');
The Unz Review •ï¿½An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
Topics Filter?
2016 Election 2020 Election 9/11 Afghanistan American Media American Military Britain China Cuba Donald Trump Economics Egypt Foreign Policy France Gaza Government Surveillance Hamas History Ideology Immigration India Iran Iraq Iraq War ISIS Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Japan Joe Biden Lebanon Libya Middle East Muslims NATO Neocons North Korea Nuclear War Osama Bin Laden Pakistan Russia Saudi Arabia Syria Terrorism Turkey Ukraine World War I World War II 2006 Election 2008 Election 2010 Election 2012 Election 2024 Election Academia Afghan Opium Africa Aircraft Carriers Al Qaeda Algeria American Debt Angola Animal Rights Wackos Anthony Blinken Anthrax Anti-Semitism Arab Spring Arabs Assassinations Australia Balka Banking System Battle Of Algiers Benjamin Netanyahu Berlin Wall Bernie Sanders Bioweapons Boeing Boris Johnson Bosnia Brazil Brexit British Labour Party British Politics Burma Bush Administration Campaign Finance Canada Catalonia Central Asia Charlie Hebdo Chechnya China/America Chuck Hagel CIA Cold War Colombia Communism Conservative Movement Conspiracy Theories Covid Corruption Crimea Culture/Society Cyprus Death Penalty Debt Democracy Democratic Party Deregulation Disease Dominique Strauss-Kahn Donald Rumsfeld Eastern Europe Edward Snowden Emmanuel Macron England Environment Erdogan Ethiopia EU Europe European Right European Union Eurozone Fascism Financial Crisis Financial Debt First World War Food Free Trade Fukushima Gallipoli Genocide George W. Bush Georgia Germany Gorbachev Government Debt Government Spending Greece Guantanamo Gun Control Haiti Hezbollah Hillary Clinton Holocaust Hong Kong Houthis Hunting Imperial Presidency Imran Khan Indonesia Inflation Iosef Stalin Iosif Stalin Irish Islam Islamism Islamofascism Italy Jeffrey Epstein Jews John McCain Jonas Savimbi Kashmir Kazakhstan Keir Starmer KGL-9268 Khashoggi Kosovo Kurds Litvinenko Mali Marine Le Pen Massacre In Nice Mercenaries Michael Bloomberg Military Spending Mohammed Bin Salman Mossad Muammar Gaddafi Muslim Ban Myanmar Narendra Modi Nazi Germany Nelson Mandela Neoliberalism New York City Nicholas Sarkozy Nigeria Nuclear Weapons Obama Oil Palestinians Paris Attacks Pat Buchanan Pearl Harbor Peru Poland Political Correctness Prescription Drugs protest Putin Qassem Soleimani Qatar Race/Ethnicity Recep Tayyip Erdogan Red Sea Republican Party Republicans Robert Mueller Rohingya Ron Paul Russiagate Sarah Palin saudi Science Scotland Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Sikh Sisi Somalia South Africa South China Sea South Korea Soviet Union Spain Sudan Susan Rice Switzerland Taiwan Taliban The Middle East Tibet Tony Blair Torture Tunisia Unions United Arab Emirates US Capitol Storming 2021 USS Liberty Uyghurs Venezuela Vietnam War Vladimir Putin Vote Fraud Wagner Group Wall Street War Crimes War On Terror Wikileaks Winston Churchill World War III Xi Jinping Yasser Arafat Yemen
Nothing found
�TeasersEric Margolis Blogview

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library •ï¿½B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter

Why did President Joe Biden visit the African nation of Angola in the dwindling hours of his presidency? No other US president has visited this resource-rich southern African nation. Biden was just finishing presiding over the slaughter of over 50,000 Palestinians.

The real reason is likely money. It may have been a repeat of a shady deal with Ukraine which put Biden’s ne’er-do-well son, Hunter, on the board of a large Ukrainian energy company, Burisma. I almost bought a Ukrainian industrial company and saw the level of corruption involved.

As far as we know, the younger Biden got paid off handsomely; Biden senior did not receive funds from the Ukrainian firm. Still, the whole business has a smell of high-level corruption. Biden recently pardoned his son, shocking many Democrats.

But why Angola? I covered the civil war there in 2000. The Soviets and Cubans were waging a fierce bush war in southern Angola against South African expeditionary forces, quietly backed by CIA based in Kamina, Congo (today Zaire). Angolan anti-communist forces known as UNITA, led by the charismatic Jonas Savimbi, a close ally of South Africa, were battling the Marxist forces (known as MPLA).

It was a fascinating war fought in one of the world’s remotest places where wild animals competed with heavily armed guerilla bands. I was with Savimbi in his remote bush camp at Jamba and spent time with this remarkable man, whom I thought of as the most intelligent, inspiring leader of southern Africa.

