Puente Temburong, Brunei - Diseño de Dos Puentes Atirantados
Puente Temburong, Brunei - Diseño de Dos Puentes Atirantados
Puente Temburong, Brunei - Diseño de Dos Puentes Atirantados
201500013
Alberto Carlucci, Martin Hooton, Hj Mazlan Abd Salim, Sammy Yip, Kelvin Moneypenny, Steve Kite BERICHT
Keywords Cable stayed bridge; concrete ladder beam deck; sea crossing; Keywords Schrägkabelbrücke; Betonüberbau; Meeresüberquerung
Eurocodes
220 © Ernst & Sohn Verlag für Architektur und technische Wissenschaften GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin. Bautechnik 92 (2015), Heft 3
A. Carlucci, M. Hooton, H. M. A. Salim, S. Yip, K. Moneypenny, S. Kite: Temburong Brücke, Brunei – Entwurf von zwei Schrägkabelbrücken
BERICHT REPORT
The all concrete ladder beam deck is 37.2 m wide and
formed from longitudinal edge girders with transverse
cross beams at 4.15 m spacing. The stay cables are an-
chored into the edge girders. The edge girders and the
transverse cross beams are post-tensioned. The general
arrangement is illustrated in Fig. 2.
Fig. 4 Structural analysis models for BCB (left) and ECB (right)
Computerberechnungsmodelle für BCB (links) und ECB (rechts)
Common structural features of the two bridges have led spacing of the crossbeams along the axis of the bridges
to an efficient design process. In fact, given the geometri- was chosen so that the same cross section and a similar
cal and conceptual similarities between the two bridges, a tendon arrangement (i.e. tendon number profile and
parametrical analysis of them resulted effective and led to types) can be adopted for both bridges. This explains why
an optimized design of both structures. A common data- the bridge with the wider deck (Brunei Channel Bridge)
base to both bridges was created through which, by only has the smaller spacing of crossbeams and vice-versa.
varying the few distinguishing geometrical variables of With this configuration the weight of one cast segment,
the two bridges, it was possible to generate the structural comprising two crossbeams is similar for the two struc-
modelling of them from a unique source. The common tures, and consequently similar erection equipment can
model generation was also tied with similar verification be used for both bridges.
tools adopted for both structures and this process helped
to improve the efficiency of the design process and re- Also the edge girders are longitudinally post tensioned
duce the total time spent on the design of both bridges. with the majority of tendons concentrated in the mid-
span regions where the maximum sagging moment oc-
curs. The same number and size of tendons (12 × 31
5 Deck Design strand tendons) are defined for both the mid-span region
of the Eastern Channel Bridge and for the Brunei Chan-
Both Eastern Channel Bridge and Brunei Channel Bridge nel Bridge spans. The tendons are curtailed to follow the
have a ladder beam deck that is cast in-situ in sequential shape of the bending moment envelope, but they are not
deck segments. The option selection process showed how present in the regions close to the tower where the axial
this deck choice at this span range is capable of satisfying force induced by the stay cables is sufficient to provide
the aesthetic requirement of a slender deck line with eco- the resistance of the girder.
nomical use of materials.
In parallel to having similar tendon arrangements, the
Crossbeams span between the edge girders at regular size of the edge girder is the same for both bridges, 2m
spacing and they are shaped with a T-section having the wide by 2.6m deep. The stays are anchored at the edge
sides slightly inclined to facilitate the removal and reuse girders in proximity to the connection with the cross-
of the formwork system during their casting. They are beams and the anchorage blocks of the stays lie within
post tensioned along their axis by typically two tendons the width of the edge girders in a clear attempt to make
per beam which are anchored at the deck edges. The the detail compact and functional.
BERICHT REPORT
Fig. 5 Brunei Channel Bridge Deck Cross Section
Brunei Channel Brücke Überbauquerschnitt
composite action with the crossbeams in one direction tion level to the deck diaphragm, and then again up to the
and with the edge girders in the other. first stay saddle. Then the legs become solid so as to guar-
antee adequate material to resist the increasing localized
At their ends, the bridges have solid diaphragms sitting compression stresses at the stay cable locations. The re-
over the bearings and thus also acting as counterweight cessed upper tower infill provides the necessary stability
by eliminating undesirable bearing uplift. to the system being made up of two separate walls. The
cavity between them, in addition to making the structure
In both bridges the deck is integral at the towers through lighter and minimizing material use, provides also an in-
a torsionally resistant hollow box crossbeam which be- spection route from the hollow legs at deck level to the
comes a solid diaphragm at the tower joint. top of the tower where operational equipment is mount-
ed.
