');
The Unz Review •ï¿½An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library •ï¿½B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


�Remember My InformationWhy?
�Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Commenters to FollowHide Excerpts
By Authors Filter?
Alastair Crooke Ambrose Kane Anatoly Karlin Andrew Anglin Andrew Joyce Audacious Epigone Boyd D. Cathey C.J. Hopkins E. Michael Jones Eric Margolis Eric Striker Fred Reed Gilad Atzmon Godfree Roberts Gregory Hood Guillaume Durocher Ilana Mercer Israel Shamir James Kirkpatrick James Thompson Jared Taylor John Derbyshire Jonathan Cook Jung-Freud Karlin Community Kevin Barrett Kevin MacDonald Lance Welton Larry Romanoff Laurent Guyénot Linh Dinh Michael Hudson Mike Whitney Pat Buchanan Patrick Cockburn Paul Craig Roberts Paul Kersey Pepe Escobar Peter Frost Philip Giraldi Razib Khan Ron Unz Steve Sailer The Saker Tobias Langdon A. Graham A. J. Smuskiewicz A Southerner Academic Research Group UK Staff Adam Hochschild Aedon Cassiel Agha Hussain Ahmad Al Khaled Ahmet Öncü Alain De Benoist Alan Macleod Albemarle Man Alex Graham Alexander Cockburn Alexander Hart Alexander Jacob Alexander Wolfheze Alfred McCoy Alison Weir Allan Wall Allegra Harpootlian Amalric De Droevig Amr Abozeid Anand Gopal Anastasia Katz Andre Damon Andre Vltchek Andreas Canetti Andrei Martyanov Andrew Cockburn Andrew Fraser Andrew Hamilton Andrew J. Bacevich Andrew Napolitano Andrew S. Fischer Andy Kroll Angie Saxon Ann Jones Anna Tolstoyevskaya Anne Wilson Smith Anonymous Anonymous American Anonymous Attorney Anonymous Occidental Anthony Boehm Anthony Bryan Anthony DiMaggio Tony Hall Antiwar Staff Antonius Aquinas Antony C. Black Ariel Dorfman Arlie Russell Hochschild Arno Develay Arnold Isaacs Artem Zagorodnov Astra Taylor AudaciousEpigone Augustin Goland Austen Layard Ava Muhammad Aviva Chomsky Ayman Fadel Barbara Ehrenreich Barbara Garson Barbara Myers Barry Kissin Barry Lando Barton Cockey Beau Albrecht Belle Chesler Ben Fountain Ben Freeman Ben Sullivan Benjamin Villaroel Bernard M. Smith Beverly Gologorsky Bill Black Bill Moyers Blake Archer Williams Bob Dreyfuss Bonnie Faulkner Book Brad Griffin Bradley Moore Brenton Sanderson Brett Redmayne-Titley Brett Wilkins Brian Dew Brian McGlinchey Brian R. Wright Brittany Smith C.D. Corax Cara Marianna Carl Boggs Carl Horowitz Carolyn Yeager Cat McGuire Catherine Crump César Keller Chalmers Johnson Chanda Chisala Charles Bausman Charles Goodhart Charles Wood Charlie O'Neill Charlottesville Survivor Chase Madar Chauke Stephan Filho Chris Hedges Chris Roberts Chris Woltermann Christian Appy Christophe Dolbeau Christopher DeGroot Christopher Donovan Christopher Ketcham Chuck Spinney Civus Non Nequissimus CODOH Editors Coleen Rowley Colin Liddell Cooper Sterling Craig Murray Cynthia Chung D.F. Mulder Dahr Jamail Dakota Witness Dan E. Phillips Dan Roodt Dan Sanchez Daniel Barge Daniel McAdams Daniel Moscardi Daniel Vinyard Danny Sjursen Dave Chambers Dave Kranzler Dave Lindorff David Barsamian David Boyajian David Bromwich David Chibo David Chu David Gordon David Haggith David Irving David L. McNaron David Lorimer David Martin David North David Stockman David Vine David Walsh David William Pear David Yorkshire Dean Baker Declan Hayes Dennis Dale Dennis Saffran Diana Johnstone Diego Ramos Dilip Hiro Dirk Bezemer Dmitriy Kalyagin Donald Thoresen Alan Sabrosky Dr. Ejaz Akram Dr. Ridgely Abdul Mu’min Muhammad Dries Van Langenhove E. Frederick Stevens Eamonn Fingleton Ed Warner Edmund Connelly Eduardo Galeano Edward Curtin Edward Dutton Egbert Dijkstra Egor Kholmogorov Ehud Shapiro Ekaterina Blinova Ellen Brown Ellen Packer Ellison Lodge Emil Kirkegaard Emilio García Gómez Emma Goldman Enzo Porter Eric Draitser Eric Paulson Eric Peters Eric Rasmusen Eric Zuesse Erik Edstrom Erika Eichelberger Erin L. Thompson Eugene Gant Eugene Girin Eugene Kusmiak Eve Mykytyn F. Roger Devlin Fadi Abu Shammalah Fantine Gardinier Federale Fenster Fergus Hodgson Finian Cunningham The First Millennium Revisionist Fordham T. Smith Former Agent Forum Francis Goumain Frank Tipler Franklin Lamb Franklin Stahl Frida Berrigan Friedrich Zauner Gabriel Black Gary Corseri Gary Heavin Gary North Gary Younge Gene Tuttle George Albert George Bogdanich George Galloway George Koo George Mackenzie George Szamuely Georgianne Nienaber Gilbert Cavanaugh Gilbert Doctorow Giles Corey Glen K. Allen Glenn Greenwald A. Beaujean Agnostic Alex B. Amnestic Arcane Asher Bb Bbartlog Ben G Birch Barlow Canton ChairmanK Chrisg Coffee Mug Darth Quixote David David B David Boxenhorn DavidB Diana Dkane DMI Dobeln Duende Dylan Ericlien Fly Gcochran Godless Grady Herrick Jake & Kara Jason Collins Jason Malloy Jason�s Jeet Jemima Joel John Emerson John Quiggin JP Kele Kjmtchl Mark Martin Matoko Kusanagi Matt Matt McIntosh Michael Vassar Miko Ml Ole P-ter Piccolino Rosko Schizmatic Scorpius Suman TangoMan The Theresa Thorfinn Thrasymachus Wintz Gonzalo Lira Graham Seibert Grant M. Dahl Greg Grandin Greg Johnson Greg Klein Gregg Stanley Gregoire Chamayou Gregory Conte Gregory Wilpert Guest Admin Gunnar Alfredsson Gustavo Arellano Hank Johnson Hannah Appel Hans-Hermann Hoppe Hans Vogel Harri Honkanen Heiner Rindermann Henry Cockburn Hewitt E. Moore Hina Shamsi Howard Zinn Howe Abbot-Hiss Hua Bin Hubert Collins Hugh Kennedy Hugh McInnish Hugh Moriarty Hugo Dionísio Hunter DeRensis Hunter Wallace Huntley Haverstock Ian Fantom Ian Proud Ichabod Thornton Igor Shafarevich Ira Chernus Irmin Vinson Ivan Kesić J. Alfred Powell J.B. Clark J.D. Gore J. Ricardo Martins Jacek Szela Jack Antonio Jack Dalton Jack Kerwick Jack Krak Jack Rasmus Jack Ravenwood Jack Sen Jake Bowyer James Bovard James Carroll James Carson Harrington James Chang James Dunphy James Durso James Edwards James Fulford James Gillespie James Hanna James J. O'Meara James K. Galbraith James Karlsson James Lawrence James Petras Jane Lazarre Jane Weir Janice Kortkamp Jared S. Baumeister Jason C. Ditz Jason Cannon Jason Kessler Jay Stanley Jayant Bhandari JayMan Jean Bricmont Jean Marois Jean Ranc Jef Costello Jeff J. Brown Jeffrey Blankfort Jeffrey D. Sachs Jeffrey St. Clair Jen Marlowe Jeremiah Goulka Jeremy Cooper Jesse Mossman JHR Writers Jim Daniel Jim Fetzer Jim Goad Jim Kavanagh Jim Smith JoAnn Wypijewski Joe Dackman Joe Lauria Joel S. Hirschhorn Johannes Wahlstrom John W. Dower John Feffer John Fund John Gorman John Harrison Sims John Helmer John Hill John Huss John J. Mearsheimer John Jackson John Kiriakou John Macdonald John Morgan John Patterson John Leonard John Pilger John Q. Publius John Rand John Reid John Ryan John Scales Avery John Siman John Stauber John T. Kelly John Taylor John Titus John Tremain John V. Walsh John Wear John Williams Jon Else Jon Entine Jonathan Alan King Jonathan Anomaly Jonathan Revusky Jonathan Rooper Jonathan Sawyer Jonathan Schell Jordan Henderson Jordan Steiner Jose Alberto Nino Joseph Kay Joseph Kishore Joseph Sobran Josephus Tiberius Josh Neal Jeshurun Tsarfat Juan Cole Judith Coburn Julian Bradford Julian Macfarlane K.J. Noh Kacey Gunther Karel Van Wolferen Karen Greenberg Karl Haemers Karl Nemmersdorf Karl Thorburn Kees Van Der Pijl Keith Woods Kelley Vlahos Kenn Gividen Kenneth Vinther Kerry Bolton Kersasp D. Shekhdar Kevin Folta Kevin Michael Grace Kevin Rothrock Kevin Sullivan Kevin Zeese Kit Klarenberg Kshama Sawant Larry C. Johnson Laura Gottesdiener Laura Poitras Lawrence Erickson Lawrence G. Proulx Leo Hohmann Leonard C. Goodman Leonard R. Jaffee Liam Cosgrove Lidia Misnik Lilith Powell Linda Preston Lipton Matthews Liv Heide Logical Meme Lorraine Barlett Louis Farrakhan Lydia Brimelow M.G. Miles Mac Deford Maciej Pieczyński Mahmoud Khalil Maidhc O Cathail Malcolm Unwell Marco De Wit Marcus Alethia Marcus Apostate Marcus Cicero Marcus Devonshire Margaret Flowers Margot Metroland Marian Evans Mark Allen Mark Bratchikov-Pogrebisskiy Mark Crispin Miller Mark Danner Mark Engler Mark Gullick Mark H. Gaffney Mark Lu Mark O'Brien Mark Perry Mark Weber Marshall Yeats Martin Jay Martin K. O'Toole Martin Lichtmesz Martin Webster Martin Witkerk Mary Phagan-Kean Matt Cockerill Matt Parrott Mattea Kramer Matthew Caldwell Matthew Ehret Matthew Harwood Matthew Richer Matthew Stevenson Max Blumenthal Max Denken Max Jones Max North Max Parry Max West Maya Schenwar Merlin Miller Metallicman Michael A. Roberts Michael Averko Michael Gould-Wartofsky Michael Hoffman Michael Masterson Michael Quinn Michael Schwartz Michael T. Klare Michelle Malkin Miko Peled Mnar Muhawesh Moon Landing Skeptic Morgan Jones Morris V. De Camp Mr. Anti-Humbug Muhammed Abu Murray Polner N. Joseph Potts Nan Levinson Naomi Oreskes Nate Terani Nathan Cofnas Nathan Doyle Ned Stark Neil Kumar Nelson Rosit Niall McCrae Nicholas R. Jeelvy Nicholas Stix Nick Griffin Nick Kollerstrom Nick Turse Nicolás Palacios Navarro Nils Van Der Vegte Noam Chomsky NOI Research Group Nomi Prins Norman Finkelstein Norman Solomon OldMicrobiologist Oliver Boyd-Barrett Oliver Williams Oscar Grau P.J. Collins Pádraic O'Bannon Patrice Greanville Patrick Armstrong Patrick Cleburne Patrick Cloutier Patrick Lawrence Patrick Martin Patrick McDermott Patrick Whittle Paul Bennett Paul Cochrane Paul De Rooij Paul Edwards Paul Engler Paul Gottfried Paul Larudee Paul Mitchell Paul Nachman Paul Nehlen Paul Souvestre Paul Tripp Pedro De Alvarado Peter Baggins Ph.D. Peter Bradley Peter Brimelow Peter Gemma Peter Lee Peter Van Buren Philip Kraske Philip Weiss Pierre M. Sprey Pierre Simon Povl H. Riis-Knudsen Pratap Chatterjee Publius Decius Mus Qasem Soleimani Rachel Marsden Raches Radhika Desai Rajan Menon Ralph Nader Ralph Raico Ramin Mazaheri Ramziya Zaripova Ramzy Baroud Randy Shields Raul Diego Ray McGovern Rebecca Gordon Rebecca Solnit Reginald De Chantillon Rémi Tremblay Rev. Matthew Littlefield Ricardo Duchesne Richard Cook Richard Falk Richard Foley Richard Galustian Richard Houck Richard Hugus Richard Knight Richard Krushnic Richard McCulloch Richard Parker Richard Silverstein Richard Solomon Rick Shenkman Rick Sterling Rita Rozhkova Robert Baxter Robert Bonomo Robert Debrus Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Fisk Robert Hampton Robert Henderson Robert Inlakesh Robert LaFlamme Robert Lindsay Robert Lipsyte Robert Parry Robert Roth Robert S. Griffin Robert Scheer Robert Stark Robert Stevens Robert Trivers Robert Wallace Robert Weissberg Robin Eastman Abaya Roger Dooghy Rolo Slavskiy Romana Rubeo Romanized Visigoth Ron Paul Ronald N. Neff Rory Fanning RT Staff Ruuben Kaalep Ryan Andrews Ryan Dawson Sabri Öncü Salim Mansur Sam Dickson Sam Francis Sam Husseini Samuel Sequeira Sayed Hasan Scot Olmstead Scott Howard Scott Locklin Scott Ritter Servando Gonzalez Sharmine Narwani Sharmini Peries Sheldon Richman Sidney James Sietze Bosman Sigurd Kristensen Sinclair Jenkins Southfront Editor Spencer Davenport Spencer J. Quinn Stefan Karganovic Steffen A. Woll Stephanie Savell Stephen F. Cohen Stephen J. Rossi Stephen J. Sniegoski Stephen Paul Foster Sterling Anderson Steve Fraser Steve Keen Steve Penfield Steven Farron Steven Yates Subhankar Banerjee Susan Southard Sydney Schanberg Talia Mullin Tanya Golash-Boza Taxi Taylor McClain Taylor Young Ted O'Keefe Ted Rall The Crew The Zman Theodore A. Postol Thierry Meyssan Thomas A. Fudge Thomas Anderson Thomas Hales Thomas Dalton Thomas Ertl Thomas Frank Thomas Hales Thomas Jackson Thomas O. Meehan Thomas Steuben Thomas Zaja Thorsten J. Pattberg Tim Shorrock Tim Weiner Timothy Vorgenss Timur Fomenko Tingba Muhammad Todd E. Pierce Todd Gitlin Todd Miller Tom Engelhardt Tom Mysiewicz Tom Piatak Tom Suarez Tom Sunic Torin Murphy Tracy Rosenberg Travis LeBlanc Trevor Lynch Vernon Thorpe Virginia Dare Vito Klein Vladimir Brovkin Vladimir Putin Vladislav Krasnov Vox Day W. Patrick Lang Walt King Walter E. Block Warren Balogh Washington Watcher Washington Watcher II Wayne Allensworth Wei Ling Chua Wesley Muhammad White Man Faculty Whitney Webb Wilhelm Kriessmann Wilhem Ivorsson Will Jones Will Offensicht William Binney William DeBuys William Hartung William J. Astore Winslow T. Wheeler Wyatt Peterson Ximena Ortiz Yan Shen Yaroslav Podvolotskiy Yvonne Lorenzo Zhores Medvedev
Nothing found
By Topics/Categories Filter?
2020 Election Academia American Media American Military American Pravda Anti-Semitism Benjamin Netanyahu Black Crime Black Lives Matter Blacks Britain Censorship China China/America Conspiracy Theories Covid Culture/Society Donald Trump Economics Foreign Policy Gaza Genocide Hamas History Holocaust Ideology Immigration IQ Iran Israel Israel Lobby Israel/Palestine Jews Joe Biden NATO Nazi Germany Neocons Open Thread Political Correctness Race/Ethnicity Russia Science Ukraine Vladimir Putin World War II 汪精衛 100% Jussie-free Content 1984 2008 Election 2012 Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2022 Election 2024 Election 23andMe 9/11 Abortion Abraham Lincoln Abu Mehdi Muhandas Academy Awards Achievement Gap ACLU Acting White Adam Schiff Addiction ADL Admin Administration Admixture Adolf Hitler Advertising AfD Affective Empathy Affirmative Action Affordable Family Formation Afghanistan Africa African Americans African Genetics Africans Afrikaner Afrocentricism Age Age Of Malthusian Industrialism Agriculture AI AIPAC Air Force Aircraft Carriers Airlines Airports Al Jazeera Al Qaeda Al-Shifa Alain Soral Alan Clemmons Alan Dershowitz Albania Albert Einstein Albion's Seed Alcoholism Alejandro Mayorkas Alex Jones Alexander Dugin Alexander Vindman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Alexei Navalny Algeria Ali Dawabsheh Alien And Sedition Acts Alison Nathan Alt Right Altruism Amazon Amazon.com America America First American Civil War American Dream American History American Indians American Israel Public Affairs Committee American Jews American Left American Nations American Presidents American Prisons American Renaissance Amerindians Amish Amnesty Amnesty International Amos Hochstein Amy Klobuchar Amygdala Anarchism Ancient DNA Ancient Genetics Ancient Greece Ancient Rome Andrei Nekrasov Andrew Bacevich Andrew Sullivan Andrew Yang Anglo-America Anglo-imperialism Anglo-Saxons Anglos Anglosphere Angola Animal IQ Animal Rights Wackos Animals Ann Coulter Anne Frank Anthony Blinken Anthony Fauci Anthrax Anthropology Anti-Defamation League Anti-Gentilism Anti-Semites Anti-Vaccination Anti-Vaxx Anti-white Animus Antifa Antifeminism Antiquity Antiracism Antisemitism Antisemitism Awareness Act Antisocial Behavior Antizionism Antony Blinken Apartheid Apartheid Israel Apollo's Ascent Appalachia Apple Arab Christianity Arab Spring Arabs Archaeogenetics Archaeology Archaic DNA Architecture Arctic Arctic Sea Ice Melting Argentina Ariel Sharon Armageddon War Armenia Armenian Genocide Army Arnold Schwarzenegger Arnon Milchan Art Arthur Jensen Arthur Lichte Artificial Intelligence Arts/Letters Aryan Invasion Theory Aryans Aryeh Lightstone Ash Carter Ashkenazi Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Asian Quotas Asians Assassination Assassinations Assimilation Atheism Atlanta AUMF Auschwitz Australia Australian Aboriginals Automation Avril Haines Ayn Rand Azerbaijan Azov Brigade Babes And Hunks Baby Gap Balfour Declaration Balkans Balochistan Baltics Baltimore Riots Banjamin Netanyahu Banking Industry Banking System Banks #BanTheADL Barack Obama Baseball Statistics Bashar Al-Assad Basketball #BasketOfDeplorables BBC BDS BDS Movement Beauty Beethoven Behavior Genetics Behavioral Genetics Bela Belarus Belgium Belgrade Embassy Bombing Ben Cardin Ben Rhodes Ben Shapiro Ben Stiller Benny Gantz Bernard Henri-Levy Bernie Sanders Betsy DeVos Betty McCollum Bezalel Smotrich Bezalel Yoel Smotrich Biden BigPost Bilateral Relations Bilingual Education Bill Clinton Bill De Blasio Bill Gates Bill Kristol Bill Maher Bill Of Rights Billionaires Billy Graham Bioethics Biology Bioweapons Birmingham Birth Rate Bitcoin Black Community Black History Month Black Muslims Black Panthers Black People Black Slavery BlackLivesMatter Blackmail BlackRock Blake Masters Blank Slatism BLM Blog Blogging Blogosphere Blond Hair Blood Libel Blue Eyes Boasian Anthropology Boeing Boers Bolshevik Revolution Bolshevik Russia Books Boomers Border Wall Boris Johnson Bosnia Boycott Divest And Sanction Brain Drain Brain Scans Brain Size Brain Structure Brazil Bret Stephens Bretton Woods Brexit Brezhnev Bri Brian Mast BRICs Brighter Brains British Empire British Labour Party British Politics Buddhism Build The Wall Bulldog Bush Business Byzantine Caitlin Johnstone California Californication Camp Of The Saints Canada Cancer Candace Owens Capitalism Carlos Slim Caroline Glick Carroll Quigley Cars Carthaginians Catalonia Catholic Church Catholicism Catholics Cats Caucasus CCP CDC Ceasefire Cecil Rhodes Census Central Asia Central Intelligence Agency Chanda Chisala Chaos And Order Charles De Gaulle Charles Lindbergh Charles Manson Charles Murray Charles Schumer Charlie Hebdo Charlottesville ChatGPT Checheniest Chechen Of Them All Chechens Chechnya Chernobyl Chetty Chicago Chicagoization Chicken Hut Child Abuse Children Chile China Vietnam Chinese Chinese Communist Party Chinese Evolution Chinese IQ Chinese Language Christian Zionists Christianity Christmas Christopher Steele Christopher Wray Chuck Schumer CIA Civil Liberties Civil Rights Civil Rights Movement Civil War Civilization Clannishness Clash Of Civilizations Class Classical Antiquity Classical History Classical Music Clayton County Climate Climate Change Clint Eastwood Clintons Coal Coalition Of The Fringes Coen Brothers Cognitive Elitism Cognitive Science Cold Cold War Colin Kaepernick Colin Woodard College Admission College Football Colonialism Color Revolution Columbia University Columbus Comic Books Communism Computers Confederacy Confederate Flag Confucianism Congress Conquistador-American Conservatism Conservative Movement Conservatives Conspiracy Theory Constantinople Constitution Constitutional Theory Consumerism Controversial Book Convergence Core Article Corona Corporatism Corruption COTW Counterpunch Country Music Cousin Marriage Cover Story COVID-19 Craig Murray Creationism Crime Crimea Crispr Critical Race Theory Cruise Missiles Crusades Crying Among The Farmland Cryptocurrency Ctrl-Left Cuba Cuban Missile Crisis Cuckery Cuckservatism Cuckservative CUFI Cuisine Cultural Marxism Culture Culture War Curfew Czars Czech Republic DACA Daily Data Dump Dallas Shooting Damnatio Memoriae Dan Bilzarian Danny Danon Daren Acemoglu Darwinism Darya Dugina Data Data Analysis Dave Chappelle David Bazelon David Brog David Friedman David Frum David Irving David Lynch David Petraeus Davide Piffer Davos Death Of The West Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Deborah Lipstadt Debt Debt Jubilee Decadence Deep State DeepSeek Deficits Degeneracy Democracy Democratic Party Demograhics Demographic Transition Demographics Demography Denmark Dennis Ross Department Of Education Department Of Homeland Security Deplatforming Derek Chauvin Detroit Development Dick Cheney Diet Digital Yuan Dinesh D'Souza Discrimination Disease Disinformation Disney Disparate Impact Disraeli Dissent Dissidence Diversity Diversity Before Diversity Diversity Pokemon Points Divorce DNA Dogs Dollar Domestic Surveillance Domestic Terrorism Doomsday Clock Dostoevsky Doug Emhoff Doug Feith Dresden Drone War Drones Drug Laws Drugs Duterte Dysgenic Dystopia E. Michael Jones E. O. Wilson East Asia East Asian Exception East Asians East Turkestan Eastern Europe Ebrahim Raisi Economic Development Economic History Economic Sanctions Economy Ecuador Edmund Burke Edmund Burke Foundation Education Edward Snowden Effective Altruism Effortpost Efraim Zurofff Egor Kholmogorov Egypt Election 2016 Election 2018 Election 2020 Election Fraud Elections Electric Cars Eli Rosenbaum Elie Wiesel Eliot Cohen Eliot Engel Elise Stefanik Elites Elizabeth Holmes Elizabeth Warren Elliot Abrams Elliott Abrams Elon Musk Emigration Emmanuel Macron Emmett Till Employment Energy England Entertainment Environment Environmentalism Epidemiology Equality Erdogan Eretz Israel Eric Zemmour Ernest Hemingway Espionage Espionage Act Estonia Ethics Ethics And Morals Ethiopia Ethnic Cleansing Ethnic Nepotism Ethnicity Ethnocentricty EU Eugene Debs Eugenics Eurabia Eurasia Euro Europe European Genetics European Right European Union Europeans Eurozone Evolution Evolutionary Biology Evolutionary Genetics Evolutionary Psychology Existential Risks Eye Color Face Shape Facebook Faces Fake News False Flag Attack Family Fantasy FARA Farmers Fascism Fast Food FBI FDA FDD Federal Reserve Feminism Ferguson Ferguson Shooting Fermi Paradox Fertility Fertility Fertility Rates Film Finance Financial Bailout Financial Bubbles Financial Debt Finland Finn Baiting First Amendment FISA Fitness Flash Mobs Flight From White Floyd Riots 2020 Fluctuarius Argenteus Flynn Effect Food Football For Fun Forecasts Foreign Agents Registration Act Foreign Aid Foreign Policy Fourth Amendment Fox News France Francesca Albanese Frank Salter Frankfurt School Franklin D. Roosevelt Franz Boas Fraud Freakonomics Fred Kagan Free Market Free Speech Free Trade Freedom Of Speech Freedom French Revolution Friedrich Karl Berger Friends Of The Israel Defense Forces Frivolty Frontlash Furkan Dogan Future Futurism G20 Gambling Game Game Of Thrones Gavin McInnes Gavin Newsom Gay Germ Gay Marriage Gays/Lesbians GDP Gen Z Gender Gender And Sexuality Gender Equality Gender Reassignment Gene-Culture Coevolution Genealogy General Intelligence General Motors Generation Z Generational Gap Genes Genetic Diversity Genetic Engineering Genetic Load Genetic Pacification Genetics Genghis Khan Genocide Convention Genomics Gentrification Geography Geopolitics George Floyd George Galloway George Patton George Soros George Tenet George W. Bush Georgia Germans Germany Ghislaine Maxwell Gilad Atzmon Gina Peddy Giorgia Meloni Gladwell Glenn Greenwald Global Warming Globalism Globalization Globo-Homo God Gold Golf Gonzalo Lira Google Government Government Debt Government Overreach Government Spending Government Surveillance Government Waste Goyim Grant Smith Graphs Great Bifurcation Great Depression Great Leap Forward Great Powers Great Replacement Greece Greeks Greenland Greg Cochran Gregory Clark Gregory Cochran Greta Thunberg Grooming Group Selection GSS Guardian Guest Guilt Culture Gun Control Guns GWAS Gypsies H.R. McMaster H1-B Visas Haim Saban Hair Color Haiti Hajnal Line Halloween HammerHate Hannibal Procedure Happening Happiness Harvard Harvard University Harvey Weinstein Hassan Nasrallah Hate Crimes Fraud Hoax Hate Hoaxes Hate Speech Hbd Hbd Chick Health Health And Medicine Health Care Healthcare Hegira Height Henry Harpending Henry Kissinger Heredity Heritability Hezbollah High Speed Rail Hillary Clinton Hindu Caste System Hindus Hiroshima Hispanic Crime Hispanics Historical Genetics History Of Science Hitler HIV/AIDS Hoax Holland Hollywood Holocaust Denial Holocaust Deniers Holy Roman Empire Homelessness Homicide Homicide Rate Hominin Homomania Homosexuality Hong Kong Houellebecq Housing Houthis Howard Kohr Huawei Hubbert's Peak Huddled Masses Huey Newton Hug Thug Human Achievement Human Biodiversity Human Evolution Human Evolutionary Genetics Human Evolutionary Genomics Human Genetics Human Genomics Human Rights Human Rights Watch Humor Hungary Hunt For The Great White Defendant Hunter Biden Hunter-Gatherers I.F. Stone I.Q. I.Q. Genomics #IBelieveInHavenMonahan ICC Icj Ideas Identity Ideology And Worldview IDF Idiocracy Igbo Ilan Pappe Ilhan Omar Illegal Immigration Ilyushin IMF Impeachment Imperialism Imran Awan Inbreeding Income India Indian Indian IQ Indians Individualism Indo-Europeans Indonesia Inequality Inflation Intelligence Intelligence Agencies Intelligent Design International International Comparisons International Court Of Justice International Criminal Court International Relations Internet Interracial Marriage Interracism Intersectionality Intifada Intra-Racism Intraracism Invade Invite In Hock Invade The World Invite The World Iosef Stalin Iosif Stalin Iq And Wealth Iran Nuclear Agreement Iran Nuclear Program Iranian Nuclear Program Iraq Iraq War Ireland Irish Is Love Colorblind Isaac Herzog ISIS Islam Islamic Jihad Islamic State Islamism Islamophobia Isolationism Israel Bonds Israel Defense Force Israel Defense Forces Israel Separation Wall Israeli Occupation IT Italy Itamar Ben-Gvir It's Okay To Be White Ivanka Ivy League J Street Jacky Rosen Jair Bolsonaro Jake Sullivan Jake Tapper Jamal Khashoggi James Angleton James Clapper James Comey James Forrestal James Jeffrey James Mattis James Watson James Zogby Janet Yellen Janice Yellen Japan Jared Diamond Jared Kushner Jared Taylor Jason Greenblatt JASTA JCPOA JD Vance Jeb Bush Jeffrey Epstein Jeffrey Goldberg Jeffrey Sachs Jen Psaki Jennifer Rubin Jens Stoltenberg Jeremy Corbyn Jerry Seinfeld Jerusalem Jerusalem Post Jesuits Jesus Jesus Christ Jewish Genetics Jewish History Jewish Intellectuals Jewish Power Jewish Power Party Jewish Supremacism JFK Assassination JFK Jr. Jihadis Jill Stein Jimmy Carter Jingoism JINSA Joe Lieberman Joe Rogan John Bolton John Brennan John Derbyshire John F. Kennedy John Hagee John Kirby John Kiriakou John McCain John McLaughlin John Mearsheimer Joker Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Greenblatt Jonathan Pollard Jordan Peterson Joseph McCarthy Josh Gottheimer Josh Paul Journalism Judaism Judea Judge George Daniels Judicial System Julian Assange Jussie Smollett Justice Justin Trudeau Kaboom Kahanists Kaiser Wilhelm Kamala Harris Kamala On Her Knees Kanye West Karabakh War 2020 Karen Kwiatkowski Karine Jean-Pierre Kash Patel Kashmir Kata'ib Hezbollah Kay Bailey Hutchison Kazakhstan Keir Starmer Kenneth Marcus Kevin MacDonald Kevin McCarthy Kevin Williamson Khazars Kids Kim Jong Un Kinship Kkk KKKrazy Glue Of The Coalition Of The Fringes Knesset Kompromat Korea Korean War Kosovo Kris Kobach Kristi Noem Ku Klux Klan Kubrick Kurds Kushner Foundation Kyle Rittenhouse Kyrie Irving Language Laos Larry C. Johnson Late Obama Age Collapse Latin America Latinos Laura Loomer Law Lawfare LDNR Lead Poisoning Leahy Amendments Leahy Law Lebanon Lee Kuan Yew Leftism Lenin Leo Frank Leo Strauss Let's Talk About My Hair LGBT LGBTI Liberal Opposition Liberal Whites Liberalism Liberals Libertarianism Libya Lindsey Graham Linguistics Literacy Literature Lithuania Litvinenko Living Standards Liz Cheney Liz Truss Lloyd Austin Localism long-range-missile-defense Longevity Looting Lord Of The Rings Lorde Los Angeles Loudoun County Louis Farrakhan Love And Marriage Low-fat Lukashenko Lula Lyndon B Johnson Lyndon Johnson Madeleine Albright Mafia MAGA Magnitsky Act Malaysia Malaysian Airlines MH17 Manosphere Manufacturing Mao Zedong Map Marco Rubio Maria Butina Marijuana Marine Le Pen Marjorie Taylor Greene Mark Milley Mark Steyn Mark Warner Marriage Martin Luther King Martin Scorsese Marvel Marx Marxism Masculinity Mass Shootings Mate Choice Mathematics Matt Gaetz Max Boot Max Weber Maxine Waters Mayans McCain McCain/POW McDonald's Meat Media Media Bias Medicine Medieval Christianity Medieval Russia Mediterranean Diet Medvedev Megan McCain Meghan Markle Mein Obama MEK Mel Gibson Men With Gold Chains Meng Wanzhou Mental Health Mental Illness Mental Traits Meritocracy Merkel Merkel Youth Merkel's Boner Merrick Garland Mexico MH 17 MI-6 Michael Bloomberg Michael Collins PIper Michael Flynn Michael Hudson Michael Jackson Michael Lind Michael McFaul Michael Moore Michael Morell Michael Pompeo Michelle Goldberg Michelle Ma Belle Michelle Obama Microaggressions Middle Ages Middle East Migration Mike Huckabee Mike Johnson Mike Pence Mike Pompeo Mike Signer Mike Waltz Mikhael Gorbachev Miles Mathis Militarized Police Military Military Analysis Military Budget Military History Military Spending Military Technology Millennials Milner Group Minimum Wage Minneapolis Minorities Minsk Accords Miriam Adelson Miscegenation Miscellaneous Misdreavus Mishima Missile Defense Mitch McConnell Mitt Romney Mixed-Race MK-Ultra Mohammed Bin Salman Monarchy Mondoweiss Money Mongolia Mongols Monkeypox Monogamy Moon Landing Hoax Moon Landings Moore's Law Morality Mormonism Mormons Mortality Mortgage Moscow Mossad Movies Muhammad Multiculturalism Music Muslim Ban Muslims Mussolini NAEP Naftali Bennett Nakba NAMs Nancy Pelos Nancy Pelosi Narendra Modi NASA Nation Of Hate Nation Of Islam National Assessment Of Educational Progress National Debt National Endowment For Democracy National Review National Security Strategy National Socialism National Wealth Nationalism Native Americans Natural Gas Nature Vs. Nurture Navalny Affair Navy Standards Nazis Nazism Neandertals Neanderthals Near Abroad Negrolatry Nehru Neo-Nazis Neoconservatism Neoconservatives Neoliberalism Neolibs Neolithic Neoreaction Nesta Webster Netherlands Never Again Education Act New Cold War New Dark Age New Horizon Foundation New Silk Road New Tes New World Order New York New York City New York Times New Zealand New Zealand Shooting NFL Nicholas II Nicholas Wade Nick Eberstadt Nick Fuentes Nicolas Maduro Niger Nigeria Nike Nikki Haley NIMBY Nina Jankowicz No Fly Zone Noam Chomsky Nobel Prize Nord Stream Nord Stream Pipelines Nordics Norman Braman Norman Finkelstein North Africa North Korea Northern Ireland Northwest Europe Norway Novorossiya NSA NSO Group Nuclear Power Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear War Nuclear Weapons Nuremberg Nutrition NYPD Obama Obama Presidency Obamacare Obesity Obituary Obscured American Occam's Razor Occupy Wall Street October Surprise Oedipus Complex OFAC Oil Oil Industry Olav Scholz Old Testament Oliver Stone Olympics Open Borders OpenThread Opinion Poll Opioids Orban Organized Crime Orlando Shooting Orthodoxy Orwell Osama Bin Laden OTFI Ottoman Empire Our Soldiers Speak Out Of Africa Model Paganism Pakistan Pakistani Palestine Palestinians Palin Pam Bondi Panhandling Papacy Paper Review Parasite Burden Parenting Parenting Paris Attacks Partly Inbred Extended Family Pat Buchanan Pathogens Patriot Act Patriotism Paul Findley Paul Ryan Paul Singer Paul Wolfowitz Pavel Durov Pavel Grudinin Paypal Peak Oil Pearl Harbor Pedophilia Pentagon Personal Genomics Personality Pete Buttgieg Pete Hegseth Peter Frost Peter Thiel Peter Turchin Petro Poroshenko Pew Phil Rushton Philadelphia Philippines Philosophy Phoenicians Phyllis Randall Physiognomy Piers Morgan Pigmentation Pigs Piracy PISA Pizzagate POC Ascendancy Podcast Poetry Poland Police Police State Polio Political Correctness Makes You Stupid Political Dissolution Political Economy Politicians Politics Polling Pollution Polygamy Polygyny Pope Francis Population Population Genetics Population Growth Population Replacement Populism Porn Pornography Portland Portugal Portuguese Post-Apocalypse Poverty Power Pramila Jayapal PRC Prediction Prescription Drugs President Joe Biden Presidential Race '08 Presidential Race '12 Presidential Race '16 Presidential Race '20 Prince Andrew Prince Harry Princeton University Priti Patel Privacy Privatization Progressives Propaganda Prostitution protest Protestantism Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion Proud Boys Psychology Psychometrics Psychopathy Public Health Public Schools Puerto Rico Puritans Putin Putin Derangement Syndrome QAnon Qassem Soleimani Qatar Quantitative Genetics Quebec Quiet Skies Quincy Institute R2P Race Race And Crime Race And Genomics Race And Iq Race And Religion Race/Crime Race Denialism Race/IQ Race Riots Rachel Corrie Racial Purism Racial Reality Racialism Racism Rafah Raj Shah Rand Paul Randy Fine Rap Music Rape Rashida Tlaib Rationality Ray McGovern Raymond Chandler Razib Khan Real Estate RealWorld Recep Tayyip Erdogan Red Sea Refugee Crisis #refugeeswelcome Religion Religion And Philosophy Rentier Reparations Reprint Republican Party Republicans Review Revisionism Rex Tillerson RFK Assassination Ricci Richard Dawkins Richard Goldberg Richard Grenell Richard Haas Richard Haass Richard Lewontin Richard Lynn Richard Nixon Rightwing Cinema Riots R/k Theory RMAX Robert A. Heinlein Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert Ford Robert Kagan Robert Kraft Robert Maxwell Robert McNamara Robert Mueller Robert O'Brien Robert Reich Robots Rock Music Roe Vs. Wade Roger Waters Rolling Stone Roman Empire Romania Romanticism Rome Ron DeSantis Ron Paul Ron Unz Ronald Reagan Rotherham Rothschilds RT International Rudy Giuliani Rush Limbaugh Russiagate Russian Demography Russian Elections 2018 Russian History Russian Media Russian Military Russian Nationalism Russian Occupation Government Russian Orthodox Church Russian Reaction Russians Russophobes Russophobia Russotriumph Ruth Bader Ginsburg Rwanda Ryan Dawson Sabrina Rubin Erdely Sacha Baron Cohen Sacklers Sailer Strategy Sailer's First Law Of Female Journalism Saint Peter Tear Down This Gate! Saint-Petersburg Salman Rushie Salt Sam Altman Sam Bankman-Fried Sam Francis Samantha Power Samson Option San Bernadino Massacre Sandy Hook Sapir-Whorf SAT Satanic Age Satanism Saudi Arabia Scandal Science Denialism Science Fiction Scooter Libby Scotland Scott Ritter Scrabble Sean Hannity Seattle Secession Self Determination Self Indulgence Semites Serbia Sergei Lavrov Sergei Skripal Sergey Glazyev Seth Rich Sex Sex Differences Sexism Sexual Harassment Sexual Selection Sexuality Seymour Hersh Shai Masot Shakespeare Shame Culture Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Sheldon Adelson Shias And Sunnis Shimon Arad Shireen Abu Akleh Shmuley Boteach Shoah Shorts And Funnies Shoshana Bryen Shulamit Aloni Shurat HaDin Sigal Mandelker Sigar Pearl Mandelker Sigmund Freud Silicon Valley Singapore Single Men Single Women Sinotriumph Six Day War Sixties SJWs Skin Color Slavery Slavery Reparations Slavoj Zizek Slavs Smart Fraction Social Justice Warriors Social Media Social Science Socialism Society Sociobiology Sociology Sodium Solzhenitsyn Somalia Sotomayor South Africa South Asia South China Sea South Korea Southeast Asia Soviet History Soviet Union Sovok Space Space Exploration Space Program Spain Spanish Spanish River High School SPLC Sport Sports Srebrenica St Petersburg International Economic Forum Stabby Somali Staffan Stage Stalinism Standardized Tests Star Trek Star Wars Starbucks Starvation Comparisons State Department Statistics Statue Of Liberty Steny Hoyer Stephen Cohen Stephen Harper Stephen Jay Gould Stereotypes Steroids Steve Bannon Steve Sailer Steve Witkoff Steven Pinker Strait Of Hormuz Strategic Ambiguity Stuart Levey Stuart Seldowitz Student Debt Stuff White People Like Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africans Subhas Chandra Bose Subprime Mortgage Crisis Suburb Suella Braverman Sugar Suicide Superintelligence Supreme Court Surveillance Susan Glasser Svidomy Sweden Switzerland Symington Amendment Syria Syrian Civil War Ta-Nehisi Coates Taiwan Take Action Taliban Talmud Tariff Tatars Taxation Taxes Tea Party Technical Considerations Technology Ted Cruz Telegram Television Terrorism Terrorists Terry McAuliffe Tesla Testing Testosterone Tests Texas THAAD Thailand The AK The American Conservative The Bell Curve The Bible The Black Autumn The Cathedral The Confederacy The Constitution The Eight Banditos The Family The Free World The Great Awokening The Left The Middle East The New York Times The South The States The Zeroth Amendment To The Constitution Theranos Theresa May Third World Thomas Jefferson Thomas Massie Thomas Moorer Thought Crimes Tiananmen Massacre Tibet Tiger Mom TikTok TIMSS Tom Cotton Tom Massie Tom Wolfe Tony Blair Tony Blinken Tony Kleinfeld Too Many White People Torture Trade Trains Trans Fat Trans Fats Transgender Transgenderism Transhumanism Translation Translations Transportation Travel Trayvon Martin Trolling True Redneck Stereotypes Trump Trump Derangement Syndrome Trust Tsarist Russia Tucker Carlson Tulsa Tulsi Gabbard Turkey Turks TWA 800 Twins Twitter Ucla UFOs UK Ukrainian Crisis UN Security Council Unbearable Whiteness Unemployment Unions United Kingdom United Nations United Nations General Assembly United Nations Security Council United States Universal Basic Income UNRWA Urbanization Ursula Von Der Leyen Uruguay US Blacks US Capitol Storming 2021 US Civil War II US Constitution US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 US Regionalism USA USAID USS Liberty USSR Uyghurs Uzbekistan Vaccination Vaccines Valdimir Putin Valerie Plame Vdare Venezuela Vibrancy Victoria Nuland Victorian England Video Video Games Vietnam Vietnam War Vietnamese Vikings Viktor Orban Viktor Yanukovych Violence Vioxx Virginia Virginia Israel Advisory Board Vitamin D Vivek Ramaswamy Vladimir Zelensky Volodymur Zelenskyy Volodymyr Zelensky Vote Fraud Voter Fraud Voting Rights Voting Rights Act Vulcan Society Waffen SS Wall Street Walmart Wang Ching Wei Wang Jingwei War War Crimes War Guilt War In Donbass War On Christmas War On Terror War Powers War Powers Act Warhammer Washington DC WASPs Watergate Wealth Wealth Inequality Wealthy Web Traffic Weight WEIRDO Welfare Wendy Sherman West Bank Western Decline Western European Marriage Pattern Western Hypocrisy Western Media Western Religion Western Revival Westerns White America White Americans White Death White Flight White Guilt White Helmets White Liberals White Man's Burden White Nakba White Nationalism White Nationalists White People White Privilege White Slavery White Supremacy White Teachers Whiterpeople Whites Who Whom Whoopi Goldberg Wikileaks Wikipedia Wildfires William Browder William F. Buckley William Kristol William Latson William McGonagle William McRaven WINEP Winston Churchill Woke Capital Women Woodrow Wilson Workers Working Class World Bank World Economic Forum World Health Organization World Population World Values Survey World War G World War H World War Hair World War I World War III World War R World War T World War Weed WTF WVS WWII Xi Jinping Xinjiang Yahya Sinwar Yair Lapid Yemen Yevgeny Prigozhin Yoav Gallant Yogi Berra's Restaurant Yoram Hazony YouTube Yugoslavia Yuval Noah Harari Zbigniew Brzezinski Zimbabwe Zionism Zionists Zvika Fogel
Nothing found
All Commenters •ï¿½My
Comments
•ï¿½Followed
Commenters
�⇅All / By K.J. Noh
    The 2019 Novel Coronavirus, first detected late last year in the hub city of Wuhan, China is a rapidly-spreading viral disease, often characterized by a cluster of acute respiratory symptoms. The virulence of this outbreak has put most of China under a lockdown: over 50 million people have been quarantined in the immediate region; 40,000...
  • Thanks for this article. I will later go through the 300 plus comments.
    I have little faith in the NY Times. It is truly the dispenser of fake news and propaganda.
    It has been caught too many times publishing fake articles and before getting caught heaping praise on the writer.
    The Unz Review is a very good site (despite what the same few detractors say).
    This is a valuable article and fortunately we have vehicles to counter the disinformation which the blustery, pompous, egotistical NY Times puts out. The Times thinks New York City, NY is the heart of the country but they don’t seem to realize that millions of us know what their agenda is and to whom they cater to. Millions of us find the Times writers to be smug, egotistical, and untrustworthy.

