');
The Unz Review •�An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
TeasersiSteve Blog
Race and Rome

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library •�B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search TextCase SensitiveExact WordsInclude Comments
List of Bookmarks

From my new column in Taki’s Magazine:

Race and Rome

Steve Sailer
November 20, 2024

Men like thinking about the Roman Empire.

So, should Sir Ridley Scott have cast Denzel Washington as the bisexual bad guy in his new movie Gladiator II? Is it historically accurate to cast a black villain in the Roman Empire?

Conversely, should New York’s Metropolitan Museum of Art be hosting an exhibit titled “Flight Into Egypt” celebrating African-Americans’ dubious assertion that blacks are responsible for ancient Egypt’s artistic glories?

Read the whole thing there.

Hide 480�CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Should Denzel Washington have played the bad guy in Gladiator II?

    Eh, I’m not sure.

    First of all, I haven’t seen the movie. So, is Denzel playing something like the Emperor of Rome? Or a slave gladiator?

    The first role seem very dubious.

    The second seems plausible, if unlikely/unusual.

    •�Replies: @Jonathan Mason
    @EFG


    First of all, I haven’t seen the movie. So, is Denzel playing something like the Emperor of Rome? Or a slave gladiator?
    He thought he was being signed up for a remake of "The Graduate", but it was only when he arrived at rehearsals that he discovered he was in a sword and sandals epic in which he would be required to wear a miniskirt without panties. Being a consummate pro, he just got on with the job.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @BB753
    , @Corpse Tooth
    @EFG

    Denzel's role in this sequel appears to mirror Proximo from the original film, a gladiator trainer portrayed by Oliver Reed. It's sad to see Ridley, in the twilight of his career, waste his waning energy on this desperate attempt by the Jewish homosexuals and crazy white women who run Tinsel Town for the asset management firms to greenlight a movie that might actually eek out a profit. The above-the-line talent that made the Industry rich and culturally relevant the past few decades are dying off. Sad. I was hoping to interest Ridley in my brother's spec script, Bomb Cyclone! It could've led to a rebirth of the Disaster movie. But who would fill out the roster of stars that made those 70s pics so much fun. Sad.
    , @MarcusInTier
    @EFG

    Ancient Rome had very light contact with Ethiopia, that's the only "black" nation they had any contact with. The majority of Ethiopians are roughly 50% Caucasian according to DNA tests. They have black skin but have Caucasian features. Most black Americans are from Bantu stock [West Africa, south of the Sahara] and they had no contact with Rome, they also look very different from Ethiopians.

    There are Bantus in parts of Ethiopia today but they are rather recent arrivals, from the 500s AD up until today.

    Ethiopian woman and man, who are not Bantu:

    https://jenhatmaker.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/47116_1117074_1309326891-9610858.jpg
    https://i.pinimg.com/236x/e6/48/ab/e648ab460d4535f8bf5316afc1256a50.jpg

    Bantu woman and man:

    https://www.mediastorehouse.com/p/251/himba-women-perform-otjiunda-dance-1645271.jpg
    https://i.pinimg.com/originals/55/79/42/557942c4f0f0e767293aa35831c137c2.jpg


    Denzel Washington obviously has a large amount of White / Caucasian admixture himself. He has hndsome Caucasian features, especially his cheek bones and general eye shape. If he were cast to play the part of a Ethiopian during Roman times, he could pass as it. A wide nosed Bantu with typical Bantu features playing the part - NO.
  2. For example, New Zealand Maori character actor Cliff Curtis can plausibly play Arabs and Mexicans. (Presumably, there are also Mexicans and Arabs who likewise can get by credibly as Maoris.)

    In the 1968 film The Shoes of the Fisherman, Mexican actor Anthony Quinn played a Russian pope. He spoke in a Hollywood all-purpose foreign accent, replacing ‘r’s with ‘l’s, as in “Chlist was clowned with thorns.” When told he couldn’t do something, he said “I want to tly.”

    •�LOL: Liza, bomag
    •�Replies: @Rapparee
    @the one they call Desanex

    I never get the girl; I always get the country”.

    -Anthony Quinn (purportedly).
    , @anonymous
    @the one they call Desanex

    That film made sure to blame communist suppression on Russians. There is a scene where he prays with some jews because he learned from a rabbi while in a gulag.

    Likewise, in Firefox, Clint Eastwood says to a Soviet citizen, "what is it with you jews anyway? Don't you ever get tired of fighting city hall?"
    Deceptively hiding the fact that they ran the Soviet city hall.
  3. Kind of like the black Vikings shown in movies. Go figure.

    We were on vacation in Spain and Portugal and noticed other American tourists, including African American tourists. I would think instead of visiting Europe they would visit the lands of their ancestors, like Nigeria and Ghana. Or maybe they avoid them for the same reason we do. Not much to see, unclean conditions, and the likelihood of getting mugged.

    •�Agree: Mark G.
    •�Replies: @Peter Akuleyev
    @Hannah Katz

    Given that the average African American has 24% European ancestry (and educated affluent blacks probably have more than that), they should view Europe as an ancestral home. Most white American tourists to Spain and Portugual probably have as much Iberian ancestry as black Americans - almost none.

    If we could restrict tourism to Italy only to Americans with demonstrable Italian ancestry, Italy would be a far more pleasant country to visit.

    Replies: @kaganovitch, @anon, @PaceLaw
    , @jb
    @Hannah Katz

    Kind of like a TV show substituting a black woman for an actual historical Norse nobleman.

    Yes, Vikings Valhalla actually did that, and it made the show unwatchable for me, which is a shame, as Valhalla was a sequel to Vikings, which I thought was quite good. (Although it did get kind of woke towards the end, conjuring up entire armies of female warriors. Shieldmaidens do show up in the old sagas, and probably did at least occasionally see battle, but the show overdid it).

    Replies: @jb
    , @Bill Jones
    @Hannah Katz

    Maybe the Africans should go to India.
    Might make them feel better.
  4. Yes they should, because Denzel Washington is probably a really nice guy.

    •�Replies: @Nicholas Stix
    @Mike Tre

    "Denzel Washington, Bully?"

    https://nicholasstixuncensored.blogspot.com/2012/01/denzel-washington-bully.html

    Replies: @Mike Tre
  5. When the superb traditional Egyptian aesthetic, such as hieroglyphics, first emerged about 5,000 years ago, the population was largely descended from Caucasian farmers of the Fertile Crescent.

    The earliest Egyptians probably were darker-skinned than the Egyptians of Greco-Roman times, though.

    (In fact, many human populations are now known to have become lighter-skinned over the centuries, contrary to certain doom-pilled white nationalist historiographies about recessive genes and rising tides of color)

    •�Replies: @Jack D
    @IHTG

    There is a well known tomb painting from ancient Egypt (2000 BCE) showing a group of Canaanites visiting Egypt and bearing tribute to the deceased ruler. The Canaanites wear multi-colored clothing (see Joseph and his coat of may colors) and are distinctly lighter skinned/Caucasian looking) and the Egyptians are quite brown.

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f4/Procession_of_the_Aamu%2C_Tomb_of_Khnumhotep_II_%28composite%29.jpg

    Replies: @Prester John
    , @Santoculto
    @IHTG

    Darker doesnt mean racially subsaharian. Like they may had an olive skin and semitic features, even thought i have no problem if ancient Egyptians were kind of "Black", if they were a different and currently extinct breed than the negroid variant of today. The same way happened with ancient Romans and Greeks.

    Replies: @mc23
  6. Like most American museums, the Metropolitan has been terminally woke for decades now, with very few exceptions.

    The Met Museum’s current show about African-American infatuation with ancient Egypt is embarrassing because it lacks the guts to mention that blacks didn’t have much to do with Egypt’s artistic accomplishments.

    Ancient Egyptian accounts are actually consistent and specific about distinguishing themselves from the “Nubians” upriver. Some were brought downriver from time to time.

    •�Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
    @Renard

    Not only that, but they apparently divided them into "red" and "black" Nubians.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nubians#History

    Still, Disney is "reimagining" the 1980s to some effect. Walt Disney is rotating at 3,600 rpm.

    https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/11/18/10/92189629-14095709-image-a-3_1731924155483.jpg

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @Jim Don Bob
  7. Was honestly surprised by the gay Denzel stuff.

    Hasn’t the way movies are being financed changed dramatically? Hasn’t the road to success for big budget movies become more difficult?

    I would have thought that would make the investors turn against any woke stuff. If you were one investor, out ot many financial partners, wouldn’t you demand no woke stuff? Wouldn’t it only take one?

    •�Agree: Almost Missouri
    •�Replies: @TWS
    @songbird

    The goal of the investors is the woke stuff. They have said so. Hollywood is money laundering. When they want returns they buy land or government handouts.
    , @EdwardM
    @songbird

    Perhaps but who knows how many years the film has been in development. Let's see what movies look like five years from now.
  8. one of the more prestigious early converts to Christianity in The Acts of the Apostles (Acts 8:26–40) is the “Ethiopian eunuch,” treasurer to Queen Candace of Kush, whom Philip the Evangelist encounters in his chariot on the road from Jerusalem to Gaza. He was probably not from modern Ethiopia, but instead was a brownish Nubian from modern Sudan up the Nile River from Egypt.

    Probably. Incidentally, Rembrandt’s and Bruegel’s depictions of the convert show that those two painters were familiar with sub-Saharan African models but were apparently unfamiliar with eunuchs, who tend to rotund softness.

    The existence of the Nile made north-south travel in northeast Africa easier than crossing the Sahara in parched northwest Africa. … (However, the impenetrable Sudd swamp on the upper Nile effectively blocked Mediterraneans from reaching the blackest parts of Africa by river.)

    Also the infamous Six Nile Cataracts meant that it was impractical to transport above Aswan any cargo that couldn’t walk under its own power.

    the Roman Empire controlled the easy sea route to India: sail down the Red Sea

    Well, ya gotta get to the Red Sea first. And without the benefit of the Suez Canal, you have to build your ships to India from scratch somewhere on the sparsely-settled and thinly wooded Suez coast. And then you have drag your cargo back over a hundred miles of Egyptian desert.

    Richard Francis Burton has a good account of crossing this troublesome neck of land in his Personal narrative of a pilgrimage to Mecca and Medina. Even a millennium and half after the Romans, it was still a depleting undertaking prior to the Canal. One sees why the British prioritized the defense of the Suez Canal second only to the English Channel in the wars that followed.

    But there was less to trade for in Africa than in India.

    Then as now, Africa wasn’t a big value-add. Back then though, they just didn’t pretend otherwise.

    Harvard ancient DNA geneticist David Reich estimated in 2017 that among Egyptians around the time of Christ there was 6 to 15 percent sub-Saharan ancestry.

    I’ve always suspected, though I haven’t seen enough ancient DNA reports to verify, that most of that sub-Saharan DNA arrived in Egypt in the 25th Dynasty (ca. 700 BC) when Nubian invaders took over the prostrate and exhausted Kingdom, a condition from which it has never really recovered. How did Egypt get that way? Would it surprise you to learn that Egypt had spent the previous centuries doing the old Invade/Invite routine in Nubia and up the Med coast?

    •�Thanks: Old Prude, bomag
    •�Replies: @Velusian.
    @Almost Missouri

    That 6% to 14% figure for ancient Egyptians [2000 years ago] is now 14% to 21% for modern Egyptians. The Arab Muslims are the reason why, they brought millions of black slaves to North Africa and the Middle East from 650AD up until the late 1800s. All North Africans are part black today from this, same with nearly all Arabs, minus the Druze and some Christian Arab groups in the Levant.

    The change in DNA is so drastic between ancient and modern Egyptians, that ancient Egyptians are more closely related to ancient AND modern day Europeans that they are to modern Egyptians.

    The 6% to 14% figure that you cited is from the study that I have linked below. I have the parts bolded where it goes into the differences between ancient and modern Egyptians, and, how this came about [Arab slave trade - long story short].

    Invasions by Nubians mass raping ancient Egyptians is probably correct about how that 6% to 14% black ancestry got there in ancient times. It would also explain the decline of ancient Egypt as the lower IQ from black DNA would drag it down from their previous height and accomplishments.

    I have bolded the parts of the long Nature study about the DNA changes.

    Population genetic analysis of nuclear DNA

    On the nuclear level we merged the SNP data of our three ancient individuals with 2,367 modern individuals34,35 and 294 ancient genomes36 and performed PCA on the joined data set. We found the ancient Egyptian samples falling distinct from modern Egyptians, and closer towards Near Eastern and European samples (Fig. 4a, Supplementary Fig. 3, Supplementary Table 5). In contrast, modern Egyptians are shifted towards sub-Saharan African populations. Model-based clustering using ADMIXTURE37 (Fig. 4b, Supplementary Fig. 4) further supports these results and reveals that the three ancient Egyptians differ from modern Egyptians by a relatively larger Near Eastern genetic component, in particular a component found in Neolithic Levantine ancient individuals36 (Fig. 4b). In contrast, a substantially larger sub-Saharan African component, found primarily in West-African Yoruba, is seen in modern Egyptians compared to the ancient samples. In both PCA and ADMIXTURE analyses, we did not find significant differences between the three ancient samples, despite two of them having nuclear contamination estimates over 5%, which indicates no larger impact of modern DNA contamination. We used outgroup f3-statistics38 (Fig. 5a,b) for the ancient and modern Egyptians to measure shared genetic drift with other ancient and modern populations, using Mbuti as outgroup. We find that ancient Egyptians are most closely related to Neolithic and Bronze Age samples in the Levant, as well as to Neolithic Anatolian and European populations (Fig. 5a,b).

    When comparing this pattern with modern Egyptians, we find that the ancient Egyptians are more closely related to all modern and ancient European populations that we tested (Fig. 5b), likely due to the additional African component in the modern population observed above. By computing f3-statistics38, we determined whether modern Egyptians could be modelled as a mixture of ancient Egyptian and other populations. Our results point towards sub-Saharan African populations as the missing component (Fig. 5c), confirming the results of the ADMIXTURE analysis. We replicated the results based on f3-statistics using only the least contaminated sample (with <1% contamination estimate) and find very similar results (Supplementary Fig. 5), confirming that the moderate levels of modern DNA contamination in two of our samples did not affect our analyses. Finally, we used two methods to estimate the fractions of sub-Saharan African ancestry in ancient and modern Egyptians.

    Both qpAdm35 and the f4-ratio test39 reveal that modern Egyptians inherit 8% more ancestry from African ancestors than the three ancient Egyptians do, which is also consistent with the ADMIXTURE results discussed above. Absolute estimates of African ancestry using these two methods in the three ancient individuals range from 6 to 15%, and in the modern samples from 14 to 21% depending on method and choice of reference populations (see Supplementary Note 1, Supplementary Fig. 6, Supplementary Tables 5–8). We then used ALDER40 to estimate the time of a putative pulse-like admixture event, which was estimated to have occurred 24 generations ago (700 years ago), consistent with previous results from Henn and colleagues16. While this result by itself does not exclude the possibility of much older and continuous gene flow from African sources, the substantially lower African component in our ∼2,000-year-old ancient samples suggests that African gene flow in modern Egyptians occurred indeed predominantly within the last 2,000 years.
    https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms15694

    Replies: @Steve Sailer
    , @Velusian-
    @Almost Missouri

    That 6% to 14% figure for ancient Egyptians [2000 years ago] is now 14% to 21% for modern Egyptians. The Arab Muslims are the reason why, they brought millions of black slaves to North Africa and the Middle East from 650AD up until the late 1800s. All North Africans are part black today from this, same with nearly all Arabs, minus the Druze and some Christian Arab groups in the Levant.

    The change in DNA is so drastic between ancient and modern Egyptians, that ancient Egyptians are more closely related to ancient AND modern day Europeans that they are to modern Egyptians.

    The 6% to 14% figure that you cited is from the study that I have linked below. I have the parts bolded where it goes into the differences between ancient and modern Egyptians, and, how this came about [Arab slave trade - long story short].

    Invasions by Nubians mass raping ancient Egyptians is probably correct about how that 6% to 14% black ancestry got there in ancient times. It would also explain the decline of ancient Egypt as the lower IQ from black DNA would drag it down from their previous height and accomplishments.

    I have bolded the parts of the long Nature study about the DNA changes.

    Population genetic analysis of nuclear DNA

    On the nuclear level we merged the SNP data of our three ancient individuals with 2,367 modern individuals34,35 and 294 ancient genomes36 and performed PCA on the joined data set. We found the ancient Egyptian samples falling distinct from modern Egyptians, and closer towards Near Eastern and European samples (Fig. 4a, Supplementary Fig. 3, Supplementary Table 5). In contrast, modern Egyptians are shifted towards sub-Saharan African populations. Model-based clustering using ADMIXTURE37 (Fig. 4b, Supplementary Fig. 4) further supports these results and reveals that the three ancient Egyptians differ from modern Egyptians by a relatively larger Near Eastern genetic component, in particular a component found in Neolithic Levantine ancient individuals36 (Fig. 4b). In contrast, a substantially larger sub-Saharan African component, found primarily in West-African Yoruba, is seen in modern Egyptians compared to the ancient samples. In both PCA and ADMIXTURE analyses, we did not find significant differences between the three ancient samples, despite two of them having nuclear contamination estimates over 5%, which indicates no larger impact of modern DNA contamination. We used outgroup f3-statistics38 (Fig. 5a,b) for the ancient and modern Egyptians to measure shared genetic drift with other ancient and modern populations, using Mbuti as outgroup. We find that ancient Egyptians are most closely related to Neolithic and Bronze Age samples in the Levant, as well as to Neolithic Anatolian and European populations (Fig. 5a,b).

    When comparing this pattern with modern Egyptians, we find that the ancient Egyptians are more closely related to all modern and ancient European populations that we tested (Fig. 5b), likely due to the additional African component in the modern population observed above. By computing f3-statistics38, we determined whether modern Egyptians could be modelled as a mixture of ancient Egyptian and other populations. Our results point towards sub-Saharan African populations as the missing component (Fig. 5c), confirming the results of the ADMIXTURE analysis. We replicated the results based on f3-statistics using only the least contaminated sample (with <1% contamination estimate) and find very similar results (Supplementary Fig. 5), confirming that the moderate levels of modern DNA contamination in two of our samples did not affect our analyses. Finally, we used two methods to estimate the fractions of sub-Saharan African ancestry in ancient and modern Egyptians.

    Both qpAdm35 and the f4-ratio test39 reveal that modern Egyptians inherit 8% more ancestry from African ancestors than the three ancient Egyptians do, which is also consistent with the ADMIXTURE results discussed above. Absolute estimates of African ancestry using these two methods in the three ancient individuals range from 6 to 15%, and in the modern samples from 14 to 21% depending on method and choice of reference populations (see Supplementary Note 1, Supplementary Fig. 6, Supplementary Tables 5–8). We then used ALDER40 to estimate the time of a putative pulse-like admixture event, which was estimated to have occurred 24 generations ago (700 years ago), consistent with previous results from Henn and colleagues16. While this result by itself does not exclude the possibility of much older and continuous gene flow from African sources, the substantially lower African component in our ∼2,000-year-old ancient samples suggests that African gene flow in modern Egyptians occurred indeed predominantly within the last 2,000 years.
    .

    https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms15694
  9. In opera, for instance, singing ability is far more important than visual authenticity

    This is something of tradition going back to the 1960s starting IIRC with Jessye Norman. She was a pretty good singer, but unfortunately her success set off a hysterical competition among more recent opera producers to cast the The Next Jessye, or The First ______ [Asian or Queer or All-Black Cast or All-Female Production or whatever] Opera, which has led to some absurd and degraded opera, not only because even opera has limits on visual authenticity (there’s a reason they spend plenty on set designers), but also because a lot of the people they use to mount these monstrosities don’t actually sing that well. Hiring and promoting black singers with powerful pipes but no feeling for nuance is a particular bugbear.

    Denzel Washington, one of the great movie stars of his generation. (Check him out in 2012’s Flight for an example.)

    I suppose, but wasn’t Flight just an affirmative action vehicle for Denzel, and by extension for blacks generally?

    •�Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @Almost Missouri

    "and promoting black singers with powerful pipes but no feeling for nuance"

    So like, in other words, pretty much all of them.
    , @Mike Tre
    @Almost Missouri

    Denzel Washington is a very mediocre actor; the extent of his range pretty much being how far the blackity-black dial gets turned up or down. Otherwise he's the same guy in every film, and so many movies would have been better all around had a white lead been in his place (think Bruce Willis leading in Man on Fire, for example.)

    Replies: @Twinkie, @Truth
  10. The media-infotainment-indoctrination complex has been shoving Blacks! into just about everything for quite a few years now.

    •�Replies: @CalCooledge
    @Stan Adams

    If the relentless woke propaganda results in keeping alive the backlash, resulting in Vance elected in 28, let it happen.
  11. The Persian Empire was the equal of the Roman Empire. What happened? The Aryans ended up mixing with non-Aryans and it permanently hurt them.

    The same thing happened in India. Ancient India was very impressive when it was ruled by Whites after the Aryan “migration”. But then they mixed with the locals and it led to 2,000 years of misery.

    We forget those examples because they turned brown and went down and we don’t feel connected to them. Europe, on the other hand, stayed white after the Western Roman Empire fell and Europeans went on to built Western Civilization and land on the moon.

    •�Replies: @kaganovitch
    @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality


    The Persian Empire was the equal of the Roman Empire. What happened?
    Eh, Alexander happened.

    Replies: @guest007, @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality
  12. @songbird
    Was honestly surprised by the gay Denzel stuff.

    Hasn't the way movies are being financed changed dramatically? Hasn't the road to success for big budget movies become more difficult?

    I would have thought that would make the investors turn against any woke stuff. If you were one investor, out ot many financial partners, wouldn't you demand no woke stuff? Wouldn't it only take one?

    Replies: @TWS, @EdwardM

    The goal of the investors is the woke stuff. They have said so. Hollywood is money laundering. When they want returns they buy land or government handouts.

  13. The Roman emperors looked like this.

    Caracalla in the film look closer to Denzel Washington than the actor who played him

    The original Gladiator began with the Romans fighting the Germanic barbarians, the ancestors to most white Americans.

    He says to Russell Crowe: Ihr seid verfluchte hunde! “You are cursed dogs!” White Americans should be proud of their ancestors who resisted Roman conquest.

    In actuality, the Roman Empire survived for another 284 years.

    That’s completely false. Roman Empire survived for another 1261 years after Commodus.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Empire

    But you deliberate obfuscate that because the modern lands of the Eastern empire are full of brown people that you want keep out of Europe right?

    •�Disagree: TWS
    •�Replies: @BB753
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    There are plenty of reconstructions of Caracalla. None paint him as an African.
    https://youtu.be/RAuYw1jpL_U?si=HV7c3jBOc3KM94X9

    You forgot to mention that many Germanic tribes had been living in the Empire for centuries and that they were thoroughly romanized.
    For instance, the Visigoths, Vandals and Ostrogoths were heterodox Christians ( arians), not pagans.

    Not sure where you get the idea that Anatolians and Syrians were swarthy brown people.

    Replies: @Odyssey
    , @Peter Akuleyev
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    White Americans should be proud of their ancestors who resisted Roman conquest.

    Even Americans of German descent are probably mostly descended from Roman subjects. During the Völkerwandlung German tribes conquered local Romanized populations but didn't fully replace them. And most German Americans come from the Rhineland and Southwest Germany - areas which did not resist Roman conquest.

    It's also not really clear what relation the tribes wandering around Europe in the 5th century AD had, if any, to the Germanii who fought the Romans in the Teutoburg forest. Those "Germanii" may have even been Celtic speakers. When the Goths showed up, who we know for a fact spoke a Germanic language, the Romans did not consider them to be "Germanii". But Romans were not great linguists, to be fair.

    Replies: @Hapalong Cassidy, @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    , @Dmon
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    Wow - do you have the complete set of Topps Emperor Rookie cards? All I"ve been able to find is the commemorative reproduction set issued by Justinian in the 500's, and they had replaced the official photographs with artists drawings then - Belisarius's card makes him look like a Mexican cartel boss.

    Replies: @Odyssey
    , @Wokechoke
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    So they declined as the got blacked. Lol.
    , @Dutch Boy
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    Present day Italians looked pretty white to me on my travels there. I think we Americans get an impression that Italians are quite swarthy because of the large numbers of Sicilians among them in America. We had a Sicilian guide from eastern Sicily (the Greek part, as she put it) who scoffed at "those Arabs" in Western Sicily.

    Replies: @anon
    , @anon
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    But how real was Roman Antiquity though?

    How much of what the film claims to know about Rome is real?

    Reading this article one gets the impression that we don't really know much about it:

    https://www.unz.com/article/how-fake-is-roman-antiquity/

    Replies: @David Davenport
    , @Odyssey
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    It is a pity that the series of emperors in the picture is interrupted before reaching Diocletian, so we could see about 20 Serbian emperors (Constantine, Galerius, Licinius, Maximian, Justinian, etc.).

    However, there are still several Serbian emperors in this picture - Decius, Thrax, Probus, Quintilius, Herennius Etruscus, Hostilian, Aurelian (&Ulpia Severina), Claudius Gothicus.

    Among them (when the picture is enlarged) the figures of, for example, Quintilius, Claudius and Probus can still be found daily on the streets of Serbian cities.
    , @anon
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms


    The Roman emperors looked like this.
    The best way to know how the Roman emperors looked it just to look at Ashkenazi Jews.

    Ashkeanzi Jews have intermarried and interbred with the Roman elite, they didn't get their high intelligence from interbreeding with Italian peasants.

    Here we show that all four major founders, ~40% of Ashkenazi mtDNA variation, have ancestry in prehistoric Europe, rather than the Near East or Caucasus. Furthermore, most of the remaining minor founders share a similar deep European ancestry. Thus the great majority of Ashkenazi maternal lineages were not brought from the Levant, as commonly supposed, nor recruited in the Caucasus, as sometimes suggested, but assimilated within Europe.

    Overall, we estimate that most (>80%) Ashkenazi mtDNAs were assimilated within Europe. Few derive from a Near Eastern source, and despite the recent revival of the ‘Khazar hypothesis’, virtually none are likely to have ancestry in the North Caucasus.

    Given the strength of the case for even these founders having a European source, however, our best estimate is to assign ~81% of Ashkenazi lineages to a European source, ~8% to the Near East and ~1% further to the east in Asia, with ~10% remaining ambiguous.

    Thus at least two-thirds and most likely more than four-fifths of Ashkenazi maternal lineages have a European ancestry.

    Our results, primarily from the detailed analysis of the four major haplogroup K and N1b founders, but corroborated with the remaining Ashkenazi mtDNAs, suggest that most Ashkenazi maternal lineages trace their ancestry to prehistoric Europe.

    Overall, it seems that at least 80% of Ashkenazi maternal ancestry is due to the assimilation of mtDNAs indigenous to Europe, most likely through conversion. The phylogenetic nesting patterns suggest that the most frequent of the Ashkenazi mtDNA lineages were assimilated in Western Europe, ~2 ka or slightly earlier. Some in particular, including N1b2, M1a1b, K1a9 and perhaps even the major K1a1b1, point to a north Mediterranean source. It seems likely that the major founders were the result of the earliest and presumably most profound wave of founder effects, from the Mediterranean northwards into central Europe, and that most of the minor founders were assimilated in west/central Europe within the last 1,500 years.

    Despite widely differing interpretations of autosomal data, these results in fact fit well with genome-wide studies, which imply a significant European component, with particularly close relationships to Italians.

    These analyses suggest that the first major wave of assimilation probably took place in Mediterranean Europe, most likely in the Italian peninsula ~2 ka, with substantial further assimilation of minor founders in west/central Europe.

    There is surprisingly little evidence for any significant founder event from the Near East. Fewer than 10% of the Ashkenazi mtDNAs can be assigned to a Near Eastern source with any confidence, and these are found at very low frequencies. it seems likely that other more minor Near Eastern lineages are the result of more recent gene flow into the Ashkenazim.

    Others such as U1a and U1b have an ultimately Near Eastern origin but, like N1b, have been subsequently distributed around the north Mediterranean.

    In general, it is more difficult to assign lineages to a Near Eastern source with confidence, as the much larger control-region database indicates that (as with N1b2) many lineages with deep Near Eastern ancestry became widely dispersed along the north Mediterranean during the Holocene, and may alternatively have been assimilated there.

    https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms3543

  14. Here’s all you need to know.

    •�Replies: @anon
    @BB753

    Could you post a TLDR of the video?

    Does it come to the same conclusion as this insightful article?

    https://www.unz.com/article/what-race-were-the-greeks-and-romans/

    Replies: @BB753, @BB753
  15. @Hannah Katz
    Kind of like the black Vikings shown in movies. Go figure.

    We were on vacation in Spain and Portugal and noticed other American tourists, including African American tourists. I would think instead of visiting Europe they would visit the lands of their ancestors, like Nigeria and Ghana. Or maybe they avoid them for the same reason we do. Not much to see, unclean conditions, and the likelihood of getting mugged.

    Replies: @Peter Akuleyev, @jb, @Bill Jones

    Given that the average African American has 24% European ancestry (and educated affluent blacks probably have more than that), they should view Europe as an ancestral home. Most white American tourists to Spain and Portugual probably have as much Iberian ancestry as black Americans – almost none.

    If we could restrict tourism to Italy only to Americans with demonstrable Italian ancestry, Italy would be a far more pleasant country to visit.

    •�Replies: @kaganovitch
    @Peter Akuleyev


    If we could restrict tourism to Italy only to Americans with demonstrable Italian ancestry, Italy would be a far more pleasant country to visit.
    Right, it's the American tourists that are the problem, not the African migrants.

    Replies: @Peter Akuleyev
    , @anon
    @Peter Akuleyev

    Human genetic diversity in southern Europe is higher than in other regions of Europe. Most American tourists, including black Americans, but except of course Native Americans, could claim some genetic relatedness to a place like Iberia.
    , @PaceLaw
    @Peter Akuleyev

    Well said and spot on! Despite the black nationalism and pan-African imagery that many African Americans routinely engage in, only a very limited number really want to visit their ancestral homelands in West Africa, such as Ghana and Nigeria. If they do have a passport, and if they want to travel at all, it will be to places such as France where they can engage in elite consumerism of such luxury brands as Hermes, Hennessy and Lacoste. Given that educated and influent blacks are the only ones who generally travel internationally (only roughly 33% of all African-Americans even have a passport), Europe is definitely considered an ancestral homeland, even if only reluctantly

    Replies: @Steve Sailer
  16. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    The Roman emperors looked like this.

    https://www.worldhistory.org/uploads/images/12993.jpg

    Caracalla in the film look closer to Denzel Washington than the actor who played him

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/33/Sundance_Film_Festival_2024_-_Fred_Hechinger-104A1882_%28cropped%29.jpg

    The original Gladiator began with the Romans fighting the Germanic barbarians, the ancestors to most white Americans.

    He says to Russell Crowe: Ihr seid verfluchte hunde! "You are cursed dogs!" White Americans should be proud of their ancestors who resisted Roman conquest.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fuUnd9Db6Hg

    In actuality, the Roman Empire survived for another 284 years.
    That's completely false. Roman Empire survived for another 1261 years after Commodus.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Empire

    But you deliberate obfuscate that because the modern lands of the Eastern empire are full of brown people that you want keep out of Europe right?

    Replies: @BB753, @Peter Akuleyev, @Dmon, @Wokechoke, @Dutch Boy, @anon, @Odyssey, @anon

    There are plenty of reconstructions of Caracalla. None paint him as an African.

    You forgot to mention that many Germanic tribes had been living in the Empire for centuries and that they were thoroughly romanized.
    For instance, the Visigoths, Vandals and Ostrogoths were heterodox Christians ( arians), not pagans.

    Not sure where you get the idea that Anatolians and Syrians were swarthy brown people.

    •�Replies: @Odyssey
    @BB753

    Visigoths, Vandals and Ostrogoths were Serbian speaking tribes, not Germanic.
    Do you know when the Germanic tribes came from Asia to Europe? There are many historical forgeries, such as that the ancestors of today's Germans were Aryans and Goths. Today's Germans got this name from the natives of today's Germany, and I have already established that not a single German at unz knows the meaning of their name.

    Replies: @Mike Tre, @Tiptoethrutulips
  17. I once played the role of Joseph (stepfather of Jesus) in a public performance even though I am not a Jew. I believe I pulled it off rather well and that the audience was fooled.

    It is called acting. That means pretending to be someone else.

    I recently watched the first two episodes of a TV detective thriller called Death In Paradise, which is filmed in Guadalupe.

    It may have been escapist entertainment, but in the first episode a black female cop was found to be a villain, and in the second, a black employee in an expensive resort hotel was the murderer. In both the local cops were comically inept.

    Furthermore the title of the show to some extent gave away the game. Places like Jamaica, Turks and Caicos, and St. Kitts may be promoted as subtropical paradises, but they have some of the highest per capita murder rates in the world.

    So certainly there was a dose of realism in what was otherwise a kind of commercial for Caribbean tourism. I believe the show has been running for 15 seasons now and is globally popular.

    If Denzel Washington wanted to take the role, who are we to criticize? UK cop shows are full of black detectives and late middle-aged female detectives, even when set in the first half of the 20th century. Viewers want to see characters like their fantasy selves and a lot of black people watch movies and TV and buy stuff they see in commercials.

  18. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    The Roman emperors looked like this.

    https://www.worldhistory.org/uploads/images/12993.jpg

    Caracalla in the film look closer to Denzel Washington than the actor who played him

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/33/Sundance_Film_Festival_2024_-_Fred_Hechinger-104A1882_%28cropped%29.jpg

    The original Gladiator began with the Romans fighting the Germanic barbarians, the ancestors to most white Americans.

    He says to Russell Crowe: Ihr seid verfluchte hunde! "You are cursed dogs!" White Americans should be proud of their ancestors who resisted Roman conquest.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fuUnd9Db6Hg

    In actuality, the Roman Empire survived for another 284 years.
    That's completely false. Roman Empire survived for another 1261 years after Commodus.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Empire

    But you deliberate obfuscate that because the modern lands of the Eastern empire are full of brown people that you want keep out of Europe right?

    Replies: @BB753, @Peter Akuleyev, @Dmon, @Wokechoke, @Dutch Boy, @anon, @Odyssey, @anon

    White Americans should be proud of their ancestors who resisted Roman conquest.

    Even Americans of German descent are probably mostly descended from Roman subjects. During the Völkerwandlung German tribes conquered local Romanized populations but didn’t fully replace them. And most German Americans come from the Rhineland and Southwest Germany – areas which did not resist Roman conquest.

    It’s also not really clear what relation the tribes wandering around Europe in the 5th century AD had, if any, to the Germanii who fought the Romans in the Teutoburg forest. Those “Germanii” may have even been Celtic speakers. When the Goths showed up, who we know for a fact spoke a Germanic language, the Romans did not consider them to be “Germanii”. But Romans were not great linguists, to be fair.

    •�Replies: @Hapalong Cassidy
    @Peter Akuleyev

    The original homeland of the Germanic people (or “urheimat” as linguists call it) was southern Scandinavia. They spread out from there to the rest of the continent. The pagan Vikings were the last “pulse” of Germanic invaders to come out of that territory. Even their Germanic blood became diluted over time, as many of the Vikings brought wives from their conquests abroad back to the homeland. Even today, I think you will find that most Swedes have a little bit of Slavic ancestry, while most Norwegians have a bit of Celtic ancestry.
    , @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    @Peter Akuleyev

    Foundational Americans are predominantly Protestants. Are Rhineland, Southwest Germany and other areas that were under Roman control, predominantly Protestant?

    Gladiator falsely depicted the Emperor Marcus Aurelius, as having conquered "last of the Germans". When in reality he failed to annex north of the Danube:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcomannic_Wars

    Those defeats and struggles inspired the philosopher king's timeless work on Stoic philosophy:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meditations

    the Germanii who fought the Romans in the Teutoburg forest.
    And the chieftain of that battle became the symbol of German nationalism, of liberation against rapacious Roman invaders, didn't he?

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/ba/Hermannsdenkmal_statue.jpg

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arminius

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Peter Akuleyev, @Reg Cæsar
  19. @songbird
    Was honestly surprised by the gay Denzel stuff.

    Hasn't the way movies are being financed changed dramatically? Hasn't the road to success for big budget movies become more difficult?

    I would have thought that would make the investors turn against any woke stuff. If you were one investor, out ot many financial partners, wouldn't you demand no woke stuff? Wouldn't it only take one?

    Replies: @TWS, @EdwardM

    Perhaps but who knows how many years the film has been in development. Let’s see what movies look like five years from now.

  20. @EFG
    Should Denzel Washington have played the bad guy in Gladiator II?

    Eh, I'm not sure.

    First of all, I haven't seen the movie. So, is Denzel playing something like the Emperor of Rome? Or a slave gladiator?

    The first role seem very dubious.

    The second seems plausible, if unlikely/unusual.

    Replies: @Jonathan Mason, @Corpse Tooth, @MarcusInTier

    First of all, I haven’t seen the movie. So, is Denzel playing something like the Emperor of Rome? Or a slave gladiator?

    He thought he was being signed up for a remake of “The Graduate”, but it was only when he arrived at rehearsals that he discovered he was in a sword and sandals epic in which he would be required to wear a miniskirt without panties. Being a consummate pro, he just got on with the job.

    •�LOL: bomag
    •�Replies: @J.Ross
    @Jonathan Mason

    Very, very nice, at first I thought I was reading Kaganovitch.
    , @BB753
    @Jonathan Mason

    Yet Denzel wasn't totally on board with the gay kiss scene.
    https://people.com/ridley-scott-says-denzel-washington-acted-same-sex-kiss-gladiator-ii-didnt-happen-8747771

    Replies: @Old Prude
  21. Speaking of the changing norms of believable casting, despite constant internet grumblings that “only trans actors should play trans characters”, my streaming platforms recommended me the 2021 movie “Together Together” in which an ex-man plays… a biologically female pregnancy surrogate. (It’s still characterized as a “gay-themed” film.)

  22. Mister Gallagher,
    Oh, Mister Gallagher,
    I wonder what you think of Tulsi Gabbard?
    I think she’s kind of cute,
    And I envy the galoot
    Who gets to put the sword into her scabbard.

    Mister Shean,
    Oh, Mister Shean,
    I’m afraid her cheeks are better left unseen.
    The Noriega-like complexion
    Would dampen my affection.

    From behind, Mister Gallagher?

    I wouldn’t mind, Mister Shean.

    •�LOL: Mike Tre, J.Ross, SafeNow
  23. @Renard
    Like most American museums, the Metropolitan has been terminally woke for decades now, with very few exceptions.

    The Met Museum’s current show about African-American infatuation with ancient Egypt is embarrassing because it lacks the guts to mention that blacks didn’t have much to do with Egypt’s artistic accomplishments.
    Ancient Egyptian accounts are actually consistent and specific about distinguishing themselves from the "Nubians" upriver. Some were brought downriver from time to time.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon

    Not only that, but they apparently divided them into “red” and “black” Nubians.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nubians#History

    Still, Disney is “reimagining” the 1980s to some effect. Walt Disney is rotating at 3,600 rpm.

    •�Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
    @YetAnotherAnon

    The black girl in the picture is written in the original book as having "clear olive skin", but I don't think Ms Cooper had black olives in mind.

    And in the book the character, Cameron Cook, also rips into PC/wokeness. We are discussing TV shows:

    "I think it could be a good idea if you introduced a black unmarried mother into the cottage of the agricultural students, to appeal to the regulator"

    "Black unmarried mothers don't become agricultural students"

    "Well, she could be the girlfriend of one of the boys"

    "For Chrissake, why not have a gay shepherdess with one leg?"
    You'll note that Jilly Cooper ain't no Jane Austen.
    , @Jim Don Bob
    @YetAnotherAnon

    No matter how much I might otherwise be interested in a show/movie, woke crap like that turns me off completely and I refuse to watch.
  24. “Hotep is back!” says the NYC Met.

    I suppose this homage to Kamala was planned before Kamala’s flop.

    The actual Egyptians won’t be happy.

  25. @Peter Akuleyev
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    White Americans should be proud of their ancestors who resisted Roman conquest.

    Even Americans of German descent are probably mostly descended from Roman subjects. During the Völkerwandlung German tribes conquered local Romanized populations but didn't fully replace them. And most German Americans come from the Rhineland and Southwest Germany - areas which did not resist Roman conquest.

    It's also not really clear what relation the tribes wandering around Europe in the 5th century AD had, if any, to the Germanii who fought the Romans in the Teutoburg forest. Those "Germanii" may have even been Celtic speakers. When the Goths showed up, who we know for a fact spoke a Germanic language, the Romans did not consider them to be "Germanii". But Romans were not great linguists, to be fair.

    Replies: @Hapalong Cassidy, @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    The original homeland of the Germanic people (or “urheimat” as linguists call it) was southern Scandinavia. They spread out from there to the rest of the continent. The pagan Vikings were the last “pulse” of Germanic invaders to come out of that territory. Even their Germanic blood became diluted over time, as many of the Vikings brought wives from their conquests abroad back to the homeland. Even today, I think you will find that most Swedes have a little bit of Slavic ancestry, while most Norwegians have a bit of Celtic ancestry.

  26. Without having seen Gladiator II yet, I’d respond that casting Denzel is fine:

    Disagree. Ok it’s not as offensive air dropping blacks into Victorian costume drama. Still stupid and annoying.

    Someone who looks like Denzel–at least as he did 30 years ago–would be an oddity as gladiator, a “circus freak” for entertainment. But as someone wealthy and playing power politics in Rome–non-existent, ahistorical–and hence annoying.

    And the producers seem blind to the reality that the rest of the world has not been fully pickled (yet) and does not share America’s “must have blacks!” Stockholm syndrome style brain disorder.

    As a kid, I thought the West, the world was very fortunate to have America as the big winner of the War and the superpower of the post-War world. But since the coup, we’ve become just a big sewer pipe flushing garbage culture, abject stupidity (“race does not exist”, “racism!”, “diversity!”, “you go girl”, homos, trans …) and absolutely toxic minoritarian ideology out to the rest of the world.

    The further a nation is from the English language and American culture, the better its chances. If
    you want your nation to survive, itself, cut yourself off from the big sewer pipe spewing our ridiculous, toxic shit your way.

    •�Disagree: Corvinus
    •�Thanks: Gallatin
    •�Replies: @Hail
    @AnotherDad


    America’s “must have blacks!” Stockholm syndrome style brain disorder.
    I call it:

    "Black Moral-Superiority Doctrine."
  27. @AnotherDad

    Without having seen Gladiator II yet, I’d respond that casting Denzel is fine:
    Disagree. Ok it's not as offensive air dropping blacks into Victorian costume drama. Still stupid and annoying.

    Someone who looks like Denzel--at least as he did 30 years ago--would be an oddity as gladiator, a "circus freak" for entertainment. But as someone wealthy and playing power politics in Rome--non-existent, ahistorical--and hence annoying.

    And the producers seem blind to the reality that the rest of the world has not been fully pickled (yet) and does not share America's "must have blacks!" Stockholm syndrome style brain disorder.

    As a kid, I thought the West, the world was very fortunate to have America as the big winner of the War and the superpower of the post-War world. But since the coup, we've become just a big sewer pipe flushing garbage culture, abject stupidity ("race does not exist", "racism!", "diversity!", "you go girl", homos, trans ...) and absolutely toxic minoritarian ideology out to the rest of the world.

    The further a nation is from the English language and American culture, the better its chances. If
    you want your nation to survive, itself, cut yourself off from the big sewer pipe spewing our ridiculous, toxic shit your way.

    Replies: @Hail

    America’s “must have blacks!” Stockholm syndrome style brain disorder.

    I call it:

    “Black Moral-Superiority Doctrine.”

  28. Egypt was black (Kushite) — after it had already been Egypt for thousands of years, and in what was regarded as a come-down, something like Rome becoming German or China becoming Qing — and they were eventually driven out. Also, Thomas Jefferson never had a child with Sally Hemmings.

    •�Replies: @guest007
    @J.Ross

    What is the basis of the claim on Thomas Jefferson?

    Replies: @J.Ross
  29. @Jonathan Mason
    @EFG


    First of all, I haven’t seen the movie. So, is Denzel playing something like the Emperor of Rome? Or a slave gladiator?
    He thought he was being signed up for a remake of "The Graduate", but it was only when he arrived at rehearsals that he discovered he was in a sword and sandals epic in which he would be required to wear a miniskirt without panties. Being a consummate pro, he just got on with the job.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @BB753

    Very, very nice, at first I thought I was reading Kaganovitch.

  30. Why would Ridley Scott feel the need to manufacture a fictional villain for his story when he has a perfectly real villain available – the Emperor Caracalla? I see from the imdb page that he is a character in the movie, but seemingly a secondary one. Caracalla was a real creep, even by the standards of Roman Emperors.

    I thought that Gladiator was a bloated, steaming load of crap. And nobody at the time seem to notice that it was largely ripped off from the 1964 epic The Fall of the Roman Empire. I’m sure that the sequel will be no better. So if Denzel Washington, however anachronistic his casting may be, can make the movie more entertaining, then good for him. He is a very entertaining actor, and as Steve pointed out, is good at playing bad guys.

    I find it strange that movies about Rome seem to focus almost entirely on Gladiators. They did other things too. It would be as if, 2,000 years in the future, all the movies (or whatever they have then) about 20th / 21st century America entirely revolved around pro Football.

    •�Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @Mr. Anon

    "I find it strange that movies about Rome seem to focus almost entirely on Gladiators."

    Aw, I bet you don't like movies about Turkish prisons, either.

    Call me when you sell your spec about Syrian architects and engineers building the aqueducts. I can just see the pitch meeting -- "It's The Fountainhead! But set in ancient Rome! So we can have gladiators too!"

    Replies: @Tex
    , @Jim Don Bob
    @Mr. Anon

    Romans also invented self healing concrete some of which is still standing 2000 years later. But it's hard to make a movie about concrete.

    https://news.mit.edu/2023/roman-concrete-durability-lime-casts-0106

    Replies: @muggles
    , @Jonathan Mason
    @Mr. Anon


    I find it strange that movies about Rome seem to focus almost entirely on Gladiators. They did other things too.
    I would certainly enjoy a movie about Rome's Samian pottery industry. I once found a piece that had the maker's thumbprint on the base.

    A movie could be made starring Washington, called The Last Potter Movie.
    , @Wokechoke
    @Mr. Anon

    Macrinus briefly suceeeded Caracalla. A half Roman half Arab emperor.

    Replies: @Rohirrimborn
  31. While I normally grit my teeth at this kind of thing, I have to admit that I like Denzel as an actor and I could probably buy him in this role. As a villain in Training Day he made the movie. Similarly, although I groaned at the House of the Dragon show to see the Velaryon family portrayed by blacks, the guy who plays the patriarch is actually a very good actor so I can sort of suspend my disbelief there…unfortunately, the black actors that play his legitimate and bastard children are not good, and the next season that will address their rise will be painful to watch.

    As for the Met, as I have commented before, blacks in America are desperate to have some kind of identity associated with past glory but don’t actually have one, which leads to absurdities like claiming they are the original Hebrews or Egyptians. To some extent I get it – virtually every other group here can claim ancestry with peoples who did something significant, and even the conquered natives are still revered as warriors which is why multiple military weapons systems are named after different tribes. It’s got to suck to be the one segment of the population without any of that going for you in popular lore or entertainment.

    Still, it shouldn’t be humored and the Met thing shows the white progressive fondness for head-patting blacks whenever possible, which ranks high on list of objectionable characteristics of that group – and there are many to choose from. It’s dishonest and makes a people who crave respect from broader society look pathetic.

    •�Thanks: Old Prude
    •�Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Arclight

    As Macrinus he’s not too far off. The oddly cast Caracalla could have been more Med looking.
    , @ScarletNumber
    @Arclight


    As a villain in Training Day he made the movie
    I agree, as did the Academy, as he won his second Best Actor award for this. This also refutes what Steve said in the linked article...

    due to pro-black racial favoritism, black actors don’t get hired as often as they should to play antagonists
  32. Does this mean we know where Steve spent this last week’s vacation from UR: field testing his theory about how easy it is to screw around with stuff on the bottom of the Baltic Sea? Rent a boat, hire a few divers, voila…

    https://www.newsweek.com/baltic-cable-sabotage-nato-1988689

    Chinese Ship Suspected of Undersea Cable Sabotage Detained in ‘NATO Lake’

    Should have used Ukrainians though. They have cloaking technology which allows them to move about the Baltic at will, completely undetected by the patrol ships, RPAs and satellites which could otherwise determine the sex of a minnow.

    •�LOL: Old Prude
  33. In opera, for instance, singing ability is far more important than visual authenticity

    Like when the part of a fragile waif dying of consumption is sung by a 200-lb. soprano.

    •�Replies: @Almost Missouri
    @prosa123


    a fragile waif dying of consumption is sung by a 200-lb. soprano.
    You saw that one too? A profusely sweating 200-lb. negress soprano.

    "It's the aesthetics, Stupid!"
    , @Bill Jones
    @prosa123


    Like when the part of a fragile waif dying of consumption is sung by a 200-lb. soprano.
    It's all relative:
    A Black Diva only weighing in at 200 could well be dying of consumption.
  34. OT — Some bits from Simplicius — the Bryansk strike was a waste of dwindling ATACMS and did no damage, which makes it just like the occasional and ineffective “deep strikes” Ukrainian bandits were already doing with drones — Russian missile strikes vastly outnumber these gestures and are rolling up irreplaceable infrastucture — winter is coming —

    Though Putin had to make some escalatory show [the updated nuclear policy], it’s more realistic to expect Russia not to react in any overt way until Trump’s term settles in. Putin is aware that an outgoing senile despot who doesn’t care if the world burns behind him may seek to start WWIII, and that Zelensky may see his final two months’ chance to provoke Russia into overreacting. As such, it’s best for Russia to do nothing, and continue grinding the offensives which are destroying Ukrainian lines everywhere.

    A couple months back, you may recall World Bank announced that as per their calculations, Russia had finally surpassed both Germany and Japan in GDP PPP. However, the official IMF and CIA figures still scoffed at this, with Russia trailing both countries on their counts. This allowed the popular narrative to be maintained that the World Bank figures were some kind of inaccurate fluke or anomaly.

    Well, the IMF has just done their latest report and has officially concluded that Russia has blown past both Germany and Japan as of 2024, and is now the number four economy in the world. And not only that, but the IMF has Russia in the lead by an even larger margin than World Bank. On top of which, the CIA also updated their numbers and likewise reflects Russia at the number four position.

    The neocons have failed in Iraq, they failed in Afghanistan, they ran away without a fight from the Houthis, they allowed October 7th to happen, they have utterly destroyed the Ukraine as was predicted, they have failed to steal Donbas mineral wealth, they have failed to weaken Russia, they have made Russia stronger by every measure, they have failed in Iran, they have damaged American prestige, they have not built up American war manufacturing as they promised they would, they failed to plan properly for any of these wars, and they have managed to damage our critical allies like Germany. There have never been bigger failures in the history of warfare than the neocons. For how much longer will we allow the neocons to fail?

    •�Thanks: anonymouseperson
  35. Anon[388] •�Disclaimer says:

    OT: I’ve been thinking about the difference between Democrats and Republicans. To piss of democrats, you have to make a steak out of one of their sacred cows. You have to say something negative about gays, women, blacks, or transgender prostitutes. To piss off Republicans, all you have to do is quote their leaders, in context. That’s all it takes to puncture their fantasies. Here’s Pete Hegseth:

    Simply put: if you don’t understand why Israel matters and why it is so central to the story of Western civilization—with America being its greatest manifestation—then you don’t live in history. America’s story is inextricably linked to Judeo-Christian history and the modern state of Israel. You can love America without loving Israel but that tells me your knowledge of the Bible and Western civilization is woefully incomplete

    Or here’s Dr. Oz supporting transing of very young children:

    The psychology is this:

    1. I want X and I think Trump will give it to me.
    2. He won’t give you X.
    3. Ok, I won’t get X. But I’m pissed off at you, libtard, for taking my fantasy away from me, and I will support Trump just to piss you off. I’m going to redouble my Trump support now.

    •�Replies: @William Badwhite
    @Anon

    Looks like John "John Johnson" Johnson forgot his handle

    Replies: @Corpse Tooth, @Reg Cæsar
    , @Wokechoke
    @Anon

    It’s Hesketh. Which would much more anglo.
  36. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    The Roman emperors looked like this.

    https://www.worldhistory.org/uploads/images/12993.jpg

    Caracalla in the film look closer to Denzel Washington than the actor who played him

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/33/Sundance_Film_Festival_2024_-_Fred_Hechinger-104A1882_%28cropped%29.jpg

    The original Gladiator began with the Romans fighting the Germanic barbarians, the ancestors to most white Americans.

    He says to Russell Crowe: Ihr seid verfluchte hunde! "You are cursed dogs!" White Americans should be proud of their ancestors who resisted Roman conquest.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fuUnd9Db6Hg

    In actuality, the Roman Empire survived for another 284 years.
    That's completely false. Roman Empire survived for another 1261 years after Commodus.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Empire

    But you deliberate obfuscate that because the modern lands of the Eastern empire are full of brown people that you want keep out of Europe right?

    Replies: @BB753, @Peter Akuleyev, @Dmon, @Wokechoke, @Dutch Boy, @anon, @Odyssey, @anon

    Wow – do you have the complete set of Topps Emperor Rookie cards? All I”ve been able to find is the commemorative reproduction set issued by Justinian in the 500’s, and they had replaced the official photographs with artists drawings then – Belisarius’s card makes him look like a Mexican cartel boss.

    •�LOL: kaganovitch, Rich
    •�Replies: @Odyssey
    @Dmon

    Emperor Justinian and his general Belisarius were Serbs.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Dmon
  37. @Almost Missouri

    In opera, for instance, singing ability is far more important than visual authenticity
    This is something of tradition going back to the 1960s starting IIRC with Jessye Norman. She was a pretty good singer, but unfortunately her success set off a hysterical competition among more recent opera producers to cast the The Next Jessye, or The First ______ [Asian or Queer or All-Black Cast or All-Female Production or whatever] Opera, which has led to some absurd and degraded opera, not only because even opera has limits on visual authenticity (there's a reason they spend plenty on set designers), but also because a lot of the people they use to mount these monstrosities don't actually sing that well. Hiring and promoting black singers with powerful pipes but no feeling for nuance is a particular bugbear.

    Denzel Washington, one of the great movie stars of his generation. (Check him out in 2012’s Flight for an example.)
    I suppose, but wasn't Flight just an affirmative action vehicle for Denzel, and by extension for blacks generally?

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Mike Tre

    “and promoting black singers with powerful pipes but no feeling for nuance”

    So like, in other words, pretty much all of them.

  38. @IHTG

    When the superb traditional Egyptian aesthetic, such as hieroglyphics, first emerged about 5,000 years ago, the population was largely descended from Caucasian farmers of the Fertile Crescent.
    The earliest Egyptians probably were darker-skinned than the Egyptians of Greco-Roman times, though.

    (In fact, many human populations are now known to have become lighter-skinned over the centuries, contrary to certain doom-pilled white nationalist historiographies about recessive genes and rising tides of color)

    Replies: @Jack D, @Santoculto

    There is a well known tomb painting from ancient Egypt (2000 BCE) showing a group of Canaanites visiting Egypt and bearing tribute to the deceased ruler. The Canaanites wear multi-colored clothing (see Joseph and his coat of may colors) and are distinctly lighter skinned/Caucasian looking) and the Egyptians are quite brown.

    •�Replies: @Prester John
    @Jack D

    Given that Egypt is a lot closer to the equator it would not surprise me if their skin color tended to be darker than their counterparts in, say, Scandanavia.

    Replies: @Jack D
  39. @Jonathan Mason
    @EFG


    First of all, I haven’t seen the movie. So, is Denzel playing something like the Emperor of Rome? Or a slave gladiator?
    He thought he was being signed up for a remake of "The Graduate", but it was only when he arrived at rehearsals that he discovered he was in a sword and sandals epic in which he would be required to wear a miniskirt without panties. Being a consummate pro, he just got on with the job.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @BB753
    •�Replies: @Old Prude
    @BB753

    “Gay kiss scene” Thanks for the warning.

    Gladiator had great fight scenes, and Crowe chewed up the role, (Are you not entertained?!!), but as story telling it was poorly done.
  40. There were plenty of Africans in Rome. Including rich ones. Just like there were plenty Indians. And Cappadocians. And even Chinese. It was Rome. All roads lead to it.

    •�Disagree: Rich
  41. @Peter Akuleyev
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    White Americans should be proud of their ancestors who resisted Roman conquest.

    Even Americans of German descent are probably mostly descended from Roman subjects. During the Völkerwandlung German tribes conquered local Romanized populations but didn't fully replace them. And most German Americans come from the Rhineland and Southwest Germany - areas which did not resist Roman conquest.

    It's also not really clear what relation the tribes wandering around Europe in the 5th century AD had, if any, to the Germanii who fought the Romans in the Teutoburg forest. Those "Germanii" may have even been Celtic speakers. When the Goths showed up, who we know for a fact spoke a Germanic language, the Romans did not consider them to be "Germanii". But Romans were not great linguists, to be fair.

    Replies: @Hapalong Cassidy, @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    Foundational Americans are predominantly Protestants. Are Rhineland, Southwest Germany and other areas that were under Roman control, predominantly Protestant?

    Gladiator falsely depicted the Emperor Marcus Aurelius, as having conquered “last of the Germans”. When in reality he failed to annex north of the Danube:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcomannic_Wars

    Those defeats and struggles inspired the philosopher king’s timeless work on Stoic philosophy:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meditations

    the Germanii who fought the Romans in the Teutoburg forest.

    And the chieftain of that battle became the symbol of German nationalism, of liberation against rapacious Roman invaders, didn’t he?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arminius

    •�Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms


    Are Rhineland, Southwest Germany and other areas that were under Roman control, predominantly Protestant?
    The Rhineland is the most Catholic part of Germany after Bavaria. The southwest, now the state of Baden-Württemberg, is split almost evenly between Catholic, Protestant, and other, with 6% being Moslem.

    It was not uncommon though, especially in the earlier centuries, for immigrants to America to come from a religious or ethnic minority in their part of the world. The Huguenots, for example. Frankenmuth, Michigan was founded by Bavarian Protestants. Slovaks and Czechs in the Upper Midwest are often Lutheran.

    I worked with a guy whose grandparents were immigrants, and at least two of his own grandchildren were not only 100% Swedish, but 100% Swedish Baptist. After four generations here. Sweden was not friendly to other faiths!

    However, most post-Civil War immigration consisted of members of the majority sect and tribe back home. They had just been born into the wrong class.
    , @Peter Akuleyev
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    And the chieftain of that battle became the symbol of German nationalism, of liberation against rapacious Roman invaders, didn’t he?

    A millenium after the fact based on some Germans reading Tacitus. No German folk memory of Arminius survived over the intervening centuries. There is no real evidence that any of the other German tribes saw Arminius as some sort of pan-Germanic hero even during the centuries immediately after the event.

    Replies: @Prester John, @anon, @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms, @Odyssey
    , @Reg Cæsar
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    We have our own monument to Hermann, in New Ulm (not in Hermann!) Dressed more warmly, naturally.




    https://www.roadsideamerica.com/story/11260


    https://www.roadsideamerica.com/attract/images/mn/MNNEWhermann2.jpg
  42. The existence of the Nile made north-south travel in northeast Africa easier than crossing the Sahara in parched northwest Africa… However, the impenetrable Sudd swamp on the upper Nile effectively blocked Mediterraneans from reaching the blackest parts of Africa by river.

    Much of the western Sahara was still verdant, wooded grassland, not long before the rise of Egypt.

    …from Caucasian farmers of the Fertile Crescent.

    Somehow, Caucasian seems a little off here. Though certainly closer to accurate than European or white. Pointy-headed, perhaps?-

    On the subject of pointy heads, our old friend, iSteve comment perennial Vermin Supreme, is back. Speculation abounds that the Biden family might have voted for Trump this year, to get back at their betrayers. (Who says Democrats don’t steal elections? They just stole one of their own!)

    They didn’t have to go that far. Vermin made it on the ballot in one state this year– Delaware. Joe and red-clad Jill may have given their vote to him instead. In 2012, at an alternative-to-Obama Democratic primary debate, Vermin glitter-bombed the other candidates, including Randall Terry. Terry was back on the presidential ballot in several other states, but not Delaware, so this particular October surprise was unavailable in 2024.

    You can register for your own government-issued pony at Vermin’s site.

    https://vermin2024.com/
    https://ballotpedia.org/Vermin_Supreme

    Vermin got a regular ballot line in Delaware, above RFK’s no less, while Jill Stein and Cornell West were reduced to “declared write-in candidate” status, along with President [sic] Boddie and Princess Khadijah Maryam Jacob-Fambro. Delaware evidently wouldn’t let President use his given name on the ballot.

    https://elections.delaware.gov/candidates/candidatelist/genl_fcddt_2024.shtml
    https://elections.delaware.gov/candidates/candidatelist/genl_wcddt_2024.shtml

  43. The number of years each region was part of the Roman Empire.

    Anatolia, the Levant and North Africa were more core Roman than NW Europe.

    There’s no shame in white Europeans for being on the peripherals of Roman civilization.

    For white Europeans to claim Roman heritage solely for themselves is completely shameless.

    •�LOL: Odyssey
    •�Replies: @Wokechoke
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    The core Roman population existed at the faultline between Gauls (today norther Italians) and Greeks (today southern Italians).

    Tuscany today would be a good match.


    Severus descends from Roman Equite colonists who settled in Libya. Caracalla had a Syrian Arab mom. He is the emperor who extended the citizenship to all free residents of the Empire. Typical sort of diversity hire action really. Rome really didn’t recover after that.
    , @BB753
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    That's because Western Europeans don't claim Eastern Roman Empire heritage. All those darker areas mark just that.

    Replies: @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    , @Corpse Tooth
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    Your map proves the Romans could never conquer the Picts!
    , @Thomm
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms


    For white Europeans to claim Roman heritage solely for themselves is completely shameless.
    Most white Europeans don't claim this. We have better things to do, and far more recent accomplishments to cite.

    What you have to recognize about White Trashionalism is that it is copium for the bottom 10% of white men (as rated by intelligence, looks, character, etc.). They feel cheated by God, because what is the point of being in the top group when they are in the bottom 10% of that group? Hence the need to say 'we' did all this, when they were not part of the 'we' in terms of any actual contribution.

    See here for more :

    https://www.unz.com/jcook/western-racism-laid-the-foundations-for-israels-genocide-in-gaza/#comment-6372831
    , @Coconuts
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    Sim, quem sabe porque os portugueses, os italianos, espanhois, romenos etc. vao sentirem-se mais ligados ao patrimonio romano do que os arabes ou turcofonos musulmanos?
    , @Pixo
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    That map is absurd. If the Byzantines are counted as Romans, then so too should the Holy Roman Empire. The Frankish and Visigothic states also were de facto successor states to Rome, adopting both its language and religion.

    Replies: @Dutch Boy, @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    , @Coconuts
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms


    For white Europeans to claim Roman heritage solely for themselves is completely shameless.
    As far as the Western half of the empire goes, Latin became the sacred language in much of Western Europe for a long time, until the 1960s for Catholic Europe. So that is ~1500 years when it was in daily use all over that area. Religion used to be more central in life and people were praying and reading in Latin all of the time, religious material but also surviving Roman authors. 

    And their religion was about how God became incarnate in the world in the time of Divus Augustus, and Christ acknowledged the political authority of Caesar. Dante wrote about how God blessed the Roman Empire in this way. 

    A large part of the population spoke languages derived from vulgar Latin in the rest of their life and were partly descended from Italian origin colonists who arrived during the time of the Roman Empire. They were still using Roman Law as one of their legal references, and writing philosophy, history and science in Latin until the 18th century.  

    The populations who didn't speak Latin derived languages tended to be influenced culturally by those who did. The ongoing presence of the Roman empire as a political reference point has already been mentioned in relation to Charlemagne. 

    We can compare that with the surviving Latin cultural legacy in North Africa and the Middle East, after the Arabs arrived with Islam and had been established for some centuries, or the Turks later on. Imo this is likely to be why, after a certain point in time, Western Europe became de facto the main carrier of the Latin Roman heritage. 

    In the East it would be centred on Greek speaking Christians and any remaining pagans. Since they have pratically gone by now from the Middle East and North Africa, this legacy has also ended up centred on Europe. Romanians are interesting in having a Latin derived language but Orthodox religion, so in some way they bridge the two spheres.

    Replies: @anon, @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    , @Ibero
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    All the Empire was Caucasian, regardless what Americans today call “white”;
    Only Egypt had some “diversity” in modern sense.
    If you put Irish, Germans, Armenians, Greeks, Hebrews, Turkish, Berbers/Arabs (old stock) in the same “movie”, you will not call this “diverse” in modern America (maybe even not if you ad some Huns…).
    Sim, Roman Empire was white/caucasian, but not in the “Anglo” meaning of the word.
  44. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    The Roman emperors looked like this.

    https://www.worldhistory.org/uploads/images/12993.jpg

    Caracalla in the film look closer to Denzel Washington than the actor who played him

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/33/Sundance_Film_Festival_2024_-_Fred_Hechinger-104A1882_%28cropped%29.jpg

    The original Gladiator began with the Romans fighting the Germanic barbarians, the ancestors to most white Americans.

    He says to Russell Crowe: Ihr seid verfluchte hunde! "You are cursed dogs!" White Americans should be proud of their ancestors who resisted Roman conquest.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fuUnd9Db6Hg

    In actuality, the Roman Empire survived for another 284 years.
    That's completely false. Roman Empire survived for another 1261 years after Commodus.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Empire

    But you deliberate obfuscate that because the modern lands of the Eastern empire are full of brown people that you want keep out of Europe right?

    Replies: @BB753, @Peter Akuleyev, @Dmon, @Wokechoke, @Dutch Boy, @anon, @Odyssey, @anon

    So they declined as the got blacked. Lol.

  45. @Arclight
    While I normally grit my teeth at this kind of thing, I have to admit that I like Denzel as an actor and I could probably buy him in this role. As a villain in Training Day he made the movie. Similarly, although I groaned at the House of the Dragon show to see the Velaryon family portrayed by blacks, the guy who plays the patriarch is actually a very good actor so I can sort of suspend my disbelief there...unfortunately, the black actors that play his legitimate and bastard children are not good, and the next season that will address their rise will be painful to watch.

    As for the Met, as I have commented before, blacks in America are desperate to have some kind of identity associated with past glory but don't actually have one, which leads to absurdities like claiming they are the original Hebrews or Egyptians. To some extent I get it - virtually every other group here can claim ancestry with peoples who did something significant, and even the conquered natives are still revered as warriors which is why multiple military weapons systems are named after different tribes. It's got to suck to be the one segment of the population without any of that going for you in popular lore or entertainment.

    Still, it shouldn't be humored and the Met thing shows the white progressive fondness for head-patting blacks whenever possible, which ranks high on list of objectionable characteristics of that group - and there are many to choose from. It's dishonest and makes a people who crave respect from broader society look pathetic.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @ScarletNumber

    As Macrinus he’s not too far off. The oddly cast Caracalla could have been more Med looking.

  46. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    The number of years each region was part of the Roman Empire.

    Anatolia, the Levant and North Africa were more core Roman than NW Europe.

    https://i.postimg.cc/rpPZWdVH/GIiv-Mqn-WMAA72-O3.jpg

    There's no shame in white Europeans for being on the peripherals of Roman civilization.

    For white Europeans to claim Roman heritage solely for themselves is completely shameless.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @BB753, @Corpse Tooth, @Thomm, @Coconuts, @Pixo, @Coconuts, @Ibero

    The core Roman population existed at the faultline between Gauls (today norther Italians) and Greeks (today southern Italians).

    Tuscany today would be a good match.

    Severus descends from Roman Equite colonists who settled in Libya. Caracalla had a Syrian Arab mom. He is the emperor who extended the citizenship to all free residents of the Empire. Typical sort of diversity hire action really. Rome really didn’t recover after that.

  47. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    The number of years each region was part of the Roman Empire.

    Anatolia, the Levant and North Africa were more core Roman than NW Europe.

    https://i.postimg.cc/rpPZWdVH/GIiv-Mqn-WMAA72-O3.jpg

    There's no shame in white Europeans for being on the peripherals of Roman civilization.

    For white Europeans to claim Roman heritage solely for themselves is completely shameless.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @BB753, @Corpse Tooth, @Thomm, @Coconuts, @Pixo, @Coconuts, @Ibero

    That’s because Western Europeans don’t claim Eastern Roman Empire heritage. All those darker areas mark just that.

    •�Replies: @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    @BB753

    What about Mother Russia? Its claim as successor to Rome is based on marriage to House of Eastern Roman emperors, and European laws of inheritance.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moscow,_third_Rome

    Are the Russian title Czar (cf. Caesar) illegitimate?

    Replies: @BB753
  48. @Peter Akuleyev
    @Hannah Katz

    Given that the average African American has 24% European ancestry (and educated affluent blacks probably have more than that), they should view Europe as an ancestral home. Most white American tourists to Spain and Portugual probably have as much Iberian ancestry as black Americans - almost none.

    If we could restrict tourism to Italy only to Americans with demonstrable Italian ancestry, Italy would be a far more pleasant country to visit.

    Replies: @kaganovitch, @anon, @PaceLaw

    If we could restrict tourism to Italy only to Americans with demonstrable Italian ancestry, Italy would be a far more pleasant country to visit.

    Right, it’s the American tourists that are the problem, not the African migrants.

    •�Replies: @Peter Akuleyev
    @kaganovitch

    My proposal would also prevent African migrants from coming, unless they have demonstrable Italian ancestry. Obviously.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @The Germ Theory of Disease, @AnotherDad
  49. @Hannah Katz
    Kind of like the black Vikings shown in movies. Go figure.

    We were on vacation in Spain and Portugal and noticed other American tourists, including African American tourists. I would think instead of visiting Europe they would visit the lands of their ancestors, like Nigeria and Ghana. Or maybe they avoid them for the same reason we do. Not much to see, unclean conditions, and the likelihood of getting mugged.

    Replies: @Peter Akuleyev, @jb, @Bill Jones

    Kind of like a TV show substituting a black woman for an actual historical Norse nobleman.

    Yes, Vikings Valhalla actually did that, and it made the show unwatchable for me, which is a shame, as Valhalla was a sequel to Vikings, which I thought was quite good. (Although it did get kind of woke towards the end, conjuring up entire armies of female warriors. Shieldmaidens do show up in the old sagas, and probably did at least occasionally see battle, but the show overdid it).

    •�Replies: @jb
    @jb

    Interesting. Unz garbled my link to a Reddit post on shieldmaidens by substituting "(dot)" for the dots in the URL. Looks like I can fix it in Click to Edit though.

    Replies: @jb
  50. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    @Peter Akuleyev

    Foundational Americans are predominantly Protestants. Are Rhineland, Southwest Germany and other areas that were under Roman control, predominantly Protestant?

    Gladiator falsely depicted the Emperor Marcus Aurelius, as having conquered "last of the Germans". When in reality he failed to annex north of the Danube:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcomannic_Wars

    Those defeats and struggles inspired the philosopher king's timeless work on Stoic philosophy:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meditations

    the Germanii who fought the Romans in the Teutoburg forest.
    And the chieftain of that battle became the symbol of German nationalism, of liberation against rapacious Roman invaders, didn't he?

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/ba/Hermannsdenkmal_statue.jpg

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arminius

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Peter Akuleyev, @Reg Cæsar

    Are Rhineland, Southwest Germany and other areas that were under Roman control, predominantly Protestant?

    The Rhineland is the most Catholic part of Germany after Bavaria. The southwest, now the state of Baden-Württemberg, is split almost evenly between Catholic, Protestant, and other, with 6% being Moslem.

    It was not uncommon though, especially in the earlier centuries, for immigrants to America to come from a religious or ethnic minority in their part of the world. The Huguenots, for example. Frankenmuth, Michigan was founded by Bavarian Protestants. Slovaks and Czechs in the Upper Midwest are often Lutheran.

    I worked with a guy whose grandparents were immigrants, and at least two of his own grandchildren were not only 100% Swedish, but 100% Swedish Baptist. After four generations here. Sweden was not friendly to other faiths!

    However, most post-Civil War immigration consisted of members of the majority sect and tribe back home. They had just been born into the wrong class.

  51. Denzel Washington is nearly 70 years old. Is he playing an old man? I hope he is not playing a gladiator, at that age.

  52. although there would’ve been hardly any blacks, at most those the normen would later call “bluemen”, the emperate/czardom was filled from all over the empire. so in this sense the roman empire wasn’t roman. the roman (soi-disant universal) church’s emperate has not had such representative diversity and so is roman, italian. sad.

  53. We can all be grateful that Ancient Egypt and Ancient Rome didn’t have Antifa around to destroy all those statues they left us. We can see how these people depicted themselves in statuary. If they had Antifa, we could not have done that.

  54. @EFG
    Should Denzel Washington have played the bad guy in Gladiator II?

    Eh, I'm not sure.

    First of all, I haven't seen the movie. So, is Denzel playing something like the Emperor of Rome? Or a slave gladiator?

    The first role seem very dubious.

    The second seems plausible, if unlikely/unusual.

    Replies: @Jonathan Mason, @Corpse Tooth, @MarcusInTier

    Denzel’s role in this sequel appears to mirror Proximo from the original film, a gladiator trainer portrayed by Oliver Reed. It’s sad to see Ridley, in the twilight of his career, waste his waning energy on this desperate attempt by the Jewish homosexuals and crazy white women who run Tinsel Town for the asset management firms to greenlight a movie that might actually eek out a profit. The above-the-line talent that made the Industry rich and culturally relevant the past few decades are dying off. Sad. I was hoping to interest Ridley in my brother’s spec script, Bomb Cyclone! It could’ve led to a rebirth of the Disaster movie. But who would fill out the roster of stars that made those 70s pics so much fun. Sad.

  55. @jb
    @Hannah Katz

    Kind of like a TV show substituting a black woman for an actual historical Norse nobleman.

    Yes, Vikings Valhalla actually did that, and it made the show unwatchable for me, which is a shame, as Valhalla was a sequel to Vikings, which I thought was quite good. (Although it did get kind of woke towards the end, conjuring up entire armies of female warriors. Shieldmaidens do show up in the old sagas, and probably did at least occasionally see battle, but the show overdid it).

    Replies: @jb

    Interesting. Unz garbled my link to a Reddit post on shieldmaidens by substituting “(dot)” for the dots in the URL. Looks like I can fix it in Click to Edit though.

    •�Replies: @jb
    @jb

    Nope, got garbled again. You're going to have to fix it yourself.
  56. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    The number of years each region was part of the Roman Empire.

    Anatolia, the Levant and North Africa were more core Roman than NW Europe.

    https://i.postimg.cc/rpPZWdVH/GIiv-Mqn-WMAA72-O3.jpg

    There's no shame in white Europeans for being on the peripherals of Roman civilization.

    For white Europeans to claim Roman heritage solely for themselves is completely shameless.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @BB753, @Corpse Tooth, @Thomm, @Coconuts, @Pixo, @Coconuts, @Ibero

    Your map proves the Romans could never conquer the Picts!

  57. @jb
    @jb

    Interesting. Unz garbled my link to a Reddit post on shieldmaidens by substituting "(dot)" for the dots in the URL. Looks like I can fix it in Click to Edit though.

    Replies: @jb

    Nope, got garbled again. You’re going to have to fix it yourself.

  58. Is it historically accurate to cast a black villain in the Roman Empire?

    I don’t think Shakespeare had much concern with historical accuracy, but he did set Titus Andronicus in the Roman Empire, and made its most villainous villain, Aaron, a blackamoor.

  59. @prosa123
    In opera, for instance, singing ability is far more important than visual authenticity

    Like when the part of a fragile waif dying of consumption is sung by a 200-lb. soprano.

    Replies: @Almost Missouri, @Bill Jones

    a fragile waif dying of consumption is sung by a 200-lb. soprano.

    You saw that one too? A profusely sweating 200-lb. negress soprano.

    “It’s the aesthetics, Stupid!”

  60. People with WN inclinations should give far more reverence and gratitude to the one creature that kept blacks on the other side of the Sahara.

    If not for this one species, blacks would have migrated northward on the Nile, spread along the far more hospitable Mediterranean coast of Africa by 2000 BC, and since the M. Sea has weak tides and short distances between land, blacks would have migrated across the Levant and Turkey to the European coast, and taken over the good-weather land in what is now Spain, Southern France, Italy, Croatia, Greece, etc. by no later than 1400 BC. Even if Blacks chose not to go further north than Central France due to cold winters, their presence in Southern Europe from 1400 BC onwards would have precluded the formation of Greek and Roman societies. This would have prevented Western Civ outright, since Northern Europe might not have advanced without Greece and Rome having existed for a long time first. The Vikings, Goths, and Kievan Rus might have been the high points of white society, after which the Mongols would have come over to take over Kievan Rus as well as purge blacks from Europe. So Europe today would be Mongol.

    So, what is this noble creature to which Western Civ owes its gratitude?

    The Nile Crocodile.

    See the range of the Nile Crocodile (per Wikipedia) :

    It clearly kept blacks bottled up in Sub-Saharan Africa by preventing them from migrating northward (downstream) on the Nile. It is a large, aggressive, and dangerous creature that happily eats humans.

    WN wiggers need to express more gratitude to the Nile Crocodile. Fortunately, one of the last of the classical National Geographic wildlife specials from 1995 was titled ‘Last Feast of the Crocodiles’. It is very good, and features the legendary NatGeo theme music with trumpets and drums in their full glory :

    Lest you think the Nile Crocodile is just a counterpart to our own American Alligators, this video reveals how much larger the Nile Crocodile is :

    Hence, WN beliefs require veneration of the Nile Crocodile, and the NatGeo special should be seen as religious material for WN wiggers.

    •�Troll: Lurker
    •�Replies: @jb
    @Thomm

    This is a very silly comment. The "hospitable Mediterranean coast of Africa" was fully occupied well before 2000BC, and the inhabitants were quite capable of repelling invaders from the south. Beyond that, crocodiles didn't stop the Egyptians from navigating the Nile, did they? Not a very effective barrier! And why would you need crocodiles when you have a much more effective barrier: the Sudd?

    Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Trinity
    @Thomm

    This is AT LEAST the second time you posted this 🐊 story.
    Yes, thank you for telling all of us that the Nile crocodiles are larger than American alligators. Damn, we had no idea 🥴. Lol. I have heard of some gators about 14 feet, no idea of weight, still significantly smaller than large crocodiles but would be about average for a average crocodile.

    Okay, Jim Fowler, R.I.P ( my GP was related to Jungle Jim) let’s have an Animal Face-Off

    Hippo vs. Rhino ?
    Who wins?

    Replies: @Isabel Archer
    , @Anonymous
    @Thomm

    Pure garbage.

    There is *ONE* and *ONE* reason only that black Africans are taking over Europe, crocodiles or no crocodiles: The existence of an Economist magazine whipped political class which has absolute monopoly political power in Europe which most earnestly *WANTS* black African immigration.
    , @Moshe Def
    @Thomm

    Thank you, Nile Crocodile. What a good boy.

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease
  61. @YetAnotherAnon
    @Renard

    Not only that, but they apparently divided them into "red" and "black" Nubians.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nubians#History

    Still, Disney is "reimagining" the 1980s to some effect. Walt Disney is rotating at 3,600 rpm.

    https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/11/18/10/92189629-14095709-image-a-3_1731924155483.jpg

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @Jim Don Bob

    The black girl in the picture is written in the original book as having “clear olive skin”, but I don’t think Ms Cooper had black olives in mind.

    And in the book the character, Cameron Cook, also rips into PC/wokeness. We are discussing TV shows:

    “I think it could be a good idea if you introduced a black unmarried mother into the cottage of the agricultural students, to appeal to the regulator”

    “Black unmarried mothers don’t become agricultural students”

    “Well, she could be the girlfriend of one of the boys”

    “For Chrissake, why not have a gay shepherdess with one leg?”

    You’ll note that Jilly Cooper ain’t no Jane Austen.

  62. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    The number of years each region was part of the Roman Empire.

    Anatolia, the Levant and North Africa were more core Roman than NW Europe.

    https://i.postimg.cc/rpPZWdVH/GIiv-Mqn-WMAA72-O3.jpg

    There's no shame in white Europeans for being on the peripherals of Roman civilization.

