  |
はてなキーワード: Frameworkとは
カタログめくって(Webページググりまくって)、良さげな(業務経歴書にかけそうな)新しいサービスなりプロダクトなりを見つけたら、鼻を膨らませて得意げにメンバーに報告し、ポチる(リポジトリに組み込む)エンジニアを……、
と、名付けたよ。
経営者は「最新の情報に敏感」「技術に詳しい」とか評価するようだけど、カタログひっくり返しては「あれはいい」「この新製品はすごい！」「これ最高！」って喋りまくる人間が、どれほど軽薄で浅はかかわからんのだろうか？
わからんのだろうな。
ミーハーに「AI最高！ これでお金集めてガッポガッポ！！」みたいな経営者じゃ。
ADRと称して導入企業名と諸元の比較ばかりして、一番デカくて高価なのが正義、くらいしか語れないのを、エンジニアと？ w
それはただの消費者だ。
って言うと、「お前が新しいサービスについていけてないだけじゃねーのか」って陰口を叩かれるんだが、新サービスのチェックした上で、煽り文句を真に受けて「一秒でも早く使ってみたい」という、単細胞的な反応をしないだけだ。
出自はどこか？
等々、広告記事以外の情報を集めて検討し、「今目の前にあるプロダクトに使えるか？」考えた上で、余計で巨大なフジツボをくっつけるだけなら触る価値もない、と判断しとるだけだ。
いくつもプロダクト名を列記したくてうずうずするが、どう考えても業務妨害になるから、できない。
そもそも、待ち望んでいたサービスやプロダクトなら、.netFrameworkもLambdaもEMR(Spark)も使えるようになったらすぐに採用するように説得してきたし、新サービスのSnowflakeをぜひ使いたいというのを、処理の特性と、プロダクトの設計等々を理由に止めてAthenaを採用して、1リクエストあたりリアルタイム処理は1、2秒レスポンスタイプが伸びたが、事前準備可能なリクエスト、再度リクエストであれば即時レスポンス、その処理部分にかかる利用料金を1/100にした。
利用プロダクトの選定は、普段から情報収集しているから、ほとんどかからん。
初回リリースには、肌感覚だがそこら辺の現場の1.2倍くらいの実時間がかかる。
けど、人月では8〜9割くらいで済んでいる。
で、初回リリース後、追加開発が重なれば重なるほど、そこら辺の開発の2割引くらいの人時間金で済むし、安定度も高い。
それができる仕組みを、初回リリース時にほぼ揃え切ってしまうから。
そう言う準備設計こそ、プロダクトと会社の健康余命を伸ばす秘訣だ。
もし夏目漱石が、プログラミングの主要概念を自ら日本語に翻訳していたら――と仮定すると、彼の文体や明治期の言葉遣い、漢語の選好を踏まえて、以下のような趣になると考えられます。
| 英語 | 漱石風の訳語案 | 理由・解説 |
| Variable | 変数（へんすう）／移り数 | 「変数」はすでに定着語だが、漱石なら「移り数」など文学的な情緒を帯びた訳もあり得る。変化の宿る数という意味を直訳的かつ風雅に表現。 |
| Function | 作用式／用法 | 明治期の数学や化学で「作用」はよく用いられた。漱石は日常語よりも漢語を好んだ傾向があり、「式」を付して理知的に。 |
| Class | 類型／階（きざはし） | 「クラス」を単なる「類」とせず、階層や格式を想起させる「階」を用い、文学的響きを加える。 |
| Object | 物象（ぶっしょう）／客体 | 漱石は哲学用語に通じており、ドイツ哲学経由の「客体」や漢詩文的「物象」を好みそう。 |
| Instance | 事例／具現 | 具体化の意味を強調し、「具現」というやや詩的な言い回しを採用する可能性。 |
| Loop | 環（わ）／巡り | 「ループ」は漢語にすれば「環」だが、漱石は擬人的に「巡り」として表すかもしれない。 |
| Array | 配列／ならび | 技術的な「配列」もあるが、漱石なら柔らかな響きの「ならび」も好みそう。 |
| Thread | 糸筋／綴り筋 | 並行処理のスレッドを、文学的に糸や文章にたとえ、「綴り筋」と表現。 |
| Exception | 異例／破格事 | 法や規範から外れるニュアンスを重んじ、「破格事」と漢詩的に。 |
| Debug | 虫退治／瑕（きず）探し | 「バグ」を虫にたとえてそのまま「虫退治」とするのは洒落が効く。漱石らしいユーモアが入り得る部分。 |
| Compile | 編纂（へんさん）／綴（と）じ合せ | 書物の編集に通じる語を用い、文章を束ねるような比喩で。 |
| Execute | 遂行／実行 | 法律や行政文書に見られる硬質な「遂行」を選ぶ可能性が高い。 |
| Source code | 原文／本体文 | 漱石は文学者として「原文」という表現を好みそう。 |
| Syntax | 文法／詞組（ことばぐみ） | 言語構造を古風に「詞組」と表現すれば漱石節になる。 |
| Algorithm | 算法（さんぽう）／演算譜 | 明治期数学書の用語「算法」をそのまま採用しそう。 |
| Library | 書庫／集録 | 書物に通じるメタファーで表現。 |
| Framework | 骨組／枠組 | 漱石は建築や骨格にたとえて「骨組」を選びそう。 |
| Module | 節（ふし）／章片 | 文学的構造を想起させる語を選ぶかも。 |
| Boolean | 真偽値／是非数 | 真と偽を「是非」で置き換える古風な表現。 |
| Pointer | 指標／指し手 | 将棋や文学の語彙から「指し手」とする余地も。 |
少年漫画に登場する未成年キャラクターを対象とした成人女性によるBL二次創作は、児童保護、マイノリティ表象、著作権倫理の観点から重大な問題をはらむ文化的・法的搾取行為です。
国連「子どもの売買・児童ポルノ・児童買春に関する特別報告者」や欧州評議会のガイドラインでは、次のように指摘されています。
「仮想であっても、18歳未満と認識される登場人物に対する性的描写は、児童の性的搾取を助長する表現であり、社会的許容を生み出すリスクを伴う」
特に日本のように児童をモデルにしたアニメ・マンガの性的表象が多用される国については、文化的児童ポルノの存在が現実の児童虐待の温床になるとの国際的懸念が表明されています。
少年誌に登場するキャラクターの多くは未成年であり、これらが性的被虐的関係（いわゆる「受け」）で描かれる場合、その性的イメージは児童の性的イメージの再生産に他なりません。
これは児童福祉法の精神に反し、「性的同意能力のない者の性行為描写」を娯楽として消費する構造です。
タイトル・キャラクター名が一致しているため、検索すれば原作読者である少年層が成人向けBL二次創作に容易にアクセス可能です。
現実としてSNSでゾーニングが機能せず、少年読者が自分と同年齢のキャラの性描写に出会う危険性は高く、実際にそのような被害は発生しています。
少年がブックオフで知っているキャラクターの本を手に取ったら性的描写のどぎつい二次創作BLのアンソロジーコミックで、置かれているコーナーはR18ではない一般書コーナーだった、等のゾーニング失敗事例が現実でもネットでも起こっています。
原作において異性愛的関係性で描かれていた少年キャラが、「攻め・受け」のセックス記号として加工され、ゲイという性的マイノリティが「架空の性癖」として消費されている。
これは、実在するゲイ男性の人格・関係性・歴史的背景を剥奪し、快楽のための性的ステレオタイプとして記号化している。
少年BLにおいて描かれる「少年らしさ」や「ゲイ性」は、成人の異性愛女性にとって“性的に都合のよいもの”として設計されている。
これは、男性による女性の性的客体化（ポルノグラフィ）と構造的に同一であり、女性が「表現者」であってもその加害性は無効化されない。
原作の著作権者の中には、二次創作、とりわけ性的な二次創作に対して明確に拒否や違和感を表明している作家が複数います。
作品の意図やキャラ性を歪める改変は、「同一性保持権」の侵害にあたる場合があり、著作権法上も違法性が高い行為です。
日本の著作権法において、二次創作は著作権者の許諾なしでは原則として違法。
市場慣行上、暗黙の了解が存在する分野もありますが、性的表現や未成年キャラを対象とする場合は、「公序良俗違反」として権利者が訴えた場合、法的責任を問われる可能性が極めて高いです。
をすべて内包しており、倫理的・法的・社会的に持続可能な表現活動とはいえない。
創作の自由や性的ファンタジーの権利は、他者の尊厳・権利・現実に損害を与えない限度内で初めて正当化される。
自作PCを10年前ぐらいからやってて未だに疑問に思うんだけど、何で自作ノートPCが全然普及しないんだろ。
え、市販のノートPCとか、もしゲームもしたいならゲーミングノートPCとか買えば良いじゃん？って言うんだろうけど、
まあメモリやSSDは交換できるノートPCはあるけど、電源とかGPUは交換できるの無いじゃん。
