ANNOTATIONS For Teachers I - III

RESULTS-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (RPMS)

For Teachers I – III - ANNOTATIONS

KRA 1: CONTENT KNOWLEDGE AND PEDAGOGY

OBJECTIVE 1: Applied knowledge of content within and across curriculum teaching

areas (PPST 1.1.2)
MOVs: Attach your Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet or inter-observer
agreement form from an observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-
person classroom observation
ANNOTATION:
Rating of 7 in COT – Outstanding
For KRA 1 - Objective 1, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT)

rating sheet from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person
classroom observation. I applied high level knowledge of content and pedagogy
within and across curriculum teaching areas to create a conducive learning
environment that enables an in-depth and sophisticated understanding of the
teaching and learning process to meet individual/group learning needs. It is evident
that I have met the objective, as shown by a rating of 7 under Indicator 1 – Applied
knowledge of content within and across curriculum teaching areas. This is equivalent
to 5 points (Outstanding) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
Rating of 6 in COT – Very Satisfactory

classroom observation. When delivering the lesson, I demonstrated accurate, in-
depth and broad knowledge of concepts in presenting the lesson, and in responding
to learners’ questions in a manner that is responsive to learners’ developmental needs.
It is evident that I have met the objective, as shown by a rating of 6 under Indicator 1 –
Applied knowledge of content within and across curriculum teaching areas. This is
equivalent to 4 points (Very Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
Rating of 5 in COT – Satisfactory

classroom observation. When delivering the lesson, I demonstrated accurate, in-
depth and broad knowledge of concepts in presenting the lesson, and in responding
to learners’ questions in a manner that attempts to be responsive to pupils
developmental learning needs. It is evident that I have met the objective, as shown
by a rating of 5 under Indicator 1 – Applied knowledge of content within and across
curriculum teaching areas. This is equivalent to 3 points (Very Satisfactory) in the RPMS
Rating Scale.
Rating of 4 in COT – Unsatisfactory

classroom observation. When delivering the lesson, I demonstrated accurate
knowledge of key concepts both in presentation of the lesson and in responding to
learners’ questions and reacting to questions or comments. It is evident that I have
met the objective, as shown by a rating of 4 under Indicator 1 – Applied knowledge of
content within and across curriculum teaching areas. This is equivalent to 2 points
(Unsatisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
OBJECTIVE 2: Used a range of teaching strategies that enhance learner achievement

in literacy and numeracy skills (PPST 1.4.2)
ANNOTATION:
Rating of 7 in COT - Outstanding

classroom observation. When delivering the lesson, I integrated well connected
teaching strategies that promote individual/group learners’ critical literacy and/or
critical numeracy skills. Since I was able to meet the objective, a rating of 7 under
Indicator 2 – Uses a range of teaching strategies that enhance learner achievement in
literacy and numeracy skills, which is equivalent to 5 points (Outstanding) in the RPMS
Rating Scale where given.
Rating of 6 in COT – Very Satisfactory

classroom observation. When delivering the lesson, I consistently applied relevant
strategies that enhance learners’ literacy and/or numeracy skills in all aspects of the
lesson. A rating of 6 under Indicator 2 – Uses a range of teaching strategies that
enhance learner achievement in literacy and numeracy skills, which is equivalent to 4
points (Very Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale where given.
Rating of 5 in COT – Satisfactory

classroom observation. When delivering the lesson, I frequently applied relevant
strategies that enhance learners’ literacy and/or numeracy skills in my lesson. A rating
of 5 under Indicator 2 – Uses a range of teaching strategies that enhance learner
achievement in literacy and numeracy skills, which is equivalent to 3 points
(Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale where given.
Rating of 4 in COT – Unsatisfactory

