');
The Unz Review •�An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
PodcastsKevin Barrett Archive
Alex Krainer on False Flag Warnings and "Syria Trap"

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library •�B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search TextCase SensitiveExact WordsInclude Comments
List of Bookmarks

Rumble link Bitchute link . Note: Kevin has been canceled by Stripe—workarounds are Spotfund and Paypal.

Market analyst and investor Alex Krainer wonders whether by suddenly giving up Syria without a fight, Iran and Russia may have set a trap for the Zio-American Empire: “This surprised nobody. The (claim) that they came by surprise is just is inconceivable to me. That the Russians signed a truce with duplicitous backstabbing Erdogan and then they completely took their eye off the ball and just thought that ‘we have nothing to worry about there’—that’s inconceivable to me. And so the only explanation that makes sense to me is that this was by design. Also, the way the Syrian army folded, it wasn’t just one place. It was a place after place after place after place. From the top, too. It was coordinated. So they were given orders to pull back, to demobilize, to melt away. And then the question is why?

“The only place you walk into that easily is a trap. And so once you remember, how did the West finally break the Soviet Union? They drew them into Afghanistan. So that was the Soviet Union’s quagmire. It’s actually not rocket science.”

We’ll also discuss Alex’s warning that London may be in the crosshairs for a false flag attack.

Video Link

Excerpts:

Kevin Barrett: So Alex, should we start with the London webcams? Have they been turned back on? Whatever happened to those?

Alex Krainer: I have no idea whether they’ve been turned back on. Last I checked was a few days ago, and they were not. They were still black. What happened since then, because it’s been about 10 days since I posted my article, I assume that they’re still black. I guess I could check, but I’m assuming that they’re black.

For me, that’s a very suspicious thing because there are several hundred webcams around London. And since I published my article, a handful of people wrote back and they said oh, look, this one’s working and this one’s working. And in fact, it turned out to be two of them working. Two or three people wrote back that the one on Abbey Road is working, and I checked. It is. And then a couple of them pointed out another one. I forget which one. It’s working.

But all the other ones are black. So that’s not something that can happen randomly, just by some random error that all of a sudden several hundred webcams go offline or go black all at the same time. And I found it very, very alarming because somebody obviously had to make a decision about that. It’s a major European city. What’s the reason why the webcams should be off? To me, the likely reason for that is that they are preparing a false flag attack and that they are hiding evidence.

Let’s suppose that they are going to detonate a nuclear device above London, or a dirty bomb or some kind of a very big explosion. Maybe they would spend a few months shipping out the artwork, shipping out the gold, whatever valuable things they don’t want to be destroyed or don’t want to be looted. And they might be shipping in the explosives. And so maybe it’s better that no evidence of that remains recorded anywhere.

So that could be the reason. But why would our venerable leaders in the West, our dear leaders, do such a nefarious thing? Well, as we know—and I documented this in my article that I published a few days ago—we’ve had several among the most prominent Western leaders, among whom General Mark Milley and Boris Johnson and President Morawiecki of Poland, all saying the same thing: that, quote-unquote, “if we lose in Ukraine, it will be the end of Western hegemony. We will lose the world for generations.” Statements to that effect, and some of them in those exact words.

So how big are the stakes? The stakes are huge.

And we have seen them desperately trying to somehow engineer consent for war in Europe among the Western public. Because we know that there’s no willingness among the Western public to escalate the war, to go collectively to war against Russia, to start another world war on the European continent. And so perhaps consent could be obtained if you had some kind of a very very emotionally charged event, something very spectacular, visible to everyone, happen. And then they could say, oh look at what the Russians have done to us! Now we have to go and kill them!

A mushroom cloud over London would be pretty iconic.

A mushroom cloud over London would be one of those indelible images that would stay with us for all eternity. And if West prevailed in this war by any chance, it would be enshrined in history that Russia dropped a nuclear bomb on London.

