');
The Unz Review •ï¿½An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
�BlogviewPatrick Lawrence Archive
Putin and Xi in Beijing: Steps Into the 21st Century

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library •ï¿½B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text�Case Sensitive �Exact Words �Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping added another to their count of 40–odd summit meetings when the Russian and Chinese presidents convened in Beijing, later proceeding to Harbin in Northeast China, for two days of talks that ended Friday. At 9:55 Thursday evening Beijing time, a day’s work done, the two sat behind a long table draped in green to address “members of the media,†as Xi put it.

Western officials and the media that clerk for them have done their best, per usual, to dismiss this latest encounter of the Russian and Chinese leaders as of no account, just two authoritarians bound together by nothing more than their shared enmity toward the West. Pay no attention. We ought not miss the significance of what Putin and Xi had to say this week to one another and to the rest of humanity. The world just turned once again.

The Kremlin was first to publish a transcript of their “Media Statement Following Russia–China Talks.†The two presidents spoke in turn—Xi, the host, going first and Putin to follow. Here is a snippet drawn from Xi’s remarks:

We signed joint statements on enhancing the comprehensive partnership and strategic cooperation between the People’s Republic of China and the Russian Federation for a new era…. China and Russia have served as a role model by showing others ways of building state-to-state ties of a new kind and working together as two major neighboring powers … based on the principles of respect and equality.

Xi spoke in this vein for several minutes. Here is a little of what Putin then contributed:

Our talks have reaffirmed that Russia and China have similar or identical views on many international and regional issues.

Both countries have an independent and sovereign foreign policy. We are working together to create a fairer and more democratic multipolar world order based on the central role of the U.N. and its Security Council, international law, cultural and civilizational diversity, as well as a calibrated balance of interests of all members of the international community.

There are two things to note about these remarks straight off the top.

One, Western media have reported for months that there is a rift between Beijing and Moscow just below the surface. The Chinese do not approve of Russia’s military intervention in Ukraine, we have read. The bilateral relationship is radically unbalanced in Russia’s favor and of little use to China. Etc. This is nonsense, we can now see. In their brief presentation to the media and in other statements since, Xi and Putin have made it plain that there is virtually no air between the non–West’s two leading powers. As to the Ukraine question, to be noted right away, China has been studiously neutral while cognisant of the West’s provocations. Russia has never asked for more than this.

If Xi and Putin have made it a point to display their two nations’ closeness over the years—and their own as friends as well as statesmen, indeed—the two days they spent together this week mark an important public reaffirmation of their shared commitment to that “fairer and more democratic multipolar world†Putin mentioned Thursday. We have told you we have begun to build a new world order, they may as well have said. We’re on for this project. Together with others we will get this done.

Two, and related to the above, consider the May 16 joint statement from a few steps back. Apart from what is in it, what is conspicuously absent? There is no mention of the West, is there? The tone is strikingly self-confident and entirely self-referential. In my read, the two leaders could not have more clearly if subtly demonstrated that the new world order of which they speak is to be an initiative the non–West will advance whether or not the Atlantic world approves or wishes to participate in its construction.

In the first few weeks of this year, Sergei Lavrov gave a press conference that, although we could not know this at the time, previewed the just-concluded Sino–Russian summit and its larger significance. As the Russian foreign minister reviewed Russia’s foreign relations at the start of 2024, and listed the members of Moscow’s “close circleâ€â€”all non–Western nations, some of which are traditionally aligned with the U.S.—Lavrov announced Moscow’s intent “to remove any dependence on the West.†That is TASS, the Russian news agency, not me, although I commented on Lavrov’s remarks in this space at the time.

I also quoted a scholar of Russia and Eurasia named Gordon Hahn, who read the Lavrov press conference more acutely than anyone I know. Hahn’s remarks, during a segment of The Duran, the webcast produced daily in London, are worth requoting for their insight into what just happened when Putin and Xi met for their latest summit:

“For Russia, it looks now, the West is no longer its ‘Other.’… Russia has always identified itself, motivated itself, driven itself in relation to Europe. Now Putin is turning away from that. He said that we are no longer to define ourselves, look at ourselves, through the European prism. For now, we will put all our eggs in one basket, and that is Eurasia…. This close bilateral relationship, of Europe as Russia’s Other, is ending…

The joint statements Xi mentioned—Reuters reported Thursday that the two leaders signed one that runs to 7,000 words—are yet to be available at “Kremlin.ru†and “fmprc.org,†where documents of this kind are customarily made public. But as ScheerPost awaits these, it is already evident that Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin are intent on continuing to pry open the 21st century in the service of the new world order both describe as their overarching objective.

ORDER IT NOW

The timing of this summit is significant. It marks the 75th anniversary of Sino–Russian diplomatic relations. Moscow was the first nation to open formal ties with China after Mao declared the People’s Republic. Mao took Beijing October 1, 1949. The Soviet Union recognized on October 2. In referencing this occasion, Xi and Putin clearly intend to give relations as they are the ballast of history. This is not a passing partnership of convenience, they mean to say.

More immediately to the point, the Biden regime has dispatched a procession of officials to China in recent months, all to cajole China to bend to a lengthening list of sanctions, export controls, and tariffs intended to slow or subvert its economic development. Most recently, Secretary of State Blinken, during a three-day visit late last month, threatened Beijing with “consequencesâ€â€”how they love to strike the ominous pose in Washington—if it did not stop supplying Russia with “dual use†products—semiconductors, industrial components and the like that the U.S. asserts may have military applications.

The extremely warm welcome Xi just extended to Putin is nothing if not a piquant reply to these threats and attempted coercions. Was it a pointed snub, a poke in the eye? It may look like one, but it would be a mistake to read it this way. In hosting the Russian leader, the greatest bête noire the U.S. has confected the whole of the postwar era, Xi gave us a display only of China’s indifference toward the policy hawks in Washington and among its trans–Atlantic satellites.

If Putin is intent on breaking Russia’s dependence on the West, as TASS well put it at the start of the year, Xi appears committed to a variant of the same position. China’s relations with the West are denser and more complex of course, because America and the Europeans are far more dependent on China’s economic production and investments. But Xi and Putin share a grasp of history’s movement that is far beyond Blinken and the rest of the Biden regime. Both leaders signaled this week they are confident that the dynamism that will define our new era—economic, diplomatic, even philosophic—no longer lies in the Atlantic world.

And so they got on with it this week.

â– 

It is two years and a few months since, on the eve of the Winter Olympics in Beijing, Putin and Xi made dramatically public their “Joint Statement on International Relations Entering a New Era and Global Sustainable Development.†This was a kind of declaration of intent in 5,500 words. In it the two leaders offered an analysis of global geopolitics and of the disorder that, then as now, threatened to overtake the world. Facing forward, they declared “a new world orderâ€â€”this made the phrase official—as the planet’s most pressing imperative. I continue to view the “Joint Statement,†as I did at the time, as the most important political document advanced so far in the 21st century.

