The article says:
Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani visited Washington to sign economic agreements and advocate for a stronger Iraq-U.S. partnership…
Washington controls the disbursement of Iraq’s dollar-denominated oil revenues from an account at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
An aggressive Trump administration may view Iraq as part of Iran’s sphere of influence, and Iran will try to cut its losses in Syria and Lebanon by strengthening its hand in Iraq.
That said, Baghdad knows it and Tehran are “neighbors forever,†so it must press for relations based on mutual respect and benefit.
Why does Iraq have any connection to Washington, besides embassies and the most basic diplomatic relationship? Has Iraq learned nothing after two American invasions and what just happened in Syria?
Unless Prime Minister al-Sudani is some kind of Western dupe or crypto-Jew, then he should be moving his country as far away from Washington as possible. He should also be getting Iraqi funds out of American banks and stop using the dollar.
Some kind of alliance with Iran, Russia, and China–the BRICS nations in general–will offer the Iraqi people the best options for the future. As the article states, they should begin by establishing with Iran a relationship based on mutual respect and benefit.
Because, if Iran falls, then there goes the neighborhood, and the Jews will be at Iraq’s doorstep in no time.
Trump declared “…they can’t have a nuclear weapon.â€
Why not? It’s the only protection against USrael.
“sanctions (and the occasional Israeli attack) may be [Trump’s] only options.”
So why does the Tribe constantly kvetch about the “occasional attacks” fomented against it over millennia?
Finally, what did WWII Germany do that Matzonia hasn’t for the past 76 years?
Bibi channels Adolf.
Can’t understand why Ron Unz ran this piece. It’s been completely overtaken by the collapse of Syria.
feel free to suggest your own scenarios
The US government needs to start serving the American people, instead of serving Israel.
America’s enemy is Al-Qaeda and its offshoots. They attacked the American homeland on 9/11.
Those who have never attacked the American homeland, including Russia, Iran, Hezbollah, the Houthis, the Iraqi PMF, and the Palestinian resistance, are not America’s enemies. Quite the contrary – they are potential allies against Al-Qaeda.
As part of an urgent strategy to prevent the spread of Al-Qaeda from Syria to Lebanon, Iraq or Yemen, we should immediately cease all hostilities against the Axis of Resistance:
We should end all US military activity directed against the Axis of Resistance.
We should end all economic sanctions against nations which have a history of fighting against Al-Qaeda, including Russia and Iran.
We should end all military foreign aid to nations which have a history of assisting Al-Qaeda, including Israel and Ukraine.
Militant groups which have a history of fighting against Al-Qaeda, including Hezbollah, the Houthis, and the Palestinian resistance, should be removed from the list of terrorist organizations.
(But obviously Al-Qaeda and its offshoots, including HTS, AQAP, ISIS and ISIS-K, must be kept on the list of terrorist organizations!)
Furthermore, an Iranian nuclear arsenal is not a particularly troubling prospect, given Iran’s history of moderation and restraint. The existing nuclear arsenals of Pakistan and Israel are far more worrisome, given Pakistan’s history of harboring Al-Qaeda leaders and Israel’s “Samson Option”. If nuclear non-proliferation is a priority, we should start by pressuring Israel and Pakistan to surrender their existing nuclear arsenals, rather than worrying about a potential future Iranian nuclear arsenal.
America took over from Britain. Britain took over from Ottoman. New order in MEwill be incoroprated under the Zionist. Ottoman stayed for long .Britain lost in less than 50 years. America manged to hold it not any longer than Britain did . Both Britain and America faced violent resistance in one form or another .Zionism . will face same . To dilute the ethnocentirc resistance,Zionist will invite swarthy Indians,black Nigerians,Ethiopians,South Sudanese and Eritrean .
Europe will not be able to do much except drowning itself in anti -islamic polemic,conceding to Chinese power, and staying into constant flux of rivarly around history,language,resiurces,and alliances to foreign powers . American jews will migrate because of the realization of the Christians what Ziinist have wrought on them. Chances are the end time Protestants will survive on the fringes totally dependent on lootings by the Ziinists. American demography for years to come will continue to hate Jews .This fissures will lead to creations of puppets by Jews and fragmentation of America. Russia will continue to shrink in power and demography.Its alliances with Jews will suffer but the Jews will impose same system on it that Jews have on US.
In this equilibrium, corruption in Israel will sink deeeper.Religious fights will grow more ferocious and make it vulnerable to foreign meddlings and will lead to many compromises.Israel will be managed by foreign ethnic lobbies as Ottoman in the past was and America in the current are.
It will suffer same fate but much worst unless Jews can purge the history of its behaviors stretching back to 1948. It has already erased the history predating 1948.
But 2025 is not 2018. Although Iran was on the ropes then, things are different now.
Yes. Iran would love to have some rope back. Things are much worse for the mullahs now:
• Iranian Hamas, crushed
• Iranian Hezbollah, leadership dead or injured, groveling for a ceasefire
• Syria, cowardly Iranians fled
• Palestinian Jews flew F-35’s freely in Iranian airspace
Israel is objectively stronger today than in 2018.
America’s support for Israel’s campaigns against the Palestinian and Lebanese people has eroded local support for U.S. moves, as many Middle East capitals are doubtful about “maximum pressure†and feel it will increase regional tensions.
LOL…. No….
Veggie-In-Chief Biden is pathetic. Everyone is stringing him along until Inauguration Day. Trump’s 2nd term is already laying the ground needed for containment of Iranian aggression.
There is a deadline for negotiations with Iran: Oct. 18, 2025, sees the end of the sanctions snapback mechanism, “the last opportunity for world powers to return to all the sanctions that were lifted in the [Iran nuclear] agreement.â€
Everyone on every side accepts that Iran abrogated JCPOA while Obama was still in office (1). It is not coming back. Sociopath Khamenei is not negotiation capable. The end of the Iranian theocracy is coming:
-A- Will it become a Monarchy? The enoblement of the current Ayatollah’s son to become Monarch suggests this as a potential outcome.
-B- The other primary option is the “Egypt plan”. Thanks to State Owned Enterprises, the no longer particularly revolutionary Guards Corps are steeped capitalism. And, containment is bad for business.
If you do not like A or B, feel free to suggest your own scenarios for displacement of the pathetic and unloved theocracy. There are other ways for the mullahs to be disempowered.
PEACE 😇
__________
(1) https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/14910/iran-nuclear-deal-violations
Trumpstein doesn’t intend to “sanction” Iran:
he and his Zionist owners, in concert with Izrahell,
intend to utterly destroy Iran. For which destruction
the IDF air force ongoing liquidation of the former Assad regime’s military assets in Syria is a mere warm-up exercise.
Forgetting the nonsense of the elections. It is quite credible that Trump was again appointed for his hatred of Iran to use it to bomb with nuclear weapons that country that does not have them. He is the ideal candidate for lacking any scruples and would do it as if it were part of a TV show in front of the cameras.
And as much as one observes, that seems to be what is coming now and equally Trump seems the ideal candidate for a new nuclear crime.
In the critical situation that the country is in, it needs a politician like FDR, who did not have a criminal mentality and would not have used nuclear weapons against two defenseless civilian populations if he had lived.
The USA hasn’t lived up to a treaty since the day it came into existence. They aren’t going to start now. They IAEA has been a joke for some time, jumping on Iran for developing its nuclear non-weapons programmes, while ignoring that the US is in violation of the NPT, because it can’t locate all of its nukes. The US led by Zion Don will follow what Israel instructs it to do – attack Iran.
The Squad acted very much the same in the US. The student protesters were unfairly
crushed by NYPD, Biden and the Republicans(Trump). There is no opposition even in much of
the non West despite what some Alt -media outlets drool about
Layla Ali the Liberal MP from West Oxford is a nice looking assimilated Palestinian who spend much of her career pretending it wasn’t the Jews. She always tut tutted at far right folks who knew about the Jewish character. She was even used to take down Nick Griffin of BNP fame on Question time. I can’t imagine that she really cares about her brethren in Gaza. She’s take the shekels, much like the posturing leaders in Turkey. Even Palestinians are comprised. Why wouldn’t a Sheik?
SOURCE: https://www.thoughtco.com/timeline-of-the-lebanese-civil-war-2353188Replies: @Anon, @anon
Timeline of the Lebanese Civil War from 1975 to 1990:
By Pierre Tristam
Pierre Tristam is an award-winning writer who covers Middle East, foreign affairs, immigration, and civil liberties.
Updated on August 12, 2019
The Lebanese Civil War took place from 1975 to 1990 and claimed the lives of some 200,000 people, which left Lebanon in ruins.
1975—1978: Attempted Assassination to Peace Accords
The early years of the conflict began with the attempted assassination of the Phalangist leader Pierre Gemayel and ended with the first Arab-Israeli peace accord brokered by former President Jimmy Carter.
April 13, 1975
Gunmen attempt to assassinate Maronite Christian Phalangist leader Pierre Gemayel as he's leaving church that Sunday. In retaliation, Phalangist gunmen ambush a busload of Palestinians, most of them civilians, killing 27 passengers. Week-long clashes between Palestinian-Muslim forces and Phalangists follow, marking the beginning of Lebanon's 15-year civil war.
June 1976
Some 30,000 Syrian troops enter Lebanon, ostensibly to restore peace. Syria's intervention stops vast military gains against Christians by Palestinian-Muslim forces. The invasion is, in fact, Syria's attempt to claim Lebanon, which it never recognized when Lebanon won independence from France in 1943.
October 1976
Egyptian, Saudi, and other Arab troops in small numbers join the Syrian force as a result of a peace summit brokered in Cairo. The so-called Arab Deterrent Force would be short-lived.
March 11, 1978
Palestinian commandos attack an Israeli kibbutz between Haifa and Tel Aviv, then hijack a bus. Israeli forces respond. By the time the battle was over, 37 Israelis and nine Palestinians were killed.
March 14, 1978
Some 25,000 Israeli soldiers crossed the Lebanese border in Operation Litani, named for the Litani River that crosses South Lebanon, not 20 miles from the Israeli border. The invasion is designed to wipe out the Palestine Liberation Organization's structure in South Lebanon. The operation fails.
March 19, 1978
The United Nations Security Council adopts Resolution 425, sponsored by the United States, calling on Israel to withdraw from South Lebanon and on the UN to establish a 4,000-strong UN peacekeeping force in South Lebanon. The force is termed the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon. Its original mandate was for six months. The force is still in Lebanon today.
June 13, 1978
Israel withdraws, mostly, from occupied territory, handing over authority to the breakaway Lebanese Army force of Maj. Saad Haddad, which expands its operations in South Lebanon, operating as an Israeli ally.
July 1, 1978
Syria turns its guns on Lebanon's Christians, pounding Christian areas of Lebanon in the worst fighting in two years.
September 1978
U.S. President Jimmy Carter brokers the Camp David accords between Israel and Egypt, the first Arab-Israeli peace. Palestinians in Lebanon vow to escalate their attacks on Israel.
1982—1985: Israeli Invasion to Hijacking
The middle years of the conflict began with Israel's invasion of Lebanon and ended with the hijacking of a TWA flight to Beirut by Hezbollah militants. The period also included the killing of 241 U.S. Marines in their Beirut barracks by a suicide bomber.
​June 6, 1982
Israel invades Lebanon again. Gen. Ariel Sharon leads the attack. The two-month drive leads the Israeli army to the southern suburbs of Beirut. The Red Cross estimates the invasion costs the lives of some 18,000 people, mostly civilian Lebanese.
August 24, 1982
A multinational force of U.S. Marines, French paratroopers, and Italian soldiers lands in Beirut to assist in the evacuation of the Palestine Liberation Organization.
August 30, 1982
After intense mediation led by the United States, Yasser Arafat and the Palestine Liberation Organization, which had run a state-within-a-state in West Beirut and South Lebanon, evacuate Lebanon. Some 6,000 PLO fighters go mostly to Tunisia, where they are again dispersed. Most end up in the West Bank and Gaza.
September 10, 1982
The Multinational force completes its withdrawal from Beirut.
Sept. 14, 1982
The Israeli-backed Christian Phalangist leader and Lebanese President-Elect Bashir Gemayel is assassinated at his headquarters in East Beirut.
Sept. 15, 1982
Israeli troops invade West Beirut, the first time an Israeli force enters an Arab capital.
Sept. 15-16, 1982
Under the supervision of Israeli forces, Christian militiamen are bused into the two Palestinian refugee camps of Sabra and Shatila, ostensibly to“mop up†remaining Palestinian fighters. Between 2,000 and 3,000 Palestinian civilians are massacred.
September 23, 1982
Amin Gemayel, brother of Bashir, takes office as Lebanon's president.
September 24, 1982
The U.S.-French-Italian Multinational Force returns to Lebanon in a show of force and support for the Gemayel's government. At first, French and American soldiers play a neutral role. Gradually, they turn into defenders of the Gemayel regime against Druze and Shiites in central and South Lebanon.
April 18, 1983
The American Embassy in Beirut is attacked by a suicide bomb, killing 63. By then, the United States is actively engaged in Lebanon's civil war on the side of the Gemayel government.
May 17, 1983
Lebanon and Israel sign a U.S.-brokered peace agreement that calls for the withdrawal of Israeli troops contingent on the withdrawal of Syrian troops from northern and eastern Lebanon. Syria opposes the agreement, which was never ratified by the Lebanese parliament and canceled in 1987.
October 23, 1983
U.S. Marines barracks near Beirut International Airport, on the south side of the city, are attacked by a suicide bomber in a truck, killing 241 Marines. Moments later, French paratroopers' barracks are attacked by a suicide bomber, killing 58 French soldiers.
Feb. 6, 1984
Predominantly Shiite Muslim militias seize control of West Beirut.
June 10, 1985
The Israeli army finishes withdrawing out of most of Lebanon, but keeps an occupation zone along the Lebanon-Israeli border and calls it its“security zone.†The zone is patrolled by the South Lebanon Army and Israeli soldiers.
June 16, 1985
Hezbollah militants hijack a TWA flight to Beirut, demanding the release of Shiite prisoners in Israeli jails. Militants murder U.S. Navy diver Robert Stethem. The passengers were not freed until two weeks later. Israel, over a period of weeks following the resolution of the hijacking, released some 700 prisoners, insisting the release was not related to the hijacking.
1987—1990: Assassination to Conflict's End
The final years of the conflict started with the assassination of the Lebanon's prime minister and ended with the official end of the civil war in 1990.
June 1, 1987
Lebanese Prime Minister Rashid Karami, a Sunni Muslim, is assassinated when a bomb explodes in his helicopter. He is replaced by Selim el Hoss.
September 22, 1988
The presidency of Amin Gemayel ends without a successor. Lebanon operates under two rival governments: a military government led by renegade general Michel Aoun, and a civil government headed by Selim el Hoss, a Sunni Muslim.
March 14, 1989
Gen. Michel Aoun declares a “war of Liberationâ€against Syrian occupation. The war triggers a devastating final round to the Lebanese Civil War as Christian factions battle it out.
September 22, 1989
The Arab League brokers a cease-fire. Lebanese and Arab leaders meet in Taif, Saudi Arabia, under the leadership of Lebanese Sunni leader Rafik Hariri. The Taif agreement effectively lays the groundwork for an end to the war by reapportioning power in Lebanon. Christians lose their majority in Parliament, settling for a 50-50 split, though the president is to remain a Maronite Christian, the prime minister a Sunni Muslim, and the speaker of Parliament a Shiite Muslim.
November 22, 1989
President-Elect René Muawad, believed to have been a reunification candidate, is assassinated. He is replaced by Elias Harawi. Gen. Emile Lahoud is named to replace Gen. Michel Aoun as commander of the Lebanese army.
October 13, 1990
Syrian forces are given a green light by France and the United States to storm Michel Aoun's presidential palace once Syria joins the American coalition against Saddam Hussein in Operation Desert Shield and Desert Storm.
October 13, 1990
Michel Aoun takes refuge in the French Embassy, then chooses exile in Paris (he was to return as a Hezbollah ally in 2005). October 13, 1990, marks the official end of the Lebanese Civil War. Between 150,000 and 200,000 people, most of them civilians, are believed to have perished in the war.
�
In 1979, [Rafael] Eitan and [Meir] Dagan [both brass in the Israel Defense Forces] created the Front for the Liberation of Lebanon from Foreigners, and ran that fictitious group from 1979 to 1983. In 1981 and 1982, Ariel Sharon used that Front to conduct a series of indiscriminate car bombings that killed hundreds of civilians.
“The objective of this massive ‘terrorist’ car bombing campaign was to ‘sow chaos’ amongst the Palestinian & Lebanese civilian population†and, in 1981-82, to provoke the PLO into resorting to ‘terrorism,’ thus providing Israel with an excuse to invade Lebanon.
“The FLLF operation is described in great details in Bergman’s book. His account is based solely on first hand accounts from Israeli officials involved in the operation or who were aware of it at the time. It is also described in detail in my article here [in Mondoweiss in May: The remarkable disappearing act of Israel’s car-bombing campaign in Lebanon or: What we (do not) talk about when we talk about ‘terrorism’].
“As I show in this article, not a SINGLE review of Bergman’s book in the US media has mentioned the FLLF operation. Nor has it been mentioned in a SINGLE of the countless interviews he has given on the topic over the last few months. The US media has thus been fully silent about the fact that Israeli officials directed a major & fully indiscriminate car bombing campaign that killed 100s of civilians in Lebanon. This silence also means that the US media has failed to notice the possible implications of this revelation about the Dean case.
“Bergman himself does not mention the assassination attempt against Dean. But we know that the FLLF took credit for this attack at the time. That Dean’s own investigation pointed to Israel & to its Lebanese proxies. And we now know that the FLLF was CREATED and RUN by Israel.
“None of this is absolutely conclusive, of course. Nonetheless, this topic might warrant investigation from US journalists (who might also want to write about the FLLF car bombing campaign, ie about Israeli officials resorting to ‘terrorism.’â€
Brulin subsequently added this important comment:
Bergman does note on several occasions in his book that he is not allowed to write and talk about a lot of the operations that his sources talked to him about.
https://mondoweiss.net/2018/08/credence-ambassadors-assassinate/
This is a good essay yet the author leaves out the one glaring possibility
that to some great extent still presides—will the Palestinians be sacrificed by all
including the Gulf States despite the sincerity and numbers of the masses in their streets ?
This possibility still exists and the author does not seem to take that possibility
as at all plausible. I am less sanguine than he somewhat appears. He is correct with his through analysis other than that point. It is the pink elephant in the region–the status quo
Trump is not a contrarian not dissident. He is an enabler of the status quo and yes
he is primarily interested in his media legacy.
What is to stop ? Who is to stop ? what has already been happening. Saudi Arabia has not yet
officially joined BRICS. Hedging their bets along with the Turks. Will the strategic patience of
the Axis of Resistance enable the status quo to regroup? I would take that much more seriously than he is. Other that that–it is an excellent analysis of many actors
These brutal and gullible Arab head of ‘states’ would feel ‘secure’ if they served the interest of the evil empire and its mad dog, Israel. They have NO honor among the Arab population because they have brought them nothing but SHAME.
UAE is run by the zionist racists, HINDUS, who are spying for Israel. Number of racist Hindus were charged with SPYING for Israel in Qatar, given death sentences, later, due to zionist pressure, were reduced. Saudis, UAE, Jordan and Egypt have, like Turkey, served the interest of genocidal zionists in Gaza against Palestinians. That’s why these FAKE ‘ leaders’ have NO RESPECT among their own population and beyond. They are impotent.
We all remember the events, especially when Houthis launched multiple strikes on Saudi sites targeting a liquefied natural gas (LNG) plant, water desalination plant, oil facility and power station in 2022. The LNG plant at a petrochemicals complex in the Red Sea port city of Yanbu run by the Saudi Arabian Oil Co, better known as Aramco,where Trump did nothing to save Saudi Arabia and MBS from Houthis’ missiles attacks.
Later, the missile attack was repeated at UAE. Yet, these gullible Arab head of states cannot stop licking Jewish mafia members’ behinds. They got used to it.
The Arab people including the intellectuals are very angry at these fake ‘leaders’ because they know these zionists and corrupt Arab head of states have brought NOTHING but SHAME for the Arab population who are educated, and anti zionists and pro Palestinians. These countries have resources and educated people to be independent from zionism and imperialism, yet, the zionists and its American supporters do not allow ARABS and Muslims to be independent and sovereign. It is against the west interests. A charlatan and genocidal like Biden, Trump and Netanyahu, believe they should be kept WEAK and DEPENDENT so the West and its MAD DOG, the Jews can rob them and use them like a tissue then discard them. Arab population refuse to do that, only the traitor Arab head of states do that. They never learn from the history because they are desperately WEAK. The have deceived them all the time. For example, the West sold a painting valued at $1500, as the work of Leonardo da Vincito, to gullible MBS who paid $450 Million dollars for this fake painting. This was, in fact, the work of Salvator Mundi.
https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2022/11/15/five-years-since-the-450m-salvator-mundi-sale-a-first-hand-account-of-the-nonsensical-auction
The painting Salvator Mundi sold for $450.3 million at Christie’s in 2017 to a close ally of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS).
But why did Mohammed bin Salman want to buy this supposed masterwork of Christian religious art? What is he going to do with the most expensive artwork in the world? Where is it now? Will we ever see it again so we can see what we want to see? Surely someone knows if this was painted by Leonardo or not?
Trump, the ASSASSIN, through his illiterate Jewish son in-law, Kushner, manged to extort more than $2 Billions from MBS to ‘invest’ it the Trump’s whore house at the following:
Video Link
Does Israel not have nukes?
Palestine will be liberated, and fever dreams of “Greater Israel†put to bed, not by negotiation, but by force majeure.
�
Yes, but the Israeli Defense Forces are already fighting a one-and-a-half-front war. If the regional consensus will not consent to assault Israel in concert now, then when?When to assault a nuclear power is a frustrating question, admittedly. Perhaps the only real answer is, "Never." If so, that's a shame; but one remains skeptical that regional powers now standing by and watching fighting Gazans die will later avenge the fighting Gazans, after the fighting Gazans are no more.
There is now a consensus in the region, and indeed in the whole Global South, that the zionists need to be defeated and sent home.
�
Maybe so. We shall see.Replies: @1951
New military technologies are making it ever-easier for even non-state actors to raise the level of insecurity in Occupied Palestine to levels that zionists—especially educated, economically productive ones—cannot tolerate.
�
Iran has the atom bomb too. And the missiles to deliver them. Consider Iran has 300-400? ballistic missiles, which are unstoppable. The US sent two of our seven THAAD missile systems to Israel. Each system has 30? missiles. Israel and the US will run out of defensive missiles long before Iran runs out of offensive missiles. THAAD probably doesn’t even work. Looking at more conventional missiles, Iran has hundreds of thousands of missiles, Israel and the US will quickly run out of defensive missiles. Iran can then strike with impunity all of the military targets in Israel, as well as the US military bases concentrated along the Persian Gulf. This is in addition to throwing the world into an economic depression by closing passage through the Strait of Hormuz. Checkmate. Quantity has a quality all its own.
Iran has air defense systems that Hezbollah does not have. The only substantial military capability the US and Israel have is to establish air superiority, then drop bombs. We have built the wrong military. We needed, like Iran, to have a much greater focus on missiles, built in very large quantities. Instead we spend a fortune on aircraft carrier groups, which are readily sunk.
Trump is pretty much a loud mouth idiot. His stupidity could trigger a war that would be very damaging to both the US and Israel.
Palestine will be liberated, and fever dreams of “Greater Israel†put to bed, not by negotiation, but by force majeure.
Does Israel not have nukes?
“And it may not even take all that much force.”
Incorrect.
It will require mind-bending levels of violence to bring the US/Israeli warhawks to a halt.
The US and Israel are operating on a “might makes right” moral code, and the leadership in these countries sincerely believe they’re ushering in “the Kingdom of Heaven” with every JDAM they drop and every person they kill, whether young or old, man or woman, civilian or militiaman. They’re the 21st Century version of the Crusaders of old, the high tech Knights Templar Order for “a New Age.”
