「inclusive」を含む日記

■anond:20250418190540

現在進行形でイギリスに住んでるけど、ちょっといくつかのポイントを箇条書きしていきたいと思う。

・衣食住

至極当たり前なんだけど、稼ぎのレベルで生活水準は大きく変わってくる。駐在員みたいに高給取りであれば問題ないだろうけど、日系企業の現地採用は給料が安いとこが多かったりする。ここ最近は物価の上昇が著しくCost of Living Crisisが叫ばれて久しいため、懐にある程度の余裕がないとせっかく移住してもヒーヒー言う羽目になる。家賃も家の値段も高騰してるのでロンドン内の家探しはすごい大変。

物価は円が弱いこともあって体感日本の約1.5~3倍程度。ただし青果と花は安い。フルーツも日本より安いし豊富だけど、それはブランド化されてないからというのもあり、買う前に品質チェックしないと見えない部分にカビ生えてたり傷んでたりとかは普通にある。

外食も基本高い。それでも天気のいい日はうちの近所のパブやレストランは賑わってるけど。イギリスは「メシマズ」が擦られてるけど、最近は移民増加によって食文化が豊かになっており、それに伴いイギリス人の舌も肥えてきてるので美味しいところが沢山ある（でも基本高い）。Mayfair Chippyのフィッシュ&チップスとかHarwood Armsのサンデーローストとかすごい美味しいよ（高いけど）。もちろんクオリティの低いメシもまだたくさんあるからいろいろ試してみるかグルメさんをフォローしましょう。

日本食はブームになって久しいものの、手軽に手に入る寿司はサーモンとかエビとかアボカドとか。最近はkatsuが流行ってきてるけど、日本のトンカツとは似て非なるもの。日本の食材もまぁまぁ手に入る（これに関しては後ほど）。

気候は夏は最＆高。日本と比べたら暑くなりすぎないし天気もいい日が多い。秋冬はずっとどんよりしてるからメンタルやられる人はやられる。ビタミンDのサプリ必須。あと光熱費も高騰してるので貧しい家庭は食費か光熱費かという究極の選択を迫られることもあるらしい…。

水はロンドンはかなりの硬質。ケトルとかシャワーヘッドとかガビガビになるから定期的にお酢とかで綺麗にする必要あり。髪傷みやすい人とか女性なんかは特に影響あるみたいね。男は抜け毛がすごくなるので最初ギョッとする。もちろんウォッシュレットなんてほぼありません（あっても硬質の水だと目詰まり起こすかと）。でも紅茶は硬質の水のほうが美味しい…らしい。あとビールとかワイン好きなら飲む場所だけはたくさんあるのでいいかも。

・ロンドンかそれ以外か

第一に住む場所が首都ロンドンかそれ以外かで全然違うと心得た方がいい。と言うか、ロンドンだけ異質で別の国みたいな言い方をする時もある。これはデータにも現れてて、ロンドンを差し引くとイギリス全体のGDPはアメリカの一番貧しい州以下になるらしい。そのロンドンも金融街であるシティが全部担ってるみたいな感じ。

ロンドンは人口構成も他と違って、住んでる人の実に40%がイギリス国外で生まれたForeign National。なので街をゆく人々は千差万別、The多様性。歩いてて英語以外の言葉がすごい飛び交ってるのが面白い。

地方に関してはあまり知識がないので多くのことは言えないけど、地域によって貧富の差が激しい印象。バーミンガムとかコベントリーとかは治安も街並みも悪いと聞く。

マンチェスターは意外と日本人多いらしいね。

・治安

みんな気になる安全性。個人的な経験から言うとそんなに悪くはないんじゃないかな。もちろんエリアや時間帯にもよるけど、アメリカほど命を気にするような乱射事件とかは起こらないし、たまーに銃撃事件が起きても治安悪いエリアのギャング同士の抗争とか。

テロも大きいのはここ最近ないし。

一番被害に遭う確率が大きいのは窃盗、盗難系かな。最近までチャリで手に持ってるスマホを掻っ攫ってく手口がよくあったけど、警察も重い腰を挙げたのか減少傾向にあるらしい。スリもいるので当たり前だけど身の回りの品、貴重品は常に気にかけ外ポケットとかに入れないようにしましょう。

窃盗犯は明らかに盗みやすいカモを狙うので、ガード固いとこをわざわざ攻めにはいきません。

人種差別もみんな気になるところかもだけど、個人的にはそこまで明らかなやつに遭遇したことはない。地方行った時にビール片手に持ってる兄ちゃんに「ニーハオ」って声かけられた時はちょっとイラッとしたけども。

これも体感だけどやり返される可能性の少ない（と思われている）アジア系の女性は悲しいかな両方のターゲットになりやすいよね。在外邦人のX見てても嫌な思いしてるのは女性が多い印象。これは日本でも言えることだけど男女で体感治安が違うのは万国共通なのかも。

反移民感情に関しては間違いなくあるけど、afdが躍進してるドイツやルペンが支持されてるフランスなんかと比べるとマシな印象。先の暴動で難民の宿泊施設が放火されたりと言ったこともあったけど、その後キッチリ犯人や煽動者も逮捕されてるみたいだからまだそこらへんの矜持はあるんじゃないかな。15年政権握ってた保守党から左寄りの労働党に最近変わったけど、どちらかというと保守寄りな左派なので今後移民の移住・定住要件とかは厳しくしていく方針らしい。

・医療

ドイツ在住増田は医療の酷さを嘆いていたけど、イギリスはそっち方面はまだマシかと。この前子供が生まれたんだけど、医療費全部タダなんでその点はすごくお得。ただNHSが逼迫しているので、たとえ帝王切開みたいな大きな手術受けたとしてしても一晩で家帰らされる（強制ではないけど）。緊急性のない手術は数ヶ月待ちとかは普通にあるみたい。そういや一回A&E（救急科）行ったとき存在自体忘れられて8時間待たされたことあったわ…。あと耳鼻科とか皮膚科とかいった専門医に直接いけるわけではなくて、まずはGPと言われる医者に診てもらってそこから専門医に繋げてもらうシステム。なので医療は日本が断然上。その代わり医者や看護師の方々は激務よね。

