RSS
“The Jew truly solicits anti-Semitism with his readiness to scent out anti-Semitism everywhere.â€
Carl Jung, 1934
For a long time I’ve been fascinated by the way in which Jews obsess over deceased, historical figures who made unflattering comments about their race. The more famous and talented, the greater the intensity of the obsession. Such preoccupations have featured previously at The Occidental Observer, for example in the Jewish vendetta against T.S. Eliot, and against his contemporary Ezra Pound. In Anthony Julius’s T.S. Eliot, anti-Semitism and Literary Form, for example, Julius writes that Jews reading Eliot’s poetry are both “appalled and impressed.â€[1]A. Julius, T.S. Eliot, anti-Semitism and Literary Form (Thames & Hudson, 2003), 40. They are appalled because they perceive an unjustified critique upon their ethnic group, and they perceive this critique more acutely because of their ethnocentrism. They are impressed, on the other hand, because they appreciate, and are threatened by, the talent of their target, often despite themselves. The ‘attraction’ which brings them back repeatedly to their target arises from the desire to deconstruct and demean that talent, and therefore avenge or mitigate the critique.
Jews are also firmly in the grip of a historically rooted fear or paranoia. The past is ever present for Jews, prompting them into risky and extremely aggressive actions against host populations. The perfect expression of this paranoia can be found in a very recent article in The Guardian by Jewish journalist Barney Ronay. Ronay is currently in Germany to cover the European Football championships, but he can’t seem to focus on sport. He informs his readers that he has “loved being in this warm, friendly place for Euro 2024, a homecoming of sorts. But that doesn’t stop it terrifying me.†He continues:
Here, by way of example, is a non-exhaustive list of German things that have felt terrifying to me, begun on my first day at the Euros when a happy German woman was laughing uncontrollably on a train passing through woodland outside Munich and I realised that happy uncontrollable German laughter is terrifying. German trains are terrifying. German railway sidings are terrifying. There are transport vibes here, fleeing energy. A German forest is terrifying, in particular a German forest clearing. An empty German park at dusk is terrifying. Any German village square is terrifying … What else? German dark wood furniture. A row of parked German bicycles (Where are they going? Will I need one?). German staircases, corridors, suitcases. Most German shoes. All discarded German shoes.
Many of these fears have their origins in tales passed down to Jewish children, and reinforced through Jewish cultural and political groups. Fear is a key ingredient in the cement that binds Jewish ethnocentrism, which is why the ADL invests a lot of money in surveys of anti-Semitism intended to terrify and shepherd the ethnic flock into cohesive action. In Ronay’s case, “Family myth dictates one of my distant uncles was pulled off a train and shot. The bullet passed through his neck, he lay down for a bit, got up and rejoined the resistance.†I applaud his use of the word myth here, but there are many hundreds of thousands of Jewish families which cherish such fantastical boogeyman tales as historical fact. And Jewish fear, and Jewish ethnocentrism, needs its boogeymen, be they obvious ones like Hitler, or more persistent cultural figures such as Eliot or Pound—figures who can still be discussed publicly with a level of respect and admiration. Among such figures we find Carl Jung.
Carl Jung and the Culture of Critique
Although, or perhaps because, Jung was once associated with psychoanalysis, a movement so Jewish that it comprises one of the Jewish intellectual movements highlighted in Kevin MacDonald’s Culture of Critique, the Swiss psychiatrist has increasingly become the focus of condemnation, deconstruction, and criticism in recent years. In the recently-published Anti-Semitism and Analytical Psychology: Jung, Politics and Culture, Jewish academic Daniel Burston writes that:
In today’s world of psychotherapy, one cannot be a Jungian without having to answer the charge that Jung was both a Nazi and anti-Semitic. … His statements on the over-materialistic values of Jewish psychology, and its corrosive effects on the spiritual nature of the psyche, were made in the 1930s. … Psychoanalysts have used it as a reason not to study Jung; other intellectuals use it as a reason to discredit Jung.[2]D. Burston, Anti-Semitism and Analytical Psychology: Jung, Politics and Culture (Routledge: New York, 2021).
In a paragraph that reads a little like something from a horror novel, Jung’s place as a boogeyman is introduced early, with anti-Semitism explained as a mysterious, ghostly and terrifying phenomenon:
After reading this book, perhaps Jungians will grasp why so many Jews think of anti-Semitism as a shape-shifting but deathless adversary that lives forever in the hidden recesses of Christian and Muslim cultures; one that lies dormant for shorter or longer periods, but always returns to torment us through the ages.
Shape-shifting and deathless. Oh my.
Burston draws a distinction between what he calls “low-brow, high-intensity†anti-Semites, and “high-brow, low-intensity†anti-Semites. He explicitly mentions Kevin MacDonald as an example of the latter, and places Jung in this category also. Burston claims that “anti-Semitic intellectuals†like MacDonald and Jung, while non-violent, “will also offer cover or support for less educated, more overt kind of anti-Semites when circumstances require.†The smear is therefore that men like MacDonald and Jung are essentially thugs in suits.
Burston traces Jung’s thought to the neo-conservative movement dominant during his university years, with Jung painted as having imbibed a semi-barbaric quasi-Germanism. “It rejected naturalism and was drawn to symbolism and irrationalism. In politics it questioned democracy and rejected socialism, preferring a Nietzschean elitism. . . . Jung adopted [Eduard von Hartmann’s] critique of modernity [including his] concern about the ‘Judaization’ of modern society. . . . For Jung, Freud became the representative of such a rationalistic, ‘disenchanted’ view of the world.â€[3]G. Cocks (2023). [Review of the book Anti-Semitism and Analytical Psychology: Jung, Politics and Culture, by Daniel Burston]. Antisemitism Studies 7(1), 215-222.
By the 1920s and 1930s, supporters of Freud and of Jung increasingly saw each other as opponents in a battle for civilization as each defined it. Because of his anti-materialism and his criticism of many of Freud’s more perverse theories, Freudians, most of whom were Jewish, regarded Jung as an anti-Semite and latterly as “a herald of fascist and Nazi barbarism.†Burston continues in this vein, arguing for a “significant and disturbing link between the dynamics of antisemitism over the centuries and the psychology and politics of Carl Jung.â€
A crucial problem that Jews, past and present, have with Jung is that he dared to turn the analytical gaze back on the Jews themselves. While the entirety of psychoanalysis seemed geared towards what Kevin MacDonald termed “a radical criticism of gentile society,†as well as the development of self-serving theories of anti-Semitism, Jung developed a cutting critique of Jews and of what he called “Jewish anti-Christianism,†with many of his observations arising from direct experience with the Jewish psychoanalytic milieu. In other words, Jung put Jewish quacks “on the couch.†In a letter to an associate dated May 1934, Jung explained:
The Jewish Christ-complex makes for a somewhat hystericized general attitude … which has become especially clear to me in the course of the present anti-Christian attacks upon myself. The mere fact that I speak of a difference between Jewish and Christian psychology suffices to allow anyone to voice the prejudice that I am an anti-Semite. … As you know, Freud previously accused me of anti-Semitism because I could not countenance his soulless materialism. The Jew truly solicits anti-Semitism with his readiness to scent out anti-Semitism everywhere. I cannot see why the Jew, like any so-called Christian, is incapable of assuming that he is being personally criticised when one has an opinion of him. Why must it always be assumed that one wants to condemn the Jewish people?
For this affront, Jung is both dangerous and unforgivable in Jewish eyes. Burston is far from unique in wanting to diminish Jung because of his views on Jews. In the late 1990s a similar effort was made by the British Jewish academic Andrew Samuels, who claimed that “in C.G. Jung, nationalism found its psychologist.†The fearful response of Samuels to Jung was to claim that it was Jung who was gripped by a fear of Jews. Samuels tried to put Jung “on the couch†and to psychologize his attitudes to Jews by explaining them as being rooted in feelings of being threatened:
My perception is that the ideas of nation and of national difference form a fulcrum between the Hitlerian phenomenon and Jung’s analytical psychology. For, as a psychologist of nations, Jung too would feel threatened by the Jews, this strange so-called nation without a land. Jung, too, would feel threatened by the Jews, this strange nation without cultural forms — that is, without national cultural forms — of its own, and hence, in Jung’s words of 1933, requiring a “host nationâ€. What threatens Jung, in particular, can be illuminated by enquiring closely into what he meant when he writes, as he often does, of “Jewish psychology.â€
Even in the early 2000s, there seemed to be a divide between non-Jewish scholars keen to keep Jung in the public eye, and Jewish scholars keen to keep him in the gutter. In a letter to the New York Times in 2004, one “Henry Friedman†took issue with Robert Boynton (NYU) and Deirdre Bair (National Book Award winning biographer) for their apparent agreement that Jung was “neither personally anti-Semitic nor politically astute,†thus absolving Jung of some of the worst accusations levelled against him by Jewish critics keen to associate Jung with the ideas of National Socialism. Friedman called this “a further contribution to a misleading attempt to minimize the importance of Jung’s anti-Semitic racism and his contributions to the Third Reich’s genocidal policies.†Friedman continues:
It is pathetic that Jung should be excused from responsibility for his virulent racism and his importance in the Nazi movement. Most important, it is likely that his ideas about psychoanalysis were instrumental in Hitler and Göring’s desire to cleanse psychoanalysis of Freud’s ideas — especially the notion of the Oedipus complex, which apparently offended Hitler’s sensibilities. To conclude that Martin Heidegger was more of a collaborator than Jung serves to divert attention from the serious nature of Jung’s involvement with the Nazis’ anti-Semitic propaganda. Whether he was a worse offender than Heidegger is hard to assess, but as one who wrote papers on the inferiority of the Jewish race, Jung deserves a special degree of condemnation, not the lame excuse granted him by both Bair and Boynton.
Jung’s Attitudes Towards Jews
Jung’s professional and private writings contain a significant amount of material about Jews, and the content is most often highly critical. It is therefore not surprising that Jews should see Jung as a formidable opponent. Jung made many statements which appear to concur with Kevin MacDonald’s assessment that psychoanalysis under Freud was a Jewish intellectual movement. In 1934 Jung received much criticism for an article he published titled The State of Psychotherapy Today, in which he wrote that psychoanalysis was “a Jewish psychology.†Defending himself against accusations of racism for suggesting that Jews and Europeans have a different psychology, Jung explained:
Psychological differences obtain between all nations and races, and even between the inhabitants of Zurich, Basel, and Bern. (Where else would all the good jokes come from?) There are in fact differences between families and between individuals. That is why I attack every levelling psychology when it raises a claim to universal validity, as for instance the Freudian and the Adlerian. … All branches of mankind unite in one stem—yes, but what is a stem without separate branches? Why this ridiculous touchiness when anybody dares to say anything about the psychological difference between Jews and Christians? Every child knows that differences exist.
Jung believed that Jews, like all peoples, have a characteristic personality, and he stressed the need to take this personality into account. In his own sphere of expertise, Jung warned that “Freud and Adler’s psychologies were specifically Jewish, and therefore not legitimate for Aryans.â€[4]B. Cohen, “Jung’s Answer to Jews,†Jung Journal: Culture and Psyche, 6:1 (56–71), 59. For Jung, a formative factor in the Jewish personality was the rootlessness of the Jews and the persistence of the Diaspora. Jung argued that Jews lacked a “chthontic quality,†meaning “the Jew … is badly at a loss for that quality in man which roots him to the earth and draws new strength from below.â€[5]Ibid, 58.
(B. Cohen, “Jung’s Answer to Jews,†Jung Journal: Culture and Psyche, 6:1 (56–71), 59.) Jung penned these words in 1918, but they retain significance even after the founding of the State of Israel, since vastly more Jews live outside Israel than within it. Jews remain a Diaspora people, and many continue to see their Diaspora status as a strength. Because they are scattered and rootless, however, Jung argued that Jews developed methods of getting on in the world that are built on exploiting weakness in others rather than expressing explicit strength. In Jung’s phrasing, “the Jews have this particularity in common with women; being physically weaker, they have to aim at the chinks in the armour of their adversary.â€[6]Ibid.
(B. Cohen, “Jung’s Answer to Jews,†Jung Journal: Culture and Psyche, 6:1 (56–71), 59.)
Jung believed that Jews were incapable of operating effectively without a host society, and that they relied heavily upon grafting themselves into the systems of other peoples in order to succeed. In The State of Psychotherapy Today Jung wrote: “The Jew, who is something of a nomad, has never yet created a cultural form of his own, and as far as we can see, never will, since all his instincts and talents require a more or less civilized nation to act as host for their development.†This process of group development often involved ‘aiming at the chinks in the armour of their adversary,’ along with other flexible strategies.[7]T. Kirsch, “Jung’s Relationship with Jews and Judaism,†in Analysis and Activism: Social and Political Contributions of Jungian Psychology (London: Routledge, ), 174.
Jung also believed (in common with a finding in Kevin MacDonald’s work) that there was a certain psychological aggressiveness in Jews, which was partly a result of the internal mechanics of Judaism. In a remarkably prescient set of observations in the 1950s, Jung expressed distaste for the behavior of Jewish women and essentially predicted the rise of feminism as a symptom of the pathological Jewess. Jung believed that Jewish men were “brides of Yahweh,†rendering Jewish women more or less obsolete within Judaism. In reaction, argued Jung, Jewish women in the early twentieth century began aggressively venting their frustrations against the male-centric nature of Judaism (and against the host society as a whole) while still conforming to the characteristic Jewish psychology and its related strategies. Writing to Martha Bernays, Freud’s wife, he once remarked of Jewish women that “so many of them are loud, aren’t they?†and later added he had treated “very many Jewish women — in all these women there is a loss of individuality, either too much or too little. But the compensation is always for the lack. That is to say, not the right attitude.â€[8]Ibid, 177.
(T. Kirsch, “Jung’s Relationship with Jews and Judaism,†in Analysis and Activism: Social and Political Contributions of Jungian Psychology (London: Routledge, ), 174.)
Jung, meanwhile, was cautious about accusations of anti-Semitism, and he was “critical of the oversensitivity of Jews to anti-Semitism,†believing “one cannot criticise an individual Jew without it immediately becoming an anti-Semitic attack.â€[9]T. Kirsch, “Jung and Judaism,†Jung Journal: Culture and Psyche, 6:1 (6-7), 6. It is certainly difficult to believe that Jung, who basically argued that Jews had a unique psychological profile and had developed a unique method for getting on in the world, would have disagreed with the almost identical foundational premise of MacDonald’s trilogy. In fact, Jung believed that playing the victim and utilizing accusations of anti-Semitism against their critics were simply parts of the Jewish strategy—a useful cover for concerted ethnocentric action in “aiming at the chinks in the armour of their adversary.†For example, after the war, in a 1945 letter to Mary Mellon, he wrote, “It is however difficult to mention the anti-Christianism of the Jews after the horrible things that have happened in Germany. But Jews are not so damned innocent after all—the role played by the intellectual Jews in pre-war Germany would be an interesting object of investigationâ€[10]S. Zemmelman (2017). “Inching towards wholeness: C.G. Jung and his relationship to Judaism.†Journal of Analytical Psychology, 62(2), 247–262. Indeed, MacDonald notes:
a prominent feature of anti-Semitism among the Social Conservatives and racial anti-Semites in Germany from 1870 to 1933 was their belief that Jews were instrumental in developing ideas that subverted traditional German attitudes and beliefs. Jews were vastly overrepresented as editors and writers during the 1920s in Germany, and “a more general cause of increased anti-Semitism was the very strong and unfortunate propensity of dissident Jews to attack national institutions and customs in both socialist and non-socialist publications†(Gordon 1984, 51).[i] This “media violence†directed at German culture by Jewish writers such as Kurt Tucholsky—who “wore his subversive heart on his sleeve†(Pulzer 1979, 97)—was publicized widely by the anti-Semitic press (Johnson 1988, 476–477).