Nothing is going to stop them until their material and human losses are so severe that their own citizens rebel against them and refuse to participate in the their Apocalyptic madness.
They know Trump is hot air. The first four years showed that.
It’s a useful distraction for them. Putin seems to be using it too — as if Trump hadn’t been one big letdown for Russian peace and friendship last time.
It’s normal to speak optimistically as winter begins. But this will be a long cold one and we all know it. Enjoy a spot of hope. It won’t last.
YOU:
Israel was responsible for the Lebanese CIVIL WAR, and no one else. Israel wants to steal more land from Lebanon and will bomb Lebanon again until she fulfills her goal if they are not destroyed.
ME:
Not true at all. The IDF bombed and later invaded Lebanon in 1982 to fight the PLO which relocated to Southern Lebanon after being expelled from Jordan where the Palestinians tried to assassinate the King Hussein three times. The IDF completely withdrew its forces in 2000 after the expulsion of the PLO from Lebanon.
Here’s a brief history of the PLO in Jordan:
Black September: The Jordanian-PLO Civil War of 1970
King Hussein crushes the PLO and expels it from Jordan
By Pierre Tristam
Pierre Tristam is an award-winning writer who covers Middle East, foreign affairs, immigration, and civil liberties.
Updated on July 03, 2019
The Jordanian civil war of September 1970, also known in the Arab world as Black September, was an attempt by the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and the more radical Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) to topple Jordanian King Hussein and seize control of the country.
The PFLP sparked the war when it hijacked four jetliners, diverted three of them to a Jordanian airstrip and blew them up, and for three weeks held on to dozens of the 421 hostages it seized as human bargaining chips.
Why Palestinians Turned on Jordan
In 1970, some two-thirds of the Jordanian population was Palestinian. After the Arabs’ defeat in the 1967 Arab-Israeli War, or Six Day War, Palestinian militants took part in the War of Attrition against Israel. The war was mostly fought in Sinai between Egyptian and Israeli forces. But the PLO launched raids from Egypt, Jordan, and Lebanon as well.
The Jordanian king had not been keen to fight the 1967 war, nor was he eager to keep letting Palestinians attack Israel from his territory, or from the West Bank, which had been under Jordanian control until Israel occupied it in 1967. King Hussein had maintained secret, cordial relations with Israel through the 1950s and 1960s. But he had to balance his interests in preserving a peace with Israel against a restless and increasingly radicalized Palestinian population, which was threatening his throne.
Jordanian army and Palestinian militias led by the PLO fought several bloody battles in the summer of 1970, most violently during the week of June 9-16, when 1,000 people were killed or wounded. On July 10, King Hussein signed an agreement with the PLO’s Yasser Arafat pledging support to the Palestinian cause and noninterference in Palestinian commando raids on Israel in exchange for a Palestinian pledge to support Jordanian sovereignty and remove most Palestinian militias from Amman, the Jordanian capital. The agreement proved hollow.
Promise of Hell
When Egypt’s Gamal Abdel Nasser agreed to a cease-fire in the war of attrition and King Hussein supported the move, PFLP leader George Habash promised that “we will turn the Middle East into a hell,” while Arafat invoked the battle of Marathon in 490 B.C. and vowed, before a cheering crowd of 25,000 in Amman on July 31, 1970, that “We will liberate our land.”
Three times between June 9 and Sept. 1, Hussein escaped assassination attempts, the third time as would-be assassins opened fire on his motorcade while he drove to the airport in Amman to meet his daughter Alia, who was returning from Cairo.
The War
Between Sept. 6 and Sept. 9, Habash’s militants hijacked five planes, blew up one and diverted three others to a desert strip in Jordan called Dawson Field, where they blew up the planes on Sept. 12. Rather than receiving the support of King Hussein, the Palestinian hijackers were surrounded by units of the Jordanian military. Even though Arafat worked for the release of the hostages, he also turned his PLO militants loose on the Jordanian monarchy. A bloodbath ensued.
Up to 15,000 Palestinian militants and civilians were killed; swaths of Palestinian towns and refugee camps, where the PLO had amassed weapons, were leveled. The PLO leadership was decimated, and between 50,000-100,000 people were left homeless. Arab regimes criticized Hussein for what they called “overkill.”
Before the war, Palestinians had run a state-within-a-state in Jordan, headquartered in Amman. Their militias ruled the streets and imposed brutal and arbitrary discipline with impunity.
King Hussein ended the Palestinians’ reign.
The PLO Is Thrown Out of Jordan
On Sept. 25, 1970, Hussein and the PLO signed a ceasefire mediated by Arab nations. The PLO temporarily maintained control over three towns–Irbid, Ramtha, and Jarash–as well as Dawson Field (or Revolution Field, as the PLO termed it), where the hijacked planes had been blown up.But the PLO’s last gasps were short-lived. Arafat and the PLO were expelled from Jordan by early 1971. They went to Lebanon, where they proceeded to create a similar state-within-a-state, weaponizing a dozen Palestinian refugee camps around Beirut and in South Lebanon, and destabilizing the Lebanese government as they had the Jordanian government, as well as playing a leading role in two wars: the 1973 war between the Lebanese army and the PLO, and the 1975-1990 civil war, in which the PLO fought alongside leftist Muslim militias against Christian militias.
The PLO was expelled from Lebanon following Israel’s 1982 invasion.
Black September’s Consequences
Besides seeding Lebanon’s civil war and disintegration, the Jordanian-Palestinian war of 1970 led to the creation of the Palestinian Black September movement, a commando faction that broke away from the PLO and directed several terrorist plots to avenge Palestinians’ losses in Jordan, including hijackings, the assassination of Jordanian Prime Minister Wasif al-Tel in Cairo on Nov. 28, 1971, and, most notoriously, the murder of 11 Israeli athletes at the 1972 Munich Olympics.
Israel, in turn, unleashed its own operation against Black September as Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir ordered the creation of a hit squad that fanned out in Europe and the Middle East and assassinated numerous Palestinian and Arab operatives. Some were connected with Black September. Some were not, including the murder of Ahmed Bouchiki, an innocent Moroccan waiter, in the Norwegian ski resort of Lillehammer in July 1973.
SOURCE:
Tristam, Pierre. “Black September: The Jordanian-PLO Civil War of 1970.” ThoughtCo, Apr. 5, 2023, thoughtco.com/black-september-jordanian-plo-civil-war-2353168.
@asad abukhalil
Who Started Terrorism in the Arab-Israeli Conflict?
Bombs in Cafes: first used by Zionists in Palestine on March 17th, 1937 in Jaffa.
Bombs on Buses: first used by Zionists in Palestine Aug. 20th-Sep. 26, 1937.
Bombs in Market Places: first used by Zionists on July 6th, 1938 in Haifa.
Bombing of Hotels: first used by Zionists on July 22nd, 1946 in Jerusalem.
Bombing of Foreign Embassies: first used by Zionists on October 1st, 1946 in Rome (against the British).
Mining of Ambulances: First used by Zionists on October 31st, 1946 in Petah Tikvah.
Letter Bombs: first used by Zionists in June 1947 against British targets in UK.
(for documentation, consult The Arab Women’s Information Committee and The Institute for Palestine Studies, Who Are the Terrorists? Aspects of Zionist and Israeli Terrorism, Beirut: Institute for Palestine Studies,Beirut: Institute for Palestine Studies, 1972).
SOURCE: https://www.thoughtco.com/timeline-of-the-lebanese-civil-war-2353188Replies: @Anon, @anon
Timeline of the Lebanese Civil War from 1975 to 1990:
By Pierre Tristam
Pierre Tristam is an award-winning writer who covers Middle East, foreign affairs, immigration, and civil liberties.
Updated on August 12, 2019
The Lebanese Civil War took place from 1975 to 1990 and claimed the lives of some 200,000 people, which left Lebanon in ruins.
1975—1978: Attempted Assassination to Peace Accords
The early years of the conflict began with the attempted assassination of the Phalangist leader Pierre Gemayel and ended with the first Arab-Israeli peace accord brokered by former President Jimmy Carter.
April 13, 1975
Gunmen attempt to assassinate Maronite Christian Phalangist leader Pierre Gemayel as he's leaving church that Sunday. In retaliation, Phalangist gunmen ambush a busload of Palestinians, most of them civilians, killing 27 passengers. Week-long clashes between Palestinian-Muslim forces and Phalangists follow, marking the beginning of Lebanon's 15-year civil war.
June 1976
Some 30,000 Syrian troops enter Lebanon, ostensibly to restore peace. Syria's intervention stops vast military gains against Christians by Palestinian-Muslim forces. The invasion is, in fact, Syria's attempt to claim Lebanon, which it never recognized when Lebanon won independence from France in 1943.
October 1976
Egyptian, Saudi, and other Arab troops in small numbers join the Syrian force as a result of a peace summit brokered in Cairo. The so-called Arab Deterrent Force would be short-lived.
March 11, 1978
Palestinian commandos attack an Israeli kibbutz between Haifa and Tel Aviv, then hijack a bus. Israeli forces respond. By the time the battle was over, 37 Israelis and nine Palestinians were killed.
March 14, 1978
Some 25,000 Israeli soldiers crossed the Lebanese border in Operation Litani, named for the Litani River that crosses South Lebanon, not 20 miles from the Israeli border. The invasion is designed to wipe out the Palestine Liberation Organization's structure in South Lebanon. The operation fails.
March 19, 1978
The United Nations Security Council adopts Resolution 425, sponsored by the United States, calling on Israel to withdraw from South Lebanon and on the UN to establish a 4,000-strong UN peacekeeping force in South Lebanon. The force is termed the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon. Its original mandate was for six months. The force is still in Lebanon today.
June 13, 1978
Israel withdraws, mostly, from occupied territory, handing over authority to the breakaway Lebanese Army force of Maj. Saad Haddad, which expands its operations in South Lebanon, operating as an Israeli ally.
July 1, 1978
Syria turns its guns on Lebanon's Christians, pounding Christian areas of Lebanon in the worst fighting in two years.
September 1978
U.S. President Jimmy Carter brokers the Camp David accords between Israel and Egypt, the first Arab-Israeli peace. Palestinians in Lebanon vow to escalate their attacks on Israel.
1982—1985: Israeli Invasion to Hijacking
The middle years of the conflict began with Israel's invasion of Lebanon and ended with the hijacking of a TWA flight to Beirut by Hezbollah militants. The period also included the killing of 241 U.S. Marines in their Beirut barracks by a suicide bomber.
​June 6, 1982
Israel invades Lebanon again. Gen. Ariel Sharon leads the attack. The two-month drive leads the Israeli army to the southern suburbs of Beirut. The Red Cross estimates the invasion costs the lives of some 18,000 people, mostly civilian Lebanese.
August 24, 1982
A multinational force of U.S. Marines, French paratroopers, and Italian soldiers lands in Beirut to assist in the evacuation of the Palestine Liberation Organization.
August 30, 1982
After intense mediation led by the United States, Yasser Arafat and the Palestine Liberation Organization, which had run a state-within-a-state in West Beirut and South Lebanon, evacuate Lebanon. Some 6,000 PLO fighters go mostly to Tunisia, where they are again dispersed. Most end up in the West Bank and Gaza.
September 10, 1982
The Multinational force completes its withdrawal from Beirut.
Sept. 14, 1982
The Israeli-backed Christian Phalangist leader and Lebanese President-Elect Bashir Gemayel is assassinated at his headquarters in East Beirut.
Sept. 15, 1982
Israeli troops invade West Beirut, the first time an Israeli force enters an Arab capital.
Sept. 15-16, 1982
Under the supervision of Israeli forces, Christian militiamen are bused into the two Palestinian refugee camps of Sabra and Shatila, ostensibly to“mop up†remaining Palestinian fighters. Between 2,000 and 3,000 Palestinian civilians are massacred.
September 23, 1982
Amin Gemayel, brother of Bashir, takes office as Lebanon's president.
September 24, 1982
The U.S.-French-Italian Multinational Force returns to Lebanon in a show of force and support for the Gemayel's government. At first, French and American soldiers play a neutral role. Gradually, they turn into defenders of the Gemayel regime against Druze and Shiites in central and South Lebanon.
April 18, 1983
The American Embassy in Beirut is attacked by a suicide bomb, killing 63. By then, the United States is actively engaged in Lebanon's civil war on the side of the Gemayel government.
May 17, 1983
Lebanon and Israel sign a U.S.-brokered peace agreement that calls for the withdrawal of Israeli troops contingent on the withdrawal of Syrian troops from northern and eastern Lebanon. Syria opposes the agreement, which was never ratified by the Lebanese parliament and canceled in 1987.
October 23, 1983
U.S. Marines barracks near Beirut International Airport, on the south side of the city, are attacked by a suicide bomber in a truck, killing 241 Marines. Moments later, French paratroopers' barracks are attacked by a suicide bomber, killing 58 French soldiers.
Feb. 6, 1984
Predominantly Shiite Muslim militias seize control of West Beirut.
June 10, 1985
The Israeli army finishes withdrawing out of most of Lebanon, but keeps an occupation zone along the Lebanon-Israeli border and calls it its“security zone.†The zone is patrolled by the South Lebanon Army and Israeli soldiers.
June 16, 1985
Hezbollah militants hijack a TWA flight to Beirut, demanding the release of Shiite prisoners in Israeli jails. Militants murder U.S. Navy diver Robert Stethem. The passengers were not freed until two weeks later. Israel, over a period of weeks following the resolution of the hijacking, released some 700 prisoners, insisting the release was not related to the hijacking.
1987—1990: Assassination to Conflict's End
The final years of the conflict started with the assassination of the Lebanon's prime minister and ended with the official end of the civil war in 1990.
June 1, 1987
Lebanese Prime Minister Rashid Karami, a Sunni Muslim, is assassinated when a bomb explodes in his helicopter. He is replaced by Selim el Hoss.
September 22, 1988
The presidency of Amin Gemayel ends without a successor. Lebanon operates under two rival governments: a military government led by renegade general Michel Aoun, and a civil government headed by Selim el Hoss, a Sunni Muslim.
March 14, 1989
Gen. Michel Aoun declares a “war of Liberationâ€against Syrian occupation. The war triggers a devastating final round to the Lebanese Civil War as Christian factions battle it out.
September 22, 1989
The Arab League brokers a cease-fire. Lebanese and Arab leaders meet in Taif, Saudi Arabia, under the leadership of Lebanese Sunni leader Rafik Hariri. The Taif agreement effectively lays the groundwork for an end to the war by reapportioning power in Lebanon. Christians lose their majority in Parliament, settling for a 50-50 split, though the president is to remain a Maronite Christian, the prime minister a Sunni Muslim, and the speaker of Parliament a Shiite Muslim.
November 22, 1989
President-Elect René Muawad, believed to have been a reunification candidate, is assassinated. He is replaced by Elias Harawi. Gen. Emile Lahoud is named to replace Gen. Michel Aoun as commander of the Lebanese army.
October 13, 1990
Syrian forces are given a green light by France and the United States to storm Michel Aoun's presidential palace once Syria joins the American coalition against Saddam Hussein in Operation Desert Shield and Desert Storm.
October 13, 1990
Michel Aoun takes refuge in the French Embassy, then chooses exile in Paris (he was to return as a Hezbollah ally in 2005). October 13, 1990, marks the official end of the Lebanese Civil War. Between 150,000 and 200,000 people, most of them civilians, are believed to have perished in the war.
�
The invasion of Iran by Iraq with green light from US, funded by the reactionary Arab head of states, in addition to full support of Russia and Europe, sending ARMS to Saddam against Iran, from 1980 to 1988, left no time for IR to be involved in any other event except the war by Saddam. So Iran was heavily involved in a brutal war forced upon Iran by Iraq, Arabs, Europe and RUSSIA had NO time for anything else, knowing that Iran did not have arms, including missiles, to defend itself, where Iraq was heavily armed by the Americans, Europeans and Russian missiles to bomb Iranian cities killing thousands of civilian people.
Iran was heavily involved in rebuilding the country soon after the war was over, where caused more than 600,000 deaths and wounded by the enemies, Arabs, US, EU and Russia, and had no TIME for any other event including the Lebanese civil war.
So, the Islamic Republic was attacked by an Arab country with US Green light, to steal Iranian territory and its resources soon after IR came to power, but Iran managed to force the enemy out without losing one inch of its territory to Iraq. Thus, paid a heavy price for it. IR had No time for anything else except to defend her territory.
Hizbollah Formed in 1982 in response to the Israeli invasion of Lebanon, where had nothing to do with Iran. The traitor Christian Lebanese ‘elite’ were working and serving the interests of Israel. Israel was and is after the Lebanese territory, similar to Palestinian and Syrian territory, where Christian ‘elite’ were coopering with Israel. Hizbollah was fighting for the sovereignty of Lebanon sacrificing their lives. Today, the majority of Lebanese people understand the value of Hizbollah, only traitors are still serving the interest of the genocidal US/Israel and the Lebanese ‘elite’.
Israel was responsible for the Lebanese CIVIL WAR, and no one else. Israel wants to steal more land from Lebanon and will bomb Lebanon again until she fulfills her goal if they are not destroyed. Israel is the PROJECT of the US/UK, as MAD DOG, where her mission is to create chaos, wars against the neighboring countries to weaken these states, then partitioning them into smaller pieces because it is easier to control their resources for the interest of the Jews and the EVIL empire.
Genocidal West, including Biden, Trump, Bush, Clinton, are supporting Israel for this reason not because they love the jews. Israel is their PROXY. In fact Israel has been erected by the West to fulfill this goal and DO what is doing.
I am sure Israel will violate the current temporary ceasefire to bomb Lebanon again, hoping for another Civil War in Lebanon. The traitor Christian ‘elite’ must be united with Hizbollah to destroy the Mad Dog, Israel. As long as Israel exists in occupied Palestine, then nothing will be changed. Only the destruction of Israel will bring peace. Israel should be erected on US, UK, France, Germany or Russian territory NOT in Palestine.
Israel has NO right to exist in the occupied Palestine.
Israel was responsible for the Lebanese CIVIL WAR, and no one else. Israel wants to steal more land from Lebanon and will bomb Lebanon again until she fulfills her goal if they are not destroyed.ME: Not true at all. The IDF bombed and later invaded Lebanon in 1982 to fight the PLO which relocated to Southern Lebanon after being expelled from Jordan where the Palestinians tried to assassinate the King Hussein three times. The IDF completely withdrew its forces in 2000 after the expulsion of the PLO from Lebanon. Here's a brief history of the PLO in Jordan:
�
Black September: The Jordanian-PLO Civil War of 1970King Hussein crushes the PLO and expels it from JordanBy Pierre TristamPierre Tristam is an award-winning writer who covers Middle East, foreign affairs, immigration, and civil liberties.Updated on July 03, 2019The Jordanian civil war of September 1970, also known in the Arab world as Black September, was an attempt by the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and the more radical Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) to topple Jordanian King Hussein and seize control of the country.The PFLP sparked the war when it hijacked four jetliners, diverted three of them to a Jordanian airstrip and blew them up, and for three weeks held on to dozens of the 421 hostages it seized as human bargaining chips.Why Palestinians Turned on JordanIn 1970, some two-thirds of the Jordanian population was Palestinian. After the Arabs' defeat in the 1967 Arab-Israeli War, or Six Day War, Palestinian militants took part in the War of Attrition against Israel. The war was mostly fought in Sinai between Egyptian and Israeli forces. But the PLO launched raids from Egypt, Jordan, and Lebanon as well.The Jordanian king had not been keen to fight the 1967 war, nor was he eager to keep letting Palestinians attack Israel from his territory, or from the West Bank, which had been under Jordanian control until Israel occupied it in 1967. King Hussein had maintained secret, cordial relations with Israel through the 1950s and 1960s. But he had to balance his interests in preserving a peace with Israel against a restless and increasingly radicalized Palestinian population, which was threatening his throne.Jordanian army and Palestinian militias led by the PLO fought several bloody battles in the summer of 1970, most violently during the week of June 9-16, when 1,000 people were killed or wounded. On July 10, King Hussein signed an agreement with the PLO's Yasser Arafat pledging support to the Palestinian cause and noninterference in Palestinian commando raids on Israel in exchange for a Palestinian pledge to support Jordanian sovereignty and remove most Palestinian militias from Amman, the Jordanian capital. The agreement proved hollow.Promise of HellWhen Egypt's Gamal Abdel Nasser agreed to a cease-fire in the war of attrition and King Hussein supported the move, PFLP leader George Habash promised that "we will turn the Middle East into a hell," while Arafat invoked the battle of Marathon in 490 B.C. and vowed, before a cheering crowd of 25,000 in Amman on July 31, 1970, that "We will liberate our land."Three times between June 9 and Sept. 1, Hussein escaped assassination attempts, the third time as would-be assassins opened fire on his motorcade while he drove to the airport in Amman to meet his daughter Alia, who was returning from Cairo.The WarBetween Sept. 6 and Sept. 9, Habash's militants hijacked five planes, blew up one and diverted three others to a desert strip in Jordan called Dawson Field, where they blew up the planes on Sept. 12. Rather than receiving the support of King Hussein, the Palestinian hijackers were surrounded by units of the Jordanian military. Even though Arafat worked for the release of the hostages, he also turned his PLO militants loose on the Jordanian monarchy. A bloodbath ensued.Up to 15,000 Palestinian militants and civilians were killed; swaths of Palestinian towns and refugee camps, where the PLO had amassed weapons, were leveled. The PLO leadership was decimated, and between 50,000-100,000 people were left homeless. Arab regimes criticized Hussein for what they called "overkill."Before the war, Palestinians had run a state-within-a-state in Jordan, headquartered in Amman. Their militias ruled the streets and imposed brutal and arbitrary discipline with impunity.King Hussein ended the Palestinians' reign.The PLO Is Thrown Out of Jordan
On Sept. 25, 1970, Hussein and the PLO signed a ceasefire mediated by Arab nations. The PLO temporarily maintained control over three towns--Irbid, Ramtha, and Jarash--as well as Dawson Field (or Revolution Field, as the PLO termed it), where the hijacked planes had been blown up.But the PLO's last gasps were short-lived. Arafat and the PLO were expelled from Jordan by early 1971. They went to Lebanon, where they proceeded to create a similar state-within-a-state, weaponizing a dozen Palestinian refugee camps around Beirut and in South Lebanon, and destabilizing the Lebanese government as they had the Jordanian government, as well as playing a leading role in two wars: the 1973 war between the Lebanese army and the PLO, and the 1975-1990 civil war, in which the PLO fought alongside leftist Muslim militias against Christian militias.The PLO was expelled from Lebanon following Israel's 1982 invasion.Black September's ConsequencesBesides seeding Lebanon's civil war and disintegration, the Jordanian-Palestinian war of 1970 led to the creation of the Palestinian Black September movement, a commando faction that broke away from the PLO and directed several terrorist plots to avenge Palestinians' losses in Jordan, including hijackings, the assassination of Jordanian Prime Minister Wasif al-Tel in Cairo on Nov. 28, 1971, and, most notoriously, the murder of 11 Israeli athletes at the 1972 Munich Olympics.Israel, in turn, unleashed its own operation against Black September as Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir ordered the creation of a hit squad that fanned out in Europe and the Middle East and assassinated numerous Palestinian and Arab operatives. Some were connected with Black September. Some were not, including the murder of Ahmed Bouchiki, an innocent Moroccan waiter, in the Norwegian ski resort of Lillehammer in July 1973.SOURCE:Tristam, Pierre. "Black September: The Jordanian-PLO Civil War of 1970." ThoughtCo, Apr. 5, 2023, thoughtco.com/black-september-jordanian-plo-civil-war-2353168.
�
@asad abukhalilReplies: @antibeast
When I was a kid in the 1960s, there was no Hizbullah and there was not even Palestinian resistance in Lebanon at the time. Yet, Israel was constantly bombing Lebanese Army posts and kidnapping and killing people.
