  |
はてなキーワード: FACESとは
Please consider the histroy of humanity from biological perpsecitve and current known fact in nearby universe, which expo-planet (from the Sol system perspective) is most likely to have civlizaed society? Please add percentage next to it in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanet civilization likelihoodを28 秒行う
Evaluating planetary prospects
OK, I’m looking at the likelihood of a civilized society on an exoplanet within our Solar System. I’ll consider biological history and current space knowledge, aiming to identify the most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from our Solar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard's Star, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1, focusing on their habitable zones and available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilized society likelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m noting key exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which have Earth-like characteristics and are in habitable zones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advanced civilizations.
I'm gathering info on planets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, considering factors like magnetic fields, atmospheres, and proximity to G-type stars for their potential to support advanced civilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despite being close and around a red dwarf star, might support life if it has a magnetic field and atmosphere. This makes me think about its potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimating civilization probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculative percentages based on the Drake equation and the lack of evidence for intelligent life.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names and civilization likelihood percentages, grounded in the long timeline of life's evolution, despite the speculative nature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering their star types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advanced civilizations from our solar system's viewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due to its closeness and observational potential, despite concerns about its flare star dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'm focusing on exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, and K2-18b, aiming to chart their likelihood of hosting a civilized society based on current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society, considering Earth's long biological history.
Refining odds
I'm considering the astronomical timeline for intelligent life on Earth, leading me to assign even lower speculative odds for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrary percentages, clearly noting the speculative nature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience's basic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrary percentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculative nature, and ensuring the data is accessible for young audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating a markdown table with speculative percentages for the likelihood of civilized life on exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoretical nature and considering the understanding level of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mapping out a markdown chart with speculative percentages for the likelihood of a civilized society on exoplanets, mindful of the complexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecing together markdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b's reduced civilized life chance due to the red dwarf's activity. This inclusion highlights the speculative nature of the analysis.
Piecing together speculative odds
I’m detailing a markdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanet likelihoods, considering environmental challenges and adding a disclaimer about the speculative nature and lack of evidence.
Piecing together
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b for its proximity and silent star, but I’ll add a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advanced civilizations' hypothetical likelihood.
Assessing civilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligent life on Earth, which suggests that the odds of any habitable planet developing a complex civilization might be as low as a few percent.
Below is a very speculative chart that—based on what we know about Earth’s long, winding path from simple life to a “civilized society” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives some fun, made‑up percentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists have not yet found any proof of life (let alone advanced civilizations) on any exoplanet. These numbers are just playful estimates to help you think about the ideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an Advanced Civilization on Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet Estimated Likelihood of a Civilized Society
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
How Did We (Very Roughly) Guess These Numbers?
Earth’s Example:
On Earth, life began as simple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that built complex societies. This long journey suggests that—even if a planet is in the “habitable zone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilized society might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
This is the closest exoplanet to us. Even though its star (Proxima Centauri) is a red dwarf that sometimes sends out strong flares (which might harm life), its closeness makes it one of our most interesting candidates. That’s why we give it a slightly higher guess (~2%).
These planets are part of a group orbiting a very cool star. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaning one side always faces the star), so the chance of a complex, advanced civilization might be a bit lower.
LHS 1140 b:
This planet is promising in some ways but is a little farther away and around a dimmer star, so our playful estimate is even lower.
All of these percentages are extremely rough guesses based on what little we understand about the conditions for life and intelligence. Scientists use ideas like the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concrete evidence, these numbers remain just for fun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring these ideas—and remember, space is full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equation itself and see if this euqation is acculate or more opition in the equation you will use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation's value
OK, let me see. The Drake Equation isn't a precise formula; it's more of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrial civilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluating its conceptual nature, its uncertain parameters, and its criticism to conclude on its reliability as an accurate predictive model.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mapping out the Drake Equation as a conceptual guide, detailing its parameters, which are often based on estimates or opinions, to evaluate its reliability for predicting extraterrestrial civilizations.
The Drake Equation is a famous formula that was created to help scientists think about the many factors involved in estimating the number of detectable extraterrestrial civilizations in our galaxy. However, when we look at the equation closely, we see that it is more of a conceptual framework or heuristic tool than a precise, predictive formula. Let’s break down why:
The equation is usually written as:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The average rate of star formation per year in our galaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of those stars that have planetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The average number of planets that could potentially support life per star with planets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of those planets where life actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction of planets with life where intelligent life evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction of civilizations that develop technology that releases detectable signals into space.
𝐿
L: The length of time such civilizations release detectable signals.
Why the Drake Equation Is More of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction of stars with planets), have become better known through modern astronomy.
The parameters related to the development of life and intelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—are based on very limited data. For example, Earth is the only planet we know where life has developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for these factors. This means that the values chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of Possible Values:
Because many of these factors are not well-constrained, if you change one of the more uncertain parameters even slightly, the final estimate for
𝑁
N (the number of civilizations) can vary by many orders of magnitude. This wide range shows that the equation can lead to very different outcomes based on personal or theoretical assumptions.
The Drake Equation was never meant to provide a precise answer. Instead, it serves as a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrial civilizations. It encourages discussion about the relative importance of different factors and highlights where our scientific knowledge is limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate or More Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In the sense of being a strict mathematical model with well-defined inputs and predictable outputs, the Drake Equation is not accurate. Its accuracy is limited by the extreme uncertainties in several of its key parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning the evolution of life and intelligence, are based on opinion, interpretation, and the single example of Earth. Therefore, while the structure of the equation is logical, the numbers you put into it (and hence the final result) are often more reflective of our current opinions and assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equation is a valuable tool for framing the question of extraterrestrial life. It helps scientists and enthusiasts break down a complex problem into smaller, more manageable questions. However, because several of its factors are highly uncertain and subject to personal interpretation, it is more of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of the number of extraterrestrial civilizations.
In summary, while the Drake Equation is useful for thinking about the various factors that might lead to the emergence of a civilization, its outputs should be taken as highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the long history of Sol system and nearby planets and see if there is any possiblites that in one time intelligent life emerged in nearby planets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-human intelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-human intelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligent life forms in the Sol system and neighboring planets, and how this might factor into the equation.
Piecing together possibilities
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligent life, possibly on Mars or Europa, into the Drake Equation for the Sol system and neighboring planets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligent life emerging on Mars or Venus, though Earth remains the only known life-supporting planet in the solar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligent life could have emerged on planets like Mars, Venus, or Europa, and how this possibility aligns with the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligent life on Mars or Venus could intersect with the assumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems to focus solely on Earth-based evolution.
I’m piecing together the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligent life in the solar system. Mars, Venus, and Titan present challenges, but Europa and Enceladus might harbor microbial life.
Please consider the histroy of humanity from biological perpsecitve and current known fact in nearby universe, which expo-planet (from the Sol system perspective) is most likely to have civlizaed society? Please add percentage next to it in the chart
ChatGPT
Reasoned about exoplanet civilization likelihoodを28 秒行う
Evaluating planetary prospects
OK, I’m looking at the likelihood of a civilized society on an exoplanet within our Solar System. I’ll consider biological history and current space knowledge, aiming to identify the most promising candidate.
Identifying potential candidates
I'm considering exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1e, which might suggest they are within or observed from our Solar System.
Assessing potential candidates
I’m evaluating Proxima Centauri b, Barnard's Star, LHS 1140, and TRAPPIST-1, focusing on their habitable zones and available data. The Drake equation might help estimate their civilized society likelihoods.
Identifying promising exoplanets
I’m noting key exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, which have Earth-like characteristics and are in habitable zones. This narrows down the potential candidates for advanced civilizations.
I'm gathering info on planets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1, considering factors like magnetic fields, atmospheres, and proximity to G-type stars for their potential to support advanced civilizations.
Evaluating exoplanet prospects
I'm noting that Proxima Centauri b, despite being close and around a red dwarf star, might support life if it has a magnetic field and atmosphere. This makes me think about its potential.
Charting probabilities
I'm estimating civilization probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e, using speculative percentages based on the Drake equation and the lack of evidence for intelligent life.
I'm crafting a chart with exoplanet names and civilization likelihood percentages, grounded in the long timeline of life's evolution, despite the speculative nature of these figures.
Identifying exoplanet contenders
I’m evaluating exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, TRAPPIST-1 e, and Kepler-186f, considering their star types and distances, to gauge their potential for supporting advanced civilizations from our solar system's viewpoint.
Weighing proximity and observation
I'm leaning towards Proxima Centauri b due to its closeness and observational potential, despite concerns about its flare star dynamics. TRAPPIST-1 e, f, or g are also worth considering.
I'm focusing on exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b, Ross 128 b, LHS 1140 b, TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, and K2-18b, aiming to chart their likelihood of hosting a civilized society based on current knowledge.
Assessing exoplanet potentials
I'm gathering speculative probabilities for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, using the Drake equation and current understanding, to better estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society.