Savimbi started off as a Moscow-based Marxist but later became a pro-western ideologue who sought to bring free markets to Angola, a rich nation with an undersized population.

Angola and its Cabinda Enclave were important producers of oil, always catnip to the Americans. In 2002, the US made an important oil deal with the Angolan communists. Washington no longer needed Savimbi and this UNITA movement. The Marxists of MPLA were suddenly America’s new best friends in post Cold War Africa.

That year, Gen. Savimbi was heading to the town of Moxico when his small convoy was ambushed. Savimbi was riddled with bullets and buried in the bush. The Angolan army claimed credit for killing Savimbi. This was false.

Savimbi was tracked and killed by an elite Israeli hit squad paid for by the US government. This fact was confirmed to me by a high-level American diplomat who was then in Angola. Washington no longer needed its old ally Savimbi and decided to get rid of him. As Henry Kissinger famously said, ‘it’s often more dangerous being America’s ally than its enemy.’

Watching Biden make nice to Angola’s Marxist rulers is revolting. Is there no honor or loyalty? Not, apparently, when it comes to oil. The US invasion of Afghanistan was sparked by Washington’s desire to secure oil pipelines south from Central Asia.

Savimbi himself was no angel. Brutalities in Angola’s 27-year long civil war were common. But Savimbi was head and shoulders above the other African leaders of his time. He was right to align himself with white-run South Africa to win the war and modernize Angola. Today, Angola is an utterly corrupt backwards mess. But, like Ukraine, it knew which American politicians and officials to buy. So why did the doddering Biden go all the way to Angola, so distant that planes had to refuel in the Cape Verde Islands to get there from the US? We wonder.

�
•ï¿½Category: Foreign Policy, History •ï¿½Tags: Angola, Assassinations, Jonas Savimbi�

What is clearly a joint US-Israeli plan to remake the Mideast map is now well underway. Changes will be seismic.

The Biden administration, by now almost totally controlled by pro-Israel neocons, is making its final major moves by loosing a Parthian shaft into the heart of the Mideast.

Syria – or what’s left of it – was divided up into zones – a third of the country with all its oil and gas fields is under the control of US military forces. Revenues from this oil and gas accounted for half of Syria’s income and paid its armed forces. Deprived of pay and munitions, the Syrian armed forces faded away, leaving the roads to Damascus open to Islamist forces, branded ‘terrorists’ by the west.

Israel collaborated closely. In two days alone its powerful air forces launched 480 attacks against Syrian military and strategic targets, including Syria’s tiny navy on the coast and major air bases. Israeli forces occupied a UN-sanctioned demilitarized zone on its northern border with Syria.

While western media and politicians waxed euphoric over the fall of former Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad, there was amnesia about the history of Syria’s nasty dictatorship. Not for me, of course, as a frequent visitor to the Assad’s frightening Syria.

The first time I visited Syria, there was a public hanging in front of my hotel. Later, I was arrested at the airport for carrying a hand-held dictaphone, described by guards as ‘a CIA radio device.’ Syria was even scarier than awful Iraq. Paranoia and suspicion were everywhere. But I also met with government officials and walked most of the Syrian side of the heavily militarized Golan Heights, later seized and annexed by Israel.

What our heavily biased media in the US and Britain don’t tell you is that the US has been trying to overthrow Syria’s different regimes since the 1950’s. I refer readers to a delightful book, ‘The Game of Nations,’ written by a former CIA agent based in Syria, Miles Copeland. He recounts how the US sought to order about successive Syrian regimes or overthrow them.

Syria’s worst years were under an Alawite air force general, Hafez al-Assad, who seized power in a 1971 coup. Until his death in 2000, he misruled Syria with an iron hand, battling attempts by Islamists, communists, Nasserites, Baathists, CIA, Britain’s MI6, France’s DGSE, Saudi intelligence, Turkey and Israel to unseat him. Syria suffered eight coups since 1946.

These efforts led to the brutal repressiveness of the Syrian regimes. I was in the city of Hama shortly after its Islamists revolted against the Assad regime. Tens of thousands were killed there.

Hafez Assad did America’s bidding when he sent troops to attack Iraq in 1991. The US long sent Arab captives to Syria to be tortured, particularly to link Iraq to non-existent nuclear weapons. Hafez’s oldest son Basil, who was slated to replace Hafez after his death in 2000, killed himself in a car crash. In true Mafia style, the Assad family forced the mild-mannered, Bashar, a British-trained ophthalmologist, to become president. His brutal brother Maher became the real power behind the throne.