classroom observation. In some parts of my lesson, I provided activities which address
learners’ literacy and/or numeracy needs but I failed to do so in some critical parts of
the lesson where either or both skills are necessary. A rating of 4 under Indicator 2 –
Uses a range of teaching strategies that enhance learner achievement in literacy and
numeracy skills, which is equivalent to 2 points (Very Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating
Scale where given.
OBJECTIVE 3: Applied a range of teaching strategies to develop critical and creative

thinking, as well as other higher-order thinking skills (PPST 1.5.2)
ANNOTATION:
Rating of 7 - Outstanding

classroom observation. I provided a broad range of questions and activities,
including those of higher-order that challenges learners to analyze their thinking to
promote deeper understanding. I clearly fulfilled the goal, as evidenced by a rating of
7 under Indicator 3 – Applied a range of teaching strategies to develop critical and
creative thinking, as well as other higher-order thinking skills. This is equivalent to 5
points (Outstanding) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
Rating of 6 – Very Satisfactory

classroom observation. Using a well-directed questions and activities, I challenged
learners to justify their thinking and successfully engaged most of them during the
teaching and learning process. It is evidenced by a rating of 6 under Indicator 3 –
Applied a range of teaching strategies to develop critical and creative thinking, as
well as other higher-order thinking skills which is equivalent to 4 points (Very
Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
Rating of 5 – Satisfactory

classroom observation. I employed range of teaching strategies to ensure that most
learners are given opportunities to give their opinions/ideas about the lesson and to
react to the opinions of their classmates. A rating of 5 under Indicator 3 – Applied a
range of teaching strategies to develop critical and creative thinking, as well as other
higher-order thinking skills which is equivalent to 3 points (Satisfactory) in the RPMS
Rating Scale were given.
Rating of 4 – Unsatisfactory

classroom observation. In delivering the lesson, I personally asks questions and
provided activities that mostly require learners to interpret, explain or just describe
ideas they have learned. A rating of 4 under Indicator 3 – Applied a range of teaching
strategies to develop critical and creative thinking, as well as other higher-order
thinking skills which is equivalent to 2 points (Unsatisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale
were given.
KRA 2: LEARNING ENVIRONMENT & DIVERSITY OF LEARNERS
OBJECTIVE 4: Managed classroom structure to engage learners, individually or in

groups, in meaningful exploration, discovery and hands-on activities within a range of
physical environments (PPST 2.3.2)
ANNOTATION:

classroom observation. During classroom observation, I organized and maintained
classroom structure and engaged learners individually/in groups, in meaningful
exploration, discovery and hands-on learning activities within a range of physical
learning environments. A pro-active classroom structure management practices to
support flexible movement of the learners management practices to support flexible
movement of the learners during group activities were evident. As demonstrated by a
score of 7 on Indicator 4, I certainly met the objective – Managed classroom structure
to engage learners, individually or in groups, in meaningful exploration, discovery and
hands-on activities within a range of physical environments. This is equivalent to 5

classroom observation. During classroom observation, all learners were able to work
productively within the allotted time, physical space and resources. I managed to let
pupils be engaged in meaningful exploration, discovery and hands-on learning
activities. As demonstrated by a score of 6 on Indicator 4, I certainly met the
objective – Managed classroom structure to engage learners, individually or in groups,
in meaningful exploration, discovery and hands-on activities within a range of physical
environments. This is equivalent to 4 points (Very Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
Rating of 5 - Satisfactory

classroom observation. During classroom observation, it is evident that most learners
work productively within allotted time, physical space and resources. A score of 5 on
Indicator 4, I certainly met the objective – Managed classroom structure to engage
learners, individually or in groups, in meaningful exploration, discovery and hands-on
activities within a range of physical environments. This is equivalent to 3 points
(Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
Rating of 4 - Unsatisfactory

classroom observation. Classroom layout is simple and somewhat suitable for
different learning activities. A score of 4 on Indicator 4, – Managed classroom
structure to engage learners, individually or in groups, in meaningful exploration,
discovery and hands-on activities within a range of physical environments were given.
This is equivalent to 2 points (Unsatisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
OBJECTIVE 5: Managed learner behavior constructively by applying positive and non-