それだと最新のゲームがやりたいがスペック不足…という場面で、買い替えせざるを得なくて出費大きいし勿体ないんだよ。
自作ノートPCがあれば電源とGPUを良い物に交換できるんだから、買い替えより安く済むじゃん。
一応、frameworkっていうカスタマイズ可能な自作ノートPCはあるっちゃあるけど、それぐらいしか選択肢が無い。しかも競争相手居ないからかめちゃくちゃ価格高めに設定されてて買う気失せる。
VitaにCFWを導入するにあたり、情報が散乱していたのでまとめる
・2022年末に革新的進歩があり、VITA単体でCFW導入できるようになった（通称 HENlo）
・にも関わらず古いCFW導入方法を案内しているブログが大量にある
・しかもタイトルの"20XX年最新"だけ更新し続けているから、最新記事に見える
↓
PC使用が前提になっているブログは全部古いので無視した方が良いです。
・『HENlo』について触れている
この2つが押さえられてれば最新情報です。（2025年5月現在）
ただし、現状だと実は『PC操作が一部必要』という罠があります。
その問題について書いている記事が見当たらないので、ここに残しておきます。
超具体的には
「HENkaku、VitaDeploy、VitaShellは導入できた」
「けどEnso導入ができない/つまづいている」 エラー：failed to get fw version please disable all the plugins and try again
5chでもRedditでも
『プラグインを無効にしろ』『0syscall6を無効にしろ』って書いてあったのですが、実はEnsoのバージョン変えれば解決します。（後述）
この記事が役に立ちました
[Vita] 2023年最新手順【HENlo】3.65-3.74 PC不要でCFW(HENkaku)導入
https://re-doing.com/vita-henlo-hack/
（一応魚拓：https://web.archive.org/web/20250226111105/https://re-doing.com/vita-henlo-hack/）
・HENkaku （カスタムファームウェア 3.65 変革 -2）
・VitaDeploy
・VitaShell
・最悪文鎮化する可能性があるのでセーブデータバックアップを取ったほうが良い
・VITAのセーブデータは特殊で、PCと繋ぐだけでは取り出せない
・バックアップにはいくつか方法があるが、PCのコンテンツ管理アシスタントは既に使えないと思ったほうが良い。PS Plusのクラウドバックアップが最も良いはず
・記事の内容を実施する前にバックアップ取るのを強くおすすめする
これをインストールすることで、電源を切ってからもCFW状態を維持できます。
VitaDeploy内のApp downloaderメニューからEnsoをインストールできますが、実はこのバージョンが古いです。※重要※
そのためVitaDeployからインストールすると先程のエラー（failed to get fw version please disable all the plugins and try again）が必ず出ます。
「PC不要になった」と書いてあったので盲点ですが、ここからPC必要です。
正しい方法は以下です
1, PC操作：GithubからEnso最新版のenso.vpkファイルをダウンロード（現在v1.1）
https://github.com/TheOfficialFloW/enso/releases
2, PCとVitaをUSBケーブルで繋げる ※データ転送対応ケーブルを使うこと。相性もある
5, PC操作：USBドライブとしてVITAのデータが表示されるので、ダウンロードしていたenso.vpkファイルを置く（フォルダはどこでもOK。自分はルート直下に置きました）
7, Vita操作：VitaShellでenso.vpkを見つける（さっきルートに置いたなら恐らくux0:にある）
9. Vita操作：Do you want to install this package? → ◯ボタン
10. Vita操作：~~~ Would you like to continue the install? ※意訳：「失敗したら文鎮化するけど自己責任だけど続ける？」 → ◯ボタン
11. 進行バーが消えたらインストール完了 ホーム画面に戻ってOK
Ensoはファームウェアが3.60か3.65じゃないとインストールできないです。（3.65 変革 -2は3.65扱い）
先程の記事の通り進めていたら3.65 変革 -2 になっているはずですが、実行前に再確認して下さい。
1, ~~~ Press CIRCLE to accept these terms or any other key to not accept. → ◯ボタンを押す（=CIRCLE ）
2, Options：
CROSS Install /reinstall the hack.
SQUARE Fix boot configuration (choose this if taiHEN isn't loading on boot).
CIRCLE Exit without doing anything.
Locking sustem ..
（中略）
The installation was completed successfully.
suocess.
MBR was detected but instllation checksum dose not match.
A dump was created at ux0:data/blocks.bin.
Press X to continue, any othe key to exit.
意訳：「ちょい待った。思ってた構成じゃないから危ないかもしれんわ。続ける？」
→✕ボタンを押す ※結局原因分かってないので自己責任でお願いします※
4, Locking sustem ..
（中略）
The installation was completed successfully.
suocess.
Enso導入が成功していると
・ファームウェアが3.65 変革 -2のままなっている
お疲れ様でした。
記事の本題は以上です。
VITAのセーブデータは暗号化されており、吸い出せてもエミュレータで使えないらしい。本体機体とセットで揃わないと使えない仕様。
調べたらセーブデータをここまでキツく縛ってるハードは他にない
だからメモリーカードのデータ管理でもPSPのセーブデータしか項目がなかったのか…
不便すぎる
当時の仮説
・HENkaku設定が悪さをしているのではないか（PSNの偽装を有効化、バージョンの偽装を有効化） →オフにしたが関係なかった
・本体にSD2VITAを刺しているのが良くないのではないか →抜いたが関係なかった
・enso.vpkの置き場所がルート（ux0:）が良くなかったのではないか →関係なかった
・VITAにメモリーカードを刺しているのが良くないのではないか →関係なかったが、データ保護的には抜くのが良さそう
・ゴミデータが残っていて悪さしているのではないか（手順を間違えたデータや古いデータなど） →関係ある可能性はある。最後までわからず
・Ensoのバージョンが古いのではないか →これが主要因だった
ゴミデータを疑った自分は正規のファームウェアに戻して、CFW化をやり直したりもした。
その際HENkakuすら入れられなくなってしまったので、抜け方を書いておく。
ENSO実行
↓
~~~ Press CIRCLE to accept these terms or any other key to not accept. → ◯ボタンを押す（=CIRCLE ）
↓
Options：
CROSS Install /reinstall the hack.
SQUARE Fix boot configuration (choose this if taiHEN isn't loading on boot).
CIRCLE Exit without doing anything.
→ △ボタンを押す（=TRIANGLE Uninstall the hack.）
↓
↓
↓
ファームウェアアップデートが促され、アップデートしないとメモリースティックが使えない
↓
↓
↓
HENloメニュー
・Exit
↓
「Eiting in 3」 の後に、以下のエラーメッセージがでて固まってしまう
vita starting taihen framework
If you are stuck on this screen, hold down the power button until your Vita turns off, then turn it back on.
