');
The Unz Review •ï¿½An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library •ï¿½B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


�Remember My InformationWhy?
�Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Alastair Crooke Anatoly Karlin Andrew Anglin Andrew Joyce Audacious Epigone Boyd D. Cathey C.J. Hopkins E. Michael Jones Eric Margolis Eric Striker Fred Reed Gilad Atzmon Godfree Roberts Gregory Hood Guillaume Durocher Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir James Kirkpatrick James Thompson Jared Taylor John Derbyshire Jonathan Cook Jung-Freud Karlin Community Kevin Barrett Kevin MacDonald Lance Welton Larry Romanoff Laurent Guyénot Linh Dinh Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Kersey Pepe Escobar Peter Frost Philip Giraldi Razib Khan Ron Unz Steve Sailer The Saker Tobias Langdon Trevor Lynch A. Graham A. J. Smuskiewicz A Southerner Academic Research Group UK Staff Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Agha Hussain Ahmad Al Khaled Ahmet Öncü Alain De Benoist Alan Macleod Albemarle Man Alex Graham Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alexander Jacob Alexander Wolfheze Alfred McCoy Alison Weir Allan Wall Allegra Harpootlian Amalric De Droevig Ambrose Kane Amr Abozeid Anand Gopal Anastasia Katz Andre Damon Andre Vltchek Andreas Canetti Andrei Martyanov Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andrew Hamilton Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Napolitano Andrew S. Fischer Andy Kroll Angie Saxon Ann Jones Anna Tolstoyevskaya Anne Wilson Smith Anonymous Anonymous American Anonymous Attorney Anonymous Occidental Anthony Boehm Anthony Bryan Anthony DiMaggio Tony Hall Antiwar Staff Antonius Aquinas Antony C. Black Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor AudaciousEpigone Augustin Goland Austen Layard Ava Muhammad Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Kissin Barry Lando Barton Cockey Beau Albrecht Belle Chesler Ben Fountain Ben Freeman Ben Sullivan Benjamin Villaroel Bernard M. Smith Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Blake Archer Williams Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Book Brad Griffin Bradley Moore Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brett Wilkins Brian Dew Brian McGlinchey Brian R. Wright Brittany Smith C.D. Corax Cara Marianna Carl Boggs Carl Horowitz Carolyn Yeager Cat McGuire Catherine Crump César Keller Chalmers Johnson Chanda Chisala Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlie O'Neill Charlottesville Survivor Chase Madar Chauke Stephan Filho Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Chris Woltermann Christian Appy Christophe Dolbeau Christopher DeGroot Christopher Donovan Christopher Ketcham Chuck Spinney Civus Non Nequissimus CODOH Editors Coleen Rowley Colin Liddell Cooper Sterling Craig Murray Cynthia Chung D.F. Mulder Dahr Jamail Dakota Witness Dan E. Phillips Dan Sanchez Daniel Barge Daniel McAdams Daniel Vinyard Danny Sjursen Dave Chambers Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Boyajian David Bromwich David Chibo David Chu David Gordon David Haggith David Irving David L. McNaron David Lorimer David Martin David North David Stockman David Vine David Walsh David William Pear David Yorkshire Dean Baker Declan Hayes Dennis Dale Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Diego Ramos Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Dmitriy Kalyagin Donald Thoresen Alan Sabrosky Dr. Ejaz Akram Dr. Ridgely Abdul Mu’min Muhammad Dries Van Langenhove Eamonn Fingleton Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Edward Curtin Edward Dutton Egbert Dijkstra Egor Kholmogorov Ehud Shapiro Ekaterina Blinova Ellen Brown Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Emil Kirkegaard Emilio García Gómez Emma Goldman Enzo Porter Eric Draitser Eric Paulson Eric Peters Eric Rasmusen Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Gant Eugene Girin Eugene Kusmiak Eve Mykytyn F. Roger Devlin Fadi Abu Shammalah Fantine Gardinier Federale Fenster Fergus Hodgson Finian Cunningham The First Millennium Revisionist Fordham T. Smith Former Agent Forum Francis Goumain Frank Tipler Franklin Lamb Franklin Stahl Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Gary Corseri Gary Heavin Gary North Gary Younge Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Galloway George Koo George Mackenzie George Szamuely Georgianne Nienaber Gilbert Cavanaugh Gilbert Doctorow Giles Corey Glen K. Allen Glenn Greenwald A. Beaujean Agnostic Alex B. Amnestic Arcane Asher Bb Bbartlog Ben G Birch Barlow Canton ChairmanK Chrisg Coffee Mug Darth Quixote David David B David Boxenhorn DavidB Diana Dkane DMI Dobeln Duende Dylan Ericlien Fly Gcochran Godless Grady Herrick Jake & Kara Jason Collins Jason Malloy Jason�s Jeet Jemima Joel John Emerson John Quiggin JP Kele Kjmtchl Mark Martin Matoko Kusanagi Matt Matt McIntosh Michael Vassar Miko Ml Ole P-ter Piccolino Rosko Schizmatic Scorpius Suman TangoMan The Theresa Thorfinn Thrasymachus Wintz Gonzalo Lira Graham Seibert Grant M. Dahl Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Greg Klein Gregg Stanley Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Conte Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Gunnar Alfredsson Gustavo Arellano Hank Johnson Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Hans Vogel Harri Honkanen Heiner Rindermann Henry Cockburn Hewitt E. Moore Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Howe Abbot-Hiss Hua Bin Hubert Collins Hugh Kennedy Hugh McInnish Hugh Moriarty Hugo Dionísio Hunter DeRensis Hunter Wallace Huntley Haverstock Ian Fantom Igor Shafarevich Ira Chernus Ivan Kesić J. Alfred Powell J.B. Clark J.D. Gore J. Ricardo Martins Jacek Szela Jack Antonio Jack Dalton Jack Kerwick Jack Krak Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen Jake Bowyer James Bovard James Carroll James Carson Harrington James Chang James Dunphy James Durso James Edwards James Fulford James Gillespie James Hanna James J. O'Meara James K. Galbraith James Karlsson James Lawrence James Petras Jane Lazarre Jane Weir Janice Kortkamp Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Cannon Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jayant Bhandari JayMan Jean Bricmont Jean Marois Jean Ranc Jef Costello Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey D. Sachs Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jesse Mossman JHR Writers Jim Daniel Jim Fetzer Jim Goad Jim Kavanagh Jim Smith JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Dackman Joe Lauria Joel S. Hirschhorn Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Harrison Sims John Helmer John Hill John Huss John J. Mearsheimer John Jackson John Kiriakou John Macdonald John Morgan John Patterson John Leonard John Pilger John Q. Publius John Rand John Reid John Ryan John Scales Avery John Siman John Stauber John T. Kelly John Taylor John Titus John Tremain John V. Walsh John Wear John Williams Jon Else Jon Entine Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Revusky Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Sawyer Jonathan Schell Jordan Henderson Jordan Steiner Jose Alberto Nino Joseph Kay Joseph Kishore Joseph Sobran Josephus Tiberius Josh Neal Jeshurun Tsarfat Juan Cole Judith Coburn Julian Bradford Julian Macfarlane K.J. Noh Kacey Gunther Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Karl Haemers Karl Nemmersdorf Karl Thorburn Kees Van Der Pijl Keith Woods Kelley Vlahos Kenn Gividen Kenneth Vinther Kerry Bolton Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin Michael Grace Kevin Rothrock Kevin Sullivan Kevin Zeese Kshama Sawant Larry C. Johnson Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Lawrence Erickson Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Leonard C. Goodman Leonard R. Jaffee Liam Cosgrove Lidia Misnik Lilith Powell Linda Preston Lipton Matthews Liv Heide Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett Louis Farrakhan Lydia Brimelow M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maciej Pieczyński Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marco De Wit Marcus Alethia Marcus Apostate Marcus Cicero Marcus Devonshire Margaret Flowers Margot Metroland Marian Evans Mark Allen Mark Bratchikov-Pogrebisskiy Mark Crispin Miller Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Gullick Mark H. Gaffney Mark Lu Mark Perry Mark Weber Marshall Yeats Martin Jay Martin K. O'Toole Martin Webster Martin Witkerk Mary Phagan-Kean Matt Cockerill Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Caldwell Matthew Ehret Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max Jones Max North Max Parry Max West Maya Schenwar Merlin Miller Metallicman Michael A. Roberts Michael Averko Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Hoffman Michael Masterson Michael Quinn Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Michelle Malkin Miko Peled Mnar Muhawesh Moon Landing Skeptic Morgan Jones Morris V. De Camp Mr. Anti-Humbug Muhammed Abu Murray Polner N. Joseph Potts Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Nathan Cofnas Nathan Doyle Ned Stark Neil Kumar Nelson Rosit Niall McCrae Nicholas R. Jeelvy Nicholas Stix Nick Griffin Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Nicolás Palacios Navarro Nils Van Der Vegte Noam Chomsky NOI Research Group Nomi Prins Norman Finkelstein Norman Solomon OldMicrobiologist Oliver Boyd-Barrett Oliver Williams Oscar Grau P.J. Collins Pádraic O'Bannon Patrice Greanville Patrick Armstrong Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Patrick Lawrence Patrick Martin Patrick McDermott Patrick Whittle Paul Bennett Paul Cochrane Paul De Rooij Paul Edwards Paul Engler Paul Gottfried Paul Larudee Paul Mitchell Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Paul Souvestre Paul Tripp Pedro De Alvarado Peter Baggins Ph.D. Peter Bradley Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Lee Peter Van Buren Philip Kraske Philip Weiss Pierre M. Sprey Pierre Simon Povl H. Riis-Knudsen Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Qasem Soleimani Rachel Marsden Raches Radhika Desai Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ralph Raico Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Ramzy Baroud Randy Shields Raul Diego Ray McGovern Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Reginald De Chantillon Rémi Tremblay Rev. Matthew Littlefield Ricardo Duchesne Richard Cook Richard Falk Richard Foley Richard Galustian Richard Houck Richard Hugus Richard Knight Richard Krushnic Richard McCulloch Richard Silverstein Richard Solomon Rick Shenkman Rick Sterling Rita Rozhkova Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Debrus Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Fisk Robert Hampton Robert Henderson Robert Inlakesh Robert LaFlamme Robert Lindsay Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Stark Robert Stevens Robert Trivers Robert Wallace Robert Weissberg Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Rolo Slavskiy Romana Rubeo Romanized Visigoth Ron Paul Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning RT Staff Ruuben Kaalep Ryan Andrews Ryan Dawson Sabri Öncü Salim Mansur Sam Dickson Sam Francis Sam Husseini Sayed Hasan Scot Olmstead Scott Howard Scott Locklin Scott Ritter Servando Gonzalez Sharmine Narwani Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Sidney James Sietze Bosman Sigurd Kristensen Sinclair Jenkins Southfront Editor Spencer Davenport Spencer J. Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen F. Cohen Stephen J. Rossi Stephen J. Sniegoski Stephen Paul Foster Sterling Anderson Steve Fraser Steve Keen Steve Penfield Steven Farron Steven Yates Subhankar Banerjee Susan Southard Sydney Schanberg Talia Mullin Tanya Golash-Boza Taxi Taylor McClain Taylor Young Ted O'Keefe Ted Rall The Crew The Zman Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas A. Fudge Thomas Anderson Thomas Hales Thomas Dalton Thomas Ertl Thomas Frank Thomas Hales Thomas Jackson Thomas O. Meehan Thomas Steuben Thomas Zaja Thorsten J. Pattberg Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Timothy Vorgenss Timur Fomenko Tingba Muhammad Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Engelhardt Tom Mysiewicz Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Torin Murphy Tracy Rosenberg Travis LeBlanc Vernon Thorpe Virginia Dare Vito Klein Vladimir Brovkin Vladimir Putin Vladislav Krasnov Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walt King Walter E. Block Warren Balogh Washington Watcher Washington Watcher II Wayne Allensworth Wei Ling Chua Wesley Muhammad White Man Faculty Whitney Webb Wilhelm Kriessmann Wilhem Ivorsson Will Jones Will Offensicht William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Wyatt Peterson Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen Yaroslav Podvolotskiy Yvonne Lorenzo Zhores Medvedev
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2020 Election Academia American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Benjamin Netanyahu Black Crime Black Lives Matter Blacks Britain Censorship China China/America Conspiracy Theories Covid Culture/Society Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy Gaza Hamas History Holocaust Ideology Immigration IQ Iran Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Joe Biden NATO Nazi Germany Neocons Open Thread Political Correctness Race/Ethnicity Russia Science Syria Ukraine Vladimir Putin World War II 汪精衛 100% Jussie-free Content 1984 2008 Election 2012 Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2022 Election 2024 Election 23andMe 9/11 9/11 Commission Report Abortion Abraham Lincoln Abu Mehdi Muhandas Achievement Gap ACLU Acting White Adam Schiff Addiction ADL Admin Administration Admixture Adolf Hitler Advertising AfD Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Age Age Of Malthusian Industrialism Agriculture AI AIPAC Air Force Aircraft Carriers Airlines Airports Al Jazeera Al Qaeda Al-Shifa Alain Soral Alan Clemmons Alan Dershowitz Albania Albert Einstein Albion's Seed Alcoholism Alejandro Mayorkas Alex Jones Alexander Dugin Alexander Vindman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Alexei Navalny Algeria Ali Dawabsheh Alien And Sedition Acts Alison Nathan Alt Right Altruism Amazon Amazon.com America America First American Civil War American Dream American History American Indians American Israel Public Affairs Committee American Jews American Left American Nations American Presidents American Prisons American Renaissance Amerindians Amish Amnesty Amnesty International Amos Hochstein Amy Klobuchar Amygdala Anarchism Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Greece Ancient Rome Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Bacevich Andrew Sullivan Andrew Yang Anglo-America Anglo-imperialism Anglo-Saxons Anglos Anglosphere Angola Animal IQ Animal Rights Wackos Animals Ann Coulter Anne Frank Anthony Blinken Anthony Fauci Anthrax Anthropology Anti-Defamation League Anti-Gentilism Anti-Semites Anti-Vaccination Anti-Vaxx Anti-white Animus Antifa Antifeminism Antiracism Antisemitism Antisemitism Awareness Act Antisocial Behavior Antizionism Antony Blinken Apartheid Apartheid Israel Apollo's Ascent Appalachia Apple Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaeogenetics Archaeology Archaic DNA Architecture Arctic Arctic Sea Ice Melting Argentina Ariel Sharon Armageddon War Armenia Armenian Genocide Army Arnold Schwarzenegger Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Jensen Arthur Lichte Artificial Intelligence Arts/Letters Aryans Aryeh Lightstone Ash Carter Ashkenazi Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians Assassination Assassinations Assimilation Atheism Atlanta AUMF Auschwitz Australia Australian Aboriginals Autism Automation Avril Haines Ayn Rand Azerbaijan Azov Brigade Babes And Hunks Baby Gap Balfour Declaration Balkans Balochistan Baltics Baltimore Riots Banjamin Netanyahu Banking Industry Banking System Banks #BanTheADL Barack Obama Baseball Statistics Bashar Al-Assad Basketball #BasketOfDeplorables BBC BDS BDS Movement Beauty Beethoven Behavior Genetics Behavioral Genetics Bela Belarus Belgium Belgrade Embassy Bombing Ben Cardin Ben Hodges Ben Rhodes Ben Shapiro Ben Stiller Benny Gantz Bernard Henri-Levy Bernie Sanders Betsy DeVos Betty McCollum Bezalel Smotrich Bezalel Yoel Smotrich Biden BigPost Bilateral Relations Bilingual Education Bill Clinton Bill De Blasio Bill Gates Bill Kristol Bill Maher Bill Of Rights Billionaires Billy Graham Bioethics Biology Bioweapons Birmingham Birth Rate Bitcoin Black Community Black History Month Black Muslims Black Panthers Black People Black Slavery BlackLivesMatter BlackRock Blake Masters Blank Slatism BLM Blog Blogging Blogosphere Blond Hair Blood Libel Blue Eyes Boasian Anthropology Boeing Boers Bolshevik Revolution Bolshevik Russia Books Boomers Border Wall Boris Johnson Bosnia Boycott Divest And Sanction Brain Drain Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Bret Stephens Brett McGurk Bretton Woods Brexit Brezhnev Bri Brian Mast BRICs Brighter Brains British Empire British Labour Party British Politics Buddhism Build The Wall Bulldog Bush Business Byzantine Caitlin Johnstone California Californication Camp Of The Saints Canada Cancer Candace Owens Capitalism Carl Von Clausewitz Carlos Slim Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Cars Carthaginians Catalonia Catholic Church Catholicism Catholics Cats Caucasus CDC Ceasefire Cecil Rhodes Census Central Asia Central Intelligence Agency Chanda Chisala Chaos And Order Charles De Gaulle Charles Manson Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charlie Hebdo Charlottesville Checheniest Chechen Of Them All Chechens Chechnya Chernobyl Chetty Chicago Chicagoization Chicken Hut Child Abuse Children Chile China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese IQ Chinese Language Christian Zionists Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Christopher Wray Chuck Schumer CIA Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil Rights Movement Civil War Civilization Clannishness Clash Of Civilizations Class Classical Antiquity Classical History Classical Music Clayton County Climate Climate Change Clint Eastwood Clintons Coal Coalition Of The Fringes Cognitive Elitism Cognitive Science Cold Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Powell Colin Woodard College Admission College Football Colonialism Color Revolution Columbia University Columbus Comic Books Communism Computers Confederacy Confederate Flag Congress Conquistador-American Conservatism Conservative Movement Conservatives Conspiracy Theory Constantinople Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumerism Controversial Book Convergence Core Article Corona Corporatism Corruption COTW Counterpunch Country Music Cousin Marriage Cover Story COVID-19 Craig Murray Creationism Crime Crimea Crispr Critical Race Theory Cruise Missiles Crusades Crying Among The Farmland Cryptocurrency Ctrl-Left Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckery Cuckservatism Cuckservative CUFI Cuisine Cultural Marxism Cultural Revolution Culture Culture War Curfew Czars Czech Republic DACA Daily Data Dump Dallas Shooting Damnatio Memoriae Dan Bilzarian Danny Danon Daren Acemoglu Darwinism Darya Dugina Data Data Analysis Dave Chappelle David Bazelon David Brog David Friedman David Frum David Irving David Lynch David Petraeus Davide Piffer Davos Death Of The West Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Deborah Lipstadt Debt Debt Jubilee Decadence Deep State Deficits Degeneracy Democracy Democratic Party Demograhics Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denmark Dennis Ross Department Of Homeland Security Deplatforming Derek Chauvin Detroit Development Dick Cheney Diet Digital Yuan Dinesh D'Souza Discrimination Disease Disinformation Disney Disparate Impact Dissent Dissidence Diversity Diversity Before Diversity Diversity Pokemon Points Divorce DNA Dogs Dollar Domestic Surveillance Domestic Terrorism Doomsday Clock Dostoevsky Doug Emhoff Doug Feith Dresden Drone War Drones Drug Laws Drugs Duterte Dysgenic Dystopia E. Michael Jones E. O. Wilson East Asia East Asian Exception East Asians East Turkestan Eastern Europe Ebrahim Raisi Economic Development Economic History Economic Sanctions Economy Ecuador Edmund Burke Edmund Burke Foundation Education Edward Snowden Effective Altruism Effortpost Efraim Zurofff Egor Kholmogorov Egypt Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2020 Election Fraud Elections Electric Cars Eli Rosenbaum Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elise Stefanik Elites Elizabeth Holmes Elizabeth Warren Elliot Abrams Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emmanuel Macron Emmett Till Employment Energy England Entertainment Environment Environmentalism Epidemiology Equality Erdogan Eretz Israel Eric Zemmour Ernest Hemingway Espionage Espionage Act Estonia Ethics Ethics And Morals Ethiopia Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity Ethnocentricty EU Eugene Debs Eugenics Eurabia Eurasia Euro Europe European Genetics European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Genetics Evolutionary Psychology Existential Risks Eye Color Face Shape Facebook Faces Fake News False Flag Attack Family Family Systems Fantasy FARA Farmers Fascism Fast Food FBI FDA FDD Federal Reserve Feminism Ferguson Ferguson Shooting Fermi Paradox Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates FIFA Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Finland Finn Baiting Finns First Amendment FISA Fitness Flash Mobs Flight From White Floyd Riots 2020 Fluctuarius Argenteus Flynn Effect Food Football For Fun Forecasts Foreign Agents Registration Act Foreign Policy Fourth Amendment Fox News France Francesca Albanese Frank Salter Frankfurt School Franklin D. Roosevelt Franz Boas Fraud Freakonomics Fred Kagan Free Market Free Speech Free Trade Freedom Of Speech Freedom French Revolution Friedrich Karl Berger Friends Of The Israel Defense Forces Frivolty Frontlash Furkan Dogan Future Futurism G20 Gambling Game Game Of Thrones Gavin McInnes Gavin Newsom Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians GDP Gen Z Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Equality Gender Reassignment Gene-Culture Coevolution Genealogy General Intelligence General Motors Generation Z Generational Gap Genes Genetic Diversity Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Genghis Khan Genocide Genocide Convention Genomics Gentrification Geography Geopolitics George Floyd George Galloway George Patton George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush Georgia Germans Germany Ghislaine Maxwell Gilad Atzmon Gina Peddy Giorgia Meloni Gladwell Glenn Greenwald Global Warming Globalism Globalization Globo-Homo God Gold Golf Gonzalo Lira Google Government Government Debt Government Overreach Government Spending Government Surveillance Government Waste Goyim Grant Smith Graphs Great Bifurcation Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Powers Great Replacement #GreatWhiteDefendantPrivilege Greece Greeks Greenland Greg Cochran Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Greta Thunberg Grooming Group Intelligence Group Selection GSS Guardian Guest Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns Guy Swan GWAS Gypsies H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Haiti Hajnal Line Halloween HammerHate Hannibal Procedure Happening Happiness Harvard Harvard University Harvey Weinstein Hassan Nasrallah Hate Crimes Fraud Hoax Hate Hoaxes Hate Speech Hbd Hbd Chick Health Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Hegira Height Henry Harpending Henry Kissinger Hereditary Heredity Heritability Hezbollah High Speed Rail Hillary Clinton Hindu Caste System Hindus Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanics Historical Genetics History Of Science Hitler HIV/AIDS Hoax Holland Hollywood Holocaust Denial Holocaust Deniers Holy Roman Empire Homelessness Homicide Homicide Rate Homomania Homosexuality Hong Kong Houellebecq Housing Houthis Howard Kohr Huawei Hubbert's Peak Huddled Masses Huey Newton Hug Thug Human Achievement Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Evolutionary Genetics Human Evolutionary Genomics Human Genetics Human Genomics Human Rights Human Rights Watch Humor Hungary Hunt For The Great White Defendant Hunter Biden Hunter-Gatherers I.F. Stone I.Q. I.Q. Genomics #IBelieveInHavenMonahan ICC Icj Ideas Identity Ideology And Worldview IDF Idiocracy Igbo Igor Shafarevich Ilan Pappe Ilhan Omar Illegal Immigration Ilyushin IMF Impeachment Imperialism Imran Awan Inbreeding Income India Indian Indian IQ Indians Individualism Indo-Europeans Indonesia Inequality Inflation Intelligence Intelligence Agencies Intelligent Design International International Affairs International Comparisons International Court Of Justice International Criminal Court International Relations Internet Interracial Marriage Interracism Intersectionality Intifada Intra-Racism Intraracism Invade Invite In Hock Invade The World Invite The World Iosef Stalin Iosif Stalin Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iranian Nuclear Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Irish Is Love Colorblind Isaac Herzog ISIS Islam Islamic Jihad Islamic State Islamism Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Bonds Israel Defense Force Israel Defense Forces Israel Separation Wall Israeli Occupation IT Italy Itamar Ben-Gvir It's Okay To Be White Ivanka Ivy League J Street Jacky Rosen Jair Bolsonaro Jake Sullivan Jake Tapper Jamal Khashoggi James Angleton James B. Watson James Clapper James Comey James Forrestal James Jeffrey James Mattis James Watson Janet Yellen Janice Yellen Japan Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Greenblatt JASTA JCPOA JD Vance Jeb Bush Jeffrey Epstein Jeffrey Goldberg Jeffrey Sachs Jen Psaki Jennifer Rubin Jens Stoltenberg Jeremy Corbyn Jerry Seinfeld Jerusalem Jerusalem Post Jesuits Jesus Jesus Christ Jewish Genetics Jewish History Jewish Intellectuals Jewish Power Jewish Power Party Jewish Supremacism JFK Assassination JFK Jr. Jihadis Jill Stein Jimmy Carter Jingoism JINSA Joe Lieberman Joe Rogan John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John F. Kennedy John Hagee John Hawks John Kirby John Kiriakou John McCain John McLaughlin John Mearsheimer Joker Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Greenblatt Jonathan Pollard Jordan Peterson Joseph Kennedy Joseph McCarthy Josh Gottheimer Josh Paul Journalism Judaism Judea Judge George Daniels Judicial System Julian Assange Jussie Smollett Justice Justin Trudeau Kaboom Kahanists Kaiser Wilhelm Kamala Harris Kamala On Her Knees Kanye West Karabakh War 2020 Karen Kwiatkowski Karine Jean-Pierre Kashmir Kata'ib Hezbollah Kay Bailey Hutchison Kazakhstan Keir Starmer Kenneth Marcus Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Williamson Khazars Khrushchev Kids Kim Jong Un Kinship Kkk KKKrazy Glue Of The Coalition Of The Fringes Knesset Kompromat Korea Korean War Kosovo Kris Kobach Kristi Noem Ku Klux Klan Kubrick Kurds Kushner Foundation Kyle Rittenhouse Kyrie Irving Language Laos Larry C. Johnson Late Obama Age Collapse Latin America Latinos Laura Loomer Law Lawfare LDNR Lead Poisoning Leahy Amendments Leahy Law Lebanon Lee Kuan Yew Leftism Lenin Leo Frank Leo Strauss Let's Talk About My Hair LGBT LGBTI Liberal Opposition Liberal Whites Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libya Light Skin Preference Lindsey Graham Linguistics Literacy Literature Lithuania Litvinenko Living Standards Liz Cheney Liz Truss Lloyd Austin Localism long-range-missile-defense Longevity Looting Lord Of The Rings Lorde Los Angeles Loudoun County Louis Farrakhan Love And Marriage Low-fat Lukashenko Lula Lyndon B Johnson Lyndon Johnson Madeleine Albright Mafia MAGA Magnitsky Act Malaysia Malaysian Airlines MH17 Manosphere Manufacturing Mao Zedong Map Marco Rubio Maria Butina Marijuana Marine Le Pen Marjorie Taylor Greene Mark Milley Mark Steyn Mark Warner Marriage Martin Luther King Martin Scorsese Marvel Marx Marxism Masculinity Mass Shootings Mate Choice Mathematics Mathilde Krim Matt Gaetz Max Boot Max Weber Maxine Waters Mayans McCain McCain/POW McDonald's Meat Media Media Bias Medicine Medieval Christianity Medieval Russia Mediterranean Diet Medvedev Megan McCain Meghan Markle Mein Obama MEK Mel Gibson Men With Gold Chains Meng Wanzhou Mental Health Mental Illness Mental Traits Meritocracy Merkel Merkel Youth Merkel's Boner Merrick Garland Mexico MH 17 MI-6 Michael Bloomberg Michael Collins PIper Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Michael Jackson Michael Lind Michael McFaul Michael Moore Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michelle Goldberg Michelle Ma Belle Michelle Obama Microaggressions Middle Ages Middle East Migration Mike Huckabee Mike Johnson Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mike Waltz Mikhael Gorbachev Miles Mathis Militarized Police Military Military Analysis Military Budget Military History Military Spending Military Technology Millennials Milner Group Minimum Wage Minneapolis Minorities Miriam Adelson Miscellaneous Misdreavus Mishima Missile Defense Mitch McConnell Mitt Romney Mixed-Race MK-Ultra Mohammed Bin Salman Monarchy Mondoweiss Money Mongolia Mongols Monkeypox Monogamy Moon Landing Hoax Moon Landings Moore's Law Morality Mormonism Mormons Mortality Mortgage Moscow Mossad Movies Muhammad Multiculturalism Music Muslim Ban Muslims Mussolini NAEP Naftali Bennett Nakba NAMs Nancy Pelos Nancy Pelosi Narendra Modi NASA Nation Of Hate Nation Of Islam National Assessment Of Educational Progress National Debt National Endowment For Democracy National Review National Security Strategy National Socialism National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans Natural Gas Nature Vs. Nurture Navalny Affair Navy Standards Nazis Nazism Neandertals Neanderthals Near Abroad Negrolatry Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolibs Neolithic Neoreaction Netherlands Never Again Education Act New Cold War New Dark Age New Horizon Foundation New Orleans New Silk Road New Tes New World Order New York New York City New York Times New Zealand New Zealand Shooting NFL Nicholas II Nicholas Wade Nick Eberstadt Nick Fuentes Nicolas Maduro Niger Nigeria Nike Nikki Haley NIMBY Nina Jankowicz No Fly Zone Noam Chomsky Nobel Prize Nord Stream Nord Stream Pipelines Nordics Norman Braman Norman Finkelstein Norman Lear North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway Novorossiya NSA Nuclear Power Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Nuremberg Nutrition NYPD Obama Obama Presidency Obamacare Obesity Obituary Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Wall Street October Surprise Oedipus Complex OFAC Oil Oil Industry Oklahoma City Bombing Olav Scholz Old Testament Oliver Stone Olympics Open Borders OpenThread Opinion Poll Opioids Orban Organized Crime Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Orwell Osama Bin Laden OTFI Our Soldiers Speak Out Of Africa Model Paganism Pakistan Pakistani Paleoanthropology Paleocons Palestine Palestinians Palin Panhandling Papacy Paper Review Parasite Burden Parenting Parenting Paris Attacks Partly Inbred Extended Family Pat Buchanan Pathogens Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Findley Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Durov Pavel Grudinin Paypal Peace Peak Oil Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Pentagon Personal Genomics Personality Pete Buttgieg Pete Buttigieg Pete Hegseth Peter Frost Peter Thiel Peter Turchin Petro Poroshenko Pew Phil Rushton Philadelphia Philippines Philosophy Phoenicians Phyllis Randall Physiognomy Piers Morgan Pigmentation Pigs Pioneers Piracy PISA Pizzagate POC Ascendancy Podcast Poland Police Police State Polio Political Correctness Makes You Stupid Political Dissolution Political Economy Politicians Politics Polling Pollution Polygamy Polygyny Pope Francis Population Population Genetics Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Porn Pornography Portland Portugal Portuguese Post-Apocalypse Poverty Power Pramila Jayapal PRC Prediction Prescription Drugs President Joe Biden Presidential Race '08 Presidential Race '12 Presidential Race '16 Presidential Race '20 Prince Andrew Prince Harry Priti Patel Privacy Privatization Progressives Propaganda Prostitution protest Protestantism Proud Boys Psychology Psychometrics Psychopathy Public Health Public Schools Puerto Rico Puritans Putin Putin Derangement Syndrome QAnon Qassem Soleimani Qatar Quantitative Genetics Quebec Quiet Skies Quincy Institute R2P Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race/IQ Race Riots Rachel Corrie Racial Purism Racial Reality Racialism Racism Rafah Raj Shah Rand Paul Randy Fine Rap Music Rape Rashida Tlaib Rationality Ray McGovern Raymond Chandler Razib Khan Real Estate RealWorld Recep Tayyip Erdogan Red Sea Refugee Crisis #refugeeswelcome Religion Religion And Philosophy Rentier Reparations Reprint Republican Party Republicans Review Revisionism Rex Tillerson RFK Assassination Ricci Richard Dawkins Richard Goldberg Richard Grenell Richard Haas Richard Haass Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Rightwing Cinema Riots R/k Theory RMAX Robert A. Heinlein Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Ford Robert Kagan Robert Kraft Robert Maxwell Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert O'Brien Robert Reich Robots Rock Music Roe Vs. Wade Roger Waters Rolling Stone Roman Empire Romania Romanticism Rome Ron DeSantis Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rotherham Rothschilds RT International Rudy Giuliani Rush Limbaugh Russiagate Russian Demography Russian Elections 2018 Russian History Russian Media Russian Military Russian Nationalism Russian Occupation Government Russian Orthodox Church Russian Reaction Russians Russophobes Russophobia Russotriumph Ruth Bader Ginsburg Rwanda Sabrina Rubin Erdely Sacha Baron Cohen Sacklers Sailer Strategy Sailer's First Law Of Female Journalism Saint Peter Tear Down This Gate! Saint-Petersburg Salman Rushie Salt Sam Bankman-Fried Sam Francis Samantha Power Samson Option San Bernadino Massacre Sandra Beleza Sandy Hook Sapir-Whorf SAT Satanic Age Satanism Saudi Arabia Scandal Science Denialism Science Fiction Scooter Libby Scotland Scott Ritter Scrabble Sean Hannity Seattle Secession Self Determination Self Indulgence Semites Serbia Sergei Lavrov Sergei Skripal Sergey Glazyev Seth Rich Sex Sex Differences Sex Ratio At Birth Sexual Harassment Sexual Selection Sexuality Seymour Hersh Shai Masot Shakespeare Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Shared Environment Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shireen Abu Akleh Shmuley Boteach Shoah Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shulamit Aloni Shurat HaDin Sigal Mandelker Sigar Pearl Mandelker Sigmund Freud Silicon Valley Singapore Single Men Single Women Sinotriumph Six Day War Sixties SJWs Skin Color Slavery Slavery Reparations Slavoj Zizek Slavs Smart Fraction Social Justice Warriors Social Media Social Science Socialism Society Sociobiology Sociology Sodium Solzhenitsyn Somalia Sotomayor South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea Southeast Asia Soviet History Soviet Union Sovok Space Space Exploration Space Program Spain Spanish Spanish River High School SPLC Sport Sports Srebrenica St Petersburg International Economic Forum Stabby Somali Staffan Stage Stalinism Standardized Tests Star Trek Star Wars Starbucks Starvation Comparisons State Department Statistics Statue Of Liberty Steny Hoyer Stephen Cohen Stephen Colbert Stephen Harper Stephen Jay Gould Stephen Townsend Stereotypes Steroids Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steven Pinker Strait Of Hormuz Strategic Ambiguity Stuart Levey Stuart Seldowitz Student Debt Stuff White People Like Sub-replacement Fertility Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subhas Chandra Bose Subprime Mortgage Crisis Suburb Suella Braverman Sugar Suicide Superintelligence Supreme Court Susan Glasser Svidomy Sweden Switzerland Symington Amendment Syrian Civil War Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Take Action Taliban Talmud Tatars Taxation Taxes Tea Party Technical Considerations Technology Ted Cruz Telegram Television Terrorism Terrorists Terry McAuliffe Tesla Testing Testosterone Tests Texas THAAD Thailand The 10/7 Project The AK The American Conservative The Bell Curve The Bible The Black Autumn The Cathedral The Confederacy The Constitution The Eight Banditos The Family The Free World The Great Awokening The Left The Middle East The New York Times The South The States The Zeroth Amendment To The Constitution Theranos Theresa May Third World Thomas Jefferson Thomas Moorer Thought Crimes Tiananmen Massacre Tibet Tiger Mom TikTok TIMSS Tom Cotton Tom Massie Tom Wolfe Tony Blair Tony Blinken Tony Kleinfeld Too Many White People Torture Trade Trans Fat Trans Fats Transgender Transgenderism Transhumanism Translation Translations Transportation Travel Trayvon Martin Trolling True Redneck Stereotypes Trump Trump Derangement Syndrome Trust Tsarist Russia Tucker Carlson Tulsa Tulsi Gabbard Turkey Turks TWA 800 Twins Twitter Ucla UFOs UK Ukrainian Crisis UN Security Council Unbearable Whiteness Unemployment Unions United Kingdom United Nations United Nations General Assembly United Nations Security Council United States Universal Basic Income UNRWA Urbanization Ursula Von Der Leyen Uruguay US Blacks US Capitol Storming 2021 US Civil War II US Constitution US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 US Regionalism USA USAID USS Liberty USSR Uyghurs Uzbekistan Vaccination Vaccines Valdimir Putin Valerie Plame Vdare Venezuela Vibrancy Victoria Nuland Victorian England Video Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Vikings Viktor Orban Viktor Yanukovych Violence Vioxx Virginia Virginia Israel Advisory Board Vitamin D Vivek Ramaswamy Vladimir Zelensky Volodymur Zelenskyy Volodymyr Zelensky Vote Fraud Voter Fraud Voting Rights Voting Rights Act Vulcan Society Wall Street Walmart Wang Ching Wei Wang Jingwei War War Crimes War Guilt War In Donbass War On Christmas War On Terror War Powers War Powers Act Warhammer Washington DC WASPs Watergate Wealth Wealth Inequality Wealthy Web Traffic Weight WEIRDO Welfare Wendy Sherman West Bank Western Decline Western European Marriage Pattern Western Hypocrisy Western Media Western Religion Western Revival Westerns White America White Americans White Death White Flight White Guilt White Helmets White Liberals White Man's Burden White Nakba White Nationalism White Nationalists White People White Privilege White Slavery White Supremacy White Teachers Whiterpeople Whites Who Whom Whoopi Goldberg Wikileaks Wikipedia William Browder William F. Buckley William Kristol William Latson William McGonagle William McRaven WINEP Winston Churchill WMD Woke Capital Women Woodrow Wilson Workers Working Class World Bank World Economic Forum World Health Organization World Population World Values Survey World War G World War H World War Hair World War I World War III World War R World War T World War Weed WTF WVS WWII Xi Jinping Xinjiang Yahya Sinwar Yair Lapid Yemen Yevgeny Prigozhin Yoav Gallant Yogi Berra's Restaurant Yoram Hazony YouTube Yugoslavia Yuval Noah Harari Zbigniew Brzezinski Zimbabwe Zionism Zionists Zvika Fogel
Nothing found
All Commenters •ï¿½My
Comments
•ï¿½Followed
Commenters
�⇅All / On "Sinotriumph"
    Where will Chinese GDP end up: At ~US level, or 2-3x the US level? Very important question - after all, it will determine whether the world will remain unipolar (if China ~= US, the latter will remain dominant thanks to its alliance system and soft power) or "bifurcated" between a US-Western sphere and a Sino-centric...
  • Smith says:
    @Showmethereal
    @Smith

    Yeah I have to type fast because I dont have so much spare time to reply back to you.

    1 - Actually the art of the ninja - like Zen buddhism are what Japan adapted from China. But in any event children watching it dont associate either of them with Japan nor China. You do realize that TMNT was not created by Japanese right? That is like saying Big Trouble in Little China or even Airbender counts as Chinese soft power. Maybe indirectly - but not directly.

    2 - already addressed... Bruce was clear on who he was and what he did. Some of my kindred were involved in that i dustry back then. Everyone in Hong Kong considered themselves Chinese then amd were taking up the mantle for the Chinese people. None of Bruce stuff he did in Hong Kong was meant to appease the west - even though he invited westerners. The whole point of his films was he was saving Chinese people from disgrace by westerners and Japanese. In fact much Hong Kong film in those days was about that. Many even were against Manchu rule during the Qing. You dont understand context.

    The rest of your comment is just unhinged

    Replies: @Smith

    You are still spouting wrong shit while typing frantically.

    1) TMNT is associated with japanese culture, the fact japanese culture is inspired by China doesn’t matter, because ninja is a japanese thing. You are demonstrately wrong but you still say this bullshit, even when your analyst you quote says different. And yes, the fact foreigners make media influenced by jap culture shows the strength of jap soft power, WORLDWIDE because people want to be associated with japanese culture.

    2). Bruce’s most successful film in HK was Fist of Fury, which is Bruce dressed in western white cloth fighting against japs, while Bruce’s most successful film ever was Enter the Dragon where he fights against the westerners, and not about China pride or whatever but as a special agent HIRED by the brits, that is literally joining the international pool.

    You are wrong and continue to be wrong, my only question: why?

    And how am I unhinged?

  • @Max Payne
    @Zhang Shoucheng

    What you say are just observations of (universal) bad consumer habits…. Not faults of the country itself.

    My point is that the vast majority of Canadians do not live well at all and what counts in life is what you got – not what you paid.
    �
    Bro…the vast majority of Canadians were just handed $12,000 for nothing and those still jobless got (or are getting) another $16,000 (on top of whatever EI they clocked in) even though employers are sucking dick to hire people. In what country can an individual get $28,000 for a bitch nothing flu? That's Canadian dollars btw, not rupees or rubels or whatever fake currency people are using.

    I know enough families that appreciated the extra income boost (for example stay-at-home moms get that $12k-$28k, which is a nice cushion on top of her husbands income).

    A drug addict in Vancouver right now is probably shooting up $28k worth of heroin in his veins like a boss.

    The Canadian government will never go bankrupt. It’s just gets cheap sometimes and needs to be reminded it only has 32 odd million people, lots of land and resources, clean water, and the United States as its big-boy pants. I like to stick my hand in my pants sometimes. That's how I feel when I buy things from the great US market. (it feels awesome in case you were wondering)

    Canadians are really comfortable. Canada is literally the land of milk and honey. If you think otherwise you’re doing Canada wrong. I can't put it any plainer. Below in the More section is an explanation to how your observations are merely bad consumer habits. Does not mean Canadians aren't balling it up like its 1999.

    I have driven on the road between Kyiv and Kharkov. It is being improved and eventually will be just as good as any road in BC.
    �
    Building a road is a non-issue. Maintaining a road is. Plowing it, salting it (with salt that is effective and doesn’t cause Chernobyl-level runoff), repaving (thanks plow rape), and doing that while ensuring the road remains open for organized traffic for great distances. You’re talking about year-round seasonal construction on certain stretches of roads. Highway 401 is considered the busiest in North America and has always been in some form of expansion, construction, improvement, or maintenance. The construction equipment are part of the highway.

    Even vaunted Shanghai had some disgusting roads. Sure, Pudong maintains a facade of being uber maintained but move out to Fudan university and you’ll start to wonder how hard is it really to keep all the roads decently maintained…. Especially in such a small area in an international city that can muster cheap labour/materials unhindered by snow or Environment Canada….

    So clearly it’s not as easy as everyone thinks it is (even though it is really easy).



    Tell that to my rear suspension that was nearly torn apart in a rut in Maple Ridge.
    �
    Nearly torn apart, but not quite. You probably need new rear-shocks or you're driving on bald tires.

    A bad consumer habit is the lack of proactive maintenance in regards to their automobile. Take care of your car and it will last longer than you. It's made of metal. It can most assuredly live longer than humans.

    If the damage is significant enough and your insurance covers it file a claim. If the city is at fault everyone is a winner.

    By the way an automobile is a cash flow negative depreciating asset. Unless it is a very specific classic car, such as a Mercedes-Benz 300 SL “Gullwingâ€, it will end up worth absolutely zero.
    �
    Obviously. You don't need to buy a brand new car to enjoy it. Everyone knows the value drops by 15% the second you sign the paper. So don't buy a new car. Got it. 2015 Porsche Cayenne from the US for 14.5k second hand, great condition. Hands in my pants. A 2012 bmw 3 series locally for 7k that needed new coils ($150 cheap aftermarkets and works beautifully). Two half-decent cars that I can enjoy for summer and winter. Pop on Youtube and do your own service. What’s the problem? The alternative is to WASTE MY TIME sitting in public transportation? Then the argument is how much is your time worth?

    Anyway no need to bankrupt yourself to enjoy the fun things in life. Lack of research into alternatives is considered bad consumer habits. Unless you enjoy driving cars with worn out shocks.

    they sure must love paying all their net cash flow to ICBC in vehicle insurance!
    �
    How many accidents have you been in to have high insurance? In my reckless 20s with a “a new driver MALE with a high risk sports car†and enough speeding tickets to be on first name basis with the local Provincial Offences office I wasn’t paying more than $1,200 annually for insurance. Did you run over a Korean family or something?

    I had a girlfriend the same time that drove a gay Yaris, she had no tickets and was paying $1,100 insurance because the car was a death trap. If your car is really old it does pay to get something newer for the insurance.

    Lack of consumer diligence is part of bad consumer habits.

    Have you tried BCAA? Probably give you a better deal if you group your house insurance with them too. Could be outdated info, but they were good to me.

    then very big allowances made for fraudulent accounting such as the Canadian real estate scam.
    �
    Canadian 'funny money' is not a bug, it’s a feature. You are witnessing the mechanisms that protect us from being turned into a Mexico by the US.

    Do not confuse the serfs and plebs of Canada, imported or domestic, with those that actually RUN Canada, operate its businesses and produce its few decent products/fields.

    It's not lost on Canadians that wealthy foreigners are willing to pay these ridiculous prices. It must mean it’s worth it because they love coming here. It’s why a shitty 300k home 15 years ago has surpassed the 1-million-dollar mark. Someone is paying for it which makes Canada happy, the banks happy, and the seller happy. I thought covid-19 was gonna crash the market. I literally pissed myself for no reason because the market didn't even budge.

    If you made it this far and being a thread about China I'll add my anecdotal experience in 2007, 2015 which gives me pause on this China-cock-suck-fest everyone has, I guess it pays to see things first hand:

    So to sum it up my primary experience is in Shanghai as I've been there multiple times over the course of a decade. Beijing only once. Shenzhen, Guangzhou, and Hangzhou a handful of times for business, usually landing in Shanghai first anyway. A short stint through Shandong province. From the days of backpacking after high school (2006-7) to the regular business trips that have extended from 2011+. I can say Shanghai people are different from other Hans. Same with those that hail from Shandong province, who seem to be the REAL Chinese (legit niggas that project competence and confidence I rarely see in Asians).

    If you want to know how China operates just apply for a tourist visa and watch the shit they make you do and their impressive fetish with tiny little red ink stamps. A sampler of the nightmare complexity they like to add to the smallest irrelevant detail (yet missing entire points).

    In the summer of 2015 I was in Pudong and in need of a wicked piss. Being civilized I opted to look for a bathroom so I walked into one of those fancy buildings near the river within viewing distance of Pudong tower (aptly called “Office building†on Google Maps: https://goo.gl/maps/GiMupzEiNmjz89ns6 ). I was expecting it to be like any normal downtown financial building. Go in, use the public bathroom, walk out....

    It was surreal, it was in the afternoon during working hours. I walk in and the lobby was dead empty. A layer of dust huddled in corners in the main lobby with the lights off. These weren't cheap buildings, they had nice marble interiors, glass table for the non-existent security, in the heart of expensive real estate Pudong. No furniture though. Clearly money and effort went into erecting these buildings. The building wasn't vacant. There were three suited gentlemen who individually at different times walked into or out of the elevators unphased by a round-eye holding his crotch standing like a retard in the middle of an empty lobby.

    I hesitantly continue forward until I find the bathroom only to discover the lights were off there as well. The water was shut off and it had a smell that didn't befit the value of the marble and decor invested in the place. As if there was no building management to hire someone to maintain any of this shit. Typical. Build great things and forget the minor details to basically fall flat on your impact.

    Went to the adjacent building and it had similar conditions. After the third building I realized I would have to risk my anal virginity and pee in the darkness. I thought it was measures used to dissuade hobos sleeping in the bathroom but it's China, uniformed soldiers regularly patrol and are diligent. I know this because I sat on the stairs of a Lawsons in Pudong trying to read a map and 2 minutes later was nudged by a uniformed soldier to move along (with a smile, no violence, no English either). No loitering I guess.

    I visited some spots in Shanghai in 2007 that were just finishing construction on rows of residential apartments. In 2015 visiting that same spot the vast majority of the buildings were still empty. Expats tell me that 5-6 people will roommate up and rent a single apartment. I don't know if the Chinese government is unable to control rent rates or if people are really cheap or if its just better for a building to be vacant or if its a facade or this "construction industrial complex" or what.

    If I can find the 4x6 photo (yea I was taking pictures with a disposable Kodak camera at the time because it was 2007) I can upload it and the new one I took in 2015 with my phone to show how the buildings remain empty 8 years after construction. This isn't some nothing empty neighbourhood either as a Carrefour at the intersection was always busy with shoppers.

    Just like Canadian funny money, Chinese have their own methods of maintaining facades.

    Replies: @Wyatt

    That’s Canadian dollars btw, not rupees or rubels or whatever fake currency people are using.

    That’s funny. I usually chuck leaf-bucks into the Monopoly money pile. If your money isn’t backed by oil and arab blood, it ain’t worth shit.

  • Munga Bulga [AKA "HeebHunter"] says:
    @Chinaman
    @Tyler Durden


    The Chinese drive forward where the roads have already been paved. They are not trailblazers and never have been.

    If China is doing something, you can bet your house it was done before.

    Just last week, the China claimed it achieved quantum supremacy


    �
    10 billion times faster than the google’s 53 qbit prototype? That cannot be true. Chinese cannot innovate and you can bet some white dude have done it two hundred year ago.

    Do you suffer any physical symptoms from the cognitive dissonance that this news must have induced? Must be quite embarrassing to have oneself proven wrong on an outrageous claim one made just a week ago.

    Anyway, it is quite disconcerting to see someone contradict himself so readily just so to pander to his host.

    The findings in your article on COVID as biowarfare blowback are indeed surprising.
    �
    Look, we don’t care about evidence on this site. Who needs empirical evidence when you can have conspiracy theories? Anything that contradicts any wild theory published on this site must be wrong. The paper below is definitely wrong.

    https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciaa1785/6012472

    Replies: @Tyler Durden, @Munga Bulga

    They have no argument left. It is futile for you to attenmpt honest engagement with these sterile zombies.
    They, these so called “centrists” or “right-wing”, with their negro level reasoning and halfwit sophistry, are the reason why the west is now the (((west))).
    Boohoo, asians are copying us. All the while forgetting the rule of nature and what we did to build our legacies. And the fact that nobody stopped the voluntary exchange of tech to Asia.
    Not to mention the fact that all of science and engineering are built on top of eachother.
    It is not even self pitying, it is drivel of impotency.

