Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions

Page extended-confirmed-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"WP:PERM" redirects here. You may be looking for Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission or Help:Permanent link.
This page is under extended confirmed protection, but non-EC users may edit its subpages.

    Requests for permissions
    Shortcuts

    This page enables administrators to handle requests for permissions on the English Wikipedia. Administrators are able to modify account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, file mover, extended confirmed, mass message sender, new page reviewer, page mover, pending changes reviewer, rollback, and template editor rights, and AutoWikiBrowser access.

    Editors wishing to request a permission flag here should do so following the procedure below. Editors requesting permissions are advised to periodically revisit the requests page, as notifications will not always be given after a decision is made. Editors should not expect their request to be answered right away and should remember to be patient when filing a request. To find out what permissions your account has, go to Special:Preferences, where your permissions are listed in the user profile tab under "Member of groups".

    Requests for permissions are archived regularly; please see Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Archive for an index of past requests.

    Bot report: No errors! Report generated at 16:50, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

    Permissions

    Handled here

    • Account creator (add request · view requests): The account creator flag is granted to users who are active in the request an account process. The flag removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24 hour period. It also allows users to make accounts with names similar to other accounts. The account creator flag is only given to users who participate in the ACC process and may be removed without notice should a user's participation in the account creation process cease.
    • Autopatrolled (add request · view requests): The autopatrolled flag is granted to users who are active in the creation of new articles. This tool is granted so their creations are auto patrolled in Special:NewPages. Unlike other requests, any user may nominate an editor for Autopatrolled, even without that user's consent. A user who wishes to have this flag generally should have created at least 25 articles and must be trusted, experienced, and must have demonstrated they are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, especially WP:BLP and Wikipedia:Notability.
    • AutoWikiBrowser (add request · view requests): AutoWikiBrowser is a semi-automated MediaWiki editor for Microsoft Windows, designed to make tedious repetitive tasks quicker and easier. It is essentially a browser that automatically opens up a new page when the last is saved. When set to do so, it suggests some changes (typically formatting) that are generally meant to be incidental to the main change. Please read the rules of use and registration requirements on the main page before requesting permission. This is not a true user right, but access needs to be granted by administrators just like other permissions. If approved, your name will be added to the CheckPage. Users with under 250 non-automated mainspace edits or 500 total mainspace edits are rarely approved. You will need to give a reason for wanting AWB access.
    • Confirmed (add request · view requests): The confirmed flag may be granted to new users who have not yet hit the threshold for autoconfirmed status. These are users who have not had both 10 edits and 4 days experience. People with this flag can upload files and edit semi-protected pages before hitting the autoconfirmed flag. Users requesting this flag must indicate clearly why they should be exempted from the customary confirmation period.
    • Event coordinator (add request · view requests): The event coordinator user right allows editors to create multiple new accounts, and to temporarily confirm accounts so that they can create new articles.
    • Extended confirmed (add request · view requests): The extended confirmed flag is normally automatically added to accounts after 500 edits and 30 days, but may be added to legitimate alternate accounts of users that already have this access. The flag allows users to edit pages under extended confirmed protection.
    • File mover (add request · view requests): The file mover user right is intended to allow users experienced in working with files to rename them, subject to policy, with the ease that autoconfirmed users already enjoy when renaming Wikipedia articles.
    • Mass message sender (add request · view requests): Mass message sender enables users to send messages to multiple users at once. This flag is given to users who have made requests for delivery in the past, clearly showing an understanding of the guidance for use.
    • New page reviewer (add request · view requests): The new page reviewer user right allows users to mark pages as patrolled and use the page curation toolbar. At administrators' discretion, the right may be accorded on a time limited basis or indefinite.
    • Page mover (add request · view requests): The page mover user right allows users experienced in working with article names to move them, subject to policy, without leaving behind a redirect. They may also move all subpages when moving the parent page(s). General guidelines include making 3,000 edits and 6 months of editing history. At administrators' discretion, the right may be accorded on a time limited basis or indefinite.
    • Pending changes reviewer (add request · view requests): The reviewer flag is granted to users who are experienced enough with Wikipedia editing and its policies for contributing to the process of reviewing articles placed under pending changes.
    • Rollback (add request · view requests): Rollback enables users to remove vandalism much more quickly and efficiently than by undoing it. Users who do not demonstrate an understanding of what constitutes capable vandalism fighting, either because they have no or little history of doing so, or show a poor ability to discern between good and bad faith edits will not be granted this right. Also, it is unlikely that editors with under 200 mainspace edits will have their request granted. For a more detailed explanation of rollback and information about when it is appropriate to use the tool, see Wikipedia:Rollback. For information about the technical details of the feature, see here.
    • Template editor (add request · view requests): The template editor flag allows users to edit protected templates and Lua modules. General guidelines for granting include making at least 1,000 edits overall (with at least 150 to templates or modules), being a registered user for over a year, and having a record of successfully proposing significant edits to several protected templates. Users should demonstrate proficiency with template syntax and an understanding of the need for caution when editing heavily-used templates.

