æ¥æ¬æ¿åºã¨æ¬§å·é£åï¼EUï¼ã¯17æ¥ãæ¥æ¬§éã§å人æ å ±ãç¸äºã«ç§»è»¢ããæ çµã¿ãä½ããã¨ã§æçµåæãããåæ¥ã«ç½²åå¼ãéããæ¥æ¬§çµæ¸é£æºåå®ï¼EPAï¼ã§æ¥æ¬§éã®ãã¸ãã¹ãæ´»çºã«ãªããã¨ã«åããæ¥æ¬§ä¼æ¥ãå¾æ¥å¡ã顧客ã®æ å ±ãå®å ¨ã«ç§»è»¢ãããããæ çµã¿ãä½ããä»ç§ã¾ã§ã«åæ¹ãå½å æç¶ããçµããæ çµã¿ãçºå¹ãããã17æ¥åå¾ã«å人æ å ±ä¿è·å§å¡ä¼ã®çæ²¢æ¥é½å§å¡ã¨ã欧å·å§å¡ä¼ã®ã¨ã¦ããã¼å§å¡ãé»è©±ããæçµå
ï¼´ï¼°ï¼°ã«æ¯ã¹ã¦ããæ¥æ¬§ï¼¥ï¼°ï¼¡ã¯ã¾ã ãã·ã¨ãããã¨ã¯ãªãã ãããï¼ãã¨ããè¨èãï¼´ï¼°ï¼°å対éåã®ä¸ã§ããæã«èããªã訳ã§ã¯ãªããé£ã®å®å ¨ãæè³å®¶å¯¾å½å®¶éç´äºå¦çãåç©ç¦ç¥çã ãä¸æ¹ï¼¥ï¼µã®å対éåããã¯ããçµå±ã°ãï¼ãã«ä¼æ¥ã®æå³ãåæ ããããã®ãã¨ãã声ãèããã¦æ¥ãã ï¼æ29æ¥ã«ãçè ãåå ãã¦ãããï¼´ï¼°ï¼°ãã©ã¹ã許ããªãï¼å ¨å½å ±åè¡åããå¼ã³ããã¦ãå¦ç¿ä¼ãåæ¥ç¶ãã¦å¤åã»è¾²æ°´ã»å é£åºããï¼åã®åºå¸ãå¾ã¦æ¥æ¬§ï¼¥ï¼°ï¼¡ã®èª¬æã¨æè¦äº¤æä¼ããã£ããï¼æ10æ¥ã«ç¶ãï¼åç®ã®åãçµã¿ã ã ãã®å¦ç¿ä¼ã®å ±åè ã®ä¸äººã¨ãã¦ãå ¬å ±èª¿éããå½æä¼æ¥ããè¦å¶ã®ååãã«ã¤ãã¦ã®åæãå ±åãããä»ã«ï¼äººããé£ã®å®å ¨ããè¾²ææ°´ç£åã®å¸å ´ã¢ã¯ã»ã¹ãã«ã¤ãã¦å ±åãããã âæ¥æ¬§ï¼¥ï¼°ï¼¡ã¯ãä¸è¦ãã·ã®ããã ãçµå±ã¯æ´ã«æªããåå®ã æ¥æ¬§ï¼¥ï¼°ï¼¡ã¯æªã 決çãã¦ãã訳ã§ã¯ãªããä¸è¿°ã®åæããEUã»æ¥æ¬ãå ¬è¡¨ãããã¡ã¯ãã·ï¼ã
Populist movements in the US and Europe have mounted an attack on economic globalization. Their responses to more than a half-century of globalization include leaving multilateral trading blocs, imposing steep unilateral tariffs and striving for balanced bilateral trade. Trade theory suggests that this rejection of todayâs open trade regime will impose costs on globalized economies. But using the
ä»è¨æå½ä¼æ大ã®ç¦ç¹ã¨ãããããï¼´ï¼°ï¼°ã®æ¿èªæ¡ã¨é¢é£æ³æ¡ã10æ14æ¥ãè¡é¢ï¼´ï¼°ï¼°ç¹å¥å§å¡ä¼ã§å¯©è°å ¥ããããå®åé¦ç¸ã¯ä»é±28æ¥ã¾ã§ã«è¡é¢ãééããããã¨ãçã£ã¦ãããåé¢ã§ã®å¯©è°ãé ãã¦ã11æ30æ¥ã®ä¼ææ«ã¾ã§ã«èªç¶æç«ããããã ãé大ãªå±é¢ã«ããTPP審è°ã«ã¤ãã¦ãæ°èåç´ããããªãè¦è§£ã示ãã¦ãããã社説ããæ¤è¨ããã岡山çç«å³æ¸é¤¨ã«ããå°æ¹ç´29ç´ã¨å ¨å½ç´ï¼ç´ãé²è¦§ããçµæãé¢é£å 容ã確èªã§ããã®ã¯å ¨å½ï¼ç´ï¼ç£çµãèªå£²ï¼ãå°æ¹15ç´ï¼æ±äº¬ãåæ¥æ¬ã西æ¥æ¬ãæ²³åæ°å ±ãååãççæ°å ±ãçæ¬æ¥æ¥ãå±±é°ä¸å¤®æ°å ±ãæ¥æ¬æµ·ãåæµ·éãè¨åãæ°æ½æ¥å ±ãä¸éãç¥æ¸ã岩ææ¥å ±ï¼ã§ãã£ãã âè³æ¬ä¸»ç¾©çµæ¸ã¯èªç¸èªç¸ï¼ãããããã°ãï¼ã«é¥ã£ã¦ãã å ¨å½2ç´ã¯æ©ææ¹åãæ±ãã¦ããã ã¾ãç£çµã¯ããä¸éå ã¨ãã«é«æ°´æºã®å½ç£ç±³ä¾¡æ ¼ã®ç¶æã°ããã«ç®ãåãããï¼´ï¼°ï¼°ãæ¶è²»è ã«ããããæ©æµãªã©ç¼ä¸ã«ãªãã®ããã¨ãæ¶
Martin Sandbu of the Financial Times has a very thoughtful discussion of my globalization trilemma, as it applies to Brexit among other things. Sandbu argues that âthinking critically about Rodrikâs trilemma should lead us to more optimistic conclusions.â I largely agree with Sandbuâs points, but I thought it would be useful to state some of my reactions in the interest of clarifying the issues. H
This comic about the Trans-Pacific Partnership was originally published in early 2014, when the full text of the agreement hadnât been released; the final text was more or less what was expected (slightly better in some parts, worse in others). But in any case, the TPP is dead. However, it turns out that investor-state dispute settlement is far worse than I knew at the time; check out an in-depth
æ°ããã°ä½æãã¾ããâå½åæéå½ããã°ã¨åææ´æ°ãç¶ãã¾ãããä¸å®æéçµéå¾ãæ°ããã°ãã¡ã¤ã³ã§ä½¿ç¨ãã¾ã http://ameblo.jp/kattann2525 ç¾å¨ãè©è«å®¶å¤è°·çµè¡¡æ°ãåå±±æºæ°çãä¸å¿ã¨ããè¨è«äººã°ã«ã¼ãã¨ä¿äºä¸ã§ãã 横æµéè¡ã横æµè¥èå°æ¯åº åºçªå·ãï¼ï¼ï¼ãæ®éé éå£åº§çªå·ãï¼ï¼ï¼ï¼ï¼ï¼ï¼ ã¿ã«ã®ã«ããã· å¤é¡ã®å¼è·å£«è²»ç¨ã¨ãããã¾ãã®ã§ãã©ããããããããããã°ãæ¯æ´ã®æ¹ãããããé¡ããã¾ãm(_ _)m << éè¨ï½ä½ã®ããã®æ¿æ²»è¨è«ãï¼ï½ | TOP | KAZUYA信è ã¯æèåæ¢éå£ï¼ï¼ >> ãã¼ãæè¿ã§ã¯å®åæ¿æ¨©ã®ç§»æ°åãå ¥ãæ¿çãåé¡ã«ãªã£ã¦ãã¾ãããä¸é¨ã®å®åæ¯æè ãã¡ã®éã§ã¯ã移æ°åé¡ã¨å¤å½äººå´åè åå ¥ãã¯éãï¼ï¼ãã¨çºè¨ãã人ã大å¤å¤ãã§ãã å¤å½äººåãå ¥ãæéãï¼å¹´å»¶é·ã建è¨æ¥ã®äººæä¸è¶³å¯¾çããï¼æ¥æ¬çµæ¸æ°è http://t.co/bXcH