    The more time I spend observing these so called “right wingers”, the more fatalistic I become.

  • Munga Bulga [AKA "HeebHunter"] says:
    @Tyler Durden
    @Chinaman

    Neither Asia nor China are monolithic entities. The same can be said of the Caucasian world.

    Though the Chinese are highly intelligent on average, I would estimate per-capita genius in China to be on par with Pakistan, given the paucity of Nobel-worthy discoveries. There are Chinese outliers, of course, but the IQ distribution is narrower with a shorter "right-tail." To put this in context, a few million Swedes have contributed more to the advancement of civilization than billions of Chinese. As a thought experiment, try to imagine how the world would look if there were 1.4 billion Swedes or Jews.

    The entire world is still confined in its actions and aspirations by the imagination of an infinitesimal number of geniuses (both living and dead) overwhelming of Jewish or Protestant ancestry. Everyone else is a slave of their imagination; their lives will be spent materializing what the geniuses imagined.

    Just as the Chinese migrant laborers spent their energy to materialize the Protestant vision of California, the Chinese today spend their enormous energy materializing the Protestant-Jewish vision of the world. Whether the Chinese lead the development of fusion or quantum computing, they are still advancing a foreign vision and serving the foreign cult of genius. The Protestant-Jewish elite have always viewed the Chinese as docile and industrious--the ideal slave class. They have long wished that the whole world would be more like China.

    "Africa for the Chinese" (Galton, 1873):
    https://galton.org/letters/africa-for-chinese/AfricaForTheChinese.htm

    Replies: @Deep Thought, @Munga Bulga

    try to imagine how the world would look if there were 1.4 billion Swedes or Jews

    Lol, is this retard for real?
    Either brutal extermination by the hands of thankfully long dead warlike Swedes or an even more insane liberal faggot dystopia than the (((west))) currently is.
    I havent seen any breakthrough from Sweden lately except in the export of poisonous liberalism.
    And you are furthering the myth of kike “geniuses” too. You are a stooge. All the talk about muh west and you are lumping in the plagiarizing kikes who forever taint European science.
    Fuck off.

  • @Smith
    @showmethereal

    You are typing frantically.

    1) Turtles that are trained in ninjutsu and fight with japanese weapons, learned from japanese virtues (fidelity to master, brotherly love between students), use zen meditation techniques to train and clear the mind, ARE not based on japanese culture? Really now, can you be THAT dishonest? Everyone loves TMNT because it's not only turtles, it's NINJA turtles.

    2) Mainland China had not, and that's a FLAW, now they celebrate Bruce Lee and they make martial art films, so they in fact learn soft power from Bruce Lee. And yes, Bruce Lee style is a hybrid, he mixes in boxing and even ballet dancing in his style, because even he knows the traditional wing chun taught is fake as shit. And yes I watch Bruce Lee films you boomer, his famous ones like Fist of Fury is a Hong Kong jap revenge flick based on the legend of Shen Zhen (I do like the Jet Li version better), and Way of the Dragon, which is like the precursor of Street Fighter where he infiltrates a martial tournament and fight against other styles. And the point is while CTHD is filmed in China, is about China, but it doesn't do much in Asia, I don't know why, maybe they omit the screening.

    3) Now I know you aren't an asian or at least some kind asian amelican mutt, asians huddle together in this white-controlled world, that's why asian media is consumed by asian and why chinks like stuff like anime and jap samurai, and japs love chink martial artists and films. And viets love both.

    4) And yes, the westerners do get empathy, politeness and hard-working as part of japanese virtues, which is a bigger part in asian virtues. Again, YOUR analyst even says that! These are unmistakenly japanese and larger asian virtues, the westerners are about muh frankness, muh freedom, muh individuality.

    5) I don't even know where you arrive at the part I'm japanese, but maybe because I'm actual asian, so my thinking is different than your and d dan who seem very westernized, but indeed, race and culture are intertwined, BUT both are equally important. There's no point to all the race shit if you are some kind of "Asian amelican" mutt who grows up watching gangster movies and becomes some azn gangbangers. BUT there's some good if asians grow up watching stuff like Bruce Lee movies, Akira Kurosawa movies or Dragonball, Mazinger Z or Doraemon, that shit BUILDScharacter and confidence for asian going forward and teaches what asian culture is.

    Again, putting race in a pedestal, that itself is a flaw of white nationalism, and why the white niggers in America degrade so much, they ONLY have vulgar racism. Asian nationalism must go deeper, which is the preservation of asian race AND culture, because nature and nurture are both important. I have a feeling asian americans are so fucked because aside from the fact they face outright racism, their community/culture link was cut from the homeland.

    Replies: @Showmethereal

    Yeah I have to type fast because I dont have so much spare time to reply back to you.

    1 – Actually the art of the ninja – like Zen buddhism are what Japan adapted from China. But in any event children watching it dont associate either of them with Japan nor China. You do realize that TMNT was not created by Japanese right? That is like saying Big Trouble in Little China or even Airbender counts as Chinese soft power. Maybe indirectly – but not directly.

    2 – already addressed… Bruce was clear on who he was and what he did. Some of my kindred were involved in that i dustry back then. Everyone in Hong Kong considered themselves Chinese then amd were taking up the mantle for the Chinese people. None of Bruce stuff he did in Hong Kong was meant to appease the west – even though he invited westerners. The whole point of his films was he was saving Chinese people from disgrace by westerners and Japanese. In fact much Hong Kong film in those days was about that. Many even were against Manchu rule during the Qing. You dont understand context.

    The rest of your comment is just unhinged

    •ï¿½Replies: @Smith
    @Showmethereal

    You are still spouting wrong shit while typing frantically.

    1) TMNT is associated with japanese culture, the fact japanese culture is inspired by China doesn't matter, because ninja is a japanese thing. You are demonstrately wrong but you still say this bullshit, even when your analyst you quote says different. And yes, the fact foreigners make media influenced by jap culture shows the strength of jap soft power, WORLDWIDE because people want to be associated with japanese culture.

    2). Bruce's most successful film in HK was Fist of Fury, which is Bruce dressed in western white cloth fighting against japs, while Bruce's most successful film ever was Enter the Dragon where he fights against the westerners, and not about China pride or whatever but as a special agent HIRED by the brits, that is literally joining the international pool.

    You are wrong and continue to be wrong, my only question: why?

    And how am I unhinged?
  • @Tyler Durden
    @Chinaman

    Neither Asia nor China are monolithic entities. The same can be said of the Caucasian world.

    Though the Chinese are highly intelligent on average, I would estimate per-capita genius in China to be on par with Pakistan, given the paucity of Nobel-worthy discoveries. There are Chinese outliers, of course, but the IQ distribution is narrower with a shorter "right-tail." To put this in context, a few million Swedes have contributed more to the advancement of civilization than billions of Chinese. As a thought experiment, try to imagine how the world would look if there were 1.4 billion Swedes or Jews.

    The entire world is still confined in its actions and aspirations by the imagination of an infinitesimal number of geniuses (both living and dead) overwhelming of Jewish or Protestant ancestry. Everyone else is a slave of their imagination; their lives will be spent materializing what the geniuses imagined.

    Just as the Chinese migrant laborers spent their energy to materialize the Protestant vision of California, the Chinese today spend their enormous energy materializing the Protestant-Jewish vision of the world. Whether the Chinese lead the development of fusion or quantum computing, they are still advancing a foreign vision and serving the foreign cult of genius. The Protestant-Jewish elite have always viewed the Chinese as docile and industrious--the ideal slave class. They have long wished that the whole world would be more like China.

    "Africa for the Chinese" (Galton, 1873):
    https://galton.org/letters/africa-for-chinese/AfricaForTheChinese.htm

    Replies: @Deep Thought, @Munga Bulga

    I have the feeling that Westerners really are smarter in original thought and inventions, while the Chinese are strong at taking other people’s inventions and produce stuff at “China prices” thereby making money by selling cheap.

    So, let the West wins all the Nobel Prizes and China does the manufacturing. I certainly won’t object to such a division of labour that employs the strengths of both to the benefit of all.

  • @Chinaman
    @Tyler Durden


    The Chinese drive forward where the roads have already been paved. They are not trailblazers and never have been.

    If China is doing something, you can bet your house it was done before.

    Just last week, the China claimed it achieved quantum supremacy


    �
    10 billion times faster than the google’s 53 qbit prototype? That cannot be true. Chinese cannot innovate and you can bet some white dude have done it two hundred year ago.

    Do you suffer any physical symptoms from the cognitive dissonance that this news must have induced? Must be quite embarrassing to have oneself proven wrong on an outrageous claim one made just a week ago.

    Anyway, it is quite disconcerting to see someone contradict himself so readily just so to pander to his host.

    The findings in your article on COVID as biowarfare blowback are indeed surprising.
    �
    Look, we don’t care about evidence on this site. Who needs empirical evidence when you can have conspiracy theories? Anything that contradicts any wild theory published on this site must be wrong. The paper below is definitely wrong.

    https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciaa1785/6012472

    Replies: @Tyler Durden, @Munga Bulga

    Neither Asia nor China are monolithic entities. The same can be said of the Caucasian world.

    Though the Chinese are highly intelligent on average, I would estimate per-capita genius in China to be on par with Pakistan, given the paucity of Nobel-worthy discoveries. There are Chinese outliers, of course, but the IQ distribution is narrower with a shorter “right-tail.” To put this in context, a few million Swedes have contributed more to the advancement of civilization than billions of Chinese. As a thought experiment, try to imagine how the world would look if there were 1.4 billion Swedes or Jews.

    The entire world is still confined in its actions and aspirations by the imagination of an infinitesimal number of geniuses (both living and dead) overwhelming of Jewish or Protestant ancestry. Everyone else is a slave of their imagination; their lives will be spent materializing what the geniuses imagined.

    Just as the Chinese migrant laborers spent their energy to materialize the Protestant vision of California, the Chinese today spend their enormous energy materializing the Protestant-Jewish vision of the world. Whether the Chinese lead the development of fusion or quantum computing, they are still advancing a foreign vision and serving the foreign cult of genius. The Protestant-Jewish elite have always viewed the Chinese as docile and industrious–the ideal slave class. They have long wished that the whole world would be more like China.

    “Africa for the Chinese” (Galton, 1873):
    https://galton.org/letters/africa-for-chinese/AfricaForTheChinese.htm

    •ï¿½Replies: @Deep Thought
    @Tyler Durden

    I have the feeling that Westerners really are smarter in original thought and inventions, while the Chinese are strong at taking other people's inventions and produce stuff at "China prices" thereby making money by selling cheap.

    So, let the West wins all the Nobel Prizes and China does the manufacturing. I certainly won't object to such a division of labour that employs the strengths of both to the benefit of all.
    , @Munga Bulga
    @Tyler Durden


    try to imagine how the world would look if there were 1.4 billion Swedes or Jews
    �
    Lol, is this retard for real?
    Either brutal extermination by the hands of thankfully long dead warlike Swedes or an even more insane liberal faggot dystopia than the (((west))) currently is.
    I havent seen any breakthrough from Sweden lately except in the export of poisonous liberalism.
    And you are furthering the myth of kike "geniuses" too. You are a stooge. All the talk about muh west and you are lumping in the plagiarizing kikes who forever taint European science.
    Fuck off.
  • @Tyler Durden
    @Ron Unz

    Mr. Unz,

    Thank you for the thorough reply. I’ve been thinking about it for quite some time.

    I added your articles to my fall reading list. "China's Rise, America's Fall" was excellent. I agree with the overarching thesis that the West has been preoccupied with trivialities (e.g., is Iraq democratic enough?) while China continues to vigorously build and advance.

    The findings in your article on COVID as biowarfare blowback are indeed surprising. Has new evidence emerged since April to support this theory?

    Just last week, the China claimed it achieved quantum supremacy, with a quantum computer based on Boson sampling which exceeds the speed of the most powerful supercomputers by a factor of 10^13. Perhaps all that state investment in science and technology is starting to pay off and your bullish vision of China will materialize much sooner than America's elites would like to believe.

    Replies: @Tyler Durden, @Chinaman

    The Chinese drive forward where the roads have already been paved. They are not trailblazers and never have been.

    If China is doing something, you can bet your house it was done before.

    Just last week, the China claimed it achieved quantum supremacy

    10 billion times faster than the google’s 53 qbit prototype? That cannot be true. Chinese cannot innovate and you can bet some white dude have done it two hundred year ago.

    Do you suffer any physical symptoms from the cognitive dissonance that this news must have induced? Must be quite embarrassing to have oneself proven wrong on an outrageous claim one made just a week ago.

    Anyway, it is quite disconcerting to see someone contradict himself so readily just so to pander to his host.

    The findings in your article on COVID as biowarfare blowback are indeed surprising.

    Look, we don’t care about evidence on this site. Who needs empirical evidence when you can have conspiracy theories? Anything that contradicts any wild theory published on this site must be wrong. The paper below is definitely wrong.

    https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciaa1785/6012472

    •ï¿½Replies: @Tyler Durden
    @Chinaman

    Neither Asia nor China are monolithic entities. The same can be said of the Caucasian world.

    Though the Chinese are highly intelligent on average, I would estimate per-capita genius in China to be on par with Pakistan, given the paucity of Nobel-worthy discoveries. There are Chinese outliers, of course, but the IQ distribution is narrower with a shorter "right-tail." To put this in context, a few million Swedes have contributed more to the advancement of civilization than billions of Chinese. As a thought experiment, try to imagine how the world would look if there were 1.4 billion Swedes or Jews.

    The entire world is still confined in its actions and aspirations by the imagination of an infinitesimal number of geniuses (both living and dead) overwhelming of Jewish or Protestant ancestry. Everyone else is a slave of their imagination; their lives will be spent materializing what the geniuses imagined.

    Just as the Chinese migrant laborers spent their energy to materialize the Protestant vision of California, the Chinese today spend their enormous energy materializing the Protestant-Jewish vision of the world. Whether the Chinese lead the development of fusion or quantum computing, they are still advancing a foreign vision and serving the foreign cult of genius. The Protestant-Jewish elite have always viewed the Chinese as docile and industrious--the ideal slave class. They have long wished that the whole world would be more like China.

    "Africa for the Chinese" (Galton, 1873):
    https://galton.org/letters/africa-for-chinese/AfricaForTheChinese.htm

    Replies: @Deep Thought, @Munga Bulga
    , @Munga Bulga
    @Chinaman

    They have no argument left. It is futile for you to attenmpt honest engagement with these sterile zombies.
    They, these so called "centrists" or "right-wing", with their negro level reasoning and halfwit sophistry, are the reason why the west is now the (((west))).
    Boohoo, asians are copying us. All the while forgetting the rule of nature and what we did to build our legacies. And the fact that nobody stopped the voluntary exchange of tech to Asia.
    Not to mention the fact that all of science and engineering are built on top of eachother.
    It is not even self pitying, it is drivel of impotency.

    The more time I spend observing these so called "right wingers", the more fatalistic I become.
  • @Tyler Durden
    @Ron Unz

    Mr. Unz,

    Thank you for the thorough reply. I’ve been thinking about it for quite some time.

    I added your articles to my fall reading list. "China's Rise, America's Fall" was excellent. I agree with the overarching thesis that the West has been preoccupied with trivialities (e.g., is Iraq democratic enough?) while China continues to vigorously build and advance.

    The findings in your article on COVID as biowarfare blowback are indeed surprising. Has new evidence emerged since April to support this theory?

    Just last week, the China claimed it achieved quantum supremacy, with a quantum computer based on Boson sampling which exceeds the speed of the most powerful supercomputers by a factor of 10^13. Perhaps all that state investment in science and technology is starting to pay off and your bullish vision of China will materialize much sooner than America's elites would like to believe.

    Replies: @Tyler Durden, @Chinaman

    I just rechecked, it’s 10^14; even more ominous.

  • @Ron Unz
    @Tyler Durden

    Thanks for the very kind words, and I regret my rather harsh remarks.

    China has always been a relatively passive nation tending to its own affairs. With 20-35% of the world’s population and a corresponding share of global GDP throughout pre-industrial history, the Chinese did not discover Australia, let alone the laws of motion. Dominating, discovering, and transforming the world is inherently aggressive; such behavior doesn’t fit the Chinese character.
    �
    Yes, I'd certainly agree that the Chinese have never been a particularly "adventurous" people, and I doubt that will much change. However, that's entirely different from continuing to pursue economic development and technological innovation, which have extremely practical value. Meanwhile, landing on the Moon or Mars are "prestige projects," beneficial for the international credibility they provide, much like successfully hosting the Olympics or winning a large share of the medals at the event. Anyway, the cost of such projects is rather negligible relative to regular Chinese investment.

    One may recall the numerous cases of Chinese expat students expelled for cheating or bribery. They arrived from a culture where such behavior is endemic and, possibly, partly genetic. China is a macrocosm of that phenomenon. In the race to get ahead, China routinely cheats. Theft of intellectual capital is real; ideas can be worth trillions of dollars in our technological world. China’s development model has transferred the profits of innovation from the global creative class to thieves.
    �
    I'm very skeptical of that perspective, which I suspect is mostly just anti-Chinese propaganda. Looking at news reports with a judicious eye, I've never seen much evidence of Chinese people being heavily involved in cheating or theft in American society, while certain other ethnic groups are clearly notorious in that category. I'd put most of that in the same category as the media Russigate nonsense about Putin the Evil stealing the American election.

    I think an important Chinese/East Asian characteristic is their tendency toward social conformity, so if they're raised in a cheating-is-fine society, they'll do so, but if not, then not. California has a large fraction of America's Chinese/East Asian population, and at least the American-born ones seem very "clean" to me.

    As for theft of international intellectual property, I'm extremely skeptical. I assume you're aware of the massive IP theft that was endemic during America's economic rise, as well as the wholesale looting in the aftermath of the world wars. Glass houses and all that...

    Jack Ma and Elon Musk hold debate in Shanghai:
    �
    Well, based on his public statements, Musk seems pathologically dishonest to me, and his car company is the leading example of the insane current Tech Bubble. I wouldn't be surprised if it loses 90-98% of its market value, at which point, he may be much less of a hero and role-model to his destroyed investors.

    On your broader analysis, I've been projecting and predicting China's huge rise to global economic dominance for well over 40 years now, and in some respects my extremely "bullish" estimates have even fallen short of the reality. Since I think you're a newcomer to this website, you might find some of my past articles of interest if you're not already familiar with them:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/chinas-rise-americas-fall/

    https://www.unz.com/runz/how-social-darwinism-made-modern-china-248/

    https://www.unz.com/runz/the-long-decline-of-the-london-economist/

    And on more immediate and recent issues, you might find my analysis in this article also quite "surprising":

    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-our-coronavirus-catastrophe-as-biowarfare-blowback/

    Replies: @Tyler Durden

    Mr. Unz,

    Thank you for the thorough reply. I’ve been thinking about it for quite some time.

    I added your articles to my fall reading list. “China’s Rise, America’s Fall” was excellent. I agree with the overarching thesis that the West has been preoccupied with trivialities (e.g., is Iraq democratic enough?) while China continues to vigorously build and advance.

    The findings in your article on COVID as biowarfare blowback are indeed surprising. Has new evidence emerged since April to support this theory?

    Just last week, the China claimed it achieved quantum supremacy, with a quantum computer based on Boson sampling which exceeds the speed of the most powerful supercomputers by a factor of 10^13. Perhaps all that state investment in science and technology is starting to pay off and your bullish vision of China will materialize much sooner than America’s elites would like to believe.

    •ï¿½Thanks: Ron Unz
    •ï¿½Replies: @Tyler Durden
    @Tyler Durden

    I just rechecked, it's 10^14; even more ominous.
    , @Chinaman
    @Tyler Durden


    The Chinese drive forward where the roads have already been paved. They are not trailblazers and never have been.

    If China is doing something, you can bet your house it was done before.

    Just last week, the China claimed it achieved quantum supremacy


    �
    10 billion times faster than the google’s 53 qbit prototype? That cannot be true. Chinese cannot innovate and you can bet some white dude have done it two hundred year ago.

    Do you suffer any physical symptoms from the cognitive dissonance that this news must have induced? Must be quite embarrassing to have oneself proven wrong on an outrageous claim one made just a week ago.

    Anyway, it is quite disconcerting to see someone contradict himself so readily just so to pander to his host.

    The findings in your article on COVID as biowarfare blowback are indeed surprising.
    �
    Look, we don’t care about evidence on this site. Who needs empirical evidence when you can have conspiracy theories? Anything that contradicts any wild theory published on this site must be wrong. The paper below is definitely wrong.

    https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciaa1785/6012472

    Replies: @Tyler Durden, @Munga Bulga
  • Smith says:
    @Philip Owen
    @Smith

    It's not as if the Europeans, other than the New World Spanish and Imperial Russia, set out to conquer new lands until the Scramble for Africa. They went to trade not conquer. The Dutch and the French were rather robust at times. The Portugese, Danes and the British less so. Local actors got greedy. That was a big mistake.

    Replies: @Smith

    Bitch please, trade is always preset for conquer.

    That’s why asians can never trust christians, especially the priests.

    They always come, peddle their bullshit cult, get killed and their home countries cry oppression and use their deaths to attack asian countries.

    This is why Asians must stay clear of Abrahamic cult, for some reasons, Islam seems to be relatively tame though, maybe because it embraces a bunch of asian traditions.

    •ï¿½LOL: Philip Owen
  • @Smith
    @Deep Thought

    & @ Astuteobservor II

    This must be famous “hurt feelings of the chinese people".

    I'm sorry, my chink friends, for your hurt feelings, but talking and discussion of China history in a topic about China isn't off-topic.

    @ d dan

    One question: is there any proof that Zheng He could "easily" set up colonies in these nations if he "tried" to?

    That's a funny thing to assume, because the Ming indeed put troops in Vietnam and were beaten back by Le Loi’s army who were tribesmen at the times. And Vietnam shares a land border with Ming China.

    The chinks love to play up Zheng He's fleets, but their actual military accomplishment in foreign land shows a different reality.

    I fear that after American exceptionalism, Chinese exceptionalism will be the next thing, where the talking point would be WE CHAYNESE COULDA CONQUA DA WHOLE WORLD WE JUST CHOSE NOT TO, and history repeats itself.

    Replies: @Deep Thought, @Astuteobservor II, @Philip Owen

    It’s not as if the Europeans, other than the New World Spanish and Imperial Russia, set out to conquer new lands until the Scramble for Africa. They went to trade not conquer. The Dutch and the French were rather robust at times. The Portugese, Danes and the British less so. Local actors got greedy. That was a big mistake.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Smith
    @Philip Owen

    Bitch please, trade is always preset for conquer.

    That's why asians can never trust christians, especially the priests.

    They always come, peddle their bullshit cult, get killed and their home countries cry oppression and use their deaths to attack asian countries.

    This is why Asians must stay clear of Abrahamic cult, for some reasons, Islam seems to be relatively tame though, maybe because it embraces a bunch of asian traditions.
  • @Barr
    @AaronB

    ' Sisi’s visit, Defence Secretary Michael Fallon announced that “the UK would establish a small military team in Egypt to counter terrorism and extremism.†As I have written about here, the spread of terrorism throughout the MENA region by NATO’s Libya operation has laid the groundwork for a renewed Western push to convince global South states that they need to deepen ‘military co-operation’ with the West. Thus, where economic dependence on Western finance and markets is in terminal decline (largely due to the rise of China), a new military dependence is being fostered. This is especially so for states such as Nigeria, Egypt and Iraq – one-time client states of the West gradually being pulled out of its orbit – with the West using the threat of terrorism as a means of forcing them back into the Western fold. A classic protection racket, in other words.'"

    Following Sinai bombing that brought Russian plane down ,this article was penned by

    9 th Nov 2015 WWW.COUNTERPUNCH.COM DANA GLAZEBROK

    Current military and jingoistic activities by US NATO refusal to consider withdrawing troops and ratcheting up pressure against China are part part of the picture that makes the decline of US as a nation a fact of near future With this development NATO would recoil back to the empty shell and a lot of countries's citizen would have a chance to think of life, politics and economy from a new perspective different from last 500 yrs.

    Replies: @Philip Owen

    Yet another country like Belarus, Ukraine, Jordan, Kuwait, the UAE, sometimes Georgia where there is a small British team providing training support. There may be others.

  • Smith says:
    @showmethereal
    @Smith

    2) Turtles hanging out in the sewer of NYC and eating pizza is Japanese culture? Ok - got ya

    3) do you have any sense??? that's what happens when you stick your nose in the wrong comments. that comment I made about HK was in relation to a conversation with another poster. the point I made to them is that Mainland China had zero interest in soft power. It was Hong Kong and Taiwan that pushed Chinese culture to the outside world. Do you even know the plots or the writing in Bruce Lee films??? He left no question about what he was pushing and it wasn't some hybrid. And ironically about Crouching Tiger is that though it was filmed in the Mainland and had some mainland stars - it was written and directed by Taiwanese. Had it been done by mainlanders they wouldn't have even cared to put it to the outside.

    5) Asians don't need soft power for other Asians. You are blabbering and based on your lack of critical thinking I doubt you are Asian

    6) westerners get politeness and empathy and hard work from Japan???? You really are nuts. I don't think you are Vietnamese at all. You must be Japanese. Also in case you didn't know race and culture are intertwined...

    Replies: @Smith

    You are typing frantically.

    1) Turtles that are trained in ninjutsu and fight with japanese weapons, learned from japanese virtues (fidelity to master, brotherly love between students), use zen meditation techniques to train and clear the mind, ARE not based on japanese culture? Really now, can you be THAT dishonest? Everyone loves TMNT because it’s not only turtles, it’s NINJA turtles.

    2) Mainland China had not, and that’s a FLAW, now they celebrate Bruce Lee and they make martial art films, so they in fact learn soft power from Bruce Lee. And yes, Bruce Lee style is a hybrid, he mixes in boxing and even ballet dancing in his style, because even he knows the traditional wing chun taught is fake as shit. And yes I watch Bruce Lee films you boomer, his famous ones like Fist of Fury is a Hong Kong jap revenge flick based on the legend of Shen Zhen (I do like the Jet Li version better), and Way of the Dragon, which is like the precursor of Street Fighter where he infiltrates a martial tournament and fight against other styles. And the point is while CTHD is filmed in China, is about China, but it doesn’t do much in Asia, I don’t know why, maybe they omit the screening.

    3) Now I know you aren’t an asian or at least some kind asian amelican mutt, asians huddle together in this white-controlled world, that’s why asian media is consumed by asian and why chinks like stuff like anime and jap samurai, and japs love chink martial artists and films. And viets love both.

    4) And yes, the westerners do get empathy, politeness and hard-working as part of japanese virtues, which is a bigger part in asian virtues. Again, YOUR analyst even says that! These are unmistakenly japanese and larger asian virtues, the westerners are about muh frankness, muh freedom, muh individuality.

    5) I don’t even know where you arrive at the part I’m japanese, but maybe because I’m actual asian, so my thinking is different than your and d dan who seem very westernized, but indeed, race and culture are intertwined, BUT both are equally important. There’s no point to all the race shit if you are some kind of “Asian amelican” mutt who grows up watching gangster movies and becomes some azn gangbangers. BUT there’s some good if asians grow up watching stuff like Bruce Lee movies, Akira Kurosawa movies or Dragonball, Mazinger Z or Doraemon, that shit BUILDScharacter and confidence for asian going forward and teaches what asian culture is.

    Again, putting race in a pedestal, that itself is a flaw of white nationalism, and why the white niggers in America degrade so much, they ONLY have vulgar racism. Asian nationalism must go deeper, which is the preservation of asian race AND culture, because nature and nurture are both important. I have a feeling asian americans are so fucked because aside from the fact they face outright racism, their community/culture link was cut from the homeland.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Showmethereal
    @Smith

    Yeah I have to type fast because I dont have so much spare time to reply back to you.

    1 - Actually the art of the ninja - like Zen buddhism are what Japan adapted from China. But in any event children watching it dont associate either of them with Japan nor China. You do realize that TMNT was not created by Japanese right? That is like saying Big Trouble in Little China or even Airbender counts as Chinese soft power. Maybe indirectly - but not directly.

    2 - already addressed... Bruce was clear on who he was and what he did. Some of my kindred were involved in that i dustry back then. Everyone in Hong Kong considered themselves Chinese then amd were taking up the mantle for the Chinese people. None of Bruce stuff he did in Hong Kong was meant to appease the west - even though he invited westerners. The whole point of his films was he was saving Chinese people from disgrace by westerners and Japanese. In fact much Hong Kong film in those days was about that. Many even were against Manchu rule during the Qing. You dont understand context.

    The rest of your comment is just unhinged

    Replies: @Smith
  • @Smith
    @Showmethereal

    Dealt with Deep Thought like a dog, now it's time to clean up this old boomer Singy chink.

    I will continue to insult you as long as you demonstrate your lack of understanding of culture and aesthetics, and show more outdated thinkings that leads asians to embrace isolationism.

    1) Ninja Gaiden is one of the most popular game series with the most prestige and critical reception on the market. Sales figures are not the only indication of popularity, word of mouth and critical reception also are.

    2) That's wrong, western kids clearly do know Pokemon is japanese, even your analyst shows that, and TMNT is inspired by japanese culture. Those aren't even my opinion, it's factual. And not only Pokemon, but Sonic, Mario, Zelda and even Dark Souls, all the western kids know these are jap games, hell, you can ask any kids (western or eastern).

    3) The fact HK is occupied by the brits doesn't mean the wuxia and martial art made by HKers movies extol anglo/western culture. Ironically, it's them who push chink culture to the West, and now (mainland) China copies them. For your knowledge, Bruce Lee's entire thing is that he modernizes the depiction of chinese martial arts in the western world and catches fame, the japanese revenge genre is popular in Hong Kong before him, but Bruce brought it to the world stage, and he did in a western tracksuit. Then he makes Hollywood movies and hire westerners to play fight with him. His philosophy follows the soft power of the japs, which is not the form (race), but the essence (culture) that is spread among all races in the world.

    4) No, Spirited Away did more overall (home office + international) than CTHD, that's what sales figures tell, 300 million vs 200 million. CTHD only does well ironically only in the US and the UK, even its Taiwan box office was small.

    5) Every asian (even vietnamese) back from the 90s onward consume jap manga, anime, video games as well as Hong Kong TVB shows, the fact you don't know this shows you aren't an asian, again, are you some kind of white boomer in hiding in Singy?

    6) Again wrong, jap culture nowadays is all over the west, from their virtues (hard working, empathy, politeness, order, even wackiness, found in all of their media), to their fashion, to their weapons and to their food, all brought abroad by their soft power. Meanwhile european and american goods are modified to japanese standards and cultural norms in Japan to fit Japan taste! You are clinging to RACIAL REPRESENTATION, not soft power, which is CULTURAL INFLUENCE. Ironically, Bruce Lee proves you wrong back then by modernizing his style and discard outdated traditions found in chinese martial arts and spreading that art to foreigners/westerners.

    Replies: @Deep Thought, @showmethereal

    2) Turtles hanging out in the sewer of NYC and eating pizza is Japanese culture? Ok – got ya

    3) do you have any sense??? that’s what happens when you stick your nose in the wrong comments. that comment I made about HK was in relation to a conversation with another poster. the point I made to them is that Mainland China had zero interest in soft power. It was Hong Kong and Taiwan that pushed Chinese culture to the outside world. Do you even know the plots or the writing in Bruce Lee films??? He left no question about what he was pushing and it wasn’t some hybrid. And ironically about Crouching Tiger is that though it was filmed in the Mainland and had some mainland stars – it was written and directed by Taiwanese. Had it been done by mainlanders they wouldn’t have even cared to put it to the outside.

    5) Asians don’t need soft power for other Asians. You are blabbering and based on your lack of critical thinking I doubt you are Asian

    6) westerners get politeness and empathy and hard work from Japan???? You really are nuts. I don’t think you are Vietnamese at all. You must be Japanese. Also in case you didn’t know race and culture are intertwined…

    •ï¿½Replies: @Smith
    @showmethereal

    You are typing frantically.

    1) Turtles that are trained in ninjutsu and fight with japanese weapons, learned from japanese virtues (fidelity to master, brotherly love between students), use zen meditation techniques to train and clear the mind, ARE not based on japanese culture? Really now, can you be THAT dishonest? Everyone loves TMNT because it's not only turtles, it's NINJA turtles.

    2) Mainland China had not, and that's a FLAW, now they celebrate Bruce Lee and they make martial art films, so they in fact learn soft power from Bruce Lee. And yes, Bruce Lee style is a hybrid, he mixes in boxing and even ballet dancing in his style, because even he knows the traditional wing chun taught is fake as shit. And yes I watch Bruce Lee films you boomer, his famous ones like Fist of Fury is a Hong Kong jap revenge flick based on the legend of Shen Zhen (I do like the Jet Li version better), and Way of the Dragon, which is like the precursor of Street Fighter where he infiltrates a martial tournament and fight against other styles. And the point is while CTHD is filmed in China, is about China, but it doesn't do much in Asia, I don't know why, maybe they omit the screening.

    3) Now I know you aren't an asian or at least some kind asian amelican mutt, asians huddle together in this white-controlled world, that's why asian media is consumed by asian and why chinks like stuff like anime and jap samurai, and japs love chink martial artists and films. And viets love both.

    4) And yes, the westerners do get empathy, politeness and hard-working as part of japanese virtues, which is a bigger part in asian virtues. Again, YOUR analyst even says that! These are unmistakenly japanese and larger asian virtues, the westerners are about muh frankness, muh freedom, muh individuality.

    5) I don't even know where you arrive at the part I'm japanese, but maybe because I'm actual asian, so my thinking is different than your and d dan who seem very westernized, but indeed, race and culture are intertwined, BUT both are equally important. There's no point to all the race shit if you are some kind of "Asian amelican" mutt who grows up watching gangster movies and becomes some azn gangbangers. BUT there's some good if asians grow up watching stuff like Bruce Lee movies, Akira Kurosawa movies or Dragonball, Mazinger Z or Doraemon, that shit BUILDScharacter and confidence for asian going forward and teaches what asian culture is.

    Again, putting race in a pedestal, that itself is a flaw of white nationalism, and why the white niggers in America degrade so much, they ONLY have vulgar racism. Asian nationalism must go deeper, which is the preservation of asian race AND culture, because nature and nurture are both important. I have a feeling asian americans are so fucked because aside from the fact they face outright racism, their community/culture link was cut from the homeland.

    Replies: @Showmethereal
  • @Smith
    @Showmethereal

    Dealt with Deep Thought like a dog, now it's time to clean up this old boomer Singy chink.

    I will continue to insult you as long as you demonstrate your lack of understanding of culture and aesthetics, and show more outdated thinkings that leads asians to embrace isolationism.

    1) Ninja Gaiden is one of the most popular game series with the most prestige and critical reception on the market. Sales figures are not the only indication of popularity, word of mouth and critical reception also are.

    2) That's wrong, western kids clearly do know Pokemon is japanese, even your analyst shows that, and TMNT is inspired by japanese culture. Those aren't even my opinion, it's factual. And not only Pokemon, but Sonic, Mario, Zelda and even Dark Souls, all the western kids know these are jap games, hell, you can ask any kids (western or eastern).

    3) The fact HK is occupied by the brits doesn't mean the wuxia and martial art made by HKers movies extol anglo/western culture. Ironically, it's them who push chink culture to the West, and now (mainland) China copies them. For your knowledge, Bruce Lee's entire thing is that he modernizes the depiction of chinese martial arts in the western world and catches fame, the japanese revenge genre is popular in Hong Kong before him, but Bruce brought it to the world stage, and he did in a western tracksuit. Then he makes Hollywood movies and hire westerners to play fight with him. His philosophy follows the soft power of the japs, which is not the form (race), but the essence (culture) that is spread among all races in the world.

    4) No, Spirited Away did more overall (home office + international) than CTHD, that's what sales figures tell, 300 million vs 200 million. CTHD only does well ironically only in the US and the UK, even its Taiwan box office was small.

    5) Every asian (even vietnamese) back from the 90s onward consume jap manga, anime, video games as well as Hong Kong TVB shows, the fact you don't know this shows you aren't an asian, again, are you some kind of white boomer in hiding in Singy?

    6) Again wrong, jap culture nowadays is all over the west, from their virtues (hard working, empathy, politeness, order, even wackiness, found in all of their media), to their fashion, to their weapons and to their food, all brought abroad by their soft power. Meanwhile european and american goods are modified to japanese standards and cultural norms in Japan to fit Japan taste! You are clinging to RACIAL REPRESENTATION, not soft power, which is CULTURAL INFLUENCE. Ironically, Bruce Lee proves you wrong back then by modernizing his style and discard outdated traditions found in chinese martial arts and spreading that art to foreigners/westerners.

    Replies: @Deep Thought, @showmethereal

    Practicing your house-niggery again, Smithie. This time towards the non-white Japs instead of white Russians!!!

  • Smith says:
    @Showmethereal
    @Smith

    You arent too bright... Classic example of someone who lacks reasoning ability - so has to resort to insults. And you are replying to a comment not directed at you but failed to address the one I did.

    1) No Ninja Gaiden was nowhere as popular. Sales tell the story.

    2) western kids did not think of teenage mutant ninja turtles nor Pokemon as Japanese.... Which in terms of Pokemon was on purpose. That is not my opinion.

    3) when Bruce Lee was alive Hong Kong was not China. It was a part of the British Empire. Its really sad how clueless you are. Bruce Lee's films were all about defending Chinese honor but he himself while ethnically Chinese was a US citizen who grew up in the British territory of Hong Kong. You really think you are smart but are clueless.

    Spritited Away did best in Japan and second best in China. Everywhere else it was a niche product. That is a fact of numbers not opinion.

    Are you pretending to be Japanese now? Did you forget you are supposed to be Japanese?

    End of story - your soft power is weak when you have to cater to foreigners to make yourself palatable. If you have real soft power they take you as you are. Americans and secondarily Europeans have real soft power. Asians do - but not so much in the western world. In the western world in spite of your prejudiced against Chinese opinion - Japanese are known as hard working - but little is really known about the overall culture.

    Replies: @Smith

    Dealt with Deep Thought like a dog, now it’s time to clean up this old boomer Singy chink.

    I will continue to insult you as long as you demonstrate your lack of understanding of culture and aesthetics, and show more outdated thinkings that leads asians to embrace isolationism.

    1) Ninja Gaiden is one of the most popular game series with the most prestige and critical reception on the market. Sales figures are not the only indication of popularity, word of mouth and critical reception also are.

    2) That’s wrong, western kids clearly do know Pokemon is japanese, even your analyst shows that, and TMNT is inspired by japanese culture. Those aren’t even my opinion, it’s factual. And not only Pokemon, but Sonic, Mario, Zelda and even Dark Souls, all the western kids know these are jap games, hell, you can ask any kids (western or eastern).

    3) The fact HK is occupied by the brits doesn’t mean the wuxia and martial art made by HKers movies extol anglo/western culture. Ironically, it’s them who push chink culture to the West, and now (mainland) China copies them. For your knowledge, Bruce Lee’s entire thing is that he modernizes the depiction of chinese martial arts in the western world and catches fame, the japanese revenge genre is popular in Hong Kong before him, but Bruce brought it to the world stage, and he did in a western tracksuit. Then he makes Hollywood movies and hire westerners to play fight with him. His philosophy follows the soft power of the japs, which is not the form (race), but the essence (culture) that is spread among all races in the world.

    4) No, Spirited Away did more overall (home office + international) than CTHD, that’s what sales figures tell, 300 million vs 200 million. CTHD only does well ironically only in the US and the UK, even its Taiwan box office was small.

    5) Every asian (even vietnamese) back from the 90s onward consume jap manga, anime, video games as well as Hong Kong TVB shows, the fact you don’t know this shows you aren’t an asian, again, are you some kind of white boomer in hiding in Singy?

    6) Again wrong, jap culture nowadays is all over the west, from their virtues (hard working, empathy, politeness, order, even wackiness, found in all of their media), to their fashion, to their weapons and to their food, all brought abroad by their soft power. Meanwhile european and american goods are modified to japanese standards and cultural norms in Japan to fit Japan taste! You are clinging to RACIAL REPRESENTATION, not soft power, which is CULTURAL INFLUENCE. Ironically, Bruce Lee proves you wrong back then by modernizing his style and discard outdated traditions found in chinese martial arts and spreading that art to foreigners/westerners.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Deep Thought
    @Smith

    Practicing your house-niggery again, Smithie. This time towards the non-white Japs instead of white Russians!!!
    , @showmethereal
    @Smith

    2) Turtles hanging out in the sewer of NYC and eating pizza is Japanese culture? Ok - got ya

    3) do you have any sense??? that's what happens when you stick your nose in the wrong comments. that comment I made about HK was in relation to a conversation with another poster. the point I made to them is that Mainland China had zero interest in soft power. It was Hong Kong and Taiwan that pushed Chinese culture to the outside world. Do you even know the plots or the writing in Bruce Lee films??? He left no question about what he was pushing and it wasn't some hybrid. And ironically about Crouching Tiger is that though it was filmed in the Mainland and had some mainland stars - it was written and directed by Taiwanese. Had it been done by mainlanders they wouldn't have even cared to put it to the outside.

    5) Asians don't need soft power for other Asians. You are blabbering and based on your lack of critical thinking I doubt you are Asian

    6) westerners get politeness and empathy and hard work from Japan???? You really are nuts. I don't think you are Vietnamese at all. You must be Japanese. Also in case you didn't know race and culture are intertwined...

    Replies: @Smith
  • @Smith
    @Deep Thought

    Aw look at the mad chink, flailing around, accusing everyone to be “backstab†him, first the viets, now the ruskies, I wonder what’s next? The entire world for not bowing to them LOL?

    The house-niggers in America of old “always stay true†to their white masters. You make me laugh by saying the same about Ho and the viets.
    �
    We stayed true to those allies who help us, respect us and do not invade us. The USSR is that, and remember chink, no USSR, no PRC. Mao was an opportunist who shakes hand with the devil to hurt his ally, the entire Sino-Soviet split was started by him wanting to be the biggest communist around, and the 3rd world friend spends his last days propping up terrorists in Cambodia, very funny.
    And no, Ho Chi Minh was no one’s puppet, his policy is Independence, no occupation from anyone, allies included.

    Then you are merely admitting you were saying crap with this “played both sides†comment earlier! Can you NOT bite your own tongue whenever you talk?
    �
    How? He played both sides when he was in power in the 60s, but then he becomes a chinkie CIA puppet, those two facts aren’t mutually exclusive.

    It was “no puppet government and can perform its own politics†only AFTER “ex-Khmer rouge party members†went “back into the governmentâ€â€“ you said that yourself!!! Something that the viets hate to see. “its own politics†is for Cambodian interest and against viet political control. The Cambodians do that because “They have suffered enough already†in the hands of the viets land murrikans.
    �
    Really now? They (Ex-Khmer Rouge) wanted to focus on Cambodian interests so much that they themselves terrorize and support those who bomb their own country? They are so sick by the viet and muricans that they are entirely funded by chinkies and muricans to be against viet? No, that’s not Cambodia’s interest, it is USA and China’s interest. Cambodia suffers the most during the reign of CIA and chink backed Pol Pot.

    SINCE “what the Cambodians do, it’s their businessâ€, then whatever Pol Pot did to other Cambodians must be Cambodian business! Therefore, it could NOT have been China’s fault. You contradict yourself yet again.
    �
    It is entirely China’s fault because China chooses to invade Vietnam in defense of Pol Pot, who attacks and massacres Vietnam IN Vietnam’s territories.

    The fact that the Cambodians accept Sihanouk descendant as royal head proves his symbolic political importance to the Cambodians.
    �
    You said it yourself, a symbolic figure, a puppet. So much for Cambodian liberation, all he does is being pushed around by greater powers and actual man-in-power like Hun Sen.

    Hun Sen is no longer a “viet-manâ€. He merely “played†the viets for his own ascendancy and the interests of his own country.
    �
    Hun Sen is a Cambodian, not a “viet-manâ€, he can choose to pursuit whatever cause he wishes, as long as he doesn’t make the same mistake of Pol Pot and invade Vietnam.

    There should NEVER have been a “Viet government in Cambodia†AT ALL– unless it was a puppet of the viets!!! If you can accept a “Viet government in Cambodiaâ€, why can’t you accept a “murrikan government†in namâ€??? Show some consistency, please!
    �
    The Viet government in Cambodia is created to safeguard the Cambodian people from CIA chinkies terrorists like Pol Pot, not to dominate and colonize natives like the murican government in Vietnam.

    Also, SINCE “what the Cambodians do, it’s their businessâ€, it therefore is up to the Cambodians to decide whether Cambodia should “allow liberal democracy and privatization†or not. It is NOT up to the viets to decide!!! What you have said merely betrays the viets’ imperialist intentions in Cambodia.
    �
    Is it in their interests though? Did they vote for that or is entirely pressure from US or China? Liberal democracy and privatization are not policies that help the common folks, and Cambodian suffer to this day due to these policies.

    Who is your “They� Why does “they†are cham or not matter? A very weird statement.
    �
    “They†are foreigners who aren’t even cham people? Why do they matter? If they care about cham people so much, they should visit Vietnam to see them.

    Not when they were being conquered and butchered by the viets.
    �
    As opposed to? Again, they are living peacefully in Vietnam.

    China has similar claims too. The fact is that nam has grabbed the most islets in SCS and almost ALL of what it has grabbed lie in other people’s economic zones according to the UNCLOS. And those other countries are NOT taking any actions against vietnam’s occupation of these islets. So, who is the aggressor?
    �
    LOL no, China’s claim is destroyed every times it’s brought up since it has NO historical artifacts or proof of colonization of these islands chains, and they are opposed by every maritime ASEAN countries because their nine-dash-line cuts deep into their EEZ, and actually enforced by a fleet of militia and fishermen that start trouble all over the region. Meanwhile, Vietnam’s holding of these islands are entirely a reaction to chink’s illegal island grab.

    Uncle Ho was also “whisked away†in China in his younger days. If I remember correctly, he actually became a member of the CCP. When it was his time to liberate his country from the French and the murrikans, China gave him ALL the “guns and weapons for freeâ€â€“ and MORE. So again, you seem to believe that the viets have UNLIMITED entitlements from whoever they want, but others canNOT even have one bit!!! Very strange, and ungrateful, mentality that is special to the viets!!!
    �
    Uncle Ho was a member of MANY communist parties, even in Europe, he cooperated with the CCP and the CCCP and received aids from all the 2nd world bloc. He isn’t beholden to China. The chinks, meanwhile, only wanted him to hold the North because they wanted a way to appease the muricans, to repeat the North vs South Korea situation. Uncle Ho told them to fuck off. And no, chinkie imperialist like you, who think he’s “entitled†to vassal, can fuck right off.

    Like Ho and his gang was– See the links about massacres of innocent Vietnamese by the vietcong and north viet armies. Again, according to you, only the viets are entitled to do that but the Cambodians can’t– even when doing evil!
    �
    These were mistakes in war or land reforms, which happen in every revolution ever, it cannot be compared to the likes of Pol Pot, who massacres his own people and other ethnics, got ousted, then got paid by CIA chinkies to become a bandit in Thailand’s border to kill more and rob more.

    The wrong-doings were Pol Pot’s in Cambodia, and Ho’s and his gang’s when the same of things were done in nam. Why blame China for them?
    �
    The wrong-doings were not limited in Cambodia, Pol Pot invaded and massacred Vietnamese in Vietnam’s territory, and thus prompted the Viet invasion. Meanwhile, Vietnam has done nothing against China, but get immediately invaded because it dares stop Pol Pot. And when Vietnam comes to Cambodia to help stabilize things, muricans and chinkies team up to fund Pol Pot and Sihanouk for 10 years to rob, kill and sanctions both Cambodia and Vietnam. So yes, it is China’s fault, hell, it is China’s crimes.

    The Pol Pot and Sihanouk combination saved their country by making Cambodia nam’s OWN “Vietnamâ€. The Sihanouk family are accepted and respected by the Cambodian people as their royal family– something that the delusional viet choose to pretend otherwise.
    �
    Nah, Pol Pot and Sihanouk combined to form banditry, with no government, no policy to help people, but just to steal and rob, with foreign funding, Vietnam didn’t encounter “Vietnam†in Cambodia, but CIA chinkies terrorists. Vietnam is forced back by the unjust massive sanctions by the whole world (China included), not these bandits. Sihanouk, meanwhile, goes back to be a little puppet, cared by Hun Sen LOL and Pol Pot lies death in the jungle like the bandit he is.

    Ho would have been driven into the South China Sea had Mao not promised to intervene massively on his, and nam’s, behalf if the murrikan armies dared to cross into north nam. Ho and his gang turned ungrateful back-stabbers afterwards. That is why the Chinese don’t trust the viets anymore.
    �
    Mao can promise the sea, but it was the threat of USSR’s nukes that helps deter the americans. And I like the fact you think Uncle Ho is a “back-stabberâ€, while it’s you chinks who back-stab the USSR and Vietnam and the whole 2nd bloc by shaking hands with Great Satan.