Refining speculative probabilities
I’m refining speculative probabilities for exoplanets, including Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e/f/g, to estimate their chances of hosting a civilized society, considering Earth's long biological history.
Refining odds
I'm considering the astronomical timeline for intelligent life on Earth, leading me to assign even lower speculative odds for exoplanets like Proxima Centauri b and TRAPPIST-1 e.
I’m crafting a simplified chart with arbitrary percentages, clearly noting the speculative nature and lack of scientific data, while considering the target audience's basic understanding of the topic.
I’m charting arbitrary percentages for exoplanets, clarifying their speculative nature, and ensuring the data is accessible for young audiences with minimal scientific detail.
Crafting a chart
I’m creating a markdown table with speculative percentages for the likelihood of civilized life on exoplanets, emphasizing their purely theoretical nature and considering the understanding level of an 8-year-old.
Integrating speculative analysis
I’m mapping out a markdown chart with speculative percentages for the likelihood of a civilized society on exoplanets, mindful of the complexity and simplifying for an 8-year-old's understanding.
I’m piecing together markdown for exoplanets, noting Proxima Centauri b's reduced civilized life chance due to the red dwarf's activity. This inclusion highlights the speculative nature of the analysis.
Piecing together speculative odds
I’m detailing a markdown chart for audience-friendly exoplanet likelihoods, considering environmental challenges and adding a disclaimer about the speculative nature and lack of evidence.
Piecing together
I’m leaning towards Proxima Centauri b for its proximity and silent star, but I’ll add a speculative chart ranking nearby exoplanets, noting their advanced civilizations' hypothetical likelihood.
Assessing civilization probabilities
I'm emphasizing the slow emergence of intelligent life on Earth, which suggests that the odds of any habitable planet developing a complex civilization might be as low as a few percent.
Below is a very speculative chart that—based on what we know about Earth’s long, winding path from simple life to a “civilized society” and our limited observations of nearby exoplanets—gives some fun, made‑up percentage chances for a few of our best candidate exoplanets. Remember: Scientists have not yet found any proof of life (let alone advanced civilizations) on any exoplanet. These numbers are just playful estimates to help you think about the ideas!
Speculative Chances of Finding an Advanced Civilization on Nearby Exoplanets
Exoplanet Estimated Likelihood of a Civilized Society
Proxima Centauri b ~2%
LHS 1140 b ~0.5%
How Did We (Very Roughly) Guess These Numbers?
Earth’s Example:
On Earth, life began as simple single‑celled organisms and took billions of years to evolve into a species that built complex societies. This long journey suggests that—even if a planet is in the “habitable zone” (where liquid water could exist)—developing an advanced, civilized society might be rare.
Proxima Centauri b:
This is the closest exoplanet to us. Even though its star (Proxima Centauri) is a red dwarf that sometimes sends out strong flares (which might harm life), its closeness makes it one of our most interesting candidates. That’s why we give it a slightly higher guess (~2%).
These planets are part of a group orbiting a very cool star. Their environments might be challenging (for example, they could be tidally locked, meaning one side always faces the star), so the chance of a complex, advanced civilization might be a bit lower.
LHS 1140 b:
This planet is promising in some ways but is a little farther away and around a dimmer star, so our playful estimate is even lower.
All of these percentages are extremely rough guesses based on what little we understand about the conditions for life and intelligence. Scientists use ideas like the Drake Equation to think about these chances—but until we have concrete evidence, these numbers remain just for fun and imagination.
Enjoy exploring these ideas—and remember, space is full of mysteries waiting to be discovered!
あなた:
Please examine the Drake Equation itself and see if this euqation is acculate or more opition in the equation you will use
ChatGPT
Reasoned about the Drake Equationを6 秒行う
re-examining the Drake Equation
evaluating the Drake Equation's value
OK, let me see. The Drake Equation isn't a precise formula; it's more of a guiding heuristic that tackles numerous uncertainties regarding extraterrestrial civilizations.
Thinking through the Drake Equation, I’m evaluating its conceptual nature, its uncertain parameters, and its criticism to conclude on its reliability as an accurate predictive model.
Understanding the Drake Equation
I’m mapping out the Drake Equation as a conceptual guide, detailing its parameters, which are often based on estimates or opinions, to evaluate its reliability for predicting extraterrestrial civilizations.
The Drake Equation is a famous formula that was created to help scientists think about the many factors involved in estimating the number of detectable extraterrestrial civilizations in our galaxy. However, when we look at the equation closely, we see that it is more of a conceptual framework or heuristic tool than a precise, predictive formula. Let’s break down why:
The equation is usually written as:
𝑁
=
𝑅
∗
×
𝑓
𝑝
×
𝑛
𝑒
×
𝑓
𝑙
×
𝑓
𝑖
×
𝑓
𝑐
×
𝐿
N=R
∗
×f
p
×n
e
×f
l
×f
i
×f
c
×L
Where:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
: The average rate of star formation per year in our galaxy.
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
: The fraction of those stars that have planetary systems.
𝑛
𝑒
n
e
: The average number of planets that could potentially support life per star with planets.
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
: The fraction of those planets where life actually develops.
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
: The fraction of planets with life where intelligent life evolves.
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
: The fraction of civilizations that develop technology that releases detectable signals into space.
𝐿
L: The length of time such civilizations release detectable signals.
Why the Drake Equation Is More of a Guideline Than a Precise Formula
Uncertain Inputs:
𝑅
∗
R
∗
𝑓
𝑝
f
p
(fraction of stars with planets), have become better known through modern astronomy.
The parameters related to the development of life and intelligence—
𝑓
𝑙
f
l
,
𝑓
𝑖
f
i
,
𝑓
𝑐
f
c
, and
𝐿
L—are based on very limited data. For example, Earth is the only planet we know where life has developed, so we have no way to compare or derive a statistically robust estimate for these factors. This means that the values chosen for these parameters are largely subjective estimates or educated guesses.
Wide Ranges of Possible Values:
Because many of these factors are not well-constrained, if you change one of the more uncertain parameters even slightly, the final estimate for
𝑁
N (the number of civilizations) can vary by many orders of magnitude. This wide range shows that the equation can lead to very different outcomes based on personal or theoretical assumptions.
The Drake Equation was never meant to provide a precise answer. Instead, it serves as a way to organize our thinking about what conditions might be necessary for the development of extraterrestrial civilizations. It encourages discussion about the relative importance of different factors and highlights where our scientific knowledge is limited.
Is the Drake Equation Accurate or More Opinion-Based?
Accurate?
In the sense of being a strict mathematical model with well-defined inputs and predictable outputs, the Drake Equation is not accurate. Its accuracy is limited by the extreme uncertainties in several of its key parameters.
Many of the terms in the equation, especially those concerning the evolution of life and intelligence, are based on opinion, interpretation, and the single example of Earth. Therefore, while the structure of the equation is logical, the numbers you put into it (and hence the final result) are often more reflective of our current opinions and assumptions than of robust empirical data.
The Drake Equation is a valuable tool for framing the question of extraterrestrial life. It helps scientists and enthusiasts break down a complex problem into smaller, more manageable questions. However, because several of its factors are highly uncertain and subject to personal interpretation, it is more of a conceptual guide—or even a way to stimulate discussion—than a formula that provides a definitive, accurate prediction of the number of extraterrestrial civilizations.
In summary, while the Drake Equation is useful for thinking about the various factors that might lead to the emergence of a civilization, its outputs should be taken as highly speculative estimates rather than precise measurements.
あなた:
Please also consider the possiblities of non-human intelligent emrgencing from the long history of Sol system and nearby planets and see if there is any possiblites that in one time intelligent life emerged in nearby planets and see this to the equation
ChatGPT
Reasoned about non-human intelligence and the Drake Equationを19 秒行う
Evaluating non-human intelligence
I'm thinking about the potential for non-human intelligent life forms in the Sol system and neighboring planets, and how this might factor into the equation.
Piecing together possibilities
I'm thinking about how to integrate the emergence of non-human intelligent life, possibly on Mars or Europa, into the Drake Equation for the Sol system and neighboring planets.
It's interesting to think about the hypothesis of intelligent life emerging on Mars or Venus, though Earth remains the only known life-supporting planet in the solar system.
Considering other realms
I'm examining if intelligent life could have emerged on planets like Mars, Venus, or Europa, and how this possibility aligns with the predictions of the Drake Equation.
Hmm, I’m thinking about how non-human intelligent life on Mars or Venus could intersect with the assumptions of the Drake Equation, which seems to focus solely on Earth-based evolution.
I’m piecing together the hypothesis of non-human, advanced, intelligent life in the solar system. Mars, Venus, and Titan present challenges, but Europa and Enceladus might harbor microbial life.