�
Here’s a brief timeline of the Lebanese Civil War from 1975 to 1990:
I find this definition somewhat confusing, outdated and incorrect. No one has ever seen or talked to Satan, so it is safe to assume that he is the product of an altered state of consciousness in medieval scribes caused by the consumption of Amanita muscaria. So Satan is a fiction. On the other hand, the dogmas of the Talmud and the Old Testament are allowed to undermine our way of life, our morals, our very prospects of survival. That is why we should concentrate our efforts on exposing the evils emanating from Talmudist and Chabadist congregations (synagogues and similar places).Replies: @Belis60
Synagogue of Satan
�
Right, but far more Ergot (Claviceps Purpurea) than Amanita Muscaria
Now he is imitating Reagan, hoping that China will disintegrate like the Soviet Union.
Hey, fuck Trump and your terrorist regime. He is married to a whore and needs the office to extort billions from other dummies like MBS. His expenses is too high and he cannot work since he is a Mafia member. Do you know how much money you need to have a KEPT woman who was a whore of the corrupt people? Down with your corrupt ‘rule-based system’, the sooner, the better.
Trump, like many people, believes that it was Reagan who disintegrated the Soviet Union. The disintegration of the Soviet Union brought huge benefits to the United States.
Now he is imitating Reagan, hoping that China will disintegrate like the Soviet Union. He thinks China is equal to the Soviet Union, and he is equal to Reagan.
Reagan created inflation, and Trump will also create inflation. In his thinking and logic, creating inflation = the disintegration of the enemy.
We all know that China is a capitalist country. Although it doesn’t say so in name, the fact is the fact.
Of course, Trump doesn’t care about this. All of Trump’s actions are immediately visible, look powerful, and can make a huge noise in an instant.
No matter what happens later, he has made a huge noise now.
Of course, Trump is cutting taxes for the rich while increasing tariffs, which actually makes American consumers and workers pay more to support the rich. It is visible to the naked eye.
There is no such thing as a "Jew" anymore. Moses invented Judaism. Moses killed Hebroids in order to eventually deliver the Messiah. The Prophets followed his vision. When Jesus Christ appeared, the last of the "Jews" were slipping away into Satanism. Christ became alienated from his own family. Christ became targeted by what was now a Satanic nation. It dawned upon Christ what his fate would be, and he went out with his head held high like a king, knowing of his own return. He eventually became the spiritual King of Western Civilization, the closest in history to uniting heaven and earth per Christ's prophesy in the Lord's Prayer. The "Jews" went into full blown Satanism, and have been inciting against Christendom ever since. Splinters of Hebroids were devastated about what they and their nation did to the Christ, wracked with guilt. They got the ball rolling in what would become the total annihilation of "Israel" (the Satanic state).
It is moral insanity to hate a good and decent human being just because they are Jewish.
�
"Good and decent" should never be conflated with the Synagogue of Satan under any conditions. It's the opening they're looking for to despoil the good and the decent. As Satanists, they're out for the blood of Moses and the blood of Christ, non-stop.
Mind you, being good and decent and human makes being a ‘Jew’ more an act of habit rather than conviction.
�
Synagogue of Satan
I find this definition somewhat confusing, outdated and incorrect. No one has ever seen or talked to Satan, so it is safe to assume that he is the product of an altered state of consciousness in medieval scribes caused by the consumption of Amanita muscaria. So Satan is a fiction. On the other hand, the dogmas of the Talmud and the Old Testament are allowed to undermine our way of life, our morals, our very prospects of survival. That is why we should concentrate our efforts on exposing the evils emanating from Talmudist and Chabadist congregations (synagogues and similar places).
Sorry but you're just making things up. Saddam Hussein started the Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988) because he saw the Iranian Revolution led by Ayatollah Khomeini as an ideological threat to his Iraqi Ba'ath version of pan-Arabism. Israel actually gave military support to Iran which suffered from US sanctions after the Iranian Revolution.
And then, you hold Iran responsible for christian and Jewish criminality? These wars ALWAYS started by Israel and supported by the genocidal US hoping for BIGGER Israel at the expense of making other countries SMALLER, including Iran. Wake up or you will be wiped off the map.
�
SOURCE:
IRAN-IRAQ WAR
The war between Iran and Iraq, lasting nearly eight years, commenced with the Iraqi invasion of Iran on 22 September 1980, and ended with the bilateral acceptance of the UN Security Council Resolution 598 on 20 July 1988. Considered by Iranians as “imposed war†(jang-e taḥmili), the Iran-Iraq War has been called “the longest conventional war of the 20th century,†and cost 1 million casualties and $1.19 trillion (Hiro, 1989, pp. 1-5).
On 22 September 1980, the simmering conflict between Iraq and Iran erupted into a full-scale war with the simultaneous Iraqi air-raids on ten Iranian civilian and military airports and the invasion of Iranian territory along the entire border between the two countries. Prior to the outbreak of the war, relations between the two countries deteriorated steadily in the aftermath of the 1979 Islamic revolution in Iran. This was due not only to personal hostility between Saddam Hussein of Iraq and Ayatollah Khomeini, but also, more importantly, due to the political ambitions of both states as well as ideological and territorial disputes. Ayatollah Khomeini, who had been living in exile in Iraq after 1963, was expelled from that country on 4 October 1978 at the request of the government of Mohammad Reza Shah following the outbreak of political disturbances in Iran.
On 28 September, six days after the Iraqi military invaded Iran, the UN Security Council called on both countries to refrain immediately from further use of force. Iraq declared its willingness to negotiate, but only if and when Iran accepted the Iraqi demands articulated by the Iraqi deputy prime minister, Tariq Aziz (Masserat, p. 55). These included a mutual guarantee of non-intervention in the affairs of the other country; an Iranian undertaking to cease all acts of “aggression†toward Iraq; Iran’s recognition of Iraqi sovereignty over all territories and waterways it claimed, including the Shatt al-Arab/Arvand Rud waterway.
THE CAUSES OF THE WAR
The pretext for the Iraqi invasion of Iran. Iraq claimed it was engaged in a defensive war and was “obliged to exercise its legitimate right to self-defense of sovereignty and territorial integrity and to recover its territories by force, considering that the Iranian Government had barred the way to all legally recognized ways to resolve the issues emanating from its obligations†(Dekker and Post, p. 84). Before the invasion, Iraq frequently had accused Iran of acts of aggression against Iraq and of interfering in Iraq’s internal affairs, such as supporting the banned al-DaÊ¿wa Party (Menashri, p. 157). In Arabic-language radio broadcasts Iranian leaders vehemently vilified the Ba’th regime as anti-Islamic and a puppet of imperialist powers. The regime in Baghdad also was accused of acts of aggression against Iran by publicly supporting separatist insurgents in Khuzestan, promising them assistance in liberating ‘Arabestan,’ the name adopted by the Iraqi regime for the old Persian province. According to the governor-general of Khuzestan, Admiral Aḥmad Madani, Iraq was supplying arms to the rebels (Keesings, 1980, p. 609). On several occasions, Iraq even had carried out attacks on Iranian border towns, for instance on Kurdish towns in north-western Iran in June 1979 and the following month on á¹¢ÄleḥÄbÄd in the south, where several people were killed. During the first half of 1980 additional border clashes occurred.
The Iraqi claim of sovereignty over all contested territories and waterways revived the old territorial dispute between the two countries (Dessouki, p. 2). The most contentious territorial disagreement was over the Shatt al-Arab and other waterways. In addition, three small islands in the Persian Gulf were also part of Hussein’s unsubstantiated territorial claims. The islands of Abu MusÄ and Greater and Lesser Tonbs (qq.v. at iranica.com), far from the Iraqi border, are close to the Strait of Hormuz and of great strategic importance. Until the late 19th and early 20th century, when the British occupied a number of Iranian islands and administered them through Arab sheikhs, as British protectorates, these islands had been parts of Iranian territory. The Iranian Abu MusÄ was administered on behalf of Great Britain by the sheikh of Sharjah and the two other islands by Raʾs al-Khaymah, both of these sheikhdoms later joining the United Arab Emirates. Iran had recaptured the islands on 30 November 1971, a few days before the United Arab Emirates came into existence following its independence from Britain. Iran quickly recognized the newly-created emirate. In September 1980, Iraq made an unfounded and provocative claim to sovereignty over the three islands on behalf of the “Arab nation,†demanding Iranian recognition of Iraq’s “legitimate†rights (Balta, p. 102).
The boundary disputes. The main dispute revolved around the demarcation of the boundary in the Shatt al-Arab waterway and the Iraqi claim to the Iranian province of Khuzestan. According to the pan-Arab ideology of the Ba’th party, Khuzestan belonged to the Arab nation and should return to Arab hands (Pipes, p. 23). The most important bone of contention, however, was over the Shatt al-Arab waterway, which is formed by the confluence of the Tigris, Euphrates, and KÄrun rivers (Grummon, p. 3). The final 55 miles of the 130-mile Shatt al-Arab waterway form the frontier between Iraq and Iran. The Shatt al-Arab is of economic and strategic importance to both countries. Basra, the only Iraqi port with an outlet to the Persian Gulf, lies 47 miles upstream, and large oil installations in both countries are located near the Shatt al-Arab (for a historical sketch of the disputes, see v and vi, above; see also PÄrsÄdust, 1990a).
After the dissolution of the Ottoman empire, with Iraq first becoming a British mandate in 1920 and then an independent state in 1932, Iran repudiated the demarcation line established in the Constantinople Protocol of November 1913 (see vi, above). Iran wanted the border to run along the thalweg, the deepest point of the navigable channel, maintaining that the Constantinople Protocol had been the legacy of colonial rule. Iraq, encouraged and supported by Britain, took Iran to the League of Nations in 1934, but no settlement was reached. Negotiations between the two countries continued, and in 1937 Iran and Iraq signed their first boundary treaty. Among other things, the treaty established the waterway border on the eastern bank of the river except for a four-mile anchorage zone near Ä€bÄdÄn, which was allotted to Iran and where the border ran along the thalweg. Years later, Iraq accused Iran of taking advantage of Iraq’s weak negotiating position at a time when Iraq was beset by internal political turmoil following the military coup of November 1936 by Nuri al-Said (Abdulghani, p. 116).
For three decades no important developments in the dispute occurred. But in the 1960s, when Iran had become a strong regional power and Iraq was weakened by several coups, Iran again took advantage of Iraq’s political vulnerability. First, it sent a delegation to Iraq soon after the Ba’th coup in 1969 and, when Iraq refused to proceed with negotiations over a new treaty, Iran abrogated the treaty of 1937. Then, it further pressured Iraq by supporting the Kurdish rebels in the north. Iraq was obliged to give in to Iranian demands concerning the Shatt al-Arab, in exchange for an Iranian promise to end its support of Kurdish rebels (Ismael, p. 20). This resulted in the Algiers Protocol of 1975, in which the thalweg was for the first time recognized as the border between the two countries along the entire length of the Shatt al-Arab. But five years later, on 17 September 1980, Iraq suddenly abrogated the Algiers Protocol following the Iranian revolution. In his speech to the National Assembly, Saddam Hussein claimed that the Islamic Republic of Iran refused to abide by the stipulations of the Algiers Protocol and, therefore, Iraq considered the Protocol null and void. Furthermore, Hussein declared in the same speech that the entire Shatt al-Arab had been Iraqi-Arab throughout history and that Iraqi authority over the Shatt al-Arab should be restored. Five days later, the Iraqi army crossed the border (see PÄrsÄdust, 1990b; Anvari Tehrani, 1993).
Iraq’s objectives in invading Iran. There were several factors which jointly or independently appear to have influenced the Iraqi regime’s decision to initiate a war. These factors can be divided into aims and motives: Saddam Hussein’s ambition for political and economic hegemony in the Persian Gulf; achieving control of the entire Shatt al-Arab waterway and capturing territories claimed by Iraq; strengthening Iraqi security and counteracting the effect of Iran’s Islamic revolution on the large Iraqi Shiʿite population. The post-revolutionary political turmoil in Iran, the collapse of Iranian armed forces, as well as the encouragement by the elites of the Iranian ancien regime in exile, evidently were perceived by Iraqi leaders as circumstances offering an ideal opportunity to wage war.
The ideology of the Islamic Republic of Iran, and especially the attempt to export the Islamic revolution to other Muslim countries, was seen by Iraqi leaders as a threat to the secular ideology of their Ba’th party and as a danger to the stability of the country. Iranian propaganda, aimed at Iraq’s disaffected population, focused on the un-Islamic character of the secular Ba’th ideology and was intended to incite Iraqis to revolt and topple the regime of Saddam Hussein (Maddy-Weitzmann, p. 181).
�
You are a gullible liar.
These are the words of a Lebanese Person who lived in Lebanon:
@asad abukhalil
When I was a kid in the 1960s, there was no Hizbullah and there was not even Palestinian resistance in Lebanon at the time. Yet, Israel was constantly bombing Lebanese Army posts and kidnapping and killing people.
SOURCE: https://www.thoughtco.com/timeline-of-the-lebanese-civil-war-2353188Replies: @Anon, @anon
Timeline of the Lebanese Civil War from 1975 to 1990:
By Pierre Tristam
Pierre Tristam is an award-winning writer who covers Middle East, foreign affairs, immigration, and civil liberties.
Updated on August 12, 2019
The Lebanese Civil War took place from 1975 to 1990 and claimed the lives of some 200,000 people, which left Lebanon in ruins.
1975—1978: Attempted Assassination to Peace Accords
The early years of the conflict began with the attempted assassination of the Phalangist leader Pierre Gemayel and ended with the first Arab-Israeli peace accord brokered by former President Jimmy Carter.
April 13, 1975
Gunmen attempt to assassinate Maronite Christian Phalangist leader Pierre Gemayel as he's leaving church that Sunday. In retaliation, Phalangist gunmen ambush a busload of Palestinians, most of them civilians, killing 27 passengers. Week-long clashes between Palestinian-Muslim forces and Phalangists follow, marking the beginning of Lebanon's 15-year civil war.
June 1976
Some 30,000 Syrian troops enter Lebanon, ostensibly to restore peace. Syria's intervention stops vast military gains against Christians by Palestinian-Muslim forces. The invasion is, in fact, Syria's attempt to claim Lebanon, which it never recognized when Lebanon won independence from France in 1943.
October 1976
Egyptian, Saudi, and other Arab troops in small numbers join the Syrian force as a result of a peace summit brokered in Cairo. The so-called Arab Deterrent Force would be short-lived.
March 11, 1978
Palestinian commandos attack an Israeli kibbutz between Haifa and Tel Aviv, then hijack a bus. Israeli forces respond. By the time the battle was over, 37 Israelis and nine Palestinians were killed.
March 14, 1978
Some 25,000 Israeli soldiers crossed the Lebanese border in Operation Litani, named for the Litani River that crosses South Lebanon, not 20 miles from the Israeli border. The invasion is designed to wipe out the Palestine Liberation Organization's structure in South Lebanon. The operation fails.
March 19, 1978
The United Nations Security Council adopts Resolution 425, sponsored by the United States, calling on Israel to withdraw from South Lebanon and on the UN to establish a 4,000-strong UN peacekeeping force in South Lebanon. The force is termed the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon. Its original mandate was for six months. The force is still in Lebanon today.
June 13, 1978
Israel withdraws, mostly, from occupied territory, handing over authority to the breakaway Lebanese Army force of Maj. Saad Haddad, which expands its operations in South Lebanon, operating as an Israeli ally.
July 1, 1978
Syria turns its guns on Lebanon's Christians, pounding Christian areas of Lebanon in the worst fighting in two years.
September 1978
U.S. President Jimmy Carter brokers the Camp David accords between Israel and Egypt, the first Arab-Israeli peace. Palestinians in Lebanon vow to escalate their attacks on Israel.
1982—1985: Israeli Invasion to Hijacking
The middle years of the conflict began with Israel's invasion of Lebanon and ended with the hijacking of a TWA flight to Beirut by Hezbollah militants. The period also included the killing of 241 U.S. Marines in their Beirut barracks by a suicide bomber.
​June 6, 1982
Israel invades Lebanon again. Gen. Ariel Sharon leads the attack. The two-month drive leads the Israeli army to the southern suburbs of Beirut. The Red Cross estimates the invasion costs the lives of some 18,000 people, mostly civilian Lebanese.
August 24, 1982
A multinational force of U.S. Marines, French paratroopers, and Italian soldiers lands in Beirut to assist in the evacuation of the Palestine Liberation Organization.
August 30, 1982
After intense mediation led by the United States, Yasser Arafat and the Palestine Liberation Organization, which had run a state-within-a-state in West Beirut and South Lebanon, evacuate Lebanon. Some 6,000 PLO fighters go mostly to Tunisia, where they are again dispersed. Most end up in the West Bank and Gaza.
September 10, 1982
The Multinational force completes its withdrawal from Beirut.
Sept. 14, 1982
The Israeli-backed Christian Phalangist leader and Lebanese President-Elect Bashir Gemayel is assassinated at his headquarters in East Beirut.
Sept. 15, 1982
Israeli troops invade West Beirut, the first time an Israeli force enters an Arab capital.
Sept. 15-16, 1982
Under the supervision of Israeli forces, Christian militiamen are bused into the two Palestinian refugee camps of Sabra and Shatila, ostensibly to“mop up†remaining Palestinian fighters. Between 2,000 and 3,000 Palestinian civilians are massacred.
September 23, 1982
Amin Gemayel, brother of Bashir, takes office as Lebanon's president.
September 24, 1982
The U.S.-French-Italian Multinational Force returns to Lebanon in a show of force and support for the Gemayel's government. At first, French and American soldiers play a neutral role. Gradually, they turn into defenders of the Gemayel regime against Druze and Shiites in central and South Lebanon.
April 18, 1983
The American Embassy in Beirut is attacked by a suicide bomb, killing 63. By then, the United States is actively engaged in Lebanon's civil war on the side of the Gemayel government.
May 17, 1983
Lebanon and Israel sign a U.S.-brokered peace agreement that calls for the withdrawal of Israeli troops contingent on the withdrawal of Syrian troops from northern and eastern Lebanon. Syria opposes the agreement, which was never ratified by the Lebanese parliament and canceled in 1987.
October 23, 1983
U.S. Marines barracks near Beirut International Airport, on the south side of the city, are attacked by a suicide bomber in a truck, killing 241 Marines. Moments later, French paratroopers' barracks are attacked by a suicide bomber, killing 58 French soldiers.
Feb. 6, 1984
Predominantly Shiite Muslim militias seize control of West Beirut.
June 10, 1985
The Israeli army finishes withdrawing out of most of Lebanon, but keeps an occupation zone along the Lebanon-Israeli border and calls it its“security zone.†The zone is patrolled by the South Lebanon Army and Israeli soldiers.
June 16, 1985
Hezbollah militants hijack a TWA flight to Beirut, demanding the release of Shiite prisoners in Israeli jails. Militants murder U.S. Navy diver Robert Stethem. The passengers were not freed until two weeks later. Israel, over a period of weeks following the resolution of the hijacking, released some 700 prisoners, insisting the release was not related to the hijacking.
1987—1990: Assassination to Conflict's End
The final years of the conflict started with the assassination of the Lebanon's prime minister and ended with the official end of the civil war in 1990.
June 1, 1987
Lebanese Prime Minister Rashid Karami, a Sunni Muslim, is assassinated when a bomb explodes in his helicopter. He is replaced by Selim el Hoss.
September 22, 1988
The presidency of Amin Gemayel ends without a successor. Lebanon operates under two rival governments: a military government led by renegade general Michel Aoun, and a civil government headed by Selim el Hoss, a Sunni Muslim.
March 14, 1989
Gen. Michel Aoun declares a “war of Liberationâ€against Syrian occupation. The war triggers a devastating final round to the Lebanese Civil War as Christian factions battle it out.
September 22, 1989
The Arab League brokers a cease-fire. Lebanese and Arab leaders meet in Taif, Saudi Arabia, under the leadership of Lebanese Sunni leader Rafik Hariri. The Taif agreement effectively lays the groundwork for an end to the war by reapportioning power in Lebanon. Christians lose their majority in Parliament, settling for a 50-50 split, though the president is to remain a Maronite Christian, the prime minister a Sunni Muslim, and the speaker of Parliament a Shiite Muslim.
November 22, 1989
President-Elect René Muawad, believed to have been a reunification candidate, is assassinated. He is replaced by Elias Harawi. Gen. Emile Lahoud is named to replace Gen. Michel Aoun as commander of the Lebanese army.
October 13, 1990
Syrian forces are given a green light by France and the United States to storm Michel Aoun's presidential palace once Syria joins the American coalition against Saddam Hussein in Operation Desert Shield and Desert Storm.
October 13, 1990
Michel Aoun takes refuge in the French Embassy, then chooses exile in Paris (he was to return as a Hezbollah ally in 2005). October 13, 1990, marks the official end of the Lebanese Civil War. Between 150,000 and 200,000 people, most of them civilians, are believed to have perished in the war.
�
Thanks,
especially coming from you.
Sorry but you're just making things up. Saddam Hussein started the Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988) because he saw the Iranian Revolution led by Ayatollah Khomeini as an ideological threat to his Iraqi Ba'ath version of pan-Arabism. Israel actually gave military support to Iran which suffered from US sanctions after the Iranian Revolution.
And then, you hold Iran responsible for christian and Jewish criminality? These wars ALWAYS started by Israel and supported by the genocidal US hoping for BIGGER Israel at the expense of making other countries SMALLER, including Iran. Wake up or you will be wiped off the map.
�
SOURCE:
IRAN-IRAQ WAR
The war between Iran and Iraq, lasting nearly eight years, commenced with the Iraqi invasion of Iran on 22 September 1980, and ended with the bilateral acceptance of the UN Security Council Resolution 598 on 20 July 1988. Considered by Iranians as “imposed war†(jang-e taḥmili), the Iran-Iraq War has been called “the longest conventional war of the 20th century,†and cost 1 million casualties and $1.19 trillion (Hiro, 1989, pp. 1-5).
On 22 September 1980, the simmering conflict between Iraq and Iran erupted into a full-scale war with the simultaneous Iraqi air-raids on ten Iranian civilian and military airports and the invasion of Iranian territory along the entire border between the two countries. Prior to the outbreak of the war, relations between the two countries deteriorated steadily in the aftermath of the 1979 Islamic revolution in Iran. This was due not only to personal hostility between Saddam Hussein of Iraq and Ayatollah Khomeini, but also, more importantly, due to the political ambitions of both states as well as ideological and territorial disputes. Ayatollah Khomeini, who had been living in exile in Iraq after 1963, was expelled from that country on 4 October 1978 at the request of the government of Mohammad Reza Shah following the outbreak of political disturbances in Iran.
On 28 September, six days after the Iraqi military invaded Iran, the UN Security Council called on both countries to refrain immediately from further use of force. Iraq declared its willingness to negotiate, but only if and when Iran accepted the Iraqi demands articulated by the Iraqi deputy prime minister, Tariq Aziz (Masserat, p. 55). These included a mutual guarantee of non-intervention in the affairs of the other country; an Iranian undertaking to cease all acts of “aggression†toward Iraq; Iran’s recognition of Iraqi sovereignty over all territories and waterways it claimed, including the Shatt al-Arab/Arvand Rud waterway.
THE CAUSES OF THE WAR
The pretext for the Iraqi invasion of Iran. Iraq claimed it was engaged in a defensive war and was “obliged to exercise its legitimate right to self-defense of sovereignty and territorial integrity and to recover its territories by force, considering that the Iranian Government had barred the way to all legally recognized ways to resolve the issues emanating from its obligations†(Dekker and Post, p. 84). Before the invasion, Iraq frequently had accused Iran of acts of aggression against Iraq and of interfering in Iraq’s internal affairs, such as supporting the banned al-DaÊ¿wa Party (Menashri, p. 157). In Arabic-language radio broadcasts Iranian leaders vehemently vilified the Ba’th regime as anti-Islamic and a puppet of imperialist powers. The regime in Baghdad also was accused of acts of aggression against Iran by publicly supporting separatist insurgents in Khuzestan, promising them assistance in liberating ‘Arabestan,’ the name adopted by the Iraqi regime for the old Persian province. According to the governor-general of Khuzestan, Admiral Aḥmad Madani, Iraq was supplying arms to the rebels (Keesings, 1980, p. 609). On several occasions, Iraq even had carried out attacks on Iranian border towns, for instance on Kurdish towns in north-western Iran in June 1979 and the following month on á¹¢ÄleḥÄbÄd in the south, where several people were killed. During the first half of 1980 additional border clashes occurred.
