The two losses to Notre Dame really did it.

their ‘democratic rights’ need to be addressed.

Idiot. Their democratic rights� WERE addressed. They were permitted to cast their Vote in the national Referendum like everyone else.

someone with Verso’s warped thinking must be a jew

Inconvenient fact beneath the marketing hype: The vast majority of jobs in financial services are held by moms with unearned income from a spouse, an ex spouse or monthly welfare and child tax credits (up to $6,431 in the USA). Britain has this, too. Where was the Iron Lady when this anti-work rigging was designed? The unearned income covers their major household bills, making the low-as-you-go wages and part-time / temp hours palatable.

Most managers make enough to support a household….of one. A few managers (and owners) at the top make mega millions. Most of the jobs, however glorified due to the professional-looking buildings in which the mostly non-college-educated workforce labors—are not too “skilledâ€� since advanced software now does most of the work, giving the moms a lot of time off (for kids and mom-pampering) and a lot of work downtime for things like bulletin-board-decorating contests with a mommy/baby motif.

Good thing. They need to work part time when they are single-breadwinner womb producers. Otherwise, they go over the earned-income limits for the welfare programs.

Though trained in using a few more of their company’s software programs, the crony-parent middle managers, too, have lots of family-friendly time off for kids due to the crony hiring / retention of back-watching parents who just need to churn a few non-culture-fit hardworkers to keep the numbers up.

Their lax, family-focused work schedules are also granted due to the same automation that makes the vast majority of low-paying, voted-best-for-moms jobs so absenteeism-friendly. Even a lot of the managers’ work is done by computers, though not the entertainment planning for the umpteenth convention hotel jaunt: Chippendale dancers or clowns.

Due to their wombs and their age, moms at the bottom of the financial services food chain survive in the rigged system, created by the neoliberals globalists, but it is not at all clear that wiping out whole industries, like automaking, by shipping most of the jobs to countries with low-cost labor has reduced the price of wildly inflated major household expenses, like cars.

The brutal (and cynically sinister) replacement of citizen construction workers by waves of immigrants in single-breadwinner households, eligible for womb-productivity-based welfare that makes low, citizen-undercutting wages feasible for them, certainly has not driven down the cost of housing in the USA or elsewhere in the West.

Rent has increased by 72% over two decades in the USA. From watching Prime Minister’s Question Time, I’m pretty sure it’s high in Britain as well unless your rent is reduced by government to reward you for womb-productive sex as a citizen or a noncitizen.

Thriving? It depends on which side of the 80 / 20 wealth divide that you stand or how many layers of monthly welfare and refundable child tax credit checks hoist up your low pay.

Sensible and lucid account except for:

As for industry, while there are bright spot the entry into the EEC was the beginning of erosion of the British industry begining with cars.

I do keep on telling you that the rot set in with the Wilson Govt agreeing to the Kennedy Round of GATT ( 1968-72 )
Here are the figures for Import Penetration into the UK Car Market
1961 3%
1969 10%
1970 14%
1972 26.4%
1973 27.4%
1976 37.9%
1977 45.4%
1978 49.3%
PS JOHNSON The Structure of British Industry ( Granada 1980 )
Already by the early 1970s, the British Car Industry was in serious trouble. Until 1977, tariff barriers, as defined by the Kennedy Round, were still in place from EEC exports. They were treated the same as imports from other GATT states. But as you see import penetration in 1976 was nearly 2 in 5.

their ‘democratic rights’ need to be addressed.

Idiot. Their democratic rights” WERE addressed. They were permitted to cast their Vote in the national Referendum like everyone else.

The democratic result of that Referendum is completely irrelevant to the point at issue.

Some cities and people benefited from the EU, and maybe they are better educated people with higher iq and those special higher income associated genes that have recently been reported. But the majority of British people with a vote who bothered to vote were hurt by EU freedom of movement judging by the result. Perhaps they are worse human beings for it, but I am willing to bet that if all the people who did not bother to vote had voted, then the majority for Brexit would have been bigger.

As for industry, while there are bright spot the entry into the EEC was the beginning of erosion of the British industry begining with cars. No one can compete with the Germans in a single market and especially currency. They are running a subtle mercantilist policy to promote German exports, and Britain has a an increasingly dangerous reliance on the City, which the EU were eying for regulation. Withdrawing from the EU is not going to hurt the majority in Britain in the long run.

The British deep state, which currently opposes Brexit, once exhibited a great deal of control over the IRA.

I am sure those two facts have no bearing on the story you refer to.

English is not your first language.

“SAS has constituted fake IRA terrorists and is trying to incite civil war”

Idiotic comment. As far as our rulers are concerned, Irish troubles are more likely to be used to keep the UK in the EU.

The SAS are an accomplished body of men, but how likely is it that they have agents in place on the Creggan estate in Londonderry, able to roam the streets armed? I imagine everyone there knows everyone else and newcomers are pretty thoroughly checked out. This isn’t some anonymous estate in London.

Brexit is the UK’s plan to take Northern Ireland out of ECtHR jurisdiction and back into colonial status. The plan is proceeding: SAS has constituted fake IRA terrorists and is trying to incite civil war.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-northern-ireland-47985469

Your reference to SAAB is interesting. However, more relevant to the UK is Jaguar. In the late 80s, Jaguar, BMW, and Mercedes all had the same problem: dated designs and engineering. All 3 developed plans that were substantially the same, and required massive retooling and technological updating. The “glitch” was that there would low or no profit on shares for about 5 years, but in the following 5 years, it was predicted the profits would be more than doubled. BMW and Mercedes went to the stock exchanges with the plan, and it was enthusiastically supported. When Jaguar went to the LSE, it was panned and investors advised to sell. Where is Jaguar compared to BMW and Mercedes today, as opposed to where it was 30 years ago?
Short term thinking has always been a problem for investment in the UK. Thatcher and Major only exacerbated it.

The British government’s non-investment in Birmingham. Indifference or by design? What better way to complete the EU takeover than to encourage, through silence, approaching Brussels. Your example of May’s reversal only amplifies the point.
Most of the younger “Remainers” with whom I am acquainted, cannot separate the old EEC trading bloc from the current EU legislative octopus. Of course the moneymen behind the EEC come EU have the whole plan in a drawer somewhere, but only reveal it one page at a time, every now and then.

Off topic if I may:

On 3/20/19 Patick Cockburn posted a Brexit article on this site that was so different in factual content and inferences from the voluminous journalism on the subject that it seemed strangely unreal, He wrote: “How Brexit Could End 20 Years of Peace in Northern Ireland�.

I have been following Brexit from the perspective of a student of Western Civilization. I am intrigued with forces pull it apart and counter forces resisting. In all my reading, Cockburn’s article was the first I came across suggesting a return to the “Irish Wars� (if you will) resulting from Brexit.

My response after reading the article was essentially “HUH!� But, I have developed a great deal of respect for him based on years of reading his work on the Middle East. So I accepted that something was going on in N. Irealand visa vis Brexit, about which mainstream media was not reporting.

Today’s news demonstrates that Mr. Cockburn is as cogent an analysiss and reporter about British politics as he is of the Middle East.

“Journalist Killed By ‘New IRA’ During Riots In Northern Irelandâ€�
ZeroHedge https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-04-19/journalist-killed-new-ira-during-riots-northern-ireland

“Less� is irrelevant. They are there by the grace of the natives, so their use of emergency options should be somewhere around zero. Immigrants should be self-sufficient by definition.

Black and Pakistani/Bengali immigrants, the largest immigrant groups in Birmingham, in fact use welfare at a far higher rate than native British people while contributing less anyway.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/jul/26/black-minority-ethnic-britons-budget-george-osborne-benefit-cuts

… the city did not have at that time a single adequate hotel or restaurant in which to house and feed the potential investors it was hoping to attract.

What about in private homes? Aren’t the English known for their hospitality?

…though figures show that they draw on it less than the non-immigrant population.

“Less” is irrelevant. They are there by the grace of the natives, so their use of emergency options should be somewhere around zero. Immigrants should be self-sufficient by definition.

Some 44 per cent of the city population are first- or second-generation migrants and they will soon be in the majority.

If the town is a pit, why are they there at all? Shouldn’t immigrants be heading for successful places instead?

people broadly supportive of immigration underestimate the impact of raw economic competition between different low-income communities for limited opportunities in jobs and housing.

“Underestimate”? How about, “ignore altogether”?

Moreton, for instance, fears a slow slide from Britain as a European welfare state to something closer to the free-market American model.

Scandinavia has a sturdier welfare state and a freer market than does the UK. Or even America– compare the fate of Saab with the rest of GM.

And who says welfare has to be the business of the state? On low-wage immigration, the interests of welfare bureaucrats and the common people diverge more than anywhere else. And the state controls immigration.