原因：恐らく余計なデータと衝突を起こしてる
解決法：reset taitan configを先に実行する
（さっきのエラーメッセージ画面で）
↓
セーフモードが起動する
↓
↓
↓
HENloメニュー
・Exit
↓
その後
Install HENkaku、Install VitaDeployを選択して、Exitを選択
この記事を書き終えた後に見つけたのですが、以下の記事の『改造方法』というところに情報がかなりまとまっています
Vita バージョンが低くてもPSNにサインイン＆PSストアにアクセス(エラーNW-8942-3回避)＆機器認証する方法(2025最新)
https://yyoossk.blogspot.com/2024/10/vitapsnps2024.html
今回VITAのセーブデータバックアップが主目的だったから、徒労でしかなかった
指摘、補足、最新情報あれば反応もらえるとありがたいです
Speed, SEO, scalability, and developer productivity are more critical than ever. While React.js remains a powerhouse for building interactive user interfaces, many businesses and developers are now leaning toward Next.js for complete, production-ready solutions. So what exactly makes Next.js a more favorable choice over React.js in 2025? Let’s explore the reasons in detail.
🧱 React.js vs Next.js: Core Distinction
React.js is a JavaScript library focused solely on building UI components.
Next.js is a full-fledged framework built on top of React that includes everything you need for production — routing, SSR, SEO optimization, static site generation, and more.
In essence, React gives you the tools to build an interface, while Next.js gives you the structure to build, deploy, and scale a complete web application.
🚀 Key Advantages of Choosing Next.js in 2025
1. Built-in Server-Side Rendering (SSR)
2. Improved SEO Out of the Box
3. Hybrid Rendering Capabilities
5. Image & Font Optimization
This aligns perfectly with Google’s performance guidelines in 2025. React.js doesn’t offer this natively.
6. API Routes Without a Backend
7. Enhanced Developer Experience
Next.js has evolved into one of the most developer-friendly frameworks in 2025, backed by the Vercel ecosystem.In 2025, Next.js stands out as the smarter, faster, and more scalable solution for building modern websites and web applications. It inherits everything great about React — and adds structure, optimization, and production-readiness. If you’re planning to build a website that demands speed, SEO, and a seamless development process, Next.js is the clear choice.
For more details read this informative article: https://www.nimblechapps.com/blog/choosing-nextjs-over-reactjs-for-website-development
Please consider the histroy of humanity from biological perpsecitve and current known fact in nearby universe, which expo-planet (from the Sol system perspective) is most likely to have civlizaed society? Please add percentage next to it in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanet civilization likelihoodを28 秒行う
Evaluating planetary prospects
OK, I’m looking at the likelihood of a civilized society on an exoplanet within our Solar System. I’ll consider biological history and current space knowledge, aiming to identify the most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from our Solar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard's Star, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1, focusing on their habitable zones and available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilized society likelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m noting key exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which have Earth-like characteristics and are in habitable zones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advanced civilizations.
I'm gathering info on planets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, considering factors like magnetic fields, atmospheres, and proximity to G-type stars for their potential to support advanced civilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despite being close and around a red dwarf star, might support life if it has a magnetic field and atmosphere. This makes me think about its potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimating civilization probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculative percentages based on the Drake equation and the lack of evidence for intelligent life.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names and civilization likelihood percentages, grounded in the long timeline of life's evolution, despite the speculative nature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering their star types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advanced civilizations from our solar system's viewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due to its closeness and observational potential, despite concerns about its flare star dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'm focusing on exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, and K2-18b, aiming to chart their likelihood of hosting a civilized society based on current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society, considering Earth's long biological history.
Refining odds
I'm considering the astronomical timeline for intelligent life on Earth, leading me to assign even lower speculative odds for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrary percentages, clearly noting the speculative nature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience's basic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrary percentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculative nature, and ensuring the data is accessible for young audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating a markdown table with speculative percentages for the likelihood of civilized life on exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoretical nature and considering the understanding level of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mapping out a markdown chart with speculative percentages for the likelihood of a civilized society on exoplanets, mindful of the complexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecing together markdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b's reduced civilized life chance due to the red dwarf's activity. This inclusion highlights the speculative nature of the analysis.
Piecing together speculative odds
I’m detailing a markdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanet likelihoods, considering environmental challenges and adding a disclaimer about the speculative nature and lack of evidence.
Piecing together
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b for its proximity and silent star, but I’ll add a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advanced civilizations' hypothetical likelihood.
Assessing civilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligent life on Earth, which suggests that the odds of any habitable planet developing a complex civilization might be as low as a few percent.
Below is a very speculative chart that—based on what we know about Earth’s long, winding path from simple life to a “civilized society” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives some fun, made‑up percentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists have not yet found any proof of life (let alone advanced civilizations) on any exoplanet. These numbers are just playful estimates to help you think about the ideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an Advanced Civilization on Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet Estimated Likelihood of a Civilized Society
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
How Did We (Very Roughly) Guess These Numbers?
Earth’s Example:
On Earth, life began as simple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that built complex societies. This long journey suggests that—even if a planet is in the “habitable zone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilized society might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
This is the closest exoplanet to us. Even though its star (Proxima Centauri) is a red dwarf that sometimes sends out strong flares (which might harm life), its closeness makes it one of our most interesting candidates. That’s why we give it a slightly higher guess (~2%).
These planets are part of a group orbiting a very cool star. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaning one side always faces the star), so the chance of a complex, advanced civilization might be a bit lower.
LHS 1140 b:
This planet is promising in some ways but is a little farther away and around a dimmer star, so our playful estimate is even lower.
All of these percentages are extremely rough guesses based on what little we understand about the conditions for life and intelligence. Scientists use ideas like the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concrete evidence, these numbers remain just for fun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring these ideas—and remember, space is full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equation itself and see if this euqation is acculate or more opition in the equation you will use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation's value
OK, let me see. The Drake Equation isn't a precise formula; it's more of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrial civilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluating its conceptual nature, its uncertain parameters, and its criticism to conclude on its reliability as an accurate predictive model.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mapping out the Drake Equation as a conceptual guide, detailing its parameters, which are often based on estimates or opinions, to evaluate its reliability for predicting extraterrestrial civilizations.
The Drake Equation is a famous formula that was created to help scientists think about the many factors involved in estimating the number of detectable extraterrestrial civilizations in our galaxy. However, when we look at the equation closely, we see that it is more of a conceptual framework or heuristic tool than a precise, predictive formula. Let’s break down why:
The equation is usually written as:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The average rate of star formation per year in our galaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of those stars that have planetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The average number of planets that could potentially support life per star with planets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of those planets where life actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction of planets with life where intelligent life evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction of civilizations that develop technology that releases detectable signals into space.
𝐿
L: The length of time such civilizations release detectable signals.
Why the Drake Equation Is More of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction of stars with planets), have become better known through modern astronomy.
The parameters related to the development of life and intelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—are based on very limited data. For example, Earth is the only planet we know where life has developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for these factors. This means that the values chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of Possible Values:
Because many of these factors are not well-constrained, if you change one of the more uncertain parameters even slightly, the final estimate for
𝑁
N (the number of civilizations) can vary by many orders of magnitude. This wide range shows that the equation can lead to very different outcomes based on personal or theoretical assumptions.
The Drake Equation was never meant to provide a precise answer. Instead, it serves as a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrial civilizations. It encourages discussion about the relative importance of different factors and highlights where our scientific knowledge is limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate or More Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In the sense of being a strict mathematical model with well-defined inputs and predictable outputs, the Drake Equation is not accurate. Its accuracy is limited by the extreme uncertainties in several of its key parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning the evolution of life and intelligence, are based on opinion, interpretation, and the single example of Earth. Therefore, while the structure of the equation is logical, the numbers you put into it (and hence the final result) are often more reflective of our current opinions and assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equation is a valuable tool for framing the question of extraterrestrial life. It helps scientists and enthusiasts break down a complex problem into smaller, more manageable questions. However, because several of its factors are highly uncertain and subject to personal interpretation, it is more of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of the number of extraterrestrial civilizations.