The latest Putin–Xi summit marks a significant recommitment to the principles set out in the statement of Feb. 4, 2022. The two again cite their dedication to rebuilding “a U.N.–centered system of international relations and an international order based on international law,†as Xi put it. He elaborated:

We have been coordinating our positions within multilateral platforms such as the United Nations, APEC [the Asia–Pacific Economic Cooperation forum] and the G20 [the Group of 20 advanced and middle-income nations] to promote the emergence of a multipolar world and economic globalization based on genuine multilateralism.

That is the fourth of five principles Xi listed in his remarks to media. Here he is noting the last:

The fifth principle deals with promoting a political settlement for hotspots in the interest of truth and justice. Today’s world is still plagued by [a] Cold War mentality. Aspirations to securing a unilateral hegemony, bloc-based confrontation, and power politics pose a direct threat to peace and security for all countries around the world.

Unilateral hegemony, bloc-based confrontation: This sort of language will be familiar to those who have followed the public statements of senior Chinese officials, notably Xi and Foreign Minister Wang Yi, over the past several years. And I was pleased to note that a piece published May 16 by the PRC’s State Council cited the Five Principles Zhou Enlai famously formulated in the mid–1950s to define Chinese foreign policy. Xi’s five, in my read, are a modernized version of Zhou’s.

Zhou’s Principles, which were adopted by the Non–Aligned Movement at the famous conference Sukarno hosted at Bandung in 1955, are simply stated: respect for the sovereignty of others, respect for territorial integrity, noninterference in the internal affairs of others, a commitment to acting for mutual benefit, and a commitment to peaceful coexistence. I have detected these as subtext in Sino–Russian communiqués since the two sides issued the “Joint Statement†two years ago. Now they are restated publicly. It will be no bad thing if those coalescing around a new world order adopt them as the NAM did 70 years ago next year.

Something important must be said in this connection: Neither Xi nor Putin is “aligned†against the U.S. or its trans–Atlantic allies. Neither stands against cooperation with the U.S. or the rest of the West as they join others to build a new order. That is the concoction of U.S. officials and those who report upon them and is intended merely to confirm that China and Russia must always be understood to act as dangerous enemies of the U.S. in particular.

“China–Russia axis heralds an ominous future,†was the headline atop a piece the Center for European Policy Analysis published on the eve of the Putin–Xi summit. CEPA is, admittedly, one of those Washington civil-society groups, neoliberal to the core, that does not say who funds it while standing entirely in favor of “bloc confrontations.†But its take on Sino–Russian relations was typical of what we read in supposedly more serious mainstream media this week.

“Putin and Xi pledged a new era and condemned the United States,†Reuters reported May 15. The New York Times reported the same day, “Mr. Xi considers Russia an important counterweight in China’s rivalry with the United States.†It went on to explain, “The two leaders are expected to present a united front. But they have different agendas.â€

Where do they get this pitiful stuff? Nobody condemned the U.S. in Beijing this week. Is there some question of Sino–Russian unity at this point? Can you find “competing agendas†in anything that has come out of the summit to date? I cannot. These are Western-centric fabrications intended to sustain the broadly held impression that Russia and China are malign adversaries, while obscuring the very salient fact that the only thing China and Russia oppose when they look Westward is hegemonic power.

â– 

The summits Putin and Xi are evidently fond of tend to be high-concept, as they say in Hollywood. This is as it should be, in my view. Ours is a moment of historical magnitude. We witness an immense shift in global power—at least to the extent those purporting to lead the West and their clerks in media fail to obscure this reality from us. But as China and Russia deepen and broaden their ties—“strategic cooperation,†a phrase used repeatedly this week, is new in the bilateral lexicon—the substantive density of the relationship is impossible to miss.

As both sides enthusiastically noted this week, bilateral trade came to $240 billion last year—$40 billion above the announced target. In the first two months of this year, two-way trade came to $37 billion, according to a Business Insider report published in March, suggesting a 2024 total of $222 billion, a touch below this year’s figure. But trade statistics tend to bounce around, one month to the next. Chinese customs reported trade of $76 billion in the first four months of this year, in line with a 2025 forecast of $300 billion—a 25 percent increase over two years.

As important as the volume and value is the currency in which trade is settled. China has been eager to internationalize the yuan for years, and Russia’s war in Ukraine has proven a big boost. Nearly a quarter of Russia’s imports are now settled in yuan, up from 4 percent a couple of years ago. No, we are not surprised to learn that the yuan surpassed the dollar last year as the most traded currency in the Moscow foreign-exchange market.

It is oil, gas, minerals and other resources eastward from Russia to China and manufactured goods and technology westward from China to Russia. So it is pipelines and tankers in one direction, by and large, and rail freight in the other. Bloomberg reported in March that Russia is spending heavily on improvements to its rail links to and from Chinese industrial centers, and once again there is no surprise here. This shows how the economic relationship is densifying as we speak.

Collaboration on nuclear power research, defense-related research, high-technology research: There appear to be few economic sectors Beijing and Moscow are leaving out. But what interests me most are advances in little corners of the Chinese economy, small business enterprises right down to Chinese medicine makers who want to see what’s what in the Russian market. This is people-to-people stuff, and so far as I can make out the Russians and Chinese leaderships count it important in the long-term, enduring densification of the relationship.

This is why, or one reason, Xi invited Putin to Harbin for the second day of their summit. Harbin is among China’s most interesting cities. Russians built the modern city after they completed a rail line in Northeast China in the first years of the last century. Its architecture remains a cosmopolitan mix of Russian, European and Chinese influences. If Xi and Putin wanted to display the depth and intimacy of Sino–Russian relations—altogether their organic nature—they could not have done better than to stroll around Harbin like a couple of companionable, pose-for-the-cameras boulevardiers, as they did Friday.

It will be a long walk through the 21st century before Russia, China and the rest of the non–West arrive at the new world order these nations advocate. They will get there. Some important steps were taken in Beijing and Harbin this week. This is how history’s wheel turns.