And then these recent provocations with storm shadow missiles and the ATACAMs also work to that angle. Because all of a sudden, the Western powers that decided, all of them, the United States included, to authorize Ukraine to launch long range, Western provided missiles to strike deep into Russia. Strategically, that doesn’t change anything. It’s not going to change the trajectory of the war. It’s not going to turn things around for Ukraine. They can inflict some pain on the Russians, blow up a few things, kill a few people, but that’s it. They can’t win the war.

And Vladimir Putin has made it very plain that we understand that this is not Ukraine attacking us, because it’s not Ukraine’s weaponry. Ukrainians are not capable of targeting those weapons, of programming their trajectories, of selecting the targets. Ukrainians can provide the real estate and maybe pull the trigger, but everything else has to be prepared and programmed by Western technicians.

So the Russians understand perfectly that this is an attack by Western powers against Russia proper, which is an act of war. So it seems to me that the only reason why they would be doing it since it’s exacerbating risks of escalation, but it cannot turn around the trajectory of the war, is to provoke a response from Russia. So that the Russia says okay, so now you, the French, you, the British, you, the Americans, are striking at us. Now we’re going to strike back at you. And then, you know, they get to invoke NATO Treaty Article 5. And then you have the confrontation between Russia and the collective West, NATO.

But the Russians are not stupid. They’re not buying the provocation. They’re not falling for it. And they will not strike at any NATO target outside of Ukraine. So in that case, you have to do it yourself, right?

If we look at the history of warfare over centuries around the world, when the ruling establishment has to mobilize their populations, the whole of society effort to go and kill their adversaries for them, to win their war for them, they routinely organize false flag attacks. When we needed to go to start global war on terror, they somehow orchestrated the 9/11 attacks. I hope this is not news to anybody.


Let’s look at Syria then. I would have thought that maybe what happened with Syria was that Russia and the Zio-American empire cut a deal and said, okay, we see Ukraine’s going down one way or another. And so the American side sees Trump’s coming in, new people there who are willing to get out of Ukraine and stop that war. So to let you do that, you’re going to have to give us Syria. And so that would be one explanation for why the Syrian resistance to this so-called liberation from Assad just melted away like nothing.

However, there’s another explanation which may be partly compatible, and that is what you offered in a recent video interview in which you suggested that it was a trap, that you can’t walk that easily into victory. If you walk in that easily, it’s got to be a trap. And you compare this to the Russian bear trap set by Brzezinski when Brzezinski confessed to a French magazine, I think it was Le Point, that he had baited the Russian bear into coming into Afghanistan in order to finish off the USSR. And so maybe the Russians are going to have their revenge by turning the Zionists and the Americans loose on Syria and making it their project and their liability and their responsibility. And maybe that’s not going to work out too well for them.

And so I think you may be onto something. In particular, though I don’t think you stressed this, what I would add to your analysis is that the Russians may see that the U.S. leadership is dominated by Zionists. And the Zionists are willing to sacrifice American imperial interests and strategies in service to their maniacal, delusional Zionist craziness. And so (the Russians say) “let’s let the Americans get hijacked by the Zionists and go insane in Syria and the Middle East. The Americans already lost $8 trillion (on the 9/11 wars for Israel). They lost all their soft power going along with this Zionist 9/11 thing. So let’s get them bogged down in the Middle East again, and get them doing irrational things, because they’re under total Zionist control. The American empire is going to do crazy self-destructive things now. Let them have Syria.” So, yeah, that actually makes a certain amount of sense.

Netanyahu and his merry gang of Zionists have been absolutely desperate to get the Americans to go and kill Iran for them. And so this is a ploy to do it while Biden is still in power. If Scott Ritter’s right, this incursion from Idlib was meant to take place in March of next year, and that they rushed it to take place at the end of November. What induced them to do that? I don’t know exactly, but from the information we have so far, there have been extensive discussions between the Arab state on behalf of the Americans with Bashar al-Assad to try to induce him to distance himself from Iran and from Hezbollah in exchange for normalization with the West, for easing of sanctions and for stabilizing Syria’s economy. These talks were quite advanced and somehow it was arranged that the information about these talks gets to Erdogan as well. And supposedly this panicked him because he sees a threat in it from the point of view of Americans using the Kurds as a lever against him to destabilize Turkey.