The conflict of interest glares at us. But we refuse to see.

I love how all these post-industrial wastelands in the North and the Midlands are still blaming Maggie Thatcher.

Let’s grant that she could’ve helped, but didn’t. Let’s even grant that she deliberately made it worse.

What about the five other prime ministers since then?

What about 13 years of Labour, in particular?

And what about the thirty years of Labour councils in most of these boroughs?

I won’t defend the useless Tories, but let’s not allow useless Labour to wriggle off the hook. They could’ve fixed it themselves, but have been content to blame the Tories and do nothing instead.

And “nothing” is right: Birmingham’s renaissance, like in the rest of these towns, is entirely artificial: massive expansion of council and quasi-council jobs, expansion of the dole, expansion of immigration, a new paint job on the city centre. Just enough to make it look good on paper, or to impress visitors who pop in for a couple of days and marvel at the new luxury apartments on the riverfront. It’s all a sham.

Rather, a significant percent (48%) of “The People� do not want to leave the EU and their ‘democratic rights’ need to be addressed.

Leave means leave

“new foreign-owned automotive industries like Jaguar Land Rover”

What are you talking about? Jaguar and LR have been in the West Midlands since they were founded.

“the 1.1 million population today is younger than any similar city in Europe”

Indeed – more like a similar city in Pakistan. It’s not the Brits who are breeding, confident about the future. Take a walk from Handsworth in a loop round Villa Park to St Andrews then along the Coventry Road – it’s headscarves and pushchairs as far as you can see. The West Indian communities of Handsworth and Aston found out in the 2005 riots who owns the streets now.

“there are 80,000 students from the UK and abroad studying at high-prestige institutions such as Aston University, Birmingham City University and Birmingham University, the latter alone employing 10,000 people.”

And they’re all funded by insane quantities of student debt.

The ‘renaissance’ of Birmingham boils down to the fact that London prices are now so crazy that it makes more sense for banks to open hubs there – housing is cheaper and the rail links to London are good. Although again Cockburn doesn’t seem to be aware that the predecessor of HSBC, Midland Bank, was headquartered in Birmingham in ‘the bad old days’.

As for his choice of commentators on the failings of the native Brummies, I’ll make no comment other than to speculate that maybe the murders by Irish “nationalists” of 21 people, the maiming for life of a hundred, and the injuries of several hundred more aren’t yet quite forgotten in the town. In any event, the Irish population of places like Sparkbrook, where the seventies might have seen the odd collection “for Republican prisoners” in the Mermaid, have long since moved away, driven out by a Somali influx.

Yes, but the simple point was that if British taxpayers are paying more to the EU than they are receiving then the people of Birmingham actually received investment money from the British taxpayer, routed through Brussels, rather than from EU investment.

This article nicely illustrates the bias of those who whine about the will of “The People� being denied and “Democracy� being undermined by Theresa May’s incompetence and self-serving elites. Which is not to imply that she is competent or elites are not self-serving. Rather, a significant percent (48%) of “The People� do not want to leave the EU and their ‘democratic rights’ need to be addressed.

The difference between Referendum Democracy and Representative Democracy (as has be understood at least since Plato) is that in the ‘referendums form’ the ‘wants’ and ‘needs’ of the minority are ignored by the majority (aka “tyranny of the majority�), and in the ‘representative form’ the majority are obligated to negotiate a compromising decision between majority and minority.

What has happened in Parliament’s failure to consummate the Brexit referendum is the wants and needs of the 48% minority are being addressed through their elected representatives. ‘Democracy’ is not being undermined; rather, “Tyranny of the majorityâ€� is being denied!

Indeed

White flight continues apace in Birmingham.

1991: 78.5%/754,289 white
2001: 70.4%/687,406 white, 65.6%/641,345 white British
2011: 57.9%/621,636 white 53.1%/570,217 white British
2016: 52.5%/591,000 white, 48.3%/543,000 white British (ONS estimate)
2031: 33% white, 28% white British (UoM projection)

Birmingham schools

1998: 59.8% white (55.2% white British)
2008: 46.5% white (43.4% white British)
2018: 34.5% white (30.2% white British)

Oddly, not even even the white other/white non-British category of kids has grown unlike in many British cities. Not even the Poles or Romanians want anything to do with Birmingastan.

Seriously, wall the damn cesspit off & let it be the Pakistani governments problem. All that exists for British people in Birmingham nowadays are gangs of paedophile rapists and curry houses with hygiene issues. That, and Muslim driving standards, which have probably resulted in more deaths of whites than have all the murders of whites by ethnics put together since this damn mass immigration project got foisted onto us.

The only funding that should head to Birmingham should be in the form of re-location packages to get the remaining besieged white minority the hell out of there. Whatever EU funding has been doing for Birmingham since 1992, it hasnt stopped white natives being driven out, so frankly, I couldnt care less about it. It has a third world population, let it have a third world economy to match.

For an image of a typical street scene in Birmingham today, this is pretty much what to expect…
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4014030/Hate-preacher-dubbed-black-Jason-Bourne-repeatedly-asked-police-don-t-know-viral-video-rant.html
Mentally deficient roided up Afro-Carribbean, probable ex?-drug dealer muslim convert and his mystery meat (white…perhaps with gypsy admixture) obese wench.

I’ve been to Rotterdam, Cologne, Islamified parts of Paris, and none of them are anywhere near as depressing or inhospitable for whites as is Birmingham. Its a wart.

muh shekels

Cockburn is such a remoaner. It just came out today that the UK has overtaken the US as #1 investment hotspot in the world. So much for Project Fear.

In 50 years’ time Birmingham will be part of the Ummah

Talk about hyperbole

How much longer will this drunken Mick whinge about Britain?

The difference is that European funding processes are straightforward and transparent. Put forward a qualifying project and you will receive a known amount of funding on an assured timetable.

The UK government is extremely unreliable for infrastructure projects outside London. For example, Wales was awarded money for the electrification of the line from Cardiff to Swansea. May herself reversed the decision after it had been made. Another example has been the construction of nuclear power stations where the UK government has vacillated about the funding mechanism.

Central Birmingham has changed so much in the last 30 years. It now has ugly tubular steel barriers in the pedestrianised New Street, a sadly necessary precaution against jihadist truck drivers. At one end of the street, amplified Koranic recitations blast out from a stand offering free copies of the Koran. Many women wear the veil, something that was unknown in Britain 30 years ago, except among the few wealthy Arabs who spend the summer in Central London. Muslim candidates running for the Labour Party in Birmingham have committed electoral fraud involving postal votes on a scale that is unprecedented in living memory.

Yet the city is still mostly harmonious. It could still be saved by stopping mass immigration now; but no one in Central or Local Government wants to do this. In 50 years’ time Birmingham will be part of the Ummah. Whether or not Britain leaves the EU will make comparatively little difference to the city.

The refusal of the British state to provide funds as a catalyst for revival forced the council to look to Brussels for help

Birmingham had no choice but to look to Brussels for help because Brussels controls the European Regional Development Fund.

Over the following years, the city received huge amounts of funding from the EU

You seem to be unaware that Britain has always given more money to the EU than she has been given back by the EU. Your sentence should read, ‘Over the following years, the city received huge amounts of funding from the British taxpayer.’

Who cares when native British people will be within a few years (if they aren’t already) the minority in Birmingham?
Which do you think has a bigger effect on the lives of the local population?
Which one did the people living there choose in a referendum and which was forced upon them by politicians against their will?

https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/local-news/british-white-people-set-become-14830628

Yea i was thinking Hyde Park or Indian Hill. Typically predictable. I live in Mt Airy right next to the Green Township and Colerain Township lines. It is a mixed neighborhood within Cincinnati city limits. Everybody here, black, brown and white, are decent, hardworking and responsible homeowners. However just down Colerain Ave is Hawiian Terace and around the corner is Shady Mist Ln. Two section 8 houseing projects that account for 80-90% of the crime in Mt Airy (CPD district 5), especially violent crime. Murder, robbery, assualt, ect. Wonderful DWL social engeering at it's inevitable conclussion…

Black people need whites if there are disproportional amount of black people whites start moving out when whites move out so does the money. So the education system takes a hit , bussineses shut down property values plumit unemployment rises and destroys the entire city

Romans had running water 2000 years ago.

Blacks in Detroit can't figure out how to keep their basic services running today.

Cil YT! Cil YT! o noes, dis sheet ain working no moah. sumbody need to kum up in heah an fix dis sheet. Dey be owen us for da turrible, turrible slabbery.

