Wikipedia:XfD today

Shortcuts

This page transcludes all of the deletion debates opened today on the English-language Wikipedia, including articles, categories, templates, and others, as a convenience to XfD-watchers. Please note that because this material is transcluded, watchlisting this page will not provide you with watchlist updates about deletions; WP:DELT works best as a browser bookmark checked regularly.

Speedy deletion candidates

Candidates for speedy deletion

User:A.piquerasm/Barrotes

User:Adediwuraola12/sandbox

Draft:Artistry of Prisoners

User:Bappa1983/sandbox

Draft:Bofu Marketing Agency

Draft:Buća Potok

Cartoon Network (Philippine)

Cartoon Network (WixSite)

Template:Cite Odyssey

User talk:Crochetmind

Draft:De Verdad Que

Draft:Dragisa M. Kovacevic

User:Emma-vestergaard-møller

Draft:February 2025 North American storm complex

Gajapati Empire

User:GreenLipstickLesbian/Lepidiolamprologus elongatus

User:Haoreima/Meitei martial arts

User talk:Hello0028my/sandbox

HUBCO Green

Template:International Olympic Committee profile

Template:IOC athlete

Template:IOC name

Draft:Jafar Thottupurath

User:Jagjot Bhullar

Talk:Jennifer Cook

User:Jon Ortenero

Draft:Jose Valenzuela

User:Josephperello/sandbox

User:Josh Naidoo/sandbox

Juan Glassford

Draft:Lolo and the Kid

Draft:Los Angeles Cricket

User:Lovi33etoo

Template:OC

Template:Olympic channel

Template:Olympic Channel profile

Template:Olympic profile

Template:Olympic.org

Template:Olympics profile

Template:Olympics.com profile/sandbox

Template:Olympics.org

User talk:Padmapriyakvr

Polvere

Rajeswari S raina

Dr. Anand Ranganathan

User:Raph Williams65/User Likes Pickle

Rumelt

Draft:Siege of Ahmednagar (1595)

Siege of Bamyan (1221)

Andy Soloman

Draft:Yery with tilde

User:Zahidkhanpp/sandbox

User:Zatars

Articles

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< February 15	February 17 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Rajagopalachari (given name)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources, fails WP:GNG ProtobowlAddict ^uwu! (talk | contributions) 19:07, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ebru Eroğlu

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP1E, WP:NOTNEWS. She is known for being one of a few people who were expelled from the Turkish army after a recent controversy. Badbluebus (talk) 04:55, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Women, Events, and Turkey. Badbluebus (talk) 04:55, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:56, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I agree, textbook example of BLP1E, I was planning to add notability tag to the page and then I saw it was nominated for deletion. I don't think it will pass WP:10YEARTEST at all, most likely won't even pass a "one year test".Tehonk (talk) 09:15, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BLP1E, this individual appears to be hardly documented other than in the event of her being being expelled from the Turkish army, an event which is not significant in its own right. jolielover♥talk 10:23, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: It is true that Ebru Eroğlu was expelled from the military due to a recent controversy. However, the focus is on her because she is the most significant figure among those involved in the action mentioned in the article. This type of incident has occurred for the first time in the history of the Republic of Turkey, impacting both the military and the public. While it has been covered almost daily by the entire Turkish media, it has also gained attention in European and American press. Additionally, she is the first female soldier to graduate as the top student from the Turkish Military Academy. Therefore, I believe it is appropriate for the article to remain. Biologg (talk) 10:30, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

~~Redirect~~ Merge to Turkish Military Academy#2024 Oath controversy, where the incident is covered and she is mentioned by name; it does seem to be her only claim for notability, so BLP1E seems relevant. Changed vote to "Merge", on seeing that the text of the oath isn't yet in the target article. PamD 11:46, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:08, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Boy Scouts

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Highly confusing. It's not a disambiguation page (there's already Boy Scout (disambiguation), with a 10-year old discussion about merging the two, Talk:Boy_Scouts#Merge_of_Boy_Scouts_(disambiguation)). It seems a set-index article, as it's just a list. Boy scouts redirects here but Boy scout doesn't. fgnievinski (talk) 01:48, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scouting-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:59, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep at least for now. This information could be moved elsewhere, but I am unclear where, but until that is done it should be kept. Bduke (talk) 02:35, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Lists. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:33, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge I don't see the need for both of these dab/set pages. Reywas92^Talk 06:19, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think the point is that "Boy Scouts" is a term that is used across the world. It is not restricted to the USA. Bduke (talk)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:21, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Boy Scouts and Boy Scout are two related but distinct concepts. Boy Scouts refers to the umbrella of organizations within Scouting whereas Boy Scout refers to the individual member, usually called a Scout. To prevent confusing crossovers, anything referring to or containing "Boy Scout" (singular) should remain on Boy Scout (disambiguation) whereas anything referring to "Boy Scouts" (e.g. organizations related to the movement) should be on Boy Scouts. The pages should have a hatnote referencing the other DAB page. I think merging the two would make things more confusing. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 19:38, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. I'd prefer a merge with Boy Scout (disambiguation) since the terms are not always carefully distinguished and Wikipedia rarely has seperate pages for the singular and plural of a term. But the preference is not strong and certainly deletion is unhelpful. The content should be preserved and the title a Blue link whatever merges or refactorings occur. Eluchil404 (talk) 04:35, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: We need to be sure of exactly where we want this merged to, if that is the going to be the outcome of this discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:08, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OnLogic

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable. Written like an advertisement. Almost all of the sources are just press releases or other marketing content. drt1245 (talk) 18:38, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mubeen Gabol

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are a lot of passing mentions, but it lacks direct and in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG. Gheus (talk) 18:26, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Pakistan. Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 19:31, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Donny Crown

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this article fails WP:MUSICBIO. He is still an up-and-coming artist who has only released three songs. None of his songs have charted on any country's official music chart. Most of the sources cited in the article are press releases about his songs. A couple of the other sources are from media outlets, who interviewed him. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 18:22, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bands and musicians, and Nigeria. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 18:22, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jahanzeb Khan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are articles like this which come with bylines like "web desk" but these are not enough to pass WP:GNG. Gheus (talk) 18:20, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Asma Chaudhry

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. This article is non-independent because it was covered by DAWN when she joined Dawn TV. Gheus (talk) 17:55, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Journalism, Television, and Pakistan. Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 19:27, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ayesha Bakhsh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Brief mentions are not enough to pass WP:SIGCOV requirements. Fails WP:GNG. Gheus (talk) 17:52, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Journalism, Television, and Pakistan. Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 19:28, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jasmeen Manzoor

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Coverage is mostly based on routine mentions or from affiliated organizations (like joining BOL News results in brief coverage in BOL News itself ([1])) Lacks direct and in-depth coverage. Fails WP:GNG. Gheus (talk) 17:50, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Journalism, Television, and Pakistan. Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 19:29, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OverIT

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company, fails WP:NCORP. Gheus (talk) 17:39, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Management, and Italy. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:45, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Table of metaheuristics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NLIST.

Some of the items (e.g. Genetic Algorithm) indeed have notability.

Otherwise, notability the list is not shown. Are there any mentions of metaheuristic algorithms as a group other than a reason to introduce another one, or to take action on unchecked creation of such algorithms?