The Iraqi claim of sovereignty over all contested territories and waterways revived the old territorial dispute between the two countries (Dessouki, p. 2). The most contentious territorial disagreement was over the Shatt al-Arab and other waterways. In addition, three small islands in the Persian Gulf were also part of Hussein’s unsubstantiated territorial claims. The islands of Abu MusÄ and Greater and Lesser Tonbs (qq.v. at iranica.com), far from the Iraqi border, are close to the Strait of Hormuz and of great strategic importance. Until the late 19th and early 20th century, when the British occupied a number of Iranian islands and administered them through Arab sheikhs, as British protectorates, these islands had been parts of Iranian territory. The Iranian Abu MusÄ was administered on behalf of Great Britain by the sheikh of Sharjah and the two other islands by Raʾs al-Khaymah, both of these sheikhdoms later joining the United Arab Emirates. Iran had recaptured the islands on 30 November 1971, a few days before the United Arab Emirates came into existence following its independence from Britain. Iran quickly recognized the newly-created emirate. In September 1980, Iraq made an unfounded and provocative claim to sovereignty over the three islands on behalf of the “Arab nation,†demanding Iranian recognition of Iraq’s “legitimate†rights (Balta, p. 102).
The boundary disputes. The main dispute revolved around the demarcation of the boundary in the Shatt al-Arab waterway and the Iraqi claim to the Iranian province of Khuzestan. According to the pan-Arab ideology of the Ba’th party, Khuzestan belonged to the Arab nation and should return to Arab hands (Pipes, p. 23). The most important bone of contention, however, was over the Shatt al-Arab waterway, which is formed by the confluence of the Tigris, Euphrates, and KÄrun rivers (Grummon, p. 3). The final 55 miles of the 130-mile Shatt al-Arab waterway form the frontier between Iraq and Iran. The Shatt al-Arab is of economic and strategic importance to both countries. Basra, the only Iraqi port with an outlet to the Persian Gulf, lies 47 miles upstream, and large oil installations in both countries are located near the Shatt al-Arab (for a historical sketch of the disputes, see v and vi, above; see also PÄrsÄdust, 1990a).
After the dissolution of the Ottoman empire, with Iraq first becoming a British mandate in 1920 and then an independent state in 1932, Iran repudiated the demarcation line established in the Constantinople Protocol of November 1913 (see vi, above). Iran wanted the border to run along the thalweg, the deepest point of the navigable channel, maintaining that the Constantinople Protocol had been the legacy of colonial rule. Iraq, encouraged and supported by Britain, took Iran to the League of Nations in 1934, but no settlement was reached. Negotiations between the two countries continued, and in 1937 Iran and Iraq signed their first boundary treaty. Among other things, the treaty established the waterway border on the eastern bank of the river except for a four-mile anchorage zone near Ä€bÄdÄn, which was allotted to Iran and where the border ran along the thalweg. Years later, Iraq accused Iran of taking advantage of Iraq’s weak negotiating position at a time when Iraq was beset by internal political turmoil following the military coup of November 1936 by Nuri al-Said (Abdulghani, p. 116).
For three decades no important developments in the dispute occurred. But in the 1960s, when Iran had become a strong regional power and Iraq was weakened by several coups, Iran again took advantage of Iraq’s political vulnerability. First, it sent a delegation to Iraq soon after the Ba’th coup in 1969 and, when Iraq refused to proceed with negotiations over a new treaty, Iran abrogated the treaty of 1937. Then, it further pressured Iraq by supporting the Kurdish rebels in the north. Iraq was obliged to give in to Iranian demands concerning the Shatt al-Arab, in exchange for an Iranian promise to end its support of Kurdish rebels (Ismael, p. 20). This resulted in the Algiers Protocol of 1975, in which the thalweg was for the first time recognized as the border between the two countries along the entire length of the Shatt al-Arab. But five years later, on 17 September 1980, Iraq suddenly abrogated the Algiers Protocol following the Iranian revolution. In his speech to the National Assembly, Saddam Hussein claimed that the Islamic Republic of Iran refused to abide by the stipulations of the Algiers Protocol and, therefore, Iraq considered the Protocol null and void. Furthermore, Hussein declared in the same speech that the entire Shatt al-Arab had been Iraqi-Arab throughout history and that Iraqi authority over the Shatt al-Arab should be restored. Five days later, the Iraqi army crossed the border (see PÄrsÄdust, 1990b; Anvari Tehrani, 1993).
Iraq’s objectives in invading Iran. There were several factors which jointly or independently appear to have influenced the Iraqi regime’s decision to initiate a war. These factors can be divided into aims and motives: Saddam Hussein’s ambition for political and economic hegemony in the Persian Gulf; achieving control of the entire Shatt al-Arab waterway and capturing territories claimed by Iraq; strengthening Iraqi security and counteracting the effect of Iran’s Islamic revolution on the large Iraqi Shiʿite population. The post-revolutionary political turmoil in Iran, the collapse of Iranian armed forces, as well as the encouragement by the elites of the Iranian ancien regime in exile, evidently were perceived by Iraqi leaders as circumstances offering an ideal opportunity to wage war.
The ideology of the Islamic Republic of Iran, and especially the attempt to export the Islamic revolution to other Muslim countries, was seen by Iraqi leaders as a threat to the secular ideology of their Ba’th party and as a danger to the stability of the country. Iranian propaganda, aimed at Iraq’s disaffected population, focused on the un-Islamic character of the secular Ba’th ideology and was intended to incite Iraqis to revolt and topple the regime of Saddam Hussein (Maddy-Weitzmann, p. 181).
�
This is BS, and has nothing to do with my comment. What have you been smoking?
An aspect generally overlooked by the American public is the giant co-responsibility of the European Commission – an ally or a colony of USA Dems since Obama – in the Ukrainian war.
The EU Commission – i.e. the unelected and irresponsable Government of the EU – has two undeclared priorities: territorial extension in the East in chronic conflict with Russia, and the control of Member States spending in Western Europe, in order to continue financing the Eastern European countries.
It completely escapes the American public that since 2004, with the accession to the EU of the Eastern European countries, for 20 years the EU Commission has transferred aids and subsidies to the Eastern European countries, worth between 3% and 5% of their annual gnp. That money comes from the annual contributions of Germany, UK before the Brexit, France, Italy etc.
A giant transfer of resources from Western to Eastern Europe, a 20 years old undeclared new Marshall plan. The Poles have used a big part of that money to rearm, while the warmongering 3 Baltic dwarfs are fully subsidized by the EU Commission.
Thìs giant transfer – to say the pitiful truth – also escape the gross majority of Western European’s public opinion, thanks to the EU Commission’s propaganda. In facts, the enemies of the EU accuse its “neoliberist policies†and they totally overlook the keynesian giant interventionism of the EU in favour of confrontation with Russia, subsidizing Eastern Europe and supporting the Green Agenda.
This strategy – confrontation with Russia, keyenesian assistentialism to Eastern Europe and for the Green Agenda – over the last 20 years has been a giant failure, since the EU has lost around 30% of growth rate, salaries and purchasing power respect to the USA. And by the technological point of view, Europe today is well behind the USA, China, Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, Singapore, etc. Unfortunately, thanks again to the EU Commission’s propaganda, the European public opinion is not remotely aware of the growing GAP.
Here in Europe many hope that Trump’s tariffs to the European export to the USA will definitively provoke a major upheaval in the EU. The long standing undeclared EU strategy must be radically revised and certainly Mrs Albrecht VDL – a servant of USA Dems and of the neo globalist lobby – is not remotely up to the task.
Mario Draghi has proposed a giant plan of reforms of the EU economies, with 800 billions of new EU and/or Member States debt, but until today has received support only from the Latin countries. Latin countries who are prevented from spending because their public debt is beyond 60% of their gnp. But since 2004, also the Latin countries have been subsidizing the Eastern European countries, whose debt of course has not grown. In short, the Eastern European countries prefer the status quo (except Orban and Fico, confrontation with Russia obviously included), in order to keep the 20 years long bonanza on, while Germany and her satellites (The Netherlands, Denmark and Nordic countries) do not want more debt, especially if assumed together with the Latin countries (the old Protestant prejudice – plus Max Weber – against Latin and Catholic countries).
In short, I think and hope that Trump’s tariffs will provoke a giant clash among Germany and satellites, Latin countries and Eastern European countries, starting from next spring. It will be also very important – and funny – to observe how Germany will form a government after next February elections: the CDU should take 30-33% and Alternative for Germany 17-20%, with the Social Democrats and the Greens behind……good luck!
Another fantastic major upheaval in Europe might come from Trump decision to stop military assistance to Ukraine and/or from the USA-led peace negotiation with Russia. Unbelievable, but already the EU Commission, the UK, France, Poland and the Baltic dwarfs, and apparently even Italy have expressed “their reservations†for “a Russian victory at the negotiation tableâ€. It is evident they do not want a revision of the priority of the confrontation with Russia, in spite of the recent set back in the last domino’s peace, the Republic of Georgia.
Make my day: how could the policy of EU extension in the East go on, without the USA support? How could the EU keep arming Ukraine, without the USA?
We anti EU are so happy here in Europe! What a brawl and what a flight of rags we are going to see! From Europe: thanks again, Donald Trump!
The U.S. needs to think long-term. Iran’s mullahs won’t rule forever and Americas association with economic hardship and violence won’t benefit it in the future
The Iranian people are aware that mullahs (not America) are using violence against them. For example, beating women to death for improper head covering.
They also realize that Khamenei is the source of economic hardship. How much money is he sending abroad rather than spending at home?
I am sure any poll monitored by the theocracy would show dislike of America. It seems likely that their private views differ from state mandated ones, but that is hard to prove.
____
Khamenei is the key driver of violence in the region. Iranian Hamas, Iranian Hezbollah, Iranian Houthis, etc. There is no indication that this will moderate during his lifetime. Containment is needed as long as he is supreme leader.
Hopefully, Khamenei will be the last Ayatollah. Iran is primed for internal regime change. The military has become capitalist via State Owned Enterprises. The no longer particularly revolutionary guard corps views the mullahs as “bad for their business”. And, there is barely suppressed popular resentment against the oppressive theocracy.
It is easy to envision scenarios along the lines of the Egypt model. The next leader could be a current or former military leader, much like Abd el-Fattah el-Sisi. Once this happens, a reset will be possible.
PEACE 😇
Let’s not be fools or stupid.
Trump is a Zionist as he demonstrated in his first presidency and he will work more in favor of Israel this time and may even think of being a shareholder if Iran were destroyed and its oil seized.
We should not even doubt that he is capable of using nuclear weapons against the Iranian people to go down in history with his own genocide.
Remember when he said that if he went out on the street and killed someone nothing would happen.
A guy with a stupid ideology that does not give for anything else and please… miracles do not exist.
Are you a christian Lebanese? why don't you acknowedge that the creation of Israel has caused these wars because the goal of 'Israel Project' in Palestine by the West is to capture the region and its resources to be used against west perceived enemy like Iran, china and Russia. Israel is the MAD DOG of the west and unless is not DESTROYED, we continue having wars and genocide. The Christians in Lebanon, always played another SERVANT of Israel against the interest of majority Muslims. They have to stop giving services to the enemy of humanity US, ISRAE, FRANCE even Germany.The criminal West, Arab head of states, and Russia, forced a war, through Saddam, on Iran where the country was fully engaged in defending its borders until 1988, so Iran did not have anything to do with the Lebanese civil war. Iran didn't have arms to defend herself, thus, one million of its own youth were killed or injured by the western weapon transfer to Iraq, including Russia, and use of chemical weapons where the CRIMINAL west provided to Saddam.
But you’re wrong when you claim that Iran had nothing to do with Hezbollah which not only fought against IDF forces in Southern Lebanon but also participated in the Lebanese Civil War with military support from Iran.
�
Israel took more direct role three years into the war: In March 1978, it invaded Lebanon. By the time Israeli forces withdrew later that month, more than 2,000 Lebanese and Palestinians had been killed, 200,000 displaced, and dozens of villages in the south damaged. Before the invasion, combined left-wing Lebanese and Palestinian forces had made important gains. Israel’s attack, however, strengthened its relationship with the Maronite forces, which would continue through a second Israeli invasion in 1982. So, it was not Hizbollah alone, but the Lebanese left, refugees who were defending Lebanon against evil, but the Christian elite were playing BALLS with Israel/US against the people of Lebanon. The war finally ended in 1990, following the Taif agreement, which altered the balance of power within Lebanon’s government. But that resolution failed to address the war’s root causes, perpetuating the sectarian dynamics that still plague Lebanese society. Due to western control, Lebanon has been divided into three sects the Christians, Sunni, and Shiite, in order to continue the occupation of Lebanon by the west and its MAD DOG, Israel. The criminal West has forced the same divisive system in occupied Iraq. Divide and conquer, is the game.
After the expulsion of the PLO from Lebanon, Israel withdrew all of its IDF forces in 2000, ... , the UN Security Council passed its Resolution 1701 which mandated the disarmanent of all militias including the Hezbollah and its transfer to north of the Litani River in ....
�
And then, you hold Iran responsible for christian and Jewish criminality? These wars ALWAYS started by Israel and supported by the genocidal US hoping for BIGGER Israel at the expense of making other countries SMALLER, including Iran. Wake up or you will be wiped off the map.
Sorry but you’re just making things up. Saddam Hussein started the Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988) because he saw the Iranian Revolution led by Ayatollah Khomeini as an ideological threat to his Iraqi Ba’ath version of pan-Arabism. Israel actually gave military support to Iran which suffered from US sanctions after the Iranian Revolution.
Here’s a brief summary of the history of the Iran-Iraq War and its causes:
@asad abukhalilReplies: @antibeast
When I was a kid in the 1960s, there was no Hizbullah and there was not even Palestinian resistance in Lebanon at the time. Yet, Israel was constantly bombing Lebanese Army posts and kidnapping and killing people.
�
What will Trump be able to do?
Trump is slowly being cornered and contained by the deep state, Matt Gaetz is the first to go before he has been sworn in, next will be JFK jnr, by the time we reach the inauguration I suspect all the usual neocons will be in place.
If Americans want different they need a coup…they have to physically remove those at the top, they’re criminals and don’t play by any rules except their own self interest.
You're right that Hezbollah was founded in 1982 right after Israel invaded Southern Lebanon in response to attacks from the PLO which was based there. But you're wrong when you claim that Iran had nothing to do with Hezbollah which not only fought against IDF forces in Southern Lebanon but also participated in the Lebanese Civil War with military support from Iran. That Civil War devastated Lebanon by pitting Christians vs Muslims which forced the mass emigration of Lebanese Christians fleeing their country now balkanized along sectarian lines. After the expulsion of the PLO from Lebanon, Israel withdrew all of its IDF forces in 2000, ending its two-decade long military occupation there. Thereafter, the UN Security Council passed its Resolution 1701 which mandated the disarmanent of all militias including the Hezbollah and its transfer to north of the Litani River in order to allow UN peacekeeping forces to maintain peace and order in Southern Lebanon.
Israel invaded Lebanon before Hizbollah was created. Hizbollah fought to force the enemy of Lebanan, Israel, out of the country by sacrificing their own lives. In fact, Hizbollah came into being due to Israel invasion of Lebanon and Iran had nothing to do with it.
�
But you’re wrong when you claim that Iran had nothing to do with Hezbollah which not only fought against IDF forces in Southern Lebanon but also participated in the Lebanese Civil War with military support from Iran.
Are you a christian Lebanese? why don’t you acknowedge that the creation of Israel has caused these wars because the goal of ‘Israel Project’ in Palestine by the West is to capture the region and its resources to be used against west perceived enemy like Iran, china and Russia. Israel is the MAD DOG of the west and unless is not DESTROYED, we continue having wars and genocide. The Christians in Lebanon, always played another SERVANT of Israel against the interest of majority Muslims. They have to stop giving services to the enemy of humanity US, ISRAE, FRANCE even Germany.The criminal West, Arab head of states, and Russia, forced a war, through Saddam, on Iran where the country was fully engaged in defending its borders until 1988, so Iran did not have anything to do with the Lebanese civil war. Iran didn’t have arms to defend herself, thus, one million of its own youth were killed or injured by the western weapon transfer to Iraq, including Russia, and use of chemical weapons where the CRIMINAL west provided to Saddam.
On the other hand, the tensions exploded in April 1975, when Christian nationalist militants attacked a bus carrying Palestinian fighters and their Lebanese comrades through a Christian Beirut suburb, killing 22 people. Israel, came into fighting on behalf of Christians in the hopes of pushing the PLO out of Lebanon and ensuring a friendly Maronite Christian regime in power. Israel directly supported the largest Maronite militia, the Phalange, providing arms, training, and funding, in coordination with the CIA. Israel also openly supported the leader of the Phalange movement for president, in the hopes that he would enter into a peace treaty. Why don’t you see the hands of MAIN enemies, you only hold the VICTIMS responsible.
And then, you hold Iran responsible for christian and Jewish criminality? These wars ALWAYS started by Israel and supported by the genocidal US hoping for BIGGER Israel at the expense of making other countries SMALLER, including Iran. Wake up or you will be wiped off the map.
Sorry but you're just making things up. Saddam Hussein started the Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988) because he saw the Iranian Revolution led by Ayatollah Khomeini as an ideological threat to his Iraqi Ba'ath version of pan-Arabism. Israel actually gave military support to Iran which suffered from US sanctions after the Iranian Revolution.
And then, you hold Iran responsible for christian and Jewish criminality? These wars ALWAYS started by Israel and supported by the genocidal US hoping for BIGGER Israel at the expense of making other countries SMALLER, including Iran. Wake up or you will be wiped off the map.
�
SOURCE:
IRAN-IRAQ WAR
The war between Iran and Iraq, lasting nearly eight years, commenced with the Iraqi invasion of Iran on 22 September 1980, and ended with the bilateral acceptance of the UN Security Council Resolution 598 on 20 July 1988. Considered by Iranians as “imposed war†(jang-e taḥmili), the Iran-Iraq War has been called “the longest conventional war of the 20th century,†and cost 1 million casualties and $1.19 trillion (Hiro, 1989, pp. 1-5).
On 22 September 1980, the simmering conflict between Iraq and Iran erupted into a full-scale war with the simultaneous Iraqi air-raids on ten Iranian civilian and military airports and the invasion of Iranian territory along the entire border between the two countries. Prior to the outbreak of the war, relations between the two countries deteriorated steadily in the aftermath of the 1979 Islamic revolution in Iran. This was due not only to personal hostility between Saddam Hussein of Iraq and Ayatollah Khomeini, but also, more importantly, due to the political ambitions of both states as well as ideological and territorial disputes. Ayatollah Khomeini, who had been living in exile in Iraq after 1963, was expelled from that country on 4 October 1978 at the request of the government of Mohammad Reza Shah following the outbreak of political disturbances in Iran.
On 28 September, six days after the Iraqi military invaded Iran, the UN Security Council called on both countries to refrain immediately from further use of force. Iraq declared its willingness to negotiate, but only if and when Iran accepted the Iraqi demands articulated by the Iraqi deputy prime minister, Tariq Aziz (Masserat, p. 55). These included a mutual guarantee of non-intervention in the affairs of the other country; an Iranian undertaking to cease all acts of “aggression†toward Iraq; Iran’s recognition of Iraqi sovereignty over all territories and waterways it claimed, including the Shatt al-Arab/Arvand Rud waterway.
THE CAUSES OF THE WAR
The pretext for the Iraqi invasion of Iran. Iraq claimed it was engaged in a defensive war and was “obliged to exercise its legitimate right to self-defense of sovereignty and territorial integrity and to recover its territories by force, considering that the Iranian Government had barred the way to all legally recognized ways to resolve the issues emanating from its obligations†(Dekker and Post, p. 84). Before the invasion, Iraq frequently had accused Iran of acts of aggression against Iraq and of interfering in Iraq’s internal affairs, such as supporting the banned al-DaÊ¿wa Party (Menashri, p. 157). In Arabic-language radio broadcasts Iranian leaders vehemently vilified the Ba’th regime as anti-Islamic and a puppet of imperialist powers. The regime in Baghdad also was accused of acts of aggression against Iran by publicly supporting separatist insurgents in Khuzestan, promising them assistance in liberating ‘Arabestan,’ the name adopted by the Iraqi regime for the old Persian province. According to the governor-general of Khuzestan, Admiral Aḥmad Madani, Iraq was supplying arms to the rebels (Keesings, 1980, p. 609). On several occasions, Iraq even had carried out attacks on Iranian border towns, for instance on Kurdish towns in north-western Iran in June 1979 and the following month on á¹¢ÄleḥÄbÄd in the south, where several people were killed. During the first half of 1980 additional border clashes occurred.
The Iraqi claim of sovereignty over all contested territories and waterways revived the old territorial dispute between the two countries (Dessouki, p. 2). The most contentious territorial disagreement was over the Shatt al-Arab and other waterways. In addition, three small islands in the Persian Gulf were also part of Hussein’s unsubstantiated territorial claims. The islands of Abu MusÄ and Greater and Lesser Tonbs (qq.v. at iranica.com), far from the Iraqi border, are close to the Strait of Hormuz and of great strategic importance. Until the late 19th and early 20th century, when the British occupied a number of Iranian islands and administered them through Arab sheikhs, as British protectorates, these islands had been parts of Iranian territory. The Iranian Abu MusÄ was administered on behalf of Great Britain by the sheikh of Sharjah and the two other islands by Raʾs al-Khaymah, both of these sheikhdoms later joining the United Arab Emirates. Iran had recaptured the islands on 30 November 1971, a few days before the United Arab Emirates came into existence following its independence from Britain. Iran quickly recognized the newly-created emirate. In September 1980, Iraq made an unfounded and provocative claim to sovereignty over the three islands on behalf of the “Arab nation,†demanding Iranian recognition of Iraq’s “legitimate†rights (Balta, p. 102).
The boundary disputes. The main dispute revolved around the demarcation of the boundary in the Shatt al-Arab waterway and the Iraqi claim to the Iranian province of Khuzestan. According to the pan-Arab ideology of the Ba’th party, Khuzestan belonged to the Arab nation and should return to Arab hands (Pipes, p. 23). The most important bone of contention, however, was over the Shatt al-Arab waterway, which is formed by the confluence of the Tigris, Euphrates, and KÄrun rivers (Grummon, p. 3). The final 55 miles of the 130-mile Shatt al-Arab waterway form the frontier between Iraq and Iran. The Shatt al-Arab is of economic and strategic importance to both countries. Basra, the only Iraqi port with an outlet to the Persian Gulf, lies 47 miles upstream, and large oil installations in both countries are located near the Shatt al-Arab (for a historical sketch of the disputes, see v and vi, above; see also PÄrsÄdust, 1990a).
After the dissolution of the Ottoman empire, with Iraq first becoming a British mandate in 1920 and then an independent state in 1932, Iran repudiated the demarcation line established in the Constantinople Protocol of November 1913 (see vi, above). Iran wanted the border to run along the thalweg, the deepest point of the navigable channel, maintaining that the Constantinople Protocol had been the legacy of colonial rule. Iraq, encouraged and supported by Britain, took Iran to the League of Nations in 1934, but no settlement was reached. Negotiations between the two countries continued, and in 1937 Iran and Iraq signed their first boundary treaty. Among other things, the treaty established the waterway border on the eastern bank of the river except for a four-mile anchorage zone near Ä€bÄdÄn, which was allotted to Iran and where the border ran along the thalweg. Years later, Iraq accused Iran of taking advantage of Iraq’s weak negotiating position at a time when Iraq was beset by internal political turmoil following the military coup of November 1936 by Nuri al-Said (Abdulghani, p. 116).