Great work. It's just sad that the media and politicians and regular people can't openly talk about this because then we're labeled as racist or insensitive. They always want to blame others or the government for their misery when in fact it's their own doing. Black neighborhood…. drinking in public, littering, racing through shopping areas, speeding, disrespect toward emergency vehicles, wearing clothing way below waistline ( belts… hello) wait they even do that while wearing a belt, take their time crossing the street when they don't have the right of way. ( I think cause they're always looking for easy money or plain laziness. ) Roudy and obnoxious in public places. Using profanity in almost every other word they speak with no consideration of who is listening. Always listening to music advocating shooting, sex, drugs loudly in their car. Selling single cigarettes in public. (I've only seen this done in a black neighborhood in Baltimore.) no shirt in public( men). Liquor stores every where. Grocery stores carry lower quality food. (but this may be economic issue, poor). Poor upkeep of their home. always eating chicken wings! Lol ok the last one was just for fun. Now white neighborhoods….. just the opposite.

Last anonymous poster, why don't you join the current thread so we can discuss this matter further. I'm sure everyone would love to repent for their rayciss ways and atone for their sin. People like you make me sick. If you love them so much why don't you try living in downtown Detroit and see how long you can make it. I'm sure they'd all treat you with the utmost kindness and make you stay very enjoyable.

"Good point. It would be interesting to see some insights from within the upper echelons of the Western world."

Sociopaths with high self-esteem often are quite open about their plans.

The chief goal of the political Left is the extermination of white people and their culture, literally they won't be happy until you're gone. That's why the left has no problem importing retrograde Muslims. As long as they're anti-West and anti-white, as long as they contribute to humiliating whites and breeding them out of existence, they will be supported by the dominant Left. The idea that they are going to let you frustrate their main obsession with little laws or will allow you to starve the machine necessary to reach their goal is naive in the extreme. They've imported (with Stupid Party help) tens of millions of voters to ensure that you can't vote your way out. And there will never again be another conservative Supreme Court member, so the law won't help you either. You'll get nothing but slavery from the system in the future.

Californian: There will always be divisions among the sort of sick turds who are driven to invest all their energies in status displays. The sort of simple humanity that says I'm-an-engineer-and-you're-a-welder-who cares-let's-go-fishing is alien to them. They MUST despise others, and despising your near equals is much more rewarding than despising your obvious inferiors. That accounts for the liberal who hates the White workingman, yet always excuses the ghetto trash. That's why the top fraternity at Ivy League U sneers at the #2 fraternity. And that's why there are bitter rivalries within elite circles, the most status driven assholes of all.

We are nobodies trying to make sense of the King's doings up in his castle. We see more than the typical serf, but we're really just guessing.

Good point. It would be interesting to see some insights from within the upper echelons of the Western world.

Given that, I suspect that there are several factions at work, not all of whom hate us.

If so, then there is division among the elites which can be turned into something positive.

Californian: We are nobodies trying to make sense of the King's doings up in his castle. We see more than the typical serf, but we're really just guessing. As Voltaire wrote (paraphrased), "Following politics is like being an overnight guest and hearing a pair of silken slippers running up the stairs, followed by a pair of wooden clogs running down, and trying to make sense of it". No doubt there are insiders who read this blog and others, and howl with laughter at our mistaken interpretations.
Given that, I suspect that there are several factions at work, not all of whom hate us. Just as some power-graspers spew the multi-cult line, there are likely others who see the advantage to be had in exploiting White anger to overthrow the current regime. Let the pot boil over and make sure the military stands down, as did the Soviet army 20 years ago, then come in to sort out the wreckage.
Democracy is dead, for now. White autocracy is the best bet for the near future.

On the other hand…

It just may be that the ruling elites of the Western world are not acting rationally. It may be that they are so entranced with the short term advantages of their invade-the-world-invite-the-world strategy that they have lost sight of how it will turn out in the long run, namely their own ruin as well as that of the middle class. There were Roman politicos in the 5th century AD who saw in the barbarian invaders useful allies to be used as muscle against their opponents within the elite stratum of the time. But in the long run, those allies took over the entire show.

Another point to be considered: what if the reason behind globalist policies is that the elites have come to the conclusion that the great majority of first world peoples do not support them? And that all it will take is a mass awakening — ala the Arab Spring but among White peoples in North America and Europa — to bring the facade crashing down?

Just thinking out loud…

What do the elites plan to do with the masses of blacks and hispanics when the elites finally have the control that they have lusted for so long?

This is an interesting point, and one which I would like to see addressed directly to the elites, especially of the globalist variety. Speak "truth to power" and all that sort of thing.

One answer is that the view from the penthouse office is a heck of a lot different from that of the street level. Elites view the great mass of humanity as so much organic material to be manipulated or coerced as needed to maintain elite power.

Via globalism, they are getting what every elite class has wanted since the beginnings of civilization: domination of a world of demoralized quasi-serfs, people with no national consciousness who can be utilized as human capital or disposed of as necessary.

The exploding underclass of third worlders, both migrant and native born, is being used to undermine the middle class. Why? The middle class has been the main threat to the elites historically. Wreck the middle class and elite power is enhanced. To provide the justification, the elites buy off the opinion making class (media, academics, clergy, prestige bloggers) with lots of moneys and lots of foundations to push ideologies such as multicultism.

Look at South Africa. You end white-rule (which we told was a "crime" against humanity), put in black-majority-rule (ah, the victory of "democracy"), and you get a society which, for the average person, is disintegrating into crime, infrastructure collapse, inter-ethnic conflict. But for the elites, the new SA is a society in which resource extraction continues without any pesky protests over apartheid, and the white middle class can be demolished via AA and BEE. As for the black working class? Look at how the ANC government is today sending in the troops against the miners. ( http://mikesmithspoliticalcommentary.blogspot.com/ )

Then again, look at the situation in the first world. The American middle class is allowing itself to be dispossessed by outsourcing, mass third world migration, BRA, whatever. Seen much in the way of protest? A Pat Buchanan might be in the wings, but he is unable to garner mass support.

As for blacks, they might burn down an inner city now and then in protest over something, but this does not translate into serious opposition to the elites. Black generated crime and urban insurrections give elites the excuse to enhance state police powers (while shedding the occasional crocodile tear), and play off the underclass against whites.

Blacks who might lead a serious revolution are co-opted by AA into the system, or marginalized as crazy radicals. Even when blacks are displaced in their jobs and neighborhoods by illegal immigrants, they (or I should say, their leaders) take no political action to oppose this.

The vast majority of citizens do not have a clue. There was an abortive round of protests against globalization a decade or so ago, but that movement has long since been bought off. Even when entire cities are laid waste (ala Detroit), the bread & circuses keep it all in line. In Europa, there is a more direct line of repression, with dissenters being hauled before local inquisitions (ala Geert Wilders). All this is done in the ideological name of "civil rights," "universal humanity," and "kumbaya."

Brave New World, indeed…

"Little do these ethically compromised morons realize that their Black and Muslim pets will be at the ready to slit every pro-feminist, gay-loving, sexually liberated, gun hating throat in sight".

Yes but they won't be racist when doing so and that is the important point!

South Africa is now also a net importer of food.

Anon at 7:36 PM: The Left's hatred exceeds their judgement. Right now, killing off the evil White race is the most important thing. They won't get another chance. They'll deal with the aftermath later. It sounds absurd, but what else do you see?
It's not without precedent. In 1941, the Japanese government thought it could beat the United States, and occupy China at the same time. You see, the Japanese had a national myth, a narrative or story line that provided a context that explained things. "Japanese are the best people in the world, by far, and our Japanese spirit will triumph over all enemies." Kamikazes don't beat A-bombs.
All people have these narratives, in which they insert new facts as they come up. In the U.S. today, the multi-cult narrative is the only socially and politically acceptable point of view. There is no place for racial realism in this narrative, so there's no need to address our criticisms. "White people are bad, except we enlightened ones, and we will join with our friends the non-Whites and build a better world." We'll see if a smile will beat a mob of Darks.

"Little do these ethically compromised morons realize that their Black and Muslim pets will be at the ready to slit every pro-feminist, gay-loving, sexually liberated, gun hating throat in sight".

This is something that has always bewildered me. What do the elites plan to do with the masses of blacks and hispanics when the elites finally have the control that they have lusted for so long?

Do they expect them to magically vanish? I assume that they will try to starve them out, but there are a lot of blacks and browns out there, and they can wreak a lot of havoc before they die out. Who will defend the elites, if the whites have been bred out and wiped out? Do they really think that black, hispanic, and muslim soldiers and police forces will protect them?

Also, what will they do in future years when they need medical treatment? Rich people rarely go into difficult programs such as medicine, so when the white physicians have died or been killed off, where will they get their medical care?

Likewise, where will technological innovation come from? Do they intend to stay at a certain level of technological development and not progress anymore?

Maybe they are counting on the asians to help them in those departments. Good luck with that.

Bogolyubski: We need to stop confusing banksterism with capitalism or free-enterprise. They're not the same.