Jews were not simply overrepresented among radical journalists, intellectuals, and “producers of culture†in Weimar Germany, they essentially created these movements. “They violently attacked everything about German society. They despised the military, the judiciary, and the middle class in general†(Rothman & Lichter 1982, 85). Massing (1949, 84) notes the perception of the anti-Semite Adolf Stoecker of Jewish “lack of reverence for the Christian-conservative world.†(The Culture of Critique, Ch. 1)
These sentiments echoed comments made in November 1933 to Esther Harding, in which Jung expressed the opinion that Jews had clustered in Weimar Germany because they tend to “fish in troubled waters,†by which he meant that Jews tend to congregate and flourish where social decay is ongoing. He remarked that he had personally observed German Jews drinking champagne in Montreaux (Switzerland) while “Germany was starving,†and that while “very few had been expelled†and “Jewish shops in Berlin went on the same,†if there was a rising hardship among them in Germany it was because “overall the Jews deserved it.â€[11]See W. Schoenl and L. Schoenl, Jung’s Evolving View of Nazi Germany: From the Nazi Takeover to the End of World War II (Asheville: Chiron, 2016). Perhaps most interesting of all in any discussion of Jewish acquisition of influence, it appears that in 1944 Jung oversaw the implementation of quotas on Jewish admission to the Analytical Psychology Club of Zurich. The quotas (a generous 10% of full members and 25% for guest members) were inserted into a secret appendix to the by-laws of the club and remained in place until 1950.[12]S. Frosh (2005). “Jung and the Nazis: Some Implications for Psychoanalysis.†Psychoanalysis and History, 7(2), (253–271), 258. One can only assume that, like other quotas introduced around the world at various times, the goal here was to limit, or at least retain some measure of control over, Jewish numerical and directional influence within that body.
Jung was of course operating in a time period in which racial self-awareness was acute on all sides. Kevin MacDonald explains in The Culture of Critique that, within psychoanalysis, there was a clear understanding among Jews that Jung was an Aryan and not quite capable of being in full communion with its Jewish members and leaders. MacDonald writes:
Early in their relationship Freud also had suspicions about Jung, the result of “worries about Jung’s inherited Christian and even anti-Jewish biases, indeed his very ability as a non-Jew to fully understand and accept psychoanalysis itself.†Before their rupture, Freud described Jung as a “strong independent personality, as a Teuton.†After Jung was made head of the International Psychoanalytic Association, a colleague of Freud’s was concerned because “taken as a race,†Jung and his gentile colleagues were “completely different from us Viennese.†(The Culture of Critique, Ch.4)
Conclusion
To the extent that psychoanalysis continues to exist as a movement, or at least as a niche within academia and culture, it’s clear that Jung “the Teuton†continues to haunt Jews with his comments and criticisms, and the split that occurred in the lifetime of Jung and Freud persists in some fashion a century later — a testament to the fact, perhaps, that psychoanalysis was a tool for racial conflict from its inception. Were he alive today, I’m sure Jung would be amused but perhaps not surprised that he continues to feature in the psyche of Jews, as terrifying a boogeyman as uncontrollable German laughter.
Notes
[1] A. Julius, T.S. Eliot, anti-Semitism and Literary Form (Thames & Hudson, 2003), 40.
[2] D. Burston, Anti-Semitism and Analytical Psychology: Jung, Politics and Culture (Routledge: New York, 2021).
[3] G. Cocks (2023). [Review of the book Anti-Semitism and Analytical Psychology: Jung, Politics and Culture, by Daniel Burston]. Antisemitism Studies 7(1), 215-222.
[4] B. Cohen, “Jung’s Answer to Jews,†Jung Journal: Culture and Psyche, 6:1 (56–71), 59.
[5] Ibid, 58.
[6] Ibid.
[7] T. Kirsch, “Jung’s Relationship with Jews and Judaism,†in Analysis and Activism: Social and Political Contributions of Jungian Psychology (London: Routledge, ), 174.
[8] Ibid, 177.
[9] T. Kirsch, “Jung and Judaism,†Jung Journal: Culture and Psyche, 6:1 (6-7), 6.
[10] S. Zemmelman (2017). “Inching towards wholeness: C.G. Jung and his relationship to Judaism.†Journal of Analytical Psychology, 62(2), 247–262.
[11] See W. Schoenl and L. Schoenl, Jung’s Evolving View of Nazi Germany: From the Nazi Takeover to the End of World War II (Asheville: Chiron, 2016).
[12] S. Frosh (2005). “Jung and the Nazis: Some Implications for Psychoanalysis.†Psychoanalysis and History, 7(2), (253–271), 258.
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
What about ancient Israel, Moses, and the prophets, and Jesus Christ?
But Jung must take for granted, as do I, that the “Jew” is actually the rootless, golden calf Hebrew parasite. And yes, this jew is terrified of anyone with principles, most particularly Moses — as well he should be. Moses whacked him good. So good, in fact, that he turned into Satan (the neurotic anti-Moses, anti-Christ, antagonist to the world, an almost otherworldly creature) out of stiff-necked spite, defiance, vindictiveness, and orneriness. But Satan has convinced the world the jew is a righteous, pious, upstanding, essential pillar of society. Satan has convinced the jew of this himself. This is why the jew sees himself entitled to his endless treachery and conflict-profiteering.
As Moses, the founder of Judaism did, taking the jew’s head off at the neck for his organized crimes driven by his pathological greed and compulsion for treason might again be what it takes to save human civilization. But you’ve got to go through his zoglodyte stooges first, because Satan keeps his special people well insulated behind layers upon layers of soulless tools, useful idiots, and belly-crawling, organized criminal co-profiteers.
Very good article.
It’s always the same thing, ex Wagner, at a certain point the Aryan although full of good will ends up being disgusted and the association breaks, proving that the differences are irreconcilable.
Of course, the goy’s anti-Semitism is always to blame…( Wink)
The jews have been cursed exactly as was told in Deuteronomy, should they break the Covenant.
“And among these nations you shall find no ease, and there shall be no rest for the sole of your foot; but the LORD will give you a trembling heart, and failing eyes, and a languishing soul; your life shall hang in doubt before you; night and day you shall be in dread, and have no assurance of your life.”
I hear much criticism of the OT for saying jews will rule over all and are chosen. True, if they keep the Covenant. But they were never going to and God knew this. So they got the curse and everyone seems to forget about that side of it.
Was an explanation for this not proffered once?
If I recall, there was a study about European babies and Jewish babies and it appeared to prove that the European babies were curious and accepting of people they didn’t know but the Jewish babies were relentlessly fearful and hostile of strangers.
This could just be like the mild epigenetics we see in more mundane topics. Such as one of your grandparents might have been terrified of snakes. Then your parent will feel uncomfortable when they see a snake but by the third generation, there would be no effect.
The tales told to Jewish children might be to strengthen and reinforce the primal fear. Which in turn keeps the group intact.
Europeans need what amounts to a primal Fear of the Other, just like Jews. Otherwise, our group will perish as others have before us. We need lots more than that but fear of extinction would make us sober enough to take the next steps.
Very interesting article, have often wondered about Jung`s experience of /opinion about the Jewish Question.
Personally also found it interesting to see that while Rudolf Steiner and he were contemporaries and not too fond of each other`s philosophical systems, on the Jewish Question, they were fully aligned it seems.
As Steiner put it in 1897, explaining his term of Jewish “Hypersensitivity” as the core of Jewish Mis-relations with the non-jewish people around them :
“Actual antisemitism is not the cause of this Jewish hypersensitivity, but rather the
false image of the anti-Jewish movement invented by overwrought imaginations.
Anyone who has dealt with Jews knows how deep runs the tendency to create
such an image, even among the best members of their nation. Mistrust toward
non-Jews has completely taken over their souls.”
(Found in: Steiner, ‘Die Sehnsucht der Juden nach Palästina’, Magazin für Literatur 1897 vol. 66 no. 38; reprinted in Steiner,
Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Kultur- und Zeitgeschichte, pp. 196-201, quote at p. 198.)
chosen…. imo, this one word is the root cause, of the majority of problems they have experienced in their long and acrimonious relations, with the rest of the societies, with which they have come into contact. this sense of self declared jewish supremacy, as god’s chosen people, implies that non-jewish people are by definition, not chosen.
they in fact, have a whole nomenclature used to describe non-jews, goy, gentile, shiksa, amalek, etc., they fail to realize the inherent prejudice, in these terms and concepts, oblivious to how this would be received by their host community. i have often felt that this was either a form of high functioning autistic cluelessness, or worse, a wanton display of jewish supremacism, couched in a thinly disguised pig latin. well pig latin is not that hard to figure out, and this can cause an understandable offense in the larger community as a whole, who feel a natural sense of revulsion to this and all forms of self declared supremacy.
this sense of natural born, spiritual supremacy, prevents them from being able to understand, the emotions and feelings, of what they perceive as lesser beings. the greatest example of this, is their unapologetic, eight decades long, slow motion attempted genocide, of the native semitic people of palestine.
well here is where the bronze age, meets the computer age and their ancient bronze age, weaponized religion, has met the computer age sword of the truth, that cuts through their outdated supremacist bronze age broadside, like a damascus steel scimitar. the false understanding of their “supremacy”, prevents them from making a critical analysis, of their own behavior and the part that it played in their many conflicts, throughout their long history. the only conclusion they seem to draw from this, is they are hated for their choseness, by jealous amalek, or they have failed their god and are being punished, once again for their failures to fulfill their duties to destroy the people their god so detests.
‘the Jewish vendetta against T.S. Eliot, and against his contemporary Ezra Pound. In Anthony Julius’s T.S. Eliot, anti-Semitism and Literary Form, for example, Julius writes that Jews reading Eliot’s poetry are both “appalled and impressed.â€[1] They are appalled because they perceive an unjustified critique upon their ethnic group, and they perceive this critique more acutely because of their ethnocentrism. They are impressed, on the other hand, because they appreciate, and are threatened by, the talent of their target, often despite themselves’
I would say this particularly applies to the writer Celine in France. There Celine is a national treasure and despite themselves cannot bring themselves to properly censor him such was his enormous talent (his three interwar pamphlets notwithstanding- which are excellent by the way, samizdat English translations being available online).
‘it appears that in 1944 Jung oversaw the implementation of quotas on Jewish admission to the Analytical Psychology Club of Zurich. The quotas (a generous 10% of full members and 25% for guest members) were inserted into a secret appendix to the by-laws of the club and remained in place until 1950.[12] ‘
Typo? Did the author mean 1934?
It is worth remembering that even when Jewish science projects are not outright fraudulent they tend to the abstract and impractical. They have no relevance to the real world. Non-Jewish science tends to have an impact on the real world. Alcoholics anonymous was founded by a person influenced by the ideas of Carl Jung. Whatever you think of AA (and some of its criticisms are very trenchant indeed) it has undoubtedly helped more people than (freudian) psychoanalysis has.
Food for thought.
‘What about ancient Israel, Moses, and the prophets, and Jesus Christ?’
Ask the Germans who have since 1945 have paid 100 billion dollars to keep Israel afloat. Ask the Egyptians who the Israelites stole all the precious metals from before leaving Egypt. To judge by Jesus spirit he was not a Jew. Jews are not a culture creating people-deal with it.
It’s merely anti-semitic racism and/or anti-semitic racists. Never say anti-semitic/anti-semite/anti-semitism as free standing in themselves as it blows smoke up the back side and inflates their importance.
Locking and bolting the Jewish creations racist and racism on the end of each of anti-semite/anti-semitic, their own special ‘itics and ism’ buckles the stilts on which those concepts stand, collapses the legs of them and drags (((them))) into their own lexicon and creation.
So it’s just anti-semite racist/anti-semitic racism. Drop it to the level of sh*t…
Also say semiteness and semiticness… (((they HATE it))) yet (((they))) are the cunning stunts that push the disgusting antiwhite slur “whiteness” that sounds like something one needs a sick note, a prescription and a week off work for!
Jesus repeatedly invoked the prophets and Moses. Was he a grifter? Did he not see these as his people?
I think anyone objectively looking at the prophetic wing of the Hebrews (and even the militarist wing) can see that it was indeed a culture. The Ten Commandments that Moses espoused in fact became a cornerstone of Jewish and Christian culture and Western Civilization.
The golden calf wing was was NOT “Jewish”… ever. It was sly, vindictive, degenerate, lawless, murderous and parasitic — then and now. It’s nature is that as Jung charcterizes the “Jew”, in the author’s words: “Jung believed that Jews were incapable of operating effectively without a host society, and that they relied heavily upon grafting themselves into the systems of other peoples in order to succeed.” And in Jung’s words themselves: In The State of Psychotherapy Today Jung wrote: “The Jew, who is something of a nomad, has never yet created a cultural form of his own, and as far as we can see, never will, since all his instincts and talents require a more or less civilized nation to act as host for their development.â€
I submit that the Hebroid was a parasite upon Moses’ Jewish nation. I submit that Jesus eventually divined this through a process of logos. I submit that Jesus became dumbfounded and then angry and then resigned as he realized how deep the rot went — even into his own camp. I submit that’s why these Talmudist/parasite “Jews” had him crucified — because he could see the truth. I submit the parasitiic Dems and Neocon GOP are in the process of crucifying American advocates of the Constitution the same way they’d infiltrated and overthrew the Hebrews in Jesus’ line and replaced the Ten Commandments with the parasitic Talmud — the Golden Calf Ponzi operating manuel. I submit that the one and only way to defeat and destroy these parasites once and for all (hopefully) is to use Moses’ method, and restore the authentic Judeo-Christian/Western Civilization and eventual world civilization ethos.
I can see why so many parasites would be opposed, coasting on the fruits of Jesus Christ’s self-sacrafice for world civilization, and on the fruits of the Golden Calf Ponzi, aka the Anglosphere/ NATOsphere/ ZOG central banks; and on parasitic ZOG’s murderous, pathological drive for control of World Fiat Currency Ponzi.
“Oh, we’re so scared of gentiles!” Liar, liar, liar! You are projecting!
What about it? Ancient events are murky, positively correlated with distance in time.
Jung can be taken as completely correct, for all purposes with a perspective of reliable history and corroborated recording.
Your recitation of ancient history is practically useless. Concentrating on Jung’s observation, determination, basis, and the fitness of the man would be more profitable. Jung is one of the most profound and important figures since Buddha. He is, by definition and description a buddha, a person that comes along once in a while in history that offers insight, explanation and understanding of the totality of the Unified Consciousness, of individuals and collectives of people.
You should ramble on, intellectually.
Video Link
My Goodness, what a waste of time winding your way through the cemeteries of long slipped away myths, and useless mucous. You can reconstruct your machine an infinite number of times in the hopes of utility to Western Civ-or anybody-and it will be the same result: failure and breakdown due to inferior parts of poor specifications and poor design.
The proof is evident omni-directional. Look at the West. Look at it. Your Christianity has failed and is a dissipated, dilated outhouse. Only the marginal Mennonites and Amish make it look good. And the Middle East-totally forgotten, killed everyday-by the all other Christians.
I make the exception to Russian Orthodoxy, which is very different than the cheap, Brand X ripoff that does not remove stains, clean the dirt and grease off surfaces; does not penetrate to do anything. It is useless, not matter how you dress this plastic mannequin.
What a bunch of nonsense. An anthropological God who curses and reveals himself because emotionally HE is upset with what he saw on his inspection rounds.
I was raised in Central Texas, in Bible Belt territory. Every Protestant Church I ever entered had less spirituality than a donut shop or machine shop.
Excellent. The next question is….why does their deceptive and inhuman behavior and proposition work on some people and not others? I mean whole religions, ethnic groups, etc.
That involves cross-cultural considerations, investigations, examinations, et al. Whenever I mention the virtue, necessity, and benefit of comparison, relation, and similar, the silence is deafening. Most people live in a dimly lit, comfortable, unexamined, refurnished interior executed by a happy slappa dappy do dah like themselves. Finding or coming upon anything outside of their strata, circle, class, associations that would possibly upset one’s “friends” is immediately jettisoned and forgotten. Make the turkey the national bird of Amurka, The Land Full of Pee and the Home of Knave.
“I Am Curious (Yellow)”. A movie of meaninglessness by a meaningless film producer, Ingmar Bergman, a potted plant from the soil of a country-Sweden-that is a repository of the most concentrated mental diseases, mass psychosis and neurosis. Piss on it.
“Who Do You Love?” That’s a personal question. Some of the best people I have ever met were expat escapees from Sweden. The hate and disdain they felt for the culture, norms, fetishes, government, character of the people is extreme. Disgust is too mild to describe. Like that gal that escaped from the The Borg.
It’s just like Bo Diddely said.
Video Link
Video Link
That jew writer from the Guardian article pathologizing an unsuspecting German woman simply laughing is really hardcore stuff. That is a level of hatred most people can’t even comprehend. I don’t see how we can possibly coexist with a group of people who have that level of antipathy towards us.
Brilliant.
No kidding.
This mechanism of thinking and human interaction IS exactly the phenomenon entrenched or perhaps entrained in society and the body politic, right here, right now.
And (deliberately ‘And’) it’s accepted as the norm. There’s very little resistance or protest to this process and where such defiance arises the defiant ones are rubbed out of existence by any and all means.
Very perceptive article. Too long to complete but I got the gist, thanks.
I am curious as to where this “Germans hating Jews” comes from? Hitler maybe, but more probably not. Many Jews are German, and identify themselves as German. It is worthy to note many German Jews in America sympathised with the Germans during World War II, and many in fact were interned in the U.S. along with many Germans just like the Japanese where. (check out Dr. Joe Wendel, “Justice Denied: A Historical Sojourn”*) This whole “Germans being Anti-Jew” thing is a bit of an afront to many German Jews as it takes them away from their culture.