As metaheuristic algorithms still continue to be introduced at a pace of (conservatively) dozens per year, this list is arbitrary in nature, which is another argument for not having it.

For more context, there is an attempt to have such a listing elsewhere, also lagging behind the current state.

Another possible course of action is to clean the list up (to those algorithms with a Wiki page) and merge into the main article.

Neodiprion demoides (talk) 17:38, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:46, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm leaning more towards BLAR than straight deletion, but this isn't a useful DAB page. All entries are PTMs except for Procedural (genre) (which is just a redirect to Procedural drama). It would make more sense for this title to redirect there rather than the current situation. — Anonymous 17:23, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. — Anonymous 17:23, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sean Spiller

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Union leader, gubernatorial candidate, and former mayor of a town with a population of ~40k. Not really a bio that necessitates a Wikipedia page, and I can't find anything on Google that rises beyond the level of routine coverage. If he loses the gubernatorial race, is anyone really going to be searching him on Wikipedia in 10 years? BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 16:33, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and New Jersey. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:47, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as the author of the more-than-a-stub-article with multiple reliable references and seeking completion of profiles in Wikipedia of all declared candidates in the 2025 NJ gubernatorial election. In the most recent Emerson College poll, he's polling in second behind Mikie Sherrill and tied with Ras Baraka, and ahead of Josh Gottheimer and Stephen Sweeney (and far ahead of Steve Fulop, another mayor in the gov's race). In addition to all of that, he is indeed a union leader of what is, in New Jersey, one of the most influential unions in the state. Some may find it interesting that there actually seems to be an effort to not have a coherent set of data for Spiller; part of the reason I created the article was I couldn't find a clearly defined biography for him. Thus, in the best manner of Wikipedia, I set forth to assemble one for others who may be wondering about the only candidate for which there was not only no Wikipedia article...but not a lot of clear through-line on his life, work and what put him in the #2 spot (the answer actually seems to be..."the NJEA"). Feel free to peruse my history, but as a solid Deletionist, saying the word Keep in an AfD feels weird. RasputinAXP (talk) 18:18, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lukáš Kožička

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Kožička played a total of 125 minutes at professional level before disappearing in 2015. Regarding secondary sources, my searches showed nothing better than passing mentions in squad list. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 15:53, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Slovakia. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 15:53, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Hasn't played enough to have enough written about him. Fails WP:GNG – RossEvans19 (talk) 18:44, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of boats in The Adventures of Tintin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

So, there's some interesting stuff here in the form of well written and referenced text on "The maritime world in The Adventures of Tintin", but this is wrapped in fancrufty and poorly referenced list that fails WP:NLIST (and while the list appears to have plenty of footnotes, many are just unreferenced notes or commentary). As a list, I think his has no reason to exist, but the content could probably be merged somewhere, or maybe split (or perhaps we could just delete the list part of this article and rename it?). It's a weird case, I've very rarely seen some good content bundled with bad one in such a way... If this is somehow kept, obviously, this is not a list of boats, but ships (or ships and boats?). _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:40, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Comics and animation, Lists, and France. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:40, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: For what it's worth, the corresponding article in French is a GA. The topic is covered in a dedicated book! Horeau, Y. (1999). Tintin, Haddock et les bateaux. (Among other existing sources) Meets WP:NL. Topic addressed as a set.The rest of the issues are normal issues that can be handled through normal editing. Most of the ships in Tintin are notable, btw. Even see GNews -Mushy Yank. 19:12, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. -Mushy Yank. 22:46, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and WP:NLIST. Azuredivay (talk) 09:38, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Mushy Yank. BilletsMauves^€500 10:50, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and WP:NLIST. I'm only seeing trivial mentions and plot details. The relevant plot stuff is already mentioned at the main series article, which would be an acceptable redirect target, per WP:ATD. Shooterwalker (talk) 20:54, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and rename to List of ships in The Adventures of Tintin as more appropriate title (I assume this might come from French "bateaux" as in the title of Horeu's book meaning both ships and boats). As already pointed out by Mushy Yank there are secondary sources with enough coverage as to fullfill WP:LISTN. Everything else are problems which can be solved through normal editing and are therefore no grounds for deletion. If someone wants to transform this into a fully prose article, or even expand the scope to The sea in The Adventures of Tintin, I have no objections. But these again would be editorial decisions which are no grounds for deleting what we have now. Daranios (talk) 16:35, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting in the hopes of finding a more definitive consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BD2412 T 02:06, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The book citation provided by Mushy Yank, as well as other secondary sources that are already in the article, indicate that the ships have been discussed as a group, therefore alleviating the main concern of the nominator and the other delete voters. Simply citing the policy without explaining why it violates NLIST like some have done here is a very poor deletion rationale. Obviously, the article needs to be renamed to List of ships in The Adventures of Tintin, but all of the issues in the article can be resolved through editing and are not indicative of a fundamental flaw that warrants full deletion. Billclinton1996 (talk) 07:31, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge some of the content on Secret of the Unicorn and Red Sea Sharks to their respective articles. I was somewhat hesitant, but a deeper look at the sources reveals that there is quite literally only one piece of SIGCOV, that being the book Yank mentioned above. Much of the dev info is about individual ships COATRACKED together, and not as the discussion of boats as a whole. Some of this info is worthwhile for preservation at individual subjects, but one SIGCOV piece and a lot of COATRACKING just isn't enough to base an entire article on. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 03:12, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, All Tomorrows No Yesterdays (Ughhh.... What did I do wrong this time?) 15:50, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dylan Inserra

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:GNG and does not meet guidelines of WP:NGYMNAST, which appears to be the purported claim to fame. Citations are brief mentions at best with a search uncovering no significant coverage of subject. GauchoDude (talk) 16:54, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Additional comment, de-PRODed by Ingratis without addressing any of the issues raised. Adding for awareness. GauchoDude (talk) 16:58, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Rugby union, and Texas. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:10, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Ingratis (talk) 19:09, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - PRODs are for uncontroversial deletions only. There is enough here to suggest the possibility of notability, and that deletion might not be uncontroversial, so more eyes on the article would be beneficial. See WP:PROD and WP:ATD. I have no other opinion on the article or the subject. Ingratis (talk) 18:21, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As I said in the edit summary. Adding for awareness. Ingratis (talk) 19:09, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, this is uncontroversial as stated in the PROD summary. It squarely falls under WP:DEL-REASON as the subject doesn't meet notability guidelines. More than happy to go through the process with as many eyes as needed. While I haven't gone through this process as many times as others, usually when I encounter a WP:DEPROD there is some sort of evidence provided to counter the PROD which wasn't done here so it's outside what I've typically experienced. GauchoDude (talk) 04:51, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think the page clearly meets notability requirements.

This athlete is notable due to being both the first elite acrobatic gymnast from Texas ever as well as the first men’s pair from the United States to final in a world championship. Sources below:

https://www.nelson.edu/news/alumna-brandi-lewis-trains-mens-pair-champions/

https://www.gymnastics.sport/site/athletes/bio_detail.php?id=32153

https://www.aicag.edu/alumni-stories/68-alumna-brandi-lewis-trains-mens-pair-champions/

https://usagym.org/history/u-s-acrobatic-worlds-rosters/

Subject also qualifies as notable as he won his country's “senior all-around or individual event finals national championship while competing for a country that qualified a full team into the most recent Olympics or senior World Championships” twice in a row, in 2009 and 2010 - https://usagym.org/history/championships-acrobatic/ 2601:140:8400:4320:4D9A:9A66:A637:9E47 (talk) 15:56, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This gymnast is notable due to being both the first elite acrobatic gymnast from Texas ever as well as the first men's pair from the United States to final in a world championship.