これはHoYoFairの同人作品といってもおそらく準公式みたいなもんで、公式からディレクションがいくらか入ってるはず
サフェルは黒猫
ファイノンはたぶん青いたてがみの白馬2頭が曳くチャリオット、兵というより馬の方だろうか
ファイノンはバッドエンドのエンドロールで役名が？？になっていたのでこの絵面が彼の本質の暗喩になってる可能性がある
人外の中で黄色い目を持つ青黒いゴーレムは暗黒の潮により狂気に侵されたタイタンの尖兵と捉えていいだろう
地から天へと昇っていく不死鳥も黄金裔の一人だとすると、公開されてる8人のうち、一致しそうなものはヒアンシーくらいだろう
天へ昇っていく途中でおそらく「天空」のエーグルにロックオンされ、反応した尖兵に握りつぶされた
この流れはオンパロスPVのヒアンシーパートで白い鳥が矢に散らされるシーンとも一致するので多分そう
そうするとアナイクスだけが登場していないことになるが、疑わしいのは全体を通して傍観者ポジションにいる、黒いローブを被った灰色髪の少女か少年
螺旋の蛇あるいは絡む小枝のような意匠がローブに見られるのでケリュケイオンの印つながりで
この子がアナイクスに関連するのかもしれない、青っぽいグレーの髪色も一致している
また歌詞から、ローブ少年は不死鳥を希望として見いだしていて、送り出しているようにも見える
全体を通して映像の中心にあるのは浮遊する巨樹で「理性」のサーシスの象徴のように思え、アナイクスもサーシスの一派だと思われることと繋がりがある
最後のシーンでモーディスとトリノン？が墜落しつつ(死の予告？)も、サーシスを象徴してそうな巨樹が折れ、火種が落ちてきている
ここからこれは未来、サーシスが殞落する場面を描いていると受け取ることができる
ただ英雄たちがサーシスを殺したというより、尖兵ゴーレムっぽいのがサーシスを攻め、混乱の中こうなったように見える
となるとこの尖兵はどのタイタンの所属か、ということだが、先述したように「天空」のエーグルが筆頭候補だろう
Take a good look—this is the LDP. A rotten ship through and through. The hull is riddled with holes, the deck is stacked with decayed planks, and the crew talks big about their voyage while steering aimlessly. They don’t even know where they’re headed—just waiting for the inevitable sinking. And what about the passengers? A chosen few lounge in luxury cabins, sipping on fine drinks, while the rest shiver on the exposed deck, battered by wind and rain. Yet, no one dares to abandon the ship. Why? Because there’s no other vessel in sight.
Those people, they claim, “We are the pillar that upholds this nation.” But that pillar is infested with termites, reduced to nothing but a hollow shell. They mask the stench of decay with flashy decorations and smooth words, and the public, gullible as ever, eats it up. This, too, is part of the sickness afflicting the country.
Defense, the economy, countermeasures for the declining birthrate—they shout these slogans at every turn, but the truth is, they’re all empty promises. Everything they touch reeks of graft, cronyism, and self-enrichment. No matter how much the people suffer, it’s of no concern to them. Every election, they trot out crowd-pleasing phrases, gather the votes, and voilà—the same faces, the same farce, over and over again.
But doesn’t it strike you as strange? Why do we keep boarding this doomed ship? Why is no one speaking up? Watching a sinking ship and doing nothing but praying won’t change a thing. If the ship is broken, we need to build a new one. If no one else will do it, then we’ll have to take the helm ourselves.
LDP, your time is up. No matter how many rotten planks you patch onto this ship, it’s destined to sink. That’s just the way of things.
----------
はてなの匿名ダイアリーの増田になった気分で，作文して．内容は，自民党を腐す感じ．ですます調は禁止．タイトルもつけて．
自民党という名の腐った船 見てくれ、これが自民党だ。まるで腐った船。船体には穴が空き、甲板には腐った木材が積まれ、乗員たちは口先だけで航海を語る。どこに行くのかも知らず、ただ沈むのを待つだけ。乗客たちはどうだ？選ばれた少数は船室で酒を酌み交わし、残りは甲板で雨風に打たれている。それでも、みんなこの船から降りようとはしない。なぜなら他に船がないからだ。 あの連中は言う。「我々こそがこの国を支える柱だ」と。しかしその柱は白蟻に喰われて、ただの見せかけになっている。腐敗臭を隠すために、華やかな装飾を加え、言葉巧みに煙に巻く。それを鵜呑みにする国民もまた、この国の病巣だ。 防衛だ、経済だ、少子化対策だと喚くけれど、その実、中身は空っぽだ。何をやっても中抜き、天下り、自分たちの懐を肥やすだけ。どれだけ国民が苦しもうと、彼らは関係ない。選挙のたびに耳触りの良いフレーズを掲げ、票を掻き集める。そして、気がつけば同じ顔ぶれ。同じことの繰り返し。 でもおかしいと思わないか？なぜこんな船にいつまでも乗り続けているのか。なぜ誰も声を上げないのか。沈みゆく船を見て、ただ祈るだけでは何も変わらない。船が壊れているなら、新しい船を造ればいい。誰もそれをしようとしないなら、俺たちがやるしかない。 自民党よ、お前たちの時代は終わった。いくら腐った木材を継ぎ足そうと、この船は沈む。それが自然の摂理だ。
おｋ．これを英語にして
In a discussion about the case, someone raised an objection to "someone who was not a party to the incident, who was not from Nagasaki, and who was not from Hiroshima, complaining about it. Seeing that opinion made me aware of my position, so I will say what I must say.
I was born in Nagasaki and am a third-generation A-bomb survivor.
I say this because I grew up hearing the stories of the A-bomb damage directly from those who suffered from the atomic bombings.
I feel that it is unacceptable for someone like me to speak about the A-bomb damage.
However, there are few A-bomb survivors left, so I will speak up.
In Nagasaki, children grow up hearing stories about the atomic bombing. We were made to sit in the gymnasium of an elementary school in the middle of summer, where there was not even an air conditioner or a fan, and for nearly an hour we were made to listen to stories about the atomic bombing. It was hard for me anyway.
I think it was even more painful for the elderly people who told the stories. But I don't think an elementary school kid could have imagined that. I, too, have forgotten most of the stories I was told. I can only remember one or two at most.
Another thing is that at this time of year, pictures of the victims of the atomic bombing are pasted up in the hallways.
In other parts of the country, these are grotesque images that would cause a fuss from the parents who are always nagging about them.
Recently, even the A-bomb museum has become more gentle in its exhibits, and most of the radical and horrifying exhibits that would have traumatized visitors have been removed.
I don't know how elementary schools now teach about the A-bomb damage. But when I was in elementary school, there were photos on display.
There was one photo that I just couldn't face as an elementary school student. It was a picture of Taniguchi Sumiteru(谷口稜曄). If you search for it, you can find it. It is a shocking picture, but I would still like you to see it.
I couldn't pass through the hallway where the photo was displayed, so I always took the long way around to another floor to avoid seeing the photo.
My grandfather was under the bomb and went to the burnt ruins of the bomb to look for his sister. I can understand now that he couldn't turn away or go another way.
There would have been a mountain of people still alive and moaning in the ruins of the burnt ruins. There would have been many more who would have died out in agony.
My grandfather walked for miles and miles, towing a rear wheelchair, through the narrow streets of rubble-strewn Nagasaki in search of his sister.
My grandfather was not a child then. But of course there were elementary school children who did the same thing he did. I am not speculating that there were. There were. I heard the story from him, and I still remember it.
A young brother and sister found their father's corpse in the ruins of the fire and burned it themselves. They didn't have enough wood to burn him alive, and when they saw his brain spilling out, they ran away, and that was the last time they ever saw him again.
I can never forget that story I heard when I was a kid, and even now it's painful and painful, my hands are shaking and I'm crying.
I keep wondering how that old man who ran away from his father's brain was able to expose to the public the unimaginably horrible trauma, the scar that will never heal, even after all these years.
Now I think I understand a little.
Why I can't help but talk about my grandfather and the old man now, even as I remember my own trauma.
Because this level of suffering is nothing compared to their words being forgotten.
It's nothing compared to the tremendous suffering that once existed that will be forgotten, like my hands shaking, my heart palpitating, my nose running with vertigo, and so on.
My grandfather, who went through an unimaginable hell, lived to see his grandchildren born, and met his sister's death in the ruins of the fire.
In other words, my grandfather was one of the happiest people in the ruins of the fire.
My grandfather and that old man were, after all, just people wading in the depths of hell.
I think that the suffering that even people who had experienced unimaginable pain could not imagine was lying like pebbles on the ground in Nagasaki 78 years ago, and no one paid any attention to it.
Their suffering, which I can't even imagine, is nothing compared to the countless, unimaginable suffering they witnessed, which they pretend never happened.
Memories fade inexorably with each passing human mouth. The memories that those people could never allow to be forgotten are almost forgotten.
The tremendous suffering of 78 years ago is mostly gone, never to be recounted.
Those who suffered the most from the atomic bombing died rotting in the ruins of the fire without being able to tell anyone about it.
