiting a very cool star. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaning one side always faces the star), so the chance of a complex, advanced civilization might be a bit lower.
LHS 1140 b:
This planet is promising in some ways but is a little farther away and around a dimmer star, so our playful estimate is even lower.
All of these percentages are extremely rough guesses based on what little we understand about the conditions for life and intelligence. Scientists use ideas like the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concrete evidence, these numbers remain just for fun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring these ideas—and remember, space is full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equation itself and see if this euqation is acculate or more opition in the equation you will use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation's value
OK, let me see. The Drake Equation isn't a precise formula; it's more of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrial civilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluating its conceptual nature, its uncertain parameters, and its criticism to conclude on its reliability as an accurate predictive model.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mapping out the Drake Equation as a conceptual guide, detailing its parameters, which are often based on estimates or opinions, to evaluate its reliability for predicting extraterrestrial civilizations.
The Drake Equation is a famous formula that was created to help scientists think about the many factors involved in estimating the number of detectable extraterrestrial civilizations in our galaxy. However, when we look at the equation closely, we see that it is more of a conceptual framework or heuristic tool than a precise, predictive formula. Let’s break down why:
The equation is usually written as:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The average rate of star formation per year in our galaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of those stars that have planetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The average number of planets that could potentially support life per star with planets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of those planets where life actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction of planets with life where intelligent life evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction of civilizations that develop technology that releases detectable signals into space.
𝐿
L: The length of time such civilizations release detectable signals.
Why the Drake Equation Is More of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction of stars with planets), have become better known through modern astronomy.
The parameters related to the development of life and intelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—are based on very limited data. For example, Earth is the only planet we know where life has developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for these factors. This means that the values chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of Possible Values:
Because many of these factors are not well-constrained, if you change one of the more uncertain parameters even slightly, the final estimate for
𝑁
N (the number of civilizations) can vary by many orders of magnitude. This wide range shows that the equation can lead to very different outcomes based on personal or theoretical assumptions.
The Drake Equation was never meant to provide a precise answer. Instead, it serves as a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrial civilizations. It encourages discussion about the relative importance of different factors and highlights where our scientific knowledge is limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate or More Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In the sense of being a strict mathematical model with well-defined inputs and predictable outputs, the Drake Equation is not accurate. Its accuracy is limited by the extreme uncertainties in several of its key parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning the evolution of life and intelligence, are based on opinion, interpretation, and the single example of Earth. Therefore, while the structure of the equation is logical, the numbers you put into it (and hence the final result) are often more reflective of our current opinions and assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equation is a valuable tool for framing the question of extraterrestrial life. It helps scientists and enthusiasts break down a complex problem into smaller, more manageable questions. However, because several of its factors are highly uncertain and subject to personal interpretation, it is more of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of the number of extraterrestrial civilizations.
In summary, while the Drake Equation is useful for thinking about the various factors that might lead to the emergence of a civilization, its outputs should be taken as highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the long history of Sol system and nearby planets and see if there is any possiblites that in one time intelligent life emerged in nearby planets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-human intelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-human intelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligent life forms in the Sol system and neighboring planets, and how this might factor into the equation.
Piecing together possibilities
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligent life, possibly on Mars or Europa, into the Drake Equation for the Sol system and neighboring planets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligent life emerging on Mars or Venus, though Earth remains the only known life-supporting planet in the solar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligent life could have emerged on planets like Mars, Venus, or Europa, and how this possibility aligns with the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligent life on Mars or Venus could intersect with the assumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems to focus solely on Earth-based evolution.
I’m piecing together the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligent life in the solar system. Mars, Venus, and Titan present challenges, but Europa and Enceladus might harbor microbial life.
https://mainichi.jp/articles/20250128/k00/00m/040/152000c
https://hochi.news/articles/20250128-OHT1T51069.html?page=1
※ヤクルトは大株主の1社（https://www.fujimediahd.co.jp/ir/s_information.html）
https://newsdig.tbs.co.jp/articles/-/1694816?display=1
Nicholas Benes, chief executive officer of the Board Director Training Institute of Japan, said the press conference had made the situation worse.
