You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. Dismiss alert
Chunked Transferã¨ã¯ ä¸è¬ã«HTTP KeepAliveãå©ç¨ããã«ã¯ãã¬ã¹ãã³ã¹ã®ããã£ãã©ãã§çµããã次ã®ã¬ã¹ãã³ã¹ãã©ãããå§ã¾ãããã¯ã©ã¤ã¢ã³ããç¥ãå¿ è¦ãããã¾ãããã®ããHTTP/1.0ã§ã¯KeepAliveãè¡ãçºã«ããã£ã®é·ããContent-Lengthããããã«å ¥ããªããã°ãªãã¾ããã§ãããããµã¤ãºã測ãããã«ãã¼ã¿ããã¹ã¦ã¡ã¢ãªã«èªã¿è¾¼ããªã©ã®å¦çãå¿ è¦ã«ãªããã¬ã¹ãã³ã¹éå§ã¾ã§ã®æéããããã¾ããï¼ä¸è¬çãªã¢ããªã±ã¼ã·ã§ã³ã«ã¯ãã¾ãå½±é¿ãããã¾ãããï¼ ããã§HTTP/1.1ã§ã¯Chunked Transferã¨ããä»çµã¿ãå ¥ã£ã¦ãã¦ãäºåã«å ¨ä½ã®ã¬ã¹ãã³ã¹ã®é·ããåãããªãã¦ããchunk=åºã¾ãæ¯ã«ãµã¤ãºãè¨ãã¦ã¬ã¹ãã³ã¹ãè¿ãã¦ãããæå¾ã«0byteã¨éä¿¡ãããã¨ã§ãã³ã³ãã³ãã®åãç®ããããããã«ãªã£ã¦ãã¾ãã HTTP/1.1 200 OK
weighttp¶ About¶ weighttp (pronounced weighty) is a lightweight and small benchmarking tool for webservers. It was designed to be very fast and easy to use and only supports a tiny fraction of the HTTP protocol in order to be lean and simple. weighttp supports multithreading to make good use of modern CPUs with multiple cores as well as asynchronous i/o for concurrent requests within a single thre
We compare the performance of SPDY and HTTP in a variety of setting using a controlled tested study. We rely in publically available software and run with mostly default configurations. It is not our aim to extract every last bit of performance out of either SPDY or HTTP. Rather, we are interested in understanding how various mechanisms used by the two protocols affect page load times. This report
AbstractThis document describes the thinking behind zsync, a new file transfer program which implements efficient download of only the content of a file which is not already known to the receiver. zsync uses the rsync algorithm, but implemented on the client side, so that only one-off pre-calculations are required on the server, and no special server software or new protocol is required to use zsy
Spec ã¯ãã¾ããã¼ãã¼ã«è¿½ãããã¦ãå¾ã§çãç®ã«ãã£ããããããã§ãããä¹ ãã¶ãã«é¢ç½ããªã¼ã¨æã£ãã®ã§ã¡ãã£ã¨åãä¸ãã¦ã¿ã¾ãã ã¡ãªã¿ã«æãèªã¿ãªã®ã§è¨äºã®æ£ç¢ºæ§ã«ã¤ãã¦ã¯ãã¾ãä¿è¨¼ãã¾ããw PATCH Method for HTTP RFC 5789 ã«ãã PATCH Method for HTTP ã§ãããRESTful API ã®è´å½çãªå¼±ç¹ã§ããã PUT ããªã½ã¼ã¹ã®å®å ¨ãªãç½®ãæããªã®ã«å¯¾ãã¦ãPATCH ã¯å·®åé©ç¨ã§ããæãä¸ã é¢ç½ãã§ãã 2.1. A Simple PATCH Example ã®ãµã³ãã«ãè¦ã¦ã¿ã¾ãã PATCH /file.txt HTTP/1.1 Host: www.example.com Content-Type: application/example If-Match: "e0023aa4e" Content-Length: 100
éä¿¡ç¸æã®ãµã¼ãã HTTP/1.1 対å¿ã¨ç¢ºèªã§ããã¾ã§ã¯ 1.0 ã¨äºææ§ã®ãªã chunked encoding ã¯ä½¿ããªãã ã§ã確èªãåããæ¥ç¶ã使ãåã = HTTP/1.1 ã®æç¶çæ¥ç¶ã使ãåã㦠POST / PUT ããã£ã¦ãã¨ã ãã©ãæç¶çæ¥ç¶ã®ã¿ã¤ã ã¢ã¦ãæ¡ä»¶ã¯ãTCP æ¥ç¶ç¢ºç«å¾ååã®ãªã¯ã¨ã¹ãããå³ããã å¾ã£ã¦ãPOST / PUT ã¯ãã¹ãçæ§ããªããªã¯ã¨ã¹ãã ããæç¶çæ¥ç¶ã«ã¯æããã®ã¯é¿ããæ¹ãç¡é£ã ã ã¨ãããã¨ã§ãåºæ¬ä½¿ãã¹ããããªããã¨ãã話ããã (http://github.com/tokuhirom/p5-Furl/commit/67c3ea52a23542a44e58869d0bcebcb53becd34a)ã
Exception handling There are two main type of exceptions that the user of HttpClient may encounter when executing HTTP methods: transport exceptions protocol exceptions Not all of these exceptions will be propagated to the user in regular HttpClient use. Exceptions handled internally by HttpClient are marked below as INTERNAL. Transport exceptions Protocol exceptions HTTP transport safety Automati