    For white Europeans to claim Roman heritage solely for themselves is completely shameless.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @BB753, @Corpse Tooth, @Thomm, @Coconuts, @Pixo, @Coconuts, @Ibero

    For white Europeans to claim Roman heritage solely for themselves is completely shameless.

    Most white Europeans don’t claim this. We have better things to do, and far more recent accomplishments to cite.

    What you have to recognize about White Trashionalism is that it is copium for the bottom 10% of white men (as rated by intelligence, looks, character, etc.). They feel cheated by God, because what is the point of being in the top group when they are in the bottom 10% of that group? Hence the need to say ‘we’ did all this, when they were not part of the ‘we’ in terms of any actual contribution.

    See here for more :

    https://www.unz.com/jcook/western-racism-laid-the-foundations-for-israels-genocide-in-gaza/#comment-6372831

  63. General Hannibal Barca:

    •�LOL: TWS, anonymouseperson
    •�Replies: @obwandiyag
    @Truth

    Nah. Tanit.
  64. @kaganovitch
    @Peter Akuleyev


    If we could restrict tourism to Italy only to Americans with demonstrable Italian ancestry, Italy would be a far more pleasant country to visit.
    Right, it's the American tourists that are the problem, not the African migrants.

    Replies: @Peter Akuleyev

    My proposal would also prevent African migrants from coming, unless they have demonstrable Italian ancestry. Obviously.

    •�Replies: @J.Ross
    @Peter Akuleyev

    Late add? It doesn't say that up there.
    , @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @Peter Akuleyev

    "My proposal would also prevent African migrants from coming, unless they have demonstrable Italian ancestry."

    You don't understand how this works. Let's just say, for fun, that your sci-fi proposal is enacted. In that case, all African migrants simply claim Italian ancestry on arrival, they are merely coming to Italy to rejoin their families of old; they are assigned a court date and a formal procedure to investigate the validity of the claim. And then they either just never show up for the hearing and are free to roam about Italy causing mayhem forever, or else each individual investigation drags on for years, lining the pockets of unemployable "social historians" and so forth, and the Africans are still free to rape and plunder Italy as they please.

    Oh, and once this grift becomes known as a can't-lose play, the African invasion increases ninefold.

    As some wag once noted, The appeals process will always continue until the immigrant wins.
    , @AnotherDad
    @Peter Akuleyev


    My proposal would also prevent African migrants from coming, unless they have demonstrable Italian ancestry. Obviously.
    Nah your comment was just taking a whiny shot at core (GermanoCelt) Americans and parroting a current leftist trope of "over tourism". Basically to play up problems caused by "tourists"--white people--and downplay/ignore the real problems caused by immigrants--non-white people.

    Of course, tourists can be annoying as hell. (I try to behave and not be an "ugly American", but I've failed a time or two.) And the rising world prosperity has meant more and more "tourists" out and about with most of them going to a lot of the same places crowded the "hot spots"--the monuments, markets, museums, plazas and piazzas, cathedrals, restaurants, sidewalks, trails ... (You don't have to go to Italy or Barcelona. AnotherBrother and I were moving AnotherDaughter's car in 2021 and drove through Yellowstone--we were not alone. Or try Yosemite on any nice summer day. LOL.)

    But tourists ... go back home. You can easily regulate their numbers with visas, permits, hotel taxes, admission fees, etc. etc. The reason they're around at all is lots of people make money off of them. Tourists provide "free money" a city/region/nation doesn't have to come up with by trading something people actually want--wheat, maize, lumber, oil, gas, steel, autos, airplanes, electronics, ships, software ...

    Immigrants in contrast, do not go home. The problems they bring are permanent. They leave their genes behind to keep those issues and conflicts going forever.
  65. a black villain

    Now, now. It’s “justice-impacted individual”.

  66. @Peter Akuleyev
    @kaganovitch

    My proposal would also prevent African migrants from coming, unless they have demonstrable Italian ancestry. Obviously.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @The Germ Theory of Disease, @AnotherDad

    Late add? It doesn’t say that up there.

  67. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    @Peter Akuleyev

    Foundational Americans are predominantly Protestants. Are Rhineland, Southwest Germany and other areas that were under Roman control, predominantly Protestant?

    Gladiator falsely depicted the Emperor Marcus Aurelius, as having conquered "last of the Germans". When in reality he failed to annex north of the Danube:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcomannic_Wars

    Those defeats and struggles inspired the philosopher king's timeless work on Stoic philosophy:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meditations

    the Germanii who fought the Romans in the Teutoburg forest.
    And the chieftain of that battle became the symbol of German nationalism, of liberation against rapacious Roman invaders, didn't he?

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/ba/Hermannsdenkmal_statue.jpg

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arminius

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Peter Akuleyev, @Reg Cæsar

    And the chieftain of that battle became the symbol of German nationalism, of liberation against rapacious Roman invaders, didn’t he?

    A millenium after the fact based on some Germans reading Tacitus. No German folk memory of Arminius survived over the intervening centuries. There is no real evidence that any of the other German tribes saw Arminius as some sort of pan-Germanic hero even during the centuries immediately after the event.

    •�Replies: @Prester John
    @Peter Akuleyev

    Arminius/Hermann didn't attain popularity until the mid to late 19th century, not surprisingly at a time when Germany was emerging as a nation-state (thanks to Bismarck) to challenge France and Great Britain.
    , @anon
    @Peter Akuleyev

    Interesting. Hochart, Fomenko and Laurent Guyenot have claimed that Tacitus works were "discovered" by a plagiarizer, which seems true, Poggio Bracciolini had the reputation, and for instance his work on Germany may have been written by a different person.
    , @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    @Peter Akuleyev

    What is your point? Is it not a fact that Germans permanently expelled Romans to west of Rhine after Teutoburg Forest (9 AD)?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJHnM_PqreE

    Is it not a fact that modern German nationalists were kanging "We defeated the Romans n shiet"?

    A millenium after the fact based on some Germans reading Tacitus.
    You are implying ancestors of NW Euros at the time of Tacitus were mostly illiterate. Yes that's true too.
    , @Odyssey
    @Peter Akuleyev


    When the Goths showed up, who we know for a fact spoke a Germanic language…
    Incorrect!

    No German folk memory of Arminius survived over the intervening centuries. There is no real evidence that any of the other German tribes saw Arminius as some sort of pan-Germanic hero even during the centuries immediately after the event.
    Why has no German folk memory of Arminius survived over the intervening centuries? Simply put, it is due to another instance of historical reinterpretation. Arminius belonged to the Cherusci tribe, which, according to Wikipedia, is described as a Germanic tribe that lived in the area of modern-day Hanover.

    This, however, is inaccurate. At that time, the so-called Germanic tribes did not inhabit present-day Germany. More precisely, while they can be classified as "Germanic," they are not the ancestors of modern Germans (except for a segment of assimilated Serbs). In the 18th century, Serbian was still spoken around Hanover.

    It is misleading that Tacitus' term Germani is almost universally equated with modern Germans. Such confusion persists because modern Germans lack a clear understanding of their history, including the details of their migration from Asia and the historical origins of the term Germani. This name, which some associate with the Serbs as ancient inhabitants of present-day Germany, has become a source of misinterpretation.

    This issue parallels a comment by Panzer Tre #305 regarding the Greeks. Similarly, the Greeks migrated to Europe (from the Middle East/Africa) and claimed lands from the native Serbs, who originally gave them their name—Greeks, a name Greeks have largely avoided using due to its slightly derogatory connotation.

    Wiki says:
    "The Cherusci were a Germanic tribe that inhabited parts of the plains and forests of northwestern Germania in the area of the Weser River and present-day Hanover during the first centuries BC and AD. Roman sources reported they considered themselves kin with other Irmino tribes."

    Historical maps depict Arminius' tribe, the Cherusci, surrounded by Serbian tribes, such as the Suebi (which Wikipedia also wrongly classifies as a Germanic tribe). The German province of Swabia even derives its name from the Suebi. Unfortunately, German historical narratives are riddled with distortions, and what is even more troubling is the apparent lack of remorse for such fabrications, often overshadowed by a certain arrogance.

    According to a late 8th c. source, Luneburg (in locum qui dicitur Hluini) was considered part of the great Serbian confederation centered in northeast Germania, the renowned Lutici of Luticiorum: Liunniburc quoque oppidum maximum Ottonis duds Saxonici, situm in confinio Saxonum et Luticiorum, 795. :

    https://www.unz.com/article/the-saddest-story-never-told/?showcomments#comment-6651779

    There are a few hundred Serbian toponyms, here is just one of them:
    Bavendorp (Lüneburg) — originated from Babin‘s dorf (Babin’s = Grandma’s, in Serbian). So, Bavendorp=Grandma’s village. Lol.

    HANOVER WENDLAND, VENEDICA GENS – As late as the 18th c. one could still hear Serb or Wend-Polab speech (diepolabischer spräche) or Wend Drevani speech (wendischer spräche Drawey) in the Duchy of Luneburg (in den luneburgischen Amtern Dannenburg, Lucho und Wustro), and in the Wendland known as Hanover Wendland or das Hannoversche Wendland (J.H. Schulze, Etwas über den Bezirk und namen des wendischen Pagus Drawn, 1795. O, Koch, Das Hannoverschen Wenderland der de Gau Drawehn, 1898. B. Wächter, Zur politischen Organization der Wendlandischen Slawen vom 8. bis 12.Jahrhundert, 1989)’

    NICHT WORT DIE DEUTSCHEN SPRACHE – Numerous 17th and early 18th century sources note that in some rural areas the sounds of German speech were seldom heard or understood: Die alten Leutte, weil sie Wendisch, verstehen nicht Wort die deutschen Sprache, will geschweigen den Catehchisimum, 1669.

    WENDEN, GOTTLOSEN – As some Church officials tended to equate German speech with God’s presence, there were even doubts as to God’s existence in Hannoversche Wendland: Von der in Wustrow, Luchow und anderer in orten gesessenen Wenden unvernunfTtigen gewohnheiten und gottlosen Leben, 1671.

    Replies: @anon
  68. OT — The UK is so concerned about the growing Russian menace that they have announced plans to scrap warships, helicopters, and drones, with the goal of saving half a billion pounds. Of course, later, when everything rebounds, y’know, they’ll just get newer stuff.
    https://news.sky.com/story/uk-to-scrap-warships-military-helicopters-and-fleet-of-drones-to-save-money-despite-threats-abroad-13257285

  69. OT:
    Russia’s mega gas pipeline to China complete – CCTV
    Construction of the East Route natural gas pipeline has been finalized, according to its operator

    https://www.rt.com/business/607946-russia-china-gas-pipeline/

  70. @Peter Akuleyev
    @kaganovitch

    My proposal would also prevent African migrants from coming, unless they have demonstrable Italian ancestry. Obviously.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @The Germ Theory of Disease, @AnotherDad

    “My proposal would also prevent African migrants from coming, unless they have demonstrable Italian ancestry.”

    You don’t understand how this works. Let’s just say, for fun, that your sci-fi proposal is enacted. In that case, all African migrants simply claim Italian ancestry on arrival, they are merely coming to Italy to rejoin their families of old; they are assigned a court date and a formal procedure to investigate the validity of the claim. And then they either just never show up for the hearing and are free to roam about Italy causing mayhem forever, or else each individual investigation drags on for years, lining the pockets of unemployable “social historians” and so forth, and the Africans are still free to rape and plunder Italy as they please.

    Oh, and once this grift becomes known as a can’t-lose play, the African invasion increases ninefold.

    As some wag once noted, The appeals process will always continue until the immigrant wins.

    •�Thanks: bomag
  71. I don’t see anything in the text to support that the eunuch in Acts was a “brownish Nubian.”

    The fact that he was studying Jewish texts (while serving as treasurer for Cush) would indicate he was a Hebrew…probably descended from the time of the exile, but that is speculation.

    I think the often missed point of this passage was that eunuchs were considered unclean under Jewish law and therefore barred from the temple. The fact that Christianity made no distinction between clean and unclean was a precursor for the gospel going out to the gentile world.

    The taking of the word to the gentiles through Cornelius was a monumental shift accompanied by Peter’s vison and the appearance of angels and the pouring out of the Holy Spirit. As well as an express reference to the identity of Cornelius as a gentile that was lacking in the episode with the eunuch:

    “And they of the circumcision which believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that on the Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost.”

  72. @the one they call Desanex

    For example, New Zealand Maori character actor Cliff Curtis can plausibly play Arabs and Mexicans. (Presumably, there are also Mexicans and Arabs who likewise can get by credibly as Maoris.)
    In the 1968 film The Shoes of the Fisherman, Mexican actor Anthony Quinn played a Russian pope. He spoke in a Hollywood all-purpose foreign accent, replacing ‘r’s with ‘l’s, as in “Chlist was clowned with thorns.” When told he couldn’t do something, he said “I want to tly.”

    Replies: @Rapparee, @anonymous

    I never get the girl; I always get the country”.

    -Anthony Quinn (purportedly).

  73. @Jack D
    @IHTG

    There is a well known tomb painting from ancient Egypt (2000 BCE) showing a group of Canaanites visiting Egypt and bearing tribute to the deceased ruler. The Canaanites wear multi-colored clothing (see Joseph and his coat of may colors) and are distinctly lighter skinned/Caucasian looking) and the Egyptians are quite brown.

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f4/Procession_of_the_Aamu%2C_Tomb_of_Khnumhotep_II_%28composite%29.jpg

    Replies: @Prester John

    Given that Egypt is a lot closer to the equator it would not surprise me if their skin color tended to be darker than their counterparts in, say, Scandanavia.

    •�Replies: @Jack D
    @Prester John

    You don't have to go all the way to Scandinavia. Levantine people are white or are least as white as Greeks or Italians.

    Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic, @anon
  74. @Peter Akuleyev
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    And the chieftain of that battle became the symbol of German nationalism, of liberation against rapacious Roman invaders, didn’t he?

    A millenium after the fact based on some Germans reading Tacitus. No German folk memory of Arminius survived over the intervening centuries. There is no real evidence that any of the other German tribes saw Arminius as some sort of pan-Germanic hero even during the centuries immediately after the event.

    Replies: @Prester John, @anon, @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms, @Odyssey

    Arminius/Hermann didn’t attain popularity until the mid to late 19th century, not surprisingly at a time when Germany was emerging as a nation-state (thanks to Bismarck) to challenge France and Great Britain.

  75. From the Dept. of Unintentionally Hilarious Headlines:

    Disillusioned by the Election, Some Black Women Are Deciding to Rest

    https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/19/well/black-women-harris-trump-election-rest.html

    I can only imagine the enormous struggle these black women must have gone thru in order to abate their natural inclination toward vigorous hard work.

    •�Thanks: Mark G.
    •�LOL: kaganovitch, Trinity, Rich
    •�Replies: @Mark G.
    @Jack D

    I watch lots of old movies. One of my friends once told me I know more about old movies than anyone else he has ever met. One thing common in those old movies, along with cartoons of the era, was to take Black laziness, lack of intelligence or tendency towards pompous behavior and exaggerate it for comic effect.

    You do not see Blacks portrayed that way anymore in movies but Blacks in real life still often display the characteristics that Whites laughed at in a less politically correct era. When Kamala tried to be profound in the recent presidential campaign but came up with her hilarious word salads it was hard, at least for me, not to laugh at her.

    A couple commenters here have expressed the opinion that we are past Peak Black. Hispanics and Asians do not share the same high opinion of Blacks that they have of themselves and these two groups are increasing in numbers in this country. The Democrats are going to have trouble in the future with their messaging that lack of Black achievement is due to racism. No racial group other than Blacks themselves believes that.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
    , @Isabel Archer
    @Jack D

    Unfortunately this NYT story linked to is behind a paywall.
    , @Colin Wright
    @Jack D


    From the Dept. of Unintentionally Hilarious Headlines:

    'Disillusioned by the Election, Some Black Women Are Deciding to Rest'
    It's striking how the establishment ignores reality to simply invent the minority they would prefer was there. The hard-working, politically conscious black woman. The Leftist, Rainbow Flag Hispanic.

    I go to Hawaii, and there you can even get a history of this nonsense. When we wanted the then-Hawaiians to be pious Christians, they were pious Christians. When (say, 1964) we wanted them to be sexy hula dancers, they were sexy hula dancers. Now that we want them to be aggrieved Polynesians, they're aggrieved Polynesians. Of course, they've never been exactly any of these things. These days, they're not even particularly Polynesian. It's in the mix, but...

    It would be funny if it weren't mildly tragic. Dunno about blacks, but both Hispanics and the 'locals' on Hawaii have real cultures. They're just somewhat stunted and malformed by our determined effort to force it into the molds we create for it.

    Take, for example, the 'wise Hispanic female' of Sotomayor. Nahh. In my experience (and it's fairly broad) Hispanic women are often neurotic, compulsive, and capable of self-destructive behavior fully as blatant as that of their white sisters.

    Sometimes, I think a lot of our problems stem from refusing to see what's actually there. I've had perfectly good workers who were fine -- until I tried to make them do things they couldn't.

    Like, calculate a bill. A Labrador Retriever's a mighty fine animal in most respects -- but don't ask it to be a serious attack dog. If for example we simply accepted who blacks actually were, wouldn't it work out better all round?
  76. Mel Gibson’s casting was in a sense a missed opportunity. In Passion on the Christ, Pilate’s Samnite origins could have been exploited. Additionally the Roman soldiers should have simply been local Jews joined up in the auxiliary cohorts raised by Pilate, seeking citizenship in exchange for policing their own. The conversations between Pilate and his men might have been
    Comical interactions of Aramaic/Greek speaking Jews in Roman like uniforms with a spivvy up and coming Italic chancer.

    No Roman legionary was ever stationed in Jerusalem. Until Titus came to burn it all down.

    •�Replies: @Goddard
    @Wokechoke

    Gibson’s Passion had much too much Latin dialogue. The Jews spoke Aramaic to each other, the Romans Greek.

    Replies: @Odyssey
  77. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    The number of years each region was part of the Roman Empire.

    Anatolia, the Levant and North Africa were more core Roman than NW Europe.

    https://i.postimg.cc/rpPZWdVH/GIiv-Mqn-WMAA72-O3.jpg

    There's no shame in white Europeans for being on the peripherals of Roman civilization.

    For white Europeans to claim Roman heritage solely for themselves is completely shameless.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @BB753, @Corpse Tooth, @Thomm, @Coconuts, @Pixo, @Coconuts, @Ibero

    Sim, quem sabe porque os portugueses, os italianos, espanhois, romenos etc. vao sentirem-se mais ligados ao patrimonio romano do que os arabes ou turcofonos musulmanos?

  78. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    The number of years each region was part of the Roman Empire.

    Anatolia, the Levant and North Africa were more core Roman than NW Europe.

    https://i.postimg.cc/rpPZWdVH/GIiv-Mqn-WMAA72-O3.jpg

    There's no shame in white Europeans for being on the peripherals of Roman civilization.

    For white Europeans to claim Roman heritage solely for themselves is completely shameless.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @BB753, @Corpse Tooth, @Thomm, @Coconuts, @Pixo, @Coconuts, @Ibero

    That map is absurd. If the Byzantines are counted as Romans, then so too should the Holy Roman Empire. The Frankish and Visigothic states also were de facto successor states to Rome, adopting both its language and religion.

    •�Agree: Bardon Kaldian
    •�Replies: @Dutch Boy
    @Pixo

    Byzantine is a term used by historians. The people termed Byzantine considered themselves Romans and were so considered by their enemies.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @anon, @Twinkie
    , @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    @Pixo

    Then why didn't Charlemagne claim the title of Western Roman Emperor?

    Because the barbarian regent Odoacer deposed the last Western child emperor and returned the Western regalia to Constantinope, thus recognizing authority of the East.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deposition_of_Romulus_Augustus

    Charlemagne claimed the title "Holy Roman Emperor", but he didn't have a claim to title Roman Emperor based on inheritance, and was not recognized by Constantinope and medieval Christians.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem_of_two_emperors

    By your logic, Russian, Serbian, Bulgarian Tsars, even Turkish sultans can also claim to be successors to Rome.
  79. @Almost Missouri

    In opera, for instance, singing ability is far more important than visual authenticity
    This is something of tradition going back to the 1960s starting IIRC with Jessye Norman. She was a pretty good singer, but unfortunately her success set off a hysterical competition among more recent opera producers to cast the The Next Jessye, or The First ______ [Asian or Queer or All-Black Cast or All-Female Production or whatever] Opera, which has led to some absurd and degraded opera, not only because even opera has limits on visual authenticity (there's a reason they spend plenty on set designers), but also because a lot of the people they use to mount these monstrosities don't actually sing that well. Hiring and promoting black singers with powerful pipes but no feeling for nuance is a particular bugbear.

    Denzel Washington, one of the great movie stars of his generation. (Check him out in 2012’s Flight for an example.)
    I suppose, but wasn't Flight just an affirmative action vehicle for Denzel, and by extension for blacks generally?

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Mike Tre

    Denzel Washington is a very mediocre actor; the extent of his range pretty much being how far the blackity-black dial gets turned up or down. Otherwise he’s the same guy in every film, and so many movies would have been better all around had a white lead been in his place (think Bruce Willis leading in Man on Fire, for example.)

    •�Agree: Old Prude
    •�Replies: @Twinkie
    @Mike Tre


    Denzel Washington is a very mediocre actor; the extent of his range pretty much being how far the blackity-black dial gets turned up or down. Otherwise he’s the same guy in every film, and so many movies would have been better all around had a white lead been in his place (think Bruce Willis leading in Man on Fire, for example.)
    Washington was excellent in films such as Glory, Crimson Tide and Training Day. But even good (or great) actors coast once they reach a certain age - see Robert De Niro or even Marlon Brando.

    Replies: @Mike Tre
    , @Truth
    @Mike Tre


    Otherwise he’s the same guy in every film,
    So where Clint Eastwood, John Wayne, and Ahh-Nold.

    "(think Bruce Willis leading in Man on Fire, for example."

    Now there's a thespian who makes me think "MacBeth at the Royal Shakespeare Teatre."
  80. @Jack D
    From the Dept. of Unintentionally Hilarious Headlines:


    Disillusioned by the Election, Some Black Women Are Deciding to Rest
    https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/19/well/black-women-harris-trump-election-rest.html

    I can only imagine the enormous struggle these black women must have gone thru in order to abate their natural inclination toward vigorous hard work.

    Replies: @Mark G., @Isabel Archer, @Colin Wright

    I watch lots of old movies. One of my friends once told me I know more about old movies than anyone else he has ever met. One thing common in those old movies, along with cartoons of the era, was to take Black laziness, lack of intelligence or tendency towards pompous behavior and exaggerate it for comic effect.

    You do not see Blacks portrayed that way anymore in movies but Blacks in real life still often display the characteristics that Whites laughed at in a less politically correct era. When Kamala tried to be profound in the recent presidential campaign but came up with her hilarious word salads it was hard, at least for me, not to laugh at her.

    A couple commenters here have expressed the opinion that we are past Peak Black. Hispanics and Asians do not share the same high opinion of Blacks that they have of themselves and these two groups are increasing in numbers in this country. The Democrats are going to have trouble in the future with their messaging that lack of Black achievement is due to racism. No racial group other than Blacks themselves believes that.

    •�Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
    @Mark G.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAEt-Ax41Y4

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqlD-eZm1ck

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  81. Blacks invented everything while the White man was living in caves, yo.

  82. @Prester John
    @Jack D

    Given that Egypt is a lot closer to the equator it would not surprise me if their skin color tended to be darker than their counterparts in, say, Scandanavia.

    Replies: @Jack D

    You don’t have to go all the way to Scandinavia. Levantine people are white or are least as white as Greeks or Italians.

    •�Agree: Prester John
    •�Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic
    @Jack D

    I know Syrians who could pass at the Rotary Club meetings in Des Moines.

    Replies: @Rohirrimborn
    , @anon
    @Jack D

    Well, Levantine people, as well as people from the Middle East broadly, did colonize the Mediterranean, Southern Europeans have significant ME ancestry.
  83. @Thomm
    People with WN inclinations should give far more reverence and gratitude to the one creature that kept blacks on the other side of the Sahara.

    If not for this one species, blacks would have migrated northward on the Nile, spread along the far more hospitable Mediterranean coast of Africa by 2000 BC, and since the M. Sea has weak tides and short distances between land, blacks would have migrated across the Levant and Turkey to the European coast, and taken over the good-weather land in what is now Spain, Southern France, Italy, Croatia, Greece, etc. by no later than 1400 BC. Even if Blacks chose not to go further north than Central France due to cold winters, their presence in Southern Europe from 1400 BC onwards would have precluded the formation of Greek and Roman societies. This would have prevented Western Civ outright, since Northern Europe might not have advanced without Greece and Rome having existed for a long time first. The Vikings, Goths, and Kievan Rus might have been the high points of white society, after which the Mongols would have come over to take over Kievan Rus as well as purge blacks from Europe. So Europe today would be Mongol.

    So, what is this noble creature to which Western Civ owes its gratitude?

    The Nile Crocodile.

    See the range of the Nile Crocodile (per Wikipedia) :

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/52/The_range_of_the_Nile_Crocodile.png

    It clearly kept blacks bottled up in Sub-Saharan Africa by preventing them from migrating northward (downstream) on the Nile. It is a large, aggressive, and dangerous creature that happily eats humans.

    WN wiggers need to express more gratitude to the Nile Crocodile. Fortunately, one of the last of the classical National Geographic wildlife specials from 1995 was titled ‘Last Feast of the Crocodiles’. It is very good, and features the legendary NatGeo theme music with trumpets and drums in their full glory :

    https://youtu.be/u6ufEnacPqw

    Lest you think the Nile Crocodile is just a counterpart to our own American Alligators, this video reveals how much larger the Nile Crocodile is :

    https://youtu.be/fRDSh01lrLg

    Hence, WN beliefs require veneration of the Nile Crocodile, and the NatGeo special should be seen as religious material for WN wiggers.

    https://youtu.be/MD53hwAN5DY

    Replies: @jb, @Trinity, @Anonymous, @Moshe Def

    This is a very silly comment. The “hospitable Mediterranean coast of Africa” was fully occupied well before 2000BC, and the inhabitants were quite capable of repelling invaders from the south. Beyond that, crocodiles didn’t stop the Egyptians from navigating the Nile, did they? Not a very effective barrier! And why would you need crocodiles when you have a much more effective barrier: the Sudd?

    •�Replies: @Anonymous
    @jb

    For whatever reason, Black Africans were never sea fearers - perhaps this is down to deep atavistic fears that often have a real hold on the African mind, taboos which cause a real mental paralysis, which are most often seen today in matters involving superstition. In short, the open sea held a real inhibiting terror for Africans. It is curious to note that Africans never sailed to the various Portuguese colonised islands lying relatively near to the west African coast. Neither did they reach Madagascar lying off the east African coast, which was settled by Micronesians, sailing from the other side of the world.
    So it is unlikely that black Africans would haver ever crossed the Mediterranean under their own volition.

    Replies: @Corvinus
  84. They actually did it – the premiere art museum of the United States, the Western Hemisphere, maybe the world – and one with an absolutely incredible and comprehensive Egypt wing – literally made a “We Wuz Kangz” exhibition and they expect everyone to take it seriously. Memes become reality. I know it takes a very long to make an exhibit like this, it wouldn’t surprise me that they started planning it in the heady days of summer 2020. It was aged and out of date before it started.

  85. @Arclight
    While I normally grit my teeth at this kind of thing, I have to admit that I like Denzel as an actor and I could probably buy him in this role. As a villain in Training Day he made the movie. Similarly, although I groaned at the House of the Dragon show to see the Velaryon family portrayed by blacks, the guy who plays the patriarch is actually a very good actor so I can sort of suspend my disbelief there...unfortunately, the black actors that play his legitimate and bastard children are not good, and the next season that will address their rise will be painful to watch.

    As for the Met, as I have commented before, blacks in America are desperate to have some kind of identity associated with past glory but don't actually have one, which leads to absurdities like claiming they are the original Hebrews or Egyptians. To some extent I get it - virtually every other group here can claim ancestry with peoples who did something significant, and even the conquered natives are still revered as warriors which is why multiple military weapons systems are named after different tribes. It's got to suck to be the one segment of the population without any of that going for you in popular lore or entertainment.

    Still, it shouldn't be humored and the Met thing shows the white progressive fondness for head-patting blacks whenever possible, which ranks high on list of objectionable characteristics of that group - and there are many to choose from. It's dishonest and makes a people who crave respect from broader society look pathetic.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @ScarletNumber

    As a villain in Training Day he made the movie

    I agree, as did the Academy, as he won his second Best Actor award for this. This also refutes what Steve said in the linked article…

    due to pro-black racial favoritism, black actors don’t get hired as often as they should to play antagonists

  86. Anonymous[237] •�Disclaimer says:

    Do we have say in who gets cast in these movies?

    All we can do is accept or reject, and this is part of a trend of blackening white history. As such, it must be rejected. Who cares about Washington’s status as a star? That’s supposed to make a difference?

    Even if he’s the villain, it’s part of the blackening. Making exceptions here and there cuz of X-reasons is weak. It must be rejected and condemned. The equivalent of this would be casting Shaka Zulu as some Irishman. (We understand many Irish want to be black, but it’s not the same thing.)
    Weakness must be rejected. Too much of the white spectrum on cultural issues ranges from fervent conformity to fashions to spineless prevarications about ‘gee, maybe they have a point’. No, they don’t.

    Also, there’s a difference between historical inaccuracy, the feature of just about all historical movies, and total fantasy. Braveheart may have little to do with history, but imagine if the Gibson role(or the villain’s role for that matter) went to some Arab, Hindu, or Chinese guy. That’s beyond inaccuracy. It’s pure fantasy.

    The article tries to be balanced and fair-minded but such is a totally wrong approach to the current madness. There were blacks in Ancient Rome, but the current trend is to put blacks in historically prestigious roles. Just as we can’t be fair-minded and go for ‘ambiguity’ with the tranny madness, we can’t make exceptions for the blackening of white history. Who wants to waste verbiage wondering if Bruce Jenner is a man or woman? No, he’s a man who’s nutty.

    Scott made a few decent movies and mostly garbage. Gladiator was garbage that appealed to trashy tastes. Hell with him.

    •�Thanks: Mike Tre
    •�Replies: @Jonathan Mason
    @Anonymous

    Black people watch movies. Black people want to see heroes (or villains) who look like them. It is that simple.

    For the same reason there are a lot of middle-aged female detectives on TV.

    Replies: @Ministry Of Tongues
  87. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    The Roman emperors looked like this.

    https://www.worldhistory.org/uploads/images/12993.jpg

    Caracalla in the film look closer to Denzel Washington than the actor who played him

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/33/Sundance_Film_Festival_2024_-_Fred_Hechinger-104A1882_%28cropped%29.jpg

    The original Gladiator began with the Romans fighting the Germanic barbarians, the ancestors to most white Americans.

    He says to Russell Crowe: Ihr seid verfluchte hunde! "You are cursed dogs!" White Americans should be proud of their ancestors who resisted Roman conquest.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fuUnd9Db6Hg

    In actuality, the Roman Empire survived for another 284 years.
    That's completely false. Roman Empire survived for another 1261 years after Commodus.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Empire

    But you deliberate obfuscate that because the modern lands of the Eastern empire are full of brown people that you want keep out of Europe right?

    Replies: @BB753, @Peter Akuleyev, @Dmon, @Wokechoke, @Dutch Boy, @anon, @Odyssey, @anon

    Present day Italians looked pretty white to me on my travels there. I think we Americans get an impression that Italians are quite swarthy because of the large numbers of Sicilians among them in America. We had a Sicilian guide from eastern Sicily (the Greek part, as she put it) who scoffed at “those Arabs” in Western Sicily.

    •�Replies: @anon
    @Dutch Boy

    Southern Italians on average have more Middle Eastern ancestry than African, and more from North Africa than from sub Saharan Africa, and Middle Easterners do look pretty white. Italians also cluster very close with Ashkenazi Jews who of course also do look white.

    Human genetic diversity in Italy and southern Europe generally is higher than in other regions of Europe. And Italy appears to be a zone of sharp differentiation over small distances. When compared to other populations, Italians do not cluster all together, but are distributed among European and Mediterranean people. Southern Italians show a higher similarity with Middle Eastern, North African and Southern Balkan populations than northern ones.

    And Sicily and many parts of Southern Italy have similar genetics.

    Replies: @Dutch Boy
  88. @Pixo
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    That map is absurd. If the Byzantines are counted as Romans, then so too should the Holy Roman Empire. The Frankish and Visigothic states also were de facto successor states to Rome, adopting both its language and religion.

    Replies: @Dutch Boy, @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    Byzantine is a term used by historians. The people termed Byzantine considered themselves Romans and were so considered by their enemies.

    •�Agree: Odyssey, Rich
    •�Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @Dutch Boy


    The people termed Byzantine considered themselves Romans...
    So there were two Roman Empires that lacked a Rome, one in the east and one in the north.

    https://www.azquotes.com/picture-quotes/quote-the-holy-roman-empire-is-neither-holy-nor-roman-nor-an-empire-voltaire-30-37-78.jpg

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Twinkie
    , @anon
    @Dutch Boy

    About Rome and its relation to Byzantine read the many very insightful articles by Laurent Guyenot and First Millennium Revisionist on unz.com.

    https://www.unz.com/article/how-long-was-the-first-millenium/

    https://www.unz.com/article/a-short-history-of-civilization/
    , @Twinkie
    @Dutch Boy


    Byzantine is a term used by historians. The people termed Byzantine considered themselves Romans and were so considered by their enemies.
    "The Byzantines" called themselves Romaioi, a term I always found amusing, it being "Romans" in Greek, rather than Latin.

    Replies: @anon, @Jonathan Mason, @Johann Ricke
  89. @Jack D
    @Prester John

    You don't have to go all the way to Scandinavia. Levantine people are white or are least as white as Greeks or Italians.

    Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic, @anon

    I know Syrians who could pass at the Rotary Club meetings in Des Moines.

    •�Replies: @Rohirrimborn
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    In the early eighties when I lived in Chicago I had a friend of Syrian ancestry. His grandparents arrived in the early 20th century. He resembled a Caddyshack Rodney Dangerfield. He actually knew the Syrian language a bit. Once we were out in downtown and a car of a recently arrived (from Syria) middle aged couple stopped and asked for directions. We couldn't help them and the woman complained to her husband in Syrian about dumb Americans. They were shocked and embarrassed when my buddy started talking Syrian to them. They were profusely apologetic and courteous after that.

    Replies: @Mike Tre, @kaganovitch
  90. @Mark G.
    @Jack D

    I watch lots of old movies. One of my friends once told me I know more about old movies than anyone else he has ever met. One thing common in those old movies, along with cartoons of the era, was to take Black laziness, lack of intelligence or tendency towards pompous behavior and exaggerate it for comic effect.

    You do not see Blacks portrayed that way anymore in movies but Blacks in real life still often display the characteristics that Whites laughed at in a less politically correct era. When Kamala tried to be profound in the recent presidential campaign but came up with her hilarious word salads it was hard, at least for me, not to laugh at her.

    A couple commenters here have expressed the opinion that we are past Peak Black. Hispanics and Asians do not share the same high opinion of Blacks that they have of themselves and these two groups are increasing in numbers in this country. The Democrats are going to have trouble in the future with their messaging that lack of Black achievement is due to racism. No racial group other than Blacks themselves believes that.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian

    •�Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @Bardon Kaldian

    There is a whole museum devoted to this stuff in Big Rapids, Michigan, on the campus of Ferris State University.


    Enjoy the virtual tour. Or just learn other neat stuff from their exhibits:

    Similar to how gun ownership was highly restricted for African Americans, the ownership of dogs was also regulated, for enslaved people and for free African Americans.

    In 1792, George Washington wrote a letter to his estate manager at Mount Vernon. In the letter, George Washington addressed some issues about dogs on the estate. Washington was very clear about his expectations about African Americans and their ownership of dogs. “It is not for any good purpose Negros raise, or keep dogs; but to aid them in their night robberies; for it is astonish to see the command under which their dogs are.” Washington also stated that if a “negro presumes under any pretence (sic) whatsoever, to preserve, or bring one into the family, that he shall be severely punished, and the dog hanged” (University of Virginia Press, n.d.).

    https://jimcrowmuseum.ferris.edu/question/2022/august.htm

    My uncle, who spent his career teaching in the state's public colleges, told me 40 years or so ago that Ferris had the reputaion of being the worst in the state. Doesn't sound like anything has changed. Indeed, they've doubled down-- the museum was founded after my uncle's passing.
  91. @Mr. Anon
    Why would Ridley Scott feel the need to manufacture a fictional villain for his story when he has a perfectly real villain available - the Emperor Caracalla? I see from the imdb page that he is a character in the movie, but seemingly a secondary one. Caracalla was a real creep, even by the standards of Roman Emperors.

    I thought that Gladiator was a bloated, steaming load of crap. And nobody at the time seem to notice that it was largely ripped off from the 1964 epic The Fall of the Roman Empire. I'm sure that the sequel will be no better. So if Denzel Washington, however anachronistic his casting may be, can make the movie more entertaining, then good for him. He is a very entertaining actor, and as Steve pointed out, is good at playing bad guys.

    I find it strange that movies about Rome seem to focus almost entirely on Gladiators. They did other things too. It would be as if, 2,000 years in the future, all the movies (or whatever they have then) about 20th / 21st century America entirely revolved around pro Football.

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Jim Don Bob, @Jonathan Mason, @Wokechoke

    “I find it strange that movies about Rome seem to focus almost entirely on Gladiators.”

    Aw, I bet you don’t like movies about Turkish prisons, either.

    Call me when you sell your spec about Syrian architects and engineers building the aqueducts. I can just see the pitch meeting — “It’s The Fountainhead! But set in ancient Rome! So we can have gladiators too!”

    •�LOL: Tex
    •�Replies: @Tex
    @The Germ Theory of Disease

    I like the occasional sword & sandal movie. So one night Mrs. Tex and me are watching some Hercules film where the strong man gets enslaved and put to work building a road. Sinister baddies want to make him a gladiator though. So we get several scenes where the slave boss is complaining that the road building will be behind schedule if they don't have Hercules. I tuned in for a peplum and got a lecture on project management!

    Replies: @muggles
  92. “dubious assertion that blacks are responsible for ancient Egypt’s artistic glories?”

    Flight into Egypt: Black Artists and Ancient Egypt, 1876–Now examines how Black artists and other cultural figures have engaged with ancient Egypt through visual art, sculpture, literature, music, scholarship, religion, politics, and performance. In a multisensory exploration of nearly 150 years of artistic and cultural production—from the 19th century to the Harlem Renaissance to the Black Arts Movement of the 1960s and 1970s to the present day—the exhibition includes nearly 200 works of art in a wide range of media.

    https://www.metmuseum.org/exhibitions/flight-into-egypt-black-artists-and-ancient-egypt-1876-now

    Not featured was the now deceased poet laurate of the State of New Jersey. After Baraka’s public reading [of Who Blew Up America], Governor McGreevey sought to remove Baraka from the poet laureate post. Baraka got cancelled in 2001! He’s like the first of the cancellation wave.

  93. It’s American blacks that have this ancient achievers complex. Brazilians, Colombia’s blacks, Africans,…. simply don’t care.

    •�Replies: @Anon
    @Bardon Kaldian

    I’ll fix this a bit… (((Those people))) in America who run the media have told blacks that they were ancient achievers, therefore they’ve developed a complex about it. Remove (((those people))) and the blacks in America simply wouldn’t care either.

    -Rooster

    Replies: @Jack D
  94. @Peter Akuleyev
    @Hannah Katz

    Given that the average African American has 24% European ancestry (and educated affluent blacks probably have more than that), they should view Europe as an ancestral home. Most white American tourists to Spain and Portugual probably have as much Iberian ancestry as black Americans - almost none.

    If we could restrict tourism to Italy only to Americans with demonstrable Italian ancestry, Italy would be a far more pleasant country to visit.

    Replies: @kaganovitch, @anon, @PaceLaw

    Human genetic diversity in southern Europe is higher than in other regions of Europe. Most American tourists, including black Americans, but except of course Native Americans, could claim some genetic relatedness to a place like Iberia.

  95. This all is American psychotic stuff.

    In French, Spanish, German, Polish, Russian, Japanese…cinema no one of “other” race would be allowed to play a person who is known, whether from history or from fictional universes, to belong to a well defined racial category as is the case with Europeans.

    Black in the role of Stalin? No.

    Japanese in the role of Bismarck? No.

    Asian Indian in the role of Robespierre? No.

    African black in the role of Turgenev’s Bazarov? No.

    American black in the role of Goethe’s Werther? No.

    One can make adaptations of some works to different racial-cultural ambient (Kurosawa did it with Shakespeare and Dostoevsky), but to put actors of visibly different races in “others’” roles is a form of madness and mental suicide.

    And even in the case of “a few could have been”, as with parts of the ancient Mediterranean, it is a sign of psychotic Negrolary & a pathological attitude towards one particular racial minority that all non-degenerate world finds uncomfortable to be around.

    •�Replies: @obwandiyag
    @Bardon Kaldian

    The English are crazy for it. Dickens. Austen. etc

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian, @Lurker
    , @Anonymous
    @Bardon Kaldian

    John Wayne played Genghis Khan in The Conqueror. The Swede Warner Oland and Anglo American Sidney Toller played Charlie Chan.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EHt0Pb8rkXU

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3FdoGvpcLw

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian, @Anonymous
    , @kaganovitch
    @Bardon Kaldian


    This all is American psychotic stuff.
    More like Anglophone psychosis. It's as bad or worse in the UK.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
  96. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    The Roman emperors looked like this.

    https://www.worldhistory.org/uploads/images/12993.jpg

    Caracalla in the film look closer to Denzel Washington than the actor who played him

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/33/Sundance_Film_Festival_2024_-_Fred_Hechinger-104A1882_%28cropped%29.jpg

    The original Gladiator began with the Romans fighting the Germanic barbarians, the ancestors to most white Americans.

    He says to Russell Crowe: Ihr seid verfluchte hunde! "You are cursed dogs!" White Americans should be proud of their ancestors who resisted Roman conquest.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fuUnd9Db6Hg

    In actuality, the Roman Empire survived for another 284 years.
    That's completely false. Roman Empire survived for another 1261 years after Commodus.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Empire

    But you deliberate obfuscate that because the modern lands of the Eastern empire are full of brown people that you want keep out of Europe right?

    Replies: @BB753, @Peter Akuleyev, @Dmon, @Wokechoke, @Dutch Boy, @anon, @Odyssey, @anon

    But how real was Roman Antiquity though?

    How much of what the film claims to know about Rome is real?

    Reading this article one gets the impression that we don’t really know much about it:

    https://www.unz.com/article/how-fake-is-roman-antiquity/

    •�Agree: Odyssey
    •�Replies: @David Davenport
    @anon

    How much of what the film claims to know about Rome is real?

    Reading this article one gets the impression that we don’t really know much about it:

    https://www.unz.com/article/how-fake-is-roman-antiquity/


    Maybe you shouldn't believe everything you read in unz.com.
  97. @Jack D
    @Prester John

    You don't have to go all the way to Scandinavia. Levantine people are white or are least as white as Greeks or Italians.

    Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic, @anon

    Well, Levantine people, as well as people from the Middle East broadly, did colonize the Mediterranean, Southern Europeans have significant ME ancestry.

  98. @Peter Akuleyev
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    And the chieftain of that battle became the symbol of German nationalism, of liberation against rapacious Roman invaders, didn’t he?

    A millenium after the fact based on some Germans reading Tacitus. No German folk memory of Arminius survived over the intervening centuries. There is no real evidence that any of the other German tribes saw Arminius as some sort of pan-Germanic hero even during the centuries immediately after the event.

    Replies: @Prester John, @anon, @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms, @Odyssey

    Interesting. Hochart, Fomenko and Laurent Guyenot have claimed that Tacitus works were “discovered” by a plagiarizer, which seems true, Poggio Bracciolini had the reputation, and for instance his work on Germany may have been written by a different person.

  99. Anonymous[349] •�Disclaimer says:

    Ethiopia (especially greater Ethiopia, including Eritria) makes sense for the convert. There was a lot of Jewish and Christian exchange across the lower part of the Red Sea. Just look at a map and it kind of makes sense. Many common plants, cultural features, etc. are found on the Horn of Africa and in South Arabia (Yemen). It actually makes total sense that the connection was via the Horn as opposed to going past the Cataracts.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Aksum

    It is also speculated that one of the influences on the Muslim religion (which if you don’t believe in God, is reasonable to assume that it emerged as a state religion based on modifying various aspects of previous religions) were Jewish and Christian communities from Africa, interacting with Arabia.

    —-

    Also for the guy who thought portages across Sinai were done, uh no.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canal_of_the_Pharaohs

  100. The United States Court of Appeals for the 10th circuit has ruled against a second amendment challenge to Colorado’s ban on selling firearms to young adults.

    William Kirk discusses four separate pieces of legislation that are kicking around the Michigan state capitol, all of which will significantly affect where and when you can carry a firearm.

  101. @BB753
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    That's because Western Europeans don't claim Eastern Roman Empire heritage. All those darker areas mark just that.

    Replies: @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    What about Mother Russia? Its claim as successor to Rome is based on marriage to House of Eastern Roman emperors, and European laws of inheritance.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moscow,_third_Rome

    Are the Russian title Czar (cf. Caesar) illegitimate?

    •�LOL: Odyssey
    •�Replies: @BB753
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    Eastern Europe is different. They do claim Byzantium. And they do not have hang-ups about "swarthy" Greeks. For cultural, political and religious reasons, Western Europeans look down on Byzantium. There was plenty of bad blood between Constantinople and the West, and not only because of the Crusades.

    Replies: @anon, @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
  102. @Truth
    General Hannibal Barca:

    https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-PSI6ERA5zfA/T_T_3Y231oI/AAAAAAAABOE/-qzGcWP7GIc/w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu/Hannibal.jpg

    Replies: @obwandiyag

    Nah. Tanit.

  103. •�Replies: @Old Prude
    @Joe Stalin

    Sorry, shooting down slow moving drones does not count as air to air combat any more than blowing up five trucks makes one an ace.

    Target practice against RC airplanes (with missiles no less!) is not anywhere near the neighborhood of being locked in deadly combat against Russian, German and Japanese pilots.

    With medal inflation, today's military probably sees it differently.

    Replies: @Felpudinho
    , @Old Prude
    @Joe Stalin

    From a cost-benefit analysis, the Iranians won this one. They lost 300 cheap drones and missiles. The Israelis and American probably shot off twice that number of expensive munitions and missiles, and that's not even counting the jet fuel and ancillary cost of the scramble.
  104. @Bardon Kaldian
    This all is American psychotic stuff.

    In French, Spanish, German, Polish, Russian, Japanese…cinema no one of “other” race would be allowed to play a person who is known, whether from history or from fictional universes, to belong to a well defined racial category as is the case with Europeans.

    Black in the role of Stalin? No.

    Japanese in the role of Bismarck? No.

    Asian Indian in the role of Robespierre? No.

    African black in the role of Turgenev’s Bazarov? No.

    American black in the role of Goethe’s Werther? No.

    One can make adaptations of some works to different racial-cultural ambient (Kurosawa did it with Shakespeare and Dostoevsky), but to put actors of visibly different races in “others’” roles is a form of madness and mental suicide.

    And even in the case of "a few could have been", as with parts of the ancient Mediterranean, it is a sign of psychotic Negrolary & a pathological attitude towards one particular racial minority that all non-degenerate world finds uncomfortable to be around.

    Replies: @obwandiyag, @Anonymous, @kaganovitch

    The English are crazy for it. Dickens. Austen. etc

    •�Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
    @obwandiyag

    Yeah, they're US copycats, that's why.
    , @Lurker
    @obwandiyag

    The people who hold media power are crazy for it. The British themselves are not crazy for it.

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease
  105. @Pixo
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    That map is absurd. If the Byzantines are counted as Romans, then so too should the Holy Roman Empire. The Frankish and Visigothic states also were de facto successor states to Rome, adopting both its language and religion.

    Replies: @Dutch Boy, @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    Then why didn’t Charlemagne claim the title of Western Roman Emperor?

    Because the barbarian regent Odoacer deposed the last Western child emperor and returned the Western regalia to Constantinope, thus recognizing authority of the East.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deposition_of_Romulus_Augustus

    Charlemagne claimed the title “Holy Roman Emperor”, but he didn’t have a claim to title Roman Emperor based on inheritance, and was not recognized by Constantinope and medieval Christians.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem_of_two_emperors

    By your logic, Russian, Serbian, Bulgarian Tsars, even Turkish sultans can also claim to be successors to Rome.

    •�LOL: Odyssey
  106. @Peter Akuleyev
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    And the chieftain of that battle became the symbol of German nationalism, of liberation against rapacious Roman invaders, didn’t he?

    A millenium after the fact based on some Germans reading Tacitus. No German folk memory of Arminius survived over the intervening centuries. There is no real evidence that any of the other German tribes saw Arminius as some sort of pan-Germanic hero even during the centuries immediately after the event.

    Replies: @Prester John, @anon, @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms, @Odyssey

    What is your point? Is it not a fact that Germans permanently expelled Romans to west of Rhine after Teutoburg Forest (9 AD)?

    Is it not a fact that modern German nationalists were kanging “We defeated the Romans n shiet”?

    A millenium after the fact based on some Germans reading Tacitus.

    You are implying ancestors of NW Euros at the time of Tacitus were mostly illiterate. Yes that’s true too.

  107. @Bardon Kaldian
    @Mark G.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAEt-Ax41Y4

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqlD-eZm1ck

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    There is a whole museum devoted to this stuff in Big Rapids, Michigan, on the campus of Ferris State University.

    Enjoy the virtual tour. Or just learn other neat stuff from their exhibits:

    Similar to how gun ownership was highly restricted for African Americans, the ownership of dogs was also regulated, for enslaved people and for free African Americans.

    In 1792, George Washington wrote a letter to his estate manager at Mount Vernon. In the letter, George Washington addressed some issues about dogs on the estate. Washington was very clear about his expectations about African Americans and their ownership of dogs. “It is not for any good purpose Negros raise, or keep dogs; but to aid them in their night robberies; for it is astonish to see the command under which their dogs are.” Washington also stated that if a “negro presumes under any pretence (sic) whatsoever, to preserve, or bring one into the family, that he shall be severely punished, and the dog hanged” (University of Virginia Press, n.d.).

    https://jimcrowmuseum.ferris.edu/question/2022/august.htm

    My uncle, who spent his career teaching in the state’s public colleges, told me 40 years or so ago that Ferris had the reputaion of being the worst in the state. Doesn’t sound like anything has changed. Indeed, they’ve doubled down– the museum was founded after my uncle’s passing.

  108. @Dutch Boy
    @Pixo

    Byzantine is a term used by historians. The people termed Byzantine considered themselves Romans and were so considered by their enemies.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @anon, @Twinkie

    The people termed Byzantine considered themselves Romans…

    So there were two Roman Empires that lacked a Rome, one in the east and one in the north.

    •�Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @Reg Cæsar

    Lately I've been reading Gore Vidal's novel "Julian" about Julian the Apostate, the last Roman Emperor who seriously tried to evict Christianity and re-install the old pagan gods. It's rather interesting for a lot of reasons, but it does get into elaborate detail about the zany power-sharing game of Twister that went on between the Western Emperor and the Eastern Emperor and all the kooky politics involved. Also the personal-life stuff is fascinating; I had thought that by that point, most educated Romans regarded the old pagan gods as metaphorical, not real; but Vidal has Julian say things like "I actually stood at the place where Persephone returned from Hades to the world above" apparently he believed it. WG Sebald once posed the thought experiment, "Who was the last person alive who actually, really believed in Zeus?" Whoever he was I guess he lived after Julian.

    Vidal is a lively, engaging writer and evidently he did his homework, so the novel is a pretty good portrait of what post-Constantine Rome/Byzantium was like, more fun than a history book and probably a lot more accurate than a book written by a Woke academic.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian, @Jonathan Mason
    , @Twinkie
    @Reg Cæsar


    So there were two Roman Empires that lacked a Rome, one in the east and one in the north.
    The Holy Roman Empire was actually: Heiliges Römisches Reich Deutscher Nation/Sacrum Imperium Romanum Nationis Germaniae - Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation.

    And Byzantion/Constantinopolis was the Second Rome, so... It was Roman.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  109. anonymous[133] •�Disclaimer says:

    OFF TOPIC:
    Minneapolis mayor, Jewish group want teachers union to cancel event with anti-Israel speaker

    A pro-Palestinian branch of the Minneapolis teachers union is holding a seminar Friday featuring Taher Herzallah. Mayor Jacob Frey and the JCRC are objecting, calling his remarks antisemitic.

    Deena Winter

    The Minnesota Star Tribune
    NOVEMBER 20TH AT 11:53 AM CST

    Mayor Jacob Frey and others are calling on the Minneapolis teachers union to cancel an upcoming seminar featuring a speaker who has openly expressed antisemitic views.

    Taher Herzallah is scheduled to speak at a Friday event called “being an educator in a time of war & genocide” at the Minneapolis Federation of Teachers Local 59 office. The event is sponsored by MFT Educators for Palestine.

    Frey, who is Jewish, said on social media Tuesday night that the group should cancel the seminar with Herzallah, who has called Jewish people “enemy number one.”

  110. @Peter Akuleyev
    @Hannah Katz

    Given that the average African American has 24% European ancestry (and educated affluent blacks probably have more than that), they should view Europe as an ancestral home. Most white American tourists to Spain and Portugual probably have as much Iberian ancestry as black Americans - almost none.

    If we could restrict tourism to Italy only to Americans with demonstrable Italian ancestry, Italy would be a far more pleasant country to visit.

    Replies: @kaganovitch, @anon, @PaceLaw

    Well said and spot on! Despite the black nationalism and pan-African imagery that many African Americans routinely engage in, only a very limited number really want to visit their ancestral homelands in West Africa, such as Ghana and Nigeria. If they do have a passport, and if they want to travel at all, it will be to places such as France where they can engage in elite consumerism of such luxury brands as Hermes, Hennessy and Lacoste. Given that educated and influent blacks are the only ones who generally travel internationally (only roughly 33% of all African-Americans even have a passport), Europe is definitely considered an ancestral homeland, even if only reluctantly

    •�Replies: @Steve Sailer
    @PaceLaw

    A fair number of educated African Americans feel warmly toward France, not unreasonably.

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Peter Akuleyev, @Jenner Ickham Errican
  111. @Reg Cæsar
    @Dutch Boy


    The people termed Byzantine considered themselves Romans...
    So there were two Roman Empires that lacked a Rome, one in the east and one in the north.

    https://www.azquotes.com/picture-quotes/quote-the-holy-roman-empire-is-neither-holy-nor-roman-nor-an-empire-voltaire-30-37-78.jpg

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Twinkie

    Lately I’ve been reading Gore Vidal’s novel “Julian” about Julian the Apostate, the last Roman Emperor who seriously tried to evict Christianity and re-install the old pagan gods. It’s rather interesting for a lot of reasons, but it does get into elaborate detail about the zany power-sharing game of Twister that went on between the Western Emperor and the Eastern Emperor and all the kooky politics involved. Also the personal-life stuff is fascinating; I had thought that by that point, most educated Romans regarded the old pagan gods as metaphorical, not real; but Vidal has Julian say things like “I actually stood at the place where Persephone returned from Hades to the world above” apparently he believed it. WG Sebald once posed the thought experiment, “Who was the last person alive who actually, really believed in Zeus?” Whoever he was I guess he lived after Julian.

    Vidal is a lively, engaging writer and evidently he did his homework, so the novel is a pretty good portrait of what post-Constantine Rome/Byzantium was like, more fun than a history book and probably a lot more accurate than a book written by a Woke academic.

    •�Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
    @The Germ Theory of Disease


    WG Sebald once posed the thought experiment, “Who was the last person alive who actually, really believed in Zeus?”
    It depends. It is certain that Aristotle, 300 BC, did not literally believe in Zeus. But he gave a copy of "Iliad" to Alexander.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Dutch Boy
    , @Jonathan Mason
    @The Germ Theory of Disease


    WG Sebald once posed the thought experiment, “Who was the last person alive who actually, really believed in Zeus?”
    I was in Crete earlier this year and Zeus was there, albeit sleeping.

    I therefore turned down the opportunity to visit his cave--apparently one of several that he has claimed as his home.

    As far as I am concerned Zeus is just as good as any God, given his interest in earthquakes, thunderstorms, and the price of olives. Certainly a lot more credible than Yahweh or Allah.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  112. @Thomm
    People with WN inclinations should give far more reverence and gratitude to the one creature that kept blacks on the other side of the Sahara.

    If not for this one species, blacks would have migrated northward on the Nile, spread along the far more hospitable Mediterranean coast of Africa by 2000 BC, and since the M. Sea has weak tides and short distances between land, blacks would have migrated across the Levant and Turkey to the European coast, and taken over the good-weather land in what is now Spain, Southern France, Italy, Croatia, Greece, etc. by no later than 1400 BC. Even if Blacks chose not to go further north than Central France due to cold winters, their presence in Southern Europe from 1400 BC onwards would have precluded the formation of Greek and Roman societies. This would have prevented Western Civ outright, since Northern Europe might not have advanced without Greece and Rome having existed for a long time first. The Vikings, Goths, and Kievan Rus might have been the high points of white society, after which the Mongols would have come over to take over Kievan Rus as well as purge blacks from Europe. So Europe today would be Mongol.

    So, what is this noble creature to which Western Civ owes its gratitude?

    The Nile Crocodile.

    See the range of the Nile Crocodile (per Wikipedia) :

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/52/The_range_of_the_Nile_Crocodile.png

    It clearly kept blacks bottled up in Sub-Saharan Africa by preventing them from migrating northward (downstream) on the Nile. It is a large, aggressive, and dangerous creature that happily eats humans.

    WN wiggers need to express more gratitude to the Nile Crocodile. Fortunately, one of the last of the classical National Geographic wildlife specials from 1995 was titled ‘Last Feast of the Crocodiles’. It is very good, and features the legendary NatGeo theme music with trumpets and drums in their full glory :

    https://youtu.be/u6ufEnacPqw

    Lest you think the Nile Crocodile is just a counterpart to our own American Alligators, this video reveals how much larger the Nile Crocodile is :

    https://youtu.be/fRDSh01lrLg

    Hence, WN beliefs require veneration of the Nile Crocodile, and the NatGeo special should be seen as religious material for WN wiggers.

    https://youtu.be/MD53hwAN5DY

    Replies: @jb, @Trinity, @Anonymous, @Moshe Def

    This is AT LEAST the second time you posted this 🐊 story.
    Yes, thank you for telling all of us that the Nile crocodiles are larger than American alligators. Damn, we had no idea 🥴. Lol. I have heard of some gators about 14 feet, no idea of weight, still significantly smaller than large crocodiles but would be about average for a average crocodile.

    Okay, Jim Fowler, R.I.P ( my GP was related to Jungle Jim) let’s have an Animal Face-Off

    Hippo vs. Rhino ?
    Who wins?

    •�Replies: @Isabel Archer
    @Trinity

    The gators in these videos from Florida and South Carolina look pretty big to me. Usually they are seen crossing golf courses. One in Fripp Island, SC was nicknamed Sherman the Tank:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXn1g0xtUMk
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cy2akN2bTX4
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6vfCowyoSY
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWS5xfIaoeA

    Replies: @Trinity
  113. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    @BB753

    What about Mother Russia? Its claim as successor to Rome is based on marriage to House of Eastern Roman emperors, and European laws of inheritance.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moscow,_third_Rome

    Are the Russian title Czar (cf. Caesar) illegitimate?

    Replies: @BB753

    Eastern Europe is different. They do claim Byzantium. And they do not have hang-ups about “swarthy” Greeks. For cultural, political and religious reasons, Western Europeans look down on Byzantium. There was plenty of bad blood between Constantinople and the West, and not only because of the Crusades.

    •�Replies: @anon
    @BB753

    Rome usurped Byzantine and claimed its culture as its own. This is all very well explained in the articles by Laurent Guyenot and First Millenium Revisionist on this site.
    , @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    @BB753

    Yeah bro obviously, the West allied with Mohammedans against Constantinople, even romanticized the episode.

    Harun al-Rashid receiving a delegation of Charlemagne in Baghdad

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/47/Harun_al-Rashid_receives_envoys_from_Charlemagne.jpg

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abbasid–Carolingian_alliance
  114. In ancient Rome Negroes were such a rare sight they would be pitted against one another in gladiator battles in the coliseum. Looks like it is not just British history that is being black washed.

    •�Replies: @anon
    @anonymouseperson

    Says who?

    This book has included over 140 illustrations which depict the Negro as the Greeks and Romans conceived of him in mythology and religion and observed him in a number of occupations-as servant, diplomat, warrior, athlete, and performer, among others.

    https://www.amazon.com/Blacks-Antiquity-Ethiopians-Greco-Roman-Experience/dp/0674076265
  115. @Stan Adams
    The media-infotainment-indoctrination complex has been shoving Blacks! into just about everything for quite a few years now.

    Replies: @CalCooledge

    If the relentless woke propaganda results in keeping alive the backlash, resulting in Vance elected in 28, let it happen.

  116. @Bardon Kaldian
    This all is American psychotic stuff.

    In French, Spanish, German, Polish, Russian, Japanese…cinema no one of “other” race would be allowed to play a person who is known, whether from history or from fictional universes, to belong to a well defined racial category as is the case with Europeans.

    Black in the role of Stalin? No.

    Japanese in the role of Bismarck? No.

    Asian Indian in the role of Robespierre? No.

    African black in the role of Turgenev’s Bazarov? No.

    American black in the role of Goethe’s Werther? No.

    One can make adaptations of some works to different racial-cultural ambient (Kurosawa did it with Shakespeare and Dostoevsky), but to put actors of visibly different races in “others’” roles is a form of madness and mental suicide.

    And even in the case of "a few could have been", as with parts of the ancient Mediterranean, it is a sign of psychotic Negrolary & a pathological attitude towards one particular racial minority that all non-degenerate world finds uncomfortable to be around.

    Replies: @obwandiyag, @Anonymous, @kaganovitch

    John Wayne played Genghis Khan in The Conqueror. The Swede Warner Oland and Anglo American Sidney Toller played Charlie Chan.

    •�Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
    @Anonymous

    Because there were actually no Asian actors. And there is such wide difference between whites and Asians as is the case with blacks and all other races.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
    , @Anonymous
    @Anonymous

    As silly as those casting decisions were, the movies were not saying that Genghis was white or Chan is white. Rather, they were cases of white people made up as Asians, much like blackface was about whites-as-blacks. Like what Robert Downey Jr. does in Tropic Thunder. He plays black.

    In contrast, the recent castings pretend that prominent European figures of the past were indeed blackity-black.
  117. @PaceLaw
    @Peter Akuleyev

    Well said and spot on! Despite the black nationalism and pan-African imagery that many African Americans routinely engage in, only a very limited number really want to visit their ancestral homelands in West Africa, such as Ghana and Nigeria. If they do have a passport, and if they want to travel at all, it will be to places such as France where they can engage in elite consumerism of such luxury brands as Hermes, Hennessy and Lacoste. Given that educated and influent blacks are the only ones who generally travel internationally (only roughly 33% of all African-Americans even have a passport), Europe is definitely considered an ancestral homeland, even if only reluctantly

    Replies: @Steve Sailer

    A fair number of educated African Americans feel warmly toward France, not unreasonably.

    •�Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @Steve Sailer

    Well after all, it's the only other country where "pussy" is pronounced "puss-AY."
    , @Peter Akuleyev
    @Steve Sailer

    I wonder how long it will be until we see affluent African-Americans complaining about how the Cameroonian, Congolese and Senegalese immigrants are destroying Paris?
    , @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @Steve Sailer


    A fair number of educated African Americans feel warmly toward France, not unreasonably.
    Remember Ta-Nehisi Coates’s goofy sojourn in Paris?

    OTOH, bon vivant Blacks truly steeped in authentic French culture are quite entertaining:

    “In-cray-ah-blay!”


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bVoGXA5PZY
  118. @Steve Sailer
    @PaceLaw

    A fair number of educated African Americans feel warmly toward France, not unreasonably.

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Peter Akuleyev, @Jenner Ickham Errican

    Well after all, it’s the only other country where “pussy” is pronounced “puss-AY.”

  119. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    @Peter Akuleyev

    Foundational Americans are predominantly Protestants. Are Rhineland, Southwest Germany and other areas that were under Roman control, predominantly Protestant?

    Gladiator falsely depicted the Emperor Marcus Aurelius, as having conquered "last of the Germans". When in reality he failed to annex north of the Danube:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcomannic_Wars

    Those defeats and struggles inspired the philosopher king's timeless work on Stoic philosophy:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meditations

    the Germanii who fought the Romans in the Teutoburg forest.
    And the chieftain of that battle became the symbol of German nationalism, of liberation against rapacious Roman invaders, didn't he?

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/ba/Hermannsdenkmal_statue.jpg

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arminius

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @Peter Akuleyev, @Reg Cæsar

    We have our own monument to Hermann, in New Ulm (not in Hermann!) Dressed more warmly, naturally.

    https://www.roadsideamerica.com/story/11260

  120. anon[284] •�Disclaimer says:
    @Dutch Boy
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    Present day Italians looked pretty white to me on my travels there. I think we Americans get an impression that Italians are quite swarthy because of the large numbers of Sicilians among them in America. We had a Sicilian guide from eastern Sicily (the Greek part, as she put it) who scoffed at "those Arabs" in Western Sicily.

    Replies: @anon

    Southern Italians on average have more Middle Eastern ancestry than African, and more from North Africa than from sub Saharan Africa, and Middle Easterners do look pretty white. Italians also cluster very close with Ashkenazi Jews who of course also do look white.

    Human genetic diversity in Italy and southern Europe generally is higher than in other regions of Europe. And Italy appears to be a zone of sharp differentiation over small distances. When compared to other populations, Italians do not cluster all together, but are distributed among European and Mediterranean people. Southern Italians show a higher similarity with Middle Eastern, North African and Southern Balkan populations than northern ones.

    And Sicily and many parts of Southern Italy have similar genetics.

    •�Replies: @Dutch Boy
    @anon

    My boss for years was an Italian guy whose people came from Naples. His skin was fairer than my Dutch/Norwegian hide and I have known other Italians in a similar condition. I assumed this was a legacy from the Goths, Lombards, and Gauls that inhabited/invaded Italy in the past.

    Replies: @anon
  121. @BB753
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    Eastern Europe is different. They do claim Byzantium. And they do not have hang-ups about "swarthy" Greeks. For cultural, political and religious reasons, Western Europeans look down on Byzantium. There was plenty of bad blood between Constantinople and the West, and not only because of the Crusades.

    Replies: @anon, @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    Rome usurped Byzantine and claimed its culture as its own. This is all very well explained in the articles by Laurent Guyenot and First Millenium Revisionist on this site.

  122. @Thomm
    People with WN inclinations should give far more reverence and gratitude to the one creature that kept blacks on the other side of the Sahara.

    If not for this one species, blacks would have migrated northward on the Nile, spread along the far more hospitable Mediterranean coast of Africa by 2000 BC, and since the M. Sea has weak tides and short distances between land, blacks would have migrated across the Levant and Turkey to the European coast, and taken over the good-weather land in what is now Spain, Southern France, Italy, Croatia, Greece, etc. by no later than 1400 BC. Even if Blacks chose not to go further north than Central France due to cold winters, their presence in Southern Europe from 1400 BC onwards would have precluded the formation of Greek and Roman societies. This would have prevented Western Civ outright, since Northern Europe might not have advanced without Greece and Rome having existed for a long time first. The Vikings, Goths, and Kievan Rus might have been the high points of white society, after which the Mongols would have come over to take over Kievan Rus as well as purge blacks from Europe. So Europe today would be Mongol.

    So, what is this noble creature to which Western Civ owes its gratitude?

    The Nile Crocodile.

    See the range of the Nile Crocodile (per Wikipedia) :

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/52/The_range_of_the_Nile_Crocodile.png

    It clearly kept blacks bottled up in Sub-Saharan Africa by preventing them from migrating northward (downstream) on the Nile. It is a large, aggressive, and dangerous creature that happily eats humans.

    WN wiggers need to express more gratitude to the Nile Crocodile. Fortunately, one of the last of the classical National Geographic wildlife specials from 1995 was titled ‘Last Feast of the Crocodiles’. It is very good, and features the legendary NatGeo theme music with trumpets and drums in their full glory :

    https://youtu.be/u6ufEnacPqw

    Lest you think the Nile Crocodile is just a counterpart to our own American Alligators, this video reveals how much larger the Nile Crocodile is :

    https://youtu.be/fRDSh01lrLg

    Hence, WN beliefs require veneration of the Nile Crocodile, and the NatGeo special should be seen as religious material for WN wiggers.

    https://youtu.be/MD53hwAN5DY

    Replies: @jb, @Trinity, @Anonymous, @Moshe Def

    Pure garbage.

    There is *ONE* and *ONE* reason only that black Africans are taking over Europe, crocodiles or no crocodiles: The existence of an Economist magazine whipped political class which has absolute monopoly political power in Europe which most earnestly *WANTS* black African immigration.

    •�Thanks: anonymouseperson
  123. Anonymous[327] •�Disclaimer says:
    @jb
    @Thomm

    This is a very silly comment. The "hospitable Mediterranean coast of Africa" was fully occupied well before 2000BC, and the inhabitants were quite capable of repelling invaders from the south. Beyond that, crocodiles didn't stop the Egyptians from navigating the Nile, did they? Not a very effective barrier! And why would you need crocodiles when you have a much more effective barrier: the Sudd?

    Replies: @Anonymous

    For whatever reason, Black Africans were never sea fearers – perhaps this is down to deep atavistic fears that often have a real hold on the African mind, taboos which cause a real mental paralysis, which are most often seen today in matters involving superstition. In short, the open sea held a real inhibiting terror for Africans. It is curious to note that Africans never sailed to the various Portuguese colonised islands lying relatively near to the west African coast. Neither did they reach Madagascar lying off the east African coast, which was settled by Micronesians, sailing from the other side of the world.
    So it is unlikely that black Africans would haver ever crossed the Mediterranean under their own volition.

    •�Replies: @Corvinus
    @Anonymous

    The statement that Africans "didn't sail" is inaccurate; historical evidence shows that Africans did engage in seafaring activities, particularly along the coasts of their continent, but the extent of their long-distance voyages was often limited due to factors like geographical challenges, technological constraints, and the focus on local trade networks within Africa, unlike the large-scale European exploration voyages across oceans. Jared Diamond discussed it on his seminal work.

    Replies: @trevor
  124. @BB753
    @Jonathan Mason

    Yet Denzel wasn't totally on board with the gay kiss scene.
    https://people.com/ridley-scott-says-denzel-washington-acted-same-sex-kiss-gladiator-ii-didnt-happen-8747771

    Replies: @Old Prude

    “Gay kiss scene” Thanks for the warning.

    Gladiator had great fight scenes, and Crowe chewed up the role, (Are you not entertained?!!), but as story telling it was poorly done.

  125. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    The number of years each region was part of the Roman Empire.

    Anatolia, the Levant and North Africa were more core Roman than NW Europe.

    https://i.postimg.cc/rpPZWdVH/GIiv-Mqn-WMAA72-O3.jpg

    There's no shame in white Europeans for being on the peripherals of Roman civilization.

    For white Europeans to claim Roman heritage solely for themselves is completely shameless.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @BB753, @Corpse Tooth, @Thomm, @Coconuts, @Pixo, @Coconuts, @Ibero

    For white Europeans to claim Roman heritage solely for themselves is completely shameless.

    As far as the Western half of the empire goes, Latin became the sacred language in much of Western Europe for a long time, until the 1960s for Catholic Europe. So that is ~1500 years when it was in daily use all over that area. Religion used to be more central in life and people were praying and reading in Latin all of the time, religious material but also surviving Roman authors. 

    And their religion was about how God became incarnate in the world in the time of Divus Augustus, and Christ acknowledged the political authority of Caesar. Dante wrote about how God blessed the Roman Empire in this way. 

    A large part of the population spoke languages derived from vulgar Latin in the rest of their life and were partly descended from Italian origin colonists who arrived during the time of the Roman Empire. They were still using Roman Law as one of their legal references, and writing philosophy, history and science in Latin until the 18th century.  

    The populations who didn’t speak Latin derived languages tended to be influenced culturally by those who did. The ongoing presence of the Roman empire as a political reference point has already been mentioned in relation to Charlemagne. 

    We can compare that with the surviving Latin cultural legacy in North Africa and the Middle East, after the Arabs arrived with Islam and had been established for some centuries, or the Turks later on. Imo this is likely to be why, after a certain point in time, Western Europe became de facto the main carrier of the Latin Roman heritage. 

    [MORE]

    In the East it would be centred on Greek speaking Christians and any remaining pagans. Since they have pratically gone by now from the Middle East and North Africa, this legacy has also ended up centred on Europe. Romanians are interesting in having a Latin derived language but Orthodox religion, so in some way they bridge the two spheres.

    •�Replies: @anon
    @Coconuts


    Romanians are interesting in having a Latin derived language
    Latin is a language originating from Dacia; ancient Dacian did not vanish mysteriously but is the common ancestor of both Latin and modern Romanian. Dacian, if you will, is Vulgar Latin, which preceded Classical Latin. A likely explanation for the fact that Dacia is also called Romania is that it—rather than Italy—was the original home of the Romans who founded Constantinople. The Roman language (Latin) remained the administrative language of the Eastern Empire until the sixth century AD, when it was abandoned for Greek, the language spoken by the majority of its subjects.

    Replies: @Odyssey
    , @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    @Coconuts


    after a certain point in time, Western Europe became de facto the main carrier of the Latin Roman heritage.
    Maybe. But what is that "point in time"? For most of Early Middle Ages Europe was illiterate.

    Charlemagne's empire was not sound or durable was it? It fragmented among his heirs and lapsed into feudalism.

    Whereas Eastern Empire maintained institutional continuity and undertook revivals under Justinian and Irene.

    A large part of the population spoke languages derived from vulgar Latin
    Why does that matter? Vulgar Latin failed to maintain the ancient Indo-European case system. Such that someone like Heidegger claimed that philosophy can only be done in Greek and German.

    We can compare that with the surviving Latin cultural legacy in North Africa and the Middle East, after the Arabs arrived with Islam
    The ancient classics were in Greek. But for many centuries Germans were not interested in learning were they? Thus that there were very few Greek texts in Europe until the Renaissance.

    Learning was carried on by Muslims who translated from Greek to Arabic, such that later Europeans had to learn Arabic to read both the original works and the Muslim commentaries.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmission_of_the_Greek_Classics

    Thus the Islamic world was the de facto the main carrier of classical learning, from 8th to 13th CE, wasn't it? Until Mongols sacked Baghdad.

    they have pratically gone by now from the Middle East and North Africa,
    The Byzantine scholars brought along their Greek texts, to the West where it largely didn't exist due to destruction by Germanic barbarians.

    But what if Constantinople hadn't been sacked, would the Renaissance even have taken place?

    Constantinople and Baghdad were both sacked by the most formidable warriors in premodern era-- Eurasian nomads. Europe is in the corner of Eurasia and happens to be insulated.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian, @Reg Cæsar, @Coconuts
  126. “Is it historically accurate to cast a black villain in the Roman Empire?”

    Uh,…no. Because black lives matter, and certainly not as villains. To even ask the question smacks of, or definitely has a touch of racism about it.

    Racist, racist, racist, racist, and racist.

    Five racist cards played to a Full House

  127. @Steve Sailer
    @PaceLaw

    A fair number of educated African Americans feel warmly toward France, not unreasonably.

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Peter Akuleyev, @Jenner Ickham Errican

    I wonder how long it will be until we see affluent African-Americans complaining about how the Cameroonian, Congolese and Senegalese immigrants are destroying Paris?

    •�Agree: Bardon Kaldian
  128. @Thomm
    People with WN inclinations should give far more reverence and gratitude to the one creature that kept blacks on the other side of the Sahara.

    If not for this one species, blacks would have migrated northward on the Nile, spread along the far more hospitable Mediterranean coast of Africa by 2000 BC, and since the M. Sea has weak tides and short distances between land, blacks would have migrated across the Levant and Turkey to the European coast, and taken over the good-weather land in what is now Spain, Southern France, Italy, Croatia, Greece, etc. by no later than 1400 BC. Even if Blacks chose not to go further north than Central France due to cold winters, their presence in Southern Europe from 1400 BC onwards would have precluded the formation of Greek and Roman societies. This would have prevented Western Civ outright, since Northern Europe might not have advanced without Greece and Rome having existed for a long time first. The Vikings, Goths, and Kievan Rus might have been the high points of white society, after which the Mongols would have come over to take over Kievan Rus as well as purge blacks from Europe. So Europe today would be Mongol.

    So, what is this noble creature to which Western Civ owes its gratitude?

    The Nile Crocodile.

    See the range of the Nile Crocodile (per Wikipedia) :

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/52/The_range_of_the_Nile_Crocodile.png

    It clearly kept blacks bottled up in Sub-Saharan Africa by preventing them from migrating northward (downstream) on the Nile. It is a large, aggressive, and dangerous creature that happily eats humans.

    WN wiggers need to express more gratitude to the Nile Crocodile. Fortunately, one of the last of the classical National Geographic wildlife specials from 1995 was titled ‘Last Feast of the Crocodiles’. It is very good, and features the legendary NatGeo theme music with trumpets and drums in their full glory :

    https://youtu.be/u6ufEnacPqw

    Lest you think the Nile Crocodile is just a counterpart to our own American Alligators, this video reveals how much larger the Nile Crocodile is :

    https://youtu.be/fRDSh01lrLg

    Hence, WN beliefs require veneration of the Nile Crocodile, and the NatGeo special should be seen as religious material for WN wiggers.

    https://youtu.be/MD53hwAN5DY

    Replies: @jb, @Trinity, @Anonymous, @Moshe Def

    Thank you, Nile Crocodile. What a good boy.

    •�Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @Moshe Def

    So... a people who couldn't figure out how to overcome a crocodile were somehow nevertheless going to become the masters of the Mediterranean and Europe.

    Okay.

    Replies: @Mike Tre
  129. @Dutch Boy
    @Pixo

    Byzantine is a term used by historians. The people termed Byzantine considered themselves Romans and were so considered by their enemies.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @anon, @Twinkie

    About Rome and its relation to Byzantine read the many very insightful articles by Laurent Guyenot and First Millennium Revisionist on unz.com.

    https://www.unz.com/article/how-long-was-the-first-millenium/

    https://www.unz.com/article/a-short-history-of-civilization/

  130. @Anonymous
    @Bardon Kaldian

    John Wayne played Genghis Khan in The Conqueror. The Swede Warner Oland and Anglo American Sidney Toller played Charlie Chan.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EHt0Pb8rkXU

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3FdoGvpcLw

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian, @Anonymous

    Because there were actually no Asian actors. And there is such wide difference between whites and Asians as is the case with blacks and all other races.

    •�Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
    @Bardon Kaldian

    I meant "no such wide ...".
  131. @Bardon Kaldian
    It's American blacks that have this ancient achievers complex. Brazilians, Colombia's blacks, Africans,.... simply don't care.

    Replies: @Anon

    I’ll fix this a bit… (((Those people))) in America who run the media have told blacks that they were ancient achievers, therefore they’ve developed a complex about it. Remove (((those people))) and the blacks in America simply wouldn’t care either.

    -Rooster

    •�Replies: @Jack D
    @Anon

    That's ridiculous. The blacks who are into the Hotep/We Wuz Kangs stuff are also the blacks who are the most anti-Semitic and the ones who are most detached from mainstream and academic media sources.

    Getting rid of Joos is not the all purpose solution to all of America's ills that the Men of Unz seem to think it is. You will still have your blacks (which BTW YOU and not the Jews brought here) and they will be just as troublesome as they have been for the last 400 years.

    If blacks are less troublesome in other countries it is because WASPs were always wooly headed and had a soft spot in their bleeding hearts for them and for every other type of loser. Was there ever any equivalent of the New England abolitionist movement in Brazil?

    Replies: @Mark G., @AnotherDad, @Curle, @newrouter
  132. @The Anti-Gnostic
    @Jack D

    I know Syrians who could pass at the Rotary Club meetings in Des Moines.