Today, a third of Syria and Iraq are occupied by US forces. The mighty US air force rules the Mideast skies, along with its ally, Israel. When I was asked to the Pentagon to consult with the Air Force’s strategic planners, I was amazed to see many uniformed Israeli air force officers there. Qatar has become an aircraft carrier for the US Air Force. Jordan, Bahrain, Egypt and Kuwait all host powerful US forces.

Syria is crushed. Almost 50,000 Palestinians have been killed. Gaza is rubble. Israel is openly considering annexing more parts of Syria as well as slices of Lebanon. Israel’s hard expansionist right is cock-a-hoop over grabbing more land. The incoming Trump administration, flush with a $100 million gift from the casino magnates, Israeli-American Adelsons, and packed by Israel supporters, is giving Israel’s far right government carte blanche.

Will there be more targets? Possibly. One of the heroes of the Afghan War, Khalil Haqqani, was just murdered in Kabul, allegedly by an Islamic State suicide bomber. We don’t know who is really behind Islamic State, but the killing sounds a lot like some assassinations recently carried out by Israel’s intel agency, Mossad. Or was it delayed American revenge for its defeat in Afghanistan?

�

Syria is the mother of all mysteries. Even the Romans couldn’t figure out all the intrigues, plots, factions, coups and assassinations that were common there. Nor could they understand or deal with its hotbed of religions and weird sects.

Two thousand years later, not much has changed. This week, irregular forces of a former al-Qaida outfit named Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) appeared out of the countryside and seized Syria’s second most important city, Aleppo. Syria’s dormant 14-year-old civil war suddenly went critical. A few days later, the newly re-emergent Tahrir stormed the important Syrian city of Hama. In both cases, Syrian government forces of the ruling al-Assad family simply and inexplicably melted away after fighting the jihadists for 14 years.

I have a personal interest in this fight. In 2017, my Eric S. Margolis Foundation to protect animals joined the Four Paws group out of Vienna to mount the daring rescue of an entire zoo in Aleppo. The wretched animals there, bears, huge tigers, lions, dogs, and chimps had been trapped in the city’s private zoo by years of war. While they starved, the war between various jihadist factions and government troops raged as Aleppo, once Syria’s second city, was relentlessly reduced to rubble.

I also went to Hama while trying to visit the magnificent Crusader castle Krak des Chevaliers. There, the troops of President Hafez al-Assad (father of the current ruler Bashar,) were slugging it out with jihadists. Tens of thousands died in the fighting. Much of Hama was also reduced to ruins.

A sizeable portion of Syria’s 23 million people are Alawites, a mysterious breakaway Muslim sect from the Shias that many majority Sunni Muslims call heretics. Turkey’s minority Alevi Muslims are often confused with the Alawis, whom they brand as heretics. Poor Alawis flocked to the army where they eventually seized power, led by iron-fisted General Hafez al-Assad. Lebanon’s Druze, a mysterious mountain sect, are sometimes close to the Alawites. Maronite Christians also are highly influential, so too Druze and Armenians. Lebanon’s civil war, which I covered, ran from 1975 to 1990 until the Syrian Army ended the bloody conflict.

As a veteran war correspondent, it seems to me that at least many foreign powers are now backing HTS. The US and Israel have been trying to overthrow the Assad regimes since 2011. Israel wanted to cement its hold on the strategic Golan Heights that it captured from Syria. The US, which now occupies the oil producing NE third of Syria, has at least 9,000 troops there and, with Israel, helps the jihadists while publicly denouncing them.

Turkey, whose leader hates Assad, is also highly active in Syria and is most likely providing logistic support to HTS and other jihadist groups while also battling leftist Kurdish groups. Add Russian air units near Latakia, occasional help from Hezbollah groups and minor operations from small Iranian forces. In short, the evolving war in Syria looks increasingly like the awful, madhouse Thirty Year’s War in the 1600’s.

Interestingly, Israel’s far right coalition leaders keep referring to their ambition to ‘remake the face of the Mideast.’ This obviously refers to genocide in Gaza, the open-air prison camp for Palestinians driven in 1948 from their homes in what is today Galilee.  But Israel’s expansionist hard right also has its gaze fixed on Lebanon around the Litani River, the region’s last remaining free water source. It has also long coveted southern Syria, including Damascus, and overthrowing President Bashar al-Assad, a staunch supporter of the Palestinians. Remember, also, that large parts of Iraq are now occupied by US ground forces and air bases. So, a ‘new face’ of the Levant may be indeed emerging out of its current chaos.

�
•ï¿½Category: Foreign Policy •ï¿½Tags: Islamism, Israel/Palestine, Lebanon, Russia, Syria, The Middle East�

Pakistan is the world’s most important Muslim nation. It has 251 million people, nuclear weapons, the world’s sixth largest armed forces, intelligent, capable people, vast lands and major sources of water.