  • CanSpeccy says: •ï¿½Website
    March 2, 2020 at 4:20 pm GMT •ï¿½100 Words

    Consider also that the outbreak occurred in Wuhan, just after 300 American military personnel had visited that city. That surely further depresses the odds of a random bioweapon release.

    Isn’t that a dopey argument?

    You’re planning a sneak biological weapons attack on your greatest geopolitical rival. So how you gonna proceed?

    Hey, here’s what. We’ve got 300 soldiers going to compete in the Military games in Wuhan. We’ll have them take a spray can of the stuff.

    As for what’s in the spray, it’s some kind of flu bug that kills a few old people and practically no one else.

    I suppose the US military may be that dumb. Still, it’s hard to believe.

  • mh505 says:
    @Ron Unz
    @mh505


    How can you be so sure? Accidents happen all the time no matter if the occurrence is highly unlikely or not.
    �
    Well, I was writing loosely and expansively, rather than choosing my words with great care. But here's a more precise version of my argument.

    As of right now, I haven't seen any solid evidence that the coronavirus is a bioweapon. But let's assume that it is.

    It was released at the absolute worst time for China, just before Lunar New Year, when it could have easily spread throughout the country. Let's say it was released during the worst ten-day window of a given year. The likelihood of this happening randomly (e.g. due to an accidental bioweapon release) is less than 3%, meaning that there's a 97% the release was non-accidental.

    Consider also that the outbreak occurred in Wuhan, just after 300 American military personnel had visited that city. That surely further depresses the odds of a random bioweapon release.

    So I'd say that if the coronavirus was a bioweapon, the likelihood of a non-random release is something like 99%, which I find pretty persuasive amid all the complex and conflicting claims and arguments.

    Replies: @mh505

    Indeed, Ron; there is no proof either way and there never might be.

    I agree and will go one step further: let’s say that the likelihood of a non-random release is something like 99.9%, This would leave a chance of 1 out of a thousand, odds that have been overcome at more than one occasion 🙂

    BTW: Dmitry Orlov has some interesting, if tongue in cheek, thoughts on the matter; see here
    https://cluborlov.blogspot.com/2020/02/a-most-convenient-virus.html?m=1

  • @mh505
    @Ron Unz


    The timing of the virus doesn’t fully rule out a natural event, but I do think it rules out an accidental release.
    �
    How can you be so sure? Accidents happen all the time no matter if the occurrence is highly unlikely or not.

    Look at roulette: how likely is it that the number 0 or 7 for that matter appears in a series, 5 or 6 times in a row (if memory serves, there might have been cases with an even higher series).

    Yet it happens frequently enough.

    Replies: @Ron Unz

    How can you be so sure? Accidents happen all the time no matter if the occurrence is highly unlikely or not.

    Well, I was writing loosely and expansively, rather than choosing my words with great care. But here’s a more precise version of my argument.

    As of right now, I haven’t seen any solid evidence that the coronavirus is a bioweapon. But let’s assume that it is.

    It was released at the absolute worst time for China, just before Lunar New Year, when it could have easily spread throughout the country. Let’s say it was released during the worst ten-day window of a given year. The likelihood of this happening randomly (e.g. due to an accidental bioweapon release) is less than 3%, meaning that there’s a 97% the release was non-accidental.

    Consider also that the outbreak occurred in Wuhan, just after 300 American military personnel had visited that city. That surely further depresses the odds of a random bioweapon release.

    So I’d say that if the coronavirus was a bioweapon, the likelihood of a non-random release is something like 99%, which I find pretty persuasive amid all the complex and conflicting claims and arguments.

    •ï¿½Agree: thetruth
    •ï¿½Replies: @mh505
    @Ron Unz

    Indeed, Ron; there is no proof either way and there never might be.

    I agree and will go one step further: let's say that the likelihood of a non-random release is something like 99.9%, This would leave a chance of 1 out of a thousand, odds that have been overcome at more than one occasion :)

    BTW: Dmitry Orlov has some interesting, if tongue in cheek, thoughts on the matter; see here
    https://cluborlov.blogspot.com/2020/02/a-most-convenient-virus.html?m=1
  • mh505 says:
    @Ron Unz
    @CanSpeccy


    Here’ s the Francis Boyle interview, which is pretty amazing....Is this guy on the level, delivering US propaganda, or nuts?
    �
    Well, I remember seeing Boyle's name floating around during the original 2002 Anthrax attacks. Perhaps it's unfair, but he always struck me as a leftist anti-biowarfare activist-crank. My guess is that people like that are fairly easily for Intelligence services to manipulate.

    I listened to a few minutes of his YouTube interview, and he seems to be saying that the Chinese had a biowarfare lab in Wehan, which accidentally released the virus, perhaps after having stolen it from the US. Offhand, that seems pretty implausible to me.

    First, Wehan is a huge city of 11M, not exactly the most sensible location for a biowarfare lab. Would the US put its biowarfare lab in the middle of NYC?

    Second, the virus was released just before Lunar New Year, the absolutely most disastrous time for a release in China because of the hundreds of millions of people traveling, potentially spreading the virus to the entire country. If the virus was somehow *accidentally* released, what is the likelihood it would happen at the absolutely worst time?

    The timing of the virus doesn't fully rule out a natural event, but I do think it rules out an accidental release.

    Incidentally, I noticed that the WN/Conspiracy people at Red Ice had a show on the virus, and they seemed to suggest the PRC had *deliberately* released it to exterminate enough older Chinese people to save on future Social Security costs, which seems rather doubtful to me. Maybe somebody just gave Red Ice a financial big donation or something.

    Frankly, these totally absurd PRC-release narratives floating around on the Internet make me deeply suspicious that some Intelligence agency is orchestrating them, which shifts me a little further in the biowarfare direction.

    I have zero technical expertise in this area, but the whole thing seems very, very suspicious to me.

    Replies: @CanSpeccy, @SBaker, @Wizard of Oz, @mh505

    The timing of the virus doesn’t fully rule out a natural event, but I do think it rules out an accidental release.

    How can you be so sure? Accidents happen all the time no matter if the occurrence is highly unlikely or not.

    Look at roulette: how likely is it that the number 0 or 7 for that matter appears in a series, 5 or 6 times in a row (if memory serves, there might have been cases with an even higher series).

    Yet it happens frequently enough.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Ron Unz
    @mh505


    How can you be so sure? Accidents happen all the time no matter if the occurrence is highly unlikely or not.
    �
    Well, I was writing loosely and expansively, rather than choosing my words with great care. But here's a more precise version of my argument.

    As of right now, I haven't seen any solid evidence that the coronavirus is a bioweapon. But let's assume that it is.

    It was released at the absolute worst time for China, just before Lunar New Year, when it could have easily spread throughout the country. Let's say it was released during the worst ten-day window of a given year. The likelihood of this happening randomly (e.g. due to an accidental bioweapon release) is less than 3%, meaning that there's a 97% the release was non-accidental.

    Consider also that the outbreak occurred in Wuhan, just after 300 American military personnel had visited that city. That surely further depresses the odds of a random bioweapon release.

    So I'd say that if the coronavirus was a bioweapon, the likelihood of a non-random release is something like 99%, which I find pretty persuasive amid all the complex and conflicting claims and arguments.

    Replies: @mh505
  • @Mike-SMO
    The author makes a pretty good rant, however, the doctor in question was discussion a disease outbreak with his "collegues". Are you suggesting that only political hacks are fit to discuss the medical problem in their well appointed offices?

    I love the scrap about the poor White woman held in a hospital without treatment in Japan, after all, she has a virus which may only be dangerous to "Asians". There is no specific treatment for a viral infection, just supportive care and quarantine. I don't know, and probably no one knows if the bug is lethal to the "Asians" living in Japan. If the Japanese were not being polite, she might have been "isolated" in an unused cargo container. If she, indeed, tested positive for the Corona Virus, she should, indeed, be locked away. She is as big a danger as the nurse who returned from the Ebola hot zone and refused quarantine, because she didn't want to and felt OK. She apparently forgot all her training about "contageous" and "incubation period". The twit in Japan apparently got her education in a modern academy where reality is whatever you want it to be.

    Free Speach is messy and the New York Times is a whore house. On the other hand, the Chinese people can see the government failures from the street level; an insufficient supply of test kits, insufficient hospital facilities, no provision for even primitive quarantine or even bed-on-the-floor custodial care. The Chinese government has locked down access to real information so fear will prevail. Silence does not inspire calm cooperation and compliance. Silence just "proves" that the idiots in charge don't have a clue. Silence generates panic.

    Suspicion about Corona being a bio-weapon is inevitable. In the silence from the government, worried people will focus on that possibility. Even if this was an accidental weapons release, it will not matter during the initial infection period as long as the populace sees that the government is taking reasonable action. But government silence gives them nothing else except rumor. Since its founding, the Chinese government has told the people what to believe and what to do. Silence now brings out the worst images of incompetence, malice, and cowardice. The commissars have a lot to learn.

    Replies: @Biff, @obwandiyag

    Insufficient supply is a symptom of “just in time” manufacturing. But you don’t wanna hear that because you are no doubt a true believer in “free markets” whatever the batshit hell they are.

  • @Kratoklastes
    @Anonymous

    Why is everyone behaving as if every positive test is a correct positive?

    The PPV (Positive Predictive Value) of a test depends on the specificity and sensitivity of the test, and the prevalence of the thing being tested for.

    Without even knowing specificity and sensitivity, for a disease with low prevalence it's overwhelmingly likely that an arbitrarily-selected asymptomatic individual who tests positive, is a false positive.

    Do the 'math' as Yanks say (hopefully this image from Wikipedia reproduces here):

    https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/46d31176abc5857689be02fafd1bfc7e0d60ef59

    So, even if the test is exceptionally good (99% sensitive and 99% specific), if it is deployed to test a condition that only affects 1% of the population then 50 percent of positives will be false positives.

    If the sensitivity and specificities are lower, then the false positive rate rises quickly. For example, if both are 95% (still unrealistically high), that implies that 84% of positive tests will be false positives.

    At present the number of cases is considerably less than 1% of the population.

    For low-prevalence diseases with relatively new tests, if there is a positive test result and the test subject is asymptomatic, the probability approaches 1 that the result is a false positive.

    As made clear by Altman & Bland (1994) in the BMJ:

    If the prevalence of the disease is very low, the positive predictive value will not be close to 1 even if both the sensitivity and specificity are high. Thus in screening the general population it is inevitable that many people with positive test results will be false positives.
    �
    In other words, the chubby American lassie in the video was given a good scare because the medical union doesn't really understand statistics - which is an indictment on them.


    Altman, D.G. and J. M. Bland, "Statistics Notes: Diagnostic tests 2: predictive values" BMJ 1994; 309 [doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.309.6947.102 ]

    Replies: @obwandiyag

    Oh, so what do you say? “Do the ‘maths’”? “Maths”. The English are so funny. Inadvertently. “Maths”. Hardehar. They talk like monkeys.

  • @Godfree Roberts
    @CanSpeccy

    It may sound like hyperbole to anyone who has not studied the matter but, believe me, the US has done everything it could safely get away with to bring down the PRC for seventy years.

    Just because you don't know about this campaign–which included ceaseless terrorism training for Tibetan and Muslim minorities, biowarfare, piracy, constant threats of nuclear attack, embargoes, trade wars, subversion, spying, and the careful, systematic creation of a false 'China' in Western minds–doesn't mean it didn't happen.

    The US didn't transfer its manufacturing capacity, greedy corporations aided by bribed politicians did–despite screams of resistance from workers and intellectuals alike. The process was a classic example of Marx's joke that capitalists will sell you the rope with which you hang them. It had no more to do with China than the current, destructive, share buybacks and non-investment in the US.

    What, exactly, do you mean by " the Red Guards here attack anyone they see as not a full-fledged Commie stooge — with relentless lies, hate, and obscenities"??

    Who are the Red Guards you refer to?

    Replies: @CanSpeccy

    The US didn’t transfer its manufacturing capacity, greedy corporations aided by bribed politicians did–despite screams of resistance from workers and intellectuals alike.

    There’s really not much use debating with someone who can’t understand, or won’t acknowledge, what you just said, as in:

    The US has, in fact, transferred much of its manufacturing capacity to China. Admittedly this was not an act of sheer generosity, it was simply what America’s largest corporations, Apple, Microsoft, IBM, Boeing, etc. demanded, thereby to maximize shareholder value while screwing the American worker..