    Handled elsewhere

    Several permissions are requested and handled elsewhere:

    Review and removal of permissions

    The requests for permissions process is not used to review or remove user rights:

    The bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight permissions are removed at meta:Steward requests/Permissions. Stewards will typically not carry out such requests unless they are made on behalf of the Arbitration Committee, by a user who is requesting their own access be removed, or in cases of an emergency.

    Process

    Requestors

    To make a request for a permission, click "add request" next to the appropriate header and fill in the reason for wanting permission.

    Administrators

    Full instructions at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Administrator instructions

    Administrators are permitted to grant account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, event coordinator, file mover, mass message sender, new page reviewer, page mover, pending changes reviewer, rollback and template editor flags to any user who meets the criteria explained above and can be trusted not to abuse the tool(s). Administrators may either grant these permissions permanently or temporarily. For convenience, a bot will automatically comment with relevant data if the user does not meet configurable qualifications. Even if the bot does not comment, administrators should review the user's contributions and logs to ensure the tools will be used appropriately and check for any indication of potential misuse.

    Once an administrator has granted a permission or decided to deny a request, they should add {{done}} or {{not done}} respectively under the request with their comments. If a user already has the requested permission, or is autoconfirmed and requesting confirmed, {{already done}} should be used. N hours after the last comment was made (as specified by the config), the request will be archived automatically: approved requests will be placed here; declined requests will go here. See User:MusikBot/PermClerk#Archiving for more information on archiving functionality.

    Other editors

    Requests for permissions is primarily intended for editors requesting a permission for their own account. Other editors are welcome to comment if they have specific information that is relevant to that request that a patrolling administrator is unlikely to discover for themselves. Otherwise, since only administrators can effectively respond to these requests, general comments or 'clerking' by other users are rarely helpful. Non-administrators cannot "decline" to grant a request, because they're not in a position to accept it.

    A limited exception to this is Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled, where third party nominations are encouraged. Other editors should still avoid offering general remarks on requests and leave the final decision to an administrator.

    Current requests

    Account creator

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    Autopatrolled

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:C1K98V

    Hello, I have created 75+ articles, since I got autopatrolled mostly focusing on television series. For transparency, I'm still working on the feedback received from @Schwede66 in my last request. And I intent to keep doing the good work. Thanks for your consideration. Wishing the community a prosperous new year. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 06:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user was granted temporary autopatrolled rights by Schwede66 (expires 00:00, 23 January 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 07:01, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Could you please point to where the date of birth of Gautam Vig is referenced, C1K98V? Schwede66 08:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi @Schwede66, I hope you enjoyed your vacation. I have sourced the DOB in the early life section as per WP:INFOBOXREF. I followed the editing style of Geniac, the way he improved Sheezan Khan and tried adapting the same. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:48, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks, I had a fab wee holiday. I don't understand your answer. I see that there is one ref in the infobox, and that reference does confirm the date of birth, but it is attached to the spouse only. Could you please explain what you mean, and how the referencing confirms the date of birth, C1K98V? Schwede66 08:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Schwede66 In the above mentioned article I have sourced the date of birth in the Early life section, see here. And the spouse's source is just about their marriage. I'm following the editing style of Geniac, the improvement he did in one of my previously created article see here. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 09:38, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, which reference states the date of Vig's date of birth? I cannot see it. Schwede66 18:29, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Schwede66, I have used two sources for DOB, Colors TV and India Today. You can find both the sources in the Early life section. Hope it helps, if you still can't verify the birth date, you're most welcome to remove it. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 18:50, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @C1K98V Is it just me or the webpage you're linking to from colorstv.com is redirecting to a /mena/ directory making it impossible to see what you're talking about or citing. As for the indiatoday.in, you did not initially position the citation as of when Schwede66 started reviewing your request, you only repositioned the citation today. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:07, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi Vanderwaalforces, I'm not sure if the Colorstv website works outside of India. Let's wait for Schwede66 to confirm if they're able to verify it. I'm sharing a screenshot of the website for reference [1]. While searching for sources related to their academics, I found IndiaToday and added it later in the Early life section. I repositioned the named citation as I wanted to highlight it for Schwede66, so I left an edit summary too. Thanks for your consideration. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 03:43, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    (Non-administrator comment) I can access the colorstv source and confirm that it mentions Gautam Vig's date of birth. – DreamRimmer (talk) 12:18, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    That's good to know, because I have the same problem that Vanderwaalforces talks about. I will have to get back to this item. Schwede66 07:44, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Walco1