Maybe a good bit of this is sheer geo-politics concocted by Americans and Brits who were, and arguably still are out to take down Germany as a Nation? Maybe a good bit of it is being concocted by Israel as it is out to invent its Nation? The suppression of Yiddish to prop up Hebrew serves as an example.
* https://www.amazon.com/Justice-Denied-Historical-Joe-Wendel/dp/1480852791
Jung wrote extensively about what is now referred to as a “near-death experience” that he had after suffering severe injuries in a mountain-climbing accident in or round-about 1948, as I recall. It does not have anything to do per se with this article but is fascinating because of Jung’s vast intellect.
I do not believe NDEs are in any way supernatural; of the ones I have heard, they are expressions of childhood beliefs made vivid. But it could be argued they are preternatural, given that the rational explanation could be one (or combination) of several things, and the “experience” itself is not something that can be readily, and certainly not safely, duplicated.
Somewhat tangentially, what the hell is ‘a distant uncle’? An uncle can’t be like a cousin four times removed. He’s either your mother’s or father’s brother or he’s not an uncle at all.
Freud, G. Stanley Hall (author of “Adolescence: its psychology and its relations to physiology, anthropology, sociology, sex, crime, religion and education”, 1904, and inventor of the term “adolescence”), and Jung
This reminds me of another criticism of Freud I’ve read. His paradigms may well be useful in understanding the psychology of upper-middle class Viennese Jews around the beginning of the twentieth century — but they’re of less relevance to the rest of us. A dog trainer will be great at training dogs; perhaps less so at training horses.
This may well have been true of the quasi-assimilated Jews of Austro-Hungary, Germany, and points west that Jung was familiar with — but was it really true of Jews elsewhere?
I know little about the traditional life of Oriental Jews, but the Jews of Poland and Eastern Europe certainly seem to have fully developed, self-contained cultures — a separate language, theater, popular forms of religion. Those shtetls may not have been pretty, but they do seem to have been culturally complete.
In general, while I am perfectly willing to be labelled an antisemite, I think it’s a mistake to discuss Jews as if they were a single, more or less homogeneous body, as if they were Dutchmen, or even Italians. Did the assimilated German ‘of the Mosaic faith’ really share much with a Galician Hassid? How about with a Yemeni Jew? No one in their right mind would find in their shared Christianity much of a reason to equate Finns with Bolivians. Surely we should at least partially apply the same principle when it comes to the various groups subsumed under the label ‘Jew.’
There is a deep, painful background to what to many appears to be an existential fear of others, of the stranger.
My most recent cue to that situation was in reading one of the late Dr. Leonard Shlain’s books. Shlain, a celebrated brain surgeon and somewhat of a polymath exemplified by his ever-questing and questioning mind…let the cat outta the bag.
Shlain, who celebrated the Bris, that removal of a male’s most sensitive and nerve-ending rich part of his body on the 8th day out of the womb. His claim is based upon that ritual, which features where the innocent boy’s very father and a group of cohorts, take the neonate away from his loving, doting comforting mother into an all-male environment where his limbs are tied down while the Mohel takes out his cutting instrument and removes the very essence of genuine masculinity, his foreskin.
The proud claim which Shlain made was that the Bris, the forceable removal of the baby’s foreskin is the very core, the foundation, the central quality of Judaism.
Imposition of existential fear, anyone?
Think about the psycho-emotional long-term effect of that unkindest cut. How does it effect the psyche, the subconscious…and even the superconscious?
Fear of the other, those outside the patriarchal clannish system…is, as Shlain clearly points out, the germ, the very essence of Judaism.
Judaism is EXCLUSIVE, not inclusive. It is a private club which treats all others as outsiders, as “goyim” or cattle. Does it surprise you that the primary aim of the Zionist Entity in Occupied Palestine is genocidal…to eliminate the “son of Hagar, Abraham’s eldest son”…the Palestinian people, who though primarily descended from the ancient Hebrews…are the genuine owners of Palestine.
Hatred, as perfectly exemplified by the genocide against the residents of Gaza, is NOT a primal emotion. It is not, as all too many believe, the opposite of love. Hatred is a mere derivative. It is based on FEAR.
So is Judaism.
So know you know, that motherly love is replaced by multigenerational imposition of FEAR by a patriarchal gang of fear-ridden wounded-weenies.
Thus is signaled the end of the 6,000 year Epoch of Kali Yuga.
Jung was a disgusting, arrogant, equally inferior thinking bourgeois, univerist parasite. He had zero real idea and even less discernment of true soul, thought, intellect, intelligence and feeling. He was a mediocre asshole and at the end of the war immediately crawled to the Allied criminals to help inculcate feelings of guilt in the devastated and totally abused and decimated Germans. Jung was an absolute arrogant, „noble“ mental swine and if his stinking little soul bit ever gets another human form by the grace of God, it will surely be one of the most pathetic forms – probably as a negroid Jew. If Jung was a “Teutone”, than I am a Jew.
Reading and discussing Jung is a waste of time.
In fact, America has or had much better to offer, e.g. in the form of a Byron Katie, as did Germany. Never trust popularity. The popularization of Jung alone should warn everyone about that bastard of the comfort zone; not to mention his counter fart Freud.
If in need, talk to God, day & night if needed. God will not talk back. God will talk with you by not talking to you. He is doing in doing nothing. In patience (time) keep at it and anything and everything will be nothing. Forget tie wearers and all priests & politicians, the soul mafia. Psychology was and is their new religion culminating in plane violence against the lower earthly casts.
Abstractions engender obstructions. There is no “grundlage”, no foundation undergirding abstract speculations. “Sitzfleisch Philosoph” may or may not be a much used German term. However, it is readily comprehended within that culture. It simply means to think, to rationalize, to speculate while constantly sitting on your ass.
The alphabet which currently dominates much of world literature, whether in the English iterations of the Latin, or of that alphabet’s origin being based on the original Phoenician COMMERCIAL usage; is purely abstract.
Not a single one of the 27 in the English version means anything more than a particular sound or a set of sounds. It is not symbolic or imagistic. Dr. Leonard Shlain claimed in one of his books that one of the foundations for the emergence of the patriarchal ancient Hebrew religion was the mass literacy easily achieved by such an abstraction of reality.
When John Calvin…the name most probably originally have been Cohen…invented the highly supramacist Calvinist heresy of the genuine, but as yet fully informed Protestant Reformation engendered by Martin Luther…he veered far, far away from the spiritual teachings of Jesus and into an essentially insane reconceptualization of the Old Testicles…that totally abstract religious concatenation of the ancient Hebrews.
There is little doubt that the world will need a trans-abstract reformation of our abstract and abstractive alphabet. Such a symbological and imagistic alphabet would be based on easily understood symbols and images reflecting mostly the natural world as well as being attentive to Cosmic Consciousness.
A new age beyond religiosity as well as its antithetical rationalism will find full expression by an alphabet which transmutes abstraction into a formulation rich with symbolism and imagery.
Imagine an alphabet, which employs the current abstracted one into a comfort-zone for the one out of every ten males who are currently considered as dyslexic. Those individuals who have a more balanced mind, where both the abstractive, rationalistic and analytical left brain is enabled to synthesize with the intuitive and imaginative right hemisphere would achieve higher levels of emotional and intellectual empowerment.
Transmutation of the contemporary alphabet might tickle the fancies of the likes of Carl Jung and Rudolf Steiner with the possibility of a unified-field mindscape.
Poupon: You have my full permission to utilize when you feel it to be apt, my long utilized description of what THEY insist is “Judeo-Christian Civilization” to be more properly and historically apt and quite succinctly poignant “JudieChristieMagickMindfuck”. It’s all there, to the point…and really pisses off the terminally deluded.
That is because the camaraderie of the church is so much less authentic.
Fear has two purposes among Jews. First, “antisemitism†is fabricated and used by Jews to instill fear in the host population that refused to crawl to Jews. For example, many nations and individuals are not condemning Jewish savagery and barbarism against the Palestinians because they fear being labelled “antisemitic“. Second, antisemitism-produced fear is a key ingredient to cement Jewish ethnocentrism and Jewish cohesion. For example, Israel uses antisemitism and false flag terrorism to force/convince Jews to migrate to Israel from many countries, including France, Russia and the Middle East, among others. We must overcome the disease of fear and call the Jews what they are; savage barbarians who devoid of moral principles.
They hated Jung because his ‘ symbols and archetypes ‘, challenged the ‘Tarot card rackets ‘ and those palm tickle ‘readings that the ‘ Selectively Blessed ‘ , had been peddling with the side shows of travelling minstrels , and their magic cure all potion salesmen . They also hated him because he recommended they have little Pyramids bound to their heads rather than the cube prayer phylacteries as it played better as a metaphor link to their Egyptian misappropriation myths . Caravans of metaphysical folly . Bearded Freud Ladies included .
Yes, Jews do not analyze their massively anti-social behavior. That is a feature of the sociopathic personality so emblematic of them. Sociopaths, no matter how egregious their own evil deeds, always assume the role of victim.
These people are all crazy and should not be allowed to live among us. Rock bottom principle, all other political/economic/social/cultural issues are negotiable afterwards..
I’m told that for the longest time, the editors/owners at the New York Times were, like all good Jews, under the care — i.e., control — of Freudian shrinks. Very fashionable at the time; think Woody Allen. So naturally, the paper maintained Jung on its Enemies List; no book by/on Jung would be reviewed, or if so, would be trashed; any anti-Jung book would be praised to the skies. Thus, they Times led the way in praising Noll’s absurd books on Jung promoting himself as the “Aryan Christ” etc.
Example 6,000,000 that “freedom of the press” can only be allowed if Jews are not allowed … to own the press.
As much as one might see it as evidence of Jewish ‘paranoia’, the Ronay article is equally infantile mainstream sycophancy.
Along with the ‘family myth’, Yeats really should have highlighted this passage:
So maybe the antagonism the Nazis felt for Jews wasn’t entirely irrational after all?
Perhaps it’s just a coincidence the article was published on June 22, the anniversary of the start of Unternehmen Barbarossa, which from the outset Hitler characterized as a struggle to save Europe from jüdischer Bolschewismus.
Ronay is a very effeminate looking man.
This is your brain on Jewish propaganda.
#1 tourist attraction in Budapest, worship the shoes of the imaginary victims!
Jewish bafflegab. Delete! warning! warning!
Not entirely the case. A second-hand anecdote relayed by a classical musician who had a (((friend))) who was part of an orchestra that toured Europe behind the legendary Hermann Baumann (note that the classical, solo horn repertoire is mostly German — Mozart, Strauss, et al.):
He said that as the concert venues approached Germany, Baumann’s playing increasingly took on a distinctly “German” charicter that disturbed him. This reached a peak in a concert in Baumann’s home town in (as I recall) Bavaria. Although playing the same notes in the same sequence in the same music, the identifiably home-rooted, Germanic self-confidence it communicated terrified him. And this many years ago, when “anti-semitism” in this country was mostly the paranoia of a few overheated imaginations seeking to exploit it — not an idea that would come to mind in a context like classical music.
FWIW
Is it me or is there some validity to the observation that the Manhattan Project, that developed the Atomic Bomb, was loaded with Jews but that the Space program (NASA, Apollo program, etc.) had relatively few Jews?
Just wondering. If so, isn’t it interesting?
Jews are agents of entropy.
The solution is hard to stomach on a moral level.
“Jung .., is, by definition and description a buddha, a person that comes along once in a while in history that offers insight, explanation and understanding of the totality of the Unified Consciousness, of individuals and collectives of people.
One 100% agree. I owe Jung a great deal. However, what have you against Moses, Jesus and Muhammad and all those in between.
Jung and Buddha didn’t come along, they were sent as others were. That makes all the difference and speaks volumes about your rebellion.
So take your own advice and let’s all ramble on until the time comes when all the veils are lifted and all doubt has vanished. Then only then, shall your soul remember the Covenant it made befoe it was placed in its temporary container.
Peace.
Sorry, Coupon Marx but I must take it up with you.
What was Protestantism if not the looting of the Catholic Church and kicking all the poor off the lands pledged to the church. Which ended up deprive them from a life of some subsistence into homelessness in the big cities. There, they got Shanghaid onto English pirate ships. Then the Bank was allowed onto a pious nation who ended up spreading slaughter and corruption in almost every corner of this planet until this day.
Protestantism has been established as Prosperity Christianity in deed, and you blame your Creator for this?
My God is the same one as yours and He has been merciful and kind more than I deserve. Every trial has been a lesson for improvement and better choices.
Peace
I hear much criticism of the OT for saying jews will rule over all and are chosen. True, if they keep the Covenant.
Pure religious lunacy. Religious supremacism. I always find it amazing how those who claim to be “Jew-wise” worship a Jew called Jesus Christ as God as well as put any stock at all in the collection of books Jews wrote that we call the Bible, though I could certainly include Islam and Muslims in this as well as they too revere Jewish figures such as Abraham and Mary and even Jesus. It’s a sickness afflicting billions of people.
Video Link
The most important reason to expect psychological differences among the various Jewish isolates is that their differing relations to the host society would have imposed differing evolutionary selection pressures on their psychological makeup. For example, tax farming seems never to have been an occupation of Yemeni Jews.
Well done, a fascinating article.
I would love to see a piece examining why and how Alexander Solzhenitsyn was completely erased from the world’s cultural landscape. Maybe he pissed somebody off or something.
I suppose it’s worth noting.
Honestly, I don’t know about NASA, including especially early NASA (the Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo projects) — but it’s true that many prominent Jewish theoreticians worked on the Manhattan Project — there were also many scientists and engineers who worked on the more practical, engineering aspects of the project, e.g. John von Neumann (born into a Jewish family, he converted to Catholicism later) is generally credited with the important theoretical work demonstrating the workability of implosion, whereas George Kistiakowsky (he was not Jewish) oversaw construction of the explosive lenses and the first actual implosion device.
Apart from celestial/orbital mechanics, as well as aspects of inertial guidance, I think the space program was perhaps more an engineering challenge.
“In Jung’s phrasing, “the Jews have this particularity in common with women; being physically weaker, they have to aim at the chinks in the armour of their adversary.—
Which could explain why the White Christian suburban women are gulled into to voting for the Jewish, er, Democrat Party, repeatedly, despite the fact that the party’s agenda is anti majority.
There is some truth in the text, but it is essentially tendentious.
On a personal level, Sabina Spielrein was his mistress (actually, Freud rightly chastised him for misusing the transference phenomenon); out of 3 female executors of his will, 2 were of Jewish ancestry.
His most productive followers were Jewish, for instance Erich Neumann and James Hillman.
But, more important are Jung’s theoretical confusions.
Jung considered, as did most people of his time, that ethnicities, “racesâ€, cultures… possess unique behavioral/psychological characteristics (which is probably true). Just, it is difficult to ascertain those without lapsing into trivial stereotypes (Germans are organized & cold, Italians are warm & chaotic,…). Jung’s psychology is best called Archetypal psychology (although this term is applied to Jung’s disciple James Hillman’s psychology), although the name Analytical/Depth psychology is usually used.
The problem with Jung is that he is not clear on whether his psychology is essentially materialist or idealist. He himself was contradictory re. this central issue. If he is a materialist like Freud, psychological traits are modes of consciousness produced by brain & evolution. If, on the other hand, he is idealist like Plato & Hegel, then there are invisible dimensions/worlds our 3+1 dimensional empirical world is a manifestation thereof, and his archetypes are not just common nuclei of specifically human consciousness, but they exist in extra-physical & extra-temporal realms which are primordial & supraordinate essences of empirical material reality . Plato’ allegory of the cave in “The Republic†is the most famous example. In materialist interpretation, all that psychologically happens is, basically, inside our skull; in an idealist approach, human consciousness can be transferred to other, non-physical realities & can function without a brain.
Jung never resolved this crucial point.
On the lower level, he never succeeded to differentiate between collective & universal unconscious. Even if we toss aside metaphysics of fundamental world-view (which is impossible in Jung’s case) & remain in the field of psychological processes alone, we are still left with the question: are archetypes “collective†in the sense they are basic substructures (and superstructures) of psychological functioning of human collectives (races, ethnicities, cultures, religions,..)- or, perhaps, archetypes are universal for the entire humankind?
And do they change in time? Does a typical Australian Abo possess virtually the same archetypes as a cultured European? And how do we differentiate between archetypes & universal symbols? And how many archetypes are out there, anyway?
It seems that Jung, at least for a time, juggled with the idea that archetypes are quasi-racial, so that English would frequently dream of seas, Germans of forests & Arabs of deserts.