・日本人コミュニティ

イギリス全体では日本人は5万人ほどいて、ヨーロッパでは最大。ロンドン首都圏に限定すると3万人ちょっと。ちなみにその次がパリの約2万人で次がデュッセルドルフの6000人。それだけあってやっぱりよく日本人とか日本語話す人を見かける。ドーバー近くのパブで店員の白人の兄ちゃんに「もしかして日本人ですか？」って日本語で声かけられた時は流石にびっくりしたけども。でも意外と日本人街とかはない。デュッセルドルフにはあるのに…。

駐在とかの日本人はロンドンの西側に固まって住んでる印象。そっちに日本語学校とかもあるし、ガチ和食のお店とかもそっちに多い。

Japan CentreもあるしWasoとかのオンラインショップもあるんで、日本食が恋しくなった時はオプションはそれなりにあるんじゃないかな。最近はCoCo壱と丸亀製麺も進出してきてて、前者は日本の味をキープしてるけど後者はあんまりだった…。一風堂もあって味は全く一緒。

・日本と似ているのか

いくつかのコメントでイギリスは日本と似てるみたいながあったけど、個人的にはイマイチピンとこない。こっちは未だ結構な階級社会だし、あんまり似てると感じる要素は思いつかないかな。「大陸の外れにある島国」と言う点では歴史的な出来事や特徴で似通って部分はあると思う。下記動画参考。

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BQU7DPjmlaA&ab_channel=MasterofRoflness

・結論

住めばまぁまぁ都。少なくともイギリスだけはやめとけ、みたいな感じではない。物価とか生活費、家賃あたりはネック。

日本にBBCの撮影で来てた全盲のイギリス人女性レポーターが、日本は「Very accessible but not very inclusive」と評していた。点字ブロックやエレベータのアクセスなどはとても進んでいるものの、社会全体として障害のある人々など多様性の受け入れに関してはイギリスの方が進んでいると言う意味らしい。

他にもXで「日本は暮らしやすいけど生きづらい、海外はその逆」みたいに言ってる人もいて確かになとは思う。日本で生きづらさを感じているなら外出てみるのも手よね。

個人的に一番気に入っているのは他のヨーロッパ諸国に国内旅行感覚でいけるとこ。

Permalink | 記事への反応(3) | 06:11

ツイートシェア

■これは消されて当然としか

読むだけ時間の無駄だった

Featured Spotlight Interview

Yoshihiro Mochizuki

Japanese Language Lecturer

How does your work engage with DEI topics? Could you share a particular story related to your work in DEI?

As a Japanese language teacher at the University of Michigan, my journey in DEI education has been a profoundly enriching experience that reaches far beyond the classroom. In 2023, I had privilege of speaking at various conferences and teacher training workshops, including delivering a keynote address at the fourth Northwest Conference on Japanese Pedagogy hosted by the University of Washington. This milestone allowed me to advocate for the profound importance of DEI and social justice in Japanese language education.

Through these experiences, I have come to a profound realization: while children and students often readily embrace DEI principles, having grown up in an era where these concepts are more ingrained in education, our primary focus must be on the education of adults, particularly educators themselves.

During my presentations and workshops, I have engaged with educators, many of whom have decades of experience. They raise questions that sometimes reveal unconscious biases or microaggressions. Yet, they openly admit feeling out of touch with the ever-evolving landscape of diversity and inclusion. They express genuine concerns about their ability to relate to and support students from diverse backgrounds.

This interaction spotlights a substantial challenge faced by educators today, a reminder that the world is in constant flux, and it is our shared responsibility as educators to adapt alongside it. These encounters are what drive my passion for DEI education. My work extends beyond the classroom, aiming to bridge the gap between theory and practice, guiding fellow educators toward inclusivity, understanding, and social justice.

As we move forward, it is imperative to recognize that fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion is not solely the responsibility of students but a collective endeavor that starts with us, the educators.

In conclusion, my journey in Japanese language education has taught me that the true power of DEI education lies in its ability to transform educators. This transformation, in turn, shapes a more inclusive future for our students. Embracing DEI principles enriches not only our teaching but also our society as a whole. Together, as a community of educators dedicated to diversity, equity, and inclusion, we take significant strides toward creating a more just and inclusive world, one classroom at a time.

あなたの仕事はDEIのテーマとどのように関わっていますか？DEIに関する具体的なエピソードがあれば教えていただけますか？

ミシガン大学で日本語教師としてDEI教育に携わってきた私の歩みは、教室の枠をはるかに超えた、非常に豊かな経験でした。2023年には、ワシントン大学主催の第4回北西日本語教育学会議での基調講演をはじめ、様々な会議や教師研修ワークショップで講演する機会に恵まれました。この節目を通して、日本語教育におけるDEIと社会正義の深遠な重要性を訴えることができました。

これらの経験を通じて、私は深い認識に達しました。それは、DEI の原則が教育に深く根ざした時代に育った子供や学生は、多くの場合、積極的に DEI の原則を受け入れますが、私たちが主に重点を置くべきは、大人、特に教育者自身の教育であるということです。

プレゼンテーションやワークショップを通して、私は教育者の方々と交流してきました。その多くは数十年の経験を持つ方々です。彼らは、時に無意識の偏見やマイクロアグレッションを露呈するような疑問を投げかけます。しかし同時に、彼らは常に進化を続ける多様性と包摂性という状況に疎外感を抱いていることを率直に認めています。多様な背景を持つ生徒たちと関わり、サポートしていく能力について、真摯な懸念を表明しています。

この交流は、今日の教育者が直面する重大な課題を浮き彫りにし、世界は常に変化し続けており、教育者としてそれに適応していくことが共通の責任であることを改めて認識させてくれます。こうした出会いが、DEI教育への私の情熱を駆り立てています。私の仕事は教室にとどまらず、理論と実践のギャップを埋め、他の教育者を包摂性、理解、そして社会正義へと導くことを目指しています。