  • @CanSpeccy
    @Godfree Roberts


    We have been at war with the PRC since hostilities ended, in 1949, seventy years ago and, while we have occasionally offered carrots to them, we have never stopped using the stick–especially the propaganda stick.
    �
    That is hyperbole.

    The US has, in fact, transferred much of its manufacturing capacity to China. Admittedly this was not an act of sheer generosity, it was simply what America's largest corporations, Apple, Microsoft, IBM, Boeing, etc. demanded, thereby to maximize shareholder value while screwing the American worker. But whatever the reason, this was a huge gift to China, not something one presents to an adversary during war.

    And seeing how the Red Guards here attack anyone they see as not a full-fledged Commie stooge -- with relentless lies, hate, and obscenities -- one can understand why ordinary folk in America and all true America patriots distrust Communist China. But it is foolish to conflate distrust of Chinese Communists who steel American military and commercial secrets with war.

    Replies: @Godfree Roberts

    It may sound like hyperbole to anyone who has not studied the matter but, believe me, the US has done everything it could safely get away with to bring down the PRC for seventy years.

    Just because you don’t know about this campaign–which included ceaseless terrorism training for Tibetan and Muslim minorities, biowarfare, piracy, constant threats of nuclear attack, embargoes, trade wars, subversion, spying, and the careful, systematic creation of a false ‘China’ in Western minds–doesn’t mean it didn’t happen.

    The US didn’t transfer its manufacturing capacity, greedy corporations aided by bribed politicians did–despite screams of resistance from workers and intellectuals alike. The process was a classic example of Marx’s joke that capitalists will sell you the rope with which you hang them. It had no more to do with China than the current, destructive, share buybacks and non-investment in the US.

    What, exactly, do you mean by ” the Red Guards here attack anyone they see as not a full-fledged Commie stooge — with relentless lies, hate, and obscenities”??

    Who are the Red Guards you refer to?

    •ï¿½Replies: @CanSpeccy
    @Godfree Roberts


    The US didn’t transfer its manufacturing capacity, greedy corporations aided by bribed politicians did–despite screams of resistance from workers and intellectuals alike.
    �
    There's really not much use debating with someone who can't understand, or won't acknowledge, what you just said, as in:

    The US has, in fact, transferred much of its manufacturing capacity to China. Admittedly this was not an act of sheer generosity, it was simply what America’s largest corporations, Apple, Microsoft, IBM, Boeing, etc. demanded, thereby to maximize shareholder value while screwing the American worker..
    �
  • CanSpeccy says: •ï¿½Website
    @Commentator Mike
    @CanSpeccy

    One wouldn't think that much has changed even though Russia and China have taken the capitalist path. Why the hostility towards Russia and China? Why does NATO keep expanding eastwards to Russia's borders? The West is not showing any goodwill whatsoever. I'd much prefer to see Russia link up more with the EU and USA but this is not possible given the state of the West, and it is the West that is driving it closer to China.

    Replies: @CanSpeccy

    Why the hostility towards Russia and China? Why does NATO keep expanding eastwards to Russia’s borders? The West is not showing any goodwill whatsoever.

    Good question. The answer is this. The Anglo-American elite still believe in the possibility of creating a global empire run according to their rules.

    Nato won the Cold War, the Soviet Union disintegrated and Soviet-occupied Eastern Europe was absorbed into the Western economic and military systems.

    The US funded anti-Russian Ukraine coup was the next step, stripping Russia of an important part of its “near abroad”, and opening Ukraine to looting by Soros and other Western oligarchs.

    The next step was to be a progressive break up of Russia through the promotion of revolt in Chechnya, and color revolution in Russia. Both projects have thus far failed, but the attempt to blame Putin for everything indicates that the project has not been abandoned.

    The ultimate objective is to break Russia into a series of Corruptionistans headed by Poroshenkite crooks willing to sell national assets to the Western oligarchs, while allowing NATO to expand Eastward, ultimately to the borders of China. At that point it will be game over, unless China is willing to wage war against most of the world.

    I wrote about this here:

    The ideology of Tony Blair, imperialist

    and here:

    Tony Blair, JP Morgan, the Council on Foreign Relations, and the Iraq War

    •ï¿½Thanks: Commentator Mike
  • @CanSpeccy

    To the extent possible, America is–and has been–at war with China for 70 years.
    �
    You have to remember why. China was one of the Allied powers during WW2. The Chinese army was headed by an American General, Joe Stillwell. It was the Communist revolution that ended America's long and friendly relationship with China. Following the Chinese Communist revolution, America, as leader of the Western alliance, was faced by a Communist monolith in Eurasia that was intent on global domination. But today, there is no Communist menace. Russia is post-Communist, and Eastern Europe like China has reverted to capitalism. America elites are no-doubt concerned about China overtaking the US as a global power. But it is ridiculous to claim that America is now, or has been for many years, at war with China.

    Incidentally, since you mention that Needham obtained his Ph.D. in four years, I will mention that I got mine in three!

    Replies: @Commentator Mike

    One wouldn’t think that much has changed even though Russia and China have taken the capitalist path. Why the hostility towards Russia and China? Why does NATO keep expanding eastwards to Russia’s borders? The West is not showing any goodwill whatsoever. I’d much prefer to see Russia link up more with the EU and USA but this is not possible given the state of the West, and it is the West that is driving it closer to China.

    •ï¿½Replies: @CanSpeccy
    @Commentator Mike


    Why the hostility towards Russia and China? Why does NATO keep expanding eastwards to Russia’s borders? The West is not showing any goodwill whatsoever.
    �
    Good question. The answer is this. The Anglo-American elite still believe in the possibility of creating a global empire run according to their rules.

    Nato won the Cold War, the Soviet Union disintegrated and Soviet-occupied Eastern Europe was absorbed into the Western economic and military systems.

    The US funded anti-Russian Ukraine coup was the next step, stripping Russia of an important part of its "near abroad", and opening Ukraine to looting by Soros and other Western oligarchs.

    The next step was to be a progressive break up of Russia through the promotion of revolt in Chechnya, and color revolution in Russia. Both projects have thus far failed, but the attempt to blame Putin for everything indicates that the project has not been abandoned.

    The ultimate objective is to break Russia into a series of Corruptionistans headed by Poroshenkite crooks willing to sell national assets to the Western oligarchs, while allowing NATO to expand Eastward, ultimately to the borders of China. At that point it will be game over, unless China is willing to wage war against most of the world.

    I wrote about this here:

    The ideology of Tony Blair, imperialist

    and here:

    Tony Blair, JP Morgan, the Council on Foreign Relations, and the Iraq War
  • CanSpeccy says: •ï¿½Website
    @Godfree Roberts
    For all his brilliance in the Burma campaign, Joe Stilwell never commanded the Nationalist Army. Chiang gave him a title to suggest that he did, but that was simply to keep the US aid flowing.

    We have been at war with the PRC since hostilities ended, in 1949, seventy years ago and, while we have occasionally offered carrots to them, we have never stopped using the stick–especially the propaganda stick.

    Replies: @CanSpeccy

    We have been at war with the PRC since hostilities ended, in 1949, seventy years ago and, while we have occasionally offered carrots to them, we have never stopped using the stick–especially the propaganda stick.

    That is hyperbole.

    The US has, in fact, transferred much of its manufacturing capacity to China. Admittedly this was not an act of sheer generosity, it was simply what America’s largest corporations, Apple, Microsoft, IBM, Boeing, etc. demanded, thereby to maximize shareholder value while screwing the American worker. But whatever the reason, this was a huge gift to China, not something one presents to an adversary during war.

    And seeing how the Red Guards here attack anyone they see as not a full-fledged Commie stooge — with relentless lies, hate, and obscenities — one can understand why ordinary folk in America and all true America patriots distrust Communist China. But it is foolish to conflate distrust of Chinese Communists who steel American military and commercial secrets with war.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Godfree Roberts
    @CanSpeccy

    It may sound like hyperbole to anyone who has not studied the matter but, believe me, the US has done everything it could safely get away with to bring down the PRC for seventy years.

    Just because you don't know about this campaign–which included ceaseless terrorism training for Tibetan and Muslim minorities, biowarfare, piracy, constant threats of nuclear attack, embargoes, trade wars, subversion, spying, and the careful, systematic creation of a false 'China' in Western minds–doesn't mean it didn't happen.

    The US didn't transfer its manufacturing capacity, greedy corporations aided by bribed politicians did–despite screams of resistance from workers and intellectuals alike. The process was a classic example of Marx's joke that capitalists will sell you the rope with which you hang them. It had no more to do with China than the current, destructive, share buybacks and non-investment in the US.

    What, exactly, do you mean by " the Red Guards here attack anyone they see as not a full-fledged Commie stooge — with relentless lies, hate, and obscenities"??

    Who are the Red Guards you refer to?

    Replies: @CanSpeccy
  • For all his brilliance in the Burma campaign, Joe Stilwell never commanded the Nationalist Army. Chiang gave him a title to suggest that he did, but that was simply to keep the US aid flowing.

    We have been at war with the PRC since hostilities ended, in 1949, seventy years ago and, while we have occasionally offered carrots to them, we have never stopped using the stick–especially the propaganda stick.

    •ï¿½Replies: @CanSpeccy
    @Godfree Roberts


    We have been at war with the PRC since hostilities ended, in 1949, seventy years ago and, while we have occasionally offered carrots to them, we have never stopped using the stick–especially the propaganda stick.
    �
    That is hyperbole.

    The US has, in fact, transferred much of its manufacturing capacity to China. Admittedly this was not an act of sheer generosity, it was simply what America's largest corporations, Apple, Microsoft, IBM, Boeing, etc. demanded, thereby to maximize shareholder value while screwing the American worker. But whatever the reason, this was a huge gift to China, not something one presents to an adversary during war.

    And seeing how the Red Guards here attack anyone they see as not a full-fledged Commie stooge -- with relentless lies, hate, and obscenities -- one can understand why ordinary folk in America and all true America patriots distrust Communist China. But it is foolish to conflate distrust of Chinese Communists who steel American military and commercial secrets with war.

    Replies: @Godfree Roberts
  • CanSpeccy says: •ï¿½Website

    To the extent possible, America is–and has been–at war with China for 70 years.

    You have to remember why. China was one of the Allied powers during WW2. The Chinese army was headed by an American General, Joe Stillwell. It was the Communist revolution that ended America’s long and friendly relationship with China. Following the Chinese Communist revolution, America, as leader of the Western alliance, was faced by a Communist monolith in Eurasia that was intent on global domination. But today, there is no Communist menace. Russia is post-Communist, and Eastern Europe like China has reverted to capitalism. America elites are no-doubt concerned about China overtaking the US as a global power. But it is ridiculous to claim that America is now, or has been for many years, at war with China.

    Incidentally, since you mention that Needham obtained his Ph.D. in four years, I will mention that I got mine in three!

    •ï¿½Replies: @Commentator Mike
    @CanSpeccy

    One wouldn't think that much has changed even though Russia and China have taken the capitalist path. Why the hostility towards Russia and China? Why does NATO keep expanding eastwards to Russia's borders? The West is not showing any goodwill whatsoever. I'd much prefer to see Russia link up more with the EU and USA but this is not possible given the state of the West, and it is the West that is driving it closer to China.

    Replies: @CanSpeccy
  • Good points, though Needham was certainly no slouch as a bench scientist. He got his bachelor’s degree in June 1921, his master’s degree in January 1925 and his PhD in October 1925. After graduating, Needham entered the laboratory of biochemistry of Cambridge in 1918, joining Gonville and Caius College. For the following twenty years, his research interests would focus on embryology and morphogenesis. In 1924, he was nominated research fellow. In 1966, he became master of the Caius College. He kept this title until 1976.

    America doesn’t need to be at war to launch bioweapons on a country, as its campaigns in Cuba demonstrate: The US BW attacks on Cuba are laid out in Ariel Alonso Pérez’s book, Biological Warfare Against Cuba.
    The notorious terrorist and counterrevolutionary of Cuban descent Eduardo Arocena, leader of the terrorist group Omega-7 linked to the US Central Intelligence Agency, was charged [in 1984] with the 1980 murder of Cuban diplomat Felix Garcia Rodriguez, one of Cuba’s UN representatives, and with participation in a number of bomb blasts in America. In his court statement, before the New York Federal Court, he said that: “My group’s mission was to receive certain germs to introduce them in Cuba . . . to start the so-called “chemical war.â€
    Cuban investigators determined that the dengue attack was launched in December of 1980. Arocena admitted in court that his boat and another boat participated in the attack. Mosquito vectors infected with dengue fever were brought ashore and released. The dengue attack was withering.
    As recognized by the Pan American Health Organization and the World Health Organization, the hemorrhagic dengue epidemic in Cuba in 1981, had no precedent in the history of this disease. It was also the most serious and significant case recorded in the world, with a total number of 344,203 people affected; 10,312 of them developed serious conditions . . . 158 people died of which 101 were children.
    Pérez estimates losses to the Cuban economy from the epidemic at $103 million (1988) US dollars. The US-led international trade blockade against Cuba made purchasing pesticides and larvacides on the international market very expensive and difficult to acquire. Schools were converted into makeshift hospitals to provide care. The epidemic lasted for ten months. 
    Pérez details two other US BW attacks against Cuba’s agriculture sector. In 1971 Swine flu broke out affecting the entirety of Cuba’s national swineherd. 400,000 pigs across the island were mass slaughtered and buried in pits to contain this epidemic. On October 21, 1996 at 10:08 am, the pilot and co-pilot of Cuban National Airlines flight 710 witnessed an American “fumigator†type airplane identified by its serial number, emitting spray clouds in bursts from its tanks as it flew across Cuban air space within the Giron international air corridor which bisects Cuba on a north-south axis. Cuban scientists quickly discovered the thrips palmi insect in downwind plumes beneath the airplane’s flight pattern. Thrips palmi lay their eggs within the fleshy part of a plant leaf making them highly resilient to many pesticides. 
    Again, the shortage of larvacides and the difficulties imposed by the embargo greatly increased the duration and destructiveness of the plague outbreak. 
    By this same time in 1996, the Cuban economy had hit rock bottom following the collapse of the USSR. Cuba overnight lost its sugar market and petroleum subsidies, and its export-based economy slid into a deep depression. The agricultural sector still organized around monoculture sugar collapsed causing widespread shortages of bread, meat, food imports, and basic commodities. The Cuban potato and bean crops were devastated by the thrips palmi, and Cuba was brought to the brink of famine. 
    In addition to these three BW attacks detailed by Pérez, Cuba accused the US in 1992 of spreading “black plant louse†from Guantánamo Naval Base. This insect is actually an aphid which destroyed the citrus harvest that year, and killed trees and whole orchards. The next year arrived the “citrus leafhopper,â€Â which continued the depredation of citrus orchards. In 1994, Cuban coffee plants were attacked by the “coffee bean borer†which destroyed 80% of the coffee harvest. Though common to many coffee growing regions worldwide, this borer had not previously been found in Cuba. In 1997 Cuba’s effort to greatly expand its rice harvest was set back by a “rice mite†infestation. The mite infestation facilitated a fungus bloom, the “mite-fungus complex,†which in turn caused grain stalks to shrivel and rot. This plague was previously unknown in the Western Hemisphere. Other BW attacks against agriculture documented by Cuban scientists include varroasis, another mite-borne scourge which attacks bees and destroys apiaries, flower pollination and honey production, and the tobacco blue mold. 
    The common theme of these plant diseases is their first appearance on the island of Cuba. Some of the plant diseases were global in reach and may have arrived by trade and shipping, but the Cuban trade embargo made the arrival of an annual parade of plagues during the Reagan, Bush I, and Clinton presidencies rather anomalous. The December 1980 Dengue fever attack was a kick in the pants from the Army and CIA to the outgoing Carter Administration which had given up the Panama Canal for nothing, and pulled the chain on the Iran hostage rescue. It was also a wake-up call to Fidel Castro for his military adventurism in Angola. The new Reagan Administration intended to restore American jingoism. 

    To the extent possible, America is–and has been–at war with China for 70 years. The current campaigns–the massive swine flu outbreak, a severe bird flu, the coronavirus epidemic, political agitation in Hong Kong, the re-election of Taiwan’s pro-independence president, stepped-up naval operations in the East and South China Seas, the trade war, and the first known case of attempted corporate murder-kidnapping–are, I believe, signs of desperation.

  • CanSpeccy says: •ï¿½Website
    @Godfree Roberts
    @El Dato

    Before you do any more shunting, read THE REPORT OF THEINTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC COMMISSION FOR THE INVESTIGATION OF THE FACTS CONCERNING BACTERIAL WARFARE IN KOREA AND CHINA.

    Its lead author, Sir Joseph Needham, was Britain's most distinguished scientist. And excerpt from Professor Needham's Oral History: https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/80009774

    On Jan. 13th, 1952, a B-26 bomber of the American Air Force was shot down over An-Ju in Korea. By May 5th statements of considerable length admitting their participation in bacteriological warfare had been made by the navigator Lt. K. L. Enoch, and by the pilot, Lt. John Quinn, and issued to the world through Peking. As has already been stated, these documents will be found in SIA/14 and 15 respectively, and together with lithograph reproductions of the original manuscripts, in the printed brochure issued from Prague. The relevant parts are here reproduced in App. KK. and LL. Documents SIA/17 and 18 should also be consulted, though the later interviews recounted in them did not add much to the technical and scientific evidence. What were the essential points in the principal declarations of these airmen? First of all, both officers had had to attend, in Japan and in Korea, secret lectures on the methods of bacteriological warfare. These expositions, which it was impressed on them contained highly confidential information, described the use of bacteria directly as cultures deposited or sprayed, of insects transmitting diseases biologically or mechanically, of rodents in parachute-containers, of poisoned foods, and of bacteria containing artillery shells. Various kinds of containers or "bombs" were described and sketched. Correct altitudes and air-speeds for delivery were given. Particularly significant statements made in the lecture attended by Lt. Quinn were (a) that "almost any insect could be used for spreading diseases", (b) that "rats could be dropped, though this might not be necessary'', and (c) that there was an intention to use encephalitis, "for which no positive cure is known." Secondly, both officers had received orders to carry out bacteriological warfare missions, and had duly fl.own them, though with the greatest inner reluctance. There were various peculiarities about the special bombs used, and in some cases these were under special guard so that the pilots could not examine them too closely. In one of the reports information was given as to the various types of planes most suitable for delivering various kinds of containers. From the personal knowledge of the two airmen many of their fellow service-men had also engaged in such missions, and later conversations brought out well the large number of Air Force personnel who had been instructed on bacteriological warfare, Lt. Enoch was briefed "germ bombs" while Lt. Quinn was briefed "duds", but both were told that in debriefing (i.e. reporting the results of the flight) "duds" was to be the term used. There can be no doubt that these admissions had considerable influence on the western world. But those who did not wish to be convinced tended to brush them aside as confessions obtained under physical or mental duress, saying that after all, only two young men had come forward, and suggesting indeed they did not really exist at all, and that the whole declarations were forged. Attempts, however, to demonstrate inconsistencies in Lt. Quinn's story, failed (SIA/16).
    �

    Replies: @CanSpeccy

    Its lead author, Sir Joseph Needham, was Britain’s most distinguished scientist.

    Most people would consider that characterization of Needham was a wild exaggeration. in fact his contribution to science was slight, his chief interest being the history of science and technology. None of which detracts from his testimony concerning American use of biological weapons in Korea. However, when considering the COVIR19 epidemic in China in the context of that evidence, it should be remembered that America was at war with Korea at the time to which Needham’s testimony refers.What America may have done in Korea while at war in that country has surely little if any relevance to the question of what America might do today in China, a hugely important US trade partner.

  • @El Dato
    @Tusk

    For me, anyone who says this is a bioweapon is immediately shunted to the cookie corner, and I hope the mofo doesn't emerge from there fast.

    I makes me so angry that know-nothings dump effluvium onto the Internet with nary a thought nor any basic knowledge.

    It's ok if it's on Twitter, with is a craphole of mental decay in any case, but articles should be properly constructed and sourced or STFU.

    Replies: @Godfree Roberts

    Before you do any more shunting, read THE REPORT OF THEINTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC COMMISSION FOR THE INVESTIGATION OF THE FACTS CONCERNING BACTERIAL WARFARE IN KOREA AND CHINA.

    Its lead author, Sir Joseph Needham, was Britain’s most distinguished scientist. And excerpt from Professor Needham’s Oral History: https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/80009774

    On Jan. 13th, 1952, a B-26 bomber of the American Air Force was shot down over An-Ju in Korea. By May 5th statements of considerable length admitting their participation in bacteriological warfare had been made by the navigator Lt. K. L. Enoch, and by the pilot, Lt. John Quinn, and issued to the world through Peking. As has already been stated, these documents will be found in SIA/14 and 15 respectively, and together with lithograph reproductions of the original manuscripts, in the printed brochure issued from Prague. The relevant parts are here reproduced in App. KK. and LL. Documents SIA/17 and 18 should also be consulted, though the later interviews recounted in them did not add much to the technical and scientific evidence. What were the essential points in the principal declarations of these airmen? First of all, both officers had had to attend, in Japan and in Korea, secret lectures on the methods of bacteriological warfare. These expositions, which it was impressed on them contained highly confidential information, described the use of bacteria directly as cultures deposited or sprayed, of insects transmitting diseases biologically or mechanically, of rodents in parachute-containers, of poisoned foods, and of bacteria containing artillery shells. Various kinds of containers or “bombs” were described and sketched. Correct altitudes and air-speeds for delivery were given. Particularly significant statements made in the lecture attended by Lt. Quinn were (a) that “almost any insect could be used for spreading diseases”, (b) that “rats could be dropped, though this might not be necessary”, and (c) that there was an intention to use encephalitis, “for which no positive cure is known.” Secondly, both officers had received orders to carry out bacteriological warfare missions, and had duly fl.own them, though with the greatest inner reluctance. There were various peculiarities about the special bombs used, and in some cases these were under special guard so that the pilots could not examine them too closely. In one of the reports information was given as to the various types of planes most suitable for delivering various kinds of containers. From the personal knowledge of the two airmen many of their fellow service-men had also engaged in such missions, and later conversations brought out well the large number of Air Force personnel who had been instructed on bacteriological warfare, Lt. Enoch was briefed “germ bombs” while Lt. Quinn was briefed “duds”, but both were told that in debriefing (i.e. reporting the results of the flight) “duds” was to be the term used. There can be no doubt that these admissions had considerable influence on the western world. But those who did not wish to be convinced tended to brush them aside as confessions obtained under physical or mental duress, saying that after all, only two young men had come forward, and suggesting indeed they did not really exist at all, and that the whole declarations were forged. Attempts, however, to demonstrate inconsistencies in Lt. Quinn’s story, failed (SIA/16).

    •ï¿½Replies: @CanSpeccy
    @Godfree Roberts


    Its lead author, Sir Joseph Needham, was Britain’s most distinguished scientist.
    �
    Most people would consider that characterization of Needham was a wild exaggeration. in fact his contribution to science was slight, his chief interest being the history of science and technology. None of which detracts from his testimony concerning American use of biological weapons in Korea. However, when considering the COVIR19 epidemic in China in the context of that evidence, it should be remembered that America was at war with Korea at the time to which Needham's testimony refers.What America may have done in Korea while at war in that country has surely little if any relevance to the question of what America might do today in China, a hugely important US trade partner.
  • Some Westerners want Chinese to criticize the government? I think you should come to Chinese social media to see how Chinese netizens criticize the government. China has freedom of speech but no rumor. The Chinese don’t want a group of fools to let society be abducted and populated by populism, just like what is happening in many western societies.

  • @Unorthodox Black Sheep VN
    First,

    China build Huoshenshan Hospital in Wuhan in 10 days is not impressive or surprise thing to me. China have done very good jobs to fight the Coronavirus, of course. The reason why the fast speed does not impress or be surprise me because:

    1. Huoshenshan Hospital is Fabricated Hospital. Other Western countries can do the same thing like what China have done if they really want to do (no corruption, of course). Let watch some videos on building prefab structures:

    Pre-cast tech: Delivering 2BHK homes in 24 hours
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CvXuEQZWNqQ

    Modular Home from Start to Finish
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXUd-yUy0S0

    Prefab House Kits – What to Expect
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSEEQ2XnMIw

    Prefabricated Wall Panels
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sl3_bo-XWGQ

    Prefabricated building Systems / Montažni objekti
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMiQAxkwpZs

    2. According to the news:

    Hero Chinese whistle-blower doctor who was punished for sounding the alarm over coronavirus DIES from it (I don’t think China Government kill Li Wenliang, of course):
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7974593/Coronavirus-whistle-blower-dies-deadly-disease-catching-patient.html

    China had hide the information about the Coronavirus since the December 30th, 2019. That mean they already finished many bureaucracy processes and prepared money to build Huoshenshan. So this is reason why they build the hospital so quickly.

    In my country Vietnam, many structure was build slowly and some of them are not finished in 10 years because the builder does not have money. When the money come, workers build the structures so quickly.

    I usually avoid using MSM news like CNN, Fox, BBC, etc. but this CNN new about Wuhan hospital just confirm what I said about China ‘act big talk big’ and it is pretty reasonable to me:

    How to design a hospital that’s built in days, by someone who’s done it before
    https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/07/asia/wuhan-coronavirus-hospital-design-intl-hnk/index.html

    Next,

    China also lied about their 'rapid 15 minutes coronavirus test'. Here is the true rapid test:

    Two New Rapid Coronavirus Tests Could Play Key Role in Efforts to Contain Growing Epidemic
    https://www.benzinga.com/pressreleases/20/01/n15232375/two-new-rapid-coronavirus-tests-could-play-key-role-in-efforts-to-contain-growing-epidemic

    Novacyt S.A.: Launch of Novel Coronavirus Test
    https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20200130005908/en/Novacyt-S.A.%C2%A0Launch-Coronavirus-Test

    Finally,

    Coronavirus is worse one by one:

    Black Swan Updates and Observations
    https://www.winterwatch.net/2020/02/black-swan-updates-and-observations/

    In conclusion, China 'act big talk big’, ‘save the face’ and liars is used to tricked people (especially the inferiority complex ones) to believe China is unique like the God or the Deity.

    Replies: @èµµ

    In fact, Vietnamese cannot do it at all. The people in your country are poor and lazy. And your speculation is very imaginative, but I suggest you better come to live in China. Don’t live in China sixty years ago.

  • @Ron Unz
    @CanSpeccy


    Here’ s the Francis Boyle interview, which is pretty amazing....Is this guy on the level, delivering US propaganda, or nuts?
    �
    Well, I remember seeing Boyle's name floating around during the original 2002 Anthrax attacks. Perhaps it's unfair, but he always struck me as a leftist anti-biowarfare activist-crank. My guess is that people like that are fairly easily for Intelligence services to manipulate.

    I listened to a few minutes of his YouTube interview, and he seems to be saying that the Chinese had a biowarfare lab in Wehan, which accidentally released the virus, perhaps after having stolen it from the US. Offhand, that seems pretty implausible to me.

    First, Wehan is a huge city of 11M, not exactly the most sensible location for a biowarfare lab. Would the US put its biowarfare lab in the middle of NYC?

    Second, the virus was released just before Lunar New Year, the absolutely most disastrous time for a release in China because of the hundreds of millions of people traveling, potentially spreading the virus to the entire country. If the virus was somehow *accidentally* released, what is the likelihood it would happen at the absolutely worst time?

    The timing of the virus doesn't fully rule out a natural event, but I do think it rules out an accidental release.

    Incidentally, I noticed that the WN/Conspiracy people at Red Ice had a show on the virus, and they seemed to suggest the PRC had *deliberately* released it to exterminate enough older Chinese people to save on future Social Security costs, which seems rather doubtful to me. Maybe somebody just gave Red Ice a financial big donation or something.

    Frankly, these totally absurd PRC-release narratives floating around on the Internet make me deeply suspicious that some Intelligence agency is orchestrating them, which shifts me a little further in the biowarfare direction.

    I have zero technical expertise in this area, but the whole thing seems very, very suspicious to me.

    Replies: @CanSpeccy, @SBaker, @Wizard of Oz, @mh505

    Another numbers problem I see in your reasoning here:

    “Second, the virus was released just before Lunar New Year, the absolutely most disastrous time for a release in China because of the hundreds of millions of people traveling, potentially spreading the virus to the entire country. If the virus was somehow *accidentally* released, what is the likelihood it would happen at the absolutely worst time?

    The timing of the virus doesn’t fully rule out a natural event, but I do think it rules out an accidental release.”

    “Just the worst time” – but is that 1 day out of 365 or maybe 50 days out of 365 and then narrowed down by seasonal considerations to 50 out of 90 or so? So the equivalent accident could have happened several times but it would only be when it happened around early December that it took off. A bit like the arguments for and against Creation or mere chance (with or without multiverses) for the existence of life.