“It was a shambolic 10 hours because they did not have clear answers regarding the basis and justification for how the board acted,” he said in an email.
（The Board Director Training Institute of Japan の最高経営責任者であるニコラス・ベネス氏は、記者会見は事態をさらに悪化させた と述べた。
「取締役会がどのように行動したかの根拠と正当性に関して明確な答えを持っていなかったため、10時間にも及ぶ会見は混乱を極めていた」と彼はメールで述べた。)
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/28/world/asia/japan-tv-executives-sex-abuse.html
The president and chairman of Fuji Television resigned on Monday night after acknowledging they mishandled an incident in which a star TV host admitted paying hush money to an unnamed woman for an incident that took place in June 2023. The case has plunged the broadcaster into financial crisis as major corporations pulled ads to protest Fuji TV’s failure to take action, despite learning of the incident right after it happened.
The ad boycott has turned into a watershed moment, directing public anger against not only the TV star, Masahiro Nakai, a former member of a celebrated boy idol band who later became a popular show host, but also his employer. Fuji TV has faced allegations that staff helped arrange the original encounter with the woman and that management looked the other way as Mr. Nakai tried to cover it up.
フジテレビの社長と会長は月曜日の夜、2023年6月に起きた事件について、スターテレビ司会者が匿名の女性に口止め料を支払ったことを認めた事件への対応を誤ったことを認め、辞任した。この事件は、主要企業がフジテレビの対応を抗議して広告を撤回したため、同放送局を財政危機に陥らせた。フジテレビは事件発生直後にそれを知っていたにもかかわらず、行動を起こさなかった。
広告ボイコットは転換点となり、世間の怒りは、人気番組司会者となった有名なアイドルグループの元メンバーであるテレビ司会者のMasahiro Nakaiだけでなく、彼の雇用主であるフジテレビにも向けられた。フジテレビは、スタッフが女性との最初の出会いを手配するのを手伝い、中居氏がそれを隠蔽しようとした際、経営陣が見て見ぬふりをしたという疑惑に直面している。
検索ワード：Japanese TV host's sex scandal
検索ワード：Japanese TV Sex Abuse Case
https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20250129101357
（https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20250128194248# ← URLが多くなってきて貼れなくなったので分割しました）
港前社長：確かに女性側のヒアリングが欠けているというところはあるかもしれませんが、当該社員と中居氏のヒアリングと履歴を精査した結果、これは関与していないというふうに信じるに足ると思っております
https://www.youtube.com/live/WfGbrstX2Kc?t=18074 ← ここから文字起こした発言が確認できる
港前社長：あります。そして機能しています。特殊な案件だから上げなかった
港前社長：女性のために上げなかった。特殊という表現は女性の希望に応えながら対応していくのが特殊という意味
港前社長：コンプライアンス室に上げると多くの人が知ることになると考え上げなかった。対応が正しかったと思っていない。（社内システムを) しっかり機能をさせるべきだったと反省している
https://www.youtube.com/live/WfGbrstX2Kc?t=5480 ← ここから文字起こした発言が確認できる
https://www.youtube.com/live/WfGbrstX2Kc?t=12572 ← ここから文字起こした発言が確認できる
https://mainichi.jp/articles/20250128/k00/00m/040/152000c
https://hochi.news/articles/20250128-OHT1T51069.html?page=1
※ヤクルトは大株主の1社（https://www.fujimediahd.co.jp/ir/s_information.html）
https://newsdig.tbs.co.jp/articles/-/1694816?display=1
Nicholas Benes, chief executive officer of the Board Director Training Institute of Japan, said the press conference had made the situation worse.