今後、多様性、公平性、包括性を育むことは学生だけの責任ではなく、私たち教育者から始まる共同の取り組みであることを認識することが不可欠です。

最後に、日本語教育に携わってきた経験を通して、DEI教育の真の力は教育者を変革する力にあることを学びました。この変革は、ひいては生徒たちにとってよりインクルーシブな未来を形作ります。DEIの原則を受け入れることは、私たちの教育だけでなく、社会全体を豊かにします。多様性、公平性、そしてインクルージョンに献身する教育者のコミュニティとして、私たちは共に、一つ一つの教室から、より公正でインクルーシブな世界の創造に向けて大きく前進していきます。

https://lsa.umich.edu/asian/dei/spotlight.html

もっちりんだ 🇺🇸 🇯🇵 🏳️‍🌈

@mochiey

学部からのお達しで、私のこのページ、もうすぐ消えることになったので、よかったら消える前に読んでくださ～い。

Spotlight

Featured Spotlight Interview

https://x.com/mochiey/status/1912156111953662160

もっちりんだ 🇺🇸 🇯🇵 🏳️‍🌈

@mochiey

Teaching Professor of Japanese Language | University of Michigan 🇺🇸生活・Podcasts・日本語教育・人権 (LGBTQ+, フェミニズム), etc. Posts are my own. 他のSNSも 全て

@mochiey

でやってます。

すごく軽いね。もうすこしなんかないの？学問の自由とか言うことはないの？

大変申し訳ないのですが、これは消されて当然だし

Big Lizard's wife（カカシ姐さん）

@biglizardswife

6分

大学のサイトからDEIのページを消さないと、というより大学からDEIを排除しないと連邦政府からの支援金がもらえなくなるからね。

こういう報いを受けても仕方ないのでは。だって何一つ書いていないんだもの。

内容の問題点

抽象的な表現の連続

「profound importance」「profound realization」「shared responsibility」「transform educators」など、抽象度の高いフレーズばかりで、具体的な教育実践が見えません。

成果の提示がない

例：「どんな学生に、どのような教材を用いて、どういった変化が見られたのか」といった具体的な成果・実例が欠如。

エピソードが曖昧

「教育者と話して無意識のバイアスに気づいた」ことを語っていますが、どんな内容だったのか、どういう改善に繋がったのか、事例がないため説得力が弱い。

DEIの定義がない

そもそもこの文章では、DEI（Diversity, Equity, Inclusion）を日本語教育の中でどう具体的に扱うのかが一切記述されていません。

たとえば「教材に出てくる名前や職業を見直した」「LGBTQの観点を授業で扱った」などの実施例が欠落。

結論

トランプがカネを出さないというのは極めて至極まっとうで、この文章で人が感動することも共感することも同情することも理解することもない。

なに言ってるんだ。そのアカウント名もふざけている場合じゃないだろう。

大学からたたき出されないだけマシなのでは？

あと大学もお金をもらわなくても大丈夫なんだから、大学にお金を出さなくてもいいのかも。

日本も見習うべきですね。

Permalink | 記事への反応(1) | 01:18

ツイートシェア

■Best Dating App Opening Lines

Let’s face it: starting a conversation on a dating app can feel terrifying. You see someone you’re interested in, you type out a message, and then… you delete it. “Is this too boring?” “Will they even respond?” “What if I sound awkward?”

We’ve all been there. That first message can make or break your chances of connecting with someone amazing. But here’s the good news: you don’t have to overthink it. With the right opening line, you can spark a conversation that feels natural, fun, and meaningful.

At MixerDates, we believe that every great connection starts with a great conversation. That’s why we’ve put together this guide to help you craft the best dating app opening lines—ones that stand out, show your personality, and lead to real connections. Ready to ditch the “hey” and start making an impact? Let’s dive in!

[:contents]

Why Your First Message Matters

Before we get into the best opening lines, let’s talk about why your first message is so important.

1. First Impressions Count

Your opening line is your chance to make a great first impression. It’s the gateway to a conversation that could lead to something special. A thoughtful, creative message shows that you’re genuinely interested—not just swiping mindlessly.

2. It Sets the Tone

Your first message sets the tone for the entire conversation. A boring or generic opener might lead to a dull chat, while a fun or intriguing one can spark excitement and curiosity.

3. It Shows Effort

Let’s be real: everyone loves feeling special. When you put effort into your opening line, it shows that you care enough to stand out. And on MixerDates, where we value authenticity and positivity, that effort goes a long way.

The Best Dating App Opening Lines (And Why They Work)

Now, let’s get to the good stuff—the best dating app opening lines that actually work. These are divided into categories to suit different personalities and situations.

1. The Playful Opener

• Example: “If you were a vegetable, you’d be a cute-cumber. So, what’s your favorite veggie?”

• Why It Works: Humor is a universal icebreaker. It shows you’re fun and don’t take yourself too seriously.

2. The Compliment Opener

• Example: “I have to say, your smile is contagious. What’s the story behind it?”

• Why It Works: Compliments make people feel good, especially when they’re specific and genuine.

3. The Question Opener

• Example: “If you could teleport anywhere right now, where would you go and why?”

• Why It Works: Questions encourage engagement and give the other person something interesting to respond to.

4. The Shared Interest Opener

• Example: “I noticed you love hiking too! What’s the most breathtaking trail you’ve ever been on?”

• Why It Works: It shows you’ve paid attention to their profile and creates an instant connection over shared interests.

5. The Bold Opener

• Example: “I’ll be honest—I swiped right because you seem like someone who’d make a great partner in crime. What’s the most adventurous thing you’ve ever done?”

• Why It Works: Confidence is attractive, and this type of opener shows you’re not afraid to be bold.

6. The Quirky Opener

• Example: “Quick: pineapple on pizza—yes or no? This could determine our compatibility.”

• Why It Works: Quirky openers are memorable and show off your unique personality.

Tips for Crafting Your Own Opening Lines

While the examples above are great starting points, the best opening lines are the ones that feel authentic to you. Here are some tips to help you craft your own:

1. Personalize It

Reference something from their profile—a photo, a hobby, or a shared interest. It shows you’re paying attention and not just copying and pasting.

2. Keep It Light and Fun

Avoid heavy or overly serious topics right off the bat. Keep the tone light and playful to make the conversation enjoyable.

3. Be Yourself

Don’t try to be someone you’re not. If you’re naturally funny, lean into that. If you’re more thoughtful, go for a sincere compliment or question.

4. Avoid Clichés

“Hey” or “What’s up?” might be easy, but they’re also forgettable. Put in a little effort to stand out.

5. End with a Question

This gives the other person an easy way to respond and keeps the conversation flowing.