Yet Pakistan is a giant mess. Its current politics are a form of tribal warfare. Corruption engulfs almost everything. Disease, particularly diabetes, afflicts its long-suffering people. Polio is making return.

In recent years, Pakistan has suffered vast floods that have ravaged this nation. Equally menacing, next-door India remains an ever-present danger. Far-right Hindu extremists who are heavily represented in the current Modi government, keep talking about ‘reabsorbing’ Pakistan into ‘Mother India.’ This would have happened long ago except for Pakistan’s important nuclear arsenal and delivery systems.

India has also built an extensive nuclear arsenal, including three new submarines armed with intermediate-ranged nuclear missiles. This while people in India and Pakistan starve in the streets. And 60% of homes in India lack indoor plumbing.

The only institution in Pakistan that really works well is the armed forces. I have met many of its generals: most of them are intelligent, combat-ready officers. I knew Gen. Akhtar Abdur Rahman Khan, the ferocious chief of ISI intelligence service who led the anti-Soviet war in Afghanistan. He was murdered with the tough tank general Zia ul Haq who ruled Pakistan until his aircraft was sabotaged in 1988. Zia was a great Islamic warrior and man of steel. Many Pakistanis still believe he was assassinated by the US though there is no direct evidence.

I was friends with the late Benazir Bhutto, a fascinating and alluring woman who was murdered in 2007. I interviewed Gen. Pervez Musharraf in 1999, a man who seemed insignificant compared to Gen. Zia.

Benazir Bhutto, whose father Zulfikar was ordered hanged by Zia, used to tease me, ‘oh Eric, you love your Pakistani generals.’ I did. Most were fierce Pashtuns from the NW Frontier, born warriors. They first defeated the Soviet Union, then the mighty USA.

I also took to some of the Indian generals that I met. They and their Pakistani counterparts had none of the slipperiness and deceit of most politicians.

This brings me to the jailed, 51-year-old former cricket star, Imran Khan, Pakistan’s most popular political figure. Khan was jailed on fake charges over receiving gifts, when the ruling oligarchy feared Khan would win a landslide in elections. His wife was also thrown into prison.

Imran Khan’s chief enemies were the Sharif brothers, Shebhaz and Nawaz. Both were rich Punjabi industrialists often accused of egregious corruption. I came out of war-torn Afghanistan to interview Nawaz. He left me unimpressed, particularly after the time I spent with the fiery General Zia.

The United States and Britain, vocal champions of democracy, had nothing to say about the illegal imprisonment of Pakistan’s most popular democratic politician. It was clear they were supporting the Sharif brothers who were more amenable to America’s wishes and anti-Islamic policies. Pakistan’s influential army appears to be backing the Sharif regime.

This is interesting. Washington, which makes so much noise about democracy, is now supporting undemocratic regimes in Morocco, Tunisia, totalitarian Egypt, Jordan, Oman, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and the Gulf, not to mention Africa and Latin America. The CIA installed the current Ukrainian regimes. Efforts are again afoot to overthrow the Assad regime in Syria and, of course, to crush the life out of Palestinians.

What Washington really wants around the globe is total obedience, not real democracy. Pakistan is a sad example. President Pervez Musharraf told me that a senior State Department official warned him that if Pakistan did not allow US troops to use his nation to attack Taliban-ruled Afghanistan ‘we will bomb you back to the Stone Age.’

Great powers want to have their way. Democracy and common sense too often do not stand in the way. At least the new Trump administration in Washington is being brutally frank about its wants and needs unlike the honey-tongued hypocrites of the Biden years.

�
•ï¿½Category: Foreign Policy •ï¿½Tags: Democracy, Imran Khan, Muslims, Pakistan�

In 54 BC, Marcus Licinius Crassus, a rich, ambitious Roman businessman, got himself named governor of the wealthy province of Syria. Crassus had been sharing power in Rome with Pompey and Julius Caesar. Call him the Donald Trump of his day.

Crassus decided to invade neighboring Parthia, which is today Turkey and Iran. At the battle of Carrhae, retreating Persian horse archers loosed arrows over the back of their horses, giving us the literary term for a parting shot, `Parthian shaft.’

The moribund Biden administration loosed its own Parthian shaft this week by having Ukraine fire US-supplied ATACMS tactical missiles – with the help of US military technicians. A handful of British Storm Shadow and French Scalp air-launched missiles were also fired at Russia.

This was clearly an act of war between nuclear powers. Russia responded by launching one of its new hypersonic missiles with multiple warheads at Dnipro, Ukraine. The new Russian medium-ranged missile carried conventional, not nuclear, warheads. But the message was loud and clear: all western Europe was in range.