    “Grantedâ€, yes, “grantedâ€, a very revealing word– about YOU that is! When I was in England…
    �
    Oh, another “Asian amelicanâ€, as expected. And yes, granted, you read that right. Seethe more chink dog, that word is 100% accurate, the USSR granted these terriroties back to chinkies, they pity those dogs and of course, these dogs want more and more and more. They want their imperial territories back, not solidary or helping the world.

    Before his unfortunate early death, Lenin did offer to return to China territories grabbed by Tsarist Russia.
    �
    Yeah, I’m sure he would offer them to the Kuomingtan, another bunch of capitalist imperialist.

    This “house-nigger†mentality may be an innate instinct of the viets, but it is NOT a Chinese one. You are indeed winning your well-deserved, and “deliciousâ€, position of being a house-nigger of the white Russians, and probably white murrikans too. It is so refreshing to know your inner thought!
    �
    Truly “Asian amelicanâ€, their thinking is alien to actual asian, what we have is respect, trust and friendship to our allies. Meanwhile you chinks scream “house-nigger†while backstabbing the USSR, and every your allies to side with Great Satan and destabilize your own neighbors. You have the “treacherous dog’ mentality, and that’s why you will go down.

    If that is true, it means that the Chinese leaders were wedded to the interest of China and the Chinese people.
    �
    If the interest of the Chinese people and China is to backstab, ruin alliance and shake hands with Great Satan to hurt their own allies and neighbors, the Chinese people and China do not deserve anything because they would be “treacherous dogsâ€.

    Khrushchev had already made its own “rapprochement†with murrika– behind China’s back– until he was “fucked†(your word) by Kennedy and then he lost power. And Brezhnev had asked murrika’s permission for nuking China but was REFUSED. What makes you think that only the viets have the right to look after thier own security and interest but the Chinese don’t have that right to defend themselves from the back-stabbing Russians and viets???!!! YOU are “beyond ridiculousâ€!
    �
    Ah yes, great logic, Kruschev and Breznev “backstabbed†China by wanting to co-exist with the muricans but not wanting to side with muricans to attack China, so what’s Mao gonna do? Of course, team up with muricans and together with them fuck the USSR. Great logic of a treacherous, Cao Cao-like mentality. Now of course, anyone who is against this duplicity is an “Asian amelikanâ€, never mind the fact China being the best and most loyal “Asian amelikan†who now wishes to co-exist and have great friendship with their master whiteys.
    LOL, yes, beyond ridiculous. At first I feel angry, now I just feel pity for you, chink dog.

    Replies: @Deep Thought, @Deep Thought

    House-niggers staying true to their white masters:

    https://ccnmtl.columbia.edu/projects/mmt/mxp/speeches/mxt29.html

    Malcolm tells the parable of “house Negro.”

  • @Smith
    @Deep Thought

    Aw look at the mad chink, flailing around, accusing everyone to be “backstab†him, first the viets, now the ruskies, I wonder what’s next? The entire world for not bowing to them LOL?

    The house-niggers in America of old “always stay true†to their white masters. You make me laugh by saying the same about Ho and the viets.
    �
    We stayed true to those allies who help us, respect us and do not invade us. The USSR is that, and remember chink, no USSR, no PRC. Mao was an opportunist who shakes hand with the devil to hurt his ally, the entire Sino-Soviet split was started by him wanting to be the biggest communist around, and the 3rd world friend spends his last days propping up terrorists in Cambodia, very funny.
    And no, Ho Chi Minh was no one’s puppet, his policy is Independence, no occupation from anyone, allies included.

    Then you are merely admitting you were saying crap with this “played both sides†comment earlier! Can you NOT bite your own tongue whenever you talk?
    �
    How? He played both sides when he was in power in the 60s, but then he becomes a chinkie CIA puppet, those two facts aren’t mutually exclusive.

    It was “no puppet government and can perform its own politics†only AFTER “ex-Khmer rouge party members†went “back into the governmentâ€â€“ you said that yourself!!! Something that the viets hate to see. “its own politics†is for Cambodian interest and against viet political control. The Cambodians do that because “They have suffered enough already†in the hands of the viets land murrikans.
    �
    Really now? They (Ex-Khmer Rouge) wanted to focus on Cambodian interests so much that they themselves terrorize and support those who bomb their own country? They are so sick by the viet and muricans that they are entirely funded by chinkies and muricans to be against viet? No, that’s not Cambodia’s interest, it is USA and China’s interest. Cambodia suffers the most during the reign of CIA and chink backed Pol Pot.

    SINCE “what the Cambodians do, it’s their businessâ€, then whatever Pol Pot did to other Cambodians must be Cambodian business! Therefore, it could NOT have been China’s fault. You contradict yourself yet again.
    �
    It is entirely China’s fault because China chooses to invade Vietnam in defense of Pol Pot, who attacks and massacres Vietnam IN Vietnam’s territories.

    The fact that the Cambodians accept Sihanouk descendant as royal head proves his symbolic political importance to the Cambodians.
    �
    You said it yourself, a symbolic figure, a puppet. So much for Cambodian liberation, all he does is being pushed around by greater powers and actual man-in-power like Hun Sen.

    Hun Sen is no longer a “viet-manâ€. He merely “played†the viets for his own ascendancy and the interests of his own country.
    �
    Hun Sen is a Cambodian, not a “viet-manâ€, he can choose to pursuit whatever cause he wishes, as long as he doesn’t make the same mistake of Pol Pot and invade Vietnam.

    There should NEVER have been a “Viet government in Cambodia†AT ALL– unless it was a puppet of the viets!!! If you can accept a “Viet government in Cambodiaâ€, why can’t you accept a “murrikan government†in namâ€??? Show some consistency, please!
    �
    The Viet government in Cambodia is created to safeguard the Cambodian people from CIA chinkies terrorists like Pol Pot, not to dominate and colonize natives like the murican government in Vietnam.

    Also, SINCE “what the Cambodians do, it’s their businessâ€, it therefore is up to the Cambodians to decide whether Cambodia should “allow liberal democracy and privatization†or not. It is NOT up to the viets to decide!!! What you have said merely betrays the viets’ imperialist intentions in Cambodia.
    �
    Is it in their interests though? Did they vote for that or is entirely pressure from US or China? Liberal democracy and privatization are not policies that help the common folks, and Cambodian suffer to this day due to these policies.

    Who is your “They� Why does “they†are cham or not matter? A very weird statement.
    �
    “They†are foreigners who aren’t even cham people? Why do they matter? If they care about cham people so much, they should visit Vietnam to see them.

    Not when they were being conquered and butchered by the viets.
    �
    As opposed to? Again, they are living peacefully in Vietnam.

    China has similar claims too. The fact is that nam has grabbed the most islets in SCS and almost ALL of what it has grabbed lie in other people’s economic zones according to the UNCLOS. And those other countries are NOT taking any actions against vietnam’s occupation of these islets. So, who is the aggressor?
    �
    LOL no, China’s claim is destroyed every times it’s brought up since it has NO historical artifacts or proof of colonization of these islands chains, and they are opposed by every maritime ASEAN countries because their nine-dash-line cuts deep into their EEZ, and actually enforced by a fleet of militia and fishermen that start trouble all over the region. Meanwhile, Vietnam’s holding of these islands are entirely a reaction to chink’s illegal island grab.

    Uncle Ho was also “whisked away†in China in his younger days. If I remember correctly, he actually became a member of the CCP. When it was his time to liberate his country from the French and the murrikans, China gave him ALL the “guns and weapons for freeâ€â€“ and MORE. So again, you seem to believe that the viets have UNLIMITED entitlements from whoever they want, but others canNOT even have one bit!!! Very strange, and ungrateful, mentality that is special to the viets!!!
    �
    Uncle Ho was a member of MANY communist parties, even in Europe, he cooperated with the CCP and the CCCP and received aids from all the 2nd world bloc. He isn’t beholden to China. The chinks, meanwhile, only wanted him to hold the North because they wanted a way to appease the muricans, to repeat the North vs South Korea situation. Uncle Ho told them to fuck off. And no, chinkie imperialist like you, who think he’s “entitled†to vassal, can fuck right off.

    Like Ho and his gang was– See the links about massacres of innocent Vietnamese by the vietcong and north viet armies. Again, according to you, only the viets are entitled to do that but the Cambodians can’t– even when doing evil!
    �
    These were mistakes in war or land reforms, which happen in every revolution ever, it cannot be compared to the likes of Pol Pot, who massacres his own people and other ethnics, got ousted, then got paid by CIA chinkies to become a bandit in Thailand’s border to kill more and rob more.

    The wrong-doings were Pol Pot’s in Cambodia, and Ho’s and his gang’s when the same of things were done in nam. Why blame China for them?
    �
    The wrong-doings were not limited in Cambodia, Pol Pot invaded and massacred Vietnamese in Vietnam’s territory, and thus prompted the Viet invasion. Meanwhile, Vietnam has done nothing against China, but get immediately invaded because it dares stop Pol Pot. And when Vietnam comes to Cambodia to help stabilize things, muricans and chinkies team up to fund Pol Pot and Sihanouk for 10 years to rob, kill and sanctions both Cambodia and Vietnam. So yes, it is China’s fault, hell, it is China’s crimes.

    The Pol Pot and Sihanouk combination saved their country by making Cambodia nam’s OWN “Vietnamâ€. The Sihanouk family are accepted and respected by the Cambodian people as their royal family– something that the delusional viet choose to pretend otherwise.
    �
    Nah, Pol Pot and Sihanouk combined to form banditry, with no government, no policy to help people, but just to steal and rob, with foreign funding, Vietnam didn’t encounter “Vietnam†in Cambodia, but CIA chinkies terrorists. Vietnam is forced back by the unjust massive sanctions by the whole world (China included), not these bandits. Sihanouk, meanwhile, goes back to be a little puppet, cared by Hun Sen LOL and Pol Pot lies death in the jungle like the bandit he is.

    Ho would have been driven into the South China Sea had Mao not promised to intervene massively on his, and nam’s, behalf if the murrikan armies dared to cross into north nam. Ho and his gang turned ungrateful back-stabbers afterwards. That is why the Chinese don’t trust the viets anymore.
    �
    Mao can promise the sea, but it was the threat of USSR’s nukes that helps deter the americans. And I like the fact you think Uncle Ho is a “back-stabberâ€, while it’s you chinks who back-stab the USSR and Vietnam and the whole 2nd bloc by shaking hands with Great Satan.

    “Grantedâ€, yes, “grantedâ€, a very revealing word– about YOU that is! When I was in England…
    �
    Oh, another “Asian amelicanâ€, as expected. And yes, granted, you read that right. Seethe more chink dog, that word is 100% accurate, the USSR granted these terriroties back to chinkies, they pity those dogs and of course, these dogs want more and more and more. They want their imperial territories back, not solidary or helping the world.

    Before his unfortunate early death, Lenin did offer to return to China territories grabbed by Tsarist Russia.
    �
    Yeah, I’m sure he would offer them to the Kuomingtan, another bunch of capitalist imperialist.

    This “house-nigger†mentality may be an innate instinct of the viets, but it is NOT a Chinese one. You are indeed winning your well-deserved, and “deliciousâ€, position of being a house-nigger of the white Russians, and probably white murrikans too. It is so refreshing to know your inner thought!
    �
    Truly “Asian amelicanâ€, their thinking is alien to actual asian, what we have is respect, trust and friendship to our allies. Meanwhile you chinks scream “house-nigger†while backstabbing the USSR, and every your allies to side with Great Satan and destabilize your own neighbors. You have the “treacherous dog’ mentality, and that’s why you will go down.

    If that is true, it means that the Chinese leaders were wedded to the interest of China and the Chinese people.
    �
    If the interest of the Chinese people and China is to backstab, ruin alliance and shake hands with Great Satan to hurt their own allies and neighbors, the Chinese people and China do not deserve anything because they would be “treacherous dogsâ€.

    Khrushchev had already made its own “rapprochement†with murrika– behind China’s back– until he was “fucked†(your word) by Kennedy and then he lost power. And Brezhnev had asked murrika’s permission for nuking China but was REFUSED. What makes you think that only the viets have the right to look after thier own security and interest but the Chinese don’t have that right to defend themselves from the back-stabbing Russians and viets???!!! YOU are “beyond ridiculousâ€!
    �
    Ah yes, great logic, Kruschev and Breznev “backstabbed†China by wanting to co-exist with the muricans but not wanting to side with muricans to attack China, so what’s Mao gonna do? Of course, team up with muricans and together with them fuck the USSR. Great logic of a treacherous, Cao Cao-like mentality. Now of course, anyone who is against this duplicity is an “Asian amelikanâ€, never mind the fact China being the best and most loyal “Asian amelikan†who now wishes to co-exist and have great friendship with their master whiteys.
    LOL, yes, beyond ridiculous. At first I feel angry, now I just feel pity for you, chink dog.

    Replies: @Deep Thought, @Deep Thought

    We stayed true to those allies who help us, respect us and do not invade us.

    House-niggers ALWAYS “stayed true” to their white masters.

    Mao was an opportunist who shakes hand with the devil to hurt his ally,

    Khrushchev was the opportunist who “shook hands” with Kennedy in order to hurt China and got “fucked” by Kennedy– not China– instead. Brezhnev wanted to nuke China with murrika’s consent but got rebuffed.

    He played both sides when he was in power in the 60s, but then he becomes a chinkie CIA puppet, those two facts aren’t mutually exclusive.

    If he indeed played both sides, then he was the puppet master, instead of the puppet.

    All the others are also recycled craps from you that I have already ridiculed.

    The ungrateful viets:

    Chinese Support for North Vietnam during the Vietnam War: The Decisive Edge
    by Bob Seals

    “Thus the highest realization of warfare is to attack the enemy plans;†according to the learned military theorist Sun-Tzu in the Art of War. [69] In respects this is exactly what the North Vietnamese, and Chinese did in both Vietnam Wars: they successfully attacked the Western powers war plans. The considerable support for the DRV by the PRC, to include a promise to intervene with massive numbers of troops in the event of an invasion of North Vietnam, effectively eliminated this course of action, and perhaps others, as potential war winning options for the West. Thus, with the support of China, on a strategic level of war the DRV was able to remain upon the offensive throughout the war, maintaining the initiative and finally achieving victory as Saigon fell in April of 1975.

    .

  • I still don’t buy the argument that China’s per capita GDP will increase to 20K, and then stop, as if that is some kind of immutable law. That no country outside the West will ever get past the middle income trap. It’s nonsense really.

    The surprising thing is not that China’s GDP per capita is increasing but that it isn’t in fact higher than most Western countries. They have a smarter, more unified, technologically gifted population, with no dumbing down of their education system, no affirmative action, no huge racial problems and to my mind less corruption. The also don’t have a global empire to maintain, and to my mind no desire for one. A local hegemony, maybe.

    Why then is their urban GDP ( at least) not able to catch up to the West? It is, as we know, catching up on Eastern Europe.

    All the supposed minefields in their future ( ageing and debt for instance) are either solvable or not a real issue, and/or are worse for the west or America.

  • @Smith
    @showmethereal

    Now lemme deal with the old singy chink.

    1) is Ninja Gaiden even REMOTELY as popular as franchises that I named like Super Mario or Sonic – or Legend of Zelda???? No – not even remotely.
    �
    Ninja Gaiden is one of the best franchises ever and widely recognized by people who play video games. If you search best games ever, you would find Ninja Gaiden. And Super Mario, Sonic, and Legend of Zelda are Japanese games, no matter how you think.

    2) you are talking about 2016 – I’m talking about the 1980’s… You seem to miss that fact.. And for the record Sony moved it’s videogame division headquarters to the US now. Also I looked up “Dark Soulsâ€. What on earth does that have to do with Japan and Japanese culture?????
    �
    2016 is the foundation for 1980, the 1980s is the ninja and samurai boom where you see even western movies making films about ninja and samurai, and who can forget Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles?
    And what on Earth does Dark Souls have to do with Japanese culture? Aside from Japanese characters, Japanese weapons, Japanese fighting styles, and Japanese themes on the cosmic and Buddhist cycle of life? What is with this boomer? He can only see the external?

    3) China never wanted to popularize martial arts in the first place. You don’t get it that’s why Bruce Lee became who he became. He involved westerners in martial arts and is more famous than any Japanese star. My point is China didn’t seek to appease the west… The Japanese did after WW2.
    �
    What do you mean China doesn’t? Is Hong Kong not China now? HK martial arts movies basically launch Bruce Lee and interest in wuxia and Chinese history. The fact (mainland) China “didn’t seek to appease the west†is wrong, considering immediately when China gets rich, it funds copycats of HK films and TV shows.

    4) false…. Western powers control western society and who is seen as good and who is seen as bad.
    �
    The fact you care about how much western culture/society cares about Asian media shows that your brain has been rotten. It doesn’t matter one bit on what is their perception of Asian media. Asian media continues to grow and has successfully captured their market and gain a following, despite their pushback.

    Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon is the highest grossing foreign language film in US history… What are you talking about?
    �
    OK, legit mistake there, but Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon did good in the US, but not so well in Asia, while Spirited Away does well in both and ends up grossing more as a result.

    Anime was NOT mainstream in western markets until the 2000’s when cartoon channels started to play it. Prior to the 2000’s it was very much a niche market… If it had a Japanese theme it was even MORE of a niche.
    �
    Anime earns a cult status and every cool kids know anime like Akira, GoTS, and the whole world loves Doraemon, Dragon Ball Z, Mazinger Z or Gundam. Do you live in the US as a kid or something? The fact anime becomes mainstream in the US and even topples western cartoons and comics show their strength and foundation since the 80s.

    And finally – an analyst who breaks down the Japanese tailoring their games to meet the whims of the western market.
    �
    Even the analyst disagrees with you:

    The decision to Americanize the TV show carries with it a number of ironies. First, despite the adaptation of the show described above, various aspects of the show including plot lines and relationships between characters can be easily read as Japanese. A column in the New York Times (Strom, 1999 November 7) argued that, in fact, Pokemon served to teach American children such traditional Japanese values as empathy and perseverance at all costs. Second, the Japanese origin of the program, for many children, is not a negative but in fact an important part of the show/phenomenon's attractiveness. Japan is well-known by young video game players (particularly those tied into the internet) to be the source of most signficant video game innovations; anime is also gradually building an image as "cutting-edge" entertainment. The show, therefore, is used by some to gain knowledge of Japanese culture and access to the cutting edge.
    �
    Even when they changes the exterior of Pokemon to be more westernized, it still introduces Japanese culture and thus increasing its soft power in the West, and even making Japan "cool".
    As demonstrated, you have no understanding of culture or aesthetics. You see the exterior and not knowing the interior, are you secretly an old murican boomer who lives in Singy?

    Replies: @Showmethereal

    You arent too bright… Classic example of someone who lacks reasoning ability – so has to resort to insults. And you are replying to a comment not directed at you but failed to address the one I did.

    1) No Ninja Gaiden was nowhere as popular. Sales tell the story.

    2) western kids did not think of teenage mutant ninja turtles nor Pokemon as Japanese…. Which in terms of Pokemon was on purpose. That is not my opinion.

    3) when Bruce Lee was alive Hong Kong was not China. It was a part of the British Empire. Its really sad how clueless you are. Bruce Lee’s films were all about defending Chinese honor but he himself while ethnically Chinese was a US citizen who grew up in the British territory of Hong Kong. You really think you are smart but are clueless.

    Spritited Away did best in Japan and second best in China. Everywhere else it was a niche product. That is a fact of numbers not opinion.

    Are you pretending to be Japanese now? Did you forget you are supposed to be Japanese?

    End of story – your soft power is weak when you have to cater to foreigners to make yourself palatable. If you have real soft power they take you as you are. Americans and secondarily Europeans have real soft power. Asians do – but not so much in the western world. In the western world in spite of your prejudiced against Chinese opinion – Japanese are known as hard working – but little is really known about the overall culture.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Smith
    @Showmethereal

    Dealt with Deep Thought like a dog, now it's time to clean up this old boomer Singy chink.

    I will continue to insult you as long as you demonstrate your lack of understanding of culture and aesthetics, and show more outdated thinkings that leads asians to embrace isolationism.

    1) Ninja Gaiden is one of the most popular game series with the most prestige and critical reception on the market. Sales figures are not the only indication of popularity, word of mouth and critical reception also are.

    2) That's wrong, western kids clearly do know Pokemon is japanese, even your analyst shows that, and TMNT is inspired by japanese culture. Those aren't even my opinion, it's factual. And not only Pokemon, but Sonic, Mario, Zelda and even Dark Souls, all the western kids know these are jap games, hell, you can ask any kids (western or eastern).

    3) The fact HK is occupied by the brits doesn't mean the wuxia and martial art made by HKers movies extol anglo/western culture. Ironically, it's them who push chink culture to the West, and now (mainland) China copies them. For your knowledge, Bruce Lee's entire thing is that he modernizes the depiction of chinese martial arts in the western world and catches fame, the japanese revenge genre is popular in Hong Kong before him, but Bruce brought it to the world stage, and he did in a western tracksuit. Then he makes Hollywood movies and hire westerners to play fight with him. His philosophy follows the soft power of the japs, which is not the form (race), but the essence (culture) that is spread among all races in the world.

    4) No, Spirited Away did more overall (home office + international) than CTHD, that's what sales figures tell, 300 million vs 200 million. CTHD only does well ironically only in the US and the UK, even its Taiwan box office was small.

    5) Every asian (even vietnamese) back from the 90s onward consume jap manga, anime, video games as well as Hong Kong TVB shows, the fact you don't know this shows you aren't an asian, again, are you some kind of white boomer in hiding in Singy?

    6) Again wrong, jap culture nowadays is all over the west, from their virtues (hard working, empathy, politeness, order, even wackiness, found in all of their media), to their fashion, to their weapons and to their food, all brought abroad by their soft power. Meanwhile european and american goods are modified to japanese standards and cultural norms in Japan to fit Japan taste! You are clinging to RACIAL REPRESENTATION, not soft power, which is CULTURAL INFLUENCE. Ironically, Bruce Lee proves you wrong back then by modernizing his style and discard outdated traditions found in chinese martial arts and spreading that art to foreigners/westerners.

    Replies: @Deep Thought, @showmethereal
  • Smith says:
    December 2, 2020 at 1:54 pm GMT •ï¿½1,900 Words
    @Deep Thought
    @Smith


    So you are asking question despite knowing the answers. And no, Ho Chi Minh has always stayed true to his ally and teacher, the USSR. Mao was an ally of the USSR but turns against it, and the whole 2nd world.
    �
    The house-niggers in America of old "always stay true" to their white masters. You make me laugh by saying the same about Ho and the viets.

    Mao was a leader of China and a friend of the 3rd world countries. He was his OWN master. Khrushchev and Brezhnev, who wanted Mao to be merely a bigger Ho and turned against China. They found out the hard way.

    On the other hand, it was Ho, and his gang, who back-stabbed Mao, and China, despite the crucial role the latter had played in helping the former to unite their country.

    Again, no, he was a puppet pushed around by Beijing and CIA, one day Beijing tells him to go lick Pol Pot’s ass, another day Beijing tells him to go the UN. His strings are high above.
    �
    Then you are merely admitting you were saying crap with this "played both sides" comment earlier! Can you NOT bite your own tongue whenever you talk?

    That shows it is no puppet government and can perform its own politics, and no, what the Cambodians do, it’s their business. They have suffered enough already.
    �
    It was "no puppet government and can perform its own politics" only AFTER “ex-Khmer rouge party members†went “back into the governmentâ€-- you said that yourself!!! Something that the viets hate to see. "its own politics" is for Cambodian interest and against viet political control. The Cambodians do that because "They have suffered enough already" in the hands of the viets land murrikans.

    SINCE "what the Cambodians do, it’s their business", then whatever Pol Pot did to other Cambodians must be Cambodian business! Therefore, it could NOT have been China's fault. You contradict yourself yet again.

    The Cambodian’s Royal head is entirely for show, the power lies in the government head by Hun Sen.
    �
    Aren't "Royal heads" normally "for show"??? Does the British royal family have real political power, for example? Do you have what we call "commonsense"???

    The fact that the Cambodians accept Sihanouk descendant as royal head proves his symbolic political importance to the Cambodians.

    Hun Sen is no longer a "viet-man". He merely "played" the viets for his own ascendancy and the interests of his own country.

    It’s true, the Viet government in Cambodia was damaged post 90s by the meddling of the UN, americans and China, that’s why it allows liberal democracy and privatization,...
    �
    There should NEVER have been a "Viet government in Cambodia" AT ALL-- unless it was a puppet of the viets!!! If you can accept a "Viet government in Cambodia", why can't you accept a "murrikan government" in nam"??? Show some consistency, please!

    Also, SINCE "what the Cambodians do, it’s their business", it therefore is up to the Cambodians to decide whether Cambodia should "allow liberal democracy and privatization" or not. It is NOT up to the viets to decide!!! What you have said merely betrays the viets' imperialist intentions in Cambodia.

    I google that and look at what I found:
    https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/vietnamese-conquest-of-muslim-hindu-cham-and-their-current-situation.265898/
    Oh yes, more enraged foreigners about cham people, they are not even cham LOL and
    �
    Who is your "They"? Why does "they" are cham or not matter? A very weird statement.

    again btw, the cham people nowadays live freely in Vietnam.
    �
    Not when they were being conquered and butchered by the viets.

    You mean Paracels/Hoang Sa, no, both island chains we have been colonized by the viets since the 15th century.
    And now, we don’t even want either of them, but just clear UNCLOS following the UN laws.
    �
    China has similar claims too. The fact is that nam has grabbed the most islets in SCS and almost ALL of what it has grabbed lie in other people's economic zones according to the UNCLOS. And those other countries are NOT taking any actions against vietnam's occupation of these islets. So, who is the aggressor?

    China whisks away Sihanouk and then stores him in Pyongjang, and only summons him back as a face for CIA bandits to rally upon LOL even the Khmer rouge, his unlikely ally, hates his coward ass but uses his “royalty†as casus belli. And I didn’t know “diplomatic dialogues†involves literally sending him guns and weapons for free.
    �
    Uncle Ho was also "whisked away" in China in his younger days. If I remember correctly, he actually became a member of the CCP. When it was his time to liberate his country from the French and the murrikans, China gave him ALL the "guns and weapons for free"-- and MORE. So again, you seem to believe that the viets have UNLIMITED entitlements from whoever they want, but others canNOT even have one bit!!! Very strange, and ungrateful, mentality that is special to the viets!!!

    No, he doesn’t. He works directly with CIA and chinks in order to terrorize his own country near the Thailand’s border, working with Pol Pot. In fact, he’s the troublemaker.
    �
    Like Ho and his gang was-- See the links about massacres of innocent Vietnamese by the vietcong and north viet armies. Again, according to you, only the viets are entitled to do that but the Cambodians can't-- even when doing evil!

    China shouldn’t because there was no wrongdoing there, unlike Pol Pot. These “massacres†or “atrocitiesâ€, if indeed true, are small mistakes in comparison to what Ho Chi Minh has achieved for Vietnam.
    �
    The wrong-doings were Pol Pot's in Cambodia, and Ho's and his gang's when the same of things were done in nam. Why blame China for them?

    Both Pol Pot and Sihanouk lost their country, then decided to side with foreign powers to terrorize their own people.
    �
    The Pol Pot and Sihanouk combination saved their country by making Cambodia nam's OWN "Vietnam". The Sihanouk family are accepted and respected by the Cambodian people as their royal family-- something that the delusional viet choose to pretend otherwise.

    Ho would have been driven into the South China Sea had Mao not promised to intervene massively on his, and nam's, behalf if the murrikan armies dared to cross into north nam. Ho and his gang turned ungrateful back-stabbers afterwards. That is why the Chinese don't trust the viets anymore.

    Oh and the Sino-Soviet split is entirely based on Meo’s greed

    Despite the Soviet Union having granted all of the territory of the Japanese puppet state of Manchukuo to Mao’s communists in 1945, decisively assisting the communists in the Chinese Civil War, the Chinese now indirectly demanded territorial concessions on the basis that the 19th-century treaties transferring ownership of the sparsely populated Outer Manchuria, concluded by Qing dynasty China and the Russian Empire, were “Unequal Treatiesâ€, and amounted to annexation of rightful Chinese territory.
    �

    �
    "Granted", yes, "granted", a very revealing word-- about YOU that is! When I was in England, I often heard the Brits saying that "Britain GRANTED India independence"-- as if India did not deserve, or entitled to, independence on its OWN rights except when "granted" by the white Brits!!!

    Before his unfortunate early death, Lenin did offer to return to China territories grabbed by Tsarist Russia. THAT is the recognition that the territory was indeed extracted from China unfairly when the latter was weak and was facing aggressions by other imperialist powers from the sea. Therefore, Lenin must have considered that these territories indeed "amounted to annexation of rightful Chinese territory!!!

    The fact YOU unashamedly quoted this word "granted" tell me that you subconsciously harbour the "house-nigger" mentality and somehow believe that the non-whites can only be entitled to something that is "granted" by some whites. This "house-nigger" mentality may be an innate instinct of the viets, but it is NOT a Chinese one. You are indeed winning your well-deserved, and "delicious", position of being a house-nigger of the white Russians, and probably white murrikans too. It is so refreshing to know your inner thought!

    At the funeral of Ho Chi Minh

    At the same time, Nixon’s message via Maurer had reached the Chinese, and it was decided in Beijing to “whet the appetite of the Americans†by making China appear stronger.[36] Zhou argued that a war with the Soviet Union would weaken China’s hand vis-a-vis the United States.[36] The Chinese were more interested in the possibility of a rapprochement with the United States as a way of re-acquiring Taiwan than in having the United States as an ally against the Soviet Union.
    �
    How can anybody have respect for these traitors is beyond me, it’s beyond ridiculous.
    �
    If that is true, it means that the Chinese leaders were wedded to the interest of China and the Chinese people. Khrushchev had already made its own "rapprochement" with murrika-- behind China's back-- until he was "fucked" (your word) by Kennedy and then he lost power. And Brezhnev had asked murrika's permission for nuking China but was REFUSED.

    What makes you think that only the viets have the right to look after thier own security and interest but the Chinese don't have that right to defend themselves from the back-stabbing Russians and viets???!!! YOU are "beyond ridiculous"!

    Replies: @Smith

    Aw look at the mad chink, flailing around, accusing everyone to be “backstab†him, first the viets, now the ruskies, I wonder what’s next? The entire world for not bowing to them LOL?

    The house-niggers in America of old “always stay true†to their white masters. You make me laugh by saying the same about Ho and the viets.

    We stayed true to those allies who help us, respect us and do not invade us. The USSR is that, and remember chink, no USSR, no PRC. Mao was an opportunist who shakes hand with the devil to hurt his ally, the entire Sino-Soviet split was started by him wanting to be the biggest communist around, and the 3rd world friend spends his last days propping up terrorists in Cambodia, very funny.
    And no, Ho Chi Minh was no one’s puppet, his policy is Independence, no occupation from anyone, allies included.

    Then you are merely admitting you were saying crap with this “played both sides†comment earlier! Can you NOT bite your own tongue whenever you talk?

    How? He played both sides when he was in power in the 60s, but then he becomes a chinkie CIA puppet, those two facts aren’t mutually exclusive.

    It was “no puppet government and can perform its own politics†only AFTER “ex-Khmer rouge party members†went “back into the governmentâ€â€“ you said that yourself!!! Something that the viets hate to see. “its own politics†is for Cambodian interest and against viet political control. The Cambodians do that because “They have suffered enough already†in the hands of the viets land murrikans.

    Really now? They (Ex-Khmer Rouge) wanted to focus on Cambodian interests so much that they themselves terrorize and support those who bomb their own country? They are so sick by the viet and muricans that they are entirely funded by chinkies and muricans to be against viet? No, that’s not Cambodia’s interest, it is USA and China’s interest. Cambodia suffers the most during the reign of CIA and chink backed Pol Pot.

    SINCE “what the Cambodians do, it’s their businessâ€, then whatever Pol Pot did to other Cambodians must be Cambodian business! Therefore, it could NOT have been China’s fault. You contradict yourself yet again.

    It is entirely China’s fault because China chooses to invade Vietnam in defense of Pol Pot, who attacks and massacres Vietnam IN Vietnam’s territories.

    The fact that the Cambodians accept Sihanouk descendant as royal head proves his symbolic political importance to the Cambodians.

    You said it yourself, a symbolic figure, a puppet. So much for Cambodian liberation, all he does is being pushed around by greater powers and actual man-in-power like Hun Sen.

    Hun Sen is no longer a “viet-manâ€. He merely “played†the viets for his own ascendancy and the interests of his own country.

    Hun Sen is a Cambodian, not a “viet-manâ€, he can choose to pursuit whatever cause he wishes, as long as he doesn’t make the same mistake of Pol Pot and invade Vietnam.

    There should NEVER have been a “Viet government in Cambodia†AT ALL– unless it was a puppet of the viets!!! If you can accept a “Viet government in Cambodiaâ€, why can’t you accept a “murrikan government†in namâ€??? Show some consistency, please!

    The Viet government in Cambodia is created to safeguard the Cambodian people from CIA chinkies terrorists like Pol Pot, not to dominate and colonize natives like the murican government in Vietnam.

    Also, SINCE “what the Cambodians do, it’s their businessâ€, it therefore is up to the Cambodians to decide whether Cambodia should “allow liberal democracy and privatization†or not. It is NOT up to the viets to decide!!! What you have said merely betrays the viets’ imperialist intentions in Cambodia.

    Is it in their interests though? Did they vote for that or is entirely pressure from US or China? Liberal democracy and privatization are not policies that help the common folks, and Cambodian suffer to this day due to these policies.

    Who is your “They� Why does “they†are cham or not matter? A very weird statement.

    “They†are foreigners who aren’t even cham people? Why do they matter? If they care about cham people so much, they should visit Vietnam to see them.

    Not when they were being conquered and butchered by the viets.

    As opposed to? Again, they are living peacefully in Vietnam.

    China has similar claims too. The fact is that nam has grabbed the most islets in SCS and almost ALL of what it has grabbed lie in other people’s economic zones according to the UNCLOS. And those other countries are NOT taking any actions against vietnam’s occupation of these islets. So, who is the aggressor?

    LOL no, China’s claim is destroyed every times it’s brought up since it has NO historical artifacts or proof of colonization of these islands chains, and they are opposed by every maritime ASEAN countries because their nine-dash-line cuts deep into their EEZ, and actually enforced by a fleet of militia and fishermen that start trouble all over the region. Meanwhile, Vietnam’s holding of these islands are entirely a reaction to chink’s illegal island grab.

    Uncle Ho was also “whisked away†in China in his younger days. If I remember correctly, he actually became a member of the CCP. When it was his time to liberate his country from the French and the murrikans, China gave him ALL the “guns and weapons for freeâ€â€“ and MORE. So again, you seem to believe that the viets have UNLIMITED entitlements from whoever they want, but others canNOT even have one bit!!! Very strange, and ungrateful, mentality that is special to the viets!!!

    Uncle Ho was a member of MANY communist parties, even in Europe, he cooperated with the CCP and the CCCP and received aids from all the 2nd world bloc. He isn’t beholden to China. The chinks, meanwhile, only wanted him to hold the North because they wanted a way to appease the muricans, to repeat the North vs South Korea situation. Uncle Ho told them to fuck off. And no, chinkie imperialist like you, who think he’s “entitled†to vassal, can fuck right off.

    Like Ho and his gang was– See the links about massacres of innocent Vietnamese by the vietcong and north viet armies. Again, according to you, only the viets are entitled to do that but the Cambodians can’t– even when doing evil!

    These were mistakes in war or land reforms, which happen in every revolution ever, it cannot be compared to the likes of Pol Pot, who massacres his own people and other ethnics, got ousted, then got paid by CIA chinkies to become a bandit in Thailand’s border to kill more and rob more.

    The wrong-doings were Pol Pot’s in Cambodia, and Ho’s and his gang’s when the same of things were done in nam. Why blame China for them?

    The wrong-doings were not limited in Cambodia, Pol Pot invaded and massacred Vietnamese in Vietnam’s territory, and thus prompted the Viet invasion. Meanwhile, Vietnam has done nothing against China, but get immediately invaded because it dares stop Pol Pot. And when Vietnam comes to Cambodia to help stabilize things, muricans and chinkies team up to fund Pol Pot and Sihanouk for 10 years to rob, kill and sanctions both Cambodia and Vietnam. So yes, it is China’s fault, hell, it is China’s crimes.

    The Pol Pot and Sihanouk combination saved their country by making Cambodia nam’s OWN “Vietnamâ€. The Sihanouk family are accepted and respected by the Cambodian people as their royal family– something that the delusional viet choose to pretend otherwise.

    Nah, Pol Pot and Sihanouk combined to form banditry, with no government, no policy to help people, but just to steal and rob, with foreign funding, Vietnam didn’t encounter “Vietnam†in Cambodia, but CIA chinkies terrorists. Vietnam is forced back by the unjust massive sanctions by the whole world (China included), not these bandits. Sihanouk, meanwhile, goes back to be a little puppet, cared by Hun Sen LOL and Pol Pot lies death in the jungle like the bandit he is.

    Ho would have been driven into the South China Sea had Mao not promised to intervene massively on his, and nam’s, behalf if the murrikan armies dared to cross into north nam. Ho and his gang turned ungrateful back-stabbers afterwards. That is why the Chinese don’t trust the viets anymore.

    Mao can promise the sea, but it was the threat of USSR’s nukes that helps deter the americans. And I like the fact you think Uncle Ho is a “back-stabberâ€, while it’s you chinks who back-stab the USSR and Vietnam and the whole 2nd bloc by shaking hands with Great Satan.

    “Grantedâ€, yes, “grantedâ€, a very revealing word– about YOU that is! When I was in England…

    Oh, another “Asian amelicanâ€, as expected. And yes, granted, you read that right. Seethe more chink dog, that word is 100% accurate, the USSR granted these terriroties back to chinkies, they pity those dogs and of course, these dogs want more and more and more. They want their imperial territories back, not solidary or helping the world.

    Before his unfortunate early death, Lenin did offer to return to China territories grabbed by Tsarist Russia.

    Yeah, I’m sure he would offer them to the Kuomingtan, another bunch of capitalist imperialist.

    This “house-nigger†mentality may be an innate instinct of the viets, but it is NOT a Chinese one. You are indeed winning your well-deserved, and “deliciousâ€, position of being a house-nigger of the white Russians, and probably white murrikans too. It is so refreshing to know your inner thought!

    Truly “Asian amelicanâ€, their thinking is alien to actual asian, what we have is respect, trust and friendship to our allies. Meanwhile you chinks scream “house-nigger†while backstabbing the USSR, and every your allies to side with Great Satan and destabilize your own neighbors. You have the “treacherous dog’ mentality, and that’s why you will go down.

    If that is true, it means that the Chinese leaders were wedded to the interest of China and the Chinese people.

    If the interest of the Chinese people and China is to backstab, ruin alliance and shake hands with Great Satan to hurt their own allies and neighbors, the Chinese people and China do not deserve anything because they would be “treacherous dogsâ€.

    Khrushchev had already made its own “rapprochement†with murrika– behind China’s back– until he was “fucked†(your word) by Kennedy and then he lost power. And Brezhnev had asked murrika’s permission for nuking China but was REFUSED. What makes you think that only the viets have the right to look after thier own security and interest but the Chinese don’t have that right to defend themselves from the back-stabbing Russians and viets???!!! YOU are “beyond ridiculousâ€!

    Ah yes, great logic, Kruschev and Breznev “backstabbed†China by wanting to co-exist with the muricans but not wanting to side with muricans to attack China, so what’s Mao gonna do? Of course, team up with muricans and together with them fuck the USSR. Great logic of a treacherous, Cao Cao-like mentality. Now of course, anyone who is against this duplicity is an “Asian amelikanâ€, never mind the fact China being the best and most loyal “Asian amelikan†who now wishes to co-exist and have great friendship with their master whiteys.
    LOL, yes, beyond ridiculous. At first I feel angry, now I just feel pity for you, chink dog.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Deep Thought
    @Smith


    We stayed true to those allies who help us, respect us and do not invade us.
    �
    House-niggers ALWAYS "stayed true" to their white masters.

    Mao was an opportunist who shakes hand with the devil to hurt his ally,
    �
    Khrushchev was the opportunist who "shook hands" with Kennedy in order to hurt China and got "fucked" by Kennedy-- not China-- instead. Brezhnev wanted to nuke China with murrika's consent but got rebuffed.

    He played both sides when he was in power in the 60s, but then he becomes a chinkie CIA puppet, those two facts aren’t mutually exclusive.
    �
    If he indeed played both sides, then he was the puppet master, instead of the puppet.

    All the others are also recycled craps from you that I have already ridiculed.

    The ungrateful viets:

    Chinese Support for North Vietnam during the Vietnam War: The Decisive Edge
    by Bob Seals

    “Thus the highest realization of warfare is to attack the enemy plans;†according to the learned military theorist Sun-Tzu in the Art of War. [69] In respects this is exactly what the North Vietnamese, and Chinese did in both Vietnam Wars: they successfully attacked the Western powers war plans. The considerable support for the DRV by the PRC, to include a promise to intervene with massive numbers of troops in the event of an invasion of North Vietnam, effectively eliminated this course of action, and perhaps others, as potential war winning options for the West. Thus, with the support of China, on a strategic level of war the DRV was able to remain upon the offensive throughout the war, maintaining the initiative and finally achieving victory as Saigon fell in April of 1975.
    �
    .
    , @Deep Thought
    @Smith

    House-niggers staying true to their white masters:

    https://ccnmtl.columbia.edu/projects/mmt/mxp/speeches/mxt29.html

    Malcolm tells the parable of "house Negro."
    ...
    �
  • @Smith
    @Deep Thought

    You are losing this argument, and it's delicious, guess it's this one you won't save in a future copypasta.

    Of course, he played both sides. That is always the way the weak survives between the strongs. Uncle Ho played both sides too– the Chinese, the Russians. Through some OSS officer, he even tried to get murikans to support him against the French, I believe.
    �
    So you are asking question despite knowing the answers. And no, Ho Chi Minh has always stayed true to his ally and teacher, the USSR. Mao was an ally of the USSR but turns against it, and the whole 2nd world.

    IF Sihanouk “played both sidesâ€, then it means Sihanouk WAS the master who was playing both puppets– NOT being the puppet himself!!
    �
    Again, no, he was a puppet pushed around by Beijing and CIA, one day Beijing tells him to go lick Pol Pot’s ass, another day Beijing tells him to go the UN. His strings are high above.

    The Cambodian government, you admits in your previous post that it now “quietly opposes Vietnam on the South East Asia sea issueâ€. Whatever regime the viets built exist in name only.
    �
    That shows it is no puppet government and can perform its own politics, and no, what the Cambodians do, it’s their business. They have suffered enough already.

    That is not so according to the Cambodian people, who still regard his family as Cambodia’s Royal Family.
    �
    The Cambodian’s Royal head is entirely for show, the power lies in the government head by Hun Sen.

    If “ex-Khmer rouge party members†went “back into the governmentâ€. That proves that your claim about the durability of the regime the viets installed is just a uselss face saving exercise.
    �
    It’s true, the Viet government in Cambodia was damaged post 90s by the meddling of the UN, americans and China, that’s why it allows liberal democracy and privatization, but ruling party is still the same behind what we viets left behind. And the more it liberalizes, the worse it will get for the Cambodians.

    The viet did the same thing: “The case of the fallen Champa, by Suleiman Idres Binâ€. There is something common about the viet and Pol Pot.
    �
    I google that and look at what I found:
    https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/vietnamese-conquest-of-muslim-hindu-cham-and-their-current-situation.265898/
    Oh yes, more enraged foreigners about cham people, they are not even cham LOL and again btw, the cham people nowadays live freely in Vietnam.

    The Xishas was and is Chinese territory.
    �
    You mean Paracels/Hoang Sa, no, both island chains we have been colonized by the viets since the 15th century.
    And now, we don’t even want either of them, but just clear UNCLOS following the UN laws.

    China also had “diplomatic dialogues†with Sihanouk and the Khmer Rouge when that helps in liberating Cambodian territory.
    �
    China whisks away Sihanouk and then stores him in Pyongjang, and only summons him back as a face for CIA bandits to rally upon LOL even the Khmer rouge, his unlikely ally, hates his coward ass but uses his “royalty†as casus belli. And I didn't know "diplomatic dialogues" involves literally sending him guns and weapons for free.

    Sihanouk wanted to liberate Cambodia.
    �
    No, he doesn’t. He works directly with CIA and chinks in order to terrorize his own country near the Thailand’s border, working with Pol Pot. In fact, he’s the troublemaker.

    China never apologized for the vietcong and North viet army massacres either– BECAUSE China supported their fight against the murrikan invaders but NOT their massacres of the viet people.
    �
    China shouldn’t because there was no wrongdoing there, unlike Pol Pot. These “massacres†or “atrocitiesâ€, if indeed true, are small mistakes in comparison to what Ho Chi Minh has achieved for Vietnam.

    “Pol Pot and Sihanouk†BOTH had their own reasons to bite the viets and they used Chinese support to their own ends– Just like Uncle Ho did against the murrikans. By saying that, you are only admitting Ho and his gang are “criminals†like Pol Pot and Sihanouk .
    �
    Both Pol Pot and Sihanouk lost their country, then decided to side with foreign powers to terrorize their own people. Uncle Ho fought the japs, the frenchs, and later the americans for the sake of his people and he never allowed even (friendly) foreign troops to occupy Vietnam. He will always be remembered well by viets and the international world as a national hero and leader, unlike the likes of Pol Pot and Sihanouk, hell, or the likes of Meo and Dung LOL
    Oh and the Sino-Soviet split is entirely based on Meo’s greed

    Despite the Soviet Union having granted all of the territory of the Japanese puppet state of Manchukuo to Mao's communists in 1945, decisively assisting the communists in the Chinese Civil War, the Chinese now indirectly demanded territorial concessions on the basis that the 19th-century treaties transferring ownership of the sparsely populated Outer Manchuria, concluded by Qing dynasty China and the Russian Empire, were "Unequal Treaties", and amounted to annexation of rightful Chinese territory.
    �
    At the funeral of Ho Chi Minh

    At the same time, Nixon's message via Maurer had reached the Chinese, and it was decided in Beijing to "whet the appetite of the Americans" by making China appear stronger.[36] Zhou argued that a war with the Soviet Union would weaken China's hand vis-a-vis the United States.[36] The Chinese were more interested in the possibility of a rapprochement with the United States as a way of re-acquiring Taiwan than in having the United States as an ally against the Soviet Union.
    �
    How can anybody have respect for these traitors is beyond me, it’s beyond ridiculous.
    �
    �

    Replies: @Deep Thought

    So you are asking question despite knowing the answers. And no, Ho Chi Minh has always stayed true to his ally and teacher, the USSR. Mao was an ally of the USSR but turns against it, and the whole 2nd world.

    The house-niggers in America of old “always stay true” to their white masters. You make me laugh by saying the same about Ho and the viets.

    Mao was a leader of China and a friend of the 3rd world countries. He was his OWN master. Khrushchev and Brezhnev, who wanted Mao to be merely a bigger Ho and turned against China. They found out the hard way.

    On the other hand, it was Ho, and his gang, who back-stabbed Mao, and China, despite the crucial role the latter had played in helping the former to unite their country.

    [MORE]

    Again, no, he was a puppet pushed around by Beijing and CIA, one day Beijing tells him to go lick Pol Pot’s ass, another day Beijing tells him to go the UN. His strings are high above.

    Then you are merely admitting you were saying crap with this “played both sides” comment earlier! Can you NOT bite your own tongue whenever you talk?

    That shows it is no puppet government and can perform its own politics, and no, what the Cambodians do, it’s their business. They have suffered enough already.

    It was “no puppet government and can perform its own politics” only AFTER “ex-Khmer rouge party members†went “back into the government‖ you said that yourself!!! Something that the viets hate to see. “its own politics” is for Cambodian interest and against viet political control. The Cambodians do that because “They have suffered enough already” in the hands of the viets land murrikans.

    SINCE “what the Cambodians do, it’s their business”, then whatever Pol Pot did to other Cambodians must be Cambodian business! Therefore, it could NOT have been China’s fault. You contradict yourself yet again.

    The Cambodian’s Royal head is entirely for show, the power lies in the government head by Hun Sen.

    Aren’t “Royal heads” normally “for show”??? Does the British royal family have real political power, for example? Do you have what we call “commonsense”???

    The fact that the Cambodians accept Sihanouk descendant as royal head proves his symbolic political importance to the Cambodians.

    Hun Sen is no longer a “viet-man”. He merely “played” the viets for his own ascendancy and the interests of his own country.

    It’s true, the Viet government in Cambodia was damaged post 90s by the meddling of the UN, americans and China, that’s why it allows liberal democracy and privatization,…

    There should NEVER have been a “Viet government in Cambodia” AT ALL– unless it was a puppet of the viets!!! If you can accept a “Viet government in Cambodia”, why can’t you accept a “murrikan government” in nam”??? Show some consistency, please!

    Also, SINCE “what the Cambodians do, it’s their business”, it therefore is up to the Cambodians to decide whether Cambodia should “allow liberal democracy and privatization” or not. It is NOT up to the viets to decide!!! What you have said merely betrays the viets’ imperialist intentions in Cambodia.