And so to my mind, there are two possibilities. Either he reacted to this or he was in cahoots with the Russians and the Iranians and launched this incursion prematurely with the view of pushing the US, UK, NATO and Israel under the bus. The other possibility is that he did it because he wanted to take chunks of Syria and that he has this undying obsession with recreating the Ottoman Empire and consolidating the greater Turania all the way to Turkestan. Okay, it’s plausible, but he would have to be unrealistic, naive, even stupid. Because in this, he’s relying on the Western powers. Particularly MI6 has been trying to bait Erdogan to ally himself with Britain and Poland and Ukraine against Russia. And the bait was the great Turania under Turkish leadership, under Erdogan’s leadership as his legacy.

And quickly tell us, what is Turania precisely?

If you go from Turkey eastwards all the way to China, you have like a whole belt which is populated by Turkic people. You know, Xinjiang province in China, and then, you know, all the Stans, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan and so forth. These are all Turkic people. And this was allegedly offered to Erdogan as his big reward for allying himself with the UK, Poland and Ukraine in this war against Russia in Ukraine. And so this, you know, we know that the MI6 have been very, very busy in Turkey, trying to seduce Turkey into working with them on these Eurasian agendas.

But the US, and probably MI6 also, tried to orchestrate a coup and assassinate Erdogan in 2016. Europe has been stringing along Turkey about their EU membership forever. Turkey has been humiliated by the West repeatedly and treated as a second fiddle. While at the same time, Russia has designated Turkey as the main natural gas hub towards Western markets. They are completing a large nuclear power plant in Turkey as we speak, and they have a program of training up Turkish nuclear engineers.

And remember, Russia saved Erdogan after the US-sponsored coup attempt.

Exactly. The Russians saved Erdogan when they try to assassinate him. And then Russia also financed indirectly, not directly, but indirectly Russia provided money for Turkey during Erdogan’s last presidential elections. So they’ve been helping him extensively for a very long time, while the West has been trying to push Turkey around, regime change it, assassinate Erdogan. They yanked out this F-16 program from Turkey.

So it’s been a bad relationship. And then I believe that the West has already been strategically defeated, both in Ukraine and in the Middle East. And so the idea that Erdogan somehow ended up throwing his lot with the defeated side, which has also been dealing in bad faith with him for a long time, is kind of hard for me to believe.

And then, in the aftermath of the Idlib incursion, we see that…It’s silence. Neither the Russians nor the Chinese are saying much. The Chinese are not saying anything. The Iranians are not saying much. Business as usual continues. The cooperation continues. The investments continue. The Iranians just announced a large, multi-billion dollar investment in Turkey.

So my bet is that this was a similar type of trap set up for the Western Empire as the CIA and Zbigniew Brzezinski set up for the Soviet Union in Afghanistan. And then there’s also the wider context that works with this idea, and that is the fact that both Russia and China want to create a completely new security architecture on the Eurasian continent, because the one we have today is the vestige of British geopolitics, Mackinder’s idea of surrounding the pivot area with an arc of crises, with all these bridgeheads through which wars would constantly be orchestrated to weaken the pivot powers and to keep them always at war, always dependent on Western aid, finance, trade, weaponry, and so forth. And it was basically the British approach to ruling the continent by divide and conquer. And so that’s what we’ve had. constant wars in this region, this arc of crisis in the south of the pivot area.

The pivot area is the expanse defined by Halford Mackinder as the expanse encompassing Russia, Ukraine, the Caucasus, parts of Iran and Kazakhstan and all the way to Afghanistan. And so for the British Empire, this was the optimal geographic area where they deemed that an alternative empire was going to emerge because it was so very rich in resources and population. And (they feared) that such an empire would be much more powerful than a sea empire like the British Empire was. And so they saw it as existential, particularly after the Russians in introduced the Trans-Siberian Railway, because they deemed that that railway would then catalyze development by providing infrastructure and transport and communications. And that from there, this new, very powerful land-based empire would emerge inaccessible to maritime commerce.

And the Belt and Road is the recent version of that.

