  |
はてなキーワード: Matchとは
// ==UserScript==
// @namespace http://tampermonkey.net/
// @version 0.2
// @description 本文に「dorawii」または「megalodon」が含まれる投稿を非表示にする
// @match https://anond.hatelabo.jp/*
// @grant none
// ==/UserScript==
(function() {
'use strict';
const POST_SELECTOR = '.body .section';
const KEYWORDS = ['dorawii', 'megalodon'];
const posts = document.querySelectorAll(POST_SELECTOR);
posts.forEach(post => {
const textContent = post.textContent || post.innerText;
if (KEYWORDS.some(keyword => textContent.includes(keyword))) {
post.style.display = 'none';
}
});
})();
これはdorawiiもしくはmegalodonを含む投稿を非表示にするけど、
const KEYWORDS = ['dorawii', 'megalodon'];の部分を変えたり追加すれば好きな言葉に変えられるよ
dorawiiがタイトルに「dorawii」と入れなくなったので、本文にdorawiiがある投稿も非表示にする必要が出てきました。
ただAIに聞いたんだけど、CSSでは無理でJavaScriptならできると言われました。
そのJavaScriptを下に載せます。
// ==UserScript==
// @namespace http://tampermonkey.net/
// @version 0.1
// @description 本文に「dorawii」が含まれる投稿を非表示にする
// @match https://anond.hatelabo.jp/*
// @grant none
// ==/UserScript==
(function() {
'use strict';
// はてな匿名ダイアリーの一般的な投稿要素のクラスを仮定しています
const POST_SELECTOR = '.body .section'; // 例: .bodyクラスの子孫の.section要素
// すべての投稿要素を取得
const posts = document.querySelectorAll(POST_SELECTOR);
posts.forEach(post => {
// 投稿内の本文が含まれる要素（ここでは投稿全体を本文と見なす）のテキストを取得
const textContent = post.textContent || post.innerText;
if (textContent.includes(KEYWORD)) {
post.style.display = 'none';
}
});
})();
自分はiPhoneなので、Makeoverというアプリを入れて、JSの部分に上のを貼り付けてます。
gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/178921-dragon-ball-z-dokkan-battle/81050772
gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/178921-dragon-ball-z-dokkan-battle/81050774
gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/178921-dragon-ball-z-dokkan-battle/81050772?Match-Master
gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/178921-dragon-ball-z-dokkan-battle/81050774?Match-Master
ストZERO3の「尿を便座におしつけ～る」くらいにモヤモヤしてた
答え
tHis is gOnNa bE a MaTcH TO REmember!
ここmatchがどうして聞き取れなくて「This is gonna be a must to remember! 」（この戦いは記憶に残るマストなものになる！）かと思ってしまったｗ
なんか安心したわ
ramadan.mya.org.au/today-boost/posts/legit-ways-to-get-free-match-masters-free-gifts-boosters-coins-link-in-october-2025
ramadan.mya.org.au/today-boost/posts/daily-rewards-match-masters-free-gifts-boosters-coins-link-in-october-2025
ramadan.mya.org.au/today-boost/posts/rewards-match-masters-unveils-daily-free-gifts-boosters-and-coins-link-updated-in-october-2025
ramadan.mya.org.au/today-boost/posts/daily-rewards-cash-app-money-free-codes-everything-you-need-to-know-in-october-2025
ramadan.mya.org.au/today-boost/posts/daily-earning-cash-app-money-free-codes-rewards-ultimate-beginners-guide-in-october-2025
ramadan.mya.org.au/today-boost/posts/legit-ways-to-get-free-cash-app-money-earn-codes-daily-rewards-in-october-2025
ramadan.mya.org.au/rewards-today/posts/daily-rewards-match-masters-free-gifts-unlimited-coins-links-september-2025
ramadan.mya.org.au/rewards-today/posts/today-match-masters-free-gifts-boosters-and-coins-links-tips-tricks-2025
www.wortfm.org/calendar/updated-today-match-masters-unveils-free-gifts-boosters-and-coins-link-2025/
www.wortfm.org/calendar/today-match-masters-free-gifts-boosters-and-coins-links-tips-tricks-2025/
www.wortfm.org/calendar/daily-rewards-match-masters-free-gifts-boosters-coins-links-tips-tricks-2025/
というわけでお漏らし文学をChatGPTに調べてもらった
Last time I paid 1€ to take a piss,
I walked into the Sanifair, looked around,
and just… left.
It was so disgusting I decided to go outside and search for a bush instead.
— Reddit / r/AskAGerman
「1ユーロ払ってトイレに入ったんだけど、あまりに汚すぎてそのまま出てきた。結局、外の藪を探すことにした。」
ドイツ人ですら「お金払って藪で用を足す方がマシ」と言ってしまう悲哀。
URL：れでぃっと r/AskAGerman
I used to squat when using public toilets.
Then one day, I slipped.
That day, something inside me died… and something outside me was never clean again.
— れでぃっと / r/AskEurope
でもある日、足が滑った。
その日、僕の中の何かが死んだ… そして僕の外側も、二度と綺麗にはならなかった。」
もう「しゃがむ」という選択肢すら許されない。
In Belgium, there’s an unwritten rule.
You hand the bar owner a euro,
he silently hands you the bathroom key.
you find a dark corner of the street instead.
— Blog post “The art of le pee in Belgium”
バーの店主に1ユーロ渡すと、無言でトイレの鍵を渡してくれる。
観光都市ブリュッセルでも、路上で立ち尽くす影が絶えない理由。
URL：saintfacetious.com
All cafés were closed, all public toilets locked.
I stumbled along the riverbank,
In the end, the Seine saw everything.
— れでぃっと / r/Paris
「深夜1時、セーヌ川沿い。
ワインと後悔で酔った体を引きずりながら歩き、
パリの夜は美しく、そして容赦ない。
観光客だけでなく、現地の人すらこうなることがある。
I was in Bilbao, desperate to pee before the match.
I ran into one of those self-cleaning toilets…
and then the cleaning cycle started
僕は全身びしょ濡れになって出てきた。」
水と泡まみれで出てきたマンチェスター・ユナイテッドファン。
In Amsterdam, we had these half-open urinals called ‘pee curls.’
They were meant to stop men from peeing in the canals.
Now they’re disappearing…
and the canals smell like history again.
「アムステルダムには、半分だけ壁のある露天トイレ『pee curl』があった。
でも今はそのpee curlも減り、
I have MS.
Since the public toilets closed,
Last month, I didn’t make it home in time.
I cried, then laughed, then stayed inside for a week.
— The Guardian 読者投稿
「私は多発性硬化症です。
先月、家に帰る前に間に合わなくて…
URL：The Guardian
まあまあだな、また探す
＿＿＿＿
https://profile.hatena.ne.jp/dorawii_bukuma/
はてなのサイト側で読み込まれているはずのrksトークンを生成する関数を直接叩く方法がどうしても分からず結局request処理を自分で書く方法ではなく自動でUI側の保存ボタンをクリックするという無難な方向に落ち着いた。
最初から後者の方法をとっていればもっと全然早く作れたのにというは所詮言い訳か。
とにかくスクリプトを公開しておく。
@echo off
cd /d "C:\Users\user\Documents\jsscript"
:: Nodeサーバーを別ウィンドウで起動
start /min "" node run-batch-server.js
:: Pythonサーバーを別ウィンドウで起動（hatenaserver配下）
start cmd /k "" python hatenaserver\server.py
{
"username": "",
"password": ""
}from flask import Flask, request, jsonify
import json
import os
from hatena_client import HatenaClient
from flask_cors import CORS
app = Flask(__name__)
CORS(app)
config_path = os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), 'config.json')
with open(config_path, encoding='utf-8') as f:
config = json.load(f)
@app.route('/bookmark', methods=['POST'])
def handle_bookmark():
data = request.json
url = data.get("url")
if not url:
return jsonify({"error": "Missing URL"}), 400
client = HatenaClient(config["username"], config["password"])
client.start_browser()
if not client.login():
client.quit()
return jsonify({"error": "Login failed"}), 403
success = client.add_bookmark(url)
client.quit()
return jsonify({"status": "ok" if success else "fail"})
if __name__ == "__main__":
app.run(port=12347)
// ==UserScript==
// @name 自動セルクマ送信
// @namespace tampermonkey.net/
// @version 2025-08-07
// @description try to take over the world!