    I google that and look at what I found:
    https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/vietnamese-conquest-of-muslim-hindu-cham-and-their-current-situation.265898/
    Oh yes, more enraged foreigners about cham people, they are not even cham LOL and

    Who is your “They”? Why does “they” are cham or not matter? A very weird statement.

    again btw, the cham people nowadays live freely in Vietnam.

    Not when they were being conquered and butchered by the viets.

    You mean Paracels/Hoang Sa, no, both island chains we have been colonized by the viets since the 15th century.
    And now, we don’t even want either of them, but just clear UNCLOS following the UN laws.

    China has similar claims too. The fact is that nam has grabbed the most islets in SCS and almost ALL of what it has grabbed lie in other people’s economic zones according to the UNCLOS. And those other countries are NOT taking any actions against vietnam’s occupation of these islets. So, who is the aggressor?

    China whisks away Sihanouk and then stores him in Pyongjang, and only summons him back as a face for CIA bandits to rally upon LOL even the Khmer rouge, his unlikely ally, hates his coward ass but uses his “royalty†as casus belli. And I didn’t know “diplomatic dialogues†involves literally sending him guns and weapons for free.

    Uncle Ho was also “whisked away” in China in his younger days. If I remember correctly, he actually became a member of the CCP. When it was his time to liberate his country from the French and the murrikans, China gave him ALL the “guns and weapons for free”– and MORE. So again, you seem to believe that the viets have UNLIMITED entitlements from whoever they want, but others canNOT even have one bit!!! Very strange, and ungrateful, mentality that is special to the viets!!!

    No, he doesn’t. He works directly with CIA and chinks in order to terrorize his own country near the Thailand’s border, working with Pol Pot. In fact, he’s the troublemaker.

    Like Ho and his gang was– See the links about massacres of innocent Vietnamese by the vietcong and north viet armies. Again, according to you, only the viets are entitled to do that but the Cambodians can’t– even when doing evil!

    China shouldn’t because there was no wrongdoing there, unlike Pol Pot. These “massacres†or “atrocitiesâ€, if indeed true, are small mistakes in comparison to what Ho Chi Minh has achieved for Vietnam.

    The wrong-doings were Pol Pot’s in Cambodia, and Ho’s and his gang’s when the same of things were done in nam. Why blame China for them?

    Both Pol Pot and Sihanouk lost their country, then decided to side with foreign powers to terrorize their own people.

    The Pol Pot and Sihanouk combination saved their country by making Cambodia nam’s OWN “Vietnam”. The Sihanouk family are accepted and respected by the Cambodian people as their royal family– something that the delusional viet choose to pretend otherwise.

    Ho would have been driven into the South China Sea had Mao not promised to intervene massively on his, and nam’s, behalf if the murrikan armies dared to cross into north nam. Ho and his gang turned ungrateful back-stabbers afterwards. That is why the Chinese don’t trust the viets anymore.

    Oh and the Sino-Soviet split is entirely based on Meo’s greed

    Despite the Soviet Union having granted all of the territory of the Japanese puppet state of Manchukuo to Mao’s communists in 1945, decisively assisting the communists in the Chinese Civil War, the Chinese now indirectly demanded territorial concessions on the basis that the 19th-century treaties transferring ownership of the sparsely populated Outer Manchuria, concluded by Qing dynasty China and the Russian Empire, were “Unequal Treatiesâ€, and amounted to annexation of rightful Chinese territory.

    “Granted”, yes, “granted”, a very revealing word– about YOU that is! When I was in England, I often heard the Brits saying that “Britain GRANTED India independence”– as if India did not deserve, or entitled to, independence on its OWN rights except when “granted” by the white Brits!!!

    Before his unfortunate early death, Lenin did offer to return to China territories grabbed by Tsarist Russia. THAT is the recognition that the territory was indeed extracted from China unfairly when the latter was weak and was facing aggressions by other imperialist powers from the sea. Therefore, Lenin must have considered that these territories indeed “amounted to annexation of rightful Chinese territory!!!

    The fact YOU unashamedly quoted this word “granted” tell me that you subconsciously harbour the “house-nigger” mentality and somehow believe that the non-whites can only be entitled to something that is “granted” by some whites. This “house-nigger” mentality may be an innate instinct of the viets, but it is NOT a Chinese one. You are indeed winning your well-deserved, and “delicious”, position of being a house-nigger of the white Russians, and probably white murrikans too. It is so refreshing to know your inner thought!

    At the funeral of Ho Chi Minh

    At the same time, Nixon’s message via Maurer had reached the Chinese, and it was decided in Beijing to “whet the appetite of the Americans†by making China appear stronger.[36] Zhou argued that a war with the Soviet Union would weaken China’s hand vis-a-vis the United States.[36] The Chinese were more interested in the possibility of a rapprochement with the United States as a way of re-acquiring Taiwan than in having the United States as an ally against the Soviet Union.

    How can anybody have respect for these traitors is beyond me, it’s beyond ridiculous.

    If that is true, it means that the Chinese leaders were wedded to the interest of China and the Chinese people. Khrushchev had already made its own “rapprochement” with murrika– behind China’s back– until he was “fucked” (your word) by Kennedy and then he lost power. And Brezhnev had asked murrika’s permission for nuking China but was REFUSED.

    What makes you think that only the viets have the right to look after thier own security and interest but the Chinese don’t have that right to defend themselves from the back-stabbing Russians and viets???!!! YOU are “beyond ridiculous”!

    •ï¿½Replies: @Smith
    @Deep Thought

    Aw look at the mad chink, flailing around, accusing everyone to be “backstab†him, first the viets, now the ruskies, I wonder what’s next? The entire world for not bowing to them LOL?

    The house-niggers in America of old “always stay true†to their white masters. You make me laugh by saying the same about Ho and the viets.
    �
    We stayed true to those allies who help us, respect us and do not invade us. The USSR is that, and remember chink, no USSR, no PRC. Mao was an opportunist who shakes hand with the devil to hurt his ally, the entire Sino-Soviet split was started by him wanting to be the biggest communist around, and the 3rd world friend spends his last days propping up terrorists in Cambodia, very funny.
    And no, Ho Chi Minh was no one’s puppet, his policy is Independence, no occupation from anyone, allies included.

    Then you are merely admitting you were saying crap with this “played both sides†comment earlier! Can you NOT bite your own tongue whenever you talk?
    �
    How? He played both sides when he was in power in the 60s, but then he becomes a chinkie CIA puppet, those two facts aren’t mutually exclusive.

    It was “no puppet government and can perform its own politics†only AFTER “ex-Khmer rouge party members†went “back into the governmentâ€â€“ you said that yourself!!! Something that the viets hate to see. “its own politics†is for Cambodian interest and against viet political control. The Cambodians do that because “They have suffered enough already†in the hands of the viets land murrikans.
    �
    Really now? They (Ex-Khmer Rouge) wanted to focus on Cambodian interests so much that they themselves terrorize and support those who bomb their own country? They are so sick by the viet and muricans that they are entirely funded by chinkies and muricans to be against viet? No, that’s not Cambodia’s interest, it is USA and China’s interest. Cambodia suffers the most during the reign of CIA and chink backed Pol Pot.

    SINCE “what the Cambodians do, it’s their businessâ€, then whatever Pol Pot did to other Cambodians must be Cambodian business! Therefore, it could NOT have been China’s fault. You contradict yourself yet again.
    �
    It is entirely China’s fault because China chooses to invade Vietnam in defense of Pol Pot, who attacks and massacres Vietnam IN Vietnam’s territories.

    The fact that the Cambodians accept Sihanouk descendant as royal head proves his symbolic political importance to the Cambodians.
    �
    You said it yourself, a symbolic figure, a puppet. So much for Cambodian liberation, all he does is being pushed around by greater powers and actual man-in-power like Hun Sen.

    Hun Sen is no longer a “viet-manâ€. He merely “played†the viets for his own ascendancy and the interests of his own country.
    �
    Hun Sen is a Cambodian, not a “viet-manâ€, he can choose to pursuit whatever cause he wishes, as long as he doesn’t make the same mistake of Pol Pot and invade Vietnam.

    There should NEVER have been a “Viet government in Cambodia†AT ALL– unless it was a puppet of the viets!!! If you can accept a “Viet government in Cambodiaâ€, why can’t you accept a “murrikan government†in namâ€??? Show some consistency, please!
    �
    The Viet government in Cambodia is created to safeguard the Cambodian people from CIA chinkies terrorists like Pol Pot, not to dominate and colonize natives like the murican government in Vietnam.

    Also, SINCE “what the Cambodians do, it’s their businessâ€, it therefore is up to the Cambodians to decide whether Cambodia should “allow liberal democracy and privatization†or not. It is NOT up to the viets to decide!!! What you have said merely betrays the viets’ imperialist intentions in Cambodia.
    �
    Is it in their interests though? Did they vote for that or is entirely pressure from US or China? Liberal democracy and privatization are not policies that help the common folks, and Cambodian suffer to this day due to these policies.

    Who is your “They� Why does “they†are cham or not matter? A very weird statement.
    �
    “They†are foreigners who aren’t even cham people? Why do they matter? If they care about cham people so much, they should visit Vietnam to see them.

    Not when they were being conquered and butchered by the viets.
    �
    As opposed to? Again, they are living peacefully in Vietnam.

    China has similar claims too. The fact is that nam has grabbed the most islets in SCS and almost ALL of what it has grabbed lie in other people’s economic zones according to the UNCLOS. And those other countries are NOT taking any actions against vietnam’s occupation of these islets. So, who is the aggressor?
    �
    LOL no, China’s claim is destroyed every times it’s brought up since it has NO historical artifacts or proof of colonization of these islands chains, and they are opposed by every maritime ASEAN countries because their nine-dash-line cuts deep into their EEZ, and actually enforced by a fleet of militia and fishermen that start trouble all over the region. Meanwhile, Vietnam’s holding of these islands are entirely a reaction to chink’s illegal island grab.

    Uncle Ho was also “whisked away†in China in his younger days. If I remember correctly, he actually became a member of the CCP. When it was his time to liberate his country from the French and the murrikans, China gave him ALL the “guns and weapons for freeâ€â€“ and MORE. So again, you seem to believe that the viets have UNLIMITED entitlements from whoever they want, but others canNOT even have one bit!!! Very strange, and ungrateful, mentality that is special to the viets!!!
    �
    Uncle Ho was a member of MANY communist parties, even in Europe, he cooperated with the CCP and the CCCP and received aids from all the 2nd world bloc. He isn’t beholden to China. The chinks, meanwhile, only wanted him to hold the North because they wanted a way to appease the muricans, to repeat the North vs South Korea situation. Uncle Ho told them to fuck off. And no, chinkie imperialist like you, who think he’s “entitled†to vassal, can fuck right off.

    Like Ho and his gang was– See the links about massacres of innocent Vietnamese by the vietcong and north viet armies. Again, according to you, only the viets are entitled to do that but the Cambodians can’t– even when doing evil!
    �
    These were mistakes in war or land reforms, which happen in every revolution ever, it cannot be compared to the likes of Pol Pot, who massacres his own people and other ethnics, got ousted, then got paid by CIA chinkies to become a bandit in Thailand’s border to kill more and rob more.

    The wrong-doings were Pol Pot’s in Cambodia, and Ho’s and his gang’s when the same of things were done in nam. Why blame China for them?
    �
    The wrong-doings were not limited in Cambodia, Pol Pot invaded and massacred Vietnamese in Vietnam’s territory, and thus prompted the Viet invasion. Meanwhile, Vietnam has done nothing against China, but get immediately invaded because it dares stop Pol Pot. And when Vietnam comes to Cambodia to help stabilize things, muricans and chinkies team up to fund Pol Pot and Sihanouk for 10 years to rob, kill and sanctions both Cambodia and Vietnam. So yes, it is China’s fault, hell, it is China’s crimes.

    The Pol Pot and Sihanouk combination saved their country by making Cambodia nam’s OWN “Vietnamâ€. The Sihanouk family are accepted and respected by the Cambodian people as their royal family– something that the delusional viet choose to pretend otherwise.
    �
    Nah, Pol Pot and Sihanouk combined to form banditry, with no government, no policy to help people, but just to steal and rob, with foreign funding, Vietnam didn’t encounter “Vietnam†in Cambodia, but CIA chinkies terrorists. Vietnam is forced back by the unjust massive sanctions by the whole world (China included), not these bandits. Sihanouk, meanwhile, goes back to be a little puppet, cared by Hun Sen LOL and Pol Pot lies death in the jungle like the bandit he is.

    Ho would have been driven into the South China Sea had Mao not promised to intervene massively on his, and nam’s, behalf if the murrikan armies dared to cross into north nam. Ho and his gang turned ungrateful back-stabbers afterwards. That is why the Chinese don’t trust the viets anymore.
    �
    Mao can promise the sea, but it was the threat of USSR’s nukes that helps deter the americans. And I like the fact you think Uncle Ho is a “back-stabberâ€, while it’s you chinks who back-stab the USSR and Vietnam and the whole 2nd bloc by shaking hands with Great Satan.

    “Grantedâ€, yes, “grantedâ€, a very revealing word– about YOU that is! When I was in England…
    �
    Oh, another “Asian amelicanâ€, as expected. And yes, granted, you read that right. Seethe more chink dog, that word is 100% accurate, the USSR granted these terriroties back to chinkies, they pity those dogs and of course, these dogs want more and more and more. They want their imperial territories back, not solidary or helping the world.

    Before his unfortunate early death, Lenin did offer to return to China territories grabbed by Tsarist Russia.
    �
    Yeah, I’m sure he would offer them to the Kuomingtan, another bunch of capitalist imperialist.

    This “house-nigger†mentality may be an innate instinct of the viets, but it is NOT a Chinese one. You are indeed winning your well-deserved, and “deliciousâ€, position of being a house-nigger of the white Russians, and probably white murrikans too. It is so refreshing to know your inner thought!
    �
    Truly “Asian amelicanâ€, their thinking is alien to actual asian, what we have is respect, trust and friendship to our allies. Meanwhile you chinks scream “house-nigger†while backstabbing the USSR, and every your allies to side with Great Satan and destabilize your own neighbors. You have the “treacherous dog’ mentality, and that’s why you will go down.

    If that is true, it means that the Chinese leaders were wedded to the interest of China and the Chinese people.
    �
    If the interest of the Chinese people and China is to backstab, ruin alliance and shake hands with Great Satan to hurt their own allies and neighbors, the Chinese people and China do not deserve anything because they would be “treacherous dogsâ€.

    Khrushchev had already made its own “rapprochement†with murrika– behind China’s back– until he was “fucked†(your word) by Kennedy and then he lost power. And Brezhnev had asked murrika’s permission for nuking China but was REFUSED. What makes you think that only the viets have the right to look after thier own security and interest but the Chinese don’t have that right to defend themselves from the back-stabbing Russians and viets???!!! YOU are “beyond ridiculousâ€!
    �
    Ah yes, great logic, Kruschev and Breznev “backstabbed†China by wanting to co-exist with the muricans but not wanting to side with muricans to attack China, so what’s Mao gonna do? Of course, team up with muricans and together with them fuck the USSR. Great logic of a treacherous, Cao Cao-like mentality. Now of course, anyone who is against this duplicity is an “Asian amelikanâ€, never mind the fact China being the best and most loyal “Asian amelikan†who now wishes to co-exist and have great friendship with their master whiteys.
    LOL, yes, beyond ridiculous. At first I feel angry, now I just feel pity for you, chink dog.

    Replies: @Deep Thought, @Deep Thought
  • @Sinotibetan
    @Lot

    Very interesting. As a person of Chinese descent, I have often wondered why Europeans /people of European descent were/are more innovative(than Asians, even other non European ethnic groups) , especially in mathematics, the basic sciences and technological inventions. I don't think the majority of whites are innovative, but those who do really excell. A civilization just needs a significant minority of excellent innovators to have the edge over others. Why is it that a civilization much older than Western countries stagnated in science, maths and technology for millennia.
    I think there are certain traits needed to be innovative....apart from excellent memory:intuitive and deductive abilities, a healthy dose of curiosity, idealistic personality, adventurous and daring spirit(to think of new ideas) and wanting to be original, unique and different. Never mind if the idea may not seem to have 'practical value' initially.
    This spirit of innovation is what I admire in whites /Europeans sorely lacking in my country, and perhaps that could be extrapolated to China (or Korea or Japan) as well. I had friends who had 'photographic memory'(the Chinese are good at this, a friend who spoke and wrote broken English could write, from memory, whole paragraphs or oven chapters from a book on human anatomy) and always scored top marks in exams - they know the 'game of exams'. They can do a job or take a course, not because they have any liking for the job or subject, but just because they can have higher incomes. They are pragmatic people - knowledge or any idea is just a means to get rich or attain higher status in society. If a certain knowledge or idea is deemed to have no (known) practical value, none would be interested. And Asian parents also instill in their children such attitude. At least, that's how I remembered my childhood - how my parents tried to 'break' my idealistic streak since I liked to think of new ideas in chemistry or maths, or tried to compose baroque style music etc.. They ultimately partially succeeded in killing off all the Idealism . I think there is something cultural to this conformist trait.
    Another reason why I think China will not be a superpower or significant innovator nation - unless there is a change in this type of mentality that I mentioned.

    Replies: @Daniel Chieh, @dogbumbreath

    Very interesting. As a person of Chinese descent, I have often wondered why Europeans /people of European descent were/are more innovative(than Asians, even other non European ethnic groups)…

    Current Chinese and Asians in general DO NOT explore and travel. You will find Japanese and South Koreans off the beaten path but it is rare. Asians visiting Paris, Venice, London or New York is not “travelling”. Americans in general are also guilty of NOT exploring or travelling. Visiting the Grand Canyon and Las Vegas do NOT count. If you have travelled the corners of the World, off the beaten path, you will find Western Europeans, Australians and Canadians most often. Miriam Beard says, “Travel is more than the seeing of sights; it is a change that goes on, deep and permanent, in the ideas of living”. I believe this is the core of creativity and explains why the Early Europeans were so successful post 1600’s.

  • @AltanBakshi
    @Blinky Bill

    What the hell? Like emperor Qianglongs China was weaker economically, politically or militarilly than UK and the Dutch? Humbug! Utter nonsense! Only after the industrialization really began in the early 19th centuy, did the UK grow stronger.

    Replies: @Lake Wobegon

    This is a chart created by Ray Dalio in his research. It accounts for multiple dimensions like science and trade. Some of these areas arguably were weaker for China at that time. Instead of arguing over small areas of discrepancies, it is useful to observe the arc of where things have been and where they are headed. Unless miracle happens, China and the U.S. will soon switch places. From where I stand, there is just nothing that could change this dynamic. We will be number two. It is just a matter of time.

  • Smith says:
    @Deep Thought

    Sihanouk played both sides when he was head of state in the 60s, and yes , he “allowed†it.
    �
    Of course, he played both sides. That is always the way the weak survives between the strongs. Uncle Ho played both sides too-- the Chinese, the Russians. Through some OSS officer, he even tried to get murikans to support him against the French, I believe. But, to the whites, skin colour is thicker than ideals. So, Ho had to rely on the Chinese instead.

    Sihanouk was pretty much a puppet pushed around, first by the US, and then China.
    �
    IF Sihanouk "played both sides", then it means Sihanouk WAS the master who was playing both puppets-- NOT being the puppet himself!!! Can you, at least, TRY not contradicting yourself?

    If Pol Pot hated “both†so much, why does he become a CIA bandit and enjoys full western and chink support to kill and destabilize his own people?
    �
    Maybe, Pol Pot too tried to become a puppet master? He turned out to be not so successful as Sihanouk-- probably due to the fact that he "kill and destabilize his own people".

    That “regime†is still existing today, with a name change and market liberalization, the ruling party is the Cambodian People Party i.e. Hun Sen’s party that was built by Viets post-Pol Pot.
    �
    The Cambodian government, you admits in your previous post that it now "quietly opposes Vietnam on the South East Asia sea issue". Whatever regime the viets built exist in name only.

    Today's North Korea is still the same North Korea-- it is even ruled by the same Kim family.

    No, Sihanouk lost every legitimacy when he supported Pol Pot/Khmer Rouge by China and US’s advice, he essentially becomes just another puppet like Puyi or Ming Mang, used by foreign powers to destabilize home country.
    �
    That is not so according to the Cambodian people, who still regard his family as Cambodia's Royal Family.

    See above why Sihanouk was not a puppet. And see above how you bite your own tongue every time you talk!!!

    The same way the US does to any of its enemy, massive amount of propaganda. Cambodia and Vietnam states still enjoy nice relationship, but because post-Vietnam withdrawal, there was surge of US-backed and chink-based ex-Khmer rouge party members back into the government.
    �
    If "ex-Khmer rouge party members" went "back into the government". That proves that your claim about the durability of the regime the viets installed is just a uselss face saving exercise.

    And no, Cambodia does not see an example in Champa, hell, Pol Pot massacres cham people under his reign.
    �
    The viet did the same thing: "The case of the fallen Champa, by Suleiman Idres Bin". There is something common about the viet and Pol Pot.

    No, Vietnam militarization of the islets are a reaction against China’s illegal grab of Paracel and the nine-dash-claim. Vietnam has no dispute with other countries, and ASEAN as a whole is united against chink aggression this year.
    https://asiatimes.com/2020/07/asean-stops-pulling-punches-over-south-china-sea/
    �
    The Xishas was and is Chinese territory.

    http://chasfreeman.net/diplomacy-on-the-rocks-china-and-other-claimants-in-the-south-china-sea/

    The south viets once tried to illegally grab them but was beaten off.

    Take a long at the map I linked to earlier. The sea within the viet dash-line is almost as big as China's. That means that on a per capita, or per unit land area, basis, the viet claim is many times bigger than China's.

    Funny how chinks cooperate with CIA for over 10 years to fuck over Vietnam and Cambodia, and now they cry foul when another country has diplomatic relation with their rival.
    �
    China also had "diplomatic dialogues" with Sihanouk and the Khmer Rouge when that helps in liberating Cambodian territory. What makes you think that only the viets can play this game?

    Uncle Ho only wanted to liberate Vietnam,
    �
    Sihanouk wanted to liberate Cambodia.

    "Mao and Deng shook hands with Nixon and Kissinger" because the USSR was putting huge military pressure on China-- at one stage even consider nuclear strikes against China. Why should China ignore its own security just to please some ungrateful viets?

    Lies. There’s active historical revisionism going around right now, and China refuses to apologize for supporting Pol Pot despite ADMITTING his wrongdoings.
    �
    China never apologized for the vietcong and North viet army massacres either-- BECAUSE China supported their fight against the murrikan invaders but NOT their massacres of the viet people. The north viet army and the vietcongs had to take their own responsibility for these actions, which China could not control BUT Uncle Ho and his gang could!!!

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massacre_at_Hu%E1%BA%BF

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-hidden-atrocities-of-the-vietnam-war-1538664997

    Again wrong, Pol Pot and Sihanouk were both used to bite Vietnam and prop up banditry, and in the end, they both failed. The government that rules Cambodia now is the government Vietnam establishes,..
    �
    "Pol Pot and Sihanouk" BOTH had their own reasons to bite the viets and they used Chinese support to their own ends-- Just like Uncle Ho did against the murrikans. By saying that, you are only admitting Ho and his gang are "criminals" like Pol Pot and Sihanouk .

    Replies: @Smith

    You are losing this argument, and it’s delicious, guess it’s this one you won’t save in a future copypasta.

    Of course, he played both sides. That is always the way the weak survives between the strongs. Uncle Ho played both sides too– the Chinese, the Russians. Through some OSS officer, he even tried to get murikans to support him against the French, I believe.

    So you are asking question despite knowing the answers. And no, Ho Chi Minh has always stayed true to his ally and teacher, the USSR. Mao was an ally of the USSR but turns against it, and the whole 2nd world.

    IF Sihanouk “played both sidesâ€, then it means Sihanouk WAS the master who was playing both puppets– NOT being the puppet himself!!

    Again, no, he was a puppet pushed around by Beijing and CIA, one day Beijing tells him to go lick Pol Pot’s ass, another day Beijing tells him to go the UN. His strings are high above.

    The Cambodian government, you admits in your previous post that it now “quietly opposes Vietnam on the South East Asia sea issueâ€. Whatever regime the viets built exist in name only.

    That shows it is no puppet government and can perform its own politics, and no, what the Cambodians do, it’s their business. They have suffered enough already.

    That is not so according to the Cambodian people, who still regard his family as Cambodia’s Royal Family.

    The Cambodian’s Royal head is entirely for show, the power lies in the government head by Hun Sen.

    If “ex-Khmer rouge party members†went “back into the governmentâ€. That proves that your claim about the durability of the regime the viets installed is just a uselss face saving exercise.

    It’s true, the Viet government in Cambodia was damaged post 90s by the meddling of the UN, americans and China, that’s why it allows liberal democracy and privatization, but ruling party is still the same behind what we viets left behind. And the more it liberalizes, the worse it will get for the Cambodians.

    The viet did the same thing: “The case of the fallen Champa, by Suleiman Idres Binâ€. There is something common about the viet and Pol Pot.

    I google that and look at what I found:
    https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/vietnamese-conquest-of-muslim-hindu-cham-and-their-current-situation.265898/
    Oh yes, more enraged foreigners about cham people, they are not even cham LOL and again btw, the cham people nowadays live freely in Vietnam.

    The Xishas was and is Chinese territory.

    You mean Paracels/Hoang Sa, no, both island chains we have been colonized by the viets since the 15th century.
    And now, we don’t even want either of them, but just clear UNCLOS following the UN laws.

    China also had “diplomatic dialogues†with Sihanouk and the Khmer Rouge when that helps in liberating Cambodian territory.

    China whisks away Sihanouk and then stores him in Pyongjang, and only summons him back as a face for CIA bandits to rally upon LOL even the Khmer rouge, his unlikely ally, hates his coward ass but uses his “royalty†as casus belli. And I didn’t know “diplomatic dialogues” involves literally sending him guns and weapons for free.

    Sihanouk wanted to liberate Cambodia.

    No, he doesn’t. He works directly with CIA and chinks in order to terrorize his own country near the Thailand’s border, working with Pol Pot. In fact, he’s the troublemaker.

    China never apologized for the vietcong and North viet army massacres either– BECAUSE China supported their fight against the murrikan invaders but NOT their massacres of the viet people.

    China shouldn’t because there was no wrongdoing there, unlike Pol Pot. These “massacres†or “atrocitiesâ€, if indeed true, are small mistakes in comparison to what Ho Chi Minh has achieved for Vietnam.

    “Pol Pot and Sihanouk†BOTH had their own reasons to bite the viets and they used Chinese support to their own ends– Just like Uncle Ho did against the murrikans. By saying that, you are only admitting Ho and his gang are “criminals†like Pol Pot and Sihanouk .

    Both Pol Pot and Sihanouk lost their country, then decided to side with foreign powers to terrorize their own people. Uncle Ho fought the japs, the frenchs, and later the americans for the sake of his people and he never allowed even (friendly) foreign troops to occupy Vietnam. He will always be remembered well by viets and the international world as a national hero and leader, unlike the likes of Pol Pot and Sihanouk, hell, or the likes of Meo and Dung LOL
    Oh and the Sino-Soviet split is entirely based on Meo’s greed

    Despite the Soviet Union having granted all of the territory of the Japanese puppet state of Manchukuo to Mao’s communists in 1945, decisively assisting the communists in the Chinese Civil War, the Chinese now indirectly demanded territorial concessions on the basis that the 19th-century treaties transferring ownership of the sparsely populated Outer Manchuria, concluded by Qing dynasty China and the Russian Empire, were “Unequal Treaties”, and amounted to annexation of rightful Chinese territory.

    At the funeral of Ho Chi Minh

    At the same time, Nixon’s message via Maurer had reached the Chinese, and it was decided in Beijing to “whet the appetite of the Americans” by making China appear stronger.[36] Zhou argued that a war with the Soviet Union would weaken China’s hand vis-a-vis the United States.[36] The Chinese were more interested in the possibility of a rapprochement with the United States as a way of re-acquiring Taiwan than in having the United States as an ally against the Soviet Union.

    How can anybody have respect for these traitors is beyond me, it’s beyond ridiculous.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Deep Thought
    @Smith


    So you are asking question despite knowing the answers. And no, Ho Chi Minh has always stayed true to his ally and teacher, the USSR. Mao was an ally of the USSR but turns against it, and the whole 2nd world.
    �
    The house-niggers in America of old "always stay true" to their white masters. You make me laugh by saying the same about Ho and the viets.

    Mao was a leader of China and a friend of the 3rd world countries. He was his OWN master. Khrushchev and Brezhnev, who wanted Mao to be merely a bigger Ho and turned against China. They found out the hard way.

    On the other hand, it was Ho, and his gang, who back-stabbed Mao, and China, despite the crucial role the latter had played in helping the former to unite their country.

    Again, no, he was a puppet pushed around by Beijing and CIA, one day Beijing tells him to go lick Pol Pot’s ass, another day Beijing tells him to go the UN. His strings are high above.
    �
    Then you are merely admitting you were saying crap with this "played both sides" comment earlier! Can you NOT bite your own tongue whenever you talk?

    That shows it is no puppet government and can perform its own politics, and no, what the Cambodians do, it’s their business. They have suffered enough already.
    �
    It was "no puppet government and can perform its own politics" only AFTER “ex-Khmer rouge party members†went “back into the governmentâ€-- you said that yourself!!! Something that the viets hate to see. "its own politics" is for Cambodian interest and against viet political control. The Cambodians do that because "They have suffered enough already" in the hands of the viets land murrikans.

    SINCE "what the Cambodians do, it’s their business", then whatever Pol Pot did to other Cambodians must be Cambodian business! Therefore, it could NOT have been China's fault. You contradict yourself yet again.

    The Cambodian’s Royal head is entirely for show, the power lies in the government head by Hun Sen.
    �
    Aren't "Royal heads" normally "for show"??? Does the British royal family have real political power, for example? Do you have what we call "commonsense"???

    The fact that the Cambodians accept Sihanouk descendant as royal head proves his symbolic political importance to the Cambodians.

    Hun Sen is no longer a "viet-man". He merely "played" the viets for his own ascendancy and the interests of his own country.

    It’s true, the Viet government in Cambodia was damaged post 90s by the meddling of the UN, americans and China, that’s why it allows liberal democracy and privatization,...
    �
    There should NEVER have been a "Viet government in Cambodia" AT ALL-- unless it was a puppet of the viets!!! If you can accept a "Viet government in Cambodia", why can't you accept a "murrikan government" in nam"??? Show some consistency, please!

    Also, SINCE "what the Cambodians do, it’s their business", it therefore is up to the Cambodians to decide whether Cambodia should "allow liberal democracy and privatization" or not. It is NOT up to the viets to decide!!! What you have said merely betrays the viets' imperialist intentions in Cambodia.

    I google that and look at what I found:
    https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/vietnamese-conquest-of-muslim-hindu-cham-and-their-current-situation.265898/
    Oh yes, more enraged foreigners about cham people, they are not even cham LOL and
    �
    Who is your "They"? Why does "they" are cham or not matter? A very weird statement.

    again btw, the cham people nowadays live freely in Vietnam.
    �
    Not when they were being conquered and butchered by the viets.

    You mean Paracels/Hoang Sa, no, both island chains we have been colonized by the viets since the 15th century.
    And now, we don’t even want either of them, but just clear UNCLOS following the UN laws.
    �
    China has similar claims too. The fact is that nam has grabbed the most islets in SCS and almost ALL of what it has grabbed lie in other people's economic zones according to the UNCLOS. And those other countries are NOT taking any actions against vietnam's occupation of these islets. So, who is the aggressor?

    China whisks away Sihanouk and then stores him in Pyongjang, and only summons him back as a face for CIA bandits to rally upon LOL even the Khmer rouge, his unlikely ally, hates his coward ass but uses his “royalty†as casus belli. And I didn’t know “diplomatic dialogues†involves literally sending him guns and weapons for free.
    �
    Uncle Ho was also "whisked away" in China in his younger days. If I remember correctly, he actually became a member of the CCP. When it was his time to liberate his country from the French and the murrikans, China gave him ALL the "guns and weapons for free"-- and MORE. So again, you seem to believe that the viets have UNLIMITED entitlements from whoever they want, but others canNOT even have one bit!!! Very strange, and ungrateful, mentality that is special to the viets!!!

    No, he doesn’t. He works directly with CIA and chinks in order to terrorize his own country near the Thailand’s border, working with Pol Pot. In fact, he’s the troublemaker.
    �
    Like Ho and his gang was-- See the links about massacres of innocent Vietnamese by the vietcong and north viet armies. Again, according to you, only the viets are entitled to do that but the Cambodians can't-- even when doing evil!

    China shouldn’t because there was no wrongdoing there, unlike Pol Pot. These “massacres†or “atrocitiesâ€, if indeed true, are small mistakes in comparison to what Ho Chi Minh has achieved for Vietnam.
    �
    The wrong-doings were Pol Pot's in Cambodia, and Ho's and his gang's when the same of things were done in nam. Why blame China for them?

    Both Pol Pot and Sihanouk lost their country, then decided to side with foreign powers to terrorize their own people.
    �
    The Pol Pot and Sihanouk combination saved their country by making Cambodia nam's OWN "Vietnam". The Sihanouk family are accepted and respected by the Cambodian people as their royal family-- something that the delusional viet choose to pretend otherwise.

    Ho would have been driven into the South China Sea had Mao not promised to intervene massively on his, and nam's, behalf if the murrikan armies dared to cross into north nam. Ho and his gang turned ungrateful back-stabbers afterwards. That is why the Chinese don't trust the viets anymore.

    Oh and the Sino-Soviet split is entirely based on Meo’s greed

    Despite the Soviet Union having granted all of the territory of the Japanese puppet state of Manchukuo to Mao’s communists in 1945, decisively assisting the communists in the Chinese Civil War, the Chinese now indirectly demanded territorial concessions on the basis that the 19th-century treaties transferring ownership of the sparsely populated Outer Manchuria, concluded by Qing dynasty China and the Russian Empire, were “Unequal Treatiesâ€, and amounted to annexation of rightful Chinese territory.
    �

    �
    "Granted", yes, "granted", a very revealing word-- about YOU that is! When I was in England, I often heard the Brits saying that "Britain GRANTED India independence"-- as if India did not deserve, or entitled to, independence on its OWN rights except when "granted" by the white Brits!!!

    Before his unfortunate early death, Lenin did offer to return to China territories grabbed by Tsarist Russia. THAT is the recognition that the territory was indeed extracted from China unfairly when the latter was weak and was facing aggressions by other imperialist powers from the sea. Therefore, Lenin must have considered that these territories indeed "amounted to annexation of rightful Chinese territory!!!

    The fact YOU unashamedly quoted this word "granted" tell me that you subconsciously harbour the "house-nigger" mentality and somehow believe that the non-whites can only be entitled to something that is "granted" by some whites. This "house-nigger" mentality may be an innate instinct of the viets, but it is NOT a Chinese one. You are indeed winning your well-deserved, and "delicious", position of being a house-nigger of the white Russians, and probably white murrikans too. It is so refreshing to know your inner thought!

    At the funeral of Ho Chi Minh

    At the same time, Nixon’s message via Maurer had reached the Chinese, and it was decided in Beijing to “whet the appetite of the Americans†by making China appear stronger.[36] Zhou argued that a war with the Soviet Union would weaken China’s hand vis-a-vis the United States.[36] The Chinese were more interested in the possibility of a rapprochement with the United States as a way of re-acquiring Taiwan than in having the United States as an ally against the Soviet Union.
    �
    How can anybody have respect for these traitors is beyond me, it’s beyond ridiculous.
    �
    If that is true, it means that the Chinese leaders were wedded to the interest of China and the Chinese people. Khrushchev had already made its own "rapprochement" with murrika-- behind China's back-- until he was "fucked" (your word) by Kennedy and then he lost power. And Brezhnev had asked murrika's permission for nuking China but was REFUSED.

    What makes you think that only the viets have the right to look after thier own security and interest but the Chinese don't have that right to defend themselves from the back-stabbing Russians and viets???!!! YOU are "beyond ridiculous"!

    Replies: @Smith
  • @Blinky Bill
    https://www.principles.com/assets/graph-rough-estimates-relative-standing-2-30ffad3bf9fb209a05539593f8a570071451dc5f33c175663ca904f795474403.png

    Replies: @AltanBakshi

    What the hell? Like emperor Qianglongs China was weaker economically, politically or militarilly than UK and the Dutch? Humbug! Utter nonsense! Only after the industrialization really began in the early 19th centuy, did the UK grow stronger.

    •ï¿½Agree: Showmethereal
    •ï¿½Replies: @Lake Wobegon
    @AltanBakshi

    This is a chart created by Ray Dalio in his research. It accounts for multiple dimensions like science and trade. Some of these areas arguably were weaker for China at that time. Instead of arguing over small areas of discrepancies, it is useful to observe the arc of where things have been and where they are headed. Unless miracle happens, China and the U.S. will soon switch places. From where I stand, there is just nothing that could change this dynamic. We will be number two. It is just a matter of time.
  • @Deep Thought
    @showmethereal


    ‘China wants to lead, rather simply join’: top Australian diplomat takes aim at Beijing’s foreign policy

    Frances Adamson has accused Beijing of setting its own agenda internationally rather than working collaboratively with other countries

    She says the main challenge for Australia is helping to shape a new global order without the influence of an inwardly focused US

    https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/3111354/china-wants-lead-rather-simply-join-top-australian-diplomat
    �
    How dare these Chinese actually WANT to lead???!!! That is an unbearable affront to the Whites' dignity.

    Don't they know that only the Whites are entitled to lead in this world? Now, "without the influence of an inwardly focused US", "America's deputy sheriff in Asia" must "shape a new global order"-- that actually follows an OLD formula of domination by the White race-- in which a dark, inconspicuous, PLACE in a corner will be reserved to put these over-ambitious Chinese in.

    Replies: @showmethereal, @Deep Thought

    When “America’s Deputy Sherriff in Asia” “wants to lead”:

    Atrocities included the murder of two 14-year-old boys, who had their throats slit by Australian troops and subsequently had their bodies bagged up and dumped in a river.

    The academic Randa Abdel Fattah wrote that the behaviour of the Australian soldiers was not the work of ‘bad apples’, and could not be extricated from the wider issues of white supremacy and western militarism.

    “Anybody half conscious since 2001 will have witnessed the political & media dehumanisation of Afghans as enemies, terrorists, disposable. Where’s the surprise in all this? THIS is who White Australia is. Not an aberration, but war crimes two decades in the training.†Abdel Fattah wrote.

    https://www.trtworld.com/magazine/slitting-the-throats-of-boys-anger-as-report-details-australia-war-crimes-41616

    Video Link

    And Morrison blames China for telling the truth:

    https://asiatimes.com/2020/11/chinese-officials-tweet-repugnant-australian-pm/

  • @Astuteobservor II
    @Brian Damage

    I am sorry, but anyone who espouses soft power over hard power would be really brain damaged.

    The American military budget should slap you silly.

    The Chinese around 1900 would probably kill you on sight for saying something so stupid.

    The America today would not exist.

    Saddam is crawling out of his grave to strangle you with the rope that hanged him.

    Soft power comes naturally with hard power. With money. With status.

    Telling the chinese to forsake hard power to pursue soft power is the same as telling them to commit suicide.

    Replies: @Brian Damage

    “I am sorry, but anyone who espouses soft power over hard power would be really brain damaged.

    The American military budget should slap you silly.

    The Chinese around 1900 would probably kill you on sight for saying something so stupid.

    The America today would not exist.

    Saddam is crawling out of his grave to strangle you with the rope that hanged him.

    Soft power comes naturally with hard power. With money. With status.

    Telling the chinese to forsake hard power to pursue soft power is the same as telling them to commit suicide.”

    Who said “to forsake hard power to pursue soft power”? What is this? A Zero sum game between Hard and Soft power? Stiff engineer thinking perhaps. Hard power is necessary but soft power will smooth the process. Soft power do not come from Hard Power. “Soft power comes naturally with hard power. With money. With status.” as you said, exposed your ignorance of Soft Power. Many people with no money have more soft power than the rich folks. Maybe you think Soft Power is to buy people’s favor. That’s not soft power. That’s bribery. The money stops, the fawning stops. Soft power comes from free-will. The US is very powerful but how about soft power? Not much from the hardliners but a lot of soft power from the progressive side. Why? Because people can identify with it.

    Italy and Japan definitely does not have the hard power and they multiplied their powers tenfold because of their soft power. As messed up as both countries in many areas.

    You know why people can still get away with accusing China of organ harvesting, being dirty, poor, disease spreader, concentration camps, human rights violations? When it is so easy to dispel these. With nerdy engineers at the helm, they will respond like as though they are building a bridge. Will not work. Like I said before, it is like a math nerd with no social skills trying to teach others now to get girls. Probably methodically, theoretical but lack any practical results in real life.

  • Sihanouk played both sides when he was head of state in the 60s, and yes , he “allowed†it.

    Of course, he played both sides. That is always the way the weak survives between the strongs. Uncle Ho played both sides too– the Chinese, the Russians. Through some OSS officer, he even tried to get murikans to support him against the French, I believe. But, to the whites, skin colour is thicker than ideals. So, Ho had to rely on the Chinese instead.

    Sihanouk was pretty much a puppet pushed around, first by the US, and then China.

    IF Sihanouk “played both sides”, then it means Sihanouk WAS the master who was playing both puppets– NOT being the puppet himself!!! Can you, at least, TRY not contradicting yourself?

    If Pol Pot hated “both†so much, why does he become a CIA bandit and enjoys full western and chink support to kill and destabilize his own people?

    Maybe, Pol Pot too tried to become a puppet master? He turned out to be not so successful as Sihanouk– probably due to the fact that he “kill and destabilize his own people”.

    That “regime†is still existing today, with a name change and market liberalization, the ruling party is the Cambodian People Party i.e. Hun Sen’s party that was built by Viets post-Pol Pot.

    The Cambodian government, you admits in your previous post that it now “quietly opposes Vietnam on the South East Asia sea issue”. Whatever regime the viets built exist in name only.

    Today’s North Korea is still the same North Korea– it is even ruled by the same Kim family.

    No, Sihanouk lost every legitimacy when he supported Pol Pot/Khmer Rouge by China and US’s advice, he essentially becomes just another puppet like Puyi or Ming Mang, used by foreign powers to destabilize home country.

    That is not so according to the Cambodian people, who still regard his family as Cambodia’s Royal Family.

    See above why Sihanouk was not a puppet. And see above how you bite your own tongue every time you talk!!!

    The same way the US does to any of its enemy, massive amount of propaganda. Cambodia and Vietnam states still enjoy nice relationship, but because post-Vietnam withdrawal, there was surge of US-backed and chink-based ex-Khmer rouge party members back into the government.

    If “ex-Khmer rouge party members” went “back into the government”. That proves that your claim about the durability of the regime the viets installed is just a uselss face saving exercise.

    And no, Cambodia does not see an example in Champa, hell, Pol Pot massacres cham people under his reign.

    The viet did the same thing: “The case of the fallen Champa, by Suleiman Idres Bin”. There is something common about the viet and Pol Pot.

    No, Vietnam militarization of the islets are a reaction against China’s illegal grab of Paracel and the nine-dash-claim. Vietnam has no dispute with other countries, and ASEAN as a whole is united against chink aggression this year.
    https://asiatimes.com/2020/07/asean-stops-pulling-punches-over-south-china-sea/

    The Xishas was and is Chinese territory.

    http://chasfreeman.net/diplomacy-on-the-rocks-china-and-other-claimants-in-the-south-china-sea/

    The south viets once tried to illegally grab them but was beaten off.

    Take a long at the map I linked to earlier. The sea within the viet dash-line is almost as big as China’s. That means that on a per capita, or per unit land area, basis, the viet claim is many times bigger than China’s.

    Funny how chinks cooperate with CIA for over 10 years to fuck over Vietnam and Cambodia, and now they cry foul when another country has diplomatic relation with their rival.

    China also had “diplomatic dialogues” with Sihanouk and the Khmer Rouge when that helps in liberating Cambodian territory. What makes you think that only the viets can play this game?

    Uncle Ho only wanted to liberate Vietnam,

    Sihanouk wanted to liberate Cambodia.

    “Mao and Deng shook hands with Nixon and Kissinger” because the USSR was putting huge military pressure on China– at one stage even consider nuclear strikes against China. Why should China ignore its own security just to please some ungrateful viets?

    Lies. There’s active historical revisionism going around right now, and China refuses to apologize for supporting Pol Pot despite ADMITTING his wrongdoings.

    China never apologized for the vietcong and North viet army massacres either– BECAUSE China supported their fight against the murrikan invaders but NOT their massacres of the viet people. The north viet army and the vietcongs had to take their own responsibility for these actions, which China could not control BUT Uncle Ho and his gang could!!!

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massacre_at_Hu%E1%BA%BF

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-hidden-atrocities-of-the-vietnam-war-1538664997

    Again wrong, Pol Pot and Sihanouk were both used to bite Vietnam and prop up banditry, and in the end, they both failed. The government that rules Cambodia now is the government Vietnam establishes,..

    “Pol Pot and Sihanouk” BOTH had their own reasons to bite the viets and they used Chinese support to their own ends– Just like Uncle Ho did against the murrikans. By saying that, you are only admitting Ho and his gang are “criminals” like Pol Pot and Sihanouk .

    •ï¿½Replies: @Smith
    @Deep Thought

    You are losing this argument, and it's delicious, guess it's this one you won't save in a future copypasta.

    Of course, he played both sides. That is always the way the weak survives between the strongs. Uncle Ho played both sides too– the Chinese, the Russians. Through some OSS officer, he even tried to get murikans to support him against the French, I believe.
    �
    So you are asking question despite knowing the answers. And no, Ho Chi Minh has always stayed true to his ally and teacher, the USSR. Mao was an ally of the USSR but turns against it, and the whole 2nd world.

    IF Sihanouk “played both sidesâ€, then it means Sihanouk WAS the master who was playing both puppets– NOT being the puppet himself!!
    �
    Again, no, he was a puppet pushed around by Beijing and CIA, one day Beijing tells him to go lick Pol Pot’s ass, another day Beijing tells him to go the UN. His strings are high above.

    The Cambodian government, you admits in your previous post that it now “quietly opposes Vietnam on the South East Asia sea issueâ€. Whatever regime the viets built exist in name only.
    �
    That shows it is no puppet government and can perform its own politics, and no, what the Cambodians do, it’s their business. They have suffered enough already.

    That is not so according to the Cambodian people, who still regard his family as Cambodia’s Royal Family.
    �
    The Cambodian’s Royal head is entirely for show, the power lies in the government head by Hun Sen.

    If “ex-Khmer rouge party members†went “back into the governmentâ€. That proves that your claim about the durability of the regime the viets installed is just a uselss face saving exercise.
    �
    It’s true, the Viet government in Cambodia was damaged post 90s by the meddling of the UN, americans and China, that’s why it allows liberal democracy and privatization, but ruling party is still the same behind what we viets left behind. And the more it liberalizes, the worse it will get for the Cambodians.

    The viet did the same thing: “The case of the fallen Champa, by Suleiman Idres Binâ€. There is something common about the viet and Pol Pot.
    �
    I google that and look at what I found:
    https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/vietnamese-conquest-of-muslim-hindu-cham-and-their-current-situation.265898/
    Oh yes, more enraged foreigners about cham people, they are not even cham LOL and again btw, the cham people nowadays live freely in Vietnam.

    The Xishas was and is Chinese territory.
    �
    You mean Paracels/Hoang Sa, no, both island chains we have been colonized by the viets since the 15th century.
    And now, we don’t even want either of them, but just clear UNCLOS following the UN laws.

    China also had “diplomatic dialogues†with Sihanouk and the Khmer Rouge when that helps in liberating Cambodian territory.
    �
    China whisks away Sihanouk and then stores him in Pyongjang, and only summons him back as a face for CIA bandits to rally upon LOL even the Khmer rouge, his unlikely ally, hates his coward ass but uses his “royalty†as casus belli. And I didn't know "diplomatic dialogues" involves literally sending him guns and weapons for free.

    Sihanouk wanted to liberate Cambodia.
    �
    No, he doesn’t. He works directly with CIA and chinks in order to terrorize his own country near the Thailand’s border, working with Pol Pot. In fact, he’s the troublemaker.

    China never apologized for the vietcong and North viet army massacres either– BECAUSE China supported their fight against the murrikan invaders but NOT their massacres of the viet people.
    �
    China shouldn’t because there was no wrongdoing there, unlike Pol Pot. These “massacres†or “atrocitiesâ€, if indeed true, are small mistakes in comparison to what Ho Chi Minh has achieved for Vietnam.

