Rough Type: Nicholas Carr's Blog: A bureaucracy of sorts
« Because we can | Main | The very long tail of spam » A bureaucracy of sorts June 17, 2006 Wikipedia "is not the experiment in freewheeling collective creativity it might seem to be," writes Katie Hafner in today's New York Times. So what is Wikipedia? "At its core," Hafner says, "Wikipedia is not just a reference work but also an online community that has built itself a bureaucracy of sorts -
Rough Type: Nicholas Carr's Blog: Out of context
June 08, 2006 Clay Shirky, in responding to Jaron Lanier's recent essay Digital Maoism, provides an excellent description of the way Wikipedia works today: Neither proponents nor detractors of hive mind rhetoric have much interesting to say about Wikipedia itself, because both groups ignore the details. As Fernanda Viegas’s work shows, Wikipedia isn’t an experiment in anonymous collectivist creati
1
ランã‚ング
ランã‚ング
ランã‚ング
リリースã€éšœå®³æƒ…å ±ãªã©ã®ã‚µãƒ¼ãƒ“スã®ãŠçŸ¥ã‚‰ã›
最新ã®äººæ°—エントリーã®é…ä¿¡
j次ã®ãƒ–ックマーク
kå‰ã®ãƒ–ックマーク
lã‚ã¨ã§èªã‚€
eコメント一覧を開ã
oページを開ã
Rise of the wikicrats
Deletionists, inclusionists and delusionists
{{#tags}}- {{label}}
{{/tags}}