For three decades no important developments in the dispute occurred. But in the 1960s, when Iran had become a strong regional power and Iraq was weakened by several coups, Iran again took advantage of Iraq’s political vulnerability. First, it sent a delegation to Iraq soon after the Ba’th coup in 1969 and, when Iraq refused to proceed with negotiations over a new treaty, Iran abrogated the treaty of 1937. Then, it further pressured Iraq by supporting the Kurdish rebels in the north. Iraq was obliged to give in to Iranian demands concerning the Shatt al-Arab, in exchange for an Iranian promise to end its support of Kurdish rebels (Ismael, p. 20). This resulted in the Algiers Protocol of 1975, in which the thalweg was for the first time recognized as the border between the two countries along the entire length of the Shatt al-Arab. But five years later, on 17 September 1980, Iraq suddenly abrogated the Algiers Protocol following the Iranian revolution. In his speech to the National Assembly, Saddam Hussein claimed that the Islamic Republic of Iran refused to abide by the stipulations of the Algiers Protocol and, therefore, Iraq considered the Protocol null and void. Furthermore, Hussein declared in the same speech that the entire Shatt al-Arab had been Iraqi-Arab throughout history and that Iraqi authority over the Shatt al-Arab should be restored. Five days later, the Iraqi army crossed the border (see PÄrsÄdust, 1990b; Anvari Tehrani, 1993).
Iraq’s objectives in invading Iran. There were several factors which jointly or independently appear to have influenced the Iraqi regime’s decision to initiate a war. These factors can be divided into aims and motives: Saddam Hussein’s ambition for political and economic hegemony in the Persian Gulf; achieving control of the entire Shatt al-Arab waterway and capturing territories claimed by Iraq; strengthening Iraqi security and counteracting the effect of Iran’s Islamic revolution on the large Iraqi Shiʿite population. The post-revolutionary political turmoil in Iran, the collapse of Iranian armed forces, as well as the encouragement by the elites of the Iranian ancien regime in exile, evidently were perceived by Iraqi leaders as circumstances offering an ideal opportunity to wage war.
The ideology of the Islamic Republic of Iran, and especially the attempt to export the Islamic revolution to other Muslim countries, was seen by Iraqi leaders as a threat to the secular ideology of their Ba’th party and as a danger to the stability of the country. Iranian propaganda, aimed at Iraq’s disaffected population, focused on the un-Islamic character of the secular Ba’th ideology and was intended to incite Iraqis to revolt and topple the regime of Saddam Hussein (Maddy-Weitzmann, p. 181).
�
The sooner the Arab/Muslim population of Europe reaches the 51% mark the better. May they soon take over every European government and enslave the despicable, craven whites.
White Europeans are like caged animals that the zoomaster has decided to starve to death
�
This isn’t 4chan faggot, have your “goon session” on discord where it belongs.
Just like all the Jews left the West when Israel was created?
I have some thoughts about that question. After I read that Jared Kushner was going to have the final say on who did or did not get hired by the new Orange Man’s administration, my initial sense was that, at a minimum, the whopping and outrageous 80% infestation in the Biden White House would surely be maintained and would probably be even further increased.
Hence, I have been laser beam focused on every new name that the Orange Man says he plans to choose for his cabinet or for a top spot in his administration. As Striker mentions, there are a tiny number of jews chosen so far – which is opposite of what I have expected.
This unexpected development suddenly switched on the Danger, Danger, Will Robinson sensor bulb that hovers directly over my red pilled on the JQ head.
Here is what I sense is happening. The big jews have been reading websites like Unz.com and countless others in the pro-MAGA, pro-America First, anti-war, anti-interventionist online community and they are watching the exploding number of podcasters – both on youtube and on Rumble, Bitchute and Odysee – and these podcasts are screaming loudly and profusely over the massive and visible jewish infestation of the Biden Administration and they are connecting all of these virulently anti-White policies and lawfare against the Orange Man and especially the deliberate turd world invasion to the White race hating jews like Garland and Mayorkas.
This ‘noticing’ is making the big and little jews very nervous – because they KNOW that the agenda they are going to try to force America into over the next four years is going to drastically increase the noticing and radioactive anger at jews who would be seen pushing the agenda. So, I think the big jews like Miriam Adelson and her ilk decided that it would be much safer for them to retreat back behind the curtain and reduce their visibility. I think they told the Orange Con Man to hire White gentiles for most of his cabinet picks, but just make sure these White rats were hard core, war mongering, Israel First America Never psychopaths.
This way, when the jews who are pulling these White psychopath’s strings and order them to push the agenda of the jews – their White faces will receive the blame and the backlash, instead of the jews whose agenda they are advancing.
This is not a ‘new’ tactic that the jews just recently came up with. They have used this same kind of strategy for thousands of years and it is used to insulate them from blow back from the non-jews who eventually get fed up with their evil machinations.
It is moral insanity to hate a good and decent human being just because they are Jewish.
There is no such thing as a “Jew” anymore. Moses invented Judaism. Moses killed Hebroids in order to eventually deliver the Messiah. The Prophets followed his vision. When Jesus Christ appeared, the last of the “Jews” were slipping away into Satanism. Christ became alienated from his own family. Christ became targeted by what was now a Satanic nation. It dawned upon Christ what his fate would be, and he went out with his head held high like a king, knowing of his own return. He eventually became the spiritual King of Western Civilization, the closest in history to uniting heaven and earth per Christ’s prophesy in the Lord’s Prayer. The “Jews” went into full blown Satanism, and have been inciting against Christendom ever since. Splinters of Hebroids were devastated about what they and their nation did to the Christ, wracked with guilt. They got the ball rolling in what would become the total annihilation of “Israel” (the Satanic state).
Mind you, being good and decent and human makes being a ‘Jew’ more an act of habit rather than conviction.
“Good and decent” should never be conflated with the Synagogue of Satan under any conditions. It’s the opening they’re looking for to despoil the good and the decent. As Satanists, they’re out for the blood of Moses and the blood of Christ, non-stop.
God’s Kingdom come, God’s will be done, On Earth as it is in Heaven, needs to be wringing through the stiff-necked Satanist’s ears, just as it was when Moses dropped the blade the first time.
I find this definition somewhat confusing, outdated and incorrect. No one has ever seen or talked to Satan, so it is safe to assume that he is the product of an altered state of consciousness in medieval scribes caused by the consumption of Amanita muscaria. So Satan is a fiction. On the other hand, the dogmas of the Talmud and the Old Testament are allowed to undermine our way of life, our morals, our very prospects of survival. That is why we should concentrate our efforts on exposing the evils emanating from Talmudist and Chabadist congregations (synagogues and similar places).Replies: @Belis60
Synagogue of Satan
�
Stop repeating the propaganda lies of the evil west and its mad dog, Israel. Iran cannot impose its 'religious belief' on its own citizens, why should they impose it on others? This is a big lie by the evil
[Iranians do NOT have the right to impose their religious beliefs onto non-Iranians...]
�
Iranian women are modern and educated, but they don't believe working in a sex 'gentlemen's club' is part of being a 'modern woman'. It happens only in a country with no Moral values, and thus everything is accepted, including genocide of children and toddlers, because is good for 'business'. You have no civilization when you are led by the mafia pimps and whores. We don't need your life style pushed by bombs on others, and Iran never imposed its moral values on anyone including those who were working in a sex gentlemen's club to give sexual services before marrying a zionist mobster and now are going to lead a nation with NO moral values, a symbol of American Modern women's life style.
Nor I am advocating that Iranian women adopt modern lifestyles which conflict with the religious beliefs of Shiite Muslims
�
Israel invaded Lebanon before Hizbollah was created. Hizbollah fought to force the enemy of Lebanan, Israel, out of the country by sacrificing their own lives. In fact, Hizbollah came into being due to Israel invasion of Lebanon and Iran had nothing to do with it.
You’re right that Hezbollah was founded in 1982 right after Israel invaded Southern Lebanon in response to attacks from the PLO which was based there. But you’re wrong when you claim that Iran had nothing to do with Hezbollah which not only fought against IDF forces in Southern Lebanon but also participated in the Lebanese Civil War with military support from Iran. That Civil War devastated Lebanon by pitting Christians vs Muslims which forced the mass emigration of Lebanese Christians fleeing their country now balkanized along sectarian lines. After the expulsion of the PLO from Lebanon, Israel withdrew all of its IDF forces in 2000, ending its two-decade long military occupation there. Thereafter, the UN Security Council passed its Resolution 1701 which mandated the disarmanent of all militias including the Hezbollah and its transfer to north of the Litani River in order to allow UN peacekeeping forces to maintain peace and order in Southern Lebanon.
As Shiite Muslims, the Hezbollah originally sought to establish its own Islamic State modeled after the Iranian Theocracy. But the Hezbollah gave up on their plan after the Taif Agreement reached in 1989 ended the Lebanese Civil War and established the Lebanese multi-religious political system based on equal sectarian representation amongst Maronite Christians, Shiite Muslims, Sunni Muslims, Orthodox Christians and Druze Lebanese. The problem is that the Hezbollah has so far refused to disarm after all the other Lebanese armed groups who participated in the Civil War had done so. That was true even after the foreign forces from Israel and Syria had already left Lebanon as well.
Are you a christian Lebanese? why don't you acknowedge that the creation of Israel has caused these wars because the goal of 'Israel Project' in Palestine by the West is to capture the region and its resources to be used against west perceived enemy like Iran, china and Russia. Israel is the MAD DOG of the west and unless is not DESTROYED, we continue having wars and genocide. The Christians in Lebanon, always played another SERVANT of Israel against the interest of majority Muslims. They have to stop giving services to the enemy of humanity US, ISRAE, FRANCE even Germany.The criminal West, Arab head of states, and Russia, forced a war, through Saddam, on Iran where the country was fully engaged in defending its borders until 1988, so Iran did not have anything to do with the Lebanese civil war. Iran didn't have arms to defend herself, thus, one million of its own youth were killed or injured by the western weapon transfer to Iraq, including Russia, and use of chemical weapons where the CRIMINAL west provided to Saddam.
But you’re wrong when you claim that Iran had nothing to do with Hezbollah which not only fought against IDF forces in Southern Lebanon but also participated in the Lebanese Civil War with military support from Iran.
�
Israel took more direct role three years into the war: In March 1978, it invaded Lebanon. By the time Israeli forces withdrew later that month, more than 2,000 Lebanese and Palestinians had been killed, 200,000 displaced, and dozens of villages in the south damaged. Before the invasion, combined left-wing Lebanese and Palestinian forces had made important gains. Israel’s attack, however, strengthened its relationship with the Maronite forces, which would continue through a second Israeli invasion in 1982. So, it was not Hizbollah alone, but the Lebanese left, refugees who were defending Lebanon against evil, but the Christian elite were playing BALLS with Israel/US against the people of Lebanon. The war finally ended in 1990, following the Taif agreement, which altered the balance of power within Lebanon’s government. But that resolution failed to address the war’s root causes, perpetuating the sectarian dynamics that still plague Lebanese society. Due to western control, Lebanon has been divided into three sects the Christians, Sunni, and Shiite, in order to continue the occupation of Lebanon by the west and its MAD DOG, Israel. The criminal West has forced the same divisive system in occupied Iraq. Divide and conquer, is the game.
After the expulsion of the PLO from Lebanon, Israel withdrew all of its IDF forces in 2000, ... , the UN Security Council passed its Resolution 1701 which mandated the disarmanent of all militias including the Hezbollah and its transfer to north of the Litani River in ....
�
Wrong. (blondes, gingers with pink ones only, no fatties, no fems, no one under 60, “little ones” are OK). I say, just in case yer old lady refuses to put your peehole in her mouth – not uncommon, btw. But this ain’t the place to discuss that.
Way less illiterate than you I’d venture a bet.
Argentina? Last I looked, that ain’t anywhere near Aferca.
Hitler came quite a bit later in the process. Guess you were out of class that day.
[Iranians do NOT have the right to impose their religious beliefs onto non-Iranians…]
Stop repeating the propaganda lies of the evil west and its mad dog, Israel. Iran cannot impose its ‘religious belief’ on its own citizens, why should they impose it on others? This is a big lie by the evil
West to paint Iranian government as not ‘modern’.
Nor I am advocating that Iranian women adopt modern lifestyles which conflict with the religious beliefs of Shiite Muslims
Iranian women are modern and educated, but they don’t believe working in a sex ‘gentlemen’s club’ is part of being a ‘modern woman’. It happens only in a country with no Moral values, and thus everything is accepted, including genocide of children and toddlers, because is good for ‘business’. You have no civilization when you are led by the mafia pimps and whores. We don’t need your life style pushed by bombs on others, and Iran never imposed its moral values on anyone including those who were working in a sex gentlemen’s club to give sexual services before marrying a zionist mobster and now are going to lead a nation with NO moral values, a symbol of American Modern women’s life style.
Israel invaded Lebanon before Hizbollah was created. Hizbollah fought to force the enemy of Lebanan, Israel, out of the country by sacrificing their own lives. In fact, Hizbollah came into being due to Israel invasion of Lebanon and Iran had nothing to do with it. Read the history correctly.
The Iranian women never accept a whore life style to be considered a ‘modern women’. This can be accepted only in a uncivilized entity where has NO moral values. You should be concerned how LOW you have sunk.
You're right that Hezbollah was founded in 1982 right after Israel invaded Southern Lebanon in response to attacks from the PLO which was based there. But you're wrong when you claim that Iran had nothing to do with Hezbollah which not only fought against IDF forces in Southern Lebanon but also participated in the Lebanese Civil War with military support from Iran. That Civil War devastated Lebanon by pitting Christians vs Muslims which forced the mass emigration of Lebanese Christians fleeing their country now balkanized along sectarian lines. After the expulsion of the PLO from Lebanon, Israel withdrew all of its IDF forces in 2000, ending its two-decade long military occupation there. Thereafter, the UN Security Council passed its Resolution 1701 which mandated the disarmanent of all militias including the Hezbollah and its transfer to north of the Litani River in order to allow UN peacekeeping forces to maintain peace and order in Southern Lebanon.
Israel invaded Lebanon before Hizbollah was created. Hizbollah fought to force the enemy of Lebanan, Israel, out of the country by sacrificing their own lives. In fact, Hizbollah came into being due to Israel invasion of Lebanon and Iran had nothing to do with it.
�
Yes, it is good for business to have pimp and whore to represent an uncivilized nation.
On August 20, 2016, an article was published in the Daily Mail newspaper titled 'Racy photos, and troubling questions about his wife's past. Among other things, the article noted that allegations have been made in a book available on Amazon about a modeling agency where Mrs. Trump worked in Milan being 'something like a gentleman's club,' and an article published by Suzy, a Slovenian magazine, alleged that Mrs. Trump's modeling agency in New York, run by Paolo Zampolli, 'operated as an escort agency for wealthy clients.'
�
I am not passing moral judgement on the treatment of women in Iran but merely making a statement of fact about the reality of life for women living in a Theocratic State such as Iran. Nor I am advocating that Iranian women adopt modern lifestyles which conflict with the religious beliefs of Shiite Muslims. Quite the contrary, I believe strongly that Iranians have the right to do as they please within Iran as it is their country. But outside Iran? Iranians do NOT have the right to impose their religious beliefs onto non-Iranians, eg., the Lebanese citizens of Lebanon which is a Sovereign State officially recognized by the UN.
Stop repeating the propaganda lies of the evil west and its mad dog, Israel. Iran cannot impose its 'religious belief' on its own citizens, why should they impose it on others? This is a big lie by the evil
[Iranians do NOT have the right to impose their religious beliefs onto non-Iranians...]
�
Iranian women are modern and educated, but they don't believe working in a sex 'gentlemen's club' is part of being a 'modern woman'. It happens only in a country with no Moral values, and thus everything is accepted, including genocide of children and toddlers, because is good for 'business'. You have no civilization when you are led by the mafia pimps and whores. We don't need your life style pushed by bombs on others, and Iran never imposed its moral values on anyone including those who were working in a sex gentlemen's club to give sexual services before marrying a zionist mobster and now are going to lead a nation with NO moral values, a symbol of American Modern women's life style.
Nor I am advocating that Iranian women adopt modern lifestyles which conflict with the religious beliefs of Shiite Muslims
�
You are gullible to the bone. To wear a bikini or not is NOT sign of CIVILIZATION, although the Iranian women wear Bikini when they go to the swimming pool or at their private pools. They don’t wear Bikini in public. I don’t think American women wearing Bikini in public either, although they have been seen in ‘shorts’ and ‘tops’ in the street that is more revealing than Bikini. ‘It is good for business’, and has nothing to do with your FAKE ‘freedom’ which is pack of LIES. However, the charactor of your ‘representatives’ are sign of Civilization where you DON’T have, when your ‘president’ is a zionist pimp married to a whore because is ‘good for business’.
But, the civilized Iranian people do care, that their representatives cares about moral issues. Their representatives are not child killers, whores, pimps or child fuckers.
On August 20, 2016, an article was published in the Daily Mail newspaper titled ‘Racy photos, and troubling questions about his wife’s past. Among other things, the article noted that allegations have been made in a book available on Amazon about a modeling agency where Mrs. Trump worked in Milan being ‘something like a gentleman’s club,’ and an article published by Suzy, a Slovenian magazine, alleged that Mrs. Trump’s modeling agency in New York, run by Paolo Zampolli, ‘operated as an escort agency for wealthy clients.’
Yes, it is good for business to have pimp and whore to represent an uncivilized nation.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/fact-check-melania-trumps-nude-190000869.html
“You’re even more confused than I thought. If you want to know what Islamic Theocracies are like, try wearing a bikini in in Iran.”
You are even dumber than I thought, which is saying something.
Why would I BE in Iran, let alone wear a bikini there? It’s not my country, it is THEIRS.
If visiting there why would I want to offend their morality and traditions by exhibiting myself like that? I am not an Israeli Jew to insist on making myself odious through my behavior as a tourist.
Try being a Muslim of Christian Palestinian in their OWN occupied Palestine, now a judaic theocracy. Need details, hasbara muncher?
So, Israel IS a judaic theocracy, you don’t dispute that, you just kick sand with your hind legs about Iran.
You’re even more confused than I thought. If you want to know what Islamic Theocracies are like, try wearing a bikini in in Iran.
Yes, it is good for business to have pimp and whore to represent an uncivilized nation.
On August 20, 2016, an article was published in the Daily Mail newspaper titled 'Racy photos, and troubling questions about his wife's past. Among other things, the article noted that allegations have been made in a book available on Amazon about a modeling agency where Mrs. Trump worked in Milan being 'something like a gentleman's club,' and an article published by Suzy, a Slovenian magazine, alleged that Mrs. Trump's modeling agency in New York, run by Paolo Zampolli, 'operated as an escort agency for wealthy clients.'
�
https://pixel.nymag.com/imgs/daily/intelligencer/2015/03/03/bibi-gifs/bibi-claps.nocrop.w536.h2147483647.giffinally, someone who 'gets it'.Bibi is our slave.He is sacrificing everything in service to America.He doesn't want to bomb Gaza and Lebanon and Syria and Iran. Of course not.He only wants peace!But America won't allow him or the Jews to have peace!Just like America won't leave the Third World alone, and demands that they all come here. Ripping families apart as the young men are forced to leave to make a new life for themselves on the American welfare system. It's beyond cruel and inhumane, but what do you expect from America?I'm tired of all these people saying 'Jew this and Jew that'. Haven't the Jews been persecuted enough?!America used them to foment two disastrous World Wars, that targeted the Jews for a "Holocaust"!Then America did a false flag on itself on 9/11, because it wanted to use Israel as a pretext for endless wars in the Middle East, to steal oil, and murder Muslims, because what we all know, is America is nothing if not racist!And the terrible irony, is that racist America, [redundant] is now again exploiting Jews in order to murder Palestinian children, because America just loves to kill brown people, because of their racism. Just like America is imposing this war in Ukraine, and cynically using a Jew as the figurehead, so they can kill and maim, because that's all Americans care about. Killing and maiming and stealing other people's land, like the West Bank and the Golan Heights. And now the Americans want to bomb Iran! Even as the Jews are begging them not to!Is there no limit to America's rapine? Is there no limit to their racism?How many Jews are going to have to die, before America sends it's service men and women into Gaza and Lebanon? How many Jews are going to have to die, before America is willing to bomb Iran?Already there are pogroms again in Europe. Already there is a replay of Kristallnacht, how far away is yet another "Holocaust" America?! Are you blind?!And now wars on Afghanistan and wars on Iraq and Libya and Syria! All so America could kill brown people, and blame it on the Jews! Like always!Sorry to froth like that Joe Wong, but your comment really hit a nerve.I'm tired of America and Americans demanding all these wars and immigration and wokeness and genocide in Gaza, and then blaming it all on innocent Jews!
Blaming Zionists for America’s wrong-doings is simply irresponsible, unethical, and wicked.In Jew’s eyes, they are paying a very high price for doing American’s dirty work.
�
Congrats, Rurik!
One of the best (if not the best) satire I’ve ever seen on UR.
Fine. Provided you use the term “Supremacist Jewish Theocracy†for Israel.Israel is not run by Jewish Theocrats but by Israeli Zionists. My proof: the ultra-Orthodox Jews -- who are called haredim in Israel -- refuse to serve in the IDF for religious reasons. It's quite easy to spot the haredim because they wear all-Black attire which came from Europe. The bulk of the IDF are mizrahim who are the foot soldiers doing the mass killings in Gaza. The mizrahim also comprise the power base of Netanyahu's right-wing Likud Party. It's easy to tell who's mizrahim because they look and speak Arabic as they are native to West Asia.
�
By the same token the US had no business getting involved in the Arab-Israeli Conflict on Israel\’s side because Jews are only 2% of the US majority Christian population, a religious group that Israeli Jews have systematically killed kicked out from occupied Palestine.Contrary to the Alt-Right Conspiracy Theory alleging Zionist control of US Foreign Policy towards the Middle East, the USA was at best indifferent to or at worst hostile to the Zionist cause at the onset of the Arab-Israeli Conflict which was triggered by the founding of the State of Israel. At the height of the Suez Canal Crisis when the British and the French conspired with the Israelis to invade Egypt and seize the Suez Canal which was nationalized by the pan-Arabist nationalist Nasser, the USA under Eisenhower sided with Egypt under Nasser due to the geopolitical exigencies of the Cold War. The USA didn't get involved in the Arab-Israeli Conflict until Nixon intervened on the side of the Israelis as a reaction to Soviet backing of the Arabs. The Arabs reacted to the US intervention by imposing an oil embargo which forced Kissinger to negotiate the Petrodollar System with the Saudis whereby Arab oil gets sold in USD (and only in USD) in exchange for US military protection.
�
No.why should they? It is THEIR country. Did the Israeli withdraw from any occupied Palestinian land (not their land) despite numerous UN resolutions asking for it?Palestine is not Lebanon.Hezbollah is not, has never been and will never be a Sovereign State unlike Lebanon which is a Sovereign State recognized by the UN. No Sovereign State such as Lebanon would allow a Foreign Power such as Iran to support and arm a militia such as the Hezbollah within its borders because that would violate its national sovereignty. Israel also violated the national sovereignty of Lebanon when the IDF invaded Southern Lebanon. That's why UN Resolution 1701 called for the withdrawal of the IDF from Southern Lebanon as well as disarming the Hezbollah and their relocation to North of the Litani River. As Israel couldn't defeat the Hezbollah, it complied with UN Resolution 1701 by withdrawing the IDF from Southern Lebanon.
�
No, why shouldn’t they? Didn’t the US continue to supply Israel with bomb to kill Palestinians en masse?And Lebanon is not Palestine.