    Concise, well-written and sufficiently articles, mostly with a royal or Church of England focus. I looked at an articles of theirs as part of NPP, and found it to be up to standard without editing. Others look reasonable too. Klbrain (talk) 12:15, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Иованъ

    It is my 8th year of editing (4th with this account). I have written a number of articles of various types and none have been permanently deleted. I have made mistakes, but understand what they were and how to avoid them. About to publish many geography stubs (manually written, differing in content, not violating MASSCREATE - see Ledenice and Zapeć for examples). Articles like Cirsium greimleri, First Vrbnik Breviary, Petər Klepəc and Veternica are more representative of my work, though. Ivan (talk) 17:48, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:GanzKnusper

    91 main space articles, 45 rated above stub, no deletions. I mostly create articles for albums or BLPs of musicians. GanzKnusper (talk) 09:26, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:AlphaBetaGamma

    I know my first articles are... bad, but my recent pages, Yumeshima Station, Meitetsu KiHa 10 series, Meitetsu 3400 series, and Resignation services should be good without being patrolled. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 03:11, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:AmateurHi$torian

    The user has created 189 articles, and only two have ever been deleted—with one later restored. They have a strong understanding of reliable sources (WP:RS) and are well-versed in BLP policies (WP:BLP). I've reviewed one or two of their articles, and I believe they truly deserve the rights. Baqi:) (talk) 13:03, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    @Jannatulbaqi: Thanks for considering me :) -AmateurHi$torian (talk) 15:39, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    AutoWikiBrowser

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.


    User:Boredintheevening

    I would like to start using AWB for carrying out tedious/minor edits, I've familiarized myself with the documentation and I meet the criteria for use. Thank you. Boredintheevening (talk) 00:13, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done. Primefac (talk) 12:29, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Sebbog13

    I moved Troll (1986 film) to its current title. There is a film called Trolls (film) and Troll (2022 film). The original title Troll (film) would have to become a redirect to or a disambiguation itself. I don't wanna change all the links to Troll (film) manually. Sebbog13 (talk) 15:42, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done * Pppery * it has begun... 17:59, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


    Confirmed

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    Event coordinator

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    Extended confirmed

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:Boutboul

    Arcticocean requested that, "If [I] wish to gain [ECR] again, the onus would be on [me] to prove that trust has been regained." To address this challenge, I would like to respond to the two concerns raised:

    1. "You have added translated content from other Wikipedias without attribution."
    2. "You have artificially split your article contributions into separate edits to more quickly reach a high edit count."


    1. Translated content without attribution

    In October 2024, I misunderstood the rules regarding proper attribution for translated content. Since January 2025, I believe I have consistently included proper attribution in all my edit summaries, as demonstrated in these examples: here, here or here.


    2. Split article contributions

    Regarding this concern, I would like to clarify that my first 350 edits, made between 2006 and 2013, occurred before the 500 edits rule was introduced (2016). These edits could not have been intended to meet a requirement that did not exist at the time.
    I acknowledge that I intentionally split my contributions to reach the 500 edits threshold, only for the remaining 150 contributions needed to meet this target.
    However, since then, I have made over 700 additional contributions (~1200 in total) without splitting them. This can be seen in my average edit size, which is approximately 350 bytes and aligns with averages observed among contributors, including administrators.

