With grateful thanks
> WINE is working to keep those old Windows binaries running well on modern 64-bit Unix-like OSes
And we're grateful for this.
Lots of old and dear games...
4486 publicly visible posts • joined 9 Oct 2017
> If I do, should I enable it just for one week (and regain the bit of protection against scammers) or do I enable indefinitely?
Come on, the only two cases where this applies are either you're senile and don't trust in the continuity of your judgment, or you install something on some elderly relative's phone.
In other words, people who will use this feature usually should be savvy enough to not fall for "very urgent" support scams. Meaning they can leave it on forever.
> if your operational security plan relies on the hope that nobody will ever ask you for a six-digit code in a chat
Aw come on! The only way for things to stay secret no matter how naive the user might be is to shoot them: Dead users don't talk. As long as there is at least one user alive, no amount of paranoid security will save you from human stupidity. And no gadget or flashy new fad either.
What will save you, what needs to be done is to educate people, and surprisingly it's quite efficient if my elder relatives are anything to go by (Email account confirmation? Bank account allegedly hacked? Nephew allegedly imprisoned? They have faced and mastered them all).
> a remarkably advanced technique known in the trade as asking for the password.
Indeed. And which apparently works remarkably well, a huge part of the flourishing phishing industry is built upon it: "There is some very serious problem with your account, please send us your login and password so we can verify it's you".
> We're gonna need more, larger impactors
Or smaller asteroids...
.
Serious now, this is promising, but based on the assumption we'll spot the offending asteroid a long time in advance. For bigger asteroids this is credible, but then the impactor would need to be proportionally bigger, with all the technical problems launching it. For smaller asteroids on the other hand, the chances to spot them in time get proportionally smaller too. So, yes, it works, but is far from a silver bullet impactor.
> You seem to believe that at this moment (not 50 years ago), the U.S. government is better at this than commercial companies are.
Obviously "at this moment" there is no U.S. government, there is only the court of the orange king.
But generally speaking, non-profit or long-term research can only done by government funding, because companies never look beyond the next fiscal quarter. They are only interested to fund research they can turn into a profit rather quickly.
> Commercial cargo worked.
Of course, transporting cargo is a simple service you can easily outsource and pay/get paid for. The ISS on the other hand is a scientific endeavor without any commercial aspect. If you want to make money out of a space station you'll have to turn it into a hotel for wealthy space tourists, which means any "commercial" space station won't really be able to replace the ISS as a research lab in space.
Not better, not worse, simply a completely different thing.
The plan is that Windows = Copilot, so you do everything through Copilot. You don't need anything else, do you...
Unfortunately this isn't one of my usual sarcasms, I'm sure I read it in an El Reg article (quite) some time ago, Microsoft seriously thinks about doing it for the/a next Windows version.
Unfortunately this is called "preaching to the converted", the happy few reading El Reg. The vast majority of users remain caught in the net of Microsoft and won't leave Windows anytime soon (because of convenience, ignorance or both): Microsoft can do to them whatever they want, people will grumble a little and keep using it. And seeing this, Microsoft keeps getting bolder and bolder...
Don't be a pessimist: "Updates" doesn't necessarily mean new features. Most updates will be just changing the placement or shape of some buttons, or tweak some color. The point is to look fresh, new and frantic, not to having progressed towards a browser-brain interface by the end of the year. Apparently frequent releases look good, they sound industrious.
> the intention to reduce corporate debt
Of course, but where is the benefit if by reducing debt you also reduce future profits?
In both cases future profits will be lower. Maybe the sold assets did earn you less than you would spend to pay off the debt over a period, but I don't see how that difference could be big enough to make the share value increase by 81 percent! Nah, definitely unable to understand the logic...
That's like saying "developing faster-than-light propulsion sounds far more interesting than trying to return to the Moon".
Baby steps. Right now we can't even simply go to the Moon, so how are we supposed to install heavy high(est)-precision instruments on it? Not to mention the small problem of communicating with anything on the far side of the moon. Sorry, reality is a bitch...
> Even many science-minded people think JWST is a Hubble replacement
The Duning-Kruger is strong on them. Unfortunately, for most people who know little about astronomy we (mankind) just need a telescope, i.e. one. "Telescope? Check. Who cares what it is called, it's a telescope after all, isn't it". Their dentists should set about using a pneumatic drill, that would teach them about the complexity of the world they live in...
> The tenacity with which that thing clung to its MS operating system was astonishing.
Sorry but that's not my experience: When I bought my latest laptop it had Win11 preinstalled (obviously), which I decided to keep for firmware updates. So I shrunk it down to the minimum, and used the freed space to install Linux. Worked like a charm, the laptop reliably boots to Linux, and I never had any unexpected Windows burps. For the record same thing happened with my previous laptop: Initially on Windows, shrunk, added Linux, no problems.