  • @bandolero
    @Pat Kittle

    that jew york times concept is really so clever that i'm surprised more clever commentators don't use it more often. it's hard to tell if everyone who lives there is a jew or if the entire staff of the newspaper is jewish. either way, it sure is clever to hear morons repeat the term jew york times over and over again decade upon decade.

    Replies: @Pat Kittle

    Maybe in Hebrew (((you))) don’t have the concept of capitalization, but in English we do.

    Learn to use it.

  • @steinbergfeldwitzcohen
    @Ron Unz

    I’ve seen zero evidence that the Coronavirus is a bioweapon---Ron Unz

    Wuhan 400 has many factor gains.
    1. It is much smaller in microns so it can infect at a greater distance. Sars infected at 2-3 ft and Wuhan at 6-8 ft. Factor gain=3-4x

    2. R(o)= it is not like a regular flu. It probably has an R naught of 3-4.5. We are seeing this on the cruise ship outbreak where it spread like wild fire through either a poor quality plumbing system (no p traps) or venting or both. Serious gain in virulence from Sars. Just look at the lying CPC numbers of deaths. Even low balled this is making Sars look like a walk in the park. Death Gain.

    3. Asymptomatic: people carry it but don't show symptoms. The disease has a timeline among those who end up with a serious case of 3-4wks. The problem often occurs around day 10 with pneumonia. Another gain-->length of illness.

    There is also the fact that Pribright Institute patented (Europe and America) a coronavirus vaccine. That is hardly being mentioned.

    I suggest reading a transcript of Francis Boyle. He wrote the U.S. bio-weapons legislation in the 80's and was interviewed weeks ago by Great Game India.

    China has been hit hard for over 15 years. Sars, hxny avian and human flus, swine flus hitting their independent protein supply, etcetera ad nauseum. The Chinese have higher hygienic standards than Africa and India yet continue to get hammered.
    This is bio-warfare. The evidence for this is extensive. Proving it in a court of law? Probably not. However, the Chinese have evidence of drone attacks from the recent swine flu that show the drones were made by one injection mold. So, prior planning of 6+ months, along with physical evidence of one source of the drones and that it was a costly, industrial process NOT the work of a bunch of guys in a back yard garage.

    This isn't over. Zionist elements in U.S. government have decided that to maintain dominance it is simple to assassinate (Soleimani) and use bio-warfare (Wuhan). Neither of these types of actions are the work of rational adults in an open room. They are the actions of ruthless psychopaths who have infiltrated the corridors of power throughout our world.

    Replies: @utu, @CanSpeccy, @Adûnâi, @Wizard of Oz

    HiFor obvious reasons (though many commenters don’t seem to notice them) I try to find material for raising questions within interesting probably contentious comments. Here I am struck by your reference to the Chinese having physical evidence (the mold they were all made from) of a single source for the drones. That cries out for elaboration. How many drones ended up in government hands? What proportion of the total would that have been? Above all, what was the inferred source? In what country? From what registered design or whatever? Oops, I see I have been anticipated.

  • @anon
    @d dan


    Face it, PRC is a successful country.
    �
    Yeah, PRC is so successful, it's on lockdown because you slopeheads refuse to stop eating tiger dicks, chicken lips and putting live bats up your asses.
    I hope you ching chongs keep eating bats and wolves, and dogs and cats and get more diseases.
    The less of you barbaric insects on the planet the better:)

    Replies: @last straw, @Ber

    Do not mock at others’ eating habits. A google of what elite Americans eat in NY will make you sick. ..like the Explorers Club. They call it “exotic” meals.

  • @Pat Kittle
    @utu


    China is not forthcoming and not showing the full scope of what is happening.
    �
    As if the Jew York Times is.

    Replies: @bandolero

    that jew york times concept is really so clever that i’m surprised more clever commentators don’t use it more often. it’s hard to tell if everyone who lives there is a jew or if the entire staff of the newspaper is jewish. either way, it sure is clever to hear morons repeat the term jew york times over and over again decade upon decade.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Pat Kittle
    @bandolero

    Maybe in Hebrew (((you))) don't have the concept of capitalization, but in English we do.

    Learn to use it.
  • @anon
    @d dan


    Face it, PRC is a successful country.
    �
    Yeah, PRC is so successful, it's on lockdown because you slopeheads refuse to stop eating tiger dicks, chicken lips and putting live bats up your asses.
    I hope you ching chongs keep eating bats and wolves, and dogs and cats and get more diseases.
    The less of you barbaric insects on the planet the better:)

    Replies: @last straw, @Ber

    Natural disasters happen. Plague, flu, Lyme disease, Ebola, Hurricane Katrina, Fukushima etc etc. China has been very successful in the past 40 years despite experiencing such disasters, such as SARS, and the earthquake in 2008 that killed more than 70,000. This one will also blow over, and China will be back to its trajectory of inexorable ascension.

    •ï¿½Agree: Wizard of Oz
  • anon[274] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:
    @d dan
    @Kim


    "It has been obvious from the start that communism cannot create prosperity and is the enemy of freedom. ..."
    �
    Ha, ha, not a very bright troll. I am not a communist nor a communist supporter. Your anti-communism creeds have been applied to the wrong person, with the wrong answers to the wrong questions. I don't care whether it is a communist or a capitalist government, if it helps the people, it is a good government.

    Your original post claims that: "First, of course, they had to put those people into poverty." So, I demand proof that they INTENTIONALLY PUT them into poverty. What your answer is a ranting of repeated and unproved lies: 65 million dead, mass murder, famine, starvation, cannibalism (wow, cannibalism? at least his one is new to me) blah, blah, blah.

    Just a little hint to help you: by 1950s, CCP was already in firm control of mainland. Exactly what is the incentive for them to intentionally put those people into poverty? Why? What is the rationale? What is the motivation to murder 65 millions? You don't have a rational and plausible answer.

    As for the comparison with Japan, Taiwan, Korea, etc, ha, ha, another dumb point. Firstly, these are small countries. Secondly, they have firm supports of US - economically, financially, militarily, etc. Thirdly, unlike PRC, they (except Korea) don't have to fight various wars to defend their border. And finally, even under the sanctions of both superpowers, China developed its own nuclear weapon, nuclear submarine, satellite, etc, a burden that none of these countries need to bear.

    Face it, PRC is a successful country. Simply admitting it will free up your brain for better uses.

    Replies: @Kim, @anon

    Face it, PRC is a successful country.

    Yeah, PRC is so successful, it’s on lockdown because you slopeheads refuse to stop eating tiger dicks, chicken lips and putting live bats up your asses.
    I hope you ching chongs keep eating bats and wolves, and dogs and cats and get more diseases.
    The less of you barbaric insects on the planet the better:)

    •ï¿½Troll: Alfred, Wizard of Oz
    •ï¿½Replies: @last straw
    @anon

    Natural disasters happen. Plague, flu, Lyme disease, Ebola, Hurricane Katrina, Fukushima etc etc. China has been very successful in the past 40 years despite experiencing such disasters, such as SARS, and the earthquake in 2008 that killed more than 70,000. This one will also blow over, and China will be back to its trajectory of inexorable ascension.
    , @Ber
    @anon

    Do not mock at others' eating habits. A google of what elite Americans eat in NY will make you sick. ..like the Explorers Club. They call it "exotic" meals.
  • @Ron Unz
    @CanSpeccy


    Here’ s the Francis Boyle interview, which is pretty amazing....Is this guy on the level, delivering US propaganda, or nuts?
    �
    Well, I remember seeing Boyle's name floating around during the original 2002 Anthrax attacks. Perhaps it's unfair, but he always struck me as a leftist anti-biowarfare activist-crank. My guess is that people like that are fairly easily for Intelligence services to manipulate.

    I listened to a few minutes of his YouTube interview, and he seems to be saying that the Chinese had a biowarfare lab in Wehan, which accidentally released the virus, perhaps after having stolen it from the US. Offhand, that seems pretty implausible to me.

    First, Wehan is a huge city of 11M, not exactly the most sensible location for a biowarfare lab. Would the US put its biowarfare lab in the middle of NYC?

    Second, the virus was released just before Lunar New Year, the absolutely most disastrous time for a release in China because of the hundreds of millions of people traveling, potentially spreading the virus to the entire country. If the virus was somehow *accidentally* released, what is the likelihood it would happen at the absolutely worst time?

    The timing of the virus doesn't fully rule out a natural event, but I do think it rules out an accidental release.

    Incidentally, I noticed that the WN/Conspiracy people at Red Ice had a show on the virus, and they seemed to suggest the PRC had *deliberately* released it to exterminate enough older Chinese people to save on future Social Security costs, which seems rather doubtful to me. Maybe somebody just gave Red Ice a financial big donation or something.

    Frankly, these totally absurd PRC-release narratives floating around on the Internet make me deeply suspicious that some Intelligence agency is orchestrating them, which shifts me a little further in the biowarfare direction.

    I have zero technical expertise in this area, but the whole thing seems very, very suspicious to me.

    Replies: @CanSpeccy, @SBaker, @Wizard of Oz, @mh505

    A couple of comments here Ron, the anthrax attack was actually in 2001 with the initial releases in the later half of September. The anthrax disseminated through the US mail was both crude and weapons grade quality, and that means the perp had expertise in weaponizing technology.

    I would be willing to bet a large sum that the Chicoms have an offensive bioweapons program and it might be sited in Wuhan which is where they have an institute of virology. The US has a defensive program but the offensive program was shut down in 1972 or so and the offensive bioweapons treaty signed by 126 countries including the USSR, that subsequently moved their operation underground. Ken Alibekov defected to the West in 1992 and told the story of the massive offensive program program the USSR had at that time–USSR dissolved and shut down their program sometime in the mid-1990s but where did those 100,000 scientists go and where did the tons of weaponized agents end up–were they destroyed? Are those scientists for sale?

    If I comment on the timing of this event it would be pure speculation, but I will anyway, since you made some good points about the timing. It does seem the near ideal time for a release, but why would they do the release in the city with the Chinese Institute of Virology? This would draw attention to the lab, which makes me think the release more likely accidental, and lab accidents do happen.

    The RNA inserts from the HIV virus demonstrate this novel CoronaV was not naturally occurring but something I would expect to see coming out of an Institute of Virology and your suspicions of a bioweapon have merit. This is not something ever seen in nature and 75% of human pathogens came from animals and 60% of emerging (new) diseases come from animals. The SARS and MERS coronaVs both have animal origins. An interesting story and somewhere lies the truth.

  • @CanSpeccy
    @utu


    Francis Boyle seems to believe that the safety of level 4 labs (BSL-4) is not good enough and thus leaks are occurring.
    �
    At the Canadian Level 4 lab in Winnipeg, there have been several incidents of illicit removal of biological material, including material taken to the Wuhan lab. In another incident, a worker transferring to a job in the US was stopped at the US border, while carrying microbiological samples. So leaks from such labs do happen. And if someone accidentally infects themselves while working in the lab, maybe without even realizing it, then they could set off an epidemic.

    Replies: @utu, @SBaker

    “And if someone accidentally infects themselves not even realizing it, then they could set off an epidemic.”

    And lab accidents just like this have happened many times. You make a very good point and anyone that has worked in a bio lab knows this. The infected person is the biological dissemination device and a mobile delivery system too.

  • @ivan
    The Chinese are definitely more susceptible to this virus than others. The question is why? Apart from genetic factors, the possibility that prior vaccination played a role in inadvertently increasing their vulnerability cannot be ruled out. This may account for the cytokinesis expression - basically an overreaction to the virus that ends up destroying the infected person himself. Chicoms are too clever by half. They should learn some humility.

    Replies: @Ber, @Kim, @SBaker

    “The Chinese are definitely more susceptible to this virus than others. The question is why? Apart from genetic factors, the possibility that prior vaccination played a role in inadvertently increasing their vulnerability cannot be ruled out. This may account for the cytokinesis expression – basically an overreaction to the virus that ends up destroying the infected person himself. Chicoms are too clever by half. They should learn some humility.”

    What proof do you have that the Chinese are more susceptible? They are the epicenter, but that doesn’t mean they are more susceptible. Prior vax making them more susceptible to cytokine storms? Really, how so? I do have a great deal of distrust of the chicoms.

  • @utu
    @Ber

    The guy in the video is making the claim but w/o any source all I see is that he is planting the info about drones being all from the same source. To make such a claim somebody would have to have seen pictures of several drones captured in different place and provinces. He does not provide any source. Imo he is just flowing with the story helping it with small confabulations to improve the narrative.

    Replies: @Ber

    I have read some kind of news by the South China Morning Post re farmers protesting or making a scene (forgot details) about the drones etc.

  • CanSpeccy says: •ï¿½Website
    @utu
    @CanSpeccy

    "illicit removal of biological material" - Why are you making it up?

    "Canadian officials say the shipment was part of its efforts to support public-health research worldwide. " - Nothing illicit about it.

    What however might be more interesting is the case of Dr. Frank Plummer:

    https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/canadian-scientist-undergoes-novel-brain-stimulation-treatment-for-alcoholism-1.4729940
    Plummer had an illustrious career as a physician, researcher and the scientific director of Canada’s National Microbiology Lab in Winnipeg.

    He was an alcoholic. Undergoes liver transplant in 2014. Then in In December of 2018 is implanted two electrodes into brain to treat his alcoholism. The article about this seemingly successful treatment is written on Dec. 15, 2019. Then he dies suddenly on February 4, 2020.

    Frank Plummer, former head of the National Microbiology Lab, dead at 67
    https://winnipeg.ctvnews.ca/frank-plummer-former-head-of-the-national-microbiology-lab-dead-at-67-1.4797116?cache=%3FclipId%3D89926

    Replies: @Commentator Mike, @CanSpeccy

    Why are you making it up?

    Um, well not exactly — according to “anonymous sources”.

    Although health officials insist all protocols were met, anonymous sources report that the shipment lacked an agreement spelling out intellectual property rights, known as a “material transfer agreement,†according to the Winnipeg Free Press. The document would protect Canada’s claim over the viruses, assuming they had been patented through the Budapest Treaty deposit, an internationally recognized system for patenting intentions involving microorganisms.

    That:

    Dr. Xiangguo Qiu, her husband Keding Cheng and an unknown number of her students from China were removed from Canada’s only level-4 lab on July 5, CBC News has learned

    Suggests, at least, that the transfer of biological material from the Canadian lab to the Wuhan lab was not “licit”.

  • Prince Philip ” If I were reincarnated , I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels . We have no option ,we’re in for a major disaster.. If it isn’t controlled voluntarily , it will be controlled involuntarily by an INCREASE IN DISEASE …”nwo.fandom.com
    conspiracytruths.co.uk “The Georgia Guidestones , Agenda 21 [now Agenda 2030”:
    “Maintain humanity under 500,000…The Guidestones describe the new world order plans and the United Nations Agenda 21 [now Agenda 2030] and operations such as codex alimentarius which mirror this
    ideology of sustainable development through DEPOPULATION ”

  • @steinbergfeldwitzcohen
    @Ron Unz

    I’ve seen zero evidence that the Coronavirus is a bioweapon---Ron Unz

    Wuhan 400 has many factor gains.
    1. It is much smaller in microns so it can infect at a greater distance. Sars infected at 2-3 ft and Wuhan at 6-8 ft. Factor gain=3-4x

    2. R(o)= it is not like a regular flu. It probably has an R naught of 3-4.5. We are seeing this on the cruise ship outbreak where it spread like wild fire through either a poor quality plumbing system (no p traps) or venting or both. Serious gain in virulence from Sars. Just look at the lying CPC numbers of deaths. Even low balled this is making Sars look like a walk in the park. Death Gain.

    3. Asymptomatic: people carry it but don't show symptoms. The disease has a timeline among those who end up with a serious case of 3-4wks. The problem often occurs around day 10 with pneumonia. Another gain-->length of illness.

    There is also the fact that Pribright Institute patented (Europe and America) a coronavirus vaccine. That is hardly being mentioned.

    I suggest reading a transcript of Francis Boyle. He wrote the U.S. bio-weapons legislation in the 80's and was interviewed weeks ago by Great Game India.

    China has been hit hard for over 15 years. Sars, hxny avian and human flus, swine flus hitting their independent protein supply, etcetera ad nauseum. The Chinese have higher hygienic standards than Africa and India yet continue to get hammered.
    This is bio-warfare. The evidence for this is extensive. Proving it in a court of law? Probably not. However, the Chinese have evidence of drone attacks from the recent swine flu that show the drones were made by one injection mold. So, prior planning of 6+ months, along with physical evidence of one source of the drones and that it was a costly, industrial process NOT the work of a bunch of guys in a back yard garage.

    This isn't over. Zionist elements in U.S. government have decided that to maintain dominance it is simple to assassinate (Soleimani) and use bio-warfare (Wuhan). Neither of these types of actions are the work of rational adults in an open room. They are the actions of ruthless psychopaths who have infiltrated the corridors of power throughout our world.

    Replies: @utu, @CanSpeccy, @Adûnâi, @Wizard of Oz

    “This isn’t over. Zionist elements in U.S. government have decided that to maintain dominance it is simple to assassinate (Soleimani) and use bio-warfare (Wuhan). Neither of these types of actions are the work of rational adults in an open room. They are the actions of ruthless psychopaths who have infiltrated the corridors of power throughout our world.”

    If Americans had wanted to control the world, they would have conquered and exterminated Mexico by the 1890s. They would have conquered and exterminated the Philippines. They would have conquered and exterminated Japan in the 1920s.

    They would have dropped nuclear bombs on Rio de Janeiro, Cairo, Delhi and Singapore in the 1940s.

    Instead, Americans have cured the diseases of non-Whites, gifted non-Whites their own weapons and their own technology.

    And yet still the Negroes are screaming about how barbarous White man is! Truly, to shut that whining voice, either the Negro or the European shall perish.

    P.S. Why does your comment have a golden border?

  • @KA
    @Adûnâi

    ampant pro-Chinese propaganda in Western media regarding domestic anti-Chinese sentiment?â€

    Are you referring to the extent of the anti Chinese(leadership) sentiment of the mainland Chinese highlighted and exaggerated by the western media ?

    That makes sense .

    Otherwise the sentence doesn’t make much sense to me.

    Replies: @Adûnâi

    “Are you referring to the extent of the anti Chinese(leadership) sentiment of the mainland Chinese highlighted and exaggerated by the western media ?”

    No, I mean the general anti-racist rhetoric of the Western media. My question is this. How can you say the Western media are anti-Chinese if they will never condone building Auschwitz?

    Or this. How are the Western media anti-Chinese if they tell Westerners to let chinks cough in their white faces to prove said Westerners not to be “racist” against said chinks?

    But you are most likely a myopic anti-White “socialist” – a generic Christian who thinks America wants to kill all non-Whites (I wish).

  • anonymous[340] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:

    The novel coronavirus is very similar to another coronavirus found in bats (RaTG13). The two are >96% identical overall, and 93.1% identical in the receptor binding protein spike gene. Analysis suggest that both are naturally occurring viruses that likely diverged roughly 70 years ago, and that nCoV is highly unlikely to be the result of a recent recombination event.

    Peng Zhou, Xing-Lou Yang, and Xian-Guang Wang (Wuhan Institute of Virology):

    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2012-7

    Dr Michael Skinner, Reader in Virology, Imperial College London:

    https://www.sciencemediacentre.org/expert-reaction-to-two-nature-papers-looking-at-the-genome-sequence-and-characteristics-of-the-novel-coronavirus/

    Bill Gallaher

    http://virological.org/t/tackling-rumors-of-a-suspicious-origin-of-ncov2019/384

    Paraskevis D, et al. 

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/32004758/

    Coronavirus was not genetically engineered in a Wuhan lab, says expert:

    https://www.ft.com/content/a6392ee6-4ec6-11ea-95a0-43d18ec715f5

    It had been previously noted that coronaviruses in bats in China already had the potential to infect humans using ACE2 receptors.

    2015: A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283639823_A_SARS-like_cluster_of_circulating_bat_coronaviruses_shows_potential_for_human_emergence

    2018: Genomic characterization and infectivity of a novel SARS-like coronavirus in Chinese bats

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6135831/

  • @utu
    @CanSpeccy

    "illicit removal of biological material" - Why are you making it up?

    "Canadian officials say the shipment was part of its efforts to support public-health research worldwide. " - Nothing illicit about it.

    What however might be more interesting is the case of Dr. Frank Plummer:

    https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/canadian-scientist-undergoes-novel-brain-stimulation-treatment-for-alcoholism-1.4729940
    Plummer had an illustrious career as a physician, researcher and the scientific director of Canada’s National Microbiology Lab in Winnipeg.

    He was an alcoholic. Undergoes liver transplant in 2014. Then in In December of 2018 is implanted two electrodes into brain to treat his alcoholism. The article about this seemingly successful treatment is written on Dec. 15, 2019. Then he dies suddenly on February 4, 2020.

    Frank Plummer, former head of the National Microbiology Lab, dead at 67
    https://winnipeg.ctvnews.ca/frank-plummer-former-head-of-the-national-microbiology-lab-dead-at-67-1.4797116?cache=%3FclipId%3D89926

    Replies: @Commentator Mike, @CanSpeccy

    Utu,

    Frank Plummer

    An alcoholic running a lab handling deadly viruses? Did he drive vehicles too? Joker’s world.

  • utu says:
    @CanSpeccy
    @utu


    Francis Boyle seems to believe that the safety of level 4 labs (BSL-4) is not good enough and thus leaks are occurring.
    �
    At the Canadian Level 4 lab in Winnipeg, there have been several incidents of illicit removal of biological material, including material taken to the Wuhan lab. In another incident, a worker transferring to a job in the US was stopped at the US border, while carrying microbiological samples. So leaks from such labs do happen. And if someone accidentally infects themselves while working in the lab, maybe without even realizing it, then they could set off an epidemic.

    Replies: @utu, @SBaker

    illicit removal of biological material” – Why are you making it up?

    “Canadian officials say the shipment was part of its efforts to support public-health research worldwide. ” – Nothing illicit about it.

    What however might be more interesting is the case of Dr. Frank Plummer:

    https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/canadian-scientist-undergoes-novel-brain-stimulation-treatment-for-alcoholism-1.4729940
    Plummer had an illustrious career as a physician, researcher and the scientific director of Canada’s National Microbiology Lab in Winnipeg.

    He was an alcoholic. Undergoes liver transplant in 2014. Then in In December of 2018 is implanted two electrodes into brain to treat his alcoholism. The article about this seemingly successful treatment is written on Dec. 15, 2019. Then he dies suddenly on February 4, 2020.

    Frank Plummer, former head of the National Microbiology Lab, dead at 67
    https://winnipeg.ctvnews.ca/frank-plummer-former-head-of-the-national-microbiology-lab-dead-at-67-1.4797116?cache=%3FclipId%3D89926

    •ï¿½Replies: @Commentator Mike
    @utu

    Utu,

    Frank Plummer
    �
    An alcoholic running a lab handling deadly viruses? Did he drive vehicles too? Joker's world.
    , @CanSpeccy
    @utu


    Why are you making it up?
    �
    Um, well not exactly -- according to "anonymous sources".

    Although health officials insist all protocols were met, anonymous sources report that the shipment lacked an agreement spelling out intellectual property rights, known as a “material transfer agreement,†according to the Winnipeg Free Press. The document would protect Canada’s claim over the viruses, assuming they had been patented through the Budapest Treaty deposit, an internationally recognized system for patenting intentions involving microorganisms.
    �
    That:

    Dr. Xiangguo Qiu, her husband Keding Cheng and an unknown number of her students from China were removed from Canada's only level-4 lab on July 5, CBC News has learned
    �
    Suggests, at least, that the transfer of biological material from the Canadian lab to the Wuhan lab was not "licit".
  • CanSpeccy says: •ï¿½Website
    @utu
    @CanSpeccy

    On each of three occasions when Francis Boyle suggests that the virus was accidentally released from Wuhan lab he explicitly invokes the Occam razor meaning that he does not want to go to the higher level accusation (because of lack of evidence) which would imply deliberate release of the virus by (a) Chinese or (b) non-Chinese agency. Unfortunately the guy who did the interview failed to ask him a direct question about it.

    What is interesting that:

    Francis Boyle is pretty certain that the coronavirus was man-made. He believes that the vaccine already exists based on the patent held by Pirbright Institute (UK) (2019-11-20
    Application granted).

    https://patents.google.com/patent/EP3172319B1/en

    Francis Boyle is pretty certain that various farm animal epidemics from the past like the swine fever or the foot-and-mouth in the UK were caused by the man-made viruses or bacterias. However he does not speculate if they were release deliberately.

    Francis Boyle seems to believe that the safety of level 4 labs (BSL-4) is not good enough and thus leaks are occurring.

    This is the guy who did work on 2001 anthrax attack, where a bioweapon grade agent from American military lab was deliberately used and all he talks about is insufficient lab safety. He is holding back. He should be interviewed again.

    Replies: @CanSpeccy

    Francis Boyle seems to believe that the safety of level 4 labs (BSL-4) is not good enough and thus leaks are occurring.

    At the Canadian Level 4 lab in Winnipeg, there have been several incidents of illicit removal of biological material, including material taken to the Wuhan lab. In another incident, a worker transferring to a job in the US was stopped at the US border, while carrying microbiological samples. So leaks from such labs do happen. And if someone accidentally infects themselves while working in the lab, maybe without even realizing it, then they could set off an epidemic.

    •ï¿½Replies: @utu
    @CanSpeccy

    "illicit removal of biological material" - Why are you making it up?

    "Canadian officials say the shipment was part of its efforts to support public-health research worldwide. " - Nothing illicit about it.

    What however might be more interesting is the case of Dr. Frank Plummer:

    https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/canadian-scientist-undergoes-novel-brain-stimulation-treatment-for-alcoholism-1.4729940
    Plummer had an illustrious career as a physician, researcher and the scientific director of Canada’s National Microbiology Lab in Winnipeg.

    He was an alcoholic. Undergoes liver transplant in 2014. Then in In December of 2018 is implanted two electrodes into brain to treat his alcoholism. The article about this seemingly successful treatment is written on Dec. 15, 2019. Then he dies suddenly on February 4, 2020.

    Frank Plummer, former head of the National Microbiology Lab, dead at 67
    https://winnipeg.ctvnews.ca/frank-plummer-former-head-of-the-national-microbiology-lab-dead-at-67-1.4797116?cache=%3FclipId%3D89926

    Replies: @Commentator Mike, @CanSpeccy
    , @SBaker
    @CanSpeccy

    "And if someone accidentally infects themselves not even realizing it, then they could set off an epidemic."

    And lab accidents just like this have happened many times. You make a very good point and anyone that has worked in a bio lab knows this. The infected person is the biological dissemination device and a mobile delivery system too.
  • CanSpeccy says: •ï¿½Website
    @Ron Unz
    @CanSpeccy


    Here’ s the Francis Boyle interview, which is pretty amazing....Is this guy on the level, delivering US propaganda, or nuts?
    �
    Well, I remember seeing Boyle's name floating around during the original 2002 Anthrax attacks. Perhaps it's unfair, but he always struck me as a leftist anti-biowarfare activist-crank. My guess is that people like that are fairly easily for Intelligence services to manipulate.

    I listened to a few minutes of his YouTube interview, and he seems to be saying that the Chinese had a biowarfare lab in Wehan, which accidentally released the virus, perhaps after having stolen it from the US. Offhand, that seems pretty implausible to me.

    First, Wehan is a huge city of 11M, not exactly the most sensible location for a biowarfare lab. Would the US put its biowarfare lab in the middle of NYC?

    Second, the virus was released just before Lunar New Year, the absolutely most disastrous time for a release in China because of the hundreds of millions of people traveling, potentially spreading the virus to the entire country. If the virus was somehow *accidentally* released, what is the likelihood it would happen at the absolutely worst time?

    The timing of the virus doesn't fully rule out a natural event, but I do think it rules out an accidental release.

    Incidentally, I noticed that the WN/Conspiracy people at Red Ice had a show on the virus, and they seemed to suggest the PRC had *deliberately* released it to exterminate enough older Chinese people to save on future Social Security costs, which seems rather doubtful to me. Maybe somebody just gave Red Ice a financial big donation or something.

    Frankly, these totally absurd PRC-release narratives floating around on the Internet make me deeply suspicious that some Intelligence agency is orchestrating them, which shifts me a little further in the biowarfare direction.

    I have zero technical expertise in this area, but the whole thing seems very, very suspicious to me.

    Replies: @CanSpeccy, @SBaker, @Wizard of Oz, @mh505

    seeing Boyle’s name floating around during the original 2002 Anthrax attacks. Perhaps it’s unfair, but he always struck me as a leftist anti-biowarfare activist-crank.

    Despite apparent plausibility, he said one thing that suggested remarkable ignorance whereof he spoke:

    this was a DNA genetically engineered biological agent leaking out of Wuhan that has gain-of-function properties …

    but as anyone with the slightest familiarity with this and other corona viruses such as SARS knows, it is an RNA virus.