�
Please don’t give us any more of your ‘Evil Muslims’ crap in support of genocide, land theft and crimes against humanity.I am continually amazed at the naivete of Westerners like yourself. The bloody mess that is the Muddle East today is the denouement of the power grab between four parties -- Israeli Zionists, Pan-Arab Nationalists, Saudi Wahhabists and Iranian Theocrats -- who have brought in outside parties in the past until the present -- British, French, Americans, Soviets and Russians -- to intervene for and on their behalf. The geopolitics of the Muddle East is a sad story but it is not a morality play of 'good' vs 'evil'. Instead, it is more akin to a tragic contest as to who gets to kill the most or risk getting killed in a perpetual game of death which sees no end in sight to the depths of depravity and the cycles of violence permeating that whole region of the Muddle East.Replies: @ariadna
�
You get off to a bad start:
“Israel is not run by Jewish Theocrats but by Israeli Zionists. My proof: the ultra-Orthodox Jews — who are called haredim in Israel — refuse to serve in the IDF for religious reasons.â€
Israel IS a judaic theocracy, which is clear to anyone who knows the meaning of the word, even if that either escapes you or you lie. The dovetailing of purpose between zionists and religious fanatics shows that it is a marriage made in hell.
Your “proof†is an idiotic self goal: only a theocracy would absolve self-declared religious nuts from important civic duties.
There are real and obvious proofs, like for example:
— Israel is not the state of its citizens, residents in that state, but of Jews in Israel and anywhere else in the world who present rabbinically accepted mitochondrial proof of matrilinear “jewishness.â€
— Divorce in Israel is fully valid only if the wife obtains a rabbi’s “git†(permission) to divorce.
— The offspring of a mixed marriage between a Jew and a non-Jew is considered a “mamzer†(bastard) and is barred from state employment.
—Displays of Christmas trees/ornaments in a Palestinian Christian eatery is reason to withdraw its permission to function.
After that dismal start you only skid further down, too absurdly false to further waste time on.
Sorry, you are right.
I think you meant to direct your comment to <b 'antibeast', NOT me.
I didn’t say these words.
Beirut used to be the Paris of the Middle East during the time when Lebanon had a Christian majority.
This TITLE, thee Paris of the M.E, was given to Abadan, a southern region in Iran during the EVIL British occupation of province of Khuzistan, Iran. Abadan was described as ‘Paris of the Middle East’ when EVIL British thieves living in Abadan and the Iranian educated class had to serve their interests before they were kicked out of Iran like rotten rats.
The same is true about Lebanon, when the Christian elite was serving the interests of evil US empire and French evil empire against Muslims interests.
I guess, Algeria, was also the ‘Paris of the M.E’, when evil French faggots occupied the land of Algerians and massacring them to keep their occupation of Algeria, to rob their resources to help the ‘French working class’ back home, according to the fucking French socialists who refused to leave Algeria when they were in power.
All the Western occupiers spread these lies, since the occupiers had a rich life when they were residing on other people’s territory robbing them. They felt they are living in ‘Paris’, when they were killing the indigenous population every single day to continue their life style and help their working class at home. This method used by the evil western empire to improve the condition of living at home by stealing from others. Americas, Canada, Australia were stolen by an act of genocide, like in Israel, by the evil Western empires. These are good example of West evil empires.
The people of the region are ordering the evil west to fuck off from our region and take their MAD DOG with them. Israel should be erected in those western countries who are supporting the genocide of the indigenous population. Lebanon VOTED NO for the erection of Israel in occupied Palestine, so Iran, so every single countries in the region. Israel cannot exist in a region that NO one wants her to be. fuck off.
At one time Lebanon KEPT christian to serve the West. But, Shiites are not the minority in Lebanon anymore.
Israel must be erected on America, Canada, Russia, Britain, Germany or fucking France.
Fine. Provided you use the term “Supremacist Jewish Theocracy†for Israel.
Israel is not run by Jewish Theocrats but by Israeli Zionists. My proof: the ultra-Orthodox Jews — who are called haredim in Israel — refuse to serve in the IDF for religious reasons. It’s quite easy to spot the haredim because they wear all-Black attire which came from Europe. The bulk of the IDF are mizrahim who are the foot soldiers doing the mass killings in Gaza. The mizrahim also comprise the power base of Netanyahu’s right-wing Likud Party. It’s easy to tell who’s mizrahim because they look and speak Arabic as they are native to West Asia.
By the same token the US had no business getting involved in the Arab-Israeli Conflict on Israel\’s side because Jews are only 2% of the US majority Christian population, a religious group that Israeli Jews have systematically killed kicked out from occupied Palestine.
Contrary to the Alt-Right Conspiracy Theory alleging Zionist control of US Foreign Policy towards the Middle East, the USA was at best indifferent to or at worst hostile to the Zionist cause at the onset of the Arab-Israeli Conflict which was triggered by the founding of the State of Israel. At the height of the Suez Canal Crisis when the British and the French conspired with the Israelis to invade Egypt and seize the Suez Canal which was nationalized by the pan-Arabist nationalist Nasser, the USA under Eisenhower sided with Egypt under Nasser due to the geopolitical exigencies of the Cold War. The USA didn’t get involved in the Arab-Israeli Conflict until Nixon intervened on the side of the Israelis as a reaction to Soviet backing of the Arabs. The Arabs reacted to the US intervention by imposing an oil embargo which forced Kissinger to negotiate the Petrodollar System with the Saudis whereby Arab oil gets sold in USD (and only in USD) in exchange for US military protection.
No.why should they? It is THEIR country. Did the Israeli withdraw from any occupied Palestinian land (not their land) despite numerous UN resolutions asking for it?
Palestine is not Lebanon.
Hezbollah is not, has never been and will never be a Sovereign State unlike Lebanon which is a Sovereign State recognized by the UN. No Sovereign State such as Lebanon would allow a Foreign Power such as Iran to support and arm a militia such as the Hezbollah within its borders because that would violate its national sovereignty. Israel also violated the national sovereignty of Lebanon when the IDF invaded Southern Lebanon. That’s why UN Resolution 1701 called for the withdrawal of the IDF from Southern Lebanon as well as disarming the Hezbollah and their relocation to North of the Litani River. As Israel couldn’t defeat the Hezbollah, it complied with UN Resolution 1701 by withdrawing the IDF from Southern Lebanon.
No, why shouldn’t they? Didn’t the US continue to supply Israel with bomb to kill Palestinians en masse?
And Lebanon is not Palestine.
Please don’t give us any more of your ‘Evil Muslims’ crap in support of genocide, land theft and crimes against humanity.
I am continually amazed at the naivete of Westerners like yourself. The bloody mess that is the Muddle East today is the denouement of the power grab between four parties — Israeli Zionists, Pan-Arab Nationalists, Saudi Wahhabists and Iranian Theocrats — who have brought in outside parties in the past until the present — British, French, Americans, Soviets and Russians — to intervene for and on their behalf. The geopolitics of the Muddle East is a sad story but it is not a morality play of ‘good’ vs ‘evil’. Instead, it is more akin to a tragic contest as to who gets to kill the most or risk getting killed in a perpetual game of death which sees no end in sight to the depths of depravity and the cycles of violence permeating that whole region of the Muddle East.
Then came the Iranian Mullahs who wanted to pick a fight with the Israeli Zionists by sacrificing their own national interests for what? To save Palestinian Arabs?And this was your reply:
�
First, STOP using ‘mullahs’ which is insulting to Iranian people. These people have chosen their own dress code and do not like to wear Western clothing.Let me use the term 'Iranian Theocrats' in lieu of 'Iranian Mullahs'. Since you simply evaded my question, here's my answer to my own question:
�
Since when are the Persians involved in the Arab-Israeli Conflict which was never about religion — Islam vs Judaism — but about ideology — pan-Arabic Nationalism vs Israeli Zionism.Shah's Iran had no business getting involved in the Arab-Israeli Conflict because Iranians are mostly Persians not Arabs. After the fall of the Shah, the Iranian Theocrats then came along and got involved in the Arab-Israeli Conflict by supporting and arming the Hezbollah in response to the Israeli invasion of Southern Lebanon during its Civil War. But Israel eventually withdrew its military forces from Southern Lebanon as mandated by UN Resolution 1701 which also required the Hezbollah to disarm and relocate to north of the Litani River.My next question is:Did the Hezbollah disarm and relocate to north of the Litani River? Did Iran continue to support and arm the Hezbollah? Did Hezbollah and its IRGC backers comply with UN Resolution 1701?Please don't give me any more of the 'Evul Zionists' crap and just answer with a simple Yes or No.Replies: @Anon, @mulga mumblebrain, @ariadna
�
“Let me use the term ‘Iranian Theocrats’ in lieu of ‘Iranian Mullahs’.
Fine. Provided you use the term “Supremacist Jewish Theocracy†for Israel.
“Shah’s Iran had no business getting involved in the Arab-Israeli Conflict because Iranians are mostly Persians not Arabs.â€
By the same token the US had no business getting involved in the Arab-Israeli Conflict on Israel\’s side because Jews are only 2% of the US majority Christian population, a religious group that Israeli Jews have systematically killed kicked out from occupied Palestine.
“Did the Hezbollah disarm and relocate to north of the Litani River?
No.why should they? It is THEIR country. Did the Israeli withdraw from any occupied Palestinian land (not their land)despite numerous UN resolutions asking for it?
“Did Iran continue to support and arm the Hezbollah?
No, why shouldn’t they? Didn’t the US continue to supply Israel with bomb to kill Palesgtinians en masse?
Please don’t give me any more of the ‘Evul Zionists’ crap.
Please don’t give us any more of your ‘Evil Muslims’ crap in support of genocide, land theft and crimes against humanity.
Fine. Provided you use the term “Supremacist Jewish Theocracy†for Israel.Israel is not run by Jewish Theocrats but by Israeli Zionists. My proof: the ultra-Orthodox Jews -- who are called haredim in Israel -- refuse to serve in the IDF for religious reasons. It's quite easy to spot the haredim because they wear all-Black attire which came from Europe. The bulk of the IDF are mizrahim who are the foot soldiers doing the mass killings in Gaza. The mizrahim also comprise the power base of Netanyahu's right-wing Likud Party. It's easy to tell who's mizrahim because they look and speak Arabic as they are native to West Asia.
�
By the same token the US had no business getting involved in the Arab-Israeli Conflict on Israel\’s side because Jews are only 2% of the US majority Christian population, a religious group that Israeli Jews have systematically killed kicked out from occupied Palestine.Contrary to the Alt-Right Conspiracy Theory alleging Zionist control of US Foreign Policy towards the Middle East, the USA was at best indifferent to or at worst hostile to the Zionist cause at the onset of the Arab-Israeli Conflict which was triggered by the founding of the State of Israel. At the height of the Suez Canal Crisis when the British and the French conspired with the Israelis to invade Egypt and seize the Suez Canal which was nationalized by the pan-Arabist nationalist Nasser, the USA under Eisenhower sided with Egypt under Nasser due to the geopolitical exigencies of the Cold War. The USA didn't get involved in the Arab-Israeli Conflict until Nixon intervened on the side of the Israelis as a reaction to Soviet backing of the Arabs. The Arabs reacted to the US intervention by imposing an oil embargo which forced Kissinger to negotiate the Petrodollar System with the Saudis whereby Arab oil gets sold in USD (and only in USD) in exchange for US military protection.
�
No.why should they? It is THEIR country. Did the Israeli withdraw from any occupied Palestinian land (not their land) despite numerous UN resolutions asking for it?Palestine is not Lebanon.Hezbollah is not, has never been and will never be a Sovereign State unlike Lebanon which is a Sovereign State recognized by the UN. No Sovereign State such as Lebanon would allow a Foreign Power such as Iran to support and arm a militia such as the Hezbollah within its borders because that would violate its national sovereignty. Israel also violated the national sovereignty of Lebanon when the IDF invaded Southern Lebanon. That's why UN Resolution 1701 called for the withdrawal of the IDF from Southern Lebanon as well as disarming the Hezbollah and their relocation to North of the Litani River. As Israel couldn't defeat the Hezbollah, it complied with UN Resolution 1701 by withdrawing the IDF from Southern Lebanon.
�
No, why shouldn’t they? Didn’t the US continue to supply Israel with bomb to kill Palestinians en masse?And Lebanon is not Palestine.
�
Please don’t give us any more of your ‘Evil Muslims’ crap in support of genocide, land theft and crimes against humanity.I am continually amazed at the naivete of Westerners like yourself. The bloody mess that is the Muddle East today is the denouement of the power grab between four parties -- Israeli Zionists, Pan-Arab Nationalists, Saudi Wahhabists and Iranian Theocrats -- who have brought in outside parties in the past until the present -- British, French, Americans, Soviets and Russians -- to intervene for and on their behalf. The geopolitics of the Muddle East is a sad story but it is not a morality play of 'good' vs 'evil'. Instead, it is more akin to a tragic contest as to who gets to kill the most or risk getting killed in a perpetual game of death which sees no end in sight to the depths of depravity and the cycles of violence permeating that whole region of the Muddle East.Replies: @ariadna
�
Did you know that there more Lebanese living outside than inside Lebanon because millions of Lebanese (mostly Christians) fled the Lebanese Civil War? And did you know that the Muslims became the majority population in Lebanon because of the influx of Palestinian refugees who were rejected by or evicted from Muslim Arab countries such as Egypt, Jordan, Syria, etc.
Beirut used to be the Paris of the Middle East during the time when Lebanon had a Christian majority. Now that the Muslim majority has taken over, Lebanon has been turned into yet another hellhole in the Muddle East. Those stupid Arabs can’t help themselves but turn everything they touch into a bloody mess.
Then came the Iranian Mullahs who wanted to pick a fight with the Israeli Zionists by sacrificing their own national interests for what? To save Palestinian Arabs?And this was your reply:
�
First, STOP using ‘mullahs’ which is insulting to Iranian people. These people have chosen their own dress code and do not like to wear Western clothing.Let me use the term 'Iranian Theocrats' in lieu of 'Iranian Mullahs'. Since you simply evaded my question, here's my answer to my own question:
�
Since when are the Persians involved in the Arab-Israeli Conflict which was never about religion — Islam vs Judaism — but about ideology — pan-Arabic Nationalism vs Israeli Zionism.Shah's Iran had no business getting involved in the Arab-Israeli Conflict because Iranians are mostly Persians not Arabs. After the fall of the Shah, the Iranian Theocrats then came along and got involved in the Arab-Israeli Conflict by supporting and arming the Hezbollah in response to the Israeli invasion of Southern Lebanon during its Civil War. But Israel eventually withdrew its military forces from Southern Lebanon as mandated by UN Resolution 1701 which also required the Hezbollah to disarm and relocate to north of the Litani River.My next question is:Did the Hezbollah disarm and relocate to north of the Litani River? Did Iran continue to support and arm the Hezbollah? Did Hezbollah and its IRGC backers comply with UN Resolution 1701?Please don't give me any more of the 'Evul Zionists' crap and just answer with a simple Yes or No.Replies: @Anon, @mulga mumblebrain, @ariadna
�
The Arab-Israeli conflict is one of good versus evil. Settler colonialism against indigenous resistance. State terror against a supine, occupied, people. Modern armaments, tried and tested on civilians, armed only with guts and Kalashnikovs. Utter, religiously driven, barbarity and perversion, against stubborn steadfastness. Snipers against children. Iran, and the non-Western world, chose to support the good, and the West serves its Masters.
https://pixel.nymag.com/imgs/daily/intelligencer/2015/03/03/bibi-gifs/bibi-claps.nocrop.w536.h2147483647.giffinally, someone who 'gets it'.Bibi is our slave.He is sacrificing everything in service to America.He doesn't want to bomb Gaza and Lebanon and Syria and Iran. Of course not.He only wants peace!But America won't allow him or the Jews to have peace!Just like America won't leave the Third World alone, and demands that they all come here. Ripping families apart as the young men are forced to leave to make a new life for themselves on the American welfare system. It's beyond cruel and inhumane, but what do you expect from America?I'm tired of all these people saying 'Jew this and Jew that'. Haven't the Jews been persecuted enough?!America used them to foment two disastrous World Wars, that targeted the Jews for a "Holocaust"!Then America did a false flag on itself on 9/11, because it wanted to use Israel as a pretext for endless wars in the Middle East, to steal oil, and murder Muslims, because what we all know, is America is nothing if not racist!And the terrible irony, is that racist America, [redundant] is now again exploiting Jews in order to murder Palestinian children, because America just loves to kill brown people, because of their racism. Just like America is imposing this war in Ukraine, and cynically using a Jew as the figurehead, so they can kill and maim, because that's all Americans care about. Killing and maiming and stealing other people's land, like the West Bank and the Golan Heights. And now the Americans want to bomb Iran! Even as the Jews are begging them not to!Is there no limit to America's rapine? Is there no limit to their racism?How many Jews are going to have to die, before America sends it's service men and women into Gaza and Lebanon? How many Jews are going to have to die, before America is willing to bomb Iran?Already there are pogroms again in Europe. Already there is a replay of Kristallnacht, how far away is yet another "Holocaust" America?! Are you blind?!And now wars on Afghanistan and wars on Iraq and Libya and Syria! All so America could kill brown people, and blame it on the Jews! Like always!Sorry to froth like that Joe Wong, but your comment really hit a nerve.I'm tired of America and Americans demanding all these wars and immigration and wokeness and genocide in Gaza, and then blaming it all on innocent Jews!
Blaming Zionists for America’s wrong-doings is simply irresponsible, unethical, and wicked.In Jew’s eyes, they are paying a very high price for doing American’s dirty work.
�
Yep-Americans finance and control all sides in Israeli politics, Americans make up most of the higher echelons of Bibi’s administration and Americans control the Israeli MSM. Yes, indeedy!
It is moral insanity to hate a good and decent human being just because they are Jewish. Mind you, being good and decent and human makes being a ‘Jew’ more an act of habit rather than conviction.
There is no such thing as a "Jew" anymore. Moses invented Judaism. Moses killed Hebroids in order to eventually deliver the Messiah. The Prophets followed his vision. When Jesus Christ appeared, the last of the "Jews" were slipping away into Satanism. Christ became alienated from his own family. Christ became targeted by what was now a Satanic nation. It dawned upon Christ what his fate would be, and he went out with his head held high like a king, knowing of his own return. He eventually became the spiritual King of Western Civilization, the closest in history to uniting heaven and earth per Christ's prophesy in the Lord's Prayer. The "Jews" went into full blown Satanism, and have been inciting against Christendom ever since. Splinters of Hebroids were devastated about what they and their nation did to the Christ, wracked with guilt. They got the ball rolling in what would become the total annihilation of "Israel" (the Satanic state).
It is moral insanity to hate a good and decent human being just because they are Jewish.
�
"Good and decent" should never be conflated with the Synagogue of Satan under any conditions. It's the opening they're looking for to despoil the good and the decent. As Satanists, they're out for the blood of Moses and the blood of Christ, non-stop.
Mind you, being good and decent and human makes being a ‘Jew’ more an act of habit rather than conviction.
�
This is an excellent case of two people disagreeing on a topic and both are wrong.
It’s beginning to look like a revised version of the Onion, here at UR
Thank both of you (and Joe Wong) too for the mirth!
it seems there's nothing they won't do for us.
Let’s also not forget, Rurik, the supreme sacrifice they’re making for us by getting themselves indicted at The Hague for genocide,
�
It's nice I'm not the only one that sees it, Chris
it’s just that they feel obligated to us to steal Palestinian homes and to threaten their neighbors constantly.
�
they're understandably afraid to go against us, in any way. And can you blame them? with 2000 years of persecution, and pogroms back in Europe, and with Hitler slated for the White House, it must be terrible.
they feign 90%+ support for absolutely every act of mass murder we force them to commit.
�
we did that to them Chris. We heaped so much opprobrium upon them, and so much guilt and self-loathing, that they're now putty in our hands. We made them docile, and since they're intrinsically such a deeply spiritual people, and so self-reflective and empathetic, they can't abide the global anti-semitism that is resurgent. So they internalize our guilt, and blame themselves.
but can you think of a more docile population which we’ve manipulated to go against their own interests? I mean, leaving out the Europeans and white Western societies, of course
�
No, we don't deserve them Chris. Not even close.
Do we even deserve such friends??
�
Yes! that's the encouraging thing.But it will take all of us. In a kind of global realignment of planetary rectitude, and it is waayyy overdue..Replies: @chris
Can we ever pay them back??
�
LOL!!!!
Thanks Joe Wong for bringing light into our darkness!!
Let’s also not forget, Rurik, the supreme sacrifice they’re making for us by getting themselves indicted at The Hague for genocide,
it seems there’s nothing they won’t do for us.
it’s just that they feel obligated to us to steal Palestinian homes and to threaten their neighbors constantly.
It’s nice I’m not the only one that sees it, Chris
they feign 90%+ support for absolutely every act of mass murder we force them to commit.
they’re understandably afraid to go against us, in any way. And can you blame them?
with 2000 years of persecution, and pogroms back in Europe, and with Hitler slated for the White House, it must be terrible.
but can you think of a more docile population which we’ve manipulated to go against their own interests? I mean, leaving out the Europeans and white Western societies, of course
we did that to them Chris. We heaped so much opprobrium upon them, and so much guilt and self-loathing, that they’re now putty in our hands. We made them docile, and since they’re intrinsically such a deeply spiritual people, and so self-reflective and empathetic, they can’t abide the global anti-semitism that is resurgent. So they internalize our guilt, and blame themselves.
Do we even deserve such friends??
No, we don’t deserve them Chris. Not even close.
Can we ever pay them back??
Yes! that’s the encouraging thing.
But it will take all of us. In a kind of global realignment of planetary rectitude, and it is waayyy overdue..
Then came the Iranian Mullahs who wanted to pick a fight with the Israeli Zionists by sacrificing their own national interests for what? To save Palestinian Arabs?And this was your reply:
�
First, STOP using ‘mullahs’ which is insulting to Iranian people. These people have chosen their own dress code and do not like to wear Western clothing.Let me use the term 'Iranian Theocrats' in lieu of 'Iranian Mullahs'. Since you simply evaded my question, here's my answer to my own question:
�
Since when are the Persians involved in the Arab-Israeli Conflict which was never about religion — Islam vs Judaism — but about ideology — pan-Arabic Nationalism vs Israeli Zionism.Shah's Iran had no business getting involved in the Arab-Israeli Conflict because Iranians are mostly Persians not Arabs. After the fall of the Shah, the Iranian Theocrats then came along and got involved in the Arab-Israeli Conflict by supporting and arming the Hezbollah in response to the Israeli invasion of Southern Lebanon during its Civil War. But Israel eventually withdrew its military forces from Southern Lebanon as mandated by UN Resolution 1701 which also required the Hezbollah to disarm and relocate to north of the Litani River.My next question is:Did the Hezbollah disarm and relocate to north of the Litani River? Did Iran continue to support and arm the Hezbollah? Did Hezbollah and its IRGC backers comply with UN Resolution 1701?Please don't give me any more of the 'Evul Zionists' crap and just answer with a simple Yes or No.Replies: @Anon, @mulga mumblebrain, @ariadna
�
After the fall of the Shah, the Iranian Theocrats then came along and got involved in the Arab-Israeli Conflict by supporting and arming the Hezbollah in response to the Israeli invasion of Southern Lebanon during its Civil War.
You are extremely ignorant. What were you doing all these years at this site? You have learned NOTHING, NOTHING, and Nothing.
The Iran’s involvement was to prevent the US/Israel project to bring down the regional government, including Iran, to bring the region and its resources under the control of evil West. This project was directly targeted Iran and other countries, remember 7 countries in 5 years. That’s why Iran and general Soleimani designed a road map to prevent this project where still is in progress. That’s why Trump assassinated General Soleimani. The evil US does not want the regional countries have self defense, so they can attack them at will. There wars were not religious war. Religion was used as a cover.
I am shocked at your ignorance.
But Israel eventually withdrew its military forces from Southern Lebanon as mandated by UN Resolution 1701 which also required the Hezbollah to disarm and relocate to north of the Litani River.