Many of those who saw it with their own eyes kept their mouths shut and took it with them to their graves. Most of those who spoke a few words are still in their graves.
Compared to the words of the old men, my own words are so light. I would rather keep my mouth shut than speak in such light words.
But still, someone has to take over. I realize that even my words, which are so light, are only the top of the voices that are left in this world to carry on the story of the atomic bombing.
I know how it feels to think that I am the only one. Still, I hope that you will not shut your mouth. I know that I have closed my mouth because I thought I shouldn't talk about it, and that is the result.
Sometimes I almost choose to stop imagining the unimaginable suffering and live my life consuming other people's suffering for fun.
I am writing this while I still have some imagination of the suffering of the old people whose voices, faces, and even words I can no longer recall.
すまん。勝手に翻訳した。拡散はどうするかな。redditとかに投稿するのがいいのか?
----
I have seen some posts asking if they should talk about "the case" even though they were not involved in it and were not born in Nagasaki or Hiroshima, and I am a bit aware of it, so I have to say what I have to say. I say this because I was born in Nagasaki, am a third generation atomic bomb survivor, and grew up hearing the stories of those who experienced the atomic bombing firsthand. I know it's a little bit too much for me, but I'm going to say this because there are very few survivors left.
In Nagasaki, children grow up hearing stories about the atomic bombing. They were stuffed into sushi for nearly an hour in the gymnasium of an elementary school in the middle of summer, with no air conditioner or fan, and told stories about the atomic bombing. That was a hard time for me. I think it must have been even harder for the old people who told the stories, but there was no way an elementary school kid could imagine such a thing, and I had forgotten most of the stories I had been told for a long time. I have forgotten most of the stories I was told. I can only remember one or two at most. There is one more hard thing. Every year around this time, a row of grotesque images that would drive the PTA crazy in other areas are prominently displayed in the hallways. These days, I hear that the atomic bomb museum has been bleached out and many of the radical and horrifying exhibits that traumatized visitors have been taken down. I don't know if they are still there, but they were there when I was in elementary school.
There was one photo that I just couldn't face when I was in elementary school. It is a picture of Sumiteru Taniguchi. If you search for it, you can find it. It is a shocking picture, but I would like you to take a look at it. I couldn't pass through the hallway where the photo was posted, so I always took the long way around to another floor of the school building to avoid seeing the photo.
Now I'm thinking that my grandfather, who headed into the burnt ruins to look for his sister, couldn't have turned away or taken a different path. There would have been a mountain of people still alive and moaning, not just pictures, and a mountain more who would have given up at the end of their suffering. He walked for miles and miles, towing his handcart through the narrow streets of rubble-strewn Nagasaki in search of his sister. My grandfather was not a child at the time, but of course there were children who did similar things. Not that there wouldn't have been. There were. I heard the story from him, and I still remember it. A young brother and sister found their father's body in the ruins of a fire and they burned it. They didn't have enough wood to burn his body, and when they saw the raw brain that spilled out, they ran away and that was the last time they ever saw him anymore.
I can never forget the story I heard when I was a kid, and even now it is painful and painful, my hands are shaking and I am crying. I keep wondering how the old man who escaped from that father's brain could have been able to unravel the most horrible trauma imaginable and expose it to the public with scars that will never heal.
Now I think I can understand a little.
The reason I can't help but talk about my grandfather and that old man, even if I have to rehash my own trauma, is that this level of suffering is nothing compared to the fact that their words will be forgotten. My hands shaking, my heart palpitating and dizzy, my nose running with tears, it's nothing compared to the tremendous suffering that was once there and will be forgotten.
My grandfather, who went through an unimaginable hell, lived to see his grandchildren born, and met his sister's death in the ruins of the fire. In other words, my grandfather was one of the happiest people in the ruins of the fire. My grandfather and that old man were, after all, just people wading in the depths of hell. I think that the suffering that even people who had experienced unimaginable pain could not imagine was lying like pebbles in Nagasaki 78 years ago, and no one paid any attention to it. Their suffering, which I can't even imagine, is nothing compared to the countless, tremendous suffering they witnessed, which they pretend never happened.
Memories fade inexorably every time people talk about them. The memories that those people could not allow to be forgotten are now largely forgotten; the tremendous suffering of 78 years ago is mostly gone, never to be recounted again. Those who suffered the most from the atomic bombing died rotting in the ruins of the fire, unable to tell anyone about it. Many of those who saw it with their own eyes kept their mouths shut and took it with them to their graves. Most of those who spoke a few words are now under the grave.
Compared to the words of the old men, my own words are so light. I would rather keep my mouth shut than speak in such light words. But still, someone has to take over. I realize that even my words, which are so light, are only the top of the voices that are left in this world to carry on the story of the atomic bombing. I know how it feels to wonder if someone like myself is allowed to speak about this. Still, I hope that you will not shut your mouth. This is the result of our silence.
Sometimes I almost choose to stop imagining the unimaginable suffering and live my life consuming other people's suffering for the fun of it. I am writing this while I still have some imagination of the suffering of the old people whose voices, faces, and even words I can no longer recall.
Translator's note: The original post in Japanese is a response to a post by a Japanese contributor who wondered if he was qualified to speak out on the subject of the A-bomb when he was not from Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but still spoke out about Barbie and the A-bomb. I translated it here because I think it deserves to be read by the world.
I must talk about various things regarding the Barbie incident.
I saw a post about it from someone who is neither directly involved nor from Nagasaki or Hiroshima, and it made me realize that there are things I must say.
I was born in Nagasaki and grew up listening to stories from the survivors, being a third-generation survivor myself. Most survivors are no longer with us, so I feel compelled to speak up.
In Nagasaki, kids grow up hearing about the atomic bomb. We were packed like sushi in a gymnasium without air conditioning or even fans during the scorching summer, and we listened to stories about the bomb. It was incredibly tough for me.
I imagine it was even harder for the elderly who spoke about their experiences. As a child, I couldn't fully comprehend their pain, and now, I can hardly remember most of the stories I heard. I can only recall one or two.
Every year during this time, gruesome images that would make PTA elsewhere go crazy were displayed in the hallways. I heard that many of the horrifying exhibits that used to traumatize visitors at the Atomic Bomb Museum have been removed, and the museum has been considerably sanitized. I'm not sure about the current situation, but that's how it was when I was there.
There was one photograph that I could never bear to look at as a child – a picture of Tadashi Taniguchi. You can find it if you search, but it's a shocking image with a viewer discretion warning. Still, I want people to see it.
I couldn't walk down the hallway where that photo was displayed, and I always took a different route, avoiding it so I wouldn't have to see it.
Now, I think of my grandpa who went to the ruins to search for my sister. He couldn't look away or take a different path. The pain must have been unimaginable.
Besides photographs, there were many living people moaning in pain back then, and there must have been even more who succumbed to suffering.
My grandpa walked for miles, pulling a handcart through the debris-laden streets of Nagasaki, searching for my sister.
Even though my grandpa was not a child, I'm sure there were elementary school kids who did similar things. I don't just think they might have been there; they were there. I heard the stories from the people themselves, and I still remember them.
I can't forget the stories I heard as a child, such as the young siblings finding their father's burnt corpse in the ruins and cremating him. They didn't have enough firewood, and their father ended up half-burnt. They ran away after seeing the brain tissue oozing out, and that became their final farewell.
I can never forget those stories I heard as a child, and even now, they still bring pain and suffering, making my hands tremble and tears flow.
I wonder how my grandpa, who ran away from that father's brain tissue, could expose his unimaginable trauma and everlasting scars to the world.
Now, I feel like I understand a little.
Even someone like me, who experienced such unimaginable trauma, has gone through pain that I can't even imagine being compared to being discarded, forgotten, and ignored. Compared to what those people experienced, my suffering means nothing.
My trembling hands and the palpitations and dizziness I experienced are nothing compared to the tremendous pain that many others went through.
Memories fade irreversibly every time they pass through people's lips. The memories that I couldn't bear to be forgotten are almost forgotten now.
The unimaginable pain that existed 78 years ago has mostly disappeared, and we can no longer pass it on.
The people who suffered the most from the atomic bomb perished in the ruins, rotting away without being able to convey it to anyone.
Even those who saw it with their own eyes mostly took the memories with them to their graves. Most of them are now under the tombstones.
Compared to the words of the elderly, my words seem so light. I think that speaking with such light words would be better than keeping silent, as silence has led to this result.
I feel like I might occasionally choose to stop imagining the unimaginable pain and consume the suffering of others in an amusing way to live on.
Before I forget the pain and suffering of those elderly people, whose faces and voices I can no longer recall, I will leave this here.