What, one must ask, was the lame duck Biden administration doing? Clearly trying to provoke an even larger war with Russia.

The outgoing administration is still filled with fanatical Russia-haters. In fact, the Pentagon, CIA, NSA and the rest of America’s 18 national security agencies were packed with dunderheads who think we are still fighting the Cold War and yearn to break up Russia into little Balkanized mini states such as happened to Yugoslavia.

So, the low IQ Biden administration has managed to get itself into a real, unwinnable war in Ukraine and the genocidal disaster in Gaza that also threatens to drag the US into war with Iran (former Parthia) while a huge conflict with China looms just over the geopolitical horizon. Meanwhile, Israel’s extreme right-wing government of fanatical settlers and nouveau rightists seems to be acquiring most of the levers of power in the US. And this is before the uber Israel-first Trump & Co. enters office.

Fools should not be allowed to play with matches. Biden’s foolish neocons can still cause a lot of mayhem before 20 January. Trump keeps vowing to uproot Washington’s deep-seated neocon ‘secret government’ that is the real power behind the scenes. But he is really part of this cabal and seems to share its views. Perhaps Trump will keep his word and begin to break the war party’s grip on power before they manage to ignite a nuclear war with Russia.

�

This week we observe the end of the `War to End All Wars,’ also known as World War I. The memorial week will be filled with the usual platitudes and patriotic guff designed to benefit the politicians who sent millions of young men to their deaths in this most stupid of all wars.

I consider World War I as the greatest tragedy to befall civilization. World War II killed more civilians but World War I killed or wounded more soldiers and it destroyed much of Europe after a century of glittering civilization.

We still feel the consequences of this brutal conflict today: the war in Ukraine, the butchery in Gaza, high tensions in the Balkans. WWI led to the collapse of the Russian Empire and the advent of Communism that killed millions in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. This included six million Ukrainians starved or shot by the Soviets.

The rapacious Treaty of Versailles led directly to the rise of National Socialism in Germany and, in part, to fascism in Italy. Europe’s Jews became the main target of hatred after being blamed for the crimes and mass murder caused by Communism.

The destruction of the Ottoman Empire and the Austro-Hungarian monarchy by France and Britain gave birth to many of today’s ethnic and political problems in the Mideast, North Africa and East Europe.

At least 17 million died in World War I, not counting China or India. This conflict was the direct result of Serbia’s efforts to draw Russia into war with Austria- Hungary, as well as Great Britain’s efforts to crush growing strategic rival Germany and France’s lust to reconquer Alsace Lorraine. Germany struck first in fear of being surrounded and crushed by Europe’s two leading military powers, France and Russia.

19h century Europe was the highwater mark of world civilization. Germany was the most socially progressive nation in Europe. Both Hitler and Stalin were determined to regain territories lost during World War I – not, as we are misinformed, to conquer the world. Highly effective British propaganda has convinced many that Germany was an aggressor that ignited the first world war. This untruth is believed even today.

Germany did terrible things, but so did the other allied powers. The horrors we are seeing today in Gaza and Lebanon resemble the fate of German and Japanese cities in WWII brought on by massive American and British firebombing of half of their cities. We still don’t know the truth about both world wars. They remain shrouded in propaganda. As is often said, history is the propaganda of the victors.

One major crime remains to be told: the deaths of millions of horses, donkeys and mules in both wars. In Britain, 128,800 horses were reported killed in the war. Millions of animals died in the world wars, beaten and lashed into hauling shells, guns and supplies or killed with ax-blows to their heads as easy food for the troops.

France’s cities and towns near the German border remain semi-ruins to this day. Plants barely grow in these poisoned border zones contaminated in the so-called ‘Great War’ between the murderous imperialist powers.

I have been a soldier and war correspondent. I have walked many of WWI’s battlefields and cemeteries. For me, there is nothing good to say about the ‘War to End All Wars.’ It was a vast butchery carried out by incompetent or stupid generals and even more loathsome politicians. Their successors are in office today. As the great Benjamin Franklin said, ‘no bad peace, no good wars.’

�

I was visiting Japan’s defense HQ about a decade ago. The official I was to interview was very late and left me cooling my heels in his office.

I kept walking about until I noticed a large diagram on his desk. I looked more closely and was amazed to discover that it was the plan for an atomic device. Japan was supposed to be free of any nuclear devices, both by the choice of its post-war US-installed government and Uncle Sam in Washington. Yet there was the bomb plan on the desk.

I wrote about this at the time – including in my Japanese newspaper column – and was treated by Japanese officials with ill-disguised fury. At least I was spared black-clad ninja assassins flying through my bedroom window at night. But my sushi lunches were cut off by angry Japanese officials.