Sources below:

[2]https://www.nelson.edu/news/alumna-brandi-lewis-trains-mens-pair-champions/

[3]https://www.gymnastics.sport/site/athletes/bio_detail.php?id=32153

[https://usagym.org/history/u-s-acrobatic-worlds-rosters/https://usagym.org/history/u-s-acrobatic-worlds-rosters/

Subject qualifies as notable because

"Subject won their country's senior all-around or individual event finals national championship in 2009 and 2010 while competing for a country that qualified a full team into the most recent Olympics or senior World Championships"

https://+usagym.org/history/championships-acrobatic/ 2603:8080:7400:223D:9C97:5C6A:6714:DDD7 (talk) 16:04, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

None of those sources support notability, which requires coverage be independent. JoelleJay (talk) 21:16, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Point of clarification on the previous user above JoelleJay's argument stemming from WP:NGYMNAST - The assumption of significant coverage applies only to cases of artistic gymnasts, as stated in the first line. Regardless of the assumption, each individual subject must be held to WP:SIGCOV. GauchoDude (talk) 20:03, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:16, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence of IRS SIGCOV. JoelleJay (talk) 00:49, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, All Tomorrows No Yesterdays (Ughhh.... What did I do wrong this time?) 15:36, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Close-knit community

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTDICT. I really cannaot see hoew this is a viable topic for an article, and this steaming pile of (insert preferred euphamism here0 certainly does not do anything to persuade me otherwise. TheLongTone (talk) 15:30, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, or at the very least WP:TNT, this unreferenced, AI-generated mess. --MuZemike 17:15, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:47, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Group cohesiveness. Belbury (talk) 19:41, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Snediker

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:PROF pretty clearly and probably WP:BASIC as well. Sources present are largely blog posts or proofs of publication. A short search shows that other available sources don't appear to have significance or independence from the subject. The overall language leads me to suspect COI editing as well. ThaesOfereode (talk) 14:40, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Authors. ThaesOfereode (talk) 14:40, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This subject has a chapbook that was a finalist for the Lamba Literary Award. I’ll make a search now as there are possibilities of passing WP:NAUTHOR. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 17:45, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Danilo Irtishch

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not really notable on his own, only mentioned as an ancestor of Dostoyewsky Marcelus (talk) 12:51, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Belarus, Lithuania, and Russia. Marcelus (talk) 12:51, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I have tried to find sources before but couldn't find anything more than a passing mention (usually without even being named). I tried now to find sources again but the result was the same. Mellk (talk) 12:58, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:48, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mahmoud Vahidnia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sources lack any indication of WP:GNG (significant coverage). Xpander (talk) 10:10, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Xpander (talk) 10:10, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Philosophy and Iran. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:45, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: There are a few sources but they all seem to relate to one event, namely his criticism of Ali Khamenei as a student [4]. I'm not sure if that is important enough to mention on Ali Khamenei or 2009 Iranian presidential election protests or a similar article but if it is then a merge could be an alternative. Shapeyness (talk) 20:42, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:47, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Herman Mattson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BEFORE shows zero sources about this person; thus failing WP:GNG. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 11:46, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Sportspeople. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 11:46, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Rugby union and New Zealand. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:13, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm not finding much about him. I note that Australian reports of the 1925 All Blacks matches often refer to him as "A. Mattson" - perhaps he used his middle name? The National Library of New Zealand has info that was a Bank officer with the National Bank of New Zealand, Auckland, and on the Executive Council of NZ Bank Officers' Guild in 1939. [5] (not that that would contribute to notability, but would round out a bio). In Papers Past, the NZ digitised newspapers, there are an article about an Alfred Mattson who was a champion dirt track rider selected for the Tourist Trophy Races on the Isle of Man in 1933 [6], and in 1935 a mention that Alfred Mattson held the NZ record for 500cc machines [7]. If that is the same person, perhaps some motor bike racing wins or records would add to his notability - someone may know or find more about that. RebeccaGreen (talk) 13:35, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The motorcycle / speedway rider was Alf Mattson. Paora (talk) 01:49, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Doesnt seem to have significant coverage from WP:SIRS BTSfangir1 (talk) 11:08, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thanks to Paora for the clarification about the motorcycle / speedway rider. I would say Redirect to the 1925 New Zealand rugby union tour of New South Wales, but none of the articles about All Blacks tours seem to have lists of the team members. Surely that would be useful information, and a way to avoid having articles about those who were not notable but still enable readers of WP to find information? There are plenty of sources which name the members of the teams. (I am not offering to add such lists. I note with interest that WP articles on All Blacks tours are very poorly referenced, and many have no in-line citations, nor do they have any tagging. It looks like the Rugby Union wikiproject has a lot of work to do!) RebeccaGreen (talk) 11:37, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep following expansion. Paora (talk) 12:48, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the expansion?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:46, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Chording

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:DICDEF. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 11:55, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Video games, and Technology. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 11:55, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ethel (cat)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, a fairly new internet meme that is unlikely to receive lasting significance or impact, WP:TOOSOON to tell. jolielover♥talk 10:39, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal and Internet. jolielover♥talk 10:39, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, tagged as " A7. No indication of importance (people, animals, organizations, web content, events)". Geschichte (talk) 11:22, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per Geschichte. Ethel seems to be a real animal, so speedy could probably apply here, no? Procyon117 (talk) 16:50, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Anand Ranganathan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recreation of salted title: Anand Ranganathan, which was salted in 2023. Subject does seem to be notable, though coverage from reliable sources is a bit lacking, and page needs to be moved to salted title if kept. CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:32, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and India. CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:32, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Totally promotional content, clearly fails WP:GNG or WP:NAUTHOR. Baqi:) (talk) 13:22, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:49, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
delete - complete promtoional nonsense exaggerated to get an article here. see also the history here GRINCHIDICAE🎄 19:22, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Demolition Records

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly fails WP:NCORP. Previously PROD'd which was valid. Should not have been restored. Graywalls (talk) 06:22, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Companies, Europe, United Kingdom, and England. Graywalls (talk) 06:22, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:07, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 10:04, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I am not finding much coverage online. I wonder if there might have been coverage in heavy metal magazines in the 2000s, but that would need someone with access to that to check. All I can find are some sources that confirm they had distribution in Europe, Japan and North America (in a distribution list at the end of this article [8]; this article is specifically about distribution in Japan [9]). That latter article also has a bit more info - that the label had its own metal broadband TV show called Detonator TV - but whether it is either independent or reliable as a source, I am not sure. This website has an announcement of co-founder Eric Cook's death [10]. Following an edit summary in the article's history, I searched thegazette.co.uk and found that it appointed liquidators in September 2006 [11], [12], and the final meeting of creditors was held in 2011 [13]. If this article is kept, that information can be added. RebeccaGreen (talk) 13:06, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jakub Rojek

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NMG, WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Appears to be mostly a resume and self-promotional (WP:PROMO). No significant coverage in third party, independently published sources. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 06:10, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Poland. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:39, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Glane23,

Nothing in there seems to be self-promotional and all are verifiable facts (awards, compositions, album releases etc.)