“It was a shambolic 10 hours because they did not have clear answers regarding the basis and justification for how the board acted,” he said in an email.
（The Board Director Training Institute of Japan の最高経営責任者であるニコラス・ベネス氏は、記者会見は事態をさらに悪化させた と述べた。
「取締役会がどのように行動したかの根拠と正当性に関して明確な答えを持っていなかったため、10時間にも及ぶ会見は混乱を極めていた」と彼はメールで述べた。)
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/28/world/asia/japan-tv-executives-sex-abuse.html
The president and chairman of Fuji Television resigned on Monday night after acknowledging they mishandled an incident in which a star TV host admitted paying hush money to an unnamed woman for an incident that took place in June 2023. The case has plunged the broadcaster into financial crisis as major corporations pulled ads to protest Fuji TV’s failure to take action, despite learning of the incident right after it happened.
The ad boycott has turned into a watershed moment, directing public anger against not only the TV star, Masahiro Nakai, a former member of a celebrated boy idol band who later became a popular show host, but also his employer. Fuji TV has faced allegations that staff helped arrange the original encounter with the woman and that management looked the other way as Mr. Nakai tried to cover it up.
フジテレビの社長と会長は月曜日の夜、2023年6月に起きた事件について、スターテレビ司会者が匿名の女性に口止め料を支払ったことを認めた事件への対応を誤ったことを認め、辞任した。この事件は、主要企業がフジテレビの対応を抗議して広告を撤回したため、同放送局を財政危機に陥らせた。フジテレビは事件発生直後にそれを知っていたにもかかわらず、行動を起こさなかった。
広告ボイコットは転換点となり、世間の怒りは、人気番組司会者となった有名なアイドルグループの元メンバーであるテレビ司会者のMasahiro Nakaiだけでなく、彼の雇用主であるフジテレビにも向けられた。フジテレビは、スタッフが女性との最初の出会いを手配するのを手伝い、中居氏がそれを隠蔽しようとした際、経営陣が見て見ぬふりをしたという疑惑に直面している。
検索ワード：Japanese TV host's sex scandal
https://mainichi.jp/articles/20250128/k00/00m/040/152000c
https://hochi.news/articles/20250128-OHT1T51069.html?page=1
※ヤクルトは大株主の1社（https://www.fujimediahd.co.jp/ir/s_information.html）
https://newsdig.tbs.co.jp/articles/-/1694816?display=1
Nicholas Benes, chief executive officer of the Board Director Training Institute of Japan, said the press conference had made the situation worse.
“It was a shambolic 10 hours because they did not have clear answers regarding the basis and justification for how the board acted,” he said in an email.
（The Board Director Training Institute of Japan の最高経営責任者であるニコラス・ベネス氏は、記者会見は事態をさらに悪化させた と述べた。
「取締役会がどのように行動したかの根拠と正当性に関して明確な答えを持っていなかったため、10時間にも及ぶ会見は混乱を極めていた」と彼はメールで述べた。)
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/28/world/asia/japan-tv-executives-sex-abuse.html
The president and chairman of Fuji Television resigned on Monday night after acknowledging they mishandled an incident in which a star TV host admitted paying hush money to an unnamed woman for an incident that took place in June 2023. The case has plunged the broadcaster into financial crisis as major corporations pulled ads to protest Fuji TV’s failure to take action, despite learning of the incident right after it happened.
The ad boycott has turned into a watershed moment, directing public anger against not only the TV star, Masahiro Nakai, a former member of a celebrated boy idol band who later became a popular show host, but also his employer. Fuji TV has faced allegations that staff helped arrange the original encounter with the woman and that management looked the other way as Mr. Nakai tried to cover it up.