// @author You
// @match anond.hatelabo.jp/*
// @grant none
// ==/UserScript==
(function () {
'use strict';
const url = location.href;
if (!/^https:\/\/anond\.hatelabo\.jp\/\d+$/.test(url)) return;
const editLink = document.querySelector('a.edit');
if (!editLink) {
// 既に編集ページなので処理をスキップ
console.log('編集リンクが存在するため、スクリプトを終了します。');
return;
}
fetch('localhost:12347/bookmark', {
method: 'POST',
headers: {
'Content-Type': 'application/json'
},
body: JSON.stringify({ url: url })
}).then(r => console.log("通知成功")).catch(e => console.error("通知失敗", e));
})();
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20250821192753# -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQTEe8eLwpVRSViDKR5wMdsubs4+SAUCaKb0qwAKCRBwMdsubs4+ SHfiAQDcXmTHBaZ5Zzr1KI/OxZ0xl69oevOdy1FXJYwYvsmo5AD/ZPtZiO1JgTDj m+27iymlkdzIXOIGWfC82UTr1mJ7EwU= =YoV+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
木古 「きこ」ではなくて「きふる」って読むのね そしてTwitterアカウントのkipple… ギップルなら知ってるけど？と思って検索したら
アンドロイドは電気羊の夢を見るか？由来か～～
kipple
Popularized in Philip K. Dick's novel Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? (1968); originally the name of a SF fanzine, from the humorous interpretation of Kipling as a participle.[1]
kipple (uncountable)
(colloquial) useless items; junk; clutter
Synonym: crapola
2008 [1968], Philip K. Dick, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, Ballantine Books, →ISBN, page 65:
“Kipple is useless objects, like junk mail or match folders after you use the last match or gum wrappers or yesterday's homeopape. When nobody's around, kipple reproduces itself. For instance, if you go to bed leaving any kipple around appartment, when you wake up in the next morning there's twice as much of it. It always gets more and more.”
一度投稿したうえで別タブを開いてプログラム的(fetch)に送信してその別タブが閉じられる仕組み。
// ==UserScript==
// @name PGP未署名検出と別タブ自動編集
// @namespace http://tampermonkey.net/
// @version 1.0
// @description PGP署名がない投稿を自動編集ページへ誘導
// @match https://anond.hatelabo.jp/*
// @grant GM_setValue
// @grant GM_getValue
// @grant GM.openInTab
// ==/UserScript==
(function () {
'use strict';
const body = document.getElementById('entry-page');
if (!body) return;
const titleText = document.title;
if (!titleText.includes('dorawii')) return;
const pgpRegex = /BEGIN.*PGP(?: SIGNED MESSAGE| SIGNATURE)?/;
const preElements = document.querySelectorAll('div.body pre');
let hasPgpSignature = false;
for (const pre of preElements) {
if (pgpRegex.test(pre.textContent)) {
hasPgpSignature = true;
break;
}
}
if (hasPgpSignature) return;
const editLink = document.querySelector('a.edit');
const childTab = GM.openInTab(editLink.href, { active: false, insert: true, setParent: true });
})();
// ==UserScript==
// @name 編集ページ処理と自動送信・閉じ
// @namespace http://tampermonkey.net/
// @version 1.0
// @description 編集ページで署名処理と送信、タブ自動閉じ
// @match https://anond.hatelabo.jp/dorawii_31/edit?id=*
// @grant GM_getValue
// @grant GM_xmlhttpRequest
// @grant GM_setClipboard
// @grant GM_notification
// @connect localhost
// ==/UserScript==
(async function () {
'use strict';
const shouldRun = await GM_getValue('open-tab-for-edit', '0');
const textareaId = 'text-body';
const textarea = document.getElementById(textareaId);
if (!textarea) return;
const content = textarea.value;
const pgpSignatureRegex = /-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----[\s\S]+?-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----[\s\S]+?-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----/;
if (pgpSignatureRegex.test(content)) {
console.log('[PGPスクリプト] 署名が検出されたためそのまま送信します');
return;
}
const httpRequest = (url, data) => {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
GM_xmlhttpRequest({
method: 'POST',
url: url,
headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded' },
data: `value=${encodeURIComponent(data)}`,
onload: function (response) {
resolve(response.responseText);
},
onerror: function (error) {
reject(error);
}
});
});
};
// textarea の値を取得
// 1. 現在のページのURLからURLオブジェクトを作成
const currentUrl = new URL(window.location.href);
// 2. ベースとなる部分 (例: "https://anond.hatelabo.jp") を取得
const origin = currentUrl.origin;
// 3. 'id' パラメータの値 (例: "20250610184705") を取得
const idValue = currentUrl.searchParams.get('id');
// 4. ベース部分とIDを結合して、目的のURL文字列を生成
// idValueが取得できた場合のみ実行する
let newUrl = null;
if (idValue) {
newUrl = `${origin}/${idValue}`;
}
// 5. 生成されたURLを変数に代入し、コンソールに出力して確認
console.log(newUrl);
const valueToSend = newUrl;
try {
const signatureText = await httpRequest('http://localhost:12345/run-batch', valueToSend);
console.log('バッチ応答:', signatureText);
if (!signatureText.includes('BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE')) {
alert('PGP署名がクリップボードに見つかりませんでした。');
return;
}
const newText = content.replace(/\s*$/, '') + '\n' + signatureText + '\n';
textarea.value = newText;
console.log('[PGPスクリプト] 署名を貼り付けました。送信を再開します。');
const form = document.forms.edit;
const newForm = form.cloneNode(true);
form.replaceWith(newForm);
newForm.addEventListener('submit', async (e) => {
e.preventDefault(); // HTML標準のsubmitをキャンセル
const bodyText = textarea?.value || '';
// reCAPTCHA トークンの取得
const recaptchaToken = await new Promise((resolve) => {
grecaptcha.enterprise.ready(() => {
grecaptcha.enterprise.execute('hoge', { action: 'EDIT' })
.then(resolve);
});
});
// POSTするデータの構築
const formData = new FormData(newForm);
formData.set('body', bodyText);
formData.set('recaptcha_token', recaptchaToken);
formData.set('edit', '1');
try {
const response = await fetch(newForm.action, {
method: 'POST',
body: formData,
credentials: 'same-origin'
});
if (response.ok) {
console.log('送信成功');
window.close();
} else {
console.error('送信失敗', response.status);
}
} catch (err) {
console.error('送信中にエラーが発生', err);
}
});
// プログラム的に送信トリガー
newForm.dispatchEvent(new Event('submit', { bubbles: true }));
} catch (e) {
console.error('バッチ呼び出し失敗:', e);
}
})();
const http = require('http'); const { exec } = require('child_process'); const querystring = require('querystring'); const server = http.createServer((req, res) => { if (req.method === 'GET' && req.url === '/ping') { res.writeHead(200); res.end('pong'); } else if (req.method === 'POST' && req.url === '/run-batch') { let body = ''; req.on('data', chunk => { body += chunk.toString(); }); req.on('end', () => { const parsed = querystring.parse(body); const value = parsed.value || 'default'; // 値を引数としてバッチに渡す exec(`C:\\Users\\hoge\\Desktop\\makesign.bat "${value}"`, { encoding: 'utf8' }, (err, stdout, stderr) => { if (err) { res.writeHead(500); res.end('Error executing batch: ' + stderr); } else { res.writeHead(200, { 'Content-Type': 'text/plain; charset=utf-8' }); res.end(stdout.trim()); } }); }); } else { res.writeHead(404); res.end('Not found'); } }); server.listen(12345, () => { console.log('Batch server running at http://localhost:12345/'); });
