Python web development and frameworks in 2007 (jp's domain)
Over the past year or so I have spent a whole lot of time evaluating different web frameworks, trying to find what works best for me. Like many programmers, I am a bit of a perfectionist, but I am also a pragmatist. I want my tools to work absolutely right every time, and I want my tools to help me effectively get certain tasks done. However, if you've programmed much at all, you know that perfect
TurboGearsã®ã‚¢ãƒ‰ãƒãƒ³ãƒ†ãƒ¼ã‚¸ã¯å…ˆé€²æ€§/先行性ã¨ãƒã‚¶ãƒ¼ãƒ«çš„ãªé–‹ç™ºã‚³ãƒŸãƒ¥ãƒ‹ãƒ†ã‚£ | TRIVIAL TECHNOLOGIES 4 @ats ã®ã‚¤ã‚¯ãƒ¡ãƒ³æ—¥è¨˜
ã¿ã‚“ãªã®IoT/ã¿ã‚“ãªã®Pythonã®è‘—者。二å玉近ã160平米ã®åºä»˜ã一戸建ã¦ã«å«/æ¯å/娘/ã‚ã‚“ã“ã¨æš®ã‚‰ã—ã¦ã¾ã™ã€‚月間1000万PV/150万UUã®Webサービスé‹å–¶ä¸ã€‚ å…è²¬äº‹é … プライãƒã‚·ãƒ¼ãƒãƒªã‚·ãƒ¼ http://jesusphreak.infogami.com/blog/vrp1 ã¾ã‚å«ã€‚é•·ã„ã‘ã©ãªã€‚ã“ã‚Œãらã„ササッã¨èªã‚ãªã„よã†ã§ã¯ï¼Œ5å¹´ã§æŠ€è¡“ãŒé™³è…化ã™ã‚‹åˆ†é‡Žã®é–‹ç™ºè€…ã¨ã—ã¦æœªæ¥ãªã„ã¨æ€ã†ã‹ã‚‰ã¨ã«ã‹ãå«ã€‚ TurboGearsãŒã¾ã‚‹ã§éŽåŽ»ã®ç‰©ã®ã‚ˆã†ã«æ‰±ã‚ã‚Œã¦ã„ã‚‹ã‚ã‘ã ã‘ã©ã€‚DjangoãŒè‰¯ãã§ãã¦ã„ã‚‹ã®ã¯100%åŒæ„ã™ã‚‹ã‚ˆã€‚Pylonsã¯ã¾ã‚「ãƒãƒ³ã‚µãƒ ãªã€ãƒ•ãƒ¬ãƒ¼ãƒ ワークã よ。ãŸãã•ã‚“ã‚る新興フレームワークã®ä¸ã§æœ‰æœ›æ ªã§ã‚ã‚‹ã“ã¨ã¯ç¢ºã‹ã ã。 件ã®è‘—者ãŒä½•ç‚¹ã‹æŒ‡æ‘˜ã—忘れã¦ã„ã‚‹ã“ã¨ãŒã‚る。ãã‚Œã¯ï¼ŒTurboGearsã¨å‘¨è¾ºã®é–‹ç™ºã‚³ãƒŸãƒ¥ãƒ‹ãƒ†ã‚£ã®ã€Œæ°—質ã€ã«ã¤ã„ã¦ã 。ã¨ã¦ã‚‚オープンã§ï¼Œã©ã‚“欲
TurboGears and Pylons (a technical comparison)
TurboGears and Pylons are two popular web frameworks; TurboGears hit the scene about a year and a half ago, Pylons started picking up steam maybe six months ago. They are both modern MVC frameworks, targeting a similar style of development. Here's a description of the technical differences: Similarities Both are MVC-style frameworks. Neither is particularly CMS oriented in the framework itself (un
1
リリースã€éšœå®³æƒ…å ±ãªã©ã®ã‚µãƒ¼ãƒ“スã®ãŠçŸ¥ã‚‰ã›
最新ã®äººæ°—エントリーã®é…ä¿¡
処ç†ã‚’実行ä¸ã§ã™
j次ã®ãƒ–ックマーク
kå‰ã®ãƒ–ックマーク
lã‚ã¨ã§èªã‚€
eコメント一覧を開ã
oページを開ã
Google Code Archive - Long-term storage for Google Code Project Hosting.
On form libraries
{{#tags}}- {{label}}
{{/tags}}