In summary, while the Drake Equation is useful for thinking about the various factors that might lead to the emergence of a civilization, its outputs should be taken as highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the long history of Sol system and nearby planets and see if there is any possiblites that in one time intelligent life emerged in nearby planets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-human intelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-human intelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligent life forms in the Sol system and neighboring planets, and how this might factor into the equation.
Piecing together possibilities
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligent life, possibly on Mars or Europa, into the Drake Equation for the Sol system and neighboring planets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligent life emerging on Mars or Venus, though Earth remains the only known life-supporting planet in the solar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligent life could have emerged on planets like Mars, Venus, or Europa, and how this possibility aligns with the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligent life on Mars or Venus could intersect with the assumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems to focus solely on Earth-based evolution.
I’m piecing together the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligent life in the solar system. Mars, Venus, and Titan present challenges, but Europa and Enceladus might harbor microbial life.
Please consider the histroy of humanity from biological perpsecitve and current known fact in nearby universe, which expo-planet (from the Sol system perspective) is most likely to have civlizaed society? Please add percentage next to it in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanet civilization likelihoodを28 秒行う
Evaluating planetary prospects
OK, I’m looking at the likelihood of a civilized society on an exoplanet within our Solar System. I’ll consider biological history and current space knowledge, aiming to identify the most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from our Solar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard's Star, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1, focusing on their habitable zones and available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilized society likelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m noting key exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which have Earth-like characteristics and are in habitable zones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advanced civilizations.
I'm gathering info on planets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, considering factors like magnetic fields, atmospheres, and proximity to G-type stars for their potential to support advanced civilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despite being close and around a red dwarf star, might support life if it has a magnetic field and atmosphere. This makes me think about its potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimating civilization probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculative percentages based on the Drake equation and the lack of evidence for intelligent life.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names and civilization likelihood percentages, grounded in the long timeline of life's evolution, despite the speculative nature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering their star types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advanced civilizations from our solar system's viewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due to its closeness and observational potential, despite concerns about its flare star dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'm focusing on exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, and K2-18b, aiming to chart their likelihood of hosting a civilized society based on current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society, considering Earth's long biological history.
Refining odds
I'm considering the astronomical timeline for intelligent life on Earth, leading me to assign even lower speculative odds for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrary percentages, clearly noting the speculative nature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience's basic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrary percentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculative nature, and ensuring the data is accessible for young audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating a markdown table with speculative percentages for the likelihood of civilized life on exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoretical nature and considering the understanding level of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mapping out a markdown chart with speculative percentages for the likelihood of a civilized society on exoplanets, mindful of the complexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecing together markdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b's reduced civilized life chance due to the red dwarf's activity. This inclusion highlights the speculative nature of the analysis.
Piecing together speculative odds
I’m detailing a markdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanet likelihoods, considering environmental challenges and adding a disclaimer about the speculative nature and lack of evidence.
Piecing together
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b for its proximity and silent star, but I’ll add a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advanced civilizations' hypothetical likelihood.
Assessing civilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligent life on Earth, which suggests that the odds of any habitable planet developing a complex civilization might be as low as a few percent.
Below is a very speculative chart that—based on what we know about Earth’s long, winding path from simple life to a “civilized society” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives some fun, made‑up percentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists have not yet found any proof of life (let alone advanced civilizations) on any exoplanet. These numbers are just playful estimates to help you think about the ideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an Advanced Civilization on Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet Estimated Likelihood of a Civilized Society
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
How Did We (Very Roughly) Guess These Numbers?
Earth’s Example:
On Earth, life began as simple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that built complex societies. This long journey suggests that—even if a planet is in the “habitable zone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilized society might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
This is the closest exoplanet to us. Even though its star (Proxima Centauri) is a red dwarf that sometimes sends out strong flares (which might harm life), its closeness makes it one of our most interesting candidates. That’s why we give it a slightly higher guess (~2%).
These planets are part of a group orbiting a very cool star. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaning one side always faces the star), so the chance of a complex, advanced civilization might be a bit lower.
LHS 1140 b:
This planet is promising in some ways but is a little farther away and around a dimmer star, so our playful estimate is even lower.
All of these percentages are extremely rough guesses based on what little we understand about the conditions for life and intelligence. Scientists use ideas like the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concrete evidence, these numbers remain just for fun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring these ideas—and remember, space is full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equation itself and see if this euqation is acculate or more opition in the equation you will use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation's value
OK, let me see. The Drake Equation isn't a precise formula; it's more of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrial civilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluating its conceptual nature, its uncertain parameters, and its criticism to conclude on its reliability as an accurate predictive model.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mapping out the Drake Equation as a conceptual guide, detailing its parameters, which are often based on estimates or opinions, to evaluate its reliability for predicting extraterrestrial civilizations.
The Drake Equation is a famous formula that was created to help scientists think about the many factors involved in estimating the number of detectable extraterrestrial civilizations in our galaxy. However, when we look at the equation closely, we see that it is more of a conceptual framework or heuristic tool than a precise, predictive formula. Let’s break down why:
The equation is usually written as:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The average rate of star formation per year in our galaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of those stars that have planetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The average number of planets that could potentially support life per star with planets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of those planets where life actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction of planets with life where intelligent life evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction of civilizations that develop technology that releases detectable signals into space.
𝐿
L: The length of time such civilizations release detectable signals.
Why the Drake Equation Is More of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction of stars with planets), have become better known through modern astronomy.
The parameters related to the development of life and intelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—are based on very limited data. For example, Earth is the only planet we know where life has developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for these factors. This means that the values chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of Possible Values:
Because many of these factors are not well-constrained, if you change one of the more uncertain parameters even slightly, the final estimate for
𝑁
N (the number of civilizations) can vary by many orders of magnitude. This wide range shows that the equation can lead to very different outcomes based on personal or theoretical assumptions.
The Drake Equation was never meant to provide a precise answer. Instead, it serves as a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrial civilizations. It encourages discussion about the relative importance of different factors and highlights where our scientific knowledge is limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate or More Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In the sense of being a strict mathematical model with well-defined inputs and predictable outputs, the Drake Equation is not accurate. Its accuracy is limited by the extreme uncertainties in several of its key parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning the evolution of life and intelligence, are based on opinion, interpretation, and the single example of Earth. Therefore, while the structure of the equation is logical, the numbers you put into it (and hence the final result) are often more reflective of our current opinions and assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equation is a valuable tool for framing the question of extraterrestrial life. It helps scientists and enthusiasts break down a complex problem into smaller, more manageable questions. However, because several of its factors are highly uncertain and subject to personal interpretation, it is more of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of the number of extraterrestrial civilizations.
In summary, while the Drake Equation is useful for thinking about the various factors that might lead to the emergence of a civilization, its outputs should be taken as highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the long history of Sol system and nearby planets and see if there is any possiblites that in one time intelligent life emerged in nearby planets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-human intelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-human intelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligent life forms in the Sol system and neighboring planets, and how this might factor into the equation.
Piecing together possibilities
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligent life, possibly on Mars or Europa, into the Drake Equation for the Sol system and neighboring planets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligent life emerging on Mars or Venus, though Earth remains the only known life-supporting planet in the solar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligent life could have emerged on planets like Mars, Venus, or Europa, and how this possibility aligns with the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligent life on Mars or Venus could intersect with the assumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems to focus solely on Earth-based evolution.
I’m piecing together the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligent life in the solar system. Mars, Venus, and Titan present challenges, but Europa and Enceladus might harbor microbial life.