violent discipline to ensure learning-focused environments (PPST 2.6.2)
ANNOTATION:

classroom observation. I constructively managed learner behavior by applying
positive and non-violent discipline to ensure a learning-focused environment. The fact
that I received a rating of 7 on Indicator 5 indicates that I achieved the goal. –
Managed learner behavior constructively by applying positive and non-violent
discipline to ensure learning-focused environments. This is equivalent to 5 points
(Outstanding) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
For KRA 2 - Objective 5, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating
sheet from an Observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-face/in-person
classroom observation. I responded appropriately to the misbehavior of my learners
at all times without any loss of instructional time. A rating of 6 on Indicator 5 indicates
that I achieved the goal. – Managed learner behavior constructively by applying
positive and non-violent discipline to ensure learning-focused environments. This is
equivalent to 4 points (Very Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
classroom observation. I frequently manages learners behavior against established
rules of conduct and most of learners follow such. A rating of 5 on Indicator 5 –
Managed learner behavior constructively by applying positive and non-violent
discipline to ensure learning-focused environments were given. This is equivalent to 3
points (Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
classroom observation. During classroom observation I occasionally managed
misbehavior of my pupils against established rules of conduct and majority of them
follow such rules. A rating of 4 on Indicator 5 – Managed learner behavior
constructively by applying positive and non-violent discipline to ensure learning-
focused environments were given. This is equivalent to 2 points (Unsatisfactory) in the
RPMS Rating Scale.
OBJECTIVE 6: Used differentiated developmentally appropriate learning experiences

to address learners’ gender, needs, strengths, interests and experiences (PPST 3.1.2)
ANNOTATION:

classroom observation. During classroom observation, differentiated and
developmentally appropriate learning experiences to address the diverse learning
needs were evident. As indicated, I received a rating of 7 on Indicator – Used
differentiated developmentally appropriate learning experiences to address learners’
gender, needs, strengths, interests and experiences This is equivalent to 5 points

classroom observation. During the delivery of lesson, differentiated strategies that
motivate and engage group of learners at their cognitive levels, allowing them to
achieve the learning outcomes were provided. A rating of 6 on Indicator 6 – Used
differentiated developmentally appropriate learning experiences to address learners’
gender, needs, strengths, interests and experiences were given. This is equivalent to 4
points (Very Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

developmentally appropriate learning experiences to address the diverse learning
needs were evident. A rating of 5 on Indicator 6 – Used differentiated
developmentally appropriate learning experiences to address learners’ gender,
needs, strengths, interests and experiences were given. This is equivalent to 3 points

developmentally appropriate learning experiences to address the learning needs for
most were evident. A rating of 4 on Indicator 6 – Used differentiated developmentally
appropriate learning experiences to address learners’ gender, needs, strengths,
interests and experiences were given. This is equivalent to 2 points (Unsatisfactory) in
the RPMS Rating Scale.
KRA 3: Curriculum and Planning
OBJECTIVE 7: Planned, managed, implemented developmentally sequenced

teaching and learning processes to meet curriculum requirements and varied
teaching contexts (PPST 4.1.2)
ANNOTATION:

classroom observation. As a teacher, I managed well structured lessons with emphasis
on explicit connections between previous learning and new concepts and skills. The fact
that I received a rating of 7 on Indicator 7 indicates that I achieved the goal. –
Planned, managed, implemented developmentally sequenced teaching and learning
processes to meet curriculum requirements and varied teaching contexts. This is
equivalent to 5 points (Outstanding) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

classroom observation. During the delivery of lesson, the sequenced of activities
purposely scaffolds learners toward achieving the lesson’s objectives. A rating of 6 on
Indicator 7 indicates that I achieved the goal. – Planned, managed, implemented
developmentally sequenced teaching and learning processes to meet curriculum
requirements and varied teaching contexts. This is equivalent to 4 points (Very

classroom observation. During the delivery of lesson, I managed to implement lessons
with appropriate elements of developmentally sequenced teaching and learning
processes. A rating of 5 on Indicator 7 indicates that I achieved the goal. – Planned,
managed, implemented developmentally sequenced teaching and learning
processes to meet curriculum requirements and varied teaching contexts. This is
equivalent to 3 points (Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.