    “Pol Pot and Sihanouk†BOTH had their own reasons to bite the viets and they used Chinese support to their own ends– Just like Uncle Ho did against the murrikans. By saying that, you are only admitting Ho and his gang are “criminals†like Pol Pot and Sihanouk .
    �
    Both Pol Pot and Sihanouk lost their country, then decided to side with foreign powers to terrorize their own people. Uncle Ho fought the japs, the frenchs, and later the americans for the sake of his people and he never allowed even (friendly) foreign troops to occupy Vietnam. He will always be remembered well by viets and the international world as a national hero and leader, unlike the likes of Pol Pot and Sihanouk, hell, or the likes of Meo and Dung LOL
    Oh and the Sino-Soviet split is entirely based on Meo’s greed

    Despite the Soviet Union having granted all of the territory of the Japanese puppet state of Manchukuo to Mao's communists in 1945, decisively assisting the communists in the Chinese Civil War, the Chinese now indirectly demanded territorial concessions on the basis that the 19th-century treaties transferring ownership of the sparsely populated Outer Manchuria, concluded by Qing dynasty China and the Russian Empire, were "Unequal Treaties", and amounted to annexation of rightful Chinese territory.
    �
    At the funeral of Ho Chi Minh

    At the same time, Nixon's message via Maurer had reached the Chinese, and it was decided in Beijing to "whet the appetite of the Americans" by making China appear stronger.[36] Zhou argued that a war with the Soviet Union would weaken China's hand vis-a-vis the United States.[36] The Chinese were more interested in the possibility of a rapprochement with the United States as a way of re-acquiring Taiwan than in having the United States as an ally against the Soviet Union.
    �
    How can anybody have respect for these traitors is beyond me, it’s beyond ridiculous.
    �
    �

    Replies: @Deep Thought
  • @showmethereal
    @Smith

    "During the 80s when Japan was “the bad guy†(only for the USA, the whole world loves Japan at the times, save for maybe China), plenty of shows (TV/movies series) of Japan still penetrate into worldwide market, such as Akira or Gundam or Macross or the Ghibli movies, it wasn’t total information blackout, in fact, 80s Japanese OVAs define the whole period along with 80s American action movies.

    And no, Ghibli anime like Spirited Away, released during the same period, is actually more popular than Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon in the US."

    Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon is the highest grossing foreign language film in US history... What are you talking about? Spirited Away was nowhere close overseas. Being the highest grossing film in Japanese history didn't mean it was overseas. Spirited Away did eventually better in China than any other market outside Japan. It was no big hit in the west. The fact it was in the tens of millions in other markets was seen as a big deal.. Here are the facts!

    https://www.boxofficemojo.com/releasegroup/gr1694585349/?ref_=bo_tt_gr_1

    https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0245429/

    https://www.sfgate.com/entertainment/article/VIEW-Worldwide-Asian-films-are-grossing-2733592.php

    Anime was NOT mainstream in western markets until the 2000's when cartoon channels started to play it. Prior to the 2000's it was very much a niche market... If it had a Japanese theme it was even MORE of a niche. The second biggest market for anime is China - not anywhere in the west.

    http://w3.salemstate.edu/~poehlkers/Emerson/Pokemon.html

    And finally - an analyst who breaks down the Japanese tailoring their games to meet the whims of the western market. As it states clearly - role playing games developed by Japan initially had a European theme and that when Japanese things like Pokemon were to be exported they made them more westernized.

    Replies: @Smith

    Now lemme deal with the old singy chink.

    1) is Ninja Gaiden even REMOTELY as popular as franchises that I named like Super Mario or Sonic – or Legend of Zelda???? No – not even remotely.

    Ninja Gaiden is one of the best franchises ever and widely recognized by people who play video games. If you search best games ever, you would find Ninja Gaiden. And Super Mario, Sonic, and Legend of Zelda are Japanese games, no matter how you think.

    2) you are talking about 2016 – I’m talking about the 1980’s… You seem to miss that fact.. And for the record Sony moved it’s videogame division headquarters to the US now. Also I looked up “Dark Soulsâ€. What on earth does that have to do with Japan and Japanese culture?????

    2016 is the foundation for 1980, the 1980s is the ninja and samurai boom where you see even western movies making films about ninja and samurai, and who can forget Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles?
    And what on Earth does Dark Souls have to do with Japanese culture? Aside from Japanese characters, Japanese weapons, Japanese fighting styles, and Japanese themes on the cosmic and Buddhist cycle of life? What is with this boomer? He can only see the external?

    3) China never wanted to popularize martial arts in the first place. You don’t get it that’s why Bruce Lee became who he became. He involved westerners in martial arts and is more famous than any Japanese star. My point is China didn’t seek to appease the west… The Japanese did after WW2.

    What do you mean China doesn’t? Is Hong Kong not China now? HK martial arts movies basically launch Bruce Lee and interest in wuxia and Chinese history. The fact (mainland) China “didn’t seek to appease the west†is wrong, considering immediately when China gets rich, it funds copycats of HK films and TV shows.

    4) false…. Western powers control western society and who is seen as good and who is seen as bad.

    The fact you care about how much western culture/society cares about Asian media shows that your brain has been rotten. It doesn’t matter one bit on what is their perception of Asian media. Asian media continues to grow and has successfully captured their market and gain a following, despite their pushback.

    Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon is the highest grossing foreign language film in US history… What are you talking about?

    OK, legit mistake there, but Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon did good in the US, but not so well in Asia, while Spirited Away does well in both and ends up grossing more as a result.

    Anime was NOT mainstream in western markets until the 2000’s when cartoon channels started to play it. Prior to the 2000’s it was very much a niche market… If it had a Japanese theme it was even MORE of a niche.

    Anime earns a cult status and every cool kids know anime like Akira, GoTS, and the whole world loves Doraemon, Dragon Ball Z, Mazinger Z or Gundam. Do you live in the US as a kid or something? The fact anime becomes mainstream in the US and even topples western cartoons and comics show their strength and foundation since the 80s.

    And finally – an analyst who breaks down the Japanese tailoring their games to meet the whims of the western market.

    Even the analyst disagrees with you:

    The decision to Americanize the TV show carries with it a number of ironies. First, despite the adaptation of the show described above, various aspects of the show including plot lines and relationships between characters can be easily read as Japanese. A column in the New York Times (Strom, 1999 November 7) argued that, in fact, Pokemon served to teach American children such traditional Japanese values as empathy and perseverance at all costs. Second, the Japanese origin of the program, for many children, is not a negative but in fact an important part of the show/phenomenon’s attractiveness. Japan is well-known by young video game players (particularly those tied into the internet) to be the source of most signficant video game innovations; anime is also gradually building an image as “cutting-edge” entertainment. The show, therefore, is used by some to gain knowledge of Japanese culture and access to the cutting edge.

    Even when they changes the exterior of Pokemon to be more westernized, it still introduces Japanese culture and thus increasing its soft power in the West, and even making Japan “cool”.
    As demonstrated, you have no understanding of culture or aesthetics. You see the exterior and not knowing the interior, are you secretly an old murican boomer who lives in Singy?

    •ï¿½Replies: @Showmethereal
    @Smith

    You arent too bright... Classic example of someone who lacks reasoning ability - so has to resort to insults. And you are replying to a comment not directed at you but failed to address the one I did.

    1) No Ninja Gaiden was nowhere as popular. Sales tell the story.

    2) western kids did not think of teenage mutant ninja turtles nor Pokemon as Japanese.... Which in terms of Pokemon was on purpose. That is not my opinion.

    3) when Bruce Lee was alive Hong Kong was not China. It was a part of the British Empire. Its really sad how clueless you are. Bruce Lee's films were all about defending Chinese honor but he himself while ethnically Chinese was a US citizen who grew up in the British territory of Hong Kong. You really think you are smart but are clueless.

    Spritited Away did best in Japan and second best in China. Everywhere else it was a niche product. That is a fact of numbers not opinion.

    Are you pretending to be Japanese now? Did you forget you are supposed to be Japanese?

    End of story - your soft power is weak when you have to cater to foreigners to make yourself palatable. If you have real soft power they take you as you are. Americans and secondarily Europeans have real soft power. Asians do - but not so much in the western world. In the western world in spite of your prejudiced against Chinese opinion - Japanese are known as hard working - but little is really known about the overall culture.

    Replies: @Smith
  • Smith says:
    @Deep Thought
    @Smith


    So the HCM trail is invasion now? Funny because that was allowed by Sihanouk, who also allows the bombing of Vietnamese, fair is fair.
    �
    Never heard that Sihanouk "allowed" either nam or murrika to invade Cambodian territory. He had no choice because Cambodia was so much weaker than either. That also explains why Pol Pot hated both so much. What makes you think that the viets are the only people who is capable of hating their enemies?

    Viet pretty much built up the modern and stable Cambodian government in 10 years and get out due to massive crippling sanctions imposed by nearly the whole world
    �
    If the puppet regime that the viet built were "stable", it would still be there today for the whole world to see.

    North Korea is the example of a country "sanctioned by nearly the whole world"-- apart from China and a few others-- and it is stable and is still around. But that is NOT due to the effort of nam.

    The legitimate Cambodian government was/is the government of Sihanouk-- Even YOU yourself admit it by making the "allowed by Sihanouk" claim. His family is still accepted by the Cambodian people as the Royal Family of Cambodia. So, where is your "legitimate", and "stable", viet puppet Cambodian regime today?

    It allows China sponsorship and quietly opposes Vietnam on the South East Asia sea issue, but relationship has not deteriorated like Pol Pot era, nice try to divide and conquer.
    �
    If nam is so nice to Cambodia and the relationship between them is so good, how is it possible for China to "divide and conquer" at all? Maybe, the Cambodians see an example in Champa?!!!

    But do say bring it on, we viets live in peace and do not fear any of you bullies. The moment you invade us is the end of you and all of the “peace and prosperity†bullcrap image you built yourself on.
    �
    Tell the Champas about viets living in peace! The Cambodians are clearly not stupid enough to believe it. They are very serious about viet bullying in the region.

    nam is the one who grabbed the most islets in SCS-- and almost ALL of them are in OTHER PEOPLE's economic zones. In order words, the viets ARE the invaders!!! So, stop the crap that the viets are the most peaceable people in the region.

    We are still waiting to see HOW nam is going to "end" us and our "peace and prosperity". So, "bring it on"!!!

    But if they invade us, we will help the cambodian people again, so that Cambodia is free of bandits funded by Asian American CIA chinkies. You are welcome.
    �
    If you had followed news at all, you should know that amelika has already invaded you with their warships, all because the nam leaders "allowed" that to happen-- something that even Sihanouk did not do with respect to Cambodia. The murikans did not go into nam with guns blazing this time but, if my memory serves me, some murikan sailors are said to have caught Covid 19 after their viet trip. Just wonder how?!

    Mao and Deng are basically just opportunist pigs who join hands with the Great Satan to hurt their neighbors, no difference than the Empire of Japan.
    �
    Mao also joined hands with Uncle Ho. So, Uncle's nam must be the "Great Satan" that hurt its smaller neighbours!

    Japan tried to conquer China, when the latter was divided and weak, but failed. nam did the same in Cambodia. That is close resemblance in opportunism and empire building.

    China was fully aware of these atrocities, in fact, it and the USA are the two funders who kept the banditry/civil war in Cambodia as well as the clown seat in the UN for the next 10 years after his regime is ousted. China funds him in order to bite Vietnam, and only stops after Vietnam has withdrawn, but now China denies any involvement or knowledge LOL
    �
    Yes, China did but there was no denial. China and the Cambodian nationalists made a deliberate decision to USE the atrocious Pol Pot to oust the viet invaders so that their Kingdom could be restored afterwards. It turned out that it worked according to plan. nam has one Champa fewer and got bitter about it.

    Replies: @Smith

    I’m gonna respond to this guy’s first, since he’s trying to form the narrative that Vietnam was guilty for “invading” Cambodia, never mind the crazy shit the CIA and chinkies did by supporting Pol Pot.

    Never heard that Sihanouk “allowed†either nam or murrika to invade Cambodian territory.

    He played both sides when he was head of state in the 60s, and yes , he “allowed” it.

    In early 1964, Sihanouk signed a secret agreement with North Vietnam and the Viet Cong, allowing Chinese military aid meant for them to be delivered through Sihanoukville’s port. In turn, the Cambodian army would be paid for delivering food supplies to the Viet Cong, and at the same time skim off 10 percent of all military hardware supplies.[93] In addition, he also allowed the Viet Cong to build a trail through eastern Cambodia, so that their troops could receive war supplies from North Vietnam. The trail later became known as the Sihanouk Trail.[94] When the US learned of Viet Cong presence in eastern Cambodia, they started a bombing campaign,[95] spurring Sihanouk to sever diplomatic ties with the US in May 1965.[94] As a result of this secret agreement, Communist countries, including China, the Soviet Union, and Czechoslovakia, provided military aid to Cambodia.[96]

    As relations with China worsened, Sihanouk pursued rapprochement with the US. He learned that Kennedy’s widow, Jacqueline Kennedy, had expressed a desire to see Angkor Wat.[111] Seeing this as an opportunity to restore relations with the US, Sihanouk invited her to visit Cambodia and personally hosted her visit in October 1967.[112] Jacqueline Kennedy’s visit paved the way for Sihanouk to meet with Chester Bowles, the US ambassador to India. To Bowles, Sihanouk expressed his willingness to restore bilateral relations with the US, hinted at the presence of Viet Cong troops in Cambodia, and suggested he would turn a blind eye should US forces enter Cambodia to attack Viet Cong troops retreating into Cambodia from South Vietnam—a practice known as “hot pursuit”—provided that Cambodians were unharmed.[113][114] Silhanouk told Bowles that he disliked the Vietnamese as a people, saying he had no love for any Vietnamese, red, blue, North or South”.[115]

    Sihanouk was pretty much a puppet pushed around, first by the US, and then China. Much like Pol Pot, hell, he was used as a figure to rally for Pol Pot/Khmer Rouge after Khmer Rouge was ousted.

    That also explains why Pol Pot hated both so much. What makes you think that the viets are the only people who is capable of hating their enemies?

    If Pol Pot hated “both” so much, why does he become a CIA bandit and enjoys full western and chink support to kill and destabilize his own people?

    If the puppet regime that the viet built were “stableâ€, it would still be there today for the whole world to see.

    That “regime” is still existing today, with a name change and market liberalization, the ruling party is the Cambodian People Party i.e. Hun Sen’s party that was built by Viets post-Pol Pot.

    North Korea is the example of a country “sanctioned by nearly the whole worldâ€â€“ apart from China and a few others– and it is stable and is still around. But that is NOT due to the effort of nam.

    North Korea is Korea divided in half, and North Korea was supported not only by China, but also the rest of the Eastern bloc. Vietnam in Cambodia manages to keep the whole territory and establish a working government that still lasts today DESPITE being sanctioned by most of the world (with the sole exception of the Eastern bloc sans China).

    The legitimate Cambodian government was/is the government of Sihanouk– Even YOU yourself admit it by making the “allowed by Sihanouk†claim.

    No, Sihanouk lost every legitimacy when he supported Pol Pot/Khmer Rouge by China and US’s advice, he essentially becomes just another puppet like Puyi or Ming Mang, used by foreign powers to destabilize home country.

    If nam is so nice to Cambodia and the relationship between them is so good, how is it possible for China to “divide and conquer†at all? Maybe, the Cambodians see an example in Champa?!!!

    The same way the US does to any of its enemy, massive amount of propaganda. Cambodia and Vietnam states still enjoy nice relationship, but because post-Vietnam withdrawal, there was surge of US-backed and chink-based ex-Khmer rouge party members back into the government. And no, Cambodia does not see an example in Champa, hell, Pol Pot massacres cham people under his reign.

    Tell the Champas about viets living in peace! The Cambodians are clearly not stupid enough to believe it. They are very serious about viet bullying in the region.

    You can visit Vietnam right now and ask about cham people currently living here. Cambodian under Pol Pot is clearly stupid enough to be receive CIA money and chink guns just to kill his own people and invade Vietnam.

    nam is the one who grabbed the most islets in SCS– and almost ALL of them are in OTHER PEOPLE’s economic zones. In order words, the viets ARE the invaders!!! So, stop the crap that the viets are the most peaceable people in the region.

    No, Vietnam militarization of the islets are a reaction against China’s illegal grab of Paracel and the nine-dash-claim. Vietnam has no dispute with other countries, and ASEAN as a whole is united against chink aggression this year.
    https://asiatimes.com/2020/07/asean-stops-pulling-punches-over-south-china-sea/

    If you had followed news at all, you should know that amelika has already invaded you with their warships, all because the nam leaders “allowed†that to happen– something that even Sihanouk did not do with respect to Cambodia.

    Invasion? We allow them in as a gesture of diplomatic dialogue, they do not occupy as and they leave as we tell them to, there’s no foreign base in Vietnam. Funny how chinks cooperate with CIA for over 10 years to fuck over Vietnam and Cambodia, and now they cry foul when another country has diplomatic relation with their rival.

    Mao also joined hands with Uncle Ho. So, Uncle’s nam must be the “Great Satan†that hurt its smaller neighbours!

    Uncle Ho only wanted to liberate Vietnam, Uncle Ho never invaded any of his neighbors, and Vietnam only invades Cambodia after it has massacred vietnamese in Vietnam’s territory. Meanwhile, Mao and Deng shakes hands with Nixon and Kissinger, those who bomb both Cambodia and Vietnam, and sustain the banditry that was Pol Pot for over 10 years and worse, invade Vietnam for no reason!

    Japan tried to conquer China, when the latter was divided and weak, but failed. nam did the same in Cambodia. That is close resemblance in opportunism and empire building.

    Vietnam invades Cambodia to stop the attacks by Pol Pot and also provide aids to the Cambodian people, meanwhile, chinks attack Vietnam because it dares going against Pol Pot’s banditry, and you talk about opportunism?

    Yes, China did but there was no denial.

    Lies. There’s active historical revisionism going around right now, and China refuses to apologize for supporting Pol Pot despite ADMITTING his wrongdoings.

    In December 2000, while Jiang was visiting Cambodia, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China issued a statement that Beijing never supported the wrong policies of Khmer Rouge while it was governing Cambodia and refused to apologize.[166][167][168]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambodian_genocide#War_crimes_trials
    After this, there is NO point ever in trusting chinks, they are lying through their teeth.

    China and the Cambodian nationalists made a deliberate decision to USE the atrocious Pol Pot to oust the viet invaders so that their Kingdom could be restored afterwards. It turned out that it worked according to plan.

    Again wrong, Pol Pot and Sihanouk were both used to bite Vietnam and prop up banditry, and in the end, they both failed. The government that rules Cambodia now is the government Vietnam establishes, with Hun Sen as the head. Sihanouk is a greedy puppet who himself abdicates in 2004 because he has no power nor support.

    You can keep going, but the more you go, the more criminals you make Mao, Deng and modern China look in the Khmer Rouge period. You essentially were funding ISIS (Khmer Rouge) and Juan Gaido-equivalence (Pol Pot and Sihanouk) to strangehold countries (Cambodia and Vietnam).

  • @Deep Thought
    @showmethereal


    ‘China wants to lead, rather simply join’: top Australian diplomat takes aim at Beijing’s foreign policy

    Frances Adamson has accused Beijing of setting its own agenda internationally rather than working collaboratively with other countries

    She says the main challenge for Australia is helping to shape a new global order without the influence of an inwardly focused US

    https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/3111354/china-wants-lead-rather-simply-join-top-australian-diplomat
    �
    How dare these Chinese actually WANT to lead???!!! That is an unbearable affront to the Whites' dignity.

    Don't they know that only the Whites are entitled to lead in this world? Now, "without the influence of an inwardly focused US", "America's deputy sheriff in Asia" must "shape a new global order"-- that actually follows an OLD formula of domination by the White race-- in which a dark, inconspicuous, PLACE in a corner will be reserved to put these over-ambitious Chinese in.

    Replies: @showmethereal, @Deep Thought

    Yes indeed… But what else can one expect from someone who represents the 5 Eyes. Nobody else should be able to set rules in their eyes. The economic balance is shifting back toward Asia. So why do they expect Asia not to have a say… China being the largest in China – it should be expected China would want more of a say.

  • @Smith
    @showmethereal

    Wrong on both accounts.

    During the 80s when Japan was "the bad guy" (only for the USA, the whole world loves Japan at the times, save for maybe China), plenty of shows (TV/movies series) of Japan still penetrate into worldwide market, such as Akira or Gundam or Macross or the Ghibli movies, it wasn't total information blackout, in fact, 80s Japanese OVAs define the whole period along with 80s American action movies.

    And no, Ghibli anime like Spirited Away, released during the same period, is actually more popular than Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon in the US.

    But nowadays the range has been lessened, movies can be successful in China only and carry the box office.
    Seeing the list of successful non-English movies nowadays, most of all are chinese films.
    https://imgur.com/8w9os2G

    The most popular anime recently is also a Japanese-centric series with next to no "gaijin" characters, Kimetsu no Yaiba.
    https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/vsbattles/images/3/33/Demon_Slayer.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20190423175609

    On the video game front, japanese-centric games also dominate:
    https://twinfinite.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/sekiro-16.jpg
    https://assets.vg247.com/current/2019/08/nioh_2-5.jpg

    With the recent game, Sakuna, literally being japanese rice culture:
    http://cdn4.dualshockers.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Sakuna_-Of-Rice-and-Ruin-06.png

    So no, I think you doth protest too much and base yourself on the PERCEPTION of american media on asian, than actual asian media existing right now.

    Replies: @songbird, @showmethereal

    “During the 80s when Japan was “the bad guy†(only for the USA, the whole world loves Japan at the times, save for maybe China), plenty of shows (TV/movies series) of Japan still penetrate into worldwide market, such as Akira or Gundam or Macross or the Ghibli movies, it wasn’t total information blackout, in fact, 80s Japanese OVAs define the whole period along with 80s American action movies.

    And no, Ghibli anime like Spirited Away, released during the same period, is actually more popular than Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon in the US.”

    Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon is the highest grossing foreign language film in US history… What are you talking about? Spirited Away was nowhere close overseas. Being the highest grossing film in Japanese history didn’t mean it was overseas. Spirited Away did eventually better in China than any other market outside Japan. It was no big hit in the west. The fact it was in the tens of millions in other markets was seen as a big deal.. Here are the facts!

    https://www.boxofficemojo.com/releasegroup/gr1694585349/?ref_=bo_tt_gr_1

    https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0245429/

    https://www.sfgate.com/entertainment/article/VIEW-Worldwide-Asian-films-are-grossing-2733592.php

    Anime was NOT mainstream in western markets until the 2000’s when cartoon channels started to play it. Prior to the 2000’s it was very much a niche market… If it had a Japanese theme it was even MORE of a niche. The second biggest market for anime is China – not anywhere in the west.

    http://w3.salemstate.edu/~poehlkers/Emerson/Pokemon.html

    And finally – an analyst who breaks down the Japanese tailoring their games to meet the whims of the western market. As it states clearly – role playing games developed by Japan initially had a European theme and that when Japanese things like Pokemon were to be exported they made them more westernized.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Smith
    @showmethereal

    Now lemme deal with the old singy chink.

    1) is Ninja Gaiden even REMOTELY as popular as franchises that I named like Super Mario or Sonic – or Legend of Zelda???? No – not even remotely.
    �
    Ninja Gaiden is one of the best franchises ever and widely recognized by people who play video games. If you search best games ever, you would find Ninja Gaiden. And Super Mario, Sonic, and Legend of Zelda are Japanese games, no matter how you think.

    2) you are talking about 2016 – I’m talking about the 1980’s… You seem to miss that fact.. And for the record Sony moved it’s videogame division headquarters to the US now. Also I looked up “Dark Soulsâ€. What on earth does that have to do with Japan and Japanese culture?????
    �
    2016 is the foundation for 1980, the 1980s is the ninja and samurai boom where you see even western movies making films about ninja and samurai, and who can forget Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles?
    And what on Earth does Dark Souls have to do with Japanese culture? Aside from Japanese characters, Japanese weapons, Japanese fighting styles, and Japanese themes on the cosmic and Buddhist cycle of life? What is with this boomer? He can only see the external?

    3) China never wanted to popularize martial arts in the first place. You don’t get it that’s why Bruce Lee became who he became. He involved westerners in martial arts and is more famous than any Japanese star. My point is China didn’t seek to appease the west… The Japanese did after WW2.
    �
    What do you mean China doesn’t? Is Hong Kong not China now? HK martial arts movies basically launch Bruce Lee and interest in wuxia and Chinese history. The fact (mainland) China “didn’t seek to appease the west†is wrong, considering immediately when China gets rich, it funds copycats of HK films and TV shows.

    4) false…. Western powers control western society and who is seen as good and who is seen as bad.
    �
    The fact you care about how much western culture/society cares about Asian media shows that your brain has been rotten. It doesn’t matter one bit on what is their perception of Asian media. Asian media continues to grow and has successfully captured their market and gain a following, despite their pushback.

    Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon is the highest grossing foreign language film in US history… What are you talking about?
    �
    OK, legit mistake there, but Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon did good in the US, but not so well in Asia, while Spirited Away does well in both and ends up grossing more as a result.

    Anime was NOT mainstream in western markets until the 2000’s when cartoon channels started to play it. Prior to the 2000’s it was very much a niche market… If it had a Japanese theme it was even MORE of a niche.
    �
    Anime earns a cult status and every cool kids know anime like Akira, GoTS, and the whole world loves Doraemon, Dragon Ball Z, Mazinger Z or Gundam. Do you live in the US as a kid or something? The fact anime becomes mainstream in the US and even topples western cartoons and comics show their strength and foundation since the 80s.

    And finally – an analyst who breaks down the Japanese tailoring their games to meet the whims of the western market.
    �
    Even the analyst disagrees with you:

    The decision to Americanize the TV show carries with it a number of ironies. First, despite the adaptation of the show described above, various aspects of the show including plot lines and relationships between characters can be easily read as Japanese. A column in the New York Times (Strom, 1999 November 7) argued that, in fact, Pokemon served to teach American children such traditional Japanese values as empathy and perseverance at all costs. Second, the Japanese origin of the program, for many children, is not a negative but in fact an important part of the show/phenomenon's attractiveness. Japan is well-known by young video game players (particularly those tied into the internet) to be the source of most signficant video game innovations; anime is also gradually building an image as "cutting-edge" entertainment. The show, therefore, is used by some to gain knowledge of Japanese culture and access to the cutting edge.
    �
    Even when they changes the exterior of Pokemon to be more westernized, it still introduces Japanese culture and thus increasing its soft power in the West, and even making Japan "cool".
    As demonstrated, you have no understanding of culture or aesthetics. You see the exterior and not knowing the interior, are you secretly an old murican boomer who lives in Singy?

    Replies: @Showmethereal
  • Thulean Friend ought to consider another metric when assessing China’s future potential as compared to the U.S. The U.S. public schools are teaching that learning math and having future time orientation are “racist”. Meanwhile, millions of Chinese students are learning advanced calculus. It doesn’t take much brains to realize that China’s GDP will be at least 3-4 times that of ours, if not 5-6 times greater., and apparently the majority of Americans voted for the presidential candidate of the party that wants to increase this insanity (if you believe the MSM, that is).

    Trust me on this one. The future is China.

  • @Brian Damage
    @Daniel Chieh

    The main problem but also a blessing is China's leadership. It is shaped by a bunch of stiff engineers who looked for solutions in inorganic ways. Effective but cold.

    It is a blessing because bypassing redtapes and consensus, these engineers were able to tackle complex problems facing China immediately. The enormous growth of the past few decades can be attributed to this.

    It is a problem because as China's economy matures, it naturally will compete with higher value added economies like the US and that's when soft power, a great multiplier comes into play. Having these engineers and their engineer subordinates to coordinate some kind of a soft power offensive is like having a math nerd with zero social skills trying tell others how to get girls.

    I feel China has reached a point where it has to recruit artists into its leadership. By artist, I meant people who are creative visionaries.

    As a country progress, it must be organic, cohesive and strategic. Sort of like Japan but in a Chinese way.

    Replies: @Munga Bulga, @Astuteobservor II

    I am sorry, but anyone who espouses soft power over hard power would be really brain damaged.

    The American military budget should slap you silly.

    The Chinese around 1900 would probably kill you on sight for saying something so stupid.

    The America today would not exist.

    Saddam is crawling out of his grave to strangle you with the rope that hanged him.

    Soft power comes naturally with hard power. With money. With status.

    Telling the chinese to forsake hard power to pursue soft power is the same as telling them to commit suicide.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Brian Damage
    @Astuteobservor II


    "I am sorry, but anyone who espouses soft power over hard power would be really brain damaged.

    The American military budget should slap you silly.

    The Chinese around 1900 would probably kill you on sight for saying something so stupid.

    The America today would not exist.

    Saddam is crawling out of his grave to strangle you with the rope that hanged him.

    Soft power comes naturally with hard power. With money. With status.

    Telling the chinese to forsake hard power to pursue soft power is the same as telling them to commit suicide."
    �
    Who said "to forsake hard power to pursue soft power"? What is this? A Zero sum game between Hard and Soft power? Stiff engineer thinking perhaps. Hard power is necessary but soft power will smooth the process. Soft power do not come from Hard Power. "Soft power comes naturally with hard power. With money. With status." as you said, exposed your ignorance of Soft Power. Many people with no money have more soft power than the rich folks. Maybe you think Soft Power is to buy people's favor. That's not soft power. That's bribery. The money stops, the fawning stops. Soft power comes from free-will. The US is very powerful but how about soft power? Not much from the hardliners but a lot of soft power from the progressive side. Why? Because people can identify with it.

    Italy and Japan definitely does not have the hard power and they multiplied their powers tenfold because of their soft power. As messed up as both countries in many areas.

    You know why people can still get away with accusing China of organ harvesting, being dirty, poor, disease spreader, concentration camps, human rights violations? When it is so easy to dispel these. With nerdy engineers at the helm, they will respond like as though they are building a bridge. Will not work. Like I said before, it is like a math nerd with no social skills trying to teach others now to get girls. Probably methodically, theoretical but lack any practical results in real life.
  • @Smith
    @Deep Thought

    & @ Astuteobservor II

    This must be famous “hurt feelings of the chinese people".

    I'm sorry, my chink friends, for your hurt feelings, but talking and discussion of China history in a topic about China isn't off-topic.

    @ d dan

    One question: is there any proof that Zheng He could "easily" set up colonies in these nations if he "tried" to?

    That's a funny thing to assume, because the Ming indeed put troops in Vietnam and were beaten back by Le Loi’s army who were tribesmen at the times. And Vietnam shares a land border with Ming China.

    The chinks love to play up Zheng He's fleets, but their actual military accomplishment in foreign land shows a different reality.

    I fear that after American exceptionalism, Chinese exceptionalism will be the next thing, where the talking point would be WE CHAYNESE COULDA CONQUA DA WHOLE WORLD WE JUST CHOSE NOT TO, and history repeats itself.

    Replies: @Deep Thought, @Astuteobservor II, @Philip Owen

    I can’t speak for other anons, so I won’t.

    The fact that you think I am Chinese just proved every single one of my points in my comments in replies to you.

    Are you even vietnamese? Do you know what is good for Vietnam? Do you understand what is bad for Vietnam?

    I sincerely hope there are vietnamese smarter than you.

    •ï¿½Agree: showmethereal
  • •ï¿½Replies: @AltanBakshi
    @Blinky Bill

    What the hell? Like emperor Qianglongs China was weaker economically, politically or militarilly than UK and the Dutch? Humbug! Utter nonsense! Only after the industrialization really began in the early 19th centuy, did the UK grow stronger.

    Replies: @Lake Wobegon
  • @last straw
    @showmethereal

    A lot of people have no idea that China is full of innovators and entrepreneurs nowadays. Causal observers just do not realize that China is changing at neck-breaking speed in recent years. China not only has NEV makers, they also have first-class EV battery makers such as BYD, CATL, and SVolt that are at the cutting edge of one of the most important EV technologies. Both CATL and SVolt are planning to build gigafactories in Germany that will provide batteries for hundreds of thousands EVs in Europe each year.

    Replies: @d dan, @showmethereal

    Correct… BYD is also bringing innovation to batteries. They are doing so in buses and passenger cars now.

  • @d dan
    @Philip Owen


    "The British were invited. The Sultan of Kedah wanted support against his enemies. "
    �
    So was Zheng He. But unlike the British, Portuguese, French or Dutch, Zheng He did not try to colonize any of the tiny kingdoms, nor capitalize on the conflicts among them. The few big military operations he did was to help the Palembang defeated a 5000-men strong Chinese pirate group led by Chen Zuyi 陈祖义. By that time, there were already big Chinese diaspora who were friendly to the Ming, including many militarily superior Chinese forces/friendly kingdoms, so Zheng He could easily set up many colonies if he or the Ming emperor wanted. Instead, Zheng He concentrated his missions to almost exclusive peaceful purposes. He presented gifts of gold, silver, porcelain, and silk to the locals, and in return, received novelties such as ostriches, zebras, camels, and ivory. He built temples, mosque and monuments, brought foreign diplomats to China, developed relations between China and Islamic countries. For example, in 1961, the Indonesian Islamic leader and scholar Hamka credited Zheng He for playing an important role in the development of Islam in Indonesia.

    Zheng He's fleet was delicious - it is still making so many Whites and half Whites angry after 600 years. What is little known is that China actually has a long history of extensive seafaring and overseas trades and activities, dating back to the Han dynasty 2000 years ago. For example, during the Three Kingdoms Period, the king of Wu sent a 20-year diplomatic mission led by Zhu Ying and Kang Tai along the coast of Asia, which reached as far as the Eastern Roman Empire. By Song dynasty, 200 years before Zheng He, Chinese already established a large networks of commercial trade outposts, interests and settlements throughout the South East Asia and India Ocean. There were also joint anti-pirate activities with local kingdom and even European forces.

    Ref: Deng, Gang (2005). Chinese Maritime Activities and Socioeconomic Development, c. 2100 BC – 1900 AD. Greenwood Press.

    Replies: @d dan, @Philip Owen, @showmethereal

    Correct… Little in the west is known about Chinese seafaring innovation over the centuries. And since this is about GDP – they should not be shocked at how China has come to have the largest ship industry in the world now. They can say what they want about Xi – but he is absolutely clear that China needed to go back to the sea to not repeat the error of the Ming and the Qing in retreating and ignoring. China set about building a maritime militia and fishing fleet – the largest in the world before building up the navy. In the same way they are not doing it colonize others like the 5 Eyes claims.

  • @Daniel Chieh
    @Showmethereal

    Your argument is incoherent on multiple levels.

    1. Someone who played Ninja Gaiden enough to actually form parts of his identity from it will identify with the main character and sympathize to formerly foreign names and ideas. He will find the ideas of ninjas, demons and the outlines of the story to be cool. He will associate his happiness while playing with these formerly foreign aspects such as Japanese words. He will likely find girls in yukatas sexy.

    He doesn't need to want to be a ninja. The impact of soft power is enough in that it builds a sense of familiarity.

    If for some reason someday he ever needs to make a decision on something Chinese vs Japanese, our video game player has a now unconscious basis of positive feelings for Japanese.

    2. You are incorrect on popularity. Japanese themed games, almost surprisingly, smash record sales.

    https://gamingbolt.com/sekiro-shadows-die-twice-tops-media-create-charts-with-almost-160k-copies-sold

    Sekiro: Shadows Die Twice is now the developer’s second title to reach “No. 1 in All Formats†in the UK, with the first being Dark Souls 3, which released in 2016.

    �
    The UK is part of the West. Dark Souls 3 was ALSO another Japanese game from the same studio. But even if you were correct, Call of Duty runs on PlayStation, which is Japanese.

    3. Nonsequitor of origin of Japanese style is meaningless. It doesn't matter where ninjitsu comes from. It doesn't matter where flour from bread comes from, the consumer only experiences the end product and makes associations on the bread with the store and brand he purchased. In fact, if China has the same base qualities but is unable to make it marketable, it just shows the Chinese as being additionally incapable.

    Fortunately, like I said, the more successful Chinese soft power generators like miohiyo are ignoring your line of thinking. It is a concern if your line of thinking is common, though, because its immeasurably wrong and fundamentally poor for soft power. China has been horrible at the latter. She needs to get over herself and learn from those who do it better.

    Replies: @Brian Damage, @showmethereal

    1) is Ninja Gaiden even REMOTELY as popular as franchises that I named like Super Mario or Sonic – or Legend of Zelda???? No – not even remotely.

    2) you are talking about 2016 – I’m talking about the 1980’s… You seem to miss that fact.. And for the record Sony moved it’s videogame division headquarters to the US now. Also I looked up “Dark Souls”. What on earth does that have to do with Japan and Japanese culture?????

    3) China never wanted to popularize martial arts in the first place. You don’t get it that’s why Bruce Lee became who he became. He involved westerners in martial arts and is more famous than any Japanese star. My point is China didn’t seek to appease the west… The Japanese did after WW2.

    4) false…. Western powers control western society and who is seen as good and who is seen as bad. Pew Research reflects that. Look at the plot to “Tomorrow Never Dies”. China yet wasn’t the bad guy so the plot to the film… But back when the Chinese were the bad guys previously such as in Dr. No or The Man with the Golden Gun – i’m sure Pew results would reflect. In the 70’s Japanese were portrayed in the west as docile and subservient… By the 80’s when Japan became the bad guy because of her economic rise – she was portrayed as ruthless again. If you can find Pew results they would reflect that in western societies.

  • @Smith
    @Deep Thought


    Very funny indeed. nam was in Cambodia before the Khmer Rouge took power. They could claim revenge against nam– just like you are claim revenge for border raids, which came afterwards.
    �
    So the HCM trail is invasion now? Funny because that was allowed by Sihanouk, who also allows the bombing of Vietnamese, fair is fair. North Vietnam made no push against the government until the outsing of Sihanouk, which allowed Lon Nok to allow South Vietnam in, and the invasion only starts AFTER Pol Pot massacred vietnamese in Vietnam borders.

    The viets (like you) had/have “turned into radical anti-Chinese nationalism†after China helping them winning the war against the Amerlikans. So, why should you be surprised that China wanted to “put a stop to it†in Cambodia???!!! You must be a believer of Nam Exceptionalism!!!
    �
    Where is the radical anti-Chinese nationalism? We see chinks attacking Vietnam territory, funding Pol Pot to raid and invade Vietnam and then raising hell in Cambodia, and now occupying Vietnam sea territories. And yes, it is surprising that chinks decide to team up with USA to fund a bandit like Pol Pot fighting against the legit Cambodian govt, established by Cambodian and Vietnam communists, and join hands with the western pigs and lackeys to sanction both Vietnam and Cambodia. That speaks the level of opportunism, that Mao and Deng are basically just opportunist pigs who join hands with the Great Satan to hurt their neighbors, no difference than the Empire of Japan.

    But China turn against them later because nam became the invader and Khmer Rouge for its genocides against the Cambodians.
    �
    Absolutely false, China was fully aware of these atrocities, in fact, it and the USA are the two funders who kept the banditry/civil war in Cambodia as well as the clown seat in the UN for the next 10 years after his regime is ousted. China funds him in order to bite Vietnam, and only stops after Vietnam has withdrawn, but now China denies any involvement or knowledge LOL

    That is about the same length of time the Amelikans stayed in nam. It is no coincidence!!!
    �
    Lol wut? French stayed in Vietnam for nearly a hundred year, Americans stay in Nam for over 20 years. Meanwhile, Viet pretty much built up the modern and stable Cambodian government in 10 years and get out due to massive crippling sanctions imposed by nearly the whole world (except Eastern Bloc comrades).

    The Cambodian government now allies with China and keeps a weary eye on nam.
    �
    It allows China sponsorship and quietly opposes Vietnam on the South East Asia sea issue, but relationship has not deteriorated like Pol Pot era, nice try to divide and conquer.

    “Think†what you want. USSR is no more and Russia, its successor, depends largely on China for it economic wellbeing. The whole of “Eastern block†is full of holes in itself. nam was, and is, useful to them, and Amelka, when they want nam to become their pawn against China. I am sure that nam will fall for it.
    �
    Ah, the evil imperalist now says his word, he has no trust in his neighbor, this explains his strategy in the South East Asia sea:
    - intentionally keep sea lanes unclear to provoke neighbors
    - cry foul when neighbors start to make dialogue with rival hegemony (despite the fact they themselves have partnered with rival hegemony before hands)
    - prepare invasion plan for neighbor
    Exactly like Pol Pot's "pre-emptive" strike policy.
    Meanwhile, Vietnam has stayed neutral in this US-China feud (we know the USA cannot be trusted, like chinks), and only pursuits legal attacks against China's imperialism in the South East Asia sea. But do say bring it on, we viets live in peace and do not fear any of you bullies. The moment you invade us is the end of you and all of the "peace and prosperity" bullcrap image you built yourself on.

    I modern days, Cambodia sees through the true nature of nam and finds an Asian Amelika in nam. If “the third most powerful military†came again, they would turnCambodia nam’s new “Vietnam†again!.
    �
    It is funny because anti-Vietnam sentiment is entirely founded by US-backed parties in Cambodia that massively sponsor propaganda campaigns against Vietnam, so much for “see throughâ€, you are already “Asian amelikaâ€. But if they invade us, we will help the cambodian people again, so that Cambodia is free of bandits funded by Asian American CIA chinkies. You are welcome.

    Replies: @Deep Thought

    So the HCM trail is invasion now? Funny because that was allowed by Sihanouk, who also allows the bombing of Vietnamese, fair is fair.

    Never heard that Sihanouk “allowed” either nam or murrika to invade Cambodian territory. He had no choice because Cambodia was so much weaker than either. That also explains why Pol Pot hated both so much. What makes you think that the viets are the only people who is capable of hating their enemies?

    [MORE]

    Viet pretty much built up the modern and stable Cambodian government in 10 years and get out due to massive crippling sanctions imposed by nearly the whole world

    If the puppet regime that the viet built were “stable”, it would still be there today for the whole world to see.

    North Korea is the example of a country “sanctioned by nearly the whole world”– apart from China and a few others– and it is stable and is still around. But that is NOT due to the effort of nam.

    The legitimate Cambodian government was/is the government of Sihanouk– Even YOU yourself admit it by making the “allowed by Sihanouk” claim. His family is still accepted by the Cambodian people as the Royal Family of Cambodia. So, where is your “legitimate”, and “stable”, viet puppet Cambodian regime today?

    It allows China sponsorship and quietly opposes Vietnam on the South East Asia sea issue, but relationship has not deteriorated like Pol Pot era, nice try to divide and conquer.

    If nam is so nice to Cambodia and the relationship between them is so good, how is it possible for China to “divide and conquer” at all? Maybe, the Cambodians see an example in Champa?!!!

    But do say bring it on, we viets live in peace and do not fear any of you bullies. The moment you invade us is the end of you and all of the “peace and prosperity†bullcrap image you built yourself on.

    Tell the Champas about viets living in peace! The Cambodians are clearly not stupid enough to believe it. They are very serious about viet bullying in the region.

    nam is the one who grabbed the most islets in SCS– and almost ALL of them are in OTHER PEOPLE’s economic zones. In order words, the viets ARE the invaders!!! So, stop the crap that the viets are the most peaceable people in the region.

    We are still waiting to see HOW nam is going to “end” us and our “peace and prosperity”. So, “bring it on”!!!

    But if they invade us, we will help the cambodian people again, so that Cambodia is free of bandits funded by Asian American CIA chinkies. You are welcome.

    If you had followed news at all, you should know that amelika has already invaded you with their warships, all because the nam leaders “allowed” that to happen– something that even Sihanouk did not do with respect to Cambodia. The murikans did not go into nam with guns blazing this time but, if my memory serves me, some murikan sailors are said to have caught Covid 19 after their viet trip. Just wonder how?!

    Mao and Deng are basically just opportunist pigs who join hands with the Great Satan to hurt their neighbors, no difference than the Empire of Japan.

    Mao also joined hands with Uncle Ho. So, Uncle’s nam must be the “Great Satan” that hurt its smaller neighbours!

    Japan tried to conquer China, when the latter was divided and weak, but failed. nam did the same in Cambodia. That is close resemblance in opportunism and empire building.

    China was fully aware of these atrocities, in fact, it and the USA are the two funders who kept the banditry/civil war in Cambodia as well as the clown seat in the UN for the next 10 years after his regime is ousted. China funds him in order to bite Vietnam, and only stops after Vietnam has withdrawn, but now China denies any involvement or knowledge LOL

    Yes, China did but there was no denial. China and the Cambodian nationalists made a deliberate decision to USE the atrocious Pol Pot to oust the viet invaders so that their Kingdom could be restored afterwards. It turned out that it worked according to plan. nam has one Champa fewer and got bitter about it.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Smith
    @Deep Thought

    I'm gonna respond to this guy's first, since he's trying to form the narrative that Vietnam was guilty for "invading" Cambodia, never mind the crazy shit the CIA and chinkies did by supporting Pol Pot.

    Never heard that Sihanouk “allowed†either nam or murrika to invade Cambodian territory.
    �
    He played both sides when he was head of state in the 60s, and yes , he "allowed" it.

    In early 1964, Sihanouk signed a secret agreement with North Vietnam and the Viet Cong, allowing Chinese military aid meant for them to be delivered through Sihanoukville's port. In turn, the Cambodian army would be paid for delivering food supplies to the Viet Cong, and at the same time skim off 10 percent of all military hardware supplies.[93] In addition, he also allowed the Viet Cong to build a trail through eastern Cambodia, so that their troops could receive war supplies from North Vietnam. The trail later became known as the Sihanouk Trail.[94] When the US learned of Viet Cong presence in eastern Cambodia, they started a bombing campaign,[95] spurring Sihanouk to sever diplomatic ties with the US in May 1965.[94] As a result of this secret agreement, Communist countries, including China, the Soviet Union, and Czechoslovakia, provided military aid to Cambodia.[96]
    �

    As relations with China worsened, Sihanouk pursued rapprochement with the US. He learned that Kennedy's widow, Jacqueline Kennedy, had expressed a desire to see Angkor Wat.[111] Seeing this as an opportunity to restore relations with the US, Sihanouk invited her to visit Cambodia and personally hosted her visit in October 1967.[112] Jacqueline Kennedy's visit paved the way for Sihanouk to meet with Chester Bowles, the US ambassador to India. To Bowles, Sihanouk expressed his willingness to restore bilateral relations with the US, hinted at the presence of Viet Cong troops in Cambodia, and suggested he would turn a blind eye should US forces enter Cambodia to attack Viet Cong troops retreating into Cambodia from South Vietnam—a practice known as "hot pursuit"—provided that Cambodians were unharmed.[113][114] Silhanouk told Bowles that he disliked the Vietnamese as a people, saying he had no love for any Vietnamese, red, blue, North or South".[115]
    �
    Sihanouk was pretty much a puppet pushed around, first by the US, and then China. Much like Pol Pot, hell, he was used as a figure to rally for Pol Pot/Khmer Rouge after Khmer Rouge was ousted.

    That also explains why Pol Pot hated both so much. What makes you think that the viets are the only people who is capable of hating their enemies?
    �
    If Pol Pot hated "both" so much, why does he become a CIA bandit and enjoys full western and chink support to kill and destabilize his own people?

    If the puppet regime that the viet built were “stableâ€, it would still be there today for the whole world to see.
    �
    That "regime" is still existing today, with a name change and market liberalization, the ruling party is the Cambodian People Party i.e. Hun Sen's party that was built by Viets post-Pol Pot.

    North Korea is the example of a country “sanctioned by nearly the whole worldâ€â€“ apart from China and a few others– and it is stable and is still around. But that is NOT due to the effort of nam.
    �
    North Korea is Korea divided in half, and North Korea was supported not only by China, but also the rest of the Eastern bloc. Vietnam in Cambodia manages to keep the whole territory and establish a working government that still lasts today DESPITE being sanctioned by most of the world (with the sole exception of the Eastern bloc sans China).

    The legitimate Cambodian government was/is the government of Sihanouk– Even YOU yourself admit it by making the “allowed by Sihanouk†claim.
    �
    No, Sihanouk lost every legitimacy when he supported Pol Pot/Khmer Rouge by China and US's advice, he essentially becomes just another puppet like Puyi or Ming Mang, used by foreign powers to destabilize home country.

    If nam is so nice to Cambodia and the relationship between them is so good, how is it possible for China to “divide and conquer†at all? Maybe, the Cambodians see an example in Champa?!!!
    �
    The same way the US does to any of its enemy, massive amount of propaganda. Cambodia and Vietnam states still enjoy nice relationship, but because post-Vietnam withdrawal, there was surge of US-backed and chink-based ex-Khmer rouge party members back into the government. And no, Cambodia does not see an example in Champa, hell, Pol Pot massacres cham people under his reign.

    Tell the Champas about viets living in peace! The Cambodians are clearly not stupid enough to believe it. They are very serious about viet bullying in the region.
    �
    You can visit Vietnam right now and ask about cham people currently living here. Cambodian under Pol Pot is clearly stupid enough to be receive CIA money and chink guns just to kill his own people and invade Vietnam.

    nam is the one who grabbed the most islets in SCS– and almost ALL of them are in OTHER PEOPLE’s economic zones. In order words, the viets ARE the invaders!!! So, stop the crap that the viets are the most peaceable people in the region.
    �
    No, Vietnam militarization of the islets are a reaction against China's illegal grab of Paracel and the nine-dash-claim. Vietnam has no dispute with other countries, and ASEAN as a whole is united against chink aggression this year.
    https://asiatimes.com/2020/07/asean-stops-pulling-punches-over-south-china-sea/

    If you had followed news at all, you should know that amelika has already invaded you with their warships, all because the nam leaders “allowed†that to happen– something that even Sihanouk did not do with respect to Cambodia.
    �
    Invasion? We allow them in as a gesture of diplomatic dialogue, they do not occupy as and they leave as we tell them to, there’s no foreign base in Vietnam. Funny how chinks cooperate with CIA for over 10 years to fuck over Vietnam and Cambodia, and now they cry foul when another country has diplomatic relation with their rival.