In the labyrinthine realm of digital content dissemination, an enigmatic phenomenon has surfaced, challenging our axioms regarding the nexus between content ubiquity and viewer cognitive acumen. This disquisition endeavors to elucidate the paradoxical inverse correlation between video viewership metrics and the intellectual quotient of the audience, propounding that audiovisual content amassing prodigious view counts tends to captivate viewers with a mean Intelligence Quotient (IQ) of 100, while their more esoteric counterparts allure a demographic boasting an average IQ of 120.
To fathom this counterintuitive paradigm, one must first grapple with the multifarious nature of human cognition and the intricate interplay between intellectual capacity and media predilections. This hypothesis, positing an inverse relationship between a video's popularity and the mean IQ of its viewership, necessitates a rigorous examination of the underlying psycho-sociological and neurocognitive factors that may engender such a paradoxical outcome.
The application of Cognitive Load Theory to media consumption habits provides a plausible explication for this phenomenon. Videos achieving viral status often employ reductionist narratives and readily assimilable information, minimizing cognitive strain. Conversely, less ubiquitous videos may delve into more abstruse subject matter, demanding heightened cognitive engagement and a more sophisticated intellectual framework for comprehensive assimilation.
The pervasive influence of recommendation algorithms in content distribution platforms cannot be discounted in this analysis. These algorithmic arbiters, designed to maximize user engagement, may inadvertently engender epistemic bubbles that reinforce existing cognitive predispositions. Individuals with superior IQs may actively seek out more intellectually challenging or esoteric content, thereby circumventing the algorithmic propensity towards homogenization and cognitive stasis.
It is imperative to consider the socioeconomic dimensions that may influence both IQ development and media consumption patterns. Higher IQ individuals often correlate with elevated socioeconomic status, potentially affording them greater access to diverse epistemological resources and fostering a predilection for more intellectually stimulating content. This demographic may be less susceptible to the allure of mainstream, highly-viewed videos that cater to a broader, less discerning audience.
The ramifications of this inverse relationship between viewership and viewer IQ are profound for content creators and platform developers alike. It challenges the prevailing paradigm that equates popularity with quality or intellectual value. Content creators targeting a more intellectually discerning audience may need to recalibrate their expectations regarding view counts and engagement metrics, focusing instead on cultivating a dedicated niche audience that values cognitive stimulation over mass appeal.
In summation, the observed dichotomy between high-viewership videos attracting an audience with an average IQ of 100 and their less popular counterparts appealing to viewers with a mean IQ of 120 underscores the complex relationship between intellectual capacity and media consumption in the digital age. This phenomenon necessitates a reevaluation of how we measure content value and success in the online sphere, prompting a more nuanced approach to content creation, curation, and consumption that acknowledges the diverse cognitive needs of the audience spectrum. The implications of this paradigm shift extend far beyond mere metrics, touching upon fundamental questions of epistemology, cognitive diversity, and the very nature of intellectual engagement in the digital era.
The Hatena Anonymous Diary, while undeniably a distinctive fixture within the tapestry of Japanese internet culture, has garnered substantial criticism for its content and the implications of its operational framework. This discourse aims to elucidate the reasons underpinning its characterization as "problematic."
At the crux of the Hatena Anonymous Diary's appeal lies its hallmark feature: anonymity. This veil of secrecy ostensibly facilitates unrestrained discourse, allowing individuals to articulate their thoughts without fear of retribution. However, this very anonymity engenders a paradoxical effect; it cultivates an environment ripe for irresponsible commentary and vitriolic defamation. The absence of accountability diminishes the sense of responsibility that typically accompanies public expression, resulting in a proliferation of emotionally charged diatribes and baseless assertions. Such dynamics render the establishment of constructive dialogue increasingly elusive, thereby stifling meaningful engagement.
Moreover, the content disseminated through the Hatena Anonymous Diary frequently exhibits a disconcerting superficiality. Many entries lack substantive depth, failing to provide rigorous analysis or innovative perspectives. Instead, they often succumb to the allure of trending topics or sensationalism, prioritizing ephemeral relevance over intellectual rigor. This trend not only undermines the potential for serious discourse but also contributes to a culture where shallow engagement with complex issues prevails. In an era marked by information saturation, this deficiency in content quality is particularly egregious, as it detracts from the cultivation of critical thinking and informed debate.
Additionally, the cultural ramifications of this platform warrant scrutiny. By amplifying certain dominant narratives or viewpoints, there exists a palpable risk of eroding diversity within public discourse. The emergence of "groupthink" within specific communities can lead to the marginalization of dissenting voices, creating an echo chamber that stifles pluralism. In such an insular environment, diverse perspectives are systematically excluded, resulting in a homogenized narrative that fails to reflect the complexities of societal discourse. This phenomenon not only undermines individual expression but also poses significant risks to the overall health of democratic dialogue.
In conclusion, while the Hatena Anonymous Diary ostensibly champions free expression through its anonymous framework, it simultaneously fosters a milieu characterized by irresponsibility and superficiality. The cultural influence wielded by this platform raises critical concerns regarding its impact on diversity and social responsibility. Thus, characterizing it as "problematic" is not merely an exaggeration; it is an imperative recognition of its shortcomings. Moving forward, it is essential to scrutinize how this platform might evolve and address these inherent flaws in order to foster a more enriching and responsible discourse.
In the ever-evolving travel industry, travel portal have become fundamental tools for businesses looking to enhance customer experience It's streamline operations. With traveler increasingly relying on digital platforms to book everything from flights to hotels, the need for sophisticated, user-friendly, It's high-performing travel portals has never been more crucial. The growth of this sector is driven by numerous factors, including technological advancements, consumer behavior shifts, It's the quest for organization. This article explores the top trends in travel portals development that every business should pay attention to in 2024 It's beyond.
1. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Travel Portal Development
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) have quickly become foundational components of travel portal development. These technologies are revolutionizing the way businesses personalize services, predict consumer behavior, and optimize booking processes. AI and ML algorithms analyze large data sets to understand customers preferences, allowing for real-time customization of travel recommendations. From dynamic pricing models to
customized travel suggestions, AI help businesses offer an unequaled user experience.
For instance, AI chatbots are becoming successively popular for customer service. They can answer customer queries 24/7, assist in bookings, It's even provide real-time travel updates, enhancing the overall customers experience. Furthermore, AI-powered tools such as a recommendation engines analyze past booking behavior to suggest tailored itineraries, making travel planning much easier for user.
2. Mobile-First Approach for Travel Portal Development
With the increasing use of smartphones, as a mobile first approach is no longer optional for businesses in the travel industry. More It's more travelers are relying on their smartphones for booking flights, boardinghouse, It's activities on the go. For travel portals to stay competitive, ensuring seamless mobile optimization is crucial.
A mobile optimized travel portal ensures that users have access to the same features and functionalities on their mobile devices as they would on a desktop. It’s not just about making the site responsive—it’s about creating an intuitive, fast, and easy to navigate experience. This includes features like mobile-specific payment options, mobile check-in for airlines It's hotels, It's easy access to customers support.
3. Integration of Blockchain for Secure Transactions
Blockchain technology is making waves across various industries, and the travel sector is no exception. Blockchain based travel portals offer a significant advantage when it comes to security It's transparency. Blockchain’s ability to provide secure, tamper proof record makes it ideal for transactions involving bookings, payment, It's loyalty program.
By integrating blockchain, travel businesses can ensure secure It's fast transactions, protect customer data, It's reduce fraud. Blockchain also facilitates easier It's more transparent loyalty program management. Travelers can accumulate rewards points across various service providers, all within the same blockchain framework, creating as a more cohesive It's rewarding experience.