    I hope this explanation demonstrates my commitment to addressing the concerns raised and regaining trust. Michael Boutboul (talk) 15:19, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for extended confirmed declined in the past 90 days ([2][3]) and has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([4]). — MusikBot talk 15:20, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @ScottishFinnishRadish: would you like to review this first? — xaosflux Talk 13:32, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    At this point I think it would be better assessed by fresh eyes. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:10, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    File mover

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    Mass message sender

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.


    New page reviewer

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:Chicdat

    Hi. Currently the third most active pending changes reviewer on DreamRimmer's list, and I thought I'd try my hand at some larger-scale work of a similar fashion – rather than reviewing edits, reviewing articles. I'm good with newcomers and know how to work on articles. I'd also like to help reduce the frighteningly large backlog. Thanks for considering my request. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 12:25, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    (Non-administrator comment) Hi there. (An admin will review your request). In the meantime you've only been a pending changes reviewer for just over a month and last year you only made just over 200 mainspace edits. From look at your talk page messages, You may have some time to go before you have fully absorbed all that is required at WP:NPP. Have you considered enrolling at the NPP School ? Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:04, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Kudpung: I suppose the spam accept may be sort of a deal-breaker at the moment (although I've certainly learned my lesson about that). I wouldn't be opposed to going through NPP School first. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 11:00, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    NPP puts powerful tools in the hands of users and they need an almost admin level knowledge of most policies. This comes very hard on the heels of you obtaining the PC right. I suggest you continue with that for a while and in the meantime thoroughly read the tutorial at WP:NPP, follow all the links to related processes and policies (especially CSD, Redirect, and moving), learn which parts needs consensus for changes, participate at WP:AfD to learn how that works, and then apply for a course at the NPP school in a couple of months. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 18:53, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Kudpung, trying to get a sense of where you stand on this, since you marked this not done, informed Chicdat politely on their talk page (which they acknowledged and accepted), but then you self-reverted the {{not done}} tag here two hours later. Did you want someone else to take a look at this request at this time? signed, Rosguill talk 18:12, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm guessing Kudpung self-reverted since, as they aren't an admin, they can't accept or decline the request. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 19:04, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Only admins can accord the right. Any other experienced user can investigate and make an obvious decline - that's how I purposely designed this user right and its policy when I created it. I felt nevertheless that a further review in this instance may be appropriate. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:40, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Ok, having reviewed their recent AfD record, while the match rate is high, some of the arguments are shaky, and there's also signs of a lack of thoroughness in WP:BEFORE. I'm going to go with  Not done for now, and recommend WP:NPPSCHOOL if there is an available mentor. signed, Rosguill talk 23:54, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:MimirIsSmart

    My permissions expire at midnight UTC on February 8, so I am here to request a renewal of my new page reviewer permissions following its expiry. Reviewing new pages had been an educational experience in my Wikipedian career and I hope to do so to contribute after having my permissions renewed. MimirIsSmart (talk) 15:51, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 8 February 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 16:00, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you for your continued interest in this permission. Unfortunately, having reviewed your trial run track record, I am going to have to mark this  Not done. I'm seeing several issues, including marking reviewed a page that would later be nominated for AfD and deleted at JakeFuture27, marking a BLPPROD page reviewed at Vallabhaneni Maheedhar, missing clear signs of UPE at Ramsey Solutions (now in draft space), approving the completely unnecessary splitting out of Murder of Pop Smoke when there is clearly room to include that information comfortable at Pop Smoke, approving a clearly non-neutral WP:PIA article drafted by an IP at Husayn Muhammed al-Umari, accepting Provincial road 34-12 (Turkey) despite the prior AfD visible in the page's history. signed, Rosguill talk 18:42, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:SunloungerFrog

    I was granted new page reviewer rights for 30 days until Feb 8th. I'd like to request that those rights be renewed. SunloungerFrog (talk) 23:41, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 8 February 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 23:50, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
     Done, track record looks good. signed, Rosguill talk 19:33, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:RedactedHumanoid

    One month ago I was given a trial run for NPR rights, which ended today. I enjoyed doing NPR and helping with the backlog, and I am requesting for a renewal of those rights for another month (or potentially longer) so I can keep helping with the backlog. RedactedHumanoid (talk) 07:03, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done, track record looks good, although I think you're misapplying WP:NGEO, as Eymir, Bozdoğan, Çarşı, Bozdoğan, Hıdırbaba, Bozdoğan, Hisar, Bozdoğan do not meet the SNG and do not cite sources that meet GNG. On another note, Egyptian Banks Company is nowhere near meeting WP:NCORP as written, although coverage is available on Google Scholar. A {{sources exist}} tag may have been advisable there. signed, Rosguill talk 19:45, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Lukewarmbeer

    Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights

    I would like to help clear the backlog and having done a couple of weeks and learned a bit I think I can make a useful contribution here. Lukewarmbeer (talk) 13:05, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Shall I assume not then? I quite enjoyed my short stint. Lukewarmbeer (talk) 22:54, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Lukewarmbeer Thank you for your continued interest in this permission. Unfortunately, upon reviewing your track record, I don't think it would be appropriate to extend permissions. I'm seeing several misapplications of WP:PROD at 97th century, MAHA, Meenas, a BLP without sources that you approved at Paul Mingo Ghogomu (now in draftspace), and a pretty clear failure to do an adequate WP:BEFORE at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emirate System in Nigeria. I recommend signing up for WP:NPPSCHOOL, and would offer to instruct you myself, but I do not think I have time to take that on myself at this time. Alternatively, you can feel free to reapply in a few months' time provided that you continue to participate constructively with deletion discussions and tagging such that you can demonstrate that you've learned from the mistakes I've pointed outt here.  Not done for now. signed, Rosguill talk 20:25, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Aqurs1

    Please renew my rights, thank you. Aqurs1 (talk) 06:06, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Trial extended for another month, as you did not review any articles during the trial period  Done signed, Rosguill talk 23:57, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Jolielover

    I've been pretty active in the AFD process recently and been creating and improving articles as of late. I like going through the NPP and wish to become a reviewer to reduce the backlog and help out. I've already had a hand in improving some of the articles on there, by fixing up errors, adding categories, linking them in other pages etc. I hope to become a reviewer to help out, thanks! jolielover♥talk 17:31, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([5]). — MusikBot talk 17:40, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
     Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply signed, Rosguill talk 00:00, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Trex32

    Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights

    I have authored a few articles, improved the quality of many articles including adding high quality references and improving encyclopedic quality. I have also limited experiences in deletion. I also have just been granted AFC reviewer options and starting to increase my participation in that. Welcome feedback if I can qualify. Thanks for the consideration Trex32 (talk) 00:19, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Trex32, Can you please explain how you came to possess the rights to File:Anand Reddi 2024.jpg? signed, Rosguill talk 00:07, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    HI Rosquill, In 2015, I took a picture of the subject among other panelists as a journalist blogger at conference in Brazil in 2015 on maternal and child health. I edited the photo and had permission from the subject and the other conference panelists and the conference organizers. Please forgive me if I uploaded the photo incorrectly with the incorrect attributions. I thought i did it correctly. I see I incorrectly labeled the photo as 2015 and not 2024. I will correct it. Thank you for the consideration. Grateful for the consideration. Trex32 (talk) 02:19, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Iljhgtn

    Though I predominantly work with redirects, at least recently, I also engage with new pages and would like to help further in the new pages patrol in reviewing for quality and to help with the backlog. I have made almost 46,000 edits and believe that I can help. Iljhgtn (talk) 16:30, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Thank you for your interest in this permission. Unfortunately, your AfD history has a rather low match-rate, and includes several examples where other participants criticized your WP:BEFORE.  Not done signed, Rosguill talk 00:14, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Pizzaonpineapple

    I would like to be a new page reviewer, I continuously contribute to New Pages and having failed the previous request to be one, i would like to try once again having positively learned more and contributed to much more new pages. Pizza on Pineapple (Let's eat🍕) 07:54, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([6]). — MusikBot talk 08:00, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    (Non-administrator comment) You made you first edit to Wikipedia just over a month ago and have made only 389 edits to mainspace. This still falls short of the the minimum criteria linked to above for this user right, and admins may call for additional experience.Tagging of pages for deletion is best left to qualified New Page Reviewers. We do need more reviewers so I would suggest you thoroughly read and understand the tutorial at WP:NPP, and then reapply in a couple of months when you have a measurable track record. You may also wish to enroll at the NPP School. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 19:39, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Page mover

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.