Exactly, exactly. That’s part of it. That’s definitely, that’s almost exactly what the Brits knew they feared. And at the time, they were especially worried if Russia and Germany should ally themselves one against the other. They didn’t really see China emerging as a potential rival, but by the end of his life, I think in one of his last papers, Mackinder did actually hypothesize that it might actually be China that emerges as a power and then Russia and China together become this alliance that would ultimately shift power from Anglo-American empire to this other emerging pivot power.

Mackinder was talking about the bridgeheads being France, Italy, Egypt, India, Korea. Then we had formation of independent Ukraine, Israel. India was divided into Pakistan and India, the Koreas were divided South and North. We have these flashpoints everywhere and they’re almost constantly at war. So this is what the Russians and the Chinese want to pacify, to have a millennium of peace for the future. And it looks like that may be a real possibility.

So even in the wake of this apparent catastrophe in Syria, it seems that the Saudis and the Iranians and even the Turks, who supposedly just did this and clobbered the Iranians and the Russians, actually, they’re all maybe somewhat on the same page. Well, let’s hope so. And let’s hope that they don’t blow up London and blow up the world. And if they don’t, I’ll have you back again before too long and celebrate.

(Republished from Substack by permission of author or representative)
Hide 30�CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Wokechoke says:

    I saw his explanation in terms of Mackinder’s World Island theory. He elaborated on the maritime power creating a Crisis Zone surrounding Russia/China. North and South Korea for example. Or East West Germany. The proposed DMZ in Ukraine would be used this way. Bleeding Russia then China dry.

    He’s thinking that Xi and Putin realised “Let’s have the Jews and Ottom… Turks have a fight over an Arab populated Damascus”. A crisis between the current NATO keystone and the parasitic Jewish state. It’s fascinating.

  2. Wokechoke says:

    This idea does suggest why Poland got so much sacrificed on re-founding. Poland is a good crisis zone.

  3. Brzezinski confessed to a French magazine, I think it was Le Point, that he had baited the Russian bear into coming into Afghanistan in order to finish off the USSR.

    Except that isn’t what finished off the USSR. It was Regan and Lee Wanta doing currency manipulation. https://eagleonetowanta.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/WantaBiographyIntro2015.pdf

    Good article otherwise.

    •�Disagree: Biff
  4. If any country deserves to be nuked, it’s Perfidious Albion. The possibility of a false flag nuke hadn’t occurred to me, but Britain’s demented enough to try it. The important thing is to call out their scheme and tell them Article 5 doesn’t cover self-harm. It’s right there in United Healthcare’s terms and conditions.

  5. You are forgetting one thing on the siuggestion about US involvement:

    Finland
    Germany
    France
    Poland
    Denmark
    Belgium
    Hungary
    Italy . . .

    Grreat Britain, Sweden . . .

    The expertise exists in Europe to accomplish all of the tasks of warfare. While it is convenient for Russia and others to highlight the US, bottom line. Russia is not contending with the US but nearly all of Europe intent on curbing Russia’s invasion and expanionist goals, if any. Russia has opted to challenge technically profficient western powers. Those countries alone if they chose could settle the matter only the caution are visions of another major European conflagration.

    But the longer they wait, the more likely a larger conflict will emerge —

    But the military expertise is readily avaialable in Europe. The next admin thinks they have a magic bullet —- Ha.

  6. I vaguely recall a good lawyer mentioning that he had a dream about people running around the streets terrified in London after a “dirty nuke” went off, but it never came to pass before he did 10 years ago, so I’ve been kind of half waiting for it.

    •�Replies: @Event Horizon
  7. A123 says: •�Website

    It makes no sense as a “trap” for Israel or the U.S.

    Trump’s incoming 2nd term administration openly states they will not be drawn in.

    Israel’s activities are minor. One strategic mountain position that they were able to take without fighting. And, a few Druze towns where they already had contacts. These villages do not want to fall under Turkish HTS rule: (1)

    Druze Arabs Ask to Be Part of Israel, not Rebel-held Syria

    The Druze leader of al-Suwayda in southwestern Syria also issued a resolution on behalf of his village: We will not agree to live under the rule of the rebels, who are identical to ISIS, we want to live under Israeli rule and become part of Israel.