Thank goodness someone's paying attention. America's entire economy is slowly being strangled by an oligarchy who would sooner see this entire nation impoverished rather than give over an iota of control that they have manipulatively appropriated.

Zenster:
I'm still waiting for some sort of outcry by these bleeding heart bastards over Communist China's infiltration of sub-Saharan Africa. But wait! That's a Socialist entity engaging in the uplift of our poor brown brothers so everything must be just hunky-dory, no?

You'll be waiting an awfully long time in that case. I did actually read a BBC report about two years ago which mentioned the terrible conditions in Mugabeland and how the Chinese were abusing the poor negroids who worked the fields for them in a few of the agricultural enterprises which were set up. Want to take a wild guess as to whose fault it was that the Chinese were treating the groids so poorly? You guessed it …. YT! The Chinese, you see, learned the evil colonialist practices of the Brits and are now duplicating them there. So, there you have the very model of modern major journalism: It's still YT's fault – even after YT is dead and gone!

BTW, Mugabeland has largely been cleansed of YT thanks to the tireless groid thuggery of ZANU-PF and friends. The "breadbasket of Africa" can't feed itself any longer. But, the regime in Sodom-on-Potomac has been sending food, even before D'Won on d'downlow assumed the position. There's one thing you can always count on the Republicans for – the wrong thing. (The beatings will continue, etc.)

Certainly Whites can make ANY economic system work better. But even highly motivated religious zealots couldn't make the Christian communes work in the 19th century.

Yes, but those communes usually peacefully devolved, or evolved, into things that did work. The Shakers, of course, didn't have children and died out that way, but there are plenty of descendants, say, of the Oneida Community. Many were considered highly respectable in life although they were technically bastards.

@HaroldC:
YIH what you say is true. But I was only countering the point of arson in regards to insurance fraud. I made no mention implicitly or explicitly of any other consequence of burning down your own house. The potential other legal consequences are sufficiently obvious that they did not need mentioning.
That we are even debating this proves we are White.
The idea that we could be punished for even doing what we discuss (in a fictional context) is enough to discourage it.
As Detroit has proven Peopleâ„¢ aren't capable of 'thinking ahead', they just react regardless of the ramifications.

"It's about race, not economic systems."

Certainly Whites can make ANY economic system work better. But even highly motivated religious zealots couldn't make the Christian communes work in the 19th century.

Regarding the article in City Journal, I found this howler:

"The traditional grievance narrative doesn’t capture the imagination of entrepreneurial Nigerians in Houston or Somalis in Minneapolis."

Contrary to what the article claims, I would bet that the black return to the South is based upon an economy that can support public sector jobs and benefits. Plus "it jes too damn cold up here and it be lots more warmer down dare. And dey gots better b-ball teams.

In their lust for a deracinated West, Liberals cannot bring themselves to consider the implications of what deconstructed Western civilization really means. With their delusions of adequacy—a mutually shared trait with Blacks and Muslims—they greedily anticipate wresting the reins of power from their minority shock troops once the walls have come tumbling down.

Little do these ethically compromised morons realize that their Black and Muslim pets will be at the ready to slit every pro-feminist, gay-loving, sexually liberated, gun hating throat in sight.

But they also ornamented their windows and doors with burglar bars.

That's one hell of a strange way to describe a self-imposed jail cell. I can only suppose that Spencer regards a bike lock as "decorative".

There didn’t seem any sense trying to sell it. “There wasn’t anyone interested in buying it,� she said.

What, no Liberals eager to diversify their own lives by moving into a vibrant, culturally enriched neighborhood that they have struggled so hard to impose on everyone else? What gives?

Factor that out across the whole neighborhood, and you begin to realize the enormity of the financial impact that Black people have had on property value.

Far beyond any rhythmic or athletic prowess, first and foremost, Blacks excel at wealth vaporization.

Wealth has evaporated in Birmingham faster than a spilled glass of water in the hot Southern summer sun since the take-over of the city Black-political control.

Most telling of all is how they manage an almost magical process of direct sublimation whereby there is no intermediate phase of condensed value. Instead, with almost superluminal velocity, an item of value metamorphoses into worthless dreck at the slightest touch of a Black hand.

The concept of wealth creation is as foreign to Blacks as Einstein's theory of relativity. Black social capital cannot be broken down beyond the village level as only at that collective level is there adequate combined intelligence to achieve even marginal functionality. As individuals, Blacks are too contentious and lax for any significant progress to be made.

Sub-Saharan Africa is enduring proof of The Black Legacyâ„¢.

… any history after the victories of the Civil Rights movement cannot be debated or discussed, the merit of the rewarding of full legal protection to Black people (and the creation of Black-Run America) far outweigh any of the negative ramifications of ceding whole cities to Black control.

That is because, as with the majority of Leftist ideology, any perceived merit or value regarding its racial policies positively withers under the magnifying glass of honest debate or legitimate critical analysis.

The entire Snivel Rights Movementâ„¢ is a study in "Selective Universalism". Yes, you read that correctly, Selective Universalism. Who else do you think would be working the hardest to undermine Universal Human Rights? Certainly not our so-called Conservatives. Only Liberals are capable of the Olympic-class gymnastic contortions required to warp reality to such an extent. To wit:

The idea of universal human rights has become ever more obsolete writes Caroline Fourest for Perlentaucher (German text), and, ironically, Western liberals have been a key force in its dismantling. "At the United Nations, the states cite 'national circumstances' as grounds for making exceptions to the application of the universal declaration of human rights. In the name of anti-imperialism left-wing activists denigrate universalism as neo-colonialism."

There you have it, "exceptions to the application of the universal declaration of human rights". No "Conservative" alive could spew such nonsense and avoid being shouted off the stage. Yet, Liberals can get away with supporting tyranny and totalitarianism while dodging much deserved calumny in the name of thwarting "neo-colonialism".

I'm still waiting for some sort of outcry by these bleeding heart bastards over Communist China's infiltration of sub-Saharan Africa. But wait! That's a Socialist entity engaging in the uplift of our poor brown brothers so everything must be just hunky-dory, no?

What can we call this? White people abandoned Birmingham to Black majority rule, so perhaps we can call this "reverse colonialism".

Given the barely concealed worldwide genocide by Blacks against Whites, the term "White Flight" no longer applies. What we are faced with is a genuine diaspora which portends huge ramifications for this world's future.

[to be continued]

'hy is it that every slum in this country are in states controled by democrats'

we import more and more 3rd worlders…
USA is finished.
Sad but true.

slums = immigrants and blacks.

Decades ago, as a libty, I had a discussion with a Marxist in a record store. When in the course of discussion I said "free market" he immediately broke out laughing. I got mad of course. He said, "You don't get it. There IS no free market."

He was right. There isn't, not in the big scheme of things. Not in a world of fractional reserve banking, the world financial system as it is.

There is a big difference between "free enterprise" on a daily basis and capitalism, as such.

Capitalism and Marxism-Leninism, known as Communism, have one thing in common. They don't exist. Not in a pure form. They cannot and do not.

Pure capitalism is a world like Galt's Gulch in Malice Rosenbaum's second magnum opus,Atlas Shrugged. It's fictional. It can no more exist in reality than can the Starship Enterprise complete with Transporter and warp drive. Those things violate the real laws of physics as we know them.

Communists, when asked which countries were Communist, would answer-correctly-"None of them, at present". The USSR and its satellite states were never, by their own admission, Communist. They were Socialist states, Socialism being the transition state between 'bourgeois capitalism' and Communism, a state as imaginary as the Starship Enterprise, which in theory (their theory) would exist when the organs of the State would wither away because the New Communist Man would be self-governing and not need their 'assistance' in doing the right, i.e., the Communist thing.

So you have a state in between, supposedly, one imaginary state and another imaginary state.

You can not have a Communist state, we found out, from the experience of the Soviet Union. It imploded as soon as the global financial overlords decided that was the thing to do. The Reagan maneuvers, consisting of making the Saudis drop sweet light crude prices to cut off the Sovs' hard currency generators and instituting the SDI program which the Soviets thought meant ending "mutual assured destruction", provided the pretext.

In reality, SDI was "The Corbomite Maneuver" played in real life. Unlike warp drive, Transporters, or those time travel episodes, SDI does not violate fundamental laws of physics. It is, however, very much more technically challenging than at first thought: it had no chance of working in Reagan's lifetime and little of working in mine. (I'm not quite 50 yet.) I have talked with emigre Russian officers who knew that in the 1980s, and told that to the highest organs. They were ignored.

It's about race, not economic systems. Sweden and New Zealand were socialist, and as a consequence suffered economically, but both were highly livable, safe places,throughout most of their postwar history. It was not because of their governments or economic systems that black and brown nations were almost universally pestholes. On the contrary, it's the other way around.

