User talk:Kailash29792

I can relate

to As if real life, including an overworked, underpaying and unappreciative job isn't torturous enough [1]. Imagine how my situation would be given the fact that I'm trying to get a job, how was I supposed to stay happy throughout the process. DareshMohan (talk) 21:13, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

True. If I can state that I can relate to what you said, I believe I am correct. My first task whenever I sit in front of my pc is to access Wikipedia, and only then just look at the most important things. I think I am not addicted, but I too need to maintain a healthy balance in my life. Gowthamaprabu (talk) 08:17, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

@Srivin: @Gowthamaprabu: @Manick22: I think all of you have a job do you can edit here but since editing here would waste my time or make my family disown me, I can't for next few weeks (unspecified length of jobless period). So essentially I'm not finding time to edit but at the same time not fully satisfied on how to relieve stress or be happy. @Monhiroe: let's get full time jobs.

Sorry for sharing this but it's not like being happy is what others care about, it is a self satisfaction. Hope I mattered here, if at all. DareshMohan (talk) 08:51, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

I regret not having lived in a hostel. That would have reduced my reliance on family and I would still be able to edit on Wiki and have work life balance. I can't even edit at home as my family doesn't like it if I do. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:29, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for replying, most people aren't that open. Once I get a job I'll be fine also. In fact if any Tamil film buff uses Wiki, they are probably reading your content. 😎 Don't take what others say to heart. DareshMohan (talk) 14:17, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

Good Bad Ugly WW Collection

Good Bad Ugly WW collection is been changed 300Crs which is incorrect. As per leading tracking portals like Sacnik and Pinkvilla, the collection is around 240-250Cr. Please check and correct it. Shan28kk (talk) 01:37, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

Sacnik does not meet WP:RS. Pinkvilla is usable, as long as it does not take into from Sacnik, per WP:FRUIT. Kailash29792 (talk) 01:41, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

The citation website quoted to support the 300Crs also doesn't have a reliable source to support the collection. There is a major variation between the actual and the number which is reflecting. Just wanted to highlight the same. Thanks. Shan28kk (talk) 01:50, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

Pinkvilla

A user wrote, 'Pinkvilla sources says "The box office figures are compiled from various sources". Hence removing as sources are unverifiable.' Does it mean that it is an unreliable source, then? Espenthordsen (talk) 09:43, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

No. Pinkvilla is the most trustable of all sources now. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:43, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

The user also replaced them with churnalisms that use the producer's numbers. Can we change them back to Pinkvilla's source? Espenthordsen (talk) 17:04, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

Yes. Kailash29792 (talk) 17:05, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

The user keeps reverting it and wrote: "Pinkvilla states "Disclaimer: The box office figures are compiled from various sources". So WP:FRUIT and unverifiable source."

On the other side, the same user wrote: "Hans India tells about "trade sources". So don't know are they reliable or not. Unverifiable." Espenthordsen (talk) 15:36, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Is Pinkvilla reliable source for Suriya and Ajith film?

While several sources reported Retro (film) grossed over ₹100 crore worldwide, Pinkvilla source is stick to 92 crore only.[2] It also gives less collection ₹63 crore to Etharkkum Thunindhavan, while other sources reported the collection to be ₹175–200 crore. It's huge difference.

For Good Bad Ugly they reported ₹242 crore, while Hindustan Times reported the collection to be ₹179 crore. I think Pinkvilla is reporting less figures for Suriya starrer and high for Ajith starrer. Is this Pinkvilla even reliable? Epicion (talk) 12:32, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

I'm not expert on this, but I do know that there is no definite BO site for South Indian cinema, as each site reports a different figure. Better to continue using Pinkvilla, but treat them as reports rather than fact. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:45, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

Although they are reports, There is huge difference while they are reporting. Fun fact is that Pinkvilla reported the budget of GBU as ₹300 crore and collection as ₹242 crore, and calling it as successful, lol! Epicion (talk) 13:53, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

cast of Minsara Kanavu

Kindly stop deleting Ranvir Shah (44:31), Laxmi Rattan (2:11:29), J. Rajiv Choudhry (1:12:08), and Rajiv Menon (1:14:35) in special appearances with time stamps. Minsara kanavu is not a comedy film it is a serious drama film. Also stop bulk reverting of edits, change individually, and stop disrupting external categories. For now I have retained romantic comedy. Give benefit of doubt to fellow editor. If in doubt rewatch the film, and check these actors in film at end credits.Sukshmadarshinisrilanka (talk) 09:06, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

I have seen the film before. And it's not overly serious, but at the same time not a laugh riot. Ok, is romantic musical enough? Kailash29792 (talk) 12:32, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

May be you can consider this musical romantic drama film. Thanks Sukshmadarshinisrilanka (talk) 13:35, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

@Srivin: What credited roles did Pasi Narayanan and Sathyajith play in the film? They are in the end credits. DareshMohan (talk) 18:12, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

did they act in the film ? Srivin (talk) 14:04, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Yes Pasi Narayanan played lawrence school watchman, and C.P. Satyajit played Mani Deva's music troop friend who later becomes TV anchor. Another friend is Anju Mahendran, not Mahendra. Added them in cast.Sukshmadarshinisrilanka (talk) 03:06, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

@Sukshmadarshinisrilanka: Hats off for adding the full cast. DareshMohan (talk) 10:44, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks Sukshmadarshinisrilanka (talk) 15:39, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:S. Jagadeesan

Hello, Kailash29792. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:S. Jagadeesan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:09, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Samayam

Is Samayam source considered reliable? Epicion (talk) 06:21, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

Of course. Why? Kailash29792 (talk) 07:23, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

For doing this edit. Epicion (talk) 09:41, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

Retro is still running successfully in theatres

Retro is still running successfully in theatres. Pinkvilla's final report is false. See BookMyShow and other booking sites for proof. It is running in other theatres in Tamil Nadu and Kerala which is not showing in BMS. It is also running in overseas. Kindly remove Pinkvilla source as the movie is still running in theatres. 103.154.37.164 (talk) 12:27, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kurukshetra 2019 poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kurukshetra 2019 poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

Is Tamil vernacular not well documented?