I do not understand why you are suggesting the article to be considered for deletion, when it does exactly what any other artist page does on Wikipedia (lists accomplishments on their resume).

best,

Itzek Itzek1952— Note to closing admin: Itzek1952 (talk • contribs) appears to have a close connection with the subject of the article being discussed. (talk) 15:26, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:07, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Little to no coverage of this person in media that I can find, most albums are independent releases with only one on a semi-major label. Barely qualifies for NMUSIC. I don't see notability. Has never had a charted single, or any other quality we'd need for notability. Oaktree b (talk) 21:13, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 10:04, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 New Delhi railway station stampede

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NOTNEWS, this event does not meet WP:EVENT and is unlikely to have lasting, sustained coverage. jolielover♥talk 08:59, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, India, and Delhi. jolielover♥talk 08:59, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this article is definitely does not meet WP:NOTABILITY and WP:NOTNEWS as the event does not last that long, per WP:NTEMP. PEPSI697 💬 | 📝 09:16, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The crush resulted in reactions by the prime minister and the Minister of Railways announced an investigation. The crush is to a certain extent notable as it also received worldwide news coverage. As it is also 2025 Prayag Maha Kumbh Mela related, the best for now is to merge it into 2025 Prayag Maha Kumbh Mela crowd crush (and probably rename to 2025 Prayag Maha Kumbh Mela crowd crushes). 46.44.158.42 (talk) 09:55, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: WP:NOTNEWS, article still isn't ready for mainspace. E_F⁵ 16:15, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Stations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:50, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep While the page is snowballing towards delete, I do believe it's notable enough to not be discounted by NOTNEWS. The amount of casualties at 18 is higher than other Indian crowd crush articles (ex. 2024 Mumbai stampede), and with ongoing investigations, I believe we should keep the page around for now. Cheers! Johnson524 19:23, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

James Wallis (racing driver)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biography of a racing driver created by a WP:SPA. Although the driver has had some success in junior categories, he has not yet competed in any series that would qualify for notability per WP:NMotorsport. A WP:BEFORE search doesn't come up with WP:SIGCOV to pass WP:GNG. This may be a case of WP:TOOSOON. John B123 (talk) 08:32, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Motorsport, and England. John B123 (talk) 08:32, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as purely promotional and failing notability. Certainly not fit for main space and the author shows no sign of further constructive editing — GhostInTheMachine ^{talk to me} 12:56, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:GNG. Agree with WP:TOOSOON.Canary757 (talk) 13:15, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Hollander

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unfortunately, this actor's life was cut short, so his credits are few and fail WP:NACTOR, with only one significant role in Halloween. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:21, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Television, Cycling, California, and New Mexico. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:19, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I figured I'd point out that the first nomination in 2004 (long enough ago that it was a VfD discussion), based on the (few) comments there, appears to have been about a now-deleted article on a different Adam Hollander. (The current article was created in 2008.) No opinion on the current article. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:23, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- I can confirm that it was. That article is exactly the sort of stuff that led to our present speedy deletion criteria, and would qualify as A7 nowadays. Uncle G (talk) 09:08, 16 February 2025 (UTC) [reply]
For what it's worth, I can source the claim to being Keith, but the character we have another article for. As for the actor, the article is twice the size as it should really be, as it says the same things twice, first in prose and then in a table. I'm hard-pressed to source anything at all other than the Keith part, outwith IMDB, e.g. from books on film history. As far as I can tell, this all, including apparently the IMDB entry, leads back to a FindAGrave entry written in 2008, three months before this article was. Uncle G (talk) 09:08, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Halloween (1978 film)#Cast: and add this source: https://popculture.com/movies/news/halloween-actor-was-only-20-when-he-tragically-died-remembering-adam-hollander/ -Mushy Yank. 10:22, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- … which is, ironically, itself sourced to IMDB and FindAGrave. Uncle G (talk) 14:16, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  Yes, that didn't escape my notice, but it is a bylined article by a staff writer of a website that has been found to be reliable. Plenty of sources in GBooks mention the role and the actor. Feel free not to use that one. You don't even have to add a source for the cast anyway and I mention it for verification not for notability. -Mushy Yank. 15:48, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SoCal Legends

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another defunct ABA and CBA team that fails WP:GNG. All of the sources that arent stats websites have faded away, or are brief mentions of the team. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ロドリゲス恭子 (talk • contribs) 05:50, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 February 16. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:03, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Basketball, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:25, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Xen Coffee