@echo off setlocal enabledelayedexpansion :: 署名するファイル名 set "infile=%~1" set outfile=%TEMP%\pgp_output.asc :: 以前の出力があれば削除 if exist "%outfile%" del "%outfile%" :signloop :: AutoHotkeyでパスフレーズ入力（gpgがパスワード要求するダイアログが出た場合に備える） start "" /b "C:\Users\hoge\Documents\AutoHotkey\autopass.ahk" :: PGPクリア署名を作成 echo %infile% | gpg --yes --clearsign --output "%outfile%" :: 署名が成功していればループを抜ける if exist "%outfile%" ( goto postprocess ) else ( timeout /t 1 > nul goto signloop ) :postprocess powershell -nologo -command ^ "$header = '>|'; $footer = '|<'; $body = Get-Content '%outfile%' -Raw; Write-Output ($header + \"`r`n\" + $body + $footer)" powershell -nologo -command ^ "$header = '>|'; $footer = '|<'; $body = Get-Content 'signed.asc' -Raw; Set-Clipboard -Value ($header + \"`r`n\" + $body + $footer)" endlocal exit /b
#Persistent #SingleInstance ignore SetTitleMatchMode, 2 WinWaitActive, pinentry SendInput password Sleep 100 SendInput {Enter} ExitApp
動けばいいという考えで作っているので余分なコードも含んでいるかもしれない。
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20250613185036 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQTEe8eLwpVRSViDKR5wMdsubs4+SAUCaEv1FQAKCRBwMdsubs4+ SHHkAQDUOLgBcdji2T6MJ7h/vlMdFfGlWAzNdXijjE1gIuEPywEAiMNMZqhrMmtl c7UqRuggNJ/UTa5xTIcKp622+7jJQQg= =Lgkl -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
ようやく(ほぼ)すべてが自動化された。
あとはローカルサーバーの起動をスタートアップに設定する(方法をAIに聞いて指示に従う)だけの消化試合。
署名時要求してくるパスワードを自動入力するahkファイルはドキュメントのAutoHotkey配下に置いた。
バッチファイル(make.sign.bat)はデスクトップに置いた。
#Persistent #SingleInstance ignore SetTitleMatchMode, 2 WinWaitActive, pinentry SendInput お前のパスワード Sleep 100 SendInput {Enter} ExitApp
// run-batch-server.js const http = require('http'); const { exec } = require('child_process'); const server = http.createServer((req, res) => { if (req.url === '/ping') { res.writeHead(200); res.end('pong'); } else if (req.url === '/run-batch') { exec('C:\\Users\\you\\Desktop\\makesign.bat', (err) => { res.writeHead(200); res.end(err ? 'Error' : 'OK'); }) ; } else { res.writeHead(404); res.end('Not found'); } }); server.listen(12345, () => { console.log('Batch server running at http://localhost:12345/'); });
@echo off setlocal enabledelayedexpansion :: ミリ秒単位のUTC時刻を取得 for /f %%a in ('powershell -nologo -command "[int64]::Parse((Get-Date).ToUniversalTime().ToString('yyyyMMddHHmmssfff'))"') do set timestamp=%%a :: 署名するファイル名 set infile=%TEMP%\pgp_input.txt set outfile=%TEMP%\pgp_output.asc :: 以前の出力があれば削除 if exist "%outfile%" del "%outfile%" :: タイムスタンプを原文として保存 echo %timestamp% > "%infile%" :signloop :: AutoHotkeyでパスフレーズ入力（gpgがパスワード要求するダイアログが出た場合に備える） start "" /b "C:\Users\infini\Documents\AutoHotkey\autopass.ahk" :: PGPクリア署名を作成 gpg --yes --clearsign --output "%outfile%" "%infile%" :: 署名が成功していればループを抜ける if exist "%outfile%" ( echo [INFO] 署名成功 goto postprocess ) else ( echo [WARN] 署名失敗、再試行します… timeout /t 1 > nul goto signloop ) :postprocess :: PowerShellで余計な改行なしに |< をつけてクリップボードにコピー powershell -nologo -command ^ "$header = '>|'; $footer = '|<'; $body = Get-Content '%outfile%' -Raw; Set-Clipboard -Value ($header + \"`r`n\" + $body + $footer)" echo Done. signed.asc created and clipboard updated (no extra blank line). endlocal exit /b
// ==UserScript== // @name PGP署名自動付加スクリプト（GM_xmlhttpRequest版） // @namespace http://tampermonkey.net/ // @version 1.0 // @description 投稿前にPGP署名を付けてから送信（fetch未使用） // @match https://anond.hatelabo.jp/dorawii_31/edit* // @grant GM_xmlhttpRequest // @grant GM_setClipboard // @grant GM_notification // / @connect localhost // ==/UserScript== (function () { 'use strict'; const submitId = 'submit-button'; const textareaId = 'text-body'; const localServer = 'http://localhost:12345/run-batch'; const pgpSignatureRegex = /-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----[\s\S]+?-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----[\s\S]+?-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----/; const httpRequest = (url) => { return new Promise((resolve, reject) => { GM_xmlhttpRequest({ method: 'GET', url: url, onload: function (response) { resolve(response.responseText); }, onerror: function (error) { reject(error); } }); }); }; const interceptClick = () => { const btn = document.getElementById(submitId); if (!btn || btn.dataset.pgpIntercepted === 'true') return; btn.dataset.pgpIntercepted = 'true'; btn.addEventListener('click', async function (e) { const textarea = document.getElementById(textareaId); if (!textarea) return; const content = textarea.value; if (pgpSignatureRegex.test(content)) { console.log('[PGPスクリプト] 署名が検出されたためそのまま送信します'); return; } e.preventDefault(); e.stopImmediatePropagation(); console.log('[PGPスクリプト] 署名が見つからないため処理を停止し、署名を取得します'); try { await httpRequest(localServer); // バッチ実行 const signatureText = await navigator.clipboard.readText(); if (!signatureText.includes('BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE')) { alert('PGP署名がクリップボードに見つかりませんでした。'); return; } const newText = content.replace(/\s*$/, '') + '\n' + signatureText + '\n'; textarea.value = newText; console.log('[PGPスクリプト] 署名を貼り付けました。送信を再開します。'); btn.click(); // イベント再発火 } catch (err) { alert('PGP署名の取得または貼り付けに失敗しました。\n' + err); } }, true); }; window.addEventListener('load', () => { setTimeout(interceptClick, 1000); }); })();
プロミスメソッドとか全然まだ理解してなくてそのなかに関数代入したその関数にオブジェクトのプロパティにresponseを?いやまあそのあたりのコードが示すデータの流れが全然理解できないような人間でもここまでできちゃった。
AIすごいなと思うよ。そして思うのは今後重要になってくるのは文法とか自体に詳しいことじゃなくて、そのプログラムの処理内容を指示できるシステムエンジニア的な言語化能力のほうじゃないかなと思った。
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 20250609111559680 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQTEe8eLwpVRSViDKR5wMdsubs4+SAUCaEbCbwAKCRBwMdsubs4+ SLueAPwOv7PBk4voAe5qlcCEvs/PJhmKc5QAb/1R43JMQFuDZgD/UTPEKsL/PhK9 jFGv2HDXK1dVjLNwvosgX9uYJh5xxwY= =qiOE -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
「Utopia」の初出。トマス・モアの『Utopia』（1516年）。
「Dustopia」の初出。ルイス・ヘンリー・ヤングの『Utopia: or, Apollo's golden days』（1747年）。
But Heav'n, of late, was all distraction, and, more than ever, rent in faction; Caus'd only by a wretched isle, On which we thought no God would smile:
だが近ごろの天界は混乱の極みにあり、かつてにも増して内紛に引き裂かれていた。それもこれも、ひとつの惨めな島のせいだった。誰の目にも、神が微笑むことなどないと思われていたその島。
Not stor'd with wealth, nor blest in air: no useful Plants could ripen there; Mismanag'd by th' unskillful hinds, or nipt by chilling Eastern winds:
富を蓄えず、空気にも恵まれず、作物は育たずに終わる。未熟な農夫たちにより荒らされ、あるいは東から吹きつける冷たい風に凍えて枯れる。
Or if they flourish'd for a Day, They soon became some Insect's prey: For many such infest the soil, Devouring th' honest lab'rers's toil ; *So venomous, that some had rather have, in their stead, the toad, or adder.
たとえ一日だけ花開いたとしても、すぐに虫の餌食となった。というのも、多くの害虫が土地にはびこり、誠実な労働者の努力を食い尽くしていたのだ。そのあまりの毒性に、むしろヒキガエルやマムシの方がましだと言う者もいるほどだった。
Unhappy isle!
不幸な島よ！
scarce known to Fame; DUSTOPIA was its slighted name.
名声を得ることもなく、「デュストピア」と呼ばれて軽んじられていた。
「Cacotopia」の初出。ジェレミー・ベンサムの『Plan of parliamentary reform』（1817年）。
A constitution, with this poison--slow, but not the less sure—in the bowels of it!—Rotten, even from the time that this poison was injected into it, must have been the matchless constitution,—rotten at the core—and, of such rottenness, what we are now suffering is among the fruits.
この毒を――遅効性ではあるが、それでも確実な毒を――その内臓に抱えた憲法！ この毒が注入されたその時からすでに、あの比類なき憲法は腐敗していたに違いない――中核から腐っていた――そして、いま我々がこうして被っている苦しみこそが、その腐敗の産物の一つなのだ。
As a match for Utopia, suppose a Cacotopia discovered and described,—would not filth in this shape be a "fundamental feature" in it?