    Rescuing Druze civilians from potential Turkish HTS aggression will not undermine Palestinian Jews on the world stage.
    ___

    There is a real problem for Erdogan. If his Turkish HTS:

    • Takes the Kurdish area there will be Afghanistan style guerillas and insurgency.
    • Does not secure the region, it could become de facto Kurdistan.

    IMHO it is unlikely that this is a deliberate trap to snare Sunni Türkiye. Too much was given up. The more believable scenario is that Erdogan did not think this through. Hubris for an Ottoman Greater Türkiye led to over reach.

    PEACE 😇
    __________
    (1) https://www.breitbart.com/middle-east/2024/12/13/watch-druze-arabs-ask-to-be-part-of-israel-not-rebel-held-syria/

    •�Replies: @Wokechoke
  8. Booris says:

    Putin’s plan to conquer the UK:

    1) Launch hypersonics into the City of London

    2) Get elected Prime Minister by unanimous vote

  9. anon[328] •�Disclaimer says:

    If there was one article totally beside the point in the Syrian fall that was this one.

    Thanks Kevin for the long tedious ‘interview’ that brings nothing to the debate.

    You see now you have a good reason to censor the comment

    •�Replies: @Haxo Angmark
  10. Complete hopium/copium garbage.

    The fall of Syria is — by far — the biggest win for the hegemonic, anti-multipolar forces since the fall of the Soviet Union.

    •�Agree: Haxo Angmark
    •�LOL: Notsofast
    •�Replies: @Wokechoke
    , @Notsofast
  11. @anon

    more “a loss is actually a win” cope’ium from Barret and Co.

    at the rate our resident White Muslim is going, he’ll still be proclaiming “victory” when Izramerica pulverizes Iran, and Babyface Tsar signs on to the current Uke/NATO Minsk3 surrender terms.

    •�Replies: @Kevin Barrett
  12. Aragorn says:

    “When we needed to go to start global war on terror, they somehow orchestrated the 9/11 attacks. I hope this is not news to anybody.”

    It should read; “start global war of terror”. A little misspell from Goebbels typesetter.

    It looks to be news for Ron Unz.
    Or is he a CIA asset ?

  13. Wokechoke says:
    @Reginald Shropshire

    Syria was created for the French to loot.

  14. Kevin, you may be interested in this, Trump may have admitted the assassination was an act:

    Twitter – WFT?!? Did Donald Trump accidentally admit that the Butler Assassination attempt was “an act” they didn’t want to “make look too perfect?”

  15. @Haxo Angmark

    Seeing you trolls out in force to attack Krainer makes me think he’s onto something.

    •�Replies: @Notsofast
    , @Wokechoke
  16. @purrturbed

    Same.

    London or NYC.

    Something epic seems to be coming shortly, but it’s hard to say where …

  17. Wokechoke says:
    @A123

    A clash between Turkey and Israel is now on the cards.

    •�Replies: @A123
    , @emil nikola richard
  18. A123 says: •�Website
    @Wokechoke

    A clash between Turkey and Israel is now on the cards.

    Possibly. Erdogan’s Greater Türkiye plan extends all the way into Africa. However, it is unlikely to be soon:

    • Erdogan has a more immediate problem in terms of Syrian Kurds. If he captures the land, his forces could be tied up for more than a decade by counter insurgency missions.

    • The Syria/Israeli border is small and Palestinian Jews have much better defensive positions. Many Turkish HTS forces would die in the death funnel. And, it could easily be an embarrassing loss.

    If Erdogan is determined to attack Palestinian Jews, he really needs to absorb Lebanon first, which is also part of his Ottoman Greater Türkiye plan. There is no obvious path to that end without over running both Christians and Druze.

    PEACE 😇

    •�Replies: @Wokechoke
  19. Wokechoke says:
    @A123

    Kurds are a Jewish proxy. As you know, jewboy.