I can't expand the Tanglish article [3]. DareshMohan (talk) 21:36, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

GOOD BAD UGLY BOX OFFICE

Good Bad Ugly Worldwide Box Office: Ajith Kumar's Tamil Movie Ends 25-Day Blockbuster Run, Eyes Rs 300 Crore Globally

lINK:https://english.jagran.com/entertainment/good-bad-ugly-worldwide-box-office-collection-ajith-kumar-tamil-movie-nears-rs-300-crore-mark-after-25-days-10235058 David Richard John (talk) 10:37, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Is Ramesh Bala a reliable source? That's who Jagran gets its info from. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:05, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

Coolie budget

Is it necessary to include ₹25 crore marketing cost in budget? Epicion (talk) 04:53, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Espenthordsen, is it? Kailash29792 (talk) 04:58, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Not necessary. As per Template:Infobox film, the infobox is meant to show just the production cost, so marketing and promotional expenses shouldn’t be included. Espenthordsen (talk) 05:46, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

I found a loophole in Wikipedia

And I want all of you guys to be clear on it. I figured it out after an editor was being blocked this way and he pinged me in his bye bye comment.

The way users are blocked and the fact that there is no way to prove innocence other than

1. telling someone your real name --> risky
2. showing a video that you yourself can log in and the person claiming to be you can't
3. telling Jimmy Wales you are innocent. Will he respond? The other Wikipedia founder specifically wanted usernames of people to be uniquely identified so that false identification is illegal which makes sense.

This loophole occurs when a user creates several articles that are deleted one way or another. While film articles could be connected to many people, bio articles can be linked to the person who the article is about, especially if they find their article before it's deleted. This is why you should be careful while creating articles make sure they are sourced and Kailash this is why I love Articles for Creation process. If most of these are deleted there is a huge claim that a random third party can claim that they paid for these articles to be created but they were deleted. Just image an actor telling their manager, why my Wikipedia article was deleted. Do you think that the manager emailing Wikipedia and subsequently blocking them is unheard of? Based on that user's talk page, the private information is something the user doesn't have access to, which is insane.

Editors that have a conflict of interest should be blocked like [4] like "Looking for an advocate" and "Need help for an article".

Oh yeah and the fact that random new users have requests on my talk page and maybe also Kailash's makes one thing clear, people offline at Wikipedia now about our existence and our articles (at least some of the ones in the film industry), else why would they give requests. I mean maybe Manick's poster IP and some other IP's who message me about unreleased films are innocent but you get the point. I guess the people in the film industry are "smart" enough not to reveal their IP addresses.

Sorry for ranting wish I could convey this to the Wikipedia admins but the fact that anyone could be blocked randomly is insane and the fact that someone is bad at English adds fuel to the fire cause both not innocent and innocent people can be bad at English but not innocent people are mostly bad only. Remember this user (other than his random SPI investigations he seemed innocent)?

Just check his Happy New Year - 2025 message, do innocent users write that, they usually don't stay for longevity. (Ignore the existence of exception Paradoxodarap who only edits one topic mostly)

Let's just assume he's not innocent but if he was sadly the way Wikipedia functions their is no way to escape blocks. Bro was writing Marathi articles, which sadly lack sources.

Curious to hear your thoughts. @Manick22: @Monhiroe: @Srivin:. Notice how editors who edit less frequently escape this mess. Also btw, his article topics range from different parts of India, does that mean he has connections from Kashmir to Kanyakumari, quite literally check the links.

At the end of day I just want to create awareness (I am not in movie industry else I would have created a court drama), it would be full of suspense.

Ig if we use good English and follow good faith and pray hopefully we stay here in the long run cause we are innocent. Oh yeah and btw guilty users will never disclose this process that I did above. Read User:DareshMohan#What irks me? #8 and 9.

Let me make it clear it is not an argument about this specific user but that any innocent user can be blocked and that new users who we can surely say don't act guilty/odd and stay long term should know about this occurrences so they don't get randomly blocked.

Ig users who have no job, insane free time can fall victim to this. If that user didn't create so many articles (maybe all poorly sourced) and left them all in draft space, would he have been blocked, answer is கேள்விக்குறி.

ஒரு தப்பு நடுக்கிட்டே இருக்கு, அது தட்டி கேக்க நம்ம கிட்ட உரிமை இல்லையா? Maybe, நம்மள ஒண்ணா சேர்ந்தா எதாசும் நடக்கும். இதுல எனக்கு எந்த லாபமும் இல்ல, just pure satisfaction.

At the end of the day we are all selfish for ourselves, which is why innocent blocks would go unnoticed, why would anyone fight for someone else anyways?

DareshMohan (talk) 18:00, 28 May 2025 (UTC)