What about Jews? What about their dreams?
Jung thought they should, statistically, dream about deserts (the Levant), but they had dreams just like his other patients.
An amusing illustration of this silliness is his treatment of a young female patient of Jewish ancestry (thoroughly assimilated). Typical female neurotic stuff about romances, sex, jealousies, narcissism etc.
Jung “wisely” concluded that she lacked spiritual connection with her “race”, so sent her off with advice to immerse in the study of Kabbalah.
I don’t think the lady was cured.
To resist this kind of psychic projection, a deeper understanding and adherence to Christ is helpful. Jung made this clear. Go against the pressure. Mystical Christianity, especially that found in the spiritual traditions of Christianity and its sacramental life is a necessity.
The Reformation opened the door to a vulnerability to Jewish projections. Try going to the secret practices Christ left us. Jung would certainly agree. He’s written of it extensively.
Titties.
Jewish fears are self-inflicted. Their insistence to publicly relive their false historic suffering is not working as before. Having their own country at other’s expense has been their boon and their bane.
The sickness is religion itself.
The sooner humanity leaves this childish wish-thinking in the dustbin of history, the better.
I read a great quote from James Balwin the other day: “Not everything that is faced can be changed, but nothing can be changed until it is faced.”
We need to face up to the fact that we’ve been buying into ridiculous fairy tales.
Jewish created feminism and sexual revolution gave women more many vulnerable chinks in the male armor to attack. Never underestimate the female revenge based hissy fit for the stupidest of things. The fit may not benefit women, but culpability for our actions isn’t really a thing in white cultures. White men better figure out a solution for their female kryptonite. Since the “pussy’ protest to the never ending abortion debate, I’ve come to the conclusion we white gals as a collective entity are completely and hopelessly puerile. We are great weapons of mass destruction for the Jew.
Two Thousand Years Together guaranteed he would be erased from history, if the kosher parasites are allowed to maintain their monopoly of the cultural and political zeitgeist.
Ron Unz will be erased from history as well, and he knows it. Pro-Palestinian kosherites will be erased…
Eventually the kikes and their zoglodyte stooges piss off enough people, and get whacked. Only to build themselves up again…
Jesus Christ was trying to whack the Hebroids for a good, long time. And he succeeded. So too the best of the Prophets; so too Moses.
But organized crime and grifting has an incredible appeal to easy money parasites and their whores (zoglodytes). And as the preeminent grifters of all time, the Golden Calf gang will always run the racket. And they’ll always go through the most elaborate means to make it illegal, dangerous and even deadly to criticise them or challenge them.. And the worthless, gutless smurfs will take the cues, and go about their business, heads down, like good church mice.
This is how they become slaves to kikes.
Every goy is an anti Semite, not the Jew’s fault at all. lol. Mary Shelley’s “Frankenstein “ and Bram Stoker’s “Dracula†were labeled anti Semitic. The Count was a bloodsucker, and feared the Cross? Well there is a COHENcidence there for sure. In the movie, “Draculaâ€, Bela Lugosi is even seen wearing a 6 pointed medallion that resembles The Star Of David.
A distinction needs to be made between the adherents to the Torah and those who threw the Torah over their shoulder and authored their satanic Talmude. The Talmude is where the, too strict, commandments are changed to benefit the psychopaths.
If you think the Torah Jews are the same as the Talmudists, ask the Palestinians. The Torah Jews, without exception live among the Palestinian neighborhoods for some measure of safety from the harassment of zionist Talmudists.
The Talmude is the Frankestine of Judaism. They are the psychopaths, who surround themselves with more psychopaths from other creeds.
Fo those interested in the topic: Richard Noll- a Catholic- wrote a bestseller “The Aryan Christ” on Jung (and his alleged anti-semitsim). It’s here: https://libgen.is/book/index.php?md5=A01C3FE525D8CF1589F671874E70E86D , https://epdf.tips/the-aryan-christ-the-secret-life-of-carl-gustav-jung.html
James Hillman,a Jungian psychologist (Jewish), would have none of this: http://www.soulworks.net/writings/paradigms/site_026.html
I understand that you favor Jung over Freud because, as you say, you are nurtured more by “organic” than “critical” thinking. You also say, though, that there is insufficient critical thinking in much of the Jungian community. I’m curious to know what you think of Richard Noll’s books, The Aryan Christ and The Jung Cult.
I hate them. I think he’s a shit.
Um, that’s a pretty strong statement.
Well, I think the books are mean-spirited. Noll was rejected by the Jung community and this is revenge.
Me, too.
You done spoke a parable there! Despite the incessant invocations of God, Bible-belt Protestantism seems so worldly.
I studied some Austrian literature from circa 1900 as part of my university course, and Vienna around that time really was a special case, culturally and socially. Making wider assumptions about the human race from it is certainly questionable.
The Abrahamic whatevers are sitting in the audience, while Buddha is the leader of the symposium. The difference among these corporate startups and Buddha is stark. For one thing, Buddha lead a life seeking perfection and nirvana (different than the common conception), his depth of thought and “places ” he reached far exceed any of the fore mentioned. Buddha took off from the airport, while the others just taxied on the ground.
I’ve written a lot on Buddha over the years, and feel not the need to retread this same ground for the nth time. The concept/construct of the “soul” is a limited one for a sub-literate, mass audience.
I can’t believe that your comment comes from actually reading Jung’s works. I believe I’ve read everything he produced and watched a number of the interviews he gave.
It’s dishonest to critique anyone for what they didn’t resolve. His discovery of the archetypes, which cost him immense personal introspective suffering, is the most important psychological development of the twentieth century. He revealed the basic four or five and acknowledged that there might be more, but that minor types are probably unimportant for general purposes.
If you bring together Husserl’s phenomenology and Jung’s universal unconscious, you have the deepest understanding of the human psyche. It’s not an accident that those two powerful philosophers supped intellectually from the same trough in the interwar years in Germany-Austria.
It’s also not accidental that they both became apologists for traditional Christianity as they grew older.
80,000 Jews live in Budapest.
I think it goes further than that. Jews aren’t some single people who evolved to fit different niches, like, say, some Germans becoming farmers in Iowa and others brewers in Pennsylvania.
It’s a matter of often utterly different groups of people in completely different places who merely happened to come to practice the same religion. As Israel often involuntarily demonstrates, these people are often at least as alien to each other as they once were to their gentile neighbors.
That one made me smirk and remember something I read years ago in Ram Dass’ classic Be Here Now:
In the traditional Hindu system that Ram Dass — himself a Jewish psychologist, born Richard Alpert — is referencing, the first chakra, the lowest, represents the anus (excretion), while the second represents the gonads (sex) and the third (stomach) represents hunger and thirst. The fourth chakra, however, represents the heart, which unites the lower three chakras just mentioned with the higher three — larynx (speech), pineal gland (consciousness), and crown (transcendence). Of course, it makes perfect sense that Jewish psychoanalysis would seek to entrap us in the lower chakras, which we share with the animal kingdom. That would make us all easier to herd and tame, just like cattle or sheep!
Your message would have been more genuinely comprehensive had you specified that the form of Protestantism which you characterized was specifically ENGLISH and was the product of Henry VIII and his aristocratic coterie.
The bank$ter takeover of England was basically the product of Oliver Cromwell and his apparent compact with the evil ones who emerged from the precincts of Amsterdam.
Like all other manmade institutions, the Catholic Church has its warts as well…consider the Inquisition and the current fake Pope.
Well conceptualized. If the ruptured republic had a valid educational system, a curriculum including various philosophical insights and traditions would feature those of the East, most particularly the Vedic wisdoms from India and the I Ching divination centering on the Tao…the sense of balance between spirit, soul, body and mind.
Where the Western traditions centering on Constantine’s religion, went off the rails was with the repression of Eros as the higher iteration of the Second Chakra. Animal sexuality is innate in the human majority. Acceptance and realization of the original Hellenic understandings of Eros, allows individuals to transcend the common fixation on the breeding process as the one and only. In this again, the Vedic traditions transcended the primitive.
No.
If you have read much Jung it is clear he wrote everything down. And he did not write much about Jews even though Sigmund Freud was his single most important teacher. Sigmund wrote tons more about Jews than Jung did. His work on National Socialism (something Wotan something–I forget the exact title) is far more anti Nazi than it is anti Jew. Only someone with an axiom that one can never say anything negative about Jews could interpret Jung as anti Jew. You have to be ignorant of Jung to think, say, or write that.
About the music you posted, many thanks!!
An instinctive reflex because chaos is jew friendly
The hystericized subject of this informative piece does have a point about German forest clearings.
Poseurs.
The only iteration of traditional Christianity which may well still exist within the Western world after another two or three generations have come to be; is the Eastern Orthodox tradition, particularly the Russian variant.
Constantine’s Bible is NOT anything vaguely resembling the spirituality which was exemplified amongst the first couple centuries of the current era…waaay too much redaction, interpolation and the removal of uncomfortable truths, such as the near total denigration of the reality of spirit, which lives on in many lifetimes.
In order to control the masses of the people, Heaven and Hell, along with Augustine’s concept of Original Sin; were introduced into “Holy” Mother Church.
Having read my share of Jung’s Real-Eye-Zation of archetypes, along with universal consciousness; it is more probable that his directionality was embracing elements of Christianity as a holding-pattern against the spiritually vacuous rationalistic materialism which to this day rules the roost in academia…and was mostly unchallenged intellectuality during Jung’s lifetime.
Having not read Husserl, I cannot comment on his perspectives. However, I do see Jung as having some depth understanding of Cosmic Conscious in that his point of view leads to the conclusion that All are One, as One is All and that the Whole is equal to yet greater than the sum of the parts. His thinking was transmutational.
Jung’s vision was universalist rather than particularist and sectarian.
Viewing the entire Christian proposition…post Constantine…there never has been included the understanding of the Caduceus…that of the soul being inherent within our DNA…while the spirit is a co-equal but separate entity…a hologram of Creator as Rupert Sheldrake has posited. Thus, while the soul energy is reproductive in essence, likely the highest formulation of our mammalian heritage, the spirit is eternal.
For better or worse, things like this become genetically encoded over time. Too bad for the afflicted population.
This “shape-shifting” nature of “anti-semitism” means that the definitions are also changing: before, it used to mean someone who disliked Jews, but now it means anyone who doesn’t openly, explicitly and unequivocally demonstrate a positive view of the Jews.
That means you can’t be ambivalent either, at one point showing your love for the Jews and then later on criticizing them for their behavior. You can praise them 99 times, but if on the hundreth round you make a critical remark, then your whole history of righteousness will be wiped out in a single fell swoop. This obviously applies to Jung, and Bursten admits as much in the following paragraph:
We are on a slippery Jew slope when it comes to the definition of anti-semitism: it is all downhill from here. The Antisemitism Awareness Act, after it is passed, will eventually function retroactively: anyone with any type of critical remark on the Jews in their past will be cancelled, fired or worse. And the Jews are collecting the evidence against each and every “anti-semitic” internet user in these huge NSA databases out in Utah for leisurely perusal at a latter date, when they will finally implement what they have been preparing for millennia: the day of reckoning for the hated “anti-semitic” goys.
Where’s there’s money and political power you’ll find Jews that will feed off these things. Parasites.
So telling.
The propagandists of “Anti-Semitism” only have themselves to blame.
Un-Semitic Jews which run Israhell are the true Anti-Semites, and the true self-hating Jews, otherwise the self-destruction Israhell is meting itself with wouldn’t happen if they were not so self-hating.
Its as if they would rather die than admitting they are part of the Humanity.
So many jews are simply hyper-brainwashed.
For them life is a never ending Rorschach test, whereby every inkblot is “anti-semitism”, or the holocaust, or a pile of shoes, or Hitler. They’re literally pathological with this shit. It’s exhausting, and a big part of the reason that so many of us just don’t give a shit anymore. A shapeshifting phantom indeed.
I’m reminded of the little documentary that a jew made, whereby he was going to investigate, and find some anti-semitism. His own grandmother told him it was all a bullshit lie, that jews tell themselves, and each other, to spread fear, and justify their actions. Anyway, the most illuminative part was when he followed a group of jewish school children, adolescents, making their little pro-holocaust pilgrimage to Germany, so they could get good and brainwashed about the evils of anti-semitism. In it, these kids are told that it isn’t safe for them to leave their hotel at night, because an angry mob of anti-semites are outside, waiting to harm them. Of course, it was all bullshit, but this is the crap they are taught.
In the end, the filmaker was convinced that his grandmother was 100% right, and that it was all, almost entirely, a giant fear-porn lie.
As Unz has described- imagine multiple generations of this kind of brain washing and irrational fear mongering, and their fascination/intoxication with the endless noble victim tales of oppression and infinity holocausts? Then add all that “God’s Chosen People” bullshit to that mix!
Also, jews are hands down the most neurotic group on the planet! Hence, psychology, is a totally jewish invention, tailor made for an excessively neurotic people with absurdly neurotic psyches.
In many ways, it’s the same thing that makes jews pretty funny, or creative, etc., a.k.a Woody Allen or Seinfeld (the show). being a nervous, neurotic, anal fixated (in the Freudian sense) jew is funny, when they aren’t destroying your culture, country, and society.
But this whole theme of passing down endless myths and lore about everyone in their family being killed in the holocaust, or nearly killed, or escaping… they’re raising one generation- of batshit crazy hyper-neurotic, terrified, seeing anti-semitism coming out of the woodwork, jewish kids after another.
Good God, if you take a people already predisposed to neurosis, and brainwash them with generational holocaust fear-porn, over and over again, for their entire lives, you are most certainly going to end up with nut jobs, referenced in this article, that “see” the holocaust in every train, bicycle, or pair of shoes in Germany!
And what are we seeing today with blacks in all the Western nations? A start of the same shit! Telling them that everyone, everything, and every time has been the most racist EVER! The roads are racist, so is the weather, so is milk, good food, having a father… it’s all racism! The difference is, that in a different way from the jews neurotic responses of paranoia and “oy vey!”, the blacks become murderous street savages.
And what’s the solution to all of this? Stop integrating different people! Period. Let all the jews go live in Israel, (until the Muslims kill them for being terrorists) or wherever, the blacks can all go back to Africa and enjoy their non-racial Wakanda paradise, all the Asians can go live with their kind, and so can Muslims, Arabs, and whatever other mutts that are so fixated on living with Whites, so they can complain about Whites for eternity. GTFO!
You don’t see us Whites going to live with any of them, and bitching about it endlessly. Why? Because we are smart, and don’t want to live with a bunch of mutts, complaining about them. because that’s what perennial victims do, not fully fledged human beings.
Also, another solution would be to charge jews $100 for every time they use the word “anti-semitism” verbally, or in print. Eventually, their thrift would fix it.
You’re out in the weeds, here. Without Buddha, there would be no Jung. Contradiction is just an appearance. All that you wrote about Jung is and isn’t, at the same time. There is zero value and valence in trying to make sense of your digital, discreet contracts, made by locked in Western Epistemology, categorization, materialistic and the insecurity of leaving the sensate world behind. You missed the boat.
Is it this or that? Neither, both. Jung did not write a cookbook. Yours is another, still, undergraduate over simplification, reduction, and highly filtered product. As in reverse osmosis, what comes out is tasteless, odorless, and a complete loss of nutrients and flavor, as in a liquid stock.
Your attempt at elucidation is a dud. Describing the Unconscious using a direct, one to one simulacrum is like using a storeroom inventory list to chart ones way into what cannot be directly perceived or circumstantiated.
Christian culture still has a heartbeat but the religion itself is fading fast.
The observation that you take exception to has a finer point on it than you are broadening it out to become. In doing that you risk being guilty of constructing a straw-man.
The point made was that ((They)) act as parasites. Furthermore, what you offer as evidence really refutes your position. As parasitical of other cultures (the thesis you take exception to) ((They)) will largely mimic each different culture and therefore not be evidently homogeneous, except in the particular idiosyncrasies of parasitism and the other known subversive tendencies.
It’s not an issue of how are they acting and is it okay? And are we being hypocrites by objecting? It’s an accurate observation that they do this cultural parasitism thing. The ((Bankers)) in The City of London are not culturally like the ((Bankers)) of Mexico City. They have located within hosts, and taken on host culture, while keeping separate, dissembling, subversive, and as calculating enemies of the host states. That’s the point that one needs grasp and not let loose.
Very few Jews can be trusted. Those that can-and I have known a few-are worth it. They are usually deracinated. I look for objectivity. I had to force myself to objectively evaluate contemporary Greece, its people-my people-as they are, not a fairy tale or imagination.