ユートピアに対抗するものとして、「カコトピア」が発見され、描写されたと仮定しよう――このような汚濁が、その「根本的な特徴」として描かれないだろうか？
https://archive.org/details/planparliamenta00bentgoog/page/n204/mode/2up
ベンサムは、議員たちが国王から官職を与えられることを批判している。小さな賄賂などは不道徳とされて取り締まっているが、国王から官職が与えられることはむしろ名誉として扱われる。実質的にはそれは癒着であり腐敗でしかないのに。という話をしている。
「Dystopia」の初出。ジョン・スチュワート・ミルの議会演説（1868年）。
Now, on this subject the Government have not shown themselves altogether inflexible. The noble Lord the Chief Secretary for Ireland has expressed his willingness in some degree to entertain the principle of religious equality, and 1517 I thank him for it; but, as has been remarked by my hon. Friend the Member for Manchester (Mr. Jacob Bright), he proposed to do it—if at all—by levelling up instead of levelling down. The noble Lord is willing that every valley shall be exalted; but he does not go on to the succeeding clause, and say that every mountain and hill shall be laid low.
さて、この問題に関して、政府は完全に強硬というわけではないようです。アイルランド担当大臣である閣下は、宗教的平等という原則をある程度受け入れる用意があると述べました。これは感謝すべきことですが、マンチェスター選出の敬愛する友人（ジェイコブ・ブライト氏）が指摘したように、彼はこれを「下げる」のではなく「引き上げる」ことで実現しようとしているようです。すなわち、彼は「すべての谷を高くする」ことには賛成ですが、「すべての山と丘を低くする」とまでは言っていないのです。
So long as the national property which is administered by the Episcopal Church of Ireland is not diverted from its present purpose, the noble Lord has no objection at all to this country saddling itself with the endowment of another great hierarchy, which, if effected on the principle of religious equality, would be a great deal more costly than even that which now exists. Does the noble Lord really think it possible that the people of England will submit to this?
アイルランド国教会が管理する国家資産が現在の用途から変更されない限り、閣下はこの国が別の大きな教会制度への助成金という負担を背負うことにはまったく反対ではないのです。そしてもしそれが宗教的平等という原則に基づくのであれば、現在の制度よりはるかに高くつくことでしょう。閣下は本当に、イングランド国民がそれに甘んじると考えておられるのでしょうか？
I may be permitted, as one who, in common with many of my betters, have been subjected to the charge of being Utopian, to congratulate the Government on having joined that goodly company. It is, perhaps, too complimentary to call them Utopians, they ought rather to be called dystopians, or cacotopians. What is commonly called Utopian is something too good to be practicable; but what they appear to favour is too bad to be practicable.
私は、自分自身をユートピア主義者だと非難されてきた多くの優れた方々とともに、政府がその立派な仲間入りをしたことをお祝い申し上げたいと思います。ただ、彼らを「ユートピア主義者」と呼ぶのは、少々褒めすぎかもしれません。「ディストピア主義者」あるいは「カコトピア主義者」とでも呼ぶべきでしょう。通常「ユートピア的」とは、良すぎて実現不可能なものを指しますが、彼らの支持するものは、悪すぎて実現不可能なもののようです。
https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1868/mar/12/adjourned-debate
イングランドはカトリックから離脱して「イングランド国教会」を組織したが、同様にアイルランドでも従来のカトリック教会を「アイルランド国教会」のもとに置いた。しかしアイルランド人の多くは改宗せず、アイルランド国教徒は全体の1/8にすぎなかった。それでもアイルランド国教会は「国教」であるので、アイルランドのすべての教会の財産を保有しており、またアイルランド国教会への助成金は全アイルランド人に課せられる税金から支払われていた。この不平等の是正にあたって、政府は「アイルランド国教会の待遇を下げる」のではなく「他の教会の待遇を上げる」ことで解決しようとしているという。つまり他の教会にも同様の助成金を支払おうとしており、それはもちろんイングランド国民の税金から賄われることになる。そんなことをイングランド国民が許すと思っているのか？とミルは言っている。その後、1871年にアイルランド国教廃止法が施行された。
VitaにCFWを導入するにあたり、情報が散乱していたのでまとめる
・2022年末に革新的進歩があり、VITA単体でCFW導入できるようになった（通称 HENlo）
・にも関わらず古いCFW導入方法を案内しているブログが大量にある
・しかもタイトルの"20XX年最新"だけ更新し続けているから、最新記事に見える
↓
PC使用が前提になっているブログは全部古いので無視した方が良いです。
・『HENlo』について触れている
この2つが押さえられてれば最新情報です。（2025年5月現在）
ただし、現状だと実は『PC操作が一部必要』という罠があります。
その問題について書いている記事が見当たらないので、ここに残しておきます。
超具体的には
「HENkaku、VitaDeploy、VitaShellは導入できた」
「けどEnso導入ができない/つまづいている」 エラー：failed to get fw version please disable all the plugins and try again
5chでもRedditでも
『プラグインを無効にしろ』『0syscall6を無効にしろ』って書いてあったのですが、実はEnsoのバージョン変えれば解決します。（後述）
この記事が役に立ちました
[Vita] 2023年最新手順【HENlo】3.65-3.74 PC不要でCFW(HENkaku)導入
https://re-doing.com/vita-henlo-hack/
（一応魚拓：https://web.archive.org/web/20250226111105/https://re-doing.com/vita-henlo-hack/）
・HENkaku （カスタムファームウェア 3.65 変革 -2）
・VitaDeploy
・VitaShell
・最悪文鎮化する可能性があるのでセーブデータバックアップを取ったほうが良い
・VITAのセーブデータは特殊で、PCと繋ぐだけでは取り出せない
・バックアップにはいくつか方法があるが、PCのコンテンツ管理アシスタントは既に使えないと思ったほうが良い。PS Plusのクラウドバックアップが最も良いはず
・記事の内容を実施する前にバックアップ取るのを強くおすすめする
これをインストールすることで、電源を切ってからもCFW状態を維持できます。
VitaDeploy内のApp downloaderメニューからEnsoをインストールできますが、実はこのバージョンが古いです。※重要※
そのためVitaDeployからインストールすると先程のエラー（failed to get fw version please disable all the plugins and try again）が必ず出ます。
「PC不要になった」と書いてあったので盲点ですが、ここからPC必要です。
正しい方法は以下です
1, PC操作：GithubからEnso最新版のenso.vpkファイルをダウンロード（現在v1.1）
https://github.com/TheOfficialFloW/enso/releases
2, PCとVitaをUSBケーブルで繋げる ※データ転送対応ケーブルを使うこと。相性もある
5, PC操作：USBドライブとしてVITAのデータが表示されるので、ダウンロードしていたenso.vpkファイルを置く（フォルダはどこでもOK。自分はルート直下に置きました）
7, Vita操作：VitaShellでenso.vpkを見つける（さっきルートに置いたなら恐らくux0:にある）
9. Vita操作：Do you want to install this package? → ◯ボタン
10. Vita操作：~~~ Would you like to continue the install? ※意訳：「失敗したら文鎮化するけど自己責任だけど続ける？」 → ◯ボタン
11. 進行バーが消えたらインストール完了 ホーム画面に戻ってOK
Ensoはファームウェアが3.60か3.65じゃないとインストールできないです。（3.65 変革 -2は3.65扱い）
先程の記事の通り進めていたら3.65 変革 -2 になっているはずですが、実行前に再確認して下さい。
1, ~~~ Press CIRCLE to accept these terms or any other key to not accept. → ◯ボタンを押す（=CIRCLE ）
2, Options：
CROSS Install /reinstall the hack.
SQUARE Fix boot configuration (choose this if taiHEN isn't loading on boot).
CIRCLE Exit without doing anything.
Locking sustem ..
（中略）
The installation was completed successfully.
suocess.
MBR was detected but instllation checksum dose not match.
A dump was created at ux0:data/blocks.bin.
Press X to continue, any othe key to exit.
意訳：「ちょい待った。思ってた構成じゃないから危ないかもしれんわ。続ける？」
→✕ボタンを押す ※結局原因分かってないので自己責任でお願いします※
4, Locking sustem ..
（中略）
The installation was completed successfully.
suocess.
Enso導入が成功していると
・ファームウェアが3.65 変革 -2のままなっている
お疲れ様でした。
記事の本題は以上です。
VITAのセーブデータは暗号化されており、吸い出せてもエミュレータで使えないらしい。本体機体とセットで揃わないと使えない仕様。
調べたらセーブデータをここまでキツく縛ってるハードは他にない
だからメモリーカードのデータ管理でもPSPのセーブデータしか項目がなかったのか…
不便すぎる
当時の仮説
・HENkaku設定が悪さをしているのではないか（PSNの偽装を有効化、バージョンの偽装を有効化） →オフにしたが関係なかった
・本体にSD2VITAを刺しているのが良くないのではないか →抜いたが関係なかった
・enso.vpkの置き場所がルート（ux0:）が良くなかったのではないか →関係なかった
・VITAにメモリーカードを刺しているのが良くないのではないか →関係なかったが、データ保護的には抜くのが良さそう
・ゴミデータが残っていて悪さしているのではないか（手順を間違えたデータや古いデータなど） →関係ある可能性はある。最後までわからず
・Ensoのバージョンが古いのではないか →これが主要因だった
ゴミデータを疑った自分は正規のファームウェアに戻して、CFW化をやり直したりもした。
その際HENkakuすら入れられなくなってしまったので、抜け方を書いておく。
ENSO実行
↓
~~~ Press CIRCLE to accept these terms or any other key to not accept. → ◯ボタンを押す（=CIRCLE ）
↓
Options：
CROSS Install /reinstall the hack.