classroom observation. During the delivery of lesson, I was not able to demonstrate
understanding of the pre-requisite relationships when planning and there where some
problems with the lesson strategies that negatively impacted learning. A rating of 4 on
Indicator 7 – Planned, managed, implemented developmentally sequenced teaching
and learning processes to meet curriculum requirements and varied teaching contexts
were given. This is equivalent to 2 points (Unsatisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
OBJECTIVE 8: Participated in collegial discussions that use teacher and learner
feedback to enrich teaching practice (PPST 4.4.2)
MOVs:
1. Proof/s of attendance in LAC sessions/FGDs/meetings/other collegial discussions
2. Minutes of LAC sessions/FGDs/meetings/other collegial discussions on use of

teacher and learner feedback to enrich teaching practice
3. Reflection Notes of teachers on their demonstration of teaching practices following

participation from LAC sessions/FGDs/meetings/other collegial discussions that use
teacher and learner feedback to enrich teaching practice with proof of attendance
4. Any equivalent form/document that highlights the objective
ANNOTATION:
For KRA 3 - Objective 8, I have attached reflection notes on the demonstration

of teaching practices following my participation from collegial discussions that
discusses teacher and learner feedback across 4 quarters. The fact that I gained a
rating 7 on Indicator 8 implies that I accomplished the objective – Participated in
collegial discussions that use teacher and learner feedback to enrich teaching
practice. This is equivalent to 5 points (Outstanding) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
For KRA 3 - Objective 8, I have attached reflection notes on the demonstration

of teaching practices following my participation from collegial discussions that
discusses teacher and learner feedback across 3 quarters. A rating of 6 on Indicator 8
– Participated in collegial discussions that use teacher and learner feedback to enrich
teaching practice were given. This is equivalent to 4 points (Very Satisfactory) in the
RPMS Rating Scale.
For KRA 2 - Objective 8, I have attached minutes of collegial discussions

attended following my participation that discusses teacher and learner feedback
across 2 quarters. A rating of 5 on Indicator 8 – Participated in collegial discussions
that use teacher and learner feedback to enrich teaching practice were given. This is
equivalent to 3 points (Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
For KRA 2 - Objective 8, I attended collegial discussions that discuss

teacher/learner feedback to enrich instruction with proof of attendance following my
participation in 1 quarter only. A rating of 2 on Indicator 8 – Participated in collegial
discussions that use teacher and learner feedback to enrich teaching practice were
given. This is equivalent to 2 points (Unsatisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
OBJECTIVE 9: Selected, developed, organized, and used appropriate teaching and
learning resources including ICT, to address learning goals (PPST 4.5.2)
MOVs:
SET A as Option - Attach your Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet or inter-
observer agreement form from an observation 1 and 2 done through onsite/face-to-
face/in-person classroom observation
ANNOTATION:

classroom observation. I was able integrate extensive and multi-disciplinary learning
resources, including ICT, which are appropriate and aligned with the learning goals.
As a result, I obtained a rating of 7 on Indicator 9 which signifies that I attained the
objective – Selected, developed, organized, and used appropriate teaching and
learning resources including ICT, to address learning goals. This is equivalent to 5

classroom observation. During classroom observation, learning resources, including
ICT, which are consistently aligned with the learning goals were utilized. As a result, I
obtained a rating of 6 on Indicator 9 which signifies that I attained the objective –
Selected, developed, organized, and used appropriate teaching and learning
resources including ICT, to address learning goals. This is equivalent to 4 points (Very