    Mao also joined hands with Uncle Ho. So, Uncle’s nam must be the “Great Satan†that hurt its smaller neighbours!
    �
    Uncle Ho only wanted to liberate Vietnam, Uncle Ho never invaded any of his neighbors, and Vietnam only invades Cambodia after it has massacred vietnamese in Vietnam's territory. Meanwhile, Mao and Deng shakes hands with Nixon and Kissinger, those who bomb both Cambodia and Vietnam, and sustain the banditry that was Pol Pot for over 10 years and worse, invade Vietnam for no reason!

    Japan tried to conquer China, when the latter was divided and weak, but failed. nam did the same in Cambodia. That is close resemblance in opportunism and empire building.
    �
    Vietnam invades Cambodia to stop the attacks by Pol Pot and also provide aids to the Cambodian people, meanwhile, chinks attack Vietnam because it dares going against Pol Pot's banditry, and you talk about opportunism?

    Yes, China did but there was no denial.
    �
    Lies. There's active historical revisionism going around right now, and China refuses to apologize for supporting Pol Pot despite ADMITTING his wrongdoings.

    In December 2000, while Jiang was visiting Cambodia, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China issued a statement that Beijing never supported the wrong policies of Khmer Rouge while it was governing Cambodia and refused to apologize.[166][167][168]
    �
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambodian_genocide#War_crimes_trials
    After this, there is NO point ever in trusting chinks, they are lying through their teeth.

    China and the Cambodian nationalists made a deliberate decision to USE the atrocious Pol Pot to oust the viet invaders so that their Kingdom could be restored afterwards. It turned out that it worked according to plan.
    �
    Again wrong, Pol Pot and Sihanouk were both used to bite Vietnam and prop up banditry, and in the end, they both failed. The government that rules Cambodia now is the government Vietnam establishes, with Hun Sen as the head. Sihanouk is a greedy puppet who himself abdicates in 2004 because he has no power nor support.

    You can keep going, but the more you go, the more criminals you make Mao, Deng and modern China look in the Khmer Rouge period. You essentially were funding ISIS (Khmer Rouge) and Juan Gaido-equivalence (Pol Pot and Sihanouk) to strangehold countries (Cambodia and Vietnam).
  • Smith says:
    @Deep Thought

    That’s a funny to say, since Vietnam only intervenes AFTER the cross-border raids from Pol Pot and the massacre starts, if we have wanted Cambodia territory, we would have started way earlier.
    �
    Very funny indeed. nam was in Cambodia before the Khmer Rouge took power. They could claim revenge against nam-- just like you are claim revenge for border raids, which came afterwards.

    North Vietnam supported the Khmer Rouge at the beginning, since they were also communist revolutionaries, and some of them still are, such as Hun Sen, the current ruler of Cambodia, he was Khmer Rouge too.
    �
    China supported both nam and Cambodia "at the beginning", when both were fighting against foreign invasions-- nam against the Amelikan's, and Cambodia(Khmer Rouge then) against nam's invasions. But China turn against them later because nam became the invader and Khmer Rouge for its genocides against the Cambodians.

    But Pol Pot faction turns into radical anti-vietnamese nationalism, and Vietnam comes to put a stop to it.
    �
    The viets (like you) had/have "turned into radical anti-Chinese nationalism" after China helping them winning the war against the Amerlikans. So, why should you be surprised that China wanted to "put a stop to it" in Cambodia???!!! You must be a believer of Nam Exceptionalism!!!

    Vietnam still stays there 10 years,
    �
    That is about the same length of time the Amelikans stayed in nam. It is no coincidence!!!

    Pol Pot, despite his funding by CIA, chinkies, thai, and all sort of people, still lose in the end.
    That’s a happy ending for such a dark period, where truth and justice are hidden,
    �
    Pol Pot was a loser from the beginning. He was first used by nam and then used by the other side to screwing nam. He had served his purpose well.

    and the good guys (Vietnam and the Cambodian government) were relentlessly attacked by:
    – US, UK, Western bloc
    – China
    – ASEAN, led by the Singapore and Thailand
    �
    The Cambodian government now allies with China and keeps a weary eye on nam.

    Nah, I don’t think so, the only people who enjoy screwing us are evil hegemonies (US and China) and their lackeys (Thailand, Singapore), and in the process of wanting to hurt Vietnam, they end up hurting Cambodia the most. Thorough this period, the USSR and the Eastern bloc still supports us, and we remain steadfast allies.
    �
    "Think" what you want. USSR is no more and Russia, its successor, depends largely on China for it economic wellbeing. The whole of "Eastern block" is full of holes in itself. nam was, and is, useful to them, and Amelka, when they want nam to become their pawn against China. I am sure that nam will fall for it.

    In the modern day, Cambodia turns chink-friendly again, but if they indeed want to turn into Khmer Rouge 2.0, Vietnam welcomes their challenge and history will repeat.
    �
    I modern days, Cambodia sees through the true nature of nam and finds an Asian Amelika in nam. If "the third most powerful military" came again, they would turnCambodia nam's new "Vietnam" again!.

    Replies: @Smith, @Smith

    Very funny indeed. nam was in Cambodia before the Khmer Rouge took power. They could claim revenge against nam– just like you are claim revenge for border raids, which came afterwards.

    So the HCM trail is invasion now? Funny because that was allowed by Sihanouk, who also allows the bombing of Vietnamese, fair is fair. North Vietnam made no push against the government until the outsing of Sihanouk, which allowed Lon Nok to allow South Vietnam in, and the invasion only starts AFTER Pol Pot massacred vietnamese in Vietnam borders.

    The viets (like you) had/have “turned into radical anti-Chinese nationalism†after China helping them winning the war against the Amerlikans. So, why should you be surprised that China wanted to “put a stop to it†in Cambodia???!!! You must be a believer of Nam Exceptionalism!!!

    Where is the radical anti-Chinese nationalism? We see chinks attacking Vietnam territory, funding Pol Pot to raid and invade Vietnam and then raising hell in Cambodia, and now occupying Vietnam sea territories. And yes, it is surprising that chinks decide to team up with USA to fund a bandit like Pol Pot fighting against the legit Cambodian govt, established by Cambodian and Vietnam communists, and join hands with the western pigs and lackeys to sanction both Vietnam and Cambodia. That speaks the level of opportunism, that Mao and Deng are basically just opportunist pigs who join hands with the Great Satan to hurt their neighbors, no difference than the Empire of Japan.

    But China turn against them later because nam became the invader and Khmer Rouge for its genocides against the Cambodians.

    Absolutely false, China was fully aware of these atrocities, in fact, it and the USA are the two funders who kept the banditry/civil war in Cambodia as well as the clown seat in the UN for the next 10 years after his regime is ousted. China funds him in order to bite Vietnam, and only stops after Vietnam has withdrawn, but now China denies any involvement or knowledge LOL

    That is about the same length of time the Amelikans stayed in nam. It is no coincidence!!!

    Lol wut? French stayed in Vietnam for nearly a hundred year, Americans stay in Nam for over 20 years. Meanwhile, Viet pretty much built up the modern and stable Cambodian government in 10 years and get out due to massive crippling sanctions imposed by nearly the whole world (except Eastern Bloc comrades).

    The Cambodian government now allies with China and keeps a weary eye on nam.

    It allows China sponsorship and quietly opposes Vietnam on the South East Asia sea issue, but relationship has not deteriorated like Pol Pot era, nice try to divide and conquer.

    “Think†what you want. USSR is no more and Russia, its successor, depends largely on China for it economic wellbeing. The whole of “Eastern block†is full of holes in itself. nam was, and is, useful to them, and Amelka, when they want nam to become their pawn against China. I am sure that nam will fall for it.

    Ah, the evil imperalist now says his word, he has no trust in his neighbor, this explains his strategy in the South East Asia sea:
    – intentionally keep sea lanes unclear to provoke neighbors
    – cry foul when neighbors start to make dialogue with rival hegemony (despite the fact they themselves have partnered with rival hegemony before hands)
    – prepare invasion plan for neighbor
    Exactly like Pol Pot’s “pre-emptive” strike policy.
    Meanwhile, Vietnam has stayed neutral in this US-China feud (we know the USA cannot be trusted, like chinks), and only pursuits legal attacks against China’s imperialism in the South East Asia sea. But do say bring it on, we viets live in peace and do not fear any of you bullies. The moment you invade us is the end of you and all of the “peace and prosperity” bullcrap image you built yourself on.

    I modern days, Cambodia sees through the true nature of nam and finds an Asian Amelika in nam. If “the third most powerful military†came again, they would turnCambodia nam’s new “Vietnam†again!.

    It is funny because anti-Vietnam sentiment is entirely founded by US-backed parties in Cambodia that massively sponsor propaganda campaigns against Vietnam, so much for “see throughâ€, you are already “Asian amelikaâ€. But if they invade us, we will help the cambodian people again, so that Cambodia is free of bandits funded by Asian American CIA chinkies. You are welcome.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Deep Thought
    @Smith


    So the HCM trail is invasion now? Funny because that was allowed by Sihanouk, who also allows the bombing of Vietnamese, fair is fair.
    �
    Never heard that Sihanouk "allowed" either nam or murrika to invade Cambodian territory. He had no choice because Cambodia was so much weaker than either. That also explains why Pol Pot hated both so much. What makes you think that the viets are the only people who is capable of hating their enemies?

    Viet pretty much built up the modern and stable Cambodian government in 10 years and get out due to massive crippling sanctions imposed by nearly the whole world
    �
    If the puppet regime that the viet built were "stable", it would still be there today for the whole world to see.

    North Korea is the example of a country "sanctioned by nearly the whole world"-- apart from China and a few others-- and it is stable and is still around. But that is NOT due to the effort of nam.

    The legitimate Cambodian government was/is the government of Sihanouk-- Even YOU yourself admit it by making the "allowed by Sihanouk" claim. His family is still accepted by the Cambodian people as the Royal Family of Cambodia. So, where is your "legitimate", and "stable", viet puppet Cambodian regime today?

    It allows China sponsorship and quietly opposes Vietnam on the South East Asia sea issue, but relationship has not deteriorated like Pol Pot era, nice try to divide and conquer.
    �
    If nam is so nice to Cambodia and the relationship between them is so good, how is it possible for China to "divide and conquer" at all? Maybe, the Cambodians see an example in Champa?!!!

    But do say bring it on, we viets live in peace and do not fear any of you bullies. The moment you invade us is the end of you and all of the “peace and prosperity†bullcrap image you built yourself on.
    �
    Tell the Champas about viets living in peace! The Cambodians are clearly not stupid enough to believe it. They are very serious about viet bullying in the region.

    nam is the one who grabbed the most islets in SCS-- and almost ALL of them are in OTHER PEOPLE's economic zones. In order words, the viets ARE the invaders!!! So, stop the crap that the viets are the most peaceable people in the region.

    We are still waiting to see HOW nam is going to "end" us and our "peace and prosperity". So, "bring it on"!!!

    But if they invade us, we will help the cambodian people again, so that Cambodia is free of bandits funded by Asian American CIA chinkies. You are welcome.
    �
    If you had followed news at all, you should know that amelika has already invaded you with their warships, all because the nam leaders "allowed" that to happen-- something that even Sihanouk did not do with respect to Cambodia. The murikans did not go into nam with guns blazing this time but, if my memory serves me, some murikan sailors are said to have caught Covid 19 after their viet trip. Just wonder how?!

    Mao and Deng are basically just opportunist pigs who join hands with the Great Satan to hurt their neighbors, no difference than the Empire of Japan.
    �
    Mao also joined hands with Uncle Ho. So, Uncle's nam must be the "Great Satan" that hurt its smaller neighbours!

    Japan tried to conquer China, when the latter was divided and weak, but failed. nam did the same in Cambodia. That is close resemblance in opportunism and empire building.

    China was fully aware of these atrocities, in fact, it and the USA are the two funders who kept the banditry/civil war in Cambodia as well as the clown seat in the UN for the next 10 years after his regime is ousted. China funds him in order to bite Vietnam, and only stops after Vietnam has withdrawn, but now China denies any involvement or knowledge LOL
    �
    Yes, China did but there was no denial. China and the Cambodian nationalists made a deliberate decision to USE the atrocious Pol Pot to oust the viet invaders so that their Kingdom could be restored afterwards. It turned out that it worked according to plan. nam has one Champa fewer and got bitter about it.

    Replies: @Smith
  • Smith says:
    @Deep Thought

    That’s a funny to say, since Vietnam only intervenes AFTER the cross-border raids from Pol Pot and the massacre starts, if we have wanted Cambodia territory, we would have started way earlier.
    �
    Very funny indeed. nam was in Cambodia before the Khmer Rouge took power. They could claim revenge against nam-- just like you are claim revenge for border raids, which came afterwards.

    North Vietnam supported the Khmer Rouge at the beginning, since they were also communist revolutionaries, and some of them still are, such as Hun Sen, the current ruler of Cambodia, he was Khmer Rouge too.
    �
    China supported both nam and Cambodia "at the beginning", when both were fighting against foreign invasions-- nam against the Amelikan's, and Cambodia(Khmer Rouge then) against nam's invasions. But China turn against them later because nam became the invader and Khmer Rouge for its genocides against the Cambodians.

    But Pol Pot faction turns into radical anti-vietnamese nationalism, and Vietnam comes to put a stop to it.
    �
    The viets (like you) had/have "turned into radical anti-Chinese nationalism" after China helping them winning the war against the Amerlikans. So, why should you be surprised that China wanted to "put a stop to it" in Cambodia???!!! You must be a believer of Nam Exceptionalism!!!

    Vietnam still stays there 10 years,
    �
    That is about the same length of time the Amelikans stayed in nam. It is no coincidence!!!

    Pol Pot, despite his funding by CIA, chinkies, thai, and all sort of people, still lose in the end.
    That’s a happy ending for such a dark period, where truth and justice are hidden,
    �
    Pol Pot was a loser from the beginning. He was first used by nam and then used by the other side to screwing nam. He had served his purpose well.

    and the good guys (Vietnam and the Cambodian government) were relentlessly attacked by:
    – US, UK, Western bloc
    – China
    – ASEAN, led by the Singapore and Thailand
    �
    The Cambodian government now allies with China and keeps a weary eye on nam.

    Nah, I don’t think so, the only people who enjoy screwing us are evil hegemonies (US and China) and their lackeys (Thailand, Singapore), and in the process of wanting to hurt Vietnam, they end up hurting Cambodia the most. Thorough this period, the USSR and the Eastern bloc still supports us, and we remain steadfast allies.
    �
    "Think" what you want. USSR is no more and Russia, its successor, depends largely on China for it economic wellbeing. The whole of "Eastern block" is full of holes in itself. nam was, and is, useful to them, and Amelka, when they want nam to become their pawn against China. I am sure that nam will fall for it.

    In the modern day, Cambodia turns chink-friendly again, but if they indeed want to turn into Khmer Rouge 2.0, Vietnam welcomes their challenge and history will repeat.
    �
    I modern days, Cambodia sees through the true nature of nam and finds an Asian Amelika in nam. If "the third most powerful military" came again, they would turnCambodia nam's new "Vietnam" again!.

    Replies: @Smith, @Smith

    Very funny indeed. nam was in Cambodia before the Khmer Rouge took power. They could claim revenge against nam– just like you are claim revenge for border raids, which came afterwards.

    So the HCM trail is invasion now? Funny because that was allowed by Sihanouk, who also allows the bombing of Vietnamese, fair is fair. North Vietnam made no push against the government until the outsing of Sihanouk, which allowed Lon Nok to allow South Vietnam in, and the invasion only starts AFTER Pol Pot massacred vietnamese in Vietnam borders.

    The viets (like you) had/have “turned into radical anti-Chinese nationalism†after China helping them winning the war against the Amerlikans. So, why should you be surprised that China wanted to “put a stop to it†in Cambodia???!!! You must be a believer of Nam Exceptionalism!!!

    Where is the radical anti-Chinese nationalism? We see chinks attacking Vietnam territory, funding Pol Pot to raid and invade Vietnam and then raising hell in Cambodia, and now occupying Vietnam sea territories. And yes, it is surprising that chinks decide to team up with USA to fund a bandit like Pol Pot fighting against the legit Cambodian govt, established by Cambodian and Vietnam communists, and join hands with the western pigs and lackeys to sanction both Vietnam and Cambodia. That speaks of the level of opportunism, that Mao and Deng are basically just opportunist pigs who join hands with the Great Satan to hurt their neighbors, no difference than the Empire of Japan.

    But China turn against them later because nam became the invader and Khmer Rouge for its genocides against the Cambodians.

    Absolutely false, China was fully aware of these atrocities, in fact, it and the USA are the two funders who kept the banditry/civil war in Cambodia as well as the clown seat in the UN for the next 10 years after his regime is ousted. China funds him in order to bite Vietnam, and only stops after Vietnam has withdrawn, but now China denies any involvement or knowledge LOL

    That is about the same length of time the Amelikans stayed in nam. It is no coincidence!!!

    Lol wut? French stayed in Vietnam for nearly a hundred year, Americans stay in Nam for over 20 years. Meanwhile, Viet pretty much built up the modern and stable Cambodian government in 10 years and get out due to massive crippling sanctions imposed by nearly the whole world (except Eastern Bloc comrades).

    The Cambodian government now allies with China and keeps a weary eye on nam.

    It allows China sponsorship and quietly opposes Vietnam on the South East Asia sea issue, but relationship has not deteriorated like Pol Pot era, nice try to divide and conquer.

    “Think†what you want. USSR is no more and Russia, its successor, depends largely on China for it economic wellbeing. The whole of “Eastern block†is full of holes in itself. nam was, and is, useful to them, and Amelka, when they want nam to become their pawn against China. I am sure that nam will fall for it.

    Ah, the evil imperalist now says his word, he has no trust in his neighbor, this explains his strategy in the South East Asia sea:
    – intentionally keep sea lanes unclear to provoke neighbors
    – cry foul when neighbors start to make dialogue with rival hegemony (despite the fact they themselves have partnered with rival hegemony before hands)
    – prepare invasion plan for neighbor
    Exactly like Pol Pot’s “pre-emptive” strike policy.
    Meanwhile, Vietnam has stayed neutral in this US-China feud (we know the USA cannot be trusted, like chinks), and only pursuits legal attacks against China’s imperialism in the South East Asia sea. But do say bring it on, we viets live in peace and do not fear any of you bullies. The moment you invade us is the end of you and all of the “peace and prosperity” bullcrap image you built yourself on.

    I modern days, Cambodia sees through the true nature of nam and finds an Asian Amelika in nam. If “the third most powerful military†came again, they would turnCambodia nam’s new “Vietnam†again!.

    It is funny because anti-Vietnam sentiment is entirely founded by US-backed parties in Cambodia that massively sponsor propaganda campaigns against Vietnam, so much for “see throughâ€, you are already “Asian amelikaâ€. But if they invade us, we will help the cambodian people again, so that Cambodia is free of bandits funded by Chinese American CIA. You are welcome.

  • That’s a funny to say, since Vietnam only intervenes AFTER the cross-border raids from Pol Pot and the massacre starts, if we have wanted Cambodia territory, we would have started way earlier.

    Very funny indeed. nam was in Cambodia before the Khmer Rouge took power. They could claim revenge against nam– just like you are claim revenge for border raids, which came afterwards.

    North Vietnam supported the Khmer Rouge at the beginning, since they were also communist revolutionaries, and some of them still are, such as Hun Sen, the current ruler of Cambodia, he was Khmer Rouge too.

    China supported both nam and Cambodia “at the beginning”, when both were fighting against foreign invasions– nam against the Amelikan’s, and Cambodia(Khmer Rouge then) against nam’s invasions. But China turn against them later because nam became the invader and Khmer Rouge for its genocides against the Cambodians.

    But Pol Pot faction turns into radical anti-vietnamese nationalism, and Vietnam comes to put a stop to it.

    The viets (like you) had/have “turned into radical anti-Chinese nationalism” after China helping them winning the war against the Amerlikans. So, why should you be surprised that China wanted to “put a stop to it” in Cambodia???!!! You must be a believer of Nam Exceptionalism!!!

    Vietnam still stays there 10 years,

    That is about the same length of time the Amelikans stayed in nam. It is no coincidence!!!

    Pol Pot, despite his funding by CIA, chinkies, thai, and all sort of people, still lose in the end.
    That’s a happy ending for such a dark period, where truth and justice are hidden,

    Pol Pot was a loser from the beginning. He was first used by nam and then used by the other side to screwing nam. He had served his purpose well.

    and the good guys (Vietnam and the Cambodian government) were relentlessly attacked by:
    – US, UK, Western bloc
    – China
    – ASEAN, led by the Singapore and Thailand

    The Cambodian government now allies with China and keeps a weary eye on nam.

    Nah, I don’t think so, the only people who enjoy screwing us are evil hegemonies (US and China) and their lackeys (Thailand, Singapore), and in the process of wanting to hurt Vietnam, they end up hurting Cambodia the most. Thorough this period, the USSR and the Eastern bloc still supports us, and we remain steadfast allies.

    “Think” what you want. USSR is no more and Russia, its successor, depends largely on China for it economic wellbeing. The whole of “Eastern block” is full of holes in itself. nam was, and is, useful to them, and Amelka, when they want nam to become their pawn against China. I am sure that nam will fall for it.

    In the modern day, Cambodia turns chink-friendly again, but if they indeed want to turn into Khmer Rouge 2.0, Vietnam welcomes their challenge and history will repeat.

    I modern days, Cambodia sees through the true nature of nam and finds an Asian Amelika in nam. If “the third most powerful military” came again, they would turnCambodia nam’s new “Vietnam” again!.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Smith
    @Deep Thought


    Very funny indeed. nam was in Cambodia before the Khmer Rouge took power. They could claim revenge against nam– just like you are claim revenge for border raids, which came afterwards.
    �
    So the HCM trail is invasion now? Funny because that was allowed by Sihanouk, who also allows the bombing of Vietnamese, fair is fair. North Vietnam made no push against the government until the outsing of Sihanouk, which allowed Lon Nok to allow South Vietnam in, and the invasion only starts AFTER Pol Pot massacred vietnamese in Vietnam borders.

    The viets (like you) had/have “turned into radical anti-Chinese nationalism†after China helping them winning the war against the Amerlikans. So, why should you be surprised that China wanted to “put a stop to it†in Cambodia???!!! You must be a believer of Nam Exceptionalism!!!
    �
    Where is the radical anti-Chinese nationalism? We see chinks attacking Vietnam territory, funding Pol Pot to raid and invade Vietnam and then raising hell in Cambodia, and now occupying Vietnam sea territories. And yes, it is surprising that chinks decide to team up with USA to fund a bandit like Pol Pot fighting against the legit Cambodian govt, established by Cambodian and Vietnam communists, and join hands with the western pigs and lackeys to sanction both Vietnam and Cambodia. That speaks of the level of opportunism, that Mao and Deng are basically just opportunist pigs who join hands with the Great Satan to hurt their neighbors, no difference than the Empire of Japan.

    But China turn against them later because nam became the invader and Khmer Rouge for its genocides against the Cambodians.
    �
    Absolutely false, China was fully aware of these atrocities, in fact, it and the USA are the two funders who kept the banditry/civil war in Cambodia as well as the clown seat in the UN for the next 10 years after his regime is ousted. China funds him in order to bite Vietnam, and only stops after Vietnam has withdrawn, but now China denies any involvement or knowledge LOL

    That is about the same length of time the Amelikans stayed in nam. It is no coincidence!!!
    �
    Lol wut? French stayed in Vietnam for nearly a hundred year, Americans stay in Nam for over 20 years. Meanwhile, Viet pretty much built up the modern and stable Cambodian government in 10 years and get out due to massive crippling sanctions imposed by nearly the whole world (except Eastern Bloc comrades).

    The Cambodian government now allies with China and keeps a weary eye on nam.
    �
    It allows China sponsorship and quietly opposes Vietnam on the South East Asia sea issue, but relationship has not deteriorated like Pol Pot era, nice try to divide and conquer.

    “Think†what you want. USSR is no more and Russia, its successor, depends largely on China for it economic wellbeing. The whole of “Eastern block†is full of holes in itself. nam was, and is, useful to them, and Amelka, when they want nam to become their pawn against China. I am sure that nam will fall for it.
    �
    Ah, the evil imperalist now says his word, he has no trust in his neighbor, this explains his strategy in the South East Asia sea:
    - intentionally keep sea lanes unclear to provoke neighbors
    - cry foul when neighbors start to make dialogue with rival hegemony (despite the fact they themselves have partnered with rival hegemony before hands)
    - prepare invasion plan for neighbor
    Exactly like Pol Pot's "pre-emptive" strike policy.
    Meanwhile, Vietnam has stayed neutral in this US-China feud (we know the USA cannot be trusted, like chinks), and only pursuits legal attacks against China's imperialism in the South East Asia sea. But do say bring it on, we viets live in peace and do not fear any of you bullies. The moment you invade us is the end of you and all of the "peace and prosperity" bullcrap image you built yourself on.

    I modern days, Cambodia sees through the true nature of nam and finds an Asian Amelika in nam. If “the third most powerful military†came again, they would turnCambodia nam’s new “Vietnam†again!.
    �
    It is funny because anti-Vietnam sentiment is entirely founded by US-backed parties in Cambodia that massively sponsor propaganda campaigns against Vietnam, so much for “see throughâ€, you are already “Asian amelikaâ€. But if they invade us, we will help the cambodian people again, so that Cambodia is free of bandits funded by Chinese American CIA. You are welcome.
    , @Smith
    @Deep Thought


    Very funny indeed. nam was in Cambodia before the Khmer Rouge took power. They could claim revenge against nam– just like you are claim revenge for border raids, which came afterwards.
    �
    So the HCM trail is invasion now? Funny because that was allowed by Sihanouk, who also allows the bombing of Vietnamese, fair is fair. North Vietnam made no push against the government until the outsing of Sihanouk, which allowed Lon Nok to allow South Vietnam in, and the invasion only starts AFTER Pol Pot massacred vietnamese in Vietnam borders.

    The viets (like you) had/have “turned into radical anti-Chinese nationalism†after China helping them winning the war against the Amerlikans. So, why should you be surprised that China wanted to “put a stop to it†in Cambodia???!!! You must be a believer of Nam Exceptionalism!!!
    �
    Where is the radical anti-Chinese nationalism? We see chinks attacking Vietnam territory, funding Pol Pot to raid and invade Vietnam and then raising hell in Cambodia, and now occupying Vietnam sea territories. And yes, it is surprising that chinks decide to team up with USA to fund a bandit like Pol Pot fighting against the legit Cambodian govt, established by Cambodian and Vietnam communists, and join hands with the western pigs and lackeys to sanction both Vietnam and Cambodia. That speaks the level of opportunism, that Mao and Deng are basically just opportunist pigs who join hands with the Great Satan to hurt their neighbors, no difference than the Empire of Japan.

    But China turn against them later because nam became the invader and Khmer Rouge for its genocides against the Cambodians.
    �
    Absolutely false, China was fully aware of these atrocities, in fact, it and the USA are the two funders who kept the banditry/civil war in Cambodia as well as the clown seat in the UN for the next 10 years after his regime is ousted. China funds him in order to bite Vietnam, and only stops after Vietnam has withdrawn, but now China denies any involvement or knowledge LOL

    That is about the same length of time the Amelikans stayed in nam. It is no coincidence!!!
    �
    Lol wut? French stayed in Vietnam for nearly a hundred year, Americans stay in Nam for over 20 years. Meanwhile, Viet pretty much built up the modern and stable Cambodian government in 10 years and get out due to massive crippling sanctions imposed by nearly the whole world (except Eastern Bloc comrades).

    The Cambodian government now allies with China and keeps a weary eye on nam.
    �
    It allows China sponsorship and quietly opposes Vietnam on the South East Asia sea issue, but relationship has not deteriorated like Pol Pot era, nice try to divide and conquer.

    “Think†what you want. USSR is no more and Russia, its successor, depends largely on China for it economic wellbeing. The whole of “Eastern block†is full of holes in itself. nam was, and is, useful to them, and Amelka, when they want nam to become their pawn against China. I am sure that nam will fall for it.
    �
    Ah, the evil imperalist now says his word, he has no trust in his neighbor, this explains his strategy in the South East Asia sea:
    - intentionally keep sea lanes unclear to provoke neighbors
    - cry foul when neighbors start to make dialogue with rival hegemony (despite the fact they themselves have partnered with rival hegemony before hands)
    - prepare invasion plan for neighbor
    Exactly like Pol Pot's "pre-emptive" strike policy.
    Meanwhile, Vietnam has stayed neutral in this US-China feud (we know the USA cannot be trusted, like chinks), and only pursuits legal attacks against China's imperialism in the South East Asia sea. But do say bring it on, we viets live in peace and do not fear any of you bullies. The moment you invade us is the end of you and all of the "peace and prosperity" bullcrap image you built yourself on.

    I modern days, Cambodia sees through the true nature of nam and finds an Asian Amelika in nam. If “the third most powerful military†came again, they would turnCambodia nam’s new “Vietnam†again!.
    �
    It is funny because anti-Vietnam sentiment is entirely founded by US-backed parties in Cambodia that massively sponsor propaganda campaigns against Vietnam, so much for “see throughâ€, you are already “Asian amelikaâ€. But if they invade us, we will help the cambodian people again, so that Cambodia is free of bandits funded by Asian American CIA chinkies. You are welcome.

    Replies: @Deep Thought
  • @Philip Owen
    @Munga Bulga

    Neither the East India Company nor the British government was involved in the opium trade to China. The EIC grew very high quality opium in Bengal for sale to the British market. Britain had a laudnam problem of it's own. The opium in China was sold by Bengali merchants (it was called the country trade) as it had been for at least 1000 years - since about 800 AD. It was lower quality or occasionally EIC excess stock.

    The Chinese burnt the opium against British objections to be sure but that was part of the bigger picture of rebellion in China against the Qing. Bengali opium was naturally stored in one of the British warehouses. The first opium war was not about opium. It was about the rights of the Bengali traders (British subjects) to enjoy free trade and by extension other foreign traders. The significance of the opium is a leftist reconstruction to fit a tale of helpless Chinese without agency of their own. The silver shortage is another myth. The US and the Spanish Empire were producing plenty. The rent for Penang, for example, was agreed in Spanish silver dollars. Individual Bengali merchants were short of silver but that was not the reason for selling opium.

    Replies: @Munga Bulga

    This is what I was talking about.
    This is why Brexit failed and you will get raped by the EU for real this time. The pakis and indians will make breeding pens from your “women”. Go to hell.

  • @Deep Thought

    Awww, I meant “theyâ€, not just the americans, but you too, chink friends, why didn’t you stay and celebrate with us when we depose Pot Pot and liberate the Cambodian people? I guess we were just too “ungratefulâ€.
    �
    I knew what you meant but you did NOT know that you had unwittingly included nam TOO!!! Nam saw/sees Cambodia just as another Champa that they wanted to swallow-- feathers and bones.

    And I’m a native Vietnamese born and raised, I have a neutral view towards both the US and China, who are our biggest enemies in history, and especially when they join hands to fuck Vietnam in the past, particularly during the Pol Pot episode (Pol Pot was funded by the CIA and given weapons by chinkies).
    �

    China's favourite in the 1960's was Prince Sihanouk. China only gave support to the Khmer Rouge AFTER the CIA plot that overthrew Sihanouk and installed the Lon Nol regime. Sihanouk became China's favourite AGAIN after nam met its OWN "Vietnam" in Cambodia!!! Following China's withdrawal of support-- after nam tucked tail-- the Khmer Rouge went into decline.
    .

    "Under Prince Sihanouk, Cambodia had preserved neutrality during the Vietnamese civil war by giving a little to both sides: Vietnamese communists were allowed to use a Cambodian port to ship in supplies, the USA were allowed to bomb - secretly and illegitimately - Viet Cong hideouts in Cambodia. When US-backed Lon Nol took over, US troops felt free to move into Cambodia to continue their struggle with the Viet Cong."
    �
    .
    So, Sihanouk managed to keep Cambodia neutral by enjoying a little rape by BOTH the US and North nam. It was only when the US wanted to monopolize the rape of Cambodia that things got out of hand.
    .
    The viets were the real agent that made Pol Pot:
    .

    1968
    In 1968, the Khmer Rouge was officially formed and its forces launched a national insurgency across Cambodia. Though North Vietnam had not been informed of the decision, its forces provided shelter and weapons to the Khmer Rouge after the insurgency started.

    Khmer Rouge - Wikipedia
    �
    .
    And their initial relations with Pol Pot were more intimate than China's and they later saw the Khmer Rouge turned against them. If the CIA had learnt its lesson from the latter, it would not have help create the Talaban. ;-D, ;-D, ;-D
    .
    So you see, everyone enjoys screwing nam and the viets. That is because nam and the viets are so ungrateful to the big guys and so atrocious towards the smaller guys (e.g. Champa, Cambodia)!!!

    Replies: @Smith

    I knew what you meant but you did NOT know that you had unwittingly included nam TOO!!! Nam saw/sees Cambodia just as another Champa that they wanted to swallow– feathers and bones.

    That’s a funny to say, since Vietnam only intervenes AFTER the cross-border raids from Pol Pot and the massacre starts, if we have wanted Cambodia territory, we would have started way earlier.

    The viets were the real agent that made Pol Pot:

    North Vietnam supported the Khmer Rouge at the beginning, since they were also communist revolutionaries, and some of them still are, such as Hun Sen, the current ruler of Cambodia, he was Khmer Rouge too.
    But Pol Pot faction turns into radical anti-vietnamese nationalism, and Vietnam comes to put a stop to it.
    What COMES after the ousting of Pol Pot regime is where the CIA and chinks support come in:

    Zbigniew Brzezinski “himself claims that he concocted the idea of persuading Thailand to cooperate fully with China in its efforts to rebuild the Khmer Rouge.†Brzezinski said, “I encouraged the Chinese to support Pol Pot. I encouraged the Thai to help the D.K. [Khmer Rouge government-in-exile of Democratic Kampuchea]. The question was how to help the Cambodian people. Pol Pot was an abomination. We could never support him, but China could.†In fact, U.S. support went well beyond encouraging others to rebuild the Khmer Rouge.
    In neighboring Thailand, the Khmer Rouge formed a large guerrilla army, while Cambodian politician Son Sann established an army that would be ultimately named the Khmer People’s National Liberation Front (KPNLF). Prince Norodom Sihanouk launched his private army, the Armée Nationale Sihanoukiste (ANS).
    On the political front, in 1979 the United States and China wielded their influence and pushed through a vote in the UN General Assembly in favor of granting Cambodia’s UN seat to the ousted Khmer Rouge regime, and terminated a UN investigation into Khmer Rouge crimes. The following year, the United States again supported the Khmer Rouge in the UN as the “legitimate†representative of the Cambodian people. With U.S. backing, Cambodia would continue to be represented in the United Nations by a Khmer Rouge diplomat until 1993.

    https://www.counterpunch.org/2014/10/16/who-supported-the-khmer-rouge/
    Vietnam still stays there 10 years, to build up a Cambodian government, with a new army, and leaves after that is finished. Pol Pot, despite his funding by CIA, chinkies, thai, and all sort of people, still lose in the end.
    That’s a happy ending for such a dark period, where truth and justice are hidden, and the good guys (Vietnam and the Cambodian government) were relentlessly attacked by:
    – US, UK, Western bloc
    – China
    – ASEAN, led by the Singapore and Thailand

    So you see, everyone enjoys screwing nam and the viets. That is because nam and the viets are so ungrateful to the big guys and so atrocious towards the smaller guys (e.g. Champa, Cambodia)!!!

    Nah, I don’t think so, the only people who enjoy screwing us are evil hegemonies (US and China) and their lackeys (Thailand, Singapore), and in the process of wanting to hurt Vietnam, they end up hurting Cambodia the most. Thorough this period, the USSR and the Eastern bloc still supports us, and we remain steadfast allies.
    In the modern day, Cambodia turns chink-friendly again, but if they indeed want to turn into Khmer Rouge 2.0, Vietnam welcomes their challenge and history will repeat.

    @ HeebHunter

    That’s quite a charge. Might I ask for evidences, officer?

    @ Brian Damage

    Yeah nah, there is only about 1 million Hoa people in Saigon/HCMC. Vietnam, even South Vietnam only, has more “business owners and professionals” than that.

  • @Anatoly Karlin
    @Mr. XYZ

    Immigration from the high IQ Asian countries is rapidly drying up. https://cis.org/Report/Immigrant-Population-Growth-Slows

    https://cis.org/sites/default/files/2020-10/camarota-imm-pop-2020-t2.jpg

    Annatar from another thread:

    From 2010-17, number of Chinese immigrants grew from 2.167m to 2.844m, only rose to 2.854m by 2019, no growth
    Number of Russian immigrants declined from 404,000 to 392,000

    Replies: @A123, @Mr. XYZ

    To be fair, though, the US had Trump as President between 2017 and right now, so that might be a factor in the slowdown of high-IQ Asian immigration to the US. I wonder if under a President Biden we’ll once again see a huge increase in the Chinese-American immigrant population just like we did under President Obama; after all, both Obama and Biden are *relatively* pro-immigration.

    Also, even from low-IQ Asian countries such as India, the US still sometimes gets high-IQ immigrants or at least descendants of immigrants; for instance, from India. This could yet continue for quite a while, especially if the US will continue to have pro-immigration Presidents in office. Of course, if the US will ever REALLY open its borders to immigrants from places such as India, then I suspect that the Indian-American population might on average eventually end up looking much more like the British Indian population; so, for instance, an average IQ in the mid- or high-90s (AFAIK, British-born British Indians have an average IQ of 96-97) as opposed to having an average IQ of ~110.

  • @Munga Bulga
    @Philip Owen

    I wanted to give a proper reply but seeing that the anglo will never repent for anything...
    Opium War.
    "B-b-but those goddamn chinks refused to trade in anything but our funny money"
    "Muh tea, muh porclain"

    Fucking island monkeys.

    Replies: @Philip Owen

    Neither the East India Company nor the British government was involved in the opium trade to China. The EIC grew very high quality opium in Bengal for sale to the British market. Britain had a laudnam problem of it’s own. The opium in China was sold by Bengali merchants (it was called the country trade) as it had been for at least 1000 years – since about 800 AD. It was lower quality or occasionally EIC excess stock.

    The Chinese burnt the opium against British objections to be sure but that was part of the bigger picture of rebellion in China against the Qing. Bengali opium was naturally stored in one of the British warehouses. The first opium war was not about opium. It was about the rights of the Bengali traders (British subjects) to enjoy free trade and by extension other foreign traders. The significance of the opium is a leftist reconstruction to fit a tale of helpless Chinese without agency of their own. The silver shortage is another myth. The US and the Spanish Empire were producing plenty. The rent for Penang, for example, was agreed in Spanish silver dollars. Individual Bengali merchants were short of silver but that was not the reason for selling opium.

    •ï¿½Troll: d dan, Munga Bulga
    •ï¿½Replies: @Munga Bulga
    @Philip Owen

    This is what I was talking about.
    This is why Brexit failed and you will get raped by the EU for real this time. The pakis and indians will make breeding pens from your "women". Go to hell.
  • @Munga Bulga
    @Deep Thought

    He is likely one of those boat people remnants who were rightfully chased out of Vietnam after the war for being colaborators for the colonial powers.
    For all the hate against those damn chinks, he forgot the Southern provinces of Vietnam below the equator line has always been full of Chinese migrants called the Hoa people.

    Hell, one of the pop singer back in 2000s Vietnam had Chinese family name and the trademark slant eye, and they all loved her.

    I suspect "Smith" is one of those misguided soul, content to see another proxy war waged on his ancestral soil, just so he can have second class treatment by his fellow amerimutts who will always see him as a chink, evident during the Covid-19 racial attacks.

    Replies: @Brian Damage

    I have not been to Northern Vietnam/Hanoi or Mid-Vietnam/DaNang so I can only speak about South Vietnam. Seems like most of the people that own business or professionals are Hans or mestizo Hans. Ho Chi Minh’s boom is related to this.

  • Awww, I meant “theyâ€, not just the americans, but you too, chink friends, why didn’t you stay and celebrate with us when we depose Pot Pot and liberate the Cambodian people? I guess we were just too “ungratefulâ€.

    I knew what you meant but you did NOT know that you had unwittingly included nam TOO!!! Nam saw/sees Cambodia just as another Champa that they wanted to swallow– feathers and bones.

    And I’m a native Vietnamese born and raised, I have a neutral view towards both the US and China, who are our biggest enemies in history, and especially when they join hands to fuck Vietnam in the past, particularly during the Pol Pot episode (Pol Pot was funded by the CIA and given weapons by chinkies).

    [MORE]

    China’s favourite in the 1960’s was Prince Sihanouk. China only gave support to the Khmer Rouge AFTER the CIA plot that overthrew Sihanouk and installed the Lon Nol regime. Sihanouk became China’s favourite AGAIN after nam met its OWN “Vietnam” in Cambodia!!! Following China’s withdrawal of support– after nam tucked tail– the Khmer Rouge went into decline.
    .

    “Under Prince Sihanouk, Cambodia had preserved neutrality during the Vietnamese civil war by giving a little to both sides: Vietnamese communists were allowed to use a Cambodian port to ship in supplies, the USA were allowed to bomb – secretly and illegitimately – Viet Cong hideouts in Cambodia. When US-backed Lon Nol took over, US troops felt free to move into Cambodia to continue their struggle with the Viet Cong.”

    .
    So, Sihanouk managed to keep Cambodia neutral by enjoying a little rape by BOTH the US and North nam. It was only when the US wanted to monopolize the rape of Cambodia that things got out of hand.
    .
    The viets were the real agent that made Pol Pot:
    .

    1968
    In 1968, the Khmer Rouge was officially formed and its forces launched a national insurgency across Cambodia. Though North Vietnam had not been informed of the decision, its forces provided shelter and weapons to the Khmer Rouge after the insurgency started.

    Khmer Rouge – Wikipedia

    .
    And their initial relations with Pol Pot were more intimate than China’s and they later saw the Khmer Rouge turned against them. If the CIA had learnt its lesson from the latter, it would not have help create the Talaban. ;-D, ;-D, ;-D
    .
    So you see, everyone enjoys screwing nam and the viets. That is because nam and the viets are so ungrateful to the big guys and so atrocious towards the smaller guys (e.g. Champa, Cambodia)!!!

    •ï¿½Replies: @Smith
    @Deep Thought


    I knew what you meant but you did NOT know that you had unwittingly included nam TOO!!! Nam saw/sees Cambodia just as another Champa that they wanted to swallow– feathers and bones.
    �
    That’s a funny to say, since Vietnam only intervenes AFTER the cross-border raids from Pol Pot and the massacre starts, if we have wanted Cambodia territory, we would have started way earlier.

    The viets were the real agent that made Pol Pot:
    �
    North Vietnam supported the Khmer Rouge at the beginning, since they were also communist revolutionaries, and some of them still are, such as Hun Sen, the current ruler of Cambodia, he was Khmer Rouge too.
    But Pol Pot faction turns into radical anti-vietnamese nationalism, and Vietnam comes to put a stop to it.
    What COMES after the ousting of Pol Pot regime is where the CIA and chinks support come in:

    Zbigniew Brzezinski “himself claims that he concocted the idea of persuading Thailand to cooperate fully with China in its efforts to rebuild the Khmer Rouge.†Brzezinski said, “I encouraged the Chinese to support Pol Pot. I encouraged the Thai to help the D.K. [Khmer Rouge government-in-exile of Democratic Kampuchea]. The question was how to help the Cambodian people. Pol Pot was an abomination. We could never support him, but China could.†In fact, U.S. support went well beyond encouraging others to rebuild the Khmer Rouge.
    In neighboring Thailand, the Khmer Rouge formed a large guerrilla army, while Cambodian politician Son Sann established an army that would be ultimately named the Khmer People’s National Liberation Front (KPNLF). Prince Norodom Sihanouk launched his private army, the Armée Nationale Sihanoukiste (ANS).
    On the political front, in 1979 the United States and China wielded their influence and pushed through a vote in the UN General Assembly in favor of granting Cambodia’s UN seat to the ousted Khmer Rouge regime, and terminated a UN investigation into Khmer Rouge crimes. The following year, the United States again supported the Khmer Rouge in the UN as the “legitimate†representative of the Cambodian people. With U.S. backing, Cambodia would continue to be represented in the United Nations by a Khmer Rouge diplomat until 1993.
    �
    https://www.counterpunch.org/2014/10/16/who-supported-the-khmer-rouge/
    Vietnam still stays there 10 years, to build up a Cambodian government, with a new army, and leaves after that is finished. Pol Pot, despite his funding by CIA, chinkies, thai, and all sort of people, still lose in the end.
    That’s a happy ending for such a dark period, where truth and justice are hidden, and the good guys (Vietnam and the Cambodian government) were relentlessly attacked by:
    - US, UK, Western bloc
    - China
    - ASEAN, led by the Singapore and Thailand

    So you see, everyone enjoys screwing nam and the viets. That is because nam and the viets are so ungrateful to the big guys and so atrocious towards the smaller guys (e.g. Champa, Cambodia)!!!
    �
    Nah, I don’t think so, the only people who enjoy screwing us are evil hegemonies (US and China) and their lackeys (Thailand, Singapore), and in the process of wanting to hurt Vietnam, they end up hurting Cambodia the most. Thorough this period, the USSR and the Eastern bloc still supports us, and we remain steadfast allies.
    In the modern day, Cambodia turns chink-friendly again, but if they indeed want to turn into Khmer Rouge 2.0, Vietnam welcomes their challenge and history will repeat.

    @ HeebHunter

    That's quite a charge. Might I ask for evidences, officer?

    @ Brian Damage

    Yeah nah, there is only about 1 million Hoa people in Saigon/HCMC. Vietnam, even South Vietnam only, has more "business owners and professionals" than that.
  • @Smith
    @Deep Thought

    Awww, I meant "they", not just the americans, but you too, chink friends, why didn't you stay and celebrate with us when we depose Pot Pot and liberate the Cambodian people? I guess we were just too “ungratefulâ€.

    Oh wait, didn't your govt say it didn't support the regime's wrongdoings?

    In December 2000, while Jiang was visiting Cambodia, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China issued a statement that Beijing never supported the wrong policies of Khmer Rouge while it was governing Cambodia and refused to apologize.[166][167][168] Yang Yanyi (æ¨ç‡•æ€¡), then the Deputy Director of the Asian Department in the Foreign Ministry of China, claimed that:[166]
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambodian_genocide#War_crimes_trials

    This is an internal affair to be addressed by the Cambodians themselves. China had never interfered in the internal affairs of another country. Our assistance and support during that certain historical period was to support Cambodia's effort to safeguard its sovereignty and national independence. We never support wrong policies of other countries.
    �
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambodian_genocide#War_crimes_trials

    So it seems one of you lied then.

    On a more serious note, Vietnam back in 1975, just fresh off the war with the americans, then marching into Kampuchea to remove Pol Pot, while fending off chink attack on the North AND under America's sanctions. The fact weviets did it all back then was fucking marvelous, like outta a movie.

    Too bad there are no big screen depictions of these campaigns, Vietnam still has to develop more.

    And I'm a native Vietnamese born and raised, I have a neutral view towards both the US and China, who are our biggest enemies in history, and especially when they join hands to fuck Vietnam in the past, particularly during the Pol Pot episode (Pol Pot was funded by the CIA and given weapons by chinkies).

    @ HeebHunter

    Sad to see you say that, oh well, anyone is anti-chink nowadays is considered to be mutt friend, and vice versa. Such 2D thinking, you have to bow before a foreign power in order to fight another one. Uncle Ho taught viets that "we cannot invite the leopard to fight the tiger" like in 40s politics where Phan Boi Chau thought calling the japs over would free us of the french (while the japs would just rule us instead). Very similar thinking is being placed here in the 20s, where the "nationalist" chinks are gonna liberate the whole world for everyone, while we non-actors just sing and clap.

    And no, I don't forget the Hoa people. The Hoa people are basically like the jews here, they blend in and become rich merchant, capitalizing all the assets, and of course vote for pro-chink policies including selling land to China, that's why there are purges of Hoa people in Vietnam before they dominate Vietnam's politics and economy. But it's weird to see you suddenly defend the jews equivalence in Asia, I guess Hitler was wrong then when trying to make an ethnostate and excluding the jews from owning business LOL.

    Vietnam will just keep walking its own path to defend its national interests, along with ASEAN. Kowtowing to hegemony isn’t on Vietnam’s traditions.

    Replies: @Munga Bulga

    Dear “smith”, we actually have records of commenting history here.
    I suggest you drop your job as a mutt propagandist before it is too late.

  • @Philip Owen
    @d dan

    Britain did not set out to colonize anywhere in Asia. The East India Company was there to trade not conquer. Pay tribute or be conquered was the Chinese threat. A land lord extracting rent. The Chinese court originally assumed the British were there to pay tribute too.

    Most places, most of the time the British ended up defending their trading posts and trading partners from the greed of a nearby neighbour.

    Replies: @Munga Bulga

    I wanted to give a proper reply but seeing that the anglo will never repent for anything…
    Opium War.
    “B-b-but those goddamn chinks refused to trade in anything but our funny money”
    “Muh tea, muh porclain”

    Fucking island monkeys.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Philip Owen
    @Munga Bulga

    Neither the East India Company nor the British government was involved in the opium trade to China. The EIC grew very high quality opium in Bengal for sale to the British market. Britain had a laudnam problem of it's own. The opium in China was sold by Bengali merchants (it was called the country trade) as it had been for at least 1000 years - since about 800 AD. It was lower quality or occasionally EIC excess stock.