フジテレビの社長と会長は月曜日の夜、2023年6月に起きた事件について、スターテレビ司会者が匿名の女性に口止め料を支払ったことを認めた事件への対応を誤ったことを認め、辞任した。この事件は、主要企業がフジテレビの対応を抗議して広告を撤回したため、同放送局を財政危機に陥らせた。フジテレビは事件発生直後にそれを知っていたにもかかわらず、行動を起こさなかった。
広告ボイコットは転換点となり、世間の怒りは、人気番組司会者となった有名なアイドルグループの元メンバーであるテレビ司会者のMasahiro Nakaiだけでなく、彼の雇用主であるフジテレビにも向けられた。フジテレビは、スタッフが女性との最初の出会いを手配するのを手伝い、中居氏がそれを隠蔽しようとした際、経営陣が見て見ぬふりをしたという疑惑に直面している。
検索ワード：Japanese TV host's sex scandal
昨年12月26日発売号では、事件当日の会食について「X子さんはフジ編成幹部A氏に誘われた」としていました。しかし、その後の取材により「X子さんは中居氏に誘われた」「A氏がセッティングしている会の”延長”と認識していた」ということが判明したため、 1月8日発売号以降は、その後の取材成果を踏まえた内容を報じています。
12月26日発売号に掲載された記事は現在でも「週刊文春 電子版」で読むことができますが、お詫びした上で、修正を追記しています。
これまで報じたように、事件直前A氏はX子さんを中居氏宅でのバーベキューに連れて行くなどしています。またX子さんも小誌の取材に対して、「（事件は）Aさんがセッティングしている会の“延長”だったことは間違いありません」と証言しています。以上の経緯からA氏が件のトラブルに関与した事実は変わらないと考えています。
このたび一部週刊誌等の記事において、弊社社員に関する報道がありました。
内容については事実でないことが含まれており、記事中にある食事会に関しても、当該社員は会の設定を含め一切関与しておりません。
会の存在自体も認識しておらず、当日、突然欠席した事実もございません。
発行元に対してもその旨伝えておりました。
(略)
なお、今回の件に関して、ＳＮＳ等で弊社社員および関係者に関する憶測による記事・投稿が見られます。
↓
40分後、回ってきた紙を見て、大きな溜息をつく遠藤氏
↓
↓
※関係ないけど、遠藤氏の父 遠藤周作の『沈黙』見る時、氏の姿がチラつきそう・・・。親子情報知らないままでいたかった😞
（女性は医師を通してしか面会が出来ない状態だったこともあるとのこと)
記者：通信履歴を調べたという結果のみで、なぜ（関与を）すぐに断定する発言ができたのか？
↓
港前社長：確かに女性側のヒアリングが欠けているというところはあるかもしれませんが、当該社員と中居氏のヒアリングと履歴を精査した結果、これは関与していないというふうに信じるに足ると思っております
↓
記者：女性のヒアリングが欠けていたのに、どうしてA氏の関与がなかったと言い切れるのでしょう。履歴は後で消すこともできますが、それを信用できるところはどこにあるのでしょうか
↓
↓
記者：社内で噂が広まれば、やばいと思えば履歴を消しますよね。それができなかったということを確証を持って言えるのですか
↓
【完全版】午前2時半まで10時間超…フジテレビ異例の超ロング「やり直し」会見 怒号飛び交い紛糾 中居正広さんのトラブル説明 日枝相談役は姿見せず 港社長・嘉納会長は辞任 (2025年1月27日) https://www.youtube.com/live/WfGbrstX2Kc?t=18074 ← ここから文字起こした発言が確認できる
記者：コンプライアンス室に共有していなかったという話があったがそれは事実か？
↓
↓
記者：トラブルがあった際、通常、型に沿ってコンプライアンス室に相談するシステムだと思うが、フジテレビにはそれがなかったのか？
↓
港前社長：あります。そして機能しています。特殊な案件だから上げなかった
↓
記者：特殊案件だからコンプライアンス室へ上げないと港社長が決めたという話があったが、何故、社内システムを使わなかったのか？
↓
港前社長：女性のために上げなかった。特殊という表現は女性の希望に応えながら対応していくのが特殊という意味
↓
記者：コンプライアンス室に上げてしまうとそういった対応が出来ないということか？だとすると、また次回も会社として同じ対応になるのではないか？
↓
港前社長：コンプライアンス室に上げると多くの人が知ることになると考え上げなかった。対応が正しかったと思っていない。（社内システムを) しっかり機能をさせるべきだったと反省している
【完全版】午前2時半まで10時間超…フジテレビ異例の超ロング「やり直し」会見 怒号飛び交い紛糾 中居正広さんのトラブル説明 日枝相談役は姿見せず 港社長・嘉納会長は辞任 (2025年1月27日) https://www.youtube.com/live/WfGbrstX2Kc?t=5480 ← ここから文字起こした発言が確認できる https://www.youtube.com/live/WfGbrstX2Kc?t=12572 ← ここから文字起こした発言が確認できる
ttps://mainichi.jp/articles/20250128/k00/00m/040/152000c
ttps://hochi.news/articles/20250128-OHT1T51069.html?page=1
※ヤクルトは大株主の1社（https://www.fujimediahd.co.jp/ir/s_information.html）
https://newsdig.tbs.co.jp/articles/-/1694816?display=1
ttps://www.scmp.com/news/asia/east-asia/article/3296538/japans-sex-scandal-hit-fuji-tv-holds-marathon-face-saving-news-event