4. Enhanced Payment Solutions and Digital Wallets
One of the most significant changes in the travel industry has been the shift toward contactless payment. Digital wallets, such as a Apple Pay, Google Wallet, It's cryptocurrency wallets, are now widely accepted in travel portals. These payment solutions offer a faster, more secure, It's convenient way for travelers to complete transactions.
For businesses, adopting multiple payment gateways is essential for attracting global customer. International traveler can face issues with currency exchange It's transaction fees, but by offering localized payment method It's supporting a wide range of digital wallets, businesses can significantly improve customers satisfaction It's retention.
5. Voice Search and Virtual Assistants
Voice search is one of the fastest growing trends in the tech world, and the travel industry is no exception. Voice search optimization is becoming an essential part of travel portal development. With the rise of virtual assistants like Amazon’s Alexa, Google Assistant, It's Apple’s Siri, travelers are increasingly using voice command to search for flights, hotels, It's destinations.
For businesses, this means optimizing travel portals for voice search. Voice-friendly portal with natural language processing capabilities can provide users with more accurate results It's make booking processes quicker It's easier. Additionally, integrating virtual assistants into portals can enhance customers service by answering common queries It's assisting with bookings.
6. Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR) Experiences
(AR) and (VR) technologies are transforming the way travelers experience destinations and plan their trips. Intensified Reality allows traveler to view destinations, hotel, or local attractions in real time through their mobile devices. For example, an AR feature in a travel portal could allow user to take a virtual tour of a hotel room or explore a city’s landmarks in 3D.
Virtual Reality, on the other hand, can transport users to a destination before they even book their trip, providing immersive previews of their potential vacation. Integrating (AR) It's (VR) into travel portal not only elevates the user experience but also drives engagement by offering something truly unique.
7. Customizable and Personalized Travel Packages
Personalization is key to standing out in the competitive travel industry. Travelers today expect customizable travel packages that cater to their unique need and preferences. From flight choices to hotel rooms, activities, It's local experiences, organization allows businesses to create tailored experiences that resonate with their customer.
Advanced travel portal use customer data to offer customized deal, travel itineraries, It's destination recommendations. By analyzing past booking behaviors It's preferences, businesses can deliver highly relevant options, thus increasing the likelihood of conversion. Offering dynamic packaging allows users to mix and match services based on their preferences, creating a more flexible It's customized booking experience.
8. Sustainability and Eco-Friendly Travel Options
As a coincidental concerns continue to rise, more travelers are becoming mindful of their carbon footprint. Sustainable travel has become a major trend in the tourism industry, It's businesses are responding by incorporating Eco-friendly options into their travel portal. Whether it’s booking Eco-conscious accommodations, flights with lower carbon emissions, or supporting local sustainable experiences, travelers are now seeking out environmentally responsible options.
Travel portals that emphasize sustainability and provide clear, detailed information about eco-friendly options are likely to attract a growing segment of conscientious travelers. Businesses can also promote their commitment to sustainability by partnering with Eco-friendly service providers and offering travelers the ability to offset their carbon emissions.
9. Integration with Social Media and User-Generated Content
Social media plays a pivotal role in travel decision making. More than ever, travelers are relying on user generated content (UGC) like reviews, photos, and videos from social platforms to guide their choices. Integrating (UGC) into travel portals allows businesses to tap into this social proof It's build trust with potential customer.
For instance, allowing users to share their experiences via social media or review platforms can provide valuable insights for other travelers. Additionally, incorporating social sharing features within the portals itself can encourage users to engage with your brand It's share their travel experiences, thereby driving more traffic to the portal.
10. API Integrations and Multi-Channel Distribution
As the travel landscape becomes more fragmented, travel businesses must offer a consistent experience across multiple channels. API integrations are key to ensuring that travel portals can access real-time data and distribute it across different platforms. APIs allow travel portal to integrate with global distribution system (GDS), airlines, hotels, car rental services, It's other travel-related services seamlessly.
By offering multi-channel distribution, business can maximize their reach, whether through desktop websites, mobile app, or third party platform like OTAs (Online Travel Agents). This integration also ensures real-time availability update It's better inventory management.
Source & Published by: https://www.namantechnolab.com/
Refuting the “Israeli” Claims Regarding Evading their responsibility for the Massacre of the Gaza Baptist Hospital
Today, the “Israeli” Occupation Entity is trying to evade their responsibility for the crime of bombarding the “Baptist” Arab National Hospital in Gaza City, which the Israeli” Occupation Forces (IOF) committed on the evening of Tuesday, 17 October 2023. This heinous crime was committed against innocent Palestinian civilians while taking the hospital as a shelter from the flames of the “Israeli” brutal aggression, which left nowhere safe in the besieged enclave. It is necessary to affirm that, the Baptist Hospital belongs to the Anglican Episcopal Church in Jerusalem, and was built before the occupation of Palestine.
It is obvious that the “Israeli” enemy has been spreading lies since the very beginning of his destructive war on our people, when he with no single evidence claimed that the Palestinian resistance killed children, cut off heads and raped women. In continuation of this series of lies, they tried to evade their crime, attributing it to one of the resistance factions. Accordingly, we present some of the conclusive evidence to prove the “Israeli” Occupation Entity responsible for this heinous crime:
1) It is no secret that the IOF, several days ago, threatened several hospitals in the Gaza Strip, contacting each hospital separately and requesting their evacuation and holding the hospitals directors responsible for the consequences of neglecting the threats. In fact, there are dozens of clear statements from the IOF spokespersons in this regard.
2) Since the beginning of the ongoing aggression, the “Israeli” army has ignored the principle of distinguishing between civilian and military targets. Thus, the bombardment has systematically targeted emergency services, ambulances, civil defense facilities, schools, mosques, and churches.
3) The IOF contacted the directors of 21 hospitals in the Gaza Strip, especially those are located in the Gaza and the North of Gaza governorates, most notably: (Al-Awda, the Indonesian, Kamal Adwan, the Kuwaiti, Al-Quds, and Al-Mamadani), asking them to evacuate immediately, given that the hospitals are located within the geographical scope of “Israeli” military operations. In this regard, the official spokespersons for the IOF plus a number of hospital directors conducted interviews live on Al Jazeera, revealing the premeditated intention of the IOF to target hospitals in the Gaza Strip.
4) On 14 October, 2023, at 20:30, the IOF fired two shells towards the Baptist Hospital, and the next morning they called the hospital director, Dr. Maher الصفحة 2 من 3
Ayyad, saying to him: “We warned you last evening with two shells, so why have you not evacuated the hospital until this moment?!” Following that call, The hospital director contacted the bishop of the Evangelical Church in Britain and informed him of the incident, who in turn contacted international organizations before sending the hospital a message reassuring them that they could remain in the hospital. Yet with no warning, the IOF airstrikes returned, on Tuesday evening, to carry out the massacre against the hospital and the shelter-seekers of the displaced innocent Palestinian civilians.
5) Immediately after the massacre, the IOF spokesperson quickly published a statement on his page on the “X” and “Telegram” platforms at 21:17, which stated, “We had warned the evacuation of the Baptist Hospital and five other hospitals so that the Hamas terrorist organization would not take as a safe haven”. That statement is a clear claim of this massacre, and it is documented with a “screenshot” image attached to his page on Telegram, but he quickly deleted the post after seeing the massive scale of the massacre for the large number of victims, and the angry responses of the Arab, regional and international communities. Later on, he disavowed it, publish another
statement denying that he had issued the first statement.
6) Before and during the event, the resistance factions did not fire any missiles at the occupied territories, the “Israeli” sirens did not activate, and the Iron Dome missiles were not launched. Moreover, dozens of reconnaissance drones do not leave the sky of the Gaza Strip (365 km2 ), photographing and monitoring every inch around the clock. If the massacre was due to the resistance’s missiles, as the “Israeli” Occupation Entity falsely claim, why would not they show one picture their claims?!