Hey Kersey, check this out: City Journal.

Anon:
Which brings up a point that may possibly be relevant here. Back when I was a kid, you could put money in your savings account which would draw something like 5% interest per year. These days, the interest rates are a fraction of that. Once in America, saving money was a means to make money — you could double your savings every "X" number of years by letting your money draw interest. OK, there was inflation, but at least back then there was an impetus to save for the average American.

But that world is gone. What do people do to save these days? 401s? IRAs? The stock market? Investing in their own houses (we saw where that one went!)? Well…

Thing is, one aspect of the America we grew up is gone insofar as debt and not savings has become the primary impetus for growth.

You wonder if this can be connected to BRA. It's another means to knock the props out of the middle class and working poor.

Just thinking aloud here…

The "free-market economy" trumpeted by the Ministry of Truth is a lie (like everything else coming from them). Simply put, there is nothing free about a rigged market. If one person at the Monopoly board has a printer under his seat and can create money at any time with the touch of a button, which all other players are forced at gunpoint to accept as legitimate, that player (and his cronies) will completely control the game. We need to stop confusing banksterism with capitalism or free-enterprise. They're not the same.

That's why we see folks like John Corzine just walk away from brazenly stealing billions worth of customer accounts. That's why the vampire-squids can make crap loans to BRA and have their employees in the regime vote them taxpayer bailouts. The so-called "free-market" in the west is a complete myth. Apart from some small local-level activity, it is simply non-existent. Most in the country are in debt – having borrowed fake money from the friends of the cartel with the magic money-button, who are completely unaccountable.

Whiskey's point about the Republicans is yet another example of how completely pervasive and successful the scam is. Yes, a few Republicans are making promises about "holding the Fed [the unaccountable private banking cartel] accountable". Uh-huh. The same R-jerseys also made promises to abolish the Dept. of Edumacation, end welfare, affirmtive-action, abortion, repeal odious gun-control laws, repeal or derail Obamacare, and cut spending. They have done absolutely nothing on any of these promises over the decades. Just last week, while the Ministry of Truth was hyperventilating over the latest production of the Springtime for Allah grand Ummah tour in Libya, the Republican House of Representatives voted to continue the implementation of Obamacare. Among those voting "yes" was the überfiscalhawk Paul Ryan.

Whiskey is quite correct about the source of money which keeps BRA on the march. He's dead wrong about Republican intentions to actually do anything. There sole intention is to lie and deceive. Like their D-jersey team-mates, they serve those who designed, created and implemented the BRA campaign of genocide against YT. The D-jersey pol carries her BRA banner openly, while the R-jersey (to quote Cicero) "moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government, itself."

I don’t know why someone put different races on the planet earth. If the earth was homogeneous, white people would be out of the space now.

A lot of people here mention the section 8 program in relation to deteriorating neighborhoods. Has anyone looked into suing the housing departments on racial discrimination? Why is it that section 8 goes so overwhelmingly to Negroes. Why can't we sue the hsouing authprity to provide section 8 housing in propertion to the population. If a city is 50% white and 50% black, why does 97% of the section 8 go to blacks? We should sue the housing authorities so that half of the section 8 housing vouchers have to go to white people.

Whiskey, the Repukes may not like Bernanke because he is supposedly helping Obama with more easy money. But the GOP has absolutely no problem with the Federal Reserve System.

To borrow from Klinton, "Don't end it, mend it."

You can destroy your house with an axe. Glass, drywall, wooden trim, and wood siding if you have it, are fragile. Turn off the power and hack away at the wall switches and outlets. Nice flooring and any built in cabinets will need replacing after a few whacks, and you can remove all the visible plumbing with a pipe wrench.
It's your house and you can do what you want, but burning is a threat to your neighbors and will get you prison, especially if you burn for racist reasons.

YIH what you say is true. But I was only countering the point of arson in regards to insurance fraud. I made no mention implicitly or explicitly of any other consequence of burning down your own house. The potential other legal consequences are sufficiently obvious that they did not need mentioning.

At what point will Americans emulate what white South Africans have done (and continue to do) by getting the hell out of Dodge?

Majority-black and black-run societies INEVITABLY turn into cesspools of crime and poverty.

HaroldC said…

For all the people who are up in arms saying the man won't get away in burning down his house because it would be insurance fraud. The man didn't say anything about attempting to recover any insurance if he were to burn down his house.

You can burn your house down if you want to by dousing it with gasoline and lighting the match then put it on YouTube. But it's not insurance fraud if you don't make a claim.
Technically that's true, you're destroying your own property, but still not advised. The fire will still draw attention (someone's likely to call the Fire Dept.) and if the fire spreads beyond your property line the criminal charge of arson comes back into play. Or if where you live is under a 'burn ban' typical in FL the first half of the year. And quite likely CO is still under one due to fire situation out there.
If Ann Barnhardt torched her home she would likely get busted for arson for example.

why is it that every slum in this country are in states controled by democrats?

Urban sprawl "infill" homes and high rise townhouses/duplexes are coming to my self governing Bay Area suburb. The Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) Regional Housing Needs Determination of Northern California has determined that our little town is not doing its regional housing requirement part to facilitate and encourage development of diverse and affordable units to accommodate a diversity of citizens in terms of age, socio-economic background, disabilities, and other special needs.
If this were not so serious, it would be funny: the building contractor hired is a proven sleazebag with customer ripoff complaints published all over the Net. So much for quality assurance.
It seems a 99% white/Asian suburb with its high percentile STAR rating school, safe streets, low crime, uniquely constructed homes on large parcels, [not ticky-tacky cheek by jowl look-alikes], populated by successful professionals with intact families who participate in community and school functions is untenable to these globalist thugs whose lives are committed to destroying Western civilization as we know it.
Residents, mostly liberal Berkeley escapees who moved here for the schools, are for it. When I asked on our local blog, "are you ready for voucher holding neighbors?" I was pounced on as a raving maniac paranoid racist. Most, [except for a few realists] replied, "this village needs some diversity;", one sarcastically said, "God forbid any color should be seen on our streets."
This mind-boggling ignorance in spite of numerous "it never happens here" incidents of residential robberies, ATM shakedowns, small store hold-ups, purse snatchings, carjackings and thefts occurring in the last two years. Crimes all committed by roving, predatory black Richmond or Oakland thugs.
This is part of our crypto-Marxist community organizer's, "Sustainable Communities Inititive," disingenuously presented to the naive [university brainwashed DWL villagers on the board] in impenetrable buzz word jargon such as "sustainablility," "regional tax-base sharing," and the aforementioned, "regionalism."
Reality translation? A shakedown. Affluent suburban hard earned tax money will now spill into a bottomless common pot for redistribution to bankrupt, low, or non tax paying urban municipalities in this county. [High black population Richmond is almost entirely tax dependent, other communities sinking fast as blacks resettle in outer county ex-urbs].
As others have commented, we are not alone. The well funded construction, “regional planning grants," many of them in battleground states like Florida, Virginia, and Ohio, are poised to recommend more re distributive policies, as well as transportation and development plans, all designed to undercut America’s suburbs and redistribute your and my taxes. It's coming fast, folks, and most people don't see it.
Contractors have already broken ground on this project.
I have done my best at meetings and on our community blog to talk sense to these people, but it only pisses them off. They are blind.

For all the people who are up in arms saying the man won't get away in burning down his house because it would be insurance fraud. The man didn't say anything about attempting to recover any insurance if he were to burn down his house.

You can burn your house down if you want to by dousing it with gasoline and lighting the match then put it on YouTube. But it's not insurance fraud if you don't make a claim.

Hi S., you sound like a 'nice [Jewish?] gal.

USA is ruined by immigration, of anti white, anti Christians…

' Anonymous Sheila said…

If I lived in a majority White neighborhood, I would never consider selling to a black. As it is, however, I live in a majority Indian/Chinese neighborhood. When (with God's grace) we are in a position to move much farther out to a White area, I plan on selling to one of the Chicago blacks who are flooding this previously White, conservative suburb to disrupt the Asians' nice, little foreign enclave. There is one DWL divorcee and her children down the street (she's a big Obama supporter), but I would never recommend that a White move into this environment'…. SAD STORY

Additionally savers are punished by artificially low interest rates.

Which brings up a point that may possibly be relevant here. Back when I was a kid, you could put money in your savings account which would draw something like 5% interest per year. These days, the interest rates are a fraction of that. Once in America, saving money was a means to make money — you could double your savings every "X" number of years by letting your money draw interest. OK, there was inflation, but at least back then there was an impetus to save for the average American.

But that world is gone. What do people do to save these days? 401s? IRAs? The stock market? Investing in their own houses (we saw where that one went!)? Well…

Thing is, one aspect of the America we grew up is gone insofar as debt and not savings has become the primary impetus for growth.

