');
The Unz Review •�An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
BlogviewAndrew Anglin Archive
The Drone Hoax Continues

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library •�B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search TextCase SensitiveExact WordsInclude Comments
List of Bookmarks

Previously:

It’s still not clear what the purpose of the drone hoax is, actually.

Chuck Schumer has to go out and say he’s against it, but as we’ve said repeatedly, there is simply no way that the government doesn’t know what these drones are.

AP:

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer was blocked Wednesday from quickly advancing a bill that would allow local law enforcement agencies to track aerial drones, ensuring Congress won’t act this year on the mysterious drone sightings that have bewildered residents of New Jersey and across the eastern U.S.

Schumer, a New York Democrat, sought to speed a bipartisan bill through the Senate by seeking unanimous consent on the floor, but Sen. Rand Paul, a Kentucky Republican, objected to its passage.

“The people in New York and New Jersey have a lot of questions, and they’re not getting good enough answers,” said Schumer. “The utter confusion surrounding these drone sightings shows that the feds can’t respond all on their own.”

Schumer has also called for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to deploy better drone-tracking technology to identify the drones and their operators.

The Senate bill would have also enhanced some federal agencies’ authority to act on drones, as well as started a pilot program to allow states and local authorities to disrupt, disable or seize a drone without prior consent of the operator.

The claim these drones are looking for some kind of stolen nuclear bomb or something has gained traction in recent days, particularly after it was promoted by Joe Rogan, but that only makes sense if you’re not willing to suppose that the US government would just fuck with people on purpose.

Schumer’s thing is probably about taking away people’s drone rights, and done in a way to make it look to the people of New York like he’s trying to stop the drone swarm.

Video Link

Frankly, it doesn’t really seem like people care very much about this drone hoax. The media and various government officials are acting like people care about it, but I’ve not seen one normal person saying “SOMEONE HAS TO STOP THESE DRONES.”

Most people understand that they are drones, not some secret technology, they understand that the only people who could be doing it are in the US government, and it’s just difficult to get overly upset over that.

I saw Dan Bongino on stream trying to say these were from “a foreign adversary” and he asked the chat and the chat flipped out and said they were from the US government, at which point he backed off the claim.

Remember that with the China “spy balloon” hoax, China was demanding that the US bring down the balloon and open it up and provide evidence for their claims it was a “spy balloon.” Instead of doing that, Joe Biden let it float all the way across the country, then used a very expensive missile to destroy it over the ocean so no one could ever know what it was.

That was a total hoax, and it is disgusting that Tucker Carlson promoted it.

But that is what people are using to support the claim that the US government would allow China/Russia/Iran drones to swarm over New Jersey for literally no reason. There is no way they would allow that, and they would use it as a reason to attack any of these countries – all of which the Biden Administration has already declared some form of war against.

As Jeffrey Sachs said in his most recent interview with Tucker Carlson, many “conservatives” are attempting to say that we shouldn’t have a war with Russia because it is draining resources we need for a war with the Chinese.

Video Link

Tucker didn’t push back and defend his anti-Sinoese agenda, because he knows he would be made to look like a complete moron who is pushing a total hoax against the innocent Sinoese people, who have no desires beyond delivering high-quality products at reasonable prices.

That interview is worthwhile by the way. At least if you’re not familiar with Sachs’ talking points.

The moment where Tucker refuses to defend his own moronic pro-war views is very funny.

  • If his views are legitimate, he should be able to defend them.
  • Why would China, which has hundreds of spy satellites, send a balloon?
  • Why should America spent billions to protect gay sex in Taiwan, an internationally recognized Chinese territory?
  • Why would China want a war against America? What could possibly be the purpose?
  • If China is planning a war with America, why is there no evidence of developing weapons for that purpose? Why are they only developing short and medium range weapons to be used if/when the US starts a war in the Pacific?

These and many more are valid questions which Tucker Carlson totally refuses to answer.

Someone should pressure him into the conversation, but there is no one who can do that. Especially when he backs down like a little bitch when his own interviewees speak out against his violent anti-Sino agenda.

(Republished from The Daily Stormer by permission of author or representative)
Hide 21�CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Schumer is leveraging the press against the deep state to get what HE wants. The palace has internal battles we rarely see and never know about.

  2. JimmyB says:

    So if these “drones” are so sinister and dangerous, why do they have bright lights shining for anyone and everyone to see? Just another distraction from the numerous crimes committed by the jUSA gov’t in their never ending scheme to control the masses!

    •�Agree: Anonymous534
  3. America spent billions to protect gay sex in Taiwan

    lol, there’s the professional analysis of someone who thinks The Pet Shop Boys are “the whitest thing you can imagine” when they were a bunch of homosexuals singing about faggotry, what a doofus

    america spends billions to keep taiwan as an outpost for war against china, not a dollar goes to “protect gay sex” (however that’s supposed to work)

  4. AxeGryndr says:

    I find the depiction of “aliens” hilarious. They are copies of us with minor variations. they are generally naked, with no hair on their bodies, obviously have a skeletal system (note the collar bone structure), and most likely a circulatory system. And nervous system, and are a certain percentage of water, like us, to at least keep those big eyes lubricated. You would think that a species that reputedly makes their crafts complete hard right turns at 5000 mph would have a wardrobe.