    •�LOL: A123
    •�Replies: @A123
  20. A123 says: •�Website
    @Wokechoke

    ROTFLMAO

    We all know that you are a Shia Muslim. Your pathetic & failed attempt at Taqiyya deception proves it.

    As a Christian I (and everyone else) knows that Kurds are Muslims. They are not Jewish proxies.

    🎄 MERRY CHRISTMAS 🎄

  21. Notsofast says:
    @Reginald Shropshire

    so you’re saying they haven’t won anything in 35 years, can’t argue with that statement. hate to tell you but they haven’t “won” anything yet. remember mission accomplished? that was right after they “accomplished” afghanistan, oh wait a minute, they didn’t accomplish that, until brandon demonstrated his classic pull out, that he developed with ashley in the shower (remember he’s catholic).

    oh, how the mighty have fallen, nafo trolls now have to sell their latest debacle, as a triumph, over the union of the soviet socialist republics of syria.🤣😂

  22. Anonymous[344] •�Disclaimer says:

    Curmudgeon is right, the Russians themselves attributed the Soviet collapse to deteriorating terms of trade between Russian energy and US agriculture. The US lost the ability to influence that element of the trade balance because US agriculture market share tanked and the world did some trustbusting on the petrodollar. Afghanistan was a gnat bite. Chernobyl was an important catalyst.

    But the precondition was the Helsinki Protocol. It got Soviet elites thinking about why they have to dick around with exit visas and Glavlit restrictions. That deficiency in rights now runs the other way, against the NATO bloc. Russia dominates the US in terms of all the most comprehensive human rights measures. Russia elects its leaders while CIA installs theirs in the US and Europe. It’s poor downtrodden Western pukes locked inside the Iron Curtain now.

    Those two elements, mercantile resource constraints plus rights derogations, are a common cause of state collapse. So Russia can continue to SYSTEMA out of the way of US clusterfucks until terminal corruption incapacitates the CIA regime’s industrial base.

  23. Notsofast says:
    @Kevin Barrett

    kevin, don’t be so hard on old asho skidmark, he forced to troll in order to feed his family, it’s the only job he can get, in order to feed his elderly mother. his brothers nafo, zato and zio are also trolls, collectively they are known as the skidmarks brothers.

  24. Wokechoke says:
    @Kevin Barrett

    Historians are not sure if the battle of Tours was a cattle raid or a clash of civilisations. They can’t get the story straight. Who is to definitely say what the sack of Damascus was today?

    Video Link

    It’s interesting to think that the Saracens in Western France were franchisee holders to a Relgio-military authority then based in Damascus and Baghdad. Oh how low Damascus has fallen. Now a check point between Jews and Turks. Frances Aquitaine 1300 years ago a Border March while Damascus was an imperial capital.

  25. @Wokechoke

    Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the face.

  26. @Yukon Jack

    Given Donald Trump at the time was the former president of the United States, it would beggar belief to learn that no photographs were taken of his bullet-lacerated right ear when he was being treated. The controversy surrounding whether it was an actual assassination attempt, or a staged/rehearsed psychological operation, can easily become settled (and should become settled, or divisive questions and doubts will certainly persist):

    Make the medical photographs (evidence) public for all Americans, and all people on Earth, to see.

    •�Replies: @Kevin Barrett
  27. @Jerry Alatalo

    The reason why there are no medical photos, and why every photo of Trump’s ear after the shooting shows no damage whatsoever, is obvious. https://kevinbarrett.substack.com/p/john-hankey-discusses-his-new-film

    •�Replies: @Wokechoke
  28. Wokechoke says:
    @Kevin Barrett

    Video Link

    Well I saw Trumpoleon’s hat get shot in the movies. Snifff.

  29. @Yukon Jack

    Was or was not a man killed there? If it was an act did it include a real homicide? Kamala Harris seemed to go along if it was an act and Donald the Fat was supposedly implicated in a homicide.

    Some K Fabe.

    •�Replies: @Kevin Barrett
  30. @emil nikola richard

    The perps in this kind of operation would likely include a real homicide to make the truth “unthinkable.”

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


Remember My InformationWhy?
Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Kevin Barrett Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The evidence is clear — but often ignored