Nicholas Benes, chief executive officer of the Board Director Training Institute of Japan, said the press conference had made the situation worse.
“It was a shambolic 10 hours because they did not have clear answers regarding the basis and justification for how the board acted,” he said in an email.
（The Board Director Training Institute of Japan の最高経営責任者であるニコラス・ベネス氏は、記者会見は事態をさらに悪化させた と述べた。
「取締役会がどのように行動したかの根拠と正当性に関して明確な答えを持っていなかったため、10時間にも及ぶ会見は混乱を極めていた」と彼はメールで述べた。)
ttps://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/28/world/asia/japan-tv-executives-sex-abuse.html
The president and chairman of Fuji Television resigned on Monday night after acknowledging they mishandled an incident in which a star TV host admitted paying hush money to an unnamed woman for an incident that took place in June 2023. The case has plunged the broadcaster into financial crisis as major corporations pulled ads to protest Fuji TV’s failure to take action, despite learning of the incident right after it happened.
The ad boycott has turned into a watershed moment, directing public anger against not only the TV star, Masahiro Nakai, a former member of a celebrated boy idol band who later became a popular show host, but also his employer. Fuji TV has faced allegations that staff helped arrange the original encounter with the woman and that management looked the other way as Mr. Nakai tried to cover it up.
フジテレビの社長と会長は月曜日の夜、2023年6月に起きた事件について、スターテレビ司会者が匿名の女性に口止め料を支払ったことを認めた事件への対応を誤ったことを認め、辞任した。この事件は、主要企業がフジテレビの対応を抗議して広告を撤回したため、同放送局を財政危機に陥らせた。フジテレビは事件発生直後にそれを知っていたにもかかわらず、行動を起こさなかった。
広告ボイコットは転換点となり、世間の怒りは、人気番組司会者となった有名なアイドルグループの元メンバーであるテレビ司会者のMasahiro Nakaiだけでなく、彼の雇用主であるフジテレビにも向けられた。フジテレビは、スタッフが女性との最初の出会いを手配するのを手伝い、中居氏がそれを隠蔽しようとした際、経営陣が見て見ぬふりをしたという疑惑に直面している。
検索ワード：Japanese TV host's sex scandal
検索ワード：Japanese TV Sex Abuse Case
⭐️ここだけ知っておけばよさそうな1月27日のフジテレビ会見
https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20250129101357#
https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20250129102148#
🐈ﾈｺﾁｬﾝは足が小さいので、子供用のスニーカーを買うことがあるよ。
【NEW BALANCE/ニューバランス】M991EKS/ブラック・MADE IN UK
これはスティーブ・ジョブズが好んでた
https://www.thegamer.com/black-myth-wukongs-director-confirms-xbox-delay-series-s-memory/
Yocar goes on to state that the "10G shared memory" that is used by the Xbox Series S made releasing the game on the system impossible "without a few years of optimization experience". That pretty much rules out all the talk about back-handed PlayStation deals, and confirms what many already believed, being that the Series S is once again causing major headaches for a developer.