You wonder if this can be connected to BRA. It's another means to knock the props out of the middle class and working poor.

Just thinking aloud here…

Anon that is not true, already the Fed's latest money drop from virtual helicopters has Congressional Republicans openly calling for single terms for Fed Chairs and audits. Policy is not made by declaration, Obama did not come out for gay marriage in 2008 facing election. Only to shore up support among SWPL in 2011.

The Fed has been extremely damaging for savers and for long-term investment. Among other things the dirt-cheap money and interest rates have produced the liquidity trap (people hoard cash, don't invest in long-term assets) which has killed in macro terms the IPO market for things like Facebook, major wealth generators. True it pumps up sugar-high stocks and commodities, and forces some money into short-term junk bonds for yield-chasing. But most people just sit on cash, figuring interest rates are going up long-term, since that new money has to go somewhere.

Even if you just froze in place Black rule in Birmingham, but eliminated welfare, block grants, and thus the subsidization of BRA, Black mayors would not have money to throw around. There would be no welfare checks every month. Women with five kids by different fathers would have to work, and place kids into orphanages or religious charities for care. Female hypergamy among Black women would be in check because the sexiness of today would cost food on the table tomorrow.

Birmingham would not be what it was. But it would be better than what it is.

Anonymous said…

Unfortunately, the "Tea Party" has been co-opted by the Republican party which has absolutely NO interest in getting rid of the Federal Reserve.
________________________________

One hope is that the Tea Party can resist and force the Repukes to behave in more accordance with their core beliefs.

I think the Tea Party is a great idea because if it a way to fulfill the goal of reducing the Federal Government which crushes BRA.

Unfortunately, the "Tea Party" has been co-opted by the Republican party which has absolutely NO interest in getting rid of the Federal Reserve.

"Upon further thought, I believe the only way to undo BRA is to kill the money flow."

Thread winner.

If the federal government was totally financed with taxes, there would be a massive revolt. So BRA gets its funding by selling bonds. These bonds are bought by the big money center banks. The Federal Reserve buys (creates money) these bonds from the banks which a) allows them to buy more bonds and b) the remaining bank funds are deposited with the Fed and serve as the base of a pyramid of fractional reserve lending. This is a sweetheart deal between the banks (which now have a backstop for making risky loans like mortgages for negroes) and gives BRA a market for its debt. This in turn allows the federal government to spend far more than it could under direct taxation. The money the Federal Reserve creates to buy the debt filters through the federal government and the financial system, stock market etc. until by the time it gets to the rest of us, it has bid up prices of goods (inflation).

Additionally savers are punished by artificially low interest rates. This removes an alternative to debt financing and gives the banking system a a choke hold on economic activity.

It is impossible to maintain a welfare state or an overseas empire without a central banking system. This is precisely why the Bank of England was formed.

People who want to get away with arson use greasy Lay's-style potato chips as kindling. They burn hot and leave nothing behind and are cheap and readily available. Set a fire with potato chips by an electrical outlet and the investigators will likely conclude that it was an electrical fire.

http://community.discovery.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/7501919888/m/2721918089

Albertosaurus: Blacks, being a grossly inferior race mentally, pose as much an obstacle to organized, determined Whites as coyotes do. Blacks will survive only as long as others will tolerate them. I've long felt that we should just grab whatever parts of Africa as we think we can use, before the Chinese or Hindus do it first. In 100 years, sub-Saharan Africa will have more giraffes than Blacks.

Upon further thought, I believe the only way to undo BRA is to kill the money flow.

BRA runs on a money flow, specifically large government. Kill that and you kill BRA, moreover you FORCE Blacks to be responsible for themselves, and while they won't be founding new Apple Computers, they can and have historically when depending upon themselves acted better. You can read Louis Armstrong's biography for how Blacks behaved in Segregated, non-Welfare America.

Kill the Federal Government, reduce it to a tenth of its size, let it do only defense, and a few other "national" things like NASA, the Superhighways, the FBI, R&D grants, and do those well, and you kill BRA.

Because suddenly BLACKS CANNOT MOVE. It takes money, mostly Welfare money from the Feds flowing down to the States and then to local governments in block grants to produce the social mobility. Portland, San Francisco, Seattle, and parts of San Diego have remained Whitopias because they are very expensive. Indeed SF got far less Black by gentrification, making the place too damn expensive to live. That's fine for wealthy gays and SWPL living off trust funds, but for ordinary White Americans that doesn't work for family formation.

Instead, simply cut off welfare. Require social and physical mobility to depend on: not having kids you cannot pay for yourself, deferred gratification and education/skills that PAY, constant saving, and strong family social networks. In short, how Whites lived circa say 1870-1965.

You cannot bring back Restrictive Covenants. That's never going to fly, among them elites/women/gays/SWPL find it ugly and "racist" and depressing. That won't fly. But killing BRA by killing government, arguing from a fiscal and liberty standpoint that a big government consumes all money from the middle class and is by definition tyrannical in every aspect of daily life, that is very powerful. It is the Tea Party argument and has as a major impact the cut off of money.

It takes money to move from Black dominated Birmingham to Seattle. If you want to save Seattle, and prevent it from becoming Detroit, you have to make it impossible for people without middle class incomes INDEPENDENT OF GOVERNMENT to move there.

Yes that will be a fight. But because less government = more money for White middle class, you suddenly have significant political allies — every taxpayer April 15th. This also includes sales taxes too btw. The argument being Government is a bad deal, Joe Average Middle Class gets ripped off and only the very poor and very rich get stuff. It has the virtue of being true, and giving people their money and freedom back.

America was in a sense founded on genocide. The Amerindians who occupied the continent were wiped out by smallpox. This wasn't intended genocide, but it turned out very well for the European settlers anyway.

Had they not conviently died out, we would have had much the same sort of problem with the Indians that we have now with blacks. We have been spared that experience by the smallpox virus. There may be a similar genocide of blacks coming.

I don't favor the genocide of blacks. I don't think the American government and people will ever endorse or even allow genocide, but we may not always be in charge.

It could happen this way.

China wants some lebensraum just as Japan did half a century ago. Japan looked south to the largely empty Autralian continent. However those lands were defended by well organized white people. China may very well prefer the softer target of South Africa.

South Africa has better soil than Australia. But more importantly it is undefended. China could invade South Africa with its available resources right now. In a decade, Africa will be weaker still and China stronger. China has plenty of its own people, it will not need the local black people. If China invades I expect the native blacks to die out in one way or another.

Russia under Putin or some Muslim nation might beat China to it. Egypt is in the news today. It is also seriously overpopulated. Some Iman need only to announce some previously overlooked Koranic passage that promised the faithful a destiny in Africa – and millions of poor Egyptians would sail south for the invasion. America could stop that of course but South Africa alone couldn't.

Blacks are not likely to hold South Africa much longer in an over populated world.

There is a black tide now inundating our cities. But that tide seems about to turn.

Albertosaurus

"With once exception – I'm not sellin' to no goddam colored. I'd put a torch to it first."

That's historical urban white ethnic language from the 1960's. I don't think it was ever meant to be taken literally.

YIH brings up some good points.

"With once exception – I'm not sellin' to no goddam colored. I'd put a torch to it first."

Well guess what, Mr. Homeowner? If you put it on the market and a black accepts your offer, and you back out, you get sued for breech of contract. They'll probably GIVE him your house as part of the settlement. There was a fellow in Arizona a few years back who allegedly shot at a couple of illegals, who then sued him. The court gave the illegals the guy's ranch.

And forget about arson. Most people aren't smart enough to do it and get away with it (and I include myself in that statement). The tipoff is when you show up to the emergency room with third degree burns over 60% of your body. Plus, people can tell a lie, but it takes a whole hell of a lot of work to get physical evidence to lie.

As YIH said, this White homeowner would be screwed. More than a cheerleader on prom night.

"…Buuuut that Section 8 check is guaranteed every month and minorities are less likely to complain about maintenance issues because they'd rather not be bothered by the landlord who might catch them doing or having something illegal. ''Real estate investors'' love 'White flight' because it makes more properties available to buy and rent out."

Ever see those hand-lettered signs on light poles that say "We Buy Houses!" and a phone number?" Well, I'm pretty sure that these are the "investors" YIH is talking about. Right now I have two houses that I'm pretty sure are Section 8 rental in my neighborhood. If I see two more in a year, I'm calling one of those numbers. My house needs repairs that would eat up my savings. If these clowns will buy it "as-is," and they give me enough to pay off the mortgage plus $1, I'm outta here.

That's assuming the ghettos don't explode between now and January, of course.