    Replies: @Rohirrimborn

    In the early eighties when I lived in Chicago I had a friend of Syrian ancestry. His grandparents arrived in the early 20th century. He resembled a Caddyshack Rodney Dangerfield. He actually knew the Syrian language a bit. Once we were out in downtown and a car of a recently arrived (from Syria) middle aged couple stopped and asked for directions. We couldn’t help them and the woman complained to her husband in Syrian about dumb Americans. They were shocked and embarrassed when my buddy started talking Syrian to them. They were profusely apologetic and courteous after that.

    •�Replies: @Mike Tre
    @Rohirrimborn

    Not to quibble but they were speaking "Syrian"? I thought Syrians spoke Arabic.

    Replies: @Odyssey
    , @kaganovitch
    @Rohirrimborn


    We couldn’t help them and the woman complained to her husband in Syrian about dumb Americans. They were shocked and embarrassed when my buddy started talking Syrian to them. They were profusely apologetic and courteous after that.
    Is Syrian a language? I thought Syrians speak Arabic.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  133. @J.Ross
    Egypt was black (Kushite) -- after it had already been Egypt for thousands of years, and in what was regarded as a come-down, something like Rome becoming German or China becoming Qing -- and they were eventually driven out. Also, Thomas Jefferson never had a child with Sally Hemmings.

    Replies: @guest007

    What is the basis of the claim on Thomas Jefferson?

    •�Replies: @J.Ross
    @guest007

    An old black propaganda slur from an election, plus modern black credulity. The basis of the rebuttal is a conference of historians.

    Replies: @guest007
  134. @obwandiyag
    @Bardon Kaldian

    The English are crazy for it. Dickens. Austen. etc

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian, @Lurker

    Yeah, they’re US copycats, that’s why.

  135. @Bardon Kaldian
    @Anonymous

    Because there were actually no Asian actors. And there is such wide difference between whites and Asians as is the case with blacks and all other races.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian

    I meant “no such wide …”.

  136. @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality
    The Persian Empire was the equal of the Roman Empire. What happened? The Aryans ended up mixing with non-Aryans and it permanently hurt them.

    The same thing happened in India. Ancient India was very impressive when it was ruled by Whites after the Aryan "migration". But then they mixed with the locals and it led to 2,000 years of misery.

    We forget those examples because they turned brown and went down and we don't feel connected to them. Europe, on the other hand, stayed white after the Western Roman Empire fell and Europeans went on to built Western Civilization and land on the moon.

    Replies: @kaganovitch

    The Persian Empire was the equal of the Roman Empire. What happened?

    Eh, Alexander happened.

    •�Replies: @guest007
    @kaganovitch

    Alexander was before the Roman Empire.
    , @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality
    @kaganovitch

    So what? That can't be the reason Persia sank in the big picture. There were tons of conquerors that came and went all over Europe. But they stayed white and they literally took over world and space.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  137. @Bardon Kaldian
    This all is American psychotic stuff.

    In French, Spanish, German, Polish, Russian, Japanese…cinema no one of “other” race would be allowed to play a person who is known, whether from history or from fictional universes, to belong to a well defined racial category as is the case with Europeans.

    Black in the role of Stalin? No.

    Japanese in the role of Bismarck? No.

    Asian Indian in the role of Robespierre? No.

    African black in the role of Turgenev’s Bazarov? No.

    American black in the role of Goethe’s Werther? No.

    One can make adaptations of some works to different racial-cultural ambient (Kurosawa did it with Shakespeare and Dostoevsky), but to put actors of visibly different races in “others’” roles is a form of madness and mental suicide.

    And even in the case of "a few could have been", as with parts of the ancient Mediterranean, it is a sign of psychotic Negrolary & a pathological attitude towards one particular racial minority that all non-degenerate world finds uncomfortable to be around.

    Replies: @obwandiyag, @Anonymous, @kaganovitch

    This all is American psychotic stuff.

    More like Anglophone psychosis. It’s as bad or worse in the UK.

    •�Agree: Bardon Kaldian
    •�Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
    @kaganovitch

    "It’s as bad or worse in the UK."

    The Rivals (Jilly Cooper not Sheridan) was written in 1988 and already (in the book) the TV regulator was arguing for more diversity in the programming.

    But it goes back to the 1960s - Til Death Us Do Part (of which All In The Family was a clone) was basically a huge pro-immigration tract disguised as comedy, and BBC execs were disconcerted when a lot of people approved of Alf Garnett, not having got the memo that only ignorant people were racists.
  138. @kaganovitch
    @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality


    The Persian Empire was the equal of the Roman Empire. What happened?
    Eh, Alexander happened.

    Replies: @guest007, @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality

    Alexander was before the Roman Empire.

  139. @kaganovitch
    @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality


    The Persian Empire was the equal of the Roman Empire. What happened?
    Eh, Alexander happened.

    Replies: @guest007, @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality

    So what? That can’t be the reason Persia sank in the big picture. There were tons of conquerors that came and went all over Europe. But they stayed white and they literally took over world and space.

    •�Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
    @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality

    Iranians now are not more mixed than contemporary Greeks, Italians etc. I know this racial theory of "blood contamination leading to stupidity", but it doesn't hold water. Iran from 500-300 BC was significantly less powerful than Iran from the 8th to the 18th C, from creativity (Al Khwarizmi, Omar Khayyam, Hafiz, Rumi,..) to the military expansion (Nadir Shah & the rest). Contemporary Iranians excel in science and technology, lunatic religious ideology aside.

    If you don't want to become ill-suited for civilization:

    a) don't mix with Africans

    b) don't take Islam seriously

    Replies: @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality
  140. @Mike Tre
    @Almost Missouri

    Denzel Washington is a very mediocre actor; the extent of his range pretty much being how far the blackity-black dial gets turned up or down. Otherwise he's the same guy in every film, and so many movies would have been better all around had a white lead been in his place (think Bruce Willis leading in Man on Fire, for example.)

    Replies: @Twinkie, @Truth

    Denzel Washington is a very mediocre actor; the extent of his range pretty much being how far the blackity-black dial gets turned up or down. Otherwise he’s the same guy in every film, and so many movies would have been better all around had a white lead been in his place (think Bruce Willis leading in Man on Fire, for example.)

    Washington was excellent in films such as Glory, Crimson Tide and Training Day. But even good (or great) actors coast once they reach a certain age – see Robert De Niro or even Marlon Brando.

    •�Replies: @Mike Tre
    @Twinkie

    All three of those movies are garbage.
  141. @IHTG

    When the superb traditional Egyptian aesthetic, such as hieroglyphics, first emerged about 5,000 years ago, the population was largely descended from Caucasian farmers of the Fertile Crescent.
    The earliest Egyptians probably were darker-skinned than the Egyptians of Greco-Roman times, though.

    (In fact, many human populations are now known to have become lighter-skinned over the centuries, contrary to certain doom-pilled white nationalist historiographies about recessive genes and rising tides of color)

    Replies: @Jack D, @Santoculto

    Darker doesnt mean racially subsaharian. Like they may had an olive skin and semitic features, even thought i have no problem if ancient Egyptians were kind of “Black”, if they were a different and currently extinct breed than the negroid variant of today. The same way happened with ancient Romans and Greeks.

    •�Replies: @mc23
    @Santoculto

    It’s a shame that desire to please and ingratiate a politically correct academia and those who sponsor it leads to spurious race science. Thankfully it may be passing. For example, some more recent constructions of Cheddar Man in England have moved from portraying him with black skin to merely being dark, more in keeping with Early European farmers out of Anatolia and Persia.

    https://twitter.com/Sulkalmakh/status/1858163182440693941/photo/2
  142. @Dutch Boy
    @Pixo

    Byzantine is a term used by historians. The people termed Byzantine considered themselves Romans and were so considered by their enemies.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @anon, @Twinkie

    Byzantine is a term used by historians. The people termed Byzantine considered themselves Romans and were so considered by their enemies.

    “The Byzantines” called themselves Romaioi, a term I always found amusing, it being “Romans” in Greek, rather than Latin.

    •�Replies: @anon
    @Twinkie

    Romos, latinized in Romus or Remus, is a Greek word meaning “strong”. The Italian Romans were Etruscans from Lydia in Asia Minor. They were well aware of their eastern origin. But then Roman clerics, followed by Italian humanists, produced an inverted chronological sequence, using the real history of Constantinople as the model for their fake earlier history of Italian Rome. A great confusion ensued, as “many mediaeval documents confuse the two Romes: in Italy and on the Bosporus,” both being commonly called Rome or “the City”. The prototype for Titus Livy’s History was about Constantinople, the original capital of the “Romans”.
    , @Jonathan Mason
    @Twinkie


    “The Byzantines” called themselves Romaioi, a term I always found amusing, it being “Romans” in Greek, rather than Latin.
    And the Romanians called themselves Romanians, instead of Dacians. Once a Roman, always a Roman.
    , @Johann Ricke
    @Twinkie


    “The Byzantines” called themselves Romaioi, a term I always found amusing, it being “Romans” in Greek, rather than Latin.
    What I don't get is why they did not simply call themselves Greeks. It's not as if there were no precedent for Greek empire.

    Replies: @anon
  143. @Reg Cæsar
    @Dutch Boy


    The people termed Byzantine considered themselves Romans...
    So there were two Roman Empires that lacked a Rome, one in the east and one in the north.

    https://www.azquotes.com/picture-quotes/quote-the-holy-roman-empire-is-neither-holy-nor-roman-nor-an-empire-voltaire-30-37-78.jpg

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Twinkie

    So there were two Roman Empires that lacked a Rome, one in the east and one in the north.

    The Holy Roman Empire was actually: Heiliges Römisches Reich Deutscher Nation/Sacrum Imperium Romanum Nationis Germaniae – Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation.

    And Byzantion/Constantinopolis was the Second Rome, so… It was Roman.

    •�Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @Twinkie

    At a Russian immersion class taught by (mostly) natives I attended back in the late Soviet era, a fellow student said he'd overheard a couple of the teachers referring to "Saint Petersburg". Another replied that that was nothing; he had heard them talking of Constantinople.


    https://youtu.be/Wcze7EGorOk?si=0y2MjGoGsge54px9


    Lyrics by an Ulsterman, no less. Saint Petersburg would be back within seven years; Constantinople didn't change until the lifetimes of the older teachers, so it wasn't as radical (or reactionary) as we thought.

    Replies: @Isabel Archer
  144. @Peter Akuleyev
    @kaganovitch

    My proposal would also prevent African migrants from coming, unless they have demonstrable Italian ancestry. Obviously.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @The Germ Theory of Disease, @AnotherDad

    My proposal would also prevent African migrants from coming, unless they have demonstrable Italian ancestry. Obviously.

    Nah your comment was just taking a whiny shot at core (GermanoCelt) Americans and parroting a current leftist trope of “over tourism”. Basically to play up problems caused by “tourists”–white people–and downplay/ignore the real problems caused by immigrants–non-white people.

    Of course, tourists can be annoying as hell. (I try to behave and not be an “ugly American”, but I’ve failed a time or two.) And the rising world prosperity has meant more and more “tourists” out and about with most of them going to a lot of the same places crowded the “hot spots”–the monuments, markets, museums, plazas and piazzas, cathedrals, restaurants, sidewalks, trails … (You don’t have to go to Italy or Barcelona. AnotherBrother and I were moving AnotherDaughter’s car in 2021 and drove through Yellowstone–we were not alone. Or try Yosemite on any nice summer day. LOL.)

    But tourists … go back home. You can easily regulate their numbers with visas, permits, hotel taxes, admission fees, etc. etc. The reason they’re around at all is lots of people make money off of them. Tourists provide “free money” a city/region/nation doesn’t have to come up with by trading something people actually want–wheat, maize, lumber, oil, gas, steel, autos, airplanes, electronics, ships, software …

    Immigrants in contrast, do not go home. The problems they bring are permanent. They leave their genes behind to keep those issues and conflicts going forever.

  145. @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @Mr. Anon

    "I find it strange that movies about Rome seem to focus almost entirely on Gladiators."

    Aw, I bet you don't like movies about Turkish prisons, either.

    Call me when you sell your spec about Syrian architects and engineers building the aqueducts. I can just see the pitch meeting -- "It's The Fountainhead! But set in ancient Rome! So we can have gladiators too!"

    Replies: @Tex

    I like the occasional sword & sandal movie. So one night Mrs. Tex and me are watching some Hercules film where the strong man gets enslaved and put to work building a road. Sinister baddies want to make him a gladiator though. So we get several scenes where the slave boss is complaining that the road building will be behind schedule if they don’t have Hercules. I tuned in for a peplum and got a lecture on project management!

    •�Replies: @muggles
    @Tex


    So we get several scenes where the slave boss is complaining that the road building will be behind schedule if they don’t have Hercules. I tuned in for a peplum and got a lecture on project management!
    I thought about this comment later. Very funny...
  146. @kaganovitch
    @Bardon Kaldian


    This all is American psychotic stuff.
    More like Anglophone psychosis. It's as bad or worse in the UK.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon

    “It’s as bad or worse in the UK.”

    The Rivals (Jilly Cooper not Sheridan) was written in 1988 and already (in the book) the TV regulator was arguing for more diversity in the programming.

    But it goes back to the 1960s – Til Death Us Do Part (of which All In The Family was a clone) was basically a huge pro-immigration tract disguised as comedy, and BBC execs were disconcerted when a lot of people approved of Alf Garnett, not having got the memo that only ignorant people were racists.

  147. @Twinkie
    @Mike Tre


    Denzel Washington is a very mediocre actor; the extent of his range pretty much being how far the blackity-black dial gets turned up or down. Otherwise he’s the same guy in every film, and so many movies would have been better all around had a white lead been in his place (think Bruce Willis leading in Man on Fire, for example.)
    Washington was excellent in films such as Glory, Crimson Tide and Training Day. But even good (or great) actors coast once they reach a certain age - see Robert De Niro or even Marlon Brando.

    Replies: @Mike Tre

    All three of those movies are garbage.

  148. @YetAnotherAnon
    @Renard

    Not only that, but they apparently divided them into "red" and "black" Nubians.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nubians#History

    Still, Disney is "reimagining" the 1980s to some effect. Walt Disney is rotating at 3,600 rpm.

    https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/11/18/10/92189629-14095709-image-a-3_1731924155483.jpg

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @Jim Don Bob

    No matter how much I might otherwise be interested in a show/movie, woke crap like that turns me off completely and I refuse to watch.

    •�Agree: Old Prude
  149. @Mr. Anon
    Why would Ridley Scott feel the need to manufacture a fictional villain for his story when he has a perfectly real villain available - the Emperor Caracalla? I see from the imdb page that he is a character in the movie, but seemingly a secondary one. Caracalla was a real creep, even by the standards of Roman Emperors.

    I thought that Gladiator was a bloated, steaming load of crap. And nobody at the time seem to notice that it was largely ripped off from the 1964 epic The Fall of the Roman Empire. I'm sure that the sequel will be no better. So if Denzel Washington, however anachronistic his casting may be, can make the movie more entertaining, then good for him. He is a very entertaining actor, and as Steve pointed out, is good at playing bad guys.

    I find it strange that movies about Rome seem to focus almost entirely on Gladiators. They did other things too. It would be as if, 2,000 years in the future, all the movies (or whatever they have then) about 20th / 21st century America entirely revolved around pro Football.

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Jim Don Bob, @Jonathan Mason, @Wokechoke

    Romans also invented self healing concrete some of which is still standing 2000 years later. But it’s hard to make a movie about concrete.

    https://news.mit.edu/2023/roman-concrete-durability-lime-casts-0106

    •�Replies: @muggles
    @Jim Don Bob


    Romans also invented self healing concrete some of which is still standing 2000 years later. But it’s hard to make a movie about concrete.
    There are no bad plots, just lazy writers and directors.

    I'm thinking some time lapse photography might be useful...

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  150. anon[392] •�Disclaimer says:
    @Twinkie
    @Dutch Boy


    Byzantine is a term used by historians. The people termed Byzantine considered themselves Romans and were so considered by their enemies.
    "The Byzantines" called themselves Romaioi, a term I always found amusing, it being "Romans" in Greek, rather than Latin.

    Replies: @anon, @Jonathan Mason, @Johann Ricke

    Romos, latinized in Romus or Remus, is a Greek word meaning “strong”. The Italian Romans were Etruscans from Lydia in Asia Minor. They were well aware of their eastern origin. But then Roman clerics, followed by Italian humanists, produced an inverted chronological sequence, using the real history of Constantinople as the model for their fake earlier history of Italian Rome. A great confusion ensued, as “many mediaeval documents confuse the two Romes: in Italy and on the Bosporus,” both being commonly called Rome or “the City”. The prototype for Titus Livy’s History was about Constantinople, the original capital of the “Romans”.

  151. @Mr. Anon
    Why would Ridley Scott feel the need to manufacture a fictional villain for his story when he has a perfectly real villain available - the Emperor Caracalla? I see from the imdb page that he is a character in the movie, but seemingly a secondary one. Caracalla was a real creep, even by the standards of Roman Emperors.

    I thought that Gladiator was a bloated, steaming load of crap. And nobody at the time seem to notice that it was largely ripped off from the 1964 epic The Fall of the Roman Empire. I'm sure that the sequel will be no better. So if Denzel Washington, however anachronistic his casting may be, can make the movie more entertaining, then good for him. He is a very entertaining actor, and as Steve pointed out, is good at playing bad guys.

    I find it strange that movies about Rome seem to focus almost entirely on Gladiators. They did other things too. It would be as if, 2,000 years in the future, all the movies (or whatever they have then) about 20th / 21st century America entirely revolved around pro Football.

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Jim Don Bob, @Jonathan Mason, @Wokechoke

    I find it strange that movies about Rome seem to focus almost entirely on Gladiators. They did other things too.

    I would certainly enjoy a movie about Rome’s Samian pottery industry. I once found a piece that had the maker’s thumbprint on the base.

    A movie could be made starring Washington, called The Last Potter Movie.

  152. @Twinkie
    @Dutch Boy


    Byzantine is a term used by historians. The people termed Byzantine considered themselves Romans and were so considered by their enemies.
    "The Byzantines" called themselves Romaioi, a term I always found amusing, it being "Romans" in Greek, rather than Latin.

    Replies: @anon, @Jonathan Mason, @Johann Ricke

    “The Byzantines” called themselves Romaioi, a term I always found amusing, it being “Romans” in Greek, rather than Latin.

    And the Romanians called themselves Romanians, instead of Dacians. Once a Roman, always a Roman.

  153. @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @Reg Cæsar

    Lately I've been reading Gore Vidal's novel "Julian" about Julian the Apostate, the last Roman Emperor who seriously tried to evict Christianity and re-install the old pagan gods. It's rather interesting for a lot of reasons, but it does get into elaborate detail about the zany power-sharing game of Twister that went on between the Western Emperor and the Eastern Emperor and all the kooky politics involved. Also the personal-life stuff is fascinating; I had thought that by that point, most educated Romans regarded the old pagan gods as metaphorical, not real; but Vidal has Julian say things like "I actually stood at the place where Persephone returned from Hades to the world above" apparently he believed it. WG Sebald once posed the thought experiment, "Who was the last person alive who actually, really believed in Zeus?" Whoever he was I guess he lived after Julian.

    Vidal is a lively, engaging writer and evidently he did his homework, so the novel is a pretty good portrait of what post-Constantine Rome/Byzantium was like, more fun than a history book and probably a lot more accurate than a book written by a Woke academic.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian, @Jonathan Mason

    WG Sebald once posed the thought experiment, “Who was the last person alive who actually, really believed in Zeus?”

    It depends. It is certain that Aristotle, 300 BC, did not literally believe in Zeus. But he gave a copy of “Iliad” to Alexander.

    •�Replies: @J.Ross
    @Bardon Kaldian

    The Iliad is full of good stuff beyond faith in the gods -- indeed, if faith in the gods was the goal, then the Iliad would probably be the last text you'd want to hand out.
    , @Dutch Boy
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Aristotle was a philosophical monotheist, in that he believed that there was one ultimate cause or prime mover.
  154. @Steve Sailer
    @PaceLaw

    A fair number of educated African Americans feel warmly toward France, not unreasonably.

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Peter Akuleyev, @Jenner Ickham Errican

    A fair number of educated African Americans feel warmly toward France, not unreasonably.

    Remember Ta-Nehisi Coates’s goofy sojourn in Paris?

    OTOH, bon vivant Blacks truly steeped in authentic French culture are quite entertaining:

    “In-cray-ah-blay!”

  155. The Romans hated a certain ethnic group on the eastern shore of the Mediterranean, the only group who wouldn’t tolerate their culture or religion. I’m sure they were actual jealous of their monotheism.

    •�Replies: @anon
    @RedPill Boomer

    Some of them maybe, but is this not a myth though? 6 million Jews were living in the Roman Empire, but outside Israel, mainly in Italy and Southern Europe. In contrast, only about 500,000 lived in Judea. The Jews also intermarried with the Roman elite and their God Yaweh conquered Roman paganism. During Greco-Roman times, recorded mass conversions led to 6 million people practicing Judaism in Roman times or up to 10% of the population of the Roman Empire.

    Replies: @mc23
  156. OT — It’s over! The Mayor of Dearborn, Michigan, has declared that as soon as the infamous war criminal (and by far most valued US asset) Benjamin Netanyahu sets foot within city limits of the town that Henry Ford built, Bibi will be arrested! Netanyahu has lost his Dearborn privileges!
    (I can’t help recalling that when Ariel Sharon visited the Dome of the Rock, he did so behind an entire brigade of security. Even granting the normal triple defense advantage, how many cops work in Dearborn?)

  157. @Anonymous
    Do we have say in who gets cast in these movies?

    All we can do is accept or reject, and this is part of a trend of blackening white history. As such, it must be rejected. Who cares about Washington's status as a star? That's supposed to make a difference?

    Even if he's the villain, it's part of the blackening. Making exceptions here and there cuz of X-reasons is weak. It must be rejected and condemned. The equivalent of this would be casting Shaka Zulu as some Irishman. (We understand many Irish want to be black, but it's not the same thing.)
    Weakness must be rejected. Too much of the white spectrum on cultural issues ranges from fervent conformity to fashions to spineless prevarications about 'gee, maybe they have a point'. No, they don't.

    Also, there's a difference between historical inaccuracy, the feature of just about all historical movies, and total fantasy. Braveheart may have little to do with history, but imagine if the Gibson role(or the villain's role for that matter) went to some Arab, Hindu, or Chinese guy. That's beyond inaccuracy. It's pure fantasy.

    The article tries to be balanced and fair-minded but such is a totally wrong approach to the current madness. There were blacks in Ancient Rome, but the current trend is to put blacks in historically prestigious roles. Just as we can't be fair-minded and go for 'ambiguity' with the tranny madness, we can't make exceptions for the blackening of white history. Who wants to waste verbiage wondering if Bruce Jenner is a man or woman? No, he's a man who's nutty.

    Scott made a few decent movies and mostly garbage. Gladiator was garbage that appealed to trashy tastes. Hell with him.

    Replies: @Jonathan Mason

    Black people watch movies. Black people want to see heroes (or villains) who look like them. It is that simple.

    For the same reason there are a lot of middle-aged female detectives on TV.

    •�Replies: @Ministry Of Tongues
    @Jonathan Mason


    It is that simple.
    No, it isn't. There is a world of difference between "We want stories about us" and "All stories must be about us."

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease
  158. @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @Reg Cæsar

    Lately I've been reading Gore Vidal's novel "Julian" about Julian the Apostate, the last Roman Emperor who seriously tried to evict Christianity and re-install the old pagan gods. It's rather interesting for a lot of reasons, but it does get into elaborate detail about the zany power-sharing game of Twister that went on between the Western Emperor and the Eastern Emperor and all the kooky politics involved. Also the personal-life stuff is fascinating; I had thought that by that point, most educated Romans regarded the old pagan gods as metaphorical, not real; but Vidal has Julian say things like "I actually stood at the place where Persephone returned from Hades to the world above" apparently he believed it. WG Sebald once posed the thought experiment, "Who was the last person alive who actually, really believed in Zeus?" Whoever he was I guess he lived after Julian.

    Vidal is a lively, engaging writer and evidently he did his homework, so the novel is a pretty good portrait of what post-Constantine Rome/Byzantium was like, more fun than a history book and probably a lot more accurate than a book written by a Woke academic.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian, @Jonathan Mason

    WG Sebald once posed the thought experiment, “Who was the last person alive who actually, really believed in Zeus?”

    I was in Crete earlier this year and Zeus was there, albeit sleeping.

    I therefore turned down the opportunity to visit his cave–apparently one of several that he has claimed as his home.

    As far as I am concerned Zeus is just as good as any God, given his interest in earthquakes, thunderstorms, and the price of olives. Certainly a lot more credible than Yahweh or Allah.

    •�Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @Jonathan Mason


    Certainly a lot more credible than Yahweh or Allah.
    Yahweh, God, and Allah are just different names in various languages for the same thing. Excuse me, Thing.


    They may have widely-- even wildly-- differing views of the nature and desires of this Person. One Catholic priest even referred to "the alien god of Calvinism". But one can carry this too far.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian, @Bill Jones
  159. @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality
    @kaganovitch

    So what? That can't be the reason Persia sank in the big picture. There were tons of conquerors that came and went all over Europe. But they stayed white and they literally took over world and space.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian

    Iranians now are not more mixed than contemporary Greeks, Italians etc. I know this racial theory of “blood contamination leading to stupidity”, but it doesn’t hold water. Iran from 500-300 BC was significantly less powerful than Iran from the 8th to the 18th C, from creativity (Al Khwarizmi, Omar Khayyam, Hafiz, Rumi,..) to the military expansion (Nadir Shah & the rest). Contemporary Iranians excel in science and technology, lunatic religious ideology aside.

    If you don’t want to become ill-suited for civilization:

    a) don’t mix with Africans

    b) don’t take Islam seriously

    •�Thanks: bomag
    •�Replies: @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Both Italy and Greece are whiter than Iran.
  160. @Jonathan Mason
    @Anonymous

    Black people watch movies. Black people want to see heroes (or villains) who look like them. It is that simple.

    For the same reason there are a lot of middle-aged female detectives on TV.

    Replies: @Ministry Of Tongues

    It is that simple.

    No, it isn’t. There is a world of difference between “We want stories about us” and “All stories must be about us.”

    •�Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @Ministry Of Tongues

    "There is a world of difference between “We want stories about us” and “All stories must be about us.”"

    A good point; but really, if you want to get down to it, it's actually more like, "All of *your* stories must now be about *us*."

    I don't know if Steve agrees with this, but it would be interesting to see him put his film-critic hat on and do an overview of the latest fad: the Jordan Peele-led "Black! horror movie" craze. My feeling is, none of these movies work as horror, or even *can* work (especially not "Get Out"), because culturally blacks have no horror tradition to build out from, and specifically no tradition of the Gothic or of the uncanny (hell, it's *all* uncanny -- see Amos Tutuole); and no interesting science fiction either, because no actual science in the first place. The subtext of all these movies is --you guess it-- slabery, once again, as if that's really something to be afraid of in this day and age, but what else they got?; and maybe those dopey black-specific superstitions, like being weirdly unusually afraid of snakes (is that even true, or do they just fake it because it's an identity-reinforcement thing?).

    Horror, like comedy, works because it warps the straight line. The problem is that blacks believe so many ridiculously stupid, patently false things, that for them, there is no straight line to begin with.

    Replies: @Anon, @Ministry Of Tongues
  161. @guest007
    @J.Ross

    What is the basis of the claim on Thomas Jefferson?

    Replies: @J.Ross

    An old black propaganda slur from an election, plus modern black credulity. The basis of the rebuttal is a conference of historians.

    •�Replies: @guest007
    @J.Ross

    Here is a cite that says that genetic analysis along with timeline plotting shows that there is a good chance that Jefferson father some of Hennings children.

    https://www.monticello.org/thomas-jefferson/jefferson-slavery/thomas-jefferson-and-sally-hemings-a-brief-account/
  162. Steve, in reference to your Johnny Carson Substack post:

    I’m going to go back to running a higher proportion of paywalled items. The way Substack works is that you only get to post comments on a paywalled item if you have a paying subscription.

    Or I can make items readable all the way through by everybody and let anybody post comments.

    Unfortunately, Substack doesn’t let me compromise by allowing everybody to comment but only paying subscribers to see the entire post.

    Does Substack let you compromise by making items readable all the way through but restricting comments to paying subscribers? That would be the ideal. I still think you are overdoing the paywall thing. What you want to maximize your influence by maximizing the number of readers; paying subscribers will follow if you give them just a little extra, like commenting and occasional hidden posts.

    •�Replies: @anonymous
    @jb

    Most Substack writers seem to open their locked posts or podcasts after a week or two. Even those on Patreon to do this. I do a podcast with a partner on Patreon and that's what I do. It doesn't seem to affect garnering new subscribers. Plus, months from now, someone searching for information on a topic I've commented on will be able to find me who otherwise wouldn't. That person may become a subscriber. But Sailer doesn't do that. So a lot of his writing will be lost to casual readers who might have become subscribers.
    Of course, how he runs his business is none of my business.

    Replies: @anonymous
  163. @Bardon Kaldian
    @The Germ Theory of Disease


    WG Sebald once posed the thought experiment, “Who was the last person alive who actually, really believed in Zeus?”
    It depends. It is certain that Aristotle, 300 BC, did not literally believe in Zeus. But he gave a copy of "Iliad" to Alexander.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Dutch Boy

    The Iliad is full of good stuff beyond faith in the gods — indeed, if faith in the gods was the goal, then the Iliad would probably be the last text you’d want to hand out.

  164. @Rohirrimborn
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    In the early eighties when I lived in Chicago I had a friend of Syrian ancestry. His grandparents arrived in the early 20th century. He resembled a Caddyshack Rodney Dangerfield. He actually knew the Syrian language a bit. Once we were out in downtown and a car of a recently arrived (from Syria) middle aged couple stopped and asked for directions. We couldn't help them and the woman complained to her husband in Syrian about dumb Americans. They were shocked and embarrassed when my buddy started talking Syrian to them. They were profusely apologetic and courteous after that.

    Replies: @Mike Tre, @kaganovitch

    Not to quibble but they were speaking “Syrian”? I thought Syrians spoke Arabic.

    •�Replies: @Odyssey
    @Mike Tre

    So, lohohohol, who were Emperor Justinian, his uncle Emperor Justin and his general Belisarius?

    Replies: @Mike Tre
  165. As far as the Western half of the empire goes, Latin became the sacred language in much of Western Europe for a long time, until the 1960s for Catholic Europe.

    ATMs in Vatican City use it. Inserito scidulam quæso ut faciundam cognoscas rationem.

    Remember to use the ecclesiastical pronuniation, not the classical, let alone the English legal kind. (All three are defensible in their own spheres, but ridiculous in the others’.)

    Note, too, the lack of a ligature. Does it run on Windows 3.0?

    Romanians are interesting in having a Latin derived language but Orthodox religion, so in some way they bridge the two spheres.

    Except nobody has paid any attention to Romanians since the heyday of a certain Count.

  166. anon[370] •�Disclaimer says:
    @RedPill Boomer
    The Romans hated a certain ethnic group on the eastern shore of the Mediterranean, the only group who wouldn't tolerate their culture or religion. I'm sure they were actual jealous of their monotheism.

    Replies: @anon

    Some of them maybe, but is this not a myth though? 6 million Jews were living in the Roman Empire, but outside Israel, mainly in Italy and Southern Europe. In contrast, only about 500,000 lived in Judea. The Jews also intermarried with the Roman elite and their God Yaweh conquered Roman paganism. During Greco-Roman times, recorded mass conversions led to 6 million people practicing Judaism in Roman times or up to 10% of the population of the Roman Empire.

    •�Replies: @mc23
    @anon

    Few people realize that the vast majority of Israeli Jews probably derive from people, perhaps Phoenicians from southern Lebanon, who lived outside of Judea before the birth of Jesus of Nazareth and that after the destruction of the second temple Christianized Jews may have ended up been the majority of Jews in Palestine. They certainly were the majority a hundred years before Constantine became emperor.
  167. @Bardon Kaldian
    @The Germ Theory of Disease


    WG Sebald once posed the thought experiment, “Who was the last person alive who actually, really believed in Zeus?”
    It depends. It is certain that Aristotle, 300 BC, did not literally believe in Zeus. But he gave a copy of "Iliad" to Alexander.

    Replies: @J.Ross, @Dutch Boy

    Aristotle was a philosophical monotheist, in that he believed that there was one ultimate cause or prime mover.

  168. anon[129] •�Disclaimer says:
    @Coconuts
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms


    For white Europeans to claim Roman heritage solely for themselves is completely shameless.
    As far as the Western half of the empire goes, Latin became the sacred language in much of Western Europe for a long time, until the 1960s for Catholic Europe. So that is ~1500 years when it was in daily use all over that area. Religion used to be more central in life and people were praying and reading in Latin all of the time, religious material but also surviving Roman authors. 

    And their religion was about how God became incarnate in the world in the time of Divus Augustus, and Christ acknowledged the political authority of Caesar. Dante wrote about how God blessed the Roman Empire in this way. 

    A large part of the population spoke languages derived from vulgar Latin in the rest of their life and were partly descended from Italian origin colonists who arrived during the time of the Roman Empire. They were still using Roman Law as one of their legal references, and writing philosophy, history and science in Latin until the 18th century.  

    The populations who didn't speak Latin derived languages tended to be influenced culturally by those who did. The ongoing presence of the Roman empire as a political reference point has already been mentioned in relation to Charlemagne. 

    We can compare that with the surviving Latin cultural legacy in North Africa and the Middle East, after the Arabs arrived with Islam and had been established for some centuries, or the Turks later on. Imo this is likely to be why, after a certain point in time, Western Europe became de facto the main carrier of the Latin Roman heritage. 

    In the East it would be centred on Greek speaking Christians and any remaining pagans. Since they have pratically gone by now from the Middle East and North Africa, this legacy has also ended up centred on Europe. Romanians are interesting in having a Latin derived language but Orthodox religion, so in some way they bridge the two spheres.

    Replies: @anon, @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    Romanians are interesting in having a Latin derived language

    Latin is a language originating from Dacia; ancient Dacian did not vanish mysteriously but is the common ancestor of both Latin and modern Romanian. Dacian, if you will, is Vulgar Latin, which preceded Classical Latin. A likely explanation for the fact that Dacia is also called Romania is that it—rather than Italy—was the original home of the Romans who founded Constantinople. The Roman language (Latin) remained the administrative language of the Eastern Empire until the sixth century AD, when it was abandoned for Greek, the language spoken by the majority of its subjects.

    •�Replies: @Odyssey
    @anon

    Totally meaningless. Latin was not a spoken language and no language was born from it. It was a provincial dialect of the province of Lazio that was taken over by the Vatican much later.

    The Dacians, as part of the indigenous peoples of Europe, spoke a Serbian dialect. It was only in the 19th century that the Jesuits, after 300 years of work, invented an artificial Romanian nation with an artificial Romanian language to separate the Russians from the Mediterranean.

    Even after several campaigns of purification, the artificial Romanian (which they call Esperanto based on Serbian) still has a quarter of Serbian words. Some Serbian Dacians (e.g. Galerius) were Roman emperors who built the city of Felix Romuliana in his birthplace in eastern Serbia. Galerius, who was Diocletian's son-in-law, issued an Edict of Tolerance of Christianity in Serdica (today Sophia), two years before Constantine.

    Replies: @Belis60
  169. @Jonathan Mason
    @The Germ Theory of Disease


    WG Sebald once posed the thought experiment, “Who was the last person alive who actually, really believed in Zeus?”
    I was in Crete earlier this year and Zeus was there, albeit sleeping.

    I therefore turned down the opportunity to visit his cave--apparently one of several that he has claimed as his home.

    As far as I am concerned Zeus is just as good as any God, given his interest in earthquakes, thunderstorms, and the price of olives. Certainly a lot more credible than Yahweh or Allah.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    Certainly a lot more credible than Yahweh or Allah.

    Yahweh, God, and Allah are just different names in various languages for the same thing. Excuse me, Thing.

    They may have widely– even wildly– differing views of the nature and desires of this Person. One Catholic priest even referred to “the alien god of Calvinism”. But one can carry this too far.

    •�Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
    @Reg Cæsar

    It's basically the same in all high traditions. And spontaneous experiences.

    Under the Ming dynasty (16th century) a disciple took up his dwelling beside a master who had been meditating for thirty years in a cave. One night, when going along a mountain path, the disciple “felt a light circulating inside his body, and heard a rumbling of thunder at the top of his head”. The mountain, the stream, the world and his own self disappeared. This experience lasted “as long as it takes five pinches of incense to burn”. Afterwards he felt that he had become an entirely different man and had been purified by his own Light.

    ................
    Similar though much briefer experience is described by Warner Allen in "The Timeless Moment" (1946); it took place between two successive notes of Beethoven’s Seventh Symphony and involved no conscious hiatus in listening to the music. Here is Warner Allen’s description: “I closed my eyes and watched a silver glow which shaped itself into a circle with a central focus brighter than the rest. The circle became a tunnel of light
    proceeding from some distant sun in the heart of the Self. Swiftly and smoothly I was borne through the tunnel and, as I went the light turned from silver to gold. There was an impression of drawing strength from a limitless sea of power and a sense of deepening peace. The light grew brighter, but was never dazzling or alarming. I came to a point where time and motion ceased ...I am absorbed in the Light of the Universe, in Reality glowing like fire with the knowledge of itself, without ceasing to be one and myself, merged like a drop of quicksilver in the Whole, yet still separate as a grain of sand in the desert. The peace that passes all understanding and the pulsating energy of Creation are one in the centre . . . where all opposites are reconciled”

    Replies: @kaganovitch
    , @Bill Jones
    @Reg Cæsar


    Yahweh, God, and Allah are just different names in various languages for the same thing. Excuse me, Thing.
    You are, of course, wrong.
    God is a generic term, Allah is a definitive term "There is no God but Allah" and Yahweh was a tribal Totem.
  170. @anon
    @Dutch Boy

    Southern Italians on average have more Middle Eastern ancestry than African, and more from North Africa than from sub Saharan Africa, and Middle Easterners do look pretty white. Italians also cluster very close with Ashkenazi Jews who of course also do look white.

    Human genetic diversity in Italy and southern Europe generally is higher than in other regions of Europe. And Italy appears to be a zone of sharp differentiation over small distances. When compared to other populations, Italians do not cluster all together, but are distributed among European and Mediterranean people. Southern Italians show a higher similarity with Middle Eastern, North African and Southern Balkan populations than northern ones.

    And Sicily and many parts of Southern Italy have similar genetics.

    Replies: @Dutch Boy

    My boss for years was an Italian guy whose people came from Naples. His skin was fairer than my Dutch/Norwegian hide and I have known other Italians in a similar condition. I assumed this was a legacy from the Goths, Lombards, and Gauls that inhabited/invaded Italy in the past.

    •�Replies: @anon
    @Dutch Boy

    Or their parents may have had kids with a trophy wife from the North.

    I have seen many of them have children with blond Russians, Polish, Romanian, Ukrainian women.
  171. @Twinkie
    @Reg Cæsar


    So there were two Roman Empires that lacked a Rome, one in the east and one in the north.
    The Holy Roman Empire was actually: Heiliges Römisches Reich Deutscher Nation/Sacrum Imperium Romanum Nationis Germaniae - Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation.

    And Byzantion/Constantinopolis was the Second Rome, so... It was Roman.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    At a Russian immersion class taught by (mostly) natives I attended back in the late Soviet era, a fellow student said he’d overheard a couple of the teachers referring to “Saint Petersburg”. Another replied that that was nothing; he had heard them talking of Constantinople.

    Lyrics by an Ulsterman, no less. Saint Petersburg would be back within seven years; Constantinople didn’t change until the lifetimes of the older teachers, so it wasn’t as radical (or reactionary) as we thought.

    •�Replies: @Isabel Archer
    @Reg Cæsar

    Thanks, Reg. It's a great song.
  172. This is the state of America, but Sailer is wondering when it’s okay to blacken European history?
    Hey, it’s okay when the celebrity is cool enough.

    No wonder his side keeps losing.

    •�Replies: @kaganovitch
    @Anonymous

    It was overturned on a legal technicality, not on substance of charge.

    Replies: @Jim Don Bob, @HA
  173. @Rohirrimborn
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    In the early eighties when I lived in Chicago I had a friend of Syrian ancestry. His grandparents arrived in the early 20th century. He resembled a Caddyshack Rodney Dangerfield. He actually knew the Syrian language a bit. Once we were out in downtown and a car of a recently arrived (from Syria) middle aged couple stopped and asked for directions. We couldn't help them and the woman complained to her husband in Syrian about dumb Americans. They were shocked and embarrassed when my buddy started talking Syrian to them. They were profusely apologetic and courteous after that.

    Replies: @Mike Tre, @kaganovitch

    We couldn’t help them and the woman complained to her husband in Syrian about dumb Americans. They were shocked and embarrassed when my buddy started talking Syrian to them. They were profusely apologetic and courteous after that.

    Is Syrian a language? I thought Syrians speak Arabic.

    •�Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
    @kaganovitch

    Probably modern Assyrian, Suret.
  174. Matt Gaetz has withdrawn his nomination.

    •�Replies: @Bill Jones
    @prosa123

    Which makes him free to be appointed to Rubio's Senate Seat when Rubio is confirmed.
    They don't just throw this shit together...
    , @Bardon Kaldian
    @prosa123

    As should 30-40% of Trump's first picks.
    , @Jonathan Mason
    @prosa123


    Matt Gaetz has withdrawn his nomination.
    Maybe he was offered a better job.
    , @Corpse Tooth
    @prosa123

    Was it his uncanny resemblance to Butt-Head?
  175. @Hannah Katz
    Kind of like the black Vikings shown in movies. Go figure.

    We were on vacation in Spain and Portugal and noticed other American tourists, including African American tourists. I would think instead of visiting Europe they would visit the lands of their ancestors, like Nigeria and Ghana. Or maybe they avoid them for the same reason we do. Not much to see, unclean conditions, and the likelihood of getting mugged.

    Replies: @Peter Akuleyev, @jb, @Bill Jones

    Maybe the Africans should go to India.
    Might make them feel better.

  176. @prosa123
    Matt Gaetz has withdrawn his nomination.

    Replies: @Bill Jones, @Bardon Kaldian, @Jonathan Mason, @Corpse Tooth

    Which makes him free to be appointed to Rubio’s Senate Seat when Rubio is confirmed.
    They don’t just throw this shit together…

  177. Hey, Denzel is cool. Let’s not be racist.

    •�Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @Anonymous

    I just threw up a little in my mouth.

    Can't wait for the second commercial, when it breaks down in the middle of the countryside.

    Replies: @Brutusale
    , @Grand Marquis de Sade
    @Anonymous

    A black guy driving a stick? Let’s get serious.
    , @YetAnotherAnon
    @Anonymous

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/nov/22/jaguar-new-branding-cars-donald-trump

    "Hats off to Jaguar’s ‘inclusive’ new branding: now people of all backgrounds won’t buy its cars"

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2024/11/22/jaguar-boss-says-criticism-advert-hatred-intolerance/

    "Jaguar boss says criticism of new advert is ‘vile hatred and intolerance’"
    , @AnotherDad
    @Anonymous

    Girls and homos.

    But somewhere up the chain there is a white man who was too brain-addled or too pussyified to just stand up and say "no".

    Unless white men start acting like men and take back control of the West--we're done.
  178. @kaganovitch
    @Rohirrimborn


    We couldn’t help them and the woman complained to her husband in Syrian about dumb Americans. They were shocked and embarrassed when my buddy started talking Syrian to them. They were profusely apologetic and courteous after that.
    Is Syrian a language? I thought Syrians speak Arabic.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian

    Probably modern Assyrian, Suret.

  179. @prosa123
    Matt Gaetz has withdrawn his nomination.

    Replies: @Bill Jones, @Bardon Kaldian, @Jonathan Mason, @Corpse Tooth

    As should 30-40% of Trump’s first picks.

  180. @Reg Cæsar
    @Jonathan Mason


    Certainly a lot more credible than Yahweh or Allah.
    Yahweh, God, and Allah are just different names in various languages for the same thing. Excuse me, Thing.


    They may have widely-- even wildly-- differing views of the nature and desires of this Person. One Catholic priest even referred to "the alien god of Calvinism". But one can carry this too far.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian, @Bill Jones

    It’s basically the same in all high traditions. And spontaneous experiences.

    Under the Ming dynasty (16th century) a disciple took up his dwelling beside a master who had been meditating for thirty years in a cave. One night, when going along a mountain path, the disciple “felt a light circulating inside his body, and heard a rumbling of thunder at the top of his head”. The mountain, the stream, the world and his own self disappeared. This experience lasted “as long as it takes five pinches of incense to burn”. Afterwards he felt that he had become an entirely different man and had been purified by his own Light.

    …………….
    Similar though much briefer experience is described by Warner Allen in “The Timeless Moment” (1946); it took place between two successive notes of Beethoven’s Seventh Symphony and involved no conscious hiatus in listening to the music. Here is Warner Allen’s description: “I closed my eyes and watched a silver glow which shaped itself into a circle with a central focus brighter than the rest. The circle became a tunnel of light
    proceeding from some distant sun in the heart of the Self. Swiftly and smoothly I was borne through the tunnel and, as I went the light turned from silver to gold. There was an impression of drawing strength from a limitless sea of power and a sense of deepening peace. The light grew brighter, but was never dazzling or alarming. I came to a point where time and motion ceased …I am absorbed in the Light of the Universe, in Reality glowing like fire with the knowledge of itself, without ceasing to be one and myself, merged like a drop of quicksilver in the Whole, yet still separate as a grain of sand in the desert. The peace that passes all understanding and the pulsating energy of Creation are one in the centre . . . where all opposites are reconciled”

    •�Replies: @kaganovitch
    @Bardon Kaldian

    So LSD was synthesized earlier than hitherto thought?

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  181. OT- Ukraine

    I just watched Piers Morgan for fun. This time, it was about Russian war in Ukraine. For any person with IQ higher than room temperature & maturity more than that of a spoiled child, matters are obvious just from this clip.

    The oldest guest is a retired general, a cautious man who actually didn’t say anything worth remembering.

    Then, it is Jake Broe, a strong supporter of Ukraine whom I respect & may disagree only on the strategy vs tactics issues. But his heart & mind are in the right place.

    Then you got two MAGA types, Benny and Scott, who are not just infantile, but they cannot behave. They are jumpy, hysterical & ill mannered. They are certainly not Russian bots, but Jake is, and here I agree with him, rightly says that there is some “homoerotic fixation” with Putin on the Trumpist side.

    This entertainment is not something serious; you don’t have nuances analyses etc. But for any mentally sane & normal person, it is obvious who is right- and who is wrong.

    •�Replies: @Old Prude
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Silly. Condoleeza Rice could probably make a far more articulate case for starting a war with Russia, than I could for a negotiated peace, but that doesn't make her right.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
    , @J.Ross
    @Bardon Kaldian

    So the sloppy mass murderer Elensky had a pop song written and dedicated to him, and was praised in every regime cheap editorial and political cartoon that nobody reads, but recognizing Putin was a real leader is homosexual? Dude, your side wrote him a song. You shouldn't be throwing that particular stone.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
    , @Mr. Anon
    @Bardon Kaldian


    The oldest guest is a retired general, a cautious man who actually didn’t say anything worth remembering.
    Probably how he made General.

    This entertainment is not something serious; you don’t have nuances analyses etc. But for any mentally sane & normal person, it is obvious who is right- and who is wrong.
    Yes, Piers Morgan, or his producers, picked the guests who would reinforce the image they wish to convey. You chose sane, rational exponents of the view you wish to promote, and unhinged, not-so-bright exponents of the view you wish to defame. It's the oldest trick in the media playbook.

    And you fell for it.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  182. Anonymous[426] •�Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous
    @Bardon Kaldian

    John Wayne played Genghis Khan in The Conqueror. The Swede Warner Oland and Anglo American Sidney Toller played Charlie Chan.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EHt0Pb8rkXU

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3FdoGvpcLw

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian, @Anonymous

    As silly as those casting decisions were, the movies were not saying that Genghis was white or Chan is white. Rather, they were cases of white people made up as Asians, much like blackface was about whites-as-blacks. Like what Robert Downey Jr. does in Tropic Thunder. He plays black.

    In contrast, the recent castings pretend that prominent European figures of the past were indeed blackity-black.

  183. @Mr. Anon
    Why would Ridley Scott feel the need to manufacture a fictional villain for his story when he has a perfectly real villain available - the Emperor Caracalla? I see from the imdb page that he is a character in the movie, but seemingly a secondary one. Caracalla was a real creep, even by the standards of Roman Emperors.

    I thought that Gladiator was a bloated, steaming load of crap. And nobody at the time seem to notice that it was largely ripped off from the 1964 epic The Fall of the Roman Empire. I'm sure that the sequel will be no better. So if Denzel Washington, however anachronistic his casting may be, can make the movie more entertaining, then good for him. He is a very entertaining actor, and as Steve pointed out, is good at playing bad guys.

    I find it strange that movies about Rome seem to focus almost entirely on Gladiators. They did other things too. It would be as if, 2,000 years in the future, all the movies (or whatever they have then) about 20th / 21st century America entirely revolved around pro Football.

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Jim Don Bob, @Jonathan Mason, @Wokechoke

    Macrinus briefly suceeeded Caracalla. A half Roman half Arab emperor.

    •�Replies: @Rohirrimborn
    @Wokechoke

    Macrinus was from North Africa long before the arrival of Arabs to that area. He was from a Berber family.
  184. It is worth noting that the museum’s false exhibit takes a page right out of Mao’s China. Mao recognized that many people, children especially, have a difficult time grasping political or historical concepts in the abstract, but are quite receptive when seeing a museum exhibit illustrating the idea. Seven years ago, how time flies, Yale’s Denise Ho wrote a great book called “Curating Revolution” that explored this idea in detail. This included the fact that the convincing artifact did not need to be a formal museum exhibit. Rather, an object could be seized from a person’s home, and somehow be successfully deemed to constitute “ironclad evidence” and “proof of crime.” (There is a Chinese word for the aforesaid quoted phrases, but I can’t remember the word.).

  185. @Moshe Def
    @Thomm

    Thank you, Nile Crocodile. What a good boy.

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease

    So… a people who couldn’t figure out how to overcome a crocodile were somehow nevertheless going to become the masters of the Mediterranean and Europe.

    Okay.

    •�Replies: @Mike Tre
    @The Germ Theory of Disease

    Oh they figured it out:

    https://youtube.com/shorts/4teArtT0bhc?si=8Y6Yvr9NvJ9UaZfV
  186. @prosa123
    Matt Gaetz has withdrawn his nomination.

    Replies: @Bill Jones, @Bardon Kaldian, @Jonathan Mason, @Corpse Tooth

    Matt Gaetz has withdrawn his nomination.

    Maybe he was offered a better job.

  187. @Coconuts
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms


    For white Europeans to claim Roman heritage solely for themselves is completely shameless.
    As far as the Western half of the empire goes, Latin became the sacred language in much of Western Europe for a long time, until the 1960s for Catholic Europe. So that is ~1500 years when it was in daily use all over that area. Religion used to be more central in life and people were praying and reading in Latin all of the time, religious material but also surviving Roman authors. 

    And their religion was about how God became incarnate in the world in the time of Divus Augustus, and Christ acknowledged the political authority of Caesar. Dante wrote about how God blessed the Roman Empire in this way. 

    A large part of the population spoke languages derived from vulgar Latin in the rest of their life and were partly descended from Italian origin colonists who arrived during the time of the Roman Empire. They were still using Roman Law as one of their legal references, and writing philosophy, history and science in Latin until the 18th century.  

    The populations who didn't speak Latin derived languages tended to be influenced culturally by those who did. The ongoing presence of the Roman empire as a political reference point has already been mentioned in relation to Charlemagne. 

    We can compare that with the surviving Latin cultural legacy in North Africa and the Middle East, after the Arabs arrived with Islam and had been established for some centuries, or the Turks later on. Imo this is likely to be why, after a certain point in time, Western Europe became de facto the main carrier of the Latin Roman heritage. 

    In the East it would be centred on Greek speaking Christians and any remaining pagans. Since they have pratically gone by now from the Middle East and North Africa, this legacy has also ended up centred on Europe. Romanians are interesting in having a Latin derived language but Orthodox religion, so in some way they bridge the two spheres.

    Replies: @anon, @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    after a certain point in time, Western Europe became de facto the main carrier of the Latin Roman heritage.

    Maybe. But what is that “point in time”? For most of Early Middle Ages Europe was illiterate.

    Charlemagne’s empire was not sound or durable was it? It fragmented among his heirs and lapsed into feudalism.

    Whereas Eastern Empire maintained institutional continuity and undertook revivals under Justinian and Irene.

    A large part of the population spoke languages derived from vulgar Latin

    Why does that matter? Vulgar Latin failed to maintain the ancient Indo-European case system. Such that someone like Heidegger claimed that philosophy can only be done in Greek and German.

    We can compare that with the surviving Latin cultural legacy in North Africa and the Middle East, after the Arabs arrived with Islam

    The ancient classics were in Greek. But for many centuries Germans were not interested in learning were they? Thus that there were very few Greek texts in Europe until the Renaissance.

    Learning was carried on by Muslims who translated from Greek to Arabic, such that later Europeans had to learn Arabic to read both the original works and the Muslim commentaries.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmission_of_the_Greek_Classics

    Thus the Islamic world was the de facto the main carrier of classical learning, from 8th to 13th CE, wasn’t it? Until Mongols sacked Baghdad.

    they have pratically gone by now from the Middle East and North Africa,

    The Byzantine scholars brought along their Greek texts, to the West where it largely didn’t exist due to destruction by Germanic barbarians.

    But what if Constantinople hadn’t been sacked, would the Renaissance even have taken place?

    Constantinople and Baghdad were both sacked by the most formidable warriors in premodern era– Eurasian nomads. Europe is in the corner of Eurasia and happens to be insulated.

    •�Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    Really confusing.

    Muslims translated only some parts that were useful- Galen, Euclid & parts of Aristotle & Plotinus. They did not inherit the culture, from sculpture and aesthetics to spiritual orientation.

    The Latin west was simply richer & priests copied manuscripts that frequently run contrary to their beliefs. That's why works of Tacitus, Caesar, Virgil, Horace, Lucretius, Juvenal, Ovid, ...survive. They absorbed pseudo-Dionysius through Scotus Erigena, the most original thinker between 500 and 1000 in the world. They also developed visual arts, especially in manuscripts & later sculptures, as well as music around 900.- Hildegard of Bingen.

    Both Islam and Byzantium clearly lagged in the intellectual production from the 500 to 1300, although, especially Islam, was more technologically advanced.

    But mentally, except a few fields like parts of nascent sciences, they were limited by their dogmas and not interested in the varieties of human mental experience.

    Islamic best minds were not bold nor imaginative enough. They did have a golden age with better food & comparable architecture, perhaps better sewer system etc.- but they don't have civilizational continuity with what was Greco-Roman Antiguity, neither in letters, thought, unquenchable humanism, artistic culture and human values.

    Islam & Byzantium remained mired in mysticism and oriental despotism.

    Especially after Europe exploded after 1300. Dante, Eckhart, Hildegard and Giotto were active before anything happened to Constantinople.

    Replies: @Alden
    , @Reg Cæsar
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms


    For most of Early Middle Ages Europe was illiterate.
    No, it wasn't. There were monks, scribes, clerks, even scholars. Alcuin didn't reinvent the alphabet.

    You are carrying on the "dark ages" fallacy. Next you'll be telling us Columbus "discovered" the roundness of the world.

    Replies: @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    , @Coconuts
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms


    But what is that “point in time”?
    Why is this important?

    You seemed to be challenging the idea that contemporary white Europeans should claim the Roman heritage solely for themselves, but who at the moment is challenging them for it? Is it part of the collective imagination of any other group that is interested in laying claim to it and carrying it forward?

    I was offering an explanation of why I thought white Europeans tend think like this about it, more than trying to justify this fact. Is there some authority people should look to to determine what is legitimate use of historical memory and cultural heritage?

    As I said in my post I suspect a lot of it is related to religion. This is the reason white Europeans from a Christian background still retain it as a significant cultural and political reference point, at the same time the fact that the Middle East has mostly adopted Islam will be an important explanation for why it doesn't figure as the same reference point in their collective imagination. And the decline of Greek and Latin in the Middle East in favour of Arabic and Turkish.

    Language will be another part of the explanation for the greater identification with Rome's heritage in Europe, because people want to understand (or are taught) the origin and history of their language and they find it in Rome and Greece. That will lead on to people in various parts of Europe realising that they are also likely to be descendants of one time inhabitants of the Roman Empire.

    Replies: @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
  188. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    The Roman emperors looked like this.

    https://www.worldhistory.org/uploads/images/12993.jpg

    Caracalla in the film look closer to Denzel Washington than the actor who played him

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/33/Sundance_Film_Festival_2024_-_Fred_Hechinger-104A1882_%28cropped%29.jpg

    The original Gladiator began with the Romans fighting the Germanic barbarians, the ancestors to most white Americans.

    He says to Russell Crowe: Ihr seid verfluchte hunde! "You are cursed dogs!" White Americans should be proud of their ancestors who resisted Roman conquest.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fuUnd9Db6Hg

    In actuality, the Roman Empire survived for another 284 years.
    That's completely false. Roman Empire survived for another 1261 years after Commodus.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Empire

    But you deliberate obfuscate that because the modern lands of the Eastern empire are full of brown people that you want keep out of Europe right?

    Replies: @BB753, @Peter Akuleyev, @Dmon, @Wokechoke, @Dutch Boy, @anon, @Odyssey, @anon

    It is a pity that the series of emperors in the picture is interrupted before reaching Diocletian, so we could see about 20 Serbian emperors (Constantine, Galerius, Licinius, Maximian, Justinian, etc.).

    However, there are still several Serbian emperors in this picture – Decius, Thrax, Probus, Quintilius, Herennius Etruscus, Hostilian, Aurelian (&Ulpia Severina), Claudius Gothicus.

    Among them (when the picture is enlarged) the figures of, for example, Quintilius, Claudius and Probus can still be found daily on the streets of Serbian cities.

  189. William Kirk gives a warning today for anyone deciding to 3D print firearms or firearms parts, as it appears that several tech companies will not only try to prevent this activity, but might report you to the authorities as well.

    The Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued a powerful decision in favor of the state’s preemption laws, which had been attacked by anti-gun supporters.

  190. @anon
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    But how real was Roman Antiquity though?

    How much of what the film claims to know about Rome is real?

    Reading this article one gets the impression that we don't really know much about it:

    https://www.unz.com/article/how-fake-is-roman-antiquity/

    Replies: @David Davenport

    How much of what the film claims to know about Rome is real?

    Reading this article one gets the impression that we don’t really know much about it:

    https://www.unz.com/article/how-fake-is-roman-antiquity/

    Maybe you shouldn’t believe everything you read in unz.com.

  191. Does anybody else find it ironic that we’re debating whether it’s historically accurate for Denzel Washington to be in the movie when he’s playing a bisexual bad guy that gets buttfu*#ed by a centaur in the movie?

  192. @BB753
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    There are plenty of reconstructions of Caracalla. None paint him as an African.
    https://youtu.be/RAuYw1jpL_U?si=HV7c3jBOc3KM94X9

    You forgot to mention that many Germanic tribes had been living in the Empire for centuries and that they were thoroughly romanized.
    For instance, the Visigoths, Vandals and Ostrogoths were heterodox Christians ( arians), not pagans.

    Not sure where you get the idea that Anatolians and Syrians were swarthy brown people.

    Replies: @Odyssey

    Visigoths, Vandals and Ostrogoths were Serbian speaking tribes, not Germanic.
    Do you know when the Germanic tribes came from Asia to Europe? There are many historical forgeries, such as that the ancestors of today’s Germans were Aryans and Goths. Today’s Germans got this name from the natives of today’s Germany, and I have already established that not a single German at unz knows the meaning of their name.

    •�Replies: @Mike Tre
    @Odyssey

    For those that don’t know, Odyssey here believes the entirety of humanity is descended from a single Serbian vagina back in the days of the Garden of Eden (according to Ody, Eden translates to Serbia in Serbian).

    I suggest skimming through his comment history, especially the replies he gets. Worth a few laughs.

    Replies: @Odyssey, @Dmon
    , @Tiptoethrutulips
    @Odyssey


    Do you know when the Germanic tribes came from Asia to Europe?
    When did those non-Germanic, yet Slavic Russians evolve from those very same Asiatic Steppes?

    Whence came the Celts?

    and I have already established that not a single German at unz knows the meaning of their name.
    You have established that you are ridiculous and that you tend to scurry off when challenged.

    German = Serbian: nemački; Russian: немeцкий; Czech: německy

    Russian немой [nemoy] means "mute / one who can't speak..." or “stupid/dumb.”

    So what? Name a monument(s) in Turkish Serbia that rivals those built by the “stupid” Germanics of Deutschland.

    I want the translations of those Vincan scripts, Odysseus….
  193. @Dmon
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    Wow - do you have the complete set of Topps Emperor Rookie cards? All I"ve been able to find is the commemorative reproduction set issued by Justinian in the 500's, and they had replaced the official photographs with artists drawings then - Belisarius's card makes him look like a Mexican cartel boss.

    Replies: @Odyssey

    Emperor Justinian and his general Belisarius were Serbs.

    •�LOL: Mike Tre
    •�Replies: @Steve Sailer
    @Odyssey

    The late Classical age was dominated by hard men from the Balkans.

    Replies: @Odyssey, @Buzz Mohawk
    , @Dmon
    @Odyssey

    Do you mean they were born in what is now Serbia, or do you mean they were ethnic Serbs? Belisarius was (according to wikipedia) probably born in what is now Bulgaria. The Byzantine emperors had a fractious relationship with actual Bulgarians, but the later Imperial army (particularly from the 11th century on) generally employed a number of Bulgarian mercenaries. It is a little known fact that Tom Lehrer's "It Makes a Fellow Proud to be a Soldier" was not an original composition, but was actually based on a fragment of an old Byzantine army marching song:

    "Now Nicephorous Phocas is the boss of all us jerks.
    He doesn't really like it when we lose against the Turks.
    So we give 'em the Greek Fire. It's not sporting - but it works.
    It makes a fellow proud to be a Buuull-gar."

    I'm willing to entertain the idea that Belisarius was Hungarian though.

    Belisarius:
    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8b/Belisarius_mosaic.jpg

    Al Hrabosky:
    https://www.cooperstownexpert.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Al-Hrabosky-e1649276116541.jpg

    Replies: @Odyssey
  194. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    @Coconuts


    after a certain point in time, Western Europe became de facto the main carrier of the Latin Roman heritage.
    Maybe. But what is that "point in time"? For most of Early Middle Ages Europe was illiterate.

    Charlemagne's empire was not sound or durable was it? It fragmented among his heirs and lapsed into feudalism.

    Whereas Eastern Empire maintained institutional continuity and undertook revivals under Justinian and Irene.

    A large part of the population spoke languages derived from vulgar Latin
    Why does that matter? Vulgar Latin failed to maintain the ancient Indo-European case system. Such that someone like Heidegger claimed that philosophy can only be done in Greek and German.

    We can compare that with the surviving Latin cultural legacy in North Africa and the Middle East, after the Arabs arrived with Islam
    The ancient classics were in Greek. But for many centuries Germans were not interested in learning were they? Thus that there were very few Greek texts in Europe until the Renaissance.

    Learning was carried on by Muslims who translated from Greek to Arabic, such that later Europeans had to learn Arabic to read both the original works and the Muslim commentaries.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmission_of_the_Greek_Classics

    Thus the Islamic world was the de facto the main carrier of classical learning, from 8th to 13th CE, wasn't it? Until Mongols sacked Baghdad.

    they have pratically gone by now from the Middle East and North Africa,
    The Byzantine scholars brought along their Greek texts, to the West where it largely didn't exist due to destruction by Germanic barbarians.

    But what if Constantinople hadn't been sacked, would the Renaissance even have taken place?

    Constantinople and Baghdad were both sacked by the most formidable warriors in premodern era-- Eurasian nomads. Europe is in the corner of Eurasia and happens to be insulated.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian, @Reg Cæsar, @Coconuts

    Really confusing.

    Muslims translated only some parts that were useful- Galen, Euclid & parts of Aristotle & Plotinus. They did not inherit the culture, from sculpture and aesthetics to spiritual orientation.

    The Latin west was simply richer & priests copied manuscripts that frequently run contrary to their beliefs. That’s why works of Tacitus, Caesar, Virgil, Horace, Lucretius, Juvenal, Ovid, …survive. They absorbed pseudo-Dionysius through Scotus Erigena, the most original thinker between 500 and 1000 in the world. They also developed visual arts, especially in manuscripts & later sculptures, as well as music around 900.- Hildegard of Bingen.

    Both Islam and Byzantium clearly lagged in the intellectual production from the 500 to 1300, although, especially Islam, was more technologically advanced.

    But mentally, except a few fields like parts of nascent sciences, they were limited by their dogmas and not interested in the varieties of human mental experience.

    Islamic best minds were not bold nor imaginative enough. They did have a golden age with better food & comparable architecture, perhaps better sewer system etc.- but they don’t have civilizational continuity with what was Greco-Roman Antiguity, neither in letters, thought, unquenchable humanism, artistic culture and human values.

    Islam & Byzantium remained mired in mysticism and oriental despotism.

    Especially after Europe exploded after 1300. Dante, Eckhart, Hildegard and Giotto were active before anything happened to Constantinople.

    •�Replies: @Alden
    @Bardon Kaldian

    The Muslim alleged golden age was about 400 years after their conquest of the ancient cultures of Egypt Greece Rome Assyria Mesopotamia Persia etc and the destruction of those cultures by Islam

    It was not Muslim Arabs that copied and preserved the ancient writings. It was Christian Arab monks in their monastic libraries who did all the copying and preservation. Which they began in the late 200s AD before Rome legalized Christianity

    As the Caliph of Baghdad Haroun Al Raschid said to the the librarians of the Alexandria library when they tried to prevent him from using the books and scrolls for firewood.” There is but one book and that is the holy Koran”
  195. @Jim Don Bob
    @Mr. Anon

    Romans also invented self healing concrete some of which is still standing 2000 years later. But it's hard to make a movie about concrete.

    https://news.mit.edu/2023/roman-concrete-durability-lime-casts-0106

    Replies: @muggles

    Romans also invented self healing concrete some of which is still standing 2000 years later. But it’s hard to make a movie about concrete.

    There are no bad plots, just lazy writers and directors.

    I’m thinking some time lapse photography might be useful…

    •�Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @muggles



    But it’s hard to make a movie about concrete.
    I’m thinking some time lapse photography might be useful…
    Was Brutalism a film genre as well?
  196. @Santoculto
    @IHTG

    Darker doesnt mean racially subsaharian. Like they may had an olive skin and semitic features, even thought i have no problem if ancient Egyptians were kind of "Black", if they were a different and currently extinct breed than the negroid variant of today. The same way happened with ancient Romans and Greeks.

    Replies: @mc23

    It’s a shame that desire to please and ingratiate a politically correct academia and those who sponsor it leads to spurious race science. Thankfully it may be passing. For example, some more recent constructions of Cheddar Man in England have moved from portraying him with black skin to merely being dark, more in keeping with Early European farmers out of Anatolia and Persia.

    https://twitter.com/Sulkalmakh/status/1858163182440693941/photo/2

  197. There were certainly Blacks in the ancient classical world. Cleopatra for instance is depicted with several distinctly Black handmaidens and Black gladiators are known, but while the Nubian and Kush kingdoms are interesting by themselves, they weren’t the driving forces in ancient Egypt’s history.

    Our legacy media has lost the trust of half the country. Organizations like the Met Museum shouldn’t presume on public trust. They aren’t the gatekeepers they once were and at some point, a loss of confidence in the ability to carry out their mission will have disappointing consequences among those who appreciate them. And for what? Conflating East Africa, along with Berber tribesmen and Semitic colonists in North Africa with the entire continent is just a con game in the end. We can appreciate pre-conquest societies in the Americas for their own sake and we should adopt that view in Africa.

    •�Replies: @Odyssey
    @mc23

    Cleopatra was the last member of the Ptolemaic dynasty. Ptolemy himself was given Egypt to rule after the poisoning of Alexander the Great. Alexander himself, as well as his dukes/generals - Seleucus (who gained Persia), Cassander (who gained the Balkans), and Ptolemy were Serbs, although those who are quite late in mental development think that Alexander was Greek.

    Replies: @AnotherDad, @Apostolos, @mc23
    , @Alden
    @mc23

    Cleopatra’s black maids were slaves imported from Sudan etc. why bother discussing the anti Whute anti European people’s anti Christian civilization lies written by communists Jews and progressives Just assume it’s all lies and like the NYTimes the opposite is true.

    You know 100 years ago all the anti White scientists were convinced that White skin meant that Whites were the most primitive race closest to animals. Because animals are covered with hair and fur and their skin is pale White.

    Now the theory is that Europeans were dark brown like Africans until about 1,000 BC.

    It’s all anti White anti European peoples anti Christian lies not worth discussing. How can you believe the lie that cheddar man had any shade of dark skin during the ice age? It’s all lies
    , @Alden
    @mc23

    The Smithsonian is the absolute worst. What can one expect of an 100 percent White hating affirmative action government museum. The gay trans White perverts are more anti White than the blacks browns and tabs. Being anti White is a prerequisite for a government job.
  198. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    @Coconuts


    after a certain point in time, Western Europe became de facto the main carrier of the Latin Roman heritage.
    Maybe. But what is that "point in time"? For most of Early Middle Ages Europe was illiterate.

    Charlemagne's empire was not sound or durable was it? It fragmented among his heirs and lapsed into feudalism.

    Whereas Eastern Empire maintained institutional continuity and undertook revivals under Justinian and Irene.

    A large part of the population spoke languages derived from vulgar Latin
    Why does that matter? Vulgar Latin failed to maintain the ancient Indo-European case system. Such that someone like Heidegger claimed that philosophy can only be done in Greek and German.

    We can compare that with the surviving Latin cultural legacy in North Africa and the Middle East, after the Arabs arrived with Islam
    The ancient classics were in Greek. But for many centuries Germans were not interested in learning were they? Thus that there were very few Greek texts in Europe until the Renaissance.

    Learning was carried on by Muslims who translated from Greek to Arabic, such that later Europeans had to learn Arabic to read both the original works and the Muslim commentaries.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmission_of_the_Greek_Classics

    Thus the Islamic world was the de facto the main carrier of classical learning, from 8th to 13th CE, wasn't it? Until Mongols sacked Baghdad.

    they have pratically gone by now from the Middle East and North Africa,
    The Byzantine scholars brought along their Greek texts, to the West where it largely didn't exist due to destruction by Germanic barbarians.

    But what if Constantinople hadn't been sacked, would the Renaissance even have taken place?

    Constantinople and Baghdad were both sacked by the most formidable warriors in premodern era-- Eurasian nomads. Europe is in the corner of Eurasia and happens to be insulated.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian, @Reg Cæsar, @Coconuts

    For most of Early Middle Ages Europe was illiterate.

    No, it wasn’t. There were monks, scribes, clerks, even scholars. Alcuin didn’t reinvent the alphabet.

    You are carrying on the “dark ages” fallacy. Next you’ll be telling us Columbus “discovered” the roundness of the world.

    •�Replies: @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    @Reg Cæsar


    While it is impossible to calculate literacy rates in pre-modern Islamic societies, it is almost certain that they were relatively high, at least in comparison to their European counterparts.[49]
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_Golden_Age

    The question of Charlemagne's literacy is debated, with little direct evidence from contemporary sources.

    Historian Johannes Fried considers it likely that Charlemagne would have been able to read,[47] but the medievalist Paul Dutton writes that "the evidence for his ability to read is circumstantial and inferential at best"[48] and concludes that it is likely that he never properly mastered the skill.[49] Einhard makes no direct mention of Charlemagne reading, and recorded that he only attempted to learn to write later in life.[50]
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlemagne#Early_life_and_rise_to_power

    Byzantium's great intellectual achievement was the Corpus Juris Civilis ("Body of Civil Law"), a massive compilation of Roman law made under Justinian (r. 528–65). The work includes a section called the Digesta which abstracts the principles of Roman law in such a way that they can be applied to any situation.

    The level of literacy was considerably higher in the Byzantine Empire than in the Latin West.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_Middle_Ages

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  199. @muggles
    @Jim Don Bob


    Romans also invented self healing concrete some of which is still standing 2000 years later. But it’s hard to make a movie about concrete.
    There are no bad plots, just lazy writers and directors.

    I'm thinking some time lapse photography might be useful...

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    But it’s hard to make a movie about concrete.

    I’m thinking some time lapse photography might be useful…

    Was Brutalism a film genre as well?

  200. Maybe Scott’s next effort as a director will be a sequel toThe Duellists. Scott could cast Denzel Washington as the elderly Feraud.

    D’Hubert and Feraud could continue their pistol duels in Vibrant America, typically missing each other but unfortunately hitting everyone else, illustrating Sailer’s Law of Mass Shootings.

    The Duellists – Final Duel: Pistols in the Ruins

    •�LOL: kaganovitch, mc23
    •�Replies: @Jim Don Bob
    @Voltarde

    +10 on The Duellists.

    I saw it when it first came out. I watched it again recently and it was as good as I remembered.
  201. @Odyssey
    @Dmon

    Emperor Justinian and his general Belisarius were Serbs.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Dmon

    The late Classical age was dominated by hard men from the Balkans.

    •�Replies: @Odyssey
    @Steve Sailer

    Exactly, bravo Steve. Their descendants are now playing basketball in the NBA. Emperor Maximinus Trax was 8 feet tall (NBA: Manute Bol - 7ft 7in, Yao Ming - 7ft 6in)

    For example, all the Tetrarchy emperors were Serbs - Diocletian, Maximian, Severus, Galerius, Maxentius, M.Dazza, Constance Chlorus (Constantine's father), Constantine, Licinius, etc., etc. Justin, Justinian (and his general Belisarius), etc.

    The next 6 min video shows generated faces of several emperors from the Tetrarchy period. They were all Serbs, but few people know that.

    It is a great benefit for those who follow Steve's texts to be able to identify some forgeries related to the Roman Empire, and there are really a lot of them in the comments of some readers.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9L1F8EgcUM
    , @Buzz Mohawk
    @Steve Sailer

    As the girls in Boulder used to say, "a hard man is good to find."
  202. @Dutch Boy
    @anon

    My boss for years was an Italian guy whose people came from Naples. His skin was fairer than my Dutch/Norwegian hide and I have known other Italians in a similar condition. I assumed this was a legacy from the Goths, Lombards, and Gauls that inhabited/invaded Italy in the past.

    Replies: @anon

    Or their parents may have had kids with a trophy wife from the North.

    I have seen many of them have children with blond Russians, Polish, Romanian, Ukrainian women.

  203. @Anonymous
    Hey, Denzel is cool. Let's not be racist.

    https://twitter.com/landofangle/status/1859321734320763133

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Grand Marquis de Sade, @YetAnotherAnon, @AnotherDad

    I just threw up a little in my mouth.

    Can’t wait for the second commercial, when it breaks down in the middle of the countryside.

    •�Replies: @Brutusale
    @The Germ Theory of Disease

    Aston Martin knows its customers.
    https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/Gc2ClspWEAAhHVw.jpg?itok=SNMWFXxQ

    Replies: @Ralph L, @Je Suis Omar Mateen, @Corvinus, @Mr. Anon, @AnotherDad
  204. @Steve Sailer
    @Odyssey

    The late Classical age was dominated by hard men from the Balkans.

    Replies: @Odyssey, @Buzz Mohawk

    Exactly, bravo Steve. Their descendants are now playing basketball in the NBA. Emperor Maximinus Trax was 8 feet tall (NBA: Manute Bol – 7ft 7in, Yao Ming – 7ft 6in)

    For example, all the Tetrarchy emperors were Serbs – Diocletian, Maximian, Severus, Galerius, Maxentius, M.Dazza, Constance Chlorus (Constantine’s father), Constantine, Licinius, etc., etc. Justin, Justinian (and his general Belisarius), etc.

    The next 6 min video shows generated faces of several emperors from the Tetrarchy period. They were all Serbs, but few people know that.

    It is a great benefit for those who follow Steve’s texts to be able to identify some forgeries related to the Roman Empire, and there are really a lot of them in the comments of some readers.

  205. @mc23
    There were certainly Blacks in the ancient classical world. Cleopatra for instance is depicted with several distinctly Black handmaidens and Black gladiators are known, but while the Nubian and Kush kingdoms are interesting by themselves, they weren't the driving forces in ancient Egypt’s history.

    Our legacy media has lost the trust of half the country. Organizations like the Met Museum shouldn’t presume on public trust. They aren’t the gatekeepers they once were and at some point, a loss of confidence in the ability to carry out their mission will have disappointing consequences among those who appreciate them. And for what? Conflating East Africa, along with Berber tribesmen and Semitic colonists in North Africa with the entire continent is just a con game in the end. We can appreciate pre-conquest societies in the Americas for their own sake and we should adopt that view in Africa.

    Replies: @Odyssey, @Alden, @Alden

    Cleopatra was the last member of the Ptolemaic dynasty. Ptolemy himself was given Egypt to rule after the poisoning of Alexander the Great. Alexander himself, as well as his dukes/generals – Seleucus (who gained Persia), Cassander (who gained the Balkans), and Ptolemy were Serbs, although those who are quite late in mental development think that Alexander was Greek.

    •�Replies: @AnotherDad
    @Odyssey


    Cleopatra was the last member of the Ptolemaic dynasty. Ptolemy himself was given Egypt to rule after the poisoning of Alexander the Great. Alexander himself, as well as his dukes/generals – Seleucus (who gained Persia), Cassander (who gained the Balkans), and Ptolemy were Serbs, although those who are quite late in mental development think that Alexander was Greek.
    Serbs? LOL. Everyone--above the mental age of 3--knows Alex and his generals were Irish.
    , @Apostolos
    @Odyssey


    those who are quite late in mental development think that Alexander was Greek.
    HUH ?

    How come the late in mental development Hellenes speak the most complete almost heavenly language ?

    And the language of the supossedly superior Slavs is in comparison of dubious mentality.

    You know I have only for people believing this (including you) a huge seaside lot in Jupiter dirt cheap and with infinite installments.
    , @mc23
    @Odyssey

    I agree Cleopatra was Greek, she is depicted with few a Black servants among a crowd of Egyptians.

    Replies: @Odyssey
  206. @BB753
    Here's all you need to know.
    https://youtu.be/ojUVlHxnG-w?si=lP6R8rQ4VtMYACzb

    Replies: @anon

    Could you post a TLDR of the video?

    Does it come to the same conclusion as this insightful article?

    https://www.unz.com/article/what-race-were-the-greeks-and-romans/

    •�Replies: @BB753
    @anon

    “Russia apologist” is the polite form for "Putin fanboy". That is, any sane person who thinks starting WWIII with Russia and China is not a good idea.
    , @BB753
    @anon

    "Could you post a TLDR of the video?"

    Can't you spare 30 minutes and educate yourself?

    "Does it come to the same conclusion as this insightful article?

    https://www.unz.com/article/what-race-were-the-greeks-and-romans/"
    No, it reaches a different conclusion. Romans were white but not Nordic . BTW, that article is not insightful at all.
  207. @anon
    @Coconuts


    Romanians are interesting in having a Latin derived language
    Latin is a language originating from Dacia; ancient Dacian did not vanish mysteriously but is the common ancestor of both Latin and modern Romanian. Dacian, if you will, is Vulgar Latin, which preceded Classical Latin. A likely explanation for the fact that Dacia is also called Romania is that it—rather than Italy—was the original home of the Romans who founded Constantinople. The Roman language (Latin) remained the administrative language of the Eastern Empire until the sixth century AD, when it was abandoned for Greek, the language spoken by the majority of its subjects.

    Replies: @Odyssey

    Totally meaningless. Latin was not a spoken language and no language was born from it. It was a provincial dialect of the province of Lazio that was taken over by the Vatican much later.

    The Dacians, as part of the indigenous peoples of Europe, spoke a Serbian dialect. It was only in the 19th century that the Jesuits, after 300 years of work, invented an artificial Romanian nation with an artificial Romanian language to separate the Russians from the Mediterranean.