日本人女性の写真を生成するプロンプトについて私なりに試行錯誤した結果を示します。
画像は4つ以下に貼り付けました。
約2週間経過しているため、既に何らかの結論を得られているかもしれませんが、どなたかの参考にでもなれば幸いです。
actressを付けると安定すると書かれていましたが、正にその通りだと思います。
actressだけでなく、2つの言葉を重ねると表情や顔の作りが安定するように思います。
例として
actress×Japanese idol
AKB48 × a famous Japanese girl in Instagram
などです。
今回のpromptで、日本人を示す言葉はこの部分くらいだったのですがそれなりに日本人ぽくなっていると思います。（ちなみにAKB48とnogizaka46で素人目に大きな差は出ませんでした。）
また結果(1)と(2)に含まれているAya Kodaのように適当に女性の名前を入れると結果が安定する傾向も見られました。
（私は適当に、北条政子、幸田文など、歴史上の女性名を使ってみましたが特にその名前の方々の特徴が取り入れられている訳ではなさそうです）
結果(3)は特定の名前を使わない代わりに、女性らしさが出るかと思ってmuscular arm, cleavage of breasts, detailedなどを入れています。
CFG scaleは5～22で振ってみましたが、数値を大きくしすぎると光を強く当てたようなギラついた雰囲気になるようです。
（なお、自然光を当てた写真にするため、「on the beach」としましたので室内の設定だと異なると思います）
STEPは100にしてもそれほど良い結果にならなかったため40～70にしています。
使用しているツールは、下記のstable-diffusion-webui（by Automatic1111）です。
https://github.com/AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui
なお本稿では以降stable-diffusion-webuiと記載します。
「Restore faces」と「Highres,fix」はONにした状態とし、Samplerは「Euler a」を基本としています。
stable-diffusion-webui（Automatic1111）の機能については下記をご参照ください。
https://github.com/AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui/wiki/Features
「Highres,fix」がその一助になると思いますのでもしお使いで無ければお試しください。
◆prompt:
Photo of a young female wearing a T-shirt and jeans, Aya Koda, (((beauty bright eyes))), cute face, Angel face, short hair, small nose, on the beach, ((perfect face)), detailed, photorealistic, cute slight smile, Medium Shot, actress, Japanese idol,
◆Negative prompt:
ugly, fat, obese, chubby, (((deformed))), [blurry], bad anatomy, disfigured, poorly drawn face, mutation, mutated, (extra_limb), (ugly), (poorly drawn hands), messy drawing, penis, nose, eyes, lips, eyelashes, text, red_eyes, (((nipples))),(skinny), (((underbite))), long jaw, long hair,
Steps: 70, Sampler: Euler a, CFG scale: 6.5, Seed: 18523803, Face restoration: GFPGAN, Size: 576x768, Denoising strength: 0.4
◆prompt:
Photo of a young female wearing a T-shirt and jeans, Aya Koda, (((beauty bright eyes))), cute face, Angel face, short hair, small nose, on the beach, ((perfect face)), detailed, photorealistic, cute slight smile, Medium Shot, actress, Japanese idol,
◆Negative prompt:
ugly, fat, obese, chubby, (((deformed))), [blurry], bad anatomy, disfigured, poorly drawn face, mutation, mutated, (extra_limb), (ugly), (poorly drawn hands), messy drawing, penis, nose, eyes, lips, eyelashes, text, red_eyes, (((nipples))),(skinny), (((underbite))), long jaw, long hair,
Steps: 50, Sampler: Euler a, CFG scale: 16, Seed: 1585211664, Face restoration: GFPGAN, Size: 576x768, Denoising strength: 0.4
◆prompt:
portrait of an attractive talent wearing a T-shirt and jeans, (((beauty bright eyes))), cute face with elegant hairstyle, face to the left, on the beach, ((perfect face)), muscular arm, cleavage of breasts, detailed, intricate, photorealistic, a famous Japanese girl in Instagram, cute slight smile, Medium Shot, akb48, Japanese idol,
◆Negative prompt:
ugly, fat, obese, chubby, (((deformed))), [blurry], bad anatomy, disfigured, poorly drawn face, mutation, mutated, (extra_limb), (ugly), (poorly drawn hands), messy drawing, penis, nose, eyes, lips, eyelashes, text, red_eyes, (((nipples))),(skinny)
Steps: 55, Sampler: Euler a, CFG scale: 9, Seed: 3339383866, Face restoration: GFPGAN, Size: 576x768, Denoising strength: 0.25
※これはsamplerとCFG Scale についての比較用です。
◆prompt:
Photo of a young female wearing a T-shirt and jeans, (((beauty bright eyes))), cute face, Angel face, short hair, small nose, on the beach, ((perfect face)), detailed, photorealistic, cute slight smile, Medium Shot, actress, Japanese idol,
◆Negative prompt:
ugly, fat, obese, chubby, (((deformed))), [blurry], bad anatomy, disfigured, poorly drawn face, mutation, mutated, (extra_limb), (ugly), (poorly drawn hands), messy drawing, penis, nose, eyes, lips, eyelashes, text, red_eyes, (((nipples))),(skinny), (((underbite))),
Steps: 70, Sampler: Euler a, CFG scale: 5.0, Seed: 1729711779, Face restoration: GFPGAN, Size: 512x768
Negative promptは以下くらいに省略しても問題は無さそうです。
ugly, fat, obese, chubby, (((deformed))), bad anatomy, disfigured, poorly drawn face, mutation, mutated
ただしpromptもNegative promptは、あまりシンプルにし過ぎるとハズレ率が高くなるかもしれません。
またseedを固定してCFG Scaleを変えた方が効果が出るケースも多いような気がしています。
結果(3)の「talent」の部分は、適当に職業名に変えても成立しました。
もう少し早く投稿したかったのですが、色々やっているうちにあっという間に時間が経ってしまいました。
また、日本人（というかモンゴロイド）に多い頬骨が張っていない丸顔を作るのは結構難しいと感じました。
以上
まどマギ…それほどどいつもこいつもまどマギまどマギ言ってた印象無い
あの絵柄だし、アニメ見る習慣ある人以外は見る人を選ぶ作品だと思うし(内容は言うに及ばず)
あの花やタイバニやおそ松…全く「社会現象」にはなってないと思う
「アニメ好き以外に訴求して数十年経っても語る輩が居る作品」が社会現象と言うにふさわしいと思う
ついでに言えば「10年単位で燃料(新作)投入されるから話題長持ち」ってのも社会現象アニメの特徴かな
KalafinaのMagiaは名曲だけど、世間の人間が知ってるか?っていうと知らないと思う
オリオンをなぞるもSIX SAME FACESも良いけど以下同文
「ざーんこーくなてんしのよおにーしょーおーねーんよしんわになーれー」なんて、世界で一番歌われた曲じゃねーかってくらい知名度高いよね
まあ、曲自体が良くてキャッチーだったから「作品見てないけど曲知ってる」って人も多かったかもしれないが
そんな作品て他にあるかねえ。エヴァ以前なら松本零士系が「アニメファン以外への訴求力に富んでいた」イメージだ
「ガンダム」という作品名を知らない80代未満の日本人てそんなに居ないだろうけど、見たかどうかってなるとなあ?
エヴァ以後ってなると…余計思いつかん
というか、分かりやすく「エヴァ芸人」は居ても「タイバニ芸人」「おそ松芸人」は居ないと思う(人数が集まらない)
…「まどマギ芸人」は結構集まるだろうけど…アメトーク成立するかなあ?