Israel was forced to leave Lebanon, because she could not be the winner. Israel did not leave Lebanon because it was ‘good’ gesture, she was kicked out of Lebanon by Hizbollah.
Now, Israel and US is pressuring Lebanon to accept 1701, but Israel wants to have a free hand to bomb Lebanon where is NOT acceptable by Hizbollah. They said they are prepared to defend the country for a LONG time until Israel accept 1701 fully.
Are you Iranian? You sound like the traitor fifth column, ‘reformists’, who say NO to Gaza No to Lebanon, only Iran (they don’t think about Iranian’s interest, they think about their own selfish interests which is AGAINST the interest of Iran. They are TRAITORS. Zarif is one of them.
Palestinian question is NOT limited to Arabs, since ‘Israel Project’ has been designed for the region as a FOOTSTEP to create chaos and war to weaken the regional countries partitioning these weaker countries into smaller pieces to create, for example, ‘kurdistan’ as an ally of Israel, where Iran is going to be targeted. So, ‘Israel Project’ is not only against Palestinians’ interest, stealing their land, but also against the interest of EVERY SINGLE COUNTRY in the region including Iran. If you have not understood this basic fact, then you have to go and study the history of Palestine and the region before posting another comment.
Please don’t give me any more of the ‘Evul Zionists’ crap a
The crap is you and people like you who most of the time are thanking the CIA agent, philip Giraldi for his crap who makes ‘the jews’ guilty but leave the MAIN enemy of humanity, the evil US, as ‘victim’.
What is happening in the region against Iran, Palestine, Lebanon and Arabs is the US policy who is sitting in the DRIVING seat using its MAD DOG, Israel to implement its policy, mainly to control the region and steal its resources against china. The people of the region including Hizbollah and Iran NEVER say this is ‘the jews’ policy’, but this is US foreign policy no matter which devil is at the whore house. The people of the region, including Hizbollah, can DEFEAT the MAD DOG, in NO time, if US fuck off from the region and stop shipping Arms and stolen money from American Tax Payers.
The American Daniel Martindale operated on the territory of Ukraine for two years during the Special Military Operation and from there sent very valuable intelligence to Russia.
Before him, a former member of the US Army, John McIntyre, who served in the Armed Forces of Ukraine as a foreign mercenary, became famous, and when he saw that the Nazis brutally killed civilians and prisoners of war, John decided to go over to the side of Russia and take the secrets with him. documents with plans for the coming year — maps and intelligence.
He testified that numerous Russian prisoners of war were stabbed and their genitals were cut off. Also, that many members of the Ukrainian army did not get over the smuggling of American weapons.
The president of the “Together with Russia” movement, Vladimir Rogov, states that several thousand volunteers from many countries of the world want to fight on the side of Russia. It became clear that the geography of those who want to join the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation refers not only to the post-Soviet space, where the memory of the heroic feat of the ancestors who saved the world from fascism (after their “pre-emptive†aggression) is preserved, but and to economically developed countries: USA, Great Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Middle East, Latin America, including Brazil and Argentina. Their motivation is quite high because they want to preserve traditional society and help Russia in the fight against Nazism.
War correspondent WarGonzo Timofey Yermakov presents similar data. He claims that volunteers from Colombia, Mexico, Great Britain, Latvia and Serbia are fighting on the side of Russia. People from Latin America, where American repression, robbery and humiliation are the most dominant, have a special desire to join the SMO and Russia.
The story of a wounded Polish mercenary left for dead by his comrades is similar to the story of the two Americans. Russian captivity and the meanness of Ukrainian militants, which he felt on his own skin, literally opened his eyes — the Pole decided to free Ukraine and all of Europe from Nazism together with Russia. After that, the former mercenary recorded a video address, and he wears a Z on his sleeve.
Many Ukrainians are defecting to Russia just as Daniel and John did – because of the brutality of the Ukrainian army towards civilians and subjugated soldiers. In the contribution published by the American video blogger and independent journalist Patrick Lancaster, it is stated that the main reason that Ukrainian soldiers go over to the side of Russia is precisely the cruelty of the Ukrainian units, especially the Azov regiment.
Beautiful White women flee rural areas and their natural mates for cities. What do they want? – riches? sophistication? the cock carousel? — I really don’t know, and I’ve come to doubt that they know what they want, either.
Interesting comment, Thrallman.
‘Je suis Omar Mateen’ left the following comment under Anglin’s Gaetz article yesterday:
Most women want a hard throbbing c**k betwixt their thighs around age 14 or 15, some even sooner. At 17 ALL women want the above.
I can attest to the truth of this, having seen it lately in my own family. The intensity of the urge is awe inspiring.
Anglin rakes white women over the coals constantly. So do some commenters on TUR. Statistics suggest that women are criticized far in excess of the justifiable. I just don’t know…
You write
…the Muslim fundamentalists win because they uphold the patriarchy.
Anglin makes that point constantly, too. I agree.
We’re always saying, “You can’t fight Mother Nature,†and that’s an obviously true fact. Yet ‘progressives’ (hateful word!) deny and ignore nature as a matter of policy.
It’s all so bizarre, and unnecessary, and ruinous of human happiness.
It doesn’t take a genius to recognize that Talmudic behavior is the real cause of Anti-Semitism. But the implications are far more serious. Meyer Amschel Rothschild was a Talmudist. This satanic hatred of humanity, and Christianity in particular, is driving the New World Order.
There is a direct line between the Crucifixion of Christ, who represented the God of Love, 9-11 and the New World Order in terms of the degradation of humanity through war and depression. If this logic is correct, humanity’s fate is to be crucified like Christ or otherwise slaughtered or enslaved.
Like Stephen Bloom and myself, 90% of American Jews are secular and ignorant of the Talmud.
We find its views abhorrent. But these attitudes are the hidden agenda of Zionism and the Khazarian Mafia. A Gentile elite consisting of Freemasons has been installed by the Jewish bankers to advance this agenda.
The New World Order imperils humanity and assimilated Jews. As conditions deteriorate, anti-Semitism may become rampant. Jews must recognize that Judaism is not a religion but a conspiracy against humanity.
It is also a conspiracy against Jews, whose security is endangered by its secret agenda. Zionism, Communism, Socialism, Liberalism, Neo Conservatism, Feminism are all deceitful means to establish the Masonic/Talmudic/Cabalistic central bankers in a thinly veiled “world government†tyranny.
There is no such thing as “America First†when it comes to Trump. What we have seen thus far is “Chabad Firstâ€; “Israel Firstâ€; “Saudi Arabia Firstâ€; “Netanyahu Firstâ€;
Assimilated Jews need to dis-associate from organized Jewry and re-invent themselves as a people, recognizing how, like other peoples, they have been deceived and exploited by their so-called leaders.
Like Stephen Bloom, many assimilated Jews have a strong sense of truth, justice and God’s bountifulness, and must join their Christian neighbors in putting America back on track.
FROM
Former Chabad Member Exposes Trump Family Cult
https://whiskeytangotexas.com/2022/03/17/former-chabad-member-exposes-trump-family-cult/
…by Jonas E. Alexis, Henry Makow, and Michael Berg… Jewish men.
What part of it still stumps you?
https://pixel.nymag.com/imgs/daily/intelligencer/2015/03/03/bibi-gifs/bibi-claps.nocrop.w536.h2147483647.giffinally, someone who 'gets it'.Bibi is our slave.He is sacrificing everything in service to America.He doesn't want to bomb Gaza and Lebanon and Syria and Iran. Of course not.He only wants peace!But America won't allow him or the Jews to have peace!Just like America won't leave the Third World alone, and demands that they all come here. Ripping families apart as the young men are forced to leave to make a new life for themselves on the American welfare system. It's beyond cruel and inhumane, but what do you expect from America?I'm tired of all these people saying 'Jew this and Jew that'. Haven't the Jews been persecuted enough?!America used them to foment two disastrous World Wars, that targeted the Jews for a "Holocaust"!Then America did a false flag on itself on 9/11, because it wanted to use Israel as a pretext for endless wars in the Middle East, to steal oil, and murder Muslims, because what we all know, is America is nothing if not racist!And the terrible irony, is that racist America, [redundant] is now again exploiting Jews in order to murder Palestinian children, because America just loves to kill brown people, because of their racism. Just like America is imposing this war in Ukraine, and cynically using a Jew as the figurehead, so they can kill and maim, because that's all Americans care about. Killing and maiming and stealing other people's land, like the West Bank and the Golan Heights. And now the Americans want to bomb Iran! Even as the Jews are begging them not to!Is there no limit to America's rapine? Is there no limit to their racism?How many Jews are going to have to die, before America sends it's service men and women into Gaza and Lebanon? How many Jews are going to have to die, before America is willing to bomb Iran?Already there are pogroms again in Europe. Already there is a replay of Kristallnacht, how far away is yet another "Holocaust" America?! Are you blind?!And now wars on Afghanistan and wars on Iraq and Libya and Syria! All so America could kill brown people, and blame it on the Jews! Like always!Sorry to froth like that Joe Wong, but your comment really hit a nerve.I'm tired of America and Americans demanding all these wars and immigration and wokeness and genocide in Gaza, and then blaming it all on innocent Jews!
Blaming Zionists for America’s wrong-doings is simply irresponsible, unethical, and wicked.In Jew’s eyes, they are paying a very high price for doing American’s dirty work.
�
Oh, and to have their millennial old impeccable reputation tarred and to become known as genocidal psychopaths just to meekly carry out our criminal orders.
Do we even deserve such friends?? Can we ever pay them back??
I could go on and on.
Why not clearly state that specifically yourself?
https://pixel.nymag.com/imgs/daily/intelligencer/2015/03/03/bibi-gifs/bibi-claps.nocrop.w536.h2147483647.giffinally, someone who 'gets it'.Bibi is our slave.He is sacrificing everything in service to America.He doesn't want to bomb Gaza and Lebanon and Syria and Iran. Of course not.He only wants peace!But America won't allow him or the Jews to have peace!Just like America won't leave the Third World alone, and demands that they all come here. Ripping families apart as the young men are forced to leave to make a new life for themselves on the American welfare system. It's beyond cruel and inhumane, but what do you expect from America?I'm tired of all these people saying 'Jew this and Jew that'. Haven't the Jews been persecuted enough?!America used them to foment two disastrous World Wars, that targeted the Jews for a "Holocaust"!Then America did a false flag on itself on 9/11, because it wanted to use Israel as a pretext for endless wars in the Middle East, to steal oil, and murder Muslims, because what we all know, is America is nothing if not racist!And the terrible irony, is that racist America, [redundant] is now again exploiting Jews in order to murder Palestinian children, because America just loves to kill brown people, because of their racism. Just like America is imposing this war in Ukraine, and cynically using a Jew as the figurehead, so they can kill and maim, because that's all Americans care about. Killing and maiming and stealing other people's land, like the West Bank and the Golan Heights. And now the Americans want to bomb Iran! Even as the Jews are begging them not to!Is there no limit to America's rapine? Is there no limit to their racism?How many Jews are going to have to die, before America sends it's service men and women into Gaza and Lebanon? How many Jews are going to have to die, before America is willing to bomb Iran?Already there are pogroms again in Europe. Already there is a replay of Kristallnacht, how far away is yet another "Holocaust" America?! Are you blind?!And now wars on Afghanistan and wars on Iraq and Libya and Syria! All so America could kill brown people, and blame it on the Jews! Like always!Sorry to froth like that Joe Wong, but your comment really hit a nerve.I'm tired of America and Americans demanding all these wars and immigration and wokeness and genocide in Gaza, and then blaming it all on innocent Jews!
Blaming Zionists for America’s wrong-doings is simply irresponsible, unethical, and wicked.In Jew’s eyes, they are paying a very high price for doing American’s dirty work.
�
Let’s also not forget, Rurik, the supreme sacrifice they’re making for us by getting themselves indicted at The Hague for genocide, just to carry out our own draconian orders.
They really don’t even want the “greater Israel†we’re pushing on them. They would love to live in peace with their Palestinian co-nationals as well as with their neighboring countries, it’s just that they feel obligated to us to steal Palestinian homes and to threaten their neighbors constantly.
The Jewish oligarchs don’t want any of this either, it’s just that they’re being manipulated by us into selling out their own people.
What’s worse, you say? What’s worse is that these people have been so terrorized by us that they’re living in total fear here and in Israel about even opening their mouths to complain about any of this.
We control their media in the land which they stole to such an extent that they’re just towing our line in everything we say, and even the opinion poles over there are either completely manipulated or faked so that they feign 90%+ support for absolutely every act of mass murder we force them to commit.
I don’t know Rurik, but can you think of a more docile population which we’ve manipulated to go against their own interests? I mean, leaving out the Europeans and white Western societies, of course; but besides these people, can you really think of a more docile population, or one with a deeper, almost maniacal sense of sacrifice and stoicism than these people?
I certainly can’t.
it seems there's nothing they won't do for us.
Let’s also not forget, Rurik, the supreme sacrifice they’re making for us by getting themselves indicted at The Hague for genocide,
�
It's nice I'm not the only one that sees it, Chris
it’s just that they feel obligated to us to steal Palestinian homes and to threaten their neighbors constantly.
�
they're understandably afraid to go against us, in any way. And can you blame them? with 2000 years of persecution, and pogroms back in Europe, and with Hitler slated for the White House, it must be terrible.
they feign 90%+ support for absolutely every act of mass murder we force them to commit.
�
we did that to them Chris. We heaped so much opprobrium upon them, and so much guilt and self-loathing, that they're now putty in our hands. We made them docile, and since they're intrinsically such a deeply spiritual people, and so self-reflective and empathetic, they can't abide the global anti-semitism that is resurgent. So they internalize our guilt, and blame themselves.
but can you think of a more docile population which we’ve manipulated to go against their own interests? I mean, leaving out the Europeans and white Western societies, of course
�
No, we don't deserve them Chris. Not even close.
Do we even deserve such friends??
�
Yes! that's the encouraging thing.But it will take all of us. In a kind of global realignment of planetary rectitude, and it is waayyy overdue..Replies: @chris
Can we ever pay them back??
�
If my answer helps you to understand my comment, yes, it does. Read the last line again. Slowly.
https://pixel.nymag.com/imgs/daily/intelligencer/2015/03/03/bibi-gifs/bibi-claps.nocrop.w536.h2147483647.giffinally, someone who 'gets it'.Bibi is our slave.He is sacrificing everything in service to America.He doesn't want to bomb Gaza and Lebanon and Syria and Iran. Of course not.He only wants peace!But America won't allow him or the Jews to have peace!Just like America won't leave the Third World alone, and demands that they all come here. Ripping families apart as the young men are forced to leave to make a new life for themselves on the American welfare system. It's beyond cruel and inhumane, but what do you expect from America?I'm tired of all these people saying 'Jew this and Jew that'. Haven't the Jews been persecuted enough?!America used them to foment two disastrous World Wars, that targeted the Jews for a "Holocaust"!Then America did a false flag on itself on 9/11, because it wanted to use Israel as a pretext for endless wars in the Middle East, to steal oil, and murder Muslims, because what we all know, is America is nothing if not racist!And the terrible irony, is that racist America, [redundant] is now again exploiting Jews in order to murder Palestinian children, because America just loves to kill brown people, because of their racism. Just like America is imposing this war in Ukraine, and cynically using a Jew as the figurehead, so they can kill and maim, because that's all Americans care about. Killing and maiming and stealing other people's land, like the West Bank and the Golan Heights. And now the Americans want to bomb Iran! Even as the Jews are begging them not to!Is there no limit to America's rapine? Is there no limit to their racism?How many Jews are going to have to die, before America sends it's service men and women into Gaza and Lebanon? How many Jews are going to have to die, before America is willing to bomb Iran?Already there are pogroms again in Europe. Already there is a replay of Kristallnacht, how far away is yet another "Holocaust" America?! Are you blind?!And now wars on Afghanistan and wars on Iraq and Libya and Syria! All so America could kill brown people, and blame it on the Jews! Like always!Sorry to froth like that Joe Wong, but your comment really hit a nerve.I'm tired of America and Americans demanding all these wars and immigration and wokeness and genocide in Gaza, and then blaming it all on innocent Jews!
Blaming Zionists for America’s wrong-doings is simply irresponsible, unethical, and wicked.In Jew’s eyes, they are paying a very high price for doing American’s dirty work.
�
Bahahaha!!!
He’s definitely trolling us, Rurik!
I mean nobody can be that stupid or think anyone else could be so stupid as to believe something so preposterous. …. can they?
Does your comment apply to Ron Unz?
Blaming Zionists for America’s wrong-doings is simply irresponsible, unethical, and wicked.
In Jew’s eyes, they are paying a very high price for doing American’s dirty work.
finally, someone who ‘gets it’.
Bibi is our slave.
He is sacrificing everything in service to America.
He doesn’t want to bomb Gaza and Lebanon and Syria and Iran. Of course not.
He only wants peace!
But America won’t allow him or the Jews to have peace!
Just like America won’t leave the Third World alone, and demands that they all come here. Ripping families apart as the young men are forced to leave to make a new life for themselves on the American welfare system. It’s beyond cruel and inhumane, but what do you expect from America?
I’m tired of all these people saying ‘Jew this and Jew that’. Haven’t the Jews been persecuted enough?!
America used them to foment two disastrous World Wars, that targeted the Jews for a “Holocaust”!
Then America did a false flag on itself on 9/11, because it wanted to use Israel as a pretext for endless wars in the Middle East, to steal oil, and murder Muslims, because what we all know, is America is nothing if not racist!
And the terrible irony, is that racist America, [redundant] is now again exploiting Jews in order to murder Palestinian children, because America just loves to kill brown people, because of their racism.
Just like America is imposing this war in Ukraine, and cynically using a Jew as the figurehead, so they can kill and maim, because that’s all Americans care about. Killing and maiming and stealing other people’s land, like the West Bank and the Golan Heights. And now the Americans want to bomb Iran! Even as the Jews are begging them not to!
Is there no limit to America’s rapine? Is there no limit to their racism?
How many Jews are going to have to die, before America sends it’s service men and women into Gaza and Lebanon? How many Jews are going to have to die, before America is willing to bomb Iran?
Already there are pogroms again in Europe. Already there is a replay of Kristallnacht, how far away is yet another “Holocaust” America?! Are you blind?!
And now wars on Afghanistan and wars on Iraq and Libya and Syria! All so America could kill brown people, and blame it on the Jews! Like always!
Sorry to froth like that Joe Wong, but your comment really hit a nerve.
I’m tired of America and Americans demanding all these wars and immigration and wokeness and genocide in Gaza, and then blaming it all on innocent Jews!
!!
Beautiful White women flee rural areas and their natural mates for cities. What do they want? – riches? sophistication? the cock carousel? — I really don’t know, and I’ve come to doubt that they know what they want, either.
jew media has sold them a lie, put them on pharmaceuticals, vaccinated them with toxins, made them schizophrenic… no, they don’t know what they want.
In the long run, the Muslim fundamentalists win because they uphold the patriarchy.
Would that be the patriarchy that partnered with the jews on the 9/11 inside job and wars — either literally, or by refusing to see it was a jew job? Would that include the Petrodollar Saudi patriarchy? The Arab oil patriarchy? The nest of vipers who were aiming to knock off rivals by partnering with jews and have destroyed the Mideast?
Anyone who partners with Satan gets no respect, and deserves none. In fact, they deserve death.
You’re so wong!
I asked a simple question:
Then came the Iranian Mullahs who wanted to pick a fight with the Israeli Zionists by sacrificing their own national interests for what? To save Palestinian Arabs?
And this was your reply:
First, STOP using ‘mullahs’ which is insulting to Iranian people. These people have chosen their own dress code and do not like to wear Western clothing.
Let me use the term ‘Iranian Theocrats’ in lieu of ‘Iranian Mullahs’. Since you simply evaded my question, here’s my answer to my own question:
Since when are the Persians involved in the Arab-Israeli Conflict which was never about religion — Islam vs Judaism — but about ideology — pan-Arabic Nationalism vs Israeli Zionism.
Shah’s Iran had no business getting involved in the Arab-Israeli Conflict because Iranians are mostly Persians not Arabs. After the fall of the Shah, the Iranian Theocrats then came along and got involved in the Arab-Israeli Conflict by supporting and arming the Hezbollah in response to the Israeli invasion of Southern Lebanon during its Civil War. But Israel eventually withdrew its military forces from Southern Lebanon as mandated by UN Resolution 1701 which also required the Hezbollah to disarm and relocate to north of the Litani River.
My next question is:
Did the Hezbollah disarm and relocate to north of the Litani River? Did Iran continue to support and arm the Hezbollah? Did Hezbollah and its IRGC backers comply with UN Resolution 1701?
Please don’t give me any more of the ‘Evul Zionists’ crap and just answer with a simple Yes or No.
Blaming Zionists for America’s wrong-doings is simply irresponsible, unethical, and wicked.
In Jew’s eyes, they are paying a very high price for doing American’s dirty work.
Do you have any idea how long the Synagogue of Satan has been around, and how much havoc, wars and systematic mass murder it has wrought? Start by listening to the Rolling Stones’ Sympathy For The Devil, keeping in mind how many hundreds of nations the jews have been thrown out of over the centuries.
The U.S. has been at war 222 out of 239 years of its existence.
The world has been at war 100% of its existence, and the jews have been inciting and profiteering from it 100% of their existence.
One has to ask, how many of these wars never would have taken place absent the jews and their diabolical greed and pathological drive to mass murder and sow discord and enmity, and then blame the “other”, as you are doing?
Take the 9/11 jewish instigated, planned and executed inside job, for example, and then the corrupt MSM and political classs’ coordinated drive to lie and stampede the nation into war, and mass murder and displace millions Arabs in its wake.
None of that ever would have happened but for Satanic JEWS, Zionists, kosher “liberals”, kosher Deep State, and their Satanic partners in crime like the Petrodollar Saudis.
I have ZERO sympathy for the Devil.
In Jew’s eyes, they are paying a very high price for doing American’s dirty work.
You mean in your Satanic eyes your paying a very high price for being a Satanist, “Joe Wong”? As well you should. All Satanists have only just begun to pay… and pay and pay and pay…
This is the Age of the Internet. Get used to it.
Excellent point, Hacienda.
Maybe large numbers of whites despise themselves and really lust for The Other.
�
This is an excellent point. Beautiful White women flee rural areas and their natural mates for cities. What do they want? – riches? sophistication? the cock carousel? — I really don’t know, and I’ve come to doubt that they know what they want, either.
In the long run, the Muslim fundamentalists win because they uphold the patriarchy. The irony is that the technocrat progressives can’t see this coming.
jew media has sold them a lie, put them on pharmaceuticals, vaccinated them with toxins, made them schizophrenic... no, they don't know what they want.
Beautiful White women flee rural areas and their natural mates for cities. What do they want? – riches? sophistication? the cock carousel? — I really don’t know, and I’ve come to doubt that they know what they want, either.
�
Would that be the patriarchy that partnered with the jews on the 9/11 inside job and wars -- either literally, or by refusing to see it was a jew job? Would that include the Petrodollar Saudi patriarchy? The Arab oil patriarchy? The nest of vipers who were aiming to knock off rivals by partnering with jews and have destroyed the Mideast?Anyone who partners with Satan gets no respect, and deserves none. In fact, they deserve death.
In the long run, the Muslim fundamentalists win because they uphold the patriarchy.
�
Interesting comment, Thrallman.
Beautiful White women flee rural areas and their natural mates for cities. What do they want? – riches? sophistication? the cock carousel? — I really don’t know, and I’ve come to doubt that they know what they want, either.
�
I can attest to the truth of this, having seen it lately in my own family. The intensity of the urge is awe inspiring.
Most women want a hard throbbing c**k betwixt their thighs around age 14 or 15, some even sooner. At 17 ALL women want the above.
�
Anglin makes that point constantly, too. I agree.
…the Muslim fundamentalists win because they uphold the patriarchy.
�
Please stop this sickening pretending the victim game. The Americans always blame somebody else for their wicked wrongdoings.