    Perhaps he misspoke. But then why was he wearing a cap during the interview? Sure made him look a bit of crackpot.

    he seems to be saying that the Chinese had a biowarfare lab in Wehan, which accidentally released the virus, perhaps after having stolen it from the US. Offhand, that seems pretty implausible to me.

    First, Wehan is a huge city of 11M, not exactly the most sensible location for a biowarfare lab.

    The US does not have a Level 4 Biosafety Lab in New York, but it has one in Boston.

    The Wuhan lab is China’s first, and currently only Level 4 Biosafety Lab. Completed in 2015, it is located at the Institute of Virology in Wuhan and said, in an January 2020 Nature article, to be “on the cusp of being cleared to work with the world’s most dangerous pathogens.”

    If work at the Canadian Level 4 lab in Winnipeg is anything to go by, that means working with biowarfare agents, the justification, naturally, being to develop antidotes.

  • Another human coronavirus, the one that causes common cold, also spreads most readily in winter, including the time around Chinese New Year.

  • utu says:
    @CanSpeccy
    @steinbergfeldwitzcohen

    Here' s the Francis Boyle interview, which is pretty amazing.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=373&v=TsyujjitOFM&feature=emb_logo

    Is this guy on the level, delivering US propaganda, or nuts?

    Replies: @Ron Unz, @utu

    On each of three occasions when Francis Boyle suggests that the virus was accidentally released from Wuhan lab he explicitly invokes the Occam razor meaning that he does not want to go to the higher level accusation (because of lack of evidence) which would imply deliberate release of the virus by (a) Chinese or (b) non-Chinese agency. Unfortunately the guy who did the interview failed to ask him a direct question about it.

    What is interesting that:

    Francis Boyle is pretty certain that the coronavirus was man-made. He believes that the vaccine already exists based on the patent held by Pirbright Institute (UK) (2019-11-20
    Application granted).

    https://patents.google.com/patent/EP3172319B1/en

    Francis Boyle is pretty certain that various farm animal epidemics from the past like the swine fever or the foot-and-mouth in the UK were caused by the man-made viruses or bacterias. However he does not speculate if they were release deliberately.

    Francis Boyle seems to believe that the safety of level 4 labs (BSL-4) is not good enough and thus leaks are occurring.

    This is the guy who did work on 2001 anthrax attack, where a bioweapon grade agent from American military lab was deliberately used and all he talks about is insufficient lab safety. He is holding back. He should be interviewed again.

    •ï¿½Replies: @CanSpeccy
    @utu


    Francis Boyle seems to believe that the safety of level 4 labs (BSL-4) is not good enough and thus leaks are occurring.
    �
    At the Canadian Level 4 lab in Winnipeg, there have been several incidents of illicit removal of biological material, including material taken to the Wuhan lab. In another incident, a worker transferring to a job in the US was stopped at the US border, while carrying microbiological samples. So leaks from such labs do happen. And if someone accidentally infects themselves while working in the lab, maybe without even realizing it, then they could set off an epidemic.

    Replies: @utu, @SBaker
  • @CanSpeccy
    @steinbergfeldwitzcohen

    Here' s the Francis Boyle interview, which is pretty amazing.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=373&v=TsyujjitOFM&feature=emb_logo

    Is this guy on the level, delivering US propaganda, or nuts?

    Replies: @Ron Unz, @utu

    Here’ s the Francis Boyle interview, which is pretty amazing….Is this guy on the level, delivering US propaganda, or nuts?

    Well, I remember seeing Boyle’s name floating around during the original 2002 Anthrax attacks. Perhaps it’s unfair, but he always struck me as a leftist anti-biowarfare activist-crank. My guess is that people like that are fairly easily for Intelligence services to manipulate.

    I listened to a few minutes of his YouTube interview, and he seems to be saying that the Chinese had a biowarfare lab in Wehan, which accidentally released the virus, perhaps after having stolen it from the US. Offhand, that seems pretty implausible to me.

    First, Wehan is a huge city of 11M, not exactly the most sensible location for a biowarfare lab. Would the US put its biowarfare lab in the middle of NYC?

    Second, the virus was released just before Lunar New Year, the absolutely most disastrous time for a release in China because of the hundreds of millions of people traveling, potentially spreading the virus to the entire country. If the virus was somehow *accidentally* released, what is the likelihood it would happen at the absolutely worst time?

    The timing of the virus doesn’t fully rule out a natural event, but I do think it rules out an accidental release.

    Incidentally, I noticed that the WN/Conspiracy people at Red Ice had a show on the virus, and they seemed to suggest the PRC had *deliberately* released it to exterminate enough older Chinese people to save on future Social Security costs, which seems rather doubtful to me. Maybe somebody just gave Red Ice a financial big donation or something.

    Frankly, these totally absurd PRC-release narratives floating around on the Internet make me deeply suspicious that some Intelligence agency is orchestrating them, which shifts me a little further in the biowarfare direction.

    I have zero technical expertise in this area, but the whole thing seems very, very suspicious to me.

    •ï¿½Replies: @CanSpeccy
    @Ron Unz


    seeing Boyle’s name floating around during the original 2002 Anthrax attacks. Perhaps it’s unfair, but he always struck me as a leftist anti-biowarfare activist-crank.
    �
    Despite apparent plausibility, he said one thing that suggested remarkable ignorance whereof he spoke:

    this was a DNA genetically engineered biological agent leaking out of Wuhan that has gain-of-function properties ...
    �
    but as anyone with the slightest familiarity with this and other corona viruses such as SARS knows, it is an RNA virus.

    Perhaps he misspoke. But then why was he wearing a cap during the interview? Sure made him look a bit of crackpot.

    he seems to be saying that the Chinese had a biowarfare lab in Wehan, which accidentally released the virus, perhaps after having stolen it from the US. Offhand, that seems pretty implausible to me.

    First, Wehan is a huge city of 11M, not exactly the most sensible location for a biowarfare lab.
    �
    The US does not have a Level 4 Biosafety Lab in New York, but it has one in Boston.

    The Wuhan lab is China's first, and currently only Level 4 Biosafety Lab. Completed in 2015, it is located at the Institute of Virology in Wuhan and said, in an January 2020 Nature article, to be "on the cusp of being cleared to work with the world’s most dangerous pathogens."

    If work at the Canadian Level 4 lab in Winnipeg is anything to go by, that means working with biowarfare agents, the justification, naturally, being to develop antidotes.
    , @SBaker
    @Ron Unz

    A couple of comments here Ron, the anthrax attack was actually in 2001 with the initial releases in the later half of September. The anthrax disseminated through the US mail was both crude and weapons grade quality, and that means the perp had expertise in weaponizing technology.

    I would be willing to bet a large sum that the Chicoms have an offensive bioweapons program and it might be sited in Wuhan which is where they have an institute of virology. The US has a defensive program but the offensive program was shut down in 1972 or so and the offensive bioweapons treaty signed by 126 countries including the USSR, that subsequently moved their operation underground. Ken Alibekov defected to the West in 1992 and told the story of the massive offensive program program the USSR had at that time--USSR dissolved and shut down their program sometime in the mid-1990s but where did those 100,000 scientists go and where did the tons of weaponized agents end up--were they destroyed? Are those scientists for sale?

    If I comment on the timing of this event it would be pure speculation, but I will anyway, since you made some good points about the timing. It does seem the near ideal time for a release, but why would they do the release in the city with the Chinese Institute of Virology? This would draw attention to the lab, which makes me think the release more likely accidental, and lab accidents do happen.

    The RNA inserts from the HIV virus demonstrate this novel CoronaV was not naturally occurring but something I would expect to see coming out of an Institute of Virology and your suspicions of a bioweapon have merit. This is not something ever seen in nature and 75% of human pathogens came from animals and 60% of emerging (new) diseases come from animals. The SARS and MERS coronaVs both have animal origins. An interesting story and somewhere lies the truth.
    , @Wizard of Oz
    @Ron Unz

    Another numbers problem I see in your reasoning here:

    "Second, the virus was released just before Lunar New Year, the absolutely most disastrous time for a release in China because of the hundreds of millions of people traveling, potentially spreading the virus to the entire country. If the virus was somehow *accidentally* released, what is the likelihood it would happen at the absolutely worst time?

    The timing of the virus doesn’t fully rule out a natural event, but I do think it rules out an accidental release."

    "Just the worst time" - but is that 1 day out of 365 or maybe 50 days out of 365 and then narrowed down by seasonal considerations to 50 out of 90 or so? So the equivalent accident could have happened several times but it would only be when it happened around early December that it took off. A bit like the arguments for and against Creation or mere chance (with or without multiverses) for the existence of life.
    , @mh505
    @Ron Unz


    The timing of the virus doesn’t fully rule out a natural event, but I do think it rules out an accidental release.
    �
    How can you be so sure? Accidents happen all the time no matter if the occurrence is highly unlikely or not.

    Look at roulette: how likely is it that the number 0 or 7 for that matter appears in a series, 5 or 6 times in a row (if memory serves, there might have been cases with an even higher series).

    Yet it happens frequently enough.

    Replies: @Ron Unz
  • https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
    Report from Hubei province for February 14:

    2,420 new cases (including 1,138 clinically diagnosed)
    139 new deaths (including 34 clinically diagnosed)
    54,406 cumulative total cases (including 16,522 clinically diagnosed)
    38,107 currently hospitalized, of which:
    – 27,955 (73.4%) in mild condition
    – 8,276 (21.7%) serious
    – 1,876 (4.9%) critical
    912 new hospital discharges

  • @steinbergfeldwitzcohen
    @Ron Unz

    I’ve seen zero evidence that the Coronavirus is a bioweapon---Ron Unz

    Wuhan 400 has many factor gains.
    1. It is much smaller in microns so it can infect at a greater distance. Sars infected at 2-3 ft and Wuhan at 6-8 ft. Factor gain=3-4x

    2. R(o)= it is not like a regular flu. It probably has an R naught of 3-4.5. We are seeing this on the cruise ship outbreak where it spread like wild fire through either a poor quality plumbing system (no p traps) or venting or both. Serious gain in virulence from Sars. Just look at the lying CPC numbers of deaths. Even low balled this is making Sars look like a walk in the park. Death Gain.

    3. Asymptomatic: people carry it but don't show symptoms. The disease has a timeline among those who end up with a serious case of 3-4wks. The problem often occurs around day 10 with pneumonia. Another gain-->length of illness.

    There is also the fact that Pribright Institute patented (Europe and America) a coronavirus vaccine. That is hardly being mentioned.

    I suggest reading a transcript of Francis Boyle. He wrote the U.S. bio-weapons legislation in the 80's and was interviewed weeks ago by Great Game India.

    China has been hit hard for over 15 years. Sars, hxny avian and human flus, swine flus hitting their independent protein supply, etcetera ad nauseum. The Chinese have higher hygienic standards than Africa and India yet continue to get hammered.
    This is bio-warfare. The evidence for this is extensive. Proving it in a court of law? Probably not. However, the Chinese have evidence of drone attacks from the recent swine flu that show the drones were made by one injection mold. So, prior planning of 6+ months, along with physical evidence of one source of the drones and that it was a costly, industrial process NOT the work of a bunch of guys in a back yard garage.

    This isn't over. Zionist elements in U.S. government have decided that to maintain dominance it is simple to assassinate (Soleimani) and use bio-warfare (Wuhan). Neither of these types of actions are the work of rational adults in an open room. They are the actions of ruthless psychopaths who have infiltrated the corridors of power throughout our world.

    Replies: @utu, @CanSpeccy, @Adûnâi, @Wizard of Oz

    Here’ s the Francis Boyle interview, which is pretty amazing.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=373&v=TsyujjitOFM&feature=emb_logo

    Is this guy on the level, delivering US propaganda, or nuts?

    •ï¿½Replies: @Ron Unz
    @CanSpeccy


    Here’ s the Francis Boyle interview, which is pretty amazing....Is this guy on the level, delivering US propaganda, or nuts?
    �
    Well, I remember seeing Boyle's name floating around during the original 2002 Anthrax attacks. Perhaps it's unfair, but he always struck me as a leftist anti-biowarfare activist-crank. My guess is that people like that are fairly easily for Intelligence services to manipulate.

    I listened to a few minutes of his YouTube interview, and he seems to be saying that the Chinese had a biowarfare lab in Wehan, which accidentally released the virus, perhaps after having stolen it from the US. Offhand, that seems pretty implausible to me.

    First, Wehan is a huge city of 11M, not exactly the most sensible location for a biowarfare lab. Would the US put its biowarfare lab in the middle of NYC?

    Second, the virus was released just before Lunar New Year, the absolutely most disastrous time for a release in China because of the hundreds of millions of people traveling, potentially spreading the virus to the entire country. If the virus was somehow *accidentally* released, what is the likelihood it would happen at the absolutely worst time?

    The timing of the virus doesn't fully rule out a natural event, but I do think it rules out an accidental release.

    Incidentally, I noticed that the WN/Conspiracy people at Red Ice had a show on the virus, and they seemed to suggest the PRC had *deliberately* released it to exterminate enough older Chinese people to save on future Social Security costs, which seems rather doubtful to me. Maybe somebody just gave Red Ice a financial big donation or something.

    Frankly, these totally absurd PRC-release narratives floating around on the Internet make me deeply suspicious that some Intelligence agency is orchestrating them, which shifts me a little further in the biowarfare direction.

    I have zero technical expertise in this area, but the whole thing seems very, very suspicious to me.

    Replies: @CanSpeccy, @SBaker, @Wizard of Oz, @mh505
    , @utu
    @CanSpeccy

    On each of three occasions when Francis Boyle suggests that the virus was accidentally released from Wuhan lab he explicitly invokes the Occam razor meaning that he does not want to go to the higher level accusation (because of lack of evidence) which would imply deliberate release of the virus by (a) Chinese or (b) non-Chinese agency. Unfortunately the guy who did the interview failed to ask him a direct question about it.

    What is interesting that:

    Francis Boyle is pretty certain that the coronavirus was man-made. He believes that the vaccine already exists based on the patent held by Pirbright Institute (UK) (2019-11-20
    Application granted).

    https://patents.google.com/patent/EP3172319B1/en

    Francis Boyle is pretty certain that various farm animal epidemics from the past like the swine fever or the foot-and-mouth in the UK were caused by the man-made viruses or bacterias. However he does not speculate if they were release deliberately.

    Francis Boyle seems to believe that the safety of level 4 labs (BSL-4) is not good enough and thus leaks are occurring.

    This is the guy who did work on 2001 anthrax attack, where a bioweapon grade agent from American military lab was deliberately used and all he talks about is insufficient lab safety. He is holding back. He should be interviewed again.

    Replies: @CanSpeccy
  • @steinbergfeldwitzcohen
    @utu

    I have to dig for that source but I can provide it.
    That source argues that swine flu attacks took place in rural areas over an extended period of time. Locals reported seeing drones and apparently some crashed and/or were shot down. Long story short: there is a body of evidence that the swine viral outbreak in Chinese agriculture was an attack on the food supply.
    Will the Chinese gather evidence, compile a dossier and confront the West? I don't know.
    Public opinion in China: it will be a tough sell to convince the Chinese their own government did this. Given the years of attacks on chicken, pork and people I doubt it.
    Wuhan is just the latest in over 15 years of bio-warfare.

    Replies: @Commentator Mike

    One would expect that Chinese authorities would have caught some of these agents releasing these biowarfare drones and unraveled the networks, started putting people on trial and executing them, showing us photos of the drones with explanations of the mode of action. I can understand that a lone agent opening a vial on some crowded street may go unnoticed but a network of agents operating these drone attacks would have surely been far easier to detect, identify, and apprehend. Maybe I’m wrong, but if these have been systematic attacks over a long period of time at various locations to attack many farms surely someone would have been caught by now.

  • utu says:
    @Ber
    @utu

    See the video at comment 188 to get someone's take on this.

    Replies: @utu

    The guy in the video is making the claim but w/o any source all I see is that he is planting the info about drones being all from the same source. To make such a claim somebody would have to have seen pictures of several drones captured in different place and provinces. He does not provide any source. Imo he is just flowing with the story helping it with small confabulations to improve the narrative.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Ber
    @utu

    I have read some kind of news by the South China Morning Post re farmers protesting or making a scene (forgot details) about the drones etc.
  • @Ber
    @Anonymous

    "This isn’t the United States vs China.This is Jews vs China – the only question is which Jews."

    Looks more like the bad Anglo cousins in this world are the main players. Of course some bad Jews are also involved. There are always baddies everywhere including Chinese. However more baddies appear to be in the West. Sad.

    Replies: @utu

    There are always baddies everywhere including Chinese.

    CIA —> Falun Gong
    CIA/Israel /Turkey —> Uyghurs
    CIA —> Kuomintang/Taiwan
    CIA/Israel —> India

    Lost of coronavirus anti-China propaganda and pseudo news originate in India.

  • @utu
    @steinbergfeldwitzcohen

    "the Chinese have evidence of drone attacks from the recent swine flu that show the drones were made by one injection mold." - I was trying to find confirmation for this claim but no luck.

    Replies: @Ber, @steinbergfeldwitzcohen

    I have to dig for that source but I can provide it.
    That source argues that swine flu attacks took place in rural areas over an extended period of time. Locals reported seeing drones and apparently some crashed and/or were shot down. Long story short: there is a body of evidence that the swine viral outbreak in Chinese agriculture was an attack on the food supply.
    Will the Chinese gather evidence, compile a dossier and confront the West? I don’t know.
    Public opinion in China: it will be a tough sell to convince the Chinese their own government did this. Given the years of attacks on chicken, pork and people I doubt it.
    Wuhan is just the latest in over 15 years of bio-warfare.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Commentator Mike
    @steinbergfeldwitzcohen

    One would expect that Chinese authorities would have caught some of these agents releasing these biowarfare drones and unraveled the networks, started putting people on trial and executing them, showing us photos of the drones with explanations of the mode of action. I can understand that a lone agent opening a vial on some crowded street may go unnoticed but a network of agents operating these drone attacks would have surely been far easier to detect, identify, and apprehend. Maybe I'm wrong, but if these have been systematic attacks over a long period of time at various locations to attack many farms surely someone would have been caught by now.
  • @utu
    @steinbergfeldwitzcohen

    "the Chinese have evidence of drone attacks from the recent swine flu that show the drones were made by one injection mold." - I was trying to find confirmation for this claim but no luck.

    Replies: @Ber, @steinbergfeldwitzcohen

    See the video at comment 188 to get someone’s take on this.

    •ï¿½Replies: @utu
    @Ber

    The guy in the video is making the claim but w/o any source all I see is that he is planting the info about drones being all from the same source. To make such a claim somebody would have to have seen pictures of several drones captured in different place and provinces. He does not provide any source. Imo he is just flowing with the story helping it with small confabulations to improve the narrative.

    Replies: @Ber
  • Ber says:
    @Anonymous
    @Ron Unz

    The theory has some merit.

    But according to Mike Pompeo it's a lot more then Lieber. A whole lot more. And not just academics. United States governors, predominately in sanctuary cities, who have been taking bribes from China and making individual deals.

    Why isn't it just as likely that Lieber and other US Jewish academics who hate America and are ideologically supportive of communism were committing treason against the United States and giving China intel on how to make a weapon against the United States?

    It's as if the House UnAmerican Committee and McCarthy never existed. Not only were they 100% correct in practically every case they determined treason, they massively understated the scale of the subversion.

    There are multiple accounts out of Canada and the United States of Chinese citizens and military personnel being caught stealing IP and biological materials.

    Isn't it just as possible that the type of Jews who supported the Soviet Union are now the same type of Jews trying to support China to destroy America?

    Or this is some kind of struggle between Israeli's who want to pivot to China, and those who have decided it's too risky. The Talpiot plan and Israel's integration into Belt and Road and giving China the Port of Haifa is a strikingly independent course of action vis a vis the 'special relationship'.

    Or, if Lieber is a good man trying to whistle-blow to China, why can't it be related to the theory that this is a City of London Corporation/Pirbright Institute event or test for generalized population control.

    It seems very cavalier to ascribe this to the 'United States' when there are so many more specific classifications that could be used. Like, Liberal Jews, or Israelis - after all, Israel awarded Lieber the Wolf Prize.

    It seems insane to deploy a virus that can mutate in the field with such a long incubation period in an international hub where it will infect all of your own populations. And there is plenty of chatter along with quarantine camps to support that possibility.

    Why would all these Communist ultra-progressive western civilization hating academics be the good guys.

    Maybe Lieber is a good man.

    But if there had been masses of Liberal Jews committing treason and taking money from Communists in return for intel and IP and they all got arrested... I'm sure the hapless goyim will cry copious tears and drown in sorrow.

    This isn't the United States vs China. This is Jews vs China - the only question is which Jews.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Ber

    “This isn’t the United States vs China.This is Jews vs China – the only question is which Jews.”

    Looks more like the bad Anglo cousins in this world are the main players. Of course some bad Jews are also involved. There are always baddies everywhere including Chinese. However more baddies appear to be in the West. Sad.

    •ï¿½Replies: @utu
    @Ber


    There are always baddies everywhere including Chinese.
    �
    CIA ---> Falun Gong
    CIA/Israel /Turkey ---> Uyghurs
    CIA ---> Kuomintang/Taiwan
    CIA/Israel ---> India

    Lost of coronavirus anti-China propaganda and pseudo news originate in India.
  • @steinbergfeldwitzcohen
    @Ron Unz

    I’ve seen zero evidence that the Coronavirus is a bioweapon---Ron Unz

    Wuhan 400 has many factor gains.
    1. It is much smaller in microns so it can infect at a greater distance. Sars infected at 2-3 ft and Wuhan at 6-8 ft. Factor gain=3-4x

    2. R(o)= it is not like a regular flu. It probably has an R naught of 3-4.5. We are seeing this on the cruise ship outbreak where it spread like wild fire through either a poor quality plumbing system (no p traps) or venting or both. Serious gain in virulence from Sars. Just look at the lying CPC numbers of deaths. Even low balled this is making Sars look like a walk in the park. Death Gain.

    3. Asymptomatic: people carry it but don't show symptoms. The disease has a timeline among those who end up with a serious case of 3-4wks. The problem often occurs around day 10 with pneumonia. Another gain-->length of illness.

    There is also the fact that Pribright Institute patented (Europe and America) a coronavirus vaccine. That is hardly being mentioned.

    I suggest reading a transcript of Francis Boyle. He wrote the U.S. bio-weapons legislation in the 80's and was interviewed weeks ago by Great Game India.

    China has been hit hard for over 15 years. Sars, hxny avian and human flus, swine flus hitting their independent protein supply, etcetera ad nauseum. The Chinese have higher hygienic standards than Africa and India yet continue to get hammered.
    This is bio-warfare. The evidence for this is extensive. Proving it in a court of law? Probably not. However, the Chinese have evidence of drone attacks from the recent swine flu that show the drones were made by one injection mold. So, prior planning of 6+ months, along with physical evidence of one source of the drones and that it was a costly, industrial process NOT the work of a bunch of guys in a back yard garage.

    This isn't over. Zionist elements in U.S. government have decided that to maintain dominance it is simple to assassinate (Soleimani) and use bio-warfare (Wuhan). Neither of these types of actions are the work of rational adults in an open room. They are the actions of ruthless psychopaths who have infiltrated the corridors of power throughout our world.

    Replies: @utu, @CanSpeccy, @Adûnâi, @Wizard of Oz

    “the Chinese have evidence of drone attacks from the recent swine flu that show the drones were made by one injection mold.” – I was trying to find confirmation for this claim but no luck.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Ber
    @utu

    See the video at comment 188 to get someone's take on this.

    Replies: @utu
    , @steinbergfeldwitzcohen
    @utu

    I have to dig for that source but I can provide it.
    That source argues that swine flu attacks took place in rural areas over an extended period of time. Locals reported seeing drones and apparently some crashed and/or were shot down. Long story short: there is a body of evidence that the swine viral outbreak in Chinese agriculture was an attack on the food supply.
    Will the Chinese gather evidence, compile a dossier and confront the West? I don't know.
    Public opinion in China: it will be a tough sell to convince the Chinese their own government did this. Given the years of attacks on chicken, pork and people I doubt it.
    Wuhan is just the latest in over 15 years of bio-warfare.

    Replies: @Commentator Mike
  • @Kim
    @d dan

    You are unaware that there was widespread cannibalism in some provinces during The Great Leap Forward? A little reading might be in order for you.

    65 million dead from famine in that little policy failure. These were deaths that resulted from an intentional policy. Note that there was at no time any famine in Taiwan. Because they did not intentionally attempt to implement communism.

    As for the comparison with Japan, Taiwan, Korea, etc, ha, ha, another dumb point. Firstly, these are small countries. Secondly, they have firm supports of US – economically, financially, militarily, etc. Thirdly, unlike PRC, they (except Korea) don’t have to fight various wars to defend their border. And finally, even under the sanctions of both superpowers, China developed its own nuclear weapon, nuclear submarine, satellite, etc, a burden that none of these countries need to bear.
    �
    1. Small countries that did not implement communism. None of the three, in particular Japan or Taiwan, is resource-rich in comparison with China, which has a large population but also a large land mass.

    2. China cut itself off from the world. It was intentionally attempting autarchy. And now that it has not cut itself off, it can be more prosperous. But the underlying point is, I suppose, that China's rise depended on the evil West and could not have been achieved without the evil West.

    3. What wars did China fight to defend its borders post 1949? Ther was alittle tussle with Vietnam. A spat with the Soviet Union. An aggrandisement in Tibet. Hardly big enough to hold China back. Or do you mean the constant threats against Taiwan's borders?

    4. China's technological progress strangely always lags that of the West. Funny that. Couldn't be because it always relies on technogical transfers of some kind (forced transfers, theft, spying, etc)?

    The point remains...the tyrranical and totalitarian system that dominates China is not responsible in a positive way for its current degree of economic prosperity. That is a result of Western forms of science and social organization. The Chinese aspects of Chinese government are in fact what hold it back.

    You may thank the West and express your heartfelt gratitude whenever you are ready. I wouldn't want you to lose any face.

    Replies: @d dan, @Biff, @last straw

    You are unaware that there was widespread cannibalism in some provinces during The Great Leap Forward? A little reading might be in order for you.

    65 million dead from famine in that little policy failure. These were deaths that resulted from an intentional policy. Note that there was at no time any famine in Taiwan. Because they did not intentionally attempt to implement communism.

    Capitalists are as likely implementing disastrous polices as communists. While the famine during GLF caused 16.5 million-30 million (2.5%-4.5% of the population) excess deaths in China, WW1 killed 20 million, or more than 4%, of the European population. WW2 was even worse: it killed more than 80 million worldwide, and maybe 40 million in Europe, more than 7% of its population. While the famine during GLF did have some natural causes (China did experience drought and flooding), both World Wars were purely man-made disasters.

    1. Small countries that did not implement communism. None of the three, in particular Japan or Taiwan, is resource-rich in comparison with China, which has a large population but also a large land mass.

    No, Japan is not communist, and it has an 80-year head-start over China since Meiji Restoration in 1868. However, that did not prevent it from making extremely bad decisions and bringing utter devastation to itself. By invading China and SE Asia, and initiating the Pacific War, Japan lost at least 3.1 million, or more than 4%, of its population. In addition, anywhere between 3 million to 14 million in Asia were killed by Japanese atrocities, depending on who you ask.

    2. China cut itself off from the world. It was intentionally attempting autarchy. And now that it has not cut itself off, it can be more prosperous. But the underlying point is, I suppose, that China’s rise depended on the evil West and could not have been achieved without the evil West.

    Nothing could be farther from the truth. China tried to establish good relations with those 3rd world countries that were not under the yoke of the West. They sent medical and construction teams to Africa. They played a rather active role in the early days of the Non-Aligned Movement. The west corporate elites had little intention to help China. What they liked was China’s cheap labor and potential market. I think they underestimated China.

    3. What wars did China fight to defend its borders post 1949? Ther was alittle tussle with Vietnam. A spat with the Soviet Union. An aggrandisement in Tibet. Hardly big enough to hold China back. Or do you mean the constant threats against Taiwan’s borders?

    The Korea War pretty much established China’s status in the international arena. China’s later development of nuclear weapons renders further actions unnecessary.

    4. China’s technological progress strangely always lags that of the West. Funny that. Couldn’t be because it always relies on technogical transfers of some kind (forced transfers, theft, spying, etc)?

    China has catched up or is already a leader in many fields: 5G, quantum communications, AI, supercomputers, satellite navigational systems etc etc. Not only that, China now has the world’s best academic institutions. It’s just a matter of time that China will pull farther ahead in many areas:

    https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01920-1

    It’s too late to accuse China this or that. The matter of fact is that industrial espionage is universal. Every developed countries developed by stealing other’s secrets. Only a fool will not do it. Only a hypocrite will criticize it. And only a looser will complain about it.