senbuu氏の右往左往はともかく、ゲキサカの誤訳は事実なので、書き残しておきたい。
スタッフがテレビの設定などを行う中、デンベレが「こんな醜い顔を並べて、恥ずかしくないのか」「どんな後進国の言葉なんだ」「お前の国は技術的に進んでいるのか、いないのか」などと発言したという。
しかし当初の記事は、デンベレの発言をこのように紹介していた。
スタッフがテレビの設定などを行う中、デンベレが「こんな醜い顔をして恥ずかしくないのか」「どんな後進国の言葉なんだ」「お前の国は技術的に進んでいるのか、いないのか」などと発言したという。
https://archive.md/20210703222708/https://web.gekisaka.jp/news/detail/?335703-335703-fl
「恥ずかしくないのか」は同僚に向けられた言葉であることは、YouTubeの仏人によっても指摘されている。
デンベレは、日本人の顔について「恥ずかしくないのか」と言った訳ではない。
修正後の「醜い顔を並べて」もだいぶ意味不明なのだが、分からない程度に修正したということだろうか。
辻氏が槍玉にあげたデイリーメールですら、「All these ugly faces, just so you can play PES, aren't you ashamed?(この醜い顔、たかがお前がPESをプレイするだけのためなんだぞ。お前恥ずかしくないのか？)」としていて、日本人に向けて「醜い顔して恥ずかしくないのか？」と言ったのではない。
前者と後者ではだいぶ印象が違う。訂正前の誤訳を見て噴き上がった人も多かったのではないか。
「なんて醜い顔なんだ。恥ずかしくないのか？」
としている。
https://www.iza.ne.jp/article/20210706-Q5QL54SNQBHVLMC77MIP4BBWZA/
人種差別的発言に怒るのは分かるが、これだけ誤訳が出回ったまま放置は信じ難い。
経緯としては、デイリーメールによって、2019年にバルサが来日した際に以下の様な動画が撮影され、その内容が問題であることを報じられた事に始まった問題だけど
デンベレ選手やグリーズマン選手らを処罰して個人の意識の問題にすることに違和感を感じている、と言う話。
個人的には、両選手が日本人を特別に嘲笑って差別しているという風には感じなかったけど、問題の根はもっと深くてエグイなとも感じた。
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xgZJC6QAZgA
フランス語の以下の英訳が差別的な発言であるという印象を強めている。
スラング入りなので意訳してみると
「この連中は何だ？お前がPESを遊べるようにするためにいるのか？そんなことの為に、こんな連中呼んではずかしくねぇのかよ？」、この連中を直訳して醜い顔の連中と置き換えるとセンセーションではある。
「は？何言ってんだか分からねぇよ」、どんな遅れた言葉だよ、って直訳するとヤバさは際立ちますね。
「お前らはこの国じゃ技術のある人間じゃないのかよ？」、これは直訳も糞もなく字義通りでしょう。
俺の最初の印象としては、「なんだ？このガキは。癇癪起こしてんじゃねぇよ」って感じだったけど、世論は一気に吹き上がった感があって不思議ではあった。
辻氏だけではなく複数のフランス語話者が、意図的な誤訳が含まれるという点を指摘しているけれど、俺は英語は使えてもフランス語は全く分からんので真偽の判定は難しい。DeelL翻訳で英語にしてみる。
フランス語の抜出を辻氏が嘘をついてる可能性も考えないではないが、公開されている映像で、辻仁成ほど名の知れた人がそれをやる意味が見いだせないので内容は信じたい。
Toutes ces sales gueules pour jouer un PES bordel! Ils n’ont pas honte?
All these ugly faces to play a PES damn! Don't they have any shame?
「この醜い連中はPESを遊ぶ為にいる、恥ずかしくないのか？」醜い顔が恥ずかしいと言ってる様な文脈にはとても思えない。
https://www.designstoriesinc.com/jinsei/daily-1980/
これは日本で起こったことですが、世界のどこで起こってもおかしくないことであり、場所に関係なく同じ言葉を使っていたと思います。特定のコミュニティに向けたものではありません
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/b2ec34c371d23a3bc97547d6028d4d728f48906e
と言っているけれど、俺はこの発言は言い逃れやいい訳ではなくて、本当にそうなのだろうと思った。
理由は、経緯をおいつつ発言の内容を英語で理解しようとした時に、デンベレ選手は「作業がスムーズに進まないで、要求が満たされない事にキレ散らかしてる」としか思えなかったからだ。
あの場面で、作業をしている人にフランス語話者がいれば酷い罵倒に取られる訳で、いかに職業意識が高い日本人でも、要求にスマートに答えられない申し訳なさよりも怒りが勝つかもしれない。
それくらいリスペクトに欠けた言葉遣いだったことは疑いないけど、差別のつもりではなかったってのは、そうなのだろうと理解はした。
今分かる事は、日本人に対して差別の意識があるかどうかはともかくとして、デンベレ選手自身は、汚いスラングを使って日常的に会話する人であるという事だろう。
サッカー選手はジネディーヌ・ジダン氏からして、デンベレ選手同様に移民の子であり、犯罪率も高いスラムの様な場所で育ちサッカー選手としての才能と努力でのし上がって来た成功者が多い。
ブラジル人だと、毎日誰かが殺されるようなスラムから抜け出す事が出来て嬉しい、と言うようなことを来日した選手がいっていることはよくある。そして、彼らは家族や仲間への愛情がひときわ強い。
欧州に今もなお健在の階級の壁を才能によって超えたとはいっても、彼らの育ったバックグラウンドが消える訳じゃない。地元に戻って友達と話せば、上品な言葉ではなく、スラング交じりのカッコつけた言葉で話するだろう。
日本でも、ほとんど耳にすることもないけれど、ヤンキーが、サツカンとか、ポリとか警察を呼ぶような俗語があった。今も不良少年の間で、俗語が使われてるかは知らんけど、世界中のどこにでもあるだろう。
日本の不良少年は大人になり社会に出るとそういう俗語は捨てる（だけの教養は自然と備わる）が、同じような立場の選手も多いサッカー選手同士だと、そんな話し方が常態化してるのかもしれない。
フランスの中で放置され、隔絶され、隠されてる貧困層の文化を持った青年が、選手として成功する事で、地元の仲間内では普通の文化を表社会に見せてしまう事があるという事なんだろう。
フランス人も含めて世界中で、これは差別だと一斉に叩いているけれど、欧米人お得意のポリコレこん棒の過剰な振り回しの側面は否めないと思う。
同時に、フランスの恥部に向き合う事なく、選手個人の問題にして切り離そうとしてるのが更に酷い問題に思えた。
社会に存在する階級の差を放置したまま、ポリコレこん棒で叩いて表立った問題は起こさない様にしたところで、本当の差別は消えないだろう。
貧しいものは、自分たちの仕事を奪う移民を嫌うのは、昨今の欧米の時事を追えば誰にでもわかることだ。そこから差別が生まれ続ける。
デンベレ選手の問題を個人の恥ずべき行動だと切り離して、階級の差から目を背けている間は、フランスの社会が差別をなくすことなんて200％出来ないなと強く思う。
スラングが表に出てくるのが嫌なら、階級の差をなくして、移民差別黒人差別も無くして、きちんと教育して社会に送り出せ。これは、ただのフランスの恥でしかないし、日本人が付き合って怒ってやるのも馬鹿らしい話だ。
https://twitter.com/DabadieTV/status/1412191937495388160
フローラン・ダバディ氏が、本質的なところでは同意見だということで、ほらなと言う感じだ。
フランスが目を背けて逃げてる移民・黒人との階級の差が、成功によって日の目を見てるだけなのだ。十分な教育が行き届いてない事実が見えるだけだ。
ちなみに仏ハフポストは読んでみた？
ハフポストですら、「こんな醜い顔をして恥ずかしくないのか」のような愚かな誤訳はしていないんだが。ただ、表現が断片的でよく分からない。
そして確かにデイリーメールも、「All these ugly faces, just so you can play PES, aren't you ashamed?」とやはり醜い顔＝恥、という誤訳の元を作り出してるが、
それでも「PESをプレイできるようにするために」という決定的な一文が入っている。
醜いってのは、アジア人特有の風貌を言ってるんじゃないんだよ。
必死こいてる姿を嘲笑してるだけだ。そこに人種差別があったかは、本人にしか分からんだろ？
まあ最大の誤訳は、その一文、『just so you can play PES(たかだかPESをプレイするだけのために)』をゲキサカが抜いて「こんな醜い顔をして恥ずかしくないのか」と一直線に繋げた点だろうな。
いずれにしても、「Toutes ces sales gueules pour jouer un PES bordel!」と「Ils ne sont pas hontes?」を繋げて「こんな醜い顔をして恥ずかしくないのか」とするのは、誤訳以外の何物でもない。
こうして比較してみると、"radioactive water" はどちらかと言えば強い方の表現だなと思った。
contaminated Fukushima water, contaminated water
Japan says it will release more than one million tonnes of contaminated water from the ruined Fukushima nuclear power station back into the sea, in a decision that drew swift condemnation from China, South Korea and environmental groups and is likely to anger the fishing industry.
ttps://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/4/13/japan-to-release-contaminated-fukushima-water-into-sea
Fukushima radioactive water, contaminated water
Japan to announce Fukushima radioactive water release into sea
Tokyo appears set to formally announce its final decision on the release of contaminated water from its wrecked Fukushima nuclear power plant into the sea.
ttp://www.arirang.com/News/News_View.asp?nSeq=275277
wastewater, contaminated water
Japan has approved a plan to release more than one million tonnes of contaminated water from the destroyed Fukushima nuclear plant into the sea.
ttps://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-56728068
treated Fukushima water, contaminated water
Japan to release treated Fukushima water into the sea: PM Yoshihide Suga
The Japanese government plans to release more than 1 million tonnes of contaminated water from the destroyed Fukushima nuclear plant into the ocean, Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga said on Tuesday (Apr 13), in a controversial decision that follows years of debate.
ttps://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/japan-fukushima-nuclear-plant-water-sea-yoshihide-suga-14610968
Fukushima wastewater, radioactive water
Japan determined to release Fukushima wastewater despite backlash
Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga said on Monday that the disposal of radioactive water from the crippled Fukushima nuclear power plant cannot be postponed amid plans to rebuild the plant, despite the looming backlash from both home and abroad, broadcaster NHK reported.