classroom observation. During classroom observation, learning resources, including
ICT, which are generally aligned with the learning goals were utilized. As a result, I
obtained a rating of 6 on Indicator 9 which signifies that I attained the objective –
Selected, developed, organized, and used appropriate teaching and learning
resources including ICT, to address learning goals. This is equivalent to 3 points

classroom observation. During classroom observation, instructional materials and
resources are incompletely aligned with the instructional purposes. A rating of 4 on
Indicator 9 – Selected, developed, organized, and used appropriate teaching and
learning resources including ICT, to address learning goals were given. This is
equivalent to 2 points (Unsatisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
KRA 4: ASSESSMENT AND REPORTING
OBJECTIVE 10: Designed, selected, organized and used diagnostic, formative and
summative assessment strategies consistent with curriculum requirements (PPST 5.1.2)
ANNOTATION:
classroom observation. During classroom observation, assessment strategies which
engage learners to monitor and reflect on their own progress were evident. As
indicated, I received a rating of 7 on Indicator – Designed, selected, organized and
used diagnostic, formative and summative assessment strategies consistent with
curriculum requirements This is equivalent to 5 points (Outstanding) in the RPMS Rating
Scale.
classroom observation. During classroom observation, learners were encouraged to
assess and monitor the quality of their work against the assessment criteria and
performance standards. As indicated, I received a rating of 6 on Indicator 10 –
Designed, selected, organized and used diagnostic, formative and summative
assessment strategies consistent with curriculum requirements. This is equivalent to 4
points (Very Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
classroom observation. During classroom observation, I provided a variety of
assessment strategies that address most of the learning goals. A rating of 5 on
Indicator 10 – Designed, selected, organized and used diagnostic, formative and
summative assessment strategies consistent with curriculum requirements were given.
This is equivalent to 3 points (Satisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
classroom observation. During classroom observation, assessment strategies were
utilized but only some are aligned with the learning goals. A rating of 4 on Indicator 10
– Designed, selected, organized and used diagnostic, formative and summative
assessment strategies consistent with curriculum requirements were given. This is
equivalent to 2 points (Unsatisfactory) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
OBJECTIVE 11: Monitored and evaluated learner progress and achievement using
learner attainment data (PPST 5.2.2)
MOVs:
Any one (1) of the following:
1. Individual Learning Monitoring Plan (ILMP)
2. Peer Assessment Data
3. Sample of learners’ output with reflection/self-assessment
4. Progress charts/anecdotal records
5. Class Record/Grading Sheets
6. Lesson Plan showing index of mastery
7. Frequency of errors with identifies least/most mastered skills
8. Any equivalent ALS form/document that highlights the objective
ANNOTATION:
For KRA 4 - Objective 11, I have attached the Individual Learning Monitoring
Plan (ILMP) wherein pupils’ progress based on the given intervention strategies were
monitored and evaluated. I also included a sample of learners’ output with reflection,
class record and grading sheets, reading and numeracy profile as well as Item Analysis
of test results across 4 quarters. As a result, I achieved a rating of 7 on Indicator 11,
demonstrating that I reached the objective. – Monitored and evaluated learner
progress and achievement using learner attainment data. This is equivalent to 5 points
Monitored and evaluated learner progress and achievement based on

attainment from an individual data.
Timeliness - across 3 quarter
Monitored and evaluated learner progress and achievement based on class

attainment data
Monitored and evaluated learner progress and achievement based on the

existing grade level/department/learning area report.
Timeliness - in only 1 quarter
OBJECTIVE 12: Communicated promptly and clearly the learners’ needs, progress
and achievement to key stakeholders, including parents/guardians (PPST 5.4.2)
MOVs: Any one (1) of the following:
1. Sample of corrected test paper of a learner in a learning area with parent’s or

guardian’s signature and date of receipt.
2. Minutes of meetings with key stakeholders
3. Report card with parent’s or guardian’s signature in all quarters supported by

