[BigHopeClasic] ãà ܸApêÍfèIÈ�N¾ï¿½ï¿½ðð¯éXüª éÌÅA�}¤ï¿½ï¿½¤\»ÍÀÍfèIȪ½ï¿½ï¿½B^Á¦ÄAÈwͽØÂ\Èà̾©çA100ÌfèÍ�}ÌèÌ�}ÆÅ͵È��B 2011/01/16ÉεÄATAKESAN³ñªú{êÅðøpµÄuzIpV[ÉεÄ��\»ÅøÊðÛèµÄ��év�}Æð¦µÄ��ܷB
==>TAKESAN:"zIpV[ÍvZ{¾Æ¾ÁÄ��éH" (2011/01/17) on Interdisciplinary
KumicitÍú{êÅÍÁÄÈ��¯ÇAożãÉ�LÍÁÄ��éÌÅAÎÓð©Ä�N«Ü·BÈ�NA²ÓÍKumicitÌÚ\»B
ÈãAzIpV[ÌðjðTϵA�}Ì¡Ã@ÌLø«ð»è·é½ßÉsíêÄ«½½ÌæègÝðÐî·é½ßÉÌð��ī½ªA_ÍÈP¾B�}êÜÅɽSÆ��¤Õ���}ªsíêÄ«½ªAÇÌaCÉεÄàAzIpV[ðx·éæ¤ÈALÓÌAÈ��µà¾ÍÌ éÈwIªÍÐÆÂà¾çêÄ��È��BtÉAzIpV[EfBÉÍÜÁ½øʪÈ���}Æð¦·ÈwIªÈç½ éÆq�~Ä�N̪ö³¾ë¤Biãª@P182E183juø©È��ØÍRÌæ¤É é(mountain of)vÆIWiÌûª¿åÁÆßB
It has taken several thousand words to review the history of homeopathy and to survey the various attempts to test its efficacy, but the conclusion is simple: hundreds of trials have failed to deliver significant or convincing evidence to support the use of homeopathy for the treatment of any particular ailment. On the contrary, it would be fair to say that there is a mountain of evidence to suggest that homeopathic remedies simply don't work. ... (P.139)
àú{êóÅãßÉÈÁÄ��éÆ�}ëÅ...
zIpXÍA©ª½¿ÌfBÉͽµ©Éø«Úª éƾ¤¾ë¤ªAàÁÆàMÅ«éµï¿½ï¿½ÈÈwIªÉæêÎAzIpV[ÌfBÉÍgªÈA³ÒÉyÚ·øÊÍSÊIÉvZ{øÊÉæé�}ƪí©ÁÄ��éBiP314jugªÈvÍã��\»¾ªAIWiÍuBOGUSv·Èí¿ÒWå²B
Homeopaths will argue that their remedies are genuinely effective, but we know that the best scientific evidence concludes that homeopathic remedies are bogus and rely wholly on the placebo effect in order to benefit patients. (p.244)
Ô²Ç̳ÒÉεÄàALø«Ìؾ³ê½A��ÈçÈ��RqX^~ÜÉÁ¦ÄA�NܯƵÄÂ��ÄévZ{øÊðp��éÙ¤ªAvZ{øʾ¯µ©È��zIpV[EfBðg¤æè¸ÁÆ����¾ë¤Bi\ª\jÊíãÃÌ�~òÉÍAÀسê½øÊÉÁ¦ÄvZ{øÊà é̾©çAvZ{øʾ¯µ©È��zIpV[ÌùÝòæèÍܵÈ̾BiP320j
Similarly, for patients suffering from hay fever, a non-drowsy antihistamine that has benn proved to work, plus its inevitable placebo effect, would be a much better option than a homeopathic placebo on its own. ... The proven benefits of conventional cold tablets plus their placebo effect are, again, better than just the placebo effect of homeopathic tablets.(p.248)
�}ÌãÍAú{êóÆIWiÅãÍ�L��È��B
Xl[NICà�LxóßÌzIpV[EfBàALø��ªÍÜÜêÄ�Nç¸AvZ{øʾ¯µ©È��BiP321j
Both snake oil and ultra-diluted homeopathic remedies contain no active ingredient, and both also offer nothing but a placebo effect. (p.249)
zIpV[ÍvZ{øʵ©úÒÅ«È��ÈUòÌT^ÅAzIpV[ÌøÊͷ�~ÄvZ{øÊÅ èAÈwIªÉàÆÃ��Ļf·éÈçA�}Ì¡Ã@ðp��é�}Æͳ»Å«È��BiP349j
Homeoathy is a good example of a pure placebo, as its only impact is via placebo effect, and there is no justification at all for using it based on any scientific evidence. (p.269)
ÓF�}Ì»iÉÍvZ{øʵ© èܹñBzIpV[ðM��Ä��ÄAÇóªÉÝâ}TÈÇÅ élÉÌÝøʪ èÜ·B»ÌêÅàAÊíãÃÌòÌæ¤È��øÊ;çêÈ��ŵå¤BÊíãÃÌòæèàìpÍN�}èÉ��ŷªAøÊàÈ��ŵå¤B
Warning: this product is a placebo. It will work only if you believe in homeopathy, and only for certain conditions such as pain and depression. Even then, it is not likely to be as powerful as orthodox drugs. You may get fewer side-effects from this treatment than from a drug, but you will probably also get less benefit. (p.284)
êûAuèIvÉÂ��ÄÍ...
ÓF�}Ì¡Ã@ÉÂ��ÄÍA��©Ì^CvÌÉÝâf«CÉÍøʪ éÆ��¤Aí¸©ÈÈwIªª¾çêÄ��éÌÝÅ·B»êçÌÇóÉø��½êàAø«Úͷ�}©¸AñíÉ��³ÈàÌÆÈéŵå¤BÊíãÃÌ¡ÃÉç�~Äïpª©©èAøÊÍ��³ï¿½ï¿½ÆÝÄܸÔá�� èܹñB�}Ì¡Ã@ÌåÈøÊÍ�N»çAÉÝâf«CÉηévZ{øÊŵå¤B»êÈO̷�~ÄÌaCÉεÄAèIÉÍvZ{ðãñéøÊÍ èܹñBèIÍAPûðó¯½{pÒÉÅÁÄàç¦ÎA©ÈèÀSÈ¡Ã@Æ��¦Ü·BiP370jzIpV[ÆáÁÄAf¾ðð¯é\»ðgÁÄÜ·ËB
This treatment has shown only very limited evidence that it can treat some types of pain and nausea. If it is effective for these conditions, then its benefits appear to be short-lived and minor. It is more expensive than conventional treatments, and very likely to be less effective. It is likely that its major impact is as a placebo in treating pain and nausea. In the treatment of all other conditions, acupuncture either has no effect other than a placebo effect. It is a largely safe treatment when practised by a trained acupuncturist. (p.285)
^OFQuackery