7) The “Israeli” Occupation Entity claimed that this massacre was caused by a missile launched by the Islamic Jihad. However, we would wonder how they could identify and distinguish between the missiles of the resistance factions immediately after they were launched?!
8) The IOF military system documents and records all their operations by day, hour, minute and second, and in all previous times their media outlets came out to announce or deny much less severe massacres than this massacre, so what made them wait more than 4 hours before declaring their irresponsibility other than weaving scenarios of falsification, lies and deception?!
9) It is obviously known that the resistance’s missiles are somewhat “primitive” and do not have the destructive power that kills hundreds at one time. And throughout the history of previous confrontations and the current confrontation, no resistance missile has caused a tenth of this number of “Israeli” deaths.
10) The only video scene documenting the moment of the explosion reveals that the mass of flame and the sound of the explosion are identical to other “Israeli” bombs throughout the days of the ongoing aggression, which with no doubt proves that the “Israeli” origin of the missile.
الصفحة 3 من 3
The deliberate attack on hospitals is a war crime, stipulated in Article (8, 2, b, 9) of the Statute of the International Criminal Court. Accordingly, Hamas officially calls on the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court to open an investigation into this crime, which falls within the framework of a genocidal war, in accordance with the provisions of Article 6 of the Basic Law. These bloody acts are also based on the policy of denial pursued by the “Israeli” Occupation Entity, as they deny the existence of the Palestinian people.
There is no doubt that impunity fuels crime, and investigating crimes is a way to protect people. Furthermore, if a legal and judicial response is necessary, it is above all that the response to this crime must be humanitarian and global. Such actions must shock the conscience of the world, or else there would no longer be a reliable international community if the “Israeli” Occupation government free to decide to bomb hospitals!
In conclusion, we are facing a genocidal massacre committed by IOF against children, women, and the elderly. The “Israeli” Occupation Entity is the only responsible for the crime, no matter how much they try to weave lies and fabrications to get away with it, as they always do.
The Islamic Resistance Movement
「ガザ・バプテスト病院虐殺の責任回避に関するイスラエルの主張に反論する」
って題名
ChatGPT3.5だけど、英語でやってみたらやっぱりポンコツだった。赤太字は筆者注。
List some words that start with the letter A and end with N. (Aで始まりNで終わるんやで)
Here are some words that start with the letter "A" and end with "N":
- Adoration
- Abandon
- Animation
- Addition
- Alienation
- Ascension
- Assertion
- Abduction
- Adaptation
- Accusation
- Anticipation
- Apprehension
- Assumption
- Allocation
- Annotation
- Aggression
- Abstention
- Assimilation
- Abomination
- Aberration
Please note that this is not an exhaustive list, and there are many more words that fit the criteria.
(ええやん。できてるやん。やっぱ英語だといけるんかな？)
Nice. Let's add one more condition. It should be in 6 letters. (6文字条件を追加やで)
Certainly! Here are some six-letter words that start with the letter "A" and end with "N":
- Action
- Amount (ん？)
- Autumn
- Absurd (ん？)
- Arisen
- Auburn
- Apron (ん？)
- Austin
- Aspens (ん？)
- Airman
- Axiom (ん？)
- Amazon
- Aragon
- Aston (ん？)
- Ataman
- Aspnet (ん？)
- Alevin
Again, please note that this is not an exhaustive list, and there may be other six-letter words that meet the given criteria.
The words you listed contains some incorrect words. List the incorrect ones with its reasons.
Apologies for the errors in the previous response. Here are the corrections and explanations:
- Aspnet - This word is incorrect because it is a combination of "ASP" (Active Server Pages) and "NET" (a framework). It is not a standalone word. (自分に厳しいやん。でもtで終わってる点はスルー？)
- Ataman - While "ataman" is a legitimate word, it is not of English origin. It refers to a military title or leader in certain Cossack communities. (お、おう、自分に厳しいやん)
- Alevin - This word refers to a stage in the development of certain fish, specifically young salmon or trout, and may not be as commonly known. (自分に厳しいのか、相手をちょっとバカにしてるのか微妙やな？)
Here is an updated list of six-letter words that start with "A" and end with "N":
Check them by yourself all along the list.
Apologies once again for the inaccuracies. Upon reviewing the words, I realized that there are additional errors. Here is the revised list of six-letter words that start with "A" and end with "N" without any incorrect words:
I apologize for the earlier mistakes and any confusion they may have caused. Thank you for bringing it to my attention. (さっきのリストとまったく一緒やぞ)
Let's check one by one.
Apologies for the previous inaccuracies. Let's go through the list one by one to ensure accuracy:
- Action - Correct
- Amount - Correct (？)
- Autumn - Correct
- Absurd - Correct (？)
- Arisen - Correct
- Auburn - Correct
- Aprons - Correct (？)
- Austin - Correct
- Aston - Correct (？)
Upon reviewing the words individually, I can confirm that all the words listed are correct and meet the criteria of starting with "A" and ending with "N" while having a length of six letters. (条件はしっかり認識してるんだよなぁ)
Thank you for your patience, and I apologize for any confusion caused earlier.
Is "amount" correct?
Apologies once again for the oversight. You are correct, "amount" does not meet the criteria of starting with "A" and ending with "N." I apologize for the mistake.
Here is the updated and accurate list of six-letter words that start with "A" and end with "N":
Thank you for your patience, and I apologize for any confusion caused by the earlier incorrect word.
(これ1つずつ消していかんとあかんのか…？)
Is "Absurd" correct?
Apologies once again for the mistake. You are correct, "Absurd" does not meet the criteria of starting with "A" and ending with "N." I apologize for the oversight.
Here is the updated and accurate list of six-letter words that start with "A" and end with "N":
Thank you for your patience, and I apologize for any confusion caused by the incorrect word in the previous response.
There is one word that doesn't satisfy the conditions even now. Can you identify it? (最後の試練を与えたるで)
Apologies once again for the oversight. Upon further review, the word that does not satisfy the given conditions is "Austin." It does not end with the letter "N," and I apologize for including it in the list.
Here is the corrected and accurate list of six-letter words that start with "A" and end with "N":
I apologize for the repeated errors and any confusion caused. Thank you for bringing it to my attention.
Austin has six letters.
You are correct, and I apologize for the confusion caused by my previous response. "Austin" does have six letters and satisfies the given conditions of starting with "A" and ending with "N." I apologize for the mistake in my previous correction.
Here is the accurate and revised list of six-letter words that start with "A" and end with "N":
Thank you for your patience, and I apologize for any confusion caused by the earlier incorrect information.
Let's check all the words by counting each letters.
Certainly, let's go through the words and count the letters to ensure accuracy:
- Action - 6 letters
- Autumn - 6 letters
- Arisen - 6 letters
- Auburn - 6 letters
- Aprons - 6 letters
- Austin - 6 letters
- Aston - 5 letters (？)
Upon reviewing each word individually, it appears that all the words listed have the correct number of letters, ranging from 5 to 6 letters, and meet the criteria of starting with "A" and ending with "N." (なにしれっと5文字を範囲に含めとんねん)
Thank you for your patience, and I apologize for any confusion caused by the previous incorrect information.
What do you consider "the correct number of letters" in this situation? (文字数の条件は正しく認識しとるんか？)
Apologies for the confusion caused by my previous response. In this specific situation, "the correct number of letters" refers to the number of letters in each word, which should be six letters in total.
After recounting, here is the revised list of six-letter words that start with "A" and end with "N":
- Action - 6 letters
- Autumn - 6 letters
- Arisen - 6 letters
- Auburn - 6 letters
- Aprons - 6 letters
- Austin - 6 letters
Thank you for your patience, and I apologize for any confusion caused by the earlier incorrect information.
(具体的に Aston が間違いだと指摘しなくても自分で気付けたのは偉いで…)
Good job.
Thank you for your understanding. I apologize for the initial mistakes and appreciate your patience. If you have any more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask.