    The point remains…the tyrranical and totalitarian system that dominates China is not responsible in a positive way for its current degree of economic prosperity. That is a result of Western forms of science and social organization. The Chinese aspects of Chinese government are in fact what hold it back.

    China’s current government is a far-cry from the days of GLF and Culture Revolution. It will keep reforming, evolving, and improving. Time shall tell which form of government will be best for China in the future.

    •ï¿½Agree: Adûnâi
  • @Ron Unz
    @Anonymous


    What I think utu and some of the other commenters are suggesting is that there seem to be 2 theories that predominate, either that it was natural or a Chinese bioweapon, and that the idea that it’s a US bioweapon is just as plausible as the Chinese bioweapon theory.
    �
    Well, I've seen zero evidence that the Coronavirus is a bioweapon, but if it were, it would almost certainly be an American one. I'd put the odds that America built and released it as 10x or 20x more likely than China. The Internet is filled with enormous numbers of crackpots and shills, and anyone who claims it's probably a Chinese bioweapon has revealed himself as such.

    For example, there are some early indications that the virus is far more deadly to Chinese (and probably other East Asians) than whites. I'd say an American bioweapon would be much more likely to target Chinese people than a Chinese bioweapon.

    Second, China was the place hit, and it occurred during a time of high US-China international tension. A totally-coincidental bioweapon release by China is far less likely under these circumstances than a deliberate one by America.

    Over the last year, something like half of all China's domestic pigs, the main meat source of the Chinese people, have died due to a sudden outbreak of a different Swine virus. The close timing with the sudden outbreak of the human virus does seem rather suspicious.

    Just a few days ago, Whitney Webb published a fine article on America's long history of bioweapons research:

    https://www.unz.com/wwebb/bats-gene-editing-and-bioweapons-recent-darpa-experiments-raise-concerns-amid-coronavirus-outbreak/

    I'd say that use of a bioweapon under current world circumstances would be a totally insane policy, and normally I'd say that would almost rule out the possibility. However, America's government has already demonstrated that it's totally insane in lots of other things, so maybe the pattern fits...

    Replies: @utu, @ivan, @Wizard of Oz, @Ron Unz, @steinbergfeldwitzcohen

    I’ve seen zero evidence that the Coronavirus is a bioweapon—Ron Unz

    Wuhan 400 has many factor gains.
    1. It is much smaller in microns so it can infect at a greater distance. Sars infected at 2-3 ft and Wuhan at 6-8 ft. Factor gain=3-4x

    2. R(o)= it is not like a regular flu. It probably has an R naught of 3-4.5. We are seeing this on the cruise ship outbreak where it spread like wild fire through either a poor quality plumbing system (no p traps) or venting or both. Serious gain in virulence from Sars. Just look at the lying CPC numbers of deaths. Even low balled this is making Sars look like a walk in the park. Death Gain.

    3. Asymptomatic: people carry it but don’t show symptoms. The disease has a timeline among those who end up with a serious case of 3-4wks. The problem often occurs around day 10 with pneumonia. Another gain–>length of illness.

    There is also the fact that Pribright Institute patented (Europe and America) a coronavirus vaccine. That is hardly being mentioned.

    I suggest reading a transcript of Francis Boyle. He wrote the U.S. bio-weapons legislation in the 80’s and was interviewed weeks ago by Great Game India.

    China has been hit hard for over 15 years. Sars, hxny avian and human flus, swine flus hitting their independent protein supply, etcetera ad nauseum. The Chinese have higher hygienic standards than Africa and India yet continue to get hammered.
    This is bio-warfare. The evidence for this is extensive. Proving it in a court of law? Probably not. However, the Chinese have evidence of drone attacks from the recent swine flu that show the drones were made by one injection mold. So, prior planning of 6+ months, along with physical evidence of one source of the drones and that it was a costly, industrial process NOT the work of a bunch of guys in a back yard garage.

    This isn’t over. Zionist elements in U.S. government have decided that to maintain dominance it is simple to assassinate (Soleimani) and use bio-warfare (Wuhan). Neither of these types of actions are the work of rational adults in an open room. They are the actions of ruthless psychopaths who have infiltrated the corridors of power throughout our world.

    •ï¿½Replies: @utu
    @steinbergfeldwitzcohen

    "the Chinese have evidence of drone attacks from the recent swine flu that show the drones were made by one injection mold." - I was trying to find confirmation for this claim but no luck.

    Replies: @Ber, @steinbergfeldwitzcohen
    , @CanSpeccy
    @steinbergfeldwitzcohen

    Here' s the Francis Boyle interview, which is pretty amazing.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=373&v=TsyujjitOFM&feature=emb_logo

    Is this guy on the level, delivering US propaganda, or nuts?

    Replies: @Ron Unz, @utu
    , @Adûnâi
    @steinbergfeldwitzcohen

    "This isn’t over. Zionist elements in U.S. government have decided that to maintain dominance it is simple to assassinate (Soleimani) and use bio-warfare (Wuhan). Neither of these types of actions are the work of rational adults in an open room. They are the actions of ruthless psychopaths who have infiltrated the corridors of power throughout our world."

    If Americans had wanted to control the world, they would have conquered and exterminated Mexico by the 1890s. They would have conquered and exterminated the Philippines. They would have conquered and exterminated Japan in the 1920s.

    They would have dropped nuclear bombs on Rio de Janeiro, Cairo, Delhi and Singapore in the 1940s.

    Instead, Americans have cured the diseases of non-Whites, gifted non-Whites their own weapons and their own technology.

    And yet still the Negroes are screaming about how barbarous White man is! Truly, to shut that whining voice, either the Negro or the European shall perish.

    P.S. Why does your comment have a golden border?
    , @Wizard of Oz
    @steinbergfeldwitzcohen

    HiFor obvious reasons (though many commenters don't seem to notice them) I try to find material for raising questions within interesting probably contentious comments. Here I am struck by your reference to the Chinese having physical evidence (the mold they were all made from) of a single source for the drones. That cries out for elaboration. How many drones ended up in government hands? What proportion of the total would that have been? Above all, what was the inferred source? In what country? From what registered design or whatever? Oops, I see I have been anticipated.
  • Bioweapon spread on a foreign land…wait wait , I ve already heard this somewhere…Oh yeah I recall ! At the movie theater. “ALIEN COVENANT”. And the film was hmm…american. What a surprise. Not a proof but anoter clue.

  • @Adûnâi
    @KA

    "The immense venom with which some news media and online sources have attacked Chinese of duplicity and laziness dont surprise me"

    But how does that reconcile with the rampant pro-Chinese propaganda in Western media regarding domestic anti-Chinese sentiment? As folks say, "Let the chink cough on you to proof you are not racist". Or do you mean the anti-Party rhetoric? Because Westerners physically cannot utter a positive thing about any socialist party in history, this is nothing out of the ordinary.

    Replies: @KA

    ampant pro-Chinese propaganda in Western media regarding domestic anti-Chinese sentiment?â€

    Are you referring to the extent of the anti Chinese(leadership) sentiment of the mainland Chinese highlighted and exaggerated by the western media ?

    That makes sense .

    Otherwise the sentence doesn’t make much sense to me.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Adûnâi
    @KA

    "Are you referring to the extent of the anti Chinese(leadership) sentiment of the mainland Chinese highlighted and exaggerated by the western media ?"

    No, I mean the general anti-racist rhetoric of the Western media. My question is this. How can you say the Western media are anti-Chinese if they will never condone building Auschwitz?

    Or this. How are the Western media anti-Chinese if they tell Westerners to let chinks cough in their white faces to prove said Westerners not to be "racist" against said chinks?

    But you are most likely a myopic anti-White "socialist" - a generic Christian who thinks America wants to kill all non-Whites (I wish).
  • I’m starting to lose faith in science. Imagine that they discovered that Chinese tourists carry a deadly virus yet never discovered that all those millions of refugees crossing borders into US and EU illegally, without quarantine, are carriers of far deadlier yet undiscovered diseases, in fact of cocktails of known and unknown communicable and deadly diseases. Duh.

  • @9/11 Inside job
    countercurrents.org: " Western anti-Chinese propaganda exaggerates Coronavirus danger , creates panic " By Andre Vithcek
    "It seems racist paranoia is obviously at work here - remember all the fantasies about the Chinese women in Wuhan skinning snakes alive and slurping bat soup . Whereas , in reality , a big Chinese city is one of the safest places in the World." Slavoj Zizek writing in RT .
    BBC Report : "A report on the early stages of the outbreak by the medical journal "Lancet" said most patients who died from the virus had pre-existing conditions. Most people infected are expected to fully recover just as they would from the normal flu "
    globalresearch.ca :"America's 'Medical Deep State' .The role of the CDC " By Richard Gale and Dr. Gary Null : "During the past year, especially in recent months , the fear-mongering spewing forth from the CDC has become virulent. It is a classic Orwellian script . The recent measles outbreak...has been used to brainwash the public and reshape it into obedient livestock in order to increase vaccine compliance .Worse ,the DISINFORMATION campaign ignores everything we know about measles infection and the failure of the MMR vaccine."
    Former employees have tried to warn the public about corruption at the CDC and its conflicts of interest with pharmaceutical companies . Can we trust the CDC ?

    Replies: @9/11 Inside job

    “There are either 65,000 cases of COVID-19 or 47,000 . It’s down to WHO you trust and how you count” dailykos.com
    globalresearch.ca : “Politics and corruption at the World Health Organization (WHO) “: “One could say that the H1N1 viral pandemic , version 2009 ,has so far produced no more than a mouse .But what a fabulous show for the media! What a brilliantly organized panic!”By Pascal Sacre, translated from a French article.
    It appears that you can’t trust the CDC or WHO . Can we trust any of the numbers being reported about the number of Coronavirus cases and the number of deaths ?

  • Anon[137] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:

    An important paper has just come out with information about COV19. New research just published about says that men are dying at three times the rate of women. 4.45 vs. 1.25%.

    https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.02.10.20021675v1.full.pdf

    Men are also getting COV19 slightly more than women. Those who end up very sick from it tend to be older, and they’re more often male.

    71% of all cases are people between the ages of 30 and 65. Suspected cases echoes this pattern. This is what happened with the Spanish Flu is 1918, in which the middle-aged got socked hard.

    The report says that after January 17, more people outside Wuhan were getting COV19 than inside the city, using confirmed cases as a metric. The Spring festival and migrant workers are being blamed for spreading it. Migrant workers are more likely to be male than female.

    Since half of all Chinese men smoke, and only a small percentage of women do, this appears to be a major factor in the death rate. Even in normal circumstances, smokers get pneumonia at twice the rate that non-smokers do.

    I’m not sure Chinese doctors are asking if their patients are smokers. We do it here in the US, but this vital data metric is missing from China.

  • Anonymous[163] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous
    @Ron Unz

    The theory has some merit.

    But according to Mike Pompeo it's a lot more then Lieber. A whole lot more. And not just academics. United States governors, predominately in sanctuary cities, who have been taking bribes from China and making individual deals.

    Why isn't it just as likely that Lieber and other US Jewish academics who hate America and are ideologically supportive of communism were committing treason against the United States and giving China intel on how to make a weapon against the United States?

    It's as if the House UnAmerican Committee and McCarthy never existed. Not only were they 100% correct in practically every case they determined treason, they massively understated the scale of the subversion.

    There are multiple accounts out of Canada and the United States of Chinese citizens and military personnel being caught stealing IP and biological materials.

    Isn't it just as possible that the type of Jews who supported the Soviet Union are now the same type of Jews trying to support China to destroy America?

    Or this is some kind of struggle between Israeli's who want to pivot to China, and those who have decided it's too risky. The Talpiot plan and Israel's integration into Belt and Road and giving China the Port of Haifa is a strikingly independent course of action vis a vis the 'special relationship'.

    Or, if Lieber is a good man trying to whistle-blow to China, why can't it be related to the theory that this is a City of London Corporation/Pirbright Institute event or test for generalized population control.

    It seems very cavalier to ascribe this to the 'United States' when there are so many more specific classifications that could be used. Like, Liberal Jews, or Israelis - after all, Israel awarded Lieber the Wolf Prize.

    It seems insane to deploy a virus that can mutate in the field with such a long incubation period in an international hub where it will infect all of your own populations. And there is plenty of chatter along with quarantine camps to support that possibility.

    Why would all these Communist ultra-progressive western civilization hating academics be the good guys.

    Maybe Lieber is a good man.

    But if there had been masses of Liberal Jews committing treason and taking money from Communists in return for intel and IP and they all got arrested... I'm sure the hapless goyim will cry copious tears and drown in sorrow.

    This isn't the United States vs China. This is Jews vs China - the only question is which Jews.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Ber

    Isn’t it just as possible that the type of Jews who supported the Soviet Union are now the same type of Jews trying to support China to destroy America?

    The type of liberal and leftist Jews that might have been sympathetic to the USSR in the past are today firmly part of the American establishment and tend not to be very supportive of China, which they regard as illiberal and authoritarian. George Soros has made no secret about his hostility to China. Other prominent Jewish American liberal elites like Kenneth Roth, head of Human Rights Watch, are not supportive of China.

    Then there are the diehard Jewish socialists like Bernie Sanders, who are nowadays few in number and quite old. They tend not to be particularly interested in China, let alone supportive of it.

  • @KA
    @Ron Unz

    The immense venom with which some news media and online sources have attacked Chinese of duplicity and laziness dont surprise me but help to consider the possibility that they are just trumpeting the brilliance responsibility carefulness and innocence of the Western countries.
    Instead f accusing Lieber at this moment ,USA should have asked him regarding the threat to USA , shall have asked him to throw lights on stemming the tide of the outbreak and and shed lights on possible vaccine or other remedies. This was not the time to shackle him for a crime that are not out of ordinary or incongruous with American way of ding business .

    The worst part is the explicit message that China has released engineered virus to kill its own people.

    Replies: @Adûnâi

    “The immense venom with which some news media and online sources have attacked Chinese of duplicity and laziness dont surprise me”

    But how does that reconcile with the rampant pro-Chinese propaganda in Western media regarding domestic anti-Chinese sentiment? As folks say, “Let the chink cough on you to proof you are not racist”. Or do you mean the anti-Party rhetoric? Because Westerners physically cannot utter a positive thing about any socialist party in history, this is nothing out of the ordinary.

    •ï¿½Replies: @KA
    @Adûnâi

    ampant pro-Chinese propaganda in Western media regarding domestic anti-Chinese sentiment?â€

    Are you referring to the extent of the anti Chinese(leadership) sentiment of the mainland Chinese highlighted and exaggerated by the western media ?

    That makes sense .

    Otherwise the sentence doesn’t make much sense to me.

    Replies: @Adûnâi
  • @d dan
    @Wizard of Oz

    Thanks Wizard of Oz.

    China sacrifices a province, with its concomitant lose of GDP of easily 100's billions (bigger than the GDP of many countries in the world). Thousands of people are braving in the front lines selflessly, while around the clock everyday, I hear touching stories about ordinary and nameless Chinese's gallant battles.

    And what are all these for? They not only save China, they also save the world. Imagine if China let the disease spread like the way US managed H1N1. How many thousands will die? Imagine if it goes to India, Africa and other developing countries, how many millions will be infected? How much damage to the economies will it cause? How much misery is enough for people?

    China does not expect a "thank you" note from everyone, but is it too much to expect decent people to hold their words of despise for a moment?

    Replies: @thetruth, @Adûnâi

    “Imagine if it goes to India, Africa and other developing countries, how many millions will be infected?”

    Why would that be a cause for grief? The fewer subhumans, the better. Personally, I am delighted that the DPRK’s quarantine seems to be working.

    There is no humanity, there is nation. And nation is more than a sum of individuals.

  • d dan says:

    In a touching video from the rainy streets of Wuhan, a husband drives behind his wife, using his headlights to light her way to work at the hospital.

    The wife has quarantined herself from her family, worried that she may catch the coronavirus through her job and subsequently infect her husband and children.

    She stays at a hotel and walks to work each day.

    Since she refuses to get in the car with her husband, he’s decided to drive behind her each evening as she makes the trek to begin her night shift.

    The wife says that when she gets back from work, her husband has a cooked meal waiting for her at her hotel room.

    They never speak to each other in person, relying on video chat to communicate.

    â¤ï¸ SUPPORT WUHAN, SUPPORT CHINA â¤ï¸

    https://shanghai.ist/2020/02/13/wuhan-doctor-quarantines-herself-from-family-husband-lights-her-way-to-work-each-night/

    •ï¿½Troll: Tusk
  • KA says:
    @Ron Unz
    @Anonymous


    Lieber is a chemist, so you’d think he wouldn’t have much to do with viruses. But it turns out that he isn’t just an ordinary chemist but worked on nanomaterials and nanoelectronics that can detect viruses and pathogens released during biological weapons attacks.

    This Harvard Gazette article from 15 years ago discusses Lieber’s work in this area and its applications in detecting biological weapons:
    �
    Exactly. Frankly, I'd never heard of Lieber except as a chemist, but when I Googled his name plus viruses, a whole bunch of things came up. And he gets dragged off in shackles *exactly* at the moment the huge viral outbreak in China is reaching the national headlines.

    Seems like an *awfully* big coincidence to me.

    It really wouldn't surprise me if Lieber had been discussing the possibility of Coronavirus being a US biowarfare attack against China with some of his friends on the phone or Email and the NSA or whatever found out about it and decided to nip such academic speculation in the bud...

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Alfred, @utu, @Wizard of Oz, @KA

    The immense venom with which some news media and online sources have attacked Chinese of duplicity and laziness dont surprise me but help to consider the possibility that they are just trumpeting the brilliance responsibility carefulness and innocence of the Western countries.
    Instead f accusing Lieber at this moment ,USA should have asked him regarding the threat to USA , shall have asked him to throw lights on stemming the tide of the outbreak and and shed lights on possible vaccine or other remedies. This was not the time to shackle him for a crime that are not out of ordinary or incongruous with American way of ding business .

    The worst part is the explicit message that China has released engineered virus to kill its own people.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Adûnâi
    @KA

    "The immense venom with which some news media and online sources have attacked Chinese of duplicity and laziness dont surprise me"

    But how does that reconcile with the rampant pro-Chinese propaganda in Western media regarding domestic anti-Chinese sentiment? As folks say, "Let the chink cough on you to proof you are not racist". Or do you mean the anti-Party rhetoric? Because Westerners physically cannot utter a positive thing about any socialist party in history, this is nothing out of the ordinary.

    Replies: @KA
  • @denk
    Was Mike Ruppert another one suicided for knowing too much and dunno how to keep his mouth shut ?

    https://aanirfan.blogspot.com/2014/04/investigative-journalist-michael.html

    Replies: @denk

    Mike Ruppert was the author of that dead microbiologist article….

  • Was Mike Ruppert another one suicided for knowing too much and dunno how to keep his mouth shut ?

    https://aanirfan.blogspot.com/2014/04/investigative-journalist-michael.html

    •ï¿½Replies: @denk
    @denk

    Mike Ruppert was the author of that dead microbiologist article....
  • @Anonymous
    @CanSpeccy

    How do you not see that, from the perspective of the Trump administration's foreign policy objectives, the outbreak is a positive development?

    The Trump admin wants to reduce trade with China and promote domestic industry and supply chains. It also wants allies and neutral countries to reduce trade with China and to avoid engaging with Chinese companies like Huawei and participating in Chinese trade initiatives like the Belt and Road project.

    Whether it's man-made subterfuge or just a coincidence, obviously this is one of the best things that could happen for the Trump admin's foreign policy goals at this time, from a strictly coldly rational standpoint.

    Replies: @CanSpeccy, @Johnny Walker Read

    Wow, put the crack pipe down!!

  • denk says:

    a senior National Security Council official†warning about the implications of the rise of Huawei to become the world’s biggest supplier of telecommunications equipment and that it was leading the field in the development of 5G.

    “We are losing it,†the memo said. “Whoever leads in technology and market share for 5G deployment will have a tremendous advantage towards … commanding the heights of the information domain.â€

    The memo said 5G was “by no means simply a ‘faster 4G’†but was “a change more like the invention of the Gutenberg press†as it would bring faster speeds, lower lead times between the network and the device and had a much larger capacity to transfer data. [1]

    [MORE]

    “There’s a certain amount of desperation here as the U.S. government tries to figure out what do on 5G,†said Washington lawyer David Hanke, a former GOP congressional aide. Hanke, however, said Barr’s suggestion might be “the least-worst option†for dealing with Huawei, since the alternative would be permanent Chinese domination of the global market for 5G technology. [2]

    Trump ‘apoplectic’ with UK over Huawei 5G decision as US suggests taking stake in Nokia, Ericsson [3]

    The Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee heard from witnesses about the skills and training needed for workers in making fifth-generation wireless technology, so-called 5G networks, a widespread American reality.

    “Estimates suggest there are approximately 27,000 tower climbers prepared to install 5G equipment,†said Sen. Roger Wicker, a Mississippi Republican who chairs the committee.

    “However, it’s projected that 20,000 more tower climbers are needed to accelerate the deployment of 5G in order to win the race and secure the advantage in the United States.†[4]

    Despite the truce in the United States-China trade wars, the tech wars between Washington and Beijing are intensifying. Most immediate is the struggle over who will build the new, superfast fifth-generation, or 5G, cellular networks that will revolutionize the way we live by empowering the use of artificial intelligence and other cutting-edge technologies.

    Huawei is a name you should know.

    As China’s leading telecoms company, Huawei is the global leader in the race to build 5G networks, followed by the European firms Nokia and Ericsson. However, Washington is trying to ban Huawei from doing business with the U.S. or our allies for fear that the Chinese military could insert a “backdoor†into its equipment for spying.

    Yet, sad to say, the United States has no telecoms giant to compete with Huawei. This is as important a part of the story as the curbs on the tech company. [5]

    Re Wuhan bioweapon attack…
    Whats the motive ?

    1] hit China’s economy.
    2] Make the Chinese pariah of 21C
    3] Trigger an exodus of hi tech from China
    4] Force the Chinese to surrender in the trade war,

    We can now add….
    5] Stall or scuttle China’s 5g roll out, for which Wuhan is the pioneer.

    ———————–
    [1]
    https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2018/12/14/huaw-d14.html

    [2]
    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/feb/7/barrs-call-for-us-control-of-5g-providers-quickly-/

    [3]
    https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/07/us-should-take-stake-in-nokia-ericsson-to-counter-huawei-in-5g-barr.html

    [4]
    https://www.newspressnow.com/news/local_news/hearing-explores-creating-a-g-workforce/article_03a73e0c-3d50-11ea-be2d-ff99bf82351f.html

    [5]
    https://www.omaha.com/opinion/trudy-rubin-g-is-part-of-the-u-s-/article_239f4ea0-e517-5d74-8cc8-d7c3a671edb5.html

  • denk says:
    @Ber
    " ...discussing the possibility of Coronavirus being a US biowarfare attack against China ..." Quite probable. However what do you make of this below? (February 6, 2020 report) Thanks.

    "In a very strage turn of events, renowned scientist Frank Plummer who received Saudi SARS Coronavirus sample and was working on Coronavirus (HIV) vaccine in the Winnipeg based Canadian lab from where the virus was smuggled by Chinese Biowarfare agents and weaponized as revealed in GreatGameIndia investigation, has died in mysterious conditions. Frank Plummer was the key to the Chinese Biological Espionage case at Winnipeg’s National Microbiology Laboratory."

    https://greatgameindia.com/frank-plummer-canadian-lab-scientist-key-to-coronavirus-investigation-assassinated/

    Replies: @denk

    Frank Olsen was suicided cuz he knew too much about CIA’s Mkultra,

    David Kelly and friends were suicided cuz they knew too much about fukus ‘race specific bio weapon‘ program,

    My guess…..PLummer was killed cuz he knew too much aBout fukus ‘caper‘ in Wuhan ??

    almost 100 defence scientists died bet 2001 to 2005, many were bioweapoon experts like Kelly specialising in ‘genetic manipulation and DNA sequencing’,

    2003.
    SARS1 broke up in China , HK, Singapore, TW, ….

    2020..
    SARS2 looks another ‘Chinese‘ specific virus,
    How is that for ‘race specific’ ?

    Whats one more dead scientist to the satanists who rule fukus ??

    https://www.stevequayle.com/index.php?s=190

    P,.S.
    You’r prolly unfamiliar with Indian cow dung, which stink even worse than murkkan bullshit.
    Non of the assertions in that article were substantiated.

  • Ber says:

    ” …discussing the possibility of Coronavirus being a US biowarfare attack against China …” Quite probable. However what do you make of this below? (February 6, 2020 report) Thanks.

    “In a very strage turn of events, renowned scientist Frank Plummer who received Saudi SARS Coronavirus sample and was working on Coronavirus (HIV) vaccine in the Winnipeg based Canadian lab from where the virus was smuggled by Chinese Biowarfare agents and weaponized as revealed in GreatGameIndia investigation, has died in mysterious conditions. Frank Plummer was the key to the Chinese Biological Espionage case at Winnipeg’s National Microbiology Laboratory.”

    https://greatgameindia.com/frank-plummer-canadian-lab-scientist-key-to-coronavirus-investigation-assassinated/

    •ï¿½Replies: @denk
    @Ber

    Frank Olsen was suicided cuz he knew too much about CIA's Mkultra,

    David Kelly and friends were suicided cuz they knew too much about fukus 'race specific bio weapon' program,

    My guess.....PLummer was killed cuz he knew too much aBout fukus 'caper' in Wuhan ??

    almost 100 defence scientists died bet 2001 to 2005, many were bioweapoon experts like Kelly specialising in 'genetic manipulation and DNA sequencing',

    2003.
    SARS1 broke up in China , HK, Singapore, TW, ....

    2020..
    SARS2 looks another 'Chinese' specific virus,
    How is that for 'race specific' ?

    Whats one more dead scientist to the satanists who rule fukus ??

    https://www.stevequayle.com/index.php?s=190

    P,.S.
    You'r prolly unfamiliar with Indian cow dung, which stink even worse than murkkan bullshit.
    Non of the assertions in that article were substantiated.
  • countercurrents.org: ” Western anti-Chinese propaganda exaggerates Coronavirus danger , creates panic ” By Andre Vithcek
    “It seems racist paranoia is obviously at work here – remember all the fantasies about the Chinese women in Wuhan skinning snakes alive and slurping bat soup . Whereas , in reality , a big Chinese city is one of the safest places in the World.” Slavoj Zizek writing in RT .
    BBC Report : “A report on the early stages of the outbreak by the medical journal “Lancet” said most patients who died from the virus had pre-existing conditions. Most people infected are expected to fully recover just as they would from the normal flu ”
    globalresearch.ca :”America’s ‘Medical Deep State’ .The role of the CDC ” By Richard Gale and Dr. Gary Null : “During the past year, especially in recent months , the fear-mongering spewing forth from the CDC has become virulent. It is a classic Orwellian script . The recent measles outbreak…has been used to brainwash the public and reshape it into obedient livestock in order to increase vaccine compliance .Worse ,the DISINFORMATION campaign ignores everything we know about measles infection and the failure of the MMR vaccine.”
    Former employees have tried to warn the public about corruption at the CDC and its conflicts of interest with pharmaceutical companies . Can we trust the CDC ?

    •ï¿½Replies: @9/11 Inside job
    @9/11 Inside job

    "There are either 65,000 cases of COVID-19 or 47,000 . It's down to WHO you trust and how you count" dailykos.com
    globalresearch.ca : "Politics and corruption at the World Health Organization (WHO) ": "One could say that the H1N1 viral pandemic , version 2009 ,has so far produced no more than a mouse .But what a fabulous show for the media! What a brilliantly organized panic!"By Pascal Sacre, translated from a French article.
    It appears that you can't trust the CDC or WHO . Can we trust any of the numbers being reported about the number of Coronavirus cases and the number of deaths ?
  • @Ron Unz
    @Anonymous


    Lieber is a chemist, so you’d think he wouldn’t have much to do with viruses. But it turns out that he isn’t just an ordinary chemist but worked on nanomaterials and nanoelectronics that can detect viruses and pathogens released during biological weapons attacks.

    This Harvard Gazette article from 15 years ago discusses Lieber’s work in this area and its applications in detecting biological weapons:
    �
    Exactly. Frankly, I'd never heard of Lieber except as a chemist, but when I Googled his name plus viruses, a whole bunch of things came up. And he gets dragged off in shackles *exactly* at the moment the huge viral outbreak in China is reaching the national headlines.

    Seems like an *awfully* big coincidence to me.

    It really wouldn't surprise me if Lieber had been discussing the possibility of Coronavirus being a US biowarfare attack against China with some of his friends on the phone or Email and the NSA or whatever found out about it and decided to nip such academic speculation in the bud...