What I wrote holds true ten years later: Japan – terribly vulnerable, facing bitterly hostile China and the two Koreas – needs nuclear weapons to defend itself. Saying this in today’s Japan is utter blasphemy, but someone must say it. Japan, one of the world’s most important economic powers, is naked before its enemies. Completely naked.

Half of Japan’s cities were turned to rubble or ashes by massive US bombing. In fact, more Japanese civilians were killed by US B-29 heavy bombers than by the two nuclear devices dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This massive bombing campaign was unnecessary: Japan’s industry and armed forces were barely operating due to a crushing naval and air blockade by US forces.

Today, half a century later, Japan is very wealthy thanks to its renowned manufacturing, innovation, and thrift. But it is surrounded by foes.

China has never forgiven Japan for the terrible massacres committed by the Imperial Army. The worst was in Nanjing where Japanese troops went on an orgy of killing. The same was true across China and Manchuria. Yes, Japan was brutal and steeped in blood. But so were Mao’s forces that may have killed or starved up to 30 million. Japan treated Korea, which it ruled for 35 years, as a labor colony. Koreans were treated in Japan as sub-humans and forced labor. Japanese scorned the proud, intelligent Koreans as inferiors and coolies.

Koreans, both North and South, have never forgiven Japan for its brutal ill-treatment. Luckily for Japan, the two Koreas have been too busy feuding with one another to focus their wrath on Japan. In fact, Japan is content with the two-Korea solution. A united Korea would prove a major military and economic rival.

Now, angry China is flexing its muscles. Over the past decade, China has modernized and expanded its military forces so they constitute a major strategic threat to Japan and ally Taiwan. China appears determined to pressure Taiwan into surrender – either by economic blockade or invasion.

The US Navy used to dismiss the threat of a Chinese invasion of Taiwan as ‘the million-man swim.’ That was a decade ago. Now, after modernization, China is almost ready to go to war over Taiwan. Japan and the US would inevitably get drawn into this conflict.

Japan’s armed forces are of very high quality, superbly trained and armed with modern weapons. But they would not be enough to defeat China in a regional war. The big question now is will the US be able to defeat China. Such a conflict would be hugely destructive and likely inconclusive and set both China and the US back a decade in their economic development.

A solution to this problem is for Japan to build its own nuclear arms to face down nuclear-armed China. Only three nuclear weapons from South or North Koreas could destroy Japan. Anti-missile systems will not rectify this dangerous imbalance. Japan has got to rearm and develop nuclear weapons – which it is a few screwdriver turns away from developing. South Korea was stopped by the US from producing nuclear weapons two decades ago.

For Japan, the nuclear writing is on the wall.

�

New York – I was with the Israeli army in 1982 when it invaded Lebanon and battled a new resistance militia, Hezbollah. Ten years later, I was in Afghanistan with a new Muslim resistance movement, Taliban.

Both groups have been demonized by western and Israeli media and governments as ‘terrorists,’ a meaningless but effective propaganda label that reduced both movements to the status of mad dogs and criminals. The term ‘terrorist’ implies that the object of this libel can have no legitimate political or moral rights. Dropping 2,000 lb bombs on apartment buildings, as Israel is doing in Gaza and Lebanon, is ‘anti-terrorism’ to the biased western media.

Today, many Americans have been fooled into believing that anyone who opposes US imperial policies abroad is a terrorist – a mad dog that must be destroyed on sight. In US media, Hezbollah, Hamas, Iranian are usually accompanied by the attached term ‘terrorist.’ This is the old Soviet practice of incessantly repeating an accusation until everyone believes it.

Hezbollah, or the Party of God, was founded in southern Lebanon at the end of its 15-year civil war, 1975-1990, as a local Shia militia to battle the Amal militia.

Hezbollah’s conflict with Israel began when Israeli armored units shot their way into the Lebanese market town of Nabatiyeh which was thronged by Shia celebrating the important holy Day of Ashura. Israeli forces dispersed the local Shia with gunfire. Some Shia shot back. Their struggle was on. Hezbollah’s stated objective was to advance the cause of Shia Islam, purge Lebanon of corruption and foreign influence and found a state for the hundreds of thousands of Palestinian refugees created when the new state of Israel was set up by Britain and the US.

Hezbollah refused to cooperate with the US. It became allied to Iran, and then to Syria just as the US and Israel sought to overthrow Syria’s Assad government. The so-called ‘conservative’ Arab regimes in Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf – all of them under Washington’s thumb – were terrified by Hezbollah and other Muslim reformist movements.

Israel targeted Hezbollah for special attention after its forces invaded Lebanon three times and were bloodied by effective resistance from Hezbollah fighters armed with improved infantry weapons. Hezbollah became the ‘bête noire’ in Washington which relied heavily on Israeli intelligence data for its views of the Mideast.