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable coffee bar failing WP:NOTABILITY, most content is written by the owner. This is basically just a content marketing / SEO page. UKWikiGuy (talk) 04:29, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Companies. UKWikiGuy (talk) 04:29, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:56, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Brief mentions [14] are all I can find. Nothing notable shown by the sources used in the article either. Oaktree b (talk) 21:15, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
1. "這不是愛心靚湯，是外賣有機咖啡。" [This Is Not Heartwarming Soup, It's Takeaway Organic Coffee]. Eat and Travel Weekly [zh] (in Chinese). 2010-02-05. Archived from the original on 2011-07-18. Retrieved 2025-02-16.
  The article notes: "想不到，現在除了連鎖店賣有機咖啡有家位於鰂魚涌的小店Xen Coffee，基至在太古坊一帶速遞有機咖啡，只消打個電話或上網click幾下，便喝得到。最驚喜是，這些外賣咖啡不是用紙杯裝，而是平日盛湯水用的暖壺！打開新鮮熱辣香噴噴，喝完第三天，更有專人上門替你回收暖亞，貼心程度，媲美老媽煲的爱心老火湯。店主是對兄弟班，把有機咖啡當成湯水般外賣。是大哥Dixon的主意。... 店內幾款有機咖啡豆，全都是公平貿易產品。... 去年店子為響應「世界公平貿易日」，幾款公平咖啡破天荒不設訂價，讓客人「憑良心」付錢。"
  From Google Translate: "Surprisingly, in addition to chain stores selling organic coffee, there is a small shop called Xen Coffee in Quarry Bay that even delivers organic coffee in Taikoo Place. You can get it by just making a phone call or clicking a few times online. The most surprising thing is that these takeaway coffees are not served in paper cups, but in thermoses that are usually used for soup! It tastes fresh, hot and fragrant when you open it. On the third day after drinking it, someone will come to your door to collect the warm soup for you. It is so considerate that it is comparable to the loving traditional soup cooked by your mother. The shop owners are a group of brothers who serve organic coffee like soup. It was eldest brother Dixon's idea. ... The store has several types of organic coffee beans, all of which are fair trade products. ... Last year, in response to World Fair Trade Day, the store offered no set prices for several types of fair trade coffee for the first time, allowing customers to pay "according to their conscience"."
2. Chiu, Kai-yin 趙啟然 (2009-12-26). "咖啡的輕和重" [The Light and Heavy of Coffee]. Ming Pao Weekly (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2011-07-18. Retrieved 2025-02-16.
  The article notes: "位於地下小商場內的 Xen Coffee"是一業虹吸式咖啡（Syphon Coffee）惠門店，所講红吸，是由上下兩園玻城囊，和中間一塊濾紙（或連布）間格組成的簡單裝置，運用丽量的物理現象来系出一杯輕盈但純粹的咖啡，當熱水從下透騰平。"
  From Google Translate: "Located in a small underground shopping mall, Xen Coffee is a specialty shop offering Syphon Coffee. The 'syphon' refers to a simple device composed of two glass chambers stacked on top of each other, with a filter paper (or cloth) in between. It uses the principle of physical phenomena to brew a cup of coffee that is both light and pure, as hot water is drawn up from the lower chamber."
3. "品味速遞咖啡　Xen Coffee" [Enjoy Express Coffee: Xen Coffee]. U Food (in Chinese). Hong Kong Economic Times Holdings. 2009-02-04. Archived from the original on 2009-02-23. Retrieved 2025-02-16.
  The article notes: "年初開業的Xen Coffee（www.xencoffee.com）專外賣虹吸式（siphon）咖啡，借用外賣湯水的概念，在網站接受預訂，由專人以保溫壺將熱辣辣咖啡速遞送上辦公室。Xen Coffee以「優質 • 健康 • 環保 • 公平」為宗旨，揀選優質有機咖啡豆，並支持公平貿易，如危地馬拉公平咖啡（$32／杯；$56／壺），入口香醇，喝後有一陣回甘。目前Xen Coffee只在太古坊一帶（見地圖）提供速遞服務，其他地區的白領們可到其鰂魚涌地舖試試他們的手勢，兼享受美味蛋糕。負責人計劃稍後售賣健康飯盒，速遞服務會擴展至中環等黃金商區。"
  From Google Translate: "Xen Coffee (www.xencoffee.com), which opened at the beginning of the year, specializes in takeaway siphon coffee. Borrowing the concept of takeaway soup, it accepts reservations on the website and has a dedicated person deliver the hot coffee to the office in a thermos. Xen Coffee adheres to the principles of "high quality, health, environmental protection and fairness" and selects high-quality organic coffee beans and supports fair trade. Its products, such as Guatemala Fair Coffee ($32/cup; $56/pot), are mellow in the mouth and leave a sweet aftertaste. Currently, Xen Coffee only provides express delivery services in Taikoo Place (see map). White-collar workers from other areas can go to its ground floor shop in Quarry Bay to try out their gestures and enjoy delicious cakes. The person in charge plans to sell healthy lunch boxes later, and the express delivery service will be expanded to prime business districts such as Central."
4. "300秒等一口香醇咖啡" [300 Seconds to Wait For a Sip of Fragrant Coffee]. Weekend Weekly [zh] (in Chinese). 2009-03-02. Archived from the original on 2011-07-18. Retrieved 2025-02-16.
  The article notes: "一杯香醇咖啡絕對是香港人難得take a break的補充劑。香港人習慣了喝意大利式咖啡，但在鰂魚涌一小商場內卻出現一家主打賣虹吸式咖啡的小店Xen。... 店內的單品咖啡只有9款，但貴精不貴多，常見的日式炭燒、極品的藍山都能找到，而且還引入兩款危地馬拉及埃塞俄比亞「公平貿易」咖啡，店主更重視煮咖啡的水源，故用上鑽石水以確保水質純正。擔心連那5分鐘等待的時間也沒有？只要早半小時打電話或直接在Xen的網站內訂購，可回收的真空壺便可送到寫字樓，不過外送服務暫時只限鰂魚涌區。"
  From Google Translate: "A cup of aromatic coffee is definitely a supplement for Hong Kong people to take a break. Hong Kong people are used to drinking Italian coffee, but in a small shopping mall in Quarry Bay, there is a small shop called Xen that specializes in selling siphon coffee. ... There are only 9 types of single-origin coffee in the store, but quality is more important than quantity. Common Japanese charcoal-roasted coffee and premium Blue Mountain coffee are all available. In addition, two types of "Fair Trade" coffee are introduced from Guatemala and Ethiopia. The owner pays more attention to the water source for brewing coffee, so he uses diamond water to ensure the purity of the water quality. Worried that you don’t even have the 5 minutes to wait? As long as you call half an hour in advance or order directly on Xen's website, the recyclable vacuum flask can be delivered to the office building, but the delivery service is currently only available in Quarry Bay."
5. Karen (2009-05-22). "不設定價長留香郁 Xen Coffee 飲出咖啡新文化" [Xen Coffee: No Fixed Price, Lasting Aroma, Brewing a New Coffee Culture] (PDF). Sing Pao (in Chinese). p. 7. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-07-18. Retrieved 2025-02-16.
  The article notes: "你可曾嘗過一杯沒定價，價錢由你話事的危地馬拉，或埃塞俄比亞咖啡豆所沖泡而成的香濃咖啡嗎？這是Xen Coffee 虹吸式咖啡專門店，為響應「世界公平貿易日」，而特別選取兩款公平貿易有機咖啡，供參與咖啡慶祝會的人享用。像南山咖啡就帶有果酸，喜歡喝的人覺味道醇厚，但許多港人，或台灣人都不太愛喝它。而開這店，是想愛飲各種咖啡的人，可以不用「捐窿捐隙」。為方便客人，他們首創網上落單，收到指示後，把咖啡放入保暖壺內，再送到客人的手中。"
  From Google Translate: "Have you ever tasted a cup of fragrant coffee brewed from Guatemalan or Ethiopian coffee beans, with no price set by you? This is Xen Coffee, a siphon coffee shop. In response to World Fair Trade Day, it has specially selected two types of fair trade organic coffee for people participating in the coffee celebration to enjoy. For example, Nanshan coffee has a fruity acid taste, and people who like it feel it has a mellow flavor, but many Hong Kong or Taiwanese people don’t like to drink it. The purpose of opening this shop is to allow people who love to drink all kinds of coffee to have a place to do so without having to pay a lot of money. To facilitate the guests, they pioneered the online ordering system. After receiving the instructions, they put the coffee into a thermos and then delivered it to the guests."
6. "Top coffe spots: Causeway Bay and Wan Chai". Time Out. Archived from the original on 2009-08-26. Retrieved 2025-02-16.
  The article notes: "Xen Coffee Xen’s humble basement digs aren’t much to look at. Your attention is instead diverted to the siphon-brewing process going on at the counter, a mesmerising four-minute show. The owner-operator, Dixon Ip, lovingly runs this eco-friendly coffee haven for local workers and residents. He prefers the siphon method for bringing out the different flavours of the bean; hence five out of the seven roasts on the menu are of single origin. Strangely for a café, we smelt no coffee aroma – the physics behind siphoning ensures everything from the bean is contained within the drink. By concentrating exclusively on the perfect cup of brewed coffee, Xen has succeeded in giving customers exactly that. Shop K12, Manly Plaza, 997 King’s Rd, Quarry Bay, 2960 1388; www.xencoffee.com. Manager’s special: Yirgacheffe, Ethiopia (organic and fair-trade) is a medium roast with a long-lasting taste and a sweet and floral aroma with hints of muscatel. $26."
There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Xen Coffee to pass Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#Primary criteria, which requires "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject".
Cunard (talk) 00:25, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