Most believe that generalization and stereotyping are inappropriate. That’s because their knowledge of the subject is too shallow and restricted. Generally speaking, for men, stay away from Jewish women.
Perhaps more importantly, the ‘antisemitic’ club causes people to mute and qualify their criticism. If, after all, we were discussing the Japanese committing the Rape of Nanking, or the Germans murdering thousands of Jews in Babi Yar, most of us would be unhesitant in our denunciations, and might well indulge in abuse of Japanese and Germans in general — and feel pretty good about it. Feel you must qualify your condemnation of the Khmer Rouge in some way? Say some nice things about ISIS?
Presumably not. But when it comes to Israel — thanks to the antisemitism club — even most critics daren’t voice more than the most qualified lack of enthusiasm for the ongoing slaughter in Gaza, even though it’s happening right now, and has been happening every day for nearly nine months now.
People keep feeling they mustn’t give the impression they’re antisemitic. Why should it be their problem? If the Jews don’t like it, let them stop killing. Then they can complain if they find they’re still not liked. In 1943, nobody said we mustn’t say mean things about Germans. It was around 1960 that letting Germans back into the club became fashionable.
Ditto for Jews. Let them abjure Israel — or at least get it to stop killing. Then we can see about not worrying about whether they have a foreskin or not. But it’s up to them.
Not us.
The article is about Jew obsession with Jungs writing, however many or few, of Jews. Jung wasn’t obsessing, he was just observing.
when i read the torah (old testament) as a boy i was horrified by the description of the god of israel. i couldn’t understand why people would submit themselves to a god that seemed so incongruous to my idea of what a god would be. i felt nothing but revulsion and have never comfortable with any of the abrahamic religions.
the first spiritual book that i found any resonance with, was the tao te ching, which led me to the notion of the mother of the myriad creatures, or mysterious female. this book was my gateway to the femine divine, which then led me into an interest in the ancient mystery religions. the tao te ching describes the great mother as the mysterious female, or she that is darker than any mystery, the unknowable.
i developed a deep interest in the egyptian religion and it’s mythos, which reflects a metaphorical attempt to describe the unknowable mysteries of our existence, as well as a history of the people, with history being his story, their own version of the truth.
as i entered into this study, i was struct by the similarities of the egyptian mythos with the hebrew mythos. it seemed to me that most of the torah was acculturated from the egyptian but the story was inverted to make the bad guys into the good guys. no greater example of this than set, the jealous, bitter, desert storm god of chaos, murdering his brother ausar (osiris), the rightful pharaoh to usurp his throne. in the egyptian version set murders his brother and chops his body in 14 pieces and scatters them, so he can never be resurrected. set is the ultimate bad guy in the egyptian story. now in the torah seth, ambushes nimrod the mighty hunter and chops his body into pieces and sends them out across the land to serve as a warning to near by states.
i see great parallels between struggle of the hyksos invaders (that had conquered northern egypt, due to their superior technologies of iron age weapons, horses and chariots), and the people of horus, of southern egypt. the hyksos were accepted as pharaohs of northern egypt for 250 years, even though they would only accept the egyptian god set, who they saw as a direct analog of their own desert storm god. their last pharaoh took the name apep, who was the arch nemesis of the sun god ra, a tremendous affront to the native egyptians. apep killed the pharaoh of southern egypt as well as his first born son. the queen took her young son ahmose l, further south and reestablished her court and had her young son trained to lead their military and upon reaching the age of 18, he led the army of egypt down the nile and defeated the hyksos in every nome of egypt, eventually driving them out of egypt and back into the desert along with the egyptian god set who was banished from their pantheon.
moses did not lead the hebrews slaves out of egypt, ahmose l, drove out the hyksos invaders. the bible tells us moses was a murderer, who killed an egyptian royal and hid his body under the sand, and spent 40 years in the desert before returning and “freeing the hebrew slaves”. the body of seqenenre tao, father of ahmose l, was mummified, but had obviously suffered a violent death with 5 axe wounds to the head and had been first burried before mummification, which would explain the grimace upon his face, so uncharacteristic of an egyptian royal, as his body had desicated in the sand.
i was never really interested in jung or psychology, until i started to understand the various deities, as archetypes of the human psyche. as well as the divisions within the psyche, the egyptians referred to them as the ahk, ba, ab, and ka, that our soul, if you will, is multi level and at times conflicted between these levels. through integration and alignment of these levels we are able to access, higher levels of consciousness and begin to understand our own minds, actions and desires, allowing us to draw down, our devine and eternal nature, into this illusory realm of temporal existence, empowering us to live our lives to our full potential.
i believe this information to be encoded within us, within our very dna and this is the true mystery of life, to realize this illusion of what we perceive to be the very cosmos itself and in doing so realize our true place within this mystery.
Thanks. Good music NEVER goes out of style. I was fortunate to live through the 50s, 60s, 70s music that combined and fused so many influences.
Video Link
Jung (Freud also) was a metaphysician, not a scientist. It cannot be said with certainty whether his archetypes exist at all. This is more like a poetic metaphysics than anything exact, close to religion- but definitely not a science even in the weakest sense of the word.
But let’s criticize him “from within”.
For the collective-universal conundrum:
How had Jung treated his archetypal symbols as manifestations of the supposedly ethnic/racial unconscious? Ambivalently, or to be precise- confusingly.
Jung seems to have remained confused about his basic theories. He sometimes interprets the collective unconscious as truly collective, ie. ethnic/racial & in other instances as universally human. Then, he mixes archetypes & symbols. Archetypes should be primordial human psychological universals (self, shadow/inner devil, animus/eternally masculine, anima/eternally feminine), while symbols are more numerous (trickster, king, fool, mother, father, … basically all Tarot cards symbols put together & more).
Even if we limit ourselves to symbols & interpret his collective unconscious as ethnic/racial, the entire picture remains unclear. Jung’s basic errors are to be found in over-psychologizing. His approach to religion is purely psychological, at least in most cases. He wouldn’t answer the question: is your religious experience a reflection of some deeper non-physical underlying Reality, or not? Is it potentially more than psychological- just, you can’t say it aloud because it is not convenient in the modern world, or it remains a web of psychological, and only psychological structures?
Another weakness is Jung’s ahistorical approach. He psychologizes the entire human endeavor- perhaps including exact sciences?- and at the same time he is happily oblivious to the social, economic, cultural, historical… circumstances.
His stress on timelessness of deeper layers of psyche left him vulnerable to any common sense criticism. For instance, when Nazis came to power in 1933, Jung wrote an essay wherein he claimed that Wotan/Odin had slept for thousand years & was now awoke. Evidently, he thought that ethnic German unconscious, fired by Nazi pagan iconography & ideology, had awoken subliminal Homo Teutonicus who had dreamed all along since the beginning of time, with all his passions & drives. This is a nice picture, but- when was Wotan buried in German consciousness, supraconscious or subconscious? Where are dreams of other Teutonic nations- Danes, English, Dutch, Norwegians, Flemings or Swedes? When did a part of Germanic tribes become a modern German nation? When & how did this suppression of Wotan into the collective German unconscious happen?
Jung had been writing about possession of Germans by subliminal Teutonic psychological powers symbolized in the figure of Wotan/Odin, while ignoring more prosaic explanations of political & cultural turmoil, a sense of humiliation after WW1, economic depression… Of course he did not ignore them completely, but his reductionist approach described this historical upheaval as something that is basically psychological & would not have happened to another nation (why not to another Teutonic nation? Unclear).
Could it be that, as in Jungian earlier phases, that various human races & sub-races possess different collective unconscious? Jungian Collective Unconscious is, in its classical exposition, the superconsciousness of archetypes that belong to all humankind (Self, Anima, Animus,… and its symbols as the Fool, Trickster, Axis Mundi etc.). A more appropriate term would be the Universal Unconscious.
Just, in early stages of its development, Jung thought of it as something quasi-racial. So, Northern “races†(Germans, English,..) would dream of, say, woods, snow & polar bears; Jews & Arabs would be dreaming of the desert, oases & camels.
Only, Jung dropped this idea & there is not a shred of evidence that this “racial†unconscious exists. Whether his universal archetypes exist is also problematic, but “racial†ones certainly don’t.
Unoriginality & confusion
Jung- I won’t write again on his confusion of superconsciousnes & the subconscious, which was much better explained in Roberto Assagioli’s pyschosynthesis and Gerda Walther’s phenomenology- did not understand what more perspicacious & erudite scholars or psychiatrists like Henry Corbin, Mircea Eliade, Roberto Assagioli, …or old authors like Evelyn Underhill grasped- Jung’s variant of psychology is just a refurbishing of ancient Gnosis, shadowed by Jung’s misunderstanding of differences between psychology and pneumatology, or Soul-oriented world view and Self-oriented world view. Is it a coherent Gnosis or not?
Let’s see historical-cultural metaphysical parallels:
Plotinus
The One, Good, God
Universal Intellect, Nous, “Male Principle†– Universal Soul, Psykhe, “Female Principleâ€
Kabbalah, Judaism
Keter, God
Chokmah, “Male†– Binah, “Femaleâ€
Sufism, Islam
God, Allah
Aql-i-Kulli, Universal Mind, “Male†– Nafs-I-Kulli, Universal Soul, “Femaleâ€
Chinese synthesis, Neo-Confucianism
T’ai Ch’i, God
Chien, Male- Kun, Female
Christianity
God the Father
Christ, Logos — Spiritus Sanctus
India, Kashmir
Paramashiva, God
Shiva, “Male†– Shakti, “Femaleâ€
Vajrayana Buddhism
Shunya, Buddha Nature, Source
Karuna, compassion, “Male†— Prajna, wisdom, “Femaleâ€
So, Jung just transcribed old metaphysics- his Self is, supposedly, a psychological reflection of God, his Anima of The Female Principle & his Animus of the Male Principle.
The Devil/Shadow has nothing “archetypal” about it, it was Jung’s invention & all ancient high schools of Gnosis don’t treat it as an “entity” at the level of the trinity mentioned.
His quaternity is a misfire.
As far as Hermetism goes, it is a sort of Gnosis, i.e. the world-view which differentiates between spirit/spark/divine entity and soul/psychic entity which we experientially are, give or take, and which eventually goes to dust or is absorbed by the divine entity, which is our essential self (not the empirical self).
Gnosis in general, and Gnosticism in particular (in its numerous variants) teach that essential human being, Anthropos, is androgynous. Needless to say, this supposed being lives supra-physical life & his/her “fall†into the world of temporality & matter is a part of the creation-fall myth of origin.
In Western milieu, it is best described in the Corpus Hermeticum, 1st C AD, when androgynous & eternally aware Anthropos falls from the world of Mind/Nous into this world of sleep & sexuality. Other than that, this story is retold in virtually all high Perennialist doctrines, east & west (Greece, China, India, Tibet, Christian Gnosticism, Hermetism, variants of Kabbalah, Sufism, ..). Basically, it is the fall of the Divine Man, containing all sexual attributes & transcending them, into this empirical, sexualized world of birth & death (from plants to humans).
Unlike Plotinus, for whom “man†is a conglomerate of matter and soul- and soul possessing the divine, noetic element/part, for Gnostics “man†is essentially Anthropos, the divine man who existed before the Fall in the world of Nous & who acquired psychic and material segments of existence “falling†through psychic and material “worldsâ€. So, for them, the true resurrection is the awakening of the anthropos, who is “asleepâ€- although not completely: he is always divine and ever guiding the sleepy part, as well as soul & other parts. The true goal is deification, when fully awakened anthropos/inner man/divine man will go back to the world of Nous and even further, to put is poetically, to “swim†in the ocean of Theos/God, having absorbed all experiences & subtle elements of the psychic life.
In short, with Neo-Platonists (and Christians & other religionists) you end up in Heaven/Paradise contemplating God; for Gnostics, you return to God & swim in its plenitude- without losing individuality- because you are essentially of the same “substance†(whatever that may mean).
And last- Jung wasn’t clear whether his “ego” is the projection of the Transcendent/Higher Self or something else. Jung’s Self both contains psyche & is the nucleus of it- which is confusion.
A clearer approach is offered in Assagioli’s psychosynthesis:
Here is the difference between more Neo-Platonic & Hermetic oriented theologians.
For the first category, man is essentially the soul which has the noetic “partâ€. This is the dominant current. Hermetically oriented people think that man’s “sparkâ€, anthropos or inner man, “I”-is of the same nature as Nous/Transpersonal Self. This is the position of Roberto Assagioli. And some modern thinkers, although technically Catholic like Gerda Walther, consider the “I center†(inner self, Jung’s “ego”, Eckhart’s scintilla animae, Gnostics’ “Man of Light” or Photeinos Anthropos) of man transcending even the Nous and coming straight from the Godhead/Absolute, the Unmanifest God. Here, Atman = Brahman.
So Jung was oscillating between Neo-Platonism and Hermetism, not understanding where he stands & offering his therapy as something new, while essentially it was old wine in new bottles.
Do they always do this? Ashkenazim in Eastern Europe were so unconcerned with mimicking the surrounding Slav peasants that they refused to speak the same language and demonstrated an almost pathological aversion to farming.
Of course there were the ‘Germans/Hungarians/Austrians of Mosaic faith’ — but did Yemeni, Moroccan, Persian, Bokharan Jews really fall into this category, or that of the Eastern European Ashkenazim? I would guess that mimicry leads most often to absorption. Chinese Jews, for example…what Chinese Jews? They seem to have evaporated at some point in the early Nineteenth Century. The conversos in Portugal were more or less left in peace to secretly practice their religion so long as they turned up for mass every Sunday — after a while, they started believing the priest and forgot about why they did these extra things. The example I recall from a documentary was two little old ladies who covertly lit a candle behind drawn curtains every Friday night — but for the life of them couldn’t explain why, or even why it had to be hidden.
The modern Western secular Jew is indeed a menace — but perhaps a transitory one. He’ll vanish. Pretend you’re a goy and you become a goy — and if not you, then your grandson. What will remain are the Hasidim et al — not exactly a jewel in anyone’s crown, but not necessarily a dire threat.
“You can praise them 99 times, but if on the hundreth round you make a critical remark, then your whole history of righteousness will be wiped out in a single fell swoop.”
Isn’t ex-Fox journalist Tucker Carlson a good example of this? One false article and you must go.
It’s about a self-esteem problem.
If I think and believe that I’m perfect or ‘chosen’ then I have raised myself above all critique. It hurts my self-esteem // is an insult to my unreal or false perception of myself.
Face To Face | Carl Gustav Jung (1959)
Professor Jung is interviewed at his home in Switzerland by John Freeman.
Video Link
“I don’t see how we can possibly coexist….”
“we” Whites will not have to “co-exist” with the Jews:
because Whites – thanks to the Jew-engineered wars, kosher Culture of Death, & open borders – are going quickly extinct….
% of world population White:
1900: 30%
now: 7%
2100: long gone.
Catholic girls!:
Video Link
Jung declared many times that he was “only” a psychologist. Your indictment of him is an indictment of someone else. I take it that you’re a Gnostic. Gnosticism was taken apart and disposed of in about the fourth century.
The remaining elements of your comment are irrelevant to Jung. An archetype of the human psyche is a kind of container. It’s a container that fits only one manifestation of an incomplete persona. Jung said that obsessing or relying on an archetype is classic mental illness. Even a male who obsesses on and identifies only with the Animus is not a complete personality.
Jung’s solution to the passing mental obsessions of a maturing human being is integration, the integration of all the archetypes into a unified and comfortable personality.
You’re putting too much of a burden on Jung’s body of writings. I’d suggest you read one of his latest works, “Man and the Problem of Spirit” to understand how his thinking had developed into a general view of philosophy of psyche.
OMGAWD. So Humans are supposed to allow these hebrew parasite gangsters to do WHATEVER they because Muh Mozez?
P!SS OFF.
Humans are signing off of this lunacy in droves. Run along and beat off to muh bibel in some cave somewhere.
Why do you or anyone intend to “obey” the Anti Human “jew law”?
EFF the kikes.
I’m curious, have you ever watched Dean Irebodd’s videos?
Shiiiiiiiiite!!!
Literally Hitler. Why Can’t We Talk About Him? | Candace Ep 17
Djandace Unchained, Righteous Negress goes wild.
Never heard of him.
This is emphatically not true of medicine.
Yes — but Camelot was ‘a culture’ in the same sense. Both are fantasies compiled by later generations.
…not that it matters. I’m skeptical that Jews now (or at least in recent times) have proven incapable of forming complete cultures. Jung’s notion of the cultural parasite may be relevant to the Jews he knew — I don’t see it necessarily applying to Jews elsewhere.