    Even after several campaigns of purification, the artificial Romanian (which they call Esperanto based on Serbian) still has a quarter of Serbian words. Some Serbian Dacians (e.g. Galerius) were Roman emperors who built the city of Felix Romuliana in his birthplace in eastern Serbia. Galerius, who was Diocletian’s son-in-law, issued an Edict of Tolerance of Christianity in Serdica (today Sophia), two years before Constantine.

    •�Replies: @Belis60
    @Odyssey

    "Latin was not a spoken language and no language was born from it".

    Should we laugh or what? Latin was the language of the Romans, from which Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, French and Rumanian languages are derived. English is the only Germanic language with a 65% of the vocabulary from Latin - thanks to 400 years of Roman occupation of Britain.

    Replies: @anon
  208. Off topic. The Illinois Supreme Court has overturned the conviction of Jussie Smollett for his fraudulent hate crime hoax. Another state completely controlled by the Jew black alliance of the state’s largest city.

    An alliance that destroyed one of America’s great cities. Along with all our other great cities. And America itself.

  209. @J.Ross
    @guest007

    An old black propaganda slur from an election, plus modern black credulity. The basis of the rebuttal is a conference of historians.

    Replies: @guest007

    Here is a cite that says that genetic analysis along with timeline plotting shows that there is a good chance that Jefferson father some of Hennings children.

    https://www.monticello.org/thomas-jefferson/jefferson-slavery/thomas-jefferson-and-sally-hemings-a-brief-account/

  210. @Bardon Kaldian
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    Really confusing.

    Muslims translated only some parts that were useful- Galen, Euclid & parts of Aristotle & Plotinus. They did not inherit the culture, from sculpture and aesthetics to spiritual orientation.

    The Latin west was simply richer & priests copied manuscripts that frequently run contrary to their beliefs. That's why works of Tacitus, Caesar, Virgil, Horace, Lucretius, Juvenal, Ovid, ...survive. They absorbed pseudo-Dionysius through Scotus Erigena, the most original thinker between 500 and 1000 in the world. They also developed visual arts, especially in manuscripts & later sculptures, as well as music around 900.- Hildegard of Bingen.

    Both Islam and Byzantium clearly lagged in the intellectual production from the 500 to 1300, although, especially Islam, was more technologically advanced.

    But mentally, except a few fields like parts of nascent sciences, they were limited by their dogmas and not interested in the varieties of human mental experience.

    Islamic best minds were not bold nor imaginative enough. They did have a golden age with better food & comparable architecture, perhaps better sewer system etc.- but they don't have civilizational continuity with what was Greco-Roman Antiguity, neither in letters, thought, unquenchable humanism, artistic culture and human values.

    Islam & Byzantium remained mired in mysticism and oriental despotism.

    Especially after Europe exploded after 1300. Dante, Eckhart, Hildegard and Giotto were active before anything happened to Constantinople.

    Replies: @Alden

    The Muslim alleged golden age was about 400 years after their conquest of the ancient cultures of Egypt Greece Rome Assyria Mesopotamia Persia etc and the destruction of those cultures by Islam

    It was not Muslim Arabs that copied and preserved the ancient writings. It was Christian Arab monks in their monastic libraries who did all the copying and preservation. Which they began in the late 200s AD before Rome legalized Christianity

    As the Caliph of Baghdad Haroun Al Raschid said to the the librarians of the Alexandria library when they tried to prevent him from using the books and scrolls for firewood.” There is but one book and that is the holy Koran”

  211. @mc23
    There were certainly Blacks in the ancient classical world. Cleopatra for instance is depicted with several distinctly Black handmaidens and Black gladiators are known, but while the Nubian and Kush kingdoms are interesting by themselves, they weren't the driving forces in ancient Egypt’s history.

    Our legacy media has lost the trust of half the country. Organizations like the Met Museum shouldn’t presume on public trust. They aren’t the gatekeepers they once were and at some point, a loss of confidence in the ability to carry out their mission will have disappointing consequences among those who appreciate them. And for what? Conflating East Africa, along with Berber tribesmen and Semitic colonists in North Africa with the entire continent is just a con game in the end. We can appreciate pre-conquest societies in the Americas for their own sake and we should adopt that view in Africa.

    Replies: @Odyssey, @Alden, @Alden

    Cleopatra’s black maids were slaves imported from Sudan etc. why bother discussing the anti Whute anti European people’s anti Christian civilization lies written by communists Jews and progressives Just assume it’s all lies and like the NYTimes the opposite is true.

    You know 100 years ago all the anti White scientists were convinced that White skin meant that Whites were the most primitive race closest to animals. Because animals are covered with hair and fur and their skin is pale White.

    Now the theory is that Europeans were dark brown like Africans until about 1,000 BC.

    It’s all anti White anti European peoples anti Christian lies not worth discussing. How can you believe the lie that cheddar man had any shade of dark skin during the ice age? It’s all lies

    •�Thanks: TWS
  212. @Joe Stalin
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dSg_Hrt3T2Y
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4egRsvejlc

    Replies: @Old Prude, @Old Prude

    Sorry, shooting down slow moving drones does not count as air to air combat any more than blowing up five trucks makes one an ace.

    Target practice against RC airplanes (with missiles no less!) is not anywhere near the neighborhood of being locked in deadly combat against Russian, German and Japanese pilots.

    With medal inflation, today’s military probably sees it differently.

    •�Replies: @Felpudinho
    @Old Prude


    Sorry, shooting down slow moving drones does not count as air to air combat any more than blowing up five trucks makes one an ace...

    ...With medal inflation, today’s military probably sees it differently.
    Speaking of "Medal Inflation," look at the awards decorating the chest of Ukrainian-American fatty, Alexander Vindman. Remember, this is a guy who retired early from the Military because he said he was being bullied too much.

    https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2019/10/Impeachment9-1024x762.jpg

    Replies: @Jim Don Bob, @Curle, @mulga mumblebrain, @nebulafox
  213. @Anonymous
    Hey, Denzel is cool. Let's not be racist.

    https://twitter.com/landofangle/status/1859321734320763133

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Grand Marquis de Sade, @YetAnotherAnon, @AnotherDad

    A black guy driving a stick? Let’s get serious.

  214. @Ministry Of Tongues
    @Jonathan Mason


    It is that simple.
    No, it isn't. There is a world of difference between "We want stories about us" and "All stories must be about us."

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease

    “There is a world of difference between “We want stories about us” and “All stories must be about us.””

    A good point; but really, if you want to get down to it, it’s actually more like, “All of *your* stories must now be about *us*.”

    I don’t know if Steve agrees with this, but it would be interesting to see him put his film-critic hat on and do an overview of the latest fad: the Jordan Peele-led “Black! horror movie” craze. My feeling is, none of these movies work as horror, or even *can* work (especially not “Get Out”), because culturally blacks have no horror tradition to build out from, and specifically no tradition of the Gothic or of the uncanny (hell, it’s *all* uncanny — see Amos Tutuole); and no interesting science fiction either, because no actual science in the first place. The subtext of all these movies is –you guess it– slabery, once again, as if that’s really something to be afraid of in this day and age, but what else they got?; and maybe those dopey black-specific superstitions, like being weirdly unusually afraid of snakes (is that even true, or do they just fake it because it’s an identity-reinforcement thing?).

    Horror, like comedy, works because it warps the straight line. The problem is that blacks believe so many ridiculously stupid, patently false things, that for them, there is no straight line to begin with.

    •�Replies: @Anon
    @The Germ Theory of Disease

    A trend in horror movies and also movies in general right now is pushing the strong female lead, and typically she’s mulatto or accompanied by a black man. On the rare occasion there’s male lead, he’s always accompanied by a strong woman chauffeur. It’s really getting monotonous at this point and I hope the trend goes by the wayside.

    -Rooster
    , @Ministry Of Tongues
    @The Germ Theory of Disease

    That television series, Lovecraft Country, illustrates your point.

    An Amos Tutuola film directed by Fellini would have been great, though.
  215. @mc23
    There were certainly Blacks in the ancient classical world. Cleopatra for instance is depicted with several distinctly Black handmaidens and Black gladiators are known, but while the Nubian and Kush kingdoms are interesting by themselves, they weren't the driving forces in ancient Egypt’s history.

    Our legacy media has lost the trust of half the country. Organizations like the Met Museum shouldn’t presume on public trust. They aren’t the gatekeepers they once were and at some point, a loss of confidence in the ability to carry out their mission will have disappointing consequences among those who appreciate them. And for what? Conflating East Africa, along with Berber tribesmen and Semitic colonists in North Africa with the entire continent is just a con game in the end. We can appreciate pre-conquest societies in the Americas for their own sake and we should adopt that view in Africa.

    Replies: @Odyssey, @Alden, @Alden

    The Smithsonian is the absolute worst. What can one expect of an 100 percent White hating affirmative action government museum. The gay trans White perverts are more anti White than the blacks browns and tabs. Being anti White is a prerequisite for a government job.

    •�Agree: Old Prude
  216. @anonymouseperson
    In ancient Rome Negroes were such a rare sight they would be pitted against one another in gladiator battles in the coliseum. Looks like it is not just British history that is being black washed.

    Replies: @anon

    Says who?

    This book has included over 140 illustrations which depict the Negro as the Greeks and Romans conceived of him in mythology and religion and observed him in a number of occupations-as servant, diplomat, warrior, athlete, and performer, among others.

  217. @Joe Stalin
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dSg_Hrt3T2Y
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4egRsvejlc

    Replies: @Old Prude, @Old Prude

    From a cost-benefit analysis, the Iranians won this one. They lost 300 cheap drones and missiles. The Israelis and American probably shot off twice that number of expensive munitions and missiles, and that’s not even counting the jet fuel and ancillary cost of the scramble.

  218. @Bardon Kaldian
    OT- Ukraine

    I just watched Piers Morgan for fun. This time, it was about Russian war in Ukraine. For any person with IQ higher than room temperature & maturity more than that of a spoiled child, matters are obvious just from this clip.

    The oldest guest is a retired general, a cautious man who actually didn't say anything worth remembering.

    Then, it is Jake Broe, a strong supporter of Ukraine whom I respect & may disagree only on the strategy vs tactics issues. But his heart & mind are in the right place.

    Then you got two MAGA types, Benny and Scott, who are not just infantile, but they cannot behave. They are jumpy, hysterical & ill mannered. They are certainly not Russian bots, but Jake is, and here I agree with him, rightly says that there is some "homoerotic fixation" with Putin on the Trumpist side.

    This entertainment is not something serious; you don't have nuances analyses etc. But for any mentally sane & normal person, it is obvious who is right- and who is wrong.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VPsMhYye7Uo

    Replies: @Old Prude, @J.Ross, @Mr. Anon

    Silly. Condoleeza Rice could probably make a far more articulate case for starting a war with Russia, than I could for a negotiated peace, but that doesn’t make her right.

    •�Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
    @Old Prude

    Because your moral & legal coordinates do not belong to a civilized society.

    Replies: @Old Prude
  219. @Anonymous
    This is the state of America, but Sailer is wondering when it's okay to blacken European history?
    Hey, it's okay when the celebrity is cool enough.

    No wonder his side keeps losing.

    https://twitter.com/Variety/status/1859626960835469355

    Replies: @kaganovitch

    It was overturned on a legal technicality, not on substance of charge.

    •�Replies: @Jim Don Bob
    @kaganovitch


    It was overturned on a legal technicality, not on substance of charge.
    I don't mean to be picky here, but the "legal technicality" was double jeopardy which is in the Constitution thingy.

    Jussie made a (sweetheart) deal with the prosecutor, and then another prosecutor got a conviction, which was, IMHO, rightly over turned.

    Jussie still faces federal charges, which some might argue are also double jeopardy, as Derek Chauvin, and the Georgia boys who tried to arrest the jogger found out. But then, their real crime was being white and mean towards a dindu.
    , @HA
    @kaganovitch

    "It was overturned on a legal technicality, not on substance of charge."

    It was apparently overturned because he fulfilled the (however shady) plea deal given him by Kim Foxx, so that conviction secured by the special prosecutor was too close to double jeopardy for the court's comfort:

    Kim Foxx is feeling vindicated by the Illinois State Supreme Court's decision to overturn Jussie Smollett's conviction ... saying she still believes her office made the right call by offering him a plea deal...she says she's not surprised by the court's decision.

    Foxx says she took criminal procedure during her first year of law school ... so she understands double jeopardy -- and knew immediately Jussie's conviction in 2021 would be overturned.

    Jussie fulfilled his obligations -- 15 hours of community service and a forfeiture of $10k in bail money...until she says Dan Webb, the special prosecutor, felt the public pressure and decided to try Jussie again.
  220. @Bardon Kaldian
    @Reg Cæsar

    It's basically the same in all high traditions. And spontaneous experiences.

    Under the Ming dynasty (16th century) a disciple took up his dwelling beside a master who had been meditating for thirty years in a cave. One night, when going along a mountain path, the disciple “felt a light circulating inside his body, and heard a rumbling of thunder at the top of his head”. The mountain, the stream, the world and his own self disappeared. This experience lasted “as long as it takes five pinches of incense to burn”. Afterwards he felt that he had become an entirely different man and had been purified by his own Light.

    ................
    Similar though much briefer experience is described by Warner Allen in "The Timeless Moment" (1946); it took place between two successive notes of Beethoven’s Seventh Symphony and involved no conscious hiatus in listening to the music. Here is Warner Allen’s description: “I closed my eyes and watched a silver glow which shaped itself into a circle with a central focus brighter than the rest. The circle became a tunnel of light
    proceeding from some distant sun in the heart of the Self. Swiftly and smoothly I was borne through the tunnel and, as I went the light turned from silver to gold. There was an impression of drawing strength from a limitless sea of power and a sense of deepening peace. The light grew brighter, but was never dazzling or alarming. I came to a point where time and motion ceased ...I am absorbed in the Light of the Universe, in Reality glowing like fire with the knowledge of itself, without ceasing to be one and myself, merged like a drop of quicksilver in the Whole, yet still separate as a grain of sand in the desert. The peace that passes all understanding and the pulsating energy of Creation are one in the centre . . . where all opposites are reconciled”

    Replies: @kaganovitch

    So LSD was synthesized earlier than hitherto thought?

    •�Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
    @kaganovitch

    There are tons of transcendent experiences throughout ages, within and without religions, and having nothing to do with any kind of substance.
  221. @Voltarde
    Maybe Scott's next effort as a director will be a sequel toThe Duellists. Scott could cast Denzel Washington as the elderly Feraud.

    D'Hubert and Feraud could continue their pistol duels in Vibrant America, typically missing each other but unfortunately hitting everyone else, illustrating Sailer's Law of Mass Shootings.

    The Duellists - Final Duel: Pistols in the Ruins
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynoUrmCn8Ec

    Replies: @Jim Don Bob

    +10 on The Duellists.

    I saw it when it first came out. I watched it again recently and it was as good as I remembered.

  222. @kaganovitch
    @Anonymous

    It was overturned on a legal technicality, not on substance of charge.

    Replies: @Jim Don Bob, @HA

    It was overturned on a legal technicality, not on substance of charge.

    I don’t mean to be picky here, but the “legal technicality” was double jeopardy which is in the Constitution thingy.

    Jussie made a (sweetheart) deal with the prosecutor, and then another prosecutor got a conviction, which was, IMHO, rightly over turned.

    Jussie still faces federal charges, which some might argue are also double jeopardy, as Derek Chauvin, and the Georgia boys who tried to arrest the jogger found out. But then, their real crime was being white and mean towards a dindu.

  223. @kaganovitch
    @Bardon Kaldian

    So LSD was synthesized earlier than hitherto thought?

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian

    There are tons of transcendent experiences throughout ages, within and without religions, and having nothing to do with any kind of substance.

  224. @Odyssey
    @BB753

    Visigoths, Vandals and Ostrogoths were Serbian speaking tribes, not Germanic.
    Do you know when the Germanic tribes came from Asia to Europe? There are many historical forgeries, such as that the ancestors of today's Germans were Aryans and Goths. Today's Germans got this name from the natives of today's Germany, and I have already established that not a single German at unz knows the meaning of their name.

    Replies: @Mike Tre, @Tiptoethrutulips

    For those that don’t know, Odyssey here believes the entirety of humanity is descended from a single Serbian vagina back in the days of the Garden of Eden (according to Ody, Eden translates to Serbia in Serbian).

    I suggest skimming through his comment history, especially the replies he gets. Worth a few laughs.

    •�LOL: Old Prude
    •�Replies: @Odyssey
    @Mike Tre

    Find one mistake in my comments and you get a free case of wine worldwide delivered.
    So far, no one has found a material error in my comments. Above you have a question - who were Emperor Justinian, his uncle Emperor Justin and his general Belisarius?
    If you answer, you get another box of wine as a bonus. I bet you won't have the courage to answer.

    Replies: @anon
    , @Dmon
    @Mike Tre

    You sound like a typical Panzer mind.
  225. @Odyssey
    @BB753

    Visigoths, Vandals and Ostrogoths were Serbian speaking tribes, not Germanic.
    Do you know when the Germanic tribes came from Asia to Europe? There are many historical forgeries, such as that the ancestors of today's Germans were Aryans and Goths. Today's Germans got this name from the natives of today's Germany, and I have already established that not a single German at unz knows the meaning of their name.

    Replies: @Mike Tre, @Tiptoethrutulips

    Do you know when the Germanic tribes came from Asia to Europe?

    When did those non-Germanic, yet Slavic Russians evolve from those very same Asiatic Steppes?

    Whence came the Celts?

    and I have already established that not a single German at unz knows the meaning of their name.

    You have established that you are ridiculous and that you tend to scurry off when challenged.

    German = Serbian: nemački; Russian: немeцкий; Czech: německy

    Russian немой [nemoy] means “mute / one who can’t speak…” or “stupid/dumb.”

    So what? Name a monument(s) in Turkish Serbia that rivals those built by the “stupid” Germanics of Deutschland.

    I want the translations of those Vincan scripts, Odysseus….

    •�Thanks: Mike Tre
  226. @Anon
    OT: I've been thinking about the difference between Democrats and Republicans. To piss of democrats, you have to make a steak out of one of their sacred cows. You have to say something negative about gays, women, blacks, or transgender prostitutes. To piss off Republicans, all you have to do is quote their leaders, in context. That's all it takes to puncture their fantasies. Here's Pete Hegseth:

    Simply put: if you don’t understand why Israel matters and why it is so central to the story of Western civilization—with America being its greatest manifestation—then you don’t live in history. America’s story is inextricably linked to Judeo-Christian history and the modern state of Israel. You can love America without loving Israel but that tells me your knowledge of the Bible and Western civilization is woefully incomplete
    Or here's Dr. Oz supporting transing of very young children:

    https://twitter.com/ShadowofEzra/status/1858995616161890670

    The psychology is this:

    1. I want X and I think Trump will give it to me.
    2. He won't give you X.
    3. Ok, I won't get X. But I'm pissed off at you, libtard, for taking my fantasy away from me, and I will support Trump just to piss you off. I'm going to redouble my Trump support now.

    Replies: @William Badwhite, @Wokechoke

    Looks like John “John Johnson” Johnson forgot his handle

    •�Replies: @Corpse Tooth
    @William Badwhite

    That's one too many Johnsons.
    , @Reg Cæsar
    @William Badwhite


    Looks like John “John Johnson” Johnson forgot his handle

    It's in the safety deposit box along with his hero Tim Walz's Medal of Honor.

    Which reminds me-- The Wall Street Journal's cable channel's weekly "Hits & Misses" series posted a special campaign-themed episode Nov. 5th. One of the panelists, Kimberley Strassel, chose the selection of J.D. Vance as the worst "miss" of either campaign, which was Johnson's take as well. (Not implying that Kim might be Johnson. Can't imagine her saying anything good about Walz.)

    Kyle Peterson retorted that the Harris campaign's choice was the worst blunder on either side. However, he framed this entirely as in her not picking Shapiro. He said nothing about the ultimate pick, Johnson's favorite.

    The New York Times assembled a longitudinal focus group of young undecideds months ago, and followed up at times during the campaign. They decided in the last week, and Trump took most of them. And a common factor in their decision was J.D. Vance, who gave some heft to the ticket.

    So whether or not you'd take campaign advice from Kim Strassel, do not under any circumstances take it from John Johnson.

    Replies: @AnotherDad
  227. OT — They’ve already changed it, but MSNBC published an article titled “Laken Riley’s killer never had a chance.”

  228. @Bardon Kaldian
    OT- Ukraine

    I just watched Piers Morgan for fun. This time, it was about Russian war in Ukraine. For any person with IQ higher than room temperature & maturity more than that of a spoiled child, matters are obvious just from this clip.

    The oldest guest is a retired general, a cautious man who actually didn't say anything worth remembering.

    Then, it is Jake Broe, a strong supporter of Ukraine whom I respect & may disagree only on the strategy vs tactics issues. But his heart & mind are in the right place.

    Then you got two MAGA types, Benny and Scott, who are not just infantile, but they cannot behave. They are jumpy, hysterical & ill mannered. They are certainly not Russian bots, but Jake is, and here I agree with him, rightly says that there is some "homoerotic fixation" with Putin on the Trumpist side.

    This entertainment is not something serious; you don't have nuances analyses etc. But for any mentally sane & normal person, it is obvious who is right- and who is wrong.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VPsMhYye7Uo

    Replies: @Old Prude, @J.Ross, @Mr. Anon

    So the sloppy mass murderer Elensky had a pop song written and dedicated to him, and was praised in every regime cheap editorial and political cartoon that nobody reads, but recognizing Putin was a real leader is homosexual? Dude, your side wrote him a song. You shouldn’t be throwing that particular stone.

    •�Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
    @J.Ross

    I wrote "mentally sane & normal person".

    Replies: @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality
  229. @Reg Cæsar
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms


    For most of Early Middle Ages Europe was illiterate.
    No, it wasn't. There were monks, scribes, clerks, even scholars. Alcuin didn't reinvent the alphabet.

    You are carrying on the "dark ages" fallacy. Next you'll be telling us Columbus "discovered" the roundness of the world.

    Replies: @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    While it is impossible to calculate literacy rates in pre-modern Islamic societies, it is almost certain that they were relatively high, at least in comparison to their European counterparts.[49]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_Golden_Age

    The question of Charlemagne’s literacy is debated, with little direct evidence from contemporary sources.

    Historian Johannes Fried considers it likely that Charlemagne would have been able to read,[47] but the medievalist Paul Dutton writes that “the evidence for his ability to read is circumstantial and inferential at best”[48] and concludes that it is likely that he never properly mastered the skill.[49] Einhard makes no direct mention of Charlemagne reading, and recorded that he only attempted to learn to write later in life.[50]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlemagne#Early_life_and_rise_to_power

    Byzantium’s great intellectual achievement was the Corpus Juris Civilis (“Body of Civil Law”), a massive compilation of Roman law made under Justinian (r. 528–65). The work includes a section called the Digesta which abstracts the principles of Roman law in such a way that they can be applied to any situation.

    The level of literacy was considerably higher in the Byzantine Empire than in the Latin West.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_Middle_Ages

    •�Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms


    While it is impossible to calculate literacy rates in pre-modern Islamic societies, it is almost certain that they were relatively high, at least in comparison to their European counterparts.
    For both sexes? Did any population have close to a majority literate before the 20th century? Generally just boys of a certain class were taught. And those in business, for record-keeping.

    The level of literacy was considerably higher in the Byzantine Empire than in the Latin West.

    No one denies this. (Though where are the data for comparison? Proto-PISA tests?)

    But your claim that no one in the West could read or write is beyond bizarre. Civilization carried on, just without the fanfare of giant, boastful cities. The Bedes were busy scribbling all along.

    The question of Charlemagne’s literacy is debated...
    The question of Mohammed's is not-- he wasn't. This is even held up as evidence for the faith.

    And he started as a businessman, to boot. Who was keeping his tallies? The man at the top doesn't have to be literate himself, he just has to tell those who are what to do. Bill Clinton is said to have sent all of two e-mails in his eight years at 1600. That was a job for staff.

    Replies: @muggles, @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
  230. @kaganovitch
    @Anonymous

    It was overturned on a legal technicality, not on substance of charge.

    Replies: @Jim Don Bob, @HA

    “It was overturned on a legal technicality, not on substance of charge.”

    It was apparently overturned because he fulfilled the (however shady) plea deal given him by Kim Foxx, so that conviction secured by the special prosecutor was too close to double jeopardy for the court’s comfort:

    Kim Foxx is feeling vindicated by the Illinois State Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Jussie Smollett’s conviction … saying she still believes her office made the right call by offering him a plea deal…she says she’s not surprised by the court’s decision.

    Foxx says she took criminal procedure during her first year of law school … so she understands double jeopardy — and knew immediately Jussie’s conviction in 2021 would be overturned.

    Jussie fulfilled his obligations — 15 hours of community service and a forfeiture of $10k in bail money…until she says Dan Webb, the special prosecutor, felt the public pressure and decided to try Jussie again.

  231. @Reg Cæsar
    @Jonathan Mason


    Certainly a lot more credible than Yahweh or Allah.
    Yahweh, God, and Allah are just different names in various languages for the same thing. Excuse me, Thing.


    They may have widely-- even wildly-- differing views of the nature and desires of this Person. One Catholic priest even referred to "the alien god of Calvinism". But one can carry this too far.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian, @Bill Jones

    Yahweh, God, and Allah are just different names in various languages for the same thing. Excuse me, Thing.

    You are, of course, wrong.
    God is a generic term, Allah is a definitive term “There is no God but Allah” and Yahweh was a tribal Totem.

  232. @Reg Cæsar
    @Twinkie

    At a Russian immersion class taught by (mostly) natives I attended back in the late Soviet era, a fellow student said he'd overheard a couple of the teachers referring to "Saint Petersburg". Another replied that that was nothing; he had heard them talking of Constantinople.


    https://youtu.be/Wcze7EGorOk?si=0y2MjGoGsge54px9


    Lyrics by an Ulsterman, no less. Saint Petersburg would be back within seven years; Constantinople didn't change until the lifetimes of the older teachers, so it wasn't as radical (or reactionary) as we thought.

    Replies: @Isabel Archer

    Thanks, Reg. It’s a great song.

  233. Gladiators would have come from all over the Empire and beyond so plausibly there would have been black African gladiators but probably not many. It was cheaper to procure slaves from inside the Empire or its periphery rather than transporting them across the Sahara or down the Nile. Most slaves who were pressed into serving as gladiators or the free men who voluntarily signed up for it, would have been from around the Mediterranean.
    Also as a side note, the Emperor Severius who succeeded Commodus from the first movie is sometimes claimed to be black, but although he was born in North Africa he was not black. His son who in turn succeeded him has a curious sort of Hollywood connection. He affected walking around in an ominous looking hooded cloak which came to be named after him; the Caracalla. You see it in Star Wars worn by another emperor; Palpatine.

  234. @Jack D
    From the Dept. of Unintentionally Hilarious Headlines:


    Disillusioned by the Election, Some Black Women Are Deciding to Rest
    https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/19/well/black-women-harris-trump-election-rest.html

    I can only imagine the enormous struggle these black women must have gone thru in order to abate their natural inclination toward vigorous hard work.

    Replies: @Mark G., @Isabel Archer, @Colin Wright

    Unfortunately this NYT story linked to is behind a paywall.

  235. @obwandiyag
    @Bardon Kaldian

    The English are crazy for it. Dickens. Austen. etc

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian, @Lurker

    The people who hold media power are crazy for it. The British themselves are not crazy for it.

    •�Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @Lurker

    "The people who hold media power are crazy for it. The British themselves are not crazy for it."

    Which is precisely *why* the (((people))) who hold (((media power))) are crazy for it to begin with.
  236. @Lurker
    @obwandiyag

    The people who hold media power are crazy for it. The British themselves are not crazy for it.

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease

    “The people who hold media power are crazy for it. The British themselves are not crazy for it.”

    Which is precisely *why* the (((people))) who hold (((media power))) are crazy for it to begin with.

    •�Agree: Lurker
  237. @prosa123
    Matt Gaetz has withdrawn his nomination.

    Replies: @Bill Jones, @Bardon Kaldian, @Jonathan Mason, @Corpse Tooth

    Was it his uncanny resemblance to Butt-Head?

  238. @William Badwhite
    @Anon

    Looks like John "John Johnson" Johnson forgot his handle

    Replies: @Corpse Tooth, @Reg Cæsar

    That’s one too many Johnsons.

  239. @Odyssey
    @Dmon

    Emperor Justinian and his general Belisarius were Serbs.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Dmon

    Do you mean they were born in what is now Serbia, or do you mean they were ethnic Serbs? Belisarius was (according to wikipedia) probably born in what is now Bulgaria. The Byzantine emperors had a fractious relationship with actual Bulgarians, but the later Imperial army (particularly from the 11th century on) generally employed a number of Bulgarian mercenaries. It is a little known fact that Tom Lehrer’s “It Makes a Fellow Proud to be a Soldier” was not an original composition, but was actually based on a fragment of an old Byzantine army marching song:

    “Now Nicephorous Phocas is the boss of all us jerks.
    He doesn’t really like it when we lose against the Turks.
    So we give ’em the Greek Fire. It’s not sporting – but it works.
    It makes a fellow proud to be a Buuull-gar.”

    I’m willing to entertain the idea that Belisarius was Hungarian though.

    Belisarius:

    Al Hrabosky:

    •�Replies: @Odyssey
    @Dmon

    You're trying to make a joke but you're not succeeding. At the time Belisarius was born, the Asian Bulgars had not yet come to Europe. The indigenous Serbs lived in present-day Bulgaria. Later, the Bulgarians came to present-day Moldova with the permission of the Serbian ruler. They settled there, but after a few decades they crossed the Danube and came to present-day Bulgaria. There were few of them, so they got assimilated, adopted the Serbian language and Christianity.

    Almost all modern Bulgarians are ethnic i.e. genetic Serbs and only a small percentage are descendants of the Asian Bulgars, but their name has remained. As for the Hungarians, they came from Asia even later, in 896 AC, i.e. several hundred years after Belisarius and Justinian. In present-day Hungary, there were also indigenous Serbs. So that joke didn't work for you either.

    Justinian built the city of Justiniana Prima in his native remote village in Serbia. His uncle, Emperor Justin, was born in a neighbouring village.

    Computer animation of Justinian Prima, the center of the province of Illyricum (5 min):

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhG_Ry3D8bU

    Replies: @Dmon
  240. @Tex
    @The Germ Theory of Disease

    I like the occasional sword & sandal movie. So one night Mrs. Tex and me are watching some Hercules film where the strong man gets enslaved and put to work building a road. Sinister baddies want to make him a gladiator though. So we get several scenes where the slave boss is complaining that the road building will be behind schedule if they don't have Hercules. I tuned in for a peplum and got a lecture on project management!

    Replies: @muggles

    So we get several scenes where the slave boss is complaining that the road building will be behind schedule if they don’t have Hercules. I tuned in for a peplum and got a lecture on project management!

    I thought about this comment later. Very funny…

    •�Agree: Old Prude
  241. @Trinity
    @Thomm

    This is AT LEAST the second time you posted this 🐊 story.
    Yes, thank you for telling all of us that the Nile crocodiles are larger than American alligators. Damn, we had no idea 🥴. Lol. I have heard of some gators about 14 feet, no idea of weight, still significantly smaller than large crocodiles but would be about average for a average crocodile.

    Okay, Jim Fowler, R.I.P ( my GP was related to Jungle Jim) let’s have an Animal Face-Off

    Hippo vs. Rhino ?
    Who wins?

    Replies: @Isabel Archer

    The gators in these videos from Florida and South Carolina look pretty big to me. Usually they are seen crossing golf courses. One in Fripp Island, SC was nicknamed Sherman the Tank:

    •�Replies: @Trinity
    @Isabel Archer

    I know that a 14 footer killed a guy in Lakeland, Florida in 2005-2006. There was a 1,043 lb alligator caught in Gainesville, Florida. An alligator named Stokes in Alabama was a 15 footer. Salt water crocodiles can get as large as 20 feet or more and weigh over a ton, however in some cases. Those huge alligators have probably been around for awhile as well. Thanks for those videos. Awesome sight. Louisiana and Florida also have some awesome specimens of alligator snapping turtles but the largest caught on record was a 211 pounder in Texas.
  242. @prosa123
    In opera, for instance, singing ability is far more important than visual authenticity

    Like when the part of a fragile waif dying of consumption is sung by a 200-lb. soprano.

    Replies: @Almost Missouri, @Bill Jones

    Like when the part of a fragile waif dying of consumption is sung by a 200-lb. soprano.

    It’s all relative:
    A Black Diva only weighing in at 200 could well be dying of consumption.

    •�LOL: Old Prude
  243. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    @Reg Cæsar


    While it is impossible to calculate literacy rates in pre-modern Islamic societies, it is almost certain that they were relatively high, at least in comparison to their European counterparts.[49]
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_Golden_Age

    The question of Charlemagne's literacy is debated, with little direct evidence from contemporary sources.

    Historian Johannes Fried considers it likely that Charlemagne would have been able to read,[47] but the medievalist Paul Dutton writes that "the evidence for his ability to read is circumstantial and inferential at best"[48] and concludes that it is likely that he never properly mastered the skill.[49] Einhard makes no direct mention of Charlemagne reading, and recorded that he only attempted to learn to write later in life.[50]
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlemagne#Early_life_and_rise_to_power

    Byzantium's great intellectual achievement was the Corpus Juris Civilis ("Body of Civil Law"), a massive compilation of Roman law made under Justinian (r. 528–65). The work includes a section called the Digesta which abstracts the principles of Roman law in such a way that they can be applied to any situation.

    The level of literacy was considerably higher in the Byzantine Empire than in the Latin West.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_Middle_Ages

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    While it is impossible to calculate literacy rates in pre-modern Islamic societies, it is almost certain that they were relatively high, at least in comparison to their European counterparts.

    For both sexes? Did any population have close to a majority literate before the 20th century? Generally just boys of a certain class were taught. And those in business, for record-keeping.

    The level of literacy was considerably higher in the Byzantine Empire than in the Latin West.

    No one denies this. (Though where are the data for comparison? Proto-PISA tests?)

    But your claim that no one in the West could read or write is beyond bizarre. Civilization carried on, just without the fanfare of giant, boastful cities. The Bedes were busy scribbling all along.

    The question of Charlemagne’s literacy is debated…

    The question of Mohammed’s is not– he wasn’t. This is even held up as evidence for the faith.

    And he started as a businessman, to boot. Who was keeping his tallies? The man at the top doesn’t have to be literate himself, he just has to tell those who are what to do. Bill Clinton is said to have sent all of two e-mails in his eight years at 1600. That was a job for staff.

    •�Replies: @muggles
    @Reg Cæsar


    The question of Mohammed’s is not– he wasn’t. This is even held up as evidence for the faith.
    Likewise, there is no claim that Jesus was literate that I'm aware of. His disciples did the writing, a common thing for major prophets. He was a carpenter by trade.

    Not sure about Moses. He did provide stone tablets, which I suppose he could read. So, God knows Hebrew anyway.

    It is my impression that Buddha spoke to disciples who then reported his words. Not entirely certain if he was literate. I think he was upper class/caste so maybe he was literate.

    Jos. Smith (Mormon) was literate as was L. Ron Hubbard. Very recent.

    Of course, the farther back in time you go, the fewer the literate population.

    Even actual artifact documents by the literate prophet adjacent disciples are few and far between, when they exist at all. Most seem to have gone through a few hands before existing documents can be found today.

    The Chinese seem to have better ancient literate texts, though I don't know if any are claimed to be originally from major religious prophets.

    Replies: @epebble, @Reg Cæsar, @J.Ross, @Wokechoke, @Curle
    , @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    @Reg Cæsar

    Charlemagne should be compared with the founding Abbasid Caliph-- al-Manṣūr (714 to 775), who undertook this effort:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graeco-Arabic_translation_movement

    Though where are the data for comparison?
    The Muslims had papermaking for three centuries earlier, and transmitted it to Europe.

    Early Middle Ages was 5 to 10th CE, how much venacular literature did the West produce in this period? Much less in Latin and Greek. Beowulf is dated to 975.

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/24/European_Output_of_Manuscripts_500%E2%80%931500.png

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval_literature

    You missed this gem?

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/2c/My_Life_Bill_Clinton.jpg

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @songbird
  244. @Anonymous
    Hey, Denzel is cool. Let's not be racist.

    https://twitter.com/landofangle/status/1859321734320763133

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Grand Marquis de Sade, @YetAnotherAnon, @AnotherDad

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/nov/22/jaguar-new-branding-cars-donald-trump

    “Hats off to Jaguar’s ‘inclusive’ new branding: now people of all backgrounds won’t buy its cars”

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2024/11/22/jaguar-boss-says-criticism-advert-hatred-intolerance/

    “Jaguar boss says criticism of new advert is ‘vile hatred and intolerance’”

  245. @Wokechoke
    @Mr. Anon

    Macrinus briefly suceeeded Caracalla. A half Roman half Arab emperor.

    Replies: @Rohirrimborn

    Macrinus was from North Africa long before the arrival of Arabs to that area. He was from a Berber family.

  246. @William Badwhite
    @Anon

    Looks like John "John Johnson" Johnson forgot his handle

    Replies: @Corpse Tooth, @Reg Cæsar

    Looks like John “John Johnson” Johnson forgot his handle

    It’s in the safety deposit box along with his hero Tim Walz’s Medal of Honor.

    Which reminds me– The Wall Street Journal’s cable channel’s weekly “Hits & Misses” series posted a special campaign-themed episode Nov. 5th. One of the panelists, Kimberley Strassel, chose the selection of J.D. Vance as the worst “miss” of either campaign, which was Johnson’s take as well. (Not implying that Kim might be Johnson. Can’t imagine her saying anything good about Walz.)

    Kyle Peterson retorted that the Harris campaign’s choice was the worst blunder on either side. However, he framed this entirely as in her not picking Shapiro. He said nothing about the ultimate pick, Johnson’s favorite.

    The New York Times assembled a longitudinal focus group of young undecideds months ago, and followed up at times during the campaign. They decided in the last week, and Trump took most of them. And a common factor in their decision was J.D. Vance, who gave some heft to the ticket.

    So whether or not you’d take campaign advice from Kim Strassel, do not under any circumstances take it from John Johnson.

    •�Replies: @AnotherDad
    @Reg Cæsar


    The New York Times assembled a longitudinal focus group of young undecideds months ago, and followed up at times during the campaign. They decided in the last week, and Trump took most of them. And a common factor in their decision was J.D. Vance, who gave some heft to the ticket.
    Not just Johnson but a handful of other commenters were tossing out anti-Vance dumbshittery as well.

    I fully realize I'm not normative for the American population. Vance is a bit young. But I really like having leaders who are smart and highly articulate, who can explain ideas, problems and solutions clearly. Not Trump's strong suit--and an even more stingy contrast to vapid Kamala and doofus Walz.

    Vance is a core American midwesterner from a working class--disordered working class--background. And guess what, Trump/Vance absolutely bolts down Ohio--a previously Republican leaning swinger, and sweeps all the plausibile Midwest industrial swingers, on the way to victory. Maybe it isn't just me? Maybe other Americans also like having politicians who are intelligent and can string together coherent sentences?

    Replies: @Mark G., @Reg Cæsar, @Mr. Anon, @Manfred Arcane
  247. OT — When You’re America’s Friend — A German anon said:

    Bosch
    They gonna fire at least 3800 people in Germany.

    https://www.zdf.de/nachrichten/wirtschaft/bosch-stellen-abbau-deutschland-100.html

    •�Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
    @J.Ross

    The German economy is deep in the doo-doo, but then so is the entire European "green" economy. China are eating their lunch.

    "Northvolt CEO resigns as Europe’s big hope for a battery champion files for bankruptcy"

    https://www.cnbc.com/2024/11/22/northvolt-files-for-bankruptcy-in-setback-to-europes-ev-ambitions.html

    "Britishvolt: how Britain’s bright battery future fell flat"

    https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/jan/20/britishvolt-britains-battery-startup-uk-car-production
  248. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    @Coconuts


    after a certain point in time, Western Europe became de facto the main carrier of the Latin Roman heritage.
    Maybe. But what is that "point in time"? For most of Early Middle Ages Europe was illiterate.

    Charlemagne's empire was not sound or durable was it? It fragmented among his heirs and lapsed into feudalism.

    Whereas Eastern Empire maintained institutional continuity and undertook revivals under Justinian and Irene.

    A large part of the population spoke languages derived from vulgar Latin
    Why does that matter? Vulgar Latin failed to maintain the ancient Indo-European case system. Such that someone like Heidegger claimed that philosophy can only be done in Greek and German.

    We can compare that with the surviving Latin cultural legacy in North Africa and the Middle East, after the Arabs arrived with Islam
    The ancient classics were in Greek. But for many centuries Germans were not interested in learning were they? Thus that there were very few Greek texts in Europe until the Renaissance.

    Learning was carried on by Muslims who translated from Greek to Arabic, such that later Europeans had to learn Arabic to read both the original works and the Muslim commentaries.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmission_of_the_Greek_Classics

    Thus the Islamic world was the de facto the main carrier of classical learning, from 8th to 13th CE, wasn't it? Until Mongols sacked Baghdad.

    they have pratically gone by now from the Middle East and North Africa,
    The Byzantine scholars brought along their Greek texts, to the West where it largely didn't exist due to destruction by Germanic barbarians.

    But what if Constantinople hadn't been sacked, would the Renaissance even have taken place?

    Constantinople and Baghdad were both sacked by the most formidable warriors in premodern era-- Eurasian nomads. Europe is in the corner of Eurasia and happens to be insulated.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian, @Reg Cæsar, @Coconuts

    But what is that “point in time”?

    Why is this important?

    You seemed to be challenging the idea that contemporary white Europeans should claim the Roman heritage solely for themselves, but who at the moment is challenging them for it? Is it part of the collective imagination of any other group that is interested in laying claim to it and carrying it forward?

    I was offering an explanation of why I thought white Europeans tend think like this about it, more than trying to justify this fact. Is there some authority people should look to to determine what is legitimate use of historical memory and cultural heritage?

    As I said in my post I suspect a lot of it is related to religion. This is the reason white Europeans from a Christian background still retain it as a significant cultural and political reference point, at the same time the fact that the Middle East has mostly adopted Islam will be an important explanation for why it doesn’t figure as the same reference point in their collective imagination. And the decline of Greek and Latin in the Middle East in favour of Arabic and Turkish.

    Language will be another part of the explanation for the greater identification with Rome’s heritage in Europe, because people want to understand (or are taught) the origin and history of their language and they find it in Rome and Greece. That will lead on to people in various parts of Europe realising that they are also likely to be descendants of one time inhabitants of the Roman Empire.

    •�Replies: @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    @Coconuts


    You seemed to be challenging the idea that contemporary white Europeans should claim the Roman heritage solely for themselves
    The problem is claiming Greco-Roman as “white” and “European”, which is both false and anachronistic.

    Greece and Rome are offshoots of ancient civilisations of eastern Mediterranean, not northern Europe.

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/35/Culture_of_Antiquity.png

    That will lead on to people in various parts of Europe realising that they are also likely to be descendants of one time inhabitants of the Roman Empire.
    Culturally yes.

    Genetically, descendants of Herman, by definition, cannot be descendants of Romans. Neither are descendants of Britons who revolted against the Romans:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boudica

    Descendants of Vercingétorix can be said to genetic descendants of Roman subjects. But so are many people of MENA background in Europe.

    As I said in my post I suspect a lot of it is related to religion.
    Sure. But legendary heroes during 19th CE Romantic nationalism period were pagan. Wagner didn’t compose operas about Constantine’s conversion.

    And who is the intellectual hero for RWers? Nietzsche, what did he say about Christianity's impact on Rome? That it was a slave morality that corrupted it.

    What is the country that actually preserves the authentic version of Christianity that Romans converted to? Russia-- whether it is part of Europe is debatable.

    The version of Christianity observed in the NW Europe, specifically became of as a criticism and reform toward Roman Catholicism, from Luther to the Puritans.

    Precisely because NW Euros were since the beginning, on the margins of the Roman world.

    Replies: @Odyssey, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @nebulafox
  249. @Reg Cæsar
    @William Badwhite


    Looks like John “John Johnson” Johnson forgot his handle

    It's in the safety deposit box along with his hero Tim Walz's Medal of Honor.

    Which reminds me-- The Wall Street Journal's cable channel's weekly "Hits & Misses" series posted a special campaign-themed episode Nov. 5th. One of the panelists, Kimberley Strassel, chose the selection of J.D. Vance as the worst "miss" of either campaign, which was Johnson's take as well. (Not implying that Kim might be Johnson. Can't imagine her saying anything good about Walz.)

    Kyle Peterson retorted that the Harris campaign's choice was the worst blunder on either side. However, he framed this entirely as in her not picking Shapiro. He said nothing about the ultimate pick, Johnson's favorite.

    The New York Times assembled a longitudinal focus group of young undecideds months ago, and followed up at times during the campaign. They decided in the last week, and Trump took most of them. And a common factor in their decision was J.D. Vance, who gave some heft to the ticket.

    So whether or not you'd take campaign advice from Kim Strassel, do not under any circumstances take it from John Johnson.

    Replies: @AnotherDad

    The New York Times assembled a longitudinal focus group of young undecideds months ago, and followed up at times during the campaign. They decided in the last week, and Trump took most of them. And a common factor in their decision was J.D. Vance, who gave some heft to the ticket.

    Not just Johnson but a handful of other commenters were tossing out anti-Vance dumbshittery as well.

    I fully realize I’m not normative for the American population. Vance is a bit young. But I really like having leaders who are smart and highly articulate, who can explain ideas, problems and solutions clearly. Not Trump’s strong suit–and an even more stingy contrast to vapid Kamala and doofus Walz.

    Vance is a core American midwesterner from a working class–disordered working class–background. And guess what, Trump/Vance absolutely bolts down Ohio–a previously Republican leaning swinger, and sweeps all the plausibile Midwest industrial swingers, on the way to victory. Maybe it isn’t just me? Maybe other Americans also like having politicians who are intelligent and can string together coherent sentences?

    •�Thanks: Curle, TWS
    •�Replies: @Mark G.
    @AnotherDad

    "Vance is a core American Midwesterner"

    The Trump/Vance ticket turned the Republican party into a working class oriented anti-elite party. The elites tend to be concentrated in the coastal areas. The last sixty years have been very good for the elites but not anyone else. Here in Indiana, the average life expectancy was 70.5 in 1960. This was higher than the national average and Indiana ranked 18th among states in the nation. As of 2020, Indiana ranks 40th in the nation and our average life expectancy is 1.9 years below the rest of the country.

    The major factor in the decline is the hollowing out of the industrial base. Added to this recently is an influx of unwanted immigrants. The Springfield, Ohio Haitian story is happening on a smaller scale around the Midwest. All this has helped lead to what Angus Deaton calls "deaths of despair" involving increasing levels of alcoholism, drug abuse and a generally unhealthy lifestyle among working class people. I have been watching it unfold up close. As a 68 year old, I can see the difference between now and the early sixties. The working class has begun a rebellion against the people who have been running this country for their own selfish benefit.

    Replies: @Mr. Anon
    , @Reg Cæsar
    @AnotherDad


    Vance is a core American midwesterner from a working class–disordered working class–background.
    Trump and Vance share a valuable skill: both can speak to those outside their own class. Way outside.

    Vance is kind of like a Clinton with morals.
    , @Mr. Anon
    @AnotherDad

    As you note, Vance is articulate - which Trump is not. Vance is also smart - which Trump is not. At least he seldom gives much evidence for it.

    But Vance may very well also be a rather slippery character. Vance owes his business and political career to the patronage of the gay German billionaire, Peter Thiel. You want to talk minoritarianism - that's three minority groups right there. As billionaire oligarchs go, Thiel is probably not the worst. But he is a billionaire oligarch and I don't trust him, nor do I necessarily trust one of his creations.

    We'll see what they do.

    One thing the incoming Trump administration should do is start doing something tangible for the people who put them in office. Back in 2017, Steve Bannon wanted to enact a large-scale federal infrastructure project that would put money into the hands of blue collar workers, especially in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. Presumably in some reliably Red states as well. That was scotched by Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell and the rest of the Republican establishment (way to go, guys).

    There are a lot of things that need fixing in America. The Trump administration should try to fix some of them. If they don't, then Vance or whoever runs to succeed Trump in 2028 will have nobody but themselves to blame.

    Replies: @AnotherDad, @Truth, @Curle
    , @Manfred Arcane
    @AnotherDad

    Vance, interestingly, triggers both the Establishment "conservatives" like John Johnson and the dissident right conspiracy obsessives, like Vox Day and The Conservative Treehouse's Sundance. America's favorite Psycho Ex-Girlfriend, Ann Coulter, also switched from praising him to excorciating him after Catlady-Gate, although she may be back to praising him by now (the lady is a bit unstable). And, of course, the left loathes him for even daring to suggest that old America is worth preserving. For a guy who has so many vocal enemies, he seems remarkably unflappable, and able to keep things from getting under his skin, unlike Trump. Also, while he lacks Trump's towering charisma, he shares his ability to connect effortlessly with normal people, something even good politicians have trouble with; much as I admire DeSantis, he came off as stiff and grumpy in campaign speeches, while Vance has a natural ease. I think Trump has done well in picking a successor.

    Replies: @Joe Stalin
  250. BTW, I assume some other folks here have seen that poll on Democrat voter preferences for 2028.

    Kamala Harris was the top choice. And not just “first among equals” but the overwhelming choice of 41% with the rest in single digits.

    Harris — 41
    Newsome — 8
    Shapiro — 7
    Butty — 6 (LOL)
    Walz — 6 (LOL who are these people?)
    AOC — 4 (at least has something going for her up front)

    I realize that Harris will not be the nominee, and that this 41% has got to be mostly a psychological loyal oath–“I was right to vote for her”. Still, one would hope that there was general awareness that their candidate was terrible–both empty and unpleasant. More and more the Democrats look not like an old style political party, but adherents of this bizarre minoritarian religion. A psychosis.

    •�Replies: @epebble
    @AnotherDad

    On the other hand, if we have a 2008 like financial event or 2020 like biological event, she is a shoo in, like Obama or Biden?
  251. @Mike Tre
    @Rohirrimborn

    Not to quibble but they were speaking "Syrian"? I thought Syrians spoke Arabic.

    Replies: @Odyssey

    So, lohohohol, who were Emperor Justinian, his uncle Emperor Justin and his general Belisarius?

    •�Replies: @Mike Tre
    @Odyssey

    https://youtu.be/VL9whwwTK6I?si=_ETDD7RR0sInlTDE
  252. 2 posts in the last week, this is really a hoppin’ place.

  253. @AnotherDad
    @Reg Cæsar


    The New York Times assembled a longitudinal focus group of young undecideds months ago, and followed up at times during the campaign. They decided in the last week, and Trump took most of them. And a common factor in their decision was J.D. Vance, who gave some heft to the ticket.
    Not just Johnson but a handful of other commenters were tossing out anti-Vance dumbshittery as well.

    I fully realize I'm not normative for the American population. Vance is a bit young. But I really like having leaders who are smart and highly articulate, who can explain ideas, problems and solutions clearly. Not Trump's strong suit--and an even more stingy contrast to vapid Kamala and doofus Walz.

    Vance is a core American midwesterner from a working class--disordered working class--background. And guess what, Trump/Vance absolutely bolts down Ohio--a previously Republican leaning swinger, and sweeps all the plausibile Midwest industrial swingers, on the way to victory. Maybe it isn't just me? Maybe other Americans also like having politicians who are intelligent and can string together coherent sentences?

    Replies: @Mark G., @Reg Cæsar, @Mr. Anon, @Manfred Arcane

    “Vance is a core American Midwesterner”

    The Trump/Vance ticket turned the Republican party into a working class oriented anti-elite party. The elites tend to be concentrated in the coastal areas. The last sixty years have been very good for the elites but not anyone else. Here in Indiana, the average life expectancy was 70.5 in 1960. This was higher than the national average and Indiana ranked 18th among states in the nation. As of 2020, Indiana ranks 40th in the nation and our average life expectancy is 1.9 years below the rest of the country.

    The major factor in the decline is the hollowing out of the industrial base. Added to this recently is an influx of unwanted immigrants. The Springfield, Ohio Haitian story is happening on a smaller scale around the Midwest. All this has helped lead to what Angus Deaton calls “deaths of despair” involving increasing levels of alcoholism, drug abuse and a generally unhealthy lifestyle among working class people. I have been watching it unfold up close. As a 68 year old, I can see the difference between now and the early sixties. The working class has begun a rebellion against the people who have been running this country for their own selfish benefit.

    •�Replies: @Mr. Anon
    @Mark G.


    All this has helped lead to what Angus Deaton calls “deaths of despair” involving increasing levels of alcoholism, drug abuse and a generally unhealthy lifestyle among working class people.
    One of the worst things that the left did to this country - to all western countries - was to attack and undermine traditional Christianity. The loss or weakening of religious faith has had a deleterious effect on people's lives, especially on the lives of the lower classes.

    Replies: @Curle
  254. The death of Peanut the Squirrel may trigger gun charges against his owner.

    It’s time once again to discuss the absurd fact taht many Americans suddenly lose their right to carry a firearm for self defense the minute they cross a state line. The case of Shaffer v. Quattrone was just filed in the Western District of New York.

  255. @AnotherDad
    BTW, I assume some other folks here have seen that poll on Democrat voter preferences for 2028.

    Kamala Harris was the top choice. And not just "first among equals" but the overwhelming choice of 41% with the rest in single digits.

    Harris -- 41
    Newsome -- 8
    Shapiro -- 7
    Butty -- 6 (LOL)
    Walz -- 6 (LOL who are these people?)
    AOC -- 4 (at least has something going for her up front)

    I realize that Harris will not be the nominee, and that this 41% has got to be mostly a psychological loyal oath--"I was right to vote for her". Still, one would hope that there was general awareness that their candidate was terrible--both empty and unpleasant. More and more the Democrats look not like an old style political party, but adherents of this bizarre minoritarian religion. A psychosis.

    Replies: @epebble

    On the other hand, if we have a 2008 like financial event or 2020 like biological event, she is a shoo in, like Obama or Biden?

  256. @Anon
    OT: I've been thinking about the difference between Democrats and Republicans. To piss of democrats, you have to make a steak out of one of their sacred cows. You have to say something negative about gays, women, blacks, or transgender prostitutes. To piss off Republicans, all you have to do is quote their leaders, in context. That's all it takes to puncture their fantasies. Here's Pete Hegseth:

    Simply put: if you don’t understand why Israel matters and why it is so central to the story of Western civilization—with America being its greatest manifestation—then you don’t live in history. America’s story is inextricably linked to Judeo-Christian history and the modern state of Israel. You can love America without loving Israel but that tells me your knowledge of the Bible and Western civilization is woefully incomplete
    Or here's Dr. Oz supporting transing of very young children:

    https://twitter.com/ShadowofEzra/status/1858995616161890670

    The psychology is this:

    1. I want X and I think Trump will give it to me.
    2. He won't give you X.
    3. Ok, I won't get X. But I'm pissed off at you, libtard, for taking my fantasy away from me, and I will support Trump just to piss you off. I'm going to redouble my Trump support now.

    Replies: @William Badwhite, @Wokechoke

    It’s Hesketh. Which would much more anglo.

  257. anonymous[346] •�Disclaimer says:
    @jb
    Steve, in reference to your Johnny Carson Substack post:

    I’m going to go back to running a higher proportion of paywalled items. The way Substack works is that you only get to post comments on a paywalled item if you have a paying subscription.

    Or I can make items readable all the way through by everybody and let anybody post comments.

    Unfortunately, Substack doesn’t let me compromise by allowing everybody to comment but only paying subscribers to see the entire post.
    Does Substack let you compromise by making items readable all the way through but restricting comments to paying subscribers? That would be the ideal. I still think you are overdoing the paywall thing. What you want to maximize your influence by maximizing the number of readers; paying subscribers will follow if you give them just a little extra, like commenting and occasional hidden posts.

    Replies: @anonymous

    Most Substack writers seem to open their locked posts or podcasts after a week or two. Even those on Patreon to do this. I do a podcast with a partner on Patreon and that’s what I do. It doesn’t seem to affect garnering new subscribers. Plus, months from now, someone searching for information on a topic I’ve commented on will be able to find me who otherwise wouldn’t. That person may become a subscriber. But Sailer doesn’t do that. So a lot of his writing will be lost to casual readers who might have become subscribers.
    Of course, how he runs his business is none of my business.

    •�Replies: @anonymous
    @anonymous

    Maybe Sailer is having trouble getting paying subscribers because what he writes isn't worth paying for. His latest substack post on RFK is an example. As commenter Alex DeLarge replied to it, "Steve, this is a lazy, low IQ take that doesn't deserve to be taken seriously at all."
    That applies to a lot of what Sailer has been writing recently. His take on the American Navy's latest submarine was ignorant, arrogant and stupid. He was called out in detail on it by a commenter and a reporter for the Telegraph saw that and did a proper story based not on what Sailer wrote but what the commenter wrote. Sailer should be ashamed of that.
    Sailer also flew off on a tangent ridiculing women who were members of sororities in their college years, so attacking the women mostly likely to be engaged with the wider society and successful in life, women such as Ellen Taaffe Zwilich, Margaret Brewer, Betty Nguyen, Erin Andrews, Phyllis George, Geralyn Lucas and Shonda Shilling, all of whom were the sorority girls that Sailer, for some reason, sneers at. What gain does Sailer derive from doing that? How does that attract paying subscribers?
    Sailer not only seems past his prime, but he doesn't even seem to be trying any more. Maybe he's just bored with this gig and is only continuing to do it to get some money, which is understandable. But why a subscriber would pay for it is beyond me.
    He reminds me of Theodore Dalrymple, who once wrote very compelling books and columns but nowadays seems to be phoning it in. His columns are worth nothing more than a glance anymore, if that. Ditto Sailer.

    Replies: @Mark G.
  258. UK really gone downhill…

  259. @AnotherDad
    @Reg Cæsar


    The New York Times assembled a longitudinal focus group of young undecideds months ago, and followed up at times during the campaign. They decided in the last week, and Trump took most of them. And a common factor in their decision was J.D. Vance, who gave some heft to the ticket.
    Not just Johnson but a handful of other commenters were tossing out anti-Vance dumbshittery as well.

    I fully realize I'm not normative for the American population. Vance is a bit young. But I really like having leaders who are smart and highly articulate, who can explain ideas, problems and solutions clearly. Not Trump's strong suit--and an even more stingy contrast to vapid Kamala and doofus Walz.

    Vance is a core American midwesterner from a working class--disordered working class--background. And guess what, Trump/Vance absolutely bolts down Ohio--a previously Republican leaning swinger, and sweeps all the plausibile Midwest industrial swingers, on the way to victory. Maybe it isn't just me? Maybe other Americans also like having politicians who are intelligent and can string together coherent sentences?

    Replies: @Mark G., @Reg Cæsar, @Mr. Anon, @Manfred Arcane

    Vance is a core American midwesterner from a working class–disordered working class–background.

    Trump and Vance share a valuable skill: both can speak to those outside their own class. Way outside.

    Vance is kind of like a Clinton with morals.

  260. OT – but late breaking holocaust news as the most notorious Nazi ever to have lived, Ursula Haverbeck, has finally been sent to the 6 millionth level of hell for the worst crime ever of denying the holocaust:

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/ursula-haverbeck-german-far-right-activist-repeatedly-convicted-for-holocaust-denial-dies-at-96/ar-AA1uuJkD

    Jack D and friends: may you sleep a little sounder tonight, knowing that this mortal enemy of yours might no longer be able to sneak into your house and gum you to death (verified method of extermination documented at the Nuremberg thingy – Elie Weasel said he was in charge of holding old ladies’ dentures while they gummed countless inmates to death.)

    •�Thanks: YetAnotherAnon
    •�Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
    @Mike Tre

    I've noticed that "news" providers nowadays have to add little indicator words - apparently she was "notorious".

    It must be said she was a very brave woman, denying the secular equivalent of Christ's divinity. And it must be said that she was "only" imprisoned, when a few hundred years back a blasphemer like her might have been killed.

    I do wonder if the brutal treatment of civilian Germans, first by RAF Bomber Command, then by the Red Army, then by the post-war occupation and starvation, hasn't burned something into the collective German soul.

    Reading about the occupation of Japan, the Japanese behaved very differently. Japanese officials continued to run things, MacArthur was given parades worthy of a Caesar to keep him sweet, and the Japanese were told under all circumstances to co-operate, even when GIs were arresting women on Kyoto streets or in their homes, and examining their genitalia "for signs of venereal disease".

    The Japanese have an expression that means "to obey with the face, but to disobey with the gut".

    Replies: @Jack D, @Wokechoke
    , @Jack D
    @Mike Tre

    At what age should you become immune from criminal prosecution?

    Germany (and most European countries) doesn't have the equivalent of our 1st Amendment and so they can and do consider Holocaust denial to be a crime under their laws.

    The Germans have their reasons for having such laws. The last time Nazis took power in German, 7 or 8 million Germans died, their major cities were bombed into rubble, their country was divided for almost 50 years, major swaths of territory were lost and Germany's reputation was permanently marred, so they don't really want to repeat the exercise. The Jews did not write these laws. If you don't think that Holocaust denial should be a crime (at at any age) then write to the German legislature and ask them to repeal these laws.

    Replies: @Joe Stalin, @Anonymous
  261. @AnotherDad
    @Reg Cæsar


    The New York Times assembled a longitudinal focus group of young undecideds months ago, and followed up at times during the campaign. They decided in the last week, and Trump took most of them. And a common factor in their decision was J.D. Vance, who gave some heft to the ticket.
    Not just Johnson but a handful of other commenters were tossing out anti-Vance dumbshittery as well.

    I fully realize I'm not normative for the American population. Vance is a bit young. But I really like having leaders who are smart and highly articulate, who can explain ideas, problems and solutions clearly. Not Trump's strong suit--and an even more stingy contrast to vapid Kamala and doofus Walz.

    Vance is a core American midwesterner from a working class--disordered working class--background. And guess what, Trump/Vance absolutely bolts down Ohio--a previously Republican leaning swinger, and sweeps all the plausibile Midwest industrial swingers, on the way to victory. Maybe it isn't just me? Maybe other Americans also like having politicians who are intelligent and can string together coherent sentences?

    Replies: @Mark G., @Reg Cæsar, @Mr. Anon, @Manfred Arcane

    As you note, Vance is articulate – which Trump is not. Vance is also smart – which Trump is not. At least he seldom gives much evidence for it.

    But Vance may very well also be a rather slippery character. Vance owes his business and political career to the patronage of the gay German billionaire, Peter Thiel. You want to talk minoritarianism – that’s three minority groups right there. As billionaire oligarchs go, Thiel is probably not the worst. But he is a billionaire oligarch and I don’t trust him, nor do I necessarily trust one of his creations.

    We’ll see what they do.

    One thing the incoming Trump administration should do is start doing something tangible for the people who put them in office. Back in 2017, Steve Bannon wanted to enact a large-scale federal infrastructure project that would put money into the hands of blue collar workers, especially in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. Presumably in some reliably Red states as well. That was scotched by Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell and the rest of the Republican establishment (way to go, guys).

    There are a lot of things that need fixing in America. The Trump administration should try to fix some of them. If they don’t, then Vance or whoever runs to succeed Trump in 2028 will have nobody but themselves to blame.

    •�Agree: AnotherDad
    •�Replies: @AnotherDad
    @Mr. Anon


    One thing the incoming Trump administration should do is start doing something tangible for the people who put them in office. Back in 2017, Steve Bannon wanted to enact a large-scale federal infrastructure project that would put money into the hands of blue collar workers, especially in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. Presumably in some reliably Red states as well. That was scotched by Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell and the rest of the Republican establishment (way to go, guys).

    There are a lot of things that need fixing in America. The Trump administration should try to fix some of them. If they don’t, then Vance or whoever runs to succeed Trump in 2028 will have nobody but themselves to blame.
    Well said. Actual infrastructure--well funding it--is one of the things the government can do for actual Republican voting normies. Since my dad passed a few years back, we've been flying less but going on longer rambles across the country. And our infrastructure--politely--"needs work". I.e. woefully deficient. Our parasitic elites decided they could just keep jamming people in the country willy-nilly but god forbid some of paper-pushing ass sitting parasites be defunded in favor of actually building the roads that doubling the American population requires.

    And yeah, as with the Wall, Trump promised .... but didn't deliver. Turns out "Art of the Deal" boy got rolled by the likes of the genius Paul Ryan. Trump talks a lot, turns out seriousness and discipline in pushing your program, demanding your core priorities actually matter.

    Hopefully there is more commitment this time and more will to steam roll the obstacles whether congresscritters or the caviling kritarchy.

    One thing the incoming Trump administration should do is start doing something tangible for the people who put them in office.
    This ought to be a placard on the desk of every Trump appointee, on every screen saver in their office, a header on every Trump administration e-mail. Heck--and I hate tattoos--tattoo it on the back of their hands so they don't forget.

    "Start doing something for the people who put us in office".

    Replies: @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality
    , @Truth
    @Mr. Anon


    As you note, Vance is articulate – which Trump is not. Vance is also smart – which Trump is not. At least he seldom gives much evidence for it.
    Let me make it simple for you, Caine: Any complete nobody who gets major publishing house offers to write an "autobiography" is your enemy. Think, Barry.

    Replies: @Mr. Anon
    , @Curle
    @Mr. Anon


    Vance owes his business and political career to the patronage of the gay German billionaire, Peter Thiel.
    A detail made less alarming by the fact that Thiel is in the business of incubating businesses which in a very simple way means he’s a talent scout and in an even simpler formulation means he’s made it his business to promote lots of people the vast majority not being gay I’d venture. Whether these people feel obligated to the gay cause because of Thiel’s support I do not know. It is also the case that closeted or non-evangelizing (to the gay rights position) gays have always a large and hidden part of the Republican Party organizational structure. Trump, for instance, was himself reliant in many ways on gay New York anti-communist lawyer Roy Cohn. I believe Nixon may have leaned on Cohn as well.
  262. @Mark G.
    @AnotherDad

    "Vance is a core American Midwesterner"

    The Trump/Vance ticket turned the Republican party into a working class oriented anti-elite party. The elites tend to be concentrated in the coastal areas. The last sixty years have been very good for the elites but not anyone else. Here in Indiana, the average life expectancy was 70.5 in 1960. This was higher than the national average and Indiana ranked 18th among states in the nation. As of 2020, Indiana ranks 40th in the nation and our average life expectancy is 1.9 years below the rest of the country.

    The major factor in the decline is the hollowing out of the industrial base. Added to this recently is an influx of unwanted immigrants. The Springfield, Ohio Haitian story is happening on a smaller scale around the Midwest. All this has helped lead to what Angus Deaton calls "deaths of despair" involving increasing levels of alcoholism, drug abuse and a generally unhealthy lifestyle among working class people. I have been watching it unfold up close. As a 68 year old, I can see the difference between now and the early sixties. The working class has begun a rebellion against the people who have been running this country for their own selfish benefit.

    Replies: @Mr. Anon

    All this has helped lead to what Angus Deaton calls “deaths of despair” involving increasing levels of alcoholism, drug abuse and a generally unhealthy lifestyle among working class people.

    One of the worst things that the left did to this country – to all western countries – was to attack and undermine traditional Christianity. The loss or weakening of religious faith has had a deleterious effect on people’s lives, especially on the lives of the lower classes.

    •�Agree: TWS
    •�Replies: @Curle
    @Mr. Anon


    One of the worst things that the left did to this country – to all western countries – was to attack and undermine traditional Christianity.
    The Left? Is that the most efficient characterization?

    Replies: @Mike Tre
  263. @Bardon Kaldian
    @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality

    Iranians now are not more mixed than contemporary Greeks, Italians etc. I know this racial theory of "blood contamination leading to stupidity", but it doesn't hold water. Iran from 500-300 BC was significantly less powerful than Iran from the 8th to the 18th C, from creativity (Al Khwarizmi, Omar Khayyam, Hafiz, Rumi,..) to the military expansion (Nadir Shah & the rest). Contemporary Iranians excel in science and technology, lunatic religious ideology aside.

    If you don't want to become ill-suited for civilization:

    a) don't mix with Africans

    b) don't take Islam seriously

    Replies: @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality

    Both Italy and Greece are whiter than Iran.

  264. @Mike Tre
    @Odyssey

    For those that don’t know, Odyssey here believes the entirety of humanity is descended from a single Serbian vagina back in the days of the Garden of Eden (according to Ody, Eden translates to Serbia in Serbian).

    I suggest skimming through his comment history, especially the replies he gets. Worth a few laughs.

    Replies: @Odyssey, @Dmon

    Find one mistake in my comments and you get a free case of wine worldwide delivered.
    So far, no one has found a material error in my comments. Above you have a question – who were Emperor Justinian, his uncle Emperor Justin and his general Belisarius?
    If you answer, you get another box of wine as a bonus. I bet you won’t have the courage to answer.

    •�Replies: @anon
    @Odyssey

    not just Justinian, Constantine the Great was also from the Balkans. And Constantinople was the original Rome. This is all very well explained in Laurent Guyonet's and First Millennium revisioniist articles on this site.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer
  265. @Mr. Anon
    @Mark G.


    All this has helped lead to what Angus Deaton calls “deaths of despair” involving increasing levels of alcoholism, drug abuse and a generally unhealthy lifestyle among working class people.
    One of the worst things that the left did to this country - to all western countries - was to attack and undermine traditional Christianity. The loss or weakening of religious faith has had a deleterious effect on people's lives, especially on the lives of the lower classes.

    Replies: @Curle

    One of the worst things that the left did to this country – to all western countries – was to attack and undermine traditional Christianity.

    The Left? Is that the most efficient characterization?

    •�Replies: @Mike Tre
    @Curle

    Somewhat agree here. Not really sure the rise of evangelicalism was an overall healthy thing. I saw a lot of these people in the service and could write a few paragraphs on what I witnessed. Nothing positive about it. Also, here in Illinois, the relatively recent legalization of slot machines has facilitated a little gambling cove in every truck stop gas station, family diner, and liquor store. I enjoy poker and a few other table games but I gamble maybe once every 2-3 years and am usually quickly reminded why I do it so little. But there are people who will sit at these slot machines for hours and hours and lose who knows how much money that their family probably needed...
  266. @Dmon
    @Odyssey

    Do you mean they were born in what is now Serbia, or do you mean they were ethnic Serbs? Belisarius was (according to wikipedia) probably born in what is now Bulgaria. The Byzantine emperors had a fractious relationship with actual Bulgarians, but the later Imperial army (particularly from the 11th century on) generally employed a number of Bulgarian mercenaries. It is a little known fact that Tom Lehrer's "It Makes a Fellow Proud to be a Soldier" was not an original composition, but was actually based on a fragment of an old Byzantine army marching song:

    "Now Nicephorous Phocas is the boss of all us jerks.
    He doesn't really like it when we lose against the Turks.
    So we give 'em the Greek Fire. It's not sporting - but it works.
    It makes a fellow proud to be a Buuull-gar."

    I'm willing to entertain the idea that Belisarius was Hungarian though.

    Belisarius:
    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8b/Belisarius_mosaic.jpg

    Al Hrabosky:
    https://www.cooperstownexpert.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Al-Hrabosky-e1649276116541.jpg

    Replies: @Odyssey

    You’re trying to make a joke but you’re not succeeding. At the time Belisarius was born, the Asian Bulgars had not yet come to Europe. The indigenous Serbs lived in present-day Bulgaria. Later, the Bulgarians came to present-day Moldova with the permission of the Serbian ruler. They settled there, but after a few decades they crossed the Danube and came to present-day Bulgaria. There were few of them, so they got assimilated, adopted the Serbian language and Christianity.

    Almost all modern Bulgarians are ethnic i.e. genetic Serbs and only a small percentage are descendants of the Asian Bulgars, but their name has remained. As for the Hungarians, they came from Asia even later, in 896 AC, i.e. several hundred years after Belisarius and Justinian. In present-day Hungary, there were also indigenous Serbs. So that joke didn’t work for you either.

    Justinian built the city of Justiniana Prima in his native remote village in Serbia. His uncle, Emperor Justin, was born in a neighbouring village.

    Computer animation of Justinian Prima, the center of the province of Illyricum (5 min):

    •�Replies: @Dmon
    @Odyssey

    Hey - Belisarius was born in what was then Pannonia, which included parts of modern day Bulgaria and Hungary. If you're retroactively turning Illyrians into Serbians, then I can call Belisarius a Hungarian.

    You have to admit though - Belisarius doesn't look at all Serbian. Here's Johnny Miljus, ace reliever for the 1927 Pirates, who lost the World Series to the Ruth-Gehrig "Murderer's Row" Yankees in 4 straight. His nickname was "The Big Serb", a century before Jokic.
    https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/--sAAOSwQx9kekeD/s-l400.jpg

    Here's Dr. Slobodan Cuk, longtime head of the Power Electronics Curriculum at Cal Tech, and inventor of the Cuk Converter, advertised as "the optimum topology DC-DC converter" due to it's zero output ripple properties (you have to tweak the leakage inductance of the coupled inductor just s0 though). He is an ardent Serb0phile, and named his company Teslaco. He looks alot more like Slobodan Milosevic than he does like Belisarius.
    https://teslaco.us/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/bio-pic-01-243x300.jpg

    Also, Justinian's wife was a whore. And apparently a damn good one. But that doesn't make her Indo-Jamaican.

    Replies: @Odyssey
  267. @Mike Tre
    Yes they should, because Denzel Washington is probably a really nice guy.

    Replies: @Nicholas Stix
    •�Replies: @Mike Tre
    @Nicholas Stix

    Thanks.

    I suppose we can all be forgiven for forgetting that Washington's casting in GII isn't the first time he's been gratuitously inserted into a European period piece:

    https://cps-static.rovicorp.com/1/avg/cov584/drv400/v493/v49386fvbri.jpg

    Replies: @Mr. Anon
  268. @Odyssey
    @Mike Tre

    Find one mistake in my comments and you get a free case of wine worldwide delivered.
    So far, no one has found a material error in my comments. Above you have a question - who were Emperor Justinian, his uncle Emperor Justin and his general Belisarius?
    If you answer, you get another box of wine as a bonus. I bet you won't have the courage to answer.

    Replies: @anon

    not just Justinian, Constantine the Great was also from the Balkans. And Constantinople was the original Rome. This is all very well explained in Laurent Guyonet’s and First Millennium revisioniist articles on this site.

    •�Replies: @Steve Sailer
    @anon

    I can recall some historian saying that after the disasters of the third century, the Roman Empire was saved by "hard men from the Balkans."
  269. Anon[408] •�Disclaimer says:
    @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @Ministry Of Tongues

    "There is a world of difference between “We want stories about us” and “All stories must be about us.”"

    A good point; but really, if you want to get down to it, it's actually more like, "All of *your* stories must now be about *us*."

    I don't know if Steve agrees with this, but it would be interesting to see him put his film-critic hat on and do an overview of the latest fad: the Jordan Peele-led "Black! horror movie" craze. My feeling is, none of these movies work as horror, or even *can* work (especially not "Get Out"), because culturally blacks have no horror tradition to build out from, and specifically no tradition of the Gothic or of the uncanny (hell, it's *all* uncanny -- see Amos Tutuole); and no interesting science fiction either, because no actual science in the first place. The subtext of all these movies is --you guess it-- slabery, once again, as if that's really something to be afraid of in this day and age, but what else they got?; and maybe those dopey black-specific superstitions, like being weirdly unusually afraid of snakes (is that even true, or do they just fake it because it's an identity-reinforcement thing?).

    Horror, like comedy, works because it warps the straight line. The problem is that blacks believe so many ridiculously stupid, patently false things, that for them, there is no straight line to begin with.

    Replies: @Anon, @Ministry Of Tongues

    A trend in horror movies and also movies in general right now is pushing the strong female lead, and typically she’s mulatto or accompanied by a black man. On the rare occasion there’s male lead, he’s always accompanied by a strong woman chauffeur. It’s really getting monotonous at this point and I hope the trend goes by the wayside.

    -Rooster

  270. @anon
    @Odyssey

    not just Justinian, Constantine the Great was also from the Balkans. And Constantinople was the original Rome. This is all very well explained in Laurent Guyonet's and First Millennium revisioniist articles on this site.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer

    I can recall some historian saying that after the disasters of the third century, the Roman Empire was saved by “hard men from the Balkans.”

  271. @J.Ross
    OT -- When You're America's Friend -- A German anon said:

    Bosch
    They gonna fire at least 3800 people in Germany.
    https://www.zdf.de/nachrichten/wirtschaft/bosch-stellen-abbau-deutschland-100.html

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon

    The German economy is deep in the doo-doo, but then so is the entire European “green” economy. China are eating their lunch.

    “Northvolt CEO resigns as Europe’s big hope for a battery champion files for bankruptcy”

    https://www.cnbc.com/2024/11/22/northvolt-files-for-bankruptcy-in-setback-to-europes-ev-ambitions.html

    “Britishvolt: how Britain’s bright battery future fell flat”

    https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/jan/20/britishvolt-britains-battery-startup-uk-car-production

  272. @AnotherDad
    @Reg Cæsar


    The New York Times assembled a longitudinal focus group of young undecideds months ago, and followed up at times during the campaign. They decided in the last week, and Trump took most of them. And a common factor in their decision was J.D. Vance, who gave some heft to the ticket.
    Not just Johnson but a handful of other commenters were tossing out anti-Vance dumbshittery as well.

    I fully realize I'm not normative for the American population. Vance is a bit young. But I really like having leaders who are smart and highly articulate, who can explain ideas, problems and solutions clearly. Not Trump's strong suit--and an even more stingy contrast to vapid Kamala and doofus Walz.

    Vance is a core American midwesterner from a working class--disordered working class--background. And guess what, Trump/Vance absolutely bolts down Ohio--a previously Republican leaning swinger, and sweeps all the plausibile Midwest industrial swingers, on the way to victory. Maybe it isn't just me? Maybe other Americans also like having politicians who are intelligent and can string together coherent sentences?

    Replies: @Mark G., @Reg Cæsar, @Mr. Anon, @Manfred Arcane

    Vance, interestingly, triggers both the Establishment “conservatives” like John Johnson and the dissident right conspiracy obsessives, like Vox Day and The Conservative Treehouse’s Sundance. America’s favorite Psycho Ex-Girlfriend, Ann Coulter, also switched from praising him to excorciating him after Catlady-Gate, although she may be back to praising him by now (the lady is a bit unstable). And, of course, the left loathes him for even daring to suggest that old America is worth preserving. For a guy who has so many vocal enemies, he seems remarkably unflappable, and able to keep things from getting under his skin, unlike Trump. Also, while he lacks Trump’s towering charisma, he shares his ability to connect effortlessly with normal people, something even good politicians have trouble with; much as I admire DeSantis, he came off as stiff and grumpy in campaign speeches, while Vance has a natural ease. I think Trump has done well in picking a successor.

    •�Thanks: TWS
    •�Replies: @Joe Stalin
    @Manfred Arcane


    America’s favorite Psycho Ex-Girlfriend, Ann Coulter, also switched from praising him to excorciating him after Catlady-Gate, although she may be back to praising him by now (the lady is a bit unstable).
    Years ago on WLS-AM radio there was a Don Wade & Roma program where Wade announced Coulter would call in to talk. Never showed, and Wade said something along the line she was never coming on again. Never did before he kicked the bucket.
  273. @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @Anonymous

    I just threw up a little in my mouth.

    Can't wait for the second commercial, when it breaks down in the middle of the countryside.

    Replies: @Brutusale

    Aston Martin knows its customers.

    •�Replies: @Ralph L
    @Brutusale

    "Pre-Owed" sounds about right.
    , @Je Suis Omar Mateen
    @Brutusale

    That's gotta be AI: drawers or safe deposit boxes waay above the countertop, a fullsize faucet plus hazy baby faucet two feet away, about a foot of dead space betwixt wall and island....... and a 12-year-old boy in FMPs. So their target customer is a pedo who hires impossibly sh**ty carpenters?

    Replies: @Brutusale, @Isabel Archer
    , @Corvinus
    @Brutusale

    You ought to be proud of your daughter in that photograph, with her carefree attiude. I know I am!
    , @Mr. Anon
    @Brutusale

    That almost looks like an AI-generated woman.

    The only kind Corvinus will ever date.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
    , @AnotherDad
    @Brutusale

    Sexy model and pic. But not an actual Aston-Martin ad.