要約すると、
とのこと。
➤「救いようが最もうない、極東の自称他称の〝ジャーナリスト〟や〝学者〟、〝知米派〟は読まなくても構い。読んでもその肥大化した自己承認欲求、度し難い自己愛性人格では読むことはできないし、理解もできない。ただ見下した目線で見やるだけで、そこに自分が利用できる素材がなければ鼻で嗤うだけだ。この文章は、我がU.S.を領りたい、領ろうと下向きの反省的眼光で欲する諸君に読んで貰いたい。
I Traveled to 46 States in America This Summer. Here’s Why Trump Won.
By Frank S. Zhou
By Ezekiel A. Wells
Ezekiel A. Wells ’27 is a Double Concentrator in Environment Science & Engineering and Economics in Eliot House. He spent last summer traveling to 46 American states conducting interviews for his YouTube series, “Crossroads America.”
A week after Democrats’ election loss, accusations have flown in every direction within their Party. Some fault President Joe Biden for an egoistic refusal to drop out of the race earlier. Some blame the Harris campaign for failing to serve key demographics and communicate a clear vision for the country. And some blame Americans, claiming that racism and sexism drove voters toward Trump.
These factors certainly exist, but we’re missing a larger piece of the picture.
Over the summer, I traveled to 46 states in the U.S., creating a YouTube series highlighting slices of life across the country. In conversations from my nearly three-month road trip, I spoke with Republicans who were certain that inflation is entirely Biden’s fault and Democrats who, despite their frustrations with corporate profits and desires for universal healthcare, hoped for a more moderate candidate. From supporters of all candidates, I heard a shocking amount of misinformation.
After combing through hundreds of hours of interview footage from swing state Trump voters, I am certain that, as much as other factors influenced the outcome of the election, our crumbling media landscape — which has caused a rift in our democracy — is most to blame.
In the postwar period, news was dominated by three main channels, and because of the Fairness Doctrine, each station reported the same stories and covered multiple sides of each issue. Viewers picked which channels they watched mainly based on their preferences for news anchors’ personalities. Of course, this model had its problems, but, at the end of the day, it meant that Americans worked with a shared set of facts.
A shared set of facts is not the world we live in today.
Throughout my interviews, conspiracy theories were rampant, and on at least five separate occasions across separate states, I was told that Bill Gates tampers with our food, adding plastic to our fruits and vegetables to make his medical investments more profitable.
In conversations with voters, neither side seemed able to name many specific policy issues they cared about; everyone just seemed to repeat the words of their favorite pundits, podcast hosts, and internet personalities.
Although this behavior is harmful, I don’t blame everyday Americans. Blame falls on the media that has ostracized, disillusioned, and misinformed them.
Advertisement
I first saw this trend with low-wage workers in West Virginia, who — despite falling inflation rates — have seen stagnated salaries and clear increases in food costs. Channels like Fox News bred anger and resentment for many of them.
Take July of this summer, for example, when for the first time in his presidency, prices actually fell under the Biden administration. Traditional media establishments rushed to celebrate this victory, with one article from CNN declaring, “The White House can finally cross out ‘inflation’ on its list of presidential liabilities.” However, outside these bubbles, I observed many Americans held a different view.
In late July, I was welcomed at a massive family reunion in Tylertown, Mississippi, where one Trump voter — a middle-aged, Black, family man, pastor, and soul food enthusiast — made this clear.