Whites will be back in these dumps because "UN Agenda 21" aka "sustainable development" will drive whites back. It's called "rural cleansing." Suburbs are "unsustainable" don't you know. So are roads, suburban single family homes, AC, meat and a host of other niceties. Did you know that it is "social injustice" for you, as a white person, to want to live in an environment away from crime laden cities? As the economy continues to be deliberately collapsed, people are being driven off their land, out of their "under-water" suburban homes into the arms of the green commies who will control EVERY aspect of your life. If you don't understand what is happening beyond race, it's time to get a clue. Race is just one of many tactics being used to advance this global agenda. Look up http://www.freedom advocates.org and start reading.

If I lived in a majority White neighborhood, I would never consider selling to a black. As it is, however, I live in a majority Indian/Chinese neighborhood. When (with God's grace) we are in a position to move much farther out to a White area, I plan on selling to one of the Chicago blacks who are flooding this previously White, conservative suburb to disrupt the Asians' nice, little foreign enclave. There is one DWL divorcee and her children down the street (she's a big Obama supporter), but I would never recommend that a White move into this environment.

Also housing co-ops.

Those are excellent ideas, HaroldC.  Something else that might work is a capitation tax, owed by the property owner.  Say, anyone over the age of 5 residing in the community for more than 30 days per year requires the payment of an annual fee.  This hits the Mexicans as well as the Blacks "staying" places, and you can bust them with additional fines for tax evasion.

When they don't pay, you foreclose for the unpaid taxes and fines and throw them out.

The thing about the law is that there is almost always a work around. Measures can be put in place that would in effect insure the racial integrity of white neighborhoods. Instead of a restriction that is on its face racially discriminatory other protections can be put in place.

Restrictions
Subdivisions are created by developers. The developers may or may not build the dwellings in the community. The developer however is almost always the 'Declarant' however in putting in place the restrictive covenants. The developer as declarant generally maintains control of the board of directors for the hoa so long as it owns a certain percentage of lots/units in the community. The board or its appointed officers or committees enforce the restrictive covenants. There is absolutely no prohibition on the developer reserving to itself or its successor (the hoa) the right of first refusal for every lot sold in the subdivision/community. A right of first refusal is an interest that requires an owner in the subdivision who intends to sell his lot/unit to first offer to sell to the holder of the right of first refusal. Any decent attorney who sees that there is a right of first refusal out there is going to require the holder of that right to put in writing that it has declined to exercise that right of first refusal. The right of first refusal is appurtenant to the real property and not a personal limitation to the first property owner. Protecting the racial integrity of white communities through the right of first refusal however will require however that it be exercised with the goal of protecting the communities racial integrity. Fortunately however protecting property values has a strong correlation with protecting the racial integrity of white communities.

Other techniques for maintaining the racial integrity of white communities can also be employed through the restrictive covenants. There would have to also be prohibitions on leasing any residence in the community or in the alternative very tight restrictions. This would prevent Section 8 obviously but would also prevent white owners from moving in Negroes or Hispanics as tenants. Perhaps the board would have to approve prospective tenants to insure compatibility with the neighborhood. Restrictions can also be drafted so stringently that Negroes or Hispanics are more apt to be in violation than whites. Limitation such as no junk cars, noise limitations. Strict enforcement of these limitations and assessing fines to the fullest extent possible would dissuade many undesirables from even considering buying into the community.

Fortunately the measures described above are not limited to new communities. Those neighborhoods not subject to any restrictions can form an association and put in place restrictions binding by all those agreeing to them. And likewise those restrictions would continue to be binding on all future property owners unless the property is released by the other property owners.

Private Clubs
Measures other than those employed through artful drafting and application of restrictive covenants surely exist. Private clubs are also another measure. It would function similarly to an association except that exclusion would not be through exercising or not exercising a right of first refusal but by admitting or not admitting members. Private clubs can discriminate currently. It would just be that one of the benefits of one of these clubs is also housing instead of merely restaurant, pool and golf course access.

Conclusion
I'm sure that there are other measures that can be employed to protect the integrity of white communities. I'm more familiar with HOAs because that is part of the area of law I practice.

Our neighborhood was once so nice and so clean
But blacks moved in and it's now dirty & obscene
We used to be safe and didn't have to lock our doors
But blacks moved in and we all know the score
Crime is way up and the neighborhoods gone down
With blacks everywhere acting like fools and behaving like clowns
There's muggers and thugs and drug dealers galore
with feral children runnnig wild
And even crack whores
Yes, the blacks are all ignorant, all loud and low class
And can't wait to chimp out and show that black ass
But you can't say a word or "You're a racist!" they'll scream
As they take a huge monster shit on your American Dream

my father was a fireman in the rust belt of america. he told me that in the projects in the early 60's when they went to fight fires in the projects they noticed how nice the grass was cut and this was before the maintenance dept did these things for the lazy spooks. he said there wasn't one broken window and at that time the firetruck and the firemen weren't seen as the enemy. he said the older spooks would ask the firemen if they needed help with the old ladders. so where and when did they start not chipping in? it must be when the gov't took over as the father figure of the house. when that happened the black male was deemed useless except for his lazy seed to reproduce. in those days before almighty welfare the black male was the bread winner and was needed in the home to bring home the bacon. in theory this is why there are more blacks in jail it's simply the fact that those black bitches need no longer the black male for that paycheck. so by L.B.Johnson giving the blacks the moon with white america's money. he has put more ngr's behind bars than any other person maybe in history. and these toads that seem to always need a leader haven't figured that out yet. and the real sad thing is this has trickeled down to the white woman lately. so in my theory when the black male isn't needed in the home anymore he has time to sell drugs and stay out all night and try to fuck white stupid women and all the other vices that you can think of. that's why it seems that most male spooks aren't grown up compaired to his white counter part. i guess when you aren't needed to feed your baby, and pay the rent you don't need to grow up and be responsible like our society expects. so by giving away the welfare most black males give away their freedom. i say shit if we weren't so f-ing broke in this country i'd say give them black mean bitches just a little more if it put more dumb ngr's behind bars and out of my back window or on the street corner pushing more drugs to those white kids. i guess it's damned if you do, and damned if you don't. godspeed!!! this just in ole barry soetoro(like most spooks) just got downgraded again. man leave a spook with a checkbook and bad things are gonna happen. we as a country should be so embarrassed that we are downgraded. now it's official we are all spooks according to the banks. damn those slave traders.

I've been catching up but this statement in the Gary Indiana thread caught my eye:
With once exception – I'm not sellin' to no goddam colored. I'd put a torch to it first.
If this anon White makes good his threat he would likely be screwed. Let's say for the sake of argument this house has Homeowner's Insurance on it guess what'll happen? They will investigate, and if it turns out to be arson (by necessity, insurance companies have gotten pretty good at sussing that out) he will quite likely face charges and if the insurance company can get him convicted they won't have to pay out.
So in reality he will either abandon (that's assuming he owns the property outright) or sell to the first White-appearing individual that can close the deal. And what will that ''real estate investor'' do? Live there? Surely you jest. He'll rent it out, and quite likely not to a White family. These days that's quite risky, White families might suddenly get unemployed and be unable to pay the rent then they have to go through the hassle and expense to evict and quite likely the hassle and expense to rehab the place for the next tenants.
Buuuut that Section 8 check is guaranteed every month and minorities are less likely to complain about maintenance issues because they'd rather not be bothered by the landlord who might catch them doing or having something illegal.
''Real estate investors'' love 'White flight' because it makes more properties available to buy and rent out.

"Cities are what people make of them…"

Exactly. Just like what I say to my DWL friends (many are converting to those who can see; keep hope alive, all):

"Why does Africa suck? Cause it's full of Africans. You expected differently in the cities here?"

First they laugh and call you a racist. Then they just laugh. Then they start to think.

hello, for those who remember i'm a french guy who has lived in villiers le bel where riot shoot the city in 2007. It's the same hosing problem there because in 30 yeras , blacks go from 1% to 60% of the people's city. So price housing in villiers up to 60% in 10 years compare to 130% up in france in general.
I live now at 40 kms south of paris and there are 99% white, it remembers the good old time..and there is no criminality, we can let our car open, my daughter is ins chool with only white students…so no private school..I pay i, gas for the car but i'm cool. The situation in france this summer has been very hot with civil war of 3 dayx in amiens, mulhouse and toulouse. In marseille, a membor near the mayor ask the state to send the army! Tehre will not be civil war in france but we will be like brazil i think and when islam will take the power we will have to take the boat, french people is too egoistic to make war and say islam go outside.

That is an excellent point. However, practically speaking Restrictive Covenants and Black political control are givens. For one thing, as Blacks are the core voting bloc of Democrats, they will never EVER agree to any ending of Restrictive Covenants.

What can be done then? In my view, a retreat into sprawling exurbs and cyberspace. The development of the web is the substitution of old cities with new associations on the internet.