    Is however a reminder of the beauty that is being destroyed by listening to these parasitic loons and their nation destroying ideology.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @Je Suis Omar Mateen
  274. @Mike Tre
    OT - but late breaking holocaust news as the most notorious Nazi ever to have lived, Ursula Haverbeck, has finally been sent to the 6 millionth level of hell for the worst crime ever of denying the holocaust:

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/ursula-haverbeck-german-far-right-activist-repeatedly-convicted-for-holocaust-denial-dies-at-96/ar-AA1uuJkD

    Jack D and friends: may you sleep a little sounder tonight, knowing that this mortal enemy of yours might no longer be able to sneak into your house and gum you to death (verified method of extermination documented at the Nuremberg thingy - Elie Weasel said he was in charge of holding old ladies' dentures while they gummed countless inmates to death.)

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @Jack D

    I’ve noticed that “news” providers nowadays have to add little indicator words – apparently she was “notorious”.

    It must be said she was a very brave woman, denying the secular equivalent of Christ’s divinity. And it must be said that she was “only” imprisoned, when a few hundred years back a blasphemer like her might have been killed.

    I do wonder if the brutal treatment of civilian Germans, first by RAF Bomber Command, then by the Red Army, then by the post-war occupation and starvation, hasn’t burned something into the collective German soul.

    Reading about the occupation of Japan, the Japanese behaved very differently. Japanese officials continued to run things, MacArthur was given parades worthy of a Caesar to keep him sweet, and the Japanese were told under all circumstances to co-operate, even when GIs were arresting women on Kyoto streets or in their homes, and examining their genitalia “for signs of venereal disease”.

    The Japanese have an expression that means “to obey with the face, but to disobey with the gut”.

    •�Thanks: Mike Tre
    •�Replies: @Jack D
    @YetAnotherAnon


    I do wonder if the brutal treatment of civilian Germans, first by RAF Bomber Command, then by the Red Army, then by the post-war occupation and starvation, hasn’t burned something into the collective German soul.
    Yes, it did. It burned into 99% of them never to follow a mad fascist dictator making promises of German glory into ruin again. From now on stick to making high quality export goods and leave the global adventures to the Americans. Why invade Britain or Poland if you can just sell them BMW's and Mercedes and make good $?

    1% of them were die hard Hitler followers and didn't draw the right lesson.

    Replies: @mc23, @Colin Wright, @YetAnotherAnon, @James B. Shearer
    , @Wokechoke
    @YetAnotherAnon

    The Blitz did burn something into the English. Which they metered out 10 fold back.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
  275. @Brutusale
    @The Germ Theory of Disease

    Aston Martin knows its customers.
    https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/Gc2ClspWEAAhHVw.jpg?itok=SNMWFXxQ

    Replies: @Ralph L, @Je Suis Omar Mateen, @Corvinus, @Mr. Anon, @AnotherDad

    “Pre-Owed” sounds about right.

  276. @Mr. Anon
    @AnotherDad

    As you note, Vance is articulate - which Trump is not. Vance is also smart - which Trump is not. At least he seldom gives much evidence for it.

    But Vance may very well also be a rather slippery character. Vance owes his business and political career to the patronage of the gay German billionaire, Peter Thiel. You want to talk minoritarianism - that's three minority groups right there. As billionaire oligarchs go, Thiel is probably not the worst. But he is a billionaire oligarch and I don't trust him, nor do I necessarily trust one of his creations.

    We'll see what they do.

    One thing the incoming Trump administration should do is start doing something tangible for the people who put them in office. Back in 2017, Steve Bannon wanted to enact a large-scale federal infrastructure project that would put money into the hands of blue collar workers, especially in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. Presumably in some reliably Red states as well. That was scotched by Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell and the rest of the Republican establishment (way to go, guys).

    There are a lot of things that need fixing in America. The Trump administration should try to fix some of them. If they don't, then Vance or whoever runs to succeed Trump in 2028 will have nobody but themselves to blame.

    Replies: @AnotherDad, @Truth, @Curle

    One thing the incoming Trump administration should do is start doing something tangible for the people who put them in office. Back in 2017, Steve Bannon wanted to enact a large-scale federal infrastructure project that would put money into the hands of blue collar workers, especially in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. Presumably in some reliably Red states as well. That was scotched by Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell and the rest of the Republican establishment (way to go, guys).

    There are a lot of things that need fixing in America. The Trump administration should try to fix some of them. If they don’t, then Vance or whoever runs to succeed Trump in 2028 will have nobody but themselves to blame.

    Well said. Actual infrastructure–well funding it–is one of the things the government can do for actual Republican voting normies. Since my dad passed a few years back, we’ve been flying less but going on longer rambles across the country. And our infrastructure–politely–“needs work”. I.e. woefully deficient. Our parasitic elites decided they could just keep jamming people in the country willy-nilly but god forbid some of paper-pushing ass sitting parasites be defunded in favor of actually building the roads that doubling the American population requires.

    And yeah, as with the Wall, Trump promised …. but didn’t deliver. Turns out “Art of the Deal” boy got rolled by the likes of the genius Paul Ryan. Trump talks a lot, turns out seriousness and discipline in pushing your program, demanding your core priorities actually matter.

    Hopefully there is more commitment this time and more will to steam roll the obstacles whether congresscritters or the caviling kritarchy.

    One thing the incoming Trump administration should do is start doing something tangible for the people who put them in office.

    This ought to be a placard on the desk of every Trump appointee, on every screen saver in their office, a header on every Trump administration e-mail. Heck–and I hate tattoos–tattoo it on the back of their hands so they don’t forget.

    “Start doing something for the people who put us in office”.

    •�Replies: @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality
    @AnotherDad

    Let's just hope we make it until Jan 20th without the Usual Suspects getting us in WWIII. They are trying hard right now.
  277. @Anonymous
    Hey, Denzel is cool. Let's not be racist.

    https://twitter.com/landofangle/status/1859321734320763133

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @Grand Marquis de Sade, @YetAnotherAnon, @AnotherDad

    Girls and homos.

    But somewhere up the chain there is a white man who was too brain-addled or too pussyified to just stand up and say “no”.

    Unless white men start acting like men and take back control of the West–we’re done.

  278. @Odyssey
    @mc23

    Cleopatra was the last member of the Ptolemaic dynasty. Ptolemy himself was given Egypt to rule after the poisoning of Alexander the Great. Alexander himself, as well as his dukes/generals - Seleucus (who gained Persia), Cassander (who gained the Balkans), and Ptolemy were Serbs, although those who are quite late in mental development think that Alexander was Greek.

    Replies: @AnotherDad, @Apostolos, @mc23

    Cleopatra was the last member of the Ptolemaic dynasty. Ptolemy himself was given Egypt to rule after the poisoning of Alexander the Great. Alexander himself, as well as his dukes/generals – Seleucus (who gained Persia), Cassander (who gained the Balkans), and Ptolemy were Serbs, although those who are quite late in mental development think that Alexander was Greek.

    Serbs? LOL. Everyone–above the mental age of 3–knows Alex and his generals were Irish.

  279. @Curle
    @Mr. Anon


    One of the worst things that the left did to this country – to all western countries – was to attack and undermine traditional Christianity.
    The Left? Is that the most efficient characterization?

    Replies: @Mike Tre

    Somewhat agree here. Not really sure the rise of evangelicalism was an overall healthy thing. I saw a lot of these people in the service and could write a few paragraphs on what I witnessed. Nothing positive about it. Also, here in Illinois, the relatively recent legalization of slot machines has facilitated a little gambling cove in every truck stop gas station, family diner, and liquor store. I enjoy poker and a few other table games but I gamble maybe once every 2-3 years and am usually quickly reminded why I do it so little. But there are people who will sit at these slot machines for hours and hours and lose who knows how much money that their family probably needed…

  280. @Brutusale
    @The Germ Theory of Disease

    Aston Martin knows its customers.
    https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/Gc2ClspWEAAhHVw.jpg?itok=SNMWFXxQ

    Replies: @Ralph L, @Je Suis Omar Mateen, @Corvinus, @Mr. Anon, @AnotherDad

    That’s gotta be AI: drawers or safe deposit boxes waay above the countertop, a fullsize faucet plus hazy baby faucet two feet away, about a foot of dead space betwixt wall and island……. and a 12-year-old boy in FMPs. So their target customer is a pedo who hires impossibly sh**ty carpenters?

    •�Replies: @Brutusale
    @Je Suis Omar Mateen

    It's a proto-deep fake from 10 years ago.

    https://www.carscoops.com/2013/02/aston-martin-used-car-ad-takedown/

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @Jack D
    , @Isabel Archer
    @Je Suis Omar Mateen

    What are FMPs? A Google search doesn't explain this acronym.

    Replies: @Je Suis Omar Mateen
  281. @AnotherDad
    @Mr. Anon


    One thing the incoming Trump administration should do is start doing something tangible for the people who put them in office. Back in 2017, Steve Bannon wanted to enact a large-scale federal infrastructure project that would put money into the hands of blue collar workers, especially in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. Presumably in some reliably Red states as well. That was scotched by Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell and the rest of the Republican establishment (way to go, guys).

    There are a lot of things that need fixing in America. The Trump administration should try to fix some of them. If they don’t, then Vance or whoever runs to succeed Trump in 2028 will have nobody but themselves to blame.
    Well said. Actual infrastructure--well funding it--is one of the things the government can do for actual Republican voting normies. Since my dad passed a few years back, we've been flying less but going on longer rambles across the country. And our infrastructure--politely--"needs work". I.e. woefully deficient. Our parasitic elites decided they could just keep jamming people in the country willy-nilly but god forbid some of paper-pushing ass sitting parasites be defunded in favor of actually building the roads that doubling the American population requires.

    And yeah, as with the Wall, Trump promised .... but didn't deliver. Turns out "Art of the Deal" boy got rolled by the likes of the genius Paul Ryan. Trump talks a lot, turns out seriousness and discipline in pushing your program, demanding your core priorities actually matter.

    Hopefully there is more commitment this time and more will to steam roll the obstacles whether congresscritters or the caviling kritarchy.

    One thing the incoming Trump administration should do is start doing something tangible for the people who put them in office.
    This ought to be a placard on the desk of every Trump appointee, on every screen saver in their office, a header on every Trump administration e-mail. Heck--and I hate tattoos--tattoo it on the back of their hands so they don't forget.

    "Start doing something for the people who put us in office".

    Replies: @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality

    Let’s just hope we make it until Jan 20th without the Usual Suspects getting us in WWIII. They are trying hard right now.

  282. @Nicholas Stix
    @Mike Tre

    "Denzel Washington, Bully?"

    https://nicholasstixuncensored.blogspot.com/2012/01/denzel-washington-bully.html

    Replies: @Mike Tre

    Thanks.

    I suppose we can all be forgiven for forgetting that Washington’s casting in GII isn’t the first time he’s been gratuitously inserted into a European period piece:

    •�Replies: @Mr. Anon
    @Mike Tre

    Shakespeare is drama, not history. It is typically held to a different standard of realism. If a black actor is cast as Julius Caesar or Macbeth in those plays, I don't mind, as long as he turns in a good performance.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Mike Tre, @Curle
  283. @Brutusale
    @The Germ Theory of Disease

    Aston Martin knows its customers.
    https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/Gc2ClspWEAAhHVw.jpg?itok=SNMWFXxQ

    Replies: @Ralph L, @Je Suis Omar Mateen, @Corvinus, @Mr. Anon, @AnotherDad

    You ought to be proud of your daughter in that photograph, with her carefree attiude. I know I am!

  284. @Odyssey
    @Dmon

    You're trying to make a joke but you're not succeeding. At the time Belisarius was born, the Asian Bulgars had not yet come to Europe. The indigenous Serbs lived in present-day Bulgaria. Later, the Bulgarians came to present-day Moldova with the permission of the Serbian ruler. They settled there, but after a few decades they crossed the Danube and came to present-day Bulgaria. There were few of them, so they got assimilated, adopted the Serbian language and Christianity.

    Almost all modern Bulgarians are ethnic i.e. genetic Serbs and only a small percentage are descendants of the Asian Bulgars, but their name has remained. As for the Hungarians, they came from Asia even later, in 896 AC, i.e. several hundred years after Belisarius and Justinian. In present-day Hungary, there were also indigenous Serbs. So that joke didn't work for you either.

    Justinian built the city of Justiniana Prima in his native remote village in Serbia. His uncle, Emperor Justin, was born in a neighbouring village.

    Computer animation of Justinian Prima, the center of the province of Illyricum (5 min):

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhG_Ry3D8bU

    Replies: @Dmon

    Hey – Belisarius was born in what was then Pannonia, which included parts of modern day Bulgaria and Hungary. If you’re retroactively turning Illyrians into Serbians, then I can call Belisarius a Hungarian.

    You have to admit though – Belisarius doesn’t look at all Serbian. Here’s Johnny Miljus, ace reliever for the 1927 Pirates, who lost the World Series to the Ruth-Gehrig “Murderer’s Row” Yankees in 4 straight. His nickname was “The Big Serb”, a century before Jokic.

    Here’s Dr. Slobodan Cuk, longtime head of the Power Electronics Curriculum at Cal Tech, and inventor of the Cuk Converter, advertised as “the optimum topology DC-DC converter” due to it’s zero output ripple properties (you have to tweak the leakage inductance of the coupled inductor just s0 though). He is an ardent Serb0phile, and named his company Teslaco. He looks alot more like Slobodan Milosevic than he does like Belisarius.

    Also, Justinian’s wife was a whore. And apparently a damn good one. But that doesn’t make her Indo-Jamaican.

    •�Replies: @Odyssey
    @Dmon

    Thanks for the information about Johnny Miljus, which almost no one here knows about since we don't even consider baseball a sport. All that chewing tobacco, spitting, and scrambling the balls, and all that in nothing less than the World Series (with Cubans), lol...give me a break. The only thing worth remembering in baseball was Geena Davis' split in A League of Their Own.

    I see that you have a sincere desire to learn, so I'll tell you right away that you're in the right place and in safe hands. Just stick with me and you'll have access to a treasure trove of knowledge. For starters, look at #206. I know, you know that Justinian was a Serb (Panzer Tre immediately got lost after expressing his doubts and didn't have the courage to speculate what else he could be, since there's simply no other option). Later we'll uncover another major Panzer forgery in this thread. If you are of Hungarian descent, just say so, I have interesting things for you.

    You're probably an electro-guy if you know Slobodan Čuk (his last name means night (or small) owl, in Serbian). I had the opportunity to hear one of his lectures. Otherwise, he was one of many Serbian professors (e.g. Šiljak, Santa Clara) who laid the foundations of NASA (also Cisco). So, it's not just basketball players who come there. He taught at CalTech but despite his tenure, he was fired in 1999 along with the beginning of the bombing of Serbia.

    He has several inventions and his Ćuk converter is famous. The Illyrians were Serbs and you probably know that there are at least two basic types of Serbs, Dinarides and Pannonians. Dinarides are mountain types, with long limbs, thin and tough, according to wiki they are the tallest people in the world, have a predisposition for sports (e.g. NBA), while Pannonians are plains dwellers.

    Here are two Dinarides for you (40 sec):
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kp-AW3BO-Cg

    Replies: @Odyssey
  285. OT – But I highly recommend watching this video on RFK and health in general:

    •�Thanks: Mark G.
  286. @Mike Tre
    @Odyssey

    For those that don’t know, Odyssey here believes the entirety of humanity is descended from a single Serbian vagina back in the days of the Garden of Eden (according to Ody, Eden translates to Serbia in Serbian).

    I suggest skimming through his comment history, especially the replies he gets. Worth a few laughs.

    Replies: @Odyssey, @Dmon

    You sound like a typical Panzer mind.

  287. @Brutusale
    @The Germ Theory of Disease

    Aston Martin knows its customers.
    https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/Gc2ClspWEAAhHVw.jpg?itok=SNMWFXxQ

    Replies: @Ralph L, @Je Suis Omar Mateen, @Corvinus, @Mr. Anon, @AnotherDad

    That almost looks like an AI-generated woman.

    The only kind Corvinus will ever date.

    •�Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
    @Mr. Anon

    She's a Dutch model called Rosa Jongenelen. Impressively long legs.

    Many moons ago I wandered into my village shop one Friday afternoon, and there was a ridiculously tall and very well turned out young lady in front of me - model-like - not a typical customer at all.

    Turned out she was a daughter of the "big house" in the village, and her employment was dancing at the Crazy Horse in Paris.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crazy_Horse_(cabaret)
  288. OT – Democracy!

    German Lutheran Church Bans AfD Members From Committees, Calls Party ‘Anti-Human’

    Germany’s Lutheran Church will now exclude members of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party from any leadership positions due to the party’s politics.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/german-lutheran-church-bans-afd-members-committees-calls-party-anti-human

    Of course the church in German is state funded.

    There is also a move afoot to ban the AfD, now the second most popular political party – because Democracy.

    •�Replies: @muggles
    @Mr. Anon


    There is also a move afoot to ban the AfD, now the second most popular political party – because Democracy.
    That was the real goal of the Harris/Obama/Pelosi takeover.

    Maybe in Year 2, when you are settled in with judges and DAs and the media, you push for that.

    "Save Democracy!" was a Harris campaign theme.

    If the GOP was going all-Trump, time to take it out like they were doing to Trump and his former employees.

    Didn't work out for them. Germany is entering a self-created recession. Banning real opposition will only work for so long.

    With Putin cutting their undersea cables to Scandinavia, factories closing and exports dwindling in a newly created energy poor nation, the status quo has got to go.
  289. @Anon
    @Bardon Kaldian

    I’ll fix this a bit… (((Those people))) in America who run the media have told blacks that they were ancient achievers, therefore they’ve developed a complex about it. Remove (((those people))) and the blacks in America simply wouldn’t care either.

    -Rooster

    Replies: @Jack D

    That’s ridiculous. The blacks who are into the Hotep/We Wuz Kangs stuff are also the blacks who are the most anti-Semitic and the ones who are most detached from mainstream and academic media sources.

    Getting rid of Joos is not the all purpose solution to all of America’s ills that the Men of Unz seem to think it is. You will still have your blacks (which BTW YOU and not the Jews brought here) and they will be just as troublesome as they have been for the last 400 years.

    If blacks are less troublesome in other countries it is because WASPs were always wooly headed and had a soft spot in their bleeding hearts for them and for every other type of loser. Was there ever any equivalent of the New England abolitionist movement in Brazil?

    •�Replies: @Mark G.
    @Jack D

    "WASPs were always wooly headed"

    Everyone else always picks on us poor old WASPs. Brazil abolished slavery too, so they also had an abolitionist movement. Very few people now would think slavery is a good thing so Britain ending the slave trade and the New England abolitionists here working to end the practice in this country did the right thing.

    Blacks will always be a problem. That problem, though, has been exacerbated over the last sixty years by welfare programs, affirmative action, and soft on crime policies advocated by liberals. While the majority of liberals are not Jews, the majority of Jews are liberal. Even a pro-Israel conservative like Trump only got about thirty percent of the Jewish vote. So, while I would not blame Jews for all the ills of society, they may do more harm than good as a group.
    , @AnotherDad
    @Jack D

    Yes and no.

    The blacks who are into the Hotep/We Wuz Kangs stuff are also the blacks who are the most anti-Semitic and the ones who are most detached from mainstream and academic media sources.
    Obviously, blacks are quite capable of ginning up all sorts we wuz kangs nonsense on their own. See Elijah Muhammed.

    But mainstream society humoring and worse elite institutions parroting this crap was essentially non-existent until the rise of the Jews pushing minoritarianism, centering big bad whitey's "oppression" as the core American narrative--and font of virtue/status for the "oppressed"--using blacks' experience of slavery, Jim Crow--Jews own "oppression" in America being too trivial for anyone to take seriously--as the cudgel to beat on and delegitimate whitey, majoritarian republicanism, America.

    And no, I don't have to make this up, because Jewish leaders always go and trot out the great black-Jewish alliance (of resisting evil whitey's oppression) whenever they need to get the rambunctious negros back on side (i.e. supporting what Jews want to do).

    If blacks are less troublesome in other countries it is because WASPs were always wooly headed and had a soft spot in their bleeding hearts for them and for every other type of loser. Was there ever any equivalent of the New England abolitionist movement in Brazil?
    It's the WASPs!

    Abolition drew on some strains of Christian do-gooder utopianism, that have to be checked in the real world. But abolition of slavery is of course a good thing and unsurprising that WASPs were at the forefront of it.

    The West was on a strong upward trajectory--Christianity, abolishing serfdom, modern science, technological advance, movement toward republican equality. The sort of "we're all in this together" human progress easier to get in more one-peopleish nations unburdened by too much caste diversity or tedious middle-man minorities. Slavery was serious backstep for the West, that came with encountering primitive peoples along with opportunity to exploit new raw land. The siren call of "cheap labor!" to make big profits was too great. It was goodness that there were WASPs who wanted to steer the West back on track--and help stamp out this scourge world wide. Of course, these sentiments were not unique to Anglos, lots of Christian folks wished to rid themselves of slavery. Brazil--the biggest slave state in the New World--with a different, Catholic, culture abolished slavery a generation later (and without a big war). The huge difficulty, of course, was that we could not put the ink back in the bottle--reverse the 1619 mistake.

    Far from "wooly headed" the salient philosophical/ideological characteristics of WASPs--Anglos--has been "empiricism". They went out into the world and observed what actually existed--studied it, tried to figure out what was going on. They might argue for a generation, but the guy who was backed up with the data would win the Royal Society debate in the end. Anglos dealt with the world as it is. And--generally--did stuff that worked. The Anglo nations used to be some of the best places on earth to live.

    It was Jews--not WASPs--who cooked up all this anti-empirical, thoroughly "wooly headed" "race does not exist" nonsense. It was your boys like Stephen J. Gould or Richard Lewontin doing the old Jewish "I yap therefore it is true" fantasizing (lying)--not their WASPy antagonists James Watson or E.O. Wilson mired in empirical reality. (And likewise with all the anti-IQ stuff on the psychology side. Anglo empiricism and progress, versus Jewish anti-scientific fantasizing, obfuscating and lying.)

    One need only compare the trajectory of America under the WASPs versus with the post-coup "under new management" regime. The sad reality is American Jews--given such an incredible opportunity by America--have been extremely destructive--ideologically, culturally, politically--to the American nation. And through dominance--and willingness to shout their lies louder--of American academia and media flooded the rest of the West, and to a lesser extent the world with their anti-empirical nonsense and minoritarian bilge.

    But we get it. You're a Jew. Jews good. Nobel Prizes, sunshine and blue skies. It's the "wooly headed" WASPs.

    Replies: @Jack D, @Anonymous
    , @Curle
    @Jack D


    Was there ever any equivalent of the New England abolitionist movement
    There were different varieties of abolitionist including the free them so they aren’t compelled to flee North abolitionists.
    , @newrouter
    @Jack D

    "(which BTW YOU and not the Jews brought here)"

    lol Revisionist history to make the tribe like "wez didntdo nuthin" with the slave trade to the Americas
  290. anonymous[320] •�Disclaimer says:
    @anonymous
    @jb

    Most Substack writers seem to open their locked posts or podcasts after a week or two. Even those on Patreon to do this. I do a podcast with a partner on Patreon and that's what I do. It doesn't seem to affect garnering new subscribers. Plus, months from now, someone searching for information on a topic I've commented on will be able to find me who otherwise wouldn't. That person may become a subscriber. But Sailer doesn't do that. So a lot of his writing will be lost to casual readers who might have become subscribers.
    Of course, how he runs his business is none of my business.

    Replies: @anonymous

    Maybe Sailer is having trouble getting paying subscribers because what he writes isn’t worth paying for. His latest substack post on RFK is an example. As commenter Alex DeLarge replied to it, “Steve, this is a lazy, low IQ take that doesn’t deserve to be taken seriously at all.”
    That applies to a lot of what Sailer has been writing recently. His take on the American Navy’s latest submarine was ignorant, arrogant and stupid. He was called out in detail on it by a commenter and a reporter for the Telegraph saw that and did a proper story based not on what Sailer wrote but what the commenter wrote. Sailer should be ashamed of that.
    Sailer also flew off on a tangent ridiculing women who were members of sororities in their college years, so attacking the women mostly likely to be engaged with the wider society and successful in life, women such as Ellen Taaffe Zwilich, Margaret Brewer, Betty Nguyen, Erin Andrews, Phyllis George, Geralyn Lucas and Shonda Shilling, all of whom were the sorority girls that Sailer, for some reason, sneers at. What gain does Sailer derive from doing that? How does that attract paying subscribers?
    Sailer not only seems past his prime, but he doesn’t even seem to be trying any more. Maybe he’s just bored with this gig and is only continuing to do it to get some money, which is understandable. But why a subscriber would pay for it is beyond me.
    He reminds me of Theodore Dalrymple, who once wrote very compelling books and columns but nowadays seems to be phoning it in. His columns are worth nothing more than a glance anymore, if that. Ditto Sailer.

    •�Replies: @Mark G.
    @anonymous

    "His latest Substack post on RFK is an example."

    The support on the right for RFK Jr. isn't puzzling to me. The opposition to him is establishment figures like Fauci. Why would any rightwinger admire Fauci, the man who helped to secretly fund the development of a disease that killed millions and then supported ineffective ways to deal with it like mandatory mass vaccinations, three thousand dollar Remdesivir, mask wearing and lockdowns?

    In addition to RFK Jr., Trump may be bringing Martin Kulldorf into his administration. Kulldorf was one of the signers of the Great Barrington Declaration, which advocated a better method of dealing with the Covid epidemic and which Fauci and his associates tried to discredit. Another past critic of how mainstream medicine deals with diseases, Mehmet Oz, may also be joining the Trump administration. The new Trump administration is also likely to unleash Rand Paul on Fauci.

    Replies: @Anonymous
  291. @Mike Tre
    OT - but late breaking holocaust news as the most notorious Nazi ever to have lived, Ursula Haverbeck, has finally been sent to the 6 millionth level of hell for the worst crime ever of denying the holocaust:

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/ursula-haverbeck-german-far-right-activist-repeatedly-convicted-for-holocaust-denial-dies-at-96/ar-AA1uuJkD

    Jack D and friends: may you sleep a little sounder tonight, knowing that this mortal enemy of yours might no longer be able to sneak into your house and gum you to death (verified method of extermination documented at the Nuremberg thingy - Elie Weasel said he was in charge of holding old ladies' dentures while they gummed countless inmates to death.)

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @Jack D

    At what age should you become immune from criminal prosecution?

    Germany (and most European countries) doesn’t have the equivalent of our 1st Amendment and so they can and do consider Holocaust denial to be a crime under their laws.

    The Germans have their reasons for having such laws. The last time Nazis took power in German, 7 or 8 million Germans died, their major cities were bombed into rubble, their country was divided for almost 50 years, major swaths of territory were lost and Germany’s reputation was permanently marred, so they don’t really want to repeat the exercise. The Jews did not write these laws. If you don’t think that Holocaust denial should be a crime (at at any age) then write to the German legislature and ask them to repeal these laws.

    •�LOL: Adam Smith
    •�Replies: @Joe Stalin
    @Jack D

    https://twitter.com/CollinRugg/status/1855460020357562814
    , @Anonymous
    @Jack D

    Germany has a lot of laws because we imposed them on Germany. Everyone knows that.

    If they wanted to ban ideologies that “cause harm”, they would ban the teaching of communism. Since it was the Soviets who killed the majority of Germans.

    But the insanity is the belief that getting rid of free speech and having an authoritarian state is the way to protect yourself from a fascist leader. Lol.
  292. @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @Ministry Of Tongues

    "There is a world of difference between “We want stories about us” and “All stories must be about us.”"

    A good point; but really, if you want to get down to it, it's actually more like, "All of *your* stories must now be about *us*."

    I don't know if Steve agrees with this, but it would be interesting to see him put his film-critic hat on and do an overview of the latest fad: the Jordan Peele-led "Black! horror movie" craze. My feeling is, none of these movies work as horror, or even *can* work (especially not "Get Out"), because culturally blacks have no horror tradition to build out from, and specifically no tradition of the Gothic or of the uncanny (hell, it's *all* uncanny -- see Amos Tutuole); and no interesting science fiction either, because no actual science in the first place. The subtext of all these movies is --you guess it-- slabery, once again, as if that's really something to be afraid of in this day and age, but what else they got?; and maybe those dopey black-specific superstitions, like being weirdly unusually afraid of snakes (is that even true, or do they just fake it because it's an identity-reinforcement thing?).

    Horror, like comedy, works because it warps the straight line. The problem is that blacks believe so many ridiculously stupid, patently false things, that for them, there is no straight line to begin with.

    Replies: @Anon, @Ministry Of Tongues

    That television series, Lovecraft Country, illustrates your point.

    An Amos Tutuola film directed by Fellini would have been great, though.

  293. @Brutusale
    @The Germ Theory of Disease

    Aston Martin knows its customers.
    https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/Gc2ClspWEAAhHVw.jpg?itok=SNMWFXxQ

    Replies: @Ralph L, @Je Suis Omar Mateen, @Corvinus, @Mr. Anon, @AnotherDad

    Sexy model and pic. But not an actual Aston-Martin ad.

    Is however a reminder of the beauty that is being destroyed by listening to these parasitic loons and their nation destroying ideology.

    •�Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
    @AnotherDad

    "not an actual Aston-Martin ad"

    Pity.
    , @Je Suis Omar Mateen
    @AnotherDad

    "Sexy model and pic. But not an actual Aston-Martin ad."

    Not an actual woman either. And not an actual kitchen. Or actual anything.

    Gawsh, boombooms are imbeciles.
  294. @Reg Cæsar
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms


    While it is impossible to calculate literacy rates in pre-modern Islamic societies, it is almost certain that they were relatively high, at least in comparison to their European counterparts.
    For both sexes? Did any population have close to a majority literate before the 20th century? Generally just boys of a certain class were taught. And those in business, for record-keeping.

    The level of literacy was considerably higher in the Byzantine Empire than in the Latin West.

    No one denies this. (Though where are the data for comparison? Proto-PISA tests?)

    But your claim that no one in the West could read or write is beyond bizarre. Civilization carried on, just without the fanfare of giant, boastful cities. The Bedes were busy scribbling all along.

    The question of Charlemagne’s literacy is debated...
    The question of Mohammed's is not-- he wasn't. This is even held up as evidence for the faith.

    And he started as a businessman, to boot. Who was keeping his tallies? The man at the top doesn't have to be literate himself, he just has to tell those who are what to do. Bill Clinton is said to have sent all of two e-mails in his eight years at 1600. That was a job for staff.

    Replies: @muggles, @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    The question of Mohammed’s is not– he wasn’t. This is even held up as evidence for the faith.

    Likewise, there is no claim that Jesus was literate that I’m aware of. His disciples did the writing, a common thing for major prophets. He was a carpenter by trade.

    Not sure about Moses. He did provide stone tablets, which I suppose he could read. So, God knows Hebrew anyway.

    It is my impression that Buddha spoke to disciples who then reported his words. Not entirely certain if he was literate. I think he was upper class/caste so maybe he was literate.

    Jos. Smith (Mormon) was literate as was L. Ron Hubbard. Very recent.

    Of course, the farther back in time you go, the fewer the literate population.

    Even actual artifact documents by the literate prophet adjacent disciples are few and far between, when they exist at all. Most seem to have gone through a few hands before existing documents can be found today.

    The Chinese seem to have better ancient literate texts, though I don’t know if any are claimed to be originally from major religious prophets.

    •�Replies: @epebble
    @muggles

    there is no claim that Jesus was literate

    Professor Ehrman thinks Jesus could probably read but not write.
    https://ehrmanblog.org/could-jesus-read/
    , @Reg Cæsar
    @muggles


    Likewise, there is no claim that Jesus was literate that I’m aware of.
    John, Ch. 8:

    6 They were using this question as a trap, in order to have a basis for accusing him.

    But Jesus bent down and started to write on the ground with his finger. 7 When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, “Let any one of you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her.” 8 Again he stooped down and wrote on the ground.

    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John%207%3A53-8%3A11&version=NIV

    Note, it's "wrote", not "drew".

    Replies: @muggles
    , @J.Ross
    @muggles

    The basis of the "prophet not recognized in his own country" saying is the famous scene from the gospel in which Jesus reads from and interprets the scrolls, and the congregants disputed his interpretation.
    , @Wokechoke
    @muggles

    If he was a synagogue going adult Jew he would have been assumed literate.


    It’s an interesting question though, why he didn’t to anyone’s knowledge ever write an essay.

    Replies: @Jonathan Mason
    , @Curle
    @muggles


    Jos. Smith (Mormon) was literate
    Was he? He claims he dictated the book to an unidentified scribe when the best available evidence points to Solomon Spaulding and Sidney Rigdon.

    “Those who believe Smith made use of a Spaulding manuscript usually implicate a Baptist-turned-Campbellite preacher named Sidney Rigdon, who officially converted to Smith’s new faith shortly after it was founded in 1830. Several sources indicate that both Spaulding and Rigdon moved to the Pittsburgh area about 1812. Spaulding left a manuscript of a novel known as “Manuscript Found” at a Pittsburgh printer. It subsequently disappeared. The novel reportedly attempted to portray a biblical origin of American Indians. Friends of Rigdon are on record saying he showed them such a novel. And they say that Rigdon had a close friend who worked at the print shop where Spaulding’s novel had been left.”


    https://www.christianitytoday.com/1977/07/who-really-wrote-book-of-mormon/
  295. @muggles
    @Reg Cæsar


    The question of Mohammed’s is not– he wasn’t. This is even held up as evidence for the faith.
    Likewise, there is no claim that Jesus was literate that I'm aware of. His disciples did the writing, a common thing for major prophets. He was a carpenter by trade.

    Not sure about Moses. He did provide stone tablets, which I suppose he could read. So, God knows Hebrew anyway.

    It is my impression that Buddha spoke to disciples who then reported his words. Not entirely certain if he was literate. I think he was upper class/caste so maybe he was literate.

    Jos. Smith (Mormon) was literate as was L. Ron Hubbard. Very recent.

    Of course, the farther back in time you go, the fewer the literate population.

    Even actual artifact documents by the literate prophet adjacent disciples are few and far between, when they exist at all. Most seem to have gone through a few hands before existing documents can be found today.

    The Chinese seem to have better ancient literate texts, though I don't know if any are claimed to be originally from major religious prophets.

    Replies: @epebble, @Reg Cæsar, @J.Ross, @Wokechoke, @Curle

    there is no claim that Jesus was literate

    Professor Ehrman thinks Jesus could probably read but not write.
    https://ehrmanblog.org/could-jesus-read/

  296. @Manfred Arcane
    @AnotherDad

    Vance, interestingly, triggers both the Establishment "conservatives" like John Johnson and the dissident right conspiracy obsessives, like Vox Day and The Conservative Treehouse's Sundance. America's favorite Psycho Ex-Girlfriend, Ann Coulter, also switched from praising him to excorciating him after Catlady-Gate, although she may be back to praising him by now (the lady is a bit unstable). And, of course, the left loathes him for even daring to suggest that old America is worth preserving. For a guy who has so many vocal enemies, he seems remarkably unflappable, and able to keep things from getting under his skin, unlike Trump. Also, while he lacks Trump's towering charisma, he shares his ability to connect effortlessly with normal people, something even good politicians have trouble with; much as I admire DeSantis, he came off as stiff and grumpy in campaign speeches, while Vance has a natural ease. I think Trump has done well in picking a successor.

    Replies: @Joe Stalin

    America’s favorite Psycho Ex-Girlfriend, Ann Coulter, also switched from praising him to excorciating him after Catlady-Gate, although she may be back to praising him by now (the lady is a bit unstable).

    Years ago on WLS-AM radio there was a Don Wade & Roma program where Wade announced Coulter would call in to talk. Never showed, and Wade said something along the line she was never coming on again. Never did before he kicked the bucket.

  297. @Jack D
    @Mike Tre

    At what age should you become immune from criminal prosecution?

    Germany (and most European countries) doesn't have the equivalent of our 1st Amendment and so they can and do consider Holocaust denial to be a crime under their laws.

    The Germans have their reasons for having such laws. The last time Nazis took power in German, 7 or 8 million Germans died, their major cities were bombed into rubble, their country was divided for almost 50 years, major swaths of territory were lost and Germany's reputation was permanently marred, so they don't really want to repeat the exercise. The Jews did not write these laws. If you don't think that Holocaust denial should be a crime (at at any age) then write to the German legislature and ask them to repeal these laws.

    Replies: @Joe Stalin, @Anonymous

  298. @Old Prude
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Silly. Condoleeza Rice could probably make a far more articulate case for starting a war with Russia, than I could for a negotiated peace, but that doesn't make her right.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian

    Because your moral & legal coordinates do not belong to a civilized society.

    •�Replies: @Old Prude
    @Bardon Kaldian

    I didn’t know civilized society preferred pointless war to statecraft. I guess I should have figured that after the last fifty years of America meddling. Thank you for setting me straight.
  299. @J.Ross
    @Bardon Kaldian

    So the sloppy mass murderer Elensky had a pop song written and dedicated to him, and was praised in every regime cheap editorial and political cartoon that nobody reads, but recognizing Putin was a real leader is homosexual? Dude, your side wrote him a song. You shouldn't be throwing that particular stone.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian

    I wrote “mentally sane & normal person”.

    •�Replies: @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Your side hates Russia because it is a big white country that intends to stay that way. And your side especially hates it for being anti-gay/trans.

    Oddly, although I don't think Sailer and Cochran are queer, they both seem to have the same antipathy toward healthy heterosexual male assertiveness that queers do.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  300. @Mike Tre
    @Nicholas Stix

    Thanks.

    I suppose we can all be forgiven for forgetting that Washington's casting in GII isn't the first time he's been gratuitously inserted into a European period piece:

    https://cps-static.rovicorp.com/1/avg/cov584/drv400/v493/v49386fvbri.jpg

    Replies: @Mr. Anon

    Shakespeare is drama, not history. It is typically held to a different standard of realism. If a black actor is cast as Julius Caesar or Macbeth in those plays, I don’t mind, as long as he turns in a good performance.

    •�Replies: @Steve Sailer
    @Mr. Anon

    And plays are often put on by small acting troupes, such as Steppenwolf in Chicago in the 1970s. So, if one founding member is black and another is Chinese, they need roles in whatever play they decide to put on: Chekov or whatever. They can't afford to go out and audition a whole bunch of Russian-looking actors. They go to war with the army they've got.

    I'm in favor making it easier rather than harder for young people to put on a show.

    Replies: @Mike Tre, @Colin Wright, @muggles, @Jack D
    , @Mike Tre
    @Mr. Anon

    Bullshit. Shakespeare is historical, and negrofying his work is an absolutely a rewrite of history. You're Ok with the current negrofication Nordic mythology and Tolkien's works?

    Replies: @Mr. Anon
    , @Curle
    @Mr. Anon


    If a black actor is cast as Julius Caesar or Macbeth in those plays, I don’t mind
    I’ve seen that too and by the end of the play the initial irritation at having to use extra imagination disappears as long as the actors don’t change sex and they don’t adopt some patois speech pattern. When it comes to women playing major male characters the play is ruined. I saw a version of The Tempest where they made Prospero a woman and it was a discretionary decision not one arrived at by necessity. Ruined the play for me and made me wonder at the tolerance of early play goers who watched men in female roles. I realize it was a convention they expected and that Twelfth Night makes it part of the play, still . . .
  301. @Odyssey
    @Mike Tre

    So, lohohohol, who were Emperor Justinian, his uncle Emperor Justin and his general Belisarius?

    Replies: @Mike Tre

  302. @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @Moshe Def

    So... a people who couldn't figure out how to overcome a crocodile were somehow nevertheless going to become the masters of the Mediterranean and Europe.

    Okay.

    Replies: @Mike Tre
  303. @BB753
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    Eastern Europe is different. They do claim Byzantium. And they do not have hang-ups about "swarthy" Greeks. For cultural, political and religious reasons, Western Europeans look down on Byzantium. There was plenty of bad blood between Constantinople and the West, and not only because of the Crusades.

    Replies: @anon, @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    Yeah bro obviously, the West allied with Mohammedans against Constantinople, even romanticized the episode.

    Harun al-Rashid receiving a delegation of Charlemagne in Baghdad

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abbasid–Carolingian_alliance

  304. @Reg Cæsar
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms


    While it is impossible to calculate literacy rates in pre-modern Islamic societies, it is almost certain that they were relatively high, at least in comparison to their European counterparts.
    For both sexes? Did any population have close to a majority literate before the 20th century? Generally just boys of a certain class were taught. And those in business, for record-keeping.

    The level of literacy was considerably higher in the Byzantine Empire than in the Latin West.

    No one denies this. (Though where are the data for comparison? Proto-PISA tests?)

    But your claim that no one in the West could read or write is beyond bizarre. Civilization carried on, just without the fanfare of giant, boastful cities. The Bedes were busy scribbling all along.

    The question of Charlemagne’s literacy is debated...
    The question of Mohammed's is not-- he wasn't. This is even held up as evidence for the faith.

    And he started as a businessman, to boot. Who was keeping his tallies? The man at the top doesn't have to be literate himself, he just has to tell those who are what to do. Bill Clinton is said to have sent all of two e-mails in his eight years at 1600. That was a job for staff.

    Replies: @muggles, @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    Charlemagne should be compared with the founding Abbasid Caliph– al-Manṣūr (714 to 775), who undertook this effort:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graeco-Arabic_translation_movement

    Though where are the data for comparison?

    The Muslims had papermaking for three centuries earlier, and transmitted it to Europe.

    Early Middle Ages was 5 to 10th CE, how much venacular literature did the West produce in this period? Much less in Latin and Greek. Beowulf is dated to 975.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval_literature

    You missed this gem?

    •�Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms


    Charlemagne should be compared with the founding Abbasid Caliph– al-Manṣūr
    This is just quibbling over populations with perhaps 5% literacy vs 10%. How many could read in Persia? China? The Subcontinent? Japan?

    The Muslims had papermaking for three centuries earlier...
    Which they got from China, the way they got their math from India. Much of the credit for their "golden age" belongs to ethnic and religious minorities under their rule.
    , @songbird
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms


    The Muslims had papermaking for three centuries earlier, and transmitted it to Europe
    Yellow River Valley wins again!

    But wasn't it the Muslims preventing commerce with China?

    Replies: @Roger-Lodge
  305. @anonymous
    @anonymous

    Maybe Sailer is having trouble getting paying subscribers because what he writes isn't worth paying for. His latest substack post on RFK is an example. As commenter Alex DeLarge replied to it, "Steve, this is a lazy, low IQ take that doesn't deserve to be taken seriously at all."
    That applies to a lot of what Sailer has been writing recently. His take on the American Navy's latest submarine was ignorant, arrogant and stupid. He was called out in detail on it by a commenter and a reporter for the Telegraph saw that and did a proper story based not on what Sailer wrote but what the commenter wrote. Sailer should be ashamed of that.
    Sailer also flew off on a tangent ridiculing women who were members of sororities in their college years, so attacking the women mostly likely to be engaged with the wider society and successful in life, women such as Ellen Taaffe Zwilich, Margaret Brewer, Betty Nguyen, Erin Andrews, Phyllis George, Geralyn Lucas and Shonda Shilling, all of whom were the sorority girls that Sailer, for some reason, sneers at. What gain does Sailer derive from doing that? How does that attract paying subscribers?
    Sailer not only seems past his prime, but he doesn't even seem to be trying any more. Maybe he's just bored with this gig and is only continuing to do it to get some money, which is understandable. But why a subscriber would pay for it is beyond me.
    He reminds me of Theodore Dalrymple, who once wrote very compelling books and columns but nowadays seems to be phoning it in. His columns are worth nothing more than a glance anymore, if that. Ditto Sailer.

    Replies: @Mark G.

    “His latest Substack post on RFK is an example.”

    The support on the right for RFK Jr. isn’t puzzling to me. The opposition to him is establishment figures like Fauci. Why would any rightwinger admire Fauci, the man who helped to secretly fund the development of a disease that killed millions and then supported ineffective ways to deal with it like mandatory mass vaccinations, three thousand dollar Remdesivir, mask wearing and lockdowns?

    In addition to RFK Jr., Trump may be bringing Martin Kulldorf into his administration. Kulldorf was one of the signers of the Great Barrington Declaration, which advocated a better method of dealing with the Covid epidemic and which Fauci and his associates tried to discredit. Another past critic of how mainstream medicine deals with diseases, Mehmet Oz, may also be joining the Trump administration. The new Trump administration is also likely to unleash Rand Paul on Fauci.

    •�Replies: @Anonymous
    @Mark G.

    Seeing as Trump was in fact elected, the alternative to him picking RFK is not Fauci. The alternative is picking someone else: for instance, someone who understands science and the research/funding process. Not a lawyer whose specialty is BS.

    Replies: @Mr. Anon
  306. @muggles
    @Reg Cæsar


    The question of Mohammed’s is not– he wasn’t. This is even held up as evidence for the faith.
    Likewise, there is no claim that Jesus was literate that I'm aware of. His disciples did the writing, a common thing for major prophets. He was a carpenter by trade.

    Not sure about Moses. He did provide stone tablets, which I suppose he could read. So, God knows Hebrew anyway.

    It is my impression that Buddha spoke to disciples who then reported his words. Not entirely certain if he was literate. I think he was upper class/caste so maybe he was literate.

    Jos. Smith (Mormon) was literate as was L. Ron Hubbard. Very recent.

    Of course, the farther back in time you go, the fewer the literate population.

    Even actual artifact documents by the literate prophet adjacent disciples are few and far between, when they exist at all. Most seem to have gone through a few hands before existing documents can be found today.

    The Chinese seem to have better ancient literate texts, though I don't know if any are claimed to be originally from major religious prophets.

    Replies: @epebble, @Reg Cæsar, @J.Ross, @Wokechoke, @Curle

    Likewise, there is no claim that Jesus was literate that I’m aware of.

    John, Ch. 8:

    6 They were using this question as a trap, in order to have a basis for accusing him.

    But Jesus bent down and started to write on the ground with his finger. 7 When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, “Let any one of you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her.” 8 Again he stooped down and wrote on the ground.

    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John%207%3A53-8%3A11&version=NIV

    Note, it’s “wrote”, not “drew”.

    •�Replies: @muggles
    @Reg Cæsar

    Okay, that and perhaps other biblical bits may suggest that Jesus was literate.

    Yet very odd. I am unaware of any of his disciples referencing them or referring to texts.

    Obviously "disciple commentary" which was cobbled together from various older sources here and there is not necessarily conclusive.

    In general, religious prophets of major religions until fairly modern times were not known by their alleged direct writings.

    Even the indirect reported commentary is not often very reliably sourced.

    Since very few people could read, it didn't seem important to spend time writing things down on expensive materials which even then were quite perishable.

    Very few if any original ancient Roman or Greek scrolls or writing other than carved stone, exist.

    I don't believe Mohammad is credited with any directly written texts. Though some may be said to have been dictated or recited.

    Today we are flooded with various means of preserving writing, speech, visual information, sounds and song, and many easy access formats.

    The world until about 1500 was known though song and tales told often.

    Some major civilizations had no written languages: ancient Carthage and the Khan Mongols. Most of Africa, the Americas and island Pacific region had no written languages, a few sparse records at most.

    It may help religions to survive over time by being mysterious and reflective in the origins of many of their precepts. Modern religious prophets seem to wear out their appeal pretty quickly.

    Too much detail can subtract: "shoes must be worn all day Sunday", or "turnips are among the holy plants which should be in your gardens."

    Fortunately, Jesus's admonition that "Men shall not wear pony tales or man buns" was lost in the mists of time. So, we get to call that one for ourselves.
  307. @Steve Sailer
    @Odyssey

    The late Classical age was dominated by hard men from the Balkans.

    Replies: @Odyssey, @Buzz Mohawk

    As the girls in Boulder used to say, “a hard man is good to find.”

  308. @muggles
    @Reg Cæsar


    The question of Mohammed’s is not– he wasn’t. This is even held up as evidence for the faith.
    Likewise, there is no claim that Jesus was literate that I'm aware of. His disciples did the writing, a common thing for major prophets. He was a carpenter by trade.

    Not sure about Moses. He did provide stone tablets, which I suppose he could read. So, God knows Hebrew anyway.

    It is my impression that Buddha spoke to disciples who then reported his words. Not entirely certain if he was literate. I think he was upper class/caste so maybe he was literate.

    Jos. Smith (Mormon) was literate as was L. Ron Hubbard. Very recent.

    Of course, the farther back in time you go, the fewer the literate population.

    Even actual artifact documents by the literate prophet adjacent disciples are few and far between, when they exist at all. Most seem to have gone through a few hands before existing documents can be found today.

    The Chinese seem to have better ancient literate texts, though I don't know if any are claimed to be originally from major religious prophets.

    Replies: @epebble, @Reg Cæsar, @J.Ross, @Wokechoke, @Curle

    The basis of the “prophet not recognized in his own country” saying is the famous scene from the gospel in which Jesus reads from and interprets the scrolls, and the congregants disputed his interpretation.

  309. @Mike Tre
    @Almost Missouri

    Denzel Washington is a very mediocre actor; the extent of his range pretty much being how far the blackity-black dial gets turned up or down. Otherwise he's the same guy in every film, and so many movies would have been better all around had a white lead been in his place (think Bruce Willis leading in Man on Fire, for example.)

    Replies: @Twinkie, @Truth

    Otherwise he’s the same guy in every film,

    So where Clint Eastwood, John Wayne, and Ahh-Nold.

    “(think Bruce Willis leading in Man on Fire, for example.”

    Now there’s a thespian who makes me think “MacBeth at the Royal Shakespeare Teatre.”

  310. @Mr. Anon
    @AnotherDad

    As you note, Vance is articulate - which Trump is not. Vance is also smart - which Trump is not. At least he seldom gives much evidence for it.

    But Vance may very well also be a rather slippery character. Vance owes his business and political career to the patronage of the gay German billionaire, Peter Thiel. You want to talk minoritarianism - that's three minority groups right there. As billionaire oligarchs go, Thiel is probably not the worst. But he is a billionaire oligarch and I don't trust him, nor do I necessarily trust one of his creations.

    We'll see what they do.

    One thing the incoming Trump administration should do is start doing something tangible for the people who put them in office. Back in 2017, Steve Bannon wanted to enact a large-scale federal infrastructure project that would put money into the hands of blue collar workers, especially in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. Presumably in some reliably Red states as well. That was scotched by Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell and the rest of the Republican establishment (way to go, guys).

    There are a lot of things that need fixing in America. The Trump administration should try to fix some of them. If they don't, then Vance or whoever runs to succeed Trump in 2028 will have nobody but themselves to blame.

    Replies: @AnotherDad, @Truth, @Curle

    As you note, Vance is articulate – which Trump is not. Vance is also smart – which Trump is not. At least he seldom gives much evidence for it.

    Let me make it simple for you, Caine: Any complete nobody who gets major publishing house offers to write an “autobiography” is your enemy. Think, Barry.

    •�Replies: @Mr. Anon
    @Truth

    I have no idea who this "Caine" fellow you keep addressing is. It certainly isn't me.

    So try to leave me out of your internal monologue with the voices in your head.

    That said, your point isn't a bad one. It almost seems as if Vance was being groomed for high office, hence the autobiography, including film deal. I wonder if maybe Hollywood thought he would be a Democrat.
  311. @AnotherDad
    @Brutusale

    Sexy model and pic. But not an actual Aston-Martin ad.

    Is however a reminder of the beauty that is being destroyed by listening to these parasitic loons and their nation destroying ideology.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @Je Suis Omar Mateen

    “not an actual Aston-Martin ad”

    Pity.

    •�Agree: Jim Don Bob
  312. @YetAnotherAnon
    @Mike Tre

    I've noticed that "news" providers nowadays have to add little indicator words - apparently she was "notorious".

    It must be said she was a very brave woman, denying the secular equivalent of Christ's divinity. And it must be said that she was "only" imprisoned, when a few hundred years back a blasphemer like her might have been killed.

    I do wonder if the brutal treatment of civilian Germans, first by RAF Bomber Command, then by the Red Army, then by the post-war occupation and starvation, hasn't burned something into the collective German soul.

    Reading about the occupation of Japan, the Japanese behaved very differently. Japanese officials continued to run things, MacArthur was given parades worthy of a Caesar to keep him sweet, and the Japanese were told under all circumstances to co-operate, even when GIs were arresting women on Kyoto streets or in their homes, and examining their genitalia "for signs of venereal disease".

    The Japanese have an expression that means "to obey with the face, but to disobey with the gut".

    Replies: @Jack D, @Wokechoke

    I do wonder if the brutal treatment of civilian Germans, first by RAF Bomber Command, then by the Red Army, then by the post-war occupation and starvation, hasn’t burned something into the collective German soul.

    Yes, it did. It burned into 99% of them never to follow a mad fascist dictator making promises of German glory into ruin again. From now on stick to making high quality export goods and leave the global adventures to the Americans. Why invade Britain or Poland if you can just sell them BMW’s and Mercedes and make good $?

    1% of them were die hard Hitler followers and didn’t draw the right lesson.

    •�Replies: @mc23
    @Jack D

    Nazi Germany should be exhibit number one on the effectiveness of propaganda and social conditioning.
    , @Colin Wright
    @Jack D


    '...1% of them were die hard Hitler followers and didn’t draw the right lesson.'
    It would have been considerably more than 1% -- to say the least.

    Now, the moral to be drawn from that would be a fruitful topic for debate.
    , @YetAnotherAnon
    @Jack D

    I wonder if similar brutal treatment will produce similar results in Palestine?

    (Not that I think the underlying German psyche is that different - it's just a different bunch telling them what to do and who to hate)
    , @James B. Shearer
    @Jack D

    "Yes, it did. It burned into 99% of them never to follow a mad fascist dictator making promises of German glory into ruin again. ..."

    If it was really 99% they wouldn't need Holocaust denial laws.

    Replies: @Jack D
  313. In Race and Atlanta news:

    Atlanta Woman Sentenced To Life For Burning Sons In Oven and sent the video to the dad

    https://citizenwatchreport.com/atlanta-woman-sentenced-to-life-for-burning-sons-in-oven-and-sent-the-video-to-the-dad/

  314. anon[364] •�Disclaimer says:
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    The Roman emperors looked like this.

    https://www.worldhistory.org/uploads/images/12993.jpg

    Caracalla in the film look closer to Denzel Washington than the actor who played him

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/33/Sundance_Film_Festival_2024_-_Fred_Hechinger-104A1882_%28cropped%29.jpg

    The original Gladiator began with the Romans fighting the Germanic barbarians, the ancestors to most white Americans.

    He says to Russell Crowe: Ihr seid verfluchte hunde! "You are cursed dogs!" White Americans should be proud of their ancestors who resisted Roman conquest.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fuUnd9Db6Hg

    In actuality, the Roman Empire survived for another 284 years.
    That's completely false. Roman Empire survived for another 1261 years after Commodus.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Empire

    But you deliberate obfuscate that because the modern lands of the Eastern empire are full of brown people that you want keep out of Europe right?

    Replies: @BB753, @Peter Akuleyev, @Dmon, @Wokechoke, @Dutch Boy, @anon, @Odyssey, @anon

    The Roman emperors looked like this.

    The best way to know how the Roman emperors looked it just to look at Ashkenazi Jews.

    Ashkeanzi Jews have intermarried and interbred with the Roman elite, they didn’t get their high intelligence from interbreeding with Italian peasants.

    Here we show that all four major founders, ~40% of Ashkenazi mtDNA variation, have ancestry in prehistoric Europe, rather than the Near East or Caucasus. Furthermore, most of the remaining minor founders share a similar deep European ancestry. Thus the great majority of Ashkenazi maternal lineages were not brought from the Levant, as commonly supposed, nor recruited in the Caucasus, as sometimes suggested, but assimilated within Europe.

    Overall, we estimate that most (>80%) Ashkenazi mtDNAs were assimilated within Europe. Few derive from a Near Eastern source, and despite the recent revival of the ‘Khazar hypothesis’, virtually none are likely to have ancestry in the North Caucasus.

    Given the strength of the case for even these founders having a European source, however, our best estimate is to assign ~81% of Ashkenazi lineages to a European source, ~8% to the Near East and ~1% further to the east in Asia, with ~10% remaining ambiguous.

    Thus at least two-thirds and most likely more than four-fifths of Ashkenazi maternal lineages have a European ancestry.

    Our results, primarily from the detailed analysis of the four major haplogroup K and N1b founders, but corroborated with the remaining Ashkenazi mtDNAs, suggest that most Ashkenazi maternal lineages trace their ancestry to prehistoric Europe.

    Overall, it seems that at least 80% of Ashkenazi maternal ancestry is due to the assimilation of mtDNAs indigenous to Europe, most likely through conversion. The phylogenetic nesting patterns suggest that the most frequent of the Ashkenazi mtDNA lineages were assimilated in Western Europe, ~2 ka or slightly earlier. Some in particular, including N1b2, M1a1b, K1a9 and perhaps even the major K1a1b1, point to a north Mediterranean source. It seems likely that the major founders were the result of the earliest and presumably most profound wave of founder effects, from the Mediterranean northwards into central Europe, and that most of the minor founders were assimilated in west/central Europe within the last 1,500 years.

    Despite widely differing interpretations of autosomal data, these results in fact fit well with genome-wide studies, which imply a significant European component, with particularly close relationships to Italians.

    These analyses suggest that the first major wave of assimilation probably took place in Mediterranean Europe, most likely in the Italian peninsula ~2 ka, with substantial further assimilation of minor founders in west/central Europe.

    There is surprisingly little evidence for any significant founder event from the Near East. Fewer than 10% of the Ashkenazi mtDNAs can be assigned to a Near Eastern source with any confidence, and these are found at very low frequencies. it seems likely that other more minor Near Eastern lineages are the result of more recent gene flow into the Ashkenazim.

    Others such as U1a and U1b have an ultimately Near Eastern origin but, like N1b, have been subsequently distributed around the north Mediterranean.

    In general, it is more difficult to assign lineages to a Near Eastern source with confidence, as the much larger control-region database indicates that (as with N1b2) many lineages with deep Near Eastern ancestry became widely dispersed along the north Mediterranean during the Holocene, and may alternatively have been assimilated there.

    https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms3543

  315. @anon
    @RedPill Boomer

    Some of them maybe, but is this not a myth though? 6 million Jews were living in the Roman Empire, but outside Israel, mainly in Italy and Southern Europe. In contrast, only about 500,000 lived in Judea. The Jews also intermarried with the Roman elite and their God Yaweh conquered Roman paganism. During Greco-Roman times, recorded mass conversions led to 6 million people practicing Judaism in Roman times or up to 10% of the population of the Roman Empire.

    Replies: @mc23

    Few people realize that the vast majority of Israeli Jews probably derive from people, perhaps Phoenicians from southern Lebanon, who lived outside of Judea before the birth of Jesus of Nazareth and that after the destruction of the second temple Christianized Jews may have ended up been the majority of Jews in Palestine. They certainly were the majority a hundred years before Constantine became emperor.

  316. @Jack D
    @YetAnotherAnon


    I do wonder if the brutal treatment of civilian Germans, first by RAF Bomber Command, then by the Red Army, then by the post-war occupation and starvation, hasn’t burned something into the collective German soul.
    Yes, it did. It burned into 99% of them never to follow a mad fascist dictator making promises of German glory into ruin again. From now on stick to making high quality export goods and leave the global adventures to the Americans. Why invade Britain or Poland if you can just sell them BMW's and Mercedes and make good $?

    1% of them were die hard Hitler followers and didn't draw the right lesson.

    Replies: @mc23, @Colin Wright, @YetAnotherAnon, @James B. Shearer

    Nazi Germany should be exhibit number one on the effectiveness of propaganda and social conditioning.

  317. @Jack D
    @Anon

    That's ridiculous. The blacks who are into the Hotep/We Wuz Kangs stuff are also the blacks who are the most anti-Semitic and the ones who are most detached from mainstream and academic media sources.

    Getting rid of Joos is not the all purpose solution to all of America's ills that the Men of Unz seem to think it is. You will still have your blacks (which BTW YOU and not the Jews brought here) and they will be just as troublesome as they have been for the last 400 years.

    If blacks are less troublesome in other countries it is because WASPs were always wooly headed and had a soft spot in their bleeding hearts for them and for every other type of loser. Was there ever any equivalent of the New England abolitionist movement in Brazil?

    Replies: @Mark G., @AnotherDad, @Curle, @newrouter

    “WASPs were always wooly headed”

    Everyone else always picks on us poor old WASPs. Brazil abolished slavery too, so they also had an abolitionist movement. Very few people now would think slavery is a good thing so Britain ending the slave trade and the New England abolitionists here working to end the practice in this country did the right thing.

    Blacks will always be a problem. That problem, though, has been exacerbated over the last sixty years by welfare programs, affirmative action, and soft on crime policies advocated by liberals. While the majority of liberals are not Jews, the majority of Jews are liberal. Even a pro-Israel conservative like Trump only got about thirty percent of the Jewish vote. So, while I would not blame Jews for all the ills of society, they may do more harm than good as a group.

  318. Related: Musk’s recent comment:

    Instead of teaching fear of pregnancy, we should teach fear of childlessness.

    was great to see, a definite push in the right direction. Musk, of course, is wise enough to stay away from anything wading into racial territory, but he’s fairly upfront on the eugenic–need more smart people breeding–angle. Which, of course, he has been vigorously doing himself. (Musk actually acts like you’d expect a swashbuckling billionaire to act. “It’s good to be the king.”)

    My critique of Trump–beyond the general stuff about his personality, intellectual effort, discipline and effectiveness–centers on his failure to really directly tie immigration to the destruction of “affordable family formation” and the “American Dream” for young Americans. If he’d done this clearly and effectively, he would have really broken through with young people and we’d be living with a whole new political paradigm. But Trump–“it’s going to be great”–is Trump. We are going to have to wait for some post-Trump nationalist with clearer thinking to push forward.

    But it’s great to see someone with visibility like Musk driving the critical demographic issues back into the public realm. We’ve had 60 years of anti-empirical, anti-biological nonsense and lies from, well, the usual suspects. Finally, we’re seeing someone with high public profile pushing biological reality back into view.

    •�Replies: @Mr. Anon
    @AnotherDad


    My critique of Trump–beyond the general stuff about his personality, intellectual effort, discipline and effectiveness–centers on his failure to really directly tie immigration to the destruction of “affordable family formation” and the “American Dream” for young Americans.
    That would also be a way of highlighting the fact that isn't just illegal immigration that is a problem. It is legal immigration that also needs to be curtailed.
  319. @EFG
    Should Denzel Washington have played the bad guy in Gladiator II?

    Eh, I'm not sure.

    First of all, I haven't seen the movie. So, is Denzel playing something like the Emperor of Rome? Or a slave gladiator?

    The first role seem very dubious.

    The second seems plausible, if unlikely/unusual.

    Replies: @Jonathan Mason, @Corpse Tooth, @MarcusInTier

    Ancient Rome had very light contact with Ethiopia, that’s the only “black” nation they had any contact with. The majority of Ethiopians are roughly 50% Caucasian according to DNA tests. They have black skin but have Caucasian features. Most black Americans are from Bantu stock [West Africa, south of the Sahara] and they had no contact with Rome, they also look very different from Ethiopians.

    There are Bantus in parts of Ethiopia today but they are rather recent arrivals, from the 500s AD up until today.

    Ethiopian woman and man, who are not Bantu:

    Bantu woman and man:

    Denzel Washington obviously has a large amount of White / Caucasian admixture himself. He has hndsome Caucasian features, especially his cheek bones and general eye shape. If he were cast to play the part of a Ethiopian during Roman times, he could pass as it. A wide nosed Bantu with typical Bantu features playing the part – NO.

  320. @YetAnotherAnon
    @Mike Tre

    I've noticed that "news" providers nowadays have to add little indicator words - apparently she was "notorious".

    It must be said she was a very brave woman, denying the secular equivalent of Christ's divinity. And it must be said that she was "only" imprisoned, when a few hundred years back a blasphemer like her might have been killed.

    I do wonder if the brutal treatment of civilian Germans, first by RAF Bomber Command, then by the Red Army, then by the post-war occupation and starvation, hasn't burned something into the collective German soul.

    Reading about the occupation of Japan, the Japanese behaved very differently. Japanese officials continued to run things, MacArthur was given parades worthy of a Caesar to keep him sweet, and the Japanese were told under all circumstances to co-operate, even when GIs were arresting women on Kyoto streets or in their homes, and examining their genitalia "for signs of venereal disease".

    The Japanese have an expression that means "to obey with the face, but to disobey with the gut".

    Replies: @Jack D, @Wokechoke

    The Blitz did burn something into the English. Which they metered out 10 fold back.

    •�Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
    @Wokechoke

    To be fair, we Brits started the bombing of Germany before they started bombing us. It was on a relatively light scale, because we only had light bombers like Hampdens with small bomb loads.

    But ... Germany had already bombed central Rotterdam pretty flat, on May 13 1940, before the RAF started bombing German cities. (The picture is after they'd cleared the rubble and probably pulled down seriously damaged buildings).

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/61/Rotterdam%2C_Laurenskerk%2C_na_bombardement_van_mei_1940.jpg

    Replies: @Older Palo Altan
  321. @muggles
    @Reg Cæsar


    The question of Mohammed’s is not– he wasn’t. This is even held up as evidence for the faith.
    Likewise, there is no claim that Jesus was literate that I'm aware of. His disciples did the writing, a common thing for major prophets. He was a carpenter by trade.

    Not sure about Moses. He did provide stone tablets, which I suppose he could read. So, God knows Hebrew anyway.

    It is my impression that Buddha spoke to disciples who then reported his words. Not entirely certain if he was literate. I think he was upper class/caste so maybe he was literate.

    Jos. Smith (Mormon) was literate as was L. Ron Hubbard. Very recent.

    Of course, the farther back in time you go, the fewer the literate population.

    Even actual artifact documents by the literate prophet adjacent disciples are few and far between, when they exist at all. Most seem to have gone through a few hands before existing documents can be found today.

    The Chinese seem to have better ancient literate texts, though I don't know if any are claimed to be originally from major religious prophets.

    Replies: @epebble, @Reg Cæsar, @J.Ross, @Wokechoke, @Curle

    If he was a synagogue going adult Jew he would have been assumed literate.

    It’s an interesting question though, why he didn’t to anyone’s knowledge ever write an essay.

    •�Replies: @Jonathan Mason
    @Wokechoke

    He seemed to have a thing about the scribes and the Pharisees. Presumably if you wanted to write an essay you would hire a scribe.

    To this day, I believe that in India they still have scribes, so that if you need someone to write a letter for you or something, they will do it.

    If that is no longer the case then it was certainly the case during my lifetime.

    Of course with artificial intelligence, you can just ask it to write a letter or a resume for you, or even ask for a calculation of how long a certain battery will run your TV, so very likely we will eventually revert to the times when only a few people can read and write.

    Replies: @Wokechoke
  322. WDCB.org’s Juke Box Saturday Night for today features Vol. 9 of Glenn Miller’s 1939 band, if anyone is interested.

    Also, Thanksgiving radio Americana on Those Were the Days this week.

    SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 23
    ANNUAL THANKSGIVING SHOW

    WE THE PEOPLE (11-23-48) Dale Carnegie hosts this Thanksgiving week broadcast, with guests Lili Palmer, author Betty MacDonald, singer Burl Ives, the St. Thomas Church Choir, Oscar Bradley and the Orchestra, announcers Dwight Weist and Dan Seymour. Gulf Oil, CBS. (28 min)
    CINNAMON BEAR (1937) Chapter 8. Riding with Captain Taffy and the Candy Pirates. (13 min)
    OUR MISS BROOKS (11-19-50) Eve Arden stars as Connie Brooks, with Gale Gordon as Mr. Conklin, Jeff Chandler as Mr. Boynton, Richard Crenna as Walter Denton, Jane Morgan, Gloria McMillan. Miss Brooks offers to buy a turkey for the Conklin family’s Thanksgiving dinner. Colgate-Palmolive, CBS. (29 min)
    CINNAMON BEAR (1937) Chapter 9. The Roly Poly Policeman. (13 min)
    CINNAMON BEAR (1937) Chapter 10. Professor Whiz the Owl and Fraidy Cat the kitten. (13 min)
    CASEY, CRIME PHOTOGRAPHER (11-27-47) “After Turkey, The Bill” stars Staats Cotsworth as Casey, with Jan Miner as Anne Williams, John Gibson as Ethelbert. On Thanksgiving, a young ex-con is accused of a gas station robbery. Tony Marvin announces. Anchor Hocking Glass, CBS. (30 min)
    CINNAMON BEAR (1937) Chapter 11. Fee Fo, the Friendly Giant. (13 min)
    THANKSGIVING SPECIAL (11-23-44) Lionel Barrymore hosts this special program for the Armed Forces, with performances by Dinah Shore, John Charles Thomas, Harry von Zell, Wally Brown, Frank Morgan, Fanny Brice and Hanley Stafford as Baby Snooks and Daddy, Percy Faith and the Orchestra. Daddy dreams that he’s a turkey; Dinah sings “I’ve Got Plenty to Be Thankful For.” AFRS. (29 min)

    Availible on their two-week archive.

    •�Thanks: kaganovitch
  323. @Mark G.
    @anonymous

    "His latest Substack post on RFK is an example."

    The support on the right for RFK Jr. isn't puzzling to me. The opposition to him is establishment figures like Fauci. Why would any rightwinger admire Fauci, the man who helped to secretly fund the development of a disease that killed millions and then supported ineffective ways to deal with it like mandatory mass vaccinations, three thousand dollar Remdesivir, mask wearing and lockdowns?

    In addition to RFK Jr., Trump may be bringing Martin Kulldorf into his administration. Kulldorf was one of the signers of the Great Barrington Declaration, which advocated a better method of dealing with the Covid epidemic and which Fauci and his associates tried to discredit. Another past critic of how mainstream medicine deals with diseases, Mehmet Oz, may also be joining the Trump administration. The new Trump administration is also likely to unleash Rand Paul on Fauci.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    Seeing as Trump was in fact elected, the alternative to him picking RFK is not Fauci. The alternative is picking someone else: for instance, someone who understands science and the research/funding process. Not a lawyer whose specialty is BS.

    •�Replies: @Mr. Anon
    @Anonymous


    Seeing as Trump was in fact elected, the alternative to him picking RFK is not Fauci. The alternative is picking someone else: for instance, someone who understands science and the research/funding process. Not a lawyer whose specialty is BS.
    Why is that a problem? How many Secretaries of Energy could formally define what "energy" is. How many Secretaries of Agriculture have evern farmed?

    The NIAID research/funding process as run by Anthony Fauci for nearly forty years (RFK Jr. referred to him as the J. Edgar Hoover of Public Health) in which Fauci's toadies and cronies get funding as long as they toe his line and stroke his ego and dissenting voices are crushed is part of the problem. Fauci funded GoF research both in the US and abroad, the endpoint of which is creating pathogens that are more deadly even than those found in nature. That may very well have been the origin of COVID-19.
  324. @Mr. Anon
    @Mike Tre

    Shakespeare is drama, not history. It is typically held to a different standard of realism. If a black actor is cast as Julius Caesar or Macbeth in those plays, I don't mind, as long as he turns in a good performance.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Mike Tre, @Curle

    And plays are often put on by small acting troupes, such as Steppenwolf in Chicago in the 1970s. So, if one founding member is black and another is Chinese, they need roles in whatever play they decide to put on: Chekov or whatever. They can’t afford to go out and audition a whole bunch of Russian-looking actors. They go to war with the army they’ve got.

    I’m in favor making it easier rather than harder for young people to put on a show.

    •�Replies: @Mike Tre
    @Steve Sailer

    You're making a completely different point. Nobody was talking about small local stage productions. A major Hollywood film with a 7 or 8 figure budget can cast historically appropriate actors. Washington's casting was pure diversity engineering bullshit and you're being as obtuse as ever.
    , @Colin Wright
    @Steve Sailer


    'And plays are often put on by small acting troupes, such as Steppenwolf in Chicago in the 1970s. So, if one founding member is black and another is Chinese, they need roles in whatever play they decide to put on: Chekov or whatever. They can’t afford to go out and audition a whole bunch of Russian-looking actors. They go to war with the army they’ve got...'
    Sure -- as far as that goes. But that's not what is raising so many hackles.

    Forgive me for being crude, but the metaphor that comes to mind is if I piddle on your property. Well, if it's the parking lot of your wholesale plumbing supply store, and it's Sunday, and everything is closed, maybe I just had to take a leak. Applause isn't called for, but perhaps the outrage could be skipped.

    Now, if I come up onto the front porch of your house and cut loose, that's a different matter. Perhaps expediency wasn't my sole motive.
    , @muggles
    @Steve Sailer


    I'm in favor making it easier rather than harder for young people to put on a show.
    As I understand it (though old information) it is expensive to get legal rights to perform many plays which are still under copyright or intellectual ownership.

    High school productions, and college, may get some breaks but costs are (or were) based on theater size, # performances, etc.

    Also, additional costs if music is involved.

    This is assuming they are nonunion. Add in stages, props and theater rentals, you have a financial hurdle. Most local companies and some larger national ones are "nonprofits" and raise outside funds.
    , @Jack D
    @Steve Sailer

    Remember that in the original Shakespeare productions, all the female roles were performed by dudes. That's a lot worse than having a black guy play Macbeth.

    While characters like Macbeth and Hamlet are quasi-historical, they really portray universal concepts. When Hamlet asks, "To be or not to be?" he is not really speaking as a Dane but as a human and any human can ask that existential question. It is for this very reason that we still perform Shakespeare 400 years later when most other works of that time are so rooted in their time and place that they mean nothing to our lives today and can only be viewed as antique curiosities.

    What I do object to is putting blacks into recognizable and contemporary roles where they clearly do not belong. It's one thing to cast a black dude as Hamlet but another to cast one as Winston Churchill. No one has done that yet but the other day I saw a preview for an upcoming movie called Blitz.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iZwykQK9aZo

    The movie is about the German bombing of London and about all the children who were evacuated to the British countryside and separated from their parents. Naturally, this being 2024, the main child character (who is a stand in for all of the British children who were affected by the Blitz) is played by a (half) black child with a white mother. How many (half) black children were there in London in 1940?

    The only true aspect to this is that as far as I can tell, there is no black father in the picture - has there ever been a black man who stuck around to raise his children with a white woman? I have literally never met one. You would think that white women would get the message, or maybe they CHOOSE black men because they don't really want to be tied down by a white dude who they are going to have to take care of into old age? (BTW, women are the ones who instigate the majority of divorces.)

    Replies: @AnotherDad, @Jonathan Mason
  325. @Mr. Anon
    @Mike Tre

    Shakespeare is drama, not history. It is typically held to a different standard of realism. If a black actor is cast as Julius Caesar or Macbeth in those plays, I don't mind, as long as he turns in a good performance.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Mike Tre, @Curle

    Bullshit. Shakespeare is historical, and negrofying his work is an absolutely a rewrite of history. You’re Ok with the current negrofication Nordic mythology and Tolkien’s works?

    •�Replies: @Mr. Anon
    @Mike Tre


    You’re Ok with the current negrofication Nordic mythology and Tolkien’s works?
    No, because I view those as decidedly ethnic in nature.

    But you may have me in a double-standard there.
  326. @Steve Sailer
    @Mr. Anon

    And plays are often put on by small acting troupes, such as Steppenwolf in Chicago in the 1970s. So, if one founding member is black and another is Chinese, they need roles in whatever play they decide to put on: Chekov or whatever. They can't afford to go out and audition a whole bunch of Russian-looking actors. They go to war with the army they've got.

    I'm in favor making it easier rather than harder for young people to put on a show.

    Replies: @Mike Tre, @Colin Wright, @muggles, @Jack D

    You’re making a completely different point. Nobody was talking about small local stage productions. A major Hollywood film with a 7 or 8 figure budget can cast historically appropriate actors. Washington’s casting was pure diversity engineering bullshit and you’re being as obtuse as ever.

  327. ‘…Conversely, should New York’s Metropolitan Museum of Art be hosting an exhibit titled “Flight Into Egypt” celebrating African-Americans’ dubious assertion that blacks are responsible for ancient Egypt’s artistic glories?’

    It could also have been Egyptian Desert Cats — but that too strikes me as improbable.

    Being antisemitic is interesting. There are many ambiguities and matters of perspective to take into account. Realizing that blacks really are somewhat…inferior is dull. It’s obvious, and about as debatable as the claim that the earth goes around the sun.

    •�Replies: @kaganovitch
    @Colin Wright


    Being antisemitic is interesting. There are many ambiguities and matters of perspective to take into account.
    So you're saying Germ Theory is the Dos Equis man? Could be, could be.
  328. @Jack D
    @YetAnotherAnon


    I do wonder if the brutal treatment of civilian Germans, first by RAF Bomber Command, then by the Red Army, then by the post-war occupation and starvation, hasn’t burned something into the collective German soul.
    Yes, it did. It burned into 99% of them never to follow a mad fascist dictator making promises of German glory into ruin again. From now on stick to making high quality export goods and leave the global adventures to the Americans. Why invade Britain or Poland if you can just sell them BMW's and Mercedes and make good $?

    1% of them were die hard Hitler followers and didn't draw the right lesson.

    Replies: @mc23, @Colin Wright, @YetAnotherAnon, @James B. Shearer

    ‘…1% of them were die hard Hitler followers and didn’t draw the right lesson.’

    It would have been considerably more than 1% — to say the least.

    Now, the moral to be drawn from that would be a fruitful topic for debate.

  329. @Steve Sailer
    @Mr. Anon

    And plays are often put on by small acting troupes, such as Steppenwolf in Chicago in the 1970s. So, if one founding member is black and another is Chinese, they need roles in whatever play they decide to put on: Chekov or whatever. They can't afford to go out and audition a whole bunch of Russian-looking actors. They go to war with the army they've got.

    I'm in favor making it easier rather than harder for young people to put on a show.

    Replies: @Mike Tre, @Colin Wright, @muggles, @Jack D

    ‘And plays are often put on by small acting troupes, such as Steppenwolf in Chicago in the 1970s. So, if one founding member is black and another is Chinese, they need roles in whatever play they decide to put on: Chekov or whatever. They can’t afford to go out and audition a whole bunch of Russian-looking actors. They go to war with the army they’ve got…’

    Sure — as far as that goes. But that’s not what is raising so many hackles.

    Forgive me for being crude, but the metaphor that comes to mind is if I piddle on your property. Well, if it’s the parking lot of your wholesale plumbing supply store, and it’s Sunday, and everything is closed, maybe I just had to take a leak. Applause isn’t called for, but perhaps the outrage could be skipped.

    Now, if I come up onto the front porch of your house and cut loose, that’s a different matter. Perhaps expediency wasn’t my sole motive.

  330. @Truth
    @Mr. Anon


    As you note, Vance is articulate – which Trump is not. Vance is also smart – which Trump is not. At least he seldom gives much evidence for it.
    Let me make it simple for you, Caine: Any complete nobody who gets major publishing house offers to write an "autobiography" is your enemy. Think, Barry.

    Replies: @Mr. Anon

    I have no idea who this “Caine” fellow you keep addressing is. It certainly isn’t me.

    So try to leave me out of your internal monologue with the voices in your head.

    That said, your point isn’t a bad one. It almost seems as if Vance was being groomed for high office, hence the autobiography, including film deal. I wonder if maybe Hollywood thought he would be a Democrat.

  331. I was wondering if you could do that when it matters… As it matters in battle.
    -Braveheart

    A lot has changed since 2000. Such as the idea common among the average man, that if he worked hard enough, he could become a gladiator, which is what watching UFC does to him. A point that may be worth making is that it is not what watching boxing does to him.

    [MORE]

    Gladiators do something more primordial than war, but not till training for war became sport did what gladiators do come to mind. One thing that comes to mind watching the UFC is how ugly brute violence is. It is not sexy (as a girl just said to me). And though he is the original Sexiest Man Alive, I know no more brute depiction of what the first war must have looked like than that scene of Mel Gibson with a hatchet in The Patriot. (Except maybe that scene with baseball bats at the end of Casino.)

    That reminds me, you never hear a father say, “I hope my son becomes a soldier.” A good father always fights to keep his son out of war, like in The Patriot. (Or like Hutton Gibson, who moved his family to Australia to keep Mel out of Vietnam.) Yet there is that quote that says a soldier is what every man who was not wishes he had been. Father and Son should ever get together on the issue beforehand, and agree that what will never be regretted is attaining a true soldier’s discipline.

