
Re: ...or you could opt out of receiving substitutions altogether.
> Doesn't mean your choice will be considered
Yes, you get a substitute choice...
4216 publicly visible posts • joined 9 Oct 2017
> we don't need to keep looking for chemicals in exoplanet atmospheres or distant radio signals
Obligatory xkcd: https://xkcd.com/638/
> Why?
Because baby steps. Because until very recently we weren't even able to go (back) to our moon (anymore).
Obviously one can chose to totally disregard one's own limitations and fantasize about going to Mars and beyond, but more reasonable/prudent people would like to make sure we can at least send people as far as our own satellite before trying Mars.
> any near-by metal could blur the results
Isn't it the case that any nearby metal could blur the patient, due to the extremely high magnetic fields the MRI generates?
AFAIK the most important risks include inductive heating (burns), and metallic objects flying across the room to crush/decapitate/otherwise maim you...
> It doesn't say which constellations are causing the problem.
It's the others! It's the others! Probably the Chinese! :-p
Seriously, who cares which specific constellation is causing which streak, that's just finger pointing and trying to wiggle out of responsibility. The fact is, satellites do impede astronomical observation, and in this case, the usual dumb "so why don't you use orbital telescopes?" argument doesn't stand, since Hubble is an orbital telescope...
Indeed, the Moon is tidally locked to Earth and thus a lunar day/night period is around 29.5 Earth days long. Which is a little too long to stay awake, so much like in our polar regions, inhabitants will simply ignore the sun and just live their normal human 24/25h day cycle. Even more easily since they will be living underground, under artificial lights.
If it is a rather low traffic place, only allow manual registering, meaning the forum admin creates accounts on demand.
We found out while making a truly impossible CAPTCHA, something no man or machine could ever guess (only a single person ever managed to get past it in 10+ years!). Bots and spammers would simply keep trying to guess the CAPTCHA, but legit potential users would eventually send us an angry complaint email, to which we routinely answered with an apology, an explanation, and the credentials for their new account... Worked like a charm, and didn't prevent lots of people from registering. As an added benefit, besides never any spam at all (maybe one a year), you only got the users who really wanted to get in, and as a result were passionate and interesting to talk with.
Indeed. I was there when Chrome was released, nobody knew it existed, but in half a year it was on all computers, silently installed by some other program's installer. Usually some of the constant and unavoidable Adobe Updates...
If I had been given $1 each time I uninstalled a clandestine Chrome I would have made enough to buy me a nice car.
> to keep things simple
Edge to keep things simple? Why, the simplest solution is Firefox with uBlock Origin. I have set it up for most of my family and friends and nobody has ever complained, except some teenagers with very strong opinions about what a proper browser should look like (peer pressure and all). For other people, especially the ones who's most technically advanced use is visiting YouTube, Firefox "just works".
Yes, that, and whoever controls the browsers controls the juicy Internet trade. Microsoft already knew this when they decided to kill Netscape (back then).
That's why people fight bloody wars over them: The last browser standing will control a market worth billions of dollars.
> they were using dirty tricks
That's obviously not an excuse, but they all do it: "Yes" means "yes", but "Cancel" and "No" always mean "ask me again later".
"Not taking no for an answer" is a common marketing guideline. After all you don't care about the customers' opinions, you just want their money, ASAP.
> Linux? Too complicated
Not necessarily, depending on the level of cluelessness of the user of course. In my own experience, the user difficulty level of Linux Mint is around WinXP level, meaning that those who managed to work with WinXP can use Linux Mint just fine, unless/until they wonder why MS Office or the latest game doesn't install of course. That's the deal breaker moment -- that, and people having very strong opinions what a proper computer OS should look alike...
For instance I've had an elder relative running Linux Mint without even knowing it (she just needed web and email), until the day a granddaughter of hers arrived and decided she couldn't find something Windowsy, so she reformatted her grandma's computer, found and installed a cracked version of Windows instead, and from there everything went to hell (and beyond). By then I had officially resigned my position as private 24/7 hotline*, the conclusion of the story I heard is that this elder relative had to buy a new computer. With proper Windows...
* That might sound harsh in this circumstance, but I just can't guarantee service continuity when people make random changes of that importance behind my back without even asking me.
> However, given the timescales involved in a, hoped-for existence of human life on Earth, and b, mean time between continent-destroying meteorites hitting our planet
We have no clue about the mean time between collisions, just assumptions. Realistically the next species-annihilating event could happen in 5 days or in 5 billion years, or any time in between. So, given the choice to act according to one of those quite different scenarios, obviously we'll chose the one which allows us to do nothing... Or at least nothing more involved than talking about it...
.
> this 'moment in time' could reasonably be taken as meaning the next hundred or thousand years.
Exactly: Let's assume this won't hit anytime soon and let's worry about something else, shall we... If we're wrong, well, though luck. The dinosaurs were wrong too, do they complain?
> it will involve deploying some sort of hardware into space
Well, in the article I see quotes like "should be detected by NEOMIR (after 2030...) at least three weeks in advance", and "In the worst-case scenario [...] we would get a minimum of three days' warning".