(Republished from Scheerpost by permission of author or representative)
�
Hide 60�CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Notsofast says:

    when you see xi, greet putin with his arms wide, in the international sign of, “give me a hug, bro!”, that’s all we really need to know. i can hear henry kissinger plaintively wailing from the ninth circle of hell.

    china is neutral and blah, blah, blah, because they still have major financial exposure to the zioneocon ponzi scheme/death star but behind the scenes the military technologies and intelligence, are being shared not only amongst themselves but they have brought north korea into the fold and both are working closely with the iranians, as well.

    china and russia is a match made in heaven, these two remaining superpowers, perfectly compliment one another, have no need to compete with one another, and fill in any economic weaknesses in their respective economies. they are brics and all the second teir nations in brics will follow their lead. if india (as argentina has done), decides to throw in with the dying western world, good luck to both of them, but the west is doomed and turning india into the next china, is setting the west back 50 years, while russia and china are surging ahead by leaps and bounds, both economically and technologically.

    •ï¿½Agree: JR Foley
    •ï¿½Replies: @xyzxy
    , @one nobody
  2. ltlee says:

    One, Western media have reported for months that there is a rift between Beijing and Moscow just below the surface. The Chinese do not approve of Russia’s military intervention in Ukraine, we have read.

    I think Beijing’s nuanced view could be elucidated by the comment of Ambassador Liu.

    “The ambassador drew a parallel between Ukraine and the other former Soviet republics that declared independence from Moscow when the Soviet Union broke up in 1991.

    “With regards to international law, even these ex-Soviet Union countries, they do not, they do not have the status — how to say it? — that’s effective in international law, because there is no international agreement to solidify their status as a sovereign country,†Lu told news channel LCI.”

    https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/china-affirms-ex-soviet-nations-sovereignty-after-ambassador-comments

    Of course, China has no problem recognizing ex-Soviet Union countries as independent and sovereign countries. At the same time, bilateral border must be bilaterally determined and agreed upon. Otherwise it is just an unilateral claim. US and/or EU acceptance of their claimed borders would not change this reality.

    Until Ukraine’s border with Russia, originally an internal USSR border, is clearly de-limited by internationally accepted agreement, in this case, between Ukraine and Russia, it is difficult for China to reach a definitive conclusion concerning Russia’s Special Operation.

    •ï¿½Replies: @annamaria
  3. “It will be a long walk”. Agreed, but a future worth feeling optimistic about. Things are pretty dark in Africa as always, but we have examples to live up to in China, Russia, India, etc.

  4. Godly8 says:

    It’s an extremely positive development but I hope they don’t underestimate the inhuman viciousness of the Atlantacist gangsters, who are beginning to resemble rabid animals backed into a corner. There’s no telling what they might do in a last desperate bid to hold on to power.

    •ï¿½Agree: CelestiaQuesta
  5. ghali says:

    Will the new China-Russia led “Multipolar World Order” be better than the Fascistic US-led “Rules-based Order”? Only time will tell.

  6. Anonymous[388] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:

    It would prove interesting to this leading edge boomer to return to life at mid-century (a mere 25 years hence) and ascertain how the economies of the three principle actors stack up if allowed to come to laissez faire isostasy sans artificial manipulation via wars, edicts, sanctions, tariffs and other non-competitive “rules” and “regulations.” But to see that I’d have to live considerably beyond the five-score years of life required to be a centenarian. However, I will say this: Uncle Sam and his present national debt in excess of thirty trillion dollars is already thirty trillion dollars behind both China and Russia, neither of which have any national debt. Moreover, both his competitors have long ago made up-grades to infrastructure that Sam simply cannot even dream about, even as he continues to steal and sabotage the assets of his opposition, especially Russia. You can’t tell me that Germany, France and the rest of the captive Western nations actually look up to the United States and want to emulate its criminality. In reality they are all just waiting, searching and hoping for that crack in the political/economic edifice that will enable their escape from Washington’s thrall.

  7. There are decades that go by as if weeks happen and there are weeks that go by as if decades happen”; “Sometimes history needs a push”, Lenin

    “百年未有之大å˜å±€ã€‚。。â€ï¼Œä¹ è¿‘å¹³

    •ï¿½Agree: Anonymous534
  8. xyzxy says:
    @Notsofast

    … if india (as argentina has done), decides to throw in with the dying western world…

    Here’s the thing. India will not ‘throw in’ in the same or similar sense as Western NATO countries, but may well temporarily play off the Anglo-American-Jewish Empire against China because of Pakistan, contiguous border concerns, and economic competition.

    Also, India stands to benefit from US sanctions against China–picking up the manufacturing slack as it were.

    But at the end of the day Modi (or whomever is running the place) is for Modi and India. They are not pro-Western in any sense of the term, and other than opportunism (running convenience stores, Interstate motels, physician services etc) they don’t give a damn about America–or what is left of America.

    Argentina? Simply a blip on a map, somewhere. Could possibly be a nice place, but that’s another story altogether.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Notsofast
  9. There are some problems from a South African perspective, mainly South Africa itself. We could be the weakest link in BRICS.

    SA is owned by the World Bank, the IMF and the West. We receive a lot of charity from the US, and we are ruled by a self-serving kleptomaniac ruling party with outdated ideas and a deep nostalgia for Cold War era communism. The ANC is trying to introduce a universal basic income grant, and national health insurance into third world economy that already has more welfare recipients than taxpayers.

    I’m Gen X, here’s a Boomer’s opinion:


    Video Link

    •ï¿½Thanks: Agent76
    •ï¿½Replies: @Jared Taylor fan
    , @Rev. Spooner
  10. @Notsofast

    Agreed; and adding to that one fact. Israel was quiet an important thug for the US Corporate Complex, around the 1973 Oil embargo and the establishment of the Petro Dollar. Israel was the bully in the ME.
    Today, the US will have to come to terms with its debt service and the serious question of Guns vs. Butter. The days of raping other nations for their resources are coming to an end. In addition, the US is beginning to husband its vast energy resources, which renders the need for a Petro Dollar and an Israeli policeman in the ME, at best a situation of diminishing returns and at worst Armageddon.
    If the US sobers up and rehabilitates its political system from foreign interference, it will join the Brics and free 25% of its total budget, which is half of what it spends on the MIC. Even with that massive reduction it will spend more than all the UN Securty Council permanent members combined spend on their military. With this inevitable necessity, the US can begin paying its debts, reducing its taxes and building infrastructure to enhance the lives of its citizens and rebuild a well educated and competitive workforce.
    The remaining question is this: where does Israel fit in this, imperative scenario? The zionist project shall and must be considered dead weight. In a sober reality, it is the ball and chain that must be jettisoned overboard.
    It is that simple.
    Israel must learn to live with its neighbors or perish. America is done with the zionist project.

  11. Rich says:

    After watching the West grab Russian and Iranian cash deposits and other assets, why would any country ever trust the West again? Of all the stupid moves we’ve seen, this is one of the stupidest. There’s no reason China and Russia can’t work together peacefully for their common benefit and defense. If the American ruling class hadn’t become an avaricious band of sexual degenerates, we all could have worked together. That bird has flown.