    The difference between someone who attains such discipline and someone who knows he should, but does not, would seem to be a matter of another “d word”: DRIVE.

    That is what they will tell you our most elite warriors have. We used to debate who would win, a UFC fighter or a Navy SEAL. The real fantasy fight though is this: who is the greatest SEAL. That we do not know. But it seems like we should.

    We are left then to debate the question of who would be the greatest SEAL. Which, in my opinion, lends a new prism through which to discuss the recurring topic of just how great Michael Jordan was. More than the size of his hands or how high he could jump or his overall athleticism, it was Jordan’s drive that really set him above the competition. But whence did it come?

    I have a friend that knows of these things who said that what people did not understand about Allen Iverson’s famous rant against practice is that he was not saying practice is not a big deal, he was saying that NBA practices are what they are: a joke. You see, basketball is a sport for very, very tall people, and very tall people who can jump high (or people who are freakishly quick, live Iverson). It is not a skill sport, like baseball or hockey; it is not a sport where there is as much of a sense that it is hard work that pays off. As Kobe Bryant said, for most players, “It’s a job”— that is, not something they are especially driven to do. The movie is called For Love of the Game but the truth is that one reason basketball lacks the literary tradition of baseball is because its players lack the love that makes special moments when the game has become just a job, when some vet can relieve the quotidian by some pearl won out of gratitude for the blessing of doing what he loves for a living. As fate would have it, the player whose reminiscences for his playing days have proven to be the most valuable as a literary trove are those of Allen Iverson.

    The point though is this, that Jordan’s drive was not a product of a competitive environment; it was not something that survived a test—it was something he always had. Drive is manifest in work ethic, and the way to put it would not be to say Jordan outworked everyone else, because that implies everyone else was working hard. Rather, the way to say it is that Jordan rose above the competition and set his own standard, which was somewhere close to as much as he could do. The fact that he came to the game with this drive makes him more of a natural than the players who learned what it takes to be great from his example. To be a natural who works hard is a very special thing to be.

    What specifically drove Jordan has been much publicized. The extent of his own insight was that he needed other people to challenge him to maintain the motivation that propelled him. But basketball is sport not war, and Jordan never found the appropriate vocabulary for what exactly his driving instinct was. No, he never did. When he spoke of it he sounded like he was expressing some kind of an underdog complex. Why did he care what Jeff Van Gundy thought about him? He thought the fact that attacks motivated him is what made him great, he understood that, but it was as though he never really knew what he was. Rather than someone who always felt like the underdog, or came to understand that he always needed to feel like the underdog, the psychology of Michael Jordan would more correctly be labeled a King Complex, or a conquerors temperament: his was the natural reaction of a king that is besieged. David Halberstam’s biography was titled Playing for Keeps but it should have been called King of the Hill. As far as I know, Jordan had not the habit of referring to his competitors or his critics as his “enemies,” though that is certainly what they were to him in his gut. What Jordan might have realized in that regard is that he felt a lot like King David, who so often expressed, and so trenchantly articulated, what it feels like to want to have your enemies destroyed.

    And how was he to his teammates?

    One of the stories that came out in The Jordan Rules was what Bill Cartwright said he would do to Jordan if Jordan did not stop riding him. He said he would break his legs. As far as we know, Cartwright was the only person who ever said such a thing to Jordan.* Of course, Cartwright was a veteran and a seven footer. Maybe the point though is that Jordan was even riding him.

    That is what they always used to say, that he would “ride” them. And that is what you saw in The Last Dance, the ten-part behind-the-scenes documentary that came out in 2020 during the covid lockdown. The way Jordan treated his teammates, that (they say) is why it took such a long time to get him to agree to allow the 500 hours of original footage to be shaped up into a series and released. He does not seem to be comfortable with that side of himself. Nor does he seem to really understand it.

    In the first round of the 98 playoffs, the Bulls played the Nets, who were coached by John Calipari. The coaching style of Phil Jackson, especially as he aged, was famously placid. Calipari’s was not. He stayed up at the side line, animating his opinion of every bit of the game with the fervor of one who either does not realize he looks a little unhinged or of one who enjoys being a little unhinged. Then came the hour of judgment that I suspect he has not forgotten since.

    Jordan was standing at mid court with his hands on his hips staring at Calipari as Calipari was yelling something at his players, all animated. Then Calipari realized Jordan was staring at him. Eyes met, and Jordan shook his head, then just looked away. This was something of a moment of clarity for Calipari, he came to himself, and later said something like he did not want any more of that look ever again. He was calmer after that.

    The question is, what was Jordan, who would ride his teammates so hard, what exactly was he shaking his head at?

    The 92 Olympics in Barcelona may have been Jordan’s most graceful moment. Barkley led the team in scoring, and made a point of dominating the foreigners, even though in America they were not. Steve has described Barkley’s schtick as the stuff of a “charming rogue” and Barkley probably is, but there is a side of him that either does not know his own strength or is just a typical bully, and Jordan once took note of this in a reflection on the 92 games. Jordan said Barkley had been the “ugly American,” he had been that when he should have realized that the foreigners were rather in awe of them. He should have been as gracious as Jordan was to those who were rather more like children in comparison.

    We are always more honest when we are judging ourselves than when we are judging others, but if you keep the notion of projection in mind, you can learn a lot about a person by remembering who is really being described when someone is judging others, especially if they are making a particularly insightful judgement of them. These two judgments by Jordan of Calipari and of Barkley are basically the same judgment, but each teach us about Jordan in their own way.

    When he was asked about his particular style of leadership, Jordan actually broke down and cried, and said he was always only trying to bring out the best in them. What he should have said, however, is this: “It was the only thing I knew.”

    They say we are unaware of our most conspicuous traits. If that is true, in general at least, then it is also true that we are even less aware of why we are the way we are. For example, it is almost certain that Michael Jordan does not know that the reason he cries the way he does is because he was taught not to cry. And he was probably taught that by his older brother Larry, who we know from the accounts of their father is who would be beat Michael mercilessly on the basketball court in the backyard of their home in Wilmington when he was a little boy. Beat him at basketball, that is. But mercilessly. Imagine that. It was all he knew.

    Childhood trauma is most usefully thought of as something we all experience, but which each of us experience more or less. We seem to know that certain trauma in early childhood makes those children a certain way as adults. But the same trauma does different things to different people. Being traumatized by someone you admire is different than being traumatized by someone you hate, or someone you are mostly afraid of, or are very afraid of. And do not forget that we are speaking about children; it is obviously much harder to traumatize an adult.

    When The Last Dance came out, critics opined that all that riding teammates Jordan did in his playing days was probably not necessary. That is almost certainly true. What also seems almost certainly true is that Michael Jordan should ride the little rich white kids that go to his camps, he should push them and yell at them and never show them mercy, instead of joking around with them and being kind to them and leaving them more spoiled than when they got there. In short, he should do to them what his big brother did to him. And he should make sure they know not to cry.

    You will hear them tell you to get in touch with your “inner child.” True, to a man, nothing could sound more soft-headed. But I would submit that there is more Biblical wisdom in that idea than he has who thinks he is wise and still watches, as a kid does at least, a child’s game. Maybe the reason Michael Jordan conceived of himself as an underdog was, after all, more revealing of the truth of who he is than we have been able to see: that he conceived of himself that way because he is still at heart that little boy in the backyard who never got used to getting pushed around.

    Of course, Jordan was, as they say, The Man— but he was a man who apparently did not know what fuel there was to be found in the word of God for a king like him. And, alas, nor did he make it a point of thanking God for all he had been given by Him. As mom would say, David didn’t make that shot against Goliath: God did.

    In this culture of hero-worship of athletes, we could at least expect them to do what is right when it comes time to talk. No one tunes in to hear them talk but it is always a little fun to hear what they say, and some of them do get it right by beginning and ending by giving glory to God. We are not sure if they are even good for anything else, anything besides drawing the public’s attention to how much the greatest owe their Creator.

    In between thanking God and glorifying Him, these athletes, and the number one athlete in particular, could not do better than remember who every boy owes the most to, his father. And for all the many athletes who never met or don’t really know theirs, they might do well to consider in that regard who else they never met but still owe everything to. Honoring your father is a commandment that God did not qualify. There is always a gracious thing to do, even, or especially when, it is only gracious.

    Yes, fathers and their sons. What more is sports about? What more are they really for? I was not born when Jordan made that shot against Georgetown to win the national championship, and I did not see the iconic buzzer beater on Craig Ehlo in 89. But I did see the shot that won ring number six in 98 against the Jazz. Witnessing it though is only still a special memory to me for one reason. Which is that my father showed up right before it happened and got to watch it with me. I was in the basement, on the edge of my seat, when Dad came down quite unexpectedly. I don’t remember if he woke up or could not sleep that night but it was the first time he had ever joined me to watch a late-night game. Mind you I considered myself at the time the biggest Michael Jordan fan in the world, never mind what anyone else said, I knew that’s what I was.

    We had mentioned before about a (relative) lack of the love of the game of basketball among its players, just about all of whom were more born to play than love to play. To that point, Occam’s Razor regarding why Jordan quit basketball and went into baseball is this: he did that because, as he had always said, baseball was his favorite sport. He loved most what he was not as good at. I suppose God often does that to us, in this life, anyway.

    But one thing Jordan did love is why he was the most clutch player of all time, and probably that across all sports, ever. (He really was something.) What he loved was the spotlight. Which is to be distinguished from Fame. That he always seems to have hated. He hated it so much that he retired at the height of it. But the spotlight, that are those moments when the game has a chance to be won, and you know everyone knows it is all about you. Yes, Michael Jordan loved those moments. He lived for those moments. And he was worthy enough at what he did best to make those moments memories. Good for him. (Now, thank God!)

    Can you acquire a love of the spotlight? I don’t know. Nor do I know what it is like to be in a fire fight. But I know Hemingway said it is about being graceful: “Courage is grace under fire.” That though might, that might be ridiculous. For example, when I went out for water polo in college the coach told me that I had a very long and pretty stroke but that in the sport of water polo it was about taking short, choppy strokes. He who is graceful on a battlefield is probably not aware that he is being like a ballerina, not a warrior. Hemingway had the right idea but not the right word (even if grace is not exactly the wrong word.) The sniper in Saving Private Ryan is not graceful—he is serene. NBA players may look graceful on the court even when they are scared, but in the big moments only the special players are serene.

    Now back to that night in the basement with my Dad. He came down, and then Jordan pulled the move and made the shot, and Bob Costas called him The King, and the greatest ending any athlete ever had to their sports career was in the books, and almost perfect— almost perfect, for, as Michael Wilbon noted, it wasn’t a buzzer beater and it wasn’t game seven. Indeed, though, almost perfect. Dad said, “It was a great move.”

    There was more though–and alas for that. Even though I thought I was his biggest fan in the world, I did not want Michael Jordan to come back and play for my hometown team. That, too, I suppose, is about my father. Who has instilled in me a patrimony that could be distilled down to one thing and one reminder: the one true faith is the thing, and the reminder is his own way of stating the importance of final perseverance: what he always said to me was “Finish strong.”

    You are always supposed to finish strong.

    Which brings us to the end of this piece. One time I got caught in a bar talking about Michael Jordan like I knew him, next to some guys who knew better than to do that. I was talking about the time Jordan made a joke about the difference between Dean Smith and Bobby Knight, but one way of putting what I had done in that bar is just to say that I like my little brother’s name. The meaning of which, if you didn’t know, is a question: Who is like God? It is a name that kind of makes you wonder, does it not?

    This year was the year that, in the footsteps of St Francis, I observed for the first time St Michael’s Lent. Every day I prayed St Michael’s litany, and about that I can report this, that I have never felt more spiritually inspired than praying that litany made me feel in those moments of prayer.

    At that time shall Michael rise up, the great prince, who standeth for the children of thy people.

    I used to own a VHS about Michael Jordan that was so old the picture of him on the box is from when he still had hair. Yeah, he was younger then than he is now. And so was I. The VHS includes footage of his father, who does not seem like he was a hard man, and in the footage, he was talking about God, actually. And I remember one thing he said. He said, “Michael was born to do one thing.” One thing.

    But what did you do with your talent?

    *Cartwright came to the Bulls in a trade for Charles Oakley, who had been Jordan’s protector, he was known as his “enforcer.” The Bulls needed a center when they made the trade, but knowing how they were, you kind of get the sense that management might have traded Oakley out of some unpublished spite. Him and Jordan, they were supposed to stay together (maybe only to grow apart as men). What might have been? We can only imagine. Possibly two more championships, the ones that went to the Bad Boys instead. The Jordan Rules were operative because the Reign of Oakley was not an option.

    •�Replies: @Lugash
    @The Spiritual Works of Mercy


    One of the stories that came out in The Jordan Rules was what Bill Cartwright said he would do to Jordan if Jordan did not stop riding him. He said he would break his legs. As far as we know, Cartwright was the only person who ever said such a thing to Jordan.* Of course, Cartwright was a veteran and a seven footer. Maybe the point though is that Jordan was even riding him.
    Jayson Williams said in a magazine interview way back that Jordan was one of the hardest players in the NBA; he was all smiles and I like Mike in the public but if you angered him he would find you after the game and put your ass on the floor.
  332. @AnotherDad
    @Brutusale

    Sexy model and pic. But not an actual Aston-Martin ad.

    Is however a reminder of the beauty that is being destroyed by listening to these parasitic loons and their nation destroying ideology.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @Je Suis Omar Mateen

    “Sexy model and pic. But not an actual Aston-Martin ad.”

    Not an actual woman either. And not an actual kitchen. Or actual anything.

    Gawsh, boombooms are imbeciles.

    •�Agree: Adam Smith
  333. @Anonymous
    @Mark G.

    Seeing as Trump was in fact elected, the alternative to him picking RFK is not Fauci. The alternative is picking someone else: for instance, someone who understands science and the research/funding process. Not a lawyer whose specialty is BS.

    Replies: @Mr. Anon

    Seeing as Trump was in fact elected, the alternative to him picking RFK is not Fauci. The alternative is picking someone else: for instance, someone who understands science and the research/funding process. Not a lawyer whose specialty is BS.

    Why is that a problem? How many Secretaries of Energy could formally define what “energy” is. How many Secretaries of Agriculture have evern farmed?

    The NIAID research/funding process as run by Anthony Fauci for nearly forty years (RFK Jr. referred to him as the J. Edgar Hoover of Public Health) in which Fauci’s toadies and cronies get funding as long as they toe his line and stroke his ego and dissenting voices are crushed is part of the problem. Fauci funded GoF research both in the US and abroad, the endpoint of which is creating pathogens that are more deadly even than those found in nature. That may very well have been the origin of COVID-19.

  334. @Mr. Anon
    OT - Democracy!

    German Lutheran Church Bans AfD Members From Committees, Calls Party 'Anti-Human'

    Germany’s Lutheran Church will now exclude members of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party from any leadership positions due to the party’s politics.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/german-lutheran-church-bans-afd-members-committees-calls-party-anti-human
    Of course the church in German is state funded.

    There is also a move afoot to ban the AfD, now the second most popular political party - because Democracy.

    Replies: @muggles

    There is also a move afoot to ban the AfD, now the second most popular political party – because Democracy.

    That was the real goal of the Harris/Obama/Pelosi takeover.

    Maybe in Year 2, when you are settled in with judges and DAs and the media, you push for that.

    “Save Democracy!” was a Harris campaign theme.

    If the GOP was going all-Trump, time to take it out like they were doing to Trump and his former employees.

    Didn’t work out for them. Germany is entering a self-created recession. Banning real opposition will only work for so long.

    With Putin cutting their undersea cables to Scandinavia, factories closing and exports dwindling in a newly created energy poor nation, the status quo has got to go.

  335. @Reg Cæsar
    @muggles


    Likewise, there is no claim that Jesus was literate that I’m aware of.
    John, Ch. 8:

    6 They were using this question as a trap, in order to have a basis for accusing him.

    But Jesus bent down and started to write on the ground with his finger. 7 When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, “Let any one of you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her.” 8 Again he stooped down and wrote on the ground.

    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John%207%3A53-8%3A11&version=NIV

    Note, it's "wrote", not "drew".

    Replies: @muggles

    Okay, that and perhaps other biblical bits may suggest that Jesus was literate.

    Yet very odd. I am unaware of any of his disciples referencing them or referring to texts.

    Obviously “disciple commentary” which was cobbled together from various older sources here and there is not necessarily conclusive.

    In general, religious prophets of major religions until fairly modern times were not known by their alleged direct writings.

    Even the indirect reported commentary is not often very reliably sourced.

    Since very few people could read, it didn’t seem important to spend time writing things down on expensive materials which even then were quite perishable.

    Very few if any original ancient Roman or Greek scrolls or writing other than carved stone, exist.

    I don’t believe Mohammad is credited with any directly written texts. Though some may be said to have been dictated or recited.

    Today we are flooded with various means of preserving writing, speech, visual information, sounds and song, and many easy access formats.

    The world until about 1500 was known though song and tales told often.

    Some major civilizations had no written languages: ancient Carthage and the Khan Mongols. Most of Africa, the Americas and island Pacific region had no written languages, a few sparse records at most.

    It may help religions to survive over time by being mysterious and reflective in the origins of many of their precepts. Modern religious prophets seem to wear out their appeal pretty quickly.

    Too much detail can subtract: “shoes must be worn all day Sunday”, or “turnips are among the holy plants which should be in your gardens.”

    Fortunately, Jesus’s admonition that “Men shall not wear pony tales or man buns” was lost in the mists of time. So, we get to call that one for ourselves.

  336. @Steve Sailer
    @Mr. Anon

    And plays are often put on by small acting troupes, such as Steppenwolf in Chicago in the 1970s. So, if one founding member is black and another is Chinese, they need roles in whatever play they decide to put on: Chekov or whatever. They can't afford to go out and audition a whole bunch of Russian-looking actors. They go to war with the army they've got.

    I'm in favor making it easier rather than harder for young people to put on a show.

    Replies: @Mike Tre, @Colin Wright, @muggles, @Jack D

    I’m in favor making it easier rather than harder for young people to put on a show.

    As I understand it (though old information) it is expensive to get legal rights to perform many plays which are still under copyright or intellectual ownership.

    High school productions, and college, may get some breaks but costs are (or were) based on theater size, # performances, etc.

    Also, additional costs if music is involved.

    This is assuming they are nonunion. Add in stages, props and theater rentals, you have a financial hurdle. Most local companies and some larger national ones are “nonprofits” and raise outside funds.

  337. @AnotherDad
    Related: Musk's recent comment:

    Instead of teaching fear of pregnancy, we should teach fear of childlessness.
    was great to see, a definite push in the right direction. Musk, of course, is wise enough to stay away from anything wading into racial territory, but he's fairly upfront on the eugenic--need more smart people breeding--angle. Which, of course, he has been vigorously doing himself. (Musk actually acts like you'd expect a swashbuckling billionaire to act. "It's good to be the king.")

    My critique of Trump--beyond the general stuff about his personality, intellectual effort, discipline and effectiveness--centers on his failure to really directly tie immigration to the destruction of "affordable family formation" and the "American Dream" for young Americans. If he'd done this clearly and effectively, he would have really broken through with young people and we'd be living with a whole new political paradigm. But Trump--"it's going to be great"--is Trump. We are going to have to wait for some post-Trump nationalist with clearer thinking to push forward.

    But it's great to see someone with visibility like Musk driving the critical demographic issues back into the public realm. We've had 60 years of anti-empirical, anti-biological nonsense and lies from, well, the usual suspects. Finally, we're seeing someone with high public profile pushing biological reality back into view.

    Replies: @Mr. Anon

    My critique of Trump–beyond the general stuff about his personality, intellectual effort, discipline and effectiveness–centers on his failure to really directly tie immigration to the destruction of “affordable family formation” and the “American Dream” for young Americans.

    That would also be a way of highlighting the fact that isn’t just illegal immigration that is a problem. It is legal immigration that also needs to be curtailed.

  338. @Odyssey
    @mc23

    Cleopatra was the last member of the Ptolemaic dynasty. Ptolemy himself was given Egypt to rule after the poisoning of Alexander the Great. Alexander himself, as well as his dukes/generals - Seleucus (who gained Persia), Cassander (who gained the Balkans), and Ptolemy were Serbs, although those who are quite late in mental development think that Alexander was Greek.

    Replies: @AnotherDad, @Apostolos, @mc23

    those who are quite late in mental development think that Alexander was Greek.

    HUH ?

    How come the late in mental development Hellenes speak the most complete almost heavenly language ?

    And the language of the supossedly superior Slavs is in comparison of dubious mentality.

    You know I have only for people believing this (including you) a huge seaside lot in Jupiter dirt cheap and with infinite installments.

  339. @Bardon Kaldian
    @J.Ross

    I wrote "mentally sane & normal person".

    Replies: @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality

    Your side hates Russia because it is a big white country that intends to stay that way. And your side especially hates it for being anti-gay/trans.

    Oddly, although I don’t think Sailer and Cochran are queer, they both seem to have the same antipathy toward healthy heterosexual male assertiveness that queers do.

    •�Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality


    And your side especially hates it for being anti-gay/trans.
    That "gay/trans" is a "thing" at all is a completely white man's phenomenon. Even the most tolerant non-whites, e.g. Thais, merely carve out a "safe space" for what are viewed as a thin sliver of harmless nuts. "Equality" and celebration are as white as white gets.

    So the Russians have more in common with Africans than with their "fellow" Europeans, who have mostly all swallowed the pink pill. Where is your racial loyalty? "If it's white, it must be right!"

    the same antipathy toward healthy heterosexual male assertiveness that queers do.
    Barging into an online forum to announce that the whole of three thousand years of moral philosophy is meaningless, and that only you-- and a few "uncontacted" tribes in the wilderness-- have the answer is certainly assertive. Few would call it "healthy".

    Your side hates Russia because it is a big white country that intends to stay that way.
    By annexing Ukraine to balance these? The non-white part is actually bigger, by area.

    https://www.aljazeera.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/AP22129383329879.jpg


    https://i0.wp.com/www.gemmagoesglobal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/IMG_5021-scaled.jpg

    https://www.56thparallel.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/17134_900-min.jpg.webp

    https://optim.tildacdn.one/tild3434-3966-4165-b662-396437393836/-/format/webp/Ethnic.jpg

    Replies: @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality, @Mike Tre
  340. @Twinkie
    @Dutch Boy


    Byzantine is a term used by historians. The people termed Byzantine considered themselves Romans and were so considered by their enemies.
    "The Byzantines" called themselves Romaioi, a term I always found amusing, it being "Romans" in Greek, rather than Latin.

    Replies: @anon, @Jonathan Mason, @Johann Ricke

    “The Byzantines” called themselves Romaioi, a term I always found amusing, it being “Romans” in Greek, rather than Latin.

    What I don’t get is why they did not simply call themselves Greeks. It’s not as if there were no precedent for Greek empire.

    •�Replies: @anon
    @Johann Ricke

    Duh. Because they were the real Romans. Have you not read the articles by Laurent Guyenot and First millennium revisionist on this site?

    The Italian romans were the copycats.
  341. @Wokechoke
    @YetAnotherAnon

    The Blitz did burn something into the English. Which they metered out 10 fold back.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon

    To be fair, we Brits started the bombing of Germany before they started bombing us. It was on a relatively light scale, because we only had light bombers like Hampdens with small bomb loads.

    But … Germany had already bombed central Rotterdam pretty flat, on May 13 1940, before the RAF started bombing German cities. (The picture is after they’d cleared the rubble and probably pulled down seriously damaged buildings).

    •�Replies: @Older Palo Altan
    @YetAnotherAnon

    The destruction of Rotterdam was briefly mourned by the families which had ruled the city financially ands politically for centuries. Once the decencies had been observed however they rejoiced: a modern city (and port) could now be built to rival and surpass anything the rest of Europe could offer. So eager were they to start from scratch that even the St Laurence Church (shown in this haunting photo) came within a whisker of being demolished. Today it sits, superbly restored, in the middle of the ugliest city centre in Europe.

    The port, on the other hand, is admittedly magnificent.
  342. I see a French TV channel has been fined for calling abortion “the world’s leading cause of death”.

    Hat tip to Mr Anglin.

    I (and I hope Steve) would love to know the racial breakdown of those 73 million.

    •�Replies: @Jonathan Mason
    @YetAnotherAnon

    It seems odd to separate out cancer and tobacco as separate causes of death.

    Of course smoking tobacco can cause all kinds of respiratory ailments other than cancer, but I wonder how accurate these global statistics can be.

    Anyway I suppose the implication is that if you are opposed to legal abortion, then you should also be opposed to legal smoking of tobacco.
  343. @Bardon Kaldian
    @Old Prude

    Because your moral & legal coordinates do not belong to a civilized society.

    Replies: @Old Prude

    I didn’t know civilized society preferred pointless war to statecraft. I guess I should have figured that after the last fifty years of America meddling. Thank you for setting me straight.

  344. @Jack D
    @YetAnotherAnon


    I do wonder if the brutal treatment of civilian Germans, first by RAF Bomber Command, then by the Red Army, then by the post-war occupation and starvation, hasn’t burned something into the collective German soul.
    Yes, it did. It burned into 99% of them never to follow a mad fascist dictator making promises of German glory into ruin again. From now on stick to making high quality export goods and leave the global adventures to the Americans. Why invade Britain or Poland if you can just sell them BMW's and Mercedes and make good $?

    1% of them were die hard Hitler followers and didn't draw the right lesson.

    Replies: @mc23, @Colin Wright, @YetAnotherAnon, @James B. Shearer

    I wonder if similar brutal treatment will produce similar results in Palestine?

    (Not that I think the underlying German psyche is that different – it’s just a different bunch telling them what to do and who to hate)

  345. Anonymous[402] •�Disclaimer says:
    @Jack D
    @Mike Tre

    At what age should you become immune from criminal prosecution?

    Germany (and most European countries) doesn't have the equivalent of our 1st Amendment and so they can and do consider Holocaust denial to be a crime under their laws.

    The Germans have their reasons for having such laws. The last time Nazis took power in German, 7 or 8 million Germans died, their major cities were bombed into rubble, their country was divided for almost 50 years, major swaths of territory were lost and Germany's reputation was permanently marred, so they don't really want to repeat the exercise. The Jews did not write these laws. If you don't think that Holocaust denial should be a crime (at at any age) then write to the German legislature and ask them to repeal these laws.

    Replies: @Joe Stalin, @Anonymous

    Germany has a lot of laws because we imposed them on Germany. Everyone knows that.

    If they wanted to ban ideologies that “cause harm”, they would ban the teaching of communism. Since it was the Soviets who killed the majority of Germans.

    But the insanity is the belief that getting rid of free speech and having an authoritarian state is the way to protect yourself from a fascist leader. Lol.

  346. @Je Suis Omar Mateen
    @Brutusale

    That's gotta be AI: drawers or safe deposit boxes waay above the countertop, a fullsize faucet plus hazy baby faucet two feet away, about a foot of dead space betwixt wall and island....... and a 12-year-old boy in FMPs. So their target customer is a pedo who hires impossibly sh**ty carpenters?

    Replies: @Brutusale, @Isabel Archer
    •�Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
    @Brutusale

    I see a used BMW ad actually used that strapline, complete with pretty girl.

    https://www.aston-martin.com/files/2013/02/bmw-ad.jpg
    , @Jack D
    @Brutusale

    I don't think deep fake is the right word. It was a fake ad but not at all deep. How hard is it to cut and paste the Aston Martin logo into an ad?

    A deep fake is to paste someone's face (with the correct perspective, facial expression and lip movement) onto another body in every frame of a video and possibly mimic their voice as well, which requires a LOT more processing power.

    Replies: @Ministry Of Tongues, @Jenner Ickham Errican
  347. @Brutusale
    @Je Suis Omar Mateen

    It's a proto-deep fake from 10 years ago.

    https://www.carscoops.com/2013/02/aston-martin-used-car-ad-takedown/

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @Jack D

    I see a used BMW ad actually used that strapline, complete with pretty girl.

  348. @Jack D
    @Anon

    That's ridiculous. The blacks who are into the Hotep/We Wuz Kangs stuff are also the blacks who are the most anti-Semitic and the ones who are most detached from mainstream and academic media sources.

    Getting rid of Joos is not the all purpose solution to all of America's ills that the Men of Unz seem to think it is. You will still have your blacks (which BTW YOU and not the Jews brought here) and they will be just as troublesome as they have been for the last 400 years.

    If blacks are less troublesome in other countries it is because WASPs were always wooly headed and had a soft spot in their bleeding hearts for them and for every other type of loser. Was there ever any equivalent of the New England abolitionist movement in Brazil?

    Replies: @Mark G., @AnotherDad, @Curle, @newrouter

    Yes and no.

    The blacks who are into the Hotep/We Wuz Kangs stuff are also the blacks who are the most anti-Semitic and the ones who are most detached from mainstream and academic media sources.

    Obviously, blacks are quite capable of ginning up all sorts we wuz kangs nonsense on their own. See Elijah Muhammed.

    But mainstream society humoring and worse elite institutions parroting this crap was essentially non-existent until the rise of the Jews pushing minoritarianism, centering big bad whitey’s “oppression” as the core American narrative–and font of virtue/status for the “oppressed”–using blacks’ experience of slavery, Jim Crow–Jews own “oppression” in America being too trivial for anyone to take seriously–as the cudgel to beat on and delegitimate whitey, majoritarian republicanism, America.

    And no, I don’t have to make this up, because Jewish leaders always go and trot out the great black-Jewish alliance (of resisting evil whitey’s oppression) whenever they need to get the rambunctious negros back on side (i.e. supporting what Jews want to do).

    If blacks are less troublesome in other countries it is because WASPs were always wooly headed and had a soft spot in their bleeding hearts for them and for every other type of loser. Was there ever any equivalent of the New England abolitionist movement in Brazil?

    It’s the WASPs!

    Abolition drew on some strains of Christian do-gooder utopianism, that have to be checked in the real world. But abolition of slavery is of course a good thing and unsurprising that WASPs were at the forefront of it.

    The West was on a strong upward trajectory–Christianity, abolishing serfdom, modern science, technological advance, movement toward republican equality. The sort of “we’re all in this together” human progress easier to get in more one-peopleish nations unburdened by too much caste diversity or tedious middle-man minorities. Slavery was serious backstep for the West, that came with encountering primitive peoples along with opportunity to exploit new raw land. The siren call of “cheap labor!” to make big profits was too great. It was goodness that there were WASPs who wanted to steer the West back on track–and help stamp out this scourge world wide. Of course, these sentiments were not unique to Anglos, lots of Christian folks wished to rid themselves of slavery. Brazil–the biggest slave state in the New World–with a different, Catholic, culture abolished slavery a generation later (and without a big war). The huge difficulty, of course, was that we could not put the ink back in the bottle–reverse the 1619 mistake.

    Far from “wooly headed” the salient philosophical/ideological characteristics of WASPs–Anglos–has been “empiricism”. They went out into the world and observed what actually existed–studied it, tried to figure out what was going on. They might argue for a generation, but the guy who was backed up with the data would win the Royal Society debate in the end. Anglos dealt with the world as it is. And–generally–did stuff that worked. The Anglo nations used to be some of the best places on earth to live.

    It was Jews–not WASPs–who cooked up all this anti-empirical, thoroughly “wooly headed” “race does not exist” nonsense. It was your boys like Stephen J. Gould or Richard Lewontin doing the old Jewish “I yap therefore it is true” fantasizing (lying)–not their WASPy antagonists James Watson or E.O. Wilson mired in empirical reality. (And likewise with all the anti-IQ stuff on the psychology side. Anglo empiricism and progress, versus Jewish anti-scientific fantasizing, obfuscating and lying.)

    One need only compare the trajectory of America under the WASPs versus with the post-coup “under new management” regime. The sad reality is American Jews–given such an incredible opportunity by America–have been extremely destructive–ideologically, culturally, politically–to the American nation. And through dominance–and willingness to shout their lies louder–of American academia and media flooded the rest of the West, and to a lesser extent the world with their anti-empirical nonsense and minoritarian bilge.

    But we get it. You’re a Jew. Jews good. Nobel Prizes, sunshine and blue skies. It’s the “wooly headed” WASPs.

    •�Replies: @Jack D
    @AnotherDad

    For every Stephen J. Gould there was a WASP scientist saying the same thing. Only in your antisemitic imagination is "race does not exist" a solely Jewish thing.

    A lot of the civil rights stuff, BTW, was the sponsored by the Soviets to undermine the West and give themselves a "but whatabout" excuse for their own domestic oppression. KGB Agent Putin has continued along the same path.
    , @Anonymous
    @AnotherDad

    Is your ”gentiles dindoo nuffin” framing really “Anglo empiricism”? Because it sure sounds a lot more like you are projecting your own ethnic favoritism on to Jews.
    https://quillette.com/2018/03/15/alt-right-gets-wrong-jews/
  349. @Je Suis Omar Mateen
    @Brutusale

    That's gotta be AI: drawers or safe deposit boxes waay above the countertop, a fullsize faucet plus hazy baby faucet two feet away, about a foot of dead space betwixt wall and island....... and a 12-year-old boy in FMPs. So their target customer is a pedo who hires impossibly sh**ty carpenters?

    Replies: @Brutusale, @Isabel Archer

    What are FMPs? A Google search doesn’t explain this acronym.

    •�Replies: @Je Suis Omar Mateen
    @Isabel Archer

    "What are FMPs? A Google search doesn’t explain this acronym."

    [Breed] Me Pumps

    F**k Me Pumps
  350. Off topic, for Steve:

    Love how you weave random pieces of quiz show knowledge into (relevant) points within articles.

    Just wondered if you had ever heard of this church: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sagrada_Fam%C3%ADlia

  351. @AnotherDad
    @Jack D

    Yes and no.

    The blacks who are into the Hotep/We Wuz Kangs stuff are also the blacks who are the most anti-Semitic and the ones who are most detached from mainstream and academic media sources.
    Obviously, blacks are quite capable of ginning up all sorts we wuz kangs nonsense on their own. See Elijah Muhammed.

    But mainstream society humoring and worse elite institutions parroting this crap was essentially non-existent until the rise of the Jews pushing minoritarianism, centering big bad whitey's "oppression" as the core American narrative--and font of virtue/status for the "oppressed"--using blacks' experience of slavery, Jim Crow--Jews own "oppression" in America being too trivial for anyone to take seriously--as the cudgel to beat on and delegitimate whitey, majoritarian republicanism, America.

    And no, I don't have to make this up, because Jewish leaders always go and trot out the great black-Jewish alliance (of resisting evil whitey's oppression) whenever they need to get the rambunctious negros back on side (i.e. supporting what Jews want to do).

    If blacks are less troublesome in other countries it is because WASPs were always wooly headed and had a soft spot in their bleeding hearts for them and for every other type of loser. Was there ever any equivalent of the New England abolitionist movement in Brazil?
    It's the WASPs!

    Abolition drew on some strains of Christian do-gooder utopianism, that have to be checked in the real world. But abolition of slavery is of course a good thing and unsurprising that WASPs were at the forefront of it.

    The West was on a strong upward trajectory--Christianity, abolishing serfdom, modern science, technological advance, movement toward republican equality. The sort of "we're all in this together" human progress easier to get in more one-peopleish nations unburdened by too much caste diversity or tedious middle-man minorities. Slavery was serious backstep for the West, that came with encountering primitive peoples along with opportunity to exploit new raw land. The siren call of "cheap labor!" to make big profits was too great. It was goodness that there were WASPs who wanted to steer the West back on track--and help stamp out this scourge world wide. Of course, these sentiments were not unique to Anglos, lots of Christian folks wished to rid themselves of slavery. Brazil--the biggest slave state in the New World--with a different, Catholic, culture abolished slavery a generation later (and without a big war). The huge difficulty, of course, was that we could not put the ink back in the bottle--reverse the 1619 mistake.

    Far from "wooly headed" the salient philosophical/ideological characteristics of WASPs--Anglos--has been "empiricism". They went out into the world and observed what actually existed--studied it, tried to figure out what was going on. They might argue for a generation, but the guy who was backed up with the data would win the Royal Society debate in the end. Anglos dealt with the world as it is. And--generally--did stuff that worked. The Anglo nations used to be some of the best places on earth to live.

    It was Jews--not WASPs--who cooked up all this anti-empirical, thoroughly "wooly headed" "race does not exist" nonsense. It was your boys like Stephen J. Gould or Richard Lewontin doing the old Jewish "I yap therefore it is true" fantasizing (lying)--not their WASPy antagonists James Watson or E.O. Wilson mired in empirical reality. (And likewise with all the anti-IQ stuff on the psychology side. Anglo empiricism and progress, versus Jewish anti-scientific fantasizing, obfuscating and lying.)

    One need only compare the trajectory of America under the WASPs versus with the post-coup "under new management" regime. The sad reality is American Jews--given such an incredible opportunity by America--have been extremely destructive--ideologically, culturally, politically--to the American nation. And through dominance--and willingness to shout their lies louder--of American academia and media flooded the rest of the West, and to a lesser extent the world with their anti-empirical nonsense and minoritarian bilge.

    But we get it. You're a Jew. Jews good. Nobel Prizes, sunshine and blue skies. It's the "wooly headed" WASPs.

    Replies: @Jack D, @Anonymous

    For every Stephen J. Gould there was a WASP scientist saying the same thing. Only in your antisemitic imagination is “race does not exist” a solely Jewish thing.

    A lot of the civil rights stuff, BTW, was the sponsored by the Soviets to undermine the West and give themselves a “but whatabout” excuse for their own domestic oppression. KGB Agent Putin has continued along the same path.

  352. @Brutusale
    @Je Suis Omar Mateen

    It's a proto-deep fake from 10 years ago.

    https://www.carscoops.com/2013/02/aston-martin-used-car-ad-takedown/

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon, @Jack D

    I don’t think deep fake is the right word. It was a fake ad but not at all deep. How hard is it to cut and paste the Aston Martin logo into an ad?

    A deep fake is to paste someone’s face (with the correct perspective, facial expression and lip movement) onto another body in every frame of a video and possibly mimic their voice as well, which requires a LOT more processing power.

    •�Replies: @Ministry Of Tongues
    @Jack D

    https://futurism.com/the-byte/parents-furious-school-accused-covering-up-ai-generated-nudes
    , @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @Jack D


    I don’t think deep fake is the right word.
    Fascinating, but Brutusale didn’t write “deep fake”. Slow down and read it again.

    Replies: @Jack D
  353. @Steve Sailer
    @Mr. Anon

    And plays are often put on by small acting troupes, such as Steppenwolf in Chicago in the 1970s. So, if one founding member is black and another is Chinese, they need roles in whatever play they decide to put on: Chekov or whatever. They can't afford to go out and audition a whole bunch of Russian-looking actors. They go to war with the army they've got.

    I'm in favor making it easier rather than harder for young people to put on a show.

    Replies: @Mike Tre, @Colin Wright, @muggles, @Jack D

    Remember that in the original Shakespeare productions, all the female roles were performed by dudes. That’s a lot worse than having a black guy play Macbeth.

    While characters like Macbeth and Hamlet are quasi-historical, they really portray universal concepts. When Hamlet asks, “To be or not to be?” he is not really speaking as a Dane but as a human and any human can ask that existential question. It is for this very reason that we still perform Shakespeare 400 years later when most other works of that time are so rooted in their time and place that they mean nothing to our lives today and can only be viewed as antique curiosities.

    What I do object to is putting blacks into recognizable and contemporary roles where they clearly do not belong. It’s one thing to cast a black dude as Hamlet but another to cast one as Winston Churchill. No one has done that yet but the other day I saw a preview for an upcoming movie called Blitz.

    The movie is about the German bombing of London and about all the children who were evacuated to the British countryside and separated from their parents. Naturally, this being 2024, the main child character (who is a stand in for all of the British children who were affected by the Blitz) is played by a (half) black child with a white mother. How many (half) black children were there in London in 1940?

    The only true aspect to this is that as far as I can tell, there is no black father in the picture – has there ever been a black man who stuck around to raise his children with a white woman? I have literally never met one. You would think that white women would get the message, or maybe they CHOOSE black men because they don’t really want to be tied down by a white dude who they are going to have to take care of into old age? (BTW, women are the ones who instigate the majority of divorces.)

    •�Replies: @AnotherDad
    @Jack D


    What I do object to is putting blacks into recognizable and contemporary roles where they clearly do not belong. It’s one thing to cast a black dude as Hamlet but another to cast one as Winston Churchill. No one has done that yet but the other day I saw a preview for an upcoming movie called Blitz.
    You're hitting the crux of it Jack.

    I think simply put the hinge is utility versus politics.

    I would very much prefer not to see a black Hamlet. (We now have blacks jammed into our faces and if I'm going to go out to see a play I want a pleasant experience.) But if some troupe has a black actor "who'd be ideal as Hamlet", then they do their play that way. Likewise, if a Chinese troupe decides to put on Shakespeare and ergo all the roles are Chinese--fine. (Again, no interest from me, but fine.)

    But that is not what this modern casting is about. Modern casting is about attacking white normality and rubbing normies noses in it. In blacks. In inter-racial. In homosexuals. It is denying white normies their normality. In making white normies eat it.

    The sassy whip smart black female detective solving all the crimes is not there to entertain--there's no entertainment--but to tell whitey "everything you think about the world is wrong". You're on "the wrong side of history". You don't count. Your days are numbered.

    (At least back in the day Hollyweird Jews pitching their minoritarian morality plays tried to make something entertaining. For example, Columbo, dogged short smart Jewish guy--played as Italian to avoid being too obvious--tracking down evil Wasp murders. LA full of these murderous Wasps wasn't believable, but at least a smart Jewish guy outsmarting some Wasps was believable. Minoritarian fairy tales have gotten more feminine, more homo, more black ... and way dumber.)

    But airdropping these minorities ahistorically into white stories--ex. blacks in Victorian costume drama--is even more vile, more sinister. It isn't just "diversity!" or even "you're on the wrong side of history whitey!" it is a open attack on the idea whites ever had their nations. It is saying "do not even try and think this places was yours".

    Of course, there were essentially no blacks in Britain during the Blitz. Until the American GIs arrived, there were never more than several thousand blacks in all of Britain (0.01% levels). A typical city dweller might go a few weeks or even months without seeing one. Someone in the countryside might live their whole life and never see a single black. Britain was, shockingly ... full of Britons! What has been done to Britain since is nothing short of criminal, genocidal.

    The point of this casting is to give the finger to Britons. "Don't even think this joint was ever yours."

    Replies: @Wokechoke
    , @Jonathan Mason
    @Jack D


    What I do object to is putting blacks into recognizable and contemporary roles where they clearly do not belong. It’s one thing to cast a black dude as Hamlet but another to cast one as Winston Churchill.
    Yup.

    Yesterday I was watching the latest episode of Wolf Hall, a prestigious BBC drama about Tudor times.

    The director had said that in the latest six episodes, which followed 10 years after the previous episodes, that they had decided to use "color blind casting" this time.

    I was thinking that they were lucky that they still had the same actor playing King Henry the 8th as last time, otherwise they might have ended up with a black or Asian actor in that role, or in the role of Thomas Cromwell.

    As it was, they did end up with a couple of cute black chicks hanging around the court of Henry VIII, but none of them became Queens and none of Henry's children turned out to be black.

    I guess the color-blind casting worked out well this time, but next time?

    Replies: @Curle
  354. @Jack D
    @Brutusale

    I don't think deep fake is the right word. It was a fake ad but not at all deep. How hard is it to cut and paste the Aston Martin logo into an ad?

    A deep fake is to paste someone's face (with the correct perspective, facial expression and lip movement) onto another body in every frame of a video and possibly mimic their voice as well, which requires a LOT more processing power.

    Replies: @Ministry Of Tongues, @Jenner Ickham Errican
  355. @Johann Ricke
    @Twinkie


    “The Byzantines” called themselves Romaioi, a term I always found amusing, it being “Romans” in Greek, rather than Latin.
    What I don't get is why they did not simply call themselves Greeks. It's not as if there were no precedent for Greek empire.

    Replies: @anon

    Duh. Because they were the real Romans. Have you not read the articles by Laurent Guyenot and First millennium revisionist on this site?

    The Italian romans were the copycats.

  356. According to Pelosi, gun culture is just a rural thing, but I’m here to tell you that’s flat-out wrong.

  357. @The Spiritual Works of Mercy

    I was wondering if you could do that when it matters... As it matters in battle.
    -Braveheart
    A lot has changed since 2000. Such as the idea common among the average man, that if he worked hard enough, he could become a gladiator, which is what watching UFC does to him. A point that may be worth making is that it is not what watching boxing does to him.

    Gladiators do something more primordial than war, but not till training for war became sport did what gladiators do come to mind. One thing that comes to mind watching the UFC is how ugly brute violence is. It is not sexy (as a girl just said to me). And though he is the original Sexiest Man Alive, I know no more brute depiction of what the first war must have looked like than that scene of Mel Gibson with a hatchet in The Patriot. (Except maybe that scene with baseball bats at the end of Casino.)

    That reminds me, you never hear a father say, "I hope my son becomes a soldier." A good father always fights to keep his son out of war, like in The Patriot. (Or like Hutton Gibson, who moved his family to Australia to keep Mel out of Vietnam.) Yet there is that quote that says a soldier is what every man who was not wishes he had been. Father and Son should ever get together on the issue beforehand, and agree that what will never be regretted is attaining a true soldier's discipline.

    The difference between someone who attains such discipline and someone who knows he should, but does not, would seem to be a matter of another "d word": DRIVE.

    That is what they will tell you our most elite warriors have. We used to debate who would win, a UFC fighter or a Navy SEAL. The real fantasy fight though is this: who is the greatest SEAL. That we do not know. But it seems like we should.

    We are left then to debate the question of who would be the greatest SEAL. Which, in my opinion, lends a new prism through which to discuss the recurring topic of just how great Michael Jordan was. More than the size of his hands or how high he could jump or his overall athleticism, it was Jordan's drive that really set him above the competition. But whence did it come?

    I have a friend that knows of these things who said that what people did not understand about Allen Iverson's famous rant against practice is that he was not saying practice is not a big deal, he was saying that NBA practices are what they are: a joke. You see, basketball is a sport for very, very tall people, and very tall people who can jump high (or people who are freakishly quick, live Iverson). It is not a skill sport, like baseball or hockey; it is not a sport where there is as much of a sense that it is hard work that pays off. As Kobe Bryant said, for most players, "It's a job"--- that is, not something they are especially driven to do. The movie is called For Love of the Game but the truth is that one reason basketball lacks the literary tradition of baseball is because its players lack the love that makes special moments when the game has become just a job, when some vet can relieve the quotidian by some pearl won out of gratitude for the blessing of doing what he loves for a living. As fate would have it, the player whose reminiscences for his playing days have proven to be the most valuable as a literary trove are those of Allen Iverson.

    The point though is this, that Jordan's drive was not a product of a competitive environment; it was not something that survived a test—it was something he always had. Drive is manifest in work ethic, and the way to put it would not be to say Jordan outworked everyone else, because that implies everyone else was working hard. Rather, the way to say it is that Jordan rose above the competition and set his own standard, which was somewhere close to as much as he could do. The fact that he came to the game with this drive makes him more of a natural than the players who learned what it takes to be great from his example. To be a natural who works hard is a very special thing to be.

    What specifically drove Jordan has been much publicized. The extent of his own insight was that he needed other people to challenge him to maintain the motivation that propelled him. But basketball is sport not war, and Jordan never found the appropriate vocabulary for what exactly his driving instinct was. No, he never did. When he spoke of it he sounded like he was expressing some kind of an underdog complex. Why did he care what Jeff Van Gundy thought about him? He thought the fact that attacks motivated him is what made him great, he understood that, but it was as though he never really knew what he was. Rather than someone who always felt like the underdog, or came to understand that he always needed to feel like the underdog, the psychology of Michael Jordan would more correctly be labeled a King Complex, or a conquerors temperament: his was the natural reaction of a king that is besieged. David Halberstam's biography was titled Playing for Keeps but it should have been called King of the Hill. As far as I know, Jordan had not the habit of referring to his competitors or his critics as his "enemies," though that is certainly what they were to him in his gut. What Jordan might have realized in that regard is that he felt a lot like King David, who so often expressed, and so trenchantly articulated, what it feels like to want to have your enemies destroyed.

    And how was he to his teammates?

    One of the stories that came out in The Jordan Rules was what Bill Cartwright said he would do to Jordan if Jordan did not stop riding him. He said he would break his legs. As far as we know, Cartwright was the only person who ever said such a thing to Jordan.* Of course, Cartwright was a veteran and a seven footer. Maybe the point though is that Jordan was even riding him.

    That is what they always used to say, that he would "ride" them. And that is what you saw in The Last Dance, the ten-part behind-the-scenes documentary that came out in 2020 during the covid lockdown. The way Jordan treated his teammates, that (they say) is why it took such a long time to get him to agree to allow the 500 hours of original footage to be shaped up into a series and released. He does not seem to be comfortable with that side of himself. Nor does he seem to really understand it.

    In the first round of the 98 playoffs, the Bulls played the Nets, who were coached by John Calipari. The coaching style of Phil Jackson, especially as he aged, was famously placid. Calipari's was not. He stayed up at the side line, animating his opinion of every bit of the game with the fervor of one who either does not realize he looks a little unhinged or of one who enjoys being a little unhinged. Then came the hour of judgment that I suspect he has not forgotten since.

    Jordan was standing at mid court with his hands on his hips staring at Calipari as Calipari was yelling something at his players, all animated. Then Calipari realized Jordan was staring at him. Eyes met, and Jordan shook his head, then just looked away. This was something of a moment of clarity for Calipari, he came to himself, and later said something like he did not want any more of that look ever again. He was calmer after that.

    The question is, what was Jordan, who would ride his teammates so hard, what exactly was he shaking his head at?

    The 92 Olympics in Barcelona may have been Jordan's most graceful moment. Barkley led the team in scoring, and made a point of dominating the foreigners, even though in America they were not. Steve has described Barkley's schtick as the stuff of a “charming rogue” and Barkley probably is, but there is a side of him that either does not know his own strength or is just a typical bully, and Jordan once took note of this in a reflection on the 92 games. Jordan said Barkley had been the "ugly American," he had been that when he should have realized that the foreigners were rather in awe of them. He should have been as gracious as Jordan was to those who were rather more like children in comparison.

    We are always more honest when we are judging ourselves than when we are judging others, but if you keep the notion of projection in mind, you can learn a lot about a person by remembering who is really being described when someone is judging others, especially if they are making a particularly insightful judgement of them. These two judgments by Jordan of Calipari and of Barkley are basically the same judgment, but each teach us about Jordan in their own way.

    When he was asked about his particular style of leadership, Jordan actually broke down and cried, and said he was always only trying to bring out the best in them. What he should have said, however, is this: "It was the only thing I knew."

    They say we are unaware of our most conspicuous traits. If that is true, in general at least, then it is also true that we are even less aware of why we are the way we are. For example, it is almost certain that Michael Jordan does not know that the reason he cries the way he does is because he was taught not to cry. And he was probably taught that by his older brother Larry, who we know from the accounts of their father is who would be beat Michael mercilessly on the basketball court in the backyard of their home in Wilmington when he was a little boy. Beat him at basketball, that is. But mercilessly. Imagine that. It was all he knew.

    Childhood trauma is most usefully thought of as something we all experience, but which each of us experience more or less. We seem to know that certain trauma in early childhood makes those children a certain way as adults. But the same trauma does different things to different people. Being traumatized by someone you admire is different than being traumatized by someone you hate, or someone you are mostly afraid of, or are very afraid of. And do not forget that we are speaking about children; it is obviously much harder to traumatize an adult.

    When The Last Dance came out, critics opined that all that riding teammates Jordan did in his playing days was probably not necessary. That is almost certainly true. What also seems almost certainly true is that Michael Jordan should ride the little rich white kids that go to his camps, he should push them and yell at them and never show them mercy, instead of joking around with them and being kind to them and leaving them more spoiled than when they got there. In short, he should do to them what his big brother did to him. And he should make sure they know not to cry.

    You will hear them tell you to get in touch with your "inner child." True, to a man, nothing could sound more soft-headed. But I would submit that there is more Biblical wisdom in that idea than he has who thinks he is wise and still watches, as a kid does at least, a child's game. Maybe the reason Michael Jordan conceived of himself as an underdog was, after all, more revealing of the truth of who he is than we have been able to see: that he conceived of himself that way because he is still at heart that little boy in the backyard who never got used to getting pushed around.

    Of course, Jordan was, as they say, The Man--- but he was a man who apparently did not know what fuel there was to be found in the word of God for a king like him. And, alas, nor did he make it a point of thanking God for all he had been given by Him. As mom would say, David didn't make that shot against Goliath: God did.

    In this culture of hero-worship of athletes, we could at least expect them to do what is right when it comes time to talk. No one tunes in to hear them talk but it is always a little fun to hear what they say, and some of them do get it right by beginning and ending by giving glory to God. We are not sure if they are even good for anything else, anything besides drawing the public's attention to how much the greatest owe their Creator.

    In between thanking God and glorifying Him, these athletes, and the number one athlete in particular, could not do better than remember who every boy owes the most to, his father. And for all the many athletes who never met or don’t really know theirs, they might do well to consider in that regard who else they never met but still owe everything to. Honoring your father is a commandment that God did not qualify. There is always a gracious thing to do, even, or especially when, it is only gracious.

    Yes, fathers and their sons. What more is sports about? What more are they really for? I was not born when Jordan made that shot against Georgetown to win the national championship, and I did not see the iconic buzzer beater on Craig Ehlo in 89. But I did see the shot that won ring number six in 98 against the Jazz. Witnessing it though is only still a special memory to me for one reason. Which is that my father showed up right before it happened and got to watch it with me. I was in the basement, on the edge of my seat, when Dad came down quite unexpectedly. I don't remember if he woke up or could not sleep that night but it was the first time he had ever joined me to watch a late-night game. Mind you I considered myself at the time the biggest Michael Jordan fan in the world, never mind what anyone else said, I knew that's what I was.

    We had mentioned before about a (relative) lack of the love of the game of basketball among its players, just about all of whom were more born to play than love to play. To that point, Occam's Razor regarding why Jordan quit basketball and went into baseball is this: he did that because, as he had always said, baseball was his favorite sport. He loved most what he was not as good at. I suppose God often does that to us, in this life, anyway.

    But one thing Jordan did love is why he was the most clutch player of all time, and probably that across all sports, ever. (He really was something.) What he loved was the spotlight. Which is to be distinguished from Fame. That he always seems to have hated. He hated it so much that he retired at the height of it. But the spotlight, that are those moments when the game has a chance to be won, and you know everyone knows it is all about you. Yes, Michael Jordan loved those moments. He lived for those moments. And he was worthy enough at what he did best to make those moments memories. Good for him. (Now, thank God!)

    Can you acquire a love of the spotlight? I don't know. Nor do I know what it is like to be in a fire fight. But I know Hemingway said it is about being graceful: "Courage is grace under fire." That though might, that might be ridiculous. For example, when I went out for water polo in college the coach told me that I had a very long and pretty stroke but that in the sport of water polo it was about taking short, choppy strokes. He who is graceful on a battlefield is probably not aware that he is being like a ballerina, not a warrior. Hemingway had the right idea but not the right word (even if grace is not exactly the wrong word.) The sniper in Saving Private Ryan is not graceful---he is serene. NBA players may look graceful on the court even when they are scared, but in the big moments only the special players are serene.

    Now back to that night in the basement with my Dad. He came down, and then Jordan pulled the move and made the shot, and Bob Costas called him The King, and the greatest ending any athlete ever had to their sports career was in the books, and almost perfect--- almost perfect, for, as Michael Wilbon noted, it wasn't a buzzer beater and it wasn't game seven. Indeed, though, almost perfect. Dad said, "It was a great move."

    There was more though--and alas for that. Even though I thought I was his biggest fan in the world, I did not want Michael Jordan to come back and play for my hometown team. That, too, I suppose, is about my father. Who has instilled in me a patrimony that could be distilled down to one thing and one reminder: the one true faith is the thing, and the reminder is his own way of stating the importance of final perseverance: what he always said to me was "Finish strong."

    You are always supposed to finish strong.

    Which brings us to the end of this piece. One time I got caught in a bar talking about Michael Jordan like I knew him, next to some guys who knew better than to do that. I was talking about the time Jordan made a joke about the difference between Dean Smith and Bobby Knight, but one way of putting what I had done in that bar is just to say that I like my little brother's name. The meaning of which, if you didn't know, is a question: Who is like God? It is a name that kind of makes you wonder, does it not?

    This year was the year that, in the footsteps of St Francis, I observed for the first time St Michael's Lent. Every day I prayed St Michael's litany, and about that I can report this, that I have never felt more spiritually inspired than praying that litany made me feel in those moments of prayer.

    At that time shall Michael rise up, the great prince, who standeth for the children of thy people.
    I used to own a VHS about Michael Jordan that was so old the picture of him on the box is from when he still had hair. Yeah, he was younger then than he is now. And so was I. The VHS includes footage of his father, who does not seem like he was a hard man, and in the footage, he was talking about God, actually. And I remember one thing he said. He said, "Michael was born to do one thing." One thing.

    But what did you do with your talent?




    *Cartwright came to the Bulls in a trade for Charles Oakley, who had been Jordan's protector, he was known as his "enforcer." The Bulls needed a center when they made the trade, but knowing how they were, you kind of get the sense that management might have traded Oakley out of some unpublished spite. Him and Jordan, they were supposed to stay together (maybe only to grow apart as men). What might have been? We can only imagine. Possibly two more championships, the ones that went to the Bad Boys instead. The Jordan Rules were operative because the Reign of Oakley was not an option.

    Replies: @Lugash

    One of the stories that came out in The Jordan Rules was what Bill Cartwright said he would do to Jordan if Jordan did not stop riding him. He said he would break his legs. As far as we know, Cartwright was the only person who ever said such a thing to Jordan.* Of course, Cartwright was a veteran and a seven footer. Maybe the point though is that Jordan was even riding him.

    Jayson Williams said in a magazine interview way back that Jordan was one of the hardest players in the NBA; he was all smiles and I like Mike in the public but if you angered him he would find you after the game and put your ass on the floor.

  358. Original Wheel of Fortune game show host, (and others) Chuck Woolery, RIP, age 83

    Per a recent online news source:

    After his long TV career ended, Woolery went into podcasting. He called himself a gun-rights activist and a conservative libertarian and constitutionalist, saying he hadn’t revealed his politics in liberal Hollywood for fear of retribution. He teamed up with Mark Young in 2014 for the podcast Blunt Force Truth and soon became a full supporter of Donald Trump. “President Obama’s popularity is a fantasy only held by him and his dwindling legion of juice-box-drinking, anxiety-dog-hugging, safe-space-hiding snowflakes,” he said.

    He was an original Hollywood exile.

  359. @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Your side hates Russia because it is a big white country that intends to stay that way. And your side especially hates it for being anti-gay/trans.

    Oddly, although I don't think Sailer and Cochran are queer, they both seem to have the same antipathy toward healthy heterosexual male assertiveness that queers do.

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar

    And your side especially hates it for being anti-gay/trans.

    That “gay/trans” is a “thing” at all is a completely white man’s phenomenon. Even the most tolerant non-whites, e.g. Thais, merely carve out a “safe space” for what are viewed as a thin sliver of harmless nuts. “Equality” and celebration are as white as white gets.

    So the Russians have more in common with Africans than with their “fellow” Europeans, who have mostly all swallowed the pink pill. Where is your racial loyalty? “If it’s white, it must be right!”

    the same antipathy toward healthy heterosexual male assertiveness that queers do.

    Barging into an online forum to announce that the whole of three thousand years of moral philosophy is meaningless, and that only you– and a few “uncontacted” tribes in the wilderness– have the answer is certainly assertive. Few would call it “healthy”.

    Your side hates Russia because it is a big white country that intends to stay that way.

    By annexing Ukraine to balance these? The non-white part is actually bigger, by area.

    [MORE]


    •�Replies: @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality
    @Reg Cæsar

    Does it ever bother you that you use the compassion and humanity of white people as a weapon to destroy them?
    , @Mike Tre
    @Reg Cæsar

    “That “gay/trans” is a “thing” at all is a completely white man’s phenomenon.”

    This of course, is complete and utter bullshit.
  360. @Jack D
    @Anon

    That's ridiculous. The blacks who are into the Hotep/We Wuz Kangs stuff are also the blacks who are the most anti-Semitic and the ones who are most detached from mainstream and academic media sources.

    Getting rid of Joos is not the all purpose solution to all of America's ills that the Men of Unz seem to think it is. You will still have your blacks (which BTW YOU and not the Jews brought here) and they will be just as troublesome as they have been for the last 400 years.

    If blacks are less troublesome in other countries it is because WASPs were always wooly headed and had a soft spot in their bleeding hearts for them and for every other type of loser. Was there ever any equivalent of the New England abolitionist movement in Brazil?

    Replies: @Mark G., @AnotherDad, @Curle, @newrouter

    Was there ever any equivalent of the New England abolitionist movement

    There were different varieties of abolitionist including the free them so they aren’t compelled to flee North abolitionists.

  361. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    @Reg Cæsar

    Charlemagne should be compared with the founding Abbasid Caliph-- al-Manṣūr (714 to 775), who undertook this effort:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graeco-Arabic_translation_movement

    Though where are the data for comparison?
    The Muslims had papermaking for three centuries earlier, and transmitted it to Europe.

    Early Middle Ages was 5 to 10th CE, how much venacular literature did the West produce in this period? Much less in Latin and Greek. Beowulf is dated to 975.

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/24/European_Output_of_Manuscripts_500%E2%80%931500.png

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval_literature

    You missed this gem?

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/2c/My_Life_Bill_Clinton.jpg

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @songbird

    Charlemagne should be compared with the founding Abbasid Caliph– al-Manṣūr

    This is just quibbling over populations with perhaps 5% literacy vs 10%. How many could read in Persia? China? The Subcontinent? Japan?

    The Muslims had papermaking for three centuries earlier…

    Which they got from China, the way they got their math from India. Much of the credit for their “golden age” belongs to ethnic and religious minorities under their rule.

  362. @YetAnotherAnon
    @Wokechoke

    To be fair, we Brits started the bombing of Germany before they started bombing us. It was on a relatively light scale, because we only had light bombers like Hampdens with small bomb loads.

    But ... Germany had already bombed central Rotterdam pretty flat, on May 13 1940, before the RAF started bombing German cities. (The picture is after they'd cleared the rubble and probably pulled down seriously damaged buildings).

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/61/Rotterdam%2C_Laurenskerk%2C_na_bombardement_van_mei_1940.jpg

    Replies: @Older Palo Altan

    The destruction of Rotterdam was briefly mourned by the families which had ruled the city financially ands politically for centuries. Once the decencies had been observed however they rejoiced: a modern city (and port) could now be built to rival and surpass anything the rest of Europe could offer. So eager were they to start from scratch that even the St Laurence Church (shown in this haunting photo) came within a whisker of being demolished. Today it sits, superbly restored, in the middle of the ugliest city centre in Europe.

    The port, on the other hand, is admittedly magnificent.

    •�Thanks: Almost Missouri
  363. @Bardon Kaldian
    OT- Ukraine

    I just watched Piers Morgan for fun. This time, it was about Russian war in Ukraine. For any person with IQ higher than room temperature & maturity more than that of a spoiled child, matters are obvious just from this clip.

    The oldest guest is a retired general, a cautious man who actually didn't say anything worth remembering.

    Then, it is Jake Broe, a strong supporter of Ukraine whom I respect & may disagree only on the strategy vs tactics issues. But his heart & mind are in the right place.

    Then you got two MAGA types, Benny and Scott, who are not just infantile, but they cannot behave. They are jumpy, hysterical & ill mannered. They are certainly not Russian bots, but Jake is, and here I agree with him, rightly says that there is some "homoerotic fixation" with Putin on the Trumpist side.

    This entertainment is not something serious; you don't have nuances analyses etc. But for any mentally sane & normal person, it is obvious who is right- and who is wrong.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VPsMhYye7Uo

    Replies: @Old Prude, @J.Ross, @Mr. Anon

    The oldest guest is a retired general, a cautious man who actually didn’t say anything worth remembering.

    Probably how he made General.

    This entertainment is not something serious; you don’t have nuances analyses etc. But for any mentally sane & normal person, it is obvious who is right- and who is wrong.

    Yes, Piers Morgan, or his producers, picked the guests who would reinforce the image they wish to convey. You chose sane, rational exponents of the view you wish to promote, and unhinged, not-so-bright exponents of the view you wish to defame. It’s the oldest trick in the media playbook.

    And you fell for it.

    •�Agree: Old Prude
    •�Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
    @Mr. Anon

    Piers Morgan invited Jeffrey Sachs who embarrassed himself with his positions on Gaza and Ukraine. And Sachs is considered by many "an expert". Piers also had John Mearsheimer, another intellectual Russia apologist.

    So, I don't think your Piers- Machiavel manipulator theory holds water.

    Replies: @Mr. Anon
  364. @Mike Tre
    @Mr. Anon

    Bullshit. Shakespeare is historical, and negrofying his work is an absolutely a rewrite of history. You're Ok with the current negrofication Nordic mythology and Tolkien's works?

    Replies: @Mr. Anon

    You’re Ok with the current negrofication Nordic mythology and Tolkien’s works?

    No, because I view those as decidedly ethnic in nature.

    But you may have me in a double-standard there.

    •�Thanks: Mike Tre
  365. @Isabel Archer
    @Je Suis Omar Mateen

    What are FMPs? A Google search doesn't explain this acronym.

    Replies: @Je Suis Omar Mateen

    “What are FMPs? A Google search doesn’t explain this acronym.”

    [Breed] Me Pumps

    F**k Me Pumps

  366. @AnotherDad
    @Jack D

    Yes and no.

    The blacks who are into the Hotep/We Wuz Kangs stuff are also the blacks who are the most anti-Semitic and the ones who are most detached from mainstream and academic media sources.
    Obviously, blacks are quite capable of ginning up all sorts we wuz kangs nonsense on their own. See Elijah Muhammed.

    But mainstream society humoring and worse elite institutions parroting this crap was essentially non-existent until the rise of the Jews pushing minoritarianism, centering big bad whitey's "oppression" as the core American narrative--and font of virtue/status for the "oppressed"--using blacks' experience of slavery, Jim Crow--Jews own "oppression" in America being too trivial for anyone to take seriously--as the cudgel to beat on and delegitimate whitey, majoritarian republicanism, America.

    And no, I don't have to make this up, because Jewish leaders always go and trot out the great black-Jewish alliance (of resisting evil whitey's oppression) whenever they need to get the rambunctious negros back on side (i.e. supporting what Jews want to do).

    If blacks are less troublesome in other countries it is because WASPs were always wooly headed and had a soft spot in their bleeding hearts for them and for every other type of loser. Was there ever any equivalent of the New England abolitionist movement in Brazil?
    It's the WASPs!

    Abolition drew on some strains of Christian do-gooder utopianism, that have to be checked in the real world. But abolition of slavery is of course a good thing and unsurprising that WASPs were at the forefront of it.

    The West was on a strong upward trajectory--Christianity, abolishing serfdom, modern science, technological advance, movement toward republican equality. The sort of "we're all in this together" human progress easier to get in more one-peopleish nations unburdened by too much caste diversity or tedious middle-man minorities. Slavery was serious backstep for the West, that came with encountering primitive peoples along with opportunity to exploit new raw land. The siren call of "cheap labor!" to make big profits was too great. It was goodness that there were WASPs who wanted to steer the West back on track--and help stamp out this scourge world wide. Of course, these sentiments were not unique to Anglos, lots of Christian folks wished to rid themselves of slavery. Brazil--the biggest slave state in the New World--with a different, Catholic, culture abolished slavery a generation later (and without a big war). The huge difficulty, of course, was that we could not put the ink back in the bottle--reverse the 1619 mistake.

    Far from "wooly headed" the salient philosophical/ideological characteristics of WASPs--Anglos--has been "empiricism". They went out into the world and observed what actually existed--studied it, tried to figure out what was going on. They might argue for a generation, but the guy who was backed up with the data would win the Royal Society debate in the end. Anglos dealt with the world as it is. And--generally--did stuff that worked. The Anglo nations used to be some of the best places on earth to live.

    It was Jews--not WASPs--who cooked up all this anti-empirical, thoroughly "wooly headed" "race does not exist" nonsense. It was your boys like Stephen J. Gould or Richard Lewontin doing the old Jewish "I yap therefore it is true" fantasizing (lying)--not their WASPy antagonists James Watson or E.O. Wilson mired in empirical reality. (And likewise with all the anti-IQ stuff on the psychology side. Anglo empiricism and progress, versus Jewish anti-scientific fantasizing, obfuscating and lying.)

    One need only compare the trajectory of America under the WASPs versus with the post-coup "under new management" regime. The sad reality is American Jews--given such an incredible opportunity by America--have been extremely destructive--ideologically, culturally, politically--to the American nation. And through dominance--and willingness to shout their lies louder--of American academia and media flooded the rest of the West, and to a lesser extent the world with their anti-empirical nonsense and minoritarian bilge.

    But we get it. You're a Jew. Jews good. Nobel Prizes, sunshine and blue skies. It's the "wooly headed" WASPs.

    Replies: @Jack D, @Anonymous

    Is your ”gentiles dindoo nuffin” framing really “Anglo empiricism”? Because it sure sounds a lot more like you are projecting your own ethnic favoritism on to Jews.
    https://quillette.com/2018/03/15/alt-right-gets-wrong-jews/

  367. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    @Reg Cæsar

    Charlemagne should be compared with the founding Abbasid Caliph-- al-Manṣūr (714 to 775), who undertook this effort:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graeco-Arabic_translation_movement

    Though where are the data for comparison?
    The Muslims had papermaking for three centuries earlier, and transmitted it to Europe.

    Early Middle Ages was 5 to 10th CE, how much venacular literature did the West produce in this period? Much less in Latin and Greek. Beowulf is dated to 975.

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/24/European_Output_of_Manuscripts_500%E2%80%931500.png

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval_literature

    You missed this gem?

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/2c/My_Life_Bill_Clinton.jpg

    Replies: @Reg Cæsar, @songbird

    The Muslims had papermaking for three centuries earlier, and transmitted it to Europe

    Yellow River Valley wins again!

    But wasn’t it the Muslims preventing commerce with China?

    •�Replies: @Roger-Lodge
    @songbird

    Muslims via the Turks are the ones who destroyed the Silk Road. It prevented trade from Europe with India and China. It's the exact reason why Christopher Columbus sailed West in hope of reaching India so that they could resume trade in black pepper among other things..

    Replies: @Colin Wright
  368. @Mr. Anon
    @Mike Tre

    Shakespeare is drama, not history. It is typically held to a different standard of realism. If a black actor is cast as Julius Caesar or Macbeth in those plays, I don't mind, as long as he turns in a good performance.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Mike Tre, @Curle

    If a black actor is cast as Julius Caesar or Macbeth in those plays, I don’t mind

    I’ve seen that too and by the end of the play the initial irritation at having to use extra imagination disappears as long as the actors don’t change sex and they don’t adopt some patois speech pattern. When it comes to women playing major male characters the play is ruined. I saw a version of The Tempest where they made Prospero a woman and it was a discretionary decision not one arrived at by necessity. Ruined the play for me and made me wonder at the tolerance of early play goers who watched men in female roles. I realize it was a convention they expected and that Twelfth Night makes it part of the play, still . . .

  369. @Mr. Anon
    @AnotherDad

    As you note, Vance is articulate - which Trump is not. Vance is also smart - which Trump is not. At least he seldom gives much evidence for it.

    But Vance may very well also be a rather slippery character. Vance owes his business and political career to the patronage of the gay German billionaire, Peter Thiel. You want to talk minoritarianism - that's three minority groups right there. As billionaire oligarchs go, Thiel is probably not the worst. But he is a billionaire oligarch and I don't trust him, nor do I necessarily trust one of his creations.

    We'll see what they do.

    One thing the incoming Trump administration should do is start doing something tangible for the people who put them in office. Back in 2017, Steve Bannon wanted to enact a large-scale federal infrastructure project that would put money into the hands of blue collar workers, especially in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. Presumably in some reliably Red states as well. That was scotched by Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell and the rest of the Republican establishment (way to go, guys).

    There are a lot of things that need fixing in America. The Trump administration should try to fix some of them. If they don't, then Vance or whoever runs to succeed Trump in 2028 will have nobody but themselves to blame.

    Replies: @AnotherDad, @Truth, @Curle

    Vance owes his business and political career to the patronage of the gay German billionaire, Peter Thiel.

    A detail made less alarming by the fact that Thiel is in the business of incubating businesses which in a very simple way means he’s a talent scout and in an even simpler formulation means he’s made it his business to promote lots of people the vast majority not being gay I’d venture. Whether these people feel obligated to the gay cause because of Thiel’s support I do not know. It is also the case that closeted or non-evangelizing (to the gay rights position) gays have always a large and hidden part of the Republican Party organizational structure. Trump, for instance, was himself reliant in many ways on gay New York anti-communist lawyer Roy Cohn. I believe Nixon may have leaned on Cohn as well.

  370. @Jack D
    @Brutusale

    I don't think deep fake is the right word. It was a fake ad but not at all deep. How hard is it to cut and paste the Aston Martin logo into an ad?

    A deep fake is to paste someone's face (with the correct perspective, facial expression and lip movement) onto another body in every frame of a video and possibly mimic their voice as well, which requires a LOT more processing power.

    Replies: @Ministry Of Tongues, @Jenner Ickham Errican

    I don’t think deep fake is the right word.

    Fascinating, but Brutusale didn’t write “deep fake”. Slow down and read it again.

    •�Replies: @Jack D
    @Jenner Ickham Errican

    It's not a proto deep fake either,

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican
  371. •�Thanks: epebble
    •�Replies: @epebble
    @JohnnyWalker123

    The water is not that old, since the oldest rock on earth is 4 billion years old. However, there is this scientific curiosity:

    Possibly the oldest material on Earth is found in the Murchison meteorite. Tiny silicon carbide grains in the meteorite are thought to be particles of interstellar dust dated to 7 billion years old – 2.5 billion years older than the Sun itself!
    https://www.usgs.gov/centers/astrogeology-science-center/news/happy-old-rock-day

    7 billion years is nearly half of the age of the universe!
  372. @Dmon
    @Odyssey

    Hey - Belisarius was born in what was then Pannonia, which included parts of modern day Bulgaria and Hungary. If you're retroactively turning Illyrians into Serbians, then I can call Belisarius a Hungarian.

    You have to admit though - Belisarius doesn't look at all Serbian. Here's Johnny Miljus, ace reliever for the 1927 Pirates, who lost the World Series to the Ruth-Gehrig "Murderer's Row" Yankees in 4 straight. His nickname was "The Big Serb", a century before Jokic.
    https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/--sAAOSwQx9kekeD/s-l400.jpg

    Here's Dr. Slobodan Cuk, longtime head of the Power Electronics Curriculum at Cal Tech, and inventor of the Cuk Converter, advertised as "the optimum topology DC-DC converter" due to it's zero output ripple properties (you have to tweak the leakage inductance of the coupled inductor just s0 though). He is an ardent Serb0phile, and named his company Teslaco. He looks alot more like Slobodan Milosevic than he does like Belisarius.
    https://teslaco.us/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/bio-pic-01-243x300.jpg

    Also, Justinian's wife was a whore. And apparently a damn good one. But that doesn't make her Indo-Jamaican.

    Replies: @Odyssey

    Thanks for the information about Johnny Miljus, which almost no one here knows about since we don’t even consider baseball a sport. All that chewing tobacco, spitting, and scrambling the balls, and all that in nothing less than the World Series (with Cubans), lol…give me a break. The only thing worth remembering in baseball was Geena Davis’ split in A League of Their Own.

    I see that you have a sincere desire to learn, so I’ll tell you right away that you’re in the right place and in safe hands. Just stick with me and you’ll have access to a treasure trove of knowledge. For starters, look at #206. I know, you know that Justinian was a Serb (Panzer Tre immediately got lost after expressing his doubts and didn’t have the courage to speculate what else he could be, since there’s simply no other option). Later we’ll uncover another major Panzer forgery in this thread. If you are of Hungarian descent, just say so, I have interesting things for you.

    You’re probably an electro-guy if you know Slobodan Čuk (his last name means night (or small) owl, in Serbian). I had the opportunity to hear one of his lectures. Otherwise, he was one of many Serbian professors (e.g. Šiljak, Santa Clara) who laid the foundations of NASA (also Cisco). So, it’s not just basketball players who come there. He taught at CalTech but despite his tenure, he was fired in 1999 along with the beginning of the bombing of Serbia.

    He has several inventions and his Ćuk converter is famous. The Illyrians were Serbs and you probably know that there are at least two basic types of Serbs, Dinarides and Pannonians. Dinarides are mountain types, with long limbs, thin and tough, according to wiki they are the tallest people in the world, have a predisposition for sports (e.g. NBA), while Pannonians are plains dwellers.

    Here are two Dinarides for you (40 sec):

    •�Replies: @Odyssey
    @Odyssey

    That's what I was talking about:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQPf9EKjasU
  373. @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @Jack D


    I don’t think deep fake is the right word.
    Fascinating, but Brutusale didn’t write “deep fake”. Slow down and read it again.

    Replies: @Jack D

    It’s not a proto deep fake either,

    •�Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @Jack D


    It’s not a proto deep fake either
    How so? Do you not know what proto- means?

    Replies: @Jack D
  374. •�Agree: TWS
  375. @Jack D
    @Jenner Ickham Errican

    It's not a proto deep fake either,

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican

    It’s not a proto deep fake either

    How so? Do you not know what proto- means?

    •�Replies: @Jack D
    @Jenner Ickham Errican

    Yes, it is not even a primitive deep fake. A proto deep fake would be something like the famous photo of Stalin with Yezhov edited out of the picture:

    https://assets.editorial.aetnd.com/uploads/2018/04/nikolai-yezhov-pictured-right-of.jpg

    But this was not any sort of "deep fake" at all, just a counterfeit use of a logo which is not the same category.

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @David In TN
  376. @Peter Akuleyev
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    And the chieftain of that battle became the symbol of German nationalism, of liberation against rapacious Roman invaders, didn’t he?

    A millenium after the fact based on some Germans reading Tacitus. No German folk memory of Arminius survived over the intervening centuries. There is no real evidence that any of the other German tribes saw Arminius as some sort of pan-Germanic hero even during the centuries immediately after the event.

    Replies: @Prester John, @anon, @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms, @Odyssey

    When the Goths showed up, who we know for a fact spoke a Germanic language…

    Incorrect!

    No German folk memory of Arminius survived over the intervening centuries. There is no real evidence that any of the other German tribes saw Arminius as some sort of pan-Germanic hero even during the centuries immediately after the event.

    Why has no German folk memory of Arminius survived over the intervening centuries? Simply put, it is due to another instance of historical reinterpretation. Arminius belonged to the Cherusci tribe, which, according to Wikipedia, is described as a Germanic tribe that lived in the area of modern-day Hanover.

    This, however, is inaccurate. At that time, the so-called Germanic tribes did not inhabit present-day Germany. More precisely, while they can be classified as “Germanic,” they are not the ancestors of modern Germans (except for a segment of assimilated Serbs). In the 18th century, Serbian was still spoken around Hanover.

    It is misleading that Tacitus’ term Germani is almost universally equated with modern Germans. Such confusion persists because modern Germans lack a clear understanding of their history, including the details of their migration from Asia and the historical origins of the term Germani. This name, which some associate with the Serbs as ancient inhabitants of present-day Germany, has become a source of misinterpretation.

    This issue parallels a comment by Panzer Tre #305 regarding the Greeks. Similarly, the Greeks migrated to Europe (from the Middle East/Africa) and claimed lands from the native Serbs, who originally gave them their name—Greeks, a name Greeks have largely avoided using due to its slightly derogatory connotation.

    Wiki says:
    “The Cherusci were a Germanic tribe that inhabited parts of the plains and forests of northwestern Germania in the area of the Weser River and present-day Hanover during the first centuries BC and AD. Roman sources reported they considered themselves kin with other Irmino tribes.”

    Historical maps depict Arminius’ tribe, the Cherusci, surrounded by Serbian tribes, such as the Suebi (which Wikipedia also wrongly classifies as a Germanic tribe). The German province of Swabia even derives its name from the Suebi. Unfortunately, German historical narratives are riddled with distortions, and what is even more troubling is the apparent lack of remorse for such fabrications, often overshadowed by a certain arrogance.