While it’s true that, even in principle, it is malpractice to generalize from phenomena found in upper class Viennese Jews to mankind in general, it is very doubtful that Freud was accurately describing even upper class Viennese Jews. In this regard “Seductive Mirage: An Exploration of the Work of Sigmund Freud” by Allen Esterson, “The Non-authentic Nature of Freud’s Observations” by Max Scharnberg, and “Freud Evaluated: The Completed Arc” by Malcolm Macmillan repay study. Even today, when Freud’s star has long since faded and his claims of scientific rigor are acknowledged to be nonsense, his sheer, self-interested mendacity is not generally appreciated.
Actually- the entire idea is nonsense. There is no “ethnic science” & the very notion that something has to be “practical” is ridiculous. Norwegian mathematician Sophus Lie invented Lie algebras in the 1870s & they became the cornerstone of quantum mechanics in the 1930s.
In science, exact science, people are simply working on problems. Practical application is of no consideration or importance. Scientific knowledge is the goal itself.
Barney Ronay:
“Here, by way of example, is a non-exhaustive list of German things that have felt terrifying to me, begun on my first day at the Euros when a happy German woman was laughing uncontrollably on a train passing through woodland outside Munich and I realised that happy uncontrollable German laughter is terrifying. German trains are terrifying. German railway sidings are terrifying. There are transport vibes here, fleeing energy. A German forest is terrifying, in particular a German forest clearing. An empty German park at dusk is terrifying. Any German village square is terrifying … What else? German dark wood furniture. A row of parked German bicycles (Where are they going? Will I need one?). German staircases, corridors, suitcases. Most German shoes. All discarded German shoes. ”
This is nuts.
What’s with “uncontrollable” laughter?
It’s Ronay who is not in control of his emotions and distorted imagination.
Pure projection in every sentence.
“There are transport vibes here, fleeing energy. ”
WTF?
Ronay needs a dose of Palestine to get his mind back on track and come back to the reality of the 21st century. Let him go there to get a cure for his Germany paranoia.
That is the true locus of unmeasurable trauma.
Not Germany.
It is total pandering by the Graunian to the UK’s, or NW London’s, Jewish population to let Ronay get away with filing this neurotic story and printing this slef-indulgent tripe that justifies Jews’ preference to tear at old scars and rend their garments like old women instead of learning anything from history.
What makes German dark wood furniture terrifying?
The Jews got to the Guardian a long time ago. Most of their foreign affairs staff apparently emigrated to Middle East Eye.
“Even today, when Freud’s star has long since faded and his claims of scientific rigor are acknowledged to be nonsense, his sheer, self-interested mendacity is not generally appreciated.”
Nor his truly weird domestic regime, involving the two Bernays sisters.
Plus his decision to do a 180 and ignore the evidence of “his own lyin’ eyes” when it came to the prevalence of abuse of young girls in hot-house Viennese society—in order to avoid scandalizing bourgeois society (or perhaps just bourgeois Viennese Jewish society?) with an uncomfortable truth. Thus totally betraying the trust of his patients.
Not to mention that botched, misguided, and criminally negligent project undertaken with his best friend, Wilhelm Fliess, that disfigured Emma Eckstein and ruined her life, which ended early.
How many non-Jewish patients did Freud even have?
Plus of course he was addicted to cocaine.
Freud had some interesting interests and ideas, but the bottom line is that as a medical practitioner he would now be considered a quack. His being Jewish and coming from turn-of-the-century Vienna and being persecuted by the Nazis gives him and his mainly Jewish movement a protective patina to this day.
Maybe if you add wood panelling, the room becomes hard to light?
I dunno.
Moses was “literally Hitler” literally before Hitler. Moses killed a lot of Hebroids. Moses kept the Hebrews on the straight and narrow (to the best of his abilities). Moses established the nationalist rule of law (Ten Commandments). Moses engaged in vicious antisemitism to do so. Moses led to the antisemitic prophets, who led to the antisemitic godhead Jesus Christ…
So why do the Hebroid-Golden Calfers, Hebroid-Talmudists, Hebroid-Khazars, Hebroid-Yids, Hebroid-Cousinhood, Hebroid-Marxists, Hebroid-Neocons/Neolibs/Zionists and Judeofascists and their zoglodyte stooges hate Moses — woops, I mean “Hitler” — so much?
Hitler, of course, is a symbol of Judeo-Christian Western Civilization. “Hitler” is a stand-in for Moses, the Prophets, Jesus Christ, Christendom, and Western Civilization. And soulless, stunted, doomed Satanists and Parasites can’t even stand the thought of him. He is to be banned, like the Bible and the New Testament, and never to be spoken of again by orders of Globohomo Big Brother and ZOG. Memory holed.
These soulless, stunted, vain Satanists and sociopaths hate civilization, and prefer their half-baked, quasi-Hebroid/quasi Golem brand of zoglodyte fascism.
The question is, does Vladimir Putin as well? He’s spent years drinking deeply of Hebroid toxins ingested via Marxists and the Cousinhood central bankers and the “Jewish Century” zeitgeist . He spends a lot of time grinding his axes against Moses –oops, “Hitler” — as well.
Paul Craig Roberts says he hasn’t acted decisively enough against ((Zelensky)) and ZOG and the Tower of Babel.
Could this be why? Is he a kike-sucker like all the others?
Mercy sakes, such an academicist. Academicism is a modernized formulation of priestcraft and is wrought with hyperspecialization, but as Sitzfleisch Philosoph inevitably disintegrates its own potential sense of groundedness. When one spends the majority of his time in the company of others of the same ilk; the physical dimension of spiritual fulness transmutes into a meme, an idiotology of the learned, those being devoid of common sense.
The employment of “Teutonics” to describe the Nordic folk is in the main the product of German academicism…a very elevated iteration, it must be conceded. However, the Nordic strain runs deeper than the Germanic one.
Though highest levels of craftsmanship were retained assiduously amongst the Teutonics; their cultural downfall centered on centralization and urbanization in order to accommodate their industrializing finesse. Wage-serfs, rather comfortable ones, became the meme for the majority of that national entity…that eventuality did not fully blossom until the Postwar period with their industrial “Wirtshaftswunder”.
This traditional physically imputed differentiation has largely become de-energized amongst the mostly urbanized Danes…as they recently agreed in their parliament to tax the effusions of cows.
Sweden turned to a very Germanic equivalent of mechanics and mechanism. Their industrial products, most tellingly with their Huskvarna tools,machines and weaponry, has, however, engendered urbanization of their cultural matrix.
Norwegians, late in the industrialized, centralized, urbanized game happened to hit an oil and gas “jackpot” which is fast devolving their previously land and sea centered culture. The Nouveau Riche phenomenon grips them like a vise. Think their Neo-Quisling, Jens Stoltenberg.
Ascending from facts on the ground, the material dimension, the old Shamanic ways of intercourse between humans and the natural world, was crowned with a sense of magical realism on a spiritual basis. The Futhark Runic alphabet may be viewed as a counterpoint to the aridity of the strictly non-magical and purely abstract alphabet of daily use.
Key point after this development is that the currents of Nordic consciousness…the old-school variety…preferably pre JudieChristieMagickMindfuck…even to judge by their highly artistic material creations and manifestations…that current of consciousness tends to distinguish the original Norse from the more settled and Romanized/imperialized/centralized and colonialized experience of the Germanic Volk.
So ultimately, the 19th Century Germanics dominated intellectual collegiality, combined with a growing post Romanticism German nationalism; through which those developments presented the entire Collective Western academic world with their particular viewpoint that Nordics are merely a subset of the Germanics… they viewed it inversely or precisely bass-ackwards.
From the time in the late 8th Century when the H.R. Emperor Charlegmagne destroyed the Old Saxons…the Germanic peoples were deracinated by a combination of authoritarian rulership and the introduction of an alien religion which was IMPOSED upon a once vibrant culture, originally with deep Nordic roots, where Wotan had not yet replaced the original Odin as “Allfather”.
“A second-hand anecdote relayed by a classical musician who had a (((friend))) who was part of an orchestra that toured Europe behind the legendary Hermann Baumann (note that the classical, solo horn repertoire is mostly German — Mozart, Strauss, et al.):
He said that as the concert venues approached Germany, Baumann’s playing increasingly took on a distinctly “German†charicter that disturbed him. This reached a peak in a concert in Baumann’s home town in (as I recall) Bavaria.”
IMHO this anecdote is worth zero.
First of all, Baumann was born in Berlin. But perhaps he was happy to return to Germany, where audiences are famously knowledgeable and demanding of classical musicians.
What a stupid anti-German projection conjured up by this secondhand narrator, looking for “symptoms” of supposed “German-ness.”
Second, re “the classical solo horn repertoire is mostly German,” please note that the whole classical repertoire is mostly German. Jews have excelled as musicians and conductors, but aside from Mendelsohn they did not create the repertoire.
Most of the classical music greats were born and studied in the heartland of Germany—Thuringen, Sachsen-Anhalt—and neighboring Lower Austria, and absorbed the living Central European musical culture, including the folk culture of songs and dances which were reworked into classical forms. A few came from Hamburg. To wit:
Telemann – born in Magdeburg, Sachsen-Anhalt
Bach – Eisenach, Thueringen; worked in Weimar and Leipzig, Sachsen-Anhalt; strong Bach family connections with Erfurt, the capital of Thueringen (Bach’s relatives buried there)
Haydn – Zwickau, Lower Austria
Georg Friedrich Haendel – Halle, Sachsen-Anhalt
Mozart – Salzburg, Austria (spent most of his adult musical career in Vienna)
Beethoven – Bonn, Nordrhein-Westphalia (spent most of his musical career in Vienna)
Schubert – Vienna, Austria
Schumann – Zwickau, Sachsen-Anhalt
Felix Mendelsohn – Hamburg
Brahms – Hamburg (spent most of his musical career in Vienna)
Klara Schumann – Leipzig, Sachsen-Anhalt
Richard Wagner – Leipzig, Sachsen-Anhalt
‘ identifiably home-rooted, ______ self-confidence’ is bad? Replace ‘Germanic’ with ‘black,’ ‘Italian.’ or just about any other ethnic identifier to see the absurd bigotry implicit in that statement.
The doors of the gas chambers were dark wood?
While this was Jeffrey Masson’s take on Freud, i.e. that Freud was ignoring the abuse his patients were describing to him, Esterson and Scharnberg make a persuasive case that the vast majority of these patients were nonexistent in the first place and Freud made them up to support his theory du jour. Such patients as did exist, far from spontaneously recalling scenes of abuse, were actually brow beaten by Freud until they did so. As soon as his theoretical focus changed to Oedipal complex and associated absurdities, his patients, mirabile dictu, started recalling Oedipal stories instead. In reality, of course, neither was a recollection. It was Freud extracting ‘confessions’ with mental thumbscrews.
Who doesn’t enjoy a free stream of consciousness as it wafts from a crack pipe?
Those usual awkward transitions from Jews to Bo Diddley, and to ugly Swedish
culture, were silky smooth. And, the expose’ of Ingmar Bergman as a bum
was a dramatic final surprise.
The illuminating book on Jung by Bernardo Kastrup is essential reading.
It is true that each one of us are on our very unique path. We all receive from dead and alive teachers our guidance.
All that matters is are we improving, are we ascending into the light.
It’s a pity that so many people feel they can discuss “Jewishness†without any reference to yeshivas and the teaching of the Talmud.
Did Marliyn Monroe‘s shrink rape her and then murder her ?
Jewish feminism is marked by a virulent anti male attitude. The women come by their angst, honestly. In religious Jewish culture, Jewish women must walk behind men. Also, Jew men are almost never faithful to their wives.
You’re really talking about music from 1700 to 1850 — and even then you conveniently omit composers who fit your schema (eg Bruckner) and those who don’t (Liszt). Even more seriously, you elide over greatness of late medieval and early Renaissance composers such as Josquin and Gombert) who were termed “Franco-Flemishâ€, the great Italians (from Palestrina on), not to mention….Berlioz and the French….and Tchaikovsky and the Russians…
But I completely agree that the anecdote is worthless as it is meaningless.
PS
“Curious Yellow” was by Vilgot Sjoman.
And yes, Swedes tend to be brooding and introspective.
There are worse faults.
Very good. Thank you.
In a word-are you kidding?
By 2100 ALL human types will be long gone.
But ANY, or ALL, goyim are ‘antisemitic’, through not being Jews. Goyism is ‘antisemitism’ in material, hereditary, form. When a life-long friend of Jews, and the most notable anti-racist in the UK Parliament, Corbyn, can be lynched as an ‘antisemite’, no-one is safe.
Here in Austfailia the fear of criticising the Gaza genocide lest one be immediately labeled ‘antisemitic’, is palpable in the sordid farrago of our ‘public life’. The anti-genocide forces are routinely described as ‘Jew-haters’, or merely ‘pro-Palestinian’, and it is asserted that ONLY Moslems are opposed to the genocide, while the pro-genocide groups are never interrogated regarding their support for mass child murder.
And now, the pro-genocide thugs, particularly in the ruling ALP regime, abuse the anti-genocide collective as ‘socially divisive’. Apparently genocide doesn’t count if it happens far enough away, and, crucially, if it is committed by such ‘generous’ benefactors as the Zionazis and their Jewintern accomplices. The moral and spiritual debacle, under pressure from the Jewintern and its dupes like the USA and UK, is rapidly accelerating.
Reading this article made me realise one thing: Antisemitism is absolutely necessary to keep the jewish community together. Without the fantasised threat from outside, the individual members would simply assimilate into the surrounding society and that must not happen.
As in a mafia organisation, the power of the godfathers is lost when the members decide that it is better, easier and safer to live like everyone else. And with that I also understood why the zionists decided to exterminate the whites: the western people were able to create societies with a high standard of living in which jews have had equal rights since their emancipation in the 18th century. The temptation to turn one’s back on the mumbo-jumbo of jewish dogma and become a respected member of the western community became all the greater the better this community functioned, in which everyone co-operated for the good of all.
Therefore, the zionist worldview must uphold everything that distinguishes it from the dominant western worldview and which the latter abhors: genital mutilation of infants, kosher/halal slaughter, disgusting sacrificial rites, etc.
The jewish community must be preserved so that its godparents, i.e. the spiritual leaders, can keep their instrument of power. Only through solidarity among the jewish people, who have been fed the relevant myths and legends since childhood, can the community be maintained.
These legends naturally include being chosen and fear-mongering about possible persecution. The concept is as ingenious as it is perfidious: on the one hand the deliberate provocation of their hosts, on the other the claim to being entitled and in consequence fear of backlash. Only by maintaining solidarity through fear and promises can wealthy perverts like Leo Frank live out their narcissism and be safe from prosecution. The Jewish community has been held hostage by its spiritual guardians since time immemorial, like Rapunzel by the selfish old Gothel in the animated Disney movie “Tangled†(those who watch movies with their kids will know).
However, more and more Jews are falling away from the faith and simply want to be normal citizens in a functioning community. This functioning community was built by Whites and in order to eliminate this temptation, the functioning community is being smashed and those who created it are being hunted down.
It’s as simple as that.
I said “the whole *classical* repertoire,” dummy.
I did not provide an overview of Western music history.
However, since the horn was mentioned, this nudges me to explore where the greatest technical advances in the production of musical instruments were made in the 19th c.
I think the Italians excelled in the string instruments, but who excelled in the concert piano? in the woodwinds and brass?
No time right now to do it, though.
Christianity was an invention of the Jews, that is a fact.
https://odysee.com/@KnowMoreNews:1/Judeo-Conspiracy-Mix-2:2
Largely is not a synonym for always.
From a broad view we perceive patterns. When one examines the bark of trees one gains nothing toward finding his way out of the forest. Your approach to these issues of history seems a wild goose chase away from understanding what is. I consider it sophistry, continually meandering away from recognized reality to confuse and even, dare I say, dissemble and obfuscate. That’s not a good look.
Enough with the kibitzing.
The women are sluts, the men are pansies, and the entire population is mentally ill, with chronic psychosis with brief periods of clarity and Reality perception. The epicenter of the “hollow personality” of a very high percentage of ScramDeludedOnes.
“mirabile dictu,”
((:-))
One of my mother’s favorite expressions.
She was German . . . but few knew it; her English was akzentfrei. But she would throw in Latin phrases every now and again—another was mutatis mutandis—eliciting quizzical looks . . .
“chosen” . . . yes, but chosen for what?
It sounds like you might be an incel reject of a beautiful
Swedish woman.
My most sincere condolences to you, and keep
on huffing and pouping along!
That is an awesome interview…thanks for posting!
I’m not surprised. You should give his videos a look. That is, if you’re willing to be presented with actual evidence.
https://archive.org/search?query=creator%3A%22Dean%20Irebodd%22
Did she come here as a child or learn English as a child? It’s most unusual for adult speakers of German to pick up entirely unaccented English.