  12. @one nobody

    >Paying debnts
    There will be no one to collect those debnts if America breaks free from its Jewish masters. As for China’s handful of American treasuries I doubt they will try to collect from whoever is left standing post-civil war 2.0 burgerloo edition.

    •ï¿½Replies: @one nobody
  13. Anynomous says:

    American and british have lost the war against Russia and China. What morons… they even said that they will try to win Russia and China at the same time! Who happen to be neighbours with huge resources, production capacity and millions of men who are ready to kill invading american and british terrorists.

    These primitive animals understand only legal violence. When they will legally kill enough american and british, only after that these animals understand to keep distance. They dont understand anything else. They arent human.

    •ï¿½Replies: @迪路
  14. The West is so so bankrupt that it has to steal foreign assets and go and fight wars to steal some more.

  15. “[T]he Five Principles Zhou Enlai famously formulated in the mid–1950s to define Chinese foreign policy.”

    They are as follows:

    1) Steal Tibet
    2) Steal East Turkmenistan
    3) Steal Inner Mongolia
    4) Steal Manchuria
    5) Steal Askai Chin

  16. ld says:

    A Ukrainian mobilized soldier, surrounded by his dead comrades, tells a horrifying story of what is happening to mobilized men at the front.

    •ï¿½Replies: @ariadna
  17. @Aleatorius

    “China ought to smile at the Sikh movement for Khalistan… ” and for Kashmir, Seven Sisters, Naxaland,… too. 😀

    [MORE]

    China ought to smile at the Sikh movement for Khalistan…

    (Op/Ed) Thursday 3rd of April 2008

    Dr. Amarjit Singh, Khalistan Affairs Center

    China ought to smile at the Sikh movement for Khalistan & support the aspirations of Christian Nagas for Nagalim which steps will immediately end India’s anti-China subversive activities in Tibet, Dharamsala & around the world long before the XXIX Olympiad Former Defence minister George Fernandes talks of plans to‘ambush’ the Chinese Olympic torch relay in India on 17 April, 2008!

    How come ‘His Holiness’ the Dalai Lama, the Human Rights activist, chose to remain silent, unlike His Holiness the Pope, about the 1984 Indian state-sponsored pogroms against the Sikhs?

    Washington D.C. Wednesday April 02, 2008: India’s leading English language newspaper, the Times of India, in an expose on March 30, reports that, few groups on this planet can match the ability of the Dalai Lama and his cohorts, in the Tibetan diaspora, to network, make friends and milk the power of naïve Western sympathy for ‘harmless-looking purple-robed’ monks who skillfully supply the Western media with gory tales and images of Chinese ‘oppression’ and ‘aggression’ in Tibet, which are floated on several hundred websites, the authenticity of which information cannot be verified independently.

    The above mentioned Times of India report shows how a few Tibetan activists, trained in securing support from the most improbable corners of human conscience, began a signature campaign in Mumbai recently. Within a few hours, thousands of Dalits, (‘Untouchables’) who were protesting nearby about the suffocating socio-economic discriminations against them in caste-ridden India, signed a petition pledging support ‘without having expanded their constituency’. The signatures were turned into a memorandum, by the Tibetan protesters, which was later forwarded to Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

    Likewise, ‘His Holiness’ the Dalai Lama and members of his Tibet-government-in-exile living in Dharamsala, India, since 1959, have also learnt the art of telling their side of the ‘Tibet’ story while refusing to recognize or empathize with gory events that took place in their Indian neighborhood. For example, the Dalai Lama, a ‘holy man’ did not acknowledge even once, (unlike His Holiness the Pope) the cruelty of the June 1984 Indian Army attack on the Darbar Sahib, the holiest Sikh shrine in Amritsar, located only a hundred miles away from Dharamsala; or, condemn, even once, the November 1984, state-sponsored bloody pogrom which took place in Delhi, located two hundred miles from Dharamsala, in which over ten thousand Sikh men, women and children were murdered, in three days, after a ‘wink and a nod’ from none other than the then Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi; or, raise his voice in sadness and human sympathy at the murder of thousands of Sikh Youth who were hunted down and murdered in ‘false encounters’ in the Punjab by Indian armed police, in the dark decade of the 1980’s, when a whole generation of Sikhs was eliminated by the Indian rulers; or, even once empathize with the beleaguered Nagas by taking a public stand against the bloody Indian state-sponsored genocide, which has been carried out by the Indian Army for over half a century, in Christian-majority Nagalim and other parts of North Eastern India inhabited mainly by fellow-Mongoloid people of Tibetan ancestry who seek freedom as they do not want to live in a caste-ridden Indian colony.

    The Dalai Lama and his henchmen, it is quite obvious, are well aware that as the dates of the August 2008 World Olympics approach, the global media’s interest in China is highly ‘cashable’. Dalai Lama & Co., therefore, see the disturbance they seem to have covertly engineered in Lhasa, as a great opportunity to embarrass the ‘Middle Kingdom’ – China – which it seems has made the mistake of underestimating the soft-spoken Dalai Lama’s reach and propensity for ‘mischief’. Beijing also seems to have ignored the deep involvement of India’s numerous Intelligence Agencies in subversive activity, against China, inside Tibet, in India and rest of the world, while overestimating the soothing effect of massive Chinese investments which have resulted in outstanding economic progress in the Tibetan economy which has maintained more than 12% development growth rate for seven consecutive years – one of the highest plus rates in the world.

    Meanwhile, India’s National Security Adviser M.K. Narayanan, it seems, has made a Freudian slip during a telephone conversation the Chinese State Councillor Dai Bingguo had with him, last week, when Narayanan is reported to have wished a ‘complete success’ of the Beijing Olympics while asserting that, “India will always stick to this position as it has been doing all along.†This loaded remark has been interpreted to mean, (by observers, like this column, who know the devious Chanakiyan mindset of the Indian rulers) that India’s 50-years long subversive activity in Tibet will continue as is evident from the plans by Indian Intelligence agencies to ‘ambush’ the Olympic Torch relay when it arrives in India this month (on April 17) from Pakistan. A former Indian Defence Minister, George Fernandes, has let the proverbial ‘cat out of the bag’ when, according to the HINDU newspaper, he told Karan Thapar’s “Devil’s Advocate†program on CNN-IBN, last week in Delhi that, “the Olympic torch should not be allowed to come to India and that he had asked his ‘colleagues’ and others to make ‘whatever effort’ was required to prevent the Olympic flame’s run in this countryâ€. No wonder a so-called copycat Tibetan ‘Independence Torch’ has been suddenly unveiled in Dharamsala, on 25 March, (where the Dalai Lama, and his Indian financed government-in-exile are based) according to a report in the Khaleej Times a Dubai-based English language newspaper. This ‘Tibetan torch’ is reported to have reached New Delhi last Sunday on its journey around the world to highlight the Tibetan cause and bring the Tibetan protests to world attention before the start of the Games of the XXIX Olympiad being held in Beijing from 8 to 24 August, 2008.