minutes of meeting
4. Communication with key stakeholders
5. Anecdotal record
6. Any equivalent ALS form/document that highlights the objective
ANNOTATION:
For KRA 4 - Objective 12, I have attached a copy a sample copy of corrected
test paper with parent’s or guardian’s signature and date of receipt as well as minutes
of meeting during PTA Conference and a communication cardex that sustained
engagement to monitor learners’needs, progress and achievement across all quarters.
In Indicator 12, I got a rating of 7, indicating that I achieved the objective –
Communicated promptly and clearly the learners’ needs, progress and achievement
to key stakeholders, including parents/guardians. This is equivalent to 5 points
Communicated promptly and clearly using various tools and strategies learners
needs, progress and achievement to key stakeholders including parents/guardians.
Communicated promptly and clearly using only one (1) strategy learners needs,
progress and achievement to key stakeholders including parents/guardians.
Communicated learners needs, progress and achievement to key stakeholders

including parents/guardians but not regularly
Timeliness - in only 1 quarter
KRA 5: PERSONAL GROWTH AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
OBJECTIVE 13: Applied a personal philosophy of teaching that is learner-centered

(PPST 7.1.2)
MOVs:
A reflection/journal entry that highlights the application of a learner-centered

teaching philosophy in the lesson plan or community work
ANNOTATION:
For KRA 5 - Objective 13, I have attached a reflection/journal entry that

highlights the application of a learner-centered teaching. It details the consistent
involvement of learners in the teaching-learning process across all 4 quarters. As a
result, in Indicator 13, I obtained a rating of 7 indicating that I met the objective –
Applied a personal philosophy of teaching that is learner-centered. This is equivalent
to 5 points (Outstanding) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
It reflects involvement of learners in the teaching-learning process resulting form

the application of a personal philosophy of teaching that is learner centered
It shows the application of a personal philosophy of teaching that is learner-

centered
It indicates a personal philosophy of teaching that is not learner-centered.
Timeliness – in only 1 quarter

OBJECTIVE 14: Set professional development goals based on the Philippine Professional
Standards for Teachers (PPST 7.5.2)
MOVs:
1. Certification from the ICT Coordinator/School Head/Focal person in-charge of e-

SAT
2. IPCRF-DP
2. Mid-Year Review Form (MRF)
3. Updated IPCRF-DP from Phase II
ANNOTATION:
For KRA 5 - Objective 14, I was able to prove that I set professional development
goals based on the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers by attaching a copy
of my updated IPCRF-Development Plan during the Phase II of the RPMS cycle and
submitted all other acceptable MOVs within the prescribed RPMS Phase. As a result, in
Indicator 14, I obtained a rating of 7 signifies that I obtained the objective – Set
professional development goals based on the Philippine Professional Standards for
Teachers. This is equivalent to 5 points (Outstanding) in the RPMS Rating Scale.
NOTES FOR OBJECTIVE 14
Very Satisfactory – Discussed progress on professional development goals with the

rater during the mid-year review as evidenced by MOV No. 3
Satisfactory – Set professional development goals based on e-SAT results as evidenced

by MOV No. 32
Unsatisfactory – Accomplished the e-SAT at the beginning of the school year as

evidenced by MOV No. 41
PLUS FACTOR
OBJECTIVE 15: Performed various related works/activities that contribute to the

teaching and learning process
MOVs: Certificates
ANNOTATION:
For Objective 15, I have attached certificates with pictures of my active

participation as I performed various related works/activities that contribute to the
teaching and learning process beyond the School/Community Learning Center (CLC)
across 4 quarters. As a result, in Indicator 15, I obtained a rating of 7 implies that I
achieved the objective – Performed various related works/activities that contribute to
the teaching and learning process. This is equivalent to 5 points (Outstanding) in the
RPMS Rating Scale.
NOTES FOR OBJECTIVE 15
Very Satisfactory – Performed at least 1 related work / activity that contributed to the
teaching-learning process within the school / Community Learning Center (CLC) as
evidenced by submitted MOV across 3 quarters
Satisfactory – Performed at least 1 related work / activity that contributed to the

teaching-learning process within the learning area / department as evidenced by
submitted MOV across 2 quarters
Unsatisfactory – Performed at least 1 related work / activity that contributed to the

teaching-learning process within the class as evidenced by submitted MOV in 1
quarter only.