SQUARE Fix boot configuration (choose this if taiHEN isn't loading on boot).
CIRCLE Exit without doing anything.
→ △ボタンを押す（=TRIANGLE Uninstall the hack.）
↓
↓
↓
ファームウェアアップデートが促され、アップデートしないとメモリースティックが使えない
↓
↓
↓
HENloメニュー
・Exit
↓
「Eiting in 3」 の後に、以下のエラーメッセージがでて固まってしまう
vita starting taihen framework
If you are stuck on this screen, hold down the power button until your Vita turns off, then turn it back on.
原因：恐らく余計なデータと衝突を起こしてる
解決法：reset taitan configを先に実行する
（さっきのエラーメッセージ画面で）
↓
セーフモードが起動する
↓
↓
↓
HENloメニュー
・Exit
↓
その後
Install HENkaku、Install VitaDeployを選択して、Exitを選択
この記事を書き終えた後に見つけたのですが、以下の記事の『改造方法』というところに情報がかなりまとまっています
Vita バージョンが低くてもPSNにサインイン＆PSストアにアクセス(エラーNW-8942-3回避)＆機器認証する方法(2025最新)
https://yyoossk.blogspot.com/2024/10/vitapsnps2024.html
今回VITAのセーブデータバックアップが主目的だったから、徒労でしかなかった
指摘、補足、最新情報あれば反応もらえるとありがたいです
デモにアーカイブからの復元を追加して、「情動のカケラ」がどう再処理されるか示すで。
```
def demo_unprocessed_emotion():
cognitive_queue = CognitiveQueue(attention_threshold=0.4)
print("=== 未処理感情システムのデモ（Monday対応版） ===\n")
for emotion in cognitive_queue.unprocessed_emotions[:]:
emotion.salience = 0.05
cognitive_queue.update_queue()
print(f"アーカイブされた感情数: {len(cognitive_queue.archived_emotions)}")
retrieved_emotion = cognitive_queue.retrieve_from_archive(pattern_name="visual_discrepancy")
if retrieved_emotion:
print(f"復元された感情: {retrieved_emotion}")
cognitive_queue.partially_process(retrieved_emotion, "あの時の違和感", 0.7, context="recalled_anomaly")
print(f"再処理後の状態: {retrieved_emotion}")
print(f"最良の言語マッチ: {retrieved_emotion.get_best_language_match()}")
else:
print("\n9. モダリティによる感情検索（インデックス使用）")
matches = cognitive_queue.lookup_by_modality("auditory")
print(f"検索結果数: {len(matches)}")
for emotion in cognitive_queue.unprocessed_emotions:
emotion.apply_decay(3.0)
cognitive_queue.update_queue()
status = cognitive_queue.get_status_summary()
print(f"時間経過後の未処理感情の総数: {status['total_unprocessed']}")
print(f"時間経過後の平均顕在性: {status['average_salience']:.2f}")
```
def demo_unprocessed_emotion():
"""未処理感情システムのデモ。改善点（記憶再編集、言語学習、反応速度など）を活用"""
cognitive_queue = CognitiveQueue(attention_threshold=0.4)
print("=== 未処理感情システムのデモ（改善版） ===\n")
visual_signals = [
SensorySignal("visual", 0.7, -0.3),
SensorySignal("somatic", 0.4, -0.2)
]
visual_discomfort = cognitive_queue.register_new_emotion(visual_signals, 0.65)
print(f"生成された感情: {visual_discomfort}")
print(f"支配的モダリティ: {visual_discomfort.get_dominant_modality()}")
print(f"平均感情価: {visual_discomfort.get_average_valence():.2f}")
print(f"信号の反応速度: {[s.latency for s in visual_signals]}")
visual_discomfort.add_pattern_match("visual_discrepancy", 0.75)
try:
visual_discomfort.add_memory_path("/memory/recent/room_layout")
except ValueError as e:
accessed_emotion = cognitive_queue.access_emotion(visual_discomfort)
print(f"新しい感情インスタンス: {accessed_emotion}")
print(f"構造化レベル（再編集後）: {accessed_emotion.structure_level:.2f}")
# 3. 内受容感覚
intero_signals = [
SensorySignal("interoceptive", 0.6, -0.7),
SensorySignal("somatic", 0.5, -0.4)
]
intero_discomfort = cognitive_queue.register_new_emotion(intero_signals, 0.55)
print(f"生成された感情: {intero_discomfort}")
intero_discomfort.add_language_candidate("違和感", 0.4)
cognitive_queue.partially_process(intero_discomfort, "気分が悪い", 0.6, context="negative_mood")
print(f"学習済み言語: {cognitive_queue.learned_terms}")
audio_signals = [
SensorySignal("auditory", 0.8, 0.6),
SensorySignal("emotional", 0.7, 0.5)
]
audio_memory = cognitive_queue.register_new_emotion(audio_signals, 0.7)
print(f"生成された感情: {audio_memory}")
audio_memory.add_language_candidate("聞き覚えのあるメロディ", 0.75)
audio_memory.add_pattern_match("musical_fragment", 0.85)
audio_memory.add_memory_path("/memory/music/recent")
cognitive_queue.update_queue()
status = cognitive_queue.get_status_summary()
print(f"未処理感情の総数: {status['total_unprocessed']}")
print(f"処理キューのサイズ: {status['processing_queue_size']}")
print(f"モダリティ分布: {status['modality_distribution']}")
print(f"感情価分布: {status['valence_distribution']}")
print(f"学習済み言語数: {status['learned_terms_count']}")
# 6. 処理対象の取得
next_emotion = cognitive_queue.get_next_for_processing()
print(f"処理対象: {next_emotion}")
if next_emotion:
cognitive_queue.partially_process(next_emotion, "視覚的な違和感を感じている", 0.85, context="visual_anomaly")
print(f"処理後の状態: {next_emotion}")
print(f"構造化レベル: {next_emotion.structure_level:.2f}")
print(f"最良の言語マッチ: {next_emotion.get_best_language_match()}")
print("\n8. モダリティによる感情検索（インデックス使用）")
matches = cognitive_queue.lookup_by_modality("auditory")
print(f"検索結果数: {len(matches)}")
for emotion in cognitive_queue.unprocessed_emotions:
emotion.apply_decay(3.0)
cognitive_queue.update_queue()
status = cognitive_queue.get_status_summary()
print(f"時間経過後の未処理感情の総数: {status['total_unprocessed']}")
print(f"時間経過後の平均顕在性: {status['average_salience']:.2f}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
demo_unprocessed_emotion()
id を手動でコピーしてくるのが面倒だったから、削除ボタンが画面に出るようにした
押すと即削除
const rkm = "(トークン的なもの)" const user = "(ユーザ名)" const delmasda = (id) => fetch(`https://anond.hatelabo.jp/${user}/edit`, { "headers": { "content-type": "application/x-www-form-urlencoded", }, "referrer": "https://anond.hatelabo.jp/", "referrerPolicy": "origin", "body": new URLSearchParams({ "rkm": rkm, "mode": "confirm", "id": id, "delete": "削除する" }).toString(), "method": "POST", }) for (const sec of document.querySelectorAll(".section")) { const id = sec.querySelector("a").href.match(/92;/(92;d{14})/)[1] const delbtn = document.createElement("button") delbtn.textContent = "削除" delbtn.onclick = async () => { await delmasda(id) sec.remove() } sec.querySelector(".edit").after(delbtn) }
増田で 3 分以上投稿されない期間があるのか気になったから調べた
直近の 1 日だとこれだけあった
2025-03-22 00:14 -- 2025-03-22 00:18 2025-03-22 00:10 -- 2025-03-22 00:14 2025-03-21 07:56 -- 2025-03-21 08:00 2025-03-21 07:50 -- 2025-03-21 07:56 2025-03-21 07:44 -- 2025-03-21 07:48 2025-03-21 07:28 -- 2025-03-21 07:32 2025-03-21 06:58 -- 2025-03-21 07:03 2025-03-21 06:45 -- 2025-03-21 06:54 2025-03-21 06:32 -- 2025-03-21 06:37 2025-03-21 05:56 -- 2025-03-21 06:04 2025-03-21 05:51 -- 2025-03-21 05:56 2025-03-21 05:34 -- 2025-03-21 05:38 2025-03-21 05:30 -- 2025-03-21 05:34 2025-03-21 05:00 -- 2025-03-21 05:09 2025-03-21 04:56 -- 2025-03-21 05:00 2025-03-21 04:45 -- 2025-03-21 04:50 2025-03-21 04:09 -- 2025-03-21 04:13 2025-03-21 03:41 -- 2025-03-21 03:45 2025-03-21 03:29 -- 2025-03-21 03:39 2025-03-21 03:03 -- 2025-03-21 03:07 2025-03-21 02:56 -- 2025-03-21 03:02 2025-03-21 02:44 -- 2025-03-21 02:48 2025-03-21 02:33 -- 2025-03-21 02:37 2025-03-21 02:21 -- 2025-03-21 02:27 2025-03-21 02:14 -- 2025-03-21 02:19
秒はみてないから 00:01:01 - 00:03:59 はほぼ 3 分だけど 2 分扱いだし、 00:01:59 - 00:04:00 はほぼ 2 分だけど 3 分扱いになるくらいの誤差はある
日によって違うだろうし、曜日の影響も大きそうだから 1 ヶ月分くらい調査しようかと思ったけど、
増田の量が思いの外多すぎて 1 日分だけでも 100 ページ以上取得しないといけなかった
件数だと 2500 以上
一応取得に使ったコードも載せとく
import { setTimeout } from "node:timers/promises" import { Browser } from "happy-dom" const getTimestamps = async function* () { const browser = new Browser() const page = browser.newPage() try { for (let num = 1; ; num++) { await setTimeout(3000) await page.goto(`https://anond.hatelabo.jp/?page=${num}`) const days = page.mainFrame.document.querySelectorAll(".day") for (const day of days) { const date = day.querySelector("h2 .date").textContent.trim() for (const footer of day.querySelectorAll(".sectionfooter")) { const time = footer.textContent.match(/\d{2}:\d{2}/)[0] yield `${date} ${time}` } } } } finally { await page.close() await browser.close() } } const diff = (a, b) => { return new Date(b + ":00") - new Date(a + ":00") } let prev = null for await (const datetime of getTimestamps()) { if (prev &amp;&amp; diff(datetime, prev) > 1000 * 60 * 3) { console.log(datetime, prev) } prev = datetime }
基本は空いても 5 分程度であり、最大でも 10 分となっている
Let’s face it: starting a conversation on a dating app can feel terrifying. You see someone you’re interested in, you type out a message, and then… you delete it. “Is this too boring?” “Will they even respond?” “What if I sound awkward?”