6 Tower Design
7 Stay cables and saddles
The tower is the unique element of this pair of cable
stayed bridges. It is inspired by Islamic architecture with The number of stay cables is an optimisation between the
the objective to be instantly recognizable. quantities of the stay cables and the quantities of pre-
stressing required within the deck. As a result of an opti-
The side legs have a curved tapering shape in the front misation study, twelve stay cables per fan were optimal
view from the deck, while they are linearly reducing in for ECB and 16 for BCB. The stay cables are placed in a
section when viewed from the side elevation. The side modified fan arrangement. At deck level, the spacing be-
faces of the tower, perpendicular to the bridge axis, are tween the first stay and the tower was maximised to ex-
slightly curved in a way to reduce the perception of its ploit the structural capacity of the deck girder, and to in-
mass and at the same time to be consistent with the curvi- crease the angle between the first stay and the tower,
linear architectural language. The tower legs are connect- which improved the aesthetics of that connection. Stay
ed above the deck with a recessed infill wall which termi- cables are anchored at alternate crossbeams so that there
nates with an Islamic arch. The arch is framed with a is one stay per edge girder in each segment.
ribbed feature that originates from the pile cap kicker
level and then tapers out reaching the maximum width at A multi-strand system is specified for the stay cables,
the crown of the arch. This element is strong with symbol- where each 15.7 mm diameter seven-wire strand is indi-
ism as each of the four ribs represents one of the four dis- vidually protected against corrosion by being encapsulat-
tricts of Brunei. Above the arch there is a long window ed in a tightly extruded HDPE cover along its length. This
slot in the infill wall, which allows sunlight to filter system has the significant benefit of allowing installation
through the tower and lighten the appearance of the front and tensioning of each strand, as well as individual strand
elevation. The four ribs and the slot above them signify removal and replacement. Both bridges have been de-
the unification of four districts into one by the project signed to allow replacement of an entire stay, as well as
bridge link. The symbols of the moon and the star mount- the accidental loss of a single stay cable.
ed on top of the tower are the crowning features.
During the design process, the determination of the stay
The apparent complex geometry of the tower was re- load factors in accordance with the Eurocode was not
solved structurally with relatively simple solutions and straightforward. In fact, depending on the stiffness of the
well established means of construction. The side legs are structure, references should be made to BS EN 1992-2 in
the primary structural elements of the tower, supporting the case of a stiff deck, and to BS EN 1993-1-11 [4] for a
the stay cables. They are characterised by a hollow sec- flexible deck, but there is no clear guidance in the code as
tion with constant wall thickness all round from founda- to determine to which category a structure belongs. A
BERICHT REPORT
Fig. 9 Tower Cross Sections: section along mid plane (left), side legs hollow section (centre), side legs solid section (right)
Pylonquerschnitte: Querschnitt in Pylonachse (links), Hohlquerschnitt (mitte), Vollquerschnitt (rechts)
comparative study of built structures that were clearly State in order to prevent a sudden slippage of the saddle
flexible was carried out. The conclusion was that a struc- in service.
ture can be considered flexible when the application of
the stay force to the final stage model was within the al-
lowable tolerance and resulted in a deflection more than 8 Construction
or equal to the allowable vertical deck tolerance, i.e. it
can be easily measured. Both Brunei bridges satisfied this For concrete deck cable stayed bridges, particularly those
rule and therefore the principles of EN1993-1-11 could be that adopt saddles in the tower, the construction sequenc-
applied. In accordance to section 5 of that code, (G+P) ing of the deck is critical to achieve an economical design
was taken as equal to Self Weight + Super-imposed Dead and stability during construction. The following construc-
Load + Creep + Shrinkage + Stay prestress, all measured tion sequence has been assumed in the design as no con-
and confirmed at the time of hand over by reference to tractor has been appointed at the time of writing.
the actual stay loads and the actual achieved deflections.