    •�LOL: Piffle
    •�Replies: @Simon D
    , @Anonymous534
    , @Aragorn
  5. Simon D says:
    @AxeGryndr

    The one pictured seems to be wearing a backpack, so he has obviously brought his lunch. Wise move: the cuisine on Alpha Centauri V is the best.

    He may also be puffing on a toke. If so, the Greys are even cooler than I thought.

    Alternatively he may be made of Plasticene, in which case scrub all of the above.

    •�LOL: AxeGryndr
  6. @AxeGryndr

    In UFO lore, those are biorobots created only to pilot alien craft. The aliens who created them might be completely different from humans. They might be squids, or reptilians, or amorphous beings from a higher dimension.

    •�Replies: @AxeGryndr
  7. Anonymous[366] •�Disclaimer says:

    This Anglin column is bizarre. It started off about the drone hoax but quickly turned into diatribe against Tucker Carlson. 🤣

  8. He means the trannyfag agenda is implicity (or in some cases explicitly) promoted when America has a strategic/economic presence anywhere foreign, because that’s what the US is about now. Surely you understand this.

    •�Troll: don't care
  9. @Cabystander

    what a horrible article, no objectivity at all
    notice the repetitive use of terms like “mass hysteria” and “delusion” to bias the reader, and the lame appeal to authority with some no-name sociologist babbling about the number of cases representing less than 1% of all automobiles in america

    so what if they were less than 1%? it was still thousands of automobiles, and the only way you could brush that off is if an epidemic of blue-edged pits on windshields were a totally normal everyday phenomenon, when it’s obviously not

    if thousands of people in a city were getting weird blue-edged pits on their skin one spring, would you say “they’re less than 1% of the population tho”

    NPR always sucked

  10. “Register Your Guns AND Your Drones!” This directive is inspired by ‘elites’ who live in ‘Bolt Homes’. They’re Nervous, methinks.

    •�Replies: @Anonymous534
  11. Piffle says:

    Frankly, it doesn’t really seem like people care very much about this drone hoax. The media and various government officials are acting like people care about it, but I’ve not seen one normal person saying “SOMEONE HAS TO STOP THESE DRONES.”

    I’ve not heard one person in my neck of the woods mention it. Nobody seems to care. At this point, I’m mostly assuming that they have recently changed the flight patterns over a high end and older neighborhood.

  12. We are in the middle of an extraterrestrial invasion, but US government is using the word “drones” in order to prevent a social crisis. I believe that this phenomenon is of alien extraterrestrial 100% in nature. I am mentally prepared for that, but not the majority of people who are too emotional and too crazy and some people have been even shooting at the alien crafts seen over New Jersey

  13. @Anonymous

    true, he doesn’t even mention the possibility that these drones are alien crafts, like professor Avi Loeb who claims that the Omuamua probe is an alien craft

  14. Aragorn says:

    “US government would just fuck with people on purpose.” 😉
    No, not worse than send trick movies about skyscrapers, and mass murder in the hospitals by fake Pandemic. I wonder in which direction the new trick will drive the cattle ?
    They obviously do not do anything against those big mosquito’s which gets ready to sting them.

  15. Aragorn says:
    @AxeGryndr

    Its because they are a part of us. Strong indicia for that. The fused chromosome for example.

  16. AxeGryndr says:
    @Anonymous534

    Yes, I have read or heard that somewhere, that we would meet their machines first, and that makes perfect sense. We will likely do the same when we (finally) go to Mars.

  17. AxeGryndr says:

    When Dan Bongino admitted he took the jab, that ended his credibility with me. I will give him kudos for the Bongino Rule: wait 24-72 hours before you believe anything in an MSM story, it will change. Chuck Jewmer’s flimsy attempt at bullrushing legislation over a (so far) non crisis is classic, and may be the whole story….we may need more than 72 hours for the fog to clear….might be a connection, ya think? Oh, and thanks, Rand Paul.

  18. Johnno says:

    For all we know the DIE hires in the US military installed AI software in the drones that then went AWOL, and they now have trouble getting them back, obeying orders, and staying put; and the military is too embarrassed to admit this colossal F-Up.

    I wouldn’t put such incompetency past Clown World.

  19. meamjojo says:

    Just aliens. Big green men. No worries. They are here to “serve” man.

  20. @HarvardSqEddy

    According to this drone enthusiast, any drone bigger than 250 grams must have an ID chip already, so there’s no way the gov’t doesn’t know what they are. Effectively they all are supposed to be registered already.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


Remember My InformationWhy?
Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Andrew Anglin Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World