httpstate A. Barth Internet-Draft Google, Inc. Intended status: Standards Track August 22, 2010 Expires: February 23, 2011 Simple HTTP State Management Mechanism draft-abarth-cake-00 Abstract This document describes a simple HTTP state management mechanism, called cake, that lets HTTP servers maintain stateful sessions with HTTP user agents. This mechanism is harmonized with the same-origin securi
[This post is by Gilles Debunne, an engineer in the Android group who loves to get multitasked. â Tim Bray] A good practice in creating responsive applications is to make sure your main UI thread does the minimum amount of work. Any potentially long task that may hang your application should be handled in a different thread. Typical examples of such tasks are network operations, which involve unpr
Blog Search when-present<#else>when-missing. (These only cover the last step of the expression; to cover the whole expression, use parenthesis: (myOptionalVar.foo)!myDefault, (myOptionalVar.foo)?? ---- ---- FTL stack trace ("~" means nesting-related): - Failed at: ${entry.path} [in template "__entry.ftlh" at line 3, column 25] - Reached through: #include "__entry.ftlh" [in template "entry.ftlh" at
twitter stream APIã¨ã¯ãtwitterã®ã¹ãã¼ã¿ã¹æ´æ°ã«å¯¾ãã¦ãã¼ã¯ã¼ãã§trackããããããã°ã«ã¼ãå ã«å±ããã¹ãã¼ã¿ã¹æ´æ°ããã£ã«ã¿ãããåºæ¥ãAPIãªã®ã ãã©ãå®éã«ã¯chunkedãªã¹ããªã¼ã ãæµãã¦æ¥ã¦ããã®ã§ãã£ã¦ãããã使ã£ãWebã¢ããªãä½ãéã«ã¯long pollã使ãã®ãè¯ãããã ãã¯ã©ã¤ã¢ã³ããµã¤ãã§javascriptãå¦çããéã« ãµã¼ããµã¤ãã§ã¹ãã¼ã¿ã¹æ´æ°ãFIFOã«æºãè¾¼ã ã¯ã©ã¤ã¢ã³ããããªã¯ã¨ã¹ãããããã¯(long poll)ãFIFOããã¹ãã¼ã¿ã¹ãéåºãã ã¯ã©ã¤ã¢ã³ããµã¤ãã§long pollãè¡ãç»é¢ãæ´æ°ãã å度ãµã¼ãã¸ãªã¯ã¨ã¹ããæãã ãç¹°ãè¿ãã®ã§ããã°ããã£ããã¹ããªã¼ã ãªã®ã«ã¢ããªãµã¼ãã¨ã®æ¥ç¶ãåã£ã¦ãã¾ãäºã«ãªããåºæ¥ãã°ã¯ã©ã¤ã¢ã³ãããWebã¢ããªãã¹ããªã¼ãã³ã°ã¨ããããããããªãããµã¼ãããã®ã¹ãã¼ã¿
Indeed, adding RAW_PATH_INFO could be a good idea, I also think that changing the PATH_INFO meaning could be worse than living with that bug. "So adding RAW_PATH_INFO, or REQUEST_URI which is currently not in the spec, to be undecoded might make more sense." Probably a bad idea to duplicate that kind of information in the environment. I don't understand what's the big deal about specifying PATH_IN
Hi, Iâm Mark Nottingham. I write about the Web, protocol design, HTTP, Internet governance, and more. This is a personal blog, it does not represent anyone else. Find out more. Comments? Let's talk on Mastodon. @mnot@techpolicy.social other HTTP Caching posts The State of Browser Caching, Revisited Thursday, 16 March 2017 RFC5861: HTTP Stale Controls Thursday, 6 May 2010 Expires vs. max-age Tuesda
ã絶対ã«å½¹ã«ç«ã¡ã¾ãï¼ããéãä»äºããªãæã«åããããã¼ã³ä¼ç¤¾ã£ã¦èãã ãã§æ¬å½ã«é ¼ãããã¨æãã¾ãããï¼ãããªæã«åã«ãªã£ã¦ããããã¼ã³ä¼ç¤¾ã£ã¦ç¥ã§ãããï¼ãããªé ¼ãããã¼ã³ä¼ç¤¾ãå³é¸ç´¹ä»ãã¦ãããµã¤ãã¯ãã¡ãã«ãªããã§ãï¼å¤§ãã³ãã®æã«æ¯éãã¯ãªãã¯ãã¦ãã ãããç´ æ´ãããæ å ±ãç®ç½æ¼ãã§ãï¼
ã¯ã¦ãªããã¯ãã¼ã¯ - Fasterfoxãæå¼·ããã件 - çæ§å¼ãç¯ãã ãçãä¸ãã£ã¦ãã®ã§ï¼æºä¸ã®è©±ã ãã§ããï¼ãã¾ããæ¸ãã¦ã¿ã¾ãã RFC (2616) ã§ã®è¨è¿° Clients that use persistent connections SHOULD limit the number of simultaneous connections that they maintain to a given server. A single-user client SHOULD NOT maintain more than 2 connections with any server or proxy. A proxy SHOULD use up to 2*N connections to another server or proxy, where N is the number
ãªãªã¼ã¹ãé害æ å ±ãªã©ã®ãµã¼ãã¹ã®ãç¥ãã
ææ°ã®äººæ°ã¨ã³ããªã¼ã®é ä¿¡
å¦çãå®è¡ä¸ã§ã
j次ã®ããã¯ãã¼ã¯
kåã®ããã¯ãã¼ã¯
lãã¨ã§èªã
eã³ã¡ã³ãä¸è¦§ãéã
oãã¼ã¸ãéã
{{#tags}}- {{label}}
{{/tags}}