We’ve all been there. That first message can make or break your chances of connecting with someone amazing. But here’s the good news: you don’t have to overthink it. With the right opening line, you can spark a conversation that feels natural, fun, and meaningful.
At MixerDates, we believe that every great connection starts with a great conversation. That’s why we’ve put together this guide to help you craft the best dating app opening lines—ones that stand out, show your personality, and lead to real connections. Ready to ditch the “hey” and start making an impact? Let’s dive in!
[:contents]
Before we get into the best opening lines, let’s talk about why your first message is so important.
Your opening line is your chance to make a great first impression. It’s the gateway to a conversation that could lead to something special. A thoughtful, creative message shows that you’re genuinely interested—not just swiping mindlessly.
Your first message sets the tone for the entire conversation. A boring or generic opener might lead to a dull chat, while a fun or intriguing one can spark excitement and curiosity.
Let’s be real: everyone loves feeling special. When you put effort into your opening line, it shows that you care enough to stand out. And on MixerDates, where we value authenticity and positivity, that effort goes a long way.
Now, let’s get to the good stuff—the best dating app opening lines that actually work. These are divided into categories to suit different personalities and situations.
While the examples above are great starting points, the best opening lines are the ones that feel authentic to you. Here are some tips to help you craft your own:
Reference something from their profile—a photo, a hobby, or a shared interest. It shows you’re paying attention and not just copying and pasting.
Avoid heavy or overly serious topics right off the bat. Keep the tone light and playful to make the conversation enjoyable.
Don’t try to be someone you’re not. If you’re naturally funny, lean into that. If you’re more thoughtful, go for a sincere compliment or question.
“Hey” or “What’s up?” might be easy, but they’re also forgettable. Put in a little effort to stand out.
This gives the other person an easy way to respond and keeps the conversation flowing.
At MixerDates, we’re all about creating a positive, inclusive space where you can feel comfortable being yourself. Here’s why our platform is the best place to put these opening lines into practice:
We welcome everyone, no matter who you are or who you love. Our platform is designed to be a safe space where you can connect with like-minded people.
Our users create detailed profiles that make it easy to find shared interests and craft personalized opening lines.
We encourage our community to be genuine and kind, so you can feel confident starting conversations without fear of judgment or rejection.
Don’t just take our word for it—here’s what one of our users had to say:
“I met my partner on MixerDates, and it all started with a simple message about our shared love for travel. The conversation flowed naturally, and the rest is history. I’m so grateful for this platform!”
While a great opening line can spark a conversation, building a real connection takes more than just a clever message. Here are the key elements to look for when seeking a meaningful connection:
A strong connection starts with alignment on the things that matter most. Do you share similar values, life goals, or visions for the future?
Look for someone who is willing to share their thoughts, feelings, and vulnerabilities—and who encourages you to do the same.
Healthy relationships are a two-way street. Both people should be putting in effort to communicate, plan dates, and support each other.
A true connection allows both people to be themselves without judgment. Look for someone who celebrates your uniqueness and encourages you to pursue your passions.
Communication is the foundation of any strong relationship. A mutual connection thrives on honesty, transparency, and the ability to resolve conflicts in a healthy way.
At MixerDates, we’re here to help you find these key elements in a partner. Our platform is designed to connect you with people who share your values and are looking for the same things you are. Starting a conversation on a dating app doesn’t have to be stressful. With the right opening line, you can spark a connection that feels natural, fun, and meaningful. And at MixerDates, we’re here to help you every step of the way.
So, what are you waiting for? Craft that perfect opening line, join MixerDates, and start connecting with people who value authenticity and positivity. Your perfect match is out there—and they’re just one message away.
First dates can be exciting and nerve-wracking all at once. You’re meeting someone new, learning about their interests, and trying to figure out if there’s chemistry between you. And then there’s flirting, that delicate dance of showing someone you’re interested without being too forward or awkward.
Flirting doesn’t have to be a high-pressure situation. In fact, it can be the most fun part of getting to know someone. Whether you're meeting someone on MixerDates or any other platform, the most important thing is to be genuine, stay calm, and let the connection develop naturally.
If you’ve ever found yourself wondering how to flirt on a first date without feeling uncomfortable, you’re not alone. Everyone has their awkward moments, but the more you understand the art of flirting, the easier it becomes. In this article, we’ll break down how to flirt in a way that feels natural, exciting, and authentic to who you are. So, let's dive in and learn how to make the most of your first date experience—without overthinking it.
When it comes to flirting, confidence is key. But what does it really mean to be confident on a first date? Confidence doesn’t mean you need to be perfect, or even outgoing—it simply means being comfortable in your own skin and showing up as your authentic self.
Have you ever noticed how people are drawn to those who radiate self-assurance? It’s not about bragging or dominating the conversation—it’s about presenting yourself with ease. If you feel good about yourself, it will naturally show. A great smile, good posture, and eye contact can go a long way in making a good first impression.
For instance, think about the last time someone walked into a room and immediately caught your attention—not because they were the most attractive person in the room, but because of their energy. They were confident, they were present, and they made you feel at ease. That’s the kind of confidence you want to project on your date.
When you're confident, you're not worried about saying the perfect thing. Instead, you focus on enjoying the moment, making the other person feel comfortable, and letting the connection happen naturally. That’s the magic of confidence—it allows you to be present, fun, and, most importantly, yourself.
Let’s face it—no one wants to feel like they’re being “worked” or put through a game. That’s why subtlety is such a powerful tool when it comes to flirting. It's all about showing interest without being over-the-top or too obvious.
Flirting doesn’t always mean complimenting someone non-stop or using cheesy pickup lines. In fact, the most successful flirting is the kind that happens behind the scenes—subtle, playful, and lighthearted. Think about the little moments, like a teasing comment about how they always order the same thing at a restaurant or the way you laugh at a silly joke they make.
The key is to find a balance. A simple smile or a playful comment can convey interest without being too much. For example, if your date tells you they love hiking but they tend to get lost easily, you could say something like, “So, you’re telling me you need a personal guide? I could get behind that!” It’s lighthearted, humorous, and most importantly, it keeps the conversation fun without putting too much pressure on the situation.