Now, Israel is trying to provoke Iran into a larger war and drag in the US as well. Iran’s nuclear facilities and its oil industry would be prime targets. Israel’s hard right is calling for the destruction of Iran’s industrial base and the overthrow of its Shia theocracy. This is pretty rich coming from a nation dominated by far-right religious parties that want to return Israel to its biblical borders.

The bottom line here is that Iran huffs and puffs but has amazingly little military capability after over half a century of punitive western sanctions. Tehran will keep on dodging Israeli provocations. But the next ones could be aimed at Iran’s Shia leadership. The low-IQ legislators who make up the US Congress will clap like trained seals when this happens.

In fact, watching the conflict between Iran and Israel reminds me vividly of the 19th century Zulu and Sudan Wars in which British troops used quick-fire artillery and maxim machine guns to mow down their hapless, spear-armed African opponents.

�
•ï¿½Category: Foreign Policy •ï¿½Tags: Hezbollah, Iran, Israel/Palestine�

Few people know that Lebanon was once part of Syria. It was detached from Syria by Imperial France and made into a nominally Maronite Christian nation. Sunni Muslims, Shia Muslims and Druzes were also encompassed in this newly engineered country of 6 million.

Then came 100,000 Palestinian refugees driven from their ancestral home in what is today Northern Israel. The admixture of these Palestinian refugees enflamed Lebanon’s traditional ferocious tribal rivalries. In 1975 they burst into major civil war between Maronite Christians and Muslims and Druzes, and clashes between Sunni and Shia militias. I arrived in Beirut in 1975, Day One of the civil war.

It was a horrible affaire, marked by hideous atrocities and massacres. France, the US, Syria and Israel openly mixed into Lebanon’s mayhem. I had never seen such raw hatred, sadism and barbarity. The conflict culminated into the massacres of thousands of Palestinian civilians – mostly women and children – at the Shatila and Sabra refugee camps by Christian militiamen aided by Israel.

After the civil war in 1990, Lebanon slumped into more tribal hostility and astounding corruption as this ancient Phoenicia nation fell apart. Nitrates carelessly stored in the port of Beirut blew up, killing hundreds. The national bank was looted.

Israel invaded in 1978, 1982 and 2006 in a failed effort to crush the Palestinian resistance, PLO. I was with the Israeli Army when it attacked southern Lebanon in 1982. Lebanese Sunni guerillas fought back, joined by fighters from a new Shia militia, Hezbollah.

Now the carnage has resumed with the Gaza bloodbath and Israel’s newly launched mass air attacks on southern Lebanon on 21-23 September that killed 558 civilians and wounded 1,835.

This massive attack followed Israel’s booby trapping of Hezbollah communications that killed and injured thousands of people, blinding many or blowing off their hands or genitals. This is pure Biblical ferocity.

Israel is relentlessly driving the Arab population from southern Lebanon. Ever since its founding in 1947-48, Israel’s right-wing has had its eyes on southern Lebanon. On its northern edge lies the Litani River, one of the last major water sources not in Israeli hands. Water is growing scarce everywhere in the Mideast. The Litani is a major prize, Israel has long coveted the two ancient seaports of Tyre and Sidon. Walking through them takes you back to the Bible. Some of Israel’s wilder right-wingers also claim southern Syria should be annexed by Israel. Why stop there? Others covet Iraq’s capitol, Baghdad, which had a large Jewish population before 1948.

Israel’s now ruling hardliners seem to have in mind a plan to drive Gaza’s Palestinians – themselves already refugees from Galilee and the Haifa region – into neighboring Jordan’s deserts. Up to 40% of Jordan’s people today are Palestinians driven from what became Israel.

With all this in mind, President Joe Biden’s UN speech last week was a symphony of hypocrisy. Biden and the US Congress provided Israel with well over $300 billion, with more coming as well as the latest US arms. The US supplies intelligence information and blocks efforts by the UN and many nations to force Israel to halt its destruction of Gaza. As Pat Buchanan said, ‘Congress has become Israeli-occupied territory.’

Israel’s usual salami tactics of grabbing small pieces of Arab land have worked very well. So, is Lebanon next? PM Benjamin Netanyahu will face court charges of bribery and malfeasance once this conflict ends, so he’s in no rush to bury the hatchet. The big powers who could make a difference have all been bought. Russia is at war. Only the powerful Israel could act to shut down this murderous conflict.

�
•ï¿½Category: Foreign Policy •ï¿½Tags: Gaza, Hezbollah, Israel Lobby, Israel/Palestine, Lebanon, War Crimes�

A furor has erupted in North America over reports that Russia will expand its armed forces of 1.32 million by a new 180,000 men. This will bring Russia close to China’s armed forces of about 2 million active soldiers.