    Interestingly, a senior Indian diplomat, one Kanwal Sibal, a former Foreign Secretary of India, in an article headlined, “Tibet Is Our Best Card To Settle Borders With China†(published in the latest issue of the popular OUTLOOK news magazine – of 7 April, 2008) has suggested that, “Unless shaken, Beijing will have no incentive to deal with the issue.†The article indicates the level of suicidal jingoism prevalent in the thinking of senior Indian decision-makers and the depth of Indian involvement in the disturbances in Tibet as well as worldwide protests. The OUTLOOK article also explains India’s suicidal policy on Tibet and the Dalai Lama as the article goes on to assert that, “While giving asylum to the Dalai Lama in 1959, India imposed the condition that he would not engage in any political activity on Indian soil. In 1959, there may have been some logic in putting restraints on the Dalai Lama in the expectation of reaching a peaceful border settlement with China. But the 1962 conflict, the occupation of large tracts of Indian territory by China since then, and the enormous damage to India’s security inflicted by China’s policies towards Pakistan in particular should have convinced us to revise our thinking about the political utility of the Dalai Lama card.†It is obvious that Mr. Kanwal Sibal’s above opinion piece, in OUTLOOK news magazine about India using the Tibet ‘card’ against China, is written with an eye to Western applause for such a stance. ‘Khalistan Calling’ dated March 26, 2008, (headlined, “What can India do if China diverts the Sutlej river in Tibet or fires non-nuclear missiles at Dharamshala in anger & hits the Bhakra Nangal dam instead? “NOTHING!†provided an honest educated analysis of the hopeless military/geographical situation that exists, a la 1962, for India if it ever chose to confront China in the Himalayas over Tibet or the Dalai Lama or any other issue.

    India’s neighbors perhaps do not realize that the world’s 26 Million muscular Sikhs (3 million free and prosperous in the diaspora and 23 million captive in Indian occupied Punjab) all of whom recite a daily prayer for the return of Sikh rule (‘Raj Karayga Khalsa’) are India’s ‘Achilles heel’. The Indian rulers, an evil nexus of the minority Brahmin and Bania castes (hardly 4 % of India’s population) know that, and are therefore, terrified of the day when a neighbor of India (China &/or Pakistan) decides to ‘smile’ at the Sikhs by noticing their aspiration for a buffer state of Khalistan. An economically viable, water and food rich, buffer Sikh state East of the Pakistan border (and West of the Chinese border) a la the brave Nagas who are also fighting for an independent oil-rich buffer state of Nagalim, West of Myanmar, East of Bangladesh and South of the Chinese border. There is no doubt that a friendly Chinese interest in acquiring more information about the proposed buffer state of Khalistan would electrify the Sikhs and terrify the Indian rulers into putting a quick end to Dalai Lamas provocative theatrics and Indian covert activity in Tibet and Dharamsala pronto, long before the start of the Games of the XXIX Olympiad being held in Beijing from 8 to 24 August, 2008.

    Related link: http://www.panthic.org/news/129/ARTICLE/3996/2008-04-03.html

    •ï¿½Replies: @Aleatorius
  18. anon[152] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:

    Perhaps a modern day triumvirate could form to enable a better world for all. Imagine a western leader who works for his people and not the international grifters. One problem I see is that the titans are all in their seventies. Who will replace them? We know the American government is controlled by bribery and child porn blackmail. Will someone rise above the fray and clean house? As far as Putin, we better pray that whomever replaces him is wise and farsighted like he is, God forbid he is replaced by a sob who doesn’t play games. Xi is in a delicate position, imagine trying to feed one billion people every day. An interuption in energy supplies would throw their economy into chaos. We have a chance to create a better world if the big three would sit down and hash things out with candor and good will. Will the bastards let them? Don’t hold your breath. When I say the big three, I mean Trump, Putin and Xi. Not Obamas puppet.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Robert Bruce
  19. Agent76 says:

    May 17, 2024 Vladimir Putin and Xi Jingping Deepen Russian-Chinese Ties – May 2024 – English Subtitles

    Russian President Vladimir Putin travels to China for his first foreign state visit after re-inauguration to meet with Chinese President Xi Jingping and others Heads of State for a two-day state visit.


    Video Link

  20. Anon[418] •ï¿½Disclaimer says:

    Annd, a big fuck you to illegal CIA sanctions in breach of Charter Article 41:

    https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/issues/ucm/statements/20240517-eom-statement-sr-ucm-china.pdf

    With the USG castrated and disgraced, CIA will pull some sneaky coward ratfuck like the pipelines.

  21. Notsofast says:
    @xyzxy

    i see modi, in much the same light as erdogan, as they play both sides, to as much advantage as they can. what i do see however is a concerted effort by the west to promote indians and people of indian heritage into the zioneocon empire political puppets like sunak and nikki haley, to give the illusion of diversity to their genocidal “democracies”.

    modi’s not stupid and as the empires power and money wanes, they will replace them with brics partners. modi’s embracing of the u.s. military technologies will be remembered by the russians and i don’t think they will be as keen to share tech with them as they did with the brahmos hypersonic missiles. china has a very long memory as well and in the end modi’s duplicitous nature may come back to hurt them in the long run. putin and xi seem to have a genuine friendship and have built a strong partnership, based on mutual respect of their respective cultures and political systems.

    i think the u.s. also sees india, as a way to bring in stem educated grads that we no longer produce, that will replace older high salary workers, once again in the name of diversity.

  22. Notsofast says:
    @one nobody

    agree but if the ball and chain, is shackled to our ankle, when we jettison it, we will be dragged down as well. i guess we have it coming, for allowing it to happen (although no one ever asked me). a ball and chain on our ankle and a millstone around our neck, another fine mess “we’ve” gotten “ourselves” into. welcome to the united states of atlantis.

    •ï¿½Replies: @one nobody
  23. Priss Factor says: •ï¿½Website

    Yikes. She names the Jewish Power as the anti-Russian factor.


    Video Link

  24. The Jews have a facehugger vice grip on the “USA” and cherry-picked a bunch of Unruly Satanic Assholes, placed them in power, and commissioned them with one overall goal: to shit on the whole damn world — especially on Russia and China. “Russia and China” have almost become a single entity in the unruly satanic mind of The Jews, an entity which must be destroyed. Within this nightmarish vision that passes for “US foreign policy”, the Kaganites rule: Kaganism IS “US” foreign policy.