    [MORE]

    According to a late 8th c. source, Luneburg (in locum qui dicitur Hluini) was considered part of the great Serbian confederation centered in northeast Germania, the renowned Lutici of Luticiorum: Liunniburc quoque oppidum maximum Ottonis duds Saxonici, situm in confinio Saxonum et Luticiorum, 795. :

    https://www.unz.com/article/the-saddest-story-never-told/?showcomments#comment-6651779

    There are a few hundred Serbian toponyms, here is just one of them:
    Bavendorp (Lüneburg) — originated from Babin‘s dorf (Babin’s = Grandma’s, in Serbian). So, Bavendorp=Grandma’s village. Lol.

    HANOVER WENDLAND, VENEDICA GENS – As late as the 18th c. one could still hear Serb or Wend-Polab speech (diepolabischer spräche) or Wend Drevani speech (wendischer spräche Drawey) in the Duchy of Luneburg (in den luneburgischen Amtern Dannenburg, Lucho und Wustro), and in the Wendland known as Hanover Wendland or das Hannoversche Wendland (J.H. Schulze, Etwas über den Bezirk und namen des wendischen Pagus Drawn, 1795. O, Koch, Das Hannoverschen Wenderland der de Gau Drawehn, 1898. B. Wächter, Zur politischen Organization der Wendlandischen Slawen vom 8. bis 12.Jahrhundert, 1989)’

    NICHT WORT DIE DEUTSCHEN SPRACHE – Numerous 17th and early 18th century sources note that in some rural areas the sounds of German speech were seldom heard or understood: Die alten Leutte, weil sie Wendisch, verstehen nicht Wort die deutschen Sprache, will geschweigen den Catehchisimum, 1669.

    WENDEN, GOTTLOSEN – As some Church officials tended to equate German speech with God’s presence, there were even doubts as to God’s existence in Hannoversche Wendland: Von der in Wustrow, Luchow und anderer in orten gesessenen Wenden unvernunfTtigen gewohnheiten und gottlosen Leben, 1671.

    •�Replies: @anon
    @Odyssey


    Tacitus’ term Germani
    You should read what Hochart, Fomenko, Guyenot etc wrote on Tacitus. The articles by Guyenot you can find on this site.

    Tacitus was "discovered" by a known plagiarizer, and his Germanica is written in a completely different style than his (?) other works.
  377. @Jack D
    @YetAnotherAnon


    I do wonder if the brutal treatment of civilian Germans, first by RAF Bomber Command, then by the Red Army, then by the post-war occupation and starvation, hasn’t burned something into the collective German soul.
    Yes, it did. It burned into 99% of them never to follow a mad fascist dictator making promises of German glory into ruin again. From now on stick to making high quality export goods and leave the global adventures to the Americans. Why invade Britain or Poland if you can just sell them BMW's and Mercedes and make good $?

    1% of them were die hard Hitler followers and didn't draw the right lesson.

    Replies: @mc23, @Colin Wright, @YetAnotherAnon, @James B. Shearer

    “Yes, it did. It burned into 99% of them never to follow a mad fascist dictator making promises of German glory into ruin again. …”

    If it was really 99% they wouldn’t need Holocaust denial laws.

    •�Replies: @Jack D
    @James B. Shearer

    The NPD (as close as Germany gets to a neo-Nazi party) has never received more than 5% of the vote and the current estimate of its membership is 3,000 people:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Democratic_Party_of_Germany

    Remember that the Nazi Party itself was once small enough that the entire membership could fit in a beerhall. The best thing to do with fascist movements is to strangle them in their cradle. If you wait until they are large and powerful it may be too late.

    Again I emphasize that free speech laws are somewhat different in Europe. Americans are uncomfortable with the idea of outlawing dangerous ideologies or anything speech related, but Europe doesn't have the same qualms. This is not because they are undemocratic - they just have slightly different traditions. I like our First Amendment but I understand why other nations might balance free speech and the danger to society from extremists in a different way given their history vs ours.

    Replies: @Colin Wright, @Art Deco
  378. @Odyssey
    @Dmon

    Thanks for the information about Johnny Miljus, which almost no one here knows about since we don't even consider baseball a sport. All that chewing tobacco, spitting, and scrambling the balls, and all that in nothing less than the World Series (with Cubans), lol...give me a break. The only thing worth remembering in baseball was Geena Davis' split in A League of Their Own.

    I see that you have a sincere desire to learn, so I'll tell you right away that you're in the right place and in safe hands. Just stick with me and you'll have access to a treasure trove of knowledge. For starters, look at #206. I know, you know that Justinian was a Serb (Panzer Tre immediately got lost after expressing his doubts and didn't have the courage to speculate what else he could be, since there's simply no other option). Later we'll uncover another major Panzer forgery in this thread. If you are of Hungarian descent, just say so, I have interesting things for you.

    You're probably an electro-guy if you know Slobodan Čuk (his last name means night (or small) owl, in Serbian). I had the opportunity to hear one of his lectures. Otherwise, he was one of many Serbian professors (e.g. Šiljak, Santa Clara) who laid the foundations of NASA (also Cisco). So, it's not just basketball players who come there. He taught at CalTech but despite his tenure, he was fired in 1999 along with the beginning of the bombing of Serbia.

    He has several inventions and his Ćuk converter is famous. The Illyrians were Serbs and you probably know that there are at least two basic types of Serbs, Dinarides and Pannonians. Dinarides are mountain types, with long limbs, thin and tough, according to wiki they are the tallest people in the world, have a predisposition for sports (e.g. NBA), while Pannonians are plains dwellers.

    Here are two Dinarides for you (40 sec):
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kp-AW3BO-Cg

    Replies: @Odyssey

    That’s what I was talking about:

  379. @Jack D
    @Anon

    That's ridiculous. The blacks who are into the Hotep/We Wuz Kangs stuff are also the blacks who are the most anti-Semitic and the ones who are most detached from mainstream and academic media sources.

    Getting rid of Joos is not the all purpose solution to all of America's ills that the Men of Unz seem to think it is. You will still have your blacks (which BTW YOU and not the Jews brought here) and they will be just as troublesome as they have been for the last 400 years.

    If blacks are less troublesome in other countries it is because WASPs were always wooly headed and had a soft spot in their bleeding hearts for them and for every other type of loser. Was there ever any equivalent of the New England abolitionist movement in Brazil?

    Replies: @Mark G., @AnotherDad, @Curle, @newrouter

    “(which BTW YOU and not the Jews brought here)”

    lol Revisionist history to make the tribe like “wez didntdo nuthin” with the slave trade to the Americas

  380. @JohnnyWalker123
    https://twitter.com/GlennThrush/status/1860845577669390433

    Replies: @epebble

    The water is not that old, since the oldest rock on earth is 4 billion years old. However, there is this scientific curiosity:

    Possibly the oldest material on Earth is found in the Murchison meteorite. Tiny silicon carbide grains in the meteorite are thought to be particles of interstellar dust dated to 7 billion years old – 2.5 billion years older than the Sun itself!

    https://www.usgs.gov/centers/astrogeology-science-center/news/happy-old-rock-day

    7 billion years is nearly half of the age of the universe!

  381. @Reg Cæsar
    @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality


    And your side especially hates it for being anti-gay/trans.
    That "gay/trans" is a "thing" at all is a completely white man's phenomenon. Even the most tolerant non-whites, e.g. Thais, merely carve out a "safe space" for what are viewed as a thin sliver of harmless nuts. "Equality" and celebration are as white as white gets.

    So the Russians have more in common with Africans than with their "fellow" Europeans, who have mostly all swallowed the pink pill. Where is your racial loyalty? "If it's white, it must be right!"

    the same antipathy toward healthy heterosexual male assertiveness that queers do.
    Barging into an online forum to announce that the whole of three thousand years of moral philosophy is meaningless, and that only you-- and a few "uncontacted" tribes in the wilderness-- have the answer is certainly assertive. Few would call it "healthy".

    Your side hates Russia because it is a big white country that intends to stay that way.
    By annexing Ukraine to balance these? The non-white part is actually bigger, by area.

    https://www.aljazeera.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/AP22129383329879.jpg


    https://i0.wp.com/www.gemmagoesglobal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/IMG_5021-scaled.jpg

    https://www.56thparallel.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/17134_900-min.jpg.webp

    https://optim.tildacdn.one/tild3434-3966-4165-b662-396437393836/-/format/webp/Ethnic.jpg

    Replies: @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality, @Mike Tre

    Does it ever bother you that you use the compassion and humanity of white people as a weapon to destroy them?

    •�LOL: Corvinus
  382. @Odyssey
    @Peter Akuleyev


    When the Goths showed up, who we know for a fact spoke a Germanic language…
    Incorrect!

    No German folk memory of Arminius survived over the intervening centuries. There is no real evidence that any of the other German tribes saw Arminius as some sort of pan-Germanic hero even during the centuries immediately after the event.
    Why has no German folk memory of Arminius survived over the intervening centuries? Simply put, it is due to another instance of historical reinterpretation. Arminius belonged to the Cherusci tribe, which, according to Wikipedia, is described as a Germanic tribe that lived in the area of modern-day Hanover.

    This, however, is inaccurate. At that time, the so-called Germanic tribes did not inhabit present-day Germany. More precisely, while they can be classified as "Germanic," they are not the ancestors of modern Germans (except for a segment of assimilated Serbs). In the 18th century, Serbian was still spoken around Hanover.

    It is misleading that Tacitus' term Germani is almost universally equated with modern Germans. Such confusion persists because modern Germans lack a clear understanding of their history, including the details of their migration from Asia and the historical origins of the term Germani. This name, which some associate with the Serbs as ancient inhabitants of present-day Germany, has become a source of misinterpretation.

    This issue parallels a comment by Panzer Tre #305 regarding the Greeks. Similarly, the Greeks migrated to Europe (from the Middle East/Africa) and claimed lands from the native Serbs, who originally gave them their name—Greeks, a name Greeks have largely avoided using due to its slightly derogatory connotation.

    Wiki says:
    "The Cherusci were a Germanic tribe that inhabited parts of the plains and forests of northwestern Germania in the area of the Weser River and present-day Hanover during the first centuries BC and AD. Roman sources reported they considered themselves kin with other Irmino tribes."

    Historical maps depict Arminius' tribe, the Cherusci, surrounded by Serbian tribes, such as the Suebi (which Wikipedia also wrongly classifies as a Germanic tribe). The German province of Swabia even derives its name from the Suebi. Unfortunately, German historical narratives are riddled with distortions, and what is even more troubling is the apparent lack of remorse for such fabrications, often overshadowed by a certain arrogance.

    According to a late 8th c. source, Luneburg (in locum qui dicitur Hluini) was considered part of the great Serbian confederation centered in northeast Germania, the renowned Lutici of Luticiorum: Liunniburc quoque oppidum maximum Ottonis duds Saxonici, situm in confinio Saxonum et Luticiorum, 795. :

    https://www.unz.com/article/the-saddest-story-never-told/?showcomments#comment-6651779

    There are a few hundred Serbian toponyms, here is just one of them:
    Bavendorp (Lüneburg) — originated from Babin‘s dorf (Babin’s = Grandma’s, in Serbian). So, Bavendorp=Grandma’s village. Lol.

    HANOVER WENDLAND, VENEDICA GENS – As late as the 18th c. one could still hear Serb or Wend-Polab speech (diepolabischer spräche) or Wend Drevani speech (wendischer spräche Drawey) in the Duchy of Luneburg (in den luneburgischen Amtern Dannenburg, Lucho und Wustro), and in the Wendland known as Hanover Wendland or das Hannoversche Wendland (J.H. Schulze, Etwas über den Bezirk und namen des wendischen Pagus Drawn, 1795. O, Koch, Das Hannoverschen Wenderland der de Gau Drawehn, 1898. B. Wächter, Zur politischen Organization der Wendlandischen Slawen vom 8. bis 12.Jahrhundert, 1989)’

    NICHT WORT DIE DEUTSCHEN SPRACHE – Numerous 17th and early 18th century sources note that in some rural areas the sounds of German speech were seldom heard or understood: Die alten Leutte, weil sie Wendisch, verstehen nicht Wort die deutschen Sprache, will geschweigen den Catehchisimum, 1669.

    WENDEN, GOTTLOSEN – As some Church officials tended to equate German speech with God’s presence, there were even doubts as to God’s existence in Hannoversche Wendland: Von der in Wustrow, Luchow und anderer in orten gesessenen Wenden unvernunfTtigen gewohnheiten und gottlosen Leben, 1671.

    Replies: @anon

    Tacitus’ term Germani

    You should read what Hochart, Fomenko, Guyenot etc wrote on Tacitus. The articles by Guyenot you can find on this site.

    Tacitus was “discovered” by a known plagiarizer, and his Germanica is written in a completely different style than his (?) other works.

    •�Agree: Odyssey
  383. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    The number of years each region was part of the Roman Empire.

    Anatolia, the Levant and North Africa were more core Roman than NW Europe.

    https://i.postimg.cc/rpPZWdVH/GIiv-Mqn-WMAA72-O3.jpg

    There's no shame in white Europeans for being on the peripherals of Roman civilization.

    For white Europeans to claim Roman heritage solely for themselves is completely shameless.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @BB753, @Corpse Tooth, @Thomm, @Coconuts, @Pixo, @Coconuts, @Ibero

    All the Empire was Caucasian, regardless what Americans today call “white”;
    Only Egypt had some “diversity” in modern sense.
    If you put Irish, Germans, Armenians, Greeks, Hebrews, Turkish, Berbers/Arabs (old stock) in the same “movie”, you will not call this “diverse” in modern America (maybe even not if you ad some Huns…).
    Sim, Roman Empire was white/caucasian, but not in the “Anglo” meaning of the word.

  384. @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @Jack D


    It’s not a proto deep fake either
    How so? Do you not know what proto- means?

    Replies: @Jack D

    Yes, it is not even a primitive deep fake. A proto deep fake would be something like the famous photo of Stalin with Yezhov edited out of the picture:

    But this was not any sort of “deep fake” at all, just a counterfeit use of a logo which is not the same category.

    •�Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @Jack D


    Yes, it is not even a primitive deep fake.
    Wrong. The fake car ad is primitive, and yet was likely more convincing to more viewers, proportionally, than your (beheld by contemporaries) Stalin example. Of course, neither example is “deep” in the definitional technological sense,

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deepfake

    Deepfakes (a portmanteau of 'deep learning' and 'fake') are images, videos, or audio which are edited or generated using artificial intelligence tools, and which may depict real or non-existent people. They are a type of synthetic media and modern form of a Media prank.

    While the act of creating fake content is not new, deepfakes uniquely leverage the technological tools and techniques of machine learning and artificial intelligence, including facial recognition algorithms and artificial neural networks such as variational autoencoders (VAEs) and generative adversarial networks (GANs).
    … but both are fake and meant to trick/troll people using realistic imagery. Hence, “proto-deep fake” as Brutusale wrote and you originally truncated for straw man purposes.
    , @David In TN
    @Jack D

    I've always gotten a kick out of the Stalin-Yezhov photos.
  385. @James B. Shearer
    @Jack D

    "Yes, it did. It burned into 99% of them never to follow a mad fascist dictator making promises of German glory into ruin again. ..."

    If it was really 99% they wouldn't need Holocaust denial laws.

    Replies: @Jack D

    The NPD (as close as Germany gets to a neo-Nazi party) has never received more than 5% of the vote and the current estimate of its membership is 3,000 people:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Democratic_Party_of_Germany

    Remember that the Nazi Party itself was once small enough that the entire membership could fit in a beerhall. The best thing to do with fascist movements is to strangle them in their cradle. If you wait until they are large and powerful it may be too late.

    Again I emphasize that free speech laws are somewhat different in Europe. Americans are uncomfortable with the idea of outlawing dangerous ideologies or anything speech related, but Europe doesn’t have the same qualms. This is not because they are undemocratic – they just have slightly different traditions. I like our First Amendment but I understand why other nations might balance free speech and the danger to society from extremists in a different way given their history vs ours.

    •�Replies: @Colin Wright
    @Jack D


    '...Remember that the Nazi Party itself was once small enough that the entire membership could fit in a beerhall. The best thing to do with fascist movements is to strangle them in their cradle. If you wait until they are large and powerful it may be too late...'
    Witness Zionism.
    , @Art Deco
    @Jack D

    Remember that the Nazi Party itself was once small enough that the entire membership could fit in a beerhall. The best thing to do with fascist movements is to strangle them in their cradle. If you wait until they are large and powerful it may be too late.
    ==
    Political movements don't spread like kudzu or breed like the tribbles.
    ==
    The Nazi leadership committed actual criminal acts in 1923 and the German courts were quite slatternly in dealing with them. Hitler was paroled after less than a year and Gen. Ludendorff received no punishment at all.
    ==
    Disorderly conduct, incitement to riot, harassment, assault and menacing, civil defamation &c can all be addressed by the courts and the police. If they are diligent and professional. They could not be bothered in Bavaria in 1923 and, by and large, they cannot be bothered in blue states today in re the real sources of disorder.
    ==
    Please recall that the median performance of volkisch parties in Germany during the period running from 1890 to 1918 was about 2.0%. Between 1918 and 1929 it was about 3%. I'm assured by a German history maven I correspond with that much of the volkisch vote was concealed in the National People's Party's performance; inconsistent with that thesis was the actual performance of the National People's Party: the more volkisch their leadership, the worse their vote totals.
    ==
    Here's a thesis: the Nazi Party, ca. 1931, was a fad movement, rather like the KKK in the United States ca. 1922. Their level of support was something very particular to time and place and would have evaporated as quickly as it appeared.
    ==
    The German establishment managed to lose the war and presided over considerable domestic hardship during and after. The Weimar parties (1) manufactured a structurally defective political order and (b) followed madcap monetary policy during 1922-23. Then the Weimar ministries declined in 1930-32 to devalue the currency, permit low-level inflation, run a deficit, or do much to erect work relief programs. You can see how this worked out for everyone.
    ==
    They did not need to 'strangle' the Nazi Party. They needed to (1) punish criminals and (2) stop making bad decisions in the realm of fiscal and monetary policy.

    Replies: @nebulafox
  386. @Jack D
    @Steve Sailer

    Remember that in the original Shakespeare productions, all the female roles were performed by dudes. That's a lot worse than having a black guy play Macbeth.

    While characters like Macbeth and Hamlet are quasi-historical, they really portray universal concepts. When Hamlet asks, "To be or not to be?" he is not really speaking as a Dane but as a human and any human can ask that existential question. It is for this very reason that we still perform Shakespeare 400 years later when most other works of that time are so rooted in their time and place that they mean nothing to our lives today and can only be viewed as antique curiosities.

    What I do object to is putting blacks into recognizable and contemporary roles where they clearly do not belong. It's one thing to cast a black dude as Hamlet but another to cast one as Winston Churchill. No one has done that yet but the other day I saw a preview for an upcoming movie called Blitz.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iZwykQK9aZo

    The movie is about the German bombing of London and about all the children who were evacuated to the British countryside and separated from their parents. Naturally, this being 2024, the main child character (who is a stand in for all of the British children who were affected by the Blitz) is played by a (half) black child with a white mother. How many (half) black children were there in London in 1940?

    The only true aspect to this is that as far as I can tell, there is no black father in the picture - has there ever been a black man who stuck around to raise his children with a white woman? I have literally never met one. You would think that white women would get the message, or maybe they CHOOSE black men because they don't really want to be tied down by a white dude who they are going to have to take care of into old age? (BTW, women are the ones who instigate the majority of divorces.)

    Replies: @AnotherDad, @Jonathan Mason

    What I do object to is putting blacks into recognizable and contemporary roles where they clearly do not belong. It’s one thing to cast a black dude as Hamlet but another to cast one as Winston Churchill. No one has done that yet but the other day I saw a preview for an upcoming movie called Blitz.

    You’re hitting the crux of it Jack.

    I think simply put the hinge is utility versus politics.

    I would very much prefer not to see a black Hamlet. (We now have blacks jammed into our faces and if I’m going to go out to see a play I want a pleasant experience.) But if some troupe has a black actor “who’d be ideal as Hamlet”, then they do their play that way. Likewise, if a Chinese troupe decides to put on Shakespeare and ergo all the roles are Chinese–fine. (Again, no interest from me, but fine.)

    But that is not what this modern casting is about. Modern casting is about attacking white normality and rubbing normies noses in it. In blacks. In inter-racial. In homosexuals. It is denying white normies their normality. In making white normies eat it.

    The sassy whip smart black female detective solving all the crimes is not there to entertain–there’s no entertainment–but to tell whitey “everything you think about the world is wrong”. You’re on “the wrong side of history”. You don’t count. Your days are numbered.

    (At least back in the day Hollyweird Jews pitching their minoritarian morality plays tried to make something entertaining. For example, Columbo, dogged short smart Jewish guy–played as Italian to avoid being too obvious–tracking down evil Wasp murders. LA full of these murderous Wasps wasn’t believable, but at least a smart Jewish guy outsmarting some Wasps was believable. Minoritarian fairy tales have gotten more feminine, more homo, more black … and way dumber.)

    But airdropping these minorities ahistorically into white stories–ex. blacks in Victorian costume drama–is even more vile, more sinister. It isn’t just “diversity!” or even “you’re on the wrong side of history whitey!” it is a open attack on the idea whites ever had their nations. It is saying “do not even try and think this places was yours”.

    Of course, there were essentially no blacks in Britain during the Blitz. Until the American GIs arrived, there were never more than several thousand blacks in all of Britain (0.01% levels). A typical city dweller might go a few weeks or even months without seeing one. Someone in the countryside might live their whole life and never see a single black. Britain was, shockingly … full of Britons! What has been done to Britain since is nothing short of criminal, genocidal.

    The point of this casting is to give the finger to Britons. “Don’t even think this joint was ever yours.”

    •�Replies: @Wokechoke
    @AnotherDad

    According to some very reliable Mass Observation accounts the docklands area of London had a very mixed population. Stevedores in the wharfs could have been black. However outside of a few maritime ports there simply were no blacks at all.
  387. @Jack D
    @Jenner Ickham Errican

    Yes, it is not even a primitive deep fake. A proto deep fake would be something like the famous photo of Stalin with Yezhov edited out of the picture:

    https://assets.editorial.aetnd.com/uploads/2018/04/nikolai-yezhov-pictured-right-of.jpg

    But this was not any sort of "deep fake" at all, just a counterfeit use of a logo which is not the same category.

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @David In TN

    Yes, it is not even a primitive deep fake.

    Wrong. The fake car ad is primitive, and yet was likely more convincing to more viewers, proportionally, than your (beheld by contemporaries) Stalin example. Of course, neither example is “deep” in the definitional technological sense,

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deepfake

    Deepfakes (a portmanteau of ‘deep learning’ and ‘fake’) are images, videos, or audio which are edited or generated using artificial intelligence tools, and which may depict real or non-existent people. They are a type of synthetic media and modern form of a Media prank.

    While the act of creating fake content is not new, deepfakes uniquely leverage the technological tools and techniques of machine learning and artificial intelligence, including facial recognition algorithms and artificial neural networks such as variational autoencoders (VAEs) and generative adversarial networks (GANs).

    … but both are fake and meant to trick/troll people using realistic imagery. Hence, “proto-deep fake” as Brutusale wrote and you originally truncated for straw man purposes.

  388. @Colin Wright

    '...Conversely, should New York’s Metropolitan Museum of Art be hosting an exhibit titled “Flight Into Egypt” celebrating African-Americans’ dubious assertion that blacks are responsible for ancient Egypt’s artistic glories?'
    It could also have been Egyptian Desert Cats -- but that too strikes me as improbable.

    Being antisemitic is interesting. There are many ambiguities and matters of perspective to take into account. Realizing that blacks really are somewhat...inferior is dull. It's obvious, and about as debatable as the claim that the earth goes around the sun.

    Replies: @kaganovitch

    Being antisemitic is interesting. There are many ambiguities and matters of perspective to take into account.

    So you’re saying Germ Theory is the Dos Equis man? Could be, could be.

  389. @Mr. Anon
    @Brutusale

    That almost looks like an AI-generated woman.

    The only kind Corvinus will ever date.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon

    She’s a Dutch model called Rosa Jongenelen. Impressively long legs.

    Many moons ago I wandered into my village shop one Friday afternoon, and there was a ridiculously tall and very well turned out young lady in front of me – model-like – not a typical customer at all.

    Turned out she was a daughter of the “big house” in the village, and her employment was dancing at the Crazy Horse in Paris.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crazy_Horse_(cabaret)

  390. @Mr. Anon
    @Bardon Kaldian


    The oldest guest is a retired general, a cautious man who actually didn’t say anything worth remembering.
    Probably how he made General.

    This entertainment is not something serious; you don’t have nuances analyses etc. But for any mentally sane & normal person, it is obvious who is right- and who is wrong.
    Yes, Piers Morgan, or his producers, picked the guests who would reinforce the image they wish to convey. You chose sane, rational exponents of the view you wish to promote, and unhinged, not-so-bright exponents of the view you wish to defame. It's the oldest trick in the media playbook.

    And you fell for it.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian

    Piers Morgan invited Jeffrey Sachs who embarrassed himself with his positions on Gaza and Ukraine. And Sachs is considered by many “an expert”. Piers also had John Mearsheimer, another intellectual Russia apologist.

    So, I don’t think your Piers- Machiavel manipulator theory holds water.

    •�Replies: @Mr. Anon
    @Bardon Kaldian


    Piers also had John Mearsheimer, another intellectual Russia apologist.
    If by "Russia apologist" you mean "somebody with a clear head" well, then, yeah.

    Who isn't a "Russia apologist" in your estimation?

    That aside, I still consider Morgan to be a turd.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian, @BB753
  391. @songbird
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms


    The Muslims had papermaking for three centuries earlier, and transmitted it to Europe
    Yellow River Valley wins again!

    But wasn't it the Muslims preventing commerce with China?

    Replies: @Roger-Lodge

    Muslims via the Turks are the ones who destroyed the Silk Road. It prevented trade from Europe with India and China. It’s the exact reason why Christopher Columbus sailed West in hope of reaching India so that they could resume trade in black pepper among other things..

    •�Replies: @Colin Wright
    @Roger-Lodge


    Muslims via the Turks are the ones who destroyed the Silk Road. It prevented trade from Europe with India and China. It’s the exact reason why Christopher Columbus sailed West in hope of reaching India so that they could resume trade in black pepper among other things..
    And don't forget they made it always winter and never Christmas.
  392. @Jack D
    @Steve Sailer

    Remember that in the original Shakespeare productions, all the female roles were performed by dudes. That's a lot worse than having a black guy play Macbeth.

    While characters like Macbeth and Hamlet are quasi-historical, they really portray universal concepts. When Hamlet asks, "To be or not to be?" he is not really speaking as a Dane but as a human and any human can ask that existential question. It is for this very reason that we still perform Shakespeare 400 years later when most other works of that time are so rooted in their time and place that they mean nothing to our lives today and can only be viewed as antique curiosities.

    What I do object to is putting blacks into recognizable and contemporary roles where they clearly do not belong. It's one thing to cast a black dude as Hamlet but another to cast one as Winston Churchill. No one has done that yet but the other day I saw a preview for an upcoming movie called Blitz.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iZwykQK9aZo

    The movie is about the German bombing of London and about all the children who were evacuated to the British countryside and separated from their parents. Naturally, this being 2024, the main child character (who is a stand in for all of the British children who were affected by the Blitz) is played by a (half) black child with a white mother. How many (half) black children were there in London in 1940?

    The only true aspect to this is that as far as I can tell, there is no black father in the picture - has there ever been a black man who stuck around to raise his children with a white woman? I have literally never met one. You would think that white women would get the message, or maybe they CHOOSE black men because they don't really want to be tied down by a white dude who they are going to have to take care of into old age? (BTW, women are the ones who instigate the majority of divorces.)

    Replies: @AnotherDad, @Jonathan Mason

    What I do object to is putting blacks into recognizable and contemporary roles where they clearly do not belong. It’s one thing to cast a black dude as Hamlet but another to cast one as Winston Churchill.

    Yup.

    Yesterday I was watching the latest episode of Wolf Hall, a prestigious BBC drama about Tudor times.

    The director had said that in the latest six episodes, which followed 10 years after the previous episodes, that they had decided to use “color blind casting” this time.

    I was thinking that they were lucky that they still had the same actor playing King Henry the 8th as last time, otherwise they might have ended up with a black or Asian actor in that role, or in the role of Thomas Cromwell.

    As it was, they did end up with a couple of cute black chicks hanging around the court of Henry VIII, but none of them became Queens and none of Henry’s children turned out to be black.

    I guess the color-blind casting worked out well this time, but next time?

    •�Replies: @Curle
    @Jonathan Mason


    As it was, they did end up with a couple of cute black chicks hanging around the court of Henry VIII
    The descendants of Thomas West, Baron de la ware (Delaware), son of Anne Knollys who was herself the daughter of Catherine Carey, had plenty of Black chicks hanging around their large James River plantations. Who was Catherine Carey?

    “Catherine Carey was born in 1524, the daughter of William Carey of Aldenham in Hertfordshire, Gentleman of the Privy Chamber and Esquire of the Body to Henry VIII, and his wife Mary Boleyn, who had once been a mistress of the king.[3] Catherine was thus Elizabeth I's maternal first cousin.[4] Some historians believe that Catherine was an illegitimate child of Henry VIII, which would make her also Elizabeth I's paternal half-sister through their shared father, Henry VIII.”

    So maybe the script writers were just looking into the future.
  393. The Silence of the Panzers. LOL.

  394. @Wokechoke
    @muggles

    If he was a synagogue going adult Jew he would have been assumed literate.


    It’s an interesting question though, why he didn’t to anyone’s knowledge ever write an essay.

    Replies: @Jonathan Mason

    He seemed to have a thing about the scribes and the Pharisees. Presumably if you wanted to write an essay you would hire a scribe.

    To this day, I believe that in India they still have scribes, so that if you need someone to write a letter for you or something, they will do it.

    If that is no longer the case then it was certainly the case during my lifetime.

    Of course with artificial intelligence, you can just ask it to write a letter or a resume for you, or even ask for a calculation of how long a certain battery will run your TV, so very likely we will eventually revert to the times when only a few people can read and write.

    •�Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Jonathan Mason

    He didn’t exist in the first place. A simple letter might have done. Surely adult Jews could all write. Another one of these funny things about the Jewish Carpenter. Ever met one?
  395. @muggles
    @Reg Cæsar


    The question of Mohammed’s is not– he wasn’t. This is even held up as evidence for the faith.
    Likewise, there is no claim that Jesus was literate that I'm aware of. His disciples did the writing, a common thing for major prophets. He was a carpenter by trade.

    Not sure about Moses. He did provide stone tablets, which I suppose he could read. So, God knows Hebrew anyway.

    It is my impression that Buddha spoke to disciples who then reported his words. Not entirely certain if he was literate. I think he was upper class/caste so maybe he was literate.

    Jos. Smith (Mormon) was literate as was L. Ron Hubbard. Very recent.

    Of course, the farther back in time you go, the fewer the literate population.

    Even actual artifact documents by the literate prophet adjacent disciples are few and far between, when they exist at all. Most seem to have gone through a few hands before existing documents can be found today.

    The Chinese seem to have better ancient literate texts, though I don't know if any are claimed to be originally from major religious prophets.

    Replies: @epebble, @Reg Cæsar, @J.Ross, @Wokechoke, @Curle

    Jos. Smith (Mormon) was literate

    Was he? He claims he dictated the book to an unidentified scribe when the best available evidence points to Solomon Spaulding and Sidney Rigdon.

    “Those who believe Smith made use of a Spaulding manuscript usually implicate a Baptist-turned-Campbellite preacher named Sidney Rigdon, who officially converted to Smith’s new faith shortly after it was founded in 1830. Several sources indicate that both Spaulding and Rigdon moved to the Pittsburgh area about 1812. Spaulding left a manuscript of a novel known as “Manuscript Found” at a Pittsburgh printer. It subsequently disappeared. The novel reportedly attempted to portray a biblical origin of American Indians. Friends of Rigdon are on record saying he showed them such a novel. And they say that Rigdon had a close friend who worked at the print shop where Spaulding’s novel had been left.”

    https://www.christianitytoday.com/1977/07/who-really-wrote-book-of-mormon/

  396. @Coconuts
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms


    But what is that “point in time”?
    Why is this important?

    You seemed to be challenging the idea that contemporary white Europeans should claim the Roman heritage solely for themselves, but who at the moment is challenging them for it? Is it part of the collective imagination of any other group that is interested in laying claim to it and carrying it forward?

    I was offering an explanation of why I thought white Europeans tend think like this about it, more than trying to justify this fact. Is there some authority people should look to to determine what is legitimate use of historical memory and cultural heritage?

    As I said in my post I suspect a lot of it is related to religion. This is the reason white Europeans from a Christian background still retain it as a significant cultural and political reference point, at the same time the fact that the Middle East has mostly adopted Islam will be an important explanation for why it doesn't figure as the same reference point in their collective imagination. And the decline of Greek and Latin in the Middle East in favour of Arabic and Turkish.

    Language will be another part of the explanation for the greater identification with Rome's heritage in Europe, because people want to understand (or are taught) the origin and history of their language and they find it in Rome and Greece. That will lead on to people in various parts of Europe realising that they are also likely to be descendants of one time inhabitants of the Roman Empire.

    Replies: @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    You seemed to be challenging the idea that contemporary white Europeans should claim the Roman heritage solely for themselves

    The problem is claiming Greco-Roman as “white” and “European”, which is both false and anachronistic.

    Greece and Rome are offshoots of ancient civilisations of eastern Mediterranean, not northern Europe.

    That will lead on to people in various parts of Europe realising that they are also likely to be descendants of one time inhabitants of the Roman Empire.

    Culturally yes.

    Genetically, descendants of Herman, by definition, cannot be descendants of Romans. Neither are descendants of Britons who revolted against the Romans:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boudica

    Descendants of Vercingétorix can be said to genetic descendants of Roman subjects. But so are many people of MENA background in Europe.

    As I said in my post I suspect a lot of it is related to religion.

    Sure. But legendary heroes during 19th CE Romantic nationalism period were pagan. Wagner didn’t compose operas about Constantine’s conversion.

    And who is the intellectual hero for RWers? Nietzsche, what did he say about Christianity’s impact on Rome? That it was a slave morality that corrupted it.

    What is the country that actually preserves the authentic version of Christianity that Romans converted to? Russia— whether it is part of Europe is debatable.

    The version of Christianity observed in the NW Europe, specifically became of as a criticism and reform toward Roman Catholicism, from Luther to the Puritans.

    Precisely because NW Euros were since the beginning, on the margins of the Roman world.

    •�Replies: @Odyssey
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    Gentlemen, your ignorance is astonishing. The map is a ridiculous forgery. What time period does it depict? Before you start speculating, answer the basic questions:

    (1) Where was the cradle of European civilization, culture, language, mythology and where did the First Industrial Revolution (metal smelting) take place 7000 years ago?
    (2) Where did the white race originate and were the ancestors of today's Westerners, the primitive nomads who came from the Russian steppes to Europe, white?
    (3) When did the Greeks and Germans come to Europe, where did they come from and what were their names before the natives of Europe gave them those names?

    If you don't know the answers to the above questions (feel free to ask if you don't know anything) then it's pointless to write what you're writing.
    , @Jenner Ickham Errican
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms


    The problem is claiming Greco-Roman as “white” and “European”, which is both false and anachronistic.

    Greece and Rome are offshoots of ancient civilisations of eastern Mediterranean, not northern Europe.
    Conclusion to your first sentence is question begging. Your second sentence use of "offshoots" is too vague ("offshoots" how?).

    Classic "Greco-Roman" is certainly White and European (but I repeat myself).

    "From Arcadia, to the stone fields of Inisheer"

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbllDY3baHk
    , @nebulafox
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    > The problem is claiming Greco-Roman as “white” and “European”, which is both false and anachronistic.

    Quite right. Christianity, for its part, fused Rome and Greece with Judea and Persia, and the term itself was coined in Antioch, Syria: the capital of the Roman East.

    Almost like God knew His odds well.

    > That it was a slave morality that corrupted it.

    That slave morality was how he could even learn about the ancients after the civilizational collapse.

    > Precisely because NW Euros were since the beginning, on the margins of the Roman world.

    So were the Turks, and they became Kaisers of Rome. The men who revived Rome in the 3rd Century were Balkan peasant soldiers. Not too different from how Emperor Wen, the product of the mix of Han and steppe peoples, stitched together a new China after centuries of disunity. It ain’t about the pedigree, never was. It’s about the legitimacy. That can come in any number of ways.

    In any case, I’ve always noticed that third-culture frontier children can have a dedication and appreciated that those born in the metropole lack.
  397. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    @Coconuts


    You seemed to be challenging the idea that contemporary white Europeans should claim the Roman heritage solely for themselves
    The problem is claiming Greco-Roman as “white” and “European”, which is both false and anachronistic.

    Greece and Rome are offshoots of ancient civilisations of eastern Mediterranean, not northern Europe.

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/35/Culture_of_Antiquity.png

    That will lead on to people in various parts of Europe realising that they are also likely to be descendants of one time inhabitants of the Roman Empire.
    Culturally yes.

    Genetically, descendants of Herman, by definition, cannot be descendants of Romans. Neither are descendants of Britons who revolted against the Romans:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boudica

    Descendants of Vercingétorix can be said to genetic descendants of Roman subjects. But so are many people of MENA background in Europe.

    As I said in my post I suspect a lot of it is related to religion.
    Sure. But legendary heroes during 19th CE Romantic nationalism period were pagan. Wagner didn’t compose operas about Constantine’s conversion.

    And who is the intellectual hero for RWers? Nietzsche, what did he say about Christianity's impact on Rome? That it was a slave morality that corrupted it.

    What is the country that actually preserves the authentic version of Christianity that Romans converted to? Russia-- whether it is part of Europe is debatable.

    The version of Christianity observed in the NW Europe, specifically became of as a criticism and reform toward Roman Catholicism, from Luther to the Puritans.

    Precisely because NW Euros were since the beginning, on the margins of the Roman world.

    Replies: @Odyssey, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @nebulafox

    Gentlemen, your ignorance is astonishing. The map is a ridiculous forgery. What time period does it depict? Before you start speculating, answer the basic questions:

    (1) Where was the cradle of European civilization, culture, language, mythology and where did the First Industrial Revolution (metal smelting) take place 7000 years ago?
    (2) Where did the white race originate and were the ancestors of today’s Westerners, the primitive nomads who came from the Russian steppes to Europe, white?
    (3) When did the Greeks and Germans come to Europe, where did they come from and what were their names before the natives of Europe gave them those names?

    If you don’t know the answers to the above questions (feel free to ask if you don’t know anything) then it’s pointless to write what you’re writing.

  398. @Jonathan Mason
    @Jack D


    What I do object to is putting blacks into recognizable and contemporary roles where they clearly do not belong. It’s one thing to cast a black dude as Hamlet but another to cast one as Winston Churchill.
    Yup.

    Yesterday I was watching the latest episode of Wolf Hall, a prestigious BBC drama about Tudor times.

    The director had said that in the latest six episodes, which followed 10 years after the previous episodes, that they had decided to use "color blind casting" this time.

    I was thinking that they were lucky that they still had the same actor playing King Henry the 8th as last time, otherwise they might have ended up with a black or Asian actor in that role, or in the role of Thomas Cromwell.

    As it was, they did end up with a couple of cute black chicks hanging around the court of Henry VIII, but none of them became Queens and none of Henry's children turned out to be black.

    I guess the color-blind casting worked out well this time, but next time?

    Replies: @Curle

    As it was, they did end up with a couple of cute black chicks hanging around the court of Henry VIII

    The descendants of Thomas West, Baron de la ware (Delaware), son of Anne Knollys who was herself the daughter of Catherine Carey, had plenty of Black chicks hanging around their large James River plantations. Who was Catherine Carey?

    “Catherine Carey was born in 1524, the daughter of William Carey of Aldenham in Hertfordshire, Gentleman of the Privy Chamber and Esquire of the Body to Henry VIII, and his wife Mary Boleyn, who had once been a mistress of the king.[3] Catherine was thus Elizabeth I’s maternal first cousin.[4] Some historians believe that Catherine was an illegitimate child of Henry VIII, which would make her also Elizabeth I’s paternal half-sister through their shared father, Henry VIII.”

    So maybe the script writers were just looking into the future.

  399. @Almost Missouri

    one of the more prestigious early converts to Christianity in The Acts of the Apostles (Acts 8:26–40) is the "Ethiopian eunuch," treasurer to Queen Candace of Kush, whom Philip the Evangelist encounters in his chariot on the road from Jerusalem to Gaza. He was probably not from modern Ethiopia, but instead was a brownish Nubian from modern Sudan up the Nile River from Egypt.
    Probably. Incidentally, Rembrandt's and Bruegel's depictions of the convert show that those two painters were familiar with sub-Saharan African models but were apparently unfamiliar with eunuchs, who tend to rotund softness.

    The existence of the Nile made north-south travel in northeast Africa easier than crossing the Sahara in parched northwest Africa. ... (However, the impenetrable Sudd swamp on the upper Nile effectively blocked Mediterraneans from reaching the blackest parts of Africa by river.)
    Also the infamous Six Nile Cataracts meant that it was impractical to transport above Aswan any cargo that couldn't walk under its own power.

    the Roman Empire controlled the easy sea route to India: sail down the Red Sea
    Well, ya gotta get to the Red Sea first. And without the benefit of the Suez Canal, you have to build your ships to India from scratch somewhere on the sparsely-settled and thinly wooded Suez coast. And then you have drag your cargo back over a hundred miles of Egyptian desert.

    Richard Francis Burton has a good account of crossing this troublesome neck of land in his Personal narrative of a pilgrimage to Mecca and Medina. Even a millennium and half after the Romans, it was still a depleting undertaking prior to the Canal. One sees why the British prioritized the defense of the Suez Canal second only to the English Channel in the wars that followed.

    But there was less to trade for in Africa than in India.
    Then as now, Africa wasn't a big value-add. Back then though, they just didn't pretend otherwise.

    Harvard ancient DNA geneticist David Reich estimated in 2017 that among Egyptians around the time of Christ there was 6 to 15 percent sub-Saharan ancestry.
    I've always suspected, though I haven't seen enough ancient DNA reports to verify, that most of that sub-Saharan DNA arrived in Egypt in the 25th Dynasty (ca. 700 BC) when Nubian invaders took over the prostrate and exhausted Kingdom, a condition from which it has never really recovered. How did Egypt get that way? Would it surprise you to learn that Egypt had spent the previous centuries doing the old Invade/Invite routine in Nubia and up the Med coast?

    Replies: @Velusian., @Velusian-

    That 6% to 14% figure for ancient Egyptians [2000 years ago] is now 14% to 21% for modern Egyptians. The Arab Muslims are the reason why, they brought millions of black slaves to North Africa and the Middle East from 650AD up until the late 1800s. All North Africans are part black today from this, same with nearly all Arabs, minus the Druze and some Christian Arab groups in the Levant.

    The change in DNA is so drastic between ancient and modern Egyptians, that ancient Egyptians are more closely related to ancient AND modern day Europeans that they are to modern Egyptians.

    The 6% to 14% figure that you cited is from the study that I have linked below. I have the parts bolded where it goes into the differences between ancient and modern Egyptians, and, how this came about [Arab slave trade – long story short].

    Invasions by Nubians mass raping ancient Egyptians is probably correct about how that 6% to 14% black ancestry got there in ancient times. It would also explain the decline of ancient Egypt as the lower IQ from black DNA would drag it down from their previous height and accomplishments.

    I have bolded the parts of the long Nature study about the DNA changes.

    Population genetic analysis of nuclear DNA

    On the nuclear level we merged the SNP data of our three ancient individuals with 2,367 modern individuals34,35 and 294 ancient genomes36 and performed PCA on the joined data set. We found the ancient Egyptian samples falling distinct from modern Egyptians, and closer towards Near Eastern and European samples (Fig. 4a, Supplementary Fig. 3, Supplementary Table 5). In contrast, modern Egyptians are shifted towards sub-Saharan African populations. Model-based clustering using ADMIXTURE37 (Fig. 4b, Supplementary Fig. 4) further supports these results and reveals that the three ancient Egyptians differ from modern Egyptians by a relatively larger Near Eastern genetic component, in particular a component found in Neolithic Levantine ancient individuals36 (Fig. 4b). In contrast, a substantially larger sub-Saharan African component, found primarily in West-African Yoruba, is seen in modern Egyptians compared to the ancient samples. In both PCA and ADMIXTURE analyses, we did not find significant differences between the three ancient samples, despite two of them having nuclear contamination estimates over 5%, which indicates no larger impact of modern DNA contamination. We used outgroup f3-statistics38 (Fig. 5a,b) for the ancient and modern Egyptians to measure shared genetic drift with other ancient and modern populations, using Mbuti as outgroup. We find that ancient Egyptians are most closely related to Neolithic and Bronze Age samples in the Levant, as well as to Neolithic Anatolian and European populations (Fig. 5a,b).

    When comparing this pattern with modern Egyptians, we find that the ancient Egyptians are more closely related to all modern and ancient European populations that we tested (Fig. 5b), likely due to the additional African component in the modern population observed above. By computing f3-statistics38, we determined whether modern Egyptians could be modelled as a mixture of ancient Egyptian and other populations. Our results point towards sub-Saharan African populations as the missing component (Fig. 5c), confirming the results of the ADMIXTURE analysis. We replicated the results based on f3-statistics using only the least contaminated sample (with <1% contamination estimate) and find very similar results (Supplementary Fig. 5), confirming that the moderate levels of modern DNA contamination in two of our samples did not affect our analyses. Finally, we used two methods to estimate the fractions of sub-Saharan African ancestry in ancient and modern Egyptians.

    Both qpAdm35 and the f4-ratio test39 reveal that modern Egyptians inherit 8% more ancestry from African ancestors than the three ancient Egyptians do, which is also consistent with the ADMIXTURE results discussed above. Absolute estimates of African ancestry using these two methods in the three ancient individuals range from 6 to 15%, and in the modern samples from 14 to 21% depending on method and choice of reference populations (see Supplementary Note 1, Supplementary Fig. 6, Supplementary Tables 5–8). We then used ALDER40 to estimate the time of a putative pulse-like admixture event, which was estimated to have occurred 24 generations ago (700 years ago), consistent with previous results from Henn and colleagues16. While this result by itself does not exclude the possibility of much older and continuous gene flow from African sources, the substantially lower African component in our ∼2,000-year-old ancient samples suggests that African gene flow in modern Egyptians occurred indeed predominantly within the last 2,000 years.

    https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms15694

    •�Thanks: Almost Missouri
    •�Replies: @Steve Sailer
    @Velusian.

    Thanks.

    But 6% to 15% black in, say, later Old Testament and New Testament times is, while not large, not negligible either.

    Replies: @Velusian.
  400. @Almost Missouri

    one of the more prestigious early converts to Christianity in The Acts of the Apostles (Acts 8:26–40) is the "Ethiopian eunuch," treasurer to Queen Candace of Kush, whom Philip the Evangelist encounters in his chariot on the road from Jerusalem to Gaza. He was probably not from modern Ethiopia, but instead was a brownish Nubian from modern Sudan up the Nile River from Egypt.
    Probably. Incidentally, Rembrandt's and Bruegel's depictions of the convert show that those two painters were familiar with sub-Saharan African models but were apparently unfamiliar with eunuchs, who tend to rotund softness.

    The existence of the Nile made north-south travel in northeast Africa easier than crossing the Sahara in parched northwest Africa. ... (However, the impenetrable Sudd swamp on the upper Nile effectively blocked Mediterraneans from reaching the blackest parts of Africa by river.)
    Also the infamous Six Nile Cataracts meant that it was impractical to transport above Aswan any cargo that couldn't walk under its own power.

    the Roman Empire controlled the easy sea route to India: sail down the Red Sea
    Well, ya gotta get to the Red Sea first. And without the benefit of the Suez Canal, you have to build your ships to India from scratch somewhere on the sparsely-settled and thinly wooded Suez coast. And then you have drag your cargo back over a hundred miles of Egyptian desert.

    Richard Francis Burton has a good account of crossing this troublesome neck of land in his Personal narrative of a pilgrimage to Mecca and Medina. Even a millennium and half after the Romans, it was still a depleting undertaking prior to the Canal. One sees why the British prioritized the defense of the Suez Canal second only to the English Channel in the wars that followed.

    But there was less to trade for in Africa than in India.
    Then as now, Africa wasn't a big value-add. Back then though, they just didn't pretend otherwise.

    Harvard ancient DNA geneticist David Reich estimated in 2017 that among Egyptians around the time of Christ there was 6 to 15 percent sub-Saharan ancestry.
    I've always suspected, though I haven't seen enough ancient DNA reports to verify, that most of that sub-Saharan DNA arrived in Egypt in the 25th Dynasty (ca. 700 BC) when Nubian invaders took over the prostrate and exhausted Kingdom, a condition from which it has never really recovered. How did Egypt get that way? Would it surprise you to learn that Egypt had spent the previous centuries doing the old Invade/Invite routine in Nubia and up the Med coast?

    Replies: @Velusian., @Velusian-

    That 6% to 14% figure for ancient Egyptians [2000 years ago] is now 14% to 21% for modern Egyptians. The Arab Muslims are the reason why, they brought millions of black slaves to North Africa and the Middle East from 650AD up until the late 1800s. All North Africans are part black today from this, same with nearly all Arabs, minus the Druze and some Christian Arab groups in the Levant.

    The change in DNA is so drastic between ancient and modern Egyptians, that ancient Egyptians are more closely related to ancient AND modern day Europeans that they are to modern Egyptians.

    The 6% to 14% figure that you cited is from the study that I have linked below. I have the parts bolded where it goes into the differences between ancient and modern Egyptians, and, how this came about [Arab slave trade – long story short].

    Invasions by Nubians mass raping ancient Egyptians is probably correct about how that 6% to 14% black ancestry got there in ancient times. It would also explain the decline of ancient Egypt as the lower IQ from black DNA would drag it down from their previous height and accomplishments.

    I have bolded the parts of the long Nature study about the DNA changes.

    Population genetic analysis of nuclear DNA

    On the nuclear level we merged the SNP data of our three ancient individuals with 2,367 modern individuals34,35 and 294 ancient genomes36 and performed PCA on the joined data set. We found the ancient Egyptian samples falling distinct from modern Egyptians, and closer towards Near Eastern and European samples (Fig. 4a, Supplementary Fig. 3, Supplementary Table 5). In contrast, modern Egyptians are shifted towards sub-Saharan African populations. Model-based clustering using ADMIXTURE37 (Fig. 4b, Supplementary Fig. 4) further supports these results and reveals that the three ancient Egyptians differ from modern Egyptians by a relatively larger Near Eastern genetic component, in particular a component found in Neolithic Levantine ancient individuals36 (Fig. 4b). In contrast, a substantially larger sub-Saharan African component, found primarily in West-African Yoruba, is seen in modern Egyptians compared to the ancient samples. In both PCA and ADMIXTURE analyses, we did not find significant differences between the three ancient samples, despite two of them having nuclear contamination estimates over 5%, which indicates no larger impact of modern DNA contamination. We used outgroup f3-statistics38 (Fig. 5a,b) for the ancient and modern Egyptians to measure shared genetic drift with other ancient and modern populations, using Mbuti as outgroup. We find that ancient Egyptians are most closely related to Neolithic and Bronze Age samples in the Levant, as well as to Neolithic Anatolian and European populations (Fig. 5a,b).

    When comparing this pattern with modern Egyptians, we find that the ancient Egyptians are more closely related to all modern and ancient European populations that we tested (Fig. 5b), likely due to the additional African component in the modern population observed above. By computing f3-statistics38, we determined whether modern Egyptians could be modelled as a mixture of ancient Egyptian and other populations. Our results point towards sub-Saharan African populations as the missing component (Fig. 5c), confirming the results of the ADMIXTURE analysis. We replicated the results based on f3-statistics using only the least contaminated sample (with <1% contamination estimate) and find very similar results (Supplementary Fig. 5), confirming that the moderate levels of modern DNA contamination in two of our samples did not affect our analyses. Finally, we used two methods to estimate the fractions of sub-Saharan African ancestry in ancient and modern Egyptians.

    Both qpAdm35 and the f4-ratio test39 reveal that modern Egyptians inherit 8% more ancestry from African ancestors than the three ancient Egyptians do, which is also consistent with the ADMIXTURE results discussed above. Absolute estimates of African ancestry using these two methods in the three ancient individuals range from 6 to 15%, and in the modern samples from 14 to 21% depending on method and choice of reference populations (see Supplementary Note 1, Supplementary Fig. 6, Supplementary Tables 5–8). We then used ALDER40 to estimate the time of a putative pulse-like admixture event, which was estimated to have occurred 24 generations ago (700 years ago), consistent with previous results from Henn and colleagues16. While this result by itself does not exclude the possibility of much older and continuous gene flow from African sources, the substantially lower African component in our ∼2,000-year-old ancient samples suggests that African gene flow in modern Egyptians occurred indeed predominantly within the last 2,000 years.

    .

    https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms15694

  401. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    @Coconuts


    You seemed to be challenging the idea that contemporary white Europeans should claim the Roman heritage solely for themselves
    The problem is claiming Greco-Roman as “white” and “European”, which is both false and anachronistic.

    Greece and Rome are offshoots of ancient civilisations of eastern Mediterranean, not northern Europe.

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/35/Culture_of_Antiquity.png

    That will lead on to people in various parts of Europe realising that they are also likely to be descendants of one time inhabitants of the Roman Empire.
    Culturally yes.

    Genetically, descendants of Herman, by definition, cannot be descendants of Romans. Neither are descendants of Britons who revolted against the Romans:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boudica

    Descendants of Vercingétorix can be said to genetic descendants of Roman subjects. But so are many people of MENA background in Europe.

    As I said in my post I suspect a lot of it is related to religion.
    Sure. But legendary heroes during 19th CE Romantic nationalism period were pagan. Wagner didn’t compose operas about Constantine’s conversion.

    And who is the intellectual hero for RWers? Nietzsche, what did he say about Christianity's impact on Rome? That it was a slave morality that corrupted it.

    What is the country that actually preserves the authentic version of Christianity that Romans converted to? Russia-- whether it is part of Europe is debatable.

    The version of Christianity observed in the NW Europe, specifically became of as a criticism and reform toward Roman Catholicism, from Luther to the Puritans.

    Precisely because NW Euros were since the beginning, on the margins of the Roman world.

    Replies: @Odyssey, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @nebulafox

    The problem is claiming Greco-Roman as “white” and “European”, which is both false and anachronistic.

    Greece and Rome are offshoots of ancient civilisations of eastern Mediterranean, not northern Europe.

    Conclusion to your first sentence is question begging. Your second sentence use of “offshoots” is too vague (“offshoots” how?).

    Classic “Greco-Roman” is certainly White and European (but I repeat myself).

    “From Arcadia, to the stone fields of Inisheer”

  402. @Velusian.
    @Almost Missouri

    That 6% to 14% figure for ancient Egyptians [2000 years ago] is now 14% to 21% for modern Egyptians. The Arab Muslims are the reason why, they brought millions of black slaves to North Africa and the Middle East from 650AD up until the late 1800s. All North Africans are part black today from this, same with nearly all Arabs, minus the Druze and some Christian Arab groups in the Levant.

    The change in DNA is so drastic between ancient and modern Egyptians, that ancient Egyptians are more closely related to ancient AND modern day Europeans that they are to modern Egyptians.

    The 6% to 14% figure that you cited is from the study that I have linked below. I have the parts bolded where it goes into the differences between ancient and modern Egyptians, and, how this came about [Arab slave trade - long story short].

    Invasions by Nubians mass raping ancient Egyptians is probably correct about how that 6% to 14% black ancestry got there in ancient times. It would also explain the decline of ancient Egypt as the lower IQ from black DNA would drag it down from their previous height and accomplishments.

    I have bolded the parts of the long Nature study about the DNA changes.

    Population genetic analysis of nuclear DNA

    On the nuclear level we merged the SNP data of our three ancient individuals with 2,367 modern individuals34,35 and 294 ancient genomes36 and performed PCA on the joined data set. We found the ancient Egyptian samples falling distinct from modern Egyptians, and closer towards Near Eastern and European samples (Fig. 4a, Supplementary Fig. 3, Supplementary Table 5). In contrast, modern Egyptians are shifted towards sub-Saharan African populations. Model-based clustering using ADMIXTURE37 (Fig. 4b, Supplementary Fig. 4) further supports these results and reveals that the three ancient Egyptians differ from modern Egyptians by a relatively larger Near Eastern genetic component, in particular a component found in Neolithic Levantine ancient individuals36 (Fig. 4b). In contrast, a substantially larger sub-Saharan African component, found primarily in West-African Yoruba, is seen in modern Egyptians compared to the ancient samples. In both PCA and ADMIXTURE analyses, we did not find significant differences between the three ancient samples, despite two of them having nuclear contamination estimates over 5%, which indicates no larger impact of modern DNA contamination. We used outgroup f3-statistics38 (Fig. 5a,b) for the ancient and modern Egyptians to measure shared genetic drift with other ancient and modern populations, using Mbuti as outgroup. We find that ancient Egyptians are most closely related to Neolithic and Bronze Age samples in the Levant, as well as to Neolithic Anatolian and European populations (Fig. 5a,b).

    When comparing this pattern with modern Egyptians, we find that the ancient Egyptians are more closely related to all modern and ancient European populations that we tested (Fig. 5b), likely due to the additional African component in the modern population observed above. By computing f3-statistics38, we determined whether modern Egyptians could be modelled as a mixture of ancient Egyptian and other populations. Our results point towards sub-Saharan African populations as the missing component (Fig. 5c), confirming the results of the ADMIXTURE analysis. We replicated the results based on f3-statistics using only the least contaminated sample (with <1% contamination estimate) and find very similar results (Supplementary Fig. 5), confirming that the moderate levels of modern DNA contamination in two of our samples did not affect our analyses. Finally, we used two methods to estimate the fractions of sub-Saharan African ancestry in ancient and modern Egyptians.

    Both qpAdm35 and the f4-ratio test39 reveal that modern Egyptians inherit 8% more ancestry from African ancestors than the three ancient Egyptians do, which is also consistent with the ADMIXTURE results discussed above. Absolute estimates of African ancestry using these two methods in the three ancient individuals range from 6 to 15%, and in the modern samples from 14 to 21% depending on method and choice of reference populations (see Supplementary Note 1, Supplementary Fig. 6, Supplementary Tables 5–8). We then used ALDER40 to estimate the time of a putative pulse-like admixture event, which was estimated to have occurred 24 generations ago (700 years ago), consistent with previous results from Henn and colleagues16. While this result by itself does not exclude the possibility of much older and continuous gene flow from African sources, the substantially lower African component in our ∼2,000-year-old ancient samples suggests that African gene flow in modern Egyptians occurred indeed predominantly within the last 2,000 years.
    https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms15694

    Replies: @Steve Sailer

    Thanks.

    But 6% to 15% black in, say, later Old Testament and New Testament times is, while not large, not negligible either.

    •�Replies: @Velusian.
    @Steve Sailer

    That's true. But they would not be black with that small admixture. It's also telling that both the Greeks and Romans never made a big deal about the looks of Egyptians during their time, or any North Africans for that matter, or Middle Easterners. This implies that they did not stand out much. If they did, then they would have highlighted this in their writings.

    However, there were a few little talked about Roman expeditions to south of the Sahara. One to around Lake Chad, which the Romans deemed it the "land of Ethiopes" (or black men) and called it Agisymba.

    Another went to the jungles around modern day Nigeria. In both cases, the Romans when they went south of the Sahara into clearly negro territory, in their writings, they differentiated about the people they encountered clearly as such about the skin color of the inhabitants and their wirey / afro hair.

    Here is a Wikipedia page about this, with sources. Although I know Wiki can be sketchy, the sources do look good:

    Ptolemy wrote that in 50 AD Septimius Flaccus carried out his expedition in order to retaliate against nomad raiders who attacked Leptis Magna, and reached Sebha and the territory of Aozou.[8] He then reached the Bahr Erguig, Chari, and Logone Rivers in the lake Chad area, described as the "land of Ethiopes" (or black men) and called Agisymba.

    Matiernus expedition: Ptolemy wrote that around 90 AD Julius Maternus (or Matiernus) carried out a mainly commercial expedition. From the Sirte gulf he reached the Oasis of Cufra and the Oasis of Archei, then arrived—after 4 months travelling with the king of the Garamantes—to the Bahr Salamat and Bahr Aouk Rivers, near modern-day Central African Republic in a region then called Agisymba. He went back to Rome with a rhinoceros with two horns, that was shown in the Colosseum.[9]

    According to Raffael Joorde, Maternus was a diplomat who explored with the king of Garamantes the territory south of the Tibesti mountains, while this king executed a military campaign against rebellious subjects or as a "razzia".[10]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romans_in_sub-Saharan_Africa

    There is a lot more information there that is interesting. Anyone reading about this subject would find it that way at least.

    On another point, the reason for my double post is I went to edit my post as I saw a few typos, when I hit save I had a message saying it was deleted or went to spam. I wasn't sure if it deleted my entire comment or why it would, so I put a dash in my name and posted my comment again [I always copy it just in case]. The double post can be deleted if need be.
  403. @Bardon Kaldian
    @Mr. Anon

    Piers Morgan invited Jeffrey Sachs who embarrassed himself with his positions on Gaza and Ukraine. And Sachs is considered by many "an expert". Piers also had John Mearsheimer, another intellectual Russia apologist.

    So, I don't think your Piers- Machiavel manipulator theory holds water.

    Replies: @Mr. Anon

    Piers also had John Mearsheimer, another intellectual Russia apologist.

    If by “Russia apologist” you mean “somebody with a clear head” well, then, yeah.

    Who isn’t a “Russia apologist” in your estimation?

    That aside, I still consider Morgan to be a turd.

    •�Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
    @Mr. Anon

    Stephen Kotkin, Dan Schueftan, Francis Fukuyama, even the late Kissinger are/were not Russian apologists.

    Mearsheimer is anything but clear-headed; he's simply a deranged person with a deranged world-view.

    https://euideas.eui.eu/2022/07/11/john-mearsheimers-lecture-on-ukraine-why-he-is-wrong-and-what-are-the-consequences/

    John Mearsheimer’s lecture on Ukraine: Why he is wrong and what are the consequences


    https://www.newstatesman.com/world/europe/2023/10/john-mearsheimers-incorrect-views-on-everything

    What John Mearsheimer gets wrong about Ukraine

    https://blog.prif.org/2023/07/26/russian-self-defense-fact-checking-arguments-on-the-russo-ukrainian-war-by-john-j-mearsheimer-and-others/

    “Russian Self-Defense”? Fact-Checking Arguments on the Russo-Ukrainian War by John J. Mearsheimer and Others

    https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/auk-2022-2033/html?lang=en&srsltid=AfmBOooB452zUPuj4DykRZVnxM-LXy5pefsnuza9wezAUs_D35VxWk4i

    Realism after Ukraine: A Critique of Geopolitical Reason from Monroe to Mearsheimer

    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/01402390.2024.2379395?needAccess=true

    Understanding Russia’s war against Ukraine: Political, eschatological and cataclysmic dimensions

    https://polispandit.com/john-mearsheimer-is-wrong-about-putin/

    Why John Mearsheimer Is Dangerously Wrong About Putin


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaJ9VZorgjM

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTXEmz6nJGk

    Replies: @Mr. Anon, @J.Ross, @mulga mumblebrain
    , @BB753
    @Mr. Anon

    “Russia apologist” is the polite form for "Putin fanboy". That is, any sane person who thinks starting WWIII with Russia and China is not a good idea.
  404. @Jack D
    @James B. Shearer

    The NPD (as close as Germany gets to a neo-Nazi party) has never received more than 5% of the vote and the current estimate of its membership is 3,000 people:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Democratic_Party_of_Germany

    Remember that the Nazi Party itself was once small enough that the entire membership could fit in a beerhall. The best thing to do with fascist movements is to strangle them in their cradle. If you wait until they are large and powerful it may be too late.

    Again I emphasize that free speech laws are somewhat different in Europe. Americans are uncomfortable with the idea of outlawing dangerous ideologies or anything speech related, but Europe doesn't have the same qualms. This is not because they are undemocratic - they just have slightly different traditions. I like our First Amendment but I understand why other nations might balance free speech and the danger to society from extremists in a different way given their history vs ours.

    Replies: @Colin Wright, @Art Deco

    ‘…Remember that the Nazi Party itself was once small enough that the entire membership could fit in a beerhall. The best thing to do with fascist movements is to strangle them in their cradle. If you wait until they are large and powerful it may be too late…’

    Witness Zionism.

    •�Agree: TWS
  405. @Roger-Lodge
    @songbird

    Muslims via the Turks are the ones who destroyed the Silk Road. It prevented trade from Europe with India and China. It's the exact reason why Christopher Columbus sailed West in hope of reaching India so that they could resume trade in black pepper among other things..

    Replies: @Colin Wright

    Muslims via the Turks are the ones who destroyed the Silk Road. It prevented trade from Europe with India and China. It’s the exact reason why Christopher Columbus sailed West in hope of reaching India so that they could resume trade in black pepper among other things..

    And don’t forget they made it always winter and never Christmas.

  406. @Steve Sailer
    @Velusian.

    Thanks.

    But 6% to 15% black in, say, later Old Testament and New Testament times is, while not large, not negligible either.

    Replies: @Velusian.

    That’s true. But they would not be black with that small admixture. It’s also telling that both the Greeks and Romans never made a big deal about the looks of Egyptians during their time, or any North Africans for that matter, or Middle Easterners. This implies that they did not stand out much. If they did, then they would have highlighted this in their writings.

    However, there were a few little talked about Roman expeditions to south of the Sahara. One to around Lake Chad, which the Romans deemed it the “land of Ethiopes” (or black men) and called it Agisymba.

    Another went to the jungles around modern day Nigeria. In both cases, the Romans when they went south of the Sahara into clearly negro territory, in their writings, they differentiated about the people they encountered clearly as such about the skin color of the inhabitants and their wirey / afro hair.

    Here is a Wikipedia page about this, with sources. Although I know Wiki can be sketchy, the sources do look good:

    Ptolemy wrote that in 50 AD Septimius Flaccus carried out his expedition in order to retaliate against nomad raiders who attacked Leptis Magna, and reached Sebha and the territory of Aozou.[8] He then reached the Bahr Erguig, Chari, and Logone Rivers in the lake Chad area, described as the “land of Ethiopes” (or black men) and called Agisymba.

    Matiernus expedition: Ptolemy wrote that around 90 AD Julius Maternus (or Matiernus) carried out a mainly commercial expedition. From the Sirte gulf he reached the Oasis of Cufra and the Oasis of Archei, then arrived—after 4 months travelling with the king of the Garamantes—to the Bahr Salamat and Bahr Aouk Rivers, near modern-day Central African Republic in a region then called Agisymba. He went back to Rome with a rhinoceros with two horns, that was shown in the Colosseum.[9]

    According to Raffael Joorde, Maternus was a diplomat who explored with the king of Garamantes the territory south of the Tibesti mountains, while this king executed a military campaign against rebellious subjects or as a “razzia”.[10]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romans_in_sub-Saharan_Africa

    There is a lot more information there that is interesting. Anyone reading about this subject would find it that way at least.

    On another point, the reason for my double post is I went to edit my post as I saw a few typos, when I hit save I had a message saying it was deleted or went to spam. I wasn’t sure if it deleted my entire comment or why it would, so I put a dash in my name and posted my comment again [I always copy it just in case]. The double post can be deleted if need be.

  407. @Wokechoke
    Mel Gibson’s casting was in a sense a missed opportunity. In Passion on the Christ, Pilate’s Samnite origins could have been exploited. Additionally the Roman soldiers should have simply been local Jews joined up in the auxiliary cohorts raised by Pilate, seeking citizenship in exchange for policing their own. The conversations between Pilate and his men might have been
    Comical interactions of Aramaic/Greek speaking Jews in Roman like uniforms with a spivvy up and coming Italic chancer.

    No Roman legionary was ever stationed in Jerusalem. Until Titus came to burn it all down.

    Replies: @Goddard

    Gibson’s Passion had much too much Latin dialogue. The Jews spoke Aramaic to each other, the Romans Greek.

    •�Replies: @Odyssey
    @Goddard


    The Jews spoke Aramaic to each other…
    Lol. The term "Jews" didn't even exist back then. Go back to the beginning and find out who actually spoke Aramaic. Even today, some people speak Aramaic as their native language, which means it's different from both Yidish and Hebrew.. This is already too hard for you, so I won't ask you if Aramaic is Semitic or Indo-European, since even scholars don't know that.

    Romans [spoke] Greek.
    LooooL. You obviously don't even know who the Romans were, and it seems like very few people on this thread do. Most people think they were aliens who once had an empire on Earth and then abandoned it after it fell.

    First, there was no Greece (until 1829 AC). Modern-day Greece was part of the Roman province of Illyricum.
    Secondly, the Greeks were not in the Roman combat units of the empire at all (tell me why!) so they could not give a single emperor, unlike, for example, the Serbs, who were the iron fist of the Roman army and gave dozens of emperors (see, for example, #206).
    Thirdly, in the Roman army, Latin was not spoken language, everyone spoke their native language. Your ignorance is great, but that does not mean that you are a hopeless case.

    Replies: @Goddard
  408. @Reg Cæsar
    @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality


    And your side especially hates it for being anti-gay/trans.
    That "gay/trans" is a "thing" at all is a completely white man's phenomenon. Even the most tolerant non-whites, e.g. Thais, merely carve out a "safe space" for what are viewed as a thin sliver of harmless nuts. "Equality" and celebration are as white as white gets.

    So the Russians have more in common with Africans than with their "fellow" Europeans, who have mostly all swallowed the pink pill. Where is your racial loyalty? "If it's white, it must be right!"

    the same antipathy toward healthy heterosexual male assertiveness that queers do.
    Barging into an online forum to announce that the whole of three thousand years of moral philosophy is meaningless, and that only you-- and a few "uncontacted" tribes in the wilderness-- have the answer is certainly assertive. Few would call it "healthy".

    Your side hates Russia because it is a big white country that intends to stay that way.
    By annexing Ukraine to balance these? The non-white part is actually bigger, by area.

    https://www.aljazeera.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/AP22129383329879.jpg


    https://i0.wp.com/www.gemmagoesglobal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/IMG_5021-scaled.jpg

    https://www.56thparallel.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/17134_900-min.jpg.webp

    https://optim.tildacdn.one/tild3434-3966-4165-b662-396437393836/-/format/webp/Ethnic.jpg

    Replies: @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality, @Mike Tre

    “That “gay/trans” is a “thing” at all is a completely white man’s phenomenon.”

    This of course, is complete and utter bullshit.

  409. @Mr. Anon
    @Bardon Kaldian


    Piers also had John Mearsheimer, another intellectual Russia apologist.
    If by "Russia apologist" you mean "somebody with a clear head" well, then, yeah.

    Who isn't a "Russia apologist" in your estimation?

    That aside, I still consider Morgan to be a turd.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian, @BB753

    Stephen Kotkin, Dan Schueftan, Francis Fukuyama, even the late Kissinger are/were not Russian apologists.

    Mearsheimer is anything but clear-headed; he’s simply a deranged person with a deranged world-view.

    https://euideas.eui.eu/2022/07/11/john-mearsheimers-lecture-on-ukraine-why-he-is-wrong-and-what-are-the-consequences/

    John Mearsheimer’s lecture on Ukraine: Why he is wrong and what are the consequences

    https://www.newstatesman.com/world/europe/2023/10/john-mearsheimers-incorrect-views-on-everything

    What John Mearsheimer gets wrong about Ukraine

    https://blog.prif.org/2023/07/26/russian-self-defense-fact-checking-arguments-on-the-russo-ukrainian-war-by-john-j-mearsheimer-and-others/

    “Russian Self-Defense”? Fact-Checking Arguments on the Russo-Ukrainian War by John J. Mearsheimer and Others

    https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/auk-2022-2033/html?lang=en&srsltid=AfmBOooB452zUPuj4DykRZVnxM-LXy5pefsnuza9wezAUs_D35VxWk4i

    Realism after Ukraine: A Critique of Geopolitical Reason from Monroe to Mearsheimer

    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/01402390.2024.2379395?needAccess=true

    Understanding Russia’s war against Ukraine: Political, eschatological and cataclysmic dimensions

    https://polispandit.com/john-mearsheimer-is-wrong-about-putin/

    Why John Mearsheimer Is Dangerously Wrong About Putin

    •�Thanks: HA
    •�Replies: @Mr. Anon
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Whoopee. An EU thinktank and some Neocon proff don't like Mearsheimer.

    I like him better already.

    I'm not impressed by your "experts".

    Replies: @Odyssey, @Bardon Kaldian
    , @J.Ross
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Mearscheimer just fucking called all of it spot on and with change, years in advance.

    Replies: @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality, @HA
    , @mulga mumblebrain
    @Bardon Kaldian

    I'd say that Kotkin, a FANATIC Russophobe (a good career move) in my opinion is a pile of shite, but that would be insulting to faeces.
  410. @Old Prude
    @Joe Stalin

    Sorry, shooting down slow moving drones does not count as air to air combat any more than blowing up five trucks makes one an ace.

    Target practice against RC airplanes (with missiles no less!) is not anywhere near the neighborhood of being locked in deadly combat against Russian, German and Japanese pilots.

    With medal inflation, today's military probably sees it differently.

    Replies: @Felpudinho

    Sorry, shooting down slow moving drones does not count as air to air combat any more than blowing up five trucks makes one an ace…

    …With medal inflation, today’s military probably sees it differently.

    Speaking of “Medal Inflation,” look at the awards decorating the chest of Ukrainian-American fatty, Alexander Vindman. Remember, this is a guy who retired early from the Military because he said he was being bullied too much.

    •�Agree: Felpudinho
    •�Replies: @Jim Don Bob
    @Felpudinho

    It's hard to believe that he has a Ranger tab. They don't come in cereal boxes.
    , @Curle
    @Felpudinho

    The guy who assigned himself the job of sabotaging the Commander in Chief’s foreign policy? How many medals did Aaron Burr get, granted his violation was much less severe?

    Replies: @kaganovitch
    , @mulga mumblebrain
    @Felpudinho

    Looks like an orc can come in the '..fat and sleek-headed..' variety. The 'lean and hungry' are like the hatchet-mouthed female orcess, Fiona Hill.

    Replies: @Felpudinho
    , @nebulafox
    @Felpudinho

    And they wonder why young men don’t want to enlist and why old men are telling their sons not to.

    Seriously, there’s no shortage of guys unwilling to be trained (and unwilling to give up games and virtual pussy, especially if that means the real thing) in the art of slaughtering cartel assholes on the border or learning how nuclear submarines can be built and operated. You know, stuff the US military should be doing, and one where they’d be willing to tolerate wackiness in exchange for competence and seriousness. There’s a serious shortage of men willing to die for Biden’s Ukrainian bribes or who want to learn how to make PowerPoints on the dangers of flyover kids going off to spy for the PRC or Israel.

    The Bureaucrats and REMFS are the problem.
  411. @Mr. Anon
    @Bardon Kaldian


    Piers also had John Mearsheimer, another intellectual Russia apologist.
    If by "Russia apologist" you mean "somebody with a clear head" well, then, yeah.

    Who isn't a "Russia apologist" in your estimation?

    That aside, I still consider Morgan to be a turd.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian, @BB753

    “Russia apologist” is the polite form for “Putin fanboy”. That is, any sane person who thinks starting WWIII with Russia and China is not a good idea.

    •�Agree: Mr. Anon, Felpudinho
  412. @anon
    @BB753

    Could you post a TLDR of the video?

    Does it come to the same conclusion as this insightful article?

    https://www.unz.com/article/what-race-were-the-greeks-and-romans/

    Replies: @BB753, @BB753

    “Russia apologist” is the polite form for “Putin fanboy”. That is, any sane person who thinks starting WWIII with Russia and China is not a good idea.

  413. @anon
    @BB753

    Could you post a TLDR of the video?

    Does it come to the same conclusion as this insightful article?

    https://www.unz.com/article/what-race-were-the-greeks-and-romans/

    Replies: @BB753, @BB753

    “Could you post a TLDR of the video?”

    Can’t you spare 30 minutes and educate yourself?

    “Does it come to the same conclusion as this insightful article?

    https://www.unz.com/article/what-race-were-the-greeks-and-romans/&#8221;
    No, it reaches a different conclusion. Romans were white but not Nordic . BTW, that article is not insightful at all.

  414. @Isabel Archer
    @Trinity

    The gators in these videos from Florida and South Carolina look pretty big to me. Usually they are seen crossing golf courses. One in Fripp Island, SC was nicknamed Sherman the Tank:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXn1g0xtUMk
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cy2akN2bTX4
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6vfCowyoSY
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWS5xfIaoeA

    Replies: @Trinity

    I know that a 14 footer killed a guy in Lakeland, Florida in 2005-2006. There was a 1,043 lb alligator caught in Gainesville, Florida. An alligator named Stokes in Alabama was a 15 footer. Salt water crocodiles can get as large as 20 feet or more and weigh over a ton, however in some cases. Those huge alligators have probably been around for awhile as well. Thanks for those videos. Awesome sight. Louisiana and Florida also have some awesome specimens of alligator snapping turtles but the largest caught on record was a 211 pounder in Texas.

  415. @Felpudinho
    @Old Prude


    Sorry, shooting down slow moving drones does not count as air to air combat any more than blowing up five trucks makes one an ace...

    ...With medal inflation, today’s military probably sees it differently.
    Speaking of "Medal Inflation," look at the awards decorating the chest of Ukrainian-American fatty, Alexander Vindman. Remember, this is a guy who retired early from the Military because he said he was being bullied too much.

    https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2019/10/Impeachment9-1024x762.jpg

    Replies: @Jim Don Bob, @Curle, @mulga mumblebrain, @nebulafox

    It’s hard to believe that he has a Ranger tab. They don’t come in cereal boxes.

    •�Agree: Felpudinho
  416. @AnotherDad
    @Jack D


    What I do object to is putting blacks into recognizable and contemporary roles where they clearly do not belong. It’s one thing to cast a black dude as Hamlet but another to cast one as Winston Churchill. No one has done that yet but the other day I saw a preview for an upcoming movie called Blitz.
    You're hitting the crux of it Jack.

    I think simply put the hinge is utility versus politics.

    I would very much prefer not to see a black Hamlet. (We now have blacks jammed into our faces and if I'm going to go out to see a play I want a pleasant experience.) But if some troupe has a black actor "who'd be ideal as Hamlet", then they do their play that way. Likewise, if a Chinese troupe decides to put on Shakespeare and ergo all the roles are Chinese--fine. (Again, no interest from me, but fine.)

    But that is not what this modern casting is about. Modern casting is about attacking white normality and rubbing normies noses in it. In blacks. In inter-racial. In homosexuals. It is denying white normies their normality. In making white normies eat it.

    The sassy whip smart black female detective solving all the crimes is not there to entertain--there's no entertainment--but to tell whitey "everything you think about the world is wrong". You're on "the wrong side of history". You don't count. Your days are numbered.

    (At least back in the day Hollyweird Jews pitching their minoritarian morality plays tried to make something entertaining. For example, Columbo, dogged short smart Jewish guy--played as Italian to avoid being too obvious--tracking down evil Wasp murders. LA full of these murderous Wasps wasn't believable, but at least a smart Jewish guy outsmarting some Wasps was believable. Minoritarian fairy tales have gotten more feminine, more homo, more black ... and way dumber.)

    But airdropping these minorities ahistorically into white stories--ex. blacks in Victorian costume drama--is even more vile, more sinister. It isn't just "diversity!" or even "you're on the wrong side of history whitey!" it is a open attack on the idea whites ever had their nations. It is saying "do not even try and think this places was yours".

    Of course, there were essentially no blacks in Britain during the Blitz. Until the American GIs arrived, there were never more than several thousand blacks in all of Britain (0.01% levels). A typical city dweller might go a few weeks or even months without seeing one. Someone in the countryside might live their whole life and never see a single black. Britain was, shockingly ... full of Britons! What has been done to Britain since is nothing short of criminal, genocidal.

    The point of this casting is to give the finger to Britons. "Don't even think this joint was ever yours."