The pro-war right in the US and Europe are trumpeting this increase as a prelude to a coming East-West war. ‘The Reds are Coming’ goes the old Cold War chorus.

We heard the same canard during WWII when clever British propaganda convinced most people that Hitler’s Germany was determined to conquer the world. In truth, Germany was trying to restore its pre-World War I borders.

Such was also the case with Stalin’s Soviet Union. Both imperial nations were torn apart after 1918 by the rapacious French and British imperialists, abetted by the Americans. Germany was panicked into entering World War I in 1914 because it believed it was about to be attacked in a two-front war by France, Britain and Russia.

Big numbers scare people. Russia may have what seems a large army today, but it is a vast nation of 17 million square kilometers with over 12 different time zones stretching from Eastern Europe to the frozen Barents Sea. Over 100 ethnic groups and religions are found in the vastness of Russia, today the last of the great 19th century empires (unless we count the United States) – counting break-away Ukraine.

Guarding the vast borders of this imperium and keeping it together requires very large numbers of soldiers and police. In WWII, the USSR fielded an astounding 34 million soldiers. The USA deployed 16 million, China at least 14 million. By comparison. today’s numbers of soldiers look puny.

Even so, Russia’s 1.32 million and its new 180,000 soldiers will strain the weak national economy. But, how then, was Stalin able to mobilize 34 million soldiers? One reason: today’s weapons cost one hell of a lot more than in the 1940’s.

Russia knows that in wartime the US plans to unleash its powerful Navy and Marine Corps against its Pacific provinces, notably Vladivostok. This distant region relies on two vulnerable rail lines, the Trans-Siberian and Baikal-Amur Mainlines, for contact with the rest of Russia. Just as interesting, when I was invited to Beijing by Chinese intelligence, I asked its senior officers ‘how long would it take the Chinese People’s Army to seize Vladivostok’ their reluctant answer was only ‘two days.’

Russia’s naval forces are unable to support one another, a huge strategic weakness shockingly demonstrated by the calamitous 1904 Russo-Japanese War. Today, much of Central Asia is independent. Moscow is hard-pressed to keep the Caucasus under control, as two Chechen Wars have shown.

Russia probably needs a million-plus army just to keep the lid on the vast imperium. Its current ‘military operation’ in break-away Ukraine needs many more troops. This conflict now extends to a 1,000 km long border. Such vastness is too much.

A decade ago, President Putin declared his intent to downsize Russia’s conventional forces and rely on nuclear weapons to defeat any foes. Few in the west paid any attention amid all the anti-Putin hysteria. But this is what happened. The Red Army was seriously reduced; its tank armies and air forces cut to the bone, in line with the rest of Europe. Then came the US-engineered coup in Kiev that resulted in the current conflict. The once mighty Red Army was revealed to be a paper tiger led by bumbling generals.

There was a time when all cringed before the power of the mighty Red Army. That was very long ago.

�
•ï¿½Category: Foreign Policy, History •ï¿½Tags: American Military, NATO, Russia, Ukraine�
Eric Margolis
About Eric Margolis

Eric S. Margolis is an award-winning, internationally syndicated columnist. His articles have appeared in the New York Times, the International Herald Tribune the Los Angeles Times, Times of London, the Gulf Times, the Khaleej Times, Nation – Pakistan, Hurriyet, – Turkey, Sun Times Malaysia and other news sites in Asia.

He is a regular contributor to The Huffington Post, Lew Rockwell. He appears as an expert on foreign affairs on CNN, BBC, France 2, France 24, Fox News, CTV and CBC.

His internet column www.ericmargolis.com reaches global readers on a daily basis.

As a war correspondent Margolis has covered conflicts in Angola, Namibia, South Africa, Mozambique, Sinai, Afghanistan, Kashmir, India, Pakistan, El Salvador and Nicaragua. He was among the first journalists to ever interview Libya’s Muammar Khadaffi and was among the first to be allowed access to KGB headquarters in Moscow.

A veteran of many conflicts in the Middle East, Margolis recently was featured in a special appearance on Britain’s Sky News TV as “the man who got it right†in his predictions about the dangerous risks and entanglements the US would face in Iraq.

A native New Yorker, he maintains residences in Toronto and New York, with frequent visits to Paris.

Personal Classics
“America’s strategic and economic interests in the Mideast and Muslim world are being threatened by the agony in...
Bin Laden is dead, but his strategy still bleeds the United States.
Egyptians revolted against American rule as well as Mubarak’s.
A menace grows from Bush’s Korean blind spot.
Far from being a model for a “liberated” Iraq, Afghanistan shows how the U.S. can get bogged down Soviet-style.