By keeping it subtle, you allow your date to feel at ease. It takes the pressure off them to be perfect and allows both of you to enjoy the interaction more naturally. Flirting doesn’t need to be a performance—it’s about creating an environment where both of you can feel comfortable and authentic.
Now, let’s talk about something incredibly important in the flirting game: active listening. When we’re on a date, we often get caught up in thinking about what to say next, how we’re coming across, or if we’re being interesting enough. But the best way to make an impression? Truly listening to your date.
Active listening means you’re fully engaged in the conversation, giving your date your full attention and responding thoughtfully. It’s about showing that you care about what they’re saying and that you’re genuinely interested in getting to know them better. When you listen actively, you’re also giving them space to open up, and that can create an immediate connection.
For example, if your date mentions they recently traveled to Japan, instead of simply saying, “That’s cool!” you could follow up with something like, “What was the most memorable experience you had there?” This shows that you’re not just hearing their words but are genuinely curious and invested in their experiences. It’s a great way to build rapport and let them know you’re not just there to impress them—you’re there to connect.
While your words are important, body language often speaks louder than anything you can say. Whether you realize it or not, your body is constantly communicating how you feel. How you sit, stand, and move tells your date whether you’re relaxed, engaged, or distracted.
Small gestures can go a long way in flirting. A light touch on the arm, a subtle lean in when they’re speaking, or maintaining good eye contact—all these body language cues help signal your interest. And the great thing is, when done naturally, these cues can be just as effective as words.
For example, if you’re sitting at a café on your date and you lean in slightly when they’re sharing a funny story, you’re not just showing that you’re interested—you’re inviting them into your space. It’s an invitation to connect further. And when they respond by leaning in too, that’s when the magic happens—the unspoken connection that tells you both that there’s potential for more.
Flirting through body language doesn’t mean making grand gestures or being overly touchy. It’s about being present and showing that you’re engaged with your date in a subtle, but meaningful way.
It’s easy to get caught up in overthinking how to flirt or trying to figure out if your date is into you. But here’s a secret—when you let go of the pressure and allow yourself to have fun, everything flows much more naturally. Flirting on a first date doesn’t need to feel like a test or an assignment. It’s supposed to be a fun, lighthearted experience that sets the stage for more great dates ahead.
When was the last time you had a genuinely fun date? Was it when you were trying too hard to impress, or when you were both laughing, chatting, and enjoying each other's company? Flirting becomes effortless when you're present, enjoying the moment, and letting the connection grow naturally.
Sometimes, it's the small moments—like sharing a laugh or swapping embarrassing stories—that make a first date truly special. When you focus on having fun, you create an environment where both of you can relax, flirt, and let the chemistry grow. That’s the secret to a great date.
One of the best things about using a platform like MixerDates is that it takes the guesswork out of the equation. By connecting with someone who already shares your interests and values, you’ve got a head start on making a real connection. No more swiping through countless profiles hoping for a spark—on MixerDates, you already know there’s something in common.
When you’re already on the same page with your date, flirting comes more easily. There’s less of that awkward, “Are we even on the same wavelength?” feeling, and more of the fun, “Wow, we really click!” vibe. Whether you’re talking about favorite hobbies, movies, or life goals, the conversation flows naturally, making the flirting feel effortless.
If you're looking for a place to meet like-minded people and build genuine connections, MixerDates is the perfect platform. It's a great place to find someone who appreciates you for who you are and who you can naturally flirt with, without the stress.
Flirting on a first date is all about confidence, connection, and fun. When you let go of the pressure and focus on enjoying the experience, the chemistry will naturally follow. Remember, the best way to flirt is by being yourself—let your personality shine through, listen with intention, and embrace the moment.
And if you’re ready to meet someone new, who’s just as interested in making a connection as you are, MixerDates is the perfect place to start. So go ahead, take the leap, and see where it leads. Who knows? Your next great connection might be just a click away.
Sign up for MixerDates today and start your journey to exciting first dates and meaningful connections!
Please consider the histroy of humanity from biological perpsecitve and current known fact in nearby universe, which expo-planet (from the Sol system perspective) is most likely to have civlizaed society? Please add percentage next to it in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanet civilization likelihoodを28 秒行う
Evaluating planetary prospects
OK, I’m looking at the likelihood of a civilized society on an exoplanet within our Solar System. I’ll consider biological history and current space knowledge, aiming to identify the most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from our Solar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard's Star, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1, focusing on their habitable zones and available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilized society likelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m noting key exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which have Earth-like characteristics and are in habitable zones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advanced civilizations.
I'm gathering info on planets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, considering factors like magnetic fields, atmospheres, and proximity to G-type stars for their potential to support advanced civilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despite being close and around a red dwarf star, might support life if it has a magnetic field and atmosphere. This makes me think about its potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimating civilization probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculative percentages based on the Drake equation and the lack of evidence for intelligent life.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names and civilization likelihood percentages, grounded in the long timeline of life's evolution, despite the speculative nature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering their star types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advanced civilizations from our solar system's viewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due to its closeness and observational potential, despite concerns about its flare star dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'm focusing on exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, and K2-18b, aiming to chart their likelihood of hosting a civilized society based on current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society, considering Earth's long biological history.
Refining odds
I'm considering the astronomical timeline for intelligent life on Earth, leading me to assign even lower speculative odds for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrary percentages, clearly noting the speculative nature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience's basic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrary percentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculative nature, and ensuring the data is accessible for young audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating a markdown table with speculative percentages for the likelihood of civilized life on exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoretical nature and considering the understanding level of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mapping out a markdown chart with speculative percentages for the likelihood of a civilized society on exoplanets, mindful of the complexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecing together markdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b's reduced civilized life chance due to the red dwarf's activity. This inclusion highlights the speculative nature of the analysis.
Piecing together speculative odds
I’m detailing a markdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanet likelihoods, considering environmental challenges and adding a disclaimer about the speculative nature and lack of evidence.
Piecing together
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b for its proximity and silent star, but I’ll add a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advanced civilizations' hypothetical likelihood.
Assessing civilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligent life on Earth, which suggests that the odds of any habitable planet developing a complex civilization might be as low as a few percent.
Below is a very speculative chart that—based on what we know about Earth’s long, winding path from simple life to a “civilized society” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives some fun, made‑up percentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists have not yet found any proof of life (let alone advanced civilizations) on any exoplanet. These numbers are just playful estimates to help you think about the ideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an Advanced Civilization on Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet Estimated Likelihood of a Civilized Society
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
How Did We (Very Roughly) Guess These Numbers?
Earth’s Example:
On Earth, life began as simple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that built complex societies. This long journey suggests that—even if a planet is in the “habitable zone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilized society might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
This is the closest exoplanet to us. Even though its star (Proxima Centauri) is a red dwarf that sometimes sends out strong flares (which might harm life), its closeness makes it one of our most interesting candidates. That’s why we give it a slightly higher guess (~2%).
These planets are part of a group orbiting a very cool star. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaning one side always faces the star), so the chance of a complex, advanced civilization might be a bit lower.
LHS 1140 b:
This planet is promising in some ways but is a little farther away and around a dimmer star, so our playful estimate is even lower.
All of these percentages are extremely rough guesses based on what little we understand about the conditions for life and intelligence. Scientists use ideas like the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concrete evidence, these numbers remain just for fun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring these ideas—and remember, space is full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equation itself and see if this euqation is acculate or more opition in the equation you will use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation's value
OK, let me see. The Drake Equation isn't a precise formula; it's more of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrial civilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluating its conceptual nature, its uncertain parameters, and its criticism to conclude on its reliability as an accurate predictive model.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mapping out the Drake Equation as a conceptual guide, detailing its parameters, which are often based on estimates or opinions, to evaluate its reliability for predicting extraterrestrial civilizations.
The Drake Equation is a famous formula that was created to help scientists think about the many factors involved in estimating the number of detectable extraterrestrial civilizations in our galaxy. However, when we look at the equation closely, we see that it is more of a conceptual framework or heuristic tool than a precise, predictive formula. Let’s break down why:
The equation is usually written as:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The average rate of star formation per year in our galaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of those stars that have planetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The average number of planets that could potentially support life per star with planets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of those planets where life actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction of planets with life where intelligent life evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction of civilizations that develop technology that releases detectable signals into space.
𝐿
L: The length of time such civilizations release detectable signals.
Why the Drake Equation Is More of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction of stars with planets), have become better known through modern astronomy.