ttps://news.cgtn.com/news/2021-04-12/The-plan-to-release-Fukushima-wastewater-sparks-backlash-ZoFTbhBjG0/index.html
treated Fukushima water, treated radioactive water
Japan to start releasing treated Fukushima water into sea in 2 years
Japan will start releasing more than 1 million metric tons of treated radioactive water from its destroyed Fukushima nuclear plant into the ocean in two years, the government said Tuesday -- a plan that faces opposition at home and has raised "grave concern" in neighboring countries.
ttps://edition.cnn.com/2021/04/12/asia/japan-fukushima-water-intl-hnk/index.html
radioactive water
Fukushima: South Korea summons Japan's envoy over dumping decision
The Japanese government has approved a controversial plan to release radioactive water from the wrecked Fukushima nuclear plant into the ocean. South Korea expressed 'strong regret' over the decision.
ttps://www.dw.com/en/fukushima-south-korea-summons-japans-envoy-over-dumping-decision/a-57177353
Japan to dump contaminated water from Fukushima nuclear station into sea
Japan plans to release into the sea more than 1 million tonnes of contaminated water from the destroyed Fukushima nuclear station, the government said on Tuesday.
ttps://www.france24.com/en/asia-pacific/20210413-japan-to-release-contaminated-water-from-fukushima-nuclear-station-into-sea
Japan's Prime Minister Suga Yoshihide says a decision on how to dispose of treated water from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant should not be put off.
ttps://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/news/20210412_18/
irradiated water, Contaminated wastewater
Japanese government says it WILL release irradiated water from Fukushima nuclear plant into the sea
Contaminated wastewater at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant will be released into the ocean “in around two years,” the Japanese government has announced, despite calls from China and South Korea urging against the move.
ttps://www.rt.com/news/520856-fukushima-contaminated-water-release/
人数の数だけ考え方はあるよ。
みんなで意見を言い合うと
他の人と同じで良いですって、感じになるけど
一人一人カウンセリングしたら、
同じ質問に答えはそれぞれ違っているそう。
おまけ。
男の子って何で出来てる？
男の子って何で出来てる？
男の子って、それらで出来てる。
女の子って何で出来てる？
女の子って何で出来てる？
女の子って、それらで出来てる。
男の人って何で出来てる？
男の人って何で出来てる？
ため息と流し目と嘘の涙
男の人って、それらで出来てる。
女の人って何で出来てる？
女の人って何で出来てる？
女の人って、それらで出来てる。
What are little boys made of, made of?
Frogs and snails
And puppy-dog's tails,
That's what little boys are made of.
What are little girls made of, made of?
What are little girls made of?
That's what little girls are made of.
What are young men made of, made of?
What are young men made of?
Sighs and leers
And crocodile tears,
That's what young men are made of.
What are young women made of, made of?
What are young women made of?
Ribbons and laces
That's what young men are made of.
Oxford Nursery Rhyme Book
https://ameblo.jp/fathergoose/entry-11412492413.html
さまより。
マザーグース懐かしすぎる。
The 100 Most Handsome Faces of 2019 - https://t.co/l8yb4vmtOq
-- OUT NOW!!!— TC Candler (@tccandler) December 30, 2019
http://anond.hatelabo.jp/20100327202020 のブコメが盛り上がっているのを見て便乗したくなった。
ピアソン・エデュケーション発行『C++プログラミング【第二版】vol.1』 asin:489471115X という本のP206～207に、次のような文章がある。
定数変数は名前付き定数もしくは読み出し専用変数と呼ばれることがあります。お気づきのように、「定数変数」という用語は、「小さな大根」や「冷凍焼け」などと同様に形容矛盾です（あなたが気に入っている形容矛盾があったら、まえがきに挙げた筆者らの電子メールアドレスに送ってください。よろしく！）
この本は訳書でオリジナルの英文ではなんと書かれていたかは調べていない。「小さな大根」や「冷凍焼け」は訳者が考えた日本語の形容矛盾だろう。
もっとないか考えてみた。
「裏表紙」…同じ本を読んでいる同僚に話したら「表紙の表というのは表面と内部という対立を表すもので、裏というのは背面と前面という別の対立を表すものだから、矛盾しないのではないか」と熱っぽく反論された。
「若年寄」…筒井康隆の『色眼鏡の狂想曲』（ asin:4122025168 所収）という短編で指摘されていた。
「変光恒星」…「変光星」とだけ言うことが多そうだけど、検索したら少しはあったのでコレクションに加える。
「新古車」…これも普通に「未使用車」ということのほうが多いかもしれないが一応。
「新規解約」 …はてなキーワードに項目がある http://d.hatena.ne.jp/keyword/%BF%B7%B5%AC%B2%F2%CC%F3
「黒朱肉」…増田 http://anond.hatelabo.jp/20140423112348 から仕入れた。検索したら「黒肉〔こくにく〕」というのもあったが通じるのか？
「緑茶」「紅茶」…増田と言えばこんなのもあった http://anond.hatelabo.jp/20150717224315
その他、地名がらみでいっぱいあるかもしれない。「西東京市」とか「南北海道」とか。東北地方の南西部を「南西東北」と言ったら一見ではなんのことかわからない。
英語では、「チャーリーとチョコレート工場」の原作の小説に"Squair Candies That Looks Round"というのが出てくる。講談社英語文庫版 asin:4770028407 だとp131～132だ。
日本語に翻訳不可能なので、英語がわかるやつだけ読んで楽しんでくれ。
"Oh, do shut up," said Mr.Wonka. "Now watch this!" He took a key from his pocket, and unlocked the door and flung it open...and suddenly...at the sound of the door opening, all the rows and rows of little square candies looked quickly round to see who was coming in. The tiny faces actually turned toward the door and stared at Mr.Wonka.
"There you are!" he cried triumphantly. "They're looking round! There's no argument about it! They are square candies that look round!"
http://anond.hatelabo.jp/20130514083636
慰安婦問題について個人的な印象を書いたら、それなりに読んでいただけたようだ。読んでくださった方には心から感謝したい。
私の増田に対する反応を見ながら、ついでに橋下の発言に対する Twitter 上の反応を見ていると、「橋下を批判する『左翼』」への反感から、ちょっといかがなものかと思われる議論が散見された。
つまり現実には、危惧したように、「右翼と左翼の党派の議論」にしっかりと落とし込まれてしまっているわけだ。
そこで、慰安婦問題から離れるが、いかがなものかと思われた点をいくつか書き留めておきたい。
本編に入る前に一言だけ、私の増田に対するコメントで気になったものについて反応しておくと、案の定「自称中立」「他人事」等といったご批判を賜った。
もちろん、私にはそういうつもりはなく、むしろその逆で、普段から水商売の女性たちに対する日本の男の視線があまりにもひどいことに憤りを覚えているような人間なので、その延長線であの増田を書いた。したがって、私は喜んで慰安婦の方々や現在の売春婦たちに頭を下げたいと思うものの一人である。（追記 「日本の男の視線」と書いたがこれは誤りで、男女問わず水商売の女性に対する視線がひどいと書くべきであった）
さて、橋下市長の米軍司令官に対する発言と司令官の反応について、米国と日本の文化の差、性倫理の違いやキリスト教の影響を使って理解しようとする向きが少なからずあるように見受けられた。
米軍と売春の関係については、ロイターによる次のような興味深い記事があった。昨年、クリントン国務長官がコロンビアを訪れた際に、シークレットサービスたちが売春婦と遊んだ一件が表沙汰になった話に関する記事だ。事件を覚えておられる方もいるだろう。
U.S. military faces scrutiny over its prostitution policies | Reuters
全部翻訳するわけにはいかないので適当にまとめると、この一件では、シークレットサービスは即刻帰国させられたり処分を受けたりしたそうだが、関与したらしい軍の隊員たちは「門限破り」のためにコロンビアに止め置かれ軍によって調査されたようだ。しかし、どうなっているか情報がなかなか出てこない。 上院軍事委員会筆頭理事であるマケイン上院議員が国防総省に「提供された情報が少なすぎる」と言って突っつかなければならなかった。
実は米軍が売春に対して以前よりもきわめて厳格になったのは、2005年、ブッシュ大統領がある大統領令にサインしてからだ。それ以降、売春がたとえ合法の土地であっても売春婦と接触することは許されないものになった。この大統領令によれば、もし違反すれば牢屋送りにもなりかねない。このように厳しい規則になっている理由は、売春は人身売買と深く関係し、あるいは他の犯罪にも絡みかねないという要素が大きいからだ。
（この辺の解説は次のリンクが詳しいか。 Prostitution now punishable under UCMJ）
ところが、ロイターの記事に元将校 Lawrence Korb のコメントがあるが、こんな厳しい大統領令なのに、
牢屋に入った者を見たことがない。共和党上院議員でマケイン議員と同じく上院軍事委員会 の Lindsey Graham も、
he doubts that the military is enforcing its strict prostitution rules.
"The honest truth is probably no," said Graham, a former Air Force lawyer.