    Pending changes reviewer

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:Ali Beary

    I'd like to request pending changes review rights because I am familiar with the policy and this would help me with my vandalism patrols. Furthermore, I am currently trying to accept a request, but I do not have the permissions. Thanks! Ali Beary (talk2me!) (stalk me?!) 13:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    @Ali Beary Given your recent WP:CUTPASTE move, I'd like to see a little more time for you to demonstrate your knowledge of Wikipedia policies and procedures before granting additional permissions. --Ahecht (TALK
    PAGE    )     22:44, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ahecht, ah, apologies. I didn't realize a "request moves" page existed, and I do not have move or merge permissions. I was simply undoing something that wasn't correct... hence why I requested move perms earlier so I could fix it. Ali Beary (talk) 12:38, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ahecht just curious, would you object to a grant here? If so this should be declined for now. Otherwise I'd consider granting since PCR is a pretty newbie-friendly permission. Elli (talk | contribs) 17:35, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Elli I haven't re-reviewed their history, but if there have been no significant red flags since mid-January I'd be fine with granting. --Ahecht (TALK
    PAGE    )     17:54, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:MPian

    I have been an active contributor to Wikipedia and focused on editing articles, reviewing new pages & combating vandalism. I am requesting for PCR right to speeding up the review process for pending changes. I am familiar with key Wikipedia content policies, including vandalism, biographies of living persons (BLP), neutral point of view (NPOV), verifiability, and copyright compliance. I've also been involved in patrolling recent changes, where I use Twinkle tool to revert vandalism. With my experience and understanding of these policies, I believe that I can effectively contribute to reviewing pending changes. 𝐌P⚚𝛂n 𓃠 {✝alk} 20:05, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Vellutis

    I'm well familiar with Wikipedia policies. And in my spare time I am always on duty to combat any vandalism or violation of Wikipedia policies. This right will serve me well. Thanks! Vellutis (talk) 18:48, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([7]). — MusikBot talk 18:50, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]


    Rollback

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:Squawk7700

    After starting with Recent Changes Patrolling I found myself in a very rewarding position, seeing that I can help other Wikipedians and the Wiki as a whole. But I also experienced the limitation of not having the Rollback right so I'd like to switch to AntiVandal or Huggle. Squawk7700 (talk) 22:20, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done —Femke 🐦 (talk) 15:27, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:QalasQalas

    after 2 years I got alot of editing, wanna test another experience. thanks QalasQalas (talk) 00:15, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    @QalasQalas: what would you use rollback for? —Femke 🐦 (talk) 15:28, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    AntiVandalism as you see this Edit and Edit2 new users vandlized account which why i need roll thanks. QalasQalas (talk) 17:24, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:PRRfan

    Hi. I've recently come across several instances where rollbacking would be faster than manually reverting nonconstructive consecutive edits. I don't patrol Recent Changes, but I am quite active and have more than 3,100 pages on my Watchlist. Thanks for your consideration. PRRfan (talk) 04:11, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Template editor

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:Jlwoodwa

    I come across bugs in template-protected templates from time to time, and I think I'm proficient enough to fix them without someone else checking it over. For instance, I recently submitted an edit request to fix {{Huggle/warn-unsor-2}}'s substitution behavior, and I found a similar issue in {{uw-editsummary2}}. I understand that edits to widely-used templates should be tested in a sandbox first, that they should reflect consensus, and that they can have nontrivial performance costs. jlwoodwa (talk) 01:51, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Standard Guidelines review:
    1. Green tickY (guideline: >1 year, applicant: ~2)
    2. Green tickY (guideline: >1000 edits, applicant: ~89k)
    3. Green tickY (guideline: >150 template edits, applicant: ~2300)
    4. Green tickY (guideline: !<6 months, applicant: NA)
    5. Green tickY (guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: 3)
    6. Red XN (guideline: 5 requests, applicant: ~4)
    Primefac (talk) 15:30, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Primefac: Are you not counting Module:WikiProject banner/sandbox because the module is fully-protected? Even if the template-editor right wouldn't have mattered there, I think my edits to the sandbox still demonstrate a familiarity with the care and responsibility required when dealing with high-risk template modification. As for the requests, I think you might have missed Wikipedia talk:Template index/User talk namespace/Archive 20 § Template-protected edit request on 1 September 2024 due to its unusual namespace. jlwoodwa (talk) 05:23, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    The WT edit request would fall under the category of a "trivial edit". I did miss the module sandbox though. Primefac (talk) 12:46, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
     Done for a three-month trial. Primefac (talk) 13:51, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions&oldid=1181725208"