These are just random local magazine articles. Based on your argument, every cafe in Hong Kong is notable and indeed even I can have a Wikipedia page since I have been mentioned in news articles before. These third party articles are additionally hosted on the subject's website explicitly to legitimise this Wikipedia article. UKWikiGuy (talk) 15:37, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For more consensus based on sourced founds by Cunard.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Benison (Beni · talk) 04:54, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Most links at the page are red and whats posted seems more advertising type writing than anything to make them stand out or be notable. Based on whats there just not enough to stand on its own. ContentEditman (talk) 16:25, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bhavishya Malika Puran

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural nom on behalf of @Kharavela Deva: whose nomination was: "The article's neutrality is disputed. Less coverage, non-reliable sources,no verifibility and also AI-generated content. It may broke WP:V,WP:N,WP:D" I am neutral Star Mississippi 00:32, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and India. Star Mississippi 00:32, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The article doesn't seems to be totally AI generated, see [15]. Also, The previous AfD reason which was written by them was 100% AI generated, [16] it was also noted by Jynixafy [17] Koshuri ^(グ) 08:18, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I find it hard to assess notability of recent Indian topics, per WP:NEWSORGINDIA. As far as this book is concerned, I would think it possible that the original text by Achyutananda Dasa could be notable, or at least worth including information about it in the article about him (though I note that article says that he "wrote numerous books, many of which could be loosely translated as the Book of Prophecies"). Trying to assess the refs in this article: (1) is a video, so inaccessible to anyone who does not know Hindi; (2) is unreliable (at the end is "Disclaimer. The above information is based on various sources. Webdunia does not officially confirm it." It does not mention the 2023 book, just the text by Achyutananda Dasa. (3) does not mention the 2023 book either. (4) does say it's a review of Bhavishya Malika Puran translated into Hindi language by Pandit Shri Kashinath Mishra in 2023, but just repeats the same summary of the predictions as other refs do. (5) does not mention the 2023 book either. (10) in English is by someone who says "I am enthusiastic blogger & SEO expert." Probably not reliable, but does end the review by saying "Bhavishya Malika’s Authenticity: Some people are not sure if the Bhavishya Malika is genuine. We don’t really know where it came from or who wrote it, and some experts think it might be a more recent creation. Different Interpretations: The things written in the Bhavishya Malika can be understood in different ways. So, people might read the same text and come up with different predictions. Accuracy of Predictions: There’s no scientific proof that the predictions in the Bhavishya Malika are correct. It’s impossible to predict the future with complete certainty." This review also has a summary of positive and negative predictions in the book. If this article is kept, it should include information about the book's reception and critiques of it, not just repeat its predictions. RebeccaGreen (talk) 10:16, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Difference defined The book supports unreliable sources. In my opinion, it is surely a religious pseudo-scientific book written by Achyutananda Dasa and it is wrongly translated by Mr. Kashinath Mishra. Even though I am from Indian state Odisha and worship Sri Achyutananda ji, I will call it a pseudo-scientific book. The Srimad Bhavishya Malika and it wrongly translated version Bhavisya Malika Purana should be differentiated. Regards,Ved Sharma (talk) (contribs) 12:52, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The book is backed with many reliable sources which is meeting WP:NBOOK. And it is reviewed by many notable websites such as ABP Live, Webdunia, and Zee News Rajeev Gaur123 (talk) 10:56, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom. Also, reading the article, it says published by Notion Press, which seems self-publication press. Asteramellus (talk) 01:51, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 02:08, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Vote is same as last AFD. The book is self published through Notion Press publisher. Book fails WP:NBOOK. Page does not have multiple reviews from reliable sources. I can not find if book has won a major literary award and if the book has been considered by reliable sources to have made a significant contribution in any area. Sources on the page are simply poor. RangersRus (talk) 15:49, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A self-published book could in principle be notable, if we had reliable documentation about it sufficient to meet the WP:NBOOK standard. It's uncommon, but it happens. Here, though, we have a WP:NEWSORGINDIA problem. The page has plenty of little blue clicky linky numbers, but that's not the same as actually warranting an article. XOR'easter (talk) 16:17, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lokenath Brahmachari

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Still not convinced this article meets WP:GNG since last deletion. BangJan1999 02:01, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Philosophy, Hinduism, and West Bengal. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:27, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of mutual-fund families in Canada

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

At risk of going against WP:DINC, I think this article as well as List of mutual-fund families in the United States should be up for discussion. These articles are vastly outdated, entirely lacking sources, and seem to now only serve as an advertising platform for these mutual funds. I'm not too sure whether they ought to be deleted, or redirected to List of asset management firms. Kylemahar902 (talk) 01:19, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Business, and Canada. Kylemahar902 (talk) 01:19, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:50, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I would like to see the creation of Mutual-fund families in Canada before suggesting a list. Azuredivay (talk) 10:06, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per WP:NOTPROMO This looks like an outdated stock market index. — Maile (talk) 12:51, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ayumi Anime

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was moved to draft as it lacked sources. It was moved back to mainspace four months later with no sources added. Subject is not WP:NOTABLE, had not won any awards, and has no WP:SIGCOV. External links are either broken, minor mentions or insignificant interviews, user-sourced databases, or spam. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 00:54, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Bands and musicians, Women, Advertising, Beauty pageants, Sexuality and gender, South Korea, France, Ukraine, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:52, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per WP:ANYBIO. No sourcing. The external links are pornography sites. Based on her un-cited date of birth of 1989, she would appear to be 36 years old. Given that, the claim that "She has filmed more than 100 films as an actress" would indicate they are all short-length porn films - as opposed to cinema-length films. But no sourcing to verify any of that. — Maile (talk) 02:29, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: She has appeared in 100 pornographic films, you can go through the list and find the respective films online. She has also been used in numerous lesbian filmsShe has also been nominated for awards and has been mentioned elsewhere. She is also known by over a million followers on Instagram. Lulanep (talk) 10:59, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Instagram follower count is irrelevant to notability. Besides, the nominations listed in the article aren't notable enough for an article. Procyon117 (talk) 16:44, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

None of that indicates notability?

Delete Unsourced BLP. A search on the subject's name did not provide any reliable secondary sourcing. ResonantDis_tortion 11:49, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unsourced, fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. Procyon117 (talk) 16:45, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Marissa Kurtimah

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominated by 99.142.64.153 (talk · contribs) for the following reason:

I feel she should be deleted because I couldn't find any sources that mention her competing in any Olympic events and she doesn't seem to have any coverage from local events either. I don't think this article should exist just because she was nominated for an Olympic team.

This is a procedural nomination; I am neutral. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:51, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Sport of athletics, Sierra Leone, and Canada. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:53, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:53, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Her accomplishments do not appear to satisfy WP:NTRACK, and a couple of short newspaper articles are little more than announcements from her hometown paper[18] or university-related,[19][20] so WP:GNG isn't satisfied. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:51, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Had no career on the international level, therefore only local coverage. Geschichte (talk) 11:21, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep. Per Tilastopaja the subject was nominated for the Canadian 2016 Olympic team and competed at the 2015 World University Games advancing to the semi-finals and finals, so the statement that she "had no career on the international level" simply isn't correct. Subject was also the 2016 Bajan national champion over 100m so she fulfills WP:TRACK prong 1 and prong 4, it's incorrect to say that she doesn't satisfy NTRACK.