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Alfred, @utu, @Wizard of Oz, @KA

    Apologies for failing to detect Lieber’s interest in viruses. Your speculated connection to the Wuhan outbreak gains much plausibility. I blame my reliance on a single NYT article for my ignorance.

    As to the literate but rambling conspiracy theory of the “eccentric” American expat…

    https://www.unz.com/article/was-the-2020-wuhan-coronavirus-an-engineered-biological-attack-on-china-by-america-for-geopolitical-advantage/

    there were a number of red flags to prompt deep scepticism. I choose just the following to illustrate my point

    “Recent disease outbreaks that would seem to possibly qualify as potential bio-warfare agents are AIDS, SARS, MERS, Bird Flu, Swine Flu, Hantavirus, Lyme Disease, West Nile Virus, Ebola, Polio (Syria), Foot and Mouth Disease, the Gulf War Syndrome and ZIKA.

    In fact, thousands of prominent scientists, physicians, virologists and epidemiologists on many continents have concurred that all these viruses were lab-created and their release deliberate. The recent swine flu epidemic in China has the hallmarks as well, with circumstantial evidence of the outbreak raising only questions.”

    That some American living in China with no known relevant expertise can come out with such assertions perfectly blandly as though he can’t see the faintest scepticism to be answered does make one wonder what mental world he lives in.

    And, I have chosen this because it fits my doubts about some of your reliance on people whom you choose to endorse somewhat blithely for reasons not obvious. I shall return to the subject of your particular attachment to one “How” issue wrt the 9/11 collapses, namely the nanothermite residue attested to by a number of scientists you deem respectable enough.

    It is perhaps worth noting, on the potentially critical thermite question, that NIST’s response that the train of possession of what were said (contestably I note) to be nanothermite fragments in WTC debris was not clear. The scientists asked for NIST to repeat the tests on material it could vouch for, according to Wikipedia, but “NIST did not”. Although there was suspicion raised about the clearing up of the WTC site by a number of specialist contractors there appears to be nothing untoward proved concerning the speed or methods of the clean up. It is at least unproven that NIST would or should have micro material preserved and accurately sourced and labeled. Even the greatest 9/11 knowalls on UR make few claims to knowing that there were demolitions to be investigated as early as September 2001. While I track down further material let me observe that discussion with trial lawyers and judges might raise your level of scepticism about all expert witnesses (and look at medical research non replication and the problems with “climate science”). Also I note the way letters and articles signed by several academic colleagues get connected and published: e.g. Jones owes Smith his signature in return for an earlier favour; Black is junior enough to be delighted to be a signatory with White; Johnson will back anything Jackson does.

    Next stop is to go back and read thoroughly

    https://drive.mobisystems.com/sharelink/anZjZ3Vlc3RAZ21haWwuY29t.26ILk96Nnujh2fdfVXCgPW

    If you haven’t read it I think you should. And if you have and have, after careful consideration, dismissed its probative value for non-truthers I apologise.

  • utu says:
    @Ron Unz
    @Anonymous


    Lieber is a chemist, so you’d think he wouldn’t have much to do with viruses. But it turns out that he isn’t just an ordinary chemist but worked on nanomaterials and nanoelectronics that can detect viruses and pathogens released during biological weapons attacks.

    This Harvard Gazette article from 15 years ago discusses Lieber’s work in this area and its applications in detecting biological weapons:
    �
    Exactly. Frankly, I'd never heard of Lieber except as a chemist, but when I Googled his name plus viruses, a whole bunch of things came up. And he gets dragged off in shackles *exactly* at the moment the huge viral outbreak in China is reaching the national headlines.

    Seems like an *awfully* big coincidence to me.

    It really wouldn't surprise me if Lieber had been discussing the possibility of Coronavirus being a US biowarfare attack against China with some of his friends on the phone or Email and the NSA or whatever found out about it and decided to nip such academic speculation in the bud...

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Alfred, @utu, @Wizard of Oz, @KA

    https://www.nature.com/articles/424601a (2003)
    But not all of DARPA’s programmes are problematic. Many credit the agency with developing the Internet, and it has long been a favourite among bright researchers with unconventional ideas. “Compared with agencies such as the National Science Foundation, DARPA takes much bigger chances,†says Harris, who has DARPA funding to develop a thumbnail-sized fluorometer that can detect chemical and biological agents. DARPA’s generous funding and goal-oriented programmes allow researchers to “do more than just incremental scienceâ€, adds Charles Lieber, a nanotechnology researcher at Harvard University.

    Electrical detection of single viruses (2004)
    https://www.pnas.org/content/101/39/14017

    Xiaowei Zhuang, Charles Lieber, and colleagues at Harvard Uni- versity have detected single virus particles in real time by measuring conductance changes with nanowire field-effect transistors.
    https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ac0416766

    Xiaowei Zhuang – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xiaowei_Zhuang

  • @Ron Unz
    @Anonymous


    Lieber is a chemist, so you’d think he wouldn’t have much to do with viruses. But it turns out that he isn’t just an ordinary chemist but worked on nanomaterials and nanoelectronics that can detect viruses and pathogens released during biological weapons attacks.

    This Harvard Gazette article from 15 years ago discusses Lieber’s work in this area and its applications in detecting biological weapons:
    �
    Exactly. Frankly, I'd never heard of Lieber except as a chemist, but when I Googled his name plus viruses, a whole bunch of things came up. And he gets dragged off in shackles *exactly* at the moment the huge viral outbreak in China is reaching the national headlines.

    Seems like an *awfully* big coincidence to me.

    It really wouldn't surprise me if Lieber had been discussing the possibility of Coronavirus being a US biowarfare attack against China with some of his friends on the phone or Email and the NSA or whatever found out about it and decided to nip such academic speculation in the bud...

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Alfred, @utu, @Wizard of Oz, @KA

    Lieber’s expertise was in testing for the presence of viruses – hundreds of them from a tiny sample and in one process. A huge improvement over current methods. Others have tried doing that so he is not alone.

    A Medical Chip That Could Do 100 Tests on One Drop of Blood (2015)

    In developing countries, Claros plans to sell mChips for $1 each and the portable analyzer for less than $500. Many lab-based tests cost more than $100 each

    A Blood Test on a Chip. Claros Diagnostics has created the mChip, which can produce accurate test results from a single drop of blood in 10 minutes

    I am very interested in this area as I had a US patent (5,108,131) that would have benefited from such a test. My patent received the approval of the FDA as a “medical device”. I was thinking at the time of HIV but it is applicable to any TESTABLE infection or genetic condition.

    By testing directly for the virus rather than for anti-bodies, the test become much more useful for isolation purposes. For example, those with a negative test result on the ship at Yokohama could be immediately allowed to leave the ship and the others can undergo treatment if necessary. This would prevent those leaving the ship from getting infected and passing the infection on to others.

    Apparatus and method for controlling transmission of defects

    The point I am getting at is that bioweapons can be rendered less effective if there were a really rapid, cheap and accurate way of testing people and animals. I don’t think the Americans want the Chinese to be good at that. Obviously, the Chinese society is much better adapted at using such technology than anyone in the West.

  • Ron Unz (232.) says:

    “For those so interested, here’s a very long presentation of the Biowarfare Hypothesis from some American ex-pat living in China. He seems a little eccentric, so I wouldn’t necessarily take his verdict too seriously, but he has gathered together a wealth of seemingly useful information and links, and I’ve now republished his compendium on this website:”

    Was the 2020 Wuhan Coronavirus an Engineered Biological Attack on China by America for Geopolitical Advantage?

    Metallicman • January 27, 2020

    https://www.unz.com/article/was-the-2020-wuhan-coronavirus-an-engineered-biological-attack-on-china-by-america-for-geopolitical-advantage/

    That article by Metallicman was plagiarised (the 40% that’s not ‘eccentric’) from articles by Larry Romanoff that were published on Global Research. Dozens of paragraphs are copied verbatim without attribution.

  • @Tusk
    @Ron Unz

    I would imagine an outbreak would have the highest chance to naturally occur during peak travel periods, to me this doesn't really provide any information in regards to it being a bioweapon. With increased interactions between many people overlapping via travel a virus can spread through many potential hosts at once.
    i.e. https://pneumonia.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s41479-017-0026-1

    Considering that isolation and a quarantine are used to stop the spread of a virus, it is clearly unlikely that a pandemic would happen during a quiet and isolated part of the year.

    I certainly agree that if one were releasing a bioweapon this would be ideal to get maximum coverage but I simply can't agree that it really increases the likelyhood that it was, since a naturally occuring virus would have increased chances in the same environment.

    It also seems odd if this was just a "test" as some people allege. China would now have direct experience in organising and managing an outbreak, they can also plan for redundencies for supply lines and transport routes if hubs are taken out. Why would you deploy it as a test when it makes the real thing less effective? If they wanted to test the spread of a racial-virus surely America could deploy it in a majority Chinese area in America (as they have done in previous cases) and easily test effectiveness and allow for a clean cover up.

    Replies: @Alfred

    Why would you deploy it as a test when it makes the real thing less effective?

    The politics demanded a “solution” now – not in 2 years.

    Economic and financial sanctions are a form of war. By tweaking the exchange rate of the Turkish Lira, for example, great pressure can be exerted on Erdogan to do what they want him to do. That is why Russia moved its reserves out of the USD and much of it into Gold. The Chinese cannot do that as their reserves are much greater and it would bring down the world economy – on which they depend. The Russians can keep their economy going even if there is no external trade.

    The USA is essentially in a war against countries like Syria, Iran, Yemen, Venezuela, Russia and China. In a war, you cannot wait for the perfect tank or missile to be developed. You use what is currently available even if it is somewhat deficient. As anyone can see, this virus is doing ample damage to the Chinese economy and to the confidence of the Chinese people in their government. What more can they wish for?

  • @Anonymous
    @Adûnâi

    Like Jews?

    Everybody dislikes Jews purely because they're Jews.

    Nothing to do with behavior.

    How would western Christians fare in a China controlled zone if they didn't adhere to whatever Xi thinks should be in the 'socialist bible'.

    Binary thinking. China bad. Jews Good. No, both bad. One least worst.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/shocking-admission-who-advisor-says-coronavirus-may-infect-over-5-billion-people

    So the Americans used a virus that will attack themselves and all their allies and the entire world. Nice. CCP logic at it's finest.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/harvard-yale-under-federal-investigation-over-shady-foreign-gifts

    It is funny watching Jews and Chinese fight over who can retain their corruption best.

    Some were working together. Imagine having 100 academics on the Thousand Talents plan at Texas A & M alone, and only 5 declared. They're all going to go to Federal prison.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/sudden-militarization-wuhans-p4-lab-raises-new-questions-about-origin-deadly-covid-19

    Could easily have been China. China are corrupt, hubristic and incompetent enough to have pulled this off with aplomb.

    Blizzard should focus on getting anyone to turn up to Blizzcon and balance updates. They're going to go trannie and get bannie.

    In China vs International Jewry everyone loses no matter who wins.

    But yes, smart people observed a very clear change in narrative about China that occurred a few years ago. The Jews having sucked the marrow from the United States were going to transition to China. The same in Australia. They're inter-marrying (Zuckerberg) and learning Mandarin. But someone on both sides has decided no.

    Get your popcorn.

    Replies: @d dan, @Alfred

    They’re inter-marrying (Zuckerberg) and learning Mandarin

    Don’t forget the Australian/American Rupert Murdoch of News International fame. His ex is Chinese. He thought that he could expand his mind-control empire into China. But the Chinese did not play along.

    Is Rupert Murdoch’s Ex a Chinese Spy?

    When his wife had an affair with our very own Tony Blair, he had to divorce her. What a shame. A marriage made in heaven. 🙂

    Wendi Deng’s ‘love note for Tony Blair’ published

  • Anonymous[269] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:
    @Ron Unz
    @Anonymous


    Lieber is a chemist, so you’d think he wouldn’t have much to do with viruses. But it turns out that he isn’t just an ordinary chemist but worked on nanomaterials and nanoelectronics that can detect viruses and pathogens released during biological weapons attacks.

    This Harvard Gazette article from 15 years ago discusses Lieber’s work in this area and its applications in detecting biological weapons:
    �
    Exactly. Frankly, I'd never heard of Lieber except as a chemist, but when I Googled his name plus viruses, a whole bunch of things came up. And he gets dragged off in shackles *exactly* at the moment the huge viral outbreak in China is reaching the national headlines.

    Seems like an *awfully* big coincidence to me.

    It really wouldn't surprise me if Lieber had been discussing the possibility of Coronavirus being a US biowarfare attack against China with some of his friends on the phone or Email and the NSA or whatever found out about it and decided to nip such academic speculation in the bud...

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Alfred, @utu, @Wizard of Oz, @KA

    The theory has some merit.

    But according to Mike Pompeo it’s a lot more then Lieber. A whole lot more. And not just academics. United States governors, predominately in sanctuary cities, who have been taking bribes from China and making individual deals.

    Why isn’t it just as likely that Lieber and other US Jewish academics who hate America and are ideologically supportive of communism were committing treason against the United States and giving China intel on how to make a weapon against the United States?

    It’s as if the House UnAmerican Committee and McCarthy never existed. Not only were they 100% correct in practically every case they determined treason, they massively understated the scale of the subversion.

    There are multiple accounts out of Canada and the United States of Chinese citizens and military personnel being caught stealing IP and biological materials.

    Isn’t it just as possible that the type of Jews who supported the Soviet Union are now the same type of Jews trying to support China to destroy America?

    Or this is some kind of struggle between Israeli’s who want to pivot to China, and those who have decided it’s too risky. The Talpiot plan and Israel’s integration into Belt and Road and giving China the Port of Haifa is a strikingly independent course of action vis a vis the ‘special relationship’.

    Or, if Lieber is a good man trying to whistle-blow to China, why can’t it be related to the theory that this is a City of London Corporation/Pirbright Institute event or test for generalized population control.

    It seems very cavalier to ascribe this to the ‘United States’ when there are so many more specific classifications that could be used. Like, Liberal Jews, or Israelis – after all, Israel awarded Lieber the Wolf Prize.

    It seems insane to deploy a virus that can mutate in the field with such a long incubation period in an international hub where it will infect all of your own populations. And there is plenty of chatter along with quarantine camps to support that possibility.

    Why would all these Communist ultra-progressive western civilization hating academics be the good guys.

    Maybe Lieber is a good man.

    But if there had been masses of Liberal Jews committing treason and taking money from Communists in return for intel and IP and they all got arrested… I’m sure the hapless goyim will cry copious tears and drown in sorrow.

    This isn’t the United States vs China. This is Jews vs China – the only question is which Jews.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Anonymous
    @Anonymous


    Isn’t it just as possible that the type of Jews who supported the Soviet Union are now the same type of Jews trying to support China to destroy America?
    �
    The type of liberal and leftist Jews that might have been sympathetic to the USSR in the past are today firmly part of the American establishment and tend not to be very supportive of China, which they regard as illiberal and authoritarian. George Soros has made no secret about his hostility to China. Other prominent Jewish American liberal elites like Kenneth Roth, head of Human Rights Watch, are not supportive of China.

    Then there are the diehard Jewish socialists like Bernie Sanders, who are nowadays few in number and quite old. They tend not to be particularly interested in China, let alone supportive of it.
    , @Ber
    @Anonymous

    "This isn’t the United States vs China.This is Jews vs China – the only question is which Jews."

    Looks more like the bad Anglo cousins in this world are the main players. Of course some bad Jews are also involved. There are always baddies everywhere including Chinese. However more baddies appear to be in the West. Sad.

    Replies: @utu
  • Ron Unz (236.) says:

    “It really wouldn’t surprise me if Lieber had been discussing the possibility of Coronavirus being a US biowarfare attack against China with some of his friends on the phone or Email and the NSA or whatever found out about it and decided to nip such academic speculation in the bud…”

    I must say those were my thoughts as well. Perhaps I’m too suspicious of coincidences, but those suspicions prove too often to have been justified.

    And it surely does serve as a warning to many thousands of ‘research academics’ who are funded in one way or another by the Defense Department – as was Lieber in several projects. From this, I would deduce that he knew many things the authorities would prefer to be kept secret.

  • Anon[198] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:

    The latest update I’ve seen is that Beijing has declared martial law, and at least one medical school is sending its students to treat people at Wuhan. That means the infections have reached numbers so high in Wuhan that their doctor and nurses are overwhelmed.

    One aspect of the COV-19 is that the initial death percentage is going to be highest at the beginning. Why? Because people who are most likely to die in a pandemic don’t die at the end of it. Because these victims already have medical issues that make them more vulnerable to it, they go early. This causes a skew in the death ratio. As pandemic ages, the death ratio drops after the most vulnerable are weeded out.

    2-4% is the number that keeps popping up. In the beginning, I’m willing to bet the death rate is higher than 4%, but near the end it will be lower than 1%.

    One point that needs to be mentioned is that a study indicates the average person with COV-19 infects 5.5 people. It spreads before any symptoms appear. If you track down and quarantine people when no more than a single digit amount of people have the disease, you can stay on top of it and quash it. But Singapore and Hong Kong have at least 50 people infected, meaning they likely already have 300-odd people who are infected who haven’t been found, and who are currently spreading the disease around unnoticed. They’re screwed at this point. They can’t control it with numbers like that.

    Thailand, Japan, and South Korea are headed for major trouble if they don’t quash their cases in the next two days. They literally have no more than that amount of time to track down all the infected and quarantine them before it’s out of control completely.

    •ï¿½Troll: Ber
  • @Anonymous
    @Ron Unz

    Lieber is a chemist, so you'd think he wouldn't have much to do with viruses. But it turns out that he isn't just an ordinary chemist but worked on nanomaterials and nanoelectronics that can detect viruses and pathogens released during biological weapons attacks.

    This Harvard Gazette article from 15 years ago discusses Lieber's work in this area and its applications in detecting biological weapons:

    https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2004/10/sensor-detects-identifies-single-viruses/

    Two of the world’s biggest threats may someday be reduced by wires thousands of times thinner than a hair but capable of detecting a single virus. The specter of worldwide viral epidemics is always with us, so detecting them quickly offers the possibility of saving thousands of lives. The pathogens also can be stealthy biological weapons, making their positive detection a vital national defense requirement.

    “We want to find a single virus before it finds you,†says Charles Lieber, Hyman Professor of Chemistry at Harvard University. Tests recently completed in his laboratory show that these unimaginably thin nanowires can sense and distinguish between viruses that cause flu, measles, and eye infections. Lieber believes future versions will be able to spot HIV, Ebola, SARS, West Nile, hepatitis, bird flu, and other dangerous viruses.
    �

    Replies: @Ron Unz

    Lieber is a chemist, so you’d think he wouldn’t have much to do with viruses. But it turns out that he isn’t just an ordinary chemist but worked on nanomaterials and nanoelectronics that can detect viruses and pathogens released during biological weapons attacks.

    This Harvard Gazette article from 15 years ago discusses Lieber’s work in this area and its applications in detecting biological weapons:

    Exactly. Frankly, I’d never heard of Lieber except as a chemist, but when I Googled his name plus viruses, a whole bunch of things came up. And he gets dragged off in shackles *exactly* at the moment the huge viral outbreak in China is reaching the national headlines.

    Seems like an *awfully* big coincidence to me.

    It really wouldn’t surprise me if Lieber had been discussing the possibility of Coronavirus being a US biowarfare attack against China with some of his friends on the phone or Email and the NSA or whatever found out about it and decided to nip such academic speculation in the bud…

    •ï¿½Replies: @Anonymous
    @Ron Unz

    The theory has some merit.

    But according to Mike Pompeo it's a lot more then Lieber. A whole lot more. And not just academics. United States governors, predominately in sanctuary cities, who have been taking bribes from China and making individual deals.

    Why isn't it just as likely that Lieber and other US Jewish academics who hate America and are ideologically supportive of communism were committing treason against the United States and giving China intel on how to make a weapon against the United States?

    It's as if the House UnAmerican Committee and McCarthy never existed. Not only were they 100% correct in practically every case they determined treason, they massively understated the scale of the subversion.

    There are multiple accounts out of Canada and the United States of Chinese citizens and military personnel being caught stealing IP and biological materials.

    Isn't it just as possible that the type of Jews who supported the Soviet Union are now the same type of Jews trying to support China to destroy America?

    Or this is some kind of struggle between Israeli's who want to pivot to China, and those who have decided it's too risky. The Talpiot plan and Israel's integration into Belt and Road and giving China the Port of Haifa is a strikingly independent course of action vis a vis the 'special relationship'.

    Or, if Lieber is a good man trying to whistle-blow to China, why can't it be related to the theory that this is a City of London Corporation/Pirbright Institute event or test for generalized population control.

    It seems very cavalier to ascribe this to the 'United States' when there are so many more specific classifications that could be used. Like, Liberal Jews, or Israelis - after all, Israel awarded Lieber the Wolf Prize.

    It seems insane to deploy a virus that can mutate in the field with such a long incubation period in an international hub where it will infect all of your own populations. And there is plenty of chatter along with quarantine camps to support that possibility.

    Why would all these Communist ultra-progressive western civilization hating academics be the good guys.

    Maybe Lieber is a good man.

    But if there had been masses of Liberal Jews committing treason and taking money from Communists in return for intel and IP and they all got arrested... I'm sure the hapless goyim will cry copious tears and drown in sorrow.

    This isn't the United States vs China. This is Jews vs China - the only question is which Jews.

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Ber
    , @Alfred
    @Ron Unz

    Lieber's expertise was in testing for the presence of viruses - hundreds of them from a tiny sample and in one process. A huge improvement over current methods. Others have tried doing that so he is not alone.

    A Medical Chip That Could Do 100 Tests on One Drop of Blood (2015)

    In developing countries, Claros plans to sell mChips for $1 each and the portable analyzer for less than $500. Many lab-based tests cost more than $100 each

    A Blood Test on a Chip. Claros Diagnostics has created the mChip, which can produce accurate test results from a single drop of blood in 10 minutes

    I am very interested in this area as I had a US patent (5,108,131) that would have benefited from such a test. My patent received the approval of the FDA as a "medical device". I was thinking at the time of HIV but it is applicable to any TESTABLE infection or genetic condition.

    By testing directly for the virus rather than for anti-bodies, the test become much more useful for isolation purposes. For example, those with a negative test result on the ship at Yokohama could be immediately allowed to leave the ship and the others can undergo treatment if necessary. This would prevent those leaving the ship from getting infected and passing the infection on to others.

    Apparatus and method for controlling transmission of defects

    The point I am getting at is that bioweapons can be rendered less effective if there were a really rapid, cheap and accurate way of testing people and animals. I don't think the Americans want the Chinese to be good at that. Obviously, the Chinese society is much better adapted at using such technology than anyone in the West.
    , @utu
    @Ron Unz

    https://www.nature.com/articles/424601a (2003)
    But not all of DARPA's programmes are problematic. Many credit the agency with developing the Internet, and it has long been a favourite among bright researchers with unconventional ideas. “Compared with agencies such as the National Science Foundation, DARPA takes much bigger chances,†says Harris, who has DARPA funding to develop a thumbnail-sized fluorometer that can detect chemical and biological agents. DARPA's generous funding and goal-oriented programmes allow researchers to “do more than just incremental scienceâ€, adds Charles Lieber, a nanotechnology researcher at Harvard University.

    Electrical detection of single viruses (2004)
    https://www.pnas.org/content/101/39/14017

    Xiaowei Zhuang, Charles Lieber, and colleagues at Harvard Uni- versity have detected single virus particles in real time by measuring conductance changes with nanowire field-effect transistors.
    https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ac0416766

    Xiaowei Zhuang - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xiaowei_Zhuang
    , @Wizard of Oz
    @Ron Unz

    Apologies for failing to detect Lieber's interest in viruses. Your speculated connection to the Wuhan outbreak gains much plausibility. I blame my reliance on a single NYT article for my ignorance.

    As to the literate but rambling conspiracy theory of the "eccentric" American expat...

    https://www.unz.com/article/was-the-2020-wuhan-coronavirus-an-engineered-biological-attack-on-china-by-america-for-geopolitical-advantage/

    there were a number of red flags to prompt deep scepticism. I choose just the following to illustrate my point

    "Recent disease outbreaks that would seem to possibly qualify as potential bio-warfare agents are AIDS, SARS, MERS, Bird Flu, Swine Flu, Hantavirus, Lyme Disease, West Nile Virus, Ebola, Polio (Syria), Foot and Mouth Disease, the Gulf War Syndrome and ZIKA.

    In fact, thousands of prominent scientists, physicians, virologists and epidemiologists on many continents have concurred that all these viruses were lab-created and their release deliberate. The recent swine flu epidemic in China has the hallmarks as well, with circumstantial evidence of the outbreak raising only questions."

    That some American living in China with no known relevant expertise can come out with such assertions perfectly blandly as though he can't see the faintest scepticism to be answered does make one wonder what mental world he lives in.

    And, I have chosen this because it fits my doubts about some of your reliance on people whom you choose to endorse somewhat blithely for reasons not obvious. I shall return to the subject of your particular attachment to one "How" issue wrt the 9/11 collapses, namely the nanothermite residue attested to by a number of scientists you deem respectable enough.

    It is perhaps worth noting, on the potentially critical thermite question, that NIST's response that the train of possession of what were said (contestably I note) to be nanothermite fragments in WTC debris was not clear. The scientists asked for NIST to repeat the tests on material it could vouch for, according to Wikipedia, but "NIST did not". Although there was suspicion raised about the clearing up of the WTC site by a number of specialist contractors there appears to be nothing untoward proved concerning the speed or methods of the clean up. It is at least unproven that NIST would or should have micro material preserved and accurately sourced and labeled. Even the greatest 9/11 knowalls on UR make few claims to knowing that there were demolitions to be investigated as early as September 2001. While I track down further material let me observe that discussion with trial lawyers and judges might raise your level of scepticism about all expert witnesses (and look at medical research non replication and the problems with "climate science"). Also I note the way letters and articles signed by several academic colleagues get connected and published: e.g. Jones owes Smith his signature in return for an earlier favour; Black is junior enough to be delighted to be a signatory with White; Johnson will back anything Jackson does.

    Next stop is to go back and read thoroughly

    https://drive.mobisystems.com/sharelink/anZjZ3Vlc3RAZ21haWwuY29t.26ILk96Nnujh2fdfVXCgPW

    If you haven't read it I think you should. And if you have and have, after careful consideration, dismissed its probative value for non-truthers I apologise.
    , @KA
    @Ron Unz

    The immense venom with which some news media and online sources have attacked Chinese of duplicity and laziness dont surprise me but help to consider the possibility that they are just trumpeting the brilliance responsibility carefulness and innocence of the Western countries.
    Instead f accusing Lieber at this moment ,USA should have asked him regarding the threat to USA , shall have asked him to throw lights on stemming the tide of the outbreak and and shed lights on possible vaccine or other remedies. This was not the time to shackle him for a crime that are not out of ordinary or incongruous with American way of ding business .

    The worst part is the explicit message that China has released engineered virus to kill its own people.

    Replies: @Adûnâi
  • Anonymous[409] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:
    @Ron Unz
    @Wizard of Oz


    “Shackledâ€!! I was so surprised I had to check, but, yes, it’s the good ol’ USA and Harvard Professors have no right to expect less humiliation than everyday muggers.
    �
    That raises an interesting point...

    America has been around for nearly 250 years, and I'm wondering whether this is the first time in our entire national history that a mainstream academic has been dragged off in chains...

    And by the most astonishing coincidence, it happens to a top Harvard professor with huge expertise in viruses and personal links to China at exactly the same time that an enormously deadly and somewhat mysterious viral outbreak occurs in China...

    Hmmm...

    Replies: @Ron Unz, @Wizard of Oz, @Anonymous

    Lieber is a chemist, so you’d think he wouldn’t have much to do with viruses. But it turns out that he isn’t just an ordinary chemist but worked on nanomaterials and nanoelectronics that can detect viruses and pathogens released during biological weapons attacks.

    This Harvard Gazette article from 15 years ago discusses Lieber’s work in this area and its applications in detecting biological weapons:

    https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2004/10/sensor-detects-identifies-single-viruses/

    Two of the world’s biggest threats may someday be reduced by wires thousands of times thinner than a hair but capable of detecting a single virus. The specter of worldwide viral epidemics is always with us, so detecting them quickly offers the possibility of saving thousands of lives. The pathogens also can be stealthy biological weapons, making their positive detection a vital national defense requirement.

    “We want to find a single virus before it finds you,†says Charles Lieber, Hyman Professor of Chemistry at Harvard University. Tests recently completed in his laboratory show that these unimaginably thin nanowires can sense and distinguish between viruses that cause flu, measles, and eye infections. Lieber believes future versions will be able to spot HIV, Ebola, SARS, West Nile, hepatitis, bird flu, and other dangerous viruses.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Ron Unz
    @Anonymous


    Lieber is a chemist, so you’d think he wouldn’t have much to do with viruses. But it turns out that he isn’t just an ordinary chemist but worked on nanomaterials and nanoelectronics that can detect viruses and pathogens released during biological weapons attacks.