Sprawling, mobile, ever changing exurbs and a permanence in cyberspace is all that is left. Yes, reverse colonialism. But the arrow of time only goes one way. Not the reverse.

Bogol: I don't care how well spoken Sweep The Leg is, I won't serve on Unamusement Park's Hate Submarine under any First Mate other than The Gratuitous French Girl.

Yet if I point back to the days when the White Racist Criminal who terrorized Black people or "DWL" ….(is that your code word for White Liberals? "Dishonest White Liberals".

But the thing is, we are not living in those days. The amount of black-on-white violence today is all out of proportion to the relative numbers of each race in America. And not only the violence, but other dysfunctions such as illegitimacy and school drop out rates. This is not a contest to see which race is the "worst." It's about survival. Why do you think there has been white flight? Because white people do not like blacks for the color of their skin? Do you seriously think that people are going to pull up their roots, sell their houses at a loss, relocate their families, all simply because of their neighbor's skin color? Doesn't it bother you that blacks, after half a century of every government program they have demanded being implemented, have such high rates of dysfunction? That even blacks are fleeing from black-run cities because of their crime and et etcetera?

A point which has been raised on various race realist websites is: how many black-run cities (or countries!) demonstrate economic expansion, low crime rates, and the honest provision of basic services?

Would you care to talk about black crime rates not only in America but in black-majority-rule South Africa?

SBPDL puts under the microscope cities such as Birmingham, Detroit, Newark, etc., all of which used to be functional municipalities under white majority rule. Under black rule, they seem to have collapsed. You can criticize segregation all you want, but in those days these cities seemed to be places where people actually wanted to bring up their families and have a future.

Now maybe SBPDL is wrong. Maybe you, or a DWL, could name the black-run cities in America which are functional. If you can, please do so.

"DWL" = Disingenuous White Liberals.

STL sez:

"…At this point about 3 of your sycophants step in and say…"

Aw, poor, poor negro. Kinda tough, isn't it, when all of your shuckin' an jivin' don't amount to more than a hill of sh*t, right?

I, and others, have tried to explain to you that you are not surrounded here by what you are used to in public life. Where everyone is commanded, under threat of job loss and life destroying laws, to put up with you and your TNB.

And the thing is, you know it. You are on vapors, kept going only by the few here who "don't really think he's a bad guy, gosh darn it!" Most of us, however, see you for what you are: the "nice" negro who moves in down the block, only to be followed by endless, dumded down BS.

Go away, stupid.

-Sweep the leg-

Thread winner hands down. Damn, you could be first mate on Unamusement's U-boat.

"What do you have to offer the people to come into the neighborhood?"
Anon said: Not much. Just a reasonable assurance they are not likely to be raped, robbed or murdered.

I always like to read live accounts of ideas discussed on SBPDL.

The Indianapolis Children's Museum in in the black ghetto (cheap land). The houses around the museum is blighted, the houses are mostly Section 8 and crumbling, and the community is calling for the museum to take more accountability for the local blacks (gibs me dat). We have mostly liquor stores, BBQ joints, barbers hops, beauty supply stores, corner variety stores, home daycare centers and prostitutes.

Under pressure, they have formed a "Quality of Life" campaign, where residents and community "experts" (black affirmative action museum hires and DWLs) get together and talk about how to attract residents and businesses to this area (all the while "keeping it real" as a black ghetto at all costs…).

Oh yes, and our area has been designated a food desert and a "Weed and Seed" district. We have a Community Action Center and a CDC. Note, white neighborhoods never need ANY of this nonsense in order to thrive. Hmmmm. Wonder what the difference is?

Here are some links to the plan, it is amusing to read for Those Who Can See. Although hard to believe, silly programs like this really do exist. They forget to factor in shootings, black crime, black degeneracy, failed black culture, blight caused by blacks, white flight, and fear of black crime:

http://www.childrensmuseum.org/mid-north-quality-of-life-plan-unveiled

and

http://www.midnorthplan.org/

and here is one celebrating a black BBQ pit in the area:

http://www.liscindianapolis.org/

Paul, I am reading Webster Griffin Tarpley's "Barack H. Obama, The Unauthorized Biography" just for fun.

I am finding that some of your ideas are very very similar to Tarpley's. Especially the idea of Corporate Collectivism. Tarpley talks about the the wealthy foundations and trust funds, including the Ford Foundation and its meddling in racial issues, funding race riots and the inner city Community Development Corporations (CDC), and for creating a festering sentiment of victimhood among blacks. Basically funding the entire black undertow and black degeneracy.

Have you read it yet?

"What do you have to offer the people to come into the neighborhood?"

Not much. Just a reasonable assurance they are not likely to be raped, robbed or murdered.

Allaway said …' Every place goes down and comes back up eventually.' Isn't that what we were told about Detroit 30 years ago, 20 years ago,10 years ago, yesterday? If only the govt spent money on these blighted areas, it would all turnaround. The govt spent billions on Detroit and look at it today.

It's like they're another species or something.

Whiskey said…
"The sad thing is that in Football, Black athletes are yes, better, on average, and by a lot not a little, than White athletes.

They are faster, by significant percentages, quicker, by significant percentages, and stronger, by significant percentages, than comparable White athletes. This has led to total Black dominance in certain areas: WR, CB, Safeties, Defensive Line, RB, etc. The only positions where skill, built up over practice, coaching, and middle class extra/paid coaching, beat pure athletic ability, is QB, Kicker, and Offensive Line.

To get the best athletes and win at either the pro or college level, you MUST have mostly Black athletes at the positions where they make a difference: spots where being faster and stronger and taller beat skill and game intelligence."

Whiskey, I always look forward to reading your posts. So much of what you have to offer about cultural insights and all is very pertinent, fresh and interesting.

Yet, your adoration for black athletic ability smells of Kool-Aid consumption on the level of the typical SEC fan.

The only proof of black athletic advantage that has been offered is the existence of a hormone that is present in 95% of blacks and only 85% of whites or so, and which most elite short-burst athletes have.

You said that blacks, by significant percentages are quicker and stronger than comparable white athletes. As a matter of fact, of all the linebackers at the 2011 NFL scouting combine, the white linebackers on average outperformed blacks in the 40 meter dash, vertical leap, and 225 lb bench press. Those were the only three tests in which all of the candidates competed.

The only valid argument one could make in black superiority would be in sprinting in a straight line over 100-200 meters. Even then, white athletes have popped up and still won medals at the Olympics. Christophe Leimetre's European record of 9.92 in the 100 M would have been the world record a mere 20 years ago. Yet now compared to then there are far fewer whites even at the youth level running sprints.

As far as jumping and leaping events go, white men took 6 of the 11 medals (three athletes tied for bronze in the high jump) in the three leaping events in the Olympics, the Long Jump, High Jump, and Triple Jump including gold in the long and high jumps.

I have never heard any reasonable argument or ever seen it demonstrated that black men are stronger the white men.

The problem with your opinion that college and pro football programs absolutely NEED black athletes is that the mere belief in black athletic superiority distorts any objective evaluation of prospective recruits. If you already believe blacks to be superior, you will select a black athlete over a white athlete who may have performed better. Skin color doesn't win games are score points, so coaches should actually be color blind in their scouting, yet it has been proven that they are anything but.

Toby Gerhart by all objective measures had better college stats and performed better at the 2010 NFL combine than Mark Ingram did at the 2011 Combine. Yet Gerhart was taken in the 2nd round in 2010 with half the rookie contract salary that Ingram received being selected in the 1st round in 2011. Even an anonymous NFL scout stated that Gerhart would have been a lock for the 1st round if only his skin color was black.

Even if you believe blacks to be superior on average, you should suspend that belief because you will overlook talented white players even at the skill positions of WR (Wes Welker, Jordy Nelson), RB(Toby Gerhart), D-line (Jared Allen, Adam Carriker), LB (Clay Matthews, James Laurinaitis, Ryan Kerrigan), S (Eric Weddle, Eric Smith), etc. These are just players who have succeeded despite the prevailing attitude that blacks are better at their positions. Even the position of Tight End is majority black in the NFL, yet some of the top at the position are white.

@ Convoluted feedback

"…At this point about 3 of your sycophants step in and say…"

Aw, poor, poor negro. Kinda tough, isn't it, when all of your shuckin' an jivin' don't amount to more than a hill of sh*t, right?

I, and others, have tried to explain to you that you are not surrounded here by what you are used to in public life. Where everyone is commanded, under threat of job loss and life destroying laws, to put up with you and your TNB.

And the thing is, you know it. You are on vapors, kept going only by the few here who "don't really think he's a bad guy, gosh darn it!" Most of us, however, see you for what you are: the "nice" negro who moves in down the block, only to be followed by endless, dumded down BS.

Go away, stupid.

-Sweep the leg-