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    According to some very reliable Mass Observation accounts the docklands area of London had a very mixed population. Stevedores in the wharfs could have been black. However outside of a few maritime ports there simply were no blacks at all.

  417. @Goddard
    @Wokechoke

    Gibson’s Passion had much too much Latin dialogue. The Jews spoke Aramaic to each other, the Romans Greek.

    Replies: @Odyssey

    The Jews spoke Aramaic to each other…

    Lol. The term “Jews” didn’t even exist back then. Go back to the beginning and find out who actually spoke Aramaic. Even today, some people speak Aramaic as their native language, which means it’s different from both Yidish and Hebrew.. This is already too hard for you, so I won’t ask you if Aramaic is Semitic or Indo-European, since even scholars don’t know that.

    Romans [spoke] Greek.

    LooooL. You obviously don’t even know who the Romans were, and it seems like very few people on this thread do. Most people think they were aliens who once had an empire on Earth and then abandoned it after it fell.

    First, there was no Greece (until 1829 AC). Modern-day Greece was part of the Roman province of Illyricum.
    Secondly, the Greeks were not in the Roman combat units of the empire at all (tell me why!) so they could not give a single emperor, unlike, for example, the Serbs, who were the iron fist of the Roman army and gave dozens of emperors (see, for example, #206).
    Thirdly, in the Roman army, Latin was not spoken language, everyone spoke their native language. Your ignorance is great, but that does not mean that you are a hopeless case.

    •�Replies: @Goddard
    @Odyssey

    You’re a pedant.
  418. @Bardon Kaldian
    @Mr. Anon

    Stephen Kotkin, Dan Schueftan, Francis Fukuyama, even the late Kissinger are/were not Russian apologists.

    Mearsheimer is anything but clear-headed; he's simply a deranged person with a deranged world-view.

    https://euideas.eui.eu/2022/07/11/john-mearsheimers-lecture-on-ukraine-why-he-is-wrong-and-what-are-the-consequences/

    John Mearsheimer’s lecture on Ukraine: Why he is wrong and what are the consequences


    https://www.newstatesman.com/world/europe/2023/10/john-mearsheimers-incorrect-views-on-everything

    What John Mearsheimer gets wrong about Ukraine

    https://blog.prif.org/2023/07/26/russian-self-defense-fact-checking-arguments-on-the-russo-ukrainian-war-by-john-j-mearsheimer-and-others/

    “Russian Self-Defense”? Fact-Checking Arguments on the Russo-Ukrainian War by John J. Mearsheimer and Others

    https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/auk-2022-2033/html?lang=en&srsltid=AfmBOooB452zUPuj4DykRZVnxM-LXy5pefsnuza9wezAUs_D35VxWk4i

    Realism after Ukraine: A Critique of Geopolitical Reason from Monroe to Mearsheimer

    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/01402390.2024.2379395?needAccess=true

    Understanding Russia’s war against Ukraine: Political, eschatological and cataclysmic dimensions

    https://polispandit.com/john-mearsheimer-is-wrong-about-putin/

    Why John Mearsheimer Is Dangerously Wrong About Putin


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaJ9VZorgjM

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTXEmz6nJGk

    Replies: @Mr. Anon, @J.Ross, @mulga mumblebrain

    Whoopee. An EU thinktank and some Neocon proff don’t like Mearsheimer.

    I like him better already.

    I’m not impressed by your “experts”.

    •�Replies: @Odyssey
    @Mr. Anon

    You probably missed one of my earlier observations/conclusions. There are several groups whose members are all, meaning 100% without a single exception (but without a single one) Russophobes and Putin haters, who support the Ukros. These are Croatian Ustashas, ​​Zionists, Albanian Muslim goatbotherers and faggots. So, now it's easy to conclude what the real issue is.

    Replies: @Mark G., @J.Ross, @Bardon Kaldian
    , @Bardon Kaldian
    @Mr. Anon

    Confucius: The Superior Man understands what is right, the Inferior Man understands what will sell.
  419. @Jonathan Mason
    @Wokechoke

    He seemed to have a thing about the scribes and the Pharisees. Presumably if you wanted to write an essay you would hire a scribe.

    To this day, I believe that in India they still have scribes, so that if you need someone to write a letter for you or something, they will do it.

    If that is no longer the case then it was certainly the case during my lifetime.

    Of course with artificial intelligence, you can just ask it to write a letter or a resume for you, or even ask for a calculation of how long a certain battery will run your TV, so very likely we will eventually revert to the times when only a few people can read and write.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    He didn’t exist in the first place. A simple letter might have done. Surely adult Jews could all write. Another one of these funny things about the Jewish Carpenter. Ever met one?

  420. @YetAnotherAnon
    I see a French TV channel has been fined for calling abortion "the world's leading cause of death".

    Hat tip to Mr Anglin.

    https://dailystormer.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/ivg-1219114726-618x309.jpg

    I (and I hope Steve) would love to know the racial breakdown of those 73 million.

    Replies: @Jonathan Mason

    It seems odd to separate out cancer and tobacco as separate causes of death.

    Of course smoking tobacco can cause all kinds of respiratory ailments other than cancer, but I wonder how accurate these global statistics can be.

    Anyway I suppose the implication is that if you are opposed to legal abortion, then you should also be opposed to legal smoking of tobacco.

  421. @Odyssey
    @Goddard


    The Jews spoke Aramaic to each other…
    Lol. The term "Jews" didn't even exist back then. Go back to the beginning and find out who actually spoke Aramaic. Even today, some people speak Aramaic as their native language, which means it's different from both Yidish and Hebrew.. This is already too hard for you, so I won't ask you if Aramaic is Semitic or Indo-European, since even scholars don't know that.

    Romans [spoke] Greek.
    LooooL. You obviously don't even know who the Romans were, and it seems like very few people on this thread do. Most people think they were aliens who once had an empire on Earth and then abandoned it after it fell.

    First, there was no Greece (until 1829 AC). Modern-day Greece was part of the Roman province of Illyricum.
    Secondly, the Greeks were not in the Roman combat units of the empire at all (tell me why!) so they could not give a single emperor, unlike, for example, the Serbs, who were the iron fist of the Roman army and gave dozens of emperors (see, for example, #206).
    Thirdly, in the Roman army, Latin was not spoken language, everyone spoke their native language. Your ignorance is great, but that does not mean that you are a hopeless case.

    Replies: @Goddard

    You’re a pedant.

  422. @Mr. Anon
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Whoopee. An EU thinktank and some Neocon proff don't like Mearsheimer.

    I like him better already.

    I'm not impressed by your "experts".

    Replies: @Odyssey, @Bardon Kaldian

    You probably missed one of my earlier observations/conclusions. There are several groups whose members are all, meaning 100% without a single exception (but without a single one) Russophobes and Putin haters, who support the Ukros. These are Croatian Ustashas, ​​Zionists, Albanian Muslim goatbotherers and faggots. So, now it’s easy to conclude what the real issue is.

    •�Replies: @Mark G.
    @Odyssey

    Thank you. Calling a foreign leader a threat to America often in reality is based on traditional ethnic or religious hatreds of the person making the claim. In the past immigrants were expected to leave their traditional ethnic and religious hatreds behind in the old country and focus on being good Americans.

    Just a desire to extract mineral, agricultural or other resources from a country also often is behind some foreign land being identified as a place we must occupy to bring world peace. A third driver is the Military-Industrial Complex and its desire for profits. Wars are good for the MIC.

    With two large oceans on each side of us and by far the largest military on the planet, there is little threat of a foreign invasion. Military spending could be cut in half and it would still be enough to defend the country. That would not be a large enough military, though, to fight wars around the planet for other reasons.

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @BB753
    , @J.Ross
    @Odyssey

    Pyramids.
    , @Bardon Kaldian
    @Odyssey


    and faggots
    So.....that's why you support Russian genocidal invasion?
  423. @Odyssey
    @mc23

    Cleopatra was the last member of the Ptolemaic dynasty. Ptolemy himself was given Egypt to rule after the poisoning of Alexander the Great. Alexander himself, as well as his dukes/generals - Seleucus (who gained Persia), Cassander (who gained the Balkans), and Ptolemy were Serbs, although those who are quite late in mental development think that Alexander was Greek.

    Replies: @AnotherDad, @Apostolos, @mc23

    I agree Cleopatra was Greek, she is depicted with few a Black servants among a crowd of Egyptians.

    •�Replies: @Odyssey
    @mc23

    Alexander, Ptolemy, and Cleopatra were NOT Greeks.

    Replies: @Wokechoke
  424. @Odyssey
    @Mr. Anon

    You probably missed one of my earlier observations/conclusions. There are several groups whose members are all, meaning 100% without a single exception (but without a single one) Russophobes and Putin haters, who support the Ukros. These are Croatian Ustashas, ​​Zionists, Albanian Muslim goatbotherers and faggots. So, now it's easy to conclude what the real issue is.

    Replies: @Mark G., @J.Ross, @Bardon Kaldian

    Thank you. Calling a foreign leader a threat to America often in reality is based on traditional ethnic or religious hatreds of the person making the claim. In the past immigrants were expected to leave their traditional ethnic and religious hatreds behind in the old country and focus on being good Americans.

    Just a desire to extract mineral, agricultural or other resources from a country also often is behind some foreign land being identified as a place we must occupy to bring world peace. A third driver is the Military-Industrial Complex and its desire for profits. Wars are good for the MIC.

    With two large oceans on each side of us and by far the largest military on the planet, there is little threat of a foreign invasion. Military spending could be cut in half and it would still be enough to defend the country. That would not be a large enough military, though, to fight wars around the planet for other reasons.

    •�Agree: Odyssey
    •�Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @Mark G.

    "With two large oceans on each side of us and by far the largest military on the planet, there is little threat of a foreign invasion."

    And yet, in spite of all that, there it is , right here --- the largest foreign invasion in all human history, happening right now, to this very country: conceived, sponsored, funded and abetted by its own ostensible "government"; and we're not supposed to resist it in any way, or even talk about it.
    , @BB753
    @Mark G.

    "With two large oceans on each side of us and by far the largest military on the planet, there is little threat of a foreign invasion. "

    No, America has no longer the largest military on the planet. That'd be more military bases than any other country, but not the largest military by any stretch of the imagination.
  425. @Odyssey
    @Mr. Anon

    You probably missed one of my earlier observations/conclusions. There are several groups whose members are all, meaning 100% without a single exception (but without a single one) Russophobes and Putin haters, who support the Ukros. These are Croatian Ustashas, ​​Zionists, Albanian Muslim goatbotherers and faggots. So, now it's easy to conclude what the real issue is.

    Replies: @Mark G., @J.Ross, @Bardon Kaldian

    Pyramids.

  426. @Bardon Kaldian
    @Mr. Anon

    Stephen Kotkin, Dan Schueftan, Francis Fukuyama, even the late Kissinger are/were not Russian apologists.

    Mearsheimer is anything but clear-headed; he's simply a deranged person with a deranged world-view.

    https://euideas.eui.eu/2022/07/11/john-mearsheimers-lecture-on-ukraine-why-he-is-wrong-and-what-are-the-consequences/

    John Mearsheimer’s lecture on Ukraine: Why he is wrong and what are the consequences


    https://www.newstatesman.com/world/europe/2023/10/john-mearsheimers-incorrect-views-on-everything

    What John Mearsheimer gets wrong about Ukraine

    https://blog.prif.org/2023/07/26/russian-self-defense-fact-checking-arguments-on-the-russo-ukrainian-war-by-john-j-mearsheimer-and-others/

    “Russian Self-Defense”? Fact-Checking Arguments on the Russo-Ukrainian War by John J. Mearsheimer and Others

    https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/auk-2022-2033/html?lang=en&srsltid=AfmBOooB452zUPuj4DykRZVnxM-LXy5pefsnuza9wezAUs_D35VxWk4i

    Realism after Ukraine: A Critique of Geopolitical Reason from Monroe to Mearsheimer

    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/01402390.2024.2379395?needAccess=true

    Understanding Russia’s war against Ukraine: Political, eschatological and cataclysmic dimensions

    https://polispandit.com/john-mearsheimer-is-wrong-about-putin/

    Why John Mearsheimer Is Dangerously Wrong About Putin


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaJ9VZorgjM

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTXEmz6nJGk

    Replies: @Mr. Anon, @J.Ross, @mulga mumblebrain

    Mearscheimer just fucking called all of it spot on and with change, years in advance.

    •�Replies: @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality
    @J.Ross

    You don't understand. Mearscheimer is evil! He goes against the Narrative.
    , @HA
    @J.Ross

    "[Mearshimer] just f*cking called all of it spot on and with change, years in advance."

    You mean when he assured us Russia would not invade Ukraine?

    In 2015…[Mearshimer] dismissed the idea that Russia would ever try to ‘’conquer Ukraine’’ — arguing ‘’Putin is much too smart for that.’’
    Here's the actual video of him saying that, with some other relevant context:

    "Russia is a declining great power, and…if they were trying to create a Greater Russia by invading Ukraine…they’d be jumping into the briar patch. In fact, again, if you want to wreck Russia, what you should do is tell them to try and create a greater Russia; it will lead to no end of trouble [and] I think Putin is much too smart for that…."
    Yup, as all the fanboys will loudly agree, Russia is indeed a declining great power. And then, Mearshimer changed gears and assured us that not only would Russia invade, but that Kyiv would be leveled

    Then, in the lead up to the 2022 invasion, [he] argued,…quote…: ‘’What the Russians are going to do is CRUSH the Ukrainians. They’re going to bring out the big guns. They’re going to turn places like Kyiv and other cities in Ukraine into rubble. It will be like Fallujah, Mosul, Grozny.’’ [He] argued Western intervention would be pointless because Russia would level Ukraine and go nuclear against the West…”
    So much for "spot on and years in advance". If you're that cued into his pronouncements, you might have at least bothered to spell ol' Mearscheimer's name right.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian, @Curle, @mulga mumblebrain
  427. @Mark G.
    @Odyssey

    Thank you. Calling a foreign leader a threat to America often in reality is based on traditional ethnic or religious hatreds of the person making the claim. In the past immigrants were expected to leave their traditional ethnic and religious hatreds behind in the old country and focus on being good Americans.

    Just a desire to extract mineral, agricultural or other resources from a country also often is behind some foreign land being identified as a place we must occupy to bring world peace. A third driver is the Military-Industrial Complex and its desire for profits. Wars are good for the MIC.

    With two large oceans on each side of us and by far the largest military on the planet, there is little threat of a foreign invasion. Military spending could be cut in half and it would still be enough to defend the country. That would not be a large enough military, though, to fight wars around the planet for other reasons.

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @BB753

    “With two large oceans on each side of us and by far the largest military on the planet, there is little threat of a foreign invasion.”

    And yet, in spite of all that, there it is , right here — the largest foreign invasion in all human history, happening right now, to this very country: conceived, sponsored, funded and abetted by its own ostensible “government”; and we’re not supposed to resist it in any way, or even talk about it.

  428. @mc23
    @Odyssey

    I agree Cleopatra was Greek, she is depicted with few a Black servants among a crowd of Egyptians.

    Replies: @Odyssey

    Alexander, Ptolemy, and Cleopatra were NOT Greeks.

    •�Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Odyssey

    Macedonian.

    Replies: @Odyssey
  429. @J.Ross
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Mearscheimer just fucking called all of it spot on and with change, years in advance.

    Replies: @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality, @HA

    You don’t understand. Mearscheimer is evil! He goes against the Narrative.

  430. @J.Ross
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Mearscheimer just fucking called all of it spot on and with change, years in advance.

    Replies: @Loyalty is The First Law of Morality, @HA

    “[Mearshimer] just f*cking called all of it spot on and with change, years in advance.”

    You mean when he assured us Russia would not invade Ukraine?

    In 2015…[Mearshimer] dismissed the idea that Russia would ever try to ‘’conquer Ukraine’’ — arguing ‘’Putin is much too smart for that.’’

    Here’s the actual video of him saying that, with some other relevant context:

    “Russia is a declining great power, and…if they were trying to create a Greater Russia by invading Ukraine…they’d be jumping into the briar patch. In fact, again, if you want to wreck Russia, what you should do is tell them to try and create a greater Russia; it will lead to no end of trouble [and] I think Putin is much too smart for that….”

    Yup, as all the fanboys will loudly agree, Russia is indeed a declining great power. And then, Mearshimer changed gears and assured us that not only would Russia invade, but that Kyiv would be leveled

    Then, in the lead up to the 2022 invasion, [he] argued,…quote…: ‘’What the Russians are going to do is CRUSH the Ukrainians. They’re going to bring out the big guns. They’re going to turn places like Kyiv and other cities in Ukraine into rubble. It will be like Fallujah, Mosul, Grozny.’’ [He] argued Western intervention would be pointless because Russia would level Ukraine and go nuclear against the West…”

    So much for “spot on and years in advance”. If you’re that cued into his pronouncements, you might have at least bothered to spell ol’ Mearscheimer’s name right.

    •�Agree: Bardon Kaldian
    •�Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
    @HA

    Mearsheimer: For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emD1cN2xEz4

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfdR3zA8KME
    , @Curle
    @HA

    Now remind us of your predictions of Ukrainian dominance, or did you think we’d forgotten? How about an update? Exactly when do you anticipate Ukraine dominating in the conflict?

    Replies: @HA
    , @mulga mumblebrain
    @HA

    Russia isn't 'conquering' The Ukraine-it's liberating it.

    Replies: @HA
  431. @HA
    @J.Ross

    "[Mearshimer] just f*cking called all of it spot on and with change, years in advance."

    You mean when he assured us Russia would not invade Ukraine?

    In 2015…[Mearshimer] dismissed the idea that Russia would ever try to ‘’conquer Ukraine’’ — arguing ‘’Putin is much too smart for that.’’
    Here's the actual video of him saying that, with some other relevant context:

    "Russia is a declining great power, and…if they were trying to create a Greater Russia by invading Ukraine…they’d be jumping into the briar patch. In fact, again, if you want to wreck Russia, what you should do is tell them to try and create a greater Russia; it will lead to no end of trouble [and] I think Putin is much too smart for that…."
    Yup, as all the fanboys will loudly agree, Russia is indeed a declining great power. And then, Mearshimer changed gears and assured us that not only would Russia invade, but that Kyiv would be leveled

    Then, in the lead up to the 2022 invasion, [he] argued,…quote…: ‘’What the Russians are going to do is CRUSH the Ukrainians. They’re going to bring out the big guns. They’re going to turn places like Kyiv and other cities in Ukraine into rubble. It will be like Fallujah, Mosul, Grozny.’’ [He] argued Western intervention would be pointless because Russia would level Ukraine and go nuclear against the West…”
    So much for "spot on and years in advance". If you're that cued into his pronouncements, you might have at least bothered to spell ol' Mearscheimer's name right.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian, @Curle, @mulga mumblebrain

    Mearsheimer: For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned.

  432. @Odyssey
    @Mr. Anon

    You probably missed one of my earlier observations/conclusions. There are several groups whose members are all, meaning 100% without a single exception (but without a single one) Russophobes and Putin haters, who support the Ukros. These are Croatian Ustashas, ​​Zionists, Albanian Muslim goatbotherers and faggots. So, now it's easy to conclude what the real issue is.

    Replies: @Mark G., @J.Ross, @Bardon Kaldian

    and faggots

    So…..that’s why you support Russian genocidal invasion?

  433. @Mr. Anon
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Whoopee. An EU thinktank and some Neocon proff don't like Mearsheimer.

    I like him better already.

    I'm not impressed by your "experts".

    Replies: @Odyssey, @Bardon Kaldian

    Confucius: The Superior Man understands what is right, the Inferior Man understands what will sell.

  434. @Odyssey
    @anon

    Totally meaningless. Latin was not a spoken language and no language was born from it. It was a provincial dialect of the province of Lazio that was taken over by the Vatican much later.

    The Dacians, as part of the indigenous peoples of Europe, spoke a Serbian dialect. It was only in the 19th century that the Jesuits, after 300 years of work, invented an artificial Romanian nation with an artificial Romanian language to separate the Russians from the Mediterranean.

    Even after several campaigns of purification, the artificial Romanian (which they call Esperanto based on Serbian) still has a quarter of Serbian words. Some Serbian Dacians (e.g. Galerius) were Roman emperors who built the city of Felix Romuliana in his birthplace in eastern Serbia. Galerius, who was Diocletian's son-in-law, issued an Edict of Tolerance of Christianity in Serdica (today Sophia), two years before Constantine.

    Replies: @Belis60

    “Latin was not a spoken language and no language was born from it”.

    Should we laugh or what? Latin was the language of the Romans, from which Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, French and Rumanian languages are derived. English is the only Germanic language with a 65% of the vocabulary from Latin – thanks to 400 years of Roman occupation of Britain.

    •�LOL: Odyssey
    •�Replies: @anon
    @Belis60

    There is an alternative theory:

    Latin is a language originating from Dacia; ancient Dacian did not vanish mysteriously but is the common ancestor of both Latin and modern Romanian. Dacian, if you will, is Vulgar Latin, which preceded Classical Latin. A likely explanation for the fact that Dacia is also called Romania is that it—rather than Italy—was the original home of the Romans who founded Constantinople.

    That would be consistent with the notion that the Roman language (Latin) remained the administrative language of the Eastern Empire until the sixth century AD, when it was abandoned for Greek, the language spoken by the majority of its subjects. That, in turn, is consistent with the character of Latin itself.

    https://www.unz.com/article/how-fake-is-roman-antiquity/#the-mysterious-origin-of-latin

    Replies: @Odyssey
  435. @Felpudinho
    @Old Prude


    Sorry, shooting down slow moving drones does not count as air to air combat any more than blowing up five trucks makes one an ace...

    ...With medal inflation, today’s military probably sees it differently.
    Speaking of "Medal Inflation," look at the awards decorating the chest of Ukrainian-American fatty, Alexander Vindman. Remember, this is a guy who retired early from the Military because he said he was being bullied too much.

    https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2019/10/Impeachment9-1024x762.jpg

    Replies: @Jim Don Bob, @Curle, @mulga mumblebrain, @nebulafox

    The guy who assigned himself the job of sabotaging the Commander in Chief’s foreign policy? How many medals did Aaron Burr get, granted his violation was much less severe?

    •�Thanks: Felpudinho
    •�Replies: @kaganovitch
    @Curle


    The guy who assigned himself the job of sabotaging the Commander in Chief’s foreign policy? How many medals did Aaron Burr get, granted his violation was much less severe?
    Indeed, I never understood the unstated presumption in the impeachment hearings that some bloated apparatchik in the bowels of the National Security apparat is entitled to his own foreign policy. The cult of 'expertise' is the revenge of Woodrow Wilson.
  436. @HA
    @J.Ross

    "[Mearshimer] just f*cking called all of it spot on and with change, years in advance."

    You mean when he assured us Russia would not invade Ukraine?

    In 2015…[Mearshimer] dismissed the idea that Russia would ever try to ‘’conquer Ukraine’’ — arguing ‘’Putin is much too smart for that.’’
    Here's the actual video of him saying that, with some other relevant context:

    "Russia is a declining great power, and…if they were trying to create a Greater Russia by invading Ukraine…they’d be jumping into the briar patch. In fact, again, if you want to wreck Russia, what you should do is tell them to try and create a greater Russia; it will lead to no end of trouble [and] I think Putin is much too smart for that…."
    Yup, as all the fanboys will loudly agree, Russia is indeed a declining great power. And then, Mearshimer changed gears and assured us that not only would Russia invade, but that Kyiv would be leveled

    Then, in the lead up to the 2022 invasion, [he] argued,…quote…: ‘’What the Russians are going to do is CRUSH the Ukrainians. They’re going to bring out the big guns. They’re going to turn places like Kyiv and other cities in Ukraine into rubble. It will be like Fallujah, Mosul, Grozny.’’ [He] argued Western intervention would be pointless because Russia would level Ukraine and go nuclear against the West…”
    So much for "spot on and years in advance". If you're that cued into his pronouncements, you might have at least bothered to spell ol' Mearscheimer's name right.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian, @Curle, @mulga mumblebrain

    Now remind us of your predictions of Ukrainian dominance, or did you think we’d forgotten? How about an update? Exactly when do you anticipate Ukraine dominating in the conflict?

    •�Replies: @HA
    @Curle

    "Now remind us of your predictions of Ukrainian dominance,..."

    This again? Where specifically did I predict "Ukrainian dominance"? You keep claiming I did that, and insist those predictions are all in my comments for anyone who cares to look, but when I ask for but a single example of such, I get crickets.

    You fanboys are big on the bravado, and boasting about your "spot on" forecasting, but when it comes to follow-through and substantiation, you're pathetic and weak, and face it -- Putin isn't going to be able to save you from that.
  437. @Curle
    @HA

    Now remind us of your predictions of Ukrainian dominance, or did you think we’d forgotten? How about an update? Exactly when do you anticipate Ukraine dominating in the conflict?

    Replies: @HA

    “Now remind us of your predictions of Ukrainian dominance,…”

    This again? Where specifically did I predict “Ukrainian dominance”? You keep claiming I did that, and insist those predictions are all in my comments for anyone who cares to look, but when I ask for but a single example of such, I get crickets.

    You fanboys are big on the bravado, and boasting about your “spot on” forecasting, but when it comes to follow-through and substantiation, you’re pathetic and weak, and face it — Putin isn’t going to be able to save you from that.

  438. @Odyssey
    @mc23

    Alexander, Ptolemy, and Cleopatra were NOT Greeks.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    Macedonian.

    •�Replies: @Odyssey
    @Wokechoke

    = Serbs.
  439. @HA
    @J.Ross

    "[Mearshimer] just f*cking called all of it spot on and with change, years in advance."

    You mean when he assured us Russia would not invade Ukraine?

    In 2015…[Mearshimer] dismissed the idea that Russia would ever try to ‘’conquer Ukraine’’ — arguing ‘’Putin is much too smart for that.’’
    Here's the actual video of him saying that, with some other relevant context:

    "Russia is a declining great power, and…if they were trying to create a Greater Russia by invading Ukraine…they’d be jumping into the briar patch. In fact, again, if you want to wreck Russia, what you should do is tell them to try and create a greater Russia; it will lead to no end of trouble [and] I think Putin is much too smart for that…."
    Yup, as all the fanboys will loudly agree, Russia is indeed a declining great power. And then, Mearshimer changed gears and assured us that not only would Russia invade, but that Kyiv would be leveled

    Then, in the lead up to the 2022 invasion, [he] argued,…quote…: ‘’What the Russians are going to do is CRUSH the Ukrainians. They’re going to bring out the big guns. They’re going to turn places like Kyiv and other cities in Ukraine into rubble. It will be like Fallujah, Mosul, Grozny.’’ [He] argued Western intervention would be pointless because Russia would level Ukraine and go nuclear against the West…”
    So much for "spot on and years in advance". If you're that cued into his pronouncements, you might have at least bothered to spell ol' Mearscheimer's name right.

    Replies: @Bardon Kaldian, @Curle, @mulga mumblebrain

    Russia isn’t ‘conquering’ The Ukraine-it’s liberating it.

    •�Replies: @HA
    @mulga mumblebrain

    "Russia isn’t ‘conquering’ The Ukraine-it’s liberating it."

    https://paradoxoftheday.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/xwar-is-peace.jpg.pagespeed.ic.3E7D6eZ8hL.jpg

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease
  440. @Felpudinho
    @Old Prude


    Sorry, shooting down slow moving drones does not count as air to air combat any more than blowing up five trucks makes one an ace...

    ...With medal inflation, today’s military probably sees it differently.
    Speaking of "Medal Inflation," look at the awards decorating the chest of Ukrainian-American fatty, Alexander Vindman. Remember, this is a guy who retired early from the Military because he said he was being bullied too much.

    https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2019/10/Impeachment9-1024x762.jpg

    Replies: @Jim Don Bob, @Curle, @mulga mumblebrain, @nebulafox

    Looks like an orc can come in the ‘..fat and sleek-headed..’ variety. The ‘lean and hungry’ are like the hatchet-mouthed female orcess, Fiona Hill.

    •�Replies: @Felpudinho
    @mulga mumblebrain

    Fiona is nice-enough name. Fiona Hill? I didn't expect this:

    http://media2.foxnews.com/BrightCove/694940094001/2019/11/21/694940094001_6107095806001_6107091843001-vs.jpg?pubId=694940094001
  441. @Bardon Kaldian
    @Mr. Anon

    Stephen Kotkin, Dan Schueftan, Francis Fukuyama, even the late Kissinger are/were not Russian apologists.

    Mearsheimer is anything but clear-headed; he's simply a deranged person with a deranged world-view.

    https://euideas.eui.eu/2022/07/11/john-mearsheimers-lecture-on-ukraine-why-he-is-wrong-and-what-are-the-consequences/

    John Mearsheimer’s lecture on Ukraine: Why he is wrong and what are the consequences


    https://www.newstatesman.com/world/europe/2023/10/john-mearsheimers-incorrect-views-on-everything

    What John Mearsheimer gets wrong about Ukraine

    https://blog.prif.org/2023/07/26/russian-self-defense-fact-checking-arguments-on-the-russo-ukrainian-war-by-john-j-mearsheimer-and-others/

    “Russian Self-Defense”? Fact-Checking Arguments on the Russo-Ukrainian War by John J. Mearsheimer and Others

    https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/auk-2022-2033/html?lang=en&srsltid=AfmBOooB452zUPuj4DykRZVnxM-LXy5pefsnuza9wezAUs_D35VxWk4i

    Realism after Ukraine: A Critique of Geopolitical Reason from Monroe to Mearsheimer

    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/01402390.2024.2379395?needAccess=true

    Understanding Russia’s war against Ukraine: Political, eschatological and cataclysmic dimensions

    https://polispandit.com/john-mearsheimer-is-wrong-about-putin/

    Why John Mearsheimer Is Dangerously Wrong About Putin


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaJ9VZorgjM

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTXEmz6nJGk

    Replies: @Mr. Anon, @J.Ross, @mulga mumblebrain

    I’d say that Kotkin, a FANATIC Russophobe (a good career move) in my opinion is a pile of shite, but that would be insulting to faeces.

  442. @Wokechoke
    @Odyssey

    Macedonian.

    Replies: @Odyssey

    = Serbs.

  443. @Curle
    @Felpudinho

    The guy who assigned himself the job of sabotaging the Commander in Chief’s foreign policy? How many medals did Aaron Burr get, granted his violation was much less severe?

    Replies: @kaganovitch

    The guy who assigned himself the job of sabotaging the Commander in Chief’s foreign policy? How many medals did Aaron Burr get, granted his violation was much less severe?

    Indeed, I never understood the unstated presumption in the impeachment hearings that some bloated apparatchik in the bowels of the National Security apparat is entitled to his own foreign policy. The cult of ‘expertise’ is the revenge of Woodrow Wilson.

    •�Agree: Felpudinho
    •�Thanks: Buzz Mohawk, Curle
  444. anon[357] •�Disclaimer says:
    @Belis60
    @Odyssey

    "Latin was not a spoken language and no language was born from it".

    Should we laugh or what? Latin was the language of the Romans, from which Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, French and Rumanian languages are derived. English is the only Germanic language with a 65% of the vocabulary from Latin - thanks to 400 years of Roman occupation of Britain.

    Replies: @anon

    There is an alternative theory:

    Latin is a language originating from Dacia; ancient Dacian did not vanish mysteriously but is the common ancestor of both Latin and modern Romanian. Dacian, if you will, is Vulgar Latin, which preceded Classical Latin. A likely explanation for the fact that Dacia is also called Romania is that it—rather than Italy—was the original home of the Romans who founded Constantinople.

    That would be consistent with the notion that the Roman language (Latin) remained the administrative language of the Eastern Empire until the sixth century AD, when it was abandoned for Greek, the language spoken by the majority of its subjects. That, in turn, is consistent with the character of Latin itself.

    https://www.unz.com/article/how-fake-is-roman-antiquity/#the-mysterious-origin-of-latin

    •�Replies: @Odyssey
    @anon

    Who is the bigger dumbass, you or Belis?
  445. @Jack D
    @James B. Shearer

    The NPD (as close as Germany gets to a neo-Nazi party) has never received more than 5% of the vote and the current estimate of its membership is 3,000 people:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Democratic_Party_of_Germany

    Remember that the Nazi Party itself was once small enough that the entire membership could fit in a beerhall. The best thing to do with fascist movements is to strangle them in their cradle. If you wait until they are large and powerful it may be too late.

    Again I emphasize that free speech laws are somewhat different in Europe. Americans are uncomfortable with the idea of outlawing dangerous ideologies or anything speech related, but Europe doesn't have the same qualms. This is not because they are undemocratic - they just have slightly different traditions. I like our First Amendment but I understand why other nations might balance free speech and the danger to society from extremists in a different way given their history vs ours.

    Replies: @Colin Wright, @Art Deco

    Remember that the Nazi Party itself was once small enough that the entire membership could fit in a beerhall. The best thing to do with fascist movements is to strangle them in their cradle. If you wait until they are large and powerful it may be too late.
    ==
    Political movements don’t spread like kudzu or breed like the tribbles.
    ==
    The Nazi leadership committed actual criminal acts in 1923 and the German courts were quite slatternly in dealing with them. Hitler was paroled after less than a year and Gen. Ludendorff received no punishment at all.
    ==
    Disorderly conduct, incitement to riot, harassment, assault and menacing, civil defamation &c can all be addressed by the courts and the police. If they are diligent and professional. They could not be bothered in Bavaria in 1923 and, by and large, they cannot be bothered in blue states today in re the real sources of disorder.
    ==
    Please recall that the median performance of volkisch parties in Germany during the period running from 1890 to 1918 was about 2.0%. Between 1918 and 1929 it was about 3%. I’m assured by a German history maven I correspond with that much of the volkisch vote was concealed in the National People’s Party’s performance; inconsistent with that thesis was the actual performance of the National People’s Party: the more volkisch their leadership, the worse their vote totals.
    ==
    Here’s a thesis: the Nazi Party, ca. 1931, was a fad movement, rather like the KKK in the United States ca. 1922. Their level of support was something very particular to time and place and would have evaporated as quickly as it appeared.
    ==
    The German establishment managed to lose the war and presided over considerable domestic hardship during and after. The Weimar parties (1) manufactured a structurally defective political order and (b) followed madcap monetary policy during 1922-23. Then the Weimar ministries declined in 1930-32 to devalue the currency, permit low-level inflation, run a deficit, or do much to erect work relief programs. You can see how this worked out for everyone.
    ==
    They did not need to ‘strangle’ the Nazi Party. They needed to (1) punish criminals and (2) stop making bad decisions in the realm of fiscal and monetary policy.

    •�Replies: @nebulafox
    @Art Deco

    > The German establishment managed to lose the war and presided over considerable domestic hardship during and after.

    There was a permanent loss of legitimacy in 1918 that was never recovered. The Nazis were proof of this. Hitler himself was anything but shy about his contempt for the “ineptitude” of the ancien regime, he wasn’t entirely wrong, and a big part of why the army couldn’t just overthrow Hitler as time went on was that a lot of the younger generation of officer found his vision of militant class reconciliation more compelling than the failed views of their elders.

    Hindenburg was one of the few exceptions as the man who helped save Germany from the Tsar’s hordes in 1914 and supposedly did not ascent to military decisions in 1917 and 1918 that were what really doomed her. He was a lot more Wilhelm I than Wilhelm II, so the system managed to stabilize briefly between his rise to power and the Depression with him playing the “coordination” role that Wilhelm II was so inept at.

    > They did not need to ‘strangle’ the Nazi Party. They needed to (1) punish criminals and (2) stop making bad decisions in the realm of fiscal and monetary policy.

    I’d split this up into three phases:

    1) Prior to 1924, the federal government in Berlin was powerless to seriously punish certain kinds of terrorists (and make no mistake, that’s what the Nazis were prior to the Beer Hall Putsch), for a whole host of reasons. The Bavarian government enjoyed a wide degree of autonomy, did long before 1914. The judiciary would have done their thing even in better times.

    (Note that already by 1923, Hitler isn’t behaving like your garden variety putschist in how he handles the French occupation of the Ruhr. I don’t think the KKK ever produced someone with that level of political skill. It’s the same reason why people were shocked Stalin beat Trotsky or FDR managed to reshape DC to his liking: *political skill matters*, especially in the 1930s where mass technology, mass politics, and a bent to idealism and Caesarism are all melding.)

    2) Between 1924 and 1930, Hitler was a fringe crank in a political culture not lacking for them.

    3) By the 1930s, he had a lot more men under his control than the army did, and to a man in the higher ranks they had combat experience. Crushing him by force risked civil war (which some generals-Blaskowitz-openly contemplated doing) that any one of Germany’s neighbors could have taken advantage of, to say nothing of the other militants out there. The Reichswehr’s power was as a nucleus from which a most excellent army could be built around in the future, but not as the fully finished product.

    As for the financial decisions, what would you have the Weimar politicians do differently? Stressemann’s strategy was probably the best one on the table. Not his fault the Depression came knocking right when he died, but if he’d lived… how would he have handled it? The real failure was in political will and in the gross underestimation (and a fundamental misreading) of Hitler in late 1932.
  446. @Anonymous
    @jb

    For whatever reason, Black Africans were never sea fearers - perhaps this is down to deep atavistic fears that often have a real hold on the African mind, taboos which cause a real mental paralysis, which are most often seen today in matters involving superstition. In short, the open sea held a real inhibiting terror for Africans. It is curious to note that Africans never sailed to the various Portuguese colonised islands lying relatively near to the west African coast. Neither did they reach Madagascar lying off the east African coast, which was settled by Micronesians, sailing from the other side of the world.
    So it is unlikely that black Africans would haver ever crossed the Mediterranean under their own volition.

    Replies: @Corvinus

    The statement that Africans “didn’t sail” is inaccurate; historical evidence shows that Africans did engage in seafaring activities, particularly along the coasts of their continent, but the extent of their long-distance voyages was often limited due to factors like geographical challenges, technological constraints, and the focus on local trade networks within Africa, unlike the large-scale European exploration voyages across oceans. Jared Diamond discussed it on his seminal work.

    •�Replies: @trevor
    @Corvinus

    Virtually all history of "Africans" sailing is Egyptians and other North Africans.

    Sub-Sahara Africans have virtually no sailing history (except maybe occasional primitive canoe type crafts that were limited to river and coastal fishing and never used for exploration).

    They did not even reach Madagascar just off their East Coast. In fact, Madagascar was colonized by South East Asians and Austronesisns.

    Read sources other than Jared Diamond. While interesting, he presents a somewhat different viewpoint than others that is more "politically correct".

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Corvinus
  447. @mulga mumblebrain
    @HA

    Russia isn't 'conquering' The Ukraine-it's liberating it.

    Replies: @HA

    “Russia isn’t ‘conquering’ The Ukraine-it’s liberating it.”

    •�Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @HA

    You know what's really just too, too "1984"?

    Retards quoting "1984".

    Replies: @HA
  448. @Mark G.
    @Odyssey

    Thank you. Calling a foreign leader a threat to America often in reality is based on traditional ethnic or religious hatreds of the person making the claim. In the past immigrants were expected to leave their traditional ethnic and religious hatreds behind in the old country and focus on being good Americans.

    Just a desire to extract mineral, agricultural or other resources from a country also often is behind some foreign land being identified as a place we must occupy to bring world peace. A third driver is the Military-Industrial Complex and its desire for profits. Wars are good for the MIC.

    With two large oceans on each side of us and by far the largest military on the planet, there is little threat of a foreign invasion. Military spending could be cut in half and it would still be enough to defend the country. That would not be a large enough military, though, to fight wars around the planet for other reasons.

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease, @BB753

    “With two large oceans on each side of us and by far the largest military on the planet, there is little threat of a foreign invasion. ”

    No, America has no longer the largest military on the planet. That’d be more military bases than any other country, but not the largest military by any stretch of the imagination.

  449. @HA
    @mulga mumblebrain

    "Russia isn’t ‘conquering’ The Ukraine-it’s liberating it."

    https://paradoxoftheday.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/xwar-is-peace.jpg.pagespeed.ic.3E7D6eZ8hL.jpg

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease

    You know what’s really just too, too “1984”?

    Retards quoting “1984”.

    •�Replies: @HA
    @The Germ Theory of Disease

    "You know what’s really just too, too '1984'?"

    Ah yes -- Moscow fanboys getting their panties in a twist because someone quoted 1984. That shoe really fits.

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease
  450. @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @HA

    You know what's really just too, too "1984"?

    Retards quoting "1984".

    Replies: @HA

    “You know what’s really just too, too ‘1984’?”

    Ah yes — Moscow fanboys getting their panties in a twist because someone quoted 1984. That shoe really fits.

    •�Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease
    @HA

    WHOOOOOSH!!!


    Ahem.

    Like I was saying, concerning retards....


    -- Use the word "heterogeneous" in a sentence.

    -- Don't you talk down to me! I *know* what the word "heterogeneous" means!

    -- All right, then. Use the word "heterogeneous" in a sentence.

    -- Uh, um... [LONG AWKWARD SILENCE]

    Remind you of anyone?
  451. @HA
    @The Germ Theory of Disease

    "You know what’s really just too, too '1984'?"

    Ah yes -- Moscow fanboys getting their panties in a twist because someone quoted 1984. That shoe really fits.

    Replies: @The Germ Theory of Disease

    WHOOOOOSH!!!

    Ahem.

    Like I was saying, concerning retards….

    — Use the word “heterogeneous” in a sentence.

    — Don’t you talk down to me! I *know* what the word “heterogeneous” means!

    — All right, then. Use the word “heterogeneous” in a sentence.

    — Uh, um… [LONG AWKWARD SILENCE]

    Remind you of anyone?

  452. @Corvinus
    @Anonymous

    The statement that Africans "didn't sail" is inaccurate; historical evidence shows that Africans did engage in seafaring activities, particularly along the coasts of their continent, but the extent of their long-distance voyages was often limited due to factors like geographical challenges, technological constraints, and the focus on local trade networks within Africa, unlike the large-scale European exploration voyages across oceans. Jared Diamond discussed it on his seminal work.

    Replies: @trevor

    Virtually all history of “Africans” sailing is Egyptians and other North Africans.

    Sub-Sahara Africans have virtually no sailing history (except maybe occasional primitive canoe type crafts that were limited to river and coastal fishing and never used for exploration).

    They did not even reach Madagascar just off their East Coast. In fact, Madagascar was colonized by South East Asians and Austronesisns.

    Read sources other than Jared Diamond. While interesting, he presents a somewhat different viewpoint than others that is more “politically correct”.

    •�Replies: @Steve Sailer
    @trevor

    Sub-Saharans appear to have settled Fernando Po island about 20 miles off the coast of West Africa.

    Replies: @anon
    , @Corvinus
    @trevor

    “Virtually all history of “Africans” sailing is Egyptians and other North Africans.”

    It’s other than surprising given its proximity to the Mediterranean.

    “Sub-Sahara Africans have virtually no sailing history”

    You mean long distance sailing history. Be more precise.

    “except maybe occasional primitive canoe type crafts that were limited to river and coastal fishing”

    Primitive? No.

    https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-african-history/article/abs/canoe-in-west-african-history1/F4B4B9711F5C45B1106DA09FB635BD54

    “Read sources other than Jared Diamond. While interesting, he presents a somewhat different viewpoint than others that is more “politically correct”.”

    No, he presents a plethora of evidence as to how and why Africans did not sail like Europeans. You really need to open up your mind here.

    Replies: @trevor, @Wokechoke, @Colin Wright
  453. @mulga mumblebrain
    @Felpudinho

    Looks like an orc can come in the '..fat and sleek-headed..' variety. The 'lean and hungry' are like the hatchet-mouthed female orcess, Fiona Hill.

    Replies: @Felpudinho

    Fiona is nice-enough name. Fiona Hill? I didn’t expect this:

  454. @anon
    @Belis60

    There is an alternative theory:

    Latin is a language originating from Dacia; ancient Dacian did not vanish mysteriously but is the common ancestor of both Latin and modern Romanian. Dacian, if you will, is Vulgar Latin, which preceded Classical Latin. A likely explanation for the fact that Dacia is also called Romania is that it—rather than Italy—was the original home of the Romans who founded Constantinople.

    That would be consistent with the notion that the Roman language (Latin) remained the administrative language of the Eastern Empire until the sixth century AD, when it was abandoned for Greek, the language spoken by the majority of its subjects. That, in turn, is consistent with the character of Latin itself.

    https://www.unz.com/article/how-fake-is-roman-antiquity/#the-mysterious-origin-of-latin

    Replies: @Odyssey

    Who is the bigger dumbass, you or Belis?

  455. @trevor
    @Corvinus

    Virtually all history of "Africans" sailing is Egyptians and other North Africans.

    Sub-Sahara Africans have virtually no sailing history (except maybe occasional primitive canoe type crafts that were limited to river and coastal fishing and never used for exploration).

    They did not even reach Madagascar just off their East Coast. In fact, Madagascar was colonized by South East Asians and Austronesisns.

    Read sources other than Jared Diamond. While interesting, he presents a somewhat different viewpoint than others that is more "politically correct".

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Corvinus

    Sub-Saharans appear to have settled Fernando Po island about 20 miles off the coast of West Africa.

    •�Replies: @anon
    @Steve Sailer

    20 miles is about the same as the width of the English Channel.

    But Sub-Saharans also settled Southern Europe more than 10,000 years ago, so they must have been seafaring then?

    Or is it more plausible that this gene flow from sub Saharan Africa to Europe actually originated in North Africa?


    Phylogeographic analyses showed that ∼65% of the European L lineages most likely arrived in rather recent historical times, including the Romanization period, the Arab conquest of the Iberian Peninsula and Sicily, and during the period of the Atlantic slave trade. However, the remaining 35% of L mtDNAs form European-specific subclades, revealing that there was gene flow from sub-Saharan Africa toward Europe as early as 11,000 yr ago.

    A large proportion (65%) of the African-European mtDNAs investigated could be attributed to modern and well-documented demographic routes that existed during the Romanization period, the Arab conquest, and the trans-Atlantic slave trade. However, there is strong evidence pointing to the fact that the remaining 35% of the L-European mtDNAs stand as modern witnesses of sporadic population movements occurring between the two continents that might have begun as early as 11,000 yr ago (Fig. 5). These contacts were not only restricted to North Africa, but connected sub-Saharan regions to Europe directly via coastal routes or first crossing North African territories toward the Mediterranean Sea.
    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3337428/

    The origin of sub-Saharan African mtDNAs in Europe (including Italian samples) has been recently investigated by Cerezo et al. ; the results indicate that a significant proportion of these lineages could have arrived in Italy more than 10,000 years ago; therefore, their presence in Europe does not necessarily date to the time of the Roman Empire, the Atlantic slave trade or to modern migration.
    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3519480/

    Lastly, three recent studies highlight the possibility of genetic exchange between Europe and Africa. Moorjani et al. (9) estimated that about 1–3% of recent Sub-Saharan African ancestry is present in multiple southern European populations; Cerezo et al. (23) find evidence of older (11,000 ya) Sub-Saharan gene flow toward Europe based on mtDNA genomes; and Auton et al. (8) found that short haplotypes were shared between the Yoruban Nigerians and southwestern Europeans. However, given the geographic barrier imposed by the Sahara Desert between North Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa, and the proximity of North Africa to Europe, it is plausible that gene flow from Africa to Europe actually originated in North Africa https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.1306223110

    Many haplogroups of extra-European origin were found in our samples The presence of these lineages is probably due to Southern Italy’s central position in the Mediterranean basin, which facilitated the introduction of foreign lineages.
    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/03014460903198509

  456. anon[163] •�Disclaimer says:
    @Steve Sailer
    @trevor

    Sub-Saharans appear to have settled Fernando Po island about 20 miles off the coast of West Africa.

    Replies: @anon

    20 miles is about the same as the width of the English Channel.

    But Sub-Saharans also settled Southern Europe more than 10,000 years ago, so they must have been seafaring then?

    Or is it more plausible that this gene flow from sub Saharan Africa to Europe actually originated in North Africa?

    Phylogeographic analyses showed that ∼65% of the European L lineages most likely arrived in rather recent historical times, including the Romanization period, the Arab conquest of the Iberian Peninsula and Sicily, and during the period of the Atlantic slave trade. However, the remaining 35% of L mtDNAs form European-specific subclades, revealing that there was gene flow from sub-Saharan Africa toward Europe as early as 11,000 yr ago.

    A large proportion (65%) of the African-European mtDNAs investigated could be attributed to modern and well-documented demographic routes that existed during the Romanization period, the Arab conquest, and the trans-Atlantic slave trade. However, there is strong evidence pointing to the fact that the remaining 35% of the L-European mtDNAs stand as modern witnesses of sporadic population movements occurring between the two continents that might have begun as early as 11,000 yr ago (Fig. 5). These contacts were not only restricted to North Africa, but connected sub-Saharan regions to Europe directly via coastal routes or first crossing North African territories toward the Mediterranean Sea.
    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3337428/

    The origin of sub-Saharan African mtDNAs in Europe (including Italian samples) has been recently investigated by Cerezo et al. ; the results indicate that a significant proportion of these lineages could have arrived in Italy more than 10,000 years ago; therefore, their presence in Europe does not necessarily date to the time of the Roman Empire, the Atlantic slave trade or to modern migration.
    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3519480/

    Lastly, three recent studies highlight the possibility of genetic exchange between Europe and Africa. Moorjani et al. (9) estimated that about 1–3% of recent Sub-Saharan African ancestry is present in multiple southern European populations; Cerezo et al. (23) find evidence of older (11,000 ya) Sub-Saharan gene flow toward Europe based on mtDNA genomes; and Auton et al. (8) found that short haplotypes were shared between the Yoruban Nigerians and southwestern Europeans. However, given the geographic barrier imposed by the Sahara Desert between North Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa, and the proximity of North Africa to Europe, it is plausible that gene flow from Africa to Europe actually originated in North Africa https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.1306223110

    Many haplogroups of extra-European origin were found in our samples The presence of these lineages is probably due to Southern Italy’s central position in the Mediterranean basin, which facilitated the introduction of foreign lineages.
    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/03014460903198509

  457. anonymous[200] •�Disclaimer says:
    @the one they call Desanex

    For example, New Zealand Maori character actor Cliff Curtis can plausibly play Arabs and Mexicans. (Presumably, there are also Mexicans and Arabs who likewise can get by credibly as Maoris.)
    In the 1968 film The Shoes of the Fisherman, Mexican actor Anthony Quinn played a Russian pope. He spoke in a Hollywood all-purpose foreign accent, replacing ‘r’s with ‘l’s, as in “Chlist was clowned with thorns.” When told he couldn’t do something, he said “I want to tly.”

    Replies: @Rapparee, @anonymous

    That film made sure to blame communist suppression on Russians. There is a scene where he prays with some jews because he learned from a rabbi while in a gulag.

    Likewise, in Firefox, Clint Eastwood says to a Soviet citizen, “what is it with you jews anyway? Don’t you ever get tired of fighting city hall?”
    Deceptively hiding the fact that they ran the Soviet city hall.

  458. @trevor
    @Corvinus

    Virtually all history of "Africans" sailing is Egyptians and other North Africans.

    Sub-Sahara Africans have virtually no sailing history (except maybe occasional primitive canoe type crafts that were limited to river and coastal fishing and never used for exploration).

    They did not even reach Madagascar just off their East Coast. In fact, Madagascar was colonized by South East Asians and Austronesisns.

    Read sources other than Jared Diamond. While interesting, he presents a somewhat different viewpoint than others that is more "politically correct".

    Replies: @Steve Sailer, @Corvinus

    “Virtually all history of “Africans” sailing is Egyptians and other North Africans.”

    It’s other than surprising given its proximity to the Mediterranean.

    “Sub-Sahara Africans have virtually no sailing history”

    You mean long distance sailing history. Be more precise.

    “except maybe occasional primitive canoe type crafts that were limited to river and coastal fishing”

    Primitive? No.

    https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-african-history/article/abs/canoe-in-west-african-history1/F4B4B9711F5C45B1106DA09FB635BD54

    “Read sources other than Jared Diamond. While interesting, he presents a somewhat different viewpoint than others that is more “politically correct”.”

    No, he presents a plethora of evidence as to how and why Africans did not sail like Europeans. You really need to open up your mind here.

    •�Replies: @trevor
    @Corvinus


    "It’s other than surprising given its proximity to the Mediterranean."
    Who said it was surprising? I didn't. Must be you.

    "You mean long distance sailing history. Be more precise."
    I said "...limited to river and coastal fishing and never used for exploration)."

    That means long distance to you? Fishing is short distance.

    "Primitive? No."

    https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-african-history/article/abs/canoe-in-west-african-history1/F4B4B9711F5C45B1106DA09FB635BD54
    Dugout canoes look primitive to me. Compare them to Egyptian vessels of the same period.

    "No, he presents a plethora of evidence as to how and why Africans did not sail like Europeans"
    I meant that Jared Taylor says more politically correct things like Africans never developed civilization not because of low IQ and other abilities as most understand to be the case, but because of environmental constraints.

    The excuse " unnavigable rivers" is a red herring. Africa has the same seacoast as Europeans.
    .

    .
    I was merely expanding on your original post. I don't think I was critical of you, but you have chosen to attack me and try to pick apart my post.

    You are being unnecessarily argumentative and seem to lack reading comprehension abilities. Did you ride that short bus when you were in school?

    You really need to take some remedial reading, writing, and logic classes as well as counseling appropriate for your distorted mindset.

    Replies: @deep anonymous, @Wokechoke
    , @Wokechoke
    @Corvinus

    The distance between west Africa and Brazil is very short. Even an outrigger driven off course could have made the trip. But of course never did. Outriggers have no curiosity.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer
    , @Colin Wright
    @Corvinus


    'No, he presents a plethora of evidence as to how and why Africans did not sail like Europeans. You really need to open up your mind here.'
    I'd say what he does is present facile and ultimately indefensible rationalizations for the failure of some to advance where others did.

    It's just the opposite of what you imply. Reading Jared Diamond allows one to retain a comforting, egalitarian view of the world. Wouldn't it be nice if it were so?
  459. @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    @Coconuts


    You seemed to be challenging the idea that contemporary white Europeans should claim the Roman heritage solely for themselves
    The problem is claiming Greco-Roman as “white” and “European”, which is both false and anachronistic.

    Greece and Rome are offshoots of ancient civilisations of eastern Mediterranean, not northern Europe.

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/35/Culture_of_Antiquity.png

    That will lead on to people in various parts of Europe realising that they are also likely to be descendants of one time inhabitants of the Roman Empire.
    Culturally yes.

    Genetically, descendants of Herman, by definition, cannot be descendants of Romans. Neither are descendants of Britons who revolted against the Romans:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boudica

    Descendants of Vercingétorix can be said to genetic descendants of Roman subjects. But so are many people of MENA background in Europe.

    As I said in my post I suspect a lot of it is related to religion.
    Sure. But legendary heroes during 19th CE Romantic nationalism period were pagan. Wagner didn’t compose operas about Constantine’s conversion.

    And who is the intellectual hero for RWers? Nietzsche, what did he say about Christianity's impact on Rome? That it was a slave morality that corrupted it.

    What is the country that actually preserves the authentic version of Christianity that Romans converted to? Russia-- whether it is part of Europe is debatable.

    The version of Christianity observed in the NW Europe, specifically became of as a criticism and reform toward Roman Catholicism, from Luther to the Puritans.

    Precisely because NW Euros were since the beginning, on the margins of the Roman world.

    Replies: @Odyssey, @Jenner Ickham Errican, @nebulafox

    > The problem is claiming Greco-Roman as “white” and “European”, which is both false and anachronistic.

    Quite right. Christianity, for its part, fused Rome and Greece with Judea and Persia, and the term itself was coined in Antioch, Syria: the capital of the Roman East.

    Almost like God knew His odds well.

    > That it was a slave morality that corrupted it.

    That slave morality was how he could even learn about the ancients after the civilizational collapse.

    > Precisely because NW Euros were since the beginning, on the margins of the Roman world.

    So were the Turks, and they became Kaisers of Rome. The men who revived Rome in the 3rd Century were Balkan peasant soldiers. Not too different from how Emperor Wen, the product of the mix of Han and steppe peoples, stitched together a new China after centuries of disunity. It ain’t about the pedigree, never was. It’s about the legitimacy. That can come in any number of ways.

    In any case, I’ve always noticed that third-culture frontier children can have a dedication and appreciated that those born in the metropole lack.

  460. @Art Deco
    @Jack D

    Remember that the Nazi Party itself was once small enough that the entire membership could fit in a beerhall. The best thing to do with fascist movements is to strangle them in their cradle. If you wait until they are large and powerful it may be too late.
    ==
    Political movements don't spread like kudzu or breed like the tribbles.
    ==
    The Nazi leadership committed actual criminal acts in 1923 and the German courts were quite slatternly in dealing with them. Hitler was paroled after less than a year and Gen. Ludendorff received no punishment at all.
    ==
    Disorderly conduct, incitement to riot, harassment, assault and menacing, civil defamation &c can all be addressed by the courts and the police. If they are diligent and professional. They could not be bothered in Bavaria in 1923 and, by and large, they cannot be bothered in blue states today in re the real sources of disorder.
    ==
    Please recall that the median performance of volkisch parties in Germany during the period running from 1890 to 1918 was about 2.0%. Between 1918 and 1929 it was about 3%. I'm assured by a German history maven I correspond with that much of the volkisch vote was concealed in the National People's Party's performance; inconsistent with that thesis was the actual performance of the National People's Party: the more volkisch their leadership, the worse their vote totals.
    ==
    Here's a thesis: the Nazi Party, ca. 1931, was a fad movement, rather like the KKK in the United States ca. 1922. Their level of support was something very particular to time and place and would have evaporated as quickly as it appeared.
    ==
    The German establishment managed to lose the war and presided over considerable domestic hardship during and after. The Weimar parties (1) manufactured a structurally defective political order and (b) followed madcap monetary policy during 1922-23. Then the Weimar ministries declined in 1930-32 to devalue the currency, permit low-level inflation, run a deficit, or do much to erect work relief programs. You can see how this worked out for everyone.
    ==
    They did not need to 'strangle' the Nazi Party. They needed to (1) punish criminals and (2) stop making bad decisions in the realm of fiscal and monetary policy.

    Replies: @nebulafox

    > The German establishment managed to lose the war and presided over considerable domestic hardship during and after.

    There was a permanent loss of legitimacy in 1918 that was never recovered. The Nazis were proof of this. Hitler himself was anything but shy about his contempt for the “ineptitude” of the ancien regime, he wasn’t entirely wrong, and a big part of why the army couldn’t just overthrow Hitler as time went on was that a lot of the younger generation of officer found his vision of militant class reconciliation more compelling than the failed views of their elders.

    Hindenburg was one of the few exceptions as the man who helped save Germany from the Tsar’s hordes in 1914 and supposedly did not ascent to military decisions in 1917 and 1918 that were what really doomed her. He was a lot more Wilhelm I than Wilhelm II, so the system managed to stabilize briefly between his rise to power and the Depression with him playing the “coordination” role that Wilhelm II was so inept at.

    > They did not need to ‘strangle’ the Nazi Party. They needed to (1) punish criminals and (2) stop making bad decisions in the realm of fiscal and monetary policy.

    I’d split this up into three phases:

    1) Prior to 1924, the federal government in Berlin was powerless to seriously punish certain kinds of terrorists (and make no mistake, that’s what the Nazis were prior to the Beer Hall Putsch), for a whole host of reasons. The Bavarian government enjoyed a wide degree of autonomy, did long before 1914. The judiciary would have done their thing even in better times.

    (Note that already by 1923, Hitler isn’t behaving like your garden variety putschist in how he handles the French occupation of the Ruhr. I don’t think the KKK ever produced someone with that level of political skill. It’s the same reason why people were shocked Stalin beat Trotsky or FDR managed to reshape DC to his liking: *political skill matters*, especially in the 1930s where mass technology, mass politics, and a bent to idealism and Caesarism are all melding.)

    2) Between 1924 and 1930, Hitler was a fringe crank in a political culture not lacking for them.

    3) By the 1930s, he had a lot more men under his control than the army did, and to a man in the higher ranks they had combat experience. Crushing him by force risked civil war (which some generals-Blaskowitz-openly contemplated doing) that any one of Germany’s neighbors could have taken advantage of, to say nothing of the other militants out there. The Reichswehr’s power was as a nucleus from which a most excellent army could be built around in the future, but not as the fully finished product.

    As for the financial decisions, what would you have the Weimar politicians do differently? Stressemann’s strategy was probably the best one on the table. Not his fault the Depression came knocking right when he died, but if he’d lived… how would he have handled it? The real failure was in political will and in the gross underestimation (and a fundamental misreading) of Hitler in late 1932.

  461. @Felpudinho
    @Old Prude


    Sorry, shooting down slow moving drones does not count as air to air combat any more than blowing up five trucks makes one an ace...

    ...With medal inflation, today’s military probably sees it differently.
    Speaking of "Medal Inflation," look at the awards decorating the chest of Ukrainian-American fatty, Alexander Vindman. Remember, this is a guy who retired early from the Military because he said he was being bullied too much.

    https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2019/10/Impeachment9-1024x762.jpg

    Replies: @Jim Don Bob, @Curle, @mulga mumblebrain, @nebulafox

    And they wonder why young men don’t want to enlist and why old men are telling their sons not to.

    Seriously, there’s no shortage of guys unwilling to be trained (and unwilling to give up games and virtual pussy, especially if that means the real thing) in the art of slaughtering cartel assholes on the border or learning how nuclear submarines can be built and operated. You know, stuff the US military should be doing, and one where they’d be willing to tolerate wackiness in exchange for competence and seriousness. There’s a serious shortage of men willing to die for Biden’s Ukrainian bribes or who want to learn how to make PowerPoints on the dangers of flyover kids going off to spy for the PRC or Israel.

    The Bureaucrats and REMFS are the problem.

  462. @Corvinus
    @trevor

    “Virtually all history of “Africans” sailing is Egyptians and other North Africans.”

    It’s other than surprising given its proximity to the Mediterranean.

    “Sub-Sahara Africans have virtually no sailing history”

    You mean long distance sailing history. Be more precise.

    “except maybe occasional primitive canoe type crafts that were limited to river and coastal fishing”

    Primitive? No.

    https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-african-history/article/abs/canoe-in-west-african-history1/F4B4B9711F5C45B1106DA09FB635BD54

    “Read sources other than Jared Diamond. While interesting, he presents a somewhat different viewpoint than others that is more “politically correct”.”

    No, he presents a plethora of evidence as to how and why Africans did not sail like Europeans. You really need to open up your mind here.

    Replies: @trevor, @Wokechoke, @Colin Wright

    “It’s other than surprising given its proximity to the Mediterranean.”

    Who said it was surprising? I didn’t. Must be you.

    “You mean long distance sailing history. Be more precise.”

    I said “…limited to river and coastal fishing and never used for exploration).”

    That means long distance to you? Fishing is short distance.

    “Primitive? No.”

    https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-african-history/article/abs/canoe-in-west-african-history1/F4B4B9711F5C45B1106DA09FB635BD54

    Dugout canoes look primitive to me. Compare them to Egyptian vessels of the same period.

    “No, he presents a plethora of evidence as to how and why Africans did not sail like Europeans”

    I meant that Jared Taylor says more politically correct things like Africans never developed civilization not because of low IQ and other abilities as most understand to be the case, but because of environmental constraints.

    The excuse ” unnavigable rivers” is a red herring. Africa has the same seacoast as Europeans.
    .

    .
    I was merely expanding on your original post. I don’t think I was critical of you, but you have chosen to attack me and try to pick apart my post.

    You are being unnecessarily argumentative and seem to lack reading comprehension abilities. Did you ride that short bus when you were in school?

    You really need to take some remedial reading, writing, and logic classes as well as counseling appropriate for your distorted mindset.

    •�Disagree: Corvinus
    •�Replies: @deep anonymous
    @trevor

    I'm pretty sure you meant Jared Diamond, not Jared Taylor. Otherwise, I agree with you.
    , @Wokechoke
    @trevor

    A West African sailor could have simply been blown off course and arrived Brazil. None existed.

    Replies: @Truth
  463. @trevor
    @Corvinus


    "It’s other than surprising given its proximity to the Mediterranean."
    Who said it was surprising? I didn't. Must be you.

    "You mean long distance sailing history. Be more precise."
    I said "...limited to river and coastal fishing and never used for exploration)."

    That means long distance to you? Fishing is short distance.

    "Primitive? No."

    https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-african-history/article/abs/canoe-in-west-african-history1/F4B4B9711F5C45B1106DA09FB635BD54
    Dugout canoes look primitive to me. Compare them to Egyptian vessels of the same period.

    "No, he presents a plethora of evidence as to how and why Africans did not sail like Europeans"
    I meant that Jared Taylor says more politically correct things like Africans never developed civilization not because of low IQ and other abilities as most understand to be the case, but because of environmental constraints.

    The excuse " unnavigable rivers" is a red herring. Africa has the same seacoast as Europeans.
    .

    .
    I was merely expanding on your original post. I don't think I was critical of you, but you have chosen to attack me and try to pick apart my post.

    You are being unnecessarily argumentative and seem to lack reading comprehension abilities. Did you ride that short bus when you were in school?

    You really need to take some remedial reading, writing, and logic classes as well as counseling appropriate for your distorted mindset.

    Replies: @deep anonymous, @Wokechoke

    I’m pretty sure you meant Jared Diamond, not Jared Taylor. Otherwise, I agree with you.

  464. @Corvinus
    @trevor

    “Virtually all history of “Africans” sailing is Egyptians and other North Africans.”

    It’s other than surprising given its proximity to the Mediterranean.

    “Sub-Sahara Africans have virtually no sailing history”

    You mean long distance sailing history. Be more precise.

    “except maybe occasional primitive canoe type crafts that were limited to river and coastal fishing”

    Primitive? No.

    https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-african-history/article/abs/canoe-in-west-african-history1/F4B4B9711F5C45B1106DA09FB635BD54

    “Read sources other than Jared Diamond. While interesting, he presents a somewhat different viewpoint than others that is more “politically correct”.”

    No, he presents a plethora of evidence as to how and why Africans did not sail like Europeans. You really need to open up your mind here.

    Replies: @trevor, @Wokechoke, @Colin Wright

    The distance between west Africa and Brazil is very short. Even an outrigger driven off course could have made the trip. But of course never did. Outriggers have no curiosity.

    •�Replies: @Steve Sailer
    @Wokechoke

    1600 miles minimum.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Corvinus
  465. @Wokechoke
    @Corvinus

    The distance between west Africa and Brazil is very short. Even an outrigger driven off course could have made the trip. But of course never did. Outriggers have no curiosity.

    Replies: @Steve Sailer

    1600 miles minimum.

    •�Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Steve Sailer

    That’s not far in nautical terms.

    Easter Island to Chile is 2180 miles. From Tahiti to Easter Island where the humans did arrive from was 2600 miles. Outriggers are not all born to outrigging.
    , @Corvinus
    @Steve Sailer

    Speaking about your articles in Taki's Magazine, as I suspected, your recent post about the Ferguson Effect has its own glaring donut hole.

    It is reasonable to say there is a correlation—less traffic stops by the New Jersey State Police led to more car crashes.

    So as I was reading, I was expecting specific data—after all, you are the self-proclaimed expert pattern recognizer—that would demonstrate that blacks! had been primarily responsible for said crashes. Then, I started to realize the narrative was just a rehash of your thesis, and you window dressed it just enough to make it appear the indeed black! motorists were the culprit.



    What specific areas did the slowdowns occur? Were there particular counties more impacted by this slowdown? In those places where the slowdowns occurred, what is the racial breakdown of those traffic stops? Seems to me this is important to NOTICE

    Now, as you stated, in New Jersey there was a 27 percent increase in crashes in 2023 compared to the previous year. But statistics are required on your part to prove, rather than cagily assume, that blacks! were primarily behind the cause of those crashes. What was the breakdown in fatalities—motorists, pedestrians, cyclists? Furthermore, we know several factors play a role into a county’s tally of deadly crashes, like weather and driver behavior, as well as the number of drivers o the road and the number of highway miles. Seems to me this is important to NOTICE.

    
Will you get away with such a glaring donut hole in your analysis? Not if I have a say about it.

    Replies: @Colin Wright
  466. The Metropolitan show wasn’t about ancient Egyptian art. It was about African-American art which had Egypt as a subject. Was it the organizers’ responsibility to deny or disprove asserted connections between the Egyptians and the African populations to the south? Does a show about French or German or Italian influences on American art have to specify that the people of those countries aren’t American and Americans aren’t all French or German or Italian? Fictive connections and cultural appropriations are common in cultural history. Not having been to the show, I don’t know if it asserts or denies that the ancient Egyptians were dark-skinned, but that wasn’t central to the show’s purpose.

  467. @Steve Sailer
    @Wokechoke

    1600 miles minimum.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Corvinus

    That’s not far in nautical terms.

    Easter Island to Chile is 2180 miles. From Tahiti to Easter Island where the humans did arrive from was 2600 miles. Outriggers are not all born to outrigging.

  468. @trevor
    @Corvinus


    "It’s other than surprising given its proximity to the Mediterranean."
    Who said it was surprising? I didn't. Must be you.

    "You mean long distance sailing history. Be more precise."
    I said "...limited to river and coastal fishing and never used for exploration)."

    That means long distance to you? Fishing is short distance.

    "Primitive? No."

    https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-african-history/article/abs/canoe-in-west-african-history1/F4B4B9711F5C45B1106DA09FB635BD54
    Dugout canoes look primitive to me. Compare them to Egyptian vessels of the same period.

    "No, he presents a plethora of evidence as to how and why Africans did not sail like Europeans"
    I meant that Jared Taylor says more politically correct things like Africans never developed civilization not because of low IQ and other abilities as most understand to be the case, but because of environmental constraints.

    The excuse " unnavigable rivers" is a red herring. Africa has the same seacoast as Europeans.
    .

    .
    I was merely expanding on your original post. I don't think I was critical of you, but you have chosen to attack me and try to pick apart my post.

    You are being unnecessarily argumentative and seem to lack reading comprehension abilities. Did you ride that short bus when you were in school?

    You really need to take some remedial reading, writing, and logic classes as well as counseling appropriate for your distorted mindset.

    Replies: @deep anonymous, @Wokechoke

    A West African sailor could have simply been blown off course and arrived Brazil. None existed.

    •�Replies: @Truth
    @Wokechoke

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8jhb5NnADM
  469. @Wokechoke
    @trevor

    A West African sailor could have simply been blown off course and arrived Brazil. None existed.

    Replies: @Truth

  470. @Steve Sailer
    @Wokechoke

    1600 miles minimum.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Corvinus

    Speaking about your articles in Taki’s Magazine, as I suspected, your recent post about the Ferguson Effect has its own glaring donut hole.

    It is reasonable to say there is a correlation—less traffic stops by the New Jersey State Police led to more car crashes.

    So as I was reading, I was expecting specific data—after all, you are the self-proclaimed expert pattern recognizer—that would demonstrate that blacks! had been primarily responsible for said crashes. Then, I started to realize the narrative was just a rehash of your thesis, and you window dressed it just enough to make it appear the indeed black! motorists were the culprit.



    What specific areas did the slowdowns occur? Were there particular counties more impacted by this slowdown? In those places where the slowdowns occurred, what is the racial breakdown of those traffic stops? Seems to me this is important to NOTICE

    Now, as you stated, in New Jersey there was a 27 percent increase in crashes in 2023 compared to the previous year. But statistics are required on your part to prove, rather than cagily assume, that blacks! were primarily behind the cause of those crashes. What was the breakdown in fatalities—motorists, pedestrians, cyclists? Furthermore, we know several factors play a role into a county’s tally of deadly crashes, like weather and driver behavior, as well as the number of drivers o the road and the number of highway miles. Seems to me this is important to NOTICE.

    
Will you get away with such a glaring donut hole in your analysis? Not if I have a say about it.

    •�Troll: deep anonymous
    •�Replies: @Colin Wright
    @Corvinus


    '...Now, as you stated, in New Jersey there was a 27 percent increase in crashes in 2023 compared to the previous year. But statistics are required on your part to prove, rather than cagily assume, that blacks! were primarily behind the cause of those crashes. What was the breakdown in fatalities—motorists, pedestrians, cyclists? Furthermore, we know several factors play a role into a county’s tally of deadly crashes, like weather and driver behavior, as well as the number of drivers o the road and the number of highway miles. Seems to me this is important to NOTICE...'
    So since Steve has failed to prove black behavior is the only possible explanation for the phenomenon, there's nothing to it? He has to do that before you will recognize that there seems to be a pattern here? More unsupervised boys in the kitchen lead to fewer remaining cookies? Could be other explanations...

    Comically, such reasoning is akin to Holocaust Denial. Since those of us who are quite sure the Holocaust happened can't prove with philosophical certainty that it did, presto! It didn't.

    Replies: @Corvinus
  471. @Corvinus
    @trevor

    “Virtually all history of “Africans” sailing is Egyptians and other North Africans.”

    It’s other than surprising given its proximity to the Mediterranean.

    “Sub-Sahara Africans have virtually no sailing history”

    You mean long distance sailing history. Be more precise.

    “except maybe occasional primitive canoe type crafts that were limited to river and coastal fishing”

    Primitive? No.

    https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-african-history/article/abs/canoe-in-west-african-history1/F4B4B9711F5C45B1106DA09FB635BD54

    “Read sources other than Jared Diamond. While interesting, he presents a somewhat different viewpoint than others that is more “politically correct”.”

    No, he presents a plethora of evidence as to how and why Africans did not sail like Europeans. You really need to open up your mind here.

    Replies: @trevor, @Wokechoke, @Colin Wright

    ‘No, he presents a plethora of evidence as to how and why Africans did not sail like Europeans. You really need to open up your mind here.’

    I’d say what he does is present facile and ultimately indefensible rationalizations for the failure of some to advance where others did.

    It’s just the opposite of what you imply. Reading Jared Diamond allows one to retain a comforting, egalitarian view of the world. Wouldn’t it be nice if it were so?

    •�Disagree: Corvinus
  472. @Jack D
    From the Dept. of Unintentionally Hilarious Headlines:


    Disillusioned by the Election, Some Black Women Are Deciding to Rest
    https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/19/well/black-women-harris-trump-election-rest.html

    I can only imagine the enormous struggle these black women must have gone thru in order to abate their natural inclination toward vigorous hard work.

    Replies: @Mark G., @Isabel Archer, @Colin Wright

    From the Dept. of Unintentionally Hilarious Headlines:

    ‘Disillusioned by the Election, Some Black Women Are Deciding to Rest’

    It’s striking how the establishment ignores reality to simply invent the minority they would prefer was there. The hard-working, politically conscious black woman. The Leftist, Rainbow Flag Hispanic.

    I go to Hawaii, and there you can even get a history of this nonsense. When we wanted the then-Hawaiians to be pious Christians, they were pious Christians. When (say, 1964) we wanted them to be sexy hula dancers, they were sexy hula dancers. Now that we want them to be aggrieved Polynesians, they’re aggrieved Polynesians. Of course, they’ve never been exactly any of these things. These days, they’re not even particularly Polynesian. It’s in the mix, but…

    It would be funny if it weren’t mildly tragic. Dunno about blacks, but both Hispanics and the ‘locals’ on Hawaii have real cultures. They’re just somewhat stunted and malformed by our determined effort to force it into the molds we create for it.

    Take, for example, the ‘wise Hispanic female’ of Sotomayor. Nahh. In my experience (and it’s fairly broad) Hispanic women are often neurotic, compulsive, and capable of self-destructive behavior fully as blatant as that of their white sisters.

    Sometimes, I think a lot of our problems stem from refusing to see what’s actually there. I’ve had perfectly good workers who were fine — until I tried to make them do things they couldn’t.

    Like, calculate a bill. A Labrador Retriever’s a mighty fine animal in most respects — but don’t ask it to be a serious attack dog. If for example we simply accepted who blacks actually were, wouldn’t it work out better all round?

  473. @Corvinus
    @Steve Sailer

    Speaking about your articles in Taki's Magazine, as I suspected, your recent post about the Ferguson Effect has its own glaring donut hole.

    It is reasonable to say there is a correlation—less traffic stops by the New Jersey State Police led to more car crashes.

    So as I was reading, I was expecting specific data—after all, you are the self-proclaimed expert pattern recognizer—that would demonstrate that blacks! had been primarily responsible for said crashes. Then, I started to realize the narrative was just a rehash of your thesis, and you window dressed it just enough to make it appear the indeed black! motorists were the culprit.



    What specific areas did the slowdowns occur? Were there particular counties more impacted by this slowdown? In those places where the slowdowns occurred, what is the racial breakdown of those traffic stops? Seems to me this is important to NOTICE

    Now, as you stated, in New Jersey there was a 27 percent increase in crashes in 2023 compared to the previous year. But statistics are required on your part to prove, rather than cagily assume, that blacks! were primarily behind the cause of those crashes. What was the breakdown in fatalities—motorists, pedestrians, cyclists? Furthermore, we know several factors play a role into a county’s tally of deadly crashes, like weather and driver behavior, as well as the number of drivers o the road and the number of highway miles. Seems to me this is important to NOTICE.

    
Will you get away with such a glaring donut hole in your analysis? Not if I have a say about it.

    Replies: @Colin Wright

    ‘…Now, as you stated, in New Jersey there was a 27 percent increase in crashes in 2023 compared to the previous year. But statistics are required on your part to prove, rather than cagily assume, that blacks! were primarily behind the cause of those crashes. What was the breakdown in fatalities—motorists, pedestrians, cyclists? Furthermore, we know several factors play a role into a county’s tally of deadly crashes, like weather and driver behavior, as well as the number of drivers o the road and the number of highway miles. Seems to me this is important to NOTICE…’

    So since Steve has failed to prove black behavior is the only possible explanation for the phenomenon, there’s nothing to it? He has to do that before you will recognize that there seems to be a pattern here? More unsupervised boys in the kitchen lead to fewer remaining cookies? Could be other explanations…

    Comically, such reasoning is akin to Holocaust Denial. Since those of us who are quite sure the Holocaust happened can’t prove with philosophical certainty that it did, presto! It didn’t.

    •�Replies: @Corvinus
    @Colin Wright

    "So since Steve has failed to prove black behavior is the only possible explanation for the phenomenon, there’s nothing to it?"

    Thanks for the strawman. I clearly stated it is reasonable to draw the conclusion that less policing on roads has led to an increase in car crashes. The problem is that Mr. Sailer neglected to show that the pattern is the direct result of blacks! behaving badly through statistics. I thought that it is his specialty.
  474. @Colin Wright
    @Corvinus


    '...Now, as you stated, in New Jersey there was a 27 percent increase in crashes in 2023 compared to the previous year. But statistics are required on your part to prove, rather than cagily assume, that blacks! were primarily behind the cause of those crashes. What was the breakdown in fatalities—motorists, pedestrians, cyclists? Furthermore, we know several factors play a role into a county’s tally of deadly crashes, like weather and driver behavior, as well as the number of drivers o the road and the number of highway miles. Seems to me this is important to NOTICE...'
    So since Steve has failed to prove black behavior is the only possible explanation for the phenomenon, there's nothing to it? He has to do that before you will recognize that there seems to be a pattern here? More unsupervised boys in the kitchen lead to fewer remaining cookies? Could be other explanations...

    Comically, such reasoning is akin to Holocaust Denial. Since those of us who are quite sure the Holocaust happened can't prove with philosophical certainty that it did, presto! It didn't.

    Replies: @Corvinus

    “So since Steve has failed to prove black behavior is the only possible explanation for the phenomenon, there’s nothing to it?”

    Thanks for the strawman. I clearly stated it is reasonable to draw the conclusion that less policing on roads has led to an increase in car crashes. The problem is that Mr. Sailer neglected to show that the pattern is the direct result of blacks! behaving badly through statistics. I thought that it is his specialty.

  475. @Jack D
    @Jenner Ickham Errican

    Yes, it is not even a primitive deep fake. A proto deep fake would be something like the famous photo of Stalin with Yezhov edited out of the picture:

    https://assets.editorial.aetnd.com/uploads/2018/04/nikolai-yezhov-pictured-right-of.jpg

    But this was not any sort of "deep fake" at all, just a counterfeit use of a logo which is not the same category.

    Replies: @Jenner Ickham Errican, @David In TN

    I’ve always gotten a kick out of the Stalin-Yezhov photos.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Steve Sailer Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The JFK Assassination and the 9/11 Attacks?