Why MixerDates is the Perfect Place to Practice Your Opening Lines

At MixerDates, we’re all about creating a positive, inclusive space where you can feel comfortable being yourself. Here’s why our platform is the best place to put these opening lines into practice:

1. A Welcoming Community

We welcome everyone, no matter who you are or who you love. Our platform is designed to be a safe space where you can connect with like-minded people.

2. Profiles That Spark Conversations

Our users create detailed profiles that make it easy to find shared interests and craft personalized opening lines.

3. A Focus on Authenticity

We encourage our community to be genuine and kind, so you can feel confident starting conversations without fear of judgment or rejection.

4. Success Stories

Don’t just take our word for it—here’s what one of our users had to say:

“I met my partner on MixerDates, and it all started with a simple message about our shared love for travel. The conversation flowed naturally, and the rest is history. I’m so grateful for this platform!”

Key Elements to Finding a Mutual Connection

While a great opening line can spark a conversation, building a real connection takes more than just a clever message. Here are the key elements to look for when seeking a meaningful connection:

1. Shared Values and Goals

A strong connection starts with alignment on the things that matter most. Do you share similar values, life goals, or visions for the future?

2. Emotional Availability

Look for someone who is willing to share their thoughts, feelings, and vulnerabilities—and who encourages you to do the same.

3. Mutual Effort

Healthy relationships are a two-way street. Both people should be putting in effort to communicate, plan dates, and support each other.

4. Respect for Individuality

A true connection allows both people to be themselves without judgment. Look for someone who celebrates your uniqueness and encourages you to pursue your passions.

5. Open and Honest Communication

Communication is the foundation of any strong relationship. A mutual connection thrives on honesty, transparency, and the ability to resolve conflicts in a healthy way.

At MixerDates, we’re here to help you find these key elements in a partner. Our platform is designed to connect you with people who share your values and are looking for the same things you are. Starting a conversation on a dating app doesn’t have to be stressful. With the right opening line, you can spark a connection that feels natural, fun, and meaningful. And at MixerDates, we’re here to help you every step of the way.

So, what are you waiting for? Craft that perfect opening line, join MixerDates, and start connecting with people who value authenticity and positivity. Your perfect match is out there—and they’re just one message away.

Permalink | 記事への反応(0) | 12:11

ツイートシェア

■Chatgptが答えた異星人の存在可能性とのそのロジック

Please consider the histroy of humanity from biological perpsecitve and current known fact in nearby universe, which expo-planet (from the Sol system perspective) is most likely to have civlizaed society? Please add percentage next to it in the chart

ChatGPT

Reasoned about exoplanet civilization likelihoodを28 秒行う

Evaluating planetary prospects

OK, I’m looking at the likelihood of a civilized society on an exoplanet within our Solar System. I’ll consider biological history and current space knowledge, aiming to identify the most promising candidate.

Identifying potential candidates

I'm considering exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from our Solar System.

Assessing potential candidates

I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard's Star, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1, focusing on their habitable zones and available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilized society likelihoods.

Identifying promising exoplanets

I’m noting key exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which have Earth-like characteristics and are in habitable zones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advanced civilizations.

Assessing habitable zones

I'm gathering info on planets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, considering factors like magnetic fields, atmospheres, and proximity to G-type stars for their potential to support advanced civilizations.

Evaluating exoplanet prospects

I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despite being close and around a red dwarf star, might support life if it has a magnetic field and atmosphere. This makes me think about its potential.

Charting probabilities

I'm estimating civilization probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculative percentages based on the Drake equation and the lack of evidence for intelligent life.

Charting speculative odds

I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names and civilization likelihood percentages, grounded in the long timeline of life's evolution, despite the speculative nature of these figures.

Identifying exoplanet contenders

I’m evaluating exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering their star types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advanced civilizations from our solar system's viewpoint.

Weighing proximity and observation

I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due to its closeness and observational potential, despite concerns about its flare star dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.

Revisiting exoplanet options

I'm focusing on exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, and K2-18b, aiming to chart their likelihood of hosting a civilized society based on current knowledge.

Assessing exoplanet potentials

I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society.

Refining speculative probabilities

I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society, considering Earth's long biological history.

Refining odds

I'm considering the astronomical timeline for intelligent life on Earth, leading me to assign even lower speculative odds for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.

Clarifying speculative nature

I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrary percentages, clearly noting the speculative nature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience's basic understanding of the topic.

Mapping out speculative odds

I’m charting arbitrary percentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculative nature, and ensuring the data is accessible for young audiences with minimal scientific detail.

Crafting a chart

I’m creating a markdown table with speculative percentages for the likelihood of civilized life on exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoretical nature and considering the understanding level of an 8-year-old.

Integrating speculative analysis

I’m mapping out a markdown chart with speculative percentages for the likelihood of a civilized society on exoplanets, mindful of the complexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.

Assessing likelihoods

I’m piecing together markdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b's reduced civilized life chance due to the red dwarf's activity. This inclusion highlights the speculative nature of the analysis.

Piecing together speculative odds

I’m detailing a markdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanet likelihoods, considering environmental challenges and adding a disclaimer about the speculative nature and lack of evidence.

Piecing together

I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b for its proximity and silent star, but I’ll add a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advanced civilizations' hypothetical likelihood.

Assessing civilization probabilities

I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligent life on Earth, which suggests that the odds of any habitable planet developing a complex civilization might be as low as a few percent.

Below is a very speculative chart that—based on what we know about Earth’s long, winding path from simple life to a “civilized society” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives some fun, made‑up percentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists have not yet found any proof of life (let alone advanced civilizations) on any exoplanet. These numbers are just playful estimates to help you think about the ideas!

Speculative Chances of Finding an Advanced Civilization on Nearby Exoplanets

Exoplanet Estimated Likelihood of a Civilized Society

Proxima Centauri b ~2%

TRAPPIST-1 e ~1.5%

TRAPPIST-1 f ~1%

TRAPPIST-1 g ~1%

LHS 1140 b ~0.5%

How Did We (Very Roughly) Guess These Numbers?

Earth’s Example:

On Earth, life began as simple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that built complex societies. This long journey suggests that—even if a planet is in the “habitable zone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilized society might be rare.