In three weeks, or even worse, in three days, we won't even have the time to decide who's in charge, so he can assemble a steering committee who will decide upon a series of specialist meetings to evaluate the options and formulate a projected budget to submit to potential financing...
Our asteroid defense plan relies mainly on the hope it won't strike us, and the impact is small/limited enough so we (ourselves) might survive it unscathed. It's a cheap plan, that's for sure, but marginally efficient...
I don't know why jake got downvoted, the question the researchers at the Department of Energy's Argonne National Labs were asked was, "what will happen in specific regions of the USA". To quote, "The work is intended to help lawmakers make informed decisions when making policy around near-term droughts and floods".
So, the answer to the question where the rain will go is just "not here".
> it will be trivial for the ad networks to de-anonymize the ID
Indeed, when they say "a pseudo-anonymous digital token that cannot be reverse-engineered" you already know this will be totally transparent, and given the number of actors very quickly public. Their reaction? "Oh sorry, that was a bug, it was supposed to be 'impossible' to reverse-engineer, not 'trivial'. Oh well, of course now it's too late to change it, sorry again. Hey, after all if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear. Ah yes, and think of the children too!"
You are supposed to be able to say "no", but we have to protect you from that error because it's in your own interest to opt in, it would be a crying shame to miss out on all those amazing opportunities...
And this will certainly remain so as long as the induced expenses (fines) remain smaller than the profits.
> something rendered by someone the first time they tried Blender
You might be on to something. The picture does look like a bad render actually: All edges are razor sharp, the material is strange-looking, and the lighting is unnatural (no shadows, the whole thing is glowing). Last but not least, if you look at those strange black circles and the square (???), they look blurry, like a low-definition texture.
I'd vote somebody doodled it in SketchUp...
> Some DVD players allow "region switching", but then only a fixed number of times before it sticks to one region.
That isn't a problem IMHO: Unless you're a globetrotter and buy DVDs on all your trips all over the world, you'd usually just have one other country you might regularly buy DVDs from, and in this case it's as convenient to dedicate a DVD player just to that region (assuming it's different). DVD players are dirt cheap nowadays...
> The thing might be sniffing RF
Over a big part of the USA? Where is the Hindenburg-sized trailer balloon with the Petabyte storage? Without that they'd just learn there is a lot of RF traffic going on, which I guess they already knew...
IMHO this is just to annoy the US administration. It is possible that, much like the Sputnik 1 satellite, the only thing it carries is a $0.2 emitter going "ping!"... Despite its lack of any useful features, Sputnik had quite some success back then, remember?
You'd expect that only periods worth showing off are posted there.
This "research" is totally worthless since its data is skewed from the very start.
Any extraterrestrial studying human behavior through YT videos would wonder how comes we haven't gone extinct yet, between the appalling stupidity and the tendency to carelessly do dangerous stuff.
Not necessarily. I had a cat which adored me, and I pointedly never ever fed her myself. Specifically to be able to make that point.
I think cats are just like humans, they simply like or don't like somebody. Of course they are also unapologetically self-interested, like humans, but the nice thing is that unlike humans they don't make any fuss about it.
Dogs on the other hand have complicated social requirements everything needs to conform to, much more complicated (even if it usually suits humans needing an dependable and obsequious work animal).
> The person in question is no longer internal to Meta.
But his soul belongs to Meta for all eternity... He did sell it, according to the (very) fine print in page 68, and all sales are final.
In case you wondered why your work contracts have to be signed in blood.
> "switch off" would be more clear
"But I'm not switching it off, don't worry, I'm just trying to get it back to working order 'cause I need to get work done."
"If pulling the plug doesn't work, I'll try kicking it repeatedly (works for my lawn mover), or pouring some cold water into it. "
On one hand you hear people making big plans about deflecting or destroying asteroids which might crash into us, on the other hand you see that the average time between discovery and collision/flyby is usually measured in weeks if not days...
Somehow those two don't fit together. If some astronomer manages to detect (despite the cloud of Internet satellites) a killer asteroid coming for us, we won't even have the time to plan a meeting to chose the committee which will oversee the project...
> they seem to neglect to say why
You only start really to live when you can check on your toothbrush from the underground/train/plane...
Why? Because they can, obviously. Build it and somebody will come (and think it is useful to them and they shouldn't live without that feature).
Nagging, beeping microwaves are my pet peeve (also applies to other kit, including cars' seat belt alerts*). My own microwave is a cheap mechanical one making a single "Bing" too, and I plan to keep it as long as possible. I am not (yet) senile enough to need constant reminding that I've put something in the microwave 2 minutes ago and it might be ready by now.
* My car beeps 4-5 times if somebody doesn't put on his seat belt, then it shuts up for a minute, then tries again. And so on. That is IMHO the right setting for a "helpful reminder", any more and it becomes "obnoxious nagging".
> the nuclear bit just being "payload" until it's out the atmosphere
Payload or not, even if it's not yet operating (fuel rods isolated), nobody likes being showered with several kilos of uranium/plutonium dust: If the rocket launch fails for any reason, the reactor and its highly unwelcome contents will be scattered all over the area.