What God would choose one people over all others considering all peoples are that same Gods’ creation?
Still, I think it’s inarguable that Germany takes first in the production of great music. It also wins in philosophy, and history — the Germans practically invented history as a serious academic discipline.
Other arts and academic disciplines are more scattered…but I think we can concede painting to the French, and I’d hand the prize for the novel to Russia.
All Aryans are White but not all Whites are Aryans. Polish are Aryans but the Germs are not, even both are White.
“It’s most unusual for adult speakers of German to pick up entirely unaccented English. ”
It is.
But “pick up” is not IMO the operative notion when it comes to learning a foreign language, including the accent, particularly as a adult.
Some people have a good ear and are good at imitating. It’s genetic, I think, but also requires motivation.
My mother studied English (and French and Latin) at her Lyzeum in Berlin. At the age of 17, after Hitler’s Machtergreifung, she was sent to England to finish her schooling. Until 1937 she divided her time between Britain and Berlin .
In 1937 she was able to get to the US. She might have had more of an accent when she first arrived here, but she had NO German accent whatsoever when I knew her ((:-)). She never took on the US accent.
She read a great deal, also read to us out loud after dinner, such as Bulfinch’s Age of Fable. The Oxford dictionary sat on the bookshelf next to the dinner table and was often consulted. This ideal of continually improving one’s linguistic abilities is more typically European than American, I think.
My father never learned any German and it was not spoken at home.
I learned German after college, many decades ago, when I found myself living in Germany.
I was very motivated and applied myself (took intensive courses) to learn the grammar and all the irregular verbs, noun inflections, etc. I tried to imitate typical speech mannerisms, voice tone people used, facial expressions, etc. Kind of like acting, or pretending. And when you are in the country there is the constant exposure and repetition for five years. I expect it was similar for my mother when she was spending most of the year in England.
On a recent visit to Germany I was told that I have virtually no accent (even though I have no one to converse with here, and my vocab is very reduced).
“Germany takes first in the production of great music.”
In the “Germany” of the 18th and 19th C (“Germany” didn’t really exist but there was a large region comprising many small German-speaking political entities), what enabled many of the musical greats to become great was the existence of myriad patrons–primarily major and minor aristocrats and monarchs, and religious organizations—who commissioned works, hired court musicians, and paid people like Haydn not only to compose choral works and chamber music for the patrons and their friends to play but also to teach the children of the household how to play musical instruments so that *they* would acquire musical literacy and be able to appreciate and enjoy playing the masters’ compositions.
AFAIK none of these patrons were Jewish.
Correct me if I am wrong.
Frinstance I don’t think the Rothschilds took any interest in supporting any talented composers.
.
Very interesting and I think pretty unusual. More typical I think are speakers who think they don’t have an accent but really do. I remember when my father was once in hospital in the early 70s he was attended by a nurse with a heavy German accent. My dad who born in Germany and was a native German speaker made some quip to her in German and she drew herself up to her full height of ‘5 “1 and said frostily ” Vat makes you sink I’m Cherman?”
What is an example (or examples, if you are feeling generous) of a “typical speech mannerism�
“They violently attacked everything about German society. They despised the military, the judiciary, and the middle class in generalâ€
You don’t need to be a Jew to despise pre WW2 german military , judiciary and even the then and current f…g german middle class
Can’t understand that fascination for so called german cuture here on unz review . You americans know nothing .
The german military was famous for its culture of violence against civilians . Just ask the french civilians in 1871,1914-18, and 1940 . And I’m not talking about the russians …The german army had left such a souvenir of good behaviour in occupied northern France in 14-18 that when they invaded in 1940 the people fled in horror . Response of the german command was to shoot the fleeing refugees on french roads by german planes, flown by pilots full of the ” german military sense of honor ..”
Adolf did not a good enough job of decapitating the german high command in 1944 , too many of these prussian sons of b…ches managed to escape .
As for the Weimar ” decay” , it’s pretty obvious that a number of german people were fed up with the utter rigidity and sheer stupidity of imperial germany and that it was time for a happy change , Jew or not .
Pretentious much?
Great reply, but Solzhenitsyn’s work was 200 (not two thousand) years together. He was referring specifically to the period following the fateful annexation by Russia of the greater part of Poland (the so-called “partitions” in which both Prussia and Austria-Hungary gleefully participated 1771-1795), crammed (relatively speaking) with Jews who were addicted to tax farming on behalf of the aristocrats, monopolizing the liquor trade to keep the serfs inebriated, and running their typical usurious and swindling practices so as to gather in all the hard coin.
As the Viennese Karl Kraus (1874-1936) once noted: “psychoanalysis is the disease that it believes to cureâ€.
It sounds like you are a slave to one, or cannot do better. To me, the great majority are like beer cans, plastic and tin foil: they are disposable, single use, and have no interesting personalities. Unless they are renegades and reject the life long indoctrination and destruction of their Self (Jung) and the creation of the iron face mask or the Swedish Persona (Jung).
Too much real sadness and horror in the world. Piles of 90 year old shoes supposedly from victims of Nazis are fake and gay.
Probably even more, especially counting hybrids. But they don’t like to be counted nowadays.
Hungary used to be over 10% Jewish, between the two wars. Budapest much higher than that. Were the majority in some districts.
Time for you to expand your limited knowledge of western music. Your local library may be able to get some volumes of the Taruskin history. Or, if you don’t play an instrument, perhaps learn to read music. There are many used electronic keyboards in the aftermarket available cheaply.
And why choose a people rather than specific individuals? After all, a people is likely to have some saints, some sinners, and a lot of people in between, while if one chooses specific individuals, one can simply choose the saints.
Impeccable.
Thank you.
I complimented your post and you label me pretentious.
Strange.
Counter-transference much?
Very interesting essay. Thanks.
My senior year in high school I got caught up in leftism, and since leftism is infused with criticizing society, I became a critic of society. The idea, as it was explained to me, was that by being critical, one could uncover societal problems that were otherwise swept under the rug. It was many years before I realized that there is a massive contradiction here: that one who is critical ought to be self-critical as well. After all, there is no guarantee that those who are critical won’t have problems, and in fact they have many.
Just take a look at the disarray among the Democrats right now. Had they been self-critical, they wouldn’t be in this mess. They would not have allowed Biden to run again, or they wouldn’t have chosen him back in 2020. In fact, the Dems have lost a bunch of elections starting in 1968 when they began losing poor whites. An attempt to win them back at that time would have saved them from a lot of Republican presidents. In 2012 I had an Internet discussion with leftists, trying to get them to do this, but they were arrogant and thought that their coalition was going to dominate politics forever. Then came 2016.
Another problem is that critics of society can never issue apologies and are always pointing the finger of blame at someone else. This, of course, is very annoying, to say the least.
But more generally, the critic of society will point to a problem and demand that it be solved, while the person who is also self-critical (of oneself and one’s movement) will ask if the problem needs to be solved at all. Maybe the costs will be higher than the benefits, or maybe that will be true of the proposed solution. As Thomas Sowell says, there aren’t solutions, only trade-offs.
I’m sure everyone here agrees that the problem of the trannies is a problem that doesn’t need to be solved. Ditto for the problem of police violence against blacks, and many other issues.
If only I had figured out the value of being self-critical earlier in life.
Do you mean music or “the art of noise�
No offence meant. Wherever I live, there’s a classical music station on in the background, usually weta.org in Washington. It brings my blood pressure down and (unfortunately not always) provides listening pleasure like otherwise only birdsong in the garden or mountain hikes. In turbulent times, listening to Italian operas from the Risorgimento period proves its worth: great emotions and the singers shouting their hearts out. If you need consolation, the symphonies of Brahms, conducted by Sergiu Celibidache, can help. If you need spiritual support, turn to Thomas Tallis or Palestrina. I do not recommend the ambitious recording of all Bach cantatas by Sir John Eliot Gardiner (under the label “soli deo gloriaâ€), because Gardiner is excellent with Purcell, but the spirit of Bach remains alien to him.
https://www.counterpunch.org/2003/02/01/symbol-and-synchronicity-in-the-crash-of-the-columbia/
According to the French. The French were actually somewhat worse in this respect — and indeed, in 1940, the French themselves were startled by the punctilious correctness of the behavior of German military personnel.
Arguing about the bestiality sweepstakes could go on forever, but in general, if the Germans weren’t always the best, they weren’t necessarily the worst either.
Even in a nightmare like Yugoslavia… Milovan Djilas, the former partisan and later dissident, compared the Germans favorably to the Italians. The Germans were predictable. If a German patrol showed up, and someone had knifed a sentry last night, it would be a good idea to hide. On the other hand, if everyone had been good, maybe a pig would get ‘requisitioned’ — but there was no need to freak out.
Djilas reserved his wrath for the Italians. One day it would kissing babies and talking about how awful war was. The next it would be killing all the women and seizing all the men and raping all the animals. You couldn’t count on them. There was no clear correspondence between your behavior and their response.
…and to meander off the subject, it’s noteworthy that the Italians don’t seem to have been very successful colonizers. Libya was a mess, and Ethiopia was headed the same way. They didn’t seem to be able to command either the respect or the fear of their subjects.
Ya’ think?
Bach means Karl Richter for me.
A good point.
I’ve been circumcised. I’m 65, and raised evangelical protestant. I find Jews to be fascinating, but lately, more and more repulsed by their extraordinary high in-group preferences. I find little if any of the characteristics you describe in your comment in myself. How so? In isolation, circumcision seems to be of little effect. To what do you ascribe these effects, then?
The man that designed the guidance systems for Mercury and Gemini, was Ernest J Plata, a Seventh-day Adventist from Venezuela that I worked for at the National Cancer Institute (he got tired of being transferred to ICBMs after the space program was over and decided to go into a life science and picked the field and school that gave him the biggest stipend). He never mentioned any particular ethnicity involved in the projects except for the fact that most of the (computer) programmers were black women (see movie Hidden Figures), something I found quite surprising in 1979.
You have hit the nail on the head! Organized Jewry’s greatest fear is not eradication by conquest, but by assimilation. To Kevin MacDonald and those that agree with him, I will say that the way to beat Jewish Supremacism is not to become like it (Nazism), but to become as much UNlike it as possible (radical individualism) and seduce them away from their psychopathy. “Love your enemies, do good to those that hate you . . .”
‘ … most of the (computer) programmers were black women … ‘
I knew a ‘computer programmer’ nearly sixty years ago. Everyone was very impressed until they learned that he was just a punchcard operator, he didn’t write programmes for computers.
Kevin MacDonald’s diagnosis of the Jewish problem is that it is cultural. Despite the fact that MacDonald refers to a “group evolutionary strategy,” his writings do not detail any biological evolutionary process that culminated in the Jewish behavior that has so negatively impacted the West (and Palestine) since 1900. MacDonald writes about intra-ethnic cultural arrangements and inter-ethnic cultural strategies that characterize Jewish history. In short, he writes about a form of tribalism that is appropriate for a parasitic minority population. Other examples are Roma, Irish Travelers, organized criminal syndicates, etc. Like every other ethnic group throughout history, when Jews had their own country, their tribalism was expressed as military aggression, to which they returned via Zionism.
If simple tribalism were the entire social armamentarium of the European Jews, then seducing them into assimilation would be feasible. However, the Jewish armory includes all of the sociopath’s weapons: lack of empathy, Machiavellianism, supremacist mindset. As several people have argued on UR, and as MacDonald has studiously avoided commenting upon, widespread sociopathy was likely evolved as an adaptation promoting individual reproductive success during the historical period when European Jewish reproductive success was dependent on extracting monies from the host population of Eastern Europeans, especially the peasantry.
Given the innate sociopathy of many Jews, your proposed strategy of assimilating them can never work because the ones who will assimilate are likely to be the least sociopathic, and the hard-core sociopaths will not assimilate because intra-ethnic networking is what allows them to express their inner essence, which is to dominate.
J.S. Bach was forgotten for a while, only rediscovered and (due to the zeitgeist) misunderstood during the Romantic period. Romanticism was imbued with the ideals of the French Revolution, which were completely alien to the maestro. In the Baroque era, the divine = natural order was still considered immovable and universally valid, and to act against it bordered on sacrilege. This is why Bach’s work appears cold, mechanical and predictable to many, and Karl Richter also had to put up with the accusation that his playing was as expressive as the rattling of a sewing machine. I see it differently, because after the terrible rage of the Thirty Years’ War, people longed for order, security and reliability, just as Karl Richter did after the horror of the Second World War. Subliminally, Bach’s compositions and Richter’s interpretation pulsate with passion and lifeblood, tamed by discipline
jews as a people, are such pathologically hypocritical cowards. They endlessly dish out criticism of non jews, but the moment a non jew “talks back”, the jews screech “anti semitism” and demand their opponents be censured and silenced.
They act like frigging women. They can dish it out, but they can’t take it.
Samuels the jew criticizing Jung says:
Unbelievable. Let’s do a little deconstructing here.
Samuels whining about Jung acknowledging human and national difference? WTF? That is precisely what judaism is all about. It says that jews are “chosen by god”, and “different”, and thus the jews should remain separate and not intermarry with “lowly” non jews. There are many verses in the OT attesting to this. Ask the majority of jews themselves, and they will insist jews are more intelligent, more sensitive (lol, ask the little Palestinian girl that had her jaw blown off by the jews this week about that claim), and more moral (see jews demanding an ethnostate for israel, but replacement level immigration for Europe and the Anglosphere – some “morality” there, jews). Jews clearly see themselves as different than non jews. They even fabricated an ethnic cult that has a central theme of differences between jews and non jews. Samuels is a hypocritical pos.
Samuels cries about Jung feeling threatened by jews? Again, WTF? Jews are constantly crying about how “threatened” they are by non jews. Pro Palestinian advocates at UCLA protest against jews wiping out Palestinians in Gaza? Jews = “we feel so threatened. We are so terrified. We cannot even walk on campus without people saying things we don’t like. It’s annudda shoah, oye vey!” Pro White advocates dare to advocate for their ethnic racial interests? Jews= “we feel so threatened. Every time White people have ever done things in their interest, we jews end up suffering. So Whites should NEVER be permitted to advocate for themselves, or jews might be poisecuted!” The other jew in this very story was “threatened” by everything from German laughter, German bicycles, parks, and presumably, smiling German infants. Jews are constantly whining about being “threatened”. Again, Samuels is a hypocritical pos.
jews know that when their ever present double standards are allowed to be openly analyzed and critiqued (as I have here), that their bs will be exposed for the blatant hypocrisies they hold. That is why they endlessly whine about anti semitism and demand any criticism of them, israel, or their power be “shut down”.
But do it. It’s high time jews, jewish power, israel, and judaism be deconstructed. Let them cry about it all they want…I couldn’t care less about their hypocritical complaints.
What? Where do you think marx, the world destroyer came from? He came from a friggin rabbi. Countless of these world destroyers that pushed feminism, abortion, communism, anti White hate, open borders for the west (but not for israel of course) came from very religious families.
No, hasidim are just as much of a threat as other jews…frequently, they are even more of a threat than the secular jews, because religious jews are frequently religious fanatics that think their made up messiah won’t come until White gentiles are wiped off the face of the earth for eternity. These hasidim have hordes of children some of which eventually become secular, and then they push the open borders, anti White hate, etc. So whether they stay hasids, or become secular in later generations, it doesn’t matter:
1. If they stay hasids, they believe White people must be wiped out so that their “messiah” can come.
2. If their offspring become secular, the offspring believe White gentiles must be turned into a minority, otherwise the jews “won’t be safe.”
Either way, with the jews, we lose.
All jews are a threat to their hosts. They have their own country now. They should all move there instead of trying to subvert our nations for their racial/ethnic interests.
ROFL. No ease? No rest?
Just look at the jews that rule over us: the larry finks, the adelson’s, the zuckerbergs, and countless others. While the majority of goys slave away, pinching pennies to make it, the tribe is doing quite well in the west. Ethnic ranking by per capita income in the US:
1. indians
2. jews
3. east asians
4. White gentiles
5. hispanics
6. blacks
So, uh, no. jews aren’t persecuted and powerless in the diaspora of Europe and the Anglosphere.
The key to so called “anti semitism” everywhere and always has been this:
jews are loyal to their own tribe ABOVE being loyal to their hosts. Eventually and always, there will be a topic or policy where the interests of jews is the polar opposite of the interests of their hosts. When this happens, their hosts turn on the jews and demand the jews accept what is best for the masses (the hosts). The jews inevitably refuse and push a jews first agenda, then their hosts say “fk these people….kick them out of our country.”