Nearby Exoplanets:

Proxima Centauri b:

This is the closest exoplanet to us. Even though its star (Proxima Centauri) is a red dwarf that sometimes sends out strong flares (which might harm life), its closeness makes it one of our most interesting candidates. That’s why we give it a slightly higher guess (~2%).

TRAPPIST-1 System (e, f, g):

These planets are part of a group orbiting a very cool star. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaning one side always faces the star), so the chance of a complex, advanced civilization might be a bit lower.

LHS 1140 b:

This planet is promising in some ways but is a little farther away and around a dimmer star, so our playful estimate is even lower.

A Final Note

All of these percentages are extremely rough guesses based on what little we understand about the conditions for life and intelligence. Scientists use ideas like the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concrete evidence, these numbers remain just for fun and imagination.

Enjoy exploring these ideas—and remember, space is full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!

あなた:

Please examine the Drake Equation itself and see if this euqation is acculate or more opition in the equation you will use

ChatGPT

Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う

re-examining the Drake Equation

evaluating the Drake Equation's value

Clarifying the Drake Equation

OK, let me see. The Drake Equation isn't a precise formula; it's more of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrial civilizations.

Assessing the Drake Equation

Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluating its conceptual nature, its uncertain parameters, and its criticism to conclude on its reliability as an accurate predictive model.

Understanding the Drake Equation

I’m mapping out the Drake Equation as a conceptual guide, detailing its parameters, which are often based on estimates or opinions, to evaluate its reliability for predicting extraterrestrial civilizations.

The Drake Equation is a famous formula that was created to help scientists think about the many factors involved in estimating the number of detectable extraterrestrial civilizations in our galaxy. However, when we look at the equation closely, we see that it is more of a conceptual framework or heuristic tool than a precise, predictive formula. Let’s break down why:

The Drake Equation

The equation is usually written as:

𝑁

=

𝑅

∗

×

𝑓

𝑝

×

𝑛

𝑒

×

𝑓

𝑙

×

𝑓

𝑖

×

𝑓

𝑐

×

𝐿

N=R

∗

×f

p

​

×n

e

​

×f

l

​

×f

i

​

×f

c

​

×L

Where:

𝑅

∗

R

∗

: The average rate of star formation per year in our galaxy.

𝑓

𝑝

f

p

​

: The fraction of those stars that have planetary systems.

𝑛

𝑒

n

e

​

: The average number of planets that could potentially support life per star with planets.

𝑓

𝑙

f

l

​

: The fraction of those planets where life actually develops.

𝑓

𝑖

f

i

​

: The fraction of planets with life where intelligent life evolves.

𝑓

𝑐

f

c

​

: The fraction of civilizations that develop technology that releases detectable signals into space.

𝐿

L: The length of time such civilizations release detectable signals.

Why the Drake Equation Is More of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula

Uncertain Inputs:

Well-Known Parameters:

Some factors, like

𝑅

∗

R

∗

(star formation rate) and

𝑓

𝑝

f

p

​

(fraction of stars with planets), have become better known through modern astronomy.

Highly Speculative Factors:

The parameters related to the development of life and intelligence—

𝑓

𝑙

f

l

​

,

𝑓

𝑖

f

i

​

,

𝑓

𝑐

f

c

​

, and

𝐿

L—are based on very limited data. For example, Earth is the only planet we know where life has developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for these factors. This means that the values chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.

Wide Ranges of Possible Values:

Because many of these factors are not well-constrained, if you change one of the more uncertain parameters even slightly, the final estimate for

𝑁

N (the number of civilizations) can vary by many orders of magnitude. This wide range shows that the equation can lead to very different outcomes based on personal or theoretical assumptions.

Heuristic, Not Predictive:

The Drake Equation was never meant to provide a precise answer. Instead, it serves as a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrial civilizations. It encourages discussion about the relative importance of different factors and highlights where our scientific knowledge is limited.

Is the Drake Equation Accurate or More Opinion-Based?

Accurate?

In the sense of being a strict mathematical model with well-defined inputs and predictable outputs, the Drake Equation is not accurate. Its accuracy is limited by the extreme uncertainties in several of its key parameters.

Opinion-Based?

Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning the evolution of life and intelligence, are based on opinion, interpretation, and the single example of Earth. Therefore, while the structure of the equation is logical, the numbers you put into it (and hence the final result) are often more reflective of our current opinions and assumptions than of robust empirical data.

Conclusion

The Drake Equation is a valuable tool for framing the question of extraterrestrial life. It helps scientists and enthusiasts break down a complex problem into smaller, more manageable questions. However, because several of its factors are highly uncertain and subject to personal interpretation, it is more of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of the number of extraterrestrial civilizations.

In summary, while the Drake Equation is useful for thinking about the various factors that might lead to the emergence of a civilization, its outputs should be taken as highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.

あなた:

Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the long history of Sol system and nearby planets and see if there is any possiblites that in one time intelligent life emerged in nearby planets and see this to the equation

ChatGPT

Reasoned about non-human intelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う

Evaluating non-human intelligence

I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligent life forms in the Sol system and neighboring planets, and how this might factor into the equation.

Piecing together possibilities

I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligent life, possibly on Mars or Europa, into the Drake Equation for the Sol system and neighboring planets.

Reflecting on potential

It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligent life emerging on Mars or Venus, though Earth remains the only known life-supporting planet in the solar system.

Considering other realms

I'm examining if intelligent life could have emerged on planets like Mars, Venus, or Europa, and how this possibility aligns with the predictions of the Drake Equation.

Analyzing parallel evolution

Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligent life on Mars or Venus could intersect with the assumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems to focus solely on Earth-based evolution.

Evaluating life exploration

I’m piecing together the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligent life in the solar system. Mars, Venus, and Titan present challenges, but Europa and Enceladus might harbor microbial life.

Adapting the equ Permalink | 記事への反応(0) | 21:12

ツイートシェア

■Chatgptが答えた異星人の存在可能性とのそのロジック

Please consider the histroy of humanity from biological perpsecitve and current known fact in nearby universe, which expo-planet (from the Sol system perspective) is most likely to have civlizaed society? Please add percentage next to it in the chart

ChatGPT

Reasoned about exoplanet civilization likelihoodを28 秒行う

Evaluating planetary prospects

OK, I’m looking at the likelihood of a civilized society on an exoplanet within our Solar System. I’ll consider biological history and current space knowledge, aiming to identify the most promising candidate.