    Interestingly, “cagar” in Portuguese means “to shit”. And every time I read that word “Kagan” what goes through my head is this: “what kind of shit have the Alien Kagan been up to lately?” All the Kagans and their minions know how to do is that: taking a dump on the whole wide world, much like they did in the gene pool of America and the (ex-) White West in general. When all you’ve got are Kaganite Assholes running US foreign policy, everything looks like a toilet — so all the Kagans can do is shit on the world.

    To understand Kaganite Grand Strategy towards Russia and China, one thing that is helpful to keep in mind is this: projection. Not projection of power, mind you, but psychological projection. Why did the Jews called the Germans “uniquely evil”? Because the Jews always accuse others of their own crimes. Because the Jews accuse others of being what they themselves are. That’s how they come up with this shit: they know the Jews themselves are “uniquely evil” so they project that concept and apply it onto others, when they know full well that they should apply to themselves. That’s how it works. So let’s see how it works when a Kagan-Jew thinks about Russia and China:

    Russia: The Kremlin’s Many Revisions — FREDERICK W. KAGAN (2018)
    Russia is on a collision course with the West. … The sources of hostility are primarily within Russia. …Russia will remain hostile to and resentful of the West for some time to come, regardless of Western attempts at conciliation. This conflict is a crypto war, characterized by deception and self-deception, gray zones, and hybrid war, masking Russian cryptoimperialism. We must bring its sources out from the shadows and into the light before we can hope to meet its challenges. …

    The West cannot appease its way out of this crypto war. Putin requires conflict to justify his rule at home and his actions in the territory of the former Soviet Union. But Western appeasement cannot address problems that spring from deep within Russia itself. Putin is encouraging Russians to believe that they must regain suzerainty over their former empire, that they must weaken and fragment the West, that they must cut the United States down to size, and that the West will oppose them implacably in all these endeavors. Appeasement can only draw him into further demands, since he cannot allow the hostility to wane.

    Rise of the Revisionists: Russia, China, and Iran
    THE AEI PRESS – Publisher for the American Enterprise Institute

    Crypto?! Who are the Kings of Krypto, Kagan?!? Well, to understand what this Kaganite Jew full of crap really means, you must invert his words and apply it to his Kaganite ass. Only then do those projected words make any sense. Let’s try it and see if this new version isn’t much closer to reality:

    The United States is on a collision course with Russia. … The sources of hostility are primarily within The United States [the Jews]. …The United States [the Jews] will remain hostile to and resentful of the Russia for some time to come, regardless of Russian attempts at conciliation. This conflict is a [Jew] crypto war, characterized by [Jew] deception and [Jew] self-deception, gray zones, and hybrid war, masking the United States’ [the Jews`] cryptoimperialism. We must bring its sources out from the shadows and into the light before we can hope to meet its challenges. …

    Russia cannot appease its way out of this crypto war. Biden requires conflict to justify his rule at home and his actions within the “rules-based order”. But Russian appeasement cannot address problems that spring from deep within the United States itself [a Jew problem]. Biden is encouraging the Americans to believe that they must regain suzerainty over their former empire, that they must weaken and fragment Russia, that they must cut Russia down to size, and that Russia will oppose them implacably in all these endeavors. Appeasement can only draw Biden into further demands, since he cannot allow the hostility to wane.

    There, my fellow Unzers, I’ve just given you a key to unlock the satanic mind of the Jew and to figure out how to interpret US-Kaganite foreign policy: all you have to know is that the Jew-ruled “US” has completely absorbed the Jewish psychopathic mind-frame and will “project” onto other countries — Russia and China — whatever is going through this sick satanic Jew mind. To understand the US, then, all you have to do is read what the Jews write, invert the signs, and apply it to the JewSA itself. You will become a foreign policy expert in no time.

  25. @We are all Dumb

    You’re buying the coolaid, hope you don’t drink it.
    A “civil war” is the European Colonials’ only way to keep European capital from fleeing to the US.

    •ï¿½Replies: @We are all Dumb
  26. @Notsofast

    The US has shed the first millstone by winning its financial independance day last June.
    The US overnight lending rate is no longer set by the City of London. If you don’t believe it research it.
    The US has established the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR). The US no longer follows the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate or (LIBOR.)
    Did you think the New York Banks were just going to let the EU and their WEF establish the only World Central Bank to allocate capital?
    We are financially free lads from Euro banks and that 5% interest rate is killing LaGarde, Black Rock, Black Stone and all those WEF agents including Janet Yellin who keeps sending billions to Europe to shore up the Euro. Jerome Powell is not primaraly about inflation, it’s about making the Vandals pay for Ukraine and Wokeism financed by Covid free money and expose their frail Balance Sheets.
    All war is for economic reasons and finance is a weapon of choice, if we don’t look at this sector we will never understand the whole story. Also, if we don’t consider all vectors or the whole story, we won’t understand why European trolls, especially the English, always pop up and shout “America is getting into a civil war.” A civil war would suite them well, divide and conquer and with the Make Israel Great Again (MIGA) zionists in our midst, we have no short supply of Over-the-Cliffers.
    The danger is from within.

  27. @one nobody

    the US can begin paying its debts, reducing its taxes and building infrastructure to enhance the lives of its citizens and rebuild a well educated and competitive workforce

    The USA will never again have a “well educated and competitive work force” because the quality of the population in the USA is too low.

    •ï¿½Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  28. July, 14, 2023 — Some Chink Named Zhang Bangs On About The American Empire & NATO:

    The bloc, he added, portrays itself as the champion of the ‘rules-based international order,’ but “has repeatedly violated international law…, interfered in the internal affairs of other countries, provoked many wars, bombed diplomatic facilities, [and] killed innocent civilians.â€

    https://www.rt.com/news/579680-nato-troublemaker-china-un/

    I say:

    The only somewhat bright spot out of all that Balkan bombing done by the demonic, Jew-controlled American Empire in 1999 was the accidental pinpoint bombing of the Chinese embassy by some crazed CIA kook. US military might have been in on it too, but it’s fun to blame the CIA.

    If Osama’s compound close by the Pakistani military installation had been bombed from the air using planes and cruise missiles an accidental impact point might have been cooked up like the time where the Chinese embassy was “accidentally†bombed during the American Empire’s Balkan misadventure.

    This tall Chink guy Xi and his minions say that the JEW/WASP Ruling Class of the American Empire baited the Russkie bear in this nasty Ukraine proxy war business and I must say I agree with the Chink, and not just because I like chicken with broccoli and pork fried rice.