Now getting to the actual coverage, above article from the Springfield News-Leader can't be dismissed outright because it's a "local paper" -- that still qualifies as "independent" per the WP:GNG definition, "Independent of the subject" excludes works produced by the article's subject or someone affiliated with it. For example, advertising, press releases, autobiographies, and the subject's website are not considered independent.

I've found several other high quality GNG-contributing sources, for example:

"Guleph sprinter proves she belongs with Canada's best". Waterloo Region Record. 16 Jul 2016. p. 1. Retrieved 16 February 2025.
"Olympic potential seen by teacher". Waterloo Region Record. 16 Jul 2016. p. 2. Retrieved 16 February 2025.
"Missouri State track star will run for Canada". The Springfield News-Leader. 12 Jul 2016. p. D1. Retrieved 16 February 2025.
"Kurtimah finishes 13th in 100-meter dash at World University Games". The Springfield News-Leader. 10 Jul 2015. p. D4. Retrieved 16 February 2025.
"Royal City showdown fizzles". Guelph Mercury. 11 Jun 2012. p. B1. Retrieved 16 February 2025.
"Triple threat off to blistering start". Guelph Mercury. 1 Jun 2013. p. 13. Retrieved 16 February 2025.

The next step is to improve the article using these sources, which I think I can take on in the coming days. But the case for deletion isn't backed up by P&G with the newly found sources. --Habst (talk) 14:10, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files

File:KUNA15.png

Speedy delete: Superceded by c:File:KUNA 2018.svg on Commons Mvcg66b3r (talk) 05:36, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sunflow eg.png

SunFlow is licensed under the MIT license (and so is its logo). Then why did the uploader copyright something that THEY made? 67.209.129.191 (talk) 14:35, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sarahmiles.jpg

Fails WP:NFCC #8; there's no strong reason presented why an image of this person from a 1980s movie significantly contributes to readers' understanding of the subject. Hog Farm _Talk 16:13, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:KBLR Logo 2018.png

Speedy delete: Superceded by c:File:Telemundo Las Vegas 2018.webp Mvcg66b3r (talk) 18:05, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

Wikipedia:VT

Wikipedia:VT → Wikipedia:WikiProject Vermont (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Obviously it's important to be very cautious when nominating project page shortcuts at RfD, but this one seems worthy of discussion. It's only been used 15 times, and of those instances, it seems that most did not intend to link to WikiProject Vermont. Its original destination in 2007 was Vandal target, and I see that it has also been mistaken as a shortcut for WP:Verifiability, not truth. Some of the intended targets cannot be readily determined, but they are clearly not the wikiproject. I think generally speaking, shortcuts to essays and guidelines are of more utility than wikiproject shortcuts. — Anonymous 15:35, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) for development

Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) for development → Free software (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Redirect is completely, 100% implausible for multiple reasons. You would have to 1) get the capitalization wrong (it isn't a proper noun), 2) not use the hyphen between 'Open' and 'Source', 3) have a parenthesized '(FOSS)' ???, and 4) tack on 'for development' for some godforsaken reason. This additionally redirects to 'Free software' instead of 'Free and open-source software', although that isn't nearly the main issue. Lastly, neither 'Free software' nor 'Free and open-source software' have any sort of section even remotely correlating to this redirect. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 14:22, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I support removal of this redirect; it serves no purpose that I can see and seems to have been created (19 years ago) only as a means to replace a non-article instead of deleting it. --Qcomp (talk) 14:42, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 United States constitutional crisis

2025 United States constitutional crisis → Department of Government Efficiency (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

As well as DOGE's activities on federal agencies, the term 'constitutional crisis' has also been used around the same time to refer to threats to ignore court rulings as well. Xeroctic (talk) 13:03, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete popular discussion of a constitutional crisis is not limited solely to DOGE or to its actions.

This would have to be its own article, but the use of the term in a descriptive sense would have to become much more widespread in the RS than it currently is in order for it be considered a neutral point of view description. Mikewem (talk) 14:46, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the identification of this name with the target subject is not sufficiently established. Neither is expansion to an article appropriate to describe what is currently a matter of passing opinion (WP:RECENTISM). 2601:642:4F84:1590:DDA6:FEA5:D834:38CE (talk) 16:16, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

BEASTofBURDEN

BEASTofBURDEN → Pack animal (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Having apparently been created as a redirect to an article about a fashion label, now deleted, there's no reason this odd stylisation should redirect to the current target. If not deleted (my preference) a better target is disambiguation page Beast of Burden. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:25, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom; anyone searching with that specific irregular capitalization is clearly looking for the fashion label and will find no valuable information at any article or DAB page we currently have. — Anonymous 15:37, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gaza massacre

Gaza massacre → List of massacres in the Palestinian territories (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Gaza Massacre → Gaza war (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

These are obviously not agreeing with each other, and I believe they are both in need of retargeting to Casualties of Israeli attacks on the Gaza Strip. That is the most logical article for where all the killings over the long history of the Gaza conflict are encapsulated. List of massacres in the Palestinian territories is not specific to Gaza and Gaza war is just a holdout from when all of this referred only to Gaza War (2008–2009), which is obviously only one of the possible meanings. Having it pointing to the current war, while plausible, might be falling afoul of WP:RECENTISM. Havradim leaf a message 08:14, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Havradim leaf a message 09:45, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Palestine-related deletion discussions. Havradim leaf a message 09:45, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Laa laa laa laa laaaaaaaaah...

Laa laa laa laa laaaaaaaaah... → The Blue Danube (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned in target, this is used twice on the internet and neither of them refer to this song, and no is going to search for this song like this. Rusalkii (talk) 06:56, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete – This is the just the conversation between Mr. Krabs and the DJ about the name of a song on the radio except not played as a joke. That someone thought this could help anyone is baffling. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 14:28, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, frivolous. 2601:642:4F84:1590:DDA6:FEA5:D834:38CE (talk) 17:54, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Friends lesbian kiss episode

Friends lesbian kiss episode → Friends season 7#ep166 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Are descriptive episode names like this helpful? I'm genuinely asking. Also, it seems to have been wrongly tagged as being from a merge. — Anonymous 02:03, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep I don't doubt someone would see smth like "my favourite episode of friends was the lesbian kiss episode" on socmed and look up something like "Friends lesbain kiss episode" User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 09:48, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, implausible search term, no evidence that this is a name. Let the search results do its thing imo. We don't redirect any "kiss episodes" of any television series, to the episode in question, on Wikipedia of all things, where every redirect requires perennial maintenance. Unhelpful redirect, let's not give the impression that these types of redirects are encouraged or acceptable. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 02:21, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@user:Yirba did you use this redirect in Wikidata? Because it might be deleted. Anthony2106 (talk) 05:16, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 02:54, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

English WikipediA

English WikipediA → English Wikipedia (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

WP:UNNATURAL capitalisation; implausible redirect. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 01:58, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per {{R from camelcase}}. I am bad at usernames (talk) 03:13, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This isn't a plausible search term, and if it was the search results would help a user find the right page. {{R from camelcase}} is for legacy page names.