ï¼»ã¯ã·ã³ãã³ï¼ã¢ãã©ã³ã¿ãï¼æ¥ããã¤ã¿ã¼ï¼½ - ç°å¤ªå¹³æ´çµæ¸é£æºåå®ï¼ï¼´ï¼°ï¼°ï¼äº¤æ¸ã«åå ããæ¥ç±³ãå«ãï¼ï¼ã«å½ã¯ï¼æ¥ãç±³ã¸ã§ã¼ã¸ã¢å·ã¢ãã©ã³ã¿ã§éãã¦ããé£åä¼åã§å¤§çåæã«éãããï¼ï¼ã«å½ã¯çºæ¿ãªã©å¹ åºãçµæ¸åé¡ã§ååãã¦ããã¨è¡¨æãä¸ççµæ¸ã®ï¼ï¼ï¼ ãå ãã巨大ãªèªç±è²¿æåã®èªçã«åãåé²ããã
ãã¯ã¤ã§éããã¦ããï¼´ï¼°ï¼°ï¼ç°å¤ªå¹³æ´ãã¼ããã¼ã·ããåå®ã®é¦å¸äº¤æ¸å®ä¼åã§ãåå åå½ã¯ãæµ·å¤ã«é²åºãã¦æ害ãåããä¼æ¥ããå½éçãªä»²è£æ©é¢ã«è¨´è¨ãèµ·ãããISDSãæ¡é ã«ã¤ãã¦ãå°å ¥ããæ¹åã§æçµèª¿æ´ã«å ¥ãæ¹éã確èªãã¾ããã ï¼æ¥ç®ã®ï¼ï¼æ¥ã®åè°ã§ã¯ãæµ·å¤ã«é²åºããä¼æ¥ããç¸æå½ã®æ¥ãªå¶åº¦å¤æ´ãªã©ã«ãã£ã¦æ害ãåããå ´åã«ãå½éçãªä»²è£æ©é¢ã«è¨´è¨ãèµ·ããããããããISDSãæ¡é ã¨å¼ã°ããå¶åº¦ã®åãæ±ãã«ã¤ãã¦åè°ãã¾ããã ãã®å¶åº¦ãå·¡ã£ã¦ã¯ãä¼æ¥ã®æµ·å¤é²åºã«ç©æ¥µçãªã¢ã¡ãªã«ãæ¥æ¬ãå°å ¥ãæ±ããä¸æ¹ãéå»ã«è¨´è¨ã§å¤é¡ã®è³ åéã®æ¯æããå½ããããã¨ãã¦ããªã¼ã¹ãã©ãªã¢ãä¸é¨ã®æ°èå½ãæ éãªå§¿å¢ã示ããåè°ãé£èªãã¦ãã¾ããã ãããããªããåå åå½ã¯ãå°å ¥ã«æ éãªå½ã«é æ ®ããå½¢ã§ãæ確ãªæ ¹æ ã®ãªã訴ãã¯éããã«å´ä¸ãããã¨ãã訴ããããæéãä¸å®ã®å¹´æ°ã«å¶éãããã¨ãªã©ãä¹±ç¨ãé²ãè¦å®ã
Naturally, tobacco companies hated the law. And they found a surprising way to fight back: They persuaded governments in Honduras, Indonesia, and other countries to file complaints with the World Trade Organization, alleging that the new regulations violated global trade rules. The cases are ongoing, and we don't know how the WTO will rule. But this dispute comes up over and over again in debates
ã©ã³ãã³ã°
ã©ã³ãã³ã°
ãç¥ãã
ãªãªã¼ã¹ãé害æ å ±ãªã©ã®ãµã¼ãã¹ã®ãç¥ãã
ææ°ã®äººæ°ã¨ã³ããªã¼ã®é ä¿¡
å¦çãå®è¡ä¸ã§ã
j次ã®ããã¯ãã¼ã¯
kåã®ããã¯ãã¼ã¯
lãã¨ã§èªã
eã³ã¡ã³ãä¸è¦§ãéã
oãã¼ã¸ãéã
{{#tags}}- {{label}}
{{/tags}}