“When I go in the grocery stores, and I gotta spend my last to get groceries, you mean to tell me I’m not gonna look and see who’s gonna vote to help me? I voted for Trump and I’d vote for him again, because he put money in our pocket,” he told me.
In their coverage, mainstream news organizations obsess over the Federal Reserve’s next rate cuts while failing to connect with people concerned with their next meals. With titles like “Vance: Young Americans ‘Are Becoming Paupers’ Due To Inflation, High Housing Costs,” sites like The Daily Wire had their fingers on the pulse of American sentiment, welcoming new readership from those who felt neglected by traditional media.
This problem was not just confined to the economy. While Biden’s mental state was deteriorating, liberal media outlets seemed to under-cover these stories, sheltering him from scrutiny of his declining capabilities, until the infamous presidential debate.
Formerly trusted networks slowly made themselves indigestible to the polarized American public, and in 2024, for the third year in a row, a Gallup poll found that more Americans indicated having “no trust” in the media than those who trust it a “great deal/fair amount”.
So where does the average American turn when the nation’s media cannot be trusted? For many people, it was YouTube talk shows, Newsmax, and podcasters such as Joe Rogan.
While Democrats seek to blame various internal factors for this election’s loss, I cannot help but think of Joe Rogan’s Trump endorsement, the many blind lies I heard from ordinary citizens across the country, and declining trust in American journalism.
As Harvard students and members of higher education institutions, we have a part to play in the problem. At Harvard’s Institute of Politics, those who denied the 2020 election results have been precluded from speaking at the JFK Jr. Forum. While the goal is understandable, it shields students from understanding the American viewpoints they represent.
Advertisement
There is a difference between platforming intentional and manipulative misinformation and listening to and learning about where people are and what they believe.
As a pipeline to mainstream media, Harvard, and its future journalists, have to consider the audience they lose when they stay inside of their bubble and ignore the issues of everyday Americans.
The disappearance of factual importance in our world is alarming and dangerous, but if we, as aspiring journalists, politicians, and engaged citizens, want to be taken seriously in communicating Trump’s threat to democracy, inflationary tariff policies, and so on, we owe American voters that seriousness, too.
Ezekiel A. Wells ’27 is a Double Concentrator in Environment Science & Engineering and Economics in Eliot House. He spent last summer traveling to 46 American states conducting interviews for his YouTube series, “Crossroads America."
The smell of paint and buzzing of bees. I was made to paint the fence as punishment. By me is Ben, the neighbor boy.
"Having fun?" he asks, mocking. I won't let him make fun of me!
"I could do this all day!" I replied. And guess what? Ben begged for the brush to try it, offering an apple in return. Other kids lined up, too. offering me their valuables. Now that's adventure!
The fence was painted, and adventure awaited! But then, I spotted an angel! In an instant, Amy left my heart, making room for this girl. Naturally, I flipped, jumped, and showed off, just win her admiration. At first, she paid me no mind, but then she threw a flower at me.
"It's a sign!" I thought to myself. I sat on the fence and waited until evening, hoping to see her again.
https://x.com/cspan/status/1825751860491276558
I made a lot of my mistake in my career, but I gave my best to you.
For 50 years...I give my heart and my soul to our nation.
I was too young to be in the Senate...and too old to stay as president.
I hope you know how grateful I am to all of you.
私はこれまでのキャリアで多くの過ちを犯しましたが、皆さんのために最善を尽くしました。
50年間、私は心と魂を国家に捧げてきました。
Once upon a time, in a land not so far from the bustling markets of modernity, there was a peculiar tale of a man named Kandata. This man, notorious for his misdeeds, found himself in a rather sticky situation, quite literally, in the depths of hell. Now, this isn't your everyday hell; this was a special one, where instead of fire and brimstone, there were pools of soy sauce and mountains of grated daikon radish.