I note that the creator of this redirect also created Ddox as a redirect, suggesting a deficient understanding (at best) of the purpose of redirects. Oblivy (talk) 03:22, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Oblivy, on that note, having looked through their contributions, I see that they have made many other confusing, often downright bizarre, redirects. Looking at Wikipedia:‑( makes me seriously question their level of competence. — Anonymous 03:39, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment camelcasE sayS nothinG abouT makinG thE lasT letteR captiaL, buT aS yoU caN seE thiS iS A verY normaL waY oF typinG sO thiS redirecT shoulD defientilY bE kepT^{[just kidding]} Anthony2106 (talk) 07:57, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

but someone should nominate https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WikipediA&oldid=208363752

Used on that uses page, they probably just copyed wikipediA Anthony2106 (talk) 08:08, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DeletE peR noM. 2A0E:1D47:9085:D200:8139:4F47:7D35:2A9F (talk) 13:41, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

weak keep, less per the nitty gritty of wp:camel, but per the styling of wikipedia's logo. then again, this redirect isn't exactly old, hence the vote being weak consarn _{(prison phone) (crime record)} 12:45, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 02:54, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per consarn - wikipedia's logo has the last letter larger than the rest, it's not implausible. WikipediA exists as a {{R from stylization}}. BugGhost 🦗👻 09:48, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dhruva Natchathiram

Dhruva Natchathiram → Dhruva (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Primary topic by far appears to be Dhruva Natchathiram (unreleased film). This alternative name isn't mentioned in the target. Sending this to RfD rather than redirecting myself to get further opinions, ideally from people who are familiar with Sanskrit and/or this subject area. Rusalkii (talk) 02:16, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think it was moved because "Dhruva Natchathiram" is another name for pole star. Bssasidhar, as the one who moved the article, you are requested to comment. Gotitbro, you are welcome as well. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:01, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Killer is Calling

The Killer is Calling → Lifetime (TV channel) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned in target. It's a movie, not a TV show, so it can't go to List of programs broadcast by Lifetime, and the movies don't have a page. Rusalkii (talk) 02:00, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. target article contains no information on the subject. Pyxis Solitary (yak). Ol' homo. ⚢ 17:49, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Grieving process

Grieving process → Five stages of grief (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

The five stages of grief aren't a widely accepted standard. I think retargeting to Grief is the better target. Interstellarity (talk) 01:10, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Grief – By redirecting to 'five stages of grief', we're not only putting our finger on the scale in favor of a specific model, but we're doing it for one which has zero foundation empirically or theoretically. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 14:54, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Templates and Modules

Template:Pan American Games torch relays

Template:Pan American Games torch relays (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All redlinks or redirects. –Aidan721 (talk) 19:22, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Nominator disruptively redirected all articles without consensus. This has been reverted. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:43, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Progressive groups in the US

Template:Progressive groups in the US (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template for a non-existing subject (Progressive groups in the US). And an overly broad scope. The Banner talk 14:45, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Miscellany

User:BrotherEarth967/Turned P

Same topic as Turned P. Both articles started as translations from w:fr:P culbuté, indepently by two different users, this one a year earlier. Paradoctor (talk) 11:26, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Twodubjay

The user's only contribution, last edited 2017, delete per WP:STALEDRAFT #6. Blanking per #3 would require "some potential". This production has had less than 300 views over the past decade, no hope of ever becoming notable. Paradoctor (talk) 10:41, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep per the stale draft guidelines, #2. Not problematic. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:43, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review

v t e Wikipedia community
For a listing of current collaborations, tasks, and news, see the Community portal. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the Dashboard.
General community topics	Administration News The Signpost Goings-on In the media Meetups Mailing lists Wikipedians Statistics The Wikipedia Library Centralized discussion Village pump Idea lab Policy Proposals Technical Miscellaneous WMF Holidays Bots
Contents and grading	Requested articles Most-wanted articles Images needing articles Articles needing images Articles for creation WP:AFC/R WP:AFC/C Creating articles Help Vital articles Articles for improvement Peer review Good article nominations Featured article candidates Lists Pictures Topics Article translation Pages Main Page Errors
WikiProjects and collaborations	Directory Culture and the arts Geographical History and society Science, technology and engineering Wikipedia assistance and tasks Patrols Recent changes Counter-Vandalism Unit Accessibility Organizations category
Awards and feedback	Reward board Contests A nice cup of tea and a sit down Charitableness WikiLove Compliment before criticism Kindness Campaign Thanks!
Maintenance tasks	Task Center Open tasks Backlog Category Admin category Edit requests Category Database reports Category tracker Dusty articles Special pages New pages Recent changes Controversial issues
Administrators and noticeboards	Administrators' noticeboard Incidents Edit warring Vandalism Admin dashboard Admin requests Closure Page protection User permissions Sockpuppets Open proxies Revision deletion Oversight Request Usernames Changing Title blacklist OTRS Bureaucrats' Requests for adminship and bureaucratship Arbitration Committee Requests Enforcement
Content dispute resolution	Requests for comment Third opinion Dispute resolution noticeboard Biographies of living persons Conflict of interest External links Fringe theories Neutral point of view No original research Reliable sources
Other noticeboards and assistance	Regional notice boards Requests for help Category Asking questions Teahouse Help desk Reference desk Adopt-a-user Copyright assistance Copyright investigations Text problems Media questions Resource requests Mergers History mergers Moves Page importation Spam Blacklist Whitelist Bots Education General sanctions Editor sanctions Long-term abuse
Deletion discussions	Guide Admin Today Articles Templates Files Categories Redirects Miscellany Speedy Proposed BLP Review Undeletion Arguments to avoid Arguments to make Article Rescue
Elections and voting	Requests for comment (meta) Wikimedia Foundation elections WP Democracy Milestones
Directories, indexes, and summaries	Departments Edit summary legend Editor's index Essays FAQs Glossary Abbreviations Help Manual of Style Simplified Rules Five pillars Policies Guidelines Shortcuts Templates Citation templates Tips Today Tools Wiki markup
Media Category Templates

Speedy deletion candidates

Articles

Files

Categories

NEW NOMINATIONS

Category:2019 Pan American Games event navigational boxes

Category:Books by Dwight D. Eisenhower

Category:Books by Ulysses S. Grant

Category:July 1852 in the United Kingdom

20th-century months in New Zealand

Early mass media introductions

Films by year of setting

Category:People from Barnard, Vermont

Category:United States government navigational boxes

Category:Naval battles of the Napoleonic Wars involving France

Category:Combat occupations of the early modern period

Category:18th-century Welsh slave traders

Category:Naval battles of the Thirty Years' War involving Portugal

Category:Naval battles of the French Revolutionary Wars involving Portugal

Category:19th-century Royal Dano-Norwegian Navy admirals

Category:Naval battles of the Napoleonic Wars involving Portugal

Category:Ibrahim Rugova

Redirects

Wikipedia:VT

Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) for development

2025 United States constitutional crisis

BEASTofBURDEN

Gaza massacre

Laa laa laa laa laaaaaaaaah...

Friends lesbian kiss episode

English WikipediA

Dhruva Natchathiram

The Killer is Calling

Grieving process

Templates and Modules

Miscellany

Deletion review