軍が厳しい規則を順守している点を疑っていると言い、「本当のところはおそらく "no" だろう」と。
つまり、軍としては厳しい規則のもとで売春婦と接触することを禁止しているし教育もしているが、現実の運用に際してはなかなか難しいところで「抜け道」や「黙認」を全否定もできない、というところだろうか。
さて、ここで話を戻すと、橋下市長が沖縄の米軍司令官に「風俗」の活用を提案したところ、司令官が「米軍では禁止の通達を出している。これ以上、この話はやめよう」と言ったのは、こうして見てみるとごく当たり前の話であって、別に文化や倫理観の差によるものでも何でもないことは明白だろう。単純に規則がそうなっているからであり、その規則もとり立ててアメリカ文化やキリスト教の倫理観に依存したものとは思われない。むしろ、世界中で展開している米軍が倫理的に厳格であろうとすることは、非常に理解しやすいところであって、橋下からこんな話をされた司令官は「俺の出世の邪魔をする気か」「こう答える以外に答えようがないじゃねぇか、バカ野郎」くらいのことは思ったのではなかろうか。
また、「現実の話をして何が悪い」と開き直った意見も全くの筋違いであることが理解できるはずだ。そういう問題ではないのである。
米軍の司令官相手に、こんな提案をした橋下が単純に愚劣だとしか言いようがない。
さて第二点として、「売春と日本の『風俗』は違う」という橋下の言い訳を是認する人を何人も見かけた。しかし、少し考えてもらえば、法律上、あるいは表向きはどうあれ、その差にことさらに意味を求めるのはナンセンスであり、現実にはその境目は非常にあいまいだ、ということはすぐ分かると思う。
ピンサロのようなものならまだしも、裸の男女が密着し、「性交以外何でもアリ」で口淫はもちろんのこと、アナルセックスが可能な店まであるうえ、場合によっては性交になる、あるいは女性に直接いくばくか支払えば性交できてしまうことすらある。ソープランドは言うまでもない。
それになにより、軍隊生活を営んでいる屈強な米兵がもしも風俗嬢に性交を強要した場合、どうなるか。橋下や彼に理解を示す人たちには想像力が決定的に欠如していると言わざるを得ない。
さらに、ここでも日本と「欧米」の違いの問題に持ち込もうとする人がいるようだが、もちろんそういう問題では全然ない。
日本の「風俗」は売春と違うという議論は、現実を反映していない単なる詭弁であり、「だからどうした」と言うよりほかない。
第三点に、「まあでも、政治家などが公にこのような『風俗』のことを議論するのはふさわしくないよね」という意見も見かけた。しかしこれは時と場合、あるいは国による。
例えばドイツの例を見てみると、2002年にSPDと緑の党による左派系連立政権が、地位・待遇改善のために、売春婦が労働契約を結べるようにしたそうだ（ただ、結果は以前とあまり変わりはなかったらしい）。また、売春にかかる税があり、行政が徴収しているようでもある。
Prostitution in Germany - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
ドイツの売春宿は、総じて衛生的で、病気に対する警戒心が、日本とは比べ物にならないように思う。日本のヘルスなどの場合、狭い間仕切りに、シャワーなどがあり、常に湿度が高い環境のなかに女の子たちが押し込められていたりすることが少なくない。また、病気への警戒心は個人の意識に大きく依存していて非常に甘いのが現実だと言っていいのではないか。
公衆衛生上の観点から言っても、このような問題は決して「風俗」に行く男や風俗嬢に限った問題ではなく、広く一般の問題でもある。性感染症の拡大はむしろ「風俗」と縁のない男女のほうが深刻な一面もあるやに聞く。
であるならば、現在の風俗営業法を全面的に見直したうえで売春を広く公に認め、衛生管理を充実・徹底させることが急務である。
・・・という意見もあっていいわけであり、もし橋下市長があれだけぶっちゃけるならここまでぶっちゃけるべきであるし、彼に理解を示す人たちも徹底してぶっちゃけるべきだ。
なぜなら、「最古の商売」売春は社会の必要悪であって消失するわけがなく、であるならばちゃんと管理しようという議論にももっともな側面があり、「売春はいけない」と言っていれば済む問題では決してないからだ。
にもかかわらず、なぜか「売春はいけない」という空疎なお題目だけは橋下にしろ彼の理解者たちにしろ揃いも揃って維持されているように、私には見える。
まして、売春だかなんだか分からぬ「風俗」を、合法であるからと言って現状のまま是認し、米軍にお勧めするとは何事か。
まとめると、
１、米軍司令官がああいう反応になったのは、おそらく文化や倫理観の差の問題ではなく、現在の米軍の極めて厳格な規則ゆえであること
２、売春と「風俗」は違うという意見には意味がないだけではなく、その危険性を全く省みていないこと
３、いつものようにぶっちゃける橋下に理解を示すなら、もっと徹底してぶっちゃけて論を展開するべきであること
以上、「橋下に反対する『左翼』」への単なる反感から、橋下に理解を示す人たちについて、気になった点をいくつか書いてみた（念のために繰り返すが、私は自分では中道右派のつもりである）。
お節介ながらこういうことを書いてみたくなったのも、私だって「文化の違い」は大事にしたいものだが、安易に「文化の違い」を持ち出す議論もこれまたいかがなものかと思われたからであり、またあるいは「風俗嬢に対する愛情がないなぁ」とも感じたからだ。
そういうくだらない印象から、「そりゃあ、慰安婦問題だって世論がこれではな」という諦めに似た気持ちにつながりもするのである。
（追記）
これを書いたあとで次の記事をざっと眺めたが、米軍と売春一般や日本の「風俗」との関係について、私の理解はそう大きくずれてないようだと思ったが、いかがだろうか。
Apple on an application for a patent for the fuel cells on Thursday are exposed. In the patent application, apple describes a kind of electronic equipment, such as notebook computer use fuel cells, and without any increase in too much weight of fuel cell performance optimization method.
An application for a patent for the title as "for portable computing devices power supply of fuel cell system". Apple says, consumers are becoming more and more attention to use of renewable energy. Fuel cell in technology competitive, as the energy density high, compared with the traditional batteries can be in the same volume provide more energy.
Apple patent application show: "fuel cells and additional fuel can bring high energy density, in not adding fuel to support of portable electronic devices for days or even weeks." Apple also said, use a fuel cell is to face the challenge of portability and cost.
Usually, the fuel cells to electronic equipment support portable charging, and users need to carry a fuel rods. And this is different, have conceived a and apple electronic equipment tightly integrated fuel cell. And this one the bulk of the patent application in a description of a fuel cell stack is used to optimize the flow of energy control system.
Another apple patent application describes how the fuel cell and rechargeable batteries work together, and to make the fuel cell and rechargeable batteries charging each other. This patent application said: "it will be to make the fuel cell system not necessary to large and heavy integration of the battery, thus obviously reduce the fuel cell system size, weight and cost."
This is not the first application for apple about fuel cell patent. Patently Apple web site said, October the exposure to a patent application shows that Apple are designing a fuel panels, from portable equipment to produce more energy.
About fuel itself, apple a patent application shows that there are a variety of fuel for power electronic equipment, one of which is sodium borohydride and water mixture. But these are still at the experimental stage, has yet to commercial.
Portable fuel cell charger faces a major obstacle is that manufacturers need to establish sales channel sales and recycled fuel rods. Apple will likely use apple retail stores to have finished the work.
____________
http://www.chargerbatteryshop.co.uk/panasonic-lumix-dmc-fs62-battery-charger-cbbs.html
http://www.gobatteryonline.com/canon-powershot-a3000-is-battery-charger-gose.html
http://anond.hatelabo.jp/20091123023409
http://d.hatena.ne.jp/keyword/%BA%B4%A1%B9%CC%DA%B4%F5
-*米・最も美しい顔100
-米国映画専門サイト「インディペンデント・クリティクス」が主催する「2010年最も美しい顔100(MOST BEAUTIFUL FACES 2010)」の33位に選ばれた。日本人として初のランクイン。
--二宮和也（嵐）との熱愛報道（2011年5月）
-2010年4月に収録されたＴＢＳ系バラエティー番組「ひみつの嵐ちゃん！」にゲスト出演し、意気投合。昨年冬までに本格交際に発展した。2人は佐々木の自宅でほとんど一緒に暮らしている状態であり、事務所も交際を否定しなかった。
+これまで噂になった人物は、
+-押尾学 - 本人によるコメント無し。事務所も否定しなかった。
+-EXILEのTAKAHIRO - 本人によるコメント無し。事務所も否定しなかった。
+-杉山ハリー - 本人によるコメント無し。事務所も否定しなかった。
+-深田恭子 - 本人によるコメント無し。事務所も否定しなかった。
+-二宮和也（嵐） - 本人によるコメント無し。事務所も否定しなかった。
http://d.hatena.ne.jp/keywordlog?klid=1271485
+-西麻生バー店長Y - 本人によるコメント無し。事務所も否定しなかった。