    AMERICAN EMPIRE OUT OF EUROPE AND ASIA

    NUKE WEAPONS FOR GERMANY AND ITALY

    NUKE WEAPONS FOR JAPAN AND AUSTRALIA

    NATO MUST BE TERMINATED WITH EXTREME PREJUDICE

    Tweet from 2022:

  29. Anynomous says:

    American and british have lost the war against both Russia and China and now they have to somehow spin it to their domestic citizen and make it seem like they didnt loose the war.

    Psyche of american and british will not be able to handle loosing a major war or loosing their power and their empire. All they care about is having power over others and having their empire.

  30. @Deep Thought

    “Dr. Amarjit Singh, Khalistan Affairs Center”

    Now who is this Paki? Is he related to Osama bin Laden? Why is he not in jail for being an asset of the Chinese security services? We need answers to avoid demise of China… please look in it and get back to US.

    Long live President Lai Ching-te and the Holy Dalai Lama!

    •ï¿½Replies: @Deep Thought
  31. Why does anyone both quoting the slimy lies of the Western MSM presstitute vermin? Any comic value wore away long ago, and nowadays it’s just a repetitive lesson in moral and intellectual villainy.

  32. @James of Africa

    did you used to live in china

    •ï¿½Troll: James of Africa
  33. @Hulkamania

    Yes, generations of debasing the populace in order to cement elite rule and out of contempt for working people, and to encourage and exploit the basest instincts through advertising and increasingly depraved popular ‘culture’, have created in the glorious West a social, moral and spiritual wasteland. The effects of highly partisan political divisions, meaningless in terms of real power, has worsened the decay.
    Russia and China must take every measure to ensure that their people are assisted in reaching the highest levels of personal and social intelligence, morality and spiritual understanding possible, and then the depraved West will never be able to infect them with ‘free market’ atomism and xenophobia, liberal fascist amorality or ‘conservative’ social atavism.

  34. @Aleatorius

    Deranged, lunatic, lying, fascistic, war-mongering Sinophobic racist. Lying comes so easily to these vermin. Good to see the ‘Manchuria’ insanity included. Plainly the offspring of a Japanese veteran of Unit 731 nostalgic for ‘Manchukuo’ and a salafist, Islamist, head-chopper from Xinjiang, Chinese since the Han dynasty.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Aleatorius
  35. One of the things that will happen as the satanic zio-west continues to collapse is that truth will emerge ref all the assassinations. Ref the attempted one in Slovakia, already the police get past the lone-gun nutter theory. It’s looking like official complicity … In Iran, Russia has promised appropriate detection equipment and personnel re the deadly helo crash.

    🇸🇰 A new twist in the case of the attempted assassination of the Slovak prime minister – the shooter was not a “lone wolf”. The investigation team announced by Slovakian Interior Minister Matúš Å utaj EÅ¡tok has found signs of conspiracy in the crime, The Asia Times writes.

    It turned out that two hours after the assassination attempt, all information from social networks and correspondence was deleted from the criminal’s home computer. He was not able to do this himself: he was arrested on the spot. Investigators found that Juraj Tsintula’s wife had not touched the computer.

    Those following the investigation already have a number of questions that need to be answered. For example, the assassination attempt took place on Wednesday last week, but the judge only authorised the police to search Tsintula’s apartment on Friday. Defence Minister and Deputy Prime Minister Robert Kalinak gave no explanation at the time.

    No ambulance was found at the scene. The attack took place far from the capital and there were no hospitals nearby. Fico had to be flown by helicopter to another city.

    He was then immediately loaded into an official car, even though his condition could have deteriorated if he had been seriously injured. No evacuation routes were marked at the scene.

    The equipment of the police in the motorcade was also inadequate. They were wearing street shoes instead of the army half boots required by regulations.

    The guards let Fico pass in front of them as the Prime Minister approached the cordon. This is also against the rules: the guards should have approached the cordon first.

    On the other side of the cordon, Slovak media reported, there were no guards to watch from behind or to blend in with the crowd.

    Experts estimate that it took three to four seconds for the five shots to be fired. No one intervened during that time. It was only when Cintula fired his shots that he was arrested by the police and security forces.

  36. @Arthur MacBride

    Already a trial has been held and sentence passed (bold). There are ongoing extensive investigations into other Donbass/Crimea war crimes and terror attacks like Crocus Hall and Kerch Bridge. Foreign agents maybe implicated.

    2ï¸âƒ£1ï¸âƒ£ May. Special military operation updates:

    â–ªï¸ About 40 per cent of Volchansk in Kharkov Region is under Russian control, the head of the Russian administration of the region, Ganchev, said.

    â–ªï¸ The rhythm of military supplies to Kiev, if restored, will not allow changing the dynamics on the fronts, Kremlin spokesman told reporters.

    â–ªï¸ The situation of Kiev’s forces on the fronts is unfavourable, the Ukrainian military is in a difficult situation, Kremlin spokesman added.

    â–ªï¸ Zelensky shouts at AFU generals out of fear that the truth about the situation on the front is being hidden from him, the Economist has reported, citing an anonymous Ukrainian official.

    â–ªï¸ AFU Brigadier General Andrei Gnatov has been sentenced in absentia in Russia for 28 years for crimes in Donbass in 2019, the Investigative Committee said.

    â–ªï¸ The EU has approved the use of proceeds from frozen assets of Russia’s Central Bank to help Ukraine, with 90 per cent of it going to assist the AFU.

    â–ªï¸ The US may announce a new military aid package for Ukraine this week, media reported citing US officials.

    â–ªï¸ Woman killed in AFU drone attack on car in Belgorod Oblast, three other people in the cabin wounded, Gladkov said.

    â–ªï¸ One person has been killed as a result of the AFU shelling of Donetsk, residential houses, shopping centres and infrastructure facilities have been damaged, the city mayor said.

  37. Victoria Nuland is a Neo-Conservative BOLSHEVIK JEW Baby Boomer harpy who would love to bomb and butcher grandmothers as they are baking apple pies and chocolate chip cookies for their very appreciative grandchildren. You know she would!

    Victoria Nuland is an evil, demonic BOLSHEVIK JEW who wants to exterminate all Russians and all Germans, and Victoria Nuland considers everywhere and anywhere to be a so-called “battlefield†to launch her murderous attacks and vicious schemes.

    This Baby Boomer JEW BOLSHEVIK Bitch Victoria Nuland is a bloodthirsty, demonic harridan harpy who laughs and cackles as the body count rises from her evil plots. If Victoria Nuland offers you cookies, politely refuse them!

    Victoria Nuland is not a nice person! Nope!

    The Biden administration is infested with evil and immoral Jews of a most treasonous sort, and these Jews Organized Globally(JOG) Biden Bolshevik Jews(BBJ) are using their power to attack and destroy the European Christian ancestral core of the USA.