Donald Trump is in a full-fledged blaming mode, he said others took advantage of American generosity and innocence, and he blamed other nations for stealing American jobs and factories. It is the American businesses out-shoring American jobs and factories to exploit other people, the environment, and resources to fill their greed at the expense of the American’s well-being.
The U.S. has been at war 222 out of 239 years of its existence. The USA is a democracy. Politicians reflect the people who voted for them in office. Besides, American soldiers, bureaucrats, MSM workers, academics, etc., who carry out the USA’s policies are all American citizens. Without the American citizens as willing partners, the USA will not be what it was, is, and will be. Blaming Zionists for America’s wrong-doings is simply irresponsible, unethical, and wicked.
In Jew’s eyes, they are paying a very high price for doing American’s dirty work.
Do you have any idea how long the Synagogue of Satan has been around, and how much havoc, wars and systematic mass murder it has wrought? Start by listening to the Rolling Stones' Sympathy For The Devil, keeping in mind how many hundreds of nations the jews have been thrown out of over the centuries.
Blaming Zionists for America’s wrong-doings is simply irresponsible, unethical, and wicked.In Jew’s eyes, they are paying a very high price for doing American’s dirty work.
�
The world has been at war 100% of its existence, and the jews have been inciting and profiteering from it 100% of their existence.One has to ask, how many of these wars never would have taken place absent the jews and their diabolical greed and pathological drive to mass murder and sow discord and enmity, and then blame the "other", as you are doing?Take the 9/11 jewish instigated, planned and executed inside job, for example, and then the corrupt MSM and political classs' coordinated drive to lie and stampede the nation into war, and mass murder and displace millions Arabs in its wake.None of that ever would have happened but for Satanic JEWS, Zionists, kosher "liberals", kosher Deep State, and their Satanic partners in crime like the Petrodollar Saudis.I have ZERO sympathy for the Devil.
The U.S. has been at war 222 out of 239 years of its existence.
�
You mean in your Satanic eyes your paying a very high price for being a Satanist, "Joe Wong"? As well you should. All Satanists have only just begun to pay... and pay and pay and pay...This is the Age of the Internet. Get used to it.
In Jew’s eyes, they are paying a very high price for doing American’s dirty work.
�
https://pixel.nymag.com/imgs/daily/intelligencer/2015/03/03/bibi-gifs/bibi-claps.nocrop.w536.h2147483647.giffinally, someone who 'gets it'.Bibi is our slave.He is sacrificing everything in service to America.He doesn't want to bomb Gaza and Lebanon and Syria and Iran. Of course not.He only wants peace!But America won't allow him or the Jews to have peace!Just like America won't leave the Third World alone, and demands that they all come here. Ripping families apart as the young men are forced to leave to make a new life for themselves on the American welfare system. It's beyond cruel and inhumane, but what do you expect from America?I'm tired of all these people saying 'Jew this and Jew that'. Haven't the Jews been persecuted enough?!America used them to foment two disastrous World Wars, that targeted the Jews for a "Holocaust"!Then America did a false flag on itself on 9/11, because it wanted to use Israel as a pretext for endless wars in the Middle East, to steal oil, and murder Muslims, because what we all know, is America is nothing if not racist!And the terrible irony, is that racist America, [redundant] is now again exploiting Jews in order to murder Palestinian children, because America just loves to kill brown people, because of their racism. Just like America is imposing this war in Ukraine, and cynically using a Jew as the figurehead, so they can kill and maim, because that's all Americans care about. Killing and maiming and stealing other people's land, like the West Bank and the Golan Heights. And now the Americans want to bomb Iran! Even as the Jews are begging them not to!Is there no limit to America's rapine? Is there no limit to their racism?How many Jews are going to have to die, before America sends it's service men and women into Gaza and Lebanon? How many Jews are going to have to die, before America is willing to bomb Iran?Already there are pogroms again in Europe. Already there is a replay of Kristallnacht, how far away is yet another "Holocaust" America?! Are you blind?!And now wars on Afghanistan and wars on Iraq and Libya and Syria! All so America could kill brown people, and blame it on the Jews! Like always!Sorry to froth like that Joe Wong, but your comment really hit a nerve.I'm tired of America and Americans demanding all these wars and immigration and wokeness and genocide in Gaza, and then blaming it all on innocent Jews!
Blaming Zionists for America’s wrong-doings is simply irresponsible, unethical, and wicked.In Jew’s eyes, they are paying a very high price for doing American’s dirty work.
�
Iran’s Russian-advised ICBM program: that’s the best that could happen to the world. finalize it before Zognald Trumpstein is inaugurated and launch a test on the 20th of January.
Europe does not need the EU, Europeans are pro Russians and pro Palestinians. If Germany wasn’t a totalitarian zionist shithole, AfD would aready be in power.
As for France, the only thing that holds zionist whore macron in power is his infamous police, corrupt institutions and rotten media. He has zero majority, zero approval and no credibility.
The best thing that could happen to Europe is the total and ultra violent destruction of the EU (SSR) and the end of the neoliberal, zionist puppet mock governments, replaced by nationalists or sovereign ones.
I don’t think the US can and want to go to war with China. I think they are going to be pushed to war with Iran and if they do, they will lose and the genocidal illegal state of ‘israel’ will persih as a result.
I just hope the zionists who will be expelled or killed from occupied Palestine won’t be relocated to the West as we do not want this vermin.
As for so-called ‘antisemitism”, this is not the case. What is happening is the world realizing who the Jews really are, what they have done and are doing again, how their lies (like the holohaox) don’t work anymore.
The Palestinians are semites as well and yet nobody except zionist scum hates them.
The Jews or rather the zionist Jews and their supporters deserve to be severely punished for their crimes and dispossed of their bribe money and of all their powers and positions.
Familiar Fox News performers like Pete Hegseth, appointed to lead the Pentagon, are well-known promoters of Evangelical Zionism. Hegseth has claimed to adhere to the bizarre “third temple prophecy,†which calls for the destruction of Muslim holy sites in Jerusalem.
Evangelical Zionism ? ” bizarre ‘ third temple prophecy ‘ ” which call for the destruction of Muslim holy sites in Jerusalem ? John Bolton, a bellicose Zionist ? ( Is Eric Striker a Mohammedan who prefers Jihadist invaders to Zionist owners of the Holy Land ?)
Remember this : Mecca and Medina for Mohammedans, Jerusalem for Christians and the Jewish People.
At the international conference “The bombing of Yugoslavia: Long-term implications for Serbian Society and multi-polar world formation” (12 Nov 24) it was said in the introductory presentation:
One of the foundations of the New World must be the removal of historical injustices towards the Serbs –
The war against the Serbs from the 90s and the current war against the Russians are exactly the same in substance and form. This additionally obliges us to study the Serbian experience in detail, because the methods and means were tested on the Serbs. The wars against the Serbs and the Russians can be seen as two phases of the same war – against the Orthodox Slavic civilization, whose very existence excludes the possibility of the world hegemony of Western criminals.
Serbia was the herald of the New World, the world of true equality, which today is led by Russia, China, BRICS. Serbia is on the front line, with heavy losses, resisted the first 10 years and did not fall, and Russia resisted the last 10 years and – will win.
By attacking the Serbs, NATO achieved a counter-effect – not that it did not conquer the last unconquered area of Europe, but it created a situation where it will never control the whole of Europe. And the upcoming victory of Russia will bring relief to the whole world, because it will free it forever from the Western threat. Already in 1999, Serbia showed that the West is not omnipotent.
It is necessary to abolish all judgments of the Hague Kangaroo Tribunal – the biggest abuse of the UN system.
This phenomenon likely explains why "Trump's" [Lutnick's] picks, while fanatical zionists, have not been MOTs. Even his choice for ambassador to occupied Palestine is a goy -- something that hasn't happened since Nixon. Contrast that with Biden's cabinet, which was was top-heavy with jews, making the ethnic basis for their unstinting support for the Gaza genocide a little too obvious.
The limitless support by the West (esp. the US) that emboldened them to commit genocide in Gaza and boldly proclaim their plans to gobble up lands from neighboring `and “near abroad†ME countries coupled with the support of the diaspora Jews has not only made Israel a pariah but identified the Israeli Jews with the majority of Jews anywhere in the Western world.
�
I agree with you but sadly I think that many will fall for it.
I think this Trump presidency will be more cunning and more deadly than his first.
Actually, today the language of diplomacy is already "Yiddish", for Yiddish is The Language of Deception par excellence. Yiddish was used by the Jews for centuries to deceive gentiles, and they're still at it, if mostly by other means. And just as it was useful for Christians in the past to learn Yiddish to see through Jew deception (see below), it would be useful for us to learn the modern Language of Deception used by Jews and shabbos goys in the government today: it is used everywhere throughout The Empire of the Jews, otherwise known as "the West".
Tomorrow the language of diplomacy will doubtless be Yiddish.
�
Part II Yiddish in the Service of Jewish Deception
As the discussion on the practical uses of Yiddish for Christians suggests, knowledge of the Jewish language and literature was viewed as a necessary tool to exert control over the Jews in the German lands. Knowledge of Yiddish could be translated into a passive or defensive form of control, such as defending Christians against Jewish blasphemy, deception, or criminality; or into an active or even aggressive form of control, such as missionizing among the Jews or using their own sources for polemics against them.
A Goy Who Speaks Yiddish:
Christians and the Jewish Language in Early Modern Germany �
To be sure, Yiddish business manuals did not merely aim to facilitate commercial transactions between Jews and Christians. Another aim was explicitly promoted by the authors: to help Christians defend themselves in the face of Jewish deception.
The claim that a considerable gap existed between the Jews’ public and hidden transcripts was central to many works written by converts from Judaism, who considered it their mission to bring this gap to the attention of Christians. One of these converts was Dietrich Schwab from Paderborn, whose Jüdischer Deckmantel (Jewish cloak; 1619) was often cited by later authors.27
“Many simple Christians,†Schwab wrote, “believe that the pleasant and friendly words of the Jews are pure honey, not noticing the deception that lies beneath these smooth words, and the poison hidden beneath the honey. . . . They speak peace with their neighbor, but the evil is in their hearts.â€28
Jewish duplicity, according to Schwab and other converts, was even more conspicuous in the face of power. When dealing with the authorities, claimed Brenz in his Jüdischer abgestreiffter Schlangen-Balg, the Jews “place themselves, but only on the outside, as obedient subjects [Unterthanen]; but secretly they curse and imprecate their authorities/masters [Herrschaften] . . . their mouth is full of cursing, falseness, and deceit.â€29
�
Languages are obviously means of communication. While Yiddish serves that function among Ashkenazi Jews it also has the cryptic character of an argot, the idiom used by a particular type or group of people, a more or less secret vocabulary peculiar to a group and not meant to be understood by outsiders to that group, like the thieves’ argot.
For example, the Yiddish word “lokshen†(noodles), unless used in a cooking recipe, stands for “money.â€
Unlike you, however, I believe Yiddish is doomed because young generation of diaspora would rather learn Hebrew than Yiddish.
A visiting Israeli Jew once told me a few years ago that Yiddish, like the European patronymics many Israeli Jew shed, replacing them with invented Hebrew last names (meant to emphasize their being “natives†in the “land of their ancestorsâ€), are considered by Israeli Jews an embarrassing legacy of their long persecution in the “Galut.â€
Another reason why I believe it will be relegated to mere folkloric interest is that the need for crypsis has been obviated by the Jews’ dizzying ascent to power over the past few decades. Secret whispering in argot has been replaced by raucous shouts of arrogant boasting.
I opted out in 2020, and did the same this time around. We are only allowed to vote for clowns. George Carlin was a modern day prophet.
The limitless support by the West (esp. the US) that emboldened them to commit genocide in Gaza and boldly proclaim their plans to gobble up lands from neighboring `and “near abroad†ME countries coupled with the support of the diaspora Jews has not only made Israel a pariah but identified the Israeli Jews with the majority of Jews anywhere in the Western world.
This phenomenon likely explains why “Trump’s” [Lutnick’s] picks, while fanatical zionists, have not been MOTs. Even his choice for ambassador to occupied Palestine is a goy — something that hasn’t happened since Nixon. Contrast that with Biden’s cabinet, which was was top-heavy with jews, making the ethnic basis for their unstinting support for the Gaza genocide a little too obvious.
With evangelical Christian Zionists (perceived as low status by most professional/ managerial class White goy libs) front and center, they can reframe the issue more in ideological (and less in ethnic) terms. Add in the Chomsky take of “The Zionist entity is just an outpost of the White goy supreemist American empire,” and you’ve got a narrative that’s much more useful for the semitic supremacists. Whether anyone will fall for it at this point is another question…
Quote:
“Voters who took a chance on Trump are instantly expressing buyer’s remorse before he’s even been sworn in.”
I was expressing buyer’s remorse” the instant I voted for him.
” all Jews are not Zionists and not all Zionists are Jews”
Yes, also all Jews were not communists and not all communists were Jews ,and you can make the same statements about “neolibs,” “neocons” or whatever other temporary political identity the Jews have assumed.
It doesn’t change anything about the fact that virtually all Jews are Jewish supremacists, with the exceptions being so few that they confirm the rule.
Making America Great Again has nothing to do with President Elect Trump. He is just another billionaire actor at best and worst, another stooge. Our nation needs a true campaign finance reform Bill. A statutory law promulgated and then funded in a lock box-this for purposes of enforcement) For example; removing all congressional lobbying groups, both corporate and private moguls from filling election coffers. Democracy hasn’t a prayer of coming out of the coma it is in unless our legislators decide what to do. Current efforts in Campaign Finance Reform have been shelved since 1999. Reconsideration is not coming back to the floor because 99.9% of the elected are bought and paid for, they are sock puppets of Corporate America. Our country must return to the “one-man-one vote” methodology coupled with an end to the electoral college. Discontinue electronic voting and return to paper ballot counting-We as a nation have no citizen representation without implementing these policies. All ballot counting must be completed within one day. Hint: if Brazil can do it so can we! This action greatly reduces the likelihood of fraud.
ASIDE: the argument that low population, rural areas will go unrepresented in the one man vote can be dealt with in some other way such as working on a state and local level-not federal.
In 2012 an article appeared at https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/01/05/the-corporate-capture-of-the-united-states/ It clearly identifies the actual powers that be in our small d “democracy” and unfortunately the decision making for America’s collective future(s) does not rest with voters.
Frankly speaking, total revolution is the only way out! We must once again fight for those principles our founding fathers delineated for citizens e.g., no foreign entanglements, no influence-direct or indirect from England (Wall Street/Bank of England), freedom of speech and assembly and the right to bear arms, dissolve incorporation papers once a specific business venture is completed, forbid a standing army to exist…..to name a few. Just as the Jewish Midrash resolves to bring into realization, changes in fundamental beliefs that will intermingle with existential threats today, those elements of our Constitution and Bill of Rights must reflect, as much as possible, the modern day realities that beset us. In short folks, lock and load, our representatives, individual leaders, will not change their ways peacefully -on our behalf. Caution! the disease of divide and conquer, an imported methodology from England, will be their first line of defense to challenge an armed citizenry.This technique was used during our Civil War, let’s not fall for it again!
We all know who the real war mongers are, e.g., first and foremost, the Bankers who fund enterprises engaged in the black art of changing blood into gold, their cohorts in the war economy (manufacturing) and the sons of Cain, many of whom don a military uniform. Corporations must never be allowed to overtake national heritage sites, government policy, influence or control military aggression, they must be harnessed-lest fascism come to America. We are almost there already. Lastly, what did our great president FDR say?: “The first truth is that the liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger then their democratic State itself. That in essence is Fascism-ownership of a government by an individual. by a group or by any other controlling private power” end quote. Ref: FDR Simple Truths Message to Congress, April 29, 1938
Thank you for the excellent and insightful article.
An examination of Judaism and Zionism can be best understood by examining the difference between the Written Torah, a.k.a. The Old Testament, (The Pentateuch-five books of Moses, The Prophets, and The Writings) and The Talmud (known at the time of Jesus as the Oral Traditions of the Elders or Oral Law) as well as the doctrines of the Kabbalah (Jewish occult mystical sorcery divination) the oldest form of the Oral Tradition. Examining this provides insight into the nature & origin of Zionism, why all Jews are not Zionists and not all Zionists are Jews, and how humanity arrived in the place it is in today. Here is a document that further explains https://www.eaec.org/The-Hidden-History-of-the-Antichrist–Summary-of-Lucifer-and-the-Kabbalistic-Jews--Teresa-Hillebrandt.pdf
**If the link doesn’t work it can be typed into google…that should take you to the article.
“Wtf kind of bullshit word salad is that? Lmfao. And what does your word salad sammich have to with anything I said?”
To paraphrase the adage about asking the price of an item, if you ask what a comment means, you can’t afford the mental effort of getting it. It is all a “sammich” to you.
The main target of Trump is CHINA, not Iran.You are naive to think that Trump is his own man. Trump plays the 'Commie China' card quite well in order to pander to the White racists amongst his Red State followers in the same way he plays the 'Illegal Alien' card. But his own family business -- the Trump Organization -- imports products from China and hires illegal aliens from Mexico. He is so good at playing this 'persona' because his act is funded and produced by Zionist Jews for the mass hypnosis of White deplorables. And his job is to serve his Zionist backers who owe their allegiance to the State of Israel. Everything else is just a sideshow.I personally think of Trump as a sleazy con-artist who doesn't have the guts to start any foreign wars. But his Zionist backers want Trump to attack Iran which they consider to be the existential threat to the national survival of the State of Israel. Since the Arab-Israeli Conflict began after the founding of the State of Israel, the Arabs had overestimated their own national strength by underestimating the 'Will-to-Power' of the Zionists who have succeeded in destroying the Arab World. Then came the Iranian Mullahs who wanted to pick a fight with the Israeli Zionists by sacrificing their own national interests for what? To save Palestinian Arabs? Since when are the Persians involved in the Arab-Israeli Conflict which was never about religion -- Islam vs Judaism -- but about ideology -- pan-Arabic Nationalism vs Israeli Zionism. The Iranian Mullahs may have the moral high ground in fighting for the lost cause of the Palestinian Arabs but being morally right won't save their Persian Asses from the upcoming war against Iran being planned by the Israeli Zionists. It is as simple as that.Replies: @Anon
�
{{The Iranian Mullahs may have the moral high ground in fighting for the lost cause of the Palestinian Arabs but being morally right won’t save their Persian Asses from the upcoming war against Iran being planned by the Israeli Zionists.}}
First, STOP using ‘mullahs’ which is insulting to Iranian people. These people have chosen their own dress code and do not like to wear Western clothing. I don’t like CIA agent, Giraldi, who purposely is using this term, because he does not like the Iranian government. He loves those who are a slave of US and obey US order, like Turkey.
Second, you and Striker do not know what you are talking about. In the past, the Arabs, especially the Saudi Arabia were in the pocket of US if there were a war against Iran. They needed Arab NATO for their vicious war, but as Parsi said and I believe the same, this has been changed due to Iran’s attack on Israel where penetrated the US air defense system, so the Arabs, rightly, believe they have NO protection if they give a hand to the genocidal US and Israel against Iran.
Told @BeckyCNN that the hawks around Trump believe a Saudi-Israeli alliance against Iran is still in the cards, but the Saudi and UAE are no longer interested; they want no part in such a confrontation. Partly because they know Iranian missiles can penetrate US air defenses… pic.twitter.com/uL0QlteZYM
— Trita Parsi (@tparsi) November 12, 2024
Then came the Iranian Mullahs who wanted to pick a fight with the Israeli Zionists by sacrificing their own national interests for what? To save Palestinian Arabs?And this was your reply:
�
First, STOP using ‘mullahs’ which is insulting to Iranian people. These people have chosen their own dress code and do not like to wear Western clothing.Let me use the term 'Iranian Theocrats' in lieu of 'Iranian Mullahs'. Since you simply evaded my question, here's my answer to my own question:
�
Since when are the Persians involved in the Arab-Israeli Conflict which was never about religion — Islam vs Judaism — but about ideology — pan-Arabic Nationalism vs Israeli Zionism.Shah's Iran had no business getting involved in the Arab-Israeli Conflict because Iranians are mostly Persians not Arabs. After the fall of the Shah, the Iranian Theocrats then came along and got involved in the Arab-Israeli Conflict by supporting and arming the Hezbollah in response to the Israeli invasion of Southern Lebanon during its Civil War. But Israel eventually withdrew its military forces from Southern Lebanon as mandated by UN Resolution 1701 which also required the Hezbollah to disarm and relocate to north of the Litani River.My next question is:Did the Hezbollah disarm and relocate to north of the Litani River? Did Iran continue to support and arm the Hezbollah? Did Hezbollah and its IRGC backers comply with UN Resolution 1701?Please don't give me any more of the 'Evul Zionists' crap and just answer with a simple Yes or No.Replies: @Anon, @mulga mumblebrain, @ariadna
�
“Voters who took a chance on Trump are instantly expressing buyer’s remorse before he’s even been sworn in.”
Complete and utter nonsense. I voted for Trump and I do not have buyer’s remorse nor anyone I know who also have voted for the Republicans have any regrets. Where do people come with this shit?
Facts can be triggering.
Even Hesgeth’s Wikipedia bio detailing his military career generally substantiates #52. What of it do you refute?
Actually, today the language of diplomacy is already "Yiddish", for Yiddish is The Language of Deception par excellence. Yiddish was used by the Jews for centuries to deceive gentiles, and they're still at it, if mostly by other means. And just as it was useful for Christians in the past to learn Yiddish to see through Jew deception (see below), it would be useful for us to learn the modern Language of Deception used by Jews and shabbos goys in the government today: it is used everywhere throughout The Empire of the Jews, otherwise known as "the West".
Tomorrow the language of diplomacy will doubtless be Yiddish.
�
Part II Yiddish in the Service of Jewish Deception
As the discussion on the practical uses of Yiddish for Christians suggests, knowledge of the Jewish language and literature was viewed as a necessary tool to exert control over the Jews in the German lands. Knowledge of Yiddish could be translated into a passive or defensive form of control, such as defending Christians against Jewish blasphemy, deception, or criminality; or into an active or even aggressive form of control, such as missionizing among the Jews or using their own sources for polemics against them.
A Goy Who Speaks Yiddish:
Christians and the Jewish Language in Early Modern Germany �
To be sure, Yiddish business manuals did not merely aim to facilitate commercial transactions between Jews and Christians. Another aim was explicitly promoted by the authors: to help Christians defend themselves in the face of Jewish deception.
The claim that a considerable gap existed between the Jews’ public and hidden transcripts was central to many works written by converts from Judaism, who considered it their mission to bring this gap to the attention of Christians. One of these converts was Dietrich Schwab from Paderborn, whose Jüdischer Deckmantel (Jewish cloak; 1619) was often cited by later authors.27
“Many simple Christians,†Schwab wrote, “believe that the pleasant and friendly words of the Jews are pure honey, not noticing the deception that lies beneath these smooth words, and the poison hidden beneath the honey. . . . They speak peace with their neighbor, but the evil is in their hearts.â€28
Jewish duplicity, according to Schwab and other converts, was even more conspicuous in the face of power. When dealing with the authorities, claimed Brenz in his Jüdischer abgestreiffter Schlangen-Balg, the Jews “place themselves, but only on the outside, as obedient subjects [Unterthanen]; but secretly they curse and imprecate their authorities/masters [Herrschaften] . . . their mouth is full of cursing, falseness, and deceit.â€29
�
Thanks a lot for your learned, pertinent and structured comments.
I always had a sense that Yiddish was no more than pidgin German and that the dreaded community naturally could not come up with something better than this parasitic brew.
No surprise that the inmates using that jargon as well as regular German, were able soon enough to institude “The System of Doctor Tarr and Professor Fether”.
We can surely benefit of your composure and pertinence instead of having to follow uninformed rambles and the inescapable histrionic reactions they trigger (as to French vs English, it might be wise to someone approaching the subject to seriously investigate it before posting)
Sorry to use the reply button to unload some of my frustation.