Identifying potential candidates

I'm considering exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from our Solar System.

Assessing potential candidates

I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard's Star, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1, focusing on their habitable zones and available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilized society likelihoods.

Identifying promising exoplanets

I’m noting key exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which have Earth-like characteristics and are in habitable zones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advanced civilizations.

Assessing habitable zones

I'm gathering info on planets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, considering factors like magnetic fields, atmospheres, and proximity to G-type stars for their potential to support advanced civilizations.

Evaluating exoplanet prospects

I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despite being close and around a red dwarf star, might support life if it has a magnetic field and atmosphere. This makes me think about its potential.

Charting probabilities

I'm estimating civilization probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculative percentages based on the Drake equation and the lack of evidence for intelligent life.

Charting speculative odds

I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names and civilization likelihood percentages, grounded in the long timeline of life's evolution, despite the speculative nature of these figures.

Identifying exoplanet contenders

I’m evaluating exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering their star types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advanced civilizations from our solar system's viewpoint.

Weighing proximity and observation

I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due to its closeness and observational potential, despite concerns about its flare star dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.

Revisiting exoplanet options

I'm focusing on exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, and K2-18b, aiming to chart their likelihood of hosting a civilized society based on current knowledge.

Assessing exoplanet potentials

I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society.

Refining speculative probabilities

I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society, considering Earth's long biological history.

Refining odds

I'm considering the astronomical timeline for intelligent life on Earth, leading me to assign even lower speculative odds for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.

Clarifying speculative nature

I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrary percentages, clearly noting the speculative nature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience's basic understanding of the topic.

Mapping out speculative odds

I’m charting arbitrary percentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculative nature, and ensuring the data is accessible for young audiences with minimal scientific detail.

Crafting a chart

I’m creating a markdown table with speculative percentages for the likelihood of civilized life on exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoretical nature and considering the understanding level of an 8-year-old.

Integrating speculative analysis

I’m mapping out a markdown chart with speculative percentages for the likelihood of a civilized society on exoplanets, mindful of the complexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.

Assessing likelihoods

I’m piecing together markdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b's reduced civilized life chance due to the red dwarf's activity. This inclusion highlights the speculative nature of the analysis.

Piecing together speculative odds

I’m detailing a markdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanet likelihoods, considering environmental challenges and adding a disclaimer about the speculative nature and lack of evidence.

Piecing together

I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b for its proximity and silent star, but I’ll add a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advanced civilizations' hypothetical likelihood.

Assessing civilization probabilities

I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligent life on Earth, which suggests that the odds of any habitable planet developing a complex civilization might be as low as a few percent.

Below is a very speculative chart that—based on what we know about Earth’s long, winding path from simple life to a “civilized society” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives some fun, made‑up percentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists have not yet found any proof of life (let alone advanced civilizations) on any exoplanet. These numbers are just playful estimates to help you think about the ideas!

Speculative Chances of Finding an Advanced Civilization on Nearby Exoplanets

Exoplanet Estimated Likelihood of a Civilized Society

Proxima Centauri b ~2%

TRAPPIST-1 e ~1.5%

TRAPPIST-1 f ~1%

TRAPPIST-1 g ~1%

LHS 1140 b ~0.5%

How Did We (Very Roughly) Guess These Numbers?

Earth’s Example:

On Earth, life began as simple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that built complex societies. This long journey suggests that—even if a planet is in the “habitable zone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilized society might be rare.

Nearby Exoplanets:

Proxima Centauri b:

This is the closest exoplanet to us. Even though its star (Proxima Centauri) is a red dwarf that sometimes sends out strong flares (which might harm life), its closeness makes it one of our most interesting candidates. That’s why we give it a slightly higher guess (~2%).

TRAPPIST-1 System (e, f, g):

These planets are part of a group orbiting a very cool star. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaning one side always faces the star), so the chance of a complex, advanced civilization might be a bit lower.

LHS 1140 b:

This planet is promising in some ways but is a little farther away and around a dimmer star, so our playful estimate is even lower.

A Final Note

All of these percentages are extremely rough guesses based on what little we understand about the conditions for life and intelligence. Scientists use ideas like the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concrete evidence, these numbers remain just for fun and imagination.

Enjoy exploring these ideas—and remember, space is full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!

あなた:

Please examine the Drake Equation itself and see if this euqation is acculate or more opition in the equation you will use

ChatGPT

Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う

re-examining the Drake Equation

evaluating the Drake Equation's value

Clarifying the Drake Equation

OK, let me see. The Drake Equation isn't a precise formula; it's more of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrial civilizations.

Assessing the Drake Equation

Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluating its conceptual nature, its uncertain parameters, and its criticism to conclude on its reliability as an accurate predictive model.

Understanding the Drake Equation

I’m mapping out the Drake Equation as a conceptual guide, detailing its parameters, which are often based on estimates or opinions, to evaluate its reliability for predicting extraterrestrial civilizations.

The Drake Equation is a famous formula that was created to help scientists think about the many factors involved in estimating the number of detectable extraterrestrial civilizations in our galaxy. However, when we look at the equation closely, we see that it is more of a conceptual framework or heuristic tool than a precise, predictive formula. Let’s break down why:

The Drake Equation

The equation is usually written as:

𝑁

=

𝑅

∗

×

𝑓

𝑝

×

𝑛

𝑒

×

𝑓

𝑙

×

𝑓

𝑖

×

𝑓

𝑐

×

𝐿

N=R

∗

×f

p

​

×n

e

​

×f

l

​

×f

i

​

×f

c

​

×L

Where:

𝑅

∗

R

∗

: The average rate of star formation per year in our galaxy.

𝑓

𝑝

f

p

​

: The fraction of those stars that have planetary systems.

𝑛

𝑒

n

e

​

: The average number of planets that could potentially support life per star with planets.

𝑓

𝑙

f

l

​

: The fraction of those planets where life actually develops.

𝑓

𝑖

f

i

​

: The fraction of planets with life where intelligent life evolves.

𝑓

𝑐

f

c

​

: The fraction of civilizations that develop technology that releases detectable signals into space.