    This Harvard Gazette article from 15 years ago discusses Lieber’s work in this area and its applications in detecting biological weapons:
    �
    Exactly. Frankly, I'd never heard of Lieber except as a chemist, but when I Googled his name plus viruses, a whole bunch of things came up. And he gets dragged off in shackles *exactly* at the moment the huge viral outbreak in China is reaching the national headlines.

    Seems like an *awfully* big coincidence to me.

    It really wouldn't surprise me if Lieber had been discussing the possibility of Coronavirus being a US biowarfare attack against China with some of his friends on the phone or Email and the NSA or whatever found out about it and decided to nip such academic speculation in the bud...

    Replies: @Anonymous, @Alfred, @utu, @Wizard of Oz, @KA
  • @Ron Unz
    @Wizard of Oz


    “Shackledâ€!! I was so surprised I had to check, but, yes, it’s the good ol’ USA and Harvard Professors have no right to expect less humiliation than everyday muggers.
    �
    That raises an interesting point...

    America has been around for nearly 250 years, and I'm wondering whether this is the first time in our entire national history that a mainstream academic has been dragged off in chains...

    And by the most astonishing coincidence, it happens to a top Harvard professor with huge expertise in viruses and personal links to China at exactly the same time that an enormously deadly and somewhat mysterious viral outbreak occurs in China...

    Hmmm...

    Replies: @Ron Unz, @Wizard of Oz, @Anonymous

    It would indeed be surprising if the FBI man with a geopolitical opinion he thinks we should know about who features in the following linked article did not see particular advantage in arresting and prosecuting someone as distinguished as Charles Lieber.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/28/us/charles-lieber-harvard.html

    However there is reason to doubt that the coronavirus outbreak is more than coincidental given the dates and other cases mentioned in that article AND having regard to the fact that your statement about Lieber having special knowledge of viruses may be wrong. I draw your attention to the following two quotes from the NY Times article:

    “Dr. Lieber, a leader in the field of nanoscale electronics”

    “[In 2017] he earned the N.I.H. Director’s Pioneer Award for inventing syringe-injectable mesh electronics that can integrate with the brain.”

    If anyone wanted to find an example of a mainstream academic being dragged off in chains over the last 250 years I would start searching for events covering Germans and 1917 [Einstein would probably have been nabbed if already at Princeton] ,Japanese and WW2, and wife murdering professors….

  • Anon[198] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:
    @Tom Welsh
    "I was laughing that this author implies Westerners are crackpots because they think China unleashed a bioweapon on its own people, whereas pro-China shills are out here saying it’s a US bioweapon".

    I am delighted to award you the prize for "most blatant poisoning of the well" on this thread.

    Replies: @Tusk, @Anon

    I’ve heard the theory that the virus was developed China as a way of testing vaccines, and I suspect that may well be true, and the virus escaped from the lab by accident. The problem is, the Chinese have a very cavalier attitude towards germs. They spit on the street, etc., and care little about cleanliness.

    Normally, anything a person develops as a weapon by government order would normally never be unleashed against the people controlled by that government. That can lead to revolution. But accidents can and do happen.

    China’s history is filled with an incredible amount of own goals. They screw up to a degree that really isn’t normal. The only other country in Southeast Asia that’s run by bigger idiots is North Korea. All the others seem to do better than China and North Korea, or end up tormenting their own people less.

    I think the potential of the Chinese to function as a modern people in a modern society is definitely lower than you would expect. Modern culture is something they imported. They didn’t grow it naturally the way the West did, and the Chinese aren’t well adapted to it. They’re still peasants at heart.

    •ï¿½Troll: utu
  • @Ron Unz
    @Wizard of Oz


    “Shackledâ€!! I was so surprised I had to check, but, yes, it’s the good ol’ USA and Harvard Professors have no right to expect less humiliation than everyday muggers.
    �
    That raises an interesting point...

    America has been around for nearly 250 years, and I'm wondering whether this is the first time in our entire national history that a mainstream academic has been dragged off in chains...

    And by the most astonishing coincidence, it happens to a top Harvard professor with huge expertise in viruses and personal links to China at exactly the same time that an enormously deadly and somewhat mysterious viral outbreak occurs in China...

    Hmmm...

    Replies: @Ron Unz, @Wizard of Oz, @Anonymous

    For those so interested, here’s a very long presentation of the Biowarfare Hypothesis from some American ex-pat living in China. He seems a little eccentric, so I wouldn’t necessarily take his verdict too seriously, but he has gathered together a wealth of seemingly useful information and links, and I’ve now republished his compendium on this website:

    https://www.unz.com/article/was-the-2020-wuhan-coronavirus-an-engineered-biological-attack-on-china-by-america-for-geopolitical-advantage/

    •ï¿½Thanks: utu
  • @d dan
    @Wizard of Oz

    Thanks Wizard of Oz.

    China sacrifices a province, with its concomitant lose of GDP of easily 100's billions (bigger than the GDP of many countries in the world). Thousands of people are braving in the front lines selflessly, while around the clock everyday, I hear touching stories about ordinary and nameless Chinese's gallant battles.

    And what are all these for? They not only save China, they also save the world. Imagine if China let the disease spread like the way US managed H1N1. How many thousands will die? Imagine if it goes to India, Africa and other developing countries, how many millions will be infected? How much damage to the economies will it cause? How much misery is enough for people?

    China does not expect a "thank you" note from everyone, but is it too much to expect decent people to hold their words of despise for a moment?

    Replies: @thetruth, @Adûnâi

    thank you, well said.

    Bloomberg has an article “China Sacrifices a Province to Save the World From Coronavirus”
    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-02-05/china-sacrifices-a-province-to-save-the-world-from-coronavirus

  • @d dan
    @utu


    "However, China is not forthcoming and not showing the full scope of what is happening. It is typical for any authoritarian system that perceives openness as weakness. If China wants to change the tone of the narrative it must shows its weakness and vulnerability and start asking for help."
    �
    If you (or anyone) want to help, go ahead to send in your donation or volunteer to help in Wuhan/China, like what many people from many countries (including Russia, Japan, Iran...) have already done. Why do you need to wait for China to "start asking for help"? Oh, yes, except to show your superiority or to humiliate them at their difficult time? Or maybe you are not really interested to help?

    Wait, silly me. Reading your post again, you are not talking about help in donation, medical help or bio research, but you want to help China in those areas you THINK China needs help, like not being "authoritarian" or "openness", or perhaps "freedom" of this or "freedom" of that. Those are the types of help China should ask.

    Caught another hypocrite schadenfreunde.

    Replies: @thetruth

    The U.S. gov. has been trying so hard to launch a color revolution in China, ALL failed miserably. So now they are using this opportunity to fulfill their dream. They can go kiss their dream goodbye.
    NOT in a hundred year they could be successful in changing the political system in China. The reason is, vast majority of Chinese are happy with China’s current political system!

  • KA says:

    From April 12, 2009 to April 10, 2010, CDC estimated there were 60.8 million cases (range: 43.3-89.3 million), 274,304 hospitalizations (range: 195,086-402,719), and 12,469 deaths (range: 8868-18,306) in the United States due to the (H1N1)pdm09 virus

    Additionally, CDC estimated that 151,700-575,400 people worldwide died from (H1N1)pdm09 virus infection during the first year the virus circulated.**

    https://www.cdc.gov/flu/pandemic-resources/2009-h1n1-pandemic.html

  • @Wizard of Oz
    @Ron Unz

    "Shackled"!! I was so surprised I had to check, but, yes, it's the good ol' USA and Harvard Professors have no right to expect less humiliation than everyday muggers. In so far as it's a case of financial crime maybe someone was looking to catch up on Harvard after seeing Larry Summers get away scot free.

    A warning shot? Fortunately I see the response of at least a few thousand of America's "ordinary professors" who read the arrest as a warning as quite likely to cook up provocations which would make the FBI or whatever look pretty silly.

    Replies: @Ron Unz

    “Shackledâ€!! I was so surprised I had to check, but, yes, it’s the good ol’ USA and Harvard Professors have no right to expect less humiliation than everyday muggers.

    That raises an interesting point…

    America has been around for nearly 250 years, and I’m wondering whether this is the first time in our entire national history that a mainstream academic has been dragged off in chains…

    And by the most astonishing coincidence, it happens to a top Harvard professor with huge expertise in viruses and personal links to China at exactly the same time that an enormously deadly and somewhat mysterious viral outbreak occurs in China…

    Hmmm…

    •ï¿½Replies: @Ron Unz
    @Ron Unz

    For those so interested, here's a very long presentation of the Biowarfare Hypothesis from some American ex-pat living in China. He seems a little eccentric, so I wouldn't necessarily take his verdict too seriously, but he has gathered together a wealth of seemingly useful information and links, and I've now republished his compendium on this website:

    https://www.unz.com/article/was-the-2020-wuhan-coronavirus-an-engineered-biological-attack-on-china-by-america-for-geopolitical-advantage/
    , @Wizard of Oz
    @Ron Unz

    It would indeed be surprising if the FBI man with a geopolitical opinion he thinks we should know about who features in the following linked article did not see particular advantage in arresting and prosecuting someone as distinguished as Charles Lieber.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/28/us/charles-lieber-harvard.html

    However there is reason to doubt that the coronavirus outbreak is more than coincidental given the dates and other cases mentioned in that article AND having regard to the fact that your statement about Lieber having special knowledge of viruses may be wrong. I draw your attention to the following two quotes from the NY Times article:

    "Dr. Lieber, a leader in the field of nanoscale electronics"

    "[In 2017] he earned the N.I.H. Director’s Pioneer Award for inventing syringe-injectable mesh electronics that can integrate with the brain."

    If anyone wanted to find an example of a mainstream academic being dragged off in chains over the last 250 years I would start searching for events covering Germans and 1917 [Einstein would probably have been nabbed if already at Princeton] ,Japanese and WW2, and wife murdering professors....
    , @Anonymous
    @Ron Unz

    Lieber is a chemist, so you'd think he wouldn't have much to do with viruses. But it turns out that he isn't just an ordinary chemist but worked on nanomaterials and nanoelectronics that can detect viruses and pathogens released during biological weapons attacks.

    This Harvard Gazette article from 15 years ago discusses Lieber's work in this area and its applications in detecting biological weapons:

    https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2004/10/sensor-detects-identifies-single-viruses/

    Two of the world’s biggest threats may someday be reduced by wires thousands of times thinner than a hair but capable of detecting a single virus. The specter of worldwide viral epidemics is always with us, so detecting them quickly offers the possibility of saving thousands of lives. The pathogens also can be stealthy biological weapons, making their positive detection a vital national defense requirement.

    “We want to find a single virus before it finds you,†says Charles Lieber, Hyman Professor of Chemistry at Harvard University. Tests recently completed in his laboratory show that these unimaginably thin nanowires can sense and distinguish between viruses that cause flu, measles, and eye infections. Lieber believes future versions will be able to spot HIV, Ebola, SARS, West Nile, hepatitis, bird flu, and other dangerous viruses.
    �

    Replies: @Ron Unz
  • Tusk says:
    @Ron Unz
    @Ron Unz

    Actually, someone pointed out that the Coronavirus outbreak occurred at the absolute peak of the Chinese holiday travel season, the ideal time for having it spread very rapidly before being detected.

    Obviously, any natural or accidental outbreak would generally tend to occur at some random time of year, so this somewhat increases the likelihood that it was a biowarfare attack against China.

    It's also intriguing that Charles Lieber, a very high-ranking Harvard professor with strong China ties, was suddenly arrested and dragged off in shackles for what amounts to some sort of technical issue of misreporting his Chinese funding from many years ago.

    Frankly, I've *never* heard of anything like that happening before to a mainstream academic, especially for some technical-reporting violation. I wonder whether it isn't just meant to intimidate all American academics who might consider voicing their suspicions about the Coronavirus outbreak. Maybe the NSA even discovered that Lieber was expressing some personal doubts about the official Coronavirus story in his emails or phone calls.

    After all, if a likely future Harvard Nobel Laureate can be dragged off in chains and face many years in prison for a supposed financial-reporting-violation, I'd think that lots of ordinary professors would think twice before questioning the Coronavirus story with MSM journalists...

    Replies: @Wizard of Oz, @Tusk

    I would imagine an outbreak would have the highest chance to naturally occur during peak travel periods, to me this doesn’t really provide any information in regards to it being a bioweapon. With increased interactions between many people overlapping via travel a virus can spread through many potential hosts at once.
    i.e. https://pneumonia.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s41479-017-0026-1

    Considering that isolation and a quarantine are used to stop the spread of a virus, it is clearly unlikely that a pandemic would happen during a quiet and isolated part of the year.

    I certainly agree that if one were releasing a bioweapon this would be ideal to get maximum coverage but I simply can’t agree that it really increases the likelyhood that it was, since a naturally occuring virus would have increased chances in the same environment.

    It also seems odd if this was just a “test” as some people allege. China would now have direct experience in organising and managing an outbreak, they can also plan for redundencies for supply lines and transport routes if hubs are taken out. Why would you deploy it as a test when it makes the real thing less effective? If they wanted to test the spread of a racial-virus surely America could deploy it in a majority Chinese area in America (as they have done in previous cases) and easily test effectiveness and allow for a clean cover up.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Alfred
    @Tusk

    Why would you deploy it as a test when it makes the real thing less effective?

    The politics demanded a "solution" now - not in 2 years.

    Economic and financial sanctions are a form of war. By tweaking the exchange rate of the Turkish Lira, for example, great pressure can be exerted on Erdogan to do what they want him to do. That is why Russia moved its reserves out of the USD and much of it into Gold. The Chinese cannot do that as their reserves are much greater and it would bring down the world economy - on which they depend. The Russians can keep their economy going even if there is no external trade.

    The USA is essentially in a war against countries like Syria, Iran, Yemen, Venezuela, Russia and China. In a war, you cannot wait for the perfect tank or missile to be developed. You use what is currently available even if it is somewhat deficient. As anyone can see, this virus is doing ample damage to the Chinese economy and to the confidence of the Chinese people in their government. What more can they wish for?
  • @Glaivester
    @nsa

    As I recall, it was called the Spanish flu because all of the cases reported in the media occurred in Spain - because neutral Spain was one of the few countries not censoring its news.

    Replies: @KA

    No it started in Kansas . That’s proven and known to historian and academic .

  • denk says:

    That notorious Cock’s report….
    The chicoms are stealing all our secrets !!!
    https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1999-jul-21-me-58074-story.html

    Even today , murkkan sheeples gleefully lap up every fukus agitprop, …
    The chicoms are stealing all our secrets,
    they’r hacking into the Pentagon, the MIC, etc etc..
    our bank accounts, our health records…

    OMFG,
    There’s no place we can hide from the chicoms…

    P,S,
    And they keep telling us,
    We whiteys have the highest IQ,
    OMFG !

  • @d dan
    @utu

    New "clinical diagnosis" method was introduced in Hubei based on feedback from the frontline doctors and healthcare workers. The faster test sways the treatments to the conservative side that may include other possible causes of pneumonia because the determination of the exact cause(s) is time consuming, complicated, and may not even be necessary for most treatments. This enables more patients to be treated as confirmed cases as soon as possible compare with previous test method, and hence reduces the chances of false negatives. It also enables more tracking of potential secondary contacts.

    Out of 14,840 new cases, 13,332 cases are based on the new method i.e. 1508 are confirmed cases based on the old method. Out of 242 new deaths, 135 are based on the new method and 107 are based on the old method. Both old numbers are consistent with the trend of the previous days in Hubei, although going forward, they may not be reported any more.

    Just want to get this info out lest trolls start spreading rumors again (e.g. "They only just swept up and counted the the dead folks lying about in the streets").

    Replies: @eah, @d dan

    Latest numbers (Feb 14):

    New case: 4047
    New suspected case: 2807
    New death: 121

    So, it looks like yesterday numbers (new case: 14,840; new death: 242) are one-time adjustment. These newest numbers are still slightly elevated compare with the numbers before the introduction of new “clinical diagnosis†method. But it certainly will be better to be aggressive at this stage of the battle.

  • @Ron Unz
    @Ron Unz

    Actually, someone pointed out that the Coronavirus outbreak occurred at the absolute peak of the Chinese holiday travel season, the ideal time for having it spread very rapidly before being detected.

    Obviously, any natural or accidental outbreak would generally tend to occur at some random time of year, so this somewhat increases the likelihood that it was a biowarfare attack against China.

    It's also intriguing that Charles Lieber, a very high-ranking Harvard professor with strong China ties, was suddenly arrested and dragged off in shackles for what amounts to some sort of technical issue of misreporting his Chinese funding from many years ago.

    Frankly, I've *never* heard of anything like that happening before to a mainstream academic, especially for some technical-reporting violation. I wonder whether it isn't just meant to intimidate all American academics who might consider voicing their suspicions about the Coronavirus outbreak. Maybe the NSA even discovered that Lieber was expressing some personal doubts about the official Coronavirus story in his emails or phone calls.

    After all, if a likely future Harvard Nobel Laureate can be dragged off in chains and face many years in prison for a supposed financial-reporting-violation, I'd think that lots of ordinary professors would think twice before questioning the Coronavirus story with MSM journalists...

    Replies: @Wizard of Oz, @Tusk

    “Shackled”!! I was so surprised I had to check, but, yes, it’s the good ol’ USA and Harvard Professors have no right to expect less humiliation than everyday muggers. In so far as it’s a case of financial crime maybe someone was looking to catch up on Harvard after seeing Larry Summers get away scot free.

    A warning shot? Fortunately I see the response of at least a few thousand of America’s “ordinary professors” who read the arrest as a warning as quite likely to cook up provocations which would make the FBI or whatever look pretty silly.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Ron Unz
    @Wizard of Oz


    “Shackledâ€!! I was so surprised I had to check, but, yes, it’s the good ol’ USA and Harvard Professors have no right to expect less humiliation than everyday muggers.
    �
    That raises an interesting point...

    America has been around for nearly 250 years, and I'm wondering whether this is the first time in our entire national history that a mainstream academic has been dragged off in chains...

    And by the most astonishing coincidence, it happens to a top Harvard professor with huge expertise in viruses and personal links to China at exactly the same time that an enormously deadly and somewhat mysterious viral outbreak occurs in China...

    Hmmm...

    Replies: @Ron Unz, @Wizard of Oz, @Anonymous
  • d dan says:
    @Wizard of Oz
    @Ron Unz

    So far my linking this article to old friends with many years experience of doing business in China (and living there) has elicited this, inter alia,

    "The notion that democracy somehow leads to better health outcomes is not supported by any factual evidence.  It is instructive to review how India responded to the 1994 outbreak of the plague in the city of Surat.  Hundreds of thousands promptly fled the city in fear the imposition of a quarantine, moreover, and I quote from the Indian Journal of Medical Ethics:


    "On the very first night of the outbreak of plague, around a hundred families of doctors and other professionals from the Ved road and Katargam area alone left the city in their vehicles. The procession of doctors fleeing from the city continued the next day and the day after. According to the survey of general practitioners in the plague affected areas, as many as 76% of the doctors were reported as having absconded from the city".  


    Lucky that similar contagious diseases have not, so far, originated in India!"

    Another, who has been based in Beijing for 10 years mostly working with/running medical tech companies just said

    "Well done and here here. 100% agree with this piece by KJN. Cheers, B"

    The former correspondent BTW described the following - whose URL I may have accidentally truncated - as "bizarre" with which it is hard to disagree.

    “Americans May be Spared the Worst of Corona Virus†by Op-ed Daily https://link.medium.com/PHspz5

    Replies: @Commentator Mike, @d dan

    Thanks Wizard of Oz.

    China sacrifices a province, with its concomitant lose of GDP of easily 100’s billions (bigger than the GDP of many countries in the world). Thousands of people are braving in the front lines selflessly, while around the clock everyday, I hear touching stories about ordinary and nameless Chinese’s gallant battles.

    And what are all these for? They not only save China, they also save the world. Imagine if China let the disease spread like the way US managed H1N1. How many thousands will die? Imagine if it goes to India, Africa and other developing countries, how many millions will be infected? How much damage to the economies will it cause? How much misery is enough for people?

    China does not expect a “thank you” note from everyone, but is it too much to expect decent people to hold their words of despise for a moment?

    •ï¿½Replies: @thetruth
    @d dan

    thank you, well said.

    Bloomberg has an article "China Sacrifices a Province to Save the World From Coronavirus"
    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-02-05/china-sacrifices-a-province-to-save-the-world-from-coronavirus
    , @Adûnâi
    @d dan

    "Imagine if it goes to India, Africa and other developing countries, how many millions will be infected?"

    Why would that be a cause for grief? The fewer subhumans, the better. Personally, I am delighted that the DPRK's quarantine seems to be working.

    There is no humanity, there is nation. And nation is more than a sum of individuals.
  • [[[they]]] might be doing their damndest to make a Lee Wen Ho outta poor Lieber…..

    WEN HO LEE / You Call This Justice? /
    Presumed guilty until proven innocent

    https://www.sfgate.com/opinion/article/WEN-HO-LEE-You-Call-This-Justice-Presumed-2883532.php

  • denk says:

    How the [[[sobs]]] gagged the whistle blowers of biowarfare in the Korean war…..

    During and after the Korean War, China produced considerable evidence that the US military was employing biological pathogens against both the Chinese and the North Koreans. More than 25 US POWs supported Chinese claims – and provided further, and very detailed, corroborating evidence of anthrax, various insects such as mosquitoes and fleas carrying Yellow Fever, and even propaganda leaflets infected with cholera, over the entire North-East of China and virtually all of North Korea. The US government immediately filed charges of sedition against the soldiers who told their stories of these illegal activities, applying enormous pressure to silence them, even threatening defending lawyers with unspecified retribution. As a final desperate attempt to silence these former POWs, the US military relied on the CIA to subject them to extensive treatments with a newly-discovered and dangerous drug called Metrazol, in attempts to totally erase all memories of their activities in Korea, apparently destroying the mens’ minds in the process.

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-geopolitical-deployment-of-biological-weapons/5703005

  • denk says:

    After all, if a likely future Harvard Nobel Laureate can be dragged off in chains and face many years in prison for a supposed financial-reporting-violation, I’d think that lots of ordinary professors would think twice before questioning the Coronavirus story with MSM journalists…

    Also, they’ll think twice before joining China’s
    one thousand talents program, an initiative to attract top talents all over the world to accelerate the progress of Made In China 2025 proj, for which Lieber is a member.

    [[[sobs]]] might even put LIeber thru the wringer,
    solitary confinement, deprivement of sleep, threat of more serious trumped up charges, to force a confession that slander China.

    Remember the case of Lee Wen HO ?

  • @Wizard of Oz
    @Ron Unz

    So far my linking this article to old friends with many years experience of doing business in China (and living there) has elicited this, inter alia,

    "The notion that democracy somehow leads to better health outcomes is not supported by any factual evidence.  It is instructive to review how India responded to the 1994 outbreak of the plague in the city of Surat.  Hundreds of thousands promptly fled the city in fear the imposition of a quarantine, moreover, and I quote from the Indian Journal of Medical Ethics:


    "On the very first night of the outbreak of plague, around a hundred families of doctors and other professionals from the Ved road and Katargam area alone left the city in their vehicles. The procession of doctors fleeing from the city continued the next day and the day after. According to the survey of general practitioners in the plague affected areas, as many as 76% of the doctors were reported as having absconded from the city".  


    Lucky that similar contagious diseases have not, so far, originated in India!"

    Another, who has been based in Beijing for 10 years mostly working with/running medical tech companies just said

    "Well done and here here. 100% agree with this piece by KJN. Cheers, B"

    The former correspondent BTW described the following - whose URL I may have accidentally truncated - as "bizarre" with which it is hard to disagree.

    “Americans May be Spared the Worst of Corona Virus†by Op-ed Daily https://link.medium.com/PHspz5

    Replies: @Commentator Mike, @d dan

    Wizard,

    I always thought those Indian “doctors” couldn’t be trusted to do their jobs properly. From those statistics it would appear that at least a quarter of them may be worth something.

  • @Ron Unz
    @Anonymous


    What I think utu and some of the other commenters are suggesting is that there seem to be 2 theories that predominate, either that it was natural or a Chinese bioweapon, and that the idea that it’s a US bioweapon is just as plausible as the Chinese bioweapon theory.
    �
    Well, I've seen zero evidence that the Coronavirus is a bioweapon, but if it were, it would almost certainly be an American one. I'd put the odds that America built and released it as 10x or 20x more likely than China. The Internet is filled with enormous numbers of crackpots and shills, and anyone who claims it's probably a Chinese bioweapon has revealed himself as such.

    For example, there are some early indications that the virus is far more deadly to Chinese (and probably other East Asians) than whites. I'd say an American bioweapon would be much more likely to target Chinese people than a Chinese bioweapon.

    Second, China was the place hit, and it occurred during a time of high US-China international tension. A totally-coincidental bioweapon release by China is far less likely under these circumstances than a deliberate one by America.

    Over the last year, something like half of all China's domestic pigs, the main meat source of the Chinese people, have died due to a sudden outbreak of a different Swine virus. The close timing with the sudden outbreak of the human virus does seem rather suspicious.

    Just a few days ago, Whitney Webb published a fine article on America's long history of bioweapons research:

    https://www.unz.com/wwebb/bats-gene-editing-and-bioweapons-recent-darpa-experiments-raise-concerns-amid-coronavirus-outbreak/

    I'd say that use of a bioweapon under current world circumstances would be a totally insane policy, and normally I'd say that would almost rule out the possibility. However, America's government has already demonstrated that it's totally insane in lots of other things, so maybe the pattern fits...

    Replies: @utu, @ivan, @Wizard of Oz, @Ron Unz, @steinbergfeldwitzcohen

    Actually, someone pointed out that the Coronavirus outbreak occurred at the absolute peak of the Chinese holiday travel season, the ideal time for having it spread very rapidly before being detected.

    Obviously, any natural or accidental outbreak would generally tend to occur at some random time of year, so this somewhat increases the likelihood that it was a biowarfare attack against China.

    It’s also intriguing that Charles Lieber, a very high-ranking Harvard professor with strong China ties, was suddenly arrested and dragged off in shackles for what amounts to some sort of technical issue of misreporting his Chinese funding from many years ago.

    Frankly, I’ve *never* heard of anything like that happening before to a mainstream academic, especially for some technical-reporting violation. I wonder whether it isn’t just meant to intimidate all American academics who might consider voicing their suspicions about the Coronavirus outbreak. Maybe the NSA even discovered that Lieber was expressing some personal doubts about the official Coronavirus story in his emails or phone calls.

    After all, if a likely future Harvard Nobel Laureate can be dragged off in chains and face many years in prison for a supposed financial-reporting-violation, I’d think that lots of ordinary professors would think twice before questioning the Coronavirus story with MSM journalists…

    •ï¿½Agree: Alfred
    •ï¿½Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    @Ron Unz

    "Shackled"!! I was so surprised I had to check, but, yes, it's the good ol' USA and Harvard Professors have no right to expect less humiliation than everyday muggers. In so far as it's a case of financial crime maybe someone was looking to catch up on Harvard after seeing Larry Summers get away scot free.

    A warning shot? Fortunately I see the response of at least a few thousand of America's "ordinary professors" who read the arrest as a warning as quite likely to cook up provocations which would make the FBI or whatever look pretty silly.

    Replies: @Ron Unz
    , @Tusk
    @Ron Unz

    I would imagine an outbreak would have the highest chance to naturally occur during peak travel periods, to me this doesn't really provide any information in regards to it being a bioweapon. With increased interactions between many people overlapping via travel a virus can spread through many potential hosts at once.
    i.e. https://pneumonia.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s41479-017-0026-1

    Considering that isolation and a quarantine are used to stop the spread of a virus, it is clearly unlikely that a pandemic would happen during a quiet and isolated part of the year.

    I certainly agree that if one were releasing a bioweapon this would be ideal to get maximum coverage but I simply can't agree that it really increases the likelyhood that it was, since a naturally occuring virus would have increased chances in the same environment.

    It also seems odd if this was just a "test" as some people allege. China would now have direct experience in organising and managing an outbreak, they can also plan for redundencies for supply lines and transport routes if hubs are taken out. Why would you deploy it as a test when it makes the real thing less effective? If they wanted to test the spread of a racial-virus surely America could deploy it in a majority Chinese area in America (as they have done in previous cases) and easily test effectiveness and allow for a clean cover up.

    Replies: @Alfred
  • And now……
    Suddendly we heard about a locust disaster in Africa that has already spread to ……India !

    China watch out !

    After attacking the livestock, [[[sobs]]] might go for the food crops !!