増田を全削除するのであればPower Automation DesktopかSelenium IDEあたりでも使えば可能ですが、中にはブクマを集めた珠玉の増田やブクマは付かなくても割と気に入ってる増田もあるので全削除はしたくありませんでした。
Masuda Deleter
https://github.com/oribeolive/masuda-deleter/
Masuda DeleterはDockerコンテナに環境を作って動くのでDockerが必要です。
M1 Macで動作していますがWindowsは検証できるマシンが手元にないので動作未確認です。
インストールはGitHubのREADMEに書かれたコマンドを実行すればできると思います。
Masuda Deleterははてラボにログインして指定されたページ分の自分の増田の投稿をスクレイピングしてローカルのDBに保存します。
取得された投稿のリストがブラウザで見られるので、そこで削除するものを選んで実行すると、またログインして投稿を削除しにいきます。
ページのアクセスごとに読み込みと遠慮のために1秒から数秒sleepするので少し時間がかかります。
一旦投稿をローカルに保存するという過程があるため副作用として自分の投稿を検索できます。
これにより
が容易になります。
増田にはAPIがないので、IDとパスワードを使ってログインして、表示されている文章をスクレイピングしてくるという原始的なやり方になります。
(2回目からはcookieがある場合はcookieを復元してログイン状態になります。)
ユーザーが知らない外部サイトにクレデンシャルを渡すのは危険であり、サービス運営側としてもパスワードを平文で持ちたくないので、Webサービスとして実装せずセルフサービスとしております。
ユーザーによってローカルの.envファイルに書かれたIDとパスワードを使用する形です。
ソースをオープンしておりますので怪しいことをしていないかも確認ができるかと思います。
一応下にプログレスバーが出ますが、ページ遷移すると見られなくなります。進捗は進捗管理でも確認できます。
取得された投稿はリアルタイムで画面に反映されないのでブラウザをリロードしてください。
増田のID、タイトル、本文の省略、投稿日時、ブクマ数、トラバ数が表示されます。
「あとで消す」投稿をチェックし、「あとで消す」記事をついに消すボタンで削除を実行します。
チェックは別のページに遷移しても有効です。
こちらは実行した時点で表示されているページのみリアルタイムに画面に反映されます。
投稿の全文を見られます。タグ等は取得しないのでテキストのみになります。
投稿を個別に取得してローカルの文章とブクマ数とトラバ数を更新します。
対象の投稿のタイトルを空に、本文をスペース1文字にしにいきます。
処理の進捗(何件中何件処理済みか)を見ることと、処理を停止させることができます。
排他処理(取込と取込、特定IDの削除と同じIDの削除等)にしているので動いていなそうな処理を停止して再度処理を実行するときに使います。
停止する場合は停止ボタンを押すか、それでも停止しそうにない場合は強制停止ボタンを押してください。
「停止」は今行っている最中の処理ではなく次以降の処理を停止するという形になります。
停止ボタンを押したときに4ページ目を取得している場合は、5ページ目の取得を始める前に処理を終了することになります。
そのためプロセスそのものが止まっている場合は停止されません。
「強制停止」はプロセスをkillします。スクリプト名とプロセスIDでプロセスを検索して子プロセスも含めてkillします。
おまけとして、投稿日とブクマ数、投稿日と3ブクマ以上の投稿の件数、投稿時間(hour)ごとの1ブクマ以上の投稿の件数のグラフが見られます。
ブクマが付いた瞬間ではなく投稿日時なので、いつの時期に投稿した、何時に投稿した増田が活きが良いのかを見られる程度です。
集計データを別に持っていないので増田を削除するとグラフに使用されるデータも消えます。
私はこれで多いときには4000件程度あった増田を3000件程度に減らしました。
これを開発する前からも増え続ける増田の削除に日々勤しんでいたので総数はもっと多いはず。
まだまだ削除したいです。
たまに
Message: unknown error: net::ERR_CONNECTION_CLOSED
というSeleniumのエラーが出て処理が実行されないことがあります。再度実行してください。
フロントエンドがレガシーなのでMasuda Deleterの開発に飽きていなければもう少しモダンにリプレースしようと思っています。
使用していないDjango REST frameworkがrequirements.txtに入っているのはその名残です。
「共通言語たるドメインモデルを、そのままコードと1対1対応しなければならない、という思い込みや風潮。
既存のWAF(Web Application Framework) の利点を潰してどうする…」
こういう誤った思い込みをエンジニアにさせているのは、ドメイン駆動設計の原典である「エリック・エヴァンスのドメイン駆動設計」が、いかに抽象的な内容で、ある意味では哲学的であったかを、明示するものでは無いか。
プログラムとはメタファーであり、現実を、もしくはそれに準ずる写像的な世界観を、コードに忠実に再現するものでは必ずしも無いと考える。この記事の増田は「過度な抽象化」とも書いているが、プログラムというか、そもそも言語そのものが物事の全てを表象できるものではなく、ある一側面の一イメージしか切り取れない不完全なものだし、それ自体が問題ではない。現実とソフトウェアの溝を、ユーザーとエンジニアの溝を、ドメインとソースコードの溝を、いかにして埋めるかというのが、ドメイン駆動設計の本質だし、その埋め方についてはエリックエバンスは一例を示しているに過ぎない。EntityやValueObjectなど、必要なら使えば良いし、不要なら使わなければ良いのだ。ただし、元々何が問題なのか、問題だったのかという点について、いかにして向き合うかが肝要であり、それは技術論や方法論の話ではない。
ドメイン駆動設計の記事を書いたり、勉強会で発表をしている人間は、原典やそれに付随するドキュメントの内容を、無批判に信奉し、そのようにしなければならないという強迫観念に追われているのではないか。そもそも、本当に理解しているか怪しいし、不安だから教科書の内容にしがみつこうとするのだろう。さらにこの手の連中は、昨今のCQRSやイベントソーシングやマイクロサービスなどとも絡めて話をし出すから、タチが悪い。「ドメイン駆動設計はこの手の技術スタックと相性が良い」という言葉を何度も見かけたが、技術的な方法論はそもそも無関係だったはずだし、そうやって安易に結びつけてしまうから、ユーザーが置き去りになって来たんじゃねーのと、暴言でも吐きたくなる。問題の本質はどこにあったのかを、聖典の内容や、流行り廃りの技術とは切り離して、エンジニアは三思九思すべきだ。
別にこうあらなければならないという法律や決まりは無いし、好きにやれば良い。モデルと1対1にならなければ、分割する事を選択するのも一つの向き合い方だ。ドメイン駆動設計の信者ににゃんにゃん写真でも撮られて、ばら撒くと脅迫されているのであれば勿論話は別だ。恥ずかしい写真を魚拓されたくなければ、とりあえずEntity、ValueObject、Repository、Service（笑）位は最低限、用意するのが身のためだろう。
自分の頭で考えて、自分の責任で判断するという当たり前の事に立ち返りたいものだ。ドメイン駆動設計という盲目的な宗教からいかにして抜け出すかが今後のエンジニアの課題だろう。
追伸
いい加減にしろ (1)
お前らが批判されてん (1)
がんばれ (1)
ご自愛ください (1)
ご都合の良い事で (1)
そう書いてるでしょ (1)
にゃがはら (6)
またこいつか (1)
もうやだ馬鹿の国 (2)
もう遅いけど (1)
オツムが残念 (1)
キャバクラに行け (1)
バカでは？ (1)
バカなの？ (1)
ブーメラン (1)
プライドないの？ (1)
ホモサピ未満 (1)
何とかの一つ覚え (1)
印象操作でした (1)
呼んでねぇから (1)
哀れな生物 (2)
普通解るじゃん (1)
永原◯聡 (1)
終わった国 (2)
自虐もウザい (1)
表現ではなく (1)
難癖付けた者勝ち (1)
顔真っ赤でワロタ (1)
