サクサク読めて、アプリ限定の機能も多数！
トップへ戻る
iPad Air
www.brendangregg.com
Recent posts: 29 Oct 2024 » AI Flame Graphs 22 Jul 2024 » No More Blue Fridays 24 Mar 2024 » Linux Crisis Tools 17 Mar 2024 » The Return of the Frame Pointers 10 Mar 2024 » eBPF Documentary 28 Apr 2023 » eBPF Observability Tools Are Not Security Tools 01 Mar 2023 » USENIX SREcon APAC 2022: Computing Performance: What's on the Horizon 17 Feb 2023 » USENIX SREcon APAC 2023: CFP 02 May 2022 » Brendan
(This is based on Table 4.1 "Linux Crisis Tools" in SysPerf 2.) Some longer notes: [1] bcc and bpftrace have many overlapping tools: the bcc ones are more capable (e.g., CLI options), and the bpftrace ones can be edited on the fly. But that's not to say that one is better or faster than the other: They emit the same BPF bytecode and are equally fast once running. Also note that bcc is evolving and
Sometimes debuggers and profilers are obviously broken, sometimes it's subtle and hard to spot. From my flame graphs page: (Click for original SVG.) This is pretty common and usually goes unnoticed as the flame graph looks ok at first glance. But there are 15% of samples on the left, above "[unknown]", that are in the wrong place and missing frames. The problem is that this system has a default li
static, benchmarking, tuning: sar, perf-tools, bcc/BPF: bpftrace, BPF book: Images license: creative commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0. This page links to various Linux performance material I've created, including the tools maps on the right. These use a large font size to suit slide decks. You can also print them out for your office wall. They show: Linux observability tools, Linux static perfor
The Utilization Saturation and Errors (USE) Method is a methodology for analyzing the performance of any system. It directs the construction of a checklist, which for server analysis can be used for quickly identifying resource bottlenecks or errors. It begins by posing questions, and then seeks answers, instead of beginning with given metrics (partial answers) and trying to work backwards. The re
Recent posts: 24 Mar 2024 » Linux Crisis Tools 17 Mar 2024 » The Return of the Frame Pointers 10 Mar 2024 » eBPF Documentary 28 Apr 2023 » eBPF Observability Tools Are Not Security Tools 01 Mar 2023 » USENIX SREcon APAC 2022: Computing Performance: What's on the Horizon 17 Feb 2023 » USENIX SREcon APAC 2023: CFP 02 May 2022 » [email protected] 15 Apr 2022 » Netflix End of Series 1 09 Apr 2022 » Te
Recent posts: 22 Jul 2024 » No More Blue Fridays 24 Mar 2024 » Linux Crisis Tools 17 Mar 2024 » The Return of the Frame Pointers 10 Mar 2024 » eBPF Documentary 28 Apr 2023 » eBPF Observability Tools Are Not Security Tools 01 Mar 2023 » USENIX SREcon APAC 2022: Computing Performance: What's on the Horizon 17 Feb 2023 » USENIX SREcon APAC 2023: CFP 02 May 2022 » [email protected] 15 Apr 2022 » Netfl
This is based on my bcc Tutorial, and many also exist in bpftrace. I chose these to find the most performance wins with the fewest tools. Note that runqlat and profile can have noticable overheads, so I'd run these tools for between 10 and 60 seconds only and generate a report. Some are low enough overhead to be run 24x7 if desired (e.g., execsnoop, biolatency, tcplife, tcpretrans). There is alrea
次のページ
このページを最初にブックマークしてみませんか？
『Brendan Gregg's Homepage』の新着エントリーを見る
j次のブックマーク
k前のブックマーク
lあとで読む
eコメント一覧を開く
oページを開く
