Final Optimizing Reading Program

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 20

CONSULTATIVE CONFERENCE

OF DISTRICT READING
COORDINATORS
IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF
READING PROGRAM
JAY J. GALLEGOS
EPS-English
OPTIMIZING FLEXIBLE & FUNCTIONAL
READING
PROGRAM
Monitoring and Evaluation

• Promoted and
sustained culture
of reading
RO SDO • Improved
• Profiling of teachers’ teaching
learners ability in reading
Continues Teaching instruction and
• Baseline Professional Reading
intervention
Data Development Materials
• Strengthened
Programs Provision
• Program school and
Impelementat community
reading program
ion Review Development •
Promoting and Access in teaching
• Research Sustaining a
of and learning
Findings Supplementary
Culture of materilas
Reading
Reading
Materials

Improved learners’ reading


proficiency and learning
CO SCHOOLS outcome

Community & Stakeholders


Sulong EduKALIDAD
BAWAT BATA BUMABASA INITIATIVES (DM 173, s. 2019)
THE FLEXIBLE
READING PROGRAM

Anchored on DepEd Based on the four Aligned with the Designed as an


Vision, Mission, and Pillars of Sulong components of 3Bs offshoot of
Core Values EduKALIDAD Initiative of Project assessment
#Walang Maiiwan
IMPORTANT

The Reading Program should be


responsive to the unique needs of the
learners and adaptive to their context
THE
OF A FLEXIBLE & FUNCTIONAL SCHOOL READING

COMPONENTS
PROGRAM
1 2 3 4 5 6
Adjusted Flexible Flexible Contextualize Needs-based Support
Reading Learning Reading d Capacity System
Curriculum Delivery Assessment Learning Building
Resources
THE COMPONENTS OF A SCHOOL READING PROGRAM
1. Review the Most Essential Learning
Competencies (MELCs)
2. Capture program, grade level, and
learning area standards
3. Anchor on the (MELCs)
4. Unpack and subtask clustered

1 competencies
5. Break down MELCs into manageable
sub-competencies
ADJUSTED
6. Integrate reading within and across
READING learning areas
CURRICULUM
1. Reading instruction
2. Reading enrichment for independent
readers
3. Reading enhancement for instructional
readers
4. Reading remediation for frustration
2 readers and non-readers

Learning modalities should be adaptive


FLEXIBLE
LEARNING to the context of the learners.
DELIVERY
 Scenario 1: Learners with no electricity, no
gadgets, TV & radio
 Scenario 2: Learners with electricity but with
limited technology
 Scenario 3: Learners with electricity and
technology with limited internet connectivity
 Scenario 4: Learners with electricity,

2
technology, and stable internet connectivity
 Scenario 5: Learners with special needs

LEARNING & Use the results of Learners’ Enrolment


DELIVERY Survey (LES) in adopting appropriate
modality
1. Administration of Phil-IRI pretest and posttest
2. Progress tracking
3. Formative and Summative Assessment
4. Analysis and interpretation of assessment results
5. Utilization and dissemination of assessment
results

3
Assessment should be administered in
ASSESSMENT compliance with DepEd issuances and
safety protocols
1. Mapping of existing LRs in reading
2. Review of online reading materials in
DepEd Commons and other LR portals
3. Development of supplemental reading
materials (print, non-print, digital, learning
activity sheets, etc,)

4 4. Quality assurance of developed LRs

LRs should be wide range, varied,


LEARNING
appropriate, and compliant with LR
RESOURCES
standards
1. Analysis of teachers’ learning and development
needs for reading instruction
2. Webinar on Teaching Reading Using Multimodal
Learning Delivery
3. Learning Action Cells on Early Language Literacy
and Numeracy (ELLN), contents and pedagogy
assessment of learning outcome
4. Coaching and mentoring

5 5. Provision of Technical Assistance

Learning and development programs for


CAPACITY teachers should be consistent with DO 50, s.
BUILDING 2020 (Professional Development Priorities for
Teachers)
1. Resource generation for Brigada Pagbasa
2. Partnership with barangay, LGUs, TEIs,
and Alumni Association and other
organization
3. Volunteer works of parent-tutors, student-
teachers, and other individuals capable for

6 reading instruction

SUPPORT
The partnership initiative of the
SYSTEM schools should be anchored on
Brigada Pagbasa
PARTS OF A FLEXIBLE
SCHOOL READING
PROGRAM
Components Objectives Activities Modality Time Resources Outpu
t
Frame
Man Mater Money
ial

1. Reading Indicate Specify here the Specify the Specify


modality in the date
Curriculum here the flexible activities or
the carrying of
2. Flexible specific tasks per component out the implemen
Learning objectives activities/task tation
Delivery for each key s adaptive to
school and
3. Flexible action step learner’s
Assessment context
4. Learning
Resource
5. CapB/TA
6. Support
System
7. M&E
TIMELINE
Activities Time Frame

1. Administration of Phil-IRI pretest Feb-March2020

2. Submission of Phil-IRI pretest results March 2021

2. Reading intervention, remediation, and enhancement March-May l2021

3. Administration of Phil-IRI posttest June 2021

4. Validation of Phil-IRI post test results June 2021

5. Submission of Phil-IRI post-test results 4th Week of June 2021


The School Reading Program should
be

INCLUSIV
E
INTEGRATIV
Bawat bata bumabasa
Bawat guro de-kalidad ang pagtuturo
Bawat eskwela mapagkalinga
Bawat isa ay kaisa
Dahil sa SDO-Isabela…

WALANG
MAIIWAN
WE RECOVER AS
ONE

You might also like