The (G+P) case was then factored at ULS with factors
1.35/0.95 (or better still with the weighted factors which 8.1 Tower construction
consider the different SDL factors in the UK NA) with
the residual creep and shrinkage from handover to time The tower construction sequence is conventional, but
infinite factored at ULS with factors 1.2/0.0. with additional complexities due to the shape of the tow-
ers. The tower legs can be cast in constant height lifts of
Saddles were chosen at the tower so as to avoid the approximately 4m with a jump-formwork system capable
need for an inspection access route throughout the full of adapting to the tapering cross section. The ribs on the
height of each tower leg, which would have been neces- inside of the legs form a constant sized feature within the
sary for an anchorage system. This resulted in more leg formwork to a point above deck level where the ribs
compact and aesthetical appealing towers. Modern cable start to grow in size. At this point the arch ribs are cast
saddles address the corrosion protection requirements of separately and the leg casting continues up the tower.
the stay cable system and do not limit the multi-strand ad- Due to the inward inclination of the tower legs, the two
vantage of individual strand replacement. Asymmetrical legs are connected with temporary horizontal struts at
frictional loads transferred to the tower are taken up regular intervals. These struts can also be used to assist
through the strand and the allowable magnitude of this the casting of the infill concrete wall that spans between
force was checked against the rather conservative the tower legs. Once the infill wall is cast between the
COULOMB friction formula reported in the section 6 of BS tower legs the final task is to cast the growing rib feature
EN 1993-1-11. above deck level.
F
8.2 Deck construction
max Ed1 e M,fr (1)
FEd 2
A cast in-situ deck cycle was developed to avoid additional
Where FEd1 and FEd2 are the design values of the force re- materials to those required for the in-service condition of
spectively on either side of the saddle, μ is the coefficient the bridge. For both cable stayed bridges, the first portion
of friction between cable and saddle, α is the angle in ra- of the deck from the tower to the first stay is cast on false-
dians, of the cable passing over the saddle and γ is the work supported by the wide tower pile cap. For the further
partial factor for friction. segment casting a balanced cantilever erection cycle is pro-
posed. The sequence is that traveller forms are launched
Following the normal saddle design approach, a similar forward, simultaneously or sequentially, into position to
check was also introduced at the Serviceability Limit cast the new segments, then all segment reinforcement is
fixed and the cable stay anchors, stressing anchors and 9 Conclusions
ducts are installed. The stay cable is then installed and sub-
ject to a first stage of prestressing against the formwork. When built, the Brunei Bridges will be landmark and
Portion 1 (Figure 10) of the east and west segments are iconic structures for Brunei.
cast, and afterwards Portion 2, and in both cases simulta-
neously or sequentially. Finally the second stage of stress- The towers are the most recognizable elements and,
ing of the stay cable from both ends is performed after hav- whilst having an apparent complex geometry, they have
ing been released from the formwork system. been designed with conventional and well established
structural solutions and means of construction. The
This sequence will allow the contractor flexibility to cast bridges show evident similarities, both in the towers and
the two ends of the cantilevers independently and se- in the ladder beam decks, and this led to an improved de-
quentially on the condition that the cantilevers are not sign efficiency by adopting a parametric procedure of
out of balance by more than 50 % of the deck segment analysis while common detailing is expected to bring ben-
weight acting with the same lever arm. 100 % deck seg- efits during the construction.
ment out of balance was not possible as it resulted in an
uneconomical deck and tower, with greater likelihood of These bridges have been one of the first applications of
saddle slip during construction. The adoption of tempo- Eurocode to the design of a fully concrete cable stayed
rary buffeting cables between the deck and the tower pile bridge.
cap are assumed in the design for the following benefits:
Bibliography
[1] KITE S., YEE K.O., HUSSAIN N., CHIN K. K., YIP S., TO M.: Autoren:
Temburong Bridge, Brunei – A new 30 km road link. Alberto Carlucci, Senior Engineer;
IABSE Symposium Madrid 2014: Engineering for Progress, Martin Hooton, Associate;
Nature and People, September 2014 Kelvin Moneypenny, Senior Engineer;
Arup, 13 Fitzroy Street London W1T 4BQ United Kingdom
[2] BS EN 1991-2, Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 2:
[email protected], [email protected],
Traffic loads on bridges, 2003
[email protected]
[3] BS EN 1992-2, Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures –
Part 2: Concrete bridges – Design and detailing rules, 2005 Sammy Yip, Associate;
[4] BS EN 1993-1-11, Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures – Steve Kite, Associate Director;
Part 1-11: Design of structures with tension components, Arup, Level 5 Festival Walk 80 Tat Chee Avenue Hong Kong
2006 [email protected] , [email protected]