The parameters related to the development of life and intelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—are based on very limited data. For example, Earth is the only planet we know where life has developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for these factors. This means that the values chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of Possible Values:
Because many of these factors are not well-constrained, if you change one of the more uncertain parameters even slightly, the final estimate for
𝑁
N (the number of civilizations) can vary by many orders of magnitude. This wide range shows that the equation can lead to very different outcomes based on personal or theoretical assumptions.
The Drake Equation was never meant to provide a precise answer. Instead, it serves as a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrial civilizations. It encourages discussion about the relative importance of different factors and highlights where our scientific knowledge is limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate or More Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In the sense of being a strict mathematical model with well-defined inputs and predictable outputs, the Drake Equation is not accurate. Its accuracy is limited by the extreme uncertainties in several of its key parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning the evolution of life and intelligence, are based on opinion, interpretation, and the single example of Earth. Therefore, while the structure of the equation is logical, the numbers you put into it (and hence the final result) are often more reflective of our current opinions and assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equation is a valuable tool for framing the question of extraterrestrial life. It helps scientists and enthusiasts break down a complex problem into smaller, more manageable questions. However, because several of its factors are highly uncertain and subject to personal interpretation, it is more of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of the number of extraterrestrial civilizations.
In summary, while the Drake Equation is useful for thinking about the various factors that might lead to the emergence of a civilization, its outputs should be taken as highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the long history of Sol system and nearby planets and see if there is any possiblites that in one time intelligent life emerged in nearby planets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-human intelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-human intelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligent life forms in the Sol system and neighboring planets, and how this might factor into the equation.
Piecing together possibilities
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligent life, possibly on Mars or Europa, into the Drake Equation for the Sol system and neighboring planets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligent life emerging on Mars or Venus, though Earth remains the only known life-supporting planet in the solar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligent life could have emerged on planets like Mars, Venus, or Europa, and how this possibility aligns with the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligent life on Mars or Venus could intersect with the assumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems to focus solely on Earth-based evolution.
I’m piecing together the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligent life in the solar system. Mars, Venus, and Titan present challenges, but Europa and Enceladus might harbor microbial life.
Please consider the histroy of humanity from biological perpsecitve and current known fact in nearby universe, which expo-planet (from the Sol system perspective) is most likely to have civlizaed society? Please add percentage next to it in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanet civilization likelihoodを28 秒行う
Evaluating planetary prospects
OK, I’m looking at the likelihood of a civilized society on an exoplanet within our Solar System. I’ll consider biological history and current space knowledge, aiming to identify the most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from our Solar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard's Star, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1, focusing on their habitable zones and available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilized society likelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m noting key exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which have Earth-like characteristics and are in habitable zones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advanced civilizations.
I'm gathering info on planets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, considering factors like magnetic fields, atmospheres, and proximity to G-type stars for their potential to support advanced civilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despite being close and around a red dwarf star, might support life if it has a magnetic field and atmosphere. This makes me think about its potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimating civilization probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculative percentages based on the Drake equation and the lack of evidence for intelligent life.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names and civilization likelihood percentages, grounded in the long timeline of life's evolution, despite the speculative nature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering their star types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advanced civilizations from our solar system's viewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due to its closeness and observational potential, despite concerns about its flare star dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'm focusing on exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, and K2-18b, aiming to chart their likelihood of hosting a civilized society based on current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society, considering Earth's long biological history.
Refining odds
I'm considering the astronomical timeline for intelligent life on Earth, leading me to assign even lower speculative odds for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrary percentages, clearly noting the speculative nature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience's basic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrary percentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculative nature, and ensuring the data is accessible for young audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating a markdown table with speculative percentages for the likelihood of civilized life on exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoretical nature and considering the understanding level of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mapping out a markdown chart with speculative percentages for the likelihood of a civilized society on exoplanets, mindful of the complexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecing together markdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b's reduced civilized life chance due to the red dwarf's activity. This inclusion highlights the speculative nature of the analysis.
Piecing together speculative odds
I’m detailing a markdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanet likelihoods, considering environmental challenges and adding a disclaimer about the speculative nature and lack of evidence.
Piecing together
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b for its proximity and silent star, but I’ll add a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advanced civilizations' hypothetical likelihood.
Assessing civilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligent life on Earth, which suggests that the odds of any habitable planet developing a complex civilization might be as low as a few percent.
Below is a very speculative chart that—based on what we know about Earth’s long, winding path from simple life to a “civilized society” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives some fun, made‑up percentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists have not yet found any proof of life (let alone advanced civilizations) on any exoplanet. These numbers are just playful estimates to help you think about the ideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an Advanced Civilization on Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet Estimated Likelihood of a Civilized Society
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
How Did We (Very Roughly) Guess These Numbers?
Earth’s Example:
On Earth, life began as simple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that built complex societies. This long journey suggests that—even if a planet is in the “habitable zone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilized society might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
This is the closest exoplanet to us. Even though its star (Proxima Centauri) is a red dwarf that sometimes sends out strong flares (which might harm life), its closeness makes it one of our most interesting candidates. That’s why we give it a slightly higher guess (~2%).
These planets are part of a group orbiting a very cool star. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaning one side always faces the star), so the chance of a complex, advanced civilization might be a bit lower.
LHS 1140 b:
This planet is promising in some ways but is a little farther away and around a dimmer star, so our playful estimate is even lower.
All of these percentages are extremely rough guesses based on what little we understand about the conditions for life and intelligence. Scientists use ideas like the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concrete evidence, these numbers remain just for fun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring these ideas—and remember, space is full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equation itself and see if this euqation is acculate or more opition in the equation you will use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation's value
OK, let me see. The Drake Equation isn't a precise formula; it's more of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrial civilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluating its conceptual nature, its uncertain parameters, and its criticism to conclude on its reliability as an accurate predictive model.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mapping out the Drake Equation as a conceptual guide, detailing its parameters, which are often based on estimates or opinions, to evaluate its reliability for predicting extraterrestrial civilizations.
The Drake Equation is a famous formula that was created to help scientists think about the many factors involved in estimating the number of detectable extraterrestrial civilizations in our galaxy. However, when we look at the equation closely, we see that it is more of a conceptual framework or heuristic tool than a precise, predictive formula. Let’s break down why:
The equation is usually written as:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The average rate of star formation per year in our galaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of those stars that have planetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The average number of planets that could potentially support life per star with planets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of those planets where life actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction of planets with life where intelligent life evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction of civilizations that develop technology that releases detectable signals into space.
𝐿
L: The length of time such civilizations release detectable signals.
Why the Drake Equation Is More of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction of stars with planets), have become better known through modern astronomy.
The parameters related to the development of life and intelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—are based on very limited data. For example, Earth is the only planet we know where life has developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for these factors. This means that the values chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of Possible Values:
Because many of these factors are not well-constrained, if you change one of the more uncertain parameters even slightly, the final estimate for
𝑁
N (the number of civilizations) can vary by many orders of magnitude. This wide range shows that the equation can lead to very different outcomes based on personal or theoretical assumptions.
The Drake Equation was never meant to provide a precise answer. Instead, it serves as a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrial civilizations. It encourages discussion about the relative importance of different factors and highlights where our scientific knowledge is limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate or More Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In the sense of being a strict mathematical model with well-defined inputs and predictable outputs, the Drake Equation is not accurate. Its accuracy is limited by the extreme uncertainties in several of its key parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning the evolution of life and intelligence, are based on opinion, interpretation, and the single example of Earth. Therefore, while the structure of the equation is logical, the numbers you put into it (and hence the final result) are often more reflective of our current opinions and assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equation is a valuable tool for framing the question of extraterrestrial life. It helps scientists and enthusiasts break down a complex problem into smaller, more manageable questions. However, because several of its factors are highly uncertain and subject to personal interpretation, it is more of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of the number of extraterrestrial civilizations.
In summary, while the Drake Equation is useful for thinking about the various factors that might lead to the emergence of a civilization, its outputs should be taken as highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the long history of Sol system and nearby planets and see if there is any possiblites that in one time intelligent life emerged in nearby planets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-human intelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-human intelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligent life forms in the Sol system and neighboring planets, and how this might factor into the equation.
Piecing together possibilities
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligent life, possibly on Mars or Europa, into the Drake Equation for the Sol system and neighboring planets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligent life emerging on Mars or Venus, though Earth remains the only known life-supporting planet in the solar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligent life could have emerged on planets like Mars, Venus, or Europa, and how this possibility aligns with the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligent life on Mars or Venus could intersect with the assumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems to focus solely on Earth-based evolution.
I’m piecing together the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligent life in the solar system. Mars, Venus, and Titan present challenges, but Europa and Enceladus might harbor microbial life.