    The Chinese burnt the opium against British objections to be sure but that was part of the bigger picture of rebellion in China against the Qing. Bengali opium was naturally stored in one of the British warehouses. The first opium war was not about opium. It was about the rights of the Bengali traders (British subjects) to enjoy free trade and by extension other foreign traders. The significance of the opium is a leftist reconstruction to fit a tale of helpless Chinese without agency of their own. The silver shortage is another myth. The US and the Spanish Empire were producing plenty. The rent for Penang, for example, was agreed in Spanish silver dollars. Individual Bengali merchants were short of silver but that was not the reason for selling opium.

    Replies: @Munga Bulga
  • Smith says:
    @Deep Thought
    @Smith

    The Chinese have every reason to feeling hurt by those people who are famous for being ungrateful:

    Chinese Support for North Vietnam during the Vietnam War: The Decisive Edge
    by Bob Seals

    '“Thus the highest realization of warfare is to attack the enemy plans;†according to the learned military theorist Sun-Tzu in the Art of War. [69] In respects this is exactly what the North Vietnamese, and Chinese did in both Vietnam Wars: they successfully attacked the Western powers war plans. The considerable support for the DRV by the PRC, to include a promise to intervene with massive numbers of troops in the event of an invasion of North Vietnam, effectively eliminated this course of action, and perhaps others, as potential war winning options for the West. Thus, with the support of China, on a strategic level of war the DRV was able to remain upon the offensive throughout the war, maintaining the initiative and finally achieving victory as Saigon fell in April of 1975.'

    http://www.militaryhistoryonline.com/20thcentury/articles/chinesesupport.aspx

    Not just the Chinese who think the viets are ungrateful. I remember having read decades ago that the GI's thought so too. Maybe, this is a reference to it:

    'This is a war of the unwilling led by the unqualified, dying for the ungrateful'

    https://books.google.com.hk/books?id=_10wDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT173&lpg=PT173&dq=GI%27s+said+vietnamese+are+ungrateful&source=bl&ots=w3ybYsv5r1&sig=ACfU3U3tbL7J16ghQqLhHLxxVS42zQxO4w&hl=zh-TW&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjUkZXrn6LtAhXDyYsBHa9nB-oQ6AEwEHoECAkQAg#v=onepage&q=GI's%20said%20vietnamese%20are%20ungrateful&f=false

    Replies: @Smith, @Smith

    Awww, I meant “they”, not just the americans, but you too, chink friends, why didn’t you stay and celebrate with us when we depose Pot Pot and liberate the Cambodian people? I guess we were just too “ungratefulâ€.

    Oh wait, didn’t your govt say it didn’t support the regime’s wrongdoings?

    In December 2000, while Jiang was visiting Cambodia, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China issued a statement that Beijing never supported the wrong policies of Khmer Rouge while it was governing Cambodia and refused to apologize.[166][167][168] Yang Yanyi (æ¨ç‡•æ€¡), then the Deputy Director of the Asian Department in the Foreign Ministry of China, claimed that:[166]
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambodian_genocide#War_crimes_trials

    This is an internal affair to be addressed by the Cambodians themselves. China had never interfered in the internal affairs of another country. Our assistance and support during that certain historical period was to support Cambodia’s effort to safeguard its sovereignty and national independence. We never support wrong policies of other countries.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambodian_genocide#War_crimes_trials

    So it seems one of you lied then.

    On a more serious note, Vietnam back in 1975, just fresh off the war with the americans, then marching into Kampuchea to remove Pol Pot, while fending off chink attack on the North AND under America’s sanctions. The fact weviets did it all back then was fucking marvelous, like outta a movie.

    Too bad there are no big screen depictions of these campaigns, Vietnam still has to develop more.

    And I’m a native Vietnamese born and raised, I have a neutral view towards both the US and China, who are our biggest enemies in history, and especially when they join hands to fuck Vietnam in the past, particularly during the Pol Pot episode (Pol Pot was funded by the CIA and given weapons by chinkies).

    @ HeebHunter

    Sad to see you say that, oh well, anyone is anti-chink nowadays is considered to be mutt friend, and vice versa. Such 2D thinking, you have to bow before a foreign power in order to fight another one. Uncle Ho taught viets that “we cannot invite the leopard to fight the tiger” like in 40s politics where Phan Boi Chau thought calling the japs over would free us of the french (while the japs would just rule us instead). Very similar thinking is being placed here in the 20s, where the “nationalist” chinks are gonna liberate the whole world for everyone, while we non-actors just sing and clap.

    And no, I don’t forget the Hoa people. The Hoa people are basically like the jews here, they blend in and become rich merchant, capitalizing all the assets, and of course vote for pro-chink policies including selling land to China, that’s why there are purges of Hoa people in Vietnam before they dominate Vietnam’s politics and economy. But it’s weird to see you suddenly defend the jews equivalence in Asia, I guess Hitler was wrong then when trying to make an ethnostate and excluding the jews from owning business LOL.

    Vietnam will just keep walking its own path to defend its national interests, along with ASEAN. Kowtowing to hegemony isn’t on Vietnam’s traditions.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Munga Bulga
    @Smith

    Dear "smith", we actually have records of commenting history here.
    I suggest you drop your job as a mutt propagandist before it is too late.
  • @Munga Bulga
    @Brian Damage

    Who wanna bet the next great Führer will be in China?

    Replies: @Brian Damage

    Nah, it will never happen. Han nationalism is different. Right now, Han nationalism is more of a threat to the CCP than the world.

  • @d dan
    @Philip Owen


    "The British were invited. The Sultan of Kedah wanted support against his enemies. "
    �
    So was Zheng He. But unlike the British, Portuguese, French or Dutch, Zheng He did not try to colonize any of the tiny kingdoms, nor capitalize on the conflicts among them. The few big military operations he did was to help the Palembang defeated a 5000-men strong Chinese pirate group led by Chen Zuyi 陈祖义. By that time, there were already big Chinese diaspora who were friendly to the Ming, including many militarily superior Chinese forces/friendly kingdoms, so Zheng He could easily set up many colonies if he or the Ming emperor wanted. Instead, Zheng He concentrated his missions to almost exclusive peaceful purposes. He presented gifts of gold, silver, porcelain, and silk to the locals, and in return, received novelties such as ostriches, zebras, camels, and ivory. He built temples, mosque and monuments, brought foreign diplomats to China, developed relations between China and Islamic countries. For example, in 1961, the Indonesian Islamic leader and scholar Hamka credited Zheng He for playing an important role in the development of Islam in Indonesia.

    Zheng He's fleet was delicious - it is still making so many Whites and half Whites angry after 600 years. What is little known is that China actually has a long history of extensive seafaring and overseas trades and activities, dating back to the Han dynasty 2000 years ago. For example, during the Three Kingdoms Period, the king of Wu sent a 20-year diplomatic mission led by Zhu Ying and Kang Tai along the coast of Asia, which reached as far as the Eastern Roman Empire. By Song dynasty, 200 years before Zheng He, Chinese already established a large networks of commercial trade outposts, interests and settlements throughout the South East Asia and India Ocean. There were also joint anti-pirate activities with local kingdom and even European forces.

    Ref: Deng, Gang (2005). Chinese Maritime Activities and Socioeconomic Development, c. 2100 BC – 1900 AD. Greenwood Press.

    Replies: @d dan, @Philip Owen, @showmethereal

    Britain did not set out to colonize anywhere in Asia. The East India Company was there to trade not conquer. Pay tribute or be conquered was the Chinese threat. A land lord extracting rent. The Chinese court originally assumed the British were there to pay tribute too.

    Most places, most of the time the British ended up defending their trading posts and trading partners from the greed of a nearby neighbour.

    •ï¿½LOL: Munga Bulga
    •ï¿½Troll: d dan
    •ï¿½Replies: @Munga Bulga
    @Philip Owen

    I wanted to give a proper reply but seeing that the anglo will never repent for anything...
    Opium War.
    "B-b-but those goddamn chinks refused to trade in anything but our funny money"
    "Muh tea, muh porclain"

    Fucking island monkeys.

    Replies: @Philip Owen
  • @Brian Damage
    @Daniel Chieh

    The main problem but also a blessing is China's leadership. It is shaped by a bunch of stiff engineers who looked for solutions in inorganic ways. Effective but cold.

    It is a blessing because bypassing redtapes and consensus, these engineers were able to tackle complex problems facing China immediately. The enormous growth of the past few decades can be attributed to this.

    It is a problem because as China's economy matures, it naturally will compete with higher value added economies like the US and that's when soft power, a great multiplier comes into play. Having these engineers and their engineer subordinates to coordinate some kind of a soft power offensive is like having a math nerd with zero social skills trying tell others how to get girls.

    I feel China has reached a point where it has to recruit artists into its leadership. By artist, I meant people who are creative visionaries.

    As a country progress, it must be organic, cohesive and strategic. Sort of like Japan but in a Chinese way.

    Replies: @Munga Bulga, @Astuteobservor II

    Who wanna bet the next great Führer will be in China?

    •ï¿½Replies: @Brian Damage
    @Munga Bulga

    Nah, it will never happen. Han nationalism is different. Right now, Han nationalism is more of a threat to the CCP than the world.
  • Munga Bulga [AKA "HeebHunter"] says:
    @Deep Thought
    @Smith

    Yes, they left-- thanks to China's promise to intervene. Many viets left with them and and became their colonial subjects. You are probably among them.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-do-many-overseas-Vietnamese-people-ungrateful-of-Ho-Chi-Minhs-effort-of-re-uniting-their-country-and-prefer-to-have-been-a-colony-of-America

    So, you see, viets are ungrateful even to other viets!!!.

    Empires have no friends indeed-- Just ask the Khmer Rouge who made Cambodia vietnam's OWN "Vietnam"!!! ;-D, ;-D, ;-D Again, China was the main supporter in the fight against viet empire building. Again, that fight was successful!

    Replies: @Munga Bulga

    He is likely one of those boat people remnants who were rightfully chased out of Vietnam after the war for being colaborators for the colonial powers.
    For all the hate against those damn chinks, he forgot the Southern provinces of Vietnam below the equator line has always been full of Chinese migrants called the Hoa people.

    Hell, one of the pop singer back in 2000s Vietnam had Chinese family name and the trademark slant eye, and they all loved her.

    I suspect “Smith” is one of those misguided soul, content to see another proxy war waged on his ancestral soil, just so he can have second class treatment by his fellow amerimutts who will always see him as a chink, evident during the Covid-19 racial attacks.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Brian Damage
    @Munga Bulga

    I have not been to Northern Vietnam/Hanoi or Mid-Vietnam/DaNang so I can only speak about South Vietnam. Seems like most of the people that own business or professionals are Hans or mestizo Hans. Ho Chi Minh's boom is related to this.
  • @Astuteobservor II
    @Smith

    And you direct the conversation towards this in every fucking article on china.

    That is trolling. Almost on a professional level.

    I read almost every article about china on unz. The tail end of every comments section has your retarded comments steering the conversation to China vs Vietnam.

    Every single one.

    Please kindly stfu about it. No one gives a fuck about Vietnam geopolitically or economically. Or how China has wronged your country. Most of it are incoherent babble.

    Get fucking over it. Show the Chinese you are better by making your country better. You need to learn from thulean friend on how to attack China.

    Replies: @Brian Damage, @Munga Bulga

    This kind of “nationalist” was/is a product of dysgenic colonial training.
    They are everywhere. Nowadays only North Korea, China, Iran and to some degree, god forbids, russia, can be considered true nationalists. The rests are just peasants, occupied cucks and useful idiots.

  • @Smith
    @Deep Thought

    Haha, I guess they felt so ungrateful they left Vietnam post haste. Bye bye.

    Ho Chi Minh was right, national security matter should never be left to foreigner, whether be chinks, japs or americans. Empires have no friends.

    Replies: @Deep Thought

    Yes, they left– thanks to China’s promise to intervene. Many viets left with them and and became their colonial subjects. You are probably among them.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-do-many-overseas-Vietnamese-people-ungrateful-of-Ho-Chi-Minhs-effort-of-re-uniting-their-country-and-prefer-to-have-been-a-colony-of-America

    So, you see, viets are ungrateful even to other viets!!!.

    Empires have no friends indeed– Just ask the Khmer Rouge who made Cambodia vietnam’s OWN “Vietnam”!!! ;-D, ;-D, ;-D Again, China was the main supporter in the fight against viet empire building. Again, that fight was successful!

    •ï¿½Replies: @Munga Bulga
    @Deep Thought

    He is likely one of those boat people remnants who were rightfully chased out of Vietnam after the war for being colaborators for the colonial powers.
    For all the hate against those damn chinks, he forgot the Southern provinces of Vietnam below the equator line has always been full of Chinese migrants called the Hoa people.

    Hell, one of the pop singer back in 2000s Vietnam had Chinese family name and the trademark slant eye, and they all loved her.

    I suspect "Smith" is one of those misguided soul, content to see another proxy war waged on his ancestral soil, just so he can have second class treatment by his fellow amerimutts who will always see him as a chink, evident during the Covid-19 racial attacks.

    Replies: @Brian Damage
  • @Deep Thought
    @Smith

    The Chinese have every reason to feeling hurt by those people who are famous for being ungrateful:

    Chinese Support for North Vietnam during the Vietnam War: The Decisive Edge
    by Bob Seals

    '“Thus the highest realization of warfare is to attack the enemy plans;†according to the learned military theorist Sun-Tzu in the Art of War. [69] In respects this is exactly what the North Vietnamese, and Chinese did in both Vietnam Wars: they successfully attacked the Western powers war plans. The considerable support for the DRV by the PRC, to include a promise to intervene with massive numbers of troops in the event of an invasion of North Vietnam, effectively eliminated this course of action, and perhaps others, as potential war winning options for the West. Thus, with the support of China, on a strategic level of war the DRV was able to remain upon the offensive throughout the war, maintaining the initiative and finally achieving victory as Saigon fell in April of 1975.'

    http://www.militaryhistoryonline.com/20thcentury/articles/chinesesupport.aspx

    Not just the Chinese who think the viets are ungrateful. I remember having read decades ago that the GI's thought so too. Maybe, this is a reference to it:

    'This is a war of the unwilling led by the unqualified, dying for the ungrateful'

    https://books.google.com.hk/books?id=_10wDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT173&lpg=PT173&dq=GI%27s+said+vietnamese+are+ungrateful&source=bl&ots=w3ybYsv5r1&sig=ACfU3U3tbL7J16ghQqLhHLxxVS42zQxO4w&hl=zh-TW&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjUkZXrn6LtAhXDyYsBHa9nB-oQ6AEwEHoECAkQAg#v=onepage&q=GI's%20said%20vietnamese%20are%20ungrateful&f=false

    Replies: @Smith, @Smith

    Haha, I guess they felt so ungrateful they left Vietnam post haste. Bye bye.

    Ho Chi Minh was right, national security matter should never be left to foreigner, whether be chinks, japs or americans. Empires have no friends.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Deep Thought
    @Smith

    Yes, they left-- thanks to China's promise to intervene. Many viets left with them and and became their colonial subjects. You are probably among them.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-do-many-overseas-Vietnamese-people-ungrateful-of-Ho-Chi-Minhs-effort-of-re-uniting-their-country-and-prefer-to-have-been-a-colony-of-America

    So, you see, viets are ungrateful even to other viets!!!.

    Empires have no friends indeed-- Just ask the Khmer Rouge who made Cambodia vietnam's OWN "Vietnam"!!! ;-D, ;-D, ;-D Again, China was the main supporter in the fight against viet empire building. Again, that fight was successful!

    Replies: @Munga Bulga
  • @Smith
    @Deep Thought

    & @ Astuteobservor II

    This must be famous “hurt feelings of the chinese people".

    I'm sorry, my chink friends, for your hurt feelings, but talking and discussion of China history in a topic about China isn't off-topic.

    @ d dan

    One question: is there any proof that Zheng He could "easily" set up colonies in these nations if he "tried" to?

    That's a funny thing to assume, because the Ming indeed put troops in Vietnam and were beaten back by Le Loi’s army who were tribesmen at the times. And Vietnam shares a land border with Ming China.

    The chinks love to play up Zheng He's fleets, but their actual military accomplishment in foreign land shows a different reality.

    I fear that after American exceptionalism, Chinese exceptionalism will be the next thing, where the talking point would be WE CHAYNESE COULDA CONQUA DA WHOLE WORLD WE JUST CHOSE NOT TO, and history repeats itself.

    Replies: @Deep Thought, @Astuteobservor II, @Philip Owen

    The Chinese have every reason to feeling hurt by those people who are famous for being ungrateful:

    Chinese Support for North Vietnam during the Vietnam War: The Decisive Edge
    by Bob Seals

    ‘“Thus the highest realization of warfare is to attack the enemy plans;†according to the learned military theorist Sun-Tzu in the Art of War. [69] In respects this is exactly what the North Vietnamese, and Chinese did in both Vietnam Wars: they successfully attacked the Western powers war plans. The considerable support for the DRV by the PRC, to include a promise to intervene with massive numbers of troops in the event of an invasion of North Vietnam, effectively eliminated this course of action, and perhaps others, as potential war winning options for the West. Thus, with the support of China, on a strategic level of war the DRV was able to remain upon the offensive throughout the war, maintaining the initiative and finally achieving victory as Saigon fell in April of 1975.’

    http://www.militaryhistoryonline.com/20thcentury/articles/chinesesupport.aspx

    Not just the Chinese who think the viets are ungrateful. I remember having read decades ago that the GI’s thought so too. Maybe, this is a reference to it:

    ‘This is a war of the unwilling led by the unqualified, dying for the ungrateful

    https://books.google.com.hk/books?id=_10wDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT173&lpg=PT173&dq=GI%27s+said+vietnamese+are+ungrateful&source=bl&ots=w3ybYsv5r1&sig=ACfU3U3tbL7J16ghQqLhHLxxVS42zQxO4w&hl=zh-TW&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjUkZXrn6LtAhXDyYsBHa9nB-oQ6AEwEHoECAkQAg#v=onepage&q=GI’s%20said%20vietnamese%20are%20ungrateful&f=false

    •ï¿½Replies: @Smith
    @Deep Thought

    Haha, I guess they felt so ungrateful they left Vietnam post haste. Bye bye.

    Ho Chi Minh was right, national security matter should never be left to foreigner, whether be chinks, japs or americans. Empires have no friends.

    Replies: @Deep Thought
    , @Smith
    @Deep Thought

    Awww, I meant "they", not just the americans, but you too, chink friends, why didn't you stay and celebrate with us when we depose Pot Pot and liberate the Cambodian people? I guess we were just too “ungratefulâ€.

    Oh wait, didn't your govt say it didn't support the regime's wrongdoings?

    In December 2000, while Jiang was visiting Cambodia, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China issued a statement that Beijing never supported the wrong policies of Khmer Rouge while it was governing Cambodia and refused to apologize.[166][167][168] Yang Yanyi (æ¨ç‡•æ€¡), then the Deputy Director of the Asian Department in the Foreign Ministry of China, claimed that:[166]
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambodian_genocide#War_crimes_trials

    This is an internal affair to be addressed by the Cambodians themselves. China had never interfered in the internal affairs of another country. Our assistance and support during that certain historical period was to support Cambodia's effort to safeguard its sovereignty and national independence. We never support wrong policies of other countries.
    �
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambodian_genocide#War_crimes_trials

    So it seems one of you lied then.

    On a more serious note, Vietnam back in 1975, just fresh off the war with the americans, then marching into Kampuchea to remove Pol Pot, while fending off chink attack on the North AND under America's sanctions. The fact weviets did it all back then was fucking marvelous, like outta a movie.

    Too bad there are no big screen depictions of these campaigns, Vietnam still has to develop more.

    And I'm a native Vietnamese born and raised, I have a neutral view towards both the US and China, who are our biggest enemies in history, and especially when they join hands to fuck Vietnam in the past, particularly during the Pol Pot episode (Pol Pot was funded by the CIA and given weapons by chinkies).

    @ HeebHunter

    Sad to see you say that, oh well, anyone is anti-chink nowadays is considered to be mutt friend, and vice versa. Such 2D thinking, you have to bow before a foreign power in order to fight another one. Uncle Ho taught viets that "we cannot invite the leopard to fight the tiger" like in 40s politics where Phan Boi Chau thought calling the japs over would free us of the french (while the japs would just rule us instead). Very similar thinking is being placed here in the 20s, where the "nationalist" chinks are gonna liberate the whole world for everyone, while we non-actors just sing and clap.

    And no, I don't forget the Hoa people. The Hoa people are basically like the jews here, they blend in and become rich merchant, capitalizing all the assets, and of course vote for pro-chink policies including selling land to China, that's why there are purges of Hoa people in Vietnam before they dominate Vietnam's politics and economy. But it's weird to see you suddenly defend the jews equivalence in Asia, I guess Hitler was wrong then when trying to make an ethnostate and excluding the jews from owning business LOL.

    Vietnam will just keep walking its own path to defend its national interests, along with ASEAN. Kowtowing to hegemony isn’t on Vietnam’s traditions.

    Replies: @Munga Bulga
  • Smith says:
    @Deep Thought
    @Smith


    The chinks who go on to attack me and Vietnam just show how insecure they are regarding history.
    �
    YOU are the one "who goes on to attack Chinese and China" non-stop on this forum. The Chinese posters are merely RESPONDING to your mad assaults.

    If China/Chinese really are as bad as you claim, then you are merely admitting that nam/viets are just small versions of China/Chinese– from intellectual ability to chauvinist attitude, from body size to penis size– which, of course, is the chauvinist Chinese’s view about nam/viets, and which is also the view the viets resent the MOST!!!
    .
    If you were a real viet, WHY are you working so hard to propagate a narrative that the viets hate so much???!!!

    Replies: @Smith

    & @ Astuteobservor II

    This must be famous “hurt feelings of the chinese people”.

    I’m sorry, my chink friends, for your hurt feelings, but talking and discussion of China history in a topic about China isn’t off-topic.

    @ d dan

    One question: is there any proof that Zheng He could “easily” set up colonies in these nations if he “tried” to?

    That’s a funny thing to assume, because the Ming indeed put troops in Vietnam and were beaten back by Le Loi’s army who were tribesmen at the times. And Vietnam shares a land border with Ming China.

    The chinks love to play up Zheng He’s fleets, but their actual military accomplishment in foreign land shows a different reality.

    I fear that after American exceptionalism, Chinese exceptionalism will be the next thing, where the talking point would be WE CHAYNESE COULDA CONQUA DA WHOLE WORLD WE JUST CHOSE NOT TO, and history repeats itself.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Deep Thought
    @Smith

    The Chinese have every reason to feeling hurt by those people who are famous for being ungrateful:

    Chinese Support for North Vietnam during the Vietnam War: The Decisive Edge
    by Bob Seals

    '“Thus the highest realization of warfare is to attack the enemy plans;†according to the learned military theorist Sun-Tzu in the Art of War. [69] In respects this is exactly what the North Vietnamese, and Chinese did in both Vietnam Wars: they successfully attacked the Western powers war plans. The considerable support for the DRV by the PRC, to include a promise to intervene with massive numbers of troops in the event of an invasion of North Vietnam, effectively eliminated this course of action, and perhaps others, as potential war winning options for the West. Thus, with the support of China, on a strategic level of war the DRV was able to remain upon the offensive throughout the war, maintaining the initiative and finally achieving victory as Saigon fell in April of 1975.'

    http://www.militaryhistoryonline.com/20thcentury/articles/chinesesupport.aspx

    Not just the Chinese who think the viets are ungrateful. I remember having read decades ago that the GI's thought so too. Maybe, this is a reference to it:

    'This is a war of the unwilling led by the unqualified, dying for the ungrateful'

    https://books.google.com.hk/books?id=_10wDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT173&lpg=PT173&dq=GI%27s+said+vietnamese+are+ungrateful&source=bl&ots=w3ybYsv5r1&sig=ACfU3U3tbL7J16ghQqLhHLxxVS42zQxO4w&hl=zh-TW&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjUkZXrn6LtAhXDyYsBHa9nB-oQ6AEwEHoECAkQAg#v=onepage&q=GI's%20said%20vietnamese%20are%20ungrateful&f=false

    Replies: @Smith, @Smith
    , @Astuteobservor II
    @Smith

    I can't speak for other anons, so I won't.

    The fact that you think I am Chinese just proved every single one of my points in my comments in replies to you.

    Are you even vietnamese? Do you know what is good for Vietnam? Do you understand what is bad for Vietnam?

    I sincerely hope there are vietnamese smarter than you.
    , @Philip Owen
    @Smith

    It's not as if the Europeans, other than the New World Spanish and Imperial Russia, set out to conquer new lands until the Scramble for Africa. They went to trade not conquer. The Dutch and the French were rather robust at times. The Portugese, Danes and the British less so. Local actors got greedy. That was a big mistake.

    Replies: @Smith
  • @Deep Thought
    @Brian Damage


    They are very similar to the Khmer nationalists of Cambodia.
    �
    Whom are these Khmer nationalists against? I hope it isn't the hated Chinese again!!! China supports the Kingdom of Cambodia AND the Khmer Rouge in their fights against outsiders and for their their independence.

    Replies: @Brian Damage

    These Khmer nationalists hate Vietnam and everyone else like the @smith hates China. The Khmer Rouge was a casualty of a proxy war between China and Russia’s client Vietnam which resulted in many deaths so there is nothing to celebrate about.

    These nationalists were loud and everywhere during the 80s and 90s but as Prime Minister for life
    Hun Sen solidifies his power, things got quiet.

  • @Daniel Chieh
    @Showmethereal

    Your argument is incoherent on multiple levels.

    1. Someone who played Ninja Gaiden enough to actually form parts of his identity from it will identify with the main character and sympathize to formerly foreign names and ideas. He will find the ideas of ninjas, demons and the outlines of the story to be cool. He will associate his happiness while playing with these formerly foreign aspects such as Japanese words. He will likely find girls in yukatas sexy.

    He doesn't need to want to be a ninja. The impact of soft power is enough in that it builds a sense of familiarity.

    If for some reason someday he ever needs to make a decision on something Chinese vs Japanese, our video game player has a now unconscious basis of positive feelings for Japanese.

    2. You are incorrect on popularity. Japanese themed games, almost surprisingly, smash record sales.

    https://gamingbolt.com/sekiro-shadows-die-twice-tops-media-create-charts-with-almost-160k-copies-sold

    Sekiro: Shadows Die Twice is now the developer’s second title to reach “No. 1 in All Formats†in the UK, with the first being Dark Souls 3, which released in 2016.

    �
    The UK is part of the West. Dark Souls 3 was ALSO another Japanese game from the same studio. But even if you were correct, Call of Duty runs on PlayStation, which is Japanese.

    3. Nonsequitor of origin of Japanese style is meaningless. It doesn't matter where ninjitsu comes from. It doesn't matter where flour from bread comes from, the consumer only experiences the end product and makes associations on the bread with the store and brand he purchased. In fact, if China has the same base qualities but is unable to make it marketable, it just shows the Chinese as being additionally incapable.

    Fortunately, like I said, the more successful Chinese soft power generators like miohiyo are ignoring your line of thinking. It is a concern if your line of thinking is common, though, because its immeasurably wrong and fundamentally poor for soft power. China has been horrible at the latter. She needs to get over herself and learn from those who do it better.

    Replies: @Brian Damage, @showmethereal

    The main problem but also a blessing is China’s leadership. It is shaped by a bunch of stiff engineers who looked for solutions in inorganic ways. Effective but cold.

    It is a blessing because bypassing redtapes and consensus, these engineers were able to tackle complex problems facing China immediately. The enormous growth of the past few decades can be attributed to this.

    It is a problem because as China’s economy matures, it naturally will compete with higher value added economies like the US and that’s when soft power, a great multiplier comes into play. Having these engineers and their engineer subordinates to coordinate some kind of a soft power offensive is like having a math nerd with zero social skills trying tell others how to get girls.

    I feel China has reached a point where it has to recruit artists into its leadership. By artist, I meant people who are creative visionaries.

    As a country progress, it must be organic, cohesive and strategic. Sort of like Japan but in a Chinese way.

    •ï¿½Agree: Daniel Chieh, Munga Bulga
    •ï¿½Replies: @Munga Bulga
    @Brian Damage

    Who wanna bet the next great Führer will be in China?

    Replies: @Brian Damage
    , @Astuteobservor II
    @Brian Damage

    I am sorry, but anyone who espouses soft power over hard power would be really brain damaged.

    The American military budget should slap you silly.

    The Chinese around 1900 would probably kill you on sight for saying something so stupid.

    The America today would not exist.

    Saddam is crawling out of his grave to strangle you with the rope that hanged him.

    Soft power comes naturally with hard power. With money. With status.

    Telling the chinese to forsake hard power to pursue soft power is the same as telling them to commit suicide.

    Replies: @Brian Damage
  • @Brian Damage
    @Astuteobservor II

    I have encountered people like @smith online for decades. They are very similar to the Khmer nationalists of Cambodia. Both angry and bitter about something that is not related to their own predicament.

    I was just in Ho Chi Minh city 2 years ago. So much potential. The young people there are full of optimism and they can feel growth is coming. The city is friendly and safe. I ventured to the countryside, and it is the same. Feels like Bangkok in the 1980s, about ready to go boom.

    Then again we got people like @smith. These losers are the ones that caused Vietnam to stay poor and not grow. They keep projecting their own inferiority complex onto unrelated external factors. China is always the easiest target because it doesn't give a sh*t about image and projects its soft power like a nerd trying to breakdance.

    Replies: @Deep Thought

    They are very similar to the Khmer nationalists of Cambodia.

    Whom are these Khmer nationalists against? I hope it isn’t the hated Chinese again!!! China supports the Kingdom of Cambodia AND the Khmer Rouge in their fights against outsiders and for their their independence.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Brian Damage
    @Deep Thought

    These Khmer nationalists hate Vietnam and everyone else like the @smith hates China. The Khmer Rouge was a casualty of a proxy war between China and Russia's client Vietnam which resulted in many deaths so there is nothing to celebrate about.

    These nationalists were loud and everywhere during the 80s and 90s but as Prime Minister for life
    Hun Sen solidifies his power, things got quiet.
  • @Astuteobservor II
    @Smith

    And you direct the conversation towards this in every fucking article on china.

    That is trolling. Almost on a professional level.

    I read almost every article about china on unz. The tail end of every comments section has your retarded comments steering the conversation to China vs Vietnam.

    Every single one.

    Please kindly stfu about it. No one gives a fuck about Vietnam geopolitically or economically. Or how China has wronged your country. Most of it are incoherent babble.

    Get fucking over it. Show the Chinese you are better by making your country better. You need to learn from thulean friend on how to attack China.

    Replies: @Brian Damage, @Munga Bulga

    I have encountered people like @smith online for decades. They are very similar to the Khmer nationalists of Cambodia. Both angry and bitter about something that is not related to their own predicament.

    I was just in Ho Chi Minh city 2 years ago. So much potential. The young people there are full of optimism and they can feel growth is coming. The city is friendly and safe. I ventured to the countryside, and it is the same. Feels like Bangkok in the 1980s, about ready to go boom.

    Then again we got people like @smith. These losers are the ones that caused Vietnam to stay poor and not grow. They keep projecting their own inferiority complex onto unrelated external factors. China is always the easiest target because it doesn’t give a sh*t about image and projects its soft power like a nerd trying to breakdance.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Deep Thought
    @Brian Damage


    They are very similar to the Khmer nationalists of Cambodia.
    �
    Whom are these Khmer nationalists against? I hope it isn't the hated Chinese again!!! China supports the Kingdom of Cambodia AND the Khmer Rouge in their fights against outsiders and for their their independence.

    Replies: @Brian Damage
  • @d dan
    @Philip Owen


    "The British were invited. The Sultan of Kedah wanted support against his enemies. "
    �
    So was Zheng He. But unlike the British, Portuguese, French or Dutch, Zheng He did not try to colonize any of the tiny kingdoms, nor capitalize on the conflicts among them. The few big military operations he did was to help the Palembang defeated a 5000-men strong Chinese pirate group led by Chen Zuyi 陈祖义. By that time, there were already big Chinese diaspora who were friendly to the Ming, including many militarily superior Chinese forces/friendly kingdoms, so Zheng He could easily set up many colonies if he or the Ming emperor wanted. Instead, Zheng He concentrated his missions to almost exclusive peaceful purposes. He presented gifts of gold, silver, porcelain, and silk to the locals, and in return, received novelties such as ostriches, zebras, camels, and ivory. He built temples, mosque and monuments, brought foreign diplomats to China, developed relations between China and Islamic countries. For example, in 1961, the Indonesian Islamic leader and scholar Hamka credited Zheng He for playing an important role in the development of Islam in Indonesia.

    Zheng He's fleet was delicious - it is still making so many Whites and half Whites angry after 600 years. What is little known is that China actually has a long history of extensive seafaring and overseas trades and activities, dating back to the Han dynasty 2000 years ago. For example, during the Three Kingdoms Period, the king of Wu sent a 20-year diplomatic mission led by Zhu Ying and Kang Tai along the coast of Asia, which reached as far as the Eastern Roman Empire. By Song dynasty, 200 years before Zheng He, Chinese already established a large networks of commercial trade outposts, interests and settlements throughout the South East Asia and India Ocean. There were also joint anti-pirate activities with local kingdom and even European forces.

    Ref: Deng, Gang (2005). Chinese Maritime Activities and Socioeconomic Development, c. 2100 BC – 1900 AD. Greenwood Press.

    Replies: @d dan, @Philip Owen, @showmethereal

    Further note: see the 1987 discovered Song dynasty maritime silk road ship called “å—海一å·â€. It was considered one of the biggest archeological finding of the recent time:

    https://bkimg.cdn.bcebos.com/pic/960a304e251f95cab763e37ec7177f3e66095267

  • d dan says:
    @Philip Owen
    @d dan

    The British were invited. The Sultan of Kedah wanted support against his enemies. 200 arrived at Georgetown.

    Replies: @d dan

    “The British were invited. The Sultan of Kedah wanted support against his enemies. ”

    So was Zheng He. But unlike the British, Portuguese, French or Dutch, Zheng He did not try to colonize any of the tiny kingdoms, nor capitalize on the conflicts among them. The few big military operations he did was to help the Palembang defeated a 5000-men strong Chinese pirate group led by Chen Zuyi 陈祖义. By that time, there were already big Chinese diaspora who were friendly to the Ming, including many militarily superior Chinese forces/friendly kingdoms, so Zheng He could easily set up many colonies if he or the Ming emperor wanted. Instead, Zheng He concentrated his missions to almost exclusive peaceful purposes. He presented gifts of gold, silver, porcelain, and silk to the locals, and in return, received novelties such as ostriches, zebras, camels, and ivory. He built temples, mosque and monuments, brought foreign diplomats to China, developed relations between China and Islamic countries. For example, in 1961, the Indonesian Islamic leader and scholar Hamka credited Zheng He for playing an important role in the development of Islam in Indonesia.

    Zheng He’s fleet was delicious – it is still making so many Whites and half Whites angry after 600 years. What is little known is that China actually has a long history of extensive seafaring and overseas trades and activities, dating back to the Han dynasty 2000 years ago. For example, during the Three Kingdoms Period, the king of Wu sent a 20-year diplomatic mission led by Zhu Ying and Kang Tai along the coast of Asia, which reached as far as the Eastern Roman Empire. By Song dynasty, 200 years before Zheng He, Chinese already established a large networks of commercial trade outposts, interests and settlements throughout the South East Asia and India Ocean. There were also joint anti-pirate activities with local kingdom and even European forces.

    Ref: Deng, Gang (2005). Chinese Maritime Activities and Socioeconomic Development, c. 2100 BC – 1900 AD. Greenwood Press.

    •ï¿½Thanks: Munga Bulga
    •ï¿½Replies: @d dan
    @d dan

    Further note: see the 1987 discovered Song dynasty maritime silk road ship called “å—海一å·â€. It was considered one of the biggest archeological finding of the recent time:

    https://bkimg.cdn.bcebos.com/pic/960a304e251f95cab763e37ec7177f3e66095267
    , @Philip Owen
    @d dan

    Britain did not set out to colonize anywhere in Asia. The East India Company was there to trade not conquer. Pay tribute or be conquered was the Chinese threat. A land lord extracting rent. The Chinese court originally assumed the British were there to pay tribute too.

    Most places, most of the time the British ended up defending their trading posts and trading partners from the greed of a nearby neighbour.

    Replies: @Munga Bulga
    , @showmethereal
    @d dan

    Correct... Little in the west is known about Chinese seafaring innovation over the centuries. And since this is about GDP - they should not be shocked at how China has come to have the largest ship industry in the world now. They can say what they want about Xi - but he is absolutely clear that China needed to go back to the sea to not repeat the error of the Ming and the Qing in retreating and ignoring. China set about building a maritime militia and fishing fleet - the largest in the world before building up the navy. In the same way they are not doing it colonize others like the 5 Eyes claims.
  • @d dan
    @Deep Thought


    "If they are right, it shows that the Chinese CAN colonise and thereby proves that you are spitting out crap."
    �
    It took British only a few hundred people to colonize Malaya, even fewer for Singapore. But hey, Zheng He probably could not spare that amount of people, according to that stupid troll.

    Replies: @Philip Owen

    The British were invited. The Sultan of Kedah wanted support against his enemies. 200 arrived at Georgetown.

    •ï¿½Replies: @d dan
    @Philip Owen


    "The British were invited. The Sultan of Kedah wanted support against his enemies. "
    �
    So was Zheng He. But unlike the British, Portuguese, French or Dutch, Zheng He did not try to colonize any of the tiny kingdoms, nor capitalize on the conflicts among them. The few big military operations he did was to help the Palembang defeated a 5000-men strong Chinese pirate group led by Chen Zuyi 陈祖义. By that time, there were already big Chinese diaspora who were friendly to the Ming, including many militarily superior Chinese forces/friendly kingdoms, so Zheng He could easily set up many colonies if he or the Ming emperor wanted. Instead, Zheng He concentrated his missions to almost exclusive peaceful purposes. He presented gifts of gold, silver, porcelain, and silk to the locals, and in return, received novelties such as ostriches, zebras, camels, and ivory. He built temples, mosque and monuments, brought foreign diplomats to China, developed relations between China and Islamic countries. For example, in 1961, the Indonesian Islamic leader and scholar Hamka credited Zheng He for playing an important role in the development of Islam in Indonesia.

    Zheng He's fleet was delicious - it is still making so many Whites and half Whites angry after 600 years. What is little known is that China actually has a long history of extensive seafaring and overseas trades and activities, dating back to the Han dynasty 2000 years ago. For example, during the Three Kingdoms Period, the king of Wu sent a 20-year diplomatic mission led by Zhu Ying and Kang Tai along the coast of Asia, which reached as far as the Eastern Roman Empire. By Song dynasty, 200 years before Zheng He, Chinese already established a large networks of commercial trade outposts, interests and settlements throughout the South East Asia and India Ocean. There were also joint anti-pirate activities with local kingdom and even European forces.

    Ref: Deng, Gang (2005). Chinese Maritime Activities and Socioeconomic Development, c. 2100 BC – 1900 AD. Greenwood Press.

    Replies: @d dan, @Philip Owen, @showmethereal
  • @Ron Unz
    @Rdm


    Have you ever heard of Han Chinese destroying foreign national treasure? You’ve heard Chinese are sneaky, devious, unscrupulous but Europeans are so benevolent and kind-hearted that there’s no mention of the Summer Palace destroyed by British and French in MSM.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Summer_Palace

    ...On one hand, you have no historical events of Han Chinese destroying foreign treasures in foreign lands in thousands of years.
    �
    Well, I'm not sure that's entirely fair. After all, for the last couple of thousand years China had controlled nearly all the civilized regions in its vicinity, so its (border) wars were mostly fought against steppe barbarians. When victorious, the Chinese might massacre them, but they probably didn't have any "foreign treasures" worth destroying.

    On the other hand, consider the case of the (very harsh) first emperor, who established the Chinese Empire. Didn't he supposedly destroy an enormous number of ancient books and documents and massacre huge numbers of scholars in order to "culturally unify" his new state by stamping out preexisting regional languages and ideas?

    Throughout history, countries that fought each other have not infrequently burned down and destroyed the capital cities of their enemies, and if China had had rival powers in its part of the world, I expect it would have done the same. I'm not an expert on Chinese history, but didn't this sort of thing sometimes happen during the various civil wars or earlier, in the Warring States period?

    Replies: @JohnnyWalker123, @Daniel Chieh, @Rdm, @Philip Owen

    The whole reason to burn down the Summer Palace was to carry out a bloodless, more or less, humiliation of the Emperor rather than fight an actual war. It was not a consequence of war, it was an alternative. It worked. Significant bloodshed was avoided.

  • @Ron Unz
    The recent Pepe Escobar thread about the RECP agreement contained a provocative comment, beginning with the following couple of paragraphs:

    If you take a broad view then it appears that the world is being divided into two major blocs–the Chinese bloc and the Israeli bloc. I don’t say ‘American’ because it is Israel that makes the decisions and the groups need to be named after their respective leaders.

    All countries in the world have already joined one of these two sides, or will have to make up their minds soon.
    �
    https://www.unz.com/pescobar/rcep-set-to-supercharge-the-new-silk-roads/#comment-4298610

    Although I tend to disagree with elements of his analysis, it's probably closer to reality than what you get in the NYT/WSJ.

    One reason I doubt such global bloc-formation is that I think the competence and stability of the West in general and America in particular is declining at such a rapid rate even just a few years may be enough to totally invalidate such predictions.

    Meanwhile, it's sad to see The Economist go entirely insane. Their current cover apparently endorses the new Cold War against China, with their lead editorial seeming to argue that launching it was one of the very few things Trump did right. Their first few sentences:

    The achievement of the Trump administration was to recognise the authoritarian threat from China. The task of the Biden administration will be to work out what to do about it.

    Donald Trump’s instinct was for America to run this fight single-handed. Old allies were henchmen, not partners. As Joe Biden prepares his China strategy (see article) he should choose a different path.
    �
    https://www.economist.com/leaders/2020/11/19/the-china-strategy-america-needs

    I've been a subscriber for over 40 years, going back when their total circulation was under 50K, and given the mortality tables, probably longer than 99.9% of their current readers and almost all of their current staff. I stopped reading their issues after they supported the crazy Iraq War in 2002, but I still never would have believed that they'd get on Trump's China Cold War bandwagon. The whole situation with the Western MSM really is very disheartening.

    https://www.unz.com/runz/the-long-decline-of-the-london-economist/

    Replies: @Eugene Norman, @Lake Wobegon, @Philip Owen

    I cancelled my subscription in 1985. The Economist used to be a tutorial in economic theory. It became much more newsy and foreign affairs partly to chase the US market and partly because international trade was improving. They have wandered far from technical political economy since.

  • @Smith
    @Astuteobservor II

    I wanted to post some angry replies, but then again, I think I have danced this dance too many times. I want to clarify that we were discussing the capacity of Ming chinks colonization during Zheng He times, Vietnam is just a part of the argument.

    There were chink shills who believe that during Ming era, they ruled the world, and only spared the world from chink colonization due to their oh so peaceful culture, I smash their delusion by pointing out weakness of the Ming during the times, and how they cannot go on naval expansion/colonization as the whiteys did.

    The chinks who go on to attack me and Vietnam just show how insecure they are regarding history.

    I have already discussed the topic of GDP above, and I agree with A. Karlin that China will massively expand their GDP during the upcoming years. This is due to the economic model used, and has less to do with traditional chink culture or Han genetic or whatsoever.

    My only other point is with singy chink, and his disbelief in Japan soft power vs the current chink soft power.

    Replies: @Deep Thought, @Astuteobservor II

    And you direct the conversation towards this in every fucking article on china.

    That is trolling. Almost on a professional level.

    I read almost every article about china on unz. The tail end of every comments section has your retarded comments steering the conversation to China vs Vietnam.

    Every single one.

    Please kindly stfu about it. No one gives a fuck about Vietnam geopolitically or economically. Or how China has wronged your country. Most of it are incoherent babble.

    Get fucking over it. Show the Chinese you are better by making your country better. You need to learn from thulean friend on how to attack China.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Brian Damage
    @Astuteobservor II

    I have encountered people like @smith online for decades. They are very similar to the Khmer nationalists of Cambodia. Both angry and bitter about something that is not related to their own predicament.

    I was just in Ho Chi Minh city 2 years ago. So much potential. The young people there are full of optimism and they can feel growth is coming. The city is friendly and safe. I ventured to the countryside, and it is the same. Feels like Bangkok in the 1980s, about ready to go boom.

    Then again we got people like @smith. These losers are the ones that caused Vietnam to stay poor and not grow. They keep projecting their own inferiority complex onto unrelated external factors. China is always the easiest target because it doesn't give a sh*t about image and projects its soft power like a nerd trying to breakdance.

    Replies: @Deep Thought
    , @Munga Bulga
    @Astuteobservor II

    This kind of "nationalist" was/is a product of dysgenic colonial training.
    They are everywhere. Nowadays only North Korea, China, Iran and to some degree, god forbids, russia, can be considered true nationalists. The rests are just peasants, occupied cucks and useful idiots.
  • @Showmethereal
    @Daniel Chieh

    Is this a joke? The overwhelming majority of westerners have not the slightest clue of what you mention. You must be talking about people who took some Asian studies classes at their university. That is a minority of the population
    In any event this is about GDP... Stop wasting space claiming westerners know Japanese values. "Joe Six Pack" who grew up playing videogames in the arcade and at home knows as little about Japanese culture as he knows about what China's GDP relative to the US in 2050 will be.
    Playing Shinobi on Sega didnt make him a fan of Japan. He just thinks it was cool for a ninja to kill enemies. It did add to Japanese GDP when he bought the game. But Joe Six Pack prefers a Smith & Wesson pistol now rather than learning the art on ninjitsu - which actually was adapted from Chinese military training manuals on stealth warfare - but I digress.... So now that Smith &Wesson adds to US GDP - not Japan's. His kid is most likely playing Call Of Duty killing people with guns in the game and practicing no Japanese ethics.... And adding nothing to Japan's GDP as that game is American made.

    Now Toyotas and Hondas do more for Japan's soft power and GDP. People equate those with Japanese thought in terms of long term reliability and efficiency. Even if that is not necessarily anything that sets them apart now - that is cemented in the minds of westerners...

    Replies: @Daniel Chieh

    Your argument is incoherent on multiple levels.

    1. Someone who played Ninja Gaiden enough to actually form parts of his identity from it will identify with the main character and sympathize to formerly foreign names and ideas. He will find the ideas of ninjas, demons and the outlines of the story to be cool. He will associate his happiness while playing with these formerly foreign aspects such as Japanese words. He will likely find girls in yukatas sexy.

    He doesn’t need to want to be a ninja. The impact of soft power is enough in that it builds a sense of familiarity.

    If for some reason someday he ever needs to make a decision on something Chinese vs Japanese, our video game player has a now unconscious basis of positive feelings for Japanese.

    2. You are incorrect on popularity. Japanese themed games, almost surprisingly, smash record sales.

    https://gamingbolt.com/sekiro-shadows-die-twice-tops-media-create-charts-with-almost-160k-copies-sold

    Sekiro: Shadows Die Twice is now the developer’s second title to reach “No. 1 in All Formats†in the UK, with the first being Dark Souls 3, which released in 2016.

    The UK is part of the West. Dark Souls 3 was ALSO another Japanese game from the same studio. But even if you were correct, Call of Duty runs on PlayStation, which is Japanese.

    3. Nonsequitor of origin of Japanese style is meaningless. It doesn’t matter where ninjitsu comes from. It doesn’t matter where flour from bread comes from, the consumer only experiences the end product and makes associations on the bread with the store and brand he purchased. In fact, if China has the same base qualities but is unable to make it marketable, it just shows the Chinese as being additionally incapable.

    Fortunately, like I said, the more successful Chinese soft power generators like miohiyo are ignoring your line of thinking. It is a concern if your line of thinking is common, though, because its immeasurably wrong and fundamentally poor for soft power. China has been horrible at the latter. She needs to get over herself and learn from those who do it better.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Brian Damage
    @Daniel Chieh

    The main problem but also a blessing is China's leadership. It is shaped by a bunch of stiff engineers who looked for solutions in inorganic ways. Effective but cold.

    It is a blessing because bypassing redtapes and consensus, these engineers were able to tackle complex problems facing China immediately. The enormous growth of the past few decades can be attributed to this.

    It is a problem because as China's economy matures, it naturally will compete with higher value added economies like the US and that's when soft power, a great multiplier comes into play. Having these engineers and their engineer subordinates to coordinate some kind of a soft power offensive is like having a math nerd with zero social skills trying tell others how to get girls.

    I feel China has reached a point where it has to recruit artists into its leadership. By artist, I meant people who are creative visionaries.

    As a country progress, it must be organic, cohesive and strategic. Sort of like Japan but in a Chinese way.

    Replies: @Munga Bulga, @Astuteobservor II
    , @showmethereal
    @Daniel Chieh

    1) is Ninja Gaiden even REMOTELY as popular as franchises that I named like Super Mario or Sonic - or Legend of Zelda???? No - not even remotely.