    Biden’s BOLSHEVIK JEW RATS would love to use the US military to bomb and murder tens of millions of European Christians, just like they are bombing and killing and burning and butchering and flattening all the Gaza Palestinians. Biden’s JEW BOLSHEVIKS are enemies of the European Christian ancestral core of the USA.

  38. annamaria says:
    @ltlee

    Would not it be logical to airlift Blinken and Nuland to Ukraine and parachute them on the frontline? Nuland has adult children who should join their aggressively militant mommy on the frontline.

    The Kagans’ clan (Nuland is married into the clan) has been the most active in promoting wars and regime changes/civil wars in the Middle East and Eastern Europe. Hopefully, these mega-criminals will answer for their crimes against humanity, and their progeny will become totally impoverished by paying reparations to the many victims of the Kagans’ clan crimes.

    •ï¿½Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  39. @Anynomous

    It is a matter of personal transfer.
    The CIA and the US Navy know they can’t beat us and Russia, but they want to make money in the name of beating us.

  40. @Aleatorius

    In consideration of the daily entertainment you provide me, I invite you,Aleatorius,to translate the following:
    你就是个å°ä¸‘,你知é“å—?

    •ï¿½Replies: @Aleatorius
  41. @mulga mumblebrain

    “Chinese since the Han dynasty.”

    Han dynasty is dead and long gone… it’s high time for China to give up the illegally occupied territories back to the natives. As a member of the UNSC, it must act responsibly lest the seat is returned to Taiwan.

  42. @Aleatorius

    More or less CONTINUALLY since the Han, racist shit for brains (apologies to shit). The Uighurs arrived in the Tarim Basin in the 9th century CE, and did not converted to Islam (let alone Wahhabist salafism) until after the 10th century. The efforts by evil, racist, vermin like you to stir up trouble, death, suffering, destruction and misery in multi-ethnic states is PURE EVIL.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Aleatorius
  43. @annamaria

    The Kagan Nudelmans exemplify that hatred and rage that the worst of the Jews manifest over and over again, throughout history. Look at the sow-hatred and rage has pickled her like a sour Japanese plum. The boar has simply internalised the hate and malice and grown bloated like a furuncle about to dehisce.

  44. @Arthur MacBride

    It looks like a set-up involving his bodyguards to me, just like JFK. They’ll be keen to finish the job, now. The EU is reverting to type-fascism, ie corporate and State power amalgamated.

  45. @anon

    Trump is a grifter and can’t be taken seriously after his presidential performance. He cucked, simple as that or he was/is false opposition. He talks and talks and talks a good game, but come time to well perform, he caves. The guy was bankrupt 6 times and 4 of those Chase Manhattan and co. bailed him out. He is owned, plain and simple.

  46. @mulga mumblebrain

    “The efforts by evil, racist, vermin like you…”

    Funny, it takes one to know one. Welcome to the “PURE EVIL” group!

  47. @Aleatorius

    ..to give up the illegally occupied territories back to the natives.

    That will come one day:

    24 June 1995
    .
    The Editor
    South China Morning Post
    GPO Box 47
    Hong Kong

    .
    Sir,
    .
    I applaud your editorial of 22 June, in which you exposed the insidious manner in which the Japanese parliament and government had glossed over the crimes and genocides the Japanese Imperial Army had committed against the peoples of East Asia.
    .
    Your effort is to be commended and I hope you will extend it and apply it in an impartial and unbiased manner.
    .
    The crimes of Japan during World War II is but one of the crimes against humanity in recent history and it is not even the most serious.
    .
    Far more sinister are those committed by the whites against the non-whites, with the racial genocides carried out in America and Australia being the most systematic and thorough.
    .
    These are the most hideous crimes against humanity- surpassing, in scale and thoroughness, even Hitler’s organized pogrom of the Jews and the Slavs. But while the whites react with anger and indignation to the massacres of their own kind, they continue to glorify and celebrate their genocidal achievements when their victims are non-Europeans.
    .
    We all should now wake up to the fact that the regimes thus established are illegal, immoral and illegitimate. For the sake of justice and legality, these criminal regimes must be abolished. Only then can a just “New World Order” prevail.
    .
    The South China Morning Post, having so bravely exposed the lies and deceit of the Japanese, should now take up this new task with added courage and vigour, and thus set a moral journalistic standard for the rest of the “Free Press” to follow.
    .
    Sincerely
    .
    **Censored by “The Free Press”, Refused publication**
    .

  48. @迪路

    I am not translating anything which looks like chicken shit… I ain’t no goddanmed chinaman!

  49. @Deep Thought

    “Let Khalistan join Pakistan…”

    Pakistan is Khalistan so there’s nothing to join. It’s already joined and all Khalistanis need to move there from Canada and US.

    Long live President Lai and the Holy Lama!

  50. .. need to move there from Canada and US.

    So do the Amelikans back to Eurostan!

  51. @one nobody

    You specifically said america has to pay its debts. No we should pay no debts because all the debt is to our Jewish and anglo oligarchs. The entire financial system is money laundering operation.

  52. ltlee says:
    @Aleatorius

    Actually Taiwan was taken from the Dutch occupiers by Zheng Chenggong. He was and is revered by the Taiwan people who called him Koxinga. Koxinga literally means the Lord with the name of the Ming Dynasty. And Koxinga’s birthday is stilled celebrated nowadays in Taiwan and in part of China’s Fujian Province.

    But the people who identified themselves as Taiwanese today are not indigenous to Taiwan. They are Han Chinese. Feel free to tell Lai Ching Te to give Taiwan back to indigenous Taiwanese.

    •ï¿½Replies: @Aleatorius
  53. @ltlee

    “Feel free to tell Lai Ching Te to give Taiwan back to indigenous Taiwanese.”

    Once the Kuomintang takes back the Maoist China from the godforsaken commies with the blessing from the heavenly Doctor Sun Yat Sen, they will return Formosa back to its original inhabitants… it would be the right thing to do!

  54. @one nobody

    Excellent analysis One Nobody

  55. @James of Africa

    Like Niger and other Sahel countries, S Africa should kick out DeBeers and other western exploiters. I think it’s the only option to freedom.

    •ï¿½Replies: @James of Africa
  56. AA says:

    2024 is today! Xi and Put are working on the 22nd Century, not the 21st. At the same time the US “is working” on the election of a person lasting for 4 years. “We lost the West – We discovered the rest,” said Dugin in beautiful English at the YT. Find it youself.

  57. @Rev. Spooner

    You’re dealing with the ANC, they have a saying: “The comrades must eat”. Meaning that the politicians, the big men must profit, or no deal. Any other consideration is of secondary importance to them. Another ANC-ism: He/she/they/whoever did not join the struggle to be poor.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


�Remember My InformationWhy?
�Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Patrick Lawrence Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World