SOOOOO
Counter semitism has throughout history, always been a result of jewish BEHAVIOR. That is the problem….they are loyal to themselves and not their host people and their hosts best interests. Imagine if in israel, a bunch of ultra ethnocentric Chinese constantly demanded what is best for the ethnic Chinese in israel, regardless of how it harmed the jews in israel. How would the jews respond? The way the jews WOULD respond is exactly how the White gentiles have responded…they have insisted their genetic interests be respected.
This has ALWAYS been the problem and why jews have been expelled from so many places. They (as a people) are loyal to themselves, and not to their host nation/people. Jews always think first and foremost “is it good for the jews”.
Over 100,000 Jews fought in the nazi army. Hitler was right. His “racial purity laws” were nothing about “racial purity”. They were simply about expelling and isolating those jews most likely to be disloyal. So, if you are 100% ethnically jewish, you are more likely to be of the anti German “we do what’s good for the jews” type of jew that will stab the Germans in the back as long as “it’s good for the jews.” Just like the jews in the US that support AIPAC and aggression against Russia. This may be “good for the jews”, but it’s not good for the whites, blacks, hispanics, or muslims in the US. But jews don’t give a damn if 50 million Americans die for jewish interests in israel. They prefer that to one single jew dying for israel’s interests. IT IS THIS TRIBAL DUPLICITY THAT PISSES OF THEIR HOSTS, EVERY. FUCKING. TIME.
Hitler wisely saw this and did exactly what in group preference and sociobiology would predict: expel those likely to be disloyal to the German people.
For example, let’s say blacks and whites were at war with one another. Let’s say there are some individuals that are mixed, white and black in different proportions. Would someone 100% black be likely to be loyal to white people? Hell no. But, would someone that is 50% white and 50% black be more likely to be loyal to white people? Yeah, probably. How about someone 75% white and 25% black. In this case, all things being held equal, that person is more likely to be loyal to whites than to blacks.
THIS is what Hitler and the Nazis were doing. They were trying to estimate which groups of Jews were more likely to be loyal to the native Germans.
The fact that over 100,000 Jews fought for the Nazi army proves that what the Allies and Zionists say about Hitler and the Nazis is just sheer propaganda and deceit.
Jews really need to live only among themselves in their own nation. They will only cause grief and conflict in any society they gain power in (due to their backstabbing, and group selfishness).
We non jews don’t demand to live in israel, and then demand that jews in israel accept an agenda that is what’s “good for the goyim”. Jews should do the same for us. They shouldn’t demand to live among us, and then demand we always do what’s “good for the jews” regardless of how negatively that impacts us and our descendants.
The Jews are the only group that, when you delve deeper, you actually find less to admire. Whether it’s their “holy†books (religion), their attitudes towards others (Talmud), their visual arts (which becomes distinctive only in the twentieth century with the Expressionist movement and nightmarish painters like Chaim Soutine), their music (klezmer), all of it is of a lower order from the achievements of civilized cultures — a result of its founding in the bestial and the materialist (Jewish Bible) rather than the spiritual.
How dare you say amazingly beautiful art from jews like Chaim Soutine is not appealing! The anti semitism is just shocking. Shocking I say. Just look at this gem revealing the amazing talent and genius of chaim:
https://www.sothebys.com/en/slideshows/the-captivating-expressionism-of-chaim-soutine?slide=chaim-soutine-portrait-de-jeune-fille-paulette-jourdain-circa-1928-estimate-400-000-600-000-to-be-offered-in-sothebys-impressionist-modern-art-day-sale-on-17-may-in-new-york
Compare that to these ugly, ugly images from untalented, and unchosen European goys like these guys:
Or this:
https://www.fineartandyou.com/2013/12/john-william-waterhouse-british.html
These talentless White goyim are truly a plague on the earth. The day they are replaced by infinity africans, and the chosen jews will be the day paradise and true beauty in art and in all things can begin.
LOL.
/sarcasm off
The Romans crucified Jesus. It was the traditional method for enemies of the State .
There is no individual solution to a collective problem. The whole point of fascism (originally) was for non-communists to band together against the communist powerlust. Of course, psychopathic politicians quickly realized a way to gain power over the masses using this system, at which point it became simply another flavor of the totalitarianism the true opponents of Marxism were seeking to avoid.
The way to beat Jewish Supremacism is to NAME IT. The Jews will continue to plague Western Civilization until such time as the true Westerners – that is, European (WHITE) peoples – are willing to stand up and say, “Fuck you. CALL me an ‘antisemite.’ That’s not an argument any debate, logic or philosophy class would recognize as valid. And it’s 100% pure projection. You Jews have been racists and supremacists going back over 3,000 years. We don’t give a fuck what you think or say about US.”
The ‘sleeping giant’ is awake; he’s aware, and pissed off. Now? He just has to grow a freaking SPINE. And people like the regulars at this site are going to HAVE to be the ones who act as a catalyst, to make that happen.
Exactly. It’s high time the critics were criticized, as openly and unsympathetically as they’ve criticized us filthy goyim all these many millennia.
https://a.co/d/aEH24PI
Hitler From Choirboy to Antichrist Part I.
By the age of thirty-two, Adolf Hitler had become a local party boss with a monstrous agenda. All that remained was to carry it out.
This is the definitive story of the first half of his life, a dramatic mosaic of documented fact with verbatim dialogue, that will astonish even the most well informed on the subject.
Like history, Hitler had a reputation for repeating himself. In his case, at least, it was well deserved. Many of the remarks recorded in later years had been part of his repertoire since his youth. Returning these to their original context makes it possible to portray his development with unsurpassed clarity and virtually stenographic accuracy.
What I meant was, the way people “act” many expressions typical of their language and attitude, and their mentality. Their body language and also facial “body language.” Also the tone and rhythm—what you can’t really get from a dicitonary, but could get from language videos, or movies,—or being in the country, or also, if one hangs out with a few good friends, one tends to adopt their mannerisms, their favorite expressions, and how they say them.
It is funny that when one is trying to learn to speak without an accent it is like there is something missing that one is trying to acquire—the foreign accent.
One isn’t aware of speaking “with an accent” when one speaks one’s native language, although of course one is doing so.
And when one is listening to a non-native speaker speak one’s language with an accent, it feels as though they have added something on top of one’s language, or have failed to eliminate something. Not as though they have failed to acquire a new accent. I do think that with motivation and training if necessary one can get rid of/acquire “foreign” accents—however one interprets the process. Learn how to form the needed sounds. For instance, opera singers have to train to learn parts in many languages and render them pretty accent-free. Most people are not that motivated or don’t have access to training. Actors also have to learn accents, for instance, an American accent if they are to play an American character in a movie.
In my mother’s case she lived in an English-speaking world her whole adult life—actually had her own radio program —and eventually her spoken/heard German became halting through disuse, despite her attempts to keep her language(s) alive with reading. I wanted to speak German with her but (when she got older) if I just started out without letting her know I was speaking German, she would first try to understand it as English and say, What are you talking about???
From your short quote of this Jew’s analysis: “…Jung too would feel threatened by the Jews…” and again, “Jung, too, would feel threatened by the Jews…” and, “…What threatens Jung, in particular…”.
The perpetual hand-wringers crying oy vey reflexively is hilarious while infuriating. Their consistent behavior is instructive to me. They live in constant fear and cannot imagine any emotion, position, or conclusion not tied to it. That results in an “American” culture, for instance, entwined in a matrix of יהודי paranoia. All of the goy lie on their couches of psychoanalysis and we all somehow have phobias. The masters of projection are pretty transparent, and we should at least enjoy some schadenfreude. The worn out diagnosis of all the Freudsters is pathetic, of course, but we can enjoy their inferior, obtuse pronouncements while savoring their inner stress.
Obviously, their singular motivation is potent and keeps them on target. That’ something we don’t have. It remains for us to get good and fed up, as always. This time it may be too late to salvage much, so let’s at least take the opportunity to laugh at our enemies’ weak, projected hypocrisy and hystericalism
I fail to see how this relates to what I actually posted.
Sounds good — but that more or less describes our response to the arrival of the Jews in America.
The Jews went to town. Look at where we are now.
I’m not convinced of that. From about 1500 to about 1800, Jews were largely irrelevant in the West. They were there; they were just so completely marginalized that their impact was nil. I’m also not convinced they had a particularly deleterious effect in the Islamic world — but there I would be speaking from ignorance.
So apparently Jews can be isolated, and prevented from having the sort of devastating impact they’ve had here over the last seventy years or so, and particularly in the last four.
But still….the jews are filthy Rat-People.
They always were and always will be, until something is finally done about their pernicious presence on this dying planet.
Make all the excuses you wish to.
The fact that they are Satanic parasites without a human conscience will always remain self evident.
That’s because you look at things differently than I and some others. It also happens to be the essence of my response to you, and it is no surprise that you miss the relevance. We are coming at this from a different perspective.
The fruitful application of intelligent thought presents as discernment of significant patterns. The process of recognizing patterns requires assessing quantities of data, and noting the patterns while discarding the exceptions and outliers that confuse the imperceptive. Note that the objective is to acquire the patterns — and attendant to that there is a consequent rejection of the outliers and exceptions that contradict the apparent and consistent patterns.
What you have demonstrated repeatedly is a practice of regurgitating remembered narratives that you think are invalidating the overwhelmingly demonstrated patterns. See? It’s relevant. You have a habit of operating the process of intelligent thought, backwards. You inanely refute real patterns with your anecdotes of exception.
Parroting even vast quantities of narrative that has captured one’s interest is merely a wild goose chase into confusion. The essence of understanding is recognition of patterns. Your behavior that I commented on may not be your only behavior. It’s just the one I noticed, and it impacts the discourse on this important subject in a way that is helpful to my enemy. That makes it a deal, if not a big deal. But I have good friends who do exactly what I note in your posts, and I know that I will not change their ability to think nor yours. I noted it for the benefit of others, and to make sure it is clear what you are doing, be it wittingly or unwittingly.
Since you aren’t citing any cases, it’s impossible to refute you — but I feel it’s just the opposite. I perceive the real patterns and demonstrate their existence.
…also, since my reasoning is ‘inane,’ yours is homosexual.
Well, I wouldn’t go that far.
I prefer to see it as a matter of Doctor Zhivago’s brother’s observation upon seeing Zhivago furtively stealing fencing: ‘one man stealing wood for his fireplace is pathetic; a million can destroy a city.’
Jews have demonstrable proclivities and attitudes. If these were confined to just a few individuals, or even if Jews weren’t so energetic at putting their preferences into practice, it would all be harmless enough — perhaps even praiseworthy. After all, I don’t particularly want to be ossified in the Mormon Tabernacle Choir for all eternity either. A bit of the old Judenkeit isn’t necessarily a bad thing.
It’s just that practiced to the extent it is, when it’s put into play as a global paradigm, the consequences are catastrophic.
…as we are seeing.
So I move from that to thinking about how we can confine Jewish influence once and for all (or at least for a few centuries) — and in as humane a manner as feasible.
I don’t think of them as ‘rat people.’ In fact, up until about five years ago, I would have unhesitatingly chosen a random Jew over a random gentile as someone to be stuck on a desert island with. They’re alright — taken one at a time.
Psychology as a science, early on, was known as the Jew science. Jung made it mainstream. They needed him. I went to college in the ’90s and attained a degree in psychology and returned in 2020 to get my masters. I would definitely say it is a Jew science, critical race theory etc. all sprouted from this jew science. They are repeating history. 6 million Jews may or may have not died during world war II. Over 50 million Christians did die, but we never talk about that.
The Jews plated a major part in helping US create A bomb. In typical Benedict Arnold traitor turncoat as they’re known for, they helped our alleged enemy the Soviet Union create the A bomb. Then it became the Rosenberg trial, but who knows who else assisted in creating the USSR bomb?
Henry VIII used Talmudic rabbis to assist him in his altercations with Rome over the divorce of Catherine of Aragon. Henry was so appreciative of their assistance he required his sons to learn Hebrew. Henry is also believed to have initiated the circumcision of male infant progeny, a practice which is (apparently) continues to today.
In short, I suspect you have not done any serious research to base your sweeping generalizations.
Christians are cattle and deaths are unworthy of being acknowledged/sarc
Moreover, the reality is that the Jew dominates, in an increasingly clear fashion, the promotion of “standards†of beauty and culture in the west today. From the largest art auction houses to the major Internet pornography sites (Pornhub and For Fans Only) all is in control of the Jews — and in latter case, both are owned [separately] by Talmudic rabbis.
As I’ve remarked before, the more deeply one enters into the history of the Jews, the more repellant they emerge.
Those were DIFFERENT Jewish individuals, you fool. Jews are not some sort of ‘Borg’ group organism.
I once saw a rabbi damning the USA as the ‘United States of Amalek’. The reason? The loss of ‘precious Jewish souls’ through out-marriage.
jesus was a zionist ethnic supremacist zealot. However, the jewish priests later changed parts of the story to make it seem like jesus was a nice peaceful dude in order to appeal to the naive goyim.
Video Link
I’ve collected antiques for years now. I go to a worldwide auction website on the regular. Whenever I see a painting that is hideous and clearly done by someone without artistic skill or talent, when I look up the artist, 90+ % of the time they are jews.
Adding ugliness to Europe for 2,000+ years. I wish this plague would forever leave our lands and move to africa or asia forever. They clearly hate us (White gentiles), so why do they demand to live among us?
An analogy of the jews would be an ethnic chinese person that hates black people demanding to live among blacks in subsaharan africa. It simply makes no sense.
Why do they choose to live among gentiles? Apart from the predatory motivations, the Jew is so disconnected from beauty in his tribal life, that to live among beautiful things (above all, humans) provides joy — but, as always with the Jew, envy and hate. Sadly, there is no possibility the Jew will exit the west. People don’t generally abandon palatial homes that they own. I’m afraid it’s too late.
Many surmise that they intend to move on to China (there were many Jews, no surprise, in China in between the two world wars, as ever alert to the possibility of shekels) — but I suspect that the leadership is too savvy to allow that to happen. The western banks in China, for example, have trading operations that are limited and heavily scrutinized, so it’s impossible that the Jews could crash the securities and currency exchanges. After all one of the marks of the Jew has always been usury and the concomitant arbitrage that entails.
Of all the civilizational endeavors, the Jews are weakest in the visual arts. For a laught, take a look at this list of the 15 “most influential Jewish paintersâ€:
https://www.discoverwalks.com/blog/world/15-most-influential-jewish-painters/
FEBRUARY 1, 2003
Symbol and Synchronicity in the Crash of the Columbia
BY JERRY KROTHFacebookTwitterRedditEmail
The loss of the Columbia space shuttle is suffused with symbols begging for attention. Columbia is named, in part, after Christopher Columbus and symbolically points to the very discovery of the American nation. Strangely, on the threshold of America’s preemptive invasion of Iraq to eliminate its weapons of mass destruction, the shuttle’s hold contained the first Israeli astronaut who in 1981 himself participated in a preemptive attack on an Iraqi nuclear reactor to eliminate its capacity for developing weapons of mass destruction. An uncanny echo, but certainly not the only one.
As we are on the precipice of a war with Iraq, the whole Arab world screams that it is not Iraq but America’s relationship with Israel and the Palestinian crisis that is the root cause of all Arab anti-American sentiment and certainly all terrorism. Suddenly the Columbia crashes with an Israeli astronaut over George Bush’s home state as debris rains down on “Palestine, Texas.†One cannot help but hear these mysterious reverberations.
Similarly, just as the very essence of Israel is intimately connected to the holocaust as a place of refuge against the worst evil ever perpetrated by man against man, so we cannot help but notice another coincidence: Israel’s astronaut was the son of a holocaust survivor.
These synchronicities drape themselves over the landscape of our sadness, almost overshadowing the advent of the America’s next major war. But perhaps the word is not overshadow but foreshadow, and the meaning of the Columbia disaster—if we are to hazard a guess about these coincidences—is that it is the American relationship with Israel that is leading toward disaster. Certainly many in the Islamic world will see this as a preternatural sign that America’s connection to Israel will result in its annihilation.
On the other hand, if our focus is on Israel, then the meaning might be that it is Israel’s relationship with America which is leading it toward disaster, not the other way round, and here we have a more immediate meaning since an invasion of Iraq will more likely result in retaliation upon Israel than upon the U.S. mainland.
Psychiatrist Carl Jung’s teachings about synchronicities-as-oracles might echo similar sentiments. The fact that all this happened on the first day of the Chinese New Year—a terrible omen in ancient China—adds another element of foreboding. Let us hope such things are egregious speculations and that there is no symbolic significance here, merely meaningless coincidences, a few loose tiles, a painful accident, and the loss of very dear people whose parent’s grief galvanizes a nation’s remorse.
JERRY KROTH, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of Counseling Psychology at Santa Clara University. He can be reached at: [email�protected]