𝐿

L: The length of time such civilizations release detectable signals.

Why the Drake Equation Is More of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula

Uncertain Inputs:

Well-Known Parameters:

Some factors, like

𝑅

∗

R

∗

(star formation rate) and

𝑓

𝑝

f

p

​

(fraction of stars with planets), have become better known through modern astronomy.

Highly Speculative Factors:

The parameters related to the development of life and intelligence—

𝑓

𝑙

f

l

​

,

𝑓

𝑖

f

i

​

,

𝑓

𝑐

f

c

​

, and

𝐿

L—are based on very limited data. For example, Earth is the only planet we know where life has developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for these factors. This means that the values chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.

Wide Ranges of Possible Values:

Because many of these factors are not well-constrained, if you change one of the more uncertain parameters even slightly, the final estimate for

𝑁

N (the number of civilizations) can vary by many orders of magnitude. This wide range shows that the equation can lead to very different outcomes based on personal or theoretical assumptions.

Heuristic, Not Predictive:

The Drake Equation was never meant to provide a precise answer. Instead, it serves as a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrial civilizations. It encourages discussion about the relative importance of different factors and highlights where our scientific knowledge is limited.

Is the Drake Equation Accurate or More Opinion-Based?

Accurate?

In the sense of being a strict mathematical model with well-defined inputs and predictable outputs, the Drake Equation is not accurate. Its accuracy is limited by the extreme uncertainties in several of its key parameters.

Opinion-Based?

Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning the evolution of life and intelligence, are based on opinion, interpretation, and the single example of Earth. Therefore, while the structure of the equation is logical, the numbers you put into it (and hence the final result) are often more reflective of our current opinions and assumptions than of robust empirical data.

Conclusion

The Drake Equation is a valuable tool for framing the question of extraterrestrial life. It helps scientists and enthusiasts break down a complex problem into smaller, more manageable questions. However, because several of its factors are highly uncertain and subject to personal interpretation, it is more of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of the number of extraterrestrial civilizations.

In summary, while the Drake Equation is useful for thinking about the various factors that might lead to the emergence of a civilization, its outputs should be taken as highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.

あなた:

Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the long history of Sol system and nearby planets and see if there is any possiblites that in one time intelligent life emerged in nearby planets and see this to the equation

ChatGPT

Reasoned about non-human intelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う

Evaluating non-human intelligence

I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligent life forms in the Sol system and neighboring planets, and how this might factor into the equation.

Piecing together possibilities

I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligent life, possibly on Mars or Europa, into the Drake Equation for the Sol system and neighboring planets.

Reflecting on potential

It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligent life emerging on Mars or Venus, though Earth remains the only known life-supporting planet in the solar system.

Considering other realms

I'm examining if intelligent life could have emerged on planets like Mars, Venus, or Europa, and how this possibility aligns with the predictions of the Drake Equation.

Analyzing parallel evolution

Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligent life on Mars or Venus could intersect with the assumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems to focus solely on Earth-based evolution.

Evaluating life exploration

I’m piecing together the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligent life in the solar system. Mars, Venus, and Titan present challenges, but Europa and Enceladus might harbor microbial life.

Adapting the equ Permalink | 記事への反応(0) | 21:12

ツイートシェア

■anond:20250201184257

inclusiveは「（我々が認めたものを）まとめて」だからな

ハナからアウトオブ眼中よ

Permalink | 記事への反応(0) | 18:53

ツイートシェア

■anond:20240824195712

有識者っぽい人の一言解説 / X

• 太田洋@SPEC(@yota1967)

https://x.com/yota1967/status/1826484158782115905

これは恐らく単純な未実現利益への課税案ではなくて、米民主党がバイデン政権下で法案出してるULTRA方式による課税で、資産に課税当局が仮想の無議決権のエクィティ持分を付与し、資産売却時にその持分から税を徴収する仕組みです。アメリカはめっちゃ頭いい人がいます。租税研究7月号に紹介書きました

情報ソースに近そうなもの

• Kamala Harris backs Biden’s tax proposals — including a tax on unrealized capital gains / MarketWatch

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/kamala-harris-backs-bidens-tax-proposals-including-a-tax-on-unrealized-capital-gains-66c55df2

Biden’s Treasury Department said it’s proposing “a minimum tax of 25 percent on total income, generally inclusive of unrealized capital gains, for all taxpayers with wealth (that is, the difference obtained by subtracting liabilities from assets) greater than $100 million.”

日本語の報道 / COINPOST

• ハリス氏の経済政策に警戒感　史上最高の「富裕税」と法人税率引き上げを提案

https://coinpost.jp/?p=552986

1億ドル（145億円）以上の資産を持つ富裕層に対しては、換金されていない投資の含み益に対しても、キャピタルゲインとして25％の税を課す提案がなされている。

Permalink | 記事への反応(0) | 14:14

ツイートシェア

■anond:20240731211203

The topic of Boys' Love (BL) and its community can be a sensitive and complex subject, with varying opinions and feelings among individuals. It's important to approach such discussions with respect and understanding for different perspectives.

Boys' Love, also known as Yaoi, is a genre of fictional media that focuses on romantic and/or sexual relationships between male characters. It originated in Japan and has gained a diverse international audience. The genre encompasses a wide range of works, including manga, anime, novels, and fan-created content, often produced by and for women but enjoyed by a broader audience.

The BL community is known for its passionate fanbase, which actively engages in creating and sharing fan works, such as fan fiction and fan art. This creative expression is a testament to the impact of the genre on its fans and the ways in which it inspires them to explore complex themes of love, identity, and society.

However, as with any fandom, there can be aspects that some individuals find uncomfortable or problematic. It's crucial for communities to foster an environment where constructive criticism and open dialogue can occur, allowing for growth and understanding. Discussions about content, representation, and fan practices should be inclusive and considerate, acknowledging the diverse range of feelings and viewpoints within the community.

In conclusion, the BL genre and its community contribute significantly to the landscape of modern media and fan culture. While there may be elements that are contentious or evoke strong reactions, it's the shared passion for storytelling and character exploration that unites fans. As the genre continues to evolve, it will undoubtedly continue to spark discussions and inspire creativity among its audience.