As already stated, hotkeys on boot require repeated hitting. AFAIK that's a BIOS quirk, since it all happens before the OS gets anything to say.
> and now all the newer versions will be objectively worse.
But they have more AI!!!! So the idiots will rush to buy them nevertheless...
To be fair, manufacturers do everything they can to make their older phones obsolete and dangerous to use, simply by not providing security patches anymore for somewhat older models. And of course by making batteries so hard to replace you have to really, really want to keep your old, now unsafe phone...
Pollution? That's a hippy communist notion! Money doesn't smell, even the ancient Romans knew that! The real problem is we can't bill those despicable Europeans for all that good American lithium they steal!
Disclaimer: Above statement(s) is/are an example of "sarcasm", shouldn't be taken literally and don't reflect my personal opinion.
> denying the possibility of problems and blaming the user
I'm doing neither. The fact is, what you describe is not a common issue, and since it happens on all your computers, there has to be a common factor. Assuming those 6 computers don't all use the same sound hardware (pointing to a driver issue), that leaves us with the OS installations. Maybe done from faulty installation media? I don't know, I'm not a computer expert. I don't say "it's your fault", but you have to admit that the only thing (we know of) that those 6 computers have in common is your Mint installation. And there has to be a common factor.
Unless of course you prefer to think that Linux Mint hates you personally, they have somehow detected which computers you have installed, and have sabotaged them just to spite you... :-p
I don't know what your gripe with sound is. I admit I'm not a musician (someone once tried to explain to me about latency issues or some such), but for the average user I am, sound has been working reliably in Mint for over 10 years now (Mint 17-21), including listening to music and watching movies when traveling with my laptop. I never had any freezes either, so there is definitely something fishy with your installation(s) or configuration(s).
(Didn't downvote you though.)
> build your ATM on a Windows platform
I'm not trying to defend the use of Windows, but from what I just read bad guys open the ATM and access the hard drive. Even if you ran Linux or whatever else, from the moment the bad guys get access to the innards of the ATM it's most likely game over: Even if the hard drive is securely encrypted, they just need to switch it for one which runs their own brand of software. After all they only need access to one single instruction: "spill the beans, all of them, now".
> If you are rich enough that you can throw away that kind of money on something as frivolous as this, you aren't doing your own laundry anyway.
Came to say the same thing: $8k just to avoid 5 to 10 minutes of work/week? In that case you certainly can also afford to hire some domestic help who will take care of the whole laundry process, hamper to wardrobe, and will handle your expensive clothes with proper care.
I understand they're still (many) years away from the perfect robotic butler who will clean, do the laundry, cook dinner, walk the dog, bring you your newspaper, answer the phone and get the groceries needed to prepare aforementioned dinner, but the limited version they try to start with is kind of really limited... The only potential clients I see are those who need to impress their visitors ("Hey, look how cool I am, I have a laundry-folding robot!").
> “In other words, more science, less wasteful spending, and less politics involved in the process.”
Translates into the well-known "don't work harder, work smarter!"
Besides I'm sure scientists needed the reminder to do some science (between packing hamburgers).
.
> An interesting assertion given the DoE's recent disavowal of decades of climate science.
Nowadays there is Good science, and there is Bad science. It's simple: Climate = Bad science. Vaccines = Bad science. Who needs vaccines, drinking bleach cures all diseases!
Disclaimer: Above statement(s) is/are an example of "sarcasm", shouldn't be taken literally and don't reflect my personal opinion.
> Who are we kidding?
Nobody. This was an oversight and will be fixed momentarily. Microsoft is all about removing useful functionality, and adding shiny, happy gadgets nobody asked for or wants (except Microsoft's marketing department).
Windows has been steadily dumbed down since Win7. Windows 14 will only have a big button "Give us money" in fancy colors (and require about 2 TB of disk space).
Stick an RFID chip on every fish, have fishers scan them (could even be automated), ready! Why doesn't anybody think of the easy solutions!...
Disclaimer: Above statement(s) is/are an example of "sarcasm", shouldn't be taken literally and don't reflect my personal opinion.
> It works because every company sends lots of genuine emails with links in them.
Well, most of those links are about stuff nobody cares about (except that company's marketing department)... The only links I click on are links I was already expecting (like validation or download links and such).
After all the rule is very simple and requires absolutely no knowledge whatsoever (even your old aunt can manage, mine does): Never ever click on a link sent in an email! Period.
If you suspect the message might be genuine, go by your own means (i.e. bookmark) to your account and check for any relevant information.