    2) you are talking about 2016 - I'm talking about the 1980's... You seem to miss that fact.. And for the record Sony moved it's videogame division headquarters to the US now. Also I looked up "Dark Souls". What on earth does that have to do with Japan and Japanese culture?????

    3) China never wanted to popularize martial arts in the first place. You don't get it that's why Bruce Lee became who he became. He involved westerners in martial arts and is more famous than any Japanese star. My point is China didn't seek to appease the west... The Japanese did after WW2.

    4) false.... Western powers control western society and who is seen as good and who is seen as bad. Pew Research reflects that. Look at the plot to "Tomorrow Never Dies". China yet wasn't the bad guy so the plot to the film... But back when the Chinese were the bad guys previously such as in Dr. No or The Man with the Golden Gun - i'm sure Pew results would reflect. In the 70's Japanese were portrayed in the west as docile and subservient... By the 80's when Japan became the bad guy because of her economic rise - she was portrayed as ruthless again. If you can find Pew results they would reflect that in western societies.
  • @Smith
    @Astuteobservor II

    I wanted to post some angry replies, but then again, I think I have danced this dance too many times. I want to clarify that we were discussing the capacity of Ming chinks colonization during Zheng He times, Vietnam is just a part of the argument.

    There were chink shills who believe that during Ming era, they ruled the world, and only spared the world from chink colonization due to their oh so peaceful culture, I smash their delusion by pointing out weakness of the Ming during the times, and how they cannot go on naval expansion/colonization as the whiteys did.

    The chinks who go on to attack me and Vietnam just show how insecure they are regarding history.

    I have already discussed the topic of GDP above, and I agree with A. Karlin that China will massively expand their GDP during the upcoming years. This is due to the economic model used, and has less to do with traditional chink culture or Han genetic or whatsoever.

    My only other point is with singy chink, and his disbelief in Japan soft power vs the current chink soft power.

    Replies: @Deep Thought, @Astuteobservor II

    The chinks who go on to attack me and Vietnam just show how insecure they are regarding history.

    YOU are the one “who goes on to attack Chinese and China” non-stop on this forum. The Chinese posters are merely RESPONDING to your mad assaults.

    If China/Chinese really are as bad as you claim, then you are merely admitting that nam/viets are just small versions of China/Chinese– from intellectual ability to chauvinist attitude, from body size to penis size– which, of course, is the chauvinist Chinese’s view about nam/viets, and which is also the view the viets resent the MOST!!!
    .
    If you were a real viet, WHY are you working so hard to propagate a narrative that the viets hate so much???!!!

    •ï¿½Replies: @Smith
    @Deep Thought

    & @ Astuteobservor II

    This must be famous “hurt feelings of the chinese people".

    I'm sorry, my chink friends, for your hurt feelings, but talking and discussion of China history in a topic about China isn't off-topic.

    @ d dan

    One question: is there any proof that Zheng He could "easily" set up colonies in these nations if he "tried" to?

    That's a funny thing to assume, because the Ming indeed put troops in Vietnam and were beaten back by Le Loi’s army who were tribesmen at the times. And Vietnam shares a land border with Ming China.

    The chinks love to play up Zheng He's fleets, but their actual military accomplishment in foreign land shows a different reality.

    I fear that after American exceptionalism, Chinese exceptionalism will be the next thing, where the talking point would be WE CHAYNESE COULDA CONQUA DA WHOLE WORLD WE JUST CHOSE NOT TO, and history repeats itself.

    Replies: @Deep Thought, @Astuteobservor II, @Philip Owen
  • @Daniel Chieh
    @showmethereal

    This fell almost into "this is too crazy to reply to", but the answer is simply that you are overwhelmingly wrong.

    You strike me as someone with profoundly little knowledge of the West. This makes your appraisal of the West's understanding of Japan(or Asia in general) even more shockingly wildly random.

    Japan manages to broadcast its values of gambatte, its vision of historical events("We did nothing wrong, surely."), its particular forms of respect and cooperation, even its fetishes and language. Consider something even as brief at this, which is clearly nationalistic but nonetheless would likely be cheered on even by a foreign audience already attached to the characters in A Place Further than the Universe which claims that Japan was isolated after WW2 and "bullied", but nonetheless proved their worth to become awesome(!) in an episode. Because, as usual, a culture tends to portray itself in positive terms, those who have identified with the show will at least agree with that attitude(which ignores the fact that Japan was being isolated for a reason).

    Along with video games and other media, it manages a sweep far wider than the Hong Kong movies and had devotees much more into it - and as per Pareto Principle, you only need a small number of dedicated individuals to make a big difference. And its not that small of a number.

    In summation, you're just totally off kilter here. Conveying the values they wanted, even if they use characters which look profoundly caucasian(questionable at times), is hugely influential and beneficial for them in terms of soft power. Fortunately, China is doing something with Honkai Impact, Genshin Impact, etc and not following your methodology of irritating audience members.

    Replies: @Showmethereal

    Is this a joke? The overwhelming majority of westerners have not the slightest clue of what you mention. You must be talking about people who took some Asian studies classes at their university. That is a minority of the population
    In any event this is about GDP… Stop wasting space claiming westerners know Japanese values. “Joe Six Pack” who grew up playing videogames in the arcade and at home knows as little about Japanese culture as he knows about what China’s GDP relative to the US in 2050 will be.
    Playing Shinobi on Sega didnt make him a fan of Japan. He just thinks it was cool for a ninja to kill enemies. It did add to Japanese GDP when he bought the game. But Joe Six Pack prefers a Smith & Wesson pistol now rather than learning the art on ninjitsu – which actually was adapted from Chinese military training manuals on stealth warfare – but I digress…. So now that Smith &Wesson adds to US GDP – not Japan’s. His kid is most likely playing Call Of Duty killing people with guns in the game and practicing no Japanese ethics…. And adding nothing to Japan’s GDP as that game is American made.

    Now Toyotas and Hondas do more for Japan’s soft power and GDP. People equate those with Japanese thought in terms of long term reliability and efficiency. Even if that is not necessarily anything that sets them apart now – that is cemented in the minds of westerners…

    •ï¿½Replies: @Daniel Chieh
    @Showmethereal

    Your argument is incoherent on multiple levels.

    1. Someone who played Ninja Gaiden enough to actually form parts of his identity from it will identify with the main character and sympathize to formerly foreign names and ideas. He will find the ideas of ninjas, demons and the outlines of the story to be cool. He will associate his happiness while playing with these formerly foreign aspects such as Japanese words. He will likely find girls in yukatas sexy.

    He doesn't need to want to be a ninja. The impact of soft power is enough in that it builds a sense of familiarity.

    If for some reason someday he ever needs to make a decision on something Chinese vs Japanese, our video game player has a now unconscious basis of positive feelings for Japanese.

    2. You are incorrect on popularity. Japanese themed games, almost surprisingly, smash record sales.

    https://gamingbolt.com/sekiro-shadows-die-twice-tops-media-create-charts-with-almost-160k-copies-sold

    Sekiro: Shadows Die Twice is now the developer’s second title to reach “No. 1 in All Formats†in the UK, with the first being Dark Souls 3, which released in 2016.

    �
    The UK is part of the West. Dark Souls 3 was ALSO another Japanese game from the same studio. But even if you were correct, Call of Duty runs on PlayStation, which is Japanese.

    3. Nonsequitor of origin of Japanese style is meaningless. It doesn't matter where ninjitsu comes from. It doesn't matter where flour from bread comes from, the consumer only experiences the end product and makes associations on the bread with the store and brand he purchased. In fact, if China has the same base qualities but is unable to make it marketable, it just shows the Chinese as being additionally incapable.

    Fortunately, like I said, the more successful Chinese soft power generators like miohiyo are ignoring your line of thinking. It is a concern if your line of thinking is common, though, because its immeasurably wrong and fundamentally poor for soft power. China has been horrible at the latter. She needs to get over herself and learn from those who do it better.

    Replies: @Brian Damage, @showmethereal
  • Smith says:
    @Astuteobservor II
    @Smith

    Why is it every chinese article will have you coming in trying to make it about China vs Vietnam? I am sorry to tell you, but no one is interested besides a few chinese anons who feels the need to respond to your comments.

    Please discuss the topic at hand. And if you don't know anything, kindly stfu. Every damn article with your comments turns to shit tier, literally.

    Replies: @Brian Damage, @Smith

    I wanted to post some angry replies, but then again, I think I have danced this dance too many times. I want to clarify that we were discussing the capacity of Ming chinks colonization during Zheng He times, Vietnam is just a part of the argument.

    There were chink shills who believe that during Ming era, they ruled the world, and only spared the world from chink colonization due to their oh so peaceful culture, I smash their delusion by pointing out weakness of the Ming during the times, and how they cannot go on naval expansion/colonization as the whiteys did.

    The chinks who go on to attack me and Vietnam just show how insecure they are regarding history.

    I have already discussed the topic of GDP above, and I agree with A. Karlin that China will massively expand their GDP during the upcoming years. This is due to the economic model used, and has less to do with traditional chink culture or Han genetic or whatsoever.

    My only other point is with singy chink, and his disbelief in Japan soft power vs the current chink soft power.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Deep Thought
    @Smith


    The chinks who go on to attack me and Vietnam just show how insecure they are regarding history.
    �
    YOU are the one "who goes on to attack Chinese and China" non-stop on this forum. The Chinese posters are merely RESPONDING to your mad assaults.

    If China/Chinese really are as bad as you claim, then you are merely admitting that nam/viets are just small versions of China/Chinese– from intellectual ability to chauvinist attitude, from body size to penis size– which, of course, is the chauvinist Chinese’s view about nam/viets, and which is also the view the viets resent the MOST!!!
    .
    If you were a real viet, WHY are you working so hard to propagate a narrative that the viets hate so much???!!!

    Replies: @Smith
    , @Astuteobservor II
    @Smith

    And you direct the conversation towards this in every fucking article on china.

    That is trolling. Almost on a professional level.

    I read almost every article about china on unz. The tail end of every comments section has your retarded comments steering the conversation to China vs Vietnam.

    Every single one.

    Please kindly stfu about it. No one gives a fuck about Vietnam geopolitically or economically. Or how China has wronged your country. Most of it are incoherent babble.

    Get fucking over it. Show the Chinese you are better by making your country better. You need to learn from thulean friend on how to attack China.

    Replies: @Brian Damage, @Munga Bulga
  • @Tyler Durden
    If there was a derivatives market for this bet, I would invest heavily in Thulean Friend.

    China has nowhere to go once it hits the technological ceiling. That will happen much sooner than 2050, probably 2030 at the latest.

    The Chinese haven't invented anything in 600 years. The inventions attributed to the Chinese in antiquity (paper, money, printing press, compass) are of unknown origin. In the 19th century, British sinophiles arbitrarily assigned all major inventions with unknown genesis to the Chinese, hence the myth of Chinese inventiveness. The Chinese have never been a creative people. Their art and music are unremarkable and unvaried. The China you see today was built by the West. Western architects are engineers are the brains behind China's development. Nearly every major skyscraper in China was designed by Americans or Europeans. And all technological advanced were bought or stolen (more often the latter) from Caucasians. Even China's government and political framework is a cheap knock-off of the Soviet model.

    By 2030, China will be roughly on par with the US on nominal GDP. Around this time, there will be little left to copy or steal from the West and the Chinese government will have to get creative (unlikely) to keep GDP growing at even 2% annually.

    The first aircraft carrier built by China is a replica of a carrier they purchased from Ukraine in 1998. It even has the obsolete curves runway (a laughable feature for a brand-new carrier), because the Chinese copied everything (including the flaws) from the Soviet carrier. China is a hollow power, everything is for optics. There is very little real power.

    That the Chinese can copy anything, even the most complex technology, is China's greatest strength and weakness simultaneously. It allowed China to develop faster than any other major economy in world history. On the downside, it ensures that they can never truly surpass the creative West and lead the world.

    China is massive but ultimately mediocre nation. And Karlin gets that right.

    Replies: @Sinotibetan, @reiner Tor, @Anon99, @Abelard Lindsey, @GuestAug

    For a country that has not invented anything in 600 years, as you claim, the Chinese file a surprisingly large number of patent applications

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Intellectual_Property_Indicators

  • @showmethereal
    @Daniel Chieh

    Ok let me ask a serious question... What of Japanese values does the west know about??? What the west knows about Japan is "good at electronics" and "follows our governmental and economic systems". Most people in the west have zero clue about Japanese culture. Anime is a niche market in the west. In the same way Hong Kong kung fu movies were in the 70's and 80's. But at least those Hong Kong movies were 100% Asian (and Chinese specifically since Hong Kong people back then never denied being Chinese like the new generation)

    It's not about ego... It's really about self respect. All Asians have that problem in the 20th century when wanting to sell to the west. The exception was Bruce Lee - and that was because his pride welled up in him because of the discrimination he experienced in the US.
    Japan - I think because of the scars of WW2 it is more pronounced.

    Replies: @Daniel Chieh

    This fell almost into “this is too crazy to reply to”, but the answer is simply that you are overwhelmingly wrong.

    You strike me as someone with profoundly little knowledge of the West. This makes your appraisal of the West’s understanding of Japan(or Asia in general) even more shockingly wildly random.

    Japan manages to broadcast its values of gambatte, its vision of historical events(“We did nothing wrong, surely.”), its particular forms of respect and cooperation, even its fetishes and language. Consider something even as brief at this, which is clearly nationalistic but nonetheless would likely be cheered on even by a foreign audience already attached to the characters in A Place Further than the Universe which claims that Japan was isolated after WW2 and “bullied”, but nonetheless proved their worth to become awesome(!) in an episode. Because, as usual, a culture tends to portray itself in positive terms, those who have identified with the show will at least agree with that attitude(which ignores the fact that Japan was being isolated for a reason).

    Along with video games and other media, it manages a sweep far wider than the Hong Kong movies and had devotees much more into it – and as per Pareto Principle, you only need a small number of dedicated individuals to make a big difference. And its not that small of a number.

    In summation, you’re just totally off kilter here. Conveying the values they wanted, even if they use characters which look profoundly caucasian(questionable at times), is hugely influential and beneficial for them in terms of soft power. Fortunately, China is doing something with Honkai Impact, Genshin Impact, etc and not following your methodology of irritating audience members.

    •ï¿½Agree: AaronB
    •ï¿½Replies: @Showmethereal
    @Daniel Chieh

    Is this a joke? The overwhelming majority of westerners have not the slightest clue of what you mention. You must be talking about people who took some Asian studies classes at their university. That is a minority of the population
    In any event this is about GDP... Stop wasting space claiming westerners know Japanese values. "Joe Six Pack" who grew up playing videogames in the arcade and at home knows as little about Japanese culture as he knows about what China's GDP relative to the US in 2050 will be.
    Playing Shinobi on Sega didnt make him a fan of Japan. He just thinks it was cool for a ninja to kill enemies. It did add to Japanese GDP when he bought the game. But Joe Six Pack prefers a Smith & Wesson pistol now rather than learning the art on ninjitsu - which actually was adapted from Chinese military training manuals on stealth warfare - but I digress.... So now that Smith &Wesson adds to US GDP - not Japan's. His kid is most likely playing Call Of Duty killing people with guns in the game and practicing no Japanese ethics.... And adding nothing to Japan's GDP as that game is American made.

    Now Toyotas and Hondas do more for Japan's soft power and GDP. People equate those with Japanese thought in terms of long term reliability and efficiency. Even if that is not necessarily anything that sets them apart now - that is cemented in the minds of westerners...

    Replies: @Daniel Chieh
  • @Astuteobservor II
    @Smith

    Why is it every chinese article will have you coming in trying to make it about China vs Vietnam? I am sorry to tell you, but no one is interested besides a few chinese anons who feels the need to respond to your comments.

    Please discuss the topic at hand. And if you don't know anything, kindly stfu. Every damn article with your comments turns to shit tier, literally.

    Replies: @Brian Damage, @Smith

    has no clue in the Sino dynamics in Asia and took everything at face value. If you ever been to Vietnam you would have realized that most of the affluent Vietnamese are Hans. And these Hans shape government policies. Sure, they might not be CCP Hans , more like the Hans in HK, Singapore, Taiwan and South East Asia, they are Hans nonetheless.

    It is like how Americans view the conflict between Taiwan And China as though it is like a conflict between US and Russia. It is much more complicated than that. Many in Taiwan have relatives in the Fujian province and vice versa. People in Taiwan prefer the system that have but at the same time envious of the sudden wealth on their home province. Most Taiwanese would rather be free of the CCP grip until China outgrow CCP.

    •ï¿½Agree: showmethereal
  • @Lot
    Thulean’s post is well written and correct.

    Lol at the idea Chinese per cap GDP will ever come close to the USA. Japan is at 39k to 63k US, and the Japanese are really obviously superior to the Chinese in every way.

    The only way this happens is the US gets Third Worldified by migration faster than the present trend. Maybe.

    We’ll also eventually see what happens with third world migration when Chinese wages get high enough to attract some. I doubt they’d be so dumb to admit Somalis. But small manageable and compliant South and SE Asians? “We need them to stay competitive! Chinese won’t work in toy factory 60 hours a week anymore!â€

    Replies: @mal, @Blinky Bill, @Suicidal_canadian, @rensselaer, @Randolph Nugent

    Interesting comment.
    But I think there are additional important factors.
    Remember the US economy and ability to buy is boosted by the dollar being a reserve currency for the world, and the dollar being used for oil transactions. This can’t last and as the dollar falls the US will be less able to buy from the world. You also need to look at the continuing massive spending on the military industrial complex, again financed by the reserve dollar status… otherwise, where does the money come from?
    Finally, (for now) but certainly not least, is the crumbling US infrastructure which has to be rebuilt; how will this be paid for? If at all.
    And all this reflects on the devaluing of human capital in the US, poor education, for profit medical care, and massively inequality in income.
    Corrupt government has many consequences, and it just is not responsive, fast enough, to the needs of the people.

  • @GuestAug
    Well, some people, including many people in China, believe that Maoism is exactly what made China's current success possible. It was the educational reforms instituted by Mao after the communist party had taken over China that turned a nation of illiterate, opium-smoking peasants into a highly competitive labor force.

    Replies: @EldnahYm

    It was because of Mao’s policies that so many Chinese were illiterate peasants for as long as they were.

    You have a point about opium though. Mao has to be regarded as the world’s most accomplished drug addiction therapist.

  • @Lake Wobegon
    @EldnahYm

    Right, so Donald Trump did not spent four years doing all this trade war stuff because it is just too insignificant to matter.

    Replies: @EldnahYm

    You’re nitpicking over small potatoes. You should be sarcastically commenting about how absurd it is to suggest trade doesn’t matter considering the United States has been enforcing free trade deals all over the world for decades, being the world’s policeman post-WW2, and caring about the status of the U.S. dollar as a reserve currency. Recent policy over the last four years is insignificant compared to all that.

    Either all the U.S. wailing about trade is cover for something else(like taking down the Soviet Union for just one example), or U.S. foreign policy is irrational. Or a combination of the two. Take your pick.

  • @Smith
    @AltanBakshi

    Since you are the only one who argue seriously, I will follow suit.

    Spain and Portugal did not start colonizing New World right away, but they got valuable experience for such endeavours by colonizing Madeira, Azores and the Canary Islands first. In similar way Ming could have very easily started the colonization of the Philippines and Taiwan first. Why to go Australia if you as good lands for colonization nearby?
    �
    Again, I argue they cannot due to the lack of their technology, their internal rife and of course adversaries. Taiwan can be colonized and has indeed colonized by the Ming, and later conquered by the Qing due to their closeness to the mainland, but for successful of conquest of Phillipines, they need faster ships OR a foothold like Vietnam. They failed to have both.

    Early Ming had no problems with Mongols, actually early Ming was on offensive regarding the Mongols, its only after the Tumu crisis that the Mongols became a recurring problem for the Ming, and the Manchus only became a serious problem in the last decades of the Ming.
    �
    Early Ming went on to fight the mongols to finish them off, this is their major activity aside from the failed occupation of Vietnam. And the mongols continue to be a bother for the Ming up to the 1500s, then the jap invasion of the Korean and then the rise of Manchu basically capture the Ming's full attention, so I argue there's no good sweet times for the Ming to go naval expansion.

    No, Manchus were not at all interested in Naval expansion and because they were very conscious about their minority status, they were obsessed with stability and harmony, even more than your average Chinese dynasties.
    �
    Manchu were interested in expansion, seeing how their Qing dynasty manages to hold more territories than the Ming, they just could not focus on naval expansion.

    Also Qing had calm and stable mercantile relations with Japan, what resistance you are talking of?
    �
    Tokugawa Japan was stable, but proved unconquerable to early Qing China, while Meiji Japan was very hostile to late Qing China.

    still in the end Burma and Vietnam all accepted the Qing overlordship. What Qing should have done, annexed Vietnam and Burma?
    �
    Qing couldn't have conquered Nguyen Vietnam (the gate to SEA) at the times, especially when there's french intervention. There's nothing Qing could do at the times to colonize naval territories (aside from Taiwan), it's already too late because the westerners are already in Asia.

    Replies: @Astuteobservor II

    Why is it every chinese article will have you coming in trying to make it about China vs Vietnam? I am sorry to tell you, but no one is interested besides a few chinese anons who feels the need to respond to your comments.

    Please discuss the topic at hand. And if you don’t know anything, kindly stfu. Every damn article with your comments turns to shit tier, literally.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Brian Damage
    @Astuteobservor II

    @Smith has no clue in the Sino dynamics in Asia and took everything at face value. If you ever been to Vietnam you would have realized that most of the affluent Vietnamese are Hans. And these Hans shape government policies. Sure, they might not be CCP Hans , more like the Hans in HK, Singapore, Taiwan and South East Asia, they are Hans nonetheless.

    It is like how Americans view the conflict between Taiwan And China as though it is like a conflict between US and Russia. It is much more complicated than that. Many in Taiwan have relatives in the Fujian province and vice versa. People in Taiwan prefer the system that have but at the same time envious of the sudden wealth on their home province. Most Taiwanese would rather be free of the CCP grip until China outgrow CCP.
    , @Smith
    @Astuteobservor II

    I wanted to post some angry replies, but then again, I think I have danced this dance too many times. I want to clarify that we were discussing the capacity of Ming chinks colonization during Zheng He times, Vietnam is just a part of the argument.

    There were chink shills who believe that during Ming era, they ruled the world, and only spared the world from chink colonization due to their oh so peaceful culture, I smash their delusion by pointing out weakness of the Ming during the times, and how they cannot go on naval expansion/colonization as the whiteys did.

    The chinks who go on to attack me and Vietnam just show how insecure they are regarding history.

    I have already discussed the topic of GDP above, and I agree with A. Karlin that China will massively expand their GDP during the upcoming years. This is due to the economic model used, and has less to do with traditional chink culture or Han genetic or whatsoever.

    My only other point is with singy chink, and his disbelief in Japan soft power vs the current chink soft power.

    Replies: @Deep Thought, @Astuteobservor II
  • @Daniel Chieh
    @noname27

    Man you'll look silly in 2050

    Replies: @noname27

    I won’t be here in 2050.

  • Rdm says:
    @Ron Unz
    @Rdm


    Have you ever heard of Han Chinese destroying foreign national treasure? You’ve heard Chinese are sneaky, devious, unscrupulous but Europeans are so benevolent and kind-hearted that there’s no mention of the Summer Palace destroyed by British and French in MSM.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Summer_Palace

    ...On one hand, you have no historical events of Han Chinese destroying foreign treasures in foreign lands in thousands of years.
    �
    Well, I'm not sure that's entirely fair. After all, for the last couple of thousand years China had controlled nearly all the civilized regions in its vicinity, so its (border) wars were mostly fought against steppe barbarians. When victorious, the Chinese might massacre them, but they probably didn't have any "foreign treasures" worth destroying.

    On the other hand, consider the case of the (very harsh) first emperor, who established the Chinese Empire. Didn't he supposedly destroy an enormous number of ancient books and documents and massacre huge numbers of scholars in order to "culturally unify" his new state by stamping out preexisting regional languages and ideas?

    Throughout history, countries that fought each other have not infrequently burned down and destroyed the capital cities of their enemies, and if China had had rival powers in its part of the world, I expect it would have done the same. I'm not an expert on Chinese history, but didn't this sort of thing sometimes happen during the various civil wars or earlier, in the Warring States period?

    Replies: @JohnnyWalker123, @Daniel Chieh, @Rdm, @Philip Owen

    Well, it would be utterly silly if I claim Chinese are peace-loving species and their way of life is an epitome of humanity and civilization. The emphasis is on the nature of the aggressiveness developed over centuries of national activities. Given the historical evidence of many periods of war in China, one would be naïve to think that all warriors be trained to only kill and capture the opponents.

    Let’s say Han Chinese reached the superiority of navy exploration during Ming Dynasty and arrived at the British Isles. They wanted to conquer the Europe, slowly making inroads from coastal area in the pretext of tea trading. Due to trade conflict, they destroyed a private property, Buckingham Palace.

    In 200 years, some retard Chinese comes into Unz webzine and proudly claim, “We Chinese are daring species and adventurous. Those crooked British are a piece of shit.â€

    As a sane person without any philia or phobia, you’d question the stupidity of mankind.

    Just to give you a scale of each place.

    Buckingham Palace = 40 acres
    Old Summer Palace = 860 acres

    The palace was so large – covering more than 3.5 square kilometres (860 acres) – that it took 4,000 men 3 days of burning to destroy it.[4] Many exquisite artworks – sculptures, porcelain, jade, silk robes, elaborate textiles, gold objects and more – were looted and are now found in 47 museums around the world, according to UNESCO.

    Notre-Dame de Paris caught fire and the entire world moaned for national treasure.

  • I have been doing some thinking about China’s future GDP. I feel that China’s GDP in 2050 will plateau for a while at high 20k USD in today’s dollars. Meanwhile, the US’s GDP will stay stagnant double that of China but will eventually recede to high 30s (in today’s dollars).

    I feel the authors above failed to take into the account of the fluidity of world economics and assume everything will remain status quo. The US was a beneficiary of the tail end of the industrial revolution but the 21st century economy is drastically different. That’s why Trump won. There is a general dissatisfaction with the way things are going. Many are hoping of the resurgence of post-WW2 economy which will never happen. The post-colonial afterglow has dissipated and the world order has changed whether you can comprehend it or not. Most are still operating under the assumption that it is still a Western dominated world when is has already moved to a multi-polar world and China is slowly getting back to the pre-1800 economic dominance.

    In 2050, China will face a huge retiring population and a smaller workforce. There is a reason why China is rushing towards automation and AI to cover the gap. China’s post Mao citizens will be in position of leaderships and the old guards are all either dead or retired. While the current CCP regime is hell bent of controlling the Han nationalists by exerting more control on the populace, by 2050, the new generation of leaders will most likely embrace Han nationalism and the CCP will be swept away. It will be a “Bigger Taiwan” by then. There are enough supporters of a “Bigger Taiwan” around and many of the overseas Chinese, in South East Asia, Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan and other parts of the world would love to see that. We might see a resurgence of Sun-Yat-Sen-ism. Or we might see a Singapore-like style of governance.

  • @AP
    @showmethereal

    Sure, but I did not mean to imply that the Chinese were trying to model themselves on Taiwan politically and socially, rather that Taiwan is a model of what China would be like in terms of per capita economic strength

    Replies: @showmethereal

    Oh ok – now I understand…. Though in terms of per capita that would be immensely tough since the population on the mainland is soooo much larger. I would give you Fujian province. Fujian passed Taiwan this year in GDP – but of course with a larger population it is lower per capita. But Fujian still has a higher share of rural population also. As it urbanizes it will reach parity per capita (compare Shanghai and the whole of Taiwan… urban Shanghai has a high per capita GDP and life expectancy in comparison to the whole island – but is similar when comparing just Taipei). Many Taiwan people already work in Xiamen for example. The quality of life and life expectancy there matches Taiwan cities and has the same Hokkien presence.

  • Why not break all the posts into groups in different pages so that you don’t have to load all the posts in order to read the last few?

  • @showmethereal
    @Deep Thought

    Yes - and now since the US wants to contain China - the US and by extension Japan and Australia - is backing Vietnam. It's hypocrisy... But hypocrisy always backfires one way or another. The rest of the ASEAN countries knows the hypocrisy and so refuses to get involved. The Philippines because of their historical colonization by Spain and the US - it depends on who gets voted in. Duterte obviously called out the folly - but no telling about another administration.

    Replies: @Deep Thought

    ‘China wants to lead, rather simply join’: top Australian diplomat takes aim at Beijing’s foreign policy

    Frances Adamson has accused Beijing of setting its own agenda internationally rather than working collaboratively with other countries

    She says the main challenge for Australia is helping to shape a new global order without the influence of an inwardly focused US

    https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/3111354/china-wants-lead-rather-simply-join-top-australian-diplomat

    How dare these Chinese actually WANT to lead???!!! That is an unbearable affront to the Whites’ dignity.

    Don’t they know that only the Whites are entitled to lead in this world? Now, “without the influence of an inwardly focused US”, “America’s deputy sheriff in Asia” must “shape a new global order”– that actually follows an OLD formula of domination by the White race– in which a dark, inconspicuous, PLACE in a corner will be reserved to put these over-ambitious Chinese in.

    •ï¿½Replies: @showmethereal
    @Deep Thought

    Yes indeed... But what else can one expect from someone who represents the 5 Eyes. Nobody else should be able to set rules in their eyes. The economic balance is shifting back toward Asia. So why do they expect Asia not to have a say... China being the largest in China - it should be expected China would want more of a say.
    , @Deep Thought
    @Deep Thought

    When "America's Deputy Sherriff in Asia" "wants to lead":

    Atrocities included the murder of two 14-year-old boys, who had their throats slit by Australian troops and subsequently had their bodies bagged up and dumped in a river.
    �

    The academic Randa Abdel Fattah wrote that the behaviour of the Australian soldiers was not the work of ‘bad apples’, and could not be extricated from the wider issues of white supremacy and western militarism.

    “Anybody half conscious since 2001 will have witnessed the political & media dehumanisation of Afghans as enemies, terrorists, disposable. Where's the surprise in all this? THIS is who White Australia is. Not an aberration, but war crimes two decades in the training.†Abdel Fattah wrote.
    �
    https://www.trtworld.com/magazine/slitting-the-throats-of-boys-anger-as-report-details-australia-war-crimes-41616

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-GPplTKCYpQ


    And Morrison blames China for telling the truth:

    https://asiatimes.com/2020/11/chinese-officials-tweet-repugnant-australian-pm/
  • @songbird
    @Smith

    Chinese movies, on the whole, don't seem to have a significant export market compared to Hollywood. Most of those totals are essentially Chinese domestic box office, and probably inflated through manipulation, like free tickets.

    I don't think China had really formulated a strategic response to Hollywood. It is a shame really. If I were the Chinese leadership, I would be trying to destroy Hollywood. But I doubt that they really see the danger of poz as such - it's long been a blindness within East Asia because of lack of experience with diversity.

    Replies: @showmethereal

    You are mostly correct. In fact there was great “anger” in the Chinese film industry over Kung Fu Panda series being so popular. Why? To paraphrase – they said: “this is a Chinese story and is worldwide popular – WE should have been the ones to make this and not Hollywood”.

    They do however understand the danger of Hollywood in China. That’s why only a certain number of Hollywood movies are allowed into the country every year. Nothing with gratuitous violence or overt sex scenes or overt gay agendas. Though a few other Asian nations also don’t allow those things such as Singapore (through the “refusal of classification” laws). I believe Indonesia and Malaysia do require some sort of censorship with certain topics in films.

  • @Deep Thought
    @showmethereal

    An old reply of mine to some Vietnamese poster on the Economist forum:

    ý@ýýýýHin reply to guest-omnnmeiSep 3rd, 05:49
    This map shows how many Spratly islets that are occupied by Vietnam and other claimants:
    .
    https://www.eurasiareview.com/20072020-spratly-islands-and-geopolitical-dimensions-analysis/
    .
    The little red flags with only one star are Vietnamese, NOT Chinese, flags. And they are all over the place.
    .
    And this one shows the occupied islets in relation to the 200nm exclusive economic zones of various countries neighbouring SCS:
    .
    https://www.peacepalacelibrary.nl/south-china-sea-territorial-disputes-continued/
    .
    Nearly all the occupied islets are OUTSIDE Vietnam's 200nm exclusive economic zone. Most of what Vietnam is occupying lie within other people's zones.
    .
    Of ALL the claimants in the SCS disputes, Vietnam is the MOST aggressive in islet grabs. Yet, it cries the LOUDEST when it comes to play victim.
    .
    You are a shameless and compulsive Viet liar.
    .
    If it wasn't for your incessant lying I would not have kept searching the internet and assembled these facts! ;-D, ;-D, ;-D Until now, I thought Vietnam was a genuine victim in the SCS disputes. How ironic!!!
    �

    Replies: @TSS, @showmethereal

    Yes – and now since the US wants to contain China – the US and by extension Japan and Australia – is backing Vietnam. It’s hypocrisy… But hypocrisy always backfires one way or another. The rest of the ASEAN countries knows the hypocrisy and so refuses to get involved. The Philippines because of their historical colonization by Spain and the US – it depends on who gets voted in. Duterte obviously called out the folly – but no telling about another administration.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Deep Thought
    @showmethereal


    ‘China wants to lead, rather simply join’: top Australian diplomat takes aim at Beijing’s foreign policy

    Frances Adamson has accused Beijing of setting its own agenda internationally rather than working collaboratively with other countries

    She says the main challenge for Australia is helping to shape a new global order without the influence of an inwardly focused US

    https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/3111354/china-wants-lead-rather-simply-join-top-australian-diplomat
    �
    How dare these Chinese actually WANT to lead???!!! That is an unbearable affront to the Whites' dignity.

    Don't they know that only the Whites are entitled to lead in this world? Now, "without the influence of an inwardly focused US", "America's deputy sheriff in Asia" must "shape a new global order"-- that actually follows an OLD formula of domination by the White race-- in which a dark, inconspicuous, PLACE in a corner will be reserved to put these over-ambitious Chinese in.

    Replies: @showmethereal, @Deep Thought
  • @Daniel Chieh
    @showmethereal

    Its not just financially, though. Conveying its values and raising soft power is significant in a number of other, beneficial ways for a culture. And if viewers identify with its main characters, whether or not because you depicted it more similar to them, you've created a greater friendliness in the viewers to your culture.

    Getting egoistically tied up in the exact appearances is not all that useful.

    Replies: @showmethereal

    Ok let me ask a serious question… What of Japanese values does the west know about??? What the west knows about Japan is “good at electronics” and “follows our governmental and economic systems”. Most people in the west have zero clue about Japanese culture. Anime is a niche market in the west. In the same way Hong Kong kung fu movies were in the 70’s and 80’s. But at least those Hong Kong movies were 100% Asian (and Chinese specifically since Hong Kong people back then never denied being Chinese like the new generation)

    It’s not about ego… It’s really about self respect. All Asians have that problem in the 20th century when wanting to sell to the west. The exception was Bruce Lee – and that was because his pride welled up in him because of the discrimination he experienced in the US.
    Japan – I think because of the scars of WW2 it is more pronounced.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Daniel Chieh
    @showmethereal

    This fell almost into "this is too crazy to reply to", but the answer is simply that you are overwhelmingly wrong.

    You strike me as someone with profoundly little knowledge of the West. This makes your appraisal of the West's understanding of Japan(or Asia in general) even more shockingly wildly random.

    Japan manages to broadcast its values of gambatte, its vision of historical events("We did nothing wrong, surely."), its particular forms of respect and cooperation, even its fetishes and language. Consider something even as brief at this, which is clearly nationalistic but nonetheless would likely be cheered on even by a foreign audience already attached to the characters in A Place Further than the Universe which claims that Japan was isolated after WW2 and "bullied", but nonetheless proved their worth to become awesome(!) in an episode. Because, as usual, a culture tends to portray itself in positive terms, those who have identified with the show will at least agree with that attitude(which ignores the fact that Japan was being isolated for a reason).

    Along with video games and other media, it manages a sweep far wider than the Hong Kong movies and had devotees much more into it - and as per Pareto Principle, you only need a small number of dedicated individuals to make a big difference. And its not that small of a number.

    In summation, you're just totally off kilter here. Conveying the values they wanted, even if they use characters which look profoundly caucasian(questionable at times), is hugely influential and beneficial for them in terms of soft power. Fortunately, China is doing something with Honkai Impact, Genshin Impact, etc and not following your methodology of irritating audience members.

    Replies: @Showmethereal
  • @AltanBakshi
    @Smith

    The first is the Zheng He’s treasure fleets/Ming naval’s technology, while impressive in size, were traveling very slow and only hugging the coast, meanwhile, Australia and NZ need blue-water navies in order to effectively transport troops, foods, products to colonize.

    Spain and Portugal did not start colonizing New World right away, but they got valuable experience for such endeavours by colonizing Madeira, Azores and the Canary Islands first. In similar way Ming could have very easily started the colonization of the Philippines and Taiwan first. Why to go Australia if you as good lands for colonization nearby?

    Early Ming also has the problems with the mongols while mid-and late Ming has to directly contend with the Manchu in the North and of course the Jap invasion of Korea drains a huge amount of personnel and money.

    Early Ming had no problems with Mongols, actually early Ming was on offensive regarding the Mongols, its only after the Tumu crisis that the Mongols became a recurring problem for the Ming, and the Manchus only became a serious problem in the last decades of the Ming.

    These issues effectively cockblock Ming China’s naval expansion.
    �
    How and why the Ming couldnt have expanded to Taiwan, Philippines and established trading outposts and forts in the Southeast Asia? There was a large movement of Chinese merchants and adventures during the Ming to the SEA region already and as long as the Ming emperors were outward looking they interfered quite actively with the politics of Malaccan sultanates etc. I still claim that the Ming had potential for naval expansion and colonization, its just that they had wrong leaders and political culture for such endeavours.

    This matter is again repeated in Qing China, where they make massive land expansion and taking Tibet, but fail to make another move southward, once again due to the resistance of various SEA countries, Japan and now the westerners.
    �
    No, Manchus were not at all interested in Naval expansion and because they were very conscious about their minority status, they were obsessed with stability and harmony, even more than your average Chinese dynasties. Also Qing had calm and stable mercantile relations with Japan, what resistance you are talking of? Its true that the Qing had problems with expansion to SEA, but no wonder they were at the same moment or almost at the same moment waging multiple wars in Central Asia, Nepal and Tibet, still in the end Burma and Vietnam all accepted the Qing overlordship. What Qing should have done, annexed Vietnam and Burma?

    Replies: @Smith

    Since you are the only one who argue seriously, I will follow suit.

    Spain and Portugal did not start colonizing New World right away, but they got valuable experience for such endeavours by colonizing Madeira, Azores and the Canary Islands first. In similar way Ming could have very easily started the colonization of the Philippines and Taiwan first. Why to go Australia if you as good lands for colonization nearby?

    Again, I argue they cannot due to the lack of their technology, their internal rife and of course adversaries. Taiwan can be colonized and has indeed colonized by the Ming, and later conquered by the Qing due to their closeness to the mainland, but for successful of conquest of Phillipines, they need faster ships OR a foothold like Vietnam. They failed to have both.

    Early Ming had no problems with Mongols, actually early Ming was on offensive regarding the Mongols, its only after the Tumu crisis that the Mongols became a recurring problem for the Ming, and the Manchus only became a serious problem in the last decades of the Ming.

    Early Ming went on to fight the mongols to finish them off, this is their major activity aside from the failed occupation of Vietnam. And the mongols continue to be a bother for the Ming up to the 1500s, then the jap invasion of the Korean and then the rise of Manchu basically capture the Ming’s full attention, so I argue there’s no good sweet times for the Ming to go naval expansion.

    No, Manchus were not at all interested in Naval expansion and because they were very conscious about their minority status, they were obsessed with stability and harmony, even more than your average Chinese dynasties.

    Manchu were interested in expansion, seeing how their Qing dynasty manages to hold more territories than the Ming, they just could not focus on naval expansion.

    Also Qing had calm and stable mercantile relations with Japan, what resistance you are talking of?

    Tokugawa Japan was stable, but proved unconquerable to early Qing China, while Meiji Japan was very hostile to late Qing China.

    still in the end Burma and Vietnam all accepted the Qing overlordship. What Qing should have done, annexed Vietnam and Burma?

    Qing couldn’t have conquered Nguyen Vietnam (the gate to SEA) at the times, especially when there’s french intervention. There’s nothing Qing could do at the times to colonize naval territories (aside from Taiwan), it’s already too late because the westerners are already in Asia.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Astuteobservor II
    @Smith

    Why is it every chinese article will have you coming in trying to make it about China vs Vietnam? I am sorry to tell you, but no one is interested besides a few chinese anons who feels the need to respond to your comments.

    Please discuss the topic at hand. And if you don't know anything, kindly stfu. Every damn article with your comments turns to shit tier, literally.

    Replies: @Brian Damage, @Smith
  • @Smith
    @kemerd

    Seeing "Princes of the Yen" really opened my eyes, it's really down to money and production, or rather controlled money and production. Money MUST be controlled by the state, there cannot be such monstrosity such as state borrowing money from a private bank.

    The problem seems actually easy to solve:
    - Bank of Japan to create money and pump directly into the public's hands in form of stimulus check to create confidence and encourage consumption/spending
    - provide debt forgiven mechanism to the civilians in order to encourage spending and investment
    - re-introduction of "window guidance" i.e. central planning to control spending and loan for specific sectors (focus on industry, agriculture and NOT finance) and of course control of private assets

    It's amazing that war time economy is so much better than the free-market bullshit.

    Perhaps one day Japan will be free of this parasitical alien when the USA goes down, or the samurai has had enough.

    @AltanBakshi

    The first is the Zheng He's treasure fleets/Ming naval's technology, while impressive in size, were traveling very slow and only hugging the coast, meanwhile, Australia and NZ need blue-water navies in order to effectively transport troops, foods, products to colonize.

    The second is the Ming government themselves, while seemingly strong, was also rife with corruption ever since the first Ming Emperor who loved using secret eunuch police.

    The third is again, regional adverseries, it was Early Ming who successfully invaded Vietnam's Tran dynasty, but it was also early Ming who got beaten up by Le Loi, and Le Dynasty is one of Vietnam's greatest where we expand our borders massively against Champa and Laos. This is a time when Ming does not dare going south.

    Early Ming also has the problems with the mongols while mid-and late Ming has to directly contend with the Manchu in the North and of course the Jap invasion of Korea drains a huge amount of personnel and money.

    These issues effectively cockblock Ming China's naval expansion.

    This matter is again repeated in Qing China, where they make massive land expansion and taking Tibet, but fail to make another move southward, once again due to the resistance of various SEA countries, Japan and now the westerners.

    Replies: @AltanBakshi

    The first is the Zheng He’s treasure fleets/Ming naval’s technology, while impressive in size, were traveling very slow and only hugging the coast, meanwhile, Australia and NZ need blue-water navies in order to effectively transport troops, foods, products to colonize.

    Spain and Portugal did not start colonizing New World right away, but they got valuable experience for such endeavours by colonizing Madeira, Azores and the Canary Islands first. In similar way Ming could have very easily started the colonization of the Philippines and Taiwan first. Why to go Australia if you as good lands for colonization nearby?

    Early Ming also has the problems with the mongols while mid-and late Ming has to directly contend with the Manchu in the North and of course the Jap invasion of Korea drains a huge amount of personnel and money.

    Early Ming had no problems with Mongols, actually early Ming was on offensive regarding the Mongols, its only after the Tumu crisis that the Mongols became a recurring problem for the Ming, and the Manchus only became a serious problem in the last decades of the Ming.

    These issues effectively cockblock Ming China’s naval expansion.

    How and why the Ming couldnt have expanded to Taiwan, Philippines and established trading outposts and forts in the Southeast Asia? There was a large movement of Chinese merchants and adventures during the Ming to the SEA region already and as long as the Ming emperors were outward looking they interfered quite actively with the politics of Malaccan sultanates etc. I still claim that the Ming had potential for naval expansion and colonization, its just that they had wrong leaders and political culture for such endeavours.

    This matter is again repeated in Qing China, where they make massive land expansion and taking Tibet, but fail to make another move southward, once again due to the resistance of various SEA countries, Japan and now the westerners.

    No, Manchus were not at all interested in Naval expansion and because they were very conscious about their minority status, they were obsessed with stability and harmony, even more than your average Chinese dynasties. Also Qing had calm and stable mercantile relations with Japan, what resistance you are talking of? Its true that the Qing had problems with expansion to SEA, but no wonder they were at the same moment or almost at the same moment waging multiple wars in Central Asia, Nepal and Tibet, still in the end Burma and Vietnam all accepted the Qing overlordship. What Qing should have done, annexed Vietnam and Burma?

    •ï¿½Replies: @Smith
    @AltanBakshi

    Since you are the only one who argue seriously, I will follow suit.

    Spain and Portugal did not start colonizing New World right away, but they got valuable experience for such endeavours by colonizing Madeira, Azores and the Canary Islands first. In similar way Ming could have very easily started the colonization of the Philippines and Taiwan first. Why to go Australia if you as good lands for colonization nearby?
    �
    Again, I argue they cannot due to the lack of their technology, their internal rife and of course adversaries. Taiwan can be colonized and has indeed colonized by the Ming, and later conquered by the Qing due to their closeness to the mainland, but for successful of conquest of Phillipines, they need faster ships OR a foothold like Vietnam. They failed to have both.

    Early Ming had no problems with Mongols, actually early Ming was on offensive regarding the Mongols, its only after the Tumu crisis that the Mongols became a recurring problem for the Ming, and the Manchus only became a serious problem in the last decades of the Ming.
    �
    Early Ming went on to fight the mongols to finish them off, this is their major activity aside from the failed occupation of Vietnam. And the mongols continue to be a bother for the Ming up to the 1500s, then the jap invasion of the Korean and then the rise of Manchu basically capture the Ming's full attention, so I argue there's no good sweet times for the Ming to go naval expansion.

    No, Manchus were not at all interested in Naval expansion and because they were very conscious about their minority status, they were obsessed with stability and harmony, even more than your average Chinese dynasties.
    �
    Manchu were interested in expansion, seeing how their Qing dynasty manages to hold more territories than the Ming, they just could not focus on naval expansion.

    Also Qing had calm and stable mercantile relations with Japan, what resistance you are talking of?
    �
    Tokugawa Japan was stable, but proved unconquerable to early Qing China, while Meiji Japan was very hostile to late Qing China.

    still in the end Burma and Vietnam all accepted the Qing overlordship. What Qing should have done, annexed Vietnam and Burma?
    �
    Qing couldn't have conquered Nguyen Vietnam (the gate to SEA) at the times, especially when there's french intervention. There's nothing Qing could do at the times to colonize naval territories (aside from Taiwan), it's already too late because the westerners are already in Asia.

    Replies: @Astuteobservor II
  • @TSS
    @Deep Thought

    Don't waste your time associating with a vietgook like Smith. They are like retarded Indians. These people have nothing. Just giving them attention is a win for them.

    Replies: @Deep Thought

    The temptation is too high. I have tried but can’t resist it! My declared aim on the web is to “make the foolish look foolish”!!!

    •ï¿½Thanks: showmethereal
  • @Deep Thought
    @showmethereal

    An old reply of mine to some Vietnamese poster on the Economist forum:

    ý@ýýýýHin reply to guest-omnnmeiSep 3rd, 05:49
    This map shows how many Spratly islets that are occupied by Vietnam and other claimants:
    .
    https://www.eurasiareview.com/20072020-spratly-islands-and-geopolitical-dimensions-analysis/
    .
    The little red flags with only one star are Vietnamese, NOT Chinese, flags. And they are all over the place.
    .
    And this one shows the occupied islets in relation to the 200nm exclusive economic zones of various countries neighbouring SCS:
    .
    https://www.peacepalacelibrary.nl/south-china-sea-territorial-disputes-continued/
    .
    Nearly all the occupied islets are OUTSIDE Vietnam's 200nm exclusive economic zone. Most of what Vietnam is occupying lie within other people's zones.
    .
    Of ALL the claimants in the SCS disputes, Vietnam is the MOST aggressive in islet grabs. Yet, it cries the LOUDEST when it comes to play victim.
    .
    You are a shameless and compulsive Viet liar.
    .
    If it wasn't for your incessant lying I would not have kept searching the internet and assembled these facts! ;-D, ;-D, ;-D Until now, I thought Vietnam was a genuine victim in the SCS disputes. How ironic!!!
    �

    Replies: @TSS, @showmethereal

    Don’t waste your time associating with a vietgook like Smith. They are like retarded Indians. These people have nothing. Just giving them attention is a win for them.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Deep Thought
    @TSS

    The temptation is too high. I have tried but can't resist it! My declared aim on the web is to "make the foolish look foolish"!!!
  • @Thulean Friend
    Now the real imperialists are back in the game. Trump was always an abberation.

    https://twitter.com/JChengWSJ/status/1330020868160892928

    As I say: it's misleading to only compare US vs China. You have to look at the colonial networks each can bring to bear. China has nothing comparable. And never will.

    Replies: @Blinky Bill, @songbird, @Astuteobservor II, @Blinky Bill

    Yet there are now more limits to what American pressure can do. Indeed, countries that displease Washington can now find a patron or ally that is wealthier and, for reasons of geography, often better able to offer them benefits from trade.

    https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/china-not-biden-picks-antony-blinken-jake-sullivan-will-dictate-ncna1248683