For those interested in learning more about the genre and its cultural impact, there are numerous resources and scholarly works available that delve into the history, themes, and significance of Boys' Love in both Japanese and global contexts. Exploring these can provide a deeper understanding of the genre and its community.

Permalink | 記事への反応(2) | 21:17

ツイートシェア

■https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20240614205200 タグ付けソースつづき

文字数制限かなんかで途中で切れる……

■https://anond.hatelabo.jp/20240614204953 の勝手にタグ付けソースだよ

■トランスアライも何でJKローリングが差別主義者扱いされているのかわからないのでは

トランスヘイターの希望の星JKRは「女性は月経のある人」って言ったよね。

あれ、女性じゃなく「メス」呼ばわりな。

https://twitter.com/DARKSIDE_ghost9/status/1744703682959315038?t=ElAG70W4x0hr8SeS3DUcgA&s=19

あの手の人等は「月経のある人だけが女性なのだ」とか凄まじいことを言ってるJKローリングを賛美してるのに、男が似たようなことを言うと発狂するのが面白いよね。

https://twitter.com/_sushiy/status/1787162061325091304?t=6hLR5tP1u-Tn45U1jWNDXQ&s=19

上のようにJKローリングの発言を真逆に拡散するトランスアライをよく見る。

実際はトランスアライが女を月経の有る人と呼び、それに「”月経がある人”。昔はこの人たちを指す言葉があったはず。誰か教えて。ウンベン？　ウィンパンド？　ウーマッド？」

「もし性別がないのであれば同性に惹かれることもなくなるし、今世界中にいる女性たちの現実が失われてしまう。私にはトランスジェンダーの知り合いもいるし愛しているけれど、性という概念を消してしまったら人生について意義のある話し合いをする力も失われてしまう。真実を話すのはヘイトスピーチではない」とツイートした為に性犯罪予告や殺害予告も大量に来るほどに大炎上し、JKローリングはここから差別主義者のレッテルを貼られて激しい攻撃に晒された。

https://twitter.com/jk_rowling/status/1269382518362509313?t=Id4ssgaXCU66YoxrnvkUhA&s=19

https://www.elle.com/jp/culture/celebgossip/a32804188/jk-rowling-200609/

これに問題のある発言とは思えないと言ったハグリッド役の俳優も差別主義者のレッテルを貼られ、亡くなったときはトランス界隈から地獄に落ちろと大喜びされていた程に、この発言へ向けられた憎悪は凄まじい。

"'Woman' is not a costume.

'Woman' is not an idea in a man's head.

The 'inclusive' language that calls female people 'menstruators' and 'people with vulvas' strikes many women as dehumanising and demeaning."

— JK Rowling

JKローリングは女性を月経の有る人や外陰部を持つ人と呼ぶ包括的な言葉は多くの女性にとって非人間的で屈辱的なものとして受け取られていると発言している。

なのにアライの多くが、真逆に思い込みトランスアライの包括的な発言をJKローリングの差別発言だと拡散しようとしている。

実際の所何故この発言で差別主義者のレッテルを貼ったのか、トランスアライも全く理解できていないのではないか。

Permalink | 記事への反応(2) | 01:26

ツイートシェア

■anond:20231208215354

変わったデバイス使って変わったことをする芸風でAIについてはあまり書いてないな。

せいぜいこれに応用してるくらいか。

"Text to Haptics: Method and Case Studies of Designing Tactile Graphics for Inclusive Tactile Picture Books by Digital Fabrication and Generative AI", ACM SIGGRAPH 2023 Labs

日本人から選ぶなら海外の一流どころで活躍してる若い人か大御所で良いのでは？

Permalink | 記事への反応(1) | 22:16

ツイートシェア

■まいじつの運営はINCLUSIVE株式会社と株式会社日本ジャーナル出版（週刊実話）

覚えておこうな

https://inclusive.co.jp/about-us/

https://nihonjournal.jp/

Permalink | 記事への反応(0) | 02:27

ツイートシェア

■Vt.小学校「男性」「女性」を「精子をつくる人」「卵子をつくる人」に

「精バー」と「卵サー」でいんじゃね長いし

・Vermont school removes ‘male,’ ‘female’ terms from reproductive system lessons

A Vermont elementary school says it will no longer use the words “male” or “female” when teaching fifth-grade students about puberty and human reproductive systems.

Families of students at Founders Memorial School received a letter on April 20 informing them of the changes to the science and health curriculum.

The changes reflect the district’s desire to use “gender inclusive language,” Principal Sara Jablonski wrote in the letter.

“In an effort to align our curriculum with our equity policy, teachers will be using gender inclusive language throughout this unit. With any differences, we strive to use ‘person-first’ language as best practice,” Jablonski wrote.

Instead of referring to a person as a “boy” or “male,” teachers will say “person who produces sperm.” Likewise, they will no longer say “girl” or “female” but “person who produces eggs.”

NEW YORK POST　April 26, 2023

Permalink | 記事への反応(0) | 17:01

ツイートシェア

■Twitterクビになった

Twitterではミーティングの時に希望する代名詞を言うことが礼儀になっています。「私の代名詞はhe/himですアジア人で黒の短髪、赤いTシャツを来てジーパンを履いています。」などと毎回言うのです。こうすることでinclusiveな職場を作ってきていました。メールの署名にも代名詞を必ず入れます。ただイーロンはこういうことが嫌いみたいですね。Inclusiveな行いをしていた人達はみんな解雇されてしまいました。心配です。

Permalink | 記事への反応(0) | 16:59

ツイートシェア

■GAFAMは人事評価にポリコレが組み込まれている

「Inclusiveな職場にしたか」ということが人事評価に組み込まれているので皆競って新たなポリコレマナーを生成していく。全く人種差別に関係ないのに突然blacklist/whitelistが差別用語になったりしたのはこのためですね。事実よりもパフォーマンスが大事なわけです。DEI program managerという専任のポジションの人がいて日本でいうマナー講師のようなことをするわけですね。

Permalink | 記事への反応(1) | 13:14

ツイートシェア

■

実態を何も変えず、ただ言葉狩りすることで解決したこととするってパティーン始まった

Inclusive language plays a critical role in fostering an environment where everyone belongs. At Twitter, the language we have been using in our code does not reflect our values as a company or represent the people we serve. We want to change that.

Permalink | 記事への反応(0) | 06:01