One fine day, or as fine as it could be in such a place, Kandata noticed a glistening strand descending from the heavens. It was not the usual spider's silk but a strand of the finest Ibo-no-ito, the legendary noodles known for their delicate and refined texture. The gods, it seemed, had decided to give Kandata a chance at redemption, for even they could not resist the charm of these exquisite noodles.
Kandata, with hope in his heart and a growling stomach, began his ascent, climbing up the noodle. He climbed past the mountains of tempura, dodged the flying chopsticks, and even made a brief stop at the plateau of pickled ginger. As he climbed, he couldn't help but marvel at the noodle's resilience; it was, after all, the premium stuff, not your run-of-the-mill supermarket soba.
But alas, the tale takes a turn, as tales often do. For Kandata was not alone in his noodly escape.
Below him, a horde of other sinners had caught sight of the noodle and, driven by their own hunger, started to climb after him. Panic set in, for if there's one thing worse than being in noodle hell, it's having to share your noodle out of it.
In a fit of selfishness that would make even a kappa blush, Kandata bellowed, "This Ibo-no-ito is mine! Who told you lot you could climb it? Scram! Get off! This is a one-man noodle!" And just like that, the noodle snapped, not because of the weight, but because of the sheer audacity of trying to hoard something as communal as noodles.
Down went Kandata, back into the soy sauce pool, as the noodle retracted back into the heavens, leaving behind a scent of wheat and regret. The moral of the story? Never get between a man and his noodles, and more importantly, never underestimate the power of sharing... especially when it comes to Ibo-no-ito. For in the end, it's not just about the climb; it's about the company you share your noodles with.
And so, the legend of Kandata and the Ibo-no-ito lives on, a cautionary tale whispered across dinner tables, reminding us all that sometimes, the path to salvation is best traveled with a little bit of company and a lot of noodles.
広告撤回を求める運動もコロンブスやMrs. GREEN APPLE不買運動も起こっていないのにキャンセルカルチャーとは？
コロンブスが島を発見して、島の家にいた猿に西洋文明を教え人力車をひかせたりする動画は差別的でヤバいって言われただけでキャンセルカルチャーだーって何それ？
日本人が騒ぎさえしなければ海外では差別的だなんて思わなかった筈ってのは無理あるよ…。
悪意がなければ許されるなら、日本人はバーベンハイマーやキノコ雲頭に好意的コメントしたバービー公式アカウントをせめる事は出来ない。
日本人が私たちを猿として描くのは頭がおかしい（笑）。さて、ネイティブのバンドが長崎と広島の余波について話したいとしても...気にしないでください。私の民は決してそこまで落ち込むことはないだろう。 👎🏼
Nihonjin ga watashitachi o saru to shite kaku no wa atamagaokashī (Emi). Sate, neitibu no bando ga Nagasaki to Hiroshima no yoha ni tsuite hanashitai to shite mo... Kinishinaide kudasai. Watashi no min wa kesshite soko made ochikomu koto wanaidarou. 👎🏼
今話題のキム・カーダシアンとカニエ・ウェストの娘のノース・ウェスト。
全米最大規模のハリウッドホールで舞台「ライオンキング」でシンバ役としてデビューしたんだけどめちゃくちゃに叩かれてる。
理由は、キムとカニエがノースのことを主役にしたいがために多額の金を払ったのではないか？ということ。
私も今回の動画見たけど…
自信満々にのびのびと演技をしているのは子供らしくて可愛いんだけど、あのレベルでシンバ役はまじであり得ないと思ったし、これは金積まれたって言われても仕方ないだろっていうレベル。
オーディションを勝ち残った子供の保護者が告発の動画みたいなものを出してたり、実際にオーディションに提出したであろう演技をする動画見たけど、シンバにふさわしいくらいに上手い子たちばかりで悲しくなっちゃった。Nepobabyってもうセレブでは当たり前みたいになってるし、実力のあるself-madeが優先される世界線いつくるの😭
でもノースも可哀想なんだよな。