ANNOTATIONS For Teachers I - III

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ANNOTATIONS For Teachers I - III

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

ANNOTATIONS For Teachers I - III

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

RESULTS-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (RPMS)

For Teachers I – III - ANNOTATIONS

KRA 1: CONTENT KNOWLEDGE AND PEDAGOGY

OBJECTIVE 1: Applied knowledge of content within and across curriculum teaching

Rating of 7 in COT – Outstanding

For KRA 1 - Objective 1, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT)

Rating of 6 in COT – Very Satisfactory

For KRA 1 - Objective 1, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT)

Rating of 5 in COT – Satisfactory

For KRA 1 - Objective 1, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT)

Rating of 4 in COT – Unsatisfactory

OBJECTIVE 2: Used a range of teaching strategies that enhance learner achievement

Rating of 7 in COT - Outstanding

For KRA 1 - Objective 2, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT)

Rating of 6 in COT – Very Satisfactory

For KRA 1 - Objective 2, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT)

Rating of 5 in COT – Satisfactory

For KRA 1 - Objective 2, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT)

Rating of 4 in COT – Unsatisfactory

OBJECTIVE 3: Applied a range of teaching strategies to develop critical and creative

For KRA 1 - Objective 3, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT)

Rating of 6 – Very Satisfactory

For KRA 1 - Objective 3, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT)

For KRA 1 - Objective 3, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT)

For KRA 1 - Objective 3, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT)

KRA 2: LEARNING ENVIRONMENT & DIVERSITY OF LEARNERS

OBJECTIVE 4: Managed classroom structure to engage learners, individually or in

For KRA 2 - Objective 4, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT)

Rating of 6 – Very Satisfactory

For KRA 2 - Objective 4, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT)

For KRA 2 - Objective 4, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT)

OBJECTIVE 5: Managed learner behavior constructively by applying positive and non-

For KRA 2 - Objective 5, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT)

OBJECTIVE 6: Used differentiated developmentally appropriate learning experiences

For KRA 2 - Objective 6, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT)

Rating of 6 – Very Satisfactory

For KRA 2 - Objective 6, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT)

For KRA 2 - Objective 6, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT)

For KRA 2 - Objective 6, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT)

KRA 3: Curriculum and Planning

OBJECTIVE 7: Planned, managed, implemented developmentally sequenced

For KRA 3 - Objective 8, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT)

Rating of 6 – Very Satisfactory

For KRA 3 - Objective 7, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT)

For KRA 3 - Objective 7, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT)

For KRA 3 - Objective 7, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT)

1. Proof/s of attendance in LAC sessions/FGDs/meetings/other collegial discussions

2. Minutes of LAC sessions/FGDs/meetings/other collegial discussions on use of

3. Reflection Notes of teachers on their demonstration of teaching practices following

4. Any equivalent form/document that highlights the objective

For KRA 3 - Objective 8, I have attached reflection notes on the demonstration

Rating of 6 – Very Satisfactory

For KRA 3 - Objective 8, I have attached reflection notes on the demonstration

For KRA 2 - Objective 8, I have attached minutes of collegial discussions

For KRA 2 - Objective 8, I attended collegial discussions that discuss

For KRA 3 - Objective 9, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT)

Rating of 6 – Very Satisfactory

For KRA 3 - Objective 9, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT)

For KRA 3 - Objective 9, I have attached my Classroom Observation Tool (COT)